Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6. NEW BUSINESS 9/16/03 eptember 3, 2003 Mir. Bill Cooney ~rector of Commumty Development illage of Mount Prospect lCD South Emerson Avenue I~iount Pro~ect. IL 60056 t~e: Second Reading Waiver Request D, lear Mr. Cooley: 'l~e Hertz Corporation is requesIing that the second reading be waived and re, quest that the Village Board take final action during the September 16th m, eefing. We have received a favorable ruling fi'om the Plarming and Zoning Commission b~ a vote of seven to one in our favor. The lease has been signed by the owner alld we would like ~o expedite the process so we may start opcratin~ our business in the town of Mount Prospect. 8P}~ase call me at 847-815-1503 if you have any questior~. My fax number is -827-0138. Thank you in advance for yoar consideration. Sincerely? HLE Administrative Manager T~/jo cq: D. Marscten RECEIVED FROH:l~47~27013~ P.~I illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 2003 PZ-30-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (AUTO RENTAL) 905 E. RAND ROAD (SUNRISE PLAZA) HERTZ RENTAL - APPLICANT The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-30-03, a request to operate an auto rental agency, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their August 28, 2003 meeting. The Subject Property is a commercial center located on Rand Road, northwest of Mount Prospect Road. The proposed auto rental agency's fleet of vehicles would be limited to cars and minivans and the number of fleet vehicles would not exceed ten vehicles. The Zoning Ordinance lists auto sales, new and used as a Conditional Use in the B3 District, but does not specifically list auto rental agencies. Further review of the Zoning Ordinance indicated that auto rental agencies are not listed as Conditional or Permitted Uses in any of the Zoning Districts. Staff interpreted the proposed auto rental agency as being of a similar use and intensity as auto sales, which requires Conditional Use approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the location of where the fleet vehicles would be parked, how the conditions listed in the Staff Report would help to minimize the impact of the use, in addition, to the fact that the rental agency would generate less activity than many other permitted uses in the B3 District. The Planning & Zoning Commission members voted 7-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve a request for a Conditional Use to operate an auto rental agency for the property at 905 E. Rand Road, Case No. PZ-30-03. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 16, 2003 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William ~P CASE NO. PZ-30-03 PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: PIN #: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Dave Marsden for Hertz Rental 2170 S. Mannheim Rd. Des Plaines, IL 60018 August 13, 2003 905 E. Rand Rd. 03-35-307-008 Conditional Use to operate a car rental agency in the B3 Zoning District Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist None William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development Marisa Wameke, Neighborhood Planner Marian Betz Susan Flodin Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 24 meeting, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The July meeting minutes were approved 7-0. At 7:35, under Old Business, Ms. Juracek said that the Planning & Zoning Commission would not address Case No. PZ-13-03, a Text Amendment for Lighting Regulations, at this meeting. She said that there would be a workshop on September 1 I, 2003 to discuss this item. At 7:45, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-30-03, a request for a Conditional Use to operate a car rental agency in a retail store. Ms. Juracek said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. William Cooney, Director of Community Development, presented the case. He said the Subject Property is located on the west side of Rand Road, northwest of Mount Prospect Road, and contains a retail/commercial shopping center with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned B3 Community Shopping. The Zoning Ordinance lists auto sales; new and used as a Conditional Use in the B3 District, but does not specifically list auto rental agencies. He said that further review of the Zoning Ordinance indicated that auto rental agencies are not listed as Conditional or Permitted Uses in any of the Zoning Districts. Staff interpreted the proposed auto rental agency as being of a similar use and intensity as auto sales. Therefore, it requires Conditional Use approval. Mr. Cooney reviewed the Petitioner's exhibits and application for the rental agency. He said that the information indicates that the auto rental agency would locate in a 1,000 square foot storefront and would include a fleet of no more than 10 vehicles on-site. He noted that the fleet would be limited to cars and mini-vans and the agency would not offer track rentals at this location. The Petitioner stated in the application that vehicles would be stored at the rear of the building, which would not adversely impact parking for customers. Mr. Cooney said that the proposed auto rental agency meets the Conditional Use standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance subject to complying with the following conditions: 1) The maximum number of fleet vehicles stored on-site cannot exceed ten (10) vehicles; 2) Park all rental vehicles in the parking spaces behind the building/along the west lot line to not take up customer parking on Rand Road; 3) Replace all dead/dying landscaping; lanning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-30-03 Page 2 4) The type of vehicles to be rented on-site are limited to cars and mini-vans. He said that Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for an auto rental agency for the property located at 905 E. Rand Road, Case No. PZ-30- 03. He said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Ms. Juracek asked whether the Commissioners had any questions for Staff. There was discussion regarding whether there would be sufficient parking at this location if the vehicles used ten parking spaces. Mr. Cooney said that there would be more than enough parking to meet code requirements for the other stores located in the commercial shopping center. Susan Flodin, Hertz representative, was sworn in. She said that they have expanded their business to accommodate auto repair and auto dealerships and would like to expand their services to Mount Prospect residents. She said that for business reasons, they never want to see more than a couple of cars on the lot. When they have a limit of ten vehicles allowed on-site, they want these vehicles to be rented. She said that Hertz would even move cars from this location to accommodate reservations at another location. On average, a Hertz Rental performs 20-25 transactions in a 12-hour day, which includes both rentals and returns. Ms. Flodin said that it is a full service operation, but onsite cleaning, gassing, or maintenance of the cars would not offered at this location. She said that the hours of operation are Monday through Friday 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Saturday 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM, and closed on Sundays. She noted that there will be no vehicles on the lot on Sundays and that any vehicles left on Saturday will most likely be moved back to O'Hare for Monday-morning reservations. Ms. Flodin also stated that there is no after-hour drop off at this location. Marian Betz, 2 N. Albert Street, was sworn in. She informed the Planning & Zoning Commission that the existing townhouses and commercial businesses already created too much traffic in the neighborhood. In addition, trucks and speeders created a dangerous environment for the small children living in the neighborhood. Ms. Juracek suggested that Ms. Betz present her concerns to the Safety Commission so they may investigate the situation further. There was discussion on traffic problems that might be generated by the proposed rental agency. Mr. Cooney said that an auto rental is a less intensive use and would actually generate less traffic than other uses permitted in the B3 District. The Commission discussed the merits 0f restricting vehicular access from the property onto Albert Street, but there was consensus that this proposal did not warrant this change. Chairperson Juracek closed the hearing at 8:00 pm. Joseph Donnelly made a motion to recommend approval to the Village Board of the requested Conditional Use for approval to operate a car rental at the retail store at 905 E Rand Road with the four conditions listed in the Staff report, for Case No. PZ-30-03. Richard Rogers seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Cotten, Donnelly, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. At 9:17 p.m, Joseph Donnelley made motion to adjourn, seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned../~, ff///~/ Marisa Warneke, Neighborhood P-'Ianner D~irl~ic~cmr J~ f~n emmY~nQIt~ PD'e Je 1 o p ment H:\PLAN~Plannlng & Zoning COMMXP&Z 2003~Vlinutes\PZ-30-03 905 l~. Rand - Herlz Rental doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 30-03 LOCATION: PETITIONER: OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 905 E. Rand Road (Sunhse Plaza) Hertz Corporation David Goldenberg 03-35-307-008-0000 1.3 acres (57,368.52 square feet) B3 Community Shopping Retail/Commercial Shopping Center Conditional Use - Auto Rental Agency LOCATION MAP 109 103 )ad Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANrNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 21, 2003 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 28, 2003 SUBJECT: PZ-30-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (AUTO RENTAL AGENCY 905 E. RAND ROAD SUNRISE PLAZA (HERTZ CORP) BACKGROLrND A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 28, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Hertz Corporation (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 905 E. Rand Road (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has requested Conditional Use approval to operate an auto rental agency in the existing retail/commercial shopping center. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the August 13, 2003 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the west side of Rand Road, north of Mount Prospect Road, and contains a retail/commercial shopping center with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned B3 Community Shopping and is bordered by the B3 District to the north, east, and west and by the R3 Low Density Residence to the west. The construction of the existing center was completed approximately two years ago and the owner is in the process of leasing out the last tenant spaces. The site was constructed according to all Village Codes and regulations. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Zoning Ordinance lists auto sales, new and used as a Conditional Use in the B3 District, but does not , specifically list auto rental agencies. Further review of the Zoning Ordinance indicated that auto rental agencies are not listed as Conditional or Permitted Uses in any of the Zoning Districts. Staff interpreted the proposed auto rental agency as being of a similar use and intensity as auto sales. Therefore, it requires Conditional Use approval. The attached exhibits and application detail the Petitioner's plans for the rental agency. The information indicates that the auto rental agency would maintain a fleet of no more than 10 vehicles on-site at the Subject Property. · Also, the fleet would be limited to cars and mini-vans and the agency would not offer truck rentals at this location. The Petitioner states in the application that vehicles would be stored at the rear of the building, which would not adversely impact parking for customers. Z-30-03 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Vilhige Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: The Cor~ditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. Staff conducted a site inspection as part of the zoning review and found that some of the landscaping that would screen the rear parking area from the existing tOwnhomes has died or is in the Processing of dYing. Replacing the landscaping would ensure that the vehicles would be screened from the adjacent multi-family residences. Also, Staff found that parking the rental vehicles in this area would reduce the rental agency's impact on the shopping center because the preferred parking spaces, in front of the stores, would remain available to shoppers. In addition, limiting the maximum number of rental vehicles to no more than ten (10) and prohibiting truck rentals at this site would have minimal impact on the center and would not create a parking deficiency. Therefore, the proposed auto rental agency would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood, utility provision or public streets and the proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. However, it is important that the Petitioner parks the vehicles behind the center and that the property owner replaces the dead/dying landscaping. RECOMMENDATION The proposed auto rental agency meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance subject to complying with the following conditions: 1) Replace all dead/dying landscaping; 2) Park all rental vehicles in the parking spaces behind the building/along the west lot line; 3) The maximum number of fleet vehicles stored on-site cannot exceed ten (10) vehicles; 4) The type of vehicles to be rented on-site are limited to cars and mini-vans. Based on the above analysis and compliance with the three conditions, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for an auto rental agency for the property located at 905 E. Rand Road, Case No. PZ-30-03. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William J Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval Case Number v&z ->,,: Development Name/Address Date of Submission Hear~g Date Address(es) (Street Number, Street) 905 E. Rand Rd, Mount Prospect, IL Site Area (Acres) I property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) 1.317I B-3 13,275 Setbacks: Front Rear Side Side 30ft 2Oft 10ft 10ft Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces 20ft 23.13% 68 Adjacent Land Uses: North South East West Comm-Retail Commercial- Retail Commercial-Retail Residential Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s) 03-35-307-008-0000 Legal Description (attach additional skeets if necessary) Lot 1 in Sunrise Plaza plat of consolidation, being a subdivision in the west ½ of the southwest % of section 35 Township 42 North, range 11, east of the third principal meridian, in Cook County Name Telephone (day) Eileen Kenah 847-759-2252 Corporation Telephone (evening) The Hertz Corporation 847-815-1822 Street Address Fax 2170 S. Marmheim Rd 866-999-0066 City State Zip Code Pager Des Plaines IL 60018 Interest in Properly Lessee Name Telephone (day) David Goldenberg 847-498-5151 Corporation Telephone (evening) Sunrise Plaza, LLC 847-477-8153 . Street Address Fax: 3000 W. Dundee Rd. 847-498-5890 City State Zip Code Pager Northbrook IL 60062 Developer Name David Goldenberg Telephone (day) 847-498-5151 Sunr/se Plaza, LLC Address Fax 347-495.5890 3000 W. Dundee Rd, Suite 112 Nonhbrook, IL 60062 Attorney Name Phillip Grossman Telephone (day) 847-673-4555 8707 Skokie Blvd. Address Fax 847-673 -4561 Skokie, IL 60077 Surveyor Name Professionals Associated Telephone (day) 847-675-3000 7100 N. Tripp 847-675-2167 Address Fax Lincolnwood, IL 60712 Engineer Name Glen Eriksson Telephone (day) 847-223-4804 Eriksson Engineering Assoc. Address Fax 847-223-46864 145 Commerce Dr. Suite A Grayslake, IL 60030 Architect Name David Mangurterl Telephone (day): 847-945-6869 KMA Associates 847-945-0284 Address Fax 1141 Lake Cook Rd, Suite F Deerfield, IL 60015 Landscape Architect Name N/A Telephone (day): Address Fax Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Wv~v.mountprospect.org Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 S~U__M_MA~_R_Y_..._Of_A_C_.T_J~_S~RE~Q_U_E_~_T_E_D .... Proposed Conditional Use (~s liste~d i~n_the z_oni~n.K__ - ..... district) Car Rental (classified as similar to auto sales}. i Describe in Detail the Buil_d.