HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. New Business 03/19/2013Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER 3 WV
FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '�L . -11,11,11,
DATE: MARCH 7, 2013
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE NO. 54811 / CONDITIONAL UM
VARIATIONS / FOUNDERS ROW / 1-17 S. EMERSON STREET
The Petitioner, Compass Real Estate Services LLC, is requesting an extension of the zoning approvals
granted by the Village Board in 2005 for the Planned Unit Development known as Founders Row, The
first building is constructed and consists of two (2) occupied units, The Petitioner is currently
remodeling the remaining five (5) units in the first building for occupancy, The Petitioner would like to
complete the rest of the project by constructing the second building and related improvements as per
the original PUD plans, Therefore, the Petitioner is seeking approval to renew the zoning requests.
Attached is a letter from the Petitioner requesting an extension of the PUD.
Please forward this memorandum and attached letter to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their March 1 9 "' meeting, The Village Board would need to approve an Amendment to
Ordinance #5481 to extend the Conditional Use for a PUD and Variations granted until December 31,
2014. , Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
William , Cooney, Jr, AICP
�\vj'iwhi hcd$4 &' 70 (`()N[M�J'&'Z Nle 030713.dm-
LI Mg 4 1 IVAN I
3/07/2013
William Cooney, Director of Community Development
XM�M
As per our earlier conversations, I would like to formally request an extension to
the approved Conditional Use Permit for the Planned Unit Development for the
Founders Row townho'mes project located at 1 S. Emerson - 1 7 S. Emerson,
Mount Prospect, 111- as granted under Ordinance No. 5481.
I
This Ordinance was originally granted' on 03/01/2005. The previous developer
was unable to complete the project. Compass Real Estate Services LLC took
over the project and since was able to have the updated architectural and
engineering plans completed and submitted for the new building permit.
I would like to point out that there are no changes to the original plans that were
approved under the Ordinance (except as required by the updated building
codes). We also intend to comply with all the conditions of the approval.
I would like to thank you for all of your help in getting this project completed.
6-rl=- FJ
[6of Davyd6i
dent
ORDINANCE NO. 5481
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS AND A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
1 -17 SOUTH EMERSON STREET (FOUNDERS ROW)
Passed and approved by
the President and Board of Trustees
the 1 St day of March, 2005
Published in pamphlet form by
authority of the corporate
authorities of the Village of
Mount Prospect, Illinois,
the 2 nd day of March, 2005
VWi
2/10/05
3/2/05
jc
ORDINANCE NO. 5481
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1 -17 SOUTH EMERSON STREET (FOUNDERS' ROW)
WHEREAS, Founders Row LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner ") has filed a petition
for Variations and a Conditional Use Permit in the nature of a Planned Unit Development
with respect to property located at 1 -17 South Emerson Street, (hereinafter referred to as
the "Subject Property ") and legally described as follows:
Lots 20, 21, and 22 in Block 5 in Busse and Wille's Resubdivision in Mount Prospect
of the West Quarter of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL. Also, Lot 1 in Mount Prospect State Bank
Resubdivision No. 3, a resubdivision of Lots 14 to 19 in Block 5 in Busse and Wille's
Resubdivision in Mount Prospect in the West Quarter of Section 12, Township 41
North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
Property Index Numbers: 08 -12- 104 - 001 -0000
08 -12- 104- 002 -0000
08 -12- 104- 003 -0000
08 -12- 104- 021 -0000;
Me
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit fora Planned Unit Development
for a fourteen (14) unit rowhome development, as provided in Section 14.502 of the Village
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks Variations from the Village Zoning Code to allow building
heights in excess of thirty -feet (30') and garage heights in excess of twelve feet (12'), as
provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use and Variation
being the subject of PZ -02 -05 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 27 day of January, 2005, pursuant to proper legal notice having
been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 12 day of January, 2005;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and positive
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the requests being
the subject of PZ- 02 -05; and
1 -17 S. Emerson Street
Page 2/4
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit and
Variations would be in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit for a Planned Unit Development for a fourteen
(14) unit rowhome development, as provided in Section 14.502 of the Village Code; and
SECTION THREE The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant Variations from the Village Zoning Code to allow building heights in excess
of thirty -feet (30') and garage heights in excess of twelve -feet (12') for each rowhome unit,
as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code; and
SECTION FOUR Prior to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use
permit and Variations, the following conditions and /or written documentation shall be
fulfilled:
A. The Petitioner shall preserve as many of the existing trees as possible;
B. The Petitioner shall provide at least 20% of the required amount of storm water
detention;
C. The Petitioner shall work with the residents adjacent to the site to resolve any
screening /fence issues that include but are not limited to the style of fence and
who will maintain the fence;
D. The Petitioner shall submit a revised site plan that reflects:
1. The 5.5' Emerson Street right -of -way dedication and the 7' easement along
Central Road;
2. A 24' wide, right -in /right -out only Central Road curb cut that is striped and
signed accordingly;
3. Modifications to the east lot line and private drive that eliminates conflicts
with existing utilities, and creates the necessary turning radius to
accommodate a garbage truck;
1 -17 S. Emerson Street
Page 3/4
E. The Petitioner shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes additional trees
throughout the development, identifies the screening material along the east lot line,
and includes the adopted Village's Streetscape Program;
F. The Petitioner shall submit revised elevations that reflect the building materials
presented to the Village Board as part of the RFP process in addition to a material
board;
G. The Petitioner shall submit a lighting plan for the site for Staff review and approval;
H. Prior to obtaining the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Petitioner shall submit
homeowner's association documents for Staff review and approval that include
provisions for having snow removed and deposited off -site;
I. The Petitioner's Building Permit plans shall include:
a. Signs posted in the private drive that parking is prohibited.
b. A two -hour fire separation between the garage units that abut each other.
c. A one -hour fire separation between each garage building.
d. Each unit shall be protected by sprinklers and constructed in accordance
with our adopted codes.
e. A fire hydrant installed along Central Road, location to be determined per the
Fire Chief;
J. Develop the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements,
including, but not limited to, Fire Prevention Code regulations, lighting regulations,
Sign Code regulations, and building regulations.
