Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. NEW BUSINESS 4/16/02 illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2002 SUBJECT: PC-19-01 - KESSEL PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION 211 WEST KENSINGTON ROAD The Planning and Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PC-19-01 Kessel Resubdivision, a request to consolidate six lots of record, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request at their March 28, 2002 meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed plat, found that the plat and proposed easements met Village codes and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the Kessel Resubdivision, Case No. PC-19-01, 211 West Kensington Road. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their April 16, 2002 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter. illage of MOunt Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Background Petitioner: Requested Action: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK SUZANNE MAS0, LONG RANGE PLANNER FEBRUARY 7, 2002 PC-19-2001/KESSEL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION/211 WEST KENSINGTON ROAD Mr. Dennis Kessel 211 West Kensington Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Plat of resubdivision consolidating six lots creating one lot of record Analysis The petitioner is seeking to consolidate six lots creating one lot of record. The subject property is located at 211 West Kensington, west of Elmhurst Road. This plat is part of Mr. Kessel's building permit application. The petitioner is rebuilding part of his home after a recent.fire. The consolidation is required to meet Zoning Code requirements, which do not allow structure to be built over tot lines. The proposed plat of resubdivision seeks to create one lot of record. The plat and new lot comply with Development Code requirements and the petitioner is not seeking relief from the Development Code or the Zoning Ordinance. Recommendation The proposed plat of subdivision is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Kessel Plat of Resubdivision, for the property located at 211 West Kensington, Mount Prospect Case No. PC-19-01. I concur: William J. do'ney, AICP } Director of Community Development ount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VILLAGE ENGINEER FEBRUARY 2, 2002 PC-19-01, KESSEL'S PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION (KENSINGTON RD., BETWEEN PINE ST. AND RUSSEL ST.) The Engineering Division has reviewed the Plat of Resubdivision for the subject property, and finds it meets all requirements and is acceptable. The Engineering Staff has no objections and approves of the proposed resubdivision. X:~FILES\ENGINE E R~C~EV-ENG~°Z~PC~2001U4esselsConsol~App-1 .doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF 'I'HE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PC-19-01 PETITIONER: Hearing Date: March 28, 2002 Susan & Dennis Kessel REQUEST: Plat of resubdivision consolidating six lots creating one lot of record MElVIBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Flores Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson MEIVIBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Susan & Dennis Kessell Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Minutes of the February 28 meeting were approved, with one minor correction. At 7:35, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PC-19-01, a request for Plat Consolidation. She explained that this case would be Village Board final. Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the ca~e. The petitioner is seeking to consolidate six lots creating one lot of record. The subject property is located at 211 West Kensington, west of Elmhurst Road. This plat is part of Mr. Kessel's building permit application. The petitioner is rebuilding part of his home after a recent fire. The consolidation is required to meet Zoning Code requirements, which do not allow a structure to be built over lot lines. Ms. Mas6 said the proposed plat of resubdivision seeks to create one lot of record. The plat and new tot comply with Development Code requirements and the petitioner is not seeking relief from the Development Code or the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Juracek asked for clarification on the number of lots and which lots were being consolidated. Mr. Kessel reported to staffthat his property is currently 5 lots and one half of lnt 3, as shown on the plat. Ms. Mas6 reported that the proposed plat of subdivision is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code requirementS. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Kessel Plat of Resubdivision, for the property located at 211 West Kensington, Mount Prospect Case No. PC-19-01. Ms. Juracek closed the public hearing at 7:40. Richard Rogers moved to approve the requested Plat Consolidation for Case No. PC-19-01, 211 W. Kensington. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Donnelly, Flores, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. lanning & Zoning Commission PC- 19-01 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 At 8:55 p.m., after hearing four more cases, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary VWL 4/~ 0/02 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION 211 WEST KENSINGTON ROAD WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Dennis Kessel, has requested approval of a Final Plat of Consolidation for the purpose of consolidating six lots of record at 211 West Kensington Road into one single lot of record; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the consolidation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the consolidation of six lots into a single lot of record is hereby granted for the property at 211 West Kensington Road and the Final Plat of Consolidation attached to this as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording. Such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Ordinance. SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma Lowe Village Clerk illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 10, 2002 PZ-01-02 - SABINA'S RESUBDIVISION, 1823-1825 WEST EUCLID The Planning and Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-01-02 Sabina's Resubdivision, a request to subdivide two lots to create three lots of record, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request at their March 28, 2002 meeting; The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed plat, found that the plat and proposed easements met Village codes and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the Sabina Resubdivision, Case No. PZ-01~02, 1823- 1825 West Euclid. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their April 16, 2002 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK FROM: SUZANNE MASO, LONG KANGE PLANNER DATE: MARCH 19, 2002 HEARING DATE: MARCH 28, 2002 SUBJECT: PZ-01-02/SABINA RESUBDIVISION/1825 EAST EUCLID AVENUE Background Property Owners: Petitioner: Mr. Drago Zgrabljic Sibcom Development LLC 12320 South Lakeview Huntley, Illinois 60142 Requested Action: Plat of resubdivision subdiving two lots to create three lots of record Analysis The petitioner is seeking to resubdivide two lots and create three lots of record. The subject property is located at the southwest comer of Euclid Avenue and Burning Bush Lane. The property owners are subdiving their lots (lots 1 and 2) to create a new lot (Lot 3) at the south end. Consolidating the subdivided portions of tots 1 and 2 creates Lot 3. The proposed plat of resubdivision seeks to- create three lots of record. Theplat and new lots comply with Development Code requirements and the petitioner is not seeking relief fi.om the Development Code or the Zoning Ordinance. Recommendation The proposed plat of subdivision is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Sabina Plat of Resubdivision, for the property located at 18 25 East Euclid, Mount Prospect Case No. PZ-01-02. Icuncur: V~Hliam J~'C~oney,*AICP Director of Community De~'elopment ount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VILLAGE ENGINEER FEBRUARY 25, 2002 PC-01-02, SABINA'S RESUBDIVISION 1825 E. EUCLID AVE.) The Engineenng Division has reviewed the Plat of Resubdivision for the subject property, and finds it meets all requirements and is acceptable. The Engineering Staff has no objections and approves of the proposed resubdivision. X:\FILES\ENGtN EER~REV- ENG\PZ~2002\$abinas Resub~App-1 ,doc /R,IO, O~OO N MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-01-02 PETITIONER: Hearing Date: March 28, 2002 Drago Zgrabljic Sibcom Development LLC 12320 S. Lakeview Huntley, IL 60142 REQUEST: Plat of resubdivision subdividing two lots to create throe lots of record MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten $oseph Donn¢lly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist Arlene Juracek, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Frances Hanson Lillian Hoffman Moon & Sock Kwan Joan Puzzo Cindy & Michael Young Drago Zgrabljic Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Minutes of the February 28 meeting were approved, with one minor correction. At 7:41, after the Commission heard Case No. PC-19-01, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No, PZ-01-02, a request to subdivide two lots to create three lots of record. She explained that this case would be Village Board final. Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. The petitioner is seeking to resubdivide two lots and create three lots of record. The subject property is located at the southwest comer of Euclid Avenue and Burning Bush Lane. The property owners are subdiving their lots (lots 1 and 2) to create a new lot (Lot 3) at the south end. Consolidating the subdivided portions of lots 1 and 2 creates Lot 3. Ms. Mas6 explained that the proposed plat of resubdivision seeks to create three lots of record. The plat and new lots comply with Development Code requirements and the petitioner is not seeking relief from the Development Code or the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Mas6 reported that the proposed plat of subdivision is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Sabina Plat of Resubdix, ision, for the property located at 1825 East Euclid, Mount Prospect Case No. PZ-01-02. The petitioner, Drago Zgrabljic of 12320 Lakeview, Huntley, Illinois came forward. He explained that is request is similar to a subdivision done'previously at the southeast comer of Euclid and Burning Bush, directly across the street from these properties. He plans to build one single family home on the new property. They are providing sewer and water for these properties for the vacant lot and one existing home. There will only be one new home on lot 3; the newly created lot. lanning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson PZ-01-02 Page 2 Cindy Young, 1903 Ivy Lane came forward. She is an adjacent resident. Ms. Young stated her concerns regarding the properties not selling on the opposite side of Burning Bush and the maintenance of the vacant lot. She is also concerned about future development subdividing the remaining lots on Euclid, which are also as deep as the subject properties, which would require an access road. Ms. Young is concerned about the effect of this development on her neighborhood and the increased population and traffic. She requested that the Commission considered how the new development would change the character of the neighborhood. Lillian Hoffman; 1100 Burning Bush, came forward and expressed her concerns regarding the size of the home. The previous project on east side of Burning Bush included larger homes that she felt did not fit in with the neighborhood. She also expressed concerns about flooding on the lot at 1104 Burning Bush which abuts the new lot 3. Mr. Cotton staff if the subject properties were in a flood plain. Ms. Mas6 stated they were not. Ms. Joan Puzzo, 1907 Ivy Lane, asked the size of the new lot. Ms. Juracek explained that the new lot being created was I00 x 200, a 20,000 square foot lot, and remarked that is still larger than some neighboring lots, and there will only be one new home on the lot. Mr, Rogers clarified that the size of the new lot is about ½ of an acre while the lots on Ivy Lane and others nearby are approximately ¼ of an acre. Mr. Zgrabljic returned to explain that the new home will be approximately 3,200 square feet and will meet all the bulk regulations and zoning requirements. He will only own lot 3; lots 1 and 2 have separate ownership. Mike Leone, 1903 Ivy Lane came forward and expressed his concerns with the size of the new home and how it may block sunlight from the adjacent yards. Ms. Juracek clarified that the commission is only making a recommendation on the lot created by the plat and that no building or construction is being considered. She further explained that if the proposed building did not meet the zoning requirements, the petitioner would then return to the Planning and Zoning with a separate request which would then be the proper forum to address these concerns. Ms. Juraeek closed the public hearing at 8:13. Merrill Cotten moved to approve the request to subdivide two lots to create three lots of record for Case No. PZ-0 t-02. Joseph Donnelly seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Donnelly, Floros, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. At 8:55 p.m., after hearing three more cases, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. ~Planning Secretary uzan~ Mas6fL6ng Range Planner VWL 4/10/02 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION 1823-1825 WEST EUCLID AVENUE WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Drago Zgrabljic, has requested approval of a Final Plat of Resubdivision for the purpose of subdividing two lots to create three lots of record at 1823-1825 West Euclid Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the resubdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the resubdivision of two lots into three lots of record is hereby granted for the property at 1823-1825 West Euclid Avenue and the Final Plat of Resubdivision attached to this as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording. Such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Ordinance. SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Ge~ldL. Fadey Mawr Velma Lowe Village Clerk illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. SANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 12, 2002 PZ-06-02 CONDITIONAL USE (CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY) 805 E. PROSPECT AVENUE The Planning and Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-06-02, a request for a circular driveway, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request at their March 28, 2002 meeting. The subject property is an existing home located in a single-family residential neighborhood on a collector street. Recently, the petitioners constructed a large addition and an attached garage. They would like to construct a circular driveway in order to provide a safe means of entering on to Prospect Avenue and to provide guest parking in front of their house (there are parking restrictions on both sides of Prospect Avenue in front of their property). The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the petitioners' request and noted that the parking restrictions and aesthetic impact distinguish this request from previous circular driveway requests. P&Z members also discussed sight lines, the street width, and the proposed amount of lot coverage. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the request for the Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the property at 805 E. Prospect Avenue, case no. PZ-06-02. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their April 16, 2002 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. Williai~. ~oon*y~, J, AICP Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: MARCH 21, 2002 HEARING DATE: MARCH 28, 2002 SUBJECT: PZ-06-02 - CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A CIRCULAR DRIVE 805 E. PROSPECT AVENUE (BEAU'DRY & JAKUBOWSKI RESIDENCE) BACKGROIYND INFORMATION PETITIONERS: Joni Beaudry & Eric Jakubowski 805 E. Prospect Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 STATUS OF PETITIONER: Property Owners PARCEL NUMBER: 08-12-422-013 LOT SIZE: 18,872 square feet EXISTING ZONING: PA. Single Family Residence EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residence LOT COVERAGE LOT 2: 29% proposed tot coverage 50% lot coverage maximum per RA District REQUESTED ACTION: CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY. BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE The subject property is an interior lot located across the street from the Union Pacific Rail Road tracks, in a single-family residence neighborhood. The property owners recently constructed an addition on the .east side of the house and are in the process of finalizing~that project. As part of the addition project, the petitioners constructed a new attached, garage (they are required to demolish the existing detached garage) and are seeking Conditional Use approval to install a circular driveway. In the attached application, the petitioners state that a circular drive is necessary for aesthetic and safety reasons: Prospect Avenue is wide and drivers have a tendency to speed on this street. In addition, parking restrictions on this section of Prospect Avenue make it inconvenient for guest parking (there is no parking on either side of Prospect Avenue from Mount Prospect Road to Edward Street). While some drivers disregard the parking PZ-06-02 Meeting of March 28, 2002 Page 2 restrictions and park on the street, the petitioner states an unsafe situation is created because sight lines are obstructed. The petitioners state that vehicles will not be parked on the circular portion of the driveway overnight. In addition, they propose to construct the circular drive of decorative materials and retain as many of the existing trees as possible. They state that the decorative materials and landscaping will minimize the impact of the circular drive on the neighborhood. To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioners' plat of survey, site plan, and visited the site. REQUIRED FINDINGS Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use~ (The circular drive is listed as a.Conditional Use in the parking section of the Zoning Ordinance (Sec. 14.2215.A. 1). These standards relate to: · The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicin, ity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize cr;ngestion on Village streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The subject property for the proposed Conditional Use is an 18,872 square foot parcel. The applicant proposes to construct a circular driveway in the fi'ont yard. As with other requests for a circular drive, staff evaluated traffic patterns in the neighborhood. In this ease, the Village restricts parking on the south side of Prospect Avenue from Maple to Edward Street (two-hour parking) and prohibits parking on the north and south sides of Prospect Avenue from Edward to Mount Prospect Road. The petitioners' front yard has 140-linear feet frontage onto Prospect Avenue. The minimum tot width in the RA zoning district is 50-feet. The petitioners lot is almost three times bigger than the minimal width and the circular portion of the driveway would cover 15% of the front yard (30'x140'). This amount of front yard lot coverage is in keeping with the Village's policy of open, 'green'.front-yards. Prospect Avenue is designated as a collector street from Central Road to Mount Prospect Road and, therefore, is designed to handle greater traffic than a local road. This, coupled with exist:lng parking restrictions, justifies granting the Conditional Use request. The additional driveway and amount of front yard coverage would be in keeping with the Village's policy of maintaining a "green" front yard. The circular driveway would not have a negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The essential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare. Z-06-02 Meeting of March 28, 2002 Page 3 P,3ECOMMENDATION The proposed circular driveway meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the residence at 805 E. Prospect Avenue, Case No. PZ-06-02. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William J Cooney, AICP, D~rector of Commumty Development 505 502 507 .504 509 506 5tl 508 513 510 515 512 517 514 Council Trail PZ-'06-02 805 E. Prospect Avenue Request for a Circular Driveway VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNrrY DEWLO?M~I, rr Dt~?m~IlvmNI 2 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval Address(es) (Street Numbs, Street) Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Setbacks: Front R~ar Side Side '%0 I0" Building Height Lot Coverage (%) N .u~ber of Parking.Spaces Adjacent Land Uses: North I South East West Tax I.D, Number or County Assigned Pin Numbers) l.~gal Description (atlach additional sheets if necessary) Nan~ Telephone (day) Corporation Telephone (evening) Street Address Fax City,~ Y' State Zip Co& ?ager Interest in Property q'ame Telephone (day) Corporation " Telephone (evening) Street Address Fax: City State Zip Code Pager Developer ! Telephone (day) Address ! Fax Attorney Name ~,~ O I~ -~" Telephone (day) Address Fax Surveyor ~ame Telephone (day) Address Fax Archltect L~ndsc~pe Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South lq. merson Street, Mount Prospect lll/nois www.mountprospect, org 2 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 roposed Conditional Use (as listed in the zoning district) Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Atiached Standards for Conditional Use Approval (at'ach additional shee~s il%ecessary) Hours of Operation Addsess(es) (Street l~l. mher, Street) Site Area (Acres) Propen'y Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Pt. Devoted to Proposed Use Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the pls~mlng Division Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appdinlment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be ~iven to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property l~rant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby afl.urn that all information provided here/n and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.. If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to aet as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Vasiation(s) described in this application and the associated suppot'llng material. Mount Prospect Department of Community Dc~p~nt 100 South Emerson S~et, Mount Prospect ll~inois www.moun~prospect.org ' 3 Date Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.8t8.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Detail of Proposed Use ZBA Application for 805 East Prospect Avenue, Mount Prospect, IL Febmary 22,2002 805 East Prospect is an existing single-family residence on an approximately ½ acre lot. The original building is a 1929 brick 2-story bungalow. Applicants are in the process of completing in spring, 2002 an addition and renovation project that will add an attached 2- car garage and 1200 s.f. of new living space. Applicants submit for approval a plan to incorporate a new driveway that includes a circular design with 2 aprons accessing Prospect Avenue. The attached drawing prepared by Tinaglia Architects details the specific layout and design. The subject property is the only residential single-family lot with frontage on Prospect Avenue for more than ~ mile in either direction. This is one of the original farmsteads of Mount Prospect. Lot frontage on Prospect Avenue is 140 feet. Applicants desire to include a circular driveway for both aesthetic and safety reasons. Prospect Avenue is an unusually wide 2 lane street: traffic volumes are heavier than a normal Village residential street, and vehicle speeds tend to average above the posted 30 mph speed limit. Any vehicle backing out of the tot at 805 East Prospect is further hazarded bythe fact that Prospect Avenue is an angle street and sight lines for drivers are more e~reme than at a 90 degree perpendicular driveway. Prospect Avenue between Edward and George Streets, immediately west and east of subject lot, is a posted "No Parking" zone. Visitors to this residence are exposed to the option of parking illegally, or going around the comer to park on one of the cross streets - a hazard or inconvenience. Applicants propose a circular driveway with an apron in front of the 2-car garage. Applicants and visitors will use the circular driveway-for short-term parking and safe ingress/egress. No overnight parking on the circular portion of the driveway is anticipated - vehicles will be kept in the garage or on the apron in front of the garage. The addition of the cimular driveway will enable the applicants and visitors to use the original main entrance of the house in the northwest comer of the structure. Applicants will construct the driveway and walks of decorative course concrete together with a perimeter of brick pavers. Applicants desire to maintainthe existing mature trees in the front lot. The only exception is the removal of 2 evergreen trees, which are leaning due to lopsided priming of main branches. Landscaping wilt be incorporated to maximize a green and open'space in conformance with Village guidelines. CASE NO. PZ-06-02 PETITIONER: MINUTES OF THE REGUL~ MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONINGX~O~MMISSION Hearing Date: March 28, 2002 Joni Beaudry & Eric Jakubowski, Property Owners REQUEST: Conditional Use to allow a circular drive 805 E. Prospect MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngqulst Arlene Juracek, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Donald Bender Thomas Manion Eric Jakubowski Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Minutes of the February 28 meeting were approved, with one minor correction. At 8:15, after the Commission heard two other cases, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-06-02, a request for a Conditional Use to allow construction of a circular driveway. She explained that this ease would be Village Board final. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. The subject property is an interior lot located across the street from the Union Pacific Rall Road tracks, in a single-family residence neighborhood. The property owners recently constructed an addition on the east side of the house. As part of the addition project, the petitioners constructed a new attached garage and are seeking Conditional Use approval to install a circular driveway. Ms. Connolly pointed out that,'in their application, the petitioners state that a circular drive is necessary for several rcasons, one of which is that Prospect Avenue is 4-1nnes and drivers have a tendency to speed on this street. In addition, the parking restrictions on this section of Prospect Avenue make it inconvenient for guest parking (there is no parking on either side of Prospect Avenue from Mount Prospect Road to Edward Street). Some drivers disregard the parking restrictions and park on the street, which the petitioner states is an unsafe situation because sight lines are obstructed. Ms. Connolly reported that the petitioners state that vehicles will not be parked on the circular portion of the driveway overnight. In addition, they propose to construct the circular drive of decorative materials and retain as many of the existing trees as possible. They state that the decorative materials and landscaping will minimize the impact of the circular drive on the neighborhood. Ms. Connolly said, in order to approve the request, the Board has to find that it meets the standards for a Conditional Use, which are listed in the Zoning Ordinance. To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, Planning staff reviewed the petitioners' plat of survey, site plan, visited the site, and worked with the Village's Traffic Engineer. Ms. Connolly described the subject prope~r for the proposed Conditional Use as an 18,872 square foot parcel. The applicant proposes to construct a circular driveway in the front yard. As with other requests for a circutar drive, staff evaluated traffic patterns in the neighborhood. In this case, the Village restricts parking on the south side of Prospect Avenue from Maple to Edward Street (two-hour parking) and prohibits parking on the north and south sides of Prospect Avenue from Edward to Mount Prospect Road. lanning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson PZ-06-02 Page 2 Ms. Connolly said the petitioners' front yard has 140-1inear feet frontage onto Prospect Avenue. The minimum lot width in the RA zoning district is 50-feet. The petitioners lot is almost three times bigger than the minimal width and the circular portion of the driveway would cover 15% of the front yard (30'x140'). This amount of front yard lot coverage is in keeping with the Village's policy of open, 'green' front-yards. Ms. Connolly reported that Prospect Avenue is designated as a collector street from Central Road to Mount Prospect Road and, therefore, is designed to handle greater traffic than a local road. This, coupled with existing parking restrictions, justifies granting the Conditional Use request. Ms. Connolly said the additional driveway and amount of front yard coverage would be in keeping with the Village's policy of maintaining a "green" front yard. The circular driveway would not have a negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The essential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare. Based on these findings, Staffreeommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the residence at 805 E. Prospect Avenue, Case No. PZ-06-02. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. The petitioner, Erie Jakubowski, 805 E. Prospect Ave., was sworn in. He said Ms. Connolly had presented his case very well and he would be pleased to answer any questions the Commissioners may have. Richard Rogers asked how large the home was with the recent addition and complimented him on doing a very nice job on the house. Mr. Jakubowski thanked him and said the house was originally 3,000 s.f. and was now 4,400 s.f. He said it was originally a farmhouse and he tried to keep the original character of the home. He said the driveway he wanted to replace was the original rural cinder type. Mr. Rogers advised him on careful excavating in order to retain the trees. Leo Floros said he considered this the most unique building project in Mount Prospect in many years. Mr. Jakubowski said the design of the 1929 home had taken six months. He also pointed out it is the only single family hOme to front on Prospect Avenue. Don Bender, 507 South George, was sworn in and said this .project was enhancing the neighborhood. He said he had talked to the neighbors and they all liked the idea cfa circular drive to prevent parking cars on Prospect Avenue. Ms. Juracek closed the public hearing at 8:31. Leo Floros moved to recommend approval of the request for a circular drive for Case No: PZi06-02. Richard Rogers seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Donnelly, Floros, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist arid Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. At 8:55 p.m., after hearing two more cases, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meetingwas adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary ,/ 4/10/02 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 805 EAST PROSPECT AVENUE WHEREAS, Joni Beaudry and Eric Jakubowski (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 805 East Prospect Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 22 in Surety's Bonnie Park, a subdivision of Lot 2 in Oehlerking's Division of part of Sec. 