Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. Old Business 03/06/2012Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JANUARY 27, 2012 SUBJECT: PZ -32 -11 / 1108 N. ELMHURST ROAD 1 VARIATIONS (FLOOR AREA & LOT COVERAGE) / LINDA L. DAVIS — PETITIONER The Petitioner is seeking approval of variations to the floor area and lot coverage for a building addition at 1108 N. Elmhurst Road. The Petitioner removed a portion of the wood deck that is located in the rear yard and started construction of a two -story building addition without a permit. As a result, Village Staff issued a Stop Work Order in November of 2011. The Petitioner applied for a building permit subsequently, but was denied by the Planning Division as the Subject Property exceeds the maximum floor.area and lot coverage permitted. The Petitioner now seeks Variations to increase the floor area and overall lot coverage to allow the building addition to remain and be completed. A maximum of 7,000 square feet (20,000 x 0.35 = 7,000) is allowed for floor area and lot coverage at the Subject Property. The petitioner provided information which indicates the property has a floor area of 7,088.63 square feet and 11,600.63 of lot coverage. Therefore, the subject property exceeds the maximum floor area permitted by 88.63 square feet (7,088.63 — 7,000 = 88.63) and the maximum lot coverage permitted by 4,600.63 square feet (11,600.63 -7,000 = 4,600.63). The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the requests on Thursday, January 26, 2012, and by a vote of 6 -0 recommended denial of the requests for 1) a Variation to increase the floor area from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 7,088.63 square feet (35.44 %) and 2) a Variation to increase the overall lot coverage from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 11,600.63 square feet (58.02 %) for the residence located at 1108 N. Elmhurst Road. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their February 7, 2012 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. Cooney, Jr., Al HRLANTI.. d & Zo—g COMMT&Z 2111 1W Mcmo W,37-11 1108 N. E[mLutsl Rd (Vanadaus).do MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -32 -11 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUESTS: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTY: Hearing Date: January 26, 2012 1108 N. Elmhurst Road Linda Davis January 11, 2012 03- 27- 305 -014 -0000 1) Variation to Increase Floor Area 2) Variation to Increase Overall Lot Coverage Richard Rogers, Chair William Beattie Joseph Donnelly Keith Youngquist Leo FIoros Jacqueline Hinaber, Alternate None Consuelo Andrade, Development Review Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development Linda Davis Chairman Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Youngquist to approve the minutes of the December 8, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting; the minutes were approved 4 -0 with Mr. Floros abstaining. Mr. Beattie arrived at 7:39 p.m. After hearing one (1) previous case, Chairman Rogers introduced Case PZ- 32 -11, 1108 N. Elmhurst Road at 7:39 p.m. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner for PZ -32 -11 requested Variations to increase the permitted floor area and lot coverage for the property located at 1108 N. Elmhurst Road. Ms. Andrade stated the Subject Property is located on the west side of Elmhurst Road and currently contains a single - family residence with related improvements. Upon receiving a complaint, Village Staff conducted an inspection of the Subject Property in November 2011 and found that a two (2) story building addition was being constructed without a building permit. Consequently, Village Staff posted a Stop Work Order on the Subject Property. The Petitioner subsequently applied for a building permit, but was denied by the Planning Division as the Subject Property exceeded the maximum floor area and lot coverage permitted. The Petitioner was seeking a Variation to increase the floor area and overall lot coverage to allow the building addition to remain and be completed. Ms. Andrade said the two (2) story building addition measures approximately eighteen (18) feet wide by twenty (20) feet deep. Per the Petitioner's floor plans, the addition would consist of a bedroom on the first floor and a loft on the second floor. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -32 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 26, 2012 Page 1 of 4 Ms. Andrade showed pictures that were taken during inspections that indicated the building addition's wood framing and vinyl siding finish. Upon completion, the building addition would measure approximately twenty - two (22) feet in height. Ms. Andrade referenced the following table: Setbacks: R.X District Minimum Requirements W/O Building Addition W/ Building Addition Front Min. 40' 49.58' No change Interior Side Yard .) Min. 10' 8.50'(non- conformin No change Interior Side Yard (S. ) Min. 10' 18.17' No change Rear Min. 30' 54.76' 50.74' Building Height Max. 35' 21' -8" No change Floor Area Max. 7,000 sq.ft. .35 6,463.63 sq.ft. .32 7,088.63 sq. , (.3544 Lot Coverage Max. 7,000 sq.ft. (35 %) 11,240.63 sq.ft. (56 %) non - conformin ) 11,600.63 sgft. (58.02%) Ms. Andrade stated the table compared the Petitioner's proposal to the RX District's bulk requirements. The Subject Property consists of nonconformities that include the principal structure, floor area, and lot coverage. The principal structure is setback eight and one half (8.5) feet from the north property line when the Village Code requires a minimum of ten (10) feet. With the two (2) story building addition, the floor area increased from 6,463 square feet to 7,088 square feet, which exceeds the maximum 7, 000 square feet floor area permitted. In regards to overall lot coverage, it currently measures fifty -eight (58) percent, when the maximum permitted is thirty-five (35) percent. The Petitioner was seeking Variations to allow increases to floor area and lot coverage. Ms. Andrade said the standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven (7) specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following is a summary of these findings: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner mentioned that the replacement of the wood deck area with the building addition did not affect the lot coverage. While the petitioner stated that the lot coverage did not change, the lot existing coverage was non - conforming and the Village Code requires the new structure to comply with Code requirements. The Petitioner also stated that the building addition is for a family member in declining health. Staff understood the Petitioner's personal needs for the addition; however, it does not constitute a hardship. The alleged hardships presented in this case have therefore been created directly by the property owner's own interest in the property and not by the zoning code. There are no unique conditions on the property which would not exist elsewhere within the Village. Ms. Andrade said Staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the motions listed in the Staff Report. Chairman Rogers confirmed with Staff that the work was started without permit, and then stopped, and then the Petitioner applied for the permit. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -32 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 26, 2012 Page 2 of 4 Chairman Rogers swore in the property owner, Linda Davis, 1108 N. Elmhurst Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Davis stated that her request was to build an addition to her home for an immediate family member who is in declining health. She said the request for the room addition would be built on an existing deck. Ms. Davis discussed that she was given a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) in 2004 with the deck already in place. She did not believe by replacing the deck with the room addition would affect the impervious surface on the Subject Property, Ms. Davis said her husband is the General Contractor on the proposed project. She stated that they knew they needed permits for the project, but they were trying to accommodate her mother. Ms. Davis discussed that the proposed addition would be private living space for her mother. Chairman Rogers confirmed that there are four (4) existing bedrooms at the Subject Property. Ms. Davis said there are three (3) bedrooms on the first floor and one (1) bedroom on the second floor. She stated that her mother could not utilize the second floor bedroom. The proposed living space would be close to