The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5. New Business 08/16/2011Village of Mount Prospect Pwspt Community Development Department MEMORANDUM ' TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JULY 29, 2011 SUBJECT: PZ -18 -11 1801 S. ELM STREET 1 CONDITIONAL USE (CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY) / SELLAS CONSTRUCTION — APPLICANT The Petitioner, Sellas Construction Inc., is seeking approval of a Conditional Use to construct a circular driveway for the property located at 801 S. Elm Street. The Petitioner is currently constructing a new single- family residence and proposes to construct a circular driveway in the exterior side yard. The Village Code requires Conditional Use approval for a circular driveway. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, July 28, 2011 and by a vote of 7 -0, recommended approval of a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the property at 801 S. Elm Street. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their August 16, 2011 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. Cooney, J ., AICP RTLANSPI -1.9& Zing C0N5ff&Z 201 L*U MemoalPZ -18 -1I 901 5. Elm St.(CU CGe W Diiv way).do MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -18 -11 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBER ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: 08 -13 -111 -001 -0000 Conditional Use (circular driveway) Richard Rogers, Chair William Beattie Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Theo Foggy Ronald Roberts Keith Youngquist None Consuelo Andrade, Development Review Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development Michael Munao Chairman Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:33p.m. Mr. Floros made a motion, seconded by Mr. Donnelly to approve the minutes of the May 26, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting; the minutes were approved 5 -0 with Mr. Roberts and Mr. Foggy abstaining. Chairman Rogers explained that the June 23, 2011 Planning & Zoning Meeting was continued to the July 28, 2011 meeting because Village Hall lost power due to a confirmed tornado that struck the Village. Chairman Rogers expressed his appreciation and gratitude towards the public servants of the community for their efforts with cleaning up the Village after the storm. Chairman Rogers introduced Case PZ- 18 -11, 801 S. Elm Street, at 7:35 p.m. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner for PZ -18 -11 requested Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a circular driveway for the property located at 801 S. Elm Street. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner is currently constructing a new single - family residence on the Subject Property and proposed to construct a circular driveway in the exterior side yard. The Village Code requires Conditional Use approval for a circular driveway. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner's site plan indicated the lot width measured 123 feet along Elm Street, which complied with the Village Code's minimum seventy -five (75) foot lot width requirement for circular driveway. Ms. Andrade stated the circular driveway was designed to, preserve the existing tree and would include a fifteen (15) foot turning radius and measured fourteen (14) at its narrowest point. The lot coverage in the exterior side yard would cover thirty (30) percent of the exterior yard, which is under the Village Code's maximum thirty -five (35) percent exterior side yard coverage limitation. Ms. Andrade referenced the following table: Hearing Date: July 28, 2011 801 S. Elm Street Sellas Construction July 13, 2011 Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -18 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 1 of 3 Ms. Andrade said the table compared the Petitioner's proposal to the Village's RX district bulk requirements. The circular driveway would comply with the Village's Zoning regulations. The house would comply with the minimum setback requirements and the overall lot coverage would not exceed the maximum thirty -five (35) percent permitted. Ms. Andrade stated the circular driveway_ would meet the minimum fifteen (15) foot turning radius and minimum twelve (12) foot driveway width. Ms. Andrade said the standards for Conditional Uses are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following is a summary of these findings: The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; And that adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets are provided. Ms. Andrade stated that it has been previous Village policy to support requests for circular driveways when the Subject Property fronts on an arterial street and/or the traffic volume is such that a circular driveway is necessary to resolve a safety conflict. However, recognizing that circular driveways are not always requested for a safety issue, but as part of a larger residential improvement project, the Village passed Ordinance #5547, on February 7, 2006, which set forth minimum requirements for circular driveways. The Petitioner's proposal for a circular driveway complies with the applicable zoning and the additional minimum requirements for a circular driveway. The Subject Property is in a neighborhood that currently consists of homes with circular driveways. The residential properties to the east and south of the Subject Property have circular driveways. Ms. Andrade said based on the analysis, Staff recommend that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the motion listed in the Staff Report. Chairman Rogers asked if the Petitioner was aware that the proposed circular driveway would need to be landscaped. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner was informed about landscaping and would be preserving the existing tree. The Petitioner was looking into the possibility of additional shrubs to screen the driveway. Chairman Rogers swore in Michael Munao, 801 S. Elm Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Munao stated the proposed circular driveway would make it easier for those visiting his house. He said the house is on an angle, Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -18 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 2 of 3 RX Single Family District Requirements Proposed Setbacks: Front 40' 40.01.' Exterior 25' 25.09' Interior 10' 10.12' Rear 30' 44.47' Lot Coverage: Exterior Yard 35% max 30% Overall 35% max 31% Minimum Lot Width for Circular Driveways 75= min 123' Turning Radius 15 min. 15' Minimum Driveway Width circular portion 12' min 14' Ms. Andrade said the table compared the Petitioner's proposal to the Village's RX district bulk requirements. The circular driveway would comply with the Village's Zoning regulations. The house would comply with the minimum setback requirements and the overall lot coverage would not exceed the maximum thirty -five (35) percent permitted. Ms. Andrade stated the circular driveway_ would meet the minimum fifteen (15) foot turning radius and minimum twelve (12) foot driveway width. Ms. Andrade said the standards for Conditional Uses are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following is a summary of these findings: The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; And that adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets are provided. Ms. Andrade stated that it has been previous Village policy to support requests for circular driveways when the Subject Property fronts on an arterial street and/or the traffic volume is such that a circular driveway is necessary to resolve a safety conflict. However, recognizing that circular driveways are not always requested for a safety issue, but as part of a larger residential improvement project, the Village passed Ordinance #5547, on February 7, 2006, which set forth minimum requirements for circular driveways. The Petitioner's proposal for a circular driveway complies with the applicable zoning and the additional minimum requirements for a circular driveway. The Subject Property is in a neighborhood that currently consists of homes with circular driveways. The residential properties to the east and south of the Subject Property have circular driveways. Ms. Andrade said based on the analysis, Staff recommend that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the motion listed in the Staff Report. Chairman Rogers asked if the Petitioner was aware that the proposed circular driveway would need to be landscaped. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner was informed about landscaping and would be preserving the existing tree. The Petitioner was looking into the possibility of additional shrubs to screen the driveway. Chairman Rogers swore in Michael Munao, 801 S. Elm Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Munao stated the proposed circular driveway would make it easier for those visiting his house. He said the house is on an angle, Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -18 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 2 of 3 people currently have to walk through the yard to access the front door. Mr. Munao stated the circular driveway would connect to the existing driveway. Mr..Floros asked if the previous home on the Subject Property was torn down. Mr. Munao confirmed that it was torn down approximately three (3) years ago. Chairman Rogers asked if there was anyone else in the audience to address this case. Hearing none, he closed the public portion of the case at 7:41 p.m. and brought the discussion back to the board. Mr. Youngquist made a motion, seconded by Mr. Foggy to approve a Conditional Use permit for a circular driveway for the residence at 801 S. Elm Street, Case No. PZ- 18 -11. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Donnelly, Floros, Foggy, Roberts, Youngquist, Rogers NAYS: None Motion was approved 7 -0. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. After hearing three (3) additional cases, Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Foggy to adjourn at 11 :15 p.m. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Ryan Kast, Community Development Administrative Assistant Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -18 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 3 of 3 i Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -18 -11 LOCATION: 801 S. Elm Street PETITIONER: Sellas Construction OWNERS: Michael Munao PARCEL #: 08 -13 -111 -001 -0000 LOT SIZE: 0.49 acres (21,738 square feet) ZONING: RX Single Family Residence LAND USE: Single Family Residential REQUEST: Conditional Use (circular driveway) LOCATION MAP Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM r"s FROM: DATE: BEARING DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER JULY 12, 2011 JULY 28, 2011 PZ -18 -11 / 801 S. ELM STREET / CONDITIONAL USE (CIRCULAR DRIVE) (SELLAS CONSTRUCTION) A public hearing has been scheduled for the July 28, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Sellas Construction Inc. (the "Petitioner ") regarding the property located at 801 S. Elm Street (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has requested Conditional Use approval to allow the construction. of a circular driveway. The P &Z hearing was properly noticed in the July 13, 2011 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is a corner lot located at the Elm Street and Lonnquist Boulevard intersection. The Subject Property is zoned RX Single Family Residence and is bordered by the Rl District to the north, and the RX District to the west, south, and east. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner is currently constructing a new single- family residence on the Subject Property, and proposes to construct a circular driveway in the exterior side yard. The Village Code requires Conditional Use approval for a circular driveway. The attached site plan shows the driveway will measure up to twenty two feet (22') wide and will connect to a `standard' sixteen foot (16') wide driveway as measured at the property line. The driveway would cover thirty percent (30 %) of the exterior yard and would comply with the Code's exterior side yard coverage limitation of thirty five (35 %). GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The house currently under construction and proposed circular driveway will comply with the Village Zoning regulations. The table below compares the Petitioner's proposal to the bulk requirements of the RX Single Family Residence district. •' PZ -18 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS Page 3 The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The circular drive is listed as a Conditional Use in Section 14.803.A of the Zoning Ordinance. The following list is a summary of these findings: • The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the. use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and • Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. It has been previous Village policy to support requests for circular driveways when the Subject Property fronts on an arterial street and/or the traffic volume is such that a circular driveway is necessary to resolve a safety conflict. However, recognizing that circular driveways are not always requested for a safety issue, but as part of a Iarger improvement project for a residential property, Ordinance 5547, passed on February 7 2006, set forth minimum requirements for circular driveways. This ordinance limits consideration of Conditional Use approval for circular driveways to lots that measure seventy five feet (75') or greater. Applicable zoning and the additional minimum requirements (Sec. 14.2215) listed below must also be met in order for consideration of Conditional Use approval: • The circular drive portion of the driveway shall have a minimum turning radius of fifteen feet (15'); • The circular drive portion of the driveway shall have a minimum width of twelve feet (12'); and The Petitioner's proposal for a circular driveway complies with the applicable zoning and the additional minimum requirements for a Conditional Use approval for a circular driveway. The proposed circular drive portion of the driveway measures a minimum of fourteen feet (14') wide and has a turning radius of fifteen feet (15'). Also, the lot coverage will not exceed the Code's lot coverage limitation of thirty five percent (35 %). The Subject Property is in a neighborhood that currently consists of homes with circular driveways. The residential properties to the east and south of the Subject Property have circular driveways. RX Single Family District Requirements Proposed Setbacks: Front 40' 40.01' Exterior 25' 25.09' Interior 10' 10.12' Rear 30' 44.47' Lot Coverage: Exterior Yard 35% max 30% Overall 35% max 31% Minimum Lot Width for Circular Driveways 75' min. 123' Turning Radius 15' min. 15' Minimum Driveway Width circular portion 12' min 14' CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS Page 3 The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The circular drive is listed as a Conditional Use in Section 14.803.A of the Zoning Ordinance. The following list is a summary of these findings: • The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the. use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and • Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. It has been previous Village policy to support requests for circular driveways when the Subject Property fronts on an arterial street and/or the traffic volume is such that a circular driveway is necessary to resolve a safety conflict. However, recognizing that circular driveways are not always requested for a safety issue, but as part of a Iarger improvement project for a residential property, Ordinance 5547, passed on February 7 2006, set forth minimum requirements for circular driveways. This ordinance limits consideration of Conditional Use approval for circular driveways to lots that measure seventy five feet (75') or greater. Applicable zoning and the additional minimum requirements (Sec. 14.2215) listed below must also be met in order for consideration of Conditional Use approval: • The circular drive portion of the driveway shall have a minimum turning radius of fifteen feet (15'); • The circular drive portion of the driveway shall have a minimum width of twelve feet (12'); and The Petitioner's proposal for a circular driveway complies with the applicable zoning and the additional minimum requirements for a Conditional Use approval for a circular driveway. The proposed circular drive portion of the driveway measures a minimum of fourteen feet (14') wide and has a turning radius of fifteen feet (15'). Also, the lot coverage will not exceed the Code's lot coverage limitation of thirty five percent (35 %). The Subject Property is in a neighborhood that currently consists of homes with circular driveways. The residential properties to the east and south of the Subject Property have circular driveways. PZ -18 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 RECONEMENDATION Page 4 The proposed circular driveway will not be harmful to the neighborhood character, does not violate. the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance, and will meet the minimum requirements listed for circular driveways (Sec. 14.2215). Based on the above analysis, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the following motion: "To approve a Conditional Use permit for a circular driveway for the residence at 801 S. Elm Street, Case No. PZ- 18 -11." The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William J. tooney, AICP Director of Community Development fitH.AFLAN1Plua"g &7-0PI.z COMM%P&Z2UlISStaffHepoju Z-IB -1I80t S.EZm SQCU-Cimtdu Drive).d= VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT — Planning Divisio, 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 r aj Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Zoning Request Application ZONING REQUEST (s): Conditional Use for ❑ Zoning Map Amendment: From to Ej ❑ Variation from Sec F- w a w aL C7 _z l O N ❑ Text Amendment: Section(s) (Office Only) ❑Other: • ^Village,l3oard Final SUMMARTY OF REQUESTED ACTION: e Case Number Telephone (day) P &Z - - f�G d >^, �p Development Name /Address Telephone (evening) zw Date of Submission o C 'Q Q. Q Hearing Date x C' ZONING REQUEST (s): Conditional Use for ❑ Zoning Map Amendment: From to Ej ❑ Variation from Sec F- w a w aL C7 _z l O N ❑ Text Amendment: Section(s) (Office Only) ❑Other: • ^Village,l3oard Final SUMMARTY OF REQUESTED ACTION: e Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.8I8.5328 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www,mountprospect.org 1 TDD 847.392.6064 Name Telephone (day) O rw f�G Corporation Telephone (evening) z Street Address Fax C 'Q Q. t //�� r f L! ....- tir 7S 0� S `// O Q C' State Zip Code Email W e t A d s j Sell" �c1175 Y �Yv ✓c io�� yhcY. /. Interest in Propei U � - Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.8I8.5328 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www,mountprospect.org 1 TDD 847.392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street,. Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 2 TDD 847.392.6064 ❑ Pro2eqy owner same as applicant Name T e lephone � m s (day) 0 Fr Corporation Te[ephone (evening) Total Building Sq. Ft. Z Cn G v p !s o Street Address Fax ca p. Use ! J tc Lity Co de Email Front 30 Rear 30 Side 7�5` Side ref Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street,. Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 2 TDD 847.392.6064 Address(es) (Street Number, Street) Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Standards for the Zoning Request Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary) � m �r Lot Area (Sq.Ft) Zoning District Total Building Sq. Ft. Z Cn Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed V d Use Setbacks: Front 30 Rear 30 Side 7�5` Side ref Q Building Height Lot Coverage ( %) Standard Parking Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces Adjacent Land Uses: North South East West f �} Property Index Numbers ): -- 3 - -- _ Q Q (attach additional sheets if necessary) w Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) C> —� 1 -v -7� -�J _ �7 faf t! Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street,. Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 2 TDD 847.392.6064 Proposed Use (as listed in the zoning district) Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Standards for the Zoning Request Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary) �r Z Cn V d Hours of Operation Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street,. Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 2 TDD 847.392.6064 w z Address(es) (Street Numb r, Street) C � 57 p Lot Area (Sq.ft) 73 3- Zoning District Total Building Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use c Setbacks: O 0- O Front Rear Side Side 0 Building Height Lot Coverage ( %) Standard Parking Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces z Developer �--yy�� Name �� 1 �'?l�� if/C . Telephone (day) (7,: :2 2 &Z 6 Fax ��a 6V 5 �� -753 C Email SP�t�ccf�� -7ru 6-7 Address C?S i2i f n ekc 3 o O ILI ire o ci D � o U a Attorney Name Telephone (day) Fax Email Address U Surveyor 1 m Name - �51� �3 n� fAPf /iirf. Telephone (day) C74 ,-- L Il6 Fax Email Address 00 1�t1'fYh B��.f'`..__ Engineer Name ��fi Address rn Telephone (day) Fax Email Architect Name uzk a&a 4i -L �� 5 `,1 Telephone (day) 672 cY 3W-6 1 =ax -25� Email - Address 1 y3 37 djrvYl 6 -o r O r r!, r _� Landscape Architect Name Telephone (day) Fax Email Address Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 3 TDD 847.392.6064 �A-I-% 1'1case note that the application will not be reviewed until this pctltloh has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Community Developmesat Deparimcnt's Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is. strongly suggested that ti ►e petitioner sc Mule nn appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed rut aceurat:y and completeness at the time ofsubtttittal. In consideration ol'the inthrmation epnmined in this petition as well s,% all tuppcuting dooaale MdOn, it is requcsled that approval be given to this. request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the pruperty. 7'Ihc petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inipcctioaa of the subjet;l properly. 1 hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in Wl materials submitted in nssecintion with this upplicutiun are true; and accurate to the best of y [ct Mgt; Applicant -- Date (signal, e) r Print Name A21ka- iramicant is not property owner: I hereeby duftnale lieu applicant to act as my agent fern• the purposc of seeking the zoning retluest (s) described in this application and the associated supporting materiakl. Property Owner (Sig store) 1 q a U gp S 5UL1A \ A� � of ett,n ° OF�n c.stOjetixp 8s SSa� °t4 p�mi 4 G be S3�i , ' Mount t'mspcct 13enartms:nt of t_'nmenunity Development 50 South Emerson Street. Mount Prosp=l Illinois www, mouttiprpspect. org Phona 847.818.5328 FaX 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 2/T :d 20 €9T:Ol :WQNJ d5T:b0 TT02 82 - Nnr Affidavit of Ownership COUNTY UP COO STATE Or- ILLINO 1 } 3 ,/" h A 6 , under 011th, state that i anz the sole ) an } owner of tic property an authorized o1Tia-r of they } ) r cummunly desnrihed as 0 [ f !� Ocitnf ec and that such property is own by z �C �tA C I as of this date. Signature Subscribed' and sworn to before ..��yACOBO 6fFJC► L 5tateo�ii t4 Y rCommisslon ExPites '201 a $ep%01" 28 Mount Prospect Dcpanntent orcAunmunity Devolopment . 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois wwwaountprospect.org 2.2:d 202202901,9T:01 Phone 947.918.5328 Fox 947.818.5329 1 l TDD 847.392.6064 :WONA dLT:t7O TT02- B2-Nnf me this - - .. . d:ty of f zu f U rins. anuu rropeny i ax. um prwiti tnftx tiumber (pi"i Volume code To Year (fame Cal Tcmthip BY 04101ill (Dn fim) 049. 116016 2010 (2011) ELK GROVE E'1 a L FfVa2m 0541M IF PAM LATE 964M1 - 415tDIA1 IF PAID LATE 9032PI1 .2.,561 .63 $ 2 599.54 $ -2,631-40 'CF R :X C =f3 LATE PENALTY tY THIS ML AT GOOK9011UPTREASURERX04 OR AT ANY CHfrAGQLWD. CtjAsE DARK is 1.5% K4 mam'4 ay STA'M- 1Aw- 2003%MTAL":TAX.. 801 S ELM ST MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 Property GlacgifiGalion 2-04 -207 0 tS71 jIiAATF- . 88 .7. X .SSA 2010 75T INSTALLMEW LJUE DATE APRUL 1 1 3 e-0 1 82 Dear Fellow Taxpayer, t he 110 201 Fir Installment Tax - 81H is due Friday, .L A 1, 20f A law recently passed by the fllinols Legislature changes the First tnstatiment due date for Tax Year ZGIG propany taxes (payable in 2011) to Apra 1, 24 I. This is a one-time change to the First Instaftent due date, which will revert back to Ni;; I for kdijre First Instafln Wilections. The Tax Year 2011 First Instafiment tax NO vAH be due March 1., 2012. Sincerely, I Aaria Pappas� Coak County Treaswer coj*countylreasurercoin 312.443.5100 �m MICHAEL A MUNAG '208 E HIAWATHA MT PAGWeCT IL 60056-3864 JUN-23-2011 TUE 04:43PN ID: PAGE:2 9 9 r INENCHMARKS LEGEND EASTINO PROPOSED W eENL1wMMt 0514 (PLw yLAOE DF NT. Pxp9ELr] - wr cADss "NET ewT W W HT T mCAM AT - + Y]0n 3fw xNI11EA1r l'dNFA DF CD1f PLAO A110 PdrDDL 511.11. 0 0411 m YNME O 1) 11R BEI]iflwFRx I1.0.LL) - PoY a' SAIeTARY YANxp1E `=AWD O 1]] ®m WIeQ[ Ar 24 xM11Yrz.v 65x[ wraEsr cImm CF fam BR B XAL D M47m - INYW7 ® 111pVw1 I ( xrAPXya It ADDRESS d AAIA`D� � em Em rxner YWNT PRD1PFCr, .rw m A PARCEL IDENTIFICATION KrAilrO Vru xr mIa NUMBER - far fOwS FIMI slur Fitz DWVAWAYPAWMEnSELTIUH - xm ro wlu DDwapwr xeTES� ALL 00YIS m 5m K 0[3Crm TIm— MC FRpf] W/CR nm w na RnOPERM, Ax0 wusr 019b1AR0E uwix 0' W ME FD4NIOA11011. AMO AT lEA9T f' TROY ,YIY PROPERTY HxE ` •`"' i M msiX pMxwar rtxrveA]tM x g PF1Ttn1N wM 500. ]wx Me niA¢ OWr t€ WAV wµ1 ....w.....,... ... .,.tea.,........., y { n DETAILED GRADING PLAN Icw oesrluPnax mi ]? Ix pWx2xSr LTi1r4TEa eL]N0 A aiBOTrPCx a PART DF LOr 16 DF 11E DNNB15 911owYM ei 9]:TDx t; 1DM96P 11 NpIM, RAIgE 11 E41r Di r1E 11RIq PRNLIPAL ME x L W"T PRQSPECr, fou x a C.& MAR�� I� qr xUx6m i WSIY0. Nl IM Ppw4PKWYieMI[w W IWKL wYK �[. mar¢vlolr r xe una 6 XOIw w 0. [ 4 R60tiK d1 � xir o6� �.,wA6 r�rxx � � f Xac xx..Y 0' f Y 1wW a+P p f00. 