~g_s_ and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary) Hertz Rent A Car plans on leasing 1,089 sq ft of space in unit 300 at the Sunrise Plaza. The activities would consist of rental m~d return of vehicles to individuals who may have had their own vehicle damaged in an accident or in a local shop for repair. An additional car rental office would increase competition with the existing car rental offices, which is beneficial to Mount Prospect residents and businesses. A maximum of 10 cars would be stored at the rear of the building. A rental car operation will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The location will be _operated in a safe manner. (Continued) i Hours of _Ope~ratio~n_ Monday__-~F_ri_d_az 7:00AM - 6:00 PM, Saturda'~ 9:00AM - 12:00 PM, Sunda)'.Closed · PROPOSED SITE INFORMATION Address(es) (Street Number, Street) Suite 300, 905 E. Rand Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 i Site Area (Acres) 1_.317 Property Zoning B-3 I Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) 13,275 Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use 1,089 i Setbacks: ! Front 30 fl: ' Rear 20 fl Side 10 fl Side 10Ft [ Building Height 20 fl: Lot Coverage (%) 23.13% Number of Parklng Spaces 10 Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the propert5' during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my 'knowledge. Applicant If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner Date Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary) (Continued) A caw rental operation will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of the property in the immediate vicinity and will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Traffic will be Iess intensive for a car rental operation than for other retail uses. In addition, cars will be serviced off-site. There will be no track rental at the site and the ta4'gest vehicle rented will be a 7 passenger Mini-van. It is believed that occupied retail space adds more value to the neighboring property than vacant space. A car rentaI operation will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surroundifig property uses. A car rental operation will be a compliment to the existing businesses in the area such as automobile dealerships and vehicle repair shops. In addition, Hertz is a national partner with AAA Motor Club which is a tenant at ti'tis site. Adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities are provided. Hertz does not intend to alter the exterior of the site in any manner. As mention above, a car rental operation contributes less traffic to the site than other retail uses. A car rental operation is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the village and will conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Hertz' lease has not been finalized at this time. The lease in contingent on the approval of the Conditional Use application. NORTH PLAT OF SURVEY VWL 9/10/03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 905 EAST RAND ROAD WHEREAS, The Hertz Corp. (hereinafter referred to as "PetitioneF) has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respect to propertY located at 905 East Rand Road, (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property'~ and legally described as follows: Lot 1 in Sunrise Plaza plat of consolidation, being a subdivision in the west % of the southwest ¼ of Sec. 35 Township 42 North, Range 11, east of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL. Property Index Number: 03-35-307-008-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to operate an automobile rental agency in a B-3 (Community Shopping) Zoning District; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit being the subject of PZ-30-03 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28~ day of August, 2003, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal on the 13th day of August, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-30-03; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. 905 E. Rand Road Page 2/2 SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of.Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit, as provided in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code, to allow the operation of an auto rental agency on the Subject Property, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as "Exhibit A." SECTION THREE: Prior to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use permit, the following conditions and/or written documentation shall be fulfilled: 1. Replace all dead/dying landscaping; 2. Park all rental vehicles in the parking spaces behind the building/along the west lot line; 3. The maximum number of fleet vehicles stored on-site shall not exceed ten (10) vehicles; 4. The type of v, ehicles to be rented on-site is limited to cars and mini-vans. SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:~CLKO\files\WIN'~ORDINANC\Con Use,Hertz, Rand Rd.Sept,03.doc eptember 05, 2003 William J. Cooney, AICP Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Mr. Cooney, The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of our unenclosed porch by a 7-0 vote. Our case is scheduled to go before Village BOard for the ordinance's first reading September 16, 2003. We are requesting that the Village Board waive the second reading, tentatively scheduled for the second Village Board meeting, and take final action at the September 16, 2003 meeting. We would like to start the project as soon as possible because the existing porch is rotting, and we need to waterproof the comer of our foundation. We appreciate your assistance in facilitating this request. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at 847/392-8843. Sincerely~ ~ Mark and Eileen Sarasin 213 S. Edward Street ~, IL 60056 illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 2003 PZ-31-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (PORCH) 213 S. EDWARD STREET EILEEN SARASIN - APPLICANT The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-31-03, a request for an unenclosed covered porch, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their August 28, 2003 meeting. The Subject Property is located in a single-family residential neighborhood. The proposed porch would encroach no more than 5-feet into the required 30-foot front yard setback. Therefore, it requires Conditional Use approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the Petitioner's plans to improve the porch and how it would be required to remain unenclosed. The Planning & Zoning Commission members voted 7-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve a request for a Conditional Use permit for the construction of an unenclosed porch to encroach no more than five-feet into the front yard for the property at 213 S. Edward Street, Case No. PZ-31-03. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 16, 2003 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. Co~oney, Jr., MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-31-03 PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: PIN #: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Eileen Sarasin August 13, 2003 213 S. Edward St. 08-12-218-007 Conditional Use for a porch Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist None William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development Marisa Wameke, Neighborhood Planner Eileen Sarasin Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 24 meeting, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The July meeting minutes were approved 7-0. At 7:35, under Old Business, Ms. Juracek said that the Planning & Zoning Commission would not address Case No. PZ-13-03, a Text Amendment for Lighting Regulations, at this meeting. She said that there would be a workshop on September 11, 2003 to discuss this item. At 8:02, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-31-03, a request for a Conditional Use for a porch. Ms. Juracek said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. William Cooney, Director of Community Development, presented the case. He said that the Petitioner has requested Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a new, unenclosed porch to encroach 5 feet into the required 30- foot setback. He said that the Subject Property is located on the east side of Edward Street, between Evergreen and Milbum Avenues, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. Mr. Cooney described the Subject Residence and said that it is a Chicago-style bungalow with a raised wooden stairway that the Petitioner proposes to demolish and rebuild, but make larger to accommodate outdoor furniture. He said that the size of the new 'stairway' measures 5' 10" x 12'6" which is more in keeping with the characteristics of an unenclosed porch. The Petitioner's plans are consistent with previous proposals over the past years. Staff believes that this addition would be an asset to the community and the area. Mr. Cooney said that the proposed unenclosed porch meets the Conditional Use standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for an unenclosed porch to encroach no more than 5-feet into the required front yard for the residence at 213 S. Edward Street, Case No. PZ-31-03. He said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Eileen Sarasin, 213 S. Edward Street, was sworn in. She clarified that the location of the stairs and said that the proposed porch would not exceed past the existing structure. They plan to increase the landing size, but not the length of the stairs. Ms. Sarasin explained that the porch needed to be replaced because of rotting wood, and that they would like to design it so that they might be able to enjoy it more than the smaller, previous design allowed. lanning & Zoning Commission PZ-31-03 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 There was discussion regarding whether the porch would remain an unenclosed structure. Ms. Sarasin rePlied that they had no intention of enclosing the porch. Chairperson Juracek asked if anyone in the audience wanted to address the Planning & Zoning Commission about this case. Since there was no response, she closed the hearing at 8:08 pm. Merrill Cotten made a motion to recommend approval to the Village Board of the requested Conditional Use for an unenclosed porch to encroach no more than 5-feet into the required front yard for the residence at 213 S. Edward Street, for Case No. PZ-31-03, Matthew Sledz seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Cotten, Donnelly, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek Motion was approved 7-0. NAYS: None Although the hearing was closed, Ms. Juracek asked whether Staff could research removing the Conditional Use requirement for unenclosed porches and list them as a permitted encroachment in the Zoning Ordinance due to numerous petitions. Mr. Cooney replied that Staff would be addressing the Village Board on September 9, 2003 to inquire whether the Village Board would consider making requests for unenclosed porches in the front yard final at the Planning & Zoning Commission level. At 9:17 p.m, Joseph Donnelley made motion to adjourn, seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Marisa Wameke, Neighborhood Planner William ~.~'oone~, AICP, Director of Community Development H:~PLAN~Plannlng & Zoning COMM~I~&Z 2003\Minutes~PZ-31-03 213 S. Edward St - unenclosed porch.doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 31-03 LOCATION: PETITIONERS: OWNERS: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 213 S. Edward Street Mark & Eileen Sarasin Mark & Eileen Sarasin 08-12-218-007-0000 0. t 8 acres (8,000 square feet) RA Single Family Residence Single Family Residential Conditional Use - Porch in front yard LOCATION MAP Busse Avenue 10! 100 103 102 107 106 109 108 111 I10 113 115 114 117 116 119 121 122 101 100 Ifil 102 10~ 104 106 109 108 111 110 115 114 117 116 119 121 118 200 206 ~ r~verg teen A ue 209 208 209 208 217 216 ~ 216 221 220 [, 221 220 iilburn Avenue Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 21, 2003 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 28, 2003 SUBJECT: PZ-31-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (PORCH) 213 S. EDWARD STREET (SARASIN RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 28, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Mark & Eileen Sarasin (the "Petitioner")regarding the property located at 213 S. Edward Street (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has requested Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a new, unenclosed porch in the front yard. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the August 13, 2003 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250~feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the east side of Edward Street, between Evergreen and Milbum Avenues, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. The existing home on the Subject Property is currently set back slightly more than 30-feet from the front lot line (30.10'), 9.43-feet from the north (side) lot line, and 13- feet from the south (side) lot line. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Subject Residence is a Chicago-style bungalow. It has a raised wooden stairway that the Petitioner proposes to demolish and rebuild, but make larger to accommodate outdoor furniture. T he size of the new'stairway' measures 5' 10" x 12'6" which is more in keeping with the characteristics of an unenclosed porch. The attached exhibits detail the Petitioner's plans and indicate that the proposed unenclosed porch would be constructed according to Village Codes. The wooden stairs and porch floor would be secured with railings as required by International Residential One and Two Family Dwelling Code regulations. The area under the porch would be enclosed with a wooden lattice to prevent animals from burrowing and/or living in this area, but would still allow the Petitioner access to maintain the area. The proposed unenclosed porch, consisting of a wood floor and wood railings, would encroach no more than five (5)-feet into the required front yard, thus requiring Conditional Use approval. Z-31-03 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 3 GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The existing home and proposed improvement comply with zoning regulations. The table on the following page compares the Petitioner's proposal to the RA Single Family Residence district's bulk requirements. RA Single Family District Existing Proposed Minimum Requirements SETBACKS: Front 30' 30.10' 25' Interior 5' 13' south & no change 9.43' north no change Rear 25' 82' (house) no change LOT COVERAGE 50% Maximum 39% 40% CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: · The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The proposal would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood, utility provision or public streets and the proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION The proposed unenclosed porch meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for an unenclosed porch to encroach no more than 5-feet into the required front yard for the residence at 213 S. Edward Street, Case No. PZ-31-03. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: VII,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval Case Number Development Name/Address Date of Submission Hearing Date Address(es) (Street Number, Street) Site Are~ (Acres) Property Zoning I Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Setbacks: Front Rear Side Side Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces Adjacent Land Uses: North South East West Tax 1.D. Number or Coun~ Assigned P~ Number(s) Legal Description (aaaoh additional sheets ifnecessa~) Lot l? in BIo~L 19 0¢ 5~e'~ Ea~n a~d~'~ % ~. P~pe~ E ~ Iff ,z ~ e~' n 12 ~nsh' o . I E Name ~T~e~ ph 9n e,,( d_ay)_~. Co~oration Telephone (evening) S~'~et Address Fax Ci~ State Zip Code Pager . Interest in Prop¢~ Name Telephone (day}. . x- . . - ' Co~oration Telephone (evening) Street Address Fax: 213 S. ~ard Ci~ State Zip Code Pager Developer, . Name ~i~ ~d~ CO~~ Telephone(day) Address ~1 ~C~ C~U~ ~ ~e~ (qo~)qO~- qoqo Attorney Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Surveyor Name Telephone (day) Add~ F~x Engineer Nme Telephone (day) Address Fax Architect Name ~Dn mae, n Tqlephone(day): (~1~-~. Address q~ W. Lla~ 5~ ~ax C~hamoo;o n. tL. Landscape Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 roposed Conditional Use (as listed in the zoning district) Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activit'ies Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary) por . lid % be on ide Address(es) (S~eet Number, S~eet) Site Area (Acres) Propeny Zoning Total Building Sq. FtJ (Site) Sq, Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use Setbacks: Front Rear Side Side Building Heigh[ LOt Coverage (%) Number of Park~g Spaces Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject propertY. I hereby affirm that ail information provided.herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Ovmer Date Mount Prospect Department of Communi~' Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.mountvrosvect.om Phon~ 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 PLAT OF SURVEY . r. OT 18 ~N BLOC~ 17 OF BUSSE'S EASTERN ADDITION TO MOUNT PROSPECT IN THE EAST HALF (1/2)?~9~~I~ .~TION 12, TOWNSHIP 4I NORTH, RANGE lI, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, LINOIS. MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 213 SOUTH EDWARD~STRE~T_~ MT PROSPECT, ILlinOIS pare ~he description on Ibis plal wilh your deed. abslracl. HOUSE~ , 01/'04/~999 15:85 217-37~ . t' 5A~IN FOR, CH 4/23~03 213 5. EDWARD MT. PROSPECT PHONE; (847) 352-8843 vwl 9/1 O/O3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 213 SOUTH EDWARD STREET WHEREAS, Mark and Eileen Sarasin (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 213 South Edward Street (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property), legally described as follows: Lot 18 in Block 17 of Busse's Eastern Addition to Mount Prospect in the East Half of Sec. 