HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 03/22/2000Next Ordinance No. 5095
Next Resolution No. 8-00
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
- PLEASE NOTE DATE CHANGE-
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Wednesday
50 South Emerson Street March 22, 2000
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P,M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
I1. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaeie Skowron
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Prikkel
IV. INVOCATION: Mayor Farley
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 7, 2000
VI. APPROVE BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
Vii. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION: "SENIOR CELEBRATION DAY"
May 10, 2000
B. PROCLAMATION: "INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WEEK"
April 2~8, 2000
ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT
THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE A T 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064.
C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SISTER CITIES
COMMISSION (Exhibit A)
D. Appointments
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IX. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 26-99, 820 E. Rand Road, Taco Belt/KFC
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND
VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 820 EAST
RAND ROAD (Exhibit B)
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use and variations for the establishment
of a Taco BelI/KFC restaurant, with a drive-through facility. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended approval, with conditions, by a vote of 5-0.
B. ZBA 35-99, 1712 Martha Lane
1st reading Of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1712 MARTHA LANE Exhibit C)
This ordinance grants a variation for the construction of a 672 sq. ft, garage.
The original request for a 720 square foot garage was denied by both the
Zoning Board of Appeals (4~1), and the Village Board (5-0); revised plans
were submitted and approved by the Village Board on March 7, 2000.
C. ZBA 02-00, 120 N. Yates Lane
(This case was deferred from the March 7 Village Board meeting).
The petitioner is requesting a variation to reconstruct an existing wood deck that
encroaches three feet (3') into a required 7.5 foot side yard setback; the existing
deck was built without a building permit. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended approval by a vote of 5-0.
D. ZBA 05-00, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect
1¢~ reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 14
(ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE CODE Exhibit D)
This ordinance amends Chapter 14, C-R Conservation Recreation Zoning District,
relative to uses and facilities in parks. The Zoning Board has recommended
approval by a vote of 5-0.
E. ZBA 37-99, Phase lB Downtown Redevelopment, Norwood Builders
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS PHASE 1B OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT, AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND MAIN STREET (Exhibit E)
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for a Planned Unit Development
at the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street, for 19,380 square
feet of retail space and 34 condominium units with underground and
surface parking. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a
vote of 5-0.
X. NEW BUSINESS
A. PC 01-00, 301 S. I-Oka Avenue, St. Raymond's Parish
The petitioner is requesting exceptions from the Development Code for storm
water detention and street light installation,
B. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BE'I~NEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE RESOURCE
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIVING (Exhibit F)
C~ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETVVEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND HOPE NOW, INC. (Exhibit G)
D, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE SUBURBAN
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL, INC. FOR THE ACCESS TO CARE
PROGRAM (Exhibit H)
E. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETVVEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE RESOURCE
CENTER FOR THE ELDERLY FOR SENIOR SHARED HOUSING (Exhibit I)
F. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE CAMP FIRE
BOYS AND GIRLS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO COUNCIL FOR THE
NEW HORIZONS PROGRAM AND CAMP KOOL SUMMER PROGRAM (Exhibit J)
G. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BE-I'WEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE BOY SCOUTS
OF AMERICA-NORTHWEST SUBURBAN COUNCIL, INC. FOR THE
LEARNING FOR LIFE PROGRAM Exhibit K)
H. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CLAYGROUND, INC. (Exhibit L)
I. A RESOLUTION AUTHORiZiNG THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CLUB REC PLEX (Exhibit M)
J. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE CEDA
NORTHWEST SELF-HELP CENTER (Exhibit N)
K. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION BY THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT FOR OPERATION GREEN LIGHT FUNDS FROM THE
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Exhibit O)
L. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE V ENTITLED "METERS
AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit P)
This ordinance authorizes the Village to increase water and sewer rates.
XI. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. Catch basin and inlet cleaning
2. Catch basin and inlet repair
B. Request for approval of solid waste services contract, 2000-2004
C. Request for approval to accept State of Illinois bid for purchase of one new
car for Engineering Division
D. Request to accept proposal for amendment to the agreement for Central Road
Improvement Project, and request for approval of final Change Order
E. Request for authorization to begin process of issuing $2,165,000 of
general obligation bonds for flood control projects
F. Request to accept proposal from, and increase contract amount with, Wolff Clements
for the development of Corridor Design Guidlelines
G. Status Report
Xll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Xlll. CLOSED SESSION
LITIGATION 5 I LCS 120/2 (c) (11) -"Litigation, when an action against, affecting or on behalf
of the particular public body has been flied and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal,
or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for
the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting."
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MARCH 7, 2000
CALL CALL TO ORDER ·
TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7 35 p m
ROLL CALL
ROLL CALL Present upon roll call Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee R~chard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Dennis Pnkkel
Trustee M~chaeie Skowron
Trustee Irvana W~tks
Absent Trustee T~mothy Corcoran
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PLEDGE Trustee Lohrstorfer led the Pledge of Allegiance
INVOCATION INVOCATION
Trustee W~lks gave the ~nvocabon
MINUTES APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the m~nutes
of the regular meeting held February 15, 2000
Upon roll call Ayes ~Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prlkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None
Mobon carried
BILLS APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee W~lks, moved to approve payment of the
following b~lls
General Fund $ 479,948
~ Refuse D~sposal Fund '" · 225,043
Motor Fuel Tax Fund · 41,848
~ Commumty Development Block Grant Fund 183
Debt Service Funds 300
Capital Improvement Fund 19,719
Capital Improvement Construction Fund
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 462,179
Street Improvement Construcbon Fund
Flood Control Construction Fund 1,000
Water & Sewer Fund 37,751
Parking System Revenue Fund 6,675
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 31,462
Vehicle Replacement Fund 14,997
Computer Replacement Fund 14,350
R~sk Management Fund 212,558
Pohce Pension Fund 23,794
F~re Pension Fund ' -, 20,685
~, Flexcomp Trust Fund 17,295
Escrow Deposit Fund 27,974
Benefit Trust Funds 544
~ $1,638,305
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron. WIIks
Nays None
Mobon camed
ADD AGENDA ADD AGENDA ITEM ~ .... ? · "'~ ~
ITEM Mayor Farley stated that there was a new ~tem to be considered under "New Bus~ness" at
th~s meebng ~
Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Pnkkel, moved to add an ~tem to the March 7,
2000 agenda for cons~derahon, under "New Bus~ness" , ~
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None ' .,~
Motion carned
MAYOR'S ~ ' "~ "~
MAYOR'S REPORT
REPORT Mayor Farley proclaimed March 12-18, 2000 as Severe Weather Preparedness Week,
SEVERE and presented the proclamabor~ to Don Anderson, represenhng the Emergency Services
WEATHER D~sasterAgency , , ~, ,,;
WEEK
Mayor Farley proclaimed March 16, 2000 as Absolutely Incredible K~d Day
APPTS There were no appointments made to commissions or boards ,,
CITIZENS CITIZENS TO BE HEARD r ' ', -' '
R~chard Hendncks, 1537 E Emmerson Lane, addressed the Board w~th a number of,
concerns, none of which required acbon by staff or Vdlage Board
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 26-99 ZBA 26-99 Taco BelI/KFC, 820 E Rand Road ' ~
820 E RAND An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would grant a Conditional Use and
RD venations to allow the construcbon of a fast food restaurant w~th a drive-through fac~hty
TACO BELL
Th~s ordinance wdl be presented for second read~ng at the March 22 Vdlage Bo.ard
meeting , ~ ,~ ', ? t
ZBA 35-99 ZBA 35-99, 1712 Madha Lane
1712 MARTHA The petdmner, Marion Klatka, submitted rewsed plans for a Cond~bonal Use permit and
LANE , · vanabon to allow the construcbon of an oversized garage, (24'x28') Mr Klatka's original
plan was for a 720 sq ft garage, that request was demed by both the Zomng Board of
Appeals and the Vdlage Board At the February 15 Wllage Board meeting, ~t was
L suggested that Mr Klatka work w~th staff on rews~ng h~s plans, for a smaller garage
~ , ~ ~ ~, Trustee Pnkkel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur w~th the request of the
pebboner for a two-car garage, w~th d~mens~ons of 24'x28'
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None , ~
Motion carried , ~,
An ordinance wdl be presented for first reading at the March 22 Vdlage Board meeting
NEW AGENDA NEW BUSINESS ~ , ~
ITEM Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to consider the follow~ng item, a
SETTLEMENT ~ mobon for approval of a settlement agreement, not prewously I~sted on the March 7, 2000
AGREEMENT ' ' agenda
~ . Upon roll call Ayes Hoefed, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, W~lks
Nays None
Motion carried ,, ~, ~
Page 2 - March 7, 2000
Trustee Pnkkel, seconded by ~ru~tee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of the respective
, ' Settlement Agreements In the cases of M~rtlnez v. Mount Prosoect, Medrano v. Mount
.. Prospect and Moser v. Mount Prosoect in substanbally the form submitted to the Vdlage
~ ~ Board on March 4, 2000 The Settlement Agreements shall neither obhgate the Vdlage to
a payment of more than $150,000 total for all three cases, nor more than one year's
additional pay for Messrs Medrano and Moser, The Settlement Agreements shall not
contain any ind~cabon of any admission of habdlty on the part of the Village or ~ts
, -employees, but shall prowde for the vacabon of any Judgments entered against the
Vdlage or its employees ~n these matters The Vdlage Attorney shall review the
Agreement prior to ~ts execubon and submit a letter to the V~llage Board ind~cabng h~s
approval of the Agreement Upon the Village Attorney's approval, e~ther the Vdlage
Manager or the Mayor shall be authorized to execute the Settlement Agreements
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None '
'~ Motion carried ~' .... ~ ~
ZBA 02-00 ZBA 02-00, 120 Yates Lane
20 YATES LN Wdham Cooney, Director of Community Development presented the pet~boner's request
. for a vanabon to reconstruct an ex~sbng wood deck that encroaches three feet Into a
required 7 5 foot s~de yard setback, he explained that the exishng deck was prewously
budt without a bu~Id~ng permit The Zomng Board of Appeals recommended approval by
'- a vote of 5-0
Trustee Wdks required as to whether the pebboner budt the ex~st~ng deck At th~s t~me ~t
was found that the per,boner was not at the meebng, however, Trustee Skowron stated
that she had watched the Zomng Board meebng and learned that the pebboner d~d not
build the deck
Due to the petitioner's absence, Trustee Hoefert, seconded by-Trustee Skowron, moved
to defer this case to the March 22 Wllage Board meebng
~ ~ ~ Upon roll ca~l ' 'Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, W~lks
Nays None
- ~' Motion carried '~ '
R~chard Hendncks, neighbor of the pebboner, addressed the Board with objecbons to the
pebboner's request
¢ Trustee Skowron called a point of order, stahng that ~nasmuch as the Board had already
~ made a mobon to defer the subject case to the March 22 meebng, there should be no
further discussion until that time
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, made a motion to call for the question
~ Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays~, None
Motion carried ~
Th~s case wdl be presented again at the March 22, 2000 meeting
ZBA O5-OO
~ ZBA 05-00, Text Amendments, Vdlage of Mount Prospect'
TEXT AMEND- Mr Cooney presented recommendabons for text amendments to Chapter 14, Section VII,
MENTS, CH 14 , oftheVdlageCode, relat~vetoparkd~stncts, as part of the CR Conservabon Recreat~on
Zomng D~stnct The Zomng Board had recommended approval of the proposed
amendments by a vote of 5-0
Page 3 - March 7, 2000
%
, ,.},~,, He stated that Vdlage staff has worked with park district officials ~n the development of
~ ~ 1 ~, ,re, the proposed amendments, however, some Board members expressed concern for
~ / residents hvlng near the parks, and ~nd~cated that they would prefer g~wng those
residents more of an opportumty to be informed of the proposals, primarily because of the
,, amendments which address required setbacks from property hnes, and hght pole heights
,.. Following a detailed d~scuss~on, Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved
to concur w~th the recommendabon of the Zomng Board of Appeals for approval of text
amendments requested ~n ZBA 05-00
,, , Upon roll call Ayes Farley, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron
Nays Pnkkel, Wdks
,,, MOtloncarrled ·~. , ~ ,
An ordinance wdl be presented for first reading at the March 22 meeting of the Vdlage
Board
AMEND CH 18 ~ ~ An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would amend Chapter 18 by
,, ~ estabhshmg vehicle weight restrictions on the port~on of Harvest Lane between Bus~ness
Center Drive and Autumn Lane
HARVEST , ~ , .... ,
Trustee Hoefert, seconded b rustee Skcwron, moved to waive the rule requ~nng two
readings of an ordinance
~ ;,, Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wllks
, , Nays ,None
t, g ~ Motion carried
ORD ,TTrustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance No
',NO 5087 ' '~ ' 5087 . , ~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XX OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None
, ,¢ ,. Motion carried ~
ZBA 37-99
DOWNTOWN ZBA 37-99, Phase 1B Downtown Redevelopment, Norwood Builders
REDEVEL, * ,, A request was presented for a Conditional Use permit for mulb-use Planned Umt
NW HWY &' · ' ' Development at the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Ma~n Street, for a
combined condominium and retad umt structure, w~th underground and surface parking
MAIN ST The Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended approval by a vote of 5-0
Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur w~th the
recommendation of the Zoning Board to approve the request m ZBA 37-99
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron,'Wdks
Nays None
Moboncarned,r. ~ ,,,r.,
An ordinance w~ll be presented for first reading at the March 22 Wllage Board meeting
RECESS ", ,May°r Farley called for a brief recess, less than five m~nutes, at th~s hme,' after which the
STREE~ LIGHT ~ meehng was reconvened ,, ,,
IMPROVE- A resolution was presented for authorization for the Vdlage to enter ~nto an agreement
MENTS w~th the Vdlage of Arhngton Heights for street hght ~mprovements on Central Read, and
AGRMT on Algonqu~n/Busse/Dempster Reads
Page 4 - March 7, 2000
Trustee Hoefert, seconded b~/Trustee Pr[kke, I, moved for approval of Resolution No
RES 7-OO
NO 7-00
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
, AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE VILLAGE
OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FOR STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfe~, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wllks
Nays None
Mobon carned
AMEND An ordinance was presented for first ~'eadmg, which would amend Chapter 18 of the
CH 18 Wllage Code by proh~b~bng turns and estabhshing weight restrictions on various streets
TURNS & w~th~n the Wllage Staff proposed these amendments as part of the plan for detounng
WEIGHTS traffic wh~le Route 83 is under construction, from April to November, 2000
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to waive the rule requ~nng two
readings of an ordinance
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None
Mobon carned
ORD Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO 5088 No 5088
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XX OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, W~lks
Nays None
Mobon carned
ACQUIRE The following five ordinances were presented for first reading, each of which would
REAL ESTATE authorize the V~Ilage to enter into a purchase contract for property at the rear of 20, 22,
20, 22, 30, 32, 30, 32, and 34 West Busse Avenue Mr Cooney explained that these are commercial
& 34 W properties and the Wllage would purchase the property and s~multaneously grant a
BUSSE AVE parking easement back to each of the property owners The Wllage would then convey
the property to Norwood Budders for the construction of a parking lot
Tom Ne~tzke, 17 S Maple Street, and owner of 22 W Busse Avenue, approached the
Board w~th a number of concerns about the proposed project, including storm water
drainage and secunty Mr Cooney stated that neither the Wllage nor Norwood would
perform any work that would negatively impact any of the properties
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Pnkkel, moved to waive the rule requ~nng two
readings of an ordinance
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None
. ~ , ~ Mobon carried ,~-
~ ORD ' Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO 5089 No 5089
A~ ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE
AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AT
20 WEST BUSSE AVENUE
Page 5 - March 7, 20~0
, '~ , Upon roll cell '~ Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowronl W~lks
Nays None
,- ,~ .. Motion car,~ed" ~ ~,
, - ', - ~ ~, ,Trustee Hoefert, seconded by T,rustee Pnkkel, moved t,o waive the rule reqmnng two
~ - "~ ' ' ~ readings of an ordinance "/ '
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfe, r, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
, ~ , Nays None"
Mobon carried ,
ORD Trustee Hoefed, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO 5090- ~,~' No 5090 "7
i .... ~ ~- ,: d AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PtJRcHASE
(", ' ~' "AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AT
22 WEST BUSSE AVENUE
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, W~lks
Nays None
' ' Motion carried
Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule reqmnng
two readings of an ordinance
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Sko ron, Wllks
Nays None
' ~ '- Mot I *
ORD
NO 5091 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ord,nance
No 5091
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE
b ~ ','~r, AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AT
,.'"; ,~ ~ , ., ~30WESTBUSSEAVENUE '
~ "~ ', ' Upon ,rollcall Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
~,,,,- ,~ ~ , ' 1, '" ~Nays None"
' Mobon carried
~. ~ , ' Trustee W~lks, ~econded by ,T_rustee Skow~'on,*~oved. to waive the rule requlnng two
- read ,ngs of an o d~nance
Upon roll call 'Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None
ORD Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for ,a, pproval of Ordinance
NO 5092 ~' No 5092 i ,, q ~
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE
AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AT
~ ¢~ , ,32 WEST BUSSE AVENUE ,.'
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requ~nng two
readings of an ordinance
Page 6 - March 7, 2000
Ayes Hoefed, Lohrstorfer, Prlkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Upon roll call
Motion carried
ORD ; Trustee Hoe!ert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
No 5093
NO 5093
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE
AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AT
34 WEST BUSSE AVENUE
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prtkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None
Motion carried
STREET NAME An ordinance was presented for first reading, whmh would authorize the renaming of
CHANGE Midway Drive to db Drive
MIDWAY Trustee Wdks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requ~nng two
DRIVE TO readings of an ordinance
DB DR
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, W~lks
~ Nays None
, ' ' Motion carried
ORD , Trustee Wdks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, mov~ed for approval of Ordinance
NO 5094 ~"' No 5O94
AN ORDINANCE RENAMING A STREET IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pr~k~el, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None
' Motion c~rned
Trustee Hoefert left the meebng room at th~s t~me
PUBLIC A request was presented for Vdlage Board al~proval and acceptance of pubhc
IMPROVE- ~mprovements for Steak 'n Shake Restaurant, 201 E Euchd Avenue
MENTS Trustee Wdks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve specific pubhc
STEAK 'N improvements in conjuncbon w~th Steak 'n Shake Restaurant at 201 E Euchd Avenue
SHAKE
Upon roll call Ayes Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowr(~n, Wdks
Nays None
Absent Hoefert
Motion carried
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT '
MANAGER'S Vdlage Manager M~chael Janonis presented b~d results ~
REPORT
The following b~d results were presented for the 2000 Street Resurfaclng Program
BID RESULTS
BIDDER TOTAL BID
STREET Arrow Road Construcbon Co $1,095,660 50'
RESURFAC- Alhed Asphalt Paving Co 1,139,705 76
lNG Johnson Pawng Co 1,401,811 47
Page 7 - March 7, 2000
ARROW TruSte~ Pnkke, ~econded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to concur w~th the
ROAD recommendation of staff to award the 2000 Street Resurfaclng Program contract to Arrow
Road Construcbon Co ~n the amount of $1,095,660 50, and that a change order be
CONST approved whmh reduces the contract by $95,686 16, resulting ~n an adjusted contract
amount of $999,974 34 (Bid tabulation attached to official minutes)
..... Upon roll call Ayes ~ Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
-,- ~ ,Nays ,None ~
Absent Hoefert ~ _ ~
Mobon carned
Trustee Hoefert returned to the m.eetrng . ,,,
The following bid results were presented for sewer p~pe repair at various Iocabons
throughout the Village
SEWER PIPE ~ ' ....- ' ' ~ , ~ '
REPAIR BIDDER TOTAL BID
Suburban General Construcbon *.- $12,895
Martam Construction Co 15,000
V~an Construcbon 45,135 '~'"~ '
SUBURBAN Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to concur w~th the
GENERAL recommendation of staff to award the contract for sewer p~pe repair to Suburban General
CONST Construction for an amount not to exceed $16,000
~ ' ~" Upon r(~ll call Ayes Hoefed, L hrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, W~lks
Nays None
Motion car ed
TREE STUMP T~he followlng b~d results were presented for a parkway tree stump removal contract
REMOVAL
PRICE PER DIAMETER INCH
BIDDER 0-_2_4" 25"+
Kramer Tree Specialists, Inc., $ 7 00 ,~ $ 7 50
B Haney and Sons, lnc 12 50 12 50
.,~ McG~nty Bros, Inc , ~,,,, 12 75 16 00
Trustee Wdks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur w~th the recommendabon
KRAMER of staff to award a contract to Kramer~Tree Spec~ahsts, Inc m an amount not to exceed
TREE ~ ' $28 00o 00
SPECIALISTS
Upon rollcall Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wdks
'~ Nays None
Motloncarned , ~ ~ ,, ~
VIDEO A request was presented for approval of a b~d waiver for a~dlgltal video production
package Ross Rowe, Cable Produchon Coordinator, explained that Sw~dersk~
EQUIPMENT Electronics of Itasca, Ilhno~s is the only dealer in th~s area who has the needed upgrade,
the Tnmty L~va D~g~tal Production System Add~bonally, Sw~dersk~ has serviced the
V~llage ~n the past, therefore It was staff's recommendabon to waive the b~d process and
~ . gra,nt the contract to Sw~dersk~ Electromcs for the Tnn~ty System
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur with the
SWIDERSKI recommendabon of staff to award the contract to Swlderskl Electronics for the purchase
of the Tnmty L~ve Dig~tal Production System for an amount not to exceed $20,230 00
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, Skowron, Wdks
Nays None
Mobon carried
Page 8 - March 7, 2000
FIRE DEPT A request was presented for the Board's a~p~roval to waive the b~d process for the
UNIFORMS purchase of fire department umforms, and to enter a contract with Kale Umform
Company It was stressed that the V~llage has a sabsfactory h~story of working w~th Kale
and past service received from R&R Un~form Company was unsatisfactory
KALE Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur w~th the
recommendabon of staff to award a contract for the purchase of fire department un~forms
UNIFORM CO to Kale Umform Company. ~n an amount not to exceed the 1999 pnces, in 1999, the fire
department purchased uniforms totaling $12.898 15
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert. Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel. Skowron, W~lks
Nays None
Motion carried
STREETLIGHT A request was presented for acceptance of a proposal from C~orba Group, Inc
IMPROVE- for Phase I and Phase II eng~neenng for the Central Road streetl~ghts and the
Algonqu~n/Busse/Dempster streethght street hght design services, w~th an amount not to
MENTS exceed $65,362
Trustee Pr~kkel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve a proposal from
ClORBA C~orba Group, Inc for Phase I and Phase II engineering for the Central Road streetl~ghts
GROUP and the AJgonqu~n/Busse/Dempster streethght street I~ght design services, w~th an
amount not to exceed $65,362
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pr[kkel, Skowron, W~lks
Nays None
Mobon carried
Mr Janonis presented a request for approval of the final payment for Wolf Road
WOLF ROAD ~mprovements, which were completed by the IIl~no~s Department of Transportabon ~n
IMPROVE- 1992 He explained that the final b~ll~ng was delayed due to the I~tigabon concerning the
MENTS. FINAL contractor, Palumbo
PAYMENT
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the final payment to
IDIOT for 1992 Wolf Road ~mprovements, ~n the amount of $14,322 89
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pr~kkel, Skowron, W~lks
Nays None
Mobon carrted
A request was presented for approval of a contract amendment to S D I Consultants,
STREET- Ltd, to ~nclude the railroad depot in the Stage II Downtown Streetscape Program, which
SCAPE would increase the contract amount to $29.454
PROGRAM,
TRAIN Trustee W~lks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve a contract
STATION amendment w~th S D I Consultants, Ltd for the Downtown Streetscape Program.
~ncreas~ng the contract by an amount not to exceed $29,454
SDI
Upon roll call Ayes Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel, $kowron, W~lks
Nays None
Motion carried
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
OTHER Mr Janon~s reminded the audience that Coffee w~th the Council was scheduled for
BUSINESS Saturday. March 11
Page 9 - March 7, 2000
CLOSED . CLOSED SESSION
SESSION ~ Mayor Farley stated that there was no need for a Closed Session, listed on the agenda
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10 44 p rn
Vdlage Clerk '
Page 10 - March 7, 2000
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
16-Mar-00
Cash & Invstmt Receipts D~sbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 03101100 Per Attached Credltsl Balance
03/01/00 03/16/00 List of Bills Deb~ts 03/16/00
General Fund 6,304,873 2,659,142 505,806 8,458,209
Special Revenue Funds
Refuse D~sposal Fund 1,143,576 505,672 113,807 1,535,441
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 790,326 123,163 19,787 893,702
Commumty Development S]k Grant Fund 48,572 201 48,371
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 11,609 11,609
Debt Service Funds 2,939,356 604,785 3,544,141
C_ ap~tal PrQjects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 2,161,043 ~ 1,040 2,160,003
Pohce & F~ra Building Construction Fund 53,178 53,178
Capital Improvement Construcbon Fund 179,056 179,056
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 534,399 18,121 50,014 502,506
Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,003,138 134,509 4,137,647
1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,633 4,633
Flood Control Construction Fund 853,077 139,906 400 992,583
EnterDr~se Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 2,649,910 510,623 238,188 2,922,345
Parking System Revenue Fund 690,945 7,684 944 697,685
Internal Serwce Funds
Veh=cle Maintenance Fund 166,371 15,456 150,915
Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,028,833 5,028,833
Computer Replacement Fund 245,510 17,752 227,758
R~sk Management Fund 3,285,300 43,264 278,305 3,050,259
Trust & Aae~lcy Funds
Pohce Pension Fund 30,640,875 133,494 30,774,369
F~re Pension Fund 31,779,602 128,021 31,907,623
Flexcomp Trust Fund 20,735 8,725 27,092 2,368
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,412,649 63,860 48,554 1,427,955
Benefit Trust Funds 105,136 105,136
$95,052,702 5,080,969 1,317,346 98,816,325
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN T]{URSDAY MA~i600 14 28 PAGE 1
RELEASE I0
VtLRAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC~
LIST OF EILLS PRESenTED TO TEE 00~ OP TROSTEES FROM X'.gACH 01 2000 TO MARCH 16 2000
DEPT RENDOR RER VENDOR NM INVOICE DESCRIPTION k~OUNT
NON-DEPANTMF~A~
02513 A~E~ETHY, JANET T. ~LEX C(~P-~%RCH 59 17
~L~X C(~P-MARCH 276 13
335 30
02941 AC~, D~IEL R ~ C~P-~ 136 08
01042 ~CZYK, TED D ~ C~P-~CH 293 99
01867 ~DLER, GLEN a ~-C~P 3541 00
04717 ~, TH~ & C~S ~E T~S~R T~ ~BATE 726 00
02667 BE~, DAVID ~ C~P-~RCH 2359 00
04739 BENEDI~, GEN~I~ O ~D 36 00
02921 BLUE, MIC~L ~ C~P-~CH 95 00
~ C~P-~CH 416 68
5~1 68
04741 B~GY, ROBERT ~DICAPPED/~ND 36 00
02948 BRIER, I~A ~ C~P-~RCH 500 16
~2949 BROUSS~U, ~D~W J ~ C~P-~CH 1857 43
04672 BRa, $T~ 5~ C~P-~CH 398 50
03756 B~DICK, ~DY B ~ C~P-~ 63 00
03760 BU~S, PA~ 5~ C~P-~CH 437 22
~1102 CITIB~, N A ~ ~NS C~S-G~ 20282 47
~ INS C~S-G~ 12095.21
32377.68
01118 CLE~ OF THE CIR~PT COURT PAYROLL ~R ' 030900 700 00
PAYROLL ~R ' 030900 190 00
0~759 D~ ~ ~D-99~5~ 5935 O0
01241 ~WS~, H~Y C ~ C~P-~CH 68 00
047~0 DI~E~CH~ GAIL ~D-C~T S~ T~E 100 00
01327 EIS~N, B~Y ~ C~P-~CH 908 00
REPORT APEOARD~PT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN TRURSDAY BARi600 14 28 PAGE 2
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOONT PROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS P~SEN?ED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ i'~RCE 01 2000 TO ~RCE 26 2000
DER VENDOR EBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AI'IOUNT '
................................................................................................................................
00102 FIi~ PENSION ~ND PAYROLL DR - 030900 12102 19
01405 FIRST CC~ONWL~LTH ~PLOYEE DE~AL PI~ 2814 08
00121 FIRST NATIONAL BA~N OF CHICAGO SAVINGS BONDS-UR 3/9/00 550 00
04190 PRITZ, RS~ETR R ~/C(~P4~RCH 104 00
04733 GE~UHTY, D~A~E & R~IEL REAL ~STATB T~ ~TE 900 O0
H7~7 GE~SB~R~ DB~DO~ ~U~LIC WO~ ~SC~ 130 00
01~84 GIRS~, ~OBERT J ~ C~-~ 71 60
01536 G~S, JOHN ~ C~P-~C~ 3420 00
01557 ~, LESTER A ~ C~-~CH 914 49
04761 ~E~INSKI ~ SON INC BOND ~D 50 00
04728 ~OSKI~DO~, T~ ~ C~P-~RS~ 177 54
04731 HgNT, ~F~RY ~ C~P-~CH 446 O0
00106 IC~ ~TI~ TRUST - 401 PAYROLL DR ' 030900 316 93
00107 I~ ~TI~ TRUST - 457 PAYROLL ~R - 030900 14867 11
~0108 ILLINOIS DEP~E~ OF ~VE~E PAYROLL FOR - ~30900 16429 90
01044 ILLINOIS STATE DISBU~ ~IT PAYROLL DR - 030900 300 00
PAYROLL ~R - 030900 14 63
PAYROLL ~R - 030900 519 23
PAYROLL FOR - 030900 195.50
~AYROLL FOR - 030900 192.29
PAYROLL ~R - 030900 126 00
PA~OLL DR - 030900 60 00
1407 65
04729 IPSEN, B~ 5~ C~P-~RCH 300 00
00352 Ja~, SERRIO ~D RS/~D T~ 99 10 36
00358 ~ISER, ~P~ M ~D SS~D T~ 99 3.74
01794 ~LE ~ID~S, INC CL~HIN~ SUPLIES 157 ~0
~1844 ~UPA, ~ M ~ C~P-~CH 53.00
01852 ~E, ~ L 5~ C~-~ ~9 52
~1884 LEE, ~ETH R ~ ~-~CH 2726 00
01905 ~, ~ ~ ~ C~-~ 80 08
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERATED S NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 20 PAGE 3
RELEASE ID .
VlLLAEE OF MOUN~ PROSPECT ....
LIST OF DILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~C~ ~RCH 01 2000 TO MARCH 16 2000
DER VENDOR ER VENDOR Nk~E I INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01942 MALCOLM, JOHN J FLEX C~P-MARUN 234 00
00116 I{ETRO ~DERAL CREDIT ~NIUN PAYROLL FOR - 030900 250 00
00117 I.~'TEXPOLITA~ ALLIANCE - ~OLICE 'PAYROLL FOR - 030900 546.00
02017 MIDDLETUN, JOAN !FLEX C~P-MA~CU 20{ 92
02033 MILLER, DAVID L F~EX C~P-}~%RUN 230 93
02034 MILLER, JAMES ~EX CC~P-~ARCH 142.00
02072 MOUNT PROSPECT PUELIC LIBRARY PRET 2ND ALLOCATION 2660 20
04755 ~T PROSPECT CLDOKTOWER VENTURD SERVICE 9800 00
04725 NEUNURER, MIC~REL ~FUND ES/RD TAX 99 326 51
04737 OPERE, GEORGE C~GED TO }t~DICAP 36 00
04742 PACDOLCZAK R~FUND 24 00
04736 PACKARD, RODRET G RE,ND 87 2I
~ND 9 18
~E~ND 10 35
106 74
00123 PEBSCO PAYROLL FOR - 030900 16550 37
04722 PIERCE CONSTRUCTION RDO~D BOND-98-1684 50 00
00124 POLICE PENSION FOND PAYROLL FOR - 030900 14871 46
04673 DA~ DEREARDINO COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PA~F.NTS PAYROLL FOR - 030900 211 85
02508 DCRDLTZ, WA~TER A F~EX C~P-MAXC~ 270 90
02514 DCEXANDT, ~ ~FOND SS/WED TAX 99 44 67
00125 DEIU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 030900 513 50
02529 DEXAR HO~E BUILDERS PARKWAY SODDING 700 00
02530 SS~KIU, MICRAEL J. FLEX CC~P-M.~.RCN 207 00
04160 SKINDINGSEXDE SCOTT FLEX C~P-MA~UN 7 00
04757 DT~.K N DEAXE, INC EOND ~FEXD 12472 D0
00038 KEPRENSUN, MICRAEL ~UND DS/BED TAX 99 40 75
02631 DTEXEREDON, MICEAEL R FLEX C~P-MARCH 272 25
02669 SWEET, ALICE N UA~DICAP STICKER 12 00
04735 SWEGLER, JEFFREY ~FOND 29 07
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 88 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 4
RELEASE ID
VIL~GE OF HO~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD BE TRUSTEES FRC~ MARCN 01 2000 TO MARCN 16 2000
DE~T VENDOR N~E ~ENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DENCRt~TION A~OUN~
REFONE 3 06
32 13
02689 TRIRDDISTRICTCIRCNIT COURT BOND MONEY 3250 00
MAR1 BOND MONEY 1209 00
BOND MONEY 950 00
BOND MONEY 2800 00
BOND MONEY 275 00
8500 O0
04726 TOPALIS, THC~AS NENIORRATE 24 00
02710 TRACY, RICHARD L FLEX C(kMP-MARCH 853 74
02729 TRUTY, CHRIS J FLEX C~P-MARCN 224 B0
02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE BY PHONE 3000 00
00127 UNITED WAY PAYROLL FOR - 030900 383 38
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR- 030900 17469 80
DISBUNSENENTS 7300 00
DISBURSEMENTS 250 00
25019 80
04314 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 030900 138896 57
PAYROLL FOR - 030900 19622 37
PAYROLL FOR - 030900 13179 21
167658 15
02814 VILLAREAL, JOEL REFOND $S/MED TAX 99 112 13
02828 WAGNER, JOHN R FLEX C~P-MARCH 62 73
02853 WRUNERITCH, RANDAAL C FLEX CCMP-MARCH 093 82
02881 MILSON, WRVIN B, FLEX CCMP-MARCH 375 00
FELX CCMP'MARCN 37 94
412 94
04727 WRIGHT, MICHAEL B OVE~AYNENT 50 00
04730 ~SONAL, DAVID FLEX CC~P-MARCE 6D 85
TO~AL ' 378210 35
PI]BLIC REPEXSENTATION
02270 AT&T SERVICE 1/18-2/21 3 38
04753 DES FLRIWRS MINISTERIAL ASSOC TICK5~S FOR BREAKFAST 30 00
01377 NEDERAL EXPENSE CORP AIRBI~ 18 §4
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 ~ ~UN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 0
NTLLAGE OF ~OU~ PROSPECT ~ ~
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ MERCE 01 2000 TO MARCH 16 2000
DENT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02101 NORTE~RETREN ILLINOIS ELNG CC~ CONTRIBNTION-2000 {000 00
02241 ONE STOP TELEC(I~4UNICATIONS ~EB-$ERVICE 33 09
02301 RETTY CASE - FINANCE DEPT. MIRE EXP~NSES 42.73
MI$C EXPENSES 55 57
MISC REPEWSES 100 00
198 30
02779 V I P AWARDS i ENGRAVING PLAQUE Z~GRAVING 19 90
TO?AL ' 4303 21
VILLAGE MEi~ASER'S OPPICE
02270 AT&? SERVICE 1/19-2/21 11 20
01062 CERTIFIED REPORTING CCSPANV COURT REPORTER 180.00
0108{ CHICAGO TRIBUNE AD N10 00
01469 GATEWAY CC~RANIRS INC LA~TOP 2836 U0
01609 HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER PRE-LXPIDY~NT PHYSICALS 159 00
04748 I(3~A PUBLICATION 94 50
EOOK-I(~ 54 50
149 U0
00353 JANORIS, MICHAEL E LEWcE/MEETING 48.25
02139 NATIONWIDE PAPERS NEWSLETTER 3293 45
020{1 ONE STOP TELEC~4NWICATIONS FEE-SERVICE 110 30
02285 PEDEREEN & HOONT tEC~L FEES-NEOBAUER 556 30
02301 PETTY CASE - FINANCE DENT ~ISC ~XPEWCES 26 62
MISC REPEWSE$ 22 61
02021 VON ERIESEW, PONTELL&ROPER, S.C. REf~ REES 1998.65
TO?A~ : 10801 46
TV SERVICES DIVISION
U22T0 AT&T SERVICE 1/19'2/21 22 56
04720 IBIZ TECNWOLOGY CORP. MINI EEYBOA~D 159 58
04014 MAILBOXES ETC SHIP CRES-UPS 80 06
019§7 MARNWRTNW VIDEO SUPPLY SUPPLIES 414 86
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 20 PAGE 6
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES F~ON MARCH 01 2000 TO MARCH 16 2000
..................................................................................................................................
DEFT VENDOR NRK RENDON EANE INVOICE DESCEIFTIOM AROUNT
# .................................................................................................................................
02241 ONE STOP TELECO~UNICNTIORS REB-RERVIRK 220 59
02315 PIONEER PRESS TIMES $~SCRIPTION 27 95
02719 TREETOP PRONOTIONS, INC. GIFT CERTIFICATES 181 04
02722 TPJ STATE ELECTRONIC CORP VIDEO/FTS/CANLE 37 34
02800 VIDEO IMAGES, INC REPLACEMENT P~FE 06 00
T~AL 1230 58
NTLL%GE CLERK'S OFFICE
01518 K~BRSSADOR OFFICE EQUIP , ANC SAINT CONTRACT 1200 00
04724 APdA CHICAGO AEMA-SRKINAN 3/22 95 00
02270 AT&T SERVICE 1/19-2/21 11 28
03940 MORA~{ STk~P CO , INC DESK ~OSSER 70 00
02238 ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY 32 25
02241 ONE STOP TELEC~NICATIORS FEB-SERVICE 110 30
T~AL 1518 03
roMANCE DEPARTMENT
01518 ARBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP , INC SAINT CONTRACT 1200 00
02138 ~ON SYSTEMS CORPORATION COLLECTION SERVICES 20 00
02270 AT&T SERVICE I/X0-2/21 42 87
04543 CORPORATE EMPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 119 90
OFFICE SUPPLIES 131 86
251 76
04666 ELRE~RTH, DO~Gk%~ REI~ TRARKL DEPOSIT 150 00
01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORE SERVICE 42 99
04710 LASALLE BANK QUARTERLY FEES 897 99
02148 NEOPOST INK CARTRIDGE RED 45.59
02241 ONE STOP TELECC~94~NICATIONS FEB-RKRVICE 419 12
02301 DNTTY CASE - FINANCE DEFT. MISC EXPENSES 6 06
MISC EMPRKRKS 18 41
24.47
04157 DLIKRS, VICEM SERVICES 50 00
02639 NTIVERE TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICE 2/14-2/18 512 74
REPORT APBOARDRET GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 "~'RUN T~UREDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE
RELEASE ID
VILSAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS P~ESSNTED TO TNE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~RC~ ~RCN 0I 2000 TO MA~CE 16 2000
DEF~ VT~[~R i~BR VEN[DR EA~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~O~NT
DATA E~RY SERVICES 627 15
1139 89
02672 SYST~8
T~ 4427.31
C~ITY DE~P~
04546 ~PINE C~E~ CO ~E~ ~SH 69 95
02270 AT&T SEUICE 1/19-2/21 ll 28
$EUICE 1/19-2/21 16 92
SEUICE 1/19-2/21 29 33
SEUICE 1/19-2/21 9 02
SEUICE 1/19-2/21 9 02
01222 DAILY ~E~D SUBSCRIPRION 228 80
04743 DE~ OF PRO~SSIONAL ~GU~TION ~N~A5 N~ICE 220 00
~N~AL 220
01377 ~DE~ ~P~SS CORP AI~ILA 16 13
~ 04675 I ~ I A ~ DUES 30 00
01783 J~ & TOPICS ~WSPAPE~ ~W~
01979 MCI ~LESS J~ SERVICE 55 46
J~ SERVICE 137 62
J~ SEUICE 65 63
258
02241 O~ STOP T~I~TI~S ~B-SERVICE 110 30
FEB-SEUICE 165.44
~B-SERVICE 286 77
~B-SERVICE 88 24
~B-SEUICE 88 24
738 99
02301 RElY ~H - ~N~CE DE~ MISC ~PENSES 30 07
70 27
02342 P~ISION SYST~ C~CE~S,INC ELD PE~IT PRG 550 00
02378 ~ICK P~ PLUS, INC ~ RILL GEORGE 43 20
02691 TH~S~ E~TOR INSPE~I~S ~INSPE~ION 93 O0
REPORT APBOANDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 8
RELFASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE NOA~ OF TRUSTEES FE~ MARCH 01 2000 TO MARCH 16 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR }lANE INVOICE DESCRI~DON ~DONT
02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUFE 58 94
TOTAL 2698 56
D(I'f{3NITY DEVELOFEENT -
01377 ~DERAL EXPRESS CORP AIRBILL 14 33
AIRBILL 14.33
28.66
02052 MORAN, MICHAEL J PROFESSIONAL SERVICRS 172 50
TOTAL ' 201 16
~ SER~ICRS
02919 303 ~ ASS~IATION, INC SENIOR TAXI RIDES 374 10
01561 AI~ERICAN CHARGE SERVICE SENIOR TAXI RIDES 348 30
03327 ANDERSON, PETER TAI-CHI CLASSES 290 00
01994 ARAMA~ RBFRi!SIiMEH SEUICES COFFEE 176 60
04745 ASSOCIATION OF ILL SENIOR CEHERS MREBERSEIP DUES 75 00
02270 AT&T SREVICE 1/19'2/21 40 61
01056 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY RBFRBS~EKTS 148 40
01279 DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 110 60
01811 KEEFER'S PHAI1MACY MEDICAL SUPPLIES 45.75
01979 MCI WIRELESS SENVICE 46 77
04539 ~RSING 2000 RENE!%t5 27 95
02241 O~ STOP TELECO~tiI~IICATIONS FEB-SERVICE 397.06
TOTAL : 2073 14
~LICE
01575 ENTNEXCH PH D ,LARRY CONSULTATION FEE 450 00
02270 AT&T SERVICE 1/19-2/21 228 99
01049 CDW GOVEP~Ng~NT, INC C~PNTER SUPPLIES 41 49
04756 CHI~GO DEFENDER POLICE OFFICER ABVERTIShv]/~T 81 97
04762 CNT~O STATE ~IVZRSITY ~ISTRB-M MC~FFIN 550.00
01084 CHICA~ TRIBUNE AD 1020 00
01008 CHIEF SUPPLY F3I/{ 49 80
SUPPLIES 64 55
SUPPLIES 18 53
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF PILLS PRESLNTHD TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ ~[AMCH 01 2000 TO ~CN 16 2000
DP~T ~NDOR PBR ~NOOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
129 88
01222 DALLY HEEA~D AD 224 25
04732 DBT ONLINE, INC SERVICES 150 00
01350 ENDEAVOR PLUS ~EDICAL ~ 403 00
01366 EXPEREAM SERVICE 33 00
01469 GATE~AY COMPANIES INC C~P]TERE/PENTI~ 7220 00
04721 I-PAC COALITION DUES 100 00
00106 IC~A ~TIREHENT TRUST - 401 IC~A 401-PADLOCK 425 63
01740 INTERNATIONAL ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE ANNUAL ME~REREHIP 50 00
01739 I~OX~ETERE, INC MO~PPICE NOR ALCO SENSOR 171 00
A~CO-$ENSOR IV/F~SE 693 00
864
81794 KA~E ~NIFO~,~S, INC POLICE PATCHES 714 96
04744 ~AW EN~ORC~NT LEGAL ~NVIEW SURECRI~TION 98 00
01901 LITTLE AMEriCA PRISONER ~OOD 187 40
01922 LYNN PEA~Y C~PAMY RVIDENCP SUPPLIES 21 90
02155 NEXTEL C~'~NICATIONS CELLULA~ SERVICE 286 16
02183 NORTHERN ILLINOIS POLICE CRIF~E ML'{BER~REP ASSESSMENT 52444 00
02189 NORTHWEST CF/{TRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES-APREL 26615 60
02241 ONE STOP TELECC~{UNICATIONS ~EB-SERVICH 411 17
~EB-SERVICE 2239 00
2650 17
02259 PAGENET PAGER SERV 27 06
00409 PAVL~K, NONALD W R~IM~ EXPENSES 71.90
02304 PETTY ~ASH - POLICE DEF~ MIHC EXPL'{SRE 229 07
MISC EXPENSF.~ 34.30
MISC.EXPENS~ 75 40
MISC EXPAMSRE 4 06
MISC EXPENSES 6 00
340 83
02323 POLICE E~NO. RESEARCH NORU}~ GRNERA~ ME~{~SREHIP DUES 300.00
REPORT APHOARDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 10
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRERENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNUN ~RCH 01 2000 TO BRCH 16 2000
DR~T VEMDGR REM RENEOR NANH INVOICE DESCRIFIION
.................................................................................................................................
04300 PUBLIC AGEECY TRAINING COUNCIL REGISTER-J SCEMITZ 200 00
02392 RAUS, FRANK REII{B ~PUNSHS 30 00
02396 RAYMANK OFFICE PROD ~ FU~ ONE ATTACHE 149 95
00414 PJCHANDSON, RUNALD REIM~URSSMENT 70 00
02495 RAYERE CUNPUTEM SOURCE TONER CARTRIDGES 519 50
02550 SIREHIE FINGER PRINT I~BORATOR EVIDENCE SUPPLIES 71 73
02563 REILLPATH SEMINARS REGISTEM-KOTLARE 149 00
04155 SPANISH ARERICAN LANGUAGE POLICE OFFICER AD 898 00
04139 STANAND & ASSOCIATES PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING 700 00
02680 TELETRAC, INC SERVICE 1092 00
02698 TJ CONEVERA'S, IRC A~R4UNITIUN 3731 00
02722 TRI-STATE ELECTRONIC CORE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 18 01
02723 TRITON ELECTRONICS, IRC ~DIO REPAIRS 253 00
02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT OFFICE SUPPLIES 64 30
OFFICE SUPPLIES 308 77
363 07
02893 WOLF CAMERA, IRC PHOTO PROCESSING 17 70
PHOTO PROCESSING 45 83
PHOTO PROCESSING 29 04
PHOTO PROCESSING 102 78
195 00
02912 REP MANUFACTURING CUNPANY SANI'~IZHR 68 36
TOTAL ' 104024 46
FIRE
01227 AIR ONE EQUIEMEMT, INC PUMP 372 00
01246 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL CYLINDER RENTAL 89 00
04738 A~L EQNTP~ZNT SERVICE, INC. ROTARY SWITCH 23 25
00367 ANDERSON, DUNALD M E~(PEMSHS 504 00
02270 AT~:T SERVICE 1/19-2/21 224 48
01006 BUSSR CAN WASH, INC CAR WASH 10 80
01077 CHICAGO CC~R{ SERVICE, INC RADIO REPAIR 448 $0
REPORT APBOANDRPT GENERATED § NOV 99 10 58 < RUN THURSDAY MARI600 14 28 PAGE 11
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~
LIST OF BILL~ PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MARCH 01 2000 TO ~ANCH 16 2000
ONPT VENDOR NRA VENDOR NAN~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION
01097 CINTRE GONP UNIFOHN REPEESN 24
CLF~ING SERVICES 79 20
103 20
00315 DAWSON, NENRY EXPHNCHS 33 00
00310 DOUBHN, RIC~U~RD EXPENSES 33 00
01328 EL-COR INDUSTRIES, INC MINC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 465 57
01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CONP FED EX 11 76
01412 F~HNT SAFETY SUPPLY LIGNT FIXTNHN 135 54
01469 GATEWAY COMPANIES ENC ~APTON 2761 00
01502 GLOBAL FIRE EQOIP~NT, ENC ADAPTEN STREIGNT ~ NWI 145 91
02107 EXIGNTS AUTOMOTIVE HISC.~PAIR PARTS 497 13
01619 HOUSTON ASSOCIATES NHW MIRE TESTING 1435 00
04734 HN DIRECT SUPPLIES 95 00
01677 ILLINOIS ENERGENCY SERVICES MGNT AENM F~P~EESHIP/INS 205 00
01703 ILLINOIS PROFESSIONA~ FIREFIGNTENS ASSOC 2000 ~AGES&WORK COMD NUR 20 00
01794 KALE OMIFO~S, INC VARIOUS UNIFOHN ITENS 1289 24
04754 KINKO'E SUPPLIES 89 70
01870 ~ATTOF CENVHNLET, INC SAFETY LANE 10 00
04752 }{AGUIEN ENTERPRISES INC. PATCH FAK 247 00
01041 MALCOLM, JOHN E:<PENSES 502 43
01979 MCI ~IRELESS SERVICE-dAN 114 38
02187 NORTHWEST ASSOC OF PROVIDER I~'IMRERSHIP/HNS COOR 50 00
02189 iqORTHWENT CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES-APRIL 6653 90
02190 NOMTHHNST CC~R4HNITY ENS DENT RELEASE FORMS 125 00
02241 ONE STOP TELNCC{~4OMICATIONS FEB-SERVICE 408 35
FEB-SERVICE 219{ 89
.... '4.--.
2603 24
02306 RAYMARK OFFICE PROD & FOAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 341 20
02408 REID AND ASSOCIATES, JOHN E NHN HIRE-SERVICE 175 00
02483 SAFE-LITE NYSTHNS LTD ){DONT DOOR LITE 546.60
REPORT APBOARDRET GENERATED 5 HOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 12
RELRASE ID
VILLAGE OF MO~T PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~RC8 ~RCH 0l 2000 TO ~RCH 16 2000
DEP~ VENDOR NBR VL~DOH Nk~ INVOICE DRSCREPTION ANOUNT
02525 EXCKETA~Y OF STATE LICENSE PLATE STICKER 95 00
04723 SIUC TUITION/~{~iCOLM 300 00
04595 TALLGRASS SYSTKES LTD POWER ADAPTERS 213 00
02684 TERRACE SUPPLY CI~iP~Y SUPPLIES 55 51
00450 VALENTINE, R PAUL EXPENSES 33 00
01228 W S DARZEY & CO BUNKER SOOTS 189 08
02832 WAZ-}{ART STORES, INC FILM SUPPLIES 86 39
02884 WIRFS INDUSTRIES, INC REPAIWE 432 00
TOTAL 21772 09
PUBLIC WORKS - A~ININTR
02270 AT&T SERVICE 1/19-2/21 144 39
01003 CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO SKEV-2/2/00-3/1/00 91 16
00337 FOWZE, ~AURA CLOTHING ALLOW~CE 200 00
02155 NEXTEL CC~iUNICATIORS SERVICE 673 40
02241 ONE STOP TELECO~96]NICATIONS BE-SERVICE ' 1411 78
02305 PETTY CAEN - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL 46 35
T~VEL & SUPPLIES 3 00
40 35
02536 SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC SUPPLIES 465 60
OPEN HOUSE GIV~-AWAYS 1048 75
1514 35
TOTAL ' 4084 51
PUNLIC WORI<S - STREETE/B
04749 kwERE TWEP LTD PORTABLE AC UNIT 2695 00
01830 ANDEWEON ELEVATOR CO ~II{T ELEVATOR 155 95
01840 ANDERSON PEST CONTROL SERVICE 132 $0
02435 BADE PAPER PRODUOTS INS CALCIILI CHLORIDE 1728 00
04700 E~TTIE, ~iARCY REBATH-LSQ SIDEWALK 175.00
02788 BEST ~ALITY CLEANING, INC CUSTODIAL SERVICES 7027 00
04719 BOKE~ ACE BAIU)WARE WERE SCREENS 113 39
REPORT APBOARONPT GVEEKATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 13
RELEASE ID .
