Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. New Business 07/15/2014Village of Mount Prospect Mtncnrospea- Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE, 27, 2014 SUBJECT: PZ -17- 1411750 W. CENTRAL RD.1 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS The Petitioner intends to renovate the interior of the existing building and add two stories to the center section of the existing building for an 83,998 square foot self - storage facility consisting of 687- units. Since the Zoning Ordinance does. not specifically address self- storage facilities, the Petitioner is seeking to amend Sections 14.604, 14.2401, and 14.2224 of the Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 14 of the Village Code). The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, June 26, 2014, and by a vote of 7 -0, recommended approval of the following code amendments: 1) Section 14.604: Land Use Table 2 — To add Mini - Warehouse as a permitted use in both the 1 -1 and 1 -3 zoning districts. 2) Section 14.2224: Off Street Parking Requirements — To add Mini - Warehouse to the industrial section of the table with a parking requirement of 0.14 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, plus 1 space per vehicle used in the conduct of the business (Office space calculated separately). 3) Section 14.2401: Definitions — To add Mini - warehouse with the following definition: a. A storage or warehousing service within a building for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise elsewhere. But in no case may storage spaces in a mini- warehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale, business, or service use. Spaces may not be used for workshops, hobby shops, manufacturing, or similar uses. Human occupancy is limited to that required to transport, arrange and maintain stored materials." Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Revised plans are also attached. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their July 15, 2014 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions, related to this matter. ;1 -1 VVV William J. Cooney, Jr. AICP X \Vflkvhl hedS1PLANTianning do Zoning 00W"&-Z 2014VAFJ MemosNZ -17 -14 1750W. Cemml Rd. (Zoning Ta%t Amcndments).d= Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department LOCATION: PETITIONER: OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: CASE SUMMARY — PZ -17 -14 1750 W. Central Road Morgan Group Inc. Dasom Community Church 03 -33- 300 - 072 -0000 1.38 acres (59,997.47 square feet) I -1 Limited Industrial Vacant Office /Warehouse Building 1�l REQUEST: Chapter 14 Zoning Text Amendments: • Section 14.604 Land Use Table — List Residential Storage Warehouse • Section 14.2401 Definitions — Define Residential Storage Warehouse • Section 14.2224 Parking Regulations — Provide parking requirement for Residential Storage Warehouse LOCATION MAP r _ J Lr 4 Rr I t I ,a MM= Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM w� FROM: DATE: HEARING D? TE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER JUNE 16, 2014 JUNE '26, 2014 Ic Kin[ Prcn ix-,t t PZ -17 -14 /1750 W. CENTRAL ROAD / ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS A public hearing has been scheduled for the June 26, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Morgan Group Inc. (the "Petitioner ") regarding the property located at 1750 W. Central Road (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking zoning text amendments for a residential storage warehouse land use. The P &Z hearing was properly noticed in the June 11, 2014 edition of the Daily Herald Newspaper. In addition, the Petitioner has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and Staff posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the north side of Central Road, and is directly west of the Village Public Works building. The Subject Property contains an existing one and two -story office /warehouse building with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned I1 Limited Industrial and is bordered to the west, north, and east by the II District, and to the south by multi- family in Arlington Heights. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner intends to renovate the interior of the existing building and add two stories to the center section of the existing building for an 83,998 square foot, 687 -unit, Residential Storage Warehouse, which would be a self - storage facility. Since the Zoning Ordinance does not specifically address self - storage facilities, the Petitioner is seeking to amend Sections 14.604, 14.2401, and 14.2224 of the Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 14 of the Village Code) as discussed below: Section 14.604: Land Use Table 2 The land use table for commercial and industrial zoning districts does not list Self Storage Facilities. The Village has previously considered the use similar to the "Warehouse, distribution & storage facilities" land use classification, which is permitted in the I1 District. The Petitioner seeks to amend the table to include a "Residential Storage Warehouse" as a permitted land use in the O /R, I1, and I3 District and as a Conditional Use in the B4 District. The text modification is indicated in bolded red text. The proposed land use table would read as follows: l PZ -17 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 26, 2014 14.604: LAND USE TABLE 2 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS KEY: P - Permitted; C - Conditional Use If a space is blank, use is not permitted in zoning district (edited 5- 07 -13) Business Type 131 B2 B3 B4 B5 135C O/R 11 13 Research laboratories and testing facilities P P Residential Storage Warehouse C P P P Restaurants, including entertainment and dancin _ P P P P C Page 3 Section 14.2224 Off - Street Parking Requirements The Village parking requirements do not include a parking requirement for storage facilities. The Petitioner seeks to amend the off - street parking requirement to include the following parking requirement for a "Residential Storage Warehouse ": Industrial: Manufacturing, research and 1 space per 1.5 employees plus 1 space per company development, utility vehicle. (Office space calculated separately.) Residential Storage Warehouse 1 space per 10,000 square feet of floor area. Warehouse 1 space per 1,500 square feet of gross floor area Waste handling and recycling 1 space per 1,500 square feet of gross floor area Section 14.2401 Definitions Lastly, The Petitioner seeks to add a definition for "Residential Storage Warehouse" to the zoning definitions to read as follows: Storage or warehousing service within a building for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise elsewhere. But in no case may storage spaces in a residential storage warehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale, business, or service use. Spaces may not be used for workshops, hobby shops, manufacturing, or similar uses. Human occupancy is limited to that required to transport, arrange and maintain stored materials. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The existing structure does not comply with the I1 bulk requirements, as it does not meet current setback requirements and the site exceeds 75% lot coverage. The structure does not meet the required side, rear, or lot coverage requirements in the I1 District. The table below compares the Petitioner's proposal to the bulk requirements of the I1 District. The Petitioner does not propose to modify the building footprint and the site will retain its legal non - conforming classification. The Petitioner proposes to decrease the nonconformity of the lot coverage by adding green space to the Subject Property. PZ -17 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 26, 2014 Page 4 Site Plan Per the attached site plan, the existing parking lot will be re- designed to comply with Village Code and provide additional landscaping. With the additional landscaping, the overall lot coverage would be reduced down to eighty seven (87) percent. The Petitioner's site plan indicates the site would provide twenty -nine (29) parking spaces, including one accessible parking space, which would not comply with the Illinois Accessibility Code. As shown, the site plan would require the following revisions: • Provide a minimum of two (2) accessible parking spaces. Each accessible parking space shall be 16 feet wide, including either an eight -foot or five -foot wide diagonally striped access aisle. The access aisle can be located on either side of the vehicle portion of the accessible space. Adjacent accessible parking spaces cannot share a common access aisle. High - quality yellow paint, manufactured especially for pavement striping, must be used. A U.S. Department of Transportation R7 -8 (Reserved Parking) and an R7 -I101 ($250 Fine) sign must be permanently mounted in the center of the 16 -foot wide accessible parking space. The signs must be placed no more than five feet from the front of the parking space. At a minimum, the bottom of the R7 -8 sign must be five feet from the pavement. • The parallel parking spaces located along the east property line are shown as eight (8) feet wide. They will be required to be widened to a minimum ten (10) feet. • The adjacent two -way drive aisle is shown as twenty -three (23) feet and four (4) inches wide, which would be too narrow. The two -way drive aisle shall be widened to twenty -four (24) feet wide. • A diagonally striped no- parking space should be provided along the west end of the front parking lot to allow for vehicle turn around in case all the parking spaces in the front of the building are occupied. • The ninety (90) degree spaces located on the perimeter can be reduced down to sixteen (16) feet deep if a two (2) foot overhang is provided free of the yard requirement. Building Elevations The Petitioner's application indicates the exterior building elevations will be updated to implement a new, fresh and contemporary image. The attached building elevations indicate the front elevation would consist of metal siding, panels, canopy, and a new aluminum storefront. The existing brick would remain in the side and rear building elevations. The building additions would be constructed of vertical and horizontal corrugated metal siding. The Petitioner indicates the front entrance would be brought up to code by providing a new accessible ramp. Landscaping The attached preliminary landscape plan provides a conceptual design with regards to the number, general type, and location of plantings. The Petitioner's landscape plan indicates new landscaping will be installed along the front elevation and south and east property lines. The landscape plan will be required to be revised to comply with Article XX111 of the Zoning Ordinance. For example, the parking lot landscape islands located in front of the building do not have the required shade tree or mix of plantings. One shade tree is required to be provided for every one hundred twenty (120) square feet of area in a landscape planting island. Live coverage shall consist of a mixture of planting material, including evergreens, shrubs, and perennials. Further the perimeter landscaping I1 District Requirements Existing Proposed Setbacks Front 30' min. 99.68' No change Interior 15' min. west -' 4.78 .78' -east No change Rear 20' min. 0' No change' Height 30' max. 26' 35' Lot Coverage 75% max. 88.86% 87.34% Site Plan Per the attached site plan, the existing parking lot will be re- designed to comply with Village Code and provide additional landscaping. With the additional landscaping, the overall lot coverage would be reduced down to eighty seven (87) percent. The Petitioner's site plan indicates the site would provide twenty -nine (29) parking spaces, including one accessible parking space, which would not comply with the Illinois Accessibility Code. As shown, the site plan would require the following revisions: • Provide a minimum of two (2) accessible parking spaces. Each accessible parking space shall be 16 feet wide, including either an eight -foot or five -foot wide diagonally striped access aisle. The access aisle can be located on either side of the vehicle portion of the accessible space. Adjacent accessible parking spaces cannot share a common access aisle. High - quality yellow paint, manufactured especially for pavement striping, must be used. A U.S. Department of Transportation R7 -8 (Reserved Parking) and an R7 -I101 ($250 Fine) sign must be permanently mounted in the center of the 16 -foot wide accessible parking space. The signs must be placed no more than five feet from the front of the parking space. At a minimum, the bottom of the R7 -8 sign must be five feet from the pavement. • The parallel parking spaces located along the east property line are shown as eight (8) feet wide. They will be required to be widened to a minimum ten (10) feet. • The adjacent two -way drive aisle is shown as twenty -three (23) feet and four (4) inches wide, which would be too narrow. The two -way drive aisle shall be widened to twenty -four (24) feet wide. • A diagonally striped no- parking space should be provided along the west end of the front parking lot to allow for vehicle turn around in case all the parking spaces in the front of the building are occupied. • The ninety (90) degree spaces located on the perimeter can be reduced down to sixteen (16) feet deep if a two (2) foot overhang is provided free of the yard requirement. Building Elevations The Petitioner's application indicates the exterior building elevations will be updated to implement a new, fresh and contemporary image. The attached building elevations indicate the front elevation would consist of metal siding, panels, canopy, and a new aluminum storefront. The existing brick would remain in the side and rear building elevations. The building additions would be constructed of vertical and horizontal corrugated metal siding. The Petitioner indicates the front entrance would be brought up to code by providing a new accessible ramp. Landscaping The attached preliminary landscape plan provides a conceptual design with regards to the number, general type, and location of plantings. The Petitioner's landscape plan indicates new landscaping will be installed along the front elevation and south and east property lines. The landscape plan will be required to be revised to comply with Article XX111 of the Zoning Ordinance. For example, the parking lot landscape islands located in front of the building do not have the required shade tree or mix of plantings. One shade tree is required to be provided for every one hundred twenty (120) square feet of area in a landscape planting island. Live coverage shall consist of a mixture of planting material, including evergreens, shrubs, and perennials. Further the perimeter landscaping PZ -17 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 26, 2014 Page 5 along Central only shows shade trees, which does not comply with the required perimeter landscaping. Since the Subject Property's front parking lot is located across the street from residential, continuous landscaping is required to be provided across one hundred (100) percent of the street frontage to a minimum height of three (3) feet. The plan does not indicate the proposed ground surface (sod, seed, mulch, etc...). Except where occupied by planting beds, all landscape areas shall be sodded. The Plant List and Details will be required to be revised to specify the quantity or ground surface. A revised drawing will be required. The Petitioner has not requested any relief from the landscape requirements and will be required to revise the landscape plan to meet Code. Li hg ting The Petitioner submitted a photometric plan that indicates four building lights and one parking lot light pole. The proposed fixture cut sheets indicate the light fixtures will be full cutoff. A detail indicating the overall height and pole material will be required to be submitted. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS The Petitioner is required to improve the interior of the building as required by Building and Fire Codes. A complete egress, building, and fire code review would be required at time of building permit application review. The Petitioner submitted a Plat of Survey for the Subject Property, but it was not legible. The Petitioner will be required to submit a legible Plat of Survey at time of building permit application. Fire Department An egress plan, including occupant loads, travel distances, egress widths, and common path of travel distances for the entire building will be required. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 will be required as well. Fire sprinkler shop drawings, hydraulic calculations, and equipment cut sheets shall be submitted for review. Further, a fire alarm system will be required. Fire alarm shop drawings with point to point wiring diagrams, battery load calculations, and equipment cut sheets shall be submitted. A standpipe system will be required for this project. Standpipe shop drawings and calculations shall be submitted. Finally, a fire pump will be required for this project. En in�g Sheet C -1 shows the parking lot to be reconfigured, reducing the amount of impervious surface. As part of this project the Central Road right of way abutting the property will have to be cleaned up by removing any unnecessary pavement and installing sod where possible. Any work in the Central Road right of way will require a permit from the Illinois Department of Transportation. STANDARDS FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS Section 14.203 (D) lists standards for the P &Z to consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code. The standards relate to: • The general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel; • Consistency of the amendment with objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan; • The degree to which the amendment would create non - conformity; • The degree to which the amendment would make the Zoning Code more permissive; and • Consistency of the amendment with Village policy as established by previous rulings. PZ -17 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 26, 2014 Page 6 The proposal to amend the Zoning Code to specifically address storage facilities would be applicable on a community-wide basis and would not create a non - conforming situation. The Village has considered such facilities as permitted in the industrial districts. There is an existing storage facility located at 708 W. Central Road, which is zoned I1. Staff is supportive of the Petitioner's request to amend the land use table to permit storage facilities in the I1 and I3 Districts, but not in the O/R nor as a Conditional Use in the 134 District. Further, in researching this matter, Staff recommends that the petitioner's proposal be modified so the land use classification is Mini - Warehouse instead of Residential Storage Warehouse. This would be consistent with current terminology for self - storage facilities. Therefore, Staff recommends the land use table is amended as follows: Section 14.604: Land Use Table 2 14.604: LAND USE TABLE 2 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS KEY: P - Permitted; C - Conditional Use If a space is blank, use is not permitted in zoning district (edited 5- 07 -13) Business Type B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 1 135C O/R 11 13 Medical or dental offices P P P P P P Mini - Warehouse P P Motorcycle, snowmobile, or personal watercraft sal C Staff is supportive of the Petitioner's request to amend the off - street parking requirement, however, does not feel one (1) space per 10,000 square feet of floor area would be sufficient. Instead, Staff recommends using the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) recommendation of 0.14 parking space per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area, in addition one (1) space per vehicle used in the conduct of the business. The office space would be calculated separately. Staff recommends the following parking requirement: Section 14.2224 Off - Street Parking Requirements Industrial: Manufacturing, research 1 space per 1.5 employees plus 1 space per company vehicle. and development, utility (Office space calculated separately.) Mini- Warehouse 0.14 parking space per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area, plus 1 space per vehicle used in the conduct of the business. (Office space calculated separately.) Warehouse 1 space per 1,500 square feet of gross floor area Waste handling and 1 space per 1,500 square feet of gross floor area recycling Therefore, the Subject Property would require a minimum of sixteen (16) parking spaces plus one (1) space per company vehicle. The Petitioner will be required to specify the number of vehicles used in the conduct of business and types of vehicles that will utilize the loading docks. Appropriate vehicle movement exhibits will be required to be provided as part of the building permit application. PZ -17 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 26, 2014 Page 7 Staff finds the Petitioner's definition acceptable as proposed for the Mini - Warehouse land use classification. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Text Amendment meets the standards contained in Section 14.203.13 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve the following motion: "To approve the text amendments outlined in this staff report for case PZ -17 -14 to Sections 14.604, 14.2224, and 14.2401 of the Village's Zoning Code regulations as follows: 1) Section 14.604: Land Use Table 2 — To add Mini - Warehouse as a permitted use in both the I -1 and I- 3 zoning districts. 2) Section 14.2224: Off Street Parking Requirements — To add Mini - Warehouse to the industrial section of the table with a parking requirement of 0.14 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, plus 1 space per vehicle used in the conduct of the business (Office space calculated separately). 3) Section 14.2401: Definitions — To add Mini - warehouse with the following definition: a. A storage or warehousing service within a building for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise elsewhere. But in no case may storage spaces in a mini - warehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale, business, or service use. Spaces may not be used for workshops, hobby shops, manufacturing, or similar uses. Human occupancy is limited to that required to transport, arrange and maintain stored materials." The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William J. Cooney, AICP Director of Community Development HAPLAN\Planning & Zoning CONUvftP&Z 2014 \Staff Reporls\PZ -17 -14 1750 W CenOal (Zoning Tcxl Amendmenisj 6ocx MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -17 -14 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: Hearing Date: June 26, 2014 1750 W. Central Road Morgan Group Inc. June 11, 2014 03- 33- 300 - 072 -0000 REQUEST: Chapter 14 Zoning Text Amendments: • Section 14.604 Land Use Table — List Residential Storage Warehouse • Section 14.2401 Definitions — Define Residential Storage Warehouse • Section 14.2224 Parking Regulations — Provide parking requirement for Residential Storage Warehouse MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTY: Agostino Filippone Thomas Fitzgerald William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Sharon Otteman Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development Christopher Michalek, Sullivan Goulette & Wilson Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Commissioner Youngquist made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Beattie to approve the minutes of the May 22, .2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 7 -0. After hearing one additional case Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ- 17 -14, 1750 W. Central Road. Ms. Andrade stated that the Petitioner for PZ -17 -14 is seeking zoning text amendments for a residential storage warehouse land use. Ms. Andrade stated that the Subject Property is located on the north side of Central Road, and is directly west of the Village Public Works building and contains an existing one and two -story office /warehouse building with related improvements. Planning and Zoning Commission - June 26, 2014 PZ -17 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Ms. Andrade stated that the Subject Property is zoned I1 Limited Industrial and is bordered to the west, north and east by the I1 district, and to the south by multi - family in Arlington Heights. Ms. Andrade explained that the Petitioner intends to renovate the interior of the existing building and add two stories to the center section of the building for an 83,998 square foot self - storage facility with 687 units. Ms. Andrade stated since the Zoning Ordinance does not specifically address self - storage facilities, the Petitioner is seeking to amend Section 14.604, 14.2401, and 14.2224 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ms. Andrade stated she received another version of the site plan earlier that same day which included revisions addressing some of Staff's review comments listed in the staff report. Ms. Andrade stated that the exterior building elevations will be updated to implement a new contemporary image. She further explained the buildings front elevation would consist of metal siding, panels, canopies and a new aluminum storefront. The existing brick would remain on the side and rear elevations of the building. Ms. Andrade explained that the building additions would be constructed of vertical and horizontal corrugated metal siding. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner would like to amend the land use table for commercial and industrial zoning districts to include "Residential Storage Warehouse" as a permitted land use in the O/R, Il, and 13 Districts and as a Conditional Use in the B4 District. Ms. Andrade stated, in regards to Section 14.2401, the Petitioner would like to add the following definition for "Residential Storage Warehouse ": Storage or warehousing service within a building for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials.for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise elsewhere. But in no case may storage spaces in a residential storage warehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale, business, or service use. Spaces may not he used for workshops, hobby shops, manufacturing, or similar uses. Human occupancy is limited to that required to transport, arrange and maintain stored materials. Ms. Andrade further stated the Petitioner is also requesting to amend the off-street parking requirement to include one (1) space per ten - thousand (10,000) square feet of floor area for a "Residential Storage Warehouse ". Ms. Andrade listed the standards for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code as: • The general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel; • Consistency of the amendment with objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive PIan; • The degree to which the amendment would create non - conformity; • Consistency of the amendment with Village policy as established by previous rulings. Ms. Andrade further explained the proposal to amend the Zoning Code to specifically address storage facilities would be applicable on a community -wide basis and would not create a non - conforming situation. The Village has considered such facilities as permitted in the industrial districts. There is an existing storage facility located at 708 W. Central Road, which is zoned Il . Planning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -17 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Ms. Andrade stated that Staff is supportive of the Petitioner's request to amend the land use table to permit storage facilities in the II and I3 Districts, but not in the O/R nor as a Conditional Use in the B4 District. Ms. Andrade further stated, Staff recommends that the petitioner's proposal be modified so the land use classification is Mini - Warehouse instead of Residential Storage Warehouse. This would be consistent with current terminology for self - storage facilities. Ms. Andrade also stated Staff is supportive of the Petitioner's request to amend the off-street parking requirement, however, does not feel one (1) space per 10,000 square feet of floor area would be sufficient. Instead, Staff recommends using the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) recommendation of 0.14 parking space per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area, in addition one (1) space per vehicle used in the conduct of the business. The office space would be calculated separately. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff finds the Petitioner's definition acceptable as proposed for the Mini - Warehouse land use classification. Ms. Andrade stated based on Staff's review, the proposed. Text Amendments meet the standards contained in Section 14.203.D of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve the following motion: "To approve the text amendments to Sections 14.604, 14.2224, and 14.2401 of the Village's Zoning Code regulations as follows: 1) Section 14.604: Land Use Table 2 — To add Mini - Warehouse as a permitted use in both the I- 1 and I -3 zoning districts.. 2) Section 14.2224: Off Street Parking Requirements — To add Mini - Warehouse to the industrial section of the table with a parking requirement of 0.14 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, plus 1 space per vehicle used in the conduct of the business (Office space calculated separately). 3) Section 14.2401: Definitions — To add Mini - warehouse with the following definition: a. A storage or warehousing service within a building for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise elsewhere. But in no case may storage spaces in a mini- warehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale, business, or service use. Spaces may not be used for workshops, hobby shops, manufacturing, or similar uses. Human occupancy is limited to that required to transport, arrange and maintain stored materials." She stated the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Commissioner Youngquist asked if the proposed Mini- Warehouse facility is still going to be built at Randhurst Village. Mr. Simmons stated the developers looked at other options for that particular site. However, a use exception was approved as part of the PUD for the project which would allow this type of use to be built as part of the overall project. Planning and Zoning Commission - June 26, 2014 PZ -17 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Chairman Donnelly asked if the texts amendments were to be approved, the project would then comply with the code. Staff confirmed. that he was correct. Chairman Donnelly swore in Christopher Michalek 444 N. Michigan Ave. Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Michalek stated the proposed project is to rehab an existing building into a Mini - Warehouse. The existing building is an industrial warehouse with some offices. He stated the project would consist of renovating the outside with metal canopies and store front; to make it a modern climate controlled storage facility. Mr. Michalek stated that an addition would be built in the center of the building. He stated the square footage. of the building would increase to about eighty -five thousand (85,000) square feet. In addition, he stated that landscaping would be added to the exterior to comply with the landscape setback and to reduce the amount of pervious surface on site. Chairman Donnelly asked if any of the storage units would be accessible from the outside. Mr. Michalek stated they will only be accessible from the interior of the facility. Commissioner Filippone asked if the facility would be open 24 hours. Mr. Michalek stated that it would only be open from 6:00 am until about 10:00 pm with office hours from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm. Commissioner Beattie asked how many parking spaces would be provided for the facility with the proposed parking amendment. Mr. Michalek stated that twenty -six (26) parking spaces would be provided. Ms. Andrade stated that the required amount of parking spaces would be sixteen (16) plus any additional spaces that would be used by the business. Commissioner Norbert asked on average how many cars would be visiting the facility. Mr. Michalek stated on average peak hour about four to five (4 -5) cars an hour. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any further questions; hearing none he opened the discussion to the public. Hearing none, Commissioner Younguist made a motion seconded by Commissioner Fitzgerald to approve the following motion: "To approve the text amendments to Sections. 14.604, 14.2224, and 14.2401 of the Village's Zoning Code regulations as follows: I) Section 14.604: Land Use Table 2 — To add Mini - Warehouse as a permitted use in both the I- 1 and I -3 zoning districts. 2) Section 14.2224: Off Street Parking Requirements — To add Mini - Warehouse to the industrial section of the table with a parking requirement of 0.14 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of PIanning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -17 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman gross floor area, plus 1 space per vehicle used in the conduct of the business (Office space calculated separately). 3) Section 14.2401: Definitions — To add Mini - warehouse with the following definition: a. A storage or warehousing service within a building for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise elsewhere. But in no case may storage spaces in a mini - warehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale business, or service use. Spaces may not be used for workshops, hobby shops, manufacturing, or similar uses. Human occupancy is limited to that required to transport, arrange and maintain stored materials." UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Fitzgerald, Beattie, Youngquist, Kueter, Mizwicki, Filippone, Donnelly NAYS: NONE The vote was approved 7 -0 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. After hearing two (2) additional cases Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Youngquist and the meeting was adjourned at 9:11 pm. Jen Moder, Administrative Assistant Co unity Development Planning. and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -17 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman S U L L I V A N • & W I L S O N A R C H I T E C T S 444 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1850 Chicago, Illinois 60611 W 312.988.7412 8 312.988.7409 1750 Central Rd. Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 Standards for Text Amendment 1. The degree to which the proposed amendment has general applicability within the Village at large and not intended to benefit specific property. This amendment will be applicable to any new residential self - storage facility in the Village of Mt. Prospect. 2. The consistency of the proposed amendment with the objectives of the Village Code and the intent of the applicable zoning district regulations. The proposed amendment remains consistent with existing objectives while defining a use -type within an existing allowed use category. 3. The degree to which the proposed amendment would create nonconformity. The proposed amendment would not create nonconformity because there is not currently a zoning use -type for residential self - storage. 4. The degree to which the proposed amendment would make the Village Code more permissive. The proposed amendment will define residential self - storage in the Village of Mt. Prospect allowing for the zoning code to be more permissive of this use. 5. The consistency of the proposed amendment with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that it defines the zoning guidelines for an existing permitted use. 6. The degree to which the proposed amendment is consistent with Village policy as established in previous rulings on petitioners involving similar circumstances. It is assumed that other storage facilities have sought and received a variance for a reduction in the required parking ratio. 14-0514 for Text Amendment -1- 05 -15 -01 Self- Storage 1750 Central Village of Mount Prospect Project Narrative 5/15/14 Introduction The Morgan Group, of Chicago Illinois is seeking a plan approval and zoning text amendment, for the vacant building at 1750 Central, in the Village of Mount Prospect. The development will establish a premier, climate controlled residential self- storage facility. Proposed Project- The proposed Self Storage Facility will renovate the interior of the existing building and add two stories to the center section of the building. The exterior fagade will be updated to implement a new, fresh and contemporary image. The front entry sequence will be brought up to code by providing a new accessible ramp. The existing parking lot will be re- designed to comply with Village code and provide a net increase in impervious surface. Purpose for Text Amendment — The current zoning code for the village of Mount Prospect does not include a definition for `Residential Self- Storage' or an appropriate parking ratio for the use. In the past, self- storage facilities would be required to apply for a parking variance. We are seeking to alleviate this process by proposing a realistic parking ratio to be by right for this use. In the past, it has been our experience that a facility of this size, 80,000 — 90,000 gross sq. ft. has been required, by other local municipalities, to provide less parking than what the current Mount Prospect code calls for. Earlier this year, a similar sized facility in Skokie was required to provide 13 parking spaces. Attached is the parking determination form Skokie. In 2012, the Village of Tinley Park did not require any additional parking than the 13 provided on site, when we sought approval for a 16,000 sq. ft. addition to a 72,000 sq. ft. facility. Staff report is attached. Finally, a recent75,000 sq. ft. project on Sheridan road in the city of Chicago, did not require any parking as determined by the assistant zoning administrator. Parking determination letter attached. Given its urban location and availability of street parking, this is not an apples to apples example, but it does demonstrate that the use is of very low intensity, thus the parking ratio should reflect this. Supporting this is the Self- Storage Association internal data: For an "institutional" sized facility — over 50,000 net rentable square feet. Using computer gate entry information from various facilities across the United States, we found a usage level of approximately 6.5 vehicle trips per 100 rented units per day. So a facility with 50,000 square feet which would give you approximately 420 rental units (120 square foot average size) and a 90% occupancy level = 378 rented spaces; would produce about 25 vehicle trips per day. Now keep in mind this is for an established facility at 90% occupancy. You can anticipate increased vehicle trips from initial opening to stabilized lease -up (above 80 %), but of course you do not have the same number of rented units. The Trip Generation Handbook — 7th Edition, prepared and distributed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers — Washington, DC, forecasts almost double my figures based on a much smaller sample size. Even using their figures, it shows the benign nature of total vehicle trips to a self- storage business compared to the same square footage of other real estate asset classes. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT: SECTION 1 That the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance be amended by amending Article VI Section 14.604 of the Village Code to add as a permitted use in the O/R , I -1, and I -3 Districts and as a conditional use in the B -4 District, Residential Storage Warehouse. Residential Storage Warehouse shall be defined as: Storage or warehousing service within a building for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise elsewhere. But in no case may storage spaces in a residential storage warehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale, business, or service use. Spaces may not be used for workshops, hobby shops, manufacturing, or similar uses. Human occupancy is limited to that required to transport, arrange and maintain stored materials. SECTION 2 The ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and due publication. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT: SECTION I That the Mount Prospect Village Code by amended by amending Article XXII Section 14.2224 to add an off parking requirement for Residential Storage Warehouse; 1 space per 10,000 square feet of floor area SECTION 2 The ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and due publication. 140'-l" 149.79' MASONRY MASONRY MASONRY W EXISTING ST OFFICE 1,058 SOFT 0 0 0 0 a � &� ° a 26 CAR N > PARKING LOT 9 p NP. o c o o� I. EXISTING OADING NEW STAI I NEW I NEW ELE LOADING 24' -0" 16' -0" Ij P11" BUILDING DATA GROSS SOFT 1ST FLOOR 29,533 SOFT (2,126 SOFT LOADINC 2ND FLOOR 31,659 SQFT 3RD FLOOR 22,806 SOFT TOTAL GROSS SOFT 83,998 SOFT NET STORAGE SOFT 1ST FLOOR 21,925 SOFT 2ND FLOOR 23,625 SOFT 3RD FLOOR 16,850 SOFT TOTAL NET STORAGE 62,400 SOFT TOTAL # OF UNITS 0 AVE. UNIT SIZE 91 SOFT 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O OFFICE 1,058 SOFT 0 0 0 0 a � &� ° a 26 CAR N > PARKING LOT 9 p NP. o c o o� I. EXISTING OADING NEW STAI I NEW I NEW ELE LOADING 24' -0" 16' -0" Ij P11" BUILDING DATA GROSS SOFT 1ST FLOOR 29,533 SOFT (2,126 SOFT LOADINC 2ND FLOOR 31,659 SQFT 3RD FLOOR 22,806 SOFT TOTAL GROSS SOFT 83,998 SOFT NET STORAGE SOFT 1ST FLOOR 21,925 SOFT 2ND FLOOR 23,625 SOFT 3RD FLOOR 16,850 SOFT TOTAL NET STORAGE 62,400 SOFT TOTAL # OF UNITS 687 AVE. UNIT SIZE 91 SOFT W. CENTRAL ROAD PNO -WA� NORTH FIRST FLOOR PLAN (ID =%mpmm%� 6 g 16' 32 64' S U L L I V A N MORGAN GROUP INC. DEVELOPERS 1750 W. CENTRAL ROAD & w I L s o N JUNE 26, 2014 MT. PROSPECT, ILLINOIS o,. 1-,o,.. _,_ 140'-l" 149.79' MASONRY of O a MASONRY W, EXISTING ST 100' -2" i STAI R ELEVATOR A O O NORTH SECOND FLOOR PLAN p 8 16 32 64' S U L L I V A N MORGAN GROUP INC. DEVELOPERS 1750 W. CENTRAL R O A D & w I L s o N MAY 1 4 , 2 0 1 4 MT. P R O S P E C T , I L L I N O I S 149.79' ROOF BELOW MASONRY WALL —lEW STAIR I I NEW ELEVATOR w o I I N O A O � O N O N a I I MASONRY WA L I EXISTING STAIR I ROOF BELOW I I I 150.02' NORTH THIRD FLOOR PLAN o a is 32 64' S U L L I V A N MORGAN GROUP INC. DEVELOPERS 1750 W. CENTRAL ROAD & W 1 L s o N MAY 14, 2 01 4 MT. PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 1750 WEST CENTRAL ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, IL PARKING LOT MODIFICATIONS IT I—OuT SITE LOCATION MAP HIRARY E3111 lY THAT HE aH PUBLIC RIGI Z11 RESPECT TO STORM DRAINAGE, AND LIAT crvcmEEa A ry \' onrE �r feoaJ as � o U Q U � _ }\ o \ 1 ^ 1 .��� I C-2 I z x � � 72 A - \\ Q }� �( \) ; !} ! �.no L tI El 1750 CENTRAL SELF STORAGE MORGAN GROUP, INC_ I LANDSCAPE PLAN _� mouf.r vrzosva LANDSCAPE PLAN L -101 ©... .............. ............. I SAMPLE PLAN T ONTHEP E corvTaecTwRE lrvocwim ory THE VLwvs.INTHE EVExr or wvr DacaEVU�cIES, THE CONraecr TE. -Q uw U..D rvTHE —L ll- va DLDE Loa wLOaNgioN orvtr vuNr OUwNrm ¢ UNDERTHE ue�(DO rvoT vauNE,sigaE, oR sHwu Rwsm oNTNEpuwNnnESSVnvry ory aNEVUrvs Do SO OTHE aNDS— E—HllE w R s—EewTOI ) IDSTqu 0" PL El,=IEMIIIIMI RALL vnRR RuRW.AlD PLlM a L SLAWa v LL, \ rU WIRF Vg1E) 1— AND SOLD DOWN Rwro �� 1\ urEA, E EmFMENS Oq6 G o -I r 11 R IeNL - TRALLON 1AM PED SOIL �ITOIE 'T1 E 2 DECIDUOUS TREE INSTALLATION H DETAIL L r— Va n mH ROOT RALLD u I Hlvp O m wmlw IRE RODID THE ROOT D 4 a NIO. NAN , --LE) � vIq mNfg E E' D ��� I �HN6HGMDF ESHRUe � --ED OR .IXImnG SOIL 4 SHRUB INSTALLATION DETAIL _ =� —=R PROPER 0, NALL— OR RENNIlLL6l p a + + + + N roLDEPTU 00 +/ R �gTED° .L � + 00+ 3 ORNAMENTAL GRASS, PERENNIAL& GROUNDCOVER INSTALLATION 1750 CENTRAL SELF STORAGE MORGAN GROUP, INC- PLANT LIST DETAILS LD201 0 � �s ® ®moo m � �seoe m � �seoe m � �seve� m u use ® ®ev m u use ® saamv ®ev o A Asa ® ®ev m � �se�ev 0 u use ® ®ev m s sese� m e eoee� m � �ovvo� SAMPLE PLAN T ONTHEP E corvTaecTwRE lrvocwim ory THE VLwvs.INTHE EVExr or wvr DacaEVU�cIES, THE CONraecr TE. -Q uw U..D rvTHE —L ll- va DLDE Loa wLOaNgioN orvtr vuNr OUwNrm ¢ UNDERTHE ue�(DO rvoT vauNE,sigaE, oR sHwu Rwsm oNTNEpuwNnnESSVnvry ory aNEVUrvs Do SO OTHE aNDS— E—HllE w R s—EewTOI ) IDSTqu 0" PL El,=IEMIIIIMI RALL vnRR RuRW.AlD PLlM a L SLAWa v LL, \ rU WIRF Vg1E) 1— AND SOLD DOWN Rwro �� 1\ urEA, E EmFMENS Oq6 G o -I r 11 R IeNL - TRALLON 1AM PED SOIL �ITOIE 'T1 E 2 DECIDUOUS TREE INSTALLATION H DETAIL L r— Va n mH ROOT RALLD u I Hlvp O m wmlw IRE RODID THE ROOT D 4 a NIO. NAN , --LE) � vIq mNfg E E' D ��� I �HN6HGMDF ESHRUe � --ED OR .IXImnG SOIL 4 SHRUB INSTALLATION DETAIL _ =� —=R PROPER 0, NALL— OR RENNIlLL6l p a + + + + N roLDEPTU 00 +/ R �gTED° .L � + 00+ 3 ORNAMENTAL GRASS, PERENNIAL& GROUNDCOVER INSTALLATION 1750 CENTRAL SELF STORAGE MORGAN GROUP, INC- PLANT LIST DETAILS LD201 Va n mH ROOT RALLD u I Hlvp O m wmlw IRE RODID THE ROOT D 4 a NIO. NAN , --LE) � vIq mNfg E E' D ��� I �HN6HGMDF ESHRUe � --ED OR .IXImnG SOIL 4 SHRUB INSTALLATION DETAIL _ =� —=R PROPER 0, NALL— OR RENNIlLL6l p a + + + + N roLDEPTU 00 +/ R �gTED° .L � + 00+ 3 ORNAMENTAL GRASS, PERENNIAL& GROUNDCOVER INSTALLATION 1750 CENTRAL SELF STORAGE MORGAN GROUP, INC- PLANT LIST DETAILS LD201 14.2219: PARKING LOT LIGHTING: In addition to the requirements outlined below, all parking lot lighting shall comply with the outdoor lighting regulations included in section 14.314 of this chapter. All parking lots with more than four (4) spaces shall provide lighting. Artificial lighting used to illuminate any parking lot shall comply with the regulations as set forth in this section. A. General Requirements: 1. Pole Height And Material: a. The total height of light fixtures, including the pole, pole support, fixture and related equipment, shall be limited to the district height limit or a maximum of thirty feet (30'), whichever is less. b. Light poles shall be constructed of metal, or other material acceptable to the village engineer. Wood poles are prohibited. 2. Glare Onto Adjacent Properties Prohibited: Electric lighting used to illuminate off street parking areas or driveways shall be directed away from adjacent properties and rights of way in such a way as to not create a nuisance. The following illumination standards shall be: a. Light intensity at a property line abutting a residential property shall not exceed 0.1 foot - candle. b. Light intensity at a property line abutting a nonresidential property or right of way shall not exceed 0.5 foot - candle. 3. Protection Of Lighting Fixtures: Light poles in a parking lot shall be protected from vehicles by curbed landscape islands or curbed landscape diamonds. 4. Illumination Levels And Uniformity: The following criteria for minimum illumination, maximum illumination, and uniformity shall be met for all parking lots: Minimum IES Illumination Level Type Of Development (Foot- Candles) Multi- family residential 0.1 Commercial 0.2 Maximum IES Illumination Level (Foot - Candles) i 1.5 2.4 Uniformity 4 :1 (ave. /min.) 15 :1 (max. /min.) 3 :1 (ave. /min.) 12 :1 (max. /min.) �sx MOST CURRENT - i LIED LED LIGHT FIXTURE SQUARE STEEL 111LE L E RGLE GRADE SITE LIGHTING POLE DETAIL MOST CURRENT C I MAR RO N LED cat.# Approvals SPAULDING Job Type LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS Construction: • Stylish vertically finned die -cast solid top housing for maximum heat dissipation; Stops collection of unsightly debris from gathering on top of the housing • Rugged lower the -cast aluminum heat sink accelerates thermal management and optimizes PCB and optical perfor- mance • Separate optical and electrical compart- ment for optimum component operation • One piece die cut silicone gasket ensures weather proof seal around each individual LED for IP65 rating • Backlight Control (BC) option available for 85% spill light reduction, doesn't change fixture appearance or EPA, recommended for Type III and Type IV distributions • Stamped bezel provides mechanical compression to seal the optical assembly • Complements the Hubbell Southwest series of outdoor fixtures • Weight - 45.0 pounds, EPA - 1.3 ft' • Features exclusive wiHUBB technology - Wireless system for On /Off and 0 -1 OVDC full range dimming control - Programmable autonomous operation • Suitable for applications requiring 3G testing prescribed by ANSI C136.31 Optics: • Choice of 72 high brightness LED configu- rations with individual acrylic lenses specially designed for IES Type II, III, IV and V distributions • CCT: 3000K (80 CRI), 4200K (70 CRI), 5100K (67 CRI), and turtle friendly Amber LED options • CRI: 70 Electrical: • Universal input voltage 120 -277 VAC, 50/60 Hz • Integral step -down transformer for 347V & 480V • Ambient operating temperature -40° C to 40° C • Automatic thermal self - protection • Drivers have greater than 90% power factor and less than 10% TH D • Optional continuous dimming to 10% or dual circuitry available • LED drivers have output power over - voltage, over - current protection and short circuit protection with auto recovery • 1050 mA driver available with 90L con- figuration for increased lumen output • LED electrical assembly, including PR devices, consumes no power in the 'off' state • Surge protection of 1 OKA 8/20 pSec wave; clamping voltage of 320V & surge rating of 273J Lumen maintenance: • L90 at 60,000 hours (Projected per IESNA TM- 21 -11) Installation: • Two the -cast aluminum arm designs: The decorative arm offers a sleek upswept look while the straight arm follows the housing's contoured lines for continuity of style • Fixture ships with arm installed for ease of installation and mounts to #2 drill pattern • Wall bracket, mast arm fitter and pole accessories are also available allowing easy mounting for virtually any application Finish: • TGIC thermoset polyester powder paint finish applied at nominal 2.5 mil thickness Warranty: Five year limited warranty (for more infor- mation visit: http: / /www.hubbelloutdoor.com/ resources /warranty/ Listings: • Listed to UL1598 and CSA C22.2 #250.0- 24 for wet locations • Models meet DesignLights Consor- tium (DLC) qualifications, consult DLC website for more details: hftp://www.desiqnliqhts.orq/QPL • IDA approved • IP65 CERTIFICATIONS /LISTINGS ca C US � lighting UBB facts PRODUCT IkM GE(S) 90 LED 3/4 VIEW 30 LED N 60 LED 90 LED DIMENSIONS Upswept Arm G —] Straight Arm r E -1 r l � 6 3/4" 21 3/4" 16" 6 5/8" 6 5/16" 55/8 6 1/8" 171 mm 552mm 406mm 168mm 160mm 143mm 155mm ORDERING INFORMATION SEE NEXT PAGE SPAULDING Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864 - 678 -1000 LIGHTING Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. ©2014 SPAULDING LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.spauldinglighting.com • Printed in USA CLILED -SPEC 4/14 ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE: CL1- A- 90LU- 5K -3 -DB -RPA3 CL1 - - - - CL1 Cimarron LED 90L 90 High brightness LEDs U Universal 120V -277V, 3K 3000K 60L 60 High brightness LEDs 50/60 Hz 4K 4200K 30L 30 High brightness LEDs 1' 120V 5K 5100K 2' 208V AM' Amber (590 nm 3' 240V available for A Arm mount construction (6" straight 4 277V 'Turtle Friendly" rigid arm included & acceptable for 