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 Eats of the 3rd Principal Meridian, in the Village of Mount Prospect, according to the plat thereof registered in the office of Registrar of Titles of Cook County, IL on May 11, 1956 as Doc# 1669522, in Cook County, IL. Property index Number: 08-12-422-013-000 and WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Conditional Use permit to construct a circular driveway; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit, being the subject of PZ Case No. 06-02, before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of March, 2002, pursuant to pr,o~er legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13 day of March, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and positive recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ 06-02; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 12, 2002 PZ-07-02 / CONDITIONAL USE (ITINERANT VETERINARY CLINIC) 1018 MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA - PETCO STORE APPLICANT: LUV MY PET The Planning and Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-07-02, a request for an itinerant veterinary clinic, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request at their March 28, 2002 meeting. The proposed clinic would be located inside the existing Petco Store and operate two Sundays a month, for two hours each Sunday. Licensed vets employed by Luv My Pet would run the clinic, and they would administer vaccines and take samples for routine lab tests. The petitioner was granted Conditional Use approval for this request in 1998, but for a different Petco Store location. The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the store conditions and the scope of services offered at the clinic. They asked the petitioner questions about the previous Mount Prospect clinic operation and clarified that the petitioner would have to amend the Conditional Use if she wanted to increase the number of days or hours of operation. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the request for the Conditional Use for an itinerant veterinary clinic for the property at 1018 Mount Prospect Plaza, case no. PZ-07- 02 subject to the petitioner complying with the conditions listed in the staffreport. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their April 16, 2002 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter. · ' J./Cooney, Jr., AICP Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: MARCH 21, 2002 HEARING DATE: MARCH 28, 2002 SUBJECT: PZ-07-02 - CONDITIONAL USE FOR A VETERINARY CLINIC 1018 MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA (INSIDE PETCO - MP PLAZA SHOPPING CTR.) BACKGROUND INFORMATION PETITIONER: Lynda Ernst Luv My Pet 2510 E. Dempster Street #106 Des Plaines, IL 60016 STATUS OF PETITIONER: Agent for Luv My Pet, Lessee of a portion of the Petco Store STORE SIZE: 14,504 square feet EXISTING ZONING: B3 Community commercial EXIST-ING LAND USE: Shopping Center REQUESTED ACTION: CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE OPERATION OF A VETERINARY CLINIC BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE The subject property is a shopping center located in the B3 Community Shopping zoning district. The shopping center has undergone significant remodeling and the former banquet hall was converted to a Petco Store. The petitioner, who represents, Luv My Pet, is seeking Conditional Use approval to operate an itinerant veterinary clinic inside the Petco Store. The petitioner, Lynda Ernst, appeared before the Zoning Board in 1998 with the same request, but for a Petco Store located at Golf and Route 83 (that store has since closed). Similar '~o the 1998 ease, the proposed vet clinic would operate on alternating Sunday aiternoons for two hours each Sunday. In the attached application, the petitioner states that the scope of services would be limited to vaccinations for dogs, cats, and ferrets and taking samples for routine lab tests, i.e. blood samples. The work would be done by licensed vets, who work for Luv My Pet and would recommend any appropriate full vet services as indicated necessary by their exam. The attached Petco Store floor plan shows the location of the vet clinic. A total of four 2'x4' tables would be used: one table for the Customer Service Representative, one for a cashier, and two tables placed together to create a 2'x8' exam table. The locations of the tables comply with ADA requirements for accessibility (36' aisle clearance). PZ-07-02 Meeting of March 28, 2002 Page 2 To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's application, previous zoning case file, and visited the Petco Store. REQUIRED FINDINGS Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. (The circular drive is listed as a Conditional Use in the parking section of the Zoning Ordinance (Sec. 14.2215.A.1). These standards relate to: · The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. Approval Process The subject site is zoned B3 Community Shopping. "Animal Hospitals" are listed as Conditional Uses in the B3 district. The proposed Luv My Pet facility falls under the definition of Animal Hospital given in the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, the proposal requires approval of a Conditional Use by the Village Board, following a public hearing and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses North: R5 Senior Citizen Residence - Centennial Apartments South: B3 Community Shopping - deli, new retail shopping center, tile store East: R1 Single Family Residence (across Westgate Road) West: B3 Community Shopping - Walmart Site, Structure, and Elevations The proposed use would be located in an existing structure (new Petco Store) and no alterations to the structure or site are proposed. Comprehensive Plan The property is identified as Community-Commercial in the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is listed as a Conditional Use in the B3 zoning district. The site is currently used as a retail center and the proposed use will not significantly impact the intensity of the center with respect to traffic volume or noise since the vet clinic's oustomer base would most likely shop at the Petco Store in the first place and get the vaccinations as they do their shopping. Therefore, the proposed Conditional Use is appropriate for the site. RECOMMENDATION The proposed veterinary clinic is located in an existing shopping center and operates on a limited sehedule~ The use will have limited impact on the adjacent neighborhoods or other tenants in the shopping center. The site will comply with the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use to operate a veterinary clinic at 1018 Mount Prospect Plaza at the Z~07-02 Meeting of March 28, 2002 Page 3 Petco Store, Case No. PZ-07-02 with the conditions listed below. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. 1. The scope of services will be limited to administering vaccinations and taking samples (blood, etc.) for routine tests only; 2. Animals will not be boarded on-site; 3. Veterinary services will be provided no more than two (2) days per month, up to two hours; 4. All activity will be conducted inside the store; 5. Treatment tables and cashier tables will be situated to maintain a minimum 36" wide passage in all aisles, as required by the American with Disabilities Act. I concur: W!l~m J~'~o¢ r ey,~ ~ ~)zrector of Commumty Development OIOI ~ $00I ~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect. Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329, ~ Application for Conditional Use Approval Case Number P&Z Developxnent Name/Address Date of Snbmission Hearing Date Address(es) (Street Number. Street) ~te .~ea (Acres) Property Zohing Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Setbacks: Front Rear Side Building Hcighl Lot Coverage (%) Number of Park~g Spa~s Adjacent Land U~s: North ~uth East West TaX LD. Number or County ~4gncd Pill NUmber(s) [.cgal D~ription (attach additional sh~ts ~' ,9/~,¢/£~.d~posed Conditional 5se (as listed in the zoning district) I)~eribe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed USe Meets the Attached Standards for Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets ifnecessaD9 ,~urs of Operation Address(es) (Street Number. Street) Site Area (Acres) } Properl3.' Zoning Tota! Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Devoted t° Proposed Use Setbacks: Front Rear Side Side Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Par 'king Spaens Plca~ note that thc application will not be reviewed until-this petition has been fi:lb' completed and alt required Plans and other materials have been satisl~etorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly .~mggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff.so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the tinge of snbmiltal. In consideration of the infi:rmalion contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, il is requested that approval be given to this reqnes't. 'll~e applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the properly.. The petitioner and the owner of the propem.. grant employe~.'s of the Village of Mounl Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours fi:r visual htspcction of the subject property. I bereby affLrm that all infom~ation provided herein and in all materials submitted in asSOCiation with this application are true and accurate to the b~.~t of tn,,' knowledge. Il' applicant Is not properly I hereby designate the applic,'mt to 5ct as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner Date Mouut Prospcct Department of Conm~anit3.' Development Phone 847.818.5328 100 South Emerson Street. Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TI-W, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-07-02 PETITIONER: Hearing Date: March 28, 2002 Lynda Ernst, agent for Luv My Pet REQUEST: Conditional Use for the operation of an itinerant veterinary clinic MEMBERS PRESENT: Men'ill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Cormolly, AICP, Senior Planner Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Lynda Ernst Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Minutes of the February 28 meeting were approved, with one minor correction. At 8:33, after the Commission heard three other cases, Ms. Jumcek introduced Case No. PZ-07-02, a request for a Conditional Use to operate an itinerant veterinary clinic. She explained that this case would be Village Board final. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. She said that the subject property is a shopping center located in the B3 Community Shopping zoning district, in the Mount Prospect Plaza Shopping Center. The petitioner, who represents Luv My Pet, is seeking Conditional Use approval to operate an itinerant veterinary clinic inside the newly opened Petco Store. Ms. Connolly reported that the petitioner appeared before the Zoning Board four years ago with the same request, but for a different Peteo Store, which has since closed; Similar to the previous case, the clinic would operate on alternating Sunday afternoons for two hours each Sunday. Ms. Connolly said that the scope of services would be limited to vaccinations for dogs, cats, and ferrets and taking samples for routine lab tests. Licensed vets, who work for Luv My Pet, would do the work. Also, they would recommend any appropriate full vet services as indicated necessary by their exam. Ms. Connolly pointed out that the floor plan included in each Commissioner's packet shows that the vet clinic would be located in the rear of the store and would consist of four 2'x4' tables - one table for the Customer Service Representative, who would greet or check-in the customer, one table for the cashier, and two tables placed together to create a 2'x8' exam table. She said that the locations of the tables comply with ADA requirements for accessibility. Ms. Connolly said the subject site is zoned B3 Community Shopping. "Animal Hospitals" are listed as Conditional Uses in the B3 district. The proposed Luv My Pet facility falls under the definition of Animal Hospital given in the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, the proposal requires approval cfa Conditional Use by the Village Board, following a public hearing and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In order to approve the request, the Board has to find that the Conditional Use meets the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed use would be located in an existing structure (new Petco Store) and no alterations to the structure or site are proposed. The site is currently used as a retail center and the proposed use will not significantly impact the intensity of the center with respect to traffic volume or noise since the vet clinic's customer base would most likely shop at the Petco Store in the first place and get the vaccinations as they do their shopping. lanning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-07-02 Page 2 Ms. Connolly summarized the case and.stated that the veterinary clinic is located in an existing shopping center and operates on a limited schedule. The use will have limited impact on the adjacent neighborhoods or other tenants in the shopping center. The site will comply with the Conditional Use standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staffrecommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use to operate a veterinary clinic at the Petco Store in the Mount Prospect Plaza, Case No. PZ~07-02, with the following conditions: 1. The scope of services will be limited to administering vaccinations and taking samples (blood, etc.) for routine tests only; 2. Animals will not be boarded on-site; 3. Veterinary services will be provided no more than two (2) days per month, up to two hours; 4. All activity will be conducted inside the store; 5. Treatment tables and cashier tables will be situated to maintain a minimum 36" wide passage in all aisles, as required by the American with Disabilities Act. Arlene Juracek asked if the vet clinic would be limited to two weekends per month regardless of the calendar. Ms. Connolly said yes. Lynda Ernst was sworn in and testified that this Pete0 Store is much larger than the previous Mount Prospect Peteo store they had been located in. Ms. Juracek asked how many clients they served at the old location. Ms. Ernst said 15, every other weekend. Ms. Ernst pointed out that the other store was never able to build up their business because the Rte. 83 construction began as soon as they opened in May of 1998. She said that they are located in 25 stores in Illinois and Indiana and many stores handle 80 pets every two weeks. She also said they do not take appointments. Ms. Jurg. cek reminded the petitioner that if they deCided t° be at the location more than two days or mOre than 2 hours per day they would need to come before the Board again. The petitioner said that she understood this requirement. Ms. Juracek closed the public hearing at 8:42. Richard Rogers moved to recommend approval of the request for a Conditional Use to operate an itinerant veterinary clinic for Case No. PZ-07-02. Leo Floros seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Donnelly, Floros, ROgers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. At 8....'55 p.m., after hearing another case, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. ,.