a first floor bedroom. Ms. Davis said the other bedrooms are occupied by her and her husband and her daughters. There was additional discussion on the work being conducted without permit. Mr. Donnelly asked if the Petitioner looked into other ways of reducing the impervious surface so the room addition would comply. Ms. Davis said she would need to talk with her husband, but asked if she were to reduce some of the impervious surface would she still be allowed to build the addition. Mr. Donnelly asked Staff if the amount of impervious surface on the Subject ,Property was grandfathered in or was the Subject Property always a part of the Village. Mr. Simmons said when the Subject Property was originally developed and issued permits in the 1980's there was no lot coverage requirement. The lot coverage requirement was not in effect until the early 1990's. There were floor area ratio requirements at the time the original permit was issued. Mr. Simmons stated that there are non - conforming provisions in the Code that allow existing conditions on properties that do not meet current Code to be grandfathered in. However the Petitioner is modifying the property and would need to conform to the current Code. There was additional discussion regarding bringing the Subject Property's lot coverage into compliance with the Code. The consensus among the Commissions was that the property would have to be brought down significantly from 11,000 square feet to 7,000 square feet in order to comply with Code. Mr. Youngquist said that with the way the Code has been written, there was no way the addition could be allowed. Ms. Davis asked if the property was no longer grandfathered in on lot coverage because the deck was removed. Mr. Simmons stated that was correct. He said the non - conforming provisions are what were grandfathered in. As soon as any part of the structure is removed with current zoning, the "grandfather clause" from the non- conforming code section is lost. Mr. Youngquist discussed with the addition that the Petitioner is also over on the floor area ratio (FAR). There. was discussion on having the Petitioner remove the second floor of the proposed addition; however the lot coverage would still be over what the current Code allows. There was additional discussion regarding the Petitioner's living situation in relation to what the proposed addition would provide. Chairman Rogers asked if the Petitioner investigated purchasing the Iot to the south that was in foreclosure. Ms. Davis stated that she has looked into purchasing the property in question, but the bank and attorneys for the property to the south would not speak to her. She said the home to the north is in disarray and was not interested in purchasing the property. Chairman Rogers asked if the Petitioner could purchase the land to the north, demolish the existing home and make the Subject Property and the property to the north one (1) lot of record. Ms. Davis stated that this would be really costly for her. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -32 -1 l Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 26, 2012 Page 3 of 4 Chairman Rogers asked if there was anyone else in the audience to address this case. Hearing none, he closed the public portion of the case at 8:00 p.m. and brought the discussion back to the board. Ms. Hinaber. made a motion, seconded by Mr. Donnelly to approve a Variation to in the floor area from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to. 7,088.63 square feet (35.44 %); and a Variation to increase the overall lot coverage from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 11,600.63 square feet (58.02 %) for the residence located at 1108 N. Elmhurst Road, Case No. PZ- 32 -11. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: None NAYS: Beattie, Donnelly, Floros, Hinaber, Youngquist, Rogers The motions were denied 6 -0. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. After hearing one (1) additional case, Chairman Rogers asked if there were any citizens in the audience waiting to be heard. Hearing none, Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Ms. Hinaber to adjourn at 9:21 p.m. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Ryan Kast, Community Development Administrative Assistant Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -32 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 26, 2012 Page 4 of 4 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY -- PZ- 32 -11- LOCATION: 1108 N. Elmhurst Road PETITIONER: Linda Davis OWNER: Same as Petitioner PARCEL #: 03 -27- 305 -014 -0000 LOT SIZE: 0.46 acres (20,000 square feet) ZONING: RX — Single Family Residence LAND USE: Single Family Residential REQUEST: 1) Variation to Increase Floor Area 2) Variation to Increase the Overall Lot Coverage . r� LOCATION MAP Village ®f Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER JANUARY 9, 2012 JANUARY 26, 2012 T Nloom Ptospea PZ -32 -1 11 1 108 N. ELMHURST RD. / VARIATION TO F.A.R. & LOT COVERAGE / LINDA DAVIS A public hearing has been scheduled for the January 26, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Linda Davis (the "Petitioner "), regarding the property located at 1108 N. Elmhurst (the "Subject Property "). The Petitioner is seeking Variations to increase the permitted floor area and lot coverage. The P &Z Commission hearing was properly noticed in the January 11, 2012 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and posted Public Hearing signs on the Subject Property, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the west side of Elmhurst Road and currently contains a single- family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RX Single: Family Residence and is bordered by the RX District on the north, west, and south sides. The Subject Property borders the B3 Community Shopping PUD district (Randhurst Village) on the east side. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner removed a portion of the wood deck that is located in the rear yard and started construction of a two -story building addition without a permit. As a result, Village Staff issued a Stop Work Order in November of 2011. Subsequently, the Petitioner applied for a building permit, but was denied by the Planning Division as the Subject Property exceeds the maximum floor area and lot coverage permitted. The Petitioner now seeks a Variation to increase the floor area and overall lot coverage to allow the building addition to remain and be completed. The two -story building addition measures approximately eighteen (18) feet wide by twenty (20) feet deep (360 sq.ft.). Per the attached floor plans, the addition would consist of a bedroom on the first floor and a loft on the second floor. The elevations indicate the addition would be constructed out of vinyl siding and measure approximately twenty two (22) feet in height to the midpoint of the roof. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The Subject Property does not comply with the Village's zoning regulations. The following nonconformities exist on the property: PZ -32 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 26, 2012 Page 3 • The principal structure is setback eight and one half (8.5) feet from the north property line. Village Code requires a minimum of ten (10) feet. • The detached garage encroaches into an existing ten (10) foot easement. Village Code prohibits any building, structure, or other obstruction to be constructed within any easement. • The driveway width measures approximately seventy three and one half (73.5) feet when the maximum permitted is fifty four (54) feet, as approved by a Variation (Ord. No. 3550) granted in 1985. • The floor area ratio exceeds the maximum permitted in the RX District. The floor area is 7,088.63 square feet (.3544 of lot area) when the maximum permitted is 7,000 square feet (.35 of lot area). • The lot coverage exceeds the maximum permitted in the RX district. As per the attached Plat of Survey, the overall lot coverage is 11,600.63 square feet (58.02 %) when the maximum allowed is 7,000 square feet (35 %). No Variations were approved for the non - conforming items listed above. The following table compares the RX District's bulk requirements with the Subject Property: When the petitioner applied for the two -story building addition in December 2011, the PIanning Division denied the permit as the property exceeds the maximum permitted floor area and lot coverage. Per the Village Code, the maximum permitted floor area and lot coverage are both 7,000 square feet (20,000 x 0.35 = 7,000). The petitioner provided