Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. NEW BUSINESS 9/17/02 illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR 6-MONTH EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL USE ORDINANCE NO. 5096 Attached to this memorandum is a request from Patrick K. Callero, President of the Mil-De Corporation, requesting a 6-month extension of Conditional Use Ordinance No. 5096. The Conditional Use Ordinance granted the right to construct a drive-through restaurant at 820 E. Rand Road (originally for a Taco Bell, now for a Baskin Robbins/Dunkin Donuts/TOGO's). Staff supports the request for the 6-month extension. The petitioner has been working with staff and several adjacent property owners to finalize details relating to cross access easements. Once completed, the easements will formalize a series of access drives between the subject property, Menards and the Brunswick Zone. All issues relating to the easements are nearly resolved and therefore the project should move forward in the near future. The building permit for the project is ready to be issued subject to completion of the easement agreement. PleaSe forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 17~ meeting. Staff will be present at that meeting to answer any questions related to this matter. WilliaN~J.~ Jr. IL-DE Ooi PEIRATIn N September 9, 2002 Mr. William J. Cooney, Jr. Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Via Facsimile Transmission (847) 818.-5329 and Federal Express (847) 818-5328 · Re: 820 E. Rand Road Dear Mr. Cooney: As you know Mil-De Corporation is the owner of 820 E. Rand Road. On March 22, 2000 the Village approved Ordinance 5096 granting a Conditional Use for a drive-thru restaurant and parking and setback variations. Previously the Village extended the conditional use permit initially to March 20, 2002 and earlier this year the conditional use permit was extended to September 22, 2002. Also you are aware we have a Lease with Allied Domecq QSR to lease the premises for use as a Dunkin'Donuts/Baskin-Robbins/ Togo's Shop, which Lease is subject to obtaining governmental approval of the proposed use. The tenant's use of the premises would be consistent with the existing conditionai use permit. We respectfully request the Village extend the Conditional Use permit for an additional six months with the condition that substantial construction be underway and completed within six months thereafter. Very truly yours, MIL-DE CORPORATION By: Patrick K. Callero, President V~NL 9/11/02 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5096 GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 820 EAST RAND ROAD WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois did adopt Ordinance No. 5096 entitled '%n Ordinance Granting a Conditional Use In The Nature Of A Planned Unit Development And Variation For Property Commonly Known As 820 East Rand Road ' at their regular meeting held March 22, 2000; and WHEREAS, as set forth in Chapter 14, Section 14.203.F.12, the Conditional Use Permit and Variation granted through the passage of Ordinance No. 5096, the Conditional Use permit shall expire if the Conditional Use permit ceases for more than twelve (12) months for any reason; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested that the one (1) year effective date, established with the passage of Ordinance No. 5096, and subsequently extended for one (1) year at the April 17, 2001 meeting of the Mount Prospect Village Board, be extended for an additional six (6) months. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact bythe President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mo.unt Prospect. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 5096 is hereby amended by extending the effective date for the Conditional Use permit and Variation being the subject of Ordinance No. 5096 for six months. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by]aw. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald b Farley, Village President Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk illage of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEI~OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES VILLAGE MANAGER SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 2003 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SHORTFALL At the recent 2003 Pre-BL]dget Workshop, staff identified an approximate $1.25 million General Fund deficit for next year. Approximately one-half of the deficit was driven in large part by the economic downturn and corresponding reductions in certain revenue streams. At that time, the Village Board directed staff to take a hard look at expenditure reductions in an effort to hoed the line. Staff has identified approximately $600,000 in potential General Fund expenditure reductions. Some of the guidelines employed in preparation of the 2003 Budget inciuded: 1) Maintaining non-personnel related spending at 2002 levels wherever possible, 2) deferring or eliminating non-essential capital projects, 3)modest reductions in general infrastructure maintenance initia{ives and 4) the prohibition on new programs, or personnel. Further expenditure reductions will require substantial service and staff reductions. This is inevitable given that Mount Prospect municipal staffing levels are already one of the lowest in the northwest suburbs. The Village has three basic options for eliminating the General Fund deficit: 1) Eliminate deficit entirely through expenditure, service and staff reductions, 2) generate sufficient revenues to cover the shortfall, or 3) utilize a combination of staff.reductions and either draw down on excess General Fund fund balance or fill the gap with new revenues. In line with these scenarios, the Village Board will consider at the September 17 Village Board meeting, an Ordinance that would raise the Home Rub Sales Tax by one-quarter of one percent. This would generate an estimated $1.3 mill.ion annually in additional funds. With regard to drawing down on General Fund fund balance, over the past several years, the Vii[age Board has built on its General Fund surplus from approximately '17% to a projected fund balane of 26.7%. This was done to serve as a cushion during soft economic times or to cover unforeseen catastrophic losses. Drawing down General Fund fund balance by approximately $600,000 would reduce the surplus from approximately 26.7% of annual expenditures to 24.7%. All of the Budget balancing options outlined above are viable. Staff will seek Village Board direction on how to approach final preparation of the 2003 Budget. MEJ/rcc ~IS c: Finance Director Douglas Ellsworth Assistant Village Manager David Strahl ~ / Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF FINANCE SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 HOME RULE SALES TAX PURPOSE: To present informatiOn relative to the Village's home rule sales tax. BACKGROUND: Illinois statutes allow home-rule municipalities to impose a home rule retailers' occupation tax and home rule service occupation tax ("home rule sales tax") in one-quarter percent increments. In 1991 the Village established a one-quarter percent home rule sales tax to fund flood control projects (Ordinance No. 4275). That tax took effect September 1, 1991. In 1994 the Village increased the home rule sales tax rate to one-half of one percent effective January 1,1995 (Ordinance No. 4613). The second one- quarter percent increment was earmarked for street improvements. DISCUSSION: State statute permits the.municipal home rule sales tax to be imposed only on general merchandise. It cannot be imposed upon groceries, drugs and medical appliances, or titled property such as automobiles. Our current one-half of one percent home rule sales tax is expected to generate $2.6 million in 2003. This is down from a high of $3.4 million reached in 2000. Therefore, an increase to three-quarters of one percent would generate an estimated $1.3 million of additional revenue. Currently, on the purchase of general merchandise in Mount Prospect customers pay a total sales tax rate of 8.25%. The rate can be broken down as follows: State of Illinois 6.25% (1) RTA 0.75% Cook County Home Rule 0.75% Mount Prospect Home Rule 0.50% 8.25% (1) Of the 6.25%, Mount Prospect receives 1% from the State. ome Rule Sales Tax September 11, 2002 Page 2 On the purchase of prepared food and beverages, a consumer pays an additional 1%, which is our food and beverage tax. On the purchase of groceries and drugs the consumer pays 2%, of which 1% comes to the Village and 1% goes to the RTA. The majority of home rule municipalities in our area have imposed a one-half of one percent home rule sales tax. Evanston, Niles and Skokie have had a three-quarter of one percent tax rate for at least two years. Given the economy and the state of municipal budgets, several communities have recently, or are in the process of, adopting ordinances increasing their tax rate to three-quarters of one percent. These include Des Plaines, Morton Grove, and Elk Grove Village. Home rule municipalities are permitted to impose, amend or abolish their home rule sales st st tax twice each year, January 1 and July 1 . To do so, an ordinance must be filed with the Illinois Department of Revenue no later than October 1st and April 1st, respectively. DIRECTOR OF FINANCE DRE/ h\Taxes\Home Rule Sales~Administration\lncrease memo 9-11-02.doc HJMIBH ORDINANCENO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 8.1102 AND SECTION 8.1202 OF APPENDIX A - DIVISION II ENTITLED "FEES, RATES AND TAXES" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS, INCREASING THE HOME RULE RETAILERS' OCCUPATION TAX AND THE HOME RULE SERVICE OCCUPATION TAX NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE: Chapter 8, Sections 8.1102 and 8.1202 of Appendix A - Division II, entitled "Fees, Rates and Taxes" is hereby amended as fellows: . A., The current 8.1102 shall be deleted and replaced with a new Section 8.1102 to read as follows: IMPOSITION OF TAX: Home Rule Retailers' Occupation Tax: 0.75% of gross receipts of sales of tangible personal property. B. The current 8.1202 shall be deleted and replaced with a new Section 8.1202 to read as follows: IMPOSITION OF TAX: Home Rule Service Occupation Tax: 0.75% of gross receipts of sales of services. SECTION TWO: The Vii]age Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Illinois Department of Revenue on or before the last day of September, 2002. SECTION THREE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its Passage approval, and publication in pamphlet form in accordance with law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk H;\G EN~files~WIN\O RDI N A NC\H o me Rule Sale sTaxIn c~-ease,Sept ,02 .doc Gerald L. Farley, Village President ~"~~ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS PROJECT ENGINEER SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 SEPTEMBER SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING YIELD SIGNS ON PI~E STREET AT SttABONEE TRAIL The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to ./ approve Yield signs on Pine Street at Shabonee Trail. Ms. Susan Coz/ne, 423 S. Pine Street, lives at the northeast corner of the intersection and believes many motorists are not aware it is an uncontrolled intersection since ali of the other intersections along Shabonee Trail in the area have either Stop or Yield signs. She is aware of multiple accidents in recent years and is concerned for the safety of the families with young children in the area. Ms. Cozine submitted a petition to the Village requesting consideration for Stop or Yield signs at the intersec;ion of Pine Street and Shabonee Trail. In August 2002, Staff performed a traffic study of the intersection. Results show there have been three accidents at the intersection over the past t~vo years. Also, there are approximately 900 vehicles per da.x (250 on Pine Street and 650 on Shabonee Trail) that enter the intersection. Average recorded speeds along both streets are beloxv the 25mph speed limit. Finally, while there are no sight obstructions immediately at any of the corners, landscaping near the homes and even the homes themselves are close to the comers and may make it difficult for motorists to react to a vehicle approaching on the cross stree: and avoid a collision. Staff sent out 21 surveys to residents who live within 200' of the intersection per the Notification ?olicy t0 surveys C/ere returned and all favored either Stop or Yield signs because of speeding motorists along Shabonee Trail and the concern for possibly more accidents at the intersection. This issue was discussed at the September 9, 2002 Safety Commission Meeting. The petitioner, Ms. Cozine, was the only resident present to speak on the issue. Commission members determined Stop signs were not warranted at the intersection but supported Yield signs on the minor street (Pine Street) in order to clarify the right-of-way. By a vote of 8-0, the Safety Commission recommends to install Yield signs (Section 18.2004B of the Village Code) for northbound and southbound Pine Street at Shabonee Trail. age two,., September 12, 2002 September Safety Commission Please include this item on the September 17th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting as well as a location map for your reference. Matthew P. Lawrie cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:\files\engineer\traffic~safecomm~recs&rninXsept02rec.doc PINE STREET & SHABDNEE TRAIL TRAFFIC STUDY SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 TRAFFIC SI6NAL STOP SIGN YIELD SIGN E~ D STU] hREi Glen R. Andler Sean ~ Dorsey Phone 847/870-5640 R0derick T O'O0n0van Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Fax 847/253-9377 Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Sandra M. Clerk TDD 847/3@2-1235 MINUTES OF TffE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION DRAFT CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting .of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:05 p.m. on Monday, September 9, 2002. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Absent: Others in Attendance: Chuck Bencic '. Lee Beening Joan Bjork Carol Tortorello John Dahlberg Buz Livingston Paul Bure~ Matt Lawrie John Keane Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Police Department Fire Department Public Works Public Works/Engineering Division CommiSsioner See attached attendance sheet APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Tort°rello, seconded by Mr. Bures, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Safety Commission held on June 10, 2002. The minutes were approved by a vote of 7-0. Commissioner Keane arrived at 7:1 Opm. ] Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Mr. Chris Lenz, 214 S. Louis Street, wanted to thank Commissioner Beening for his years of service on the Safety Commission and his dedication to the Village. No further citizens came forth to discuss any topics that were not on the current agenda. OLD BUSINESS A) NO TURN ON RED ~IGNS IN DOWNTOWN 1) Background Information At the June I0, 2002 Safety Commission Meeting, Mr. Norm Kurtz of 32 W. Busse Avenue requested the Commission consider posting No Turn on Red When Pedestrians Are Present signs in the downtown area to enhance safety for pedestrians. Staff was asked to inspect the area and provide the information back to the Commission. No Turn on Red signs exist for northbound and southbound Route 83 at Northwest Highway and for westbound Prospect Avenue at Route 83. No other such signs exist in the downtown area. Any new signs along Route 83 or Northwest Highway would have to be installed by :[DOT as they have jurisdiction of the roads. The Village has jurisdiction over Emerson Street and Prospect Avenue. 2) Discussion Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided a brief overview of the existing No Turn on Red signs in the do~vntown area. Chairman Bencic asked if the Village has had other similar requests or concerns raised by other residents. Both Traffic Engineer Lawrie and Commander Dahlberg responded they were not aware of any recent incidences. After some more discussion, it was decided the issue should be revisited after more development of the downtown area has occurred. Commissioner Keane, seconded by Commissioner Bjork, moved to not take any action at this time but to have Staff monitor the issue over the next year and bring the item back to the Safety Commission in one year. The motion was approved by a vote of 8-0. 2 B) 1) SEE-GWUN AVENUE TRAFFIC Discussion Chairman Bencic provided Traffic Engineer La~vrie some traffic count data he gathered on July 23, 2002 while meeting with the resident at 502 See-Gwun Avenue. Other than one particular vehicle, the traffic volume and speed appeared to be typical for residential streets. Commissioner Keane too had spent some time observing traffic and did not See anything unordinary. Commander Dahlberg noted the Police Department has dedicated a significant amount of time monitoring traffic speed along See-O,,vun Avenue and officers have not seen an issue. Traffic Engineer Lawrie responded that Staff is planning to restudy the issue the week of September 16th. No more discussion took place on this issue. NEW BUSINESS A) REQUEST FOR TWO-WAY STREET DESIGNATION ALONG MAIN STREET 1) Background Information The driveway at 317 S. Main Street has direct access to Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street. The block is currently posted one-way northbound. The property to the north has direct access to Route 83 and the property to the south has direct access to Lincoln Street. Mr. David Baird, '317. S. Main S3reet, requested that the block become a two-way street so that he may have the opportunity to travel south on Main Street. 2) StaffStudy Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street is an asphalt road with curb and gutter. The width of the road is 25'. The block is posted one-way northbound. Also, there are No Left Tz~rn signs posted for southbound Route 83 at Main Street and No Right Turn signs posted for northbound Route 83 at Main Street. In addition, left turns are prohibited for northbound Main Street traffic at Route 83 and at Lincoln Street. Finally, parking is prohibited on the east side of the block and 2-hr parking is allowed on the west side. Legally, the property owner at 317 S. Main Street must drive northbound when exiting the driveway. At Route 83, the property owner can then only head northbound. This becomes an inconvenience when the destination is south of the house. The road is wide enough to handle two-way traffic. Therefore, to make it more convenient, it is reasonable to allow this block to be a two-way street designation. The Sole benefit would be to provide the opportunity for the property owner to head south on Main Street to easier access the community. The turn prohibition signs on Route 83 would remain in place so as to not create a potential unsafe situation with turning vehicles at the intersection. At the intersection of Main Street & Lincoln Street, stop signs are posted for northbound. eastbound and westbound traffic. By allowing two-way traffic on Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street, a stop sign should be posted for southbound traffic as well. 3) 4) A survey was not distributed as the property owner at 317 S. Main Street is the only affected party. Recommendation Based on the study performed by Staff: The Village Traffic Engineer recommends approval of eliminating the one-way street designation along Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street and making it a two- way street designation; and installing a stop sign on southbound Main Street at Lincoln Street. Discussion Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided an overview of the report to the Commission. Commissioner Beening commented that with parking prohibited on the east side of the street along this block, allowing two-way traffic would require vehicles to be facing southbound when parked on the west side. This may be confusing as some motorists would continue to face northbound and park on the west side and others may turn around using the driveway at 317 S. Main Street and face southbound. Chaiman Bencic opened up the discussion to the audience. No one spoke on the issue. Chairman Bencic brought the issue back to the Cornnfission. There was some discussion