HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/26/2012 FC MinutesFINANCE COMMISSION
Minutes of the Meeting
July 26, 2012
I" Floor Community Center
Village Hall
L Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:20 p.m. Those present included Chairman Vince
Grochocinski and Commissioners, Pam Bazan, Tom Pekras and Ann Smilanic.
Commissioners Wayne Gardner, John Kellerhals, and Don Ocwieja were absent. Also
present was Finance Director David Erb.
II. Approval of Minutes
May 23, 2012 - Minutes of the meeting were reviewed. Commissioner Pekras motioned
to approve the minutes. Commissioner Bazan seconded the motion and the minutes were
approved.
July 23, 2012 - Minutes of the meeting were reviewed and amended to include the results
of the vote taken at the meeting. Commissioner Bazan motioned to approve the minutes.
Commissioner Pekras seconded the motion and the minutes were approved as amended.
III. Citizens to be Heard
There were no citizens to be heard.
IV. Old Business
Capital Projects Funding Alternatives - Building on the discussions during prior
meetings, where all members of the commission were present, Financial Director Erb
presented a summary of these discussions and the general agreements of the commission
members in order to facilitate continued discussions.
The funding discussions considered the following
1. Street improvement projects
2. Flood control projects
3. Emerald Ash Bore (EAB)
4. Automated meter reading
5. Randhurst incentive funding
The principles governing the Commission's search for funding sources were
1. Funding sources should reflect direct association with use of the funds as far as
possible.
2. Sources of funds should distinguish between on -going needs as distinct from
periodic needs, i.e., street resurfacing is on -going each year while flood control
activities are periodic projects.
3. Incurring debt should be used sparingly to protect the Village credit rating.
4. Sales taxes should not be increased.
Earlier discussions by the Commission recognized the following
1. Randhurst incentive funding requires issuing targeted debt with specifics
understood following ideas expressed when negotiating the original
agreements.
2. The EAB cost for removal and replacement of Village trees should be funded
from current sources, some grant assistance and homeowner participation in
replacing their parkway trees.
3. Automated water meter reading costs should be included in the calculation of
water usage rates as has already begun.
It was agreed that the on -going street improvement needs should take priority
over the flood control issues, but not to the complete exclusion of certain of the
anticipated flood prevention projects.
The Commission considered circumstances regarding the street improvement needs etc.
1. The 10 miles of backlogged street resurfacing would cost in excess of $5
million if it were to be resolved in a single project, and as long as the
backlogged inventory is rotated to prevent the roads going into reconstruction
mode, there is no pressing need to have such a catch up project.
2. The funding needs are continual and must prevent the backlog from growing to
the extent that reconstruction is then needed.
3. The practice of using funds intended for resurfacing to handle other road
related projects while using only left over funds for resurfacing to the extent
available should be discouraged.
4. Combining for display purposes only the Street Improvement Constriction
Fund (SICF) and the Motor Fuel Tax Fund (MFTF), since both are used to
resurface roads, the additional funds needed are estimated at $1.5 million per
year.
5. The current funding sources for the SICF and MFTF are: State allocation of
motor fuel taxes; home rile tax of $.02 cents per gallon; and '/4 cent of the
home rile sales tax.
6. The Commission agreed upon the following funding sources and amounts:
a. Add $.03 cents to the local motor fuel tax (from $0.02 to $0.05). Yields
$510,000
b. Increase the basic vehicle sticker $14 from $36 to $50. Yields $540,000.
c. Divert the surplus from the '/4 cent home rile sales tax now funding the
flood control projects and debt payments to the SICF. Yields start at
$250,000 the first year and increases to $1.4 million per year over several
years. On -going flood projects would still be funded from this sales tax
while project type sewer work is fund by issuing debt.
The flood control study was reviewed it was decided to fund the $14.4
million in public improvements via the issuance of debt. Note that the one
major project already in the Capital Improvement Plan is duplicated in the
$14.4 million and is thus eliminated from the need to use the home rile
sales tax to handle the funding.
2
The debt issued for the flood projects should be repaid via the use of two
special service areas which will either include or exclude the area not
served by Village water and sanitary sewers. The impact on real estate
taxes will be minimize by the fact that Special Service Area 5 debt is
expiring soon and will be replaced by the new debt being recommended.
Private improvements such as overhead sewers, backup prevention devices,
disconnection of foundation drains etc. would not include any public
subsidies. Instead, a funding source would be created by increasing the
monthly Sewer Constriction fee from $5 to $7 per month. Funds generated
from this additional tax total $320,000 per year which would be used to
fund low interest loans to residents who certify that they have had water in
their home subsequent to and including the date of last year's flooding.
The resident would pay 1/3 of the cost up front and the Village would loan
the other 2/3 with the loan to be repaid no later than the sale of the home.
Home owners would be urged to take self serving actions such as stand
pipes, backup battery powered sump pumps, wall crack sealing and flood
and water backup insurance which are not included in this loan program.
The Village should prepare pamphlets on this subject and have a list of
licensed contractors available.
Commission Pekras made a motion to make the above recommendations to
the Village Board of Trustees. Commissioner Bazan seconded the motion
and the motion passed unanimously. Note that Commissioners not present
at this meeting where in general agreement with these conclusion as
expressed in prior meetings. Commissioner Kellerhals did not favor the
increase to the cost of the vehicle sticker. He did though recommend a
$0.05 cent increase to the Village gasoline tax.
V. New Business
Mid -year Budget Review - Finance Director Dave Erb presented the results of the
comparison of six months of actual receipts and disbursements for 2012 to the budget
and the impacts on the full year results and the forecast budget for 2013. Overall,
revenues are projected to come in over budget by $404,000 while expenditures increased
slightly by $186,914. If the projections hold through the end of the year the surplus of
$122,342 will go towards maintaining the General Fund fund balance.
Annual Audit 2010 Review - Finance Director Dave Erb presented the results of the
2010 audit and related auditor comments and management letters. No concerns of great
magnitude were noted. The auditor gave the village audit a clean opinion for its
financials as of December 31, 2011.
VI. Other Business
There was no other business.
VII. Chairman's Report
There was nothing to report.
3
VIII. Finance Director's Report
There was nothing to report.
IX. Next Meeting: Au ist 23, 2012
Commissioner Pekras motioned to give the Chairman authorization to cancel this meeting
depending on the business to be discussed. Commissioner Bazan seconded the motion
and the motion carried.
X. Adjournment
Commissioner Smilanic motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Tom Pekras seconded the
motion which passed. The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Vince Grochocinski