1 xxl J x I a;x .xamx { 4OT 34 iIW YaNlw •..., LOT 33 I I N0 - DE9w YAxLR 110 R SERTAIOx A M 46vAARACT OF puExgWx 9O0'µ1 HMM pR ACR]µ, pxns9 6 NDYE Wg W F0IA VW PL111 PWPMIEO BY OTHERS Nnm.. w. 5[AwK xDt]4 wArpr S[RwCE ro w TTPE x crnrm Yix. ofrM aY. 6 ie (y -D f+[w[b AV TMe xAei. lIE IdP Y p' TIE o-BOf -9NU. BE fallo4ID AY] BA(w]e.Tm. nIE TFAILx 4M 91A11 K Al rxam m nE FxgxC wrnq DEPµTr w, IF A SAOrfE Efafrs a ]x[ C ME 5X0014 We] eC IOI MID A 1r K U . RLPMR 01111P YU1T BE t15Ea F MD --N O 1M3 u5E0 ,,E 1HE SIY LqT AT Mf YAW 9101H8 e[ nuosm AW CFPPm. , 5BIN5E oust 9E —Ma Aw Yf nA x[Rwxm F TO PFirWP6x0 lxE ETOsnxo WUNNQ •IYm s�wtrs xDrF,: ME EYSnx0 1MtlTAAY mt.a 5]WA of IBLlASFD Mn TIE TAPE o io nc alanxD Nw1ax. [YSrxC,3FFx0E I TE11 awnnlr Tw],TC� c�ua Ir Yusr eE Bnumn cl0 rHE xfw wlstirslcnvl. IF ME EnsNw 9]Mf£ Is x VD01t MINIM A xEw'S M Yu6T K xly7µ YIM 4 Do11tt — TD 1HE Lvsw x Mm M. A raw "IAHV yTAYX., W - ro 8< e' P4E 50R aAE WN. SLOPC a 1.aDE LOA s�MUnav a wrna 01n s]wrulr scaxrts wAU a la. ro� ��r[R rx[ ewas u6xAx Ily]u4L umr LNTON mxmxc]w m1N YR6T wen 4ll msrxo ]xfls R9w m srARrew Fulslla]rnlw m oEnalex[ F Alm r sr]c]s oosr, No 0 CXCm V a xamm mm ro srAxT rc axsTR]ICrlox I'm UYEACRO No i,mN LOCA 410 mm ro AXV MsiRU011011, MI. .[u1 LL, T RAE[ 1- goo- di4 -D5Y! - [DSxxO 1pgPlapNC 91R1£Y RKaA xv CE9POTIX 9e1TEY LLG (]003 3 3e -ae61 LDI ARG .11.136 9 � d10.0E14 (]Oe) 1dP -90e1 LOT 25 GOLFHI)RST ESTATES LIT. PROSPECT, W ms PROPOSED GRADING PLAN [R.IYN CxEOOD IxIWEOr X0. 105 � Oe_61o1 DAM' 10-t W SHEET 1 OF 1 LEGEND LINE TYPES At 1m1Ax1E NAESru WE (� E �,,,,, �- -� —�•^ i%s wY:xl -OP -MAY W[ iWSW "w'ea'r a P.MrW rELVIrOxf uNC wt WE _ _ pEnERRME �c vALE rvnm[sru __�__�_ f>asTNC fASfwlr W[ ® flECwxGL AMOTai e0N -_ - -- eOLpNp sERMtlt wl[ - SECIAV WE FtECIRw VAVtr "__ - - --• ppAxrEx 6Epna1 LVK .MR m-c L r PolE - -- ---- aumR -aARRx xcriw LIVE —x —x— Exls»m PinCTL.E ([IRE) yyt� mAfi]c SpIINL LIA51 AAM IR PI �•A-- -O-- - NMINO FUd(WE( INf) O MARM D]N1ROL 80x —p —o— E�TMO PTNCRMf OW PARCEL IDENTIFICATION O -no Ell w WET WMORAk ® [lECrrnC SpV OW RT T'BTTT�R RACRM9 iRAC1f5 �WRfr ® 1L� �� — rv0.AL — lW uxorxTanw cMU ry F> xAKxglE —E— LNMLPoRNXq [LECMC �[ [IECmc w[r[N —1— IItEIwrA6M 1T1rTxpxE uG� PoLL {� rsrAWMp —p— GAS NNN Q [ uugal v wArER uAw r c we0 rRlc Nttsru � x— SAYIMY SCw[R a YRS�rpnu NpoP -� -.— smxN afxER R NNUUx ' sXxr wd ff MAIM wpsr —ww— MKAIE n /Mss ORAx1 ENFOan Pqp EMr N0. o[RxessEO MAre ® e II Im — MarMC calraw WE ® MA1ER YILx D. PulIW 'MrtR LM ABBREVIATIONS YJ OPWNNIpk NGp ro 1eI.4I CNSN16 TLV a WRe IXFYANON BID S/RMNILR mIRROI vuVE Lxrs1MC wxu n.pw ulc +TnWAR MT. s IXIVAr0 ® wO 'W'D w[LL ® PoBT RAICAICR YALx e/R E*T w O- u CU @urLCOEOE ® Mu-o a1P cpxalwArtp NErupK pro peRxessm punts _ O.E. MU�rv�T v =no WI � GAS YALK � EOpC P PAKNfNT mp cM vERR rr, iwwm rtooR ®C US VAK VALII IR R rylrum SECxIXI O RLL� xv -NW xNWtMC 1 oWpwws ma Pbxi wltvAlwC / mLNK WE Pr POxlr a rANGFNOY `II 7� y WN s E y P �1(LR�aA CONGR[1L RP[ sw _ $E" s10 So- a- In nP a N1NpATa1 »XUpwAU 1; Iro a wA�iL D wrul eASR ur, uwrr uswurr llsce aAT Pre NORM e CPp LR wANNAE N ca rr. n rNO xcnw i &sr 0 smin INLE, w Ms, O CLOSEM LU xAwaE m PPim LxM FaWMMII ®Cw 0.EAxWr rPx Roam 1 <Nu T:; swIn RRS TWxp RR vlxE SP SET BpN PP£ P nwpxpcc r PR x/n Om eOM•fY mAxRSE Pool (/PFIRIem+p pxluA Q Pwxp Rsx Ix La+rn[rc N4 /4 wEAwRW pAnA1 �� ROw WP4F (cuq /I4/! IvAnxA.1L0 pxl1A1 [OVA) 11411 MtptwxnW lASM MOY uELD FlR FOUFa IRaI Ppp - Ews i°w"° RNwaAp SOMME • rvX rpuxM PX xuL HATCHING aMACE . rv. PoLx • ^e WM'O wox BAR Asnutr nmor NaKACf fpuW BRA59aY1 ® wVIDNW ins ,sw+ sn uw NAA pALIW6IE SOPIAE£ 0 e P eEllxON PPE Bs1OOrAA1t 1YAIpt MEILWpSA1MS1 AfEA ® SECUW GOWER x pOPI LONNQU/ST BLIND. BENCHMARKS 1.) BDIa1XMN /n4 IRA stIlAOE Of wr. FRO�[CO - Wr CROSi w BOXX[T MOLT K NE NMIRMI LOOATW Al RE NaIMEASI ClWRR OT cOfT RNA AND S[HOOL SIR L FIEYArIaI - 6n.we 2) sm BFMDIwNW (T.&N.7 -Pots OF SANTMY w1 oa w ma AT za xanXDET W r1E sOwMrESr IXAMER Q Pea E111 smEEl, EIEXArIaI - eeaeT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LEGAL OESCRIP iED LOT ffi II N C ffiw U sr ESr me MA 4IRMIVRa1 R PMT pP wi 16 CI RE p' wl BUMpYSICX OF 5[CaI 13, rOMdxP a1M, I li IT CABI OF T" MwM rYN1CP11 Yfltlar.V, ACOCROxnp N - IT 11RIIE6 REGORGE[ AB M WTT W IT NUMBER IeS ALL M MC xLI,A4E 'T PApPECr. COIIXtt Mi WOK StAIE a' WXOfs GRAPHIC SCALE 1 M rTn ) l Iasi. n GENERAL NOTES I. Oa1PME ALL Pak15 R FN]D PRIOR W ANY Ca6'pNCA61 AxM RPLAr AN'! CH03PANMES To SURVEYOR AT GAGE. 2 TOR MWIIrIG PLST4CI s AE fStASlsrlfM nT LOCAI. am'NM[r3 ! NOT SNOXN NffE01l C LT TOIee L OCU uuNlpxAl AURIaxRES 1 W "T A r.,r p'Ilwvws fRal mw NAr, a c AVA.LE AI 1 - 000 BRI-O$w Pat P wWMM Ei LRnERpp D J WIM Neat ro M'Y apaxR pR pONSRWCeae 1 ME M — -E r1E OE6IR OX Ills -I MM 9� OF� ,. Mire m my A mO 0. uALrtlE4 Mp WPRpVR m s101W HERE B o W_ nlln x o nW/ KL tIMM J U ) g A RIL s m xum 1xXl m i w .x LLxXe Lmxm u n uLaem no p<X.o nr n . nwc Mo xvacr wwxsNUNRr +�. .• E L°°° m ° I��nL` K Sal�lu` R `iLnur:MOinl' AO ' YAAiOV ty apt! X-MN 16® MxPLxawl We 11R{1H+A6 xoY R4 Rde ¢90�lu MRnq w�/ fxl -oNxM e1R'pw.x( Axh � A.W{EY N/I4�T.B CLIENT m, as aNwEf!' ...- ,.,«..,,A.......,. IpB- Np -fqe) rwmlae.aaei PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ttrla -Iw -OM -0000 PROPERTY ADDRESS sDl LlE1 srwEEr YWXi PAOSPEn, IVWPS 1UW paAIUI CSTARS WXT NIp9P[pr, Wxas T, BASIS OF BEARING ' ASSUNW lOOOQIMNry wmy ORAx1 ENFOan Pqp EMr N0. SITE DATA u IIREh II.1M SWW FEET [AIM OB -R4-YF $ 1 . £ fJ1t Y . YC DP 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE (CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 801 SOUTH ELM STREET, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Sellas Construction, ( "Petitioner'), has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit for a circular driveway for property located at 801 South Elm Street ( "Property ") and legally described as: Lot 25 IN GOLFHURST ESTATES, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT 16 OF THE OWNER'S SUBDIVISION OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1652426, ALL IN THE VILLAGE MOUNT PROSPECT, COUNTY OF COOK, STATE OF ILLINOIS. Property Index Number: 08 -13- 111 - 001 -000; and WHEREAS, the "Petitioner' seeks a Conditional Use to construct a circular driveway as shown on the site plan dated and attached as Exhibit "A "; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit being the subject of PZ -18 -11 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28 day of July, 2011, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13 day of July, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ- 18 -11; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the request meet the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use for a circular driveway, attached as Exhibit 'A" would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant approval of a Conditional Use for a circular drive, all as shown on the site plan dated a copy of which is attached and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. Page 2/2 PZ -18 -11 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of, 2011. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H: \CLKO \WIN \ORDINANCE2 \C USEcirculardrive801SEImPZ1811Aug162011 .doc LEGEND LINE TYPES At 1m1Ax1E NAESru WE (� E �,,,,, �- -� —�•^ i%s wY:xl -OP -MAY W[ iWSW "w'ea'r a P.MrW rELVIrOxf uNC wt WE _ _ pEnERRME �c vALE rvnm[sru __�__�_ f>asTNC fASfwlr W[ ® flECwxGL AMOTai e0N -_ - -- eOLpNp sERMtlt wl[ - SECIAV WE FtECIRw VAVtr "__ - - --• ppAxrEx 6Epna1 LVK .MR m-c L r PolE - -- ---- aumR -aARRx xcriw LIVE —x —x— Exls»m PinCTL.E ([IRE) yyt� mAfi]c SpIINL LIA51 AAM IR PI �•A-- -O-- - NMINO FUd(WE( INf) O MARM D]N1ROL 80x —p —o— E�TMO PTNCRMf OW PARCEL IDENTIFICATION O -no Ell w WET WMORAk ® [lECrrnC SpV OW RT T'BTTT�R RACRM9 iRAC1f5 �WRfr ® 1L� �� — rv0.AL — lW uxorxTanw cMU ry F> xAKxglE —E— LNMLPoRNXq [LECMC �[ [IECmc w[r[N —1— IItEIwrA6M 1T1rTxpxE uG� PoLL {� rsrAWMp —p— GAS NNN Q [ uugal v wArER uAw r c we0 rRlc Nttsru � x— SAYIMY SCw[R a YRS�rpnu NpoP -� -.— smxN afxER R NNUUx ' sXxr wd ff MAIM wpsr —ww— MKAIE n /Mss ORAx1 ENFOan Pqp EMr N0. o[RxessEO MAre ® e II Im — MarMC calraw WE ® MA1ER YILx D. PulIW 'MrtR LM ABBREVIATIONS YJ OPWNNIpk NGp ro 1eI.4I CNSN16 TLV a WRe IXFYANON BID S/RMNILR mIRROI vuVE Lxrs1MC wxu n.pw ulc +TnWAR MT. s IXIVAr0 ® wO 'W'D w[LL ® PoBT RAICAICR YALx e/R E*T w O- u CU @urLCOEOE ® Mu-o a1P cpxalwArtp NErupK pro peRxessm punts _ O.E. MU�rv�T v =no WI � GAS YALK � EOpC P PAKNfNT mp cM vERR rr, iwwm rtooR ®C US VAK VALII IR R rylrum SECxIXI O RLL� xv -NW xNWtMC 1 oWpwws ma Pbxi wltvAlwC / mLNK WE Pr POxlr a rANGFNOY `II 7� y WN s E y P �1(LR�aA CONGR[1L RP[ sw _ $E" s10 So- a- In nP a N1NpATa1 »XUpwAU 1; Iro a wA�iL D wrul eASR ur, uwrr uswurr llsce aAT Pre NORM e CPp LR wANNAE N ca rr. n rNO xcnw i &sr 0 smin INLE, w Ms, O CLOSEM LU xAwaE m PPim LxM FaWMMII ®Cw 0.EAxWr rPx Roam 1 <Nu T:; swIn RRS TWxp RR vlxE SP SET BpN PP£ P nwpxpcc r PR x/n Om eOM•fY mAxRSE Pool (/PFIRIem+p pxluA Q Pwxp Rsx Ix La+rn[rc N4 /4 wEAwRW pAnA1 �� ROw WP4F (cuq /I4/! IvAnxA.1L0 pxl1A1 [OVA) 11411 MtptwxnW lASM MOY uELD FlR FOUFa IRaI Ppp - Ews i°w"° RNwaAp SOMME • rvX rpuxM PX xuL HATCHING aMACE . rv. PoLx • ^e WM'O wox BAR Asnutr nmor NaKACf fpuW BRA59aY1 ® wVIDNW ins ,sw+ sn uw NAA pALIW6IE SOPIAE£ 0 e P eEllxON PPE Bs1OOrAA1t 1YAIpt MEILWpSA1MS1 AfEA ® SECUW GOWER x pOPI LONNQU/ST BLIND. BENCHMARKS 1.) BDIa1XMN /n4 IRA stIlAOE Of wr. FRO�[CO - Wr CROSi w BOXX[T MOLT K NE NMIRMI LOOATW Al RE NaIMEASI ClWRR OT cOfT RNA AND S[HOOL SIR L FIEYArIaI - 6n.we 2) sm BFMDIwNW (T.&N.7 -Pots OF SANTMY w1 oa w ma AT za xanXDET W r1E sOwMrESr IXAMER Q Pea E111 smEEl, EIEXArIaI - eeaeT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LEGAL OESCRIP iED LOT ffi II N C ffiw U sr ESr me MA 4IRMIVRa1 R PMT pP wi 16 CI RE p' wl BUMpYSICX OF 5[CaI 13, rOMdxP a1M, I li IT CABI OF T" MwM rYN1CP11 Yfltlar.V, ACOCROxnp N - IT 11RIIE6 REGORGE[ AB M WTT W IT NUMBER IeS ALL M MC xLI,A4E 'T PApPECr. COIIXtt Mi WOK StAIE a' WXOfs GRAPHIC SCALE 1 M rTn ) l Iasi. n GENERAL NOTES I. Oa1PME ALL Pak15 R FN]D PRIOR W ANY Ca6'pNCA61 AxM RPLAr AN'! CH03PANMES To SURVEYOR AT GAGE. 2 TOR MWIIrIG PLST4CI s AE fStASlsrlfM nT LOCAI. am'NM[r3 ! NOT SNOXN NffE01l C LT TOIee L OCU uuNlpxAl AURIaxRES 1 W "T A r.,r p'Ilwvws fRal mw NAr, a c AVA.LE AI 1 - 000 BRI-O$w Pat P wWMM Ei LRnERpp D J WIM Neat ro M'Y apaxR pR pONSRWCeae 1 ME M — -E r1E OE6IR OX Ills -I MM 9� OF� ,. Mire m my A mO 0. uALrtlE4 Mp WPRpVR m s101W HERE B o W_ nlln x o nW/ KL tIMM J U ) g A RIL s m xum 1xXl m i w .x LLxXe Lmxm u n uLaem no p<X.o nr n . nwc Mo xvacr wwxsNUNRr +�. .• E L°°° m ° I��nL` K Sal�lu` R `iLnur:MOinl' AO ' YAAiOV ty apt! X-MN 16® MxPLxawl We 11R{1H+A6 xoY R4 Rde ¢90�lu MRnq w�/ fxl -oNxM e1R'pw.x( Axh � A.W{EY N/I4�T.B CLIENT m, as aNwEf!' ...- ,.,«..,,A.......,. IpB- Np -fqe) rwmlae.aaei PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ttrla -Iw -OM -0000 PROPERTY ADDRESS sDl LlE1 srwEEr YWXi PAOSPEn, IVWPS 1UW paAIUI CSTARS WXT NIp9P[pr, Wxas T, BASIS OF BEARING ' ASSUNW lOOOQIMNry wmy ORAx1 ENFOan Pqp EMr N0. SITE DATA u IIREh II.1M SWW FEET [AIM OB -R4-YF $ 1 . £ fJ1t Y . YC DP 1 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM 1 1i TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JULY 29, 2011 SUBJECT: PZ- 16.11 1299 W. CENTRAL RD. I.CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE - THROUGH LANES) AND VARIATIONS (LIGHT STANDARDS) The petitioner is seeking approval of 1) a Conditional Use to construct a drive - through bank and 2) a Variation to allow light fixtures that are not full cutoff. The existing building, currently occupied by Little America restaurant, would be demolished and a new commercial. building for a Mount Prospect State Bank would be constructed. The new building will include three drive - through lanes on the east side of the building and requires Conditional Use approval for the drive - through lanes. In addition, the Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff. The proposed parking lot light poles match the light standards located in the Mount Prospect Downtown. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the requests on Thursday, July 28, 2011, and by a vote of 7 -0, recommended approval of 1) a Conditional Use to operate a drive - through bank, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. By a vote of 5 to 2, the Planning.and Zoning Commission recommended denial of 2) a Variation to allow light fixtures that are not full cutoff. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their August 16, 2011 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. �t "6t::' William Cooney, Jr , AICP RVLA"]=mg & Zoning COMW&Z 20111ME] M,..TZ, I6 -11 299 W. C.n1 Rd(CU & VARs).dm, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -16 -11 Hearing Date: July 28,201 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 299 W. Central Road PETITIONER: Mount Prospect State Bank (a branch of Glenview State Bank) PUBLICATION DATE: July 13, 2011 PIN NUMBERS: 08 -12 -100- 012 -0000 REQUESTS: 1) Conditional Use for a drive - through bank 2) Variation to increase height of fence 3) Variation to allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Rogers, Chair William Beattie Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Theo Foggy Ronald Roberts Keith Youngquist MEMBER ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Consuelo Andrade, Development Review Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED. PARTIES: Norman Kurtz, John Eilering, John Green, Adam Fishman Chairman Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:33p.m. Mr. Floros made a motion, seconded by Mr. Donnelly to approve the minutes of the May 26, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting; the minutes were approved 5 -0 with Mr. Roberts and Mr. Foggy abstaining. Chairman Rogers explained that the June 23, 2011 Planning & Zoning Meeting was continued to the July 28, 2011 meeting because Village Hall lost power due to a confirmed tornado that struck the Village. Chairman Rogers expressed his appreciation and gratitude towards the public servants of the community for their efforts with cleaning up the Village after the storm. After hearing three (3) previous cases, Chairman Rogers introduced Case PZ- 16 -11, 299 W. Central Road, at 10:47 p.m. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner for PZ -16 -11 requested a Conditional Use to construct a drive- through bank and Variations to increase the fence height and allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff for the property located at 299 W. Central Road. Ms. Andrade said the Subject Property is located on the corner of Elmhurst Avenue and Central Road and is zoned B5C Core Central Commercial. The B5 District surrounds the Subject Property on all four sides. Currently, the site is occupied by the Little America Restaurant. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner is proposing to demolish the existing building and construct a new commercial building for Mount Prospect State Bank. Per the Petitioner's site plan, access to the bank would be provided via the existing drives located on Elmhurst Avenue. The new building would include three (3) drive- through lanes on the east side of the building, which requires Conditional Use approval. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -16 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page I of 5 Ms. Andrade stated the bank would provide a total of twenty -four (24) parking spaces, which exceeds the Code's minimum requirement of fourteen (14) parking spaces. Ms. Andrade said per the elevation drawings, the building would be constructed out of brick veneer with cast stone along the base of the building. She showed a slide that depicted the north building elevation which would front Central Road. The south elevation would include the front entrance. Ms. Andrade stated the brick and cast stone would also make up the building's side elevations. As shown, the building would measure thirty -eight (38) feet in height. Ms. Andrade said the site plan indicated a fence along the east property line. The fence would be constructed of wood and include a lattice design. The posts would measure up to ten (10) feet and two (2) inches tall and the fence panels up to eight (8) feet tali, when the Village Code Iimits the height up to five (5) feet. The Petitioner was seeking Variation approval to allow a fence as submitted to Staff. Ms. Andrade stated the site plan also indicated seven (7) new parking lot light poles. The Petitioner's photometric plan indicated the proposed light levels would exceed the Village Code requirements. The Petitioner has not requested relief from the illumination levels and would be required to revise the photometric plan to comply with Code. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner would like to install light standards which are not full cutoff. The light standard required Variation approval. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner submitted a Iandscape plan that detailed the proposed plant materials and sizes. As currently drawn, the landscape plan required minor revisions. The Petitioner was not requesting relief from the Code's landscape requirements. Ms. Andrade said the standards for Conditional Uses are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following is a summary of these findings: that The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; And that adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets are provided. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner's request to construct a drive- through bank met the standards for a Conditional Use. The bank would not have a detrimental impact on the adjacent retail buildings and access to the bank would not change from the existing access points or traffic patterns. The use or value of the adjacent properties would not be impaired. The use as a bank complied with the Comprehensive Plan and would be constructed according to Village Code. Ms. Andrade said the standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. A summary of these findings include: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -16-11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 2 of 4 + Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character Ms. Andrade stated per Village Code, a five (5) foot tall fence is permitted along the side yard. The Petitioner requested Variation approval to allow a fence up to ten (10) feet and two (2) inches. The need for the additional height for privacy was not warranted and did not constitute a hardship per Village Code. The alleged hardship presented in this case is directly related to the property owner's own interest in the property and not by the zoning code. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner was seeking a Variation to allow non -full cutoff light fixtures. The. proposed parking lot light poles would provide consistency with the exiting lights in downtown; however it does not constitute a hardship necessary for approval of a Variation. Full cutoff fixtures can be installed that provide visual imagery to the development while complying with the Code requirements. Additionally, the Village has not supported this type of request since the requirement was added to the Code. Ms. Andrade stated based on the findings, Staff recommended that the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the Conditional Use for a drive- through bank and deny the Variations to increase the height of the fence and to allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff. The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision is final for the fence request. The Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use request and Variation request for non -full cutoff light fixtures. Chairman Rogers swore in Norman Kurtz, 32 W. Busse Avenue, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Kurtz introduced those who were in attendance on behalf of the Petitioner to discuss the Subject Case. Chairman Rogers swore in John Eilering, 302 S. Lancaster, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Eilering stated the purpose of the zoning case was so Mount Prospect State Bank could have a location with a drive- through facility. He discussed the need for the drive- through which the bank does not have at its current location, 20 E. Northwest Highway. Mr. Eilering said he has had discussions over time with the property owners who had stated their interest to retire and sell the property where the current Little America Restaurant is located. He discussed the background of the bank. Chairman Rogers swore in John Green from Groundwork, Ltd, 351 West Dundee Road, Buffalo Grove, Illinois. Mr. Green stated that he is the Planner and Landscape Architect working on the proposed project. He said that the Petitioner does not need the lights and would comply with the full cutoff lights as addressed in the Village Code. Mr. Green stated the proposed fence would be an architectural feature for the Subject Property. He said the fence is in two (2) segments and is not continuous. Mr. Green stated that the open area of the fence connects with the park that is adjacent to Capannari Ice Cream. He said the bank wanted to continue the pedestrian access flow in the Village's downtown area. Mr. Green discussed how the bank would be extending walkways on the Subject Property. He stated that if the fence Variation was not granted, the bank would have no issues with installing a five (5) foot fence. Mr. Floros asked Mr. Green if the pedestrian feel could be created with a fence smaller than ten (10) feet. Mr. Green said the fence is ten (10) feet because they wanted to break the horizontal line by bringing the posts up; the posts act as accent features. He stated the fence would be six (6) feet in one (1) style and then two (2) feet in another style; the fence opens more as it goes up. Mr. Green said that there would be ivy planted at the base of the fence to allow it to grow up. Mr. Floros confirmed that public could use the walkway between the proposed bank and Capannari Ice Cream to the east. Mr. Green stated that there would be access all the way to Central Road. There was discussion regarding the alley located east of the Subject Property. Mr. Green said that the alley would only be utilized behind the Mobile Print building. It was stated that only a couple of vehicles park presently in the alley. Mr. Green stated that he had to also design the pedestrian walkway to account for the electrical transformer station that is also to the east of the Subject Property. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -16 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 3 of 4 Chairman Rogers swore in Adam Fishman, 301 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Fishman stated that he owns the property and businesses directly west of the Subject Property. He said that he supports the proposed project, but did have concerns how his business would be affected during the construction phase. Mr. Fishman stated that he hoped the construction process would be minimized so it would not affect the patrons of his businesses from coming and going. Chairman Rogers said Mr. Fishman would need to work with the bank regarding the construction process. He stated that construction materials would be stored on the Subject Property with possibly some parking on EImhurst Avenue. Mr. Youngquist said that Elmhurst Avenue would not be closed, so the access should remain the same. Chairman Rogers asked if there was anyone else in the audience to address this case. Hearing none, he closed the public portion of the case at 11:08 p.m. and brought the discussion back to the board. Mr. Floros expressed his appreciation to the owners of Little America Restaurant and stated he was in support of the proposed project as a bank is a permitted use in the zoning district. Chairman Rogers concurred with Mr. Floros' statements. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Beattie to approve a Conditional Use to operate a bank with drive - through lanes, subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Report. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Donnelly, Floros, Foggy, Roberts, Youngquist, Rogers NAYS: None Motion was approved 7 -0. The Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use. Mr. Beattie made a motion, seconded by Mr. Youngquist to approve a Variation request to allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff, as shown on the attached exhibit. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Roberts, Floros NAYS: Beattie, Donnelly, Foggy, Youngquist, Rogers Motion was denied 5 -2. The Village Board's decision is final for the Variation request for non -full cutoff light fixtures. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Floros to approve a Variation request to increase the height of a fence to allow panels measuring eight (8) feet high and posts measuring ten (10) feet and two (2) inches high along the east property line. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Floros, Roberts, Youngquist NAYS: Donnelly, Foggy, Rogers Motion was approved 4 -3. The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision was final for the fence request. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Foggy to adjourn at 11:15 p.m. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Ryan Kast, Community Development Administrative Assistant Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 4 of 4 f Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ- 16 -11 LOCATION: 299 W. Central Road PETITIONER: Mount Prospect State Bank (a branch of Glenview State Bank) OWNER: Chicago Title Land Trust Company PARCEL #: 08 -12- 100 - 012 -0000 LOT SIZE: .79 acres (34,396 square feet) ZONING: B5C Core Central Commercial LAND USE: Restaurant REQUEST: 1) Conditional Use for a drive - through bank 2) Variation to increase height of fence 3) Variation to allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff LOCATION MAP R Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON FROM: CONSUELO ANDRADE, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER DATE: JULY 12, 2011 HEARING DATE: JULY 28, 2011 SUBJECT: PZ -16 -11 / 299 W. CENTRAL RD. / CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE- THROUGH BANK) & VARIATIONS (FENCE HEIGHT AND LIGHT STANDARDS) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the July 28, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Mount Prospect State Bank (the "Petitioner ") regarding the property located at 299 W. Central Road (the "Subject Property "). The Petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use to construct a drive- through bank. The P &Z hearing was properly noticed in the July 13, 2011 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property (currently occupied by Little America Restaurant) is located on the corner of Elmhurst Avenue and Central Road. The Subject Property is zoned B5C Core Central Commercial and is bordered by the B5 District on all four sides. The petitioner is proposing to demolish the existing restaurant building and construct a new commercial building for a Mount Prospect State Bank, a branch of Glenview State Bank. The new building will include three drive - through lanes :on the east side of the building and requires Conditional Use approval for the drive - through lanes. In addition, the Petitioner is seeking Variations to allow a fence with panels measuring eight (8) feet high and posts measuring ten (10) feet and two (2) inches high along the east property line. The project also includes light fixtures which are not full cutoff. The various elements of the proposal are outlined below: Site Layout - Per the Petitioner's site plan, access to the bank will be provided via the existing drives located on Elmhurst Avenue. The building would occupy the northern half of the Subject Property and the parking Iot would be located on the southern half. As shown, three drive - through lanes would be located along the east building elevation and would converge into one lane along the north building elevation. The site plan indicates a new screening fence along the east property line. As shown, the screening fence would be constructed of wood and include a lattice design. The posts would measure up to ten (10) feet and two inches (2) tall and the fence panels up to eight (8) feet tall, when the Village Code limits the height up to five (5) feet. The Petitioner seeks Variation approval to allow a fence with panels measuring eight (8) feet high and posts measuring ten (10) feet and two (2) inches high along the east property line. PZ -I6 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 3 As currently drawn, the site plan will be required to be revised to modify the width of a drive aisle to the south of the building to allow for additional foundation landscaping and to include necessary traffic markings /signs for safe circulation within the site. Paarkina — The Village Code requires three (3) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for a bank. The proposed 6,340 square foot bank requires nineteen (19) parking spaces. The Petitioner's proposal will meet the required parking spaces by providing a total of twenty four (24) parking spaces. As per the attached site plan, the parking spaces will be situated to the south of the building. The Village Code also requires four (4) stacking spaces for each drive through window. Since the Petitioner's proposal includes three drive- through windows, a total of twelve (12) stacking spaces are required. The proposal would provide twelve (12) stacking spaces. Building Desi —Per the attached building elevations, the building would be constructed out of brick veneer with cast stone along the base of the building. The building would measure thirty eight (38) feet in height, as measured to the top of the apex of the hip roof in the center. Lighting Plan - Per the site plan, seven (7) new parking lot lights will be installed. The Petitioner's photometric plan indicates light levels that exceed the Village Code requirements. The maximum parking lot illumination is shown as 3,09 foot candles when the Village Code limits parking lot lighting to a maximum of 2.4 foot candles. In addition the uniformity levels do not comply. Information for canopy Iighting was not provided and will be required to be submitted. The Petitioner has not requested relief from the lighting regulations and will be required to comply with the Village's lighting regulations. The fixture cutsheet for the proposed parking lot light poles indicates that the proposed design will not comply with the Village Code's requirement of full cutoff, flat lens, and angle of ninety degree (90 °). The Petitioner is requesting a Variation to allow the proposed fixture design. Landscaping - The attached landscape. plan details the proposed plant materials and sizes. As currently drawn, the landscape plan will be.required to be revised to include evergreen shrubs along the north building elevation and to include additional notes on the number and types of plantings as drawn on the plan. Signage — The attached plans illustrate the proposed signs for the bank. The sign proposal includes one monument sign at the northwest corner of the Subject Property and wall signs on the north and south building elevations. Additionally, there will be traffic control and directional signs. Directional sign number four is shown in the public right -of -way. The Petitioner will be required to relocate this sign to private property. The Petitioner has not requested relief from the sign regulations and will be required to comply with the Village sign regulations. A thorough review of the proposal will be performed as part of the building permit process. Additional comments may be generated at that time. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The Subject Property is zoned B5C Core Central Commercial, The B5C District does not have required building setbacks or maximum lot coverage regulations. Therefore, the existing and proposed building setbacks and lot coverage are considered conforming. The overall lot coverage will decrease from ninety eight (98) percent to eighty seven (87) percent. PZ -16 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS Page 4 The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section I4.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: • The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and • Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The petitioner's request to construct a drive - through bank meets the standards for a Conditional Use. The bank will not have a detrimental impact on the adjacent retail buildings and access to the bank will not change from the existing access points or traffic patterns. The use or value of the adjacent properties will not be impaired. The use as a bank complies with the Comprehensive Plan and will be constructed according to Village Codes. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: • Would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Per Village Code, a five (5) foot tall fence is permitted along the side yard. The Petitioner is requesting Variation approval to allow a fence up to ten (10) feet and two (2) inches. The need for the additional height for privacy is not warranted and does not constitute a hardship per Village Code. The alleged hardship presented in this case is directly related to the property owner's own interest in the property and not by the zoning code. There are no unique conditions on the property which would not exist elsewhere within the Village. The Petitioner proposes to install light fixtures that are not full cutoff light in the parking lot areas. As the Village Code requires all outdoor light fixtures to be full cutoff, the Petitioner is seeking approval of a Variation to allow non -full cutoff light fixtures. As designed, the proposed parking lot light poles would match the light poles located in the Mount Prospect downtown area. While Staff can appreciate the Petitioner's will to provide consistency with the exiting lights in downtown, it does not constitute a hardship necessary for approval of a Variation. Full cutoff fixtures can be installed that provide visual imagery to the development while complying with the Code requirements. Additionally, the Village has not supported this type of request since the requirement was added to the Code. PZ -16 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 RECOMMENDATION Page 5 Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motion: "To approve: 1. A Conditional Use to operate a bank with drive - through lanes, subject to the following conditions: a. Development of the site in general accordance with the plans prepared by Groundwork, Ltd. dated June 8, 2011. b. Development of the building in accordance with the elevations prepared by R. Manalang Architect dated June 8, 2011. c. Development of the site in general accordance with the landscape plan prepared by Groundwork, Ltd. dated June 8, 2011. d. Submittal of a revised photometric (lighting) plan that indicates the site will comply with Village Code requirements. e. Compliance will all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village Codes and regulations, which include but is not limited to installing automatic sprinklers and fire alarm, and signage that meet the Village Sign Code regulations. Based on the Staffs review of the proposed light fixture and fence, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the following motions: "To approve: A Variation request to allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff, as shown on the attached exhibit. 2. A Variation request to increase the height of a fence to allow panels measuring eight (8) feet high and posts measuring ten (10) feet and two (2) inches high along the east property line." The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision is final for the fence request. The Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use request and Variation for non -full cutoff light fixtures. I concur: - 11 e wll� I - Lf�,� William f. Cooney, Al Director of Community Development H:TLAN1P1"ng & Zoning COMMSP&Z 2011LSUffRepomTZ•16.11 299 W. Cenlml Rd. (CU Amo-Thmugh & VAR - Lights, Fenc Heigh[).de June 9, 2011 Village of Mount Prospect Community - Development Department 50 S. Emerson St. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Attn: Ms. Consuelo Andrade RE: Drive- through Conditional Use Request Mr. Bill Cooney Proposed Mount Prospect State Bank 299 W Central, Mount Prospect, IL GW #S113 Dear Ms. Andrade & Mr. Cooney: Enclosed you will find twenty (20) copies of each of the following items that you requested to be submitted for use for staff review for an upcoming Plan Commission Public Hearing for the above referenced Conditional Use. The site is currently zoned as B -5C (Core Central Commercial District) that includes the proposed hank as permitted use. This request is relative to the proposal to include a total of three (3) drive - through lanes. We understand that the Planning and Zoning Public Hearing meeting is tentatively scheduled for July 28, 2011. Items attached include: 1. Zoning Request (Conditional Else) App., (original & 20 copies), dated 06- 01 -11. 2. Aerial Area Location Map - (8.5x11), undated. 3. Preliminary Site Plan - (11x17 color), dated 06- 08 -11. 4. Preliminary Site Plan - (24x36 b /w), dated 06- 08 -11. 5. Preliminary Site & Zoning Information - (8.5x1'1), dated 06- 08 -11. 6. Plat of Survey - (24x36), dated 05- 13 -11. 7. Preliminary Building Floor Plans - (11x17), dated 06- 08 -11. 8. Preliminary Exterior Building Elevations - (11x17), dated 06- 08 -11. 9. Color Preliminary Landscape Site Plan - (11x17 color), dated 06- 08 -11. 10. Preliminary Landscape Plan - (24x36 b /w), dated 06- 08 -11. 11. Preliminary Engineering Plans - (24x36), dated 06- 08 -11. 11 Site Photometric Plan & exterior light cut sheets - (11x17), dated 06- 08 -11. 13. Ground Sign Elevations - (8.5x11, color), dated 06- 07 -11. 14. Traffic Report - (8.5x11), dated 05- 26 -11. 15. Standards for Conditional Use - (8.5x11), dated 06 -0811 As outlined in the application form, one (1) copy of each of the following items is also provided: 1. Affidavit of Ownership - dated 05- 06 -11. 2. Real Estate Sale Contract - dated 04 -05 -11. 3. Deed - dated 07- 09 -85. 4. Copy of paid receipt of the most recent tax bill. 5. A 'pdf file of all of the items listed above. GROUNDWORK, LTD, ARCHITECTS! PLANNER-9/ ENGINEEP5 351 WEST DUNDEE ROAD, SUITE A BUFFALO GROVE, ILLINOIS 60089 847.541.4151 FAXe47.541.40GG gworldtd Qsbtglobai.not www. groan dwo+idtd. co m The requested application fee for a Conditional Use in the amount of $250.00 is also enclosed. Once you and the staff have had a chance to review the packet, kindly advise of any comments or of any additional needs for submittal for the Planning & Zoning meeting. Please advise if and when it is appropriate to issue for the Public Notice and provide the name and address list, if you require or desire any other information, kindly contact our office directly and we will be pleased to gather it for you. Thank you. Very truly yours, GROUNDWORK, ltd. �. . hn P. Green, AIA/NCARB Cc: (Each with a pdf of the submittal packet) Mr. Norm Kurtz Mr, John Eilering Mr. John Diedrich Mr. Rey Manalang Mr. Ron Adams Mr. Rob Guarnaccio VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT — Planning Division 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 1 11 Zoning Request Application Is Z Case Number 4 P&Z - - H Development Name /Address 0 Corporation Corporation Telephone (evening) o A Branch of Glenview State Banat Date of Submission V Street Address A Hearing Date z 847.832.0480 ZONING REQUEST (s): ® Conditional Use for Drive- through facili ❑ Zoning Map Amendment: From to ❑ Variation from Sec. ❑ Text Amendment: Section(s) `(( Mee yI ❑Other: F � P & Z l~inal C31 ` r Villdge Board p mal a p SUMMARTY OF REQUESTED ACTION: z Z While a bank is a permitted use in the B -5C Zoning District, conditional N use approval is requested for a proposed two -lane drive-through facility plus one drive - through lane to provide ATM service. Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.8 i 8.532 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 1 TDD 847.392.6064 Name Telephone (clay) p E_ Prospect State Bank 847.832.0480 E_ Corporation Corporation Telephone (evening) o A Branch of Glenview State Banat V Street Address Fax 20 E� Northwest Highway 847.832.0480 A �C City State Zip Code Email a Mount Prospect II, 60055 jeilering @gsb.com C9 x Interest in. Property d Contract Purchaser Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.8 i 8.532 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 1 TDD 847.392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.Tnountprospect.org Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 ❑ Pro perty owner same as applicant Name Telephone (day) C z d Chicago Title Land Trust Company Lot Area (Sq.Ft) Zoning District Total Building Sq. Ft, Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed C Corporation As Trustee under Trust Agreement Telephone (evening) Dated 7/9/85 and Known as Trust No. 3471 -AH Z Street Address Fax Side (East) 0' required 299 W. Central Road O 11.77' existing City State Zip Code Email E_ Mount Prospect IL 60056 Standard Parking Spaces Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.Tnountprospect.org Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Addrems(es) (Street Number, Street) Bank, plus associated drive- through elements 299 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect,IL 60056 Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Standards for the Zoning Lot Area (Sq.Ft) Zoning District Total Building Sq. Ft, Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed 34,345 B -5C 5,316 (to be demolished) Use 5,316 (to be demolished Setbacks: Z Front 0' required Rear 0' required Side (East) 0' required Side (West) 0' required O 11.77' existing 141 (existing) 80' (existing) E_ Building Height Lot Coverage ( %) Standard Parking Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces 15.5% 57 3 Hours of Operation Adjacent Land Uses: lam - 7pm Monday- Friday 7am - 3pm Saturday Z North South East Service Business/ West service Business/ F Post Office Retail Business utility /Park Restaurant Property Index Number(s): 0 8 -- 1 2 -- 1 0 0 -- 0 1 2- 0 0 0 0 r (attach additional sheets if necessary) W Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) See Attached Note: Existing facility proposed to be demolished. Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.Tnountprospect.org Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Proposed Use (as listed in the zoning district) Bank, plus associated drive- through elements Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Standards for the Zoning Request Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary) A W Existing one -story (5,316 SF) building and existing parking lot to be demolished to C construct a new 6,340 SF(t) bank plus a total of 3 drive- through lanes. The bank is a permitted use in the existing zoning district and the bank needs to provide full and expected services for banking customers. This necessitates a "conditional use" Z O for the drive- through elements. H U Hours of Operation lam - 7pm Monday- Friday 7am - 3pm Saturday Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.Tnountprospect.org Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Fz �E W� az z o� d w o �a A d Z � Ov x � U d � Address(es) (Street Number, Street) 299 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Lot Area (Sq.ft) Zoning District Total Building Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed 34,345 B -5C 6,340 SF (_r) Use 6,344 SF (t) Setbacks: Front Rear Side (outside) Side (East) 22'(t) 95'(t) 5.5' min 43'(t) Building Height Lot Coverage ( %) Standard Packing Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces 25' (t) 18.5 23 2 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 3 TDD 847.392.6064 Developer Name Glenview State Bank Telephone (day) 84 7. 83 2 .0150 Address 800 Waukegan Road Fax 847.832.0150 Glenview, IL 60025 Email jdiedrich ®gsb.com Attorney Name Norman I. Kurtz, Ltd. Telephone (day) 847 - 577 - 8310 Address 32 W. Busse Avenue Fax Email 847- 577 -4216 nkurtz577@gmail.com Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Surveyor Name R.E. Allen and Associates, Ltd Telephone (day) Fax 847.223.0914 Address 31 S. Slusser Street Grayslake, IL 60030 Email Engineer Name Pearson, Brown & Associates Telephone (day) 847 -367 -6707 Address 185 W. Winchester Rd., Suite 205 Fax 847- 367 -2567 Libertyville, IL 60048 Email pba @pearsonbrown.com Attn.: Mr. Ron Ada Architect Name R. Manalalang Architects Telephone (day) 70 8- 7 85 -4697 Address 831 N. Dovington Court Fax 847- 756 -1176 Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 Email reyarchitect @sbcglobal.n Landscape Architect Name Groundwork, Ltd. Telephone (day) Fax 847-541-4151 847- 541 -4066 Address 3 51 W. Dundee Road, Suite A Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 -Email g Attn.: Mr. John. Green Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 3 TDD 847.392.6064 Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Community Development Department's Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of knowledge. ^ Applicant ( _ _ Date ! Print Name — John G. Eilering President, Mount Prospect State Bank, a Branch of Glenview State Bank If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as m agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application and the associated supporting mate 'al. Property Owner Date / / (si e) Print Name Chicago Title Land Trust Company As Trustee under Trust Agreement Dated 7/9/1985 and Known as Trust No. 3471 -AH Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org 4 TDD 847.392.5064 4 THAT PA O Mr LOT 1 DSD(� AS p�g NQ A T = NOS CORNBR OT SAID LOT 11 TTi0 S OUTH ALO NG THE MR LO Liam of i DD4M'A , '1� � MEMO OF SOW TH Bit' � ALO NG A W E TRW ® PTO TO TH SO ORRIMI Mph . ==a W 05.40 FM 70 TM MW X SiI�IT Wig Q L �1 XAiAH6 SAID w Lim TO AM TM NORTH LOVE OF SAID LOT 1: TTMBNCM< MW ALONG SAID lVOlrxH IM TO TIME POW OF ERGINIUM IN DOMPM iTA BUBDNMON Or D 'DU i D 8115m AND TIH�in 1N VoUN ' PC MWr 1N THE ■MW 1/8 OF Mf.'1' W 12, MINIM 41 NORM NAMi6B or s P IRK I UM P tl N AL• - R — ER (MM THAT PART OF TIE EAST 1/2 T'H1 XW (AS MMlAMMUM ALONG Trill NORM LBVE MILDM LYING NOR79!!C/SlMT OF ■ MM 141 FEAT OM MM AT IDOo AN41=) IV01lTMMUST AND PARAi3& V= Us MOMMY WM Of SAID ZbM ACACf MG TO PLAT OF SAID BUMBRATA SUIMVMON M1BGlSi' M IN TiM W= OF TIE IIDeIDT' M or TMTZW OP 0001 iO1ONTi. VMOX, ON APM 14, 1070 AS DOtO MW MUM= SBMW. Z CE NT RA L R Q I I a nnlvn- rinmuce W a� . �� ° �n •�— LEF, ALI, 4�IPIx ,N .T,IAT4ART4HLl >rll.n�xtxx ��- �y c onnPrnLnWSnn.Gmnml,Arhm + ,/� � � * NORhaW[STLGRNEROVSAIP LOI' I; TNL' NC II SY1VI11 Pl_NC lllx wlSl rINGOF SAN LOTI Q Z — AUISTANCE _!3 MPEET. hItiNTE A}TAI._AY.AL N6 THATlS PERPEM1 ALhIARTO 1E w£:iTLINLOP NAIV LOrI. AUISIANCe4w bTSIFCF L'tiIIINCE NURTIIE� GTExLTALO[N:A LNEW ATIS DRAWN PERPENIN[WLAR TOhlE 3UV31Poi :YICNI.Y LINEOPIpTI,AUISIANEE �' W I GY _ _ or :I TIII:NII nTAIU GAI.lrvvixAiIJI NAwn RYF:nRLY l LOTH'W45r t• W( 7 LIN[OPSAI_LOT l.0.NisIAN[l:oFSbJa FELT'tn Txi lxosiwESnxkTknSi LINx OP SAIo iC {IIH7 folYxl — — LOT I;hIENCENVRhI AL_NG 5<IIIEAT LINNh)hlEh � VIIPSIUkMTAlVBWV131_N � �� DENOTES Of BLULAIIN BNSSRAN_W[LL43 NLRN &xM1IMVN INA1VVdl YNOSYEFI 'IN1'HE VF -- _ - -_ — — STAWNG S£CIIUN I "IOwNSIIV9,NOR,II. MHGE I..—OI"IHETHIRO4HIN[SPAI,6IEAI— $PACE (114.7 I —MIIUT PANTVP 111lIW- 1'r'IIFNEOFIAS LIEA%VxEOALIHiGTIiti NURliI£INEUF —_— -- — I — �n EAx>NL 11.11NG NORI}IWWRI.l—LINE III FEL—IU15VNkOAT RIOILI ANQLEC7 NORfNF]1410.N_PARAiLFL wITHTHE SUUTHwESr un[ovsnlo HlALUTA[[Oxolnu TO � C) ^'I � R� ^p°4 PI. aT_ PSAIU_ S' SNRMTAEVBOM3[ IINRFGISTFRE OINTIIYr1vVICEOPf1IPXI .CISINAR4N `+ l a O ar �wlsal LIUpE A W'iWOIL[ , vuHYl.x£INOISQU nenu.la. l014AS UOCW.wcNl nunucRlR61 ¢ SFlussN A4l LO T ! I 4� mnRa.. C _ ¢ r�a I a L 1•: B i m.aa' i �T hx 0 W O E S o to m w 4.. inn MOUNT PROSPECT STATE BANK A Branch of Glenview State Bank 299 W Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois PRELIM SITE AND ZONING INFORMATION ZONING: Existing: Core Central Comm. District (Restaurant) Proposed: Core Central Comm. District (Bank, Drive -up, ATM) June-8,2011 GW #5113 B -5C B -5C PROPOSED USES: Permitted: Bank Conditional Else: Drive- through SURROUNDING ZONINGlUSES: North Central Comm. District B -5 Post Office South Core Central Comm. District B -5C Business East Core Central Comm. District B -5C Business /Utility /Park West Core Central Comm. District B -5C Business SITE AREA: Gross: 34,345 SF 0.7885 Acres F•aR•. Permitted: Not Limited NIA Proposed: 18.20% 6,250 SF LOT COVERAGE: Existing: Building 15.46% 5,311 SF Parking, paving, etc. 82.79% 28,434 SF Total Impervious 33,745 SF (98.25 %) Proposed Building 18.20% 6,250 SF Parking,paving, etc. 68.70% 23,595 SF Total Impervious 29,845 SF (86.90 %) SOFTSCAPE: Existing 600 SF ( 1.75 %) Proposed 4,500 SF (13.10 %) BUILDING HEIGHT: Allowable: Core Area Not Listed 80 . Basic B -5 Zoning 3 Stories 35' Proposed: 1 Story YARDS: Front Yards: Central Road Required: 0' Proposed: 23'+1- (To Bldg) S Elmhurst Avenue Required: 0' Proposed: 5' min. (To Bldg) Side (East): Required: 0' Proposed: 44'+/- (To Bldg) Rear (South): Required: 0' Proposed: 95' +1- (Min. to Bldg) PARKING: Required: (1500SFx3 11000) + (4840SFx4/1000) 24 spaces Drive -up stacking 12 stacking spaces Proposed: 24 spaces Drive -up stacking 12 stacking spaces NOTE: New areas, square footage & setbacks are rounded and may vary slightly in final plans GROUNDWORK, LTD. A?-CHITECT5/ PLANNERS/ ENGINEERS 35 1 WP5T DUNDEE ROAD, 5UrM A n BUFFALO GROVE, {LLINOi5 60089 � 8 nV 47.541.4151 FAX 847.54 1 .4066 gwordW @t, c tohaLmet www, grovndwor1dt4, com ALTA / ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY OF PARCEL 1: 1- PART 0: LOT 1 DESCRIBED a5 fOLLOMS, BEpNxI[.G al rNE FIpRMi , CdeL4R PM 2: EASEI,w FOR CONNION OPn l FOR T.0 SAND EGrFSS f,R THE 9E _ OF OF SND LOT I' TIENCE SOOTI. ALONG THE MESS S - OF SWD LOT I A DISTM'CS OF 216.0, FEET: M_5 EAST _. A IRIE THAT IS PERPENpCLRIR TO NE WEST INC OF MD LOT '. A DISTMCE PM EL 1 AS CRFATW W DOCIINtxI PECORDLN a5 WMIW N,UlD LP2a,5561 EESCFNDOO 50 F04DMS — PART OF LOT 1 M SE4DERATA SUDDMSIOx !N SEC110N 12. TOWNSHP 11 NORTH. OF fi., FEf1'. HENCE NORTNFISTF34Y AI.ONG A ME THAT IS DR Ni PEAPE%DIWWi TO T:E SWMWLSTTRLY -, OF LOT 1. A DYSrA CF 65.76 FEET: THENCE FIST ALONG A LINE TMT IS P/N CE 11. EIST OF Rff 11. -11:— NERpIS1. DESCRIBED IS sOLLO'M5: BEGINNNI6 AT A PgAT O:N THE WEST LINE OF 5ND LOT L 50.6 POINT DOW 22.0 FIEF MR OF ME S00THWE'r CIXa1ER DRAWN PERPENOICIIIAR TO T TEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1. A WNNCE OF 55.35 TOO TO THE WST WESTERLY CAS SINE ' SRO LOT 1: THENCE NORTH FONO SAD FAST ME 70 THE NORM LIME CF OF 5AIO LOT 1: TIERCE FIST ALQ A ME DRAWN PERFENpCxLAR TO 5 1 1 A CSTANCE 0 72.93 FEET: TIENA N)RTe!E6TERLY ALONG A ME DRAWN PERPEW',CUM TO THE SWIIRIESTERLY SAID LOT 1: THENCE MIST BONG SYO HORN LNE r0 NE PONS OF B-G NIN'G, IN DESIDERATA SlIBDT+190N OF aLOCN IN MSSIE AND W " RESDOOMSION IN NWNi PROSPECT IN THE WEST ME CF SAID LOT 1. A DISTIACE OF T,.49 FEET.: THENCE WEST 1L01.0 A LANE DRAWN PERPENDIWLM TO THE WEST uNE OF SNO LOT '. a DISTANCE OF 26.99 FEET; TNE1.•CE SGOTMESTtliLY ALONG A LINE NWi OF SEQION 53, Ttl, 11` 41 NORTH. PANGS 11 FAST CF Me NRRO %aNCIPAL LIERIOU I (ESCEPT i PPRT OF 1 UST HALF HEREOF (t6 xEA51 k— T N— NNe OF — DPAHN PER TO ME SCLTNHESTEIUY ME OF SFID LOT 1. A DKTANCE OF %550 FEET. NENCE MEST ALONG A ME DRAWN FERPENDM" TO NF HEST. :1NE OF 5W0 LOT 5, A ASTINCE aLOCK) LY,NG NORMIC SSEFILY OF A LINE 141 FEET (NE4511RED AT RS T AN C NORNEAST AND PARALLEL wN THE SOVDM'ST ME Of SAID DLOCN) /{CORONG ro P1,NT O° SNO DESIOFIMTA OF 60.0] FEET TO A POINT CN NF WEST uNE OF SAID LM I, SuD PW BEING 45.0 FEET NORTH OF Tile. SOUMWEST CM ER W IWO t T 1: TiTN� SOIM! ALGNC sAXI HEST HNE, 23.0 FEET TC SVfiCeASION rSf45'IFREO N lxC OFFICE a THE REGSrRAR OF — OF COON —LAITY. IWNgS. IN f ILL 14. 19 AS DOWNCNT NONEER 266396]. lHE Pp NI OF NEONNING, IN COOK CALNIY, THINGS. THE PRElY5F9 CONYCNLY MO AS 299 TFST CEHTRN. RON, NWM PROSPECT IL 60058 PARCEL Af6A 34.396 Sr. .NFwIT N..xr Central s Rood i •,..m,..n GN v Fti Na roJt• m� � � 04 40 - �w4y , `•` \\ 1 �p . 1 uYAxr cvxwNLn x ne 9ttD Fem .s 66eIAIDn rc •P.rw Gv..6o Tmc w9 mrsT mllow .s TRwrcF I.nR mLSr _ PKN w. awWL. sTarz ewc Ax ... .:¢ aWaIFR,LG •Nx a1 nR o u 'W 1P�61 aL.+R Az sxass9R mnra�umL�v vn 6nI. As rNLS LABEL x,I. -.Y lei aa6s of F .Pid.� o+mx ou m —or. Iis<ei ado'' - � RcuoFtt cao.Nr vslt..T. •. wNT+ a1m w GeTra Tmc xn.Nirc aONFNn _x :O rsA9h N4 IIVS NN OF WP uw F O6 ,na]I R 1S -ZD — [xuwncx aF M F.r�iw. xwx R xs w Ac00fm.nCE mix Fk' 9et I - R w a�xwN1�LY 4r[ u W W� oxQ p. ¢ L 1RI[ 6LRND5. Jwxr pm � F i9 s�. c*aI..T me zox �a .,r3xvu IAS — nws 11.s.• ?ae.IU Pr r.e�T . —T 11 I>aa�cv (T. 1PL£I {P W NNi v. GRAPk�C 9CAI8 IX ]TE 1 � m ii pAT WP a ue �..ra vw� �wwe ev. ve RE� Ai1.EN,wP wssoe..Tes, LTa swmoRs 3 5 »rte / :• $ F 1 � t� 1\ M � �• S: :g 4 x --N e Lot f $ �° ,E PARCEL r =P j is N E , C ,�, / ro x • F p. V ' k , '•:�:•'. ...a PARCEL 2 N awaor E Na roJt• m� � � 04 40 - �w4y , `•` \\ 1 �p . 1 uYAxr cvxwNLn x ne 9ttD Fem .s 66eIAIDn rc •P.rw Gv..6o Tmc w9 mrsT mllow .s TRwrcF I.nR mLSr _ PKN w. awWL. sTarz ewc Ax ... .:¢ aWaIFR,LG •Nx a1 nR o u 'W 1P�61 aL.+R Az sxass9R mnra�umL�v vn 6nI. As rNLS LABEL x,I. -.Y lei aa6s of F .Pid.� o+mx ou m —or. Iis<ei ado'' - � RcuoFtt cao.Nr vslt..T. •. wNT+ a1m w GeTra Tmc xn.Nirc aONFNn _x :O rsA9h N4 IIVS NN OF WP uw F O6 ,na]I R 1S -ZD — [xuwncx aF M F.r�iw. xwx R xs w Ac00fm.nCE mix Fk' 9et I - R w a�xwN1�LY 4r[ u W W� oxQ p. ¢ L 1RI[ 6LRND5. Jwxr pm � F i9 s�. c*aI..T me zox �a .,r3xvu IAS — nws 11.s.