The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVB Agenda Packet 04/04/2000Next Ordinance No. 5098 Next Resolution No. 18-00 ORDER OF BUSINESS REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday 50 South Emerson Street April 4, 2000 Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER II, ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks II1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Skowron IV. INVOCATION: Mayor Farley V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 22, 2000 VI. APPROVE BILLS VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. PROCLAMATION: EARTH DAY, April 22, 2000 B. PROCLAMATION: ARBOR DAY, April 28. 2000 C. PROCLAMATION: ALCOHOL AWARENESS MONTH, April, 2000 D. PROCLAMATION: AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY'S RELAY FOR LIFE, May 6-7, 2000 ANY INDIVIDUA£'WITH A.DISABILITY I/VHO WOULD.LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFRCE AT '100 SOUTH EMERSON STREETi 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064. E. RECOGNITION: Lieutenant Clarence F. Lehmann, 31 years with the Mount Prospect VOlunteer Fire Department F. Appointments VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IX. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 02-00, 120 N. Yates Lane 1s~ reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 120 N. YATES LANE (Exhibit A) This ordinance grants a variation to reconstruct an existing wood deck that encroaches three feet (3') into a required 7.5 foot side yard setback; the existing deck was built without a building permit. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. B. PC 01-00, 301 S. I-Oka Avenue, St. Raymond's Parish 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING EXCEPTIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 301 S. I-OKA AVENUE (Exhibit B) This ordinance grants exceptions from the Development Code for storm water detention and street light installation. C. ZBA 37-99, Phase 1B Downtown Redevelopment, Norwood Builders 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS PHASE 1B OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT, AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND MAIN STREET Exhibit C) This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for a Planned Unit Development at the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street, for 19,380 square feet of retail space and 34 condominium units with underground and surface parking. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. D. ZBA 05-00, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect 2~d reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE CODE Exhibit D) This ordinance amends Chapter 14, C-R Conservation Recreation Zoning District, of the Village Code, relative to uses and facilities in parks. The Zoning Board has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. E. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE V ENTITLED "METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE VILLAGE CODE Exhibit E) This ordinance authorizes an increase in water and sewer rates. X. NEW BUSINESS 'A. ZBA 06-00,204 S. I-Oka Avenue 1.. The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use permit to construct an · ' unenclosed front porch that.encroaches five feet into a required front .... · ' yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval · by a vote of 5-0. 2. The petitioner is appealing the den al, by the Zoning Board of Appeals, of a request for a variation to iri~r~ase the permitted lot coverage from 50% to 55%. The Zoning Board of Appeals has final authority on this matter, but Village Code allows for an appeal to the Village Board. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3-2 to deny the request. B. ZBA 07-00, 1 E. Rand Road, CVS Pharmacy The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use permit and variations for the construction of a 23,880 sq. ft. multi-tenant retail building, including a drug store with drive-through service. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. C. ZBA 04-2000, 605 Kensington Road, Jules Hot Dogs The petitioner is requesting a conditional use permit to construct a 2,914 square foot fast food restaurant with drive through. The ZBA recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. D, Safety Commission recommendations: 1. Request for approval of No Parking Any Time on the east side of N. Louis Street from a point 425' to a point 433' north of the centerline of E. Thayer Street; the Safety Commission recommended approval by a vote Of 5-0. 2. Request for approval of No Parking Any Time along the north side of Prospect Avenue between Kenilworth Avenue and Lancaster Street; the Safety Commission recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. Xl. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT A. Bid results: 1. 2000 Concrete Restoration Program at various locations throughout the Village B. Accept proposal for design of Route 83 Streetlight Improvement Project C. ' Accept proposal for 2000 Material Testing Program for street resurfacing and reconstruction D. Status Report Xll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Xlll. CLOSED SESSION PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (2) - "Collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary .schedules for one or more classes or employees", XIV. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT MARCH 22, 2000 CALL CALL TO ORDER TO ORDER Village Clerk Velma Lowe called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. ROLL CALL ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Dennis Pdkkel Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Irvana Wilks Absent: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Timothy Comoran Trustee Paul Hoefert (arrived late) MAYOR PRO TEM In the absence of Mayor Farley, Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Prikkel nominated Trustee Irvana Wilks as Mayor Pro Tem. Upon roll calk Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PLEDGE Trustee Prikkel led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION INVOCATION MINUTES Mayor Pro Tem Wilks gave the invocation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowran, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held March 7, 2000. Upon roll call: Ayes: Prikkel, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. BILLS APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Lohrstor~er, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ 505,806 Refuse Disposal Fund 113,807 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 19,787 Community Development Block Grant Fund 201 Debt Service Funds Capital Improvement Fund 1,040 Capital Improvement Construction Fund Downtown Redevelopment Const. Fund 50,014 Street Improvement Construction Fund Flood Control Construction Fund 400 Water & Sewer Fund 238,188 Parking System Revenue Fund 944 Vehicle Maintenance Fun¢ 15,456 Vehicle ReplaCement Fund Compute~.Replace~nent Fund 17,752 Risk Management Fund 278;305 Flexdomp.Trust Fund 2Z,092 Escrow Deposit Fund 48,554 Benefit Trust Funds $1,317,346 (Trustee Hoefert arrived during the reading of the bills). Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried, FINANCIAL RBPORT FINANCIAL Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of the REPORT financial report for January t, 2000-February 29, 2000, subject to audit. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefer~, Prikkel, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None · MAYOR'S Motion carried. REPORT: MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Pro Tern Wilks presented a proclamation acknowledging Senior Celebration Day, SENIOR May 10. CELEBRATION DAY Mayor Pro Tern Wilks presented a proclamation acknowledging International Building Safety Week, April 2-8, after which William Cooney, Director of Community Development, INTL. BUILDING spoke on its significance. SAFETY WEEK There were no appointments made to boards or commissions· APPTS. An ordinance was presented for first reading, which amends Chapter 5 of the Village Code by creating a Sister Cities Commission. AMEND CH. 5: SISTER CITIES Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two COMMISSION readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None . Motion carried· ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance NO. 5095 No. 5095: AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SISTER CITIES COMMISSION Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. CITIZENS CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Richard Hendricks, 1537'E. Emmerson Lane, addressed the Board with a number of concerns, none of which required action by staff or Village Board. LIONS CEUB Michael Ruzicka, representing the Mount Prospect Lions Club, asked the Board to waive FAIR FEES · the ou,t.of~pocket exPenses associated with the annual Village fair scheduled for June 29- July 4, 2000. · · ':' Trustee Hoefer~,' s(~C°nded by T~ustee Skowr0n, moved to waive the out-of-pocket . " · eXpehses associated, with.the annual.Village fair, ;'.: ' " -' ' *' ' ' '. 'UlJon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert; Lohmtorfer, Prlkkel;~Sl~n~ Wilks " ' ' ' .... Page 2 - March 22. 2000 Motion carried. Mr. Ruzicka also informed the audience that the Lions Club will begin hosting the Farmers Market on Sundays, beginning June 11, at 8:00 a.m. ZBA 26-99 OLD BUSINESS TACO BELL ZBA 26-99, 820 E. Rand Road, Taco BelI/KFC An ordinance was presented for second reading which would grant a Conditional Use KFC and variations to allow the construction of a fast food restaurant with a drive-through 820 E. RAND facility. ROAD Mr. Cooney noted one condition listed in the ordinance, which was revised to read as follows: "7. Submittal of documentation conslusively demonstrating the existence of cress-access agreements between the subject property and adjacent properties (Thunderbird Lanes and Menards) prior to issuance of a building permit." Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to amend the ordinance presented for ZBA 26-99, as stated by Mr. Cooney. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance ORD. No. 5096, as amended: NO. 5096 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 820 EAST RAND ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstoffer, Prikkel, Skowren, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 35-99, 1712 Martha Lane ZBA 35-99 An ordinance was presented for first reading, for approval of a variation to allow the 1712 MARTHA construction of a 720 square foot, three-car detached garage. The Zoning Board of LANE Appeals and the Village Board both previously denied the request, after which revised . plans were submitted and approved by the Village Board on March 7 ' Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefer[, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer. moved for approval of Ordinance NO. 5097 No. 5097: AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1712 MARTHA LANE Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pdkkel, Skowron, Will~s NAYS: None Motion carded. ZBA 02-00 ZBA 02-00, 120 N. Yates Lane . ~120 I~I.'YATES The petitione~: presented a request for 8 side yard setback variation, allowing.for the ~' - -~ ' rec~stru~.ion of all exlstin, g w ',o~1 deck that?Il enCroad,~, .t[lree-feet (3') into.the:requ!re~l., Page 3 -March 22. 2000 7.5 foot side yard setback; the existing deck was built by a previous owner, without obtaining a building permit. The Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. Petitioner, Lawrence Metzger, addressed the Board's questions relative to this project. Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane, expressed his opposition to the proposed variation, and protested Mayor Pro Tern Wilks' request for a three-minute time limit for comments, at which time Trustee Prikkel called for a point of order. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by.Trustee Prikkel, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board to grant the variation requested in ZBA 02-00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pdkkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None' Motion carried. An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the April 4 meeting. ZBA 05-00 ZBA 05-00, Text Amendment, Village of MQunt Prospect TEXT An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would amend Chapter 14 (Zoning) of AMENDMENTS the Village Code, relative to uses and facilities in parks, Section VII, C-R Conservation Recreation Zoning District. Trustee Prikkel stated his opposition to the amendments addressing yard requirements (Sec. 14.704.B.1) as it would affect backstops at baseball diamonds, and demonstrated, using a softball and mitt, how he felt a passerby might be injured; resident Mr. John Korn assisted him. Lou Ennessor, representing the Mount Prospect Park District, and Mark Pope, from the River Trails Park District, were present and addressed concerns from Board members. Chades Miller, former member of the Mount Prospect Park District, spoke on behalf of the petitioner and park districts, stating that he has never known of any injuries caused by balls being hit at the various parks, and that he supports the proposed text amendments. This ordinance will be presented for second reading at the April 4 Village Board meeting.' ZBA 37-99 ZBA 37-99, Phase lB Downtown Redevelopment, Norwood Builders PHASE i B, An ordinance was presented for first reading to grant a Conditional Use permit for a NORWOOD Planned Unit Development at the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street, for a structure consisting of 34 condominium units with underground and surface parking, and 19,380 square feet of retail space. This ordinance will be presented for second reading at the April 4 Village Board meeting. PC 01-00, 301 S. I-Oka Avenue, St. Raymond's Parish PC 01-00 A request was presented for exceptions to the Development Code for storm water 301 S. I-OKA detention, and for street light installation. AVENUE The petitioner is constructing an addition to its facility, and wishes to provide storm water ST. RAYMOND detention to the addition 'only, rather than the entire structure. Also, the petitioner asked the Board for relief from the requirement for {he installation of streetlights. Staff recommended the inclusion of a covenant as'part Of the ordinance, whibh"would make the.petltioner,.responsible for.stre.e~ light installation in the future, if the'need Should ' ' Ben Trapani, 222 S. Pine Street, and Jim Tinaglia, both representing the petitioner, addressed a number of concerns from the Board, and indicated that a street light covenant was acceptable. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Plan Commission to grant the exceptions to the Development Code in PC 01-00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. An ordinance will be presented for first reading on April 4, 2000. Wiilliam Cooney presented resolutions and agreements for Community Development CDGB Block Grant funding, stating th~ the Department of Housing & Urban Development had FUNDING: granted the Village $356,000. The following nine resolutions were presented for funding allocations for the fiscal year 2000: RES. Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 8-00 No, 8-00: RESOURCE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN CENTER FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY COMMUNITY LIVING LIVING Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. RES. Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 9-00 No. 9-00: HOPE NOW, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN INC. THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND HOPE NOW, INC. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried · RES. Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 10-00 No. 10-00: SUBURBAN A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETVVEEN PRIMARY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECq' AND THE SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH HEALTH CARE CARE COUNCIL, INC. FOR THE ACCESS TO CARE PROGRAM COUNCIL Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. RES. Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of Resolution NO'. 12-00 No. 12-00: ' RESOURCE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETVVEEN CTR. FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND. THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE ELDERLY FOR SENIOR SHARED HOUSING ELDERLY Upon r°ll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer,-Pr[kkel, Skowron, Wiiks · Nays:.'. None ": · ' ' " ' ' - ...... · .' Mo e . · ' -- : - ,. , -- .: . . Page 5 - March.22, 2000 RES. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 12-00 No. 12-00: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN CAMP FIRE THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CAMP FIRE BOYS AND GIRLS BOYS & GIRLS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO COUNCIL FOR THE NEW HORIZONS PROGRAM AND CAMP KOOL SUMMER PROGRAM Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion RES. Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 13-00 No. 13-00: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOY SCOUTS THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-- OF AMERICA NORTHWEST SUBURBAN COUNCIL, INC, FOR THE LEARNING FOR LIFE PROGRAM Upon roll calk Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried· RES. Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of Resolution NO. '~4-00 No. 14-00: CLAYGROUND A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN INC. THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CLAYGROUND, INC. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. RES. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 15-00 No. 15-00: CLUB A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN REC PLEX THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CLUB REC PLEX Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks. Nays: None Motion carried. RES. NO. '[6-00 Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer. moved for a0proval of Resolution No. 16-00: CEDA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN NORTHWEST THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE CEDA NORTHWEST SELF-HELP SELF-HELP CENTER CENTER Upon roll calk Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron,'Wilks Nays: None Motion .carried. OPERATION A resolution was presented which would authorize the Village's appliCation for Operation Green Light funds, in the amount of $~00,000. fi;om the Illinois Department of GREEN L GHT · Transportation. These funds will be' used.to pa~/for a portion of site improvements at the FUNDS tralh station. ~ ' RES. Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 17-00 No. 17-00: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR OPERATION GREEN LIGHT FUNDS FROM THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. AMEND An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would amend Chapter 22 of the CH. 22'. Village Code, by increasing water and sewer rates; the increases are slightly less than INCREASE 4%. WATER, SEWER This ordinance will be presented for second reading at the April 4 meeting. RATES VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Village Manager Michael Janonis presented the following bid results for the year 2000 CATCH BASIN catch basin and inlet, cleaning program: & INLET CLEANING BIDDER AMOUNT Elgin Sweeping Services, Inc. $21,250.00 Midwest Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. 21,500.00 A-K Underground, Inc. 22,237.50 Heritage Environmental Services, LLC 25,000.00 National Power Rodding Corporation 40,250.00 Kenny Industrial Services, LLC 59,000.00 ELGIN Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to concur with the SWEEPING recommendat on of staff to accept the bid submitted by Elgin Sweeping Services in an SERVICES amount not to exceed the budgeted amount of $35,200.00. Upon roll cell: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. CATCH BASIN & INLET The following bid results were presented for catch basin and inlet repair REPAIR BIDDER AMOUNT Archon Construction Co.. Inc. $29,825.00 Glenbrook Excavating, [nc. 42,300.00 ARCHON Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur with the CONSTR. CO. recommendation of staff to accept the bid submitted by Archon Construction Co. in an amount not to exceed the budgeted amount of $30,000.00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. SOLID WASTE A request was presented for approval of another contract with ARC Disposal for CONTRACT residential solid waste'services effective May 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004 (Contract filed with official minutes). ARC DISPOSAL ' Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to concur with the · . recommendation of:staff, for a solid.wasfe contract with ARC Disposal, for the term ...... May 1,200Othrough December 31,2004. · " ' Page'7 - March 22, 2000 . Upon roll coil: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion corried. VEHICLE The Board received a request for approval for acceptance of a State of Illinois bid for the PURCHASE purchase of one new car for the Engineering Division. LANDMARK Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to award a contract to FORD Landmark Ford, of Springfield, Illinois for a 2000 Ford Taurus, at a cost not to exceed $15,549.00. Upon roll coil: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None' Motion corried. CENTRAL A request was presented for authorization of an amended IDOT agreement increasing ROAD, I DOT their funding limit from $736,400 to $899,800, as part of the Central Road Improvement AGRMT. Project, which entailed the installation of traffic signals and turn lanes at the 3-Com facility site and Melas Park. Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Prikkel moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the IDOT amended agreement, increasing their funding limit from $736,400 to $899,800· Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried CENTRAL ROAD FINAL Additionally, as part of the Central Road Improvement Project, Final Change Orders were CHANGE presented for approval for R.W. Dunteman Co., increasing the construction cost from ORDERS: $986,530.03 to $1,080,729.82, end for SDI Construction Group increasing the SDI & engineering contract from $69,057.00 to $97,057.00. R.W. Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve the Final Change DUNTEMAN Order for R.W. Dunteman Co. increasing the Central Road project from $986,530.03 to $1,080,729.82. Upon roll coil: Ayes: Hoefertl Lohrstorfer, Prikkel~ Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion corried Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the Final Change Order roi' SDI Construction Group increasing the Central Road improvements engineering contract from $69,057.00 to $97,057.00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried GENERAL OBLIGATION A request was presented for Board approval for the issuance of tax-exempt general BONDS obligation bonds to fund various flood control projects. The bonds would be dated June 1, 2000, and totally retired on December 1, 2008. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the issuance of $2,165.000 of tax-exempt general 'obligation bonds ~pr purposes of funding various flood control improvement projects. upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Loh~torfer, Prlkkel, ~kowron, Wilks Nays: None · Paae 8 - M~r~.h ~ CORRIDOR Mr. Cooney presented the Board with a proposal for additions to the Corridor Design DESIGN Guidelines contract with Wolff Clements and Associates, Ltd. of Chicago, which was CONTRACT approved in 1999. He reported that two additional urban design opportunities have ADDITION arisen--those being the southeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street, and the northwest corner of Northwest Highway and Emerson Street, and that Wolff Clements and Associates would do the design work for an amount of $2,400.00. WOLFF CLEMENTS & Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to accept the proposal from, and approve an increase in the current contract with WCA by $2,400.00, for additions to ASSOCIATES the previously approved Corrider Design Guidelines contract. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. OTHER : BUSINESS ANY OTHER BUSINESS Village Manager Michael Janonis stated that Prospect Heights staff and representatives of the arena to be developed there, will be at the March 28 Committee of the Whole meeting, to address issues that might impact Mount Prospect. CLOSED CLOSED SESSION SESSION Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to convene a Closed Session to discuss the following: LITIGATION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (11) - "Litigation, when an action against, affecting or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable 6r imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting." Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstoffer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. RECONVENE RECONVENE The Board reconvened at 10:54 p.m. ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes: H0efert, Lohrstor~er, Prikkel, SkoWron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Page 9 ~ March 22, 2000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION 30-Mar-00 Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt Balance 03/17100 Per Attached Credits/ Balance 031.17/00 03/30/00 List of Bills Debits 03/30/00 General Fund 8,458,209 ' 1,755,049 385,433 9,827,825 Special Revenue Funds Refuse Disposal Fund 1,535,441 286,019 110,602 1,710,858 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 893,702 2,108 122,200 773,610 Community Development BIk Grant Fund 48,371 1,900 46,471 Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 11,609 11,609 Debt Service Funds 3,544,141 128,809 3,672,950 Capital Pro_iects Funds Capital Improvement Fund 2,160,003 64,208 2,095,795 Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 53,178 53,178 Capital Improvement Construction Fund 179,056 1,648 177,408 Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 502,506 8,729 144,267 366,968 Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,137,647 62,021 48,850 4,150,818 1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,633 4,633 Flood Control Construction Fund 992,583 200,000 1,860 1,190,723 Enterorise Funds Water & Sewer Fund 2,922,345 335,189 18,226 3,239,308 Parking System Revenue Fund 697,685 7,048 11 704,722 Internal Service Funds Vehicle Maintenance Fund 150,915 102 19,176 131,841 Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,028,833 5,028,833 Computer Replacement Fund 227,758 1,079 226,679 Risk Management Fund 3,050,259 55,850 43,002 3,063,107 Trust & Aaencv Funds Police Pension Fund 30,774,369 32.246 23.794 30,782,821 Fire Pension Fund 31,907,623 28,103 20,906 31,914,820 Flexcomp Trust Fund 2.368 9 150 11,518 Escrow Deposit Fund 1,427,955 53,079 19,829 1,461,205 Benefit Trust Funds 105,136 544 104,592 98,8'16,325 2,963,502 .1,027,535 t00,752,292 REPORT: REEOARDRPT GENEHATED: 5 NOV 99 15:50 RUK: TSUREDAY MAR3000 14:02 PAGE 1 P~LEASE ID : ¥II~AGE OF MOIIN~ PROSPECT LIST OF BILI4 PSI~RETED TO THE BO~ OF TRUSTEES ~ ~ 17 2000, TO ~CH 30 2000 DB~ ~R NBR ~N~R N~ I~OIOR RESC~I~ N~-DEP~ 03107 ~I B~INGS, INC ~RPA~ 18.00 04800 ~HITECT~ CONSULT~S ~D 36.00 04778 B~K~S~, B~TA ~D 36.00 01102 CITIES, N.A. ~ INS C~S-~ 1152.30 ~ INS. C~I~-~ 23689.48 24841.78 01118 CLE~ OF THE CIRCUIT C~T PAYROLL ~R - 032300 700.00 PAYROLL ~R- 032300 190.00 890.00 04801 C~RO, GEORGE ~RP~/STIC~R 18.00 04779 D~5, ~Y ~D 24.00 04780 D~IN, SID~Y S~IOR ~TE 24.00 04781 FILIPIC, GE~ ~ ESTATE T~ ~BATE 540.00 00102 ~ P~SION ~D PAYRO~ DR - 032300 12182.I8 00121 FI~T NATtON~ B~K OF CHICAGO SAVINGS B~DS 3/23/00 450.00 04782 GAYED, ADEL ~ND 3.23 ~D 0.34 3.57 04783 ~ERT, AU~LIA ~D 24.00 04773 GILL~, ~UG o~a~ 36.00 04774 ~EY, R~ ~SOLD C~ 36.00 01648 IBB~S~ H~TING CO. TRUCK SOLaCeD 78.00 00106 I~ ~I~ ~UST - 401 PAYRO~ ~R - 032300 316.93 00107 t~ ~I~ TRUST - 457 PAYROLL ~R - 032300 t4815.15 00108 ILLINOIS 6EP~ OF ~E PA~ D~ - 031100 20..58 PAYRO~ ~R - 03~100 1905.27 PAYRO~ ~R- 032300 15739.87 -' PA~ ~ - ~32800. 15.63 ~D~I~ SI~ IN~ 102.58 VOID ~ 00109 ~INOIS ~ICt~ ~I~ ~AY~ ~ TM 032300 237.00 REPORT: APDOARDRPT GENE~TED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THUNSDAY MAR3000 I4:52 PAGE 2 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF HILLS PRESEiqTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUN MARCH 17 2000 TO MARCH 30 2000 DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AROUNT ................................................................................................................................... 01044 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 032300 300.00 PAYROLL FOR - 032300 14.63 PAYROLL FOR - 032300 519.23 PAYROLL FOR - 032300 195.50 PAYROLL FOR- 032300 192.29 PAYROLL FOR - 032300 126.00 PAYROIL FOR - 032300 60.00 t407.65 04784 KAOFI4AN, LILLIAN REFUND 52.38 REFUND 8.46 57.84 04775 KI NVANG CROI PAID TEAiqSFUE 20.00 04776 MC CAI~t+{T, FUAIqCIS REFUND 24.00 00116 METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PAYROLL FOR - 032300 250.00 00117 METROROLITAiq A~LIANCE - ROLICE PAYROLL FOR - 032300 546.00 04785 MIN, DUREI REFUND 24.00 04786 MISUNENKO, NICHOLS OVERPAYMENT 24.00 04787 NIWA, TERESA REFUND 36.00 02228 OARTUN PAVILLIUN EE,~LTHCARE E~ DELIVE~D ~S BILLED t550.00 HC{4E DELIVERED MEALS 1437.50 2987.50 04788 PARIRE, ?AEKAJ REFUND 36.00 04789' PATEn, R. REFUND 36.00 04790 PAWLYSNTN, ROBERT REFUND 9.69 REFOI{D 1.02 10.71 00123 RERSCO PAYROLL FOR - 032300 17119.21 00124 POLICE PENSION FOND PAYROnn FOR - 032300 14819.94 PAYROLL FOR - 032800 5L52 14871.46 · 02334 ' ~OS%~{ASTER POSTAGE ST~PS 330.00 01301 RED A UNIMESE. RESTABMANV, INC. REFUND niQuo{{ liCENSE ~ 1167~00 02962 P, UNWOOD ANT. PAi~'NEAS REFUN/D 29.07 REFUND 3.06 REFORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 t5:50 EON: TEUESDAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGE 3 REREASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOQNT PRDSRECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RE~ MARCE 17 2000 TO MARCH 30 2000 DEF~ VUNDOR NBR ~T/~OOR NAME tNYOICE DESCRIPTION k~OU~ 32.13 04673 SAN BERNARDINO COUNIY CEI~ SUPPORT PAYMENTS PAYROLL FOR - 032300 211.85 04576 SAREELLI CONSTRUCTION REFUND 40.00 REFUND FEES 900937 40.00- 0.00 04791 SCHATZ, JOE OVEa~AYMEF1 10.00 04805 SCHtSMANN, WILLIAM REFUND-CAR SOLD 36.00 00125 REtU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOE - 032300 813.50 04559 TANGNEY & SONS RES?ORATIUN BOND 500.00 RESTOk~TIUN BOND 25.00 RESTORAYION BOND 50.00 575.00 04472 T~XUN PETROLEUN CO FUEL PIRCHARE 9723.68 02689 THIRD DISTRICTCIRCUI?COUNT BUND MONEY 2615.00 BOND MONEY 1070.00 BOND MONEY 1850.00 5540.00 02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE BY PHONE 3000.00 00127 UNITED WAY PAYROLL FOR - 032300 432.88 04792 Uk~RECHIN, ALEESANDRE REFUND 12.92 REFUND 1.36 14.28 00128 VItLARE OF MOU1FI PROSPECT PAYEOLLFOR- 031100 36.75 POLICE PRESIONMARCH 2000 7639.12 PAYROLL FOR - 032300 17526.25 FIRE PENSION MARCH 2000 7448.25 RETIREE tESTALIlq2~CS MARCH2000 344.28 RETIREE INSTA~I24RETS MARCH2000 7247.91 DISBUNSEI4ENTS 5855.00 DISBUNREI4ENTS 100.00 46197.56 04314 VILAAGEOFMOUNTBROBPECT - PAYROLAWIRRE PAYRO~ FOR- 031100 107.01 PAYROLL FOR- 031100 50.71 RAYROL~'~DR- 031100 34.06 . pAYROI~O~- 032100 16005.11 · ' ~AYROI,~ EOR- 03210Q 2005.23 BAYRO!2, '~OR- 032100 1749,70 [~)LICBPEI{SIONMARCH2000 16154,48 REPORT: AREOREDRPT G~NERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY MAR3000 14:02 PAGE 4 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BIL~ PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~ON MARCH 17 2000 TO ~J~RCH 30 2000 DEPT VENDOR WHR VL~DOR N~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ................................................................................................................................... PAYROLL FOR- 032300 125491.68 PAYROLL FOR - 032300 18351.80 PAYROLL FOR - 032300 12325.33 FIRE PUNSIUN PAYROLL MARCH2000 13457.92 RETIREE PENSION MARUN 2000 58.96 RETIREE P~NSION MARCH 2000 200.00 PAYROLL FOR - 032800 79.46 ADDITIONAL SICK INCENTIVE 351.53 VOID UNIFO~ ~LOWANCE 118.85- 206994.22 04793 W~IDWHH, DIANE REPUND 18.00 04803 WESOLUNSKI, HOREA IRENE REFUND STICKER 36.00 04804 WHITE, COLLEEN REFUND 36.00 TOTAL : 384679.01 PUBLIC REPRESERTATION 02241 ONE STOP TELECC~4UNICATIUNS SERVICE-MRECH 24.76 02301 PETTY ONSE - FINANCE DE~T. MISC EXPENSES 79.92 TOTAL : 104.68 VILLAGE MANAUNR'S OFFICE 03901 3UNA CONFERENCE-M. JANDRIS 85.00 01820 AA S~IFT PRINT, INC. MAR/APR NEWSLETTER 7600.00 01049 CON GOVEP~UNT, tNC PORT HVE 535.38 04051 DINEX, IRC IN~ERNOT SERVICE 1376.66 01609 HOLY FREILY WHDICAL CENTER PRE-E~PLAY}~HNT PHYSICALS 186.00 01753 IPEI/~A REGISTER-DAVID STRAHL 50.00 00353 JANUNIS, 14ICEARL E. LUNCH ~RTIRG 68.13 LUNUN/~RTING 80.40 I48.53 01783 JOOREkL & TOPICS WHWSPAPEXS RENEWAL-VILLARE M~AGWH 25.00 01827 KLEIN, THOWHE AND J~KIWH,LTD, LEGhJ: SERVICES 12407.75 02~41 OWE STOP TELEC~ICATIONE RERVICR-I&U{CH 82.53 04766 PA ~ REGIETRE-R.RTI~AH~ 10.00 02281 'PO ~GARIWH ~ 22 ISSUE 39.97 02301 PRT'I~ CALK - FIN/~CE DER. MISC EXP~21EWS 20.84 I{ISC EXEEWSWH 7.18 REPOP, T: APBOASDRPT GENERATED: 5 EOV 99 15:58 RON: THO~SUAY lt~3000 14:52 PAGE 5 VIL~GE OF M~ PROSPE~ LIST OF BIL~ ~SE~ED TO THE ~ OF TRUSTEES ~ ~CH 17 2000 ~ ~CH 30 2000 DE~ ~N~R ~R ~R~R ~ I~OICE DESCRI~I~ ~ 28.02 023~8 ~UICK P~ PLUS~ INC. M~O PADS/~tC~ O~ER 43.20 ~ : 22623.04 ~ S~VICES D~ISIO~ 04772 B~IZ~ LIG~ SUPPORY SYST~ H40.75 01957 ~RTEK ~DEO SUPPLY M~ITOR/VIDEO G~BER 386.~5 S~IDINU SHELF 242.13 M~i~OR 5~.20 I172.78 02241 ONE STOP TELEC~I~TI~S SRAVICE-~CH 165.06 02301 P~TY C~H - FIN~CE DE~. RISC ~PENSES 149.29 047~ SUPE~ DR~ IN CATERIN~ ~R VOL~EER P~TY 331.~0 ~ 32~9.38 VIL~GE CLE~'S O~tCE 01518 ~SA~R OFFICE E~IP., INC. SUPPLIES 167.~9 01230 D~T~LL CO,OPTION N~SLE~TER S~SC~P~ION i96.00 02028 MIGHTY MITES A~S & S~S P~E 46.58 02241 ONE STO~ TE~C~I~Tt~S SERVICE-~H 82.53 02536 S~E~ SPEC~TIES INC. PENS 2t~.22 02632 STEWING CODIFIE~, INC. ENPPL~ ~2 1120.00 ~ 1828.32 FIN~CE DEP~ 01165 ~K C~P~E~ SERVICE ~K D~.1999 40.00 01518 ~S~R OFFICE EQBIP., INC. SUPPLIES 167.99 04543 CORPO~E ~P~SS SUPPLIES 3.30 SUPP~I~ 89257 92.87 01208 CR~ CHIZEK ' ~D&BU Y~ AUDI~ ' 9~8.50 01223 ~LY O~ P~S $USP~ 107.67 SUPPLIES ' ~4.91 ~-~D ~S. 226.44 O~.~ ?5,50 ~34.52 REPORT: AP~OARDRFr GENSRATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 ~,ON: TRE~DAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGN 6 P~L~SR ID : VILLAGE OF MOM PROSPECT LIST OF SILLS P~SE~?RD TO THE DOA~D OF TRUSTEES ~ MA~CE 17 2000 TO MARCH 30 2000 ................................................................................................................................... DER VENDOR NBR ~NDOR NAME INVOICE DESC~I~ION ................................................................................................................................... 01783 J~AL ~ TOPICS NEWSPAPE~ ~E~-FIN~CE 25.00 04138 MID,ST DATA CO~. ~I~CE 355.47 02148 NEOPOST ~STAGE M~E~ 558.00 02241 ~ STOP TELEC~I~TIONS SEUICE-~CH 313.61 02301 RElY C~H - TIN,CE DE~. MISC ~PENSES 26.25 MISC ~PENS~ 6.01 MISC ~P~SES 17.tl 49.37 02479 ~YOIN SIGN ~D DE~ ~ ESTATE T~S~R ST~PS 470.00 02639 STI~ T~DO~Y PE~O~EL DATA E~RY SEUICES 652.58 02672 SYST~S ~, INC. SUPPLIES 529.20 ~SEK CREC~ t85.77 714.97 T~ : 4832.88 C~ITY DE~LO~ 04769 APA-ILLINOIS P~NING C~.T~G. 60.00 00309 C~NEY, ~I~ J. APA CONF. ADVICE 830.00 .01222 DAILY HE~LD AD 302.5t 01783 J~ & TOPICS N~SPAP~ ~N~-CODE EN~RC. 25.00 01979 MCI WITLESS SEUICE 83.84 SEUICE 150.07 SEUICE 65.I3 299.04 04138 MIDST DATA CO~. E~IP ~I~. I67.50 02241 ORE STOP {E~C~I~TIONS SE~CE-~RCH 82.53 SEUICE-~RE~ 123.79 S~VtCE-~CH 2t4.57 SEUICE-~CH 66.02 SE~CE=~CH 66.02 552.93 02301 P~TY C~H - F~E DE~. MIDO ~P~S~ Z9.48 MISC ~P~S~ 21.67 ~ ~P~ 24.00 · ~ ~S~ 24.00 MISC =?~SES 21.83 RE~ORT: APBOAP~DRPT GENE~TEO: 5 NOV 99 15:50 RON: THURSDAY MA~3000 14:52 PAGE 7 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOON~ PROSPEC~ LIST OF BILLS P~SE~ED TO THE BO~ OF TRUSTEES ~ ~CH 17 2000 TO ~CM 30 2000 O~ ~R NBR ~R ~ I~OICE O~SC~I~ ~O~ 120.98 02379 QUILL CO~O~TI~ SUPPLIES 76.05 02380 QUIN~ ~UBLIS~ING C~P~Y ZONING NEWS 96.81 04797 SB~ BUSINESS ~ETING 240.00 02658 S~O~ P~SS PE~IT FO~S 133.00 SUPPLIES 290.00 423.00 04806 T~CO, INC. INSP~TOR II 324,00 02691 TH~PSON EL~ATO~ INSPE~IONS ~-INSPE~ION 31.00 02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODU~S MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES 94.55 02844 ~GU~ CL~HING 72.38 T~AL : 3715.75 C~ITY D~LOP~ - 01222 DAILY ~E~D LEG~ N~ICE 125.60 AD 64.23 189,83 04102 DAS, MISTY CONDUCE ~P~SES 381.90 01377 ~DE~ ~P~SS CO~P SERVICE 18,45 00335 DLEY, AP~L B. A~V~CE-~OR P~G 1050.00 ~O~ PR~ SUPPLIES I31.16 118t.16 01690 ILLINOIS H~SING DEV.A~HO~TY ~GIST~-MISTY DAS 45.00 02830 ~IST UP ~O~ P~ T-ShirTS 84.00 T~ : 1900.34 ~ SEUICES 02919 303 ~ ~S~IATION~ INC. S~IO~ T~I ~DES 336.70 04590 ~R, ~B~T P. ~INE D~CE IRSTKU~ION 280.00 01979 MCI ~L~S S~UICE 33.19 ~2214 ~I~ C~S~T~S ~ 28.00. 02241 ~ ~OP T~I~TI~S S~CE~H 297..10 . . 02388 ~I~ ~S~5, I~C. 50Dh O~ ~P ~I~ 280.50 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY MAR3000 t4:52 PAGE 8 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES NE~ MARCH 17 2000 TO I,[%RCH 30 2000 DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AROONT 02619 STAT TECRNOL~IES, INC. MEDICAL SUPPLIES 334.50 T~A5 : 1589.99 POLICE 04354 BATTERY ZONE VIS~ RADIO BATTERIES 115.00 01049 CDW GOVEENNENT, INC C~PUTER SUPP 197.35 COLOR PRINTER 2805.11 SUPPLIES 206.70 3209.16 04732 DBT ONLINE, INC. SERVICES ERNDERED 150.00 00106 IC~,t~ RETIP,5'~E~ TRUST - 401 IC)fi%-401 PAVLOCK 425.63 01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. PAPER 999.60 01714 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE ACADB%IY REGISTRATION 1313.96 REGISTRATION 1313.96 2627.92 01794 KALE UNIFORES, INC. CL~HING SUPPLIES 221.00 01979 MCI WIRELESS SERVICE 1/24-2/23/00 635.14 02182 NORTHERN ILLINOIS POLICE ~ SYSTRN SERVICE JRE.2000 14.40 02241 ONE STOP TELECC~INICATDONS SENVICE-~fARUN t675.31 SENVICE-MARUN 343.34 2018.65 02333 PORTER LEE CORPORNTIUN SUP~ONT FEE OH PROPERTY 350.00 02344 PREISER ANRNAL HOSPITAL STRAYS 720.00 02378 QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. SUPPLIES 92.70 02393 MY D'RE~ON CO.,INC. CLOTBRNG SUPPLIES 423.80 04660 SALERNO, CHRISTOPHER REINEURSE EXPENSES 320.50 02494 SAVE-A-PNT ADOPTt~ CRNTBR STRAYS 210.00 04659 SPARR, STEVAR REINEUESE EXPENSES 320.50 02713 TRAFFIC INSTITNTB I~/~3A~S 26.00 02723 TICrTON ELECTRO~ICS, INC. RADAR REPAIR 73.50 PORTARLE RERAIRT 275.00 ' 348L50 02796 VEF CC{44UNICATIONE INC. RADI0 REPAIR 59.00 · REPORT: APBOAREBFT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: TNU~DAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGE 8 REL~SE ID : ¥IL~RE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TBUSTEES FR~ MARCE 17 2000 TO MA~C~{ 30 2000 DEPT V~NDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~E I~OICE DESCRI~ION ~OU~ 02810 VIL~GE OF M~ PROSPECT MCAT L~CHEON 337.00 02835 W~H~SE DX~ OFFICE SUPPLI~ 28.53 02893 WOLF C~, INC. PH~O PR~ESSING 28.52 C~ ~TTERIES 46.76 PH~O PR~ESSING 47.85 t23.13 T~ : 13776.16 FI~ 04794 ~, INC. SUBSCRI~I~ 54.95 02216 ~TISTIC ~EC~I~ ~S a~ ~R CAPT THIL5 41.81 01025 C~ING, ~ ~P~SES I83.79 01097 CI~ CORP ~t~ ~P~SE 24.00 CLUING SEUICEN 70.40 94.40 00331 FI~, MIC~ ~ING SUPP 75.10 ~GIST~TI~ 55.00 ~TING L~CHEON 30.58 t60.68 01390 FILE ~T FILE SYST~ SUPPLIES 61.95 01445 ~JITSU BUSINESS C~. SYNT~ SEUICE 732.00 01475 G~E~ BINDING CO~TION 4 RO~S OF ~INATE 452.94 01619 H~STON ~S~IATEN ~PLO~ TESTING 250.00 01681 ILLINOIS FI~ C~IEEN ~S~. ~GIST~TI~ 140.00 01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. PAPER 259.90 01724 I~LL SUPPLIES 1067.00 01753 IPEL~ ~GIST~TION 50.00 04798 M~S, ~CI S~ ~ ' 75.~0 ' 02241 ONE ST6P TEL~I~TI~S REUICE-~ 1642.30 SER~CE-~CH 330.78 ' 1973.08 · 02408 ~ID ~D ~S~IATES, JO~ E. ~ T~T~G 175.00 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 I5:58 RUN: TRDRSDAY MAR3000 14:52 FAGE 10 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUN MARCH 17 2000 TO MARCH 30 2000 DER VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE UNSUNI~TION AMOUNT 04520 SIGN A PJ~4A MAGNETIC CARS SIGNS 159.26 02591 SPECIALIZED RESCUE SYSTEMS SPECIAL RESCUE 390.00 02810 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DENNIS THILA 684.00 02081 WILSON, RDVIN B. EXPENSES- 63.00 TOTAL 7605.35 PUBLIC WORKS - A~INISTR 01753 IPELRE REGISTEB-LISA ANGEAL 50.00 02241 ONE STOP TELEOU{{~UNICATIONS SERVICE-MARCE 1056.35 02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 46.75 04767 ROSSBACE, JOHN RDIMB FOR CDL REMEMAL 50.00 02747 DNISUNRUN PAPER 373.75 02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES 509.29 02832 WAL-MART STORES, INC. MISC.SURDLIES 16.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.94 57.73 02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES 77.34 TOTAL 2221.21 PUBLIC WORKS - NTRDETS/B 01924 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS PARTS 658.17 01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BUILDING & HARDWARE SGPPLIES 101.00 BUILDING & HARDWARE SUPPLIES 216.20 3t7.20 01423 ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING CUNPAMY BALANCE INV38626 300.00 01033 AMDERDUN LOCK COMPANY HARDWARE SUPPLIES 333.76 HAMDWAPJ3 SUPPLIES 258.37 592.13 02167 ARROW ROAD CUNSTRDCTIO~ MATERIALS 1527.20 02803 BEVERLY GREVEL, INC. FEES FOR DIRDUNAZ 300.00 · 02849 BISHOP PLUMBING CUNFAMY MAT/LAMOR 6591.00 01014 OADE IN{R]ETEXRS CI~EAMING BUNPItRS 22t.29 ~LEAMEMG SUFPLIES 221.29 C~EANIWO BUPELIES 221.29 .REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGE 1I RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PNOSPECT LIST OF BILLS PENSENTED TO THE BOARD OF TNUSTEF~ ~EC~ ~ANC~{ 17 2000 TO MARCS 30 2000 OE~T VENDOR ~R VENDOR NAME INVOICE DRSCRI?TI(~ ANOSNT CLEANING SUPPLIES 221.29 CLEANING SUPPLIES 221.29 CLEANING SUPPLIES 739.30 1845.75 01058 CENTURY LANE, INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 305.47 013t4 DUPOET FIguRING EYSTENS FLOOR PREP-ADD CNGS 79.?5 04?68 EAARE, JO~ RE~TE 4 SQ SIDENA~K 140.00 01610 HOME DEK~ N~UBL~ SUPP 50,70 EWUBLDG SUPP 197,74 Ff~E/BL~ SUPP 9,28 bLUE/ELDG SUPP 1334 271.46 01896 J.C. LICET CC~PANY PAINTING SUPPLIES 20.48 PAINTING SUPPLIES 121.45 PAINTING SUPPLIES 159.63 301.56 04802 KING KONCRETE, INC. SNO~ P~OWING 4240.00 04799 LUSBPYNSETJ, MR. REBATE 227.50 01990 MC~ASTER-CARE STEP I~DDEE 301.67 02193 NCETENEST ELECTRSCA~ SUPPLY ELECTRICA~ SUPPLIES 2/00 251.t7 ELECTRICA~ SUPPLIES 2/00 120.73 ELECTRtCA~ SUPPLIES 2/00 t12.31 ELECTRICAl, SUPPLIES 2/00 122.55 606.76 02305 PETTY CASE - PUBLIC WORES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 2.39 04770 k~DEBAUGN, BARBARA REBATE 4SQ SIDEWALK I40.00 02613 STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY PL~ SUPP 103.79 ~L~MB SUPP 114.84 218.63 02722 TRI-STATE ELECfRONIC COR~ U~ECTRICAI, SUPPLIES 79.72 S~EC~RSCAL SUPPLIES 32.52 112.24 02806 ~M~%GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SERVICE 7.8f .SERVICE 3.57 SERVIC~ 18.71 22.13 REPORT: AREOANEN~T GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGE 12 ERELEASE I0 : VILLAGE OF MOONT PROSPECT LIST OF RILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MARCB I7 2000 TO MARCH 30 2000 ................................................................................................................................... DE~T NENDOR NBA VENDOR NAME INVOICE RESCRt~ION ANOENT ................................................................................................................................... TOTAL 19101.01 PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/ 01578 EENDRICRSEN, ROBERT W. TRIM TREES 216.00 02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 81.73 TOTAL 297.73 PUBLIC WOREN - ENGINRERI 00470 BREHOB, LEANNE CLOTHING ALLONA~CE t42.22 01147 CO~9~OEXEALTH EDISON STREET LIGHTING CHGS 9956.04 04764 DGPAGE RAILROAD SAFETY COENCIL REGISTER-~LEECRER/LAWEIE 80.00 01688 ILLINOIS GIS ASSOCIATION REGISTER-L.EREEOE 115.00 02193 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SURELIRE 2/00 205.08 02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 52.45 TOTAL 10551.29 PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEW 01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TERIAL CO. BUILDING & EARDWARE SUPPLIES 335.20 01773 k~ERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. VIDEO TAPE 158.00 2000 ~EREHIP DUES 1170.60 1328.60 01780 AMERITECH SERVICE 18.87 01833 ANDERSON LOCK CC~PANY HAREWARE SUPPLIES 30.00 02451 BADGER METER ENC RETERS ' 1574.92 METERS 799.37 2374.29 01075 CEI~GO ~TRO CWA~TEX APWA REGINTRE-SBAN DORSEY 25.00 01323 BAST JORDAN IROEXORES P~TS 470.00 01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD COURIR CRARGWE 2/00 158.56 01544 ENK ~TER ~TER SERVICE LABOR & MATERIALS 246.06 01~96. J.C. tICNT CON,ANY PAINTING SUPPLIES 259.35 01427 JO~EEN D. POP, AN & CO. PONRS 178.55 P~RTE 1446,0(t 1624.55 ' REPORT: APPOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY MAR3000 14:82 PAGE 13 RELL~E ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNC{~ MARCH 17 2000 TO M~RCE 30 2000 UNiT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION M4UNNT 01787 J~LIE, INC. SERVICE CRARGES 188.80 02042 MIN~TRMAN PRESS NOTEEADS/LETTERERAD 733.65 02193 NORT}5~EST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELECTRtCA~ SUPPLIES 2/00 404.00 02241 ONE STOP TELECC~NICATIONS SERVICE-BCE 2203.49 SERVICE-mARCH 1572.05 3775.54 02256 RADDDOK PUBLICATIONS, INC. PUBLICATION OF BID NOTICES 117.71 02305 PETTY CRSH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 6.60 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 3.24 9.84 02524 SEARS RARDWkRE SUPPLIES 239.79 02672 SYSTUNS FORMS, INC. SUPPLIES 205.50 02735 U.S. FILTER DISTRIB~TIUN GRUNP CHECK W~,VE 2005.00 02747 UNISOSRCE PAPER 37335 02796 VEF C~ICATIUNS INC. R~CHARGRABLE BATTERY 320.00 02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC.OFFICE SUPELIRS 509.30 01822 W.W. GRAINGER INC. ELECTRIC I{RATHER 240.27 02835 WkREEUNSE DIRECT SUPPLIES 508.30 02838 ~TRA ENGINEERING & ~[~NAGEi~ENT SUBSCRIPTION ~UNA~ 40.00 02893 ~OLF CAMERA, INC. FIk~qFI~ PROCESSING 10.81 02914 ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS S~R REPAIR EUEP 1401.97 PARTS 152.84 1554.81 TOTAL 18107.55 E~LIC ~O~S - R~RE DI 02016 ARC DISPOSAl, cOMPANY FEBRUNARV COLLECTIVE 4909T.02 FEBRSBARY COLLECTIUNS 10893.39 . FEBR~B~i~Y COLLECTIONS 29092.26 FEBRVBARY COLLECTIONS 2T94.19 FEBRUNARY COLARCTI~S 9249.17 110426.03 01526 UNF.