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL. Property Index Number: 08-12-218~007-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to construct an unenclosed covered porch within five-feet (5') of the thirty-foot (30') minimum front yard setback as required in Section 14.1003.A of the Mount Prospect Village Code; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Conditional Use being the subject of PZ~31-03 before the Planning; and Zoning Commission on the 28th day of August, 2003, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal on the 13th day of August, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ~31-03; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. 213 S. Edward Street Page 2/2 SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit for the construction of an unenclosed porch within five-feet (5') of the thirty-foot (30') minimum front yard setback as required in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Mount Prospect Village Code as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:'~CLKO\fires/WIN\ORD[NANC\ConUse, 213 Edward,porch, Sept,03.doc Page 1 of 1 Cooney, Bill From: Pash1512@aol.com Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:15 PM To: Cooney, Bill Subject: Variation - Request to waive 2nd reading Dear Mr. Cooney, The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the Villiage Board approve our request for [o locate a shed in our side yard. I am requesting that the Village Board waive the second reading, tentatively scheduled for the second Village Board meeting and take final action at the September 16th meeting. We are anxious to start this project as soon as possible. We appreciate your assistance in facilitating this request. Please contact us at 847.803.2388 or email us at PASH1512@aol.com should you have any questions. Sincerely, Pat & Gall Pannozzo 902 Sumac Lane Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 9/8/2003 illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 2003 PZ-32-03 - VARIATION (SIDE YARD SETBACK - SHED) 902 SUMAC LANE PAT & GAIL PANNOZZO - APPLICANTS The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-32-03, a request to locate a shed two-feet from the interior lot line, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their August 28, 2003 meeting. The Subject Property is located in a single-family residential neighborhood. The proposed shed is required to maintain a five-foot setback (minimum), but the Petitioner proposes a two-foot setback. Therefore, the location requires VariatiOn approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the Subject Property and noted that it is irregularly shaped. They discussed the stormwater flow and how it collects in a portion of the yard, which limits possible locations for a shed. The Planning & Zoning Commission members voted 7-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve a Variation request to locate a shed two-feet from the interior lot line, subject to the size of the shed not exceeding 8'x12' for the property at 902 Sumac Lane, Case No. PZ-32-03. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 16, 2003 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. CASE NO. PZ-32-03 PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: PIN #: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Pat & Gail Pannozzo August 13, 2003 902 Sumac Lane 03-25-404-020 Variation side yard Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist None William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development Marisa Warneke, Neighborhood Planner Pat & Gall Pannozzo paul Tait Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 24. meeting, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The July meeting minutes were approved 7-0. At 7:35, under Old Business, Ms. Juracek said that the Planning & Zoning Commission would not address Case No. PZ-13-03, a Text Amendment for Lighting Regulations, at this meeting. She said that there would be a workshop on September 11, 2003 to discuss this item. At 8:09, Ms. Juracek introduced Case Noi PZ-32-03, a request for a Variation to a side yard setback. Ms. Juracek said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. William Cooney, Director of Community Development, presented the case. He said that the Petitioner is seeking a Variation to locate a shed two-feet from the interior lot line when the Zoning Ordinance requires a five-foot setback. He reported that the Subject Property is located on the west side of Sumac Lane, between Kiowa and Hopi Lanes, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. He said that the Subject Property is zoned R1 Single Family Residence and is bordered by the R1 District on all sides. The Petitioner would like to remove the existing shed and construct a new 8'x12' shed twozfeet from the sire/north ~o~ line. he Petitioner stated in their application that meeting the five-foot setback requirement would require locating the shed in an area of the yard that is prone to flooding or in a location that would minimize the amount of usable yard. Mr. Cooney noted that the Subject Property is irregularly shaped and that a portion of the house encroaches into the required 25-foot rear setback. He said that the exiSting house is a legal nonconformity and is allowed to remain. The proposed shed is required to maintain a minimum separation of three-feet from the house and five-feet from the rear and side lot lines. The Petitioner is seeking relief from zoning code requirements for the interior side yard setback to locate an accessory structure two-feet from the lot line. The Subject Property would comply with all other zoning regulations and the shed would be constructed according to Village Code. Mr. Cooney said that although the proposed shed may not necessarily create an obstruction for stormwater flow, the request does not meet the Variation standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance because there is no apparent hardship. Also, the shed could be constructed in locations that comply with zoning regulations. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend that the Village Board deny a Variation request to allow a two-foot side yard setback in order to construct a shed at the residence at 902 Sumac Lane, Case No. PZ-32-03. He said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. lanning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-32-03 Page 2 Richard Rogers inquired about the location of the existing shed because it is next to the building. Mr. Cooney replied that current code does not allow a shed to be placed next to a building. According to current code, a three-foot separation between a building and a shed is required. Pat Pannozzo, 902 Sumac Lane, was sworn in. Mr. Pannozzo said that he would like to put the shed off to the side so it is not visible from the patio and allows for more play-space for his children. He said that he cannot place the shed 3 feet from the home because there is currently a concrete walk there. As a future improvement, he would like to replace the concrete walk with brick pavers. There was general discussion on the stormwater flow at the property. Mr. Pannozzo said that a drain currentlY existS but because his property is at the lowest point, the stormwater flow sits for 2-3 days. Mr. Pannozzo then provided pictures of his property for the Commissioners. Mr. Paul Tait, 906 Sumac Lane, was sworn in. Mr. Tait said that he lives two doors North of Mr. Pannozzo's property. Mr. Tait recommended Mr. Pannozzo's approval as requested. Mr. Tait said that he had no objections to the petition as presented. Kevin Youngquist commented how the back yard is compromised due to its irregular shape and compared it to the surrounding properties. Mr. YoungqUiSt agreed that the lot configuration was considered a hardship. Matthew Sledz stated that the flooding of the property is also considered a hardship. Leo Floros asked about the existing shed size. The current shed size is 6'x8', while the proposed shed size is 8'x12'. Currently the code allows bigger sheds. Mr. Sledz said he could support the proposal if the shed size is limited to .. 8'x12'. Chairperson Juracek closed the hearing at 8:25 pm. ': ~ Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend that the Village Board approve the requested side yard Variation, with the cOndition that the size of the shed not exceed 8'x12', for'Case No. PZ'32-03, Keith Youngquist seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Cotten, Donnelly, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. At 9:17 p.m, Joseph Donnelley made motion to adjourn, seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was aPproved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Marisa Warneke, Neighborhood Planner Director of Community Development C:\Win2kl?rofiles~JConnollXLoeal Settings\TempOrary Interest Files\OLK6$XPZ-32-03 902 Sumac Lane doe Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 32-03 LOCATION: PETITIONERS: OWNERS: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 902 Sumac Lane Pasquale & Gail Pannozzo Pasquale & Gail Pannozzo 03-35-404-020-0000 0.28 acres (12,059 square feet) R1 Single Family Residence Single Family Residential Variation - Interior Side Yard Setback (Shed LOcatiOn) · LOCATION MAP Kiowa Lane 925 924 923 922 9:, 832 830 800 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 21, 2003 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 28, 2003 SUBJECT: PZ-32-03 - VARIATION (INTERIOR SIDE YARD - SHED) 902 SUMAC LANE (PANNOZZO RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 28, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Pasquale & Gail Pannozzo (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 902 Sumac Lane (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to locate a shed two (2)-feet from the interior lot line when the Zoning Ordinance requires a five (5)-foot setback. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the August 13, 2003 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted a Public Heating sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the west side of Sumac Lane, between Kiowa and Hopi Lanes, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property, irregularly shaped, is zoned R1 Single Family Residence and is bordered by the R1 District on all sides. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Zoning Ordinance requires that accessory structures be located five (5)-feet from both the side and rear lot lines for properties that measure more than 55-feet in width at the required 30-foot front setback. While the width of the Subject Property exceeds 100-feet at the 30-foot setback, the Petitioner would like to remove the existing shed and construct a new 8'xl2' shed two (2)-feet from the side (north) lot line. The Petitioner states in the attached application that meeting the five (5)-foot setback requirements would require locating the shed in an area of the yard that is prone to flooding or in a location that would minimize the amount of usable yard. The Village requires a five (5)~foot setback in order to preserve the existing drainage patterns. This is intended to regulate changes in ground elevation, but also applies to anything that could pose as a potential obstruction to stormwater flow. To assist in the review of this matter the Village's Engineering Division reviewed the topography of the Subject Property and found that the proposed shed location would be near a high point on the property. Stormwater runoff would drain from the shed toward both the front and rear property lines, unimpeded by the proposed shed. The Engineering Division did not object to the Variation request, but will require that the shed be relocated (or another form of corrective action shall be taken) should the proposed shed obstruct the flow of stormwater on the Subject Property at a later date. PZ-32-03 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 3 GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The Subject Property is irregularly shaped and a portion of the house encroaches into the required 25-foot rear setback. The existing house, however, is a legal nonconformity and is allowed to remain. The proposed shed is required to maintain a minimum separation of three (3)-feet from the house and five (5)-feet from the rear and side lot lines. The Petitioner is seeking relief from code requirements for the interior side yard setback to locate an accessory structure two (2)-feet from the lot line. The Subject Property would comply with all other zoning regulations and the shed would be constructed according to Village Code. The following table compares the Petitioner's proposal to the Zoning Ordinance's requirements. RI Single Family District Existing Proposed Minimum Requirements SETBACKS (house): Front 30' 32.5' no change 10' or 10% of lot width Interior Whichever is less (10') 22.7' & 29' no change Rear 25' Varies from 20-43' no change SETBACKS (shed): Side 5' Currently not applicable 2' Rear 5' Currently not applicable 47' LOT COVERAGE 45% Maximum 25% 25.9% VARIATION USE STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and · Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner is proposing to locate a shed two (2)-feet from the interior lot line. Although the Subject Property bas an irregular shape, the proposed shed could be constructed in a location that complies with zoning regulations. The attached Exhibit A was prepared by Staff and indicates two (2) possible locations for the proposed shed that would: 1) meet zoning regulations; 2) not conflict with the area that floods (according to the Petitioner's experience); and 3) allow sufficient room between the air conditioning unit so animals could not burrow in between the shed and the unit. In addition, the Petitioner has the option of relocating the existing fence so it is closer to the 30-foot front setback, which would create additional yard area and alternative locations to construct the shed. Z-32-03 Planniog & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Although the proposed shed may not necessarily create an obstruction for stormwater flow, the request does not meet the Variation standards contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance because there is no apparent hardship. Also, the shed could be constructed in locations that comply with zoning regulations. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend to the Village Board denial of a Variation request to allow a two (2)-foot side yard setback in order to construct a shed at the residence at 902 Sumac Lane, Case No. PZ-32-03. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development IHALI. BI' }N TH~8 PLAT, ?.~- 2.~ ' ,^ STATE OF ILLINOIS'I, ocros~R I., 1~9-~ COUNTY OF COOK J ss I hereby ce~ll'l¥ Ih,q the buildings on Ici shown within property Ilnea .nd Ihat the =djoinlng ImproYamenls do not encroech on eeld premlsee. ~ . Thls Is a Morlgegee'e Inspection and to be other purpose, such ae installing fences. Corner., been set or monumentad. WICKMAN VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMM~rNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Pla.m-ting Division Mo~ Pros~ch ll]moi~ ~one ~7.8t8.532S FAX ~7.818 ~329 Variation Request Z ..... [[ II I '~ The Planning & Zoning Commission has final administrative authori~ for all petitions for fence variations and those variation request* th at do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a .requirement ~tipUlated by the Village's Zoning Ordinance. PETITION FOR FLANI~ING & ZONING CO~IMISSION REVIEW Village Bonrd Final Case Number PZ - - 02 Dat~' of ~abmissi~ .... Interest in Property Telephone (day) Tele~hone (evening) ,Name ~'~ Telephol'~e (daF) Co~o~a~P -' ' Tc!eghon~ (~mn~) .. t Sta~ ] ZiP Code Pas~r Developer ] Tel~hone (day) Na~ Telephone (day) Sm,cyor N~ T~lephone (day) A~ss Fax N~ Tel~honc (day): Addr~s Fax Lan~ca~ ~chimct N~ , Toluene (day): _ _ Phone 847.818.5328 Mount Frospecx Deparmae~t of Community' D~velopme~ Fax 847,$18.532.9 100 South Emerson Street, Mount ?ros~ae¢~ Illmoi,% 60056 · 2 TDD $~7.39'/.6064 lease no~e (nat ~e applicat{o~ will ~ot be a¢c~ed ~t~l ~s ~ion has ~ Culb' coa~ ~u~ ~t~ls ~ ~n sa~ly ~ to ~c P~ Division. it is s~ngly suggcs:ed ~at the pefi~oner schedule ~ appo~nt wi~ ~e In consifle~fion of~c ~tion con~cd ~ ~Js ~o~ as ~I1 ~ all supposing ,~cumc~on, it is requested that arpm~ be ~vea visu~ i~on of~ sa~ect p~. I ~ ~ ~t ~1 i~fo~o,'ided h~i~ ~ in all ~gaa s~b~tted ~ ass~iafi~ ~ ~s appliea~on ~e ~¢ an~ If ~lic~ is ~ ~ope~ o~en I ~reby ~ig~e ~e a~l~et as m~the pa~se of s~e~ ~e Variations) &~n~ in this ~licafio~ ~ the Mou~t P;ospeet I),qaat'~aent of C~mm~it3, Develol~eat 100 5omh Emet'~n Street, Mourn Pros-peet tllmeis. 