Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. New Business 10/07/2014Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 611 SUBJECT: PZ -29-14 / 1 HATLEN AVE. / VARIATION (REAR YARD SETBACK) The attached exhibits illustrate the Petitioners' proposed improvements, which include demolishing the existing detached garage and constructing a one-story building addition at the east end of the existing home. The building addition would consist of a family room, mud room and an attached garage. The site plan indicates the building addition would be setback ten feet (10') from the rear yard property line when the Village Code requires a minimum twenty-five foot (25') rear yard setback. The Petitioners are seeking a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') rear yard setback. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, September 25, 2014, and by a vote of 6-1, recommended approval of a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') rear yard setback along the east lot line, as shown in the plans prepared by Beata Kociuba and date stamped August 28, 2014, at 421 N. Pine Street, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1) Obtaining written approval from all entities with rights to the ten foot (10') utility easement allowing the roof overhang to encroach into the easement. 2) Obtaining an IDOT permit for any work in the Central Road right of way. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their October 7, 2014 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. _ ). William J. Coney, Jr., 41CP WflWh I hcdMPLAMPlaoning&Zoning COMW&Z 2014\MEI Mcmos1PZ-29-I4 I Hadco Ave (VAR -Rear Yard Setback) docs Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -29-14 LOCATION: l Hatlen Avenue PETITIONERS: Krzysztof Dolubizno and Marzena Dolubizno OWNER: Helena Bzura PARCEL #: 08-10-215-001 LOT SIZE: 0.23 acres (10,027 square feet) ZONING: RI Single Family Residence LAND USE: Single Family Residential REQUEST: Variation (Rear Yard Setback) LOCATION MAP w rw+.. _ 1`rri91i11gtt7r) H :4j Subject Property W CENTRAL RD t Ar '"'ton Heights w -1- Village of Mount Prospect r Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON FROM: CONSUELO ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2014 SUBJECT: PZ -29-14 /I HATLEN AVE. / VARIATION (REAR YARD SETBACK) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the September 25, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Krzysztof Dolubizno and Marzena Dolubizno (the "Petitioners") regarding the property located at 1 Hatlen Avenue (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioners are seeking a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') rear yard setback. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the September 10, 2014 edition of the Daily Herald newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is a corner lot located at the southeast corner of Hatlen Avenue and Central Road. The existing improvements consist of a one-story single-family residence with related improvements. The structures, including the entrance and driveway, face Central Road. The Subject Property is zoned R1 Single Family Residence and is bordered by the RI District to the west and south. The Village of Arlington Heights borders to the north and east, which consists of commercial and single- family residential respectively. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The attached exhibits illustrate the existing and proposed improvements. The existing home measures 1,110 square feet in area and includes three (3) bedrooms, a dining/living room and a kitchen. The accessory structures include a wood deck located along the south building elevation and a detached garage located at the southeast corner of the property. The Petitioners would like to demolish the existing detached garage and construct a one-story building addition at the east end of the existing home. The building addition would consist of a family room, mud room and an attached garage. The site plan indicates the building addition would be setback ten feet (10') from the rear yard property line when the Village Code requires a minimum twenty-five foot (25') rear yard setback. The Petitioners are seeking a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') rear yard setback. The elevation plans indicate the proposed addition will be constructed to blend with the architectural style and building materials of the existing home. The building materials will consist of brick veneer, natural stone, and cedar siding (shake style). The south and north elevations will include casement windows. PZ -29-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting September 25, 2014 GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE Page 2 The Subject Property currently complies with the Village's R1 zoning regulations. With the exception of the rear yard setback, the proposed improvements would comply with the R1 zoning regulations. The following table compares the existing and proposed improvements to the R1 Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. The italicized text denotes items that require zoning relief from the Village Code's bulk regulations. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS The Subject Property includes a ten foot (10') utility easement located along the rear property line. Per the Village Public Work's Engineering Division, the building, including any overhang from the roof, may not encroach into the easement. If the Variation to the rear yard setback is approved, the Petitioners will be required to revise the proposal so that the roof overhang does not encroach into the ten foot (10') utility easement. However, if all parties having rights to the easement approve the encroachment of the roof overhang, the Engineering Division may approve as well. The Petitioners would be required to obtain written approval from all entities with rights to the easement to allow the roof overhang to encroach into the easement. The Subject Property also includes an existing curb cut and driveway apron on Central Road, which is a State roadway. The site plan does not clearly indicate to what extent the existing curb cut and driveway, including apron, will be modified. The Petitioners will be required to obtain an IDOT permit for any work in the Central Road right of way. The removal of the existing pavement located along the rear lot line is also not clearly indicated on the site plan. A detailed site plan clearly indicating all of the proposed improvements will be required as part of the building permit application submittal. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Per the Petitioners, the options of developing are limited due to the Subject Property being a corner lot. The variation to the rear yard setback would allow them to enjoy the Subject Property to its full potential. The proposed improvements would provide the convenience of having extra living space (family room), a mud room, R1 Single Family District Minimum Reauirements Existing Proposed SETBACKS: Front (west) 30' 29.96' No change Exterior Side (north) 20' 30.08' 30' Interior Side (south) 8.2' 24.19' 21.5' Rear (east) 25' 51.18' 10' F.A.R .5 Maximum .11 .22 LOT COVERAGE 45% Maximum 37.5% 34% ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS The Subject Property includes a ten foot (10') utility easement located along the rear property line. Per the Village Public Work's Engineering Division, the building, including any overhang from the roof, may not encroach into the easement. If the Variation to the rear yard setback is approved, the Petitioners will be required to revise the proposal so that the roof overhang does not encroach into the ten foot (10') utility easement. However, if all parties having rights to the easement approve the encroachment of the roof overhang, the Engineering Division may approve as well. The Petitioners would be required to obtain written approval from all entities with rights to the easement to allow the roof overhang to encroach into the easement. The Subject Property also includes an existing curb cut and driveway apron on Central Road, which is a State roadway. The site plan does not clearly indicate to what extent the existing curb cut and driveway, including apron, will be modified. The Petitioners will be required to obtain an IDOT permit for any work in the Central Road right of way. The removal of the existing pavement located along the rear lot line is also not clearly indicated on the site plan. A detailed site plan clearly indicating all of the proposed improvements will be required as part of the building permit application submittal. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Per the Petitioners, the options of developing are limited due to the Subject Property being a corner lot. The variation to the rear yard setback would allow them to enjoy the Subject Property to its full potential. The proposed improvements would provide the convenience of having extra living space (family room), a mud room, PZ -29-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting September 25, 2014 Page 3 an attached garage, and a larger yard along the south property line for gardening. The Petitioners further state the proposed improvements would not be detrimental to the public or other property in the neighborhood. The proposed building addition would be one-story in height and designed to blend with the existing home and homes in the neighborhood. While Staff understands the Petitioners' desire for the building addition, there is no hardship. The Subject Property is not atypical of other corner lots located in the Village subject to a rear yard setback. Staff explored alternative options of providing extra living space and an attached garage while complying with Code requirements. A second floor addition or a one-story building addition in the interior side yard are two options that could be constructed and allow for an attached garage at the east end of the home while complying with Code requirements. The Petitioner found the alternative options not feasible due to the costs and the modifications to the existing floor space that would be required. RECOMMENDATION The Variation request for ten foot (10') rear yard setback does not meet the standards for a Variation contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends that the P&Z deny the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') rear yard setback along the east lot line, as shown in the plans prepared by Beata Kociuba and date stamped August 28, 2014, subject to the following conditions: 1) Obtaining written approval from all entities with rights to the ten foot (10') utility easement allowing the roof overhang to encroach into the easement. 2) Obtaining an IDOT permit for any work in the Central Road right of way." This case is Village Board final since the Variation exceeds 25% of the Zoning Ordinance requirement. I concur: Wiffiaua-looney, AICP, Director of Community Development /it H1PLAMPIanning & Zoning COMMMZ 2014\SIaR Reports\PZ-29-14 f Haticn Ave (VAR- Rear yard) docs MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -29-14 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUEST MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Hearing Date: September 25b, 2014 1 Hatlen Avenue Krzysztof Dolubizno and Marzena Dolubizno September 10'', 2014 08-10-215-001 Variation- Rear Yard Setback Agostino Filippone Thomas Fitzgerald William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Sharon Otteman Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Krzysztof Dolubizno and Marzena Dolubizno Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Commissioner Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Youngquist to approve the minutes of the August 28"', 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 7-0. After hearing two (2) previous cases Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ -29-14, 1 Hatlen Avenue. Ms. Andrade stated that the Petitioners for PZ -29-14 are seeking a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') rear yard setback for a building addition at 1 Hatlen Avenue. Ms. Andrade stated the Subject Property is a corner lot located at the southeast corner of Hatlen Avenue and Central Road. The existing improvements consist of a one-story single-family residence with related improvements. The structures, including the entrance and driveway, face Central Road. Ms. Andrade explained that the Subject Property is zoned R1 Single Family Residence and is bordered by the RI District to the west and south. The Village of Arlington Heights borders to the north and east, and consists of commercial and single-family residential. Ms. Andrade further explained that the Petitioners would like to demolish the existing detached garage and construct a one-story building addition at the east end of the existing home. The building addition would consist of a family room, mud room and an attached garage. The site plan indicates the building addition would be setback ten feet (10') from the rear yard property line when the Village Code requires a minimum twenty-five foot (25') rear yard setback. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25, 2014 PZ -29-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade stated the front elevation plan indicates the building materials of the addition will consist of brick veneer, natural stone, and cedar siding. Ms. Andrade showed a table comparing the existing proposed improvements to the R1 Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. Ms. Andrade further explained the Subject Property currently complies with the Village's RI zoning regulations. With the exception of the rear yard setback, the proposed improvements would comply with the R1 zoning regulations. Ms. Andrade summarized the Standards for a Variation as the following: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Ms. Andrade stated, per the Petitioners, the options of developing are limited due to the Subject Property being a corner lot and the variation to the rear yard setback would allow them to enjoy the Subject Property to its full potential. Ms. Andrade further stated, per the Petitioner, that the proposed improvements would provide the convenience of having extra living space (family room), a mud room, an attached garage, and a larger yard along the south property line for gardening. The Petitioners further state the proposed improvements would not be detrimental to the public or other property in the neighborhood. The proposed building addition would be one-story in height and designed to blend with the existing home and homes in the neighborhood. Ms. Andrade stated while staff understands the Petitioners' desire for the building addition, there is no hardship. The Subject Property is not atypical of other corner lots located in the Village subject to a rear yard setback. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff explored alternative options of providing extra living space and an attached garage while complying with Code requirements. A second floor addition or a one-story building addition in the interior side yard are two options that could be constructed and allow for an attached garage at the east end of the home while complying with Code requirements. Ms. Andrade stated that the Petitioner found the alternative options not feasible due to the costs and the modifications to the existing floor space that would be required. Ms. Andrade stated the Variation request for ten foot (10') rear yard setback does not meet the standards for a Variation contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends that the P&Z deny the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') rear yard setback along the east lot line, as shown in the plans prepared date stamped August 28, 2014, subject to the following conditions: 1) Obtaining written approval from all entities with rights to the ten foot (10') utility easement allowing the roof overhang to encroach into the easement. 2) Obtaining an IDOT permit for any work in the Central Road right of way." Ms. Andrade stated this case is Village Board final since the Variation exceeds 25% of the Zoning Ordinance requirement. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25, 2014 PZ -29-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Chairman Donnelly swore in Kryzksztof & Marzena Dolubizno from 1 Hatlen Ave. Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Dolubizno stated they are trying to make more space for the family. They would like to add a small family room onto the home and have a mud room that connects to the garage. Mr. Dolubizno stated that he wants to move the garage from the back to the house and connecting it to the front of the home. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner if it is possible to move the garage one foot away from the easement so the eaves of the roof do not overhang in the easement. Mr. Dolubizno stated that they would have no problem complying with that condition. Chairman Donnelly stated that would take care of the issue by making the addition one (1') foot shorter. Mr. Simmons stated that if the petitioner gets sign off from the parties with rights to the easement it will not be an issue because you are allowed to have roof overhangs in the required yards. Chairman Donnelly asked if they get the sign off then the Petitioners can keep their design if the case gets passed on. Mr. Simmons stated that the easement sign off is a condition upon approval of the case. If they don't get the sign off approvals then the Petitioner would have to move the addition back one foot from the easement. Chairman Donnelly stated that if the utilities don't grant the easement then they would have adjust the project accordingly; however, for the sake of this evenings vote the current design and measurements will be voted upon. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any more questions for the petitioner. Commissioner Youngquist stated the case was difficult because the subject property is a corner lot which are typically problematic with expansions. Commissioner Beattie stated that it is difficult because majority of the homes were designed forty to fifty years ago when larger homes weren't the norm. Commissioner Youngquist stated that the project seemed like a lot to do just for another four hundred 400 square feet of living space. Chairman Donnelly said the current design makes the Petitioner lose a lot of the current space in the house. Commissioner Youngquist stated that the other cases requesting the similar variations on corner lots have been denied in the past. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25, 2014 PZ -29-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Chairman Donnelly stated based on the current circumstances just moving the garage up keeping it detached wouldn't be a problem; however, would they still be able to build the mudroom in between because they are close on FAR and light on lot coverage. Mr. Simmons stated that there needs to be a three foot (3') separation between two (2) structures per code. Commissioner Beattie asked if there would have to be an agreement between the utility carriers and the Village in order to allow a detached garage within the ten foot (10') easement. Ms. Andrade stated the Subject Property is an existing non -conforming structure which may have been built without the Village's knowledge of the easement or the easement may have been granted after the structure was constructed. Commissioner Beattie clarified that the current location of the detached garage is within the ten foot (10') easement. Ms. Andrade stated that was correct. Mr. Simmons clarified that the existing garage is in the easement but does comply with the zoning regulations for setbacks. He explained the minimum setback from the property line is five (5) feet; the easement provides additional restrictions on what the Petitioner can do on their property so that it would further restrict them to a ten (10) foot setback unless they get sign off from everyone with rights to the easement to allow the structure. Commissioner Youngquist stated he remembers one case that needed to get the utility sign off for a similar project and it took them over a year to do so. Commissioner Kueter asked what was to the east of the home. Ms. Andrade stated a single family residence with a circular drive is located to the east of the property which is considered Arlington Heights. Chairman Donnelly asked if the neighbors in Arlington Heights were notified. Ms. Andrade stated they were properly notified. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioners if they had talked to their neighbors about the project. Mr. Dolubizno said he did speak with the neighbors and they were in favor of the project. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens present to discuss the case; hearing none he brought the discussion back to the board. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Fitzgerald to approve the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') rear yard setback along the east lot line, as shown in the plans prepared date stamped August 28, 2014, subject to the following conditions: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25, 2014 PZ -29-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair 1) Obtaining written approval from all entities with rights to the ten foot (10') utility easement allowing the roof overhang to encroach into the easement. 