VILL%GE ON MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRF-~VETRD TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES EEOW MARCN Ol 2000 TO MARC]{ 16 2000
DE~T ~NONR NVE VENDOR NA~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION k~OD~
02942 BREVEAN, MIVE SNOW PLOW SERVICE 168 O0
01034 CARGILL VEC -SALT DIVISION SALT DELIVERED 9242 98
ROAD SALT 9743 72
ROAD SALT 592 65
19579 35
01055 CEETRAL ACO{~STICAL SUPPLY DREWALLING SUPPLIES 371 32
01069 CRAM RITE PRODUCTS COWPANY CLU~ING SUPPLIES 54 51
CLEANING SUPPLIES 54 53
CL5%NING SUPPLIES 180 43
CLFANING SUPPLIES 54 51
CLEANING SUPPLIES 54 51
CLEANING SUPPLIES 54 51
CLEVEING SUPPLIES 184 94
637 92
04750 CROTON PRODUCTS CEILING TARP 68 25
CEILING TARP 68 25
136 50
81253 DES PLAINES G~ASS COWPA~Y REELACE GLASS-DESK TOP 455 00
01287 DOOR EVSTAMS, PNC SERV-INV436353 153 16
/ SENV-INV435738 152.63
EERV-INV434807 157.90
463 69
81291 DOVER ELEVATOR COWPANY ELEVATOR MAINT 190 57
01307 DRUGER, ~EE REOW PLOW SERVICE 112 80
04763 REL~MER, WILLIAM REBATE 5SQ SIDEWALK 175 00
04629 INDUST~,IA~ STEEL EEVE. CTR PA~TS 651 38
00384 LUTERE, DONNA SNOW PLOW SERVICE 143 50
01996 RE/{C(i~9~BE fabLES 232 00
02014 ~ID-ANERI~ TR. & EQUIP EO.INC REREI~ 989 58
PA~TS 1187 64
2177 22
02129 NATIOWAL ~{~AT AND POWER CO~OR INV3196/3380/2168/2161/2593 2225 64
02221 O'NEAL, REVIN SNOW PLOW EEVEICE 175 00
02417 RENTORIL - S~B~REAN ~AEEEALY ~AINT. 1274 85
02542 SVEPP PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL REEV 885 08
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERETED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 I4 28 PAGE I4
REL~RE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~ROM RARCH 0I 2000 TO RARCN 16 2000
DE~T VENDOR NBR VONDOR MANE INVOICE D~CRIPTION AMOUNT
02549 SIGNS AND BI,UBS, INC SIGN BLANKS 21t5 00
02754 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD I~D LRESE FEN 943 90
04301 W~ON, JOHN SNOW PLOW SERVICE 157 50
TOTA~ . 45297 18
PUBLIC ~ORKS - ~ORESTRY/
01555 HANEY AND SONS, B INC TREE RUBOVAL 24654 24
02100 ~SRER FORESTS INC SEEDLINGS 174 00
02110 RATIUBA~ AREORIUT ASSM TREE BOOKLETS 21 50
~ TO?AL 24849 74
REBLIC [4ONRE - EMGINRERI
01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC ~INTENANCE CUBIRACT 800 00
01147 CC~ONWWALTN EDISON STREET LIGHT-I/00 9956 54
02371 ENVIRONI{ENTAL SCIENCE & ENG INC ENG SERVICES 774 32
01946 RARAGE~ENT CONCEPTS SERVICE 3829 00
TOTAL . 15359 86
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEW
01700 AMERITECH SERVICE FEB 23 21
SERVICE FEB 23 61
46 82
02270 AT&? SERVICE 1/19-2/21 301 19
02370 AMA REGIS?ER-SEAM RORSEY 450 00
02938 BO{~Ii]~q DISTRIBUTION CENTER PARTS 04 00
01049 CDM GOVENUBENT, INC PARTS 57 45
01053 ONLLUIJ~R OMB - CHICAGO SERV-2/2/00-3/1/00 9I 17
01528 GREAT LARES FIRE EQUIP~UT FIRE HOSE 165 00
01844 HBK WATER METER SERVICE LABOR/MATLS 3343 00
0142'; dOSE?H D FORE}O~I & CO ?OO~/PANTS 478 93
01974 MATCO TOOLS RECHAROREBLE BATTERY 140 90
02024 HID~ST MOLE, INC REPAIRS 9985 00
02241 ONE STOP ?ELECC~4~iUNICATIONS FF2~-RERVICE 1634 28
REB-RERVICE 2944 90
REPORT APBOARERPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 I5 58 RUN THURSDAY HAR1600 14 28 PAGE 15
RELEASE SD
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ' ~,
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUB MARCH Ol 2000 TO HARCH 16 2000
REPT VENDOR NBR VEUDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION
4579 18
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC NORES THAVEL { SUPPLIES 8 98
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 87,97
106 95
02536 SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC SUPPLIES 465 60
OPEN HOORE GIVE-AHAYS 1048 75
1514 35
02773 O S BANE TRUST MATER 106605 00
POWER 6553 00
O&M 9385 00
FIXED 92840 00
210388 00
02914 EIERELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS REPAIR CIA~P 1315 20
TOTAL ' 238048 64
PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DI
01639 ARERICAR NATIORA5 BREI{ TIPPING FEES 71434 00
FIXED COSTS 42324 65
113758 65
02270 AT&T SERVICE 1/19-2/21 4 52
02241 ONE STOP TELECC~fdRICATIONS FEB-RERVIUB 44 12
tOTAL 113807 29
PUBLIC WORKS - VEHIClZ M
01169 AERIAL EQUIPMENT, I~qC CHAIN SAW REPAIR 103 61
CHAIN SAV; REPAIR 117.79
221 40
01187 AETNA TRUCE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 316 88
04642 RINTUBCU PAGING PAGINU SERVICE 44 87
01937 ANTIOCH TIRE, INC TIRE REPAIR 41 00
02270 AT&T SERVICE 1/19-2/21 16 92
02938 BO~ DISTRIBUTION CENTER PARTS 523 70
01006 BUSSE CAR {~REHI IRC FEB-CAR WASHES 1004 78
01045 CATCHING FLUIDPO~ER PARTS 1628 33
01236 DAVE & ,]I~'S AOTO BODY, ENC SERVICE 52.50
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 16
RELEASE ID
VILIAGE OF MOUNT P~OSEECT
LIST OF BILLS P~SENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRE~ XARCE 01 2000 TO MANCH 16 2000
DEPT ~DOR NBR VENDOR ~ I~OICS DESCRIPTION AROUNT
.................................................................................................................................
SERVICE 128 60
175 00
04751 DUPAEE RELDING INC REPAIRS/LINCOLN ~ADER 23500
03958 ~END INTE~A?IEN~ PARTS 89835
01511 r.,OOBYF~ SERVICE STO~S TIRES 526 08
01634 EYDRO~EX, INC. ~N KIEEN 149 03
CUAIN/E~ LUBE 1676.95
1828 98
01697 ILLINOIS MATERIAL ~DLINU PARTS 475 20
~ PARTS 69 00
544 80
04629 INDUSTRIA~ STEEL SERV. NTR PARTS 636 87
01872 ~ATTOF CUEV~OLNT, INC MISC AUTO REPAIR 1192 13
MISC AUTO REPAIR 110 00
1302 13
01893 LENIS EQUIPMENT CO SUPPLIES 326 84
CLEANING SUPPLIES 557 90
884 74
01914 LEND INDUSTRIES, INC REPAIR 25 00
POLICE EQUIPMENT 056 60
581 60
01974 MATCO TOO~S SCUFF PADS/~ACK~AD 155 60
02059 MORTON GRO~E ANT~OTIVE NEST AUTO REPAIR PARTS 390 00
02195 NORTHWEST DEN TRUCK CENTER TNOCK PARTS 119 93
02241 ENE STOP TELECa~U~IC~TIOUS ~B-$ERUTCE 165 44
02326 POLI~R~ NO?OR C~PARY SERVICE 1042 31
CREDIT-SERVICE 316 85-
725 46
02336 POWER EQUIPMZN~ LEASING CO ENPAIRE 350 00
02374 ~ALITY DISCOUUT APTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS 74 00
02525 8ECRfTARY OF STATE LIC~SE P~TE STICUEE 234 00
02601 SPRING ALIGN PARTS 1033 79
REPORT APBOARDRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 16 58 . RUN THUREDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 17
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PARARNTAR TO TAR BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM ~RCH 01 2000 TO ~[%RCH 16 2000
DER ~DOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION MOUNT
02684 TERENCE SUPPLY COMPARY SUPPLIES 1 58
GRE CTLINDER RENTAL 3 10
4 60
02769 U~TC~ AOTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 43 12
REPAIR PA~TS 72 52
115 64
02791 VEEXCAR MAINTENANCE BROGI~,%~ WAGNER BULB 286 73
02861 ~ST SIDE T~CTOR SAL~ ~PAIR PA~TS 843 92
SUPPLIES 254 20
1098 12
TOTAL 15457 19
C(19~U~ITY SERVICE PR~A
01008 BUSRB'S FLORERE & GIFTS ~LO~ERS 2275 B0
02067 MOU~ PROSRBC~ HISTORICAL SOCI JAN/F~B }~S 5833 34
2000 BD~FT ALLDOATIO}I 2916 67
8750 01
02301 pETTY CASH - FI}lARCH EEF~ MISC EXPENSES 55 45
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC NORES TARVEL & EUPPLIF~ 28 00
02467 ROUSE-EXNDHURST SHOP CB~,INC MARCH ~NT 2000 00
02560 SISTER CI~IES REGISTER-J L SCOTT 40 00
02794 VFW POST 1337 ~ORIAL DAY PARADE 900 00
TOTAL 14040 46
CAPITA~ rMP[~I~ENT PRO~
04740 BEYAK, THOMAS REBATE 400 00
01049 CD~ GOVERnmENT, INC JET DI~CT PRINTERE 2747 51
PRINTER CABLE 761 99
SUPPLIES 761 99
4271 49
04746 CLOCNTORER DEVELOPMENT L~C PAY}~5~T PER INCENTIVE AGAR~ 50000
01377 FRDEk%5 REPARSS CORP AIRBILL 14 00
01469 GATEWAY COMP~IRE INC COMPNTER/P~IOM 1703 00
C~UTER/P~NTIOM 1606 00
COMPNTER/PENTIUi~ 2067 00
CPMPUTRBS/PENTIUi'4 3212 00
REPORT APHOARUNPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 RUN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PAGE 18
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF 8ILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ERUN MARCH 01 2000 TO I{k°,CH 16 2000
DE~ ~;HNDOR NUN VUNDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIETIUN k~OUNT
..................................................................................................................................
CUNRNTER/PENTIUN 1681 08
CC~PNTER/RENTIUN 3212 00
13481 00
02341 PRECISION METALS, 2NC DOOR FRAME 1040 00
TOTAL 69206 49
RISK ~AMAGE~{EET
01306 DRUG CARD, INC. ERESCRIFrIUN CARD CL%AMS 10437 70
04626 ~MSCO MA~AG~ENT SE~ICES DONALD BURGER 286 61
01737 INTERGOVE~NTAL PER BEN COOP LI~E INS 2082 80
mO ILL 50700 71
MHD IN8 101256 74
ADMIN ~EES 6871 98
160912 23
01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC BODY ~EPAIR 790 74
BODY REPAIRE 1436 82
2227.56
01966 i~ARTIN BOYER COMPAMY,INC W/C CLAJ~ 8AMTOS BANTIETA 60000.00
WORKERE CUNP CLAIM 12062 88
72062 88
TOTAL . 245926 98
G~A~D TOTAL . 1317347 49
REPORT APBOA~DRPT GENERATED 5 NOV 99 15 58 R~UN THURSDAY MAR1600 14 28 PACE 19
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
]~IST OF BIL~ PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROW MARCH 0I 2000 TO MARCH 16 2000
SUI~4~RY BY FUND
001 GENERAL FUND 505806 24
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 113807 29
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX ND 19786 70
070 CC~%4UNITY DEV~LPI~T BLC<K RERT 201 16
510 CAPITAL II{PROVE~ENT FUND 1040 0S
850 DOWNTOWN REDEVI~PI~YT COl{ST 50014 00
590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 400 00
610 WATER mD SEWER FUND 238187.51
630 PARKING SYST~ REVENUE FUND 943 90
660 VEHICLE MAINT~ANUE FUND 15457 19
680 COWPUTER REPIACEME~ FUND 17752 49
690 RISK MARACEMENT FUND 278304 66
770 FLEXCC{~P ESCROW FUWD 27092 18
790 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 48554 20
TOTA~ 1317347 49
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET REVENUE
AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES
January 1 - February 29, 2000
VILLAGE OF 'MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
Budc~et_ Revenue Summary i0 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
01/01/00 - 02/29/00.,
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
REVENUE BY CLASSIFICATION
PROPERTY TAXES 555,017 833,541 9.752,255 8.918,714 91 5
OTHER TAXES 381,025 578,257 16,475,226 15,896,969 96 5
LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 559,286 651,988 2,987,400 2,335,412 78 2
INTERGOVERMENT REV 637,426 637,579 8,269,200 7.631,621 92 3
CHARGES FOR SERVICE 851,999 1,673,778 12,179,620 10,505,842 86 3
FINES AND FORFEITS 22,712 51,042 531,500 480,458 90 4
INVESTMENT INCOME 409,876 737,148 4,948.162 4,211.014 85
REIMBURSEMENTS 4,709 24,869 788,300 763,431 96 8
OTHER REVENUE 224,710 466,110 2,893,955 2,427,845 83 9
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 15,240 48,990 5,136,500 5,087,510 99 0
Total All F%~nds 3,662,000 5,703,902 63,962,118 58,258,816 91 1
REVENUE BY FU1TD
GENERAL FUND 1,716,161 2,314,391 26,315,250 24,000,899 91 2
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 187,561 911,875 9,261,000 2,949,125 90 4
MOTOR FUEL TAxX FUND 127,400 133,420 1,420,700 1,287,280 90 6
LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 20 20 0 -20
CO~4UNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 8 16,199 367,700 351,501 95 6
ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 0 0
LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GP~T 1996 0 0 0 0
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 1,584 4,978 49,046 44,068 89 9
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B 0 0 0 0
POLICE & FIRE HLDG B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B 41,980 53,453 621,089 567.636 91 4
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 13,740 35,574 355,390 319,816 90 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOP~T B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPF~T B&I 1996B 4,723 12,859 127,332 114.473 89 9
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 151 416 4,095 3,679 89 8
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 3,915 8,812 539,406 530,594 98 4
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 555 1,056 210,597 209,541 99 5
REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B 729 1,400 282,426 281,026 99 5
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 311 579 176,170 175,591 99 7
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 313 574 213,958 213,384 99 7
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 6 13 66,024 66,011 100 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 5,583 14,480 153,348 138,868 90 6
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 834 1,541 502,565 501,024 99 7
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 0 0 244,150 244,150 100
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 1,890 3,673 538,851 535,178 99 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 387 747 114,034 113,287 99 3
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 176 178 153,741 153,563 99 9
STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FU/~D 9,650 20,068 1,584,000 1,563,932 98 7
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 233 468 0 -468
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 568 1,142 0 -1,142
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPWNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 6,995 17,132 1,950,991 1,933,859 99 1
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 192,079 206,891 2,371,600 2,164,709 91 3
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 19 38 0 -98
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
Budget Revenue, Summary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
SSA #7 WRITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 3,818 7,836 3,156,850 3,149,014 99 8
WATER AND SEWER FUND 448,846 805,480 7,599,200 6,793,720 89 4
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 16,990 34,318 216,900 182,582 84 2
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 92,544 185,129 1,110,392 925,263 83 3
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 106,193 231,152 1,082,981 851,829 78 7
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 10,613 21,263 121,733 100,470 82 5
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 283,401 564,609 3,415,394 2,850,785 83 S
POLICE PENSION FUND ~68,644 340,230 2,777,520 2,437,290 87 8
FIRE PENSION FUND 209,746 346,168 2,812,560 2,466,392 87 7
BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 488 980 6,000 5,020 83 7
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 0 0 0 0
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 0 0 0 0
SSA ~1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 60 121 0 7121
SEA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 3,186 4,039 39,125 35,086 89 7
SSA %7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
Total All Funds 3,662,000 5,703,302 63,962,118 58,258,816 91 i
03/14/2000 ~ ~ %~ ~ ~ 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 35 33 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Ca~gory within Fund Summary 01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
GENERAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 383,584 577,076 6,685,955 6,108,879 91 4
41 OTHER TAXES 147,297 255,854 9,954,800 9 698,946 97 4
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 501,610 594,312 2,750,500 2,156,188 78 4
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV 498,271 498,424 5,000,500 4,502,376 90 0
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 51,897 120,488 600,920 480,432 79 9
45 FINES AND FORFEITS 22,712 51,042 531,500 480,458 90 4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 43,443 73,099 360,000 286,901 79 7
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 17,914 34,544 275,300 240,756 87 5
48 OTHER REVENUE 49,433 109,552 155,475 45,923 29 5
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL HENERAL FUND 1,716,161 2,314,391 26,315,250 24,000,859 91 2
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 129,684 201,964 2,419,300 2,217,336 91 7
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 53,009 99,536 791,700 692,164 87 4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 4,868 10,375 50,000 39,625 79 3
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 187,661 311,875 9,261,000 2,949,125 90 4
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV 139,155 139,155 1,380,700 1,241,545 89 9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 3,588 6,934 40,000 33,066 82 7
47 REIMBURSEMENTS -15,343 -12,669 0 12,669
TOTAL MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 127,400 133,420 1,420,700 1,287,280 90.6
LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK ORANT
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 20 20 0 -20
TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK URANT 20 20 0 -20
COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV 0 0 307,700 307,700 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 8 8 0 -8
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 16,191 60,000 43,809 73 0
TOTAL COMMT*NITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 8 18,199 967,700 351,501 95 6
ASSET SEIZURE FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 0 0
LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 1996
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 35 34 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
suM08I Budget Revenue by Category,within Fund SLurm~ary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK ORA~T 1996 0 0 0 0
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A
40 PROPERTY TA/(ES 1,255 4,070 48,000 43,930 91 5
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 329 908 1,046 138 18 2
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 1,584 4,978 49,046 44,068 89 9
pUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B
40 PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY BaI 1987B 0 0 0 0
POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A
40 PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I 1993B
40 PROPERTY TAXES 40,494 90,431 599,000 548,569 91 6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,486 3,022 22,089 19,067 86 3
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REFUND 67B & 91A B&I 1993B 41,980 53,453 621,089 567,636 91 4
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A
41 OTHER TAXES 12,071 32,170 340,000 307,830 90 5
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,669 3,404 15,390 11,986 77 9
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOT~-LDOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 13,740 35,574 355,390 319,816 90 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT E&I 1994B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
03/14/2000 ~
2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 35 34 ~ 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF__OUNT PROSPECT
SUMO21 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B
41 OTHER TAXES 142 399 4,000 3,601 90 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 9 17 95 78 82 1
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 151 416 4,095 3,679 89 8
DOWNTOWN REDEVL E & I 1999
41 OTNER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 3,915 8,812 39,406 30,594 77 6
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 500,000 500,000 100 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL E & I 1999 3,915 8,812 939,406 530,594 98.4
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 200,510 200,510 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 555 1,056 10,087 9,031 89 5
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL E&I 1992A 555 1,056 210,597 209,541 99 5
REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 270,000 270,000 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 729 1,400 12,426 11,026 88 7
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REFURDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993B 729 1,400 282,426 281,026 99 5
FLOOD CONTROL E&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 169,800 169,800 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 311 579 6,370 5,791 90 9
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 311 579 176,170 175,591 99 7
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 207,000 207,000 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 313 574 6,958 6,384 91 8
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 313 574 213,988 213,384 99 7
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 65.000 65,000 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 6 13 1,024 1,011 98 7
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & ! 6 13 66,024 66,011 100 0
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 35 34 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 5,418 14,156 152,600 138,444 90 7
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 165 324 748 424 56 7
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 5,583 14,480 153,348 138,868 90 6
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 495,000 495,000 100 0
46 INI~STMENT INCOME 834 1,541 7,969 6,024 79 6
TOTAL EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I ~ 834 1,541 502,565 501,024 99 7
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 6,000 6,000 100 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 238,150 238,150 100 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 0 0 244,150 244,150 100 0
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 510,000 510,000 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,890 3,673 28,851 25,178 87 3
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 1,890 3,673 538,851 535,178 99 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 108,000 108,000 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 387 747 6,034 5,287 87 6
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 387 747 114,034 113,287 99 3
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 153,000 153,000 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 176 178 741 563 76 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 176 178 153,741 153,563 99.9
STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV 0 0 380,000 380,000 100 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 9,650 20,068 45,000 24,932 55 4
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 135,000 135,000 100 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 1,024,000 1,024,000 100 0
03/14/2000 ¥ ~ * 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 35~34 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
su~021 Budget Revenue by Category,within Fund Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 9,650 20,068 1,584,000 1,563,932 98 7
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 233 468 0 -468
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 233 468 0 -468
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 560 1,142 0 -1,142
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 568 1,142 0 -1,142
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST
41 OTHER TAXES 2,609 7,322 73,491 66,169 90 0
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 4,386 9,810 40,000 30,190 75 5
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 450,000 450,000 100 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 1,387,500 1,387,500 100 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 6,995 17,132 1,950,991 1,933,859 99.1
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 120,410 120,410 2,063,600 1,943,190 94 2
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 57,076 87,076 233,000 175~924 75 5
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 14,593 29,405 75,000 45,595 60 8
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 192,079 206,891 2,371,600 2,164,709 91 3
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 19 38 0 -38
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 19 38 0 -98
SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL BSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 S
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 5% ) Completed
19 35 34 (
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT , 10Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
SUM02i Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 100 0
46 ~ INVESTMENT INCOME 3,818 7,836 30,000 22,164 73 9
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 ] 1,926,850 1,926,850 100 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 3,818 7,836 3,156,850 3,149,014 99 8
WATER AND SEWER FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 85,558 131,827 1,545,300 1,413,473 91 5
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 339,073 638,067 5,869,900 5,231,833 89 1
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 14,761 25,203 175,000 149,797 85 6
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 3,000 3,000 100 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 9,454 10,383 6,000 -4,383 -73 1
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL WATER ~ SEWER FI/ND 448,846 805,480 7,599,200 6,793,720 89 4
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
42 LICENSES, pERMITS & FEES 600 600 3,900 3,300 84 6
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 13,440 27,651 178,000 150,349 84 8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,950 6,067 35,000 28,933 82 7
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL PARKIN~ SYSTEM REVEN~E FUND 16,990 34,318 216,900 182,582 84.2
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 92,035 184,066 1,104,392 920,326 83 3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 809 1,063 6,000 4,937 82 3
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL VEHICLE ~AINTENANCE FL~TD 92,544 185,129 1,110,392 925,263 83 3
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUArD
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 68,583 137,165 822,981 685,816 83 3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 22,370 44,997 300,000 155,003 77 5
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 18,240 48,990 60,000 11,010 18 4
TOTAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT F~/N~D 106,193 231,182 1,082,981 851,829 78.7
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 9,478 18,956 113,733 94,777 83 3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,135 2,307 8,000 5,693 71 2
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 10,613 21,263 121,733 100,470 82.5
03/14/2000 ~ 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 35 34 ~ 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF OUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by,Category within Fund Su~nary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 224,484 447,849 2,697,994 2,250,145 83 4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 13,662 28,209 140,000 111,791 79 9
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 2,138 2,994 80,000 57,006 95 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 43,117 85,557 517,400 431,843 83 5
TOT~RISK MANAGEMENT FL~ND 288,401 564,609 3,415,394 2,850,785 88 5
POLICE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 105,073 211,268 1,720,000 1,508,732 87 7
48 OTHER REVENUE 63,471 128,962 1,057,520 928,558 87 8
TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND 168,544 340,280 2,777,520 2,437,290 87.8
FIRE PENSION FUND
46 I}~;ESTMENT INCOME 150,511 230,703 1,850,000 1,619,297 87 5
48 OTHER REVENUE 89,235 115,465 962,560 847,095 88 0
TOTAL FXRE PENSION FUND 209,746 846,168 2,812,860 2,466,392 87 7
BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 488 980 6,000 5,020 83 7
TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 488 980 6,000 5,020 83 7
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 0 0 0 0
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVEb~3E 0 0 0 0
TOT~-LESCROW DEPOSIT FL~TD 0 0 0 0
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 60 121 0 -121
TOT~SSA #1 PROSPECT ME~DOWS B&I 60 121 0 -121
BSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I
41 OTHER T~2(ES 3,082 3,832 38,125 34,293 89 9
46 IN1rESTMENT INCOME 104 207 1,000 793 79 3
TOTAL ESA #6 GEORUE/~BERT B&I 3,186 4,039 39,125 35,086 89.7
SSA ~7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 35 35 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unrecelved Unrecelved
Received Recezved Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100 0
TOTAL MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100 0
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months ( 18 8~ ~ Completed
10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remalnlng
Budget Expenditure S%umnary
01/01/00, -~ 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
EXPENDITURE BY CLAESIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES 1,391,507 2,579,495 17,979,196 15,399,701 85 7
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 374,630 680,182 4,725,690 4,045,508 85 6
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 8,701 22,740 312,405 289,665 92 7
PENSION BENEFITS 276,665 552,608 3,261,465 2,708,857 83 1
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 388,376 1,537,314 12,384,940 10,847,626 ~ 87 6
UTILITIES -24,822 24,644 436,029 411,385 94 3
INSURANCE -176,358 359,658 3,408,574 3,048,916 89 4
COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,450 155,077 1,308,460 1,153,383 88 1
OTHER EXPENDITURES 201,131 675,001 1,689~562 1,114,561 66 0
LAND IMPROVEMENTS -4,625 0 190,000 190,000 100 0
BUILDINGS 0 0 0 0
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS -32,279 11,863 143,000 131,137 91 7
OFFICE EQUIPMENT 11,691 33,280 334,483 301,203 90 1
MOBILE EQUIPMENT -15,618 106 838,800 838,694 100 0
OTHER EQUIPMENT 16,477 54,926 613,468 558,542 91 0
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS -26,763 6,300 803,628 797,328 99 2
INFRASTRUCTURE -318,635 2,722 9,165,939 9,163,217 100 0
BOND PRINCIPAL 66,206 66,206 3,838,966 3,772,760 98 3
INTEREST EXPENSE 78,438 243,882 1,342,268 1,098,386 81 8
BANK AND FISCAL FEES -1,S00 300 11,480 11,180 97 4
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 1,024,000 1,024,000 100 0
Total All Funds 2,214,672 6,906,304 63,812,353 56,906,049 89 2
J
03/i4/2000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 ~onths ( i6 6% ) Completed
39 32 4~ Budget Expenditure Summary 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remalnln9
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 0 0 157,634 157,634 100 0
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 0 0 102,900 102,900 100 0
STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND -52,407 28,772 1,771,653 1,742,881 98 4
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 52,030 52,030 100 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 0 13,850 13,850 100 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLpMNT CONST I998 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 203,438 588,546 2,116,000 i,527,454 72 2
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND -~92,357 0 2,929,717 2,929,717 100 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND -17,235 1,420 3,301,117 3,299,697 100 0
WATER AND SEWER FUND 348,834 842,972 7,998,218 7,155,246 89 5
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 15,944 28,526 274,551 246,025 89 6
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 72,572 138,970 1,103,331 964,361 87 4
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND -15,618 106 838,800 838,694 100 0
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 8,530 14,350 36,250 21,900 60 4
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND -212,252 318,557 3,213,743 2,895,186 90 1
POLICE PENSION FUND 134,195 255,459 1,699,730 1,444,271 85 0
FIRE PENSION FUND 138,045 288,255 1,513,035 1,224,780 80 9
BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 2,900 5,727 34,800 29,073 83 5
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 0 0 39,155 39,155 100 0
SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 ~ 0
Total All Funds 2,214,672 6,906,304 63,812,353 56,906,049 89 2
'03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 34 33 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT l0 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budg~et, ~xpenditure Summary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 34 33 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 Months ( 83 3% } Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Suaunary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T*D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE MANAGER' S OFFICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
0]/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 ~4 33 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget ~Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 '02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
TV SERVICES DIVISION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 ~4 ~3 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Sununary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE CLERK' S OFFICE Expended Expended - Budget Balance Percent
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
33 VILLAGE OF ~OUNT PROSPECT lO Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM051 Department Budget'Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 15,750 30 812 216,415 185,603 85 8
02 ACCOUNTING 21,001 42,014 283,652 241,638 85 2
03 DATA PROCESSING 21,095 43,042 197,931 154,889 78 3
04 DUPLICATING SERVICES 582 1,254 11,300 10,046 88 9
05 INSURANCE PROGRAMS 16,956 33,570 205,898 172,325 83 7
06 CUSTOMER SERVICES 30,365 55,959 307,023 251,064 81 8
07 CASH MANAGEMENT 2,431 8,090 34,940 29,850 85 4
Totals 108,180 211,741 1,257,156 1,045,41S 83 2
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 57,510 110,246 717,073 606,827 84 6
S1 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 15,522 30,410 190,256 159,846 84 0
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 351 1~254 8,550 7,296 85 3
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22,319 40,665 155,014 114,349 73 8
55 UTILITIES -789 355 5,000 4,645 92 9
56 INSURANCE 12,576 28,153 150,913 125,760 83 3
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 446 2,746 28,450 25,704 90 3
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 245 912 1,900 988 52 0
Totals 108,180 211,741 1,257,156 1,045,415 83 2
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 108,180 211,741 1,257,156 1,045,415 83 2
Totals 108,180 211,741 1,257,156 1,045,41S 83 2
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 34 3~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT io Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM03i Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COM/4UNITY DEVELOPMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROORA~ TOTALS
01 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 11,756 27,464 175,345 147,881 84 3
02 pLANNING & ZONING 13,103 30,660 223,060 192,400 86 3
03 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 5,572 9,144 69,388 60,244 86 8
05 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 32,693 83,082 547,541 464,459 84 8
06 HOUSING INSPECTIONS 13,315 31,036 248,347 217,311 87 5
07 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 6,832 13,828 99,164 85,336 86
Totals 83,271 195,214 1,362,845 1,167,631 85 7
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
S0 PERSONAL SERVICES 62,961 134,738 914,624 779,886 85 3
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 20,071 41,443 262,574 221,131 84 2
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 681 4,542 20,735 16,193 78 1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,545 13,233 132,117 118,884 90 0
55 UTILITIES -1,631 733 17,475 16,742 95 8
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -2,356 525 15,320 14,795 96 6
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
Totals 83,271 195,214 1,362,845 1,167,631 85 7
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 83,271 195,214 1,361,845 1,166,631 85 7
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 0 0 0 0
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 0 0 1,000 1,000 100 0
Totals 83,271 195,214 1,362,845 1,167,631 85.7
03/i4/2000 2 Months ( 16 8% ) Completed
33 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remalnln~
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget ~Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02~29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CDBG Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
04 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 1,837 2,420 18,169 15,749 86 7
05 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 0 0 96,155 96,155 100 0
06 ACCESSIBLTY & NEIGEBRED IMPRV 0 0 50,000 50,000 100 0
07 CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHAB 284 284 126,545 126,261 99 8
Totals 2,121 2,704 290,869 288,165 99.1
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 502 990 11,023 10,033 91 0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,338 1,407 2,546 1,139 44 7
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 0 1,000 1,000 100 0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -26 0 98,455 98,455 100 0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 23 23 1,300 1,277 98 2
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 284 284 126,545 126,261 99 8
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 50,000 50,000 100 0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0 0 0
72 INTEREST EXPENSE 0 0 0 0
Totals 2,121 2,704 290,869 288,165 99 1
SOURCE OF FUNDS
070 COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 2,121 2,704 290,869 288,165 99 1
Totals 2,121 2,704 290,869 288,165 99 I
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 ~4 3~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Months ( 83 3~
FRRDBR01
SUM09I Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
HUMAN SERVICES Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PRO~RAMTOTALS
01 HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 3,973 12,738 134 177 121,439 90 5
02 SOCIAL SERVICES 18,275 42,429 331,317 288,888 87 2
03 NURSING/REALTH SERVICES 5,204 12,517 91,292 78,775 86 3
04 SENIOR PROGRAMS 2,206 8,501 77,111 68,610 89 0
05 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 0 0 0 0
Totals 29,658 76,185 633,897 557,712 88
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 ~ PERSONAL SERVICES 29,428 56,843 398,754 341,911 85 7
51 ~ EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,753 15,205 98,258 83,053 84 5
52 'OTRER EMPLOYEE COSTS -231 223 4,850 4,627 95 4
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -438 3,398 80,160 76,762 95 8
55 UTILITIES -798 337 5,280 4,943 93 6
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -5,968 177 41,395 41,218 99 6
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT -88 2 2,000 1,998 99 9
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 3,200 3,200 100 0
Totals 29,658 76,185 633,897 557,712 88.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 29,688 76,185 633,897 557,712 88 0
Totals 29,658 76,185 633,897 557,712 88 0
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remalnxng
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget,~Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
POLICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 POLICE ;tDMINISTRATION 131,954 231,976 1,748,643 1,516 667 86 7
02 PATROL & TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 379,240 734,694 5,486,527 4,751,833 86 6
03 CRIME PREVTN & PUBLIC SERVICES 13,826 26,854 208,738 181,884 87 1
04 INVESTIGATIVE & JUVENILE PRGM 71,929 138,690 972,165 833,475 85 7
05 CROSSING GUARDS 1,922 3,546 22,756 19,210 84 4
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 44,495 110,819 656,398 545,579 83 1
Totals 643,366 1,246,579 9,095,227 7,848,648 86 3
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 499,324 867,882 6,151,490 5,283,608 85 9
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 119,559 214,583 1,549,345 1,334,762 86 2
52 OTEER EMPLOYEE COSTS 3,490 4,205 76,000 71,795 94 9
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75,158 149,116 1,159,969 1,010,853 87 1
55 UTILITIES -3,999 4,034 40,750 36,716 90 1
57 COF~4ODITIES & SUPPLIES -7,122 6,759 81,350 74,591 91 7
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 24,833 24,833 100 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT -3,004 0 11,490 11,490 100 0
80 INTERFUND TPJ%NSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 643,366 1,246,979 9,095,227 7,848,648 86.3
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 643,366 1,246,579 9,086,394 7,839,815 86 3
060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 0 0 8,833 8,833 100 0
090 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 1996 0 0 0 0
Totals 649,366 1,246,579 9,095,227 7,848,648 86 3
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
34 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months ( 83 3% } Remalnln~
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Sun%mary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
FIRE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 119,220 189,435 1,439,697 1,250,262 86 8
02 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 344,587 727,950 4,745,927 4,017,977 84 7
03 FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY 0 0 19,135 15,135 100 0
04 ~ FIRE PREVENTION 24,622 50,075 403,012 352,937 87 6
05 FIRE COMMUNICATIONS -679 3,790 47,605 43,815 92 0
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 29,144 60,387 399,396 339,009 84 9
07 EMERGENCY PREPARDENESS PRGM -3,502 0 16,010 16,010 100 0
08 PAID-ON-CALL PROGRAM -1,228 2,587 29,008 26,421 91 1
Totals 912,164 1,034,224 7,095,790 6,061,566 85.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
S0 PERSONAL SERVICES 386,934 742,128 9,079,796 4,333,668 85 4
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 102,824 180,551 1,338,802 1,158,251 86 5
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS -243 5,351 109,250 103,899 95 1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 24,088 82,499 38S,442 308,943 78 6
55 UTILITIES -1,888 4,489 33,080 28,591 86 4
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -3,081 9,071 96,478 87,404 90 6
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3,610 3,610 8,100 4,490 55 4
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT -80 6,525 48,845 42,320 86 6
Totals 512,164 1,034,224 ?,095,790 6,061,566 85 4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 OENERAL FUND 512,164 1,034,224 7,095,790 6,061,566 85 4
Totals 512,164 1,034,224 7,095,790 6,061,566 89 4
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 ~4 ~4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT l0 Months ( 83 3% ~ Rema~.~ng
FRRDBR01
Department Budget,Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/i4/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
34 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT io Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Suaunary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS/BLDGS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGP. AM TOTALS
01 STREET DIVISION ADMINISTRATION 13,590 18,576 121,218 102,642 84 7
02 MAINTENANCE - PUBLIC BUILDINGS 31,489 94,537 654,963 560.426 85 6
04 STREET MAINTENANCE 12,686 35,968 486,569 450,601 92 6
05 SNOW REMOVAL 85,595 140,828 304,238 163,410 53 7
06 LEAF REMOVAL 2,524 6,000 150,971 144,971 96 0
07 STORM SEWER & BASIN MAINT 362 3,742 143,071 139,329 97 4
08 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS 14,516 24,656 58,135 33,479 57 6
09 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 6,733 10,927 93,546 83,019 88 4
11 PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 15,944 28,526 274.551 246,025 89 8
Totals 183,439 363,760 2,287,662 1,923,902 84 1
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 132,091 206,524 989,948 783,424 79 1
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 23,078 40,633 239,062 198,429 83 0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,286 30,091 385,251 355,160 92 2
55 UTILITIES 176 6,451 15,550 9,099 58 8
56 INSURANCE 514 1,026 6,166 5,140 83 4
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 22,203 76,313 309,280 232,967 75 3
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 10,300 10,300 100 0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE -2,909 2.722 332,105 329,383 99 2
Totals 183,439 363,760 2,287,662 1,923,902 84 1
~OURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 141,490 280,402 1,852,111 1,571,709 84 9
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 26,005 54,832 161,000 106,168 65 9
630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 18,944 28,526 274,551 246,025 89 6
Totals 183,439 363,760 2,287,662 1,923,902 84.1
03/14/2000 ~ 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 34 34 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget,; Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/GRNDS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
FROGRAM TOTALS
01 FORESTRY DIVISION ADMIN 12,220 20,211 162,167 141,956 87 5
02 MAINTENANCE OF GROUND 12,474 22,578 297,309 274,731 92 4
03 FORESTRY PROGRAM 6,115 40,693 631,257 590,564 93 6
04 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION -2,142 312 48,599 48,287 99 4
Totals 28,667 83,794 1,139,332 1,055,538 82 6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 35,544 60,471 580,864 520,393 89 6
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,902 21,798 145,568 123,770 85 0
52 OTRER EMPLOYEE COSTS 997 997 1,240 243 19 6
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -17,463 188 362,270 362,082 99 9
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -2,118 340 37,960 37,620 99 1
66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT -195 0 11,430 11,430 100 0
Totals 28,667 83,794 1,139,332 1,055,$38 92 6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 38,267 83,794 1,129,432 1,045,638 92 6
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND -9,600 0 9,900 9,900 100 0
Totals 28,667 83,794 1,139,332 1,055,538 92 6
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 3~ 34 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Suaunary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 ENGINEERING SERVICES 18,438 69,763 586,810 517,047 88 1
05 TRAFFIC CNTRL & STREET LGHTNG -5,513 19,097 413,643 ~394,546 95 4
Totals 12,925 88,860 1,000,459 911,593 91 1
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 30,921 52,865 453,293 400,428 88 3
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,195 14,956 109,659 94,703 86 4
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 486 614 5,400 4,786 88 6
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -8,856 19,099 156,361 137,262 87 8
55 UTILITIES -9,957 0 160,530 160,530 100 0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 723 1,326 14,110 12,784 90 6
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT -2,600 0 4,000 4,000 100 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 2,100 2,100 100 0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE -5,987 0 95,000 95,000 100 0
Totals 12,928 88,860 1,000,453 911,593 91 1
~OURCE OF FUNDS
001 OENERAL FUND 13,443 78,839 798,453 719,614 90 1
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND -518 10,021 202,000 191,979 95 0
Totals 12,925 88,860 1,000,453 911,593 91 I
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 34,34 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget ~Expenditure Su/nmary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y~T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEWER Bxpended Bxpended Budget Balance Percent
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 34 34 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months { 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended~
Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DISPOSAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 REFUSE DISPOSAL PROGRAM -3,514 467,607 3,228,956 2,761,349 85 5
Totals -3,514 467,607 3,228,956 2,761,349 85 $
BXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 3,950 7,983 65,687 57,704 87 8
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,331 2,666 18,661 15,995 85 7
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 1S0 150 880 730 83 0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -9,112 456,370 3,134,783 2,678,413 85 4
55 UTILITIES -31 37 464 427 92 0
56 INSURANCE 198 401 2,381 1,980 83 2
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 0 6,100 6,100 100 0
Totals -3,514 467,607 3,228,956 2,761,349 85 5
SOURCE OF FUNDS
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND -3,514 467,607 ~ 3,228,956 2,761,349 85 5
Totals -3,514 467,607 3,228,956 2,761,349 65 5
03/14/2000 ~ 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 34 3s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Suamnary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - VEHICLE MAI~=T Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 34 35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Sum~mary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
19 34 35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 18 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM03i Department Budgst Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 VILI~GE IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIP -47,782 28,772 629,533 600,761 95 4
02 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS -10,366 0 1,065,000 1,065,000 100 0
03 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST 203,438 588,546 2,115,000 1,526,454 72 2
04 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS -17,235 1,420 3,301,117 3,299,697 100 0
06 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS -287,282 0 4,144,237 4,144,237 100 0
07 POLICE/FIRE BUILDING CONST 0 0 0 0
09 MOTOR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 215,618 106 838,800 838,694 100 0
10 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 8,530 14,350 36,250 21,900 60 4
11 CAPITAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals -166,315 633,194 12,129,937 11,496,743 94.8
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,597 15,249 171,520 156,271 91 1
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 201,322 574,717 1,525,000 950,283 62 3
62 LAND IMPROVEMENTS -4,626 0 190,000 190,000 100 0
63 BUILDINGS 0 0 0 0
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS -32,279 11,863 93,000 81,137 87 2
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 7,843 22,340 267,750 245,410 91 7
66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT -15,618 106 838,800 838,694 100 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT -14,816 8,919 305,033 296,114 97 1
69 INFRASTRUCTURE -309,739 0 8,738,834 8,738,834 100 0
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals -166,315 633,194 12,129,937 11,496,743 94 8
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 0 0 0 0
050 MOTOR FURL TAX FUND -94,925 0 1,071,520 1,071,520 100 0
060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK ORA/gT 0 0 0 0
070 COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 0 0 0 0
080 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 0 0
500 STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND -52,407 28,772 1,771,653 1,742,881 98 4
520 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 52,030 52,030 100 0
530 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 0 13,850 13,850 100 0
540 DOWNTOWN RRDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 203,435 588,546 2,115,000 1,526,454 72 2
560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND -192,357 0 2,929,717 2,929,717 100 0
570 FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
880 SSA #7 W~ITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND -17,235 1,420 3,301,117 3,299,697 100 0
630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 0 0 0 0
670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND -15,618 106 838,800 838,694 100 0
680 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 8,530 14,350 36,250 21,900 60 4
690 RISK Funl~AGEMENT FUNq) -5,741 0 0 0
Totals -166,318 633,194 12,129,917 11,496,743 94.8
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT18 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
DEBT SERVICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 DEBT SERVICE - PROPERTY TD~XES 125,000 125,000 703,785 578,785 82 2
03 DEBT SERVICE - TAX INCREMENT -750 165,744 1,674,001 1,508,257 90 1
04 DEBT SERVICE - H/R SALES TAX I 18,894 18,644 1,788,085 1,768,441 98 9
05 ~DEBT SERVICE - R/R SALES TA=X 2 0 0 878,788 878,788 100 0
06 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA B & I 0 0 39,155 39,155 100 0
Totals 143,144 310,388 5,083,814 4,773,426 93 9
RXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
71 BOND PRINCIPAL 66,206 66,206 3,730,066 3,663,860 98 2
72 INTEREST EXPENSE 78,438 243,882 1,342,268 1,098,386 81 8
73 BANK ;UqD FISCAL FEES -1,500 300 11,480 11,180 97 4
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 143,144 310,388 5,083,814 4,773,426 93 9
BOURCE OF FU~rDS
140 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 125,000 125,000 47,000 -78,000 -166 0
150 pUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B 0 0 0 0
160 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
170 REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B 0 0 656,785 696,785 100 0
249 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
250 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 0 0 410,167 410,167 100 0
260 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
270 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B -450 0 143,514 143,514 100 0
280 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B -300 0 4,588 4,588 100 0
290 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 300 165,744 962,388 796,644 82 8
300 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
310 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 0 0 343,200 343,200 100 0
320 REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B 0 0 307,502 307,502 100 0
330 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 0 0 186,160 186,160 100 0
340 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A -450 0 J 213,748 213,748 100 0
350 FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I -300 0 63,710 63,710 100 0
360 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I -300 0 153,344 153,344 100 0
380 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 19,644 19,644 613,227~ 593,583 96 8
390 FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 0 0 60,538 60,538 100 8
410 STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 0 ) 0 618,254 618,254 100 0
420 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 0 0 157,634 157,634 100 0
430 ?TREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 0 0 102,900 102,900 100 0
810 SSA ~1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
830 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 0 0 39,155 39,155 100 0
840 SSA #7 MITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
Totals 143,144 310,388 5,083,814 4,773,426 93 9
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9,34 3s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lo Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
RETIREE PENSIONS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 34 3s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Depar~m. ent Budget Expenditure S~-anary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
RISK MANAGEMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 CASUALTY & PROPERTY INSURANCE -39,322 103,827 781,371 677,544 86 7
02 MEDICAL INSURANCE -157,589 214,730 2,422,472 2,207,742 91 1
Totals -196,911 318,557 3,203,843 2,885,286 90 I
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
84 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 41,900 41,900 100 0
56 INSURANCE -196,911 318,587 3,161,943 2,843,386 89 9
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals -196,911 318,557 3,203,843 2,885,286 90 i
SOURCE OF FU~S
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND -196,911 318,857 3,203,843 2,885,286 90 1
Totals -196,911 318,557 3,203,843 2,885,286 90 i
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 ~4 9s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months { 03 3% ) Remalnln~
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/0i/00 - 02/29/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
NON-DEPARTMENTAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 CONTINGENCIES -475 0 1,024,000 1,024,000 100 0
Totals -475 0 1,024,000 1,024,000 100 0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 0 0 0
53 PENSION BENEFITS 0 0 0 0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES -475 0 0 0
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 1,024,000 1,024,000 100 0
Totals -475 0 1,024,000 1,024,000 100.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND -475 0 1,024,000 1 024,000 100 0
Totals -475 0 1,024,000 1,024,000 100 0
23
03/14/2000 2 Months ( 16 6% ) Completed
~9 ~ 3~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 Months ( 83 3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 02/29/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROORAMTOTALS
02 ~ LIBRARY SERVICES 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100 0
Totals 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100 0
EXPENDITURE CLAgSIFICATION
90 COMPONENT UNIT EXPENDITURES 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100 0
Totals 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100 0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
950 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100 0
Totals 0 0 ~4,311,000 4,311,000 100 0
PROCLAMATION
SENIOR CELEBRATION DAY
MAY 10, 2000
WHEREAS, educabon is a lifelong process, and
WHEREAS, public education ~s a community enterpnse, and the philosophy of community
education advocates full use of public fac~l~bes, programs and services by every age group
~n the commumty, and
WHEREAS, the skllIs, talents and expenences of semor c~bzens are untapped resources
in many communities and intergenerat~onal cooperabon promotes efficient use of human
resources, and
WHEREAS, community education promotes the use of community resources, community
volunteers in schools, semor citizen centers and community agencies, and maximizes the
use of human resources to prowde educabonal opportunity for commumty residents of all
ages, and ~
WHEREAS, the goal of community educabon ~s to promote a shanng, canng, learmng
comroumty, and
WHEREAS, semor c~t~zens have earned our respect and recognition for their past
accomplishments, and their present and future contributions, and
WHEREAS, "Honor The Past - Imagine The Future" ~s the theme of SENIOR CITIZEN
CELEBRATION DAY, co-sponsored by the H~gh School D~stnct 214 Commumty Education
Program and the V~llage of Mount Prospect, to encourage and develop programs and
act[wt[es to meet the needs of ail the citizens ~n H~gh School D~strlct 214 and the V~llage
of Mount Prospect
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L Farley, Mayor of the V~llage of Mount Prospect, do
hereby proclaim May 10, 2000 as
"HONOR THE PAST - IMAGINE THE FUTURE"
day ~n Mount Prospect ~n recogn[bon of the Twelfth Annual Semor Celebration Day
Furthermore, I call upon the residents of High School D[str~ct 214 as well as the residents
of Mount Prospect to recognize and celebrate the bonds they have discovered, the
partnerships they have formed, and the sense of community they have strengthened
through commumty educabon programs
Gerald L Fadey
Mayor
ATTEST
Velma W, Lowe
V~llage Clerk
Dated th~s 22"d day of March, 2000
PROCLAMATION
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WEEK
APRIL 2-8, 2000
WHEREAS, the safety of the buddings we occupy da~ly is essenbal to the health, safety,
and welfare of the c~bzens of the wodd, and
WHEREAS, among the wodd's most fundamental laws are those which provide safety
standards for the safe construcbon of buildings ~n which people bye, work and play, and
WHEREAS, for construction and building codes to be effective and enforced,
understanding and cooperabon must exist between code officials and the people they
serve, and
WHEREAS, through the efforts of code officials worldwide, and their cooperabve
relationship w~th the construction ~ndustry, the admlmstrabon of health and hfe-safety
standards ~s assured, and
WHEREAS, units of government across the world, as well as numerous professional
orgamzat]ons, are joining together to promote the use of building and construction codes
today, for a lifetime of budding safety, through the observation of International Building
Safety Week, and
WHEREAS, the theme of Intemabonal Building Safety Week for 2000 has been
established as "Let Commumbes Know That Codes Save L~ves"
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L Fadey, Mayor of the V~llage of Mount Prospect, do
hereby proclaim the week of Apnl 2-8, 2000 as
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WEEK
and I urge all c~bzens to participate in International Bu~Id~ng Safety Week actiwtles to
help promote braiding safety, to create awareness as to the ~mportance of construcbon
and building codes, and to spotI~ght the role of the dedicated code official m
adm~mstenng those
Gerald L Fadey
Mayor
ATTEST
Velma W Lowe
V~llage Clerk
Dated th~s 22"a day of March, 2000
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Ilhnms
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E JANONIS
DATE. MARCH 15, 2000
SUBJECT: SISTER CITIES ORDINANCE
Begmmng ~n the late 1980's, the Village embarked on a quest to estabhsh a S~ster C~t~es
relationship Over the course of the next decade, an Ad Hoc Committee of Mount
Prospect residents convened to accomphsh that goal Several close encounters have
taken place w~th c~t~es ~n the Czech Repubhc, Hungary, Umted K~ngdom and, most
recently, France
In late 1999, Mayor Gerald L. Fadey led a delegation of Mount Prospecters to the c~ty of
Sevres, France, a suburb outside of Pans. The purpose of the trip was to explore
Sevres' interest in twinning w~th Mount Prospect in a formal relationship The trip
proved successful and a delegation from Sevres was invited to visit Mount Prospect m
May 2000 w~th the end result being the execution of documents formahzing a S~ster
C~tles relationship
S~nce the tnp to Sevres, the Sister Cities Ad Hoc Committee has been busy planmng
the details of the May v~s~t as well as dehberatmg over the need for the creation of a
formal S~ster C~tles Commission Creation of a permanent S~ster C~tles Commission
would give a higher degree of cred~bd[ty to the work of the group as well as g~ve ~t
access to the resoumes of the Vdlage
At its March 14 Committee of the Whole meeting, the Vdlage Board considered and
concurred w~th a draft Ordinance creating a Sister C~tles Commission The size of the
Commission would be 15 members ~
MEJ/rcc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A
SISTER CITIES COMMISSION
Preamble
The Corporate Authorities of the V~llage of Mount Prospect desire to estabhsh a
S~ster Cities Commission to recommend pohcies and estabhsh programs for the
V~llage's participation in the S~ster C~t~es International Orgamzabon
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the President and Board of Trustees of the
V~llage of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Ilhno~s, as follows
SECTION'I: A new Article XV shall be added to Chapter 5 of the Mount
Prospect Village Code which shall be and read as follows
5.1501. PURPOSE.
The purpose of the Sister C~t~es Commission is to recommend
pohc~es and programs to enhance the V~llage's participation in the Sister
C~t~es International Organization, and to maintain any relationship the
V~llage might establish w~th a S~ster City. It is recogmzed that there ~s no
financial, pohtlcal or rehgious goal of the program The sole objective of
the Commission and the program is to promote goodwill and international
understanding
5.1502. CREATION AND MEMBERSHIP.
There is hereby created a permanent Commission which shall be
known as the Sister Cities Commission of the V~llage, consisting of fifteen
(15) members, a majority of whom shall be citizens of the wllage. The
members of the S~ster C~t~es Commission shall be appointed by the
Village President with the consent of the Board of Trustees In addition,
the Village President shall be an ex officio member of the S,ster C~t[es
Commission.
A When first appointed, the members of the S~ster C~tles Commission
shall serve respectively for the follow~ng terms
Three (3) for one (1) year,
Three (3) for two (2) years,
Three (3) for three (3) years,
Four (4) for four (4) years, and
Two (2) for five (5) years
or untd their respective successors have been duly appointed and
quahfied
1. Upon creation of the S~ster C~t~es Commission, the Chairperson, who
shall be a voting member appointed by the Vdlage President, w~th the
advice and consent of the Vdlage Board, shall serve for a term of five
(5) years, or untd h~s/her successor has been duly appointed and
qualified
2 After the initial term, the successor of each member and the
Chairperson so appointed, shall serve for a term of four (4) years, or
until h~s/her successor has been duly appointed and qualified The
Chairperson shall serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms as
Chairperson
B The Vdlage President shall have the power to remove any member of the
S~ster C~t~es Commission
.C. Vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired term of the member or the
Chairperson whose seat has become vacant by appointment of the
V~llage President w~th the consent of the Board of Trustees
D Immediately upon its organization, the S~ster C~t~es Commission
shall select from ~ts membership a V~ce Chairman and a Secretary
The persons so selected shall serve for terms of one year and may
be reelected.
E The Commission may also establ~sh committees as It may, from
t~me to t~me, deem appropriate The committees may include, but
not be limited to the following (1) Special events, (2) Schools, (3)
Houses of worship, (4) Service Clubs, (5) Seniors, (6) Municipal,
(7) Commercial, and (8) Youth. Committee members need not be
Commission members, but Committee membership requirements
shall be the same as for Commission membership
5.1503. MEETINGS.
A The S~ster C~t~es Commission may meet as needed but shall be
required to meet on the first Thursday of each March, June,
September and December Special meebngs may be called by the
V~llage President, the S~ster C~t~es Commission Chairman, or by
any throe (3) members of the S~ster C~t~es Commission
B The S~ster C~bes Commission' shall adopt rules for the conduct of
its meetings and keep written m~nutes of all meebngs and
proceedings.
C A copy of all minutes shall be forwarded to the V~llage Clerk for
official records
D All meetings of the S~ster Cities Commission shall be public and its
minutes shall be available for examination during regular business
hours
5.1504. OBJECTIVE AND ROLE OF THE SISTER CITIES COMMISSION.
The objective of the Sister Cities Commission shall be to
encourage and facilitate programs and exchange between Mount
Prospect and its S~ster C~ty. The S~ster C~bes Commission shall funcbon
as advisor to the V~llage Board on the following objectives
A Development of annual programs and exchanges
B The provision of such programs and exchanges, including finding
and providing for host famlhes and cultural experiences for
approved visits by Sister Cities residents, and plans for reciprocal
v~s~ts for Mount Prospect rosidents and business persons ~n the
S~ster City.
5.'1505. ANNUAL REPORT.
