HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. Old Business 08/20/2013TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: AUGUST 14, 2013
SUBJECT: MENARDS' FOLLOW UP
The Village Board raised several concerns at their August 6 meeting related to Menards' requested
zoning variances. The concerns pertained to lighting, parking and maintenance of the rear
easement/landscaped area. The petitioner has provided responses to each of these concerns which
are summarized below.
Liahtina
As of this time, the petitioner has not submitted information documenting why they can't meet Village
Code requirements related to lighting levels on the property. They have indicated that their lighting
consultant will have an update available for the August 20 meeting.
Parkin
The Board expressed concerns with the proposed reduction of parking spaces from 339 to 293 and
requested that the petitioner look for areas that additional spaces could be land banked on the property.
The petitioner has submitted a revised site plan that depicts 21 spaces that could be located on the
north side of the property off of the Harvest Lane entrance drive. These spaces could be added in the
future if determined necessary by the Village. The revised site plan also depicts where the employee
parking will be designated.
Mainten Issues
Several Trustees noted that residents that live to the east of Menards have raised concerns with the
lack of maintenance of the 20' landscaped easement area between them. The lack of maintenance has
led to clogged storm water inlets and landscaping materials falling into adjacent yards. Historically, the
Village has responded to similar complaints and has worked with Menards to address all concerns.
Staff did walk the easement area last week and found that it was in relatively good condition but would
benefit from some minor tree trimming. The petitioner has drafted an internal memo (attached) that
provides the on -site Manager with guidelines for the maintenance of the easement area moving
forward.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their August 20 meeting. Staff will be present at this meeting to answer any
questions related to this matter.
(
William J. Co ney, AICP
Director of Community Devel pment
BUSINESS - CENTER DRIVE Ip5;1N m J°
ws
��µom
o
I 1n m
N
I/
"M1 ! m in o z
4
�ua
f
x �
i') "f i �f ;r'"
d
� p,f o
C)
,m
H
A �
n
ago ,
J
a
z
WAREHOUSE ADDITION
e
p M
J�
ff
�
Nynr�' i$
To: Menards General Manager — Mount Prospect, Illinois
From: Mike Simonds
Re: Landscape and Storm Water Maintenance Program
General Manager,
Per our land use approvals with the Village of Mount Prospect, we are required to
maintain the 20' landscaped area behind the Menards store (eastern property line).
Within this landscaped area is a storm sewer pipe with four (4) catch basins that also need
to be maintained. Below is a summary of the required maintenance that needs to be
performed in this area:
When contracting with a landscape contractor have them include at a minimum
the following; mowing of the grass, picking up debris and picking up sticks, every
other week.
- Walk this landscaped area at least once per month to determine if the landscaped
area is being properly maintained, or more often as deemed necessary.
- Contract for tree trimming services at least once per year, or more as deemed
necessary, to trim dead branches from the trees within this landscaped area.
- Remove and replace dead trees with a comparable species upon finding the dead
tree.
- Contract for storm sewer inspections every spring to determine if debris has
clogged the catch basins and/or pipes. If clogged contract for storm sewer
cleaning services.
Should you have any questions regarding this landscaped area please don't hesitate to
contact the Properties Department at 715-876-2532.
Sincerely,
Mike Simonds
Real Estate Representative
Menard, Inc.
Phone: 715-876-2984
Village of Mount Prospectx
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 26, 2013
SUBJECT: PZ -08 -13 / 730 & 740 RAND ROAD / AMENDMENT TO PUD & VARIATIONS
(PARKING & LIGHTING) / MENARDS
The Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Subject Property was last amended in 2012 to allow
Menards' expansion of the garden center, warehouse, and outdoor yard (Ord. No. 6025). Variations
approved as part of the 2012 amendment included a parking Variation to allow 339 parking spaces.
Menards has revised the site plan in order to accommodate the required storm water detention. The
revised site plan indicates 293 parking spaces would be provided, which requires a new Variation. The
Petitioner also seeks Variations to the increase the lighting at the property lines and within the parking
lot areas.
The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the requests on Thursday,
July 25, 2013, and by a vote of 6 -0, recommended approval of the following motions:
A. An amendment to Ord. #6025 which granted a Conditional Use to amend the Planned Unit
Development to allow the expansion of the garden center, warehouse, and outdoor yard.
B. A Variation to reduce the required off - street parking to 293 parking spaces.
C. A Variation to increase the illumination levels at the property lines from .5 foot - candles up to .7
foot - candles at the north property line, up to 1.2 foot - candles at the west property line, and up
to 2.4 foot - candles at the south property line.
D. A Variation to increase the parking lot uniformity levels from 3:1 (ave. /min.) and 12:1
(max. /min.) to 9.7:1 (ave. /min.) and 37.7:1 (max. /min.); and
E. A Variation request to increase the parking lot maximum average illumination level from 2.4
foot - candles to 2.9 foot - candles.
Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing
are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village
Board for their review and consideration at their August 6, 2013 meeting. Staff will be present to
answer any questions related to this matter.
William J. Cioney, Jr., Al f P
' 6 J4 i 1 , , ian r d [i1 16l 1 ?r u lJ I ) 6 , 1 p 8oc,
July 29, 2013
Bill Cooney
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 -3218
Re PZ -08 -13
Request to Waive 2 nd Reading
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Dear Mr. Cooney:
Menard, Inc. is requesting the Village Board waive the second reading and take final action for
case PZ -08 -13 at the August 6 2013 meeting.
If there is any additional information that I can provide, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
Menard, IN
Real Estate I�vp t c „q rt, 've
Menard, Inc.
5101 Menard Drive
Eau Claire, WI 54703
Phone: 715- 876 -2984
Fax: 715- 876 -5998
Email: msimonds(a4menard- inc.com
CC: Brian Simmons — Deputy Director — Village of Mount Prospect (via email)
Consuelo Andrade — Senior Planner — Village of Mount Prospect (via email)
5101 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 -9625 PHONE (715) 876 -5911 FAX (715) 876 -2868
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CASE NO. PZ -08 -13
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
PETITIONER:
PUBLICATION DATE:
PIN NUMBER:
Hearing Date: July 25, 2013
730 & 740 E. Rand Road
Menard, Inc.- Michael Simonds
July 10, 2013
03 -35- 300 - 031 -0000, 03 -35- 300 - 033 -0000, 03-35- 300 -034-
0000, 03 -35- 300 - 036 -0000, 03 -35- 300 - 038 -0000, 03 -35-
300- 032 -0000
REQUEST(S): Amend Ord. #6025 which granted a Conditional Use to
amend the Planned Unit Development to allow the
expansion of the garden center, warehouse, and outdoor yard
& Variations (Parking & Lighting Requirements)
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Joseph Donnelly, Chair
Tom Fitzgerald
William Beattie
Jacqueline Hinaber
Leo Floros
Sharon Otteman
Keith Youngquist
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development
INTERESTED PARTIES: Menard, Inc.- Michael Simonds
Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Commissioner Beattie made a motion,
seconded by Commissioner Hinaber to approve the minutes of the June 27, 2013 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 6 -0. After hearing four (5) previous cases Chairman
Donnelly introduced Case PZ -08 -13 730 & 740 E. Rand Road and explained the case is Village Board
final.
Mr. Simmons explained the property at 730 & 740 E. Rand Road came before the Planning and Zoning
Commission last year to amend the PUD to propose an expansion of the property. As the Petitioner has
started the permit process they have discovered additional Variations are needed continue the project.
Mr. Simmons stated the existing site conditions consist of the existing Menards property, the Lube Pros
site, and the former Aldi building which has recently been demolished.
Mr. Simmons explained that the 2012 plan included an expansion of the outdoor garden center and
reconfiguration of the lumber yard which are on the south and north sides of the property. He also stated
the property received a parking variation to reduce their required onsite parking to 339 spaces.
Mr. Simmons stated the Petitioner has realized additional storm water detention is required on the site;
therefore, the Petitioner has revised their plan to include more onsite detention. Mr. Simmons explained
the Petitioner is requesting to construct two retention ponds on the north side of the property along
Harvest Lane and Business Center Drive which will provide adequate storm water detention for the
project and the impervious surface as proposed. As part of the revised plan additional parking spaces will
need to be eliminated from the site. He stated the parking spaces will decrease to 293 parking spaces from
339 spaces.
Mr. Simmons stated the Petitioner provided a parking study stating that similar sized local stores
demanded about 200 parking spaces; therefore, Staff believes 293 parking spaces would still be adequate
for the proposed location.
