The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOW Agenda Packet 01/13/2004 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA Meeting Location: Mt. Prospect Community Center 1000 West Central Road Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald L. Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Irvana Wilks Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Michael ladel II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2003 CITIZENS TO BE HEARD III. IV. 2004 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DISCUSSION TOPICS Over the past several years, the Village Manager's Office has attempted to better manage the flow of information, which comes to the Village Board through the Committee of the Whole Agendas. As you know, Committee of the Whole meetings are designed specifically to allow for more extensive discussion of pending policy, finances, Code changes and various items of community interest. The Committee of the Whole also serves as a forum for discussion of items, which are unexpected, controversial, or of an emergency nature. The evening's discussion will consist of reviewing suggested topics, discussing briefly the rationale and need for discussion and the potential timing for bringing such items forward. Board members, as well as staff, were asked to provide any suggested topics that they would like to have considered. These items are included in the accompanying package. In the past, the Village Board has engaged in a polling process, which identifies subjects that have the support of the Board for research and review. Appropriate staff will be available to answer questions and facilitate discussion. NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO A TTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODA TION TO PARTICIPA TE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE A T 100 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064. V. DISCUSSION OF MAYOR PRO TEM PROTOCOL On August 19, 2003, the Mayor and Board of Trustees passed Ordinance 5364 amending the Village Code with regard to the appointment of a "Mayor Pro Tem." As of this date, a Mayor Pro Tem has not been designated using the new protocol. There has been a desire expressed by Board members to further discuss potential refinements to the new protocol. Included here is the Committee of the Whole Agenda verbiage from the original presentation of the topic on July 8,2003: "The Village Code currently provides for the selection of a Mayor Pro Tem to serve in the official capacity of the Mayor in times of his/her absence or disability. The current protocol requires official action by the Village Board at one of its regular business meetings. Historically, the Mayor Pro Tem position has been established in the narrow circumstance of presiding over official meetings of the Village Board. Once the meeting has concluded, the status of Mayor Pro Tem is extinguished. In this day and age of extended travel capabilities, homeland securing issues and the potential suddenness with which the need for a Mayor Pro Tem may arise, staff would propose that the Village Board review the current protocol and consider an expanded and more definitive protocol to cover not only official Village meetings but also those periods where the current Mayor may be out of town and unavailable for extended periods of time. Attached is a recent survey of Northwest Municipal Conference communities and how they handle Mayor Pro Tem protocol. It appears that the protocol is somewhat unique to the culture of each community's philosophical viewpoint. In some cases, the Mayor has the ability to appoint a stand-in. In other cases, the Village Board must act on a case-by-case basis (as does Mount Prospect). In the case of Hoffman Estates, a semi-permanent Mayor Pro Tem is established from among Village Board members and serves a set term. The purpose of Tuesday evening's discussion is to engage in an initial philosophical discussion that will, hopefully, provide some direction to staff as how to proceed or not to proceed, as the case may be with drafting a new protocol. Appropriate staff will be on hand to answer questions and facilitate discussion." VI. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT VII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DECEMBER 9, 2003 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m., in the Mt. Prospect Park District Community Center, 1000 West Central Road, by Mayor Gerald Farley. Present at the meeting were: Trustees Timothy Corcoran, Paul Hoefert, Michaele Skowron, Irvana Wilks and Michael Zadel. Absent from the meeting was Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer. Staff members present included: Village Manager Michael Janonis, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl, Village Attorney Everette Hill, Community Development Director William Cooney, Deputy Community Development Director Michael Jacobs, Public Works Director Glen Andler, and Solid Waste Coordinator Lisa Angell. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of Minutes from November 25, 2003. Motion made by Trustee Hoefert and Seconded by Trustee Skowron. Minutes were approved. III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. IV. PRIMECO INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE FEE (lMF) LITIGATION Village Manager Michael Janonis stated that in 1997, the State adopted legislation to address Franchise Fee agreements among towns and phone service providers. The IMF is a rental fee for the use of public right-of-way. The law was challenged by the wireless providers and was overturned by the Illinois Supreme Court. Landline providers are also preparing to challenge the legislation at this time. The Village has an opportunity to participate in a consolidated defense of a Class Action Suit with members from the Northwest Municipal Conference. The proposal for the cost of the defense for the Village would be approximately $14,000. Village Attorney Hill stated that the Village would not prevail with the wireless providers since the case is quite specific and on point but there is a need to deal with the landline carriers. He stated the legislation is related to the municipalities obtaining a fee for the use of the right-of-way of these providers. He stated the majority of the revenue to the Village is from the land line companies. He stated the Village would have to defend itself to protect the revenue that it has already collected so it would make sense to participate in the Class Action Suit with other municipalities. He stated the costs are assigned on a per capita basis and this amount is only the initial contribution. He stated the Village is not bound to pay additional fees throughout the case unless so desired. He stated the Village would have the opportunity to reconsider participation when future fee requests are made. Village Manager stated the revenues previously collected have been in escrow since the challenge was made by the wireless providers. Consensus of the Village Board was to approve participation in the legal defense fund with the Northwest Municipal Conference. 