Each September, the Sister C~bes Commission shall make an
annual report to the President and Board of Trustees with respect to the
following
A Exchanges and projects in the Village within the past twelve (12)
months
B Planned exchanges and projects for the future
C Recommendabon of measures w~th respect to the S~ster C~bes
'program that should be considered by the Corporate Authorities m
the following twelve (12) months
D Quahty of cooperabon between Mount Prospect and Its Sister C~ty
E Budget recommendations for the program's future
SECTION 2: That th~s Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
~ts passage, approval and publ~cabon in pamphlet form ~n the manner provided by law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED th~s day of ,2000
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST
Velma Lowe, Vdlage Clerk
VWL
2/28/00
3/2/00
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
820 EAST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, Taco Twins, Inc (hereinafter referred to as "Pet~boner") has filed a
pet~bon for a Cond~bonal Use and variations with respect to property located at 820
East Rand Road, (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally
descnbed as follows
Lot 1 in Jo Jo's Subdivision, a subdivision of part of the NW 1/4 of the SW
¼ of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Pnnc~pal
Mend[an, ~n Cook County IIhno~s,
and
WHEREAS, the Pebt~oner seeks a Cond~bonal Use to construct a fast food restaurant
with a drive-through facihty, and
WHEREAS, the Pebboner seeks vanabons to reduce the parking requirement from
forty (40) parking spaces to thirty-five (35) spaces, and to reduce the front parking
setback from thirty feet (30') to ten feet (10'), and
WHEREAS, a Pubhc Heanng was held on the request for a Conditional Use and
variations being the subject of ZBA Case No 26-99 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of January, 2000, pursuant
to proper legal not~ce having been pubhshed m the Mount Prospect Journal & Top~cs
on the 11th day of August, 1999, and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted ~ts findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request
being the subJect of ZBA 26-99, and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount Prospect
have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same
meets the standards of the V~llage and that the granting of the proposed Cond~bonal
Use and variations would be in the best interest of the Vdlage,
Page 2/3
820 E Rand Road
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE The recitals set forth here~nabove are ~ncorporated as findings of
fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect
SECTION TWO The President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use, as provided in Section 14 1703 of the
Vdlage Code, to allow the construction of a fast food restaurant w~th a dnve-through
facd~ty, and
~u~C~LO~dJ~E~' The President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant variations, as prowded ~n Section 14 2224 of the V~llage
Code, to reduce the parking requirement to th~rty-five (35) spaces, and to reduce the
front parking setback to ten feet (10'), as shown on the S~te Plan, a copy of which ~s
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"
SECTION FOUR Prior to the issuance of a budding permit relative to the Conditional
Use and variations, the following conditions and/or written documentation shall be
fulfilled
1. Development of the site ~n conformance w~th the s~te plan prepared by
Thomas V. Scesmak Associates dated July 20, 1999 and rewsed
November 28, 1999 (Attachment 1)
2. SubmIssion of a final landscape plan in conformance with the site plan
and meeting all requirements of Article 23 of the Zomng Ordinances
3. Development of the building in general conformance w~th elevations
prepared by Thomas V. Scesmak Associates, dated July 20, 1999 and
modified to provide for brick construction.
4. Submittal and approval of final eng~neenng plans meeting all
Development Code requirements
5 Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Bu[ld~ng Code and
Fire Code requirements
6 Approval of appropriate permits by I D O T. and M W R D
7. Submittal of documentation conclusively demonstrating the existence of
cross access agreements between the subject property and adjacent
proper[~es (Thunderbird Lanes and Menards) prior to consideration of the
Conditional Use by the Vdlage Board
8. Relocate the menu board to be located adjacent to stacking space 7.
Page 3/3
820 E Rand Road
9 W~den the perimeter landscape buffer to the east of the dnve-through
lane to meet the 10' m~mmum w~dth, as required by Arbcle XXIII
10 W~den the s~te access/egress to three lanes with separate right and left
turn exit lanes
SECTION FIVE: The Wllage Clerk ~s hereby authorized and d~rected to record a
certified copy of th~s Ordinance w~th the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County
SECTION SlX' Th~s Ordinance shall be ~n full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and pubhcabon ~n pamphlet form ~n the manner prowded by law.
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED th~s day of ,2000
Gerald L. Farley
Vdlage President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Vdlage Clerk
1712 Martha Lane ~)
Mt Prospect, IL 60056
March 10, 2000 ICOMMUNrr~'DEVELOPMEr'JT DEPT
MrWllhamCooney, Jr i l ~
D~rector of Commumty Development ~ J ~ L~O0
Vdlage of Mt Prospect
100 S Emerson Street _ RECEiV r
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 ~_ _,..u --_.,
Dear Mr Cooney,
I am requesting waiver of the first reading of the approved variance which was
passed at the recent board meeting on March 7, 2000 It ~s my understanding
that the first reading w~ll be read at the March 21, 2000 board of d~rectors
meeting
My w~fe L~sa will present at the March 21, 2000 meebng ~n case there are any
questions
Please let me know ~f I can be of further assistance
708-453-6233 xl 1 (work)
847-437-1728 (home)
VWL
3/15/00
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
1712 MARTHA LANE
WHEREAS, Marion Klatka (hereinafter referred to as "Petlboner") has filed a pet~bon
for a Vanabon w~th respect to property located at 1712 Martha Lane (hereinafter
referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally descnbed as follows
Lot 29 ~n Colomal Heights F~rst Add~bon, being a Subd~vision of part of Lots
5,6, and 7 in Owner's Subdivision, being a subd~wsion of the Southeast
Quarter (except the West half of the Southwest Quarter thereof) of Section
10, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Pnnc~pal Mend~an,
according to the plat of said Colomal Heights F~rst Addition registered ~n the
Office of the Registrar of T~tles of Cook County, Illinois on May 16, 1961 as
Document Number 1977989, in Cook County Illinois,
and
WHEREAS, the Pebboner seeks a Variation to construct a two-car garage, twenty
four feet by twenty-eight feet (24'x28'), which exceeds the maximum size I~m~t allowed
by the Mount Prospect Village Code, and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Vanat~on being the
subject of ZBA Case No 35-99 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 27th day of January, 2000, pursuant to proper legal not~ce
hawng been published ~n the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 10~ day of January,
2000, and
WHEREAS, the Zomng Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount
Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount Prospect
have given cons~derabon to the request here~n and have determined that the same
meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Vanat~on
would be ~n the best interest of the V~llage
Page 2/2
1712 Martha Lane
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE The recitals set forth here~nabove are ~ncorporated as findings of
fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount Prospect
SECTION TWO The President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant a Vanat~on, as provided ~n Section 14 203 C of the Vdlage
Code, to allow the construction of a two-car garage which exceeds the maximum
size hm~t allowed by the V~llage Code, as Shown on the S~te Plan, a copy of which ~s
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"
SECTION THREE Th~s Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after ~ts
passage, approval and pubhcat~on ~n pamphlet form)n the manner provided by law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED th~s day of ,2000
Gerald L. Farley
, V~llage President
ATTEST
Velma W Lowe
Vdlage Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRosPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER '~.
FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
,
DATE MARCH 3, 2000
HEARING DATE MARCH 7, 2000
- - SETBACK FOR
SUBJECT ZBA-02-2000 120 YATES LANE SIDE YARD
CONSTRUCTION OF A WOOD DECK
LAWRENCE METZGER - APPLICANT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits then: recommendation to approve a proposed setback Variation to allow
eonstruetlon of a wood deck The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at then: February 24, 2000 meetlng
The proposal is a request for Variation to permit a proposed wood deck to encroach 3' into the required 7 5' side
interior setback The deck would be located in the side interior yard of the existing house at 120 Yates Lane The
proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staff memo
The Zonmg Board of Appeals discussed the proposed Variation m terms of Zomng Cede Variation Standards Some ZBA
members stated that conslructmg the deck according to code requirements would leave a shady area m which landscaping
would not grow well and would be difficult to maintain The ZBA members felt that this eondmon could be construed as
a hardship Based on thst finding, the ZBA voted 5-0 to recommend approval ofthe proposed Variation to permit a wood
deck to encroach three feet mto the required 7 5' side setback at 120 Yates Lane, Case No ZBA-02-2000
William J ~Cooney, AICP, Dn'ector of Commtm~ty Development
/JP
H \GEN~PLNGW~BA~ZBA 2000hMEI Memos~ZBA-02-2000 Memo (Me~ger) doe
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM. JEFF PERKINS, PLANNEI~y
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2000
HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 24,2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-02-2000 - 120 YATES LANE
SETBACK VARIATION TO PERMIT A WOOD DECK TO ENCROACH THREE FEET
INTO A REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Lawrence M and Melody G Metzger
120 Yates Lane
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owners of the Property
Parcel Number: 03-35-405-013
Lot S~ze: 10,290 square feet
Existing Zoning: R1 Single Family Restdence
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
Lot Coverage: 28% ex~stmg
28% proposed
45% maxanum per RI d~stnct
Requested Action: Proposal for a Variation to allow construction of a wood deck to encroach three feet ~nto the reqmred
7 5' side setback
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The subject property ~s an emstmg smgle-story home located on a 75' X 138' (10,290 square feet) single-family corner
lot on a residential street The existing house has a front setback of J0 66' from Yates Lane The house has a 20-foot
setback from the side street, Thayer Street, which the house faces
The petitioner xs seeking to construct a 14' X 20' wood deck m the s~de yard As the ex~stmg side setback is 18 6', the
proposed deck would be 4 6' from the property hne The s~de setback requirement m the R1 distr~ct is 10% of the lot
width, or 7 5' feet for the subject property The appheant proposes to replace an ex~sting deck m the location The
existing deck was apparently built without a permit
To conduct its analys~s of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and
visited the s~te
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Meeting of Febr~a~ 24, 2000
ZBA-02-2000 Page 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Variation Standards
Required findings for all variations are contained m Section 16 203 C 9 of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code The section contains seven specific findings that must be made m order to approve a variation These standards
relate to
~ A hardship due to thc physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
genarally apphcable to other properties m the same zoning d~stnct and not created by any person presently
having an interest in the property,
r~ lack of desire to increase financml gain, and
~ protection of the public welfare, other prope~3', and neighborhood character
The subject parcel is a 10,178 square foot coroer lot that is relatively level, out of any Rood zone and rectangular The
parcel is developed with a single family home with an attached garage The house is situated so that the house faces a
s~de street and the "back yard" is subject to the interior side yard setback reqmrement The apphcant proposes to
reconstruct an ex~stmg deck that was budt without permits that encroaches into the required interior side setback by
three feet
The apphcant's stated reasons for the proposed variat~on are for the convemencc of the petitioner, and to save money
on the proposed deck The apphcant proposes the encroachment to prowde for a 14' w~de deck, rather than the 1 I'
maxtmum penmtted by code As the apphcant states m the apphcatlon, financml considerations are among the mam
factors motivating the Variation request
Addit~na~y~n~particu~arcond~t~n~fthe~t~makesthepr~p~sedencr~achmentnecessary The pet~tioner has an 11'
wide area, running the length of the house (735 s f), in which to bmld a deck The lot has additional area m the rear
yard in which decks or patios could be built There is not sufficient justification for a Varmtlon by the above hardshlp
standards
The proposed deck would not hkely have a negative or positive effect on the character of the ex~st~ng smgle-famdy
residential area or on the public welfare
RECOMMENDATION
Although the proposed variation would not have a significant effect on neighborhood character, the submittal does not
support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14 203 C 9 of the Zoning Ordinance
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA deny the proposed Variat~on to permit a wood deck to
encroach three feet (3') into the required 7.5' stde interior yard setback for the residence at 120 Yates Lane, Case No
ZBA-02-2000 The Vdlage Board's decision is final for thls case
I concur
~i'~Coo~ C~P, Director of Commumty Development
/$P
H ~GEN~PLNG~BAkZISA 2000~taff Memos~ZBA-02-2000 (Me~ger).do~
Lowden Lane
Small Lane
Thayer Street
Thayer St. ~
Henry. Street
Location Map Case No. ZBA 02-2000 Metzger Variation
Prtpared By: ~'__~
Village of Mount Prospect
Depa,tment of Community Development - Planning Division June 17, 1999 ~ t. ~ ~e
FHlage of Mount Prospect
I Variance Request
Pe~onal Residence
~ 12ON. YatesLane
Owners: Lawrence M. and Melody G. Metzger
: Part Nine of Submission Reqmrements
7 ~ ' 0
~T 270 IN 3~ ~DITION TO BL~TT'S FAIR~
BEING A S~DI~SION OF P~T OF ~ ~T 1/2
SOu'r~T 1/40P SE~IO~ 35, TO~SEIP 42 NOR~, ~GE 11,'
~T OF ~ ~I~ PRINCIP~ ~RID~, ACCO~ING T0 P~T
TI~S OF COOK CO~, I~INOIS ON ~Y 19, 1962
2023843 ·
,;I I',I ,' I t i I I I1,,~!I, , ~.~'-~ ,, I i ~ , i
,i t I ~ "1~I l
~t I I~ i! 1
I t I I I i, t t!~_ .
II I !'--? I it !.~~__.~_, ' ~LL_! i !
, II !t ~ ii d~~'~, I!11!
~1~1 ~ t ~ i tl I !1
-!~ I I I t ill
, ~,~ . .
I I I
.... ~~ .... ~__
~1~~~ ~. ~,. ] ,-
~ ' ,
t~~ ~
' ........ ~ ~ ~ / t~'-
I I t ' ..
MINUTES OF THE RE~AR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-~}2-2000 Hearing Date February 24, 2000
PETITIONER: Lawrence Metzger
SUBJECT PROPERTY: ' 120 Yates Lane · ~
PUBLICATION DATE: ' February 9, 2000 DAILY HERALD ~
REQUEST: ~ Variation to allow a wood deck to encroach 3' into the side interior yard
setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
, Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Kelth Youngqulst , ,,
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson . ·
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Lawrence Metzger
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7 35 p m Minutes of the January 27, 2000 meeting were
approved, with one abstention by Arlene Juraeek Ms Juraeek announced the postponement of Case ZBA-04-2000
until the meeting of March 23, 2000 The Board heard Case ZBA-37-99 and at 8 48, Chmrperson Juraeek tntrodueed
Case ZBA-02-2000, a Variat~on to allow a wood deck to encruaeh 3' into the side interior yard setback and stated that
the Village Board's declslon is final for thcs'ease
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, stated that pubh¢ notice had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the item, a
variation to allow construction cfa wood deck that would encroach three feet into the reqmred 7.5' side setback He
stated that the property Is an existing home on a 75' X 138' coruer lot on a residential street with a front setback of
30 66' from Yates Lane and a 20-foot sethaek from the side street, Thayer Street, which it faces He further stated that
the petitioner is seeking to replace an existing 14' X 20' wood deck in the s~de yard and that the house's side setback is
18 6 feet, so the deck Is 4 6' from the property hne He added that based on Building Division records, the existmg
deck appeared to have been built without a permit
Mr Perkins briefly described the proposal in terms of the Zoning Code standards and, based on a lack cfa finding of
hardship, gave staff's recommendation that the ZBA deny the proposed Variation
Mr Juraeek asked if Board members had any questions for Jeff. She then asked if the petitioner wanted to speak
Lawrence Metzger explamed he was asking for a Variation to build a deck 3' from their lot hne Mr Metzger passed
out pictures of bm house to the Board members He explained that h~s house ~s on a eoruer lot and eonsequantly his
back yard is to the side of his neighbor's house He explained that the original concrete patio and deck work is
substandard and needs replacement He stated the proposed deck would not infringe on the neighbor's privacy He
said his deck Is completely out of sight of any neighbors as it Is surrounded by spruce trees and a lance He stated he
wdl also install a new fence in the near future.
Zoning BoardofAppeals ~ · r t ~ , , ~ ~ ZBA-02-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ~ " Page 2
Richard Rogers asked whether the neighbor's dining roo~m~ wlndo~w looked out at their deck Mr Metzger said no, the
window is completely behind the spruce trees
Merrill Cotten asked if the concrete patio had been part of the original house Mr Metzger said it had an~l that~the
decks had been added later He explained the deck's posts just rest on the patio, they do not have concrete footings
Zoning Board members asked how the deck work had originally passed inspection, but Mr Floros reminded them that
the property was not part of the Village when the house was constructed
Mr Rogers said the petitioner did have a hardship because the lot layout had his backyard adjacent to the neighbor's
sideyard He also noted that the fence and trees do conceal the deck from the neighbor He stated the Variation could
be allowed w~thout setting a precedent due to the unusual relat~lonshlp of the lots ,~
Ms Juracek asked, if this Variation were allowed, would future owners of this house be able to extend their bml&ng
out to the same hne the deck would be Mr Perkins said Variations are absolute and would allow extension of the
house He added that the Zoning Ordinance does allow a condition to be placed on the Variation that would allow only
the deck to encroach At 9 05, Chairperson Juracek' closed the Pubhc Hearing and asked for discussion from the
Board There was no further discussion, and Ms Juracek asked for a roll call on the motion ~
Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for a Variation for the exclusive use to allow an uncovered
wood deck to encroach 3' into the required side yard setback Leo Floros seconded the motion
UPON ROLL CALL AYES Cotten, Floros, Youngqmst, Rogers, and Jurace~k ~
NAYS None
Motion was approved 5-0 ~
At 9 25 p m ~affer another case was heard, P, Jchard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Yo ngqmst
The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned ...... u,
Barbara Sw~atek, Planmng Secretary,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER '"~,
FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
!
DATE MARCH 3, 2000
HEARING DATE MARCH 7, 2000
SUBJECT ZBA-05-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MODIFY THE CR CONSERVATION
RECREATION ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - APPLICANT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Text Amendments to Sectmns 14 701,
14 702, 14 703, 14 704, and 14 705, comprising the CR Conservation Recreation Zomng D~stnct The Zoning Board
of Appeals heard the request at their February 24, 2000 meeting
The Commumty Development Department has reviewed several recent braiding permtt apphcatmns from local park
d~stncts that have been ~n conflict w~th the current CR zomng dtstnct The CR D~stnct currently reqmres that all
improvements permanently affixed to the ground to be set back 50' from all property lines Those setback
reqmrements make it difficult for park d~stncts to prowde needed facfl~ties The Mt Prospect Park D~stnet Is ~n the
process of working w~th residents of neighborhoods surrounding ex~st~ng parks to develop master plans for those
parks Village and Park D~stnct Staffs undertook a comprehensive review of ex~st~ng and needed facilities in local
parks to detenmne appropriate regulations to prowde for adequate park faetht~es and mlnim~ze ~mpaets on adjacent
residential properties The proposed changes are described ~n the attached ZBA staffmemo
The ZBA briefly d~scussed the proposed Amendments in terms of the Zomng Code Standards for Text Amendments
and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Amendments, Case No ZBA-05-2000
Wflham J Cooney Jr, AICP
/JP
H \GEN~LNG~ZBA~ZBA 2000'uMEJ Memos~ZBA-05-2000 (CR dtstnct)meJ doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANN~
I/
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2000
HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-05-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR TH~;
CR CONSERVATION RECREATION ZONING DISTRICT.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
100 S Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
REQUESTED ACTIONS.
A Modify Article 14 7 CR Zomng District as follows
ARTICLE VII
CR CONSERVATION RECREATION DISTRICT
SECTION
14 701 Purpose
14 702 Permitted Uses
14 703 Conditional Uses
14 704 Bulk Regulations
14 705 Landscaping
Sec. 14.701. Purpose. The CR District ~s intended to provide for the location of pubhe parks, golf courses,
swimming pools, eommumty facilities, and other open space uses or resources to serve the recreational needs of the
cmzens of the Village (Ord 4590, 9-21-93)
Sec. 14.702. Permitted Uses.
In the CR Conservation Recreation district, the only uses which may hereafter be estabhshed are
A Parks and playgrounds
B Unlighted Ballfields
C Golf co
D Tenms courts, swimming[ pools, and similar recreational activities
ZBA 05-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of February 24, 2000
Page 2
E Nature preservation areas
F Accessory t+s~, structures me,dental to and on the same zomng lot as the permitted use,; wh:ch
....... ~ ...... 4 .,,~ .....*~4 ..... ~' .......... ~.~ e~,~. 14, ~n4 ~c,~.,~ ~,,.~. ~'n.4 .~snn, n 2~ 93)
O Wireless service facilities shall be permitted as set forth in Section 14313E of this Chapter (Ord 4590,
9-21-93, Ord 4925, 4-21-98)
Sec. 14.703. Conditional Uses
The following uses may be allowed by conditional use ~ssued in accordance with the provisions of subsection
14 203F of this Zoning Ordinance
A Recreational complexes, conservatories 5' studios, museums, o~ community centers and similar Inst~tutions
B L~hted Ballfields
C Planned developments ~n conformance with Article V of this Chapter
D Detention or retention facllmes
E Accessory ....... a ~....~ ....
................ ~,~, structures me,dental to and on the same zoning lot as the condmonal use.;
................... v ............................................ v-*, rd a59n, 9 ' !
Sec. 14.704. Bulk Regulations.
A Yard Requirements Buddings Any building er :tr'.:'cture hereafter constructed or relocated m the CR
D~stnct shall maintain m~mmum yards as follows
All CR Zoned Properties
Front yard 50 feet
Exterior s~de yard 50 feet
2 Property hnes abutting non-residential property
Interior s~de yard Equal to the reqmred setback m the adlaeent district to the common property line
Rear yard Equal to the reqmred setback in the adlacent district to the common property line
3 Properly lines abutting res~dentml property
Interior side yard 50 feet
Rear yard 50 feet
B Yard Requirements Other Structures Any structure, other than a building, hereafter constructed or
relocated m the CR D~stnet shall ma~ntatn mtmmum yards as follows
I All CRZoned Properties
ZBA 05-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of February 24, 2000 ' ~
Page 3
Front yard I 0 feet
Exterior side yard I 0 feet
3 Property hnes abutting non-res~dentialproperty
Interior side yard 10 feet
Rear yard 10 feet
2 Property hnes abutting residential property
Interior s~de yard 25 feet
Rear yard 25 feet
C Lot Coverage No lot m the CR D~strlct shall be developed w~th total Imperv~ous surfaces exceeding twenty
five percent (25%)
D Height L~mttatlons
I No bufi&ngs er :tructurc: shall exceed three (3) stones or thirty feet (30') in hetght, whichever is less
2 No other structures shall exceed slxtV feet (60') tn height
E Yard Requirements No accessory structure shall be located m a required yard of the CR D~stnet unless
otherwise provided for in this section
F Permitted Obstructions in Required Yards Structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards
m the CR District as follows
I S~dewalks, steps, bikepaths, and similar faelhtles up to ten (10) feet tn width
2 Driveways
3 Eaves, storm gutters, chtmneys, and bay windows extending into such yards not more than twenty-four
(24) roches
Sec. 14.705. Landscaping
A Parklng Lots and buildings in the CR district shall be landscaped aceordln~ to the requirements of Article
XXIII
ANALYSIS
The CR Conservatton Recreation Zoning District was created tn 1993 as a part of a comprehensive update of the
Village's Zoning Code. The dmtnct replaced the then extstmg G Golf Course designation and added all parks and
conservation uses ~nto the new d~strlct A review of the Zoning case file from that case indicates that the several
Park Districts m the Village did not have an opportunity to give Input regarding the effects of the proposed d~stnct
on their properties
The Community Development Department has rewewed several recent building permit appheations from local park
districts that have been in conflict with the current CR zoning district The CR District currently lists a 50-foot
setback for all structures In the distrtct from all property hnes The Zomng Ordinance specifies that all
improvements permanently affixed to the ground are considered to be structures and the list of structures that may
encroach into setbacks Is extremely limited These requirements would require even minor structures, such as
benches, play eqmpment, baseball backstops, and sidewalks wider than the 3'-5' permitted tn residential districts to
ZBA 05-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of February 24, 2000
Page 4
meet the required .50' setback These reqmrements make it difficult for park d~strmts to provide for necessary
facilities, especially in small nmghborhood parks such as Owen, Countryside, East Wedgewood, and West
Wedgewood Parks See the attached exhibit "A' for an illustration of the effects of current regulatmns on small
neighborhood parks
The Mt Prospect Park District Is m the process of master plann,ng and updating all of their parks Prehmlnary
rewews of proposed changes to the parks md~cate that future plans for many parks developed by the park d~stnct, m
consultation w~th area residents, would be ~mposs~bl¢ without numerous Variations In the Interests of facdltatlng
the provision of needed recreational faeflit~es in the Vdlage, Village and Park District Staffs undertook a
comprehensive rcwew of ex,sting and needed facilities ,n local parks to determine appropriate regulations to
provide for adequate park fac,hi,es and m~mmize impacts on adjacent resident,al properties The proposed changes
are described ~n the following sectmns
PROPOSED CHANGES
Permitted and Conditional Uses
The existing hst of uses has been modified and reorganized to better support the CR District purpose included In
Section 14 701 The current regulations do not specify ballfie[ds, one ofthe most ~mportant uses in area parks, as a
permitted or conditional use m the D~stnct The proposed text includes unhghted fields as permitted uses L~ghted
fie[ds are included as condltmnal uses because of their potential for Impacts (parking, noise, etc) on nearby
properties Tenms courts, swlmmmg pools, and similar recreatmnal act~vmes were separated from golf courses due
to the very d~fferent natures of these uses Finally the text regarding recreational complexes and similar uses was
changed to focus more on recreational, rather than cultural and educational, famht~es
Bulk Regulations
Yard Requirements
The CR District yard requirements are the most important ~ssue addressed tn the proposed text amendments As
premous[y mentioned, the current regulations reqmre that all structures, including minor structures such as play
eqmpment must meet a 50' setback from all property lines The attached example shows the effect of the current
and proposed regulations on one site, Owen Park The current regulations make every improvement in the park
non-conforming The only area available for play eqmpment and other faeihtles that doesn't eonfhct with the
existing baseball field is the small area beyond center field The backstop for the baseball field also eonfhcts with
the current regulations The proposed regulations would allow for a much larger potential play area and most of the
existing improvements for the existing baseball field while still allowing for a 25' setback to the abutting residential
property The effect would be stmdar for other neighborhood parks
Braidings, as defined by the zomng code, "Any structure permanently affixed to the ground, used or intended for
supporting any use or occupancy," would still be regulated by the current 50' reqmred setback from streets and
res~dentlal properties Required interior side and setbacks for park buildings abutting non-residential properties
would be reduced to the required setback for that non-residential property This would allow for use of a larger part
of park s~tes in areas where there Is htt[e chance ora negative effect on the adjacent properties, while still providing
for the maximum protection for resldentml properties
Lot Coverage
Lot coverage reqmremants for CR zoned parcel would not be affected by this proposal
Height limits
The reqmred height hm~t for buddings m the CR d~stnct would not change
ZBA 05-2000 Text Amendments ~
Meeting of February 24, 2000 ~ ~,':'~; ~, t ', ~ ~
Page 5
The height limit for other structures in the district would be increased to 60' Th~s change would permit such
structures as ballfleld lights, backstops, and flagpoles to exceed the 30' height limit Items such as flagpoles and
backstops have very limited potential for impact on adjacent properties Ba[lfield lighting does have some potential
for neighborhood Impact However, increasing the height of poles allows hght~ng to be focused more directly onto
the field, which will reduce the overspfll of light onto adjacent properties
Permitted Obstructions
The proposed changes would allow for bike paths, sidewalks, jogging trails, and similar facilities, wider than the 3'
to 5' width allowed by Section 14 306 E 4 Under the current regulations, a bike trail in a park would be limited to
3' (side) or 5' (front) in width for the first 50' adjacent to the public sidewalk and then widen to a more appropriate
width interior to the site Returning to the Owen Park example, the existing 7' sidewalk leading from Owen Street
to the play area is in a side setback and would, therefore, be limited to 3' in width under the current regulations
Landscaping
The proposed change requires that parking lots in parks be landscaped according to the requirements of the
Village's Landscape Code
STANDARDS FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS
Section 14 203 D 8 b lists standards for the ZBA to consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code The
standards relate to
ca the general applicability of thc amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel,
consistency of the amendment with objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan,
ca the degree to which the amendment would create non-conformity,
o the degree to which the amendment would make the Zoning Code more permissive, and
consistency of the amendment with Village policy as established by previous rulings
The proposed amendments apply to all parcels in the CR Zoning District and do not affect a particular parcel The
changes are intended to facilitate the provision of necessary recreational facilities in the Village Thus, the proposed
amendments are consistent with purpose statement of the CR Zoning District and Parks and Recreation Goals and
Objectives included in Comprehensive Plan The proposed changes are intended to minimize non-conformities and
will not create any new non-conformity The proposed changes would make the code somewhat more permissive
However the changes in that direction are intended to further Comprehensive Plan Objectives In particular, the
changes facilitate Parks and Recreation Objective 2 "Develop new recreational facilities and programs which
respond to the specific desires of Village residents" and Objective 5, "Utilize existing park and recreational
facilities to the maximum" Thus, the amendments meet the Zoning Code Standards for Text Amendments
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings w~th respect to the standards for Text
Amendments in Section 14 203 D 8 b Therefore, Staffrecommends approval of the proposed Text Amendments
I Concur,
W~llh a~m~C ~ooney, llr ,~AICP
Director of Commumty Development
H \GEN~PLNGXZBA~ZBA 2000\StaffMemos~ZBA-05-99 (CR Text Amendments) doc
B U$$E A VENUE
Exhibit "A"
Owen Park
Ex~sbng Famhbes, Ex~sbng and Proposed Setback Reqmrements
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ~ '
CASE NO. ZBA-05-2000 ~ ~ Heanng Date February 24, 2000
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
PUBLICATION DATE: February 9, 2000 DAILY HERALD
R~ QUEST: Text Amendments to the CR Conservation Recreation Zoning· District
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Corian
Leo Floros
~ Richard R~ogers ~ ~
' Kelth Youngqmst
' Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ehzabeth Luxem ~
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7 35 p m Minutes of the January 10, 2000 meeting were
approved, with one abstention by Arlene Juracek Ms Juracek announced the postponement of Case ZBA-04-2000
until the meeting of March 23, 2000 The ZBA heard two cases At 9 06, Ms Juracek opened Case ZBA-05-2000,
proposed Text Amendments to the CR Conservation Recreation Zoning District and stated that the Vdlage Board's
decision Is final for this case
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, stated that public notice had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the item,
Text Amendments to the CR Conservation Recreation Zoning District He gave a brief history of the CR District and
described the problems created for local Park Districts by the provisions of the District
Mr Perkins then informed the Zoning Board that th~ Mt Prospect Park District is in the process of master planning
and updating all of their parks Preliminary reviews of proposed changes to the parks indicate that future plans for
many parks would be impossible under cmrent zoning standards without numerous Variations He stated that, in the
interests of facilitating the provision of needed recreational facilities, Village and Park District Staffs undertook a
comprehensive review of existing and needed facilities in local parks to determine appropriate regulations to provide
for adequate park facilities and minimize unpacts on adjacent residential properties
Mr Perkins then summarized the proposed changes to the District
Ad&tion of unhghted ball fields as permitted uses The current text includes fields as permitted uses
Addition of lighted fields as conditional uses '
Reduction of required setbacks for structures other than buildings, including minor structures such as play equipment
from 50' to 25' when adjacent to residential properties and 10' from other property lines
Reduction of required setbacks for buildings from property lines shared with non-residential properties from 50' to the
setback required for the non-residential
Increasing the height limit for structures other'than buildings to 60'
Addition of provisions to allow for bike paths, sidewalks, jogging trails, and similar facilities up to 10' in width in
setbacks
Zomng Board of Appeals ZBA-05-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ~ Page 2
Mr Perkins stated that, as described m th6~staff report, the amendments meet the Zomng Code Standards for Text
Amendments and gave staff's recommendation of approval of the proposed Text Amendments
Ms Juracek asked ffZonmg Board members had questions for Jeff, and asked if he had worked w~th the Park Dlstr~cts
m formulating these amendments Mr Perkins sa~d he had spoken with all the Park D~strtcts He sa~d R~ver Tra~Is
Park D~str~ct had an issue w~th the 60' height limit, as the Old Or'hard Golf Course had a problematic tee for the 16th
hole and golf balls are going ~nto the pool across the street ~ver Trads Park D~slx~ct would hke to ~nstall a structure
with netting to keep the balls out of the pool Mr Perkins sa~d the~ will need a Variation to do that
Keith Youngqu~st asked ff the w~reless service faethty referred to m the section was a cell tower and can they be
anywhere on the property as long as they are less than 60~. Mtehael Blue, Deputy Director of JC?mmunity
Development stated cell towers are handled m a separate section o~th? Zo~nmg Ordinance, 14 313
There was discusston among the members about cell towers and the wording In the text amendment Ms Juracek
asked ff wording could be changed to read "No oth~er s!ructure shall ex~ceed 60' m height except as permitted m section
14 313"
R~chard Rogers asked If a cell tower of 70' could be erected Michael Blue, Deputy Director~ of Community
Development, said the Ordinance reads "a park must be more than slx acres for a 70' tower".
Leo Flores sa~d that reqmrement ehmmated most neighborhood parks
In response to a quest:on about ereatmg non-conformities, M~ehael Blue satd staff had spent a year walking through
the parks and this amendment had been written for as many conditions as possible He said 95% of existing ri. on-
conformities will be dealt w~th by these amendments ~
Leo Flores made a motion to recommend approval for the proposed Text Amendments with one mothficat~on Richard
Rogers seconded the motion ' At 9 15, Chairperson Juraeek closed the Pubhe Hea~'mg and asked for diseusslon from
the Board
UPON ROLL CALL ~' ~ ~ ' AYES Cotten, Flores, Youngqmst, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS None
Motion was approved 5-0
. The motion was approved by a
At 9 25 p m ~ Richard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned ~ ' ' ~
Barbara Swmtek, Planning See~reta~y
~Je s ncr ~ ~
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 14 (ZONING)
OFTHE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Pet~boner (Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect) have filed an
application for certain text amendments to Chapter 14 (Zoning) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect to amend various regulabons, and
WHEREAS, the Pebboner seeks amendments to the following Secbons of the Village Code
Secbon 14 701 Purpose
Secbon 14 702 Permitted Uses
Secbon 14 703 Conditional Uses
Section 14 704 Bulk Regulabons
Section 14 705 Landscaping
WHEREAS, a Public Heanng was held on the proposed amendments, being the subject of ZBA
Case No 05-00, before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 24, 2000, pursuant to due and
proper legal nobce hawng been published in the Mount Prospect Da~ly Herald on the 9th day of
February, 2000, and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted ~ts findings and recommendations to the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village have g~ven conslderabon to the requests being the subject of ZBA 05-00
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE The recitals set forth herelnabove are ~ncorporated here~n as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
SECTION TVVO Secbon 14 701 entitled "Purpose" of Chapter 14, as amended, ~s hereby further
amended to read as follows
"The C-R D~stnct is intended to prowde for the locabon of public parks, golf courses,
swimming pools, community facilities, and other open space uses or resources to serve the
recreational needs of the clbzens of the Village"
~ Section 14 702 entitled "Permitted Uses" of Chapter 14, as amended, ~s
hereby further amended to read as follows
"In the C-R Conservabon Recreabon d~stnct, the only uses which may hereafter be
estabhshed are
A Parksand playgrounds
B Unlighted ball fields
Page 2 of 4
Text amendments
C Golf courses
D Tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar recreational activities
E Nature preservabon areas
F Accessory structures ~nc~dental to and on the same zoning lot as the permitted use
G W~reless service facd~bes shall be permitted as set fodh in Secbon 14 313 E of th~s
Chapter"
SECTION FOUR Secbon 14 703 entitled "Cond~bonal Uses" of Chapter 14, as amended, ~s
hereby further amended by deleting the current Sechon 14 703 and adding a new Section 14 703,
which shall read as follows
"The following uses may be allowed by conditional use ~ssued m accordance w~th the
provisions of subsecbon 14 203 F of th~s Zoning Ordinance
A Recreational complexes, conservatones, studios, museums, community centers
and s~mdar ~nshtubons
B L~ghted ball fields
C Planned developments ~n conformance with Article V of th~s Chapter
D Detention or retention fac~hbes
E Accessory structures, ~nc~dental to, and on the same zoning lot as the conditional
use"
SECTION FIVE Section 14 704 entitled "Bulk Regulabons" of Chapter 14, as amended, ~s hereby
further amended by deleting Section 14 704 and add~ng a new Section 14 704 which shall read as
follows
"14 704 BULK REGULATIONS
A Yard Requirements Bu~Idmgs Any building hereafter constructed or relocated
in the C-R D~stnct shall maintain m~n~mum yards as follows
1 All C-R zoned properties
Front yard 50 feet
Exterior s~de yard 50 feet
2 Property lines abutbng non-resldenbal property
Interior s~de yard Equal to the required setback in the adjacent
d~stnct to the common property I~ne
Rear yard Equal to the required setback m the adjacent
d~stnct to the common property hne
3 Property hnes abutting residential property
Intenor s~de yard 50 feet
Rear yard 50 feet
Page 3 of 4
Text amendments
B Yard Requirements Other Structures Any structure, other than a budding,
hereafter constructed or relocated ~n the C-R D~stnct shall
maintain m~n~mum yards as follows
1 All C-R zoned proped~es
Front yard 10 feet
Extenor s~de yard 10 feet
2 Properly I~nes abutting non-residential property
Intenor s~de yard 10 feet
Rear yard 10 feet
3 Property I~nes abutting residential property
Intenor s~de yard 25 feet
Rear yard 25 feet
C Lot Coverage No lot ~n the C-R D~stnct shall be developed w~th total ~mperv~ous
surfaces exceeding twenty-five percent (25%)
D Height L~m~tat~ons 1 No buddings shall exceed three (3) stones or thirty feet (30') ~n height,
whichever is less
2 No other structures shall exceed s~xty feet (60') ~n height
E Yard Requirements No accessory structure shall be located ~n a required yard of
the C-R D~stnct unless otherwise prowded for ~n th~s section
F Permitted Obstructions ~n Required Yards Structures shall be aIlowed to encroach
~nto the required yards ~n the C-R D~stnct as follows
1 S~dewalks, steps, b~ke paths, and s~mdar facd~t~es up to ten feet (10') ~n
w~dth
2 Driveways
3 Eaves, storm gutters, chimneys, and bay w~ndows extending ~nto such
yards not more than twenty-four ~nches (24')"
~' Section 14 705 entitled "Landscaping" of Chapter 14 (Zoning), ~s hereby created,
and shall read as follows'
"A Parking lots and buildings in the C-R D~str~ct shall be landscaped according to the
requirements of Ant~cle XXIII"
Page 4 of 4
Text amendments
SECTION SEVEN Th~s Ordinance shall be In full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and pubhcat~on in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED th~s day of ,2000
Gerald L Farley
Vdlage President
A'I-I'EST
Velma W Lowe
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER '"~
FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ I {~
DATE MARCH 3, 2000
HEARING DATE MARCH 7, 2000
RE ZBA 37-99 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PHASE IB - CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
FOR A MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
NORTHWEST HIGHWAY, BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND EMERSON STREET
BRUCE ADREANI, NORWOOD BUILDERS (APPLICANT)
The Zoning Board of Appeals Iransmlts their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use to permit the estabhshment of a
Planned Unit Development for a mixed-use development The proposed development consists of one structure
contaimng 22,700 square feet of commereml space and 34 condomtnmm units The site would be served by 32 on-site
surface parkmg spaces, 18 on street spaces, and 51 underground spaces The proposal also Includes modtfieatlons to
an existing pubhe parking lot and associated landscape improvements The proposal ts described m more detail m the
attached ZBA staff report
The ZBA expressed their support for the overall concept of the development, but had several concerns with the revised
elevatlons proposed by the appheant The ZBA felt that the revised elevations lack the contrast m materials and colors
shown in the initial RFP response from the apphcant The ZBA also stated their optmon that the proposed rooftree
lacked visual interest and needed to be modified The ZBA recommended modification of the proposed elevations to
address those concerns and bnng the proposed elevations into general comphanee with the elevations prowded with
the RFP response The ZBA also recommended that the apphcant provide samples of proposed building materials to
the Village Board to ensure that matermls used tn final construction are those proposed at the time of Vdlage Board
approval
A second major issue discussed by the ZBA was the proposed outside dmmg area The staff report for the item
included a contht~on of approval that the applicant provide a year-round dmmg area m place of the proposed outside
dlmng area and extend the 2nd and 3rd floor living units and the building facade over that area The ZBA felt that the
outside dtnmg would be a positive addition to the downtown and that the extension of the 2nd and 3~a floors would
hinder the vtstbihty of the retail spaces at the rear of the structure Based on that discussion, the ZBA removed that
condition from their recommendation
The ZBA voted 5-0 to recommend approval of a Conditional Use for the proposed mixed-use P.U D with the
following conditions of approval
1. Development of the site tn general conformance with the site plan prepared by Hayloek Design, Inc,
dated January 31, 2000, Basement Garage Plan prepared by Hayloek Design, Ine, dated January 24,
2000, and colored elevations prepared by HKM Architects + Planners, Inc, dated April 26, 1999
2 Submission of samples of all proposed building materials and approval of those building materials by the
Vdlage Board
3 The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Village of Mount Prospect to ensure that the tenant
m~x of the buddmg's commercial space fulfils the requirements of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan
4 Approval by the Plan Commission and Village Board of a Plat of Subthwslon for the subject property,
ineluthng all reqmred easements, prior to issuance ora bmlthng permit
5 Provision of appropriate agreements to allow for Village enforcement of parking regulations tn surface
parlang areas
6. Provision of appropriate easements to allow for Village maintenance of streetscape areas on private
property and to ensure pubhe access to streetscape areas
ZBA 37-99 Norwo~t Builders PUD Approval for a M~xed-use Development
Downtown Redevelopment, Phase IB
March 3, 2000
Page 2
7 Redestgn the parking bay to the rear of the commercial braiding south of the Sakura Restaurant to
comply w~th staff comments ~n the parking section of th~s report
8 Submission of a final landscape plan meeting all requirements of Article XXIII Landscape Code of the
Village of Mount Prospect Zomng Code and prowdlng for appropriate foundation planting areas and
~ ~ landscape features such as tree plantings and raised planter boxes to accent on-s~t pedestrian areas
9 The applicant shall participate financmlly ,n the design and select~on of appropriate focal points, such as
pubhc art, street furmture, or pubhc gathenng spaces at the comers of Emerson Street and Northwest
H~ghway and Ma~n Street and Northwest Highway
l0 Submittal and approval of final Engineering Plans meeting all Development Code requirements and/or
approval by the Plan Commission and V~llage Board of any necessary Development Code Exceptions
I 1 Provismn of an executed parking agreement wtth a nearby property to prowde an additional 32 parking
spaces to meet the site parking requirement
12 Submittal of final buddmg plans meeting all apphcable Bufldmg Code and Fire Code requirements
13 Approval of appropriate permits by I D O T and M W R D
H \GEN~LNGXZBA'~J3A 2000~IEI Memos~ZBA-37-99 Memo (PhaselB) mej memo.dee
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Developmdnt DelSartment
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNE~
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2000
HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-37-99, CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT TO PER_MIT CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 22,700 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL
SPACE, 34 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, AND MODIFICATIONS TO A PUBLIC
PARKING LOT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Bruce Adream
Norwood Builders
7458 N Harlem Avenue
Chicago, IL 60631
Status of Petitioner: Contract purchaser of the property
Property Owner: Village of Mount Prospoct
100 S Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Lot Size: 1 17 acres (50,965 square feet)
Existing Zoning: BSC Central Commercial Core
Existing Land Use: Vacant land and an exlstmg public parking lot
Requested Action: Petmoner is seeking Conditional Use approval for the establishment of a Planned Unit
Development for a mixed-use development consisting of one structure containing 22,700
square feet of commercial space and 34 condominium units, 32 on-site surface parking
spaces, 18 on street spaces, 51 underground spaces, modifications to an existing public
parking lot, and associated landscape improvements
BACKGROUND
Proposal
The Mount Prospect Downtown Strategic Plan, which was adopted by the Village Board as par~ of the
Comprehensive Plan in 1998, presents a vision for the downtown based on work by the Ad Hoc Committee with
input from the residents of Mount Prospect In the time since the plan was adopted, a great deal of work on
downtown redevelopment has been conducted related to TIF analysis, negotiating with property owners, and
working with potential developers in order to facilitate developments that are in keeping with that vision
ZBA 37-99 Downtown Redevelopment Phase IB
Meeting of February 24, 2000
Page 2
Phase IA of Downtown redevelopment, cons;sting of 205 condomlmums and a pubhc parking lot, was approved m
1999 and ~s currently under construction
Based on a Request for Proposals ~ssued last year, the Village Board selected the apphcant as the developer for
phase IB of Downtown redevelopment - a m~xed-use development at the northeast corner of Mare Street and
Northwest H~ghway
The subject property consists of seven parcels and a port,on of an e~ghth Ali of the parcels are currently vacant,
except a small part of the existing Village Hall Parking lot at the north side of the site The Village of Mount
Prospect has acqmred all of these properties and has a development agreement w~th the applicant for the purchase
and development of the property
The applicant proposes to construct Phase IB of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan on the site, according to the
approved development agreement with the Vdlage The proposed development would consist of 22,700 square feet
of commercml space on the ground floor and a total of 34 condominium units on the second and third floor The
site would be served by 51 parking spaces in an underground garage beneath the principal structure, 32 surface
spaces on the site, and 18 on-street spaces to be created with the development
Rewew and Approval Process
The subject s~te is in the B5C Central Commercial Core zomng district "Planned unit developments, mixed
commercial and residentml" are listed as Conditional Uses in the B5C district The applicant is seeking approval of
the proposed development, which consists of retail space and res~dential condominiums as a Planned Umt
Development (PUD) to Insure that the development's compliance with the purpose statement for PUDs, as defined
in Zoning Code Section 14 501 The proposed development may be permitted in the zoning district following
approval of the PUD as a Conditional Use The Condit~onal Use will require approval by the Village Board,
following a pubhc hearing and recommendation by the Zoning Board of Appeals
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Planned Unit Development]Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's
plat of survey, site plan, and elevations, met with the applicant to discuss the development, and visited the site
Comprehensive Plan I)esignat~on
The Downtown Strategtc Plan, adopted as an amendment to the Vdlage's Comprehensive Plan, designates the
property for a mixed-used commercial and residential development similar to the proposal As the proposed
development is p~art of the implementation of the Downtown Strategic Plan, ~t is consxstent with the Comprehensive
Plan
ANALYSIS
Setbacks
The B5C district does not specify setbacks for most developments Building setbacks are specified only when a site
is ad. laeent to residential development The subject property is not adjacent to residential developfi~ent The
proposed development has a m~mmum setback often feet from all rights of way and larger setbacks to the adjacent
properties to the north
Density
The proposed development ~ncludes 34 units on I 17 acres or 29 1 units per acre The Zoning Code requires a
maximum density of 30 umts per acre in the BSC d~strlct and does not specify a maximum density for Planned Unit
Developments in the B5C district
ZBA 37-99 Downtown Redevelopment Phase IB
Meeting of February 24, 2000
Page 3 '" ~
Budding Height
The submttted elevations do not specify the proposed build,ng hetght The proposed structure wtth one floor of
commeretal and 2 stones of residenttal scales to approximately 40 feet ,n he,ght The height hmtt tn the B5C
dtstnct ts 80 feet Submtsston of complete elevattons wtth the exact hetght wall be requ,red prior to Vdlage Board
constderatton of the ~tem
Elevations
The color renderings of the proposal submitted wtth the appl,cant's response to the V,llage's R F P. show a three-
story bufldtng wtth the appearance cfa row of multtple storefronts Except tn one small sectton, the bulld,ng has a
pitched roof
Bull&ng mater, als are not specified m the submittal The R F.P. submtttal shows a bml&ng facade along Northeast
Highway wtth nine &st,net sections Start,ng at the west end of the elevatton
1. a rounded section of light brown brick wtth a conical shingled roof, topped w~th a weather vane
2 a sectton of hght brown brick with a shingled gable roof and dormers
3 a sectton of betge unted pre-east concrete topped w,th a shtngled gable end
4. a second sectton of hght brown brtek with a shingled gable roof and dormers
5 a red brick sect,on wtth a gable roof covered w,th a metal roof
6 a dark brown brick seeUon wtth a gable roof, two gable ends, small dormers, and fanx chimneys
7 a flat-roofed sect,on of untmted pre-cast concrete and awnings on the upper floors
8 a second red brick seetton w~th a gable roof covered wtth a shingled gable roof
9 an octagonal secuon of pre-east concrete, wtth a metal roof topped wtth a weather vane or s~mflar feature
and awmngs on the upper floors
AIl of the first-floor storefronts along Northwast Htghway would be decorated w~th awnings The appheant has not
identified the specific building materials to be used in these locations The developer must submtt samples of all
bmldmg materials that are acceptable to the Village Board prior to final approval of the proposed development
Continuing along the Emerson Street, the facade repeats the themes of sections 9, 8, 7, and then 8 again, from the
Northwest H~ghway facade The hght brown brick section of the Emerson Street facade has been ehm~nated to
allow for more surface parking The first floor storefronts on Emerson Street would also be decorated with
awmngs
Directly north of the north end of the Emerson Street facade, the appheant proposes an outdoor al,rang area Th~s
area would be better utthzed as a semi-enclosed dming area wtth shdmg glass or stmilar doors that would allow for
use of the area most of the year, rather than just tn the summer. This could also allow for e~ther adthttonal hwng
area m the condominiums above or larger terraces for those umts Thts arrangement would also allow for the
elevattons to extend farther along Emerson Street to be more in keeping wtth the elevatmns proposed tn the ongtnal
RFP submission
The appheant has subrmt~ed sketch elevattons w~th the appheatton that carry out the general theme of the colored
elevations meluded with the R F.P response, but ehmmata much of the architectural detatl The ZBA should
reqmre that the final elevations submttted will be consxstent with the colored elevations included w~th the R F P
response and mamtammg the architectural detads and colors of that subm~ss,on
Parking
The parking reqmrement for residentml structures tn the BSC d~strict ts one space per umt for one-bedroom umts
and I 5 spaces per umt for two-bedroom units The proposed development contains 28 two-bedroom units and 6
ZBA 37-99 Downtown Redevelopment Phase lB
Meeting of February 2,l, 2000
Page 4
one-bedroom umts for a Code requirement of 55 spaces The development agreement with the developer specifies
a parking requirement of I 4 spaces per unit, for a requirement of 48 spaces The parking reqmrement for
commercml structures in the BSC district Is four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area m excess of 1,500
square feet The proposed development has 22,700 square feet of commercial space, for a requirement of 85
spaces Thus, the total parking requirement for the s~te ~s 133 spaces per the development agreement The
proposed development includes 51 underground spaces, 33 spaces in surface lots and 18 on-street spaces for a total
of l00 spaces The proposal shows 4 handlcap accessible spaces to meet zomng requlrements Commercialusesin
the development will also have access to the existing village lot to the north and existing on-street spaces on
Emerson Street and Busse Avenue
As the site does not meet its parking requirement, the developer will be required to enter into a parking agreement
with a nearby property, or properties, to provide the additional 33 parking spaces
The proposed access to the underground parking would be located between the proposed on-site surface parking
area and the existing Village Hall parking lot The ramp would also serve as access to the underground parking
deck for any potential redevelopment of the Village Hall site The apphcant will be required to provide an access
easement for the developer, residents, and tenants of that development with the Plat of Consolidation for the subject
property
The surface parking lot to the rear of the structure will be connected to the existing Village lot to the north of the
site Maintaining the availability of that lot for customers and visitors to the site, rather than employees and
commuters will be a key issue for the long-term viability of the development The applicant must provide the
Village with an agreement to allow for Village enforcement of a 2-hour parking limit on the lot to ensure that
parking In the lot Is reserved for customers and visitors, as enforced m the existing lot
The proposal includes reconfiguration of the existing Village parking lots south of and west of Village Hall to
accommodate 90" spaces The proposal also lneludas the reconfiguration of the existing, poorly defined parking
area to the rear of the commercial building south of'the Sakura Restaurant The proposal would create a six-space
parking bay in that area
Open Space and Landscaping
The applicant has not submitted prehmmary landscape plans for the proposed development The plans currently
show httle area devoted to landscape The proposal includes primarily hardseape areas surrounding the proposed
structure While the BS-C district does not require setbacks in which landscaping would be required, the apphcant
must submit landscape plans for the site that meet the requirements of Article XXIII and include landscape features
such as planter boxes and sidewalk trees at appropriate locations to soften foundations and accent plaTn areas
Streetscape
The Mount Prospect Streetscape Plan calls for a 20' wide sldewalk/landseape area along Main Street adjacent to the
proposed development The area would consist primarily of paver block sidewalk with the addition of hnear raised
planter boxes planted with street trees and groundeovers The applicant has not submitted plans for this area, but
has setback the building to allow for a minimum 20' sidewalk/landscape area in this location
The Streetseape Program calls for ~ "hard" streetseape for the Northwest Highway and Emerson Street frontages
adjacent to the proposed development The typical segment of"hard" streetscape shown in the Streetscape program
IsJust over 8' in width The appheant has not submitted plans for these areas, but has setback the braiding to allow
for sidewalks ranging from 10' at the narrowest point to over 20' in width at the widest point
The proposed st&walks along the street frontages, both on and off-site, will be financed and maintained by the
Village and must remain open to the public. Provision of easements over these areas will be required with the Plat
of Consohdatlon for the subject property
ZBA 37-99 Downtown Redevelopment Phas~ lB
Meeting of February 24, 2000 ' ~ ~ ,~ '~'~,i ~ ~ ~ ~
Page 5
Mix of Commercial Uses
The Downtown Redevelopment Plan calls for businesses m thc Downtown area to "go beyond the most basic daily
needs of residents (dry cleaners, video rental, etc ), to also include specialty retail businesses (a toy store, hardware
store, etc ) and the types of places that encourage residents meeting and visiting with one another at night and on
weekends 0ce cream store, sit-down restaurants, etc )" The Village needs to ensure that the budding's retail spaces
are not filled up with primarily office uses and personal service uses The ZBA should include a condition that a
the applicant enter into an agreement with the Village to establish a mutually acceptable method of msunng that the
mix of usas in the structure will fulfil the requirements of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan
Review by Other Village Departments:
The Engineering Division has performed a preliminary review of the proposal and identified the following
Development Code requirements to be met for the site
The lots are not currently configured as shown on the plan A Plat of Resubdivlsion will be required to
reconfigure the parcels accordingly The Plat of Subdivision will have to include access and parking
easements as necessary
2 Section 16 405 F The site plan does not show any provisions for stormwater detention The Engineering
Division estimates that, according to the Development Code, approximately 0 8 ac-ft of storage would be
required for this site
3. Perimeter Sidewalk (Section 16 403 A 9) While we understand that sidewalk will be installed around the
perimeter of the site, this sidewalk should be installed within the public right of way or within an easement
granted by the property owner to the Village for the public sidewalk It should also be noted that all
sidewalks to be maintained by the Village must have a minimum clear width (no obstructions) of 6'
4 Permits will be required from the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago and Illinois
Department of Transportation
The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and noted that all surface driveways crossing over underground
parking areas must be engineered to support the Fire Department's heaviest piece ofeqmpment
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for conditional uses are listed in Section 14 203.F.7 of the Village Zoning Ordinance The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a conditional use These standards relate to
n The conditional use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare,
The conditional use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties,
Q Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion
on Village streets, and
o Compliance of the conditional use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Vdlage Ordinances
The Conditional Use request is proposed to fulfil the provisions of thc Village of Mount Prospect Downtown TIF
District Strategic Plan In general, the proposal supports and furthers the goals of the Strategic Plan Subject to
compliance with the conditions of approval, the proposal will comply with the provisions of the Comprehensive
plan and the Zoning Code The proposed development would add a centerpiece and focal point for downtown
redevelopment The development will have a positive effect on nearby properties and stimulate new development
ZBA 37~99 Downtown Redevelopment Phase lB
Meeting of February 24, 2000
Page 6
m the area The development ts destgned to foster pedestrian acttvtty and multtple-use trips and wdl, therefore have
hmtted tmpact on traffic condmons m the wcmtty Thus, the development wdl have hmtted ~mpact on the adjacent
netghborhoods, utthty provts~on or pubhc streets
Planned Unit Developments Standards
Zomng Code Seetton 14 504 C authorizes the Vtllage Board to approve a Planned Umt Development when the
proposed PUD comphes wtth the fol[owtng standards
Except as modtfied by and approved m the final development plan, the proposed development comphes
with regulattons of the dtstnct m which It ts to be located
the proposed PUD Is consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan
that the PUD Is ,n the pubhe interest and ts conststent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance
that the streets have been designed to avoid
· inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD
· -traffic congestion In the streets adjoining the PUD
· an excessive burden on pubhc parks, recreatton areas, schools, and other public faedttles
The proposed development will comply with all Zomng Code reqmrements when all condttions of approval
have been met The proposal Is submttted to further the goals of the Mount Prospect Downtown TIF Dtstnct
Strategm Plan and therefore is conststent wtth the recommendattons of the Comprehensive Plan and is tn the
public interest, as defined by the Goals and Objecttves of the Plan The Purpose statement of the B5 Zoning
District states that "The district Is intended to accommodate retail and specialty shops and business, professional
uses characteristic of a traditional downtown area," and "permits higher densxty multi-famdy residential uses"
The proposed mixed use commemial and residentxal development Is In keeping with that purpose statement
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make posittve findings with respect to the standards for Conditional Uses
m Section 14 203 F 8 and Planned Unit Developments m 14 504 A Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the
proposed Planned Umt Development with the following conditions
1 Development of the site m conformance with the site plan prepared by Haylock Design, Inc, dated
January 31, 2000 (Attachment 1), Basement Garage Plan prepared by Haylock Design, Inc, dated
January 24, 2000 (Attachment 2), and colored elevations prepared by HKM Architects + Planners,
Inc, dated April 26, 1999 (attached)
2 Submission of samples of all proposed building materials and approval of those building materials by
the Village Board
3 Provide a year-round dining area m place of the proposed outside dining area and extend the 2na and
3'a floor living units and the budding fagade over that area
4 The apphcant shall enter into an agreement with the Village of Mount Prospect to ensure that the
tenant m~x of the bmldmg's commemlal space fulfils the requirements of the Downtown
Redevelopment Plan
$ Approval by the Plan Commission and Village Board of a Plat of Subdivlston for the subject
property, including all required easements, prior to issuance ofa bmldtng permit
6 Promston of appropriate agreements to allow for Vdlage enfomement of parking regulations m
surface parking areas
7 Provtslon of appropriate easements to allow for V,IIage mamtenance of streetscape areas on private
property and to ensure pubhc access to streetscape areas
8 Redestgn the parking bay to the rear of the commercial building south of the Sakura Restaurant to
comply wtth staffcomments m the parking sectton of thts report
ZBA 37-99 Downtown Redevelopment Phase IB
Meeting of February 24, 2000 ~ · ~,., , ,~ ,,.; ~ ~
Page 7
9 Submmmon of a final landscape plan meeting all requirements of Article XXIII Landscape Code of
the Vdlage of Mount Prospect Zomng Code and prowd,ng for appropriate foundation planting areas
and landscape features such as tree plantings and rained planter boxes to accent on-mt pedestrian
areas
10 The apphcant shall parhctpate financmlly ~n the design and select,on of approprmte focal pmnts, such
as pubhc art, street furmture, or pubhc gather,ng spaces at the comers of Emerson Street and
Northwest H~ghway and Mare Street and Northwest H~ghway
I ! Submittal and approval of final Engmeenng Plans meeting all Development Code requtrements
and/or approval by the Plan Commmsmn and Vdlage Board of any necessary Development Code
Exceptions
12 Provision of an executed parking agreement w~th a nearby property to provide an ad&t~onal 32
parking spaces to meet the rote parking requirement
13 Submittal of final budding plans meeting all appheable Bu,ld~ng Code and F~re Code requtrements
14 Approval ofapproprmte permas by I D O T. and M W.R D
l Concur,
D~reetor of Commumty Development
H \GEN~LNG~ZBAIZBA 2000~Staff Memos~ZBA-37=99 (Norwood).do¢
Pine Street :: Pine Street
Wille Street
Wille Street
~ Main Street
Emerson Street
Elm Street
The Lofts at Village Centre %* ®
lhe Sho~s at Village Centre
No~w~OOD ~'"~ '"~
2-21-00 N SHORT TERM
I I~, ~ SITE Pb~N
n,,m HAYLOCK DESIGN. Inc.
