The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlansP.I.N. 08-12-122-015 FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT P.I.N. 08-12-122-016 MAPLE STREET LOFTS P.I.N. 08-12-122-034 P.I.N. 08-12-122-036 A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT "A" IN CORPORATE SUBDIVISION NO. 10—A, AND LOTS GRAPHIC SCALE 10 16 AND 17 IN A A WEBERS ADDITION TO MT PROSPECT IN THE EAST 1/2 CUTISET CROSS OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST '° ° 15 '° 60 120 \ OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ( IN FEET ) \ 1 inch = 30 ft. I � '368 AREA SUMMARY ° GROSS 283,306 SQUARE FEET OR 6.505 ACRES o `e^ R.O.W. DEDICATION 0 SQUARE FEET OR 0 ACRES N� 2 � I � ' \ NET AREA 283.306 SQUARE FEET OR 6.505 ACRES z ® (TO HEAVY LINES) N to 6 (BASED ON MEASURED VALUES) J � W U V w I � S6927 34 F \ \ z p9, LJ o 0 LJ 0 \ C� cn 0' \ I cn sFTe qC� 44/ �M I � tiFR�eY 's3�9, �eR�c q ;FO FOUND 1' O.O.I.P. I 588'31'39"E 8.10' HELD I 0 n m w I C J� o� w I Z o N 17 o� 0 16 N m I N OD o cD I X N rn 15 LOT A Ot FOUND 71W O.D.I.P.Iff- NELD V — z O O �� 4 I L4 N �� L o to P zzm Lam" I �P I W � J 33' 33' of N N Fri (A N Cn 11 I I LEGEND 10 o 12 _I I SET 7/8" O.D.I.P. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SET CONCRETE MONUMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED + SET CROSS IN CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 60' SETBACK LINE HEREBY ABROGATED LINE LEGEND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LINE ADJACENT LAND PARCEL LINE I LOT LINE ---- EASEMENT LINE 124.93' 136.42' --- CENTERLINE LINE FOUND CROSS BUILDING — — SECTION LINE FOUND a30' sou 1N & N$$'42'14"W 401.59' 140.24' ate• VEST ABBREVIATIONS D.I.P. = OUTSIDE DIAMETER IRON PIPE (— — (R) =RECORD BEARING OR DISTANCE (M) = MEASURED BEARING OR DISTANCE o _ — — — --E— SND CRD yor SOUTHON LINE EMNOM (C) = CALCULATED BEARING OR DISTANCE (D) = DEED BEARING OR DISTANCE B.S.L. – BUILDING SETBACK LINE — ---�.�'O�_ — — O ST -MEET — — U.E. = UTILITY EASEMENT D. E. = DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.U.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENTS P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT HEREBY VACATED P.O.B. =POINT OF BEGINNING P. U. & D.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT '0 K:\Psdata\2018 Projects\18.0293\18.0293-01 Plat of Sub\18.0293-01SUBPLAT.dwg [�\\ PROJECT DATE: 1-10-19 PC DRAWN BY TFS CHECKED BY GB BOOK PG MAPLE STREET I LOFTS N0. REVISIONS DATE BY ~L z C v [ M PASS > tJ AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: 1. PER VILLAGE REQUEST 2-6-19 TFS MRA Om SURVEYING ETD Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 RECORDER'S BOX 324 N ALTA SURVEYS • TOPOGRAPHY 0 CONSTRUCTION u STAKING CLIENT 2631 GINGER WOODS PARKWAY, STE. 100 NICHOEAS & ASSOCIATES AURORA, IL 60502 1001 Freehanville Drive PHONE: (630) 820-9100 FAX: (630) 820-7030 EMAIL: ADMIN(aCLSURVEYING.COM Momrt Prospect, Illinois 60056 FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAPLE STREET LOFTS GRAPHIC SCALE � 30 o Is ao so Izo A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT "A" IN CORPORATE SUBDIVISION NO. 10-A, AND LOTS CUT SET CROSS 10, 16 AND 17 IN J.A. WEBERS ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT, IN THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST ( IN FEET \ OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 1 inch = 30 ft. \ LOT AREA SUMMARY -41 I � \ 90 \ LOT 1 115,009 SQUARE FEET OR 2.640 ACRES LOT I LOT 2 32,258 SQUARE FEET OR 0.741 ACRES 1 ;Q I COMMON AREA IN 589'17_- LOT 3 136,039 SQUARE FEET OR 3.123 ACRES F R.O.W. DEDICATION 0 SQUARE FEET OR 0 ACRES ® I � (A6 � - ----- I ' \ 1 p NET AREA 283,306 SQUARE FEET OR 6.504 ACRES U (TO HEAVY LINES) u �*+ NO -42'22"W 17.07' ��/ \ (BASED ON MEASURED VALUES) I 55921'34"E I^1 19.28'\� Ss9• \ cn N30° 6 LJ Ic0 13.00' \ �s 09. LJ �\ 7.5' SIDEWALK EASEMENT HEREBY GRANTED � o l \ I 4M NI I I I \ A I 60'07'40"E � I I oo \ 12.10'o NON COMMON AREA 0i 1 1 62.50' ^o• n N S44'17'38"W N I 10.61' F' I r I Ss92 O FOUND 1. O.D.I.P. �" HELD 3g„ � o 7' F lo" oo LOT o1 I \ 18.64' 1 I I I 1 1 I 2 I I I I I I zetn w 255.33' 1 D I I B o o w S89'17'38"W 254.33' I NON COMMON AREA 1 Iz I to of o IN �I o z O COMMON 0 41 o N y 00 LOT 2 N ;h AREA I N ^? I 1:E rri I rn n? N m I� oo 0) I01 o w - 91 w I I I y 62.50' I I I S89'17'38"W 254.33' I I I I I I 1 S89 -17'38"W 66.00' 1 18.51' L- -------- w DAwS�N COMMON AREA DRIVE C' CH=16.84 W V V 1 V (PRIVATE) CB=S50'42'50"W QJ R=13.50 U 589'17'38"W 717' 3' 589'17'38"W 315.84' _ 6.5_0'_ _ _ r 43.50 5.32' N I N89°17'38"E I S° w I o p 11.00' O N89'17'38"E 109.00' �f-------N89°17'38"E 131.00' 1 z Ln I I z o f I I U! FWND 7/e' QD.I.P. I I HELD 18.50' Imo o�1 1�o $ awl �� N I I N NON COMMON AREA o I �' n 63.00' I I I NON COMMON AREA nNi ISN NSI ISN I COMMON AREA 1 I 1 20' FTim I 1I I I S89°17'38"W 109.00' S89°17'38"W 131.00' J I NON COMMON I ------------------J L--- --- -------------- AREA w o a o m I I 10 w r I of 20 0 0 0 --r I n N IN NI _ 43.50 r 43.50 N89'17'38"E i N89'1 7'38"E i I g rt o 3 ® Z I z i N89 17'038"E i i I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I i N N I 63.00' to 01 J I I I C j j I I G I I F NON COMMON I I I I NON COMMON I I I I I I I V N rn w I 10 AREA 1 COMMON AREA I NON COMMON I IZ AREA I I o I 1 z AREA o f l 0 1 o I oI to of 1� 10 33' 1 I m -De I I v I I N 33' 1 N I N I I N I N to I� NI IN NI IN 1N r 1 Im I � 1 m aD I -Ni o w 1 I n w 1 t o Imo',, lo 1 589°17'38"W V1 L--43.50' 25.33' m 11.00' 25.33' W r 43.50' UNT I I o o I o f t o 87.00' 1 o c 1 34.00' N89°17'38"E I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 18.00'1 OA I 1 I LEGEND I I I I I I I S89'17' 38 W I I S8 '17'38 W 1 I S8 7'38 W I 1 43.50-- J L -- ---J L-- ---J 63.00' _ 1 H I I NON COMMON I AREA 1 o o 1 SET 7/8" O.D.I.P. I UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED w w wo 0 o uj 0 o 0 o N 1 COMMON AREA I� N SET CONCRETE MONUMENT 0 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED C6 o 0 N89'17'38"E 109.00' ,11.0---- ------ 18.67' ---------------------------- , NB9'17'38"E 131.00' I I rN.1"- I , 1 1 O to + UNSET CROSS IN CONCRETE LESS OTHERWISE NOTED I I z �� Ul o 1 o o I I z o o 1w� p �w1 1wN E Nwl I o S NON COMMON AREA o of 63.00' LINE LEGEND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LINE o NON COMMON AREA N N N, I I N i I 1 S89'17'38_W 131.00_ I I I ADJACENT LAND PARCEL LINE I 589'17'38"W 109.00' - ---- - - - ---- - -----� -- 589 '17'38"W I1 L.34' LOT LINE rl.45' N B.S.L ---- EASEMENT LINE --- CENTERLUILDINGINE I - - SECTION LINESETBACK LINE FOUND aiOSS N88'42'14"W 401.59' aao SouTH & - 43.50= N 1 ate' xesr ABBREV 1AT10N S DIAMETER IRON PIPE - O.D.I. P. -02' (R) = RECORD BEARING OR DISTANCE (M) = MEASURED BEARING OR DISTANCE o - _ - - - -E. FOureD aeons y02' SOUTH ON LINE EXTENDED (C) = CALCULATED BEARING OR DISTANCE (D) = DEED BEARING OR DISTANCE B.S.L. - BUILDING SETBACK LINE U.E. = UTILITY EASEMENT D. E. -DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.U.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING P.U. & D.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT - -- �'O _ - - o S�++ p� co _F;1 C� - - K:\Psdata\2018 Projects\18.0293\18.0293-01 Plat of Sub\18.0293-01SUBPLAT.d a Y COM PJJ rm 66 PROJECT MAPLE STREET LOFTS Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 DATE: 1-10-19 PC DRAWN BY TFS CHECKED BY GB BOOK PG N0. REVISIONS DATE BY 1. PER VILLAGE REQUEST 2-6-19 TFS RA O SURVEYING LT Q EJ ALTA SURVEYS • TOPOGRAPHY 0 CONSTRUCTTON STAKING CLIENT 2631 GINGER WOODS PARKWAY, STE.100 t AURORA, IL 60502NICHOLAAS &ASSOCIATES PHONE: (630) 820-9100 FAX: (630) 820-7030 EMAIL: ADMIN@CLSURVEYING.COM 100 t Fre OLDrive MotutL Prospect, Illinois 60056 FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAPLE STREET LOFTS A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT "A" IN CORPORATE SUBDIVISION NO. 10—A, AND LOTS 10, 16 AND 17 IN J.A. WEBERS ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT, IN THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE NOTARY'S CERTIFICATE -- , )SS COUNTY OF ) I, , A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE AFORESAID, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE SAME PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE AS SUCH APPEARED BEFORE ME THIS DAY IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE/SHE SIGNED AND DELIVERED THE SAID INSTRUMENT AS THEIR OWN FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF . 20 ZONING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS COUNTY OF COOK ) APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS ______ DAY OF --------------- 20__. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: VICE CHAIRPERSON: VILLAGE ENGINEER CERTIFICATE STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS COUNTY OF COOK ) APPROVED BY THE VILLAGE ENGINEER OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS ___ DAY OF ------------------- 20__. VILLAGE ENGINEER VILLAGE COLLECTOR CERTIFICATE STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS COUNTY OF COOK ) I FIND NO DEFERRED IN STALLMENTS OF OUTSTANDING UNPAID SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS DUE AGAINST ANY OF THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE PLAT. SIGNED: VILLAGE COLLECTOR DATED THIS ______ DAY OF 20__ BOARD OF TRUSTEE CERTIFICATE STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS COUNTY OF COOK ) APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS ____ DAY OF ------------ 20__. SIGNED: VILLAGE PRESIDENT ATTEST: VILLAGE CLERK COM l A PROJECT W MAPLE STREET LOFTS 6s 66 OSURVEYING LTD Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 ALTA SURVEYS* TOPOGRAPHY* CONSTRUCTION STAKING CLIENT l� O z 2631 GINGER WOODS PARKWAY, STE. 100 NICHOLAS & ASSOCIATES W AURORA, IL 60502 PHONE: (630) 820-9100 FAX: (630) 820-7030 EMAIL: 1 MINrvCLSURVEYING.COM 1001 Freehauville Drive Prospect Illinois 60056 STORMWATER EASEMENT PROVISIONS ACCESS EASEMENT PROVISIONS AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IS HEREBY PROVIDED OVER ALL OF THE AREA DENOTED HEREON AS 'COMMON AREA". SAID EASEMENT IS GRANTED TO ALL NON COMMON AREAS WHICH ACCESS ONTO SAID EASEMENT. THE COMMON DRIVEWAY AND PARKING CONTAINED IN SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OR IF ONE IS NOT ESTABLISHED OR INEXISTENCE BY ALL OF THE OWNERS OF ANY NON COMMON AREAS DENOTED ON THIS PLAT WHICH ACCESS SAID EASEMENT AND ALL OWNERS AND SUCCESSOR OWNERS AGREE TO MUTUALLY MAINTAIN THE EASEMENT PREMISES AND EQUALLY SHARE THE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES. BLANKET UTILITY EASEMENT A NON—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR AN GRANTED TO THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COMMONWEALTH EDISON, AMERITECH, NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY, COMCAST, OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND HOLDERS OF EXISTING FRANCHISES GRANTED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WITHIN THE AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAT AS COMMON AREA TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, RECONSTRUCT, REPAIR, REMOVE, REPLACE, INSPECT, MAINTAIN, AND OPERATE UNDERGROUND TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS AND LINES UNDER THE SURFACE OF THE COMMON AREA, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS MAINS, ELECTRIC LINES, AND CABLE TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF ACCESS THERETO FOR THE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY AND REQUIRED FOR SUCH USES AND PURPOSES, AND TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO INSTALL REQUIRED SERVICE CONNECTIONS UNDER THE SURFACE OF EACH LOT TO SERVE IMPROVEMENT THEREON. SURVEYOR'S AUTHORIZATION TO RECORD I HEREBY DESIGNATE , AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES THEREOF, TO RECORD THIS PLAT, A TRUE COPY OF WHICH HAS BEEN RETAINED BY ME TO ASSURE NO CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO SAID PLAT. DATED THIS _____DAY OF_____________________, 20____, AT AURORA, KANE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. COMPASS SURVEYING LTD PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM LAND SURVEYOR CORPORATION NO. 184-002778 LICENSE EXPIRES 4/30/2019 BY: SCOTT C. KREBS ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 3509 EXPIRES 11/30/2020 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION COUNTY OF KANE ) I, DAVID P. FILIPSKI, ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 3352, HAVE SURVEYED AND SUBDIVIDED THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY: LOT "A"IN CORPORATE SUBDIVISION NO. 10—A, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF BOTH LOT 'A"IN BOESCHE'S RESUBDIVISION AND LOT "A"IN CORPORATE SUBDIVISION NO. 10, BEING IN THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID CORPORATE SUBDIVISION NO. 10—A (RECORDED JANUARY 21, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 25755385), TOGETHER WITH LOTS 10, 16 AND 17 IN J.A. WEBERS ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT (RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1954 AS DOCUMENT NO. 16044478), A SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. THIS SUBDIVISION IS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT WHICH HAS ADOPTED AN OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IS EXERCISING THE SPECIAL POWERS AUTHORIZED BY THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ACCORDING TO 65 ILCS 5/11-12-6 AS HERETOFORE AND HEREAFTER AMENDED, THIS SITE FALLS WITHIN "OTHER AREAS: ZONE X" (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500—YEAR FLOODPLAIN) AS DEFINED BY THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 0216J (MAP NUMBER 17031CO216J), HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 19, 2008. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL AT AURORA, ILLINOIS THIS ------- DAY OF --------------------- 20 ---- COMPASS SURVEYING LTD PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM LAND SURVEYOR CORPORATION NO. 184-002778 LICENSE EXPIRES 4/30/2019 BY: DAVID P. FILIPSKI ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 3352 LICENSE EXPIRES 11/30/2020 D _. '1S NIOONII *3 o u r r a / i� "an""' n .r^µ. � -" ..-..,.c: �i � I,( � � � i�� ✓ Jdi" � 1 ii yl, f �y l i l� �t I na II , m '� R umm i/ um go// a 3:,d 11 g uuuuuuumo umummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlo� �. F' '; 0 iv U Q u W 0- V) 0 I� 2 V) N ccO \ 4- L p Q cn nj II r6 to U N (L) L II N O V W J @ U Lia 2 V' m H Z U W Q N H Q Q Z N U Q Q U p W 0 •= a V— W — p Is C N N W rn N ti Ln Q Ln 2 cn c N c L v a� o o Q _ L-6 a) Q O p Q+ i Z U 0 Q .. Q Q ro r t0 J 101 N 0 0 L = O W o a a N O o Q W Z O Q O v� 70 70 UN N � O' M LLIJ N ON a U W EUV) g L O Q Q d H a = v= c � U d o N M Q E - ro D O J N CO m C N .� N 2 H LSl Ln (Y') QLL- H W p N _U Z U' J O r 6 rO E L(- ro N f N f %D . . W M N N N o M- o W > N 0 © t D _. '1S NIOONII *3 o u r r a / i� "an""' n .r^µ. � -" ..-..,.c: �i � I,( � � � i�� ✓ Jdi" � 1 ii yl, f �y l i l� �t I na II , m '� R umm i/ um go// a 3:,d 11 g uuuuuuumo umummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlo� �. F' '; 0 iv U Q u W 0- V) 0 I� 2 � U � Q o N CL z w LLJ: w Q p W OO O W Q: LO JillI .,, _... NO t� iiml%1%/ La IUB /e ... r... / �I�III�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�III� I� V1 X101 W,M r n N �r n n n r ,In N o 01, 0 7 :.(l '! '. 1� I J .,r.. i 1, � I fi I / ., 1 i. ,i.f /i /' % , % i y ,r�.%I �I/ i I' " .i ,,.. . r ,.i I I I / l� �,: ,: ,. �... � i.. .; Jf .. l I t � A} /.. ..../� �� i I.,... -.. rl�� II��I I , �� /� ��I% ,,!,, / �, ,• M ' p N � ` •� O 7777 $13 S33 00 ?ud NOSMV(3 GNI alb, r I W w i- F � U � Q o N CL z w LLJ: w Q p W OO O W Q: LO JillI .,, _... NO t� 0 z II lal U 0 0; I u LLJ 0- V) 0 J Q wa zW o� vi a � W � m z co a QD QD cr- LLJ CL: W W O cD z z o c� w a o J o 0 a cc LLJ Li Q o a >- w C) L w 0 a o = a m m z Q a = z cl� a ci oa (Z/3)WLLJ J oa C) Q w zo o � w Z� uj (.D_ J Q W CL Q J ❑ln I —j Cc cc Cc Z: C.,L: LLJ U� CIS Cd l< Ld LLJ LLJ V) Ld Ly ::D C� C- Z uj -j LLJ cr- CC V) LLJ --j Q:: V) V) CC Llr) LL- C) Q LLJ LQ CIL C) Q Ln QD u L -Li W C) LLJ u LLJ 0- V) 0 m Do on 00 CIO on on OD cu cu cu cu lz It x x CID CID CID M in CID CID CID :3 E E E E E E E cn —S —S —S —S cd X M M v CC CID CID CID CID lz x x lz x cc CID CID CID CID s m m m co co m co CID m m CID m -- X X -- d� X X a a a CO a 00 0 00 Co 0 0 Co 0 u U C-) u u u u u LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO O ca V E co co m co x On -- x 02 On 0 co U LO M cn cn M M 0) M 0) 0) 0) 0) zm zm M m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mm QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ 6 6 6 C) 6 6 6 6 6 j j j j 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 CN m -zl- m w m co co CD 00 -1- w m m zl- m zz �� zz -2z -2Z C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C_J C7 C7 C7 m Ln Ln v -0 CD 3: V M 0) Im m CL CL 6 6 6 6 6 - iD N C7 C7 0 u w u v L) m E >� u 0 a, m V E v 0 co CL u QJ N V) -U .2 -a L) ad IN -3 0_ CO cL E V) w m Im u mc m C) C) lu u CO m E m M 8 M CD lr� :3 L) YJ L) • NN :5 U m M m Li u) -a u _— > cu — F L, C) �s _-o C, Oj LU M m V u t nc -0 = 3, L)fa E 2 > m Vl 5. u x < 0 c on di < m V m E u It C, Ln L) Q) 48 41� -2 0 u in t o 2 m a m 73 CIE — u , -= u -L 0 LZ ES w E -0 m 8 > u L= vl o �le E m u a, cc: CM, -0 0 E A) , in m m V u m E m - aj 0 E U U E m L U :t E t -0 8 L' > E m m u -0 CL m — u 2 - M 48 % U E E c- u z v -L) E CL m 0 77- u L) < Lt Ln Ln CC < 0 < v u u L) O E m 0 u im Zo 'Ei g �; 0 3: LA 2 m -, u E m= i -u E E M = m 0 4,� V) CL- ]z d m d C7 Cl- Ln > LU < a- J -V > m CL. -.- IN m al E s 0 <0 m v 12N UJ r c - L, p c M M C C M 0 E v u -8 -t E V) 8 -u 0) m > 4J QJ x j:: u u > t -2 7) u E m rl- _0 M -u V M m 'F� U Q, p E m m U LZ m CL E m m m m r U - - - -�n C-) m m 'E Ll Ll rl CL 0 co F E 'E - m C, v m V 76 M 'C' > u -E E E LU CL 0 m m On m E U - C5 m 7;-- C S m :3 u LE -E `5 _5 2! M; 0, i7i m u Ij o u m �u -0 m s x 0 V, -u c-,, 0) - E -2 0 L c co U , - E um 2 'E c' -2 m 8 M �m 4C� 0 -M UJ m 2 -�S 0 CO 0 L, MO .y -0 v v m V E m m < < (D 0 V u m L C-1 m E m y E 0)-2 E E co m m < L) Ln m 4, :"C� M_ 8 m m m :3 s L L j Lj Q- If m m m m EL 'D u m E =0 , x EEOFOFOFTU� mm m in 0 = E -S -S -2) 0 E m 5, 5, 5, 5, C, CL. Q- Ln Ln La E -0 v w EEo �x x x F-- F-- F-- = U m -�; E mu E E E 2 m - < V, . 'u, :1 t !�;� -, - V) v C-' c O'j m m -2 E E -uo E m m m -S m L" 2 o o 8 :;z < (D 2z 0- cr: Ln un L,) L L, --o -E = E m 0 C) U < • < < < (D co C) L,) < •- ILL im C, CD CL. (D CZ. a- CL. CL. V) > < o- CC) < u < r� u cc V) V) CL. Lu 0 F-• rL � CL 0) 4EL U CL M v m -E -C D m C) U• CL 4FL —j Cc cc Cc Z: C.,L: LLJ U� CIS Cd l< Ld LLJ LLJ V) Ld Ly ::D C� C- Z uj -j LLJ cr- CC V) LLJ --j Q:: V) V) CC Llr) LL- C) Q LLJ LQ CIL C) Q Ln QD u L -Li W C) LLJ u LLJ 0- V) 0 LLJ U z LLJ LL- L -Li Q) LLJ LQ LLJ 'n z LLJ (D �< Q":z V) C) co CL QD uj CLl< CL ca a- CL co oj� CL CL CL u Ne :7D --i .... .... .. L -Li ca LLJ �N 0 U I VAN N u LaJ V) 0 q "wq avq ao f� q oaq V"a Z7f,q u rk Nq'q w q aid„ fit u LiJ0- V) 0 IN moo" PON u LiJ0- V) 0 Lij -0 JO n ry < n 75 � z D 0 5 w w w cn �dONVS lV15N SSVB 215101OSldI M1S�S HANIM1SV M1S:S : NOOOVB SVAn &i `i2nixIS 2151Md]d SVIB dAd '3N01S N31SSS ONIOIS 213815 OS1NIdd isdn00 IOVI 1NOH55ao1S 03HSINI1321d ONISIV21 ONV ONHH 1HOIS SSX08 /M ONIIIVH 03HSINI53bd 1SVO 1NSM3 NIV210 DOOM w w a a z o " Q o w J H— w Q �N Q 3SVNVIS H3M10i IIV15a MININMV 03HSINIA5 d t -,ll t -,l "o -j[ O-jl � o -- A , //// / ru �;i, Q U) CD O z D J J J mV ' w �U) 00 J ry W W z � O Cn 75 W J n Q Vi Ilflflml001mYn 5 ■I■I■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII : ■IMI■ ■■■ ■ ■■ ■� : ■I■I■ »w u...m� � .� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�1,„Illlllllllllll ollllllllllllll �lr�� ■I■I■■I■I■I ■I■I■I MINE uuuuum�i�i� ■■■ ON NMI &I'INM iSVD OEM m ■IMI■ ■IMI■ MI■ ■Son on ■� ]� ■IMI■ ■IMI■MI■ MEN Em ■I■I■ Son ■IMI■ lool ■M . ■I■I■ „ �IIIIIIIII�� III�I��I��;�� IIIA n�� i�im��lllll�»»i��IIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIiIIIIIIIIII��UI��!��PII[IIIIII�116 ■II■IIIIIIIIl ll��llllhill�llllllll'iilllllllhl_ llllll'illllllllhi� ■I p ■I=III IM=II ■=I ■ -I -1I I;CDWN■IMI■ MI=u uluuluuuul� �� uuluuuuul� �� uuuuuuuuu �� uuuuluu-� ■I■I■ , i uuuuuuuiuuuuuiuuuiu uuuuuuuuiuuuuuiuuiu� uuuuuuuiuuuuuiu�uu uiuuuuuiuuuuuiu�iiui �� ■I■■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ■I■I■ �,,,,„�� m,,.�� Ill mm'rn i iiii1111111A lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll °�IIIIIUIIIIf ■I■It ■I■It ■I■It■■I�IIi111iiiiiiii�°I°I��IIIIIIIIIII��''"�'��(��imill' cn ■I■It ■I■It I■It uw, z El ■I■I■ ■IMI■ ■I■I■ ■I■I■ ■I■I■ ■I■I■ NEI \I_II ■I_II A , Q U) CD 0 z D J J J mV ' w �U) 0ry 0 W W z � 0 Cn 75 W J n Q -------------- __._._._.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ _.- Q U) CD O z ❑ J J J ❑ , mV ' w �U) 00 J ry W W z ryO W J n Q D I mV ' w �U) 00 J ry W W z � O CO 5 D I mV ' w �U) 00 J ry W W z � O Cn 75 00 UU VoW zW w J= - U O< Q C) N 00 o T =0 1 U C J � � VmU� o� W� CD Q W� C-) w w w U) -q N �µ ¢ M O H O N / N M N d BUILDING A AREA SUMMARY (GSF) FLOOR RESIDENTIAL COMMON PARKING RETAIL TOTAL 6 30,080 4,969 0 0 35,049 5 30,080 4,969 0 0 35,049 4 30,080 4,969 0 0 35,049 3 30,080 41969 0 0 35,049 2 27,191 22,871 * 0 0 50,062 L2 0 3, 410 20,479 0 23, 889 1 (L1) 0 8,067 27,847 14,148 50,062 LL 0 953 35,590 0 36,543 TOTAL 147, 511 55,177 83, 916 14,148 300, 752 *NCLUDES 15,013 SF ROOF TERRACE OVER PARKING BUILDING A UNIT DISTRIBUTION TABLE FLOOR UNIT STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED COUNT 6 39 8 25 6 0 5 39 8 25 6 0 4 39 8 25 6 0 3 39 8 25 6 0 2 36 6 24 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 192 38 124 30 0 0 10%%%/ „1 !° ��1it °I ` ARC H I T E CTS 222 SOUTH MORGAN STREET, SUITE 413, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60607 P. 312.850.4970 F. 312.850.4978 WWW.STUD10222ARCHITECTS.COM MAPLE STREET LOFTS - BUILDING A MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS N fo tao E O N L N E 4- _g_ - to to L b.0 c m In N cu � N M O 0 O II 2 U N Q O C CL > -0 ++4 Ln E E y +, d c N In E n L p 7 n N_ Ln L L L m i N E sz m N N O N E c c tC � .hA N CO L `�:: rl by 0 ci W m •N i Q S2 i N N Ln 3 0 o m m _pLn -1 ri rl N 4- Ln Q Q M N 'O O Mo 0 =3 rn rn m p O a a Z Z N t t — c _+1 + # LLv # a a y c m Z S2 io C N 'p N N L N E _ N L — CA >;> .N -c Q o 0 Z N � N a U) Lo W J # M M ri Ln Ln 0a a o N CL L L a O Ln v Q z �I z N omo -1-1 m Ln 0 N Q C] N C7 LU bA Z (r L c U W on m oc v c L � L L J = 'N C1r m O N Q J J N T M C•n W Ln (D O �j vi ELn O (� r -I _ - 00 O N u — i O Q Q E O N JLn- J +' '} a) C w w c Ln c Ln Q LL 0 fL' Q w V Z c -I c -I Z DO N -1 r -I :t m M N M Ln M 4 LT O c4 M O O O O O O r -I -1 O N N N N M O lD M O O N� u1 0 O LO Ln z LU Z W Z z W z z 0 0 0 O 0 O a a a w 2 w 2 w w 2 w w (A U Ln U Ln Ln V Ln L/1 Z � O a H H U e LL u c N e Ll a U N N VQ bb.0 u m 52 m a Z f2 7 O o C a Z o u (D (D Ln U H > ._ m u O Q N c U N C6 N Z LL v .� i - Q N `n O N N O C F- N Q Q m Ju aC U V M c CA W 0 W H �E E � a I N a N F 1 N m N L CL p L i 1 Z Y CL N c I Q N Q r_7 c — U I m O 1 � C: CU C Ln E�) L p E I (D Q O V) 2 Q ; i 2 (D V O 3 s O U Ci +r E_ (O N N ] L f +J O LnS Q c + N OU N E Nf6 +1� N i z bA C Q N + O f 0 U } C f v Ln N N -0L O 'A c O 0E +N+ E N f p < L < v 7 3 N Ln = c +J O O U c S r -I f bn ' p } f L v O N 4f1 Q c io C N 'p N N L = C M Ln 41 s a +' n fo O L S 3 00 Ln .- L 4- } N U N N ?� L O S N O Ln L < O (11 OLn N L O L N s O N 4 LnCZ` Ln Ln +' 1 N fu E fo c iZ +� p N L �N N OU v O + N C Co C (U O (6 O O N .N rn v < c �O (� f co Ln Q E 3 +' N E N c U .f u E O s n c vi Ou ro Q L2 Z N bA < Ln E c c co + N L J J N o -N w 2 LUIL ) x Ln w� c LU = i N O = O 3 S ro ro _ + 3 is p s N in > p Q U # # 3i Lo O i X a Ln LL N v # a # L L _ L� L L � QL L \ L t \ rl o rl N \ \ \ # \ \ In In i Q L Q Q L L L ) L L O m m z z N O N r -i N r -I Q L L L L L L L t Q= L L L == L L O M m M M O O N c -I Nr -I N r -I -zt -1 O (-I O LO Lr) Np O O 00 O O� w Lo ^ O Ln Ln r -i r - z z °; O °; Z O O O a N a LU w 2 ro 2 w Ln Ln V H V Ln N Ln L L to L L c c E� O O c O 0-00 :+-+ N N U U `� bA X c i X C L i (o c w UJ N vI i 52 u v O O O a]U U L c +� Ln O O > 'n — O O >- m LL of ro E 3 Ln i +' f6 E N E c U N O c O U LU L Of Ln J O U C S1 O u U O L 3 � X U N U c O C LL. < c Q — Oa Q O ( w >` j CO L N u >� N Cr fu O O +- ' N N c U j z v)0 v) U Q .- m U m N O j 0 N Q Z N Q = a C:in Q Q U — 7 QN H sz L2 U U 'O O u � N Z O D = Cb Q m M O N _O O Ln w Lv1' N ]= Q Cr wZ [L M N Q Q CL C3 N Q N N f�L6 _ Z 0 fo O d U 1 0- o- C Z=) n Q L2 Z N N sz O LL .� O <r j O O J C7 (D E00 J U o LU V)i �O LU X c m -N w 2 LUIL j m 1 m Z Lan � 7 ■ Q U, C Z.2 J M� L W c LL C/) OL LL C Oa Ja W LLJ ry C G W J a. C� G �^ O o v J C:) OU fD UOU Z W H w J U O� Q _ Q N v0 U � Um w� QOo r- w� W -I- (f) (f) OC) UI Q� M LL qj ade:Z. "I Lij -0 _j 0 n ry < n 75 �- z D 0 5 00 U) LU C) LLI N N N C) C) LU U) K LLJ U) .0 z < co (D ry LL: 00 o ocio no -j. s "V9� -T,o o� Z3 -13- a 0 U. (D c Z D C LL C/) OL LL c 0 i a OL LU LLI LU -i n i' „b—,LL T „b —,ll "V—,ll T J, 1' j "I a 0 U. (D c Z D C LL C/) OL LL c 0 i a OL LU LLI LU -i n C�3 Ef 'C 3dNbd1N3 dNNdvd ]303] d3M0] o -,z9 Q U) CD 0 z 0 J J J mU W u) W LL 00 J n W z W D �0 W J n Q U z� LU J= - U 6 CDQ N U N = 0 U � U� mN ry QU)� �T BUILDING D AREA SUMMARY (GSF) FLOOR RESIDENTIAL COMMON PARKING RETAIL TOTAL 7 9,616 1,798 0 0 11,414 6 9,616 1,798 0 0 11,414 5 9,616 1,798 0 0 11,414 4 9,616 11798 0 0 11,414 3 9,616 1,798 0 0 11,414 2 7,312 5,610* 0 0 12,922 1 0 1,880 11,042 0 12,922 LL 0 1, 373 11,549 0 12,922 TOTAL 55, 392 17, 853 22, 591 0 95, 836 *INCLUDES 1,508 SE ROOF TERRACE OVER FIRST FLOOR PARKING BUILDING D UNIT DISTRIBUTION TABLE FLOOR UNIT STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED COUNT 7 11 1 6 4 0 6 11 1 6 4 0 5 11 1 6 4 0 4 11 1 6 4 0 3 11 1 6 4 0 2 10 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 65 5 40 20 0 0 10%%%/ „1 IARCHITECTS 222 SOUTH MORGAN STREET, SUITE 413, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60607 P. 312.850.4970 F. 312.850.4978 WWW.STUD10222ARCHITECTS.COM MAPLE STREET LOFTS - BUILDING D MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS MAP[ STREET ,0 f"I LA J a Z W Q o - O L Q C7 W Up Z 1= (C) L c W w mC W Cl)A C: Y J 7 ' n n ro CC O co d Q J Ja ir) `^ \ E ' 0 O a O Q LnL L a J } a O r -t w a w O Q W V r1 r1 z 1�1: c -I M N N1 Ln M S O -1 O O O O O M M N M O M OM 0 )d1 OC CIC OC Lf O o o oLLJ a a a LUL x` w x w w x ut U V) V Ln V) U C Q v F j M N Y � O L L `n 2 v S ^s Co - Z � Lr) ro L e 5 N v O ro ui 6 C cn V, L o E co 'N O D a L +, C i = O Lii 2 Q L L _ (D c * L LLn C) ri N L L a L s o s t \ \ s = CYl O M H M Z z ri O N cI N a O 4-) V) O In D 00 O z o w v) IOLO E O a ) f S ) ) ) 7 ) A L co LD � O . Z f ) m N p v `n C 0 f a C u r E a � v7 cc o u c O C N ) j N u1 fo L � L C M C ! O a I - v CO E a V) V1 L � O S s c'7 7 C L O � N V) L s L Q) a f ECO C 5 'O A C i L } p �O o0 m T M L i .� N V c O M V O N c -I a Ln Q c J0 O nj f : O M orn L L d C L A., w LJ O a _ Z e O s +-+ + Mo Co Z 7EL (B 3 a a += a a L `~ UA X c i X C fB C W W CL C fro v Q) O a E .E a M r I L L d U- rr-I .r -I z vLl Ln E a _ 0 0 C: Ln N Ln Ln co O Ln 00 O N O Ln N 000 m L C7 W Up Z 1= (C) L c W w mC W Cl)A C: Y J 7 ' n n ro CC O co d Q J Ja ir) `^ \ E ' 0 O a O Q LnL L a J } a O r -t w a w O Q W V r1 r1 z 1�1: c -I M N N1 Ln M S O -1 O O O O O M M N M O M OM 0 )d1 OC CIC OC Lf O o o oLLJ a a a LUL x` w x w w x ut U V) V Ln V) U C Q v F j M N Y � O L L `n 2 v S ^s Co - Z � Lr) ro L e 5 N v O ro ui 6 C cn V, L o E co 'N O D a L +, C i = O Lii 2 Q L L _ (D c * L LLn C) ri N L L a L s o s t \ \ s = CYl O M H M Z z ri O N cI N a O 4-) V) O In D 00 O z o w v) V 00 N r'I Lf) D N i -C O 00 O L M N O r -I N N \ \ \ \ \ L L L L L m L L L -C L a M M M O O N a Np L \ i L -CLr) O Ln c -I r -I o0 Ln O O z O w V, 00 O z O w V) Or z O w V) lfl cfl ca cI W O a v a x co U H � ^ O w Z O a a x w U Ln V) E O O C O O L .L O •� •� O O (B 3 a a += a a L `~ UA X c i X C fB C W W CL C fro v Q) O u u N C C O O LOw u m C (o 4L v7 V - U L) L 4- O O O O +� E bA c 4 L C a U � a C a O C O J U L LV7 O O c C O O Ua) L x Ln O o U ro o C O c W U O - a 4-a J a 3 U 0 u a 7 N m O a a Q U. Z CLN a t v ro O bn C:z )O J v) Q O N U v) Q Ln a m •Ua D a .7 Z L O H O v c H a O O - a a U O v C:O z r cc a a o yUf6 j m H J M a m H LU pC M N o O N z -0 Ln 0 0 Y J v O Q ro nj - Q Q Q Q w co O N U N a Ln CL s z a a C) a v O Q L W cu O of m p 0 Q O Soo J C7 C7 G O O J C7 0 D X c m O w 2 L1 d i m Lu LU Q cc cn Z a Ln tD X sy w 1� ■ 0 U, V C Z 0 D L,, C/) Ln v / I..L U, LL C Oa Ja W W �C Cn G W nJ 75 OO C:)o O U) U 5(-)Z W H w J U o� a N Q (14 0 U � Um w VJ Oo H w w r- � O �Ilu UI Q� M LL Lij -0 JO n ry < n 75 � z D 0 5 U) C\j CY) CY) F— z acF- 0 0 LL U) z 0 ui z 0 M LL C/) z 0 w I w 0- rr I -- U) OC0 U) CY) z Z) C\l z D 0 2 LL 0 LU (D a C/) z 0 w I w 0- rr I -- U) 0 U) CY) z Z) C\l z D 0 2 LL 0 LU (D a W L) C/) C\j (Y) Cl) z rr 0 0 LL z 0 CO co w w 0 U) ui cc 0 ui z ui > C) LLJ F— z rr co CL U) Z 0 Q w F— z 0 cr LL U) F— U- 0 -j F— w w cr- F— C/) w F - z :3 0 2 All If 1� C� LLZ�Z oo7-w wZ�W w z�oZ J W 1- _ w ooC3 Orzo o¢ow ccao� d } w a 4 4 Q a v C5 0 wZU)w m =Zo J U Wizzz 4 ui Dmv�w Z W p co ¢ zm w 0 LL, Fes- z�� J doom¢ U Z o W - J a [C CO LU a z w F- CC C/) 4 2 W LL _l 0- w Q 2 z O Q zz bZ /' W O 0 W(7 ILL JVJ rte' W Cz O K Y.] a. Z O O F K rr ct z2 w a vu "� m z O � K 2 C: o O 5' 1i i.a GSAS 21- .1, Z � Q C9 Ol ZI U n M �F `r / I v rt ' Y.p [C >w> N�N LLI w Q xi T C1 IIIIIIIIIII v L' C9 N N O N 0 �o 0 Cjq CQZ <t > 0 "' LLJw z J w¢ W >� LU rr o f Q F Lli rro co W� Y aN„ C7 w c 1 LD— 0 W W o W r J CO 4n W 0.4 LU 0 Me 9 LLJ 0 < < (7) ��k k cc X < = C? ....................... 0 oi LU 0 9 CL IlLij ----------------- n la- ry "I LLJ, 77 cD tl 04 ILL] C2� IT ....... ...... TT,." 1111 II CL IlLij ----------------- n la- ry "I LLJ, 77 cD 04 ILL] C2� IT ....... ...... TT,." CL IlLij ----------------- n la- ry "I LLJ, 77 cD 04 ILL] C2� IT TT,." LU U) CD 0 rz aJ J 0�F- LU ~ Z D �O 075 U Q W (n w- w oQ Qo z - Q J (D (D N� ZU Q 7w 0�F- LU � ~ Z 2EO 02 U Metra Parking Phasing Plan STEP 1: May 2019 Provide 100 spaces in the Village Garage for Village resident Metra commuters. Approximately 300 yard walking distance from the garage to platform. Metra Parking Phasing Plan Metra Parking Phasing Plan STEP 3: July 2019 Preserve 120 Metra commuter parking spots on the south end of the existing Metra lot while demolition is performed to the north end to make way for construction of the new garage. Metra Parking Phasing Plan w w ll "1D3dSOacJ '1W z n I a > w '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSONd '3 LU 421 0 ,b z 3(13lIbb/3AC� > p 51J0I 133?J1S 31dbIN a w W U W r' c C) 11 C ui N NOd S1N3W3/�O&IM 9NRI33NI9N3lt/Nld J H U � (1) LL o �-O� z a W J � LU o ~� LLJw � LLJ a z � Cl) OZ5 LLJ Q w J � J � W a Qz aU) LL O rya w 5� G Z 0 1 U 0 J LU z o LU LU LU 06 m (=7 w z F--L)O LU LULU U m oU' ¢ ii w W ZJ ~ ❑ Y¢ W a w LU U - z 0 (=7 O J❑ W LU Y a ¢ cc z m a o O F m J ❑ a w W w w¢ w w 3 LL w c� H D w ❑ ¢ � w U V) <n Z C 2 F w x li O O ❑ rY Z z z C7 w cn W w � � U W } ¢ U) a} D g ¢ O F F U z U z Oo O O � d' W O ❑ } 0-' W ¢ w' w Z Q Z W W W ¢ Z ¢ J p K J > a O U ¢ ¢ z w O z z O� z w Q J J o< w p w a a> O O _z ❑ D w w� U W O ¢ J H¢¢ w H O¢ J ¢¢}¢ J¢ J> O O¢ ¢ LU U x❑ a a V) 2 U O W 0 O w co ❑ 0 U >>= C7 W a LL O a (7 2 2 U) a \ \ z a � S o 0 0 O w x Qo D OQ ®© Q ®i7 0 (� g 4 0 o S ',2 o 0 JJ 2 V k J Z Z� O R O 4�I O � U 2 � � m h,- Q � p O J J J Q U h �y b"Z W J Q U J W O W U U W W W h O ��g�°m=W��000aa�c°��°, � � W � W �Wceio rD IIII � ;l, 111,1001,11,1:3 el A/vIlli'll 111/411, CO W LU Z U) LL 0 X LU 0 Z Q W o(n0 C�j ��Z 0 W 0� 0 0 OZ U) J 0 0— U�J Z(n Z�Z I i J V Z Z Z Q Q Q Q~ Z Z J J J J J— W Q Q J J J J W Z LL 0 Q J J W 0 Q Q J W <<-> W 0 0 0 0 0000QQQzZ:3 0000 2 0~ Q J J 0 C� C� 0 0~ 0 0 z W O J 0 U U 0 � U U U UNN LU LU O 0 O 0 0 Q Z U (n Cn (n (n (n (n � Cn Cn U) U) (n (n (n U a z J 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 W 0 0 0 O 0 0/ Q J J Q J J W W Q J Jt= U U U U W Z (n W W J J W � Lei W W W W W x> W W> W W 0 0> W W LL (n o W O 0 0 O 0 0 (n (n O D 0 O (n (n (n (n O r O N M O N M O N M O N M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Woe-WTWwoo Q0mQmQw� W H Q W a w } Z) W O W m U Q U cnOQO�cn<<W LL, , p 0 WO - w _ Lu L 0 wHO>pWwp� OWZ—w= QOQp>�ZOW ZZUpopC7 Z OO w z W Z W O U m Z Q a~ J U LuD-O�O3W b H J� Z z W= W' LL:��vQ�v�w W Z W J 0 W Z W Z w°Qo�zo�° opWzC)0OZ w Q p� w pQ O W w WmW �z HO w Op -<<zU)w _z LL, <LL n Q � C5 LL, O S W J Y O Q W zi m6OmU �Q p�OW w ZU�2��pw� WmZ U Z U W W ? � W OD�mcnp��w LL z w w a W W O fA �j J Q O� Z W Lu w�F-z�0Q0�c7 co z w LnLu ><FLL -wzz Q F�Q0-cco0 Lu< o H w 0 a 3: 3: t I ll'ID3clSOacJ'iVY vi LU - .. � ig �� ,� z - I 11 11 I > > �-, 'IS IldVVY 'S '? '3AV IDIcISOacl 'I - I 11 11 11 I "I" ' ' 0 I'll - ''I'll ''I ," 11AID , <W ui .- W I I , 11 D� w .F. I ,j ff"""","�Ill","""",""",l""II'll,�""Ill,""",""",ll,ll""Ill","","",","�, � - " I �11,� I,-,- � , 't LU - � �- , - l'bo., W,��,��,��,��,��,��,M/ �.- .0 I �, N -a 10 M/ (1) LLJ � ��, . Z (D Q9 0 - � -j < ",-f l/////////ma////// � _N 0 ) 0 , �,, ��l, , O& / , � < - 11 M, ,//,8,,8/,,/�,,o ,421 A o < ,� m 4 I L,5 U I ��, � =� �.- I ----l-, 61C - U) �� 1 - "" //4 ,,,,/,,f,,,"*�, �5 -, � Q-, vi U- ��,,� -- , sl,llgwi/,,,,�,,,,�,,,, /// ,� � � . - ,,� 2 - JE LU LU D > - "'E < V) . . Z �- LU - E- ( Of �� 86 ,., � 2 ,� � �:�� I Lu 0 LU �� Q -,'-. 1� 0- ,� UL Ll C) � N N Y�M 1 NOJ SININIAO&IM DNIN31NIDN3 IVN a rT El !) Nf :) I&- , m � SIJOI i33NIS 31clV u ."//,///////////",///",Vvlzzzzzzz/////////////// 11 - I li I I 0 Z v) -----.m LU LU LU LU T , 0 < co T �- :� LLJ 1: 2 T F-- 0 2 �- F-- LLJ � > - < < W, -� C-) > 0 LU Z < w of F: , . ()� , (If 11)) 0 � � C� . 1:: 0 Ro Te R L�u t 0. >, - (.) -.. co LU F-- Q LU IL -U) L- �z i7- ,(- Z< L,U -) LU 'o =-� z co 3: 0) T �- a: 2 LU z IL LL, - �- F-- Z � ) < 0 m Lq , [T � 0 0 z CL of LU U) G� 0 0 Q) CI- w < . iE ,z LU IL L) - j .. ,-, i <- z , 0 LLOJ O LL - c � Of L>z -LL, A� 6- -,- ., .. � ,z U) �L) (1) - ,o 2- - w -: , � o - F CO CO LOL 9 3: ,- fl-,� >. 16 o - - , .,c,, 0, -, ,< z 7E � � = x < ?�: �- �- �- �,- C) Z, -,O::) .-; 0. � C20 -, zo -Lu LO) z -2�( ,,, -, - 'L - LL, :7 - -i lz M: 2! z ,<o 2mi �; o ,WL m< ::� E: m , 0 T u ,-) 0, ,-- - ,,� ,W 3; c , , 0. LLL 02, ,,, -L, �i � LU ,- �-: E � L) , L 2 > z � 'i � L, 5 0, 0- Uzi Lu ,-, , 0� D z > L, - , LU 0 - m > 0 , 1, ,�,, LU 0) =� L = L. 8, co :R Es LL), ,,�, ll� a: �L-L, t�: 55 L.L, -Z ,-, < d L u = :2 - (,) M, -Z " < sz, L ,-- ,o " , LL, ,o " >- < , 2 - p - � - -n > - �, - 0. "L om . n LL, x Z L a- z o 0- �- z L) m -) Lu LU D LLJ 9 � � P > LL z , D M D > w = LLJ , , < w Z - ,o o 'o, w C� �- O I L) < � 510� yj - 2 > , p 0. . oz Lzu _L -U OZ - I - WLL, -, ,L,L�, ,�,�� L� LZL, L,Ll 5 LL, 7: -< !? - 0) w 00, c) ;� LI) �� L,u 2� z ,.,) -L � co < = - , < >- �- z < LIZ 1: ,:�j 1<1 Z< L<) 0. LZL, � z , < ,o �, " 0 � :0� 0, U,) 0, >. >z 11 �, - � e�.z L) m 0 ,� 3 LLJ LU LU �i < < Lu z z U) - g, ", ,< zo >. L,u L) , --, 0� u L zi C,) 'LL 0) s W, LL, O, � '. ,<, Cc) '. :-:, uj � 0 . ,0, � ,� LL, < , �-2 :.:) LL, L "') z F-- ,- 16 LL, �� z 0 = c) z (D - z 0- 0 = L,L, 11) ,< (D ,E LU z Lu �- < LL, LL, I ,L,L), ILDU P,: �,� L -U Lz) >0 ,�L E LL o U) F-- , .>f z .. .- L P ,=,, � :M-1 !Q ;� 0 G,� ,o 'D � 1 2 ::) 1,1� 0� �c d N . 3: L) . LU - �- LIL, " LZL, LLf Z W z - LU Z� < . � ,L,Li 7: < < 0 � 0 zo Z) ,L,L), U) -:) -. -. .< L -u ,-, L -L, 1" Co �2 � >- = CD z = �- : - �� M , , G� 0 a 2 Lu - z 2 P: . P<: -� '. ,O::) 2� LU "D ol - <, - T , , LU 2ZE m! LU LL � ,,- � ir (� � > 7 < 2 -,) Qz 2 �- (,D �f LQU2 L,U �2� �- 01 0� 3� 0- z LU < � = I-- 0� <� ") ,. ,-) ,,,� .< ,-- ,n .0 ,< 0� � 5 LLJ , > w LLI 0 3: 2! ,-) - �5 , �� 0 G� " , 0 Lzu 0 , 0 , - . " - 'o - L. - z , . 7 0- 0 LL ol z z 9) - Lu L,u 3: , Z �- < 0 ,< -, :', z Z< ,L,u 1 zo 0 �- z = - - . ,) , � z 0 , z , L) , � ,L,u CL,L), -, Z, i(-: , o p Lz L- ) : si, - , S u ,< Cc) Q,� 0,� �- L 10 <> 2< z � IL (D . 0 F-- z F-- 0- � q:� 2,E = �E - w U5 <, �- ,o ::) LU , �- E =< < 0 :1 CD 'Llj" K - �- U) � K 0 LU ,u U<) < - C-) L LZ z 0� 0, LUL), 2E LL, L,,: -< 1: � K 0 1: 3: 0 7< � � (ZD 0 Q� 0� Q� z � L,L L3= q - 0 (") OCL - LU �- - � < < 11 : ,-- " 'LL, E to I-- 0 Lou ,LLI " c) )- � 2-i 5; -, ,. .LL, " -_,- I-) 9 -, o ,O ZE -< -< -W w ,Z) I " Ly U,, , 2 , >- 0 0� ,L,L' LL, U<, ,) =U I = �-LL, 0 z 0 0 & b T Lu 3: co LL F-- L) L, � Z< L 20 �>- 9 0<� 'O = LL OZ 0< Z LL, I = 0 , LLI j: ' ' . . �� M: L , , . , LU 3: 0 - , z o ,,z ,-, O, =j - ) LL LL, T � � ,-- 5 3: LL, .-I :-:, 0 ,= ,:,)) , LL, t C 1) * LL, � F-- 2� �< �i ( :::, oz - , , 'L 'm 9 ,o z Lu - LU - LL1, I. .0 - � �: z �� lol� L,Ll �� < cn z LL] 0 t, ,<, ) � � � �� L=U - Z T cl (-) :� , - - ;,�): � -, 0� <:: (D U) L.L, � ,2 - � ,= q F , LU . , L'. <- . >= , ll� U, t , �.- LU l< I. m Q� L�L, - < Z < < = < z L,Lj 11 0 � >- 7i 7 (<, <, < t - . z t 2 .. ,2L 2 ;� :�E =! oe �,, -, 5 'L 3i � Z: U) 0 Q �: 2, Z, Z5 < I-- i�: L,Ll o � LOL, L,u :� Z,, o 7 z - L ,-, >, <, �. ", , 2, LL, c , �: � . .< 7, o , z -) , 6� j ,O) tU g . - ,) < , (z T " , ') 't - < Lu ca < �- o 7) , of 0 co I lco) 2E Tu �<e 9 21 lol� <Z LU LU � ,o -, ,-,- -, M -�- �- LL -, a ! LU ::) o �- �- LLUU 0 (n F-- 2 LU - - 7 z z U) " � 7 ,D < Q� , �- ,- �: - - < , 0- LU � � , . . 'o �- 0 m LL ,L,- L -U I., �- (if �5 1: - 0 � ,Z) 21- U.) 0� zo 0. < m U) M: LL < 0 Lu 0 , 3: , ,-) ,:�i ui ,z >- 2= -L, LE -u 2 >. k =R L -- 7- - ' C, = I ',_) aj N '2L 0 �> L'L�j 0 , Z< 33:: 02 9 � �02 LCL,, -,� =-,,� O, " (o -� -) (< - - . Lu ,� ,z -- ,� o . = -) <. =� 'o LU (f) �- 0 >- � =, " , �7 LL, ,,� = .< (Z' - -. ,.,I <Z LIL, (LLD, T:: "I � ,-- W. .- I .W< - ,I > Z- <. ,- ', -< �-: ,-, 1-: Zo ,.L - - 0 < -z- -2- -Z T, s �- U) ( -) ?: <- 71 ,o �<: U.) -Z 2�, � � L: - - 0 - I I , , m ,-- < ,- zi5 = 0 -� ,o � 0 L,Lj . L,L i . 0 3: Z< 10, L,L i <, Lou - m Z: L,U �-- u - , [(-D � § 0 3: � 8- < F-- Lu . LL), o 0� � LLU) z< U-) z< ,-o � =0 ,- ,. z< L� g E d :.:) �, �i U<) (,.�) -, 5,7 LL, - LL, - ,0,1 I - � � U) - x Cf) -< -< C) z E) m 0, - �,- - z Z) �� z LL � 3: 3: M,: Z< (-) Fz LU , Lu � 0 �- 'L 2 -, LU LL z .2 � 3 ,O OZ >m 1, Z, lz �,�� . L <, .) . - �u -,5, :i m , ,o L-�: Lzu (.,) � -, - :�� 2 C) � - - - z ,�, g � 0. ,<) 2� L�u . . -Z .- 0- ,-, 2�: -, � 0- -Z ,.)f =, �E: L.0 20E Tu 2, ,- � L,L L.0 :� LL, U� (-) ,- ','f (Z' E05 , - iL ,D x D �- z z LL, c - ,-- ,-- -< -� Lu LL, Fs - .. P,: :0::� oz ELL, � 2 'Ll 0- LU �o ,) =, 0. 0::) :LEL, .z , � ,- Z< -, 'o'- C�,) K ;,� oz ,-L ,� LUL), ,.- ,-, ,,-, -< 06 C-,) ,< L,u - ,LOL, LL, I !, " ,o = I -, o 'LL', - w 1= w ", E5 , ( 2 2 L. cy LL, 0 3: 0 , " LU co 0 - :7 LU n� LL, ?: , 0 - o " � ��; M- � 3: 02 - - - " E 7 ow ,n� 0 , = 2 M, ,< O, IL Z< 11 - 2 - N 7 < Z) U) Lu (o z .) ,) 0 0- _ = . . _ _ (j 0 0 LU 0 , C) � Z5 z , C) o ,) L) � L) � 0 M L) L) . �, - - I-- E < E ;� ui E: �� 5; (ZD: , z , LL LU n < - �- :'::) �- :'::) ,. (Z' 2.� � �- Z- .,� =,� - 2 =, E: < 0 L,L, 0 L,Ll :�: LU z ,,- 1� - LL, � - < Lu , z . .- Lj L (D 0� z � (D < -L, � L� (n � �,� I 11L I 01 I =� - I 2 L>U �� -IL , ti m � ' ' N a: F-- C� C) U) (-,, E " o -- ,� >- E� L. ,-, ;: - , -,l ,< ,L,L�,, 0 , � .- � - 0 - - -. .,_ L) L L, - 0 < - 1� Q Lu z , - 5 �, � 0 0, 5, . z ::) �- L :,:: 0 T. L -L, 0,,� L,Ll U>3 ,<, 0. wo �,!) (<) ,-i (-, ,-) .. LL, = �: < Z-, - < 0 Z O ,:, z < [L af . , .0 L -u � 2 Lzu z< (.) � z G� Lu [If co LU LLJ LL, Z , LU LL, It � � , , , . - - Z< 0-� 0- 7 (OD 2� LL, 2 ,� LL, z o 2 I < - zo .f L,U:: t c) = (0) <, - � = �. - no � 'L . (-) ( . < � - - � 'T - = z 7 U) z - - -- - ,- � .L< �, �- () . < , z . 'L L, �, , z : = L U Z 0 7< m U: i<l , (6 X W LU , Lu ,- - 0, LL - Lu ,j .- I , ul () , 5 2 7 LU 0 < 5 z ::) m - - w , ,- . . , :� , , �,- L) � C) U) � � �- , 0 - , Lu o = o o z �- � � �- Z, K Z) 0� F-- af F-- 0 � LLJ Lu Q� > LU - < - LL, ,. �2 " 2 0 0 z 0 z - , , = L) 0 ( Lu >- t: LU Z< LU IF -0 0 -) (D 0 0 C) -) i, . - I ( (L = ( I ") 51 -) c� � - Z �- Lu �- Lu -- �- -) co 0 c) � LL �2 � , , LL, U) z C) 2 (-) 2 L) 2 Lu Lu < z w < , � < C� � LU LLJ < � --� F 0 z � = I � � , 0 Z LU LL, 11 ! � 2: < 0 0 LU < �- < �- < < LL, Z C) Z - 3: af z 0 � � � 0 � Df 0 � 0 � .. -, LZLI Z � < -- Z K �- � 0 af Lu 0 ,-- , <, , � ,< - , z 0 " -- '-- LL �- � � (-) LLI (.) Lu �- = 0 < z w Z LU u) C) - 0 LU Lu P: < � , , < -, , - , ii - T . - 1� T IL < 0 F-- z C) Lu C) o LU Lu Q� 0� Lu 0 2� -M <0 § ,S) LU L�Ll � . �, -. (LDU L. Z - z ,j �::) ,-- (I � LLJ 0 13 - ::, LL, , m , 'n -- 7i ,,- � w F C) - CE Z LU Lu C) E5 LU P zu) ,o F- � ,li � oll <z a- 0 �, w z 2 0 (D LLJ < Lu C) D Lu Q� o- o < 0 LU o - E C) LLJ 0 0 (D 2 = z co 0 0� co z 3: = < 10 ,Z) < -, - I < LU LU 8 0 o ... ) I p, , :,E �. � = 0 c L) Lu co (-) . 0� L) = 2 - Z) co z - < (-) � g U) . 0 z z z . , - (D Lu z � z o �- � 0 < < ). x , ::) ao � 0 Z LU U) L) - P: 2 , F-- �- w LU - � G� z 0 P < < =) 0� , 0� U) 0- � 0 [If M 0 � D 02 E < �- L [-- ca < < L) LL < (L L5 -6 � m x 7 0 U5 IL (D , m � X C� X (If Lu Lu E LLU < U5 � �- 2E ) �- Lu 2 cn 2 L) F-- < F-- < z z ,-- z LU � � Z C,f oz z 4 < . � Lou- 0 Lou- LU LU D 5 0 2 w � � � 0 0 U) < L) 0 L) Q (D (D 0 co L) (L < 2 < () LL U: 6 1: C� 1� 14 �i c6 I,: 16 L, � x 0 - z 0 a: 0 a Lu LU CO < CO LU E LU 0 EL E � Z CL Lu < < = = X 0 2 5 CL L) z 2 ::i Lu �- CL Lu - L) LU 0 91 �, � O- -- < K < o E < :-] x F (-) < LL F < LU M (-) F-- 0 L) LU 0� F-- z LL, = � < 1: x ir F- Z3 � LLJ :3 �- 0 2 z 2 L) .t� U) 31 �, C� u � W < 0 7i LL] 2 uj Lu = U) LU D L) < LU D- �- U) L) � a- L) Lu = � C� LL, C) � Z 0 LU 0� LL, 0 LU C) � p- c = � = LLJ F- 0 D 0 z = Lu � = = � z z u V) �- � (If 0 L) < (L IL - IL �- - D - 6 z 0 Ul �, 'i 0 0 = a� LU I-- 0 �,-) cf) LU � LU Oz , ,- . LU OZ CC) 6 ,>)f w 0 < � z = w = � < :) LU 0 LU 11 z z :-i = x <. w � :5 < < w < , E5 L -u y = = . � !�:, < , " != a � = w -7 ,-i L -i, ,-- '. , ow .. :� ( ( Ei - C6 . co E a -- 9 �- 0 ZD L)u , Lu , < - 3: z LU z - ,o I-- m 2 n- , 0� - 10 o = W, 'o L. Z C) F =, -�Z5 -, 0 w - 0 w 0 0 (D w = [Z W z �� 0 F-- LU � LU C) C6 g < - � - - � w z z . 0 , i L,u - LU 0 �- z, ,,f z E� E: , � z - [-- m 0 < LD c) 3 w - - - , , U, , �; P E5 .. -. ,- E5 0- �- -Z - z <. - ,- w o , o --, � � - < Lu - �� ,< .