information which indicates the property has a floor area of 7,088.63 square feet (3544 of lot area) and 11,600.63 of lot coverage. Therefore, the subject property exceeds the maximum floor area permitted by 88.63 square feet (7,088.63 T 7,000 = 88.63) and the maximum lot coverage permitted by 4,600.63 square feet (11,600.63 - 7,000). It should be noted the floor area calculation method has changed since the property received a variation in 1988 and now includes accessory structures in its calculations. The Village did not have any lot coverage requirements when the home was originally permitted. Nonconforming Structures Per Section 14.402 of the Zoning Code, the replacement of any structure on the property requires the new structure to meet bulk regulations for the zoning district. In this case, the replacement of the deck with -the building addition is not permitted as the overall lot coverage is non - conforming and the floor area exceeds the maximum permitted. Without the building addition, the floor area would be 6,463.63 square feet (.32), which would meet Code. Furthermore, without the building addition or the original deck area the overall lot coverage would be reduced to 11,600.63 square feet (56.20 %), which would still exceed Code, but reduces the overall nonconformity. Staff reviewed the permit history for the Subject Property to determine when the wood deck was constructed and found no record of a deck permit. RX District Minimum Requirements W/O Building Addition W/ Building Addition Setbacks: Front Min. 40' 49.58' No than e Interior Side Yard Min. 10' 8.50' (non-conformin No change Interior Side Yard (S.) Min. 10' 18.17' No change Rear Min. 30' 54.76' 50.74' Building Height Max. 35' 21'4" No change Floor Area Max. 7,000 s .ft. .35 6,463.63 s .ft. .32 7,088.63 s . t. (.3544 Lot Coverage Max. 7,000 sq.ft. (35 %) 11,240.63 sq.ft. (56 %) non- conformin 11,600.63 sgft. (58.02 %) When the petitioner applied for the two -story building addition in December 2011, the PIanning Division denied the permit as the property exceeds the maximum permitted floor area and lot coverage. Per the Village Code, the maximum permitted floor area and lot coverage are both 7,000 square feet (20,000 x 0.35 = 7,000). The petitioner provided information which indicates the property has a floor area of 7,088.63 square feet (3544 of lot area) and 11,600.63 of lot coverage. Therefore, the subject property exceeds the maximum floor area permitted by 88.63 square feet (7,088.63 T 7,000 = 88.63) and the maximum lot coverage permitted by 4,600.63 square feet (11,600.63 - 7,000). It should be noted the floor area calculation method has changed since the property received a variation in 1988 and now includes accessory structures in its calculations. The Village did not have any lot coverage requirements when the home was originally permitted. Nonconforming Structures Per Section 14.402 of the Zoning Code, the replacement of any structure on the property requires the new structure to meet bulk regulations for the zoning district. In this case, the replacement of the deck with -the building addition is not permitted as the overall lot coverage is non - conforming and the floor area exceeds the maximum permitted. Without the building addition, the floor area would be 6,463.63 square feet (.32), which would meet Code. Furthermore, without the building addition or the original deck area the overall lot coverage would be reduced to 11,600.63 square feet (56.20 %), which would still exceed Code, but reduces the overall nonconformity. Staff reviewed the permit history for the Subject Property to determine when the wood deck was constructed and found no record of a deck permit. PZ -32 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 26, 2012 Page 4 VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner states that the replacement of the wood deck area with the building addition did not affect the lot coverage. While the petitioner states that the lot coverage did not change, the lot coverage was non - conforming and the Village Code requires the new structure to comply with Code requirements. The Petitioner also states that the building addition is for a family member in declining health. While Staff understands the Petitioner's personal needs for the addition, it does not constitute a hardship. The alleged hardships presented in this case have therefore been created directly by the property owner's own interest in the property and not by the zoning code. There are no unique conditions on the property which would not exist elsewhere within the Village. RECOMMENDATION The Variation requests for a 7,088.63 sq.ft. floor area (35.44 %) and 11,600.63 sq. ft lot coverage (58.02 %) lot coverage do not meet the standards for Variations contained in Section 12.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance for the reasons previously noted. Based on this analysis, Staff recommends that the P &Z deny the following motions: "To approve 1. A Variation to increase the floor area from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 7,088.63 square feet (35.44°/x), as shown in the floor plans prepared by Koziol and Brown Architects and Engineers dated December 12, 2011; and 2. A Variation to increase the overall lot coverage from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 11,600.63 square feet (58.02 %), as shown in the Plat of Survey dated December 7, 2011 for the residence located at 1108 N. Elmhurst Road, Case No. PZ -32 -1 U' This case is Village Board final since the lot coverage Variation exceeds 25% of the Zoning Ordinance requirement. I concur: William J. ooney, AIC Director of Community Development A H:IP[.AMFlatudng & Zoning C0MMT&Z 2ol l%Staff RWrtt%P2 i2 -1 l IM N. Elmhurst Rd. (VAR -F.A & Lot Cowrap).d= v L VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT �� x�ntl'ras�ecx COMMUNH. Y DLVI:I.OPMI NI llI'-PAR'1'Mi NT- - Planning Division 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5 329 Zoning Re ,Application y Casa Number -- - — --~ _- — - -- c— PKZ --- �, Devolopment NamcYAddress M � C Date orSttbslUSSion Y. v IIcaring Date Y. ZONING Rl3QIJIiST (s): ❑ Conclitional l.Jsc for —. .— ❑ Zoning Map Amendment: From ._- - - - to — �€ Variatiost Imill Scc._114,305 : GUI* L cnq ? - 1 - cxl. Anlcndinew: Sections) -- L*C'; LOT CwcVV t (011 - sce only ) El' I � 0111" villa�- Board i'istai C d _ _ SlJV1MAlt'k'Y ()I' RF;QIJESTF,D; C" ON: _.�ti.Qf�-- t3C.¢izf?.9Y i S._►n_?�ta'r. LgcAT�cAn•- -- -- --- -- __ - - - -- -- - .06-0P br CZ_ - LET__CSV + L .r._�4i- -_5 �`ya \Mount Prospect Department ofCommunily Development rnonc Olt 1.0 1 a.),co 50 South Emerson Street, \Mount Prospect 1lliiloiS Fax 847.818 -5329 .�rv�t.monnfiprospcct.org 1 TDD 847.392.6064 -- Pro ert" Owner Sallie as applica l Name l elep lione (day) 07- Total Build Sq. I't, Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed /... C c 9t ®�taoe� (-� -�C 3� t + :G erne E -' C5 Cor orali p Telephone (cvcnin) U O o Fax - Street Address ce z c. F i city State Zip Code Email Mount Prospect Department 'O Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 SOU111 rnwrspai Slrcet, lutOcnil Prospect Illinois Pax 847.818:5329 www.inola III Pros pect,org 2 TDD 847.392.6064 Address(es) (.Street Number, Street) Lot Area (Sell']) 7oninu District Total Build Sq. I't, Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use Mee the Standards for the Zoning 9t ®�taoe� (-� -�C 3� t + :G erne E U11 5etliacks: Front hear Side (P4 Side F Ss. -f e' la.sv 1 - 1 1 r Building Height Lot Coverage (%,) Standard. Parking Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces S8 �oL N fl ]-lours of Operation q� , Adjacent hand Uses: 3orth V,-Y, :Souris R: x ��ISt r�•-3 - west R Y, w E ekes RES�PPnZ'r�]Z- �(SyNtY��UR�TY S7k�t'Q1r�ft ��tSi N icdaL.. Property Index Number(s): a . j .._'�_." d_ Q r En (attach a dd itional sheets if ncee:ssaljr) - — - - -- - W w Legal Mscription (attach additional sheets if necessary) -r ea_JC;F s:�c�atvcstar►_� RAV- or _ .fv,9S7. RL G tr�n na4. ii. FAST nFTa-1jC Tric¢,1] cr1G� � CYt�e�� Arr1.2�i � �G �H� 4t..f#'T` TNFt�fu�C> =- 2.rccnrcr�,u� cYtr}ec� ±- i,r�9!