about the turn restrictions at the intersection of Route 83 and Main Street. It was decided that these signs would be left in place and no changes made. Chairman Bencic questioned whether a No Right Turn sign should be posted for southbound Main Street and Lincoln Street if the two-way street designation is approved. Traffic Engineer Lawrie ageed. There was some more discussion about mo~difying the parking restrictions for the block to make it safer for motorists. Also, after some discussion, it was decided no changes would be made concerning the driveway at 315 S. Main Street. Mr. Bures, seconded by Commissioner Beening, moved to approve eliminating the one-tvay street designation along Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street and make it a two-way street designation; installing a stop sign and No Right Turn sign on southbound Main Street at Lincoln Street; prohibiting parking on the west side of Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street at all times; and restricting parking to 2 hours on the east side of Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street. The motion was approved by a vote of 8-0. B) 1) 2) REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLUMBINE DR.IVE, LARCH DPdVE AND ONEIDA LANE Background Information Mr. Jim DeMar, 1515 N. Larch Drive, is concerned with cut through traffic and would like to see 3-way stop signs at the intersection. He believes the new train station along Wolf Road south of Camp McDonald Road is the source of increased traffic in the neighborhood. His neighbors have also voiced concern over vehicle speeds and lack of courtesy by motorists. StaffStudy The Engineering Staff performed a traffic study including reviewing accident reports, gathering volume and speed data, identifying sight obstructions near the intersection, surveying the residents and monitoring cut through traffic. There have been zero recorded accidents the intersection over the past five years. Representative speed surveys were performed at ali three legs of the intersection between July 26th and August 2nd, and between August 16~ and 23~d. The average speeds varied between 18- 21mph and the 85°~ percentile speeds varied between 23-26mph. The speed limit on all three streets is 25mph. Based on the results, there doesn't appear to be an overall speeding problem. However, the data did show some motorists did drive above the speed limit as is evident on most residential streets. Traffic volume data was gathered in July and August. Based on the results, there are approximately 700 vehicles per day that enter the intersection. 350 vehicles travel on Columbine Drive, 110 vehicles on Larch Drive and 240 vehicles on Oneida Lane. The peak hour of the day (typically 5pm-6pm) experiences approximately 60 vehicles that enter the intersection. A total of 14 surveys were sent out in August 2002 to collect the residents' comments on this request. 4 surveys (29%) were returned to the Village. 2 of the responses supported Stop signs because of close calls at the intersection and the other 2 responses opposed any signs because of the lack of traffic. Based on an inspection of the intersection, there is not any landscaping at any of the comers causing a severe sight obstruction. However, since this is an uncontrolled intersection, there is to be sufficient stopping sight distance for all three legs of the intersection. Stopping sight distance is the distance a vehicle travels from the point when a motorist sees an approaching vehicle on the cross street, reacts and comes to a full stop. A motorist should have enough clear vision to be able to stop, if necessary, before reaching the intersection. Our measurements show there aren't any sight obstructions near the intersection that should interfere in allowing a motorist to come to a full stop before reaching the intersection if necessary. The fact there hasn't been any accidents over the past 5 years supports this determination. The petitioner claims many motorists are avoiding the traffic signals at Camp McDonald Road and Wolf Road during peak travel times. As a result, the neighborhood is experiencing cut through traffic. Looking at the volume data, it appears the peak afternoon hour (5pm-6pm) experiences approximately 15 vehicles traveling north on Columbine Drive and turning left onto 5 3) Larch Drive. The same volume is seen for motorists traveling east on Larch Drive and turning right onto Columbine Drive. This is not a significant amount of traffic. Aisc, many of the motorists may live in the neighborhood or have reason to be traveling on the streets. This leaves only a few motorists possibly cutting through the neighborhood. Since the volume data was collected in the summer, most of the arterial streets such as Camp McDonald Road and Wolf Road typically experience below average volume. Cut through traffic may have been minimal during the study if the arterial streets did not experience significant back-ups during peak travel times. Should there be more cut through traffic at different times of the year, No Thru Traffic signs can be effective. While not necessarily enforceable by the Police Department since the streets in the neighborhood are public streets, the signs do deter some motorists from cutting through. Recommendation 3-way Stop signs are normally warranted at intersections where there is a condition of severely restricted view, accidents or a significant amount of vehicles and pedestrians. Based on an inspection, there are not any sight obstructions immediately at the intersection that would cause a full stop to be necessary at all times for all four directions. In addition, there have been 0 accidents 'over the past 5 years. In order to meet the criterion for a multiway stop sign installation, there is to be 3 accidents in a 12-month period. Fir~ally, the peak hour of the day experiences approxi~nately 60 Vefifcles entering the intersection. In brdbr :to meet the criterion; the volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches is to average 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of the day and 200 vehicles per hour for the same 8 hours from the minor street approaches. Based on the data, 4-way Stop signs are not warranted at this intersection. I-way or 2-way Stop signs are normally warranted at intersections where the criteria for a 4-way Stop sign installation is not met but where a full stop is necessary at all times on one street in order to clarify the right-of-way. As stated above, there are not any sight obstructions immediately adjacent to the intersection that would cause a motorist to have to come to a full stop in order to safely proceed through the intersection. Also, there is not a significant amount of traffic at the intersection. A routine motorist may become accustomed to not seeing any traffic at the legs of the intersection. This, in mm, may result in disobedience of a full stop by motorists creating a potential safety concern for other motorists and pedestrians. Motorists may also feel the need to make up for "lost" time after stopping at the intersection resulting in higher speeds at the midblock. Based on the existing conditions, 1-way or 2-way Stop signs are not recommended at this intersection. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should be given to using less restrictive measures such as Yield signs. Yield signs assign right-of-way to traffic when the normal right-of-way rule appears to not be effective. 0 accidents in the past 5 years appears to reveal that motorists are safely negotiating driving through the intersection without Stop or Yield signs. Based on the speed data, motorists appear to have sufficient clear vision to come to a full stop before reaching the intersection if necessary. Based on the existing conditions, Yield signs are not recommended at this intersection. 6 4) Based on the traffic study performed by Staff, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: denial of Stop or Yield signs at the intersection; but approval of a No Thru Traffic sign at Camp McDonald Road and Columbine Drive. Discussion Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided an overview of the report to the Commissionl Commissioner Bencic opened up the discussion to the audience. Mr. Jim DeMar, 1515 N. Larch Drive, provided a brief power point presentation detailing his concerns with vehicle speed and cut through traffic, and emphasizing the need for 3-way stop signs at the intersection. Chairman Bencic brought the issue back to the Commission. Commissioner Beening commented that he believed Metra was planning to double the number of train stops at the Prospect Heights station over the next five years. He also mentioned he thought the bus stopg at the intersection were after the morning rush hour. Commissioner Beening explained to the audience how stop signs are not effective ir} controlling a speeding issue. Motorists may actually increase speed past the intersection to make up for "lost time". Commander Dahlberg said the intersection of Basswood and Cree is a similar configuration to this intersection and has 3-way stop signs. He suggested that Mr. DeMar spend time watching traffic at that intersection and watch the number of motorists who disobey the stop signs. Stop signs are only effective when people obey them. That may be why the standards are so high to warrant 3-way stop signs explained Commander Dahlberg. He offered to have an officer meet with Mr. DeMar to monitor traffic speed to identify if there is a speeding issue. Chairman Bencic commented that stop signs at unwarranted locations can provide a false sense of security to pedestrians. Since the intersection has a bus stop, a child may cross the street assuming a motorist will stop if there is a sign posted. The safety of the child may be compromised if the motorist is used to not stopping at the sign. Traffic Engineer Lawrie explained the warrants for stop signs and how accidents are seen at intersections that have stop signs that may not be warranted. He also explained ~vhy uncontrolled intersections may be the appropriate decision if there is low traff~c volume, Iow speeds and sufficient vision for motorists to react to oncoming