- ,-, .0� -, -u k< - W, 0. �,75 �3 CM, g- - m t ,z 0, z �, - G� w w o - 'L L e Lm D Z) 0 < = L,U � IL ,< 2E 11 � Zo LU Q� z [ t � � z - , U) 0� � >z 0 - u , - 2 z ,o �:�) z ui . ,L,- " - - UZ) ,= .0 21 I �2 :� 0 , :, < ,e LD z 10 v) m z . Lu - , w - -- w - - <- < u=, - � , w ) ,-, I � , z - � :Q:�:) U.J� Q ID :) 'Z cw) I "� 0- . 0 _ _ . 1', ::) . . ,, 0 L, �� MR < , . . _ < . m -- L, (D 2'E Z: - 1,2 , - E , ,L,U �l :2)i L�, z -< (.� -, , _ Z: . � L�, 2 ", w ,:� W ,< 2 0 � L.:: -W �-, 8) U7, Z< �R -, w (" ,-, - � 2 0 l< 'X < � �- O - Z z- ,-, 0< �: � � 1) 'Z Ow 0 < Lu I 0_ Lu C, o w w LD - g� . - L' L' ' '-- ' a' ' � - - -- 'o a C,) () Lu X 2 < 2 � . < w < ,� , = 'D 0 ) LU � LU 0 LU , y ,= E Lmu 0, �, 00 . , , , w ,� , -- o =, �- ,� 2 0 0 0, < . . LLJ 2i 0 � o w , ., �- < z 2 � C) (-, ,-, � LL W, Lu � , Z,E " 2 �<, 0 z ,< ,z 3� �- , z � �, Z-: �- OR ,<, 7 III.- 21 Ull I- - 1. -, , =, 2w 1 �� =< 0 Lo fr - � z - - =, Cc, a- " L,u U7) -Z: ,= < ,�o -�, - - S z z �,:::) u < a: 9 �j�: Z: 66 0, - lul I �� Ll L p: Q 1, 3< < LD 0 z ;� 0 0 7 , - , I w < : . ,�_ . ,w , , = > " � E �, � z .- ::: �2 2 (<) a. UJ L.0 L -U 1, (0, m U, , � - w Lu E ae < ,- - LU -- :2 w ,11 0� In � � , Z - - 3,� 2WE >, <. ,<, -< .0 0- 0. C, Lu 5 (l) a: o U>, Z< LZU, ul� �0- < 7 . � -= >1 ,w � � C, w . " �f < , ' 0 ' "� >' Lu -- 0 < Z Lu 0 <C I 0 - 7 :::) U) C), Z) 0 0 . Z, C) 0 . i-, , 2 (D Z O Q� w 6 � 2 - - �: 3: Lu F, < < Z < W ... D 0� Z< > 0- z < L' < < z 0 Z :� I �� < :D? F � 0 U = 0 < U, � . �, ,-, o w -, -. - - - - V� � a- Lu < w 0 I = I-- 0 ,) � � ,<� ,L-lu Z< � Z< -, o:,:: '. Lt ,.:: , Lu Z: LU D , � w Lu 3: w 'K < 2 < �) - -< Q, M� 0, -, � -Z L,,j ,. - �,, U., U, m W Lu z ) � . . , LU zo z U) , w Lj . 0 ,-, a- 'O 0 � Z) ,e O < �< L�L ,o <. 0 Z: = ' < ' ' LU 2 = cl 2 2 0 d , -, Z, d 0 � w - :: I z U3 oe L'i ,L,u -, N Lu (D Lu 0 = 0 w = T LU w Z) ?: z � w - . 0 OZ - 0 of I F-� 0> �,- !� L,U P �� - b LU � 2 jj z < [-- � C) �; z > z E iE < 0 w z < w oa� 10) g -Z. � >. .D� 0 w uj z < E5 M w L �; < 0 �o < L,u LT 11 :� T u 2 ,O ,= <, :,E U3 uj E OE E I-- Eos l< 10- . , ,z w - D oc', O ,03 < " ,< Lu Lu D Z a- 3: X CO F z z Lu � o w w a 1) I ' ' -- (0) R ,<, O', <, ,=n 0 L'u, W, 0 �: ", ,<, � :� z Z< E 0 L, F,, �- �E - - [-- < , 0 Z :�! ,O,J� w = 0 < z z ' z j' w 2� 0, � �' < 2E (D 1 -- w Lw, -- 2 �- � , L'! m ,-, >- . � S2 � 8, - - (n O �: � w w " � 0 -Z: " U,) oz z 11 0 :) =- LU LU Lu � � -,� E5 � Z) F- Lu Q -< � =- Ll 2 - .1 .<� (cl) I I ! � � 'O =1 ,� �n 0 Z Zj 2 Lu 0 -- Z) 0 Z . > 'L Lu o LL a- z 2 z � Z, z , ,< tr �; ,�n Ix a - ,0,� ,< g , g , < , ,,� , = ,) - 0 co 8 �W- �: LU co ", 02� 0 ,� z � .< , e [ < ,-- <, < co cl IL :1 cc zo: Q Lmu < 10 Z� t P� Lou Lou� 0 >z � Lu LLuu �� k- z z c = w . < 0 , < . 5 o w M z Z) Lu < � L. W, 0, ,< -, -0> � 2, Lo, z< U5 z ,o �, , ,- , w < 2! w , �, ,- 0 < < , � �- - < 'o EE 1 < 0, U>) w . -�j I-- z - C) ,LU .Uo � - - = tl,=) (I - 1. lw -2 -u -Z Ly 0 2 [< co :1 0 ui L3U LU - 0 0 0 =� 2 LU LL w 0 w < [- 0 G� (n 0� of [a )� co w -- f� m 0 u ,LU Z�) - I-- L. zo ,< LU w - �-, oll Lwu � -� w � OZ .w ID li - lw W_ � �<: �� L, w � � w 0 I-- � = �: < < � 1 �� , 0 " � , z < � < . > K > 3: � -- 0 Z EE = = - , 0 2 t) oa 0 T C, �-1. = - lot I! 01 E - < E,2 S, Lz- -, L !s .-- ,=, , 2 � �� [-- M 0 ,-, c u L 0, m T 2 (0) Pu ,- . W, o �- 2 O'L .Lu L.) 0,� 0�, ,<:, �� wo W, s,� -, -< LU W, L�U, U=) � on S2 " LLU) , cc) W, ,O) ,3-: tz L�m 02i ,- , =< .I < < �: =, < Z, -� R) =, � E -- 0 -- < S w- , U. � w 0 ,z L'. W. W� 0 " < 'r 10 - LU Lu 0 I ZZ, =< It � L-�, ge w = (O 00 3: 7: !,E L,u (2,E cw) - ::, , " Q,� �- z < W� 0 2 1= , 00 0 < � 0 CO =� [-- 0 = m " t, w w - - !s .= - Lu m of � LL � �- (� �: z � � Lx �- ,2 � < <. , Es D < ' "- 5 0 Lu 0 0) � (1) ,:r� co , w LU L) LE, - g , ". 8 R J-) -'. 1-�= :6; 2-i <z ,= LCU, 3 o o< ,= ,r - ,-- � . � Lt z w U) L -L, -Z .. 2. I LL, Lu , 0 (-) of 0 0) � z LL, " , -, I-- L < co < � � � ::) < =� 0 - 0 1.) " 5 2- ,-- - - -��,, .- � , z Lou T, iL,u Lu � -< " ,z F-: 0, Z) ,Z) LU - � > z , , , L) ,) (<) - z �- L 0 (D L=U Zi of 0 -- -- 11 LL, ,w - oz Z. i=: �.z - I ; LOL 2 E LI) G� U,5 �] z< (an oz P U) Lu - �< 0. 0 O', LL 8 L�� z -. '. -LL, ,= = I Lu LLLU, 2. z 0� - 0 , z -, LL, E U5 z F-- I a- , co - U) 0 oz ,O) o . -u < L,L, co L.L, -a� ,w, 0, - z u Lu 5 `� ") z = - z w ") LU E Fo, 3: - F-- G� 0 z >< -) Lu < LD - w - ,= O '-'f Z U) >- 0 - w '-- u)) � �- = 1z, LL, LL, z L�U- "I F= 2 - - -- O G� Z W 0 , . , Z Lu w o L) ;� ,-L ?: of 2 z �- �� F-- , , 'T 0 < 0: - OZ 0 z - < ( w ,,- - ,o . CL 0 L,Ll < < L�Ll � I - z z ,6 C) .1 T5 R �- , ,,,� 2") I 00 2 ,< L:) ,-,) LL, U<) Z I o -:� a� o "' (D 0 , z 0 1 zo CZ1) ,-, >: .< L -L, (Z' , L. E5 w (-) � = �: 0 Z ., -, LTU - - '. I -- , LMU z LL) L <z > � , a� z - ,,:: L<L, L<L, - L<L, D - .:, 0 -L, 0�, 0. 2, W. ,�,o Z, .. <, L,U ow L<L, fl� T= � ,� � �- IZO IL =0 = z I 22 ,O -LZ) U,) ,<, , 0 0 Z< , z co , R i, , -. �; ,,- � 2> L - 0- =� 2< . .) :� LL G� � LU C) � wo ,--. �w L.L, S<2 50 , P: � ,Z, �i Z, <w Z '. 0 - < 0, L - LL w , �- L,u 0 0 , �E , '. w "o <� I =0 u 5; 5 � ::) < >< >, 2- -, 2 L c) 'r , , . , � :E� -W o T :�� 5 � LL, < ,u - ,= - u 0 = = " . = z � -- � 0 ,,- 0 1 3: - - Lu 2 , ,) � :� =,,- - o (L (n < , LL L) L Ld 0 -- , ,. , 2, 2 ,,� z lz w w �, f1f , � , � 0 Z Z � LU [L IL Lu < E =1 �e ,o I-- 7LLIJ D- >, ,LIU) <, z ,=,f, a. U!, =, a- ,CZ-)- :(�L z Q, �.e 0, -L, Lu �-: CL 0 , a- 0 Lu LU F-- F-- LU �� LU . - - - < L,L, -Z�, iR - , - -= ,,,, o . w "), , ,-) Em ,- , <2 ,L,) w - �- P- C9 3: LU z ::) C) L,Ll L.0 [ - ,) L) -- C) z ,) - z C) 01 ,Z< - L,L �E L<) 3: I 0 Z , C w E < =� < Z 2 Z LU LL, ::) _ 0 LL, >1 LLI :� D� L; . 0 z -Z -, zo ,o 0- -, g -, �z .= -0 ,) , , ) �, > 0 " , . . - Lu LL, z 7 - LL, � L. - - = LL a: ,-, F< � - I . . . z .- . > C) '. ", , I-- z z - �0- 0 F-: Z) ;� w< Louj ,o z � 9 - � ,., L �i z l,-) l,-) "- L,L, ,LU 0, o I ) = , (-) 0 , = o , (o 5 �.-, LL, L. " <. W. ,. �� , < ::) � E (0) 0,� ,Z, . ,< ,- " '=') '.') �- -Z �, LZL, P: LL, 2 C) U05 z 1 . Z� C) -- oce) ll-, LOU � E , z C) - 0 it Lu ,-- 3� 1<1f <z - < , C,) - 5 z (D � D - LL, " > ,L U) (.) < C� (D W D ,, , =< 0 0 2t M 0 Z 00� - �j LLj = 0 � W -- Z ' ' ' ' - W C) - ,z L�u z - - ILIL , C� =, 0, I LU , ,, Lou� �< �-, Z. .0 ,) , Lcu 9, ,- P,: LCU) L -L, 80 ILL - :� �:: o < Lu � E5 � � . 0 u . 0 � 1, ,=q � L . < = 23 w . - , -, � < �- D IL , = �� i2 3� -� i � , �� . �, < > 2 < � � � Lu = co w -- 'L IL 'O U) ,-- OE 0. =< Z, =< � z L,u 1) C) , z , z 0 S2 Lc 1) -< �, <= �- OR ,< - I w - L 2 2, C) LZ 2 ,) Z . = 0 D LL Z, �L,u 0 - LU < (n Z �C,) - L. � z I 0 , 0- z �- z< z< co , o L IL, �- E 9 LU 0>0 0 ,= 0 Ct) L,U LU LU �; u) L) Z w < " LL, z - P: , z L,L, � 0 cn " = o- Lu -, <z 3i L.0 2,� zo - >.< � z . -5 -. W, .- iLLL L) I ?: " �,, af - - �= = L) < -, -, �- ,z � -- i- , , I - � t ' L-' < - :, , .L,l =< 2 �2 (1) < EL L) � co LU �o (ZD �< OL� U) C� U) = LU C) P- LU F 0 Lj =W t oz, :,�i lz ., . �z Z- .- 55 - - of � , 0 , 11 ,o : � 0 �- w ,W l< L-� [< �6 3: C) 2 3: , cao� I cap� <- � 6 �� co W- UT [-- �- - C) 0 L,L, L) Z � cy � < . , � L, , ::) z ,) . L LL, 0 u 0 � ou on L) < = < [-- a- z � = � w � - � M LU Ct) < c CS ui Lu z � ,<� c� Lu '- -, -� z �� < w . u -f, 2� W, 'z E 7,� L,' 'In � - - w- � �- :� -. !z 55 =-� z e:,:) L -U -,N) L 0. =. D z 0 F-- 0 100 P UZI 02 S2 ae LD < co < < Z. F= O', O. ,� w 0. R o w - ?: -� oul, �,- z - wo z ,6 W, �- 7 L=u -� LU < ui 2 � z z 0 < LU 0 IL ON of w < Fz < �: 3: �: ,� , E5 a- - 2, ,z C) g I -u > :�j = �,j =<: =0 - I [= L = =<: ) = � -- 0 Lu =) � 01-j ,�o U=) ui ,- L� 2 F-- U, < ,< FD 0 C, 0 0 0 �- 0 M a- 3: z [-- 0 < LU 0 � �=: � (n z SQ D C -n L') co z 0 , 11 co 0 � 0 L > 0 1! C, C) LU 0 w C) u < 0 , Lou Cc) = �- 2 I-- 0 z 1,1� U) - L -- 0 0 rl� a- of < of af of ::) 0� co 2 -) < z �- u ,-- 7: ,11, Z, Ey 1w, - LL, o - Lu , o , LL, ( =: 5 02 L 0 0 , - , , uw) �=- Z C) ly z Lz,j = Z C) a z 'O 0 �� 2 0 P: Z U) F -m = < Lu 0 8- = � < z F-- fr =: LU 0 P: (-) � (.) 0 , 0 EE LU � 0 , 0 :�� Z - 'n LU 0 o F-- o Q� [-- C) 0 LU , z L) � C) 0 C� � 0 9 F-: (1) 0 X 0 �- � Q� z < < > < LLJ Z a �- o U) Lu F-- F-- 0 F-- W F-- F-- F-- =� .i Cc) [-- ., I LL, O P: . Lu . - Lu = = LL < U) I 0 : 3: . . 3: = LL LL, ,LL), L,L, E ::) - z - '. �, - cz , .::) w , - 7 . I] U) . - . 0 < [-- , o w - 1) 1 - z .< �- w C,) -- 'I C., oll� L3U� ,l-, . - i lff�, af C/) F-- w LLJ , ,,e � [If C) :5 (if �- uj >- z >- . . O EE LL' F- L) L) �� -Z �-� < = < = U) 0 K fr af 9 'IT 0 < i:: �- 0 M (D )- < 0 0 0 LU = � 0 Z [L 0 3: LL CD , O� 0 < < < , I z � ul Fz , � > ED - 0 , 0 � 0 < Lu ,-- m < < � 0 U) 0 LL, Lu P < CL O- z > 0 , 3: 0 0� 0 z 9 - 0 �- LD �: z Z �- U) LU () < , [-- d -- �5 U) (.) LU 0 0 0 D < , - < a: m Lu � 0- = F-- � LLJ C,) ZE z LL, Z: IL � < �� O Lj F � Z C) LLJ < < V) < LU 0 LU LLJ 0_ CL LU < 0 0 LU LU z �- LU 0 O < z < rK LLJ Lu � d �< , m < < 2 X = 0 7E z � if: O 0 0� T Of 0 Of �- y = � � * § co w , > zi of �- () cr� Lu � Q� 0 i - o 8 E, � L=u , Lu - 'D . ::, �: , LU , LU [ Q� af Q� -- w Lu , , = - o -� Lu � -- �� , , - o - , Lu , - Es , � U) ll� - 0� < Lu F-- [L :::, LLJ L, � 9 > F-- �� Lu , C) r ) z z 7 o = 0 CD 0 � � < -- 2 V) -, .-: M, -Z Z- -Z � 2-�: 20�: -< , � - 5 - - LL, ir o V) LU - < - - - L 0 T:: Z: � F . ,,- .- , I , 2 -) LL �� = k �- (-) 0 < :::) z � , z = z LU 0 j z = 0 = >- � cy Z: , = 0 Lu 3: - LU 7 z 0- 0 < - z m o ( , 0 � 00 Z) � < 0 0� 00 0 � 0 0 T m � 0 IL �: D < � F < > < C) < M < � C) 0- 0 C) - 2 L o � P � < 0 -- U) < C) [-- 2 < C) < 0 C) F-- < ::) C) [-- � (1) 0 < 0 C) F-- < < LLJ U 0 6 �, C� li 14 1� 1.6 r-� Cd ai C; 16 4 Lri ll� ,-� .6 6 - - - - - - - - - � C� < F z ; 2 U) 0 =� LLf a: �: P -- d LU z F-- � , () 0 z :) z LU 2 F- � 2 L: LZ < �! LLJ z [if z 0 � :1 LL, - = I Lu z -- =, C) F 71 z =� co < O� > < iL D < LU LU - z z � I 'n LU T= U ,6 Y) > :) � z 2E , ZE D� - C) - C) -� < �: (.) , Lu 9 co Q� 2: 0 < � < 9� = , m LLJ L: w -6 7 < 0 V) z - Z, Lu Lu U, , � < �- < � 5 Z, o- " ZE =� . � � LU LLI Z LU IL F-- 7 < (1) w 0� < a LU 0 0 Z: < � 2 0� - K a M=! U) C) < � =� � � �- 0 (.) :) , , �- T LL, of � >< 0 ! 5 � = M � - orf 0 W LLJ Lu � < � z � z U) �- < M: _ a Lu � Lu Lu 0 < - < - < co -ce -� 06 < 2 12 3: 3: 0- Z a LU [-- (3 U) 'I) F-- O- 0 � CL U cl� < ::) O- LU t (n �, C� 1� 4 li 16 rl� �6 0; (D , z LU � . �- w K Z, L,L, LL, LU LU LU z , (D (D (D �e � 0� 0� 1: z LLJ 9 �- LCL)l LU w z ,6 (,) - Lu 9 0 Z) , - - - - ' 0 G� � 0 � , z Lu , " < to ��6 LL, (L'u) I " t - = > z 2� - z � �-: . �, 2 L,L' ,L,L' z , ID 6�: ' Z � 2 2� 0 � z F-- � ` LU 3 0 E (6 z 9 0 m < Q ', LL, � 2-� � Lu 2 m Z" 2 � >: F 0 O 5 Z, " . . z . Ru� < w = o w -. 0 -Z �5 = -. 0 LU � 0 3: F-- LL, OZ ,<, < cp K L,u C, :� = LU LL L/) w 2 (60- z lco � = 1: � 0 =) 1: 2 I(-- W E3 ,W) x LU , F-- T, �o ::2:) z - cw K , LL, -. O- , -. a 0 �- - OR �- L.L, z (D 6) 3 10 Lo -) L) OM - LU rr " � ,) q c) z LU 3: - F-- > (D . L _ LU �� LL, �= >- 0 0- 0 �- Z � 2 z IL D �: p � Lu C� oe < -- .0 5.) ,- (., ,. ,OL Oz -� >0 ,0, R, CL,L,, -, L -� ,o o = o -, �- Z< -W LOL ,-, s .0 <- E5 =, ww (<) I., =-� - - �2 �- 0 L LL, :2 L z O � �- 0 2 - ) �- -, OR L = LL - w - =� > L 0- < LU 0 01 ,. - , L,L, d ,<, �� " C'n o- OL/-) i<E ,- c3 �- . � < (-) ") 0. ,o �W-- -Z 2 - LU U) 1-0 ,W) QD LL, 9 2 8 ,6 , , LL, <- z Q- ,- R C, af L ,2D:: E LU - of � z �� <T U5 L:LEJ z z =< L, LU :: < 0 0 Z ") IL < 0 w 11 - - LL, >- 0� L�Ll �- D- 3: F, (0) -,.f ,<, :0-� 0, � -Z< �] (<) 02 � 0 , � L I 0 L I-- 0 ') a_ ol� -Z, L,u (Z) lz (ZD ID � ll = z 2 7 I - ,- ,E z< -> -, -7 Z z o 0 z 2 Lu 2 - F, Er - - ( (-) �-: w (,U) 10 j-, 0, ZO �- - t " , z 0 0 < �: "L <, ,., �LL,, ,- .. L=L, . �, �L,u y - F: 0 � I W. C z w - 0 . L) -) o U) E C) >< 2� P C) = C) 0 -- <. 2, k . 0 0 cl) -u q 'n Z- .- E c) ao 2 = P , < Lu co O C) , LL, �, >, L=U � ,6 L-uf ,z Zo I ,,D) L 02 L.L, uj L(U, L,L, L�Ll ,z (80 I 0 3: ow = )- z ", - - -Z� � M� :L,U:: a - �, P: zo L -u UZ) 1z, � Z02 Z, ,< (-, (,-- ,-�, L -IL, -, - .. � ,,,a I-- ,< C0 z -) < u " 7: 0 oz ,,, � '. oz z - - Cc) 2 ,(,,�) <- .- ,,, ,. 7 < I " z , 2 I ,2 P: L) 10, 00 q �� : l< =, , 3 -( 9 U) - 0. �- �; -. ZO) � P � -1 < < � , � , z ,< �: -, L,L, U5 .:) M, oz) EL Lu � Lzu , < . Lu � . 3: 9 ,<,) = 0- LU E: z 0 LL - y m � - - , Of < - , (.) LL, ,<, I :E o 0 Z, 3 � -< z �, LU LL, w of L , F z S2 2 o .z . I-- 0 . �� g S(, 02 " :E L -U ,E = ,) , 2 �,! 0 * () , 0 - - 3: � , 2 ,� po I �> ,<, Q, - 3 � 5� Z< � cz), � O- zo -, ,�, oz 1-= k L,u Z< ,<, -, " 0:� - on , , z < U) E �; of z W, ,< -0 - -. . = < L>U C, L,Lj 9 rr P- E < aof T O, " Z<s (D oz 0 N . z Z) � z Lu 0 < LU G� I LU , 0 Z,) 0 0 2 z 0 Z< < 2 =-� U.) 'o , z 5 L) z , . - 9 Z-, � . =, 5 z < 0 ) 0 U), 0 LU U3 ,L,Ll LL - 3: E5 O Z Lu z D 0 F-- 0 �2:: C6 L=L' ,Lu O'L FLL 2 0 >- -) �; " LL z - ,) 9 0 -- E LU Lu 2 z � � z � [)- o z . Lu z z - ,> F-- ", � z � . < LL, , -Z " 8 ,- -, 9 -, " = � < LU ,, 0 L , , - , --' _ , U0 Ro w (-) , - " 2 0 Lu � 4� .< li 5: LL .-J (w " o .) , , � " ,z z . = 0 P: = 2 , �- ,� < s z o LZ w g L2LF, zw T= z , 0 0 F- Lu �: L) �: Lu ,�( - F-- 0 � - Z, 0� < " > w LL - - - , z K z > - = T< LL, 0 5 " �- oz ji'j Lij 0, zo FO LL, ,= M (n I =� L) L) 2 z z LL, I- L,Lj ,2 :F( "f E < ':):) P oz U) oz ,WD li o LU , , , 11 < 2<i 1) 3� LU , ,L 2 < z , (" '. 2� <w Ez w 0 0 0 LU 7 � OZ 2 LU � , � , Tw= �,) 0 C�o w 0 P: ,< (D U) U) m 0 �- ,,� �- ,x z 0 , z 1) z � LU < LLUU L,L, Z, < 7: U) = � < � - ,,,� po "L aof 2 f 2o �2 0 z 1. -, wo L,L)l Lu LL, zo � li 0, zo 1: 0 ± 2 ILL, 0, d 0, 0> L>L, 2w E ,w (0) ,O LZL, V,5 g 0 , , , < ui - = , z Z, >M- z < =. �5 U,) 0 < 9: � (D 0 Of z (-) =0 0 " >: � C) a- 0 >- Of 0 z co = U) < Z Lu C) Q Z] 0 L>Ll LIL, CD > a,f �- .< :L�u � -) , 0 - ::) C,) CZ E � co � I , -1 w < �� ,> L) . :::, a� z LLJ Z z - , 8 <� LOL-1 w z 0 > E2 �- P I= w p- F-- Z 0- ILL . -LOLI, -, ,o w 2. 02i L,L, O, L>L, >m 0� =, ,z L :� 1w, FE 0 , g 0 O ,l) z Z, c) F>' 0 FW Lu 0 0 w< F-: 2� (D Z 8 Cc) 0 < 0 (if 0 0 �- G� �� ,,-, 0<� � co 0 jo- , z =) co z < �- 'n .::) S2 '.� '.' c.') L 0 LU LU , < ,-- 0 2 0 WL) - z 2.i 0� Z< 3: � T L>L<, Z, � - C) > w G� - - - W W, <> .Cfl OZ LTU 0 - LL, , ::) u P: ty � - z C) ,- 3: Z- ,. ,L,L, Lu -, , , . , �E -W - -< LL, Lu " T - �, - -, Lu �, 2- �� 'pt � = 2 CC) 1, "", W, �E 0, L�u LT < zo 2 1 LL, L(L), CD, C-) 2 , a LU F O < Lu n LU C) " 2� �� L,L,' ,- , o > Ir < (6 cn cn = 2i LU = 0 '-- )- C) 7: 5 2 �,� 2 � ,-- d g -- < af 0 LZ .w oz - - LL, I , <, � 0 z �22 ,) L.L, o o , I. . ,<o <. ,L,L, - z< L,� �� L� Z,) co U) : B , -= � -- > m ,7,� C.) �- .- cz) -Z Z. 3: m - �- � W LL CL < - z in F -- u LL, , - , - it , <, G� Q,� , ,-- o I I - LL, 1) ,O z - 0 C) -- L L - � < 3: ,-- Q Of (O I LL, FT (If - Z I-- 1) 0 0- I a- - z 0 -) <) z L) LL L) L L � = LU L- LL�, < LU � P: ,,,o L.0 t �< .0 ,� :-:, .< > .- ,WL z = = 0 'o . .- OR = E Z,, �- -, i .0 , -Z = - w w G� LU u 0 � n w F-- 0� - 2 L 0 . w - , C) , w < Z U) z LU ,)f cn , U� 'z' L, 9:, z ::) 1 � -- ) UU) w - L,) ,� �- � W. P,: ., 2 . � 0 U) I �- (D Lu = = Z 0 z " " t . < - '-- - - - W LU z 0 w z w - �L<L, 0, 0 , , , , , z = -� - z - L) , , < a- F < Q g T ") C, 3 LU , OW z G� � < ID � ::) - � � ' - 0 - �- 2 5� . .0 Q, = Lu z E 0 - L- Lu z 0� E z < z zi (=,, :) L) 11 :� L�u �R - 11L Lcue LIU, Lu - 0� 0 C6 �- >- �- �- -, L -L 0 W, y < cn Z) 0 �- F-- z < 3: 1 F-- < , 3: ,wo -� s ,< Lou oz ,2 > 0 m Of F < �H! U) < � ow �-� il I � 0 o LL >- �- < af < L) F, - 0 1 � .1, � < , , � 0 ) LL, Lu 2� M, y 0 - w - - z 0. 6 o I., - < LL, < .L::), lo 0 - ,-- )<� 9 �E - � =< t .LL, "') z,, 0, z � , z C. , . :,:: i I , 3: Z Cz) cl � ID ' - E L28 -0 -Z, 3. 2, ll� ,a 0 IL !.= ,. L.L, zo ,,,� -= z LD ' - 0 z < co w �- �U) z LL, LLJ 0 1 � z z LL z , Z< - � ,un) ,- - oo� oz WD - 6,� L.Ll '. 'I) E ,Lu - 0, ir LL 0, ,.) � 92 <, <z L�L, 8 U-) - - -, 2 'O ,- -, � Lco, 3: LU w L) :) z �- cf) Lu < 0 2 �E �- � LL, �e Z, o u) LL, z LL, � E Lu � 0 , � 0 _ L:: :, D , � ,0,� �: �- ,�,�) ,.,- 5,: :2:) -�:,) :LEL, C) Lu M LLJ 2 = iE : 1) a- LL, � w z - , , LL, 0 z 5: 2 - 0 � , - 7 < ,,,o ,>, ,M) E, >. ,02 �, ,� 0 -- I-- 0 ::, W 7] , = 0 ,j LL L CO �- U� , , , 'i G, Y >, U) LCU, 0 lo W, 3: ,I-- ->i Z , D Z) 1: 0 LU , .f w - �, � R ,-) �, L LL, - o - , :, � � = z � 7) R - V) �, �- � . , Z I . < �: <- .= � ,-,� E .. ") :2:, < . E >- 0 ::) �,:, oc:�) E U) 5 ,F LU E < 0 rK < Z 1) < Z IU 11 :,:)) ,, ID LLI E 0 - � W Q� 1) Z < = -0 I LU < z z - lz l< " 0. - � 0 n L " , , 0� � ( M M , f� L ' LCU) 0 m oe 0- < 0 > O < 0 Lu Z O ,) = " 0 LLEI: LL, I < 10, L,L, � �< W- ") LU -,� < (.) LU Z �, -- E ZOE -- 16 � , LL. - I ,) 0 E , . Lu X FD � <. >w - <, E. , �, '), . -0 g: . -� E) L -u 7< � .< lz f, �- >w ., I ,=,, 0 LL, " 'L , ,,,, 3: LL, �: ,0, - " '.) F: ?: ,o ,< z c z z 0 . c� L -u d � -W L a � , . w . < 3: z , , 2 E z � LZUE 2, zo , U5 Z, t :12L <, ,O) I -, Q u , , 2 d < " o z [L g " 0 z , = D� = g� . 0 - ,) ,-- LU - , >0 OZ i16 (n L�L, 'o 2 Q� 7 "' � �, = 2 oz L.0 i 2 6 Z.: � L2Y 0<� I ow Z, C. L,L,, - Z< <� I<- j L) 07 ",L o ,W� L'. -, " - " :Z,:: 9: ": gL,ui <W= Z<, (oz I =� Of - � -, '60 - 5 LL, ,,e " z z , g , , Lu (W - 8 z 0 ,- , LU 0 � - L 29 11)) P �w - z M, ,�5 � 0, ) LL, U., �: >� oz ,O) �, ") - , �: o< L LU L., lz I- 3: < - LL, �� - > zi C) . wo , , , < 5 oz . 0 1, Z 1,) L�U . ' E 0- U) � - W O ,w 0 M 10 �,::) LL' < < M 0 Z LU < C,' Ir CE, c < ,z >: ,:,:) 0 - I f,:) 2 Z< �, z �� ol () 2 L, , 11 P , 2� , , . . > <, U-) (.1 - �- ,. o> ,< 1,1� <, C) ?: >- LU Er E . ,- ,,- oz -Z 1.) Lu, oz <z m - (g) - �, EE E .- w LU < =,� 0- " z - I , z t , 2 'o L, - = ,� LL, " LWL, � R- Z, T 5 o 3: LL, , LL, , , Z , , , , , a< - 0 LL, U 0 - , F, �: < - , , <, L -L co z - Z -- � z , ::, Z< �, �, ] , 1z, oo� ','f E< W= F "') D- (0,) Z.- :,:) 2, co LU 0 z 1, �< 0�, ow Z, Ly Q,� (LL), 0 0� , pz LL, -- �,::) 2 >� 1� � (D 2 0 E , o Z > Z - � g Z< -W >- � � Q> t, ow� lcl�, 2 L -U �-,E . S DO-) E - Z., L,u ,O) � � w 0 LU = Fz 0 U3 �- Z cl� w 0 13f LL, LL > �-, (<,) -Z E �: LLi -Z, � D � , E, (;-!): i < 'o - ,5 . E z , z u 0 . 0 CO =, ,� LU L'U 0 < aj LL � 29 �� (:::), ILIL�, 00 LU OF 0 , LU � E m 3: < 0� E z 2 L, -�: < z -- - - t z 0, >7 ,- , -)- z < 0 0 � ,< � - Lu ,6 L. , LL, �: ,. LU Z< ,Z) L>U - 2 < .-� �- (0) P) � �W�: - ,. 5 I 5� Lt U) , w 0 0 m 0 z w LU 3: 9 P: c ::) 0 ,) , = z 2. IL (.) 0 �� wo 0 �Lu <z - E F-- ::) 0- 0� - m 9 LU E� z � 0 0 F-- zo L.0 2 91 -� - 0, �- - L.0 - E, :,:) :�:) . 0 ,Z'), :-� 0. . C= ,O) u< t: - �i o �: <- 0 - I - 2 = :) � ,- :-::, -= ` z - " � < � . - ::) - < ,F, 3: C� () a- 0 L - w , -, .- ,- Lu oz � - �- co , , 2 < U) - , - �- ,z UZ) L2U LL, � 6� M, -, ,- - < , , .) X� LL, LLJ " Lu (-) - li �: �- -, - L -L, -. �- .. , p, ,-, (o - Lu u) >- ZW ,<:: �- �� Z.) , , . -) ]] LU a -, ,) " Z: 0 0) F-- 20! -Z �- LL �- �- L:) Lo QOE � � 2 , I � co I , z < F,) oe FLU P- ;i ,,3� � Z) < >- �: �L-L, L�L, cuo, �(7) � C� = Lo I � , � �, < C, U-) ,OL� -, L,U ao < m �- C, z ,-- w 0, 0, = -, . , ,-, - � �-, WO L'U Y ,Z) Lo , , , F-- � � 0 = = > 7 0 , � �- U0, (-) -::, , - L, . z co -, -, -. O', <> �, ow� �- < , x m C) 0 0) (1) 7] , < - I < ::) �: a-, �i SQ < ,=-) ,=) w LL, , �- Z) F ,-, L� U� =< 0, L -u "') (0) a. -, Tw ,m OZ 'D 0, �F , . - .0 U5 LQL�, ,O 5, >L<) � L9 - = < L -u o L- ,- =< U-) ,<) zo - -- �, " , . �j = .- 0 i2 -, -, z 0 <, ., - - - C) LL, of of U) 0 LU < Cl) L: Z -- 0, 0 C) Lu m �::) I Lu o 0� P Lu ae M, LLL), af :0, cw) a I 9 U) 9 -- a 0 a -- . L) Z W, z . co - � 8 0 �: Z) () 0 F-- W Lu U) z U, , R L ,f "f 0, z ) , LL, � 0 L - z 0� C) LU Z 1: F z LU if Z 0 , q ,< Z< D� oe (L 0 " ,< fr , 0 �E L 0 < < In , , o �, , :-,:: ,. LL, (w K, �-, , Z, - 0� < 0 C6 w � C) ; z 0 co L 5 , �: o 0 0 �- �- co o 0 < LLJ 0 ,- -. :i �: �: 3: < LL, P: LU LU 0 z Lu 0 0 h= < Lj C) LU , - a � C) �- Z (-) E E �- �� 2 = LU w L9 2 �- , < = 0 ,o < ;� C) - C6 LT o - o z o 0, �] ,w U5 LY 0 < Z 0 LL, U 'L , � I , �- Z uj E� ") z < C? 0 ::) c) (1) E x :] 0- ) LL, 1� = L�L, U) 7� UZ) o 2 < o , o , , � � li co Z U5 Z , �- < �- (D E C) Q� z z fr LU F-- Lu , 0 C6 0 < Q� U5 �- 3: L , , . , U) , - �- �- af = �- m I w LU w L (.D U) Z Lu M -- (') � �- - < 1: ::) , LL, oz , z ; - 0 ::) < < (.) 0 z L) () < CC-) (.) 0 O a I F-- = LU LL, D 0 �- 0 Z (.) IL 0 � P: (D D F-- LU y) 0 � L) E F 0 M Lu Lu F-- (2 o 0 (.) . - (.) 0 Lu (n (D 2 Lu (-) , (-) T:: c) ::) F-- > z C) 0 >- 0 LU U5 C) z U o 5 C) -) G� < LL, < C6 0 0 = z LL, 9 �: Z: -) -- o < < z z a- < I ,-- LL, � :� Z z /) n- T (.) D� 5 � ,q i:: g , - � z , o ( �i - z LLJ co U) C, � L 1� 2 K w a :i z Q� 2 2F oe 2E , , Q� o 0� � Q� 9 . " ,,, Lu < ,� 0� C) Q� � ( F - z w � 0 0 � o =� z o U) w Er Ir ; = Oaf - Lu - Q 2 z 0 - � 2 � 9 � =i - �r :�� 0 - - 1 , C) - 9 z , :5 ::) D - F-- : � >- LL, , i- � D LL, , 0- Z � - a LL, z q- - ::) � - Lu 0 = O �- P Q� �- U 0 �- � < �- < (n -, z a < - T C) z LL, G� CO 0 F: , , �� Lu Lu < " - U5 , Lu �- � co Lu co (D of �- uw) �,- LL, �: , , �- z E - V) U5 F , , G� c) < �: (D � F- 2 0 - � 0 = o �- < C) � , > , � z P: LL, U) �- o �- 0 CO D� 2 �- c - z LL, � jX � Z) (3 LU W z z -- m (n U) , LL, z 0 =! z EL 2 , -- z 2 z 2 >- 1: LL, a- � z Er z z = Z) z < F �- LU Z � � = 0 ::) 0 0 CL Lu 0 tz � >- x >- Z:) x D- D 0 Lu 0 Lu z �- 2 0 - 0 u () o � , z Q M L 0 < w Z) � < 0 - Lu < CL 0 E o o L) E L) 0 - U) z Z 0 0 E LL, I >- < It LL, Lu . C) �n 0 to u) ,0, �2 F [D� z 0 0 0 E z , of , . 0 � 5 � L 0 C3 0 0 0 -- (.) ::) Z, (� 0 o , ww z 0 < L) C) L) a_ < < < .) < 0 �- �- L) LU �- F- < :5 Lu < U) �- 0- z w L) L) �- 0 z Z) < L) Lu 0- < C) � - 0 0 C) o C) C) < 0 C) co < < U) fL (1) U) LU � Z L) L) < C) L) a_ < L) � U) L) < m Lu < < U) w Lu w ,6 rl� �6 5R L cs �, 1� li 4 Lr3 ,6 t= �- N N N Lul � C� ll� w I � 1� 1� 4 L6 �6 r-: �6 6 - - - - - - - (n -: C,� 1� 4 L6 �6 P�: V5 �, 1� 0 z - - LU � � . I - G� ll� � � 0 , , -: >- LT LIU z !,� >z �, . -. Lu c L, LU 0 OZ t LL, (<,) OZ, = Lu < z < >- , - L 0� z Z > LL �- T < Z � 0 �- � ,� 2 T 0 cl �, . . < - � �- - 7: L, = ,o 0 - Df . = .= -, G� 0. 0 � - 0 Lu - �� , , G� �2 z F-- z LL, 2� �0- lzl�l clu) < < , , I-- ,I 3: Lu 0 - �e ol L � E L'u, F-- w < , � LUU) ,O ,x " . . � LL, C) w c) L D LU - P: ,- <= - - - - � 0 d Z z ,j � Q - =) Lu co �,- , D o :� � 6� < O n of z 0 (L Cf) ZZ, t :� < (D - - 1� o - ,=, "o ,-- pom =, ,<, �� L=u () > �- -P ,- z LU :,) . C, 2. ,-o ,<, ,Z, ,= ,o " o = E5 �� ,j >z z () z t o -, (- Lt., OS � � ,U) =, - x -) " uj E z Lu -, 6 , Z� , 0- = � ) � 0 Lu LU 0- j L�-y �� < oz M,) :� � 3: < < -Z 0 Lu - 2) -CZ,) Lu 0 'd L�u < 3: ,z �� m a� z J = ,-- y 0 � oo� - C3 - c X 'n M z �F LU 3: co FLU zw zo t C<o Q� LU � 2 < 7 ,., U-) < 0� Q� �uj C) 30� -. .- .< -, Z, -< <, -, �� W, 0- - j , ) L LL, Lu . ,6 . . 0� , w o U- .0 - �� > z g L. Go, - <, ,:,:f) n ,Z, ci = TR . 1� , U�, �2 , =) F-- D o - L'. 1<1� 5, C.) -, ": 0 w . = Z) Lou Lu pof w p: N C) Of =, 0- P- <, � 0 U) < W2 10 ,-� F -- z z 0- - = z � W, 0 0 1 ol ow E P oz a� < LLU) 3� �� o Lu 0� L,U >- wz 2f Z , � . :� LU ,U) 0 C=o = E P E Lu > < , , z , = < P7 § = ,- = , < Z6 D, Cc) ?: 0 0 - , 0� 0 < LU , 4 2 2 - L -u L', oz zo Tu -�, 1, , ,O) , , � s� L, " =- A , 0 � C) �- zo) :C:)) 0 2 w z 0 L=U w ca LU 3: [<c Lu , ww zo (, - � = , � =� , .0 z 0, < K ZO < mw P 9 j Z 0 in �- F-- F-- z �U) a- � 0 �- P 'If = � z � U5 - z T C<) z C) " 0 , ,) < L) ,,- z F- 0 L) 0 � < �L F- z z ,) ::, F �z 0 i t , � " : : 0 ae (D LU - :) z � L) FW 'O Z �: :!� OZ �, 00 z E: 2 p� w K = � = z p < F= , z <= -< Z< �,, IS, Q ,o , 11 < < 9 O- P - z C) P: 0 L- < <: w Lu �w o T C) F -< 0. �- � =) P: Z) >- ,-- Tu L=u ,� S 0 7 z L) 0 W P: 0� I-- =, - gi z = "of -j Tu ,o Cc) � w < 0 z �- Lu � w Lu � CD = C) U) O cn 3: 0 0 cw� ?� 0- D , . w C) < !� < 0� 0, - Z, ,w )-, 3: �l �- ") z :-] 0 P z ,O < >- �; z ,� F-- �� E =, 0 W, ��z w ,) Lu ,,� � 0 � L: w Tu E 0, ,O �E 0 z L,u 1= , a,): - I , P: < , . 0 , � Lou Lz) F= I [if Z L) z < cn <, < z �� - , , �j 2 w z h� w - 0 0 ,L,u C) - a- < C) . 00 �- z < U,) = < se U) , -- 0 3: L - < - S>2< uj - " �2 -Z E U?,: ?: T -= 2 2 , ,� 0 - x , < o 'o z -- 9 z �- F- LL C) Q� U- " < , � C) < LU -- Z -- = - Lu - w L: <: , I 0 . - - . , , -< . C) - � 3 H5 , " EWE = 0 . x I .<::) w 7) < ,a z z LU 2: - s < - w �- cn z 0 o u< 0 0 F �� F WX F G� U) C/) co w Z 7) - ,zo 3: - = � C< > 0 � D- Z Z n- 0 0 Cc, w >< < 0 co , w = ,O ,:)) Cc, 0 :a:) Lau 01 Z, , 9 co �< 0 Ed ,) z " Q 0 , z Cl) ll� C) = (Z) lo� 0 �� 0 >- , C) , L,u o, L�u l< ,< ;� �5 0 Lu LL < , co 0<� 'i �-- Z: z w U) 0 = , , >- c,3 oF - L cn L , R CD LOU z �,> C) w of ,D) rle . �- �- < , , C.n ,2 z 5 z L D LD 2 [If < F-- � :) < - - -- 0 � , , 10 w , 'o bu , ") 0- (-, - . � 0 [ 0 < , o 0 � Lu < - , " , 1, 2 LU, ,� ,,-- U- oz 0 - (3- 2 z " ', (, ,- 5 z 0, o z w � L I - - -::l I - 0 0 -- - 0 10 L, LU I , Q - " z g I-- 3: LU 0 - -- F-- <1 - = , " z U) U L,U �- � C., < SO Z; a- - Lm C-) L,,u -Z, ��:: �L,u g z< L'. � u) � c') � - - T<: �-� L-, >- , -W �-, ,. 7- 0, L -u z F-- I Z� Lu L� >- - z z - a� w z 0<� w P� '- 0� 2 (Z, !-L . 0, ,-, < O, z (, .- - , LLU , w , � ) - -�, u 3� F <z U) 0- z o Cc) ul ,� w o 2 -Z �< z �, 00 z w z � - Z I I. - - z Lu LU 07 :2 , , pu ,�f 08, (" Y C, - �, co ,) ll� 0 6, - Ru 3: w < , , 11 Y� . .:, < Lu '67) o Lu O', ,-) � - W, L,-, ,-) .. C-,) �<, - U, t � - - - t K z - :::, Z, [if - D CW') < - - W. L I-- �: 1) 0 < t Z o �- o U) - 0 <z 0, E - ow� �, Zz I-- - " 2 1.) " � C7D .= L C2 0. �F 0 �' < oz Z 0 < g' �- Z > -, D () , ,� � , , , - (L 0 0 � c)f ,' 0 � 2� D 2! ,:,) z :<2 LCU) D � (-, >- ��, " C, ,= . Lc', Z, 3: , - - 20 0 E; , (5 �- =< , 5 . �o E U- F� M, zw) Lou (<O (D g> f:: z z LU FC-,-) z 2 a] < [L cf) < 0 , = L , Z, K L.0 w < ll� El 11 o < z o ,-- 0 . C.) a. < -�, UU) Z) < 1::S Lzu I ,o t5 C., �� - � 9 o - 0 w � Ir zi , , z A w S2 - - � - - , ,-L� <= z �: 2 =2 x , 0) fr < >, .<� < .w ,- ow ., - T = < LZU -W w 1� wz T, ( z 0 0 < 0 ?: < 0 - w - Lu LU a- Lu rK Cf) 0 Fo- < LU - I L-6 C, 0, ,= o :] T: � W, ,-- , � 0- . -0 LU K 0, C, 5 <. =, L. cl = cl U) - . �- =, E. �, g �� 0 0 2 !� C15 � u 0 uw) P- � = LL of ,z I-- = � > 0 - L Lu �- �: � �- 0 �: 0 - I-- W. ,�, ,o ,z, 1<1 C,l) �a.� t5 o z , 0. " D F- a� , 0 ,) 0- - =1 �=- 16 121: wo �W, ZO 0 0 z 7: a. of 13� D U�j C) � U) m Q < 0 �W- Lu LU w z = 0 w W< � s '. oz LTU ,w , z< 'Lu , �,::) ,) ,- z L.0 �- C, , z 'L :Z:) � ,:i 0, OR lz -UW) ILLS -, �-, W. L -u 2w L.0 .j w w � w 0 LZ , < a ,) , ", 0 0 �' 0 u) 2 ', uj - '�' , - 0 cn - �5 in < 5� ,� 0 L<) cc,o) I o=) g 0, L�u <w g C6 - t !i -< - <. 0, 0. ,-) a: (-) Z; o i ) , � , - 0 < 0 :::) � E d - w 5 ) < oz ,� ,o = , Z � 0 E C) �: = 0 < = , � F-- 0 �: LU u � ,, , � 5� > � , , WW ID 1�) - u z 2�: " W- . � Z) , � w - w L2U! W, . W, 0,2 F= 2 I-- w F-- - E 0 . � m < U- uj Lu - F-- O 0 :� w - w K (,, E " w -, w a, 0 2 I �- , z - � 9 6 � ui 7i U) z L L= [)f ca = � I 2 ' . 0, w z ,> 0,� , = z - , - Lou z >- o 0 0 " . < = o o . a: a - LU ;� 7 _ � w -u R .- 3: 0> . ,- W. -, 7w < , - L� � < < . C6 C) ILU 0 < LU LD LU , �, U Lu g: 0� L -u .- L a Q<� lco- F-- p C) E <z I § z I " ,-, ,,-, K < �-, 0) L - � - K ,o <= > < �: =, 0� - < " . < .: :�i ,� ,z -, oz wo ,-, O', - 2 , g Lu - - < z - - , CO z >- C) Z 0 < CD UJ :E , 0 0 W E Z, - W� Q :� <. W, , !� Lu - z 2 0 = L'. P, E z LCU) �� 1<1 - . (O 0,� 0,� ,I, L>U 0, -, IL 2 :E 0 W, Lj tr u " , 0,�j :-:) 0 �,-) , , E § o - w - L . Z-) �, C, . . o � < , � -- g . < LU 'L C) < - LU ( - 0 , 0 - 3: . zo) a' O- m m :� uw z - < > - U) m Z LU (6 C) . (o u � . -Z <- 9= C.) C") 0, 2 0, W, 30: ,-, =0 F , , uj >- C� =- W- ,- . -< . 0, ", z -= ,2L U) w = X,: Co < Lu w � - :� �: = , :1 o E H , ,- � z 0 z m Lou < 0 ZD co -, a C-) :-i c- 0 f, F-- :] b� 0 - 0 � < 0 L: CO ,Z 0 [If - - - -. 2� 7 I 0 U) 0 'o .0 i.::) § >, , � - 0 < LU - z: - - - � <z - L'i � .. �- , (<, -, z LWU of :� D 0 3 LU ,O 10, <, - (if L,U z -,, C-) 0, 0 = - < < -, 0 L -L, w , � ,= ,- ,< ,< :-:) .- �; -, z � -, LL, -, ,=, - I 0 1 0 - I I Z - N ' ' 0 _1 0 ;� ,, , < L) �i :<F LL, = o 'o I -< ,l) Z, ,w (1) w ,� - , z ,,- " 11 �- 2 g cz U) - - - Lu �, P 1) , , - � op� (.9 >. 0 �� 0 0= � ", � S,2 � = c 0 ,-, �? I = z Lu , -) Y � 0- < � < 0- ,] w I , . , �� . � (U', _ Z = < _ , , Z LL, C) > LU � , L: �- LL�j U) < W =j , ,,_ LU � . , , � < < � , < z - C. ,: �? , ED LL, :i " ,. - IL ,�) 0 z ( = of � , - -Z - , 0, >. < z � , , ,) m > p CZI) M 9 �- LU F- ,�) �: .L<) 0 C) LU LU 0 -. 0- Z<) 1.1� I LL, W2 - w < Fz- 1�0 Z< OZ � < . Z 2 b 0 - �: 0 Z) I 0 D F-- F-- Lij o ow ,-; 9 - z LL w U5 ,-- W. - - - - Lu U.) �- ,o (8) I -L .< D >- - w . (. z § =: 10 " .,, o '. C) >, -Z < i r ,o -� Lmu "LL p L,u 2< ,- ,0, ,o ,z-- U) < o ,<) 0. =. ,0, zo 0, (D � a� 0 , < z 1� � , Lu , Lu < o -� Fn 20 I-- 'L z , Q� D � C, Q 0 . - u , 0 F �: ,E-) W, oz - wo .< 15 ,20! ,() (<) w �] Q,� R� = - Q� <z o T5 U3 c � z o E3 c) < > < �,- o z � " 0 0 L� z P: " (D ,0, �0, 2 ,LL), :�:) -Lu LU) �: �2 T LU ,w - ,� :(�) (<,) oz 0, � �-� zo ,-, ,w,, E W> �- � C., �, (,) ,o 18) �-L F q F- C) z , co, Lwu o LU < z Lu . s! 0 - "- Lu E z z Lu (,) () 9 LU T: 8 0- 0 0- OCL Z,) Fz- 0� 'D (n S z 2 - - 0 0 Lu C) -- 2 �- Lu Lu 0 F- 2 G� �- Z< = , " , - F-- ZO (-) ,<) W= "O oz - LU CD 2 w -: o< 5 = LL -- o i z Lu < t z < , , � () z � 5� -Z ,3): 7"I - - '. - , z � ,w , ,r , LL, 0 ,� � 0 Lu F- � Lu L) 2 z � " Lu - �: z = z z LL, § F - T = �z =: , LL, � 5 z T m LL, < 0- �,- z 5 �=-: < z - O L� ,2 . ,� R, () 0 . . - -W R 0 -< ( , LL, C,L �- L=L, F-- Z, Lz 'o LL, 0< LU -, <= n ILU) 3: < �; ,I, E z �� LL, c< - -) g F<- (P) ca 2 U) � f z �Lu LU �e F- 2 . '! - - - F-- LU U) �- I-- 2 ") a� 9 ,,� 0. - - : = -Z -0 ,o =-: 2- (o -, � �- E =, Lz -, �L - ,<, ) - ,-, > LL, '. - �< -� �,- Z,) �t , c) - = Z) z = Z) � 0 z a- = < EL . w . � , < ) E , -, ,.,) '. 00 I :91 (,) 'o . U5 :, , LU - �] 1, �5 ,- - ,: 0, ,,� 0 Q t , LL, o < o OD co Z<) UZ) , 02 o < �- 11) - z P a- Cf) P: 2 2 m a: �- I 0 z CZ0 co L,U I 0 .) g , �t � z , z . , , = < �� 2 , co S of �0::) = ,LLj Z) ,o � 22: �e �- Cc) �,- l< Lu oz) �.- ,O) (�) , 1= L) LL, ,L�ul ::� , UM5 L -u , pl, Z.) � �- ") � ,a g z :) , , - , < L , Q� L,U Z) ,� < LU ,� ( 7 'o �� LU < 0 0 , Lu 0 = ) = Z Z = _ 0 ,, 0 , �5 . 2! Z . 0 :Z , Z 0 0 0 . . 1� 0 L) , , z - z L) ,) Lu < of - �- CZ 0 0 LL, T5 .- - 0 0 L� (:, ol � I z I oz 2-: o ::) 'Ll LL, - P 10) g .0 ZE 0 F L,L, Lu o ow > __ �E M Lu F § Z C, ID [L , 0 < LL F-- �- LU -: 0 2 �- = C) < LU of ,Z,�, z � LL, � F-- F< < 2i [L 0, (0) - D� _) _ _ _ _ -- - d L: co� < C) w � Lu O F-- =: Lu 2 (,) C) . , C, U) , LU < Z Z) 0 a - 0 L) < �- D L L,L LL, ol� :� �: FOE 3: M, , , , < -, �: Z, .3 > , , [ LU LL 0 3: C) >- z E ,<l) I z ,6 , > . < Z) I w 0� G� LL - - -- - w Lu co D , Lu , K 3; < Q E z � Lu � , . . >1 ir � =-� IR C) ID J - - < > L. 2. ,. .< ,-, -. - - 9 z < ul ;� , = I Lu LL < -,�-, (.0 d ,z Z- � ,-) -0 -> z z ) U) Z LU = w 2 � , = - o 11, �Z- ,L,Ll - . - Lnu Z< R� <� g� - g z ) 11 = ,- LU , I � � � o ,-, o 5 21! 'LL, Z, Z. =, .1 ,n L -L, () E r zo z I z - 0 F-- � C) C) 0 0 < LL Z LU 5 -- < z U) 0 0 af LU Y� . C) - , � . . , � Lu - C) - P: !� z Lu ,< - 0) 2, zo 6f ,- o (j - 2-E <. ., o Cc, < ,- < ,,� 5 ,- - (--) > C, 2 E -'.:, ow - �� IL, (-, P: ,b w c=, 2 ,O) 1<1 . a Q> � wo Z< 0 1 (L Lu ,E,i � E,2 !2 ,O L'u, 0<� L=L:l < < -� Lcu� (L)L� - < F., �-::' zo OD5 8 -2 ,uj) , , z z , a -' �� -c � G� P= C) J ,W, T . -I ,I, � 55 Ei ,< n' � z � - 'i 2 ,z ,w z a - Lu 0 0 =: 0 ,< 0 Ul) Cc) 15 2, <w ,U I - I-- I I < - - <' or �W� �05 Q § F= w x w, 0 x ', c, I !S " z) - < '00 >- � L,u E 'a� Z�, =, > =w z ' w ' W, - - z 0, �>, -s � t 0, -� ��5 ,-,) -W t�:: �Z, wo ,-, ,�,,- -- � �<, -< Lu ., 7 n - 6i Z z , z z I � " LU � m L� 0 - U5 w � z - in 07 w w z Z ) �, cwo 2 �,- F-- - U I-- 0 ,< ) �, =,� :1 � 1z, �, �- :L::)) oft ,I Z G� �- < 1,0 D 0, t� � Lu , - ::) z �- w � ,E Lu 6 T, < C, F)f -� W, ,<:: lz z �- ?�: 0 2 � U) � , � E 30; < zo ,= 0, - �- -<) ") w �- S2 Z, T C) C) U- E 0- L L 2 < - , 'r " 2 < = � , 7 < �, < E W C, < w u z - - Lu z = �- - :� W> 5: U -j <. -.�, C) W, 'L L�u of T, :� - I 2 - �= ::) 3: �- G� 10 I-- �� < , w z , 0 L�u � :::) � w , L� 2 0 < �= - 0 L < � iol� < - LU I < 7 < = ow : " � , - W�l Lu , -- . , 6 lu = cy, - I � 1 -2. ;i - . - < <. P pl= =0 1= = � = 0 z W< D = 3: a, 0 LU ZO p: ) . - LU LU LU z �o � ui = � - 0 0 z = Ji , -::, .: l< - - 'o L. W, ,,� t - = , = o- 55 = , L,j = > . w < =0 < ow� 0 P 0 � 2r L .::, L) U) [-- �- z co W L2 � 0 z O, �? ,F af < ,W co ;� w 0- . 0 -,) I-- 2 , Z) " C=O: 0, Fo I --) in Z c yu 9 n- , �- co 0 < �� ,= �- C), 0 0 " co � � w Lu > G� z 0 � u - L, z o � , L Lo. ,< IL L,nj w 3x; w L X z M, . . . X . . . �� - 0 CO 0 CO � 0 w x �- a- LU x � L � a- X , - z w w > Lu w L>u 1, Z5 �- F--) g (> T c',) >, 2: I LD 0,� ,U) co m< owg � � -� 3: U) , m) 0 < 2 C) F-- x 0 0 L, � 0 0 I-- LU C) , �_ Z p: 0 0 < � < Z LU < C) �e W 0 LU , LU O- CO 0 �- 0 0 , 0 = 0 0 L) 0 w w ,,� 0 < �- 0 0 = cn �- LU 0 0 = < (D CD 0 0 z ll� Z) F-- X W �� 0 0 - �< U 0 =) CO af 0 � LU C) �- Lu � z 0 z - - 0 0 - � W 0 ,6 0 ) � Z 2� , 0 ,z o 0 0, z , < W - .- -Z P: . .. , 13): ,w LZ =) co C) = = = < X 0 Z) = z O� �-- 0 w G� O w E uj 0- �- < x L) 0 0 x I -- Lu owl W. I-- L) li 3: < Lu 0 � LD w x Z z = ) co , �- = Z o , L 0 -- 0 F< 0 - U) - z W , - -. 2� ,. , z - , = �e F-- u F-- �- 0 F-- F-- 0 < [-- Lu CO W U , �-- W L) U) LU w 1 3�. � ,� s :) < ::� = =) LU U) - < z F-- 6 � ,,� - = 0 z ID a� < L) z , G� L) o C) >- ir a , w L) U) �i F-- , ' 2 F-- �5 in >- �- < Q� CZ z > � 2 W O F-- C) o- � z F-- L- F-- z < , rj� F-- �-- 0� F-- [L �- F-- z < � 0 �- w 2 Z) 0 n Z o Lu 7: F-- 0 LU Z Z , Z 0 LU U) 0 L� Z � X X U- = P: 0 0 �� C) 0 �- af Z - 0 z z C)f W - F-- 0 z z 0 0 < 0 LU z ,-- , , Lu 0 Lou� Zz 2 0 � 'o < = C) z n- Z) O O 0 0 w C) C) �- j Z �) LU � 0 < E a- 0 Lu 1) , w 11 0 z C) < o' ) =) Z < x - jj LU C) W Z Z, E < �- cn � , < CD CD 0 �- 0 0 z 0 < uj > < [ z =� Lu G� C) < L 0 � CO - It o ll� Ei 0 , ll� , �� z Lu < 0 P: 0) Lu Df 0 �- 2 L) fje ae 0 �: ,)f m F - w = 2 � 3: C) :� � -- __ 7 u 0 �- w - - '. - F, L=,) - - - - , = , . < < of L� Q� Z) ca 0 �- - O- U) -- - < -- -- -- -- L/) Z, z � , I L, P- � z < 0 z z z u 0 < z z 0 < z F E L. 0� :Z Z 0 u F-- W C) ,,� 7i 0 cq 0 0 C) �- 7, lz , =) , z 21 " < C") " " "f 0� �- , :� LLU) " z ol = F -j 3: 0� F 1) < -: C) n- x 5 ? �� w z z F-- � P 3 3 O- P- af >- x 0 z =� � Lu o �4 � ,<,- cz F -L6 SQ o o - I E-) z 2 1 � t5 w n IL =i I > , , , L z 2: uj , a- L) Lu �5 ,Z a- w z 9 Lu ,z ca ,a� < C) Lu C) 'D Lu (n , o 7, Lu C) o w 0- < -- Lu 0 U- >. -- x 0 Lu x 0- < � � Lu 0 0 z =) C) 0 F- � = of z 0 LU = 9 'LLI 0 0 of z 0 0 0 �2 E = 0 0� 0 z w , Z>-O=)Ozoocn = 3: o =) � w � LU 0 0 � = . w -2 oz < � f1r) ZO LT - z a- 9 w P: j= 0 Z � Lu < LU =) �- Z C)- U) I = 0 D a_ w 0 = z w a- z 0 LU z = Lu Lu = 5 a- � m w Lu Lu =) U) co 0 0 = 3: a- o �5 0 < .�i �- z 0 LU 0 0 a C� U) = 'n U) U) W < 0 C) N - F- cn � - 0 co CL C) F- - 0� < 0� < C) F- 0 Lu C) K Lu c) ckf � C) CL P C) (L < 0 f- F < I 0 C) ff - F- F- (n 0� �; 0 � co 0 = C) 0 < U L) L) 0 CL a) C) �� CL U Lu C� - < co C) < 3: C) of 3: z 3: o C) < < � < < m z G < C) < C) =) < F-- C-) z LU 6 �, C� 16 'i ui C6 ,-� �6 6 6 �, C� 1� li li ol -: C� C� 4 ll� 16 r-� C6 C� - - - - - - - - - - � � N N � � 3: 3: llID3clSOacJ'iVY LU > > 'IS IldVVY 'S '3AV ID]dSOacl 'I LU I IAID w Ln W I C) j U LU Z .0 uSacfiv 10 M/ (1) LLJ Q9 0- 0 o < 421 w C) l�i z SIJOI i33NIS 3]c]V P: 1) 0 z LU - Q) LA 86 x 0 LU NOJ SININIAO&IM 9NIN33NI9N3 IVNIJ L Lu U 0 LU LU ED >0 0, 2E � 0- w Z LU Of w0 2 -1 LU LU ED w -i 0 > > D < LL 2 a - LU d LU Of LU 0 m 2 0 CO LU z co < 0� LU (D cc F- . . . .. .. ... .. . C, Stl r w w ll "1D3dSOacJ '1W AI > w '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSONd '3 W Q9 0Z LU Lpci 86 �td Q 9 J J W 7 LU NOd S1NINIAO&IM 9NIN33NI9N3IVNld i. z zLU LU z Y J 2 M W W W W J >a >¢ > �a a ¢ z ❑ rn > U °- ¢ w O F > N ❑ Q _Oz ❑ Oz W o a N o O zof ❑ >-U U) Y _ U, ¢ Q S z U U tz W tz O U cc W vJ CO = CO U a 00 (7 z w w ll "1D3dSOacJ '1W n I a> w '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSONd '3 Z W LU Lot 86 �1 N J_ 'f l �/�O�f� ��l�l�f/+t) ' 1 3 r� 3 !l Ib b/3A C� W SIJ01133NIS 31dbZ "IIN a Q o ! V .M - L � w�O ?JOd S1N3W3/�O?JdWI 9N1?J33NI9N3lt/Nld Q Z ~ ~ J W W Z ¢ W W W 2 W F ¢ ¢❑ 7 a a ¢ Y co ❑ 7 F W ¢ ui W < O o z w ¢ w ¢ ❑ z z a ❑ a W �� ;� U co Y U ¢ 7 ¢ Z U U ui F w O U (Ifo U) m 207 U a m N O Z O N O N z Z do £' 1,0 133HS SDS - �11\1I11-!OiVN uMMMMM iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 111111111111111111111111 11 111111111,,u llill mm limIll I MM M iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 11111111111111111111 7,1111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 MMMMMMM III iiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii MMMM O °p Hill 11111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 O In r 1 MMMM iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 26.4' • i p ................... ��::.:.� . I� 07� .......... •' ' .. :: - ..: :. -r. ' ' o -DAWS ON DRIVE 40 ;10 SPACES AT24 2:.:::..... o m,' '• N o............................... 1 ..... 20.6' i I 21.5' B -B o Fn O 27'01 BB 7.0' Q I '3 i 90 II V -0Jf o m LU I f `o J , w o Ic� VZ II V v O YLL U .:j .:.:::::::::::: - O Ap. O 90 Qu N m I L6 L r Z cfl co J II a I L W LL N -� a '.co I LOU aLij F� - ., Nm .....--.-..: ..: ...:.. U LU a ❑ O _ m... _ ........ w ,• ....................... .. .. .. .... W —r— wLU LL,❑¢ V/ J W a Np w0a :.. w, 7.0' I� 20.6'• � 9.01 LJLJ r M. ,V O O' ° • Q C) • v .. .: Q co �d � '. .• -- ............. ¢ .............. r. ............. .............. 6z m z z a a9.0 ` �' Z J J II co LL .. :;; 27 0 '. 7.2 ) o- - :... 1 ........................ ......................... "..:: .:::.....:::. ................... ......... W :„, •. O W a W IL U) .. a n.. v. O° U) Z JEL r O (7 m cD Q O W a z a 02 LLJ U) L) OEZ w o W U co a ❑ � rye. > . W U o� Er a ¢ � ao ❑ 0 jj p ,. O Q e .o r .. moo¢ LU N d _ W�a LU 0 p O 70' va vv . dso B �S�z ,,.,, h N. Q, oa b I f w mo w w ll "1D3dSOacJ '1W n I a> w '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSONd '3 Z w nn > J r LU J > r , ' 1 3r� 3!lIbb/3A C� ,, W Sl 0113 X115 31 d bIN a Q 0 V M I LU 0 N N NOd S1NINIAO&IM 9NIN33NIDN3IVNld Q v� LU 11 'iD-9rJSOdd IVY IS 31cJVVY 'S '9 '3AV iD3clSOdd '3 LL, > Lu I I A I D < LU LU LU C) Mm Z W N 40 IS (D < < mp !2 > > I U Sly 133NIS 31c1V LU < Of 8 > CR o �JOJ SiN3VY3AOdclVVI DN1d33N19N3 IVNIJ L I . ... ... ... ...... .. .. .............. . . . . . . .. . .. LL ................................................. . ........ ........ ........... ........... ............ ....... ... ......... < ISA�7CUA117 S C%4 LU LU 0 LU LU Cj) Z LU F- LU LU U) a (L w w ll "1D3dSOacJ '1W z n I > w '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSONd '3 g z ¢ a L j ,. Q VSIc f/�f lv M O .0 +L YI, o m LU S1J0I 133?J1S 31dbIN a " z N J J Q LLJ �_ °' 11 < Q� O Q 0 z N N ?JOd S1N3W3/�O?1dWl 9NR133NI9N3lt/Nld " II' '' � L7 I w LU l "1D3dSOacJ '1W z n I a> w '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSONd '3 g w N LU 10 M/ LLI Oil ?2 Lu N SIJO 1133NIS 31dbIN a - i! z ° V N00 ?JOd S1N3W3AO?1dWl 9NR133NI9N3lt/Nld Q 0 H W I H W I - Q cD Q o F z oN 00 N = N 0 O N 5W II O � J Q LLI O W N O i 0 0 � � W J O W W Q O 'r I� it c' O III iii IIII ■11� " I - G = - ■IIS■ - •✓ - G - ■111 � ■111 S G = - G ■IIS G •O G " ■IIS■ N r1 � 1 rVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVV G " r ��►r'Ii��r`i - Ii��''I��'��I� ��i�I ��ii�L��I��i�'��i_L��i i�il a a �-" - r► � v i 11iD3dSOad'iVV '1S31c1VA'S?'3AViD3JSOad'3 I I A I D LU Of 111 1:1 rn LU.................... ... .............. LU < < Z 0 CD ILI III LD 3-1,JVVY SIJOI 133NiS LU n 'o (5N :S 80J SiN3A3AOaJVYI 9N1d33N IDN3 IVNIJ 1.11) Lu OU C.- LU LU z < LU la� F-- 1, F- D z z 0 0 LU C) 0 0 LLI 3: Lu LU P: z F- 0 U) Lu 0 — < F- 0 Z z loo LU Z LU x X Of LU C) 0. LU F- LL, C) LU 3- W LL, z Lu � z 0 F Lu 01 =� 0 Elf LU 0 0 ?ate cf) F -1 LJ 3: lliD3clSONcJ'iVV LU > > IS IldVW 'S ']AV ID3dSONd 'I z W, I I A I D LU la� F. I J � - .......... LLI. . ..... .. LU N/w/m NO Z CD 0 LOC1 $%939 rel 0 < 00", TOx vi IN LU x, > /3 SiJOI 133alS 31clV Z F" IL Z , �) 0 Q LU NOJ SlN3VY3AONclVY1 9NIN31NI9N3 IVNIJ u loll z E < .1 0 OZ ow .1LU < of < D 0 ol 10 ¢o <, Wj 0 0 < as °T L) 2T -fn fn Z (0 LU < CL ID C) =,(L 0 , Oz L, S2 aao 7)0' < < ssZ Z 0 z nU � -0 z LL 0 Z� 0, < ❑ 1, O I 0 < zo z 1= 16 ., T .0 Nz EE 0 mw de X 0 '00 OWLL1, > 0 -I, z 2. zUrn ll<, ol I ol 11 01 o < z -- ------- z 0 CF 10 nt LU 1, Z 0 15 LLa� to ------ ----- -------- ............ . ........ ........... . ....... .......... z z z 0< z < Z .................. .......... --- - --- ---- ----- - - - . . . . ........... ..... . .......... -------- ra 7:7 T 0. < C) 2 OW z u) < LU of 0- LLJ U)o V, LU Q cl LL < tz z < ten012 C) > C)< Jj < LU LU < z u) .......... ........ ...... LU ..... ... . .... . ... LIA of 0 C) 0 7 Z x < Of < 0- uj co I 3: 0 0 3 U vm Z 6 z 0 u 0 0 0 .2 M .0 .1 ILL p nE < 0 5 E 0 ID Lo :s 0 0 —i ILL o0 LU (dA ot 10 0 UIN112 LU z E 5 LL. 0 ol E 0 0 O a K x o U) . t LU E . ! -0 0 LU co 52 �; , 0 < �- 0 4 E LL 0 0 -2 .0' EO :BE 3 .0 2 X 0 AO E o E ui 0 0 o Z 0 fV 0 a) cow" 0 E 0 C) E C) So Lu ao I C, Lr) L U)I- 0 L) U) z < 0 < LLI < LLi z C) E-: Z,LZL, LL, L) - 0 2 < Lou l< U) LU 0 , —i co 0,6 . �,4 8� �o: I 0 'M <z < 0 L (.5 6 U) < 0 LLUx U 10� D UZ) F-- T, 0-1 AA qlP!7 o y m ug 2 Lou ILL 2 F- ED ILU),>" LU 'o (3 -E' E . - o lo -E' am E� -2 -o 2 lo W 0 0 Lou� Z Z LU < C) o2 o o - o >- F- 2w o Lou OFF E E 0, 0 U) Lu 15) <m 0 w l< >m 10) ic� U) W, 0 x LLI w z u) LU Lu Fu) Lu Z >0 IF F- < 2E o k LLUU LLI lc� 0 LLI 0 0 LL, o b d b 0 2 LLI Lwu G- a 3: on z Lu 20 Llu� L -L, �- , -- < LL 0 C) <Q LU P, C, 0 W �: @ XLU X < W A L C.) Of 0 -- 0 T 0 Lwu co Lou co U) 2 Lu Lu x w k U) LU LL w 0 X LL LU Ne < = < LU z. . . . . . . . . . z LU z 0 LO 0 0 F- LU X LU LU w LLI < Lu x < K0 A 2 < A lo� 0 0 ILL F— j LLI LU LL 3: 0 0 3 U vm Z 6 z 0 u 0 0 0 .2 M .0 .1 ILL p nE < 0 5 E 0 ID Lo :s 0 0 —i ILL o0 LU (dA ot 10 0 UIN112 LU z E 5 LL. 0 ol E 0 0 O a K x o U) . t LU E . ! -0 0 LU co 52 �; , 0 < �- 0 4 E LL 0 0 -2 .0' EO :BE 3 .0 2 X 0 AO E o E ui 0 0 o Z 0 fV 0 a) cow" 0 E 0 C) E C) So Lu ao I C, Lr) L —i co 0,6 . �,4 8� �o: I 0 'M CD 3 k9l, 15, o U) < 0 6, 6 E L Boa s > z z K TE' 2 0-1 AA qlP!7 o y m ug 2 Z) 'o (3 -E' E . - o lo -E' am E� -2 -o 2 lo U) o2 o o - o Z 0 L) o, -2 lo: E -m, 3 -�, ' �. E 75 IT., o.