The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7. NEW BUSINESS 4/15/03Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO FROM. DATE SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER , ~--' ~ t",~ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 11, 2003 ~ PZ-48-02 - MAP AMENDMENT, RESUBDIVISION, & DEV. CODE 1850 W. GOLF ROAD FRANK CHILELLO - APPLICANT The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve a map amendment, plat of resubdlvls~on, and Development Code Exception for the above property. The proposal is described m detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Comnnsslon heard the request at their March 27, 2003 meeting The Planning & Zoning Commission d~scussed the proposed rezomng and resubd~vlslon in detail They received comments from the neighbors regar&ng the project, and the neighbors' general consensus was that the proposed resubdlws~on was appropriate for the site. The neighbors stated that several backyards located on Kenmcott Place have flooded in the past and that they are concerned that the new subdlws~on may create additional flooding problems for the area Several neighbors addressed the P&Z to emphasize that they were concerned about the current floo&ng problems on Kenmcott Place In response to the neighbors' testimony, the P&Z suggested that the residents contact the Pubhc Works Department and work w~th the Village Engineers to ~denttfy possible solutions to the existing flooding sltuatmn There was discussion among P&Z members that the natural contours of the land may dictate that the Kennlcot Place backyards accept more water than may appear 'normal' and that the stte may have been designed in that manner 0nclud~ng drainage swales to manage storm water mn-off ). There was d~scussmn about Development Code regulations that pertmn to grade changes and how new developments cannot create add~tional mn-off for adjacent prope~es. However, the P&Z recommended that Staff identify ways in which the Kenmcot flooding could be reduced at the t~me the petitioner applies for the reqmred Building permits In addition, the P&Z recommended that as a con&taon of the project's approval a 50-foot front yard setback be established for the properties that front onto Golf Road After this d~scuss~on, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the proposed map amendment to rezone the property at 1850 W. Golf Road from RX S~ngle Family to RI Single Family with the conditions that 1) Village Eng~neenng Staff inspect the site and work with the petitioner to help improve the area's existing drainage problems, and 2) establish a 50-foot front yard setback for Lots 1 & 2 (which front onto Golf Road); 6-0 to approve an exception to the Development Code lot w~dth-depth ratio allowing the proposed lot depths as shown on the plat of resubdivlslon; and 6-0 to approve the plat of resubdlvislon to create a 3olot subdivision for the property located at 1850 W. Golf Road Staff has researched the reported flooding on Kenmcott Place since the P&Z meeting and found that the Village's records do not include flood complaints from the homeowners on Kenmcott Place However, topographmal maps show a slgmficant grade change and ~ndlcate that some of the properties on Kenmcott Place are as much as four- feet lower than the surrounding properties. The Engmeenng D~Wslon was made aware of the flooding complaints Z-48-02 / 1850 W Golf Road April 11, 2003 Page 2 and agreed to anspect the Kenmcott properties prior to revaewlng the gradang plans for the proposed three-lot subdlwsmn The results of thas anspectlon wall be incorporated anto the plan review of the proposed sate In addition, the Village Attorney smd at was mom an keeping wath the antent of the code to attach the P&Z's con&t~ons of approval to the Development Code Exception ordinance Therefore, the P&Z rmnutes reflect the actions taken at the public heanng, but the ordinances were drafted to comply with regulatmns Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their rewew and consideration at their April 15, 2003 meeting ' Staffwfll be present to answer any questions related to thas matter. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-48-02 PETITIONER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: PARCEL #: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: March 27, 2003 Frank Chilelli ~ 3 Watercrest Ct. South Barringt~n, IL~ 60010 1850 W. Golf Rd. Frank Chdelli 08-15-200-014 March 12, 2003 Rezone & Resubdivlde Property into 3 lots and Development Code Exception Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cot'ten ~ Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Michael Jacobs, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development John & Jeanett~ Blunda Adele Bryczek Frank Chilelli Anthony LoBosco Sandy Martin Carol & Michael Wilcox Ray & Camdle Swidron Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:3 ! p m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 27 meeting, seconded by Merrill Cotten The February meeting minutes were approved 6-0 At 7.33, Ms Juracek introduced Case No PZ-48-02, a request to rezone and resubthvide a property into 3 lots in addition to seeking an ?xception to a Development Code requirement She said that the request would be Village Board final ' Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, explained th'at the subject property is located on the north side of Golf Road, east of Meier Road She said that it contains a single-family residence with related improvements and is zoned RX Single Family Residence The Subject Property is bordered by the RX district to the west and R1 Single Family Residence to the east and north She noted that the Subject Property is one of the few remaining parcels on Golf Road with an RX zoning classification and that the petitioner proposes to rezone it from RX to RI. The RX district reqmres a minimum lot size of 17,500 s.f. while the R1 district requires 8,125 s.f. She said that the petitioner would like to demolish the ex~sting residence and subdivide the property to create a 3-lot subdivision. However, two of the proposed lots would exceed the depth-to-width ratio listed in the Development Code because of the manner in which the surrounding lots were developed, the subject property's large lot size, and the petitioner seeking to meet village codes regulations Ms Connolly explained that the pet!tioner co~uld have st~bdivided the subject property to create more than the proposed 3 lots and still meet minimum lot size regulations, but this would have created an irregular design of access to some of the lots and required traveling across another property.' She said that the petitioner simplified the design and created larger lots to ensure safe ingress and egress to and from the proposed lots Two of the homes would front on Golf Road and would sham a 20' wide curb-cut per Illinois Department &Transportation requirements. She noted that the Planning & Zoning Commission PZ-48-02 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 design has not been finahzed, but a 10' wide driveway on each lot would meet Village requirements. She said that the third lot would front onto and have access from Deborah Lane. Ms Connolly said the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map designates the subject property as single family residence. The petitioner's proposed Map Amendment and Resubdivision requests are in keeping with the Village's designation Other departments reviewed the case and the F~re Department noted that the proposed homes and sites would have to be constructed according to Village regulations In addit~on, the Engineering Division had no objections to the rezoning and Development Code exception They found that the plat was prepared in accordance w~th Village Codes Ms Connolly explained that in order to approve the project, the request must meet the standards for a Map Amendment listed in the Zoning Ordinance She summarized the standards and said that the proposal meets the standards for a Map Amendment because it is compatible with existing properties within the general area of the subject property The proposal is consistent w~th the general development trend and meets the Village's Comprehensive Plan requirements Although the proposed lot sizes are larger than the adjacent properties, the lot depth will provide a buffer from Golf Road, which is a highly traveled major arterial road. Ms Connolly reviewed the plat of resubdivis~on and said that the petitioner seeks to create 3 lots of record by subdividing the subject property. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with the Development Code requirements, but the petltloner is seeking relief from the Development Code regulations for the lot depth-to-width ratio The Development Code permits exceptions to Development Code regulations in cases of hardship, "caused by conditions umquely attributable to the land under consideration, would be imposed upon an applicant by compliance with these regulations and upon a finding that there are alternate feasible means of fulfilhng the purpose and spirit of the regulations to protect the pubhc health, safety and welfare..". She said that the request must meet the standards for an exception listed tn the Development Code. Ms Connolly summarized the standards and said that the subject property measures more than one acre in size and exceeds the minimum reqmrements of the RX zoning district. She said that the petitioner has designed the 3-lot subdivlsmn in a manner that exceeds the 2-1/2 to 1 depth-to-width ratio required by the Development Code because of the manner ~ln which the adjacent properties were subdiwded, in addition to the Village's policy of reqmrmg direct access onto each lot of record. She noted that the staff report has specific measurements and said that basmally Lot 1 ~is 28' too deep, Lot 2 is 50' too'deep, but Lot 3 which fronts onto Deborah Lane meets Code Ms Connolly said that the increased lot depth for the properties that front onto Golf Road is a unique circumstance generally not applicable to most properties in the Village. She smd that Golf Road is a major arterial road with a h~gh traffic volume and_that the increased lot depth will allow the petitioner to construct the proposed homes further away from the road, which will help to buffer the vehicle noise She smd that the proposed lot depths would not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety or general welfare The increased lot depth would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood, or utility provision and it would be in compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance Based on these findings, staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commissmn make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Map Amendment, Plat of Resubdivislon, and Development Code exception for the property located at 1850 W. Golf Road, Case No PZ-48-02 The Village Board's decision is final for this case Frank Chllelh, 3 Watercrest Ct, South Barnngton, was sworn ~n and testified that he was in agreement w~th the case presentation provided by Ms. Connolly He briefly described the homes he planned to construct. Ms. Juracek inquired about his construction experience. He replied that he stud~ed architecture and designed and built his home and business but this would be his first subdivision. He smd he is not a builder and that he is in the grocery business. He said he has owned the property for a year and ~s consldenng building the home on Deborah Lane for h~mself Planning & Zoning Commission PZ-48-02 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3 Ms. Juracek pointed out this was a straightforward requesi for a subdivision W~th no reqhests for variations for setbacks, etc. Ms Juracek asked if anyone in the audience had questions. Ray Swidron, 808 Kennicott, came forward and was sworn in. He stated he has lived in his home,~which abuts the northeast corner of the subject property, for five years. He said that he is concerned about water runoff He presented pictures that showed pooling in the yard and said his backyard is unusable during rainy periods. He said that he installed drain tiles for this problem, but that hasn't resblved the issue. He said that another 50% of housing added to the area would exacerbate the problem. Ms. Juracek asked Mr. Chilelll if the subject property whs on septtc and whether he planned to connect the new houses to the sewer system He confirmed that the property is currently on a septic system and said the new homes would be connected to the sewer system. Ms. Juracek asked if that would lessen the water drainage problem. Ms C6nnolly clarified that the Development Code does not allow new developments to create additional run-off or flooding issues for adjacent properties. She noted that the adjacent properties would not receive additional water as a result of the new development Ms Connolly said she had referred Mr. Swidron to the project engineer before the start of the meeting and encouraged h~m to contact him about the matter. Mr. Cotten satd the driveways and roofs would accelerate the water runoff. Mr. Cotten suggested imposing a condition to improve the runoff situation Jeanette Blunda, 804 S. Kennicott, was sworn in and said that she and her husband were original owners on Kennicott and can attest to the water problem She smd that th6y were told originally that a swale would be installed on her property, but that was never done. All the neighbors attempted to alleviate the situation by installing dram tiles. She said that she was concemed that the experienced builder who constructed their homes was unable to deal with the water problem and that the proposed construction would be done by an ~nexperienced builder. Sandy Martin, 811 S. Deborah Lane, was swom ~n. She wanted an explanation of the proposed access to the Deborah' Lane home. Mr. Chilelh illustrated the location of the proposed driveway to the s~de-loading garage using the shde of the site. ~ · Ms Blunda reiterated her concern that a well-quahfied builder be contracted for this project. Ms. Juracek informed neighbors that thts hearing was for the rezoning and resubdtviding of the property and actual construc~tion would need to be permitted, inspected, and meet the Vdlage Codes i Carol Wilcox, 808 Deborah, was sworn in and said they were never given a plan to see what would be built. She asked when they would..see plans Ms. Connolly explained that several of the neighbors did come to the Planmng office~ ' before the P&Z meeting and reviewed the file Staff provided these neighbors with multiple copies of the apphcatmn and plans Ms Connolly provided Ms. Wilcox with a copy of the staff memo and plans Ms Juracek closed the pubhc hearing at 8'12 Memll Cotten asked Ms Connolly when the original subdivision had been built Ms Connolly said it had been subdlwded and bmlt in two phases, beginning m the 1960s through the 1980s Matt Sledz noted that several vahd concerns had been ;rased and said conditions should be