HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/26/2012 P&Z Minutes 18-12MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CASE NO. PZ -18 -12
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
PETITIONER:
PUBLICATION DATE:
PIN NUMBER:
REQUEST:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
INTERESTED PARTY:
Hearing Date: July 26, 2012
604 W. Central Road
Ball Park in Mount Prospect — Kenneth Strickland
July 11, 2012
03 -34 -326- 009 -0000
Conditional Use approval for a Sports Training and Teaching
Establishment
Richard Rogers, Chair
William Beattie
Tom Fitzgerald
Leo Floros
Jacqueline Hinaber
Joseph Donnelly
Keith Youngquist
Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner
Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development
Ken Strickland
Chairman Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. Mr. Floros made a motion, seconded by Ms. Hinaber to
approve the minutes of the June 28, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting; the minutes Nvere approved 5-
0. Chairman Rogers introduced Case PZ- 18 -12, 604 W. Central Road at 7:32 p.m. The Subject Case is Village
Board Final.
Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner for PZ -18 -12 Nvas seeking Conditional Use approval to operate a sports training
and teaching establishment at 604 W. Central Road.
Ms. Andrade said the Subject Property is located on the north side of Central Road, and includes a vacant office
and Nvarehouse building Nvith related improvements. The Subject Property includes 11,120 square feet of enclosed
building space, 13,000 square feet of semi - enclosed storage, an outdoor storage area, and surface parking. The
Petitioner proposed to remodel the south 11,120 square foot enclosed building space to operate a sports training
and teaching establishment
Ms. Andrade stated per the Petitioner's floor plan, the Petitioner proposed seven (7) tunnel batting cages, a
physical training area, pro shop, restrooms, and an office.
Ms. Andrade said the sports training and teaching establishment Nvould offer baseball and softball training to
individuals and is anticipated to operate Monday through Saturday from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m., and by appointment on
Sundays. Per the Petitioner there Nvould be no more than N, -enty -four (24) clients and five (5) employees at a
time.
Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -18 -12
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 26, 2012 Page 1 of 3
Ms. Andrade stated based on the anticipated number of clients and staff, the Petitioner Nvould be required to
provide t -enty -seven (27) parking spaces for the sport's training and teaching establishment. There are thirtvT-
eight (38) spaces currently on site, which Nvould exceed the parking requirements. To ensure that parking areas
are available to the general public, the Petitioner Nvould be required to relocate the existing fence located to the
east of the building further north and to restripe the parking lot.
Ms. Andrade said the standards for Conditional Uses are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include specific
findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The summary of these findings include:
• The Conditional Use Nvill not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general Nvelfare;
• The Conditional Use Nvill not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
• And adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on
Village streets are provided.
Ms. Andrade stated the proposed sports training establishment Nvould have minimal impact adjacent properties
and Nvould be similar to existing uses in the area. The proposed facility is located near the Mount Prospect Park
District's Community Center, a few parcels to the Nvest on Central Road.
Ms. Andrade said other departments reviewed the Petitioner's proposal and did not object to the use or find that it
Nvould have an adverse impact on the adjacent tenant or properties. It is important that the enrollment level and/or
staff do not increase to an amount that Nvould exceed the Village's parking requirement.
Ms. Andrade stated Staff found that the request for a Conditional Use to allow a Sports Training and Teaching
establishment met the standards for a Conditional Use and that granting such Conditional Use Nvould be in the
best interest of the Village. Based on this analysis, Staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission
approve the motion listed in the Staff Report.
Mr. Beattie asked if the remaining structures to the north of the proposed facility Nvould remain. Ms. Andrade
stated that the Subject Property Nvould stay the same. The area to the north is presently being utilized by the
adjacent tenant located to the west. Chairman Rogers asked if the adjacent tenant Nvas using the parking as Nvell.
Ms. Andrade said that they Nvere only using the outside storage on the Subject Property. Chairman Rogers
confirmed that the remaining eleven (11) parking spaces presentIv on the other side of the fence could be utilized
by the Petitioner or the adjacent neighbor.
Mr. Floros asked if the proposal Nvas similar to the Sports Training and Teaching Establishment zoning case that
the Planning & Zoning Commission heard on June 26, 2012. Ms. Andrade confirmed that the Subject Case is the
same type of use, but different tenant and location.
Chairman Rogers swore in the Petitioner, Ken Strickland, 2018 E. Fremont Court, Arlington Heights, Illinois.
Mr. Strickland discussed the demand for his type of business. He stated that many teams travel to neighboring
communities for sports training and he Nvas looking at bringing this type of facility back to Mount Prospect.
Chairman Rogers asked if the restrooms Nvould be changed. Mr. Strickland stated the restrooms Nvould be
renovated so that they could be ADA compliant. He said he is currently Nvorking Nvith an architect and the
landlord; plans Nvould be submitted for permit upon approval of the Conditional Use.
Chairman Rogers asked the Petitioner if there Nvere any issues to the conditions placed by Staff regarding the
number of students and staff. Mr. Strickland stated based on the size of the proposed facility, the numbers Nvould
not be an issue. He said most of the students Nvould be picked up and dropped off, so parking Nvould not be a
Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -18 -12
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 26, 2012 Page 2 of 3
problem at the Subject Property. Mr. Strickland said the oN -,ners of the property agreed to move the fence on the
property back to open up the additional parking.
Mr. Fitzgerald asked when the fence is moved, Nvould it be a gate or an enclosed fence. He Nvas concerned Nvith
heavy equipment coming in and out of the yard while kids Nvere being dropped off and Nvalking through the
parking lot of the Subject Property. Mr. Strickland stated that the fence is a sliding gate and the adjacent
neighbor, L.J. Keefe Co. uses the yard as storage. He did not believe there Nvas heavy activity Nvith moving items
out of the yard. Mr. Beattie asked what Nvas stored in the yard. Mr. Strickland said the neighbor stores
machinery, a large generator, and other items for job sites.
Chairman Rogers asked if there Nvas anyone else in the audience to address this case. Hearing none, he closed the
public portion of the case at 7:41 p.m. and brought the discussion back to the board.
Mr. Beattie made a motion, seconded by Ms. Hinaber to adopt staff findings in the Staff Report as the
findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of a Conditional Use for a
sports training and teaching establishment at 604 W. Central Road, subject to the conditions listed in the
Staff Report.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Fitzgerald, Floros, Hinaber, Rogers
NAYS: None
The motion was approved 5 -0. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
After hearing t�vo (2) additional cases, Mr. Floros made a motion, seconded by Ms. Hinaber to adjourn at 9:08
p.m. The motion Nvas approved by a voice vote and the meeting Nvas adjourned.
Rvan Kast, Community Development
Administrative Assistant
Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -18 -12
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 26, 2012 Page 3 of 3