NEW CONOOMINIUMS'AT ~.
The Lofts at Village Centre
The Shops at Village Centre
2-21-00 N LONG TERH
m m~. ~ 51~ P~N
n;I HAYLOCK DESIGN, Inc.
PAPJ(ING 66RAG~ BU~LDI~ 12
The Lofts at Village Centre
The Shops at Village Centre
? ,
NO,.RWOOD
Ch,cogo #l,nos 606~1 Fox 77,3-775-44~.3 N LONG TERH
~-~,-oo ~ BASEHENT GAP, AGE PLAN
I
I'1,~1 ..~..¢K.=s.~.,..~.
PrelmunaruPlant Matenal Palette
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
26 0
CASE NO. ZBA-37-99 ' Hearing Date February 24,
PETITIONER: Bruce Adream, Norwood Budders
SUBJECT PROPERTY: Northwest H~ghway between Emerson St and Ma~ St
PUBLICATION DATE: February 9, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Conditional Use for a PUD to Permit Construction of a Mixed-use Development
.1
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten ~
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
' Kc:th Youngqmst ~
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: M~ehael Blue, AICP, D~puty Director of Commumty Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES:~ Bruce Adream, Norwood Builders
J~m Duerr, Norwood Builders
Ron Radz~k, Norwood Builders
~ ~ · Matthew Haylock, Haylock Design
Kathryn and Mauro Bruno
~ Chairperson Arlene Juraeek called the meeting to order at 7.35 p m Minutes of the Januar~ 27, 2000 meeting were
approved, with one abstention by Arlene Juraeek Ms. Juraeek announced the postponement of Case ZBA-04-2000
until the meeting of March 23, 2000 The Board heard Case ZBA-37-99 at 7 39 p m
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the ~tem, a proposal to construct a structure contaimng
22,700 sq i~ of commercial space and 34 condominium umts, a 32 on-site surface parking spaces, 18 on-street spaces
and 51 underground spaces Based on a Request for Proposals issued last year In support of the Downtown Strategic
Plan, the Village Board selected the apphcant as the developer for Phase IB of Downtown redevelopment - a mixed-
use development on Northwest Highway m the downtown Phase IA, consisting of 205 condomlmums and a pubhe
~ parkin, g lot, was approved, m 1999 and is currently under constroet~on
Mr. Perkins described the subject property, a vacant parcel on Northwest Highway betwee~ Main Street and Emerson
~ Street, and added that the Village has acquired the property and has a development agreement with the applicant for
the purchase and development o_f the property.
Mr. Perkins stated that the proposed development would consist of 22,700 gross square fee~ of commercial space on
the ground floor and a total of 34 condominium units on the second and third floor He stated that the s~te would be
served by 51 parking spaces in an underground garage beneath the principal structure, 33 surface spaces on the site,
and 18 on-street spaces to be created with the development ,
Mr Perkins stated that the site Is zoned BSC central Commercial Core district, that "Planned umt developments,
mixed commercial and residential" are listed as Conditional Uses in the district and that the proposed maxed-use
development may be permitted in'the zoning district following approval of the PUD as a Conditional Use
Zomng Board of Appeals .... ~: ~ ~ ~ ZBA-37-99
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson - Page 2
He then smd that the apphcant had submitted revised plans addressing some of the comments included in the staff
report and distributed cop~es of revised plans to the ZBA ~ ~ ~
Mr Perkins described the proposed development's braiding setbacks, density, and building height and stated that the
proposal meets Zoning C?de, requirements for t~hose~ items ~ : ~ ~
Mr Perkins then described the applicant's submitted elevations and contrasted them w~th the elevations ~ncluded in the
applicant's response to the Village's R F P. He also described a proposed outdoor dining area to thYnorth of the
Emerson Street fagade and gave staff's poslt~on that the area would better reflect the original proposal and be better
'utilized as a semi-enclosed dming area allowing for use o'f the area most of the year, rather than just in the summer
He then stated Village staff's other concerns w~th the proposed elevations that the proposed building materials lack
the degree of contrast shown In the RFP elevations, that much of the architectural detail has been ehmmated for the
bullthng roof He added that Staff has met with the applicant to discuss those ~ssues and bmldmg materials to be used
at the site, and that the applicant agreed to address staff concerns and ~dentify braiding materials prior to Vdlage Board
consideration
Mr Perkins described parking for the site He stated that the total parking requirement for the site would be 135 paces
and a total of 102 spaces are currently proposed He added that, because the site does not h~et ~ts parking
reqmrement, the developer must enter into a parking agreement w~th a nearby property or properties to pr?v~de the
additional 33 parking spaces He also spoke about the ~mportance of keeping parking on and around the ~te available
for customers and ws~tors to the s~te, rather than employees and com~muters and recommended requiring the apphcant
to provide the Village with an agreement to allow for Village enforcem~ ent of parking time limits He also des?bed
changes to the emstmg Village parking lots south of and w?t ,of Vi?age Hall that would accompany the development
Mr Perkins rewewed the applicant's prelumnary landscape plans for the development He stated that the plans
include primarily hardscape areas with small planting areas along the EImhurst Road and Emerson Street frontages and
that the plans follow the reqmrements of the Mount Prospect Streetscape' Plafi between the buildings and the edge of
pavement He added that Village staff ~s working with the developer to find an appropriate focal point, ~n the form of
landscaping, public art, street furu~ture, or som6 combination of those elements for the corner of NorthweSt H~ghway
and Emerson Street ' ' ~ ~ .......
Mr Perkins described prows~ons m the Downtown Redevelopment Plan cathng for,specialty retail businesses and
, businesses w~th mght and weekend act~wty He added that the applicant and Village staff are working to establish a
mutually aecet~table method of ensunng that the mix ~of commercml uses in the structure will fulfil the requirements of
the Plan .... ~ ~
Mr Perkins then briefly thseussed the request in terms of Zoning Code Standards for Planned Unit Developments and
Conditional Uses and gave Staff's recommendation for apl~roval of the pt:opos&d Planned Umt Development, w~th the
condit~ons included ~n the staff report ~ ,
Ms Jurueek asked ~fBoard members had any questions for Jeff and asked if required pubhc notme had been g~ven for
the ~tem Mr Parkms stated that notme in the form ora newspaper legal ad, mailed notices, and signs had been g~ven
Ms Juracek then asked ~fthe petitioner wanted to speak , ~ . , . ~ ~ , ~ ,
Bruce Adream, Jim Duerr, Ron Radzlk, and Matthew Haylock were sworn In Mr Adream stated this development
would be the gateway to Mount Prospect and that the initial rendering was submitted with the hope of being chosen for
the project He sa~d he ~s impressed with Village staff on the timely aeqmsmon of the property and site preparation
He stated that, m further work with staff and the architect, they have prepared a new rendering, which Is before the
Board tonight He responded to comments that the latest renderings were boring He sa~d that on the new design,
some colors are d~fferent and no Drywt will be used, also that the final project may have dlfferen~ brick colors based
on avaflabthty. The new rendering has some deletions and softie imp{dvements over the original He approached the
easel to point out the d~fferences. He said that m order to make the project more pedestrian friendly and increase
ws~billty to the interior stores, they had ~neluded outdoor dining, for which they have received many favorable
Zomng Board of Appeals ZBA-37-99
Arlene Juracek, Chmrperson ~ ~ ~ ( '~ Page 3
comments He pointed out changes m the original brick arches whmh would be more expe~sive than the original
drawings but more symmetrical and similar to those used for shops in France or England The bmld~ng will be 52'
high at the peak because each floor Is more than 10' h~gh and the apartments would have h~gher cethngs as they wdl be
called "the lofts of~dlag6 Centre'~. ~He said they are willing to add~ any faux chimneys, weathervanes, ere, as desired
Mr Rogers asked about the poss~bd~ty of eliminating dorn~ers Mr Ronald Redz~k of Norwood Bmlders came
forward to say the dormers were necessary as they would be active skyllghts'whmh wSuld provide hght to the loft
condos Ms Juraeek said she would like to see the plan include the original faux chimneys
Mr Adreanl said more color could be provided by using d~fferent color awnings and that b~dding materials would be
submitted for final approval Mr Adream also smd Norwood would help wtth fund rinsing for a focal feature for the
area
With reference to the condlt~ohs recommended by Staff, Mr. Adreani asked that HKM Architects be deleted from
staffs condmons and replaced by Haylock He asked that the outdoor dining area concept be allowed to remain Mr
Adrean~ stated they would be very wfihng to work with the Vffiage on selecting a tenant mtx and that Norwood would
be amenable to working with ~staff on parking lot redesign He also said Norwood would contact Bank One and
various area churches regarding the avallablhty of parking spaces ~n their lots W~th reference to staffs condition #9,
Mr Adream d~reeted the Board's attention to the chart of landscape materials they had prepared for the project He
stated Norwood would work w~th the Village regarding brick pavers and outdoor furmture to be used for a focal point
Engineering plans are not finahzed, Mr Adream said they are working with the d~fferent government agenetes on the
approval of those
Ms Juraeek asked about the nature of permits Mr Adream said they would provide the sewer and water runoff and
drainage of the parkmg area design to MWRD for permits Ms Juraeek said the stte elevations and material ehmces
seem tentative and would budding samples be ready for submission to the Village Board qmekly Mr Adreani
reminded the Board about the bnek shortage and said Norwood works with many companies and will have a display at
the property site
Michael Blue, Deputy D~reetor of Commumty Development, stated that there were bnek problems with the other
developments being built by Norwood He agreed ~t is a challenge to get the bricks, but It also is important to know If
~ the bricks and other materials to be used are available Mr. Blue said that as part of its recommendation the ZBA
should decide whmh elevation they prefer so Norwood can bnng It to the Village B?ard w~th defimte materials
Ms Juraeek smd she liked the original design because of the variety of materials used She said she d~d not want the
proposed development to be the same color brick throughout the project and not the s~ame color as the Clocktower
Condominiums Ms Juracek also noted the importance of striping the Northwest H~ghway on-street parking spaces
Mr Rogers suggested substituting pre-cast concrete panels with the appearance of bricks for the brick, as shown ~n the
original proposal He also stated h~s feehng that the original elevation was desirable s~nee ~t was more "fanciful" and
had more variety m the roof hne Mr Rodgers indicated h~s desire that there by no Dryvtt materml on the building He
had no issue w~th the Mam Street end of the building being octagonal (a change from rounded ~n the original) and
approved of shortening the Emerson Street fagade in order to open up the courtyard Mr Rodgers ind~eated that his
main concerns were that there be sufficient variety in the color and texture of the constmetmn materials
Mr. Adrean~ smd that type of concrete panel Mr Rodgers suggested was usually used for industrial and office
bmldtngs Mr Rogers noted it ~s olden used for Chmago rowhouses to prowde more variety ~ Mr Adreani also said he
would prefer using brick in d~fferent colors for variety Mr Adream also smd the comer of Northwest H~ghway and
Main Street had been redesigned in the rewsed elevatton m order to be symmetrical with the one at Emerson
Mr Rogers said smooth and masonry surfaces should be utilized and roofs should be thfferent types Mr. Adream said
white, rough-faced or Renaissance stone would prowde a hghter look, and that they would go back to eolonng board
to prowde more variety
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-37-99
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ~, ~ ~ ~ Page 4
Ke~th Youngqmst said he had served on the original Ad Hoc Committee and that committee h~d been very excited
about the original'drawings for the downto~vn area, which were provided by Norwood Builders However he
understood that they were conceptual and m~ght change somewhat Mr Youngqmst sa~d the clumney removal ~s
satisfactory to him and he said the dormer utilization was a great ~dea He said h~s preference would be to hold down
~the numbeFof changes of matenals~and ~olors to four or five,~ and to avoid a 'circus'~ appearance by keeping long
expanses of the various materials He asked if the wing show6 on the Emerson elevatmn of the drawing was an attempt
to continue around the corner
Mr Adre~nl said that was a first floor commercial extension only Mr Perkins smd the first floor of the bmldmg
actually extends out a few more feet and the building steps back on the second floor This is an extension of the
eommereial space in the rear - allowing for larger and more usable spaces Mr Adrea, m pointed out that it will be
important for renting the spaces (and the viability or,he businesses) to ensure VlSlblhty to the rear~.
Mr' Youngqmst stied the original plans looked beautiful from Northwest Highway and he was glad to see Norwood ~s
carrying the exact level detail around bull&ng, and he wanted to compliment them for that' He said pre-cast slabs, as
suggested by Mr Rogers, would be good for creating va~rlet~ in the facade Mr Younqmst smd he has no problem
with the absence bf faux chimneys and weathervanes
Michael Bluff smd N6rwood employs a third party broker as part of the rental process and they have agreed that the
Village will have and opportunity to meet with the broker
Ms Juracek said we would not want only resta~Ur~gnts but ,other types of businesses Mr Adream agreed.
q Leo Floros asked if there would be single stores going all the way through the building and If any of the stores might
be offices Mr Adream said the comer stores would probfibly go through but the others would be stores facing
Northwest Highway and backed up by a common corridor, with another set of stores facing the courtyard He smd
there would be fifteen or sixteen stores In the braiding ~ 1
Mr Blue remarked that storefronts on parking lot side likely would not be of the same ~ahber as on the Northwest
Highway side ~ The stores facing the street would be businesses that require more vislbfllty' Therefore, it was
reasonable to expect offices o'r some service busine~ses on the courtyard side
:Adrean~l said they had considered the i,dea of l~ger stores but the best retail use is smaller,~easier to rent, stores ~; c~
Mr Rogers said he agreed with the outdoor d~mng concept as it would give mbre visibility tb the stores facing the
courtyard
Merrill Cotten satd h~ considered the question to be whether we wan~ the development to be more quaint, as m the
original renderings, or more modem day, like the new dra~vmgs He asked ff we wanted to be more like Long Grove
~br have a more distinctive look He,added that using different brick cnlors would glv? a yery desirablehppearance
Ms Juracek said we were not striving to look like another Long Grove but we do like variety She also noted that the
project should not look like a building bmlt at one time, but like buildings built at different times She said symmetry
. is important, but the facade s~h~ould not look like a monbhth She suggested the builder vary the color? a~nd architecture
as much as possible
Keith Youngqmst asked how water runoff would be handled Mr Adreant said that there will be a flat roof in the
middle of the buildings with ~ntcnor drains connected to thc storm sewer system and a gutter system along outside
area He hlso stated that tras,,h storage will be in in, door dumpsters, ,w,hich W~lll be taken out through the rear of the
bmldlng ' ~
Ms Juracek asked ~fthere were any more quesuon~ or any questions from the audience There being none, she closed
the Pubbc Hearing at 8 42 and asked for d~scuss~on by the Zoning Board Ms Juracek smd th~s proposal meets the
needs of the Village and has had a lot of pre-planning and a lot of groundwork by many people She sa~d we had heard
much discussion about staffs recommendations particularly recommendation #3, whtch pertains to an outdoor dm~ng
area She said Mr Youngqmst and Mr Rogers have both made persuasive statements In support of the pet~tloner's
wew that vts~bllity ~s crttmal to tenants Ms Juracek said he would support that wew and suggested removal of
condition #3
Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for a Condmonal Use to allow the proposed Planned Umt
Development w~th the conditions included in the staff report, w~th the ebm~nauon of condition 3 and the add~Uon of
the word "general" before the word "conformance" in condition 1. Keith Youngqmst- seconded the motion
UPON ROLL CALL' AYES Cotten, Floros, Rogers, Youngqmst, and Juracek
NAYS None
Motion was approved 5-0
At 9 25 p m, after two other cases were beard, R~chard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Ke~th
Youngqmst The motion was approved by voice vote and the meeting was adjourned
Barbara Sw~atek, Pl~nmng Secretary
w~l/
5~00
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE NATURE
OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS PHASE lB OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT
AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND MAIN STREET
WHEREAS, Norwood Budders (hereinafter referred to as Pet~tioner), has filed a petition for
a Conditional Use En the nature of a Planned Umt Development with respect to property
generally known as the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street, Phase lB
of downtown redevelopment) (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property ~s legally described as follows
Lots 6-10, ~ncluswe, m Block 13 m Busse and Wdle's Resubd~ws~on m Mount Prospect,
~n the West half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Pnnc~pal
Mend~an, and the West 22' of Lot 8 and all of Lots 9 and 10 En Mount Prospect
SubdMsion of part of the NW¼ North of railroad m the NE¼ of Sect[on 12, Township 41
North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Mend[an, according to the plat thereof
recorded September 2, 1874 as Document Number 188460, all m Cook County, Ilhno~s,
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner desires to create a Planned Unit Development prewd~ng for the
construction of a m~xed-use structure containing 22,700 sq ft of commercial space, and
34 condominium units, with th,rty-two (32) on-s~te surface parking spaces, eighteen (18)
on-street spaces, and fifty-one (51) underground parking spaces, as prev~ded ~n Section
14 904 and Section 14 502 of the V~llage Code, and
WHEREAS, a Pubhc Heanng was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit,
designated as ZBA Case No. 37-99, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Vdlage of
Mount Prospect on the 24th day of February, 2000, pursuant to due and proper not~ce
thereof having been pubhshed ~n the Mount Prosoect Daily Herald on the 9th day of
February, 2000, and
WHEREAS, the Zomng Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation
to the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount Prospect have
considered the request being the subject of ZBA 37-99 and has determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting to the Subject
Property the Conditional Use ~n the nature of a Planned Umt Development as requested
~n ZBA 37-99
Page 2 of 3
Norwood, Phase lB
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE, PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE. That the recitals set forth here~nabove are ~ncorporated here~n as findings
of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect
SECTION TVVO. That the Conditional Use m the nature of a Planned Unit Development
being the subject of this Ordinance is subject to the following cond~bons
1. Development of the site ~n conformance w~th the s~te plan prepared by ~aylock
Design, Inc, dated January 31, 2000 (Attachment 1), Basement Garage Plan
prepared by Haylock Design, Inc, dated January 24, 2000 (Attachment 2), and
colored elevations prepared by HKM Architects + Planners, Inc, dated Apnl 26, 1999
(attached)
2 Submission of samples of all proposed building matenals and approval of such
building matenals by the V~llage Board
3 Provide a year-round d~nmg area ~n place of the proposed outside d~n~ng area, and
extend the second and third floor I~wng un~ts and the budding fac..ade over that area
4 The apphcant shall enter ~nto an agreement w~th the Vdlage of Mount Prospect to
ensure that the tenant m~x of the budd~ng's commercial space fulfils the requirements
of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan
5 Approval by the Plan Commission and Vdlage Board of a Plat of Subdlws~on for the
subject property, including all required easements, pnor to Issuance of a budding
permit
6 Prows~on of appropnate agreements to allow for Vdlage enforcement of parking
regulabons m surface parking areas
7. Prows~on of appropriate easements to allow for V~llage maintenance of streetscape
areas on private property and to ensure pubhc access to streetscape areas
8 Redesign the parking bay to the rear of the commercial budding south of the Sakura
Restaurant (105 S Main Street) to comply w~th staff comments ~n the parking section
of th~s report
9 Submission of a final landscape plan meebng all requirements of Article XXIII
Landscape Code of the V~llage of Mount Prospect Zoning Code and providing for
appropnate foundabon planbng areas and landscape features such as tree planbngs
and raised planter boxes to accent on-s~t pedestnan areas
10 The applicant shall participate financially ~n the design and select~on of appropriate
focal points, such as pubhc art, street furniture, or pubhc gathering spaces at the
corners of Emerson Street and Northwest H~ghway and Ma~n Street and Northwest
H~ghway ~..~
Page 3 of 3
Norwood, NW Hwy & Ma~n
11 Submittal and approvat of final Eng~neenng Plans meebng all Development Code
requirements and/or approval by the Plan Commission and Wllage Board of any
necessary Development Code Excepbons
12 Prows~on of an executed parking agreement w~th a nearby property to prowde an
add~bona132 parking spaces to meet the s~te parking requirement
13 Submittal of final building plans meebng all apphcable Budding Code and Rre Code
requirements
14 Approval of appropriate permits by I D O.T. and M W R D
~LO~L~I~ Th~s Ordinance shall be ~n full force and effect from and after ~ts
passage, approval and publlcabon m pamphlet form in the manner prowded by law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED th~s day of ,2000
Gerald L Farley
Vdlage President
ATTEST
Velma W. Lowe
Vdlage Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO MICHAEL E JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE MARCH 17, 2000
SUBJECT. PC-01-2000/DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTIONS FOR STORM WATER
DETENTION AND STREET LIGHTS
301 S I-OKA AVENUE
ST RAYMOND'S PARISH
The pet~tioner, St Raymond's Parish, ts tn the process of expanding its facility at the area bounded by L~ncoln
Street, Mllburn, I-Oka, and Elmhurst Avenues and must meet all applicable code reqmrements The petttioner is
seeking rehef from Vdlage Development Code requirements for storm water detention and streethght installation
The Plan Commisston met xn regular sesston on Mamh 1 and March 15, 2000 and dtscussed the petmoner's
requests for development code exceptions
The Plan Commission transmits their recommendation to approve an exception to the Development Code
requirement for storm water detention and allow the petitioner to provide storm water detentton for the proposed
addition only In addition, there was a desire to have the petitioner work with Vdlage staff to amve at a corridor
improvement design that screens the petitioner's parking lot along Elmhurst Road/Ri 83 Plan Commission cxted
recent improvements to other sites with sigmficant existing development that were required to prowde detention
for the new ~mprovements only and the condmon of this s~te as reasons for approval Granting the requested
exception for St Raymond's would be consistent with these other decisions
In addit~on, the Plan Commission recommends denial of the request for an exception to the Development Code
requirement to install streethghts The Plan Commmsion recommends that, to be consistent with previous Vffiage
pohcy regarding unprovements required for new developments, the petitioner record a covenant agreeing to pay
for the installation and streethght standards when the Village determines that new streethghts are necessary for
the property and surrounding neighborhood
The Plan Commission continued the case from March 1, 2000 so that sewer capacity issues could be researched tn
more detail On March 15, the Plan Comrmsston voted 5-0 to approve the petmoner's request to provide storm
water detention only for the proposed addition and voted 5-0 to deny the petitioner's request not to install
streethghts Furthermore, the Plan Commission voted 5-0 to approve the petitioner recording a covenant agreeing
to pay for the installation of new streethght standards when the Village determines streethghts are necessary for
the property and surrounding area In addltaon the Plan Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the petitioner
work with the Village to create a corridor enhancement design that screens the petltmner's parking lot in a manner
that is consistent with the proposed Corridor Gmdelmes
Wflham J (~ooney, AIC1}
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
' March 15, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Comm~ssmn was called to order by Chmrman
Mmhael Zadel at 7.30~p m at the Vdlagc Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect,
Ilhno~s
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call: Michael Zadel, Chmrman
Gary Grouwink~el
~ ' Edwin Janus
William Reddy
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Antoinette Astrmdes
' ~ Frank Boege
Louis Velasco
Village Staff Present: , , Judy C~onnolly, AICP, Planner
Others in Attendance: ~ Robert Bush
Ed Dowhng
Tom George
Mark Lattner
~ Janice Stone
Gerry Stone
Ben Trapam
Nancy Uxa '
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chamffan Zadel opened the meeting and asked for comments on minutes from March 1, 2000
As there were none, Bill Reddy moved to approve the minutes and Carol Tortorello seconded the
motion The motmned carried 5-0
SUBDMSIONS: ~
NONE
OLD BUSINESS:
Development Code Exceptions - St Raymond's Parish/301 S I-Ok~t
Chmrman Zadel asked Judy Connolly to recap the events for the previous meetln~ and summmze
the petitioner's request Ms Connolly smd that St Raymond's Parish ~s in the process of
expanding ~ts facility and has to meet current code requirements She smd the pet~tmner appeared
before the Plan Commission at the March 1 meeting, seeking relief from Development Code
requirements for storm water detention and streethgh~t installatmn and the ?ase was continued to
th~s meeting '
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of March 1, 2000 Meeting Page 2
Ms Connolly said that St Raymond's Is required to provide ~detention for the whole site because
the proposed addition is ~ new development, per Development Code requirements The petitioner
proposes to provide storm water detentmn for the new structures only and would like to modify
the parking lot along Elmhurst Road/Route 83 so the parking lot wdl store water on-site She said
that Engmeenng reviewed the request and found that the design would not increase the amount of
dzscharge into the combined sewers Ms Connolly said that the case was continued until the
pehtioner s engineer could docu~nent that the I-Oka Axle sewer was able to handle additional run-
off generated from the new impervious surface She said that JKL, the petitioner's engineering
firm, submitted calculations to staff last week and that the Engmeemlg Division reviewed the
petitioner's request, including the information from JKL, and continues to ,find that the
development will not create flooding problems for the neighboring properties
Ms Connolly presented tbe petitioner's second request from the Development Code, to not install
the required streethghts She said that the exlstlng streethghts are on CornEd poles and on the
petitioner's property Ms Connolly said that according to the Development Code, the existing
CornEd hghts would be replaced with aluminum standard poles and would be placed at the
intersections and mid-block where necessary Ms Connolly said that the current lighting sources
were on private property or owned by ComEd and that the Vlllage could not guarantee that the
hght source would always be available ~lthough the existing hghtulg is consistent with the
amount of hghtlng in the neighborhood, the source does not meet Development Code standards
She said that the petitioner fee s that there is sufficient lighting at tle site now and does not want
to install new hgbts She said tbat the petitioner's request does not meet the standards for a
hardship and that granting the exception would be inconsistent with previous Village policy when
oilier petitioner's sought relief from this requirement Therefore, staff recommends denial of the
petitioner's request for an exception to Development Code requirements for streethghts At a
minimum, the petitioner could record a co?nant agreeing to pay for the installation and fixtures
if the Village determines that streethghts are necessary
Ms Connolly said that the project also presents~ the Village with an opportunity to incorporate
corridor improvements along Elmhurst Road/Rt 83 The improvements could be a combination
of landscaping and new fencing to screen the parking lot and enhance the Rt 83 corridor She
said a landscape easement along the east side of the parking lot was not required for approval of
the storm water detention exception request but that the request would be in keeping with the
proposed Comdor Guidelines She said that providing detention only for the new impervious
surface would be consistent with previous projects that included expansion of an existing facility
Therefore, staff recommends approval of the petitioner's request for an exception to the
Development Code's storm water detention requirements and recommends that the petitioner
work with the Vdlage to arrive at a parking lot design/screening that enhances Elmhurst Road/Rt
83 in a manner that is consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines
Ms Connolly said that representatives from St Raymond's were in the audience to answer Plan
Commission's questions and that Chuck Lindelofofthe Village Engineering Division was also iii
attendance if the Plan Commission had questl~ons about the storm water detention design ,
'Chairman Zadel asked,if the Plan Commission,members had any questions ,There was
discussion that the additional information about the sewer capamt~' was very thorough and useful
The consensus was that the calculations documented the mlmmal impacts of the project and
provided the Village with more than adequate "leeway" to approve the Development Code
exception for drainage
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of March 1, 2000 Meeting Page 3
There was d~seussmn about the amount of space avadable to screen the parking lot and the
locatmn of the landscaping on private property Ben Trapam smd that the petmoner supports
screemng the parking lot and ts agreeable to working w~th the Vdlage to create a corridor
enhancement for the area along Elmhurst Road/Rt 83
Bill Reddy moved to approve the exceptton to the Development Code and have the pettt~oner
provide storm water detentton for the new ~mpervtous surfaces only Carol Tortorello seconded
the morton and the motion carried 5-0
Ball Reddy moved to deny the Development Code exceDt~on to not install the reqmred streethghts
and have the pet~ttoner record a covenant to pay for the mstallatton of new street hghts ff the
Vdlage determines the hghtmg ts necessary Carol Tortorello seconded the morton and the
morton camed 5-0
Ball Reddy moved to approve that the pet~tmner work wtth the Village to arnve at a parktng lot
design ustng landscape screening that enhances Elmhurst Road/Rt 83 m a manner that ts
conststent w~th the proposed Corndor Design Gmdehnes Ed Janus seconded the morton and the
morton carned 5-0
NEW BUSINESS.
NONE
COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS:
Vdlage Hall Ad hoc Committee
Chatrman Zadel satd that the Mayor requested a representative from the Plan Commtsston to
participate tn the new Vdlage Hall study There was &scuss~on about a comprehensive mumetpal
famhty and how the budding would benefit various commumty groups Plan Commtsston
presented thmr expectations ora new facfltty tn comparison to the emst~ng Village Hall and Bank
I braiding Chatrman Zadel explained that he was very famdmr wtth and knowledgeable about
the structure of the extstmg Vdlage Hall because of h~s former position at Public Works
Chatrman Zadel satd that he worked on the Village Hall plumbmg tn addttton to matntaimng
other facets of the buddtng He satd that tt was apparent even when the Vdlage first oeeupted the
structure that the bmldmg reqmred stgnificant tmprovement Carol Tortorello moved that
Chatrman Zadel represent the Plan Commtssmn on the Village Hall Ad Hoe Commtttee Ball
Reddy seconded the motton and the morton camed 5-0 Mr Reddy requested that Ms Tortorello
be the alternate representattve tf Chatrman Zadel was unable to attend a meeting Ed Janus
requested that the Plan Commtsston recetve not~ficatmn of the ad hoe meetmgs because the other
members may want to attend the meetings The Plan Commtsston agreed wtth both suggesttons
and d~scussed the progress of the downtown redevelopment
Btll Reddy moved to adjourn the meeting and Ed Janus seconded the motion The motton carried
5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 8 I0 p m
- J~d,th M 'C~o~a~Olly, .~IlJP; Planner y
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
March 1, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to orde~ by Chamnan
Michael Zadel at 7 32 p m at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect,
Ilbnms
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call: M~ehael Zadel, Chmnnan
Antoinette Astre~des
Gary Grouwlnkel (7.45 p ~m )
Edwin Janus
Wflham Reddy
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Frank Boege
~ Louis Velaseo
Village Staff Present: ' 'M~chael Blue, AICP, Deputy D~reetor of Community Development
Judy Connolly, AICP, Planner
Misty D~, Planner
Others in Attendance: Robert Bush
Ed Dowhng
Craig Famswort~
Tom George
M~ke Hfldebrant
Mark Lattner
Don McLean ~
Jamce Stone ~
Gerry Stone
Ben Trapan: " ~
Nancy Uxa
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ~
Chairman Zadel opened the meeting and asked for comments on minutes from November 17,
1999 and December 1, 1999 As there were none, Bill Reddy moved to approve the minutes from
November 17 and Carol Tortorello seconded the motion The motioned earned 4-0 w~th M~chael
Zadelabstaming Ton~e Asteneds moved to appmve the minutes from December 1, 1999andEd
Janus seconded the motion The motioned carried 4-0 w~th Bill .Reddy abstatnmg
SUBDMSIONS:
NONE
OLD BUSINESS: ~ ~ ' ' '
NONE ~
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of March I, 2000 Meeting Page 2
NEW BUSINESS , ~
Development Code Exceptions - St Ravmond's Parish/301 S I-Oka
Chmrmau Zadel Introduced the first item of business and asked Judy Connolly to present an
overview of the case, PC-01-2000 Ms Connolly said that St Raymond's Parish is in the process
of expanding ItS famhty and IS subJect to current code reqmrements She said the petltmner IS In
the lmtml stages of applying for a building permit and ts seeking rehef from Development Code
reqmrements for storm water detention and streethght installation
Ms Connolly reviewed the storm water detention exception first She said that the Development
Code recognizes St Raymond's proposed addmon as a new development and requires detention
for the whole site The petitioner proposes to provide storm water detentmn for the new
structures only The petitioner would like to modify the parking lot along Elmhurst Road/Route
83 so the parking lot will store water on-site and not increase the amount of discharge into the
combined sewers She said that the proJect also presents the Village with an opportunity to
incorporate corridor improvements along Elmhurst Road/Ri 83 The improvements could be a
combination of landscaping and new fencing to screen the parking lot and enhance the Rt 83
corndor She said a landscape easement along the east side of the parking lot was not required
for approval of the storm water detention exception request but that the request would be m
keeping with the proposed Corridor Guidelines She said that providing detention for the new
impervious surface only would be consistent with previous proJects that included expansion of an
existing faclhty Therefore, staff recommends approval of the petitioner's request for an
exception to the Development Code's storm water detention requirements
Ms Connolly discussed the second part of the case, the petitioner's request to not install
streethghts, as ts reqmred by the Development Code She said that the petitioner feels that there
ts sufficient lighting at the site now and does not want to install new hghts Ms Connolly said
that although the extstmg hghtmg ~s consistent with the amount of hghttng tn the neighborhood,
the source does not meet Development Code standards She said that the existing streethghts are
on CornEd poles and on the petitioner's property According to the Development Code, the
existing CornEd hghts would be replaced with aluminum standard poles and would be placed at
the intersections and mid-block where necessary Ms ConnoIly said that the current lighting
sources were on private property or owned by ComEd and that the Village could not guarantee
that the light source would always be available She said that the petitioner's request does not
meet the standards for a hardship and that granting the exception would be inconsistent with
previous Village pohcy when other petitioner's sought rehef from this requirement Therefore,
staff recommends dental of the petmoner's rec~uest for an exception to Development Code
reqmrements for streethghts At a minimum, the petitioner could record a covenant agreeing to
pay for the installation and fixtures ffthe Vdlage determines that streethghts are necessary
Ms Connolly said that representatives from St Raymond's were in the audience to answer Plan
Commission's questions and that Chuck Llndelof of the Village Engineering Division was also tn
at?ndance if the Plan Commission had questions about the storm water detention design ' ~,
The Plan Commission asked for clarification on the storm water detention design Mr Lindelof
reviewed the Development Code regulations relevant to the project He said that increasing the
amount of discharge to the Elmhurst Avenue sewer, decreasing the rate of discharge to the sewer
from the parking lot, and storing water tn the parking lot, would not impact the overall sewer
system Mr. Lmdelof said that no more than eight inches of water would be stored tn the
"poohng-area" of the parking lot and that the proposed design meets code He said that the
parking lot's current elevation changes appear mtmmal because the changes are spread over the
MOUNT PROSPFCT PLAN COMMISSION ~ ~ '
Minutes ol March I, 2000 Meeting Page 3
length of the parking lot and that the ex~sting topography ~s conducive to the petitioner's proposal
Plan Commission asked about the addmonal mn-off that would result from increased nnpervtous
surface at the chui'cb site tn relation to a reduction of green space Mr L~ndelof smd that there
would be sufficient storage tn the parking lot to off-set the addmonal run-offcreated by the new
impervious surfaces Plan Commission asked about the impacts on the adjacent neighbors and
smd they were concerned that the ex~st~ng capacity of the I-Oka sewer, the sewer tn closest
proximity to the addition, may not adequately handle the add~tional run-off. They said they were
concerned that the neighbors would get water on their property If the sewer backed up Mr
Ltndelof said that past experience has shown that IDO'Ps sewer 0n Route 83) which the l-Oka
sewer empties into, has occasion to back-up, However, the petitioner's design would not
aggravate the s~tuatlon · ~, ~ ~ ,
The Plan Commission said they were not comfortable makmg a decision on the storm water
detention exception without knowing the I-Oka Avenue sewer capacity and impacts on the
neighboring properties from the additional mn-off In the church area -As the petitioner's
engmeenng representative did not have this information, there was discussion about reseamhing
the Plan Commission's question and continuing the case to the next meeting Ben Trapam
explained the petmoner's tight timetable and asked that, smce the design was reviewed and
approved by the Village's Engtneenng Division, that the Plan Commission make a demston
tomght The Plan Comrmss~on said that they needed more reformation about the sewer capacity
to make a demslon about the Development Code exception request and Bill Reddy moved to end
the discussion at th~s time and to continue further discussion of PC-01-2000 at the March 15,
2000 Plan Commission meeting Tome Astenedes seconded the motion and the motion carried 6-
0 Mike Blue asked the Plan Commission if there were other questions or issues for the petmoner
to research for the next meeting Chairman Zadel polled the Plan Commission The capacity
issue was the only issue that had to be researched for the next meeting, and the Plan Commission
would be supportive of the petitioner recording a covenant to pay for the streethghts at a later
date lftbe Village determined that the lights were necessary
Corridor Design Gmdehnes o prehmmary designs
Chairman Zadel ~ntroduced the next item of business and asked Judy Connolly to summarize the
status of the project Ms Connolly said that the Plan Commission toured the corridors with the
consulting group, Wolff Clements & Associates and Graf/X m early December Based on that
tour and their own research, the consultants presented preliminary findings and corridor
conditions at the January 25~' Committee of the Whole meeting Mike Blue said the purpose of
tomght's presentation was to give the consultants feedback on their preliminary conceptual
designs He sald the consultants would revise the concepts according to tonight's discussion Mr
Blue said that the Plan Commission was invited to the March 28t~ Committee of the Whole
meeting and that the consultants would present concept designs for Village Board and Plan
Commission review
Frank Clements introduced hls associates, Cratg Famsworth and Don McLean, of Graf/X
Corporation Mr McLean presented preliminary sign and banner concepts He explained the
thought process behind the designs and said that colors m the sign could be modified He satd
that the revised stgn would have a greater emphasts on "Mount" to dtstlngmsh Mount Prospect
from neighboring commumt~es The Plan Commission said that they agreed with the d~rection of
the concepts There was discussion that the "picture" banners would be umque and help
d~fferentlate the village from other commumttes while promotmg local activities and reflect the
seasons or other events
MOUNT PROSPECr PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes o! March I, 2000 Me~tmg
Page 4
Mr Farnsworth presented reformation about the focus area~ '~He sa~d that the sae m relation to
entry/exa to the Village and the' amount of space avadable determines the'level of ~mprovement
In some areas there'was more space available and allowed for a more elaborate sign o~' gateway
feature Mr Farnsworth presented several Iocattons for new s~gns and explmned how existing
s~gn locations could be modified His presentation Included examples of possible Iow-lying wall
designs, landscaped areas;and ~mprovements in the median" The main idea was that the signs,
enhancement features, and landscape would be dsfferent throughout the Village, dependtng upon
the amount of land available, the topography of the area and the relationship to entry into the
Village The improvements would be constructed ofslmdar materials or incorporate elements of
the sign presented by Mr McLean Therefore, the Vdlage had flexibility in making corridor
improvements as budget constraints, redevelopment, or new businesses opportunities were
presented, while still implementing unified corridor improvements
The Plan Commission agreed with the constl tants' designs with minor changes and ideas for
improvement to partmular sites
Sub-recipient Momtonng Plan (CDBG) '
Chatrman Zadel asked Misty Das, Planner, to begin the discussion of the CDBG subrecipient
Monitoring Plan Ms Das explained that the new monitoring plan entailed fofir 'different
procedures The first was a monthly status report from each public service sub-recipient, that
detailed program expenditures, number of participants and accomplishments for that inonth Ms
Das stated that all subreciplents had submitted their status reports for Jan, uary 20,00
The second monitoring procedure would be a semi-annual site visit from staff Ms Das said ~hat
the first of the semi-annual staff site visits was scheduled for June, 2000 At that time, staff
would compile a formal report for the Plan Commission,'detaihng findings from the visit as well
as a form summarizing the subrecipients monthly status reports from the previous six months
The third monitoring visit was a site visit from the Plan Commission CDBG sub-committee,
made up of Tome Astendes, Carol Tortorello, Bill Reddy and Gary Grouwmkel Ms Das asked
that, after each site visit, 'sub-committeee member~ report the visit to staff in order to keep a log
of the visits Tome Astendes verified she would monitor Camp Fire, Club RecPlex and Boy
Scouts and Carol Tortorello verified she would monitor Clayground and the Mentor. Program Ed
Janus asked to be relieved of monitoring Access to Care and Bill Reddy volunteered to take his
place , Gary Grouwtnkel volunteered to monitor Resources for~Commumty'LIvln~ and the
Resource Center for the Elderly
Ms Das explained to Plan Commission members that the fourth monitoring procedure was a
questionnaire for the rempients of pubhc servme funding This questlonnarre would be completed
anonymously during staff's site visit Bill Reddy and Carol Tortorello asked that all appheations
and monthly status reports from each public service program also be sent to the appropriate
CDBG sub-committee member
COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS'
Michael Blue explained that HUD has just recently visited the Village for a m6nitonng visit due
to the fact that the Village had not been monitored by'HUD in ten years The monitoring visit
was successful and HUD representatives reported no negative findings, o, 91y suggestions about
record keeping and file management Mr Blue stated that HUD representatives had inquired
about attending a Plan Commission meeting in order to give CDBG allocation suggestions
Chairman Zadel stated that Plan Commission would be interested in inviting HUD representatives
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of March I, 2000 Meeting Page 5
to a future Plan Commission meeting and the matter would need to be d~scussed at a future
meeting
Mr Blue also distributed information and reg~stration materials for Plan Commiss~on training
being conducted by the local professional planners association
Ed Janus moved to adjourn the meeting and Bill Reddy seconded the motion The motion carried
6-0 and the meeting was ad. loumed at 9 57 p m
Deputy D~rector of Commumty Development
Ju~th M ~'n~/ol~:, klCP, Planner
M~sty ISa~, Planfiel~
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO MICHAEL E JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~ ~
' FROM WILLIAM J COONEY, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVLEOP
DATE MARCH 16, 2000
SUBJECT FY 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT RESOLUTIONS
HUD has notified the Village that we have been granted $356,000 for our FY 2000 Community Development
Block Grant Although the Village was allocated more funding than we had expected, (we had budgeted for
$307,700),th~syear'sgmnt~s$6,0001essthanlastyear'sgrantof$362,000 As has been our practtee ~n the past,
the funds allocated above our budgeted amount will be used for the Single Family Rehabilitation Program
In September 1999, Village Board approved CDBG funding allocations for FY 2000 Programs and services
provided by CDBG subrec~p~ents have been underway since January The attached contracts reflect the
subreclplent allocations that were recommended by the Plan Commission and approved by the Village Board
Please forward th~s memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at the
March 22, 2000 meeting Staff will be present at thts meeting to further discuss this matter
I concur
D~rector of Commumty Development
H \GEN~PLNG~CDBG~2000 Apphcat~on~PC Mernos~tlke$3 memo.doc
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY LIVING
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community Development
Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, it has been detenmned by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
that the Resources for Community L~wng shall provide a program that mcludes "Commumty L~vmg," and
"Shared Housing for Special Populattons" for the residents of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect tn the
corporate boundartes of the Village of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Resources for Community Living and approved heretn,
comphes wtth the reqmrements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to
benefiting low and moderate ~ncome persons
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to attest hts
stgnature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant ~mplementat~on, which Agreement
ts between the Vdlage of Mount Prospect and the Resource Center for Commumty Livtng, a copy of
which Agreement ts attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"
SECTION TWO That thts Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after tts passage and
approval m the manner prowded by the law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ~ 2000
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
ATTEST
Velma W Lowe
Village Clerk
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into ttus day of .2000, by and between the
Village of Mount Prospect° a body pubhc of the State of Ilhno~s (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and the Kesourees for Community Living (hereinafter referred to as the "AGENCY"),
a Not-for-Profit Community-based organization
SECTION I
Statement of Purpose
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U S Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services v~th the AGENCY for operation of a program
to faeihtate services and housing for low- and moderate- income developmentally and/or physically
d~sabled residents of the Village of Mount Prospect
SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services with the AGENCY up to a maximum of
$1,000.00 and the AGENCY agrees to abide by the provisions and regulations of the 1974 Housing
and Community Development Act, as amended under which said contract is made, and to use sand
contract funds for the purposes set forth in Sectton I hereof and as conditioned by the provis~ons of
Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified in Section I shall be hmited to the
maximum amount specified m Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the AGENCY, and only
to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes
SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
-1-
A Indemmficatlon The AGENCY agrees to ~ndemmfy and save and hold harmless the
VILLAGE and each and everyone of It's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, ~nsurers
and successors from any and all claims, demands, causes of actions, expenses ~njunes, losses or
damages of whatever k~nd, character of descnptmn the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
cause, matter, act, or om~sslon arising out of the fadure of the AGENCY, or those acting under ~t,
to conform to the statues, ordinances or other regtdat~ons or requirements of any governmental
authority, ~n connection w~th the AGENCY's performance under this Agreement The AGENCY
agrees to defend against any clmms brought or hcttons filed against the VILLAGE with respect to
the subject of the ~ndemnity contmned here~n, whether such clmms or actions are rightfully or
wrongfully brought or filed In case of such a clmm brought or such an action filed, the AGENCY
agrees that the VILLAGE may employ attorneys of it's own select~on to appear and defend the claim
or action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to reasonable approval by the VILLAGE, at the
expense of the AGENCY. The AGENCY, at ~ts' option, shall have the sole authority for the
dlrect~on of the defense
B Non-discrimination The AGENCY, performing under th~s Agreement, shall not
discriminate against any worker, employee, or apphcant or any member of the pubhc, because of
race, creed, color, sex, age, or national ongm Such affirmative action shall include, but not be
hm~ted to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, termination, compensation,
selectton for training including apprent~cesbap The AGENCY agrees to post ~n conspmuous places
available to employees and apphcants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this
non-d~scrim~natory clause Thxs pohcy of non-dlscrimmatmn and affirmative action shall be
apphcable with regard to both AGENCY's internal personnel practices and ~t's actions in the
performance of thts Agreement The AGENCY hereby eertffies that I-9 forms are current and
employment verification has been completed regarding all employees The AGENCY agrees and
authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct compliance rewews or any other procedures to assure
compliance vath these prowsmns, subject to apphcable laws and regulatmns concerning privacy w~th
reasonable notice to the AGENCY
C Examination of Records The AGENCY will, at all t~mes, give HUD, the Comptroller
General of the Umted States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized representative, access to,
and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract, in
accordance with state and federal law Saxd records shall include verification of household income
and information on race or national origin. Ehg~ble households for tl~s program must have ~ncomes
below those noted in Extub~t C The AGENCY may establish income criteria below that noted ~n
Exhibit C
D Filing of Records The AGENCY shall file w~th the VILLAGE such dupheates of
records covenng such acttwtles to be performed in whole or m part, as specified in Exhibit "A"
E Availablht3' of Law, Regulations and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the AGENCY, prowde ~t vnth cop~es of all laws, regulatmus and orders, ~ncludmg those c~ted m tins
contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant funded programs, or which mxght
otherwise affect the performance of this Agreement. This agreement includes program income
reqmrements set forth in section 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not applicable to the AGENCY and
uniform administrative requirements described in section 24 CFR 570 502
SECTION IV
Compliance with Laws
The AGENCY, shall at all times, obJerve and comply wtth all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government which may m any manner affect the
performance of this Agreement, and the AGENCY shall be required to perform all acts under this
agreement in the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, is or
would be required to perform such acts Suspension or termination shall occur if the AGENCY
materially fails to comply with any term of the award in accordance with 24 CFR 85.44
SECTION V
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwith file all
necessary documents w~th HUD and shall comply w~th all applicable rules and regulations necessary
to facdltate acquisition of funds approved for this program by HUD The AGENCY shall not file
any lawsuit against the VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees as a result of this contract,
except that tlus Section shall not act as a bar to any lawsuits arising from the negligent acts of the
VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billino and Renorting Arrangements
Pursuant to ttus Agreement, the VILLAGE will disburse CDBG funds to the AGENCY on
the followng basis
1. The VILLAGE shall allocate the $1,000 00 contract amount for the services
stapulated in this Agreement. The AGENCY shall submit one invoice every three
months for work performed dunng the three (3) month invoice period Each invoice
wtll be for one-qumer (¼) of the contract amount
In addition to each invoice, the AGENCY shall submit to the VILLAGE a Monthly
Status Report covenng the activities of each month The report shall include
reformation on
a Each Mount Prospect chent who was in Agency supported housing dunng the
month showing the client's AGENCY number, client's address, and types of
services rendered The report may also include the munber of Mount
Prospect applications received and the number of Mount Prospect applicants
approved for the program The AGENCY may also report on the number of
presentations and other marketing efforts conducted over the month
2 A final report shall accompan~ the AGENCY's final billing This report will
lughhght the accomplishments of the program over the past year, summarize for the
period, from January l, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the number of Mount Prospect
residents served by t3~pe of assistance, and include the completion of Extublt B herein
attached This report shall also include the normal last quarterly report noted above
in Item A The final report is due no later than January 10, 2001
SECTION VII
Length of Contract
Tlus Agreement shall be valid from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice All costs associated with
completed tasks stroll be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation of all
documentation required under Section VI.
SECTION VIII
Assignments
The AGENCY shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the AGENCY shall
not transfer or assign any funds or claims due or to become due hereunder without the prior written
approval of the Village Manager Any transfer or assignment of funds pursuant to this agreement,
either in whole or in part, or any interest therein shall be due to the AGENCY shall be deemed of
no force or effect and shall not be binding upon the VILLAGE
SECTION IX
Notices and Communications
Notices and communications under tlus Agreement shall be sent registered or certified mall
postage prepared, to the respective pames as follows.
to the VILLAGE
Mr. Wflham J. Cooney, Jr.
Dtrector of Commumty Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Ilhnois 60056
to the AGENCY
Ms Valerie Thompson
Executave Dxrector
Resources for Commumty Llwng
800 West Central Road, State 103N
Mount Prospect, Ilhnms 60056
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST. BY.