1 V. ABANDONED SHOPPING CART AMENDMENT Village Manager Janonis stated the Village has incurred approximately $80,000 in expenses picking up shopping carts over the years and has undertaken several different approaches to address the problem. He stated there still does not appear to be any end in sight regarding the need to change behavior in order to avoid this expense. He feels that nothing short of drastic action would address the problem and there is a need for a harsher response. He stated there is also an unusual situation by an out of town business that borders Mount Prospect and the need to try and get enforcement with such an out of town business. He stated the legal research has yielded an opportunity to withhold the Business License from the corporate entity in an effort to force compliance of the business on the Village border. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: It was suggested that abandoned shopping carts should be treated the same as abandoned cars and there is a need to get more serious with the enforcement. General consensus of the Village Board was to consider an Ordinance requiring compliance with stiffer penalties as proposed by staff at a future Village Board meeting. VI. STAR LINE CONSULTING CONTRACT Village Manager Janonis stated that discussions have been underway for several years to expand the train line from the Blue Line in Rosemont out to Hoffman Estates along the Northwest Corridor and connect to the outer circumference railroad commonly known as the EJ and E Railway. He stated the project would need to coordinate land acquisition and the actual plans which are being coordinated through the Northwest Municipal Conference. He stated the Village would need to consider committing approximately $20,000 over a four- year period with $4,000 committed for 2004. He stated the project is at least ten years out from any kind of construction work starting with the proposed corridor running adjacent or very near the Northwest Tollway corridor. He said the Village would benefit from a station on the south end of town and would assist in the economic viability of the south end of the community. He stated there would be opportunities in the future to determine future financial commitments. Village representatives have participated in the Task Force process to date and have been involved in the planning stages. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: It was mentioned that this is an opportunity to improve the transportation modes between suburbs without the expansion of existing roads, which does not always address the volume issues. Consensus of the Village Board was to participate in the funding request in the amount of $4,000 for 2004. 2 VII. POTENTIAL CODE AMENDMENTS Community Development Director Bill Cooney stated this discussion is a continuation of the previous Code potpourri discussion which took place almost two months ago. Administrative Subdivisions Staff occasionally encounters properties that may appear to be a single lot but in actuality they consist of two or more parcels. When reviewing any type of development proposal for these properties including additions, deck projects, etc., it is often difficult for staff to apply the required setbacks due to the property's configuration. Due to these circumstances, staff has traditionally required that the property owner apply for a Plat of Consolidation that would create a single lot of record from the existing multiple lots. The Plat of Consolidation process, however, currently requires review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission and final approval by the Board of Trustees. This review and approval process can create delays and additional expenses for the property owner. As a result, staff is requesting the Village's Development Code be amended to allow administrative subdivisions under specific circumstances. The process would still require the preparation and recordation of the Plat of Consolidation but under certain circumstances would eliminate the need for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approval by the Village Board. The existing regulations and proposed amendments are as follows: Existinq Requlations Preliminary Plat/Final Plat approvals require review and recommendation by the Village's Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by the Board of Trustees. Proposed Amendments Staff proposes that an Administrative Subdivision is a subdivision that may be approved by the Director of Community Development and does not require a public meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission or approval by the Village Board of Trustees. The definition of Administrative Subdivision is: Administrative Subdivision shall be: A. An adjustment of a lot line between two (2) adjoining lots; and B. The consolidation of two or more lots, parcels or tracts of land, either in whole or part, into a single lot of record, when all of the properties are under the same ownership. With respect to Administrative Subdivision be permitted, it shall be permitted only if; (1) no non-conformities are created with respect to these regulations; and (2) the entire length of the subdivision fronts on an existing street. Consensus of the Village Board was to accept staff recommendation for Administrative Subdivision review. 3 Conversion of Garaqes into Livinq Space It is not uncommon to see property owners convert garages into living spaces. In reviewing the requests for conversion, it was found that there are no provisions to remove the garage door as long as all applicable building and health safety regulations are met. Staff is recommending that the Building Code be amended to require removal of the garage door and the use of exterior building materials that are consistent in both material and color with the remaining portion of the home's exterior. n Consensus of the Village Board was to accept staff recommendation for conversion of attached garages into living space. Commercial Trailers in Residential Districts Village Code currently contains specific regulations regarding the storage of commercial vehicles and trailers within Residential Zoning Districts. . Staff is recommending the Village Code be amended to specifically prohibit the outdoor storage of commercial trailers within any of the Village's Residential Zoning Districts. To help clarify the regulations, staff is also recommending specific definitions for both commercial vehicles and commercial trailers. The proposed amendment would allow for outdoor storage of no more than one commercial vehicle within a residential zoning district and prohibit the outdoor storage of commercial trailers. The definition of a commercial trailer is any trailer (1) containing work equipment such as ladders, snow plows and/or mechanical tools to carrying of work machinery on or affixed to the outside of the trailer, (3) containing a refrigeration unit or other motorized compressor, or (4) being used for storage shall be considered commercial trailers. None of the following shall be considered a commercial trailer: (a) recreational trailer that is not included within the above categories, (b) government trailers, or (c) police or fire trailers. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: It was suggested that staff consider utilizing an envelope size for consideration of trailer size similar to what is utilized for commercial vehicles and residential properties. Consensus of the Village Board was to direct staff to create a definition defining trailers within a specific measurement envelope. Arbors and Trellises The Village Code currently does not contain any regulations regarding arbors or trellises. Currently, staff is utilizing fence regulations and applying Code requirements to installation of arbors and trellises. Staff is proposing specific regulations defining arbors and trellises which also limits their size and location. Staff is requesting arbors and trellises be a maximum one arbor or trellis not exceeding eight feet in height or ten feet in width and shall be permitted except in any required front yard. General comments from Village Board members included the following item: There was a question whether trellises should be even considered for a regulation. It was also suggested that a clearer definition separating what is a fence from what is a trellis should be considered. It was also suggested that additional location elements be considered and specific materials. 