-.. E a E a. LU Z > o. E� I E t5 -E T o W 0 3 E= 0 z 0 IIII W IIII �a co 00OfIII < C) W 28 OU E 2 0 > A 0 ZE < 0 f 'o 'o < o- 0 x LLJ A X 0 W x C() <,) w HT E < r < E LU �3 z, > W W w < 0 n_ LU mU = W LL, Z z 7 0 uIvq.M 0 IZKHe Bw UIN c ui 0 ui C) Z LU LL A 3: 3: ll LU AI < > LU 'IS IldV'S '3AVID]dSOacl W VY 'I LU 11D U C) LU .0 LLJ 0 o < C) < ELI SIJOI i33NIS M U) m Lu V, LIU - 86 .M > Hl� OdclVVI 9NIN3]NIDN3 IVN 0 x 11 NOJ SINIVYIA �4 ju L r, w w ll "1D3dSOacJ '1W > > '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSOacl '3 W 11AID <W w w LOCI $6 X39 d O < J c SIJO 1133NIS 31db a T- U) u) W F— O N NOd S1NINIAO&IM 9NIN33NI9N3IVNld Q Z w w ll "1D3dSOacJ '1W n I > w '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSONd '3 z w w w LOCI 86 �9 d O <J c Lu ;'SIJO 1133NIS 31dbIN �! m W F- N N ?JOd S1N3W3/�O?1dWl 9NR133NI9N3lt/Nld " " '' Q vi w w ll "1D3dSOacJ '1W a w w '1S 3ldbW 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dSOacl '3 C (1) LLJLU LU- Y, . > ' ' w 51�0� 133?J1S 3�dbIN a z M ELI u 3 f fel f3 1 ICs }./3A. Ce W � "' w Of 86 .M LU ?JOd S1N3W3/�O?JdWI 9NRI33NI9N3lt/Nld O ' W 11iD3dSOad'iVV AILU '1S31c1VA'S?'3AViD3JSOad'3 11DCf jj LU u .................... 0 0o ... .............. LU ZIMMI/m/m/ < < Z CD VY j— SIJOI 133NiS 31c1V LL1 LU Of '0 ZO- 'L U 80J SiN3A3AOaJVYI 9N1d33N19N3 IVNIJ 7 u 0 z 0 m0 z Z❑ as > x < 0 Owl Owly Z z 0 z < A 0 W . z0 0 z c z z m w I < 0 Ow. ww- Z w ¢wmwm < W~ z 0 w L) < LU -W� c LU CO �� c) W Z < Z w U) CD > , X Lu w Ow z 0 > 2 w 0 ILLI 0 X > w (1) >Wimzi ai w CD co < < > 0 m (Z' W, w < , �: w 0 z z < 0 w 0- 00 < 0 w (D <<1 N ZsmX w, o - x 01 1< c 0 Z 05 w W 00 ON M O�lx w z w x C) O z < -CY z .V/C 0 0 zm 2 LU a x w F 0 CD 0< 00 LU w ui w -Z m w 0 U) 5� w < Z x 5 LU 0 0 C() 4NM W — 0 D 0 D 0 0 Z w Z� 05 < 0 ly 0 ` z *� 0 w X w 00 C < CW LULU C) U) 0 1-- F- LU 0 > z EE '6 M inL) (f) LU Z 0 Z LU 2 LU LU LU 0� C) Z 0 C) 1-- z 0 -S- Z 0 Z <,6 0 OZ w CD <Z < K, z 2E!� � 07 O.0 < CL Qc"IZ C, 1. Z w 0 Lu < A Lu:, .2,xLU - =� co c w D LU w < 00 0 F-- Z Z 5 CO 1-- S < co 2E :W,:: 2, '.2 ohUO 0 z wz �i Y Z' 0 QzhQ Oz 7 ou�' z 0 0 5 [r , 0 di- CL Z W w I4 Mir J J Er C) Z 0, 0 LU Z 0 O cj LU < En U) Ice 0 0- , az < Z < <I-- 0. x U3 4) CL U CL co 9. 1 � T W a coz < W h. x < L) (D - E LU 0 CL r Q 1Z Lu w w u) X > LL! < U) I < ` C D (0 0 LU < Z 0 1-- C) A 0 C) < < 0 .2 asoma LU o 46. > < z0 m IaAV�UdONII z < U_Co z Z < w z T, T --W, M F- w z, ,) I. , 0-Z 1-1 6 m LU , W 0� C) Lu Z 0 C) 1-- z 0 -S- Z 0 Z <,6 0 OZ w CD <Z < K, z 2E!� � 07 O.0 < CL Qc"IZ C, 1. Z w 0 Lu < A Lu:, .2,xLU - =� co c w D LU w < 00 0 F-- Z Z 5 CO 1-- S < co 2E :W,:: 2, '.2 ohUO 0 z wz �i Y Z' 0 QzhQ Oz 7 ou�' z 0 0 5 [r , 0 di- CL Z W w I4 Mir J J Er C) Z 0, 0 LU Z 0 O cj LU < En U) Ice 0 0- , az < Z < <I-- 0. x U3 4) CL U CL co 9. 1 � T 2,2UJ coz < W h. x < L) (D - E UJ a cb LU 0 CL r Q 1Z Lu w w u) X oio� trw ` C w 0 0 4 > 70 of < 0 .2 asoma in m o IWC > < z0 m IaAV�UdONII z < U_Co z Z < �� z T, T --W, M F- < < Z < <I-- 0. x U3 4) CL 9. 1 � T LU C, coz < W h. x < L) (D - E UJ a cb LU Lu w w u) X 0 0 w 0 13� D`jY =)0 < 0 (D m D m < LL < Lu w 17- IWC S < 0 F-: < LU j :� .1) z z Z0 0 Lij C6 L" - 7"w w -C, W zo ZI?. X0. 4Q mu. pQj CL U) n 5. z z -7 �j L CIj p < < > 0 Z<Z I-- OOM 5 z > 3 , 0 �7 U) U5 < M 00 z 0. at o M> Z 0 1) z j < < < > < < m < z lWt3 E Ln M mo, < LL, :D ui 0 21 LULU < uj Lij Z Ld ui m vi aulO xx cc U. G <m 0 x P 0 T LL W > < < Li- LU 0 Z 0 0 (f) LULU C) U) z 0 LU -- 2 -- 0 LU z U) z < 0 lu < Z < <I-- 0. x U3 4) CL 9. 1 � T u) z 10 7j0 MW � < o x (D - E UJ a cb LU Lu w w u) X < 13� D`jY =)0 < 0 (D m D m C) w < �`� in S < >< LLJ x, U) LU �\I�y�- C/) 0 F- 0 z • > < w z < 0 lu < Z < <I-- 0. x U3 4) CL 9. 1 � T 0- k 10 7j0 MW � < o x (D - E UJ a cb LU ��OYm�l z < 0 lu < Z < <I-- 0. x U3 4) CL 9. 1 � T 0- k 10 7j0 MW � < o x (D - E UJ a cb LU w w ll "1D3dSOad '1W Z - w '1S 3ldV W 'S 4 '3AV 1D3dS0ad '3 lIAILU Cf D LU u CD fiQ4 (/(( Slt1b m > > _ LL]Sl�OI 133?J1S 3��Jb�W r„ N N LU ?JOd S1N3W3AO?1dWl 9NI?J33N19N3lVNl3 " ��-' r..; 7 V 0 -------------- ---- Fj:D . Q - Li iu 103 CL 13 J I�'17 i" vwii4 0 _ O y N G a J m a t x A Uyo�a �} a �0�, N .o O W > o .2U. o 00c) m J � � d J a NY� a W < h a H o ¢ �� 3 - 0 _ - E I" R. _ `i o o 6". C S 3 - L 7, 9 z 2 I B ¢¢ U y_ NS z _ � 0 7 I W;¢ i id8 z '4 G 3 i a K O� z� ax w a W p w w - 0z LLE F Naw LU KZ = Z tiV z = O.. O v¢ 3 O u Q OF F L w Lr)O W_ 'NIW .bZ 2 J W M J u W D W J p] o O r U= W Y 0 z_ � ¢ n rr Z W O O_ m� CII Ln Q W ^ Ln No Z/I I II- CII w =2 � V V .` L't FLl FOui gE 30 QQ xFn xz5 °z�� 00 0 - a 5 �w �o w w �xz w� V VQ n W 7 5a� FF z z UQ0 W � 0 -0 z o W�a 0 mNw (n 2 J V d O FLL Z J OZ 2 ¢ Hw X O m � F E .z. m F YC W �Ny }J a xa1ce u r 3 3¢ ¢ 2: a a ^ C O w�Q d� mMm o w xm° 0 "Urn c O LLzz - F Z Z ry 2 ¢ m K � W U V~1 ~ �a Z o O o6oo DC7 V) V z yam Q 20,- W 0 O O Z wo w O 0 ULD O U) Lu V z0 O V > > U.)N 0 H I.Y 0 m m LCU) l 2 2 n I HFF¢ Z r o w ¢ ¢ V V z 0 4 F U OZ a J W Q W Q J 0 ( �( n W 0 W r /QO 1, C) I..L (n J W W J O 2 GZ G n/ W 00 U) U_ ° /H z n W (n r W 0. q d a CL LUz --< L. 4 LL Q o 11 0 cc QU U w i 0 z d zEll ¢ U Z q w ❑ z d Z W a p W c P. � � � � O r ti ¢z = p r I.v.. W r o Z � S fw T Q r rte- U n U. Q ❑ � w s ❑ \J O X Is uF ¢ Z m O W Lli U u Chi O Y 0 6 r J U n r limit q � Z p p 5 >O N F- 30 ¢ ? w¢ r r ZU W❑ w L w m D U p O� zv ¢g N N� ¢ s u n¢ �� z a �� wx ¢ ¢� vi zCO71 m r ww ua Qz Z zm w� z cn d ¢ rr cc U m O E- ¢ 0 0 0 ¢rF �d r Q W Z 'i Z d ¢' ¢❑ Z W WU U3 -� 7 U U b ❑ M �.._ C� O I) o w w a z a O W O o g w o�-j Era a c 4D F HO° a O 4 � O -Y U � 2 N w o N F } i o = o5}oL ` q � m Im O J ui _ Zm > .� Gz t� o am ?oaco '� [=ter 1 �� jj�i c E m H. G o WWW ..pW �OaX y u O 3 i w Ea gm Zw_ p1z OVA C O amNn G6C}� �GN�i a gOO,'"i p77 ZZ 25avzie2 3 p . J W ❑ Z O W U) 2 U Z W w 1.--------- E - (D Lu J U U U) a Z Lu § 3 Q Z a_ Q � 2 ��' 0 CL z o� wn-¢ o z` 0 z a- LD w 0 `i2 W m c < O �. w z ¢ mJ G m � }+ r lL m ] >O 3 d (9¢� w�Wi ama c7 O i0 al © y Y U w�-: J I io CC w w {] f cc% a z Q cc Z 4 .- _ (7 J w XZa W Z p F- wQ: o�� 1�u�0 moo a Li € > uj u © a D w r J O LU w: Zi 111D3dSOad'1VV A I '1S31c1VA'S?'3AViD3JSOad'3 0 I I D > LU fr N LU u .................... ... .............. (1) LU ZIMM5 I/m/m/ < < Z (D CD > >VY SIJOI 133NiS 31c1V LL1 LU Of '0 ZO- 'L U 80J SiN3A3AOaJVYI 9N1d33N19N3 IVNIJ u N' L ,j 60 �-5 < L -U OZ 110 cc ;,z � �6 L5 n JJ a- z❑ ir W 0 C,) 4- L. > � `1 < C3 < L .0 '0 -W < Cc J1 wzzo :3 u CC < < uj �- Q �e cc w 0 m 0 LU twu ON W > 0 Im < CL 0 01 9 LL < z LL Zoo H < >. z z R Z�F X LL, T L CL r --C Lu 00 C) 11 F I 1 11:711111-- u li_`Wr> 0 Cr 0 p± CIL UJ x co 0 a 4) 0 y u f9 z z < a .0 Z Lu > < > az 0 In cc V cc 0 a til< 1# 1 �711 �=TH ,-11 IT 0 ON �Z, < > W Lu cc 00 w U N Z 0 Z < < > LIU WO < N16 Sg W. O'D L <, <j w w w i—..- 2. U, LIJ I > Z 1] 0 00 < m rr cr < (L u- 0 uj < LL� z w 0 mm 0 IN 0 Fi I— �4 ED, E 20 r R 'IN - - -n > W, LU 'k 0 3z LILI Z. W .0-11 1.1— . .. N T1 "5 IT -i" f � I 17i F 51 z > 0 7 E�J Tit . I ii., T uj 0 Lu Ld -.7, z Lu x 111111 0 0 z z < CD :5 cl LU < Z 0 U21 = < L) Z cl z V� 0 � k- z < > 7 0 n LU W LL, 0 z w z ui 0 < J :3 Q (1) 06 0 Hi �O co � �6 L5 n JJ a- z❑ ir W 0 C,) iW L. > � `1 < < 8 ><c < 'c > > > I cn 2 > < �O WCC w cc —j id W — o LJ L�, i 2 1. u D > zoagym < z cc )b < i4- zl� g r_ Eq ;� m x CL CL cu uj z < < CIL, LOj Lu Lj LL li� Lu < tr < 0 w z > z 10 2 U; ?: � < T Im w < cL w 0 > 0 ><: LTL, >< 0 N AV 0 < < LO 0 L La CL > 0 mo uj z Ejb % z z z O - LSF CC UJ 1, OZ < 2 L) In mi T WO 6 2 Z<� mOZ :-, < 2 z- Z- 00 w U <0 0 < ZO P Z< �b 'w cc m . I,- 2 w) t 1 S T, 2< 52 0 0 o C-- c- I u) < L-, 0 L-9 oo 0 L -u 11L LOL < Z o zz co Z") Z 0,2 LL, zrn < q¢ NC,❑ x U) 0 CM) W(D z N16 Sg W. O'D L <, <j w w w i—..- 2. U, LIJ I > Z 1] 0 00 < m rr cr < (L u- 0 uj S31HVA < < < ❑ ZE 50, 0 0 w4a w wa w w 0 mm 0 IN =aw :� �j = = < < 0 w z ui 0 < J :3 Q (1) 06 0 Hi �O co I z ❑>: z < < W < w zr LL ft In < Lj UJI L. > � `1 < IWO LLJ z u� u) w 0, ILL u) I. m< I- < g u , n, LL, z L, 5�7 < 9 < r, - < Lu W . , : Lj ul ::. G: 0 LJ L�, i 2 1. u D > w w 0 I< < >W Q a- uj z < < CIL, LOj Lu Lj LL li� Lu < tr < a w0 0 L) > I Lj ED , < IL Lu U z w 5 '0 FL a ILL uA w < < <, Cc) Iffi 6 -:, X 'XVVJ,.09 VV' 'NIW ZS ul ?: � < T Im w < cL w 0 > 0 ><: LTL, >< 0 N AV 5: w u 7, LO 0 L La CL > 0 mo uj u) <, < Im f'li < < 0 Lj LrL m uj u) o < 5 m LU 5L) > Lu 0 >1 z z z O 0 u) moz < u) cc < >- Z 0 oo - u, 7 EL < F ILDO u 0 Lij z I- . < 9 to :D U _j Lij m -j m > < mma Z 5 m juj < 0 cLcj Lj M u) u :r 0 < tz 0 " " w I m a_ 00 cn, u7-, L) '. w < < uj u- a_ m . I,- 2 w) t 1 S T, 2< 52 0 0 o C-- c- I u) < L-, 0 L-9 oo 0 L -u 11L LOL < Z o zz co Z") Z 0,2 Lz LD 7 > F- m S318VA tij L<j w a, < C) >w 0- x C-- < IuC CCD 8 F ' u] X IT -0 'a) EE iL-j < wx 00 < m rr cr < (L u- 0 uj 0 _j cc L C, co 0 _j < < a '0" cc 0 C) a -z Q: w 0 7�1 0 0�Qw w L, < < Lu III U co I.- IN w n7 EwE z z m 4 -, < w 0 u 5� u 5- w u M >- -14 � 2 x0 Z) < zO < <ZO < �m- (n I-- z D < 16 n m CT, W '. I z 0 L. > � `1 < 0 CL ❑0 z < Zs > < 2 > (n < 9 co w w 0 I< < >W CL 0 m 4- CL < a w0 0 L) > Lu > > 2 Uj CC < z Ic ffi 0) IT a i ") CZ5 ............. ........ J 'k, < > � > ?; T LU < W < L w, -2 OZ 11 -T 0 > 0 z 0 z L" > <> tai S318VA tij Z' 5 1.0 Q CC) BM wc c c) 0 'r w if 7 < ' L)O O z< > 75 w z G < < < , I , 1 0 , '. C w W '. 11iD3dSOad'iVV '1S31c1VA'S?'3AViD3JSOad'3 I I A I D m LU fr LU u .................... ... .............. LU < < CD VY SIJOI 133NiS 31c1V LL1 LU Of 'oZo— 'L U 80J S1N3A3AOaJVYI 9N1d33N19N3 IVNIJ 7 u 0 —j w 0 z 0 C) LLJ z z 0 W C-) U)w z U) 7 7 i 7 11 iu a) CL C uj CIP) CD Cb r.L a, s (n 0 (L Z (D VJ z 0 Ljj j 0 4 -CIL CID = 0 0 3: Z CD m 3 't 6 'o > o w 2 > z (D cd a. LU < < N L1 G1 CC 0 < w O Y Z W- I. �8, C., <. w vp T. IM ILL cc uJ ro- LG j z C5 ww LIL, Ln TLI a: w 0r > < Q I < w ILILI 02 W q w im < U) pl— C7 wo 7ZT <l— ow 73: C) 0 Z z Cc C., CL z CC < O�m m =w Z07 T,Z f-= <Z < < >< >w F�, M. —j w 0 z 0 C) LLJ z z 0 W C-) U)w z U) 7 7 i 7 11 iu a) CL C uj J 0— CIS a, s 0 > 7, z 3: - UA W Ljj j 0 4 -CIL CID = 0 0 3: Z 3 't 6 'o > 0 .2 ZTJ777777-� Ed. <1 < V; <L! z 0 Z z 'd IV �W E � III III, III, II I„III III III J O 0 z CL t cc Ljj j w. 4 -CIL CID = 0 0 3: Z > 0 .2 V; z 0 Z z 'd IV �W FL OF >< >w F�, M. ............................ S < 2 Z, R, T cw) E. 2 E � III III, III, II I„III III III -5 lliD]dSO8cJ'iVY E > 'IS llcJVVY 'S '9 'll ID3clSONcJ '1 0 11AID ui CD L "10,6'a LU LU 10, M/ . ........ .. Z (D 0 Z SiJOI 133NIS 3 ui Lu NVY OJ SINIIAJcI OVVI DNIN31NIDN3 IVNIJ >< —11' .......... . . ....... ....... ....... ...... ...... ... . . ..... .................Jm 1S N 700NI 7 3 Ar AV Im AL�Yj7**AeIA FEATURES &SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE —These specifications are for USA standards only. Check with factoryfor Canadian specifications. Square Straight Aluminum is a general purpose light pole for up to 35 -foot mounting heights. This pole provides a lighter and naturally corrosion -resistant option for mounting area light fixtures and floodlights. CONSTRUCTION — Pole Shaft: The pole shaft is of uniform wall thickness and is made of extruded 6000 series aluminum alloy tubing that is heat treated to a T6 temper to provide maximum strength. The shaft is uniformly square in cross-section with flat sides, small corner radii and excellent torsional qualities. Available shaft widths are 4", 5'; 6" and 6.75". Pole Top: Options include tenon top, drilled for side mount fixture, tenon with drilling (includes extra hand - hole) and open top. A cast aluminum top cap is provided for all poles that will receive drilling patterns for side -mount luminaire arm assemblies orwhen ordered with open top (PT) option. The top cap resists intrusion of moisture and environmental contaminants. Handhole: A handhole opening with grounding provision is provided nearthe base. Standard positioning var- ieswith shaftwidth asfollows:4" shaft, handhole at 1211; 5" shaft, handhole at 14"; 6" and 6.75" shaft, handhole at 18" on side A. Positioning the handhole lower than standard may not be possible and requires engineering review; consult Tech Support -Outdoor for further information. Every handhole includes a cover and cover attachment hardware. The handhole for a pole specified with a 4" or 5" shaft width has a nominal dimension of 2" x 4"; the handhole for a pole specified with a 6" or 6.75" width has a nominal dimension of 2.63" x 5'. Anchor Base/ Cover/ Bolts: Anchor base is cast from 356 alloy aluminum and is supplied with 4 nut cover disks. A full 2 -piece cast aluminum anchor base cover is available as an option. Anchor bolts are manufactured to ASTM F1554 Standards Grade 55,(55 KSI minimum yield strength and tensile strength of 75-95 KSI). Upper portion of anchor bolt is galvanized per ASTM A-153; bolts have an" r bend on bottom end and are galvanized a minimum of 12" on the threaded end. FINISH — Extra durable painted finish is coated with TGIC (Triglycidyl Isocyanurate) Polyester powder that meets 5A and 5B classifications of ASTM D3359. Standard powder -coat finishes include Dark Bronze, White, Black, Medium Bronze and Natural Aluminum colors. Classic finishes include Sandstone, Charcoal Gray, Tennis Green, Bright Red and Steel Blue colors. Other finishes include Brushed Aluminum, and Anodized Dark Bronze, Anodized Natural Aluminum and Anodized Black. Architectural Colors and Special Finishes are available by quote and include, but are not limited to RAL Colors, Custom Colors and Extended Warranty Finishes. Factory -applied primer paint finish is available for customer field -paint applications. WARRANTY -1 -year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitybrands.com/CustomerResources/Terms and conditions.aspx NOTE: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. Catalog Number Notes am Specifications subject to change without notice. Anchor Base Poles SSA SQUARE STRAIGHT ALUMINUM See footnotes next page. u 111111: 00111 IP 011,,. III;;; S S A SSA Square Straight Aluminum Poles IIIII IIIII Lead times will vary depending on options selected. Consult with your sales representative. Example: SSA 20 4C DM19 BA SSA Nominal fixture Nominal shaft base Series mounting height size/wall thickness Mounting' Options Finish10 SSA 8'-35' (for 1/2 ft (See technical Tenon mounting Shipped installed Standard colors increments, add -6 information table PT Open top L/AB Less anchor bolts (Include when DDBXD Dark bronze to the pole height. Ex: 20-6 equals for complete ordering T20 2-3/8" O.D. (2" NPS) anchor bolts are not needed) DWH White 20ft 6in.) information.) T25 2-7/8" O.D. (2-1/2" NPS) VD Vibration damper DBLXD Black (See technical T30 3-1/2" O.D. (3" NPS)3 TP Tamper proof DMB Medium bronze information table 3 T35 4" O.D. (3-1/2"NPS) HAHorizontal arm bracket (1 fixture t DNA Natural aluminum for complete Drill mounting4 FDLxy Festoon outlet less electrica16 Brushed Finish ordering information.) DM19 1 at 90° CPL12/xy 1/2" coupling' BA Brushed aluminum DM28 2 at 180° CPL34/xy 3/4" coupling' Classic colors DM28PL 2 at 180° with one side plugged CPL1/xy 1" coupling6 DSS Sandstone DM29 2 at 900 NPL12/xy 1/2" threaded nipple' DGC Charcoal gray DM39 3 at 90° NPL34/xy 3/4" threaded nipple DTG Tennis green DM49 4 at 900 NPL1/xy 1" threaded nipple DBR Bright red CSX/DSX/AERISTM/OMEROTm/HLA/KAX Drill mounting4 EHHxy Extra handhole'-8 DSB Steel blue DM19AS 1 at 90° MAEX Match existiing 9 Class 1 architectural anodized DM28AS 2 at 1800 USPOM United States point of manufacture10 ABL Black DM29AS 2 at 90° UL UL listed wit label (Includes NEC ADB Dark bronze compliant cover) DM39AS 3 at 90° NEC NEC 410.30 compliant gasketed ANA Natural DM49AS 4 at 90° handhole (Not UL Labeled) Architectural colors AERIST"' Suspend drill mounting',' (powder finish)" Shipped separately (replacement kit available) DMxxAST_ OMEROTM Suspend drill mounting',' (blank) BLTC Bolt caps FBC Full base cover (spun aluminum) DMxxMRT_ (blank) TC Top cap (with drill -mount poles) (blank) HHC Handhole cover NOTES 1. Wall thickness will be signified by the letter "C'; "G" or 1" C represents a 0.125" thickness, "G" represents a 0.188 thickness and "J" represents a 0.250" thickness. 2. When ordering tenon mounting and drill mounting for the same pole, follow this example: DM28/T20. The combination includes a required extra handhole. 3. 3-1/2" and 4" O.D. tenons available on 5" and 6" shafts only. 4. Refer to the fixture spec sheet for the correct drilling template pattern and orientation compatibility. Refer to the Anchor Bolt Matrix with Generic Template Link at httV://www.acuitybrands.com/-/media/Files/ c i y/Resources/Tools- - oc en s/Pole%2 eso rces/Pole%2 nc or e/ ri %2 oc ent/ c or of atri. ?l=e S. Insert "1" or "2" to designate fixture size; e.g. DM19AST2. 6. Specify location and orientation when ordering option. For' x": Specify the height in feet above base of pole. Example: 5ft = 5 and 20ft, 3in = 20-3 For "y": Specify orientation from handhole (A,B,C,D) Refer to the Handhole Orientation diagram on this page. Example: 1/2" coupling at 5'8", orientation C: SSA 20 4C DMI 9 CPL12/5-8C DDB 7. Horizontal arm is 18" x 2-3/8" O.D. tenon standard, with radius curve providing 12" rise and 2-3/8" O.D. If ordering two horizontal arm at the same height, specify with HAxyy. Example: HA20BD 8. Combination oftenon-top and drill mount includes extra handhole. 9. Must add original order number 10. Use when mill certifications are required. 11. Finish must be specified. Additional colors available; see www.lithonia.com/archcolors or Architectural Colors brochure (Form No. 794.3). AN 0U1111DOOR: One II... flhona Way Conyers, GA,300112 lhone: //0...922...9000 w ww,11it1hoinia.coin'i (D1 994 20118 Acidity (Brands 111..1g1hdng, Uric, 411l riglhts reserved. Rev. 1111/"15/"18 SSA Square Straight Aluminum Poles *EPA values are based ASCE 7-93 wind map. For 1/2 ft increments, add -6 to the pole height. Ex: 20-6 equals 20ft 6in. A B \ � ��f�Jf11111J11J11J1 i1�11,1111111111111JJ i1�11,11111111 ' , C I1� X11 HANDHOLE ORIENTATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION - EPA (ft2) with 1.3 gust Catalog number Nominal mo moft)unt ht. (un Pole shaft size (in x ft) Wall thick (in) 80 mph p 90 mph p 100 mph p Max. g webs) t Bolt size (in. x in. x in.) Approximate ship (Ibs.) SSA 84C 8 4.0x8.0 0.125 16.5 12.6 9.9 300 3/4x18x3 32 SSA 10 4C 10 4.0 x 10.0 0.125 11.5 8.6 6.5 230 3/4 x 18 x 3 37 SSA 12 4C 12 4.0 x 12.0 0.125 12.4 9.2 6.9 160 3/4 x 18 x 3 40 SSA 14 4C 14 4.0 x 14.0 0.125 9.3 6.7 4.8 120 3/4 x 18 x 3 50 SSA 15 4C I 15 I 4.0 x 15.0 I 0.125 I 8 I 5.6 I 3.9 I 100 I 3/4 x 18 x 3 I 52 SSA 16 4C I 16 I 4.0 x 16.0 I 0.125 I 6.9 I 4.7 I 3.1 I 90 I 3/4 x 18 x 3 I 54 SSA 16 4G I 16 I 4.0 x 16.0 I 0.188 I 11.8 I 8.5 I 6.2 I 130 I 3/4 x 30 x 3 I 74 SSA 16 5G I 16 I 5.0 x 16.0 I 0.188 I 15 I 11.1 I 7.5 I 280 I 3/4 x 30 x 3 I 83 SSA 18 4C 18 4.0 x 18.0 0.125 4.9 3 1.7 70 3/4 x 18 x 3 57 SSA 18 4G 18 4.0 x 18.0 0.188 9.2 6.4 4.4 100 3/4 x 30 x 3 80 SSA 18 5G 18 5.0 x 18.0 0.188 16.8 12.2 8.9 230 3/4 x 30 x 3 91 SSA 20 4C 20 4.0 x 20.0 0.125 3.3 1.7 0.5 40 3/4 x 18 x 3 62 SSA 20 4G 20 4.0 x 20.0 0.188 7 4.6 2.9 80 3/4 x 30 x 3 85 SSA 20 5G 20 5.0 x 20.0 0.188 13.6 9.5 6.6 180 3/4 x 30 x 3 107 SSA 20 6G I 20 I 6.0 x 20.0 I 0.188 I 22 I 15.9 I 11.6 I 230 I 1 x 36 x 4 I 155 SSA 20 6.11 I 20 I 6.0 x 20.0 I 0.25 I 30.4 I 22.6 I 17 I 300 I 1 x 36 x 4 I 202 SSA 25 5G I 25 I 5.0 x 25.0 I 0.188 I 7.2 I 4.2 I 2 I 110 I 3/4 x 30 x 3 I 130 SSA 25 6G I 25 I 6.0 x 25.0 I 0.188 I 13.2 I 8.6 I 5.4 I 180 I 1 x 36 x 4 I 180 SSA 25 6.1 25 6.0 x 25.0 0.25 19.7 13.8 9.5 250 1 x 36 x 4 224 SSA 306G 30 6.0x30.0 0.188 7 3.4 0.8 130 1 x36x4 210 SSA 30 6.1 30 6.0 x 30.0 0.25 12.2 7.5 4.1 170 1 x 36 x 4 258 SSA 32 6.11 32 6.0 x 32.0 0.25 9.7 5.4 2.3 160 1 x 36 x 4 272 SSA 35 6.11 35 6.0 x 35.0 0.25 6.4 2.6 -- 200 1 x 36 x 4 294 SSA 35 7,11 35 6.75 x 35.0 0.25 7.6 3.1 -- 150 1 1 x 36 x 4 290 *EPA values are based ASCE 7-93 wind map. For 1/2 ft increments, add -6 to the pole height. Ex: 20-6 equals 20ft 6in. A B \ � ��f�Jf11111J11J11J1 i1�11,1111111111111JJ i1�11,11111111 ' , C I1� X11 HANDHOLE ORIENTATION C IMPORTANT INSTALLATION NOTES: • Do not erect poles without having fixtures installed. • Fa(tory-supplied templates must be used when setting anchor bolts. D F I + B Lithonia Lighting will not accept claim for incorrect anchorage placement Default DM 19 due to failure to use factory template. is on side B. • If poles are stored outside, all protective wrapping must be removed immediately upon delivery to prevent finish damage. A Handhole Lithonia Lighting is not responsible for the foundation design. Of OU 1111) 0 0 II : OneII..iitlI'mi°iia Way Coni ers, Gl30012 Rlvi : 770...922...9000 wvv]lii ll,miriiia.coui'n C)11994 2018 AcOty ll ru,i II...ii ll°itih'i , Illu,ic. Melee rigll'its reserved. lie .1111/115/"18 POLE DATA Bolt Base Bolt projection square Shaft circle (in) (in) (in) Template Anchor bolt base size A B C Bolt Size description description 4C 8.5-9.625 3.125 9.938 3/4 x 18 x 3 ABTEMPLATE PJ50045 AB18-0 4G 8.5-9.625 3.125 9.938 3/4 x 30 x 3 ABTEMPLATE PJ50045 AB30-0 5 10.5-11.5 3.25 11.563 3/4 x 30 x 3 ABTEMPLATE PJ50046 AB30-0 6 12-13 4 12.25 1 x 36 x 4 ABTEMPLATE PJ50044 AB36-0 7 14.625 4.125 15 1 x 36 x 4 ABTEMPLATE PJ50130 AB36-0 C IMPORTANT INSTALLATION NOTES: • Do not erect poles without having fixtures installed. • Fa(tory-supplied templates must be used when setting anchor bolts. D F I + B Lithonia Lighting will not accept claim for incorrect anchorage placement Default DM 19 due to failure to use factory template. is on side B. • If poles are stored outside, all protective wrapping must be removed immediately upon delivery to prevent finish damage. A Handhole Lithonia Lighting is not responsible for the foundation design. Of OU 1111) 0 0 II : OneII..iitlI'mi°iia Way Coni ers, Gl30012 Rlvi : 770...922...9000 wvv]lii ll,miriiia.coui'n C)11994 2018 AcOty ll ru,i II...ii ll°itih'i , Illu,ic. Melee rigll'its reserved. lie .1111/115/"18 PLATE OUT DOUBLE 3450 PROJECT IIII IIII'IIIII11111111111111111 Maple Stree Lofts SPEC TYPE E1 NOTES ORDERING SPECIFICATION SIIII'IIII''"' II II 11111111 IIII IIII IIII IIII II IIII IIS IIIIJIIII IIIIIIII CODE MODEL d I'1E1[JE 3450 3450 PLATE OUT DOUBLE LIGHT SOURCE SOURQEILUMINEUSE LED.HO (WATTAGE, LAMP TYPE, OTHER INFO) LED REGULAR OUTPUT LED.HO HIGH OUTPUT COLOR TEMPERATURE 'T'IEIPI 'IR 'T'UIRIE 11)E U Ullwll"1UIIR 30 30 3000K 35 3500K 40 4000K VOLTAGE VOILTAG1E 120 120V 120 VOLT 277V 277 VOLT DIMMING OPTION "'T°IU II II' 11� CIR IIS 'T"IU d WHE BLKE DV 0-10V DIMMING (120-277V) LIGHT SOURCE: STRUCTURE FINISH IFlftl S'T°IRUCTWZE ANTE WHE WHITE FINE TEXTURE ANTE ANTHRACITE FINE TEXTURE BLKE BLACK FINE TEXTURE STRUCTURE: OPTIONS PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS C&IDAC1111 IIICi°'iiiillll'IIII 1111 IIII t IC°mIIIIIIII' IIIC"IIII"""1111""" a 0 10 9 0 DESIGN: Designed for use in corridors and public areas, these wall mounted indirect luminaires are outdoor versions of our Plate and are built to be rugged and withstand the elements. They are available in a classic simple version or with the extended double light source version. Both are ADA compliant and can be used indoors. WHE BLKE LIGHT SOURCE: Linear LED strip with self -modulating temperature control for an optimal performance and lifetime. Available with standard 0-1 OV dimming. STRUCTURE: CNC machined aluminum, die -stamped galvanized steel and four levels of die -cut silicone gaskets for secure weather resistance. 3450 DIFFUSER: Translucent frosted acrylic. 2.74" 5.00" CERTIFIED: CSA Listed to US and Canadian safety standards; 25°C ambient and wet -locations. 70mm 127mm IP65 rated 33.00" G040I11111' d IIICIIIT Tuonqies IPJ uuu 611µ:D, uudflJSb s dans Iles =.u116ir s et espaces nuubllJC S, ces appIJques rnu.u1 IIS 838mm I . W .1 iim i iii a�� il�pii�°p��p u..uT� a a ti.,Iruoua liunudouu.c o ntricsvei,.�kfl-n �q� e. � � � e ��t .q. Ili a �� a/ii�'q ��n, u�, ii° �� r-��„� it ��.e I�,p u:�� iiW"�q u^,�i, a��✓^up-,✓il','..wu u�1u ��/. u�: �iiy ^q pp�II III II II p q q p ✓^p� r-+; } p p IIT ! '�y��tll les bu u ee,':b Se.:� ey o M', n o I s 4��IIM,,,,.,�r V ,d N,.N II< Ilii II II � I I,,.J�0.^., I I ",.r.,pwllS^'7�Iliiir�l� 1 II s e �'�r..yJ' Iy II N. M., bry"�y II I II pyd�rye I s I ISI) I IIIA i"A I�yII� II p� 1pe e t ��. ii i II�V A) I{�,�II^y ^�M,� p. �& a4 pu'^h�, jM�,,,,. �e yA� IIII �.. gN��ryI �6 p� IIII IIII IVI tl tle "qe 1�IlI �ry & 6 e I'��II d N,p�r+�d"� avec s ��,�W I Np, rp N��.W I�� II IIII II tl.,��k 4�",q q'i;i� o q,��k b 1 b e ,] 1 N,�f� s Y o II t h,�+o II II III II li""M"+n�,",'N �I'„�➢ 1 4��M I��II M��d III II 0...'�:� ADA W. t �...M e q,�,� @Y e I'�� II �t pt Q A N :,, III 4� V.4�M 1111 ",.,ai � 4 s b 1 W III II Q 4 I c I.0 I �� J -BOX SOUIII CIII' III IIII U3III'II I ainde unurniiun uuse II1II 11 avec aliftocointr6 e de teiii1perature Ilnoijii a..une Ipa°Ilu:umuruaiii e Ana: duuiru 16.50" de Oe 011n�a°1iffu41eO feii-tave(l iii-adatloiin,�ut u.uUou,...10v/�� 419mm SI IIIfld0I UIIItlll:�� Xur6inlurn uusano IlnDau° u,.udu°TIIo iniiuunca liqu.uo, s ,Ver ga11gununaso ndT qlnb ot Ilp11a6 avcc 11 ,E Jj Iiunts 3.30" T°udnuu IIuTullr Iu^uu lu:u..uuuuIl.ITuu°Noun uuu uTGliulu'u:uuunuunl:uuIluTu'lin 84mm ��III111�111�USIII'�IIIII'�iIIII''f�� Aculliiuuivir6qirsiLusllu.uu:ulidc�� IIII IIIf III III Cain,ad e'(II: U. �� d l�:��au`r�Iln�:u u��U:u.uu'u:r ounnllnli undnn r�Tn"�� et eirnp11,ruceirnl ii its iniouu1il1116s uToiruforinie� II,aunorurn IIII:)6+ Eureka Lighting © 2017 www.eurekalighting.com V1.0-2017-09 ANATOMY PLATE OUT DESIGNED FOR CONCU POUR IP64 CONTACT EUREKA FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACTEZ EUREKA POUR INFORMATION ALUMINUM STRUCTURE Natural heat -sink CNC machined with fine MOUNTING textured exterior polyester Installs to 4"octagonal box finish (supplied by others) 3449 LED LIGHT ENGINE ANSI binned white LED with 2.74" 5.00" on -board thermal management located inside of aluminum 70mm 127mm structure 0 19.67" o 0 500mm o 0 J -BOX MOUNTING � 3.1711FASTENERS • • 181mm • -� 0 3.30" 84m m 3450 EASY INSTALLATION • Sturdy 16 GA galvanized 2.74" 5.00" steel mounting bracket 70mm 127mm DRIVER HOUSING � MINIMALIST DESIGN Fits regular drivers Extended double light 33.011Easy mounting installation source indirect wall fixture 838mm can be mounted vertically or horizontally J -BOX WEATHERPROOF ��A•14 PRODUCT INNOVATION AWARDS Architectural 16.511 Self-adhesive gaskets PRODUCTS 419mm 0 Die -cut silicone sponges 00, 0 Fully sealed U 11 Wet location rated reddc:ri: award 2015 3.30" winner 84mm reddot 21 desigr world of SPECIFICATIONS 3449 3449 HO 3450 450 HO r24 LIGHT SOURCE 12 x Nichia LED 12 x Nichia LED 24 x Nichia LED x Nichia LED DELIVERED LUMENS* 394 lm (4000K) 562 lm (4000K) 787 lm (4000K) 1124 lm (4000K) SYSTEM WATTAGE -4.9W -7.3W -9.9W MODULE UL recognized - custom design CRI 80 CRI (typical) THERMAL MANAGEMENT Light Engine with on -board Thermal Management / Shade structure in Aluminum to maximize thermal performance LIGHT DISTRIBUTION Indirect VOLTAGE 120V or 277V DIMMING 0-10V Dimming (DV) SHADE STRUCTURE CNC machined aluminum / die -stamped galvanized steel / die -cut silicone gaskets DIFFUSER Translucent frosted acrylic STRUCTURE FINISH Fine textured white or anthracite exterior grade polyester powder coated ADA Compliant WARRANTY 5 years *Delivered lumens toward the wall. This does not account for the wall's reflectance. Eureka Lighting©2017 www.eurekaLighting.com V4.0-201709 outdoor tav 18 outdoor DESCRIPTION A metal frame is washed with brilliant LED light. Mounts down only. Includes (1) 11 watt 840 lumen 3000K 80 CRI LED module. Dimmable with a low -voltage electronic dimmer. 120v or 277v. ADA compliant. WEIGHT 6.751b / 3.06kg ± metal/bronze ORDERING INFORMATION metal/bronze model color lamp wet location OD735 MTBZ metal/bronze LED LED module 11w 120v W wet location LED277 LED module 11w 277v FIXTURE TYPE: JOB NAME: NOTES: 17 5X 444 mm 1 '5 nun w811 pro jv�llk,„terve 3.3 84 tett` 7400 Linder Avenue Skokie, Illinois 60077 T 847.626.6300 F 847.626.6350 www.lbilighting.com ©2018 LBL Lighting. All Rights Reserved. The "LBL Lighting” graphic is a registered trademark of LBL Lighting. LBL Lighting reserves the right to ett� change specifications for product improvements without notification. outdoor windfall outdoor DESCRIPTION Crisp lines and a slim profile combine in this handsome LED outdoor fixture. The indirect light bounces off the smooth, matte finish of the backplate. Mounts vertically or horizontally. Includes (1) 20 watt 1680 lumen 3000K LED module. ADA compliant. 120v or 277v. WEIGHT 4.631b/2.1kg± black silver ORDERING INFORMATION model finish lamp wet location OD785 BL black LED LED module 20w 3000K 120v W wet location SI silver LED277 LED module 20w 3000K 277v FIXTURE TYPE: JOB NAME: NOTES: 7400 Linder Avenue Skokie, Illinois 60077 T 847.626.6300 F 847.626.6350 www.lbilighting.com ©2018 LBL Lighting. All Rights Reserved. The "1131- Lighting" graphic is a registered trademark of LBL Lighting. LBL Lighting reserves the right to change specifications for product improvements without notification. Specifications EPA: 1.01 ft2 T1S Type I short TSVS Type V very short (x.09 I Length: 33" P1 P4 P7 (8.3.8 cirm) Width: 13" SPA Square pole mounting (:33.0 cirm) Height H1: 7-112" T2M Type 11 medium T51M Type medium 0 M CII Height H2: 3-1/2 " Weight 27 lbs (max): (122 lkg) A+ Capable options indicated by this color background. DmSer*ies Size 1 LED Area Luminaire Olt* + NIGHTTIME r�1 FRIENDLY "4 A �. �IIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII n W Introduction The modern styling of the D -Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. The D -Series distills the benefits of the latest in LED technology into a high performance, high efficacy, long -life luminaire. The outstanding photometric performance H2 results in sites with excellent uniformity, greater H1 pole spacing and lower power density. It is ideal for replacing up to 750W metal halide in pedestrian and area lighting applications with typical energy savings of 65% and expected service life of over 100,000 hours. ��llllllllllllll� J ��' q Z"�w p, EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA N LTAI R2 PI RH N DDBXD �iiiiiiii�ii�iii%ii��iJ�iiiiiii�iiiii�ii�iaii�iai�i�i�iiiiii�ii DSX1 LED DSX1 LED Forward optics 30K 3000 K T1S Type I short TSVS Type V very short MVOLT 3 Shipped included DWHXD P1 P4 P7 40K 4000 K US Type 11 short TSS Type V short 1201 SPA Square pole mounting DNATXD P2 P5 P8 50K 5000 K T2M Type 11 medium T51M Type medium 2084 RPA Round pole mounting P3 P6 P9 T3S Type III short T5W Type V wide 2404 WBA Wall bracket Rotated optics T3M Type III medium BLC Backlight control Z 2771 SPUMBA Square pole universal mounting adaptor E P10' P12' T4M Type IV medium LCCO Left corner cutoff2 347 4-5- RPUMBA Round pole universal mounting adaptor 6 P11' PIT TFTM Forward throw RCCO Right corner cutoff2 480 45 Shipped separately medium KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish)' Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLight AIR generation 2 enabled s PIRHN Network,high/low motion/ambient sensor° PER NEMA twist -lock receptacle only (controls ordered separate)10 PER5 Five -pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 11,11 PER7 Seven -pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate)10,11 DMG 0-10v dimming wires pulled outside fixture (for use with an external control, ordered separately)12 DS Dual switching 12,11,11 DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white IIIIIuuIII°° Vu° IVuI °VIIIIII; u° VVuIDSX1-LED VIIIA I Ium mlllllllll mullllf IuuuuIllllliRR„ One Lithonia Way e Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone. 800.279.8041 • `A/ VV.IIlIl(DI "J'' C)111I VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVVIIIIII Vu°"°'IIIVII"""""""ppul°IIVu ul"VIII"""""""'IIIIIIIII" ul1 III mIIIIuIIIIIuIIuuuIOu"ui , �ullll VIIIIII I I �� pui"',�uIIIVII "";'iilN'� �ullllll uIIIIIII �uIIIIVIII �� Rev. 12/18/18© 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting,Inc. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 8 Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. DLL127F 1.5 J Photocell - SSL twist -lock (120-277V)19 DLL347F 1.5 CULJU Photocell - SSL twist -lock (347V)19 DLL480F 1.5 CULJU Photocell - SSL twist -lock (480V)19 DSHORT SBK U Shorting cap 19 DSX1 HS 30C U House -side shield for P1, P2, P3, P4 and P517 DSX1 HS 40C U House -side shield for P6 and P711 DSX1 HS 60C U House -side shield for P8, P9, P10, P11 and P1217 PUMBA DDBXD U* Square and round pole universal mounting bracket (specify finish )21 KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 6 For more control options, visit �H C.. and I .> t '! online EGS- External Glare Shield JJJJJJJJJJIIiilll%%�%%%%%%%%%%%%//ll��%%�i��i r NOTES 1 P10, P11, P12 or P13 and rotated optics (L90, R90) only available together. 2 Not available with HS. 3 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 4 Single fuse (SF) requires 120V, 277V or 347V. Double fuse (DF) requires 208V, 240V or 480V. 5 Not available in P1 or P10. 6 Universal mounting brackets intended for retrofit on existing, pre -drilled poles only. 1.5 G vibration load rating per ANCI C136.31. 7 Must order fixture with SPA option. Must be ordered as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. For use with 2-3/8" mast arm (not included). 8 Must be ordered with PIRHN. Sensor cover available only in dark bronze, black, white and natural aluminum colors. 9 Must be ordered with NLTAIR2. For more information on nLight Air 2 visit sl'�s link. 10 Photocell ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. See accessories. Not available with DS option. Shorting cap included. 11 If ROAM® node required, it must be ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. Node with integral dimming. 12 Provides 50/50fixture operation via (2) independent drivers. Not available with PER, PERS, PER7, PIR or PIRH. Not available P1, P2, P3, P4 or P5. 13 Requires (2) separately switched circuits with isolated neutrol. See Outdoor Control Technical Guide for details. 14 Reference Motion Sensor table on page 4. 15 Reference controls options table on page 4 to see functionality. 16 Not available with other dimming controls options 17 Not available with BLC, LCCO and RCCO distribution. Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. 18 Must be ordered with fixture for factory pre -drilling. 19 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER, PER5 or PER7 option. See PER Table on page 3. 20 For retrofit use only. HANDHOLE ORIENTATION C D B A Handhole Fe. u°IIIIIate 1.75" for alumir 2.75" for other Top of Pole 0.563" 0.400" (2 PLCS) �73° .50 L 1.2.05- 1- 12.48 Tenon Mounting Slipfitter ** Illlluu�°°°. p„ llp„ °Vllllk' "'1111111111111111F,a Ippuw DSX1-LED millllll mullllll milli mippV °'llllllllllllllliuuumlppppll° Vl,,uuVlll uuuIIIIIIR;;;', One Lit h o n i a Way • Co nye rs, Georgia 30012 • Phone : 800.279.8041 s;° v l 1 s r c muppppui"'"Ipu°"'9111°°TIIIIIIIIIIIII'"„YNluj°IIIIIIIIIII°,,milllllll;°,illlllllll° °"V°""";;y"""11°"° © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.ll rights reserved. Rev. 12/18/18 ullll m rannc. Page 2 of 8 . .r �,, �, �, »,- „,,,, �� „,,,, wR To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting s II � ��„i i�, ,,, ,�!�i c.„.��ii; �„ II 17�w�,��r�, l ��,w�w�,,. Isofootcandle plots for the DSX1 LED 60C 1000 40K. Distances are in units of mounting height (25'). ..... .....0 LEGEND 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 :{ 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 "s 4' 44 4 ar v E. c 0.1 fc 3 3 3 3 vU �, 0.5 fc 2 2 J M 2 nm, y 1.0 fc „ , UI ( dII' crr K IIS, ! O O 0 �N 0 wwu ... ""fir,„ +” ✓ CJ..,•i. C%'.;Y �..:.�! Y,u�, •»,m R t Qi ":i &C..1 a I�,, 1 � - • - 4`. .. _. �� _ �, d,�. _. 0 2 e�i .ai 2 .....a 2 �i "W.ii 2 , ui -3 ., aT -3 61 -3 -3 r'auii zaii T1 S „� ..... ,,,,,,� �,,,,,,, �FFFFFFF T2M�T2S T3M -4 u -4 a.r -4 a -4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 qEu 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3b w, 2�ro u 2 a 2 U 2r IM h 0 0 0 0 �w,'` .IlA C�.F u � aw CX,'l ��;��. ��„� �� ,,,,,,,,,. q�, A ; n PPS ��F ; FFF� �, � , Y ..�FFF,�,iFFFFova Q) . ��.�.F m�FFFFFF,. FFFFFF W fur .'FFFo rn rI c- wK„ co r. C+If J ° C. 1 1 _ m 1 1 rw 1 { € 2 -2 i a -2 -2 e . wm.., .......1 ''?. -3 Da> -3 r� -3 r u u...0 rr 3 FYI ..... i..a..a c�, T3S °� TFTM TSVS , -4 Qa-4 aa' -4 as -4 p......., .... ....... �a c.: .....0 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 � 4 uJ 4 4 3 cs 3 3 ,�,' _ � �`, 2 U 2 D 2 2 &7 P ra, , A Diu '��,w , c6 rP,,1F 1 � I � .�} 1 i q � �� )! ot ,� o _�. � N � � �� i � � o ,,,, � ,,,,,� FFFF, ,,,, F, ,,,,FF��F,FFF. �, 00o � �� ., Cn e� ) �, `Iw 1 2 2 r _ _ 1 1 2 2 3 3 } HY, i _. r .... u...0 �” i a..a ,, � � 3 u u.ii 3 T5S T5M„� TI B LC �� u. 0 -4i -4 i -4 a> -4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4.., 4 , 3 c. 3 r� 2�lIf A j 2 d ” m N w w 0+ �. 0 C� as 1 1 ca 0; <v -2 -2 .....i 3 6i.. LCCO u.-3 RCCO .,...1 -4 Q) -4 Q) u°°°°°°°ui llllllllj° °I0 plVlll°"'"Illlllillllllllll One Lithonia Way Y • Conyers, rs, G e o r i a 30012 • Phone : 800.279.8041 `, rrvv l C1,0111 1 DSX1-LED I°�IiIIIIIIVIIII��iul 9 pIIpIIIYuuuul iiuuI1161IIIP IVu"uuu pVuuuuuu'VII„ IIII' " IVj°"°V°°°uuuuu c l uIIVVu. Rev. 12/18/18 O �� mulllll��uu�°;,,IIIIIIIII��,�� ulllll ullllll��uulllllll �;,��, 2011 Acuity Brands Lighting,Inc.rights reserve. 2018 AiBdLhIAll hd Page 3 of 8 lip Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Electrical Load "I W11 Phototcell Dwell Ramp -up Ramp -down lumiaire; wired to the driver dimming leads. State triggered) Operation Time Time Time PIR or PIRH 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 5FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures 3V(37%) 10V (100%) Enabled @ 1 FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min PIRH1FC3V �IIIII�IIIIIIII�II�IIIIIIIIIIIII �IIIII�IIIIII� �� are capped inside luminaire PIR or PIRH 0 0 - - from 0 40 C (32 104 F). Luminaires dim when no occupancy is detected. IIIIU IIIIU �, , i Also available with PIRH1 FC3V when the sensor photocell is used for dusk -to -dawn operation. 120 208 240 277 347 480 photocell and wireless communication. wirelessly connected to the nLight Eclypse. ai7ii�i��i � ��iiiiii�%%%%%%�� J��iiiiioai�iiii/ii 0°C 32°F 1.04 P1 30 530 54 0.45 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.10 0.12 5°C 41 OF 1.04 P2 30 700 70 0.59 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.16 10°C 50°F 1.03 15°C 5o°F 1.02 P3 30 1050 102 0.86 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.30 0.22 20°C 68°F 1.01 P4 30 1250 125 1.06 0.60 0.52 0.46 0.37 0.27 25°C 77°F 1.00 30°C 86°F 0.99 Forward Optics (Non -Rotated) P5 30 1400 138 1.16 0.67 0.58 0.51 0.40 0.29 35°C 95°F 0.98 P6 40 1250 163 1.36 0.78 0.68 0.59 0.47 0.34 40°C 104°F 0.97 P7 40 1400 183 1.53 0.88 0.76 0.66 0.53 0.38 P8 60 1050 207 1.74 0.98 0.87 0.76 0.64 0.49 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance P9 60 1250 241 2.01 1.16 1.01 0.89 0.70 0.51 Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the platforms noted in a P10 60 530 106 0.90 0.52 0.47 0.43 0.33 0.27 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM -80-08 and projected per IESNA TM -21-11). Rotated Optics P11 60 700 137 1.15 0.67 0.60 0.53 0.42 0.32 To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number (Requires L90 or R90) P12 60 1050 207 1.74 0.99 0.87 0.76 0.60 0.46 of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. P13 60 1250 231 1.93 1.12 0.97 0.86 0.67 0.49 0 1.00 25,000 0.96 50,000 0.92 100,000 0.85 Option Dimmed High Level (when "I W11 Phototcell Dwell Ramp -up Ramp -down lumiaire; wired to the driver dimming leads. State triggered) Operation Time Time Time PIR or PIRH 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 5FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *PIR1 FC3V or 3V(37%) 10V (100%) Enabled @ 1 FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min PIRH1FC3V Output Output are capped inside luminaire PIR or PIRH Motion sensors with integral photocell. PIR for 8-15' mounting; PIRH for 15-30' mounting Luminaires dim when no occupancy is detected. *for use when motion sensor is used as dusk to dawn control. Nomenclature Descripton Functionality Primary control device Notes FAO Field adjustable output device installed inside the Allows the lumiaire to be manually dimmed, FAO device Cannot be used with other controls options that lumiaire; wired to the driver dimming leads. effectively trimming the light output. need the 0-10V leads DS Drivers wired independantly for 50/50 The luminaire is wired to two separate circuits, Independently wired drivers Requires two seperately switched circuits. Consider luminaire operation allowing for 50/50 operation. nLight AIR as a more cost effective alternative. PER5 or PER7 Twist -lock photocell recepticle Compatible with standard twist -lock photocells for dusk to dawn operation, or advanced control nodes Twist -lock photocells such as DLL Elite Pins 4 & 5 to dimming leads on driver, Pins 6 & 7 that provide 0-10V dimming signals. or advanced control nodes such as ROAM. are capped inside luminaire PIR or PIRH Motion sensors with integral photocell. PIR for 8-15' mounting; PIRH for 15-30' mounting Luminaires dim when no occupancy is detected. Acuity Controls SBOR Also available with PIRH1 FC3V when the sensor photocell is used for dusk -to -dawn operation. NLTAIR2 PIRHN nLight AIR enabled luminaire for motion sensing, Motion and ambient light sensing with group response. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over -ride when nLight Air rSDGR nLight AIR sensors can be programmed and commissioned photocell and wireless communication. wirelessly connected to the nLight Eclypse. from the ground using the CIAIRity Pro app. U°° Illllllu' W1°""pppu°"iillllllllll Y • Conyers, Georgia cc One Lithonia Way on is 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 yr Ii l 1111 DSX1-LED Il�lllllllluuVu�;;ullmmmull ��uull,��,uui Y ulllll uIIIIVIIiiull' uIIIIIuIIIII piIIIIIIYuuuuIIIIIIIIIII611111N" Vuo° uu IlVuuuuuuo°IIIV" IIVu ui Vuuuu,Vuuuu,uuu c 0 - Inc.All Rev. 12/18/18 mullll muppll�uu,,,uuppl °°YB, pull uppll,,uppll �,; O 2 11 2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, nc A rights reserved. Page 4 of 8 Il»»�� NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN,� Lumen Output Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. III I I I I r 11 I I I III r �I I II a I &I I I I p 11� Illl �� IIII I II 1 I P II I � I rvn U , W a P a II Uo, pl Illul II III IIII Ul //� III VIII II 11 U» IU � 1 II VIII II 111 U» II » I i II 1 6P 1 I I I ��II�I ��I �� I�� II��IIIIII �� I �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPIIJIhlllllll oJVIIIIIPI IIIIII �Illllt��i. IIUIIIIIP�i'r� Illllll��llllllll�mll�ll� 11111114�PI�IIIhIIIV�IIIIIIIIIIoJl�lll�ll 1111111 �i. IIIIII11�iii �� IIIIIII��I IIIIIIIIIIIY�IIIiIdPll�l� IIIIP111PII�IIIIIIIIIhllllll��llhul Illllld Illllll��iii �� IIIIIIIII�II�� 1111111111Yi'��Ill�llul�l�l� T1 S 6,457 2 0 2 120 6,956 2 0 2 129 7,044 2 0 2 130 IIIVuIIII' uul ,IIIIIuuuuulllllllRRll IIIVulllllllllll°VIIIIk6"' IIII ulll puull DSX1-LED ulllll111111 uIIIIV Illliilll Ilm1 lll "'lllllllllllllllll uuu uuIIIIIIIIVu Illpllll One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 v vvvv. l:llc ulu uppppuill'"Ipiil""9kP°°ylilllllllllllll"„IIVi'I°IlllllllplIII,,I,uilllllll;l,ulllllllllllil © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 12/18/18 ullll m Page 5 of 8 T2S 6,450 2 0 2 119 6,949 2 0 2 129 7,037 20 2 130 T2M 6,483 1 0 1 120 6,984 2 0 2 129 7,073 2 0 2 131 T3S 6,279 2 0 2 116 6,764 2 0 2 125 6,850 2 0 2 127 T3M 6,468 1 0 2 120 6,967 1 0 2 129 7,056 1 0 2 131 TV 6,327 1 0 2 117 6,816 1 0 2 126 6,902 1 0 2 128 TFTM 6,464 1 0 2 120 6,963 1 0 2 129 7,051 1 0 2 131 30 530 P1 54W T5VS 6,722 2 0 0 124 7,242 3 0 0 134 7,334 30 0 136 T5S 6,728 2 0 1 125 7,248 2 0 1 134 7,340 2 0 1 136 T5M 6,711 3 0 1 124 7,229 3 0 1 134 7,321 3 0 2 136 T5W 6,667 3 0 2 123 7,182 3 0 2 133 7,273 3 0 2 135 BLC 5,299 1 0 1 98 5,709 1 0 2 106 5,781 1 0 2 107 LCCO 3,943 1 0 2 73 4,248 1 0 2 79 4,302 1 0 2 80 RCCO 3,943 1 0 2 73 4,248 1 0 2 79 .... 4,302 1 0 2 80 ..... T1 S.... 8,249 2.. 0 2.... 118 8,886 2 0 2... 127 8,999 2 0 2 129 US 8,240 2 0 2.... 118 8,877 2 0 2 127 8,989 2 0 2 128 T2M 8,283 2 0 2.... 118 8,923 2 0 2 127 9,036 2 0 2 129 T3S 8,021 2 0 2 115 8,641 2 0 2 123 8,751 2 0 2 125 T3M 8,263 2 0 2 118 8,901 2 0 2 127 9,014 2 0 2 129 TV 8,083 2 0 2 115 8,708 2 0 2 124 8,818 2 0 2 126 TFTM 8,257 2 0 2 118 8,896 2 0 2 127 9,008 2 0 2 129 30 700 P2 70W T5VS 8,588 3 0 0 123 9,252 3 0 0 132 9,369 30 0 134 T5S 8,595 3 0 1 123 9,259 3 0 1 132 9,376 3 0 1 134 T5M 8,573 3 0 2 122 9,236 3 0 2 132 9,353 3 0 2 134 T5W 8,517 3 0 2 122 9,175 4 0 2 131 9,291 40 2 133 BLC 6,770 1 0 2 97 7,293 1 0 2 104 7,386 1 0 2 106 LCCO 5,038 1 0 2 72 5,427 1 0 2 78 5,496 1 0 2 79 RCCO 5,038 1 0 2 72 5,427 1 0 2 78 .... 5,496 .... 1 0 2 79 ..... T1 S.... 11,661 2. 0 2.... 114 12,562 3 0 3... 123 12,721 3 0 3. 125 T2S 11,648 2 0 2 114 12,548 3 0 3 123 12,707 3 0 3 125 T2M 11,708 2 0 2 115 12,613 2 0 2 124 12,773 2 0 2 125 T3S 11,339 2 0 2 111 12,215 3 0 3 120 12,370 3 0 3 121 T3M 11,680 2 0 2 115 12,582 2 0 2 123 12,742 2 0 2 125 T4M 11,426 2 0 3 112 12,309 2 0 3 121 12,465 2 0 3 122 TFTM 11,673 2 0 2 114 12,575 2 0 3 123 12,734 2 0 3 125 30 1050 P3 102W T5VS 12,140 3 0 1 119 13,078 3 0 1 128 13,244 30 1 130 T5S 12,150 3 0 1 119 13,089 3 0 1 128 13,254 3 0 1 130 T5M 12,119 4 0 2 119 13,056 4 0 2 128 13,221 40 2 130 T5W 12,040 4 0 3 118 12,970 4 0 3 127 13,134 4 0 3 129 BLC 9,570 1 0 2 94 10,310 1 0 2 101 10,440 1 0 2 102 LCCO 7,121 1 0 3 70 7,671 1 0 3 75 7,768 1 0 3 76 RCCO 7,121 1 0 3 70 7,671 1 0 3 75 .... 7,768 .... 1 0 3 76 ..... T1 S.... 13,435 3. 0 3.... 107 14,473 3 0 3... 116 14,657 3 0 3 117 US 13,421 3 0 3 107 14,458 3 0 3 116 14,641 3 0 3 117 T2M 13,490 2 0 2 108 14,532 3 0 3 116 14,716 3 0 3 118 US 13,064 3 0 3 105 14,074 3 0 3 113 14,252 3 0 3 114 T3M 13,457 2 0 2 108 14,497 2 0 2 116 14,681 2 0 2 117 T4M 13,165 2 0 3 105 14,182 2 0 3 113 14,362 2 0 3 115 30 1250 P4 125W TFTM 13,449 2 0 3 108 14,488 2 0 3 116 14,672 2 0 3 117 T5VS 13,987 4 0 1 112 15,068 4 0 1 121 15,259 40 1 122 T5S 13,999 3 0 1 112 15,080 3 0 1 121 15,271 3 0 1 122 T5M 13,963 4 0 2112 15,042 4 0 2 120 15,233 4 0 2 122 TA 13,872 4 0 3.... 111 14,944 4 0 3.. 120 15,133 40 3 121 BLC 11,027 1 0 2 88 11,879 1 0 2 95 12,029 1 0 2 96 LCCO 8,205 1 0 3 66 8,839 1 0 3 71 8,951 1 0 3 72 RCCO 8,205 1 0 3 66 8,839 1 0 3 71 .... 8,951 .... 1 0 3 72 ..... T1 S.... 14,679 3. 0 3.... 106 15,814 3 0 3... 115 16,014 3 0 3 116 T2S 14,664 3 0 3 106 15,797 3 0 3 114 15,997 3 0 3 116 T2M 14,739 3 0 3 107 15,878 3 0 3 115 16,079 3 0 3 117 T3S 14,274 3 0 3 103 15,377 3 0 3 111 15,572 3 0 3 113 T3M 14,704 2 0 3 107 15,840 3 0 3 115 16,040 3 0 3 116 T4M 14,384 2 0 3 104 15,496 3 0 3 112 15,692 3 0 3 114 30 1400 P5 138W TFTM 14,695 2 0 3 106 15,830 3 0 3 115 16,030 3 0 3 116 T5VS 15,283 4 0 1 111 16,464 4 0 1 119 16,672 40 1 121 T5S 15,295 3 0 1 111 16,477 4 0 1 119 16,686 4 0 1 121 T5M 15,257 4 0 2 111 16,435 4 0 2 119 16,644 4 0 2 121 T5W 15,157 4 0 3 110 16,328 4 0 3 118 16,534 4 0 3 120 BLC 12,048 1 0 2 87 12,979 1 0 2 94 13,143 1 0 2 95 LCCO 8,965 1 0 3 65 9,657 1 0 3 70 9,780 1 0 3 71 RCCO 8,965 1 0 3 65 9,657 1 0 3 70 9,780 1 0 3 71 IIIVuIIII' uul ,IIIIIuuuuulllllllRRll IIIVulllllllllll°VIIIIk6"' IIII ulll puull DSX1-LED ulllll111111 uIIIIV Illliilll Ilm1 lll "'lllllllllllllllll uuu uuIIIIIIIIVu Illpllll One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 v vvvv. l:llc ulu uppppuill'"Ipiil""9kP°°ylilllllllllllll"„IIVi'I°IlllllllplIII,,I,uilllllll;l,ulllllllllllil © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 12/18/18 ullll m Page 5 of 8 IIIIII» NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN,� lip 0 % Lumen Output Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. u� IIIIIII . li �� ILII i I rcII»IIpII,oI uIImI III LII �I o 1IJIIk�I L L r / I IL IryII III ILeI I III IIIIYI II III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III II IIjI I III(IIIIIIIryIIII III II IIII III ��. IIJI IIaII IIIwI IIII IIII ' �I 41 I(IM, I �� ,� VIIIlIi,., I �IJ I�I III IIII 4IIIjUIjI +ISpI'I U vi I',, I ',, IIIlI uII I . II 4V1fIf» �J� �� .0 IfII+I IIry/u/p/+/�/ , I'hIrI I, II 4I1I1IfIIfI 1 1�AA lIi, ��I I0 IIIIII/II�/ I,JI�I�IJI�IIII "IpiII IIIIII» �I IIIIIIIII ! II 4I11I1IfIIfI ! i3 c�I T1S 7,654 f 3 0 3 108 19,018 3 0 3 117 19,259 3IIIII 18 T2S 17,635 3 0 3 108 18,998 3 0 3 117 19,238 30 3 118 T2M 17,726 3 0 3 109 19,096 3 0 3 117 19,337 3 0 3 119 T3S 17,167 3 0 3 105 18,493 3 0 3 113 18,727 3 0 3 115 T3M 17,683 3 0 3 108 19,049 3 0 3 117 19,290 3 0 3 118 T4M 17,299 3 0 3 106 18,635 3 0 4 114 18,871 3 0 4 116 40 1250 P6 163W TFTM 17,672 3 0 3 108 19,038 3 0 4 117 19,279 3 0 4 118 TSVS 18,379 4 0 1 113 19,800 4 0 1 121 20,050 4 0 1 123 T5S 18,394 4 0 2 113 19,816 4 0 2 122 20,066 4 0 2 123 T5M 18,348 4 0 2 113 19,766 4 0 2 121 20,016 40 2 123 T5W 18,228 5 0 3 112 19,636 5 0 3 120 19,885 5 0 3 122 BLC 14,489 2 0 2 89 15,609 2 0 3 96 15,806 2 0 3 97 LCCO 10,781 1 0 3 66 11,614 1 0 3 71 11,761 2 0 3 72 RCCO 10,781 1 0 3 66 11,614 1 0 3 71 .... 11,761 .... 2 0 3 72 ..... T15.... 19,227 3. 0 3.... 105 20,712 3 0 3... 113 20,975 3 0 3 115 T2S 19,206 3 0 3 105 20,690 3 0 3 113 20,952 3 0 3 114 T2M 19,305 3 0 3 105 20,797 3 0 3 114 21,060 3 0 3 115 US 18,696 3 0 3 102 20,141 3 0 3 110 20,396 3 0 4 111 T3M 19,258 3 0 3 105 20,746 3 0 3 113 21,009 3 0 3 115 TV 18,840 3 0 4 103 20,296 3 0 4 111 20,553 3 0 4 112 40 1400 P7 183W TFTM 19,246 3 0 4 105 20,734 3 0 4 113 20,996 3 0 4 115 TSVS 20,017 4 0 1 109 21,564 4 0 1 118 21,837 4 0 1 119 T5S 20,033 4 0 2 109 21,581 4 0 2 118 21,854 40 2 119 T5M 19,983 4 0 2 109 21,527 5 0 3 118 21,799 5 0 3 119 T5W 19,852 5 0 3 108 21,386 5 0 3 117 21,656 5 0 3 118 BLC 15,780 2 0 3 86 16,999 2 0 3 93 17,214 2 0 3 94 LOCO 11,742 2 0 3.... 64 12,649 2 0 3 69 12,809 2 0 3 70 RCCO 11,742 2 0 3 64 12,649 2 0 3 69 .... 12,809 .... 2 0 3 70 ..... T15.... 22,490 3.. 0 3.... 109 24,228 3 0 3... 117 24,535 3 0 3 119 T2S 22,466 3 0 4 109 24,202 3 0 4 117 24,509 3 0 4 118 T2M 22,582 3 0 3 109 24,327 3 0 3 118 24,635 3 0 3 119 T3S 21,870 3 0 4 106 23,560 3 0 4 114 23,858 3 0 4 115 T3M 22,527 3 0 4 109 24,268 3 0 4 117 24,575 3 0 4 119 TV 22,038 3 0 4 106 23,741 3 0 4 115 24,041 3 0 4 116 60 1050 P8 207W TFTM 22,513 3 0 4 109 24,253 3 0 4 117 24,560 3 0 4 119 TSVS 23,415 5 0 1 113 25,224 5 0 1 122 25,543 50 1 123 T5S 23,434 4 0 2 113 25,244 4 0 2 122 25,564 4 0 2 123 T5M 23,374 5 0 3 113 25,181 5 0 3 122 25,499 5 0 3 123 T5W 23,221 5 0 4 112 25,016 5 0 4 121 25,332 5 0 4 122 BLC 18,458 2 0 3 89 19,885 2 0 3 96 20,136 2 0 3 97 LCCO 13,735 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 RCCO 13,735 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 .... 14,983 .... 2 0 4 72 ..... T15.... 25,575 3. 0 3.... 106 27,551 3 0 3... 114 27,900 3 0 3 116 T2S 25,548 3 0 4 106 27,522 3 0 4 114 27,871 3 0 4 116 T2M 25,680 3 0 3 107 27,664 3 0 3 115 28,014 3 0 3 116 T3S 24,870 3 0 4 103 26,791 3 0 4 111 27,130 3 0 4 113 T3M 25,617 3 0 4 106 27,597 3 0 4 115 27,946 3 0 4 116 TV 25,061 3 0 4 104 26,997 3 0 4 112 27,339 3 0 4 113 60 1250 P9 241W TFTM 25,602 3 0 4 106 27,580 3 0 4 114 27,929 3 0 4 116 TSVS 26,626 5 0 1 110 28,684 5 0 1 119 29,047 50 1 121 T5S 26,648 4 0 2 111 28,707 5 0 2 119 29,070 5 0 2 121 T5M 26,581 5 0 3 110 28,635 5 0 3 119 28,997 5 0 3 120 T5W 26,406 5 0 4 110 28,447 5 0 4 118 28,807 5 0 4 120 BLC 20,990 2 0 3 87 22,612 2 0 3 94 22,898 2 0 3 95 LCCO 15,619 2 0 4 65 16,825 2 0 4 70 17,038 2 0 4 71 RCC0 15,619 2 0 ] 4.. 65 16,825 2 0 4.. 70 17,038 2 0 4 71 pluul° Illllplul° IIIIIIIIIVu,lllllllllll°plllll" pVuul pll„IIIIIIIIIIIII^Illllllp° W1°°I'llVllllll°°uuuuIIIIIIRIPIDSX1- LE D One Lithonia Way e Conyers Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • vvvvw.lIll"Io 1 "J" C)IIT7 Iluu Iluulllllllllll a Iluulllllllllllll"uu Illllllli I� a°�lllllllllomlll°° pu Iluulllll�°m plllllllllllllllll Rev. 12/18/18 VIII VII"'.IIIIII„Pppllllll"'Ill IVIi"'""'IIjIIIVi VII d 0 © 2011-218 Acuity Brans Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. I ul,luullVl � luull Im luull luullll IuullVllll �,; ulllllllllllll Pa e6of8 g i»»»�� NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN,� 1111111J��: , »n Imn,�, "r I�I UYD p�lllol�. Lumen Output Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. III u� IIII li 11 VIII 111111 i1 I II i JIIIjI � I I I �� r I 7 I L I , III II , IryII III I IIIIII I IIII II III IIII IIIIYYIIII»IIIIIjI VII II II � III IIIIIII 11I111I 1 �� VIII IIIIIII II IJLIJI IIII IIII IIII VIII ',. ,11 4,I1I1IfI,IfI r�,rfIU1,Ir/ � I,', u, ,II,I,e � 111u1 ,Il,i.� ',, �,IWII,/I ', 1111 I» � i �u�' 11111 » »,» IU , , ,N,�,I �I��II/I�IUIp+I/�/ an hj'. ,4I,1I1IfIIfII1 I,�,� 11111 1 », 4I1fJI »» IIII I ,6d »34 T1 S 13,042 �f 3 0 3 123 14,050 3 0 3 133 14,228 �f 3 0 3 1 T2S 12,967 4 0 4 122 13,969 4 0 4 132 14,146 40 4 133 T2M 13,201 3 0 3 125 14,221 3 0 3 134 14,401 3 0 3 136 T3S 12,766 4 0 4 120 13,752 4 0 4 130 13,926 4 0 4 131 T3M 13,193 4 0 4 124 14,213 4 0 4 134 14,393 4 0 4 136 T4M 12,944 4 0 4 122 13,945 4 0 4 132 14,121 4 0 4 133 60 530 P10 106W TFTM 13,279 4 0 4 125 14,305 4 0 4 135 14,486 4 0 4 137 TSVS 13,372 3 0 1 126 14,405 4 0 1 136 14,588 40 1 138 T5S 13,260 3 0 1 125 14,284 3 0 1 135 14,465 3 0 1 136 T5M 13,256 4 0 2 125 14,281 4 0 2 135 14,462 40 2 136 T5W 13,137 4 0 3 124 14,153 4 0 3 134 14,332 4 0 3 135 BLC 10,906 3 0 3 103 11,749 3 0 3 111 11,898 3 0 3 112 LCCO 7,789 1 0 3 73 8,391 1 0 3 79 8,497 1 0 3 80 RCCO 7,779 4 0 4 73 8,380 4 0 4 79 .... 8,486 .... 4 0 4 80 ..... T15.... 16,556 3. 0 3.... 121 17,835 3 0 3... 130 18,061 4 0 4 132 US 16,461 4 0 4 120 17,733 4 0 4 129 17,957 4 0 4 131 T2M 16,758 4 0 4 122 18,053 4 0 4 132 18,281 4 0 4 133 US 16,205 4 0 4 118 17,457 4 0 4 127 17,678 4 0 4 129 T3M 16,748 4 0 4 122 18,042 4 0 4 132 18,271 4 0 4 133 TV 16,432 4 0 4 120 17,702 4 0 4 129 17,926 4 0 4 131 60 700 P11 137W TFTM 16,857 4 0 4 123 18,159 4 0 4 133 18,389 4 0 4 134 TSVS 16,975 4 0 1 124 18,287 4 0 1 133 18,518 4 0 1 135 T5S 16,832 4 0 1 123 18,133 4 0 2 132 18,362 4 0 2 134 T5M 16,828 4 0 2 123 18,128 4 0 2 132 18,358 40 2 134 T5W 16,677 4 0 3 122 17,966 5 0 3 131 18,193 5 0 3 133 BLC 13,845 3 0 3 101 14,915 3 0 3 109 15,103 3 0 3 110 LCCO 9,888 1 0 3 72 10,652 2 0 3 78 10,787 2 0 3 79 RCCO9,875 4 0 4 72 10,638 4 0 4 78 .... 10,773 .... 4 0 4 79 T1 S.... 22,996 4 0 4.... 111 24,773 4 0 4.. 120 25,087 40 4 121 US 22,864 4 0 4 110 24,631 5 0 5 119 24,943 5 0 5 120 T2M 23,277 4 0 4 112 25,075 4 0 4 121 25,393 40 4 123 T3S 22,509 4 0 4 109 24,248 5 0 5 117 24,555 5 0 5 119 T3M 23,263 4 0 4 112 25,061 4 0 4 121 25,378 40 4 123 T4M 22,824 5 0 5 110 24,588 5 0 5 119 24,899 5 0 5 120 60 1050 P12 207W TFTM 23,414 5 0 5 113 25,223 5 0 5 122 25,543 5 0 5 123 TSVS 23,579 5 0 1 114 25,401 5 0 1 123 25,722 50 1 124 T5S 23,380 4 0 2 113 25,187 4 0 2 122 25,506 4 0 2 123 T5M 23,374 5 0 3 113 25,181 5 0 3 122 25,499 5 0 3 123 T5W 23,165 5 0 4 112 24,955 5 0 4 121 25,271 5 0 4 122 BLC 19,231 4 0 4 93 20,717 4 0 4 100 20,979 4 0 4 101 LCCO 13,734 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 RCCO 13,716 4 0 4 66 14,776 4 0 4 71 .... 14,963 .... 4 0 4 72 ..... TIS.... 25,400 4 0 4.... 110 27,363 4 0 4.. 118 27,709 4 0 4 120 T2S 25,254 5 0 5 109 27,205 5 0 5 118 27,550 5 0 5 119 T2M 25,710 4 0 4 111 27,696 4 0 4 120 28,047 4 0 4 121 T3S 24,862 5 0 5 108 26,783 5 0 5 116 27,122 5 0 5 117 T3M 25,695 5 0 5 111 27,680 5 0 5 120 28,031 5 0 5 121 TV 25,210 5 0 5 109 27,158 5 0 5 118 27,502 5 0 5 119 60 1250 P13 231W TFTM 25,861 5 0 5 112 27,860 5 0 5 121 28,212 5 0 5 122 TSVS 26,043 5 0 1 113 28,056 5 0 1 121 28,411 50 1 123 T5S 25,824 4 0 2 112 27,819 5 0 2 120 28,172 5 0 2 122 T5M 25,818 5 0 3 112 27,813 5 0 3 120 28,165 5 0 3 122 T5W 25,586 5 0 4 111 27,563 5 0 4 119 27,912 5 0 4 121 BLC 21,241 4 0 4 92 22,882 4 0 4 99 23,172 40 4 100 LCCO 15,170 2 0 4 66 16,342 2 0 4 71 16,549 2 0 4 72 RCC0 15,150 5 0 5 66 16,321 5 0 5.. 71 16,527 .. 5 ] .. 0 5 E .. 72 ...V Illlluul°°°. ,11111uuumilllllllRR1 u1111'IIIp,11111111111°VIIIA"""' 1111 puull' DSX1-LED mllllll 1111111 uIIIIV 111uilll Ilm 1 111 11'llllll j uuu uuppppVi' Ilullplll1 One Lit h o n i a Way • Co nye rs, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 v vvvv. l:l c Mui uppppuill'"Ipu111"9111°°lyulllllllllllll"„1111I1u1°11'111111IIIII°111,,1,uilllllll;l,ulllllllllllu © 2011-2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 12/18/18 ullll m Page 7 of 8 iu Luminaire This item is an A+ capable luminaire, which has been designed and tested to provide consistent color appearance and system -level interoperability. • All configurations of this luminaire meet the Acuity Brands' specification for chromatic consistency • This luminaire is A+ Certified when ordered with DTL° controls marked by a shaded background. DTL DLL equipped luminaires meet the A+ specification for luminaire to photocontrol interoperability1 • This luminaire is part of an A+ Certified solution for ROAM° or XPointTM Wireless control networks, providing out-of-the-box control compatibility with simple commissioning, when ordered with drivers and control options marked by a shaded background' To learn more about A+, visit www.acu-itybrands.com/apius. 1. See ordering tree for details. 2. A+ Certified Solutions for ROAM require the order of one ROAM node per luminaire. Sold Separately: II 1I i IIS: II11. II II ry II 11 II II;, II IL. FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The sleek design of the D -Series Size 1 reflects the embedded high performance LED technology. It is ideal for many commercial and municipal applications, such as parking lots, plazas, campuses, and streetscapes. CONSTRUCTION Single -piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance and future light engine upgrades. The LED drivers are mounted in direct contact with the casting to promote low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). Low EPA (1.01 ft2) for optimized pole wind loading. FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc -infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering A tightly controlled multi -stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in both textured and non -textured finishes. OPTICS Precision -molded proprietary acrylic lenses are engineered for superior area lighting distribution, uniformity, and pole spacing. Light engines are available in standard 3000 K, 4000 K and 5000 K (70 CRI) configurations. The D -Series Size 1 has zero uplight and qualifies as a Nighttime FriendlyT"' product, meaning it is consistent with the LEED° and Green GlobesT"' criteria for eliminating wasteful uplight. ELECTRICAL Light engine configurations consist of high -efficacy LEDs mounted to metal - core circuit boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (up to L85/100,000 hours at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers are designed to have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and an expected life of 100,000 hours with <1 % failure rate. Easily serviceable 10kV surge protection device meets a minimum Category C Low operation (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). STANDARD CONTROLS The DSX1 LED area luminaire has a number of control options. Dusk to dawn controls can be utilized via optional NEMA twist -lock photocell receptacles. Integrated motion sensors with on -board photocells feature field -adjustable programing and are suitable for mounting heights up to 30 feet. nLIGHT AIR CONTROLS The DSX1 LED area luminaire is also available with nLight® AIR for the ultimate in wireless control. This powerful controls platform provides out-of-the-box basic motion sensing and photocontrol functionality and is suitable for mounting heights up to 40 feet. Once commissioned using a smartphone and the easy-to-use CLAIRITY app, nLight AIR equipped luminaries can be grouped, resulting in motion sensor and photocell group response without the need for additional equipment. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over -ride can be achieved when used with the nLight Eclypse. Additional information about nLight Air can be found here. INSTALLATION Included mounting block and integral arm facilitate quick and easy installation. Stainless steel bolts fasten the mounting block securely to poles and walls, enabling the D -Series Size 1 to withstand up to a 3.0 G vibration load rating per ANSI C136.31. The D -Series Size 1 utilizes the AERIST"' series pole drilling pattern (template #8). NEMA photocontrol receptacle are also available. LISTINGS UL Listed for wet locations. Light engines are IP66 rated; luminaire is IP65 rated. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. U.S. Patent No. D672,492 S. International patent pending. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) Premium qualified product and DLC qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC Premium qualified or DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at vAAA i(w,"1 "1 �S, to confirm which versions are qualified. International Dark -Sky Association (IDA) Fixture Seal of Approval (FSA) is available for all products on this page utilizing 3000K color temperature only. WARRANTY 5 -year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: V` VV \N P 4 (...1 �i o ri i e I eb m,,.,I C. E. w, S/ ' 171 k , Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. !!;u°""""""" "plllllui °""pIIIV°""',,,iillllllllll One Lithonia Wa •Con ers Georgia 30012 •Phone: 800.279.8041 `, rrvv Ii l I"'"), 011`1 DSX1-LED Y mul uuul uul. mmi Y 9 ulll ullllluullll iIIIIIIIIiVuullluilllliillYuuuullljplll6lll"° 011111''1111 11111111111111111111111111111 uuuuu^IIVui^VIII pu Ippumiiuuuu°°°°" C _ Inc. Rev. 12/18/18 �uppll�Ipui,,,ullllll H uuIIl��uupVIll��mulVlll �u;,,r,� O 2011 2018 Acuity Brands Lighting, nc A rights reserved. ullll Page 8of8 IRLIN Since 1895 CATALOG # TYPE JOB NAME VO LTAG E Super Shallow 23/4" Depth Downlight *LED Up to 60,,000 Hour Life e Wet Location e Open Appearance 10% Dimmingo MFL e 5 CCT 9 3 -Step Binning LM -80 Qualified 9 LM -79 Certified Spe6l,ficatbns Ilii it System lPeirfoirimaince* • Lumen Series: MUST SPECIFY -250OL: 2500 nominal lumens (35W). • Distribution: MFL standard. • Color temperature: 3500°K standard. Optional: -27K, -30K, -41 K or -50K. • CRI: 80+ standard. Optional: -HC (90+). • 60,000 hour life (L70). • Fully sustainable: removable for servicing. Theirimall Piro-tection: SIPIECIIIFYVOILTAGIE • Thermal protector for insulation detection per UL/NEC. Must specify input voltage. TheirimaIII Mainageimen-t Sys-teinn • All aluminum heat sink, components and housing maximize cool operation and long life while minimizing maintenance. LED lPoweir Supply- III 'III • Suitable for outdoor / indoor use: -30°C (-22°F) to 60°C (140°F). e 120-277V / 50-60Hz standard. Load insensitive. 0 0 . .... 1110V staindairdii, J''11( X1 110 0111111111'111') Tidinn AsseinnIbIly • Seamless tapered aluminum self -flanged trim with white finish (field paintable). 3.25" top aperture. • Regressed tempered prismatic spread lens. it II lEinaimelled Alluimiii uinn Housling: Sulpeir Shalillow 23/4" Delpth • Rustproof and corrosion resistant: Exceeds 1000 hour ASTM 5% salt spray test. • Shallow depth fits restricted plenums. • Cool operation: Extends life of all components. • Entire luminaire, including LED light engine, is modular, easily visible and serviced through aperture. • Built-in plaster flange. Outlet lBox • UL listed J -box with insulated removable cover. Prewired 14 GA (NEC) with '/2" and 3/4 ly knockouts. LRR-05438-2500L lins-tallia-hoin * Recess indoor or outdoor. * Accommodates ceilings up to 1-1/8" thick. e Compatible with fire rated enclosures (by others). 0 27" galvanized hanger bars with adjustable mounting brackets (2) supplied. UIL, Iiis-fings • Wet, damp or dry locations, covered ceilings. • Through -branch conductors (4 #12 AWG 900C). 11EC & IFCC Coirnpliliaince • Meets IEC/EN 60601-1-2 electromagnetic compatibility standard for medical electrical equipment. • FCC Part 15 certified for EMI/RFI emissions. RIVIE YEAR Liinnli-ted it ,t Vea,r 9 Complete standard fixture. MUST SPECIFY OPTIONAL 0irdeirling Example: Product Number Voltage Options -120 (1 20 volts) 1-113113-05438-250011- -277 (277 Volts) See "Options" (bellow LRR-05438-250OL-1 20-30K-45 -97 (Specify otheir) Input Poweir: SIPIECIIIFY -120 120V (50-60Hz) input for thermal protector. -277 277V (50-60Hz) input for thermal protector. -97 Specify other voltage. Consult factory. LED lPoweir Supply -29 Two wire full range (100-1 %) PWM dimming instead (Lutron). Consult factory. 120V only. Requires 5" deep housing, including plaster flange depth. -D1 0-10V 1.0% dimming instead. -ECO Digital driver for Lutron EcoSystem controls. Dims to 1 % or consult factory. -ERH REMOTE emergency battery pack. Delivers 1000 lumens. Run time: 90+ minutes. CEC Compliant. Colloir'Teimlpeiratu it (CM) -27K Color temperature 2700°K instead. -30K Color temperature 3000°K instead. -41 K Color temperature 4100°K instead. -50K Color temperature 5000°K instead. -HC 90+ CRI instead. Consult factory. Lens and'Tidim -23 Frosted microprismatic lens instead. -31 White acrylic enameled trim flange. Available only with Option -35T -32 White oversize trim ring. Specify O.D. -35T Silver (natural aluminum) acrylic enameled trim. Also see Option -31. -45 Gasket between trim flange and ceiling. -62 Clear specular self -flanged trim. -94 Custom color/finish. Specify. Consult factory. -DF Electrically isolated "dead front" gasketed trim. Also requires Option -45. -WA White acrylic (flat) diffuser instead; will produce wide flood distribution. Otheir -79 Extension collar for ceilings up to 2" thick. -99 Special modification. Consult factory. -FS Single in-line fuse. -NAT Modified for natatorium use. The Kirlin Company LATITUDES RLIN3401 EAST JEFFERSON AVENUE e DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48207-4232 I Lighting Since 1895 (313) 259-6400 *Fax: (313) 259-3121 e www.kirlinlighting.com LED LIGHTING *See note next page DUE TO OUR CONTINUING EFFORT TO IMPROVE PRODUCTS, TECHNICAL INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. THE KIRLIN COMPANY EXPECTS PHOTOMETRIC PERFORMANCE TO IMPROVE SIGNIFICANTLY AND FREQUENTLY AS LED SOURCE TECHNOLOGY IMPROVES. C LRR-05438-2500L PERFORMANCE 31/4" [83mm] 53/4" [145mm] 7" [179mm] Ceiling Cut-out 6'/2" Dia. 23/4" [69mm] Detailed Photometry - Installed Fixture Photometric testing done in accordance with IESNA LM -79 -2500L Performance Lumens: 2753 i Beam: -37° �y SC: LPW: 0.7 75 �EE Efficiency: 74.1% 4422 ITL Test: 85871 3„ ID c Cone of Light A Dist. FC Dia. 6 126.1 4.1 8 70.9 5.4 10 45.4 6.8 12 31.5 8.1 14 23.2 9.5 16 17.7 10.8 Total System Watts 36.9 90° 75° 1500 it] 60° 3000 45° 4500 0° 15° 30° LM -80 Qualified • LM -79 Certified Photometry * LED manufacturers maintain a tolerance of ±7% on flux (lumens) and power (electrical) measurements. Kirlin photometrics are actual test data from Independent Testing Laboratories (ITL) where photometry was measured from 3717 lumen (-2500L) light engines (within the established tolerance). SUBMITTAL DATA JOB NAME TYPE VOLTAGE CATALOG NUMBER 1E [41 c IRLIN Since 1895 CDDJ DQ �Qz �( 5-t ESI (D3m O Photometry from I.T.L., Boulder, CO o CANDLEPOWER DISTRIBUTION S<lJ -�D 0 D O (D M cn5m opo 4539 4539 4539 4539 5 SCD �r— 4420 4422 �� z a 11 sq 3„ ID c G [302mm] o � m 3480 3348 '4v) 25 1389 f5 -m 1746 1657 o 3 35 500 531 `DD E3 z 598 o 5-t ESI (D3m O Photometry from I.T.L., Boulder, CO o CANDLEPOWER DISTRIBUTION 0.0 22.5 45.0 67.5 90.0 0 4539 4539 4539 4539 4539 5 4424 4420 4422 4405 4396 15 3166 3311 3480 3348 3173 25 1389 1529 1746 1657 1507 35 500 531 607 598 570 45 202 208 221 224 215 55 94 97 106 94 92 65 53 50 53 52 51 75 17 15 16 16 15 85 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 (D -3j CD �Q z 0 D ( �o O o �7 a� m �QDi 77 , D U r- o�71 �O �C� CD� zz!�cB X � C S� =-m D 2L 7�� ID IDav) o �o ago (D `m 0 O �C C �0 QQ= oom E� �BU) CD 0 Cpm 0CD Q� �o0 o�m n �_ Q-_ 9,-7; �7C3z �O ooD o < a �m �8 mom E ENS Cone of Light Key Ft. Distance from fixture `° (Dia. (in ft.) shown is where FC FC Footcandles at nadir (0°) —� value is half the FC at nadir. Dia. Circle of light at 50% of FC =� 9 Q� a. :� � CD �ID APPROVAL STAMP 5) �,. 01 CD o� ARRACD QUALIFIED NE �Q CD (D 73C-) �3= �M cD(D Q� o C. - (D r D �70 0-m G� mC c') CD� CD m o Cjm Cf)N o� CDa Or _Lm co C3 Prepared For: IN o aftl ��,I h r llllllu� M, ,S II This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed Maple Street Lofts mixed-use development to be located in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The site, which is currently occupied by a commuter permit parking lot, vacant industrial lot and an industrial building, is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maple Street with Prospect Avenue. As proposed, the site will be redeveloped with a six -story apartment building containing approximately 192 units, approximately 14,148 square -feet of ground floor retail space and a parking garage containing approximately 245 parking spaces, a seven -story apartment building containing approximatley 65 units and an approximately 65 -space parking garage, a three-story public parking garage containing approximately 268 parking spaces and 56 townhome units. Access to the development will be provided off Maple Street, Prospect Avenue and Lincoln Street. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The sections of this report present the following: Existing roadway conditions A description of the proposed development Directional distribution of the development traffic Vehicle trip generation for the development Future traffic conditions including access to the development Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours for the following conditions: 1. Existing Conditions - Analyze the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. 2. Projected Conditions — Analyze the capacity of the future roadway system using the projected traffic volumes that include the existing traffic volumes, ambient area growth not attributable to any particular development, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the full buildout of the proposed development. i5tt-il-?et Lo SALOPrAV �E Sr, E hum FY S""'t United Staless tl Rosta� Ser,p6ejce 9 �Rd ia(i�)NU Cerytrad Rd Cerrtra� Ri,�] II hift P ro ks P'e, ct C Pubibe Library MlAag,�!-c)f fro CUP E rfl e r, G a III e �S P'� I LIS r -t Pi, 1? H tit a r b k, xY (II IIIA MAm D it rnh; id," n d a! B a r�� k Hry 0 E Evelpeen Aw,,a of 1& 210 B LIS; S I? CEV sIV T en ury Idl alf1d JEA/afl Uie,,JTt,e! 11,1111V rll""I�'/,"")p/("�,,�,n"I '�,,"v'a , qp, ,C] Y [11 Q F" I id sl I oft) W' U n co In lit 1=111 1? no 23 M oil IN Site Location . .. ... .. . . . 4 ED r ice it Ie, 12 1 ��%r`v',,� b e i 4rie ,111r'-id,s ClUb Liiort,k",; R( creaitiai-'i, 111 r RE, PA IF Mon cc UernerTIary Sd,,iool rl"Y5 E G o g leIIIA Figure I Alk de Street Lo ' - dA"'4' Ill fs Arm Alm"11'a PI-Ovecty 111hubs /rim Aerial View of Site Location Figure 2 MC-111le Street Le,,)fts A,Pniti.tVe The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, proximity of the site to public transportation, the previously conducted Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study and existing peak hour traffic volumes. . . SiteLocati.on.. As previously indicated, the site is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maple Street with Prospect Avenue and currently contains a 280 -space commuter parking lot, a vacant industrial lot and an industrial building. The site is located approximately 1,300 feet southeast of the Mount Prospect Station for the Union Pacific North-West (UP -NW) Metra Commuter Railway and has a 150 foot walking distance from the front of the building to the inbound (eastbound) train platform. The Metra UP -NW Railway Line runs from Harvard to Chicago, Illinois and carries a total (inbound and outbound) of 65 passenger trains daily on weekdays, 24 on Saturdays, and 15 on Sundays. Furthermore, the site is located within close proximity to the following bus routes: Pace Suburban Bus Route 234 (Wheeling) — Provides weekday service from Des Plaines to Wheeling. Rush hour service operates between Des Plaines Metra Station and Pace Buffalo Grove Terminal and serves the following major destinations: Holy Family Hospital, Metra UP Northwest Line stations (Des Plaines, Cumberland and Mt. Prospect), Randhurst Mall, Wheeling H.S., Metra North Central Line station (Wheeling), Wheeling Municipal Complex and Wheeling Tower. • Pace Suburban Bus Route 694 (Central Road/Mt. Prospect Station) —Provides weekday rush hour service connecting Dana Point Condominiums and Central Park East and Village Apartment Complexes to the Mount Prospect Metra Station. This route also services Bosch Tool Corp. Pedestrian Accommodations. All of the streets in the immediate area have sidewalks on both sides of the street except for the north side of Prospect Avenue east of Maple Avenue and the south side of Lincoln Street between Maple Street and the access drive serving the Lions Recreation Center. High -visibility crosswalks are provided at the intersections of Maple Street with Lincoln Street and Lincoln Street with School Street and standard style crosswalks are provided at the intersection Maple Street with Prospect Avenue. Bike Accommodations. As stated in the October 2011 Mount Prospect Bicycle Plan, Emerson Street is a signed bicycle route that has a bicycle level of service of C. The proximity of the Mount Prospect UP -NW Train Station, the existing Pace bus routes and the existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities will provide an alternate mode of transportation to future residents of the site. Me',11,)1e,5treet Lovis 4 /rim I &A4'1\ Mount Prospect Downtown. Transportation. Study The Village of Mount Prospect commissioned a transportation study of the downtown area in 2018, the results of which are summarized in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study prepared by Sam Schwartz Consulting dated October 15, 2018. In this study, it was identified that congestion of traffic within the downtown area was primarily attributed to the at grade rail crossings at IL Route 83 and Emmerson Street which are regularly blocked by Metra commuter trains during the peak periods. When an inbound or outbound train is at the Mount Prospect Station, crossing gates are down at both intersections. Furthermore, traffic congestion was exacerbated by traffic signal preemption of emergency vehicles departing the Mount Prospect Police and Fire Station. This study also identified several area improvements to significantly improve the operations of the downtown area. These improvements ranged from short term improvements such as updating pedestrian facilities/signal equipment to long term infrastructure improvements such as new railroad crossings and relocation of the train station and platforms. Some of the identified improvements are as follows: Short Term Improvements: Installation of Directional Pedestrian Push Buttons at Signalized Intersections Relocation of the Mount Prospect Police and Fire Station Coordination with Metra Train Engineers Relocation of Permit Parking Spaces for Commuter Permit Parking Lot Long Term Improvements: New At -Grade Rail Crossing at Maple Street New Below -Grade Rail Crossing at School Street Installation of a Traffic Management Center Relocation of Train Platforms .. .. c Volumes The existing weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour traffic volumes identified in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study were utilized as a basis for this traffic impact study. The traffic counts were conducted in May 2017 and September 2018 and included the following intersections: • Prospect Avenue with Maple Street (May 2017) • Prospect Avenue with School Street (May 2017) • Maple Street with Lincoln Street (September 2018) • Maple Street with Commuter Parking Lot Access Drive (September 2018) • Lincoln Street with Commuter Parking Lot Access Drive (September 2018) The results of the traffic counts indicated that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:15 A.M. to 8:15 A.M. and the weekday evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 5:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Figure 1 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes. As can be seen from Figure 1, the existing commuter parking lot generates 170 inbound trips and 15 outbound trips during the weekday morning peak hour and zero inbound trips and 130 outbound trips during the weekday evening peak hour. ,ft ';µ o , 5 FIN 9Sr V --..l 60 � 9S� � /0 r 20� 0 LO Aq .� tC N O�Q LO LO s4?. LO -- LO v O 5 (15) 0 (60) LO 0 LO 0 O O CO.� N . Ln Q O LO 0 (15) -- -- 15 (25) `O `{' 15 (0) 4J0 (30) � � � �► 10 (25) 10 (15) mL 95 (0) 115 (15) 41 T (� 85 (20) --Oo- 5 (5) .... OLOo .� � LO� w J a a NOT TO SCALE J 2 V STREET LEGEND 00 - AM PEAK HOUR (7:15-8:15 AM) (00) - PM PEAK HOUR (5:00-6:00 PM) Maple Street Lofts ICA L Existina Traffic VolumesOA'4 MtProspect, Illinois v Kenig,Lindgren,0'Hara,Aboona,1nc. Job No: 18-249 Figure: 1 on In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Site and Development Plan. As proposed, the site will be redeveloped with the following: A six -story apartment building containing approximately 192 units, approximately 14,148 square -feet of ground floor retail space and a parking garage containing approximately 245 parking spaces. Access to the parking garage will be provided via a full movement access drive off Maple Street. This access drive will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane. Outbound movements should be under stop -sign control. A seven -story apartment building containing approximatley 65 units and an approximately 65 -space parking garage. Access to the parking garage will provided via two full movement access drives off of proposed Elm Street. Both access drives will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane. Outbound movements should be under stop -sign control. A three-story public parking garage containing approximately 268 parking spaces. Access to the parking garage will be provided via a full movement access drive off Maple Street. Secondary access to the parking garage will be provided via a full movement access drive off proposed Elm Street. Both access drives will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane. Outbound movements should be under stop -sign control. 56 townhome units consisting of 13 front load units and 43 rear load units. The front -loading units will provide a two -car garage and a driveway apron that can accommodate two additional vehicles and the rear -loading units will provide a two -car garage and a driveway apron that can accommodate one additional vehicle. Access to the townhome units will be provided off of proposed Elm Street. As part of the proposed development, two private roadways will be constructed. The proposed north -south roadway (Elm Street) will connect Prospect Avenue to Lincoln Street. At its intersections with Prospect Avenue and Lincoln Street, the Elm Street approaches should be under stop -sign control. The proposed east -west roadway (Dawson Drive) will connect Maple Street to proposed Elm Street and will bisect the site. At its unsignalized intersections with Maple Street and proposed Elm Street, the Dawson Drive approaches should be under stop -sign control. These private roadways will provide one lane in each direction and will primarily serve as access roadways to the townhome units and the seven -story apartment building. Additionally, in conjunction with the proposed development approximately 16 angled parking spaces will be provided on Maple Street, approximately 20 angled parking spaces will be provided on Prospect Avenue, 11 parallel parking spaces will be provided on the proposed Elm Street and 11 parallel parking spaces will be provide on the proposed Dawson Drive. Me',11,)1e,5tt-eet Lovis 7 ICA L I &A4'1\ Site Generated'Traffic Volumes The estimates of traffic to be generated by the development are based upon the proposed land use type and size. The volume of traffic generated for the transit -oriented development was estimated using data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. As previously indicated, the proposed development is located approximately 1,300 feet southeast of the Mount Prospect Station serving the UP -NW Metra Commuter Railway which qualifies it as a Transit Oriented Development (TOD). As such, many of the residents will utilize public transportation to get to work. Based on census data provided for households located within one- quarter mile of the Mount Prospect Metra Station, approximately 15 percent of residents utilize public transportation, bicycle or walking to travel to/from work. Therefore, the trips estimated to be generated by the proposed apartment units were conservatively reduced by 15 percent due to the proximity of public transportation. Furthermore, due to its location within downtown Mount Prospect, the number of trips generated by the proposed commercial space were reduced by 10 percent to take into consideration the interaction between the proposed and existing commercial space as well as the residential developments located to the south of downtown. Additionally, the site is currently occupied by a commuter permit parking lot. In conjunction with the proposed development 100 of the parking permit parking spaces will be relocated to the existing public parking garage located on the north side of the railway. The remaining 180 parking permits will be contained within the proposed 268 -space public parking garage. As such, approximately 40 inbound trips during the weekday morning peak hour and 45 outbound trips during the weekday evening peak hour will be removed from the area roadway network. Table 1 tabulates the vehicle trips anticipated for this development. n p Generatlon.Comparison. It should be noted that this parcel is currently zoned for I1 (Limited Industrial) and P 1 (Off -Street Parking). This zoning currently permits medical office, light industrial and retail uses such as grocery stores. The trip generation estimated to be generated by these other permitted uses was compared to the trip generation estimated to be generated by the proposed development. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation comparison. Table 1 PROJECTED SITE -GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Table 2 VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON OF LAND USES Maple,, Sftseet L(-,),fls Mown'. pt(,),pect,9 /rim Weekday.. Daily Peak Hour Peak Hour Two -Way Source Type/Size Traffic Allowable Use — Option 1 ITE Medical Office 70 20 34 90 1296 (720) 3600 s.f. Allowable Use — Option 2 ITE Light Industrial 17 3 2 15 180 (110) 321000 s.f. ITE Medical Offices 38 10 18 45 604 1 (720) 8,000 s. f. Total 55 13 20 60 784 Allowable Use — Option 3 ITE Grocery Store 92 6 1 2 1 0 1 93 41048 (850) 401000 s.f. Proposed Development Maple Street Lofts ITE 313 units 30 70 92 68 11928 (221/820) 14,148 s.f. retai 1 Maple,, Sftseet L(-,),fls Mown'. pt(,),pect,9 /rim The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject development. ..DevelopmentTra-.-.-f-.-.