K. Prior to obtaining the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Petitioner shall submit a plat
of subdivision that reflects the required 5.5' dedication along Emerson Street and
the 7' easement along Central Road.
L. Provisions shall be made to allow the private drive to be extended south to Busse
Avenue at such time as the property to the south is developed as a park.
SECTION FIVE The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified
copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
1 -17 S. Emerson Street
Page 4/4
SECTION SIX This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel, Farley
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
PASSED and APPROVED this 1 day of March, 2005.
_... —
Village President
ATTEST:
4 "'tj J'k' xe�V'�
Velm W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:1CLK01fi1es\WIN10RDINANCIC USE VAR 7 -17 S Emerson, FoundersRow,FebMdoc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5481, GRANTING VARIATIONS AND A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 — 17 SOUTH
EMERSON STREET (FOUNDERS ROW), TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR THE FOUNDERS ROW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois did adopt
Ordinance No. 5481, entitled "An Ordinance Granting Variations and a Conditional Use Permit in the Nature
of a Planned Unit Development for Property Located at 1 -17 South Emerson Street (Founders Row)" at their
regular meeting on March 1, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Compass Real Estate Services LLC, is the owner of certain of the property
within the Planned Unit Development, which was granted by Ordinance No. 5481, known as Founders Row
( "Founders Row Planned Unit Development "); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14.504(F) of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance, the
Founders Row Planned Unit Development is subject to revocation as construction has exceeded five (5)
years; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner plans to complete the Founders Row Planned Unit Development and is
requesting to extend the effective date of the conditional use permit for that Planned Unit Development, so
as to construct the second building and related improvements in accordance with the original Planned Unit
Development plans; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees find that it is in the best interests of the Village to grant the
Petitioner's request to extend the effective date of the conditional use permit for the Founders Row
Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR
HOME RULE POWERS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 5481 is hereby amended to extend the effective date of the conditional use
permit for the Founders Row Planned Unit Development to December 31, 2014, such that construction shall
start on or before that date.
SECTION THREE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval
and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of March, 2013.
ATTEST:
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
Mount • • '" ct Public Works • . ..
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 2013
SUBJECT: FEBRUARY TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING
GROVE DRIVE PARKING STUDY
The Transportation Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to prohibit parking at all times
along the north side of Grove Drive for the westernmost 200' of the street.
Grove Drive is a local residential street south of Golf Road and west of Busse Road. It experiences
approximately 700 vehicles per day and primarily serves abutting multi - family housing complexes.
Parking is currently prohibited at all times along the south and east sides of the street.
A majority of Grove Drive is a Village- standard 31' wide. However, the border between Mount Prospect
and Arlington Heights is such that the street tapers to only 21' wide at the western end of Grove Drive.
Nearby residents have recently complained that on- street parking along this tapered section makes it
difficult to access the multi - family complexes. It may also be difficult for emergency vehicles to access
the multi - family housing complexes when vehicles are parked along the tapered portion of the street.
The Engineering Division performed a traffic study and did observe on- street parking as described by the
complainants, primarily in the evening hours. As part of the study, surveys were sent to nearby
properties soliciting their input on this issue. All, including one from the property management
company at the Mansions of Mountshire, have no issues with prohibiting parking along the north side of
Grove Drive for the westernmost 200' of the street.
This issue was presented at the February 11, 2013 Transportation Safety Commission Meeting. No one
was in the audience to speak on the issue. After a brief discussion, the Commission, including a
representative from the Fire Department, supported the Engineering Division's recommendation.
By a vote of 7 -0, the Transportation Safety Commission recommends the following
change to the Village Code:
• Enact an ordinance that prohibits parking at all times along the north side of
Grove Drive for the westernmost 200' of the street. (Section 18.2006)
page 1 of 2
February Transportation Safety Commission Meeting
February 27, 2013
Please include this item on the March 19 Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the
Transportation Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting as well as a location map for your
reference.
Matthew P. Lawrie
Attachments
c: Director of Public Works Sean Dorsey
Deputy Director of Public Works Jason Leib
Village Engineer Jeff Wulbecker
Village Clerk Lisa Angell
h: � engineering � traffic Isafety_ commission�recommendations�TSC- februaryl3rec.docx
page 2 of 2
Ik Mount Prospect
Director
Sean P. Dorsey
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 -2229
MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION
nadFT
CALL TO ORDER
Deputy Director
Jason H. Leib
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Transportation Safety Commission was called to order at
7:05 p.m. on Monday, February 11, 2013.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: John Keane
Robert Fisher
Justin Kuehlthau
Carol Tortorello
Bob Smith
Henry Dawson
Paul Bures
Matt Lawrie
Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Police Department Representative
Fire Department Representative
Public Works Representative
Traffic Engineer —Staff Liaison
Absent: Chuck Bencic Commissioner
Angel Campos Commissioner
Others in Attendance: See attached attendance sheet
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Fisher, seconded by Commissioner Tortorello, moved to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of the Transportation Safety Commission held on September 10, 2012. The minutes
were approved by a vote of 7 -0.
CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
There was no one in attendance that spoke on an issue not on the agenda.
TSC Meeting Page 1 of 8 February 11, 2013
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business to discuss.
NEW BUSINESS
A. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY & WILLE STREET PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
1) Background Information
During summer weekends, both the Lions Club sponsored Farmers Market and Downtown
Merchants Association sponsored Car Show occupy the west commuter lot to host their events.
Many visitors park on the north side of Northwest Highway and cross the roadway at Wille
Street. There is currently no marked crosswalk or signs at the intersection. The Police
Department with the assistance of the Lions Club and Downtown Merchants Association
establish a temporary crosswalk using cones, signs and a dolly with flashing lights. The Lions
Club has requested of the Village a meeting to discuss the possibility of a permanent marked
crosswalk at the intersection.
Current Layout
1. Northwest Highway is five lanes and approximately 60' wide (back -of- curb to back -of- curb).
2. Wille Street terminates at Northwest Highway and is approximately 40' wide (back -of -curb
to back -of- curb). There is a left -turn lane, right -turn lane & inbound lane at Northwest
Highway.
3. Opposite Wille Street is a driveway to the Metra commuter parking lot. It allows full access
to and from Northwest Highway. The parking lot has approximately 140 spaces.
4. The north side of Northwest Highway west of Wille Street has a small shopping center with
approximately 35 spaces in a private parking lot.
5. There are angled on- street parking spaces along Busse Avenue and Wille Street.
6. There is a Village -owned parking lot on the north side of Northwest Highway east of Wille
Street with approximately 50 spaces.
7. There are no marked crosswalk or sidewalk ramps across Northwest Highway at Wille
Street. There is, however, a marked crosswalk across Wille Street.
8. There are marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals one block to the east at Northwest
Highway and Main Street (Route 83).
Current Traffic Conditions
1. On Saturday evenings from mid -May to September there is a car show in the Metra
commuter parking lot.
2. On Sundays from B:OOAM — 1:OOPM from June to October the Farmers Market occupies the
Metra commuter parking lot.
3. Both of these events generates a lot of people that park their vehicles on the north side of
Northwest Highway and walk across the street at Wille Street. The Lions Club places orange
cones across Northwest Highway to serve as a crosswalk. The Police Departments sets up a
portable dolly that flashes red and blue lights to caution motorists.
4. At all other times there is very little pedestrian activity at this intersection.
2) Discussion Points
1. Northwest Highway is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (I DOT).
Any proposed work will require their approval.
TSC Meeting Page 2 of 8 February 11, 2013
2. A preliminary drawing showing a marked crosswalk across Northwest Highway has been
sent to IDOT for comment.
3. A pedestrian count survey has not been performed at the intersection. It is recommended
that one be done when the car shows and Farmers Market returns later this spring. IDOT
will most likely require one before consideration of a marked crosswalk.
4. IDOT is planning to resurface Northwest Highway perhaps as soon as 2014. Pedestrian
crossing improvements could possibly be incorporated into the project.
5. It is unclear how the area along the north side of Northwest Highway between Wille Street
and Main Street will be redeveloped. Redevelopment may impact the need for or use of a
marked crosswalk at Wille Street. There is not a timetable for redevelopment of this area.
6. The Police Department does not currently assign an officer during the car shows or Farmers
Market to assist pedestrians across Northwest Highway. This may be difficult to do because
of budget constraints. Is the Lions Club or another organization willing to pay for an officer
or crossing guard during these times?
7. The need for a marked crosswalk is isolated to two specific time periods. And the Police
Department provides resources to highlight the crossing of pedestrians and caution
motorists during these time periods. Permanent signs and a marked crosswalk without the
presence of the Police Department during these events may not provide the desired safety
level as motorists are not accustomed to seeing pedestrians cross at this location most
times of the year. As a result, motorists may not be as attentive to pedestrians crossing the
street compared to a location that experiences pedestrians on a consistent basis.
Therefore, is there benefit /justification to install a marked crosswalk?
8. In addition to assigning a police officer or crossing guard during the busiest times and
installing a marked crosswalk at the intersection, the Lions Club has also suggested placing
temporary stop signs at the crossing during the car shows and Farmers Market. This is not
recommended because of its potential impact on traffic along Northwest Highway. Also,
stop signs may not be expected by motorists creating a false sense of security for
pedestrians.
3) Recommendation
The Engineering Division neither supports nor opposes pedestrian crossing improvements at
Northwest Highway and Wille Street at this time. Police Department resources today assist in
providing a high level of safety during the times when pedestrians cross the street. At all other
times there is very little pedestrian activity to warrant a marked crosswalk.
It is recommended the Engineering Division perform a pedestrian count survey this spring. It is
further recommended that they discuss the acceptability of a marked crosswalk with IDOT and
their schedule to resurface Northwest Highway. Finally, it is recommended the Engineering
Division discuss with the Planning Division the status of redevelopment plans for the area to
determine the long -term need for a marked crosswalk at Wille Street. This issue can be
discussed again later this fall /winter once additional information has been gathered.
4) Discussion
Traffic Engineer Lawrie asked those representing the Lions Club to share a little bit about the
Farmers Market and their concerns with pedestrian safety.
Mike Giblin and Fred Steinmiller, representing the Lions Club, provided the Commission with
some history of the Farmers Market and its current operations. The Farmers Market occupies
the west commuter lot on Sunday mornings between June and October, and typically draws
2000 to 3000 visitors each week. The Police Department provides a dolly on Northwest Highway
TSC Meeting Page 3 of 8 February 11, 2013
that flashes red and blue lights. The Lions Club provides signs and orange cones to simulate a
crosswalk at Wille Street.
Mr. Giblin expressed concern that the Lions Club could be held liable in the event of an accident
because of their involvement with placing signs and cones in the roadway. They could consider
hiring a police officer to serve as a crossing guard but this would reduce the money used to help
the community.
Christy Watychowicz, representing the Downtown Merchants Association, spoke about the Car
Show that takes place every Saturday evening in the summer. The Car Show also occupies the
west commuter lot and the Police Department provides the dolly for this event. However, there
are no cones or signs even though pedestrians cross Northwest Highway at Wille Street.
There was discussion about the Village or the Lions Club purchasing a second dolly so that there
would not be a need to charge it in between weekend events. However, it is prohibitive at this
time because of cost.
Rafael Manjarres, the owner of Crave Pizza, expressed concern for his patrons crossing
Northwest Highway without a marked crosswalk at Wille Street. He believes the intersection is
dark during the Car Show when people are crossing the street.
Steve Polit, 601 Wilshire Drive, is involved in both the Farmers Market and Car Show. He would
like to see an engineering solution to this issue because he believes the temporary solution is
ineffective. One long -term idea is to have a pedestrian overpass connecting the north side of
Northwest Highway to the businesses on Prospect Avenue. Commissioner Kuehlthau supported
this idea.
Ms. Watychowicz suggested a similar configuration to the pedestrian crossing across Northwest
Highway at Maple Street. At that location there is a marked crosswalk and a connection in the
commuter lot to the railroad platform.
Commissioner Fisher does not want the Lions Club to have to incur liability for having cones in
the roadway. He asked if community service officers could assist pedestrians cross the roadway.
