Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4. New Business 06/03/2014Village of Mount Prospeel Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: MAY 23, 2014 SUBJECT: PZ -13 -14 / 421 N. PINE ST. / VARIATION (EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK) The Petitioners are seeking Variation approval to allow a ten and six tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback in order to construct a porch at 421 N. Pine Street. The attached exhibits illustrate the Petitioners' proposed improvements to the existing home, which include a two -story building addition and an unenclosed porch in the exterior side yard. The proposed porch would measure twenty six (26) feet wide by five (5) feet deep. The existing house encroaches into the required exterior side yard. The house is setback fifteen and six tenths (15.6) feet when a minimum of twenty (20) feet is required. Therefore, the proposed porch would be setback ten and six tenths (10.6) feet from the exterior side yard property line, which requires Variation approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, May 22, 2014, and by a vote of 5 -2, recommended approval of a Variation to allow a ten and six tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback in order to construct a porch, as shown in the plans dated October 12, 2013, for the residence at 421 N. Pine Street, subject to the following condition of approval: 1) The porch which extends beyond the existing established setback line shall remain unenclosed. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their June 3, 2014 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. coney, Jr., r CP \ \Vf1 \vh I hcdS\PLAN\Plemdng & Zoning COMM\P &Z 2014\MEl Memos\PZ -13 -14 421 N Pine S1. (VAR - Exterior Side Yard Setback) docx Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: CONSUELO ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: MAY 28, 2014 SUBJECT: HISTORY OF EXTERIOR SIDE YARD VARIATION REQUESTS FOR BUILDING ADDITIONS & PORCHES The history of exterior side yard setback Variations indicates there were six requests that were approved in order to allow either a building addition or porch to encroach into the required exterior side yard. All of the zoning requests included a negative recommendation from Staff, but were approved by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Village Board. Exterior Side Yard Setback Variation Requests: Case # Address Zoning Exterior Side Yard Variation Request to Resolution/ Setback Required Exterior Side Yard Ordinance # Setback PZ-08-03 312 N. Oak St. RX 25’ 20’ for bldg. addition R-08-03 PZ-34-03 300 Hi Lusi Ave. RA 20’ 19’6” for bldg. addition R-34-03 PZ-17-04 500 S. Pine St. RA 20’ 16’ for a porch R-17-04 PZ-45-04 701 E .Sha-RA 20’ 15’2” for bdlg. addition R-45-04 Bonee Tl. PZ-12-10 1 S. William St. RA 20’ 12.19’ for a two story bldg. Ord. No. 5818 addition PZ-10-14 401 Wa Pella RA 20’ 18.1’ for a porch R-10-14 Ave. The current exterior side yard Variation request is for the property located at 421 S. Pine Street: PZ-13-14 421 N. Pine RA 20’ 10.6’ for a porch Under Review None of the Variation approvals granted are located within a quarter of a mile of 421 N. Pine Street. The closest property, 312 N. Oak Street, is located within half a mile of 421 N. Pine Street One. Please forward this memorandum and attachment to the Village Board for their review and consideration of PZ-13-14 at their June 3, 2014. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. _______________________ Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner c:\users\npietrzy\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\content.outlook\qgop8s1g\exterior side yard variations (3).docx History of Exterior Side Yard Variations May 28, 2014 Page 2 ϰϮϭE͘WŝŶĞ^ƚ͘ c:\users\npietrzy\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\content.outlook\qgop8s1g\exterior side yard variations (3).docx Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -13 -14 FILE COPY VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT LOCATION: PETITIONERS:. OWNERS: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 421 N. Pine Street Drew Klee and Danielle Zimny Drew Klee and Danielle Zimny 03 -34- 130 - 001 -0000 0.14 acres (6,035 square feet) RA Single Family Residence Single Family Residential Variation - Exterior Side Yard Setback LOCATION MAP �I A ,17 r }� 41 7"' . J { 16 X17 '15- F. a��; r`$ r R . 