vehicles. Mr. Bures noted that some issues are revisited as conditions change. With more and more trains in the future, the traffic in the neighborhood may change. However, based on the current study, stop signs are not warranted. Mr. Bures stated the Commission does not want to approve something that could possibly create even more problems. Some discussion took place regarding speed enforcement tactics such as use of the speed trailer, drone cars and actual radar enforcement to control any speeding concerns. Commander Dahlberg will set up a schedule and involve Mr. DeMar in the process. Commissioner Beening, seconded by Commissioner Keane, moved to deny Stop or Yield signs at the intersection; approve a No Thru Traffic sign at Camp McDonald Road and Columbine Drive; have Staff contact the City of Prospect Heights and request a No Thru Traffic sign be installed at Wolf Road and Alderman Avenue; and revisit the issue in a year. The motion was approved by a vote of 8-0. c) 2) REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF PiNE STREET AND SHABONEE TRAIL Background Information Ms. Susan Cozine, 423 S. Pine Street, lives at the northeast comer of the intersection and believes many motorists are not aware it is an uncontrolled intersection since all of the other intersections along Shabonee Trail in the area have either Stop or Yield signs. She is aware of multiple accidents in recent years and is concerned for the safety of the families with young children in the area. Staff Study The Engineering Staff performed a traffic study including reviewing accident reports, gathering volume and speed data, identifying sight obstructions near the intersection and surveying the residents. There have been three recorded accidents the intersection over the past two years. Representative speed surveys were performed at all four legs of the intersection between August 16th and 23fa. The average speeds varied between 20~2mph and the 85th percentile speeds varied between 25-30mph. The speed limit on Pine Street and Shabonee Trail is 25mph. Based on the results, there doesn't appear to be an overall speeding problem. However, the data did show some motorists did drive above the speed limit as is evident on most residential streets. Traffic volume data was gathered in August. Based on the results, there are approximately 900 vehicles per day that enter the intersection. 250 vehicles travel on Pine Street and 650 vehicles on Shabonee Trail. The peak hour of the day (typically 5pm-6pm) experiences approximately 100 vehicles that enter the intersection. A total of 21 surveys were sent out in August 2002 to collect the residents' comments on this request. 10 surveys (48%) were returned to the Village. All of the responses favored either Stop or Yield signs because of speeding motorists along the streets and many children living in the neighborhood. 8 3) Based on an inspection of the intersectioh, there is not any landscaping at any of the comers causing a severe sight obstruction. However, since this is an uncontrolled intersection, there is to be sufficient stopping sight distance for all four legs of the intersection. Stopping sight distance is the distance a vehicle travels from the point when a motorist sees an approaching vehicle on the cross street, reacts and comes to a full stop. A motorist should have enough clear vision to be able to stop, if necessary, before reaching the intersection. Our measurements show landscaping near the homes and even the homes themselves at the intersection may not provide sufficient stopping sight distance for motorists. Therefore, Stop or Yield signs would assist in clarifying the right-of-way and possibly reduce the potential for an accident. Recommendation 4-way Stop signs are normally warranted at intersections where there is a condition of severely restricted view, accidents or a significant amount of vehicles and pedestrians. Based on an inspection, there are not any sight obstructions immediately at the intersection that would cause a full stop to be necessary at all times for ail four directions. In addition, there have been 3 accidents over the past 2 years. In order to meet the criterion for a multiway stop sign installation, there is to be 5 accidents in a 12~month period. Finally; the peak hour of the day experiences approximately 100 vehicles entering the intersection. In order to meet the criterion, the volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) is to average 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of the day and 200 vehicles per hour for the same 8 hours from the minor street approaches. Based on the data, 4-way Stop signs are not warranted at this intersection. 2-way Stop signs are normally warranted at intersections where the criteria for a 4-way Stop sign installation is not met but where a full stop is necessary at all times on one street in order to clarify the right-of-way. As stated above, there are not any sight obstructions immediately adjacent to the intersection that would cause a motorist to have to come to a full stop in order to safely proceed through the intersection. Also, there is not a significant amount of traffic on the major street (Shabonee Trail) during the day. A routine motorist on the minor street (Pine Street) may become accustomed to not seeing any traffic on Shabonee Trail at the intersection. This, in mm, may result in disobedience of a full stop by motorists creating a potential safety concern for other motorists and pedestrians. Motorists on Pine Street may also feel the need to make up for "lost" time after stopping at the intersection resulting in higher speeds at the midblock. Based on the existing conditions, 2-way Stop signs are not recommended at this intersection. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should be given to using less restrictive measures such as Yield signs. Yield signs assign right-of-way to traffic when the normal right-of-way rule appears to not be effective. 3 accidents in the past 2 years reveal this may be the case. Also, the speed data shows that because of the proximity of the homes to the intersection, motorists may not have enough time to see other vehicles on the cross street, react and stop before reaching the intersection. Motorists controlled by Yield signs would need to slow down before reaching the intersection resulting in a shorter distance to come to a full stop if necessary. Finally, when installed, Yield signs should be placed on the minor street. Similar to unwarranted Stop signs, Yield signs on major streets may lead to disobedience by routine motorists creating a potential safety concern. 9 4) Based on the traffic study performed by Staff, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: approval of Yield signs on Pine Street at Shabonee Trail. Discussion Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided an overview of the report to the Commission. Commissioner Bencic opened up the discussion to the audience. Ms. Susan Cozine, 423 S. Pine Street, said that between Route 83 and the park district pool, all of the intersections along Shabonee Trail are controlled by either Stop or Yield sig-ns except for Pine Street. Many motorists traveling Shabonee Trail assume Pine Street traffic will stop. She explained there are many children living near the intersection and there have been recent accidents. Chairman Bencic brought the issue back to the Commission. Commander Dahlberg noted that two of the three accidents involved residents in the neighborhood. Even though these motorists are aware this is an uncontrolled intersection, it supports the belief there may be a sight obstruction issue that reduces the reaction time to avoid a collision. Commissioner Bjork, seconded by Mr. Bures, moved to approve Yield signs on Pine Street at Shabonee Trail. The motion was approved by a vote of 8-0. COMMISSION ISSUES Chairman Bencic acknowledged this is Commissioner Beening's last meeting as he is moving to Indiana. He thanked him for his years of service on the Commission and to the Village. Traffic Engineer Lawrie presented Commissioner Beening a couple of street name signs with his and his wife's name on them as a token of the Village's appreciation. Chairman Bencic. asked each of the Commissioners to consider a new Vice Chairman as Commissioner Beening is retiring. He asked that they approve a new Vice Chairman at the next regular meeting. No other Safety Commission items were brought forth at this time. 10 DJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 8-0 to adjourn at 8:45 p.m. upon the motion of Commissioner Keane. Commissioner Tortorello seconded the motion. Respectfully submitted, Matthew P. Lawrie, P.E. Traffic Engineer x :\files\engineerXsa fecomm\traffich'ecs&minXsept02min.doc NAME VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY CDMMISSIDN MEETING ATTENDANCE SHEET September 9, 2002 7:30 P.M. ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2004.B of"SCHEDULE IV- STOP AND YIELD. SIGNS" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Moun[ Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Pine Street - North and southbound - Shabonee Trail" so that hereinafter said Section 18.2004.B of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall include the following: "Name of Street Pine Street Direction of Traffic Movement North and Southbound At Intersection With Shabonee Trail." ,SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by la~. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING TWO-WAY STREET DESIGNATION ALONG MAIN sTREET The Safety Commission transnfits their recommendation to approve eliminating the one-way street designation along Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street and make it a two-way street designation; installing a Stop sign and No Right Turn sign on southbound Main Street at Lincoln Street; prohibiting parking on the west side of Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street at all times; and restricting parking to 2 hours on the east side of Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street. The block of Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street is currently posted one-way northbound. Mr. David Baird, 317 S. Main Street, requested to the Village that the block become a two-way street so that he may have the opportunity to travel south on Main Street to easier access the community. The dr/veway at 317 S. Main Street has direct access to Main Street. The property to the north has direct access to Route 83 and the property to the south has direct access to Lincoln Street. Legally, the resident at 317 S. Main Street must drive northbound when exiting the driveway. At Route 83, the resident can then only head northbound. This becomes an inconvenience to the resident when the destination is south of his house. ,' Th/s issue was discussed at the September 9, 2002 Safety Commission Meeting. Mr. Baird was not in attendance at the meeting. Commission members agreed this was an inconvenience to the resident. They also considered other factors should it be recommended to the Village Board that the street become two- way. First, no action should be taken with any of the signs in the area. In particular, Route 83 traffic should still not be permitted to turn onto southbound Main Street. Second, with permitting southbound traffic for the block, a Stop sign and No Right Turn sign should be posted for southbound Main Street at Lincoln Street. Finally, the current parking restrictions for both sides of the street should be switched. Signs on the west side currently restrict parking to two hours. Signs on the east side currently prohibit parking at ail times. Permitting two-way traffic would require vehicles to be facing southbound when parked on the west side. The Commission members believed this may be confusing as some motorists would continue to face northbound and park on the west side and others may mm around using the driveway at 317 S. Main Street and face southbound. By a vote of 8-0, the Safety Commission recommends to: repeal the one-~vay northbound street designation for Main Street between Illinois Route 83 and Lincoln Street (Section 18.2003 of the Village Code) age two... September 12, 2002 September Safety Commission repeal the 2-hour parking restriction along the west side of Main Street between Route 83 and Lincoln Street (Section 18.2011B of the Village Code) install a Stop sign for southbound Main Street at Lincoln Street (Section 18.2004A of the Village Code) install a No Right Turn sign for southbound Main Street at Lincoln Street (Section 18.2002 of the Village Code) install 2-hour parking signs along the east side of Main Street between Illinois Route 83 and Lincoln Street (Section 18.2011B of the Village Code) install No Parking Any Time signs along the west side of Main Street between Illinois Route 83 and Lincoln Street (Section 18.2006 of the Village Code) While reviewing the parking restrictions as written in the Village Code, Staff discovered some irregularities between the identifications of Main Street, Lincoln Street, Oakton Street and Elmhurst Road as the road is called along Route 83. To clear up the confusion and provide a single name identification, Staff recommends to repeal the following parking restrictions and replace them with a single parking restriction: repeal the no parking restriction along the east and west sides of Elmhurst Avenue between Golf Road and Lincoln Street (Section 18.2006 of the Village Code) repeal the no parking restriction along the west side of Elmhurst Road between Golf Road and Oakton Street (Section 18.2006 of the Village Code) repeal the no parking restriction along the east and west sides of Elmhurst Road between Golf Road and Lincoln Street (Section 18.2006 of the Village Code) repeal the no parking restriction along the east and west sides of Elmhurst Road between Kensington Road and Camp McDonald Road (Section 18.2006 of the Village Code) repeal the no parking restriction along the east and west sides of Main Street between Lincoln Street and Kensington Road (Section 18.2006 of the Village Code) repeal the no parking restriction along the north and south sides of the entire jurisdiction of Oakton Street (Section 18.2006 of the Village Code) include a no parking restriction along both sides of Illinois Route 83 for the entire jurisdiction (Section 18.2006 of the Village Code) Please include this item on the September i7th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting as well asap fo~ys~ference. Matthew P. Lawrie cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:\files\engineer\trafficXsa fecorc?..'~ecs&rnin\sept02 tee,doc ,i kS 319I~ VWL ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XX OF CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2003 of"SCHEDULE III - ONE WAY STREETS" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by de!eting the following: "Name Direction of of Street Traffic Movement Description Main Street Northbound Btw. Lincoln St. and IlL Rte. 83." SECTION 'DNO: That Section 18.2011 .B of "SCHEDULE XI B" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: "Name Side · of Street of Street Main St. West Description Btw. III. Rte. 83 and Lincoln St." SECTION THREE: That Section 2004.A of "SCHEDULE IV - STOP AND YIELD SIGNS" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Main Street- Southbound - Lincoln Street," so that hereinafter said Section 2004.A of the Village Code shall include the following: "Name Direction of of Street Traffic Movement At .Intersection With -Main St. S(Juthbound Lincoln St." SECTION FOUR: That Section 2002 of"SCHEDULE II - PROHIBITED TURNS" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Main Street - Southbound - Right - Lincoln Street," so that hereinafter said Section 2002 of the Village Code shall include the foilowing: "Name Direction of Prohibited of Street Traffic Movement Turn Int0 Main Street Southbound Right Lincoln St." F Chapter 18, Pc>ute 83 Page 2/3 SECTION FIVE: That Section 20011.B of"SCHEDULE Xl B" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Main Street - East- Between III. Route 83 and Lincoln Street," so that hereinafter said Section 2011 .B of the Villag¢ Code shall include the following: "Name Side of Street of Street Description Main St. East Btw. III. Rte. 83 and Lincoln St." SECTION SlX: That Section 2006 of"SCHEDULE Vt - NO PARKING ANY TIME" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Main Street - West- Between IlL Route 83 and Lincoln Street," so that hereinafter said Section 2006 of the Village Code shall include the following: "Name Side of Street of Street Main Street West Description Btw. Ill. Rte. 83 and Lincoln St." SECTION SEVEN: That Section 18.2006 of "SCHEDULE VI - NO PARKING ANY TIME" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by de{eting the following: "Name of Street EImhurst Ave. Elmhurst Rd. Elmhurst Rd. Elmhurst Rd. Main St. Oakton St. Side of Street East and west West East and west East and west East and west North and south Descdption Btw. Golf Rd. and Lincoln St. Btw. Golf Rd, and Oakton St. Btw. Golf Rd. and Lincoln St. Btw. Kensington Rd. and Camp McDonald Rd. Btw. Kensington Rd. and Lincoln St. Enti~e jurisdiction." Chapter 18, Route 38 Page 3/3 SECTION EIGHT: That Section 2006 of"SCHEDULE VI - NO PARKING ANY TIME" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Illinois Route 83 - Both sides - Entire jurisdiction," so that hereinafter said Section 2006 of the Village Code shall include the following: "Name Side of Street .of Street Description III. Rte. 83 · Both sides Entire jurisdiction," SECTION NINE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk OFFICES K. LEIN~ THORPE AND JENKINS, LTD. P~U~ck ~. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Suig 1660 20 Nov, h Waeker DHw Chicago, I]linols 60606-2903 Telephone (312)984-6400 Facsimile (312) 984-6444 (312) 606-7077 MEMOR, AN,DUM Dave Strahl, Assistant Viflage Manager Village of Mount Prospect Everette M. Hill, Jr. April 24, 2002 Prohibit!on of EIFS Systems P, luda Y. Allhou You have asked for my opinion as to whether the Village may prohibit or restrict the use of Dryvit or EIFS systems for new construction in the Village. It is my opinion that such restrictions are permissible. It is well within the Village's home rule powers to set building code standards and prohibit the use of materials which are either unsafe or inappropriate for our weather conditions. The City of Chicago has long prohibited the use of PVC piping for any plumbing application. Other communities in the Chicago area and indeed some entire states ban the use of EIFS or Dryvit systems. You and I have discussed the possibility of banning such use entirety for residential applications, but of restricting and closely monitoring its use in commercial applications. Such a distinction between commercial and residential is permissible. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: Chapter 21, entitled "Building Code", Article II, General Provisions, of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding a new Section 21.233, "Use of Stucco or Engineered Stucco Systems" which shall be and read as follows: 21.233 Use of Stucco or Engineered Stucco Systems. The use of stucco or engineered stucco systems, including but not limited to those commonly as dryvit or eXterior.insulation and finish systems, (EIFS), is prohibited in the Vitlage. If a previously installed stucco or engineered stucco system extedor has deteriorated or is destroyed so that more than 50% of its coverage of the structure requires repair, then the existing stucco or system must be replaced with materials that are permitted pursuant to Village regulations. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect.from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Fadey Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk ount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: VEHICLE / EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 SUBJECT: 2002 NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE VEHICLE AUCTION As you ars aware, each year the Northwest Municipal Conference hosts two vehicle auctions in the fall. This year the Village of Mount Prospect will be hosting the second auction on October 19, 2002, at the Public Works Facility. Hosting this auction proves to be a great benefit to the Village and we have hosted the auction for several years. Thers is a 5% administration fee charged to the member commun!ties, but the host community is only charged a 2.5% administration fee. The Village will have ten (10) care, seven (7) trucks, and two (2) pieces of miscellaneous equipment that have been replaced and are available for the above-mentioned auction. Attached is an ordinance declaring the seventeen retired vehicles and two pieces of equipment surplus. With your concurrence, I would like to present this ordinance to the Mayor and Board of Trustees for their consideration at the September 17, 2002 Village Board Meeting. I concur, j Deputy Director of Public Works JG c: Director Glen R. Andler attachment X:\FILES\FRONTO FF~ORGANIZE~NWMC\NWMC2002AUCTION.DOC w4 9/10/02 ORDINANCENO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, it has been determined that it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain the personal property specified herein; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that the best interests of the Village would be served by the sale of the personal property at a public auction conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference, which auction will be held on Saturday, October 19, 2002 at 11:00 A.M. at the Mount Prospect Public Works Facility, 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 65 5/11-76-4 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the items of personal property listed on the attached, which are owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, are no longer useful or necessary to the Village and that the best interests of the Village will be served by selling said personal property at a public auction being the subject of this Ordinance, to the highest bidder. SECTION TWO: The Northwest Municipal Conference shall conduct a public auction on Saturday, October 19, 2002 at 11:00 A.M. at the Mount Prospect Public Works Facility, 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Anyone interested may view the personal property at this location and date between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. SECTION THREE: The Northwest Municipal Conference will cause a public notice informing the general public of this public auction to be published in a newspaper of general circulation. SECTION FOU R: No bid shall be accepted for the sale of any item which is less than the minimum value set forth on the attached list, unless the Village Manager or the designee of the Village Manager so authorizes at the time of the auction. Vehicle auction Page 2/3 SECTION FIVE: Within ten (10) days after the successful bid is accepted, the successful bidder shall tender to the Village of Mount Prospect the consideration specified in the bid accepted and upon receipt of such consideration, the Village Manager is hereby authorized to transfer title of said personal property to the successful bidder. SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Auction Page 3 of 3 Village I.D. ITEMS TO BE PLACED FOR AUCTION OCTOBER 19, 2002 MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Year/Make/Model Type Minimum Price 1-22A P-34A P-33A 312 316 319 32O 301 3O2 2749A 2718A 2734A 4513A 2709A 305A 506A 546 1G1BL5376PW138227 1G1BL52P9SR187754 1G1BL52P8SR186921 1G1BL52P6SR186433 1G1BL52P5SR178548 1GIBL52P9TR145439 1G1BL52P2TR145430 1GIBL52PgTR145540 1G1JC8448P7325562 1GBJV34M5HJ165976 1GBHV34K6FK305508 1GBHV34K2. FK305537 1FDYR8OUXEVA39310 1GCGC24KXME186328 1 GNEG25H5J7164534 1G1BL53EXNW144222 1 FD~E301XGHA52344 GBA60W118F3A AC462006/102232 1993 Chevrolet Caprice 1995 Chevrolet Caprice 1995 Chevrolet Caprice 1995 Chevrolet Caprice 1995 Chevrolet Caprice 1996 Chevrolet Caprice 1996 Chevrolet Caprice 1996 Chevrolet Caprice 1993 Chevrolet Cavalier 1987 Chevrolet ~3500 1989 Chevrolet V3500 1989 Chevrolet V3500 1984 Ford LN8000 1991 Chevrolet C2500 1988 Chevrolet G2500 1992 Chevrolet Caprice 1986 Ford E350 1988 Ford - BSD444T 1982 Lincoln X:\FILES\FRONTOF~ORGANIZE\NWMC~2002 Auction Vehicles.doc Car Car Car Car Car Car Car Car Car Truck Truck Truck Truck Truck Truck Car Truck Engine Welder $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 illage of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES VILLAGE MANAGER SEPTEMBER 11,2002 VILLAGE CODE ARTICLE Il, RULES OF ORDER During an unrelated review of Chapter 2, Board of Trustees, Article II, Rules of Order, it was discovered that a conflict existed between two sections of the Code with regard to where, in the Order of Business, the Consent Agenda item should appear. The proposed Ordinance amending the Code deletes certain language in 2.201.1 which would have the Consent Agenda listed between Old and New Business. Section 2.202 provides the correct Order of Business for Village Board Agendas. Logically, the Consent Agenda should appear prior to Old Business since it is often the case that second readings of non-controversial Ordinances listed under Old Business can be disposed of through the Consent Agenda. Staff considers this to be a minor housekeeping matter. ME J/fcc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II ENTITLED "RULES OF ORDER" OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That paragraph A of Section 2.201.1 entitled "Consent Agenda" of Chapter 2 of the Mount Prospect Village Code, shall be deleted in its entirety, and a new Paragraph A shall be inserted in lieu thereof, so that hereinafter said Section 2.201.1 shall be and read as follows: "2.201.1: CONSENT AGENDA The Village Manager may submit to the President and Board of Trustees, not less than three (3) days prior to the date of the meeting, a consent agenda to be considered by the President and Board of Trustees at said meeting." SECTION 'DNO: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approvaI and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald b Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\GEN~Ies\W[NSO RDINAN C\Ch 2,Rules of Order, Sept 02,doc 2.201,1 2,202 2.201.1: CONSENT AGENDA: The Village Manager may submit to the President and Board of Trustees, not less than three (3) days prior to the date of the meeting, a separate consent agenda to be considered by the President and Board of Trustees immediately after "old business" and before "new business". The consent agenda shall contain all matters deemed by the Village Man- ager to be noncontroversial in nature. The Yillage Manager, in his or her discretion, may include on the consent agenda all matters on, which a prelimi- nary vote or recommendation has been taken by the Village Board, sub- iect to the drafting of an ordinance or resolution. The Manager may also include on the consent agenda resolu- tions, ordinances o? motions, accept- lng plats of subdivision and appoint- ments and reappointments for boards or comm,ssions, togezrmr with all other matters that the Manager deems appropriate for a consent agenda. The consent agenda may be adopted by a roll call vote and the roll call shall be recorded in the minutes of the Village Board as approwng each item contained on the consent agenda. The motion to adopt the consent agenda shall be nondebatable. Any item may be removed from the consent agenda at the Village Board meeting at the request of any one Trustee or Village President, in which case the item shall be considered separateIy. The taking of a single vote on the consent agenda shall be deemed sufficient compliance with al require- ments of iaw, as if the vote had been taken separately by nays and ayes on ' the question of each ordinance, reso- lution and motion included on the' consent agenda. In the event one or more Trustees wishes to be recorded as passing or voting against any item included in the consent agenda, that Trustee Shall so notify the Vii]age Clerk who will make an appropriate reference in the minutes to record such negative votes. (Ord. 5124, 7-18-2OOO) 2:202:.- ORDER OF BUSINESS; REGU- LAR MEETINGS ONLY: Promptly at the hour set by law on the date of each regular meeting, the Village President, Trustees, Village 'Clerk and Village Manager shall take their places in the Board' room of the Mount Prospect Senior Citizen Center, 50 South Emerson Street, unless notice for the meeting specifies anoth- er place. Immediately thereafter the business of 'the Board of Trustees shall be taken up in the order found in the written agenda circulated among the Presi- dent and Board of Trustees prior to the meeting date. The written agenda shall set forth the order of business substantially as follows: 1. Call to order. 2. Roll call. 3. Pledge of Allegiance. · ' 4. Invocation. September 2000 Village of Mount Prospect VWL 9/12/02 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A DETERMINATION OF THE PREVAILING WAGE RATES WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has enacted "An Act regulating wages of laborers, mechanics and other works employed in any public works by the State, County, Village or any other public body or any political subdivision or by an one under contract for public works," approved June 26, 1941, as amended (820 ILCS 130/1); and WHEREAS, the aforesaid Act requires that the Village of Mount Prospect of Cook County investigate and ascertain the prevailing rate of wages as defined in said Act for laborers, mechanics and other workers in the locality of said Village of Mount Prospect employed in performing public works projects for said Village of Mount Prospect. BE lT ORDAINED BYTHE VILLAGE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: To the extent as required by "An Act regulating wages of laborers, mechanics and other workmen employed in any public works by the State, County, City or any public body or any political subdivision or anyone under contract for public works," approved June 26, 1941, as amended, the general prevailing rate of wages in this locality for laborers, mechanics and other workers engaged in the construction of public works coming under the jurisdiction of the Village is hereby ascertained to be the same as the prevailing rate of wages for construction work in the Cook County areas as determined by the Department of Labor of the State of Illinois as of September 1, 2002, a copy of which wage rates are on file in the Office of the