President of the Village Board
RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY
Village Clerk LIVING AGENCY
ATTEST
BY
Executive D~rector
Notary Pubhc
RESOURCES/:OR
COMMUNITY LIVING
To offer adults with developmental and/or physical disabrlitles
opporfunilres to achrsve greater self-esteem, d~gn~ty and partlcipafion
in all aspects of community I~fe through affordable housing opbons,
individualized skill instruction and necessary suppor~ services.
In keeping w~th the above Miss;on Statement, Resources for Commun,ty Living (RCL) offers
magyar;va ser~ces designed to increase the Independence as well as the quality of life of persons
with developmental d~sabllltles (usually mental retardation) These services may include'
Affordable housing - Using both the shat'ed housing approach and independent apartments,
helps people with mental retardation to locate and lease homes and apartments vethln the
community Because these housing arrangements are Ilar owned by RCL (each participant signs
his/her own lease}, participants have greater control over their gym I~ves Housing an'angements
through RCL are not group-oriented, therefore the sbgma wh;ch ~s often associated wffh grOup
homes and ether congregate [wang arrangements is non-existent In fact, the mdlwduat's new
neighbors may not even know that the RCL participant has a d~sab;llty
Indlv.duallzed support services - Trained staff members provide individualized skill instru~on
and support services which are designed to increase independence, allowing parbc~pants to
remain in their communities These support servtces may include money management, us;ag
pubhc transportabon, cooking, nut.on, safety, case management and other necessary sktlls
RCL also prowdes assistance in linking parbc,pants with other commumty members, resources
and actrvrtles to help them to become active ertd contnbut~ng members of their communlbes
Social Group - Loneliness and tsolabon remain a significant problem for people w~th mental
retardahon, despite their physical presence in the community Because of this, RCL also
coordinates a monthly social group which prowdes an opportun~ for RCL participants to meet
others and make new friends These groups also provide an opportumty for staff members to
observe the Individual's social Interacbon spells, so that skill traimng (e g how to introduce self,
trust, asse~veness, relationships, etc) In apprOpnate areas may be addressed on an ind~wdual
bas~$ In add~tlon, several braes each year speakers are asked to present information during
social groups on venous subjects including safety, recreation and other important issues
Rent Subsidy - Finally, because many parsc;pan[t~ lack sbff;.c,ent resources to provide for
themselves, RCL offers a rent subsidy These rent subsidies are limited to $150 per month based
on the ~ndl~dual's Income and are derived enbrely from donatmns Because of this, rent subsidies
are not always available and cannot be relied on as a source of support, hnkage W~ long-term
sources of financial support. Including Section 8 Rental Assistance, provides a more stable and
rel,able future for the mdrv~dual
Currently, RCL serves 20 ~nd~wduals m 16 housing arran;emerita Them are currently 11 people
on RCL's waiting last In FY99, staff members prowded more than 3,000 hours of dtrect support
and skill instruction services for RCL parbc;pants
Please feel free to c;oetact Malone Thompson at (847) 632-1,554 or at I=:~m~d ad, dro~a
RESCOLIV@AOL COM, ~f you k.,,.,. ,.,~ ~,~., r~ .n ~
...... '~ .~ue.~., s _gard g Re. ot~rce~ for Commurllty Living
800 West ContrOl Road Su~t~ 105N · Mt ProspeCt it 6005~
(847~ 63~-155~ Voice · [84~) 632-0554 TDD · (847) 632-1570 FOx
~3-1G-e~ ll.'lG RECEIVED FROM ?~a e~2 leto F'.e2
EXHIBIT C
FY 2000 HUD LOW-INCOME LIMITS
Persons in Household Income Limits
I .............................................. $35,150
2 ~ $40,150
3 $45,200"
4 .............................................. $50,200
5 .............................................. $54,200
6 .............................................. $58,250
7 .............................................. $62,250
8 ......... ' ..................................... ~$66,250
Name of Program
Participant's Name
(Please Print)
To participate in certain federally funded programs, participants must meet certain income qualifications
I certify that my family/residence meets the income criteria listed below
Signature of Head of Household
No. ofPeopleinHousehold Maximum Household Income
1 $35,150
2 40,150
3 45,200
4 50,200
5 54,200
6 58,250
62,250
8 66,250
Smgle-Female
Head of Household Yes No
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
- 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone (847) 818-5328
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT FOR VILLAGE CDBG FUNDS
FISCAL YEAR JANUARY 1, 2000 TO DECEMBER 31, 2000
Applicant Phone
Address
Contact Person
Title
Agency F~scal Year
PROGRAM CLIENT STATISTICS
1 Total number of chents served th~s month
Mount Prospect portmn only
2 Total number of un,ts of service prowded dunng this month
Mount Prospect portion only
3 Define your"unlt of service"
4 Describe all chent fees for th~s month
5 Total amount actually received for th~s month from Village
6 Total amount actually used for this month
7 Describe any accomplishments achieved by clientele or program
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND HOPE NOW INC
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect Is a reclp~ant of funds under the Commumty Development
Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, it has been determmed by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
that Hope Now Inc shall develop a Homeless Day Center prowdmg assistance to homeless residents of
the Village of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the project proposed by Hope Now Inc and approved herein, compiles with the
reqmrements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to benefitmg low and
moderate ~ncome persons
NOW, THI~.REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor is hereby author,zed to s~gn and the Clerk d~rected to attest his
s~gantur¢ on an agreement for Commumty Development Block Grant implementation, which Agreement
is between the Village of Mount Prospect and Hope Now Inc, a copy of which Agreement ,s attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO That this Resolution shah be ~n full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval m the manner provided by the law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT.
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
A'I-IEST.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
AGREEMENT
Th~s Agreement ~s entered into flus day of 2000, by and between the
V~llage of Mount Prospect, a body pubhe of the State of Ilhno~s (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and HOPE NOW, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "CORPORATION") a not-for-
profit Corporation
SECTION I
Statement of Purpose
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U S Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services with the CORPORATION for development
of a day center to assist near homeless and homeless low- and moderate-income residents of the
Vdlage of Mount Prospect as outhne ~n the Scope of Services attached herewith as Exhibit "A"
SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services w~th the CORPORATION up to a
maximum of $35,000 00 for the development ora Day Center located m Palatine, IL, specifically
$35,000 for acquisition and rehab~htat~on of the property for a Homeless Day Center The
CORPORATION agrees to abide by the prowsions and regulations of the 1974 Housing and
Commumty Development Act, as amended under whteh said contract is made, and to use sa~d
contract funds for the purposes set forth in Section I hereof and as conditioned by the prows~ons of
SecUon III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obl~gat~on as identified in Section I shall be hmited to the
maramum amount specified m Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the CORPORATION,
and only to the extent such amount ~s received from HUD for such purposes
SECTION III.
Conditions of Contract
A Indenudficat~on The CORPORATION agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless
the VILLAGE and each and everyone of ~t's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, ~nsurcrs
and successors from any and all claims, demands, causes of actions, expenses injuries, losses or
damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the failure of the CORPORATION, or those acting
under it, to conform to the statues, ordinances or other regulations or requirements of any
governmental authonty, ~n connection ~w~th the CORPORATION's performance under flus
Agreement The CORPORATION agrees to defend agmnst any clmms brought or actmns filed
against the VILLAGE vath respect to the subject of the mdemmty contained herein, whether such
clmms or actions are rightfully or wrongfully brought or filed In case of such a clmm brought or
such an action filed, the VILLAGE agrees that the CORPORATION may employ attorneys of frs
own selection to appear and defend the claim or action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to
reasonable approval by the VILLAGE, at the expense of the CORPORATION The
CORPORATION, at its optmn, shall have the sole authority for the chrectlon of the defense
B Non-d~serlmmat~on The CORPORATION, perfonmng under this Agreement, shall not
d~scnmmate against any worker, employee, or apphcant or any member of the public, because of
race, creed, color, sex, age, or national ongln Such affirmative action shall include, but not be
hmlted to the following employment, upgrading, demotmn or transfer, termination, compensation,
selectmn for training ~nclud~ng apprenticeship The CORPORATION agrees to post ~n conspicuous
places avmlable to employees and applicants for employment, notmes setting forth the prows~ons
of this non-discriminatory clause This pohcy of non-d~scrunmatmn and affirmative actmn shall be
apphcable w~th regard to both CORPORATION's internal personnel pmctmes and it's actmns in the
performance of this Agreement The CORPORATION hereby certifies that I-9 forms are current
and employment venficatmn has been completed regarding all employees The CORPORATION
agrees and authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct comphance rewews or any other
procedures to assure comphance vath these prows~ons, subject to apphcable laws and regulations
concerning privacy w~th reasonable not,ce to the CORPORATION
C. Examination of Records The CORPORATION will, at all t~mes, give HUD, the
Comptroller General of the Umted States, and the VILLAGE, through any authonzed representative,
access to, and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract,
in accordance vath state and federal law Stud records shall ~nclude venficat~on of household income
and information on race or national ong~n Eligible households for this program must have mcomes
below those noted in Exhibit C
D Fthng of Records The CORPORATION shall file vath the VILLAGE such duplicates
of records covering such acttwt~es to be performed in whole or m part, as specified in Exlubit "A".
E. Availabihty of Law, Regulations and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the CORPORATION, provide it with copies of ail laws, regulations and orders, inchidmg those c~ted
m this contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant funded programs, or which m~ght
otherwise affect the performance of flus Agreement This agreement includes program ~ncome
reqmrements set forth m section 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not apphcable to the CORPORATION
and uniform admunstratlve reqmrements described ~n section 24 CFR 570 502
-2-
SECTION IV
Compliance with Laws
The CORPORATION, shall obtain btuldmg permits from the Village of Mount Prospect if
necessary and shall at all tm~es observe and comply with all laws, urdmances or regulations of the
Federal, State, County and local government which may in any manner affect the performance of
this Agreement, and the CORPORATION shall be required to perform all acts under this agreement
in the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, is or would be
reqmred to perform such acts Suspensxon or termination shall occur if the CORPORATION
materially fa~ls to comply with any term of the award in accordance with 24 CFR 85 44
SECTION V
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwith file~all
necessary documents vnth HUD and shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations necessary
to facilitate acquisition of funds approved for flus program by HUD. The CORPORATION shall
not file any lawsmt against the VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees as a result of this
contract, except that flus Section shall not act as a bar to any lawsuxts arising from the neghgent acts
of the VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billing and Reporting Arrangements
Pursuant to this Agreement, the VILLAGE w~ll disburse CDBG funds to the
CORPORATION on the following basis:
1 The VILLAGE shall allocate the $35,000 00 contract amount for the services
stxpulated m flus Agreement. The CORPORATION shall subrmt invoices for work
completed, respected and approved by Village Inspectors
2. A final report shall accompany the CORPORATION's final billing and report no later
than January I0, 2001 Tins report will summarize the benefits of the project,
-3-
financial summary of the project from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000
SECTION VII
Length of Contract
Tins Agreement shall be valid from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by either party upon tlurty-(30) days written notme All costs associated wth
completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation of all
documentation reqmred under Section VI. ~
SECTION VIII
Assignments
The CORPORATION shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the
CORPORATION shall not transfer or assign any funds or claims due or to become due hereunder
without the prior written approval of the Village Manager Any transfer or assignment of funds
pursuant to t!us agreement, either in whole or in part, or any interest therein shall be due to the
CORPORATION shall be deemed of no force or effect and shall not be binding upon the VILLAGE
SECTION IX
Notices and Communications
Notices and commumcatlons under this Agreement shall be sent registered or certified mml postage
prepared, to the respective parties as follows'
to the VILLAGE
Mr William J Cooney, Jr
Director of Commumty Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Ilhno~s 60056
to the CORPORATION
Ms Beth Nabors
Director
HOPE NOW Ine
31 E Golf Terrace
Arlington Heights, IL 60005
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST. BY:
President of the V~llage Board
Vdlage Clerk
ATTEST. HOPE NOW Inc
BY.
D~rector
Notary Public
tf ~
EXHIBIT A
CURRENT SERVICE I)ESCRIPTION:
The Hope Center provides the following case management and supportive services
· Food Vouchers
· Transportation Vouchers
· A Food Pantry
· Financial Assistance for Housing . ~
· Financial Assistance for Medmal
· Employment Readiness Services
· Employment Referral Serrates
· Mental Health Counseling
· Advocacy
· Assistance in obtmmng legal identification documents (birth
certificates, state ID, Drivers License, etc )
· A Clottung Closet
· Referral to a network of pro bono professionals including legal,
medical and dental
· Entitlement Services
· Unhmtted phone usage for the purpose of locating employment,
housing or to set up medical, legal, dental, etc appmnhnents
· A Mailing Address
· An Anonymous Telephone Voice Mall System
· A General Message Servace System
HOPE NOW, Inc is a not-for-profit agency that was formed m 1992 HOPE NOW Is an
acronym that stands for. __Homeless-_QOpportumtles for Persons encompassing the
Northwest Its mission is to assist the homeless and those at risk ofbecormng homeless
to receive needed services in a compassionate and suppomve manner The homeless
elements of the communities served compnse our expected chents Amajor premise is
that HOPE NOW, Inc will not duplicate services provided by existing agenc~as, but wdl
focus on unmet needs
The Hope Center provides daytime services for the homeless or near homeless
population All of our clients are at or below poverty level and are people who were
born, raised and educated in our northwest suburbs Our service area includes all of
northwest suburban Cook County Tins fragile segment of the poptflation served by
- HOPE NOW, Inc are those mdiwduals with multiple needs and are many times
ineligible for sermces prowded by other soc~at service agencies located m the northwest
suburbs The Hope Center has an active caseload of 469 Some of those clients
EXHIBIT A
Page 2
(398 chents or 85% of the caseload) are homeless and need intensive intervention to
bnng them to a level of self-sufficiency The remainder ofthe cases (71 chents or 15%
of the caseload) are at risk of becoming homeless and need preventive services
The Hope Center provides case management and suppomve services including food
vouchers, transportation vouchers, a food pantry, financial assistance for housing,
financial assistance for medical needs, employment readiness services, and employment
referral services In addition, the Hope Center prowdes mental health counseling,
advocacy, assistance in obtaining legal identification documents (birth certificates, state
ID, Drivers License, etc ), and a clothing closet The Hope center also offers referrals to
a network ofpro bono professionals including legal, medical and dental, entitlement
servlces, unhmited phone usage for the purpose &locating employment, housing or to
set up medmal, legal, or dental appolntments, a mailing address, and an anonymous
telephone voice mall system .
HOPE NOW, Inc developed the Hope Center because the homeless population was
falling between the bureaucratic cracks There was much too much burden placed on the
falth communmes and ~n turn the homeless and near homeless men, women and cluldren
were not being served m the whohstic manner necessary to achieve a more self sufficient
population The chent base we serve include single men and women, famlhes, semor
citizens, veterans, vmt~ms &domestic violence, substance abusers, and the mentally ill
Approxamately sixty pement of our population Is mentally fll
The variance of mental illness we see can range from situational/mild depression, to
chronically mentally ill, and everything in between The majority of our mentally ill
clients can and would be functional members &our commumty if they were able to
receive the funding for their prescription medication and the case management needed to
momtor their consistency with taking that medication Once we can assist the chent in
obtmning the needed medication, through monitonng the client's progress and through
coordination with the mental health professionals, the HOPE Center is able to move the
chent toward self-sufficiency
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL, INC
FOR THE ACCESS TO CARE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect Is a rec~pient of funds under the Community Development
Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, ~t has been detenmned by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
that the Suburban Primary Health Care Council, Inc shall prowde a program to facilitate access to
primary health care m the corporate hm~ts of the Village of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Suburban Primary Health Care Council, Inc and approved
hereto, complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development w~th
respect to beneHtmg low and moderate mco~me persons
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COLrNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor ~s hereby anthonzed to sign and the Clerk directed to attest h~s
s~gnature on an agreement for Commumty Development Block Grant ~mplementation, which Agreement
~s between the Village of Mount Prospect and Suburban Primary Health Care Council, Inc, a copy of
which Agreement ~s attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO That th~s Resolution shall be m full force and effect from and after ~ts passage and
approval ~n the manner prowded by lhe law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED th~s day of. March, 2000
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
ATTEST
Velma W Lowe
Village Clerk
AGREEMENT.
'Flus Agreement ~s entered into th~s day of 2000, by and between the
Village of Mount Prospect, a body pubhe of the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and the Suburban Primary Health Care Council, (hereinafter referred to as the
"COUNCIL"), a not-for-profit Corporation
SECTION I
Statement of Purpose
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U S Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services w~th the COUNCIL for operation of a
program to faclhtate access to primary health care for low-and moderate-income residents of the
V~llage of Mount Prospect as outhne m the Scope of Services attached herewith as Exhibit "A".
SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services wth the COUNCIL up to a maximum of
$8,500 00 and the COUNCIL agrees to abide by the prows~ons and regulations of the 1974 Housing
and Commumty Development Act, as amended under which sa~d contract ss made, and to use sa~d
contract funds for the purposes set forth m Section I hereof and as conditioned by the prows~ons of
Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified in Section I shall be hmited to the
maximum amount speclfiect in Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the COUNCIL, and only
to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such proposes
SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
A Indemmfieatlon The COUNCIL agrees to indemmfy and save and hold harmless the
VILLAGE and each and everyone of ~t's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, msurers
and successors from any and all claims, demands, causes of actions, expenses ~njuries, losses or
damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the failure of the COUNCIL, or those acting under it,
-1-
to conform to the statues, ordinances or other regulations or requirements of any governmental
authority, in coanection wth the COUNCIL's performance under this Agreement The COUNCIL
agrees to defend against any claims brought or actions filed against the VILLAGE w~th respect to
the sublect of the indemnity contained herein, whether such claims or actions are rightfully or
wrongfully brought or flied In case of such a claim brought or such an action filed, the VILLAGE
agrees that the COUNCIL may employ attorneys of frs own selection to appear and defend the
clmm or actaon on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to reasonable approval by the VILLAGE, at the
expense of the COUNCIL The COUNCIL, at frs option, shall have the sole authority for the
direction of the defense
B Non-discrimination The COUNCIL, performing under tins Agreement, shall not
discnnunate against any worker, employee, or applicant or any member of the public, because of
race, creed, color, sex, age, or nataonal origin Such affirmative actaon shall include, but not be
lnmted to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, termmataon, compensation,
selection for tralmng lncluchng apprentmeslup The COUNCIL agrees to post in conspicuous places
available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this
non-discriminatory clause Tlus policy of non-discrimination and affirmative action shall be
applicable v~th regard to both COUNCIL's internal personnel practices and it's actions in the
performance of flus Agreement The COUNCIL hereby certifies that I-9 forms are current and
employment verification has been completed regarding all employees The COUNCIL agrees and
authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct compliance reviews or any other procedures to assure
compliance wuth these pmwslons, subject to apphcable laws and regulations concetmng privacy w~th
reasonable notice to the COUNCIL
C Examination of Records The COUNCIL wtll, at all times, give HUD, the Comptroller
General of the United States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized representative, access to,
and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract, in
accordance with state and federal law. Said records shall include verification of household income
and mformatlon on race or national origin Eligible households for this program must have incomes
below those noted m Exinbit C. The COUNCIL may establish program income cntena below that
noted in Exinblt C
D Fthng of Records The COUNCIL shall file w~th the VILLAGE such duplicates of
records covenng such actlwties to be performed in whole or in part, as specified in Exhibit "A".
E Avatlabthty of Law, Regulatlons and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the COUNCIL, provide it wath copies of all laws, regulations and orders, including those cited m flus
contract, wluch regulate the operation of the Block Grant funded programs, or winch might
othervase affect the performance of this Agreement. This agreement includes program income
requirements set forth in section 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not applicable to the COUNCIL and
-2-
umform administrative requirements described ~n section 24 CFR 570 502.
SECTION IV
Compliance with Laws
The COUNCIL, shall at all hme~, observe and comply wath all laws, ordinances or
regtdat~ons of the Federal, State, County and local government wiuch may m any manner a_fleet the
performance of th~s Agreement, and the COUNCIL shall be reqmred to perform all acts under tlus
agreement in the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, ~s or
would be reqmred to perform such acts Suspensmn or termmatmn shall occur ff the COUNCIL
materially falls to comply wath any term of the award in accordance wath 24 CFR 85 44
SECTION V
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the exeeutmn of tins Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwith file all
necessary documents with HUD and shall comply w~th all apphcable roles and regulatmns necessary
to faeihtate acquisition of funds approved for this program by HUD The COUNCIL shall not file
any lawsuit agmnst the VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees as a result of this contract,
except that this Section shall not act as a bar to any lawsuits arising from the neghgent acts of the
VILLAGE or any of frs officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billing and Reporting Arrangements
Pursuant to tlus Agreemeni, the VILLAGE wall d~sburse CDBG funds to the COUNCIL on
the followang basis
1. The VILLAGE shall allocate the $8,500 00 contract amount for the services
stipulated in this Agreement The COUNCIL shall submit no more than one lnvome
per month for an amount equal to one-twelfth of the contract amount
-3-
Every month, the COUNCIL, shall subrmt to the VILLAGE a Monthly Performance
report Said report shall include avmlable information on
a Each Mount Prospect client served dunng the month, showung the client's
COUNCIL number, address, and type(s) ofservme rendered Servmes may
also include number of applications received and the number of applicants
approved for the program
2 A final report shall accompany the COUNCIL's final billing and regular monthly
report in January of 2001 This report will highlight the accomplishments of the
program over the past year, summarize for the fiscal year, from January 1, 2000 to
December 31, 2000, the number of Mount Prospect residents served by types of
assistance, and include the completion of Exlublt B herein attached The final report
is due no later that January 10, 2001.
SECTION VII
Length of Contract
This Agreement shall be valid from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by either party upon tlurty (30) days written notice All costs associated with
completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation of all
documentation required under Section VI
SECTION VIII
Assignments
The COUNCIL shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the COUNCIL shall
not transfer or assign any funds or claims due or to become due hereunder without the pnor written
approval of the Village Manager Any transfer or assignment of funds pursuant to thls agreement,
either in whole or in part, or any interest thereto shall be due to the COUNCIL shall be deemed of
no force or effect and shall not be binding upon the VILLAGE
-4-
SECTION IX
Notices and Communications
Notices and communications under ttus Agreement shall be sent registered or certified marl
postage prepared, to the respective part, es as £ollows
to the VILLAGE
Mr Wflham J Cooney, Jr
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Ilhno~s 60056
to the COUNCIL
Mrs Vmtona B~gelow
President
Suburban Primary Health Care Council
2235 Enterprise Drive, State 2504
Westchestcr, Ilhno~s 60154
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST BY:
President of the Vdlage Board
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Village Clerk COUNCIL
ATTEST
BY
Executive D~rector
Notary Pubhc
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Access to Care Program
In Illinois, 1.5 million persons are without public or private
health insurance coverage. In suburban Cook County more than
156,000 low-income individuals are uninsured and unable to afford
even basic health care services.
The Access to Care program provides access to primary care services
for low-income, uninsured residents of suburban Cook County.
Eligibility is limited to residents with a family income less than
twice the federal poverty level who are uninsured for primary
health care and ineligible for public programs such Medicaid and
Medicare.
The Council contracts with local providers throughout the area and
pays them a discounted rate to provide services to persons enrolled
in the Access to Care program. Services include office visits to
a primary care physician, routine laboratory and radiology tests
and prescription medication. Patients make a small co-payment
directly to the provider for each service.
In the northwest suburbs screening for eligibility and enrollment
occur at township offices, at the Villages of Mount Prospect,
Arlington Heights, Des Plaines, and Schau~hurg, at CEDA Northwest
and Meadows Community Services, and at the Cook County Department
of Public Health. Enrollment is generally for a one-year period
and there is no fee to enroll.
Preventive services which are already available in the community
at low cost are not duplicated by Access to Care. All clients
receive a booklet listing free or low-cost preventive services
available in the area. The Council has coordination agreements
with the organizations providing these services.
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE ELDERLY
FOR SENIOR SHARED HOUSING
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Commumty Development
Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, ,t has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
that the Resource Center for the Elderly shall prowde a program to match homeowners or apartment
dwellers w~th home seekers, providing affordable housing for the elderly, single parent, persons on fixed
incomes, displaced homemakers, and other low income persons needing affordable housing for residents
within the corporate boundaries of the Village of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Resource Center for the Elderly and approved herein, comphes
with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to benefiting
low and moderate income persons
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor is hereby authonzed to sign and Clerk d~rected to attest h~s s~gnature
on an agreement for Commumty Development Block Grant ~mplementation, which Agreement Is between
the V~llage of Mount Prospect and the Resource Center for the Elderly, a not-for-profit corporate, a copy
of which Agreement ~s attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exh~b,t "A"
SECTION TWO That th~s Resolution shall be m full force and effect from and after ~ts passage and
approval in the manner prowded by the law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000
Gerald L Farley, Mayor
ATt'EST
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into this day of 2000, by and between the
Village of Mount Prospect, a body public of the State of Ilhnols (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and the Resource Center for the Elderly, (l~eremafter referred to as the "AGENCY")
a not-for-profit Community-based organization , ~ ~
SECTION I
Statement of Purpose
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U.S. Depamnent of Houslng and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services w~th the AGENCY for operation of a program
to facilitate services to Iow- and nlodemte-mcome senior citizen residents of the Village of Mount
Prospect as outline in the Scope of Services attached herewith as Exhibit "A".
SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereb~ contract for services with the AGENCY up to a maximum of
$1,750 00 and the AGENCY agrees to abide by the provlsmns and regulations of the 1974 Housmg
and Commumty Development Act, as amended under which said contract is made, and to use said
contract funds for the purposes set forth m Section I hereof and as conditioned by the provis~ons of
Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified m Section I shall be limited to the
maximum amount specified in Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the AGENCY, and only
to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes
.SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
A Indemmfieat~on The AGENCY agrees to indemmfy and save and hold harmless the
~VILLAGE and each and everyone of it's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, insurers
and sueeassors from any and all claims, demands, causes of actions, expenses injuries, losses or
damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
-1-
cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the failure of the AGENCY, or those acting under xt,
to conforni to the statues, ordinances or other regulations or reqmrements of any governmental
authority, m connection ~with the AGENCY's performance under this Agreement The AGENCY
agrees to defend agmnst any clmms brought or actions filed agmnst the VILLAGE with respect to
the subject of the ~ndemmty contained here~n, whether such claims or actions are r~ghtfully or
wrongfully brought or filed In case of such a claim brought or such an action filed, the VILLAGE
agrees that the AGENCY may employ attorneys of it's own select~on to appear and defend the claim
or action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to reasonable approval by the VILLAGE, at the
expense oflhe AGENCY. The AGENCY, at ~ts option, shall have the sole authonty for the d~rectton
of the defense ~
B. Non-d~senmmat~on The AGENCY, performing under th~s Agreement, shall not
d~senfiunate against any worker, employee, or apphcant or any m,ember of the pubhe, because of
race, creed, color, sex, age, or national ongin Such affirmative action shall include, but not be
hrmted to the follow~ng employinent, upgradm~g, demotion or transfer, termination, compensation,
select,on for traimng ~nclud~ng apprenticeslup The AGENCY agrees to post m conspicuous places
available to employees and apphcatus for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this
non-d~serinnnatory clause Th~s pohcy of non-d~scnmmat~on and affirmative action shall be
appheable vath regard to both AGENCY's ~ntemal personnel practices and ~t's actions ~n the
performance of th~s Agreement The AGENCY hereby certifies that I-9 forms are current and
employment verification has been completed regarding all employees The AGENCY agrees and
hi~thorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct comphance rewews or any other procedures to assure
comphanee w~th these prowsions, subject to apphe~ abl6 law,s,a~d regulations con,cenun~ g privacy Oath
reasonable not~ee to the AGENCY
C Examination of Records The AGENCY will, at all t~mes, give HUD, the Comptroller
General of the Umted States, and the VILLAGE, through any authonzed representative, access to,
a~nd the right to examine all records, books, pipers or documents related*to the contract, ~n
accordance w~th state and federal l~w. Smd records shall include venfieat~on of household income
and mformat~on on race or nattunal o~gin Ehgible h~)useholds for tins program must have incomes
below those noted m Exlub~t C. The AGENCY may estabhsh program income cntena below that
noted m Exhibit C.
D Fthng of Records The AGENCY shall file wth the VILLAGE such duphcates of
records covenng such aet~wt~es to be performed in whole or m part, as specified in Exhibit "A"
E. Avmlabd~tJ' of Law, Regulat~uns and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the re,quest of
the AGENCY, provtde ~t wth copies of ail laws, regulalaons and orders, including those e~ted in this
'contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant funded programs, or wtueh might
otherwise affect the performance of th~s Agreement This agreement includes program ~neome
reqmrements set forth an sectaon 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not apphcable to the AGENCY and
umform admanistratave reqmrements described an section 24 CFR 570 502
SECTION IV
t
Compliance with Laws
The AGENCY, shall at all ames, observe and comply vath all laws, ordinances or
r~gulatlons of the Federal, State, County and local government wtuch may in any manner affect the
performance ofttus Agreement, and the AGENCY shall be reqmmd to perform all acts under ttus
agreement an the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, as or
would be reqmred to perform such acts Suspensaon or termination shall occur if the AGENCY
materially fails to comply with any term of the award an accordance wath 24 CFR 85 44
SECTION V ~
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthv~th file all
necessary documents vath HUD and shall comply vath all apphcable rules and regulations necessary
to facihtate acquisitaon of funds approved for this program by HUD. The AGENCY shall not file
any lawsuit against the VILLAGE or any of at's officers or employees as a result of this contract,
except that this Section shall not act as a bar to any lawsmts arasmg from the neghgent acts of the
VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billing and Reporting Arrangements
Pursuant to this Agreement, the VILLAGE will dasburse CDBG funds to the AGENCY on
the following basis'
1. The VILLAGE shall allocate the $1,750.00 contract amount for the serrates
stipulated in thas Agreement The AGENCY shall submit no more than one ~nvoice
every three (3) months for an amount equal to one-quarter of the contract amount
-3-
Every month the AGENCY shall submit to the VILLAGE a Monthly ~tat~s l~eport
covering the aetivit~es of the invoiced period Smd report shall mclude mformatlon
on
a Each Mount Prospect client whose home was used for shared housing dunng
the month showing the chent's AGENCY munber, client's address, and
startang date when shared housmg was provided, The report may also include
th~ number of Mount Prospect apphcations received and the number of
Moue. t Prospect applicants approved for the program
A final report shall accompany the AGENCY's final billing. Ttus repo~ mil
lughhght the accomphshments of the ~program over the past twelve months,
summanzed for the fiscal year, from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the
number of Mount Prospect Residents served by type for assistance, and include the
completion of Exhibit B here~n attached This report shall be due no later than
January 10, 2001
SECTION VII
L gth of Contract ~ '
~ ~ This Agreement shall be vahd from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by e~ther party upon thirty (30) days written notme All costs associated w~th
completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentatl6n of all
documentation requlrcd under Sectmn VI
SECTION VIII
Assignments
The AGENCY shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the AGENCY shall
not transfer or assign any funds or clamas due or to become due hereunder w~thout the prior written
~approval of the Village Manager. Any tr_ansfer or assignn~ent of funds pursuant to flus agreement,
either in whole or m part, or any interest therem shall be due to the AGENCY shall be deemed of
force or effect d shall not be b dmg upon the VILLAGE ' "
no an in
- SECTION IX ~
Notices and Communications
Notices and communicatmns under tins Agreement shall be sent registered or certified mad
postage prepared, to the respective pames as follows
to the VILLAGE
Mr William J Cooney, Jr
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
' 100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
to the AGENCY
Suzanne Skala ~
Executive D~rector ~: ~
Resource Center for the Elderly
1801 West Central Road
Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST. BY
President of the Village Board
RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE
Village Clerk ELDERLY AGENCY
ATTEST
BY.
Executive D~rector
Notary Public
the Resource Center for the Elderly
Exhibit A
THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE ELDERLY
SENIOR SHARED HOUSING PROGRAM
The Resource Center for the Eldedy's Senior Shared Houslng Program match ~es_
homeowners or apartment dwellers w~ homeseekers, provides affordable
housing for the elderly, single parents, persons on fixed incomes, displaced
I
homemakers, and other ow ,ncome persons needing affordab e housing
Benefits include a sharing of expenses, companionship, secunty and
independence
180I West Central Road
Arkngton He~tzts~ IL 60005
(0°47) $77-7070 FAX (847') $77-7073
......... EXHIBIT C
....... ~ ~ ,FY 2000 }IUD LOW-INCOME LIMITS
Persons in I-Iousehold ~
. Ineome L~m~ts
3 ................... .~ .......................... $45,200
4 ' ' $50,200
5 ..... $54,200
7 ~ ~.$62,250
8 .............................................. 1566,250
Name of Program. ~
Participant's Name
(Please Print)
To participate in certain federally funded programs, participants must n~eet certain meo~ne qualifications
I ce~lf'y th~ my family/residence meets the income criteria listed below
Slgnatu~ of Head of Household
No. of People in Household Maximum Household Income
1 $35,150
2 40,150
3 45,200
4 50,200 ~*
5 54,200
6 58,250
7 62,250
8 66,250
Single-Female
Head of Household Yes No
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET -.~.
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone (847) 818-5328 -~ ~
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT FOR VILLAGE CDBG FUNDS
FISCAL YEAR JANUARY 1, 2000 TO DECEMBER 31, 2000
Applicant Phone
Address
Contact Person . .~
T~tle
Agency F~scal Year
PROGRAM CLIENT STATIsTIcs
I Total number of chents served this month
Mount Prospect porbon only
2 Total number of un,ts of service prowded during this month
Mount Prospect port,on only
3 Define your"umt of service"
4 Describe all client fees'for this n~onth
5 Total amount actually received for th~s month from Village
6 Total amount actually used for this month
7 Describe any accomplishments achieved by chentale or program
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE CAMP FIRE BOYS AND GIRLS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO COUNCIL
FOR THE NEW HORIZONS PROGRAM AND CAMP KOOL SUMMER PROGRAM
~tHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect IS a recipient of funds under the Commumty Development
Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
that the Camp F~re Boys and GIrls Metropolitan Chicago Council shall provide a New Horizons Program
originating in south Mount Prospect, and a Camp Kool Summer Program originating m the Boxwood
area, all wlthm the corporate bonndarles of the Village of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Camp Fire Boys and Girls Metropolitan Chicago Council and
approved herein, eomphes with the requirements of the Department of Houslng and Urban Development
w,th respect to benefiting low and moderate income persons
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor is hereby authorized to s~gn and the Clerk d~reeted to attest h,s
s,gnature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant lmplementat, on, wh,ch Agreement
is between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Camp Fnte Boys and G~rls Metropolitan Chicago
Council, a not-for-profit corporate, a copy of which Agreement Is attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exh,blt "A".
SECTION TWO That th~s Resolutlun shall be m full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval ,n the manner prov,ded by the law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT.
PASSED and APPROVED thls day of ,2000
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
ATTEST.
Velma W Lowe
Village Clerk
AGREEMENT
Tbas Agreement ~s entered into tins" day of 2000, by and between the
Village of Mount Prospect, a body public of the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and Camp Fire Boys and G~rls Metropolitan Chicago Council, a not-for-profit
corporation of the State of Illlnms (hereinafter referred to as the "COUNCIL")
SECTION I
Statement'of Purpose
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hGreinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services with the COUNCIL for operation of a New
Horizons Program and a Camp Kool Program as outlined in the Scope of Services attached helewath
as Exhibit "A".
.SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for serrates w~th the COUNCIL up to a maximum of
$4,000 00 for the New Horizons Program and a maximum of $12,500 for the Camp Kool Program
and the COUNCIL agrees to abide by the provisions and ?egulations of the 1974 Housing and
Commumty Development Act, as amended under which said contract is made, and to use said
contract funds for the purposes set forth in Section I hereof and as conditioned by the provisions of
Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified in Section I shall be limited to the
maximum amount specified m Section II, to the actual amount mvoieed by the COUNCIL, and only
to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes
SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
A Indemmfication The COUNCIL agrees to mdemmfy and save and hold harmless the
VILLAGE and each and everyone of it's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, insurers
and successors from any and all claims, demands, causes of actions, expenses injuries, losses or
damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
cause, matter, act, or omission arismg out of the failure of the COUNCIL, or those acting under it,
to conform to the statues,' ordinances or other regulations or requirements of any governmental
-1-
authority, ~n connecaon w~th the COUNCIL's performance under this Agreement The COUNCIL
agrees to defend agmnst any claims brought or a~tlons filed agmnst the VILLAGE v~th respect to
th~ ~subject of the indemnity contained here~n, whether such clmms or actions are rightfully or
wrongfully brought or filed. In case of such a claim brought or such an action filed, the COUNCIL
agrees that the VILLAGE may employ attorneys of frs own selectmn to appear and defend the clann
or action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to reasonable approval by the VILLAGE, at the
expense of the COUNCIL The COUNCIL, at it's option, shall have the sole authority for the
d~rection of the defense
B. Non-d~sefimmat~on The C~UN,CIL, pe.rfornung under this Agreement, shall not
~hsenmmate against any worker, employee, or apphear~) or any member of the public, beeanse of
~'race, creed, color, sex, age, oi' national origin Such affirmative action shall ~nclude, but not be
,ltrnited to the following, employment, upgrading, demotton or transfer, termination, compensation,
selection for trmnmg including apprentmeship The COUNCIL agrees to post in conspicuous places
available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provismns of tlus
non-discnm~natory clause Tins pohcy of non-d~scnm~natlon and affirmative action shall be
apphcable v~th regard to both COUNCIL's ~ntemal personnel practices and ~t's actions in the
performance oftlus Agreement The COUNCIL agrees and authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to
conduct comphance rewews or any other procedures to assure comphance with these provisions
C. Examination of Records The Ci)UNCIL vail, at all t~mes, g~ve HUD, the Comptroller
General of the United States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized representative, access to,
and the ngh~ to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract, m
accordance w~th state and federal law
D Fthng of Records The COUNCIL shall file vath the VILLAGE such duphcates of
records covenng ?uch ac,tl¥1tles t? be performed m whole or In part, as specified in Exhth~t "A".
E~ Availability of Law, Regulations and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the COUNCIL, pmwde it w~th copies of all laws, regulatmus and orders, including those c~ted in tins
contract, which regulate the operataon of the Block Grant funded programs, or which might
otherwise affect the performance of this'Agreement Tins agreement includes program ~ncome
requirements set forth in section 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not applicable to the COUNCIL and
uniform adnumstratlve requirements described in section 24 CFR 570 502
~ SECTION IV ~ ~ ·
, Compliance with Laws ~ ,~,.. ~,
' ' The COUNCIL, shall at all times, observe ~nd c~omply vath all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government wtuch may m any manner affect the
-2'
performance of th~s Agreement, and the COUNCIL shall be reqmred to perform all acts under flus
agreement ~n the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, is or
would be reqmred to perform such acts Suspension or termmataon shall occur ff the COUNCIL
materially fmls to comply w~th any term of the award ~n accordance w~th 24 CFR 85 44
SECTION V
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the execution of tins Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthvath file all
necessary documents wth HUD and shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations necessary
to facilitate acquis~tmn of funds approved for this program by HUD. The COUNCIL shall not file
any lawsuit against the VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees as a result of this contract,
except that th~s Sectmn shall not act as a bar to any lawsuits arising from the neghgent acts of the
VILLAGE or any of ~fs officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billing and Reporting Arrangements
Pursuant to tins Agreement, the VILLAGE will d~sburse CDBG funds to the COUNCIL on
the follovang bas~s
1 The VILLAGE shall allocate the $16,500 00 contract amount for the services
stipulated in tins Agreement The COUNCIL shall subunt invoices to the VILLAGE
and a performance repqrt every month Th~s report shall include
a Monthly Status Report
b Attendance s~gn-m sheets from each meeting
c Number of trips taken and number of ctuldren on each for the repomng
penod
Each report vnll be due at the end of the month The COUNCIL shall invoice the VILLAGE bi-
monthly for a total of slx invoices for the New Honzons Program The COUNCIL shall invoice the
VILLAGE a total of five t~mes for the Camp Kool Program beginning m March, 2000 and endmg
in August, 2000
2 A final report shall accompany the COMPANY's final bflhng This report will
htghhght the accomphshments of the program over the past twelve months,
summarized for the fiscal year, from January l, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the
number of Mount Prospect Residents served, and ~nelude the completion of Exinb~t
-3-
" "B" here~n attached This report shall be due no later than January 10, 2001.
a Total salaries, ~ ' '
b Cost of transportation,
c Cost of office supphes, program supplies, food and drinks, registration,
insurance, admission fees, custodial fees and memberships,
d Miscellaneous Identify each
3 The COUNCIL shall als~o have cbmpleted by the parents or guardians of each child
an Application Form, using Exlublt C ~ Tlus form may be part of the cluld's
apphcat~on for participating in the program Said application shall indicate to the
satisfaction ~>f the Village, each participating cbald's household annual income as
being below or above current HUD Section 8 Limits Failure to subnut a completed
application to the Village for each participating cluld's household will violate the
terms of this Agreement and cancel any pending and future payments due the
COUNCIL from the VILLAGE
All exhlhtS, reports and invoices must be completed and sent to the Village of Mount Prospect no
later than January 10, 2001
I I , ~SECTION VII
Length of Contract
This Agreement ~shall be vahd fro~ Januar~ 1, ~2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice All costs associated with
completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation of all
documentation required und~er Section VI
~ ~ SECTION VIII~
Assignments ~
' The COUNCIL shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the COUNCIL shall
not transfer or assign any funds or clanns due or to beconid due hereunder without the prior written
approval of the Village Manager Any transfer or assignment of funds pursuant to this agreement,
either in whole or m part, or any interest therein shall be due to the ~COUNCIL shall be deemed of
no force or effect and shall not be binding upon the VILLAGE
SECTION IX
~ Notice's and communications
Notices and commumcatlons under this Agreement shall be sent registered or certified mall
postage prepared, to the respective parties as follows
to the VILLAGE "~
Mr. William J. Cooney, Jr.
D~rector of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
to the COUNCIL
Ms Jean D. Lachowlcz
Executive Director ' -
Camp F~re Boys and Girls Metropolitan Chicago Council
203 North Wabash Avenue, Suite .1518
Chicago, Illinois 60601
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST. BY:
~ ~ President of the Village Board
CAMPFIRE BOYS AND GIRLS
Vtllage Clerk METROPOLITAN CHICAGO COUNCIL,
An Illmois not-for-profit corporation
ATTEST:
BY.
Executive Director
Notary Public
-5-
i/ Camp Fire
~-----~ ,Boys and C~Is®
Metropolitan Chicago,Council
Misty Dss ' ,. ~' Ivlacoh 16, 2000
Village of Mt Prospect ~ , '. ,, EXH.IBIT ~, . ~., ~
100 S Emerson
Mt Prospect, Illmols 60056
Dear Misty,
Camp Ftr¢ Boy~ and Girls ~s exoted about tb~r new program "Camp Fire Camp Koor'.
This program is targeted for the youth m the Box-wood area of Mt. Prospect Youth from
the apa~h,,ent complex across from Euehd School will be our main draw This year, x~ith
Eucld School undergcnng some constmotlon, w~ will t~ ra~lng at the Prospi~
Chnman Chin, da wtuch is % b!~k fr_~. the_ ~ho~l
Camp Kool ~s open to all boy~ and gaffs, ages 5-t2 Our goal Is to ~'ach 120 yguth VAth a
five-week summer camp program The camp mill be offered 2 days a week frcnn 10 AI~
unttl 3 PM This year, thc camp focus will be on educalional and fun field trips If
addnlonal support comes in, we vail be able to extend to 3 day/week and offer our ~
enrichment programs at Prospeet Chfistlan Church Smo~ the obureh is sm~ll for our m
group, we will use thc thrd day by splitting the camp into two groups and have ~A the
group work at the church while the other ¼ is on a field trip Then, onc~ a week, we will
offer amp for the camp as a group
Through Camp Fke, youth learn leadership and decision-making sldlls, take pa~ in fun,
social, and r~n~afional a~tivilles and develop a sa~e of self-esteem m the proc~
Overall. thc goal of this project would be to give youth xaable alt~-atlve, to neg~ive or
unproductive ways to spend their time In addition to this summer program, the youth
mcmbem who regi~er with Camp Fire are then ehgrble to attend all other Camp Fire
activities that are sponsored withn the Mt Prospect and/or council-wide ama.
Funding for this program allows us to offer a reduced meml:~rstnp fee for youth and
adults wluoh are necessary for this area Additional o0,ts are t-.~hirts for all campem,
re~eshnent_% bus ~vice for field tdps, attml.qsinn costs foi field Mps, and
materhl~Jsupplies for any programn Salaries for stall'support, camp coordinators, and
camp counselors are included m tbs budget
Smcerely, fh
Linnea Ploro
~ Metropohtan Chtcago Councnl of Camp Fire, Inc $¢mng Cook, Lake, cogt McHenry Counttes
AO~lWaV~'o~ncv 203Nordl~aoaah.$ulteI$lS, Ciu,~ugo. Illmut~6{}601 · PF, vr, e(~l~)26~-621g * Fax(312)263-6386
_. EXHIBIT C
FY 2000 HUD LOW-INCOME LIMITS
~ '- Pe~:sohs in'Itous~hold ~ ~ , Income Limits
1 '- $35,150
~ ' !$40,150
3 ~ ' $45,200
~~, ~ -~' - $5o,2oo
5 $54,200~
6 '$58,250
7 $62,250
' }]- $66,250'
Name of Program
Part~cipant's Name
(Please Print)
To participate tn certain federally funded programs, participants must meet certain Income qualifications
I certify that my family/residence meets the income cnterla hsted below.
S~gnature of Head of Household
No. ofPeopleinHousehold Maximum Household Income
1 $35,150
2 40,150
3 ~45,200
4 50,200
5 54,200
6 58,250
7 62,250
8 66,250
Single-Female
Head of Household Yes No
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
...... MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone (847) 818-5328
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT FOR VILLAGE CDBG FUNDS
FISCAL YEAR JANUARY 1, 2000 TO DECEMBER 31, 2000
Applicant Phone
Address
Contact Person
T~tle
Agency F~scal Year
PROGRAM CLIENT STATISTICS
1 Total number of clients served this month
Mount Prospect porbon only
2 Total number of umts of service prowded dunng th~s month
Mount Prospect port~on only
3 Define your"umt ofserwce"
4 Describe all client fees for th~s month
5 Total amount actually received for th~s month from Village
6 Total amount actually used for this month
7 Descnbe any accomphshments achieved by clientele or program
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-NORTHWEST SUBURBAN COUNCIL, INC
FOR THE LEARNING FOR LIFE PROGRAM
V~rlEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect Is a reclplent of funds under the Commumty Development
Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
that the Boy Scouts of America - Northwest Suburban Counc,l, Inc shall provide a Learning for Life
Program originating m south Mount Prospect located wlthln the corporate boundaries of the Village of
Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Boy Scouts of America - Northwest Suburban Council, Inc
and approved here~n, compl,es w~th the reqmrements of the Department of Hous,ng and Urban
Development w~th respect to benefiting low and moderate income persons
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor is hereby authorized to sxgn and the Clerk d~rected to attest h~s
s~gnature on an agreement for Commun,ty Development Block Grant implementat,on, whmh Agreement
is between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Boy Scouts of America- Northwest Suburban Council,
Inc, a copy of which Agreement ~s attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"
SECTION TWO That th~s Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval ~n the manner provided by the law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED this day of March, 2000
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
ATTEST.
Velma W Lowe
Village Clerk
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into this day of 2000, by and between the
Village of Mount Pr6speet, a body public of the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and Boy Scouts -Northwest Suburban Council, Ine, a not-for-profit corporation of
the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the "COUNCIL")
SECTION
Statement of Purpose
As a grantee of Commumty Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U S Department of Honsmg and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services with the COUNCIL for operation of a
Learmng for Life Program as outlined m the Scope of Services attached herewith as Exlubit "A"
SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services with the COUNCIL up to a maximum of
$2,500 00 and the COUNCIL agrees to abide by the provisions and regnlattons of the 1974 Housing
and Conunumty Development Act, as amended under which said contract is made, and to use said
contract funds for the purposes set forth m Section I hereof and as conditioned by the provisions of
Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obhgat~on as identified in Section I shall be lunited to the
mardmum amount specified m Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the COUNCIL, and only
to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes
SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
A Indemmficatlon The COUNCIL agrees to indemmfy and save and hold harmless the
VILLAGE and each and everyone of it's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, insurers
and successors from any and all cltums, demands, causes of actions, expenses injuries, losses or
damages of whatever kand, character of description the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
-1-
cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the fmlure of the COUNCIL, or those actang under
to conform to the statues, ordinances or other regulations or requirements of any governmental
authonty, in connection w~th the COUNCIL's performance under this Agreement The COUNCIL
agrees to defend agmnst any claims brought or actions filed agmnst the VILLAGE w~th respect to
the subject of the ~ndemmty contained herein, whether such claims or actions are rightfully or
wrongfully brought or filed In case of such a clann brought or such an action filed, the COUNCIL
agrees that the VILLAGE may employ attorneys of ~t's own selecUon to appear and defend the claim
or action on behalf of the VILLAGE at the expense of the COUNCIL. The VILLAGE, at ~t's option,
shall have the sole authority for the dlrectmn of the defense, and shall be the sole judge of the
acceptability of any compromise or settlement of any clmms or actions against the VILLAGE
B Non-dlscrinnnatlon The COUNCIL, performing under this Agreement, shall not
d~scnmmate against any worker, employee, or applicant or any member of the public, because of
race, creed, color, sex, age, or national ong~n Such affirmative action shall ~nclude, but not be
lmalted to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, termmataon, compensation,
selection for traunng including apprenticeship The COUNCIL agrees to post in conspicuous places
available to employees and apphcants for employment, notmes setting forth the prowslons of this
non-discriminatory clause This policy of non-d~scnmlnatlon and affirmative actmn shall be
applicable w~th regard to both COUNCIL's ~ntemal personnel practices and ~t's actmns ~n the
performance of this Agreement The COUNCIL agrees and authonzes the VILLAGE and HUD to
conduct comphance rewews or any other procedures to assure comphance w~th these prowslons
C ExaminatlonofRecords The COUNCIL wfll, atalltnnes, glveHUD, the Comptroller
General of the Umted States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized representative, access to,
and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract, ~n
accordance w~th state and federal law ~
D F~hng of Records The COUNCIL shall file vath the VILLAGE such duphcates of
records covering such act~wt~es to be performed ~n whole or in part, as specified ~n Exhibit "A".
E Avmlabfllty of Law, Regulations and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the COUNCIL, prowde ~t w~th copies of all laws, regulations and orders, mcludlng those c~ted in tins
contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant-funded programs, or whmh m~ght
otherwrse affect the performance of this Agreement This agreement includes program income
reqmrements set forth in section 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not apphcable to the COUNCIL and
umform admtmstrat~ve requirements described m section 24 CFR 570.502
-2-
.SECTION IV
Compliance with Laws
The COUNCIL, shall at all times, observe and comply with all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government whmh may in any manner affect the
performance of this Agreement, and the COUNCIL shall be required to perform all acts under this
agreement in the stone manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, is or
would be required to perform such acts Suspension or termination shall occur if the COUNCIL
materially fails to comply with any term of the award in accordance v~th 24 CFR 85 44
.SECTION V
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwith file all
necessary documents with HUD and shall comply with all applicable roles and regulations necessary
to facilitate acquisition of funds approved for this program by HUD The COUNCIL shall not file
any lawsuit against the VILLAGE or any of it% officers or employees as a result of this contract,
except that this Section shall not act as a bar to any lawsuits arising from the negligent acts of the
VILLAGE or any of ifs officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billing and Reporting Arrangements
Pursuant to this Agreement, the VILLAGE will disburse CDBG funds to the COUNCIL on
the followxng basis'
1 The VILLAGE shall allocate the $2,500 00 contract amount for the services
stipulated in.t_has Agreement The COUNCIL shall subnm invoices to the VILLAGE
and a performance report every month This report shall include:
a Monthly Status Report
b Attendance sign-in sheets from each meeting
e. Nuraber of trips taken and number of children on each for the reporting
period.
Each report will be due at the end of the month The COUNCIL shall invoice the VILLAGE
quarterly for a total of four invoices for the Learning for Life Program
-3-
2 A final report shall accompany the COMPANY's final bllhng This report will
highlight the accomplishments of the program over the past twelve months,
summarized for the fiscal year, from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the
number of Mount Prospect Residents served, and include the completion of Exhibit
"B" hereto attached Tlus report shall be due no later than January 10, 2001
a Total salaries,
b Cost of transportat, on,
c Cost of office supphes, program supphes, food and drinks, registration,
,nsurance, adm~ssmn fees, custodial fees and memberships,
d Miscellaneous Identify each
The COUNCIL shall also have completed by the parents or guardians of each cluld
an Apphcatmn Form, us,ng ExhIb~t C Th~s form may be part of the child's
apphcat~on for partmlpatmg ~n the program Smd apphcat~on shall mdmate to the
satisfaction of the Vdlage, each participating child's household annual income as
being below or above current HUD Section 8 Limits Fmlure to submit a completed
application fo the %llage for each partmlpat~ng cluld's household will wolate the
terms of th~s Agreement and cancel any pending and future payments due the
COUNCIL from the VILLAGE
All exhibits, reports and lnvotees must be completed and sent to the Village of Mount Prospect no
later than January 10, 2001
SECTION VII
Length of Contract
TI'ns Agreement shall be valid from January 1, 2000 until December 31, 2000 and may be
terminated by elther party upon tlurty (30) days written notme All costs assocmted wuth noted tasks
in Exhibit A shall be billed to the Village and reimbursed upon presentation of all documents
reqmmd under Section VI
SECTION VIII
Assignments
· The COUNCIL shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the COUNCIL shall
not transfer or assign any funds or clmms due or to become due hereunder w~thout the pnor written
approval of the Village Manager. Any transfer or assignment of funds pursuant to tlus agreement,
either in whole or m part, or any ~nterest therein shall be due to the COUNCIL shall be deemed of
no fume or effect and shall not be binding upon the VILLAGE
-4-
SECTION IX
Notices and Communications
Notmes and commumcat~ons under tlus Agreement shall be sent registered or certffied mall
postage prepared, to the respective part, es as follows'
to the VILLAGE
Mr Wflham J Cooney, Jr.