imposed to ensure that the drmnage problems be addressed. He also sand setbacks should be included in the vote to ensure the houses are set far from Golf Road. lanning & Zoning Commission PZ-48-02 ~ Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 4 Matt Sledz moved to amend the Map Amendment approval to include the conditions that 1) Village Engineering Staff inspect the site and work with the petitioner to help improve the area's existing drainage problems, and 2) establish a setback of at least 50' for the two proposed lots that front onto Golf Road for the property at 1850 W. Golf Road, Case No. PZ-48-02. Rmhard Rogers seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL.' AYES: Cotten, Donnelly, Floros, Rogers, Sledz and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 6-0 ~ Richard Rogers moved to approve the Map Amendment approval as amended Merrill Cotten seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES Cot'ten, Donnelly, Floros, Rogers, Sledz and Juracek NAYS' None Motion was approved 6-0 R~chard Rogers moved to recommend that the Village Board approve the request for a Development Code exception for the property at 1850 W. Golf Road, Case No PZ-48-02. Matt Sledz seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES. Cotten, Donnelly, Floros, Rogers, Sledz and Juracek NAYS None Motion was approved 6-0. Richard Rogers moved to recommend that the V~'llage Board approve the Plat of Resubd~vlsion to create 3-lots of record, for the property at 1850 W. Central Road, Case No. PZ-48-02. Matt Sledz seconded the motion UPON ROLL CALL. ,, AYES: Cotten, Donnelly, Floros, Rogers, Sledz, and Juracek NAYS None Motion was approved 6-0. Ms. Juracek confirmed that this case would go before the V~llage Board on Wednesday, April 15. At 9 12 p m, Leo FIoros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Joe Donnelly. The motion was approved by a votce vote and the meeting was adjourned Barbara Swlatek, Planning Secretary ' /6ay ?2bhn411 , Senior Planner ?/ Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 48 -02 L6CATION: PETITIONER: PROPERTY OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 1850 W. Gol£Road Frank Ch~lelh Frank Ch~lelll 08-15-200-014-0000 I 1 acres RX S~ngle Famdy One Single Family Residence Rezone to R1 S~ngle Family and subdivide the lot to create three lots of record (requires Map Amendment, Plat of Resubd~ws~on, and an exception to the Development Code for the lot depth ratio) LOCATION MAP 801 ~ 800 80] 80Z 805 804 807 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: DATE: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER MARCH 20, 2003 HEARING DATE: MARCH 27, 2003 SUBJECT: PZ-48-02 - MAP AMENDMENT, RESUBDIVISION, AND DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION - 1850 W. GOLF ROAD BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the March 27, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Frank Chilelh (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 1850 W. Golf Road (the "Subject Property") The Petitioner has requested a Map Amendment, Resubdlvislon, and Deve!opment Code exception for the subject property The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the March 12, 2003 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addltmu, Staffhas completed the required written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted a Public Hearm~ sign on the Subject Property PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The SubJect Property is located on the north side of Golf Road, east of Meier Road, and contains a sihgle-family residence with related improvements The Subject Property is zoned RX Single Family Residence and is bordered by the RX district to the west ahd R1 Single Family,Residence to the east and north. The Subject Property is one of the few remaining parcels on Golf Road with an RX zoning classification SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner proposes to rezone the Subject Property from RX to RI. Tile RX district requires a minimum lot size of 17,500 square feet while the RI district requires 8,125 square feet The Petitioner would like to demolish the existing residence and resubdlvide the Subject Property into a three-lot subdivision The proposed lots would exceed the RI minimum lot size requirements, and the homes would meet the applicable zoning regulations However, due to the manner m which the surrounding lots were developed, the large lot size, and the Petitioner seeking to meet Village Codes regulations, the proposed lots would exceed the depth-tp-wldth ratio hsted in the Development Code (Sec. 16 403 C 2 f) GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE ~ As previously noted, tile proposed lots would exceed the minimum RI lot size requirement and the houses would comply with the R1 Bulk Regulations. The table on the next page compares the RX district to the R1 district According to code regulations the Petitioner could have subdivided the SubJect Property to create more than the proposed three lots and still met minimum lot size regulations, 'however, this would have created an irregular design of access to some of the lots (i e. traveling across another property) Therefore, the Petitioner simplified the design and created larger lots to ensure safe ingres~ and egress to/from the proposed lots Two of the homes would front on to Golf Road, and per Illinois Departm6nt of Transportation (IDOT) requirements, share a 20-foot wide curb-cut The design has not been finalized, but a 10-foot wide driveway on each lot would meet Village requirements The third lot would front on to and have access from Deborah Lane (an existing cul-de-sac located d~rectly north of the SubJect Property) ~ PZ-48-02 Planmng & Zoning Commission meeting March 27, 2003 Page 3 RX District RI Petitioner's District Proposal Lot 1 14,346 sq ft Minimum 17,500 sq ft 8,125 sq ft Lot 2 15,825 sq ft Lot Size Lot 3' 19,286 sq ft~ Lot 1: 72-feet Minimum 85-feet 65-feet Lot 2: 72-feet Lot Width Lot 3: 137.76-feet Lot 1: 196 82-feet Minimum 120-feet 120-feet Lot 2: 219.42-feet Lot Depth Lot 3. 137 76-feet Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning The Village's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map designate the Subject Property as Single Family Residence The Pehtmner's proposed Map Amendment and Resubdlvlsion are in keeping with the Village's designation. Other Department Comments The F~re Department noted that the proposed hmh~s and site would have to ge constructed according to Village regulations The Engineering D~vis~on had no objections to th6 rezonmg and Development Code exception They found that tile plat was prepared m accordance with Village Codes. ~ ' MAP AMENDMENT STANDARDS Tile standards for Map Amendments are listed in Section 14 203.D 8.a of the Village Zoning Ordinance When a Map Amendment is proposed, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in each specific case with respect to, but not hmlted to, the following matters' compatibility with ex~stmg uses and zoning classifications of property w~th~n the general area of the property ,n question, the compatibility of the sffrrounding'property with the permitted uses hsted in the proposed zoning classification; the suitability &the property m question to the uses permmed under the existing and proposed zoning classifications; consistency w,th the trend of development in the g~neral area of the property in question, and the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village. The SubJect Property