2) Obtaining an IDOT permit for any work in the Central Road right of way." UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Beattie, Kueter, Mizwicki, Filippone, Fitzgerald, Donnelly NAYS: Yongquist The vote was approved 6-1 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. Village Board decision is final for this case. After hearing three (3) additional cases Commissioner Yongquist made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie to close the hearing and the meeting was adjourned at 9:09 pm. Jenna Moder Jenna Moder, Administrative Assistant Community Development Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25, 2014 PZ -29-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair EOPooL GENERAL NOTES: a CONCRETEQ ° cNL BMEERS 0 IRON PVMT. LAND SURVEYORS TO YOUR DEED, TITLE COMMITMENT, ORDINANCE, ETC. N89'33'45"E 125355 LEMONT RD. LEMONT, ILLINOIS 60439 PHONE: (630) 739-0707 FAX: (630) 739-6080 a a ° NORTH. CHICAGO METRO AREA PHONE: (7731 581-9477 4. SURVEY IS BASED ON FIELD WORK COMPLETED ON FEBRUARY 20, 2013 IRON FENCE ABBREVIATIONS: n • o n a � STANDARDS FOR A BOUNDARY SURVEY." R = RADIUS S'LY = SOUTHERLY l EMAIL: EDP OL®COMCAST.NET PLAT (r) = RECORD VALUE WLY = WESTERLY COUNTY OF DUPAGE O F SURVEY J n_ o z n OF LOT 70 IN HATLEN HEIGHTS UNIT NO. 3, A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON JULY 11, 1956, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1682004. PIN # 08-10-215-001-0000 i (ASSUMED) — — -----CENTRAL— — — R A D- - - 1 O • - I GENERAL NOTES: a CONCRETEQ ° 1. TITLE COMMITMENT REPORT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT FOR THIS SURVEY; 0 IRON PVMT. PIPE ■ REBAR/ROD - NOTCH TO YOUR DEED, TITLE COMMITMENT, ORDINANCE, ETC. N89'33'45"E 3. BEARINGS ARE FOR ANGULAR REFERENCE ONLY AND ARE NOT RELATED TO TRUE OR MAGNETIC a a ° NORTH. WOOD FENCE 4. SURVEY IS BASED ON FIELD WORK COMPLETED ON FEBRUARY 20, 2013 IRON FENCE ABBREVIATIONS: n • o n a � STANDARDS FOR A BOUNDARY SURVEY." R = RADIUS S'LY = SOUTHERLY l CH = CHORD LENGTH E'LY = EASTERLY STATE OF ILLINOIS SS (r) = RECORD VALUE WLY = WESTERLY COUNTY OF DUPAGE (m) = MEASURED VALUE TYP - TYPICAL P.U.D. = PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT J n_ o z n DISTANCES ARE MARKED IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS OF SAID SURVEY. A, THEREOF. .y0 FT B 111 INC MINE t LEMONT, ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 26, 2013 ORDERED BY: KRZYSZTOF DOLUBIZNOk 96 OS _ _� m {jF LAND SURVEYOR irL ZM/AB IWN PROFESSIO L NO SURVEYOR NO. 035-003403 MORRIS, IL SURVEYED BY: ORDER NO: 13-029 MY LICENSE EXPI S 1 /30/2014 Q \ TE. OF V 44�� bO cc oo SI OR ' � 0 o BRICK 5UILDIIN'G�/%%% LOT 70 P C, N N/PSMT ! f of /� o K! N 23.07' ° I W kkk WOOD DECK ��p o" 3 o — STONE ' N FRAME H N GARAGE ry z PVMT. w BRICK—^1 ° 0 fl PAT10 t\ / "`J//" 21.82' WOOD FENCE 01S..d CHAIN UNK FENCE 01S. ' 122.291 CHAIN LINK FENCE 0.SS. FRO IP DO' ! S8932'55" W LOT 69 GENERAL NOTES: SET 0 IRON PIPE t CROSS 1. TITLE COMMITMENT REPORT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT FOR THIS SURVEY; 0 IRON 2. FOR BUILDINGS LINES, EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS NOT SHOWN HEREON REFER PIPE ■ REBAR/ROD - NOTCH TO YOUR DEED, TITLE COMMITMENT, ORDINANCE, ETC. 3. BEARINGS ARE FOR ANGULAR REFERENCE ONLY AND ARE NOT RELATED TO TRUE OR MAGNETIC —' —' — CHAIN LINK FENCE NORTH. WOOD FENCE 4. SURVEY IS BASED ON FIELD WORK COMPLETED ON FEBRUARY 20, 2013 IRON FENCE ABBREVIATIONS: "THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONFORMS TO THE CURRENT ILLINOIS MINIMUM TECHNICAL L = ARC LENGTH WILY= NORTHERLY STANDARDS FOR A BOUNDARY SURVEY." R = RADIUS S'LY = SOUTHERLY l CH = CHORD LENGTH E'LY = EASTERLY STATE OF ILLINOIS SS (r) = RECORD VALUE WLY = WESTERLY COUNTY OF DUPAGE (m) = MEASURED VALUE TYP - TYPICAL P.U.D. = PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT WE, GEOPOOL SURVEYORS, INC. DO HEREBY STATE THAT WE HAVE PREPARED THE BOUNDARY SCALE 1 INCH EQUALS 20 FEET SURVEY DEPICTED HEREON. THIS PLAT REPRESENTS THE CONDITIONS FOUND AT THE TIME DISTANCES ARE MARKED IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS OF SAID SURVEY. A, THEREOF. ,SN ke LEMONT, ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 26, 2013 ORDERED BY: KRZYSZTOF DOLUBIZNOk PROFESSIONAL { DRAWN BY: KB {jF LAND SURVEYOR irL ZM/AB IWN PROFESSIO L NO SURVEYOR NO. 035-003403 MORRIS, IL SURVEYED BY: ORDER NO: 13-029 MY LICENSE EXPI S 1 /30/2014 Q \ TE. OF V 44�� X � 10 LA I � r O0 Ln 3 r 0 0 q , ❑ ❑ ❑ � 2 | k � 9 � ■ |! ; , m � 7 — 1 � ■ |§ Li k| ■ | $ |I |k J 01 § � | Of)) � $ $ �¥; rl 1 fa � Oi , 2 K $\2 .k , .q � �"� � ( � � '/�� `/ � � k� |k & � � | � � |�|■ � � �` 1 � $ � |§� | �_ \ � � k| 2 ) 9 | { m � § | 30'-6" 29'-1" D N f O W I N y O O N N to - I- I � o 6'-3" 5._3» Ull I � � N 0 12._1» ❑ `���� � MUD R. I I 8 ' i I 12'-7" m O m O vl a o I 3'-6" I I I g 9 _1» un�c 7' -2" 4'-6" Q z 12-0 WN 1117 rn y� t N vx-i 2 y� O m R ;I N_ 8 H� r� mm a o : � aq - �)/ \ \: a\ Cl§} \% e C \/ ®6 0 z' j% a\ Cl§} e � ° \ mew V) 'HAVE. \ \ AV\ 82. 2 § n pE § 20 ) �\ 277@!2{ k as %\ � _- -� q |« D � C*4 ,-| | © m- � � § - 2 LU / -- - U §- 2 $ * �s ; �iN3113Ia*e )82.00' � t K ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION (REAR YARD SETBACK) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 HATLEN AVENUE, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Krzysztof Dolubizno and Marzena Dolubizno (Petitioners), have filed a petition for a Variation to allow for a ten (10) foot rear yard setback along the east lot line for property located at 1 Hatlen Avenue (Property) and legally described as: LOT 70 HATLEN HEIGHTS UNIT NO. 3, A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON JULY 11, 1956, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1682004. Property Index Number 08-10-215-001-0000; and WHEREAS, the “Petitioners” seek a Variation to allow a ten (10) foot rear yard setback for the construction of a building addition as shown on the Petitioner’s Site Plan date stamped August 28, 2014, attached as Exhibit “A” for the property located at 1 Hatlen Avenue; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of PZ-29-14 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on th the25 day of September, 2014, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in th the Daily Herald Newspaper on the 10 day of September 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the Mayor and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-29-14; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the request meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the Variation to allow a ten (10) foot rear yard setback for the construction of a building addition would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect grant a Variation to allow a ten (10) foot rear yard setback along the east lot line, as shown on the site plan date stamped August 28, 2014, subject to the following conditions: 1. Obtaining written approval from all entities with rights to the ten foot (10’) utility easement allowing the roof overhang to encroach into the easement. 2. Obtaining an IDOT permit for any work in the Central Road right of way. Page 2/2 PZ-29-14 SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance and Exhibit “A” with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of October, 2014. ______________________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\\CLKO\\WIN\\ORDINANCE2\\2014\\VAR-PZ-29-141HatlenyardsetbackOct2014.doc : � aq - �)/ \ \: a\ Cl§} \% e C \/ ®6 0 z' j% a\ Cl§} e � ° \ mew V) 'HAVE. \ \ AV\ 82. 2 § n pE § 20 ) �\ 277@!2{ k as %\ � _- -� q |« D � C*4 ,-| | © m- � � § - 2 LU / -- - U §- 2 $ * �s ; �iN3113Ia*e )82.00' � t K Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 Mount Prospcct 11 SUBJECT: PZ -30-14 / 2021 TANO LANE / VARIATION (FRONT YARD SETBACK) The Petitioner would like to construct an attached garage in front of the existing attached garage in order to address flooding that has occurred over the years due to design of the current home and driveway. The site plan indicates a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback when the Village Code requires a minimum thirty feet (30'). The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, September 25, 2014, and by a vote of 7-0, recommended approval of a Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback along the north lot line, as shown in the plans date stamped August 28, 2014. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their October 7, 2014 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. C oney, Jr., AIC 7 \\Vfl\vh l hcdSTLAW[mauag&Zoning COMMT&Z 2014WEJ McmosTZ-30-14 2021 Tano Lmic(VAR-From Yard Selback) docx Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -30-14 LOCATION: 2021 Tano Lane PETITIONER: Guillermo Garcia OWNERS: Guillermo Garcia and Gisela Garcia PARCEL #: 03-25-209-011 LOT SIZE: 0.25 acres (10,718.7 square feet) ZONING: R1 Single Family Residence LAND USE: Single Family Residential REQUEST: Variation - Front Yard Setback LOCATION MAP FILE COPY VILLAGE OF We PROSPECT mr.. #' AI AL I � p I I I4 , ✓ `•III ,'I �'1l a 11 1! f Y v, i Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: > 'JITROSPECT PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION f " -%) 3fVP. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON f M FROM:"'�"'n`� �. t. S a O ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2014 SUBJECT: PZ -30-14 / 2021 TANO LANE / VARIATION (FRONT YARD SETBACK) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the September 25, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Guillermo Garcia (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 2021 Tano Lane (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the September 10, 2014 edition of the Daily Herald newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is a corner lot located at the southeast corner of Tano Lane and River Road and consists of a split level single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RI Single Family Residence and is bordered by the R1 District to the north, west and south. The Cook County Forest Preserve borders across River Road to the east. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The existing home currently includes an attached garage that sits below the surrounding grade level and has a downward pitch driveway leading up to the garage door. The Petitioner would like to construct a new attached garage in front of the existing attached garage in order to address flooding that has occurred over the years. The site plan indicates a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback when the Village Code requires a minimum thirty feet (30'). The plans indicate the proposed garage addition would accommodate two vehicles. The garage addition would measure nine feet (9') in height and would consist of siding that matches the existing home. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The Subject Property currently complies with the Village's R1 zoning regulations. With the exception of the front yard setback, the proposed improvements would comply with the R1 zoning regulations. The following table compares the existing and proposed improvements to the R1 Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. The italicized text denotes items that require zoning relief from the Village Code's bulk regulations. PZ -30-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting September 25, 2014 Page 2 R1 Single Family District Minimum Requirements Existing Proposed SETBACKS: Front (north) 30' 34.39' 12'-10" Exterior Side (east) 20' 55' No Change Interior Side (west) 9.8' 14.71' No Change Rear (south) 25' 29' No Change F.A.R .5 Maximum .11 .15 LOT COVERAGE 45% Maximum 23.18% 23.54% ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS The Village Engineering Division reviewed the Petitioner's proposal and indicated the proposed encroachment into the front yard would not extend into any easements and would not adversely impact the drainage for the site. Compliance with the floodplain ordinance would still be required. As required by the Village Code, any fill placed in the floodplain, including backfilling the reverse -pitch driveway, will require that compensatory storage be provided on site at a rate of 1.5:1. The storage volume will need to be addressed during the building permit review process. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner indicates the Subject Property is located in the flood plain. The current design of the home and the down pitched driveway has made the home more susceptible to flooding. The home has flooded four (4) times since 2005. In addition, Tano Lane and Park Drive flood during heavy rainfall events. As a result, the petitioner states they have lost personal belongings and even a vehicle over the years. The Petitioner points out they have covered repair work out of pocket on a couple of occasions and now pay $2,400 annually for flood insurance. The proposed improvement would allow for an attached garage to be built even with the grade level and eliminate the down pitched driveway in order to correct the flooding issues the home experiences. The Petitioner met with Village Staff on numerous occasions to discuss alternative options. Building a detached garage in the rear yard and utilizing the existing driveway apron was discussed. This scenario was ultimately found not feasible as it would not provide the required vehicle turning radius into the garage while staying out of the ten foot (10') public utility and drainage easement located along the rear property line. This scenario would have also increased the overall lot coverage to approximately thirty five percent (35%). Another alternative discussed was constructing a detached garage to the east of the home and adding new curb cut and driveway from Tano Lane. This scenario was not feasible due to a parkway tree located in the Tano Lane parkway, which would have conflicted with the proposed driveway location. Removing the tree would not be supported by the Forestry PZ -30-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting September 25, 2014 Page 3 Division. This scenario would have also increased the overall lot coverage. A potential alternative to this design would be to have the driveway circumvent the tree, and not be perpendicular to the house or street. The Petitioner submitted a list of five (5) homes in the area consisting of similar designs to what is being proposed. The images illustrate the homes include an attached garage that projects closer to the front lot line than the rest of the structure. Village Staff researched the history of the properties and found that 1409 Sauk Lane received Variation approval to allow a seventeen foot and eight inch (17'-8") front yard setback for a two car garage addition in 1972. The remainder of the homes listed did not have a history of variation approvals. The Plat of Surveys on file indicate the front yard setbacks vary from twenty-two feet (22') for one parcel to twenty- nine feet (29') for the remaining three. When compared to other properties within the Village, the Subject Property is unique as to the physical characteristics of the property due to the presence of the flood plain. This uniqueness however is limited to comparison with the community at large as there are several properties in the immediate area which have similar constraints of a depressed garage and flood plain restrictions (i.e. 1402, 1403, 1407, and 1409 Park; 2024 Tano). However, the Subject Property is differentiated as it is a corner lot with a shallower lot depth when compared to other properties in the subdivision. The required front, exterior side, and rear setbacks limit the amount of the property that is buildable for a primary structure. The existing improvements are located at the west end of the corner lot due to the required setbacks and the presence of the 100 year flood plain. Although the proposed garage addition would be setback twelve feet and ten inches (12'-10"), the parkway measures approximately nineteen feet (19') at this location. Therefore, the proposed addition would be sited over thirty-one feet (31') from the curb line of Tano Lane. The Petitioner's proposed improvements would not further exasperate flooding issues in the area as they would be required to provide any necessary compensatory storage for work within the flood plain. Based on the above, staff believes the request affirms several of the standards for support of a variation. The unique physical conditions of the Subject Property present a specific hardship to the property owner. To install a driveway and garage on the east side of the property within the established setbacks would require a significant amount of fill and compensatory storage that creates a hardship unique to this parcel. The Petitioner's proposed garage location will limit the amount of fill necessary on site, thereby minimizing the compensatory storage required. As a result, staff is supportive of the requested variation based on the unique characteristics of this property. RECOMMENDATION The Variation request for a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard meets the standards for a Variation contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends that the P&Z approve the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback along the north lot line, as shown in the plans date stamped August 28, 2014." This case is Village Board final since the Variation exceeds 25% of the Zoning Ordinance requirement. I concur: Wil . m J. Cooney, A1CP, Director of Community Development A, 1%VfR1h1 rdSlp[.hM41-M09& ZCNn. COhfW&I 2014\StaRRgmrls\PZ-30-14 2021 Taro Lane (VAR- Front Yard Selback).docs MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -30-14 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUEST MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: September 25b, 2014 2021 Tano Lane Guillermo Garica September 10b, 2014 03-25-20-011 Variation- Front Yard Setback Agostino Filippone Thomas Fitzgerald William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Sharon Otteman Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development Guillermo Garcia & Gisela Garcia Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Commissioner Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Youngquist to approve the minutes of the August 28"', 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 7-0. After hearing three (3) previous cases Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ -30-14, 2021 Tano Lane. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner for PZ -30-14 is seeking a Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback for a garage addition at 2021 Tano Lane. Ms. Andrade stated the Subject Property is a corner lot located at the southwest corner of Tano Lane and River Road and consists of a split level single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RI Single Family Residence and is bordered by the RI District to the north, west and south. The Cook County Forest Preserve borders across River Road to the east. Ms. Andrade stated the existing home currently includes an attached garage that sits below the surrounding grade level and has a downward pitch driveway leading up to the garage door. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner would like to construct a new attached garage in front of the existing attached garage in order to address flooding that has occurred over the years. The site plan indicates a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback when the Village Code requires a minimum thirty feet (30'). Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25t1, 2014 PZ -30-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade stated the proposed garage addition would accommodate two vehicles and would measure nine feet (9') in height and would consist of siding that matches the existing home. Ms. Andrade showed a table comparing the existing and proposed improvements to the R1 Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. She further explained the Subject Property currently complies with the Village's RI zoning regulations; with the exception of the front yard setback, the proposed improvements would comply with the RI zoning regulations. Ms. Andrade summarized the Standards for a Variation as the following: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Ms. Andrade stated the petitioner indicates the current design of the home and the down pitched driveway has made the home more susceptible to flooding. Further, Tano Lane and Park Drive flood during heavy rainfall events. The home has flooded four (4) times since 2005. The proposed improvement would allow for an attached garage to be built even with the grade level and eliminate the down pitched driveway in order to correct the flooding issues the home experiences. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner met with Village Staff on numerous occasions to discuss alternative options but found alternative scenarios were not feasible or practical. For example, to install a driveway and garage on the east side of the property within the established setbacks would require a significant amount of fill and compensatory storage that creates a unique hardship. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner's proposed garage location will limit the amount of fill necessary on site, thereby minimizing the compensatory storage required. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff believes the Petitioner's request meets several of the Variation standards. She further explained the unique physical conditions of the Subject Property present a specific hardship to the property owner. The existing improvements are located at the west end of the corner lot due to the required setbacks and the presence of the 100 year flood plain. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner's proposed improvements would not further exasperate flooding issues in the area as they would be required to provide any necessary compensatory storage for work within the flood plain. The proposed garage addition would be setback twelve feet and ten inches (12'-10") from the property line. However, the garage addition would be setback thirty-one feet (31') as measured from the curb line of Tano Lane as the parkway measures approximately nineteen feet (19'). Ms. Andrade stated when compared to other properties within the Village, the Subject Property is unique as to the physical characteristics of the property due to the presence of the flood plain. This uniqueness however is limited to comparison with the community at large as there are several properties in the immediate area which have similar constraints of a depressed garage and flood plain restrictions (i.e. 1402, 1403, 1407, and 1409 Park; 2024 Tano). Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25t1, 2014 PZ -30-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade stated the Subject Property is differentiated as it is a corner lot with a shallower lot depth when compared to other properties in the subdivision. The required front, exterior side, and rear setbacks limit the amount of the property that is buildable for a primary structure. Ms. Andrade stated Staff is supportive of the requested variation based on the unique characteristics of this property. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback along the north lot line, as shown in the plans date stamped August 28, 2014." She stated the case is Village Board Final. Commissioner Fitzgerald asked if Staff knew of any other properties with similar pitched driveways that also had a deeper parkway like the Subject Property. Ms. Andrade stated that the width of the parkway along the south side of Tano Lane looks visibly wider than the north half which includes a public sidewalk; however, the public right -a -way is the same throughout the area. She further explained that along Park Drive the parkway is considerably narrower than Tano. Commissioner Fitzgerald stated that he is concerned for future homeowners who may request similar improvements whose homes are considerably closer to the road. Chairman Donnelly stated that several homes in the subdivision have similar pitched driveways. He further stated because of the flood plain in which the Subject Property is located the cost is much greater as oppose to another property owner who can just put the garage next to the house. Mr. Simmons stated that there are about five other homes along Tano and Park that have similar downward pitched driveways which are also in similar flood plain conditions. Mr. Simmons stated some residents have corrected the issue by building a driveway along the side of the property to a detached garage in the back of the home. He further explained that Staff looked at a similar option for the Petitioners but it wasn't feasible to access the rear of the site. Chairman Donnelly swore in Guillermo Garcia and Gisela Garcia from 2021 Tano Lane Mount Prospect. Mr. Garcia stated they have met with Staff and Public Works multiple times throughout this project. He stated all of Tano Lane has experienced a lot of flooding over the years. Mr. Garica stated that he is just trying to find a remedy to help with the excessive flooding that is happening inside their home. He stated they are proposing to build the a garage in the front of the home at grade level and close off the existing garage which will be used for storage. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner if they will raise the garage to prevent future flooding. Mr. Garcia stated the garage will be even with the front door or just a couple inches below. Commissioner Yongquist asked how many times the Petitioner has flooded. Mr. Garica stated they have flooded four times in the past nine years. He gave a brief history of the work that has had to be done in order to repair the damage every time it floods. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25t1, 2014 PZ -30-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Mr. Garcia further stated that they have a sump pump in the garage but it doesn't seem to keep up during the heavy rains. Commissioner Mizwicki asked if the current garage space is going to be turned into living space. Mr. Garcia said it will be used for storage right now, because they have another living room on the other side of the home. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens to discuss the case. Hearing none he closed the public portion of the meeting and brought the discussion back to the board. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Youngquist to approve the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12'-10") front yard setback along the north lot line, as shown in the plans date stamped August 28, 2014." UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Youngquist, Kueter, Mizwicki, Filippone, Fitzgerald, Beattie, Donnelly NAYS: None The motion was approved 7-0 and with a positive recommendation to the Village Board's whose decision is final for this case. After hearing three (3) additional cases Commissioner Youngquist made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie to close the hearing and the meeting was adjourned at 9:09 pm. Jenna Moder Jenna Moder, Administrative Assistant Community Development Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- September 25t1, 2014 PZ -30-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair J J O Z U H CO <O Qaf W IL N H: O U 0 W Q Z N0N Q 6L J � V'� J W 0 ry 0 U -j C/) cf) O Q � 0 z a.... IL W fes— r \ F- 1 -,Iasi 1 \ D Z Ia W ~ i 0 b f 1 IL N Q � O) e (} I �� WLLI IL yJ __ G y GOOF. N \ \ \ ppoop Lupo I11� O 00000 0000 W i'.. \ 0 wawa an ww 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- - - X ii-9� aNi W� oopoo-'-,6 " � I w o W W Z D d i pOr-n �0 V C f�aT���a N O �w�oo0c7 .� 04 x ¢H.��z�zz� ,w � v wwF��o L V vVl W 0 z O W W z LL. LL ,W V J O^ CL 0�/ L.L. a z O F— i� W LW W V) LL O ry W F— z n w O r O ry r S30 ava s6/of Nan ai3 0 ZZ 0 'ON 'I•S'd 91T#NOLLYHOdHOO HOAR V' TSS SOOZ '(1-V ;.-T, VQ ISL SIHZ'sIONmI 'Id3IAaf)arda .LV 'iyss ci.,;v aNVH HOO H3aNa N3A10 '9002 '0£ HSHIFHAON NO S&2MZfi1 3SN3OI7 AAi •,LN3143HH9V Aa lox HO 13S HHV SH3NN03 AS213dOHd •A3AHOS XU13Nnoe V M D'i SOFiYQ! "IS WIWININ SION1Z71 JN8HHf7D 3H,L OI. SWUOANOO 33IA85S 'IV.N01SSAAOMd SIH,L '3032T311L simmac ONV ,4333 N7 3HV NO3H3H N,NOHS SNOFSN3iti IQ 11V 'A3AHOS �Vii,L 3O N01.1.VNHS3HdHH J.3321HOO V s( NO3H3H NAIOHS "L "" 3H,L S,VH.I. (1-'',' N035HFi (1810 70S3Q ASH3dOHd 3IHS a3A3AHOS HAVH 9TT ON +:o1.Iraaaaca d0A?A'o'!]S agr 7VNOISSSAOitd SIONMI "OKI 'ASAH:IS ClUU2.d32Td 'a& .LVIII AdI.LHa3 W SI SIH,L ,02=„T :,glvoS N slo8vs A ONVW :OIL s 9, 3�N2d a— x V 9991-996-90L xed / 9694-996-904 SUOIld 99609 '41 'AHURBalH8 ',LHRHLS H164 'AI 9'694 Y3u1 `XHA AIS (laMladaxa gI A ,g� P ,h SIONIl'iI f� 3O 3Svd,S 9TT 'ON ci NOILVHOdHOa ti Z HOXaAIIIIS ONVZ 7VNOISSaAOHd �d 411 S Q �� l.0pit1111ft."lt �S/'ii tiC> : Z3ddOl •r i3�Haiw r ��f�ijQ•,., � dsyee�e• *'-a .40 '"+3 'bS 4'9T4'0T = QHAHAU IS VHZIV QNV'I 0000-TTO-60Z-SZ-EO # NId SIONITII 'loadSOHd MOON ,HIM ONVJ, '3 IZOZ ;ssamav SIONI'I'II 'A,LNOOo %005 N1 '894£9941 QHIH,L 5111.1d0 SV 11 '9T Q3QHOOO 303HdH.L .LVTa 3H.L OZ ONIQHOOOV 'NVIMH9I� 0 JSV3 TTT R9NVH 'HSNN 2I' d1HSNALO.L 'S2 NOLLO3S d0 6/I J.SV3H,LM O:N. ris. ,dr is/T HZHON 3HI NI NOISIAIQHOS V ONI3H 'T H3IION ZINrO HONViV 613IA000dt K;1 X21 XHAM 1S dO WVId '9 9'T 9GNd 9o.Y I S'9 W 'N 9'2 SON” 900Y ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION (FRONT YARD SETBACK) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2021 TANO LANE, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Guillermo Garcia (Petitioner), has filed a petition for a Variation to allow for a twelve foot and ten inch (12’-10”) front yard setback along the north lot line for property located at 2021 Tano Lane (Property) and legally described as: LOT 23 IN WOODVIEW MANOR UNIT NUMBER 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE NORTH ½ OF THE NORTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 16, 1960, AS DOCUMENT 17883769, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS Property Index Number 03-25-209-011-0000; and WHEREAS, the “Petitioner” seeks a Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12’-10”) front yard setback for the construction of a garage addition as shown on the Petitioner’s Site Plan, attached as Exhibit “A” for the property located at 2021 Tano Lane; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of PZ-30-14 before the th Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the25 day of September, 2014, th pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Daily Herald Newspaper on the 10 day of September 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-30-14; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the request meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12’-10”) rear yard setback for the construction of a garage addition would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect grant a Variation to allow a twelve foot and ten inch (12’-10”) front yard setback along the north lot line, as shown on the site plan date stamped August 28, 2014, a copy of which is attached and made a part of as Exhibit “A”. SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance and Exhibit “A” with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of October, 2014. ______________________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\\CLKO\\WIN\\ORDINANCE2\\2014\\VAR-PZ-30-142021TanoLnyardsetbackOct2014.doc J J O Z U H CO <O Qaf W IL N H: O U 0 W Q Z N0N Q 6L J � V'� J W 0 ry 0 U -j C/) cf) O Q � 0 z a.... IL W fes— r \ F- 1 -,Iasi 1 \ D Z Ia W ~ i 0 b f 1 IL N Q � O) e (} I �� WLLI IL yJ __ G y GOOF. N \ \ \ ppoop Lupo I11� O 00000 0000 W i'.. \ 0 wawa an ww 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- - - X ii-9� aNi W� oopoo-'-,6 " � I w o W W Z D d i pOr-n �0 V C f�aT���a N O �w�oo0c7 .� 04 x ¢H.��z�zz� ,w � v wwF��o L V vVl W Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 Mount &I SUBJECT: PZ -24-14 / 200 W. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY / CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE- THROUGH) The Petitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval to allow a drive-through restaurant at 200 W. Northwest Highway. The attached exhibits illustrate a revised proposal consisting of two multi -tenant buildings totaling 10,374 square feet. The drive-through lane would wrap around the side and rear elevation of a 3,528 square foot building located at the west end. The building located at the east end would measure 6,846 square feet in area and include four (4) tenant spaces. The existing access drive from Elmhurst Avenue and cross access easement would be maintained. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, September 25, 2014, and by a vote of 4-3, recommended approval of a Conditional Use to allow a drive-through at 200 W. Northwest Highway, subject to the following conditions: 1) Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Tinaglia Architects dated September 18, 2014, but revised to: a. Providing a stop sign where the drive-through lane intersects the existing drive at the cross access easement. b. Providing a left turn only sign where the drive-through lane intersects the existing drive at the cross access easement. c. Aligning the north curb line of the drive-through lane with the north end of the existing cross access easement. 2) Development of the building in conformance with the elevations prepared by Tinaglia Architects dated October 1, 2014. 3) Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by InSite Landscape Design dated October 1, 2014, but revised as needed to comply with Code. 4) Submittal of a photometric (lighting) plan and fixture cut sheets that comply with Village Code requirements. 5) Providing an agreement with the Village for use of its property for an outdoor dining area. 6) Replacement of the existing nonconforming freestanding signs with new freestanding signs that comply with the Village Sign Code, including a minimum five (5) foot setback from property lines and placement outside of sight triangles. 7) Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village Codes and regulations including signage. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. hAplan\planning & zoning comm\p&z 2014\mej memos\pz-24-14 200 w, northwest hwy.(cu -drive-Ihrough).dou Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their October 7, 2014 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. Cooney, Jr., Mf P hAplaMplanning 8 zoning commlp&z 2014Vnej memoslpz-24-14 200 w, northwest hwy..(cu -drive-through) do" Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 SEPTEMBER 25, 2014 PZ -24-14 / 200 W. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY / CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE- THROUGH) This memo is intended to supplement the staff report prepared for Case# PZ -24-14, regarding the Conditional Use request for a drive-through at 200 W. Northwest Highway. The case appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 28, 2014 and was continued. Based on the discussions during the August 28`h meeting, the Petitioner has revised the proposal to include two multi -tenant buildings totaling 10,374 square feet in area and provide additional outdoor dining areas. The 3,468 square foot building would include two tenant spaces, including the drive-through establishment. The drive- through lane would wrap around the side and rear of the building. The updated plan also includes two trash enclosures located along the drive-through lane. The existing access drive from Elmhurst Avenue and cross access easement would be maintained. The revised drawings address several comments discussed at the previous hearing. Based on the revised drawings staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motions: "To approve: 1) A Conditional Use to operate a drive-through restaurant; a) Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Tinaglia Architects dated September 18, 2014. b) Development of the building in conformance with the elevations prepared by Tinaglia Architects dated August 15, 2014, but revised to illustrate the new two building design. c) Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by InSite Landscape Design dated July 16, 2014, but revised as needed to comply with Code. d) Submittal of a photometric (lighting) plan and fixture cut sheets that comply with Village Code requirements. e) Providing an agreement with the Village for use of its property for an outdoor dining area. f) Replacement of the existing nonconforming freestanding signs with new freestanding signs that comply with the Village Sign Code, including a minimum five (5) foot setback from property lines and placement outside of sight triangles. g) Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village Codes and regulations including signage. The Village Board's decision is final. I concur: , AICP, Director of Community Development hAplan\planning & zoning carnn\p&z 2014\staff mpons\pz-2J-Il 200 w, northwest highway.(cu drive-through)_supplement docs MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -24-14 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUEST MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Hearing Date: September 25b, 2014 200 W. Northwest Highway LRA Equities, LLC. August 13, 2014 08-12-100-013-0000 Conditional Use for drive-through Agostino Filippone Thomas Fitzgerald William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Sharon Otteman Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Scott Whistler, John Luxem, and Jim Tinaglia Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Commissioner Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Youngquist to approve the minutes of the August 28"', 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 7-0. Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ - 24 -14 from old business, 200 N. Northwest Highway. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner for PZ -24-14 is seeking Conditional Use approval to allow a drive- through at 200 W. Northwest Highway. This case appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 28, 2014 and was continued per the petitioners' request. Ms. Andrade stated the plat of survey indicates the existing conditions of the property. The existing building is currently in the process of being demolished. Ms. Andrade further stated the Petitioner is seeking to redevelop the property into a commercial building that includes a drive-through. Ms. Andrade stated the original site plan from the August meeting included one building with a drive- through at the west end of the building. Planning and Zoning Commission- September 25, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade stated, since the August meeting the Petitioner revised the site plan after discussions with Village Staff and the adjacent property owner. The revised site plan includes two buildings instead of one with the drive through wrapping around one of the buildings located on the west end of the property. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motion: "To approve: A Conditional Use to operate a drive-through restaurant; subject to the conditions listed in the supplemental staff report. Chairman Donnelly swore in the Scott Whisler 1413 E. Wing Street Arlington Heights, Illinois and Jim Tinaglia 107 W. Hawthorne Arlington Heights. Mr. Whisler stated they took the comments made by the board at last month's meeting into consideration. He further stated they reduced the footprint by approximately 2,000 square feet, and that the drive- through was moved towards the east which moves some of the traffic over to the east end away from the main entrance. Mr. Whisler also explained that the new plan includes another trash enclosure which increases the amount to two on the site and should be sufficient for the size of the buildings. Mr. Whisler stated the new design creates four end cap units which he feels improves the overall design of the project and flow of traffic on the site. Chairman Donnelly stated that they received a letter from Mount Prospect State Bank that they are supporting the new design and wanted to add three minor changes to the project. Including a stop sign provided where the drive -up intersects with the easement, a "left turn only" sign where the drive -up intersects with the easement and lastly a slight shift to the drive connection point so the north curb aligns with the existing easement. Mr. Tinaglia stated that they could make those adjustments. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner if they understand and accept the conditions that Staff has presented in the last meeting. Mr. Whisler stated they do understand and accept the conditions set forth by Staff. Commissioner Mizwicki asked if it is common for all Dunkin Donuts to have a single lane drive-through. Mr. Tinaglia stated there is a single lane at the entrance of the drive-through for the first twelve feet (12') and then opens to about sixty foot (60') wide opening in case a car needs to pull over out of the drive through line. He further clarified that the drive-through establishment will only be a Dunkin Donuts not in combination with Baskin Robbins. Commissioner Mizwicki stated regardless he still feels that it should be a double lane in the drive- through. Planning and Zoning Commission- September 25, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Commissioner Mizwicki commented on the outdoor dining area being along the side of the drive-through lane. He stated he didn't think people would like to sit and eat along there with the drive-through lane that close to the seating area. Mr. Tinaglia stated that the outdoor dining area was just a concept they included in the drawing to show there was some unused space in that area. He further stated the drive-through will be busier in the mornings and not around lunch time or in the evening when the outdoor dining area will be most likely be used. Commissioner Mizwicki stated his concerns regarding the single lane drive-through lane. He suggests taking out the outdoor seating option and making it a double lane drive-through. Mr. Whisler stated they don't see a need for a double lane drive-through in this area, and stated there isn't enough room to add in a double wide drive-through lane in that area. Mr. Simmons stated the Village Code doesn't specify how wide the drive-through lane needs to be or the amount of lanes needed. He further explained staff typically requests that a bypass lane be provided if feasible. He stated the code doesn't specifically state the bypass lane needs to be the entire length of the drive-through. Commissioner Mizwicki stated that the other Dunkin Donuts locations in the area all have dual lane drive-throughs and believes this one should also have it as well. Mr. Tinaglia stated that the Dunkin Donuts owner also owns thirty different locations in the area and if he believes the double lane bypass is pertinent they would do what they can to incorporate it into the design of the building. Commissioner Fitzgerald stated that the Dunkin Donuts on Rand Road next to the Menards is a single lane drive through and seems to work with no problems. There was general discussion between the board regarding the need to a dual lane drive-through versus a single lane. Commissioner Youngquist stated that he believes the new proposal is a great improvement upon the first submittal. He stated he likes the design much better with the two buildings as opposed to the one longer building with the drive-through on the end. Chairman Donnelly agreed and stated the new design improves functionality of the site as well as aesthetically. Mr. Whisler stated there will be substantial signage for the businesses along with directional signs to let customers know there is a drive-through along the back of the building. Commissioner Youngquist stated he understands that Northwest Highway is a busy road and that Dunkin Donuts gets majority of their business through the drive-through. He stated he still is uneasy about having a drive-through in the downtown but understands the development is important to the Village. Planning and Zoning Commission- September 25, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Commissioner Beattie stated he had some comments for Staff. He addressed staff stating that he didn't have an issue with the development design before and doesn't have an issue with the new design; however, he stated that the downtown area was closely researched and a great deal of time and money was spent to come up with the best plan for the downtown. Commissioner Beattie stated it's a rare opportunity to develop a piece of property in the middle of the downtown. He quoted the concept for the Tri-State location from the downtown implementation plan stated a walkable, pedestrian oriented environment should be a central goal for this site. Commissioner Beattie further stated that the implementation plan also stated there shouldn't be parking lots visible form Northwest Highway. He explained further that he doesn't want to be critical of the design but feels it's the wrong design/use for the wrong location. Commissioner Mizwicki stated that he agreed with Commissioner Beattie and strongly feels that the development is not suitable for the downtown area and goes against the implementation plan. Commissioner Mizwicki asked the Petitioner if there is a community that has a Dunkin Donuts in the middle of their downtown. Chairman Donnelly swore in John Luxem 210 N. Straton Lane, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Whisler stated there is a Dunkin Donuts on Arlington Heights road kiddy -corner from Village Hall. Commissioner Mizwicki stated he didn't think that was considered downtown Arlington Heights, and further stated that he doesn't believe a drive-through establishment should be in the downtown. Commissioner Youngquist stated that he has reservations about the concept and doesn't think that the overall drive-through use is acceptable in the downtown area, but the new design helps with the visual issues he had with the original plan. Commissioner Youngquist further stated he supports the development because of the changes that have been made. He further explained that he understands that the developer could build a strip center there at any point in time and not have to get approval from the board, and that the drive-through is the only issue that needs to be voted on by the board. Chairman Donnelly stated that he also felt that the split building concept is much better and can visualize residents walking to the site. Mr. Whisler stated that he agreed and also thinks that the site will bring more pedestrian traffic to the area. Commissioner Mizwicki asked who had commissioned the downtown plan. Mr. Simmons stated that the Village had received a grant from the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) to study the downtown area. The initial plan was issued in the early 1990's which guided the development that is currently downtown. He further explained that the new downtown plan is used more as a continuation of what already exists and how to improve and expand upon the current state of the downtown area. Planning and Zoning Commission- September 25, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Mr. Simmons gave a brief explanation of the Village's process in obtaining the downtown plan. Commissioner Beattie reiterated his concerns as to why the project is not suitable for a downtown setting. Chairman Donnelly stated the bank has a drive-through in the general vicinity with a similar use. Commissioner Beattie stated that he doesn't believe it's the same type of use because the traffic flow will be entering off of Northwest Highway. Commissioner Filippone stated that he understands the issue with the drive-through development going against the downtown plan; however, currently the space is a vacant building and parking lot. He further explained it is hard to balance the short term and long term gains the development will have on the Village. He summarized the points Commissioner Beattie and Commissioner Youngquist had made earlier in the meeting, and stated that even though the new design is more visually appealing the previous concerns regarding traffic, noise pollution, and the proximity to the park are still present. Commissioner Fitzgerald stated that he disagrees that the view is short term versus long term because if the drive-through component disappears the whole development has the ability to bypass the Planning and Zoning Commission entirely. He stated he is supportive of the design and wants to see it move forward. Commissioner Fitzgerald further stated that he is concerned if the development doesn't get passed an unappealing development may get passed through because they don't have a drive-through and there wouldn't be any input from the board. Chairman Donnelly stated that he believes that even though this isn't the exact development the Village expected to go into the site, this is probably the closest to the concept. Commissioner Youngquist stated that he is surprised there aren't any residents present to discuss the development and ultimately Village Board has the final decision. Chairman Donnelly swore in Adam Fishman 301 W Central Road Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Fishman stated that he thinks the new plan is great but agrees with Commissioner Beattie and Commissioner Mizwicki that the plan should encompass a larger area and make it a gateway into the Village. Commissioner Youngquist stated that in reality it is very difficult to develop such a large area at once especially because there are many small business owners that own the parcels that make up the area. Commissioner Fitzgerald made a motion seconded by Commissioner Youngquist to approve the following motion: "To approve: A Conditional Use to operate a drive-through restaurant; subject to the conditions listed in the supplemental staff report, including the three conditions added by Mount Prospect State Bank. Planning and Zoning Commission- September 25, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Fitzgerald, Youngquist, Kueter, Donnelly NAYS: Filippone, Beattie, Mizwicki The vote was approved 4-3 with a positive recommendation to Village Board which is final for this case. After hearing three (3) additional cases Commissioner Youngquist made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie to close the hearing and the meeting was adjourned at 9:09 pm. Tenna Moder Jenna Moder, Administrative Assistant Community Development Planning and Zoning Commission- September 25, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Village of Mount Prospect 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Re: 200 W. Northwest Highway, Mt. Prospect, IL. Dear Consuelo, This letter is concerning our proposed development and conditional use application for the above mentioned property. We have met with Mount Prospect State Bank on six different occasions since the August 28`h meeting and have not been able to come to an agreement for numerous reasons. Thus, we have submitted a new plan that we feel is a win/win for all concerned and will have minimal impact on the bank. After listening to the concerns of the Planning & Zoning Commission and through their guidance we feel the attached addresses a number of the issues and comments. We have split the building into two different components and moved the drive thru further east to eliminate any traffic concerns at the existing entrance off Elmhurst Avenue. Although this design will cost more to build than a single larger building as initially proposed, we feel that the overall design works well for the site and is more architecturally pleasing. As proposed this design is 2,045 square feet less than the previous submittal. Lastly, we have added an additional trash enclosure and have moved the other to a better spot on the site. We appreciate all of your hard work, input, and time. We look forward to presenting the new plan on the 9/25/14. Sincerely, . Scott A. Whisler, Member LRA Equities, LLC J1 Mount Prospect Y. State Bank A branch of Glenview State Bank September 25, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Village of Mount Prospect C/o Community Development Department 50 S Emerson Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: LRA Equities Proposed Retail Center #PZ -24-14 Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners: http://mpsb.gsb.com Based upon the site plan dated (revised) 9-18-14 by LRA Equities for the "Proposed Retail Center" at the 200 W. Northwest Highway site abutting our property, Mount Prospect State Bank offers this letter of support for the proposed development. We thank the Planning and Zoning Commission and the development team for taking the time afforded by the continuance from the August 28th Public Hearing to review, reassess and modify the plan in a fashion that respects and considers our shared easement rights and various traffic flow concerns. The modifications made to the plan adequately address our initial concerns. We would respectfully request consideration of a condition for either the placement of a "stop" sign where the drive -up lane is proposed to intersect the existing drive at the easement and a "left turn only" signage at that point. We would also ask that the final plan include a very slight southerly shift of the drive connection point so the north curb aligns with the north end of the existing access easement. Having reviewed the 9-18-14 plan layout, Mount Prospect State Bank hopes the Planning Commission will approve the Conditional Use request for the drive -up lane element, endorse the project, and forward a positive recommendation to the Village Board. Respectfully, Mount Prospect State Bank By: r. John Eilcring, President Member FDIC 299 West Central Road • Mount Prospect, IL 60056.847-832-0950 APPLIED a division of't�rtm September 30, 2014 William Cooney, Jr., AICP — Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Re: PZ -24-14,200 W. Northwest Highway Conditional Use (Drive -Through) Dear Mr. Cooney: This letter is to reassure you and the Village that there are no site engineering issues as it relates to the latest site plan for the above referenced project that was recently approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The site engineering will generally follow the engineering shown for the originally submitted site plan. We will work with Public Works, the Building Department, etc. to satisfy any requirements they may have, as we have done in the past on other projects we have worked on in the Village. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns you may have. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, Applied, afddivision of RTJM. Scott DiGilio, P.E. Principal cc: Scott Whisler, Brian Properties engineering consultants 1 715 Ridgeview Drive, McHenry, IL 60050 rtmassociates.com 1 815.578.0200 1 MBE Certified Business sw aw.m:ri.,si:}yiSiia='`'�i:?f�ii3•i�TM�I)i?}:isi�::i::°ii'.•::7i2i{iii�i�i}' i i i�I1B1 J.' MHOIH 15zMH1WN 'M OOZ tura '�:`•:' :': ....�.5„�.---.. L ILI, Z O F-- } W J LU 0 U Z ck� LU CLO O C i mi" co uj 2 N I r4 S of a_ 0 IU_j � F, - CL IL mi" co uj 2 N I r4 S of a_ 0 IU_j � F, - CL rM �� � � \\ \� \� � ( ILI LU ± (� »� \ \ \\ Im \� \� � ( ± (� »� \ \ \\ Im - _ \ \ \ II : - .............. z�\( : 0/ j\\/ { \ \\ } 0 - LU \ ±g�.i(HW77 \ \� ° � }\j} ±g�.i(HW77 " 4 9, 1; r �is aHEd s q cn J—oi Z w C) LU z Z cn LU 0 U a - LU Q Lu LLI LUo r U) I— ti� / o Q cn CLLU �F- CD N Q J � i x 4 n t` lit A I b�tV��,pV��bV�o VV V VVVVVVV �S� a Oa d � 1e �� �.s o►as jo'!os°iz °V — tSS3� b�tV��,pV��bV�o VV V VVVVVVV Village of Mount Prospect T 'I" t Vro,' Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -24-14 LOCATION: 200 W. Northwest Highway PETITIONER: LRA Equities, LLC OWNER: Michael Luber PARCEL #: 08-12-100-013-0000 LOT SIZE: .9783 acres (.9783 sq.ft.) ZONING: 135C Core Central Commercial LAND USE: Commercial REQUEST: Conditional Use for a drive-through LK114 veto ►] �rkj . Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM,M3) FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER AUGUST 7, 2014 AUGUST 28, 2014 PZ -24-14 / 200 W. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY / CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE- THROUGH) A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 28, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by LRA Equities, LLC (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 200 W. Northwest Highway (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use for a drive-through. The Planning and Zoning Commission hearing was properly noticed in the August 13, 2014 edition of the Daily Herald Newspaper. The Petitioner completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and Staff posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is a located on Northwest Highway between Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street. The Subject Property is zoned B5C Core Central Commercial and is considered part of the downtown commercial district. The Subject Property is bordered by the B5C Core Central Commercial to the west, north, and east. The I2 Railroad borders to the south. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval to allow a drive-through as part of a new shopping center. The various elements of the proposed development are outlined below: Site Plan — The Petitioner submitted two site plans ("A" and "B") for the proposed development. The site plans deviate from one another in regards to the extent of the improvements shown on the adjacent property (Mt. Prospect State Bank). Site plan "A" would maintain the existing access drive from Elmhurst Avenue and calls for a twelve (12) foot wide one-way drive aisle adjacent to the drive-through lane. "Do not enter" signs would be provided for the one-way drive -aisle on the bank property. Site Plan `B" would move the Elmhurst Avenue access drive further north, eliminate the drive aisle adjacent to the drive-through lane altogether, and provide a larger parking lot landscape island west of the drive-through lane. Either scenario would require approval from the bank. The remainder of the site improvements would be consistent in each scenario. The building would measure 12,419 square feet in area. Both the building and parking would run parallel to Northwest Highway. In addition to the access drive from Elmhurst Avenue, there would be an access drive from Pine Street. Three outdoor dining areas would be provided; two in the front and a third in the rear. The outdoor dining area in the rear would be PZ -24-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 28, 2014 Page 3 located on the adjacent property, which will require approval from the Village and an agreement as it is owned by the Village. Parking — The Village Code requires four (4) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet in excess of 2,500 square feet of floor area of gross floor area. The proposed 12,419 square foot building requires forty (40) parking spaces. The proposal will meet the required parking spaces by providing fifty (50) parking spaces, including three (3) accessible parking spaces. The Village Code also requires four (4) stacking spaces for the drive through window. The proposal would exceed the minimum stacking required by providing eight (8) stacking spaces. Traffic - The Petitioner submitted a traffic impact study. The study concluded that the number of new trips expected to be generated will not be significant with the majority of the trips diverted from the existing traffic on Northwest Highway. The new traffic generated is projected to have limited impact on the roadway system and adjacent intersections. The study further concludes that geometric modifications or improvements will not be needed or warranted at the intersections of Northwest Highway with Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street. The access drives will provide for direct and convenient access into the site and will operate at acceptable levels of service. The site plan has been designed to provide for adequate on-site circulation and drive-through usage. The stacking area of eight vehicles will be adequate in accommodating the peak traffic operations of the drive-through facility. Trash Enclosure - The site plan indicates a trash enclosure will be located in the drive-through roundabout. A detail plan for the trash enclosure was not submitted. The enclosure will be required to measure at least six (6) feet in height and will be constructed out of brick that will match the brick used for the principal building. The Petitioner will be required to submit a detail plan. Mechanical and Utility Equipment- Roof plans were not submitted. All rooftop mechanical equipment will be required to be completely hidden from view. Further, any ground mounted mechanical and utility equipment will be required to be screened per Village requirements. Building Elevations - The attached elevations plans do not label the building materials, but appear to illustrate the building materials will include brick, stone, and metal canopies. Detailed elevation plans indicating the brick size and type of stone will be required. Modular/standard size brick shall be used. Floor Plan — The floor plan indicates the building will consist of eight (8) tenant units. A Dunkin Donuts is proposed at the west end and a restaurant at the east end of the building. The Dunkin Donuts will include the drive-through. Landscaping - The attached landscape plan details the proposed plant materials and sizes. As currently drawn, the landscape plan does not comply with all of the landscape requirements. The landscape plan will be required to be revised to address the following comments: 1. Replacing the ornamental trees shown in the parking lot landscape islands with recommended shade trees. 2. Providing the required shade trees in the parking lot perimeter landscape areas: a minimum of five (5) shade trees along Northwest Highway and a minimum of two (2) shade trees along Pine Street. Shade trees shall be provided at the equivalent of seventy five feet (75') apart. 3. All planting beds shall be mulched in their entirety with shredded bark or other similar material. The Zoning Ordinance requires the installation of an automatic underground sprinkling system. An irrigation plan was not submitted and will be required for the proposed development. PZ -24-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 28, 2014 Page 4 Lighting Plan — The photometric plan indicates light levels that exceed the Village Code limitations as measured at the east property line. The light levels at the east property line measure up to .9 foot-candles when a maximum .5 foot-candles permitted. Further, the photometric plan does not include uniformity levels for the parking lot. Uniformity levels not exceeding a 3:1(ave./min.) and a 12:1 (max./min.) shall be provided. A fixture cut sheet for the light poles was provided and indicates it will comply with code. Fixture cut sheets for building lighting were not provided. The Petitioner is not seeking relief from the Village's lighting regulations and is required to revise the photometric plan and submit fixture cut sheets for all exterior lighting that comply with Sections 14.314 and 14.2219 of the Villagte Code. Signage — The attached plans indicate the exiting freestanding signs will be removed and reused. The existing freestanding signs are located at the southwest and southeast corners of the Subject Property. Neither of the existing freestanding sign complies with the minimum five (5) foot setback requirement and each is placed within the sight triangle. The Petitioner shall replace the existing signs with new signs that are constructed to match the proposed building materials and locate them to comply with the required five (5) foot setback and outside of the sight triangles. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Land Use Map designates the Subject Property as Central Commercial. The Petitioner's proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation. CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and Per the Petitioner, the proposed drive-through Dunkin Donuts will be an asset to the area. It will help increase the retail traffic and assist future development in the surrounding area. The Dunkin Donuts will be only the 2nd located on Northwest Highway from Des Plaines to Barrington. It will not serve ice cream and will help attract other tenants. The proposed improvements will eliminate the existing curb cut located on Northwest Highway and only utilize access points from Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for a drive-through and feels that it meets the standards for a Conditional Use. The proposed drive-through will comply with the stacking requirements. Further the proposed development will comply with the parking requirements. Staff recommends adding a condition of approval to utilize plan "B" instead of "A" as it would provide for better traffic circulation and minimize any potential vehicle conflict. By relocating the Elmhurst Avenue access further north, eliminating the bank drive aisle adjacent to the drive-through lane altogether, and providing a larger parking lot landscape island west of the drive-through lane, the development will be designed to ensure safe and efficient traffic circulation within the site. PZ -24-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 28, 2014 RECOMMENDATION Page 5 Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motions: "To approve: 1) A Conditional Use to operate a drive-through restaurant; a. Development of the site in general conformance with site plan `B" prepared by Tinaglia Architects dated August 15, 2014. b. Development of the building in conformance with the elevations prepared by Tinaglia Architects dated August 15, 2014. c. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by InSite Landscape Design dated July 16, 2014, but revised as needed to comply with Code. d. Submittal of a photometric (lighting) plan and fixture cut sheets that comply with Village Code requirements. e. Providing a Plat of Easement establishing a cross access easement on the adjacent property. f. Providing an agreement with the Village for use of its property for an outdoor dining area. g. Replacement of the existing nonconforming freestanding signs with new freestanding signs that comply with the Village Sign Code, including a minimum five (5) foot setback from property lines and placement outside of sight triangles. h. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village Codes and regulations including signage. The Village Board's decision is final. I concur: W 11' J. Cooney, AICP Director of Community Development HAPLAMPIanning &Zoi ing COMM\P&Z 2014\SIaIT Rcpods\PZ-24-14 200 W, N.rd w (Hig1. ay.(CU DHv 11 ough),d.. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -24-14 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUEST MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Hearing Date: August 28, 2014 200 W. Northwest Highway LRA Equities, LLC. August 13, 2014 08-12-100-013-0000 Conditional Use for a drive-through Agostino Filippone Thomas Fitzgerald Sharon Otteman William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chairman None Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Scott Whistler, John Luxem, and Jim Tinaglia Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Commissioner Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Youngquist to approve the minutes of the July 24"', 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 7-0 with one Commissioner abstaining. After hearing two (2) additional cases, Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ -24-14, 200 W. Northwest Highway and stated the case was Village Board Final. Ms. Andrade stated that the Petitioner for PZ -24-14 is requesting a Conditional Use for a drive-through establishment as part of a new shopping center at 200 W. Northwest Highway. Ms. Andrade stated the Subject Property is located on the Northwest Highway between Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street. The Subject Property is zoned B5C Core Central Commercial to the west, north, and east. The I2 Railroad borders to the south. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner submitted two (2) site plans for review. Each scenario indicates a 12,419 square foot shopping center with the drive-through establishment located at the west end. The parking would be located along Northwest Highway and the development would be accessed via a drive from Elmhurst Avenue and drive from Pine Street. Planning and Zoning Commission- August 28`, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade explained Site Plan "A" would maintain the existing access drive from Elmhurst Avenue and called for a twelve (12) foot wide one-way drive aisle adjacent to the drive-through lane. She further stated the site plan would require approval from the bank as the drive-through lane would encroach an existing cross access easement that the bank has rights to. Ms. Andrade stated Site Plan `B" would move the Elmhurst Avenue access drive further north, eliminate the drive aisle adjacent to the drive-through lane altogether, and provide a larger parking lot landscape island west of the drive-through lane. The site plan would also require approval from the bank. Ms. Andrade stated each scenario would comply with the parking and stacking requirements. The proposed building would require forty (40) parking spaces and four (4) stacking spaces for the drive through window. The site plans indicate fifty (50) parking spaces and eight (8) stacking spaces. Ms. Andrade stated the proposed elevation plans indicate the proposed building will include brick, stone, and metal canopies. Detailed elevation plans indicating the brick size and type of stone will be required. Ms. Andrade stated the proposed landscape plan indicates it would not comply with all of the landscape requirements. The landscape plan will be required to provide shade trees in the parking lot landscape islands and along the perimeter. Further an automatic underground sprinkling system will be required. Ms. Andrade stated the proposed photometric plan indicates light levels that exceed the Village Code limitation as measured at the east property line. The light levels at the east property line measure up to .9 foot-candles when a maximum .5 foot-candles permitted. She further explained the photometric plan does not include uniformity levels for the parking lot. The Petitioner is not seeking relief from the Village's lighting regulations and is required to revise the photometric plan and submit fixture cut sheets for all exterior lighting that comply with Village Code. Ms. Andrade summarized the standards for Conditional Uses as the following: • The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner indicated the proposed drive-through Dunkin Donuts will be an asset to the area. It will help increase the retail traffic and assist future development in the surrounding area. The Dunkin Donuts will be only the 2nd located on Northwest Highway from Des Plaines to Barrington. She further explained, the proposed improvements will eliminate the existing curb cut located on Northwest Highway and only utilize access points from Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff reviewed the Petitioner's request for a drive-through and felt that it meets the standards for a Conditional Use. She stated the proposed drive-through will comply with the stacking and parking requirements. The Petitioner submitted a traffic impact study that concluded that the new traffic to be generated is projected to have limited impact on the roadway system and adjacent intersections. Planning and Zoning Commission- August 28`, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade stated the traffic study further concluded that geometric modifications or improvements will not be needed or warranted at the intersections of Northwest Highway with Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street. The proposed access drives will provide for direct and convenient access into the site and will operate at acceptable levels of service. Ms. Andrade further stated that Staff recommends adding a condition of approval to utilize site plan `B" instead of "A" as it would provide for better traffic circulation and minimize any potential vehicle conflict. Staff also recommends adding a condition of approval requiring new signs that comply with code instead of reusing the existing signs. Ms. Andrade stated Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motion: "To approve: 1.) A Conditional Use to operate a drive-through restaurant, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. She stated the Village Board's decision is final for the case. Chairman Donnelly asked if the drive through is the only item that needs approval. Ms. Andrade stated that was correct. Commissioner Youngquist asked if the proposed plan was included in the downtown implementation plan. Mr. Simmons stated the Village provided the downtown plans and had discussions with the developer regarding the guidelines for possible development opportunities. He further explained the developer decided to continue with the proposed plan. Commissioner Youngquist stated that the downtown plan's executive summary did not recommend a multi-tenant/strip center for the subject property. Mr. Simmons responded that the downtown implementation plan is purely conceptual and that Staff worked with the developer to integrate some of those concepts to the proposed development. Commissioner Youngquist stated the type of development being proposed limits the creativity because of where the parking is located. Commissioner Mizwicki asked if the drive-through is going through the parking lot. Ms. Andrade stated that the drive-through is located on the west end of the property and is not necessarily going through the principal parking lot. Commissioner Mizwicki stated the majority of the Dunkin Donuts are partnered with Baskin Robbins, and asked how they can ensure Capannari's Ice Cream won't have direct competition with them. Mr. Simmons stated the Village can't restrict any retail establishment from selling ice cream in the Subject Property because it is a permitted use in the zoning district. Planning and Zoning Commission- August 28`, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Chairman Donnelly swore in Scott Whistler (LRA Equities) 1413 E. Wing Street, Arlington Heights, Illinois; John Luxem (Dunkin Donuts) 210 N. Stratton Lane, Mount Prospect, Illinois; and Jim Tinaglia (Tinaglia Architects) 107 W. Hawthorne, Arlington Heights, Illinois. Mr. Whistler stated they have been working with Staff for the past few months to come up with a plan that works best for the site. He stated the two proposed site plans seem to be the best options at this point. Mr. Tinaglia stated they have brought several experts that are working on the project as well. Such as a traffic engineer and civil engineer who can answer questions in more detail. Mr. Tinaglia addressed Commissioner Youngquist's concerns about the positioning of the building and how the plan will work well on the site. Mr. Tinaglia stated they chose to move forward with the proposed site plan because it works best economically for the usability of the site. He further stated his client likes the design of the building and is being mindful of the backside of the building that is facing the park and Capannari's. Mr. Tinaglia explained their plan to create painted murals by artists in the community to have along the back of the building. Commissioner Beattie asked if the Petitioner has spoken with the Village regarding the use of part of the park as outdoor dining for one of the proposed restaurant spaces. Mr. Tinaglia stated it is strictly an idea and they have approached the Village about using a portion as outdoor dining space. He stated they understand it is something they need to work out with the Village as an option and are flexible with that aspect of the project. Commissioner Beattie asked what kind of tenants they are targeting for the retail spaces because the spaces seem very small. Mr. Whistler stated that the spaces could be combined to make a bigger space if the tenant needs bigger space. Commissioner Beattie asked how the bank feels about part of the drive-through turnaround abutting into their easement. Mr. Whistler stated they have been working with Staff and the bank to come up with an agreement that will work for both parties. Mr. Tinaglia stated the easement is currently non-functional and was used for larger trucks to turn into and make deliveries. He further stated there are no trucks speculated to use that easement, and if the proposed change is made the bank is aware they would gain two (2) extra parking stalls and extra landscaping island. Mr. Beattie stated while he understands the concept he does not feel this is the right space for a strip center because it goes against the downtown implementation plan. Commissioner Youngquist asked why they could not have a concept with parking behind the building. Planning and Zoning Commission- August 28`, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Mr. Whistler stated they feel building the structure right up on the roadway is not a good option for that particular space. He further stated if the Subject Property was in more of a pedestrian friendly area that concept could work. There was general discussion between the board and the Petitioner regarding the proposed plan and how it does not fit in with the downtown plan. Commissioner Youngquist stated the residents of Mount Prospect are not going to benefit from the drive through and that it is not right for the space. He also commented that there are four (4) Dunkin Donuts in the Village and that there is not a viable reason to put a drive-through at the Subject Property. Mr. Luxem stated the Dunkin Donuts' are located on the outskirts of town and feels that the location of the Subject Property would be ideal because of the proximity to the train. Commissioner Youngquist asked if the Dunkin Donuts could be built without the drive-through. Mr. Luxem explained that he would prefer not to do that because they do forty percent (40%) of their business from the drive-through. He explained that customers prefer using the drive-through as oppose to coming into the restaurant because of the convenience factor. Commissioner Beattie reiterated the fact that although the project is nice it does not fit in with the proposed concepts of the downtown plan that the Village has come up with. Commissioner Mizwicki asked where the deliveries will be made and the where the trash will be held for all of the tenants. Mr. Simmons stated there is a service walk behind the building that leads to the trash enclosure and that deliveries will be made in the front of the building. Commissioner Youngquist stated that the designated area for the trash enclosure is not big enough for the entire building. Chairman Donnelly asked if the Petitioner understood and accepted all of the conditions that were added to the motion by Staff. The Petitioner stated they understood and accepted. Chairman Donnelly asked the board if they had any further questions or comments for the Petitioner, hearing none he opened the public portion of the case. Chairman Donnelly swore in Marlys Weary 15 S. Pine Street #404, President of the Shires at Clock Tower Place Condominium Association, and Alice Summers 15 S. Pine Street #300. Ms. Weary asked if any of the business would have late night licenses; and stated their concerns about the entrance way on Pine Street. She further explained traffic could cause difficulties with parking on Pine Street which is already an issue. Ms. Summers stated that her main concerns were the garbage issue and the amount of traffic turning onto Pine Street from Northwest Highway. Planning and Zoning Commission- August 28`, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Chairman Donnelly swore in Adam Fishman 301 W. Central Road from Dog Play Daycare. Mr. Fishman stated that his only concern was parking. He stated he thinks the project is needed in that area but feels taking away public parking spots will become a major issue. He said he is in support of site plan A, but thinks site plan B is not conducive to the lack of parking that already exists. Commissioner Youngquist asked Mr. Fishman where the parking is located for his building. Mr. Fishman stated he only has 2-3 spots for parking on the side of his building. Commissioner Youngquist asked how many customers the Dog Day Care has on average daily. Mr. Fishman stated around one hundred (100) total a day. Chairman Donnelly swore in Linda Larson 1401 W. Cleaven Mount Prospect, Illinois and John Green 531 W. Dundee Buffalo Grove, Illinois; both representing Mount Prospect State Bank. Mr. Green stated the Bank is supportive of the project. He further explained they understand some of the comments the board has made to the Petitioner because the Bank had to address the same concerns when they were developing the Bank. Mr. Green stated the shared easement between the Bank and the Subject Property isn't an issue; however, the Bank cannot agree to either site plan at this point because they have only been aware of it for the past week. He further stated that the Bank is willing to talk and come to an agreement that would respect the ingress and egress requirements that the Bank has. Mr. Green stated the one and only ingress and egress for the Bank is affected by each of the proposed site plans. He further stated that if the board decides to approve the project, the Bank asks that there be some time allotted for the Bank and the Petitioner to discuss and come to an agreement regarding the shared easement. Commissioner Youngquist asked if the Bank used the parking located closer to Northwest Highway through the cross easement agreement. Mr. Green stated the customers are limited to the parking area closer to the Bank; he further stated they do not see the parking as an issue just mainly the traffic flow coming into and out of the site. Chairman Donnelly called the Petitioner back to the stand to address the issues from the residents. Mr. Whistler stated they do not anticipate having any businesses that would require a late night license. He stated the restaurant use would need to comply with code. Mr. Simmons stated any business would need to comply with the hours of operation and any outdoor dining establishments would have to follow the outdoor dining regulations which would limit them to close the outdoor seating component at 11:00 pm. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner to address the issue of the increased traffic on Pine. Mr. Whistler stated that there currently is a curb cut on Pine Street. He stated any type of development is going to need some type of access onto Pine Street. The proposed development excluded the curb cut on Northwest Highway for safety reasons. Planning and Zoning Commission- August 28`, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner to address the parking issues along Elmhurst. Mr. Whistler stated the elimination of the two spots along Elmhurst should not affect the area too much considering the project is over parked in comparison of what is being proposed. Chairman Donnelly asked what the hours of operation would be for the shopping center. Mr. Luxem stated that Dunkin Donuts would be open from 5:00 am until 11:00 pm. Mr. Whistler stated the parking on Pine Street should not be an issue because they are providing plenty of parking onsite for the center. Chairman Donnelly asked if the Petitioner would be willing to continue the case until the next Planning and Zoning meeting so they can have time to address the issues brought up at the meeting. Mr. Whistler said that he would be willing to continue the case. A resident who did not identify himself stated the existing curb cut on Pine Street is farther north than the proposed curb cut which is an inevitable result of moving the parking lot to the front of the center. He further stated that the proposed businesses would generate a lot more traffic than the previous tenants. Mr. Simmons stated that Staff feels the proposed stacking would be adequate for the amount of traffic that will be generated from the site. He further stated the drive-through location on the western side of the entrance provided a little more room for stacking as opposed to the eastern side of the site. Mr. Simmons further explained that on -street parking will be more convenient for existing businesses and for the residents along Pine Street; and by moving the entrance closer there will be enough space for a vehicle to stop and wait for other vehicles exiting the site. Commissioner Fitzgerald made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie to continue the case PZ -24- 14 to the September 25t1 Planning and Zoning meeting. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Beattie, Youngquist, Kueter, Mizwicki, Otteman, Fitzgerald, Donnelly NAYS: NONE The motion to continue the case to the September 25th meeting was approved 7-0. After hearing one (1) additional case Commissioner Beattie Commissioner Otteman made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie and the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 pm. Jenna Moder Jenna Moder, Administrative Assistant Community Development Department Planning and Zoning Commission- August 28t, 2014 PZ -24-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair AxrL i 2 1 1 Pm.. onm, Irre. 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 I Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 I f: 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: Scott Whisler LRA Equities, LLC FROM: Javier Millan Senior Consultant Luay Aboona, PE Principal DATE: July 31, 2014 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Study Proposed Retail Center Mount Prospect, Illinois This memorandum summarizes the methodologies, results and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for a proposed retail center to be located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Northwest Highway (U.S. Route 14) and Pine Street in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The site is currently occupied by two vacant retail stores and a surface parking lot. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The development will consist of an approximately 12,333 square -foot building containing a coffee shop with a drive—through lane, a sit-down restaurant and general retail stores. Access will be provided on Pine Street and on Elmhurst Avenue via cross -access connection to the Mount Prospect State Bank. The purpose of this study was to examine existing traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development would have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate development -generated traffic. The sections of this memorandum present the following. • Existing roadway conditions • A description of the site development • Directional distribution of the development generated traffic • Vehicle trip generation for the development • Future traffic conditions including access to the site • Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours • Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access system and adjacent roadway network KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants Site Location W Figure 1 ro WT ayerSt } E ThayerSl �0 z ° z m est a 3 a W Henry '7 St W Henry St E Henry St p E Hen Eleu e� HEARTH AND z z cn HOME IHC ` US Past Office • W Prospect Park District as The BBIIPark in ®�rd Prospect ra rn W Central Rd W Ce E CentralDr ar'Prospect s Public Library g t'Yp w»' cn 4'BUsse roS '�e�,r ra ... Blues Bar, r g rn m Ave �w N Owen Pa. Chase N Bank rn c� Games Plus(® Emerson's Ale House T o o 0 A e ➢ Mt Prosp El ra P�serpr N > W Evergreen Ave W Evergreen Ave ENa s N m a Er � ® Ps �y a d A 7 rn by ' W Milburn Ave � c� ee va N c m t� 14 PPra °?h W Milburn Ave n Lincoln Middle School i Si a � ftl ��, St Raymond School; ._ rn St Raymonds Church . Av - a a q W Lincoln St a oln SS ;: ELincoln.St h ro Site Location W Figure 1 - .., i��r Site Location The site is located near downtown Mount Prospect between Pine Street and Elmhurst Avenue on the north side of Northwest Highway. Land uses include Mobile Print, Inc., Capannari Ice Cream, Moehling Park, and Mount Prospect State Bank to the north. The Clocktower Condominium buildings are located in the northeast quadrant of Pine Street and Northwest Highway. Existing Conditions Existing roadway and traffic conditions near the site were documented based on field visits and traffic counts. The following provides a detailed description of the physical characteristics of the roadways including geometry and traffic control, adjacent land uses and peak hour traffic flows along area roadways. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roads near the site are illustrated in Figure 3 and described below. Northwest Highway (U.S. Route 14) is a northwest -southeast road that serves as the site's southern boundary providing regional access to the area. In the site vicinity, Northwest Highway provides a four -lane cross-section providing two through lanes in each direction with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (mph). No exclusive turn lanes are provided on either approach at its unsignalized intersections with Pine Street and Elmhurst Avenue. On -street parking is prohibited on both sides of the road. Northwest Highway is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), carries an average daily traffic of 13,300 vehicles and is not designated as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA) in the vicinity of the site. Pine Street is a north -south local road that provides one lane in each direction. At its unsignalized intersection with Northwest Highway, Pine Street is under stop sign control and provides a shared left/right-turn lane. The south approach of the intersection is an exit only Metra parking lot access drive and it provides one outbound lane under stop control. On -street four-hour angle parking is provided on the west side of this street while on -street parking is prohibited on the east side of the street. Pine Street has a posted speed limit of 20 mph and is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect. Elmhurst Avenue is a north -south local road that provides one lane in each direction. At its unsignalized "T" intersection with Northwest Highway, Elmhurst Avenue is under stop sign control and provides a shared left/right-turn lane. Elmhurst Avenue provides perpendicular parking on the east and west sides of the roadway limited to two hours between 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. Elmhurst Avenue has a posted speed limit of 20 mph and is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect. M Lu J Q U U) l'a 4 0 O z N w D 3—He O Z _ U p W > Q cc Cl) U O v o z o 0 CO 47 CD LL aoa J Z Al U O �Q U O� PINE STREET 0 Z 1 1 — Y U wa 1 Lu1 C) 1 F-1 r_ 1 1 U C/) 1 1 � 1 1 0 W Y L - m .J � fA � to d Z V) a Lu V Lu X W cr aw Ya M � � a �► z a Z� m Dv") O '11 ELMHURST AVENUE 20 t w L (n O O ` r -, U - C7 '- W H _ �"'- Q Z v CL F_ CD Of Cl) ui Lu Z75J LZ i d Lu LLJ (� d F- = W = � Cn U) 0- U) U 0-0 W (n z x Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts at the following intersections: 1. Northwest Highway and Pine Street 2. Northwest Highway and Elmhurst Street 3. Elmhurst Street and Bank Access Drive The traffic counts were conducted on Thursday July 10t1i, 2014 during the weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.), and the weekday afternoon (4:00 to 6:00 P.M.) peak traffic periods. Based on the results of the traffic counts (copies of the traffic count sheets are enclosed in the Appendix), it was determined that the weekday morning peak hour occurs between 7:15 and 8:15 A.M., and the weekday afternoon peak hour occurs between 5:00 and 6:00 P.M. The existing peak -hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4. The existing peak -hour pedestrian and bicycle volumes are shown in Figure 4a. Area Traffic Observations Traffic flow in the area was observed during the peak periods. Below is a summary of these observations. • The maximum southbound queue on Elmhurst Avenue at its intersection with Northwest Highway was two vehicles (once during the morning peak hour and twice during the evening peak hour) with an average queue of one vehicle. • These observed queues cleared very quickly as a result of the gaps in the Northwest Highway traffic stream and did not hinder the ingress/egress accessibility of the bank access drive. • Queues from the bank access drive at its intersection with Elmhurst Avenue did not exceed one vehicle. • The maximum southbound queue on Pine Street at its intersection with Northwest Highway was one vehicle. no H U L Y az V) Q am cr aL �a z� 0V) 0 m Lu J Q U U) 0 H O z ! v ai LL W O N V) �� W o z L N 3— �W o 0z U Y►z Q U O 0 0 co 'z T Al i o 'j' ^ L 0 (2) �� u 0 (7) (z r 0 (16) ,l PINE STREET 0 z — Y J � xa La 0 m a (a) --�' 7 (IU --- 0 - AVENUE ------------ . 6 (12) 1 t 1 3 (4)Lo 1 �� 1 1 LO 1 1 1 Lu 1 1 y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L. — . — . — . — y .. W L U 2 (2) Wau 22 (15) YD rn z _� m o c, L.......... 7 ............... 7 .................................................... M *1 2(7)� �� t 5 (6) o+ � cn b- cn Ln a LO 0 ao (0 ui o r I..1. 1 z O O W = _ CD Y Y L Q Q J W W Q a O O O O v E 0 U M C X W w L (n v O a) L) U +� v v � Of cn O T L =a w. U C F v � U 0-0 w c/) 2 0 Lu J Q U O O z N �� W� 3— az `- W pC W N W U U OLL v o z o Y� - Q U O N Al a Z'1 c} a PINE STREET m - �� = a ► ►t > wa .. y v o W 2 � m cu 1 1 M 1 1 U) . v a c} L. y a WY —. —. — - —Cn O) dz W C V) U m 3 c L)W C/) aw Ya _ w � a1 z N z� an Dv") a_ ELMHURST AVENUE N_ Q d LO O w J 1 � o w J W L L LI. O L d) .O a Z O O Z W = _ > U LU �W J W W Lou U (� U +� v F-� 2 w U Cl) WOC Q d m T O 2 00 2 1 U C Oj p 0 .. o w o O 2 U) z c � O o � oc Traffic Characteristics of the Mixed -Use Development In order to evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Site and Development Plan The site is currently occupied by two vacant stores and a surface parking lot. The existing building and surface parking lot will be razed and, as proposed, the site will be developed with a 12,333 square -foot building containing a coffee shop with a drive-through lane, a sit down restaurant and general retail stores. Site Access Access to the development is proposed to be provided via two full ingress/egress access drives. One access drive will be located on Pine Street approximately 30 feet north of Northwest Highway and will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements under stop sign control while the second access will be off Elmhurst Avenue via a cross -access connection through the Mount Prospect State Bank parcel. The existing access drive on Elmhurst Avenue provides one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements under stop sign control. With the provisions of two access drives on two separate roads, the site has been designed with maximum site access flexibility. The development -generated traffic will be able to access the site from Pine Street and Elmhurst Avenue. As such, the design of the access system will help minimize the impact of the development by distributing the traffic along the roadway system and ensuring that a single external intersection is not overloaded with development -generated traffic. Directional Distribution of Site Traffic The directional distribution was estimated based on the existing travel patterns as determined from the traffic counts. The anticipated directional distribution of site traffic are shown in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 5. Table 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRAFFIC To/From Percentage Distribution East on Northwest Highway 45% West on Northwest Highway 45% North on Pine Street 5% North on Elmhurst Avenue 5% Total: 100% I Lu J Q U U) O0 O z ■�• ui Q - V) �� W� 3— 0z > pC W N 2 W O v o z o LO 47 CD LL Y �Q U O 00 Al J Z !► c} a PINE STREET ' z J cr •0 =a 1 1 Ld 0 1 1 1 � 1 cu0 1 y 1 0 1 1 U 1 1 0 1 1 � U � d Z W Cl) Sri Q W W 000 cr V acc aw Yo � z �a a Z m ON 0 ELMHURST AVENUE 5% z 0 D L (n O } m C C a m__ U C7 '- =W z W v F- W LLJ O w cc U �' �y w w a x .�• a c �-=) Ln a) :3 o W n c z� O o 0 Site Traffic Generation The estimates of traffic to be generated by the overall site are based upon the proposed land use types and sizes. The volume of traffic generated by the coffee shop with a drive-through lane, the sit-down restaurant, and the remaining retail square footage were estimated using data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. Surveys conducted by ITE have shown that a considerable number of trips made to coffee shops are diverted from existing passing traffic. This is particularly true during the weekday morning and evening peak hours when traffic is diverted from the home -to -work and work -to -home trips. Such diverted trips are referred to as pass -by traffic. These surveys indicate that on average 89 percent of the peak hour trips generated by a coffee shop are diverted from existing traffic on the adjacent roads. As such, a pass -by reduction of 80 percent was applied to the traffic volumes generated by the coffee shop with drive-through lane. No pass -by reductions were applied to the other land uses. The total trips anticipated with this development are detailed in Table 2. This development is expected to generate 42 and 68 new two-way vehicle -trips during the weekday morning and evening peak hours, respectively. Table 2 ESTIMATED SITE -GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ITE Land Use Code A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Type/Size In Out In Out 937 Drive -Through Coffee Shop -1860 s.f. 932 High Turnover Restaurant - 3,213 s.f. 826 Specialty Retail - 7,260 s.f. Less 80% pass -by reduction' Subtotal Total New Trips 95 92 40 40 - - 19 13 3 2 9 11 98 94 68 64 -75 -75 -32 -32 23 19 36 32 1 - Pass -by reduction applied only to trips generated by the drive-through coffee shop 11 Site Traffic Assignment The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour new site -generated trips that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution as illustrated in Figure 6. Figure 7 illustrates the pass -by trips that will be generated by the coffee shop. Background Development Traffic Growth In addition to the site traffic, in order to account for other growth in the area, and based on the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) year 2040 population and employment projections, the existing traffic volumes were increased one-half percent per year over six years, to project year 2020 conditions. Total Projected Traffic Volumes The new peak -hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed development (Figure 6) and the pass - by traffic volumes (Figure 7) were combined with the background development traffic growth volumes to determine the projected year 2020 total peak -hour traffic volumes, which are shown in Figure 8. Evaluation and Recommendations Traffic analyses were performed for the external intersections and the two site access driveways to determine the operation of the existing roadway system, evaluate the impact of the proposed mixed- use development, and determine the ability of the existing roadway system to accommodate projected traffic demands. Analyses were performed for the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours for both the existing traffic volumes and the year 2020 total projected traffic volumes upon development of the site. 12 Lu J Q U � o H O N W� 3— az `- r 10 (16) I (2) N Q _ co W > Qo W N W U U lT o la Iz o 0) Y� Q U O aZ u a PINE STREET � � � f 0 zY 1 7 (7) � 1 (7) 1 M►� U) a, J xQ E w a O 0 1 1 1 LJJ � 1 a� 1 1 � 1 1 a 1 1 (D U 1....... i= fn WY NQ y..� V)Q co V W N 000z cr � L 10 (16) Qcc CL Li Yo a 2 (2) z z�- _ m tD� DV) m_ : ELMHURST AVENUE 1 (7) t w 7 (7)~ Z co Q a _a ao co LO O L O O ` r D Z) U= �- 2 z O O —_� w = _ `� ami _ IW- CD Y Y v ~= W J w w O _ Q a wa ►- D F L)0-0 z O W U) O O 0 x M Lu U) a z V) cr Lu 3 — az `- r +30 (+16) �+ cD ,n * Lu > oC Lu W U U 3ii OO �o z o ti 0) Y� Q U O 00 �° \ Al J Z �► U O p U + 'i PINE STREET . n _ ! � 1 0 +45 (+16) z 1 1 c Wa m LV 1 � 1Lo 1 1 Q 1 1 L2 4- 1 1 ~ m � � cu d Z M W V)Q + UW 000 �► L +45 (+16) U aoc M W Yo � z �Q Z� m D v) , ELMHURST AVENUE +30 (+16) t w iD Q d ? Ln o o LO v ao co + LOo O O } ~ C C a m- U= �- D O Z) O —_� z Lu ami _ IW- CD Y Y v O_ ~= W J W W O _ Q a wa L)0-0 z O w U) 00 0 J a o I._._._._ d z o � .4— 10 (34) (04 W U L 57 (34) v -w Q a r 40 (32) w � Q 10 (1o) U) C Z 7 all m D� z p �M M•� ELMHURST 1 T- a)CD Y Y v O_ I (2) Q Cl) J W w O _ N O > z Q a M F v V) O p w U) 00 O c W W� N 3— �w az `- U Y rn Q UO 00 ►to v ..Al i o N L 0 (2) �Q �f 0 (7) 02 rou7l,� PINE STREET 1 . .58 (35) � 1 � t Z ' 4 (11) = UD —Y co.. xQ 1 1 0 ui W � 1 � 1 1 1 v♦ 1 1 1 1 1 1 H `d W Y a o I._._._._ d z o � G'O " ap On On (04 W U L 57 (34) v -w Q a 23 a5) cc w � Q 10 (1o) ^ Y LO z C Z 7 all m D� z p �M M•� ELMHURST 1 AVENUE 3 (14) t 42 (29) --i LO I v� �v v v E 0 U (6 v U v O O N O N c� m LO a o w tz ao 6 v O C a) — U= z p p — Lu = T- a)CD Y Y v O_ Lu Q Q Cl) J W W O Q a C.) c F v L)0-0 O p w U) 00 O d n Traffic Analysis The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2000. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter grade from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. Control delay is that portion of the total delay attributed to the traffic signal or stop sign control operation, and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Level of Service A is the highest grade (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at -capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest grade (oversaturated conditions, extensive delays). Typically, Level of Service D is the lowest acceptable grade for peak -hour conditions in an urban environment, such as Mount Prospect. For two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersections, levels of service are only calculated for the approaches controlled by a stop sign (not for the intersection as a whole). The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for unsignalized intersections are shown in Table 3. Summaries of the capacity analysis results are presented in Tables 4 and 5. (Copies of the capacity analyses worksheets are included in the Appendix.) Table 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay (SECNEH) A 0-10 B > 10 - 15 C >15-25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F > 50 Source: HiOnt-ay CapaciNManual, 2010. 16 Table 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY Weekday A.M. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Northwest Highway/Pine Streets • Southbound Left/Right B 14.0 C 24.5 • Northbound Left/Through/Right A 0.0 D 29.3 • Eastbound Left/Through A 8.1 A 9.2 Northwest Highway/Elmhurst Avenue • Southbound Left/Right B 11.0 C 17.2 • Eastbound Left/Through A 8.1 A 9.2 Elmhurst Avenue/Access Drivel A 8.4 A 8.5 1 - Two-way stop controlled intersection LOS - Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 17 Table 5 FUTURE CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY Weekday A.M Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Northwest Highway/Pine Streets • Southbound Left/Right C 18.7 D 31.7 • Northbound Left/Through/Right A 0.0 D 32.4 • Eastbound Left/Through A 8.1 A 9.3 Northwest Highway/Elmhurst Avenue • Southbound Left/Right B 10.1 C 16.6 • Eastbound Left/Through A 8.3 A 9.4 Elmhurst Avenue/Access Drives A 9.1 A 8.9 Pine Street/Access Drive A 8.5 A 8.5 1 - Two-way stop controlled intersection LOS - Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. IN Traffic Evaluation The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the turning movements in and out of the study intersection are currently operating at an overall acceptable Level of Service D or better during the peak hours. Under future conditions, the analyses indicate that acceptable levels of service will be maintained for all turning movements. This indicates that the proposed development traffic will not have a significant impact on the operation of the intersections. Further inspection of the capacity analyses indicate that the southbound 95th percentile queues on Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street will continue to be 25 feet or less. It should be noted that, while queuing of southbound traffic on Elmhurst Road and Pine Street at their respective intersection with Northwest Highway could potentially extend to or beyond the access drives, it will not be a recurring situation as our observations indicated that queued vehicles cleared the intersection very quickly. This is due, as previously indicated, to the availability of gaps in the Northwest Highway through traffic stream created by the traffic signals to the east at Main Street and to the west at Central Road. Based on a review of the projected traffic volumes and the turn lane guidelines found in IDOT's Bureau of Design and Environment (BDE) Manual, the provision of exclusive left -turn and right -turn lanes will not be warranted on Northwest Highway at its intersections with Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street will not be warranted. Site Access As previously indicated, access to the development is proposed to be provided via two full ingress/egress access drives. One access drive will be located on Pine Street approximately 30 feet north of Northwest Highway while the other will be utilizing the existing access drive off Elmhurst Avenue via a cross access connection to the adjoining Mount Prospect State Bank parcel. Based on the results of the capacity analyses, all turning movements in and out of the access drives will operate at a level of service A with minimal queues. Although the access drive off Elmhurst Avenue is an existing access drive, KLOA, Inc. conducted an auto turn run to determine if vehicle traveling northwest on Northwest Highway can perform a right -turn on Elmhurst Avenue and immediately turn right into the access drive. As can be seen from the exhibit included in the Appendix, vehicles can make these turns without encroaching on the opposing lanes. As such, no geometric modifications will be necessary. 