Mr. Simmons explained the Petitioner also developed a photometric plan in order to light the property. As
required by code adequate parking lot lighting and building lighting is required. As proposed the
Petitioner is requesting variations to the lighting regulations including increasing the maximum lot line
illumination levels along the Rand Road and Harvest Lane frontages, and also the south property line
which abuts the Brunswick Zone and adjacent banquet facility.
Mr. Simmons stated the Petitioner is also requesting variations to the primary parking lot area regarding
the average parking lot lighting for the entire lot and the proposed uniformity levels. He showed the table
below comparing the code requirements versus Petitioner's request:
Mr. Simmons stated the code provides standards of how Conditional Uses can be supported he
summarized the findings as:
• The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals,
comfort or general welfare;
• The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in
the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
• There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize
congestion on Village streets; and
• The request is in compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances.
Mr. Simmons stated Staff finds the request to Amend Ord. #6025, which granted a Conditional Use to
amend the Planned Unit Development to allow the expansion of the garden center, warehouse, and
outdoor yard satisfies the standards for a Conditional Use. Besides the reduction in parking to
Requirement
Proposal
Parking Spaces
339
293
Lighting
_.. m....._ _ ....
,.,_ ».... -.. _ . _ --
_......._ .. _...a _____ —� ._.
.7 fool-candles (north lot line)
At Property Lines
Max. .5 foot - candles
1.2 foot - candles (west lot line)
2.4 foot- candles (south lot line)
... Parking Lot
Min. average .2 foot-candles _...... .........n
.,. ,. _. _ .._� s .._... Wm.. _... __
.3 foot- candles -candle
s
Max. average 2.4 foot - candles
2.9 foot- candles
Parking Lot
Max. 3:1 (avg. /min.)
9.7.•1 (avg. /min.)
Uniformity Levels
M_ ax. 12: (max. /min.)
37.7:1 (max. /min.)
"Overall
" Max. 5 fo ot - candles
2.. 3 foot- candles
Mr. Simmons stated the code provides standards of how Conditional Uses can be supported he
summarized the findings as:
• The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals,
comfort or general welfare;
• The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in
the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
• There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize
congestion on Village streets; and
• The request is in compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances.
Mr. Simmons stated Staff finds the request to Amend Ord. #6025, which granted a Conditional Use to
amend the Planned Unit Development to allow the expansion of the garden center, warehouse, and
outdoor yard satisfies the standards for a Conditional Use. Besides the reduction in parking to
accommodate the storm water detention, there have been no changes to the project since the project
received the zoning approvals in 2012. The expansion would be in compliance with the provisions of the
Village's Comprehensive Plan. The Village's Comprehensive Plan calls for the subject property to be
utilized for Community Commercial land uses which encourages "large -scale big box and mixed use type
developments." The proposed Menards retail building is compatible with this land use designation. The
expansion project was designed in a manner to contain its operations on the Subject Property and not
impede the orderly development of adjacent properties. Access to the storage area will be limited to
traffic already on the property and will not provide additional access points from Harvest Lane or Rand
Road. Parking lot cross connections are also provided to the parcels containing Lube Pros, Brunswick,
and the Frankie's restaurant to provide for sufficient access and egress from the property.
Mr. Simmons stated based off Staff's review the proposed project meets the intent of the Conditional Use
Standards and therefore recommends support of the proposed amendment.
Mr. Simmons addressed the lighting variations next. Ile stated the Variation Standards found in the code
are summarized as followed:
• A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific
property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by
any person presently having an interest in the property;
• Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
• Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
Mr. Simmons also stated the Petitioner requires relief from the parking regulations. He stated that Staff
asked the Petitioner to provide a site plan that would show how the site could be parked in the future if
the outdoor storage area and garden center were eliminated and it was strictly a retail use. He commented
that parking spaces could be added back into the property that would meet the code requirements.
Therefore, Staff is in support of the parking variation.
Mr. Simmons stated the lighting requirements could be modified to meet code. He stated other
commercial properties within the Village have been able to meet the Village's lighting requirements;
therefore, the Variation requests do not meet the standards for a Variation. There are no unique
circumstances at the Subject Property that would not be applicable to other commercial properties. The
Staff recommends denial of this request.
Mr. Simmons stated that the Village Board decision is final for this case.
Chairman Donnelly inquired if staff had looked at underground water detention options as oppose to
detention ponds. There was a general discussion.
Commissioner Beattie questioned if the size of the stores in the parking survey conducted was
comparable to the Mount Prospect store.
Mr. Simmons stated that the size of the stores were comparable, if not larger than the Subject Property,.
There was general discussion regarding the parking requirements.
Commissioner Hinaber asked if Menards has had complaints of not enough parking spaces.
Mr. Simmons stated that the Petitioner could give more detail; however, the existing site shared parking
with the former Aldi building and now Menards would be the sole retailer in that site.
Commissioner Hinaber asked if the Village Mount Prospect has conducted a parking study similar to the
one provided by the Petitioner.
Mr. Simmons stated that the parking survey is required by the petitioner to act as justification for the
request and that the Village doesn't conduct their own survey.
Chairman Donnelly called the Petitioner to the stand. He swore in Michael Simonds 5101 Menard Drive,
Au Claire Wisconsin.
Mr. Simonds stated that the parking study compared the proposed expansion to two other stores similar in
size and sales volume. He addressed the staff's comment regarding the underground detention as oppose
to the above ground detention. He explained currently all of the detention is underground, and that the
cost difference between the two is significant. He also stated that Menards is changing its philosophy and
gearing towards above ground water detention ponds.
Mr. Simonds addressed the comment regarding the number of parking stalls needed for the employees
and customers. He assured the board that 200 parking stalls is more than enough to accommodate roughly
40 -50 employee cars and the customers. He explained the cost benefit for keeping the water detention
above ground and losing some parking stalls outweighed the cost of putting in underground water
detention.
Mr. Simonds stated that if the site were to be sold to another developer for another use other than a home
improvement store the lumber storage would be eliminated which would add to the already existing
parking stalls.
There was general discussion regarding the parking stalls versus more inventory in the store.
Chairman Donnelly asked if they would temporarily take additional parking stall away for seasonal sales.
Mr. Simonds stated Menards seasonal sales are done internally in the store.
Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any further questions regarding the parking request. Hearing none
he asked Mr. Simonds to address the lighting aspect of the proposal.
Mr. Simonds stated that he feels the proposed photometric plan creates a safe site that is viewable by
traffic. He stated the brightest points are located at the highest traffic areas on the site. He stated they
consist of code compliant fixtures.
There was general discussion regarding the lighting fixtures being used in the project.
Mr. Simonds explained the hot spots are located off of Harvest Lane, Rand Road, and the south entrance
by the lumber yard. This helps the overall safety of the site. He further explained that the hot spot located
in the back south corner are contained by a roof enclosure and a fence which is also heavily landscaped to
help prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties.
Chairman Donnelly asked if the fixtures could be changed if residents were to complain.
Mr. Simonds stated the light would be parallel the ground and be able to be adjusted if needed.
Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any other questions for the Petitioner or staff, hearing none he
opened the public portion of the meeting.
Chairman Donnelly swore in Richard Benson 2020 Autumn Lane. Mr. Benson stated his home is
immediately behind the existing wall and is the president of the Harvest Lane Homeowners Association.
Mr. Benson stated it is not appropriate to have the wall bordering a residential area. He is concerned about
the construction of the additional wall along Harvest Lane.
Mr. Besnon inquired about the sidewalk that is along the north side of the property that the majority of the
residents use. He stated the proposal suggests to modifying the sidewalk to put in a retention pond. He is
concerned that this will eliminate the sidewalk.
Mr. Benson stated there are issues with the existing storm water retention system that is built to hold
storm water along the property lines along the fence of the property owners. He stated the underground
detention system gets clogged from landscaping debris and floods when it rains heavily.
Mr. Benson explained the landscaping behind the wall is not maintained and a lot of debris and dying
trees remain on the property. He is concerned if the addition of the wall is approved there will be more
debris and the issue will be even more out of control. He also discussed the issue of semi - trucks dropping
off shipments during the middle of the night is a constant annoyance for the homeowners on Harvest
Lane.
Chairman Donnelly called the Petitioner to the stand to address the issues.