• ?ae.IU Pr r.e�T . —T 11 I>aa�cv (T. 1PL£I {P W NNi v. GRAPk�C 9CAI8 IX ]TE 1 � m ii pAT WP a ue �..ra vw� �wwe ev. ve RE� Ai1.EN,wP wssoe..Tes, LTa swmoRs 3 5 IpJ' -p' 11 -p" I6 -p" 60. -p" I6 -p" I'_p 33AVerage e_p. Q Z a. �O J W O i CL "- 29 _6 o olb! Q tq W M�MiM — CLCL I--- - - - - -- - z0. U O ■� � 11"!ks CY, o � Ills` LYJ o n I I _ ' 23' � IrS ■ -6" k d Floor Plan W G E S A -1 rI1AL Ni.� fL� G.RONII. QMae. a.te... .=f= = = .W =" - '°°'"'�� ~�� n NOI'�tl EiweAion - '8' Ciflllal ROBd • x ,. r I�Mllh� w�Y� �MMwwi ii�Y�. CNM1.k1y Y.b . L�Et.r Ooi.q B YyMMY K _ tNYnileer r...ur y 6!t EI6Y8tfoq - A" Elmhufst AVe1iu6 x_� . .wa C.Aak.tr_Ar fh*h N W O E s O za Z_ LLI s N J W c3 IL x m� a iN C Z o • 1 , E A -2 70 N W J a W Z_ W W m 0. r-d hW Wtl MdW 0M1w a O..mP"Rft*4 B _ . M -s nF� err M Wh -PWY J EaBt EleYatlOrt - "C" . n r Eq�y.- .Le"��MYr N W O E s z� N 8v � Z 1IGG S t ' E a [z� A -3 �8aAh EIwaUOn - 'D' Norlt�wMt Hwy. �. �. Landscape (alculations: lonl Slnxex M }Nsf laGllarquaµwex �,Tp s.l IxtlssayeMea hrnnpTa wf loal Sinncea0.egaANar UieDS.l WJrtyeA� drixixa tal r�ree� ® +} 3i5 nevWe3 � mgremrrm ®ISY BC44YW: vY} RovltlrE: a ,a v.kaARreea xxR0..artNm vauglWry;b SM1ade rneevp.ldtn: [.eryeen,raei PrvFk6 1 TW hd. x[ nLWx +yaY{PCgWreJarrfi}I,I[mtnogryli� ) SF,angees vrwFkd nTrtnPrwkek r twt4n51aWe Wq�ucea5Yl5orl LxtlwpxMax )x SIn�Ar NSd144ar <2 .6 RwldcE: 6) L•vp'[ur5Mx6a ®xnl %tyWarR W vradhJ: ;x 5 PRUNE r156UT0.ETNN n0.N WLL W RN K)0000 Donor col cEAIPa.[uolq PLANT MATERIALS LIST WA1lRpgppFTRfE WPAP(iuEOnLY) ' 'SngEDOEDBwu: MULLX �, �— �bltllEni WyLLnj SPADDEOEDGE BPTM'ICALh4ME O�ECIWPVSIq[ES caxMOrxune LiE COMMENT uusnrvcwxcxnnE I I II I I I ! OiAtt I I I IRIB Ial nON—._ IACORPOfwI[a5 v[x[fxTMV6NRfMM1 I I I I i.L,Ir�Wp6 .Ireema�rs"Meurneue' £wN*nNattMaP'C ,• ILLI °y I I I I 16��1[M1 I II I — 4cElXq M�aixmwrmx'SLyIN[' L[YIlxxanYEU,aY Lm I I j I I� I I I V' ^� DUI[0)I PYrus oAerpu xlrandartr [xa�wum Prx 3N Z 1 1 1 W I a f;x � j— #uap✓gen leNraEeTTS[ 6' ES ES CTION ELEVATION A, r Yr L lal.aaEp➢sg nr xnax..,: nxn wxxMUnxErgru a m zo a � (15CHEhip11C FENCE COGUHN DIACRpIA �— MlxrxxgaelTw' w �I x I� l_fwlc uN. ro rcaEm oEClwwusvlgMw R�,.,�,x asDNw+GnnA1wM crnw.•s.wE a,� _ N pv nunulea'(aMrl✓rc' ue<AMau:e.ux.cu,.xn LdtlsLrcSpv ae• y I� wnP.aYXrxv«aPxn.x� wnw+Xxo:em s ss•• J fvERLREfw SxxUxs !LI ) x nL LOM'Ll11LKlOf CPnrxA[IOxls {�� /M/ _ �uwlamv " �� h 'M4taK Ta.ura &wrxHhrl4xr Pr «eYrn �• Wda wNa j Pl5PDx518LEFORYfurvwLGVM1YrnIES r£nlAESrocavvu,fTx[��ruPUx ENmsunuccxuECrvwEeexonnmorxrrvauronro . W[V rOx PuE4xMLS UIDartwrtnrarcwLs f u IV1YL0 (ASIOxbvxlAerO(OYtlMCkCMG,rdvAPx [enINGIDRMwx,nuaP/fLr)y PWLIWEWYmFPEAVPYCndI ;MIDI5PL5rpxT101f£gIANY DnP.x.LL IFYwYtOMFYLRLIwxo IBW WTl xf1WFF11 I Ms eg x.s'LaGaN fposisauNPm Glaq CaC��E r4Y u1LRIALLPLYxMT, nLLV R➢aVSrMFx ISMPSrxCAFPoRYLpyY In[ was [w[µOlrl[(INBOx1DIIISrnLIAr-0X rALLF� rIx4COxwllOnTIx INE1Rl YNUbam[ OMMr/ cY{, yl £{f Ui(OxfixVCigIr,NVOLWLxIibiSO ry wxlL n> oumPxlxmaoxERUICL ,owleoulcPwew�srLOlw}rwla (anr Nemer«alllr'sMaxpW I.xrrxra rlvx�v.em�y pWl raarsnr M1alwMtl4an teW AedoDayly }WI. rrr! I �sR(oMDlnox � IAxPlwU rLarwXSEwrsrars��loslwlels llPRrlckruna .slw-nvaos,wvoLawMVlunYx — xmx a,cwmM,•txea,,,' rwnP,:aa,gcoxa. u.yama�n R[ srmLSTxc xlclrsro> tuEC 65C APEMn llwluonsn [mrtrxE•sraRPfmaallarwminPVCL P °'�"""axlµluxa. e.rrs,� o..�^anw,m» n n•oc I xlc�a�orxsPExIALLVIAxrm MAluwmnunr vLnaacROwnlwnlsncazEORLPwmxc, w �x� "0a ""w"'x"d'' u�i,smv suE.+lovuwrr. lutn vumevvosu'PErlµnnoonuu vtaxnnrsnmsaulmTOaEIxmMOUnrI (eswuEeenfw.vim Ga.. ,wwravay A, e,seam Iex NALEFPYIYC mj [MYI[x SOD,ISEmnµunlUxtlLPMWIi VASnw lxEwr6lPKnONExnnSw (Sxdm. ryyµrg551lyLwulxCM'PIEILLY L FdVxeCP'ttXTMDNnE4 )+ C w [I,Vw,VY£ES,In[CDxIWKlpx TlyLLplpweEw LIM1 ➢rar[nitti MULLxMf slwutl0EDT � E"1'y ""'t fon�sNCtivanu' YwdN[+IYMenep , "yoss � +r � rNOYroEb' Wtll•, MVESxxuWSxEMOVLLKNN CIVN7tlr3•nllr,', YnInARtlnnrmmLe 10 NIEB(wxE dxaM1M. PxpxrwJSws vkuy4YO ��sM1x nlrr ,•yy x•pb �� Ys LLruMal)s.nu,nNOInsYEnlons xECl ss nrraRrxEPrm rurruurlwcrrwsvaxnwlw MAV BEn[c6TA4Y OpNSUR (l�W1nICREMENOCOnsiICTTe[TKFN FYdTrltµppSpppTrplNEt ASt En' SxW10 [OnrOnMiprXEUpSTRECEnrmlriOx Or sawn,a,.IVA'w[q « ssraa xIH[Ugx(gVTM11r1WaT a>d�xgocsEa� ,•P,o i " IxCMSW V.x SialwaPT xEIOI[FG0.PRP1LCwrK Va T, ypLWniK ; PSP VPRAPPWIWLY<OntlRU[IEpTRL xLµEraxvRV,EfnN4 NLExISnxC VE[l,Y.nDIY rA BE+MESEAYEP. /gpxUPSFAY]f0[r bo 5rxeedeE WrdrmeJM�lr � site landscape Plan 9 vlurt SVALOW wSarx PLM[ • �r�fY�f4klNM1lc PRUNE r156UT0.ETNN n0.N WLL W RN s ' P3�'&74k1��"fY"E Donor col cEAIPa.[uolq � O WA1lRpgppFTRfE WPAP(iuEOnLY) ' 'SngEDOEDBwu: MULLX ORM TNV'CERAROVND WISIOEFOGE �bltllEni WyLLnj SPADDEOEDGE nxwlEOCxAOL _____ _ uusnrvcwxcxnnE R' DW. Y W" DEfPCVLl1YA,E0ARFA � H IACORPOfwI[a5 v[x[fxTMV6NRfMM1 [ ax coMPOS *Inro ewsnnesolL DECIDUOV T REES SREES MxnxL SOILMD[PURE (sEESPEUFlCnnaursl N.TS site landscape Plan 9 vlurt SVALOW wSarx PLM[ • �r�fY�f4klNM1lc PRVwc VTeVI xLlwxvnluxµlAxM )•vuuouowaMUn n Aw snucuuraxooirlswc nay s ' P3�'&74k1��"fY"E Nrt SncnxA,lwu7 - EY611NLSwxweH 6" CROUNOCOVER AND PERENNIALS N.rS DECIDUOUS AN D EVERCREEN SHRUBS .. - �.o EVERGREEN TREES a �bltllEni WyLLnj �l � H l � I` rrlEr� Lm I I a Egg EO ES A, r Yr L A M alt a m zo a e �.o EVERGREEN TREES a U) Z 0 0 Z d V z p W 2 W O E 5 IU C1 l'_ 1. .__ 1-n 1 1 r.. r rT I CATCH RMIN TYPE A Ta= ;,P,., R - R , ' A LE tl ........... . N W () E S 0 Z w LLI ui z 0 z LU z uj "W a. C2 y �N =�1 ACCESS DOOR CAST ALUMINUM SOLD ROOF WITH 6ARC45T3 LED SOURCE 96 WATTS, 4500K COLOR TEMPERATURE, IES TYPE III DISTRIBUTION STIPPLED ACRYLIC ACORN LENS DRIVER COMPARTMENT tr 0 M d J \ Q H � W d 0 a, O � I IL o '-' R � (f) n c W U Z m WATTAGE I 96 6ARC45T3 VOLTAGE 120 - 277 ]NISH HK i� 4" TO 3" D1A. TAPERED POLE .125 WALL THICKNESS 6063 -T6 STRUCTURAL GRADE ALUMINUM POLE WELDED FOR SINGLE UNIT CONSTRUCTION ACCESS DOOR SECURED WITH STAINLESS STEEL ALLEN HEAD SCREWS 11 1/2" DIA. BASE, .750 FLOOR THICKNESS 4 ANCHOR BOLTS AND ONE GROUND SCREW DAM REVISION cLIEH Mount Pros act Sta Bank D L L AQQ 299 West Central Road �_ PPROVA4 QATE CITY MI. Prospect STATE PESIGNER SALESPERSON C.als ane may as be tmCuretl, ccpiea GENERA! SIGNCCINTRACTQltS y SCA LE: Noted Q ATE: 0 6,07.201 1 SHIEETN 1 of3 "a INSERaTME RD. P.O. "X 108E n autha M,.a,w nwy be puwNUOlt.. _ —_ ..... B. I CONC. FILLED AUGERED FOUND, END VIEW DETAIL "A" ELEV. D/F ILLUM. DIR. SIGN • FAB'D. ALUM. CAB. w/.125" AL. FACES W/ ROUTED GRAPHICS. WHITE FLEX BACK UP & #33 RED VINYL APPLIED SYMBOLS, • PMS #425 DK GREY ENAMEL FNISH SIGN #5 SIDE SID SIGN #3 SIDE A SIDE B SIGN #6 7ZSII PE n SIDE 8 ..._....SIGN #k..... ......- ....... SIDE B DATE REVIS CLIENT Mount Pros State B ank ADDRES 299 W est Central Road CUSTOMER APPROVAL DATE CITY Mt, Prosp STATE IL DESIGNER JHS SALESPERSON — — TN44051grt IB Ih0IN19�e11�Upfi4b11N10A W9fk al pOYLE SIGNS ", INC. antl mar nol he reprotlueee, vvp�ad GENERAL SIGN CONTRACTORS weahlb;lad In unylachgn WUwRm9ao B35WwMan DRwc -ND. 12198 SCALE: N oted DATE: 06.07,2 S NEETNO. 2of3 2321NTER8TA]'ERD.P.QSOR10B8 63G543'J490 �.�__ COfisel11149m ondulhaA[00 alfWaf pf 7Re Campo .w..r__.____. ADOISON,IL 80101 .== Thuri,h. to ilJS tled9n mxy ba PurNmseA. M — FAB'O. AL. CAP/ TRIM CAMEO WHITE ENAMEL FINISH. SIGN #2 SIDE A CENTRAL ROAD Mt. Prospect State Bank r . .. .. ..... 299 West Central Road Mt. Prospect, fl. Sion Locations r--= b �" rarm+s wra Sl ri' #i3 �k� UWJI ID uj 0 q, .1 � 44 .......... DATE_ REVISION CLIENT Mount"ProspEct State ban Iff ID ADDRESS 299 West Central Road CUSTOMER APPROVAL DATE CITY mt, Prospect STATE IL SALESPERSON RC This d 1,. �.%'. GENERAL SIGN CONTRACTORS DRWG.�O. 12198 SCALE. Noted DATE: 06.07.2011 SHEET NO. 3 of 3 =1=11*12*20ioRD, P.0. �x 1� ..thW�Ign—yLp—h Submitted May 26, 2011 Prepared by: Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 600 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 Phone: (847)- 823 -0500 Fax: (847) - 823 -0520 1 Traffic Impact Study For Mount Prospect State Bank Mount Prospect, Illinois 1 Prepared for: Mount Prospect State Bank Branch of Glenview State Bank Submitted May 26, 2011 Prepared by: Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 600 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 Phone: (847)- 823 -0500 Fax: (847) - 823 -0520 Table of Contents Section Title _ Page Number Introduction......................... ......................... 1 LandUses .................................................................... ............................... 1 Transportation Network ...................... ............................... ..................... 2 Peak -Hour Trip Generation Rates and Volumes .............. ............................... 2 Intersection Capacity Analyses ......................................... ......................... ...... 4 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................ ............................... 5 List of Tables Table Number and Title _ Paae Number Table 1: Trip Generation Rates ....................................... ............................... 3 Table 2: Site Traffic Generation ...................................... ............................... 3 Table 3: Directional Distribution ...................................... ......:........................ 4 Table 4: Intersection Capacity Analysis — Site Related Movements for Existing, Total Traffic ................ ............................... 5 List of Exhibits Exhib Title Number LocationMap ................................................................... ............. ....... ........... 1 Existing Traffic Volumes . ................................ ............................... 2 Site Traffic Volumes .......................................................... ............................... 3 Total Traffic Volumes ........................................................... ............................4 Site Plan L J Trafc impact Stud x Page 1 of 5 Mount Prospect State Bank, Mount Prospect, IL Introduction ' Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. ( CBBEL) conducted a traffic impact study for the proposed Mount Prospect State Bank, located along Elmhurst Avenue between ' Central Road and U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway) in Mount Prospect, Illinois. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact the site would. have on the surrounding roadway network. The site is bounded by Central Road to the north, U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway) to the south, Elmhurst Avenue to the west and commercial, retail, and restaurant properties to the east. The existing land use at the site is a sit -down restaurant. The project location is illustrated in Exhibit 1. ' The following report summarizes CBBEL's findings and conclusions of the traffic impact of the proposed development. Land Uses ' CBBEL conducted field reconnaissance on May 10, 2011, of the roadway characteristics, traffic control, traffic patterns, and adjacent land uses. The existing conditions for the development site and surrounding facilities are described below. ' Existing Land Uses r The area surrounding the site consists primarily of commercial, retail and restaurant land uses. Currently, the site is occupied by the Little America restaurant which serves breakfast, lunch and dinner seven days a week. South of the restaurant is the Carpet One store. On the west side of Elmhurst Avenue is the Dog Play Day Care center, Surplus One and the Jake's Pizza restaurant. Proposed Land Use The existing Little America restaurant site will be redeveloped into the Mount Prospect State Bank. The proposed development will consist of a 6,340 square foot bank facility with two drive thru lanes and one ATM lane. Based on the site plan dated May 25, 2011, a total of 24 on -site parking spaces will be provided, with 2 of those being handicapped spaces. The available stacking space provides room for a minimum of four vehicles per drive thru lane. Construction of the facilities is expected to be completed in 2012. The bank's operating characteristics are listed below. • Lobby service from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday and 8:30 AM to 1:00 PM on Saturday. • Drive -up service 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Monday through Friday and 7:00 AM through 3:00 PM on Saturday. + Two drive thru lanes and one ATM lane will be provided. • Mount Prospect State Bank will be closed on Sunday, but the ATM will be available 24 hours, 7 days a week. CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD, PROJECT SITE CLIENT: MOUNT PROSPECT STATE BANK PROJECT NO. CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING LTD. 110229 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 600 BRANCH OF GLENVIEW STATE BANK DATE: CBRosemont, Ilfinols 60018 TITLE- 5/25/2011 ce471 823 -0500 LOCA11OIN MAP SHEET NO. EXHIBIT- i N. \AINNNTPROSPEGT \I102291Traf i!c \ExhlhlTS \E %H_I i10229.Gan n Traffic Impact Study Page 2 of 5 Mount Prospect State Bank, Mount Prospect, IL Transportation Network The proposed site is adjacent to Central Road on the north, U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway) on the south and Elmhurst Avenue on the west. The existing characteristics of these roadways are described below. Central Road is an east -west arterial roadway with a four -lane section. The posted speed limit on Central Road is 35 mph. Central Road is under the jurisdiction of the ' Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway) is a northwest - southeast arterial roadway with a four -lane section. U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway) parallels the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. The posted speed limit on U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway) is 30 mph. U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway) is under the jurisdiction of IDOT. Elmhurst Avenue is a two -lane road providing access to restaurants, commercial and retail properties. The posted speed limit is 20 mph. Elmhurst. Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect. At its intersections with both Central Road and U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Hwy) Elmhurst Avenue is under stop sign control. ' Signalized intersections are located in the vicinity of the site: Central Road /Northwest Highway /Prospect Avenue; IL Route 83 at Central Road and IL Route 83 at U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway). Existing Traffic Volumes Manual turning movement counts were conducted at the intersections of Central Road at Elmhurst Avenue and U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway) at Elmhurst Avenue. Traffic was counted during the hours of 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM on Tuesday May 10, 2011, and 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM on Saturday May 14,20 ' 11. The existing traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 2. The traffic count data is inclded in the Appendix. Proposed Site Access The proposed development will utilize the existing access points on Elmhurst Avenue. The north access point on Elmhurst Avenue will be modified from full ' access to an exit only access for the bank drive through. The south access point on Elmhurst Avenue will remain "full- access ". No access is contemplated from the ' proposed development site onto Central Road. ' Peak-Hour Trip Generation Rates and Volumes The following section describes the estimated trip ends generated by the proposed facilities and the procedures used to develop those estimates. The facility is anticipated to correspond to the ITE rate for Drive -in Bank land use (ITE land use number 912). Drive -in (drive thru) lanes are defined by the ITE as all lanes used for financial transactions, including ATM -only lanes. The development is 0 3 CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. N.T.S. CENTRAL ROAD [7101 (960) 910 10 1201 (15) 10 Q LV L{T 7 LJ a cc +fx�11� _ Uj 1 Ln 4 �o �u 0 0 Ln Ln y 4 820 (1145) [7851 10 (10) [101 1 p N " N Lf3 � u u v u LEGEND-. # # = A.M. PEAK # #) = P.M. PEAK # # I = SATURDAY PEAK L[) LY] f10a —� [980) (5 20 665 ti 10 — = FEWER THAN (7p5) [so,, 5 VEHICLES U •S• ROUy -E t4 (NOR TkWE CLIE MOUNT PROSPECT STATE BANK B CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERI LTO. B BRANCH OF GLENVIEW STATE BANK �ne Road, Suite soo s5�5 west IFi Rosemont,Illinoi860018 TITLE: (847) 823 -0500 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES N:NWCUNTPROSPECT \40224 \Traffic\ xftibfs \E %N_2 110229.dgn 310229 EXH]Brr -2 Traffic Im act Study Page 3 of 5 Mount Pros ect State Bank Mount Pros ect IL planned to consist of 6,340 square feet of floor area and two drive thru lanes and one ATM lane. The following sections describe the estimated trips at the proposed facility. I Site Generated Traffic The rates and equations shown in Table 1 were used to estimate trips generated by the development. They reflect typical trip ends based on the rates in the ITE Report. The ITE procedure allows up to 50% pass -by trips, however, our projections are conservative since all trips were considered new. Table 2 summarizes the number of vehicles anticipated to be generated at the site upon completion of the bank facility. These volumes are based on the average generation rate per drive thru lane of the proposed facility. ' Table 1: Trip Generation Rates t X = Independent variable (drive thru lanes) T = Estimated trip ends based on ITE Trip Generation Average Rate Trip generation rates based on ITE Trip Generation, S Edition. Peak hour rates coincide with weekday, peak hour of adjacent street traffic unless otherwise noted. - Table 2: Site Traffic Generation Building Drive -in Bank [912] Tri Generation Rate (Trips/Drive thru lanes Daily ( trips/day/drive thru lanes T = 139.25(X) AM Peak T = 9.44(X) tri s /hour /drive thru lanes of Bank PM Peak T = 27.41(X) tri s /hour /drive thru lanes Out Saturday Peak Hour of In Bank (trips /hour /drive thru T = 29.88(X) lanes X = Independent variable (drive thru lanes) T = Estimated trip ends based on ITE Trip Generation Average Rate Trip generation rates based on ITE Trip Generation, S Edition. Peak hour rates coincide with weekday, peak hour of adjacent street traffic unless otherwise noted. - Table 2: Site Traffic Generation Building Size Average AM PM Saturday Peak Hour [ITE Land Use Daily of Bank In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Code] Trips Drive -in Bank — 3 Drive [ thru lanes 420 15 15 30 40 45 85 45 45 90 Estimated trip ends based on ITE Trip Generation, 8 "' Edition. Peak hour estimates coincide with weekday, peak hour of adjacent street traffic unless otherwise noted. The site generated traffic volumes have been rounded. Trip Distribution The direction of vehicles traveling around the development site is influenced by several factors, such as site access locations, land uses, congestion, nearby traffic generators, the area road network, and travel patterns of existing traffic. This distribution was estimated based on existing traffic patterns. The estimated directional distribution for the proposed Mount Prospect State Bank development is shown in Table 3. I& CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. IJ Traffic Impact Stud Mount Prospect State Bank Mount Pros ect IL Table 3: Directional Distribution Site Traffic Assignment Page 4 of 5 The site traffic assignment for the Mount Prospect State Bank development is based on the application of the directional distribution estimates (Table 3) to the site generated traffic volumes (Table 2). The site traffic assignment for the weekday morning and evening peak hours and Saturday peak hour is shown in Exhibit 3. Total Traffic Assignment The total traffic volumes were developed in the following manner. Based on the traffic counts, the restaurant generated the following volumes for the AM, PM and Saturday peaks, respectively, 25, 30 and 50 vehicles. These volumes were removed from the existing traffic volumes. The resulting volumes were then added to the estimated site traffic volumes for the Mount Prospect State Bank development to generate the Total Traffic Volumes shown in Exhibit 4. Intersection Capacity Analyses Capacity analyses were performed for the un- signalized intersections of Elmhurst Avenue with Central Road, and Elmhurst Avenue with U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway). The un- signalized intersection capacity analyses were conducted using the HCS+ (Version 5.5) software package from McTrans. The analyses generate a level -of- service (LOS) result for each traffic movement. LOS describes the performance of the intersection and is determined based on delay (seconds per vehicle). LOS, which is a qualitative measure of intersection operation, ranges from LOS "A" to LOS "F," with LOS "A" being the best performance level for an intersection. The un- signalized intersections were analyzed using Two -Way Stop methodology and existing traffic volumes and total volumes which included site generated volumes of the bank. The results of the analyses are summarized in Table 4. CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Percent of Site Direction of Travel on Elmhurst Generated Avenge Traffic North of Site 66% South of Site 33% Total 100% Site Traffic Assignment Page 4 of 5 The site traffic assignment for the Mount Prospect State Bank development is based on the application of the directional distribution estimates (Table 3) to the site generated traffic volumes (Table 2). The site traffic assignment for the weekday morning and evening peak hours and Saturday peak hour is shown in Exhibit 3. Total Traffic Assignment The total traffic volumes were developed in the following manner. Based on the traffic counts, the restaurant generated the following volumes for the AM, PM and Saturday peaks, respectively, 25, 30 and 50 vehicles. These volumes were removed from the existing traffic volumes. The resulting volumes were then added to the estimated site traffic volumes for the Mount Prospect State Bank development to generate the Total Traffic Volumes shown in Exhibit 4. Intersection Capacity Analyses Capacity analyses were performed for the un- signalized intersections of Elmhurst Avenue with Central Road, and Elmhurst Avenue with U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway). The un- signalized intersection capacity analyses were conducted using the HCS+ (Version 5.5) software package from McTrans. The analyses generate a level -of- service (LOS) result for each traffic movement. LOS describes the performance of the intersection and is determined based on delay (seconds per vehicle). LOS, which is a qualitative measure of intersection operation, ranges from LOS "A" to LOS "F," with LOS "A" being the best performance level for an intersection. The un- signalized intersections were analyzed using Two -Way Stop methodology and existing traffic volumes and total volumes which included site generated volumes of the bank. The results of the analyses are summarized in Table 4. CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. N.T.S. CENTRAL ROAD 5 (5) 1101 1 -1 ( -) - 1201 (20) 5 LLj Q ti Ln Ln �2L2 L 10 (20) 1207 5 (10) 1101 EXIT ONLY L - V (10) 1107 - (5) 151 r, o� I u r, LEGEND° # # = A.M. PEAK ( ##) = P.M. PEAK F## = SATURDAY PEAK --- = FEWER THAN r�o� { IOJ ` r `� [ -3 5 VEHICLES t~a r _r 5 U. RourE 1 0 87 1f 7' 11 CLIENT: MOUNT PROSPECT STATE BANK PROJECT NO. CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING ETD. BRANCH OF G SPEC W STATE BANK 1102zs B R. west Higgins Road, Suite 600 DATE: R.osemoat, lllinois 60018 TITLE: 5/25/2011 (847) 8z3 -000 SITE TRAFFIC SHEET NO. N:\ MOuNTPROSPECTV :O223\TroffiC \Exniblt$ \ExH_3 11022S.a n EXHIBIT -3 N.T.S. 4 - -.— 820 (1145) 17851 1 CENTRAL RO AD 0 (ifl) 1151 17101 (960) 910 — ► 1301 (25) 10 LU 'a CH 1j 0 rn u Ln N O 1 ` I �o �i7i o Ln EXIT ONLY t— - "' (10) ` 1101 �. ...(5) 157 I Ln Ti Ti LEGEND-. # # = A.M. PEAK # #) = P.M. PEAK F # # � = SATURDAY PEAK Q53 fl SJ �+ 14803 (565) 66 0 IO — = (IS) 0101 FEWER THAN 370 (70S) C500j 5 VEHICLES U.S. fl oUrE f4 waR TyWFSr k�) CLIENT` MOUNT PROSPECT STATE BANK B CHRISTOPHER B: BURKE ENGINEERING LTD. BRANCH OF GLENVIEW STATE BANK 9575 w� }ii�ins Road, s uite 500 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 TITLE: (847) 823 -0500 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES N: %MOUNTPROSPECT \110229 \T,o'f TC \Exhi Cl +s \EXN_5 110229.tl n 3JECT N0. 110229 rE: 5/25/2011 :ET N0. EXHIBIT -4 Ln O N Ln Ln C f j u N u / / 10 (20) 1201 5 (10) 1101 EXIT ONLY t— - "' (10) ` 1101 �. ...(5) 157 I Ln Ti Ti LEGEND-. # # = A.M. PEAK # #) = P.M. PEAK F # # � = SATURDAY PEAK Q53 fl SJ �+ 14803 (565) 66 0 IO — = (IS) 0101 FEWER THAN 370 (70S) C500j 5 VEHICLES U.S. fl oUrE f4 waR TyWFSr k�) CLIENT` MOUNT PROSPECT STATE BANK B CHRISTOPHER B: BURKE ENGINEERING LTD. BRANCH OF GLENVIEW STATE BANK 9575 w� }ii�ins Road, s uite 500 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 TITLE: (847) 823 -0500 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES N: %MOUNTPROSPECT \110229 \T,o'f TC \Exhi Cl +s \EXN_5 110229.tl n 3JECT N0. 