4 Consensus of the Village Board was to request additional staff review to further hone the definitions for clarification purposes. FAR and Related Definitions Staff continues to see a large amount of construction activity related to single-family dwellings including additions and construction of new single-family homes. The recent trend in development has been to maximize the amount of living space within single-family homes often pushing the edge on a variety of bulk regulations including setbacks, height and floor- area-ratio (FAR). Part of the clarification necessary is the need to consider the entire bulk on the property along with the entire footprint upon the property. Such definition would include garages, basements and attics. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: It was suggested that since the basement is part of the living space, it should be considered in the overall bulk square footage for the property based on the ceiling height of the basement. It was also suggested that there is a need to address the massing of the house including the porch as part of the FAR. It was questioned whether the basement should be part of the FAR since it is already part of the building mass even though it is below grade. There were comments that there would still need to be some kind of regulation on the depth of the basement. There was also discussion regarding the definition of an attic and story within the building as determined by usable livable space now or in the future. Consensus of the Village Board was to direct staff to consider a porch as part of the FAR possibly at a reduced percentage of the total and get additional Planning and Zoning Commission input. The Village Board further directed staff to review basement and story (attic definitions) to address massing concerns. VII I. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Village Manager Janonis stated that Winter Festival Parade on December 6 was successful and the next Coffee with Council is December 13. IX. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Trustee Wilks commented on the recent passing of former Senator Paul Simon and requested the Village Board consider a Resolution of Condolences to the family. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:03 p.m. DS/rcc Respectfully submitted, :=t:>~ ~{jJ DAVID STRAHL Assistant Village Manager 5 Date:~ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: . L(:),~~\l',~~K ~ ~ -' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE II €Ac;rQt~ ~ ù~ ~ ~&.).).~ ~v:-€, N€k) '~I"'IA""E RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: ~ tC.t 4&'~ TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: ~/ccl ~ Elected Official/St f * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: ladel: -- - H:\VILM\Cow\CQW Items Form.doc I 12/03 Date: I - b'> o\.\ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS \..e.FE>'IC SUBJECT: 'De Çe.,,~,«\ Pn:o It"c~-ç o.vJ. Ð\'{v'¡;LhcVlLJ tv\-} BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE Pr'Î",ch. o..vld r/O({/L?lw.~ \r~....~ ~e.~~" (~A.. nil' C-\~-kf,¡r-d {.'I,avcr S o. \ \ ð.. 'e ~ ~1AAJl:\-{ eu<t' iA \-vc.,.l\y ,"~e(\. o..ð...&.. ifeÇ.{ e (Å ' . \-\r'Q... \- \.NI\\ -\c> \oe- RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: .Do('.. ve\CI \' l' \C;IV¡ e'Jtti' (\c;~ '~i' ~ ct\'\<t'.. ; -h, .~ ""~ -\W.se Ii\JW,^ ',""",-c<.Vl f \C{ \ \...1 TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: D\>t.-'J~S~'~~ o\o'^l:( W\\-\.A \ QV\C¡ - \('n we. ( l Ç'\,^CtVl(\(¡ t -p\C1 vI . h~v...J 0 , Elected Official/Staff bvb '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* '* * * '* * * '* * '* * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: > -- Skowron: Wilks: Zade!: 12/03 H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc /". Date: /--¿ -~~ . SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS . FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: . C4lira¿.,. /A1t'Þ ~éV'ð' ~~¿. ~ \J. F? :tt BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF IS'SUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE ~IJA/I /~,';J~aJI1~~ ¿I~;it!: dfeJ:¡./ ~ IN -r-1!fil, p'~r 3 ¡::j .s~ 'Ý ~ . , RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: ~/N'¡:;' /MI'~c.:r ~ df6e, Þ~I?~ <t- IP 7hb5Æ PJ;leJrl ~ /P1I"CÆ.-*fl¡,é... h",,/> (#!: p~ ~(/'¿:;WV6 ~ ~~e:s ¡¡¿;I!:. ~£ TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No -- Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: Farley: Corcoran: Hoefert: Lohrstorfer: -- -- -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc 1$ 12/03 Date: j- 6'-0'--( SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: -rv "'f.\.. ~~1 \CtlA,( "f D(~(,;,..Ü( $),^, \-ÇtF~JS: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE \,v l +- '" f'eLt'-'l \- {J 1rC\""-' --c\o,--,--,""'" e}-f ..ç,"'c\ \aÙO\.~(f5 (\\+~V'"V\G~h\J't"~ tí~'t"(.~ I \-0 $e ch.t' '-' v!'( t'c\~r b.,.,\c\\v\c1 -\--4 "^^- ï.xlC \c v~ RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: De ,¡d or Y \tl,^ .ç:-~ .ç~",,\ h..\UI.( c«S \.:u(~ \"", 'V\'1 \ VIi:! lJ i:> , '+0 C-I.ff' C Y if \C,{ k '\f"v~\ ß , TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: DiJ v~~('(.~ a\V"". f ¡;.:¡ \ \- \rl \Ð v'1- rc-lV\cl (' '(.'\A.Ci"\((L! \ . fl«V\ . D~\'\c~ Of Ev b Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: - -- Skowron: Wilks: lade!: 12/03 H:\VILM\CoW\CQW Items Fonn,doc It:. SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS ,)1 LM ìLL) ,A ,/ / /' Id- ~ G/¡ 6J u ¡) ( /,¿~t::S f-4. c:' ") SUBJECT: ,. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: ~., f) ¿;J£J7f reiJ, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * i J I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: ladel: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc -- 2. 12/03 Date: 'V\Jô-L SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS ß U~.I ~l> / (Lv ,JrJirJl, /W kLtL (,J ~ ð¡¡~ gj1V¿cr rf ( SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: JJ 01 W '7~/-' .~C-{¿ f:.ctT +1ð-f S. (~I)(;' uJk-v¡¿S' , 'J7 F- W£ ~ ~ Æ v4-vJ ~ /) .0 Ð--- F'i:) ¡- I pv ~ .0 '.TÙ ~ ¡.~ K.. ¿ ~ ( 'T, uJ <L. ¡pt-¿ A-=1 '¿C$ ¿ ù t= 4- c<£1>h. C1()ùi-T ~1 () D (JÙ's~ ¿E C O.r-J C- ( L 2:.. Oilt ,fKMJ J ~ / ~. -r I/VV\ Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes Farley: Corcoran: Hoefert: Lohrstorfer: No Yes No Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: -- -- -- -- H:\VILM\Cow\CQW Items Form.doc ~ 12/03 Date:~ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS ~ ~l-.Ác..~~' ~~ ~~ Co "f SUBJECT: -' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: (£ . "T'b ~ ~ù~L~t:.Ù4St'!.. ~. ~~ ~ O~ ~IL-b ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Farley: COiCOian: Hoefert: Lohrstorfer: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form,doc Yes No Yes No -- Skowron: Wilks: lade!: -- -- -- 4 12/03 Date:~ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: L ~" (}14.-D BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE ./~c ~ l2~ Il~ ~V. Ajo wf4tlw# -r~. ,.