Village Clerk. The definition of any terms appearing in this Ordinance which are also used in the aforesaid Act shall be the same as in said Act. SECTION TWO: Nothing herein contained shall be construed to apply said general prevailing rate of wages as herein ascertain to any work or employment except public works construction of this Village to the extent required by aforesaid act. SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk shall publicly post or keep available for inspection by any interested party in the main office of this Village this determination of such prevailing rate of wages. .SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk shall mail a copy of this determination to any employer, and to any association of employees and to any person or association of employees who have filed, or file their names and addresses, requesting copies of any determination stating the particular rates and the particular class of workers whose wages will be affect by such rates. Page 2/2 Prevailing Wage - 2002 SECTION FIVE: The Village Clerk shall promptly file a certified copy of this determination with both the Secretary of State and the Department of Labor of the State of Illinois and shall further cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the Village, a copy of this determination which shall constitute notice that the determination is effective and that this is the determination of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:tGEN\l'les\WlN\ORDINANC\PrevailingWage, 2002.do¢ Cook County Prevailing Wage for September 2002 Page 1 of 5 Cook County Prevailing Wage for September 2002 Trade Name RG TYP C ASBESTOS ABT-GEN ALL ASBESTOS ABT-MEC BLD 23.300 24.800 1.5 BOILERMAKER BLD 33.190 35.030 2.0 BRICK MASON BLD 30.150 32.150 1.5 CARPENTER ALL 31,970 33.470 1.5 CEMENT MASON ALL 32.000 33.000 2.0 CERAMIC TILE FNSHER ALL 23.850 0.000 2.0 COMM. ELECT. BLD 28.500 30.000 1.5 ELECTRIC PWR EQMT OP ALL 32.450 37.800 1.5 ELECTRIC PWR GRNDMAN ALL 25.310 37.800 1.5 ELECTRIC PWR LINEMAN ALL 32.450 37.800 1.5 ELECTRICIAN ALL 32.650 34.650 1.5 ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTOR BLD 33.585 37.780 2.0 FENCE ERECTOR ALL 21.840 23.090 1.5 GLAZIER BLD 27.800 28.800 1.5 HT/FROST INSULATOR BLD 29.800 31.550 1.5 IRON WORKER ALL 32.580 34.080 2.0 LABORER ALL 28,000 28.750 1.5 LATHER BLD 31.970 33.470 1.5 MACHINIST BLD 31.920 33.670 2.0 MARBLE FINISHERS ALL 23.000 0.000 1.5 MARBLE MASON BLD 26.780 28.280 1.5 MILLWRIGHT ALL 31.970 33.470 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 1 33.850 37.850 2.0 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 2 32.550 37.850 2.0 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 3 30.000 37.850 2.0 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 4 28.250 37.850 2.0 OPERATING ENGINEER FLT 1 36.300 36.300 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER FLT 2 34.800 36.300 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER FLT 3 31.000 36.300 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER FLT 4 25.750 36.300 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 1 32.050 36.050 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 2 31.500 36.050 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 3 29.450 36.050 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 4 28.050 36.050 1.5 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 5 26.850 36.050 1.5 ORNAMNTL IRON WORKER ALL 28.850 30.350 2.0 PAINTER ALL 29.850 33.580 1.5 PAINTER SIGNS BLD 25.150 28.240 1.5 PILEDRIVER ALL 31.970 33.470 1.5 PIPEFITTER BLD 33.480 35.480 1.5 PLASTERER BLD 29.090 30.090 1.5 PLUMBER BLD 35.000 37.000 1.5 ROOFER BLD 30,850 32.850 1.5 SHEETMETAL WORKER BLD 30.730 33.190 1.5 SIGN HANGER BLD 21.930 22.780 1.5 SPRINKLER FITTER BLD 32.420 33.920 2.0 STEEL ERECTOR ALL 30.000 31.500 2.0 STONE MASON BLD 30.150 32.150 1.5 TERRAZZO FINISHER BLD 23.240 0.000 1.5 TERRAZZO MASON BLD 27.500 29.000 2.0 TILE MASON BLD 29.130 31.130 2.0 TRAFFIC SAFETY WRKR HWY 19.650 21.150 1.5 TRUCK DRIVER E ALL 1 25.900 26.550 1.5 TRUCK DRIVER E ALL 2 26.150 26.550 1.5 TRUCK DRIVER E ALL 3 26.351 26.550 1.5 TRUCK DRIVER E ALL 4 26.550 26.550 1.5 Base FRMAN *M-F>80SA OSH H/W Pensn Vac 28.000 28.750 1.5 1,5 2.0 3~580 2.970 01000 Trng o~170 1,5 2.0 3,640 5.520 0,000 0.000 2.0 2,0 3,700 4.650 0~000 0,150 1.5 2,0 4,550 5. 080 0,000 0.120 1.5 2.0 4,710 3.510 0,000 0,440 1.5 2,0 4,880 3.750 0,000 0,150 1.5 2,0 4,250 3.700 0,000 0.210 1.5 2.0 3,750 5.080 0,000 0.700 1.5 2.0 4.310 7.640 0,000 0.160 1.5 2,0 3,360 5.960 0,000 0.120 1.5 2.0 4,310 7.640 0,000 0.160 1.5 2.0 6,600 5,830 0,000 0.750 2.0 2.0 4,425 2.610 2.020 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.300 5.120 0.000 0~000 2.0 2.0 4.540 7.800 0.000 0.200 1.5 2.0 5.910 7.560 0.000 0.230 2.0 2.0 6.000 9.660 0,000 0,270 1.5 2.0 3.580 2.970 0,000 0.170 1.5 2.0 4.710 3.510 0.000 0.440 2.0 2.0 3.200 3,100 2.200 0.000 1.5 2.0 3.600 3.800 0.000 0.240 1.5 2.0 4.300 6.600 0.000 0.230 1.5 2.0 4.710 3.510 0.000 0.440 2.0 2.0 5.400 4.250 1.700 0.500 2.0 2.0 5.400 4.250 1.700 0.500 2.0 2.0 5%400 4.250 1.700 0.500 2.0 2.0 5.400 4.250 1.700 0.500 1.5 2.0 5.150 4.000 1.600 0.000 1.5 2.0 5.150 4.000 1.600 0.000 1.5 2.0 5. 150 4.000 1.600 0.000 1.5 2.0 5.150 4.000 1.600 0.000 1.5 2.0 5.400 4.250 1.700 0.500 1.5 2.0 5.400 4.250 1.700 0.500 1.5 2.0 5.400 4.250 1.700 0.500 1.5 2.0 5.400 4.250 1.700 0.500 1.5 2.0 5.400 4.250 1.700 0.500 2.0 2.0 4,300~7.370 0,000 0.000 1.5 1.5 4.300 4.300 0.000 0.340 1.5 1.5 2.600 2.010 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.710 3.510 0.000 0~440 1.5 2.0 4.470 5~100 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.000 5.100 0.000 0.400 1.5 2.0 4.500 2.990 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 3.950 2.380 0.000 0.320 1.5 2.0 4,310 6.790 0.000 0.490 1.5 2.0 3.580 1.740 0.440 0.000 2.0 2.0 4.000 4.900 0.000 0.300 2.0 2.0 5.060 8.740 0.000 0.220 1.5 2.0 4.550 5.080 0.000 0.120 1.5 2~0 4.500 5.630 0.000 0.170 1.5 2.0 4,500 6.350 0.000 0.160 1.5 2.0 4.250 4.450 0,000 0.400 1.5 1.5 2.100 0.900 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.000 3.000 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.000 3.000 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.000 3.000 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4,000 3.000 0.000 0.000 htto://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/CM/ODDMO/COOKxxxx.htm 9/12/2002 Cook County Prevailing Wage for September 2002 Page 2 of 5 TRUCK DRIVER TRUCK DRIVER TRUCK DRIVER TRUCK DRIVER TUCKPOINTER W ALL 1 26.400 26.950 1.5 W ALL 2 26.550 26.950 1.5 W ALL 3 26.750 26.950 1.5 W ALL 4 26.950 26.950 1.5 BLD 29.650 30.650 1.5 1.5 2.0 4.050 2.950 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.050 2.950 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.050 2.950 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 4.050 2.950 0.000 0.000 1.5 2.0 3.660 4.500 0.000 0.260 Legend: M~F>8 (Overtime is required for any hour greater than 8 worked each day, Monday through Friday. OSA (Overtime is required for every hour worked on Saturday) OSH (Overtime is required for every hour worked on Sunday and Holidays) H/W (Health & Welfare Insurance) Pensn (Pension) Vac (vacation) Trns (Training) Explanations COOK COUNTY TRUCK DRIVERS (WEST) - That part of the county West of Barrington Road. The following list is considered as those days for which holiday rates of wages for work performed apply: New Years Day, Memorial/Decoration Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day. Generally, any of these holidays which fall on a Sunday is celebrated on the following Monday. This then makes work performed on that Monday payable at the appropriate overtime rate for holiday pay. Common practice in a given local may alter certain days of celebration such as the day after Thanksgiving for Veterans Day. If in doubt, please check with IDOL. EXPLANATION OF CLASSES ASBESTOS ~ GENERAL - removal of asbestos material from any place in a building, including mechanical systems where those mechanical systems are to be removed. This includes the removal of asbestos materials from ductwork or pipes in a building when the building is to be demolished at"the time or at some close future date. ASBESTOS - MECHA/qICAL - removal of asbestos material from mechanical systems, such as pipes, ducts, and boilers, where the mechanical systems are to remain. COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRICIAN - Installation, operation, inspection, maintenance, repair and service of radio, television, recording, voice sound vision production and reproduction, telephone and telephone interconnect, facsimile, data apparatus, coaxial, fibre optic and wireless equipment, appliances and systems used for the transmission and reception of signals of any nature, business, domestic, commercial, education, entertainment, and residential purposes, including but not limited to, communication and telephone, electronic and sound equipment, fibre optic and data communication systems, and the performance of any task directly related to such installation or service whether at new or existing sites, such tasks to include the placing of wire and cable and electrical power conduit or other raceway work within the equipment room and pulling wire and/or cable through conduit and the installation of any incidental conduit, such that the employees covered hereby can complete any job in full. TRAFFIC SAFETY - work associated with barricades, horses and drums used to reduce lane usage on highway work, the installation and removal of temporary lane markings, and the installation and removal of temporary road signs. h++~,.