Mr. Simonds stated the sidewalk would remain intact and that he will have a discussion with the store
manager in regards to keeping the landscaping clean and maintained. He also mentioned he will talk with
the engineer regarding the water detention issue.
Mr. Simonds stated he doesn't have control over the semi- trucks waiting in the parking lot. They use third
party drivers and have no control as to when a shipment is received.
There was general discussion regarding the overflow of storm water and the area located between the wall
structure and the neighboring residential area. Mr. Simonds indicated he would need to review the
specifics of the storm water system with their project engineer.
Commissioner Fitzgerald stated that the Petitioner should have the topics he was going to discuss with his
engineer before he goes to the Village Board Meeting.
Chairman Donnelly closed the public hearing portion of the meeting and brought it back to the board.
Comissioner Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Fitzgerald:
"To adopt Staffs findings in the staff report as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and
recommend approval of:
A. An amendment to Ord. #6025 which granted a Conditional Use to amend the Planned Unit
Development to allow the expansion of the garden center, warehouse, and outdoor yard; and
B. A Variation to reduce the required off - street parking to 293 parking spaces, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Menards
dated June 20, 2012, revised July 15, 2013.
2. Installation of a safety barrier surrounding the proposed detention basins as required by
code. The safety barrier shall match in style and color the fence materials proposed for
the west side of the Garden Center area.
3. Installation of landscape materials along the perimeter of each retention pond to
effectively screen the ponds all year long and native vegetation tolerable of wet
conditions within each pond to assist with water filtration.
4. Submittal of a detailed landscape plan that complies with Article XXII of the Zoning
Ordinance which provides landscaping in areas which will be modified as part of the
project and replaces any damaged or missing plantings along the east bufferyard area.
5. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings for review and approval by the Village.
The engineering drawings shall include all site work including utilities, storm water
detention, and associated improvements; and
6. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and
requirements, including, but not limited to, detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code
regulations, landscaping regulations, Sign Code regulations; and Building regulations.
7. Seasonal sales will not be conducted within the parking lot.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Fitzgerald, Beattie, Hinaber, Floros, Otteman, Donnelly
NAYS: None
The motion was approved 6 -0,
Commissioner Hinaber made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Fitzgerald to approve the following
variation requests:
A. A Variation to increase the illumination levels at the property lines from .5 foot - candles up to
.7 foot - candles at the north property line, up to 1.2 foot - candles at the west property line, and
up to 2.4 foot - candles at the south property line.
B. A Variation to increase the parking lot uniformity levels from 3:1 (ave. /min.) and 12:1
(max. /min,) to 9.7:1 (ave. /min.) and 37.7:1 (max. /min.).
C. A Variation request to increase the parking lot maximum average illumination level from 2.4
foot - candles to 2.9 foot - candles.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Fitzgerald, Beattie, Hinaber, Floros, Otteman, Donnelly
NAYS: NONE
The motion was approved 6 -0. This case is Village Board Final.
After hearing six (6) cases Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Otteman to
adjourn the meeting at 9:40 p.m. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was
adjourned.
len"ia 1oder, Community I %velopmCnt
°trative Assistant
Village of Mount Prospect t M`n'Mftx
Community Development Department
CASE SUMMARY — PZ -08 -13
LOCATION: 730 & 710 E. Rand Road
PETITIONER: Menard, Inc. — Michael Simonds
OWNERS: Menard, Inc.
PARCEL #: 03 -35- 300 - 031 -0000. 03 -35 -300- 033 -0000. 03 -3- 300 -034 -0000, 03 -35 -300 -036 -0000,
03-35-300-038-0000, 0-3-35-300-032-0000
LOT SIZE: 13.92acres (606.279 sq. ft)
ZONING: B3 Community Shopping District Planned Unit Development (PU)
LAND USE: Commercial Buildings
REQUESTS: Amend Ord. 4602; which granted a Conditional Use to amend the Planned Unit
Development to allow the expansion of the garden center. warehouse_ and outdoor yard
& Variations (Parking & Lighting Requirements)
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
JOSEPH P. DONNELLY_ CHAIRPERSON
FROM: CONSUELO ANDRADE_ SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: JULY 11. 2013
HEARING DATE: JULY" 25, 2013
SUBJECT: ' 1 GRANTED '
PLANNED AMEND THE UNIT DEVELOPMENT • EXPANSION
VARIATIONS (PARKING & LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS) 740 E. RAND
ROAD / MENARD_ INC. ..;
BACKGROUND
A public hearing has been scheduled for the July 25, 2013 Planning & Zoning C,onunission meeting to review the
application by Menard, Inc. (the "Petitioner") regarding the tenant space located at 730 & 740 E. Rand Road (the
"Subject PropertN"). The Petitioner is seeking to amend Ord. 96025. which granted a Conditional Use to amend
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow the expansion of the garden center, warehouse. and outdoor Hard.
and Variations to the parking and lighting requirements. The P &Z hearing was properly noticed in the Juh 10.
2013 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition_ the Petitioner has completed the required written
notice to property owners within 250 -feet and Staff posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property.
PROPERTY" DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located on the east side of Rand Road and includes the existing Menards and Lube Pros
commercial buildings with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned B -3 PUD and is bordered by the
I -1 district to the north, R -1 district to the east.. B -4 district to the south, and the R -A and B -3 districts to the west
across Rand Road.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
The Subject Property originally received PUD and Variation approvals in 1989 (Ord. No. 4142). Over the rears,
the PUD was amended several times. In 1993 the PUD was amended to allow the existing Menards retail store
(Ord. No. 4592). The PUD was further amended in 1998 during the construction of the Menards store to allow
the installation of a fourteen (1 4) foot fence -like stricture (Ord. No. 4957). The PUD was last amended in 2012
to allow Menards' expansion of the garden center, warehouse_ and outdoor Nard (Ord. No. 6025). Variations
approved as part of the 2012 amendment included parking and overall lot coverage. The parking Variation
allowed a reduction to the required off - street parking from 678 to 339 parking spaces.
Since the 2012 zoning approvals, the building formerlt occupied bv Aldi grocerN store was demolished, Aldi
relocated to Mount Prospect Plaza. Menards has submitted plans for the expansion, but has not obtained a
building permit. Revisions to the plans are required to address code requirements_ including storm water
PZ -08 -13
Planning & Zoning Commission Nleeting ,lull 25. 2013 Page 3
detention. In order to accommodate the required storm water detention_ the site plan was revised. The revised
site plan indicates 293 parking spaces would be provided_ N\ [itch requires a new Variation. The Petitioner also
seeks numerous Variations to the lighting requirements.
Per the revised site plan, two retention ponds would be provided along the north propert, line. The site plan
indicates a six (6) foot tall retaining wall for the westerl- pond and a five (5) foot tall retaining wall for the
easterly pond. The Petitioner did not submit detail draw ings for the ponds. The retaining ponds w ill be required
to provide ramps for maintenance and emergenc access. Additionall`_ a safety barrier will be required around
each pond for safety purposes due to the height of the retaining walls. A drop -off in excess of 30" requires the
installation of a safety barrier per code. As part of the permit approval process the Petitioner rN ill be required to
submit plans providing this barrier. The barrier should match in style the decorative fence located on the west
side of the Garden Center area. Additionally the retaining ponds, including walls_ will be subject to review and
approval by the Engineering Division. Where feasible. tiered retaining walls should be utilized to reduce the
overall height of the structure. The Petitioner will be required to submit detail plans and structural calculations
for Village Staff review.
The Petitioner also failed to submit calculations for the proposed storm water detention. Therefore_ the
Engineering Division was unable to determine if the proposed volume is going to be sufficient. The Engineering
Division pointed out that there are significant Village and N1WRD sanitar- sewers and interceptors in the area,
The MWRD has an easement over their facilities_ and it is not clear if the pond(s) extends into the easement. or if
the MWRD would approve such an encroachment. The Petitioner should be aware that there may be problems
with the implementation even if the NM`RD grant permissions. A sixty six (66) inch combined sewer overflow
cuts right across the pond(s) area. It may not be possible to excavate near the pipe. Also_ manholes would not be
permitted to be installed in the pond back or bottom to avoid maintenance and infiltration problems. While these
are issues to be addressed as part of the building perinit process, these comments are included as part of the Staff
Report in an effort to ensure the Petitioner is aware of the concerns and requirements. The Petitioner will be
required to submit any required calculation and drawings for the storm water detention and retaining walls as part
of the building permit re % process.