14 45 A 12 r ,rte 7\Ynu01at 1711,11- :507 "► 5 1 545 ,; y ► +:.t, 5A M WE �x 1 501 X21 Village of Mount Prospect Nloo ll'Ro Community Development Department M� MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER MAY 13, 2014 MAY 22, 2014 PZ -13 -14 / 421 N. PINE ST. / VARIATION (EXTERIOR SIDE YARD) A public hearing has been scheduled for the May 22, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Drew Klee and Danielle Zimny (the "Petitioners ") regarding the property located at 421 N. Pine Street (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioners are seeking a Variation to the exterior side yard setback in order to construct a porch. The P &Z hearing was properly noticed in the May 7, 2014 edition of the Daily Herald Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the southeast corner of the Pine Street and Memory Lane. The Subject Property contains a single- family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA district. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The attached exhibits illustrate the Petitioners' proposed improvements. The Petitioners plan to remove the one - story portion of the home and the detached garage: A two -story building addition, including an attached garage, would be constructed in their places. The proposed improvements also include replacing the existing wood porch located in the exterior side yard with an unenclosed porch: The existing wood porch measures six (6) feet wide by four (4) feet deep. The proposed porch would measure twenty six (26) feet wide by five (5) feet deep. The site plan indicates the porch would be setback ten and six tenths (10.6) feet from the exterior side yard property line when a minimum of twenty (20) feet is required. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The Subject Property currently does not comply with the Village's zoning regulations. The Plat of Survey indicates the home and detached garage do not comply with all of the required setbacks. The home is setback fifteen and six tenths (15.6) feet from the exterior side property line when the Village Code requires a minimum of twenty (20) feet. The detached garage is setback two and six tenths (2.6) feet when a minimum (3) feet is required. PZ -13 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting May 22, 2014 Page 2 Staff could not locate the building permit for the construction of the home. However, the home was built prior to the current zoning requirements. The Subject Property is in an area of the Village that was annexed in 1925. Based on the building permit history for the construction of some of the adjacent homes, the Subject Property was likely developed between the late 1940s and early 1950s. The twenty (20) foot exterior side yard setback requirement was added to the Village Code in November 20, 1979 (Ord. 2960). Besides the Variation request for the exterior side yard setback, the proposed improvements would comply with the RA bulk requirements, including floor area ratio and overall lot coverage. The following table compares the existing and proposed improvements to the RA Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. The italicized text denotes items that require zoning relief from the Village Code's bulk regulations. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Per the Petitioners, the Subject Property is located on a corner with the home's entrance located on the exterior side yard versus the front, which limits their ability to have a porch. They would like to construct a porch for privacy and security, as well as limit the weather related beatings the home endures along the north building elevation. The Petitioners further state that the Subject Property is unique because the home is on a corner lot with the entrance facing the exterior side yard. The Subject Property's characteristics are typical of most corner lots in the Village. Several homes are located on corner lots and are oriented towards the exterior side yard. Others also include nonconforming exterior side yard setbacks. For example, the corner properties adjacent to the Subject Property are oriented towards the exterior side yards and include non - conforming exterior side yard setbacks. The Petitioners would like to construct a porch further increasing the encroachment into the required exterior side yard. The Variation request does not meet the standards for a Variation because there is no hardship as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. The home's orientation and presence of a non - conforming setback do not constitute hardships. The Petitioners have the option to construct a porch /stoop measuring no more than eight (8) feet wide by five (5) feet deep as the Village Code permits such a structure as a permitted encroachment. RA Single Family District Requirements Existing Proposed Setbacks: Front (west) Min. 30' 34.1' No Change Exterior Side (north) Min. 20' 15.6 10.6' Interior Side south Min. 5' _ 10' 5.15' Rear east Min. 25' 39.3' No Chan e F.A.R Max. .5 (3,017 sq.ft) .28 (1,670 sq.ft) .45 (2,739 sq.ft.) Lot Coverage Max. 50% (3,017 sq.ft.) 33.5% (2,022 sq.ft.) 35.59% (2,148 sq.ft.) VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Per the Petitioners, the Subject Property is located on a corner with the home's entrance located on the exterior side yard