-Fi..c..Assi...m..en..t The directions from which residents, guests, patrons and employees will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. The estimated weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. Figure 2 illustrates the traffic assignment of the new passenger vehicle trips. As previously indicated, in conjunction with the proposed development 100 of the parking permit parking spaces will be relocated to the existing public parking garage located on the north side of the railway. As such, these trips were removed from the roadway network as illustrated in Figure 3. The net new trips (sum of Figure 2 and Figure 3) is illustrated in Figure 4. Total Projected Traffic Volumes The net new trips (Figures 4) were added to the existing traffic volumes to determine the total projected traffic volumes, shown in Figure 5. SALOPS i '. - psi , c t" 11 12 13 FIN M v C" 13 (6) 13 (33) 52 (20) --*-' 62 (19) C> LOco M NOT TO SCALE LEGEND - AM PEAK HOUR (7:15-8:15 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (5:00-6:00 PM) Maple Street Lofts Total Projected Traffic Volumes Mt Prospect, Illinois + Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,inc. Job No: 18-249 Figure: 5 14 The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning, weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or modification are required. I. raffi.c.Analyses Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were performed for the weekday morning, weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours for the existing and future projected traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 61h Edition and analyzed using the Synchro/SimTraffic 10 software. The analysis for the traffic -signal controlled intersections were accomplished using field measured cycle lengths and phasings to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service. The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing and Year 2025 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. i5tt-ill-,"et Lo sALOPrAV o,,/11 fflilufii� 15 Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS EXISTING CONDITIONS — UNSIGNALIZED Prospect Avenue with Maple Street • Northbound Approach A 9.9 B 10.3 • Westbound Left Turn A 7.6 A 7.5 Prospect Avenue with School Street • Northbound Approach A 9.4 A 9.5 • Westbound Left Turn A 7.5 A 7.5 Maple Street with Lincoln Street • Overall A 7.7 A 7.6 • Eastbound Approach A 8.0 A 7.5 • Westbound Approach A 7.4 A 7.6 • Northbound Approach A 7.3 A 7.4 • Southbound Approach A 7.5 A 7.7 Maple Street with Commuter Parking Lot Access Drive • Westbound Approach A 8.4 A 9.3 • Southbound Left Turn A 7.3 -- -- Lincoln Street with Commuter Parking Lot Access Drive Southbound Approach A 9.6 A 8.7 Eastbound Left Turn A 7.4 -- -- LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. Malple,, Street L(-,),fls '.m 16 I&A4' Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS PROJECTED CONDITIONS — UNSIGNALIZED Prospect Avenue with Maple Street • Northbound Approach B 10.1 B 11.1 • Westbound Left Turn A 7.6 A 7.6 Prospect Avenue with School Street • Northbound Approach A 9.6 A 9.8 • Westbound Left Turn A 7.5 A 7.5 Maple Street with Lincoln Street • Overall A 7.7 A 7.6 • Eastbound Approach A 8.0 A 7.6 • Westbound Approach A 7.4 A 7.5 • Northbound Approach A 7.5 A 7.4 • Southbound Approach A 7.5 A 7.7 Maple Street with Proposed Access Drives • Westbound Approach A 9.1 A 9.7 • Southbound Left Turn A 7.5 A 7.4 Lincoln Street with Proposed Access Drive • Southbound Approach A 8.9 A 8.8 • Eastbound Left Turn A 7.3 A 7.3 Prospect Avenue with Proposed Access Drive Northbound Approach A 9.6 A 9.8 Westbound Left Turn A 7.5 A 7.5 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. Malple,, Street L(-,),fls '.m 17 I&A4' . . . Discussi-on.. and-Recommendati.ons The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the intersections analyzed, and all of their approaches currently operate at the acceptable level of service (LOS) B or better during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour. Under projected conditions, the intersections and all of the approaches are projected to continue operating at the acceptable LOS B or better during the peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second and 95th percentile queues of one to two vehicles. Furthermore, the proposed access drives on Maple Street, Lincoln Street and Prospect Avenue are projected to operate identically to the existing access drives serving the commuter parking lot. Overall, the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operations of the study area intersections and no roadway or traffic control improvements will be required. IL Route 83 CorridorEvaluati on In addition to the intersections evaluated as part of the preceding traffic impact study, the intersections of IL Route 83 with Prospect Avenue and Illinois Route 83 with Northwest Highway (US Route 14) were also evaluated. The existing weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour traffic volumes that were identified in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study were also utilized for these intersections and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development was assigned to the intersections based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts, to project future conditions. Figure 6 illustrates the existing traffic volumes, the net increase in site traffic assignment, and the total projected traffic volumes for the two intersections. Capacity analyses were conducted for the intersections utilizing Synchro/SimTraffic 10 software using actual cycle lengths and phasings to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service. Table 5 summarizes the results of the capacity analyses for the intersection of IL Route 83 with Prospect Avenue and Table 6 summarizes the results of the capacity analyses for the intersection of IL Route 83 with Northwest Highway. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall the intersection of IL Route 83 with Prospect Avenue currently operates at LOS D during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. The intersection of IL Route 83 with Northwest Highway currently operates at LOS C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour. Under projected conditions, the intersections are projected to continue operating at existing levels of service during the peak hours with increases in delay of approximately one second or less. Furthermore, all of the approaches are projected to continue operating at existing levels of service with increases in delay of approximately three seconds or less. Overall, during the weekday morning peak hour, the traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development is projected to be less than one percent of the total traffic traversing the intersection of IL Route 83 with Prospect Avenue and less than one-half of a percent of the intersection of IL Route 83 with Northwest Highway. ,ft ;µ '; � 18 [J Table 5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS — EXISTING CONDITIONS — SIGNALIZED IL Route 83 with Prospect Avenue • Overall D 36.4 D 38.4 • Eastbound Approach E 58.8 E 61.5 • Westbound Approach E 78.3 E 76.7 • Northbound Approach E 64.3 E 66.0 • Southbound Approach A 2.8 A 1.9 IL Route 83 with Northwest Highway (US 14) Overall C 24.6 C 31.6 Eastbound Approach C 21.1 C 24.8 Westbound Approach D 41.8 D 49.7 Northbound Approach A 0.5 A 0.6 Southbound Approach D 43.0 D 51.4 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. Maple,, Sftseet L(-,),fls ,V gym, 20 /rim Table 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS PROJECTED CONDITIONS — SIGNALIZED IL Route 83 with Prospect Avenue • Overall D 37.4 D 38.7 • Eastbound Approach E 58.2 E 61.3 • Westbound Approach E 77.8 E 76.9 • Northbound Approach E 64.5 E 66.1 • Southbound Approach E 2.8 A 2.5 IL Route 83 with Northwest Highway (US 14) Overall C 25.0 C 33.0 Eastbound Approach C 22.7 C 25.5 Westbound Approach D 42.8 D 52.5 Northbound Approach A 0.6 A 0.6 Southbound Approach D 43.1 D 51.8 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. Maple, �ftseet L(,)fls AV During the weekday evening peak hour, the traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development is projected to be less than two percent of the total traffic traversing the intersection of IL Route 83 with Prospect Avenue and approximately one percent of the intersection of IL Route 83 with Northwest Highway. It should be noted that the results of the capacity analyses did not take into consideration the operations of the intersections during train events, emergency vehicle preemption, or when pedestrian phases are triggered. These operations are more reflected in a traffic simulation model which will show queueing and increased delay of vehicles during these events. However, as previously indicated the Village of Mount Prospect is considering several short-term and long- term area improvements to help enhance the flow of traffic along IL Route 83, particularly through these two intersections. As previously indicated, the findings of the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study identified that congestion of traffic within the downtown area was primarily attributed to the at grade rail crossings at IL Route 83 and Emmerson Street which are regularly blocked by Metra commuter trains during the peak periods. Furthermore, traffic congestion was exacerbated by traffic signal preemption of emergency vehicles departing the Mount Prospect Police and Fire Station. The study identified several key area improvements to significantly improve the operations of the downtown area. The more feasible improvements that can be completed in the short term to enhance the flow of traffic within the downtown area as follows: The intersections of IL Route 83 with Northwest Highway and Prospect Avenue currently have one pedestrian push button per corner. When pressed the pedestrian phase is called in both directions. Calling the pedestrian phase for both legs of the intersection may cause unnecessary green time allocation to an approach with no vehicles/pedestrians present. The installation of directional pedestrian push buttons at the intersections will reduce the number of false calls, allowing green time at the intersection to be allocated to approaches with higher traffic and pedestrian volumes. The Village has plans to relocate the existing Police and Fire Station located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Northwest Highway with Maple Street. The police and fire station currently generates an average of one traffic signal preemption call during each of the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours which interrupt the programmed operations of the traffic signals for approximately two minutes. The relocation of the Mount Prospect Police and Fire Station will eliminate the emergency preemption calls enhancing the flow of traffic and limit the amount of red time allocated to the approaches of the signalized intersections. ;µ 22 Arlm The Village has plans to coordinate with Metra to develop a new location for train engineers to stop the inbound trains at the station thus allowing the railroad gates at IL Route 83 to remain open (up position) an thus allowing, the continued flow of traffic. In doing so, it is estimated that the time train gates are down approximately 11 minutes during the 90 -minute morning rush period by and approximately four minutes during the 90 - minute evening rush period. It should be noted that relocating the stopping zone for inbound trains will require the extension of the southerly train platform. In conjunction with the proposed development, The Village plans on relocating approximately 100 of the existing commuter permit parking spaces from the proposed parking garage to the existing parking garage located adjacent to the Village Hall on the north side of Northwest Highway. The relocation of these permits will reduce the number of commuter vehicles in the area and will potentially reduce the number of commuters that cross the tracks at IL Route 83 or Emerson Street. The reduction in traffic will offset approximately thirty percent of the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development. Em.erson. Street Co�rr�..i..dor.Eval..uat.i..on.. Furthermore, the intersections of Emerson Street with Prospect Avenue and Emerson Street with Northwest Highway (US Route 14) were also evaluated. The existing weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour traffic volumes that were identified in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study were also utilized for these intersections and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development was assigned to the intersections based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts, to project future conditions. Figure 7 illustrates the existing traffic volumes, the net increase in site traffic assignment, and the total projected traffic volumes for the two intersections. Capacity analyses were conducted for the intersections utilizing Synchro/SimTraffic 10 software. Actual cycle lengths and phasings were utilized to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service at the intersection of Emerson Street with Northwest Highway. The analyses for the unsignalized intersection of Emerson Street with Prospect Avenue determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Table 7 summarizes the results of the capacity analyses for the intersection of Emerson Street with Prospect Avenue and Table 8 summarizes the results of the capacity analyses for the intersection of Emerson Street with Northwest Highway. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the eastbound and westbound approaches of Prospect Avenue at Emerson Street currently operate the acceptable LOS C or better during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. Additionally, the intersection of Emerson Street with Northwest Highway currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. .fir., c e ,�:��°� Lo/s ' 23 /rim I '� .. �. 24 Table 7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS — EXISTING CONDITIONS Emerson Street with Prospect Avenue • Eastbound Approach C 15.0 C 15.7 • Westbound Approach B 13.6 B 14.2 • Northbound Left Turn A 7.5 A 7.9 • Southbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 7.9 Emerson Street with Northwest Highway (US 14) Overall B 10.6 B 12.1 Eastbound Approach A 1.5 A 2.1 Westbound Approach A 7.8 A 8.8 Northbound Approach C 28.1 C 29.8 Southbound Approach C 27.5 C 30.4 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1 — Unsignalized Intersection 2 — Signalized Intersection Malple,, Sftseet L(-,),fls '.m 25 I&A4' Table 8 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS — PROJECTED CONDITIONS Emerson Street with Prospect Avenue • Eastbound Approach C 15.3 C 17.7 • Westbound Approach B 13.3 C 15.1 • Northbound Left Turn A 7.5 A 7.9 • Southbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 7.9 Emerson Street with Northwest Highway (US 14) Overall B 10.9 B 12.6 Eastbound Approach A 1.7 A 2.2 Westbound Approach A 8.4 A 9.2 Northbound Approach C 27.9 C 29.6 Southbound Approach C 26.2 C 30.3 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1 — Unsignalized Intersection 2 — Signalized Intersection Malple,, Sftseet L(-,),fls outi'm 26 I&A4' Under projected conditions, the eastbound and westbound Prospect Avenue approaches are projected to continue operating at LOS C or better during the peak hours with increases in delay of approximately two seconds or less. Furthermore, the intersection of Emerson Street with Northwest Highway is projected to continue operating at LOS B overall with increases in delay of less than one second. Additionally, all of the approaches are projected to operate at existing levels of service with increases in delay of less than one second. Overall, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development is projected to be less than five percent of the total traffic traversing the intersection of Emerson Street with Prospect Avenue during the weekday morning peak hour and approximately ten percent of the total traffic during the weekday evening peak hour. This translates into approximately one vehicle every two to three minutes and one vehicle every minute, respectively. Additionally, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development is projected to be approximately one-half of a percent of the total traffic traversing the intersection of Emerson Street with Northwest Highway during the weekday morning peak hour and approximately two percent of the total traffic during the weekday evening peak hour. This translates into approximately one vehicle every three cycles and one vehicle every one to two cycles, respectively. It should be noted that the results of the capacity analyses did not take into consideration the operations of the intersections during train events which cause increased queueing and delay along these approaches. However, as previously indicated the Village of Mount Prospect is considering several short-term and long-term area improvements to help enhance the flow of traffic within the downtown area including the intersections of Emerson Street with Prospect Avenue and Northwest Highway. Also, as shown previously, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development is projected to have a limited impact on the operations of these intersections and will not significantly increase the volume of traffic traversing the intersections. ,ft Am' µ 'lloi's, 27 Ar1W1&A4'*1h, Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been made: The volume of traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development will be reduced due to the proximity of the development to the Mount Prospect Metra Train Station, which qualifies the development as a TOD, and due to the interaction between the proposed development and existing uses within the area. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a minimal impact on the operations of the adjacent intersections. In conjunction with the proposed development, 100 of the existing commuter permit parking spaces will be relocated to the public parking garage located adjacent to Village Hall reducing the volume of traffic within the area of the proposed development The improvements identified in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study will significantly enhance the flow of traffic within the downtown area and will reduce vehicle delay and queueing. The following short-term improvements will enhance the flow of traffic within the downtown area: Short Term Improvements: o Installation of Directional Pedestrian Push Buttons at Signalized Intersections o Relocation of the Mount Prospect Police and Fire Station o Coordination with Metra Train Engineers o Relocation of Permit Parking Spaces for Commuter Permit Parking Lot SALOPS �:"28 Appendix Site Plan Level of Service Criteria Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Site Plan „ i IS N-103NII '3 I r/�r Maj 0 I�VNIOINVNIOINVNIOINVNIOINNVNIVIN 00 lolmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmolw ° " n; a u W CL V) D 0 2 MO N ri I I N H _ U r6 ~ Y U Q L II to O N �„ v U Q W J �� .� to N p+ L. rp N L � J Wz N_ �O r0 M w p a V. C H N Q Q W N � N N Q �p Lfl �` L11 U Q = :: � 9_- N ) c LOO C Q = = H 4J L d M V) 0 v N Z Y r6 u :. �' Q Q � a l0 I Q N O N }, C 7 O Z J N LOL a + L V) a' °o �Oy I..L N N o a Q '0 M a U o N W J J N L U } L ) o o M _ z L� W ~ a w o J a a u LZ H 2 c� � U y L C L o + Q + U CL oNLn N >_ ro W N00 m M N o �._ H Ln Ln W M H to Z J E _ F f a a N ZD lQ N 0 M O D i 0 In �O A „ i IS N-103NII '3 I r/�r Maj 0 I�VNIOINVNIOINVNIOINVNIOINNVNIVIN 00 lolmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmolw ° " n; a u W CL V) D 0 2 Level of Service Criteria LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA Signalized Intersections Average Level Delay Service Interpretation (seconds per vehicle) A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the <_ 10 green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 - 20 Level of Service A. C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles >20 - 35 are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear. Number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. D The volume -to -capacity ratio is high and either progression >35 - 55 is ineffective or the cycle length is too long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Progression is unfavorable. The volume -to -capacity ratio >55 - 80 is high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. F The volume -to -capacity ratio is very high, progression is >80.0 very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0-10 B >10-15 C > 15 -25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets HCM 6th TWSC 1: Maple Street & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 1 Lane Configurations 1� 0 272 136 +T Y - 136 Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 60 10 105 15 5 Future Vol, veh/h 95 60 10 105 15 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 168 0 272 136 Stage 1 - - - - 136 - Stage 2 - - - - 136 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1410 - 717 913 Stage 1 - - - - 890 - Stage 2 - - - - 890 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1410 - 711 913 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 711 - Stage 1 - - - - 883 - Stage 2 - - - - 890 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.029 - - 0.008 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.9 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2: Maple Street & Lincoln Street 02/22/2019 Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7 Intersection LOS A Lane Configurations 18% 8% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 6% 88% 100% 100% Vol Right, % 76% 4% Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 115 5 0 15 0 15 5 65 0 15 0 Future Vol, veh/h 10 115 5 0 15 0 15 5 65 0 15 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 125 5 0 16 0 16 5 71 0 16 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 WIN W Opposing Approach WB 0.1 0.1 EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8 7.4 7.3 7.5 Vol Left, % 18% 8% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 6% 88% 100% 100% Vol Right, % 76% 4% 0% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 85 130 15 15 LT Vol 15 10 0 0 Through Vol 5 115 15 15 RT Vol 65 5 0 0 Lane Flow Rate 92 141 16 16 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.097 0.162 0.019 0.019 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.795 4.126 4.232 4.281, Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 929 866 837 823 Service Time 1.879 2.169 2.304 2.375 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.163 0.019 0.019 HCM Control Delay 7.3 8 7.4 7.5 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th -tile Q 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.1 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: School Street & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Lane Configurations 1� 0 252 106 +T Y - 106 Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 5 15 105 10 15 Future Vol, veh/h 95 5 15 105 10 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 108 0 252 106 Stage 1 - - - - 106 - Stage 2 - - - - 146 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1483 - 737 948 Stage 1 - - - - 918 - Stage 2 - - - - 881 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1483 - 728 948 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 728 - Stage 1 - - - - 907 - Stage 2 - - - - 881 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.032 - - 0.011 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Maple Street & Access Drive 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 5.1 Lane Configurations Y 14 1� Stage 1 14 +T Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 10 5 60 15 Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 10 5 60 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 160 14 0 0 16 0 Stage 1 14 - - - - - Stage 2 146 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 831 1066 - - 1602 - Stage 1 1009 - - - - - Stage 2 881 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 797 1066 - - 1602 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 797 - - - - - Stage 1 968 - - - - - Stage 2 881 - - - - - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.005 0.041 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.4 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Lincoln Street & Access Drive 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 3.7 Lane Configurations 27 0 +' 1� Stage 1 Y - - 19 Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 85 10 15 5 5 Future Vol, veh/h 95 85 10 15 5 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 27 0 - 0 317 19 Stage 1 - - - - 19 - Stage 2 - - - - 298 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1587 - - - 676 1059 Stage 1 - - - - 1004 - Stage 2 - - - - 753 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1587 - - - 630 1059 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 630 - Stage 1 - - - - 936 - Stage 2 - - - - 753 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.065 - - - 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Maple Street & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Lane Configurations 1� 0 249 114 +T Y - 114 Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 20 15 95 65 20 Future Vol, veh/h 95 20 15 95 65 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 125 0 249 114 Stage 1 - - - - 114 - Stage 2 - - - - 135 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1462 - 739 939 Stage 1 - - - - 911 - Stage 2 - - - - 891 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1462 - 730 939 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 730 - Stage 1 - - - - 900 - Stage 2 - - - - 891 - HCM LOS B HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.12 - - 0.011 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2Maple Street& Lincoln Street 02/22/2019 Intersection Delay, a/voh 7.6 Intersection LOS A VolHCM Vol Right, 96 0% 4% Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 15 5 30 25 15 0 15 0 5 80 20 Future Vol veh/h 15 15 5 80 25 15 O 15 O 5 80 20 20 Lane Flow Rate 16 38 76 114 Degree of | Departure Headway (Hd) 4.221 4.219 4.146 4.04 Convergence,Y/N Yea Yea Yea Yea Mvmt Flow 16 16 5 33 27 16 0 16 0 5 87 22 Number ofLanes O 1 O O 1 O O 1 O O 1 O WIN W Opposing Approach WB 0.3 0.4 EB SB NB Conflicting Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting SB WB EB Control Delay 7.5 7.6 7.4 7.7 18-24Q'Maple Street Lofts O2/22/2018Existing PNPeak Hour Svnohro10Report Vol Right, 96 0% 4% 96 9% Control stop stop stop stop VolSign Traffic by Lane 15 35 70 105 LT Vol 0 15 30 5 Through Vol 15 15 25 80 RT Vol 0 5 15 20 Lane Flow Rate 16 38 76 114 Degree of | Departure Headway (Hd) 4.221 4.219 4.146 4.04 Convergence,Y/N Yea Yea Yea Yea Cap 836 838 854 879 Service Time 2.307 2.8 2.218 2.104 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 0.045 0.089 0.13 HCMControl Delay 74 75 78 77 HCM 95th'U|eO 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 18-24Q'Maple Street Lofts O2/22/2018Existing PNPeak Hour Svnohro10Report HCM 6th TWSC 3: School Street & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Lane Configurations 1� 0 245 120 +T Y - 120 Traffic Vol, veh/h 105 10 10 95 15 20 Future Vol, veh/h 105 10 10 95 15 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 125 0 245 120 Stage 1 - - - - 120 - Stage 2 - - - - 125 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1462 - 743 931 Stage 1 - - - - 905 - Stage 2 - - - - 901 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1462 - 737 931 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 737 - Stage 1 - - - - 898 - Stage 2 - - - - 901 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.045 - - 0.007 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Maple Street & Access Drive 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Lane Configurations Y 49 1� Stage 1 49 +T Traffic Vol, veh/h 60 15 45 0 0 45 Future Vol, veh/h 60 15 45 0 0 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 98 49 0 0 49 0 Stage 1 49 - - - - - Stage 2 49 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 901 1020 - - 1558 - Stage 1 973 - - - - - Stage 2 973 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 901 1020 - - 1558 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 901 - - - - - Stage 1 973 - - - - - Stage 2 973 - - - - - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.088 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - A A - 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Lincoln Street & Access Drive 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 4.8 Lane Configurations 27 0 +' 1� Stage 1 Y - - 27 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 20 25 0 10 45 Future Vol, veh/h 0 20 25 0 10 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 27 0 - 0 49 27 Stage 1 - - - - 27 - Stage 2 - - - - 22 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1587 - - - 960 1048 Stage 1 - - - - 996 - Stage 2 - - - - 1001 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1587 - - - 960 1048 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 960 - Stage 1 - - - - 996 - Stage 2 - - - - 1001 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - - - 0.058 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 8.7 HCM Lane LOS A - - - A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Maple Street & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Lane Configurations 1� 0 295 138 +T Y - 138 Traffic Vol, veh/h 99 55 15 115 30 20 Future Vol, veh/h 99 55 15 115 30 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 168 0 295 138 Stage 1 - - - - 138 - Stage 2 - - - - 157 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1410 - 696 910 Stage 1 - - - - 889 - Stage 2 - - - - 871 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1410 - 688 910 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 688 - Stage 1 - - - - 878 - Stage 2 - - - - 871 - HCM LOS B HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.071 - - 0.012 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2Maple Street& Lincoln Street 02/22/2019 Intersection Delay, a/voh 7.7 Intersection LOS A Vol Vol Right, 96 42% 4% 4% 5% Control stop stop stop stop VolSign Traffic by Lane 77 119 22 27 LT Vol Future Vol veh/h 52 82 5 1 18 3 15 30 82 7 16 4 Lane Flow Rate 84 129 24 29 Degree of | Departure Headway (Hd) 4.011 4.209 4.157 4.33 Convergence,Y/N Yea Yea Yea Yea Cap 879 845 849 832 Service Time 2.103 2.27 2.244 2.33 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.096 0.153 Number ofLanes O 1 O O 1 O O 1 O O 1 O WIN W Opposing Approach WB 0.1 0.1 EB SB NB Conflicting Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting SB WB EB HCMContro| Delay 8 7.4 7.5 7.5 Vol Vol Right, 96 42% 4% 4% 5% Control stop stop stop stop VolSign Traffic by Lane 77 119 22 27 LT Vol 15 52 1 7 Through Vol 30 82 18 18 Lane Flow Rate 84 129 24 29 Degree of | Departure Headway (Hd) 4.011 4.209 4.157 4.33 Convergence,Y/N Yea Yea Yea Yea Cap 879 845 849 832 Service Time 2.103 2.27 2.244 2.33 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.096 0.153 0.028 0.035 HCMControl Delay 75 8 74 75 HCM 95th'U|eO 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.1 18-24Q'Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2018 Projected ANPeak Hour Svnohro10Report HCM 6th TWSC 3: School Street & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Lane Configurations 1� 0 289 133 +T Y - 133 Traffic Vol, veh/h 120 5 15 114 10 15 Future Vol, veh/h 120 5 15 114 10 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 135 0 289 133 Stage 1 - - - - 133 - Stage 2 - - - - 156 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1449 - 702 916 Stage 1 - - - - 893 - Stage 2 - - - - 872 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1449 - 694 916 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 694 - Stage 1 - - - - 882 - Stage 2 - - - - 872 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.033 - - 0.011 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Maple Street & Access Drive 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Lane Configurations Y 52 1� Stage 1 52 +T Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 35 10 75 60 15 Future Vol, veh/h 12 35 10 75 60 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 198 52 0 0 93 0 Stage 1 52 - - - - - Stage 2 146 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 791 1016 - - 1501 - Stage 1 970 - - - - - Stage 2 881 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 756 1016 - - 1501 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 756 - - - - - Stage 1 927 - - - - - Stage 2 881 - - - - - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.055 0.043 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.1 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Lincoln Street & Access Drive 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Lane Configurations 28 0 +' 1� Stage 1 Y - - 21 Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 92 13 13 9 9 Future Vol, veh/h 9 92 13 13 9 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 28 0 - 0 141 21 Stage 1 - - - - 21 - Stage 2 - - - - 120 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1585 - - - 852 1056 Stage 1 - - - - 1002 - Stage 2 - - - - 905 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1585 - - - 846 1056 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 846 - Stage 1 - - - - 995 - Stage 2 - - - - 905 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.021 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - - 8.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 6: Access Drive & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Lane Configurations 1� 0 265 127 +T Y - 127 Traffic Vol, veh/h 115 4 4 120 10 10 Future Vol, veh/h 115 4 4 120 10 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 129 0 265 127 Stage 1 - - - - 127 - Stage 2 - - - - 138 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1457 - 724 923 Stage 1 - - - - 899 - Stage 2 - - - - 889 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1457 - 722 923 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 722 - Stage 1 - - - - 896 - Stage 2 - - - - 889 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.027 - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Maple Street & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 3.7 Lane Configurations 1� 0 326 138 +T Y - 138 Traffic Vol, veh/h 108 39 34 105 75 33 Future Vol, veh/h 108 39 34 105 75 33 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 159 0 326 138 Stage 1 - - - - 138 - Stage 2 - - - - 188 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1420 - 668 910 Stage 1 - - - - 889 - Stage 2 - - - - 844 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1420 - 649 910 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 649 - Stage 1 - - - - 864 - Stage 2 - - - - 844 - HCM LOS B HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.165 - - 0.026 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.1 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2Maple Street& Lincoln Street 02/22/2019 Intersection Delay, a/voh 7.6 Intersection LOS A VolHCM Vol Right, 96 0% 96 Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 19 5 22 21 23 0 18 2 11 65 20 Future Vol veh/h 20 19 5 22 21 23 O 18 2 11 65 20 20 Lane Flow Rate 22 48 72 104 Degree of | Departure Headway (Hd) 4.164 4.232 4.048 4.056 Convergence,Y/N Yea Yea Yea Yea Mvmt Flow 22 21 5 24 23 25 0 20 2 12 71 22 Number ofLanes O 1 O O 1 O O 1 O O 1 O WIN W Opposing Approach WB 0.3 0.4 EB SB NB Conflicting Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting SB WB EB Control Delay 7.6 7.5 7.4 7.7 18-24Q'Maple Street Lofts O2/22/2018Existing PNPeak Hour Svnohro10Report Vol Right, 96 0% 96 35% % Control stop stop stop stop VolSign Traffic by Lane 20 44 66 96 LT Vol 0 20 22 11 Through Vol 18 19 21 05 RT Vol 2 5 23 20 Lane Flow Rate 22 48 72 104 Degree of | Departure Headway (Hd) 4.164 4.232 4.048 4.056 Convergence,Y/N Yea Yea Yea Yea Cap 848 836 875 875 Service Time 2.245 2.308 2.12 2.12 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.057 0.082 0.119 HCM Control Delay 74 7.6 7.5 7.7 HCM 95th'U|eO 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 18-24Q'Maple Street Lofts O2/22/2018Existing PNPeak Hour Svnohro10Report HCM 6th TWSC 3: School Street & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Lane Configurations 1� 0 305 145 +T Y - 145 Traffic Vol, veh/h 128 10 10 127 15 20 Future Vol, veh/h 128 10 10 127 15 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 150 0 305 145 Stage 1 - - - - 145 - Stage 2 - - - - 160 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1431 - 687 902 Stage 1 - - - - 882 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1431 - 682 902 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 682 - Stage 1 - - - - 875 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.048 - - 0.008 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Maple Street & Access Drive 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 4.9 Lane Configurations Y 58 1� Stage 1 58 +T Traffic Vol, veh/h 51 38 45 16 38 45 Future Vol, veh/h 51 38 45 16 38 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 189 58 0 0 66 0 Stage 1 58 - - - - - Stage 2 131 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 800 1008 - - 1536 - Stage 1 965 - - - - - Stage 2 895 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 778 1008 - - 1536 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 778 - - - - - Stage 1 939 - - - - - Stage 2 895 - - - - - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.112 0.027 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.7 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Lincoln Street & Access Drive 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Lane Configurations 43 0 +' 1� Stage 1 Y - - 40 Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 26 33 6 11 33 Future Vol, veh/h 6 26 33 6 11 33 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 43 0 - 0 82 40 Stage 1 - - - - 40 - Stage 2 - - - - 42 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1566 - - - 920 1031 Stage 1 - - - - 982 - Stage 2 - - - - 980 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1566 - - - 915 1031 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 915 - Stage 1 - - - - 977 - Stage 2 - - - - 980 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.004 - - - 0.048 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - - 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 6: Access Drive & Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 1 Lane Configurations 1� 0 314 146 +T Y - 146 Traffic Vol, veh/h 128 13 13 129 10 10 Future Vol, veh/h 128 13 13 129 10 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 153 0 314 146 Stage 1 - - - - 146 - Stage 2 - - - - 168 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1428 - 679 901 Stage 1 - - - - 881 - Stage 2 - - - - 862 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1428 - 672 901 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 672 - Stage 1 - - - - 871 - Stage 2 - - - - 862 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.028 - - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/2212019 Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 10 490 75 30 320 40 55 440 60 15 450 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 490 75 30 320 40 55 440 60 15 450 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 125 0 115 0 65 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.980 0.983 0.982 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3453 0 1770 3469 0 1770 3459 0 1770 3531 0 Flt Permitted 0.496 0.189 0.412 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 918 3453 0 350 3469 0 761 3459 0 1746 3531 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 2109 466 282 1059 Travel Time (s) 47.9 10.6 6.4 24.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) $ 15 15 8 11 17 17' 11 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%° 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 595 0 32 379 0 58 526 0 16 479 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 41.5 6.0 34.5 7.5 40.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 8.8% 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 1.0 -2.5 1.0 -2.5 -0.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 51.5 45.6 62.3 54.1 86.1 90.1 7.6 49.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.27 0.37 0.32 0.51 0.53 0.04 0.29 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 37.5 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 36.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.0 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.64 0.14 0.34 0.09 0.29 0.20 0.47 Control Delay 14.5 21.3 33.6 42.4 0.3 0.4 107.5 40.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.5 21.3 33.6 42.4 0.3 0.6 107.5 40.8 LOS B C C D A A F D Approach Delay 21.1 41.8 0.5 43.0 Approach LOS C D A D Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 71 22 157 0 0 18 163 Queue Length 95th (ft) m3 m199 50 198 mo 0 m28 207 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2029 386 202 979 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 115 65 60 Base Capacity (vph) 340 926 234 1104 846 2209 114 1026 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 870 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.64 0.14 0.34 0.07 0.39 0.14 0.47 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 1, C 02, Emil \101� \40t "�% We* '41 \*110 6 . � ��j " t 0 8 (R) 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue + + 02/2212019 -#A --IN. -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ + T+ -q/ Lane Configurations + + r + + T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 45 60 5 15 20 15 5 495 5 55 475 25 Future Volume (vph) 45 60 5 15 20 15 5 495 5 55 475 25 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 185 0 60 70 70 0 25 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.79 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.989 0.850 0.999 0.993 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3497 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3535 0 1770 3499 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.710 0.457 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1416 3497 0 1318 1863 1245 770 3535 0 1761 3499 0 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 6 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 2538 450 457 282 Travel Time (s) 69.2 12.3 10.4 6.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 117 2 2 117 72 6 6' 72 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%° 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 68 0 16 21 16 5 526 0 58 526 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 56711 12411 Permitted Phases 12 12 8 56711 Detector Phase 3 312 12 12 12 8 8 56711 12411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 37.5 37.