~,T~[ motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary VWL ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1018 MOUNT PROSPECT P~ WHEREAS, Lynda Ernst/Luv My Pet (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Conditional Use with respect to propertylocated at 1018 MOUnt ProSpect Plaza, (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows: Part of Lot 1, Plaza Subdivision, City of MP, Cook County, IL described as: Beginning at the NWC of the West Gate Rd & E. Central Rd; thence N89°37'28"W, 813.32'; thence N56°54'28"W, 419.4t'; thence N33°05'32"E, 35'; thence N56°54'28"W, 120'; S33°05'32"W, 35'; thence N56°54'28"W, 38.52'; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 2,072.46' & a long cord sUbtended bearing of N53°26'08"Wi 252.15'; thence N20°57'12"E, 6t5.3'; thence S89°37'28"E, 698.3'; thence N0°I '21"E, 123.99'; thence N89°39'43"E, 416.97'; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 40' & a long cord subtended beadng of S78°43'34"E, 16.11'; thence S67°05'57"E, 135.16'; thence S89°26'43"E, 24.37'; thence S0°0'0"W, 1,111.59' to the point of beginning· Contained within said bounds 1,404,186.72 sq. ft. or 32.24 acres. Property Index Numbe~. 03-35-301-036-000 and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to operate an itinerant veterinary clinic twice monthly; and WHEREAS, a Public Headng was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit being the subject of PZ Case No. 07-02, before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28~ day of March, 2002, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13th day of March, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning commission has submitted ils findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ 07-02; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use, as provided in Section 14.203.F of the Village Code, to allow the operation of an itinerant veterinary clinic twice monthly, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit PZ 07-02 Page 2/2 SECTION THREE: That this Conditional Use permit shall be subject to and conditioned upon the following restrictions: 1. The scope of se~ices will be limited to administering vaccinations and taking samples (blood, etc.) for routine tests only; 2. Animals will not be boarded on-site; 3. Veterinary se~ices will be provided no more than two (2) days (Sundays) per month, up to two hours; 4. All activity will be conducted inside the store; 5. Treatment tables and cashier tables will be situated to maintain a minimum 36" wide passage in all aisles, as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act. SECTION FOUR: That any violation of the aforesaid restrictions shall make the Conditional Use permit subject to immediate expiration and revocation. .SECTION FIVE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day ~ ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Fadey Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 12, 2002 PZ-08-02 / CONDITIONAL USE (LIMITED AUTO SALES) 620 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY - NORTHWEST AUTO REPAIR APPLICANT: CHARLES RANDOLPH The Planning and Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-08-02, a request to amend Ordinance 5153 that granted Conditional Use approval for an auto repair shop in the B5 zoning district. The petitioner would like to amend that ordinance to include the sale of up to four vehicles, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request at their March 28, 2002 meeting. The subject property is located at the comer of Northwest Highway and William Street. The existing auto repair business and property would not be modified to accommodate the petitioner's request for limited auto sales~ The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the petitioner's request and noted that the maximum number of vehicles the petitioner would sell at one time would be limited to four vehicles. The petitioner stated that selling more than four vehicles would detract from the repair business and agreed to limited advertising as noted in the staff report. The P&Z discussed the fact that the petitioner has improved the property and that installing landscaping would minimize the impact of auto sales as an accessory use. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the request to amend Ordinance 5153 to include limited auto sales as part of the Conditional Use for the property at 620 E. Northwest Highway, case no. PZ-08-02. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their April 16, 2002 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: MARCH 21, 2002 HEARING DATE: MARCH 28, 2002 SUBJECT: PZ-08-02 - CONDITIONAL USE (AMEND ORD.# 5153 TO ALLOW AUTO SALES) 620 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY (NORTHWEST AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR) BACKGROUND INFORMA rION Petitioner: Charles Randolph 620 E. Northwest Highway Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Status of Petitioners: Tenant Lot Size: .40 acres Existing Zoning: B5 Central Commercial Existing Laud Use: Auto Repair Requested Aclions: Amend Ordinance # 5153 to include auto sales as an accessory use. BACKGROUND The subject property is at the northeast comer of Northwest Highway and William SWeet, adjacent to single family residential, commercial, and across the slxeet fxom the UPRR tracks. The Village granted a Conditional Use permit for an auto repair shop in November 2000. The petitioner would like to modify the Conditional Use to include auto sales as an accessory use as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The site and building would not be modified to accommodate the proposed auto sales. To conduct its analysis of the proposed modification of the Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, the site plan, parking requirements, and visited the site. ANALYSIS Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses North: RA Single Family Residence South: I2 Railroad / Raikoad right-of-way and raikoad tracks East: B5 Central Commercial / vacant building West: B5 Central Commercial / Medical Office PZ-08-02 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting March 28, 2002 Page 2 Approval Process The subject site is in the B5 Central Commercial District. "Accessory uses and buildings, incidental to and on the same zoning lot as the conditional use" is listed as a Conditional Use in the B5 district. The proposed auto sales will require modifying the existing Conditional Use approval granted in November 2000 by the Village Board. This requires a public heating and recommendation by the Planning & Zoning Commission and Village Board approval of the request. Comprehensive Plan Designation The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property for general commercial and office uses. The petitioner would continue to operate the auto repair shop as the primary use and the vehicle sales, which would be limited to four vehicles, would lie an accessory use. The site was a used ear dealership previous to its current use. Structure and Elevations The petitioner does not plan to modify the existing structure. The vehicle sales would be displayed in the parking lot. Landscape Plan As part of the previous Conditional Use approval, the applicant was required to install foundation landscaping and additional perimeter landscaping. The petitioner is in the process of implementing this requirement and anticipates completing all work this spring. Parking and Stacking Section 14.2224.1 lists parldng requirements for the B5 Central Commercial District. Per these requirements, the auto repair use is ~lulred to have seven parking spaces. The petitioner states in the attached apphcation that the maximum number of vehicles that would be sold at one lime would be four. Therefore, the site requires 11 parking spaces. Currently, there are 13 standard parking spaces and one bandicap parking space on-site. The amount of parking provided exceeds code requirements. As noted in the.previous Conditional Use request, customer and employee parking would be limited to the subject property only. REQUIRED -FINDINGS Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of thc Village Zon'mg Ordinance. The section contains seven specific fmdings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: · The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Usc with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is an auto repair shop along a commercial corridor. Prior to becoming an auto repair shop, the site was a used ear lot. The proposal is ora similar intensity to the surrounding commercial area. Installing the landscaping to provide an enhanced buffer for the residences should allow little or no negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets in the area. The proposed modification Z-08-02 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting March 28, 2002 Page 3 to the Conditional Use will__comply with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Therefore, the request would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. RECOMMENDATION The proposed modification to the existing Conditional Use will meet the required standards listed in the Z°nifig Ordinance, when the conditions of approval, listed below, have been met. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the proposed Conditional Use to include auto sales at 620 E. Northwest Highway, Case No. PZ-08-02. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. The conditions of approval are: re u 1. Implementation of the landscape plan as q ired by Ordinance ~ no later than May 1, 2002 or the petitioner shall establish an escrow account equal to the amount of the required work to ensure the work is done; No more than four vehicles shall be sold at one time; No signage related to auto sales will be permitted other than an indication on/in the windshield of the vehicle being sold; 4. All conditions of approval listed in Ordinance 54~Y2 continue to be applicable. I concur: ~iili~k"'am-~.' Co oney~, ~p, Director o f Community Development 201 200 203-205 202 207-209 206 211-213 208 210 215-217 212 219-221 214 223-225 216 218 220 Evergreen Avenue 201 200 203 202 205 204 207 206 209 208 211 210 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 201 200 203 202 205 204 207 206 209 208 211 210 213 212 215 214 217 216 219 218 220 221 222 Milburn Avenue 201 203 205 207 209 211 213 215 217 219 221 223 301 303 305 307 309 311 313 315 317 PZ-08-02 Northwest Automotive Repair Center 620 E. Northwest Highway Amend Ordinance 5153 to include limited auto sales ORDINANCE NO. 5153 AN ORDINANCE. GRANTING A CONDITIONAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 620 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY Passed and approved by the President and Board.of Trustees the 8th day of November, 2000 Published in pamphlet form by authority Of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, the 9th day of.November, 2000 ~ANL 11,2/00 ORDINANCE NO. 5153 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A COND TONAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 620 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY WHEREAS, George Zervos (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has fi ed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 620 Bast Northwest Highway (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows: Lots 53 through 58, (except 3 feet and 1 3& inches take evenly off the Easterly side of said Lot 58) in MomingSide Gardens, a subdivision of part of'the Northeast ~ of Section 12, Township 41 .North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook CoUnty Illinois; Property Index Numben 08-12-222-026 and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit for the operation of an auto repair business' in the B-5 Central Coromercial zoning district; and WHEREAS,.a Public Hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use being.the subject of ZBA Case No. 39-2000 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26n day of October, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having ~been published in the Mount'Prospect Journal & Topics on the 11a day of October, 2000; and · WHEREAS, the Zoning. Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and ~'ecemroendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 39-2000; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of' Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request heroin and have determined that the saroe meets the standards of the Village and that.the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: .SECTION ONE:. The recitals set forth heminabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the 'President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount prospect. SECTION TWO; The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount 'Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use' permit, as provided for in Sedtlon 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code, to alloW the operation Of an auto repair business in the B-5 Central Commercial zoning district,-as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of Which is attached hereto and hereby roade a'part hereof as Exhibit "A.' Page 2/2 620 E. Northwest Hwy. SECTION THREE:_ Pdor to the issuance of a building permit'relative to the COnditional Use permit, the following conditions and/or written documentation shall .be fulfilled:. 1..Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Place Associates dated November 1, 2000. · 2. Submission of a final landscape plan in general conformance with the preliminary site plan prepared by Place Associates, dated November 1, 2000: a. revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning O~'dinance; b. revised to provide evergreen bushes at a 3' in height along 100 percent of the Northwest Highway frontage and along 50 percent of the east property line; evergreen or similar year-round type landscaping clustered along the rear property line; and planter boxes with evergreen type plantings with annuals planted in the spring/summer months.. 3: The petitioner shall not park any employee or customer vehicles on the surrounding public streets. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements for newly paved areas. 5. submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Hours of operation are confined to 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. 7. No overnight stacking of vehicles. SECTION FOUR:. The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook COunty. .SECTION FIVE..' This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its . passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in {he manner provided' by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, .Wilks None Corcoren PASSED and APPROVED this 8~ day of November, 2000. '-'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT- Planning Division 100 S. Emerson Sm:et Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.$328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval Address(es) (Street Number, Street) Site Area., t. (Sit~) ;Height ~f Parking Spaces Adjacent Land East West , Number or Count. roposed Conditional Uso (as listed in the zoning district) Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use MeeB t~e Attached S~andar& for Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary) "FO Ho~s of O~mtion ~ ~ ....... Ad,ese(es) (S~et Numbeh S~eet) . Site ~ ~r~a [Acras) ~ope~m~ Total B~kding Sq. F~. (Sit*) /~ '~ ~[ Sq. FL Devoted t° Propo~ed~~e,, ~~ ~.(~. ~ Setbacks:' ' ' Z / t , , Pica.se note that the application will not be r~viewed until this petidon h,~ been fully completed and all required plans and other mat~aIs have been satisfactorily submitted m the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule a~ appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials ca~ be r~viewed for accuracy and c°mpleteness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the in/'ormation contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested tha~ approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of.the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant amployees of'the Village of Moant Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided h~ and in all materials submitted in association with this application are ~rue and accurate to the best of~y knowle_dge..,.