Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7. MANAGERS REPORT 7/6/04 IIjfð Mount Prospect Public Works Department @ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 11ŒE em L'SA FROM: DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ~~)~~ TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHEAL E. JANONIS DATE: JULY 1, 2004 MAY 2004 DES PLAINES RIVER FLOODING COSTS SUBJ: Background On Saturday, May 22,2004, the National Weather Service issued a flood warning for the Des Plaines River near Des Plaines, Illinois. This warning forecasted a record river crest of 11.44 feet near the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Des P!aines, Illinois river gauge. The NOAA gauge is located on the river in the Cook County Forest Preserve between Kensington Road and Euclid Avenue. The river was forecasted to crest near this gauge on Wednesday, May 26. Such a crest would have exceeded the 10.88-feet flood of record that occurred on October 1, 1986. Due to the widespread property damage that occurred as a result of the 1986 flood, Public Works staff, in conjunction with representatives from the City of Prospect Heights, initiated an emergency response plan that culminated in the construction of a 2,295-foot long sandbag retaining along Des Plaines River Road (River Road) between Milwaukee Avenue and Woodview Drive. The wall, positioned along the highest elevations of River Road, ranged in height from 4 feet to 1 foot and was constructed with approximately 75,000 sandbags filled with over 1,800 tons of sand. Staff determined that this wall, along with mechanical dewatering of the local storm sewer system, were measures necessary to prevent a repeat of the conditions that caused the 1986 flooding. Mount Prospect and Prospect Heights public works crews initiated preparatory measures for construction of the sandbag wall on Sunday, May 23. Site work on River Road began on Monday, May 24, and was completed shortly after sundown on Tuesday, May 25. Public Works crews worked 12-hour shifts around the clock in an effort to finish the wall before the crest. However, this fete would not have been possible without a truly inspiring show of support from hundreds of volunteers including local residents, school children, various civic groups, and off-duty fire and police personnel. Even the United States Navy lent a helping hand sending several groups of energetic and task- oriented recruits from the Great lakes Naval Training Center to help stem the tide. In the end, the Des Plaines River crested at 8.52 feet on May 27; almost three (3) feet below and a day later than the originally forecasted crest. Suffice it to say, some PW staffers were literally "crest-fallen" to learn that their creation would not be adequately tested. Others have suggested that the positive energy generated by the Herculean human effort forced the river to stay near its banks. Regardless, the exercise was Page 2 of 3 May 2004 Des Plaines River Flooding Costs July 1, 2004 unavoidable due to the magnitude of the consequences and the huge effort necessary to construct a viable defense. Mount Prospect and Prospect Heights public works crews, utilizing mechanized equipment, demolished the wall on Friday, May 28. 30 trucks from various private cartage firms were used to haul the sandbags. Some of the sandbags were carted to horse farms in Hampshire, Illinois where they were debagged and the sand reused. Unfortunately, efforts to find other uses for the sand were limited by the desire to reopen River Road in an expeditious manner. Consequently, most of the sandbags were hauled to the ARC Disposal Company transfer station in Mount Prospect where they were temporarily stockpiled and later landfiUed. Des Plaines River Road was reopened to normal traffic flow at 7:00 PM on Friday, May 28. Mount Prospect Public Works crews continued dewatering the storm sewer with 6-inch pumps until Sunday, May 30. Subsequent to these efforts, Governor Blagojevich included Mount Prospect in a disaster area proclamation that stretched along the Des Plaines River floodplain from the Village of Gurnee near the Wisconsin border to the City of Des Plaines. This proclamation opened the door for the possibility to obtain federal funding to offset local flood-related expenditures. Public