~. ~Sù t1..l! tI au.,,~ ' ~ J.F ... LI ,,~.bo<¡S .srIoù LA J..J t! ~ l!A~ 4J~...øS "~I b iJA"T"~~ ~,,-ntr€S A c.~ ,~'-r RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: j4ý,~~~ .AFPr2~ TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: L~ {ì ðIl, ~ Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -~ Lohrstorfer: - -- Skowron: Wilks: lade!: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc 5 12/03 SUBJECT: -' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: Date:~ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS ~Mtl('£~1L "~þ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ MŒ1'1 ~ M . b. F~ t 0'.3 . "T'O ~-"..¡:j c c..4r(... ~~ cÇ ~~ UF - -r ~ ~ z.4 T~G:( t"^~~ Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Farley: Corcoran: Hoefert: Lnhrstorfer: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form,doc Yes No Yes No -- Skowron: Wilks: - ----- ---- ----- Zade!: -- -- ro 12/03 SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOlUTION/CHAN GE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: Date: j- '-!-ð'f SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS ~ t..a.. ¥... ( ~ 'þ I CT1 0"" 4~ ~A-.AJ s.;=eß- Po \". \ Co. 't ( .:I:'"þoÏ' ) Cou...,...-'-¡ ') . }) ) ~ .:.'-""-'So OS . ~ N£ë;.,o ~ (L ~J ¡(.. . hA1,vT~~CL ~IJ J~IUJv:e.,...,~ CfF c.~.Ñ ~'tS .. rCb}c.~(... i2i . (A ~ J,I-.{t-""TO 1'1.? . ~) t::c ~ 7'1 :ß. ~ s S. E. 2.(. (~~ it>~;:' ') :J:.OoTJ~U4V"(Y -l()oa...r~" t.. ¡;~ c:..~( 0 /woc.-p /~~~Ì"1~ ..i: L...A:)o&..r ~. No. TO P ~ .;,. ¡II ~ c..;- J+ ..,... ~ t!f> R. ¡, If'- f7- . ...-- ~ k.1t.. I ~ 0 I C. -n ~;I\" '- T ~ F'EA.. 1""0 6. ~ T-tf£.. ~-It't1~~ )",,-I'AcVië..A~. jY1 A.¡t.. J). 3 ~ )... 0 () '-/ - A-N () fJ EM- Elected Official/Staff **********************************.***********~***~************ I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: No Yes No Yes Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: lade!: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc -- 1 12/03 Date: 1- ¿".; ~o Ý SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: Ge"",J 7E.tLJOJ/J IÛef..crrJA-TtO,JJ wI ~T 1a ( f:.f:: ..qIYh bv/l,é;.. .t Re.. I.JAßJ L.f:r'ME. c;e,Jr-AAL rzJ:>. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE . ÞoI ~~~ "T'-"E:. \.1\1 I ,\c,s, ~,(e aJetL. M~Y\Ir :J. 4~ A Co.....\'i:wl117 N :J7ttf.4 S h c.OClItJ c'¿' CEN~ tZ.i:> L r f1o1l!~ ( (;;;t.. ~ oF IZ£~Lf-n\.T'ð~. ,J~ AltQ)]'?I 5~Ol1~oJ C8".JJ/peA. ~,t\\£I "nIf.s., /v.:Þ {~~(Jl'r~,FLX.. ~J¡;: ~ ¡7á::JEJlE . / . A ~ (1Jt'TU- A s:, '~ ~~16..1 L1¡::r::. "1-0.5 Orr.tI"A f'i:~ Q: ~. Cú(l.u-.~ ¡:";APw-P{ APPt.Jt..TE:IoJA,yJLI;.. S RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: Cþ./j¡?¡4¿ ,ep Ilt4frtt>'/¿.ÞIHJ'S A,(!e A- CATlt:L,;. A5&~ 7ArI~fl. . /hHfj ~tt:r~11fJN ~III£M~ ÍIJ .¡.. T/MibdUl WC-tA'PtttUIZ. IV~G6' 1t1-rE..- N:¥AJ ~ se:r 7'l,..,~ ~At ~ ÆL ~ -Ø4i!: n4... -/MT $ð (,.J1f:, GÅV 'U,..J ;:'01.. FéJttJ,(é M;4/~r q.r7J ~;~u 'A1~>} ~ J>1,JW.s~~~,4.JA¡'> sI ,¡ì!øvfPç ScJ¡t4:xIL~ ¡;fJ{t.. ~/!. _M4ð (.A:Jltt..¡¿' 8'1 ~ 61" ;:-1 #a Ý . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~~e.c:e~. ~~:i~I:~~: .. .. . 'b. ~~ I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: ladel: -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc 1A 12/03 Date: }- 'j- oy SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: Co /l"1 .E. 0 ~ T ¡f...} h ¡tr J ;N ~ A ~ ,t.E. ~ e".n- UP IJA-TE.. rttJ:. 11 :-;s c::r ,-) J +J-k ClLlut:~T ~ , +t r LA-> or i4E. J 6 n.;ø.~~T. í' .u.s.~ , ST4F¡:/. ~ J~o/l-1h -e-dPE..f) A~ ~,..( A 1-æ:-vr$¡;;"¿} V~tt$IO'...,.) br Co~~ S ) C t:;) AX:: ~ tV\... ~ c:..¡:. c:; r- ,He II . ¡. . ~ 5 I <'-,..; :S nq.-rr s ,Z£c..ohh~¡()M A-~Åé.¡;Ñ~1 . M A-tt-.;13 ;J.. 00 'f , ~ 0 t...-ç.IL Elected Official/Staff *************************************************************** I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: No Yes No Yes Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Ilems Form.doc -- e 12/03 Date: )- 'i-elf SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTU RE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: ;; ÐO'-I CM JT1+c... :p¡t,~, u..fllJ;f-/E- ~ 5~ of } f"ë... S~-s . ~ \ 6.r i1+E- tl t""2>. OÑ ,4....t... c:A-t6 )~ Ce/'.'S'c;;¡-Jt,\.A,..c:.ï1 0,...) 7 ¡t..O~ è.c..-t-S $<::-t+"Mc.A-c...ë.I) J ^' '71+f.. V I (., ~ t. Fe ÇI\... ~ ^ a:=:. 1../ Co ^' '£;T1l,,~Jï I:) N ~ ~ 0-,) . t..L f ~ --r7I2. y. t, ø,.., i7f1i- ~,. ¿:"o /U" , -" c:p..J 0F- T H-i:- ,,;, .... c.. A-C- ~ So J '/C -""" t... -¿.so f:::) po ~~e -Z.)-S. . 1M ;::..oA./Lt A- ìï ~ - ? v.. ~ \.., Co ~ 0 (L G ,5. tJ:) I u.- '?w'"" De.. A- hM U 6TH- At,..\.. ?~-zE-c-J> ?~\.e.:JN .. A ~p~ ~I "'~ ~So 'i>é!- f~Î3 t,(>ff£/J --pø-~ T+H!. (þ ¡¡,..v. ~ P t...'- Ð U c:... . J"1 Prl- . J 3 ) ~oO '"f A-N 0 t-ê:Il- Elected Official/Staff *************~************.*******************~**************** I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Farley: -- Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: - H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc Yes No Yes No Skowron: Wilks: lade!: -- q 12/03 Date: J - '1-0]' SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE 'SJoll~ ~E-A- IN\JE-J-.IìOsGY (NPDi:.S- NÂ-"o,..:sl'r-'- YOLtr(r..~r -p~~ CL.I~'~~ 5'f~. "$-rA-~ ç1...:a::~t::J,;4...T ~ 0,4-/ ^""~ ~ t8;.~. ~FF- ~) u- 1'/t.ëS.~ ~u ~ o!L() /;J~c.it SUBJECT: C ~érf£.S --,- -fh+- J A7\-I!. l'~~~ ~ Y6"A. C-~,P [,.1 ~ c..E. L..) ".,., Irl-~ N P f) ¡¿. <7 ¡¿ u., t, ~ ~ ¡O j2.. Þ-<f> u.. ¿.. -Æ=rr cP-V So . RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: VI 'ß . It-P P ~\.. of=- 0 ~ "'}.....v ~c::..a. c,~~~ . TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: /VfA~ )/) )..00'1 ~Ð l, C:/l- Elected Official/Staff *************************************************************** I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: lade!: -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc If) 12/03 Date: \-~, .0,-\ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: Lc'\\'\\--\.-, "- V\~ \,0'" C""'l (. e, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE tV1'<I'..:'",,-11 v 'f-. \.-2.- e ;11\" \ -\- \ P \~ \'\yt",/.~ c£- NU",.-"t...'\c:e I \\'\c\.....A""'1 oS'I c?- -(.1 \ '<'I.\:. .\d-! (vv1"Í<r'\~ìe- , RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: Ù \~ l" viS Cot t -te or V\."'- {. I vel *-0 (v 1r"'" ~--,-.t- 111\1 U -"cu", '-- €' f""C' (rrc'll.M. . TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: tv\......~ \ \ 'Zoo\\ I ~Cl...\J 0, G-b Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: ' Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc / I 12/03 Date: } - L.j-oL( SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: - -l.l.L.L.LJ=:.. L~ /'1 ~~I ~ (- "5> (:);"'1 m ~ ë.,-;) / $1 é)~A-'-)t::$. . u...-r/c..: IT '-( G~I'~'E.-~ N~ ("0 ~ 0 (] ¡:. -ft (...\.. ~ IL L ~ ~ h A-/wt::::-S It ¡:= , ~ T "i+~ c.~~-' ~ P~~m> ~ ~~'"þ. }) ,~ ~s.s. / :A /Jorc ðfUJ/~æ. , J P. AfG'¡t.o/,(../~~ t.1..& '"f / /, Zoo If . A- N 0 t...E".IL . Elected Official/Staff ********************************************~***~**~*********** I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: -- Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: - Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc -- tZ 12/03 Date: )-c¡-oLf SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: No""' c... 0 ,.., l=o ~ I ¡N c:- h A-I L ~ ë:»(.. i:!- 5:Þ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE ;r l/t..~G:.A-'- 17 IT} e"ß D')(..Z-S ( i"tk=-s...¡¡. T~ 'Pc> No-r- ß^,,~Jc::... ~ 1'r'r 14.:ntA,v ¡-¡, T... ß 1,.). I L:j' o=t=- 1b/tA c..I <.. ð"" A- So ~ '^' L ') ß~ ~ 'BE.