D~rector of Commumty Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
to the COUNCIL
Mr Alan Brostoff
D~stnct D~rector
Northwest Suburban Council, BSA
600 N Wheehng Road
Mount Prospect, Ilhnois 60056
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST' BY.
President of the Village Board
BOY SCOUTS -NORTHWEST SUBURBAN COUNCIL
Village Clerk COUNCIL, INC an Ilhnois not-for-profit corporation
ATTEST.
BY
~ Director
Notary Pubhc
Proposed New Learning for Life
Programs
In the Village of Mt. Prospect
The mtual purpose for the Northwest Suburban Council's proposal to the Mt
Prospect Community Block Grant program was to start, fund and mmntmn programs at
three new schools m our council, John Jay Elementary, Euclid Elementary and Frost Jr
Htgh The Northwest Suburban Council has since been In contact w~th Linnea Ploro,
Camp Fire, and believes that the students who attend Euclid school would benefit fi.om a
joint program ! am amending my original proposal and asking for $3000 to fund the
Learmng for Life program at Euclid school
The Learning for Life program is designed for all students age K--12* grade and
occurs dunng the regular school day Ail 550 students wall have the opportumty to
participate in the program that will run the 1999-2000 school year Learning for Life vall
meet the school-to-work needs of our schools no matter what thelr needs are
· Career Days
Topic specific speakers
· Cumculm enhancement materials
· Recogmt~on program
· Student interest survey (we wail scan and proxade the results)
· Charts and st~ckers
· Set up Field trips
· Use of camp grounds for lock-ins/outdoor education
· Full time professional
· Potential pamclpat~on m our summer camp programs
Euclid had already shown an Interest m becoming acttve m the Learning for Life
program, but we need the Villages support We have over 25 schools that are currently
Involved wtth our program and these schools, m the most part, are sponsored by the
business ~n their communities Without these funds we vall not be able to promde th~s
program to any of the students at these schools Working vath the Camp Ftre program,
an after school program, we can serve a much larger population from the Euchd school
area
EXHIBIT C
FY 2000 HUD LOW-INCOME LIMITS
Persons in Household Income Limits
1 ............................................. $35,150
2 ........................................... $40,150
3 ......................................... $45,200
4 ......................................... $50,200
5 ......................................... $54,200
6 ......................................... $58,250
7 ......................................... $62,250
8 ......................................... $66,250
Name of Program
Partimpant's Name
(Please Print)
To participate in certain federally funded programs, partm~pants must meet certain income qualifications
I certify that my family/residence meets the income criteria listed below
Signature of Head of Household ....
No. ofPeoplelnHousehold Maximum Household Income
1 $35,150
2 40,150
3 45,200
4 50,200
5 54,200
6 58,250
7 62,250
8 66,250
Smgle-Female
Head of Household Yes No
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone (847) 818-5328
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT FOR VILLAGE CDBG FUNDS
FISCAL YEAR JANUARY 1, 2000 TO DECEMBER 31, 2000
Apphcant Phone
Address
Contact Person
T~tle
Agency F~scal Year
PROGRAM CLIENT STATISTICS
Total number of chents served th~s month
Mount Prospect port,on only
Total number of un~ts of service prowded dunng th~s month
Mount Prospect port~on only
Define your "unit of service".
Describe all chent fees for this month
Total amount actually received for this month from V~llage
Total amount actuaIIy used for th~s month
Describe any accomplishments achieved by chentele or program
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CLAYGROUND, INC
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community Development
Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
that Clayground, Inc shall provide a teaching ceramics/art program for the residents of the Boxwood
Area located within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Clayground, Inc and approved herein, complies with the
requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to benefiting Iow and
moderate income persons
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor Is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to attest his
signature on an agreement for Commun,ty Development Block Grant implementation, which Agreement
Is between the Village of Mount Prospect and Clayground, Inc, a copy of which Agreement is attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"
SECTION TWO That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT.
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
ATTEST
Velma W Lowe
Village Clerk
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into th~s day of 2000, by and between the
V~llage of Mount Prospect, a body pubhc of the State of Ilhnois (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and Clayground, Inc, (hereinafter referred to as the "COMPANY") a not-for-profit
company
SECTION I
Statement of Purpose
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U S Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services with the COMPANY for operation of a
program to fac~htate serwces to low- and moderate-income Mount Prospect ctuldren, many from the
Boxwood neighborhood, as outline in the Scope of Services attached herewith as Exhibit "A".
SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services vnth the COMPANY up to a maximum of
$3,000 00 and the COMPANY agrees to abide by the prowsions and regulations of the 1974
Housing and Community Development Act, as amended under which sa~d contract is made, and to
use smd contract funds for the purposes set forth in Section I hereof and as conditioned by the
prows~ons of Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obhgatlon as identified m Section I shall be hmited to the
maxunum amount specified in Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the COMPANY, and
only to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes
SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
-1-
A Indemmficatlon The COMPANY agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless the
VILLAGE and each and everyone of at's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, ~nsurers
and successors from any and all clmms, demands, causes of actaons, expenses mjuraes, losses or
damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
cause, matter, act, or onnss~on arising out of the failure of the COMPANY, or those acting under
to conform to the statues, ordinances or other regulations or reqmrements of any governmental
authority, ~n connection with the COMPANY's performance under th~s Agreement The
COMPANY agrees to defend against any clanns brought or actaons filed against the VILLAGE w~th
respect to the subject of the mdemmty contmned hereto, whether such clams or actmns are rightfully
or wrongfully brought or filed In case of such a clama brought or such an actaon filed, the
VILLAGE agrees that the COMPANY may employ attorneys of it's own selection to appear and
defend the clmm or action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to reasonable approval by the
VILLAGE, at the expense of the COMPANY. The COMPANY, at ats' option, shall have the sole
authority for the darectxon of the defense
B Non-d~scrun~nataon The COMPANY, perfornnng under thas Agreement, shall not
d~scnminate agmnst any worker, employee, or apphcant or any member of the pubhc, because of
race, creed, color, sex, age, or national origin Such affirmative action shall Include, but not be
hmited to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, termanat~on, compensation,
selectaon for training mcludang apprentmeshap The COMPANY agrees to post in conspacuous
places available to employees and apphcants for employment, not~ces settmg forth the prows~ons
o f tbas non-d~scnminatory clause This pohcy of non-d~scnminatmn and affirmatave action shall be
apphcable with regard to both COMPANY's anternal personnel practmes and frs actions in the
performance of flus Agreement The COMPANY hereby certffies that I-9 forms are current and
employment venficatton has been completed regarding all employees The COMPANY agrees and
authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct comphance reviews or any other procedures to assure
comphance with these pmvlsaons, subject to apphcable laws and regulations concermng privacy w~th
reasonable not,ce to the COMPANY
C Examination of Records The COMPANY will, at all ttmes, give HUD, the Comptroller
General of the United States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized representative, access to,
and the right to exannne all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract, an
accordance w~th state and federal law Said records shall include verification of household income
and mformatton on race or nattonal ongm Eligible households for thts program must have mcomes
below those noted m Exbabat C The COMPANY may estabhsh program income criteria below that
noted m Exlubit C
D Fflmg of Records The COMPANY shall file with the VILLAGE such duplicates of
records covering such actavat~es to be performed m whole or an part, as spectfied an Exhabat "A".
E Availability of Law, Regulattons and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the COMPANY, provide tt w~th copies of all laws, regulataons and orders, anclud~ng those c~ted
this contract, wtuch regulate the operation of the Block Grant funded programs, or which might
otherwise affect the performance of tlus Agreement This agreement includes program income
requirements set forth m section 24 CFR 570.504 (e), but is not applicable to the COMPANY and
uniform admlnlstratlve requirements described in section 24 CFR 570 502
SECTION IV
Compliance with Laws
The COMPANY, shall at all times, observe and comply with all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government which may In any manner affect the
performance of this Agreement, and the COMPANY shall be reqmred to perform all acts under this
agreement in the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, is or
would be required to perform such acts Suspension or termination shall occur if the COMPANY
materially fails to comply vnth any term of the award in accordance wath 24 CFR 85 44
SECTION V
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwith file all
necessary documents v~th HUD and shall comply vnth all applicable roles and regulations necessary
to faeihtate acqmsmon of funds approved for this program by HUD The COMPANY shall not file
any lawsuit against the VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees as a result of this contract,
except that this Section shall not act as a bar to any lawsmts arising from the negligent acts of the
VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billing and Reoortlng Arrangements
Pursuant to this Agreement, the VILLAGE will disburse CDBG funds to the COMPANY
on the following basis
1. The VILLAGE shall allocate the $3,000 00 contract amount for the services
stipulated in this Agreement The COMPANY shall submit one invoice for work
performed under the first six (6) months of this contract and one invoice covenng the
remaining six (6) months Each invoice will be for one-half (V2) of the contract
amount In addition to the invoices, the COMPANY shall submit to the VILLAGE
a monthly status report covering the activities of that month The following
information should also be included
a Attendance sign-in sheets from each meeting
b Number of trips taken and number of children on each for the reporting
period
2 A final report shall accompany the COMPANY's final billing This report vail
hlghhght the accomplishments of the program over the past twelve months,
summarized for the fiscal year, from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the
. number of Mount Prospect Residents served, and include the completion of Exhibit
"B" herein attached This report shall be due no later than January 10, 2001
3 The COMPANY shall also have completed by the parents or guardians of each cbald
an Application Form, using Exhibit C. Tins form may be part of the child's
application for participating in the program. Said application shall indicate to the
satisfaction of the Village, each participating child's household annual income as
being below or above current HUD Section 8 Limits Failure to submit a completed
application to the Village for each participating child's household will violate the
terms of this Agreement and cancel any pending and future payments due the
COUNCIL from the VILLAGE
All exhibits, reports and invoices must be completed and sent to the Village of Mount Prospect no
later than January 10, 2001.
SECTION VII
Length of Contract
This Agreement shall be valid from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by either party upon thirty- (30) days written notice All costs associated with
completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation of all
documentation required under Section VI
SECTION VIII
Assignments
The COMPANY shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the COMPANY
shall not transfer or assign any funds or elmms due or to become due hereunder without the prior
written approval of the Village Manager. Any transfer or assignment of funds pursuant to flus
agreement, e~ther in whole or in part, or any interest thereto shall be due to the COMPANY shall be
deemed of no force or effect and shall not be binding upon the VILLAGE
SECTION IX
Notices and Communications
Notices and communlcat~ons under this Agreement shall be sent registered or certffied mall
postage prepared, to the respective part,es as follows
to the VILLAGE
Mr. Wllharn J Cooney, Jr.
Director of Commumty Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
to the COMPANY
Ms Dmnne M Kovack
President
Clayground, Inc
425 East Euclid Avenue
Mount Prospect, Ilhnms 60056
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST: BY.
President of the Village Board
Village Clerk
CLAYGROUND, INC.
BY.
President
ATTEST
Notary Public
CLAYground, n-,,:.
425 East Euchd Avenue · Mount Prospect IL 60056
Phone (847) 342 MOLD or (847) 342-6653 · Fax (847) 342 9949
March 10, 2000
Ms Misty Das
Neighborhood Planner
100 S Emerson Street
Mount Prospect IL 60056
EXHIBIT A
Boxwood 2000 Ceramic Program
Dear Ms Das
The following program Is applicable to 50 cluldren of low income criteria m the Boxwood area
cluldren of all ages can pamcipate and enjoy the follovang programs
The cost per ctuld is $10 00 a class, our regular cost for these programs would be $13 00 to
$15 00 a class Each chrld will attend approximately 10 1-1/2 to 2 hour classes In these classes
cinldren will learn freehand clay work, throvnng on pottery wheels and freehand construction
Ctuldren wdl also learn techraques in fimslung their creations in stains and glazes They vo_ll be
taught a variety of teehraques m both construction and fimsh
The following classes vail allow-the cluldren mchviduahzed freedom and independence to express
themselves
A) Freehand Construcaon-- they wdl be using both coil and slab teehraques, sculpting and
learning about different types of clays, glazes and firings
B) Pottery Wheel--they wall have the opportunity to throw a bowl, vase, cup etc they wall learn
how to fimsh their piece through clay additions and a variety of glaze techmqucs
C) Casted Ware--the ctuldren were g~ven a number of casted pieces they have already cleaned and
prepared for finng, these pmces have already been fired the first time They will use a number of
different types of'stains or glazes depending on their imagination to fimsh their art
Children can enter their creations in the August compet~tmn at the International Cerarmc
Association convention tn Milwaukee, they w~ll have the opportumty to w~n awards
The above programs are already m existence and have been for the past three years There are
approxtmately 50 children from the Boxwood area who will utfltze th~s program before the end of
the 2000 year
Programs are
Wednesday 3 45to5 15 ctuldren6 to ll yearsold
Wednesday 7 00 to 8 30/9 00 cluldren 12 to 16 years old
Saturday l0 00 to 11 30 ctuldren 6 to 11 years old
The program days and t~mes wmll change in the summer when school ts out
50 Cluldren per each cluld m Program at $10 00 a class for 10 classes $5,000 00
35 Cluldren per each cluld m Program at $10 00 a class for 10 classes $3,500 00
l~sty, I beheve the fundmg allocated for the year 2000 was $3500 00 so the billing for the year
2000 will be $3500 00 regardless of the number ofcluldren who participate or the number of
t~mes they come to class, winch will exceed ! 0 classes m most cases
If you need any other information regarding the above classes, please call
Sincerely,
D~anne Kovack
President, Clayground Inc
EXHIBIT C
FY 2000 HUD LOW-INCOME LIMITS
Persons in Household Income Limits
1 ........................... '. .................. $35,150
2 .............................................. $40,150
3 .............................................. $45,200
4 .............................................. $50,200
5 .............................................. $54,200
6 .............................................. $58,250
7 .............................................. $62,250
8 .............................................. $66,250
Name of Program
Parttmpant's Name
(Please Print)
To parttmpate in certain federally funded programs, participants must meet certmn ~ncome qualifications
I certify that my family/residence meets the income cnterxa hsted below
Signature of Head of Household ~
No. of People in Household Maximum Household Income
1 $35,150
2 .... 40,150
'3 45,200
~ 4. .. 50,200
5 54,200
6 58,250
7 62,250
8 66,250
Single-Female
Head of Household Yes No
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone (847) 818-5328
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT FOR VILLAGE CDBG FUNDS
FISCAL YEAR JANUARY 1, 2000 TO DECEMBER 31, 2000
Applicant Phone
Address
Contact Person
T~Ue
Agency F~scal Year
PROGRAM CLIENT STATISTICS
I Total number of clients served th~s month
Mount Prospect port,on only
2 Total number of umts of service prowded dunng th~s month
Mount Prospect port~on only
3 Define your"unlt of service"
4 Describe all client fees for th~s month
5 Total amount actually received for th~s month from Village
6 Total amount actually used for th~s month
7 Describe any accomplishments achieved by clientele or program
KESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CLUB REC PLEX
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect ts a remplent of funds under the Community Development
Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, ~t has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect
that Club Rec Plex shall prowde a Friday evening youth program for the residents of the Village of
Mount Prospect m the corporate boundar~as of the Village of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by Club Rec Plex and approved hereln, compiles w,th the
requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development w~th respect to benefiting low and
moderate income persons
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor IS hereby authorized to s,gn and the Clerk directed to attest h~s
s~gnature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant ,mplementatlon, which Agreement
~s between the Village of Mount Prospect and Club Rec Plex, a copy of wh,ch Agreement ~s attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exh,b,t "A"
SECTION TWO That th,s Resolution shall be m full force and effect from and after ,ts passage and
approval in the manner provided by the law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED th~s day of ~ 2000
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
A'ITEST
Velma W Lowe
Village Clerk
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into this day of 2000, by and between the
Village of Mount Prospect, a body pubhe of the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and Club Rec Plex, Ine, (hereinafter referred to as the "COMPANY") a not-for-profit
company
SECTION
Statement'of Purpose'
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG fuads) by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services with the COMPANY for operation of a
program to facilitate services to low- and moderate-income Mount Prospect children, as outlined in
the Scope of Services attached herewith as Exhibit "A".
SECTION II ~
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services with the COMPANY up to a maxtmum of
$2,000 00 and the COMPANY agrees to abide by the provisions and regulations of the 1974
Housing and Community Development Act, as amended under wbaeh said contract is made, and to
use said contract funds for the purposes set forth in Section I hereof and as conditioned by the
provisions of Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified in Section I shall be limited to the
maximum amount specified in Section II, to the aetuai amount invoiced by the COMPANY, and
only to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes
SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
-1-
A Indemnification The COMPANY agrees to Indemnify and save and hold harmless the
VILLAGE and each and everyone of it's officers, agents, employee, s,~servants, attorneys, i ,ns~urers
and successors from any and all clams, demands, causes of actions, expenses mjurles, losses or
damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the fmlure of the COMPANY, or those acting under it,
to conform to the statues, ordinances or other regulations or requirements of any governmental
authority, in connection wath the COMPANY's performance under this Agreement The
COMPANY agrees to defend agamst any cl~'mbrought or actions filed agamst the VILLAGE w~th
respect to the subject of the indemnity contained hereto, whether such clanns or actions are rightfully
or wrongfully brought or filed In case of such a claim brought or such an action' filed, the
VILLAGE agrees that the COMPANY rhay employ att/)meys of it's ov~h delectlon to appear and
defend the clam of action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to reasonable approval by the
VILLAGE, at the expense of the COMPANY. The COMPANY, ~at i,ts' option, shall have the sole
authority for the direction of the defense.
B Non-discrimination The COMPANY, performing under this Agreement, shall not
discriminate against any worker, employee,~)r~apphcant or any member of the pubhe, because of
race, creed, color, sex, age, or national ongm Such affirmative action shall include, but not be
limited to the followmg: employment, ul~gradmg, demotion or transfer, termination, compensation,
selection for training including apprenticeship The COMPANY agrees to post in conspicuous
places avalable to employees and applicants for employment, notices s~ettmg forth thd provisions
of tins non-discriminatory clause This p6hcy of non-discrimination and affirmative action'shall be
apphcable with regard to both COMPANY's internal personnel practices and it's actions in the
performance of this Agreement ~ The COMPANY hereby certifies that 1-9 forms are c~rrent and
employment verification has been completed regardmg all employees Tl/e COMPANY agrees and
authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct compliance reviews or any other Procedures to assure
comi~liancd wath these~prowslous, subject to applicable laws and regulations concerning pnvacy wath
reasonable notice to the COMPANY
C. Examinatmn of Records The COMPANY wall, at all t~mes, give HUD, the Comptroller
General of the United States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized representative, access to,
and the right to examme all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract, in
accordance wath state and federal law. Sad records shall mclude verification of household income
and information on race or national ongm Eligible households for tins program must have incomes
below those noted m Exinblt C The COMPANY may establish program income criteria below that
noted in Exhibit C.
D Filing of Records The COMPANY shall file with the VILLAGE such duplicates of
records covering such activities to be performed in whole or in part, as specified in Exhibit "A"
E AvaIlabihty.ofLaw, Regulations and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the COMPANY, provide it wath copies of all laws, regulations and orders, including those cited in
tins contract, winch regulate the operation 6f the Block Grant funded programs, or winch might
otherwise affect the performance of tins Agreement This agreement includes program income
reqmrements set forth in section 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not applicable to the COMPANY and
umform admimstrattve requirements described tn section 24 CFR 570 502.
SECTION IV
Comphance with Laws
The COMPANY, shall at all trines, observe and comply vnth all laws, ordtnances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government wtuch may tn any manner affect the
perfonuance of this Agreement, and the COMPANY shall be reqmred to perform all acts under this
agreement tn the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, is or
would be required to perform such acts Suspeasion or termination shall occur if the COMPANY
materially fmls to comply with any term of the award in accordance vath 24 CFR 85 44
SECTION V
Submission to HUD ~,
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwth file all
necessary documents w~th HUD and shall comply wtth all apphcable rules and regulattons necessary
to facilitate acqmsition of funds approved for this program by HUD The COMPANY shall not file
any lawsuit agmnst the VILLAGE or any of at's officers or employees as a result of this contract,
except that thts Section shall not act as a bar to any lawsmts arising from the neghgent acts of the
VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billine and Reoorting Arrangements
Pursuant to tlus Agreement, the VILLAGE'wfil dtsburse CDBG funds to the COMPANY
on the following basis:
1. The VILLAGE shall allocate the $2,000 00 contract amount for the servtces
stipulated in tlus Agreement. The COMPANY shall subnut one tnvotce b~-monthly.
Each invoice will be for one-stxth of the contract amount In addttmn to the
invmces, the COMPANY shall submit to the VILLAGE a monthly status report
covenng the acttvtties of that month The follow~ng tnformatton should also be
included
a Attendance sign-tn sheets from each meeting
b Number of trips taken and number of children on each for the reporting
period
2 A final report shall accomp~n~ the~ COMPANY's final billing This report will
highlight the accomplishments of the program over the past twelve months,
summarized for the fiscal year, from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the
number of Mount Prospect Residents served, and include the completion of Exinblt
"B" herein attached. This report shall be due no later than January~ 10, 2001.
~ The COMPANY shall also have completed by the parents or guardians of each cinld
an Application Form, using Exhibit C' Tins forni may be part of the child's
applicataon for participating in the progranl Said application shall indicate to the
satisfaction of the Village, each participating child's hofisehold annual income as
being below or above current HUD Section 8 Limits Failure to submit a completed
apphcatlon to the Village for each participating child's household will wolate the
terms of this Agreement and cancel any pending and future payments due the
COMPANY from the VILLAGE
All exhibits, reports and mvomes must be completed and sent to the Village of Mount Prospect no
later than January 10, 2001.
~'~ ~ : ~ SECTION VII '
~ , Length of Contract
This Agreement shall be valid from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by either party upon tinrty- (30) days written notice All costs associated with
completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation of all
documentation required under Section VI
SECTION VIII
Assignments ~ ' '
The COMPANY shall not assign the Agreement dr any part thereof and the COMPANY
shall not transfer or assign any funds or claims due or to become due hereunder w~thout the prior
written approval of the Village Manager ~May transfer or a~slgnmant of funds pursuant to this
agreement, either m whole or m part, or any interest therein shall be due to the COMPANY shall be
deemed of no force or effect and shall not be binding upon the VILLAGE
-I
SECTION IX
Notices and Communications
Notices and commumcatlons under flus Agreement shall be sent registered or certified mall
postage prepared, to the respective parties as follows
to the VILLAGE
Mr. William J. Cooney, Jr
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
to the COMPANY
Ms Sharon Anderson
Program Manager
Club Ree P1ex
420 Dempster Street
Mount Prospect, Ilhnms 60056
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST: BY:
President of the Village Board
Village Clerk
CLUB REC PLEX
BY
Program Manager
ATTEST:
Notary Public
Mt. Prospect Park District ..
Serving Portions of Mt Prospect · Des Plalnes · Arhngton Heights · EII~ Grove Village
RE: Village of Mt. Prospect Community Development Block Grant
Sponsoring Agency Mt Prospect Park District
Block Grant Project: Club RecPlex
Location KecPlex (a facility of thc Mt Prospect Park District)
,, 420 West Dempstcr St
Mt Prospect, IL 60056
847-640-1000
Dates/Times Friday evenings 6-10 30pm (year-round for the past 7 years)
Target Audience 6a --, 10n graders
Club RecPlex is a well supervtse(~, structured recreational program for 6~ - 10~
graders every Friday evening year-round Pamc~pants arc permitted
use of the recreauonal amemties evadable at RecPlex. the gymnasiums, wallyball
courls, racquetball courts, swimming pool and lounge area Park D~strict staff
proxades a safe, user friendly place for these young teenagers to socialize on Friday
evenings
There are special events for the part~opants meh
party, a back to school dance, a w~ntcr jump rope contest and pizza parties, all as
funds become available
Club R. ecPlex teens may use their RecPlex membership card for free admismon, all
other teens are adnutted for $1 00 offthe regular rate ~fthey have their parents
simply sign a free Club RecPlex reDstranon tom RecPiex youth resident fee is
$4 00, with the Club RccPlex discount card the teen would pay $3 00 per evemng
Th~s year we have not received any other funding sources for thls program Club
RecPlex averages between 75 to 200 youth pet evemng While school ts tn session
attendance is higher than dunng the summer months
The park dmrict staffcosts speofic to the Club Rcc?lex program includes
Club RecPlex Supervisor $5,000
Gym A~s,~tant 1,375
Facdt~ Rover 1,375
Check-m Attendant 750
Total Annual Salanc~ $8,500
~'420 West Dempste~ Srreel', Mt Prospect, IL 60056 · 847-640-1000 · fox 8474,qb4-~8~-4
Page 2 Club RecPlex Block Grant Project
The Mt Prospect Park Dtstnct works tn ~oop~atJon w~th TAP, School Dismct
214 (Prospect, Elk Grove and Rolhng Meadows High Schools), School Distant
#59 (Fnendslup and Holmes Jr t-figh School?) and Dssmct #57 ('Lin~,oln Jr I-hgh
School) to promote this youth program and to secure volunteers
In the wake of thc Columbine I-hgh School tragedy and other threats of school
xaolcnce, on May 20, 1999 the U S Senate approved S 254, the Violent and
Repeat Juvemle Accountabd:ty and P,~ehabtlttat~on Act The bdl contmns language
that rccogmz~ the value ofrecrearmn-as-prevemtmn The Ju&e.m~ conmuttee
also recograzed the expert:se and resources ofpubhc recreation authont~e.q m
addressing the needs and demands of young people Thc particular demands of
young people for secure enwronments and access to caring adults
places is specifically ldenttfied Research shows that when a child is involved with
orgamzed, structured leisure programs, they are less hkely to pursue deviant types
ofactlvities in their leisure t~me ConsMenng what taxpayers pay to incarcerate
one youth for juvenile crimes one quarter of that amount could be spent on th~s
program to service hundreds of children, makang a long-term inv~ru'nent in the
youth of our commumty
Club ReePlex provide~ a structured let~ure program for the youth of our
community in n seei~re environment with access to earing adults, by doing so
Club Reellex is providing our t~ns with strategies to prevent anti-social and
criminal aetav~ty before it occurs.
The Com"muaity Devel~opment Block Grant is crucial to the e~}utmued success
of Club R.ec.Plex.
Submitted on behalf of the Mt Prospect Park District, Club-RecPlex
Sharon L Anderson
Manager 0fRecrcaUon Faclhues
March 16, 2000
'- -~ EXHIBIT C
' ' ~ FY 2000 HUD Low--~NCOME-LIMITS~
Persons in Household !~.. ~ ~ Income Limits
1 ..... ~. $35,150
~ ' $40,150
3 ~ I ~ $45,200
~ '.. ' $5o12oo
'7 .............................................. ~ tI i $62,250
8 ' i $66,250
Name of Program , ~
Parttc~panfs Name
(Please Pnn0
To participate in certain federally funded programs, participants must meet certain income qualifications
I certify that my family/residence meets the income criteria listed below
Signature of Head of Household
No. of People in Household Maximum Household Income
1 $35,150
2 40,150
3 45,200
4 50,200
5 54,200
6 58,250
7 62,250
8 66,250
Single-Female
Head of Household Yes No
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone (847) 818-5328
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT FOR VILLAGE CDBG FUNDS
FISCAL YEAR JANUARY 1, 2000 TO DECEMBER 31, 2000
Apphcant Phone
Add-res~ ~ ~
Contact Person ', ' ~
T~tle ~ '
Agency Fiscal Year ~
PROGRAM CLIENT STATISTICS
I Total number of chents serve~l th~s month ~'
Mount Prospect port~on only
2 Total number of un,ts of service provided dunng thcs month
Mount Prospect port~on only
3 Define your"unit of service"
4 Describe all chent fees for th~s month
5 Total amount actually received for th~s month from Village
6 Total amount actually used for th~s month
7 Descnbe any accomphshments achieved by chentele or program
RESOLUTION NO
A KESOLUTION AUTHOKIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGKEEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE CEDA NORTHWEST SELF-HELP CENTER
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect Is a remptent of funds under the Community Development Block
Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, ~t has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the VHlage of Mount Prospect
that the CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center shall provtde a trans,tmnal hying program and shall create an
employment resource center to assist near homeless and homeless low and moderate ~ncome residents of the
VHlage of Mount Prospect, and
WHEREAS, the program and project proposed by the CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center and approved
herein, comphes w~th the reqmrements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development w~th respect
to benefiting low and moderate- ~neome persons
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That the Mayor ~s hereby authorized to stgn and the Clerk d~rected to attest h~s sxgnature
on an agreement for Commumty Development Block Grant ~mplementatton, whmh Agreement is between
the VHlage of Mount Prospect and the CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, for the prowsion of a Trans~tmnal
L~ving Program, a copy of whmh Agreement ~s attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit
SECTION TWO That the Mayor ~s hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to attest h,s s~gnature
on an agreement for Commumty Development Block Grant ~mplementation, which Agreement is between
the Village of Mount Prospect and the CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, for the creatmn of Employment
Resource Center, a copy of which Agreement ~s attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhxb~t
SECTION THREE That th~s Resolution shall be m full force and effect from and aRer its passage and
approval m the manner prowded by the law
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED th~s day of ,2000
Gerald L Farley, Mayor
ATTEST.
Velma W Lowe, Village Clerk
i
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into this day of 2000, by and between the
Village of Mount Prospect, a body public of the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and the CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, Inc (hereinafter referred to as the
"CORPORATION") a not-for-profit Corporation
SECTION I
Statement of Purpose
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services w~th the CORPORATION for operation of
a program to assist near homeless and homeless low- and moderate-income residents of the Village
of Mount Prospect as outline in the Scope of Services attached herevath as Exhibit "A"
SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services vath the CORPORATION up to a
maximum of $5,750 for the Transitional Apartment Living Program, and the CORPORATION
agrees to abide by the provisions and regulations of the 1974 Honsmg and Community Development
Act, as amended under wlueh smd contract is made, and to use said contract funds for the purposes
set forth in Section I hereof and as conditioned by the provisions of Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified in Section I shall be hmlted to the
maximum amount specified in Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the CORPORATION,
and only to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes
SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
A Indemmficat~on The CORPORATION agrees to mdemmfy and save and hold harmless
the VILLAGE and each and everyone of it's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, insurers
and successors from any and all clmms, demands, causes of actions, expenses injuries, losses or
damages of whatever l~nd, character of description the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
-1~
cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the failure of the CORPORATION, or those acting
under it, to conform to the statues, ordinances or other regulations or requirements of any
governmental authority, In connecUon with the CORPORATION's performance under this
Agreement The CORPORATION agrees to defend agmnst any claims brought or actions filed
agmnst the VILLAGE with respect to the subject of the lndenmlty contained herein, whether such
claims or actions are rightfully or wrongfully brought or filed In case of such a claim brought or
such an action filed, the VILLAGE agrees that the CORPORATION may employ attorneys of it's
own selection to appear and defend the claim or action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to
reasonable approval by the VILLAGE, at the expense of the CORPORATION The
CORPORATION, at its option, shall have the sole authority for the direction of the defense
B Non-discrimination The CORPORATION, performing under flus Agreement, shall not
discriminate against any worker, employee, or applicant or any member of the pubhe, because of
race, creed, color,'sex, age, or national origin Such affirmative action shall include, but not be
llmlted to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, termination, compensation,
selection for training Including apprenticestnp The CORPORATION agrees to post in conspicuous
places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions
of flus non-discruninatory clause This policy of non-discrimination and affirmative action shall be
applicable with regard to both CORPORATION's internal personnel practices and it's actions in the
performance of flus Agreement The CORPORATION hereby certifies that I-9 forms are current
and employment verification has been completed regarding all employees The CORPORATION
agrees and authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct compliance reviews or any other
procedures to assure compliance with these provisions, subject to applicable laws and regulations
concermng privacy with reasonable notice to the CORPORATION ~
C .Examination of Records The CORPORATION will, at all times, give HUD, the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized representative,
access to, and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract,
m accordance with state and federal law Smd records shall include verification of household income
and information on race or national origin Eligible households for flus program must have incomes
below those noted m Exhibit C. The CORPORATION may establish program income criteria below
that noted in Exhibit C
D Filing of Records The CORPORATION shall file with the VILLAGE such duplicates
of records covenng such activities to be performed in whole or In part, as specified m Exhibit "A".
E Availability of Law, Regulations and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the CORPORATION, provide It with copies of all laws, regulations and orders, maludmg those cited
in flus contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant funded programs, or which might
otherwise affect the performance of this Agreement This agreement includes program ~ncome
-2-
reqmrements set forth m section 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not apphcable to ihe CORPORATION
and uniform admlmstratlve requirements described ~n section 24 CFR 570 502
SECTION IV
Compliance with Laws
The CORPORATION, shall at all t~mes, observe and comply vath all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government which may in any manner affect the
performance oftlus Agreement, and the CORPORATION shall be required to perform all acts under
this agreement in the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, is
or would be required to perform such acts Suspension or termination shall occur if the
CORPORATION materially fails to comply w~th any term of the award in accordance wth 24 CFR
85 44
SECTION V
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the executton of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthv~th file all
necessary documents with HUD and shall comply wtth all applicable rules and regulations necessary
to facilitate acquisition of ftmds approved for this program by HUD The CORPORATION shall
not file any lawsmt agamst the VILLAGE or any of ~t's officers or employees as a result of this
contract, except that ttus Section shall not act as a bar to any lawsuits ansmg from the negligent acts
of the VILLAGE or any of~t's officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billing and Reoortine Arraneements
Pursuant to thrs Agreement, the VILLAGE will d~sburse CDBG funds to the
CORPORATION on the followang basis
1 The VILLAGE shall allocate the $5,750 00 contract amount for the services
stipulated m tlus Agreement The CORPORATION shall submxt no more than one
invoice every month for an amount equal to one-twelfth of the contract amount
-3-
Eve~ month, the CORPORATION shall submit to the VILLAGE a Monthly Status
Report Smd report shall include information on
a Each Mount Prospect resident provided housing and other serwces during the
month, shovang the chent's CORPORATION number, chent's address, and
type(s) of serwce rendered Services may also include the number of
applications received and the number of apphcants approved for the program
from Mount Prospect residents
2 A final report shall accompany the CORPORATION's final billing and report no later
than January 10, 2001. Tlus report vall highlight the accomphshments of the
program over the past year, summarize for the fiscal year, from January 1, 2000 to
December 31, 2000, the number of Mount Prospect Residents served by type of
assistance, and ~nclude the completion of Extub~t B hereto attached
SECTION VII
Length of Contract
This Agreement shall be vahd from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by either party upon tlurty-(30) days written notice All costs assocmted w~th
completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation of all
documentation required under Section VI
SECTION VIII
Assignments
The CORPORATION shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the
CORPORATION shall not transfer or assign any funds or claims due or to become due hereunder
xznthout the prior written approval of the Village Manager Any transfer or assignment of funds
pursuant to thxs agreement, either ~n whole or m part, or any interest thereto shall be due to the
CORPORATION shall be deemed of no force or effect and shall not be~ binding upon the VILLAGE
-4-
SECTION IX
Notices and Communications
Notmes and eommumcat~ons under this Agreement shall be sent registered or certffied mad postage
prepared, to the respective parties as follows
to the VILLAGE
Mr William J Cooney, .Ir
D~reetor of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Ilhnois 60056
to the CORPORATION
Mr Lyle Q Foster
Director
CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, Inc
1300 W Northwest H~ghway
Mount Prospect, Ilhnois 60004
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST' BY.
President of the Village Board
CEDA NORTHWEST SELF-HELP
Village Clerk CENTER, INC
ATTEST'
BY
D~rector
Notary Pubhc
-5-
EXHIBIT A
ADMINISTRATION
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this manual Is to provide a written outline of the areas of
respons,bd~ty for both the management and staff of CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center,
Inc m Participant relationship with regard to the Transitional Living Program
CEDA NORTHWEST BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Thc Board of D~rector of CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, Inc is responsible
for the policy, operation and implementation of the program, as well as fiscal oversight
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CEDA NORTHWEST:
The Executive Director is responsible to the Board of D~rectors It is the Execuuve
Director's responsibility to carry out the policy and d~rectlons of the Board of D~rectors as
they are approved
The Executive D~rector is also responsible to the Executive Director, CEDA of
Cook County, Ine, and CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, Ine and is responsible for all
liaison between the two orgamzauons
The Executive D~rector is also responsible for all program functions, as well as
personnel at CEDA Northwest, and through the Operauons Coordinator and Program
Services Coordinator, is responsible for the development and implementataon of both
program structure and content
PROGRAM SERVICES COORDINATOR:
The Program Services Coordinator has the direct responslbflity for program
content, Participant contact, and staff performance, ensuring that all parts of the program
are structure to meet the stated objectives, and providing comprehensive Case Management
to all Participants in a manner that vall meet all program objectives
BUSINESS MANAGER
The Business Manager has d~rect responstbfi~ty for both financial and dtrect
property management on a day-to-day basis for the agency In conjunction w~th the
Executive D~rector, the Business Manager will collect and d~sburse funding, work on
funding proposals as designated, and provide for physical plant oversight, to ensure that
property owned by the agency is maintained in good operating condttion The Business
Manager will also, as d~reeted by the Executive Director, prowde input and coordination of
all CEDA programs as reqmred
HOUSING SPECIALIST:
This Staff posit~on reports to the Program Services Coordinator, and is the key
retake assessment position for the Transitional Housing Program The Participants are
evaluated to make sure they meet all the basic requirements for the program, and if all
requirements are met, are recommended to the Program Services Coordinator for
consideration for the program
HOUSING ASSISTANT:
This Staff posttion reports to the Program Serv~ce~ Coordinator, and works xn
conjunction with the Housing Spec~al~st to provide for ~ntake assessment and
recommendation for the program
EMPLOYMENT SPECIALIST:
This staff position reports to the Program Services Coordinator, and provides the job
seeker wxth the necessary tools to be competitive in the job market Service may include
resume preparation, .lob referral, and job training, i£ necessary, m order to place the
Parhc~pant in the best posmon available that they are qualified/'or
BUDGET AND FINANCIAL COUNSELOR:
The Budget and F~nancial Counselor reports to the Program Services coordinator, and ~s
responsible for developing a day-today budget, estabhshmg a savings plan, and prowding
financial consultation to the Partxc~pant 'Flus positxon also mamtmns customer accounts for
all Participants in the housing program
2
THE PROGRAM
THE PURPOSE:
THE TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM offers a commumty of people who
wdl revolve themselves )n relationships with the farmhes in the program to provide
practmal assistance and care It ts the intent of the program to assist families in locating
permanent housmg in the community and achieve self-suffimency
HOW IT WORKS:
ALL CANDIDATES FOR THE PROGRAM MUST ;
1 Complete the CEDA Northwest assessment process
2 Meet all quahficat, ons of the program (See Program Policies)
3 Go through a three-step process
A Be recommended by a Housing Counselor for conslderatlon for the program
B Be recommended by the Program Servmes Coordinator for consideration for the
program
C Attend a group interv:ew with all members of the family who will be living in the
umt and be approved by the team for partmtpatton in the program
4 Stgn a CEDA/SELF-HELP CO--CT This contract is not valid untd properly
author=ed by CEDA Northwest personnel (See page 7)
5 ABIDE BY ALL OF THE PROVISIONS IN THE CEDAJSELF-HELP CONTRACT
6 Head of household must have income
7 In order to tmuate your mandatory savings account, a deposit will be required
immediately
8 A $150 service fee is required at the start of the program
9 All Partm:pants must donate five (5) volunteer hours of servme while a resident in the
Transmonal L:mng Program
PROGRAM POLICIES
1) CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPANT ADMISSION:
a) Must be homeless
b) Limned resources
e) One employable adult m family
d) Must have potential for economic self-sufficiency at the end of the program
e) Must sign CEDAYSELF-HELP CONTRACT
f) Partmipant with last permanent address m our area will be given preference
g) Must have income
2) EMPLOYMENT RULES:
a) Any Participant fired from lns/her job for poor performance may be asked to
leave the program
b) Any Participant who is laid off will immediately report this to the Program
Services Coordinator,
e) A Participant may not quit a job without the Program Services Coordinator's
approval, or they may be asked to leave the program
d) A Participant may not be late, leave, or miss work to take care of other matters
without StatT approval
3) BUDGET RULES:
a) Participants must keep receipts of momes spent every dollar must be
accounted for These are to be reviewed by the Financial Counselor at each
meeting
b) Participants must provide copy of ALL check stubs from jobs to the Financial
Counselor
c) There will be no borrowing or loaning ofmomes
d) AT LEAST 30% of all income earned will be placed in a savings accoum
controlled by the Financial Counselor Any variation in this role will reqmre a
signed agreement from both the Financial Counselor and the Program Semces
Coordinator
e) No savings withdrawal may be made without the approval of both the Financial
Counselor and the Program Services Coordinator
f) Participants are responsible for their own phones and unusually high utility
b~lls
4
4) MEEThNG RULES:
a) ALL M~EETINGS ARE MANDATORY. AND A MISS~F.D ~[EETING MAy
[51~ CAUSE FOR REMOVAL FROM TIq~ PROGRAM.
b) Meet regularly with the Program Servzces Coordinator (usually once per week)
Contact Program Services Coordinator ¢~rectly if changes are needed
c) Meet on a periodic basis with the Financial Counselor
d) Must attend weekly job club, if unemployed
e) Meet periodically with the Employment Counselor to assess employment
status
f) Participants must contact the appropriate staff person d~rectly Leaving a
message without speaking to the appropriate staff person will be considered
unacceptable
,l) MAITENANCE RULES FOR LIVING QUARTERS'
-a) Any costs associated with repairs that were caused by Participant neglect and/or
- replacement of hvmg quarters, equipment and/or furnishings in the living umt
will become the Pamclpants' responsibihty and will be deducted from their
savings account prior to the conclusion of their program stay
b) The Participant will agree to maantam the living quarters in a clean, well-
maintained condition Tins includes keeping the apartment vacuumed, dishes
washed and put away, bathroom fixtures scrubbed, and clothes picked up Any
unusual costs for the cleamng or repair of a urut at the Pamcipants' departure .
will be deducted from the Participants' sawng account prior to the final closing
of the account by the Financial Counselor
c) The Participant will assume the financial responsibility for any Ei~ERGENC~'
SITUATION which has been created or caused by them, on weekends or aider
Participants will be required to pay for all repair work, plus a 10%
administrative fee This cost will be submitted to the Financial Counselor for
reimbursement to the agency from the Participants' sawngs account
d) All adult Participants MUST attend the support group
e) Any v~olauon of these rules will be cause for immediate dismissal from the
program., and a twenty-four hour vacate notice of the living unit
EXHIBIT C
FY 2000 HUD LOW-INCOME LIMITS
Persons in Household Into'me Limits
1 ............................. ~. ............... $35,150
2 ~ $40,150
3 ............................................ $45,200
4 ............................................ $50,200.
5 ............................................ $54,200
6 ............................................ $58,250
7 ............................................ $62,250
8 ' $66,250
Name of Program
Partm~pant's Name
(Please Print)
To participate in certain federally funded programs, participants must meet certain income qualifications
I certify that my family/rest&nee meets the income criteria listed below
Signature of Head of Household
No. of People in Household Maximum Household Income -
1 $35,150
2 40,150
3 45,200
4 50,200
5 54,200
6 58,250
7 62,250
8 66,250
Single-Female
Head of Household Yes No
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone (847) 818-5328
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT FOR VILLAGE CDBG FUNDS
FISCAL YEAR JANUARY 1, 2000 TO DECEMBER 31, 2000
Applicant Phone
Address
Contact Person
T~tle
Agency F~scal Year
PROGRAM CLIENT STATISTICS
1 Total number of clients served th~s month
Mount Prospect port~on only
2 Total number of un,ts of service provided during this month
Mount Prospect portion only
3 Define your"umt of serwce"
4 Describe all client fees for th~s month -
5 Total amount actually received for th~s month from Village
6 Total amount actually used for th~s month
7 Describe any accomplishments achieved by clientele or program
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into flus __.day of 2000, by and between the
Village of Mount Prospect, a body pubhe of the State of Ilhnom (hereinafter referred to as the
"VILLAGE" and the CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, Inc (hereinafter referred to as the
"CORPORATION") a not-for-profit Corporation
SECTION I
Statement of Purpose
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to as
CDBG funds) by the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to
as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services vnth the CORPORATION for creation of an
employment resource center to assist near homeless and homeless low- and moderate-income
residents of the Village of Mount Prospect as outline in the Scope of Services attached herewuth as
Exhibit "A".
SECTION II
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for servmes with the CORPORATION up to a
maximum of $15,000 00 for improvements to the facility located at 1300 W. Northwest Highway,
Mount Prospect, specifically $15,000 to expand the footprint of the bmld~ng to create an
employment resource center The CORPORATION agrees to abide by the provisions and
regnlat~ons of the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act, as amended under which smd
contract ~s made, and to use smd contract funds for the purposes set forth In Section I hereof and as
conditioned by the provisions of Section III next
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified m Section I shall be limited to the
maxunum amount specified in Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the CORPORATION,
and only to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes
SECTION III
Conditions of Contract
A Indemmfieat~on The CORPORATION agrees to indemmfy and save and hold harmless
the VILLAGE and each and everyone of it's officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, insurers
-1-
and successors from any and all clams, demands, causes of actions, expenses injuries, losses or
damages of whatever kind, character of descnptlon the VILLAGE may suffer as a result of any
cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the failure of the CORPORATION, or those achng
under It, to conform to the statues, ordinances or other regulations or requirements of any
governmental authority, in connection w~th the CORPORATION's performance under tins
Agreement The CORPORATION agrees to defend against any clams brought or actaons filed
aganst the VILLAGE w~th respect to the subject of the lndemmty contmned herein, whether such
clams or actions are rightfully or wrongfully brought or filed In case of such a claim brought or
such an action filed, the VILLAGE agrees that the CORPORATION may employ attorneys of it's
own selection to appear and defend the claim or action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to
reasonable approval by the VILLAGE, at the expense of the CORPORATION The
CORPORATION, at its option, shall have the sole authority for the direction of the defense
B Non-d~scnminatlon The CORPORATION, performing under this Agreement, shall not
discriminate aganst any worker, employee, or applicant or any member of the public, because of
race, creed, color, sex, age, or national ongln Such affirmative action shall include, but not be
limited to the follounng employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, termination, compensatton,
selection for tranmg lncludmg apprentmeslup The CORPORATION agrees to post in conspicuous
places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions
of tins non-dlscnmmatory clause This pohcy of non-dlscrlmmataon and affirmatsve action shall be
applicable with regard to both CORPORATION's internal personnel pmctmes and it's actions in the
performance of tins Agreement The CORPORATION hereby certifies that 1-9 forms are current
and employment verification has been completed regarding ail employees The CORPORATION
agrees and authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct compliance reviews or any other
procedures to assure compliance with these provisions, subject to applicable laws and regulations
concermng privacy with reasonable notice to the CORPORATION
C Examination of Records The CORPORATION will, at all times, give HUD, the
Comptroller General of the Umted States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized representative,
access to, and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the contract,
in accordance with state and federal law Smd records shall include verification of household income
and information on race or national ongun Eligible households for tins program must have mcomes
below those noted in Exhibit C
D Filing of Records The CORPORATION shall file with the VILLAGE such duplicates
of records covenng such activities to be performed in whole or m part, as specified in Exinbit "A"
E Avalablhty of Law, Regulations and Orders The VILLAGE shall, upon the request of
the CORPORATION, provide it wsth copies of all laws, regulataons and orders, mcludmg those cited
in this contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant funded programs, or which might
-2-
otherwise affect the performance of this Agreement This agreement includes program income
requirements set forth In section 24 CFR 570 504 (c), but is not applicable to the CORPORATION
and uniform administrative requirements described in section 24 CFR 570 502
SECTION IV
Compliance with Laws
The CORPORATION, shall obtain building perrmts bom the Village of Mount Prospect and
shall at all times observe and comply with all laws, ordinances or regulations of the Federal, State,
County and local government which may in any manner affect the performance of this Agreement,
and the CORPORATION shall be required to perform all acts under this agreement in the same
manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the Federal Government, is or would be reqmred to
perform such acts Suspension or tenmnat~on shall occur if the CORPORATION materially fails to
comply w~th any term of the award in accordance w~th 24 CFR 85 44
SECTION V
Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwith file all
necessary documents w~th HUD and shall comply w~th all applicable roles and regulations necessary
to facilitate acquisition of funds approved for this program by HUD. The CORPORATION shall
not file any lawsuit against the VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees as a result of this
contract, except that thts Sectton shall not act as a bar to any lawsmts arising from the negligent acts
of the VILLAGE or any of it's officers or employees
SECTION VI
Billing and Reporting Arrangements
Pursuant to th~s Agreement, the VILLAGE will disburse CDBG funds to the
CORPORATION on the follovnng basis
1 The VILLAGE shall allocate the $15,000 00 contract amount for the services
stipulated in this Agreement The CORPORATION shall submit lnvomes for work
completed, respected and approved by Village Inspectors
-3-
2 A final report shall accompany the CORPORATION's final bilhng and report no later
than January 10, 2001 Th~s report will summarize the benefits of the project,
financial summary of the project from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 Th~s
report wall be due upon completion of the project
SECTION VII
Length of Contract
Thru Agreement shall be valid from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 and may
be terminated by e~ther party upon thirty-(30) days written not,ce All costs associated unth
completed tasks shall be b~lled to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation of all
documantatmn reqmred under Sectmn VI
SECTION VIII
Assignments
The CORPORATION shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the
CORPORATION shall not transfer or assign any funds or clmms due or to become due hereunder
w~thout the prior written approval of the Village Manager. Any transfer or assignment of funds
pursuant to tins agreement, e~ther in whole or ~n part, or any ~nterest there~n shall be due to the
CORPORATION shall be deemed of no force or effect and shall not be hndmg upon the VILLAGE
-4-
.SECTION IX.
Notices and Communications
Not~ccs and conunumcatmns under tlus Agreement shall be sent registered or certffied mml postage
prepared, to the respective part~es as follows
to the VILLAGE
Mr Wdham J Cooney, Jr
D~rector of Commumty Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, llhnms 60056
to the CORPORATION
Mr Lyle Q Foster
Director
CEDA Northwest Self-HMp Center, Inc
1300 W. Northwest Highway
Mount Prospect, Ilhnois 60004
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ATTEST. BY
Premdent of the Village Board
CEDA NORTHWEST SELF-HELP
Village Clerk CENTER, INC.
ATTEST
BY
D~rector
Notary Public
-5-
EMPLOYMENT RESOURCE CENTER
CEDA Northwest will be opening an employment resource center at its
admimstrative office at 1300 W. Northwest Highway, Mt. Prospect, IL The
ground brealang vall occur around June I wath a scheduled opemng set for
September 1. This essential service vall be an important addition to the 30+
programs offered at the agency.
CEDA Northwest projects serving 750 low income individuals (includes 50 ~
TANF paxtie~pants) m its first year of operation Partm~pants v~ll take advantage
of the use of three computers (vail include access to the lnternet) and printers,
desks, telephones, copy machine, fax machine, camcorder, TV/VCR, dry erase
board and a resource library
CEDA North'ivest vall have two professional employment counselors on slte to
provide techmcal assistance and traimng for the participants CEDA Northwest
will also recrmt volunteers from the commumty to provide free consultatmn and
tutoring for the residents The center vall particularly target hard to employ ~
residents along w~th ~ts current employment program participants
In add~tmn to the Village of Mt Prospect, CEDA Northwest has also received
financial assistance from the Grand Victoria Casino ($52,000) and the Village of
Arlington Heights ($25,000) CEDA Northwest is also recelwng funding from
the Department of Labor, Department of Housing and Urban Development and
the Department of Commeme and Community Affmrs to fund equipment and
staff The $15,000 from the Village of Mt Prospect will be used for bricks and
mortar to bmld tins new addition
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ ~..%1 (~)
DATE MARCH 16, 2000
SUBJECT. OPERATION GREEN LIGHT GRANT APPLICATION - RESOLUTION
The Community Development Department is pursuing approxtmately $400,000 in Operation Green L~ght grant
funds to pay for a port~on of eligible costs of the proposed train station site ~mprovements, (see attached s~te plan)
The Village was recently awarded two other grants, $133,000 from the Surface Transportation Program for Raft
Road Depot Improvements and $130,000 from Rep Sulhvan's Office, for trmn station s~te ~mprovements The
train station s~te ~mprovements include new landscaping, new benches, brick pavers, improwng the commuter
parking lot, exterior repairs to the bus shelter and reahgmng the train station entrance to Northwest H~ghway As
part of the apphcat~on process, the Village ~s reqmred to approve the attached resolution The resolution
authorizes the Village Manager to act on behalf of the Village to secure grant funds under IDOT's Operatton
Green L~ght program
Please forward this resolution to the Village Board for their consideration If approved, staff will forward a copy
of the resolutmn to IDOT and make the resolutmn part of the grant appheat~on For your eonvemenee, a copy of
the grant apphcatlon ~s attached
Wflham'J Cooney,/~ICP
\\VH~V02~DEPT~COMDEV~GEN~LNG\Greenh ght~MEJ memo re resolut~on.do¢
JC
W~L 3/14~00
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION
BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR OPERATION GREEN LIGHT FUNDS
FROM THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS, the prowmon and improvement of mass transportabon fac~hbes ~s essenbal to the .-~
development of a safe, efficient, funcbonal mass transportation system, and
WHEREAS, the IIhno~s Department of Transportat~on's authonty to make such Grants, makes
funds avadable to offset certain capital costs of providing and improwng mass transportabon
facd~bes, and
WHEREAS, grants for sa~d funds w~ll ~mpose certain obhgabons upon the recipient
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SECTION ONE That an apphcabon be made to the D~ws~on of Pubhc Transportabon,
Department of Transportation, State of Ilhno~s, for a financial assistance grant under the Ilhno~s
Department of Transportat~on's general authority to make such Grants, for the purpose of
off-setbng certain mass transportation faclhty capital costs of the V~llage of Mount Prospect
~E_C_T_LO_JJ._~Q The Vdlage Manager of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect Is hereby authorized
and d~rected to execute and file on behalf of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect such apphcat[on
~;~LQJ~L~J[~ The Vdlage Manager of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect ~s authorized to
furmsh such additional mformabon as may be required by the D~ws~on of Pubhc Transportation
tn connecbon w~th the aforesaid apphcabon for sa~d grant
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED th~s day of ,2000
Gerald L Farley, Mayor
ATTEST
Velrna W Lowe, Vdlage Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
To MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM' DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE' MARCH 8, 2000
SUBJECT INCREASE IN WATER AND SEWER RATES
PURPOSE:
To present for the Board's conmderatlon an ordtnance ~ncreaslng the Vtllage's water and sewer
rates
BACKGROUND:
Sxnee 1990 the V~llage has followed the practice of approving moderate annual increases xn
water and sewer rates, as opposed to ~mplementlng large ~ncreases penodtcally The 2000
Budget ~ncludes a 4% increase in water and sewer rates
DISCUSSION:
The 2000 Budget ~s showing revenues of $7,599,200 and expenses of $7,998,218, resulting ~n
a projected operating defic~t of $399,018 The projected revenue figure Includes the planned
4% increase in rates If rates are not xncreased, the deficit would increase to almost $630,000.
The $399,018 shortfall of revenues over dtsbursements should not cause too much concern.
F~rst of all, expendxtures have generally come m under budget by a few percent, resultlng ~n a
savings of between $100,000 and $150,000 Secondly, the 2000 Budget includes almost
$1,155,000 of capital expenditures, whmh ~s an increase of $313,000 over 1999 W~th a cash
balance of $2.7 milhon, the Water and Sewer Fund can afford to draw down cash by $400,000
for capital improvements Attached hereto ~s a financml summary of the Water and Sewer
Fund for the years 1998 through 2001 ~
The followtng table dlustrates the recommended rates as reflected ~n the proposed ordinance
Whale we generally tried to achieve a 4% increase, rounding down to the nearest cent resulted
in a slightly lower increase
Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent
Inside Village Per 1,000 Gallons Per 1,000 Gallons Change
Water $3 23 $3 35 3 72%
Sewer $0 34 $0 35 2 94%
Combined $3 57 $3 70 3 64%
Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent
Outside Village Per 1,000 Gallons Per 1,000 Gallons Change
Water $6 46 $6 71 3 87%
Sewer $0 34 $0 35 2.94%
Combined $6 80 $7 06 3 82%
For Village sewer users not connected to the Vdlage's water system, the monthly charge per
dwelling unit would be $2 90, an Increase of 3 94% over the current rates
If a Mount Prospect household uses 16,000 gallons of water over a two-month pertod, their
b~monthly water and sewer usage fee would be $59 20, an Increase of $2 08
No ~ncrease ~s being proposed for the monthly availabd~ty charge assessed customers outside
of Special Service Area No 5. For most customers, those w~th a 5/8" water line, the charge
will remmn at $10
For purposes of comparison, the Village enacted water and sewer rate increases of 4 2%, 3 5%,
4 0% and 4 0% respectively in the years 1996 through 1999
Upon adoption of the ordinance, we will place a notice of the pending Increase on all water
balls ~ssued between April 6th and June 1st The rates would take effect for those bills rendered
after June 1, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It ~s recommended the Village Board approve the attached ordinance ~ncrcas~ng water and
sewer rates effective for bills rendered after June 1, 2000
DOUGLAS R ELLSWORTH, CPA
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WATER AND SEWER FUND
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
1998 1999 2000 2001
Audited Estimate Budget Forecast
Operabng Revenues
B~lhngs 5,301,502 5,545,230 5,766,900 5,997,556
Other 145,680 95,000 103,000 103,000
Total Operating Revenues 5,447,182 5,640,230 5,869,900 6,100,556
Operabng Expenses
Administration 1,056,904 1,157,605 1,179,503 1,171,084
Ma~ ntenance 147,069 162,975 163,461 170,461
Water Supply and D~stnbubon 696,519 999,499 939,684 861,599
Water Valves and Hydrants 271,471 286,685 294,907 306,456
Water Meter Maintenance 231,045 275,147 278,926 289,843
Equipment Maintenance 574,805 597,275 512,842 519,802
Samtary Sewer Maintenance 291,684 343,934 344,395 359,044
Lake Mich~gan Water 2,788,490 2,982,970 2,993,980 3,054,500
Total Operating Expenses 6,057,987 6,806,090 6,707,698 6,732,789
Operating Income (610,805) (1,165,860) (837,798) (632,233)
Non-operabng Revenues/Expenses
SSA Taxes 1,530,655 1,545,300 1,545,300 1,545,300
Investment Income 167,800 195,000 175,000 175,000
D~sposal of F~xed Assets 9,725 -
Debt Service (314,064) (143,045) (135,395) (128,963)
Capital Expenditures (510,200) (841,300) (1,155,125) (778,800)
Other 9,000 9,000 9,000
Total Non-operabng Revenues/
Expenses 883,916 764,955 438,780 821,537
Net Cash Flow 273,111 (400,905) (399,018) 189,304
I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE V ENTITLED "METERS AND RATES"
OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILI.AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE That paragraphs A and B of Scion 22~504 2 entitled "Water Rates" of Article V enUtled "Meters
and Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its enlarety; so that
hereinafter said Section 22 500 2 A and Seelaon 22 504.2.B shall be and read as follows.
N Sec. 22.504.2 Water Rates
A All Village users witlun the Village, having a chreet or mahrect conneelaon wath Vtllage water mains or
pipes shall pay the following rate
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or pomon thereof $3.35
B All Village users outside the corporate hmlts of the Village having a (hrect or lnahrect connection w~th
Village water mains or pipes shah pay the following rate
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or poraon thereof $6 71 N
SECTION TWO That paragraph C of Section 22.500 3 enUfled "Sewer Rates" of Amcle V entitled "Meters and
Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Vdlage Code, as amended, is hereby fuaher amended in its en~ety, so that hereinafter
said Set,on 22.500 3 C shall be and read as follows
~ C. Rate:
1. All Village sewer users wittun the corporate limits of the Village having a chreet or inchreet
connection wath the Village sewer and water maws or pipes shall pay the following sewer rate,
based upon the amount of water consumed to wtueh sewer service is furnished
Per 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $0 35
2 All Village sewer users wathln the corporate hnnts of the Village having a chreet or mdtreet
conn~tlon wath the V'fllage sewer mains or plpea aM not wath lhe Vdlage water mares or pipes shall
pay a fiat rate of
Per month per dwelling umt $2 90
3 Ail sewer users outade the corporate lunits of the Vdlage havang a chreet or mchrect connect:on vnth
the Village sewer and water mains or pipes, shall pay the follovnng sewer rate based upon the
amount of water consumed to which sewer service is furnished
Per 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or port, on thereof $0 35
4 Ail sewer users ou~de the corporate Imuts of the Village having a chreet or reda:eot connection wath
the Village sewer mares or pipes, but not wath Vdlage water mares or pipes, shall pay a fiat rate of
Per month per dwelling unit $2 90"
SECTION THREE That the fees set forth in this Orthnanee shall be apphed to all water and sewer bills rendered
after June 1, 2000
SECTION FOUR That flus Orthnanee shall be in full force and effect from and after ~ts passage, approval and
pubhcatton m pamphlet form m the manner prowded by law.
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED flus __ day of ,2000
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST.
Velma W. Lowe, %llage Clerk
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E JANONIS
FROM SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & BUILDINGS
DATE MARCH 15, 2000 ,
SUBJECT SEALED BID RESULTS FOR THE 2000 CATCH BASIN AND INLET
CLEANING PROGRAM
BACKGROUND
Annually a contract is let to clean, respect and update our mventory for one sixth of the village's
storm catch basins and inlets This annual program mnnnnzes possible clogged storm sewer
structures, as well as updatmg out inventory and condition rating of all our structures on a six-
year rotation
BID RESULTS
Sealed bids were opened at 10 00 A M on March 7, 2000 for proposed catch basm and street
mlet cleanmg This year the areas being serviced are, from Lmneman Road/Church Road east to
Route 83 between Golf Road and Dempster, Seminole Lane south to Euclid Avenue between
Wolf Road and l~ver Road, and Euchd Avenue south to Kensington Road between Burning
Bush Lane and R~ver Road Ten mmtatlonal bids were mailed', and a bid notice was placed m the
local papers
Six bids were received, and bid results are as follows
Bidder Bid Price
Elgin Sweeping Services, Inc. $ 21,250 00
Midwest Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc 21,500 00
A-K Underground, Inc 22,237 50
Heritage Environmental Services, LLC 25,000 00
National Power Roddmg Corporation 40,250 00
Kenny Industrial Services, LLC 59,000 O0
\USERS~PBURES\WORD~STREETxBSINLCL2000REC DOC 1
Page two
Catch Basm & Inlet Cleamng Program B~d Results
March 15, 2000
DISCUSSION
The low b~dder Elgin Sweeping Serwces, Inc has not worked for us m the past ,but they supphed
four references, all of whmh smd they have done excellent work and they would h~re again
Quantities w~ll be adjusted so the total expenditure w~ll not exceed the budgeted amount Funds
for this proposed contract are ~n the current budget, on page 251, account code 6105509~540779,
~n the amount of $30,000 00 and on page 212, account code 0015108-540520, m the amount of
$5,200
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend acceptance of the lowest b~d as subuntted by Elgin Sweeping Services, Inc for a
catch basm and mlet cleanmg contract for an amount not to exceed $35,200 00
Paul Bures
Supenntendent of Streets & Buildings
I concur
D~rector of Pubhc Works
PB/pb
c D~rector of Public Works Glen R Andler
Deputy D~rector of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey
file
X \USERS~PBURES\WORD~STREEIAB SINLC/1000REC DOC 2
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO V1LLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E JANONIS
FROM SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & BUILDINGS
DATE MARCH 14, 2000
SUBJECT SEALED BID RESULTS CATCH BASIN & INLET REPAIRS
BACKGROUND
Th~s bid 1s for our annual contract for "catch basin and inlet repmr" Many of our older structures
are made of brick and, w~th t~me, the mortar or brick deteriorate, requtnng patching,
reconstructing or total replacement The repmrs are usually made w~th concrete adjustment nngs
or precast cones to ehmmate future deterioration of the mortar jmnts Th~s work ~s usually done
~n late July/August to make sure all structures are in good repmr for the fall rainy season and to
mtmmtze any possible wrater fmlures
BID RESULTS
Sealed b~ds were opened at 10 00 A M on March 7, 2000 for proposed catch basxn and street
inlet repmrs Bxd prices were based on estimated quant~txes of approximately 30-35 structures to
be etther adjusted, reconstructed or replaced as needed E~ght mwtatmnal b~ds were marled, and a
b~d not~¢e was placed xn local papers
Two h~ds were recmved, and b~d results are as follows
B~dder B~d Price
Archon Constructmn Co Inc $29,825 00
Glenbrook Excavating, Inc $42,300 00
Suburban General Constmctmn* $41,000 00
Artley Pawng & Contracting Corp ** No B~d
* Suburban General Constructlon's bid was received via telephone atter the bid opening, ~t is not ehg~ble for
consideration
** Artley Paving Is no longer m underground work and w~ll be removed from the bidders hst
X \USERS~BURES\WORD~STREET~BASNREP2000RES doc 1
Page two
Catch Basin & Inlet Repmrs B~d Results
March 14, 2000
DISCUSSION
The low b~dder Archon Construction Co Inc supphed five rbferences, all which smd he has done
excellent work and they would use h~m again Quantities will be adjusted so the total
expenditure will not exceed the budgeted amount Funds for th~s proposed contract are m the
current budget, on page 254, account code 615509-540777, m the amount of $30,000 00
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend acceptance of the lowest b~d as submitted by Archon Constructmn Co Inc for a
catch basin and ~nlet repmr contract for an amount not to exceed $30,000 00
Paul Bures
Supenntendent of Streets & Bmld~ngs
I concur
- Gle~-~R ~An~tler
Dxrector of Pubhc Works
PB/pb
c D~rector of Pubhc Works Glen R Andler
Deputy D~rector of Pubhc Works Sean P Dorsey
file
X \USERS~PBURES\WORD~STREET~BASNREP2000RES doc 2
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E JANONIS
FROM SOLID WASTE COORDINATOR
DATE MARCH 14, 2000
SUBJECT RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE CONTRACT
At the February 22, 2000 Committee of the Whole meebng the Mayor and Vdlage Board
recommended acceptance of ARC D[sposal's contract proposal for res~denbal sohd waste
services effecttve May 1, 2000 through December 31,2004 (A copy of the ~nformatton
presented at the February 22, meebng which h~ghhghted contractual services and associated
fees as well as the contractual fee schedule are attached )
The Public Works Department requests that the new Res~denbal Sohd Waste Collecbon and
D~sposal Contract between the Vdlage of Mount Prospect and ARC D~sposal be placed on the
agenda for formal acceptance at the March 22, Vdlage Board Meebng
I would also I~ke to ~nform you that the Sol~d Waste Commission wdl be rewew~ng the current
Sohd Waste Brochure at the March 16, Commission meebng Any rews~ons and/or addtt~ons
w~ll be included ~n the new brochure, which wdl be mailed to all s~ngle and mulbfamdy umts pnor
to May 1 Per the terms of the Contract, ARC is responsible for the pnntmg and postage costs
for th~s madmg
Thank you
M L~sa/~ngell t
cc Pubhc Works D~rector Glen R Andler
X \US ERS~LAN G E LL\WORD\WASTE~Contract2000s[gn mayor doc
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM "~.r~ crrY t~
TO VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E JANONIS
FROM SOLID WASTE COORDINATOR
DATE FEBRUARY 17, 2000
SUBJECT SOLID WASTE CONTRACT PROPOSAL/RECOMMENDATIONS
RESIDENTIAL SERVICES
COMMERCIAL SERVICES
BACKGROUND
In August of 1994 the V~llage of Mount Prospect entered into an exclusive residenbal sohd
waste contract w~th ARC D~sposal Company The five (5) year and n~ne (9) month contract
expire April 30. 2000
As you are aware, major changes in the sohd waste industry have s~gn~ficantly altered municipal
sohd waste programs Curbs~de recycling, automated collecbons, volume-based and user fee
systems have enhanced mumcipal collecbon systems and reduced the amount of res~denbal
waste going to landfills The V~llage's 34% d~vers~on rate ~s one of the h~ghest in th~s area, and
is attributed to ~ts modified volume-based approach to effecbve soI~d waste management
While ~t appears most municipal programs have stab~hzed, the sohd waste hauhng ~ndustry
remains fluid An industry that at one t~me offered a compebbve market of small ~ndependent
and major haulers has been drasbcally downs/zed through buy-outs and acquis~bons (The
V~llage's sol~d waste hauler, ARC D~sposal was purchased by Repubhc Services in the fall of
1998 ) Although not as chaobc, the effects of"over-buying and under-producing" conbnue to
plague the ~ndustry Competibve market cond~bons beneficial to mumcipal programs are no
longer the norm In many cases reorgan~zabon at local offices has ~mpacted the service quahty
of municipal programs
A recent survey of commumbes w~th new sol~d waste contracts md~cated that seven (7) out of
the nine (9) commumbes e~ther negobated or extended their ex~st~ng contract and two (2) went
out for bid Of the b~dd~ng communibes, one ended up with h~gher rates than were proposed
dudng negobations with their waste hauler, and the other community received three (3)
compebbve b~ds but due to poor performance d~d not accept the low b~d of their ex~st~ng
(Addibonal contract information is provided on Attachment D, SWANCC Municipal Collecbon
Rate survey )
At the April 14, 1999 Committee of the Whole Meeting Public Works staff were d~rected to
engage in negotiabons w~th the V~llage's soI~d waste hauler, ARC D~sposal Company for a new
res~denbal solid waste contract.
DISCUSSION/NEGOTIATIONS
As you may recall, In August of 1991 the Vdlage s~multaneously entered ~nto ~ts first residential
sol~d waste contract w~th ARC D~sposal and adopted a modified volu_me-based sol~d waste
management system The comprehensive sol~d waste program provides residents an
opportumty to pracbce both economically and environmentally sound waste generabon and
disposal habits The success of the Vdlage's sohd waste program clearly hes w~th a un,ted
commumty effort to reduce the res~denbal waste stream and control sohd waste costs
Attachment A outhnes current res~denbal services
Prior to the April 14, 1999 COW Meebng the Sohd Waste Commission conducted a
comprehensive evaluation of the ex~sbng program including contract language The Sohd
Waste Commission believes the Vdlage's modified volume-based refuse collection program ~s
an effecbve approach for management of residential waste, and that ~t ~s well accepted ~n the
community. Therefore, the Commission's only recommendabon was to ~nclude an option for
subscnpbon service for the coIlecbon of containerized/bagged yard material
At th~s t~me staff is prepared to present the results of our on-going d~scuss~ons w~th ARC
D~sposal to prowde cost-effecbve and efficient services to the residents of Mount Prospect
under a new res~denbal solid waste contract A brief narrative of residential services w~th
proposed program add~bons and enhancements ~s h~ghl~ghted below
Curbside Sin_ale Family Refuse and Recycling Services
Basic Services (no changes)
· Modified Volume-Based Refuse Collecbon
· Unlimited Recychng
· Unlimited Collecbon of Bulk Items
· Three Cleanup Weeks peryear
· Unlimited Collection of Brush
· Christmas Tree Collection
· Curbs~de collecbon of loose leaves (d~sposal)
User Fee Programs (no changes)
· Yard Material Collection
· Excess Refuse
· Sticker (Refuse/Yard Material)
· Residential apphances
Proposed EnhancementslAdd~tions
· Corrugated cardboard· modifications of preparation requirements
Cardboard can be bundled or bagged next to the bzn.
· The size of acceptable corrugated will be zncreased to 3' x 3'; ARC is in the pr&cess
of purchasing new recychng trucks
· Scrap metal: drop-off for scrap metal at ARC facd~ty; 2'101 South Busse Road.
· Subscription Service for Yard Material Collection
Flat rate paid to ARC by user.
90-gallon toter
Once a week collection (April through November)
· Extended leaf program Is Included with the unhmlted brush collection fee
· Household Hazardous Waste Collection- Optional Service
ARC will subcontract for a one (1) day household hazardous waste drop-off program
each contract year. Fee based on contractual rates; approximately $50,000 per
event.
Multifamlly Refuse and Recycling Services
Centralized co[lecbon of resident~al waste
· Fee structure based on size/number of refuse containers and service frequency
Centrel~zed collecbon of recyclables
· All matenals collected m curbs~de collecbon
· Fee structure based on number of 90 - gallon toters and frequency of service
ARC Disposal's Pro~)osed Contractual Rates
A detailed overview of ARC's proposed rates for s~ngle family and mulbfam~ly refuse and
recychng services are provided on Attachments B and C Attachments B and C also compare
the proposed rates with the current fees for sol~d waste services
Results and Recommendations
Although proven to be a cost-effective sol~d waste management system the V~llage's modified
volume-based program remains fairly unique ~n the northwest suburbs The V~llage of Morton
Grove is the only SWANCC commumty w~th a s~milarly structured program
Morton Grove recently negotiated a five (5) year extension of their ex~st~ng solid waste contract
with Graot Waste Industries The table below prowdes a comparison of Groot's rates for s~ngle
family refuse and recycling services with the ARC proposed rates for Mount Prospect single
family refuse and recycling services It should be noted however, that wh~le the Morton Grove
program closely parallels the Mount Prospect program there are variances in services prowded
Residential Refuse and Recycling Cost Comparison (Combined Rate - Per umtJPer month)
Mount Prospect Morton Grove
(proposed rates)
S~ngle Family Basic Service
Refuse/Recycling
Year 1 $6 17 $8 31
Year 2 $6 42 $8 31
Year 3 $6 68 $8 46
Year4 $6 95 $8 61
Year 5 $7 23 $8 76
For further analysis PubI~c Works staff compared the proposed 4% Increase with the rate
increases over the term of the current contract, August 1, 1994 through Apnl 30, 2000
Single Family Mult~fam~ly
Year I (August 1994 o July 1995) 5% ~ncrease 7 5% ~ncrease
Year 2 (August 1995 - July 1996) 5% ~ncrease 7 5% increase
Year 3 (August 1996 - July 1997) 5% ~ncrease 7 5% ~ncrease
Year 4 (August 1997 - July 1998) 4 5% ~ncrease 4 5% increase
Year 5 (August 1998 - July 1999) 4 5% increase 4 5 ~ncrease
(August 1999 -April 30, 2000) No increase No increase
The ARC proposal holds all rate ~ncreases to 4% per year, over the term of a new five (5) year
contract, May 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004
F~naIly, staff reviewed records and d~scussed ARC's D~sposal service performance Whde staff
regards ARC's overall performance as highly satisfactory their commitment to resident
satisfaction is of great value In addition to the dady on-s~te contacts w~th an ARC route
supervisor, ARC customer service staff are accessible to both staff and residents ARC d~rect
service staff also assist w~th the Vdlage's commumty education program by "tagging"
unacceptable or ~mproperly prepared waste
Collectively, the criteria presented demonstrate the favorable pricing and performance prowded
by ARC Disposal Company Therefore, ~t ~s the recommendation of the Pubhc Works
Department that the Vdlage of Mount Prospect accept the ARC D~sposal proposal for residential
sol~d waste services
Commercial Solid Waste Services
At the April 14. 1999 Committee of the Whole meeting Public Works staff were d~rected to
request a proposal from ARC D~sposal Company for commercial sohd waste services for Mount
Prospect businesses
ARC D~sposal d~d submit a proposal for commercial sohd waste services along w~th a modified
proposal for commercial recychng However, as franchise agreements for commercial sol~d
waste services are primarily at the research stage, the Vdlage was again I~m~ted in its efforts to
conduct a comprehensive cost analysis of ARC's proposed rates
Whde staff did conduct a cost comparison of the rates from the newly implemented commercial
sol~d waste contract in the Vdlage of Skok~e th~s proved of little value as the Skok~e rates
~ncluded a blue bag recychng program which was not ~ncluded ~n ARC's rate proposal
As staff cannot provide, w~th confidence, any data that substantiates that the ARC proposal for
commercial sol~d waste services ~nclud~ng recycling, IS economically beneficial to the business
community staff recommends reJection of the ARC bid As It is also staff's recommendation
that the commercial sohd waste b~d proposal be let for competitive b~dd~ng, and as a
professional courtesy to ARC D~sposal, staff request that ARC's proposal remain closed
Refuse/Yard Mater~al St~cker Cost Analys~s
Included with the ARC proposal ,s a 4% ~ncrease per year for user fee services If approved
the st~cker fee for excess refuse and yard material would climb from $1 39 to $1.45 dunng the
first year As any increase may ~mpact the selt~ng price of the V~llage-~mpr~nted st~cker an
analys~s of the currentJprojected costs versus the selhng pnce was prepared A summary of the
analys~s ~s provided ~n the attached memo, Refuse/Yard Material, for ~nformabonal purposes
only Staff recognizes th~s may be a subject more appropriate for dtscuss~on during the 2001
budget process but felt th~s was a bmely opportunity to prowde an update
M Lisa Angell
D~rector of Public Works
cc Finance D~rector Doug EIIsworth
C '~vly Documents\sol~dwstcontract2000mgrmemo doc
Attachment A
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT CURRENT RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE SERVICES
Residential Units Waste Landfilled (tons)
1999
S~ngle Famdy Curbs~de Collection 13,540 12,562
Mult~fam~ly Centrahzed Collection [I.220 7.664
Total 21,760 20,226
Exclusive Contract August 1, 1994 - April 30, 2000
Contractor ARC D~sposal Company
· Basic Service Level (Once a week curbslde collection paid through property taxes)
2 -32 gallon refuse containers or bags
Unhm~ted collection of recyclables
Unhm~ted collection of brush
Unhm~ted collection of bulk items
Three (3) clean-up weeks per year
Christmas tree collection
Curbs~de collection of loose leaves, Village crews - October/November
Extended leaf collection (bagged), ARC D~sposal - November/December
· User Fee System (Prepaid Vl[lage-lmpnnted st~cker)
Refuse in excess of two (2) containers, $1 75 sticker per additional unit of
refuse
· Recychng Program
Over one (1) mdhon pounds of material are collected monthly
Materials collected include newspaper, mixed paper, ferrous metals, aluminum, glass, plastics (#'s
1,2,3,5,6 &7), chlpboard and corrugated cardboard
Residents with curbside pickup are provided 2 -18 gallon recychng btns at no cost
Mult~fam~ly properttes utilize 90-gallon toters at centrahzed Iocahons
Recycling servtces are also provided at no cost to schools, churches, non-profit agencies and the
Park D~stnct
· Yard Matenal Collection
Containerized yard material and bundled brush are collected from Apnl 1 through December 15 on
restdents designated collection day The matenal is collected separately from the refuse truck and
transported to a compost facility
Collection of contatnenzed yard material rigid container or biodegradable bag is a use fee system,
$1 75 per sticker
Properly prepared brush bundles are collected in unlimited quantities at no additional cost
The leaves from the loose leaf collection program conducted by Pubhc Works staff
are transported and d~sposed of at a compost s~te by ARC D~sposal The cost for
th~s serwce is included in the per unit basic service fee
The extended leaf collection program ~s conducted by ARC Disposal At the
end of the loose leaf collection residents can set out an unhm~ted number of
bagged leaves at no cost The Vdlage pays ARC D~sposal the contractual rate of
a $1 39 per bag for this service In 1998 15,439 leaf bags were collected for a total
cost of $21,460 21, In 1999 the Village negotiated a fiat rate of $15,000 00 for the
unhmlted collection and disposal of bagged leaves
In 1999 over 9,000 tons of yard material were composted through the Village's yard
material programs
Attachment B
SOLID WASTE BID PROPOSAL
ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY
MAY 1, 2000 - December 31, 2004'
Current Fees Proposed Fees (Year 1) Proposed Fees (Years 2 -5)
per unit/per month per umt/per month
S~ngle Family Basic Serwce $3 70 $3 85 4% increase each year
CoIlect~on/'Transportat~on
2-32 cans/bags refuse
Unhmlted bulk items
3 Cleanup weeks
Unlimited brush collection
Recycling $2 23 $2 32 4% Increase each year
Unlimited collection
Scrap metal drop-off
Brush Collection $0 69 $0 76 4% increase each year
Extended Leaf Collection
User Fee Programs (St~ckers)
Excess refuse $1 39 $1 45 4% increase each year
Yard Material Collection
(Cdiect/Trans ID[sposal $1 39 $1 45 4% ~ncrease each year
Yard Material (Subscription) not available $180 00 4% increase each year
Toter rental/coliecbon
April * November
Res=dentrol Applmnces $16 45 SWANCC FEE SWANCC FEE
$25 per appliance gate rate
Back door service $20 00 $20 80 4% Increase each year
Payment D~scount 1% 1% 1%
Mult~family Basic Service Container fees 4% Increase 4% increase each year
Coltecbon/Transportabon
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Optional
Estimated contractual fee $50,000 4% increase each year
Year I May 1, 2000 - December 31,2000
Year 2 January 1,2001 - December 31, 2001
Year 3 January 1, 2002 - December 31, 2002
Year 4 January 1,2003 - December 31, 2003
Year 5 January 1, 2004 - December 31. 2004
Attachment C
Current ARC Fees
~ equency of Servtce
Container Size l,.& eek 2xAt eel 3x/u eek 4xA~ eek ' ' ,
Jcublc.yard S 6.64 t [, 13.28 $ 19.92 I , 26.55 I, 33.20
]'Scubicyard$9.961[$19.92[$29.88 $39.84 [S 49.80
2cubicyards $ 13.28 IIS 26.55 $39.84 IlS 53.12 IS 66.40
4¢ub;cy~rds $ 26.58 t s 53.16 ls 79.72 $ 106.32 S 132.90
,cub~cy~rass 53.16 IS~06.32 Is 159.48 s 2~2.64 s 265.80
Recyclxng Toters $6.00 per month
Recyclxng Bins $2.32 per month
ARC's Proposed Rates
2000 - 4% Increase
Frequency of Service
Contalner Stze IxA~eek 2x&eek 3x/~eek 4xA~eek 5~A~ee~:
lcublcyard $ 6.91 S 13.81 [S 20.72 $ 27.61 S 34.53
1.S cubic yard S 10.36 15 20.72 IS 31.08 S 41.43 $ 51.79
2cubic3,ards $ 13.81 15 27.61 [$ 41.43 $ 55.24 $ 69.06_
4 cubic yards $ 27.64 [$ 55.29 [S 82.91 $ 110.57 $ 138.22~
6cubic yards $41.45[$82.9015124.3615165.82 $ 207.26~
8 cubic yards $ 55.29 [$ 110.57 $ 165.86 [ S 221.15 S 276.43~
Recycling Toters $6.24 per month
Recycling Bins $2.'32 per month
Oct.2l. 1999 11:53AU SET ENVIRONMENTAL No,4697 P. 2/4
" - -- - SET Environmental, Inc.
_ 450 Surasc Road
ma -- ~ Whc~hng Ilhno~s
Tel (847) 537-9221 ' Fax (847) 537-9265
,September 17, 1999 C910o34
Mr. Dick Hovmg
ARC Disposal & Recycling, Inc.
2101 S Bussc Road
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
RE Hazardous Waste Collection (Mt Prospect)
Dear Mr Hovmg:
SET Envwonmental, Inc is pleased to provide the following gross estunate for a potentml One Day
Household Hazardous Waste Collection The projections noted below arc based on spcculauon of 5% and
10% participation of the households in the corresponding region you descmbed via telephone A firmer
estimate for a Collection Project can be developed as your event draws closer to implementation
packaging of the chemicals will be provided by experienced lab pack speclahst.s who have met or exceeded
the training reqtureraents of OSHA (1910 120 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response)
All lab pack drams will b~ packaged, labeled and marked in accordance with US ]EPA and DOT
regulations and ctisposal site guidehnes In addition, required manifests and restriction notffica~aons will
be completed requiring only a signature from an authorized agent of the generator
Pricing ProjccUons:
Households 14,600
Sugeested Participation 5 % 10 %
- #households /gnouseholds
730 1,460
Price Grid ~art~c)_oat~on
Unk Price 5 % 10 %
Off Based Paints $ 90.00/55 gal. $ 1,350 00 $ 2,700.00
Latex Paints $ 95.00155 gal $ 4,560.00 $ 9,120 00
Flammables $ 95.00155 gal $ 2,375.00 $ 4,750.00
Corrosives $ 215.00/55 gal $ 1,720 00 $ 3,440.00
Organic Polsons/Pe~tic~des $ 215.00/55 gal $ 4,300.00 $ 8,600 00
Oats $ 95.00/55 gal. $ 2,375 00 $ 4,750 00
Oxkhzers $ 350.00/55 gal. $ 750 00 $ 2,100.00
Aerosols $ 180.00/55 gal $ 1,980 00 $ 3,960.00
Other ~ 4.000,00 $ 8.000.00
$ 23.410,00 $ 47,420 00
Oct 2{ 1999 II 53AM SET ENVIRONMENTAL F{o 4697 P 3/4
SET Envlro~me~tal, Inc.
ARC Disposal & Recycling, ~¢ cmoo~
Page 2 of 3
Labor ~ 12 hour clay
8 person team $ 5,500.00 Additional 4 person tcara ' $ 2,160 00
Su~lus/Materials $ 4,800.00 $ 2,500 00
Site Preparadon/
~ $ 2,5OO O0 ~ S 2.500.00
$ 36,210 O0 $ 60,0//0 00
#,~ -~.77a'
Condltzo~s of Proposal on page 2
SET Environmental and Trcah'nent One arc fully insured and hcenscd by the US EPA and DOT for
transportatzon, t~catment, storage and dtsposal of hazardous waste. Certificates of Insurance andpcrmit
status ate available upon request
We appreciate the opportunity tn work with you, al~d look forward to your response If you have any
quesuonS, please feel/tee to call me at (84'/) 537-9221
To schedule service, please sign Customer Acceptance secUon and return to SET
Smcercly,
Frances Dellutri
Techmeal Sales Represanmt~ve
FD/js
Cond~tiorts of Proposal
1 TI~ proposal is vahd for sixty (60) days from the date of' tl~s proposal.
2 Payment Is due thtrty (30) days from the date of mvomo SubJeCt m cte&t approval
3 If any Items, including trade names and l:nknowns, arc found to be pathological, biological,
rachoacQve, PCB. or choxm suspect, they are not tncluded In th.is cstzmate
4 'Trade mine" materzals requu'e more information (complete chemical n~me) for proper packaging
a~d d~sposal If thls lrfformat2on cannot be obtained, these items will be treated as unknowns and
require addlhonal analysis. These costs are not included in the original est~nate
Oct.21 1999 ll'53AU SET ENVIRONUENTAL No.4697 P 4/4
SET Enwronment~l, Inc.
ARC Disposal & Recycling, Inc. ;
Page 3 of 3
5. SET technicians will determine on site if material is safe to be stabihzed or transported
Dangerous materials such as explosives and peroxide formers will be accepted at technmmn
~screfion at the tJme of packaging. If gtabtl~zat~on ~s necessary, adthtlonal charges may be
incurr~
6 Disposal of trade name and unknown items arc included m this proposal provded they are not
identified as reacttve or explosive compounds Disposal of reactave or explosive compounds
be priced on a per situatmn bas~s
D~sposal of any additional items or quanuties not hsted on the original inventory rcccivcd arc not
included and may recur adcht~onal costs
8 Tlus proposal assumes chemical waste dcslgnated for d~sposal ~s segregated from other materials
and easily accessible to the technicmns
9 Th~s proposal assumes that cbemmal component mformaUon will be obtainable on product labels
or Material Safety Data Sheets Should insufficient information be avatlable, ~tems may be
constdcrcd unknown Pricing wtll be quoted at that time
10 Treatment, storage and d~sposal facihty to be utthzed Is
Treatment One
D~wslon of SET Em,~ronmental, Inc
Houston. Texas
US EPA ID# TXD 055135388
*Your signature below inchcates )our acceptance of thc pricing, terms and condttions set I~orth in thts
proposal.
CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE
ARC Dts£osal & Recycling, Inc.
('Name/T~tle) (Date)
(Authorized Signature) .... OP.O ~
Glen R Andler ~ Rodenck T O'Donovan
Deput~ [~rector S~'eets/Bu~ld~ngs Supenn~endent
Sean P D0rsey Paul C Bures
Jeffrey A Wulbecker Sandra M Clark
M Lisa A~9ell James E Guenther
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1700 W (~sntrsl Road, Mount Prospect, Ilhno~s 60056-2229
Phone 847/870-5840 Fax 847/853-8377 TDD 847/392-1235
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
and
ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY
RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL CONTRACT
MAY 1, 2000 through DECEMBER 31, 2004
Recycled Paper - Pnnted wSh Soy Ink
FEE $CHEDIII.E
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOS-kL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
The following fee schedule ,s dlv,ded into s,x (6) parts Refuse Basic Sen xce,'Mod~fied Volume Based
Alternate #1, Yard Materials, Option #1, Recyclable$, Specml Collecnons and Combined Sticker Fee
Any alternative or opUona[ fee may be enacted at the sole d,screnon of the Village at the startup of the
new contract or anytime during the contract period
Part I -REFUSE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
Contract Year
Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
A Basic Service/Modified Volume Based
1. Single Family Monthly fee for weekly
curbsidecolleetionmclu&ngbulkltems, ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~
bagged leaves dunng extend leaf p,ck'up,
and 3 clean up weeks per year
SWANNC Waste, no tlpp,ng fee
(Once a week service) Increase each consecutive year.
2 Unit Cost for each container, bag,
bundle or bulk item not covered by
#l Umtcostlsforcollectlonand ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
transportation SWANNC Waste,
No tipping fee Included
3 % D,scount allowed Village for payment
made by 20th day of follow,ng month-
40ptmna[ Direct Billing Fee-amount to be
added to the unit costs for single-family
onee aweekservlceabovelfcontraetor ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~
bills res,dents or owner direct
B Special Services
1 Wh,teGoods Collection Fee-Cost per SWANCC GATE FEE
item including collection, processing and
disposal. Charges to be billed al,feet to ~ ~ ~ [-------] ~
resident
Increase each consecutive year.
2 Back Door Ser-.,,ce-Monthly addlnonal
surcharge for providing rear door refuse,
recychng&yardmatenalserv,ce, charge ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~
to be billed d~rect to resldent
Part II - YARD MATERIAL COLLECTION .A\D DISPOS4L
Increase each consecutive year.
Contract Year
A Yard Mater, al Collect,on.rD'sposal Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year $
Curbs,de Fee per Bag or Container.
(Vdlageadmm,stersstlckersales ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Note Added to th,s pr,ce ,,;ould be the Village Admm~stranon fee and retailer commission as set by the
Village to estabhsh the final per sncker selhng price to the resident
B SubscnptionServlce Increase each consecutive year.
Smgle-Famdy annual Fee for Curbslde
Co,,ect~or~,spo,alSe.ice 7i~ [wrD ~ I-w-1 ~
C Brash Collect,on
Unhmtted collect,on and d~sposal of
brash bundles 12 month bflhng permd
(Extended leaf collect,on - bagged
leaves )
Part III - RECYCLABLE bIATERIAL COLLECTION
Contract Year
A S,ngle Family Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S
I. Stngle-Famdy-Onceaweekbas,cservtce Increase each consecutive year.
fee per umt per month Does not include
revenue spht,contractor keeps alt revenues
20ptmnal-Addzt~onalRecyclables If added
to baste service hst ofttems, amount to be
added to fee m #1 and #2 above or
increase ind,cate "No Charge". If not
avadable indtcate "N/A"
Fluorescent Bulbs and Ballasts ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Scrap Metal
B Multffamfly
Increase each consecutive year.
1 Multffamdy Monthly foe per 90 gallon
toter, Does not include recychng revenue
spht-Contractor keeps all revenues ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Part IV-SPECIALCOLLECTIONRATES Increase each consecutive year.
Cor~traet Year
A Rate for stems properly prepared for Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
packer p,ckup, collectmn and transport-
at,on. T ee0>eub,cyard=mmum
Village Receives 3.25 .25% .25% .25% .25%
B Rate for removal wlth loading eqmpment
required Ten (10) eublc yard mmlmum ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Part V -COMBINED REFUSE/YARD MATERIAL STICKER FEE
Alternate #2 - As an altemauve to separate sttckers for the collect:on of refuse and yard material
the Contractor shall submtta single st,cker fee to cover the cost for the collect,on and transports,mn of
refuse reqmrmg the prepa,d sticker or the cost for the collect,on, transportat,on and d,sposal of yard
material requiring a prepa,d sticker The single stroker shall read refuse/yard materml st,cker and may be
affixed to e,ther one umt of refuse or one umt o containerized ~,ard materml for collection, transportation,
and d,sposal (The Village x~ fll add a refuse t,pplng fee, admlmstratlve and comm~ssmn fee whmh ~ fll
then determine the st,cker selhng pr,ce
Zncrease each consecutive year.
Contract Year
Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Umt cost for each refuse container, one (1)
bag, bundle or bulk stem not covered by the
monthly fee in Part I, Al , or each bag ~ ~'~ ~'~ ~ ~
or eonta,ner of yard material
Refuse classified as SWANCC waste,
therefore the cost does not include t~p fee
Yard material as not classified as S~VANCC
waste, therefore the cost does ~nclude
d~sposal fee
Part VI - HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL (OPTIONAL)
~ Contract Year
Umt cost per single family residential un,t Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
one (Ix) per year drop-off for household
hazardousmatenal (Monthly fee to be ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
added to single family monthIy fee, Basic
Services and Alternate #I Fee
per attached proposal
Oct.2l 1999 il:53AM SET ENVIRONMENTAL ~1o.4697 P 2/4
-- ' SET Environmental, Inc.
~ ~'~ ~ -- ! 450 Surr,~ Road
tm.l__ -- ~ - Wh~hn~ Hhno~s 60090~382
Tel (847,1537-922! ' Fax (847) $37-926)
Sep~mber 17, 1999 c91oo34
M~ Dxck Hovmg
ARC D;~sposal & Kecyclmg. Inc
2101 $ Busse Road
Mt Pro~:,ect, IL
~ H~ardous W~ Collation ~t Prospect)
D~ar Mr Hovmg:
SET Env~omcn~, kc. is plowed to provide ~e fo~ow~g gross e~te for a po~nual One Day
Hous~old H~dous W~te CoUecuon ~e proj~o~ hoed ~low arc b~d on ~cuhuon of 55 and
I0~ pat~c~padon of ~e househol~ m ~e conespon~g region you described v~a telephone A firmer
esumate for a Collec~on Project c~ be d~velop~d ~ your event draws clout to
P~gmg of ~c chc~c~s w~ ~ prodded by e~cden~d lab pack ~c~al=~ who have ~t or exceed~
a~ Uam~ :eq~cmcn~ of OSHA (1910.120 H=~do~ W~ O~ra~om and ~mergency
All lab pack drams w~ ~ packaged, labeled and marked in accor~ncc wl~ US ~PA and DOT
mgula~o~ ~d ~osal site guidehnes h addition, required mmffcsa and rcs~ictlon not~caaons ~1
be completed requlr~g o~y a si~amrc from an suborned agent of ac generator
Pnc~g Projccuons:
Households 14,6~
Suggested Part~c~pation ~ ~ 10~
gho~ehol~ ~ouseholds '
~30 1,460
Pncc Grid ~icipat~on
U~t ~ic¢ 5~ 10~
Oil B~d Pa~ $ 90.~/55 g~ $ 1,350 ~ $ 2,7~.~
h~xPa~ $ 95.~/55g~ $ 4,560.00 $ 9.120~
~bles $ 95,~/55 g~. $ 2.375.~ $ 4,750.~
Co~osiv:s $ 215 00/55 g~. $ 1,720 ~ $ 3.~0.~
Org~ic Polsons~esgcides $ 215,00/55 g~. $ 4,3~.~ $ 8,6~
Oils $ 95 ~/55 gal. $ 2,375 ~ $ 4,750
Oxi~crs $ 350,00/55 gal ' $ 750 ~ $ 2,1~ 00
Aewsols $ 180.~/55 gal. $ 1,980 ~ $ 3,960 00
Oa~r 5 4.~ ~ $ 8.~.00
$ 23.410.~ $ 47,420.00
0¢t.21 1999 II 53AM SET ENVIRONMENTAL No 4697 P. 3/4
SET Envkomncat~d, Inc.
ARC Disposal & Recycling, Inc. cmoo34
Page 2 of 3
Labor - 12 hour day
8 persou team $ 5,500.00 ' Addtfional 4 person team $ 2,160 00
5um. lus/Materials $ 4,800 00 $ 2,500 00
Site Preparation/
Management $ 2,500.00 $ 2~500.00 $ 2.500.00
$ 36,210 00 $ 60,080 00
Conditions of Proposal on page 2
SET Environmental and Treatment One are fully insured and hcer~ed by the US EPA a~d DOT for
transportation, treatment, storage and dtsposal of hazardous waste Cerhficates of Imurancc and permit
status am available upon request
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you, and look fonvard to your response. If you have any
quesuons, please feel free to call me at (847) 537-9221
To schedule service, please mgn Customer Acceptance sectton and return to SET
Sincerely,
Frances Dellum
Techmcal Sales Representative
FO/js
Conditions of Proposal
1 This proposal is valid for sixty (60) days from the date of tins proposal
2 Payment Is due thirty (30) days from the date of invoice. Subject ~ credit approval
If any items, including trade names and ~nknoW~s, are found to be pathological, biological,
radloactzve, PCB, or choxln suspect, they arc not included lQ this cremate
4. "Trade'name" materials requn'e more mformabon (coraplcte chcrmcal name) for proper paclmgmg
and thsposal If this lz~formaUon cannot be obtained, these ~tem.q will be treated as unknowns and
requure add,bona/analysis. These costs arc not included in the omgmal estmaate.
Oct 21 1999 11:53A~{ SET ENVIRONMENTAL Ne.4697 P 4/4
SET Environmental, Inc.
ARC Disposal & Recycling, Inc c~oo~4
Page 3 o~ 3
5. SET t~chmcians w~ll determlne on site If material is safe to be stabdtzed or transported
Dangerous materials ~uch as explosives and peroxide formers will be accepted at techmcmn
d~screUon at the nme of packaging. If stabilization is necessary, additional charges may be
incurred
6 Disposal of trade name and unknown items are included m thts proposal provided they arc not
identtfied as reacuve or explosive compounds Disposal of reactive or explosive compounds will
be priced on a per slmatmn bas~s
7 D~sposal of any addmonal items or quanutms not listed on the original inventory recclvcd arc not
Included and may incur adchuonal costs
8. Tins prOposal assumes chemical waste designated for d~sposal is segregated from other materials
and easily accessible to the techmcisns
9. Tins proposal assumes that chemical component mformatmn will be obtainable on product labels
or Material Safety Data Sheets Should insufficmnt information be avadable, Items may be
considered unknown Pricing wall be quoted at that txrne.
I0 Treatxnent, storage and chsposal facihty to be utilized ~s:
Treatment One
D~vision of SET Environmental, Inc
Houston. Texas
US EPA ID# TXD 055135388
*Your signature below inchcates ) our acceptance of the prlcmg, terms and concl~tions set forth in this
proposal.
CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE'
ARC Du£osal & Recyehng, Inc.
(Name/Title) (Date)
(Authorized Signature) (P.O
PART VII - REFUSE COLLECTION AND TRANSPORTATION - Multlfam~ly
YEAR 1
Ft eqttency of Se~ice
Container St:e I~.4~ eek 2.x/v eel 3~A~ eek 4~ eek )x ~' ' ee;
Jc,b[cyard [S 6.91 [$ 13.81 20.72 27.61 34.53 ~
~.s~y~[s s Is s Iis
10.36 20.72 31.08 41.43 51.79
2cttb~cyards[S 13.sll [$ 27.61 ~$ 41.43 $55.24 IS 69.06
8cltbfcyard~ S 55.29 110.57 S 165.86 S 221.15 276.43
Recycling Toters - $6.24
Recycling B~ns - $2.32
YEARS 2, 3, 4 and 5
4% Increase effective January 1 of each contract year.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT
DATE MARCH 15, 2000
-- r--- /
SUBJECT: ACCEPT STATE OF ILLINOIS BID FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE NEW
ENGINEERING CAR
Back,qround
In the current budget, we are proposing to purchase one new pool car Th~s vehicle w~ll be used by the
Pubhc Works Eng~neenng D~ws~on staff to perform their da~ly dubes, which ~nclude on s~te evaluabons of
proposed eng~neenng projects, ~nspect[ons of V~llage projects, and transportation to meetings and
trammg
The need for th~s vehicle was ~dent~fled dunng the Year 2000 budget preparabon process The
Engmeenng D~ws~on is currently assigned five (5) pool vehicles 8 5 full-t~me employees share these
vehicles Dunng the summer, th~s ratio of employees to vehicles chmbs to over 2 1 when three (3) college
interns are added to the engmeenng staff to help ~nspect road and s~dewalk ~mprovement projects
Seasonal shortages aside, lack of transportation for engineers has become a s~gmficant problem on a
year-round bas~s dunng the past few years
Discussion
The proposed purchase cost w~ll be offset by the funds available m the Capital Equipment Replacement
Fund for the replacement of equipment #2759 Vermeer Trencher and #2760 Butler tra~ler These p~eces
of equipment were purchased in 1989 when Pubhc Works first took over the mstallabon and maintenance
of street hghbng They were purchased primarily to assist w~th the ~nstallabon of street hghbng and w~th a
secondary funchon to help with the repairs to water ma~n where the mains are located in rear yard
easements S~nce the purchase of these p~eces of equipment, the majority of the street hght installations
have been contracted out and the equipment has only been used spanngly m the past five years Both
2759 and 2760 are scheduled to be replaced in the year 2004 2759 has entered into ~ts eleventh year of
sen/ice and has logged only 94 hours W~th these few hours of runmng bme, It ~s my opinion th~s
equipment should not be replaced These two p~eces of equipment w~ll be sold at the NWMC aucbon in
October 2000, thus we will not be ~ncreaslng the fleet
The car we are proposing to purchase ~s a 2000 Ford Taurus flex fuel vehicle Th~s car is LEV (Low
Emission Vehicle) certified and can run on e~ther E-85 (85% ethanol 15% gasohne an alternabve fuel) or
on gasohne W~th the purchase of this car, the V~llage wdl be in comphance w~th the Clean A~r Act (llhno~s
Clean Fuel Fleet Program) for the year 2000 The Clean Air Act mandates that 50% of the vehicles
purchased th~s year weighing less than 8,500 pounds must be LEV certified by the Un,ted States
Enwronmental Protection Agency The current budget slates two (2) vehicles ~n th~s weight class for
replacement th~s year Th~s proposed Taurus procurement ~s one of these vehmles Its purchase would
fully satisfy our Clean Air Act fleet mandate obhgat[ons for 2000
Page2of2
Accept State of Ilhno~s B~d for the Purchase of One New Engmeenng Car
March 15, 2000
Th~s car also comphes w~th the Energy Pohcy Act (EPACT), which the V~llage must comply w~th ~n the
year 2002 EPACT mandates that 20% of the vehicles weighing less than 8,500 pounds purchased dunng
2002 must be powered by fuels other than gasohne S~nce the Taurus can run on E-85, an authonzed
altemabve fuel, the V~llage may also apply for credits that wdl allow this purchase to help sabsfy our 2002
EPACT obhgatlons
E-85 fuel ~s available at the Marathon gas stahon, located at Central Road and Northwest H~ghway The
cost of E-85 fuel is comparable to that of gasohne
The flexible nature of the Taurus fuel system ~s a s~gnlficant feature When th~s vehmle is ulbmately sold
at auction, it can be marketed as a gasoline fueled vehicle thereby protecbng ~ts resale value Staff
assumes that, at least for the short term, private vehicle purchasers wdl place greater value on gasohne-
fueled vehicles
We have also apphed to the IIhno~s Department of Commerce and Commumty Affairs (IDCCA) for an
$800 rebate for the purchase of an E-85 flexible fuel vehmle This rebate will reduce the net purchase
price to $14,749 00 The IDCCA ~s presenbng this program as an ~ncent~ve to use E-85 E-85 ~s
manufactured utlhz~ng Ilhnots-grown corn products
One of the requirements of the IDCCA rebate ~s that the vehicle actually runs on E-85 part of the time If
we recewe the rebate, we wdl be required to file annual reports w~th the IDCCA documenting our E-85
consumpbon The Vdlage has no other requirement to use alternatwe fuels unbl the EPACT takes effect
~n 2002 However, procurement of th~s Taurus wdl prowde us w~th an excellent opportunity to evaluate
the v~ab~hty of E-85 as an alternatwe fuel for the V~llage fleet prior to the onset of federal regulabon
Purchase Recommendahon
I recommend purchasing one new 2000 Ford Taurus four door sedan from the State of Ilhno~s contract
awarded to Landmark Ford, Spnngfleld, Ilhno~s at a cost not to exceed $15,549 00 Funds for th,s
proposed purchase are avadable ~n account 6707709-660124($18,000 00), page 288, of the current
budget
I concur
D~rector of Pubhc Works
X \FILES\FRONTOFF~EQUIP\NEWENGINEERINGCAR2000 doc
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS .~l~.~...~
FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER
DATE: MARCH 16, 2000
SUBJECT: CENTRAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
FINAL CHANGE ORDER AND AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT AGREEMENT
Backqround
The redevelopment of the 3-Corn s~te and Melas Park necessitated certain roadway
~mprovements including the w~denmg of the Central/Busse ~ntersectlon, mstallabon of a
new traffic s~gnal at the 3-Corn entrance drive, and the mstallabon of right and left turn
lanes into Melas Park. 3-Corn apphed for IDOT Development funding for the
mtersecbon and traffic s~gnal ~mprovements and received $736,,t00. 3-Corn agreed to
pay $130,000 towards the Busse Road leg of the mtersecbon ~mprovements. Funding
was also obtmned in the form of an IDNR grant for $500,000 for right and left turn
lanes into Melas Park, and other park improvements including bkepaths and roadway
and parking lot hghbng.
Discussion
Dunng the project design, IDOT rewsed the plans to ~nclude a ma]or change ~n the road
profile to improve pavement drainage. This resulted ~n an ~ncrease In the asphalt
material quanbbes and an increase ~n construcbon englneenng costs ~ncreasmg the
total project cost from $1,114,987.03 to $1,237,186.82. Because IDOT revisions
caused the increases, IDOT has agreed to accept the major portion of the ~ncreased
cost. They have agreed to amend their agreement from $736,400 to $899,800.
$~nce the contnbubon from 3-Corn ~s capped at $130,000.00 and the TDNR grant
port~on for the entrance turn lanes is $138,7,t0.03, the V~llage's share of the
~mprovement cost wdl be $68,646.79. Funding wdl come from available funds ~n the
MFT account.
Because of the increase m quanbbes, ~t ~s necessary to process a Change for the
~ncrease ~n the construction cost. The Final Change Order for R. W. Dunteman Co
increases the construcbon cost from $986,530.03 to $1,080,729.82. It is also
necessary to process a Rnal Change Order for the construcbon engineering contract
with $DT Construcbon Group ~ncreas~ng the construcbon engineering contract from
$69,057.00 to $ 97,057.00.
Page two
Central Road Improvements
March 16, 2000
Recommendation
I recommend that the Vdlage Board authorize the Mayor to execute the IDOT Amended
Agreement Increasing their funding hm~t from $736,400 to $899,800. I also
recommend approval of the final Change Order for R. W. Dunteman Co. from
$986,530.03 to $1,080,729 and the final Change Order for SDI Construction Group from
$69,057.00 to $97,057.00 for construction engineering.