versus the front, which limits their ability to have a porch. They would like to construct a porch for privacy and security, as well as limit the weather related beatings the home endures along the north building elevation. The Petitioners further state that the Subject Property is unique because the home is on a corner lot with the entrance facing the exterior side yard. The Subject Property's characteristics are typical of most corner lots in the Village. Several homes are located on corner lots and are oriented towards the exterior side yard. Others also include nonconforming exterior side yard setbacks. For example, the corner properties adjacent to the Subject Property are oriented towards the exterior side yards and include non - conforming exterior side yard setbacks. The Petitioners would like to construct a porch further increasing the encroachment into the required exterior side yard. The Variation request does not meet the standards for a Variation because there is no hardship as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. The home's orientation and presence of a non - conforming setback do not constitute hardships. The Petitioners have the option to construct a porch /stoop measuring no more than eight (8) feet wide by five (5) feet deep as the Village Code permits such a structure as a permitted encroachment. PZ -13 -14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting May 22, 2014 RECOMMENDATION Page 3 Based on staff's analysis, the Variation request does not meet the standards for a Variation contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance for the reasons noted above. Therefore, Staff recommends that the P &Z recommend denial of the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a ten and six tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback, as shown in the attached plans dated October 12, 2013 for the residence at 421 N. Pine Street." The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: f �V� William J. Cooney, AIC 7evelopment Director of Community /it HAPLAMPIanning & Zoning CONU" &Z 2014VStaff Reporls\PZ -13 -14 421 N Pine SL(VAR- Exterior Side Yard) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -13 -14 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: May 22, 2014 421 Pine Street Drew Klee and Danielle Zimny May 7, 2014 03 -34- 130 - 001 -0000 Variation - Exterior Side Yard Setback Joseph Donnelly, Chair Norbert Mizwicki William Beattie Keith Youngquist Sharon Otteman Thomas Fitzgerald Agostino Filippone Jeanne Kueter None Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development Drew Klee and Danielle Zimny Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Commissioner Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Miczwicki to approve the minutes of the April 20, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 5 -0 with two Commissioners abstaining. After hearing one (1) previous case Chairman Donnelly introduced case PZ- 13 -14, 421 North Pine Street. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioners for PZ -13 -14 are seeking a Variation to the exterior side yard setback in order to construct a porch at 421 North Pine Street. Ms. Andrade explained the Subject Property is located on the southeast corner of Pine Street and Memory Lane. The Subject Property contains a single- family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA district. Planning and Zoning Commission May 22, 2014 PZ -13 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Ms. Andrade stated that the Subject Property currently does not comply with the Village Code's exterior side setback requirement. The home is setback fifteen and six tenths (15.6) feet from the exterior side property line when the Village Code requires a minimum of twenty (20) feet. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioners plan to remove the one story one -story portion of the home and the detached garage in order to construct a two -story building addition. The proposed improvements also include replacing the existing wood porch located in the exterior side yard with an unenclosed porch. The proposed porch would measure twenty six (26) feet wide by five (5) feet deep and would be setback ten and six tenths (10.6) feet from the exterior side yard property line when a minimum of twenty (20) feet is required. Ms. Andrade explained the proposed exterior side yard elevation plan indicates the porch would extend approximately half the width of the building. Ms. Andrade showed the following table comparing the existing and proposed improvements to the RA Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. She further stated the proposed improvements would comply with the RA bulk requirements. Ms. Andrade stated that the standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following is a summary of these findings: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Ms. Andrade