�f� gs��LA k ].EA=_.tl> )oaA uL i _i1n f�� COL 1 I LLLI G. Mount Prospect Department 'O Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 SOU111 rnwrspai Slrcet, lutOcnil Prospect Illinois Pax 847.818:5329 www.inola III Pros pect,org 2 TDD 847.392.6064 Proposed Use (as listed 'ill the zon diwict) Dpsc,l'tbc -in Detail. ti le Rnd Activities Pro.p b9cd and 1'lnw the Prop osed Use Mee the Standards for the Zoning Request..A.pproval (attach additional sheets If netessary) ]xC C Fi `rt 0 Q N 6 �fl -Q(�� i [!t]— rrttr..._z�t�nt���t�. Lo >✓ C�r1�¢R�rF QR�� n rte,,._ Cy ; •_ An t .r.! �CISTrJ4 t CCU,w� RCK,�?. fn ]-lours of Operation q� , Mount Prospect Department 'O Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 SOU111 rnwrspai Slrcet, lutOcnil Prospect Illinois Pax 847.818:5329 www.inola III Pros pect,org 2 TDD 847.392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 547.81$•5328 56 South ]Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois l °a 547.81.8.5329 www.mountprospect.org 3 T] N) .84 7.3916064 Address(es) (SIrcei Number, Street) ELM sr p 1,61 Area (Sq,l Zaning Eaisnict Total Building Sq, Ft. Sq. Ft. Devoted' to Proposed } qa� Use 5 Setbacks: - -- C) O FTOnt Bear _..__... Side OUS - SidCns t= % . d �giJ CE' J�d•'ls' // __---- $"50 t i z L ` }� eg �X3ST[ IJt, C Buildin H eig ht E �D l C[lV[:i'a �C °fin ( ) Standard Parking Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces n � 515 ��0�. Iv Ov Oevelolicr Name ��► Telephone (day) Address Fax ) c Attorney Name Telephone (da w Address Fax lniail c � U [` Snkveyor Q Nainc f Lca� �-ta.t���� ri CA. Telephone {day) � 4 6a5P E3s37 m Address ;— Email uco 6mR tit, cam }n�iitcc� Name Telephone (day) Address �_ ___... _ -._ -- Fax — --- Email Fl rcliiteCt - - - Nance Telephone (flay) _ &3); LjS5 Address I6 a1 Oj� Fax: -- Email ,iuE•- c•. VM Lm dscape Arch:ilect - -- Name X11 Ps T lephone (clay) Address . __ _ . _ ...... __ Fax -- Email Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 547.81$•5328 56 South ]Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois l °a 547.81.8.5329 www.mountprospect.org 3 T] N) .84 7.3916064 Pleasc note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfaclorily submitted to the Cr MMUnity Development Departim m's Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not he acce pted, It i strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appoinlrllent With the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewod for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information corntaincd in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is rcqucstcd that approval be givell to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner or the property grant employees of the Village of Mount prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Applicant ' �� bate (signature Print Nanlc I f applicani is. not property .owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this 'application and tile.:associatcd supporting material - Property (owner _ Date (51 gna, lire) Prilli Nome Mount prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South t luerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois rax 847.818:.5329 mm.rilountplos.pect.org 4 TDD 847.392.6064 KOZIOL ENGINEERING SVCS., LTD, Professional Engineers 1621 Ogden Ave, Lisle IL 60532 630 - 435 -8686 FAX 630 -435 -8689 December 12, 2011 Village of Mount Prospect Building Division 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Su�b'_eat 1108 N. Elmhurst Road Calculations for subject property: Floor Area Ratio: 7,088 SF (floor area) / 20,000 SF (lot area) = 35.44% - Variance required since > 35% Lot Coverage Ratio: Existing: 11,600 SF (building, deck, conc. drive, brick pavers) / 20,000 SF (lot area) = 58.02% Proposed: 11,600 SF (building, deck, conc. drive, brick pavers) / 20,000 SF (lot area) = 58.02% - Variance required since > 35% Please contact our office at (630) 435 -8686 with any questions or comments. '\ Sincerely, James E. Koziol, PE, LEED AP Koziol and Brown, Architects and Engineers Cc: Don Davis ZONING REVIEW CHECKLIST FRONT YARD ADDRESS: 1 t rYS u2 ZONING: R �c LOT AREA [A]: -- Q o, o6Q PROPOSED SETBACKS (�� I SIDE YARD L EXTERIOR /SIDE YARD* 13 =4 1 1 a G t1i b ROOF /DRIVEWAY MEASUREMENT(FT) [2l ROOF HEIGHT [MID -POINT TO AVG. GRADE] _ o 6` DRIVEWAY WIDTH AT GARAGE ` DRIVEWAY WIDTH AT LOT LINE __..( FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) [3] FIRST FLOOR + ATTACHED GARAGE [B] DETACHED GARAGE [C] SECOND FLOOR AND /OR ATTIC ** [ I ] ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 1 * ** [G] ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 2 * ** [Ii] BASEMENT* * ** [ J ] TOTAL FAR (TOTAL / [A] ) (DO NOT FELL IN SHADED AREAS) MEASUREMENT (FT) !4 5g ` t g t&k4T AREA [EXISTING + PROPOSED] (SQ FT) ga ra `2, 08e�- LOT COVERAGE (* *footprint of all structures, existing or new, need to be included * *) AREA [EXISTING + PROPOSED] (SQ FT) HOUSE FOOT PRINT + ATTACHED GARAGE [B] q,3 i 0 DETACHED GARAGE [C] PATIOS AND /OR DECK [F] ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 1 * ** [G] ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 2 * ** [H] TOTAL LOT COVERAGE ( TOTAL / [A] ) * If you live on a comer lot, the exterior setback is the Ionger dimension of the two frontages facing the street ** An attic must be included in the FAR calculations if it has a ceiling height of seven (7) feet or greater. * ** An accessory structure is defined as a subordinate structure detached from but located on the same lot as the principal structure, the use of which is incidental and accessory to that of a principal structure. Said structures may include, but are not limited to, garages and sheds, as further defined by the Village Code. * *** A basement must be included in the FAR calculation if basement level is three (3) feet above average grade. Beam to wall Beam Chek v2011 Licensed to: Phyl1ls Brown Reg # 1194 -67463 Davis Residence Shear (inz) TL Defl (in) Date: 12/12/11 Selection 4x 12 Western Cedar #2 41.68 Lu = 0.0 Ft Conditions NDS 2005 OK OK 56% 19% Min Bearing Area R1= 2.2 W R2= 2.2 in (1.5) DL DO= 0.23 in Data Beam Span 11.58 ft 1.00 1.00 Beam Wt per ft 9.57 # Reaction 1 TL 924 # Reaction 2 TL 924 # Bm Wt Included 111 # Maximum V 924 # Max Moment 2675# Max V (Reduced) 774 # 1.00 TL Max Defl L i 240 TL Actual Defl L 1597 Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adiustments Loads Section (In 3) Shear (inz) TL Defl (in) 73.83 39.38 0.23 41.68 7.49 0.58 OK OK OK 56% 19% 40% Uniform TL: 150 =A Uniform Load A ZLI Ri - 924 R2 = 924 SPAN = 11.58 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. a = f^ BRO WN (P n� 001.,01,3433 If PSA �f�i�r�, A R Gi��I % Fb psi Fv psi E psi x mil) Fc psi Reference Values 700 155 1.0 425 Adjusted Values 770 155 1.0 425 CF Size Factor 1.100 Cd Duration 1.00 1.00 Cr Repetitive 1.00 Ch Smear Stress NIA Cm Wet Use 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cl Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Uniform TL: 150 =A Uniform Load A ZLI Ri - 924 R2 = 924 SPAN = 11.58 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. a = f^ BRO WN (P n� 001.,01,3433 If PSA �f�i�r�, A R Gi��I % Bea mChek v2011 licensed to: Phyllis Brown Reg # 1194 -67463 Davis Residence Main floor Beam Date: 12/12/11 Selection 8x 12 Western Cedar #1 Lu = 0.0 Ft Conditions NDS 2005 Min Searing Area R1= 4.3 in R2= 3.9 in (1.5) DL Defl= 0.44 in Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjus t ments Beam Span 14.58 ft TL Deft (in) 165.31 Beam Wt per ft . 20.96 # Reaction 1 TL 1842 # Reaction 2 TL 1657 # Bm Wt Included 306 # Maximum V 1842 # Max Moment 7758'# Max V (Reduced) 1672 # TL Max Deft L 1240 TL Actual Deft L 1400 Section (in 3) Shear (in TL Deft (in) 165.31 86.25 0.44 95.49 17.92 0.73 OK OK OK 58% 21% 60% Loads Uniform TL: 156 =A Point TL Distance B = 924 5.83 Uniform Load A Pt loads: 0 R1 = 1842 R2 = 1657 SPAN = 14.58 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. s Z * P cis BROWN N r L7� 001- 013433 IL G� ��Tlill1��� Fb psi Fv psi E psi x mil) Fc (psi) Reference Values 975 140 1.0 425 Adjusted Values 975 140 1.0 425 CF Size Factor 1.000 Cd Duration 1.00 1.00 Cr Repetitive 1.00 Ch Shear Stress NIA Cm Wet Use 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cl Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Loads Uniform TL: 156 =A Point TL Distance B = 924 5.83 Uniform Load A Pt loads: 0 R1 = 1842 R2 = 1657 SPAN = 14.58 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. s Z * P cis BROWN N r L7� 001- 013433 IL G� ��Tlill1��� V e BeamChek v2011 licensed to: Phyllis Brown Reg # 1194 -67463 Davis Residence column requied Prepared by: Date: 12/12/11 Selection (4) 2x 6 SPF South #2 Nailed Built -Up Wood Column Conditions NDS 2005, Using values for 2x and 4x solid sawn, Dimension Lumber. Laminate built -up nailed columns per NDS 15.3.3.1 or per local code. Load 1842 # Column Area 33.0 in' Kf 1.00 Actual Height 8.25 ft led 1 Effective Ht 99 in c 0.80 Unbraced L1 8.25 ft le d2 Effective Ht 99 in KcE 0.30 Unbraced L2 8.25 ft Ke Buckling Mode 1.0 FcE 1019 Attributes and Values Controlling d is 5.5 inches Note: A wood plate under this column must have an Fe value, perpendicular to the grain, greater than 56 psi. Data leld psi Area (in 2) Adjusted Values Actual 18 56 33.0 1.00 Cm Wet Use Critical 50 731 2.52 Status OK OK OK Ratio 36% 8% 8% Note: A wood plate under this column must have an Fe value, perpendicular to the grain, greater than 56 psi. Data 14 BROWN n 001-01 AR Fe II (psi) E (psi x mil) Reference Values 1000 1.1 Adjusted Values 731 1.1 CF Size Factor 1.10 Cd Duration 1.00 Cm Wet Use 1.00 1.00 Cp Stability 0.66 14 BROWN n 001-01 AR FLAT Of SURVEY LEGAL D25CRIPTION: LOT 8 IN BLOCK I IN WEDGEWOOD TFRRACE, A 5UBDIV1510N OF EUCLID AVENUE PART OF THE FAST HALF OF 5ECTION 27, TOWN51 42 NORTH, RANGE 1 1, EAST Of THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MARCH 4, 1 946 A5 DOCUMENT NUMBER 13732 J 46, 1N COOK COUNTY, ILLINOI5. I � f N l� %" I 1 K 20' 40' ml LUCO CON5TKUCTION CO. P ' 99135 , �Llfur ura[ I I JIM KOZIAL c.,y, a 600 s 847.658.tl537 7 VNL. &47.459.0714 Cu nlLV wcvr. sumry vrpwu g,. LOT 7 a eo nneo C11R6 ,E -07.�r FNU 112" 1 1-28531 PND I(2" g MAP. REBAR Q N 89 t (A55UMED) 200.09' MEAS. 200.0' FtCORD :. O . 5' WOOD FENCE Q - cz I 0.36' vj 103.55' 1 V O -- 75.06' • U O I .d5 0 w WOOD ° "T' Q LOT 8 • O <j .7A' OECK v I LhIIMNEY n'dz' om om •a to O ••� n8.65' _ IY Q f 7.66' E '.' 4 _ �• 'T• O N c d 2'J AS' - b - L1R1C.K PAVE WRI R Ln _ - `STEP •• �� • h h y ••' � 30.Id •; "• 49.s L.L 6) FRAME ,, cgvc. .� m #1 105 a = u GARAGE '• ' TWO STORY BRICK FRAME °` m • b ••• RE5IDLNCE w o a N - Y.731 - 5:65' aA.Lrvarrrnsrrrr _ L CDNL. RIBBON m n RE R E - A L $AIDS "RYEY ALL AEOVE O I AK- PWVE $AR ORREGrLYREP CTA— olsrnxccs APestpm� IH rccrArmoccwALSrleucor. CONC. PoeBON 5'WOOD PENCE .�ro�ue.orol r�AO� oo umrlEs 5 89 °55'41" W 200.34' MEA5. 200.0' Rl!CORD E"Easnc" vx 1HE Aswe vESCRIeEarnaECnx LEG1 sruxuROg rvn. souuour+suRVti FND 112' __• C.T�A4E!SEE0.Uxpg P"OEEgsp - wcsumeYVnm —1. KE13AP LOT 0 FND I P u C rME9E8CRiPl10HOi ttrE MArSNMpEE0. "ror,nePaumrarneES � ®rl'f vErcA ae PEOwmu"r g4rdM1AEWEl "OIER N'fl£" � ®av urnrclESwmnM1Exseu [xrs + uLE UO+srgwu,sAEa+. cnouwumincs Ixcwwue sur rlvr uulrev to E ' cowu+sn,loc.eLESI�P Axrr "A xoreEE "srravrr ' ' ®rn HENCON. YC105NM1grR fNIEEO 6EAL9RRE0 STAUP, ' N l� %" I 1 K 20' 40' ml LUCO CON5TKUCTION CO. P ' 99135 , �Llfur ura[ Rw�s31 JIM KOZIAL c.,y, a 600 s 847.658.tl537 a, u7, DAVIS &47.459.0714 Cu nlLV wcvr. sumry vrpwu g,. 's�cr nv. rou m eo: eo nneo ,E -07.�r Wr 1 1-28531 �. A pAViS F ES1Pk - hIGE .rw.wrmu.ra, nae Otl�iYiIAA�AlL 1[CClp ItCCR ILNi i °�^ M�OII%SITArCM�FA %MlYyeyy � I EMS NE fiE KOZIOL AND BROWN: ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS PROJECT DIRECTORY: OWNER: DON DAVIS INIS A ELMHURST READ MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 40066 ARCHITECTr 0z1DL AND BROWN ARtlHTECTS AND LNDINLLRS '671 OWEN 0.YENJE LISLE IL 60559 wl4)5 969R DESIGN FIR. II84 CIVIL ENGINEER: KNIEL ENGINEERING SERVICES 1621 OWEN AYCNUE USER, !L 6059$ 6)01455405 DES]w FIRN NMf000968 CITY OF NAPERVILLE: B'JILDIND MPARTNENT 400 5 EAGLE $T NAPERVILLE, IL 60610 6)0!4206070 �W W cm : .. Luo Lu La qp k i Lu ] r W4 F 7C ei y w I hERE BT CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS WERE 1106 N ELMHURST W. MOUNT PROSPECT, R. PREPARED BY at OR UNDER MT OUMRVISION ADDITION TO EXISTING HOUR AND TO THE BEST OF TAT KNOWLEDGE RESIDENIIAL COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. 111U��U PHTLLI5 6. BROWN LIOENSEV A"ITECT Z T! EA S A-0 PAGED A -O THRWWI E -) a 40 Dole 55X OF THE TOrA1 LOT AREA SETBAOKS FcDoeo.. A -17 SHEET INDEX: ARCNITECTOXAI A-0 LIVER FADE Al CUNSTRUCTIONS NOTES • SPECIFICATIENS A+2 MR0105E0 ELEVATIONS A -2 PROPOSED ELoO.R PLANS PROJECT INFORMATION: PROJECT AODRU55: 1106 N ELMHURST W. MOUNT PROSPECT, R. PROJCCT DCSCRIPT10% ADDITION TO EXISTING HOUR PROPERTY USE RESIDENIIAL SITE ZM!Mt R -x MAX 5U:LDINS HEIDNT: 2A STORIES I )9 MAX ROOF PEAK HEIOHT- 40 MAx LOT OMMOE RATIO: 55X OF THE TOrA1 LOT AREA SETBAOKS FcDoeo.. FEN YARD: W SICE YARD. 8- MIN. PER SIDE 12P TOTAL AFAR YARD, 95X LOT OEPTN, NOT TO EXCEED )0' EXISTING: FRONT YAR1 31.65 NORTH SIX YARD. 15.75 SOUTH SIDE YARC. 16.96 REAR YkiD 11949 PROPOSED: FRONT TAW. MAV - NORTH SIOE TARO N.T9 1 SOUTH s!X YARD: REAR TARO: I6?5' R2.50 PROPOSED ADDITION DOES NOT EXTEND INTO SIDE AND REAR YARD RT84CK6 TOTAL HEIGHT OF PROPOSED ADDITION 9R-Nin- FROM AYG OkADE NO PART OF THE PPM05CD ADDITION L NC R OAC :E ON ANS Y OF THE RESIDGITIAL i N I SCALE, N/A LOCATION MAP: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUILDING CODES. 2006 INTERNATIONAL 5VILDING CODE WITH LOOL AMENDMENTS 2OC6 INrCFNAI[DNAL RES1DENr1AL CODE WITH LNT AME0MEN1`5 20DI I11iERMA110NAL FIRE OOOE 2006 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY 4AIN7ENANCE CODE DOSS INTERNATIONAL FLECTRIC COOS 2006 INTERNATIONAL FEEL ONG WOE 2006 IN ERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CEDE WOOS INMR Ttt%AL PLUM5:N0 0 2005 NATIONAL LLCCTRIC CODE 9004 ILLINOIS STATE PLUMBIND CODE ILLINOIS AOCESSAILITY CODE, CURNE4r COITION 2009 M .URATIONAL ENE99T CONSERVATION COOS € Y W ^ Y F o ��' � � R �'` � •F gds n � � € n n e� �� �� Egg ssS 4 y� gg ]a i nj s k$ �RL � b � y £q # Y{ �a F R £ R id a �10A R12QU c d Ti 2.A S xaIMp -e ��y � � aE "•t� S D r gln p . 8 a I °fix °_ E R_.. R -` a k' a R mss: - ..�m x ^ Rg MIN xa y a §.,a 3 w R=-'" 8 � s �� M 3' i�'� F� eg' B - R • R �� € ➢,*,m z ��5`s� ,�� }} a-0 P �Eb � "���L�z�.��aa gg 5!1 7 q e. ° fib R 9 X a a . S EA i- R3�E3 si k @$ '$ $ ^ € ,. 2 R ` G g Ea Via. E6i a Ey Z'.p x {3c ° g`R i ^ R g pa ��sa$ € - e . €_eR'ag e i a x " ^R z ks�3 §o- aaex ^ � �� MOM " X' R ^ih €�� Y � �E 2 ° 8 ' RiA i iEE . 8� E F y �.``�S E 0. ....3 ` R ' "a ir-.. aaa "Q F. s 8 €_rte ##g# 44 8 g s h I ;I € R48Rq 8 s e v € a P ffit�8 F €- & aR € F� '3 �Faa3 E F i s $ 88 a xx $ $ R � $ s P = y ?E ° k �fi °_. QQ�3 p ri$ x ss �5dq F�g yFG F F R R 8 $R y gkGRFi� IN »Rn o �^�` A�.MA 3333 ^�0 R 2 � s � s " NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS DAVIS RESIDENCE Mwrt P:ogmm nun's 9 Eon e R � R Fmm n N C rTl MFR PAFFF rn C � n �N n ~ O (J � a „ Alrn $ NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS DAVIS RESIDENCE Mwrt P:ogmm nun's 9 e � '1' E 99.71' MEAS. 100.0' RECCIRD n N I 0' ERSCMEI 0 C � n �N n ~ O (J � a „ NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS DAVIS RESIDENCE Mwrt P:ogmm nun's 0 r A m pE 9c N ^ 4 m = : �n 3� q^ A 3 fn 0 4 61a ��Y i _ _0 BUILDING ELMHURST READ F7 C n D 77 z [r N " H ' ` K©ZIM ENGINEERING SERVICES E S'�3 @.� `, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS acgec.n..- ca..cacN.- i.ovs".. '1' E 99.71' MEAS. 100.0' RECCIRD I 0' ERSCMEI I i; n �N n ~ 0 r A m pE 9c N ^ 4 m = : �n 3� q^ A 3 fn 0 4 61a ��Y i _ _0 BUILDING ELMHURST READ F7 C n D 77 z [r N " H ' ` K©ZIM ENGINEERING SERVICES E S'�3 @.� `, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS acgec.n..- ca..cacN.- i.ovs".. k} ., -: AVE WWF � 9 : \ ! ur g § ■| 9 E |! � � \� ) \y2 ,@ ®\) (� § § \ �t § ! � • SOUTH ELEV TON «EST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION ,�,� . . p WALL SECTION $ 2 §qLw LL +CT:m UNE%CAVATE➢ W ' � � � GNE)fCAVA7EN w " FRU PLAN ire SI l u in �tMtIS b N Ga LM �1+.IX0 °M6rnlbt nry° N e ilr u,rume . Rn°x xm.wae n,re,u, a.el m.xm a v vw xaiwx n, ).,,m R., 4 ur. sl �, S6s'm+ -+ue sr)pes eai x Inwreo.r . wsx) wi ro vem ,s. ------------ Wv9. 64N 61� '� V !� pe xott v OPEN To AKVE y w # ___�&w+ { due wil _ »� »• -_. S fez w xQ �n � 5a �C �F eke g� 5d �. w -E R OOF PLAN ROOF VENT SCHEDULE w 19T FLOOR ELEC PLAN 2ND FLOOR EI_FC PLAN y nxe� r�ry `ro ee�`� °.