19 On -Site Circulation and Drive -Through Stacking The proposed on-site circulation calls for two-way traffic through the parking lot with the coffee shop drive-through lane providing one-way clockwise circulation. The drive-through facility will be located on the west side of the building with traffic entering from the south. The drive- through will be accessible from the parking lot. Traffic exiting the drive-through lane should be under stop sign control. The drive-through lane will provide stacking for a total of approximately eight vehicles. The proposed eight vehicle stacking will be adequate in accommodating the peak demand of the proposed facility, especially during the morning peak period based on surveys conducted by KLOA, Inc. of similar drive-through facilities which indicated that the average queues are typically six vehicles and that a maximum queue of nine vehicles occurred infrequently. Conclusion and Recommendations Based on the proposed development plans and the preceding traffic impact study, the following conclusions and recommendations are made. • Overall, the number of new trips expected to be generated by the proposed retail center will not be significant with the majority of the trips diverted from the existing traffic on Northwest Highway. • The addition of the new traffic generated by the proposed development is projected to have limited impact on the roadway system and adjacent intersections. • Geometric modifications or improvements will not be needed or warranted at the intersections of Northwest Highway with Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street. • The access drives will provide for direct and convenient access into the site and will operate at acceptable levels of service. • The site plan has been designed to provide for adequate on-site circulation and drive-through usage. • The stacking area of eight vehicles will be adequate in accommodating the peak traffic operations of the drive-through facility. 20 Appendix - Traffic Counts - Capacity Analyses - AutoTurn Exhibit Traffic Counts Mt. Prospect, IL Approach Totals Weather: Exit Sunny and Warm Int Time ----------------------------------- 07/14/14 Northwest Hwy and Elmhurst Ave N ------------------------------ E S W Total ----- ----------------------------------- 700 10 12:00:39 Thursday July 10, 2014 4 0 6 ----- 33 715 7 5 0 19 24 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: by Movement 5 6 0 Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- # 3 northwest/elmhurst 0 4 29 745 9 7 -------------------------------------------------------------- Begin N -Approach 15 E -Approach S -Approach 0 W -Approach Int Time RT ------------------- TH LT -------------- RT TH LT -------------- RT TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ------------------- 700 6 0 -------------- 4 5 0 -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 18 ----- 33 715 5 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 31 730 4 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 29 745 4 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 800 2 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 26 815 2 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 22* 830 2 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 17* 845 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8* ------------------- 1600 14 0 -------------- 2 15 0 -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 14 ----- 45 1615 11 0 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 40 1630 11 0 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 1645 5 0 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 31 1700 6 0 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 30 1715 4 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 23* 1730 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 16* 1745 4 ------------------- ------------------- 0 0 -------------- -------------- 1 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 4 9* ----- ----- TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection # 3 northwest/elmhurst Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----------------------------------- N E S W N ------------------------------ E S W Total ----- ----------------------------------- 700 10 5 0 18 ------------------------------ 23 4 0 6 ----- 33 715 7 5 0 19 24 2 0 5 31 730 5 6 0 18 24 1 0 4 29 745 9 7 0 15 22 5 0 4 31 800 8 7 0 11 18 6 0 2 26 815 8 6 0 8 14 6 0 2 22* 830 8 4 0 5 9 6 0 2 17* 845 4 1 0 3 4 2 0 2 8* ----------------------------------- 1600 16 15 0 14 ------------------------------ 29 2 0 14 ----- 45 1615 15 12 0 13 25 4 0 11 40 1630 19 12 0 11 23 8 0 11 42 1645 12 10 0 9 19 7 0 5 31 1700 13 9 0 8 17 7 0 6 30 1715 9 6 0 8 14 5 0 4 23* 1730 5 4 0 7 11 1 0 4 16* 1745 ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 4 1 0 4 5 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 0 0 4 9* ----- ----- Mt. Prospect, IL Weather: Sunny and Warm Northwest Hwy and Pine St Thursday July 10, 2014 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: by Movement Begin Time 700 715 730 745 800 815 830 845 1600 1615 1630 1645 1700 1715 1730 1745 Intersection # 1 northwest/pine N -Approach RT TH LT 3 0 7 3 0 6 3 0 6 3 0 3 5 0 7 5 0 5 5 0 4 4 0 4 -------------- 6 0 7 4 0 7 4 0 11 6 0 12 4 0 12 4 0 11 4 0 5 1 0 1 E -Approach RT TH LT 3 341 0 5 371 0 7 390 0 6 385 0 6 384 0 4 292 0 1 190 0 1 94 0 -------------- 4 654 0 4 685 0 11 701 0 15 684 0 17 702 0 15 538 0 8 353 0 3 206 0 S -Approach RT TH LT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------- 2 0 6 2 0 6 3 1 6 3 6 13 2 7 16 2 7 16 0 6 10 0 1 3 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Begin Time 700 715 730 745 800 815 830 845 1600 1615 1630 1645 1700 1715 1730 1745 Intersection # 1 northwest/pine Approach Totals N E S W 10 344 0 554 9 376 0 586 9 397 0 552 6 391 0 540 12 390 0 541 10 296 0 395 9 191 0 270 8 95 0 129 ------------------------------ 13 658 8 585 11 689 8 589 15 712 10 613 18 699 22 604 16 719 25 662 15 553 25 520 9 361 16 349 2 209 4 205 W -Approach RT TH LT 0 550 4 0 581 5 0 546 6 0 534 6 0 535 6 0 391 4 0 267 3 0 128 1 -------------- 0 579 6 0 584 5 0 605 8 0 597 7 0 652 10 0 511 9 0 344 5 0 202 3 Appr/Exit Totals Exit Totals N E S W 7 557 0 344 10 587 0 374 13 552 0 393 12 537 0 388 12 542 0 389 8 396 0 297 4 271 0 195 2 132 0 98 ------------------------------ 10 588 0 666 9 593 0 695 20 619 0 711 28 612 0 703 34 666 0 722 31 524 0 558 19 349 0 367 7 203 0 210 07/14/14 11:55:36 Int Total 908 971 958 937 943 701* 470* 232* 1264 1297 1350 1343 1422 1113* 735* 420* Int Total 908 971 958 937 943 701* 470* 232* 1264 1297 1350 1343 1422 1113* 735* 420* Mt. Prospect, IL Weather: Sunny and Warm 07/14/14 Elmhurst Ave and Bank Access Drive 12:02:48 Thursday July 10, 2014 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: by Movement Intersection # 4 elmhurst/bankacc Begin N -Approach E -Approach S -Approach W -Approach Int Time ----- RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ----- 700 -------------- 0 0 5 -------------- 1 0 0 -------------- 1 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 ----- 7 715 0 0 8 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 730 0 0 6 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 11 745 0 0 5 1 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 14 800 0 0 9 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 19 815 0 0 6 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 15* 830 0 0 5 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 12* 845 0 0 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 7* ----- 1600 -------------- 0 0 7 -------------- 2 0 6 -------------- 6 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 ----- 21 1615 0 0 6 5 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 20 1630 0 0 8 5 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 1645 0 0 8 5 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 1700 0 0 8 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 1715 0 0 6 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 10* 1730 0 0 4 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 8* 1745 ----- ----- 0 -------------- -------------- 0 1 0 -------------- -------------- 0 1 1 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 3* ----- ----- TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection # 4 elmhurst/bankacc Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----------------------------------- N E S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- ----------------------------------- 700 5 1 1 ------------------------------ 0 1 6 0 0 ----- 7 715 8 1 2 0 1 10 0 0 11 730 6 1 4 0 1 10 0 0 11 745 5 2 7 0 1 12 1 0 14 800 9 3 7 0 0 16 3 0 19 815 6 3 6 0 0 12 3 0 15* 830 5 3 4 0 0 9 3 0 12* 845 4 2 1 0 0 5 2 0 7* ----------------------------------- 1600 7 8 6 ------------------------------ 0 2 13 6 0 ----- 21 1615 6 9 5 0 5 11 4 0 20 1630 8 9 2 0 5 10 4 0 19 1645 8 9 2 0 5 10 4 0 19 1700 8 6 2 0 4 10 2 0 16 1715 6 2 2 0 1 8 1 0 10* 1730 4 2 2 0 1 6 1 0 8* 1745 ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 1 1 1 0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 0 2 1 0 3* ----- ----- Mt. Prospect, IL Weather: Sunny and Warm 07/14/14 Northwest Highway and Elmhurst Ave 12:04:50 Thursday July 10, 2014 Pedestrians Only TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: by Movement Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- # 5 northwest/elmhurst/peds Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- P -Approach E -Approach S -Approach W -Approach Int Time ----- AE TH -------------- AB -------------- RT TH LT RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ----- 700 -------------- 11 0 -------------- 2 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 ----- 0 13 715 12 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 730 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 745 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 800 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 815 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7* 830 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4* 845 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* ----- 1600 -------------- 16 0 -------------- 1 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 ----- 0 17 1615 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1630 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1645 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1700 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1715 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11* 1730 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9* 1745 ----- ----- 1 0 -------------- -------------- 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 1* ----- ----- TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- # 5 northwest/elmhurst/peds Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----- P ------------------------------ E S W ------------------------------ P E S W Total ----- ----- 700 ------------------------------ 13 0 0 0 ------------------------------ 0 2 0 11 ----- 13 715 15 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 15 730 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 12 745 11 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 11 800 10 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 10 815 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 7* 830 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 4* 845 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1* ----- 1600 ------------------------------ 17 0 0 0 ------------------------------ 0 1 0 16 ----- 17 1615 15 0 0 0 0 2 0 13 15 1630 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 13 1645 15 0 0 0 0 1 0 14 15 1700 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 14 1715 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11* 1730 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9* 1745 ----- ----- 1 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 0 0 0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 0 0 0 1 1* ----- ----- Mt. Prospect, IL Approach Totals Weather: Sunny and Warm Exit Totals 07/14/14 Northwest Hwy and Pine St E S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- 11:58:34 Thursday July 10, 2014 ------------------------------ 0 Pedestrians Only 15 0 ----- 17 715 12 0 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: 12 by Movement 14 730 16 Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- # 2 northwest/pine/peds 4 0 16 0 20 745 -------------------------------------------------------------- Begin N -Approach 0 E -Approach S -Approach 3 W -Approach Int Time RT ------------------- TH LT -------------- RT TH LT RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ------------------- 700 0 15 -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 2 0 -------------- 0 0 0 ----- 17 715 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 14 730 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 20 745 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 14 800 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 10 815 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 9* 830 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2* 845 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* ------------------- 1600 0 8 -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 4 0 -------------- 0 0 0 ----- 12 1615 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 11 1630 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 1645 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 1700 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 1715 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9* 1730 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3* 1745 0 ------------------- ------------------- 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0* ----- ----- TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection # 2 northwest/pine/peds Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----------------------------------- N E S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- ----------------------------------- 700 15 0 2 ------------------------------ 0 2 0 15 0 ----- 17 715 12 0 2 0 2 0 12 0 14 730 16 0 4 0 4 0 16 0 20 745 11 0 3 0 3 0 11 0 14 800 8 0 2 0 2 0 8 0 10 815 7 0 2 0 2 0 7 0 9* 830 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2* 845 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1* ----------------------------------- 1600 8 0 4 ------------------------------ 0 4 0 8 0 ----- 12 1615 7 0 4 0 4 0 7 0 11 1630 10 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 11 1645 10 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 11 1700 9 0 1 0 1 0 9 0 10 1715 8 0 1 0 1 0 8 0 9* 1730 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3* 1745 ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 0* ----- ----- Mt. Prospect, IL Weather: Sunny and Warm Exit 07/14/14 Northwest Highway and Elmhurst Ave Time ----------------------------------- N E S W ------------------------------ N 12:06:15 Thursday July 10, 2014 Bikers Only ----------------------------------- 700 0 2 0 ------------------------------ 2 0 2 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: 715 by Movement 2 0 1 Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- # 6 northwest/elm/bikers 2 3 730 0 1 0 -------------------------------------------------------------- Begin N -Approach 0 E -Approach S -Approach 1 W -Approach Int Time RT TH ------------------- LT -------------- RT TH LT -------------- RT TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ------------------- 700 0 0 -------------- 0 -------------- 0 2 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 2 0 ----- 4 715 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 730 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* ------------------- 1600 0 0 -------------- 0 -------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 ----- 0 1615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1630 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1645 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1700 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1715 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2* 1730 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 1745 0 0 ------------------- ------------------- 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0* ----- ----- TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection # 6 northwest/elm/bikers Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----------------------------------- N E S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- ----------------------------------- 700 0 2 0 ------------------------------ 2 0 2 0 2 ----- 4 715 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 730 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 745 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* ----------------------------------- 1600 0 0 0 ------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 0 ----- 0 1615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1630 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1645 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1700 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1715 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2* 1730 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1* 1745 ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 0* ----- ----- Mt. Prospect, IL Approach Weather: Sunny and Warm Totals 07/14/14 Northwest Highway and Pine St E S W ------------------------------ N E S W 12:15:52 Thursday July 10, 2014 Bikers Only ------------------------------ 2 0 2 1 2 ----- 5 715 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: 0 by Movement 1 2 4 Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- # 7 northwest/pine/bikers 0 1 0 1 0 -------------------------------------------------------------- Begin N -Approach 2 E -Approach S -Approach 0 W -Approach Int Time RT TH ------------------- LT -------------- RT TH LT -------------- RT TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ------------------- 700 0 1 -------------- 0 0 2 -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 2 0 ----- 5 715 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 730 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* ------------------- 1600 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 ----- 0 1615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1630 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1645 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1700 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1715 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2* 1730 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 1745 0 0 ------------------- ------------------- 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0* ----- ----- TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection # 7 northwest/pine/bikers Begin Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----------------------------------- N E S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- ----------------------------------- 700 1 2 0 ------------------------------ 2 0 2 1 2 ----- 5 715 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 4 730 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 745 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* ----------------------------------- 1600 0 0 0 ------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 0 ----- 0 1615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1630 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1645 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1700 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1715 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2* 1730 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1* 1745 ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 0* ----- ----- Capacity Analyses Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period M Peak Period (7:15-8:15 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Northwest and Elmhurst Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2014 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Northwest Hi hwa North/South Street: Elmhurst Ave Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 19 579 369 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 20 609 0 0 388 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 2 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 2 0 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 20 7 C (m) (veh/h) 1177 607 v/c 0.02 0.01 95% queue length 0.05 0.03 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 11.0 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.0 Approach LOS -- -- B Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:13 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kDA3 7.