Works staff submitted a cost estimate to Illinois Emergency Management Agency officials in an effort to obtain a share of any available aid. Unfortunately, the federal government has declined to make funds available; reportedly citing insufficient damage costs to justify federal intervention. As of this date, the State of Illinois has also declined to share in any local costs. Consequently, the Village of Mount Prospect and the City of Prospect Heights must bear the full burden of flood-preparedness and disaster avoidance expenditures associated with the May 2004 Des Plaines River crest. A complete estimated schedule of costs incurred by the ViHage of Mount Prospect and the City of Prospect Heights is listed in Attachment A. Problem Statements 1, Most of the expenditures, including direct overtime, contractual services, and commodity purchases were extraordinary and unbudgeted, These expenditures were authorized under the emergency powers of the Village Manager. Pursuant to Village policy, this action requires ratification by the Village Board. 2. A few of the contractual services and commodity procurements exceeded $10,000, Pursuant to Village policy, Village Board affirmation of the decision to waive the bidding process is necessary. These procurements include: Vendor Roger Meyer Trucking ARC Disposal Meyer Materials S & S Bag Purpose Cartage Disposal Sand Sandbags Expenditure $15,897.54 $48,049.48 $12,691.73 $11,000.00 3. The sandbag retaining wall and storm sewer dewatering operations were conducted by both the Village of Mount Prospect and the City of Prospect Heights to the benefit of both communities. A methodology must be established and endorsed to allocate the costs incurred in a manner equitable to both communities. Page 3 of 3 May 2004 Des Plaines River Flooding Costs July 1, 2004 Discussion Staff submits that all expenditures were necessary, appropriate, and made during a dire emergency. Staff also submits that all procurements were properly made under Village Manager's emergency powers authority. Consequently, staff respectfully suggests that ratification of expenditures and bid waivers (items 1 and 2 above) are "housekeeping" matters for the Village Board's consideration. Staff also recognizes that certain "soft" costs, such as direct overtime and direct (owned) equipment charges are eligible for consideration in federal or state aid programs but are probably not germane to the equitable allocation of costs between the Village and the City of Prospect Heights. Consequently, staff submits the revised cost schedule in Attachment B, which identifies only direct, out-of-pocket expenses that should be shared by both communities. Staff also proposes that approximately two-thirds (67%) of the total combined costs from Attachment B should be borne by the Vii/age with the remainder (33%) paid by the City of Prospect Heights. This allocation corresponds to the actual lineal footage of retaining wall constructed within each community's corporate limits. 745 feet of the 2,295-foot (33%) wali was in Prospect Heights. 1,150 feet of the wall was in Mount Prospect (67%). Staff met with representatives from the City of Prospect Heights to discuss a variety of alternative allocations including popuJation affected, property values, volume of sandbags, etc. Both staffs agreed that an allocation related to the lineal footage of retaining was the most direct and simple method of distributing costs. Utilizing this allocation, the Village would be responsible for $91,185.56 of the $136,098 expended. The City of Prospect Heights would be responsible for $44,912.44. The net effect would be that the City of Prospect Heights owes the Village of Mount Prospect $7,596.44. Recommendations Staff recommends that the Village Board ratify the Village Manager's procurement of emergency services and commodities related to the flood preparedness and disaster avoidance efforts conducted along the Des Plaines River during the week of May 23, 2004. Staff also recommends that the Village Board ratify the Village Manager's decision to waive the bidding process and procure goods and services valued in excess of $10,000 in order to sustain flood preparedness and disaster avoidance efforts conducted along the Des Plaines River during the week of May 23, 2004. Finally, staff recommends that the Village Board sanction a cost allocation that assigns responsibility for two-thirds (67%) of direct, out-of-pocket expenses to the Village and the remainder (33 %) to the City of Prospect H~ Cc: Director of Public Works Glen R. Andler SPDlspd C:\STORM\DP FLOOD 04 MEMO TO VB.doc Sean P. Dorsey ATTACHMENT A Village of Mount Prospect Des Plaines River Flood Mitigation Cost Estimate MayqO4 ...... .. ..... ........... ........ . . . ........... .......... ...... .... .... ............. .... ... .. . . ...... Total . . Activity . Cost Estimate Direct Overtime labor (PW, Police, and Fire) $66,845 Mutual Aid Direct Labor $14,000 Direct Equipment $42,985 Food : $900 Cartage of Sand and Materials $28,836 Disposal of SandbaQs (w/sand) $53,049 Rented Equipment (Sandbag Machine, lights, Toilets. Barricades, Pallets, Tent, Tables, Etc.) $21,017 Purchased Materials (Sand, Sandbags, Pre-filled Sandbaas, VisQuene, Etc.) $34,868 Total Mount Propsect Cost Estimate: $262,50°1 City of Prospect Heights Des Plaines River Flood Mitigation Cost Estimate May-O4 . ...... ... ............"""".". .. ....... ..... .......................... . .... .... ...... .. Total / . Activity. . Cost Estimate Direct Overtime Labor (PW, Police, and Fire) $43,015 Direct Eaui Dment $28,498 Food $2,572 Cartage of Sand and Materials $1,400 Rented Equipment (SandbaQ Machine, Lights, Toilets, Barricades, Pallets, Tent, Tables, Etc.) $18.397 Purchased MaterialsCSand, SandbaQs, Pre.filled SandbaQs, Gloves, Etc.) $17,519 Total Prospect Heights Cost Estimate: $111,401 ...".............. .. ..."..."."........1"otaIMøuniÞI'ospëct & Prospect Heíght$ Cost EsÙmate;~~~~ . ... .... ........ .$373,9Ó1 SPD/spd C:\SEWERS\FLOOD\IEMA DET AILXLS Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT B Village of Mount Prospect Des Plaines River Flood Mitigation Cost Estimate May~04 //~............ddd..............................~.............................................................................dd.......................................................d..................fdtãtd / ..../ ./d ............................ .... .... ................. ........ .A(;t~,,¡ty ....... . .................. ...... ...... ..... ....... ....... ... ... .... .d.d.. ................. .... .......P9~tF~tÍi'I'I~~~// $121 $24,835 $48.049 $5.040 $20,737 Total Mount Propsect Cost Estimate: $98,782 City of Prospect Heights Des Plaines River Flood Mitigation Cost Estimate May-O4 ............................................................ddd............................................................. .........................d.............................................~.........................../............. .......................tðtåf ......................... ....... ... ....../.......................................d.......... ........d................. .... ................................. .............Aç~¡';,lJ~Y.... ... ... ....................................... ........... ... ..~ ... ................. ......./...................................d...................çp~Jç$timM~~ $1,400 $18,397 $17,519 Total Prospect Heights Cost Estimate: $31,316 ~()tallVl()LJl1t~r()~ê~cî~ ~rø~êø:çtfi~i~ ~tsç()~t~~~.im ~te:.d~13~~O.. 9..... .~... SPDlspd C:\SEWERS\FLOOD\IEMA DETAIL.XLS Page 1 of 1 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~~ ,,\r..\oi FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE DATE: JUNE 28, 2004 SUBJECT: ACTUARIAL SERVICES PURPOSE: To present a recommendation that Timothy W. Sharpe, Actuary be retained to prepare the actuarial valuations for the Police and Firefighter Pension Funds as of January 1, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. BACKGROUND: Each year, the Village has an enrolled actuary prepare actuarial valuations of the Police and Firefighters Pension Funds. The valuations provide infonnation about our two pension plans that must be disclosed in the Village's comprehensive annual financial report The studies also determine the employer contributions that are needed to properly fund the plan. The Village last sent out an RFP for actuary services in June 1999. At that time, the Village solicited proposals from three actuaries to perform actuarial valuations on the two pension funds as