---~// If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. ~/J~ ~ O~ ProperVff Owner ~ Date ~ /vlount Prospect Depertment of Corem i'od Devel°prae~t Phone 847.81 g.f32g Fax 847.818.5329 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois 3 TDD 8~7.392.6064 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-08-02 PETITIONER: REQUEST: Hearing Date: March 28, 2002 Charles Randolph, Tenant Conditional Use to amend Ordinance #5153 t° include auto sales as an accessory use MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Kcith Youngquist Arlene Juracck, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Richard Lanze Charles Randolph Chairperson Arlene Suracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Minutes of the February 28 meeting were approved, with one minor correction. At 8:43, after the Commission heard four other cases, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-08-02, a request for a Conditional Use to allow auto sales at an auto repair shop. She explained that this case would be Village Board final. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, began by explaining that the Village granted a Conditional Use permit for an auto repair shop at 620 E. Northwest Highway in November 2000 and that the petitioner would like to modify the Conditional Use to include auto sales as an accessory use. She said that the subject site is in the B5 Central Commercial District. "Accessory uses and buildings, incidental to and on the same zoning lot as the conditional use" is listed as a Conditional Use in the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed auto sales will require modifying the existing Conditional Use approval granted in November 2000. Ms. Connolly said that this requires a public hearing, a recommendation by the Planning & Zoning Commission, and Village Board approval of the request. Ms. Connolly said staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, the site plan, parking requirements, and visited the site. The site was a used ear dealership previous to its current use. The petitioner would continue to operate the auto repair shop as the primary use and the vehicle sales, which would be limited to four vehicles, would be an accessory use. She said that this use would be consistent with the Village's Comprehensive Plan designation. The petitioner · does not plan to modify the existing structure and the vehicle sales would be displayed in the parking lot. According to the Zoning Ordinance, the auto repair use is required to have seven parking spaces and the auto sales would be limited to four vehicles. Therefore, the site requires 11 parking spaces. Currently, there are 13 standard parking spaces and one handicap parking space un-site. The amount of parking provided exceeds code requirements. Ms. Connolly reported that, as part of the previous Conditional Use approval, the applicant was required to install foUndation landscaping and additional perimeter landscaping. The petitioner is in the process of implementing this requirement and anticipates completing all work this spring. Ms. Connolly described the s~bject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use as an auto repair shop along a commercial corridor. Prior to becoming an auto repair shop, the site was a used car lot~ The proposal is of a similar intensity to the surrounding commercial area. Installing the landscaping to provide an enhanced buffer for the residences should allow little or no negative impact. The proposed modificati°n to the Conditional Use will comply with the Comprehensive lanning & Zoning Ctommission PZ-08-02 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Therefore, the request would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. Ms. Connolly said that, based on these findings and when the conditions of approval are met, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the proposed Conditional Use to include auto sales at 620 E. Northwest Highway, Case No. PZ-08-02. The conditions of approval are: 1. Implementation of the landscape plan as required by Ordinance 5153 no later than May 1, 2002 or the petitioner shall establish an escrow account equal to the amount of the required work to ensure the work is done; 2. No more than four vehicles shall be sold at one time; 3. No signage related to auto sales will be permitted other than an indication on/in the windshield of the vehicle being sold; 4. All conditions of approval listed in Ordinance 5153 continue to be applicable. Richard Rogers commented that he had been observing the business since their last case and said it was well maintained and did not use flags or excess signs, and had a neat appearance. Joseph Dounelly asked about the storage of the cars at night. Ms. Cormolly said they would be in a parking stall outside overnight. Merrill Cotten asked about the stacking of the vehicles and if thc inventory would go beyond four vehicles. Charles Randolph, the petitioner, was sworn in. He said that he lives in Des Plaines, rents the auto repair property, and owns the business. He said that there would not be more than four cars for sale at one time and there would be no signs, flags, or ramps. Keith Youngquist also commented on the improvement oftbe appearance of the business in comparison to the former business at that location. Mr. Randolph said he appreciated that comment and said that he also had heard the previous business, which had been only auto sales, had not been well maintained. He said that he only sells cars that he purchases and repairs from customers who do not want to invest in repairs to the auto. He said that he requested the amendment to the Conditional Use became he was approached by the Secretary of State Police regarding the occasional sales and he wanted to be sure the sale of automobiles was legal. Ms. Juracek closed the public hearing at 8:54. Richard Rogers moved to recommend that Ordinance 5153 be amended to allow auto sales as an accessory use for Case No, PZ-08-02 with the conditions listed in'the §~aff report. Joseph Dormelly seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: Motion was approved 7-0. AYES: Cotten, Dounelly, Floros, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: None At 8:55 p.m., Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Joseph Dennelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary 29*e°un°n ' °rPl er /' ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5153 GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 620 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY WHEREAS, Chades Randolph (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition to amend the Conditional Use permit being the subject of Ordinance No. 5153, approved November 8, 2000 for the operation of an automobile repair business in the B-5 Central Commercial zoning district; and legally described as follows: Lots 53 through 58, (except 3 feet and 1% inches take evenly off the Easterly side of said Lot 58) in Momingside Gardens, a subdivision of part of the Northeast ¼ of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County Illinois; Property Index Number: 08-12-222-026 and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to the Conditional Use permit being the subject of Ordinance No. 5153 to allow the sale of automobiles, which shall not exceed an inventorY of four automobiles at any time; WHEREAS, a Public Headng was held on the requests being the subject of PZ 08-02 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of March, 2002, pursuant to pr.ouper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topic.~ on the 13 day of March, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings on the proposed amendment to the Conditional Use permit to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be attained by granting the requests in PZ 08-02. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: NW Automotive Page 2/2 ~ The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. ~C~[IDJ~L~3/~ That Ordinance No. 5153 granting a Conditional Use permit, passed and approved on November 8, 2000, is hereby amended by granting a Conditional Use permit to include the limited sale of automobiles, which inventory shall not exceed four automobiles at any time, at the subject property as shown on the attached Site Plan hereby made a part hereof as "Exhibit A". ~E.C~LO~L~]:~[: This amendment being the subject of this Ordinance is subject to the following conditions: 1. Implementation of the landscape plan as required by Ordinance 5153 no later than May 1, 2002 or the Petitioner shall establish an escrow account equal to the amount of the required work to ensure the Work is done; 2. No more than four vehicles shall be sold at one time; No signage related to auto sales will be permitted other than an indication on/in the windshield of the vehicle being sold; All conditions of approval listed in Ordinance No. 5153 continue to be applicable. ~E.C~JD~ED~Z~: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley, Village President Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: D ATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 11, 2002 REQUEST FOR 1-YEAR EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL USE ORDINANCE NO. 5037 Attached to this memorandum is a request from Dennis Miller requesting a 1-year extension of Conditional Use Ordinance No. 5037. The Conditional Use Ordinance granted the right to construct a 5-unit townhome development at the SE coruer of Emerson Street and Prospect Avenue. The petitioner has indicated that he has had difficulty finalizing the infrastructure design related to the project and therefore needs additional time to complete the project. The outstanding engineering and surveying issues delaying the project are nearly resolved and therefore the project should move forward in the near furore. Staff does not object to the extension, however we recommend that it be limited to 6 months, thereby requiring that the project begin this summer. -- ~ ~,l~,~.lJ~.- .~~ Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at theilg April 16th meeting. Staff will be present at that meeting to answer any questions related to this matter. ~W~l~iam J. Cooney, AICP VWL 4/9/O2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5037 GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 105 EAST PROSPECT AVENUE WHEREAS, Dennis Miller (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner), was granted a Conditional Use permit and Variation with respect to property located at 105 East Prospect Avenue, (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Tract 1 All of Lot 1, Lot 2 (except the west 31 feet thereof) and that part of the west 31 feet of lot 2 and all of Lots 3, 4, and 43 taken as a tract, lying north of a line drawn 102 feet north of and parallel with the south line of lot 43, as measured along the west line of said Lot in Waldemar Krause's Addition to Mount Prospect in the E ~ of the NW~ of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County Illinois. Tract 2 That part of Lots 2, 3, 4 and 43, taken as a tract lying north of a line drawn 102.00 feet north of and parallel with the south line of Lot 43 in Waldemar Krause's Addition to Mount Prospect in the E ~ of the NWN of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 4, thence south along the west line of Lots 4 and 43, 166.67 feet to the south line of said tract; thence west along the south line of said tract 75.08 feet, thence north parallel with the west line of Lot 4 a distance of 103.77 feet; thence northeast 14.47 feet to a point on the north line of said tract that is 96.62 feet southeast of the nodheast corner of said tract; thence northwest along the north line of said tract ¼ to the point of beginning, in Cook County Illinois. WHEREAS, Petitioner desires to create a Planned Unit Development providing for the construction of a five (5) unit townhouse development, with associated landscape improvements on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, as provided in the Section 14.203.F.11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, the Petitioner is required to complete any approved requests and all conditions within twelve (12) months of the approval of the said request, unless otherwise stated in approved Ordinance; and WHEREAS, Petitioner hereby requests an additional six (6) months from the date of approval of this Ordinance, in which to complete construction of the requested five-unit townhouse development and landscape improvements on the Subject Property, as stated in Ordinance No. 5037. WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have consi~tered the requests being the subject of this Ordinance and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting to the Petitioner the Conditional Use permit and Variation extension, for a term of six months from this date of approval. 105 Prospect Ave. P. 2/2 WHEREAS, the Conditional Use permit and Variation are subject to ali conditions as approved with the passage of Ordinance No. 5037 on August 17, 1999, to be completed within the deSignated six- month period. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BYTHE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, IELINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant an extension of the approved Conditional Use permit and Variation until October 16, 2002, as provided in Section 14.203.F.11 of the Village Code, to allow the Petitioner to meet all requirements as set forth in Ordinance No. 5037. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in fUll force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publicati0n in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER WILLIAM J. COONEY JR., DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APRIL 11, 2002 SUBJECT: ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH - INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING COOK COUNTY CLASS 6 PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT APPLICATION As you may recall, Albany Molecular Research recently purchased the former Great Lakes Chemical facility at 601 E. Kensington Road and received support from the Village for a Class 6 tax abatement. The previous request was for the existing facility and was unfortunately turned down by the Cook Count Assessor's office because it did not meet the 2-year vacancy requirement. The current request is for support for their Class 6 Abatement application for a proposed $3.5 million investment that they are planning for the facility. I have attached a cover letter and information about Albany for the Village Board's review and consideration. Staff and Albany Molecular representatives will be present at the April 16th meeting to further discuss this matter. William $.{Coo-ney Jr. ~ I11 CD 04/10/02 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH INC. MAKING APPLICATION FOR COOK COUNTY CLASS 6 TAX ABATEMENT W H EREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect encourages community development to provide for economic growth and career opportunities; and WHEREAS, through property tax incentives offered by Cook County, vadous opportunities exist for new businesses to become established in Mount Prospect, Cook County; and WHEREAS, without the Cook County property tax incentives, Mount Prospect is at a competitive disadvantage with the neighboring counties of Lake and DuPage in attracting industrial development; and WHEREAS, Albany Molecular Reseamh, Inc., has requested the Village of Mount Prospect to support their application for a Class 6 real property classification at 601 E. Kensington Road; and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect believe that their request is in the best interest of the economic development in the Village of Mount Prospect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES ' OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby support and consent to the application of Albany Molecular Research, Inc., located at 601 E. Kensington Road, for a Class 6 Property Classification from Cook County, which allows a 16% assessment level for the first 10 years, 23% in the 11th year and 30% in the 12th year for the property legally described as follows: Part of Lot 1 of Amer-Stone Subdivision of the North 644 feet of the West 450 feet of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meddian in Cook County, Illinois and further identified by Permanent Index Number 03-35-200-019. SECTION TVVO: That the Village of MoUnt Prospect supports industrial growth, increased employment and economic development and this proposed development is in furtherance of this goal. The Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect further finds that.this incentive is necessary for development to occur on the Subject Property. Albany MoleCular P. 2/2 SECTION THREE: That development of the property is subject to compliance with all requirements of the I-1 (Light Industrial) District and development standards of the Kensington Center for Business. SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM E APRIL 3 , 2002 ~ CT ,~g~NMENTAL POLICE MENTAL H~LTH ASSISTANCE Due to the recent increase in large-scale critical incidents across the country, the Association of Police Social Workers (APSVV) developed the Critical Incident Management Subcommittee. The Village's Bilingual. Social Worker, Nina Persino, is a member of this Subcommittee. The purpose of the subcommittee was to examine how APSW can assist member communities in the delivery of social work/mental health services during a large-scale, Police;managed critical incident. The Intergovernmental Police Mental Health Assistance Agreement was developed to provide this coordinated service. This Agreement is the legal document designed to provide mutual aid within the police social work network similar to other police major crime mutual aid 'agreements such as NORTAF and MCAT. Enclosed is a copy of the Agreement for your review and approval. As you can see, the Agreement needs to be signed by the Village President, Chief of Police, Village Manager and Village Clerk. I believe this is an appropriate Agreement for the Village of Mount Prospect to enter, and I would encourage us to sign the Agreement. If you have .any questions, please contact me at ext. 5322. If you approve of the Agreement, it needs signed and sent to Mr. Desmond Rattery, Secretary, Association of Police Social Workers at Elk Grove Village Police Departme.~901 Wellington, Elk Grove, IL.. 60007. H:NLOU mutual aid agl~ement INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICE MENTAL HEALTH ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT The undersigned municipality, Mount Prospect County of Cook , pursuant to Article VII, Section 10 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act (5 ILCS 220/1 et seq.), and Sections 1-4-6 and 11-1-2.1 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-4-6 and 5/11-1-2.1), agrees as follows: SECTION 1: Purpose of Agreement This Agreement is made in recognition of the fact that the capabilities of mental health personnel in local law enforcement organizations are enhanced by having access to regionalized programs and the assistance of other departments. It is the purpose of this Agreement to enhance access to mental health assistance in police-managed critical incidence through the imergovernmental cooperation of the Participating Municipalities. SECTION 2: Definitions For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall be defined as set forth in this section as follows: A. Agreement This Intergovernmental Police Mental Health Assistance Agreement. B. Participating Municipality Any one or more municipalities that have duly adopted a resolution authorizing the execution of this Agreement. C. Police Mental Health Assistance Assistance provided by any Participating Municipality to any other Participating Municipality, which shall include, but not be limited to, the assignment of mental health personnel and their designees. D. Requesting Municipality A Participating Municipality that requests police mental health assistance pursuant to this Agreement. E. Aiding Municipality A Participating Municipality that provides police mental health assistance pursuant to this Agreement. SECTION 3: Rights of Participating Municipalities The rights of each Participating Municipality shall be as set forth in this Section and shall be exercised by and through the actions of the Chief of Police of each respective Participating Municipality or his/her designee, A. Any participating Municipality may request police mental health assistance from any one or more Participating Municipalities when, in the judgment of the Chief of Police or his/her designee, of the Requesting Municipality such assistance is necessary. B. Any Participating Municipality may render aid to any one or more Participating Municipalities to the extent that the mental health professional of the Aiding Municipality is not required for the delivery of Services within his/her own police jurisdiction. The Chief of Police of the Aiding Municipality, or his/her designee, will determine the number of personnel available to the Requesting Municipality. C. The Aiding Municipality's time commitment shall not exceed 5 days without the approval of the Chief of Police of that municipality, or his designee. D. The Chief of Police of the Requesting Municipality, or his/her designee, shall be entitled t° direct the actions of uny mental health personnel of uny Aiding Municipality providing police mental health assistance pursuant to this Agreement. SECTION 4: Authority of Police Mental Health personnel Any mental health personnel providing police mental health services to a Requesting Municipality under this agreement shall have the authority to perform the mental health duties as assigned by the Requesting Municipality and are subject to the direction of the Chief of Police or his/her designee, of the Requesting Municipality. SECTION 5: Responsibilities of Participating Municipaiities The responsibilities of each Participating Municipality shall be as set forth in this Section. A. Responsibility for Employees Each Participating Municipality shall assume the responsibility for the actions of its mental health personnel pursuunt to this Agreement, both as to indemnification of its personnel and to the payment of benefits to such personnel, to the same extent as such personnel are protected, insured, indemnified and otherwise provided for when acting within the Participating Municipalities' respective corporate limits. B. Compensation of Employees. Each Participating Municipality shall be responsible for the payment of all benefits to all of its mental health personnel acting pursuunt to this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the payment of wages, salaries, disability payments, pension benefits, workers compensation claims, and claims for damage to or destruction of equipment und clothing, und claims for medical expenses. C. The Illinois Mental Health and Development Disabilities Code and the Illinois Mental Health Confidentiality Act will be followed. For limited purposes of sharing information und follow-up services, the Aiding Municipality's mental health personnel will be treated as agents of the Requesting Municipality for reasons of confidentiality and case coordination. SECTION 6: General Provisions A. This Agreement shall be in full force m~d effect and legally binding upon each Participating Municipality at such time as it is signed and certified by that Participating Municipality. B. This Agreement may be amended from time to time by resolution of the corporate authorities of each Participating Municipality. Any amendment not adopted und approved by all Participating Municipalities shall not be effective. The effective date of any amendment shall be the date as of which all Participating Municipalities have approved the amendment. C. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall bind the Participating Municipality executing this Agreement until such time as the corporate authorities of said Participating Municipality adopts a resolution terminating the agreement. Certified copies of such resolution shall be filed with the clerk of all other Participating Municipalities within thirty (30) days of its passage. SECTION 7: Adoption This mutual aide agreement shall be in full force and in effect with the passage and approval of a companion ordinance by all participating municipalities, in the manner provided by law, and in the signing of this agreement by the Village President, City Mayor or Trustees of a municipality. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed by the following parties: Name of Municipality PresidentrMayor Chief of Police Agency Administrator ATTEST: Clerk Date POLICE SOCIAL WORK CALL-OUT NETWORK DuPAGE/WILL NORTHWEST I NORTH LAKE /McHENRY I COUNTIES SUBURBS SUBURBS COUNTIES Bolingbrook Carpentersville Deerfield Buffalo Grove Bridgeview Elgin Des Plaines Carpentersville Carol Stream Elk Grove Village Evanston Lake of the Hills Downers Grove Hanover Park Glencoe Vernon Hills DuPage Co. Sheriff Mount Prospect Glenview Glendale Heights Palatine Morton Grove Hickory Hills Park Ridge Northbrook Hillside : Prospect Heights Northfie!d Joliet Rolling Meadows Skokie Naperville Schaumburg Wheeling Romeoville West Chicago Wilmet~e West Chicago Wheeling Winnetka Wheaton Willow Springs Woodridge O4/O9/O2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ASSOCIATION OF POLICE SOCIAL WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY MENTAL HEALTH ASSISTANCE WHEREAS, the Cdtical Incident Management Subcommittee of the Association of Police Social Workers ("APSVif') has recognized the need to develop a joint mutual aid agreement in the event of a large scale, police-managed cdtical incident; and WHEREAS, such occurrence requires assistance from other participating member municipalities in the form of, but not limited to, mental health personnel; and WHEREAS, the APSW developed the Intergovernmental Police Mental Health Assistance Agreement ("the Intergovernmental Agreement") to address mental health personnel assistance for such emergencies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize the Village Manager, the Chief of Police, and the Mayor to sign, with the Clerk attesting his signature on the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Association of Police Social Workers Critical Incident Management Subcommittee for emergency mental health personnel assistance in the event of a large scale police-managed critical incident. SECTION TWO: That the Mount Prospect Chief of Police and his/her designee reserves the right to determine the extent of general assistance as provided for in the Intergovernmental Agreement, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". Mental health agrmt. Page 2/2 SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Fadey Mayor Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER DAVE STRAHL HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PATRICK J: SEGER APRIL 11,2002 PROPOSAL TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL BENEFIT COOPERATIVE (IPBC) Please find attached the proposed resolUtion requesting the extenSiOn of partiCiPation within the Intergovernmental Personnel Benefit Cooperative (IPBC) for the next three (3) years, commencing July 1, 2002. The IPBC is an intergovernmental entity, made-up of twenty-two (22)local municipalities that purchases health, dental, and life insurance benefits as a cooperative for almost 2,000 employees. One of the advantages of being part of the larger I PBC pool is that the group is able to negotiate better insurance rates versus a smaller stand-alone employer. Another advantage of the pooling system is that employers that experience extremely high claims one year, will benefit from the other employers within the pool, having lower or moderate claims for that particular year. Essentially there is a sharing of risk, which theoretically, creates a more'stable insurance environment, hence reducing the possibility of receiving premium increases of 30% to 50% due to a bad year. Historically, the insurance rates that the Village of Mount Prospect has experienced over the last three (3) years have, by and large, followed national insurance trends. The upcoming 2002/2003 benefit year, will see a 21% increase in our PPO insurance and a 12% increase for our HMO insurance. The table below will illustrate the 2002 national insurance tread for both PPO and HMO. Carrier 2002 PPO Tread Factor 2002 HMO Trend Factor Blue Cross Blue Shield IL 17.5% 10.5% -UniCare 15.4% 11.0% Humana 17.5% 13.0% United Healthcare 17.0% 15.5% H:\GEN\Personnel\Benefits\IPBC participation 2002,doc ~ roposal To Continue Participation In The Intergovernmental Personnel Benefit Cooperative (IPBC) April 11, 2002 Page 2 Although the insurance increase the Village will receive for the upcoming 2002/2003 benefit year is slightly higher than the national trend increase for PPO insurance, I believe we should continue our participation in the IPBC for the next three (3) years. With the uncertainty and volatility within the health insurance market, participation in the IPBC pool will help stabilize rate fluctuations and increases. As published, future health insurance rates are predicted to experience double-digit increases over the next couple of years, therefore, strategies such as health insurance pools are important in alleviating the impacts of the national health care market. As we approach the midpoint of the three (3) year contact in 2004/2005, we will conduct a complete evaluation of the insurance market and determine the pros and cons of leaving the IPBC. At that time, we may experience a less volatile health care insurance market. I recommend the proposed resolution for Village Board approval at the April 16, 2002 meeting. If you have any questions, please contact me. P '~m akn~JR~" e/'~//0~r~c s/iD i re cto r PJS/dm Attachment C: Village Clerk Velma Lowe H:\GEN\PersonneI\Bene~s\lPBC Participation 2002.doc VWL 04/09/02 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE PERIOD OF PARTICIPATION IN THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL BENEFIT COOPERATIVE FOR A PERIOD OF THREE ADDITIONAL YEARS WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, a municipal corporation, is a member of the Intergovernmental Personnel Benefit Cooperative ("IPBC"), which is an intergovernmental entity providing employee benefits to the officers and employees of this municipality; and WHEREAS, through its' membership in the IPBC, this municipality gains the ability to achieve economies of scale in the administration of the benefit claims of its employees and the other benefits of membership provided for in the Contract and By-Laws of the IPBC; and WHEREAS, the Contract and by-Laws of the IPBC provide that the IPBC shall operate in three (3) year terms, with the governing board of each member, including the governing board of this municipality, being required to pass an ordinance or resolution agreeing to continue as a member for each new term; and WHEREAS, failure to approve a timely ordinance or resolution at least sixty (60) days before the commencement date of a new term shall constitute a withdrawal from the IPBC; and WHEREAS, the next three (3) year term of the IPBC commences on July 1,2002; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect desires to express, through the passage of this Resolution, its intent to continue as a member of the IPBC for the three-year term commencing on July 1, 2002, provided that an adequate number of other members of the cooperative, as set forth within the Contract and By-Laws document, also agree to continue as members for the next term. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, iLLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The Village of Mount Prospect shall continue as a member of the Intergovernmental Personnel Benefit Cooperative for a three-year term commencing on July 1, 2002, in accordance with the Contract and By-Laws of that entity as .they currently exist or as they may be validly amended in the future. IPBC Membership P. 2/2 SECTION TWO: The obligation of this municipality to be a member of the Intergovernmental Personnel Benefit Cooperative shall obligate this Village to make financial contributions to the Intergovernmental Personnel Benefit Cooperative only to the extent required from as specified by the Contract and By-Laws of the IPBC. SECTION THREE: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect uPon its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ., 2002. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF FINANCE APRIL 11,2002 LIBRARY FINANCING PURPOSE: To present for the Village Board's consideration a request to proceed with the issuance of $20.5 million general obligation bonds for the benefit of the Mount Prospect Public Library, and to authorize the Mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement between the Village and the Library providing for the issuance of the bonds and the repayment of principal and interest. BACKGROUND: The Village Board passed Ordinance No. 5222 on December 18, 2001, establishing an advisory referendum for the submission of a public question on the ballot for the March 19, 2002primary election. An official canvass of the election results on March 25, 2002 found that the advisory referendum question passed with 5,831 Yes votes and 3,820 No votes. Resolution No. 19-02, passed on April 2, 2002, declared the results of the ~i-imary election, and officially declared the referendum question as passed. DISCUSSION: The Library Board is asking the Village to issue $20.5 million of general obligation bonds on behalf of the Library to allow a major expansion/improvement project to proceed. Attached hereto is an intergovernmental agreement that would obligate the Village to issue the bonds and obligate the Library to provide the necessary funds to the Village to cover semi- annual debt service payments. The primary goal of the agreement from the Village's standpoint was to ensure that the annual debt service tax levy associated with these bonds could be abated by the Village using funds provided by the Library. Simply put, we wanted the Library's tax levy and tax rate, not the Village's, to reflect the repayment of the bond principal and interest. IBRARY BOND FINANCING APRIL 11, 2002 Page 2 Annual debt service is estimated at $1,677,184 per year for twenty years. This is a 38% increase over the $4,417,240 levied for the Library in 2001. I am being told by the Library's financial consultant that the Library intends on using a portion of the 24% increase in the 2001 Library Operations levy to cover a portion of the tax increase associated with the bond issue. Following the intergovernmental agreement is a copy of the following documents: · Projected Debt Service Payments · Projected Design and Construction Schedule · Estimated Project Budget · Estimated Cash Flow Projections · Comparative Facts Summarizing the Improvements to be made · Planned Financing Timetable RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Village Board authorize the execution of an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Mount Prospect Public Library and authorize the Village staff to proceed with a bond sale in the amount of $20.5 million. DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA DIRECTOR OF FINANCE DRE/ I:\Debt~002 Library G.O\Board memo 4-11-02.doc INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT is entered into this ~day of , 2002, by and between the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS (hereinafter "the VILLAGE"), an Illinois home rule municipal corporation, and the MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY (hereinafter"the LIBRARY"), an Illinois Village Public Library. WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10, of the Illinois Constitution provides that units of local government may contract among themselves, to obtain or share services, to exercise, combine or transfer any power or function in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance, and may use their revenues to pay costs related to intergovernmental activities, and the Illinois Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, and that one or more public agencies may contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform; and WHEREAS, the LIBRARY, not having the legal authority te directly cause municipal bonds to be issued, desires the VILLAGE to cause general obligation bonds to be issued in the amount of $20,500,000 to fund the expansion of and improvement to the existing public library (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the VILLAGE has approved the plan of the LIBRARY for the construction of the Project; and WHEREAS, the VILLAGE has agreed to provide for the issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $20,500,000(the "Bonds") to pay the costs of the Project pursuant to 75 ILCS 5/5-2; and WHEREAS, the VILLAGE, in return for issuing the Bonds, desires the LIBRARY, pursuant to 75 ILCS 5~4-7, to assume full responsibility for the repayment of the bonds, inclusive of principal and interest, and all costs associated with the bond issue as well as for the construction of the Project; and WHEREAS, the VILLAGE and the LIBRARY desire a third party trustee to retain control of the proceeds of the Bonds (the "Bond Proceeds") and that the VILLAGE shall retain control of the proceeds of the taxes collected for payment of principal and interest thereon in order to ensure that all federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding use and distribution of the Bond Proceeds are met; and WHEREAS, the VILLAGE and the LIBRARY have subsequently entered into negotiations and, as a result of these negotiations, the VILLAGE and the LIBRARY have each determined that it is advisable and in their best interests to enter into an agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual promises and consideration set forth herein, the terms and conditions hereof, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals The foregoing recitals shall be and are hereby incorporated into and made part of this Agreement as though they were fully set forth in this Section 1. Section 2. Issuance of the Bonds The VILLAGE shall issue its Bonds pursuant to an ordinance (the "Bond Ordinance"). The proceeds of the Bonds shall be retained in the care and custody of its Treasurer/Finance Director, who shall pay the legal, fiscal and administrative costs of issuance and thereafter remit the remainder to the financial institution provided for in Section 3 of this Agreement and shall do so pursuant to all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. The VILLAGE shall have the right to select both bond legal counsel and an appropriate financial advisor for the Bond Issue. Section 3. Trustee Administrator of Bond Proceeds The VILLAGE and the LIBRARY shall select an independent financial institution(the "DEPOSITORY") to retain custody of and administer the Bond Proceeds during the period that this Agreement remains in force. Section 4. Payments from Bond Proceeds The VILLAGE's and the LIBRARY's agreement with the DEPOSITORY shall provide that the DEPOSITORY shall receive warrants issued by the Treasurer of the Board of Library Trustees. The warrants shall be supported by certificates, as required by the Contract between the LIBRARY and its architect, and shall list items for payments and payees. The DEPOSITORY shall then distribute to the listed payees the amounts so listed and certified, in accordance with the terms of the Contract between the LIBRARY and its Contractor. In addition, the DEPOSITORY shall, upon receipt of the warrants issued by the Treasurer of the Board of Library Trustees, distribute to the listed payees the amounts requested as required by the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, 50 ILCS 505/1, et seq. The warrants shall list for payment any other items related to the Project as are allowed to be paid from the Bond Proceeds bythe provision of the Bond Ordinance and the payees. During the period when there are funds remaining in the Project Fund, the Trustees shall also be required to contract for the arbitrage rebate calculation each year as required by the United States Internal Revenue Service. The Treasurer of the Board of Library DEPOSlTORYs shall issue such warrants in a timely fashion. The VILLAGE does not make any warranty, either express or implied, that the moneys on deposit in the Project Fund will be sufficient to pay all costs incurred in connection with the Project. - ~' Section 5. Investment of Bond Proceeds The VILLAGE's and the LIBRARY's agreement with the DEPOSITORY shall provide that the DEPOSITORY shall invest the Bond Proceeds as provided by law and as directed by the VILLAGE and shall report monthly to the VILLAGE and the LIBRARY, pursuant to Section 6 of the Intergovernmental Agreement, interest - 4 - earnings and expenses pertaining to such investment as such expenses are charged by any third parties. Section 6. Custody of Taxes Collected for Debt Service The LIBRARY shall approve and certify budgets and levy tax extension determinations in amounts sufficient to cover the repayment of all Principal and interest on the Bonds issued by the VILLAGE, as well as all costs incurred by the VILLAGE under Section 8 and Section 9 of this Agreement. The LIBRARY shall hold monies received from such determinations as they are received from the Cook County Treasurer and remit the monies to the VILLAGE on a semiannual basis. The payments shall be due on May 1, and November t, of each year. The VILLAGE shall also keep in the care and custody of its Treasurer/Finance Director the property taxes remitted to it which have been collected pursuant to statute for payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds. Section 7. Reports The VILLAGE and the LIBRARY's agreement with the DEPOSITORY shall provide that the DEPOSITORY shall provide the VILLAGE and the .LIBRARY with monthly reports containing an accounting of all activity pertaining to the Bond Proceeds and the Taxes and interest earned thereon which the DEPOSITORY holds in his or her care and custody pursuant to this Agreement. The DEPOSITORY shall also be required to report the results of the annual arbitrage rebate calculation as provided in Section 4 of this Agreement to the VILLAGE and the LIBRARY. Such - 5 - reports shall be made and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Section 8. Surety The VILLAGE's and the LIBRARY's agreement with the DEPOSITORY shall provide that the DEPOSITORY shall supply a surety bond to secure the true and faithful performance of the fiduciary duties pursuant to the terms of this Agreement in the amount of not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the funds received, as required by Section 5/4-9 of the Local LibraryAct. Such bond shall be provided by a surety approved by both the VILLAGE and the LIBRARY, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, and the cost of such surety bond shall be borne by the LIBRARY. Section 9. Costs of Bond Issuance and Administration The LIBRARY shall pay the costs of the Bond Issuance and administrative costs due to third parties, including but not limited to, attorney's fees, including fees for bond counsel and fees for the Village Attorney associated with the Bond Issuance and/or administration, and for underwriter, financial consultant, investment and arbitrage services where such services are reasonably necessary and appropriate and the services of the DEPOSITORY. Should arbitrage laws make rebates necessary and amounts required to be rebated are not available from Bond Proceeds, the LIBRARY shall provide all additional amounts necessary to meet the requirements of the law. Section 10. Termination This Agreement shall terminate upon the final payment of principal and interest on the Bonds. The agreement with the DEPOSITORY shall cease upon the final disposition of moneys in the Project Fund. Section 11. Complete Understandin.q. This Agreement sets forth all of the promises, agreements, conditions and understandings between the parties regarding the subject matter of this Agreement, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions and understandings, either oral or written, other than the contents of this Agreement. Section 12. Bindin.q Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the VILLAGE, and the LIBRARY, and their respective legal representatives and successors. Section 13. Partial Invalidity. The clauses, provisions and sections of this Agreement are deemed by the parties to be separable and the invalidity of any portion of this Agreement shall not effect the validity of the remainder. ~ _ Section '14. Notices. All notices and demands required hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given or made when delivered personally or when mailed by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: - ? For the VILLAGE: Village Treasurer/Finance Director Village Hall 100 South Emerson Avenue Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Library Director Mount Prospect Public Library 10 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 or at other such addresses as the parties may indicate in writing to the other either by personal delivery or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, with proof of delivery thereof. Section '14. Execution This Agreement is entered into by the duly authorized agents of the Parties, each acting pursuant to the laws and ordinances governing their designation as signatories of the Agreement. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, an Illinois home rule Municipal corporation ATTEST: By:. Village President By: Village Clerk MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY ATTEST: By: President, Board of Library Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect By: Secretary, Board of Library Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect @PFDesktop\::ODMPJMHODMA/iManage;87666;2 Mount Prospect - $20,500,000 G~O~ Library Boads, Interest start date: 07/01/02 First interest payment: 12/01/03 Series 2002 Bid per $1000 990.00000000 NIC 5.12668% Avg coupon 5~04735% Avg life 12.60617886 Bond yrs 258,426.67 Interest start date: 07/01/02 First interest payment: 12/01/03 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE PERIOD ANNUAL ENDING PRINCIPAL RATE 1 12/01/03 300t000.00 2.050 2 12/01/04 715t000.00 2.850 3 12/01/05 735,000.00 3.350 4 12/01/06 760~000.00 3.650 5 12/01/07 785t000.00 3.950 6 12/01/08 815t000.00 4.150 7 12/01/09 850~000.00 4.350 8 12/01/10 885~000.00 4.450 9 12/01/11 925t000.00 4.550 10 12/01/12 970,000.00 4.650 11 12/01/13 1~ 015~ 000.00 4.750 12 12/01/14 it 060~ 000.00 4.850 13 12/01/15 1,115,000.00 4.950 14 12/01/16 it 170t 000.00 5. 050 15 12/01/17 It 225t 000.00 5. 100 16 12/01/18 1~ 290~ 000.00 5. 200 17 12/01/19 1~ 355~ 000.00 5. 400 18 12/01/20 1,430t 000.00 5. 450 19 12/01/21 it 510, 000.00 5. 450 20 12/01/22 It 590~ 000.00 5.450 INTEREST TOTAL 1~ 375t 271.67 964~ 630.00 944~ 252.50 919t 630.00 891~ 890.00 1~ 675t 271.67 1~ 679~ 630.00 it 679t 252.50 1~ 679~ 630.00 It 676~ 890.00 860~ 882.50 827t 060.00 790~ 085.00 750~ 702.50 708~ 615.00 663~ 510.00 615~ 297.50 563,887; 50 508; 695.00 449~ 610.00 387t 135.00 320~ 055.00 246~ 885.00 168~ 950.00 86~ 655.00 it 675t 882.50 1~ 677~ 060.00 1,675~ 085.00 1~ 675~ 702.50 1~ 678~ 615.00 1~ 67~ 510.00 1,675, 297.50 it 678t 887.50 1~ 678~ 695.00 It 674~ 610.00 1~ 677t 135.00 1,675~ 055.00 It 676~ 885.00 1~ 678~ 950~ 00 1~ 676~ 655.00 TOTAL 20t 500,000.00 13,043~ 699.17 33~ 543t 699.17 04/10/02 10:11 FAX 18479985503 R.