He also suggested parking a drone car at the intersection to cause motorists to slow down.
Commander Smith said there are limited police and community service officers to assist on the
weekends. The Police Department has committed to placing the dolly at the two weekend
events but cannot provide a full -time presence at the intersection.
There was some discussion about the Lions Club hiring a crossing guard. Commander Smith
mentioned that because Northwest Highway is a State roadway, a crossing guard needed to be a
trained law enforcement person. Mr. Giblin said the Lions Club would consider hiring a police
officer to serve as a crossing guard.
Traffic Engineer Lawrie made a presentation on the issue and provided the Engineering
Division's recommendations. He mentioned that he had a phone conversation with IDOT after
the report was sent to the Commission. IDOT has opposed the Village's conceptual plan to
install a marked crosswalk across Northwest Highway at Wille Street for two reasons. First, the
intersection is only one block from marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals. Second,
pedestrian activity is evident at only two events throughout the year. A permanent crosswalk
may become ineffective should motorists become accustomed to not seeing pedestrians using
TSC Meeting Page 4 of 8 February 11, 2013
the crosswalk. IDOT would, however, continue to allow a temporary crosswalk as has been the
practice.
Commissioner Tortorello asked if the curb could be replaced with a handicap ramp and sidewalk
constructed to the commuter lot. There was discussion that this may interfere with the booth
layout and still may not serve wheelchairs and strollers well. Traffic Engineer Lawrie said that
IDOT would not allow any work within the right -of -way without a permit and recommended the
temporary crosswalk continue to terminate at the commuter lot driveway.
It was suggested that fluorescent yellow -green cones be used as a temporary crosswalk rather
than orange cones. Commander Smith concurred that fluorescent yellow -green cones would be
more visible at night. He also supported the idea of using the speed feedback trailer during the
Farmers Market and Car Show to slow down vehicles on Northwest Highway.
Many of the commissioners expressed an interest in having the Engineering Division this
summer perform a pedestrian count survey at the intersection. It will be important to know not
only the number of pedestrians crossing Northwest Highway during the Farmers Market and Car
Show but at other times of the week as well. This information may be useful to cause IDOT to
reconsider their position. Mr. Polit offered his recording equipment to assist in the survey if
necessary.
There was consensus to continue to dialog with [DOT about a permanent marked crosswalk in
the future. Traffic Engineer Lawrie reiterated IDOT plans to resurface Northwest Highway in the
next few years, possibly as early as 2014. He will bring this issue up again as well as the Village's
interest to improve the crossing at Maple Street.
There was continued discussion on the issue of liability. Mr. Giblin stated that he planned to
speak to the Lions Club attorney to see if they should continue to place cones and signs across
Northwest Highway during this upcoming season. Traffic Engineer Lawrie said he would speak
with the Village Attorney about the Village's involvement as well. He said there is always the
option to encourage pedestrians to only cross at the pedestrian signals one block to the east.
The issue was brought back to the Commission. Traffic Engineer Lawrie was asked to summarize
the recommended action steps based on the conversation. He recapped:
• The Lions Club will speak with their attorney about liability and their involvement with
providing a temporary crosswalk. Mr. Giblin will then contact the Village to discuss their
position
• Traffic Engineer Lawrie will discuss the subject of liability with the Village Attorney.
• The Lions Club will consider hiring a police officer to serve as a crossing guard.
• The Lions Club will consider using fluorescent yellow -green cones instead of orange cones
and installing signs in advance of the temporary crosswalk.
• The Police Department will continue to provide the dolly during the Farmers Market and Car
Show. They will also consider setting up the speed feedback trailer.
• The Engineering Division will perform a pedestrian count survey this summer.
• The Engineering Division will continue to dialog with IDOT and look for an opportunity to
install a permanent marked crosswalk in the future.
• Traffic Engineer Lawrie will bring the issue back to the Commission once the above items
have been explored.
TSC Meeting Page 5 of 8 February 11, 2013
Commissioner Tortorello made a motion to concur with the recommendations as summarized
by Traffic Engineer Lawrie. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Fisher.
The motion was approved by a vote of 7 -0.
B. GROVE DRIVE PARKING STUDY
1) Background Information
The border between Mount Prospect and Arlington Heights is such that the street tapers to only
21' wide at the western end of Grove Drive. Nearby residents have recently complained that
on- street parking along this tapered section makes it difficult to access the multi - family
complexes. Those residents and the property management company directly impacted by the
potential change to prohibit parking in the area were notified of the Transportation Safety
Commission Meeting and invited to send comments.
Current Traffic Regulations
1. Parking is prohibited along the south side of Grove Drive for its entire length.
2. Parking is prohibited between 2:OOAM and 6:OOAM on all Village streets.
Current Layout
1. Grove Drive is 31' wide (back -of -curb to back -of -curb) except the westernmost 200' where it
narrows to 21' wide (back -of -curb to back -of- curb).
2. The south curb line is a consistent straight line. The north curb line tapers because of
limited right -of -way.
3. Driveways on both sides of Grove Drive at the west end serve multi - family housing
complexes.
Current Traffic Conditions
1. On- street parking was observed at various times of the day and week.
2. Of the 13 observations, there were no vehicles parked on the street 7 times.
3. There were 4 times where there was 1 vehicle parked along the tapered portion of the
street.
4. The highest number of vehicles parked along the tapered portion of the street during an
observation was 3 vehicles.
5. No vehicles were ever observed to be parked at the end of the street, west of the driveways
to the apartment complexes.
2) Issues
1. Two -way traffic cannot be maintained with vehicles parked along the tapered portion of the
street.
2. According to the complaint, it can be difficult for motorists to pass a vehicle when it's
parked near the driveway to the Mansions of Mountshire complex.
3. It may also be difficult for emergency vehicles to access the apartment complexes when
vehicles are parked along the tapered portion of the street.
4. There are available, convenient on- street parking spaces along the north side of Grove Drive
at its widest point (31' back -of -curb to back -of- curb).
As part of the study, 7 surveys were sent to nearby properties soliciting their input onthis issue.