is adjacent to existing single family residences and the proposed rezoning will be in keeping with the surrounding area Although the proposed lot sizes are larger than the adjacent properties (subdivided ,n the late 1960s and 1980s), the lots will provide a buffer from the adjacent homes and Golf Road, which is a highly traveled major arterial road The proposal meets the standards for a Map Amendment because it is compatible w,th ex~stmg properhes w~th~n the general area of the Subject Property. The proposal is consistent w~th the general development trend and !neets the Village's Comprehensive Plan reqmrements PLAT OF RESU~BDIVISION ~ ~ The petitioner seeks to create three lots &record by subd~wdmg the' Subjec't P~'operty The proposed plat is part of PZ-48-02, a Map Amendment request and Development Code Exception request The plat was prepared in Z-48-02 ~, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting March 27, 2003 Page 4 accordance with the Development Code requirements, but the Petitioner is seeking relief from the Development Code regulations for the lot depth-to-w,dth ratio. DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION STANDARDS Sec. 15.109 permits the Planning & Zoning Commiss,on to recommend approval of exceptions to Development Code regulations in cases of hardship, "caused by conditions uniquely attributable to the land under considerat,on, would be imposed upon an appl,cant by compliance with these regulations and upon a finding that there are alternate feasible means of fulfilhng the purpose and spirit of the regulations to protect the public health, safety and welfare...". The request must meet the standards for an exception, which are listed in Sec 15.109 and are summarized as follows · A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally apphcable to other properties m the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property, · Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and · Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Subject Property measures more than one-acre in size and exceeds the minimum requirements of the RX zoning district Due to the manner in which the adjacent properties were subdivided, as well as the Village's policy of requiring direct access onto each lot of reco~rd, the Petitioner has designed the three-lot subdivision in a manner that exceeds the 2 1/2:1 depth-to-width ratio required by the Development Code. The following table summarizes the Village's requirements and the Petitioner's proposed lot depths. Code Requirement Proposed 120' minimum Ranging from 196 84 to 219 42' Lot 1 180' maximum (Average depth 208') 120' minimum Ranging from 219.42 to 239.7' Lot 2 180' maximum (Average depth 230') 120' minimum 140.01-feet Lot 3 344' maximum (Meets code requirements) The increased lot depth for the properties that front on to Golf Road is a unique circumstance generally not applicable to most properties m the Vdlage Also, Golf Road is a major arterial road with a high traffic volume. The increased lot depth will allow the Petitioner to construct the proposed homes further away from the road, which will help to buffer the veh,cle noise The proposed lot depths would not have a detrimental impact on the public heaith, safety or general welfare The increased lot depth would not adversely affect the cha~'acter of the surrounding neighborhood, or utility provision and it would be in compliance with the~ Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Map Amendment, Plat of Resubdlvision, and Development Code exception meet the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance and the D~velopment Code. Based on these findings, Staff recomroends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Map Amendment, Plat of Resubdivislon, and Development Code exception for the property located at 1850 W. Golf Road, Case No PZ-48-02 The Village Board's decision Is final for this case. I concur. William J. Cooney, AICP, IDlrector of Community De elopment VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, lllmms 60056 Pnune 847-818-5328 FAX 847-818-5328 Map Amendment Request, Case Number Paz "Development Name/Address Date of Submission Hearing Date Common Address(cs) (Street Number, Street) I~'~0 t.4,,'. God./: ,'~ ,.%7-: /J.,e~,,'~ff'¢cT'- /Z. Site Area (Ac.) Current Zoning Proposed Zon,ng Total Bufl&ng Sq Ft (Proposed) Proposed Development and Land Use B r/o,'f~.x' o 4/ _~ Setbacks (Prop) Front 4.0 Building Hetght Rear '30 Fr' Lot Coverage (%) S~de # of Parkmg Spaces Tax I D Number or County Assigned Pm Number(s) o~ -~/F- -20-o - ol q - Legal Description (attach addmonal sheets if necessary) S~de /0 i/2 OF THAT PART OF LOT 4 LYIZIG WEST OF A LIIYE THAT IS 275.50 FEET FAST OF AND pAR2tI.I.I~.T. TO TIKE WEST LINE OF LOT 4, AS MI~-~SURED ON THE NORTH LINE T~..REOF {'EXCEPTING FROM SAm PART OF LOT 4, THE NORTH 475 FEET THEREOF), IN DMSION OF TIEE LOUIS F. BUSSE FARMS, BEING THE NORTB'~.&ST 1/4 (EXCEPT THE wJsST 686.40 F~:ET OF TI4E. NORTHw,~ST 1/4 OF SAID NORTIEEAST 1/4) OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL Rm-RIDIAN, AND EXCEPT ROADS IN COOK COUN'zY, II-T-I~t0IS. Corporatxon Telephone (evemng) Street Ad&ess Fax C~ty Z~p Code Pager Interest m Property qame Telephone (day) Corporation , Telephone (evening) Street Ad&ess , Fax: C~ty State Z~p Code: Pager Developer ' ~ Name~ Telephone (day) Ad&ess Fax Attorney Name Telephone (day) Ad&ess Fax 'Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Ar~hlteet Name Telephone (day). Ad&ess Fax Landscape,Architect Name " Telephone (day): Address Fax Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847/392-6064 Mount Prospect Depm'l~.ent of Community Development 1 O0 South Emerson Stxeet, Mount Prospect Illino~s 2 roposed Zomng Change Describe the Justification for the Proposed Map Amendment D~scnb~ m D~fl ~ Bufl~ and Acuwu~s Propns~d (a~ach addmonal Please note that the applicauon wall not be reviewed untal this pentaon has been fully completed and all reqmred plans and other matenals have been sansfactonly subrmtted to the Plarmmg D~wsmn. Incomplete submittals ,,vall not be accepted It is strongly suggested that the petmoner schedule an appointment wath the appropriate Village staffso that materials canbe revaewed for accuracy and completeness at the tune of subrmttal. In cons~deratzon of the mformanon contained in flus petmon as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to flus request The apphcant is the owner or authorized representatwe of the owner of the property. The pennoncr and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents perrmssmn to enter on the property dunng reasonable hours for v~sual mspecuon of the subject property. '~ I hereby alTu-m that all informataon provided herein and in all materials submitted in assoclataon w~th flus apphcation are true and accurate to the be~2dy knowledge. __ Apphcant ,, n~~-~- ~"/~ Date If apphcant Is not property owner. hereby designate the apphcant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Vanation(s) described m flus apphcauon and the assocmted supporting material Property Owner Date Mount Prospect Department of Commumty Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect lllmois Phone 847.818 5328 Fax 847 818 5329 TDD 847~392-6064 · VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illmms 60056 Phone 84%818-5328 FAX 847-818-5329 Plat of Resubdivision Application Case Number PZ Subdtvmon Name/Ad&ess Date of Submmmon Hearing Date Petmoner- Name?./~ ~ff]d/t~K¥c 0 ~/-//LffLL! Telephone (day) Co~oratmn , ~ Telephone (eyeing) S~eet Ad&ess Fax ~ B~P/~* st~t~ Z~pCode~ Pager IL ~ o o40 Interest m Prope~' c~cle one ~ Buyer Property Owner - Name ff~~60 (/7/~Z& Telephone(day) Co~oranon ~ Telephone (evemng) S~eet Ad&ess Fax C~W State Z~p Code Pager~obfle Surveyor~ngineer t Name , Z~ 5~g~ ~ 4~ Telephone(day) Ad&ess I ~ ] ~, ~f~/~ ~tT~ ~ Fax c~fo~Go lA. 60(02 UBDIVISION NAME REAL ESTATE INDEX NO.: o .4' --)' o O 0 / ,,4z- o oo REAL ESTATE INDEX NO.:, .. -- LOCATION OR ADDRESS: LAND USE: EXISTING ZONING: EXISTING ~ PROPOSED: PROPOSED: TOTAL ACREAGE: TOTAL # OF LOTS: Number of d~velling units: GROSS Single Family: ~ Multifamily TWNHS If requefiting an exception to Development Code requirements, list request and explain why it is necessary: Please note that the apphcatmn wdl not be rewewed until t~s petmon has been ~lly complete~ ahd all requked plans and other materials have been sahshclonly subm~ed to the Pla~]ng Dw~s~on Incomplete subm~ls wall not be accepted It ~s s~ongly suggested ~at the petmoner schedule an appointment w~ the appropriate Village staff to review the process and so ~at ~tenals can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the hme ofaub~al In cons;derat:on of the mformatton contmned in tkis petmon as well as all supportmg documentahon, It IS requested that approval be gwen to thts request The apphcant ts the owner or authorhzed representatwe of the owner of the property. The petmoner and the owner of the property grant employees of the %llage of Mount Prospect and their agents penmsston to enter on the property dunng reasonable hours for vtsual inspect:on of the subject property I hereby affu'm that all xnforrnat:on provtded herem and~n al~l mater~ s~bmined ~n assoctanon w~th tius apphcation are true and accurate t° the best~-~~y~kn°wledge ~// //"// If apphcant ts not property owner. I hereby designate the apphcant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Vanahon(s) described m th~s apphcatmn and the - assomated supporting rnaterml Property Owner Date Mount Prospect Department of Commumty Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Ilhnms Phone 847 818.5328 Fax 847 818 5329 TDD 847/392-6064 275 5 FFL~ ,/~ - ~ R04D Z 7 ~oo o~ PROPERTY DF-SCRIPTION THE EAST 1/2 OF THAT PA, PT OF LOT 4 (LYING W l$ 275 $0 FEET F..A~T OFAND PARALLEL TO THE W AS MEASL/KED ON THE NORTH UN£ THEREOF (E SAID PART OF LOT4, THE NORTH 475 FEETTHEF..[ LOt..'l$ F BUSSEFAP,.MS, BEING THE NORTHEAST1~ WEST 6~ 40 FEETOF THE NOP. THWEST 1/4- OF SA OF SECTION 15. TOWNSHIP 4~ NOETH, Iba, NGE 11 PKINCIPAL MEP. IDI~N AND EXCEPT ROAP$ IN CC TO CHICAGO I'~TLE COMPANY Proposed 3-Lot Subdivision N89°46'33'E 137 76' LOT 3 19,286 SQ. FT. N89'46'33"E 68 87' I 137.76' · ~ 88' I ,o LOT 2 15,825 SO, FT. 1 dan Kn~pple 121 S ElmhurstAve Mt Prospect, IL 60056t Apnl 5, 2003 W~lham J. Cooney, AiCP D~rector of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 100 S Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Mr. Cooney, The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of my front porch by a 6-0 vote Our case is scheduled to go before Village Board for the ord,nance's first reading on April 15th, I am requesbng that the V~llage Board waive the second reading, tentatively scheduled for the second V~llage Board meeting, and take hnal action at the Apnl 15th meebng I am currently wa~t~ng for permit approval and would hke to start my addition as soon as possible I appreciate your assmtance in facilitating th~s request. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at 847-259-9795 o.5 Respectfully, Bnan Knipple vwl 10/11/02 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 121 S ELMHURST AVENUE WHEREAS, Bnan Knipple (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit, w~th respect to,property located at 121 S. Elmhurst Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property), and legally described as follows Property Index Number. 08-12-112-021-000 LOT 108 IN H. ROY BERRY Co.'S COLONIAL MANOR, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THRID PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN COOK COUNTY, IL and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to construct an unenclosed porch encroaching five feet (5') into the required front yard setback, and WHEREAS, a Pubhc Heanng was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit being the subject of PZ-05-03 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of March, 2003, pursuant to proper legal not~ce hawng been pubhshed in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 12th day of March, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Planmng and Zoning ,Commission has submitted ~ts findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-05-03; and WHEREAS, tl~e President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect have g~ven consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Vdlage and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best ~nterest of the Vdlage NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. SECTION ONE' The recitals set forth here~nabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount Prospect. Page 2/2 121 S EImhurstAve SECTION TWO The President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Cond~bonal Use permit, as prowded for in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Vdlage Code, to allow the construction of an unenclosed porch encroaching five feet (5') into the required front yard setback, as shown on the S~te Plan, a copy of which ~s attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE. That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and d~rected to record a certified copy of th~s Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication ~n pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES' NAYS: ABSENT. PASSED and APPROVEDthis day of ,2003. ATTEST. Gerald L. Farley Vdlage President Velma W Lowe Vdlage Clerk H \GEN\file$\WIN\ORDINANC\C USE, 121 S Elmhursl ave porch & encroachment.dQc illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO FROM DATE' SUBJECT. MICHAEL E JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 11, 2003 PZ-05-03 - CONDITIONA~ USE (PORCH) 121 S ELMHURSTAVENUE BRIAN KNIPPLE - APPLICANT ran The Planmng & Zoning Commission transmits then: recommendation to approve Case PZ-05-03, unenclosed covered porch, as described in detail m the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their March 27, 2003 meeting The subject property is located in a slngle-famaly residential neighborhood The proposed porch would encroach 5-feet into the front yard The porch would be constructed from wood and have an overhang, railings, and columns. The proposed porch requires Conditional Use approval because it encroaches into the 30-foot front setback The Planmng & Zoning Commission briefly discussed the petlUoner's plans for a second story addition, the porch materials, and noted that the porch and addition complied with zoning regulations The Planning & Zoning Commission members voted 6-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve a request for a Conditional Use permit for the construction of an unenclosed cover~ed porch 25-feet feet from the front property hne at 121 S Elmhurst Avenue, Case No PZ-05-03. Please forward this memorandum and attachments t~ the Village Board for their review and consideration at their April 15, 2003 meeting. Staffwfll be present to answer any questions related to this matter. CASE NO. PZ-05-03 MINUTES OF