HomeMy WebLinkAbout7. Village Manager's Report 10/21/2014Prospect
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER, MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: WATER/SEWER SUPERINTENDENT
DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
SUBJ: BID RESULTS FOR 2014 SEWER LINE SPOT RELAYS ($270,050)
BACKGROUND
Some sewer pipe segments have significant structural defects that can only be effectively
repaired by excavating and replacing segments of sewer main (spot relays).
To facilitate this work in 2014, staff prepared the Sewer Line Spot Relays Project bid document.
The Sewer Line Spot Relay bid package was drafted to procure the services of a sewer
excavation contractor capable of replacing structurally failed pipe.
This memorandum will present the results of bids for spot relay work. The locations of the work
planned for the proposed Sewer Line Spot Relays award are outlined in Attachment A. This
year's proposed project features seventeen (17) point repairs.
BID RESULTS
Prior to letting, twenty-four (24) bid packets were distributed to area contractors experienced in
sewer construction. In addition, public notice was posted in a local newspaper as required. A
mandatory pre-bid conference was held on October 6, 2014 to allow for questions on the plans
and project. Sealed bids were received until 1:00 P.M. on Tuesday, October 14, 2014 at which
time they were opened and read aloud. Six (6) bids were received.
The bid results are as follows:
Bidder
Total Bid
Suburban General Construction, La Grange Park, IL
$245,500.00
Martam Construction, Elgin , IL
$271.630.00
Lenny Hoffman Inc., Wilmette, IL
$275,536.00
Kovilic Constructing Co. Inc., Franklin Park, IL
$295,500.00
A Lamp, Schaumburg, IL
$335,800.00
Maneval Construction, Ingleside, IL
$346,335.00
Page 2 of 2
Bid Results for 2014 Sewer Line Spot Relays ($270,050)
October 14, 2014
DISCUSSION
Staff has evaluated all bids and determined that all bids received are responsive to the request.
All bidders submitted the required bid bonds and appropriate references. All six (6) bidders
attended the mandatory pre-bid conference.
The apparent low bidder for the proposed spot relay work is Suburban General Construction of
La Grange Park, IL. Suburban General has worked on numerous Village projects in the past.
They have met all the bid requirements and submitted the required bid bonds. Previous work
for the Village has been timely, without issue and of high quality.
Staff's estimate on the cost of the repairs for the 2014 project is between $255,000 and
$275,000.
Staff recommends the inclusion of a 10% contingency in the award for this proposed contract
due to the fact that the bid quantities are estimates and actual field measurements will vary. In
this instance, staff is recommending a 10% contingency to the contract award in the amount of
$24,550.00.
The total recommended award will be $270,050.00 ($245,500 base award plus a 10%
contingency of $24,550).
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the Village Board award a contract for the 2014 Sewer Line Spot Relays to
Suburban General Construction, Inc of La Grange Park, IL in an amount not to exceed
$270,050.00. Sufficient funds for this proposed contract exist in the current budget.
Matt Overeem
Superintendent Water & Sewer
I concur.
-,an-P. Dorsey
irector of Public Works
H:\Water\projects\2014\Spot Repair Project 2014\Spot Relays Board Report 2014.doc
CC: Village Clerk Lisa Angell
Deputy Director of Public Works Jason Leib
Administrative Superintendent Kristina Jakupovic
File
ATTACHMENT A
October 2014
Printed by JJP/PW
F:1Projects\CASEY12014\SPOT REPAIRS12014SPOTREPAIRS.mxd
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER
DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2014
SUBJECT: KENSINGTON BUSINESS CENTER JOGGING PATH AND LIGHTING
IMPROVEMENTS
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
NOT TO EXCEED $91,139.86
Background
As part of the Kensington Business Center development in the 1980's, the annexation agreement
requires the Village to maintain certain amenities within the Business Park, including the jogging
path and the jogging path lighting system. The jogging path pavement is deteriorating and in
need of repair. The lighting system is experiencing numerous wiring failures and because of the
age of the system, needed lamp and fixture replacement is becoming more difficult.
The jogging path spans across the business park from east to west and has fingers to the north
and south to provide connectivity to the entire business park. The existing lighting system is not
continuous but provides lighting at critical locations along the path. To facilitate the design and
construction of the improvements, the path improvements have been split into 3 phases: Phase 1
— west of Feehanville Drive, Phase 2 — between Feehanville Drive and Business Center Drive, and
Phase 3 — east of Business Center Drive. Attached is an exhibit depicting the 3 phases. It is the
Village's intent to have the entire project, all three phases, designed at this time, as three separate
sets of plans and bidding documents, and construct Phases 1 and 2 in 2015. To accomplish this,
staff is seeking at this time to enter into a contract for Design Engineering for Phases 1, 2 and 3
and for Construction Engineering for Phases 1 and 2.