110229 rE: 5/25/2011 :ET N0. EXHIBIT -4 F Traffic Impact Studx Mount Prospect State Bank, Mount Prospect, IL Page 5 of 5 Table 4: Intersection Capacity Analysis — Site Related Movements for Existing, Total Traffic Delay (LOS) EB = Eastbound NB = Northbound LT = Left -turn lane group SB = Southbound RT = Right -turn lane group The capacity analyses of the existing intersections indicate that they will be able to accommodate the site generated traffic volumes. Conclusions and Recommendations The additional traffic generated by the Mount Prospect Bank is not expected to adversely affect traffic operations on the adjacent roadways because: • The site has convenient access to both Central Road and U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway). • Un- signalized intersection capacity analyses indicate that the projected traffic will have minimum impact on the overall level of service (LOS) when compared to existing conditions at the intersections of Elmhurst Avenue and Central Road and Elmhurst Avenue and U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway). • Sufficient on -site parking is provided which satisfies Village Code requirements. • Parking lot layout provides adequate area for vehicular circulation within the site. • The available stacking spaces provided for the drive thru lanes satisfies Village Code requirements. Consequently, no off -site roadway improvements are recommended. In addition, a bypass lane for the drive thru is not recommended based on the presence of two drive thru lanes and one ATM lane which will be adequate to accommodate the anticipated demand. FN N A MOUNTPROSPECT1 1102291Traffic %Docs\MntProspectTlS.doc 0 3 CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Existing Conditions — Peak Projected Total Traffic -- Peak Periods Periods AM PM Saturday AM PM Saturday Intersection Movement Peak Peak Central Rd & NB LTIRT 9.8 (A) 9.9 (A) 12.0 (B) 13.4 (B) 19.0 (C) 14.6 (B) Elmhurst Ave WB LT 9.5 (A) 9.7 (A) 8.9 (A) 9.5 (A) 9.8 (A) 9.0 (A) NW Huey & SB LTIRT 11.6 (B) 16.4 (C) 12.6 (B) 11.0 (B) 15.7 (C) 12.2 (B) Elmhurst Ave EB LT 8.1 (A) 9.2 (A) 8.5 (A) 8.1 (A) 9.2 (A) 8.5 (A) Delay (LOS) EB = Eastbound NB = Northbound LT = Left -turn lane group SB = Southbound RT = Right -turn lane group The capacity analyses of the existing intersections indicate that they will be able to accommodate the site generated traffic volumes. Conclusions and Recommendations The additional traffic generated by the Mount Prospect Bank is not expected to adversely affect traffic operations on the adjacent roadways because: • The site has convenient access to both Central Road and U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway). • Un- signalized intersection capacity analyses indicate that the projected traffic will have minimum impact on the overall level of service (LOS) when compared to existing conditions at the intersections of Elmhurst Avenue and Central Road and Elmhurst Avenue and U.S. Route 14 (Northwest Highway). • Sufficient on -site parking is provided which satisfies Village Code requirements. • Parking lot layout provides adequate area for vehicular circulation within the site. • The available stacking spaces provided for the drive thru lanes satisfies Village Code requirements. Consequently, no off -site roadway improvements are recommended. In addition, a bypass lane for the drive thru is not recommended based on the presence of two drive thru lanes and one ATM lane which will be adequate to accommodate the anticipated demand. FN N A MOUNTPROSPECT1 1102291Traffic %Docs\MntProspectTlS.doc 0 3 CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Traffic Impact Stud Mount Prosvect State Bank, Mount Prospect, 1L Appendix 0 3 CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Traffic Impact Stud y Mount Prospect State Bank, Mount Prospect IL Intersection Capacity Analyses W CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Traffic fm act Stud Mount Prospect State Bank Mount Prospect, IL 77 I Lj F1 u Existing Traffic Conditions Un- signalized Analysis I & CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:20 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information A naly st F rank Nemes Intersection Central and Elmhurst Agency CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Prosp Date Performed 511212011 A nalysis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period Existing AM Peak Project Descri tion Mount Prosp State Bank - Pro �ect #11 -0229 East/West Street: Central Road North /South Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume vehlh 910 10 10 820 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Veh /h 0 910 10 10 820 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 0 0 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 20 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 .0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh /h) 10 20 C (m) (veh /h) 806 766 /C 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.04 0.08 Control Delay (slveh) 9.5 9.8 LOS A A A pproach Delay (slveh) -- -- 9.8 [A pproach LOS -- -- A Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:20 AM r General Information MARY TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL � SUMMARY Y nn A naly st Frank Nemes Intersection Central and Elmhurst Agency/Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Prosp Date Performed 511212071 A nalysis Year 2099 nay sis Time Period Existing PM Peak V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Project Description Mount Yros ect State Bank - PrO eCt IF77 -U118 EastlWest Street: Central Road North /South Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West I Study Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 960 15 10 1145 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 9.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 960 15 10 1145 0 Percent Heavx Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 1 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 0 0 25 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 25 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0. 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0. Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LTR Delay, Queue Length, alnd Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh /h) 10 25 C (m) (veh /h) 772 755 1c 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.04 0.10 Control Delay (s /veh) 9.7 9.9 LOS A A A pproach Delay (s /veh) — -- 9.9 A pproach LOS -- — A Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/2412011 10:22 AM Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:22 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information A nalyst rank Nemes Intersection Central and Elmhurst Agency/Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Prosp Date Performed 511212011 A nalysis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period Existing Saturday Peak Project Description Mount Pros ect State Bank - Project #11 -0229 EastlWest Street: Central Road North /South Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 710 20 10 785 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 710 20 10 785 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T U stream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 5 0 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vehlh 5 0 20 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N . Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh /h) 10 25 C (m) (veh /h) 935 542 lc 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.03 0.14 Control Delay (s /veh) 8.9 12.0 LOS A B pproach Delay (slveh) -- -- 12.0 pproach LOS -- — B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:22 AM Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:23 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY G eneral Information Site Information A nalyst Frank Nemes Intersection NW Hwv and Elmhurst Agency/Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Pros ect Date Performed 511212011 A nalysis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period Existing AM Peak Project Description Mount Prospect State Bank - Project #11 -0229 East[West Street: U. S. Route 14 Northwest Hwy) NorthlSouth Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West I Study Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh /h 25 665 370 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 25 665 0 0 370 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channeilzed 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal i 1 I I 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 10 0 15 - Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 0 10 - 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration I I I LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh /h) 25 25 C (m) (veh /h) 1170 573 /c 0.02 0.04 95% queue length 0.07 0.14 Control Delay (s /veh) 8.1 11.6 LOS A B pproach Delay (s /veh) — -- 11.6 pproach LOS — — B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:23 AM Copyright O 2010 university of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:24 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information A nalyst Frank Nemes Intersection NW Hw y and Elmhurst Agency/Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Prospect Date Performed 511212011 A nalysis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period Existin PM Peak Project Descri tion Mount Prospect State Bank - Project #11 -0229 East/West Street: U.S. Route 14 Northwest H North /South Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West [Study Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh /h 20 565 705 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 20 565 0 0 705. 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- — 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh1h 20 0 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 0 20 0 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement .1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh /h) 20 40 C (rn) (veh /h) 874 356 lc 0.02 0.11 95% queue length 0.07 0.38 Control Delay (s /veh) 9.2 16.4 LOS A C pproach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 16.4 pproach LOS -- -- C Copyright O 2010 university of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:24 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Sitp- lnfnrmatinn A nalyst Frank Nemes Intersection NW Hwv and Elmhurst Lk2 ency/Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Prospect Date Performed 511212011 A nalvsis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period Existing Saturda Peak IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Project Description mount Pros ect State Hank - Proj ect #11 -0229 East/West Street: U.S. Route 14 Northwest Hwy) North /South Street: ElmhurstAvenue Intersection Orientation: East -West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh /h 10 480 500 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 10 480 0 0 500 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- — 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 .. 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 10 0 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 0 10 0 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration I I LTR Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh /h) 10 20 C (m) (veh /h) 1051 495 Ic 0.01 0.04 95% queue length 0.03 0.13 Control Delay (s /veh) 8.5 12.6 LOS A B A pproach Delay (slveh) — -- 12.6 pproach LOS — -- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +Tm version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:24 AM Traffic krnpact StudX Mount Pros ect State Bank Mount Prospect, IL Total Traffic Un- signalized Analysis M 3- CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information A nalyst Frank Nemes Intersection Central and Elmhurst Agency/Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Prospect Date Performed 511212011 A nalysis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period Total Traffic AM Peak Protect Description Mount Prospect State Bank - Project #11 -0229 - East/West Street: Central Road North /South Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments j Maor Street Eastbound Westbound" Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 910 10 10 820 Peak -Hour Factor PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 910 10 10 820 0 veh /h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T Up stream Signal 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound - Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 5 0 20 Peak -Hour Factor,. PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 20 0 0 0 veh /h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LTR Del ay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh /h) 10 25 C (m) (veh /h) 806 456 Ic 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.04 0.17 Control Delay (s /veh) 9.5 13.4 LOS A B A pproach Delay (slveh) — -- 13.4 A pproach HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:25 AM LOS -- — B HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:25 AM Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:26 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information A nalyst Frank Nemes Intersection Central and Elmhurst Agency/Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Pros ect Date Performed 511212097 Analysis Year 2099 A nalysis Time Period Total Traffic PM Peak Project Description Mount Pros ect State Bank - Project #11 -0229 East/West Street: Central Road North /South Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 960 25 10 1145 Peak -Hou Facto PHF 9.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vehlh 0 960 25 10 1145. 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 C onfiguration T TR LT T Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 15 0 35 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 15 0 35 0 0 0 Percent -Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Della , Queue Length, and Level of Service. A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (veh /h) 10 50 C (m) (vehlh) 765 307 Ic 0.01 0.96 95% queue length 0.04 0.57 Control Delay (slveh) 9.8 19.0 LOS A C pproach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 19.0 pproach LOS -- -- C Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:26 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information A nalyst Frank Nemes Ag e nc /Co. CBBEL Date Performed 5/12/2011 nal sis Time Period Total Traffic Saturda Peak Intersection Central and Elmhurst Jurisdiction Mount Prospect A nalysis Year 2011 Project Description Mount Prospect State Bank - Project #11 -0229 East/West Street: Central Road North /South Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West I Studv Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 710 30 15 785 Peak -Hour Factor; PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 710 30 15 785 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 15 0 25 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 15 0 25 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (vehlh) 15 40 C (m) (veh /h) 926 413 Ic 0.02 0.10 95% queue length 0.05 .0.32 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 14.5 LOS A B pproach Delay (s7veh) — -- . 14.6 pproach LOS — B Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:25 AM Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/2412011 10:27 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information A nalyst FrankNemes Intersection NWHw and Elmhurst Ag e nc /Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Pros ect Date Performed 5/12/2011 A nalysis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period Total Traffic AM Peak Project Description Mount Pros ect State Bank - Project #11 -0229 EastlVllest Street: U.S. Route 14 Northwest Hwy) NarthlSouth Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West I Study Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L_ T R V olume veh /h 20 665 370 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 20 665 0 0 370 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 5 0 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 0 5 0 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT. LTR (veh /h) 20 15 C (m) (veh /h) 1175 613 Ic 0.02 0.02 95% queue length 0.05- 0.08 C ontrol Delay (s/veh) 8.1 11.0 LOS A B A pproach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 11.0 A pproach LOS -- — B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/2412011 10:27 AM 1 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information A nalyst NW Hwy and Elmhurst F rank Nemes Agency/Co. A nalysis Year CBBEL Date Performed r: 511212011 A nalysis Time Period Total Traffic PM Peak Project Descri tion Mount Pros ect State Bank - Pro EastlWest Street: U.S. Route 14 Natthwest i Intersection Orientation: East -West V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T V olume veh/h) 15 565 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vehlh 15 565 Percent Heaw Vehicles 2 -- 0 and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound 1 4 LT 15 877 0.02 0.05 9.2 A Intersection NW Hwy and Elmhurst Jurisdiction Mount Prosp A nalysis Year 2011 ei r: 11 -0229 North /South Street: Elmhurst A Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 7 Westbound 5 T 705 1.00 705 2 T 1 ��t Southbound 11 T _ 0 1.00 0 0 0 N 0 1 LTR Southbount 10 11 LTR 30 365 0.08 0.27 15.7 C 15.7 C 12 R 15 1.00 15 2 0 12 Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +;m Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:28 AM ei r: 7 Westbound 5 T 705 1.00 705 2 T 1 ��t Southbound 11 T _ 0 1.00 0 0 0 N 0 1 LTR Southbount 10 11 LTR 30 365 0.08 0.27 15.7 C 15.7 C 12 R 15 1.00 15 2 0 12 Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +;m Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:28 AM t TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISita Information A nalyst F rank Nemes I ntersection NW Hwy and Elmhurst enc /Co. CBBEL Jurisdiction Mount Prospect Date Performed 511212019 A nalvsis Year 2011 A nalysis Time Period Total Traffic Saturday Peak I Study Period hrs : 0.25 rro eci uescrl uon m o u nr Eros ecr ,)rare danx - Y ecr 3F77 -UZZy East[West Street: U.S. Route 14 Northwest Hwy) North /South Street: Elmhurst Avenue Intersection Orientation: East -West I Study Period hrs : 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume veh/h) 15 480 500 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vehlh 15 480 0 0 500 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- — 0 — -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume veh1h 10 0 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vehlh 0 0 0 10 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration I I LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR (vehlh) 15 25 C (m) (vehlh) 1051 526 Ic 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.04 0.15 Control Delay (slveh) 6.5 12.2 LOS A B pproach Delay (slveh) -- -- 12.2 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS + Version 5.5 Generated: 5/24/2011 10:29 AM Traffic Impact Stud Mount Prospect State Bank Mount Prospect, fL Manual Turning Movement Counts 03 CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. Mount Prospect Peak Period Traffic Study (Central Rd. and Elmhurst Ave.) Study Date: Tuesday - May 10, 2011 j N -Approach _ S - Appr I E - Approach W - Approach Total Movement ! RT TH LT RT j TH — LT — LT — TH LT RT — TH — LT Time 6:30 - 6:45 a.m. ! 0 0 0 3 j 0 2 0 143 1 1 156 j 0 306 , 6:45 - 7:00 a.m. Q 0 0 2 I 0_ 1 0 156 1 2 4 209 0 374 ' 7:00 - 7:15 a.m. 0 0 0 i 3 0 1 0 -- j 157 ! 2 3 227 0 393 7:15 - 7:30 a.m. 0 0 0 I 7 0 1 0 j 199 I 1 5 220 Q i'.433 7:30 - 7:45 a.m. 0 Q O 4 0 0 0 j 224 3 4 243 0 . .478 7:45 - 8: a .m. j 0 0 0 ;. - 7 -- 0 0 0 j 21 j 0 0 216 ! 0 436 8:00 - 8:15 a.m. j 0 0 0 ; 2 I 0 0 0 1 186 ! 2 1 207 0 398 r. 8:15 - $:30 a.m. j 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 195 4 3 245 I 0 456.1 4:00 - 4:15 p.m. ! Q 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 289 1 3 223 0 520., 4:15 - 4:30 p.m. fl 0 0 I _1 0 0 1 0 239� 3 4 196 I 0 443 4:30 - 4:45 p.m. 0 0 1 0 Q 0 1 Q ! 291 ! 1 2 245 1 0 ;540.,' 4:45 - 5:00 p.m. 0 0 0 i 11 0 1 q 303 Q 3 i 207 0 525 < 5:00 - 5:15 P.M. 1 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 272 2 4 241 0 524''. . 5:15 - 5:30 P.M. j 0 0 0 5 0 0 0__ 1 2844 1 3 255 1 0 548 5:30 - 5:45 p.m. I 0 0 0 4 �� 0 1 _ 0 — _ 287 5 S 256 0 558 5:45 - 6:00 p.m. 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 229 6 1 189 ! 0 ". 430: Morning Totals 0 0 0 36 0 6 0 j 1473 Is 21 1723 ' 0 3274 Afternoon Totals 0 0 - 0 35 0 3 0 j 2194 19 25 1812 0 "4088 <' Notes: The total column Approach Totals represents ; . North all movements South across the four approaches East I West Total':: I ! I i ! ! I ! ! j I j Time 6:30 - 6:45 a.m. 0 5 Y 144. 157 306 6:45 - 7:00 a.m. 0 3 158 213 374. 7:00 - 7:15 a.m. 0 4 159 ! 230 393. 7 :15 - 7:3 a.m. 0 8 20 225 433. 7:30 -7:45 a.m. 0 4 227 247 47 8 ',.;1 7:45 - 8:00 a.m. 0 7 213 216 435 8:00 -8:15 a.m. j 0 2 188 j 208 398' 8 :15 - 8:30 a. 1 0 9 199 248 456: 4:00 - 4:15 p.m. 0 4 290 226 520'.'r5<' 4:15 - 4:30 p.m. 0 1 242 200 443:- 4:30 - 4:45 p.m. 0 1 292 247 540.'' 4:45 5:00 p.m. Q 12 _ 3_0 210 525'' 5:00 - 5:15 P.M. 0 5 — 274 245 524 5:15 - 5:30 p.m. 0 5 285 258 548 5:30 - 5:45 p.m. 0 5, 292 261 558 'I 5:45 - 6:00 p.m. ! 0 5 235 190 430'' Traffic count for all vehicles combined Mount Prospect Peak Period Traffic Study (Northwest Highway and Elmhurst Ave.) Study Date: Tuesday - May 10, 2011 I N - Approach 1 S - Approa i - A pproach W - Approach _ Total. . Movement RT TH LT i RT — I TH — LT — RT 1 — TH 1 LT — LT TH ; — L7 Time I 6:30 - 6:45 a.m. 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 58 0 0 114 3 179. -;: 6:45 7:00 a.m. I 0 0 2 0 I 0 0 2 62 _ 0 0 14$ 2 216 7:D0- 7:15 a.m. 1 0 2 I ^0 I 0 a 0 67 0 0 186 3 259 7:15 - 7:30 a.m. 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 I 100 0 0 162 I 4 273. 730 - 7:45 a.m. 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 92 0 0 173 1 3 271 7:45 - 8:00 a.m 2 0 1 0 , 0 _ 0 3 87 ! 0 0 _ 173 ! 7 273 ' 8:00 - 8:15 a.m. 1 1 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 8 j 0 0 143 3 232 8:15 - 8:30 a.m. 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 ?, 105 0 0 177 I 5 . 293 , 4:00- 4:15 p.m. I 4:15 - 4:30 p.m. 2 2 0 0 1 2 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 153 1 146 0 0 0 0 112 - 1 144 i 2 1 273 2.96 4:30 -4:45 p.m. 1 0 - 2 0 I 0 0 1 ! 179 I 0 0 125 0 . .308 4:45 - 5:00 p.m. I 1 0 1 I 0 ! 0 0 2 ; 151 I 0 0 143 :, 3 301 5:00 - 5.15 p.m. 5:15 - 5:30 p 3 2 0 0 2 3 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 3 0 187 0 18_ I 0 0 0 116 158 ; 1 1 " 312 345 5:30 - 5:45 p.m. 2 a 2 0 0 0 4 183 0 0 146 i 5 342 5:45 - 6:00 p.m. I 4 0 1 j 0 i 0 0 1 2 140 i 0 0 137 I 1 285 Morning Totals I 5 0 12 0 0 0 17 656 0 0 1276 30 199 AtternoonT 17 0 14 0 0 0 16 1324 0 0 1081 { 14 "2466: I Notes: The total column Approach Totals represents I North all movements South across the tour approaches East West Total'' <1_ i Time _ - 6:30 - 6:45 a.m. 2 0 60 1 117 179 6:45 - 7:00 a.m. 2 0 64 150 216 I 7:00 - 7:15 a.m. 3 0 67 189 259 7:15 - 7:30 a.m. I - 3 0 104 i 166 273 7:30 - 7:45 a.m. ; 1 0 94 176 271 I 7:45 - 8:00 a.m. 3 0 90 j 180 ".273 8:00 - 8:15 a.m. 1 0 85 1 146 232 8:15 - 8:30 a.m. I 2 0 109 J 182 293 _ 4:00 - 4:15 p.m. 3 a 156 114 273 '< 4:15 - 4:30 .p.m. 4 0 147 145 ..296 I i 4:30 - 4:45 p.m. ; 3 0 180 125 308 - 4:45 - 5:00 p.m. I 2 0 153 146 _ 301 _ 5:00- 5:15p.m. 5 0 190 117 312 5:15 - 5:30 p.m. 5 0 185 i 159 349 5:30 - 5:45 p.m. 1 4 0 187 151 342 I S-AS - 6:00 p.m. I 5 0 142 I 138 " '285'' Traffic count for all vehicles combined Mount Prospect Peak Period Traffic Study (Little American Restaurant Access Drives and Elmhurst Ave.) Study Date: Tuesday - May 10, 2011 I I I t i r Traffic count for all vehicles types IN CAR IN - CAR N - SLIT N - SUT ! N -MUT N -MUT S -CAR S - CAR 1 5 -SUT j5 -SLIT S-MUT S-MUT Total Movement I - In Out In Out In Out In Out 3n 1 Out In Out Time I i I Z.30-T4 5 a.m. I 1 I 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2.' 6:45 7:00 a.m. 0 0 1 D 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 7:00 -7:15 a.m. 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 1 7:15 -7:30 a.m.. 1 1 0 0 I 0 0 3 D 0 0 0 0 s'' ": 7 :30 - 7:45 a.m. 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I 1 D 0 0 5 7:45 - 8:00 a.m. I 0 I 0 0 D E - � 0 1 . 0 2 0 D 1 0 p 3 8:00 -8:15 a.m. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 D 0 0 3'! 8:15 - 8:30 a.m. I 3 1 3 0 0 E 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 11 4:00 - 4:15 p.m. .i 0 1 0 0 I D i 0 2 1 0 D 0 D 4.; . 4:15 - 4r30 p.m. I 4 ; 0 0 0 0 1 0 D 1 0 0 0 0 5 4:30 - 4:45 p.m. i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 O i. 4:45 - 5:00 p.m. 2 I 2 0 0 0 I 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 5:00 - 5:15 p.m. 4 I 4 0 0 0 1 0 2 D 0 0 0 0 10'' 5:15 - 5:30 p.m. 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:30 - 5:45 p.m. 8 1 0 0 0 I 0 2 0 0 ! 0 0 p 11:'. 5 :45- 6:DOp.m. 2 I 4 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 ; 0 0 0 9,r..r NEorrtingTotals 11 4 1 0 0 0 12 1 1 1 0 1 32. Afternoon Totals I 21 I 14 0 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 48" I Notes: The total column Approach Totals represents all in's North I North and out's for South the north south Out's 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 and south Total In's J. 2 .> 1 .4. S 2 8 2 4 3 6 1 10 4 access drives Total '- Out's l 1 0 0 :, 1 .0 1 3 2 1. _',; 3 4 2 1- 5 combined Time In's Out's In's j 6:30 -6:45 a.m. 1 0 0 6:45 - 7:00 a.m. 1 0 1 7:00 -7:15 a.m. 1 i 0 0 7:15 -7:30 a.m. 1 1 3 I 7:30 - 7:45 a.m. 3 0 2 7:45 - 8:00 a.m. 0 I 0 2 8:00 - 8 :15 a.m. I 2 0 0 8:15 - 8:30 a.m. 3 3 5 I 4:00- 4s15p.m. 0 1 2 i 4:15- 4:30p.m. 4 [ 0 0 I 4:30 - 4:45 p.m. 0 0 0 4 :45 - 5:00 p.m. j 2 [ 2 1 5:00- 5:15P.m. 4 i 4 2 5:15 - 5:30 p.m. 1 I 2 0 j 5:30- 5.45p.m. 8 € 1 2 5:45 - 6:00 p.m. 2 I 4 2 I I I t i r Traffic count for all vehicles types Mount Prospect Peak Period Traffic Study (Central Rd. and Elmhurst Ave.) Study Date: Saturday - May 14, 2011 r I Traffic countforall vehicles combined N - Approa W _ 5- Approach €E- Approach W- Ap proach Total'. Movement RT — TH — LT — RT — ! TH LT — _ RT — `— TH — L7 — RT — TH — LT Time 11c00 -11 :15 a.m. 0 0 0 € 7 0 3 0 189 5 3 167 0 - 374 11:15 11 :30 a.m. 0 0 fl 5 0 3 0 j 180 2 3 _ 177 0 370 11:30 -11:45 a.m. 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 195 2 2 166 ! 0 372` -'`. 11:45 -12:00 p.m. 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 ! 181 3 2 151 ! 0 341 -' 12:00- 12:15p.m. i 0 0 0 7 0 2 0 197 2 3 181 ! 0 392':: 12:15 -12 :30 p.m. i 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 210 1 4 191 ! 0 409 12:30 -12:45 p.m. 0 0 0 f 3 0 3 0 8 ; 3 6 173 0 377 12 :45 -1:00 p.m. ! 0 0 0 ! 6 0 1 0 188 ! 6 5 166 0 372. Totals 0 0 0 41 ! 0 13 0 1529 24 28 1372 ! 0 3007" Notes: The total column Approach Totals represents North all movements South across the four approaches East West d Total j Time 11:00 -11:15 a. 0 10 194 170 374 11:15 -11:30 a.m. 0 8 182 j 180 376 11:30 -11:45 a.m. 0 7 197 ! 168 372 € 11:45 -12:00 p.m. 0 A 184 153 341 12:00 -12:15 p.m. 0 9 1 9_9_ _ 392 ! 12:15 -12:30 p. m. 0 -- 3 _1 211 195 . 409 . . 12:30 -12:45 p.m. 0 6 192 ! 179 377 12:45 -1:00 p.m. € 0 7 194 i 171 372 r I Traffic countforall vehicles combined Mount Prospect Peak Period Traffic Study (Northwest Highway and Elmhurst Ave.) Study Date: Saturday - May 14, 2011 I Movement N- Approach RT TH _5 LT RT A pproach _ i TH LT RT E- Approach j TH LT RT W - Approach TH ; LT Total Time 11:00 -11:15 a.m. 4 0 6 ; 0 0 0 3 130 1 0 0 122 6 271 11:15 -11:30 a.m. 3 0 3 0 _ 0 0 6 116 0 0 112 E 4 244 , 11:30 -11:45 a.m. 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 -126 0 0 99 j 5: `: 236 11:45 - 12:00 p.m. 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 129 0 0 117 j 3 254 12:00 - 12:15 p.m. 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 155 0 0 98 ? 4 263 . 12:15 -12:30 p.m. 2 0_ 3 0 1 0 0 3 I_ 120 0 118 2 248 '. . 12:30 -12:45 p.m. 2 0 4 0 �0 0 1 120 0 _ 0 131 ! 2 . ... 260. 12:45 -1:00 p.m. 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 132 -3 > 247 Totals 19 0 25 0 0 0 19 1002 i 0 0 929 29 2023 Notes: The total column represents Approach Totals North all movements South across the four approaches East WWest Total ! i LI Time 11:00 -11:15 a.m. ' 10 0 133 12 8_ 271 i r 1 1:15 -11:30 a.m. 6 0 122 116 244..' i 11:30 -11:45 a.m. 4 0 128 104 236 11:45 -12:00 p.m. j 4 0 130 120 254' ;; 12:00 - 12:15 p.m. 3 0 158 f 1_ 263 12:15 -12:30 p.m. 5 0 : 120 248 12:30 - 12:45 p.m. 6 0 121 133 260 '- 12:45 1:00 p.m. 6 0 106 135 247 Traffic count for all vehicles combined Mount Prospect Peak Period Traffic Study (North Access Dr. to Little American Restaurant and Elmhurst Ave.) Study Date: Saturday- May 14, 2011 Traffic count for passenger type vehicles N•Approach S - Approach E - Approach W - Approach Total Movement ET TH LT RT I TH I LT RT TH LT 1T TH LT Time 11:00 -11:15 a.m. 0 i 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 ! 0 ` 0 0 0 7 11:15 -11:30 a.m. ' 0 D 4 0 ! 0 0 1 0 j 0 0 0 D S :' 11:30 -11:4S a.m. I 0 i 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 7 '; 11:45 -12:00 p.m. ; 0 j 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 D 3 12 : 00- 12:15p.m.' 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 12:15 -12:30 p.m. 0 0 5 1 ? 0 0 4 0 0 i 0 0 0 12:30 -12:45 p.m. 0 i 0 5 0 0 ! 0 2 0 o -0 0 0 7 :. 12:45 -1:00. p.m. I 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 D 13 Totals 0 0 30 1 0 0 21 0 4 0 0 0 - 56 i Notes: The total column Approach Totals represents all movements North I South across East the four approaches West 7' Total,`;:. I ! [ I j 3 I I 1 ! I i I 'rime I 11:00.11:15 a.m. 3 0 4 0 7 11:15 -11:30 a.m. 4 0. 1 0 5 11:30 -11:45 a.m. E 1 0 6 0 7 11:45 -12:00 p.m. 1 2 ! 0 1 D 12:00 -12:15 p.m. ; 2 0 2 0 4 12:15 -12:30 p.m. 5 1 4 0 10 12:3D -12:45 p.m. 5 D 2 0 7 12:45 -1:00 p.m. 8 0 5 0 13 E Traffic count for passenger type vehicles Mount Prospect Peak Period Traffic Study (South Access Dr. to Little American Restaurant and Elmhurst Ave.} Study Bate: Saturday - May 14, 2011 7 11 Traffic count for passenger type vehicles I N - Approach S - Approach W - Approach Total Movement RT TH LT RT f TH — LT — RT TH — LT - Fime Fi 11:00 11:15 a.m. 0 0 4 1 0 I 0 2 D 0 0 11:15 -11:30 a.m. 1 D 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 11:30 -11:45 a.m. D Q 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q D 2 11:45 -12:00 p.m. ; D i 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 .1 0 0 0 2` 12:00- 12:15p.m.I 0 j 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 Q 0 S,_'3';: 12:15 -12:30 p.m. 0 I 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 E 4 0 0 0 7 12:30 -12 :45 p.m. 0 0 0 0 ? 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 12:45 -1:00 P.M. 0 0 0 1 0 ; 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 4 TotaES 0 0 5 9 0 1 0 5 0 14 0 0 0 33 I I I Notes: The total column Approach Totals represents all movements I North South across East the four approaches West Total. i j I rime I I i I ; i E j 11:00 -11:15 a.m. 4 1 4 0 ' 9 11:15 -11:30 a.m. 1 1 3 0 5 11:30 -11:45 a.m. 0 2 0 0 i2 11:45 -12:DO p.m. 0 0 2 0 Z 12:00- 12 ;15pm. 0 j 1 2 0 3 12:15 -12:30 p.m. 0 3 4 0 7:, _'.:' 12:30 -12:45 p.m. 0 0 1 0 1 12:45 . 1:00 p.m. 0 1 3 0 . I I 11 Traffic count for passenger type vehicles June 8, 2011 Village of Mount Prospect Planning & Zoning Commission 50 S. Emerson St. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USE Proposed Mount Prospect State Bank 299 W Central, Mount Prospect, IL Dear Commissioners: Please accept the following outline as the responses provided by Mount Prospect State Bank -- a branch of Glenview State Bank, regarding the Standards for Conditional Use Approval. 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. Response: The proposed conditional use would provide services that are customary to the primary, permitted bank use. The location of the proposed permitted bank use and requested conditional use in the central business zoning district is consistent with other business permitted and existing uses and, in our opinion, would not be detrimental. 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located. Response: Surrounding zonings are the same as or similar to that existing on the subject site and the surrounding properties are already developed in accordance with those zonings. As such, it is our opinion that the inclusion of the permitted bank use on the subject site and the requested conditional use, that is generally associated with bank operations, will not impeded existing uses nor negatively impact values within the neighborhood. 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property uses permitted in the district. Response: The proposed bank use is a permitted use and consistent with the applicable zoning of the Village. The conditional use is one generally associated with banking functions and operations. Surrounding properties are already developed. As such, it is our opinion that the requested conditional use will not impede normal development or improvement of existing adjacent uses or property. 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided. Response: Based upon information shown on the preliminary engineering plans, adequate public utilities and facilities exist and are planned to serve the proposed use and conditional use. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Response: The planned development proposes to use the existing ingress and egress system. According to traffic impact information received, the proposed use and conditional use would tend to moderate some of the public street congestion that the previous use could have or did generate. B. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village. Response: it is our opinion that the proposed bank use and conditional use are consistent with the Village Comprehensive Plan and several of its stated Economic Development goals including: Maintaining services and facilities which assure the long -term economic strength of commercial centers; encourage improvement of the condition of older buildings and areas, ensure commercial areas maintain buildings, grounds and parking areas; attract commercial opportunities to further strengthen and expand tax and economic base_ Also, the proposed facility and site have.been designed to encourage pedestrian and non- vehicular access and flow within the central business core. 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations man, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Response: The proposed conditional and primary uses are planned and intended to conform to applicable regulations of the district. Respectfully offered, Mount Prospect State Bank A branch of Glenview State Bank OWNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT 299 W. CENTRAL ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Affidavit of Ownership COUNTY OF COOK ) STATE OF izLINOTS } JAMBS REVEL tinder oath, state that I am the sole ) X tans a beneficiary of the }ownerof the property an authorized offw of the ) commonly desmi bed as W s is rat Road Mt. Prospect, 111in9.os 60096 and that such property is owned by CHICAGO TITLE LAND TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE UNDER, 'TRUST AGREEMENT DATED as of thi da # SAND KNOWN AS TRUST NO. 3 4 71 -AH Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this b day of MAY , 2011 . Notary Public OFFICIAL, SEAL PATRLcK L BMUN71 . 40TAWPW C. STATE OF Ut8 Mount ProapeotD"rtmant of COmmunity Development Phone $47.918.3328 50 South Emuson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.Bi$ 3329 11'WW.R7Oi01Epr08peCtAr$ t TDD 847.392.6064 REAL ESTATE CONTRACT 299 W. CENTRAL ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS CHWAGO TnLE U49URANCE COMP REAL ESTATE SALE CONTRACT modywiunvols This Contract "Contract" is made between the parties on the date signed as follows: 1. PURL JAME GLENVIEW STATE BANK, ( "Purchaser•'), or its assigns, agrees to purchase at a price of 1 0 ( "Purchase Price "} on the terms set forth herein, the real estate in Cook County, Illinois described on Exhibit A hereto and commonly known as 299 West Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois, 60056, with a PIN number of 08 -12- 100.012 -0000, together with all improvements located thereon (collectively, the "Property"). 2. S ER: The undersigned ('Seder") agrees to sell the Property described above at the price and terms set forth herein, and to convey or cause to be conveyed to Purchaser or..its nominee title thereto by a recordable Special Warranty deed, with release of homestead rights, if any, and a proper bill of sale, subject only to: (a) covenants, conditions and restrictions of record, provided none of the same would have an adverse effect on Purchaser's proposed use or development of the Property as provided herein; (b) private, public and utility easements and roads and highways, if any, provided none of the some would have an adverse effect on Purchaser's proposed use or development of the Properly as provided herein; (c) general taxes for the year 2010 and subsequent years. 3' OF E. Purchaser shall pay jJUNNM� Ilars as earnest money ( "Earnest Money ") upon execution of this Contract by Purchaser, to be held by Seller's attorneys, Skoubis & Mantas, LLC ( "Escrowee ") in their IOLTA account, to be applied toward the Purchase Price at Closing. Purchaser agrees to pay or satisfy the balance of the purchase price, plus or minus proration, at the time of closing by payment in cash or immediately available funds. 4. SURVEY Seller agrees to furnish Purchaser with an A.L.T.A. plat of survey of the above real estate prepared by Studnicka and Associate% Ltd. on July 20, 2007 within five (5) days after Contract acceptance: Additionally, Seller agrees to furnish Purchaser with an affidavit representing that no changes have been made to the Property since July 20, 2007 that might affect the accuracy and/or completeness of the July 20, 2007 survey in all its respects. 5. CLOSING P09.SF^�.0 ON n .�- s ATE; The time of closing shall be ten (10) business days after all Conditions Precedent as set forth in Section I0 below have been met, satisfied or waived, unless subsequently mutually agreed otherwise, at the office of Chicago Title Insurance Company located at 85 West Algonquin Road, Arlington Heights, Illinois. Possession of the Property shall be delivered by Seller to Purchaser at closing. 6. BROIL COMMISSION• Seller and Purchaser each represent to the other that no real estate broker has been involved In this transaction and that no real estate broker's commission is due as a result of this transaction. Each party indemnifies the other party for a breach of the foregoing representation. 7• ZABff§1 BfOMY DE : The Earnest Money shall be held by Escrowee for the mutual benefit of the parties. 8. I E QE '!Cx Seller represents that Seller and its beneficiaries have received no notices from any city, village or other governmental authority of zoning, building, fire, or health code or environmental violations in respect to the Property that have not been heretofore corrected. 9. Purchaser's obligation to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Contract is expressly contingent upon, or subject to, Purchaser's review and investigation of, and satisfaction for Purchaser's intended use as to, matters of any type or description on or affecting the Property, whether or not related to the physical condition thereof (collectively, the "Due Diligence Matters'. Purchaser shall have until 5:00 p.m. (Chicago time) on the sixtieth (60 day after the date of Seller's acceptance (such period referred to herein as the "Due Diligence Period ") within which to investigate and review the Due Diligence Matters. From and after the date hereof. Purchaser, its employees, agents and representatives, shall have the right to conduct such inspections, studies and the like, as well as to contact governmental officials, in order to investigate the Due Diligence Matters, but specifically excluding any invasive testing on the Property unless Purchaser's Phase I Audit (see paragraph 10 (c) ) recommends conducting a Phase lI or similar testing. If this Agreement is terminated for any reason, Purchaser shall, within thirty (30) days of termination, deliver to Seller copies of any and all environmental studies, reports, documents, plans or analyses created or obtained by Purchaser (the "Environmental Documents'. All Environmental Documents shall be generated by the engineers and/or consultants for the use of Purchaser's and Seller's attorneys, and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be the work product of both Purchaser's and Seller's respective attorneys and shall constitute confidential, attomey- client communications and each Party shall use its best efforts to ensure that such confidence and privilege is maintained.. In connection with the foregoing, Purchaser, its employees, agents and representatives shall have the right, upon reasonable prior notice to Seller, to enter upon the Property and in connection therewith, Seller may require that Purchaser and the other parties entering upon the Property on Purchaser's behalf be accompanied by a representative of Seller. Furthermore, Seller shall deliver a copy of that certain Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the Property prepared by Mionx Corporation on January, 2001, within five (5) business days of Seller's acceptance. Seller represents that it has no other written materials or documents in its possession relating to the environmental condition of the Property, including but not limited to soil tests and environmental reports, studies and tests. Purchaser must obtain the prior written consent of Seller before conducting any tests, examinations inspections, studies or the like on the Property provided, however, that Seller shall not unreasonably withhold, delay or condition its consent. Purchaser hereby indemnifies, defends, and holds Seller and its beneficiaries harmless from and against any and all loss, damage, liability, cost and expenses which Seiler may incur as a consequence of the aforesaid entry onto the Property and the activities conducted on the Property by 1 Purchaser and its employees, agents and representatives. Purchaser's indemnity obligations under this Paragraph 9 shall survive the Closing or earlier termination of this Contract. If, during the Due Diligence Period, Purchaser determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that the Property or the transaction contemplated in this Contract, is unsuitable, for any reason or no reason, then Purchaser may elect to terminate this Contract by giving written notice thereof to Seller at any time on or before the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. In the event Purchaser terminates this Contract pursuant to this Paragraph 9, Seller and Purchaser shall direct the Escrowee to return the Earnest Money to Purchaser, neither party shall thereafter have any further rights or obligations hereunder other than those obligations which by their terms expressly survive closing or earlier termination of this Contract. 10. CQN=QNS The Closing is expressly contingent upon, or subject to, the following matters set forth in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) below (collectively, the "Conditions Precedent'): (a) REAL 19UM AMMAN. Within six (6) months of the date of Se 's acceptance: i) he valid and effective enactment by the Village of Mount Prospect (the ` Vi ge') of one *rmore ordinances and/or resolutions accomplishing the following, all in form and substance acceptable to Purchaser in its sole discretion: zoning the Property to permit the construction and operation as a matter of right a bank/financial institution and office building in a one (1) story building containing approximately 6,504 gross square feet of floor area (exclusive of the drive - through canopy); two (2) drive - through lanes and one (1) A.T.M.drive- through lane; thirty (30) parking spaces, including four (4) handicap accessible spaces; and the building fronts on Central Road and Elmhurst Avenue; and ii) The valid and effective approval by the Illinois Department of Transportation of the site plan including curb cuts and traffic flow for the construction and operation as a matter of right a bank/financial institution and office building in a one (1) story building containing approximately 6,500 gross square feet of floor area (exclusive of the drive - through canopy); two (2) drive- through lanes and one (1) A.T.M. drive- through lane; thirty (30) parking spaces, including four (4) handicap accessible spaces; and the building fronts on Central Road and Elmhurst Avenue, (all of the foregoing collectively the "Real Estate Approvals'). Notwithstanding the foregoing, all Real Estate Approvals must be valid, enforceable by Purchaser, unconditional and final and not subject to any relinquishing, conveyance or dedication of any part of the Property In the event the Real Estate Approvals are not obtained within said six (6) month period, Purchaser, at Purchaser's option, can extend the time for obtaining the Real Estate Approvals an additional two (2) months, provided that Purchaser (i) gives Seller written notice of such extension before expiration of the 6 month period and (ii) Purchaser deposits an additional Twenty Five Thousand and No/100 ($25,000.00) Dollars as Earnest Money with Escrowee, together with such extension notice. (b) RIEGULA'T RY APPROVAi S : Within six (6) months of the date of Seller's acceptance, the valid and effective governmental approvals (collectively, the "Regulatory Approvals ") permitting the operation by Purchaser of a banking facility with drive-through and walls -up windows and ATM. It is understood that Regulatory Approval may be required from one or more of the following agencies or governmental bodies: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation — Bureau of Banks and Real Estate, and Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all Regulatory Approvals must be valid, enforceable by Purchaser, and unconditional. In the event the Regulatory Approvals are not obtained within said six (6) month period, Purchaser, at Purchaser's option, can extend the time for obtaining the Regulatory Approvals an additional two (2) months, provided that Purchaser (i) gives Seller written notice of such extension before expiration of the 6 month period and (ii) Purchaser deposits an additional Twenty Five Thousand and No /100 ($25,000.00) Dollars as Earnest Money with Escrowee, together with such extension notice, unless an additional Twenty Five Thousand and NoA00 ($25,000.00) Dollars has been deposited as Earnest Money pursuant to the provisions of 10 (a) above. (c) ENVMQMUNTAL AUD • Phase I audit is a condition of closing. Therefore: (1) Purchaser shall within forty -five (45) days of Seller's acceptance C 1rPA Investigation Period') procure at Purchaser's cost and expense a Phase I environmental audit ('Phase 1 Audit ") pertaining to the Property. If the Phase I Audit discloses environmental conditions which Purchaser in its sole and absolute discretion deems to be unacceptable (the "Environmental Conditions "), then on or before ten (10) days after receipt of the Phase I Audit, Purchaser shall advise Seller in writing ("notice") of such Environmental conditions and in Purchaser's sole and absolute discretion shall either (i) terminate the Contract whereupon the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder other than those obligations which by their terms expressly survive closing or earlier termination of this Contract or (ii) shall send notice of intent to perform a Phase II Audit defined below. If Purchaser does not deliver its notice of termination in a timely manner, the condition contained in this Section 10(c) shall be deemed met, satisfied or waived by Purchaser. Purchaser shall, within ten (10) days after giving said notice of performing a Phase 11 Audit to Seller, order, at Purchaser's cost a Phase II audit ("Phase II Audit ") which shall be completed within 45 days. Within five (5) days after receiving the Phase II Audit, Purchaser shall provide Seller with a copy of the Phase II Audit and within ten (10) business days after receipt (the "Seller Reply Period" }, Seller shall notify Purchaser whether Seller intends to effectuate remediation of Environmental Conditions in a manner and result which are acceptable to Purchaser in its sole and absolute discretion. If Seller advises Purchaser that it shall not remediate the Environmental Conditions, Purchaser shall, within ten (10) business days of the earlier of (a) receipt of Seller's response or (b) expiration of the Seller Reply Period, notify Seller in writing of Purchaser's intent to (x) purchase the Property "as is, where is, with all faults" or (z) terminate this Contract, in which event the Earnest Money 1 shall be returned to Purchaser and thereupon this Contract shall be null and void and of no further force or effect and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder, except for _those obligations which, by their express terms, are to survive any termination of this Contract. If Seller does not reply within the Seller Reply Period, it shall conclusively be deemed to be Seller's refusal to remediate the Environmental Conditions. If Seller undertakes to remediate the Environmental Conditions, then Seller shall remediaw such conditions within 30 days of receipt of the expiration of the Seller Reply Period; provided, however, that if such remediation cannot be completed by Seller's diligent efforts within 30 days, then Seller shall have an additional 30 days to complete the remediation (collectively, the " Remediation Period Upon completion, Seller shall provide Purchaser with such follow -up environmental reports ("Supplemental Environmental Report") as are necessary to evidence that the Environmental Conditions have been remediated and no further action needs to be taken with respect to the Environmental Conditions. (2) If the Supplemental Environmental Report, if applicable, is not delivered to Purchaser on or before one hundred eighty (ISO) days after Contract acceptance, or if Seller fails to remediate the Environmental Conditions within the Remediation Period, then this Contract may be canceled and terminated by either party and the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser and thereupon this Contract shall be null and void and of no further force or effect and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder, except for those obligations which, by their express terms, are to survive any termination of this Contract. (d) gq INIC� GENCY. In the event that the Conditions in sections (a), (b) and (c) above have not, for any reason whatsoever, been satisfied on or before six (6) months following Contract acceptance, Purchaser shall have the right, upon giving, written notice thereof to the Seller, at any time prior to the expiration said six (6) months (which may be extended an additional two (2) months in Purchaser's sole discretion) to terminate this Contract, in which event the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser. Thereupon this Contract shall be null and void and of no further force or effect and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder, except for those obligations which, by their express terms, are to survive any termination of this Contract. 11. DEFAULT: Notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, neither party shall be deemed to be in default hereunder unless and until the other party has given the defaulting party written notice specifying the default and said defaulting party has failed to cure such default by the earlier of the date ten (10) days after delivery of said notice or the Closing Date, it being agreed that time is of the essence with respect to the consummation of the transaction on the Closing bate as herein contemplated. 12. BINMG EMCT. This Contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, transferees, representatives, successors and permitted assigns. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties related to the subject matter hereof, superseding all prior agreements and understandings, and may be modified only by a written instrument executed by all parties hereto. 14. A5 . Purchaser may, upon notice to Seller, without Seller's consent, assign this Contract and Purchaser's rights hereunder to an entity which is under common control with Purchaser, provided that such assignee shall assume Purchaser's obligations under this Contract pursuant to an assignment and assumption agreement in form and substance acceptable to Seller and fiuther provided that notwithstanding such assignment and assumption agreement, purchaser shall not be relieved or released from any liability under this Contract. 15. /DAY FOR PERMI n r s WM* Whenever under the terms of this Contract the time for performance of an obligation, covenant or condition falls on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, such time for performance shall be extended to the next business day, Otherwise, all references herein to "days" shall mean calendar days. !b. COUNTERPARTS: This Contract may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement, 17. FURTHER ASSURANCES Each party hereby agrees to execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other party such instruments and take such other actions, in addition to the instruments and actions specifically provided for herein at any time and from time to time after execution of this Contract whether before or after the Closing Date as such other party may reasonably request in order to effectuate the provisions of this Contract or the transactions contemplated hereby or to oonfum or perfect any right to be created or transferred hereunder or pursuant to this transaction, provided that neither party shall be required to incur any material expense in connection therewith. 18. NO RECOI(tDTNQ, Neither this Contract nor any type of memorandum hereof shall be recorded with the Cook County Recorder or any other governmental agency. Any recordation or filing hereof or of any memorandum hereof by or for Purchaser shall constitute an immediate, incurable default on the part of Purchaser hereunder. 19. TRI T C RIVER Any failure of any party to insist upon strict performance by the other party of any of the provisions of this Contract shall not be deemed a waiver of the provisions hereof, unless otherwise expressly stated herein, irrespective of the number of violations or breaches that may occur and each patty, notwithstanding any such failure, shall have the right thereafter to insist upon strict performance by the other of any and all of the provisions of this Contract. 20. 2 1. RP E,SENTATFO_ NS OF NELLFR- Seller represents that as of the date hereof (except as otherwise expressly set forth below) and as of the Closing Date (unless otherwise stated at Closing): (a) Seller owns in fee simple the Property. . J�9� (b) As of the CIosing, Seller will have the power to convey the Property to Purchaser. (c) All necessary action has been taken by Seller to authorize the execution of this Contract and the performance of its obligations required hereunder. (d) There are no claims, causes of action or other litigation or proceedings pending or, to Seller's actual knowledge without duty of inquiry, threatened in respect to the ownership or operation of the Property or any part thereof, excepting as expressly provided in this Contract (including the aforesaid Conditions Precedents relating to Seller's ability to convey the Property to Purchaser or perform any of its obligations or make any of its representations hereunder including, without limitation, disputes with tenants, :mortgagees, governmental authorities, utilities, Contractors, adjoining land owners and suppliers of goods and services. (e) This Contract is valid and enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms and each instrument executed and delivered by Seller pursuant hereto shall be valid and enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms. 22. REPRESE4 AUM OF vrmru,► FR: Purchaser represents that as of the date hereof (except as otherwise expressly set forth below) and as of the Closing Date: (a) Purchaser has the power to acquire the Property, (b) Ail necessary action has been taken by Purchaser to authorize the execution of this Contract and the performance of its obligations required hereunder.. (e) This Contract is valid and enforceable against Purchaser in accordance with its terms and each instrument executed'and delivered by Purchaser hereto shall be valid and enforceable in accordance with its terms. 23. SECIM 1445 Seller represents that he is not a "foreign person" as defined in Section 1445 of the internal Revenue Code and is themfore exempt from the withholding requirements of said Section. Seller will furnish Purchaser at closing the Exemption Cettifcation set forth in said Section. 24. ACCEPTANCE: A duplicate original of this Contract, duly executed by the Sellers, shall be delivered to the Purchaser within three (3) days from the date hereof, otherwise, at the Purchaser's option, this Contract shall become null and void and the Earnest Money shall be refunded to the Purchaser. This Contract Is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations set forth on the following Pages, which Conditions and Stipulations are made apart of this Contract. (SIGNATURE PAGE To FOLLOW] IN WITNESS 'WHEREOF, the parties have caused the Real Estate Sale Contract to be executed on the dates set forth below. PURCHASER: GLENVIEW STATE BANK, an Illinois Chartered bank By: � C mo S, . . Name: 7' .v a b t ~,FrH Its: _ 5o Da of Purchaser's Execution: U,•1' S .2011 Address: 800 Waukegan Road Glenview, Illinois 60025 Attn: John Diedrich Fax: 847/832-0150 8 SELLER: CHICAGO TITLE LAND TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated 719/85 d known as Trust No. 34 -AH B y Name: Its: Date of Seller's Acceptance: &V . 2011 Address: c/o John N. Skoubis Skoubis & Mantas, LLC 1300 W. Higgins Rd. Ste. 209 Park Ridge, Illinois 60068 Fax: (847) 696 -0901 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS I . Seller shall deliver or cause to be delivered to Purchaser or Purchaser`s attorney, not later than ten (i 0) business days after the acceptance date of this Contract, a title commitment (which is to be ordered by Seller's attorney through Chicago Title Insurance Company) for an owner's title insurance policy issued by the Chicago Title Insurance Company in the amount of the Purchase Price, with extended coverage covering title to the Property on or after the date hereof, showing title in the intended grantor. Seller shalt have delivered a copy ofthe plat of survey to the title insurer prior to issuance of the aforesaid title commitment so that said title commitment includes the title insurer's review thereof. The title commitment shall be conclusive evidence of good title as therein shown as to all matters insured by the policy, subject only to the exceptions as therein stated. Seller also shall furnish Purchaser an affidavit of title in customary form covering the date of closing and showing title in Seller. Seller will obtain extended coverage over standard policy exceptions nos. 1 -5, at its cost and expense; any other endorsements (except those required to clear defects as otherwise provided in this Contract) as Purchaser determines are appropriate will be obtained by Purchaser at its expense, but Seller will reasonably cooperate with Purchaser to obtain such additional endorsements. 2. If the title commitment or plat of survey discloses either unpermitted exceptions or survey matters that render the title unmarketable (herein referred to as "survey defects "), Seller shall have 30 days from the date of delivery thereof to have the exceptions removed from the commitment or to correct such survey defects or to have the title insurer commit to insure against loss or damage'that may be occasioned by such exceptions or survey defects, and, in such event, the time of closing shall be ten (10) business days after delivery of the commitment or the time expressly specified in Paragraph 5 of the Contract, whichever is later. If Seller fails to have the exceptions removed or correct any survey defects, or in the alternative, to obtain the commitment for title insurance specified above as to such exceptions or survey defects within the specified time, Purchaser may terminate this Contract or may elect upon notice to Seller within 10 days after the expiration of the 30 -day period, to take title as it then is with the right to deduct from the Purchase Price liens or encumbrances of a definite or ascertainable amount. If Purchaser does not so elect, this Contract shall become null and void without further action of the parties. 3_ Water and other utility charges, fuels, prepaid service Contracts, general taxes, if any, and other similar items shall be adjusted ratably as of the time of closing. The amount of the current general taxes not then ascertainable shall be prorated on the basis of 105% of the most recent ascertainable taxes. The taxes will be reprorsted upon issuance of the 2nd installment 20I0 tax bill if this transaction closes during the 2011 calendar year and the taxes will be reprorated upon issuance of the 2nd installment 2011 tax bill if this transaction closes during the 2012 calendar year. The reproration for the calendar year proceed ing the calendar year in which this transaction closes will be based upon the actual tax bill for that calendar year. The reproration for the calendar year during which this transaction closes will be based upon 110% of the actual tax bill for the calendar year proceeding the calendar year during which the transaction closes. The reproration will be completed within thirty (30) days after 90 Buyer's receipt from the Seller of the 2nd instaliment tax bill for the applicable calendar year. Seller shall pay the amount of any stamp tax imposed by State law on the transfer of the title, and shall furnish a completed Real Estate Transfer Declaration signed by the Seller or the Seller's agent in the form required pursuant to the Real Estate Transfer Tax Act of the State of Illinois and steal I furnish any declaration signed by the Seller or the Seller's agent or meet other requirements as established by any local ordinance with regard to a transfer or transaction tax; such tax required by local ordinance shall be paid by the party upon whom such ordinance places responsibility therefor. 4. The provisions of the Uniform Vendor and Purchaser Risk Act of the State of Illinois shall be applicable to this Contract. 5. If Purchaser defaults under the Contract, Seller, as its sole remedy, shall terminate this Contract and retain all of the Earnest Money as liquidated damages and not as a penalty-and upon Seller's receipt thereof, this Contract shall become null and void and of no further force or effect and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder (except for those obligations which, by the express terms hereof, are to survive any termination). If Seller defaults under this Contract, Purchaser, as its sole and mutually exclusive remedies for such default, shall elect either (a) to terminate this Contract, in which event the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser and this Contract shall become null and void and of no further force or effect and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder (except for those obligations which, by the express terms hereof, are to survive any termination) or (b) to obtain specific performance of this Contract, b. This sale shall be closed through an escrow with Chicago Title and Trust Company, in accordance with the general provisions of the usual form of Deed and Money Escrow Agreement then in use by Chicago Title and Trust Company, with such special provisions inserted in the escrow agreement as may be required to conform to this Contract. Upon the creation of such an escrow, anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, payment of Purchase Price and delivery of deed shall be made through the escrow and this Contract and the Earnest Money shall be deposited in the escrow. The cost of the escrow shall be divided equally between Seller and Purchaser. Time is of the essence of this Contract. S. All notices shall be in writing and shall be served by one Party or attorney to the other Party or attorney. Notice shall be given in the following manner: (a) By personal delivery of such Notice; or, (b) By mailing of such Notice to the addresses recited herein by regular mail and by certified mail, return receipt requested, Except as otherwise provided herein. Notice served by certified mail shall be effective on the date of mailing; or, 10 90 (c) By sending facsimile transmission. Notice shall be effective as of date and time of facsimile transmission, provided that the Notice transmitted shall be sent on business days (no Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays). In the event fax Notice is transmitted after 5:00 p.m. Chicago time, the effective date and time of Notice is the first hour of the next business day after tra mnission; or, (d) By sending e-mail transmission. Notice shall be effective as of date and time of e-mail transmission, provided that the Notice transmitted shall be sent during business days. In the event e-mail Notice is transmitted after 5:00 p.m. Chicago time, the effective date and time of Notice is the first hour of the next business day after transmission; or, (e) By commercial overnight delivery (e.g., FedEx). Such Notice shall be effective on the next business day (no Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays) following deposit with the overnight delivery company. Notices may, in the alternative, be given to that party's attorney as follows: SeIlees, Attorney: John N. Skoubis Skoubis 8c Mantas, LLC 1300 W. Higgins Rd., Ste. 209 Park Ridge, IIlinois 60068 Telephone: (847) 696 -0900 Fax: (847) 696 -0901 E-mail: 's ubis k ismantas.com Pu 's AtWmm : Norman 1. Kurtz Norman I Kurtz, Ltd, 32 W. Busse Avenue Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056 'telephone; 847/577 -8310 Fax: 8471577 -4216 E -mail: norm zlawoffice.com 11 ExHwrr LEGAL. DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF LOT 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE iiO C RTHI[EST .. CORNER OF SAID LOT 1: THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST' LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 246.07 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 67.34 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE THAT 1S DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 65.76 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT T, A DISTANCE OF 55.38 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1: THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1: THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 1 IN BUSSE AND WILLE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MOUNT PROSPECT IN THE HEST 1/2 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN (EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 THEREOF (AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK) LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 141 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) NORTHEAST AND PARALLELL WITH THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK) ACCORDING TO PLAT OF SAID DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON APRIL 14, 1976 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2863967. PARCEL 2: EASEMENT FOR COIM,lON DRIVEWAY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FUR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL i AS CREATED BY'DOCUMENT RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER LR2875584 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION IN SECTION! 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE ]WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SAID POINT BEING 72.0 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE DRAAM PERPENDICULAR TO SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 72.93 FEET; THECE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 77.49 FEET: THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 26.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 50.50 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 80.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SAID POINT BEING 45.0 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 23.0 FEET TD THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS (EXCEPT FOR THAT PART FALLING IN PARCEL 1). DEED 299 W. CENTRAL ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS xv F r; l '.�. . t J '� .. : •S, „si.V�[��;;= aE.'(ri xS: f ' : 1�,�73 ;�}�} �._:a f itsSllbttltii!'# :3 i 5�:3`s3 J W itttt915tt(1, iCtjat L �r ^rdnioi' of t;m Ca Air of .� C• C"5R _ r-d the 3ta[e o! w raI to eeroldeeatiate of - _ - . ..rygh Atfp �Yt /is;e7 - --- Dotlars, lad other good and vahuble cmuiectottah M hand MR. ”- �.tli:Exiattt_ unto T119 BANK 4 TRtfs'. CO':PA%y CW ARLINM.4 ISEIcirM as IIIIttoL �� Ca/Paral4A of Arlpstcit HefMtL. itlt"W. h anr'ray.ar at tavasears as 1. .. W lea cads, the rovla[aaa et a Last D aRvet.wnt datM day . _ bWv -� '*-U kmwsk as rnLSt Number �2�_ the fWla7ring des -nbed Celt estata In the County o r _ and Stale al flltm u ro•wu: - --SEE Rs:: ., [.fX'1U. E "" 77Cti MMMW TO AM YAM A PAM QP MW W, 3471 Itut th of S am �rr#l�stl m follatst assq the the nest lia o f salt Lot a dtstaftc�zr as feet; o f Lhm 677.34 ate rttiaastert'� >zlic�llar to the hest line of said Lot 1 s dlstaMe of Of Southwesterly tits of tot I, & is� a of 65.76 then ElL a,der to tics Westerly � o f W thg west Um e of said Io- 1, a dttstanae of 55.7 "fa 17ne that is said Lot 11 thence it*est al said Lot 1 j titer North al cot to the 111ost o+ISf sold East 1 1:v to !in lbrth Ism of Stlbd f? 4 said Noz lies to the Folnt of begitl tynq, In 1 )nsldttrata Black Cite 11� Sn &W36 and W111a s Rembdivisioft in Molult JAM Pttospnt:t !tt ".7 Princlpal Meridlagi that a Pit Va st Hal 1 Fas of MCI Third the A10rth lists of Bald 81061, •' o f ortfh"starty t & I in* I4, jimet Apr11 14, 147 t{ dtntrod aloes t Plat O f saold besidazat of to t?a with the Slpn otttlteeat Linn of said Rloelh, Uv gh Aat o sold Deatadfvis rtlgiatotnd in fete tJrTire of the i of Cook Ctotlrity, I1 get 4. as in ent i s of the R3 tjiatrar of Titles MM Y.Vt1...I . !! 1 Of Iime. teal eaC,eedi fa a era ea7a sf'a OeaepAli as 1n ttlSutw and upva aaY iriTA3 ♦aa tar arr l++s�l. v. [• t1Dae BAY terms �� sa Bay aine!v demos thv Tarn e1 a!6 Yteao, at><1 to retterr ar rzterltl�jtates _ �SRi ; and p[ovlsittas thervA at Bra &atad M Aeaod■ a[ time and to amend. stuA� of tAedify hsaw ecd tiu tereat t�1 f �tl Dieu � �� ix'd s ar lltAes baeaf[rr, to eonVSet to sna@v isms, and tv N•rn .q,i,uy to lyres reap etittg the lttsartee o[ JSrxw uA Optlanu W Wtshase thr whole er ant sari of the rvweawA a•,! to ecaLaet er1Y. K aitY tart taatrat: for �r iEar vvna nd inte:xlFtLtre rvatais. to PaT•.tdan or tv vul.aaLr sod e7ee. * WIF ahova Apse ' t d. at aW ji' a4 ittitts heieil ter "qua rAe Tama. wbt%w aat&yts to zr to aafd Dsetaital or to Wh= toga ee rnonpt!eI by said !rums be ebikrd to art C> nti ertutaq; qc f_ aQ wllaea to Ytgatn i-sa a ateeTtiRY igad_at Drtvile[ed to iawlrw Fwlw ..... • �+}xr�lts� . aY tool ao`La letiliitmiltt. steal at Ihi tteae of t a r de IwrY t 2 tlte�t t this F iti=tea by b In -: r� t was extatted In acCUITIa a +h h we sews msditiioa�a Wd 1!a i41 o i that much 11 t lyancc cxc tewai d edlatS ¢r Its Jalsf as7adtgvei thsera[ alai OlA YFaa all LCae�iCtariri t+ti YedG�e afid said �Y ant L th a am t d Bad iaepaarwd w r�leetna Bad dafnvs avert sucFe deed. Uui dasari`ra*6 �� a te'�a ap t rJ IA tttts7 h.ael6ee i m"Ya Is nude to i 4UMSE4r tic aaR7lSWS is iTtyL that s7� r or authorlites, dtlNas and aMttltm sA tha t11Te. L� " estaTp r�•TS, puss, ti. hfa�tOV �adl�ariitt`�tewii .. 4he attven of eae6 aai eveens� t1v'f1vtary heleuadtr end of ol[ mrmm clslmin shalu be only in the nmwg , 6. a" Proteeds at sunder ttoft w a ;r of ehtta and avrh Intlrat L kdrb e�! MIDa teem the sale j, other dttpoauwa al $44. 1 '� ntaTL ter fnla7eal. trW at tahxR raasloa'cA lid lest pule a � bol o b pnt &wy ht{p %,!, Lave an! We P iheteet a di tesatd. Ta =tfa. iYalls Bed ..' at the titta to of eht :bow WAS U hov or lleteamor most4F*4 the Rest =r of 7rlfet a 1.t -te7 duetted gat to te�itlK Ot 1 u .a CRUACUO Ot LLl Or dtrytirate MITeaf, at ataiSe7 Iha tset tMdtlian, ofj "alt[t jltelt„st;pp4- 'Yvan ' - and DroYJOVd. of �otdl W Amtivc aaptltt. le LJ� G[ eoCOadante 07th the statute to r•�t rnrl mad* • And e tr+n virl of any d p ie. - ^4-lbY �D*�*q• �afur� and trieasc aa.Y an8 an rtght to beat :1.: and by slat -!" at the state o! G141a1; e7[vau planrKiu prortdlttstarThe .semplionofhomeme .a* safe m In tef4ttac tiaereaG tha I=ter.._ afaraafd ha breathe, set big hatd.�mdRo - t.`.• 1- daye ' -t • �+}xr�lts� . Y . 0 _• •• 1 . V� t be �s gad vc• r� 6it1 oily tii tiK tt[i inita. a wad to et urler and att all varsa[u a aF t(nio9 t,lydv [ and hrm ar such Itttfnut is hfI yd +itsts9 ! t6e tai► ar o dsfpoLttQn at Nr3 [ f W14 1n Iti+l ae tAlltt367f. Ia or to said re on u pltla, aqt m 6e(ef6ewryr hnfundtr Eha i td '. aa[q�yy 411e Pra o Fstar a afere[a1d• Y an interest 1n a raram" YYaQt grid M ta�fiti' a nwi is t el i r t ate a m er e ein4 tt(s �yo�tda"m Cand 1n Ftrur�ar(d H ^wHh f11(}ltatiaof„•' err trams at atmuss cTpaty a[[a Nat Y . .hl alalult fn autA [area ._a3f W[tue of at aM ntaa.., hf[ar t SlAt and relca[�.. - tseetlgaa os otht all statutq aI the 8ule ai tllrrc(r tWO idme fat t� exem.991 t or btn ls! un'sr[rd b� A Of hotnaset9s flack axle py In Wttnatt t!f [ranter_. afomsid k h[rannlo [tl land_ and t *-t eat ts�cl •71• •l t..lr[r.� • ' "MMM PIaE ARW HYt -IO STAR= A. PMY $00 E. N&mlwjt,, RoW i t VR AND TO I"I the faidArl�on Saights U 600J4 putPefca htttltt aad 1n aaW 1mt atrtamtnt Alit 1ha appttrlena(tt_ upon th, tnnb aad err ......�� F. l 1 .1 1 tax 4 � 1 rF ti •i ; •t.LCw' ; 1 1r �; ' 1. . 0 _• •• 1 . V� t be �s gad vc• r� 6it1 oily tii tiK tt[i inita. a wad to et urler and att all varsa[u a aF t(nio9 t,lydv [ and hrm ar such Itttfnut is hfI yd +itsts9 ! t6e tai► ar o dsfpoLttQn at Nr3 [ f W14 1n Iti+l ae tAlltt367f. Ia or to said re on u pltla, aqt m 6e(ef6ewryr hnfundtr Eha i td '. aa[q�yy 411e Pra o Fstar a afere[a1d• Y an interest 1n a raram" YYaQt grid M ta�fiti' a nwi is t el i r t ate a m er e ein4 tt(s �yo�tda"m Cand 1n Ftrur�ar(d H ^wHh f11(}ltatiaof„•' err trams at atmuss cTpaty a[[a Nat Y . .hl alalult fn autA [area ._a3f W[tue of at aM ntaa.., hf[ar t SlAt and relca[�.. - tseetlgaa os otht all statutq aI the 8ule ai tllrrc(r tWO idme fat t� exem.991 t or btn ls! un'sr[rd b� A Of hotnaset9s flack axle py In Wttnatt t!f [ranter_. afomsid k h[rannlo [tl land_ and t *-t eat ts�cl •71• •l t..lr[r.� • ' "MMM PIaE ARW HYt -IO STAR= A. PMY $00 E. N&mlwjt,, RoW i t VR AND TO I"I the faidArl�on Saights U 600J4 putPefca htttltt aad 1n aaW 1mt atrtamtnt Alit 1ha appttrlena(tt_ upon th, tnnb aad err ......�� F. l 1 .1 1 tax 4 � 1 r .1.1 ii' >1 7,7 s. F IBM I t IF: v o-. 7,t .. , I 57AT OF ....... ccum OF..... a.. CIA lb. Walk atom a14, d, > Wby CM10 Mal r, -------------- i..waalt, hnoarn some is be tha 9Ubv,*t4 b the f an{ef� bet--U& d a y 1n prnon and MIN -A dell- q aid IrAlru his = ------- &" VA VQWAUY "L ftp 10to t uft A M W*f"r Of the fliff, of h.stsMSd. U.Aw m ate! netarfes thts r .1.1 ii' >1 7,7 s. F IBM I t IF: v o-. 7,t .. , I PAID RECEIPT OF RECENT TAX BILL 299 W. CENTRAL ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Cook County Treasurer's Office I property Tax & Payment information Page 1 of 1 ftw a • ` °' �, Office of Cook County Treasurer - Marla Pappas Cilck o kon to s Cook County Property Tax & Payment information sand � Prinwd copme of this Information - my not be used as a tax b11t. printer palm to '�` r M o' payments must be aubmllted with odglnal tax bRL http: wwvtr. cookcountytreasuher. com/ paymentprintout- aspx ?type=�current&pin= 081210001... 5/4/2011 Property index Numbar (PIN): 00- 12.10"12.00oo Printed oOPIft of this inftmstlon may not be wad as a tax WIL Payments must be submitted with orIginst tax bt[I. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE- THROUGH LANES) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 299 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Mount Prospect State Bank, a branch of Glenview State Bank, (Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit to operate a bank with drive - through lanes for property located at 299 West Central Road (Property) and legally described as: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 246.07 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 67.34 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERY ALONG A LINE THAT IS DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1. A DISTANCE OF 65.76 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 55.38 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 1 IN BUSSE AND WILLE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MOUNT PROSPECT IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN (EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF THEREOF (AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK) LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 141 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) NORTHEAST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK) ACCORDING TO PLAT OF SAID DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN APRIL 14, 1976 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2863967. Property Index Number: 08 -12- 100 - 012 -0000; and WHEREAS, the "Petitioner" seeks a Conditional Use permit to operate a bank with drive - through lanes WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit being the subject of PZ -16- 11 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28 day of July, 2011, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13 day of July, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect in support of the request being the subject of PZ- 16 -11; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request and have determined that the request meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit to operate a bank with drive - through as shown on the Petitioner's site plan dated June 8, 2011; attached as Exhibit "A" would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Page 2/2 PZ -16 -11 Conditional Use permit to allow operation of a bank with drive - through lanes at 299 West Central Road, as shown on the Site Plan dated June 8, 2011, a copy of which is attached and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE Approval of the Conditional Use is subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Groundwork, Ltd. dated June 8, 2011; and 2. Development of the building in accordance with the elevations prepared by R. Manalang Architect dated June 8, 2011; and 3. Development of the site in general accordance with the landscape plan prepared by Groundwork, Ltd. dated June 8, 2011; and 4. Submittal of a revised photometric (lighting) plan that indicates the site will comply with Village Code requirements. 5. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building and other Village Codes and regulations, which include but not limited to the installation of automatic sprinklers and fire alarm and signage that meet Village Sign Code Regulations. SECTION FOUR The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 2011. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H: \CLK0\WIN \0RDINANCE2 \C USE, VAR- pz16- 11299wCentralRdAug162011.doc Z CE NT RA L R Q I I a nnlvn- rinmuce W a� . �� ° �n •�— LEF, ALI, 4�IPIx ,N .T,IAT4ART4HLl >rll.n�xtxx ��- �y c onnPrnLnWSnn.Gmnml,Arhm + ,/� � � * NORhaW[STLGRNEROVSAIP LOI' I; TNL' NC II SY1VI11 Pl_NC lllx wlSl rINGOF SAN LOTI Q Z — AUISTANCE _!3 MPEET. hItiNTE A}TAI._AY.AL N6 THATlS PERPEM1 ALhIARTO 1E w£:iTLINLOP NAIV LOrI. AUISIANCe4w bTSIFCF L'tiIIINCE NURTIIE� GTExLTALO[N:A LNEW ATIS DRAWN PERPENIN[WLAR TOhlE 3UV31Poi :YICNI.Y LINEOPIpTI,AUISIANEE �' W I GY _ _ or :I TIII:NII nTAIU GAI.lrvvixAiIJI NAwn RYF:nRLY l LOTH'W45r t• W( 7 LIN[OPSAI_LOT l.0.NisIAN[l:oFSbJa FELT'tn Txi lxosiwESnxkTknSi LINx OP SAIo iC {IIH7 folYxl — — LOT I;hIENCENVRhI AL_NG 5<IIIEAT LINNh)hlEh � VIIPSIUkMTAlVBWV131_N � �� DENOTES Of BLULAIIN BNSSRAN_W[LL43 NLRN &xM1IMVN INA1VVdl YNOSYEFI 'IN1'HE VF -- _ - -_ — — STAWNG S£CIIUN I "IOwNSIIV9,NOR,II. MHGE I..