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 21.2% 21.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.8 32.3 12.5 12.5 12.5 39.8 39.8 83.9 129.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.19 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.49 0.76 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 41.5 40.5 6.0 34.5 7.5 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 22% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.10 0.17 0.15 0.18 0.03 0.64 0.07 0.20 Control Delay 85.2 40.6 78.7 77.3 79.3 55.6 64.4 25.2 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Delay 85.2 40.6 78.7 77.3 79.3 55.6 64.4 25.2 0.4 LOS F D E E E E E C A Approach Delay 58.8 78.3 64.3 2.8 Approach LOS E E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 51 31 18 22 18 5 290 53 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m92 m49 42 54 42 19 366 m87 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2458 370 377 202 Turn Bay Length (ft) 185 60 70 70 25 Base Capacity (vph) 93 1036 240 339 227 180 827 899 2655 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1309 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.64 0.06 0.39 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 36.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 1, C 02, Emil We* '41 \\� \�"�%*06 "t '+'I 8 (R) 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/2212019 Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 10 410 60 50 530 75 60 520 30 25 490 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 410 60 50 530 75 60 520 30 25 490 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 125 0 115 0 65 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.981 0.981 0.992 0.999 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3463 0 1770 3465 0 1770 3507 0 1770 3534 0 Flt Permitted 0.248 0.211 0.383 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 462 3463 0 392 3465 0 701 3507 0 1763 3534 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 2109 466 282 1059 Travel Time (s) 47.9 10.6 6.4 24.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 6 6 2 25 5 5 25 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%° 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 495 0 53 637 0 63 579 0 26 521 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 41.5 6.0 34.5 7.5 40.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 9.4% 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 1.0 -2.5 1.0 -2.5 -0.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 44.7 39.0 57.0 49.0 90.5 94.5 8.5 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.23 0.34 0.29 0.53 0.56 0.05 0.29 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 37.5 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 35.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.0 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.62 0.22 0.64 0.09 0.30 0.30 0.50 Control Delay 14.5 25.0 36.9 50.0 0.4 0.4 76.8 50.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.5 25.0 36.9 50.8 0.4 0.7 76.8 50.1 LOS B C D D A A E D Approach Delay 24.8 49.7 0.6 51.4 Approach LOS C D A D Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 256 39 261 0 0 23 301 Queue Length 95th (ft) m2 m361 74 305 mo 0 m33 363 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2029 386 202 979 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 115 65 60 Base Capacity (vph) 199 795 244 999 831 2235 124 1040 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 135 0 969 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.62 0.22 0.74 0.08 0.46 0.21 0.50 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 1, C 02, Emil `* \ \111106 \10' '" tO8 (R� 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue + + 02/2212019 -#A --IN. -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ + T+ -q/ Lane Configurations + + r + + T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 45 50 5 20 65 35 10 530 5 40 510 50 Future Volume (vph) 45 50 5 20 65 35 10 530 5 40 510 50 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 185 0 60 70 70 0 25 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.93 1.00 0.99 0.91 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.987 0.850 0.999 0.987 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3488 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3535 0 1770 3462 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.717 0.429 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1648 3488 0 1327 1863 1447 720 3535 0 1763 3462 0 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 13 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 2538 450 457 282 Travel Time (s) 69.2 12.3 10.4 6.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 4 4 43 82 5 5 82 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%° 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 58 0 21 68 37 11 563 0 42 590 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 56711 12411 Permitted Phases 12 12 8 56711 Detector Phase 3 312 12 12 12 8 8 56711 12411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 37.5 37.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 24.7%' 24.7% 24.7% 20.6% 20.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.8 37.0 17.2 17.2 17.2 39.5 39.5 79.5 125.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.22 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.47 0.74 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 41.5 40.5 6.0 34.5 7.5 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 22% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.08 0.16 0.36 0.25 0.07 0.68 0.05 0.23 Control Delay 86.9 40.9 73.7 78.0 76.1 57.8 66.2 23.1 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Delay 86.9 40.9 73.7 78.0 76.1 57.8 66.2 23.1 0.4 LOS F D E E E E E C A Approach Delay 61.5 76.7 66.0 1.9 Approach LOS E E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 26 22 74 40 10 316 37 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m90 m42 53 125 79 31 #404 m66 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2458 370 377 202 Turn Bay Length (ft) 185 60 70 70 25 Base Capacity (vph) 93 1033 241 339 263 167 822 856 2549 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1116 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.06 0.09 0.20 0.14 0.07 0.68 0.05 0.41 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. r% M e% ^f% f% Ile% AAlr'% i A I M i A % 'Dpl L5 d11U [1d5V,5 1UbPt!UL Vt![IUV, 1UbPdUL Mvt![IUU I r 2. !L6.) ot U. 6. 1 4J r M Jr 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/2212019 Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 10 490 75 30 300 40 55 450 60 15 449 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 490 75 30 300 40 55 450 60 15 449 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 125 0 115 0 65 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.980 0.982 0.982 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3453 0 1770 3465 0 1770 3459 0 1770 3531 0 Flt Permitted 0.517 0.174 0.412 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 956 3453 0 322 3465 0 761 3459 0 1746 3531 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 2109 466 282 1059 Travel Time (s) 47.9 10.6 6.4 24.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) $ 15 15 8 11 17 17' 11 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%° 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 595 0 32 358 0 58 537 0 16 478 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 41.5 6.0 34.5 7.5 40.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 8.8% 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 1.0 -2.5 1.0 -2.5 -0.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.4 43.5 60.6 52.4 87.8 91.8 7.6 49.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.26 0.36 0.31 0.52 0.54 0.04 0.29 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 37.5 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 36.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.0 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.67 0.14 0.34 0.09 0.29 0.20 0.47 Control Delay 14.8 22.9 35.1 43.5 0.4 0.4 107.5 40.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.8 22.9 35.1 43.5 0.4 0.6 107.5 40.9 LOS B C D D A A F D Approach Delay 22.7 42.8 0.6 43.1 Approach LOS C D A D Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 72 23 150 0 0 18 163 Queue Length 95th (ft) m3 m282 50 189 mo 0 m28 206 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2029 386 202 979 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 115 65 60 Base Capacity (vph) 338 884 225 1067 845 2205 114 1021 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 902 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.67 0.14 0.34 0.07 0.41 0.14 0.47 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 1, C 02, Emil \101� \40t "�% We* '41 \*110 6 . � J " t 0 8 (R) 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue + + 02/2212019 -#A --IN. -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ + T+ -q/ Lane Configurations + + r + + T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 45 60 5 15 40 25 5 495 5 54 475 25 Future Volume (vph) 45 60 5 15 40 25 5 495 5 54 475 25 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 185 0 60 70 70 0 25 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.81 1.00 1.00 0.79 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.989 0.850 0.999 0.993 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3497 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3535 0 1770 3499 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.710 0.457 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1426 3497 0 1318 1863 1245 770 3535 0 1761 3499 0 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 6 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 2538 450 457 282 Travel Time (s) 69.2 12.3 10.4 6.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 117 2 2 117 72 6 6' 72 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%° 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 68 0 16 42 26 5 526 0 57 526 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 56711 12411 Permitted Phases 12 12 8 56711 Detector Phase 3 312 12 12 12 8 8 56711 12411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 37.5 37.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 21.2% 21.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.8 34.3 14.4 14.4 14.4 39.6 39.6 82.2 127.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.20 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.48 0.75 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 41.5 40.5 6.0 34.5 7.5 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 22% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.10 0.14 0.27 0.25 0.03 0.64 0.07 0.20 Control Delay 85.2 39.5 75.4 77.7 79.3 55.6 64.5 25.0 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Delay 85.2 39.5 75.4 77.7 79.3 55.6 64.5 25.0 0.4 LOS F D E E E E E C A Approach Delay 58.2 77.8 64.5 2.8 Approach LOS E E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 51 31 17 45 28 5 290 52 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m92 m48 43 86 61 19 366 m85 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2458 370 377 202 Turn Bay Length (ft) 185 60 70 70 25 Base Capacity (vph) 93 1036 240 339 227 179 822 880 2614 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1267 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.11 0.03 0.64 0.06 0.39 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay: 37.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 1, C 02, Emil til 11v `* \\111106 \IN. - t 08 (R) 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/2212019 Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 10 410 60 50 570 70 60 529 30 25 506 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 410 60 50 570 70 60 529 30 25 506 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 125 0 115 0 65 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.981 0.984 0.992 0.999 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3463 0 1770 3477 0 1770 3507 0 1770 3534 0 Flt Permitted 0.207 0.207 0.366 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 386 3463 0 384 3477 0 670 3507 0 1763 3534 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 2109 466 282 1059 Travel Time (s) 47.9 10.6 6.4 24.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 6 6 2 25 5 5 25 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%° 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 495 0 53 674 0 63 589 0 26 538 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 41.5 6.0 34.5 7.5 40.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 9.4% 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 1.0 -2.5 1.0 -2.5 -0.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 44.5 38.4 56.4 48.0 91.1 95.1 8.5 49.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.23 0.33 0.28 0.54 0.56 0.05 0.29 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 37.5 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 35.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 2.0 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.63 0.22 0.69 0.09 0.30 0.30 0.52 Control Delay 14.7 25.8 37.9 52.6 0.4 0.3 76.8 50.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.7 25.8 37.9 53.6 0.4 0.6 76.8 50.6 LOS B C D D A A E D Approach Delay 25.5 52.5 0.6 51.8 Approach LOS C D A D Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 293 39 280 0 0 23 312 Queue Length 95th (ft) m2 m361 75 384 mo 0 m33 377 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2029 386 202 979 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 115 65 60 Base Capacity (vph) 180 782 241 981 823 2233 124 1038 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 119 0 976 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.63 0.22 0.78 0.08 0.47 0.21 0.52 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 1, C 02, Emil `* \ \111106 \10' '" tO8 (R� 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 02/22/2019 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue + + 02/2212019 -#A --IN. -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ + T+ -q/ Lane Configurations + + r + + T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 45 50 5 20 70 44 10 530 5 56 510 50 Future Volume (vph) 45 50 5 20 70 44 10 530 5 56 510 50 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 185 0 60 70 70 0 25 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.93 1.00 0.99 0.91 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.987 0.850 0.999 0.987 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3488 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3535 0 1770 3462 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.717 0.429 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1649 3488 0 1327 1863 1447 720 3535 0 1763 3462 0 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 13 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 2538 450 457 282 Travel Time (s) 69.2 12.3 10.4 6.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 4 4 43 82 5 5 82 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%° 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 58 0 21 74 46 11 563 0 59 590 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 56711 12411 Permitted Phases 12 12 8 56711 Detector Phase 3 312 12 12 12 8 8 56711 12411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 37.5 37.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 24.7%' 24.7% 24.7% 20.6% 20.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.8 37.7 17.9 17.9 17.9 39.4 39.4 78.9 124.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.46 0.73 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 41.5 40.5 6.0 34.5 7.5 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 22% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.07 0.15 0.38 0.30 0.07 0.69 0.07 0.23 Control Delay 86.9 40.6 72.7 77.9 77.1 57.8 66.3 24.0 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Delay 86.9 40.6 72.7 77.9 77.1 57.8 66.3 24.0 0.4 LOS F D E E E E E C A Approach Delay 61.3 76.9 66.1 2.5 Approach LOS E E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 26 22 80 50 10 316 52 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m90 m42 51 133 91 31 #404 m86 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2458 370 377 202 Turn Bay Length (ft) 185 60 70 70 25 Base Capacity (vph) 93 1033 241 339 263 166 820 845 2534 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1122 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.06 0.09 0.22 0.17 0.07 0.69 0.07 0.42 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. r% M e% ^f% f% Ile% AAlr'% i A I M i A % 'Dpl L5 d11U [1d5V,5 1UbPt!UL Vt![IUV, 1UbPdUL Mvt![IUU I r 2. !L6.) ot U. 6. 1 4J r M Jr 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 02/22/2019 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 25: Emerson Street & US 14 02/27/2019 .w.0A -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ \40. -q/ Lane Configurations + + T+ T+ T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 30 510 25 40 330 30 30 130 55 30 105 10 Future Volume (vph) 30 510 25 40 330 30 30 130 55 30 105 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 110 0 105 0 50 0 95 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.98 1.00 Frt 0.993 0.987 0.955 0.986 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 0 1805 3485 0 1805 1792 0 1805 1865 0 Flt Permitted 0.527 0.417 0.645 0.486 Satd. Flow (perm) 985 3505 0 774 3485 0 1187 1792 0 902 1865 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 13 29 7 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 20 20 Link Distance (ft) 466 458 244 846 Travel Time (s) 10.6 10.4 8.3 28.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 17 31 31 17 46 34 34 46 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 563 0 42 379 0 32 195 0 32 122 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 28.5 6.0 31.5 34.5 34.5 36.5 36.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 35.0 13.0 35.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 15.3% 41.2% 15.3% 41.2% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 1.0 -2.5 1.0 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 56.6 53.4 56.9 53.5 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.63 0.67 0.63 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Econolite #197 -Existing AM Traffic 06/29/2017 Synchro 10 Report Sam Schwartz Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 25: Emerson Street & US 14 02/27/2019 Control Delay 1.0 1.5 5.5 8.0 26.4 28.3 27.7 27.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.0 1.5 5.5 8.0 26.4 28.3 27.7 27.5 LOS A A A A C C C C Approach Delay 1.5 7.8 28.1 27.5 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 18 6 42 14 78 14 52 Queue Length 95th (ft) m2 27 19 79 35 128 35 90 Internal Link Dist (ft) 386 378 164 766 Turn Bay Length (ft) 110 105 50 95 Base Capacity (vph) 768 2204 645 2199 460 713 350 728 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 1610111 ' 0.26 0.07 0.17 0.07 0.27 0.09 0.17 1� 1" �� ffil � Ni 11 Area Type: Other M Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 85 Offset: 27 (32%), Referenced to phase 2: EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.49 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 25: Emerson Street & US 14 Econolite #197 -Existing AM Traffic 06/29/2017 Synchro 10 Report Sam Schwartz Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 25: Emerson Street & US 14 02/27/2019 .w.0A -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ \40. -q/ Lane Configurations + + T+ T+ T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 30 410 25 105 640 40 40 145 30 20 155 15 Future Volume (vph) 30 410 25 105 640 40 40 145 30 20 155 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 110 0 105 0 50 0 95 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.99 Frt 0.991 0.991 0.974 0.987 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3503 0 1805 3501, 0 1805 1836 0 1805 1866 0 Flt Permitted 0.361 0.450 0.522 0.509 Satd. Flow (perm) 679 3503 0 846 3501, 0 957 1836 0 942 1866 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 9 13 6 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 20 20 Link Distance (ft) 466 458 244 846 Travel Time (s) 10.6 10.4 8.3 28.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 11 11 19 55 39 39 55 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%° 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 458 0 111 716 0 42 185 0 21 179 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 28.5 6.0 31.5 34.5 34.5 36.5 36.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 41.0 13.0 41.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 15.3% 48.2% 15.3% 48.2% 36.5% 36.5% 36.5% 36.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 1.0 -2.5 1.0 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 54.6 50.5 57.7 53.4 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.59 0.68 0.63 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Econolite #197 - PM Existing Traffic Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 25: Emerson Street & US 14 02/27/2019 Control Delay 1.6 2.1 5.8 9.2 28.4 30.2 26.1 30.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.6 2.1 5.8 9.2 28.4 30.2 26.1 30.9 LOS A A A A C C C C Approach Delay 2.1 8.8 29.8 30.4 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 15 16 92 19 81 9 81 Queue Length 95th (ft) m4 23 42 158 42 129 26 127 Internal Link Dist (ft) 386 378 164 766 Turn Bay Length (ft) 110 105 50 95 Base Capacity (vph) 579 2083 686 2204 303 592 299 596 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 1610111 ' 0.22 0.16 0.33 0.14 0.31 0.07 0.30 1� 1" �� ffil 1101'wi� NE � Ni 11 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 85 Offset: 33 (39%), Referenced to phase 2: EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 25: Emerson Street & US 14 Econolite #197 - PM Existing Traffic Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 25: Emerson Street & US 14 02/27/2019 .w.0A -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ \40. -q/ Lane Configurations + + T+ T+ T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 30 510 25 40 330 30 30 145 55 30 105 10 Future Volume (vph) 30 510 25 40 330 30 30 145 55 30 105 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 110 0 105 0 50 0 95 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.98 1.00 Frt 0.993 0.987 0.959 0.986 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 0 1805 3485 0 1805 1801 0 1805 1865 0 Flt Permitted 0.527 0.414 0.650 0.469 Satd. Flow (perm) 985 3505 0 768 3485 0 1196 1801 0 872 1865 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 13 26 7 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 20 20 Link Distance (ft) 466 458 244 846 Travel Time (s) 10.6 10.4 8.3 28.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 17 31 31 17 46 34 34 46 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 563 0 42 379 0 32 211 0 32 122 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 28.5 6.0 31.5 34.5 34.5 36.5 36.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 35.0 13.0 35.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 15.3% 41.2% 15.3% 41.2% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 1.0 -2.5 1.0 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 55.5 52.2 55.7 52.4 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.61 0.66 0.62 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 25: Emerson Street & US 14 02/27/2019 .eo# -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ \40. -4/ Control Delay 1.1 1.7 6.0 8.7 25.0 28.3 26.4 26.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.1 1.7 6.0 8.7 25.0 28.3 26.4 26.1 LOS A A A A C C C C Approach Delay 1.7 8.4 27.9 26.2 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 20 6 44 14 87 14 52 Queue Length 95th (ft) m3 30 20 83 33 137 34 87 Internal Link Dist (ft) 386 378 164 766 Turn Bay Length (ft) 110 105 50 95 Base Capacity (vph) 754 2155 631 2151 464 715 338 728 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 1610111 ' 0.26 0.07 0.18 0.07 0.30 0.09 0.17 1� 1" �� ffil 1101'wi� NE � Ni 11 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 85 Offset: 27 (32%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 25: Emerson Street & US 14 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 25: Emerson Street & US 14 02/27/2019 .w.0A -*%v Ir +-- *%.- -4\ \40. -q/ Lane Configurations + + T+ T+ T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 30 410 25 105 640 40 40 156 30 20 171 15 Future Volume (vph) 30 410 25 105 640 40 40 156 30 20 171 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 110 0 105 0 50 0 95 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 Frt 0.991 0.991 0.976 0.988 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3503 0 1805 3501, 0 1805 1840 0 1805 1868 0 Flt Permitted 0.359 0.448 0.495 0.495 Satd. Flow (perm) 675 3503 0 842 3501, 0 908 1840 0 916' 1868 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 9 12 6 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 20 20 Link Distance (ft) 466 458 244 846 Travel Time (s) 10.6 10.4 8.3 28.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 11 11 19 55 39 39 55 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%° 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 458 0 111 716 0 42 196 0 21 196 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.0 28.5 6.0 31.5 34.5 34.5 36.5 36.5 Total Split (s) 13.0 41.0 13.0 41.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 15.3% 48.2% 15.3% 48.2% 36.5% 36.5% 36.5% 36.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 1.0 -2.5 1.0 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 53.8 49.7 57.0 52.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.58 0.67 0.62 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 25: Emerson Street & US 14 02/27/2019 Control Delay 1.7 2.2 6.1 9.7 27.9 30.0 25.4 30.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.7 2.2 6.1 9.7 27.9 30.0 25.4 30.9 LOS A A A A C C C C Approach Delay 2.2 9.2 29.6 30.3 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 15 17 94 19 86 9 89 Queue Length 95th (ft) m4 23 43 162 42 135 25 137 Internal Link Dist (ft) 386 378 164 766 Turn Bay Length (ft) 110 105 50 95 Base Capacity (vph) 571 2050 677 2173 288 592 290 597 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 1610111 ' 0.22 0.16 0.34 0.15 0.33 0.07 0.33 1� 1" �� ffil 1101'wi� NE � Ni 11 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 85 Offset: 33 (39%), Referenced to phase 2: EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 25: Emerson Street & US 14 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Emerson Street & Prospect Avenue 02/27/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 6.8 Lane Configurations 558 +' r 486 455 r 108 4� Stage 1 268 T+ - Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 65 25 5 45 10 10 115 10 80 75 15 Future Vol, veh/h 30 65 25 5 45 10 10 115 10 80 75 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 112 0 5 5 0 112 13 0 30 30 0 13 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - 50 - - - 65 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 558 452 105 486 455 269 108 0 0 162 0 0 Stage 1 268 268 - 179 179 - - - - - - - Stage 2 290 184 - 307 276 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 440 503 949 492 501 770 1495 - - 1429 - - Stage1 738 687 - 823 751 - - - - - - - Stage 2 718 747 - 703 682 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 339 452 935 390 450 681 1479 - - 1393 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 339 452 - 390 450 - - - - - - - Stage 1 724 639 - 796 726 - - - - - - - Stage 2 594 722 - 571 634 - - - - - - - Wiriffil N" I HCM Control Delay, s 15 13.6 0.6 3.6 HCM LOS C B HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.007 - - 0.244 0.028 0.119 0.015 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 16.6 9 14.2 10.4 7.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - C A B B A Econolite #197 -Existing AM Traffic 06/29/2017 Synchro 10 Report Sam Schwartz Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Emerson Street & Prospect Avenue 02/27/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 6.3 Lane Configurations 634 +' r 600 608 r 274 4� Stage 1 364 1� - Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 50 30 10 65 85 10 115 10 55 180 50 Future Vol, veh/h 15 50 30 10 65 85 10 115 10 55 180 50 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 43 0 8 8 0 43 32 0 69 69 0 32 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - 50 - - - 65 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 634 587 256 600 608 239 274 0 0 201 0 0 Stage 1 364 364 - 218 218 - - - - - - - Stage 2 270 223 - 382 390 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 392 422 783 413 410 800 1301 - - 1383 - - Stage 1 655 624 - 784 723 - - - - - - - Stage 2 736 719 - 640 608 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 264 366 757 317 356 727 1266 - - 1303 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 264 366 - 317 356 - - - - - - - Stage 1 632 580 - 732 676 - - - - - - - Stage 2 554 672 - 529 565 - - - - - - - Wiriffil N" I HCM Control Delay, s 15.7 14.2 0.6 1.5 HCM LOS C B HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.008 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 HCM Lane LOS A - - 0.204 0.042 0.226 0.123 0.044 0 - 18.4 10 18.3 10.6 7.9 A - C B C B A Econolite #197 - PM Existing Traffic Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Emerson Street & Prospect Avenue 02/27/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 7.2 Lane Configurations 571 +' r 486 455 r 108 4� Stage 1 268 T+ - Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 64 25 5 55 25 10 115 10 80 75 15 Future Vol, veh/h 30 64 25 5 55 25 10 115 10 80 75 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 112 0 5 5 0 112 13 0 30 30 0 13 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - 50 - - - 65 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 571 452 105 486 455 269 108 0 0 162 0 0 Stage 1 268 268 - 179 179 - - - - - - - Stage 2 303 184 - 307 276 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 432 503 949 492 501 770 1495 - - 1429 - - Stage1 738 687 - 823 751 - - - - - - - Stage 2 706 747 - 703 682 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 319 452 935 390 450 681 1479 - - 1393 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 319 452 - 390 450 - - - - - - - Stage 1 724 639 - 796 726 - - - - - - - Stage 2 562 722 - 572 634 - - - - - - - Wiriffil N" I HCM Control Delay, s 15.3 13.3 0.6 3.6 HCM LOS C B HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.007 - - 0.248 0.028 0.142 0.039 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 17 9 14.4 10.5 7.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - C A B B A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts 02/22/2019 Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report BSM Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Emerson Street & Prospect Avenue 02/27/2019 Int Delay, s/veh 7.3 Lane Configurations 679 +' r 642 642 r 274 4� Stage 1 398 1� - Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 66 30 10 74 96 10 115 10 71 180 50 Future Vol, veh/h 15 66 30 10 74 96 10 115 10 71 180 50 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 43 0 8 8 0 43 32 0 69 69 0 32 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - 50 - - - 65 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 679 621 256 642 642 239 274 0 0 201 0 0 Stage 1 398 398 - 218 218 - - - - - - - Stage 2 281 223 - 424 424 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 366 403 783 387 392 800 1301 - - 1383 - - Stage 1 628 603 - 784 723 - - - - - - - Stage 2 726 719 - 608 587 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 231 345 757 279 336 727 1266 - - 1303 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 231 345 - 279 336 - - - - - - - Stage 1 606 553 - 732 676 - - - - - - - Stage 2 528 672 - 477 538 - - - - - - - Wiriffil N" I HCM Control Delay, s 17.7 15.1 0.6 1.9 HCM LOS C C HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.008 - - 0.27 0.042 0.27 0.139 0.057 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 20.6 10 20 10.8 7.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - C B C B A 18-249 - Maple Street Lofts Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour Page 1 Integra Realty Resources Market Study Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Multifamily Property Southeast corner of Prospect Avenue and Maple Street Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois 60056 Prepared For: Wingspan Development Group LLC Effective Date of the Market Study: November 2018 IRR - Chicago File Number: 194-2018-1791 V1 % B V P4 YJ ,usc. Amff"J APLEg �F�p wiAldi (Rendering of Buildings A) and Site Plan for Overall Development SEC Prospect Ave &Maple St Mount Prospect, Illinois Integra l Resources Chicago February 27, 2019 Mr. Chris Coleman Wingspan Development Group 1001 Feehanville Drive Mount Prospect, IL 60056 400 E Randolph Street I.... 312,565.0977 Bunte 715 IF 312.565.3436 Chicago, IIL 60601 7388 www.irr.com SUBJECT: Market Study Proposed Maple Street Lofts, SEC Prospect and Maple Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois 60056 IRR - Chicago File No. 194-2018-1791 Dear Mr. Coleman: Integra Realty Resources — Chicago is pleased to submit the accompanying market study of the referenced property. Information for this report was researched and gathered from property inspections and conversations with brokers, developers, lenders, investors, managers, and leasing agents involved in the Suburban Chicago apartment market. On a quarterly basis since 2005, we have also researched the rental apartment market for Suburban Chicago. This ongoing work, along with our database going back 40+ years, well positions us to analyze and understand market trends specific to the proposed project. Wingspan Development Group February 27, 2019 Page 2 Should you have any questions about this report or desire further consultations as you decide to move forward, please do not hesitate to call us directly. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, Integra Realty Resources - Chicago li�e, Gail Lissner, SRA, CRE Managing Director Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Illinois Certificate # 553.001842 Expires 9/30/19 Telephone: 312-565-3423 Email: glissner@irr.com W i I n.16 rA.T911 ROT a =A General Information Purpose of the Market Study Effective Date Intended Use and User Sources of Data /Extent of Research Applicable Requirements Report Format Prior Services Inspection Executive Summary and Conclusions Rental Analysis and Conclusions Maps and Site Plans Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Suburban Multi -Family Housing Supply Economic Analysis Chicago MSA Area Analysis Demographic Trends — 2018 Statistics 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 15 23 39 46 46 51 Rental Competition Survey 56 Existing Competition 56 Future Competition 59 Rental Competition Summary and Details 63 Proposed Maple Street Lofts Lease -up Absorption Survey Certification Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Addenda A. Qualifications irr 95 97 99 General Information • • Purpose of the Market Study The purpose of this report is to provide: o Overview of the northwest suburban apartment market. o Analysis of the market demand for new rental apartment units at this location. o Analysis of the projected renter profile. o Survey and overview of the primary rental apartment competition in the market in terms of current and proposed inventory, unit sizes and mix, amenities and finishes, parking, rent trends, occupancy levels, and absorption rates. 2 o Critique of the proposed development in terms of unit mix, unit sizes, unit finishes and project amenities. o Conclusions regarding market rent levels and absorption projections for the units which we have proposed for development. The rent levels will be projected in current dollars and at the time of projected occupancy. Effective Date The effective date of the analysis and conclusions is November 2018. Intended Use and User The addressee on the letter of transmittal is the client and the intended user of this report. This report is prepared for exclusive use by the addressee for internal planning purposes. Sources of Data /Extent of Research An inspection of the subject site and neighborhood was completed along with a review of the architectural drawings which were provided for the subject property. The following data sources were researched: • Inspection of the site and a review of the site plans • Visual inspection of the immediate neighborhood • Ongoing discussions with brokers, developers, lenders and investors active in the suburban Chicago rental market • Inspection of the competing rental buildings in the market and discussions with management and leasing agents it Proposed Maple Street Lofts General Information • Previous assignments where information was not confidential Applicable Requirements This market study is intended to conform to the requirements of the following: • Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP); • Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute; Report Format This report is prepared under the Appraisal Report option of Standards Rule 2-2(a) of USPAP. Prior Services 3 USPAP requires appraisers to disclose to the client any other services they have provided in connection with the subject property in the prior three years, including valuation, consulting, property management, brokerage, or any other services. We have not performed any services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. Inspection Gail Lissner, SRA, CRE, conducted an inspection of the property in November 2018. it Proposed Maple Street Lofts Executive Summary and Conclusions .xecutive Summary and Conclusions Maple Street Lofts - Building A - Architect's Rendering Location SEC Prospect Ave & Maple St Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois 60056 Concept The subject is a vacant lot bordered on the north by E. Prospect Avenue, on the south by East Lincoln Street, and on the west by S. Maple Street. The current plan for the site includes the following: 4 • 6 -story apartment building fronting on E. Prospect Avenue and S. Maple Street with 192 units, an enclosed parking garage for 245 cars, 36 outdoor spaces, and 14,000 SF of retail space (Building A) • 7 -story apartment building fronting on E. Prospect Avenue with 65 units and an enclosed parking garage for 65 cars and 21 outdoor spaces (no retail space) • A 3 -story, 268 space parking deck situated directly south of the 6 -story building • 56 rowhomes at the southern edge of the site it Proposed Maple Street Lofts Executive Summary and Conclusions 5 The subject of this report is only the rental apartment component of the development. The unit mix for the rental apartment component of the development is currently planned to include the following: 3BR 0 Total Units 192 Avg Unit SF Conclusion 0 0 0% 65 257 100% 0 0 0 1471P880 541,550 2021430 770 839 788 Based upon our analysis of the subject location and the current trends in the northwest suburban rental apartment market, we believe that the developer's proposed unit mix will be well oriented for rental demand and have concluded net effective rents of approximately $2.41 in current dollars, along with covered parking at $75 per space per month. Rents have been projected to increase at an annual rate of 2% until occupancy. Rental Analysis and Conclusions Property Location The subject property is located in Mount Prospect, a community of approximately 54,000 persons located northwest of O'Hare Airport in the northwest suburbs of Chicago. The location is 25 miles from Chicago's central business district ("The Loop") and 10 miles from O'Hare Airport. Specifically, the subject is located on the southern edge of the downtown area, with the majority of the retail amenities north of the train tracks and Northwest Highway. The village is bordered by Prospect Heights on the north, Glenview and Des Plaines on the east, Des Plaines and Elk Grove Village on the south and Arlington Heights on the west. Interstate 90 runs northwesterly south of the Village boundaries. The Union Pacific/Northwest train Line has a stop at Route 14 between Emerson and Main in downtown Mount Prospect within one blocks of the subject property, providing transportation to Downtown Chicago's Ogilvie Transportation Center. Overall, the subject property's location in downtown Mount Prospect is considered to be good. It has a walkable location and excellent proximity to the Metra station and Lions Park which is situated directly to the south. However, the train tracks divide the downtown area and much of the newer commercial and residential development that has occurred over the last 15 years has been on the north side of the train tracks. Currently, two apartment projects are being planned for the downtown market in addition to the subject property. Nicholas Associates, the same developer as the subject property, is currently building 20 West Apartments, a 73 -unit apartment building at Northwest Highway and Wille. In addition, an 86 unit building is currently proposed for development at Central and Main Street, at the northern edge of the downtown market. The developers are First Equity Group, LLC and Harlem Irving Companies. Until the development of 20West which is currently under construction in downtown Ji Proposed Maple Street Lofts Developer's Total SF Unit Type Bldg A Bldg D Total % Avg SF Bldg A Bldg D Total Studio 38 5 43 17% 550 201900 21750 23,650 1BR 124 40 164 64% 770 95,480 30,800 126,280 2 BR 30 20 50 19% 1,050 31,500 21,000 52,500 3BR 0 Total Units 192 Avg Unit SF Conclusion 0 0 0% 65 257 100% 0 0 0 1471P880 541,550 2021430 770 839 788 Based upon our analysis of the subject location and the current trends in the northwest suburban rental apartment market, we believe that the developer's proposed unit mix will be well oriented for rental demand and have concluded net effective rents of approximately $2.41 in current dollars, along with covered parking at $75 per space per month. Rents have been projected to increase at an annual rate of 2% until occupancy. Rental Analysis and Conclusions Property Location The subject property is located in Mount Prospect, a community of approximately 54,000 persons located northwest of O'Hare Airport in the northwest suburbs of Chicago. The location is 25 miles from Chicago's central business district ("The Loop") and 10 miles from O'Hare Airport. Specifically, the subject is located on the southern edge of the downtown area, with the majority of the retail amenities north of the train tracks and Northwest Highway. The village is bordered by Prospect Heights on the north, Glenview and Des Plaines on the east, Des Plaines and Elk Grove Village on the south and Arlington Heights on the west. Interstate 90 runs northwesterly south of the Village boundaries. The Union Pacific/Northwest train Line has a stop at Route 14 between Emerson and Main in downtown Mount Prospect within one blocks of the subject property, providing transportation to Downtown Chicago's Ogilvie Transportation Center. Overall, the subject property's location in downtown Mount Prospect is considered to be good. It has a walkable location and excellent proximity to the Metra station and Lions Park which is situated directly to the south. However, the train tracks divide the downtown area and much of the newer commercial and residential development that has occurred over the last 15 years has been on the north side of the train tracks. Currently, two apartment projects are being planned for the downtown market in addition to the subject property. Nicholas Associates, the same developer as the subject property, is currently building 20 West Apartments, a 73 -unit apartment building at Northwest Highway and Wille. In addition, an 86 unit building is currently proposed for development at Central and Main Street, at the northern edge of the downtown market. The developers are First Equity Group, LLC and Harlem Irving Companies. Until the development of 20West which is currently under construction in downtown Ji Proposed Maple Street Lofts Executive Summary and Conclusions 6 Mount Prospect, there had been no large-scale rental apartment development in many years in Mount Prospect, resulting in a lack of Class A rental housing in the community. Housing alternatives in the downtown area consist of mid -rise condominium buildings, not rental apartment properties at the present time. Retail amenities are extensive. 