The site plan also indicates a proposed generator. The Petitioner will be required to screen the generator as
required per Section 14.30412c of the Village Code. Ground mounted mechanical and utilit, equipment that is
6' in height or less will be required to be screened from view utilizing landscaping. which will grow to the height
of the around based utility. Ground mounted mechanical and utility equipment that is taller than 6' in height will
be required to be screened from view with an enclosure that is consistent with the material of the principal
structure and appropriate landscape materials to screen the enclosure.
Landscaping
The site plan provides a conceptual landscape design. As shown, the proposed landscaping will not comply w ith
all the landscape requirements. Providing additional landscape plantings to screen the retention ponds will be
required around each pond. Such plantings shall include shade and ornamental trees. evergreens_ shrubs. and
other live plating materials. In addition, native vegetation, tolerable to wet conditions, within the ponds will be
required to assist in water filtration. Trees provided shall not consist of fruit or female ginkgo trees. and shall be
planted above the high water level line. The Petitioner will be required to submit a detailed landscape plan that
addresses the comments above and complies w ith the landscape requirements.
Parkin
Per the approved parking Variation, the Subject Property is required to provide 339 parking spaces. The revised
site plan replaced forte five (45) parking spaces with a detention pond at the north end of the parking lot. As a
result, the overall parking count was decreased from 339 to 293. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow
293 parking spaces.
Pz_09_ 13
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Jul-, 25. 2013 Page 4
Lot Coverage
As per the approved Variation from 2012, the overall lot coverage allowed is 99.77%. With the replacement of
some parking spaces « ith detention. the revised site plan indicates the overall lot coverage decreased to 87%).
Liglli�tiny
The Petitioner submitted a photometric plan that indicates the proposed exterior 11 for the Sub , ject Property.
The proposed screening wall/fence around the nev, outdoor storage H ard located north of the building Nvill include
light fixtures with fifteen (1- degree cutoff angles. This would be consistent with the light fixtures current[-,
located on the existing screening valli/fence located on the Subject Property. Per the Village Code, the Director
of Community Development may approve cutoff angles greater than ninety degrees (90'). As lono as the lights
are ANithin the outdoor storage areas and do not cause glare onto adjacent properties, the proposed fifteen (15)
degree cutoff angles �Nill be acceptable. All other light fixtures, including the parking lot light poles, vill be
required to include a ninety (90) degree cutoff angle.
Some of the illumination levels proposed would not comply with Village Code requirements. The illumination
levels as measured at the property lines would nicaStirc up to A foot-candles at the east lot line, .7 at the north
line, 1.2 at the west lot line, and 2 4 at the south lot line, The Village Code alloys up to 5 foot-candles at the lot
lines abutting a nonresidential property or right of vav, Therefore- the Petitioner is seeking a variation to increase
the Illumination levels along the north, NNest, and south property lines
The parking lot's illumination levels would consist of a minimum average of 3 foot-candles and a maximum
average of 2,9 foot - candles The Village Code requires a minimum average of 2 foot-candles and a i
average of 2.4 foot-candles for parking lots. The Petitioner is seeking a variation to increase the parking lot
C
maximum average from 2.4 to 2.9 foot-candles. The proposed uniformity levels would also require variation
approval. The photometric plan indicates the parking lot's uniformity levels would measure 9 7:1 (ave./min.) and
37.7: (ma-c./min.) when the Village Code allmNs a maximum of 3:1 (ave./min.) and 12:1 (max.1
The maximum average illumination level for the propert-, \Nould be 2.3 foot-candles, �Nhich �Nould not exceed the
maximum average illumination level of 5 foot-candles permitted.
The Petitioner submitted cut sheets for the exterior light fixtures As shoAyn on the fixture cut sheet, the CL/'CS
Lumark canopy light would not comp w ith the Village Code requirement because it would include a drop lens.
The Village Code requires all lighting mounted Luider a canopy , including, but not limited to, luminaries mounted
on or recessed into the loA-, surface of a canopy to be fu cutoff and include a flat lens. The Petitioner is not
seeking relief from the Village's hill cutoff flat lens requirement. Per the photometric plan, a flat lens would be
provided for the canopy light fixture. The Petitioner �� ill be required to provide the C73 flat prismatic tempered
glass lens" option.
The existing parking lot lights do not compl with Village Code. The existing parking lot light poles include a
drop lens when the Village Code requires a flat lens. Per the photometric plan. the parking lot ligh will be
replaced with new fixtures. which will consist of full cutoff and flat lens.
GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE
The folloiN imy table compares the required parking and lighting regulations to the Petitioner's proposal.
Requirement
Proposal
Parking Spaces
Parking
339
293
Lighting
M,
PZ -O8 -13
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting ,fuh 2. 2013
............... .. .........................
.. .................. _.... .... ............. ......
? f )ot- ccmc11ee horth lot 1077)
At Propert} Lines
Max_ .5 foot - candles
12 fihrrt- .cun(Hes (ive �( lot ling:)
2.4 fboi -Cunclles (solith loo line)
Parking Lot
Min, average .2 foot - candles
> foot- candles
Max average 2.4 foot - candles
2 1 ) ti>��t �,crrrcllc: �
Parking Lot
Max. 3:1 (avg./min.)
9 T: /
Uniformity Levels
Max. 12:1 (max./min.)
a?. /, :I ruin.)
Overall
Max. 5 foot - candles _
2.3 foot - candles
CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS
Page ;
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.2031.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include
seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary
of these findings:
• The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health. safety. morals. comfort or
general welfare:
• The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjotment. or value of other properties in the
vicinit} or impede the orderly development of those properties:
• There is adequate provision for utilities_ drainage. and design of access and egress to minimize congestion
on Village streets, and
• The request is in compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan,
Zonin Code.. and other Village Ordinances.
Staff finds the request to Amend Ord. 4602. ivhieln granted a Conditional Use to annend the Planned Unit
Development to allow the expansion of the garden center, warehouse, and outdoor yard satisfies the standards for
a Conditional Use. Besides the reduction in parking to accommodate the storm water detention, there have been
no changes to the project since the project received the zoning approvals in 2012. The expansion would be
compliance with the provisions of the Village's Comprehensive Plan, The Village's Comprehensive Plan calls
for the subject property to be utilized for Communit-, Commercial land uses which encourages "large -scale big
box and mixed use is pe developments." The proposed Menards retail building is compatible with this land use
designation. The expansion project vvas designed in a manner to contain its operations on the Subject Propert}
and not impede the orderly development of adjacent properties. Access to the storage area xN ill be limited to
traffic alread-\ on the propert\ and will not provide additional access points from Harvest Lane or Rand Road.
Parking lot cross connections are also provided to the parcels containing Lube Pros. Brunsv� ick, and the Frankie's
restaurant to provide for sufficient access and egress from the propert, .
VARIATION STANDARDS
The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven
specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a sunnma« of these
findungs:
A hardship due to the pin�sical surroundings, shape. or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person
presently having an interest in the property,
Lack of desire to increase finauncial gain: and
Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The project requires relief from the parking regulations. The Petitioner seeks a variation to allow 293 spaces. The
Petitioner justifies this variation request by indicating their stores do not operate similar to other major retailers.
PZ -O8- 13
Planning & Zoning Commission \leeting July 25. 2013 Page 6
The large N�arehouse type design limits their parking demand and peak seasons are limited to the spring and
summer months. The Petitioner also states that the proposed parking ratio is similar to other store locations they
operate and N\ould be sufficient for their needs. The Petitioner references a studN that analyzed the parking at
their Antioch and Long Grove stores. Each of these stores includes a 160.000 sq. ft. footprint phis 60,000 sq. ft.
of warehouse space similar to the Mount Prospect proposal. The studv indicated that the peak demand was 200
vehicles at any one time for their Long Grove store. Staff is supportive of the parking variation request as
Menards is a national retailer and understands how their stores operate based on demand at other locations.
Additionally- if Menards �Nere to vacate the store and another retailer occupied the building which did not require
the outdoor storage area. the site can be reconfigured to meet parking requirements.
The project also requires relief from the lighting regulations. Per the Petitioner. compk ing with the Village
Code's lighting regulations would create an unsafe environment for guests traversing the parking lot and for local
residences. The Petitioner further states the site is uniquely shaped_ which limits the placement of light poles.