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Period (5:00-6:00 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Northwest and Elmhurst Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2014 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Northwest Hi hwa North/South Street: Elmhurst Ave Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 8 645 698 9 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 8 678 0 0 734 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 7 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 7 0 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 8 13 C (m) (veh/h) 873 308 v/c 0.01 0.04 95% queue length 0.03 0.13 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 17.2 LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 17.2 Approach LOS -- -- C Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:14 PM file :///C :/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k2l O6.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period M Peak Period (7:15-8:15 M Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Northwest and Pine Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2014 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Northwest HighwayNorth/South Street: Pine Street Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 576 371 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 5 606 0 0 390 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 6 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 6 0 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LR v (veh/h) 5 0 9 C (m) (veh/h) 1175 410 v/c 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.07 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 14.0 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 14.0 Approach LOS -- -- B Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:15 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k93 C 5.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Period (5:00-6:00 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Northwest and Pine Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2014 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Northwest HighwayNorth/South Street: Pine Street Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 10 642 687 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 10 675 0 0 723 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 16 7 2 12 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 16 7 2 12 0 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LR v (veh/h) 10 25 16 C (m) (veh/h) 876 173 201 v/c 0.01 0.14 0.08 95% queue length 0.03 0.49 0.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 29.3 24.5 LOS A D C Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 29.3 24.5 Approach LOS -- -- D C Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:15 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kl 3BD.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period M Peak Period (7:15-8:15 M Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Bank Access and Elmhurst Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2014 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Bank Access Drive North/South Street: Elmhurst Ave Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 22 2 8 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 23 2 8 7 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 8 1 C (m) (veh/h) 1603 1058 v/c 0.00 0.00 95% queue length 0.02 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 8.4 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 8.4 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:16 PM file :///C :/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k9867.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Period (5:00-6:00 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Acces Drive and Elmhurst Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2014 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Bank Access Drive North/South Street: Elmhurst Ave Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 15 2 8 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 15 2 8 11 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 2 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 2 0 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 8 6 C (m) (veh/h) 1613 1033 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.02 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.2 8.5 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 8.5 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:17 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k32E1.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period M Peak Period (7:15-8:15 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Northwest and Elmhurst Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2020 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Northwest Hi hwa North/South Street: Elmhurst Ave Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 72 554 381 8 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 75 583 0 0 401 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 3 42 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 3 0 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 75 47 C (m) (veh/h) 1161 749 v/c 0.06 0.06 95% queue length 0.21 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 10.1 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.1 Approach LOS -- -- B Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:17 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kC 560.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Period (5:00-6:00 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Northwest and Elmhurst Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2020 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Northwest Hi hwa North/South Street: Elmhurst Ave Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 34 654 726 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 35 688 0 0 764 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 14 29 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 14 0 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 35 44 C (m) (veh/h) 847 353 v/c 0.04 0.12 95% queue length 0.13 0.42 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 16.6 LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.6 Approach LOS -- -- C Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:18 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k6DBF.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period M Peak Period (7:15-8:15 M Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Northwest and Pine Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2020 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Northwest HighwayNorth/South Street: Pine Street Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 8 600 355 42 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 8 631 0 0 373 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 58 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 61 0 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LR v (veh/h) 8 0 65 C (m) (veh/h) 1153 327 v/c 0.01 0.20 95% queue length 0.02 0.73 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 18.7 LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 18.7 Approach LOS -- -- C Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:19 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kDAC3.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Period (5:00-6:00 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Northwest and Pine Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2020 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Northwest HighwayNorth/South Street: Pine Street Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 16 668 698 43 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 16 703 0 0 734 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 17 7 2 35 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 17 7 2 36 0 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LR v (veh/h) 16 26 47 C (m) (veh/h) 847 157 181 v/c 0.02 0.17 0.26 95% queue length 0.06 0.58 0.99 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 32.4 31.7 LOS A D D Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 32.4 31.7 Approach LOS -- -- D D Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:19 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k4CC 7.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control (General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Intersection A, Inc. Jurisdiction /2014 Analvsis Year Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLO Date Performed 7/16 Analysis Time PeriodA.M. Peak Hour T Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Bank Access Drive North/South Street: Elmhurst Ave Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 23 57 10 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 24 60 10 7 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 38 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h ) 0 0 0 40 0 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 10 43 C (m) (veh/h) 1526 926 v/c 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.02 0.15 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 9.1 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.1 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:19 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kB 817.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Period (5:00-6:00 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Acces Drive and Elmhurst Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2020 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Bank Access Drive North/South Street: Elmhurst Ave Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 15 34 10 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 15 35 10 11 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 32 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 33 0 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 10 39 C (m) (veh/h) 1570 957 v/c 0.01 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.13 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 8.9 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 8.9 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:20 PM file :///C :/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k2367.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period M Peak Period (7:15-8:15 M Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Access Drive and Pine Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2020 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Site Access Drive North/South Street: Pine Street Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 40 10 9 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 42 10 0 0 9 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 1 53 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 1 0 55 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 42 56 C (m) (veh/h) 1623 1073 v/c 0.03 0.05 95% queue length 0.08 0.16 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 8.5 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 8.5 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:20 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k9OD8.tmp 7/31/2014 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BSM Agency/Co. KLOA, Inc. Date Performed 7/16/2014 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Period (5:00-6:00 PM Page 1 of 1 rro ect uescn uon Intersection Access Drive and Pine Jurisdiction IDOT Analvsis Year 2020 rro ect uescn uon East/West Street: Site Access Drive North/South Street: Pine Street Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 32 34 16 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 33 35 0 0 16 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 2 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 2 0 31 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 33 33 C (m) (veh/h) 1612 1053 v/c 0.02 0.03 95% queue length 0.06 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 8.5 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 8.5 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright© 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/31/2014 2:21 PM file :///C:/Users/j millan/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kFB 1 F.tmp 7/31/2014 AutoTurn Exhibit 41 L� 19.00 3.00 11.00 u e�i'hd nn 3 P feet 4 y Width : 7.00 Track :6.00 �«v Lock to Lock Time : 6.0 Steering Angle : 31.6 \ a KLOi 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 MOUNT PROSPECT FIGURE N0. P:(847) 51 9990 6F01�847) 5,8-s9s7 SPECIALTY RETAIL CENTER PASSENGER VEHICLE MOVEMENT Kenis,Lh,dg n,0�H��a,ab000�,ino. PROJECT # 14-162 MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS X z o0 w V I 1 J V N I l w :3/\v 1SZknHWI3 1 S 3 N I d S g LL z p LU d_ :3/\v 1SZknHWI3 1 S 3 N I d S g D/\v iGNnHW73 1S 3NIc4 S g p6 LL - cj LO w V5 6 0z 00 n V I 1 J V N I l r) D/\v iGNnHW73 1S 3NIc4 S g p6 LL - LO w D/\v iGNnHW73 1S 3NIc4 S g N oo z U Q 00 0 _ om A -, z Q =21 0 o I R I zn LL 0 zn � I I o I zn zn ', 0 0 - CL LL - LU _J -------J o ivary=iii I I i7ILQLE ...... .... ... ...... .:. .. ... ... �. ::.....................:.........:::K::::3.................................... may -ON eOf bl'SI'8 b3[]N321 d9 LSL£ '. J 15 I'dO dMHJIH 3MH N M OOZ IE ul IME z IMELU O } LU �O z LU O O 0 IN Width 7.00 Track 6.00 Lock to Lock Time 6.0 Steering Angle 31.6 r 0 EDGE OF PAVEMENT NOIJ.3nuLSNO3 HOJ LON W N E vyN UI � I � � ..... ...' �'aaI—D" a�,a �al,aob�s� 431Tddb' N 13 3 N I N 3 AVNIW133dd ......... ..w MH MN IIIM ooz N31N30 lldl3a 43SOd0ad w = U M3N3tl AlIJ 6� I t Q W J C7 � e ~O d 12 u _ R J G �so�m XO c2 W N E vyN UI � I � � ary i / 9- c ^k , 246 / 7 �✓�S� CtN NOIJ.3nvLSNO3 HOd LON ���w=ossaw ���� ll '103d50?Jd '1W MH MN 1SIM OOd siueilnsuo� 6uuaa b-a,�,a,�ai,�apams` o d31N3� lldl3a 43SOdoad w J 41— 431ddb' OINEVIOAHd 11C. 8406-Z89gpSl-b89£9L 4d EIESS'NW'geyng O lOZ#al!n5 '44oN SZ �+H fill W F a � o o � O 6uijy6i-1 alis -up e a � �A8NO3iltld3ild ____________________�_ _____=N =Lr Vr. yr v, ' rr � o v �rr ,N G el „G ° of e\ r—L—vv 111 i WF meld€! a �l H9 IrHIjIIL g "FH i, age a� = sg s E"s; x;11, aid € 2 � r 3 i WF meld€! a �l IrHIjIIL g "FH i, = sg s E"s; x;11, aid € 2 � r 3 gy f . 20 asE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A DRIVE-THROUGH FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 200 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS “Petitioner” WHEREAS, LRA Equities, LLC (), has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit to operate a drive- “Property”) through for property located at 200 West Northwest Highway (and legally described as: PARCEL 1: LOT 1 (EXCEPT THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 246.07 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 67.34 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE THAT IS DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 65.76 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 55.38 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH ALONG, SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: EASEMENT FOR WATER MAIN; THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SAID POINT BEING 246.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 67.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PROPERTY INTENDED TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE THAT IS DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 10.0 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 84.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SAID POINT BEING 84.45 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 11.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 78.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING , IN COOK COUNTY, IL. PARCEL 3: EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS: THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SAID POINT BEING 22.0 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 72.93 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 77.49 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 21.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 50.50 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 60.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SAID POINT BEING 45.0 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 23.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN COOK COUNTY, IL. Property Index Number 08-12-100-013-0000; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use Permit and designated as PZ-24-14, th before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28 day of August, 2014 and th continued to the 25 day of September, 2014, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been published in the th Daily Herald Newspaper on the 10 day of September, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the Mayor and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-24-14; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit to operate a drive-through as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached and made a part of as Exhibit “A”. SECTION THREE: Approval of the Conditional Use permit is subject to complying with the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with site plan prepared by Tinaglia Architects dated September 18, 2014, but revised to: a. Providing a stop sign where the drive-through lane intersects the existing drive at the cross access easement. b. Providing a left turn only sign where the drive-through lane intersects the existing drive at the cross access easement. c. Aligning the north curb line of the drive-through lane with the north end of the existing cross access easement 2. Development of the building in conformance with the elevations prepared by Tinaglia Architects dated October 1, 2014. 3. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by InSite Landscape Design dated October 1, 2014, but revised as needed to comply with Code. 4. Submittal of a photometric (lighting) plan and fixture cut sheets that comply with Village Code requirements. 5. Providing an agreement with the Village for use of its property for an outdoor dining area. 6. Replacement of the existing nonconforming freestanding signs with new freestanding signs that comply with the Village Sign Code, including a minimum five (5) foot setback from property lines and placement outside of sight triangles. 7. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building and other Village Codes and regulations including signage. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PASSED and APPROVED this day of October, 2014. ______________________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\\CLKO\\WIN\\ORDINANCE2\\2014\\Con Use drivethroughPZ24-14-200WNorthwestHwyOct72104.doc mi" co uj 2 N I r4 S of a_ 0 IU_j � F, - CL IL mi" co uj 2 N I r4 S of a_ 0 IU_j � F, - CL Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: DEPUTY DIRECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 SUBJECT: SURPLUS PUBLIC WORKS PROPERTY TO BE SOLD The village has accumulated a large amount of scrap metal that needs to be recycled. Scrap metal is generated from maintenance and capital improvement projects. Attached is a detailed list of the items to be declared surplus and an ordinance that authorizes the village to sell the surplus items through the methods defined in the attached Exhibit A. Scrap metal is taken to a recycler that pays the Village per pound of material delivered. The rates offered depend on the type of metal and may vary daily. Based on current pricing, Cozzi O'Brien offers the best pricing for scrap steel and aluminum. All other materials, including brass and copper will be taken to Lake County Scrap, which is currently offering the best individual unit pricing for these materials. However, if pricing should change the material would be taken to the recycler offering the highest individual unit pricing. Please refer to Exhibit A for a detailed list of the quantities to be recycled and current pricing. Attached is an ordinance declaring miscellaneous personal property (Exhibit A) as surplus. With your concurrence, I would like to present this ordinance to the Mayor and Board of Trustees for their consideration at the October 7, 2014 Village Board Meeting. / Jason H. Leib Director of Public Works Attachments cc: Sean P. Dorsey, Director of Public Works Matt Overeem, Water & Sewer Superintendent ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS , pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-76-4), the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect may dispose of personal property owned by the Village when, in the opinion of a simple majority of the Corporate Authorities, such property is no longer necessary or useful to, or for the best interests, of the Village; and WHEREAS , Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect deem it no longer necessary, useful or in the best interests of the Village to retain the personal property described in Exhibit “A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWER: SECTION ONE: The personal property, described in Exhibit “A,” is declared to be surplus personal property because it is no longer necessary, useful or in the best interests of the Village to retain. SECTION TWO : The Village Manager, or his designee, is authorized to dispose of the Surplus Property in the manner described in Exhibit “A.” SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of October, 2014. _______________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk