HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 52-03 12/16/2003 ESOLUTION NO. 52-03
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETVVEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE coUNcIL OF GOVERNMENT
TO SHARE LITIGATION EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE INFRASTRUCTURE
MAINTENANCE FEE (IMF) CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
(PRIMECO)
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect ('~he Village'S, as members of
the Northwest Municipal Conference ("the Council of Government'S, have determined that it WOUld
be in the best interests of the Village to participate with the Council of Government in sharing
specific litigation costs associated with a challenge to the constitutionality of the collection of an
Infrastructure Maintenance Fee ("IMF'~; and
WHEREAS, the intergovernmental agreement for the sharing of litigation expenses, being the
subject of this Resolution specifies the portion of litigation expenses to be paid by the Village of
Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk is authorized to attest
his signature on the agreement between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Council of
Government, being the subject of this Resolution,
SECTION TWO: That a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof
as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
Corcoran, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Hoefert
PASSED and APPROVED this 16th day of December, 2003.
Gerald L. ia~rley, Mayo~ '///~
ATTEST:
Velma~~.~Lo/~C~.~:illa g~e ~Ci(~ r k~~
H:\CLKO\fiIes\WlN\RES~Auth Intergovt Agrrnt, PdmeCojawsuit $$$,Dec,03.doc
GREEMENT FOR THE SHARING OF LITIGATION EXPENSES
This Agreement is hereby entered into by each municipality and Council of
Government (referred to herein as "COG") executing a signature page confirming that they
are a party to this Agreement and accept all terms herein.
Whereas, various telephone service providers in the State of Illinois, customers of wireless
telephone service providers and customers of landline telephone service providers have
been engaged in litigation against various municipalities and other public agencies of the
State of Illinois in relation to the enforceability and constitutionality of the Municipal
Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee Act, 35 ILOS 635/1 et seq.,
(hereinafter referred to as the "IMF") (said litigation collectively referred to as the
"Litigation");
Whereas, in June 2001, the Illinois Supreme Court held the IMF to be unconstitutional as
applied to customers of wireless service providers, however, the Court did not decide the
issue of the constitutionality of the IMF as applied to customers of landline service
providers;
Whereas, on March 28, 2003, the Circuit Court of Cook County certified the Litigation as a
class action (a) identifying plaintiffs as members of three sub-classes, and (b) identifying
defendant municipalities as members of three sub-classes, as specified in the court's order
of March 28, 2003 (and as clarified in the court's order dated August 5, 2003);
Whereas, the Circuit Court of Cook County appointed the Village of Skokie as the defendant
class representative for all three defendant sub-classes and appointed Jack Siegel of
Holland and Knight LLC as defendant class counsel unless a municipality enters an
appearance through separate counsel;
Whereas, the parties hereto have decided not to opt-out of the Litigation and therefore
agree to jointly provide funds and cover the costs of legal fees and other expenses
associated with the Litigation;
Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations, the parties hereby
agree .to the following terms and provisions:
1. Recitals. The above stated Recitals are restated and incorporated herein as if stated in
full.
2. Definitions. The following words or terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them:
"Attorneys" shall mean the law firm Holland and Knight LLC, including Jack Siegel, lain
Johnston and such other attorneys of the law firm. "Attorneys" shall also mean any other
attorney appointed by a court to be a class counsel for the any of the defendant sub-
classes or the defendant class.
"Attorneys Fees" shall mean the fees billed by the Attorneys.
C:\Win2kProfi~es\VLowe\Local SettingstTemporary Interne\ Files\OLKC\Skokie IMF Agreement - Final.doc
"Defense of the Litigation" shall mean all efforts by the Attorneys to defend against the
allegations made by a plaintiff, including but not limited to presentation of defenses on
legal issues and damages, affirmative defenses, counter claims or set-offs.
"Municipality" or "Municipalities" shall mean a municipality that is a defendant in the
Litigation and a party to this Agreement, or in the plural, collectively all municipalities
that are parties to this Agreement.
"Shared Costs" means the costs incurred in the Defense of the Litigation that the
Municipalities have agreed to share and as defined in paragraph 3 below and limited in
paragraph 4.
Shared Costs. The Municipalities will jointly share all costs and expenses associated
with the Defense of the Litigation, including but limited to Attorney's Fees, out of pocket
expenses incurred by the Attorneys, cost advances made by the Attorneys, paralegal
expenses, court costs, court reporter and transcript expenses, expert fees and
expenses and any and ail expenses incurred in the Defense of the Litigation (hereinafter
referred to as the "Shared Costs").
4. Excluded Costs. Shared Costs does not include the following costs and expenses:
A. Fees billed by attorneys other than attorneys appointed as class counsel, or a sub-
class counsel, by a court;
B. Salaries of employees or other compensation paid to agents of a municipality that
may expend time or effort on behalf of the Defense of the Litigation; or
C. Any cost or expense associated with any lawsuit or legal proceeding other than the
Litigation.
5. Governance. A Committee of Municipalities shall have the primary responsibility for
providing guidance to the Attorneys and for communicating with the parties to this
Agreement. The Committee shall be comprised of representatives of Municipalities and
a representative from each Council of Government (herein referred to as "COG") that is
a party to this Agreement. Each COG shall designate two representatives of
Municipalities that are members of the respective COG to serve on the Committee. In
the event two or less COGs are parties to this Agreement, then each COG will designate
three representatives of Municipalities. Representation on the COmmittee of parties that
are not a member of a COG shall be determined by the Committee.
6. Committee of Municipalities. The Committee of Municipalities shall review ail invoices or
bills submitted in relation to the Shared Costs and approve them for payment. The
Committee may reject any invoice or bill that it determines is not appropriate or correct.
The Committee shall establish a methodology for assessing and collecting each
Municipalities' share of the Shared Costs. The methodology for assessing the Shared
Costs shall be on a per capita basis utilizing the Municipalities' population. Each COG
shall have the responsibility of communicating and collecting the assessments from the
MunicipaIities that are members the respective COG.
7. Payment. Each Municipality shall make a payment for Shared Costs in amount equal to
its population times twenty-five cents (population x $.25). Such other payments shall be
ade at the time, and in the amounts, as determined by the Committee of
Municipalities. At such time as ail Litigation is ended, any funds remaining Shall be
returned to the Municipalities on a per capita basis. Nothing in this Agreement precludes
a Municipality from withdrawing from this Agreement, however, the withdrawing
Municipality shall not be entitled to withdraw any of the initial amount paid pursuant to
the first sentence of this paragraph.
COG. Any and all expenses incurred by a COG Shall be borne solely by the respective
COG and shall not be considered Shared Costs, except the Committee of Municipalities
may determine that the COG should be reimbursed for the expense. No COG shall be
obligated for Shared Costs and no assessment shall be made to a COG.
9. Counterpart. It is contemplated that this Agreement will be executed through the use of
counterparts and such execution is authorized.
In Witness whereof, the below named Municipality/COG, agrees to be a party to the
Agreement for the Sharing of Litigation Expenses and the authorized municipal/COG
officials have duly executed and affixed their signatures hereto.
VILLAGE O~ MOUNT PROSPECT
10~ S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056-3266
Na.,m~nicipalitY o,~/.
'T~-" SignatuCe of Official
Print Name of Official
Title
By:
Signature of Official
Print Name
Title
Date
Date
Population: ~,~Lo~ X $0.25 per capita = $ Iq, 0(P~ (contribution)