The higher illumination levels are found in areas where pedestrians and vehicle traffic is the greatest in order to
avoid accidents and keep customers safe. While Village Staff appreciates the Petitioner's concerns for safety. the
Variation requests do not meet the standards for a Variation, There are no unique circumstances at the Subject
Property that would not be applicable to other commercial properties. The lighting information can be adjusted
to comply with Village Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed amendment to the PUD meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.9 of the
Zoning Ordinance and parking variation meets the standards established in Section 14.203.C,9, Based on these
findings Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the following motions:
-- To adopt Staffs findings in the staff report as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and
recommend approval of
A. An amendment to Ord. 46025 which granted a Conditional Use to amend the Planned Unit
Development to allow the expansion of the garden center_ warehouse_ and outdoor vard: and
B. A Variation to reduce the required off - street parking to 293 parking spaces, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared bN Menards dated
June 20. 2012- revised Jule 15. 201;.
2. Installation of a safety barrier surrounding the proposed detention basins as required b) code.
The safet, barrier shall match in sty le and color the fence materials proposed for the west side of
the Garden Center area.
3. Installation of landscape materials along the perimeter of each retention pond to effectively
screen the ponds all rear long and native vegetation tolerable of wet conditions within each pond
to assist with water filtration
4. Submittal of a detailed landscape plan that complies with Article XXII of the Zoning Ordinance.
�. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings for rev°ieN� and approval by the Village. The
engineering draiNings shall include all site work including utilities. stone water detention. and
associated improvements, and
6. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements,
including_ but not limited to. detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code regulations,
landscaping regulations_ Sign Code regulations: and Building regulations.'
The illumination variations do not meet the standards established in Section 14.203 C 9 and Staff recommends
that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend denial of the following motions:
PZ-09- 13
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 25. 2013
William J. Cooney, AICP
Director of Community Development
9M
I C PI I t I' PW I ,� 11 * , , 1 : :' 'I "o " , NINt I', MW4 VIT, Vmij ;",od m4PUC , b, ,
July 15, 2013
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
Attn: Consuelo Andrade
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 -3218
Re: Menard, Inc.
Petition to Amend Ordinance 6025
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Dear Consuelo:
Menard, Inc. is petitioning to amend Ordinance 6025, dated August 7, 2012 which was an
amendment to a prior Ordinance. The enclosed is being timely submitted to be placed on the
July 25, 2013 Planning and Zoning Agenda. As we have previously discussed, Menard, Inc.
intends to reconfigure the northern portion of the parking lot to accommodate additional storm
water storage as required pursuant to Village Code. The reconfiguration of the parking lot
decreases the overall parking count, requiring Menard, Inc. to petition for a parking variance.
Menard, Inc. is also seeking numerous variances from the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance and
Parking Lot Lighting Ordinance.
Menard, .Inc. is petitioning to Amend Ordinance 6025 to allow for the following:
• A reduction in the requirement of total on -site parking stalls. Ordinance 6025 requires
339 parking stalls on the Menard's and former Aldi parcels. The proposed Menard's
expansion provides 293 parking stalls.
• The nature of Menard's use justifies 293 parking spaces rather than a higher
number which will go unused. Menard, Inc. does not desire to pave several acres
of land for parking that will never be utilized, just as the Village does not want
several acres of unsightly, unused hard surface area paved for parking. Whereas,
other retailers meet the Ordinances and construct vast parking lots to meet the
Christmas rush, Christmas is not Menard, Inc.'s peak sales period. Menard, Inc.'s
"busy season" is actually two seasons, spring and summer, during which time we
have a steady stream of customers, and not a single spike as other retailers enjoy
at Christmas. As a retailer, Menard, Inc. is not about to under -park our use.
Menard's does not generate the same type of high traffic volumes that would be
expected from a general retailer (Wal -Mart or Target). The total floor area also
includes large display and warehousing areas as well as larger aisles for
maneuvering bulky items. These features contribute to a larger building square
footage and make building size a poor indicator of parking needs for this unique
facility. In addition, Menard's finds that typically 10 -15% of our customers are in
the rear yard area at any given time loading materials, and do not require the use
of storefront parking.
• During the time Aldi was present onsite the site provides 489 parking stalls, of
which 189 parking stalls are allocated to the Aldi store and 300 are allocated to
5101 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 -9625 PHONE (715) 876 -5911 FAX (715) 876 -2868
the Menards store. During the spring and summer months, the Menards store
provides a garden center in the parking lot that occupies approximately 13 parking
stalls, which brings the Menards store parking lot down to 287 parking stalls.
With the proposed plans of demolishing the Aldi store and moving the garden
center into the building and enclosed yard, the proposed 318 parking stalls will be
adequate to serve the Menards store. The proposed plans provide an additional 31
parking stalls in comparison to what is provided today during the busy spring and
summer season at the Menards store. This is an increase of 10.8 %.
o Previously Village Staff had requested additional information regarding peak
parking demand. Menard, Inc. provided two parking analyses we had performed
in March of 2010 at the Antioch, Illinois and Long Grove, Illinois Menards stores.
The Antioch and Long Grove stores are our newest prototype similar in size and
merchandising selection to what is proposed in the Village. The parking numbers
were adjusted accordingly to represent the peak weekend related to sales. Below
is a chart summarizing the peak parking demand at each store:
The Mt. Prospect store outperforms the Antioch store, but underperforms the
Long Grove store. With the data provided, we can presume required parking
demand for the Mt. Prospect store will fall between the Antioch and Long Grove
store peak parking demand. During a peak weekend at the Long Grove store no
more than 200 parking stalls are required to meet demand. The Long Grove store
provides 459 parking stalls (43.57% occupied) and the Antioch store provides 458
parking stalls (38.87% occupied).
The proposed Menards expansion in Mt. Prospect provides 293 parking stalls and
the parking demand on a peak weekend should not exceed 200 parking stalls
(62.89% occupied) that are required at the Long Grove store for a peak weekend.
Village Staff also requested information regarding the number of guests that
access the enclosed yard area per day. I have attached a summary of the guests
per hour that access the yard by vehicle for the week of 6/3/2012 — 6/9/2012.
• Variances from the following outdoor lighting regulations pursuant to §14.314 and
§ 14.2219 of the Village Ordinance:
o Fixture Design:
• All lighting fixtures with the exception of the fixtures labeled C and D on
the Photometric plan on the eastem fence /wall structure provide a cutoff
angle of not more than ninety degrees (90 °).
• The fixtures labeled C and D on the Photometric plan on the eastern
fence /wall structure have a cutoff angle of fifteen degrees (15'). The
Director of Community Development may approve cutoff angles greater
than ninety degrees (90 upon submission of information conclusively
demonstrating that the proposed lighting will not cause glare on adjacent
properties. These lights are located around the lumber yard that is
enclosed with the 14' fence /wall structure. These lights are angled
towards the Menards building and do not cause any glare onto adjacent
properties, as shown on the Photometric Plan. These lights are angled to
reduce the number of lights required to illuminate the lumber yard and to
provide a better balance of light distribution. Due to the unique shape and
size of this parcel limit the placement of light fixtures the Director should
approve the proposed cutoff angle. The lights labeled D on the
Photometric plan exist onsite today and to our knowledge no one has
complained about the angle of the light fixture.
■ If the Director declines this request, Menard, Inc. will seek a variance for
this request.
o Site Lighting
■ Parking Lot:
• The Northern property line along Harvest Lane has an intensity
level of 0.7 foot - candles. This intensity level is located at the
Menards entrance drive.
• The Western property line along Rand Road has an intensity level
of 1.2 foot - candles. This intensity level is located along the Rand
Road right of way.
• The Southern property line has an intensity level of 2.4 foot -
candles. This intensity level is located at the Menards entrance
from the adjoining development to the south.
• The light intensity at the property line abutting the nonresidential
property and right of way exceeds 0.5 foot - candles, as shown on
the Photometric Plan and mentioned above. Menard, Inc. is
seeking a variance from this ordinance because in order to comply
the parking lot and associated drive aisles would have to be
unusually dark, creating an unsafe environment for the guests
shopping the store, traversing the parking lot and for local
residences. This site is uniquely shaped and limits the placement
of light poles throughout the site. The granting of these variances
will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property or improvements in the neighborhood. The granting of
these variances will not impair an adequate supply of light and air
to adjacent properties or increase the congestion of the public
streets or diminish property values within the neighborhood. The
Menards redevelopment should increase the value of properties in
the area.
■ Illumination Levels and Uniformity (Parking Lot):
• The proposed Max/Min uniformity ratio is 37.7:1. Code requires a
12:1 ratio.