90° applications configurations) 5 480V, 60 Hz (consu It factory) AD Decorative arm mount const. (6" decora- F 347V, 60 Hz tive upswept arm incl. & acceptable for 90 configurations) E 4 220V, 50 Hz 2 Type II MAF Mast arm fitter for mounting to standard 3 Type III 2 3/8" mast arm bracket, includes 6" straight rigid arm 4 Type IV 5M Type V Medium Leave blank for 700mA (standard) 035 350mA Amber CCT only 105 1050 mA (use with 90L only for higher lumen output) DB Dark Bronze BL Black WH White GR Gray PS Platinum Silver RD Red (premium color) FG Forest Green (premium color) CC Custom Color BC Backlight control BL' Bi -level control CDz Continuous dimming WB Wall bracket RPA3 3" Round pole adapter RPA4 4" Round pole adapter RPA5 5" Round pole adapter RPA6 6" Round pole adapter F(X) Fusing (replace X with I voltage: 1 - 1 20V, 2 -208V, 3 -24OV, 4 -277V, 5 -48OV, 6 -347V) SSB Stainless steel LED bezel VG Vandal guard CONTROL OPTIONS SCO Motion sensor On /Off control, No light output when no mo- tion detected SCP Programmable motion control, factory default is 50% PR (X)5 NEMA Photo cell receptacle (replace X with voltage: U= 120 -277, 5 =480, 6 =347) WIH In- fixture wireless control module (120, 277, 347 & 480V) ENERGY SAVING DATA ENERGY DATA Power Factor >.9 Total Harmonic Distortion I <10% ACCESSORIES SEE NEXT PAGE 30L 5K 5S Type V Short :t 87 5W Type V Wide 6164 2L Type II Rotated 7108 90° left 6619 3L Type III Rotated 60L 5K 90° left 157 4L Type IV Rotated 12842 90° left 13185 2R Type II Rotated 12954 90° right 90L 5K 3R Type III Rotated Notes: 1- For BL option 90L and 60L; N/A 347V & 480V 90° right 2 - BL & CD cannot be combined 3 - Fuse option not available with universal voltage 4R Type IV Rotated 4 - Select F3 fusing option for 220V 90° right 5 - Photocell receptacle not available with BL option 6 @700mA 6 - Recommended for Type III and IV distributions only 336 7 - Select Only When using voltage specific Option (F or WIH) 26974 8 - Available In 350mA drive current only Type IV, 5M 26548 Leave blank for 700mA (standard) 035 350mA Amber CCT only 105 1050 mA (use with 90L only for higher lumen output) DB Dark Bronze BL Black WH White GR Gray PS Platinum Silver RD Red (premium color) FG Forest Green (premium color) CC Custom Color BC Backlight control BL' Bi -level control CDz Continuous dimming WB Wall bracket RPA3 3" Round pole adapter RPA4 4" Round pole adapter RPA5 5" Round pole adapter RPA6 6" Round pole adapter F(X) Fusing (replace X with I voltage: 1 - 1 20V, 2 -208V, 3 -24OV, 4 -277V, 5 -48OV, 6 -347V) SSB Stainless steel LED bezel VG Vandal guard CONTROL OPTIONS SCO Motion sensor On /Off control, No light output when no mo- tion detected SCP Programmable motion control, factory default is 50% PR (X)5 NEMA Photo cell receptacle (replace X with voltage: U= 120 -277, 5 =480, 6 =347) WIH In- fixture wireless control module (120, 277, 347 & 480V) ENERGY SAVING DATA ENERGY DATA Power Factor >.9 Total Harmonic Distortion I <10% ACCESSORIES SEE NEXT PAGE 30L 5K .1 t 70 :t 87 6384 6164 LIUMENS DELIVERED 6641 7108 6999 6619 0 U 2 @700mA 60L 5K 140 157 13300 12842 13125 13185 13675 12954 4 @700mA 90L 5K 210 227 19684 19006 19202 20592 19610 18973 6 @700mA 90L 5K 105 336 363 26974 25351 26548 25793 27445 25195 6 @1050mA 30L -4K 70 87 6089 6109 6104 6417 6439 6046 2 @700mA 60L -4K 140 157 11583 11468 12036 12038 12581 11807 4 @700mA 9OL -4K 210 227 17143 16973 17648 18521 20220 17394 6 @700mA 9OL -4K -105 336 363 23896 23912 24199 24583 25357 23128 6 @1050mA 30L -3K 70 87 4606 4668 4686 4858 4902 4601 2 @700mA 60L -3K 140 157 9013 9175 9216 9409 9461 8844 4 @700mA 9OL -3K 210 227 13360 13601 13575 13923 14004 13902 6 @700mA 9OL -3K -105 336 1 363 1 176451 176121 174691 179501 18271T 17330 6 @1050mA SPAULDING Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864 - 678 -1000 LIGHTING Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2014 SPAULDING LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.spauldinglighting.com • Printed in USA CLI LED-SPEC 4114 ACCESSORIES t t t Description CR- RPA3 -XX' Round pole adapter for straight arm (3 - 3 ") CR- RPA4 -XX' Round pole adapter for straight arm (3 - 4 ") CR- RPA5 -XX' Round pole adapter for straight arm (5") CR- RPA6 -XX' Round pole adapter for straight arm (6 ") CRD- RPA2 -XX' Round pole adapter for upswept arm (2 - 3' /a ") CRD - RPA3 -XX' Round pole adapter for upswept arm (3 - 3 ") CRD - RPA4 -XX' Round pole adapter for upswept arm (3 - 4 ") CRD - RPA5 -XX' Round pole adapter for upswept arm (5") CRD - RPA6 -XX' Round pole adapter for upswept arm (6 ") WB- CR -XX' Wall bracket TPLB -XX' Twin parallel luminaire bracket MAF- CL -XX Horizontal mast arm fitter for 2 3/8" OD arm. Mounts to standard 6" arm (ordered with fixture) 1 Replace XX with color choice, eg.: DB for Dark Bronze 2 When ordering poles, specify Pole Drill Pattern #2 3 Fixture must include standard 6" arm MOUNTING ACCESSORIES 2.50 O 5.59 3.40 L 1 I Li.ts L 3.89- 5.62 MAF — HORIZONTAL MAST ARM FITTER POLE COVER POLE COVER FIXTURE CAST ARM ® NUT PLATE ° ROUND POLE CAST ADAPTER NUT PLATE SQUARE POLE tt Description RM- CL- K- TA -XX' Adjustable mounting arm for single fixture (2 -3/8 tenon) — 5 lbs. 2.3 kgs. RM- CL- TK- TA -XX' Adjustable mounting arm for two fixtures at 180 (2 -3/8 tenon) — 7 lbs. 3.2 kgE RM- CL- K -S -XX' 10" adjustable arm — .5 lbs. .05 kgs. — 5.75 lbs. 2.6 kgs. 1 Replace XX with color choice, eg.: DB for Dark Bronze ARM- CL- K -TA -XX ARM- CL- K -S -XX 2 Fixture must include standard 6" straight arm ARM- CL- TK -TA -XX III TENON TOP POLE BRACKET ACCESSORIES (2 3/8" OD tenon) (RSS version requires 4" round pole adapter) SETA -XX' I Square pole tenon adapter (4 at 90 degrees) RETA -XX' I Round pole tenon adapter (4 at 90 degrees) TETA -XX' I Hexagonal pole tenon adapter (3 at 120 degrees) 1 Replace XX with color choice, eg.: DB for D( PHOTOCONTROL EQUIPMENT Catal Number Descriptio SCREwa` UPSWEPT ARM MOUNT COVER SQUARE & ROUND POLES POLE T Photocontrol - twist -lock cell (48OV) PTL -6 Photocontrol - twist -lock cell (347V) PSC Shorting cap - twist -lock 2.25 (� .875 3.5 0 875 1 10 .563 HOLE 2 HOLES tt Description RM- CL- K- TA -XX' Adjustable mounting arm for single fixture (2 -3/8 tenon) — 5 lbs. 2.3 kgs. RM- CL- TK- TA -XX' Adjustable mounting arm for two fixtures at 180 (2 -3/8 tenon) — 7 lbs. 3.2 kgE RM- CL- K -S -XX' 10" adjustable arm — .5 lbs. .05 kgs. — 5.75 lbs. 2.6 kgs. 1 Replace XX with color choice, eg.: DB for Dark Bronze ARM- CL- K -TA -XX ARM- CL- K -S -XX 2 Fixture must include standard 6" straight arm ARM- CL- TK -TA -XX III TENON TOP POLE BRACKET ACCESSORIES (2 3/8" OD tenon) (RSS version requires 4" round pole adapter) SETA -XX' I Square pole tenon adapter (4 at 90 degrees) RETA -XX' I Round pole tenon adapter (4 at 90 degrees) TETA -XX' I Hexagonal pole tenon adapter (3 at 120 degrees) 1 Replace XX with color choice, eg.: DB for D( PHOTOCONTROL EQUIPMENT Catal Number Descriptio PTL 7 Photocontrol - twist -lock cell (120V) PTL -8 Photocontrol - twist -lock cell (120 -277V) PTL -5 Photocontrol - twist -lock cell (48OV) PTL -6 Photocontrol - twist -lock cell (347V) PSC Shorting cap - twist -lock #2 DRILL PATTERN FOR POLES LIGHTING FACTS lighting facts Light output (Lumens) 6274 Watts 68.4 Lumens per Walt (EHleacy) 91 �Oef ACCUr .. 74 Ligr,ecnw. rt. 4021 ISN AtiYhilel onwe s —IV-0 on .*. a for enana lighting facts Light Output ILumena) 6892 Wotcs 69.7 Lumens per Walt IEM—y) 98. 5408 i0ayllghtl onsw�� '•,yy •wpIplNln�vett. wm�p�aEUCfa Eor Ena�la lighting facts Light Output (LUmene) 15456 Wane 208.9 Lumens per Wm JEtrcacyi 72 Y46 deem Ier M lr� Yrrr p..an lighting facts Light Output ILumena) z2898.. worts 339.5 Lumens per Watt (Efticacyl 67 75 a 4102 I6rlght Whlleg um wm Sea-- eqh —,1ncn aa­roev 1., a.11 SPAULDING Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864 - 678 -1000 LIGHTING Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subjectto change without notice. © 2014 SPAULDING LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.spauldinglighting.com • Printed in USA CLILED -SPEC 4114 TRP /RDI LED 0 ARCHITECTURAL WALLPACKS Cat.# Approvals SPAULDING Hob Type LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS Applications: • Architectural wallpack in two stylish shapes with molded contours to accentu- ate building architecture. Provides excellent illumination in energy- saving LED systems. Construction: • Die -cast aluminum housing and door • Seven powder coat standard finishes LED: • 30 high power LEDs deliver up to 5,062 lumens • Up to 105 Lumens per watt • Different lenses offer a variety of distribu- tion patterns - Type II, III, and IV (Forward Throw) • 3000K - 80 CRI, 4200K - 70 CRI, and 5100K - 67 CRI, CCT nominal Electrical: • Two driver options: 34w at 350mA and 53w at 525mA • Operating temperature: PRODUCT IMAGE(S) TRP Electrical (Cont.): • 120- 277VAC, 50 /6OHz RDI DIMENSIONS • Power factor > 90% • THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) <20% • 10 KVA, 270 joules surge suppressor Controls: Drivers are 0 -1 OV dimming standard. Photocell and occupancy sensors available for complete on /off and dimming control. Listings: • UL 1598 listed for use in wet locations • 4K and 5K models meet DesignLights Consortium (DLC) qualifications, consult DLC website for more details: http://www.desiqnliqhts.orq/QP • Zero uplight (UO), dark sky, neighbor friendly • Drivers IP66 and RoHS compliant Warranty: For more information visit: http://www.hubbelloutdoor.com/resources warranty/ 7.13" (180 mm) 9.25" (235 mm) 14" (355 mm) TRP Weight: 13.2 Ibs 5.98 kg 16.5" (420 K. INF SHIPPING Catalog G.W(kg)/ Carton Dimensions Number CTN I Length Width Height Inch (cm) Inch (cm) Inch (cm) CERTIFICATIONS /LISTINGS Ceus ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE: TRP- 30L5K- 053- 2 -U -DB .1 r• t t C t• t TRP Trapezoid 30L 30 High 3K 3000K nominal 053 525mA 2 Type II U 120V -277V DB Bronze U PTI C INS F' Fusing RDI Radius brightness 4K 4200K nominal 035 350mA 3 Type III 1' 120V BL Black PC' Photocontrol (Must LEDs (Must specify specify 5K 5100K nominal 4 Type IV 2' 208V FG Forest individual individual 3' 240V Green voltage) voltage) GR Gray SCO Motion sensor 4' 277V On /Off control, PS Platinum No light RD Red output when no motion WH White detected ' Must specify individual voltage for PC and Fusing options CC Custom SCP Programmable 0- 10Vfully adjustable dimming with automatic daylight calibration and different time delay settings, must order Color motion control, minimum of one remote control to program dimming settings, consult factory for details, not available for 208V factory default ' Consult factory for Custom Color option IS 50% ° 1 DLC qualification 4K and 5K models only s PC option not applicable, included in sensor. For SCP, PC function turns on to lower setting until motion is detected ACCESSORIES - Order separately SPAULDING Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864 - 678 -1000 LIGHTING Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2014 SPAULDING LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.spauldinglighting.com • Printed in USA RDI (tao mm) Weight: 13.1 1 b 5.94 kg (235 mm� �(4 0 TRP /RDI -SPEC 4114 PERFORMANCE DATA ELECTRICAL DATA PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE OPERATING HOURS Ambient TM- 21 -11' L70 Temp. 0 25,000 50,000 60,000 100,000 (hours) ® 11 1•: 1• 1•. 1• � 111 �1' 1�' 1 •• 1 •• 1 • 1 • 1 • . 111 1 Nichia 2196, 700mA, 85'C Ts, 10,000hrs Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the TRP base model in a 40'C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing per IESNA LM- 80 -08. PHOTOMETRIC REPORTS TYPE II LUMINAIREAMBIENT TEMPERATURE FACTOR (LATE) Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0 -40'C (32- 104 °F). TYPE III SPAULDING Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864 - 678 -1000 LIGHTING Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2014 SPAULDING LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.spauldinglighting.com • Printed in USA TRIP/1101-SPEC 4114 Lumen values are from photometric tests performed at a NVLAP certified labratory in accordance with IESNA LM- 79 -08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown. Actual performance may differ as a result of end -user environment, application and performance tolerances of the electrical components. TYPE IV (Foward throw) 0' C 32' F 1.02 10' C 50' F 1.01 20' C 68' F 1.00 25' C 77° F 1.00 30' C 86' F 1.00 40' C 104'F 0.99 50° C 122° F 0.98 Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0 -40'C (32- 104 °F). TYPE III SPAULDING Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864 - 678 -1000 LIGHTING Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2014 SPAULDING LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.spauldinglighting.com • Printed in USA TRIP/1101-SPEC 4114 Lumen values are from photometric tests performed at a NVLAP certified labratory in accordance with IESNA LM- 79 -08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown. Actual performance may differ as a result of end -user environment, application and performance tolerances of the electrical components. TYPE IV (Foward throw) E qnj5 c,wmmxvc xc+� m�Eg.,o,ae�m� u vmm oEa �\ - E-rawmcxuxcx a 1­11 0 W.i mu °Y°aM1 °OJOX - Lmes shown nEREOwwExE rArcEx >e, EwLO omauJr u,Envsss.w sa E,.co.� xES) -- www�%, w� ,��.»wxxsx.,,E,x. EMEwF.xEw .xx.E �E .. I t� L fit. �I •� m ONE -STORY FRAME GARAGE .$ � m m W 0 o �* L+mm c.�or r'= "comrewsw�n W Q A �wA� xicx A s r� �oE A.L.T.A. ! A.C.S B A R R I N G T O N E N G I N E E R I N G CONSULTANTS, LTD. wrovuvnKeic. cm�c�rccwcram xn am„n oxAwx sv: x ,,.n aEVSioxs GxECKEx KV: KE ooKC sx�sq twxao I�A211 SCALE: t'= c uEnr:. oww� Ean�o+. L,E. 9830 -1 II N de: T' = 20' WCATION MAP NO SCALE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, the Petitioner (Morgan Group, Inc.) has filed an application for certain text amendments to Article of Chapter 14 (Zoning), of the Mount Prospect Village Code to amend various regulations; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks amendments to the following sections of the Village Code: Section 14.604 LAND USE TABLE Section 14.2224 PARKING REGULATIONS Section 14.2401 DEFINITIONS and; WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the proposed amendments, being the subject of PZ-17-14, before the Planning and Zoning Board Commission on June 26, 2014, pursuant to due and proper legal notice th having been published in the Daily Herald Newspaper on the 11 day of June, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-17-14; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Text Amendments would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: Section 14.604 Land Use Tables" of Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting Mini-Warehouse as permitted use in both the I-1 (Limited Industrial) and I-3 (Solid Waste Hauling) zoning districts. SECTION THREE: Section 14.2224Off-Street Parking Require of Chapter 14 as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting Mini-Warehouse to the Industrial section of, Table of Off Street Parking Requirements which shall read as follows: Use Parking Requirements Industrial: Mini-Warehouse 0.14 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, plus 1 space per vehicle used in the conduct of the business (Office SECTION FOUR: Section 14.2401Definitions, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting Mini-Warehouse and definition which shall read as follows: Ch. 14, Text AmendmentsZoning Page 2/2 -WAREHOUSE: a storage or warehousing service within a building for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise elsewhere. But in no case may storage spaces in a mini-warehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale, business or service use. Spaces may not be used for workshops, hobby shops, manufacturing or similar uses. Human occupancy is limited to that required to transport, arrange and maintain store SECTION FIVE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 2014. ______________________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\files\WIN\ORDINANC\Text Amend Ch 14zoningpz-17-14july2014 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM 1 li TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 27, 2014 SUBJECT: PZ -14 -141 MT.PROSPECT PLAZA 1 CONDITIONAL USES & VARIATION The Petitioner proposes to construct two (2) new outlot buildings totaling 11,800 square feet. Per the attached site plan, one of the outlot buildings would. include a drive - through and be located along Rand Road. The second outlot building would be located to the northeast of the existing Chase Bank. Conditional Use approval is required for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) in order to construct the two (2) new outlot buildings and have a drive - through establishment. The Subject Property currently does not conform to the overall lot coverage permitted. The Plat of Survey indicates the existing lot coverage measures approximately eighty -eight and one half (88.5) percent, when a maximum of seventy -five (75) percent is permitted. The proposed improvements include adding landscaping, which would reduce the overall lot coverage to approximately eighty -six (86) percent. The Petitioner seeks Variation approval to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty -six (86) percent. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, June 26, 2014, and by a vote of 7 -0, recommended approval of the following motions: A. Conditional Use fora Final Planned Unit Development; B. Conditional Use for a Drive - Through Establishment; and C. Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty -six (86) percent, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Development. of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., dated 4/18/2014; 2. Development of the outlot buildings in general conformance with the building elevations prepared by Wah.Yee Associates, dated 04110 /2014. Color schemes for buildings shall match those of existing buildings; 3. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by 3D Design Studio, dated 06125114, but revised to provide evergreen plant material along Westgate Road and the drive - through; 4. Development of the site in general conformance with the photometric plan prepared by Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., dated 411812014; 5. Submittal of fixture cut - sheets for exterior lights that comply with Village Code; 15 f1%vhLW$\PLAW1l i ing & Zoning COMMT&Z 2014VAET McmoOZ -1444 Mt. Prospect P]m (CUs & VARJAd x PZ -14 -14 June 27, 2014 Page 2 6. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings for review and approval by the Village. The engineering drawings shall include all site work including utilities, storm water detention, and associated improvements; 7. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code regulations, lighting regulations, Sign Code regulations; and building regulations; and 8. Issuance of a building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village Board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. A revised landscape plan is also attached. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their July 15, 2014 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter: I 1� William J. Cooney, Jr., ICP ❑Vf1%vh1hcdS5PLANT1anning @Zoning COMM\P&Z 20140M Me[noAPZ -14 -14 M4 PnxNcl Piwa (CUs & VAK).doon A Subsidiary of Ramco- Cershenson Properties Trust (NYSE: RPT) W, RAMCO GE RSHENSON I 1NcoRPc1RATED June 30, 2014 Mr. Bill Cooney Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Re: PZ- 14- 14 /Mt. Prospect Plaza Ramco- Gershenson, Inc. Request to Waive Second Reading Dear Mr. Cooney: 31500 Northwestern Highway Suite 300 Farmington Hills, M148334 248- 350 -9900 Phone 248 - 350 -9925 Fax Please accept this letter as our official request to waive the second reading of the ordinance as per the letter dated June 27, 2014 from Consuelo Andrade, Village of Mount Prospect Senior Planner. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 248.592.6326. Sincerely, Ross S. Gallentine Project Manager RSG /lw Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -14 -14 LOCATION: Mount Prospect Plaza (990 -1145 Mt. Prospect Plaza, 940 -950 E. Rand Road, 1200 -1220 E. Central Road) PETITIONER: Ramco- Gershenson Properties, L.P. OWNER: Ramco - Gershenson Properties, L.P. PARCEL #: 03 -35 -301- 057/056/055, 03 -35- 302 - 015/014 LOT SIZE: 32.24Acres (1,404,187 square feet) ZONING: B -3 Community Shopping LAND USE: Shopping Center REQUESTS: 1) Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development; 2) Conditional Use for a Drive - Through Establishment; and 3) Variation to the Overall Lot Coverage. {r LOCATION MAP J . }w � f I ! Ff % � + ..ate• y _C�. ! � - f' �• R l Y r> Ir 'w AM p „ a w' Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prix�c Community Development Department MEMORANDUM v l $j TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON FROM: CONSUELO ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: JUNE 16, 2014 HEARING DATE: JUNE 26, 2014 SUBJECT: PZ- 14 -14/ CONDITIONAL USES AND VARIATION / MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the June 26, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Ramco- Gershenson Properties, L.P. (the "Petitioner ") regarding the property known as Mount Prospect Plaza (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking Conditional Uses for a Final Planned Unit Development and for a drive- through establishment and Variations to the overall lot coverage. The P &Z hearing was properly noticed in the June 11, 2014 edition of the Daily Herald Newspaper. In addition, the Petitioner has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and Staff posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the north side of Central Road, just east of Mt. Prospect Road, and is zoned B3 Community Shopping District. The Subject Property consists of a shopping center and four (4) outlot buildings. It is bordered by the B -3 Community Shopping District and R -5 Senior Citizen Residence District to the north, B- 3 Community Shopping District to the west, the R -1 Single - Family Residence to the east, and B -4 Corridor Commercial, B -3 Community Shopping District and Des Plaines to the south. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner proposes to construct two (2) new outlot buildings totaling 11,800 square feet. Per the attached site plan, one outlot building (Building G) would be located along Rand Road and measure 2,000 square feet in area. Building G would be a drive - through establishment. The second outlot building (Building F) would be located to the northeast of the existing Chase Bank outlot building. Conditional Use approval is required for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) in order to construct the two (2) new outlot buildings and have a drive - through establishment. Site Plan — The proposed outlot buildings would be served via the existing access drives located on Central and Rand Roads. The Plat of Survey indicates the existing overall lot coverage measures approximately eighty -eight and one half (88.5) percent, which is nonconforming as the overall lot coverage permitted is seventy -five (75) percent. The proposed site plan indicates additional landscaping would be added reducing the overall lot coverage to approximately eighty-six (86) percent. The Petitioner seeks Variation approval to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty -six (86) percent. PZ -14 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 26, 2014 Page 3 Building Elevations — The attached building elevation drawings illustrate the new outlot buildings would be constructed out of split face CMU, face brick, and EIFS. The elevations would include metal awnings and canopies. Parking — Based on Sec. 14.2224 of the Zoning Code, the parking requirement for the overall PUD would be four (4) spaces per one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor. Therefore, the proposed PUD would require a minimum 1,251 parking spaces. The site plan indicates the proposed development would provide 1,416 parking spaces, including thirty-four (34) accessible parking spaces. The parking provided will exceed the number of required parking spaces by one hundred and sixty -five (165) parking spaces. Landscaping -The attached landscape plan illustrates the proposed plantings for the development. Lighting - The Petitioner submitted a photometric plan that indicates parking lot lighting would be provided. Fixture cut sheets were not provided for the proposed lighting. The Petitioner is not seeking relief from the Village's lighting regulations and will be required to comply with Sections 14.314 and 14.2219 of the Zoning Code. Signage - The Petitioner's drawings indicate the location of possible signs. The proposed signs will be subject to compliance with the Village Sign Code's regulations and will require a sign permit. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS Building Division — A complete building code analysis, including but not limited to egress, height, area, use, and fire rating analysis, will be required for the proposed development. Fire Department — An egress plan including, occupant loads, travel distances, egress widths, and common path of travel distances, will be required for the proposed outlot buildings when the building plans are submitted for review. Fire sprinkler systems in accordance with NFPA 13 will be required. Fire sprinkler shop drawings, hydraulic calculations, and equipment cut sheets will be required at time of building permit plan submittal. Fire alarm systems will be required. Fire alarm shop drawings with point to point wiring diagrams, battery load calculations, and equipment cut sheets will be required to be submitted for review. Additional fire hydrants may be required for this project. Hydrants shall be provided around the perimeter of the building at maximum two hundred - fifty (250) feet spacing measured along access roads. Such hydrants shall be installed not more than fifty (50) feet or less than twenty -five (25) feet from the building. A fire hydrant must be provided within one hundred (100) feet of the fire connection. Engineering Division - The Utility Plan shows the existing water main to be relocated around the new building. The exact location of the relocation, as well as the associated easement requirements, will be reviewed as part of the permit review process. (The relocated water main is too close to the new building, and the existing water main to remain may be too close to the proposed detention pond.) Also, both the larger building and the new detention pond are shown to be located over the water service for Charter One Bank. This service will have to be relocated as part of the proposed development without disrupting service to the bank. The drive -thru will have to be modified to discourage two -way traffic along the south side of the building. These requirements are included as part of the Staff Report in an effort to ensure the Petitioner is aware of the requirements and submits the necessary documentation at time of building permit submittal. A thorough review of the site and details will be performed when the plans are submitted for permit. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as Community Commercial. This land use designation is appropriate for a wide range of uses and developments ranging from large scale, such as big box, to PZ -14 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 26, 2014 Page 4 small scale, such as outlot buildings. The proposed improvements would be consistent with this designation and is appropriate for the area. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for approving a Planned Unit Development are listed in Section 14.504 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Planned Unit Development. These standards relate to: • The proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is to be located; • The principal use in the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the recommendations of the comprehensive plan of the village for the area containing the subject site; • The proposed planned unit development is in the public interest and is consistent with the purposes of this zoning ordinance. • That the streets have been designed to avoid inconvenient or unsafe access to the planned unit development and for the surrounding neighborhood; and that the development does not create an excessive burden on public parks, recreation areas, schools, and other public facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned unit development. Per the Petitioner's application, the proposed outlot buildings, including the drive - through, would be compatible with the existing shopping center and other commercial property in the immediate vicinity. The proposed improvement would only improve the Subject Property and bring it closer to compliance with the overall lot coverage. The Petitioner further indicates the proposed outlot buildings would utilize the existing ingress and egress. Staff is supportive of the Conditional Use requests for a PUD in order to construct two (2) oulot buildings, including a drive - through, as it would be compatible with the underlying B3Community Shopping District and the Village's Comprehensive Land Use Map. Further, the development would be compatible with the surrounding commercial areas along Rand Road. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: • Would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection ofthe public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty six (86) percent. Per Petitioner, the Subject Property was developed prior to the Village Code's restriction on overall lot coverage. The proposed improvements would reduce the existing nonconforming lot coverage by two (2) percent. Staff is supportive of the Variation request as the Petitioner is proposing to improve the Subject Property by adding additional landscaping and reducing the overall lot coverage. Reducing the overall lot coverage down to seventy -five (75) percent would have a negative impact on the parking provided. The Variation request will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property. PZ -14 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 26, 2014 RECONIMENDATION Page 5 Staff finds that the request for a Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development and a drive - through, and Variation to the overall lot coverage meet the standards for these requests as listed in the Zoning Code and that granting such requests would be in the best interest of the Village. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motions: "To adopt staff findings in the staff report as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of A. A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development; B. A Conditional Use for a Drive - Through Establishment; and C. Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty-six (86) percent, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., dated 4/18/2014; Development of the outlot buildings in general conformance with the building elevations prepared by Wah Yee Associates, dated 04/10/2014. Color schemes for buildings shall match those of existing buildings; 3. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by 3D Design Studio, dated 04/18/2014; 4. Development of the site in general conformance with the photometric plan prepared by Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., dated 4/18/2014; Submittal of fixture cut - sheets for exterior lights that comply with Village Code; Submittal of final civil engineering drawings for review and approval by the Village. The engineering drawings shall include all site work including utilities, storm water detention, and associated improvements; Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code regulations, lighting regulations, Sign Code regulations; and building regulations; and A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: �k�l �� William J. Cooney, AIC , Director of Community Development H: \PLAMPIanning & Zoning CON W&Z Zo 14lStaff Mpods\PZ -II -IJ Mt Prospect Pl= (CUs -Firal PUD. Drive - Through. VAR- La( Co—ge) docx MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -14 -14 Hearing Date: June 26, 2014 PROPERTY ADDRESS: Mount Prospect Plaza (990 -1145 Mt. Prospect Plaza, 940- 950 E. Rand Road, 1200 -1220 E. Central Road) PETITIONER: Ramco - Gershenson Properties, L.P, PUBLICATION DATE: June 11, 2014 PIN NUMBERS: 03 -35 -301- 057/056/055, 03 -35- 302 - 015/014 REQUESTS: 1) Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development 2) Conditional Use for a Drive - Through Establishment; and 3) Variation to the Overall Lot Coverage MEMBERS PRESENT: Agostino Filippone Thomas Fitzgerald William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chairman MEMBERS ABSENT: Sharon Otteman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Laurence Freidman, Fred Zantello, Walter Graft, Ross Gallentine Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Commissioner Youngquist made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Beattie to approve the minutes of the May 22, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 7 -0. After hearing three (3) additional cases Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ- 14 -14, Mount Prospect Plaza. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner for PZ -14 -14 is seeking Conditional Uses for a Final Planned Unit Development and for a drive through establishment and a Variation to the overall lot coverage for the property known as Mount Prospect Plaza. Ms. Andrade stated that the Subject Property is located on the north side of Central Road, just east of Mt. Prospect Road, and is zoned B3 Community Shopping District. She further explained the Subject Property consists of a shopping center and four (4) outlot buildings. It is bordered by the B -3 Community Shopping District and R -5 Senior Citizen Residence District to the north, B -3 Community Shopping District to the west, the R -1 Single - Family Residence to the east, and B -4 Corridor Commercial, B -3 Community Shopping District and Des Plaines to the south. Planning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -14 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade explained that the Petitioner proposes to construct two (2) new outlot buildings totaling eleven thousand eight hundred (11,800) square feet. She further stated, per the site plan one of the outlot buildings would be a drive - through establishment located along Rand Road and measure approximately 2,000 square feet in area. The second proposed outlot building would be located to the northeast of the existing Chase Bank. She explained that a Conditional Use approval is required for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) in order to construct the two (2) new outlot buildings and have a drive - through establishment. Ms. Andrade stated the proposed outlot buildings would be served via the existing access drives located on central and rand roads. The plat of survey indicates the existing overall lot coverage measures approximately eighty-eight and one half (88.5) percent, which is nonconforming as the overall lot coverage permitted is seventy-five (75) percent. The proposed site improvements would include additional landscaping which would reduce the overall lot coverage to approximately eighty-six (86) percent.The petitioner is seeking a variation to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty-six (86) percent. In regards to parking, Ms. Andrade stated the zoning code requires four (4) spaces per one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. Therefore, the proposed PUD would require a minimum of one thousand two hundred and fifty one (1,251) parking spaces. Ms. Andrade further explained the site plan indicates the proposed development would provide one thousand four hundred and sixteen (1,416) parking spaces, including thirty-four (34) accessible parking spaces. The parking provided will exceed the minimum required. Ms. Andrade stated the proposed building elevations indicates the two (2) new outlot buildings would be constructed out of split face CMU, face brick, and EIFS. The elevations would include metal awnings and canopies. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner submitted a revised landscape plan on June 25` that indicates landscaping would be provided for the new outlot buildings, new parking lot islands, and along the Westgate Road property line. Per the revised plan, new landscape screening would be provided along Westgate road in order to screen the parking lot from the residential located across the street. The plan indicates shade trees and shrubs would be provided to cover over 75% of the parking lot frontage along Westgate. Ms. Andrade summarized the standards for approving a Planned Unit Development as: The proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is to be located; The principal use in the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the recommendations of the comprehensive plan of the village for the area containing the subject site; That the streets have been designed to avoid inconvenient or unsafe access to the planned unit development and for the surrounding neighborhoods. Per the Petitioner's application, Ms. Andrade stated the proposed outlot buildings, including the drive - through, would be compatible with the existing shopping center and other commercial property in the immediate vicinity. Ms. Andrade further explained the proposed improvement would improve the Subject Property and bring it closer to compliance with the overall lot coverage. The Petitioner further indicates the proposed outlot buildings would utilize the existing ingress and egress. Planning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -14 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade stated that staff is supportive of the conditional use requests for a Planned Unit Development in order to construct two (2) oulot buildings, including a drive - through, as it would be compatible with the underlying B3 Community Shopping District and the Village's comprehensive land use map. Further, the development would be compatible with the surrounding commercial areas along Rand Road. In regards to the Variation, Ms. Andrade summarized the standards for Variation as: • Would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty six (86) percent. Per the Petitioner, the proposed additional landscaping would reduce the existing nonconforming lot coverage by two (2) percent. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff is supportive of the Variation request as the Petitioner is proposing to improve the Subject Property by adding additional landscaping and reducing the overall lot coverage. The Variation request will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property. Ms. Andrade stated that the Staff finds the Petitioner's request will satisfy the standards listed in the zoning code and would be in the best interest of the Village. She stated that Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motions: "To adopt staff findings in the staff report as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of: A. A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development; B. A Conditional Use for a Drive - Through Establishment; and C. Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty -six (86) percent, subject to the conditions of approval listed in the staff report" Ms. Andrade finally stated the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Commissioner Beattie asked if there are specific zoning requirements for drive - through facilities. Ms. Andrade stated there is a regulation in regards to stacking vehicles in a drive - through in which the proposed project complies. Chairman Donnelly asked if the menu board for the drive - through establishment could be screened by landscaping because it faces the street. Ms. Andrade stated that the landscaping plan indicates screening. Chairman Donnelly swore in Laurence Freidman, 77 W. Washington Street Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Freidman stated he is the attorney for the applicant. Planning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -14 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Mr. Freidman stated that Mount Prospect Plaza is the second largest shopping center in the Village and that his client is seeking to construct two additional outlot buildings with a drive - through which will create approximately 11,800 square feet of additional leasing space. Mr. Freidman explained the need for the Variation in order to allow the eighty -six (86) percent lot coverage. He further explained that introducing the new landscape plan will decrease the lot coverage by two (2) percent from current conditions. Mr. Freidman stated that a number of representatives from the project team are present who can answer questions from the board. Commissioner Beattie asked if the Petitioner has specific tenants to occupy the proposed outlot buildings. Chairman Donnelly swore in Fred Zantello (Vice President of Randco - Gershenson) 31500 Northwestern Highway Suite 530 Farmington Hills, Michigan. Mr. Zantello stated that there has been a lot of leasing inquiries for the shopping center. He further explained with the increase in interest his company feels there aren't enough opportunities available at the site. Mr. Zantello stated they don't have specific tenants designated for the additional buildings but believes they won't have an issue filling the spaces. Chairman Donnelly asked how long the project would take if the requests get passed. Mr. Zantello stated as soon as they have a positive recommendation for the project they are ready to start the building process. Chairman Donnelly asked what the overall lot coverage would be if they eliminated the surplus of parking spaces. Mr. Zantello stated he didn't know what the overall lot coverage would be if the surplus of parking were to be eliminated. He further explained that they have worked with Staff to help bring down the percentage of overall lot coverage. Mr. Zantello stated that there were still some leases that with the current tenants that include a specific higher amount of spaces per one thousand (1,000) square feet. There was general discussion between the board and Petitioner regarding the possibility of decreasing the amount of parking spaces in order to get closer to the maximum lot coverage. Mr. Simmons stated once the variation is approved it will run with the land and if the Petitioner decided to do any additional work to the property or amend the PUD they would have to go back through the zoning process for approval. However, the lot coverage variation would stay applicable to the land. Commissioner Youngquist asked if the Petitioner was comfortable with the orientation of the larger building because there wasn't much exposure to either Central or Rand Roads. Mr. Zantello stated they had proposed another location for the building in their submittal; however, Staff thought it would be more appropriate to locate the building in the current location on the plans. Hearing no other questions for the Petitioner, Chairman Donnelly opened the discussion up to the public. Planning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -14 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Chairman Donnelly swore in Holly Listopad from 107 N. Westgate Road Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Listopad stated she was there on behalf of the residents of Westgate Road located directly behind the shopping center. Ms. Listopad read a letter signed by various residents stating their concerns about the additions and proposed changes to the shopping center. She further stated the landscaping that separates the center from residential area has deteriorated over the years and is in need of repair. Ms. Listopad further expressed her concerns about the noise levels that come from the Walgreens air conditioning units. She asked if it was possible to add more landscaping there in order to help cancel out some of the noise. Chairman Donnelly asked Staff if the landscape plan provided includes some of the resident's requests. Ms. Andrade stated the landscape plan included plantings of shade trees and shrubs along the Westgate side of the property. She further stated the plan didn't specify what type of trees and shrubs would be planted. Chairman Donnelly swore in Craig Most 380 Pierce Court Vernon Hills, Illinois. Mr. Most stated currently they're planning on planting Evergreens and some deciduous bushes along the Westgate property line. He stated plant material will not give much relief to the noise level but will help it look more aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Beattie asked if there are any other options to help create a barrier. Mr. Most stated one option would to be to plant Evergreen trees on the property line as opposed to within the property. Mr. Simmons stated they are also proposing to install landscaping islands along the Walgreens building which will add additional layers to the screening. Chairman Donnelly swore in Ross Gallenstine 31500 Northwestern Highway, Farmington Hills, Michigan. Mr. Gallenstine stated the asphalt runs right up to the property line by the Walgreens establishment. He stated they are planning on getting rid of the parking along the property which will create ten feet of area where the landscaping will be added. Mr. Gallenstine further stated that is not enough room to berm and if they remove any additional parking it will affect the parking requirement. Chairman Donnelly swore in Nile Little, 3 North Westgate Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Little stated he is the first house on Westgate off of Central and is concerned with the increased traffic at the site. Planning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -14 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Mr. Little stated the delivery trucks are using Westgate to enter the shopping center to make deliveries because the parking lot has become so crowded with patrons. Mr. Little asked if the truck entrance could be removed off of Westgate to help fix the problem. Commissioner Filippone inquired about creating a new traffic pattern for delivery trucks entering and exiting the site by creating an entrance off of East Central Road. Chairman Donnelly swore in Walter Graft 850 Forest Edge Drive. Mr. Graft stated that there would be an issue with placing a driveway at the southeast corner because it would be too close to the Westgate Road entrance. Commissioner Fitzgerald asked if the Westgate entrance can be narrowed so bigger trucks won't be able to use that entrance. Mr. Zantello stated they don't own Walmart nor do they have anything to do with their operations. He stated he understands the resident's concern about using the residential road as an access point for the semi - trucks and is willing to discuss with Staff some option to help fix the problem. Mr. Simmons stated that the Petitioner and Staff can discuss options to the Westgate Road entrance before the Village Board meeting. There was general discussion between the board, Petitioner, and resident regarding how trucks drive through the Westgate entrance. Mr. Zantello stated they will have to get the Fire Department's input regarding narrowing the Westgate entrance. He feels it could be potentially dangerous for direct access to the back of the center is eliminated. He stated he feels it should be more of an enforcement issue. There was general discussion regarding the enforcement of trucks utilizing Westgate and the difficulty of removing a driveway as an access point to the shopping center. Mr. Freidman stated that nothing can be finalized at the meeting, but he and his client will work with Staff to come up with some potential solutions before the Village Board meeting. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any additional citizens to be heard, hearing none, he closed the public portion of the meeting and brought the discussion back to the board. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Fitzgerald to approve the following motion: "To adopt staff findings in the staff report as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of: A. A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development; B. A Conditional Use for a Drive - Through Establishment; and C. Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty -six (86) percent, subject to the conditions of approval listed in the staff report" Planning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -14 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Youngquist, Kueter, Mizwicki, Filippone, Fitzgerald, Beattie, Donnelly NAYS: NONE The vote was approved 7 -0 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. After hearing three (3) additional cases Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Youngquist and the meeting was adjourned at 9:11 pm, +01 - - � - MOA- -- oder, Administrative Assistant nily Development Planning and Zoning Commission- June 26, 2014 PZ -14 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL l: LOT 1 (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARTS THEREOF TAKEN FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS BY CONDEMNATION REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER LR- 3201616, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF TAKEN FOR CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION BY PLAT REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER LR- 3202476) IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ON JULY 16, 1979 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION AFORESAID DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT l; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RAND ROAD AS DEDICATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, A DISTANCE OF 296.41 (RECORD 297.66) FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON A TANGENTIAL CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,072.46 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 730 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 615.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED FEBRUARY 11, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION AFORESAID, 234.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 832.35 (RECORD 832.55) FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL ONE ABOVE ALSO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, BY METES AND BOUNDS, AS FOLLOWS: PART OF LOT 1, PLAZA SUBDIVISION, IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEST GATE ROAD AND EAST CENTRAL ROAD; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 813.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 419.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 33 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, 35.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 120.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, 35.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 38.52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,072.46 FEET AND A LONG CHORD SUBTENDED BEARING OF NORTH 53 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, 252.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 12 SECONDS EAST, 615.