3 surveys (43%) were returned. All, including one from the property management company at
TSC Meeting Page 6 of 8 February 11, 2013
the Mansions of Mountshire, have no issues with prohibiting parking along the north side of
Grove Drive for the westernmost 200' of the street.
3) Recommendation
With vehicles currently allowed to park along the tapered portion of Grove Drive, it can be
difficult for motorists to leave and access the driveways to the apartment complexes. The
current situation could also be difficult for emergency vehicles. There is available on- street
parking along other sections of Grove Drive and those surveyed have not objected to the
request. Recommendation: Prohibit parking at all times along the north side of Grove Drive for
the westernmost 200' of the street.
4) Discussion
Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided background information on the subject and summarized the
recommendation to prohibit parking along the tapered portion of Grove Drive.
Commissioner Tortorello asked if it is possible to widen the street at the western end to a
standard width. Traffic Engineer Lawrie responded that because of the configuration of the
border line between Mount Prospect and Arlington Heights, it is not possible at this time.
Commissioner Fisher said he supports the recommendation to improve access for emergency
vehicles.
Commissioner Kuehlthau commented that he used to live in the area and is familiar with the
parking issues. He too supports the recommendation.
Commissioner Fisher made a motion to prohibit parking at all times along the north side of
Grove Drive for the westernmost 200' of the street. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bures.
The motion was approved by a vote of 7 -0.
COMMISSION ISSUES
Commissioner Kuehlthau inquired as to the accident history between vehicles and pedestrians at the
intersection of Emerson Street and Central Road. Commander Smith was not aware of many, if any,
accidents involving nedestrians at this intersectinn- Traffic Fnginaar I awria -.aid ha wnulrl invPCtiaata by
reviewing crash records for the intersection.
Commissioner Kuehlthau asked if any changes were going to be made to the Mount Prospect Plaza
driveway at Rand Road. Traffic Engineer Lawrie said there were no near -term plans for the intersection.
At a previous meeting, Commissioner Campos brought up a sight obstruction issue at the Dunkin Donuts
at Golf Road and Busse Road. Traffic Engineer Lawrie updated the Commission that the Village Forestry
Division has removed two large bushes within the public right -of -way which has improved the sight line
for motorists exiting the Dunkin Donuts.
Traffic Engineer Lawrie congratulated Carol Tortorello for her recent Shining Star award.
TSC Meeting Page 7 of 8 February 11, 2013
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to discuss, the Transportation Safety Commission voted 7 -0 to adjourn at 9:18
p.m. upon the motion of Commissioner Fisher. Commissioner Kuehlthau seconded the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
Matthew P. Lawrie, P.E. }
Traffic Engineer
h:\ engi nee ring\ traffic\ safety_ commission \recs &mins \TSC- february 13min.docx
TSC Meeting Page 8 of 8 February 11, 2013
VILLAGE O F M O UN T PR O SPE C T
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING
ATTENDANCE SHEET
February 11, 2013
NAME
Anne FCc.
PHONE NUMBER
Alk(;J4
9e� pdl�
� p, S. (2,,14 a
wf
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED
" TRAFFIC" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENTAND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF
THEIR HOME RULE POWERS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2006, "SCHEDULE VI —NO PARKING ANYTIME"
of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further
amended by adding the following:
" Name of Street Side of Street Description
Grove Drive North for the westernmost
200' of the street."
SECTION TWO That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of March, 2013.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
KLEIN, THORPE & JENKINS, LTD.
Attorneys at Law
20 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 1660
Chicago, Illinois 606062903
T 312 984 6400 F 312 984 6444
DO 312 984 6420
emhill9ktjlaw.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Janonis, Village Manager
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr.
DATE: February 11, 2013
RE: Completion Bond Requirements
15010 S. Ravinia Avenue, Ste 10
Orland Park, Illinois 60462 -5353
T 708 349 3988 F 708 3491506
www.ktjlaw.com
About four years ago, we amended the Subdivision Code with respect to completion
bond requirements. Since that time there have been changes in the state law with respect to
such bonds, changes in our own practices and some confusion in how the bonds set forth in
Chapter 15 were to be applied. This ordinance is an attempt to make our Code consistent
with statutes, our current practice and to more clearly inform developers of their
responsibilities with respect to these guarantees.
The proposed new ordinance clearly divides the required guarantees into three
categories: (1) Completion Guarantees; (2) Maintenance Guarantees; and (3) Construction
Nuisance Abatement Deposits.
Consistent with state law, which pre -empts home rule authority in this case, we are
giving developers the opportunity to post as a completion guarantee, either cash, letter of
credit or surety bond in the amount of 115% of the estimated cost of the public improvements.
Based on experience and solely for the purpose of the guarantee, we now deem all
stormwater drainage improvements to be "public improvements" even if the stormwater
structures are to be privately maintained.
302930_1
The proposed new ordinance, while allowing the developer (at the discretion of the
Village) to simply convert the completion guarantee into a maintenance guarantee, clearly
separates the two.
The proposed new ordinance also clearly delineates the nuisance abatement
guarantee from the other two. The wording of the current ordinance has caused some
confusion with respect to the possible uses for the nuisance abatement guarantee. The
current ordinance provides that the nuisance abatement deposit may be released by "either"
the Public Works Director or the Community Development Director. The proposed ordinance
requires a sign -off by "both" of them.
It is hoped that the new language will also clear up any confusion with respect to the
difference in meaning of the terms "bond" and "guarantee ". The proposed ordinance uses the
term "bond" only to mean a surety bond in contradistinction to a cash escrow or a letter of
credit.
302930_1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15
"SUBDIVISION, DEVELOPMENT AND SITE IMPROVEMENT PROCEDURES"
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION 1: Section 15.802 entitled "Construction Guarantees and Fees" of
Article VIII "Fees, Guarantees and Agreements" of Chapter 15 "Subdivision,
Development and Site Improvement Procedures" of the Mount Prospect Village Code
shall be amended by deleting Section 15.802 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof
the following new Section 15.802 as follows:
15.802: CONSTRUCTION GUARANTEES AND FEES:
Prior to the issuance of any permits and commencement of any construction
requiring the installation of public improvements, a private developer shall provide the
following guarantees (for purposes of this Section 15.802, Public Improvements shall
include storm water management structures even if privately owned):
A. Public Improvement Completion Guarantee ( "Completion Guarantee ").
Basis: The Public Improvement Guarantee shall be based on an
engineer's estimate as approved by the Village.
2. Amount Of Completion Guarantee: The amount of a completion
guarantee shall be as set forth in appendix A, division I of this
code.
3. Acceptable Forms of Guarantee:
a. The following forms of guarantee (at the election of
the developer) are acceptable for assuring installation of public
improvements integral to the development:
Cash Escrow: Cash deposit by certified or cashier's
check. No interest shall be earned on cash deposits;
M
301478_5
Letter Of Credit: An irrevocable, commercial
letter of credit in a form acceptable to the village; or
iii. Bond: The statutory form of bond security
assuring that the project will be completed according
to the conditions of the approved permit.
b. Covenant to Complete at Future Date: In the event
that the village determines, in its sole discretion, that current
conditions make the completion of specific public improvements
impractical, a covenant may be executed and recorded to assure
the completion of the improvements. Such a covenant shall provide
for the filing of a lien against the property in the event of
nonperformance and shall be in a form acceptable to the village.
301478_5
4. Drawdown and Acceptance: If the completion guarantee is by cash
deposit or letter of credit; the guarantee shall provide that no
payments shall be made from the guarantee without the written
consent of the director of public works and the director of
community development. It shall further provide that drawdowns
may be permitted only up to fifty percent (50 %) of the cost of each
properly installed item. No more than fifty percent (50 %) of the
completion guarantee may be disbursed or reduced until the
improvements have been completed and accepted by the village.
Approval of payments for the installation of improvements shall not
constitute acceptance of such improvements.
5. Time Limit: Each guarantee shall be issued for a period of two (2)
years and shall state that all construction is to be completed within
the life of the permit.
6. Failure to Complete: In the event that the construction is not
completed in accordance with village requirements, the village may
take any and all necessary steps with respect to the guarantee to
complete the construction. No further permits or certificates of
occupancy will be issued for the site until the entire project is
complete.
7. Renewal: In the event that the public improvements have not been
accepted by the village within sixty (60) days of the expiration of the
completion guarantee (whether or not the underlying permit has
been extended); then at the village's option, the completion
guarantee may be renewed. The director of public works and /or
director of community development will determine, from an
2
t.
acceptable construction cost index, an average yearly increase in
the construction cost over the duration of the guarantee. The
amount of the new construction guarantee shall be increased from
its face value (taken 60 days prior to expiration) by two (2) times
the average yearly increase in construction cost.
8. Refund: The surety bond or any amount remaining on a letter of
credit or in a cash deposit shall be returned to the applicant on the
village's acceptance of the improvements; (or) in the discretion of
the village, the surety bond, letter of credit or cash deposit may be
converted to a maintenance guarantee as set forth in (B) below.
9. Applicability: The requirements for completion guarantees set forth
above shall apply to all types of developments, regardless of use or
ownership.
B. Maintenance Guarantee:
Upon acceptance of the improvements by the village, the developer
shall post a maintenance guarantee in one of the forms set forth in
(A)3 above in the amount set forth in appendix A, division I of the
village code ( "Maintenance Guarantee ") as a guarantee against the
following:
a. Any defect in material or workmanship furnished for
such improvements.
b. Any damage to the improvements.
2. The Maintenance Guarantee shall be returned two (2) years after
its posting or the village's acceptance of the improvements,
whichever is later.
C. Construction Nuisance Abatement Deposit: ( "CNAD "). In addition to the
Completion Guarantee; the applicant shall also make a cash deposit with the village for
the abatement of nuisances during construction, in accordance with the following:
Amount: The amount of the CNAD shall be as set forth in appendix
A, division I of this code.
2. Use of Deposit:
a. The deposit may be used to abate any nuisance, as
defined by the village code, arising out of or caused by the work
and /or development and shall include, but be not limited to,
3014785 3
cleaning construction debris off public streets, parkway restoration
and securing the site.
b. Except in matters of immediate threat to persons or
property; no expenditure of the CNAD may be made until four (4)
hours after the director of public works or director of community
development has demanded that the applicant abate the nuisance.
C. Following any drawdown of the CNAD, all work on the
site shall be stopped until the CNAD is replenished.
d. The developer may request a refund of the CNAD
ninety (90) days after the issuance of the final certificate of
occupancy.
D. Development Review Fees: Development review fees shall be levied
against the development to cover the cost of reviewing engineering plans and
construction inspections. This fee shall be as set forth in appendix A, division II of this
code. One -third ( of this fee shall be applied to engineering plan review costs and
two- thirds ( to construction inspection costs. (Ord. 5253, 5 -21 -2002)
SECTION 2: Section 15.809 entitled "Surety Bond" of Article VIII "Fees,
Guarantees and Agreements" of Chapter 15 "Subdivision, Development and Site
Improvement Procedures" of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended by
deleting Section 15.809 in its entirety.
SECTION 3: Section 15.802 entitled "Construction Guarantees and Fees" of
Appendix A, Division II "Fees, Rates and Taxes" of the Mount Prospect Village Code
shall be amended by deleting Section 15.802 (C) in its entirety.
SECTION 4: Section 15.802 entitled "Construction Guarantees and Fees" of
Appendix A, Division I "Bonds, Salaries, Insurance and Miscellaneous" of the Mount
Prospect Village Code shall be amended by deleting Section 15.802 in its entirety and
inserting in lieu thereof the following new Section 15.802 of Appendix A, Division I to be
and read as follows.
3014785 4
15.802: CONSTRUCTION GUARANTEES AND FEES:
A. 2. Amount of Guarantee: 115% of the total cost of public
improvements, including, but not limited to, engineering, inspection, materials and labor
as determined by the village engineer.
B. 1. Maintenance Guarantee: 10% of the actual cost of improvements
C. 1. Construction Nuisance Abatement Deposit:
Estimated Cost of Project
0-$25,000
25,000 — 250,000
250,000 — 1,000,000
1,000,000 and above
CNAD Amount
$2,000
$2,000 or 6% whichever is more
$15,000 or 5% whichever is more
$50,000 or 3% whichever is more up to
$100,000
SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
day of
2013
Irvana Wilks, Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk
3014785 5
La =9
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE: MARCH 13, 2013
SUBJECT: 2013 BUDGET AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
PURPOSE:
Present a recommendation that the annual budget be amended for fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2013 and ending December 31, 2013.
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance 6046, adopted December 18, 2012, established the annual budget for the
year ending December 31, 2013.
DISCUSSION:
Each year the Village prepares two or more budget amendments impacting revenues
and /or expenses to the current year's budget. Budget amendments are done to better
manage the annual budget by accounting for carry -over items or material variations in
revenues and /or expenditures. Many times these variations are a result of fluctuations in
the economy affecting revenues (either positively or negatively), extraordinary or
unanticipated charges for expenditures or the timing of projects causing work to occur
over different fiscal periods. This amendment adjusts original budget figures to reflect
carry -over projects from the prior year.
A proposed ordinance amending the 2013 Annual Budget is attached for the Board's
consideration. In total, we are increasing the budget for revenues by $170,206 and
expenditures by $5,870,302. We again have limited the amount of carryover budget
items in the General Fund. Amendments in other Funds are primarily for expenditures
related to capital projects for building and infrastructure improvements, water and sewer
system improvements and grant programs.
The budget for CDBG revenues was increased $170,206 to cover various block grant
programs. There were several notable adjustments made to expenditure accounts.
Bonds totaling $2.5 million were issued in December 2012 to fund various flood control
projects identified in the Comprehensive Flood Study. Projects to be completed using
bond proceeds include work on the Hatlen Heights storm and sanitary sewer system,
Lonquist combined and sanitary sewer system, and Lawrence Lane and Golfview
Estates stormwater Improvements. No budget was established for these items initially,
so accounts will be created and funded to move forward with the projects.
2013 Budget Amendment #1
March 13, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Water projects being carried over include the automatic meter reading devices for
commercial /industrial accounts totaling $965,000 and lift station improvements totaling
$277,000. Street construction projects that were carried over include Kensington Road
Improvements at $161,000. Other notable projects carried over into 2013 include police
squad conversion costs and vehicle purchases for Public Works totaling $360,900, roof
and HVAC repairs for the PW and Public Safety buildings of $357,500 and various
CDBG program expenses totaling $170,206.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the
Annual Budget.
Village Board adopt the proposed ordinance amending the 2013
David O. Erb
Finance Director
DOE/
Copy: Finance Commission
Department Directors
C: \Documents and Settings \djarosz \Local Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content.Outlook \W7C5BMPD \Board Memo Amendment #1 - March 2013 - revised.docx
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL
BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2013
AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2013
PASSED AND APPROVED BY
THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
the day of ' 201 3 1
Published in pamphlet form by
authority of the corporate authorities
of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
the _ day of -1.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL
BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2013
AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2013
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
passed and approved Ordinance No. 2342 which sets the finances of the Village under the
"Budget Officer System "; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid Ordinance and the Statutes of the State of Illinois
an annual budget for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 2013 and ending December
31, 2013 was adopted through the passage of Ordinance No. 6046 approved by the
Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect on December 18, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
further reviewed certain additions and changes to the aforesaid budget for the fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2013 and ending December 31, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
believe the changes, as specified on the attached January 1, 2013 through December 31,
2013 Budget Amendment No. 1 to be in the best interest of the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the Village has now revised the revenue projections or has reserves in each
of the Funds in which the budget is being increased adequate in amount to cover the
budget changes reflected in Budget Amendment Number One, attached hereto.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE That the fiscal year budget for January 1, 2013 through December 31,
2013 for the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby amended, as detailed on Budget
Amendment No. 1 attached hereto.
SECTION TWO That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAPES:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 2013.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Budget Amendment No. 1
Fiscal Year January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013
Expenditures
Fund /Account Number
001 General Fund
001.20.25.00.0.000.590.001
001.40.41.00.0.000.562.001
001.40.42.00.0.000.562.001
Account Description
Current
Budget
Amount
Increase
(Decrease)
Amended
Budget
Amount
-
850
850
5,000
2,000
7,000
8,000
8,000
16,000
13,000
10,850
23,850
44, 308, 998
-
44, 308, 998
44, 321, 998
10,850
44, 332, 848
-
14,455
14,455
25,000
5,000
30,000
100,000
161,000
261,000
115,500
100,000
215,500
95,000
98,000
193,000
-
100,000
100,000
300,000
157,500
457,500
635,500
635,955
1,271,455
1,039,247
-
1,039,247
1
635,955
2,310,702
1,217,500
70,350
1,287,850
1,217,500
70,350
1,287,850
278,000
-
278,000
1
70,350
1,565,850
-
1,610,000
1,610,000
-
105,000
105,000
-
200,000
200,000
-
135,000
135,000
-
50,000
50,000
-
400,000
400,000
70,000
98,800
168,800
70,000
2,598,800
2,668,800
687,150
-
687,150
757,150
2,598,800
3,355,950
50,000
66,000
116,000
50,000
66,000
116,000
1,714,366
-
1,714,366
1
66,000
1,830,366
All other General Fund accounts
Total General Fund
020 Capital Improvement Fund
020.20.90.00.1.709.665.075
020.80.90.00.0.705.679.026
020.80.90.00.1.704.678.019
020.80.90.00.1.706.649.003
020.80.90.00.1.706.651.001
020.80.90.00.1.706.651.002
020.80.90.00.1.706.651.010
Telephone - Cellular
Document Imaging
Document Imaging
Board Room Cameras
NWHWY -MP Rd Bike Path
Kensington Road Improv
PW Roof Repair
Other Public Buildings
Salt Storage Building
Repl HVAC -Pub Bldgs
All other Capital Improvement Fund accounts
Total Capital Improvement Fund
023 Street Improvement Construction Fund
023.80.90.00.0.705.678.003 Resurfacing -SC Fund
All other Street Improvement Construction Fund accounts
Total Street Improvement Construction Fund
024 Flood Control Construct
024.80.90.00.0.702.677.011
024.80.90.00.0.702.677.012
024.80.90.00.0.702.677.013
024.80.90.00.0.702.677.014
024.80.90.00.0.702.677.015
024.80.90.00.0.702.677.016
024.80.90.00.1.702.677.003
ion Fund
Hatlen Heights Storm Sewer
Hatlen Heights Sanitary Swr
Lonnquist Combined Sewer Imp
Lonnquist Storm Sewer Impr
Lawrence Lane Storm Sewer
Golfview Estates Stormwater
Levee 37
All other Flood Control Construction Fund accounts
Total Flood Control Construction Fund
041 Motor Fuel Tax Fund
041.80.90.00.0.704.676.003 Traffic Signal Repl
All other Motor Fuel Tax Fund accounts
Total Motor Fuel Tax Fund
2
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Budget Amendment No. 1
Fiscal Year January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013
Expenditures
3
Current
Amended
Budget
Increase
Budget
Fund /Account Number Account Description
Amount
(Decrease)