- ~t)vLo p~ T~ 11..-~1l.... ffut..-JGLaSft-"f'5 . RESO LUTIO N/CHAN G E SOUGHT: v .~ . V 11l-~ ~ -,.-..0 ~ ~ Fa/l..<..:ë- ,*"12- t:::!(..A.~J 0 1-IJ I ~ c.£. TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: }'v\ fr "1 J I J Ã CJ-O '1 Åt-t f} (,1M- Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc /3 12/03 Date: ~ S; 2ø 7' SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THe WHOLE MEETINGS 'I .. f ¡' , 'J<ttŸ SUBJECT: " BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE " RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: ., '^' ¡..9, J ,-~,.-_.. ) ;' * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * / I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: - ; H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc Yes No Yes No Skowron: Wilks: lade!: -- I~ 12/03 SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: Date: )- 'i-of.{ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS ßßrlA«?1Z... i-fA..~ t../~C> ~~, j2~E~L A-Iu.I!J 'IZ,¿)(.c:..U-SI U ii... C-o/Z1/ldE./l.G1 ~ 1?E-F-r.--..S-. FILA ,.v<:- -H-I S £.. . ~r=-r- L..ù J 1...'- r¡t.,Ø?~f' ~~h~,o*"o..4 $ f~r"t- Ht1r ~ C::>L>' () ~~ CJ::¡A-fJf-t. ~A- C ~("'f2..~ To ~ 'i::., 0 $fJ~FIc:ri;-Ì7~ So Fc$"- 14- I'I~ í2Erv..~i[:. ~'""~ ~~. ~ () r¿ 6.. eo Þ rn ~ 1""1 c.:s-.J ~ Co,.:J ~ J 'P œ.,A. ~ /'LOT ~s.' Pëii.A- ~ a.~c..&...LA..S' L1£. ~/I1I!A..CI~ 'fl.£;'F<--$£. ~~ ";Þ£ . -1) )~~Ss. ) 1/ tþ - '¡)/~~,.v ) Æ-//oPl , 0 ILl) I' ,IV A?v c..£.. F- 11- PI' fid)..¡ 1't1iZ- -:r lJ.. r.:J ... ð 12000/ . ~pL,EIL Elected Official/Staff *************************************************************** I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: - H:\VILM\Cow\CQW Items Form.doc Yes No Yes No Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: -- 15 12/03 Date: SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: GØr'V1 vJ/L 2~L tA~ Ç-o-c ¿¿) cife't-5~ p~C/~ ~ ýV'f 'U( CIA<-- ~ ~.-1 '711 ¿ V ( L/C A--V £ '~~ 1\ ð-D '--/I éJ ~) Ik5 IT.- O~ ~;1rV ;A $\) r--J(, i.-P ¿ j ¡;) tJ <?-vi( BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: ~ùP T7or~ Ùt 11 /I ,5' (L ò l¿ (~ C/&-vvJ ,ry¡ f:4~ (~ N I' ,'~lA-e./ /~ ~""'<- ( v') W .A-8 T~ TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: A<:, PM~~ Dr ~ vJ AS~ cc>(,STI2+(ß ~~ Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: ladel: -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc /514 12/03 Date: )- '-1-0'-1 SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: . V A--ß-f 0 \.A S ~-,=r-I C. ~E.I-A-"T"2:.ð lSs ~ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE -1f2 12:.-5} ()~H+-L- - '5~r,N~ (. s~~ jc:>t\.. ~ vn..".4-G.--' s~s ') u..sE. of LfJ5t-1) /$~" $fbA'S - TMrT1C- ~f"? I Ñ '- 4 RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: ?-rt.-LJ ..., 11: v¿ ii» I Ji,..v..:) 61' 7ï ~ S .--. -- z. t- r-<.:1 ¡l.~ J Ñ t:::S ~ ~hlA. N r¡-} e.s;. . ?f1-F~ 'r ~/L1. ~~h1£rN"~Ì"7l>.A-1S. TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: - ......} u..- ]'V ra <6', ~ ~'-I ~f) úVL . Elected Official/Staff *************************************************************** I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: ---- ---- Corcoran: ---- ---- Hoefert: ----- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: lade!: ---- ---- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc I~ 12/03 Date: ,- (, - z.o'¡' SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: 7RA...p:1 t.. ~ S~ ~N\ yr.5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE \lAt.1 A"'~ So ~ 1.-4 &.\. \ TS po/) ~ r£.b I1:>rL .51 M I LAL $. '11j:.~ , ~ ~ of£1'"JM~ 1'HE. 9¥1£. sri ~-r ¡..{~ ",,~~e, c.o.-.1~I~'/Mc.~ . / ) II J-./\.G F-- (¡ I i:>G RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: (DtlAlJ£..A.'íE M Atrq.þ~ -rUtrr :7íui>JE;!, ~I Sr.,..aL,- TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: c..p...~fJU11f.l.i.sT1" (j(:.. 4tJt>e.~AL ~~. By Týa; L. '4... Col\~h'" I p,.'1I,...,...,,'I, ~LL ~l..~ ð~). if. of..r~vJf,. ~,.Jt\6Ue- sraw /.4A.tlr."" (,..,¡ø~E;Ir c.»4~f:.5 I .:)'\1",e; / crr"CI 0 '" S T u þ-\ C6 "" , ~ Jj¡ 'le".ÞI>f ~,,» ) oS UI ~ 14) ,J (~ P æ.... e.....sr ~ 1l'b Ñ ~ I rJ.s. $ r 4-i ~ (i,- , 0 S ~~LJ Elected 0 Icia t ff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc I" A 12/03 Date: 'Z-ð-c) ~ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTU RE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: ::;TÙ f S í ~ ~ C; /'/1 £-,u/) ( S f b.Jj) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE tAJO S'l5~(c e~ ¡~ 0 I-- £-- r-ç-::¿ L 771J,~ A12:S3 - / ~ 51>1-1---<:.... £/// II £ C £M/l ZA-<-- ¡ ¡4-Fn4't-.k i? ~'ÕJ £~ ¡/ / ~S"' :' ~ RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: -=r£.S"\ CA& i- TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: -r YVV1 Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: - -- Lohrstorfer: - Skowron: Wilks: lade!: -- H:\VILM\Cow\CQW Items Form.doc I'" ð 12/03 Date: )- 0/- c L{ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: Co;4-tBJ~'£.{) 5~~ Sft..c...tJy- _F ~ .q.- ~a,.' ð~ f BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE P 2. ~ -e,...r -¡- 6' LA" ~ ~ O,..s ~ L4- t. ~ "I"> Ý ~ <;. I ~ &. ë.-A. I'J G. ') t=i;'ol to I N (.. S 0- ~ --r--rt-A. C€s~O I-r-/~ of TttL VI~':S CcrTt-t b ) Ñ ~ S-~ ~ ? '"fS~ . RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: ? j\.o~~tJ C-ð '7'c;. ,-0 K.~~ Tt+L ~ ~I ~7E-Þ ~ ~~ ~ Co( s~. TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: SHT. ) 'I ').,00'/ I ~~~B-IL Elected Official/Staff ********************************************************....... I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . Skowron: Wilks: lade!: -- /1 12/03 H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: Date: 23 December 2003 SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT. INCREASED DEMAND ON POLICE DEPARTMENT PATROL DIVISION TO ADDRESS RISING LEVELS OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS RELATED TO TRAFFIC LAW VIOLATORS. .-+ THF nFPARTMENT CONTINUES TO EXPERIENCE INCREASED CITIZEN COMPLAINTS OF TRAFFIC LAW VIOLATORS. INCREASED TRAFFIC VOLUMES! AND CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT AND RE-DEVELOPMENT FURTHER EXACERBATE THE MYRIAD OF TRAFFIC RELATED ISSUES AND ENFORCEMENT RESPONSI- BILITIES THE DEPARTMENT'S PATROL DIVISION STRUGGLES TO ADDRESS ON A CONSISTENT AND COMPREHENSIVE BASIS. ¡Ht UtPAKIMENT'S HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT FOLLOW-UPS, OVERWEIGHT TRUCK ENFORCEMENT AND ABILiTY 10 rOCU~ UIKtCltU tNrUKLMtNI Ol~ A SATURATION BASIS REPRESENT JUST A FEW OF THE AREAS WHERE THE DEPARTMENT'S LACK OF A DEDICATED TRAFFIC UNIT NEGATIVELY IMPACTS OUR ABILITY TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE FULL SCOPE OF THE TRAFFIC ENF. ARENA. --~ CREATION AND STAFFING OF A FULL-TIME TRAFFIC UNIT COMPRISED OF FOUR (4) PATROL OFFICERS AND A SUPERVISOR (SERGEANT). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Farley: Corcoran: Hoefert: Lohrstorfer: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc Yes No Yes No -- Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: -- - - -- -- /B 12/03 Date:~ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE S .c£mr£ Â "\i.:ruM.. 1'~'~~ SUBJECT: -' RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: 2a..\~ U~eÇ ~ G:L. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: - -------- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: - Skowron: Wilks: lade!: -- H:\VllM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc /q 12/03 D ate: 7.ATt}'1 SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: k{)o{)7~ f~TlLiS OF L~ /vro -r t--1 Cz.