1.5 miles from the subject property in Mount Prospect is Randhurst Village, a recently renovated mixed-use retail center with approximately 40 stores and restaurants, a multi -screen cinema, and hotel. Larger retailers include Costco, Bed Bath and Beyond and Home Depot. Seven miles southwest in Schaumburg is Woodfield Mall, the largest mall in the Chicago Metropolitan area. This is a premier shopping center and destination for both locals and tourists. Anchor tenants include Macy's, Nordstrom, Lord & Taylor, JC Penny and Sears. There are approximately 300 stores. Ikea, one of its two stores in the Chicagoland area, is also located in Schaumburg. To the south of the mall is the Streets of Woodfield which includes a 20 -screen movie theater as well as additional retailers including Crate and Barrel, Dick's Sporting Goods and a Legoland Discovery Center. Northwest Cook County Suburban Rental Market Conditions The Cook County Northwest submarket is defined as roughly Interstate 294 to the east, Lake County on the north, Route 59 on the west and DuPage County to the south. O'Hare International Airport is at the southeastern most part of the submarket. The Integra Realty Resources - Chicago internal database for the Cook County Northwest submarket consists of 25,681 dwelling units which are tracked on a quarterly basis. The median unit size for the submarket is 877 square feet which is in-line with the overall suburban market. The median year built was 1975 compared to the overall suburban market having a median of 1986. Cook County Northwest was one of the first submarkets to be developed in suburban Chicago to a significant density. However, no new apartment development took place in the 1990s or early 2000s. It was not until 60 units were constructed in Des Plaines in 2011 that there was any new rental product added to this submarket since the 1980s, and these 60 units actually began construction as condominiums but were completed as rental apartments due to the downturn in the for -sale market. There have only been a few new projects added to this rather sizable market during the past few years, but development activity has increased with 315 units delivered in 2018 and 1,044 units currently under construction for delivery in 2019+. The lack of newer product in the Northwest Cook County submarket had clearly been more a function of lack of suitable sites for development rather than submarket economics. As shown below, new rental apartment development did not occur in the Northwest Cook County submarket for many years and has only begun occurring in the past few years. it Proposed Maple Street Lofts Executive Summary and Conclusions 7 Unllts 111n Cloolk, N!W Submarket Iii' ce 2019 lilitelgra IIRealty, e u irces. - Chiiicagc, µ;Vi Of) DID O ,m u � T,--1 r%" �'f��, 1" J) � x, �,I � ( .) VI" x"111 V�,�'0 � � (" .4 � ,��I �� ?„11rl1� L X 111 �,.,,� V'” CIII "'IN � „ ui �, uI CCII F uI a ui Flu u� 1 0 �� C21 CD �� lC,21 u7�� TIN � T....IN )i u�,,, )i r °lu a 7lu o� N; o o oil N" o C) oil N" o o oil N. uk a N Nom'" uk u -i -J Ip % Nil 6 „ K"D Median net rent per square foot as of 3Q 2018 stands at $1.52, a gain of 1.4 percent from a year ago. Rents in the Northwest Cook submarket are up 4.0 percent compared to the levels posted two years ago. One -bedrooms have a median rent of $1,198 while two bedrooms have a median net rent of $1,414. Occupancy is flat over the past year with a current level of 95.3 percent. The submarket remains relatively "full" with pricing therefore expected to remain stable. Renter Profile The subject property is situated in a submarket which has experienced limited new rental apartment construction until recently. Only within the last two years has significant new product come onto the market in the Northwest Cook submarket. These new developments include One Arlington in Arlington Heights, Northgate Crossing in Wheeling, North 680 in Schaumburg and Buckingham Place in Des Plaines. Additionally, there is an apartment building under construction in downtown Mount Prospect at Northwest Highway, Willie and Busse called 20 West, a 73 -unit luxury apartment building. Thus, persons who are employed in the Northwest Suburbs had limited new Class A apartment options until very recently. Persons desiring a luxury apartment within close proximity to employment within Schaumburg or Rosemont would need to travel significant distances to find a newly constructed, Class A rental apartment development. We note that Des Plaines' Kingston Pointe and River 595 are located in Northwest Cook. However, these buildings were originally planned as condominiums and have unit sizes which are more reflective of the condominium market rather than the rental apartment market. The subject has a transit -oriented location and offers easy access to a Metra station, making a train ride to Chicago's Loop an easy commute. Thus, a segment of the renters in the market will be attracted to the site due to its proximity to the Metra station and the amenities offered by a suburban downtown location. It is anticipated that the renter profile will be comprised of persons who work in the area, commute via train or 1-90, 1-290, or 1-294 or couples who work in different parts of the metropolitan area and require a location which is centralized for their individual commutes. With the proximity to the it Proposed Maple Street Lofts Executive Summary and Conclusions 8 O'Hare and Schaumburg office markets and the multitude of other employment opportunities available via the highway network, this is a rather central location for a person working in the northwest suburban market. We also view the demand for this location to be from persons who have a connection to Mount Prospect. It is also a location which could also appeal to persons in transition — i.e. moving locally or transferees, persons in the process of obtaining a divorce, divorced parents, or active grandparents relocating to be closer to their adult children and grandchildren and desiring a new construction rental apartment. While empty nesters are a very logical segment of the expected market, we note that there are no grocery stores currently located in downtown Mount Prospect which diminishes its attractiveness to persons desiring a very walkable, heavily amenitized downtown suburban location. Thus, all residents would be expected to own cars. Competition Overview While Mount Prospect has had condominium development in the last 15-20 years, there has not been any new rental development. The existing rentals in Mount Prospect tend to be situated in the southern end of the community and consist primarily of 1970's construction. The following is a sampling of these developments along with the current rents that are being achieved: Thus, these buildings are significantly inferior to the new luxury rental apartments which are being proposed for development on the subject site. Rather than competing with the existing, modest Class C rental supply in Mount Prospect, the competition for the subject property will be spread out geographically. The subject will compete with other rental apartment developments also located within the Northwest Cook submarket with primary competition from the new 20 West Apartments which are under construction. We focused on properties located in adjoining suburbs and placed particular weight on properties which offer a similar type of downtown location. At the present time, this is not available in many northwest suburbs, but apartment buildings have been developed in downtown locations in Glenview, Des Plaines, and Park Ridge with one under construction currently in Mt Prospect. Sixteen large apartment properties comprising of 3,588 units were identified as providing potential competition to the subject units, either as primary or secondary competition. Of the 16 properties, two are older buildings which have been renovated and are located within downtown Arlington Heights with three projects located in downtown Des Plaines. Currently, there are no Class A apartment projects in downtown Mt Prospect. A summary of the data is presented on the following pages. it Proposed Maple Street Lofts Existing Mount Prospect Rental Apartments © 2018 Integra Realty Resources - Chicago Quoted Net Name Address City Units Avg SF Quality Built Rent PSF Rent PSF Occup The Element 1550 West Dempster Street Mount Prospect 509 956 C 1966 $1.29 $1.29 97.4% H untington Square 1300 South Elmhurst Road Mount Prospect 324 867 C 1975 $1.54 $1.54 98.5% The Colony 475 Enterprise Drive Mount Prospect 783 715 C 1973 $1.63 $1.63 96.8% Park Grove 1821 West Golf Road Mount Prospect 512 926 C 1978 $1.33 $1.33 97.1% The Residences of 1450 1450 South Busse Road Mount Prospect 222 792 C 1965 $1.27 $1.21 91.9% Forest Cove 1706 Forest Cove Drive Mount Prospect 300 832 C 1975 $1.51 $1.46 92.3% Thus, these buildings are significantly inferior to the new luxury rental apartments which are being proposed for development on the subject site. Rather than competing with the existing, modest Class C rental supply in Mount Prospect, the competition for the subject property will be spread out geographically. The subject will compete with other rental apartment developments also located within the Northwest Cook submarket with primary competition from the new 20 West Apartments which are under construction. We focused on properties located in adjoining suburbs and placed particular weight on properties which offer a similar type of downtown location. At the present time, this is not available in many northwest suburbs, but apartment buildings have been developed in downtown locations in Glenview, Des Plaines, and Park Ridge with one under construction currently in Mt Prospect. Sixteen large apartment properties comprising of 3,588 units were identified as providing potential competition to the subject units, either as primary or secondary competition. Of the 16 properties, two are older buildings which have been renovated and are located within downtown Arlington Heights with three projects located in downtown Des Plaines. Currently, there are no Class A apartment projects in downtown Mt Prospect. A summary of the data is presented on the following pages. it Proposed Maple Street Lofts O U c O U f0 E E Ln 41 a w it Q Q Q Q Q o N 3 00 l0 M cn cn I� l0 al r., N cn cn O O v l0 l0 L_ N N rl Ln 94 M� N N CD �n M a) 0)— — a) a) a) rn a) 0)— — a) 0) *' s C: C: C: C: O un un O O O un a� txo Mo v m Ln Lr) �n Lr) Lr) O O �n 's' m Ln O '-'•' N Lr) 11' N �n '1' � r- � � Lr) � � lD r, U i N N O M N0 N Lr) � M 01 I� N N r -I r%% 00 N rl lD 00 00 14:�: O N N Cl 0l rl In M lD Z a r -I N N rl rl rl rl N N N rl r -I N N N rl -(/)- l/)- -(h -(/� -(/� tf)- t/- -Ln V( -(. Vn - n- tn- -(!)- -tn to ca OC LL ca a N N O O Ln O 00 ern M a) 00 A N N r -I rl CSO 00 N r -I al al 00 Lr) O lzt N r -I N qt LO M 00 rl N N rl rl rl rl N N N (14 N N N N rl -1 c crO -U/ ih ih t4 t/) --(n -Ln-(h in -Ln -Ln tri -t/)- -kJ to -Ln O Q� O N00 LL N M Q0 OM r -I O O) ;:1-O�� qt M Ln qt m to N 00 O � M M(Z NM r -I CV O 00 M Ln r -,M l0 44.00N al 00 al r -I al al 00 al al al 00 a1 Q a) �o 00 qt 00 00 al rl I�t l;:j- Lr) lzt Lr) 00 Lr) � lD •� O 00 00 r -I r -I r -I O rl O r -I rl rl rl rl rl rl rl m Q 01 a) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r -I rl N N N fV N CN CSI N N N CV N N ('*4 i a N Q m m a a a a a a a a a a a a a a _m V +�•+ I� lD a) ::I -LD � It O r -I 00 al O I� N un O O co Ln r -Ir � O � m (Z ::J -CD 00 m m rn a) O r -I 00 OLn NN � CV N N rl r -I r -I N N [V M r -I r -I M Mn 4-J ate+ 4-J _I-_ bD = UO MO N cu 4A L - .- .- .- QJ Q) QJ QJ M -0 -0 .- ca fa fa '> _ '> •> •> V N i _ QC Q1 O O O (1)v v a a4-1 O ccco a a a (D0(D� u� O .- .- .- 0 0 0 .�� cn V) ._ 4-10 U 4- > ca a i.L � L L- L =3 0 � O i +, L O () > L a) CO a 0 CA N +'' Z > a }' V Q O O Z O ami w� DC N ri =.� U Z O Z M fa w O Z, ' N O O O u1 O -;t Ln m 00 Ln Ln M -;:j- Ln O O Ln O :Zj- r -I Ln Q0 m m m m Ln r -I O 00 Ln Q a Ln N M N r rl Ln r -I m rl N rl N l0 N E QJ V O L N CL m 4-j W ro CL i ii U ^' Wa4-1 te+ C: ? • �O cn ++ O J � L� cn ca (A - � a--+ O L � •> '� � cn O J m c O o_ }' E c - O N m � _v ( ca O U ai 0- U Q� 4J E4-J~00 _Ile iz � i Q .V Lf) ON M U41)O O a O O L N N c+-j Mo Ln -C=� a+ 0 - CL CL m =3 ca �� O 0)� CO O ;a O " ca Q Z 0 2 0 0 m � oC Q = a- Z Z 2 E 00 s O O U cli V) O Q O CL 4- 0 J a -J ai t� Q C6 R �M TE 4-J co a10�Mllllllll�lllml, Ln Ln Ln 1 1 ci A^� 00 s O O U cli V) O Q O CL 4- 0 J a -J ai t� Q C6 R �M TE 4-J co a10�Mllllllll�lllml, 00 s O O U cli V) O Q O CL 4- 0 J a -J ai t� Q C6 R Executive Summary and Conclusions 11 In comparing the average rents per square foot and average unit sizes, the range of data for these 16 properties is shown below: Market Survey -Avg, Price PSF & Un"t, S,,F 60, 1,00"D 1,200, 1,4010f 1, °00 Subject projections shown in red The Subject Property - Unit Mix We were not provided with a proposed unit mix or interior layouts with this assignment. Thus, we are not able to refine our conclusions relative to the functional appeal of the individual unit layouts. However, we have been provided with a preliminary mix of unit types which includes 43 studios averaging 550 SF, 164 one bedrooms averaging 770 SF, and 50 two bedrooms averaging 1,050 SF. Of particular note is the growing trend towards more compact, efficient units as the demand for small unit types is especially strong and these units are very popular with renters in the market. With subject's proposed mix, the property will have an average unit size of 788 SF. As evident from the survey of the competition, this average unit size is smaller than all of its competition resulting from both some smaller unit sizes and a mix of units with a higher proportion of studio units. Half of the comparables offer a studio/convertible unit type. These unit types are extremely marketable units typically exhibiting strong occupancy and demand. The sizes of studios at One Arlington are larger than typical due to the adaptive reuse design of the building. Thus, some of these units are as large as one -bedroom units in the market. The layouts are more of a convertible design with a separate sleeping area but lacking a door. The studio/convertible layout would appeal to primarily singles. These units would rent at a lower chunk rent compared to a one bedroom but still offer some privacy with a separate sleeping area. For the subject, we also suggest including a convertible layout. This layout would include a separate sleeping area and possibly a closet but no door. This room does not necessarily have to be along a window wall. With few existing developments offering studio units and given the subject property's downtown location, this will be an excellent product type for inclusion in the project. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions 12 64% of the unit mix at the competitive developments consists of one -bedroom layouts. One -bedroom layouts typically consist of the largest component of the unit mix. These layouts appeal to both singles and couples and don't carry the higher chunk price of the two-bedroom layout yet offer more privacy than a convertible or studio layout. Several of the comparables include one -bedroom plus den layouts. These layouts work well for tenants who desire a home office and do not need a full second bedroom. However, there tends to be lesser market demand for one bedroom plus den units, as they frequently become too close in size to two bedroom units but lack the utility of a two bedroom units. No one bedroom plus den units are being proposed at the subject development. Similar to the one -bedroom layouts, all the comparables offer a two-bedroom layout. On average, the comparables report 35% two bedroom units with sizes generally ranging from 1,000 to 1,350 SF. A split bedroom layout can be extremely versatile. We expect these units will appeal to singles, couples, divorced parents, and small families. All of the two bedroom units at the subject will contain two full baths and are reported to average approximately 1,050 SF. While there are a few developments in the market that include two bedroom plus den units, none are being proposed for the subject property. We note that two of the five developments offering this layout were originally designed as condominium buildings. Half of the comparables include three-bedroom layouts. These layouts range from about 1,300 SF to 2,300 SF. The largest units are at Kingston Pointe which was originally designed as a condominium building and Deer Park Crossing and Northgate Crossing which include three-bedroom townhouse units. The other properties offer unit sizes from 1,385 SF to 1,786 SF. None are being proposed for the subject property. Subject Property - Unit Finishes and Building Amenities A list of proposed unit finishes was not provided with this assignment. We assume that the unit finishes will be consistent with the developer's Buckingham Place project in Des Plaines and will meet the expectation of tenants seeking modern homes with the latest design and features. Unit finishes should include 9' ceiling heights, full-size washer/dryer, walk-in closets, balconies, and window treatments. The market has moved away from carpeting and instead is using vinyl plank flooring (engineered hardwood used occasionally and only in higher end properties). Kitchens should be equipped with attractive cabinets, granite or quartz counters, full -height backsplash, and good quality stainless steel appliances. Gas cooktops are preferred in the market rather than electric. Bathrooms should have upgraded ceramic tile/stone floor and tub/shower surrounds with contemporary finishes. With a two building design and a total of 257 units, the subject property has been designed with extensive amenities. Thus, it will feature all of the standard feature found in the new, Luxury Class A suburban developments. • The second floor amenities in Building A include the following: it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions 13 o Enclosed amenity space on the second floor overlooking the outdoor deck — while this has not been designed, it assumed that it will include a fitness center, club rooms, business center/co-working area, etc. o Outdoor amenity space including hot tub, outdoor swimming pool, cabanas, pergola and seating areas, fire table and lounge seating, outdoor kitchen, and recreational areas. • We suggest a small number of storage lockers although this is a less important amenity. However, these units are particularly popular with persons who are down -sizing from larger residences. Typically, these spaces rent for $25 to $35 per month. • Pets have become extremely important and we are seeing an increasing number of dogs in rental apartment buildings. A dog walk area is a popular amenity as is a dog spa where residents can wash their pets. • With people shopping extensively on line, it is becoming very challenging for buildings to handle packages. There are package rooms and package systems such as Luxur and Amazon which can be utilized, as the number of package deliveries continues to grow. • A bike storage area is also useful and planned for the development. Parking Amenities With its suburban location, it is expected that there will be strong demand for parking on site, with each residential unit expected to have at least one enclosed parking garage space available for rent within the same building. We understand that the parking amenities will be primarily enclosed garage parking with some additional surface spaces also available. The Subject Property - Recommended Rents (average) Based upon an analysis of the subject location and overall development scheme, we believe that rental apartment units will be marketable at this location. While we have not been provided with unit layouts or specifics regarding the variety of units within each type category, we have estimated general rent ranges for the units as follows: Projected Rents (Current dollars) Total SF Unit Type Bldg A Bldg D Total % Avg SF Bldg A Bldg D Total Est. Rent Total Rent Rent PSF Studio 38 5 43 17% 550 20,900 2,750 23,650 $1,550 $66,650 $2.82 11311 124 40 164 64% 770 95,480 30,800 126,280 $1,850 $303,400 $2.40 21311 30 20 50 19% 1,050 31,500 21,000 52,500 $2,350 $117,500 $2.24 31311 0 0 0 0% Total Units 192 65 257 100% 147,880 54,550 2021430 $1,897 $487,550 $2.41 Avg Unit SF 770 839 788 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions 14 With an enclosed parking ratio of 1.2:1, we have projected monthly parking fees of approximately $75 per space. The developer is projecting to begin construction in the spring of 2019 with the first occupancies in the summer of 2020. It is also assumed that the utility charges will be paid by the residents, as is typical of newer properties in the overall market. We expect that rents will increase and have estimated an annual rate of about 2% per year. The Subject Property - Estimated Absorption As is typical of lease -up programs, lease -up can occur with a large spurt of activity at the beginning of the program, particularly if it is timed for the spring and summer leasing season, with the pace slowing as the program continues. In the Chicago MSA market, very little leasing activity takes place between November and February and the bulk of this winter activity is generated by need -based moves. In fact, most owners do not like to have leases come due during this winter period due to the lack of potential renter traffic at this time of year. The subject units will be facing increasing competition in the overall market area as there are several projects which are under construction in communities such as Mount Prospect, Des Plaines, and Wheeling. In addition, there is a growing pipeline of proposed projects which have not yet broken ground but which are in varying stages of the entitlement, design, and financing process. Thus, we expect that the market will be more competitive when the subject begins offering units for occupancy. Integra Realty Resources — Chicago has been surveying the lease -up pace in all of the new suburban apartment projects in the Chicago MSA. The detailed information is shown later in this report. Overall, since 2013, projects have been leasing up an average pace of 12 units per month. With a two building configuration, it is likely that the buildings will be phased. Overall, we are projecting a lease - up of the property within approximately two years which is consistent with the lease -up of other buildings in the market. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions Maps and Site Plans Surrounding Area Map IN&I.-III �010 D7 ysta� Lake c f u,,;a pI uP:�v. L.,dkr',e, ZI u r ic 1,-i V Algonquir'i Buffalo f", B a rr� i �-i g't oi-i� 11 , " r I "JI43 rli�" I I rs�,d I li;o N o rit Ii b ro o k 'hmftwat qw, 'W&st Dundee A r I'i t, Gr cojr, krlbffi �ir-ia,,nw ............. e �ri 'v j e:'%v ' fthwadl, Eva- t'i �,-.';,Ilo ri, El gin 1'73" c zii, u L':� u r g [)'es l:�, I k G ro v e r Sm i,,' [-i E fl�,i rrr a q,k R o seii'7�,', ol, ri i", All Ir St. dara l S"it"r &,�m lr'i� E I ijnr7i 411111111,1,1', ri,1531-tl G e ri,e v a L o E) rd w Oak Park Chlcqq ag�o B,,,i, �t ii, �i a G a k 'E3 ro-o k . . ....... . ..... . ....... . . Dk. i �-Y r filwallifilm"at I'D lr)''Yv i �'E' r (3 III filwaimag 1'0"�'ufte A. r, rm) r ii�ai plyi d 10 Napee,rv"'Ile him, lu Mc,,orrll� or nery, IV Oa k L a w t'(i 15 irr Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions Location Map Dell-orme Street Atlas USA 2012' Data use SUbject to liciense.. DeLrorme- DeLorme Str,ee,t Atlas USAS 20,1 2. 0 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 Mm-delorme-com IVIN (4.0- W), Data Zoom 13 - 16 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions 17 Aerial View of Site it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions Townhomes located to the west of subject (Photos Taken in View north across the train tracks View to the west from subject 18 Lions Park located south of the townhouse parcel View along Prospect Avenue at the north end of the subject site View of older single family residences to the south it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions Site Plan — (Designed by the Lakota Group) , ,. ,, , $. (MMP LE ST. (Note: The rowhomes are not part of this assignment) 19 PLAN HIGHLIGHT'S S S 11Y APARTMENT * In units * 4145 garage S 36 swmlacue spaces * 14,14S 'SF of retail PRIVATE ROADS, * Elm Street * Dawson Drive PUBLIC PARYLING DECK * 3•stq deck * 46total Iparking WKe5 5 -STORY I,RTMIEHP *65 units -ISS internal spaces ( stories) *21 surface spades ROWHO,MES * 13 (Front Load (S2' s a swk0/dlui) * 43 iRear Lcad tlevg sir sv, u ) TOTAL AREA 6,:51 AC RESIDENTIAL 176 AC MIIJNICIPAL, m 11.55 AC to match dowwwwtpwwn IYgtds W *Slternherg onnNdastfYamlLYght, to match dowdowwn lights -Wall s=Ke an I . Mng deck �w it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction V Ao', i, , ,. ,, , $. (MMP LE ST. (Note: The rowhomes are not part of this assignment) 19 PLAN HIGHLIGHT'S S S 11Y APARTMENT * In units * 4145 garage S 36 swmlacue spaces * 14,14S 'SF of retail PRIVATE ROADS, * Elm Street * Dawson Drive PUBLIC PARYLING DECK * 3•stq deck * 46total Iparking WKe5 5 -STORY I,RTMIEHP *65 units -ISS internal spaces ( stories) *21 surface spades ROWHO,MES * 13 (Front Load (S2' s a swk0/dlui) * 43 iRear Lcad tlevg sir sv, u ) TOTAL AREA 6,:51 AC RESIDENTIAL 176 AC MIIJNICIPAL, m 11.55 AC to match dowwwwtpwwn IYgtds W *Slternherg onnNdastfYamlLYght, to match dowdowwn lights -Wall s=Ke an I . Mng deck �w it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions Outdoor Amenity Space 0VT FRE rxk�',Aw a A, j` al J0� UPKfi- T RRACEVITH OUTDOOR SOTM 6 p .................. ROADWYLIGHT.'TV mow. r BEXCHTYP. LANDSCAK`P!_ANTU� Art 40WER 4XVE4,-1, N l� CTE OINCRE WAM ACOM PrKsrom�,cHr rmL.,� CtW$J�D PLMTERMTH, SOFW,44w TOM, MY'KANTERA JYTERA, YP, jt UOVAKC "'A f AmvvAt pt,44row Z 5r� A T W, ParrPITY4 $CmRTVReART� SPECIA 4 r�" �AVERS A WSAIMOV PZROMA WITH OUTDOOR`,, LA RA FEW 44 -LD KA�7r, J/ PRIVATE PATOO WITH ORNAWNTAL FENCE PWQ POWTME'S �06 Tffi,S - �3` WTAWC. RMSED P"JYTER P= 4OUN" CHURS I - WAU XONCETYP . ................. POtMATION �ANVSCAPZ TYR . . . ........ - 20 irr Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction z A, 4", 'c" 4", A, 11 41, WAU XONCETYP . ................. POtMATION �ANVSCAPZ TYR . . . ........ - 20 irr Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions Building A Floor Plans Drawings by Studio 222 Architects were provided with this assignment. However, the plans for the development continue to be revised as modifications are made to the development. 21 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Executive Summary and Conclusions Building D — FLON , H�"S FUNK (� )'�HC FLUIN MWARCHITECTS 22 Vi 1� 0�1 LBa RAMING 2qzz SF J L ----J L__ --J L ----J ILL MAPLE STRIEFTILOFTS - BUR -DING F) N It C�140L AS MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINGIS notil J41,12018, i8a,14 HIIIi irr Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Market area defined. The Suburban Chicago market is defined as including Cook, Lake, McHenry, Kane, Kendall, DuPage and Will counties. Properties located within the city of Chicago are of course excluded from the survey. 23 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 24 Survey property profile. The database for the Suburban Chicago survey includes 300+ complexes with a total of just under 100,000 dwelling units indicating an average development size of just over 300 units. Our survey includes virtually every major apartment community developed since 1995 plus older developments (primarily post -1970) throughout the MSA. The data was gathered by direct contact with on-site staff and/or ownership. Rent Trends & Concessions. Median net rent per square foot is at $1.46 which is up 1.1 percent from a year ago and accompanied by a rise in occupancy. One bedroom units have a median net rent of $1,223 per month while two bedrooms are at $1,412. Compared to two years ago, net rent growth has amounted to a positive 5.6 percent. We expect rent growth to be flat in the near term due to the softening job market, particularly in the suburbs. Concessions are a marketing tool used to react to current demand without the need for continually adjusting "market" rents. The percent of complexes offering concessions is roughly 30 which is fairly steady to slightly rising over the last several quarters. The amount of the concession, currently offered at just under one month per lease year, has been relatively flat. Concessions are expected to remain in the market over the next year. Occupancy. Physical occupancy is at 95.8 percent for the entire market — up 30 bps from a year ago but down 40 bps from two years ago. At 95+ percent occupancy, the suburban market overall is considered "full" indicating pricing has the potential to rise but is mitigated by the weakening job market. We expect occupancy to remain steady in the near term. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 25 Market Revenue Performance. Market revenue performance is a function of the product of net rent and occupancy. 1.50 1.40 Market Revenue Performance Net Rent PSF x Occupancy (c) 2018 Integra Realty Resources 1.00 0.90 W M M O O r1 T--1 N N M M q* RCT Ln M W O I1% I*-. W W O O O rl rl rl rl a a a a a a a a a a a a crCr crCr M r1 M M M M M rl M T-4 M M V-4 M M Market revenue performance for the overall suburban market remains strong. The modest downward trends in the last quarters of the year are seasonal. New construction/Communities in Lease -up. There are a number of projects under construction throughout the MSA. Details are presented in the Housing Supply section. Several of the projects we are tracking are mid -rise buildings on in -fill sites rather than traditional walk up complexes. These have been favored in redeveloping downtown areas where transit -oriented development is needed but the all -in costs of construction at over $300 per square foot or $300,000+ per unit (wrap product) require fairly high rent levels for project feasibility. Walk up product cost is in the $125,000-$135,000 per unit range (not including soft costs or land). In response to the inability to add new product to the market, owners are undertaking renovation projects in order to capitalize on demand for higher end product. Renovations often include replacing cabinetry, counters, fixtures and floor coverings. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 26 AH,,, SuburbanApart, m,,,,,,,e,n,,ts - 3q IS f �Ee:d:lan s 138 1.39 1.44 U5 11,45 1.44 1.45 1,47 1.46 .'k z M edJai 6-1 95.3 945, 95.5, 1 95.4951 95.E 95,6 95,.fl C ��I I - .7% when, offered 6 e, d I a in % 77 7.7 77 7.7 Snapshot & Trends Suburban, Metro Cotrnplexes 331 Units 991,295 S,uff 910 Yr udt 198,6 VPSF $1,46 Ocau 95.8% aV PO WIconcessions 32.6% C'o,n i n r m 7^l7% d One rt $11,223 TING, B d f P' l $ 1( � MI 2 it r it All $rdt�4 .......................................................................................................................... ........ . 1 1,240 1$1220 $1 1, v 1180 11 160 $1,1140 1 , 1120 11$11, 100 $1I 080 V 1, uu 3ql Il 11 ;17 2,q 17 3q 17 4q 17 l Medians 11,142 1,13510 1,209 1,188 1,180, 1, 19"1 1I2 2 Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 27 Performance by Property Class The suburban survey dataset includes has the following characteristics: Class A Class B Class C Distribution (units) 27% 34% 39% Median Year Built 2010 1987 1972 Median Unit Size (sf) 979 882 839 Average Complex Size 250 341 311 Property Classes are generally defined as follow: Class A - Newer properties that have generally been constructed since the early 1990s. Amenities often include open layout floor plans, 9 foot ceilings, in -unit washer and dryer, high quality cabinetry and potentially granite counters and stainless steel appliances. Some communities have direct entry garages. The complex typically has a clubhouse, fitness center and swimming pool. Class B - Typically constructed in the 1980s but may include older product that has been significantly renovated. Amenities often include open layout floor plans, 8 foot ceilings, in -unit washer and dryer, good quality cabinetry and laminate counters. The complex typically has a clubhouse, fitness center and swimming pool. Class C - Typically constructed in the 1970s with limited renovations, if any. Units typically have older style floor plans (such as galley style, closed kitchens), average quality cabinetry and laminate counters. The complex may have a clubhouse and swimming pool but the quality is generally average. Laundry facilities are typically limited to a laundry room in the complex. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market $1.80 $1.70 $1.60 $1.50 a $1.40 a $1.30 cc $1.20 Z $1.10 $1.00 $0.90 $0.80 Net Rent by Property Class S rl M �- q M �- 4 M V- 4 M V- 4 M �- 4 M V- 4 M V- 4 M �- 4 M V- 4 M �- 4 M �- q M �- q M �- q M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LA I.A %6 k6 I� 1� 06 06 01 Q1 O O rl V4 N N M M 4 4 Ui LA %6 k6 I; I� 06 06 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 28 There was a clear bifurcation in performance by property class in 2010 with gains in net rent achieved primarily in the Class A and B markets while Class C properties lagged. The Class C market turned in 2011 with product gaining momentum primarily due to the rising cost of A and B product. On a year over year basis, rents psf increased 0.2%, 0.3% and 1.2% for A, B and C product respectively. The monthly "chunk" rent spread is shown below. Class A product chunk pricing averages a 26.6% premium over B and B product is 17.4% over C. $1,600 -w $1,400 Monthly Rent by Property Class 2$1,0000 5600 FA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m m lfl l0 I� r� 00 00 0 1 0 1 0 0 rl r4 N N M M 4 4 �A LA O O N^ 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 29 After tracking fairly consistent for years, a 100 basis point spread in occupancy between A/B versus C product emerged in 2010 and continued through 2813. Starting in 3813 the spread moved back to traditional patterns. The 4Q17 results show a widening in the market. Occupancy for all classes typically declines in the fourth quarter due to seasonality of the rental market. The recent slide for Class A product is due to additions to supply in several markets. 98.0% 96.0% Occupancy by Property Class Class C, 96.42% Class B. 090.0% 88.0% 86.0% � M � M M � M � M � M � M � M � M � M � M � M � M T-- 6 M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 6 C� 1` 1` 00 Cd O 6 O O r r N N M M 4 4 6 6 C6 6 I` I` 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T- � � � � � � � � � � V- � 'T" T" T" T r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N The following trends by submarket are based on our quarterly survey of just under 100,000 units. Detailed analysis of the data is contained within the submarket reports. i" Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 30 Net Rent PSF by Submarket Submarket 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 Y/Y Chnq 2 Yr Chng Cook NW $1.35 $1.36 $1.38 $1.41 $1.43 $1.41 $1.46 $1.49 $1.46 $1.46 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.52 $1.52 1.4% 4.0% Cook South $1.20 $1.21 $1.21 $1.23 $1.23 $1.19 $1.22 $1.27 $1.27 $1.25 $1.29 $1.30 $1.30 $1.29 $1.31 $1.35 $1.34 3.2% 6.1% DuPage $1.25 $1.28 $1.31 $1.32 $1.31 $1.31 $1.34 $1.37 $1.37 $1.36 $1.40 $1.42 $1.38 $1.41 $1.44 $1.43 $1.45 4.9% 6.1% Kane/Kendall $1.17 $1.18 $1.20 $1.22 $1.22 $1.23 $1.26 $1.27 $1.29 $1.27 $1.29 $1.29 $1.30 $1.26 $1.32 $1.34 $1.32 1.6% 2.3% La ke $1.39 $1.36 $1.40 $1.49 $1.46 $1.45 $1.44 $1.48 $1.47 $1.43 $1.48 $1.54 $1.53 $1.52 $1.56 $1.56 $1.57 3.1% 7.3% McHenry $1.01 $1.04 $1.08 $1.08 $1.07 $1.09 $1.12 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 $1.14 $1.14 $1.19 $1.19 5.4% 5.7% Naperville/Aurora $1.29 $1.30 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35 $1.38 $1.41 $1.44 $1.41 $1.43 $1.47 $1.47 $1.49 $1.46 $1.43 $1.46 $1.48 -0.8% 5.2% North Shore $2.19 $2.19 $2.16 $2.16 $2.17 $2.13 $2.18 $2.19 $2.27 $2.22 $2.20 $2.40 $2.31 $2.20 $2.23 $2.25 $2.24 -2.8% -1.2% Waukegan/Gurnee $1.09 $1.05 $1.05 $1.04 $1.07 $1.06 $1.10 $1.12 $1.12 $1.09 $1.11 $1.15 $1.16 $1.17 $1.18 $1.18 $1.17 0.8% 4.5% Will $1.15 $1.20 $1.22 $1.25 $1.27 $1.20 $1.23 $1.23 $1.28 $1.28 $1.30 $1.34 $1.32 $1.35 $1.40 $1.39 $1.35 2.7% 5.4% All Suburban 1 $1.27 $1.29 $1.32 $1.34 $1.33 $1.34 $1.39 $1.41 $1.38 $1.39 $1.44 $1.45 $1.45 $1.44 $1.45 $1.47 $1.46 1.1% 5.6% ►vore: wuarreny net rent va►ues are rounaea Tor a►sp►ay purposes o ur not Tor rrr rr Lnange ca►cu►ar►ons. One Bedroom Median Rent by Submarket Submarket 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 Y/Y Chna 2 Yr Chnq Cook NW $1,093 $1,098 $1,125 $1,131 $1,127 $1,131 $1,183 $1,207 $1,150 $1,187 $1,211 $1,212 $1,191 $1,180 $1,176 $1,200 $1,198 0.6% 4.1% Cook South $877 $872 $893 $908 $908 $919 $930 $1,010 $990 $955 $978 $1,006 $1,044 $1,034 $1,060 $1,082 $1,018 -2.6% 2.8% DuPage $1,027 $1,013 $1,039 $1,059 $1,037 $1,036 $1,089 $1,105 $1,100 $1,086 $1,111 $1,148 $1,124 $1,146 $1,180 $1,158 $1,191 5.9% 8.3% Kane/Kendall $908 $930 $908 $885 $885 $910 $967 $930 $942 $949 $1,000 $981 $981 $965 $981 $1,050 $1,050 7.0% 11.5% Lake $1,177 $1,155 $1,142 $1,153 $1,134 $1,143 $1,148 $1,199 $1,182 $1,115 $1,176 $1,273 $1,244 $1,187 $1,200 $1,291 $1,295 4.1% 9.6% McHenry $794 $818 $831 $835 $835 $866 $877 $885 $885 $885 $884 $874 $890 $884 $871 $929 $931 4.6% 5.2% Naperville/Aurora $1,123 $1,151 $1,162 $1,203 $1,203 $1,188 $1,251 $1,249 $1,240 $1,259 $1,252 $1,283 $1,320 $1,289 $1,258 $1,298 $1,280 -3.0% 3.2% North Shore $1,752 $1,725 $1,782 $1,776 $1,728 $1,701 $1,754 $1,842 $1,858 $1,828 $1,799 $1,922 $1,894 $1,830 $1,832 $1,891 $1,894 0.0% 1.9% Waukegan/Gurnee $843 $839 $854 $812 $825 $823 $820 $845 $812 $790 $798 $810 $825 $845 $845 $845 $834 1.1% 2.7% Will $887 $970 $935 $978 $993 $965 $1,015 $1,015 $1,035 $1,008 $1,050 $1,050 $1,050 $1,050 $1,050 $1,095 $1,095 4.3% 5.8% All Suburban $1,040 $1,049 $1,085 $1,104 $1,100 $1,084 $1,131 $1,162 $1,142 $1,135 $1,188 $1,209 $1,185 $1,180 $1,191 $1,229 $1,223 3.1% 7.1% Note: Quarterly net rent values are rounded for display purposes b ut not for Yr/Yr Change calculations. Two Bedroom Median Rent by Submarket Submarket 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3015 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3016 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3018 Y/Y Chna 2 Yr Chna Cook NW $1,275 $1,278 $1,334 $1,343 $1,340 $1,348 $1,394 $1,408 $1,375 $1,390 $1,419 $1,446 $1,400 $1,414 $1,385 $1,422 $1,414 1.0% 2.8% Cook South $1,148 $1,148 $1,158 $1,168 $1,168 $1,168 $1,193 $1,210 $1,210 $1,202 $1,278 $1,279 $1,280 $1,280 $1,248 $1,325 $1,315 2.7% 8.7% DuPage $1,230 $1,278 $1,293 $1,278 $1,309 $1,305 $1,340 $1,374 $1,355 $1,315 $1,385 $1,430 $1,396 $1,378 $1,438 $1,410 $1,400 0.3% 3.3% Kane/Kendall $1,116 $1,184 $1,185 $1,225 $1,250 $1,183 $1,270 $1,363 $1,246 $1,246 $1,288 $1,345 $1,337 $1,321 $1,369 $1,440 $1,341 0.3% 7.6% La ke $1,308 $1,416 $1,292 $1,441 $1,405 $1,406 $1,420 $1,412 $1,381 $1,396 $1,404 $1,441 $1,466 $1,418 $1,475 $1,530 $1,575 7.5% 14.1% McHenry $963 $942 $958 $980 $980 $988 $1,010 $1,003 $990 $995 $1,010 $1,025 $1,038 $1,020 $1,010 $1,048 $1,048 1.0% 5.8% Naperville/Aurora $1,321 $1,330 $1,389 $1,408 $1,407 $1,418 $1,429 $1,445 $1,432 $1,435 $1,479 $1,491 $1,516 $1,495 $1,496 $1,496 $1,475 -2.7% 3.0% North Shore $2,405 $2,518 $2,603 $2,625 $2,522 $2,441 $2,603 $2,533 $2,481 $2,446 $2,465 $2,675 $2,623 $2,623 $2,540 $2,447 $2,478 -5.5% -0.2% Waukegan/Gurnee $1,007 $1,015 $988 $990 $988 $1,003 $1,008 $1,035 $1,040 $1,000 $1,030 $1,063 $1,084 $1,090 $1,045 $1,050 $1,042 -3.8% 0.2% Will $993 $1,034 $1,080 $1,099 $1,155 $1,099 $1,125 $1,116 $1,180 $1,185 $1,200 $1,206 $1,181 $1,258 $1,296 $1,279 $1,285 8.9% 8.9% All Suburban $1,230 $1,261 $1,306 $1,318 $1,321 $1,314 $1,364 $1,368 $1,355 $1,357 $1,400 $1,432 $1,407 $1,395 $1,413 $1,433 $1,412 0.3% 4.2% ►vore: wuarreny net rent va►ues are rounaea Tor a►sp►ay purposes o ur nor Tor tri Yr L nange ca►cu►ar►ons. Rent Spread - 1 B to 2BR Submarket 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 Ava1vr Ava2vr Cook NW $183 $181 $209 $212 $213 $216 $211 $201 $225 $203 $208 $235 $210 $234 $209 $222 $217 3.4% -3.7% Cook South $271 $276 $265 $260 $260 $249 $263 $201 $221 $247 $300 $273 $236 $246 $188 $243 $298 26.2% 34.9% DuPage $203 $265 $253 $219 $272 $269 $251 $269 $255 $229 $275 $283 $271 $232 $258 $253 $209 -22.9% -18.1% Kane/Kendall $209 $254 $278 $340 $365 $273 $303 $433 $305 $297 $288 $364 $356 $356 $387 $390 $291 -18.2% -4.5% Lake $131 $261 $150 $288 $271 $264 $272 $214 $199 $281 $229 $169 $222 $231 $275 $239 $280 26.4% 40.9% McHenry $169 $125 $127 $145 $145 $122 $133 $118 $105 $110 $126 $151 $148 $136 $139 $119 $116 -21.2% 10.7% Naperville/Aurora $198 $179 $227 $205 $205 $230 $178 $196 $192 $176 $228 $208 $196 $206 $238 $198 $195 -0.6% 1.9% North Shore $654 $793 $820 $849 $794 $740 $849 $691 $623 $618 $667 $753 $728 $793 $708 $555 $583 -19.9% -6.4% Waukegan/Gurnee $163 $177 $134 $178 $163 $180 $188 $190 $228 $210 $232 $253 $259 $245 $200 $205 $208 -19.5% -8.6% Will $106 $64 $145 $122 $163 $134 $110 $101 $145 $178 $150 $156 $131 $208 $246 $184 $190 45.7% 31.3% All Suburban 1 $190 $212 $221 $215 $221 $230 $234 $206 $214 $222 $212 $224 $222 $215 $221 $203 $190 -14.7% -11.2% Lo zu7 is ►nregra Keary Kesources - c;n►cago it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 31 Occupancy by Submarket Submarket 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 Y/Y Chnq 2 Yr Chnq Cook NW 96.6 95.8 96.9 96.9 97.3 95.1 96.0 97.2 96.0 95.4 94.1 95.2 95.3 95.4 94.6 94.5 95.3 0.0% -0.7% Cook South 95.3 95.0 95.1 96.4 96.5 95.5 96.1 96.9 96.9 95.9 94.9 95.8 96.3 95.7 94.2 95.4 95.9 -0.4% -1.0% D u Pa g e 95.8 95.3 96.1 96.3 96.6 95.3 96.7 97.2 96.1 95.7 94.4 95.4 95.5 95.1 95.0 95.1 95.8 0.2% -0.3% Kane/Ke n d a I I I 95.2 95.0 96.3 95.7 95.8 96.0 96.7 97.6 96.4 95.2 95.1 96.2 96.1 95.3 96.3 96.9 97.1 1.1% 0.8% La ke 96.9 96.9 97.7 98.3 98.0 96.6 97.0 97.5 96.9 95.5 95.0 95.5 95.3 95.8 96.4 96.0 96.7 1.4% -0.3% McHenry 95.3 95.3 96.1 96.4 96.1 95.4 96.2 97.9 96.1 95.6 93.9 95.1 96.4 94.8 95.9 93.9 96.0 -0.5% -0.2% Naperville/Aurora 96.0 96.1 97.1 97.6 96.9 96.0 96.4 97.1 95.1 95.0 94.4 95.6 94.8 94.4 96.0 95.4 94.3 -0.5% -0.7% North Shore 94.8 95.3 96.8 96.4 96.1 94.2 95.4 95.7 95.4 93.8 92.9 94.6 93.8 91.9 92.7 95.2 94.8 1.0% -0.7% Waukegan/Gurnee 95.4 94.6 95.6 95.8 96.0 95.2 96.5 96.6 96.8 96.9 95.8 96.0 95.9 95.4 95.7 96.4 97.1 1.3% 0.4% Will 95.4 94.7 95.4 95.6 96.4 94.1 95.4 96.1 96.5 95.5 96.7 96.9 96.6 96.0 95.9 95.8 95.7 -0.9% -0.7% All Suburban 1 95.9 95.3 96.3 96.7 96.7 95.4 96.3 97.1 96.1 95.3 94.5 95.5 95.4 95.1 95.2 95.6 95.8 0.3% -0.4% /vote: vuarteny occupancy values are rounaea Tor cusp/ay purposes out not for YriYr unange calculations. Concessions by Submarket Submarket 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3015 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3017 4017 1Q18 2Q18 3018 Y/Y Chnq Cook NW 4.5 5.4 6.1 6.0 2.5 5.9 7.7 6.2 6.3 7.7 5.