• The proposed Avg. /Min ratio is 9.7:1. Code requires a 3:1 ratio.
• The proposed maximum illumination level is 11.1 foot - candles.
Code requires a 2.4 foot -candle maximum illumination level.
• Menard, Inc. is seeking a variance from these sections of the
Ordinance because we feel it creates an unusually dark and unsafe
environmental for the guests shopping the store and local
residences. The area with the "max" is located near the main drive
aisle in front of the store where pedestrians and vehicle traffic is
the greatest. Lighting is essential here to avoid any accidents and
to keep Menards guests, employees and local residents safe. The
granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the area.
The granting of this variance will not impair visibility to the
adjacent property or increase the danger of traffic problems or
endanger the public safety. If these variances are not granted
Menard, Inc. will suffer from a hardship in that our guests,
employees and local residence will have difficulties seeing and
will create an unsafe environment.
If there is any additional information that I can provide, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
Menard„fnC.
v
Mike s o
Real Est tc � ative
Menard, Inc.
5101 Menard Drive
Eau Claire, WI 54703
Phone: 715- 876 -2984
Fax: 715- 876 -5998
Email: msimonds(cr�,menard- inc.com
Label : A , 3 = E
DESCRIPTION
QE COOPER LIGHTING - LUMAIWOO
The Lumark Tribute is the most versatile, functionally designed, universally
adaptable outdoor luminaire available. The Tribute brings outstanding
performance to walkways, parking lots, roadways, loading docks, building
areas, and any security lighting application. U.L. listed and CSA certified for
wet locations.
SPECIFICATION FEATURES
Construction
Rugged one -piece die -cast
aluminum housing and door
frame. One -piece silicone gasket
protects the optical chamber from
performance degrading contami-
nants. One (1) stainless spring
latch and two (2) stainless hinges
allow toolless opening and
removal of door frame.
Reflector
Choice of nine (9) high efficiency
optical distributions, including five
(5) segmented optical systems
constructed of premium 95%
reflective odized aluminum sheet.
Optical segments are rigidly
mounted inside a thick gauge
aluminum housing for superior
protection. All segment faces are
clean of rivet heads, tabs or other
means of attachment which may
cause streaking in the light
distribution. Optical modules are
field rotatable in 90 increments
and offered standard with mogul
base lampholders for High
Pressure Sodium and 200 -40OW
Meta[ Halide assemblies or
medium -base lampholders for
Metal Halide 15OW and below.
Electrical
Ballast and related electrical
componentry are hard mounted to
die -cast housing for optimal heat
transfer and operating efficiency.
Optional swing -down galvanized
steel power tray with integral
handle and quick disconnects
allows tray to be completely
removed from housing providing
ample room for fixture installation
and maintenance.
Mounting
Extruded B" aluminum arm
features internal bolt guides for
easy positioning of fixture during
installation to pole or wall surface.
Standard single carton packaging
of housing, square pole arm and
round pole adapter allow for
consolidated product arrival to site.
Optional internal mast arm mount
accepts a 1 1/4" to 2 3/8" O.D.
horizontal tenon, while a 4 -bolt
clamping mechanism secures
fixture. Cast -in leveling guides
provide + / -5° vertical leveling
adjustment.
Finish
Housing and arm finished in a 5
stage premium TGIC bronze
polyester powder coat paint.
Optional colors include black, grey,
white, dark platinum and graphite
metallic. RAL and custom color
matches available.
TR
TRIBUTE
70 - 40OW
High Pressure Sodium
Pulse Start Metal Halide
Metal Halide
AREA LUMINAIRE
AP K
p
E ■ w
DIMENSIONS
DRILLING PATTERNS
TYPE "M"
� 116
6 1/2"
i
12°
[305Pn
0"mm1
— 151/2" [394mml
314" [20mml
; [124mml
DRILLING PATTERNS
TYPE "M"
i y
... .. ... - ... ®.22 L559mm1 -1µ p, "G7 "I';Ipi4uv7111
WALL MOUNT(MAl219 - XX) TRUNNION MOUNT
tla eL^^r
� 116
i V
"�"�
12°
[305Pn
0
314" [20mml
; [124mml
dia. hole
.,✓�
27116 "[124mm1
6 �
. J
4716" [
g24mml
w.. Iv18 "[14mmI
6 £1u1 ir'ruvi8x
J
Domml
kR i
dia, holes
i y
... .. ... - ... ®.22 L559mm1 -1µ p, "G7 "I';Ipi4uv7111
WALL MOUNT(MAl219 - XX) TRUNNION MOUNT
tla eL^^r
i V
"�"�
12°
[305Pn
0
; [124mml
r, „',.......A
10 1 /2”
[267mml
. J
61/2"
w.. Iv18 "[14mmI
6 £1u1 ir'ruvi8x
J
Dla, Hole (4)
kR i
i
7/16" (12mm) 13132"
x3 /4 "[20mml [11mml
slot (2) slot
Walml
.. 3" [77mml ...
TECHNICAL DATA
UL Wet Locations Listed
C ;A cerlilied
EISACompliant
ENERGY DATA
HI•Roactanco Baltnu Input Watts
70W HPS HPF (95 Watts)
10OW HPS HPF (130 Watts)
15OW HPS HPF (190 Watts)
15OW MP HPF 085 Watts)
CWI Ballast Input watts
250W HPS HPF (300 Watts)
CWA Ballast Input Watts
175W MH HPF (210 Watts)
20OW MP HPF (227 Watts) d
20OW HPS HPF (250 Watts)
25OW MH HPF (295 Watts)
250W MP HPF (283 Watts) @
320W MP HPF (365 Watts)
35OW MP HPF (397 Watts) D
7
1'" 40OW MP HPF (452 Watts)
Garay t 6 40OW MH HPF (455 Watts)
40OW HPS HPF (465 Watts)
Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice.
www.coeperli ghting.cam Consult your repreaentative for sddltlonel options and nnlsh -,
EPA
Effective Projected Area: (Sq. Ft.)
Without Arm: 1.19
SHIPPING DATA
Approximate Net Weight;
39 Ibs„ (17.73 kgs.)
4 T eM
1F.Yrl
ADH092320
02/28120114:06;20 PM
Cam, bed �
T COOPER LIGHTING -
DESCRIPTION
The Lumark Canopy Light combines lasting durability and excellent
photometrics. CSA certified for wet Iocations.The Canopy Light mounts
quickly to a variety of surfaces, making it ideal for covered walkways,
convenience store /service station canopies and enclosed parking areas.
SPECIFICATION FEATURES
Construction
HOUSING: CL housing is
constructed of heavy -gauge
aluminum. CS housing is
constructed of durable steel
welded construction. GASKET:
Fully gasketed door Frame seals out
contaminants. DOOR: Hinged door
provides easy access for
maintenance and relamp[ng and
door can be removed to simplify
installation.
Electrical
BALLAST: High power factor ballast
with class H insulation. CL
construction is listed for 40 °C
ambient environments. CS
construction is listed for 25 °C
ambient environments.
Optics
Optical system features an
injection - molded prismatic lens
with internal prisms and white
highly reflective internal surface,
Finish
Weather- and abrasion- resistant
white polyester powder coat finish,.
CUCS
CANOPY LIGHT
100 - 40OW
High Pressure Sodium
Pulse Start Metal Halide
Metal Halide
CANOPY LUMINAIRE
TECHNICAL DATA
UL Wet Location Listed
CSA Certified
EISA Compliant a
ENERGY DATA
Rsector Ballast Input Watts
10OW HPS HPF (118 Watts)
10OW MP HPF (120 Watts)
15OW HPS HPF (175 Watts)
DIMENSIONS
I
10"
[254mmi
20 15116'[532mm1
Square
LAMP TYPE ...��.,. WATTAGE
Pulse Start Metal Halide (MP) 100, 150, 200, 250, 320, 360, 40OW
Metal Halide (MH) 175, 250, 40OW
High Pressure Sodium (HPI 100 150, ,. 40O .�.e.w
260, 400W
Lighting
www. cooperli gh ting _com
High Reactor Ballast Input Watts
15OW MP HPF (185 Watts)
CWI Ballast Input Watts
175W MH HPF 1223 Watts)
25OW HPS HPF (300 Watts)
25OW MH HPF (300 Watts)
40OW HPS HPF (465 Watts)
40OW MH HPF (475 Watts)
CWA Ballast Input Watts
175W MH HPF (210 Watts)
20OW HPS HPF (250 Watts)
20OW MP HPF (227 Watts)
25OW MP HPF (263 Watts) 0)
32OW MP HPF (365 Watts) r0
40OW HPS HPF (465 Watts)
400W MH HPF (455 Watts)
40OW MP HPF (452 Watt)
SHIPPING DATA
Approximate Net Weight:
44 lbs. (20 kgs.)