¥.Norene Assoc [~]02 t~ 04/10/02 10:11 FAX 18479985503 R.V.Norene Assoc ~nF~ Comparative Facts Mount Prospect Public Library Features Gross Square Footage Public computers Group/Quiet Study Areas Meeting Rooms Meeting Room capacity Teen (Young Adult) area Youth Services Public area Storyl'ime Room Storyfime Room capacity Reading chairs Table chairs Study Carrels Present 50,000 sq. ft. 35 stations 0 1,175 sq. ff. 80 persons 0 sq.ft. *Proposed 95,000 sq. ft. 60 stations 7 3,290 sq. ff. 200 persons 1,340 sq. ff. 5,500 sq, ff. 12,800 sq, ft. 242 sq. ff. 700 sq. ft. 18 persons 45 persons 0 17 40 234 0 12 Adult Services Public area Reading chairs Table chairs Study Carrels -23,800 sq, ft, 31,100 sq. ff. 2 - 30 .112 236 15 57 The Mount Prospect Public Library Board of Trustees is asking residents to approve a referendum to support a $20.5 million band issue to fund this capital improvement plan for the Library on the March 19, 2002 primary ballot. The cost to the average taxpayer will be $39,00 per year or $3,25 a month, * These figures are based on the reduced Schematic Building Program Statement, 1999. Mount Prospect Public Ubrary 10 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 847/253-5675 * TDD 253-8685 www, mppl,org R.V. NORENE & Associates, Inc. Tuesday, March 19, 2002 Tuesday. April 16. 2002 Thursday. April la0 2002 Wednesday, May 1, 2002 Thursday, May 2. 2002 Monday. May 6, 2002. Tuesday. May 7, 2002 Tuesday. May 14. 2002 Wednesday. May 15, 2002 Tuesday. May 21. 2002 Wednesday. May22,2002 FHday. May 24, 2002 Tuesday. June 11. 2002 Fi. V. Norene& ASSOCiates, Inc. March 20. 2002 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRO-~PECT, ILLINOIS GENERAL OBLIGATION LIBRARY BONDS, BERIBB 2002 - Library bonds approved at the prtrna~¥ election. R.V. Not. ne & Associates. Inc. (RVN&A) mail newa releases regarding Tuesday, May 21, 2002 bid opening. Fax text to Bond Buyer for "New on CaJendal~ and '.~.,eelsd Bide' for Monday, April 29, 2002 edition. RVN&A mall text of Summary Notl~ of ~ala to Wall Street Journal for publication on Wednesday, May 15, 2002. - RVN&A fax Notice of B~le to SURE BID for bid guarantee - R~ f~ matu~ s~edule and bond details to ~nd Counsel for preparation of - RVN~ e;mal~del~er draff of Official ~ate~nt, ~lcl~ N~ of ~ ~llage, Ubm~ and Bond ~unsel for review and telephone ~mment by Noon, Monday, ~y 6, 2002, Bond Counsel provide Village w~ draff Bond O~l~ance for Inclusion In Board pac~ for May 7, 2002 Boa~ Meeting. Village ~lephone RVN&A wEh oommen~ on O~iN StatemeM. RVN~ provide ~me~ ~a~ te~ of ~lcJal ~tement. ~[~ial Notige ~ ~le~Id Fo~ to p~nter. RVN&A mall all info.etlon to M~dy's ~r inve~ mt~g. ~VN&A f~ to CUSIP Bureau for CUSIP number asslg~me~ to matu~ies. R~ ~il (~m ~]ing) pdnted ~clal Statement, ~lcl~ Noti~ of ~ale~id Fo~ to dealer banes and i~estment banke~unde~rgem. ~VN&A p~vide disk to ~ Solutions ~r Inaction of the Offici~ Stato~nt on the B oomberg ~ystom (over 20,000 screens ~r Under,tar ~s a~ instit~ional tine RVN&A add Pmllmln~ ~cl~ Statement on homepage (~.wnomne-assoc- In=.~m). RVN~ ~ (se~nd m~ling) to investing institutions ~d Inve~ment advIsom RVN~ publish Sum~ Notice of ~e In Chl~g0 edition of the W~ Street Journal - - this adve~isement tells ind~dua; Inv~tore how to obtain the Off.iai Statement which will be available on the interact at Bond Bid Opening ~ 12:00 Noon, C.D.T., ~ the offices of R.V. Norene& ~istes. In;., 1701 ~ke Avenue, Suite 215, Glenview, Illincis. Bond Cou~el e-mall final Bond Ordinance to DepositoW notified regaling global book ent~. D~ffi "~n~l ~e~l ~tatemen~ f~ed ~ pu~ha~r, ~nd Counsel and insurer app[~able) for approval on M~y 24, RVN~ complete 'Final" Official S~tement a~ provide copies to purcha~r for distdb~lon to Investom (within SEC reqUi~d seven business da~ of the bond ~llage Boa~ meetings 1st ~nd 3~ O4/09/02 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FOR THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS WHEREAS, a Pdmary Election was held in and for the Village of Mount Prospect on March 19, 2002; and WHEREAS, a referendum question was presented to the electors of the Village of Mount Prospect in said Primary Election, at which time the referendum question received a greater number of affirmative votes, determining that the Village should issue general obligation bonds for the renovation and expansion of the Library; and WHEREAS, said general obligation bonds shall be issued in an amount not to exceed $20,500,000, bearing interest at a rate not to exceed six-percent (6%) per annum; and WHEREAS, the Village and the Library have negotiated an Intergovemmental Agreement setting forth the Village's and Library's rights and obligations in connection with said issue of general obligation bonds, maintenance and disbursement of bond proceeds, repayment of principal and interest of said bonds and costs associated therewith. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest his signature on the Intergovemmental Agreement between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Mount Prospect Public Library for the issuance of $20,500,000 in general obligation bonds as provided for in the Intergovernmental Agreement, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". VOMP & MPL agrmt. Page 2/2 SECTION TWO: after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and .,2002. ATTEST: Gerald b Fadey Mayor Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk illage of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: VILLAGE IVANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE APRIL 4, 2002 2002 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 1 PURPOSE: To present a recommendation the annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2002 and ending December 31, 2002 be amended. BACKGROUND: Ordinance 5227, adopted December 18, 2001, established the annual budget br the year ending December 31, 2002. DISCUSSION: Governments often find themselves in a position of having to amend their current ~ear's budget to reflect material variations in revenues and expenditures. Typically, these variations are the result of timing differences in either the completion of major capital projects or the receipt and disbursement of certain revenues or expenses. A proposed ordinance amending the 2002 Annual Budget is attached for the Board's consideration. This document includes the budget changes ~ou have reviewed and recommended be brought to the Board. In total, we are increasing our revenue projections by $77,453 and increasing the budget for expenditures by $3,269,335. All but a few of the increases to the expenditure budget reflect carry- overs from the 2001 Budget. Several projects and purchases were not initiated and/or not completed by year-end as originally expected. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Village Board adopt the proposed ordinance amending the 2002 Annual DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA Copy: Finance Commission Department Directors I:~budget~2002~Ameodments\Board Memo 4-4-02.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2002 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2002 WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have passed and approved Ordinance No. 2342 which sets the finances of the Village under the "Budget Officer System"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid Ordinance and the Statutes of the State of Illinois an annual budget for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 2002 and ending December 31, 2002 was adopted through the passage of Ordinance No. 5227 approved by the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect on December 18, 2001; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have further reviewed certain additions and changes to the aforesaid budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2002 and ending December 31, 2002; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect believe the changes, as specified on the attached January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002 Budget Amendment No. 1 to be in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the Village has now revised the revenue projections or has reserves in each of the Funds in which the budget is being increased adequate in amount to cover the budget changes reflected in Budget Amendment No. 1, attached bereto2 NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the fiscal year budget for January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002 for the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby amended, as detailed on Budget Amendment No. 1 attached hereto. SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full fome and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2002. ATTEST Gerald L. Farley, Village President Velma W. I. owe, Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Amendment No. 1 Fiscal Year January 1, 2002 through December 3,1, 2002 Revenues Original Amended Item Revenue Increase Revenue No. Fund/Pro~lram/Classification Account # Account Description Estimate (Decrease} Estimate Capital Improvements Fund I Reimbumements 5100000-470900 Other Reimbursements 116,097 77,453 193,550 All other Capital Improvements Fund accounts 854,600 0 854.600 Total Capital Improvements Fund 970,697 77,453 1,048.150 Total Estimated Revenues Funds being changed All other Village Budget accounts Total Estimated Revenues After Changes 970,697 77.453 1,048,150 71,331.259 0 71,331,259 72.301,956 77,453 72.379,409 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Amendment No. 1 Fiscal Year January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002 Expenditures Item No. Fund/Procjram/Classiflcation Account # General Fund Human Services Administration Contractual Services 0013101-540040 Police Depart. - Equipt" M~inten~nce Account Description ComPuter Programming Budget Amount 500 2 Contractual Services Public Works Adrain 3 Office Equipment Public Works Streets Div. 4 Infrastructure 5 Infrastructure 6 Infrastructure All other General Fund Accounts Total General Fund 0014106-540605 VRM Maintenance 17.250 0015001-650008 Office Equipment 1,500 0015104-690003 0015104-690004 0015104-690068 Sidewalk Construction 10,000 Sidewalk Constr- Cost Share 103,500 Sidewalk Improvements 60,000 192,750 28,299,515 28,492,265 Increase , (Decrease) 10,000 7,500 3,000 48.000 31,000 3,000 102,000 0 102,000 Amended Budget Amount 10,500 24,250 4,500 58,000 134,500 63,000 294,750 28,299,515 28,594,265 Motor Fuel Tax Fund Traffic Control and Street Lighting 7 Contractual Services 0505405-540660 8 Infrastructure 0505405-690058 Street Improvement Projects 9 Infrastructure 0507706-690005 10 Infrastructure ' 0507706-690049 11 Infrastructure 0507706-690096 NI other Motor Fuel Tax Fund Accounts Total Motor Fuel Tax Fund Traffic Light Maintenance 70,000 Traffic Signal Replacement 15,000 Street Light Improvements 119,303 Street Resurfacing 1,190,000 NW Hwy Resurfacing 0 32,500 110,000 240,300 290,400 16.093 102,000 125,000 359,603 1,480~00 16,093 1,394,303 688,793 2,083,096 633,110 0 633,110 2,027,413 688,793 2,716,206 Community Development Block Grant Fund CDBG Accessibility and Neighborhood Improve. 12 Building Improvements 0702306-640009 13 Building Improvements 0702306-640010 14 Infrastructure 0702306-690020 15 thfrastructera 0702306-690030 Ail other CDBG Accounts Total CDBG Fund CDBG Sidewalk Improve. CEDA Budding Rehab Boxwood Streetlights Judith Ann St. Reconstruct. 80,000 12,111 92.111 25,000 20,000 45,000 0 73,067 73,067 0 190.408 190,408 105,500 295,586 400,586 356.265 0 356,265 461,265 295,586 756,851 Capital Improvement Fund Village Improvements 16 Building Improvements 17 Building Improvements 18 Office Equipment 19 Other Equipment Community Improvements 20 Land Improvements 21 Infrastructure 22 Infrastructure 5107701-640001 5107701-640019 5107701-650037 5107701-670067 5107702-620008 5107702-690003 5107702-690005 Other Public Buildings General Store Restoration Hand Held Computers- Fire Telephone Systems - VH Corddor Improvements Sidewalk Improveraents Residential Street Lights 65,000 85,000 150,000 0 22,380 22,380 0 35,000 35,000 10,000 30,000 40,000 300,000 316,678 616,678 0 58,474 58,474 678,697 108,000 786,697. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Amendment No. 1 Fiscal Year January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002 Expenditures Item No. Fund/Pro,ram/Classification Account # Account Description Street Improvement Projects 23 infrastructure 5107706-690099 24 Infrastructure 5107706-690104 Bridge Rehabilitation Wotf Road Engineering All other Capital Improve. Fd. Accounts Total Capital Improvement Fund 25 26 Downtown Redevelopment Construction Fund Downtown Redevelopment Costs Infrastructure 5507705-690065 Infrastructure 5507703-690059 Ail other Downtown Redevetopment Constr. Fd. Accounts Total Oowntown Redevelopment Constr. Fund Brick Sidewalks O/T Streetscape CIO Budget Amount 0 48,000 1,101,697 385,636 1,487,333 10,000 115,000 Amended Increase Budget (Decrease) Amount 26,000 26,000 20,000 68,000 701,532 1,803,229 0 385,636 701,532 2,188,865 7,000 17,000 268,075 383,075 125,000 275,075 400,075 1,152,347 0 1,152,347 1,277,347 275,075 1,552,422 0 442,325 442,325 2~14~63 0 2,414,463 2,414~63 442,325 2,856,788 27 Street Improvement Fund Street Improvement Projects Infrastructure 5607706-690094 Ail other Street Improvement Fund accounts Total Street Improvement Fund Street Reconstruction 28 Flood Control Constr. Fd Flood Control Projects Contractual Services 5907704-540582 All other Flood Contr~ Constr. Fd accounts Total Flood Control Cor~str. Fund Water and Sewer Fund Water Administration 29 Contractual Services Water Supply M & R 30 Distribution Systems Water Distribution M & R 31 Other Equipment Watsr Meter Maint. & Replacement 32 Contractual Services 6105501-540612 6105504-680001 6105505-670038 6105507-540040 Ail other Water and Sewer Fd accounts Total Water and Sewer Fund Storm Swrlnventory& Maps 75,000 39,099 114,099 2,590,000 0 2,590,000 : 2,665,000 39,099 2,704,099 ' GIS Maintenance Tank Repair/Renovation Booster Pump/Panel Repl. Computer Programming 40,140 82,800 122,940 0 10,000 10.000 450,000 150,000 600,000 3,250 493,390 8,323,972 3,000 6,250, 245,800 739,190 0 8,323,972 8,817,362 245,800 9,063,162 0 130,000 130,000 378,318 0 378,318 378,318 130,000 508,318. 33 Parking Revenue Fund Village Improvements & Equipment Building Improvements 6307701-640014 Ail other Parking Revenue Fund accounts Total Parking Revenue Fund Train Station Improvements VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Amendment No. 1 Fiscal Year January 1, 2002 through December 3'1, 2002 Expenditures Item No. 34 Fund/Pro~ram/Classiflcation Account # Vehicle Maintenance Fund VehicJe Maintenance Other Equipment 6605702-670111 All other Vehicle Maintenance Fund accounts Total Vehicle Maintenance Fund Account Description Oil Storage Tank Upgrade Current Amended Budget Increase Budget Amount (Decrease) ~Amount 0 18,000 18,000 1,150,979 0 _,,1,150,979 1,150.979 18,900 1.168,979 Vehicle Replacement Fund Motor Equipment Replacement 35 Mobile Equipment 36 Mobile Equipment 37 Mobile Equipment 6707709-660115 6707709-660120 6707709-660524 Ail other Vehicle Replacement Fund accounts Total Vehicle Replacement Fund Public Works Vehicles Fire Vehicles Pool Vehicles 653,900 265,126 919,026 115,000 32,000 147.000 0 26.231 26,231 768,900 323 357 1,092,257 335,700 0 335,700 1.104,600 323,357 1,427,957 38 Risk Management Fund Public Works Forestry Program Contractual Services 6905203-540740 All other Risk Management Fund accounts Total Risk Management Fund Total Village Budget Funds being changed All other Village Budget accounts Total Village Budget after Changes Tree Hazard Study 10,000 7.768 17.768 3,870,325 0 3,870.325 3,880,32~5 7,76~8 3,8.~__~,093 54,156,670 3.269.335 57,426.005 17.867.211 0 17,867,211 72.023,881 3,269,335 75.293,216