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, 698.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES O1 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST, 123.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, 416.97 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET AND A LONG CHORD SUBTENDED BEARING OF SOUTH 78 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 16.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, 135.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, 24.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, 1,111.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL ONE FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, PARKING OR MOTOR VEHICLES, LOADING AND UNLOADING OF COMMERCIAL AND OTHER VEHICLES, AND FOR THE USE OF ROADWAYS, WALKWAYS, AND FACILITIES INSTALLED FOR THE COMFORT AND CONVENIENCE OF CUSTOMERS, INVITEES, LICENSEES, TENANTS AND EMPLOYEES OF ALL BUSINESSES AND OCCUPANTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AS GRANTED BY EASEMENTS AND COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING LAND DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1990 BY AND BETWEEN MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND WAL -MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF DEEDS OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1990 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 90474272, OVER AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED "WAL -MART PARCEL" AS DEFINED THEREIN DESIGNATED AS PARKING AREAS: THAT PART OF LOT 1 (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARTS THEREOF TAKEN FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY CONDEMNATION REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3201616, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF TAKEN FOR CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION BY PLAT REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476) IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON JULY 16, 1979, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT l; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RAND ROAD AS DEDICATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, A DISTANCE OF 296.41 (RECORD 297.66) FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON A TANGENTIAL CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,072.46 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 730 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 615.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED FEBRUARY 11, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION AFORESAID, 234.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 832.35 (RECORD 832.55) FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL ONE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL SUBSURFACE LINES AND CONDUITS FOR WATERMAINS, SANITARY SEWER LINES, STORM SEWERS AND RELATED ACCESSORY FACILITIES, TOGETHER WITH ALL SURFACE STORM WATER DETENTION AREAS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RETENTION PONDS EXISTING OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED, AS GRANTED BY EASEMENTS WITH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING LAND DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1990 BY AN BETWEEN MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND WAL -MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF DEEDS OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1990 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 90474272, OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THOSE PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED "WAL -MART PARCEL" AS DEFINED THEREIN DESIGNATED AS UTILITY EASEMENT AREA AS DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "E" THERETO: THAT PART OF LOT 1 (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARTS THEREOF TAKEN FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY CONDEMNATION REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3201616, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF TAKEN FOR CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION BY PLAT REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476) IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON JULY 16, 1979, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT l; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RAND ROAD AS DEDICATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, A DISTANCE OF 296.41 (RECORD 297.66) FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON A TANGENTIAL CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,072.46 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 730 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 615.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED FEBRUARY 11, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION AFORESAID, 234.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 832.35 (RECORD 832.55) FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Standards for Conditional Use Approval Request for Conditional Use for Planned Development for Mt. Prospect Plaza Applicant currently is the owner and operator of Mt. Prospect Plaza, a community shopping center, with in excess of 300,000 s.q.f. of building area. Applicant is proposing that the entire shopping center be granted a conditional use for planned development, and in conjunction therewith, Applicant proposes to construct 11,800 s.q.f. of additional retail space in two buildings, one of which will have drive -thru service. Applicant's request for approval meets the applicable standards as follows: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The approval of the conditional use and the construction of the additional retail space will be compatible with the existing shopping center, and as indicated by the plans for such improvements, will not be detrimental to, nor endanger to the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located. The uses of other property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property are commercial in nature, and inasmuch as the proposed use will further improve and modify the existing shopping center, the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood in which the property is located. 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Surrounding properties have already been improved with uses which are compatible to the existing community shopping center use, and as such the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal or orderly development and improvement to the surrounding properties for the uses permitted in the district. 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and /or necessary facilities have been or will be provided. Adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have already been provided to service the existing shopping center and are more than adequate to service the existing shopping center as contemplated to be improved. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The existing shopping center has adequate ingress and egress to public streets which have already been designed to minimize traffic congestion and the proposed improvements to the existing shopping center will be more than adequately served by such existing ingress and egress which will minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village. Inasmuch as the use of the subject property as a community shopping center is not being changed, the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan remain in compliance and unchanged. 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. As indicated by the proposed improvement plans submitted in support of Applicant's request, the conditional use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which the property is located. Standards for Variations Request for Variation to Permit Lot Coverage to Exceed 75% of Total Land Area for Mt. Prospect Plaza Shopping Center Mt. Prospect Plaza Shopping Center was constructed prior to enactment of the requirement that lot coverage in the B3 Zoning District not exceed 75% of total land area. In fact the existing center currently provides for lot coverage in excess of 88 %. As part of the proposed improvements to the shopping center, Applicant intends to add additional landscaping which will reduce the total lot coverage by approximately an additional 2 %. Applicant meets the proposed standards for variations as follows: 1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations was to be applied. Inasmuch as the current shopping center improvements constitute a legally non- conforming use with respect to lot coverage, and inasmuch as the proposed improvements will in fact reduce the amount of lot coverage, if the strict letter of the regulations were to be applied, Applicant would suffer specific hardship by being denied the opportunity to improve its property in a manner, which although not meeting the 75% requirement, would in fact be reducing the current lot coverage from approximately 88% to approximately 86 %. 2. The conditions upon which an application for a variation are based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other property within the same zoning classification. The current condition of the subject property as legally non - conforming with respect to the lot coverage requirements of the Village is a condition which is not generally applicable to other property within the same zoning classification. 3. The purpose of the variation is not based primarily upon a desire to increase financial gain. The purpose of the variation is to further improve the shopping center by providing additional retail opportunities and by adding additional landscaping, to cause the property to be more compliant with the lot coverage requirements of the Village, such that the purpose of the variation is not based primarily upon the desire to increase financial gain. 4. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship in question is caused by the fact that the current improvements on the property are legally nonconforming because the 75% lot coverage requirement was created subsequent to the construction of the existing shopping center, and as such the condition which requires Applicant to seek the variation has not been created by any person presently having interest in the property. 5. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. The granting of the variation will allow the property to become more compliant with the current lot coverage requirements of the Village by the addition of additional landscaping to the shopping center, and will therefore be a benefit to the public welfare and not injurious to other property improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. 6. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The granting of the variation will allow the continued the use of the property for community shopping and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 7. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage or create drainage problems on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed variation will allow Applicant to proceed with its proposed improvements to the existing shopping center, including the addition of more landscaping, and as such will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage, or create drainage problems on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Mount Prospect Plaza Overall Landscape Improvements Plan 6.25.14 CENTENNIAL DRIVE . Ut tD C- CENTENNIAL DRIVE 4A i1G, ' 0 NEW RAIN GARDEN--' LANDSCAPE NEW FOUNDATION AND SITE LANDSCAPE NEW FOUNDATION AND SITE LANDSCAPE NEW LANDSCAPE SCREENING _IRAMCO GERSHENSON li T I 1 7 1z LO ASSOCIATES. INC. 4�6P Zdy,r),— 60061 -A4"14 h9,.. -T,1 947,4 A9,)1 O ■ 12 . ...... ­ 6 NEW PARKING LOT SHADE TREES EXISTING PARKWAY TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN NEW LANDSCAPE SCREENING (SHADE TREES AT —50' O.C. AND SHRUB PLANTINGS OVER 75% OF PARKING LOT FRONTAGE) NEW LANDSCAPE SCREENING (EVERGREEN AND ORNAMENTAL TREES) NEW LANDSCAPE SCREENING (EVERGREEN AND ORNAMENTAL TREES) EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISTING DETENTION AREA rW NONNI M NNNNNINI 60 120 MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA RETAIL DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS F & G VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS STANDARD SYMBOLS BIA/TBIA uoryI MEry. HOLI o I SW M11FOLE PROPOSED t —r-r —r e • e 11111 IFFILT IILI IFF"I e vw } III I—E ,., s,R��,�RE ELL�4ION s101TIll ELEIATION ` — 01TURE EL—T- SITE LOCATION 8�1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY, G FLT HA IATES. INC. _MOM NI LLS, ILLINOIS C 8006� SHEET INDEX 1. TITLE SHEET 2. OVERALL SITE PLAN 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS / DEMOLITION PLAN PROJECT LOCATION 4. GEOMETRIC PLAN , °,°°n. ����^°�° eooss S• UTILITY PLAN 4 + 6. GRADING PLAN E1,11 11,111,111 111-11-141 c °�° oo�," o,,,�n „�— s, -3�a, 11— Fl-­ F11111I Ill-111-III, OWNER, coMCan s�o-soo-s�sz o.. EE .. E ... iN 11 IN GTa - I—Al. -T oo N1C0re aas c�o-iee -z�sz EA, IQ 3so oo 9s PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ,� �►1 GEWALT HAMILTON TITLE SHEET ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE IMPROVEMENTS °�°°g mi 5SC Y bdg:D - V ,HIk, IL NKIL ^'^ ^ ^'°^ ° ^° ^ ° ^ ^ °'°^ ° ° ° ° ^° MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA 1 TFL �4 47A 97, I'll n47,- 47AA701 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS p � Qy ,�, re aia 4 av 6 a LOCATION MAP sl& n hiiiiiiiiii "1 p N GRAPHIC SCALE o� GEWALT HAMILTON OVERALL SITE PLAN ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE IMPROVEMENTS I� V m. Hi7Lz, IL. oDOeL ^ ° ^ ^'°^ ° ^° ^ ° ^ ^ °'°^ ° °° ° ^° MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA F" 47.4,�9rOC i.�a.4 " "�- 47a.970t VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS d` N ,d e d` x �. 1 l 8a GRAPHIC SCALE v \, A I A I A I d' i w 17 /. K \�Y d m s d / LEGEND .���. `1 x w CENTRAL ROAD ,�; /►1 GEWALT HAMILTON EXISTING CONDITIONS /DEMOLITION PLAN " ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE IMPROVEMENTS 3 SOF - El, I H71-, IL O061 ^ ° ^ ^'°^ ° ^° ^ ° ^ ^ °'°^ ° ° ° ° ^° MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA F" T : ;9700 F.la n4 ",- 47AA70t VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS a 6 w 2. }. 85 LF OF 4' ORANGE C ( a. �,� 6�p , \ I l J' FEN � _ I ✓ ` F� 9 LF O 4' ORANGE C) 'H. "�' \I� IF NEETEOTION 6 z ` m N 135 LF OF 4' ORANGE TREE , s N PROTECTION FENCE 1 n1 TREE REMOVAL (1) 4 M,d (2) 3" TREES .nom r u TREE REMOVAL (1)15" TREE I 4(1 LF OF 4' ORANGE TREE PROTECTION FENCE nsvHnL SU LF OF P ORANGE TREE PROTECTION 1 12 FENCE — DEFINED LIMITS FOR LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS �– TREE REMOVAL I I ^;v` H)3 "TREE `• 38 LF OF 4' \ s P O THE OT O TION ..� I FENCE TT TS LF OF 4' 3 I ORANGE THE PR ECTIO r FENCE , � Bl HE NC 1 1 ZUv CF v v 6 . Tree Protection and Removals Plan Retail Site F Fo 1 SCA F:1 "- 20'_0" 0 PH 4I 60 60 J Plant Da�Ta61e NOTES: 1. LAN OBCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THEE PIT DOES NOT HOLD WATER. 5 Two wimme� P1 TMI U-11— Tag nuirBer Nlreca gmesetl 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREE AT SF) Tag peikirg area Irrtedor larulsoepe (SRI 616 ELEVATION OF NURSERY SPADE L , 3. LAYOUT AS INDICATED ON THE PLANTING PLAN SELECTIVELY PRUNE TREE AFTER. INSTALLATION FOR O – SELECTIVELY PRUNE PEF.ENNIALS AFTER INSTALLATION FOR BEST APPEARANCE BEST APPEARANCE. REMOVE ALL 3JENEP. GROWTH AND C REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE GRO NH DEAD BRANCHES E' FINISH GRADE 2 v 3 MIN MULCH DEPTH AT BASE OF TREE, MULCH PING DIA AS INDICATED ON PLAN 7 - r 113 TOP501 L 3 A —POSTED MANURE OP. BED, MULCH BEDLAVOIITISIZING AS m T_j SA ) ER SHAPE PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE AT C INDI SAU CPLAN SAUCER ER SHAPE SHAPE PLANTING SOIL MI XTURE 1 T PE JIAETER of PLANTING BED CN PERIMETER OF M CH RING f11TH SPADE EDGE IL FINISH PADE y r F POOL BALL: C D IAOVE TOP il3 _ . 113 TOPSOIL IL SAND AND —POSTED STED MAN IRE F S 3 IT z ? ` U NRISTURBED S.IL ROIT r C u EMO O I.B GEE MAI REMAIN. CJT, PEEL E P.LAP AND PE SFP.OM - L_.. TREE BASE UNDISTURBED SOIL Tree Planting Detail DEPTH VITH TERRASORB MIXED IN BEDS MIN NDISTUFBED SOIL LAYOUT AS INDICATED ON THE PLANTING PLAN CATS NTS / LL / T EP / FEN 2 —TREE REMO' TREES Tree Protection and Removals Plan Retail Site F fr�� SCAI.F:1 "= 20'_8' 11�.�7d1 0 211 4(I 6(I 8n Mount Pa eot Plaza Plant Da�Ta61e R..iI SS1e F rall Reau'rem Two wimme� P1 TMI U-11— Tag nuirBer Nlreca gmesetl 21 (Irzludes 12ERnfln SF) Tag peikirg area Irrtedor larulsoepe (SRI 616 nw lamsoepe 1. s (1 Per fm sN t5% t (Plea a exlsflnll>. TREESTOU`AAIN I ❑ ❑ 521 ­1111 Beirun 0c»1!"I'll C yllc IF 6HF3D (54 )2231591 f64712241892FAA V w.311 i'o.com 1 11 w0.',BB {f d1 com N C o J . N � M O c G ❑ 1 El � AS NOTED 3D 4.1814 L 1 of 2 sheet(s) PLACE SHRUB IN CENTER OF PLANTING HOLE PLUMB VERTICALLY FOR BEST APPEARANCE ,SELECTIVE LYPRUNE ALL SHRUBS AFTER INSTALLATION FOR BEST APPEARANCE. FIEMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE GD—H AND ANCHE3 ' MULCH DEPTH WITHIN PLANTING BED, MULCH BED LAYOUT131ZIN1 AS INDICATED ON PLAN SELECTIVELY PRUNE PEF.ENNIALS AFTER INSTALLATION FOR BEST APPEARANCE SAUCER SHAPE PLANTING SOIL MI %T11F.E AT PERIMETER OF PLANTIN BED REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE GRO NH f E' FINISH GRADE AND DEAD MATERIAL 3 MIN MULCH DEPTH INITHIN PLANTING r 113 TOP501 L 3 A —POSTED MANURE OP. BED, MULCH BEDLAVOIITISIZING AS T_j MUBHRCOM COMPORT TO e IAINIMUM DEPTH WITH TEF.RA30RB APPLIED AS SPECIFIED INDI SAU CPLAN SAUCER ER SHAPE SHAPE PLANTING SOIL MI XTURE 1 T PE JIAETER of PLANTING BED CN \\ F POOL BALL: C D IAOVE TOP il3 FINISH SPADE 113 OP3OIL SAND AND COMPOSTED MAN RE SG ` U NRISTURBED S.IL `^ o MUSHROOM COMPORT TO 12 lAINIMUM LANDSCAPEC NTFA T PT INSTALLSHRUB(SITO REFLECT N.IRSERY GRADEHS) DEPTH VITH TERRASORB MIXED IN BEDS MIN NDISTUFBED SOIL LAYOUT AS INDICATED ON THE PLANTING PLAN LAYOUT AS INDICATED ON THE PLANTING PLAN S1TrubPTantingDetail PerennialPlanting+Detail SEALR: NTS SCMLL:NTS ❑ ❑ 521 ­1111 Beirun 0c»1!"I'll C yllc IF 6HF3D (54 )2231591 f64712241892FAA V w.311 i'o.com 1 11 w0.',BB {f d1 com N C o J . N � M O c G ❑ 1 El � AS NOTED 3D 4.1814 L 1 of 2 sheet(s) (8) BAD HARBOR n@,F \ \ E - 12 "OCR )GP,D -LOW SIIMAC�� T JUNIPER BAR HARBOR � GRO -LOW SUMAC JUNIPER / NIPER N T,�Ly�,\qII1l Z !/ •J III r E (30) HAPPY s) G -LOw SIT RETURNS DAYUL] IC., (1) Al1TlIMNTOLB GINKGO (5) ANNABELLE ` (8) KARL EDE .BEER E \(3) BAR EARBOR YDP.ANGEA GRA55 ` IUNI R ` s l( GREEN VE (4) GREEN (1)JAR NESE ; BOXN /OOD BOXW OOD " - d TP,EF (80j LILYTI RE f5)MA IC CAR ET rE (3J KARI (17) HA Pv 6 ��! A CRASS, RETURNSB LY F (5) GREEN GE i q • - f� ` BOX`NOOD 3)KARLbQER _ ! '` (T, MAGIC CAR ET A `` —H / SPIRAEA DE sss. 9J HAPPY PET z z i J 12 \ rR essoo (1 B) DWA7zFY-(T (18) HAPPY RETURNS DAY G 2 2° Y ''33333����� C O Fp 1t I si.�ch ARRONWOOD VIBURNUM (9)ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA ee ' Z,JJ c' (7) GRO Lnw eL URNUM TRASH ENCLOSURE T SEA GREEN JUNIPER. PPn M K (15) HENRY'S GARNET (1) JAPANESE T LAG 0�d .T, \ \ \ �® * ®® 5 W EETSPIRE (3) SWISS STONE PINE (38) NORTHERN SEA OATS SOUTHEP.N IRIS �\ V _, CA LOWER. ® % \® U e 9)RED DKE (9) RED C DKEBERRY (11) SPICE BUSH (2)RIVER BIRCH (,]`HAPPY RE IIRNSD \ �p (3B'. JOE PYE N /EED \ \ I \ \ 1ETnL E l (8) BAD HARBOR n@,F \ \ E - 12 "OCR )GP,D -LOW SIIMAC�� T JUNIPER BAR HARBOR � GRO -LOW SUMAC JUNIPER / NIPER N T,�Ly�,\qII1l Z !/ •J III r E (30) HAPPY s) G -LOw SIT RETURNS DAYUL] IC., (1) Al1TlIMNTOLB GINKGO (5) ANNABELLE ` (8) KARL EDE .BEER E \(3) BAR EARBOR YDP.ANGEA GRA55 ` IUNI R ` s l( GREEN VE (4) GREEN (1)JAR NESE ; BOXN /OOD BOXW OOD " - d TP,EF (80j LILYTI RE f5)MA IC CAR ET rE (3J KARI (17) HA Pv 6 ��! A CRASS, RETURNSB LY F (5) GREEN GE i q • - f� ` BOX`NOOD 3)KARLbQER _ ! '` (T, MAGIC CAR ET A `` —H / SPIRAEA DE sss. 9J HAPPY PET z z i J 12 \ rR essoo B (18) HAPPY RETURNS DAY LY O Fp 1t I si.�ch (T) ARF FORM` OD ee ' Z,JJ c' (7) GRO Lnw eL URNUM ' S leleutiv PPn M mNlol QadK (1) JAPANESE T LAG .EE QU ana' �. (,]`HAPPY RE IIRNSD ILY A (4) GREEN GE ^rr N uieglmr R Q rt n �.; \1a" (1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO (18) BEA GREEN JUNIPER BAP. HARBOR JUNIPER a BOXWOOD (3; KARL FOER OR ASS M (fl)GRO -E ll C BAR HAR \ R JUN R rm Cnaoia - ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA (8) MAGIC CAR SPIRAEA T. _3) t� R '�� * * (1) Si!199 PINE 1)` FO, Holz NGdiRE "eNMrrvame e U n'N iLOiN �- ]e HB (14) KARL FOERSTER GRASS SEA GREEN "Dwoe Pmm'e}mowrvao VtbWm:m 12) HAPP l3 35 "BB (8) JJN JUNIPER. L RNSDAY 6) RETURNS ( AR FOER LY u...tiMN'KU.e Po. Ts L'O .'� Q VIR UM ASS PN z "IJUC; &. D1 (5LA GIC CAR ET - (11 SWI55 STONE PINE - �� s SOD � �. SPIR AEA EN GE (4) GROKE ` UNIPER 13) S EA GRE EN J RED CH BERR, 12 " ❑ \ �• G L BOXWOOD ( A T LE P.EE LI (7NNABEL HYDRANGEA AC (7) (2)JAPANESE TREE LILAC (14) SEA GRE EN (15) © R JUNIPE GREEN VELVET \ \...,,,'�� r^. o }_ y ��.�. A,.yl H • ! (18) LET Z MIDGET BOXWOOD VITAE (12) CATMINT - (18) BAR HARBOR Tree Protection and Removals Plan - Retail Site P �/� f��L�d'1 '� ' ER (7)GRaLOW .UMA rvh 3CALB:1'= 20' -0" II 20 40 68 80 B,�L1)�NG � Y T11 Plant L'st UBF AMn' aDen "L Te Protection and Removals Plan- Retail Site P 0 1 4 11 1 "�211'_fl•' 0 20 9,1 60 60 LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL PLANT MATERIAL IS SUG. EST TO AVAILAGILm AND CORRECT SEASONAL PLANTING PROCEDURE Y NO ALL SUBSTITUTIINS REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ARITING O THE —NER S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ORDERING SUBSTITUTION ALL PLANT , SHALL RF EFWE MIN 4 DEPTH OF SHREDDED. HARDWOOD BARK MULCH H C VER IN PLANTING BED INCLUDING PERENNIAL PLANTINGS. HE LAND:,.,APE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE AND LAYOUT ALL INSTALLATIONS AND BEDS FOR APPROVAL BY O'NNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. FAILURE TO RECEIVE REVIEN AND APPROVAL MA BE CAUSE TO REQUIRE THEREMOVAL]F PLANTSANDREINSTALLATIONATN ADDITIONAL ^.OT 4. THE .. ^,ONTP.ACTOR SHALL SUPPLY LA NDS ^APE PLANTING SOIL MIT FOP. ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO CONSIST OF i!3-PSOIL, II3 SAND AND 113 GQ —TED MANURE OR'TAUSHROQM CQMP—'. THIS MIXTIIP.E IS TO BE ROTOTILLED INTO THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF e" THROUGHOUT THE B ER INSTALLATION MH AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. CONTRACTOR EST H ULO LSOW O RK INTO SOIL TERRA -BORB HD AT A RATE PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION ALL SHP.IIB AND NON- IRRIGATED TA NNIALEEDE. SUBMIT MANUFACTURERS LITERATURE FOR Pp "iA PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. AN Y DISTRBED AREAS NOT RE CEIVING ANY OTHER LANDSCAPE TR U EATMENT SHALL BE SEEDED N/ITH CLESENS SUNSHADE MIX )OR APPROVED EQUAL). SEE CIVIL FOR EROSION CONTROL!SEED BLANKET. 1 � 1 I F] , III NL11 LIh B 1 d L I"I IL MIL1) (59 )2231591 (14212251F92FAA V 911 i' e ,a,I ulo��.,�I�I .nsc,d;o �oal t N � v � b a AS NOTED 3D 4.1814 L2 of 2 sheet(s) B Lun>.inx si.�ch v�;wg. ee W1. - q.m eL ' S leleutiv PPn M mNlol QadK QU ana' ^rr N uieglmr rt n mn�,rh,,,;l,.rt IumFZa„hm:.p „�m!�f o p�iaelvyh rm Cnaoia M cCarryn' mm;apo u'ru "NLgI @COryr Holz NGdiRE "eNMrrvame Iiiu;a rcndenm!u Hea, Nfdgei" ie ]e HB "Dwoe Pmm'e}mowrvao VtbWm:m wnrfFOr l3 35 "BB QUANT 517E tT1ARK u...tiMN'KU.e Po. I�Py. w.�! PN z "IJUC; I�ly'•B T YT- 12 .11,11 LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL PLANT MATERIAL IS SUG. EST TO AVAILAGILm AND CORRECT SEASONAL PLANTING PROCEDURE Y NO ALL SUBSTITUTIINS REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ARITING O THE —NER S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ORDERING SUBSTITUTION ALL PLANT , SHALL RF EFWE MIN 4 DEPTH OF SHREDDED. HARDWOOD BARK MULCH H C VER IN PLANTING BED INCLUDING PERENNIAL PLANTINGS. HE LAND:,.,APE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE AND LAYOUT ALL INSTALLATIONS AND BEDS FOR APPROVAL BY O'NNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. FAILURE TO RECEIVE REVIEN AND APPROVAL MA BE CAUSE TO REQUIRE THEREMOVAL]F PLANTSANDREINSTALLATIONATN ADDITIONAL ^.OT 4. THE .. ^,ONTP.ACTOR SHALL SUPPLY LA NDS ^APE PLANTING SOIL MIT FOP. ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO CONSIST OF i!3-PSOIL, II3 SAND AND 113 GQ —TED MANURE OR'TAUSHROQM CQMP—'. THIS MIXTIIP.E IS TO BE ROTOTILLED INTO THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF e" THROUGHOUT THE B ER INSTALLATION MH AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. CONTRACTOR EST H ULO LSOW O RK INTO SOIL TERRA -BORB HD AT A RATE PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION ALL SHP.IIB AND NON- IRRIGATED TA NNIALEEDE. SUBMIT MANUFACTURERS LITERATURE FOR Pp "iA PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. AN Y DISTRBED AREAS NOT RE CEIVING ANY OTHER LANDSCAPE TR U EATMENT SHALL BE SEEDED N/ITH CLESENS SUNSHADE MIX )OR APPROVED EQUAL). SEE CIVIL FOR EROSION CONTROL!SEED BLANKET. 1 � 1 I F] , III NL11 LIh B 1 d L I"I IL MIL1) (59 )2231591 (14212251F92FAA V 911 i' e ,a,I ulo��.,�I�I .nsc,d;o �oal t N � v � b a AS NOTED 3D 4.1814 L2 of 2 sheet(s) LL144M N -A-11 SCALE LEGEND GEWAIT Mmigm GEOMETRIC PLAN ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE IMPROVEMENTS MO PROSPECT PLAZA VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 6 p.1 � I I _ � ' � 11 ������ _ _ I�� I � I■ ® �1131�� 1■I�� � i rig � i ® O o f AN, A w ,,AA 711, AII LI :. ILL Wl 'A III ° SOUTH ELEVATION A ALI,A.sr °F-:M 3�3a _�-0 2.1 BUILD 2NG PLAN _ _. 3 WEST ELEVATION 3 FACADE AREA CALCULATIONS .'e.195.F. Ae .r_130 cLS eRG_II[MV - 9645..^. GENERAL 1 4OTF5 emu. .. �N.v.cAN° r A r L. Nc�Aac ennrr cw� F.cn7evT.,. ` .IN >. ,..c uu sic rer� 111 All AwM,.