A
rh,r�i
�Q
l�
Uk—
ADHO82287 pc
2012 -01 -12 12:2838
PHILIPS X6¢1
Day -Brits
IES ROAD REPORT
PHOTOMETRIC FILENAME: S13X40M3G.IES
DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION (From Photometric File)
I ESNA:LM -63 -1995
[TEST] SBX40M3G
[DATE] 06/02/98
[MANUFAC] PHILIPS DAY -BRITE
[LUMCAT] SBX400M- MC3 -MCLGS
[LUMINAIRE] NITE BRITES SBX AREA /SITE LIGHT
[MORE] TYPE III MEDIUM CUTOFF
[MORE] W /GLARESHIELD
[BALLAST] ADVANCE 71A6091
[LAMP] 40OWMH
CHARACTERISTICS
IES Classification
Type II
Longitudinal Classification
Short
Cutoff Classification (deprecated)
Cutoff'
Lumens Per Lamp
36000 (1 lamp)
Total Lamp Lumens
36000
Luminaire Lumens
20723
Total Luminaire Efficiency
58%
Downward Total Efficiency
58%
Luminaire Efficacy Rating (LER)
52
Maximum Candela
14519
Maximum Candela Angle
65H 65V
Maximum Candela ( <90 Degrees Vertical)
14519
Maximum Candela Angle ( <90 Degrees Vertical)
65H 65V
Maximum Candela At 90 Degrees Vertical
32 (0.1% Lamp Lumens)
Maximum Candela from 80 to <90 Degrees Vertical
713 (2.0% Lamp Lumens)
Total Luminaire Watts
397
Ballast Factor
1.00
Calculations based on
published IES Edition -
Methods and re recommendations, ons, g values rounded Page 1
nded for display purposes. W
Results derived from content of manufacturers photometric file.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT iiG�t I >r
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT — Punning Division
50 S. Emerson Street ,
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Zoning Request Application
Z Case Number
P &Z -0%
F .
^>,
Development Name/Address
10
Street
Date of Submission
Address
Fax u
A
Hearing Date
715 -876 -5998
Zonin r Request(s):
Conditional Use for
?
❑ Zoning Map Amendment: From to
State
Variation from
Email
Sec. ❑ Text Amendment: Section(s)
Eau Claire
(Office Only) Other: Amendment to an approved PUD
W
• P & Z Final
• Village Board Final «
'�
Interest in Property
W a
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
U
Summary of Requested Action(s): Please See Attached
z
z
N
uw...
u Name �
Telephone ,(day)�. "�
Mik S imonds - Real Estate Representative
(715) 876 -2984
z
Corporation
Telephone (evening)
F O
Menard, Inc.
10
Street
Address
Fax u
5101 Menard Dr.
715 -876 -5998
?
City
State
Zip Code
Email
Eau Claire
WI
54703
msimonds(a)menard- inc.com
Interest in Property
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
www.mountprospect.org l TDD 847,392.6064
Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Standards for the Zoning
Hours of Operation
Mon -Sat: 6:30 AM -10:00 PM Sun: 8:00 AM -8:00 PM
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
www.mountprospect.org 2 TDD 847.392.6064
LP roperty awne_ .w.._._.__.® �. ..
P r sa me as appticant
z
Name
Telephone (day)
Corporation
Telephone (evening)
E C
Street Address
Fax
a�
a
City State Zip Code Email
Addresses) (Street Number, Street)�
740 E. Rand Road Mt. Prospect, IL
Lot Area (Sq.Ft) Zoning District
Total Building Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed
593,919 B -3 PUD
Use
Setbacks:
Front
Rear Side
I Side
O
10'
10'
Building Height ; Lot Coverage /o �
i Standard Parking in Spaces
g g g( ° ) g P
� i
� Accessible Parking Spaces
30 1 1/2
IS
Adjacent Land Uses:
W
North South East
West
�
I 1 an B B4 PUD
d 3 , R1
�
cn
V rgp_erty Index Nunn rocr(s). _
m
Please Sec Attached .
_
H
(attach addiitional sheets of necessary)
Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary)
W
Please See Attached
�...... _ ..d� ,., . , _ . _,..
_ ... ..... -.
-.. , . - ...... ._.__. .,. _.... w ..... -
Proposed Land Use (as listed in the zoning code's land use table)
Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Standards for the Zoning
Hours of Operation
Mon -Sat: 6:30 AM -10:00 PM Sun: 8:00 AM -8:00 PM
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
www.mountprospect.org 2 TDD 847.392.6064
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
www.mountprospect.org 3 TDD 847.392.6064
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
i
740 E. Rand Road Mt. Prospect IL
W
Q
Lot Area (Sq.ft) Zoning District
Total Building Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed }'
A h
593,919 B -3 PUD
Use
C
Setbacks:
O
Front
_
Rear
Side
Side
20
10'
10'
Building Height
Lot Coverage ( %)
Standard Parking Spaces
Accessible Parking Spaces
30' 1 1/2"
88.06%
318
8
Developer
Name Menard, Inc,
Telephone (day)
715 -876 -2984
Address 5101 Menard Dr.
Fax
715 -876 -5998
Eau Claire, WI 54703
Email
msimonds @ menard- ine.com
Attorney
Name
Telephone (day)
Address ... ..
Fax
Email
.pw.
Surveyor
Z
Name
Telephone (day)
4
Address
Fax
�......, a �. .. _.....
Email
_.. �.. .._ .. .._ . _., , ..�w...... .......
q a
Engineer Knoche Engineerin
Name
Telephone (day)
630 - 845 -1270
CL
24 N Bennett
s
Address . ...
�...., �.....
Fax
630- 845 -1275
p
Geneva, IL 60134
_ n..... a _.
.._....,M _.........
Email
�
Architect
Name
Telephone (day)
Address ��m.�... -.... - .. ...e -----
_ ._ .. _�.._.. , , .
Fax
Email
Landscape Architect
L
Name
Telephone (day)
Address ...- �_.___....�._. —w_... - .__._,....___.
_F.,.
Fax
.....
Email
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
www.mountprospect.org 3 TDD 847.392.6064
Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other
materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Community Development Department's Planning Division. Incomplete submittals
will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that
materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal.
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be
given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the
owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during
reasonable hours for wit 1 inspection of tht min'Ct pt WI)l,
I hereby affirm sha info n darn Itrovi I ffe� na '0 all materials submitted in association with this application are true and
accurate to the b. yap" glP atvlgc.
Applicant Date
(�[gt'1atllrC)
Print Name Mike Simonds Real Estate ipresentalive- Menard, Inc.
If applicant is not property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application and
the associated supporting material.
Property Owner
(signature)
Print Name
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development
50 South Emerson Street, Mount .Prospect Illinois
www.mountprospect.org
4
Phone 847.818.5328
Fax 847.818.5329
TDD 847.392.6064
Affidavit of Ownership
COUNTY OF-eOOK
W k 5 coo's I C�
STATE OF�&
1, ?a-Q\ MkA C(r- S C. C-cW Pakkf (ILWAI under oath, state that I am
the sole
an Sgf! owner of the property
an authorized e
commonly described as 7 ` �''`�° YJ
and that such property is owned by
as of this date.
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before
me this I Z day of
20
L
Notary Public
my " Pv
DI?
111014
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847,818.5328
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847,818.5329
www.mountprospect.org 11 TDD 847.392.6064
' A v
. ... .... ... -
........ ....
rt
8
n.
11
JA
"y
ta
...........
�U Ul 831WC) — SISS NN la—
FA
o
8
n.
11
JA
"y
ta
...........
�U Ul 831WC) — SISS NN la—
FA
vY .
d I
�n o
� ?In
kx
r d
of �4.�rii
r
b �
J k
{{ I tl
* xk 4 Aw
UT
pQ
,s
.4
k
�
A
��.