Discussion
As permitted by the Qualification Based Selection process, the Village solicited Statements of
Qualifications from 4 qualified engineering consulting firms for design engineering services for the
jogging path pavement and the jogging path lighting system and for construction engineering
services for the jogging path pavement and the jogging path lighting system. Each firm was asked
to submit as part of their proposal the following information:
1. Resumes of key personal and related experience on similar type projects.
2. A summary of the firms approach to the project.
3. A staff hour estimate for major phases of work.
4. A project schedule.
Tasks that were identified to be performed included:
1. Topographic survey
2. Preliminary design
3. Final plan preparation
4. Bidding assistance
2014 Kensington Business Center Jogging Path and Lighting Improvements
October 15, 2014
5. Attending meetings
6. Obtaining all necessary permits from other agencies.
7. Construction engineering layout and inspection.
8. Any additional tasks that the consultant recommends.
The consulting firms' statement of qualifications were reviewed on the basis of their
understanding of our goals and their methodology of the design and construction process. They
were rated (with a maximum score of 18 points) according to these specific categories: relevant
experience, project objectives, project design, understanding of necessary permits, project
construction, and projected work hours to complete tasks.
The rankings are: Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 15 points
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 14 points
Ciorba group, Inc. 13 points
Baxter and Woodman, Inc. 11 points
Discussions were entered into with the top two ranking consultants and Gewalt Hamilton
Associates, Inc. demonstrated a clear understanding of our project goals and brought to our
attention two additional considerations to our attention. They suggested that an alternate design
consider widening the jogging path pavement to 8' to meet current minimum standard width
and that the condition of the bridges be assessed and include any repairs or replacement of the
bridges if necessary.
Because of their insight into the project, staff requested a cost proposal from Gewalt Hamilton,
Inc. to perform the tasks as identified including potential for widening the path and bridge
inspections. They submitted a not to exceed cost of $91,139.86 based on 822 hours to complete
the project. This averages out to a rate of $110/hour. It is the opinion of staff that the work
hours allotted are reasonable and the rate is competitive and comparable to rates of recent
projects.
Gewalt Hamilton has satisfactorily provided engineering services for a number of projects for the
Village of Mount Prospect, most recently the Kensington Road Reconstruction Project.
Recommendation
It is my recommendation that the Village Board accept the proposal from Gewalt Hamilton
Associates, Inc. for Design Engineering of Phases 1, 2 and 3 and Construction Engineering of
Phases 1 and 2 of the Kensington Business Center Jogging Path and Jogging Path Lighting
Improvements for a not to exceed amount of $91,139.86.
There are funds appropriated in the 2014 Budget for this proposed expenditure.
Please include these items on the October 21St Village Board Meeting Agenda.
u Becker
1 concur with the aJyve reco mendation.
Sean P. Dc1r*,1,,Dire&or of Public Works
H:\Engineering\Lighting\KBC\Lighting and Jogging Path Improvements\Design Recommendation Mm.docx
2
z
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2014
SUBJECT: KENSINGTON ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION
SUPPLEMENT #1 (45,907.39)
BACKGROUND
The Village of Mount Prospect and the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT)
entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) in 2011 to accomplish the
reconstruction of Kensington Road between Elmhurst Road and Prospect High School
based on federal funding the Village received for participation in the cost of design and
construction engineering and for the construction cost of the project. Per the terms of
the IGA, the Village Board approved a Construction Engineering Services Agreement for
Federal Participation and awarded a contract to Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. to
perform construction engineering duties. The IGA stipulated that the full cost for
construction engineering services were to be covered by federal and state participation.
While the Village pays the construction engineering costs, they are reimbursed 100% by
federal and state funds. There is no local, or Village, share required. Unfortunately
project delays have caused increased construction engineering costs. Thus the Village is
being requested to approve Construction Engineering Services Agreement for Federal
Participation Supplement #1.
DISCUSSION
Project delays caused by IDOT and project subcontractors have increased the time and
documentation required to fulfill the requirements of the construction engineering duties.
Delays during IDOT's approval of the disposal of site material caused increased time and
documentation. Delays caused by failure of some project subcontractors to timely
complete their construction activities also resulted in an increase in the construction
engineering time and documentation. This Supplement #1 will provide the additional
funding to pay for the construction costs that will be needed to complete the project.
While the Village is required to approve this supplement for additional funding, the costs
are 100% reimbursable by federal and State funds. There will be no Village cost
associated with this Supplement. The project is nearing completion with only punch list
items remaining, mostly landscaping issues to replace new trees that did not survive.
Page 2
Kensington Road Reconstruction Project
October 13, 2014
RECOMMENDATION
It is my recommendation that the Village Board approve the Kensington Road
Reconstruction Construction Engineering Services Agreement for Federal Participation
Supplement #1 in an amount not to succeed $45,907.39 at the October 21, 2014 Village
Board Meeting.
1,effey A. Wulbecker
y
1 concur with the above recommendation.
Sean P. Dorse hector of Public Works
H:\Engineering\Agencies\N WMC\STP Projects\Ke n si ngton Rd\Ph asel I I\Con su ltantRecMm
2