TIlE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Heanng Date: March 27, 2003 PETITIONER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: Brian Knipple ' 121 S. Elmhur~t Avenue PROPERTY OWNER: PARCEL #: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: Brian Knlpple ~ March 12, 2003 Conditional Use approval to construct a porch m the front yard setback MEMBERS PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Memll Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz MEMBERS ABSENT: KeIth Youngquist STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly} AICP, Senior Planner Michael Jacobs, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Brian and Ann Knlpple Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7.31 p m Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 27 meeting, seconded by Merrill Cotten. The February meeting rmnutes were approved 6-0 At 8.17, Ms Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-05-03, a request for Conditional Use approval to construct a porch that would encroach on the front yard setback. She said that the request would be Village Board final Judy Connolly, Semor Planner presented the case She described the subject property as being located on the east sade of Elmhurst Avenue, between Evergreen and Prospect Avenues, and said that at contmns a single-family residence with related improvements. The subject property as zoned RA Single Family Residence and as bordered on all sides by the .RA district She said that the existing home on the subject property as currently set back approximately 30-feet from the front lot line, 5-feet from the south lot hne and 9.5-feet from the north lot line The petitioner plans to add on to the existing house and include an unenclosed front porch She said that the proposed porch would encroach 5' into the required front yard, which requires Conditional Use approval. The existing home and addition comply with zoning regulations and are summarized in the staff report Ms Connolly said the standards for Conditional Uses are listed an the Zoning Ordinance She summarized the standards and said that locating an unenclosed porch 5-feet in the front yard would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood, utility provision or public streets and the proposed Conditmnal Use wall be In eomphance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zomng Ordinance She said that based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Condmonal Use for an unenclosed porch to encroach 5-feet into the reqmred front yard for the residence at 121 S. Elmhurst Avenue, Case No PZ-05-03. She noted that the Village Board's demsion is final for ttus case lanning & Zoning Commission PZ-05-03 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson , . Page 2 Mr. & Mrs. Brian Kmpple, 121 S Elmhurst Ave., were swom an and testified that they want to put an addition on thetr home and would lake to add a front porch that would encroach mto the required setback Mr. Rogers asked the petitioners ff they understood that the porch could never be enclosed The pet~ttoners smd they understood th~s cond~tmn of approval. Ms Juracek asked afanyone m the audience had questions. There being none, she closed the pubhc heanng at 8 19. Rmhard Rogers moved to recommend that the Village Board approve the request for a Cond~ttonal Use to construct an unenclosed porch that would encroach 5-feet ~n the front yard setback at 121 S. Elmhurst Avenue, Case No PZ-05-03 Matt Sledz seconded the motion UPON ROLL CALL: AYES Cotten, Donnelly, Floros, Rogers, Sledz and Juracek NAYS. None Motion was approved 6-0. Village Board's demston will be final At 9.12 p m, Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Joe Donnelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meettng was adjourned. Barbara Sw~atek, Planning Secretary H ~GEI~PLANNING~Planmng & Zomn8 COM3&P&Z 2003~Vhnute~\PZ-0~-0t 121 S £1mhmt Av~u, do¢ Village. of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 05-03 LOCATION: PETITIONER: OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 121 S Elmhurst Avenue Brian Kmpple Brian Knlpple 08-12-112-021-000 0 18 acres (7,637.5 square feet) RA S~ngle Family Residence Stngle Family Residential Conditional Use - Porch in front yard I0~ 108 ils ]14 12~ 122 203 202 205 204 :tO'/ 206 209 208 211 210 213 212 215 214 217 216 21~ 218 221 220 223 222 LOCATION MAP 2o0 205 207 206 2O9 208 213 219 215 2~3 2~$ [ 2OO 212 2Il 216 2JJ 218 lis 220 Village of Mount prosPect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOLrNT PRosPECT PLAN~ING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: MARCH 20, 2003 HEARING DATE: MARCH 27, 2003 SUBJECT: PZ-05-03 - CONDITIONAL USE (PORCH) 121 S. ELMHURST AVENUE (KN~PPLE RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND A pubhc hearing has' been scheduled for the March 2), 2003 Planmng & Zoning Commtssion meeting to rev:ew the apphcation by Brian Kmpple (the "Pet~tmner") regarding the property located at 121 S. Elmhurst Avenue (the "SubJect Property"). The Petmoner has re~luested Conditional Use approval to allow the construcuon of a new porch tn the front yard The P&Z hearing was prol~erly notmed m the March 12, 2003 edmon of the Journal Top:cs Newspaper In addmon, Staff has completed.the reqmred written notice to property owners wtthin 250- feet and posted a Pubhc Heanng s:gn on the SubJect Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The SubJect Property is located on the east side of Elmhurst Avenue, between Evergreen and Prospect Avenues, and contains a s:ngle-famfly residence w~th related ~mprovements. ' The Subject Property is zoned RA S~ngle Family Restdence and :s bordered on all sides by the Pg. Dtstnct. The existing home on the SubJect Property is currently set back approx:mately 30-feet from the front lot hne (30 6') and 5-feet from the south side lot hne and 9 5-feet from the north side lot hne. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL ' The anached exhibits outhne the Petmoner's plans for the proposed addmon and unenclosed front porch. The proposed ~mprovements include extending the house to the east (rear), a second story addmon, and mstalhng a porch w~th a concrete base The proposed porch wo~ld encroach 5' ~nto the required front yard, thus requmng Condmonal Use approval. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE As prewously noted, the ex~st~ng home and addition c. omply w:th zomng regulations The table on the following page compares the Pet:ttoner's proposal to the RA S~ngle Family Residence dtstnct's bulk reqmrements Z-05-03 Planning & Zoning Commtssxon meeting March 27, 2003 Page 3 RA Single Family District ~xisting Proposed Minimum Requirements SETBACKS: Front 30' 30 5' 25 00' Interior 5' 9.6' north & no change 5' south no change Rear 25' 37' no change LOT COVERAGE 50% Maximum 42% 44% CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Condmonal Uses are hsted m Section 14.203 F.8 of the Village Zomng Ordinance and tnclude seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Condtttonal Use. The following hst m a summary of these findings: · The Condmonal Use will not have a detrimental tmpact on the pubhe health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare, ~ , · The Condmonal Use 'wtll not be injurious to thi~ use, enjoyment~ or value of other propemes tn the wctmty or ~mpede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate prowsion of utfixttes, drmnage, and destgn, of access and egress to mtmm~ze congestmn on Village streets, and · ~Comphance of the Condmonal Use wtth the provtstons of the Comprehenswe Plan, Zomng Code, 'and other Village Ordinances ,, The proposal would not adversely affect the character of the surroun&ng neighborhood, utthty provtston or pubhc streets and' the proposed Condtttonal Use wtll be in comphance wtth the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zomng Ordtnance. RECOMMENDATION The proposed unenclosed porch meets the Cond~ttonal Use standards contmned in Sectton 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Plannmg & Zonmg Comrmss~on make a . recommendation-to the Village Board to approve a Condmonal Use for an unenclosed porch to encroach 5-feet tnto the reqmred front yard for the residence at 121 S. Elmhurst Avenue, Case No PZ-05-03. The Village Board's decxston ts final for tNs case I concur: William J Cooney, AICP, Director of Commumty Development VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUmTY DEVELO?ME~r DE?AXTMENT -, tdiarmlng Division 100 S Emerson Street Mount Prospect. Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818 5328 FAX 847.818 5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval Case Number P&Z Development Name/Address Date of Submission Hearing Date Address(es) (Street Number. Street) Site Area (Acres) - Property Zoning , Total Building Sq F1 (Site) O,t'f? /rr~tc/ K~, z.~cc ..~,~ /.l ,, ~ l ~ ~ ~ Setbacks- Front~ Rear Stde Stde Building Height Coverage (%)/_ ~ ~, Paring Spaces Lot Number of Adjacent Land Uses No~h Sou~ East West Tax I D Nmber or Co~W Asst~ed Pm Number(s) Legal DescnpUon (aRach addiuonal shec~ ffnecessa~) ~0 ~ IO~ ~ ~. ~0~ ~ fR¢~ ~0, Name Telephone (day) Corporation Telephone (evening) S~eet Ad,ess Fax C~ State Z~p Code Pager Interest m Prope~ Name Co~oration Telephone (evemng) S~eet Address Fax: C~W S~te Z~p Code Pager Name Telephone (day) Ad.ess Fax Attorney Name Telephone (~y) Address Fax Surveyor Name . Telephone (day) Engineer Ad.ess Fax Architect ~ Name )~,r~ '" r ~--"'~ Landscape Architect Name ; Telephone (day) Address Fax Mount Prospect Depa~unent of Commumty Development 1 O0 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Ilhnots ~ ' www mountprospect org Phone 847.818 5328 Fax 847 818 5329 TDD 847.392 6064 roposed Conditional Use (as listed m the zoning district) Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets it' necessary) Hours of Operation Address(es) (Street Number, Street) Total Budding Sq Ft (Site) Sq Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Setbacks Front ,, Rear r.. ! Braiding Height Lot Coverage (%) Nu.mber of Parking Spaces Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been sansfactonly subrmtted to the Planning Division. Incomplete subrmttals will not be accepted It is strongly suggested that the peuuoner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of subrmttal. In consideration office mfurmatlon contained m Ibis petition as ~ell as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to.this request The apphcant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents perrmsslon to enter on the properly during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby atTtrm that~ll~mforma~v~ded berem and accurate to the/~my ~kno~. j Applicant ~ ~'""'-'~'7/'--z-~'~e"~[ m in all materials submitted in association wxth flus application are tree and If apphcant is not propen'y owner. Date I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting ma~ Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www mountprospect org Phone 847.818 5328 Fax8478185329 TDD 847.392 6064 __o__~n_olly_, Judy Page I of 1 From: TRTOMEG@aol corn Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9 02 PM . To: jconnoll@mountprospectorg ~ ~ ~ Subject: PZ-05-03 A FRONT PORCHmmqmm Wonderfull Front Porches make for better neighbors wa~ted to put in a front porch rather than new front steps, with appropriate permits shape, I'm all for it Tom McGovern 200 S Pine I wish we would have Our steps were in bad 3/20/2003 athleen N. Jensen 118 South Pine Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 March 17, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission 100 S. Emerson Street Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 RE: Case No. PZ-05-03 ~ 121 South Elmhurst Ave. We are in receipt of the Notice of Hearing before the Mt. Prospect Planning & Zoning Commission regarding the above referenced case number. We are unable to submit oral comments at the meeting scheduled for March 27, 2003 but respectfully submit these written comments. My family and I live behind Mr. and Mrs. Knipple. It is our opinion that the Knipple's addition and front yard porch will enhance the overall neighborhood. Furthermore, the porch that they are contemplating constructing will promote ."neighborliness" and will enhance the friendliness we all feel toward each other. We recommend that the Village Board approve this petition for a Conditional Use to construct a porch in the front yard setback, and other relief from the Zoning Ordinance as may be required for this'project. If you would like to discuss this with me at a later date, or if you have any ,. question regarding my comments, please do not hesitate to call me at home, 8-4 7-39~-1686. : Respectfully, Kalhleen ~. Jonah Kad 4/2/03 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1850 WEST GOLF ROAD WHEREAS, Frank Chdelh (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner), has filed an apphcat~on to rezone certain property generally located at 1850 West Golf Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject, Property) and legally described as follows. PROPERTY INDEX NUMBER. 08-15-200-014-0000 THE EAST 1/2 OF THAT PART OF LOT 4 LYING WEST OF A LINE THAT IS 275 5- FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT4, AS MEASURED ON THE NORTH LINE THEREOF (EXCEPTING FROM SAID PART OF LOT4, THE NORTH 475 FEET MEASURED THEREOF), IN DIVISION OF THE LOUIS F. BUSSE FARMS, BEING THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (EXCEPT THE WEST 686.4 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4) OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND EXCEPT ROADS IN COOK COUNTY, IL WHEREAS, Pet~boner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned from R-X (S~ngle Family Residence) D~str~ct to R-1 (S~ngle Family) D~stnct, and WHEREAS, a Public Heanng was held on the request for rezon~ng being the subject of PZ 48-02, before the Planmng and Zomng Commission of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of March, 2003, pursuant to due and proper not~ce thereof hawng been pubhshed ~n the Mount Prospect Journal and Top~cs on the 12th dayof March, 2003, and WHEREAS, the Pianmng and Zomng Commission has submitted its findings and recommendation to approve the request, to the President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of PZ 48-02 and have determined that the best interests of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect would be served by granting sa~d request NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS' SECTION ONE' The recitals set forth hereinabove are ~ncorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect SECTION TWO The Official Zoning Map of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect, IIhno~s, as amended, is hereby further amended by reclassifying the property being the subject of th~s Ordinance from R-X to R-1 (Single Famdy) DIstrict Page 2/2 1850 W. Golf Road SECTION THREE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication ~n pamphlet form ~n the manner