//, ......... to~ ;1 ,,o/ ....... /;cl~I/(~.a'/(MhI37v[(%/C'(%(31<7¥¥¥¥ htrn 9/12/2002 Cook County Prevailing Wage for September 2002 Page 3 of 5 TRUCK DRIVER - BUILDING, HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION - EAST & WEST Class 1. Two or three Axle Trucks. A-frame Truck when used for transportation purposes; Air Compressors and Welding Machines, including those pulled by cars, pick-up trucks and tractors; Ambulances; Batch Gate Lockers; Batch Hopperman; Car and Truck Washers; Carry-ails; Fork Lifts and Hoisters; Helpers; Mechanics Helpers and Greasers; Oil Distributors 2-man operation; Pavement Breakers; Pole Trailer, up to 40 feet; Power Mower Tractors; Self-propelled Chip Spreader; Skipman; Slurry Trucks, 2-man operation; Slurry Truck Conveyor Operation, 2 or 3 man; TEamsters Unskilled dumpman; and Truck Drivers hauling warning lights, barricades, and portable toilets on the job site. Class 2. Four axle trucks; Dump Crets and Adgetors under 7 yards; Dumpsters, Track Trucks, Euclids, Hug Bottom Dump Turnapulls or Turnatrailers when pulling other than self-loading equipment or similar equipment under 16 cubic yards; Mixer Trucks under 7 yeards; Ready-mix Plant Hopper Operator, and Winch Trucks, 2 Axles. Class 3. Five axle trucks; Dump Crets and Adgetors 7 yards and over; Dumpsters, Track Trucks, Euclids, Hug Bottom Dump Turnatrailers or turnapulls when pulling other than self-loading equipment or similar equipment over 16 cubic yards; Explosives and/or Fission Material Trucks; Mixer Trucks 7 yards or over; Mobile Cranes while in transit; Oil Distributors, 1-man operation; Pole Trailer, over 40 feet; Pole and Expandable Trailers hauling material over 50 feet long; Slurry trucks, 1-man operation; Winch trucks, 3 axles or more; Mechanic--Truck Welder and Truck Painter. Class 4. Six axle trucks; Dual-purpose vehicles, such as mounted crane trucks with hoist and accessories; Foreman; Master Mechanic; Self-loading equipment like P.B. and trucks with scoops on the front. OPERATING ENGINEERS - BUILDING Class 1. Mechanic; Asphalt Plant; Asphalt Spreader; Autograde; Backhoes with Caisson attachment; Batch Plant; Benoto; Boiler and Throttle Valve; Caisson Rigs; Central Redi-Mix Plant; Combination Back Hoe Front End-loader Machine; Compressor and Throttle Valve; Concrete Breaker (Truck Mounted); Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Paver; Concrete Placer; Concrete Placing Boom; Concrete Pump (Truck Mounted); Concrete Tower; Cranes, All; Cranes, Hammerhead; Cranes, (GCI and' similar Type); Creter Crane; Crusher, Stone, etc.; Derricks, All; Derricks, Traveling; Formless Curb and Gutter Machine; Grader, Elevating; Grouting Machines; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloader 2-1/4 yd. and over; Hoists, Elevators, outside type rack and pinion and similar machines; Hoists, one, two and three Drum; Hoists, Two Tugger One Floor; Hydraulic Backhoes; Hydraulic Boom Trucks; Hydro Vac (and similar equipment); Locomotives, All; Motor Patrol; Pile Drivers and Skid Rig; Post Hole Digger; Pre-Stress Machine; Pump Cretes Dual Ram; Pump Cretes; Squeeze Cretes-screw Type Pumps; Raised and Blind Hole Drill; Roto Mill Grinder; Scoops - Tractor Drawn; Slip-form Paver; Straddle Buggies; Tournapull; Tractor with Boom and Side Boom; Trenching Machines. Class 2. Bobcat (over 3/4 cu. yd.); Boilers; Brick Forklift; Broom, All Power Propelled; Bulldozers; Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over); Conveyor, Portable; Forklift Trucks; Greaser Engineer; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloaders under 2-1/4 yd.; Hoists, Automatic; Hoists, inside Freight Elevators; Hoists, Sewer Dragging Machine; Hoists, Tugger Single Drum; Laser Screed; Rock Drill (self-propelled); Rock Drill (truck mounted); Rollers, All; Steam Generators; Tractors, http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/CM/ODDMO/COOKxxxx.htm 9/12/2002 Cook County Prevailing Wage for September 2002 Page 4 of 5 Ail; Tractor Drawn Vibratory Roller; Winch Trucks with "A" Frame. Class 3. Air Compressor; Combination - Small Equipment Operator; Generators; Heaters, Mechanical; Hoists, Inside Elevators - (Rheostat Manual Controlled); Hydraulic Power Units (Pile Driving, Extracting, and Drilling); Pumps, over 3" (1 to 3 not to exceed a total of 300 ft.); Pumps, Well Points; Welding Machines (2 through 5); Winches, 4 small Electric Drill Winches; Bobcat (up to and including 3/4 cu. yd.). Class 4. Bobcats and/or other Skid Steer Loaders; Oilers; and Brick Forklift. OPERATING ENGINEERS - FLOATING Class 1. Craft foreman (Master Mechanic), diver/wet tender, engineer (hydraulic dredge). Class 2. Crane/backhoe operator, mechanic/welder, assistant engineer (hydraulic dredge), leverman (hydraulic dredge), and diver tender. Class 3. Deck equipment operator (machineryman), maintenance of crane (over 50 ton capacity) or backhoe (96,000 pounds or more), tug/launch operator, loader, dozer and like equipment on barge, breakwater wall, slip/dock or scow, deck machinery, etc. Class 4. Deck equipment operator (machineryman/fireman), (4 equipment units or more) and crane maintenance 50 ton capacity and under or backhoe weighing 96,000 pounds or less, assistant tug operator. OPERATING ENGINEERS - HEAVY AiqD HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION Class 1. Craft Foreman; Asphalt Plant; Asphalt Heater and Planer Combination; Asphalt Heater Scarfire; Asphalt Spreader; Autograder/GOMACO or other similar type machines; ABG Paver; Backhoes with Caisson attachment; Ballast Regulator; Belt Loader; Caisson Rigs; Car Dumper; Central Redi-Mix Plant; Combination Backhoe Front Endloader Machine, (1 cu. yd. Backhoe Bucket or over or with attachments); Concrete Breaker (Truck Mounted): Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Paver over 27E cu. ft.; Concrete Placer; Concrete Tube Float; Cranes, all attachments; Cranes, Hammerhead, Linden, Peco & Machines of a like nafure; Crete Crane; Crusher, Stone, etc.; Derricks, All; Derrick Boats; Derricks, Traveling; Dowell machine with Air Compressor; Dredges; Field Mechanic-Welder; Formless Curb and Gutter Machine; Gradall and Machines of a like nature; Grader, Elevating; Grader, Motor Grader, Motor Patrol, Auto Patrol, Form Grader, Pull Grader, Subgrader; Guard Rail Post Driver Mounted; Hoists, One, Two and Three Drum; Hydraulic Backhoes; Backhoes with shear attachments; Mucking Machine; Pile Drivers and Skid Rig; Pre-Stress Machine; Pump Cretes Dual Ram; Rock Drill - Crawler or Skid Rig; Rock Drill - Truck Mounted; Roto Mill Grinder; Slip-Form Paver; Soil Test Drill Rig (Truck Mounted); Straddle Buggies; Hydraulic Telescoping Form (Tunnel); Tractor Drawn Belt Loader (with attached pusher - two engineers); Tractor with Boom; Tractaire with Attachments; Trenching Machine; Truck Mounted Concrete Pump with Boom; Raised or Blind Hole; Drills (Tunnel Shaft); Underground Boring and/or Mining Machines; Wheel Excavator; Widener (APSCO). Class 2. Batch Plant; Bituminous Mixer; Boiler and Throttle Valve; Bulldozers; Car Loader Trailing Conveyors; Combination Backhoe Front Endloader Machine (less than 1 cu. yd. Backhoe Bucket or over or with attachments); Compressor and Throttle Valve; Compressor, Common Receiver (3); Concrete Breaker or Hydro Hammer; Concrete Grinding Machine; Concrete Mixer or Paver 7S Series to and including 27 cu. ft.; Concrete Spreader; Concrete Curing Machine, Burlap Machine, Belting Machine and Sealing Machine; Concrete Wheel Saw; Conveyor httn://www.sta~e.il.us/azencv/idol/CM/ODDMO/COOKxxxx.htm 9/12/2002 Cook CountY Prevailing Wage for September 2002 Page 5 of 5 Muck Cars (Haglund or Similar Type); Drills, Ail; Finishing Machine - Concrete; Greaser Engineer; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloader; Hoist - Sewer Dragging Machine; Hydraulic Boom Trucks (All Attachments); Hydro-Blaster; All Locomotives, Dinky; Pump Cretes; Squeeze Cretes-Screw Type Pumps, Gypsum Bulker and Pump; Roller, Asphalt; Rotory Snow Plows; Rototiller, Seaman, etc., self-propelled; Scoops - Tractor Drawn; Self-Propelled Compactor; Spreader - Chip - Stone, etc.; Scraper; Scraper - Prime Mover in Tandem (Regardless of Size); Tank Car Heater; Tractors, Push, Pulling Sheeps Foot, Disc, Compactor, etc.; Tug Boats. Class 3. Boilers; Brooms, All Power Propelled; Cement Supply Tender; Compressor, Common Receiver (2); Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over); Conveyor, Portable; Farm-Type Tractors Used for Mowing, Seeding, etc.; Fireman on Boilers; Forklift Trucks; Grouting Machine; Hoists, Automatic; Hoists, Ail Elevators; Hoists, Tugger Single Drum; Jeep Diggers; Pipe Jacking Machines; Post-Hole Digger; Power Saw, Concrete Power Driven; Pug Mills; Rollers, other than asphalt; Seed and Straw Blower; Steam Generators; Stump Machine; Winch Trucks with "A" Frame; Work Boats; Tamper - Form-Motor Driven. Class 4. Air Compressor; combination - Small Equipment Operator; Directional Boring Machine; Generators; Heaters, Mechanical; Hydraulic Power Unit (Pile Driving, Extracting, or Drilling); Hydro- Blaster; Light Plants, All (1 through 5); Pumps, over 3" (1 to 3 not to exceed a total of 300 ft.); Pumps, Well Points; Tractaire; Welding Machines (2 through 5); Winches, 4 Small Electric Drill Winches. Class 5. Bobcats (all); Brick FForklift Oilers. Other Classifications of Work: For definitions of classifications not otherwise set out, the Department generally has on file such definitions which are available. If there is no such definition on file, the Bureau of Labor Statistics SIC list will be used. If a task to be performed is not subject to one of the classifications of pay set out, the Department will upon being contacted state which neighboring county has such a classification and provide such rate, such rate being deemed to exist by reference in this document. Further, if no such neighboring county rate applies to the task, the Department shall undertake a special determination, such special determination being then deemed to have existed under this determination. If a project requires these, or any classification not listed, please contact IDOL at 618/993-7271 for wage rates or clarifications. LANDSCAPING Landscaping work falls under the existing classifications for laborer, operating engineer and truck driver. The work performed by landscape plantsman and landscape laborer is covered by the existing classification of laborer. The work performed by landscape operators (regardless of equipment used or its size) is covered by the classifications of operating engineer. The work performed by landscape truck drivers (regardless of size of truck driven) is covered by the classifications of truck driver. http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/CM/ODDMO/COOKxxxx.htm 9/12/2002