��.�N �` � L�L]OMG]ii L?G30�pC�C�'� pLLa�LQ HOUmv JLLOa ©o@ I OWNER EVELOPER RA GER51EN30N ING, nnA;.oN�v rlek 5 3x00 NoR wF5TERN HW .. SUITE 300 --I—TON HILLS. `11CHIGNJ 483 4 R— 2. WAH YEEASSOCIATES concr�5°e 1 — \� 2.1 � Axc�+ lECTS a PIANneus 11-1 —A "°"•••.•'"" ,� vuoNL aos.v as rnx assn v "'"•" KEY PLAN o ,,, PRELIMINARY NO[FOR cAOOwcn�e�c0LIR a owc CONSTRUCTION y I I F -300 z_,, 5.1. I F -200 I I F -100 ' I � I I I I oe.0 S.uc w"nu �J I .,r�zrwnr cre�Ax.A I P I I I BUILD 2NG PLAN _ _. 3 WEST ELEVATION 3 FACADE AREA CALCULATIONS .'e.195.F. Ae .r_130 cLS eRG_II[MV - 9645..^. GENERAL 1 4OTF5 emu. .. �N.v.cAN° r A r L. Nc�Aac ennrr cw� F.cn7evT.,. ` .IN >. ,..c uu sic rer� 111 All AwM,.��.�N �` � L�L]OMG]ii L?G30�pC�C�'� pLLa�LQ HOUmv JLLOa ©o@ I OWNER EVELOPER RA GER51EN30N ING, nnA;.oN�v rlek 5 3x00 NoR wF5TERN HW .. SUITE 300 --I—TON HILLS. `11CHIGNJ 483 4 R— 2. WAH YEEASSOCIATES concr�5°e 1 — \� 2.1 � Axc�+ lECTS a PIANneus 11-1 —A "°"•••.•'"" ,� vuoNL aos.v as rnx assn v "'"•" KEY PLAN o ,,, PRELIMINARY NO[FOR cAOOwcn�e�c0LIR a owc CONSTRUCTION r I r _ r G -100 - w K , ZI P, i NORTH ELEVATION FACADE AREA CALCULATIONS h All c. Avn 1—use ull \� �ecnzoee�"wa� snn Fa..�c — rwmxo u -raL BUILDING PLAN ALC 3132 6 SOUTH ELEVATION 4 FACADE AREA CALCULATIONS LrS aPSa_nDVm =ICS Sr.l�ss %I GENERAL NOTES eu .w KEY PLAN EAST ELEVATION . - V L. FACADE AREA CALCULATIONS a Tv "T All ©a. ol:Ef^4rur L m -n `Aw�i�.ro WEST ELEVATION 3 FACADE AREA CALCULATIONS p� c�1 L DFIJJoTGOH�D 91� [00NIINFU 00000000 OOQ�1= l]< <F — L I , [P, E, I \ To) F, R` OWNER/DEVEL ER ; AMCO- 0EF- 5F -EN50N INC. 31500 NORMWE5 E� I-V Y.5-17 - =300 FAR"IIf\G FILL5. t•',!GHIG.MI �534 W AH YEE ASSOCIATES ARCH I E P LA NN ERS na "4B . W Pl l 11 -1 z r rWELV E MILH R M' TON MILS MCH G.� 3 E" a �� D,E.no, PRELIMINARY NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION CAD DWG A)6] COMRA 22 n- 10 -I —G 'A 2L9 N GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND WME n rr �mr V same .n• I I I I ar o- ' BARKING LOT " B 7!^ v Alg /Mlo Ma. /Mm Parking. Lot A 1.3 a 0.7 27 1.8 3.9 Q Parkin Lot 'B' 0.6 4.5 28 T1 xn,c. _ L— °Hmoue�rec PL. Mnv R R'_ uvary C�rvr"Mn�ory or [znrla - -Cl ev ovm[a. CFMRAL ROAD GEWAU MM1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ASSOCIATES I SITE IMPROVEMENTS P1 RiO R�rerrP { „ rnrr:d • \'emonlHlln, H_f,OFG1 °'wa ^ °•�° ^ ^ ° ^ ^'° ^°^°' ^ ° ^° MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA om ec TE_847.4]8.9]ao •Fwx 84].478.9"101 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS esnvrv,� �a /ie /,a >3o r 1 w GRAPHIC SCALE L a � III i CENTRAL ROAD GEWALT HAMILTON UTILITY PLAN ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE IMPROVEMENTS SOF Ed,: IV' V m. HiAI, IL O061 ^ ° ^ ^'°^ ° ^° ^ ° ^ ^ °'°^ ° ° ° ° ^° MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA T 47.4",; 9700 'Fl, F47 47x.9701 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS av 6 w N , s A s T GRAPHIC SCALE H4 4441H 0 m d Ay e � A s m to m r i � A. a �o r r � CENl1UL ROAD �� �►1 GEWALT HAMILTON GRADING PLAN " ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE IMPROVEMENTS SOF - E1:IE - V ,i, H71 -, IL. oDOeL ^ ° ^ ^'°^ ° ^° ^ ° ^ ^ °'°^ ° ° ° ° ^° MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA TF1 : 9700 F.la n4 ",- 47AA70t VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS a 6 w = j J ^ice iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiih b \ I III IrtTP - - -- ----- - - - - -- - -- EAST CENTRAL ROAD L eAsEsiTe AN CENTENNIAL DRIVE E— ALDI Vv ALGREENS DAI arc r, ACF 1<e111 F. MAJ E I - � F _ AVAIL111 Vnl VAJ D ii . ROSS DRESS FOR LESS O s �.xr. .r MPNJC d z BLE U d P J � a _ w IT I IT �N � � w z�o �o Total Prop,Lty A 32.24 acros e Existing Landscape Area 37I acres New Landscape Area= D_BJacres Total Landscape Area: 458 acres z New Coverage Ratio', 85.84'A 0 0 Vlgmfv.v, <P MOUNT PROSPECT IT tiL v ILE CENTENNIAL DRIVE E— ALDI Vv ALGREENS DAI arc r, ACF 1<e111 F. MAJ E I - � F _ AVAIL111 Vnl VAJ D ii . ROSS DRESS FOR LESS O s �.xr. .r MPNJC d z BLE U d P J � = j J ^ice iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiih b \ I III IrtTP EAST CENTRAL ROAD - - -- LEASE /SITE PLAN - CENTENNIAL DRIVE E— ALDI Vv ALGREENS DAI arc r, ACF 1<e111 F. MAJ E I - � F _ AVAIL111 Vnl VAJ D ii . ROSS DRESS FOR LESS O s �.xr. .r MPNJC d z BLE U d P J � a _ w IT I IT � � � w z�o �o Total Prop,Lty A 322' acros e Existing Landscape Area 37I acres New Landscape Area= D_BJacres Total Landscape Area: 458 acres z New Coverage Ratio', 85.8''A 0 0 Vlgmfv.v,« MOUNT PROSPECT L tiL v ILE w Q CENTENNIAL DRIVE E— ALDI Vv ALGREENS DAI arc r, ACF 1<e111 F. MAJ E I - � F _ AVAIL111 Vnl VAJ D ii . ROSS DRESS FOR LESS O s �.xr. .r MPNJC d z BLE U d P J � PLAT OF SURVEY LOT AREA AP AIJ ACTE .HURIE FEET APPLICABLE EASEMENTS AND SURVEY MATTERS o p 1etl Hereon s and does offect 11e , properII sup ect '� A 5.00 toot wlde Ga Maln Ensem cord July 16 191S os Document Numder 3106228. T s item ea plotted hereon and does Of— the AIIHIGI 11.111ty A ed July 16. er LR E 3 e s plotted EOSemenld tlaes offec ontdned u o sad at G11in the ri 9r 9 ht 9 ably re fi red s H E, , 1'A 'Ntnllal'on annd9Op 9 and does affect 1He udfecl p perlyHe Hereon V plotletl o-P z;z d u d 1 1 1, 1 and does o-N dlnnhet n nnwre and LET ones nffed me enure prnperiv. A 10.00 -F wide Electric and T e Ed,emenl recorded 952226. T is ease t 9 ree7nco item affects the prop y dle� tletermine iF tNs NOB en His s y the IocatlonE mdlcated In n the plat atlaMed ereto and made a e to d if lnis ble etermin nE l nem Off,- U, NO-A pGp,Fy, l o-" e r e t s pinuee hereon 2s and off- 1Fe B A D H d o- Janua'y I1 1 E 988 as Document Numder 1R 3680212 and ded Sept a he F t Num Her 37502111, prop y hereon ontl tlaes affect the s o- item �s A.11ed nand does ofleN ne ect p "N"FOLmber ° 19, v 1988 as Document LR le e U -1, e 32 s po Hereon and d— RIf- the sud,ecl prop o 30A A 20.00 loot wde Water MGInE e11 r orded Ma a , planed partlalof thiO p tM1e ct lomtfon tFls ilemn Item u see a /� A, property. 1308E n A May 1 J n I.— t. 1 ­FNIon At 111 , [111, THIN do, Cff,,t the ;9 ued ly A 20.00 fool m wide Sanilar Sew e EN ap enl r orded June 25. F s plotted nd @2 A fool vide El,E e and t he p n n p e e Easement recorded i s platted hereon and tlaes affect the , prop All, eoi N m s pIottZd Hereon HA Th r, and. does affect the I prop y e ON n tl No Agreement r 1e IR,I 1 lottetl Hereon and does off- Hh, 11Hr of 9 21 "B"tyls m s p o-° o- NnnHet n nnwre and does Affect me enure prop v Docorneol Numoer Doti 2510641 re e Rem Es of lolte h I TO nkel in nature and does affect the entire s �nd does NO Goer f i p np s platted Hereon do- E BASIS OF BEARINGS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAR, P"T rATEIE ER N NO VISA ISO .1 It AS AS 0 It 4 01 D . A I SENT NHH'ME, A0477M OF HOLES OF 1101 IIINTI, ILLINOIS ON ALI. EDIEPTIN. THEIEF— THAT DART I LOT 1 IN PLAZA B—ISIAMN AFAIIIII DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS 110 AABSOFD °s( F 'ONGAGE 2. ALONG BAD S11THESILERLI LINE ON A FAR SENT At .. E CE fie FE 89 DIN GR SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE. (RECORD 832.J5 ( ORD tt-52 S . ) ET FG THE 8 IIT GF BELYNNNG. PARCEL ONE ABOVE ORE DARTI11FARLV DESCRIBED. 11 METES AND BOUNDS. AS FOLLOWS. PART NOR ITH. COUNTI FRLLNOS P LAZA B F OLLOWS: B EGINNING AT THE ON ASP I N "TMST `IPNER ' I WEST IFTE A .. AN' 'AST OF NTRAL LOAD THENCE NORTH ED R— THEN E 54 A NOTES 11 SECONDS WEST, 10 FEET 'HENCE SOUTH " DEGREES 01 MINILES 12 PECAN IS WEST 3, AS FEET TEN, AS DEGREES 1� MINILEA 2A SECONDS SUIT. IS 12 FEEL. FIENCE BLIND TIE AID OF A STEVE TO FIE INIT TAGINA A 1BAIS F�ETON DE NC IT. S. 2 , 5 T 2 , 15 . FEET; THENCE BAD IS OF 40 00 FEET AND A LON G ' I ITBTENDED BEAR NO OF SOITH 71 DEGREES 41 EAST 111 FEET THENCE SOFT' " DEGREES " M`NUTE' 4' SECONDS EAST 24 " FEET BEGINNING NOR OILUBIOD EASEMENT III TIE 'ENEF I 'I 'A"EL ONE To' N"E" AND E ` BE BE PAID NO AREAS THAT DART OF LOT 1 fE"EEPTINO TH So TOW .I TPANSPIPTST ON FTNEREOFRE FAA BEGSTENED AS DOCUMENT NUMBE R 32 02471, IN PLAZA ILID-IN, BE NO A ELLADVISON OF PART IF THE SOUTHWEST CHAPTER I SECT ON . ILLINOIS L OIN JULY 11, 1929. PS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104771, DND ireECOLD`AA ') ° T To`A POIN ° T OF` GORVATo°e.`�H O F PLAZA ALONG `AD POUT`WE'TE­ LNE ON A TANGENTIAL A BAD US OF 2.072 CIE FEET. FOR AN AID DISTANCE IF 73. FEE I TIENCE N "1' 21 DEGREES MNUTTE, 'I SE—DA EAST, MIAI FEET I. TIE SOUTHWEST COSINE A A I CENTENNIAL A'. A 'S ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED FEBRIA11 11 lGlEl AS D OCUMEN I NUMBER 11RA471 THENIE N1111 11 DE11 ES 11 MINHILE1 31 1ECGNN1 EAST ALONG TIE SUIT LNE OF 'EN I END At eols SIFN F ME DEGREE A 'S ONUTTES 1, I ENIE SEST ALONG swD N TH INE OR. .11 31 [ DRD ai2.11) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3 I ON OCLUSIOD EASEMENT FOR TIE BENEFIT I PRIOEL ONE FOR INSTALLATION. MAINTENANCE. 'FORM WATER DETENTION AREA, INILIDIN., BUT NIT LIMITEG TO, RETENTION FINDS FOWLING ON I. BE CONSTRUCTED. AS GRANTED El E AIEMENT, WT` COVENANTS OND I DNA AND RE IR AT ON AFFECT NO LAN D DATED SEP RISE' 2' — Al AD BETWEEN ONDINTO POSPE OF PLAZA I I A TED I 11— IN CONRAD N TIE III IF OF TO E 'E'CDE, OF DEEDS OF 'GO' 1GLONTI, LLIN.11 ON SEPTEMBER 2 AS DOITHMENT I'M PER A 0474172 OVE ACID. SMART PARCEL' A DEFINED OHEREIN DESIGNATED AS LONDE1 THOSE FOR ON ' FIL EASEMEN AREA As HESC. RED G EDINI E TIEIETA . IN I PART OF LOT 1 (EZC OF TA So OF TRANSPORTATION A ITS LOW 0 RNEP AT SAID SEO D iFE oE1 E ` ALO ADIOS I OF 4 072 4' F To' AN FEET THENCE NORTH MIDDLE, ACCORDING I. TIE PLAT TNEIEOF 1E.ISTE1EA FEEIIA11 11 1S.1 AS DOI UMENT N—ER 3202475 THENIE N1111 11 DGER El 11 MINUTES 11 1ECONDI EAST ALONG TIE SUIT LNE I 'ENNENN At °I S" 8y e F "NIE NDRR FEErR ° NDS L vES, ALONG BAD NORTH I NE. 832,3 O oR s5) FEET FG THE POINT OF BEGINNING, LEGEND OF SYMBOLS R ABBREVIATIONS SET CISELED OSS SIHIDING SE T113TPOLE PEPSI m CONCRETE CONC l NA DE ROCN WaL STALL GET 11 NAIL POWER POLE -,. FENCE (FIRE NOTED) N"'LE A CONCRETE 1111 ANACLE (uNGLOWN) CONCRETE M 6 m e R INLET RE FIRE 1IDPAN ME] ELEATIC ENTRANCE oR TRANSFORMER PC GAS ENTRANCE o TELEPAGNE AID SIGN PAST ® EIGN ELECTRIC uNE TELEPIINHE LINE DOE GO III ANCHOR VICINITY MAP NO SCALE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL M 01 ° INT PROSPECT, It STATEMENT OF ENCROACHMENTS o- Fh PrnspeN f m s m I t Nnrmensh e an we p p f v e onto 1He I propert B re o 9 l4} Dpy o ud tle nt of the easement 0110 the "Hill, p 1 ,W-Ell encroaches of! Hu g polled oppeors fo encroach 11.D reel lnto HA A o portion at MISCELLANEOUS NOTES SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION o nII P,nePnl HnI 9 He,enn. ,an y =. and 7HIe enr,anrHmen,�. w _ � U W I Z Pho U m a 11-1.1 o O g >y A I OF Dole of Last Revson. a- la -zola *; AEA AEA W Z J W i o O LW J o $mG vv d = a_ S _ W W = ¢ p� ASA O EL LID W o 0 ACS Q O CA: Q O SHEEP 1 OF 5 I TV 1JNCT NABE P-11111 I'll, 11 PLAT OF SURVEY 11 F L TAI 02 C-NINI I—LI 'MATCH UNEE SHEET 2 c LDreML 111HILT -111HIL I 1—TIN A 15 PARCE A F1 EL ONE STORY BLOCK & GLASS L COMMERCIA _L BU DING H HENi I LLINJ JJJ • NI 111T —1A J 1111 ITJ IT, .11 11—T — ENTIANCE E, AT, N I�IKIN I IIA LL I 'T L A, —T PH 11LIA 1— N IT �— .a corveaEL MEaI s* I—AL I FliNj IIATI Y/ E IT I Ll EIIEPT IN I ETI E UNU I ALLJ as PARCEL DOCUMENT ON To --T TWO STORY o CaG �rcNC U 11 PIIHNI IT-1 BRICK & STUCCO Nu M BER LR 320-6 Ali Ri &% COMMERCIAL BUILDING Porev ' III FT A— AI'll IT41 'I 'N T Al— 11PIALT Al 11 11 "A KNN • 1b, LL I PA111- ATALLI 1 1-1- —Y1 —1A T I YPn C mE— C, 'D T, -FT ONE STORY MASON By C OMMERCIAL _ EA1T`1UNL1'TG1EiI1T ANP B B B OB B� EAST CENTRAL NIA 11 21 1 813 32' PIN' IF 1ElINNIN1— ROAD 'ET 'i 'ELEN IN AINIIETE _ U - CD 0 03 0 Un AS EL o A C, U cj� 0 < AS Oa z 0 0 < ,c) SCALE 1 SHEET PLAT OF SURVE 83 2 35 (832 5�, - z roNIETE p �m off h ^ All- KA" 'T IF sP�A ME EXCEPTION FOR CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION CENTENNIAL DRIVE�a „`TOAw;, q_(��.'�� PART OF LOT 1 PLAZA SUBDIVISION / ` " "" 9.13-E cPHELc� OAOj 40p T / `ASPHA RIVE I S > HALL o .t� S8 Z E / z `ASPHALr� EllT CENTENNIAL DRIVE ® LE -11 ANEEHHMEI IF 111LI ioPA Ao) Hoor.""A I e 1-311a E III .TO�� a /1 A, 11HLr� �® 7 ®HE � �LHArs AD � PARCEL 9 ® "�� rxcrvcnoreuH °�� CASPHAEr o ONE STORY ®P Q BLOCK & GLASS � O �asaHn�r\ onE HA � AREA COM Naa RCIA BUoL�DING md35, T LL FEN �E A�r� C sa C7 °om m: so3 EMRPNr£ ' n A ® ¢�h� H I� E (rv�P) H / 6 0 ASP W a irHAN E s $ 3 ' ° nur IE � so,Er. ONE STO NYENrreANCE a z. # Q k Fi BLOCK & GLASS Co o ME oro "s, Bnrv ESN Ea rc�r(rvaE hcE oB d \ 1 LL �e.o ('rv)5 a o m AIPHA S ® AS A �AH, � � HAL �, rAti C A�PHAE, _PS ALL f,E b C- AILHLr -) O M W Z V U cn No Z CO � m o = UL Z z W (b o�F w = a.e oa8 CCD z a5 mp = o I 0 ED Wo U Q E: O A Z O Q � m SCALE: 1 1 21 11 � SHEET 3 OF 5 1 a PLAT OF SURVEY O O .aANa �a3zw a3 a�z \9 �N9 r a PARCEL z ' "WAL -MART PARCEL" acv) a .0 PARCEL 3 �NO v O z \ �asPna* EXCEPTION TO PARCEL 1 g° PART OF LOT 1 PLAZA SUBDIVISION l sr9 I N,; \ h ss N ' o p SCALE: V — W s ,B� 6 R�47a. �� 0 2 ioo 1.1 N—El; 11— / SHEET 4 OF 5 9 � R;9a 9SH �92 O \ \ P Z� \ cc IET 1111-1 j -HAS. ww r i C O O r a ' acv) a .0 O �NO v O z \ �asPna* o g° l sr9 I N,; h ss N ' o p SCALE: V — W s ,B� 6 R�47a. �� 0 2 ioo 1.1 N—El; 11— / SHEET 4 OF 5 AT OF SURVEY a�soa� as GAS, WATER, ELECTRIC/TELEPHONE & MISCELLANEOUS EASEMENTS -------------- --- -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- ------ M � T CENTENNIAL DRIVE - ------------- E o < -- ------------ - - - - -- --- ------------ ------------ -- --------- 898 NCO V 0, 4, \sa 088 D oT, Vi! 7 o D3 - - - ------ - - 0 /� o ----- -- ------ ------ R I --------------------- — ------ - ------- - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — EAST CENTRAL ROAD -- z 0 0 (3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - u < o . < "N 11 11 N Ill ' N SCALE 1" van SHEET 5 OF 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, CONDITIONAL USE FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT & VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA, (990-1145 MT. PROSPECT PLAZA, 940-950 EAST RAND ROAD AND 1200-1220 EAST CENTRAL ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL WHEREAS, Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L. P. (“Petitioner”), has filed a petition for a Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD), Conditional Use for a Drive-Through Establishment and Variation (Lot Coverage) for property located at Mount Prospect Plaza, 990-1145 Mt. Prospect Plaza, 940-950 East Rand Road and 1200-1220 East Central Road (“Property”) and legally described as; PARCEL 1: LOT 1 (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARTS THEREOF TAKEN FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS BY CONDEMNATION REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER LR-3201616, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF TAKEN FOR CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION BY PLAT REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER LR- 3202476) IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ON JULY 16, 1979 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION AFORESAID DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAND ROAD AS DEDICATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, A DISTANCE OF 296.41 (RECORD 297.66) FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON A TANGENTIAL CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,072.46 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 730 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 615.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED FEBRUARY 11, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION AFORESAID, 234.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 832.35 (RECORD 832.55) FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL ONE ABOVE ALSO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, BY METES AND BOUNDS, AS FOLLOWS: PART OF LOT 1, PLAZA SUBDIVISION, IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEST GATE ROAD AND EAST CENTRAL ROAD; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 813.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 419.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 33 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, 35.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 120.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, 35.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 38.52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,072.46 FEET AND A LONG CHORD SUBTENDED BEARING OF NORTH 53 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, 252.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 12 SECONDS EAST, 615.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, 698.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST, 123.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, 416.97 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET AND A LONG CHORD SUBTENDED BEARING OF SOUTH 78 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 16.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, 135.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, 24.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, 1,111.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL ONE FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, PARKING OR MOTOR VEHICLES, LOADING AND UNLOADING OF COMMERCIAL AND OTHER VEHICLES, AND FOR THE USE OF ROADWAYS, WALKWAYS, AND FACILITIES INSTALLED FOR THE COMFORT AND CONVENIENCE OF CUSTOMERS, INVITEES, LICENSEES, TENANTS AND EMPLOYEES OF ALL BUSINESSES AND OCCUPANTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AS GRANTED BY EASEMENTS AND COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING LAND DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1990 BY AND BETWEEN MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND WAL-MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF DEEDS OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1990 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 90474272, OVER AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED "WAL-MART PARCEL" AS DEFINED THEREIN DESIGNATED AS PARKING AREAS: THAT PART OF LOT 1 (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARTS THEREOF TAKEN FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY CONDEMNATION REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3201616, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF TAKEN FOR CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION BY PLAT REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476) IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON JULY 16, 1979, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAND ROAD AS DEDICATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, A DISTANCE OF 296.41 (RECORD 297.66) FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON A TANGENTIAL CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,072.46 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 730 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 615.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED FEBRUARY 11, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION AFORESAID, 234.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 832.35 (RECORD 832.55) FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL ONE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL SUBSURFACE LINES AND CONDUITS FOR WATERMAINS, SANITARY SEWER LINES, STORM SEWERS AND RELATED ACCESSORY FACILITIES, TOGETHER WITH ALL SURFACE STORM WATER DETENTION AREAS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RETENTION PONDS EXISTING OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED, AS GRANTED BY EASEMENTS WITH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING LAND DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1990 BY AN BETWEEN MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND WAL-MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF DEEDS OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1990 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 90474272, OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THOSE PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED "WAL-MART PARCEL" AS DEFINED THEREIN DESIGNATED AS UTILITY EASEMENT AREA AS DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "E" THERETO: THAT PART OF LOT 1 (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARTS THEREOF TAKEN FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY CONDEMNATION REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3201616, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF TAKEN FOR CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION BY PLAT REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476) IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON JULY 16, 1979, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAND ROAD AS DEDICATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 3104778, A DISTANCE OF 296.41 (RECORD 297.66) FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON A TANGENTIAL CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,072.46 FEET, FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 730 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 615.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED FEBRUARY 11, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 3202476; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF CENTENNIAL SUBDIVISION AFORESAID, 234.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN PLAZA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 832.35 (RECORD 832.55) FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Property Index Nos. 03-35-301-055-0000, 03-35-301-056-0000, 03-35-301-057-0000 and 03-35-302-014-000, 03-35-302-015-0000 WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks 1) Conditional Use Permit for a Final Planned Unit Development, to construct two (2) new outlot buildings, and 2) Conditional Use Permit for a Drive Through Establishment; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation to allow overall lot coverage of eighty-six percent (86%) as shown on the Petitioner’s site plan dated March 31, 2014, attached as Exhibit “A” for property located at Mount Prospect Plaza, 990-1145 Mt. Prospect Plaza, 940-950 East Rand Road and 1200-1220 East Central Road; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use Permits and Variation designated as PZ-14-14, before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect th on the 26 day of June, 2014, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been published in the th Daily Herald Newspaper on the 11 day of June, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-14-14; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permits and Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect grant 1) a Conditional Use permit for a Final Planned Unit Development for two (2) new outlot buildings and 2) a Conditional Use permit for a Drive Through Establishment, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached and made a part of as Exhibit “A.” SECTION THREE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect grant a variation to allow an overall lot coverage of eighty-six percent (86%) subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., dated April 18, 2014; 2. Development of the outlot building in general conformance with the building elevations prepared by Wah Yee Associates dated April 10, 2014. Color schemes for buildings shall match those of existing buildings; 3. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by 3D Design Studio, dated June 25, 2014, but revised to provide evergreen plant material along Westgate Road and the drive-through; 4. Development of the site in general conformance with the photometric plan prepared by Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., dated April 18, 2014; 5. Submittal of fixture cut-sheets for exterior lights that comply with Village Code; 6. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings for review and approval by the Village. The engineering drawings shall include all site work including utilities, storm water detention, and associated improvements; 7. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code regulations, lighting regulations, Sign Code regulations; and building regulations; and 8. Issuance of a building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of, 2014. ______________________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\files\WIN\ORDINANC\Con Use PUDvariaiontpz14-14mtprospectplaza SCALEDTO90% ORIGINALDOCUMENTSIZE24"x36" Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JULY 3, 2014 P & Z FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS — 2014 ACTION PLAN BUDGET The Village of Mount Prospect is classified as an entitlement community for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and receives an annual allocation of funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD requires a 5 -year Consolidated Plan to shape housing and community development programs into effective, coordinated neighborhood and community development strategies. Each year the Village is required to submit an annual Action Plan to HUD, which proposes eligible activities to be undertaken in the upcoming fiscal year to address the Priorities and Objectives described in the current 5 -year Consolidated Plan. The Village's responsibility is to ensure that Mount Prospect residents, specifically those considered as low /moderate - income, are benefiting from the CDBG grant. 