60056 Phone ~47.$18,$328 Fax g47.g ~' $ 5329 TDD $47.392.606~ :>ON THL~ PLAT. T STATE OF ILLINOIS~. oc~-oB~R I., 1~93 ThlslsaMortgagee'alnspectlonancftobeus, COUNTY OF COOK J SS olher purpose, such as Installing fences, Corners been se~ or monumented. I hereby ce~lli'y that the buildings on lot shown are within property lines and Ihet theadjoinlng Improvements ~ do not encroach on said premises...../._) . WICKMAN VW L 9/9/03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 902 SUMAC LANE WHEREAS, Pasquale and Gall Pannozzo (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 902 Sumac Lane (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 20 in resubdivision of Lots 1 to 129 inclusive in Forest Manor unit #4 being a resubdivision in the SW Quarter and the SE quarter of Sec. 25 Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to plat of said resubdivision registered in the office of Registrar Titles of Cook County. Property Index Number: 03-35-404-020'0000 and WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation to allow an existing shed to encroach three-feet (3') feet within the five-foot (5') minimum side yard as required in Section 14.306.B.2 of the Mount Prospect Village COde; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of PZ-32-03 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28t~ day of August, 2003, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal on the 13th day of August, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and positive recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. 902 Sumac Lane Page 2/2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code, to allow the construction of a shed with an encroachment of three-feet (3') into the five-foot (5') minimum side yard required by the Mount Prospect Village Code, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as "Exhibit A." SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:/CLKO\fiies\WiN\ORDINANO\Variation 902 Sumac,shed, Sept-03 doc Girish J. Zaveri 721 W. Busse Ave. Mount Prospect, IL 50050 PHONE: (847) 670.92i0 FAX: (847) 670 - 9210 September I0, 200.3 William I. Cooney, AICP Director of ¢omraunity Development V'dlage of Mount Prospect Ioo s. Emerson Stm:t Mount Prospect, II ~56 Phone (847) 8 t 8-5328 Fax (847) gl 8-5329 Subj.: PZ.7.33-O3- Varl. a. fion (S dc Y~ Dear ~. Cooney .Above ca~e is ~¢heduled to go to Village Board for the first reading on September 16, 2003. I review~ your recommendation to Planing and Zoning Commission-to den)' the request for variation to my property as well as the c~mmittee's denial vote of Y-O on August 28, 2003 After such strong negative recommendations, [ will llke to save eve'l'yone's time and withdraw my request from the further eo~deration. t will like to thank you, Judy and Planniag &: Zoning Commission for the time ext~ded to my case. Thankyou. G. I. Zaveri RECEIVED FROM:B47 578 vw[ 9/9/03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 721 WEST BUSSE AVENUE WHEREAS, Girish Zaveri (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 721 West Busse Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 42 in Township Development Company We-Go Park Unit # 1, being a subdivision of the West ¼ of the NW Fractional Quarter of Sec. 11, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County. Property Index Number: 08-11-222-003-0000 and WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation to allow a room addition to encroach 2.85-feet within the seven-foot (7') minimum side yard as required in Section 14.905.B of the Mount Prospect Village Code, and 11.53-feet within the twenty-five foot (25') minimum rear yard setback as required in Section 14.905.B of the Code; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of PZ-33-03 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of August, 2003, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal on the 13th day of August, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and negative recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. 721 W. Busse Avenue Page 2/2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code, to allow a room addition to encroach 2.85-feet within the seven-foot (7') minimum side yard, and 11.53-feet within the twenty-five foot (25') minimum rear yard setback required by the Mount Prospect Village Code, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as "Exhibit A." SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H :\CLKO\files\WIN~O RDINA NO\Variation,721 Busse,setba ck,addition,Sept,03 .doc eptember 7, 2003 William J. Cooney, AICP Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Mr. Cooney, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of our request for a Conditional Use permit to construct a porch in the front yard by a vote of 7-0. Our case is scheduled to go before the Village Board for the ordinance's first reading on September 16. We are requesting that the Village Board waive the second reading, tentatively scheduled for October 7, 2003, and take final action on the September 16, 2003 meeting. This would allow us to start this improvement to our home as soon as possible. We appreciate your assistance with this request. Please contact us at 847-506-0079 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tim and Ila Brouder 318 S. Hi~Lusi Avenue Mount Prospect, IllinOi~ i50056 illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 2003 PZ-34-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (PORCH) 318 S. HI-LUSI ILA & TIM BROUDER- APPLICANTS The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-34-03, a request for an unenclosed covered porch, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their August 28, 2003 meeting. The Subject Property is located on a comer lot in a single-family residential neighborhood. The proposed porch would encroach no more than 5-feet into the required 30-foot front yard setback. Therefore, it requires Conditional Use approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the Petitioner's plans to improve the house and how the unenclosed porch would compliment the addition. The Petitioner was seeking relief from zoning bulk regulations to maintain the 19'6" side yard for the addition when the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-feet setback for new construction. However, the Variation request was final at the Planning & Zoning Commission level, but the porch requires Village Board approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission members voted 7-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve a request for a Conditional Use to allow the construction of an unenclosed porch to encroach no more than five-feet into the front yard for the property at 318 S. Hi-Lusi, Case No. PZ-34-03. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 16, 2003 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. ~P MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-34-03 PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: PIN #: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Ila & Tim Brouder August 13, 2003 318 Hi Lusi 08-11-217-020 Conditional Use (unenclosed porch) and Variation (side yard setback) Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist None William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development Marisa Warneke, Neighborhood Planner Ila & Tim Brouder Jeff Everett Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 24 meeting, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The July meeting minutes were approved 7-0. At 7:35, under Old Business, Ms. Juracek said that the Planning & Zoning Commission would not ad&ess Case No. PZ-13-03, a Text Amendment for Lighting Regulations, at this meeting. She said that there would be a workshop on September 11, 2003 to discuss this item. At 8:49, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-34-03, a request for a Conditional Use for an unenclosed porch in the front yard and a side yard setback Variation to allow an addition. Ms. Juracek said that the Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use, but the P&Z's decision would be final for the Variation. William Cooney, Director of Commur[ity Development, presented the case. He said that the Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow a 19'6" exterior side yard when the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot setback. In addition, the /~etitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval to construct an unenclosed porch in the required front yard setback. He reported that the Subject Property is located at the northwest intersection of Lincoln and Hi-Lusi and contains a single- family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. Mr. Cooney said that the Petitioner would like to add on to the house and that the plans include consWacting an unenclosed porch in the front yard and extending the structure along the south lot line to increase the size of the kitchen and family room on the first floor and create a master bedroom and larger closet on the second floor. In addition, the plans indicate that a porch would be added onto the rear elevation of the residence. Mr. Cooney reported that the Petitioner would like to maintain the existing exterior side yard setback, which is 19'6" for six linear feet of the addition. Since the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot setback for new construction, the Petitioner is seeking a Variation in order to add onto the house and maintain the existing 19'6" setback. Also, the proposed porch would encroach into the required 30-foot front yard and the Petitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval in order to construct the unenclosed front porch. Mr. Cooney stated that the Petitioner proposes to expand the existing home to create additional living space. He said that the Petitioner explored different designs for the addition that would meet the 20-foot exterior side yard and the end result was modification of the rear porch so it complied with the 20-foot setback. However, as stated in the attached lanning & Zoning Commission PZ-34-03 Arlene Suracek, Chairperson Page 2 application, the Petitioner felt that the 19'6" setback was necessary in order to expand the kitchen and keep it within the same space. Mr. Cooney reported that the Petitioner's request to expand the house and maintain the 19'6" exterior side yard does not meet the Variation standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance because the Subject Property is typical of most corner lots in the Village and the addition could be constructed according to zoning regulations. However, the proposed request to construct a porch in the front yard meets the Conditional Use standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny a Variation to allow a 19'6" exterior side yard for the proposed addition; the P&Z's decision is final for this portion of the project, and that the P&Z recommend that the Village Board approve the Conditional Use request to allow an unenclosed front porch as shown on the elevation and site plans prepared by. Jeffery William Everett, Architect, for the residence at 318 S. Hi-Lusi, Case No. PZ-34-03. He said that the Village Board's decision is final for this portion of the project. Ila Brouder, 318 S. Hi-Lusi Avenue, was sworn in. She stated that her home only has 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom and 3 other rooms in the home. She said that her home is unique because it does not sit square on the lot and was one of the first homes on Hi-Lusi Avenue. Currently, the property is under lot coverage and they are not looking to greatly increase it. Their goal is to renovate the home, not tear it down. Jeff Everett, 118 N. Maple Street, was sworn in. He reported that the home is currently 1,500 square feet and then he reviewed the square footage size of each aspect of the proposed addition. Richard Rogers said that six-inches was a minimal encroachment, especially when a bay window is allowed to project more than six-inches into the required yard. Mr.. Rogers noted that the character of the house would be harmed if the addition met the 20-foot setback requirement. Chairperson Juracek closed the hearing at 9:00 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend Village Board approve the requested Variation for a 19'6" exterior side yard setback for Case No. PZ~34-03. Joseph Donnelly seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Cotten, Donnelty, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek Motion was approved 7-0. NAYS: None Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend Village Board approve the requested Conditional Use for Case No. PZ- 34-03. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: Motion was approved 7-0. AYES: Floros, Cotten, Donnelly, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: None At 9:17 p.m, Joseph Donnelley made motion to adjourn, seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. H:\PLAN~lanning & Zoning COMM~&Z 2003~Minutes~Z-34-03 318 S. Hi Lusi - porch & side yard.doc ~~neke, Neighborhood Planner ~of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 34-03 LOCATION: PETITIONERS: OWNERS: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 318 S. Hi~Lusi Ila & Timothy Brouder Ila & Timothy Brouder 08-11-217-020-0000 0.21 acres (9,236.7 square feet) RA Single Family Residence Single Family Residential Variation (Side Yard Setback) and Conditional Use (Porch) LOCATION MAP 3OO 3O8 312 Evergreen Avenue 201 200 203 202 205 204 207 206 209 208 211 210 213 212 215 214 217 216 219 218 221 220 223 222 201 200 203 202 205 204 207 206 209 208 211 210 213 212 215 214 217 216 218 219 220 ~ 200 203 202 205 204 207 209 2~6 211 210 213 212 215 214 217 216 219 218 Milburn Avenue 301 300 303 302 305 304 307 306 309 308 311 310 313 312 315 314 317 316 301 300 303 302 305 304 307 306 309 308 311 310 3t3 312 315 314 317 316 319 318 301 ~300 Lincoln Street Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER AUGUST 2 I, 2003 AUGUST 28, 2003 PZ-34-03 - VARIATION (SDE YARD) & CONDITIONAL USE (PORCH) 318 S. HI-LUSI (BROUNDER RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 28, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Ila & Timothy Brouder (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 318 S. Hi-Lusi (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow a 19'6" exterior side yard (south lot line) south lot line when the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot setback. In addition, the Petitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval to construct a porch in the required front yard setback. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the August 13, 2003 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located at the northwest intersection of Lincoln and Hi-Lusi, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. The Subject Property has a typical rectangular shape and the existing home is currently set back approximately 29'10" from the east (front) lot line, 19'6" from the south (exterior) side yard, almost six (6)- feet from the north (side) lot line, and almost 60-feet from the west (rear) lot line. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner would like to add on to the house. The'attached exhibits show the Petitioner's plans for the project, which include constructing an unenclosed porch in the front yard and extending the structure along the south lot line to increase the size of the kitchen and family room on the first floor and creating a master bedroom and larger closet on the second floor. In addition, the plans indicate that a porch would be added onto the rear elevation of the residence. The Petitioner would like to maintain the existing exterior side yard setback, which is 19'6" for six (6) linear feet of the addition. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot setback for new construction; therefore the Petitioner is seeking a Variation in order to add onto the house and maintain the 19'6" setback. Also, the proposed porch would encroach into the required 30-foot front yard and the Petitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval in order to construct the front porch. ' PZ-34-03 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 3 GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The existing home does not comply with zoning regulations. The existing house and garage encroach into the required exterior side yard and setback respectively. However, they are legal nonconforming structures and are allowed to remain in their current locations. The proposed addition to the house requires relief from the RA Bulk Regulations for the exterior side yard setback and the porch requires Conditional Use approval. The addition and porch would be constructed according to all applicable Village Codes. The following table compares the Petitioner's proposal to the 1LA Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. RA Single Family District Existing Proposed Minimum Requirements SETBACKS: Front 30' 29' 11" 25' Interior 5' 5' 11" No change Exterior 20' 19'6" No change Rear 25' 60' No change LOT COVERAGE 50% Maximum 27% 35% VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: ,, A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; · Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and · Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner is proposing to expand the existing home to create additional living space. The Petitioner explored different designs for the addition that would meet the 20-foot exterior side yard. The end result was modification of the rear porch so it complied with the 20-foot setback. However, as stated in the attached application, the Petitioner felt that the 19'6" setback was necessary in order to expand the kitchen and keep it within the same space. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot exterior side yard for the house and the detached garage. However, the existing structures do not meet this requirement and the Petitioner would like to maintain the existing setback for a portion of the proposed addition. The six (6)-inch encroachment is a minor encroachment, but the request fails to meet the standards for a Variation because there is no hardship as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. Also, the Petitioner is creating the need for relief from zoning regulations because the addition could meet the required setback. Z-34-03 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 4 CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 1~4.203,F,8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: · The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The proposed unenclosed porch differs in its design and style from previous unenclosed porches approved by the Village because the house is a stucco clad Spanish style house. However, the proposed unenclosed porch was designed in keeping with the existing structure and would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood, utility provision or public streets and the proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION The Petitioner's request to expand the house and maintain the 19'6" exterior side yard does not meet the Variation standards contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance because the Subject Property is typical of most comer lots in the Village and the addition could be constructed according to zoning regulations. However, the proposed request to construct a porch in the front yard meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny a Variation to allow a 19'6" exterior side yard for the proposed addition (the P&Z's decision is final for this portion of the project), but recommend to the Village Board approval of the Conditional Use to allow an unenclosed front porch as shown on the attached elevation and site plan prepared by Jeffery William Evertt, Architect for the residence at 318 S. Hi-Lusi, Case No. PZ-34-03. The Village Board's decision is final for this portion of the project. I concur: William J.(Cooney, AIC~, Director of Community Development VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 100 S Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval_ ' :.-~i,,;:~.~ Case Number Paz - Development Name/Address Date of Submission Hearing Date ' . . . Addressres)(StreetNumb~r, Street) t'~} ~ ~ ¢'I ["'L.,LJ ~[ :'~,v/-~',,~\ "L[ Site,Ar~,.(Acres) Property Zoning C.~. ¢, Total B.u. ild~g ,~q..Ft. (Site) Setbacks: Front Rear ~ide(,_,~ Side Build~e~_/Height Lot tZoy_erage (%) Number of Parking Spaces Adjacent Land Uses: North South East West Tax I.D. Numi~er or County Assigned Pin Number(s) <>~ It ,3.1 -/ o c:zo :','~"oo o4: Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) Name Telephotos. (day) Co~oration TeleRhon S~eet Address " Fax Interest in Prope~ Name Telephone (day) Corporation Telephone (even,~g) ~i~ State Zip Code Pager '" !.'!~i'""~ I ,", :"> Developer Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Attorney Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Surveyor Name Telephone (day) Address Fax n neer Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Architect ~,~ ~ ~ ..... '"' D~'7 ~t ' , ........ Name ~ .... ~ ....-- Telephone (day): I ~'v"' :::i Fax Addresslc..' ~ ' ' ,*'k ~". ',~ '~.. ~-'"~,, ~ ..... ,,. Landscape Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.mountprospect.org Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 ~'oposed~ Qondj_ti9r~,al Use (as listed in the zqning district) .,~ ..... ,,... ~,~,.~ _.;~,.;,,, ~ '~ .... ' ~', x ~. ~ [ r ~ /,!-~ ~ I ~ ,' ',. '. '' ~. " ~ '~'G~,!' I.,.,-' ~ , , . '.,~ '' ,'~..fi ~,I7;~ii'~i Describe in Detail the BUiid~gs and Activities Pi~6~6~cl ~d H~ ~he' PrOpoSed Use M~e~s th~ A~a~hed standards for Conditional Use Approval (a~ach additional sheets ifnecessa~) Hours of Operation Address(es) (Street Number, S~eet) r~...~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~, , . , Site.Ar~a (Acres) Prope~ Zo~pg Total Build~g Sq Ft (Site) Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use Setbacks: Front c -- Rear Side,., ~, Side ., Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affmn that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to thee best of my kno~l~edgg. i f applicant i~-n'ot p;2perty ~vndr:I - Date I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner Date Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.mountprospect.org Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 ode Section(s) for which Variation(s) is (are) Requested Summary and Justification for Requested Variation(s), Relate Justification to the Attached Standards for Variations Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staffso that materials can be r~viewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affmu that all informatiOn provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to th.c~est of my kno'~led~. If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner Date Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 3 ~ TDD 847.392.6064 Application for Conditional Use Approval and Variation 29 July 2003 Residential Renovation / Addition for the Brouder Residence 318 South Hi-Lusi Avenue Project No. 0302 Full Legal Description: Lot 10 in Block 2 in Prospect Park Country Club Subdivision, being a subdivision of the Southeast ¼ of Section 11 and the South 15.0 acres of the East ~A of the Northeast ¼ of Section 11, being all in Township 41 North, Range 1 t East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois.. Project Scope: The project proposal entails the renovation and mukiple additions to an existing one stow wood framed stucco clad Spanish style single family residence with full basement. The existing residence is approximately 1535 square feet with two first floor bedrooms and a detached two car garage. The project includes: 1. A new first floor 6 foot rear addition full width with full basement to enlarge the existing Kitchen and provide for a new Family Room location. 2. A new 9 foot unenclosed rear concrete porch approximately 30 foot wide with arch openings to co-ordinate with existing front porch and interior details. 3. A new 4 foot 8 inch x 20 foot 4 inch unenclosed front concrete porch with arch openings to co-ordinate with existing front porch and interior details. Front porch to minimize bulk of new second stow addition. 4. A new second stow addition to accommodate four bedrooms, two full baths and a laundry room. Approximately 1800 square feet. To accommodate the above work the following approvals are requested: Conditional Use Approval for a new 20 foot 4 inch wide unenclosed front concrete porch with arch openings projecting a maximum 4 foot 8 ~/~ inches into the required Front Yard Setback. The above foundation porch constructio~ shall be stucco clad masonry and/or wood framed one stow structure with metal reproduction roofing tiles to match the existing clay tile roofing material. The porch structure is intended to minimize the height impact of the new second stow addition and provide for more weather coverage using the front entry. Both the porch and second floor addition improvements should substantially enhance the value of both the residence and surrounding residential properties. The porch scale relates directly to the surrounding single stow residences adjacent to the residence. The porch does not adversely affect the Standards for recommendation for approval. Variation Request to allow the proposed southern portion of 6 foot rear addition to encroach 5 1/4 inches into the required 20 foot Exterior Side Yard Setback to allow the south wall of the two stow addition with full basement to align with the existing south wall of the one story residence. The existing encroachment on the Exterior Side Yard Setback for the South wall varies from 7 1/8 inches at the southeast comer to 5 ¼ inches at the southwest corner. The existing residence's footprint is rotated to the southeast with respect to the setbacks. This specific encroachment request would not be requested except for the existing footprint relationship to the setbacks and the intention to maintain the Kitchen within the same space. To allow the encroachment allows the existing Kitchen space to be extended west with the basic u-shaped cabinet arrangement to be extended west along the south wall. The new rear porch addition has been offset 48 inches to eliminate further encroachment. This' variation request is specific to the existing residence's footprint relationship with no deske for financial gain, no detrimental impact to the surrounding residences and neighbor, and no alteration to the single family environment. The present residence approximate age is over 50 years. Residential Renovation / Addition for the Brouder Residence 318 South Hi- Lusi Avenue L-T T L '0 vwl 9/11103 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 318 SOUTH HI-LUSI AVENUE WHEREAS, Ila and Tim Brouder (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners'~ have filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit, with res pect to property located at 318 South Hi-Lusi Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property'S, and legally described as follows: Lot 10 in Block 2 in Prospect Park Country Club Subdivision, being a subdivision of the SE ¼ of Sec. 11 and the South 15 acres of the East ~ of the NE ¼ of Sec. 11, all in the Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL. Property Index Number: 08-11-217-020-0000 and WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Conditional Use permit to construct an unenclosed porch that would encroach five-feet (5') within the thirty-foot (30') minimum front yard setback as required in Section 14.1003.A of the Mount Prospect Village Code; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit being the subject of PZ-34-03 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of August, 2003, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the MoUnt Prospect Journal on the 13th day of August, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and positive recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-349-03; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. 318 S. Hi-Lusi Avenue Page 2/2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit, as provided for in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code, to allow the construction of an Unenclosed porch that would encroach five-feet (5') into the required thirty-foot (30') front yard setback, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copY of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\CLKO\files\WIN~ORDINANC~Oor~ Use, 318 Hi-Lusi,Sept, 03.doc illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 2003 PZ-35-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY) 1105 S. BEECHWOOD DRIVE ORESTE & FRANCA MAGNELLI - APPLICANTS The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to deny' Case PZ-35-03, a request to construct a circular driveway, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their August 28, 2003 meeting. The Subject Property is located in a single-family residential neighborhood. The proposed circular driveway would cover 33% of the exterior side yard and would require a new curb cut onto Willow Lane. The Zoning Ordinance lists circular driveways as Conditional Uses and requires Village Board approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the fact that at least five vehicles could be parked on the driveway. They noted that in the past, cimular driveways were approved as a means of resolving a traffic or safety issue. In this case, the Petitioner was requesting the circular driveway for convenience reasons. The Planning & Zoning Commission members voted 7-0 to recommend that the Village Board deny a request for a Conditional Use permit to construct a circular driveway at 1105 S. Beechwood Drive, Case No. PZ-35-03. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 16, 2003 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-35-03 PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: PIN #: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Oreste & Franca Magnelli August 13, 2003 1105 S. Beechwood Dr. 08-14-316-009 Conditional Use for a Circular Driveway Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist None William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Cornmunity Development Marisa Wameke, Neighborhood Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Oreste, Franca & Nella Magnelli Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 24 meeting, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The July meeting minutes were approved 7-0. At 7:35, under Old Business, Ms. Juracek said that the Planning & Zoning Commission would not address Case No. PZ-13-03, a Text Amendment for Lighting Regulations, at this meeting. She said that there would be a workshop on September 11, 2003 to discuss this item. At 9:02, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-35-03, a request for a Conditional Use for a circular driveway. Ms. Juracek said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. William Cooney, Director of Community Development, presented the case. He said that the Subject Property is located on the east side of Beechwood Drive, between Willow Lane and Ash Drive, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned R1 Single Family Residence and is bordered by the R1 district on all sides. He said that the existing home on the Subject Property is currently set back slightly more than 30-feet from the west/front lot line and includes a Standard 16' wide driveway. Mr. Cooney said that the Petitioner would like to widen the driveway to 19' and, as part of the project, construct a circular driveway. The proposed circular driveway would measure 10-feet in width and would connect to the standard driveway. He said that the standard driveway and circular driveway, which requires an additional curb cut on to Beechwood Drive, would cover 33% of the front yard. The Petitioner's reasons for requesting a circular driveway relate to the number of drivers they have and the number of vehicles they own. Mr. Cooney said that while the proposed circular driveway would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood, it is not needed as a solution to a traffic safety issue and/or because the street has a substandard fight-of-way or pavement width. He said that the Petitioner's reasons for the circular driveway are for convenience and that the circular drive would cover an amount of the front yard that is not consistent with the adjacent properties. Therefore, the request fails to meet the Conditional Use standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance. He said that based on these findings, Staff recommends that the P&Z recommend that the Village Board to deny a Conditional Use request for a circular driveway for the residence at 1105 Beechwood Drive, Case No. PZ-35-03. He said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. There was general discussion on the proximity of the driver(ay to Willow Lane. Matthew Sledz asked whether there was some type of hardship related to the request. Mr. Cooney replied that no hardships exist at this point. lanning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-35-03 Page'2 Nella Magnelli and Franca Magnelli, 1105 S. Beechwood Drive, were sworn in. Nella Magnelli stated that there are currently four drivers in the household, and that there will be fifth driver in March. She said that there is currently room for four cars on the property, but not enough space to accommodate a fifth vehicle. Franca Magnelli clarified that the driveway is already 19 feet wide. Ms. Juracek stated that circular driveways are not usually characteristic of the Village. She said that they are installed to solve or minimize a traffic or safety issues or if the homeowner agrees not to park the cars there overnight. Mr. Sledz agreed and said that this is a self-imposed hardship stemming from the number of vehicles. He said that if this request were approved, that one parking option would be traded for another. Chairman Juracek closed the public hearing at 9:12. There was general discussion on circular driveways that currently exist in the Village. Mr. Cooney said that Staff had reviewed some driveways on the list of circular driveways that the Petitioner submitted and found that many were constructed before the ordinance was changed to require Conditional Use approval. Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend that the Village Board approve the Conditional Use request for the circular driveway at 1105 S. Beechwood Drive for Case No. PZ-35-03. Men-ill Cotten seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES! None NAYS: Floros, Cotten, Donnetly, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and jUracek Motion was denied 7-0. Ms. Juracek reminded the Petitioner that the Village Board would need supermajority to approve the request due to the negative recommendation. At 9:17 p.m, Joseph Donnelley made motion to adjourn, seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Ivfarisa Wameke, Neighborhood Planner D~irl2 ~ o~ Jo' f~ 2C°o°nnu~t~ n~ It y D'evelopment H:\PLAN~Plannlng & Zoning COMM~P&Z 2003'~MinutesLPZ-35-03 1105 S Beechwood Drive - circular driveway do~ Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 35 -03 LOCATION: PETITIONERS: OWNERS: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 1105 S. Beechwood Drive Oreste & Franca Magnelli Oreste & Franca Magnelli 08-14-316-009-0000 0.26 acres (11,280 square feet) R1 Single Family Residence Single Family Residential Conditional Use - Circular Driveway LOCATION MAP Ash Drive Willow L~e Frost Drive 1401 12G~ 1407 1316 1411 1402 1419 1416 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2002 HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2002 SUBJECT: PZ-35-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (CIRCULAR DRIVE) 1105 BEECHWOOD DRIVE (ORESTE RESDENCE) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 28, 2003 Planning& Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Oreste & Franca Magnelli (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 1105 Beechwood Drive (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has requested Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a new circular driveway. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the August 13, 2003 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250- feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the east side of Beechwood Drive, between Willow Lane and Ash Drive, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is z0ned R1 Single Family Residence and is bordered by the RI district on all sides. The existing home on the Subject Property is currently set back slightly more than 30-feet from the west lot line (front yard) and inc!udes a standard, 16' wide driveway. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The attached exhibits indicate that the Petitioner would like to widen the driveway to 19' and as part of this project, construct a circular driveway. The proposed circular driveway measures 10-fee; wide and would connect to the standard driveway. The standard driveway and circular driveway (which requires an additional curb cut on to Beechwood Drive) would cover 33% of the front yard. The Street has a standard curb and gutter configuration. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE As previously noted, the existing home complies with the Village's zoning regulations. The table on the following page compares the Petitioner's proposal to the bulk requirements of the RI Single Family Residence district. Z-35-03 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 3 RI Single Family Existing Proposed District Requirements MINIMUM SETBACKS Front 30' 30' No Change Interior 10' or 10% of lot width 17.4' No Change Exterior 20' No Change Rear 25' 35' No Change LOT COVERAGE 45% 27% 29% CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The circular drive is listed as a Conditional Use in the parking section of the Zoning Ordinance (Sec. 14.2215.A. 1). The following list is a summary of these findings: · The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. As with other requests for circular driveways, Staff evaluated traffic patterns in the neighborhood of the Subject PrOperty. In this case, Staff did not find that a circular driveway is needed to resolve a traffic or safety issue. A site visit confirmed that the proposed circular driveway would not be consistent with the character of the neighborhood since it would require more pavement in the exterior side yard than is characteristic of other adjacent properties. In addition, the Petitioner's reasons for requesting a circular driveway relate to the number of vehicles they own. RECOMMENDATION While the proposed circular driveway would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood, it is not needed as a solution to a traffic safety issue and/or because the street has a substandard right-of-way or pavement width. The Petitioner's reasons for the circular driveway are for convenience and the circular drive would cover an amount of the front yard that is not consistent with the adjacent properties. Therefore, the request fails to meet the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the P&Z make a recommendation to the Village Board to deny a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the residence at 1105 Beechwood Drive, Case No. PZ-35-03. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r- planning Division 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval Case Number P&Z Development Name/Address Date of Submission I leafing Date Address(es) (Street Number, Street) Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Site Area (Acres) PropertyZoning Setbacks: Front I Rear ~ :Side B ~ Side Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces A~iacent Land Uses: North South East West Tax 1.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s) Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) Name c Telephone (day) Corporation ' ~ Telephone (evening) Street Address Fax City ~ State Zip Code Pager Interest in Prope~y Name '-- Telephone (~lay) -- Corporation Telephone (evening) Street Address Fax: City State Zip Code Pager Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Attorney Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Surveyor Name Telephone (day) Engineer Telephone Nmne (day) Address } Fax Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax Landscape Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect lllinois wwxv.mountprospect.org Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.532c~ TDD 847.392.606,4 roposed Conditional Use (as listed in tile zoning district) -Describe in Detail tile Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets die Attached Standards for Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessa~.') H ours o f Operation Addr~(es) (Street Number, Street) Site Area (Acres) PropmXy Zoning [ Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Dgvoted to Proposed Use Setbacks: Front Rear ~ Side Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. lncmnplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with tbe appropriate Village staffso that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the iafonnation contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the properly. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided berein and in all materials submitted iii association with this application are true and accurate t° tile best of my k~edge. If applicaut is not property own I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supportin/, material. -~ ! Property Owner ,it ,/~,- . 't ~,.--, ,, ,, Date ( ~J~ Mount Prospect Departnlellt ofCommumty Deve. fopment Phone 847.818.5328 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 3 TDD 847.392.6064 With four drivers and four cars, it is very difficult to maneuver around our two car Garage. To get one car out of the garage, two others must be moved first. Come spring, there wilt be a fifth driver and another car to park on our property. According to city laws we can not block the sidewalks nor park on the street past 2AM. We feel that a circular driveway would solve all of our problems. While two cars are parked in the garage, the others can park on the driveway extension. In this case, each car is easily accessible. This type of driveway is not only practical, but it is also an investment This project will not only increase the property value of our house but beautify the scenery in our intimate Mount Prospect area. Enclosed is a list of other houses in the surroundings area that have this type of driveway. Other Houses In The Neighborhood ~Cfith The Desired Driveway 705 Golf Rd. 709 Golf Rd. 1050 Linneman 685 Bellaire 1100 Church 1103 Church 1026 Church 1012 Church 903 Palm 902 Willow 906 Willow 908 Willow 909 Willow 11 O0 Cypress , eb MapPing Properties that have circular driveways 8/I 9/2003 ot 30 in Windsor Estates being a subdLvislon of part of the West 1/2 of Section Ih, Township North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal F]eridian, in the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois. Sorv~ brought up to date to show ali improvements on /,/~ot.<~- Zo:"~9?/' ~U~ ~ c~3~: vwl 9/10/03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1105 SOUTH BEECHWOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, Oreste and Franca Magnelli (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respect to proPerty located at 1105 South Beechwood Drive (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property'~ and legally described as follows: Lot 30 in Windsor Estates being a subdivision of part of the west ~ of Sec. 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, east of the Third Principal Meridian, in the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, IL. Property Index Number: 08-14-316-009-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Conditional Use permit to construct a circular driveway; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit, being the subject of PZ-35-03, before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28~" day of August, 2003, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal on the 13th day of August, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning commissi0n has submitted its findings and negative recommendation to the President and Board 0f TruStees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD ©F TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit, as provided for in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code, to allow the construction of a circular driveway, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\CLKO\files\WIN\ORDINANC\Con Use,Circular dP~vy, 1105 Beechwood,Sepl,03.doc illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 12, 2003 PZ-25-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (PARKING LOT) & VARIATIONS (SETBACK) 115 S. PINE STREET VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - APPLICANT The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-25-03, a request for a parking lot and relief from setback regulations, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their August 28, 2003 meeting. The Subject Property is located south of the Prospect Avenue commercial area and adjacent to a single-family residential neighborhood. The proposed parking lot would encroach into the required front yard, which requires relief from zoning bulk regulations. In addition, parking lots are Conditional Uses in the B5 Zoning District, which requires Village Board approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the proposed landscape plan, lighting, and the manner in which stormwater would drain from the site. The Planning & Zoning Commission members voted 7-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve a request for Variations and a Conditional Use permit for the construction of a parking lot with the condition that Engineering review the drainage plan for the property at 115 S. Pine Street, Case No. PZ-25-03. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 16, 2003 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-25-03 Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson St. PUBLICATION DATE: July 9, 2003 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 115 S. Pine St. PIN #: 08-12-113-013 REQUEST: Conditional Use for a parking lot and Variations for setbacks MEMBERS PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development Marisa Wameke, Neighborhood Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Elizabeth Burke Kathleen Jenson Mary Ann & Steve Wilkinson Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Joseph Donnelly made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 24 meeting, seconded by Richard Rogers. The July meeting minutes were approved 7-0. At 7:35, under Old Business, Ms. Juracek said that the Planning & Zoning Commission would not address Case No. PZ-13-03, a Text Amendment for Lighting Regulations, at this meeting. She said that there would be a workshop on September 11, 2003 to discuss this item. Ms. Juracek then introduced Case No. PZ-25-03, a request for a Conditional Use to construct a parking lot and Variations for encroachments in required setbacks at 115 S. Pine Street. She said that the Village Board's decision would be final for this case. William Cooney, Director of Community Development, presented the case. He said that at the last Planning & Zoning meeting, the Commission asked Staff to review the proposed landscape plan and present a more detailed landscape plan. He presented the detailed landscape plan and said that it includes adding new species as well as creating a landscape island along the Pine Street right-of-way. Mr. Cooney said that the Subject Property is zoned B5 Central Commercial and is bordered to the north and east by the B5 District and to the west and south by the RA District. Mr. Cooney reported that no lighting was involved in this project for two reasons. First, there is currently lighting on Pine Street and in the back of the commercial properties immediately north of the subject property. Second, the proposed location is currently adjacent to a Single-Family Residential neighborhood, and Staff wanted to avoid the negative impact that the lighting may have on the properties on Pine Street. Mr. Cooney explained that the Planning & Zoning Commission could approve the parking lot with the condition that lighting be added. Mr. Cooney said that the proposed parking lot meets the Conditional Use and Variation standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a lanning & Zoning Commission PZ-25-03 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use and setback Variation for a parking lot for the property located at 115 S. Pine Street, Case No. PZ-25-03. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. Ms. Juracek asked whether the Commissioners had any questions for Staff. There was discussion regarding whether the landscape plan could be more of a park-like setting. Mr. Cooney said that property is more conducive to greenspace rather than a park. The purpose of the landscape plan is to screen the parking lot from the residents. Mr. Cooney suggested that the Planning & Zoning Commission could require additional trees if they felt it would be appropriate. Ms. Juracek asked what improvements had been made to the drainage plan. She said that when the case was initially presented at the July 24, 2003 meeting, residents presented their concerns regarding the standing water that freezes over. Mr. Cooney assured the Planning & Zoning Comm/ssion that Staff would address this issue as part of the design. Kathleen Jenson, 118 S. Pine Street, was sworn in. She asked for assurance that there would be no overnight parking on the property. Mr. Cooney concurred that there would be no overnight parking, He said that this would be insured by the fact that this property is a Village-owned lot, which would be leased to the commercial tenants to be used for employee parking only. Ms. Jenson also presented a concern regarding standing water on the sidewalk, grass, and street. Keith Youngquist said that the curb will help the situation unless there are elevation problems. Mr. Cooney agreed that Staff will review the drainage issue to avoid a trip hazard. At 7:44, MS. Juracek closed the public hearing. Keith Youngquist made a motion to recommend approval to the Village Board of a Conditional Use for a parking lot and Variations for setbacks for the property at 115 S. Pine Street, Case No. PZ-25-03 as proposed by Staff, with the condition that Engineering review the drainage plan. Leo Floros seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Cotten, Donnelly, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek Motion was approved 7-0. NAYS: None At 9:17 p~m, Joseph Donnelley made motion to adjourn, seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. ./ _ Marisa Warneke, Neighborhood Planner ~elopment H:~PLANSPlanning & Zoning COMM~P&Z 20~}3\MinutcsXPZ-2$-03 115 S. Pine S~ - revised plan Aug mtg.doc Village of Mount prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 25-03 LOCATION: PETITIONER: OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 115 S. Pine Street Village of Mount Prospect Village of Mount Prospect 08-12-t 13-013-0000 0.21 acres (9,056 square feet) B5 Central Commercial Vacant Lot Conditional Use & Variation - Parking Lot LOCATION MAP 109 108 111 110 I1] IIZ 115 114 117 116 119 115 121 120 123 122 203 202 205 204 207 20~ 209 208 211 210 213 212 215 214 217 216 219 218 221 220 22~ 222 200 205 204 207 206 209 208 210 213 212 21~ 214 217 216 219 221 220 200 : 205 212 214 2Il 216 213 218 215 220 217 222 219 224 221 226 Milburn Avenue Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER AUGUST 21, 2003 AUGUST 28, 2003 PZ-25-03 - CONDITIONAL USE & VARIATION (PARKING LOT) 115 S. PINE STREET (VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 28, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by the Village of Mount Prospect (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 115 S. Pine Street (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has requested a Variation and Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a parking lot. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the July 9, 2003 edition of the Journal Topics. Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250- feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the east side of Pine Street, between Prospect and Evergreen Avenues, and is an unimproved vacant lot. The Subject Property is zoned B5 Central Commercial and is bordered to the north and east by the B5 District and to the west and south by the RA District. An existing Village owned parking lot (which has access from Wille Street) is located to the east of the property. The Subject Property has an irregular shape (triangular) and abuts an existing alley located directly to the north. The Subject Property currently contains a gravel area (located just south of the existing alley) that is utilized for parking. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL As you may recall, the Commission initially reviewed the request at the July 24th P&Z meeting. The Commission voted to continue the case in order to allow Stafftime to address concerns regarding the following issues: 1) Adding trees to the landscape plan; 2) Explore designs to alleviate the water/flooding problems residents currently encounter; 3) Prohibit overnight parking; 4) That the lease reflect oversize truck restrictions; 5) Modify the site plan so the parking spaces are shifted 10-feet east. The attached exhibits indicate that the parking lot has been modified since the Commission last reviewed the proposal. The location of the parking stalls has been modified so there is now a ten (10)-foot setback from the north (front) property line and the number of parking spaces has been reduced from 12 to 11. In addition, the Village Forester has prepared a landscape plan that indicates the parking lot will be screened from the adjacent residential neighborhood using a variety of plantings (including trees, shrubs, and flowers). PZ-25-03 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 3 The final stormwater design has not been completed, but the Engineering Division stated that the parking lot would drain to the alley where water would then go into the street drainage system. In addition, the barrier curb that will be installed around the edge of the parking lot will prevent water from traveling south, onto the adjacent residential property. At this time, the Village does not have any plans to restrict they type of vehicles that may park in the leased stalls. However, the over-night parking ban will be enforced by the Police Department and commuters cannot lease the parking spaces. As part of the lease-signing process, employers and their employees will have to present proof of employment, driver's license and plate numbers. Installing parking lot lights was another issue raised at the July meeting. It has since been clarified .that the Village does not intend to install parking lot lights. This decision is not only due to fiscal reasons, but also because the parking lot is accessed from an alley. It has been Village policy to not install lights specifically for parking lots that are accessible from streets and alleys. The proposed pine Street parking lot is in keeping with the Village policy and therefore, lights will not be installed at this time. The property is located in the B5 District, which is a zoning district that does not typically require setbacks. However, Sec. 14.1905.B the Zoning Ordinance contains provisions for a front setback When 40% of the block has an established setback. In this case, the proposed parking lot would be located on the same block as single- family residences that have a 30-foot front yard setback. Since the Village proposes a one-foot setback, the parking lot's front setback requires relief from the zoning regulations. Therefore, the Village is seeking a Variation for the front yard setback in order to provide the maximum amount of employee parking in a location that w~uJd have a _min__imal impact on the adjacent single-family residences. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The existing vacant lot does not have established setbacks. proposal to the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The following table compares the Petitioner's B5 Central Commercial District Minimum Requirements Existing Proposed SETBACKS: Front (west) 30' Vacant lot 10' Interior (east) No regulations Vacant lot 55' Rear (south) No resulations Vacant lot 19' LOT COVERAGE No regulations Vacant lot 27% CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: · The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and Z-25-03 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting August 28, 2003 Page 4 · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The proposed parking lot was designed in a manner that would create minimal impact on the adjacent residential properties. The increased landscaping will screen the parking lot from the residential neighborhood and the parking lot would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood, utility provision or public streets. Also, the improvements will help eliminate a flooding situation one of the adjacent properties currently experiences. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation ar~ listed in~ Se.ction !4.203,C...9 of th~yi!!age Zoning Ordinance and include'Seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: · A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; · Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and · Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner proposes to locate the parking lot ten (10)-feet from the west (front) lot line in order to provide the maximum number of parking spaces while also trying~;o~_minimize the potential impacts on the adjacent properties. The 30-foot setback requirement applies to the proposed parking lot because it would be the primary structure on the lot and the properties to the south of the Subject Property have an established 30-foot setback. The irregular shape of the lot and its location (accessed from an alley) are unique conditions. The proposed parking configuration/location is consistent with the existing gravel/parking area on the property. The site plan was modified to create a ten (10)-foot buffer and the number of parking stalls was reduced to ensure that the design of the parking lot would preserve the neighborhood character, improve the property's existing condition (by providing screening and curb and gutter), and free up additional on-street parking spaces within the area. Therefore, the request meets the standards for a Variation. RECOMMENDATION: The proposed parking lot meets the Conditional Use and Variation standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, staff rec°mtnends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use a. nd se~tbgck 5Z~riation for a parking lot for the property located at 1 I5 S. Pine Street, Case No. PZ-25-03. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William JJ Cooney, ABZP, Director of Community Development ~ ;::/Pine Street ..."": :::-.:i' ." Willo vwl 9/9/03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 115 SOUTH PINE STREET WHEREAS, The Village of Mount Prospect (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner~ has filed a petition for a Variation and a Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 115 South Pine Street, (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property'~ and legally described as follows: Lot 27 in Busse's Resubdivision of Lots 1 to 6 inclusive of the Resubdivision of Lots 1 to 6 inclusive in Block 4; also of lots 2 and 3 in Block 5, all of Block 6; Lots 13 to 24 inclusive in Block 7; Lots 17 to 20 in Block 8; all in Meiers Addition to Mount Prospect, a subdivision in the northwest ¼ of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL. Property Index Number(s): 08-12-113-013-0000 and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit for the construction of a parking lot in the B-5 (Central Commercial) Zoning District, as provided in Section 14.1904 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation from the Village Zoning Code to allow a parking lot to encroach twenty-nine feet (29') within the thirty-foot minimum front yard setback as required in Section 14.1905.B of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use and Variations being the subject of PZ-25-03 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount ProsPect on the 28th of August, 2003, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal on the 9th of July, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and positive recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the requests being the subject of PZ-25-03; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit and Variations would be in the best interest of the Village. 1 15 S. Pine Street Page 212 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit for the construction of a parking lot in the B-5 (Central Commercial) Zoning District, as provided in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code; and SECTION THREE: Prior to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use permit, the following condition shall be fulfilled: Village of Mount Prospect Engineering staff shall review the drainage plan for the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation from the Village Zoning Code to allow a parking lot to encroach twenty-nine feet (29') within the thirty-foot minimum front yard setback as required in Section 14.1905.B of the Village Code. SECTION FIVE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley, Village President Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk H:kCLKO\fi!es\WIN\ORDINANC\Co~UseoV~,r,115 Pine.park lot. SepL03.doc vwi 8/28/03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN BERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, it has been determined that it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain the personal property specified herein; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that the best interests of the Village would be served by the sale of the personal property at a public auction conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference, which auction will be held on Saturday, October 11,2003 at 11:00 A.M. at the Mount Prospect Public Works Facility, 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 65 5/11-76-4 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the items of personal property listed on the attached, which are owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, are no longer useful or necessary to the Village and that the best interests of the Village will be served by selling said personal property at a public auction being the subject of this Ordinance, to the highest bidder. SECTION TWO: The Northwest Municipal Conference shall conduct a public auction on Saturday, October 11, 2003 at 11:00 A.M. at the Mount Prospect Public Works Facility, 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Anyone interested may view the personal property at this location and date between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. SECTION THREE: The Northwest Municipal Conference will cause a public notice informing the general public of this public auction to be published in a newspaper of general circulation. SECTION FOUR: No bid shall be accepted for the sale of any item which is less than the minimum value set forth on the attached list, unless the Village Manager or the designee of the Village Manager so authorizes at the time of the auction. Vehicle auction Page 2/3 SECTION FIVE: Within ten (10) days after the successful bid is accepted, the successful bidder shall tender to the Village of Mount Prospect the consideration specified in the bid accepted and upon receipt of such consideration, the Village Manager is hereby authorized to transfer title of said personal property to the successful bidder. SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\CLKO\flles\WINiORDtNANC\PW AUCTION, Oct 2003.doc Auction Page 3 of 3 W//age I.D. V.I.N. ITEMS TO BE PLACED FOR AUCTION OCTOBER 11,2003 MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Year/Make/Model Type Minimum Price 2724A 2727A 2735A 2745A 2762A 4565A 304A 306A 307A 308A 313A 317A P- 14A P- 19A P-13A P-16A S-32A 500A 501A 502A 503A I FDPK84N6EVA24693 2HTAA1954DHA15751 1 GBJV34M6HJ 163282 1GNCS13W1T2165696 40LUB1223NP015536 1G1BL52P1TR144933 1FASP15J9SW21 I408 1FASPI 5JOSW211409 1G 1BL52P1 TR145323 1 GKCM15Z8JB535084 1G 1 BL52P4TR145204 1 G1BL52P9SR187012 2FAFP71W11X161578 2FAFP71 W31 X161579 1GNEC13R1VJ370931 1GNEC13RXVJ371303 1 G1 BL52 POSR187254 1G1BL53P1SR168731 1 G1BL52P3SR168133 1 G 1 BL52P8SR169097 1G 1 BL52P7SR167633 1984 Ford F800 Truck 1983 International 1954 Truck 1987 Chevrolet V3500 Truck 1996 Chevrolet Blazer Truck 1992 Pace America Trailer 1996 Chevrolet Caprice Car 1995 Ford Escort Car 1995 Ford Escort Car 1996 Chevrolet Caprice Car 1988 GMC Safari Van 1996 Chevrolet Caprice Car 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Car 2001 Ford Crown Vic Car 2001 Ford Crown Vic Car 1997 Chevrolet Tahoe Truck 1997 Chevrolet Tahoe Truck 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Car 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Car 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Car 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Car 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Car X:\Administration\ORGANIZE\NWMC\2003 Auction Vehicles.doc $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 2oo.oo $ 200.00 $ 100.00 $ 2OO.OO $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 2OO.OO $ 2O0.0O $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $3,500.00 $3,5OO.OO $ 200.00 $ 20o.oo $ 200,00 $ 200.00 $ 200,00 $ 2O0.O0 $ 200.00 illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER WILLIAM J. COONEY, DIRECTOR SEPTEMBER 5, 2003 COMMUNITY RELATIONS COMMISSION - CDBG 2004 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS The Village's Community Relations Commission (CRC) transmits their recommendation to approve the Village of Mount Prospecfs 2004 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Attached please find a spreadsheet outlining the CRC's funding recommendations for 2004. The Action Plan addresses affordable housing and service needs within the Village of Mount Prospect and is consistent with the Five Year Consolidated Plan approved by HUD in program year 2000. On August 21, 2003, the CRC held a Public Hearing regarding the 2004 CDBG budget. The hearing allowed each organization to present their 2004 budget request and provided an opportunity for citizen participation. The Community Development Department did not receive any comments or suggestions from residents regarding the Village's 2004 funding recommendations. On September 4, 2003, the CRC held a meeting to discuss the various funding requests and made a final budget recommendation to the Board of Trustees (as outlined in the attached table). To assist in your review of this issue I have attached a copy of the meeting minutes from the August 21st Public Hearing and September 4th CRC meeting, Please forward this memorandum and attachment to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 16t~* meeting. Staffwilt be present at that meeting to answer an3, questions related to the matter. William J. toon&37, AI{~I~ H kPLAN\CDBG~2004\Action Plan\CRC Budget Recs Memo to %'~ doc T 2004 CDBG BUDGET FY 2004 FY 2004 CRC Applicant Budget Budget Budget Projects Account # Recommendations Request FY 2003 FY 2002 FY 2001 Administration (VOMP) $65,000 $65,000 $50,00{~ $50,000 $25,000 Public Service, Prog[ams il, Access To Care 0702305-540270 13,000 12,000 11,00£ 9,00( 9,00{ L Camp Fire - CAMPIN' KiDS 0702305-540260 t2,000 20,000 11,05£ 8,00C 10,00£ 3. CEDA- Child Care n/a 4,000 6,250 n/s n/~ n/~ ~,. CEDA- Emergency Housing n/a 6,000 10,000 n/a n/~ n/~ 5. CEDA-Transitional Housing 0702305-540245 0 0 5,00£ 2,000 8,25( S; Children's Advocacy Center 0702305-540266 4,500 4,500 3,00¢ 3,00~ 1 ?. Clayground ceramics Program 0702305-540216 6,000 10,000 6,00¢ 6,000 4,00( ii. Club Rec Plex Program 0702305-540220 2,000 3,000 2,50C 3,00( 3,00~ ii. Fellowship Housing Corporation n/a 0 8,700 n/~ n/a! nit 10. Gid Scouts Program 0702305-540223 4'1000 5,000 2,50C 2,5001 1¶, Journey's from PADS to HOPE 0702305-540219 5,500 5,000 4,000 2,500 t2. Mentor Program 0702305-54027~1 3,000 3,000 3,00C 3,000 3,00¢ !.3.. RCE - Senior Shared Housing Program 0702305~.540265 3,000 3,500 3,00C 2,00(~ 2,50C $4. Resources for Community Living 0702305-540272 6,000 7,000 5,00(; 2,50C 2,50g 1'5. Special Leisure Services Foundation 0702305-540283 2,500 5,000 2,000 n/~ n/~ 16. Summer Adventure Program 0702305-540217 14,000 15,000 12,00C 11 ?00 7,000 17. WINGS n/a 3,000 5,000 n/a n/~ n/~ Low/Moderate Projects tS. Orchard,Millage Rehab n/a 20,000 20,000 n/a n/~ n/~ 19. First Time Homebuyer's Program 0702306-540282 20,000 20,000 20,00G n/~ n/~ 20. Single Family Rehab & Weatherization 0702306-590200 188,500 188,000 236,95g 160,036~ 177,60g 2¶. Emergency Repair Program nla 30,000 30,000 n/a n/~ n/~ Z2. Sidewalk Ramp Project 07'02306-640009 55,000 55,000 50,000 92,111 100,000 23. Sidewalk Trip Hazard Elimination 0702306-690010 65,000 65,000 65,000 60,00(~ ~ SUB.TOTAL ~ .