of January 1,2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003. The Board accepted the proposal from Timothy W. Sharpe, which submitted the lowest total fee quotation at $14,400 for the four years. Goldstein charged $20,000 for the same period while the third actuary, Hewitt Associates, did not respond. The Police and Firefighters' Pension Fund Boards have paid one-half of the actuarial fee in years past. DISCUSSION: On April 28, 2004 a Request for Proposal (RFP) was distributed to two actuarial firms that work with various Illinois municipalities. Those firms are Timothy W. Sharpe, Actuary and Goldstein and Associates. A copy of the RFP is attached for your review. The RFP we distributed requested fee quotations for the next four years, Typically, multi-year proposals are sought to allow for continuity in the valuations and in the case of changing actuaries, there is a significant amount of initial work that must be done in the first year. In years past, the Village had a full actuarial valuation perfonned every other year, with a "skipped-year" valuation update being done in between. In a full valuation, the actuary updates all infonnation, including employment data, salaries, and any pensions granted. With an actuarial valuation update, the actuary updates financial information only. There is no provision for new hires or any retirement or disability pensions granted. The RFP we prepared asked the actuaries to give fee quotations for both full valuations and updates. Actuarial Services June 28, 2004 Page 2 Following is a summary of the proposals that were submitted in response to the Village's Request for Proposal: Fun Valuations Each Year ! Actuary 2004 ! 2005 2006 2007 Total ¡Goldstein & Assoc. $5,000 i $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $20,000 ! Timothy Sharpe $4,000 i $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $16,000 Actuarial Updates in 2005 and 2007 Actuary 2004 ' 2005 2006 2007 Total Goldstein & Assoc. $5,000 $2,500 $5,000 $2,500 $15,000 Timothy Sharpe $4,000 $1,500 $4,000 $1,500 $11,000 As can be seen, the actuarial firm of Timothy W. Sharpe has submitted the lowest fee quotation under both scenarios. Timothy W. Sharpe has performed the annual valuation for the Village for the past five years and does extensive work with Illinois municipalities, representing over 150 police and firefighter pension funds. In addition, Mr. Sharpe does pension portability calculations as part of his annual fee. Goldstein and Associates charges $250 per calculation. Given the relatively low cost of a full valuation study and the number of retirements occurring every year, I recommend a fun valuation be done in each of the next four years. This will provide a more accurate picture of our pension obligations, and provide for more level employer contributions. When an employer uses skipped-year updates, it is quite common for the employer contribution requirements to fluctuate substantially in the years when a full valuation is done. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Village Board accept the proposal submitted by Timothy W. Sharpe, to provide actuarial services for a total four-year fee of$16,000. /. (¿:t (A l.//'<>4. DAVID O. ERB DIRECTOR OF FINANCE DOE! H:\ACCT\Actuarial\RFP Recommendation - 2004 thru 2007.doc RE VEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ACTUARIAL CONSULTING SERVICES I. Overview The Village of Mount Prospect has established both a police pension fund and a firefighters' pension fund for the Village's police and firefighters pursuant to Illinois Compiled Statutes (40 ILCS 5/3 and 5/4). The Village wishes to retain the services of a benefits consulting firm to perform the necessary actuarial services to prepare actuarial valuation reports as of January 1 for the years 2004-2007 for both funds. II. Scope of Project To serve as consulting actuary to the Village of Mount Prospect and be responsible for the preparation of the actuarial valuation reports for the years 2004-2007 for the Mount Prospect Police and Firefighters' Pension Funds. As of December 31, 2003, there were 82 active and 48 benefit recipients in the Police Pension Fund and 69 active and 53 benefit recipients in the Firefighters' Pension Fund. III. Project Tasks The selected actuary shall: 1. Give consultation and advisory services regarding actuarial assumptions. This includes determining the validity of current assumptions and, if either too conservative or too liberal, determination of appropriate conservative assumptions for actuarial valuation purposes. 