~T NV~TS PUBLISHING EA!~H CARE BOOKMARES 143-.00 02241 ONE SIOP' TELECC{'R'{UNI~TI~S RERVI~-MARSH - 33,01 REPORT: APBOAERRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:50 RUN: THURSDAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGE 14 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MARCH 17 2000 TO MARCH 30 2000 DRET VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME I~OICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT TOTAL : 110602.04 PUBLIC MORES - VEHICLE M 01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BUILDING & HARDMARE SUPPLIES 00.72 01169 AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. BLADES 48.00 03991 ALL STAR AUTO GLASS REPLACE WINDSHIELD GLASS 250.00 01790 AMOCO OIL COMPANT SERVICE 38.86 04795 COOL HEAT AC DELCO RADIATOR 270.00 04570 CUSTOM VEHICLE SYSTEMS, INC. SUPPLIES 27.92 01236 DAVE & JIM'S AUTO BODY, INC. WHEEL ALIGNI4ENT P-6 35.00 01444 FRIES AUTOM~IVE SERVICE 217.50 01511 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES TIRES 526.08 01914 LUND INDUSYRIWH, INC. REPAIRS TO CAR 303.15 02241 ONE STOP TELECC~ViUNICATIONS SERVICE-MARCH 123.79 02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC EDRRS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 3.20 02336 POWER EQUIPMENT LEASING CO EMSREC~/REPAIR 2622.51 INSPECT/REPAIR 537.03 3159.54 02404 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION CLSh~ & SERVICE PARTS 390.00 02543 SHOP EQUIP. SPECIATISTS INC EXTENDED WAREA~Y PIA~ 2310.00 02575 ENA~-O~ INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 39.47 04101 SPI DISTRIB~PON INC. AC DELCO F~L P~P 58.10 02769 U[~91 A~TO SUPPLY AC DELCO REPAIR P~TS 684.74 AC DELCO REPAIR PA~TS 42.18 726.92 02791 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROORk~ TRUCK LITE LAMPS 593.78 TRECEAITE LAMP 237.55 031.33 TOTAL.: 9452.58 , CC{44UNIYY SERVICE PROORA 01267 DIG' CERI,~2~ RSSOULAYRE 4TN OF ~3LY PARADE 2975.00 00327 FARLEY, JANICE REIMAUP~E~v2ENT 345376 REPORT: APSOARDRPT GREERATED: 5 NOV 99 I5:58 RUN: THURSDAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGE 15 RELRASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRDSTEES FRD~ ~/~UN 17 2000 TO MEKCH 30 2000 RE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION kEOUNT 04765 RARSEW, MEI~IE REIMS-PHOTO BOOKS 17.20 02067 MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICk~ SOCI APRIL PNT 2916.67 02378 Q~ICK PRINT PLUS, INC. MS~O RADS/TIC~'7 ORDER 60.00 02444 RIVER TRAILS P~kK DISTRICT DONATION-RARTH DAY EVENT 600.00 02455 RONEY, ASICE M. 1999 GRANT 100.00 02467 RO~SK-~DHURST SHOP CRET,INC. RENT-APRIL 2000.00 TOTAL : 9014.63 CNEITt5 I/{PROVS~ENT 01227 AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC. EQUIPMENT 61850.00 04124 ALREEC~ ENTERPRISES SOIL REMOVA5 18650.40 EQUIPMENT AND I~OR 95260.92 113911.32 02167 A~ROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION STREET RECONSTRUCTION 48849.79 01049 CD~ EOVNEMEENT, INC NE LJ 2100M 761.99 02476 EARTH TECH INC PR$-MELLER CREEK 1860.03 01445 fUJITSU BUSINESS CO9{. SYSTRES COM.REV.RS~OD. 451.00 01469 GATEWAY CUNP~IES INC. MONITORS 317.00 01610 EC~{E DEPOT INV5210485 68.96 INV5020297 65.50 INV5011998 295.9I 430.37 01791 K-PLNE KNVIRONEENTAL, INC. SERVICE 23925.00 01957 ~[%RNERTEK VIDEO SUPPLY PONCU ROUTER 879.08 01312 R. W. DUNTREAN CO. CEW~RAL RD INTR. 94199.00 02521 SDI CONSULTANTS LTD. SERVICE 6430.27 ENGINEERING S~V 1647.85 CE~R~ I~PROV. 28000.00 ~6078.12 02671 SYNTEME UUN$~TANTS. lEO. TRAVE~ ~PRERES 997.23 TO~A~ : 3S~111.B3 01335 ARE:{IAN BROTRERE ~DICAL CEWTR $~NTCE ~DKRED 229.00 REPORT: REBOAROMPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 89 I5:58 ROM: THURSDAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGE 16 RSL~AFE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENVED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~ON MARCH 17 2000 TO MARCH 30 2000 DER VENDOR NBR VENDOR NA~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOOMT ..................................................................... . ............................................................. 01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. BODY REPAIRS 1903.55 01966 MARTIN BOYER COMPANY,INC WOREERS COMP FEE 3800.00 WORKERS CC~P 12062.88 15862.88 02198 NORT~{I{~ST RADIOLONY RSSDO.E.C. SERVICE 22.00 02550 SIGN PALACE LETTERING ON P'3 95.00 02852 ~ERDERETOM, RANDALL REIMBURSEi~ENV 48.00 TOTAL : 18160.43 GI~AND TOTAL : 1027534.90 GREERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:08 R~N: THURSDAY MAR3000 14:52 PAGE 17 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ MARCH 17 2000 TO MARCH 30 2000 S~ARY BY FUND 001 GENERAL FUND 385432.77 030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 110602.04 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 122199.80 070 CO~f~ITY DEVELl%9{T BLOCK GRET 1900.34 510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 64208.48 530 CAPITAL IMPROVE~ENT CONST FUND 1647.85 550 DO~NTOWN REREV~P~ CONST 144266.59 560 STREET IMPROVE~g~NT CONST FUND 48849.79 . 590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST F~ND 1860.03 610 WATER AND RE~ER FUND 18226.08 630 PARKING SYST~ REVENUE FU~D 10.71 660 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 19176.26 680 C~POTER REPLAC~NT FInD t078.99 690 RISK MANARERE~NT FUND 43002.21 710 POLICE PRESION FUND 23793.60 720 FIRE PENSION F~ND 20906.17 730 BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 544.28 790 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 19828.91 TOTAL: 1027534.90 PROCLAMATION EARTH DAY APRIL 22, 2000 WHEREAS, constantly aware of the problem created by the increasing use of non-recyclable products, the United States Conference of Mayors has, as in previous years, announced the "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle" Earth Day Challenge; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this celebration is to emphasize the importance of preserving our natural environment through recycling; and WHEREAS, local authorities, on behalf of the community, salute the organizers of and participants in this worthy crusade aimed towards the preservation of our planet. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, illinois, do hereby proclaim Apd122, 2000 as EARTH DAY and in observance thereof I call upon residents of the Village of Mount Prospect to join with me in the celebration of this important date. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 4t~ day of April, 2000. PROCLAMATION ARBOR DAY April 28, 2000 WHEREAS, trees, shrubs, and flowers are a great part of the scenic beauty of our Village and of our nation, in addition to providing for good soil and healthy plant life which is essential to the general economy and agriculture of our nation; and WHEREAS, trees shrubs, and plant-life in general are among God's gifts to many and should be preserved and appreciated; and WHEREAS, the planting of trees in Mount Prospect will also help conserve energy use by shading and cooling buildings and pavement. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim Friday, April 28, 2000, as ARBOR DAY in the Village of Mount Prospect and urge educators to teach our youth the benefits derived from plant life and encourage the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect to continue to plant and maintain such plant life throughout the Village. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 4th day of April, 2000. PROCLAMATION ALCOHOL AWARENESS MONTH APRIL, 2000 WHEREAS, underage drinking is the number one drug problem among the nation's youth; and WHEREAS, the use of alcohol is associated with the leading causes of death and injury among youth, including motor vehicle crashes, homicides and suicides; and WHEREAS, juvenile crime, violence and poor academic performance arc closely linked with underage drinking; and WHEREAS, approximately 2/3 of teenagers who drink still rcpor~ that they can buy their own alcoholic beverages; and WHEREAS, passage of other laws to rcduce underage drinking, and enforcement of those laws is a community and state responsibility. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby join with the Illinois Alcohol Awarcness Month campaign, and proclaim the month of April, 2000 as ALCOHOL AWARENESS MONTH in Mount Prospect, and I call upon all citizens in the Village of Mount Prospect to recognize alcohol use as a serious problem for the youth in our community. Gerald L. Fadey Mayor ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 4~h day of April, 2000. PROCLAMATION AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY'S "RELAY FOR LIFE" MAY 6-7, 2000 WHEREAS, more than 8,000,000 living Americans have a history of cancer, which is the second leading cause of death in the United States; and WHEREAS, in the United States, one of every four deaths is from cancer, resulting in more than 1,500 deaths every day; and WHEREAS, in 1946, 25% of cancer patients survived five years after diagnosis, and today the survival rate is up to 60%; and WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society is the nationwide community-based voluntary health orgardzation dedicated to eliminating cancer as a major health problem by preventing cancer, saving lives and diminishing suffering from cancer through research, education, advocacy, and service; and WHEREAS, on May 16 and 17, 2000, Mount Prospect residents are proud to join the local chapter of the American Cancer Society in its premier fund raiser event, the annual "Relay for Life"; and WHEREAS, those who have advanced the cause of cancer research through their valiant efforts in fighting the disease will be recognized, as will those whose lives were lost to cancer; and VOrlEREAS, by supporting the efforts of the American Cancer Society, we help the suffering of countless others and move closer to finding a cure for this disease. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby encourage residents of Mount Prospect to join other communities in promoting The American Cancer Society's "Relay for Life" on May 6 and May 7, 2000 in recognition of those facing the challenges of cancer with courage and determination, Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 4th day of April, 2000. VWL 3/24/00 3130100 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 120 NORTH YATES LANE WHEREAS, Lawrence Metzger (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 120 Yates Lane (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 270 in 3~ Addition to Bluett's Fairview Gardens, being a subdivision of part of the E¼ of the SE¼ of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois on January 19, 1962 as Document No. 2016922 and Certificate of Correction thereof registered on March 14, 1962 as Document No. 2023843 and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation to construct a wood deck in the side interior yard, encroaching three feet (3') into the minimum side yard required in Section 14.902.B.1of the Mount Prospect Village Code; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of ZBA Case No. 02-00 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of February, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 9th day of February, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation would be in the. best interest of the Village. Page 2/2 120 Yates Lane NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14.902.B.1 of the Village Code, to allow the construction of a wood deck in the side intedor yard, which will encroach three-feet (3') into the minimum side yard required by the Mount Prospect Village Code, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk VWL/ 3~30~00 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING EXCEPTIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 301 SOUTH I-OKA AVENUF WHEREAS, St. Raymond's Parish (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner) is the owner of the property generally located at 301 S. I-Oka Avenue (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) and legally described as follows: Part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested an exception to the requirements of the Development Code, Section 16.405.F.1, for storm water detention for a building addition to the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the request for an exception from Section 16.405.F. 1 of Chapter 16 (Development Code) for the Subject Property at their regular meeting on March 15, 2000, said request being the subject of PC 01-00 and by a unanimous vote recommended to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village to grant the exception from Chapter 16 as requested; and WHEREAS, at same meeting, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect, by a unanimous vote, recommended to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village, the recording of a covenant requiring the construction and installation of street lighting, as required by Village Code at such time as Village staff deems it necessary; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded their recommendation being the subject of PC 01~00 to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD .OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. Page 2 of 2 St. Raymond SECTIQN TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property an exception from Section 16.405.F.1 of Chapter 16 (Development Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect for storm water detention for a specific portion of the Subject Property, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A," and that a covenant requiring the future construction and installation of street lighting shall be recorded. SECTION THREE: Except for the modifications granted herein, all other requirements of said Development Code shall apply to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk vwl/ 3/15/00 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS PHASE lB OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND MAIN STREET WHEREAS, Norwood Builders (hereinafter rbferred to as Petitioner), has filed a petition for a Conditional Use in the nature of a Planned Unit Development with respect to property generally known as the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street, Phase lB of downtown redevelopment) (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Lots 6-10, inclusive, in Block 13 in Busse and Wille's Resubdivision in Mount Prospect, in the West half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, and the West 22' of Lot 8 and all of Lots 9 and 10 in Mount Prospect Subdivision of part of the NW¼ North of railroad in the NE¼ of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded September 2, 1874 as Document Number 188460, all in Cook County, I!linois; and WHEREAS, Petitioner desires to create a Planned Unit Development providing for the construction of a mixed-use structure containing 22,700 sq. ft. of commercial space, and 34 condominium units, with thirty-two (32) on-site surface parking spaces, eighteen (18) on-street spaces, and fifty-one (51) underground parking spaces, as provided in Section 14.904 and Section 14.502 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit, designated as ZBA Case No. 37-99, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of February, 2000, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 9th day of February, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the .President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA 37-99 and has determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount prospect would be served by granting to the Subject Property the Conditional Use in the nature of a Planned Unit Development as requested in ZBA 37~99. ' Page 2 of 3 Norwood, Phase 1B NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That the Conditional Use. in the nature of a Planned Unit Development being the subject of this Ordinance is subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in conformance with the site plan prepared by Haylock Design; Inc., dated January 31, 2000 (Attachment 1), Basement Garage Plan prepared by Haylock Design, Inc., dated January 24, 2000 (Attachment 2), and colored elevations prepared by HKM Architects + Planners, Inc., dated April 26, 1999 (attached). 2. Submission of samples of all proposed building materials and approval of such building materials by the Village Board. 3. Provide a year-round dining area in place of the proposed outside dining area, and extend the second and third floor living units and the building fac~ade over that area. 4. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Village of Mount Prospect to ensure that the tenant mix of the building's commercial space fulfils the requirements of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 5. Approval by the Plan Commission and Village Board of a Plat of Subdivision for the subject property, including all required easements, prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Provision of appropriate agreements to allow for Village enforcement of parking regulations in surface parking areas. 7. Provision of apprepdate easements to allow for Village maintenance of streetscape areas on private property and to ensure public access to streetscape areas. 8. Redesign the parking bay to the rear of the commercial building south of the Sakura Restaurant (105 S. Main Street) to comply with staff comments in the Parking section of this report. 9. Submission of a final landscape plan meeting all requirements of Article XXlil Landscape Code of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code and providing for appropriate foundation planting areas and landscape features such as tree plantings and raised planter'boxes to accent on-sit pedestrian areas. 10. The applicant shall participate financially in the design and selection of appropriate focal points, such as public art, street furniture, or public gathering spaces at the comers of Emerson Street and NOrthwest Highway and Main Street and Northwest Highway. Page 3 of 3 Norwood, NW Hwy & Main 11. Submittal and approval of final Engineering Plans meeting all Development Code requirements and/or approval by the Plan Commission and Village Board of any necessary Development Code Exceptions. 12. Provision of an executed parking agreement with a nearby property to provide an additional 32 parking spaces to meet the site parking requirement. 13. Submittal of final building plans meeting, all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 14. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVEDthis dayof .,2000. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk vwl/ 3115/00 ORDINANCE NO.. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS PHASE lB OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND MAIN STREET WHEREAS, Norwood Builders (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner), has filed a petition for a Conditional Use in the nature of a Planned Unit Development with respect to property generally known as the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street, Phase lB of downtown redevelopment) (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Lots 6-10, inclusive, in Block 13 in Busse and Wille's Resubdivision in Mount Prospect, in the West half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, and the West 22' of Lot 8 and all of LOts 9 and 10 in Mount Prospect Subdivision of part of the NW¼ North of railroad in the NE¼ of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded September 2, 1874 as Document Number 188460, all in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, Petitioner desires to create a Planned Unit Development providing for the construction of a mixed-use structure containing 22,700 sq. ft. of commercial space, and 34 condominium units, with thirty-two (32) on-site surface parking spaces, eighteen (18) on-street spaces, and fifty-one (51) underground parking spaces, as provided in Section 14.904 and Section 14.502 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit, designated as ZBA Case No. 37-99, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24"' day of February, 2000, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been published in the Mount Prosoect Daily Herald on the 9th day of February, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the .President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA 37-99 and has determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting to the Subject Property the Conditional Use in the nature of a Planned Unit Development as requested in ZBA 37~99. Page 2 of 3 Norwood, Phase lB NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That the Conditional Use. in the nature of a Planned Unit Development being the subject of this Ordinance is subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in conformance with the site plan prepared by Haylock Design; Inc., dated January 31, 2000 (Attachment 1), Basement Garage Plan prepared by Haylock Design, Inc., dated January 24, 2000 (Attachment 2), and colored elevations prepared by HKM Architects + Planners, Inc., dated April 26, 1999 (attached). 2. Submission of samples of all proposed building materials and approval of such building materials by the Village Board. 3. Provide a year-round dining area in place of the proposed outside dining area, and extend the second and third floor living units and the building fac,,ade over that area. 4. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Village of Mount Prospect to ensure that the tenant mix of the building's commercial space fulfils the requirements of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 5. Approval by the Plan Commission and Village Board of a Plat of Subdivision for the subject property, including all required easements, prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Provision of appropriate agreements to allow for Village enforcement of parking regulations in surface parking areas. 7. Provision of appropriate easements to allow for Village maintenance of streetscape areas on private property and to ensure public access to streetscape areas. 8. Redesign the parking bay to the rear of the commercial building south of the Sakura Restaurant (105 S. Main Street) to comply with staff comments in the parking section of this report. 9. Submission of a final landscape plan meeting all (equirements of Article XXlII Landscape Code of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code and providing for appropriate foundation planting areas and landscape features such as tree plantings and raised planter boxes to accent on-sit pedestrian areas. 