stated per the Petitioners, the Subject Property is located on a corner with the home's entrance located on the exterior side yard versus the front, which limits their ability to have a porch. She further explained they would like to construct a porch for privacy and security, as well as limit the weather related beatings the home endures along the north building elevation. The Petitioners further stated that the Subject Property is unique because the home is on a corner lot with the entrance facing the exterior side yard. Ms. Andrade stated that the Subject Property's characteristics are typical of most corner lots in the Village. Several homes are located on corner lots and are oriented towards the exterior side Planning and Zoning Commission May 22, 2014 PZ -13 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman RA Single Family District Requirements Existing Proposed Setbacks: Front (west) Min. 30' 34.1' No Change Exterior Side (north) Min. 20' 15.6' 10.6' Interior Side 'south Min. 5' 10' 5.15' Rear (east) Min. 25' 39.3' No Change F.A.R Max. .5 (3,017 sq.ft) .28 (1,670 sq.ft) .45 (2,739 sq.ft.) Lot Coverage Max. 50% (3,017 sq.ft.) 33.5% (2,022 sq.ft.) 35.59% (2,148 sq.ft.) Ms. Andrade stated that the standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following is a summary of these findings: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Ms. Andrade stated per the Petitioners, the Subject Property is located on a corner with the home's entrance located on the exterior side yard versus the front, which limits their ability to have a porch. She further explained they would like to construct a porch for privacy and security, as well as limit the weather related beatings the home endures along the north building elevation. The Petitioners further stated that the Subject Property is unique because the home is on a corner lot with the entrance facing the exterior side yard. Ms. Andrade stated that the Subject Property's characteristics are typical of most corner lots in the Village. Several homes are located on corner lots and are oriented towards the exterior side Planning and Zoning Commission May 22, 2014 PZ -13 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman yard. Others also include nonconforming exterior side yard setbacks. For example, the corner properties adjacent to the Subject Property are oriented towards the exterior side yards and include non - conforming exterior side yard setbacks. The Petitioners would like to construct a porch further increasing the encroachment into the required exterior side yard. The Variation request does not meet the standards for a Variation because there is no hardship as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. The home's orientation and presence of a non - conforming setback do not constitute hardships. The Petitioners have the option to construct a porch/stoop measuring no more than eight (8) feet wide by five (5) feet deep as the Village Code permits such a structure as a permitted encroachment. Ms. Andrade stated based on the Staff s analysis, staff does not feel the request meet the Variation standards. Therefore, Staff recommends that the P &Z recommend denial of the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a ten and six tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback, as shown in the attached plans dated October 12, 2013 for the residence at 421 N. Pine Street." Ms. Andrade stated that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Chairman Donnelly asked if the board if they had any questions for Staff. Commissioner Youngquist asked why the plat of survey shows a ten foot (10') building line along the north end of the property. Mr. Simmons stated that when the property was platted the zoning regulations didn't specify a twenty (20) foot setback in the area. He further explained that the requirements might have changed since it was originally platted. Ms. Andrade stated that the home was constructed in the late 1940's and the twenty (20) foot exterior side yard setback was added to the code in 1979. Chairman Donnelly stated per the drawings the second floor addition looks like it will extend further towards the street. Ms. Andrade stated that the two story addition would be setback sixteen and seven tenths (16.7) feet from the exterior side yard setback. Mr. Simmons stated that the Village's Zoning Code has provisions for lots that are fifty five (55) feet in width or less which would apply to the Subject Property because it only has a forty five (45) foot frontage along Pine Street. It allows the homeowner to expand the structure and maintain an existing non - conforming setback as long as it doesn't increase the extent of the non- conformity. Mr. Simmons further explained that the existing home is currently setback at fifteen and six tenths (15.6) feet and the