2014 ACTION PLAN BUDGET The federal allocation of $271,504 is the primary portion of the Village's 2014 CDBG budget. Other revenue sources that contribute to program funding include program income and non - allocated carryover funds. Program income is generated from repayment of outstanding 0% interest rehabilitation loans. With an estimated $60,000 in program income and $110,096 of carry -over funds, the total anticipated amount available for 2014 is $441,600. Please see the Proposed CDBG Budget attached. It should also be noted that the Village is currently in a transition period of changing our CDBG fiscal year. This is due to the recent resolution approved by the Village Board, authorizing our participation in Cook County's HOME Investment Partnerships Program Consortium. In electing to join the Cook County HOME Consortium, the Village must modify its existing CDBG Program Year to conform with the Consortium's Program Year, which runs from October 1 through September 30 (as opposed to our current fiscal calendar year of January 1 through December 31). 2014 PROPOSED FUNDING FOR NON - VILLAGE AGENCIES Each year, as we develop our annual Action Plan, the Community Relations Commission (CRC) had the responsibility to "Review requests for funding from non - Village agencies and make recommendations with respect to such requests ". This responsibility has now been transferred to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission (P &Z) based their public service program recommendations on staff memos, funding applications, and presentations from the public service agencies. On April 24, 2014, the P &Z held a public meeting regarding the 2014 CDBG budget, which allowed each of the public service applicants to present their 2014 funding applications and the P &Z then made their final budget recommendation to the Board of Trustees. 2014 PROPOSED FUNDING FOR VILLAGE ACTIVITIES Other than Public Service Programs, additional low- and moderate - income projects are proposed and will be administered by the Village. Our CDBG Single- Family Rehabilitation Loan Program, Home Weatherization Grant Program, Emergency Repair Program are administered through the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. In addition, funding is recommended for energy efficient improvements to a group home owned by Search Inc. and repairs and rehab work at the CEDA Northwest public facility in Mount Prospect. Funding is proposed for programs at the Community Connection Center and public infrastructure improvements, administered through the Village's Public Works Department include storm sewer improvements and public parkway tree replacement. Additional information on all the proposed programs and projects can be from in the attachment entitled "Summary of Specific Annual Objectives." CONCLUSION The Village Board is asked to consider the funding recommendations as they relate to the 2014 Action Plan. To assist in your review of these issues, the following items have been attached: • Proposed CDBG Budget PY2014 • April 24, 2014 P &Z Meeting Minutes • Summary of Specific Annual Objectives A required 30 -day public review period has taken place from June 4, 2014 through July 3, 2014. In order to meet HUD's timeline requirements, the Village Board must approve the 2014 Action Plan, which will then be submitted to Cook County by August I As lead agency for the Cook County HOME Consortium, HUD has requested that Cook County submit to them, a package which includes the 2014 Annual Action Plans for all HOME Consortium members. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at the July 15th meeting. Staff will be present at the meeting to answer any questions regarding this matter. Wi J. Cooney, Jr., AICP Director of Community Development H: \1 \CDBG \Reports\2014 \Action Plan Starting Oct 1\StatTMemo for VB \Memo 071514 docx CDBG BUDGET PY 2014 (October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015) Activities PY 2014 Funding Requests PY 2014 Proposed Budget Comments CDBG Administration* $54,300 + (20 %)PI SUB -TOTAL $66,300 See note #3 Public Service Programs CEDA - Emergency Housing 15,000 15,000 Children's Advoca Center 1,800 1,800 Journeys/ The Road Home (f /k /a PADS to HOPE_) 15,000 15,000 Life Span 5,000 5,000 Northwest CASA 5,000 5,000 Resources for Community Living 6,000 6,000 Suburban Primary Health Care Council - Access to Care 6,000 6,000 Villaqe of Mount Prospect - Community Connections Center 4,000 4,000 WINGS 10,000 10,000 SUB- TOTAL $67,800 $67,800 See note #4 Low/ Moderate Activities Single Family Rehab & Weatherization 95,000 Sinqle Family Rehab Administration 20,000 Emergency Repair Program 10,000 Search Inc.- rehab of group home 20,000 20,000 Public Parkway Tree Replacement 25,000 25,000 CEDA NW- rehab at Mount Prospect facility 12,500 12,500 Catalpa Drainage Improvements- 1800 Block of Catalpa Lane 290,000 0 Westgate Rd Storm Sewer Improvements 125,000 125,000 SUB -TOTAL $307,500 TOTAL FUNDS COMMITTED $441,600 HUD Allocation 271,504 Program Income* 60,000 See notes #1,2 Funds available to commit * 110,096 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $441,600 Notes: 1. Actual PY2013 CDBG Program Income (PI) as of April 2014 is $149,546.75 (Jan -Dec 2013) plus $42,285.52 (Jan- Sept 2014) = $191,832.27 2. Program Income is generated from repayment of outstanding 0 % Interest Loans 3. The max allowed by HUD For admin is $66,300; $54,300 (20% of CDBG Allocation) plus $12,000 (20 % of $60,000 estimated PI of program year). 4. The max allowed by HUD for public service is $69,500.44; $40,725.60 (15% of CDBG Allocation) plus $28,774.84 (15% of $191,832.27 previous year's PI). 5. Numbers with * are subject to change. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. N/A PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUEST MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: April 24, 2014 N/A N/A April 9 2014 N/A 2014 CDBG Funding Recommendations & Presentations by Public Service Agencies Joseph Donnelly, Chair Norbert Mizwicki William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jacqueline Hinaber Jeanne Kueter Sharon Otteman Thomas Fitzgerald Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development Janet Saewert, Neighborhood Planner Various Public Service Agencies After hearing one additional case, Chairman Donnelly introduced the next order of business - Community Development Block Grant- Public Service Agencies and 2014 Funding Recommendations and stated the case is Village Board Final. Mr. Simmons gave a brief overview regarding the Community Development Block Grant funds that the Village receives annually. He explained the funds are used to help low to moderate income residents within the community. Mr. Simmons stated the funds assist individuals in the Single Family Rehabilitation Program by allowing the Village to give out zero percent (0 %) loans to qualifying households for home improvements. He further stated that a portion of the funding is also allocated to public service organizations. Mr. Simmons stated previously this item used to come to the Planning Commission for review and then was switched over to the Community Relations Commission for review; however, that commission has been eliminated and now the Planning Commission will be in charge of the review. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, April 24 2014 CDBG Chairman Joseph Donnelly Mr. Simmons introduced Janet Saewert, Neighborhood Planner. Ms. Saewert explained the Village of Mount Prospect is considered an Entitlement Community for the Community Development Block Grant Program which means that the Village receives an annual allocation from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Ms. Saewert further explained that the Village is required to prepare a five year consolidated plan so that strategies are created to achieve the goals and needs of the communities. Ms. Saewert stated that each year the Village is required to submit an action plan to HUD. This plan proposes eligible activities that address the community's objectives and priorities. Ms. Saewert gave a brief overview explaining the three sources of funding. She explained these three sources as annual grant allocation, program income, and non - allocated carryover funds. Ms. Saewert stated that the Village is currently in a transition period of changing the CDBG fiscal year. She further explained through a recent resolution by Village Board to join the Cook County Consortium for Home Funds, the Village is required to modify its CDBG fiscal year from January I to December 31 to October 1 St to September 30 th . Ms. Saewert explained because of this, Cook County is giving the Village non - federal funding for continued public service programs. Ms. Saewert explained the role of the Community Relations Commission before it was eliminated. Ms. Saewert stated that applications from each of the organizations were included in the Commissioners' packets along with funding requests. Ms. Saewert stated that HUD limits the amount of funding to fifteen percent (15 %) of the current year grant allocation plus fifteen percent (15 %) of the prior year's program income that can be allocated to public service organizations. She explained because of the fiscal year transition the amount the Village can allocate to public services in 2014 exceeds the amount requested. Ms. Saewert explained that Staff uses additional criteria in addition to HUD's requirements when reviewing applications. Ms. Saewert stated that Staff is recommending funding in the amount requested to each of the public service organizations that have applied. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any questions for staff. Hearing none, he called the organizations up individually to give a brief presentation. Chairman Donnelly swore in Doctor Bob Walsh, executive director of resources for Community Living 4300 Lincoln, Rolling Meadows. Dr. Walsh explained that his agency helps individuals with developmental disabilities live independently in the community. He explained the agency helps these individuals find homes and jobs within the community. He stated that the agency has been around for twenty (20) years. He thanked the board for their support. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, April 24 2014 CDBG Chairman Joseph Donnelly Chairman Donnelly swore in Greg Walkington 4217 Leigh Street, Skokie Illinois. Mr. Walkington stated that he is the director of operations of Search Inc. He explained Search Inc. is requesting $20,000 for the replacement of windows and doors at 1007 North Sycamore in Mount Prospect, Illinois. He gave a brief overview explaining the need for the new windows and doors. He stated that six women with intellectual disabilities live in the home and that Search Inc. has owned the property for over eighteen years. He gave a brief overview of Search Inc. and thanked the board. Chairman Donnelly swore in Victoria Bigelow 2612 W. Windsor, Chicago. Ms. Bigelow stated that she represents the Suburban Primary Healthcare Council which runs the Access to Care Program. She explained that the organization serves the uninsured throughout suburban Cook County. She gave a brief overview of the low costs her organization provides for low income households healthcare. She stated that funds stay local and will help low income residents of Mount Prospect receive adequate healthcare. Chairman Donnelly swore in Courtney Fredrick 820 N. Mozart Chicago Illinois. Ms. Fredrick stated that she is the Development Coordinator at Life Span which is an agency that assists victims of domestic violence and sexual assault in Cook County. She stated Life Span offers legal services to the victims and counseling for woman and children. She gave a brief history about the agency. She stated they are requesting $5,000 from the Village of Mount Prospect to help provide services to victims of domestic violence. She also stated the agency has been denied funds from the Village the past two years. Commissioner Youngquist asked why they were denied. Ms. Fredrick stated she wasn't sure, but served 106 Mount Prospect residents in the past year. Chairman Donnelly swore in Jim Huenink 2350 N. Cleveland Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Huenink stated that he is the Executive Director of Northwest Center Against Sexual Assault. He explained the agency's primary service is counseling to rape and sexual assault victims from three (3) years to eighty three (83) years of age. He explained the agency also provides court advocacy at the Rolling Meadows and Skokie court houses. He further explained that all of the services are free and that the organization relies on program and government funding. Commissioner Hinaber asked if the agency was affiliated with NWAR. Mr. Huenink stated that the agency used to be called NWAR and in 1998 changed to the Northwest Center of Sexual Assault. Chairman Donnelly swore in Terry Channer 765 Harmon Boulevard, Hoffman Estates. Ms. Channer stated that she is the Senior Director of Development for Wings, which is an organization that has been in service for 20 years. She explained that Wings provides housing and services to homeless and abused woman and children. She stated in 2013 Wings provided 20 Mount Prospect residents with Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, April 24 2014 CDBG Chairman Joseph Donnelly 2200 nights of shelter. She also explained that the agency supplies counseling to victims. She thanked the board for their time. Chairman Donnelly swore in Victoria Bran 1711 W. Algonquin Road Mount Prospect. Ms. Bran stated that she is the Coordinator of the Community Connections Center in Mount Prospect. She gave a brief description of her roll at the Community Center. She explained that the CDBG funds provide materials needed to help support small programs like Conversations with Language Learners Program that aren't normally funded by the Human Services Department. Ms. Bran gave a brief description of all the programs the Community Connections Center puts together for the community. She thanked the board for their support. Chairman Donnelly swore Bonnie Fries 829 E. Madison Street Lombard, Illinois. Ms. Fries stated that she is the Assistant Director at the Children's Advocacy Center of North and Northwest Cook County. She stated the Children's Advocacy Center is requesting funds to help with its various programs that help children affected by severe physical and sexual abuse. She gave a brief explanation of the services the agency provides including a one -time meeting with all concerned parties and the victim, so the child doesn't have to explain their story multiple times. She also stated that the services are free. She thanked the board for their support. Chairman Donnelly swore in Brad Jordan 708 June Terrace Lake Zurich, Illinois. Mr. Jordan stated he represents CEDA Northwest which provides solution focused counseling for people who are going through some kind of crisis. He explained that CEDA also helps with financial counseling, transitional housing, and money management counseling. Mr. Jordan gave a brief detailed description of the various programs provided by CEDA. Commissioner Mizwicki asked how CEDA gets referrals. Mr. Jordan stated that word of mouth, and referrals from other agencies such as United Way, village townships, and the internet are main sources of referrals to CEDA. He thanked the board for their support. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any other agencies that needed to present. Hearing none, he closed the public portion of the meeting and brought the discussion back to the board. Ms. Saewert restated the reason for the excess in funds for the board. She further explained that the surplus will help fund other programs once the public service organizations have hit their limit of program funds. Commissioner Kueter made a motion seconded by Commissioner Hinaber to approve the fundings as presented. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Kueter, Hinaber, Youngquist, Beattie, Mizwicki, Donnelly Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, April 24 2014 CDBG Chairman Joseph Donnelly NAYS: None Chairman Donnelly stated the motion was approved 6 -0 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. After hearing one additional case, Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Yongquist and the meeting was adjourned at 8:48 pm. Jenna Moder Administrative Assistant Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, April 24 2014 CDBG Chairman Joseph Donnelly 'SU MMARY OF SP ECIFIC ANNUAL OBJECTIVES In the Village's 2010 -2014 CDBG Consolidated Plan, several objectives were listed as strategies to meet the priorities of the plan. The objectives for the Village of Mount Prospect that are to be carried out in 2014 are as follows: ADMINISTRATION HUD allows communities to use 20% of the annual allocation plus 20% program income of the program year toward administrative expenses. Of the 2014 grant allocation, $271,504, a maximum of $54,300 is available for administration costs. In 2014, the Village anticipates spending $54,300 (20 %) of CDBG grant amount plus approximately $12,000 (20% of $60,000 estimated program income) for total administrative costs estimated at $66,300. PUBLIC S ERVI CE PROGRAMS The following describes the public service providers that have requested Community Development Block Grant funds during FY 2014. Our annual entitlement grant amount will be $271,504. HUD allows only 15% of the annual allocation, plus 15% of the previous year's program income, to be granted to public service programs. Program Income is generated from the repayment of loans issued by the Single Family Rehabilitation Loan program or the Emergency Repair Program, and typically averages $60,000 per year. However, due to the shift in our Program Year, and the housing market bouncing back, Program Income for 2013 (as of April 2014) has totaled $191,832.27. The projected maximum funding available for 2014 public service programs is $69,500. Staff is recommending $67,800 of those funds be allocated to Public Service Programs with the difference to be allocated to Low /Moderate Projects which also address the Priorities identified in the Village's Consolidated Plan. CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center Emergency Housing Program Administrative Facility: 1300 W. Northwest Hwy, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 1: Affordable Housing, Objective 3: Housing with Supportive Services and Objective 4: Outreach and Education. Priority 2: Homeless /Continuum of Care, Objective 1: Homeless Prevention and Objective 4 Transitional Housing Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: Serve 123 individuals. Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: Served 129 individuals from Mount Prospect. FY 2014 Goal: To assist 114 (both components) individuals with transitional housing, rent assistance and housing counseling. Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $11,000 FY2014 Funding Request: $15,000 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $15,000 Considering Factors: CEDA Northwest administers a Housing Assistance Program that prevents individuals and families from losing their housing by providing support intervention and comprehensive supportive services to help families stabilize. The Housing Assistance Program has two components: Component I: aids families at risk of becoming homeless due to situations beyond their control and consists of housing -1- counseling, financial assistance (rent and mortgage), and budget and financial counseling. Component II: is transitional Housing for individuals and families who are unable to maintain housing and helps individuals and families regain housing independence. This component provides transitional housing and supportive services to individuals and families to help them become self- sufficient. This program provides much needed services to the problems associated with current housing /economy concerns and addresses multiple Consolidated Plan objectives. Funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: None Other Available Funding: Source Wheelinq Township Fundin Portion fo M P $31,500 10,000 307,847 70,00 $ 419 , 347 Residents $7,2 4,79 43,045 19 $74,130 United Wav HUD Private Contributions Total Children's Advocacy Center of North and Northwest Cook County Administrative Facility: 640 Illinois Boulevard, Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 4: Youth Programs, Objective 3: Abused and Neglected Youth Services and Objective 5: Family Support Groups Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: Provide direct services to 24 child victims Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: Served 32 children from Mount Prospect. FY 2014 Goal: To provide direct services to 32 child victims of sexual abuse, severe physical abuse, domestic violence and other crimes. The Center provides immediate support and crisis intervention following reports of abuse or family violence, child interviews and medical exams, court advocacy, and counseling and support groups. Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $1,500 FY2014 Funding Request: $1,800 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $1,800 Considering Factors: The Children's Advocacy Center is the only agency in the north and northwest suburbs providing a type of service offered through the Coordination, Advocacy and Sensitive Interviewing Program (CASI) and is the lead agency for the Safe From the Start Program, serving children 0 -5 exposed to violence. Family Support Services complement the CASI Program by providing intensive counseling services for families. All services are provided free of charge and are offered in English, Spanish or Polish. Funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: None -2- Other Available Funding: Source Funding Portion for MP_ Residents DCFS 208,576 8,343 IL Criminal Justice Info Auth 92,207 2,315 United Way 80,000 3,200 Topfer Family Foundation 7,500 300 Hedqe Funds Care 40 1,600 Total $428,283 $15,758 Journeys /The Road Home (f /k /a PADS to HOPE, Inc,) Location: 1140 East Northwest Hwy, Palatine, IL 60074 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 1: Affordable Housing, Objective 4: Outreach and Education. Priority 2: Homeless /Continuum of Care, Objective 3: Emergency Housing. Priority 5: Public Service Needs, Objective 1: Mental Health. Priority 6: Economic Development, Objective 2: Employment /Job training programs. Tan -Dec 2013 Goal: To address the needs of 69 homeless and near homeless. San -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: Provided direct client services to 77 Mount Prospect residents. FY 2014 Goal: To address the needs of 60 homeless and near homeless Mount Prospect clients. Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $ 7,500 FY2014 Funding Request: $15,000 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $15,000 Considering Factors: Funding is requested to support PADS to HOPE's homeless service programs for Mount Prospect residents. Services are provided by the HOPE Day Resource Center, including case management, mental health counseling, housing coordination, vocational training, and a variety of immediate services (food, clothing, supplies) and the PADS Emergency Shelter Program, offering food and overnight shelter. Case managers help an individual address issues that brought them to their current situation. Because this agency addresses multiple Consolidated Plan objectives, funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: None Other Available Funding: Source Funding Portion for MP Residents HUD Supportive Services Grant $186,000 $5580 Cook County ESG /CDBG 30,000 900 Private Donations 110,000 3,000 Total J $326,000 $9,480 -3- Life Span Administrative Facility: P.O. Box 1515 Des Plaines, IL 60017 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 5: Public Service Needs, Objective 5: Supportive programs for persons with special needs, Priority 2: Homelessness /Continuum of Care, Objective 4: Transitional Source Funding Housing Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: n/a Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: n/a FY 2014 Goal: To serve 100 Mount Prospect clients. Life Span provides Polk Bros. Foundation legal and counseling services to victims of domestic violence 3,000 and sexual assault, and their children. Services are free of 8,000 charge. Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $0 2014 Funding Request: $5,000 2014 Funding Recommended: $5,000 Considering Factors: Funding is requested for general operating support to fund agency programming provided in the North and Northwest suburbs of Chicago, specifically the residents of Mount Prospect. Although there are other services available in the Northwest suburbs for domestic violence and sexual assault victims and their families, no other agency provides civil legal and immigration representation to victims of domestic violence in the northwest suburbs. Life Span collaborates and maintains referral networks with other agencies, provides legal services and individual and group counseling for WINGS residences, and has provided training for WINGS staff. Even though there is an overlap of some services, because we have the CDBG funding available for 2014, funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: None Other Available Funding: Source Funding Portion for MP Residents Elk Grove Township j $20,000 $20,000 Wheelinq Township 15,000 15,000 Polk Bros. Foundation 60,000 3,000 Mary Lou Downs Foundation 8,000 1,600 Illinois Bar Foundation 10,000 10,000 Total $113,000 $49,600 North west Center Against Sexual Assault (CASA) Administrative Facility: 415 W. Golf Road, Suite #47, Arlington Heights, IL 60005 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 5: Public Service Needs, Objective 5: Supportive programs for persons with special needs. Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: To provide counseling and advocacy to 30 Mount Prospect residents. Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: Funds directly served 22 residents with 200 hours of counseling, advocacy and crisis services. -4- FY 2014 Goal: To provide counseling and advocacy to child, adolescent, and adult victims of rape and /or sexual abuse to 30 Mount Prospect residents. Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $4,000 FY2014 Funding Request: $5,000 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $5,000 Considering Factors: NW CASA is the only agency in the north /northwest suburbs that provides specialized counseling, advocacy and crisis intervention for victims of sexual abuse from ages three to 85 years old. Funds will be utilized to provide services that include: crisis intervention, assessment, telephone counseling, individual medical advocacy and criminal justice advocacy. Even though there is an overlap of some services, because we have the CDBG funding available for 2014, funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: None Other Available Funding: 1 source Fundinq Portion for MP Residents ICASA 230,955 12,500 IL Attorney General 23,775 1,100 Cook Countv 36,600 1,000 Contributions /Fundraising 25,930 1,000 United Way 50,000 1,000 Total $367,260 $16,600 Resources for Community Living Administrative Facility: 4300 Lincoln Avenue, Suite K, Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 1: Affordable Housing, Objective 3: Housing with Supportive Services. Priority 5: Public Service Needs, Objective 5: Supportive programs for persons with special needs. Priority 6: Economic Development, Objective 2: Employment /job training programs. Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: To provide housing options and supportive services to 24 residents. Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: Served 6 individuals with disabilities. This number reflects unduplicated yearly total numbers, thus an individual is counted once despite receiving services over multiple quarters. FY 2014 Goal: To provide housing options and support services to people with developmental and /or physical disabilities, allowing 30 Mount Prospect residents with disabilities to experience greater access and independence within the community Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $0 FY2014 Funding Request: $6,000 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $6,000 Considering Factors: Resources for Community Living has been a unique provider of housing options and support services to people with developmental and /or physical disabilities. The purpose of -5- the service is to allow persons with disabilities the chance to live independently in homes or apartments throughout the community, reducing potential homelessness and unnecessary institutionalization. In order to increase the quality of life for adults with developmental and /or physical disabilities, this program offers a number of services including: affordable housing, homeownership programs, individualized support services, participation in social groups, vocational services and rent subsidy. Because this agency addresses multiple Consolidated Plan objectives, funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: None Other Available Funding: Source Funding Portion for MP Residents De 2t of Human Services $12,685 $2,156 Cook County CDBG 35,000 5,950 Local Municipalities 15,800 2,686 Cash Donations 38,995 6 629 _Others Total 113,256 19,253 $215,736 $36,674 Suburban Primary Health Care Council - Access to Care Administrative Facility: 2225 Enterprise Drive, Suite 2507, Westchester, IL 60154 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 5: Public Service Needs, Objective 1: Health Care Assistance. Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: To assist 9 uninsured, low income residents. Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: The grant funded 10 residents of Mount Prospect. FY 2014 Goal: A grant of $6,000 would fund 8 residents of Mount Prospect. The proposed total number of clients for the grant period that would be Mount Prospect residents is 140. Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $6,000 FY2014 Funding Request: $6,000 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $6,000 Considering Factors: This program allows low- income, uninsured or underinsured residents of Mount Prospect to receive primary health care services including physician office visits, prescription drugs, laboratory and radiology services. Members are generally enrolled for a year and may re- enroll if they are still eligible. Because this agency fills a need that is not provided by other local organizations or agencies, funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: None Other Available Funding: Source Funding I Portion for MP Residents Wheeling Township 18,000 2,013 Cook County 3,000,000 59,528 Corporations & Foundations 500,000 10,000 WE Enrollment Fee 75,000 1,500 State of Illinois 30,000 0 Other 237 000 2,740 Total $3,860,000 _ $75,781 Vi/ /age of Mount Prospect; Community Connections Center Administrative Facility: 1711 W. Algonquin Road Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 5: Public Service Needs, Objective 5: Supportive programs for persons with special needs, Objective 6: Communication and Awareness. Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: n/a Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: n/a FY 2014 Goal: CDBG funding is requested to support programs that enhance our residents' lives in relation to safety, housing, health employment and education. Some of these programs include Tenants' Rights Classes, Health and Nutrition Classes Woman Support Groups, English Speaking Skills and junior high. 400 proposed Mount Prospect residents would benefit from this program. Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $0 FY2014 Funding Request: $4,000 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $4,000 Considering Factors: The goal of the Center is to serve low income, diverse and underserved populations of Mount Prospect. The CCC provides a pathway to Village services, social services, medical health, personal safety, library services, quality education, economic self - sufficiency, jobs, cultural enrichment and other services. 99% if the participants have been Mount Prospect residents, no other funding sources are available for these educational programs, funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: None Other Available Funding: None for the proposed program WINGS Program, Inc. Administrative Facility: Consolidated Plan Priority: Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: FY 2014 Goal: San -Dec 2013 Funding Received: FY2014 Funding Request: FY2014 Funding Recommended: P.O. Box 95615, Palatine, IL 60095 Priority 2: Homelessness /Continuum of Care, Objective 4: Transitional Housing. Priority 5: Public Service Needs, Objective 5: Supportive programs for persons with special needs, n/a n/a To serve 20 women and their children with safe, decent housing and supportive services. $0 $10,000 $10,000 -7- Considering Factors: WINGS provides housing and supportive services to women and children who are homeless due to domestic violence or other causes. Women in transitional and emergency shelter work on agreed -upon service plans that include moving to more permanent housing from their first day with WINGS. Although other agencies provide transitional housing, only WINGS has a continuum of housing ranging from emergency shelter through permanent supportive housing that allows homeless women to have a housing solution based on their individual needs. Because of this housing array, WINGS can accommodate women who are fleeing domestic violence, women who are unemployed or underemployed, and women who have a son older than 12 years old. Other programs cannot accommodate such a broad range of women in need. Funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/15 Program Income Anticipated: None Other Available Funding: Sourc Government Gran Resale Store Revenu Fundin �*R Portion f MP Residents $33,717 58,440 18,500 38,800 Contributions Special Events United Wav Total 462,500 970,000 86,000 5 440 397 L OW /MODERATE PROJECTS CEDA Northwest - Rehab Administrative Facility: 1300 W. Northwest Hwy, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 1: Affordable Housing, Priority 2: Homeless /Continuum of Care, Priority 4: Youth Programs, Priority 5: Public Service Needs. ]an -Dec 2013 Goal: n/a ]an -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: n/a FY 2014 Goal: Due to this past winter season, CEDA's building experienced numerous leaks caused by a gutter system constantly filled with ice. As the snow and ice melted, it found numerous ways to back up into the ceiling and come down the inside of the building. An estimated $12,500 is needed to address the exterior modifications that are required to weld the cracks in the gutters, adjust the steel gutters and downspouts so they drain away from the building properly, repair insulation and interior damages. At the same time, this project will address a leaking joint seam between the original roof and an addition completed in 2001. Tan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: n/a FY2014 Funding Request: $12,500 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $12,500 - 8 - Considering Factors: Through the face to face conversations and thousands of phone calls coming into their facility at 1300 W. NW Hwy, CEDA provides information referrals, housing counseling assistance, career coaching, child care assistance, Affordable Care Act enrollment services, food connection services, transitional living, money management, and emergency services assistance. Their services are a valuable asset to our community. CDBG funding for repairs to their facility are recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/15 Program Income Anticipated: n/a Other Available Funding: None for the proposed rehab work Search Development Center - Rehab Administrative Facility: 1925 N. Clybourn Ave., Suite 200, Chicago, IL 60014 Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 1: Affordable Housing, Objective 3: Housing with Supportive Services. Priority 5: Public Service Needs, Objective 5: Supportive programs for persons with special needs Jan -Dec 2013 Goal: Replace windows and doors throughout the group home at 908 S. Golfview, which is home to six women with intellectual disabilities. Jan -Dec 2013 Accomplishment: Project was completed. FY 2014 Goal: Search Inc. is requesting support for its Supportive Living program, which provides community-based homes for adults with intellectual disabilities. They are requesting CDBG funds to make energy- efficient improvements at their community home located at 1007 N. Sycamore in Mount Prospect. The funds would be used to replace windows and doors, ensuring the comfort and safety of six women with intellectual disabilities who live at Sycamore, as well as helping Search combat rising energy costs. Jan -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $15,000 FY2014 Funding Request: $20,000 FY2014 Funding Recommended: $20,000 Considering Factors: Search's Supportive Living Services consist of a broad range of services and supports for adults with developmental disabilities. In addition to providing housing, Search's Supportive Living Program also provides employment, community integration, and medical and behavioral services for the individuals who reside in its homes. Because this agency addresses multiple Consolidated Plan objectives, funding is recommended for the proposed rehab work. Target Completion Date: 9/30/2015 Program Income Anticipated: n/a Single Family Rehabilitation Loan Program & Home Weatherization Grant Program Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 1: Affordable Housing, Objective 1: Invest /reinvest in existing housing stock 2013 Funding Received: $94,000 2014 Funding Recommended: $95,000 Considering Factors: This program is implemented through the Community ]an -Dec 2013 Funding Received: Development Department's Planning Division. Due to the 2014 Funding Recommended: age of housing stock in Mount Prospect, many residents Considering Factors: must perform rehabilitation on their property. The cost of housing rehabilitation is often a burden for low- and moderate - income homeowners. The Village anticipates assisting 8 low- income households with housing rehabilitation during FY 2014. Of the 8 households, the Village anticipates assisting 6 eligible households for the 0% Interest Loan Program and 2 eligible households for the Home Weatherization Grant Program. These programs provide community-wide benefit to the low- and moderate - income residents of Mount Prospect. Funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/15 Program Income Anticipated: $60,000 (Program income is repayment of outstanding loans from the CDBG housing rehab program. These funds will be used to fund all programs and activities prior to the annual allocation.) Emergency Repair Program Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 1: Affordable Housing, Objective 1: Invest /reinvest in existing housing stock ]an -Dec 2013 Funding Received: $10,000 2014 Funding Recommended: $10,000 Considering Factors: This program is implemented through the Community Development Department's Planning Division. The goal is to provide the homeowner with a grant or loan (depending on the total amount) to make repairs of an immediate nature such as the repair or replacement of inoperable mechanical systems and /or the repair of an actively leaking roof. This program will allow homeowners to make the necessary repairs without having to worry about the short-term costs. The Village anticipates assisting 2 eligible households through the Emergency Repair Program. Funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 09/30/15 Program Income Anticipated: Included in the $60,000 estimated program income, for the Single Family Rehabilitation Loan & Weatherization Grant Programs. Rehabilitation Administration Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 1: Affordable Housing, Objective 1: Invest /reinvest in existing housing stock 2013 Funding Received: $20,000 2014 Funding Recommended: $20,000 -10- Considering Factors: The Village anticipates assisting 10 low- income residents with housing rehabilitation and emergency repairs during FY 2014. Rehabilitation work is also proposed for the group home owned by Search Inc. and rehab work at the CEDA NW facility. Funding for rehabilitation administration will be used for services directly related to a specific project which may include: preparation of work specifications, application and loan processing, inspections and staff's time for other services related to assisting the owners and contractors participating in a rehab project. Funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/15 Program Income Anticipated: None Westgate Road Storm Sewer Improvements (Ironwood Drive to Kensington Road) Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 3: Neighborhood Safety, Objective 1: Public Improvements 2013 Funding Received: n/a 2014 Funding Requested: $125,000 2014 Funding Recommended: $125,000 Considering Factors: This project involves the construction of approximately 175 lin. Feet of 42" diameter storm sewer to replace the existing 36" diameter storm sewer. This area is subject to reoccurring flooding. This improvement will provide a larger storm sewer with added capacity to reduce the risk of flooding by providing a 25 year level of protection. The project is located in a low- mod - income census tract and will serve the entire tributary to the this sewer. The project will be designed, inspected and maintained by the Village Public Works Staff. Funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/15 Program Income Anticipated: n/a Public Parkway Tree Replacement (Within the Village's low- moderate income census tracts) Consolidated Plan Priority: Priority 3: Neighborhood Safety, Objective 1: Public Improvements 2013 Funding Received: $25,000 2014 Funding Requested: $25,000 2014 Funding Recommended: $25,000 Considering Factors: This project involves the replacement of public trees that have been damaged by recent storms and trees that have been lost due to the Emerald Ash Borer infestation. This project will benefit all the residents within the low- to moderate - income census tracts where the work is done. The project will be managed by Village Public Works Staff, who will inventory the plantings and routinely maintain them through their forest management activities. Funding is recommended. Target Completion Date: 9/30/15 Program Income Anticipated: n/a - 11 - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ACTION PLAN 2014 INCLUDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS , the Village of Mount Prospect has prepared a five-year 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan, which includes a community development strategic plan as well as an application for a Community Development Block Grant; and WHEREAS , the Village of Mount Prospect is entering its thirty-fifth year as an entitlement community under the federal Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS , in the past thirty-four years the Village has used its Community Development Block Grant entitlement to implement various projects to address the community development and housing needs of low and moderate-income and elderly residents, to reduce and prevent the occurrence of deterioration in the Village, to increase accessibility for the handicapped, and to address other community needs in conformance with the objectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect expects to be allocated $271,504for fiscal year 2014 from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and expects to generate $60,000 in annual program income, and anticipates non-allocated carry-over funds in the amount of $110,096; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that the Consolidated Plan and the use community and housing needs of its citizens: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby approve the attached 2014 Annual Action Plan. The Action Plan anticipates spending Community Development Block Grant funds in the amount of $441,600. Public Service Programs $ 67,800 Affordable Housing$125,000 Public Infrastructure Improvements 150,000 Public Facility Rehab 12,500 Rehab Administration 20,000 General Administration 66,300 FY 2014 CDBG FUND $441,600 SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby authorize the Village Manager to prepare and forward to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development a submission of Mount Prospect's 2014 Action Plan in accordance with Federal guidelines. This Plan includes an application for FY 2014 federal Community Development Block Grant funds. Page 2/2 CDBG allocations SECTION THREE: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of July 2014. _______________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\WIN\RESOLUTION\CDBGactionplan2010-2014.july2014doc Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE BOARD AND FINANCE COMMISSION FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE: JUNE 17, 2014 PROPOSED CIP: 2015-2019 SUBJECT: Attached hereto is the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The projects being considered for the year 2015 total $12,466,095. The five-year total for all projects is $64,262,026. We encourage you to read the Assistant Village ii. This correspondence describes the purpose of the CIP, highlights some of the more significant projects, and reviews project funding. To help you evaluate our ability to fund the requested projects a five-year financial forecast is provided for the major operating and capital project funds that support funding for the CIP. These forecasts can be found in Tab 9 of the document. In general, the projects being presented directly relate to the monies expected to be available. However, from reviewing the CIP requests in conjunction with the five-year financial forecasts I would like to direct your attention to several project areas. General Fund The CIP is showing first-year projects being paid from the General Fund as $853,391 (A-10). Projects include Ash Tree Removal and Replacement Plantings (F-13 and F-20), New Sidewalks and Sidewalk Cost-Share Program (F-19 and F-24), Storm Sewer Inspection Program (F-21), and various IT projects (G-3 through G-7 and G-9 through G-12). The five- year average for capital projects to be funded from the General Fund is $979,737. The financial forecast for the General Fund is showing an operating deficit in 2015 of $43,000 with annual deficits increasing each subsequent year through 2019 reaching $1.2 million. Each during the appropriate budget cycle with capital projects being deferred as necessary to help eliminate the deficit. See a complete five-year forecast for the General Fund and all other major capital Funds beginning on page H-1 of Tab 9. Capital Improvement Fund The Capital Improvement Fund was created to support intermediate sized capital expenditures for various departments that are non-recurring in nature. Some examples of these projects are detention pond improvements, emergency generators and public building improvements. Supported by a one-quarter cent home rule sales tax, there is approximately $1.2 million annually available for these types of capital projects. A total of $2.5 million in projects are budgeted for 2015. Reserves totaling $1.5 million permit the higher than usual spending for the year. Some larger projects planned for 2015 include Public Works Roof Repair (F-9), KBC Jogging Path (F-10) and Detention Pond Improvements (F-6). Projects included in the five- Proposed CIP June 17, 2014 Page 2 of 3 year plan beyond 2015 will need to be further prioritized with some deferrals to bring the total annual amount down to what can be supported with current revenue streams. Motor Fuel Tax Fund (MFT) The Motor Fuel Tax Fund supports various maintenance programs of village streets. Activities supported include crack filling, pavement markings, salt/calcium chloride purchases, utilities and traffic light maintenance. The MFT Fund also supports a portion of the street resurfacing program. Receipts from motor fuel taxes have been flat for the past several years. Due to a lack of growth in revenue, the amount allotted to the annual street resurfacing program had to be reduced. During 2013, a long-range funding plan was put in place to address the street funding shortfall while eliminating a resurfacing backlog that had grown to over 13 miles. A combination of tax and fee increases along with the reallocation of vehicle sticker monies into the Street Fund reduces the reliance on MFT to support the resurfacing program. Annual spending on street resurfacing during the five-year capital plan is $550,000. Street Improvement Construction Fund Projects This fund supports the annual street resurfacing program and other street-related projects. Funding comes from a quarter-cent home rule sales tax along with the local motor fuel tax and vehicle sticker fees. The current funding plan for street resurfacing was put in place during 2013 due to falling revenues in this and the MFT Fund. A total of $3.9 million is budgeted in 2015, of which $3.7 million is for the annual street resurfacing program. The five-year average for the resurfacing program paid from this fund is $3.9 million. Sufficient funds are projected to be generated annually to support the resurfacing program through 2019. Adjustments to the program may need to be made at that time to ensure adequate funding continues. Flood Control Construction Fund Projects Bond issues in 2013 and 2014 provided funds to complete work recommended by the comprehensive storm water study completed in 2011. Payment on the bonds will come from a quarter cent home rule sales tax. Projects included in the 2015-2019 financial forecast are maintenance in nature and include creek tree trimming and bank stabilization, neighborhood drainage improvements and costs related to the operation of Levee 37. The five-year average funding needs for the flood control program is $345,000. Water and Sewer Fund There are several large capital projects included in the CIP for 2015-2019. The first is the ongoing combined sewer Improvement project started in 2006. The total cost for the project was originally estimated at $15 million and expected to take 10 years to complete. Funding for this project comes from a $5 per month sewer construction fee and basic sewer usage fee. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2015. There is $800,000 budgeted for the final year of the project. Other major projects planned for 2015 is the implementation of a residential AMR system (F-5) and water and sewer main repairs/replacement (F-3 and F-8). H:\ACCT\CIP\CIP 2015-2019\2015-2019 CIP - Board Memo June 2014.docx Proposed CIP June 17, 2014 Page 3 of 3 A joint workshop with the Village Board and Finance Commission to review the CIP is scheduled for July 8. Staff will be on hand to discuss project submittals and their impact on operations. David O. Erb Finance Director Copy: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager Dave Strahl, Assistant Village Manager Lynn Jarog, Deputy Finance Director Department Directors H:\ACCT\CIP\CIP 2015-2019\2015-2019 CIP - Board Memo June 2014.docx Joint Workshop Tuesday, July 8, 2014 6:30 P.M. 2015-2019 Capital Improvements Plan May be viewed on The Village’s website at: http://www.mountprospect.org/index.aspx?page=178