pro,~ded by law AYES NAYS ABSENT. PASSED andAPPROVEDth~s dayof ,2003 ATTEST Gerald L Farley Village President Velma W Lowe Village Clerk H ~GEN\flIes~,WIN\CRDINANCtREZONE 1850 W goff Road Apr 2003 doc Kad 4/2/03 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1850 WEST GOLF ROAD WHEREAS, the Pebtioner, Frank Chdelht, has requested approval of a Final Plat of Resubd~vision for the purpose of creating three lots of record WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning C0mm~ssion has recommended approval of the resubd~vis~on NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE' That the resubd~vision of 1850 West Golf Road lot of record to create three lots of record ~s hereby granted, and the Final Plat of Subdivision attached to th~s Resolubon as Exhibit "A", is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording Such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolubon SECTION TWO That the Vdlage Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of th~s Resolution w~th the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION THREE' This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval ~n the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS. ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVEDth~s day of ,2003. ATTEST. Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma W. Lowe Vdlage Clerk H \GEN\files\WIN\RES\Plat of Resubd~v,1850 w golf road aprd 2003 doc Proposed 3-Lot Subdivision .. N89°46'33'E 137.76' . '~ ......................... ~ ...... ~ , , Ngf'a6'33"E 137 76' ~: 68 87' 68 88' ~... , L01 1 LOT 14,346 S0, FT,~15,825 SO, FI, ,__ :.~ ,~ ~ - ~" Kad 4/2/03 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION FROM CHAPTER 15 (SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT AND SITE IMPROVEMENT) FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1850 WEST GOLF ROAD WHEREAS, Frank Chdell~ (hereinafter referred to as P~tlt~oner) is the owner of the property generally located at 1850 West Golf Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) and legally described as follows' PROPERTY INDEX NUMBER: 08-i5-200-014-0000 THE EAST 1/2 OF THAT PART O~ LOT 4 LYING WEST OF A LINE THAT IS 275 5-FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 4, AS MEASURED ON THE NORTH LINE THEREOF (EXCEPTING FROM SAID PART OF LOT 4, THE NORTH 475 FEET MEASURED THEREOF), IN DIVISION OF THE LOUIS F. BUSSE FARMS, BEING THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (EXCEPT THE WEST 686 4 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4) OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND EXCEPT ROADS IN COOK COUNTY, IL; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting the following exceptions from Section 15 305.B 6 of Chapter 15 (Subd~ws~on Development,and S~te Improvement) of the V~llage Code of Mount Prospect' To allow a minimum lot depth of ranging from 196 84 feet to 219.42 feet (average depth 208 feet) for Lot 1 rather than the required 120 feet to180 feet To allow a minimum lot depth of ranging from 219.42 feet to 239.7 (average depth 230 feet) feet for Lot 2 rather than the required 120 feet to 1 80 feet, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect did consider the request for an exception from Section 15 305.B 6 of Chapter 15 (Subd~ws~on Development and S~te Improvement) for the Subject Property at their regular meeting on March 27, 2003, sa~d request being the subject of PZ 48-02 and recommended to the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage to grant the exception from Chapter 15 as requested, and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded their recommendation being the subject of PZ 48-02 to the President and Board of Trustees of the Vdlage of Mount Prospect Page 2 of 2 PZ 48-02 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS SECTION ONE. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect SECTION TWO That the President and Board of Trustees of the V~llage of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property an exception from Secbon 15 305 B 6 of Chapter 15 (Subdivision Development and Site Improvement) of the Wllage Code of Mount Prospect to increase the lot depths, as shown on the S~te Plan, a copy' of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit A. Subject to the following conditions 1 That Lots 1 and 2 shall maintain a 50-foot front setback from the south property hne (Golf Road), 2 The Petitioner will review Village Staff's recommendabons to reduce the flooding on Kennicott Place, and cooperate w~t,h Village Staff in attempting to reduce flooding, as part of permit review. ; SECTION THREE' This Ordinance shall be ~n i~ll force and effect 'from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVEDthis day of ,2003. ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President H \GEN\files\WIN\ORDINANC\dev code 1850 wgolf road apnl 2003 doc Proposed 3-Lot Subdivision 137.76' 111 i .......... 275.5 t.~[~ .......................... o N89'46'33'E 68 87' LOT 1 14,346 SQ. FT.,~ 13776' 68 88' LOT 2 15,825 SQ. FT. illage of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illino,$ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: DATE: VILLAGE MANAGER APRIL 11,2003 SUBJECT: LIBRARY GROUND LEASE As you recall, the Village and the Mount Prospect Public Library entered into a long- term Ground Lease late in 2002, which provided for, among other things, the construction of a municipal Parking Deck on a portion of Library property. ,In the succeeding months, construction of the Deck has commenced and continues today. The Ground Lease calls for the payment of base rent in the amount of $1.00 per year. The Lease also requires on an annual basis, the parties certify that both sides are in substantial compliance with all material terms of the Lease. The attached Resolution prowdes for the'payment of base rent along w~th certification of compliance. The Library Board will be adopting a similar Resolution at their upcoming Board meeting. In the future, this Resolution will appear on the first Village Board meeting each December during the term of the Lease. MEJ/rcc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO THE MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GROUND LEASE WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the Vdlage of Mount Prospect ("Vdlage") and the Mount Prospect Public Library ("L~brary") entered into a Ground Lease Agreement ("Lease") providing, among other things, for the Vdlage to lease certain property ("Property") from the Library, and WHEREAS, the Vdlage has caused ~ts attorney and staff to review the terms of the Lease and the current status of the Property and its usage, and WHEREAS, the attorney and staff have 'r~ported that both the V~llage and the L~brary are in substantial compliance w~th all material terms of the Lease, and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that ~t ~s ~n the best interests of the V~llage and ~ts residents to assure that there is continued comphance w~th the Lease NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the par-bes are in substantial comphance with all material terms of the Lease, SECTION TWO: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees authorize the Vdlage Finance Director to pay the Library such sums as are due pursuant to the Lease SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided by law AYES NAYS Passed and approved this .__ day of April 2003 ATTEST. Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma W Lowe V~llage Clerk