two story addition would be situated behind that existing setback. By code the petitioner can build the two story addition because they won't be encroaching further into the setback. Mr. Simmons clarified that the Petitioner doesn't need a Variation for the two story addition because it is within the established setback; the proposed porch does need the Variation because it encroaches further upon the setback. Planning and Zoning Commission May 22, 2014 PZ -13 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Commissioner Beattie asked how far a front stoop can encroach into the side yard. Ms. Andrade stated that a front stoop can encroach five (5) feet into the side yard. Commissioner Miczwicki asked if the stairs leading to the stoop is included in the five (5) foot measurement. Mr. Simmons clarified that the stoop itself can encroach only five (5) feet but the steps can be however many are required to get up to the height of the stoop. Chairman Donnelly called the Petitioner to the stand and swore in Drew Klee 421 N. Pine Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056. Mr. Klee stated that the addition is needed for his growing family. He stated that the home is a Georgian style with a one story addition, which currently is an office space. He explained that they want to get rid of the one story addition and add much needed new space. Mr. Klee stated that they are requesting to increase the size of the front stoop in order to have more outdoor space. Mr. Klee stated that they are requesting to encroach only an additional six (6) inches from where the current stoop exists. He showed some pictures of the current and proposed stoop. Mr. Klee explained that the increased stoop would be in line with the current landscaping line of the home. He stated that the "look" of the proposed stoop will not be much different than what is currently there. Mr. Klee stated they purchased the home in 2007 and have done various improvements; however, they want to keep investing in the home and the community. He thanked the board for their time and consideration. Chairman Donnelly asked Staff if the board could add a condition limiting the variance to the proposed measurements of the stoop so the homeowners can't increase the size in the future without requesting another variance. Ms. Andrade stated the condition could be specific to the setback proposed as per the drawings. Commissioner Youngquist asked the Petitioner if he considered making the porch smaller. The Petitioner stated he did, but thinks the proposed size will look more aesthetically pleasing with the other improvements that are going to be done to the house. Commissioner Youngquist stated he doesn't agree with the proposal and that he believes a smaller porch would fit in with the current style of the home. Commissioner Filippone clarified that even though the porch will extend and additional six inches the porch will be built the entire length of the front of the home. Mr. Klee stated that was correct. Commissioner Youngquist stated that he feels that is too large of a front porch close to the sidewalk. There was general discussion about other homes in the neighborhood that have similar porches. Planning and Zoning Commission May 22, 2014 PZ -13 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Chairman Donnelly asked if there was anyone else in attendance that wanted to discuss the case. Hearing none he closed the public portion of the case and brought the discussion back to the board. Commissioner Fitzgerald made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie: "To approve a Variation to allow a ten and six tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback, as shown in the attached plans dated October 12, 2013 for the residence at 421 N. Pine Street; with the condition that that the porch area can't be enclosed." Chairman Donnelly stated the case is Village Board Final. UPON ROLL CALL AYES Beattie, Kueter, Miczwiki, Otteman, Donnelly NAYS Fitzgerald, Youngquist The motion was approved 5 -2 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. After hearing additional cases Commissioner Fitzgerald made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie and the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 pm. JetWa Moder Administrative Assistant Planning and Zoning Commission May 22, 2014 PZ -13 -14 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman 6415 N. Caldwell Ave. Phone (773) 631 -5285 Chicago, IL 60646 &, Central Survey LLG Fax (773) 775 -2071 www.Centraisurvey.com Legal Description Lot 48 in H. Roy Berry Company's First Addition to Castle Heights, a Subdivision of the South % of the Southeast %4 of the Northwest %4 and the North 95.02 feet of the East 1 /5 of the Southwest 11 /a, all in Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illnois Commonly Known as: 421 N. Pine St., Mt. Prospect, Illinois