2. Prepare an actuarial valuation report for each Fund as of January 1 for the years 2004- 2007. The reports shall include all information required to be disclosed by applicable GASB Statements. Also to be included is the required employer contribution amount as required by State Statute. The reports will be due no later than July 15 of each year. 3. Be willing to attend one meeting each of the Police and Firefighters' Pension Fund Board to review the actuarial assumptions and the results of the study. 4. Prepare pension portability calculations as requested by the Pension Funds. IV. Deoartment Contacts Prospective respondents who have any questions regarding this request for proposal may call or write: David O. Erb Director of Finance Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Telephone: (847) 392-6000 V. Submission of Proposals Three (3) copies of your proposal must be sent to and received by David O. Erb at the above address no later than 5:00 pm.. Mav 12. 2004. 1 VI. Prolect Costs The State ofIHinois requires Police and Firefighters' Pension Funds to have an actuarial valuation every year. Pension Fund's can choose to do an actuarial update every other year. The Village of Mount Prospect would like alternative fee quotations on receiving a full valuation and a "skipped- year" update for the years January 1,2005 and 2007. The Village of Mount Prospect requires that the proposal contain maximum fees which cover all the project tasks, out-of-pocket expenses, and any costs incurred in obtaining past actuarial information from the previous actuary. L Maximum fee for each year's study. 2, Fee for an updated "skipped-year" study for the period ending January 1,2005 and 2007 should the Village choose that option. 3. Fees for calculating any employee and/or employer liability under the new penSIon portability provision of the Pension Code 4. Fees should include any costs associated with telephone or written inquiries that the Village of the Pension Board's might have concerning the actuarial valuatíon reports over the next four years. VII. Firm Qualifications AU proposals should include background information. This information should include, but not be limited to: size of firm number of years in business computer capabilities resumes of personnel that would be assigned to this project listing of all Illinois pension fund clients, including the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of at least three references that could be contacted VIII, Information A copy of the latest actuarial valuation for the Police Pension Fund (Exhibit 1) and Firefighters' Pension Fund (Exhibit 2) is attached to this Request for Proposal. IX. Miscellaneous 1. The Village of Mount Prospect reserves the right to reject any or all proposals. 2. Any proposals received after 5:00 p.m.. May 12.2004 will be rejected. 3. The Village expects to award a contract no later than June 1,2004. 2 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER, MICHAEL E. JANONIS PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER TO: DATE: JUNE 29, 2004 SUBJECT: VILLAGE HALL INTERIOR SIGNAGE Staff has received a quotation from 2/90 Signs to provide interior signage and installation for the new Village Hall in the amount of $16,732.15. 2/90 Signs was recommended by Henricksen, the furniture vendor the Village is using. Each room in the Village Hall will be labeled and numbered, and each workstation will also be numbered. This package also includes directory signage for the first floor lobby areas and for each floor. In order to proceed with the order and installation to comply with the Village Hall move schedule, the Village Manager previously authorized the order to proceed. We are requesting Village Board authorization for the purchase in the amount of $16,732.15 for Village Hall interior signage and installation by 2/90. This authorization is requested due to time constraints related to the pending move into the new Village Hall. Please contact me if you have any