- V I t../l..A--"b <; ~ U5L ~ D vtJ ,.o~.S¡jt-J ¡(){r-J~ Ð of ¿ i C f fl4-¿T7U.J 77) £K? ui/?¿ -f / yý) /4iJ-J~ U { ~ L4--&f-. s ~æ ~~ ~~}' f. \J f'J () ~£ $\ I,/I.j~ f AJL- L,- ~,;j /r--Jl, ~. L ',<~ UV17~ ,#<¿f ¡P Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes Farley: Corcoran: Hoefert: Lohrstorfer: Yes No No Skowron: Wilks: lade!: -- -- -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc -- 20 12/03 Date: ~?tHJ i SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: l ì Lf,rJ{lrvi:.? Ð P /Z--L ~LJ (;{)~MS C&ù ¿ ¡Q í /\J ~~ /h/J /,¿~ /r-GI1 ï7) /2£rJ ~ (tD/lE-;L (rEX \, \JNJ)W-:;;7>~O SC/11/hJ~hJ;~~~~ 0 ¡tJ ¡t1 ~lV yIj II¡ &-5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE -z, '::( ¿) 1'111 Jj, S p~ / Y aD ~ CA1 'i~~ r - RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: Cð-D ~ (À J IV k7~ 0 # y' ~~( t-o .~ L £- C ~/Y7 f4'J 7- s~ ò ¿~ té f..,..JT ~ I kt>tJ 2~¿ I í7i~ TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: ,-( VVv¡ Elected Official/Staff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No -- Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: Farley: Corcoran: Hoefert: Lohrstorfer: -- -- -- '21 12/03 H:\VILM\Cow\CQW Items Form.doc Date:~ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS -' ~ZevI"\T'~ SUBJECT: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE ~Tl u l-r-l Te::. ~~ù (L~ & .4c..'T\"'T'l ~ H.~,f-4.&U Lt-tf-Ac..-r ~ ~£C"t.(.~ RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: ~J~,-;~.. ~ I ~~ TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: . . . * * * * * * * . * * * * * * * * * . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No - -- "Zz, Skowron: Wilks: Zade1: Farley: - - Corcoran: -- -_u - - Hoefert: - ---- lohrstorfer: - --- 12/03 H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form-doc Date:~ SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTU RE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: -' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: . ~f' ~~~.,.. ~ ~~ j"þ/O ~t~4 A. ~ ~ ~ , ~ \~ ~St ~ .J~.1 ~a:!t ~ b ~ ~ ~ t ~'\ ~ -roc.. (.,. E ~~ fí> /N.;r c9 hw -I ~ ~~ CT ~ ~ oa... 'R.Q. ~ A"'T"t ~ f'crtH * * ************* * * ***. ************* **** ************* *** * *** * ." *** I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Farley: - - Corcoran: - ---- Hoefert: -- Lohrstoi fGí: . -- H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Fonn,doc Yes No Yes No Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: 23 12/03 '" Date: 23 DECEMBER 2003 SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS SUBJECT: " BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: POLICE DEPARTMENT TACTICAL UNIT (GANG CRIME AND DRUG INTERDICTION AND SUPPRESSION) THE CURRENT TACTICAL UNIT STRENGTH IS TWO 2 OFFICERS. V LS PROHIBIT THE ASSIGNMENT OF ADDITIONAL OFFICERS TO THE TACTICAL UNIT. THE TACTICAL UNIT CANNOT KEEp I-'Alt WI I H I Ht NttU ¡-UK 11 S OF~ lGER' SEXPÊRÎISE (CONTROLLED DRÛG BUYS, CUHIVATING GANG, DRUG AND OTHER CRIMINAL INFORMANTS, PLA I N CLOTHES (UNDERCOVER)' cArAB! [trIES'). . . .. '., THE DEPARTMENT DESIRES TO EXPAND TACTICAL UNIT OPERATIONS SUFFICIENTLY TO ADDRESS CURRENT NEED LEVELS: 'wÊsÊEktOCREATE TWO (2) THREF MAN TAr.nr.AI IINTT T¡;AMS THE GOßL IS JO DEVELOPE BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE: TAcftêACÜÑIt<fEÂMSCAPABrË'LJ'r:ŠËVËN' DAY A WEEK OPERATIONS. THESE TWO TEAMS WOlJl D RE SIIPFRVISED BY AN ADDITIONAL SERGEANrWHowourrr ËXCLUSÎVELY"oIRECTANô CONTROL THEIR ACTIVITIES. FALL OF F.Y. 2 04 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . -- Skowron: Wilks: Zadel: H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc 12/03 SUBJECT: " BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/PROBLEM INCLUDING VILLAGE CODE REFERENCE, IF APPLICABLE RESOLUTION/CHANGE SOUGHT: TIME FRAME FOR CONCLUSION: Date: /." I' ~ ~D"¡- SUGGESTIONS/POSSIBLE DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS rcl.¡cb £)I:~f' 7"L4H/c, 1::>1 /1"1';-, o~ . . cJr¡~ JJ. rlelV Ph/lv/tI¡\) ;>ét>J~ 1ð . ~ fi:Þ¡'¡:"c, ¡¡;"¡1i,b:.£...un.J'Í # CrJJrJ1ZðL- .... ì)lf{...(/;>t~ at: ~>51.4~ . WIP¡lJ'" n ~UNtr IJ fý ~ I /I't/a..uPlrl'(r 6UÞf:,g- /~¡ø~/ / . ,I1¿~d-~JJ~, Jt.TC. ~,«. /,1 C4HJv"~ c-770¡J (.A),"~ T,1V{:1.rJCJ41- ¡?C/JNÑ/NC- . ~ê.;;CÞS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I concur that there should be discussion. of the above-listed subject matter: Yes No Yes No Skowron: . Wilks: Zadel: Farley: - - Corcoran: -- Hoefert: -- Lohrstorfer: . H:\VILM\Cow\COW Items Form.doc -- 12/03 " -, -".._-- G" ~/!e)ST' ? ~ ,.- , , ..., ORDINANCE NO. 5364 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT .,.: Passed and approved by the President and Board of Trustees the 19th day of August, 2003 Published in pamphlet form by authority of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, the 20th day of August, 2003 ,.-...,-.-___.__d_-- ORDINANCE NO. 5364 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: Section 1.104 entitled "PresIdent Pro T em" of Chapter 1 of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be deleted in its entirety and a new Section 1.104, entitled "Designated President Pro Tem" shall be added to Chapter 1 of the Mount Prospect Village Code which shall be and read as follows: Sec. 1.104. Designated President Pro Tem. A. Creation of Office: Powers and Duties. There shall be in the VH!age an office known as Designated President Pro Tern. The person appointed to such office shall be authorized to perform all functions and duties the Village President is empowered to perform. but only under the following circumstances: (1) The Village President has absented him.self or herself from the Village and has notified the Manager's office of such absence; or (2) The Village President is under a temporary disability, which has been. ac~nowledged in writing, preventing the President from performing his or her duties; or (3) When immediate action is reQuired of the Village President and good faith attempts to locate him or her have been unsuccessful within the time in which the action is required. If any of the circumstancesdesçribedjn(1), (2) or (3) above are found to exist as to both the Village Presidtmt and the Designated President Pro Tern, the Board of Trustees shall elect one of its members to act as President Pro T em, who during the absence or disability of the President and the Board of Trustees shall perform the duties. 