HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/09/1996 COW agenda COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday, April 9, 1996
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL
II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF MARCH 26, 1996
III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IV. COMMERCIAL VEHICLES PARKED AND STORED IN RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS/CONTINUED DISCUSSION
The Village Zoning Ordinance currently includes provisions allowing residential
homeowners to store their commercial vehicles on their property within their garage.
However, during a recent Court case, the Court ruled that the Village's Zoning
Ordinance does not adequately define what constitutes a commercial vehicle. As a
result, the Court concluded that the Village's provisions for commercial vehicle
storage was also inadequate and therefore not enforceable.
In order for the Village to be able to regulate commercial vehicles, it must establish a
detailed definition that clearly delineates what constitutes a commercial vehicle.
Given that the existing Code is not enforceable, this is an opportune time for the
Village to review, create or reinstate provisions regulating the storage of these
commercial vehicles within Residential Zoning Districts.
The attached memorandum provides an analysis of the existing and proposed
commercial vehicle storage provisions. It also includes a matrix which illustrates
different types of trucks and vans which fall within the motor vehicle industry's
category for commercial vehicles. This memorandum is a continuation of staff's
discussions originally submitted to the Committee of the Whole in a memo dated
August 7, 1995.
On September 26, 1995, staff presented proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments
to the Committee of the Whole. Staff's recommendation was that Section 14.2208
be amended to include a specific definition for commercial vehicles. It was staff's
belief that the original intention of the Code remain as follows: To permit a
commercial vehicle less than 8,000 pounds to be stored within a residential garage
and to prohibit storage of commercial vehicles greater than 8,001 pounds to be
stored within a residential garage unless a Conditional Use Permit is secured.
NOTE:ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE
OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE,
SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 100 SOUTH
EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056, 847/392-6000,
EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064.
The purpose of the current Codes regulating commercial vehicles is to provide
Village residents access to and storage of commercial vehicles without negatively
impacting the character of the Village's residential neighborhoods. The current
Code attempted to do so by establishing the following objectives:
1. Maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods by prohibiting
commercial vehicles within the front yard setbacks of homes by
requiring that these vehicles be parked within the garage.
2. Limiting commercial vehicle storage to a weight and size similar to that
of a regular passenger vehicle.
3. Regulating and preventing the construction of oversized garages
needed to accommodate large commercial vehicles.
After a thorough review of the existing Ordinance's intent and discussion with the
Committee of the Whole, Zoning Board of Appeals and the public, staff believes that
maintaining existing Code requirements would best serve Village residents by
allowing individuals the ability to keep their commercial vehicle on their property
within a garage while maintaining the character of the Village's residential
neighborhoods. The Village may wish to consider eliminating the ability to obtain a
Conditional Use for vehicles which require larger than standard size garages given
the impact these garages have on the aesthetics of a neighborhood.
Notice of this discussion has been sent to citizens who have previously expressed
interest in this topic. Appropriate staff will be available to answer questions and
facilitate discussion.
V. MANAGER'S REPORT
VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Vii. ADJOURNMENT
CLOSED SESSION
Litigation 51LCS 120/2 (c) (11)