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.0 6.1 7.0 -9.5% Cook South 5.9 6.1 5.9 4.8 7.7 5.0 7.7 8.0 7.7 8.0 8.0 7.7 7.7 8.0 7.7 8.0 8.3 8.3% DuPage 8.3 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.0 8.3 7.7 7.7 7.7 6.7 8.3 8.0 7.7 8.0 8.3 0.0% Kane/Kendalll 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 6.7 7.7 8.3 4.7 8.3 7.7 7.0 7.7 7.7 -7.7% Lake 7.2 7.2 8.3 5.6 2.8 8.0 7.1 7.2 8.3 7.6 7.6 6.2 6.2 3.5 10.7 8.3 8.3 33.9% McHenry 6.2 5.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a Naperville/Aurora 1.7 8.6 4.2 7.5 8.0 5.5 3.5 4.3 6.0 8.3 3.2 6.3 5.4 6.9 8.3 8.3 8.3 54.6% North Shore 8.3 6.0 4.2 8.3 4.7 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.0 7.7 8.3 7.4 8.0 8.3 7.7 7.7 4.2% Waukegan/Gurnee 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.3 5.5 8.3 6.0 7.5 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.3 5.6 3.4 -58.5% Will 4.2 6.3 4.2 8.3 8.0 8.3 2.5 5.6 3.7 3.0 7.6 6.3 1.1 8.7 5.4 4.7 4.9 336.3% All Suburban 1 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.0 8.3 7.7 7.7 0.0% /voce: ►vumoers snown are percenrages - i monrn Tree renron iz monrn /ease equals zs.sro. © 2018 Integra Realty Resources - Chicago it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Demand Generators The apartment market is influenced by a number of factors including employment, homeownership trends and a desire to maintain flexibility. 32 The unemployment rate for the Chicago MSA is 4.0 percent (National, 3.9 percent) as of August 2018. The national unemployment rate for 25+ year olds with a bachelor's degree is at 2.1 percent. 14 12 0 a� 10 Chicago vs. National Unemployment Rate — BLS Data 2 0 00 3 Q1 3 O 3 rl 3 N 3 M 3 li* 3 Ln 3 l0 3 r% 3 00 3 f0 f6 f� fa f0 f6 f0 fa f� f6 f0 The Chicago market generated an annual average of 75,000 new jobs from 1992-2000 — a trough to peak period. Employment declined from 2000-2003 with peak post -recession employment achieved in 2007 which did not even match the 2000 employment level. The 2016 employment level of 4.684M finally eclipsed the prior 2000 total employment peak of 4.631M. By looking at the month over month comparisons to prior year employment, the trends in employment become more evident. The rate of growth in employment declined precipitously in 2016-2017 but more recently has improved. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Year over Year Employment Growth Chicago MSA 33 • W . . • • �t . .. 0 • • • 0 • r r BLS numbers indicate a deceleration in employment growth as follows: Chicago MSA Employment - Non Farm (000s) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Em pi Chg 2006 4397.8 4411.7 4445.1 4492.2 4529.9 4572.7 4544.3 4547.6 4553.9 4555.2 4570.3 4573.1 2007 4449.3 4447.5 4487.3 4529.2 4577.6 4610.6 4583.9 4584.5 4579.1 4588.4 4603.8 4601.7 37.425 2008 4470.2 4467.8 4488.1 4533.7 4572.9 4589.3 4563.5 4558.8 4536.4 4533.7 4511.4 4480.3 -28.067 2009 4313.2 4291.5 4283.1 4292.3 4317.7 4321.8 4280.9 4267.7 4265.4 4276.6 4278.0 4263.8 -237.842 2010 4136.8 4145.5 4166.6 4219.7 4274.4 4288.3 4245.4 4254.3 4263.5 4298.0 4310.1 4301.2 -45.683 2011 4181.2 4191.0 4222.4 4280.8 4313.8 4339.4 4324.2 4332.4 4346.7 4358.7 4372.3 4363.1 60.183 2012 4250.1 4261.5 4296.2 4343.4 4385.8 4417.8 4391.0 4403.6 4417.2 4427.3 4446.8 4441.0 71.308 2013 4313.7 4335.2 4363.9 4400.5 4457.0 4489.9 4462.5 4477.0 4480.8 4494.3 4511.5 4513.3 68.158 2014 4373.6 4387.8 4420.3 4474.4 4531.1 4560.6 4533.7 4541.9 4539.3 4568.7 4580.4 4583.5 66.308 2015 4448.4 4464.1 4492.7 4559.5 4618.5 4649.1 4629.7 4628.6 4629.4 4661.6 4667.4 4673.1 85.567 2016 4540.5 4550.0 4575.4 4634.5 4668.6 4703.2 4695.3 4692.4 4691.0 4712.5 4724.4 4715.1 65.067 2017 4583.7 4597.3 4631.8 4664.2 4714.9 4757.4 4722.5 4726.0 4724.0 4754.6 4758.6 4730.9 38.583 2018 4604.8 4632.0 4656.2 4695.1 4750.8 4800.9 4777.4 4766.3 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 34 Homeownership Trends Rental demand is being driven by instability in the for -sale housing market, the inability to obtain a mortgage due lack of down payment, debt to income ratios (including the impact of student loans) and/or credit issues. Homeownership rates throughout the region had been on a decline through year end 2011 but rose through 2013 — seemingly pointing to a turn in the market. With the Dodd Frank lending rules starting in January 2014, obtaining a loan has become even more difficult due to increased underwriting requirements. The 2018 tax reform has a positive impact on rental housing due to a) capping the real estate and income tax deductions at $10,000, b) eliminating interest deductions on home equity loans, c) increasing the exemption levels which eliminates the economic benefit of mortgage interest deductions for most households and d) reduction in the actual tax rates which decreases the value of deductions. In spite of these factors, homeownership spiked in 1Q18 as noted below. This appears to be an anomaly with a return to trend in 2Q18. Nationally, the homeownership rate showed a decline through mid -2016 with a more recent upward trend. Each percentage point change equates to roughly 30,000 households in the Chicago MSA. 71.0 70.0 69.0 68.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 63.0 62.0 61.0 60.0 Homeownership Rate — Chicago MSA N W W M M O O r -I r -I N N M M 44T 4* Ln Ln W W N N W W O O O O O M rl M r -I M r -I M r -I M r -I M r -I M r -I M r -I M r -I M r -I M r -I M The rental market is most heavily influenced by demographic trends in the 25-35 age cohort. This age group is less concerned about owning a home than maintaining flexibility for potential job-related moves. The prospect of tying up funds for a down payment on a home and then worrying about the ability to "cash out" for a move in a timely manner (not to mention getting whole relative to the initial it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 35 purchase) have weighed on the for -sale market. Renting provides options. While price levels of for sale product have been increasing, it has been overall at a modest rate. There has been pressure on interest rates which will motivate some to act on homeownership. There are few compelling reasons to act now on the purchase of a residence. From a household formation standpoint, there is pent up demand in the 25-34 year old cohort as many in this category remain living with parents. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Cook County —Northwest Apartment Submarket Overview Market area defined. The Cook County Northwest sub market is defined as roughly 294 to the east, Lake County on the north, Route 59 on the west and DuPage County to the south. O'Hare International Airport is at the southeastern most part of the submarket. Survey property profile. The database for the Cook County — Northwest survey consisted of 25,681 dwelling units. Median unit size for the submarket is 877 square feet which is in-line with the overall suburban market. The median year built was 1975 compared to the overall suburban market having a median of 1986. Cook County Northwest was one of the first submarkets to develop in suburban Chicago to a significant density. The lack of newer product has been more a function of 36 lack of suitable sites for development rather than submarket economics. Demand drivers. Significant housing demand is driven by the primary employment centers of O'Hare International Airport and its surrounding industrial base in the southeast quadrant, the Schaumburg office/retail market in the northwest and the 1-88 office corridor to the south. The office market remains plagued by high vacancy. Rent Trends & Concessions. Median net rent per square foot currently stands at $1.52 — up 1.4% from a year ago. Rents in the Northwest Cook submarket are up 4.0 percent compared to the levels posted two years ago. One -bedrooms have a median rent of $1,198 while two bedrooms have a median net rent of $1,414. The value of the concession stands at just under one month free rent. Concessions will remain in the market. Occupancy. Occupancy is flat over the past year with the current level at 95.3 percent. The submarket remains relatively "full" with pricing therefore expected to remain stable. Market Revenue Performance. Market performance is a function of the product of net rent and occupancy. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 1.50 1.40 X 1.30 a 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90 37 Market Revenue Performance Net Rent PSF x Occupancy (c) 2018 Integra Realty Resources W M M O O rl T-4 N N M M 41* 41* M M W W I*1% N W W O O O T-1 T- q V-4 V-4 T-1 V-1 V-4 W-4 W-1 a a a a a a a a a a a a Cr a Cf a CY C7 Cf a CY M T.4 M Suburban Overall Northwest Cook Cty The Northwest Cook submarket has been tracking consistent with the overall suburban market. Performance leveled off in 2016 with a modest gain through the current quarter. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Cook, Coun,ty-Nor,t;hwe,�st,,A,p�a,,rt�,,ments AV jiviWf, io atedia n trend fine and (A) milld" 213rel san)jowd Writ bit nr),- IRTMI'M W13m,lum EMedlans 146, 146, 1.50 1.50 1 1510 1,60 150 1.52, � 1,52 A7J J- I -W tt Z M edlain % 961D 95A 94-1 95-2 953 954 914,6 94.5 953] PT A, Al Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction 38 Net One Bildrim, - $ 1, 198"Imo e d Ilia n $ 'I, b5l) 1,18 7" 1,211 1,21 T21 1, 19 1 1180 1176, 11200 [ 1, 19"8 IRLT rV-- 'n 0 111 A -11 A MTN ll,"e A W 11W VM 101111 11 10 "I "I M I ll""v W M illu"P WW Ym I' W. 1, 11", Orr S,napshnot & Trends, Cook Cnity N'W I S"ui'burban Metro, 66 Complexas 331 25 681 IF Units 99295, P 877' $Flun# 910 1975 Ylill-Buill, 1986 1. 52 Not PSF $11.4 aIN '9 5.3% 1111111111301 Occupancy 9510,8% 1+ 34.8% Pct Wlconcessions 32.6% IM`11'131�11 7.0% Conce, ls,slo n A, m it '7.7% $1,198 One, 8 drrr?IMo $11223 $1 , 414 IF 4 Avo8draillMo $ 1,412 4, Net One Bildrim, - $ 1, 198"Imo e d Ilia n $ 'I, b5l) 1,18 7" 1,211 1,21 T21 1, 19 1 1180 1176, 11200 [ 1, 19"8 IRLT rV-- 'n 0 111 A -11 A MTN ll,"e A W 11W VM 101111 11 10 "I "I M I ll""v W M illu"P WW Ym I' W. 1, 11", Orr Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 39 Suburban Multi -Family Housing Supply Integra Realty Resources - Chicago has been tracking rental apartment construction on an annual basis since 1996. Since that time, 27,501 units (through 3Q 2018) have been delivered for an average of 11196 units per year. In addition, 4,185 units are currently under construction for deliveries in 2019+. 4'N 00, '4, ALNLN 3,50,0; N OGO 2,500 2,00 1,500 1,00"o, 50 011 Suburban Apartment Deliveries by year: 1996-2018. and 'Projects Currently UnderCanstruction () 2019 IInte,gra IReafty e oUrce - Chicago r��q...� �au 0) "4 D CD 'A --i CD CD 4,1K J) � CD CD CD ,per .. '4� * 4-i 77-1 r_1 '0. -'I Z,88,2 2,733 M r1J 2,831 2,395FIX. 2,494 0 ON i 2,086 O (/ 1,698 ,843 1,271j 1,100, 1,032 1,32 1,047 1,244 1N0 77/ j / i294 280 515 o �ti9.N ,INMEN of 2 010 112 85 60 , r��q...� �au 0) "4 D CD 'A --i CD CD *CD CD J) � CD CD CD ,per .. '4� * 4-i 77-1 r_1 '0. -'I T__ 1 M r1J u 0 �ti9.N Between 2004 and 2012, little product was added to the market. This was driven by a few factors including: • Poor economics due to job losses in the region creating vacancies and concessions, though performance has improved since late 2009 • Lower interest rate and low down payment environment driving demand for new condo unit construction which generated more immediate returns; however, the new construction condo market is now stalled. • Resistance of communities to allow for new rental developments • Few well located sites left in the region suitable for large scale development • Rent levels not high enough to support construction costs at locations where sites can be acquired With many communities welcoming rental development, combined with feasible rent levels supporting construction, development began occurring in 2013 throughout the region. Since that time, there has been a significant increase in the new apartment development activity. However, given the size of the suburban metropolitan area, the number of new apartments being added to the market is still quite small. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 40 History of Recent Deliveries: The most recent additions to the suburban market include the following buildings which delivered in 2016-2017 along with the developments which delivered in 2018 or are currently under construction. 2016-2017 Deliveries — Sorted by Year it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction © 2018 Integra Realty Resources - Chicago Property Submarket City Developer Status Units Delivered 500 Station Boulevard Aurora - Naperville Aurora Goel/TCCI Leasing 417 2016 Metro 59 Aurora - Naperville Aurora Next Gen/Avgeris Leasing 232 2016 Northgate Crossing Cook NW Wheeling Reva Stabilized 300 2016 Wheaton Courthouse Square Du Page Wheaton Focus Stabilized 149 2016 Elmhurst 255 Du Page Elmhurst Morningside Stabilized 192 2016 Apex 41 Du Page Lombard Glenstar Leasing 181 2016 Walnut Ridge McHenry Woodstock Cunat Stabilized 108 2016 The Main North Shore Evanston O'Donnell Stabilized 112 2016 Northshore 770 North Shore Northbrook Morningside Leasing 347 2016 Vantage Oak Park South Cook Oak Park LSI/Golub/Wood Stabilized 270 2016 Residences of Orland Park Crossing South Cook Orland Park Reva Stabilized 231 2016 Springs at Weber Will Romeoville Continental Properties Stabilized 292 2016 North 680 Cook NW Schaumburg UrbanStreet Stabilized 192 2017 The Residences at Hamilton Lakes Du Page Itasca M&R/Hamilton Leasing 297 2017 Springs at Orchard Rd Kane North Aurora Continental Properties Leasing 300 2017 Centrum Evanston/Davis & Maple North Shore Evanston Centrum Stabilized 101 2017 McGovern House North Shore Highland Park Merdinger Stabilized 73 2017 The Residences of Wilmette/611 Green Bay North Shore Wilmette M&R Leasing 75 2017 Uptown LaGrange South Cook LaGrange Opus Leasing 254 2017 The Emerson/Lake/Westgate/North South Cook Oak Park Clark Street/Lennar Leasing 271 2017 The Brook on Janes Will Bolingbrook Lennar Stabilized 280 2017 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 41 2018 Deliveries and Developments Under Construction Sorted by Construction Status © 2019 Integra Realty Resources - Chicago, All Rights Reserved Property Submarket City Developer Status Units Parkview Apts, 212 N. Dunton Cook NW Arlington Heights Cullen Davis Leasing 45 Buckingham PI a ce/Littel fuse site/800 E NW Hwy Cook NW Des PI a i nes Dearborn -Buckingham Leasing 270 Marq on Main/Main St& Burlington DuPage Lisle Marquette Leasing 201 EI a n Yorktown/Yorktown Ma I I DuPage Lomba rd Greysta r Leas i ng 295 Main & Maple DuPage Downers Grove Trammel Crow Leasing 115 Burlington Station DuPage Downers Grove Holladay Leasing 89 Springs at South EI gi n/Gyorr Rd & Sterns Ka ne-Kenda I I South Elgin Continental Properties Leasing 300 Reserve at Grengs Park Ka ne-Kenda I I Geneva Shodeen Leas i ng 84 Prairie Winds of St Charles/NS Bri cher Kane -Kendall St Charles Big Rock Leasing 250 Springs at Ca nterfi el d/ES Rt 31 N of 1-90 Ka ne-Kenda I I West Dundee Continental Properties Leasing 260 TheAtworth atMelody Farms/Milw&Town Ln Lake Vernon Hills Focus Leasing 260 444 Social/SWC Aptakisic & Pkwy/Regal site Lake Lincolnshire ECD/Greenberg Leasing 302 Deer Park Crossing/Field Pkwy La ke Deer Park Reva Lea s i ng 236 101 West/101 W Liberty St Lake Barrington Monroe Residential Leasing 64 Kel mscott Pa rk Apts/NWC La urel & Western North Shore Lake Forest Focus Leasing 111 2018 Deliveries in Lease -up 2,882 One Apts/Wheel i ng Town Center Cook NW Wheel i ng Lynma rk/Urban R2 Construction 301 Uptown 501/501 W Dundee Cook NW Wheeling DAC/Atlas Construction 321 Ellison Luxury Apts/Si m's Bowl/1555-65 EI I i nwood Cook NW Des Plaines Opus/Berkshire Construction 113 20West/ 20 W Northwest Why Cook NW Mt Prospect Nicholas & Assoc Construction 73 Covington Lexington Woods/Golf & E River Rd Cook NW Des Plaines Lexi ngton Construction 236 Overture Yorktown/Yorktown Mall (55+) DuPage Lombard Greystar Construction 175 Lakeside Village/200 Royce DuPage Oak Brook Terr Interforum Construction 315 NWC Addison & First DuPage Elmhurst Opus Construction 164 Prairie Centre Phase I/St Charles Mall Ka ne-Kenda I I St Cha rl es Shodeen Construction 96 Waterma rk at the Grove/WS Ra nda I I Ka ne-Kenda I I Elgin Interstate Partners Construction 282 SEC Harlem & South Blvd South Cook Oak Park Li ncol n Construction 250 NWC Lake & Forest South Cook Oak Park Albion Construction 265 811 Emerson North Shore Evanston CA & Focus Construction 242 Avi dor Glenview/650 Waukegan (55+age) North Shore Glenview Trammel Crow Construction 168 1450 Sherman North Shore Eva nston Albion Construction 286 1727 Oak (55+age) North Shore Eva nston Trammel Crow Construction 169 8000 North/NWC Lincoln & Oak North Shore Skokie Greens pi re/Ponta rel I i Construction 153 The Elaine/1000 Skokie Blvd/Sunset Ridge North Shore Northbrook Fi nger Construction 304 Grande ParkApts/SWC 127th & Ridge Will Plainfield Wilmette RE Construction 200 Highpoi nt Town Square Will Romeoville HPTS Construction 72 Under Construction 4,185 Deliveries by Submarket While the DuPage and Aurora/Naperville markets have experienced the largest amount of development since 1996, this occurred in the late 1990s/early 2000s. Since 2013, the North Shore submarket has seen the largest surge of activity. Of particular note is the small amount of new development activity which had occurred in the Northwest Cook submarket until very recently. This market has a high concentration of Class 6 and C buildings with pent up demand for Class A product and developers are now pursuing an increasing number of new developments in the Northwest Cook submarket. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Following is a delivery distribution by submarket for the developments which will have delivered through 2018, along with the buildings which are currently under construction/being delivered in 2Ol9+. Deliveries, �by Submarket, Since 1996 Lake Waukegan - �N Oft �h �K a �ne McHenry Narthwest �D, u �P a ge Aurora- Cook South W111 13 1996-2017 2, 019 Ej� 3,694 1,722 474 766, 5,832 1,521 42 irr Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction MM��iifiiiiiiiiffffffffffffffffffffffffffffjimsm u Ul) IPA M. (b V-1 rA MEN=, N MEN= N III "4 LO NN a r4 Nu L io ° v IVI S �L oil rnv �MONO" IIIIIIIIIIIIIII'- „ A (10 Lbm LolowU)NO n eA m ry Qj CA 0 ai 8co co Ln rn bz 8 O _ 11 e .,. m r r Suburban Chicago Apartment Market Current Status -Selected Projects/Sites 44 We are tracking many development sites where new product is being proposed. Locations range from the North Shore markets out to Kane/Kendall and the South Cook submarkets. Some of these sites have been approved for development by the local municipalities and are moving forward; however, other projects have not progressed either due to rents not being high enough to support construction costs or the inability to obtain either the equity or a construction loan. Some projects classified as "confidential" are consulting assignments for which we have been retained but are not yet public. The proposed projects are typically 150 to 300 units and are widely distributed throughout the region. There are numerous additional sites in the region proposed for multi -family. Pipeline of Proposed Projects © 2019 Integra Realty Resources -Chicago Property Submarket City Developer Status Units 5th Avenue Aurora/Naperville Na pervi I I e Rya n Planning 400 Ellinwood Apts/SEC Ellinwood & Gra cel and Cook NW Des Plaines Bayview-Compasspoint Planning 212 Maple St Lofts/215-225 E Prospect Cook NW Mt Prospect Nicholas & Assoc Planning 257 Central and Main Cook NW Mt Prospect First Equity & Harlem Irving Planning 86 Element at Veridian/Motorolasite Cook NW Schaumburg UrbanStreet/VennPointRE Planning 260 Plum Farms/NWC Rts 59 & 72 Cook NW Hoffman Estates latarola Planning 253 AT&T Campus/Hoffman Estates Cook NW Hoffman Estates Somerset Planning 379 NWC Lake & Church Cook NW Hanover Park Monroe Residential Planning 131 Hickory Apartments, NWC Hickory & Kensington Cook NW Arlington Heights Neri Planning 76 Art i ngton 425/Ca mpbel I/Highl a nd/Chestnut Cook NW Arlington Heights Norwood Planning 358 Arlington Downs - Phase II Cook NW Arlington Heights Springbank/Trandel Planning 263 Arlington Downs - Phase III Cook NW Arlington Heights Springbank/Trandel Planning 360 SEC Main & Ogden DuPage Lisle Flaherty & Collins Planning 164 Woodmoor on Finley Road/frmr Ken -Loch DuPage Uninc/Lombard UrbanStreet/Atlas Planning 388 McChesney & Miller site DuPage Glen Ellyn Springbank/Trandel Planning TBD Duane/Melrose DuPage Glen Ellyn Reva Planning 48 GeischeShoes/NWC Main & Hillside DuPage Glen Ellyn GSP - Debb/Kosich Planning 107 Cantera Residences/Ferry W of Winfield Rd DuPage Warrenville Interforum Planning 364 Vanguard Cantera/Regal Theatre site/Diehl Rd DuPage Warrenville Covington Realty Planning 242 Everton Reserve/M/I Homes site- ES Rt 59 DuPage Warrenville Atlantic Realty Partners Planning 259 Westmont Station/One North Cass (Cass & Burl ingtor DuPage Westmont Gammonley Planning 208 Confidential DuPage Confidential Confidential Planning TBD Vistas of Mill Creek Ka ne-Kenda I I Geneva Shodeen Planning 268 Charlestown Mall site/E of K NS E Main Kane -Kendall St Charles Kra usz Companies Planning 256 One Washington Place/NWC Wash. & Wilson Kane -Kendall Batavia Shodeen Planning 190 Reserve at Hudson Crossing/Frmr Alexdr Lumber Kane -Kendall Oswego Shodeen Planning 176 Randall Oaks/WS Randall N of Randall Comm Kane -Kendall North Aurora Shodeen Planning 261 Randall Rd/Recreaction Dr Kane -Kendall West Dundee HIS Properties Planning 280 Station Square/Trimm Property Lake Libertyville Swanson Planning 92 Former Kmart/225 S Rand Lake LakeZurich Garden Homes Planning 162 NWC Rt 22 & Old Rand Rd Lake LakeZurich MBR Properties Planning 100 Confidential Lake Confidential Confidential Planning TBD The Legacy/1621 Chicago North Shore Evanston Horizon Planning 215 Karger Center property/1850 Green Bay Rd North Shore Highland Park Albion Planning 171 Solo Cup site/Old Deerfiled Rd North Shore Highland Park Interforum Holdings Planning 400 One Wi nnetka/EI m & Lincoln North Shore W i nnetka Stonestreet/Tra ndel Planning 36 Northbrook Court mall site North Shore Northbrook Brookfield Planning TBD 87 Hundred/8700 Waukegan North Shore Morton Grove Equibase/Heartland Planning 184 Bess Hardware site/1850 Glenview Rd North Shore Glenview Drake Planning 72 Deerbrook Center site/SWC Lake&Waukegan North Shore Deerfield Reva/Gateway Fairview Planning 246 Confidential North Shore Confidential Confidential Planning TBD Confidential North Shore Confidential Confidential Planning TBD The Boulevard at Central Station South Cook Tinley Park South St Dev/VIN Planning 165 Residence at Brookside Glen/SW 191st & 80th South Cook Tinley Park Mayher/DJM Planning 144 Highland RidgeApts/143rd & W of 355 Will Lockport Equibase/Heartland Planning 240 CedarlakeVillage/WS Wallin NS Lockport St Will Plainfield Buckingham Planning 280 Village PlaceApts/Normantown E of Brunswick Will Romeoville Rose/S.R. Jacobsen Planning 216 Total (excl udi ng TBD projects) 8,969 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Suburban Chicago Apartment Market 45 Conclusions With an average delivery of roughly 1,200 units per year in the Chicago suburban market since 1996, the addition to overall supply has been minimal, especially considering the size of the metropolitan area. Combined with the number of condo conversions that occurred in the market in the early 2000s, the supply of rental units has actually seen a decline. While certain submarkets are adequately supplied with rental units at this time, we believe opportunities exist to create additional rental product. The diverse employment base for the MSA and our direct surveys of buildings in the market indicates a strong long-term picture for multi -family rental product. Difficulties remain however in securing large enough sites suitable for development and obtaining the necessary zoning approvals in light of general community opposition to rental development. As shown, these factors are contributing to a shift in development to more high-density sites — potentially in redeveloping downtown markets as transit -oriented developments. The costs of construction remain high ($250+/- psf) for these mid -rise structures (concrete construction) and while demand may certainly exist, the feasible rent levels will be catering to the upper end of the market. In the outlying suburbs, lower cost garden -style development is continuing, with developers able to target a lower new construction price point. While adding supply of substance appears improbable at this point in the MSA overall, we note a significant increase in new construction activity. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Economic Analysis 46 Chicago MSA Area Analysis The subject is located in the Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI Metropolitan Statistical Area, hereinafter called the Chicago MSA, as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. The Chicago MSA is 7,197 square miles in size, and is the third most populous metropolitan area in the nation. Population The Chicago MSA has an estimated 2018 population of 9,504,650, which represents an average annual 0.1% increase over the 2010 census of 9,461,105. The Chicago MSA added an average of 5,443 residents per year over the 2010-2018 period, and its growth in population contrasts with the State of Illinois which had a 0.1% average annual decrease in population over this time. Looking forward, the Chicago MSA's population is projected to increase at a 0.1% annual rate from 2018-2023, equivalent to the addition of an average of 5,403 residents per year. The Chicago MSA's population growth differs from Illinois, which is projected to have little or no change in population during this time. T�opulation Population Compound Ann. % Chng 2010 Census 2018 Estimate 2023 Projection 2010-2018 2018 - 2023 Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI (Metro) 9,461,105 915041650 915311666 0.1% 0.1% Illinois 12,830,632 121768,442 121745,779 -0.1% 0.0% Source: Environics Analytics Employment Total employment in the Chicago MSA is currently estimated at 4,683,800 jobs. Between year-end 2006 and the present, employment rose by 110,700 jobs, equivalent to a 2.4% increase over the entire period. There were gains in employment in eight out of the past ten years despite the national economic downturn and slow recovery. The Chicago MSA's rate of employment growth over the last decade surpassed that of Illinois, which experienced an increase in employment of 0.9% or 53,600 jobs over this period. A comparison of unemployment rates is another way of gauging an area's economic health. Over the past decade, the Chicago MSA has had a 7.5% average unemployment rate, which is the same as the rate for Illinois. The two areas are performing similarly according to this measure. Recent data shows that the Chicago MSA unemployment rate is 4.1% in comparison to a 4.7% rate for Illinois, a positive sign that is consistent with the fact that the Chicago MSA has outperformed Illinois in the rate of job growth over the past two years. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Economic Analysis Employment Trends Tota I Employment (Year End) Unemployment Rate (Ann. Avg.) Year Chicago MSA Change Illinois Change Chicago MSA Illinois 2006 4,573,100 6,000,000 4.2% 4.2% 2007 4,601,700 0.6% 6,034,200 0.6% 4.9% 5.0% 2008 41480,100 -2.6% 5,897,800 -2.3% 6.1% 6.3% 2009 4,264,100 -4.8% 5,628,000 -4.6% 10.2% 10.2% 2010 4,302,400 0.9% 5,686,100 1.0% 10.6% 10.4% 2011 4,363,000 1.4% 5,745,800 1.0% 9.9% 9.7% 2012 4,440,700 1.8% 5,823,400 1.4% 9.1% 9.0% 2013 4,513,200 1.6% 5,880,000 1.0% 9.1% 9.1% 2014 4,583,400 1.6% 5,969,300 1.5% 7.1% 7.1% 2015 4,674,100 2.0% 6,052,600 1.4% 5.9% 6.0% 2016 4,683,800 0.2% 6,053,600 0.0% 5.8% 5.9% Overa I I Change 2006-2016 110,700 2.4% 53,600 0.9% Avg Unemp. Rate 2006-2016 7.5% 7.5% Unemployment Rate - December 2017 4.1% 4.7% Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Eco nomy. com. Employment figures are from the Current Employment Survey (CES). Unemployment rates are from the Current Population Survey (CPS). The figures are not seasonally adjusted. Major employers in the Chicago MSA are shown in the following table. 47 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Economic Analysis Major Employers - Chicago- Nape rvi I le-EIgi n,, - - Wi (Metro) Source: Crain's Chicago Business Date: January 18, 2017 Gross Domestic Product The Chicago MSA is the third largest metropolitan area economy in the nation based on Gross Domestic Product (GDP). 48 Economic growth, as measured by annual changes in GDP, has been somewhat higher in the Chicago MSA than Illinois overall during the past eight years. The Chicago MSA has grown at a 1.4% average annual rate while Illinois has grown at a 1.2% rate. As the national economy improves, the Chicago MSA has recently performed similarly to Illinois. GDP for the Chicago MSA rose by 0.9% in 2016 while Illinois's GDP rose by 0.9%. The Chicago MSA has a per capita GDP of $59,810, which is 11% greater than Illinois's GDP of $54,091. This means that Chicago MSA industries and employers are adding relatively more value to the economy than their counterparts in Illinois. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Na me Number of Employees 1 U.S. Government 42,887 2 Chicago Public Schools 271406 3 City of Chicago 301276 4 Cook County 211795 5 Advocate Healthcare 181308 6 University of Chicago 16,197 7 Northwestern Memorial Healthcare 151317 8 State of Illinois 15,136 9 JP Morgan Chase & Co 141158 10 United Continental Holdings, Inc. 14,000 11 Hea Ith Care Service Corp. 13,006 12 Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. 13,006 13 Presence Health 10,500 14 Abbott Laboratories 10,000 15 Northwestern University 91708 16 Jewel -Osco 91660 17 Chicago Transit Authority 91510 18 University of Illinois at Chicago 91212 19 American Airlines Group, Inc. 8,900 20 Rush University Medical Center 8,273 21 AT&T Inc. 8,000 22 Al Istate Corp. 7,800 23 Wa I ma rt Stores, I nc. 71700 24 Empl oyco USA Inc. 71409 25 Aon PLC 71335 Source: Crain's Chicago Business Date: January 18, 2017 Gross Domestic Product The Chicago MSA is the third largest metropolitan area economy in the nation based on Gross Domestic Product (GDP). 48 Economic growth, as measured by annual changes in GDP, has been somewhat higher in the Chicago MSA than Illinois overall during the past eight years. The Chicago MSA has grown at a 1.4% average annual rate while Illinois has grown at a 1.2% rate. As the national economy improves, the Chicago MSA has recently performed similarly to Illinois. GDP for the Chicago MSA rose by 0.9% in 2016 while Illinois's GDP rose by 0.9%. The Chicago MSA has a per capita GDP of $59,810, which is 11% greater than Illinois's GDP of $54,091. This means that Chicago MSA industries and employers are adding relatively more value to the economy than their counterparts in Illinois. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Economic Analysis 49 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis and Economy.com; data released September 2016. There I ease of state and local GDP data has a longer Iagtime than national data. The data represents inflation-adjusted "real" GDP stated in 2009 dollars. Income, Education and Age The Chicago MSA has a higher level of household income than Illinois. Median household income for the Chicago MSA is $69,412, which is 8.3% greater than the corresponding figure for Illinois. Median Household Income - 2018 Median Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI (Metro) $69,412 Illinois $64,068 Comparison of Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI (Metro) to Illinois +83% Source: Environics Analytics Residents of the Chicago MSA have a higher level of educational attainment than those of Illinois. An estimated 36% of Chicago MSA residents are college graduates with four-year degrees, versus 33% of Illinois residents. People in the Chicago MSA are similar in age to their Illinois counterparts. The median age of both the Chicago MSA and Illinois is 38 years. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction ($ Mil) ($ Mil) Yea r Chicago MSA % Change Illinois % Change 2009 516,764 638,032 2010 522,484 1.1% 645,983 1.2% 2011 529,860 1.4% 658,411 1.9% 2012 545,392 2.9% 6711493 2.0% 2013 543,676 -0.3% 669,261 -0.3% 2014 5521758 1.7% 679,343 1.5% 2015 563,789 2.0% 686,010 1.0% 2016 568,969 0.9% 692,453 0.9% Compound % Chg (2009-2016) 1.4% 1.2% GDP Per Capita 2016 $59,810 $54,091 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis and Economy.com; data released September 2016. There I ease of state and local GDP data has a longer Iagtime than national data. The data represents inflation-adjusted "real" GDP stated in 2009 dollars. Income, Education and Age The Chicago MSA has a higher level of household income than Illinois. Median household income for the Chicago MSA is $69,412, which is 8.3% greater than the corresponding figure for Illinois. Median Household Income - 2018 Median Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI (Metro) $69,412 Illinois $64,068 Comparison of Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI (Metro) to Illinois +83% Source: Environics Analytics Residents of the Chicago MSA have a higher level of educational attainment than those of Illinois. An estimated 36% of Chicago MSA residents are college graduates with four-year degrees, versus 33% of Illinois residents. People in the Chicago MSA are similar in age to their Illinois counterparts. The median age of both the Chicago MSA and Illinois is 38 years. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Economic Analysis Percept CoII ege ria id Source's Enviroinics AnodytiC. Conclusion c Igo -Naperville- Illinois Elgin, [L l' -W1 (Metro) 50 The Chicago MSA economy will benefit from a stable to slightly growing population base and higher income and education levels. The Chicago MSA experienced growth in the number of jobs over the past decade, and it is reasonable to assume that employment growth will occur in the future. Moreover, the Chicago MSA gains strength from being the third most populous metropolitan area in the country and having both a higher rate of GDP growth and a higher level of GDP per capita than Illinois overall. We anticipate that the Chicago MSA economy will improve and employment will grow, strengthening the demand for real estate. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Economic Analysis Demographic Trends — 2018 Statistics In researching the demographics of the target market area, we have provided data from Environics Analytics for the demographics of the residents located within the one, three and five mile radii of downtown Mt. Prospect. This includes information relating to the 2000 U.S. Census, 2018 estimates (based upon the 2010 census), and 2023 projections for the area. We fully recognize that while the demographics provide insights on the existing population, demand for the subject units will come from both the immediate market area and from outside this market area. 51 Demographics A demographic profile of the surrounding area, including population, households, and income data, is presented in the following table. Demographics • A demographic profile of the surrounding area, including population, households, and income data, is presented in the following table. Surrounding i 2018 Estimates 1 -Mile Radius 3 -Mile Radius 5 -Mile Radius Chicago - Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI (Metro) Illinois Population 2010 16,401 126,396 298,794 9,461,105 12,830,632 Population 2018 16,202 125,336 299,921 9,504,650 12,768,442 Population 2023 16,082 124,708 300,011 9,531,666 12,745,779 Compound % Change 2010-2018 -0.2% -0.1% 0.0% 0.1% -0.1% Compound % Change 2018-2023 -0.1% -0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Households 2010 6,283 50,371 115,804 3,475,726 4,836,972 Households 2018 6,270 50,528 117,339 3,528,983 4,859,251 Households 2023 6,247 50,511 117,804 3,553,670 4,868,017 Compound % Change 2010-2018 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% Compound % Change 2018-2023 -0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Median Household Income 2018 $94,461 $79,298 $75,012 $69,412 $64,068 Average Household Size 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.6 College Graduate % 45% 42% 41% 36% 33% Median Age 44 43 41 38 38 Owner Occupied % 88% 74% 72% 66% 67% Renter Occupied % 12% 26% 28% 34% 33% Median Owner Occupied Housing Value $326,644 $310,124 $295,087 $242,814 $196,422 Median Year Structure Built 1959 1968 1970 1969 1969 Avg. Travel Time to Work in Min. 34 32 32 35 32 Source: Environics Analytics • As shown above, the current population within a 3 -mile radius is 125,336, and the average household size is 2.5. Population in the area has declined since the 2010 census, and this trend is projected to continue over the next five years. This is in contrast to the population of the Chicago MSA, which is projected to grow, as discussed previously. it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction Economic Analysis • Median household income is $79,298, which is higher than the household income for the Chicago MSA. Residents within a 3 -mile radius have a higher level of educational attainment than those of the Chicago MSA, while median owner -occupied home values are considerably higher. Renter and Owner Household Demographics In addition, we have provided information from Ribbon Demographics which analyzes the individual household segments in the five mile radius of downtown Mt Prospect, showing the information separately for the renter and owner households. 52 it Maple Street Lofts - Proposed Construction