questions. " /J[/"/lL)L'I'" 1\. I' .ili ft,." Ii ;"",1- ",¡ I ~\ ill. (. Æj) (~ " I to "- 'E-i v, I t1/J '" . ,~, Maura EI Metennani Public Information Officer H:\VILMWillage Hall\Vh interior signage memo.doc QUOTATION Manufacturer: 2/90 Sign Systems Project: Village of Mount Prospect- Village Hail Date: June 23,2004 REVISED: June 28,2004 June 29,2004 Quoted by: Doherty Associates/db Item Oty Part No. Description LIST Price Extended 1 44 4x9 Thin Sign Type I-A: Room ID 96.48 4,245.12 End Caps: SL-283 Insert #1: 2x9 283 Copy: PP 708 HMC 5/8" C Insert #2: 2x9 W 283 LP- White Copy: Arial 1/2" C Mount: A (Tape) 2 52 4x9 Thin Sign Type I-D: Room ID 96.48 5,016.96 End Caps: SL-283 Insert #1: 2x9 283 Copy: PP 708 HMC 5/8" C Insert #2: 2x9 W 283 LP- White Copy: Arial 1/2" C Mount: D (Screw) 3 7 4x9 Thin Sign Type 2-G: Workstation 67.68 473.76 End Caps: SL-283 Insert # 1: 2x9 283 Copy: VNL 708 HMC 5/8" C Insert #2: 2x9 W 283 LP-White Copy: Arial 1/2" C Mount: G (Freestanding) 4 31 4x9 Thin Sign Type 2-P: Workstation 67.68 2,098.08 End Caps: SL-283 Insert # 1: 2x9 283 Copy: VNL 708 HMC 5/8" C Insert #2: 2x9 W 283 LP-White Copy: Arial 1/2" C Mount: P (Panel) 5 12 8x6 Thin Sign Type 3-D: Restroom 126.24 1,514.88 End Caps: SL-283 Insert #1: 8x6 283 Copy: PP 708 HMC 4" & 5/8" C Mount: D (Screw) 1 NOTE: All prices are F.O.B. Origin (customer pays freight) subject to change without notice and are LIST prices unless otherwise noted. Tenns of Sale are subject to the June 30, 2002 Price Guide. QUOTATION Manufacturer: 2/90 Sign Systems Project: Village of Mount Prospect- Village Hall Date: June 23,2004 REVISED: June 28, 2004 June 29,2004 Quoted by: Doherty Associates/db Item Oty Part No. Description LIST Price Extended 6 1 3x9 Thin Sign Type 4-A: Directional 39.24 39.24 End Caps: SL-283 Insert #1: 283 Copy: VNL 708 HMC 1" & 5/8" C Mount: A (Tape) 7 9 3x9 Thin Sign Type 4-D: Directional 39.24 353.16 End Caps: SL-283 Insert #1: 283 Copy: VNL 708 HMC 1" & 5/8" C Mount: D (Screw) 8 6 3x9 Thin Sign Type 5-A: Restricted Entrance 39.24 235.44 End Caps: SL-283 Insert #1: 283 Copy: VNL 708 HMC 1-112" & 1/2" C Mount: A (Tape) 9 3 45x32 STD. Sign Type DIR 1: Building Directory 1,496.16 4,488.48 End Caps: SL- TREC 283 (l) Insert 4x32 283 Copy: VNL HMC 708 2" C (7) Inserts: 2x 16 283 Copy: VNL 708 HMC %" L & R (56) Inserts: 1 x 16 283 w/vinyl copy Copy: VNL 708 HMC W' L (see drawing) (10) Insert: lx16 Blank (1) Insert: lx32 283 BLANK Mount: HD Wall Mount 10 3 15x8.5 Thin Sign Type DIR-2: Floor Directory 118.22 354.66 End Caps: SL - 283 Insert #1: 2x8.5 283 Copy: VNL HMC 1" 708 C Insert #2: WSV 283 MAGNETIC Insert #3: lx8.5 Blank Mount: D (Screw) 2 NOTE: All prices are F.G.R Origin (customer paÿs freight) subject to change without notice and are LIST prices unless otherwise noted. Temls of Sale are subject to the June 30, 2002 Price Guide. QUOTATION Manufacturer: 2/90 Sign Systems Project: Village of Mount Prospect- Village Hall Date: June 23, 2004 REVISED: June 28, 2004 June 29, 2004 Quoted by: Doherty Associates/db Item Otv Part No. Description LIST Price Extended 11 20 9x9S0P+ Sign Type: StairweU ID 152.28 3,054.60 End Caps: SL-283 Insert: 283 Copy: PP HMC 708 (See drawing) Mount: A (Tape) 12 1 FWP+12x8.5 Sign Type: Directory within Elevator 63.24 63.24 End Caps: SL-283 Insert: 283 MAGNETIC Mount: A (Tape) 13 12 WSH Sign Type: Emergency Evacuation 127.46 1,529.52 End Caps: SL-283 Insert: 283 Mount: D (Screw) 14 2 WSH Sign Type: Occupancy 127.46 254.92 End Caps: SL-283 Insert: 283 Mount: D (Screw) 15 16 PL-400 Sign Type 6: Boardroom ID 27.77 444.32 CUSTOM HMC 4" x W' Anodized Bronze Mount: A (Tape) 16 17 PL-400 Sign Type: Financial Department ID 27.77 472.09 CUSTOM HMC 4" x W' Anodized Bronze Mount: A (Tape) 17 4 FSLD Sign Type 8: Light Duty Freestanding 344.79 1,379.16 Insert: WSV 283 MAGNETIC 3 NOTE: All prices are F.D.B. Origin (customer pays freight) subject to change without notice and are LIST prices unless otherwise noted. Terms of Sale are subject to the June 30, 2002 Price Guide. QUOTATIOIV Manufacturer: 2/90 Sign Systems Project: Village of Mount Prospect- Village Hall Date: June 23,2004 REVISED: June 28, 2004 June 29,2004 Quoted by: Doherty Associates/db Item Qty Part No. 18 1 18x 15Thin 19 14 PL500 Vinyl 20 6 4xlOGB 21 3xlOGB 5 Description LIST Price Extended 265.65 91042 93.60 72,00 26,528.30 13.264,15 13,264.15 125.00 3.343.00 $16,732.15 *Price includes installation of Exterior Building Directory and Community Center Directory. The actual directories are not included in this quotation and will be provided by others. 