The following cost breakdowns are provided for your information
PROJECT COSTS
Original F~nal
Design Engmeenng $ 59,400.00 $ 59,400.00
Construction $ 986,530.03 $1,080,729.82
Construction Engmeenng $ 69,057.00 $ 97,057 00
Total $1,114,987.03 $1,237,186.82
PRO3ECT COST DISTRIBUTION
Agency Onqlnal Amount Final Amount
IDOT $ 736,400.00 $ 899,800.00'
3-Com $ 130,000.00 $ 130,00000
IDNR $ 138,740.03 $ '138,740.03
Wllage $ 109,847.00 $ ,68,646.79
Total $1,114,987.03 $1,237,186.82
X:\files\eng~neer~pro3ects~.reets\cenbral\chordermm
Mount Prospect/Central Road
SectmnNo 96-00126-00-WR
AN AMENDMENT TO A JOINT VILLAGE-STATE AGREEMENT FOR A
ROADWAY WIDENING AND RESURFACING PROJECT,
IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT hereinafter referred to as
the "LA" and the STATE OF ILLINOIS, acting by and through ~ts Department of
Transportatmn and hereinafter referred to as the "STATE", entered ~nto an agreement on
October 3, 1996 for roadway improvements on Central Road between Arthur Avenue and
Busse Road, smd improvement designated as LA Section 96-00126-00-WR, STATE Job
No C-91-088-96 for constructmn and
WHEREAS, the LA and the STATE are desirous of revising the STATE's
partm~patmn portmn of the Joint Agreement to reflect the revised project design
~ncreas~ng the b~tum~nous pavement cost and also addmon of traffic signal ~nterconnect
for Central Road, ~h~ch was not included m the original agreement
BE IT FURTHER AGREED that all elements of the aforementioned agreement
not ~n conflict w~th thts ADDENDUM shall remmn ~n full force and effect
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AGREED that the Section 111-7 (100 percent) state
amount not to exceed $606,100 ~s revxsed to read as $692,600, and (50 percent) local
amount not to exceed $130,300 ~s revised to read as $207,200
Any funds requzred to complete the project ~n excess of $899,800 w~ll be the
responsibility of the Local Agency
-1-
Mount Prospect/Central Road
Sectmn No 96-00126-00-WR
BE IT FURTHER AGREED that th~s AMENDMENT shall ~nure to the benefit of
the part~es hereto, thmr successors and assigns
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
By
Mayor
Dare ., __
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By
Director of H~ghways
Date
-2-
S ~Gcn\Wp2~22ar~mtprospj tamgt, do¢
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROffICE MEMORANDUM
FROM DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE MARCH 15, 2000 ~ ~
' /
SUBJECT' PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL FINANCING
PURPOSE: To present a recommendation that the Village proceed with the Issuance of $2,165,000
of tax-exempt general obligation bonds for purposes of funding various flood control projects
BACKGROUND: The Year 2000 Budget Includes flood control projects totaling $3,251,117. Some
of larger improvements included ~n the budget are
(1) additional Improvements to Weller Creek ($2,591,500)
(2) completion of the MaplefBerksh~re improvements ($213,617)
(3) Wedgewood storm sewer Improvements ($210,000)
(4) Addison Court improvements ($120,000)
Grant proceeds are expected to fund $1.2 mdhon of project expenses Also ~ncluded in the 2000
Budget as a funding source is bond proceeds of $2,165,0000 from the sale of general obligation bonds
DISCUSSION: StafflS recommending the ~ssuanee of $2,165,000 of tax-exempt general obligation
bonds to help fund certmn flood control Improvement projects m the year 2000 The bonds would be
retired using proceeds from the one-quarter home-rule sales tax estabhshed in 1991 Th~s revenue
source ~s earmarked for flood control Improvements
It is anticipated that the bonds would be dated June 1, 2000 Interest would be prod every June 1 and
December 1 Principal would be paid on December 1 The bonds would be totally retired on
December 1, 2008 At this time we expect the average coupon rate on the bonds to be 5 06%
Attached as Exhibit 1 is the projected debt service schedule on the proposed financing As you can
see, we would be paying only the interest on the bonds for the first five years The first two years of
interest would be funded from a portion of the bond proceeds We are not able to make principal
payments until the year 2005 due to the fact all of our one-quarter home rule sales tax revenue is
committed to other flood control financings until then
Interoffice Memorandum
Proposed G O Financing
March 15, 2000
Page Two
Following ~s a summary of the proposed use of bond p~oceeds
costs of issuance $ 23,000
bond discount 12,990
capitahzed interest 218,684
project costs 1.910.326 ~
Total $2.165.000
The projected costs of ~ssuance can be broken down as follows
R V Norene and Associates Financial Adwsor $9,054
Katten Much~n & Zavis Bond Counsel $7,500
Moody's Investors Service Rating Agency Fee · $3,250
Miscellaneous Pnnting, Bond Registrar, Contingencies $3,196
A tentative financing table IS presented as Exhlblt 2 We would ant~clpate opemng sealed bids for the
bonds on May 16, 2000 The Village Board would be asked to approve the bond ordinance authorizing
the sale at ItS meeting later that evemng The bond closing would take place sometime around June 6th
The Public Works Director informs me that he is now expecting the Weller Creek ~mprovements to be
undertaken over a two-year period, rather than one I recommend the Village still proceed with the '
entire financing It is more cost effective to do one bond Issue for $2,165,000 than two bond issues
totaling the same amount Furthermore, the V~llage should be able to Invest bond proceeds at an
interest rate above the average coupon rate of the bonds since the issue would not be subject to the IRS
arbitrage regulations
RECOMMENDATION: It ~s recommended the Village Board authorize staff to proceed w~th the
Issuance of $2,165,000 of tax-exempt general obligation bonds for purposes of funding various flood
control Improvement projects
DOUGLAS R ELLSWORTH, CPA
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
I ~Debt\CorrespondenceX2000GO~BdMemo 3-14-00 doc
03/15/00 09:29 F~X 18479985503 R V.Norene Assoc [~02
TABLE A ~(~ I ~ / T- ~
Flrct in%utes% payeent$
Aug life 7,59237875
Bond yre 1G, 4~7.~
PERIOD AH~OAL
EI~DIIqO PRinCIPAL RATE INTEREST TOTAL
12/~1/~ ~,~ 54,671.25 54,671.2~
121~11~2 ~.~0 1~9~342.~ 1~9~342.50
121el/~3 ~.~ 109~342.~ 1~9,342.50
121011~ 39~e. e0 ~.e~ leo,522. Se 49~,522.5e
t2/el/~ 64s, eze. ee ' 5. ese st,e22, se 72&,e22. se
12/el/~ gse, eae.ee s.~ea 4a,4~.~ 9~,4se. ee
Tax Levy %o be Extended (AZter Capltalized Interest)
End£ag
12/~1/~ 54,$7~ 54, G7!
12/~1/~! 1~9~342 189~ 342
12/01/~2 IB9~342 54,S?1 54,671
12/~1/~3 1~9,342 ~ 1~9~342
12/~1/84 1~9,342 ~ 1~9~342
12/~1/~5 289,342 ~ 269,342
t21et/~ 49~, 522 · 49e, 522
[2/el/~ 7~22 e 726, e22
121e1/~ 9~;452 ~ 998,459
2, 9~, 378 218, ~4 2, 777,694
C~/23/00 11:58 FAX 18479988503 R ¥ Norene Assoc ~02
R.V. NORENE & Associates, Inc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, BER[ES 2000
Tentative Flnanelna Tim®table
Tuesday, Apn118, 2000 Village st~ff announce at Vtl~age Board meeting the plan to cell bonds on Tuesday,
May 16, 2000.
Thursday, April 20, 2000 R,V. Norane & Associates, Inc. (RVN&A) mall news releace regarding Tuesday, May
16, 2000 bid opening,
Fax text to Bond Buyer for 'New on Caler~a~' and 'Sealed Bids' for Monday, April
24, 2000 ed~on. RVN&A mall text of Summary Notice of S~.le to Wall Street Journal
for puUlcatlon on Monday, May 8, 2000.
- RVN&A fax Notice of ~ale to SURE BID for bid guarantee ,=tructure
Tuesday, Apnl 25. 2000 - RVN&A fax/de~iver draft of Oftic.led Statement, Oftlolai Notice of Bale/Bid Form [o
Village and Bond Counsel for review end telephone Dominant by Noon, Friday,
April 28, 2000.
Fnday, April 28, 2000 - Village telephone RVN&A with comments on OfficlaJ Statement. RVN&A provide
camera ready text d Official 8taternent, Official Notice o! Sale. id Fon'n to printer,
- RVN&A mall all Information to Moody'a for Investment rating.
- RVN&A fax to CUSIp Bureau for CUSIP number asalgnment to rnatu~les
Tuesday, May 2, 2000 - Village Board Introduce Bond Ordinance.
- RVN&A moll (first mailing) prtntod Oftlotal Statement, Official Notice of SaM/Bid Form
to dealer banks and Investment bankem/underwriters,
RVN&A provtde disk te FCI Solutlorm fo,' In~ertion of the Official Btatemsnt on the
Blocrnberg System (ov~ 20.000 screens for underwriter types and Institutional
flm~l Investors).
Monday, May 8, 2000 RVN&A publish Summa~ Notice of Sale In Chicago edit[on of the Wall Street
JoumaJ. · this adve~esrnent tells Individual Investors how to obtain the Official
b"tatement which wlll be avsllable on the Interest at w~wv.rvnorene-assoc-lnc com.
Tuesday, May 9, 2000 RVN&A ma~ (second mailing) lo Investing Institutions and Investment sd~4sors
throughout the Un~tecl States
Tuesday, May16,2000 Bond Bid Opening at 1100 A.M., C.S,T., at the officea of R,V, Norane &
.ad~x~atee, Inc., 1'/01 Lake Avenue, Suite 215, Glenvlew, Iltlncls.
Adoption of Bond Ordinaries at regular meeting of the Board that evening.
Wednesday. May 17, 2000 Depos~ory oobfled regarding global book entry Draft 'Flnal" Taxed to purchaser
and Bond Councel for approval on May 18, 2000
Thursday,
May
18,
20OO
· RVN&A complete 'Rnal' OfliciaJ Statement and provide ooples to purchaser for
daste~.butJon to Investors (wtthln SEC required ceven buslness days of the bend
(Board meetings 1st and 5rd Tuesdays)
~ 14 T W Th F ~ M T W Th F I $ M 1' W Th F
8
2 31 5 e 7 7 8._.~.9 10 11 12 18 4 SI 7 8 9 10
9 10 11 12 13 14 14 16~ 17 18 19 ~0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
16 1711B~ 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 te~ 21 22 23 24
23 24 25 20 :~7 28 29 28 29 ~0 31
R, V. Norene & Associates, Inc.
Janumy 26, 2000
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO MICHAEL E JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE MARCH 15, 2000
SUBJECT CORRIDOR DESIGN GUIDELINES - ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Background
Last year the Village Board approved a contract w~th Wolff Clements and Associates Ltd of Chicago (WCA) to
develop Corridor Design Gmdehnes for the Vdlage Their contract amount Is a not to exceed fee of $50,000
That project includes estabhsh~ng landscape and urban destgn standards for the Village's commercial corridors,
preparing design concepts for Vdlage gateways, demgnmg entry signs, and estabhsh~ng constromton and long-
term matntenanee costs for the Improvements
As the range of downtown improvement antivit~es haCe progressed, two areas outside the original scope of the
WCA contract have arisen as urban demgn oppormmt~es - mmllar in nature to those being addressed by WCA
The first such area is betng created by redesign of the southeast coroer of Northwest Highway and Main Street
(Route 83) - where the Clwe Events S~gn ~s located Relocation of the train station entrance from Mare Street to
Northwest H~ghway creates an urban design opportumty in the space between the new drive and Main Street
The second oppormmty m located at the northwest coroer of Northwest H~ghway and Emerson Street - ~n front of
the Shops and Lofts at Village Centre The not~on of a design feature m front of thru property was first rinsed as
part of the Downtown Strategic Plan - although envm~oned at Northwest Highway and Mare Street As designs
for the project progressed, Northwest Highway and Emerson became the more appropriate comer The current
plans by Norwood Builders indicate an unspemfied feature at that location
Proposal
We have discussed both of these sites w~th WCA and they concur that both present opportunities to enhance the
appearance and character of the Northwest H~ghway eorndor and the Downtown In terms of developing demgn
schemes for the rotes, I recommend that they be done as an add-on to the WCA contract for the Design Corridor
Gmdehnes By conttnmng to work w~th the same consultant on the project we help to ensure eonmstency of
design and take advantage of economies from WCA already working m Mount Prospect
WCA's proposal for the contract extra is to prepare schematic concepts for the two sttes, conmstent w~th those
being prepared for other gateways The cost for these services would be a lump sum amount of $2,400 As noted
m their letter (attached) the work would be scheduled to correspond wtth the corridor demgn work, and would fit
~n w~th demgn and construction schedules for the tram station area and Norwood projects Based on the outcome
of the m~t~al demgn work, WCA would provide an additional proposal for final demgns, constroct~on drawings,
and construction observation Cost for those future servmes would be based on the mtual design, to be developed
~n conjunction w~th the Vdlage Staff, Plan Commmmon, and Village Board
Corrtdor Destgn Gutdehnes - Additional Services
March 15, 2000
Page 2
Recommendation
Funds for preparing the lmt~al designs (as well as detaded plans and eonstmctton) are avadable for both projects
from d~fferent sources Work at the tram station s~te has received fundtng from two state grants - recently
'described m a March 2, 2000 memo to you from Glen Andler In addition, Planning Staff ~s working wtth IDOT
regarding possible funds through the operation GreenLight Program Hawng been notdied by IDOT staff that we
are m a good posmon to receive those funds, we are currently working wtth IDOT to amend the grant to ~nelude
designing and mstalhng the new plans for the comer ./ts for the Norwood s~te, funds would be avmlable for the
pro. leer through the TIF as part of the landscape program In addition, Norwood agreed during the zoning process
to contribute to the cost of constructing the gateway feature
In hght of the recently raised urban design opportumt~es presented by these two corners, the reasonable additional
cost, and the ava~lab~hty of funds, I recommend that the Village Board accept the proposal from Wolff Clements
and Associates for the ~mtlal design of landscape features at the Emerson Street and Ma~n Street sites, and that
their current contract be increased by the lump sum amount of $2,400
fl0c
H \GENW'LNG~Comdor Design Gmdehnes\extras.do¢
WOLFF CLEMENTS
ANO ASSOCIATES, LTD
March8,2000 ~^x ],~ ,*;
: ; 2000
Mr Wdham J Cooney, Jr, AICP L~..~.r:_~
.-._.3
Dlrector o f Commumty Development 2 .~_';f7, ,,
Village of Mount Prospect ':
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Ilhnms 60056
Re: Corridor Demgn Guidelines Add~tmnal Services
Dear Bill
We are pleased to respond to your request to provtde additional servtees for two more gateway feature areas as
part of the Comdor Design Guldelmes work we are presently conducting Thru work would conms.t of preparing
schematm concepts for the southeast comer of Route 83 and Northwest H~ghway at the tram station and at the
intersection of Northwest Highway and Emerson Street at the Norwood parcel
This m~tial design effort would be to prepare schematre concepts for these two areas, wbmh would be consmtent
w~th the other gateway concepts we have prewously prepared Elements rmght conmst of focaI points, wails,
plazas, benches, et cetera At the tram stataon sRe, they rmght also include the additmn of an electromc message
board
We understand that SDI Engineers are presently preparing base plans of both sites that will be made avadable to
us m AutoCAD Release 14 format Smularly, weunderstandthatMETRAhascstabhsheddes~gncntena
regarding safety and vimbfl~ty, and that thru mformatton will be provided to us for mclumon m our study
It ~s our understanding that this proposed work will be m addttlon to our exmtmg Comdor Demgn Gmdelmes
contract, yet will be subject to the same terms and condxtmns We propose to prepare these schematm demgn
concepts for a lump sum fee of $2,400 00 This work would be scheduled to correspond to the curndor demgn
work
Following the completmn of thru mxtml work, and based on the outcome of tts rewew, we would prowde a more
detailed and m-depth proposal for final design, conslructmn documents, and constructmn obscrvataon
We trust that thxs proposal xs m aecurdance w~th your request and would apprecxate your acceptance of ~t by
mgnmg the enclosed copy and returning ~t to us
Smcerely,
WOLFF CLEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, LTD
Pnnmpal
Accepted by Date
WOLFF CLEMENTS
AND ASSOCIATES, LTD
March 8, 2000 F^x ]~*,~ s4,~7
Mr William $ Cooney, Jr, AICP
D~rector of Comrnumty Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Re. Corridor Design Guidelines Additional Services
Dear Bill
We are pleased to respond to your request to provide addgmnal servmes for two more gateway feature areas as
part of the Comdor Design Gmdelmes work we are presently conducting This work would consiat of prepanng
schematic concepts for the southeast comer of Route 83 and Northwest H~ghway at the tram station and at the
mtersectmn of Northwest Highway and Emerson Street at the Norwood parcel
This mmal design effort would be to prepare schematm concepts for these two areas, whmh would be consistent
with the other gateway concepts we have prewously prepared Elements nught consist of focal points, walls,
plazas, benches, et cetera At the l~-am station site, they rmght also include the addmon of an electromc message
board
We understand that SDI Engmeers are presently preparing base plans of both sites that will be made available to
us m AutoCAD Release 14 format Smularly, we understand that METRA has established design cntena
regarding safety and visibility, and that this mformatmn will be provided to us for inclusion m our study
It is our understandmg that this proposed work will be m adthtmn to our existing Corridor Design Gmdelmes
contract, yet will be subject to the same terms and conditmns We propose to prepare these schematic design
concepts for a lump sum fee of $2,400 00 This work would be scheduled to correspond to the comdor design
work
Following the completaon of this untial work, and based on the outcome of its review, we would provide a more
detailed and m-depth proposal for f'mal design, construction documents, and cons~uctlon observatmn
We ~ust that this proposal is m accordance with your request and would appreciate your acceptance of it by
signing the enclosed copy and returning it to us
Smcerely,
WOLFF CLEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, LTD
Frank Clements, FASLA
Principal
Accepted by Date
MAYOR ~
Gerald L Farley VILLAGE MANAGER
Michael E Ianoms
TRUSTEES
TlmothyJ Corcoran Viii g f M P pe VILLAGE CLERK
PaulWm Hoefert a e o ount ros ct VelmaLowe
Rachard M Lohrstorfer
Community Development Department Phone 847/818-53:8
M~chaele W Skowron Fax 847/818-5329
trvana K Waks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Ilhnots 60056 TDD 8471392-6064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
Semor Center Thursday
50 South Emerson Street March 23, 2000
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 7 30 p m
I CALL TO ORDER
II ROLL CALL
III APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A Minutes of February 24, 2000 1 ZBA-37-99 / Downtown Redevelopment Phase IB
2 ZBA 02-2000 / Metzger Residence / 120 Yates Lane
3 ZBA-05-2000 / VOMP / Text Amendments
IV OLD BUSINESS
A ZBA-04-2000 / Kensington Restaurant / 305 Kensington Road / Condmonal Use
for the estabhshment of a fast food restaurant with a drive-through
V NEW BUSINESS
A ZBA 06-2000 / McGough Residence / 204 S I-Oka Avenue / Condmonal Use / Vana~aon
to allow construction of a front porch encroaching 5 feet into the required front yard
setback NOTE: This Case is Village Board Final
B ZBA-07-2000 / C V S / 1 E Rand Road / Conditional Use to permit construction of a
Dug Store wth a drive-through facility and associated lot coverage and setback
Variations NOTE: This Case is Village Board Final
C ZBA-08-2000 / VOMP / Text Amendments to the B3 Commumty Commercial Zoning
District NOTE: This Case Postponed to 4/27 Meeting
D ZBA-09-2000 / Fernandez-Fear Residence / 416 S Nawata Avenue / Fence Variation
NOTE: This Case is Village Board Final
VI QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
VII ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend th~s meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation
to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect,
IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD//847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-37-99 Hearing Date February 24, 2000
PETITIONER: Bruce Adreani, Norwood Builders
SUBJECT PROPERTY. Northwest Highway between Emerson St and Main St
PUBLICATION DATE: February 9, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Conditional Use for a PUD to Permit Construction of a Mixed-use Development
MEMBERS PRESENT: Memll Cotten
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Kelth Youngqmst
Arlene Juracek, Chmrperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Commumty Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Bruce Adream, Norwood Budders
Jim Duerr, Norwood Bmlders
Ron Radzik, Norwood Bmlders
Matthew Haylock, Haylock Design
Kathryn and Manro Bruno
Chairperson Arlene Jumcek called the meeting to order at 7 35 p m Minutes of the January 27, 2000 meeting were
approved, with one abstentton by Arlene Jumcek Ms Juracek announced the postponement of Case ZBA-04-2000
until the meeting of March 23, 2000 The Board heard Case ZBA-37-99 at 7 39 p m
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the item, a proposal to construct a structure containing
22,700 sq ft of commemial space and 34 condomnnum umts, a 32 on-site surface parking spaces, 18 on-street spaces
and 51 underground spaces Based on a Request for Proposals tssued last year m support of the Downtown Strategic
Plan, the Village Board selected the apphcant as the developer for Phase lB of Downtown redevelopment - a mixed-
use development on Northwest Highway m the downtown Phase IA, conststmg of 205 condommmms and a pubhc
parkmg lot, was approved in 1999 and is currently under construction
Mr. Perkms described the subject property, a vacant parcel on Northwest Highway between Main Street and Emerson
Street, and added that the Village has acquired the property and has a development agreement w~th the apphcant for
the purchase and development of the property
Mr Perkins stated that the proposed development would consist of 22,700 gross square feet of commercial space on
the ground floor and a total of 34 eondommmm units on the second and third floor He stated that the site would be
served by 51 parking spaces m an underground garage beneath the principal structure, 33 surface spaces on the site,
and 18 on-street spaces to be created with the development
Mr Perkins stated that the stte is zoned BSC Central Commercial Core district, that "Planned unit developments,
mixed commercial and residential" are listed as Cond,t,onal Uses m the district and that the proposed mined-use
development may be permitted in the zoning thstr~ct following approval of the PUD as a Conthtlonnl Use
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-37-99
Arlene Juracek. Chairperson Page 2
He then sa~d that the apphcant had submitted rewsed plans addressing some of the comments Included In the staff
report and d~strtbuted cop~es of revised plans to the ZBA
Mr Perkins descrtbed the proposed development's building setbacks, density, and budding height and stated that the
proposal meets Zomng Code requirements for those items
Mr Perkins then described the applicant's submitted elevations and contrasted them with the elevations tneluded in the
applicant's response to the Village's R F.P He also described a proposed outdoor dining area to the north of the
Emerson Street fagade and gave staff's position that the area would better reflect the original proposal and be better
utthzed as a semi-enclosed dining area allowtng for use of the area most of the year, rather than just in the summer
He then stated Village staff's other concerns with the proposed elevations that the proposed budding materials lack
the degree of contrast shown m the RFP elevations, that much of the architectural detail has been ehmtnated for the
building roof He added that Staff has met with the appheant to discuss those issues and building materials to be used
at the site, and that the applicant agreed to address staffconcems and identify building materials prior to Village Board
consideration
Mr Perklnsdescr~bedparkmgfortheslte He stated that the total parkmg requtrement for the s~te would be 135 paces
and a total of 102 spaces are currently proposed He added that,' because the slte does not meet its parking
requirement, the developer must enter into a parking agreement with a nearby property or properties to provide the
additional 33 parking spacas He also spoke about the importance of keeping parking on and around the site available
for customers and VtSltOrs to the site, rather than employees and commuters and recommended requiring the applicant
to provide the Village w~th an agreement to allow for Village enforcement of parking t~me hmlts He also described
changes to the existing Vdlage parking lots south of and west of Village Hall th? would accompany the development
Mr Perkins revtewed the applicant's prehmmary landscape plans for the development He stated that the plans
include pr~mardy hardscape areas with small planting areas along the Elmhurst Road and Emerson Street frontages and
that the plans follow the requirements of the Mount Prospect Streetscape Plan between the buildings and the edge of
pavement He added that Vdlage staff ~s working with the developer to find an approprtate focal point, m the form of
landscaping, public art, street furniture, or some combination of those elements for the comer of Northwest H~gh~ay
and Emerson Street
Mr. Perkins described provlstons m the Downtown Redevelopment Plan calhng for specialty retad businesses and
businesses w~th mght and weekend actlwty He added that the apphcant and Vdlage staff are workmg to establish a
mutually acceptable method of ensuring that the m~x of commercial uses m the structure wall fulfil the requirements of
the Plan
Mr Perkins then brtefly discussed the request m terms of Zomng Code Standards for Planned Umt Developments and
Conditional Uses and gave Staff's recommendation for approval of the proposed Planned Umt Development, w~th the
cond~ttons included In the staff report
Ms Juraeek asked tfBoard members had any questtons for Jeffand asked tf requtred pubhc not,ce had been given for
the ttem Mr Perkins stated that notice in the form cfa newspaper legal ad, marled nottees, and stgns had been gtven
Ms Juraeek then asked ffthe petitioner wanted to speak
Bruce Adream, Jtm Duerr, Ron Radztk, and Matthew Haylock w~re sworn tn Mr Adream stated thts development
would be the gateway to Mount Prospect and that the imtlal rendering was submitted with the hope of being chosen for
the project He said he IS impressed wtth Village staff on the timely acquisition of the property and stte preparation
He stated that, in further work with staff and the architect, they have prepared a new rendering, which IS before the
Board tonight He responded to comments that the latest renderings were boring He said that on the new destgn,
some colors are different and no Dryvtt will be used, also that the final project may have different brtek colors based
on availability The new rendermg has some deletions and some improvements over the original He approached the
easel to point out the d~fferenees He said that tn order to make the project more pedestrian friendly and increase
wstblhty to the intertor stores, they had included outdoor dining, for which they have received many favorable
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-37-99
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
comments He pointed out changes m the original br~ck arches which wotl[d be more expensive than the original
drawings but more symmetrical and similar to those used for shops m France or England The building w~ll be 52'
high at the peak because each floor is more than 10' high and the apartments would have higher cedmgs as they will be
called "the lofts of Vdlage Centre" He said they are wllhng to add any faux chimneys, weathervanes, etc, as deslred
Mr Rogers asked about the poss~bihty of eliminating dormers Mr Ronald Redzik of Norwood Builders came
forward to say the dormers were necessary as they would be active skylights which would provide light to the loft
condos Ms Juraeek said she would like to see the plan include the original faux chimneys
Mr Adreanl said more color could be provided by using different color awnings and that building materials would be
submitted for final approval Mr Adreani also said Norwood would help with fund raising for a focal feature for the
area
With reference to the conditions recommended by staff, Mr Adreant asked that HKM Architects be deleted from
staffs conditions and replaced by Hayloek He asked that the outdoor dining area concept be allowed to remain Mr
Adream stated they would be very willing to work with the Village on selecting a tenant mix and that Norwood would
be amenable to working with staff on parking lot redesign He also said Norwood would contact Bank One and
various area churches regarding the availabihty of parking spaces In their lots With reference to staffs condition #9,
Mr Adream d~rected the Board's attention to the chart of landscape materials they had prepared for the project He
stated Norwood would work with the Village regarding brick pavers and outdoor furniture to be used for a focal point
Engineering plans are not finalized, Mr Adream said they are working with the different government agencies on the
approval of those
Ms Juracek asked about the nature of permits Mr Adream said they would provide the sewer and water runoff and
drainage of the parking area design to MWRD for permits Ms Juracek said the site elevations and material choices
seem tentative and would building samples be ready for submission to the Village Board quickly Mr Adream
reminded the Board about the brick shortage and said Norwood works with many companies and will have a d~splay at
the property site
Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development, stated that there were brick problems with the other
developments being built by Norwood He agreed it is a challenge to get the bricks, but it also is important to know if
the bricks and other materials to be used are available Mr. Blue said that as part of its recommendation the ZBA
should decide which elevation they prefer so Norwood can bring it to the Vdlage Board with definite materials
Ms Juracek said she liked the original design because of the variety of materials used She said she d~d not want the
proposed development to be the same color brick throughout the project and not the same color as the Clocktower
Condominiums Ms Juraeek also noted the importance of striping the Northwest Highway on-street parking spaces
Mr Rogers suggested substituting pre-cast concrete panels w~th the appearance of bricks for the brick, as shown in the
original proposal He also stated his feeling that the original elevation was desirable since ~t was more "fanciful" and
had more variety ~n the roof line Mr Rodgers indicated his desire that there by no Dryv~t material on the building He
had no ~ssue with the Main Street end of the bmldmg being octagonal (a change from rounded m the original) and
approved of shortening the Emerson Street fagade ~n order to open up the courtyard Mr Rodgers indicated that his
main concerns were that there be sufficient varaety in the color and texture of the construction materials
Mr Adream smd that type of concrete panel Mr Rodgers suggested was usually used for ~ndustrial and office
buildings Mr Rogers noted it is often used for Chicago rowhouses to provide more variety Mr Adreani also said he
would prefer using brick m different colors for variety Mr Adream also said the comer of Northwest Highway and
Main Street had been redesigned in the revised elevation in order to be symmetrical with the one at Emerson
Mr Rogers said smooth and masonry surfaces should be utilized and roofs should be different types Mr Adream sa~d
white, rough-faced or Renaissance stone would provide a lighter look, and that they would go back to coloring board
to provide more variety
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-37-99
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 4
Kelth Youngqmst said he had served on the original Ad Hoc Committee and that committee had been very excited
about the original drawings for the downtown area, which were prowded by Norwood Builders However he
understood that they were conceptual and m~ght change somewhat Mr Youngquist sa~d the chimney removal ~s
sattsfactory to him and he sa~d the dormer utdlzation was a great ~dea He said h~s preference would be to hold down
the number of changes of materials and colors to four or five, and to avoid a "circus" appearance by keeping long
expanses of the var,ous materials He asked ffthe wing shown on the Emerson elevation of the drawing was an attempt
to continue around the comer
Mr. Adream said that was a first floor commercml extension only Mr Perkins sa~d the first floor of the building
actually extends out a few more feet and the budding steps back on the second floor This is an extension of the
¢ommercml space in the rear - allowing for larger and more usable spaces Mr Adream pointed out that ~t will be
important for renting the spaces (and the wabfl~ty of the businesses) to ensure v~s~bflity to the rear
Mr Youngqutst satd the original plans looked beautiful from Northwest Highway and he was glad to see Norwood ts
carrying the exact level detad around budding, and he wanted to comphment them for that He said pre-cast slabs, as
suggested by Mr Rogers, would be good for creating variety m the facade Mr Younqmst said he has no problem
w~th the absence of faux chimneys and weathervanes
Michael Blue said Norwood employs a third party broker as part of the rental process and they have agreed that the
Village wtll have and oppormmty to meet wtth the broker
Ms Juracek satd we would not want only restaurants but other types of businesses Mr Adream agreed
Leo Floros asked ff there would be ~tngle stores going all the way through the building and ~f any of the stores m~ght
be offices Mr Adreant said the comer stores would probably go through but the others would be stores facing
Northwest Htghway and backed up by a common corridor, wtth another set of stores factng the courtyard He smd
there would be fifteen or sixteen stores ~n the bmldmg
Mr Blue remarked that storefronts on parking lot stde hkely would not be of the same cahber as on the Northwest
H~ghway s~de The stores facing the street would be businesses that reqmre more wstbthty Therefore, ~t was
reasonable to expect offices or some service bustnesses on the courtyard s~de
Adream sa~d they had constdered the ~dea of larger stores but the best retail use ts smaller, caste? to rent, stores
Mr Rogers sa~d he agreed w~th the outdoor dmmg concept as n would give more ws~bflity to the stores facing the
courtyard
Merrdl Cotten sa~d he considered the question to be whether we ~vant the development to be moro quaint, as m the
original renderings, or more modem day, hke the new drawings He asked ~f we wanted to be more hke Long Grove
or have a moro dlst~nctive look He added that using d~fferent brick colors would g~ve a very desirable appearance
Ms Juracek smd we were not stnwng to look hke another Long Grove but we do hke variety She also noted that the
project should not look hke a building built at one t~me, but hke buildings built at d~fferent t~mes She smd symmetry
~s ~mportant, but the facade should not look hke a monohth She suggested the builder vary the colors and architecture
as much as possible
Kelth Youngqmst asked how water runoff would be handled Mr Adream smd that there will be a flat roof in the
middle of the buildings with ~ntenor drams connected to the storm sewer system and a gutter system along outside
area He also stated that trash storage will be in indoor dumpsters, which wdl be taken out through the rear of the
building
Ms Juracek asked if there were any more questions or any questions from the audience There being none, she closed
the Publ,c Hearing at 8 42 and asked for d~scuss~on by the Zomng Board Ms Juracek smd this proposal meets the
needs of the Vdlag¢ and has had a lot of pre-planning and a lot of groundwork by many people She said we had heard
much d~seuss~on about staffs recommendatmns particularly recommendatton #3, whmh pertains to an outdoor dmmg
area She said Mr Yoangqmst and Mr Rogers have both made persuastve statements m support of the petitioner's
v~ew that vlstbd~ty is cr~t~cal to tenants Ms Juracek smd he would support that wew and suggested removal of
condition #3
Rmhard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for a Cond~tmnal Use to allow the proposed Planned Umt
Development with the condittons ~ncluded in the staff report, wtth the ebmmat~on of condtt~on 3 and the addition of
the word "general" before the word "conformance" m cond~tton 1, Ke~th Youngqmst- seconded the motton
UPON ROLL CALL AYES' Cotten, Floros, Rogers, Youngqmst, and Juracek
NAYS None
Motmn was approved 5-0
At 9 25 p m, after two other cases were heard, Pdchard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith
Youngqmst The motion was approved by vome vote and the meeting was adjourned
Barbara Swtatek, Planning Secretary
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-02-2000 Hearing Date February 24, 2000
PETITIONER' Lawrence Metzger
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 120 Yates Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: February 9, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Variation to allo~ a wood deck to encroach 3' into the side interior yard
setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floras
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngqmst
Arlene Jumcek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Commumty Development
Jeffery Perktns, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES. Lawrence Metzger
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7 35 p m Minutes of the January 27, 2000 meeting were
approved, wtth one abstention by Arlene Juracek Ms Jumeek announced the postponement of Case ZBA-04-2000
unttl the meeting &March 23, 2000 The Board heard Case ZBA-37-99 and at 8 48, Chatrperson Juracek tntroduced
Case ZBA-02-2000, a Vartatton to allow a wood deck to encroach 3' into the side tntenor yard setback and stated that
the VtIlage Board's dectston ts final for this case
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, stated that public notice had been given and tntroduced the staff memorandum for the item, a
variatton to allow construction of a wood deck that would encroach three feet into the required 7 5' s,de setback He
stated that the property Is an emsttng home on a 75' X 138' comer lot on a restdential street wtth a front setback of
30 66' from Yates Lane and a 20-foot setback from the stde street, Thayer Street, whtch tt faces He further stated that
the petitioner is seektng to replace an existing 14' X 20' wood deck tn the side yard and that the house's stde setback ts
18 6 feet, so the deck ts 4 6' from the property hne. He added that based on Building Division records, the existing
deck appeared to have been built wtthout a permtt
Mr Perkins briefly described the proposal m terms of the Zomng Code standards and, based on a lack ora findmg of
hardship, gave staff's recommendation that the ZBA deny the proposed Vartatton
Mr Juraeek asked ff Board members had any questions for Jeff She then asked if the petttloner wanted to speak
Lawrence Metzger explained he was asking for a Vanatton to build a deck 3' from thetr lot hne Mr Metzger passed
out pictures of his house to the Board members He explained that his house ts on a comer lot and consequently his
back yard is to the side of his neighbor's house He explatned that the original concrete patto and deck work is
substandard and needs replacement He stated the proposed deck would not infringe on the neighbor's privacy He
said his deck is completely out of sight of any neighbors as It is surrounded by spruce trees and a fence He stated he
wdl also install a new fence m the near future
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-02-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Rmhard Rogers asked whether the neighbor's dtmng room window looked out at their deck Mr Metzger said no, tile
window ts completely behind the spruce trees
Merrill Cotten asked if the concrete patio had been part of the original house Mr Metzger said tt had and that the
decks had been added later He explained the deck's posts just rest on the patio, they do not have concrete footings
Zonmg Board members asked how the deck work had originally passed inspection, but Mr Floros remmded them that
the property was not part of the Village when the house was constructed
Mr Rogers said the petitioner did have a hardship because the lot layout had his backyard adjacent to the neighbor's
stdeyard He also noted that the fence and trees do conceal the deck from the neighbor He stated the Variation could
be allowed without setting a precedent due to the unusual relationship of the lots
Ms Juracek asked, if this Variation were allowed, would future owners of this house be able to extend their braiding
out to the same hne the deck would be Mr Perkins said Variations are absolute and would allow extension of the
house He added that the Zoning Ordinance does allow a condition to be placed on the Variation that would allow only
the deck to encroach At 9 05, Chairperson Juracek closed the Pubhc Hearing and asked for discussion from the
Board There was no further discussion, and Ms Juracek asked for a roll call on the motion
Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for a Variation for the exclusive use to allow an uncovered
wood deck to encroach 3' into the reqmred side yard setback Leo Floros seconded the motion
UPON ROLL CALL AYES Cotten, Floros, Youngqmst, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS None
Mouon was approved 5-0
At 9 25 p m, after another case was heard, Pachard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Ketth Youngqmst
The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-05-2000 Hearing Date February 24, 2000
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
PUBLICATION DATE. February 9, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Text Amendments to the CR Conservation Reereatton Zomng Dtstnct
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo FIoros
Richard Rogers
Ketth Youngqmst
Arlene Juracek, Chmrperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ehzabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: M~chael Blue, AICP, Deputy Dtrector of Commumty Development
Jeffery Perkms, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES' None
Chmrperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7 35 p m Mtnutes of the January 10, 2000 meeting were
approved, wtth one abstentmn by Arlene Juraeek Ms Juracek announced the postponement of Case ZBA-04-2000
until the meeting of March 23, 2000 The ZBA heard two cases At 9 06, Ms Juraeek opened Case ZBA-05-2000,
proposed Text Amendments to the CR Conservatton Recreation Zoning Dtstrmt and stated that the Village Board's
dee~ston ~s final for th~s case
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, stated that pubhc notme had been g~ven and ~ntroduced the staff memorandum for the ttem,
Text Amendments to the CR Conservation Recreatmn Zomng Dtstrmt He gave a brief htstory of the CR D~stnct and
described the problems created for local Park D~stncts by the provtsmns of the Dtstnct
Mr Perkins then reformed the Zomng Board that the Mt Prospect Park D~strlet ts m the process of master planning
and updating all of their parks Prehm~nary rewews of proposed changes to the parks tnd~eate that future plans for
many parks would be ~mposstble under current zomng standards wtthout numerous Vartattons He stated that, m the
interests of facilitating the prowston of needed recreational faethttes, Village and Park D~stnct Staffs undertook a
comprehensive revtew of ex~st~ng and needed factht~es m local parks to detenmne appropriate regulatmas to prowde
for adequate park faefllttes and minimize Impacts on adjacent restdentml properties
Mr Perkins then summarized the proposed changes to the D~stnct
Addition of unlighted ball fields as permitted uses The current text includes fields as permttted uses
Addmon of hghted fields as contht~onal uses
Reductton of reqmred setbacks for structures other than braidings, including minor structures such as play eqmpmant
from 50' to 25' when adjacent to res~denttal properttes and 10' from other property hnes
Reduction of reqmred setbacks for bmldmgs from property hnes shared wtth non-resldentml properttes from 50' to the
setback reqmred for the non-restdenttal
Inereasmg the height hmtt for structures other than buildings to 60'
Addttton of promstons to allow for btke paths, s~dewalks, jogging trails, and stmflar facthttes up to 10' m wtdth ~n
setbacks
Zonmg Board of Appeals ZBA-05-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chmrperson Page 2
Mr Perkins stated that, as described m the staff report, the amendments meet the Zoning Code Standards for Text
Amendments and gave staff's recommendation of approval of the proposed Text Amendments
Ms Juraeek asked ifZomng Board members had questions for Jeff, and asked If he had worked with the Park Dtstrmts
m formulating these amendments Mr Perkins said he had spoken with all the Park Districts He said River Trails
Park District had an issue with the 60' height limit, as the Old Orchard Golf Course had a problematic tee for the 16th
hole and golf balls are going into the pool across the street River Trails Park District would hke to install a strncture
with netting to keep the balls out of the pool Mr Perkins said they will need a Variation to do that
Keith Youngqmst asked if the wireless service facility referred to in the section was a cell tower and can they be
anywhere on the property as long as they are less than 60'. Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community
Development stated cell towers are handled in a separate section of the Zoning Ordinance, 14 313
There was discussion among the members about cell towers and the wording m the text amendment Ms Juracek
asked if wording could be changed to read "No other structure shall exceed 60~ In height except as permitted in section
14 313"
Richard Rogers asked if a cell tower of 70~ could be erected Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community
Development, said the Ordinance reads "a park must be more than six acres for a 70' tower"
Leo Floros said that requirement eliminated most neighborhood parks
In response to a question about creating non-conformities, M~chael Blue said staff had spent a year walking through
the parks and th~s amendment had been written for as many conditions as possible He said 95% of ex,sting non-
conformities wall be dealt with by these amendments
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval for the proposed Text Amendments with one modification Richard
Rogers seconded the motion At 9 15, Chairperson Juraeek closed the Public Heanng and asked for d~scussion from
the Board
UPON ROLL CALL AYES Cotten, Floros, Youngqmst, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS None
Motion was approved 5-0
At 9 25 p m, R~chard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Kelth Youngqmst Th~ motion was' approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned
Barbara Swratek, Planning Secretary
Je, J~s,~anner
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE COMMISSION
AGENDA
Thursday, M~rch 23, 2000
7:00 p.m.
Police and Fire Building
112 East Northwest Highway
1" Floor Tmlmng Room
I Call to Order
II Approval of Minutes - January 27, 2000
HI Chairman's Report
IV D~scussion Regarding Fire Department 5-Year Plan
V Fire Department Pre-Budget Discussion
VI Finance Director's Report
VII Other Business
VIII Next Meeting: April 27, 2000
NOTE. Any m&wdual who would hke to attend this mectmg but because of a dlsablhty needs
some accommodauon to pamexpate should contact the Finance Director's Office at 100 South
Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, (847) 392-6000, ext. 5277, TDD (847) 392-6064.
FINANCE COMMISSION
Minutes of the Meeting
January 27, 2000
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. Those present included Chairman John Korn and
Comnussloners Charles Bennett, John g-ngel, Betty Launer, Jim Momson, Tom Pekras, and Ann
Smilanie. Commissioner George Busse arrived at 7:30 p.m. Also present were Finance D~reetor
Douglas Ellsworth and Deputy Finance Director Carol Wldmer. Commissioner Vmce Groehocmsh
was absent.
II Approval of Minutes
The minutes of November 4, 1999 were approved as submitted
1II Chmrman's Report
John Korn updated the Finance Commissmn members on Village Board actions and discussions that
took place m November and December 1999 and January 2000
IV Discussion Regarding Proposed 2000 Work Plan
Jim Momson stated that he felt the budget revaew schedule followed by the Finance Comrmss~on last
year worked out very well. Comnussioners Tom Pekras and John Engel both agreed. George Busse
asked if there were any issues the staff or the Village Board wanted the Finance Comnusslon to
review. Mr. Ellsworth mentioned that staff is beginning discussions on a new Village Hall. There
are plans to set up a task force, wtuch will meet several t~mes during the next few months Mr.
Ellsworth reported that a member of the Finance Comrmssxon has been invited to par~eipate on the
task force. After some discussion, it was decided that Ann Smilamc would represent the Finance
Commission on the task force.
Mr. Ellsworth mentioned that the Fire Department will be presenting their five-year plan to the
Vffiage Board at a February Committee of the Whole mcetmg. The members of thc Finance
Commission agreed that they would like the F~re Department to make a sinular presentation at the
Finance Commission's March meetmg.
Jim Mormon asked for an update on the Village's purchasing pohey. Betty Launer stated she was
interested m learning more about the Vdlage's purcl~a~mg process Mr. Ellsworth smd he would send
a copy of the Village's purchasing policy with the next Finance Comnussion agenda.
After additional discussion an agenda was prepared for the Year 2000. A copy of the agenda is
attached.
V Other Business
Ann Smdamc asked several quemons related to the Revenue and Expenditure Report which
~omm~ssmn members recmve on a monthly basis.
V Finance D~rector's Report
Mr Ellsworth distributed the Year 2000 Annual Budgets He also reported that the Vdlage had an
opportunity to sell the private acttvxty volume cap to the Ilhnois Development Finance Authority. The
Authority ~will use the tax exempt financing to assist a developer in purchasing and improving the
Centennial Apartments. The Vdlage wtll re_~liTe revenue of $53,000 from flus sale
VI AdJournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8.35 p m The February 24 meeting was cancelled The next meeting
wall be March 23.
Respectfully subnutted
Carol L. W~dmer
Deputy Finance Dlzector
Enclosure
CLWsm
2
AGENDA
WELLER CREEK AD HOC COMMITTEE
MARCH 22, 2000
CONFERENCE ROOM B
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS (~0056
7 00 PM
I CALL TO ORDER
Z PRESENTATION OF EARTH TECH SURVEY RESULTS AND FINAL CONCEPT PLANS
~ DISCUSSION OF SURVEY RESULTS AND FINAL CONCEPT PLANS
/+ OTHER BUSINESS
5 NEXT MEETING
6 ADJOURNHENT
ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT, BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS
SOME ACCOMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, PLEASE CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS AT 8/+7 870
(TDD 8/+7 5c)2 1255)
WELLER CREEK AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING
OCTOBER 13, 1999
7:00 PM
Pubhe Works Director Glen Andler called the meeting to order at 7 05 PM (List of attendees is
attached ) Mr. Andler introduced everyone present, then gave a short overvmw of the award
winning Weller Creek Bank StabIlizatton, Phase I project The phase included ratsing the eleva-
tton of the Emerson Street vehmular bridge, replacement of the Main Street pedestrian bridge,
and stablhzatIon of the creek banks between Emerson and Mmn Streets
He informed the committee that the Village has been notified they will receive Illinois Ftrst
funds an the mount of $1 million through the efforts of State Representative (and former Village
of Mount Prospect mayor) Carolyn Krause These funds, combined with Village funds allocated
for flood control (in the amount of $1 6 million) will be used to finance the Phase II project,
which Includes the area remaimng between Route 83 and School Street
The Weller Creek Ad Hoc Commtt~ee organtzed for Phase I will agatn be used for Phase II as a
means to keep the restdents along Weller Creek appraised of what ts being proposed He pointed
out that the Village has agreed to undertake tins project only wtth the understanding that we
would have the support of the restdents As was necessary tn Phase I, there will agatn be the
need for major tree removal These trees will have to be removed to allow for sun penetratton
that will encourage growth of the vegetation that is needed to stabilize the banks and prevent
them from eroding
Mr Andler introduced ProJect Engineer Melcy Pond and Landscape Architect Paul Schwartz
from Earth Teeh, our consultant, who explained to the committee the existing creek condmons
and where we need to go from here They showed examples of typical cross sections and bank
treatments proposed for tins project
Discussion followed on the Issue of right-of-way dedication Sean Dorsey pointed out that some
of the residents own to the center of the creek and property owners will need to dedicate the nec-
essary rights-of-way before the project can proceed
Meley Pond spoke about the need to stabihze the banks to control erosion and the solutions they
(Earth Tech) are proposing. She smd that it ~s dangerous to leave it as is Steep drop-offs along
the creek should be made more gradual during stabilization of the slopes Every time it rains,
more of the soil is washed offthe slopes and is washed downstream Bank stabilization will also
improve the quality of the water. During bad storms, tree limbs come down on utilities, winch
sometimes results in power outages With this plan, we'll take down all the dead, damaged, and
undercut trees, thus reducing the threat of utility interruptions W~th alignment of the creek,
some people lose property, some gain Ms Pond showed a slide depicting the center of the creek
easement She also showed a plan view depicting lot lines, the Weller Creek Drainage Dtstrlct
easement, the MWRD easement, and utility easements She pointed out the areas m Phase II
where private property owners own to the middle of the platted creek
Mrs Pond showed a slide of a typical proposed cross section, with much of the vegetatton/trees
removed. She described some of the proposed stabihzation methods Sheet piling will be tn-
stalled m some areas. A-jacks will be installed on the other areas A-jacks also allow for growth
1 of 3
of low-growang, sofl-stabthzlng vegetation A hard bottom of some kdnd would be Installed to
facthtate maintenance act~wt~es
Grace De V~to asked about drmnage behind the sheet pthng Ms Pond ~nfonned her that a p~pe
would be ~nstalled to funnel the water that ~s trapped behind the sheet paling out to the creek
Paul Schwartz smd that there was an ~ssue wath the bridge at Route 83 bmng cattawampus (at an
angle) and the bridge would be redone as part of the Route 83 project Melcy Pond smd she ~s
coor&nat~ng tlus wath the state's design consultant
Scan Dorsey asked how many trees would be removed Glen Andler answered there would be
substanttal tree removal on the south sxde to allow for sun penetration for the soil-stabthzlng
vegetatxon
Discussion followed on the need to remove certmn trees Melcy Pond stressed the need to re-
move dead, damaged, undercut/and nmsance trees and nmsance vegetation She smd that some
of these plantings have been undercut several feet by erosion
Grace De V~to asked ffthere was also a problem w~th sandy soft
Melcy Pond smd that they'll try to map out where the sandy softs are, so their design wtll address
that ~ssue as well Paul Schwartz smd a drmn tale would be ~nstalled laterally, perpendmular to
the slope ~n those areas
.Tom Wasmund and Ehsabeth Hegel pointed out that they had trees m their back yards that came
down
Melcy Pond reiterated that appropriate trees and shrubs wall be planted, and the Vdlage w~ll
eventually take over mmntenance of the property Fences that are in the way of constmctmn wall
be removed, and the Village will replace them at the property hnes
Ehsabeth Hegel referred to the sheer and dangerous drop-off at Grace De V~to's property (m the
Phase I area), and she asked if a fence would be ~nstalled there Glen Andler answered that a
fence wall be installed at Ms De V~to's property hne (at 701 S Main St) and at Mrs
Marturano's property (at 700 S. Emerson)
Melcy Pond stated that the solutions they wall be des~gmng wall be based on structural and b~o-
engmeenng apphcatious A-jacks and vegetatton would be used as much as possible, and the
channel wall be located m the center of the easement wherever possxble
'Glen Andler explmned that a complete survey would be done to locate all property lines, plot out
exactly where the center of the creek ~s and then come up w~th a recommendation as to where the
creek should be located to F~nd~ngs wall be presented to the Village Board and the homeowners
as a group
Dxscusslon followed about filhng ~n certmn areas Glen explmned that property that ~s lost can-
not be replaced The state will not allow us to decrease the channel capacxty, we can't add any
more dirt
Sean Dorsey asked If, once the survey is done, can the Village can decide which trees will be
removed If we tell the residents that we'll take out a lot of trees, we're liable to meet up with a
lot of resistance Glen Andler smd that we should be able to ldenufy most of the necessary tree
removals However, dunng constmcUon tins may change
Sean Dorsey asked if we had to ~nfonn the homeowners that we are doing a survey
Glen Andler smd that a pubhc meeting will be held including all residents along the creek Thls
public meeting wall take place at a Village Board meeting, where a formal presentation will be
made The presentation wall also include a discussion on property lines and surveys Earth Tech
will also g~ve a presentation about trees and fences and material to be installed--much like Phase
I was handled
Grace De Vlto commented that the Village Board made themselves very available dunng the
Phase I project
Melcy Pond invited questions
Ehsabeth Hegel asked if this (Phase II) project would be completed ~n one year
Glen Andler said it's too early to tell, but there is the possibility the project will take two con-
struct~on seasons Because of the Route 83 project, work wall start on the west side and work
downstream As a staging area, we wall use the Village lot on Hmwatha
Melcy Pond told the committee members that they may share all information, notinng is conti-
dentlal They will start the project ~n another month
Grace De Vlto said that, where people have existing structures in the channel (as stopgap meas-
ures), these wall be removed and/or replaced by a wail, A-jacks, vegetation, etc
Scan Dorsey added that one of the benefits of thru project is that the Village wall have mainte-
nance responslinhtles as a result
Glen thanked the cormnittee and told them that we wall keep them appraised of the project prog-
ress and wall schedule a second meeting soon
The meeting adjourned at 8'20 PM
Respectfully submitted,
Tmdy M. Deutschmann
Public Works Secretary
X ~FILEShcROIqIOmCREEKS\WELLERLr'HASE 2 AD HOC COMMITI~Fdl0-I 3 99 MIIqUTI~$ DOC
3 of 3
Village of Mount Prospect
Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee
October 13, 1999
Pubhc Works Facility, 1700 W. Central Road
7 00 PM
Name Address Phone
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L Farley ~ Mmhael E Janonls
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
T~mothy J Corcoran Velma Lowe
Paul Wm Hocfert
~,ch~dM Lo~o~er Village of Mount Prospect
Dennis 13 Prlkkel Phone 847/818 5328
Michaele W Skowron Fax 847/818-5329
Irvana Y. Wdks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD 847/392-6064
NOTICE
THE MONDAY, MARCH 20, MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD HAS BEEN
CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING.
Dated thru 13th day of March, 2000
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L Farley ~ Michael E Janoms
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
T,mothy JPaul Wm Cor¢oranHo¢£ert Village of Mo unt P rospect v~,ma Lowe
Richard M Lohrstorfer
De~,so ~,~kc, Community Development Department Phone 847/81S 5328
M~chaele W Sko~on Fax 847/818 5329
t~a K W,lk~ 100 South Emerson S~eet Mount Prospect, Ilhnoxs 60056 TDD 847a92 6064
BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CANCELLATION NOTICE
THE MEETING SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22, 2000 HAS
BEEN CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT
MEETING.
Dated tbas 13th day of March, 2000
MINUTES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COFFEE WITH COUNCIL
SATURDAY, MARCH 11, 2000
9:00 A.M.
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 9 00 a m Trustees present were Hoefert,
Lohrstorfer, Pnkkel and Wdks Staf~fpresent were Assmtant Village Manager Strahl and Finance
Dtrector Ellsworth
Elmer Collin. 1 W. Hiawatha Trail
Mr. Elmer Colhn came to the Coffee with Counml just to say hello Mr Colhn comphmented
the Board and Staff on the fact that th~ngs were runmng smoothly ~n the Village
Mr. David Schein. 700 lvanhoe
Mr. Dawd Sehein came to the Coffee w:th Council to commend the Board on setthng the
Martmez, Moser and Medrano lawsmts Mr Sche~n thought that settlement was the right thing
to do, and was best for the commumty
The meeting adjourned at 10.35 a m
Respectfully submttted,
Douglas R. Ellsworth
F~nance Director