1 ----"----"-""'" B. Qualifications. No person shall be appointed to the office of the Designated President Pro Tem unless he or she is a duly elected or appointed trustee of the Village of Mount Prospect. C. Appointment. The Designated President Pro Tem shall be appointed by a majority vote of the President and Board of Trustees voting jointly. D. Term of Office. The initial term of office of the Designated Pro Tem shall commence on the day of appointment and terminate April 30 of 2004. Thereafter, the Designated President Pro Tem shall be elected at the ~first regular meeting in March, take office on May 1 and seNe until April 30 of the following year, unless the office is vacated by removal. The Designated President Pro Tem may be removed at any time by the affirmative vote of four (4) Board members. E. Acting Village President, Vacancy. If a vacancy occurs in the office of Village President, the Designated President Pro Tem, may, in the sole discretion of the trustees, serve as Acting Village President until such time as a successor to fill the vacancy has been duly elected and has qualified; or the trustees may appoint a new Acting Village President at any time during the vacancy. F. Bond; Oath. The Bond and Oath shall be the same as that required for the Village President. SECTION 2: Section 8.701 "Succession in the Event of Emergency" of Article VII entitled "Succession of Officers" of Chapter 8 shall be amended as follows: 8.701: SUCCESSION IN THE EVENT OF EMERGENCY: A. If during an emergency or natural disaster, the Village Manager dies or is rendered incapable, by absence or otherwise, of performing the duties of the office, the office shall be filled without the necessity of action of the Board of Trustees in the following order of preference until such time as a successor is named and takes office in the manner provided by law: 1 . The coordinator of the Mount Prospect Department of Emergency Services and Disaster; then 2. Assistant Village Manager; then 2 3. Chief of Police; then 4. Director of Finance. B. If during an emergency or natural disaster, the Village President dies or' is rendered incapable, by absence or otherwise. of performing the duties of the office, the office shall be filled without the necessity of action by the Board of Trustees in the following order of preference until such time as a successor is named and takes office in the manner provided bylaw. -' - 1. The Designated President Pro Tern; then 2. The remaining members of the Board of Trustees in order of seniority as determined by the most current continuous months of service and if two (2) or more are of the same seniority, the order of succession shall be determined by alphabstical order until the position has been filled. If neither the Village President nor the Designated President Pro Tem is able to serve, then at the earliest possible time a quorum of the Board of Trustees is able to meet, that Board shall, by a majority vote, appoint one of its members to fulfill the duties of the Village President until the Village President or Designated President Pro Tem is once again able'to fulfill those duties or until such time as a successor is named and takes office in the manner provided by law. SECTION 3: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: Corcoran, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel NAYS: None ABSENT: Hoefert PASSED and APPROVED this 19thday of August \ era a t.Farley, Víllage"presid~llt /,'...---~"" /....;;...~.. _.,;',J ' õJÞ-'" - I~/- , . ".~:.::; -, /' . '.,' 3 . . ,.. MAYOR Gerald L. Farley Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele W. Skowron Irvana K. Wilks Michael A. Zadel VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK Velma W. Lowe I. II. V. VII. VIII. Phone: Fax: TOO: (847) 392-6000 (847) 392-6022 (847) 392-6064 Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 AGENDA MOUNT PROSPECT SOLID WASTE COMMISSION January 15, 2004 CONFERENCE ROOM B, PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD 7:30 PM CAll TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. CITIZEN FORUM IV. SOLID WASTE PROGRAMS/DATA OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS . 2005 Solid Waste Contract Phase 1 - Review of 2000-2004 Contract Bid Specifications NEXT MEETING ADJOURNMENT ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE PLEASE CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS AT 847.870.5640, TDD 847.392.1235. x:1 users/l isa/word/swmse ptAG 2003 MOUNT PROSPECT SOLID WASTE COMMISSION November 20, 2003 MEETING MINUTES PRESENT George Luteri, Rod Mobus, Pankaj Parikh and Mary Winkler Lisa Angell Public Works ABSENT Mary Rosen and Ken Westlake CALL TO ORDER Chairman Luteri called the meeting to order at 7:50 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes from the May 15, 2003 meeting were approved as written. CITIZEN FORUM No individuals were in attendance to address the Commission. SOLID WASTE PROGRAMS AND DATA The Solid Waste Coordinator provided an overview as well as an update on the activities associated with the October 2003 refuse hauler's strike. . Community Awareness - the Village utilized several communication systems including the Reverse 911 phone system. Although considered an excellent tool for contacting residents, at least one of the commissioners stated he never received any of the Village's phone messages. The Solid Waste Coordinator stated the Village was aware that some of the attempts were unsuccessful due to the technology of the phone system. . Drop-off for residential and restaurant waste - ARC sited roll-offs at Public Works, Public Works staff coordinated drop-off. . Multifamily collections - biggest concern during the disruption in service was with the multifamily properties. At the Village's direction during the strike period ARC sent nonunion drivers into the multifamily areas. Overall, the community response was cooperative, very few complaints on how the Village responded. OTHER The Coordinator alerted the Commission that work will need to begin in early 2004 on the next residential solid waste contract; the current contract expires December 31,2004. She asked the Commission to be prepared to begin the evaluation process of the current program/contract. NEXT MEETING The next meeting was scheduled for Thursday, January 15, 2004 in the Public Works Facility, 1700 West Central Road at 7:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, M. Lisa Angell Solid Waste Coordinator X:\US ERS\LANG ELL \ W ORD\swmnov2003.doc MAYOR Gera1d L. Farley VILLAGE MANAGER Michae1 E. Janonis TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michae1e W. Skowron 1rvana K. Wi1ks Michael A. Zadel Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 VILLAGE CLERK Ve1ma W. Lowe Phone: Fax: TDD: 847/818-5328 847/818-5329 847/392-6064 AGENDA DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING LOCATION: 2nd Floor Conference Room Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 MEETING DATE & TIME: Thursday January 15, 2004 3:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - January 8, 2004 IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Sub Area #3 - SOS Mount Prospect V. NEWBUSINES A. B. Sub Area #5 Sub Area #6 VI. CHAIRMAN'SREPORT VII. ADJOURNMENT Any individual who would li"ke to attend thisJ.11~~!iIlg,bufbeca.use of a.disa.bility needs som.e accom.fuodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064. .,."",~,".."."",.'.."..,............__..."...",.."" C:IDocuments and SettingsIKDewis,DOMAIN\Local SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLK211-15.04 agenda,doc MINUTES ~ DOWNTOWN AD HOC COMMITTEE PHASE n 2nd Floor Conference Room, Village Hall Thursday, December 18,2003 3:30p.m. The meeting of the Downtown Ad Hoc Committee of the Village of Mount Prospect was held on Thursday, December 18, 2003, in the second floor conference room of Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. CALL TO ORDER Chairman George Busse called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. Committee members Laurel DiPrima, Jackie Hinaber, Daniel Lee, Elizabeth Lespinasse, Tom Lowe, Jean Reibel, Jim Uszler and Tom Zander were present. David Lindgren was absent. Also present were Bill Cooney, Director of Community Development and Marisa Warneke, Neighborhood Planner. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the December 11, 2003 Committee meeting were reviewed and approved unanimously after some minor revisions were incorporated. OLD BUSINESS Sub-area #1 Chairman Busse asked the cormnitté:e ú1é:mbers for a<iditional input regarding final recommendations for sub- area # 1. Ms. Reibel stated that pursuant to the concept raised by Mr. U szler at the last meeting, she felt that the best redevelopment opportunity was to acquire and demolish all properties on the small triangle area and to reconstruct a 3-story mixed.::üsêdevelopment fronting along Rte. 83 including across the existing Busse A venue right-of-way. She stated that her concept plan would include approximately 10,000 sq.ft. of retail with two additional floors of residential condomi11iums. She st.lted that the vvesté:rn portion of the small triangle area and the remaining Busse Avenue right-of-way would be reconfigured to provide surface parking for this area. She stated that the vehicular access would be eliminated from Rte. 83 onto Bussé: Avenue but that a porte cochere would be installed to allow pedestrian access through the proposed new building. Her concept would also require the acquisition of the 2 West Busse building and the reconstruction of this building to allow for a wider sidewalk along the west side of Rte. 83. There was general discussion among the group about the concept that was proposed by Ms. Reibel. Chairman Busse stated that he felt that this concept went far in incorporating many of the concepts discussed in the previous meeting afid he felt it would be an ideal redevelopment concept. There was discussion regarding the ecofiomic reality of the plan. Mr. Cooney stated the current Tn<' did not have the capacity to fund the acquisition proposed under the plan but that future meetings in January would cover various financial alternatives to move forward with the downtown effort~ There was also discussion regarding types of uses that would be appropriate in sub-area #1. There was consensus that the focus inthisareashQul<iþe forrestaurqnt and entertainment uses to create a district that is more vibrant in the evening hours. It was felt that the redevelopment proposal would provide a greater visibility to the north Busse storefronts and the new buildings that would be constructed. The cormnittee also discussed development opportunities on the northeast comer of Wille Street and Busse Avenue. This property currently is a surface parking lot serving the Meersman Law Offices on the small triangle. It was generally agreed that this would be a prime opportunity for redevelopment, possibly including the adjacent law offices and hairstyle building, to create a larger redevelopment parcel. There was general discussion regarding the overall architectural style that would be appropriate in this area. It was agreed that any new development would need to complement the existing architectural styles in the sub-area and create a transitional area to the adjacent commercial and residential areas surrounding these properties. Chairman Busse asked for a motion supporting this development concept. Mr. Uszler moved to recommend that sub-area #1 be re<ieveloped in a manner consistent with the discussion that had taken place this afternoon. Ms. DiPrima seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Sub-area #2 Mr. Cooney provided a general overview of sub-area #2. This area contains the existing Village Hall, the new Lofts & Shops development and the Continental Bakery and Sakura commercial buildings. Mr. Cooney Downtown Development Ad Hoc Committee December 11, 2003 Minutes Page 2 indicated the original plan called for the complete redevelopment of this block with three mixed-use buildings with maximum height of 4-5 stories. He stated that the Village Hall property was under an option agreement with Norwood Builders to construct a mixed-use development. He stated that the initial submittals by Norwood called for a 6-story mixed-use development on the Village Hall parcel. There was a discussion regarding the height in relation to the Lofts & Shops buildings and it was agreed that 6-stories should be the maximum height on the sub-area #2 block. There was also general discussion regarding the Sakura and Continental buildings. While the committee agreed that it would be ideal to redevelop those parcels to create a greater setback along Rte. 83, given the lack of funds to pursue this and the successful businesses that currently exist in these buildings, that it would not be considered priority to redevelop both those parcels in conjunction with the Village Hall site. The committee did agree that consideration should be given to ensuring that underground parking could be extended under those properties if they were redeveloped in the future. The committee also discussed what would be appropriate from an architectural standpoint for the new building on the Village Hall site. There was extensive discussion regarding the appropriateness of the roof treatments for the new building. It was agreed that the faux façade design that was incorporated in the Residences project should not be continued on this site and that a pitched roof would be more appropriate. Sub-area #3 Mr. Cooney provided an overview of the existing conditions and proposed action plan for sub-area #3. He stated that the 1998 plan called for rowhomes to be constructed along the entire Emerson frontage between Busse Avenue and Central Road. He indicated that the Village owned the northern portion of the block while BankOne owned the middle half and Wallace Busse owned the two single-family homes on the south half of the block. There was discussion about the appropriateness of rowhome development along this stretch ofland. There was general support for pursuing this type of development. There was also discussion regarding a recent group called SOS Mount Prospect that is looking to preserve the northern vacant land owned by the Village for an open space. The general consensus of the committee was that this would not be an appropriate location for a greenspace in the downtown area and that the best place for green space on that block would be the south end two lots as they become available. That land also has mature trees similar to the land across from the Library. The concern of the committee is that if the vacant land at the north end of the block were to remain a park, the entire block becomes impractical to develop. The whole economic picture needs to be considered in deciding what is best for the future of downtown Mount Prospect. The park idea in itself is a good one, but a park should be nearer the center of downtown, across Emerson St. from the city hall plaza, so it can serve as a vital, active piece at downtown festivals and civic occasions. In addition, a park at the north end of the block along Central A venue would raise safety concerns with conflicts between children and the busy street. A park at the south end of this block would be much more user friendly and complement the entire downtown redevelopment plan. In addition, the committee felt that the Village should move forward in the very near future to complete the rowhome project on this property. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Chairman Busse stated that he would be out of town on January 24th, which is the date that staff had initially planned for a public meeting. He asked if January 31 st would work for other committee members and the majority of the committee indicated that it would. Mr. Cooney said he would look into securing that date for a public meeting. ADJOURNMENT The Committee agreed to hold their next meeting on January 8, 2004. The meeting was adjourned at 5: 15 p.rn. Respectfully submitted, William J. Cooney, Jr., AICP Director of Community Development