265.65 Sign Type: Trustees End Caps: SL 156 Bronze (1) 3x15 105 Anodized Bronze Copy: VNL 780 %" HMC C (Gold Dust Matte) (7) 2x 18 105 Anodized Bronze Copy: VNL 780 5/8" HMC C (Gold Dust Matte) (1) 1 x 18 105 Mount: D Sign Type: Exterior Vinyl on Glass HMC 708 5" 6.53 Sign Type: Glass Backer for 4x9SL 283 Mount: A (Tape) 15.60 4 NOTE: AU prices are F.D.B. Origin (customer pays freight) subject to change without notice and are LIST prices unless othclWise noted. Terms orSak are subject to the June 30, 2002 Price Guide. Sign Type: Glass Backer for 3x9SL 283 Mount: A (Tape) 14.40 TOTAL LIST LESS 50% SUBTOTAL NET FREIGHT INST ALLA nON TOTAL Village of Mount Prospect l\fount Prospect, Illinois INTERO FFI CE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS ~. )..J~ ., 110 oc.:¡. FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 28, 2004 SIDELIGHT PRIVACY DECALS AND DEPARTMENTAL LOGOS SUBJECT: As part of the overall internal building signage package it was determined that the sidelights of each office and conference room should have a frosted decal instead of any type of blinds. The decal would be applied in such a manner as to leave a clear edge around the perimeter of the frame for viewing and light transmission into the interior of the office areas, but still provide some privacy. Installation of blinds on all the sidelights would have been more expensive than this solution and the decals require no future maintenance. Also, there are several windows that allow light into the departments from the lobbies and as part of the internal signage it was determined that a decal with the new Village logo and the departmental name for general patron information should be utilized. The VBlage engaged Accessories Plus for a quote on the creation and installation of the sidelight decals and the logo/departmental decals for a total cost of $1 0,170. Accessories Plus was recommended and the quality of their work received strong endorsement. In order to proceed with the purchase and installation on a schedule that meets the move-in dates for the new Village Hall, staff previously authorized the order to proceed. At this point the staff is requesting Village Board authorization of a purchase previously approved by the Village Manager. Staff is recommending Village Board authorization of a purchase previously approved by the Village Manager in an amount not to exceed $10,170 for decal creation and installation by Accessories Plus. This purchase authorization is requested due to time constraints related to the pending move into the new Village Hall. Please contact me if you have any questions. ~:J~ David Strahl H:\VllM\Village Hall\FumitureWB Memo Sidelight Decals.doc 400 NORTH WELLS STREET CHICAGO, 1L.L.INOIS6D610 TEL 3122220020 fAX 3122229895 ~ PROJECT CONFIRMATIO SALES ORDE ACCESSOR!ES PLUS. INC. ATTENTION: David Strahl TEL: 8478392-6000 FAX: 847-392-6022 Sold To: Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Ptospect, ! L 60056 USA Ship To: NEW BUILDING Mount Prospect, I L 60056 Sales Order Number 600-18038 Sales Order Dati J un 11, 20C Page: 1 i Customer 10 ~ i VIMTPR Customer Contact David Strahl PO Number David Strahl Contact Teleohone 847-392-6000 l .. 1 Sales ReD Name Brian T. Walther Shipping Method Installation on Site ¡ Quantity Item Description Unit Price Extension 3.00 Sídelig hts A : frosted vinyl 6 5!8'W x 75 75.00 225,00 3/4"L fOf 2nd surface installation. 1.00 Sidelight C : Frosted vinyl 9 S!8'W )( 75 85.00 85,00 3/4"L fer 2nd surface. 36.00 Sidelight D: Frosted vinyl 19 5/8"W x 75 150.00 5,400.00 3/4"l for 2nd surface. 40.00 Instal! vinyl 2nd surface on sidelights. I 75,00 3,000.00 7.00 Glass panels with department names & 110.00 77000 LOGO. 7.00 Install vinyl names & 10gos. 1 st su rface on : 45.00 315.00 : glass. 1.00 Art charge / set up charge for LOGO & 375.00 375.00 proofs for review and approval. Subtotal 10,170.0 Sales Tax Freight 0.0 TOTAL ORDER AMOUNT 10.170.0' ,~9.::E'~O~9g 'ON/9r:Ol'lS/lt:Ol vOO~ 6<; 9 unl) ',; - " c