Amount
042 Cmmty Development Block Grant
042.40.41.00.0.154.572.039 Rehab. Admin.
20,000
10,206
30,206
042.40.41.00.0.154.636.012 Single Family Rehab
94,000
160,000
254,000
114,000
170,206
284,206
All other Cmmty Development Block Grant accounts
176,203
-
176,203
Total Cmmty Development Block Grant
290,203
170,206
460,409
047 Justice Assistance Grant Fund
047.60.90.00.1.709.657.005 Dig Surveillance Eqpt
-
836
836
-
836
836
All other Justice Assistance Grant Fund accounts
-
-
-
Total Justice Assistance Grant Fund
-
836
836
050 Water and Sewer Fund
050.80.90.00.1.700.665.001 AMR System
290,000
965,000
1,255,000
050.80.90.00.1.700.666.002 Emerg Gen/Wells
-
345,720
345,720
050.80.90.00.1.700.671.005 Deep Well Rehab
-
196,685
196,685
050.80.90.00.1.701.672.002 Lift Station Rehab
200,000
277,000
477,000
050.80.90.00.1.702.665.079 SCADA Wireless Telemetry
59,000
60,000
119,000
050.80.90.00.1.703.672.003 Combined Sewer Improvements
800,000
112,000
912,000
1
1,956,405
3,305,405
All other Water and Sewer Fund accounts
11,493,921
-
11,493,921
Total Water and Sewer Fund
12,842,921
1,956,405
14,799,326
061 Vehicle Replacement Fund
061.80.86.00.1.000.660.003 Police Dept Vehicles
-
71,400
71,400
061.80.86.00.1.000.660.006 Public Works Vehicles
664,000
289,500
953,500
664,000
360,900
1,024,900
All other Vehicle Replacement Fund accounts
-
-
-
Total Vehicle Replacement Fund
664,000
360,900
1,024,900
Total Village Budget
Funds being changed
63,810,885
5,870,302
69,681,187
All other Village Budget Accounts
29,331,163
-
29,331,163
Total Village Budget after Changes
93,142,048
5,870,302
99,012,350
3
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Budget Amendment No. 1
Fiscal Year January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013
Revenues
Fund /Account Number Account Description
Current
Budget
Amount
Increase
(Decrease)
Amended
Budget
Amount
042 Cmmty Development Block Grant
042.418.002 Comm Dev Block Grant
All other Cmmty Development Block Grant accounts
Total Cmmty Development Block Grant Fund
Total Estimated Revenues
Fund being changed
All other Village Budget accounts
Total Estimated Revenues After Changes
230,203
170,206
400,409
230,203
170,206
400,409
60,000
60,000
290,203
170,206
460,409
290,203
170,206
460,409
94,452,388
-
94,452,388
94, 742, 591
170,206
94, 912, 797
1
MEMORANDUM
Lm?
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE, MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: MARCH 1, 2013
SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONI APPROVING THE 2013 OFFICIAL, ZONING MAP
State Statutes require that the Village Board approve the Official Zoning map by March 31 of each
year to reflect the changes that have occurred in the previous calendar year. Staff has completed all the
necessary modifications to the 2013 , Official Zoning Map and requests that the Village Board approve
the attached resolution.
Please forward this memorandum to the Village Board for the review and consideration at their March
19" meeting. Staff will be present at the meeting to discuss this matter further.
T -
William , Cooney Jr, AICP
Director of Communi y Development
tie I kidSTLAN',W,1111 z ,,g N&,pQ013,2011 Offi-A Z M M—od—
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
Effective: March 31, 2013
ZONING DISTRICTS
R1
OFFICE
NEIGHBORHOOD • ' '
. ' COMMUNITY SHOPPING
. ' COMMUNITY SHOPPING '
B4 - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR
B4* - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR PUD
B5 - CENTRAL COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL B5* - CENTRAL PUD
• 5C - CENTRAL COMMERCIAL CORE
COMMERCIAL CORE PUD
11 - LIMITED INDUSTRIAL
11* - LIMITED INDUSTRIAL PUD
12 - RAILROAD
13 - SOLID WASTE HANDLING DISTRICT
P1 - OFF STREET PARKING
R1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R1* - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PUD
R2 -ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R2* - ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PUD
R3 - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
R3* - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PUD
R4 - MULTI - FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
R4* - MULTI - FAMILY DEVELOPMENT PUD
R5 - SENIOR CITIZEN RESIDENCE
RA - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
RX - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
RX* - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PUD
•"•' k •• •
0.5 0.25 0
F AP ro jects\Com m_dev\ZO N 1 N G_BW_2013. mxd
Printed by JJP /PW
0.5
1
? 5 Miles
1.5
2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2013 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, as mandated by the Illinois Compiled Statutes 5/11- 13 -19, the Corporate
Authorities shall cause to be published no later than March 31 of each year, a map
showing the existing zoning uses, divisions, restrictions, regulations and classifications
for such municipality for the preceding year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS:
SECTION ONE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby adopt and approve the 2013 Mount Prospect Official Zoning Map, attached
hereto and presented as "Exhibit A."
SECTION TWO: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of March, 2013.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H: \CLKO \WI WRESOLUTION\Zoning Map,2013.doc