~ . ,378,500.~..:. ,.. ?.., '.~ .,;,,~'.~ ....,..~ .... -- __ ..... ..,;.....-... ".? $371,950 ,"~:~; 252,147 .';~: .-~ 337,80n ..... ~: ..'~ .~" $492,00(3. :,'~ $357,34; ;stimated/Actual CDBG Allocation *$467,000 487,000 363,000 366,00(; EStimated/Actual program Income *65,000 '127,782 34,91.c 64153~ ~DBG Carryover Funds $0 110,506 423,674 741,77¢ ......... ............. Ngtes: 1. Mount Prospect's estimated CDBG allocation for FY 2004 is $467,000 2. Mount Prospect's estimated Program Income for FY 2004 is $65,000 3. The maximum allowed by HUD for administration is $93,400 (20%). 4. The maximum public service expenditure allowed by HUD is $89,217.30 (15% plus 15% of previous year's program income). 5. Program Income is generated from repayment of outstanding 0% Interest Loans 6. Numbers with * are subject to change. MINUTES COMMUNITY RELATIONS COMMISSION Mount Prospect Village Hall - 100 S. Emerson Street Thursday, August 21, 2003 7:00 p.m. The meeting of the Corranunity Relations Commission (CRC) of the Village of Mount Prospect was held on Thursday, August 21,2003 at the Mount Prospect Village Hall, 100 S. Emerson St., Mount Prospect, Illinois. CALL TO ORDER Chairman John Brennan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Commissioners Barbara Muench, Judi Muniz, Pankaj Parikh and Anthony Tolbert were present. The Village staff present were Michael Jacobs, Deputy Director of the Community Development Department, Marisa Wameke, Neighborhood Planner, and Lisa Angell, Staff Liaison. OLD BUSINESS There were no Old Business items to discuss. NEW BUSINESS Public Hearing for FY 2004 CDBG reques.~s Michael Jacobs briefly summarized the intent of the public hearing and reviewed the various materials that had been provided to the CRC members by Staff. Mr. Jacobs noted that the meeting was intended solely as an opportunity for the applicants to review their various programs and related funding requests, and that no final funding recommendations would occur at the conclusion of the hearing. Chairman Brennan outlined to those in the audience how the Public Hearing would proceed with regards to reviewing the 2004 Budget for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. He asked that ail applicants for the CDBG program sign in and noted that he would call on them in the order they had signed in to make their presentation. He requested that their presentation be no longer than five minutes, which would then be followed by a question and answer period by the Commission. He advised them that the Commission would take all the comments and questions into consideration and then meet on September 4th to prepare their final budget recommendations to the Village's Board of Trustees. Chairman Brennan then asked that representatives from the Village of Mount Prospect's Human Services Department come forward to make a presentation. The representative indicated that the Village's Human Services Department operates two different programs, the Summer Adventure Program and the Mentor Program. The requested budget amount for the Summer Adventure Program was $15,000 and the requested amount for the Mentor Program was $3,000. Both programs are targeted to meet the needs of low-income at- risk children within the Village. The next presentation was for the Clayground Professional Art Studio, a Division of the River Trails Park District. This program provides youth programs for low-income children. Because the facility is now a division of the River Trails Park District, labor is provided to the studio. They requested $10,000 in funding for 2004. They would like the additional funding to be used to reach children on the South side of Mount Prospect. The third presentation was for the Access to Care Program, which provides healthcare to the low-income residents of Mount Prospect. There are currently 203 Mount Prospect residents on the waiting list for the program. Access To Care requested $12,000 to assist Mount Prospect residents. The next presentation was from the Children's Advocacy Center. Their request was for $4,500. The Center Community Relations Commission August 21, 2003 Minutes Page 2 provides crisis intervention following a report of child abuse, counseling, child interviews, court advocacy and other supportive services to sexually abused children and their families. They reported an increase in cases from last year. The next presentation was by a representative of Journeys from Pads to Hope. The Pads to Hope Program provides showers, washing facilities, a food pantry, a clothing pantry, and emergency shelters from October to May for the homeless. Their funding request for 2004 was $5,000. The next presentation was regarding Camp Fire - Campin' Kids. This program provides a summer day camp for children from the Boxwood area 5 days per week. This year only 10 of the 77 children in the program paid the full tuition for the summer. Their budget request for this year was $20,000, and they would like to hire a Spanish-speaking counselor to enhance communication with some of the children. The next presentation was for Resources for Community Living. Resources For Community Living provides supportive services to adults with developmental and/or physical disabilities. These services include everything from balancing a checkbook, to participating in social groups, to finding affordable housing. This program requested $7,000 for the 2004 fiscal year. The next presentation was from the Mt. Prospect Park District's Club RecPlex facility~ Their request for $3,000 is used for the Friday night Youth Program that they offer at the RecPlex. The Park District primarily funds this program, with the remaining funding provided through the CDBG program. The next presentation was for the Girl Scouts Program and the funding request is targeted towards assisting Hispanic girls. They indicated that their research shows that Hispanic girls are the most underserved. The program's funding request for FY 2004 was $5,000. They are hoping to serve at least 125 Hispanic girls with the 2004 funding. The next presentation was for the Special Leisure Services Foundation. Theyrequested $5,000 for 2004. This program covers the additional costs for a disabled individual to participate in park district programs with their non-disabled peers. The next presentation was from a representative of Resource Center for the Elderly. Resource Center for the Elderly provides an Elderly Shared Housing Program by matching up an elderly person with a low-income person who can't afford to live on his,qqer own. Their funding request for 2004 was $3,500. The next presentation was by CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center. CEDA provides services for transitional housing. Their request actually contained two components: one was the Emergency Housing Program with a funding request of $10,000; and the second was $6,250 for the Child Care Subsidy Program. The Emergency Housing Program provides both prevention and transitional housing. The Child Care Subsidy Program provides subsidies to parents who need to place their children in day care so they can work full-time. The next presentation was from the Fellowship Housing Corporation. This program provides housing services to low-income single mothers and currently has 24 apartment units housing a total of 80 family members. However, they currently do not serve anyone from Mount Prospect. Their 2004 funding request was for $8,700. ommunity Relations Commission August 21, 2003 Minutes Page 3 The next presentation was from Orchard Village who requested funds for the rehabilitation of a single-family home the program currently owns. Five disabled men have been living in the home for the past 5 years. Funds would be used to replace flooring, repair the garage, replace siding and replace dilapidated handicapped ramps. The program requested $20,000 in funding. It was noted that this request for funding is a separate line item from the Public Service Programs' funding. The last presentation was from a representative of WINGS. This program provides assistance to women who are victims of domestic violence. There is currently one family living at the parsonage at the Lutheran Church of Mary and Martha in Mount Prospect. This program requested $5,000 in funding. Chairman Brennan closed the public hearing after att members in the audience had the opportunity to comment on the subject. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was closed at 9:30 p.m. Res, l:qctfully submiIJ~ed, /~ Michael W. Jacobs, AICP Deputy Director of Co--unity Development H:\PLAN\CDBG~2004~,CRC August 21, 2003 Public Hearing Minutes.doc MINUTES COMMUNITY RELATIONS COMMISSION 2ND Floor Conference Room, Public Safety Building Thursday, September 4, 2003 7:00 p.m. The meeting of the Community Relations Commission (CRC) of the Village of Mount Prospect was held Thursday, September 4, 2003 in the 2nd floor conference room of the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Brennan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioner Muniz Commissioner Parikh Commissioner Tolbert Commissioner Muench (arrived at 7:10 p.m.) Mike Jacobs, Deputy Director of Community Development Marisa Warneke, Neighborhood Planner Lisa Angell, Staff Liaison APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion to approve the August 7th , 2003 meeting minutes was moved and seconded. The minutes were unanimously approved as written. [As a point of clarification Chairman Brennan stated that although the Forum on Racism and Diversity would not be conducted in Spanish bi-lingual individuals will be present to assist with translation as needed, and participants will be asked to speak slowly and clearly.] A motion to approve the minutes from the August 21st Special Meeting was moved and seconded. The minutes were unanimously approved as written. OLD BUSINESS Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funding Discussion and Recommendations [2004 CDBG applicants presented their funding requests to the Community Relations Commission at the August 21, 2003 Public Hearing.] The final phase of the recommendation process for 2004 CDBG funds was conducted. Following a general overview of each funding applicant, the Commission members discussed and made their respective · recommendations for allocating funds to the 2004 CDBG applicants. As all applicants were recognized for their respective service, the Commission focused on the following criteria in making their recommendations. (1) Number of Mount Prospect residents served (2) Applicant's operating budget (3) Applicant's funding source(s) The Commission discussed each applicants request until a consensus for funding was reached. The attached 2004 Budget document details the final recommendations of the Community Relations Commission. To enhance the recommendation process Commissioner Parikh suggested that in the future Commission members be assigned specific funding applicants. Each Commissioner would be responsible for reviewing designated applications, conducting the questions at the Pubic Hearing, and if appropriate making a site visit. Several Commissioners commented on the merits of Commissioner Padkh's suggestion. NEW BUSINESS Commissioner Muniz informed the Commission that she would be resigning from the Commission. Commissioner Muniz took a job with the Mount Prospect Police Department which starts in mid-September. Commissioner Muniz expressed her thanks for having the opportunity to be on the Commission. The other Commission members thanked for her work and wished her well, Chairman Brennan encouraged the Commissioners to participate in and promote the September 21, 20003 Diversity Walk. The event is from 2:00 p.m. until 4:00 p.m. The walk begins in Arlington Heights and ends with festivities at Meadows Park. Chairman Brennan gave an update on registration for the Forum on Racism and Diversity. He anticipates 35 to 40 participants. The staff liaison repoded on the individuals signed up through the Village. The staff liaison informed the Commission of the October Welcome New Residents event. She witl confirm the date and location in writing to them prior to the event. .OTHER Mike Jacobs, Deputy Director of Community Development thanked the Commission for the care and effort they took in making the 2004 CDBG funding recommendations. He also made them aware of the shift in Administrative costs to the 2004 CDBG budget. ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting was scheduled for Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in the second floor conference room of Village Hall. There being no further business a motion to adjourn was moved and seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 8:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, M. Lisa Angell Staff Liaison X:\USERS\LANGELL\communityrelationscomm~ssion2003~sept meelingminutes.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2004 ACTION PLAN INCLUDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has prepared a five-year Consolidated Plan, which includes a community development strategic plan as well as an application for a Community Development Block Grant; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is entering its twenty-fifth year as an entitlement community under the federal Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, in the past twenty-four years the Village has used its Community Development Block Grant entitlement to implement various projects to address the community development and housing needs of Iow and moderatedncome and elderly residents, to reduce and prevent the occurrence of deterioration in the Village, to increase accessibility for the handicapped, and to address other community needs in conformance with the objectives of the Community Deve!opment Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has been allocated $467,000 for fiscal year 2004 from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and expects to generate $65,000 in annual program income; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees has determined that the Consolidated Plan and the use of CDBG funds can be of benefit in providing for residents' health, safety and welfare and in meeting the community and housing needs of its citizens: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby approves the attached Consolidated Plan, which includes an allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds in the amount of $532,000. Youth Service Programs Health Care Elderly/Community Services Program Disabilities Programs Transitional Living Program and Resource Center Homeless Programs Single Family Rehabilitation Loan Program 1st Time Homebuyers Program Emergency Repair Program Neighborhood Sidewalk Ramp ADA Program Neighborhood Improvements General Administration $45,500 13,000 3,000 28,500 13,000 5,500 188,500 20,000 30,000 55,000 65,000 65.,000 FY 2004 CDBG FUNDS $532.000 Page 2/2 CDBG allocations SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby authorizes the Village Manger to prepare and forward to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development a submission of Mount Prospect's 2004 Action Plan in accordance with Federal guidelines. This Plan includes an application for FY 2004 federal Community Development Block Grant funds. SECTION THREE: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2003. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\P LANX,C DBG~2004~&ction Plan\Resolution.doc