� uid, eci � u� s A eu misr W i W er e er e emer ea, rare+ �eeo� ° :x`� ° r,a u ` riPeM1li]�iw�nS �ue �°� wrwiLUi�edhM[0 A -3 w " 2NR XL00R PLAN 5 w m 1ST FLOOR PLAN ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1108 NORTH ELMHURST ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Ms. Linda Davis (Petitioner) has filed a petition for Variations with respect to property located at 1108 North Elmhurst Road ( "Property') and legally described as follows: Lot 8 in Block 1 in Wedgewood Terrace, a Subdivision of part of the east half of Section 27, Township 42 north, Range 11, east of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the Plat thereof recorded March 4, 1946 as document number 13732148, in Cook County, Illinois. Property Index Number: 03 -27- 305 - 014 -0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks Variations to (1) increase the floor area from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 7,088.63 square feet (35.44 %) and (2) increase the overall lot coverage from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 11,600.63 square feet (58.02 %); and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Variations being the subject of PZ -32 -11 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26 of January, 2012, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal on the 11th of January, 2012; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and negative recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in denial of the requests being the subject of PZ- 32 -11; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the requests meet the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variations to (1) increase the floor area from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 7,088.63 square feet (35.44 %) and (2) increase the overall lot coverage from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 11,600.63 square feet (58.02 %) for the two (2)- story building addition would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant Variations, to (1) increase the floor area from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 7,088.63 square feet (35.44 %) and (2) increase the overall lot coverage from 7,000 square feet (35 %) to 11,600.63 square feet (58.02 %) for a two (2)- story building addition as shown on the petitioner's site plane prepared by Koziol Engineering Services dated December 12, 2011, a copy of which is attached to and made part of this Ordinance as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. Page 2/2 PZ -32 -11 SECTION FOUR This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of February, 2012. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H: \CLKO\ WIN\ ORDINANCE2\ Variations1108nelmhurstroadfeb ,2012.doc € Y W ^ Y F o ��' � � R �'` � •F gds n � � € n n e� �� �� Egg ssS 4 y� gg ]a i nj s k$ �RL � b � y £q # Y{ �a F R £ R id a �10A R12QU c d Ti 2.A S xaIMp -e ��y � � aE "•t� S D r gln p . 8 a I °fix °_ E R_.. R -` a k' a R mss: - ..�m x ^ Rg MIN xa y a §.,a 3 w R=-'" 8 � s �� M 3' i�'� F� eg' B - R • R �� € ➢,*,m z ��5`s� ,�� }} a-0 P �Eb � "���L�z�.��aa gg 5!1 7 q e. ° fib R 9 X a a . S EA i- R3�E3 si k @$ '$ $ ^ € ,. 2 R ` G g Ea Via. E6i a Ey Z'.p x {3c ° g`R i ^ R g pa ��sa$ € - e . €_eR'ag e i a x " ^R z ks�3 §o- aaex ^ � �� MOM " X' R ^ih €�� Y � �E 2 ° 8 ' RiA i iEE . 8� E F y �.``�S E 0. ....3 ` R ' "a ir-.. aaa "Q F. s 8 €_rte ##g# 44 8 g s h I ;I € R48Rq 8 s e v € a P ffit�8 F €- & aR € F� '3 �Faa3 E F i s $ 88 a xx $ $ R � $ s P = y ?E ° k �fi °_. QQ�3 p ri$ x ss �5dq F�g yFG F F R R 8 $R y gkGRFi� IN »Rn o �^�` A�.MA 3333 ^�0 R 2 � s � s " NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS DAVIS RESIDENCE Mwrt P:ogmm nun's 9 Eon e R � R Fmm n N C rTl MFR PAFFF rn C � n �N n ~ O (J � a „ Alrn $ NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS DAVIS RESIDENCE Mwrt P:ogmm nun's 9 e � '1' E 99.71' MEAS. 100.0' RECCIRD n N I 0' ERSCMEI 0 C � n �N n ~ O (J � a „ NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS DAVIS RESIDENCE Mwrt P:ogmm nun's 0 r A m pE 9c N ^ 4 m = : �n 3� q^ A 3 fn 0 4 61a ��Y i _ _0 BUILDING ELMHURST READ F7 C n D 77 z [r N " H ' ` K©ZIM ENGINEERING SERVICES E S'�3 @.� `, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS acgec.n..- ca..cacN.- i.ovs".. '1' E 99.71' MEAS. 100.0' RECCIRD I 0' ERSCMEI I i; n �N n ~ 0 r A m pE 9c N ^ 4 m = : �n 3� q^ A 3 fn 0 4 61a ��Y i _ _0 BUILDING ELMHURST READ F7 C n D 77 z [r N " H ' ` K©ZIM ENGINEERING SERVICES E S'�3 @.� `, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS acgec.n..- ca..cacN.- i.ovs".. Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2012 SUBJECT: PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE INCREASE PURPOSE: To present for the Board's consideration an ordinance increasing the Village's water and sewer rates. BACKGROUND: The Village follows the practice of approving moderate annual increases in water and sewer rates, as opposed to implementing large increases periodically. The 2012 Budget included a 5.0% increase in water and sewer rates. This rate increase became effective with billings after January 1, 2012. Results from an updated five -year rate study prepared in response to the City of Chicago water rate increase indicate a need for a subsequent rate adjustment of 9.5% for billings after May 1, 2012. DISCUSSION: Attachment A is a summary of water and sewer rate projections needed to support the water and sewer fund over the next five years. This five -year forecast includes the rate increases scheduled by the City of Chicago for the supply of water through the Joint Action Water Agency. Also built into the calculations is the gradual reduction in the Special Service Area (SSA) #5 property tax levy. The SSA #5 levy will be reduced over a period of six years from its current $1.5 million to $0. The summary table shows the projected water rate (column a), projected sewer rate (column b), the combined total rate (column c) and percent increase from the prior year (column d). Based on the forecast, rates in the first year are projected to go up 13.2 %. The larger first -year increase is due to the extraordinary rate increase (25.0 %) from the City of Chicago that went into effect on February 15. Increases to the water and sewer rates generated from the study range from 6.5% to 9.1 % over the following four years of the forecast. A level rate increase scenario, similar to the one found in the five -year forecast, was presented to the Village Board at the January 24 Committee of the Whole. The level rate scenario smoothes the rate spikes expected over the next four years. Using the level rate scenario, the increase becomes 9.5% (versus 13.2% using five -year forecast). The increase in the following two years is also projected at 9.5 %. The projected rate increase drops to 9.0% and 5.0% for 2015 and 2016 respectively. Detail on the proposed rates and percent increase using the level rate scenario is shown in columns (e) and (f) of the forecast. Water and Sewer Rate Increase February 15, 2012 Page 2 The following table illustrates the recommended rates as reflected in the proposed ordinance. Inside Village Current Rate Per 1,000 Gallons Proposed Rate Per 1,000 Gallons Percent Change Water $5.31 $5.98 12.6% Sewer $1.71 $1.71 0.0% Combined $7.02 $7.69 9.5% For sewer users not connected to the Village's water system, whether located inside or outside the Village, the monthly charge per dwelling unit will not change from the current rate of $4.58. No increase is proposed for the $5.00 per month sewer construction fee. If a Mount Prospect household uses 15,000 gallons of water over a two -month period, their bimonthly water and sewer usage fee would be $125.35, an increase of $10.05 from the current rate. No increase is being proposed for the monthly availability charge assessed customers outside of Special Service Area No. 5. For most customers, those with a 5/8" water line, the charge will remain at $10. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Village Board approve the attached ordinance increasing water and sewer rates effective for bills rendered on or after May 1, 2012. David O. Erb Finance Director DOE/ CADocuments and Settings \derb \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \LX8XUAY4 \Board Memo - February 2012.docx SO C N E L U co i co N U co N L O U o C N cu CO _ N N " CO j J � O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 W) W) W) 0 0 wi w I* N O LW) 1� 00 69 O O EJT fi} EJT Ei} 69- 0 0 0 0 U. N LO co — LO C' co O O O U co 69- Q E N E O C U) co N CD C CO N CD 2 C O E K) 6 6 6 61} CD 0 E� � N 0 N � � N co W O N LO L r I— co I— co co co ^ N y-+ c r F L L Q!, N r— O co co O M O N r— N o0 a a N N LO O O r-� 00 00 ' (n EA EA EA EA EA EA t5 t5 co w w co co L L co co T d L CN N co — O v v N N N 0 N N N N N N N L 0. L 0 Ud r .. N .. N .. N .. N .. .. N Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY 20, 2012 SUBJECT: WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY PURPOSE To present the results of a water and sewer rate study conducted for the purpose of determining funding needs for water and sewer operations. BACKGROUND A water and sewer rate study is done each year during the budget process to determine an appropriate combined utility rate for water and sewer service for the upcoming year. Subsequent to the 2012 budget process the Village was notified that the City of Chicago (Mount Prospect's Lake Michigan water supplier) will implement a four year extraordinary water rate increase amounting to 25% in 2012 and 15% in each of the three subsequent years. This will likely result in a supplemental and potentially substantial increase in municipal water and sewer rates (over and above the 5% programmed increase) early in 2012. In response to this news, a revised water rate study was conducted to determine the extent of an increase absent any adjustments to the water and sewer budget. The study takes into consideration the regular growth in operating expenses, ongoing capital needs, and the pending City of Chicago water rate increase. DISCUSSION The Water and Sewer Fund is classified as a Proprietary Fund, which means revenue generated through user charges and other water and sewer related functions is intended to fully support the operation of the fund. An analysis was conducted on the water and sewer fund to determine the appropriate level of user charges needed to support regular operating expenditures. Expenditures include the programmed increase in water charges by the City of Chicago. Included in the attachments are summary sheets of the results of the study. Attachment A is a summary of projected operating and capital expenses for the five -year period 2012 -2016. Attachment B is a summary of water and sewer rate projections needed to support the projected spending plan during the same five - year period. Attachments C1 -05 are the individual rate calculation sheets illustrating how the rate projections were derived. Attachment D is a summary of rates being charged by other JAWA communities, Mount Prospect residents supplied by Illinois American Water and select neighboring communities. An explanation of each of the attachment will follow. Attachment A is a summary of projected operating and capital expenses for the five -year period beginning 2012. This information was pulled from the 2012 Budget with no changes Water & Sewer Rate Study January 20, 2012 Page 2 except for one item. Total capital expenditures for the 2013 Forecast were proposed at $4,343,000. In preparing the rate study, the annual amount of capital spending was limited to $2.5 million for 2013 and all the remaining years of the study. Column (a) of Attachment A shows total annual expenditures for the Water and Sewer Fund. Columns (b -d) show capital expenditures broken down by water and sewer functions with a sub- total for all capital expenditures. Columns (e -g) show the operating expenditures again broken down by water and sewer with an operating sub - total. The final column, column (h) is the average growth in operating expenditures over the five -year period. Based on this information, the growth in operating expenditures averages 6.33 %. The annual increase to water rates has been 4 -5% the past several years. This was done to have more moderate increases on a regular basis than large spikes to the rate every few years. Attachment B is a summary of water and sewer rate projections needed to support the projected spending plan during the five -year period. The summary table shows the projected water rate, projected sewer rate, the combined total rate and percent increase from the prior year. Based on the current spending plan, rates in the first year are projected to go up 13.2 %. This is in addition to the 5.0% programmed increase that went into effect January 1, 2012. The larger first -year increase is due to the extraordinary rate increase (25.0 %) from the City of Chicago that also went into effect on January 1. Increases to the water and sewer rates generated from the study range from 2.5% to 8.3% over the next four years. Attachments C1 through C5 are the individual rate calculation worksheets illustrating how the rate projections were derived. The top section of each worksheet includes the formula used to arrive at the projected water rate. The water rate includes both an operating and a capital expense component. Revenues generated outside the water charge are deducted from total expenses. For water purposes these are Special Service Area taxes and other !miscellaneous revenues (interest income, tap -on fees, etc.). The new total is then divided by estimated number of gallons billed (1.3 billion) to come up with the projected water rate„ As a side note, the Special Service Levy adds approximately $1.19 per 1,000 gallons to the water rate and is set to expire in 2017 per Village Ordinance. The next section of the worksheet includes the formula used to arrive at the projected sewer rate. Again, the sewer rate consists of an operating and a capital expense component. Like the water rate, revenues generated outside of sewer charges are deducted from total expenses. For sewer purposes this includes the sewer construction fee, interest income and other miscellaneous revenues. The new total is then divided by estimated number of gallons billed to come up with the projected sewer rate. The third section of the worksheet provides information on the current rate and proposed rate according to the expenditure formula. This section also includes the dollar and percent increase from the current rate to the proposed rate adjustment. For example, on Attachment C1, the current water rate is $5.31. The current sewer rate is $1.71 for a total combined rate of $7.02. The proposed rate per the formula is $6.27 for water and $1.67 for sewer for a total combined rate of $7.94. The rate increase to support the new rates by City of Chicago is $0.92 or 13.2 %. The same methodology is used to determine water and sewer rates for years two through five of the study. Water & Sewer Rate Study January 20, 2012 Page 3 Attachment D is a summary of rates being charged by other JAWA communities, Mount Prospect residents supplied by Illinois American Water and select neighboring communities. The current Mount Prospect combined rate for those users on the Village water system is $7.02 (per 1,000 gallons), The average rate among the communities surveyed is $7.07 with a high rate being charged to Mount Prospect residents serviced by Illinois American Water, $6.82 plus monthly service fee of $50.11. The low rate is from Arlington Heights with a rate of $4.74 plus a monthly service fee of $5.20. CONCLUSION Barring any relief from the City of Chicago from their planned rate increase or significant reductions in operating or water system capital projects, the increase to rates resulting from the study are necessary to maintain funding needed to support ongoing operations. The additional cost to the typical homeowner as a result of implementing the rate increase in year one is $82.80 per year (assuming 15,000 gallons of usage every two months). Another item that will need to be addressed is the elimination of the Special Service Area #5 levy which is set to expire in 2017. Options for dealing with this loss of revenue include: 1) a level reduction approach (having smaller, regular reductions in the levy beginning in 2012) or, 2) deferring reduction of the levy until the programmed increases from the City of Chicago are absorbed (2015 levy). The level reduction scenario will add an additional $0.17 to the water rate beginning in 2013 while the deferred reduction scenario will add an additional $0.29 to the water rate beginning in 2016. Information provided with this memo will be included in my presentation on the water rate study at the January 24 Committee of the Whole meeting. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. DAVID O. ERB FINANCE DIRECTOR DOE Copy: Finance Commission lAWater & Sewer\2012 Rate Increase \Strategic Planning Meeting - January 2012\2012 W &S Rate Study.docx s+ N CO M O9 CO fo N 00 Co It M 00 OO 6 OV Co ea LO 0 ti T N m OO Co r T o N © C ~ In 0 l M N N CL 0) 0 ti It p M 40 o T N N C�! O W T T T T O) C N L3 co X W O CO qq 00 C In Co co W 1 Q !0 T T T T T 0 co co m v CIIL o o Q V i n O w of T T T r CL 6 o d O) O3 IL x U W C 0 C OO o C C N N [Ff i to . 2 � ' 0 N CD CD (D r ! O N 5 N e m C N x W CwN N CV N CJ t CU n. c = 0 > ° _ ° o o O o s cu :6 00 ° o ° o ° o � 1 qq: L L © o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co C U T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T �n o r-. CM, ti cLOo t� o to c0 N q�p It co co co co 0 m co (*') 0) x W N T m T T T L T r to � >- T C 04 T C N T C3 N O 04 O 04 a Attachment B Village of Mount Prospect Water/Sewer Rate Summary 2012-2016 Year Water Rate Sewer Rate Total Rate % Increase Current Water and Sewer Rates 2012 $5.31 $171 $7.02 4.93% Proposed Water and Sewer Rates 20!12 $6,27 $1.67 $7.94 13,2%; 2013 $6.61 $117 $8,37 5.4% 2014 $7.27 $1.79 $9,06 8.3% 2015 $7.76 $1.82 $9.58 5.7% 2016 $7,98 $1.84 $9,82 2.5% 0 � Attachment C-1 Village uY Mount Prospect Water and Sewer Rate Calculation 2O12 Budget Year LALater Rate Formula: VVR= Water Rate G8A5= Special Service Area #5 Tax Revenue OP=OparaUonmExpenditures OR= Othe Revenue O8=Debt Service Expenditures Vol = Annual Water Bi|KnQ (per 1.000 gallons) Cap = Capital Expenditures ��^� / �� *8.27 8.419.237 0 1.417.800 (1.516.000) ( 164 . 500 ) 1^300`000 §ower Rate� Formula: Where: 8R= Sewe Rate OR~ Other Revenue OP= Operations Expenditures Vol =Annual Water Billing (per 1.DD0gallons) DG~ Debt Service Expenditures SVVR Fee =$5 per month, per account fee Cap = Capital Expenditures SR= OR Fee $1.67 1.576,688 U 1.415.000 (34.500) (786.000) 1.300,000 Water Sewer� Total Total Current Rate $5.31 $111 $7.82 2O12 Proposed Rate Per Expenditure Formula $0.27 $1 �87 $T94 $|wcreeme % Increase i Attachment C -2 Village of Mount Prospect Water and Sewer Rate Calculation 2013 Budget Year Water Rate Formula: WR= (OP +DS + Cap - SSA5 - OR) /Vol Where: WR = Water Rate SSA5 = Special Service Area #5 Tax Revenue OP = Operations Expenditures OR = Other Revenue DS = Debt Service Expenditures Vol = Annual Water Billing ( per 1,000 gallons) Cap = Capital Expenditures WR = (OP + DS + Cap . SSA5 - OR) / Vol $6.61 9,268,885 0 1,000,000 (1,516,000) (164,500) 1,300,000 Sewer Rate Formula: SR= (OP +DS + Cap -OR -new rev) /Vol Where: SR = Sewer Rate OR = Other Revenue OP = Operations Expenditures Vol = Annual Water Billing ( per 1,000 gallons) DS = Debt Service Expenditures SWR Fee = $5 per month, per account fee Cap = Capital Expenditures SR= (OP + DS + Cap - OR - SWR Fee)/ Vol $1.77 1,615,765 0 1,500,000 (34,500) (786,000) 1,300,000 Water Sewer Total 2012 Rate Per Expenditure Formula $6.27 $1.67 $7.94 2013 Rate Per Expenditure Formula $6.61 $1.77 $8.37 $ Increase $0.43 % Increase 5.4% Attachment C -3 Village of Mount Prospect Water and Sewer Rate Calculation 2014 Budget Year Water Rate Formula: WR = (OP + DS + Cap - SSA5 - OR) / Vol Where: WR = Water Rate SSA5 = Special Service Area #5 Tax Revenue OP = Operations Expenditures OR = Other Revenue DS = Debt Service Expenditures Vol = Annual Water Billing ( per 1,000 gallons) Cap = Capital Expenditures WR = OP + DS + Ca - SSA5 - OR / Vol $7.27 10,136,046 0 1,000,000 (1,516,000) (164,500) 1,300,000 Sewer Rate Formula: SR= (OP +DS + Cap -OR -new rev) /Vol Where: SR = Sewer Rate OR = Other Revenue OP = Operations Expenditures Vol = Annual Water Billing ( per 1,000 gallons) DS = Debt Service Expenditures SWR Fee = $5 per month, per account fee Cap = Capital Expenditures SR= (OP + DS + Cap - OR - SWR Fee)/ Vol $1.79 1,648,080 0 1,500,000 (34,500) (786,000) 1,300,000 Water Sewer Total 2013 Rate Per Expenditure Formula $6.61 $1.77 $8.37 2014 Rate Per Expenditure Formula $7.27 $1.79 $9.06 $ Increase $0.69 % Increase 8.3% Attachment C -4 Village of Mount Prospect Water and Sewer Rate Calculation 2015 Budget Year Water Rate Formula: WR = (OP + DS + Cap - SSA5 - OR) / Vol Where: WR = Water Rate OP = Operations Expenditures DS = Debt Service Expenditures Cap = Capital Expenditures WR = (OP + DS + $7.76 10,772,669 SSA5 = Special Service Area #5 Tax Revenue OR = Other Revenue Vol = Annual Water Billing ( per 1,000 gallons) Cap - SSA5 - OR) / Vol 0 1,000,000 (1,516,000) (164,500) 1,300,000 Sewer Rate Formula: SR = (OP + DS + Cap - OR - new rev) / Vol Where: SR = Sewer Rate OR = Other Revenue OP = Operations Expenditures Vol = Annual Water Billing ( per 1,000 gallons) DS = Debt Service Expenditures SWR Fee = $5 per month, per account fee Cap = Capital Expenditures SR= (OP + DS + Cap OR - SWR Fee)/ Vol $1.82 1,681,042 0 1,500,000 (34,500) (786,000) 1,300,000 2014 Rate Per Expenditure Formula 2015 Rate Per Expenditure Formula Water Sewer Total $7.27 $1.79 $9.06 $7.76 $1.82 $9.58 $ Increase $0.52 % Increase 5.7% Attachment C -5 Village of Mount Prospect Water and Sewer Rate Calculation 2016 Budget Year Water Rate Formula: WR = (OP + DS + Cap - SSA5 - OR) / Vol Where: WR = Water Rate SSA5 = Special Service Area #5 Tax Revenue OP = Operations Expenditures OR = Other Revenue DS = Debt Service Expenditures Vol = Annual Water Billing ( per 1,000 gallons) Cap = Capital Expenditures WR = OP + DS + Ca - SSA5 $7.98 11,048,407 0 1,000,000 (1,516,000) (164,500) Vol 1,300,000 Sewer Rate Formula: SR = (OP + DS + Cap - OR - new rev) / Vol Where: SR = Sewer Rate OP = Operations Expenditures DS = Debt Service Expenditures Cap = Capital Expenditures SR = OP + DS + $1,84 1,714,663 0 OR = Other Revenue Vol = Annual Water Billing ( per 1,000 gallons) SWR Fee = $5 per month, per account fee Ca mm OR - SWR Fee L/ Vol 1,500,000 (34,500) (786,000) 1,300,000 2015 Rate Per Expenditure Formula 2016 Rate Per Expenditure Formula Water Sewe Total $7.76 '$1,82 $'9.58 $7.98 $1,84 $0.82 $ Increase % Increase Attachment D Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Water Rate Comparison JAWA Communities, Neighboring Communities and Illinois American Water (MP) High Rolling Meadows $9.90 Low Arlington Heights $4.74 Average All Communities $7.07 Notes: (1) Rates adjusted for increase from City of Chicago. Monthly Water Sewer Total Service Fee JAWA Communites Elk Grove Village $5.50 $1.75 $7.25 $0.00 Hanover Park $4.91 $1.85 $6.76 $0.00 Hoffman Estates $4.67 $0.98 $5.65 $0.00 Mount Prospect $5.31 $1.71 $7.02 $0.00 Rolling Meadows $7.40 $2.50 $9.90 $3.00 (�) Schaumburg $5.48 $1.14 $6.62 $2.48 Streamwood $5.54 $3.69 $9.23 $0.00 Neighboring Communities Arlington Heights $4.14 $0.60 $4.74 $5.20 Des Plaines $5.45 $1.22 $6.67 $0.00 (�) Illinois American Water Mount Prospect 6.76 0.06 $6.82 $50.11 High Rolling Meadows $9.90 Low Arlington Heights $4.74 Average All Communities $7.07 Notes: (1) Rates adjusted for increase from City of Chicago. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND WATER AND SEWER RATES SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A, DIVISION II OF THE VILLAGE CODE Passed and approved by the President and Board of Trustees the day of March, 2012. Published in pamphlet form by authority of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, the day of March, 2012. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND WATER AND SEWER RATES SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A, DIVISION II OF THE VILLAGE CODE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE That Section 22.504.2 entitled "Water Rates" of Appendix A, Division II of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 22.504.2 of Appendix A, Division II shall be and read as follows: " See. 22.504.2 WATER RATES: A. All village users within the village, having a direct or indirect connection with village water mains or pipes: $5.98 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof. All village users outside the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with village water mains or pipes: $11.96 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof. All village users located outside the boundaries of Special Service Area Number 5 shall pay an additional monthly availability charge based upon the size of the water meter as follows: 5/8 inch meter $ 10.00 3 /4 inch meter $ 15.00 1 inch meter $ 30.00 1% inch meter $ 50.00 2 inch meter $ 90.00 3 inch meter $150.00 4 inch meter $250.00 6 inch meter $475.00 8 inch meter $990.00 B. Hook -up charge for water furnished by the truckload: $10.00." SECTION TWO That Section 22.504.3 entitled "Sewer Rates" of Appendix A, Division II of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 22.5043 of Appendix A, Division II shall be and read as follows: " See. 22.504.3 SEWER RATES: C. All village seNver users within the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with the village seNver and water mains or pipes: $1.71 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof. All village sewer users within the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with the village's sewer mains or pipes and not with the village water mains or pipes: $4.58 per month per dwelling unit. All village sewer users outside the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with the village's water and sewer mains or pipes: $1.71 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof. All village sewer users outside the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with the village's sewer mains or pipes, but not with village water mains or pipes: $4.58 per month per dwelling unit." SECTION THREE That the fees set forth in this Ordinance shall be applied to all water and sewer bills rendered on or after Mav 1, 2012. SECTION FOUR That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2012. Irvana K. Willcs, Village President ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell, Village Cleric