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4142, AS AMENDED
BY ORDINANCE NOS. 4592, 4957 AND 6025 RELATIVE TO A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) AND VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATEI A Q A f_ 7 _ ASS AND ROAD
WHEREAS, Menards, Inc — Michael Simonds ( "Petitioner ") has filed a petition to amend the Planned Unit
Development (PUD) being the subject of Ordinance No. 4142, approved February 6, 1990, as amended by
Ordinance No. 4592, approved October 5, 1993, by Ordinance No. 4957, approved August 18, 1998 and by
Ordinance No. 6025 approved August 7, 2012 for a Conditional Use permit and Variations with respect to
property at 730 and 740 East Rand Road, ( "Property"), and legally described as follows:
PIN(s) Menards: 03 -35- 300 - 031 -0000
03 -35 -300- 032 -0000
03 -35- 300 - 033 -0000
03 -35- 300 - 034 -0000
03 -35- 300 - 036 -0000
03 -35- 300 - 038 -0000
Lot A in Reese's Addition to Mount Prospect, a Subdivision of part of the North West' /4 of the
South East' /4 of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in
Cook County, Illinois, excepting there from the following described parcels:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot A; thence on a assumed bearing of North 89
degrees 52 minutes 36 seconds West, along the North of Lot A, 28.90 feet to the point of
beginning; thence continuing North 89 degrees 52 minutes 36 seconds West on the Northerly
Line of Lot A, 323.48 feet; thence South 29 degrees 49 minutes, 11 seconds East, 237.42 feet;
thence North 60 degrees 10 minutes, 49 seconds, 2'80.53 feet., thence North 29 degrees 59
minutes, 21 seconds West, parallel with the East line of said Lot A, 75.96 feet to the point of
beginning;
and
Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot A; thence West on the South line of Lot A, a distance
of 594.07 feet to the point of beginning; thence Northerly, perpendicular to said South line of said
Lot A, a distance of 120 feet; thence Southwesternly on a line perpendicular to the Westerly line of
Lot A, a distance of 221.81 feet to said Westerly line, thence Southeasterly on said Westerly line
10 feet of the Southwest corner of Lot A, thence East on the South line of Lot A, a distance of
186.81 feet to the point of beginning;
and
Beginning at the intersection of the Easterly right -of -way line of Rand Road and the West line of
the Northwest' /4 of the Southwest /4 of Section 35; thence North along the West line of said
Northwest Y4 of the Southwest 1 /, of Section 35, a distance of 253 37
feet to a point, said point also being the Northwest corner of Lot 1, in Kamysz Subdivision, thence
East along a line parallel with the North line of said Southwest %4 a distance of 20.00 feet to a
point; thence South and parallel with the West line of said Northwest' /4 of the Southwest %4 a
distance of 241,71 feet to a point, hhonuo Southwest along a line a distance of 23.05 feet tothe
point of beginning, in Cook County, Illinois
P|N(s):O3'35'3OO'O32-UUOO
That part of Lot inReeses'Addition to Mount Prospect, o subdivision of part of the Northwest
quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 35. Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third
principal Merid0n, in Cook County, Illinois, described as follows: commencing at the Northeast
corner of said Lot A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 52 minutes 36 seconds
West, ����the No� ��
h|ineofLu�,26,90hmethoLhepointofbeginning
` G2 minutes 38 seconds 32�48hae��thonueGouth
89 degrees mnu o se�on . � .
29 degrees 4Q minutes 1i seconds East, 237'42feet; thence North G0 degrees 1U minutes 4g
seconds East 280.53 feet; thence North 29 degrees 5g minutes 21 seconds West, parallel with
the East line of said Lot A75.QG feet to the point nfbeginning.
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks (1) o Conditional Use to amend the Planned Unit Development (9UO)
Ordinance ' 142 to sHhmw the expansion of the Memamds garden center, warehouse and outdoor yard; (2) a
Variation to reduce the required off-street parking to 293 parking spaces, ( a Variation to increase the
illumination levels ad the property lines from, 5foot-oaodiesupto7 foot-candles a the north property line, wp
to 1 2 fmcd camd�es at the west property line and up to 2.4-candles at the south property; �) � weri��m to
inc parking lot uniformity levels from 3:1 (ave./min) and 12121 (max./min) to 9.71 (ave./min.) (ave./min.) and
37(mox/min�>�end5)ovahationnaquonttoinon
�'�' the parking lot maximum average illumination level
d 74O E
hom2.4hon�oond|esto2.O foot candles for the prope� k� � oa tadsd78O on E. Rand Rood . and
WHEREAS, Public Hearing was held on the request to amend the Conditional Use permit with Variations
being subject ' c���8-13behonetheP|onningandZoningCummiosioncfMheVi||mgeo
om the 25 pursuant to proper legal notice having been published inthe day
MfA,qaa pe(onthe 10m
day of July, 2O13;and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the
President and BoardofTruehoesinsupportofthenequeotboingtheoutoeotofPZ-O8'13; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration tothorequ-`stondhavodeherminedthatthaaamemeetytheotandmrdaofdhwViUagmandthotthegnontingof
the proposed amendment to the Conditional Use permit and Variations would be in the bent interest of the
Village.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VIL OF MOUN ' PROSPECT' COOK COUNTY. ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR
HOME RULE POVVER&
SECTION ONE� The recitals set forth are incorporated an findings of fact by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 4142 granting' a Planned Unit Development pennil,
s
passed and approved on February 6, 1990. a amended by Ordinance No. 4592, passed and approved
October 5 1QO3 me amended by Ordinance No,, 4957, passed and approved August 1�, 1998 and as
amended by n ann�
d d ' Ondi No 8O25infu� Conditional amend Planned
�
Ord in, 4142bo || the i mfth���enardm��r��m��nVmr
Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance allow � expansion , warehouse
and outdoor yard; (2) a variation to reduce the required off-street parking to 293 parking space$� (3) a
Variation to increase the illumination levels at the property V|mes from 5fmmt-cand|es up to 7 foot-candles a
the north property line, up to 1,2 foot candles at the west property tine and up to 2.4-candles at the South
property; 4) a variation to increase the parking lot uniformity levels from 3:1 (ave. /min) and 12:1 (max. /min) to
9.7:1 (ave. /min.) and 37.7.1 (max. /min.); and 5) a variation request to increase the parking lot maximum
average illumination level from 2.4 foot - candles to 2.9 foot candles as shown in the Photometric Plan for
exterior lighting; attached as Exhibit 1 for the property located at 730 and 740 E. Rand Road.
SECTION THREE: Approval of the Variation to reduce the required off - street parking is subject to complying
with the following conditions:
1, Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Menards
dated June 20, 2012, revised July 15, 2013e attached as Exhibit 2,
2. Installation of a safety barrier surrounding the proposed detention basins as required by
code. The safety barrier shall match in style and color the fence materials proposed for
the west side of the Garden Center area.
3. Installation of landscape materials along the perimeter of each retention pond to
effectively screen the ponds all year long and native vegetation tolerable of wet conditions
within each pond to assist with water filtration.
4. Submittal of a detailed landscape plan that complies with Article X:II of the ,honing
Ordinance which provides landscaping in areas which will be modified as part of the
project and replaces any damaged or missing, plantings along the east buffer yard area.
5. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings for review and approval by the Village. The
engineering drawings shall include all site work including utilities storm water detention,
and associated improvements; and
6. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and
requirements, including, but not limited to, detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code
regulations, landscaping regulations, Sign Code regulations; and Building regulations.
7. Seasonal sales will not be conducted within the parking lot,
SECTION FOUR The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this
Ordinance and Exhibits 1 and 2 with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County,
SECTION FIVE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of August, 2013.
Arlene A. Juracek
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H: \CLKO\W WORDINANCE21Amend Con UsePU Dmenard4592&49576025aug2013.doc
IIA
n
R
A4, ,
... .......
a M, a lim IN
a"W"m "Max 4713 a
- xx
ji N
I—E
... . .. ...
44
Iry
1E
amillm
I
}\ � ���
w \}
� � \ � � � � �
I
HAI HQ &3,LNVl" SN9N ISM3=
. .. ....... . .. ................ . . ........ ... ..
z
Lli
I--
/ N }
§
\ � � ~ \.
�t�
§ \
2 � \
\ }!�
�4� \( /.�
` � � / !
/. « }j
111
.
; 9
pr
\
9 lig1h A
§G \ �� /§
2, y/
§� §�
I
HAI HQ &3,LNVl" SN9N ISM3=
. .. ....... . .. ................ . . ........ ... ..
z
Lli
I--