Area of Land Described: 6,035 Sq. Ft. W. M emory Lane I Asphalt oor_va oecmavmchc 002 -114 008 1 0 9 7- j 1] 2" 017 3 04 -1/2 025 3" 0] 9' .05 o/8 033 4' 083' 10" 06 -3/4 042 092' it OT _ ]18 050 6" 100 12 NOTE: Property corners were NOT staked per customer. Possible not all improvements shown due to snow cover. Scale: 1 Inch equals 15 Feet Ordered Bv: Drew Klee Order Number: 027 E Assume no dimension from scaling upon this plat. Compare all points before bullding and report any difference at once. For building restrictions refer to your abstract, used, onntract and loca or CoMrete Curb =19 L Asohall on- Can ie i v 5.09, �� = so °oo'4r' m .' —34.14 5.09'; / i /�/ v concrete hsaes j 2.70' 2.67' R-lim s= 131.66' �\ I m 2 R. 1 0 sI � Profand r Savth FaceW Od Fence POSt 0.70'N ; Su rveyor I t _C State of . h Illinois O South Fs. Weod Fence Post O Line & d, tine Fxtentlo0 Southeast Fece Wood Fence Post 0 6T E & 051' S. 'Ca U '- o 8 )S. 8 to current Illinos minimum standards L eaend oor_va oecmavmchc 002 -114 008 1 0 9 7- j 1] 2" 017 3 04 -1/2 025 3" 0] 9' .05 o/8 033 4' 083' 10" 06 -3/4 042 092' it OT _ ]18 050 6" 100 12 NOTE: Property corners were NOT staked per customer. Possible not all improvements shown due to snow cover. Scale: 1 Inch equals 15 Feet Ordered Bv: Drew Klee Order Number: 027 E Assume no dimension from scaling upon this plat. Compare all points before bullding and report any difference at once. For building restrictions refer to your abstract, used, onntract and loca or CoMrete Curb =19 L Asohall on- — - _34.21'....- v 5.09, �� / $t0� lily E s e �i cli ��L m m .' —34.14 5.09'; / i /�/ v concrete hsaes j 2.70' 2.67' R-lim s= 131.66' �\ 2 R. 1 0 sI � Profand r Savth FaceW Od Fence POSt 0.70'N ; Su rveyor ce North Face Abud Fer Pc.t 0.. 11's t _C State of . h Illinois O South Fs. Weod Fence Post O Line & d, tine Fxtentlo0 Southeast Fece Wood Fence Post 0 6T E & 051' S. 'Ca U '- State of Illinois T he prr f ss conf rms - )S. 8 to current Illinos minimum standards L eaend County of Cook ) for a b nary mey. N. North S. = South Central Survey TLC does hereby certify that an on the ground survey per record description of E. = East the land shown hereon was performed on Marsh 13, 2014 and that the map or plat hereon drawn is W, = West a correct representation of said survey. When bearings are shown the bearing base is assumed. (TYP) = Typical Dimensions are shown in feet and hundredths and are correct at a temperature of 68° Fahrenheit. Rec = Record M ss - ��✓ St. eet Dated this 13th day of March 2014 ti/ l2 Ave. = Avenue William R. Webb P.L.S. x2190 (exp.1113012014) Professional Design Firm Land Surveying LLC (#184004113) M M i a fix I _ -- ..r Al _ e V «. tai.ue re WALL 5FL Ol�h� t fix ..r Al _ e V «. tai.ue re i -- JddH IL All £Z 9 - _� \� \� \ /! � R \ \\ �i 'tom_ y I 's� GENERAL NQTEB ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION (EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 421 NORTH PINE STREET, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Drew Klee and Danielle Zimny (Petitioners), have filed a petition for a Variation to allow for a ten and sixth-tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback for property located at 421 North Pine Street (Property) and legally described as: South ½ of  the Southeast ¼ of the Northwest ¼ and the North 95.02 feet of the East ½ of the Southwest ¼, all in Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois Commonly Known as: 421 N. Pine St., Mt. Prospect, Illinois. Area of Land Described: 6,035 Sq. Ft. Property Index Number 03-34-130-001-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation to allow a ten and six-tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback for the construction of an unenclosed porch as shown on tSite Plan dated October 12, 2013 and ; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of PZ-13-14 before the nd Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the22 day of May, 2014, pursuant to th proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 7 day of May 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-13-14; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the request meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the Variation to allow a ten and six-tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback for the construction of an unenclosed porch would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation to allow a ten and six-tenths (10.6) foot exterior side yard setback as shown on the Site Plan dated October 12, 2013 for the property located at 421 North Pine Street with the condition that the porch remain unenclosed. SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 2014. ______________________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk M M i a fix I _ -- ..r Al _ e V «. tai.ue re WALL 5FL Ol�h� t fix ..r Al _ e V «. tai.ue re