10. The applicant shall participate financially in the design and selection of appr°pdate focal points, such as public art; Street furniture, or public gathering spaces at the ,, comers of Emerson Street and Northwest Highway and Main Street and Northwest Highway, Page 3 of 3 Norwood, NW Hwy & Main 11. Submittal and approval of final Engineering Plans meeting all Development Code requirements and/or approval by the Plan Commission and Village Board of any necessary Development Code Exceptions. 12. Provision of an executed parking agreement with a nearby property to provide an additional 32 parking spaces to meet the site parking requirement. 13. Submittal of final building plans meeting, all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 14. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H ~GEN~Ies'~WlN'~RDINAN ,C~PLID.NOm~COd. NW HWy & Main. Mac-2000.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, the Petitioner (Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect) have filed an application for certain text amendments to Chapter 14 (Zoning) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to amend vadous regulations; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks amendments to the following Sections of the Village Code: Section 14.701 Purpose Section 14.702 Permitted Uses Section 14.703 Conditional Uses Section 14.704 Bulk Regulations Section 14.705 Landscaping WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the proposed amendments, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 05-00, before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 24, 2000, pursuant to due and proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 9th day of February, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given consideration to the requests being the subject of ZBA 05-00. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TVVO: Section 14.701 entitled "Purpose" of Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "The C-R Distdct is intended to provide for the location of public parks, golf courses, swimming pools, community facilities, and other open space uses or resources to serve the recreational needs of the citizens of the Village." SECTION THREE: Section 14.702 entitled "Permitted Uses" of Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "In the C-R Conservation Recreation district, the only uses which may hereafter be established are: A. Parks and playgrounds. B.' Unlighted ball fields. Page 2 of 4 Text amendments C. Golf courses. D. Tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar recreational activities. E. Nature preservation areas. F. Accessory structures incidental to and on the same zoning lot as the permitted use. G. Wireless service facilities shall be permitted as set forth in Section 14.313. E. of this Chapter." _SECTION FOUR: Section 14.703 entitled "Conditional Uses" of Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the current Section 14.703 and adding a new Section 14.703, which shall read as follows: "The following uses may be allowed by conditional use issued in accordance with the provisions of subsection 14.203.F. of this Zoning Ordinance: A. Recreational complexes, conservatories, studios, museums, community centers and similar institutions. B. Lighted ball fields. C. Planned developments in conformance with Article V of this Chapter. D. Detention or retention facilities E. Accessory structures, incidental to, and on the same zoning lot as the conditional use." SECTION FIVE: Section 14.704 entitled "Bulk Regulations" of Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting Section 14.704 and adding a new Section 14.704 which shall read as follows: "14.704. BULK REGULATIONS: A. Yard Requirements: Buildings. Any building hereafter constructed or relocated in the C-R District shall maintain minimum yards as follows: 1. All O-R zoned properties: Front yard 50 feet Exterior side yard 50 feet 2. Property lines abutting non-residential property: Interior side yard Equal to the required setback in the adjacent district to the common property line Rear yard Equal to the required setback in the adjacent distdct to the common property line 3. Property lines abutting residential property: Interior side yard 50.feet Rear yard 50 feet Page 3 of 4 Text amendments B. Yard Requirements: Other Structures. Any structure, other than a building, hereafter constructed or relocated in the C-R Distdct shall maintain minimum yards as follows: 1. All C-R zoned properties: Front yard 10 feet Extedor side yard 10 feet 2. Property lines abutting non-residential property: Interior side yard 10 feet Rear yard 10 feet 3. Property lines abutting residential property: Interior side yard 25 feet Rear yard 25 feet C. Lot Coverage: No lot in the C-R District shall be developed with total impervious surfaces exceeding twenty-five percent (25%). D. Height Limitations 1. No buildings shall exceed three (3) stodes or thirty feet (30') in height, whichever is less. 2. No other structures shall exceed sixty feet (60') in height. E. Yard Requirements: No accessory structure shall be located in a required yard of the CoR District unless otherwise provided for in this section. F. Permitted Obstructions in Required Yards. Structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards in the C-R District as follows: 1. Sidewalks, steps, bike paths, and similar facilities up to ten feet (10') in width. 2. Driveways. 3. Eaves, storm gutters, chimneys, and bay windows extending into such yards not more than twenty-four inches (24')." SECTION SlX: Section 14.705 entitled "Landscaping" of Chapter 14 (Zoning), is hereby created, and shall read as follows: "A. Parking lots and buildings in the C-R District shall be landscaped according to the requirements of Article XXlII." Page 4 of 4 Text amendments SECTION SEVEN: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L. Farley Village President A'FI'EST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE V ENTITLED "METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE VILLAGE CODE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That paragraphs A and B of Section 22.504.2 entitled %Vater Rates" of Article V entitled UMeters and Rates" of Chapter 22 of ~he Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 22.504.2.A and Section 22.504.2.B shall be and read as follows: " Sec. 22.504.2 Water Rates. A. All Village users within the Village, having a direct or indirect connection with Village water mains or pipes shall pay the following rate: Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof $3.35 B. All Village users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect connection with Village water mains or pipes shah pay the following rate: Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof $6.71" SECTION TWO: That paragraph C of Section 22.504.3 entitled "Sewer Rates" of Article V entitled "Meters and Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village Cede, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 22.504.3.C shall be and read as follows: " C. Rate: 1. All Village sewer users within the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer and water mains or pipes shall pay the following sewer rate, based upon the amount of water consumed to which sewer service is furnished: Per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof $0.35 2. All Village sewer users within the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect connection with the V'fllage sewer maim or pipes and not with the Village water mains or pipes shall pay a fiat rate of: Per month per dwelling unit $2.90 3. All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer and water mains or pipes, shall pay the following sewer rate based upon the amount of water consumed to which sewer service is furnished: Per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof $0.35 4. All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer mains or pipes, but not with Village water maim or pipes, shall pay a flat rate of: Per month per dwelling unit $2.90" SECTION THREE: That the fees set forth in this Ordinance shall be applied to all water and sewer bills rendered after June 1, 2000. SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shall be in full foree and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L. Farley, Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk VII,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: ~iARCH 29, 2000 HEARING DATE: APRIL 4, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-06-2000 - 204 S. I-OKA AVENUE CONDITIONAL USE FOR A FRONT PORCH ENCROACHING 5' INTO THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK AND A VARIATION TO ALLOW 55% LOT COVERAGE JAMES AND DEBORAH MCGOUGH (APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS) Yhe Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use to permit construction ora front porch encroaching five feet into the required front yard setback at 204 S. I-Oka. The subject property is an existing 1½- stow home located on a single-family lot encroaching by approximately one inch into the required minimum front setback. The home has an existing bay window extending approximately 5 inches into the front setback and a stoop extending 4 feet into the front setback. The house also has a non-conforming side setback of approximately 4.5' from the south property line (5 feet is required). That applicant proposes to construct a 726 s.f. first floor addition, a 1,492 s.f. second story addition, a new two-car garage, front and rear porches, a driveway extension and a paver-block patio. The building addition and the two porches would continue the current non-conforming interior side setback along the south property line (and would not require a variation). The garage and driveway will meet all setback requirements, however, the proposed additions would increase the proposed lot coverage on the property to 55% (a maximum of 50% permitted). The applicant's rationale the Conditional Use is primarily related to the aesthetics of the proposed slrueture. The Variation request comes from not wanting to leave "dead space" behind the garage and from safety concerns about such an area. ZBA members were impressed by the quality of the proposed addition and very supportive of the Conditional Use request. However, they were concerned that the 55% lot coverage would set a precedent for such variations and lead to increased storm water flooding problems. The ZBA suggested that the petitioner at least move closer to the required 50% lot coverage requirement. Based on their consideration of the facts, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 5-0 to recommend approval for a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach 5' into the required front setback. They also denied the proposed Variation to permit an increase to the maximum lot coverage requirement to 55% for the residence at 204 S. I-Oka Avenue, Case No. ZBA-06-~000. The Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use. While the ZBA's decision is final for the requested variation, the petitioner has exercised their right to appeal that decision to the Village Board (letter attached). They will be presenting that appeal, along with their Conditional Use request, at the April 4, 2000 Village Boards meeting. William J. Codney Jr., AICP /JP .\\VH~V02/DEFI1COMDEV~GElqlPLNG/ZBAX2~A 2000kMEJ Memos'~BA-06-2000 (McGough Porch) mej memo.doe 03/28,'00 15:30 FAX 1 847 253 3063 TINAGLIA DESIGN TINAGLIA DESIGN GROUP, INC. ARCHITECTS DESIGNERS PLANNERS Match 2IL 2000 Mike Blue Vilhgc o-r Maunl Prospect Commuaity Develol~ne,~ De4~, Building Divixion 1 O0 8outh Emc*son Strcct Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: McGough Residence Aci~ilJon and Rcnovalion 204 South 14Jka, lVloum Proq~ct Wc ~ ~bmilling this wtilt~:n ~otice on behalf of ]aime and Debbie McGough lo appel tl~ dCCiSi0n of the gn ning ~azX[ do~iil~ our reql]est fo~ nn i]]c~'ease ill tb.e aI]owaT,~ ¢ ICR ~-C~a C(P~rap~c. 23, wc T~questcd a vaxiance of ~% of Lh~ BllowabI~ lo~ COV~Tag¢ ~nd w~c ..~_ i~:l by the Z~mieg Boazd. Piease forward this info~'mafio~ to fhe ~v~]]Iage ]~rarcl so bhat we may bc l~d at the upcoming Apri] 4'" me,ting m request a~ apl~d~on this d~:Lqio~t VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ART,ENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNER DATE: MARCH 17, 2000 HEARING DATE: MARCH23,2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-06-2000- 204 S. I-OKA AVENUE CONDITIONAL USE FOR A FRONT PORCH ENCROACHING 5' INTO THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK AND A LOT COVERAGE VARIATION TO PERMIT A BUH,~ING AND GARAGE ADDITION BACKGROUND INFORMATION Petitioner: James and Deborah McGough 204 S. I-Oka Avenue Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Status of Petitioner: Owners of the Property Parcel Number: 08-11-212-015 Lot Size: 7,779 square feet Existing Zoning: RA Single Family Residence Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence Lot Coverage: 32% existing 55% proposed 50% maximum per RA district Requested Action: BACKGROUND AND PROPOSAL The subject property is an existing l~-story home located on a single-family lot on a residential street. The home is currently set back 29.86' from the front lot line and encroaches by approximately one inch into the required minimum front setback. The home has an existing bay window extending approximately 5 inches into the front setback and a stoop extending 4 feet into the front setback. The existing house has a non-conforming side setback of approximately 4.5' from the south property line. The applicant proposes to construct a 726 s.f. first floor addition, a 1,492 s.f. second story addition, a new two-car garage, fi'ont and rear porches, a dri~,eway extension, and a paver-block patio. The garage and driveway will meet all setback requirements. The building addition and the two porches would continue the current non-conforming interior side setback along the south property l~ne and the front porch would encroach into the required front yard setback by 5'. The proposed addit!ons would increase the proposed lot cox/e~age on the property to 55%. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of March 23, 2000 ZBA-06-2000 Page 2 The petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to allow the front porch addition to encroach 5' into the required front yard. The proposed additions would also require a Variation to increase the maximum lot coverage form 50% to 55%. Section 14.402.B of the Zoning Codes permits additions to single family residences with non-conforming side or rear setbacks that extend the structure with the established non-conforming setback. Thus, the proposal does not require a Variation for the extension of the non-conforming side yard setback. The proposal does not increase the extent of the non-conforming front yard setback and can, therefore, be permitted according to Section 14.401 .B. The petitioner's rationale for the Conditional Use is primarily related to the aesthetics of the proposed structure. The porch addition would improve the appearance of the house and increase its "street appeal." The applicant's Variation request is related to their desire to move their garage as farto the back of the lot. Placing the garage farther forward on the lot would leave a sizeable "dead space" between the garage and the rear lot line. They have safety concerns with this area, due~o its lack of visibility from the house. They also feel that bringing the garage forward will diminish the usefulness of their rear yard. To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use and Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. REQUIRED FINDINGS Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: The Conditional Use will n6t have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; [] Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and [] Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 7,779 square foot parcel developed with a single family home. The applicant proposes an addition consisting of an addition to the rear of the house, a second story, a garage, front and rear porches, and a patio. Other than the front porch, all of the proposed additions can be permitted under current setback requirements. The porch encroachment into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the R1 district and meets all other zoning requirements, except lot coverage, which is discussed below. The proposed porch is part of a large addition to the existing structure that will enhance its appearance and value. The proposal would have limited negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance will the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements, except lot coverage. The essential character of the neighborhood - a slngle-family residential area - would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have a negative effect on the public welfare. Variation Standards Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These standards relate to: n A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; ount Prosp~t Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of March 23, 2000 ZBA-06-2000 Page 3 c2 lack of desire to increase financial gain; and c2 protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 7,779 square foot parcel developed with a single family home with an attached single-car garage. The applicant proposes a large addition to the house, a two-car garage, a driveway extension, front and rear porches, and a patio. The proposed improvements cause the lot to exceed the maximum lot coverage requirement for the RA Zoning District. The applicant's stated reasons for the proposed variation are related to safety concerns and maintaining the usefulness of their rear yard. However, no particular condition of the lot, makes the proposed Variation necessary. The petitioner has several options to meet the 50% lot coverage requirement, and still have all of the proposed improvements. The proposal exceeds the maximum lot coverage requirement by 368 s.f. The applicant can meet the lot coverage by moving the garage closer to the house and making small adjustments to the other proposed improvements. There is not sufficient justification for a Variation by the above hardship standards. Lack of hardship notwithstanding, the proposal would not be likely to have a negative effect on the character of the existing single-family residential area or on the public welfare. In fact, the proposed improvements will be likely to have a significant positive effect. RECOMMENDATION The proposed porch addition enhances the existing home and the Conditional Use request meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach 5' into the required front setback for the residence at 204 S. I-Oka Avenue, Case No. ZBA-06-2000 The Village Board's decision is final for this item. Although the proposed variation would not have a significant effect on neighborhood character, the submittal does not support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA deny the proposed Variation to permit an increase to the maximum lot requirement for the residence at 204 S. I-Oka Avenue, Case No. ZBA-06-2000. The ZBA's decision is final for this item. I concur: William J Coo~y, AIC~P, Dl?e~ctc r c f c~ mO !anlty Development /JP H:\GE~PLNG~ZBAXZBA 2000~taffMem~ZBA-06-2000 (McGough).doc Wapella Avenue Lusi Avenue Avenue t~; E~hurs nne WffieS~eet I-OKA AVENUE PROPOSED SITE PLAN MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-06-2000 Hearing Date: March 23, 2000 PETITIONER: James and Deborah McGough SUBJECT PROPERTY: 204 S. I-Oka Avenue PUBLICATION DATE: March 8, 2000 DAILY HERALD REQUEST: Conditional Use. and Variation to allow construction of a front porch encroaching 5' into the required front yard setback and lot coverage Variation. MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Leo Floros Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Arlene Juracek, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: James and Deborah McGough James Tinaglia Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the February 24, 2000 meeting were approved with corrections. At 8:00 p.m., after hearing one case under Old Business, Ms. Juracek introduced Case ZBA-06-2000, 204 S. I-Oka. Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices, and through signage on the property. He indicated that the case was a Conditional Use request for an unenclosed front porch and variation request for lot coverage. The subject property is an existing 1½-story home located on a single-family lot currently set back 29.86' from the from lot line, encroaching by approximately one inch into the required minimum front setback. The home has an existing bay window extending approximately 5 inches into the front setback and a stoop extending 4 feet into the front setback. The house also has a non-conforming side setback of approximately 4.5' from the south property line, five feet is required. Mr. Blue explained that applicant proposes to construct a 726 s.f. first floor addition, a 1,492 s.f. second story addition, a new two-car garage, front and rear porches, a driveway extension, and a paver-block patio. The garage and driveway will meet all setback requirements. The building addition and the two porches would continue the current non-conforming interior side sethaek along the south property line (and would not require a variation) and the front porch would encroach into the required front yard setback by 5'. The proposed additions would increase the proposed lot coverage on the property to 55%, requiring a Variation as 50% is required. Mr. Blue continued, saying that the petitioner's rationale for the Conditional Use is primarily related to the aesthetics of the proposed structure. The Variation request is based on the petitioner's desire to not leave "dead space" behind the garage and having safety concerns about that area. As for review f'mdings regarding the proposed Conditional Use, Mr2 Blue noted that the porch would enhance the home and the sUrrounding area, and that the proposal did meet all other zoning requirements except lot coverage. As for the variation, where a hardship unique to the property must be shown, it was noted.that while the request would. · Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-06-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 have limited negative impact on the area, there were alternatives that could reduce or eliminate the need for a variation. So the standard set by the zoning ordinance for variations is not met in this case. Therefore, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach 5' into the required front setback and deny the proposed Variation to permit an increase to the maximum lot coverage requirement to 55% for the residence at 204 S. I-Oka Avenue, Case No. ZBA-06-2000. Mr. Blue noted that the Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use, and that the ZBA's decision is final for the requested variation. Merrill Cotten asked if the handrail around the porch was within the proposed 5' encroachment or in addition to the 5' floor of the porch. Jim Tinaglia, architect, was sworn in and responded to Mr. Cotten's question that the handrail is within the 5' encroachment. Ms. Juracek asked if the petitioner wanted to speak. James and Deborah McGough were sworn in. Mr. McGough explained he was asking for a Conditional Use and Variation to allow construction of a front porch encroaching 5' into the required front yard setback. He said they needed more space and, after looking at surrounding communities over the past year, decided they wanted to stay in their present neighborhood. Ms. Juracek told the petitioner that the proposed addition was very attractive but the Board does not easily grant requests to exceed lot coverage requirements and they are requesting 5% over the Code specifications. She said granting such requests leads to future problems with flooding. She asked the petitioner if they had considered any alternatives. Mr. McGough said they had considered cutting down the size of the patio and entranceway, putting a center strip of grass down the driveway, eliminating the back porch or bringing the garage forward. They did not want to have a space behind the garage because their children would be enticed to that area and get into mischief. He said they were willing to grade the land to minimize any water problems. Ms. Juracek asked if the Board had questions of the petitioner or if anyone in the audience wished to speak. Ms. Juracek closed the Public Hearing at 8:15 p.m. and brought the request back to the Board. Leo Floros said he had visited the site and wanted to commend and congratulate the petitioners for planning this ambitious project. He said the porch would significantly enhance the home and the area and he would support the petitioner's request. Keith Youngquist also complimented the petitioners on the project but said that while the lot coverage issue sounded trivial it could have a snowball effect. He asked the petitioners to consider making changes that would stay within the 50% lot coverage. Mr. Rogers said he also would request the petitioners to make some accommodations and hold to 50% coverage. Mr. Floros made a motion to recommend approval for a Conditional Use to allow a front porch to encroach 5' into the required front setback at 204 S. I-Oka. Mr. Youngquist seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 5-0. oning Board of Appeals ZBA-06-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3 Mr. Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for a lot coverage Variation to permit a building and garage addition at the same address. Mr. Cotten seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros NAYS: Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek Motion was denied 3-2. At 9:20 p.m., after two more cases were heard under New Business, Mr. Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary Michael l~lue k,~ j. Deputy Director of Community Development VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: D CTOR OF DEWLOP DATE: MARCH 29, 2000 HEARING DATE: APRIL 4, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-07-2000 - 1 E. RAND ROAD CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO PERMIT A 10,800 SQUARE FOOT DRUG STORE WITH DRIVE-THROUGH AND ASSOCIATED VARIATION JOHN WOJTILA OF THE ZAREMBA GROUP (PETITIONER AND CONTRACT PURCHASER) The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use and associated Variation for a drug store with drive-through and retail space at the southeast corner of Kensington Road and Elmhurst Road. The site is about two acres in size and contains a vacant commercial structure (the former Heilig Meyers store). The applicant proposes to construct a 10,880 square foot C.V.S. Pharmacy and 10,000 square feet of addifional retail space. The site would include 85 parking spaces and associated landscaping. The drive through facility, which is a Conditional Use in the B-3 Community Shopping District, is on the west side of the building and is set back 30 feet from the exterior side property line. The Variation is requested for a required landscape setback on the west side of the property. The Staff and ZBA reviews considered potential impacts of the ring road system being considered by IDOT. The reviews also considered the Corridor Design Guidelines currently under development by the Village. This site is a key opportunity to improve the appearance of the intersection, as identified by the Village's urban design consultant. Staff has been working with the applicant to provide appropriate landscaping for the area. In discussing the proposal, the ZBA noted that the development would be an improvement to the site and the area. They also noted that the impacts on the surrounding area, which is currently a very busy commercial district, would be minimal. Based on that discussion and the facts of this ease, the ZBA recommended approval of the proposed Conditional Use and Variation to permit the establishment of a CVS Pharmacy with drive-through and 10,000 square feet of additional retail space at 1 E..Rand Road, Case No. ZBA-07-2000, with the conditions listed below: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by the Sear-Brown Group, dated February 10, 2000 and revised March 15, 2000 (Attachment 1). 2. Submission of a final landscape plan in general conformance with the preliminary landscape plan prepared by the Sear-Brown Group, dated February 23, 2000 and revised March 15, 2000, revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Development of the building in general conformance with elevations prepared by Retail Arohiteeture dated February 21, 2000 and revised March 15, 2000. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. /~P \\VHxy0ZDEPT~OMD~LNO~ZBAXZBA ~000~,tEI MemosXZBA-07-2000 (CVS) mej memo.doe VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNER DATE: MARCH 17, 2000 HEARING DATE: MARCH 23, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-07-2000-1 E. RAND ROAD CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO PERMIT A 10,800 SQUARE FOOT DRUG STORE '6'ITI-I DRIVE-TttROUGH AND ASSOCIATED VARIATION BACKGROUND INFORMATION Petitioner: $ohn M. Wojtila, P.E. Zeremba Group, L.L.C. 14600 Detroit Avenue Lakewood, OH. 44107 Status of Petitioner: Contract Purchaser of the Preperty Parcel Number: 03-34-200-001 Lot Size: 2.07 acres Existing Zoning: B3 Community Commercial Existing ]Land Use: Vacant Retail Building Lot Coverage: 97% existing 74.7% proposed 75% maximum per B3 district Requested Action: Conditional Use Approval to Permit a 10,880 s.f. Drug Store with Drive-Through and 10,000 s.f. of additional retail space, with one associated Variation. BACKGROUND The subject proper~y is an existing 2.07 acre parcel eontaining a vacant commercial structure, located at the southeast eonaer of Kensington Road and Elmhurst Road. The applicant proposes to construct a 20,880 square foot retail structure to contain a 10,880 square foot C.V.S. Pharmacy and 10,000 square feet &additional retail space. The site would be served by 85 parking spaces. The petitioner is seeking to construct a drive through facility to serve the pharmacy. As illustrated on the attached site plan, the drive-through would be located on'the west side of the building and set back 30 feet from the exterior side property line. The drive-through facility requires approval of a Conditional Use. The site plan, as proposed, would require a Variation for a required, landscape setback.. To conduct its analysis, of the proposed Conditional Use and VariatiOn, staff reviewed the petitiOn6r's plat of survey' and site plan and visited the site. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of March 23, 2000 ZBA-07-2000 Page 2 ANALYSIS Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: North: B-3 Community Shopping District / Service Station, Randhurst Mall, Vacant Restaurant South: B-3 Community Shopping District / Taxi Company, Vacant, Auto Service Uses East: B-3 Community Shopping District / Vacant Restaurant West: R-1 Single Family Residential B-4 Business Retail & Service / Auto Sales Approval Process The subject site is in the B-3 Community Shopping District. "Drug Stores" are listed as Permitted Uses in the B-3 district. "Drive-through and drive in establishments" are listed as Conditional Uses in the B-3 district. The proposed drug store with drive-through will require a Conditional Use approval by the Village Board, following a public hearing and recommendation by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The site, as proposed, will also require a Variation to Zoning Code requirements for a required landscape setback. Comprehensive Plan Designation The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property for general commercial and office uses. The proposed drug store is an appropriate use within this designation. The Rand Road Corridor Study does not make specific recommendations regarding this parcel. In general, the plan calls for improvements in the visual appearance of commercial properties in the corridor. The Village is currently preparing design guidelines for its commercial corridors. The proposed site and landscape plans would make significant improvements to the site's perimeter landscaping. The adequacy of those improvements will be discussed later in this report. The subject property is also in the area considered for future development of the Rand/Elmhurst "Ring Road" system to alleviate congestion in the area. The properties directly to the south of the subject property are three 150-foot wide parcels that could accommodate one of the roadways that would make up the ring road system. Development of the "Ring Road" concept may require some minor modifications to the subject property. However, the proposal has been designed in such a manner to allow for a possible extension of the center if the "Ring Road" plan comes to fruition. Based on the above analysis, the proposed development is consistent with the Rand Road Corridor Plan. Structure and Elevations The proposed structure is a 20,880 s.f. retail building that would be constructed primarily of a brown brick. The elevations include a brick parapet and canopies. The canopies also include some small areas of E.I.F.S. The ZBA and Village Board both have long standing policies of requiring masonry construction for new buildings in the Village (Steak and Shake, Borders, Country Inns and Suites, Menard's, etc.). As the E.I.F.S. material is used only as an accent material in the sign band, the proposed structure meets the intent of the policy. Landscape Plan The applicant has submitted a .preliminary Landscape Plan for the property. The plan includes a minimum 14' landscape buffer adjacent.to all righSs-of-way. The buffer includes shrubs and trees along the west property line, but shrubs only along the north and east property line. Trees with a maximum 75? spacing must be added to those landscape areas. This item .can be addressed with the building permit submission. The 10' perimeter buffer on the south side of the property includes one shade tree, clusters of ornamental trees, and shrubs, Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of March 23, 2000 ZBA-07-2000 Page 3 The applicant has provided for interior parking lot landscaping well in excess of the minimum 5% requirement. Materials in those areas are primarily shade trees and sod. Foundation plantings are provided along the north, west, and east sides of the building. The north side planting of the building includes shade trees in landscape islands. The west side of the building is screened with a 5' landscape area containing shrubs. The fotmdation planting for the east side of the building consists of three triangular landscape areas containing shrubs and ornamental trees and shade trees in landscape islands. The Zoning Code requirement is a 10' area around all structures. However the Zoning Code Landscape Requirements allow for an administrative reduction of this requirement when the intent of the requirement is met. In this case, the applicant has provided for perimeter buffers exceeding code requirements in all areas, except for the proposed Variation and interior parking lot landscaping in excess of minimum requirements. The applicant has also provided materials in foundation planting areas in excess of minimum requirements. Based on those facts, the reduction of foundation planting width can be supported. No species are identified on the submitted preliminary landscape plans. Identification of proposed species will be required at the time of building permit submission. A final issue related to the landscape plan is the width of the perimeter landscape buffer at the north end of the site. The current proposal is a 12' wide area with an additional 2' in the form of sod in the 2' parking space overhang. Staff's review comments from the initial proposal required the applicant to add 6' to this area to allow for the maximum possible landscape area. This would require the elimination of two parking spaces. Instead, the applicant has provided a 6' (plus a 2' sod overhang) landscape island interior to the lot. Although the proposed island helps allow for better circulation on site, the ZBA is asked to consider making relocation of the 6' of landscaping to the perimeter a condition of approval. That would help the site meet the intent of the Village's upcoming Corridor Design Guidelines. Setbacks The proposed structure is set back at least 30 feet from all property lines and, therefore, meets all required building sethaeks. Parking lots in the B-3 District must be set back a minimum of 10' from any property line where the site is adjacent to non-residential property. The proposed parking lots meet the 10' setback requirements adjacent to non- residential property. A parking lot in the B-3 District must be set hack 30' where the lot abuts residential property. The site is adjacent to R-1 zoned properties, developed with single-family residences for the south 161 feet of the west property line. The proposed drive-through lane encroaches to between 15' and 24' from that property line and the applicant has requested a Variation for that item. Parking and Stacking Section 14.2224 lists a parking requirement for retail centers of less than 30,000 square feet as 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. As proposed, the site would consist of a 20,880 square foot re~'d structure, requiring 84 parking spaces. The proposal includes 85 parking spaces. The Zoning Code does not specify a minimum stacking requirement for pharmacy drive-through lanes, but requires 5 stacking spaces for bank drive-through windows. The proposal includes 6 stacking spaces for each of the two drive-through lane~. Thus, the site meets its requirements for parking spaces and stacking. The site has only one parking space in excess of the minimum requirement to accommodate uses with greater parking requirements. Thus, if the site is to accommodate restaurant uses, additional off-site parking must be obtained. The one-way flow of the south driveway will encourage cut-through traffic and appears to complicate mack access to the CVS loading area. Reversing the proposed direction of that access is recommended. The proposal includes addition of aright-in/right-out curb cut to the Elmhurst Road frontage of the site. The curb cut is necessary to allow for effective circulation of traffic from Elmhurst Road to the drive-through. Using only existing curb cuts, vehicles from Eimhurst Road would have to turn onto Kensington Road and Rand Road, complicating traffic problems at that intersection, to access the drive-through. Addition ofthe curb cut will require approval by I.D.O.T. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of March 23, 2000 ZBA-07-2000 Page 4 Note that the proposed development will be subject to all Development Code requirements. These requirements need not be addressed at this time, however, the fmal engineering plans cannot be approved, nor can a building permit be issued until all Development Code requirements are satisfied. REQUIRED FINDINGS Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: ~ The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; n The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the viciniW or impede the orderly development of those properties; r~ Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and n Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use contains a vacant commercial structure in poor condition, with insufficient parking for most commercial uses and minimal landscaping. The property is at an important intersection within an established commercial area. The applicant proposes to construct a new commercial structure that includes a drive-through on the parcel. The proposal would bring the property into compliance with all applicable zoning requirements, except for the one Variation item. The proposal will greatly improve the appearance of this comer, in terms of the structure and parking lot and especially in terms of landscaping. The proposed commercial structure and drive-through will be similar in intensity to the surrounding area and in compliance with the provisions of the Rand Road Corridor Plan. Based on the above, the proposal would have little or no negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets and would significantly improve the area's appearance. The proposal does add one new curb cut to Elmhurst Road, but that curb cut will be limited to right-in/right-out only. Thus, the proposal would have little negative impact on circulation in the area. The proposed Conditional Use will comply with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements, with the exception of the one proposed Variation. The essential character of the area - a sub-regional commercial center - would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. Variation Standards Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These standards relate to: ca A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; ca lack of desire to increase financial gain; and ca protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The applicant has requested a Variation for Zoning Code Section 14.2217.B, which requires a 30' landscape setback for the south 161' of the west.property line. The applicant'~ stated reasons for the proposed variation are related to the small area affected by Section 14.2217.B and its affect on the proposed site plan. The proposed buffei' contains all required landscape materials. Thus the 6' to 15' addition to the proposed landscape area would add only additional ount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of March 23, 2000 ZBA-07-2000 Page 5 sod area to the buffer and would require elimination of the proposed drive-through bypass lane. That change would negatively affect the efficiency of on-site circulation, while providing minimal benefit to adjacent residents. The petitioner also cites the unusual shape of the subject parcel to help support a finding of hardship for the proposed Variation. The proposal would not have a negative effect on the adjacent single-family residential area or on the public welfare. In fact, the proposal would replace an existing parking area with a minimal sethaek and no landscape improvements with a well-landscaped 15' to 24' wide buffer. Thus, the proposal would be likely to have a significant positive effect on the neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Conditional Use meets the required Conditional Use standards in Section 14.203.F.$ of the Zoning Ordinance and the Variation Standards Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board approval of the proposed Conditional Use and Variation to permit the establishment of a pharmacy with drive-through at 1 E. Rand Road, Case No. ZBA-07-2000, with the conditions listed below. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. The conditions of approval are: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by the Sear-Brown Group, dated February 10, 2000 and revised March 15, 2000 (Attachment 1). 2. Submission of a final landscape plan in general conformance with the preliminary landscape plan prepared by the Sear-Brown Group, dated February 23, 2000 and revised March 15, 2000, revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Development of the building in general conformance with elevations prepared by Retail Architecture dated February 21, 2000 and revised March 15, 2000. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. 7. Reverse the proposed direction of the one-way flow of the south driveway to discourage cut-through traffic. I concur: William J C~ney, ~CP,~D~cr c~f ~m~ity Development /JP H:~GEN~PLNG~ZBA~ZBA 2000~Staff Memos~ZBA-07.2000 (CVS).doe Mall Randh. urst Shopping Center Road Judith Highland Street Location Map Case No. ZBA 07.2000 CVS Condtional Use PreP~red By: Village of Mount Prospect Department of Community Development - Plan~in~,o Division March 10, 2000 s~. ELMHURST ROAD (S R 83) ..? t,~~ 128' ~' '"' ~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOIJNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-07-2000 Hearing Date: March 23, 2000 PETITIONER: John Wojtila, P.E. Zeremba Group, LLC 14600 Detroit Ave. Lakewood, OH 44107 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1 E. Rand Rd. PUBLICATION DATE: March 8, 2000 DAILY HERALD REQUEST: Conditional Use approval to permit construction of a 10,880 s.f. Drag Store with drive-through and associated Variation MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Leo Floros Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Arlene Juracek, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem STAFF MElVlBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: John Wojtila, P.E. ~:~ Camille Schofidd Susan Weems Steve Grabowski Vic Giovannini Bob Boles Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the February 24, 2000 meeting were approved with corrections. At 8:25, after hearing one case under Old Business and one case under New Business, Ms. Juracek introduced Case ZBA-07-2000, for CVS Pharmacies at 1 E. Rand Rd. Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development introduced the case, indicating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices, and through signage on the property. He indicated this request was for Conditional Use approval to permit a drag store with drive-through, with one associated Variation for the site. The subject property is about two acres in size, is located at the southeast comer of Kensington Road and Elmhurst Road, and contains a vacant commemiai structure (the former Heilig Meyers store). The applicant proposes to construct a 20,880 square foot retail structure to contain a 10,880 square foot C.V.S. Pharmacy and 10,000 square feet of additional retail space. The site would include 85 parking spaces. The drive-through facility on the west side of the building, which is set back 30 feet from the exterior side property line, Creates the need for a conditional use. Mr. Blue described how the subject site is in the B-3 Community Shopping District. "Drag stores" are listed as permitted uses in the B-3 district. "Drive-through and drive in establishments" are listed as Conditional Uses in th~ B-3 district. The proposed drug store with drive-through will require a Conditional Use approval by the Village Board. Also, a Variation is requested for a required landscape setback on the west side of the property. Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-07-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 Mr. Blue noted that the Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property for general commercial and office uses, and that the proposed drug store is an appropriate use within this designation. Also, that the Rand Road Corridor Study does not make specific recommendations regarding this parcel, but calls for improvements in the visual appearance of the corridor. Mr. Blue described how the Village is currently preparing design guidelines for its commercial corridors (including Rand and Route 83). The proposed development site is an excellent opportunity to apply the enhanced landscaping that is being contemplated. As with the first case heard this evening, the subject site is adjacent to a portion of the possible "Ring Road" system being considered by IDOT to relieve congestion at the Rand/ElmhursffKensington intersection. While the "Ring Road" could require minor modifications to the subject property, the site plan would be compatible with eventual development of the "Ring Road". Mr. Blue continued by describing the structure as a 20,880 s.f. retail building that would be constructed primarily of a brown brick and include a brick parapet and canopies. EIFS would be used as an accent in the sign bands, and the building would be consistent with the policy of requiring masonry construction for new commemial buildings in the Village. The preliminary landscape plan for the property was described as an important element of the proposal because of the site's location on two prime commemial corridors. Main characteristics of the site are that it includes a minimum of 14 feet of landscape area adjacent to all rights-of-way, a 10 foot perimeter on the south property line that includes shrubs and trees, and interior parking lot landscaping in excess of the five percent requirement. Two deficiencies with the landscape plan are that it does not include sufficient landscape materials along the north and east property line. Also, the foundation landscaping is not provided around the entire building. The lack of materials along the north and east can be addressed at time of building permit application. As for the foundation landscaping, enough landscaping material is provided along the building and in the parking lot that the intent of that requirement is met and can be approved administratively. A final landscape issue is possibly increasing the depth of the landscape area at the north end of the site. This comment was raised by staff during their initial review, and was aimed at creating the largest possible landscape area along Kensington for enhancement through the corridor design guidelines currently being developed. In redesigning the site, the applicant did not increase this area, but enlarged an interior landscape island in the north part of the lot. Mr. Blue noted that the comment was in the staff report for the ZBA's consideration, but was not intended as a condition of approval. Mr. Blue described the site as meeting required building setbacks. In addition, the parking lot meets all setback requirements - except one. Parking lots in the B-3 District must be set back 30' where the lot abuts residential property. The site is adjacent to residentially zoned and developed properties for the south 161 feet of the west property line. The proposed drive-through lane encroaches to between 15' and 24' from that property line and the applicant has requested a Variation for that item. The parking and stacking requirements from the zoning ordinance were described by Mr. Blue. He noted that four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area are required, and that the site would need 84 parking spaces for the 20,880 s.f. of building. Mr. Blue. added that, while the zoning ordinance does not specify a minimum stacking requirement for pharmacy drive-through lanes, 5 stacking spaces are required for bank drive-through windows. The proposa[includes six stacking spaces for each of the two drive-through lanes. Thus, the site meets its requirements for parking spaces and stacking. Regarding the on-site cimulation, it was noted that traffic flow in the one-way drive along the south side of the building should remain west to east. The staff report recommends changing the direction. However, additional information provided by the applicant and further review by staff indicates that the flow is appropriate as proposed and staff recommendation number seven (reversing the flow) should be deleted from the list of approval conditions. Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-07-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3 Regarding the Zoning Ordinance standards for Conditional Uses, which generally consider the impact on adjacent properties, Mr. Blue noted that the new stmcturc and landscaping would be an improvement for the site and surrounding area, that it was similar in intensity to the area, was in compliance with the Compmheusive Plan, and would have little or no impact on adjacent properties. As for the requested variation, Mr. Blue indicated that the petitioner noted the odd shape of the site as a part of the hardship request. He also noted that requiring the full 30' set back would not improve the buffer along adjacent residential uses, as the landscape area provided already includes adequate landscape materials. In addition, providing the full setback would negatively affect the on-site circulation. Based on that analysis, Mr. Blue presented the staff recommendation that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board approval of the proposed Conditional Use and Variation to permit the establishment of a pharmacy with drive-through at 1 E. Rand Road, Case No. ZBA-07-2000, with the conditions listed in the staff report, except for number 7, which would require reversing the direction of the south driveway. Richard Rogers asked if requests for signs at this location would be heard by the Sign Review Board. He said there were quite a few signs shown on the drawings that were not legal. Mr. Blue answered affirmatively. Mr. Youngquist asked if there had been any preliminary engineering concerning detention and how it would be handled. Mr. Blue said not yet, but those plans would need to be reviewed and approved. Mr. Youngquist asked if the driveway on Elmhurst Road in/out had received preliminary approval from IDOT. Mr. Blue said the Village had not contacted IDOT, and that the petitioner would need to answer that question. Ms. Juracek then asked if the petitioner wanted to speak. John Wojtila, Civil Engineer with the Zaremba Group in Lakewood, Ohio, developers of this and other CVS properties; Mr. Steve Grabowski, Traffic Engineer with Metro and Camille Shofidd, Sign Coordinator with Collins Signs, were sworn in. Mr. Wojtila pointed out there is currently very little landscaping on the site and the current building is 39% larger than the proposed building. He showed the Board new drawings of the drug store with a drive-through facility and retail space. He said the plan had been tweaked from the original submission and asked that the 6' strip be allowed in the proposed area and not up towards Kensington, as they would lose two parking spaces,. He showed several drawings and said the elevation was changed slightly from the original submission of three retail stores with a CVS Pharmacy. He explained CVS was proud to come to our area and he asked the Board's support in their endeavor. Regarding the six-foot deep landscape island in the parking lot, Mr. Blue indicated that would be acceptable if the area included landscaping and if the petitioner was willing to work with the Village to provide additional landscaping at the north end of the site. Mr. Wojtila said they would be willing to do that. Mr. Floros asked about the history of CVS stores. Mr. Wojtila said the firm's headquarters are in Rhode Island and most of the stores are east of the Mississippi, with most locations in New England, Ohio, and Michigan and the southeast; CVS has over 5,000 stores in the eastern side of the United States. When they purchased Revco Drugs, they started expanding through the eastern part of the United States. This is their first foray into the Chicago market. Ms. Juracek asked about detention at the site. Mr. Wojtila said, although final engineering is not complete, it is their intention to do underground detention2 Ms. Juracek this site and its close proximity to Border's would be a positive image for the area. She asked what type of tenants CVS was looking for; Mr. Wojtila said retail stores that would be cohesive with CVS Pharmacies. Mr. Blue pointed out a restaurant or other high-density business couldn't be accommodated because of parking limitations. Ms. Juracek asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak. Bob Boles came forward and explained he was the next door neighbor to the property. He said he had spoken with his other neighbor, the owners of the 303 Cab Co. and neither they nor he have ar~y objections to.th!s proposal. oning Board of Appeals ZBA-07-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 4 At 9:00, Ms. Juracek closed the public hearing to the audience and asked Board members for discussion. Mr. Floros asked the size of the present building on the site. Mr. Wojtila said it was 34,369 s.f. and the new building would be about 20,000 s.f. Ms. Juracek pointed out that would be less building and more landscaping at the site than at present. Mr. Youngquist said there are three existing curbcuts and the one additional curbeut would be key to the entire layout and has IDOT approved. Mr. Blue said staffhad not been in touch with IDOT but agreed the additional eurbcut was important. Mr. Rogers said the proposed building is far enough away from residences across the street, Rte. 83, to be no detriment to the neighbors and still be an improvement to the area. Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval to the Village Board for a Conditional Use and associated Variation to permit construction of a 10,800 s.f. drug store with drive-through and 10,000 s.f. of retail space with the six conditions listed in Staffs memo to the Board, with the elimination of Condition #7. Leo Floros seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 5-0. At 9:20 p.m., after one more case was heard under New Business, Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary Michael Blue Deputy Director of Community Development VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER' FROM: D CTOR OF CO TY DEWLO? NT DATE: MARCH 29, 2000 HEARING DATE: APRIL 4, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-04-2000- 305 E. KENSINGTON ROAD CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO PERMIT A 2,914 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH IN A B-3 COMMERCIAL SHOPPING DISTRICT JEFF MARTINEZ (PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT) The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use permit to allow the establishment of a fast food restaurant with a drive-through. The subject property is about 0.6 acres in size and will include a 2,914 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through and 32 parking spaces. The site is located directly east of the existing Loft Restaurant, and is part of a larger (1.5 acre) property being developed by the petitioner. The 0.83 acres south of the subject property will be developed as an overflow parking area for the Loft and the proposed restaurant. That portion meets all zoning requirements but will require a plat of subdivision. Staff's review and the ZBA's discussion included consideration of the potential "Ring Road" between Rand and Kensington Roads that would run immediately east of the site. While neither that potential "Ring Road" alignment nor the timing of the construction are certain, the road being located there is a possibility and was taken into consideration with the proposed site plan. The ZBA discussed the building materials for the restaurant, which is being constructed of concrete block, dyed red and gray (the building will be accented with green and white awnings and include a parapet wall to screen rooftop mechanical equipment). There was some consideration by the ZBA that a brick structure would be more appropriate. A motion to require brick construction failed by a vote of 3-2. At the conclusion of their consideration, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Conditional Use request to permit a fast food restaurant with drive through, ZBA 042000, at 305 E. Kensington Road with the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Kostak and Associates dated February 29, 2000 (Attachment 1). 2, Submission of a final landscape plan in general conformance with the preliminary site plan prepared by Kostak and Associates, dated February 29, 2000: a. revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning Ordinance b. revised to provide shade trees at a 50' spacing and a continuous landscape buffer a minimum of 3' in height along the east property line. 3. Development of the building in general conformance with elevations prepared by Kostak and Associates dated March 2, 2000. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requiremems. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. BA 04-2000 Conditional Use for a Restaurant with Drive though March 29, 2000 Page 2 7. Approval of a plat by the Plan Commission and recordation of that Plat of Subdivision for the subject property including the following items: a. cross-access/egress easements for all driveways crossing property lines b. a perpetual cross-parking agreement to provide a minimum of three parking spaces for use by the restaurant on Lot 2 in Lot 1 parking lots c. dedication of right of way along Kensington Road d. an easement for the sanitary service from the east lot crossing the west lot VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JEFF PEI~NS, PLANN~ DATE: MARCH 17, 2000 HEARING DATE: MARCH 23, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-04-2000 - 305 KENSINGTON ROAD CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO PERMIT A 2,914 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT YVlTI-I DRIVE-THROUGH BACKGROUND INFORMATION Petitioner: Jeff P. M~,rtinez Kensington Land Group Inc. 303 Kensington Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Status of Petitioner: Owner of the Property Parcel Number: 03-34-200-011 Lot Size: 26,755 square feet Existing Zoning: B3 Community Commercial Existing Land Use: Vacant Lot Coverage: 0% existing 32% proposed 75% maximum per B3 district Requested Action: Conditional Use approval to permit a 2,914 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through. BACKGROUND The subject property is an existing t.$ acre vacant parcel, located directly east of the existing Loi~ Restaurant (305 E. Kensington Road). The applicant proposes to subdivide the parcel into two separate parcels. The 0.83 acre rear parcel would be consolidated with the parcel containing the Loi~ and developed with additional parking for the restaurant and a drainage retention area. That parking lot will meet all zoning requirements and, therefore, does not require approval by the ZBA or Village Board. The front parcel (0.61 acres) would contain thc proposed fast food restaurant. A subdivision plat to split the parcel, consolidate the rear portion with the Lof~ property, and dedicate right-of-way for Kensington Road has not yet been received. Approval of a plat by the Plan Commission and recording of that Plat will be a condition of any approval for the subject property. ' The petitioner is seeking to constrUCt a 2,914' square fast food restaurant with a drive-through, 32 parking spaces, and associated lahdseape improvements on the parcel. As illustrated on the'attached site plan, the drivesthrough would be located on the east side of the building and set back 10 feet from the interior side property line. The site plan, as proposed, will not require Variations. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of March 23, 2000 ZBA4)4-2000 Page 3 Landscape Plan The applicant has submitted a preliminary Landscape Plan for the property. The plan includes a large sodded retention area at the south end of lot 2, a perimeter landscape area a minimum of 10' wide around all parking lots and the perimeter oftbe site. Approximately 30% oftbe proposed site is devoted to green space. Foundation plantings are not provided around the proposed structure, except at the front of the building. Article 23. requires a 10' foundation planting around the structure. Although this requirement may be reduced administratively, the intent of the code must be met. To do so in this case, the applicant must enhance the proposed foundation landscape areas. Addition of planter boxes in the sidewalk area to the west of the building, adding a foundation planting area near the drive-through, adding foundation plantings at the south end of the building, and adding landscape materials such as shrubs and annual beds to the noah of the building can be added to the proposal to meet the intent of this requirement. The size of the proposed perimeter and parking landscape areas meet code requirements. However, sufficient landscape materials to meet code requirements are not provided in those areas. Additional landscape materials are required in the perimeter buffers around the site. Per Zoning Code Section 14.2306.D, shrub and tree plantings a minimum of 3' in height must be provided across 50% oftbe entire site perimeter. Zoning Code Section 14.2308.B.1 also requires tree plantings at a maximum spacing of 75' around the entire site perimeter. The applicant recently illegally cleared the site of all existing trees. According to Zoning Code 14.2309.A, tree removal permits are required for removal of trees from vacant properties. That section also specifies that an approved site plan for a property serves as a tree removal permit for that property. Thus, this approval, and submittal of a landscape plan meeting the requirements of Article 23 would bring the site into compliance with tree preservation requirements. However, the large number of trees illegally cleared from the site warrants some remediation with this development. The east perimeter of the site is separated from residential properties by only 66' of vacant property. Therefore, the applicant should provide shade trees at a 50' spacing and a continuous landscape buffer a minimum of 3' in height along this property line to provide additional landscape materials and to bett6r buffer the residential area. Setbacks The proposed building is set back 55' from the Kensington Road right-of way and at least 24 feet from all other property lines. Therefore, the building meets all required setbacks. Parking lots in the B-3 District must be set back a minimum of 10' from any property line where the site abuts non-residential property. The proposed lots meet the I0' setback requirements adjacent to non-residential property. The site is not adjacent to any residential properties. Parking and Stacking Section 14.2224 lists a parking requirement for Fast-food Restaurants of 12 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, plus eight stacking spaces per drive-through window. As proposed, the site would consist of a 2,914 square foot fast-food restaurant, with a drive-through lane, requiring 35 parking spaces and eight stacking spaces. The proposal includes 32 parking spaces and eight stacking spaces. Thus, the site does not meet its requirement for parking spaces on-site. The existing and proposed parking lots on the parcel to the south and serving the Loft will have an excess of spaces for the Loft itself. The applicant proposes to provide the remainder of required parking for the site by obtaining a cross parking agreement to use in the parking lot to the south of the site. The applicant also proposed to provide cross- access between the .properties with the subdivision plat. Following recordation of a subdivision plat that includes cross-parking and cross-access agreements, the site will meet its parking requirement without a Variation. Review by Other Departments The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposals and noted the following Development Code requirements to be met for the site. These comments need not be resolve to approve the Conditional Use, but must be addressed with the building permit. submission fo/' the development. ount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Med.'ting of March 23, 2000 ZBA-04-2000 Page 5 provision or public streets in the area. The proposed Conditional Use will comply with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The essential character of the area - a sub-regional commercial center - would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Conditional Use will meet the Conditional Use standards in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance,' when the conditions of approval, listed below, have been met. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend approval of the proposed Conditional U. se to permit the establishment of a fast food restaurant with drive-through at 305 Kensington Road, Case No. ZBA-04-2000. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. The conditions of approval are: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Kostak and Associates dated February 29, 2000 (Attachment 1). 2. Submission ora final landscape plan in general conformance with the preliminary site plan prepared by Kostak and Associates, dated February 29, 2000: a. revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning Ordinance b. revised to provide shade trees at a 50' spacing and a continuous landscape buffer a minimum of 3' in height along the east property line. 3. Development of the building in general conformance with elevations prepared by Kostak and Associates dated March 2, 2000. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. 7. Approval of a plat by the Plan Commission and recordation of that Plat of Subdivision for the~ subject property including the following items: a. cross-access/egress easements for all driveways crossing property lines b. a perpetual cross-parking agreement to provide a minimum of three parking spaces for use by the restaurant on Lot 2 in Lot 1 parking lots c. dedication of right of way along Kensington Road d. an easement for the sanitary service from the east lot crossing the west lot W~i~i~J. 2y, AICP,~Dk o1~ of Community Development H :\G LeN~P LNG'~'B A'~'B A 200OStaff Memos',ZBA..O4-2000 (Km'tsington Fast Food).do~ II II1~'~11 PROPOSED NEW I~~ KOSTAK ASSOCIATES, ?.C >_,i ~,~ RESTAURANT ' ~,tl I r ::o,::.:.~.~,,~ MT. PROSPECT, [ 60056 . ' II I I I I '~' "''' ~" ~'" ' ' ~ ' PLANTING SCHEDULE SITE PLAN DATA LOT t LOT 2 MARK SPECIES SIZE IMPERVIOUS&REA 75% M.~X 57,366(67%) 18,727 (70%) PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN | .'"'~-~"~',. .., ~=, '~"'~'~'~' ;Ill ............... 1.~o~ SK-, PROPOSED RESTAURANT ME~TES OF TI-IE REGULAR MEETING OF THE, MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-04-2000 Hearing Date: March 23, 2000 PETITIONER: Jeff Martinez SUBJECT PROPERTY: 305 Kensington Rd. PUBLICATION DATE: February 9, 2000 DAILY HERALD REQUEST: Conditional Use for the establishment of a fast food restaurant with a drive- through MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Leo Floros Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Arlene Juracek, Chairperson 1VIEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Jeff Martinez Warren Kostak Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the February 24, 2000 meeting were approved with corrections. Ms. Juracek introduced Case ZBA-04-2000, which had been postponed from the meeting of February 24, 2000. Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development introduced the case, indicating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices, and through signage on the property. He indicated this was a Conditional Use request for a restaurant with a drive-through and that the subject property is about 0.6 acres in size and will include an approximately 2,900 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through and 32 parking spaces. The site is located directly east of the existing Loft Restaurant, and is part of a larger (1.5 acre) property being developed by the petitioner. The 0.83 acres south of the subject property will be developed as an overflow parking area for the Lot~ and the proposed restaurant. That portion meets all zoning requirements but will require a plat of subdivision. Mr. Blue identified the property as being located in the B-3 Commercial Shopping district, which requires that the restaurant is a eonditionai use due to the drive through. He also indicated that no variations are required by the petitioner. The property was described as being designated for general commercial/office use in the Comprehensive Plan, and it was noted that the proposed restaurant is in keeping with that designation. The Rand Road Plan, an element of the comprehensive plan, identified the possibility of a '"'Ring Road"" system to reduce traffic at the intersection of 83/Rand/Kensington. It was noted that one of the "Ring Road" options ran along the east edge of this site, and that while there are no near term plans for the "Ring Road" to be built, the proposed site plan took that possibility into account. The structure and elevation were described as being constructed of concrete block, dyed red and gray. The building is aeeanted with green and white' awnings, and includes a parapet wall to screen rooftop mechanical equiPment. Therefore, the building generally reflects the policy established by th~ Village Board and ZBA of reqUiring brick construction for conditional uses. Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-04-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 Mr. Blue indicated that the preliminary landscape plan included a minimum of 10 feet of landscaping around all parking lots and the perimeter of the site, and that about 30% of the site was devoted to green space. He also noted that additional landscape material would be required (per code) in the perimeter landscape areas and for foundation landscaping, and that these would be resolved in the building permit process. Additional landscape materials were also recommended for the east side of the building (which is closest to the residential uses). Regarding parking and stacking, the Zoning Ordinance requires 12 spaces per 1,000 square feet (35 for this case) and eight stacking spaces. The proposal includes the eight stacking spaces and 32 parking spaces. Additional parking will be available in the shared lot to the south, and will be secured with an access easement between the two properties. Therefore, the site meets its parking and stacking requirements. As for findings regarding the Conditional Use, Mr. Blue indicated that the proposal is similar in intensity to the surrounding area, complies with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance requirements, and would have little or no impact on the surrounding area. Therefore, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend approval of the proposed Conditional Use to permit the establishment of a fast food restaurant with drive-through at 305 Kensington Road, Case No. ZBA-04-2000 with the conditions listed in the staff report. He noted that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Richard Rogers asked if this was the property where all the trees had been recently removed. Mr. Blue said it was and indicated, that to remedy the loss of so many trees, additional landscaping would be required along the east side of the site. Mr. Floros asked if the petitioner was also the owner of the Loft Restaurant. Mr. Blue answered affirmatively. Merrill Cotten asked with whom the petitioner had a cross-access parking agreement? Mr. Blue said the easement was with the Loft Restaurant. Mr. Youngquist asked about detention for the property and the Loft property. Mr. Jeff Martinez, the owner of both properties, came forward to say the proposed detention would have the capacity to serve both locations. Warren Kostak, 55 E. Euclid, was sworn in and stated he was the architect for the project and would address any concerns for the Board. Ms. Juracek asked if the plans complied with MWRD and IDOT regulations. Mr. Kostak said they did. Mr. Rogers said he did not approve of the use of stained concrete block and asked if the petitioner would consider using brick instead. Mr. Kostak said they had chosen the concrete block because it was to be a casual fast-food restaurant and block would be an effective way to project that image to the clientele. Ms. Juracek asked if there were any questions from the audience. Being none, the Public Heating was closed at 7:52 and petition brought back to the Board. Ms. Juracek asked the Board if they wanted to make the use of brick another condition for approval of the request. Some members said if Code did not require brick, the Board should not, and some members said the brick would improve the appearance of the site, which had already been made less attractive by cutting down the trees. After discussion by the Board, Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend an additional condition that brick be used instead of stained concrete block in the construction of the restaurant. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Youngquist, Rogers NAYS: Cotten, Floro~; Juracek Motion failed 3-2. oning Board of Appeals ZBA-04-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3 Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for a Conditional Use for the establishment of a fast food restaurant with a drive-through with the seven conditions identified in Staffs memo to the Board. Leo Floros seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 5-0. At 9:20 p.m., at, er three cases were heard under New Business, Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. ~a~bara Swiatek, Planning Secretary Deputy Director of Community Development INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE: MARCH 22, 2000 SUBJECT: MARCH SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF PROSPECT AVENUE BETWEEN KENILWORTH AVENUE AND LANCASTER STREET The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to approve no parking any time along the north side of Prospect Avenue between Kenilworth Avenue and Lancaster Street. The Engineering Staff initiated the study of this issue. In 1999, Prospect Avenue noah of Central Road was reconstructed because of its poor condition. The asphalt roadway was widened from 15' to 20' and curb and gutter was added to the noah side of the street. An 8' wide asphalt bike path was also constructed as part of the project. The bike path connects to the sidewalk at the end of Prospect Avenue east of Lancaster Street and continues west along the noah side of Prospect Avenue to Melas Park. The bike path is located immediately behind the curb. Site visits were conducted during the weeks of February 14th and February 21st. Based on our observations, there were very few vehicles parked along Prospect Avenue. There appears to be adequate parking in the lots to not overcrowd the Village streets. 46 surveys were distributed to those residents that live along the south side of Prospect Avenue between Kenilworth and Lancaster. 14 surveys were returned to the Village. Of the 14 surveys we received, only 3 opposed the proposed parking restrictions. Many residents indicated that vehicles actually park on the bike path. Also, residents said restricting parking would not affect the ability to find parking as there are few vehicles that park on Prospect Avenue. The Engineering Staff supports the proposed parking restrictions for a number of reasons. First, when a vehicle is parked on the north side of the street, a person opening the passenger door will create an obstacle fora bicyclist or pedestrian. Second, we want to eliminate the potential for a vehicle to park on the bike path. Third, the narrow width of the roadway prevents two-way traffic if vehicles are parked on both sides of the street. Prohibiting parking on one side of the street will allow two-way traffic to be maintained. By a vote of 5-0, the Safety Commission recommends to approve no parking any time along the north side of Prospect Avenue between Kenilworth Avenue and Lancaster Street. Please include this item on the April 4th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting for your reference. cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:'~files'~ngin~r',t~at'fic",sat'~corm'n~r~cs&rnin'~narch0Orec-doc INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS .,.~.,. ' I' '"'~'"r~'"' FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE: MARCH 22, 2000 SUBJECT: MARCH SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LOUIS STREET OPPOSITE 214 N. LOUIS STREET The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to approve no parking any time on the east side of N. Louis Street from a point 425' to a point 433' north of the centerline of E. Thayer Street. Mr. Lenz, 214 N. Louis Street, expressed a concern with cars double-parking on the street opposite his driveway making it difficult to maneuver in and out of the driveway. He has asked the Police Department to ticket and tow these cars but was told there was not a restriction against parking for this area in the Village Code. The 200 block of N. Louis Street is an asphalt road with curb and gutter. Between 200 and 214 N. Louis the road is 25' wide. From 214 N. Louis north, the road is 31' wide, The road widens over an 8' stretch on the east side of the road opposite the driveway of 214 N. Louis. The area of the road where the widening occurs is striped with white paint indicating that parking is not allowed. Site visits were conducted during the weeks of February 14th and February 21st. Based on our observations, vehicles were parked on the east side of the street throughout the day. Most of the motorists appeared to patronize the hair salon. The parking hot on the hair salon's property was often full. At no time did we observe a vehicle parked over the striped area opposite 214 N. Louis. Surveys were sent to the homeowner at 214 N. Louis and also the business owner of the hair salon. Only the homeowner's survey was returned to the Village. The homeowner is in favor of the parking restriction. The Engineering Staff also supports the proposed parking restriction. We want to eliminate the potential of a vehicle double-parked on the street and making it difficult for the owner at 214 N. Louis Street to access his driveway. By a vote of 5-0, the Safety Commission recommends to approve no parking any time on the east side of N. Louis Street from a point 425' to a point 433' north of the centerline of E. Thayer Street. Please include this item on the April 4th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting for your reference. cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:~filcs~cnginecr~afficL~afccomm~recsSmlln~marchOOrcc.doc Mount' Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 TDD 847/392-1235 MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION DRAFT CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, March 13, 2000. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Lee Beening Chairman Andy Mitchell Commissioner Ted Adamczyk Police Department Buz Livingston Fire Department Paul Bures Public Works Matt Lawrie Public Works/Engineering Division Absent: Chuck Bencic Commissioner Nancy Bobikewicz Commissioner Joan Bjork Commissioner Phyllis Moliere Commissioner Others in Attendance: See Attached List. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Mr. Bures, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Safety Commission held on December 13, 1999. The minutes were approved by a vote of 5-0. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD No citizens came forth at this time to discuss any topics that were not on the current agenda. OLD BUSINESS No old business was discussed. I Recycled Paper- Printed w~n Soy Ink NEW BUSINESS A) REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LOUIS STREET OPPOSITE 214 N. LOUIS STREET 1) Background Information Resident Comments: Mr. Lenz expressed a concern with car~ double-parking on the street opposite his driveway making it difficult to maneuver in and out o£the driveway. He has asked the Police Department to ticket and tow these ears but was told there was no ordinance in the Village Code restricting parking. Staff Observations: a) The 200 block of N. Louis Street is an asphalt road with curb and gutter. Between 200 and 214 N. Louis the road is 25' wide. From 214 N. Louis north, the road is 31' wide. The road widens over approximately a 10' stretch on the east side of the road opposite the driveway of 214 N. Louis. The area of the road where the widening occurs is s~riped with white paint indicating that parking is not allowed. b) The portion of lq. Louis Street involved in this study is in a residential area. A hair salon is at the corner of Louis and Rand and a piece o£ vacant property is on the east side of the street, q~e driveway to the hair salon is off of Rand. Along the west side o£ the street are single family homes. c) Village Code currently prohibits parking on the west side of the 200 block o£ N. Louis street any time. Parking is prohibited on the east side of the street only between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. d) Site visits were conducted during the weeks of Fehruary 14~ and February 21s~. Based on our observations, vehicles were parked on the east side of the street near the hair salon throughout most of the day. Most of the motorists appeared to patronize the hair salon. The parking lot on the hair salon's property was often full. At no time did we observe a vehicle parked over the striped area opposite 214 N. Louis. e) Surveys were sent to the homeowner at 214 lq. Louis and also the business owner o£ the hair salon. The homeowner's survey was returned to the Village. The question that was asked in the su~ey was, What insight can you p~'ovide or experiences can you share that ~,ould support or oppose the proposed parl~ing restriction? The homeowner is in favor of the proposed parking restriction. The business owner did not return the survey. Staff Recommendation: The Engineering Staff supports the proposed parking restriction. We want to eliminate the potential of a vehicle double-parked on the street making it difficult for the owner at 214 N. Louis Street to access his driveway. Based on Staff observations, the Village Traffic Engineer recommends: Approval of no parking any time on the east side of N. Louis Street from a point 425' to a point 433' north of the centerline of E. Thayer Street. 2) Discussion Chris Lenz, 214 N. Louis Street, explained that vehicles are often parked opposite his driveway because of the hair salon business. Vehicles occasionally double-park and also park on the grass. Mr. Lenz has asked the Police Department to ticket these double-parked vehicles but since there is no ordinance, they will not issue tickets. Mr. Lenz is requesting an ordinance so that a sign can be installed prohibiting parking opposite his driveway. Commissioner Beening stated the street was xvidened to provide on-street parking for the hair salon patrons while trying to keep the residents happy. Traffic Engineer Lawrie presented the findings of the traffic study and his recommendations to the Commission. He also explained that when the vacant property is developed, the street will be widened to the same width as in front of the hair salon. The Village currently doesn't have the full right-of-way and was unable to widen the street in front of the vacant property during the road reconstruction project a few years ago. No further discussion took place on this issue. Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Officer Adamezyk, moved to approve no parking any time on the east side of N. Louis Street from a point 425' to a point 433' north of the centerline of E. Thayer Street. The motion was approved by a vote of 5-0. B) REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF PROSPECT AVENUE BETWEEN KENILWORTH AVENUE AND LANCASTER STREET 1) Staff Observations: a) In 1999, Prospect Avenue north of Central Road was reconstructed because of its poor condition. The asphalt roadway was widened from 15' to 20' and curb and gutter was added to the north side of the street. An 8' wide asphalt bike path was also constructed as part of the project. The bike path connects to the sidewalk at the end of Prospect Avenue east of Lancaster Street and continues west along the north side of Prospect Avenue to Melas Park. The bike path is located immediately behind the curb. b) The portion of Prospect Avenue involved in this study is in a residential area.. No buildings are on the north side of the street. The railroad tracks are approximately 100' north of the street. Apartments and other multiple housing units exist on the south side of the street. c) On-site p~trking for residents of the apartments is provided on the south side of the buildings. Parking is also currently allowed on most of the surrounding Village streets except during the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. Parking is not allowed any time on both sides of Prospect Avenue east of Lancaster Street. d) Site visits were conducted during the weeks of February 14~ and February 21s~. Based on our observations, there were very few vehicles ever parked along Prospect Avenue. There appears to be adequate parking in the lots to not overcrowd the Village streets. e) 46 surveys were distributed to those residents that live along the south side of Prospect Avenue between Kenilworth and Lancaster. 14 surveys were returned to the Village. The question that was asked in the survey was, What insight can you provide or experiences can you share that would support or oppose the proposed parking restriction? Of the 14 surveys we received, only 3 opposed the proposed parking restrictions. Many residents indicated that vehicles actually park on the bike path. Also, residents said restricting parking would not affect the abilit~ to find parking as there are few vehicles that park on Prospect Avenue. Staff Recommendation: The Engineering Staff supports the proposed parking restrictions for a number of reasons. First, when a vehicle is parked on the north side of the street, a person opening the passenger door will create an obstacle for a bicyclist or pedestrian. Second, we want to eliminate the potential for a vehicle to park on the bike path. Third, the narrow width of the roadway prevents two-way traffic if vehicles are parked on both sides of the street. Prohibiting parking on one side of the street will allow two-way traffic to be maintained. Based on Staff observations, the Village Traffic Engineer recommends: Approval of no parking any time along the north side of Prospect Avenue between Kenilworth Avenue and Lancaster Street. 2) Discussion Commissioner Beening noted that no one lives on the north side of Prospect Avenue. Also. he understands how a vehicle door could conflict with pedestrians on the bike path. Traffic Engineer Lawrie noted that many of the comments from the residents indicated that vehicles park on the bike path. Commissioner Beening inquired where the bike path extends to. Traffic Engineer Lawrie explained that the bike path continues throughout Melas Park to the west. To the east, the bike path connects to a sidewalk that continues to the Park District building on Central Road. Also. there is talk that Arlington Heights may build a bike path and connect to ours in Melas Park. No further discussion took place on this issue. Mr. Bures, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell, moved to approve no parking any time along the north side of Prospect Avenue between Kenilworth Avenue and Lancaster Street. The motion was approved by a vote of 5-0. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 5-0 to adjourn at 7:55 p.m. upon the motion of Commissioner Beening. Mr. Bures seconded the motion. Respectfully submitted, Traffic Engineer x:\files~engineerXsafecomm\trafficXrecs&min\march00min.doc VILLAI~E OF MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING ATTENDANCE SHEET March '13, 2000 '/:30 P.M. NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM tr~ cr~ u~a TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & BUILDINGS DATE: MARCH 30, 2000 SUBJECT: SEALED BID RESULTS CONCRETE RESTORATIONS 2000 BACKGROUND Throughout the year, concrete restoration to driveways, curbs, and sidewalks are necessary due to damage as a result of water main breaks, and storm and sanitary sewer repairs. In the past we would prepare alist of locations 3-4 times a year, request quotes from qualified contractors and than issue a purchase order for the replacements. What we are proposing this year is to bid one contract for the entire year, this would allow us to do replacements more frequently, thus reducing the time our residents are waiting for restorations. BID RESULTS Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 A.M. on March 21, 2000 for proposed concrete restoration contract. Bid prices were based on estimated quantities of approximate footage and unit prices. Eleven invitational bids were mailed, and a bid notice was placed in local papers. . · Three bids were received, and bid results are as follows: Bidder Bid Price G & M Inc. $ 53,425.00 Globe Construction, Inc. 63,400.00 Schroeder & Schroeder Inc. 91,100.00 Unfortunately, in the bid there was an error in the quantity of square yards of concrete street restoration by a factor often. Following are the adjusted bid results based on that reduction. Bidder Bid Price G & M Inc. $ 14,770.00 Globe Construction, Inc. 18,400.00 Schroeder & Schroeder Inc. 23,600.00 . X:\USERS~PBURES\WORD\STREET~CONC2000RES.doc I Page two Bid Results Concrete Restorations 2000 March 30, 2000 DISCUSSION The low bidder G & M Inc. supplied four references; all, which said he has done excellent work and two, will be usIng him again. Based on last years-total restoration requirements, totals for the contract will be adjusted for an amount not to exceed $20,000.00. The contractor has already been notified about the expected quantity adjustments and has agreed to hold the same unit costs with the reduction. Funds for this proposed contract are In several restoration accounts in the current budget (dependent on which department requires the need for restoration). · on page 248, account code 6105505-540700, in the amount of $41,100.00 on page 248, account code 6105505-540470, in the amount of $17, I50.00 · on page 249, account code 6105506-540470, in the amount of $10,700.00 · on page 251, account code 6105509-540470, in the amount orS 3,400.00 RECOMMENDATION I recommend acceptance of the lowest bid as submitted by G & M Inc. for a concrete restoration contract for an amount not to exceed $20,000.00. Paul Bures Superintendent of Streets & Buildings Gl~'n R. An/dler Director of Public Works Pb c: Director of Public Works Glen R. Andler Deputy Director of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey file X:\U SERS~PBURES\WORD\STREET\CONC2000RES.doc 2 Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER DATE: MARCH 28, 2000 SUBJECT: ROUTE 83 STREETLIGHTS Backoround The Village requested that IDOT include construction of streetlights along the full length of the Route 83 improvements between Golf Road and Prospect Avenue. IDOT agreed, and the plans were initiated. Under this scenario, the Village was responsible for 100% of the cost for the engineering and construction of the lights. Funding is included in the 2000 budget for this project in the amount of $595,000 for Residential Street Lights. Staff then became aware of and applied for federal funding through the Surface Transportation Program (STP). Through this program, federal funds will cover 70% of the project cost and the Village will be responsible for the remaining 30%. The Northwest Municipal Conference approved STP funding for this project prior to IDOT's Route 83 project going out for bids. Subsequently, the Village requested that the streetlights be pulled from IDOT's plans and IDOT complied. Discussion The Village is now in the position to obtain a design consultant to complete the lighting plans and specifications and to go out for bids. Staff learned that KAM Engineering, Inc. was involved in the lighting design for IDOT's Route 83 project. Since KAM Engineering, Inc. is most familiar with the project, staff requested a proposal from KAM for the completion of design engineering through the bidding process. KAM's proposal was in the amount not to exceed $41,588. KAM's proposal represents engineering costs at 7.23% of the project costs. Typical cost for this phase of engineering is up to 10% of the project cost. Recommendation It is important that this project is completed this year to coincide with the Route 83 construction. Because of KAM's prior involvement in the project and their ability to resume work and complete the project design within the shortest period of time, it is my recommendation that the proposal submi~ed by KAM Engineering, Inc. for the design of the Route 83 Street Light Improvements be accepted at the April 4, 2000 Village Board meeting with a not to exceed amount of $ 41,588. X:\files\engineer\projects\stlight\Rt83\engrecmm Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE: MARCH 28, 2000 SUBJECT: 2000 MATERIAL TESTING Background On Monday, March 27, 2000, we received eleven proposals to complete the material testing for the 2000 Street Resurfacing and Reconstruction Programs. The proposals included: * Testing the concrete material for the new curbs and driveways. Testing the asphalt binder and surface mix material at the asphalt plant and the asphalt placed on the pavement. Discussion All of the proposals fulfilled the above requirements. The proposals also supplied references of past work and qualifications of the personnel who will be evaluating the material samples. Listed below are the consultants and their proposed cost to provide the required services: Professional Services Industries (PSI) $59,580.00 Great Lakes Soil & Environmental $66,235.00 Design Consulting Engineers $67,500.00 Material Tesfmg Laboratories $67,730.00 O'Bden & Associates $73,575.00 STS Consultants $75,545.00 Soil & Material Consultants $76,060.00 Midwest Engineering Services $77,450.00 Applied GeoScience Inc. $79,225.00 SEECO Consultants $81,650.00 TSC $93,840.00 Engineer's Estimate $56,300.00 age 2 2000 Material Testing March 28, 2000 Qualification of Professional Services Industries, Inc. PSI has previously performed testing for the Village including the 1997 and 1999 Material Testing Program and their work has been acceptable. Recommendatior~ The proposal of PSI is $2,580 over the Village budget figure. The proposal is based on an approximate estimate of work that is to be performed. The quantities listed in the proposal are estimated quantities based on averages from previous years and prorated for the anticipated work for this year. However, many factors can influence the actual work needed for material testing. I have discussed the budget figure with John Lindsey, the District Manager for PSI and he has agreed that all of the necessary testing can be completed within the limits of the budget and that they will complete the contract for an amount not to exceed $57,000. With this understanding, I recommend that PSI be awarded the contract for the 2000 Material Testing Program in the amount not to exceed $57,000. This work will be funded with the budget account listed below and as shown on page 288 of the 2000 Budget Book: Account Code Amount 0507706-540545 $57,000.00 (.~I Michalik I concur with the above recommendation · ~ks Director X:~ILESkENOINEER\TESTINO',20OOUVlEMO_J'AN.DOC MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E. lanonis TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK TimothyJ. Corcoran Viii g f M P p PaulWm. Hoefert a e o ount ros ectVelmaLowe Richard M. Lohrstoffcr DennisG. Prikkel Community Development Department Pho.¢: 847,92~ooo Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/392-6022 Irvana K. Wilks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD: 847f3924064 AGENDA MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TI1V[E: 2nd Floor Conference Room Wednesday Village Hall April 5, 2000 · 100 South Emerson Street 7:30 p.m. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Mamh 15, 2000 IV. SUBDIVISIONS None V. OLD BUSINESS None VI. NEW BUSINESS A. PC-08-99/Development at Rand & Kensington (1 W. Rand Road) Exception .to Sec. 16.405.F.1 Detention Requirements to locate storm water detention facility closer than 25 feet from building to be occupied. B. Plan Commission Training Workshop VII. COMMENTS/OTHER BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development D~partment. at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056,.847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD g847-392-6064. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION March 15, 2000 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael Zadel at 7:30 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. ROLL CALL: Present upon Roll Call: Micha61 Zadel, Chairman Gary Grouwinkel Edwin Janus William Reddy Carol Tortorello Absent: Antoinette Astreides Frank Boege Louis Velasco Village StaffPresent: Judy Connolly, AICP, Planner Chuck Lindelof, P.E., Project Engineer Others in Attendance: Robert Bush Ed Dowling Tom George Mark Lattner Janice Stone Gerry Stone Ben Trapani Nancy Uxa APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Chairman Zadel opened the meeting and asked for comments on minutes from March 1, 2000. As there were none, Bill Reddy moved to approve the minutes and Carol Tortorello seconded the motion. The motioned carried 5-0. SUBDMSIONS: NONE OLD BUSINESS: Development Code Exceptions - St. Raymond's Parish/301 S. I-Oka Chairman Zadel asked Judy Connolly to recap the events for the previous meeting and summarize the petitioner's request. Ms. Connolly said that St. Raymond's Parish is in the process of expanding its facility and has to meet current code requirements. She said the petitioner appeared · before the Plan Commission at the March 1 meeting, seeking relief from Development Code requirements for storm water detenti6n and streetlight installation and the ease was continued to this meeting. MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Minutes of March 15, 2000 Meeting Page 2 Ms. Connolly said that St. Raymond's is required to provide detention for the whole site because the proposed addition is a new development, per Development Code requirements. The petitioner proposes to provide storm water detention for the new structures only and would like to modify the parking lot along Elmhurst Road/Route 83 so the parking lot will store water on-site. She said that Engineering reviewed the request and found that the design would not increase the amount of discharge into the combined sewers. Ms. Connolly said that the case was continued until the petitioner's engineer could document that the I-Oka Ave. sewer was able to handle additional run- off generated from the new impervious surface. She said that JKL, the petitioner's engineering firm, submitted calculations to staff last week and that the Engineering Division reviewed the petitioner's request, including the information from JKL, and continues to find that the development will not create flooding problems for the neighboring properties. Ms. Connolly presented the petitioner's second request from the Development Code, to not install the required streetlights. She said that the existing streetlights are on CornEd poles and on the petitioner's property. Ms. Connolly said that according to the Development Code, the existing ComEd lights would be replaced with aluminum standard poles and would be placed at the intersections and mid-block where necessary. Ms. Connolly said that the current lighting sources were on private property or owned by CornEd and that the Village could not guarantee that the light source would always be available. Although the existing lighting is consistent with the amount of lighting in the neighborhood, the source does not meet Development Code standards. She said that the petitioner feels that there is sufficient lighting at the site now and does not want to install new lights. She said that the petitioner's request does not meet the standards for a hardship and that granting the exception would he inconsistent with previous Village policy when other petitioner's sought relief from this requirement. Therefore, staff recommends denial of the petitioner's request for an exception to Development Code requirements for streetlights. At a minimum, the petitioner could record a covenant agreeing to pay for the installation and fixtures if the Village determines that streetlights are necessary. Ms. Connolly said that the project also presents the Village with an opportunity to incorporate corridor improvements along Elmhurst Road/Rt. 83. The improvements could be a combination of landscaping and new fencing to screen the parking lot and enhance the Rt. 83 corridor. She said a landscape easement along the east side of the parking lot was not required for approval of the storm water detention exception request but that the request would be in keeping with the proposed Corridor Guidelines. She said that providing detention only for the new impervious surface would be consistent with previous projects that included expansion of an existing facility. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the petitioner's request for an exception to the Development Code's storm water detention requirements and recommends that the petitioner work with the Village to arrive at a parking lot design/screening that enhances Elmhurst Road/Rt. 83 in a manner that is consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines. Ms. Connolly said that representatives from St. Raymond's were in the audience to answer Plan Commission's questions and.that Chuck Lindelofofthe Village Engineering Division was also in attendance if the Plan Commission had questions about the storm water detention design. Chairman Zadel asked if the Plan Commission members had any questions. There 'was discussion that the additional information about the sewer capacity was very thorough and useful. The consensus was that the calculations documented the minimal impacts of the project and provided the Village with more than adequate "leeway" to approve the Development Code exception for drainage. OUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Minutes of March 15, 2000 Meeting Page 3 There was discussion about the amount of space available to screen the parking lot and the location of the landscaping on private property. Ben Trapani said that the petitioner supports screening the parking lot and is agreeable to working with the Village to create a corridor enhancement for the area along Elmhurst Road/Rt. 83. Bill Reddy moved to approve the exception to the Development Code and have the petitioner provide storm water detention for the new impervious surfaces only. Carol Tortorello seconded the motion and the motion carried 5-0. Bill Keddy moved to deny the Development Code exception to not install the required streetlights and have the petitioner record a covenant to pay for the installation of new street lights if the Village determines the lighting is necessary. 'Carol Tortorello seconded the motion and the motion carried 5-0. Bill Keddy moved to approve that the petitioner work with the Village to arrive at a parking lot design using landscape screening that enhances Elmhurst Road/Rt. 83 in a manner that is consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines. Ed Janus seconded the motion and the motion carried 5-0. NEW BUSINESS: NONE COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS: Village Hall Ad hoe Committee Chairman Zadel said that the Mayor requested a representative from the Plan Commission to participate in the new Village Hall study. There was discussion about a comprehensive municipal facility and how the building would benefit various community groups. Plan Commission presented their expectations of a new facility in comparison to the existing Village Hall and Bank 1 building. Chairman Zadel explained that he was very familiar with and knowledgeable about the structure of the existing Village Hall because of his former position at Public Works. Chairman Zadel said that he worked on the Village Hall plumbing in addition to maintaining other facets of the building. He said that it was apparent even when the Village first occupied the structure that the building required significant improvement. Carol Tortorello moved that Chairman Zadel represent the Plan Commission on the Village Hall Ad Hoe Committee. Bill Reddy seconded the motion and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Reddy requested that Ms. Tortorello be the alternate representative if Chairman Zadel was unable to attend a meeting. Ed Janus requested that the Plan Commission receive notification of the ad hoe meetings because the other members may want to attend the meetings. The Plan Commission agreed with both suggestions and discussed the progress of the downtown redevelopment. Bill Reddy moved to adjourn the meeting and Ed Janus seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. MAYOR Gerald L. Farley VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis TRUSTEES Timothy J. Cor¢oranpaulWm. Ho,fcrt Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE CLERKveiraa Lowe Richard M. Lohrstorfer Community Development Department Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/81S-5329 Irvana K. Wilks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD: 847/392-6064 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME: 2nd Floor Conference Room Thursday Village Hall April 6, 2000 100 South Emerson Street 8:00 a.m. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - February 3, 2000 meeting IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Development UPdate V. NEW BUSINESS A. Finalize EDC Goals for FY2000 B. EDC Link on Village HomePage and other Internet Options C. Formalize Retention Program VI. CHAIRMAN'S 'REPORT VII. ADJOURNMENT An}; individflal who.would like to.attend thi~ meeting, but because'of.a disabiliqr ne~ds some accomm0d, ation '-"- to parficipate, lshould co.fitl~t the .Commnnt~ Developm~n~ Department- at. lO0 S.,Emerson, Moun~ Prospect,' IL 600~, 84%392-6000, Fat.- .q~28~ TDD g847-392-60~4. MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 2nd Floor Conference Room, Village Hall Thursday, February 3, 2000 8:00 a.m. The meeting of the Economic Development Commission (EDC) of the Village of Mount Prospect was held on Thursday, February 3, 2000 in the second floor conference room of Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. CALL TO ORDER .. Commissioner Ben Trapani called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. Commissioners John Amdt, Pat Biedar, Bmee Gillilan, and David Lindgren were present. Chairman Norm Kurtz was absent. Also present were Mayor Gerald Farley, William J. Cooney, Director of Community Development, Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development and Kevin Davies, Randhurst General Manager. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Amdt moved to approve the minutes of the November 4, 1999 meeting. Mr. Lindgren seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. OLD BUSINESS Development Update Mr. Cooney provided a brief update of economic activity in the Village. He reviewed the status of the NW Electric, Menards, Heilig-Meyer, Country Inns and Suites and various downtown projects. He asked that Mr. Davies provide an overview of the current projects at Randhurst. Mr. Davies indicated that he is close to completing a deal to fill the former East Side Marios build/ng with another restaurant user: He indicated that the success of the Border,s store had renewed interest at that comer for a restaurant. The Commission discussed condition of the Center and the need for reinvestment to occur. NEW BUSINESS 1999 Annual Economic Development Commission Report Discussion and Goals - 2000 Mr. Cooney indicated that he had e-mailed a draft version of the Annual Report to the Commission and asked for any comments on the document. Comrmssioners stated that the document looked good and made some minor adjustments to the text. The Commission discussed at length what they felt they could do over the next year to .' improve the business environment in the Village. Mr. Lindgren stated that he felt that the Commission should focus its efforts on the Phase 1V of downtown development now that the other phases were underway. In addition, he felt that the Commission needed to step up the Retention Program and that all commission members - . should participatc in that program. ThecomrmssiondiscussedthemeritsofexpandmgtheRetentionProgram and it was agreed that this matter would bo further discussed at the next meeting. Mr. Gillilan stated that he felt :.... .that the Conimi~sion should work on improving the relationship between residents and the business commtmity · and'that, th~ Village shouldlook'at putting ih plac~ som~ inceativ~ for smsll, staxt-llp bi~sh~ssl~s, lq{s. Biedar Economic Development Commission Minutes Page 2 stated that the Commission should focus its efforts on improving the overall condition of the south side of the Village and help mitigate the impact that the Route 83 construction project will have on local businesses. Mr. Amdt stated that the Commission should focus on improving the marketing of the Village through the use of new technology such as the Intemet. It was agreed that the comrmssion should narrow its focus to a few key issues and that this should be their goal at the April meeting. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT There was no Chairman's report. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Lindgren moved to adjourn the meeting Mr. Amdt seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, William J. Cooney, Jr., AICP Director of Community Development 2-0O MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E. Janonis TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK Timothy J. Corcoran V¢lma Lowe Paul Wm. Hoefer~ R, h dM. Lo torfer Village of Mount Prospect Dennis G. Prikkel Phone: 847/818-5328 Michaele W, Skowron Fax: 847/818-5329 ~r~a K. Wi~ks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD: 847/392-6064 NOTICE THE MONDAY, APRIL 3, MEETING OF TIlE SIGN REVIEW BOARD HAS BEEN CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING. Dated this 30th day of March, 2000. Village E,~gi.e er ~~~ Fo restry/Gr0unds Supe rinte ndent Mount. Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospest, Illinois 60056-~229 phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 TOO 847/392-1235 N OTIO E THE APRIL 10, ;7-080 MEETING OF THE SAFETY r't-OMMISBIDN HAS BEEN CANCELLED. THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING IS C~CHEDULED FOR MONDAY, MAY 8, 2000 AT '7-' 3 D P.M. AM AGENDA DR CANCELLATION NOTICE Will BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING, Recycled P~per - Printed with Soy Ink MAYOR Gerald L. Farley ~'~ TRUSTEES TimQthy J, Corcoran Phone: (847) 392-6000 Paul Wm. Hoefert Fax: (847) 392-6022 Richard M, Lohrstorfer TDD: (847) 392-6064 Dennis G. Prikkel Michaele W. Skowron Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Mic,a,,E.,anoni, Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE CLERK VelmaW. Lowe 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Mt. Prospect Youth Commission Agenda April 5,200O 7:00 Public Safety Building 1st Floor Training Room I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Minutes IV. Announcements A. Welcome to Guests B. Next Meeting V. Committee Reports A. Shirt Committee 1. Logo 2. Type B. Youth Forum Committee VI. Old Business A. Youthview B. Planting Flowers C. Table--Banner D. Youth in Government Day E. Survey F. Planning Session VII. New Business VIII. Adjournment