—OI"IHETHIRO4HIN[SPAI,6IEAI— $PACE (114.7 I —MIIUT PANTVP 111lIW- 1'r'IIFNEOFIAS LIEA%VxEOALIHiGTIiti NURliI£INEUF —_— -- — I — �n EAx>NL 11.11NG NORI}IWWRI.l—LINE III FEL—IU15VNkOAT RIOILI ANQLEC7 NORfNF]1410.N_PARAiLFL wITHTHE SUUTHwESr un[ovsnlo HlALUTA[[Oxolnu TO � C) ^'I � R� ^p°4 PI. aT_ PSAIU_ S' SNRMTAEVBOM3[ IINRFGISTFRE OINTIIYr1vVICEOPf1IPXI .CISINAR4N `+ l a O ar �wlsal LIUpE A W'iWOIL[ , vuHYl.x£INOISQU nenu.la. l014AS UOCW.wcNl nunucRlR61 ¢ SFlussN A4l LO T ! I 4� mnRa.. C _ ¢ r�a I a L 1•: B i m.aa' i �T hx 0 W O E S o to m w 4.. inn ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR LIGHT STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 299 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Mount Prospect State Bank, a branch of Glenview State Bank, (Petitioner) has filed a petition for Variation for Light Standards to allow light fixtures which are not full cut off for property located at 299 West Central Road (Property) and legally described as: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 246.07 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 67.34 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERY ALONG A LINE THAT IS DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1. A DISTANCE OF 65.76 FEET; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 55.38 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 1 IN BUSSE AND WILLE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MOUNT PROSPECT IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN (EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF THEREOF (AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK) LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 141 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) NORTHEAST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK) ACCORDING TO PLAT OF SAID DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN APRIL 14, 1976 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2863967. Property Index Number: 08 -12- 100 - 012 -0000; and WHEREAS, the "Petitioner" seeks a Variation for Light Standards to allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of PZ -16 -11 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28 day of July, 2011, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13 day of July, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and negative recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect for the request being the subject of PZ- 16 -11; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request and have determined that the request meets the standards of the Village and that granting a Variation to allow light fixtures which are not full cut -off as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" dated November 13, 2009, would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. Page 2/2 PZ -16 -11 SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation for Light Standards to allow light fixtures which are not full cutoff as shown on the light fixture exhibit dated November 13, 2009 a copy of which is attached and made part of as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 2011. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H: \CLKO \WIN \ORDI NANCE2 \VAR- pz16- 11299wCentral RdAug162011.doc y �N =�1 ACCESS DOOR CAST ALUMINUM SOLD ROOF WITH 6ARC45T3 LED SOURCE 96 WATTS, 4500K COLOR TEMPERATURE, IES TYPE III DISTRIBUTION STIPPLED ACRYLIC ACORN LENS DRIVER COMPARTMENT tr 0 M d J \ Q H � W d 0 a, O � I IL o '-' R � (f) n c W U Z m WATTAGE I 96 6ARC45T3 VOLTAGE 120 - 277 ]NISH HK i� 4" TO 3" D1A. TAPERED POLE .125 WALL THICKNESS 6063 -T6 STRUCTURAL GRADE ALUMINUM POLE WELDED FOR SINGLE UNIT CONSTRUCTION ACCESS DOOR SECURED WITH STAINLESS STEEL ALLEN HEAD SCREWS 11 1/2" DIA. BASE, .750 FLOOR THICKNESS 4 ANCHOR BOLTS AND ONE GROUND SCREW Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM Mowat J TO: I MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JULY 29, 2011 SUBJECT: PZ -13 -11 1 950 N. ELMHURST RD.1 CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE- THROUGH LANES) AND VARIATIONS (PARKING LOT SETBACK AND FOUNDATION LANDSCAPING) The petitioner is seeking approval of 1) a Conditional Use to construct a drive - through restaurant, 2) a Variation to decrease the parking lot setback along the north and south property lines, and 3) a Variation to decrease the foundation landscaping along the north, east, and south building elevations. The Petitioner proposes to demolish the existing building and construct a 4,866 square foot drive - through restaurant. As proposed, the restaurant will include two drive - through lanes that would taper down to one lane at the pickup window located along the south property line. A restaurant is a permitted use, but the drive - through lanes require Conditional Use approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the requests on Thursday, July.28, 2011, and by a vote of 7 -0, recommended approval of 1) a Conditional Use to operate a drive - through restaurant, 2) a Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet and six (6) inches along the north property line and from ten (10) feet to three (3) feet and eight (8) inches along the south property line, and 3) a Variation to reduce the foundation landscaping from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet and eleven (11) inches wide along the north building elevation, eight (8) feet wide along the east building elevation, and zero (0) feet along the south building elevation,' subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Report and the following additional conditions: • The installation of a six (6) foot tall privacy fence along the north property line; and • The installation of tall evergreen shrubs along the north property line. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their August 16, 2011 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. WC14 6w--� — William J. tooney, Jr., t ICP RTLANNPIanning & Zoning COMW&Z 201 MM Mem TZ -13.1 1 959 N. Elmhum Rd. (CU & VAPU)Ad MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -13 -11 Hearing Date: July 28, 2011 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 950 N. Elmhurst Road - PETITIONER: Chick -fil -A, Inc. PUBLICATION DATE: June 8, 2011 PIN NUMBER: 03 -27- 307 - 024 -0000 REQUESTS: 1) Conditional Use. for a drive- through 2) Variation to decrease the parking lot setback 3) Variation to decrease the foundation landscaping 4) Variation to increase the number of wall signs 5) Variation to increase the number of menu boards MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Rogers, Chair William Beattie Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Theo Foggy Ronald Roberts Keith Youngquist MEMBER ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Consuelo Andrade, Development Review Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Jason Hill, Girish Zaveri, Steve Lewis, John Anda Chairman Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:33p.m. Mr. Floros made a motion, seconded by Mr. Donnelly to approve the minutes of the May 26, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting; the minutes were approved 5 -0 with Mr. Roberts and Mr. Foggy abstaining. Chairman Rogers explained that the June 23, 2011 Planning & Zoning Meeting was continued to the July 28, 2011 meeting because Village Hall lost power due to a confirmed tornado that struck the Village. Chairman Rogers expressed his appreciation and gratitude towards the public servants of the community for their efforts with cleaning up the Village after the storm. After hearing one (1) previous case, Chairman Rogers introduced Case PZ- 13 -11, 950 N. Elmhurst Road, at 7:43 p.m. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner for PZ -13 -11 was seeking Conditional Use approval to construct a drive - through restaurant and Variations for the property 950 N. Elmhurst. Ms. Andrade said the Subject Property has street frontage along Rand Road and Elmhurst Road, and contains a multi- tenant building with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned B4 Corridor Commercial and is bordered to the north by the RX Single Family Residence, to the west and east by the B3 Community Shopping, and B4 Corridor Commercial to the south. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner proposed to demolish the existing multi - tenant building and construct a drive - through restaurant with related improvements. The proposed site plan indicated that a 4,866 square foot building would be constructed on the east half of the Subject Property. The restaurant would include two (2) drive- through Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -13 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page I of 6 lanes that would taper down to one (1) lane at the pickup window along the south .building elevation. Conditional Use approval is required for the drive- through lanes. Ms. Andrade said as currently designed, parking spaces would be provided along the -north property line and on the west half of the property. The parking lot - setbacks to the west and east property lines would comply with the Village Code's minimum ten (10) foot parking lot setback requirement. The parking lot setbacks along the north and south property lines required Variation approval to allow a six (6) foot and six (6) inch setback along the north property Iine and a three (3) foot and eight (8) inch setback along the south property line. Ms. Andrade said the site plan indicated one of the two existing access drives located on Rand Road would be closed off and that the existing access drive located on Elmhurst Road will be maintained. She explained that Rand Road and Elmhurst Road are under the Illinois Department of Transportation's jurisdiction, and that approval from IDOT will be required for any work within the right -of -way and items regarding lane configuration. Ms. Andrade stated the proposed elevations indicated the building would be constructed out of brick veneer, a metal roof and canopies. The building height would measure twenty -four (24) feet at its highest point. Ms. Andrade showed a picture elevations fronting both Elmhurst Road and Rand Road. Ms. Andrade said the north building elevation would include the main entrance to the restaurant. She referenced an image that illustrated the south building elevation which would include the pick -up window. Ms. Andrade stated as proposed, the number of wall signs and menu board signs exceeded the number permitted by the Village Sign Code. The elevation drawings illustrate a total of five (5) wall signs, when in this case one (1) per building elevation would be permitted for a total of four (4) wall signs. In addition to the wall signs, the Petitioner proposed to install two (2) menu boards, one (1) for each drive- through lane, when the Sign Code permits only one (1) menu board for a drive- through restaurant. The Petitioner was seeking Variations to allow a second menu board measuring twenty -two (22) square feet and a fifth wall sign measuring about thirty-seven (37) square feet that would wrap around the north corner of the building. Ms. Andrade said the fifth wall sign failed to meet the standards for a Variation because there were no hardships as defined by the Sign Code. The building characteristics are not unique which would warrant the additional wall sign. The proposed building elevations show one principal wall sign identifying the business name, which would reasonably identify the business from Rand and Elmhurst Roads. Staff was not supportive of the request to increase the number of wall signs. Ms. Andrade stated the second menu board was warranted as the proposal included two (2) drive- through lanes versus a typical drive - through restaurant with only one (1) drive- through lane. Staff recommended approval of the second menu board. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner submitted a landscape plan detailing the proposed plant materials and sizes. The landscape plan would be required to be revised to provide additional plantings to comply with the landscape requirements and required Variation approval to reduce the required foundation landscaping from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet and eleven (11) inches wide along the north building elevation, eight (8) feet wide along the east building elevation and to allow a zero (0) foot foundation landscaping along the south building elevation. Foundation landscaping was not proposed along the south building elevation due to the pickup window and escape lane Ms. Andrade stated the standards for Conditional Uses are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following is a summary of these findings: Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -13 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 2 of 6 * The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • And that adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets are provided. Ms. Andrade said the drive - through lanes have been designed to be located on the south side of the building as to not have a detrimental impact on the residential properties to the north. The Petitioner's plans included .closing one of the two existing drives located on Rand Road to ensure safe access to the site. Also, signage and striping would be added to ensure safe and efficient traffic circulation within the site. The use as a drive - through restaurant complied with the Comprehensive Plan and would be constructed according to Village Codes. Ms. Andrade stated the standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven (7) specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The summary of these findings included: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character Ms. Andrade said the Subject Property has an irregular shape, which created challenges in complying with all Village Code requirements. Prior to submittal, the Petitioner discussed the proposal with Staff on numerous occasions and designed the proposal to minimize the scope and number of Variations. As designed, the building and parking spaces complied with the Code requirements, but the parking lot setbacks and foundation landscaping fall short of the minimum ten (10) feet required. The proposal would accommodate the projected traffic volumes and satisfy the restaurant's peak parking demand, which exceeded the minimum number of spaces required by fifteen (15) spaces. Also, the Petitioner intended to increase the quantity and quality of the perimeter landscaping along the north properly line to mitigate the impact of the parking lot setback. Village Staff has reviewed the Variation requests and believed that it would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. Ms. Andrade stated based on these findings, Staff recommended that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval for the Conditional Use for a drive- through, Variation to decrease the parking lot setback, and a Variation to decrease the foundation landscaping. The Village Board's decision is final for these motions. Ms. Andrade said in regards to the sign requests, Staff recommended that the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the Variation to increase the number of menu boards; however, Staff recommended that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the Variation to increase the number of wall signs. The Planning and Zoning Commission's decision is final for the sign requests. Mr. Youngquist asked if there is an existing fence along the north property line. Ms. Andrade stated there is an existing fence along the north property line. Chairman Rogers swore in Jason Hill of Woolpert, I815 S. Meyers Road, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois. Mr. Hill said that his company is the Civil Engineer for the proposed restaurant. He stated the site configuration is challenging as the lot is an irregular shape. Mr. Hill said that his company has done its best to fit an efficient Chick -fil -A prototype on the proposed site. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -13 -11 PIanning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 3 of 6 Mr. Hill .discussed the interior and exterior layout of the proposed restaurant .along with the drive - through lanes. He stated that landscaping plans and traffic plans have recently been resubmitted to the Village that addresses initial concerns and questions. Mr. Hill said that they tried to place the parking and drive- through as far away from the residential properties as they could. Mr. Hill discussed the Petitioner's request for the fifth wall sign. He stated -that this is the company's tag sign'and was needed for two reasons. The first reason was to show its presence with the tag line. The second reason was to make the curve of the building more appealing. Without the tag line, the building wall would look naked or blank. Mr. Beattie asked about the Petitioner's willingness to place additional landscaping along the north property line. Mr. Hill said that additional trees would be added beyond what was originally submitted. He stated that the area is tight due to the six (6) foot tall fence that is located on the Subject Property. Mr. Hill said a shrub line would be added along the entire north property line. Mr. Beattie asked if evergreen trees were considered for screening. Mr. Hill stated that evergreens could be considered, however, that may eliminate other plantings there were proposed. There was discussion whether the fence would remain as is or be moved to the property line. Mr. Floros asked if the fence was on the Subject Property. W. Hill responded that the fence encroaches two (2) feet onto the Subject Property. Mr. Hill said that he would work with the neighboring property owner on a solution for the fence and additional screening. Mr. Donnelly asked why the Petitioner needed two (2) message boards instead of one (1). Mr. Hill stated that the two (2) ordering stations increase the through put in the drive- through by thirty (30) percent. He said it allows for more efficient circulation of traffic on the site. Mr. Hill stated approximately sixty -five (65) percent of Chick -fil- A's business is via the drive- through. Mr. Beattie asked what the hours of operation are for the proposed restaurant. Mr. Hill said between 6:30 . a.m. and 10:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday; the restaurant is closed on Sunday. Chairman Rogers questioned what was sold at the restaurant. Mr. Hill stated that the restaurant is known for its chicken breast sandwich. There are other items on the menu, but the food is primarily chicken. Chairman Rogers discussed the Village's stance on wall signs and said he could not support the request for five (5) wall signs and asked the Petitioner if they would be willing to eliminate one (1) wall sign. Mr. Hill stated that he would be open to eliminating the wall sign on the west elevation in order to allow the wrap around tag sign. There was general agreement amongst the Commission to allow the wrap around tag sign in exchange for eliminating the sign on the west elevation. Mr. Beattie stated by moving the fence along the north property line would allow the Petitioner to install additional landscaping. Mr. Hill said that he would do whatever it would take to provide the screening that is needed for the property owner to the north. He stated that he could work with Staff to incorporate additional green space alternatives. There was discussion about possibly a taller fence; however, a Variation would be required for anything taller than a six (6) foot fence. Mr. Hill stated that the Petitioner would construct a brand new six (6) foot fence and provide whatever relief in Iandscaping the property to the north would need. Mr. Donnelly asked if the parking lot would still connect to the property (Firestone) to the south. Mr. Hill stated that there is a cross - access agreement currently in place and the agreement would be maintained. Mr. Youngquist said the fence would have to be moved to the property line to allow the additional landscaping to be installed. Chairman Rogers discussed the need for a second menu board. Mr. Hill explained the difference between the main menu board and the secondary menu boards. The main menu board is under the canopy; the secondary Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -13 -1 I Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 4 of 6 menu board is posted outside the canopy and is a truncated version of the main menu board. The second menu board is necessary due to the two (2) ordering stations. The main menu board cannot be seen from the second canopy station. Chairman Rogers swore in Girish Zaveri, 1002 N. Meadow Lane, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Zaveri stated that his property is directly north of the Subject Property. He was concerned with the number of Variations and the Conditional Use tieing requested. Mr. Zaveri said his neighbors were also concerned and signed and submitted a petition to the Commission. Chairman Rogers confirmed that a copy of the petition has been received by the Commission. Mr. Zaveri was concerned with his privacy and safety and believed the proposed use would reduce his property value. He stated the fence that was previously discussed is five (5) feet in height, not six (6) feet as discussed. Mr. Donnelly asked Mr. Zaveri if he would have any issues to a six (6) foot fence being built at the property line. He said no, but his concern was with the amount of traffic and . exhaust that would be on site. Mr. Beattie confirmed with the homeowner that the drive- through was being proposed for the south side of the building. Mr. Zaveri understood and there was general discussion regarding the parking lot as it existed and as it is proposed. Chairman Rogers advised Mr. Zaveri that the Petitioner has agreed to install a six (6) foot fence in addition to placing taller landscaping that would screen above the height of the fence. Mr. Zaveri said the fence and additional screening and fence is nice, but he believed that it would not cut down on noise.. There was additional discussion regarding circulation on the proposed site. Chairman Rogers swore in Steve Lewis of Chick -fil -A, 5200 Buffington Road, Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Lewis agreed and requested support from the Commission to allow the wall tag sign in lieu of the sign on the west elevation. He stated that Chick -fil -A would move and install a six (6) foot fence on the property line. Mr. Lewis said in addition to the additional landscaping on the Chick -fil -A property, Chick -fil -A would work with the property owner to the north on installing additional landscaping on the homeowner's property. There was additional discussion regarding Chick- fil -A's background and existing Chicago area locations. Chairman Rogers swore in John Anda, 950 N. Elmhurst Road, Mount Prospect, IIlinois. Mr. Anda stated that his business is at the Subject Property and his interest was more with the timeframe of the proposed project if it was approved. Mr. Lewis stated that Chick -fil -A would avoid any construction during the winter; construction would not be even considered until Spring 2012 (mid- April). Mr. Lewis said it is approximately a four (4) month construction process to build a restaurant; they would be looking to open in August 2012. Chairman Rogers asked if there was anyone else in the audience to address this case. Hearing none, he closed the public portion of the case at 8:21 p.m. and brought the discussion back to the board. Chairman Rogers made a motion, seconded by Mr. Donnelly to approve: 1) A Conditional Use to operate a drive- through restaurant; 2) A Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet and six (6) inches along the north property line and from ten (10) feet to three (3) feet and eight (8) inches along the south property line; 3) A Variation to reduce the foundation landscaping from ten 00) feet to six (6) feet and eleven (11) inches wide along the north building elevation, eight (8) feet wide along the east building elevation, and zero (0) feet along the south building elevation, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report and the following additional conditions: a. The installation of tall evergreen shrubs along the north property Iine; and b. The installation of .a six (6) foot tall privacy fence along the north property line. Richard Rogers; Chair PZ -13 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 5 of 6 4) A Variation request to increase the number of menu boards from one to two as shown on the attached exhibit. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Donnelly, Floros, Foggy, Roberts, Youngquist, Rogers NAYS: None Motion was approved 7 -0. The Village Board's decision is final for item numbers 1 -3. Item 4 was Planning and Zoning Commission Final. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. FIoros to approve a Variation request to increase the number. of wall signs from four (4) to five (5) in order to allow a thirty seven (37) square feet wall sign to wrap around the north corner of the building. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES:. Donnelly, Roberts, Floros NAYS: Beattie, Foggy, Youngquist, Rogers Motion was denied 4 -3. The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision for this motion was final. Mr. Beattie made a motion, seconded by Mr. Donnelly to allow a thirty -seven (37) square foot wail sign to wrap around the north east corner of the building in lieu of the permitted sign on the west elevation along Rand Road. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Donnelly, Floros, Foggy, Roberts, Youngquist, Rogers NAYS: None Motion was approved 7 -0. The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision for this motion was final. After hearing two (2) additional cases, Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Foggy to adjourn at 11:15 p.m. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. A/�� Ryan Kast, Community Development Administrative Assistant. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -13 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 6 of 6 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -13 -11 LOCATION: 950 N. Elmhurst Road PETITIONER: Chick -fil -A, Inc. OWNER: S.A. Challenger, Inc. PARCEL #: 03 -27 -307- 024 -0000 LOT SIZE: 1.5 acres (65,139 sq.ft.) ZONING: B4 Corridor Commercial LAND USE: Commercial REQUEST: 1) Conditional Use for a drive - through 2) Variation to decrease the parking lot setback 3) Variation to decrease the foundation landscaping 4) Variation to increase the number of wall signs 5) Variation to increase the number of menu boards LOCATION MAP T RUE kr�r,_. VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON FROM: CONSUELO ANDRADE, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER DATE: JUNE 6, 2011 HEARING DATE: JUNE 23, 2011 SUBJECT: PZ -13 -11 / 950 N. ELMHURST RD.1 CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE- THROUGH) & VARIATIONS (PARKING LOT SETBACK, FOUNDATION LANDSCAPING & SIGNAGE) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the June 23, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Chick -fil -A (the "Petitioner ") regarding the property located at 950 N. Elmhurst Road (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use to constructea drive - through restaurant and a Variation to decrease the required parking lot setback and foundation landscaping. Additionally, the Petitioner is requesting sign Variations to increase the number of permitted wall signs and menu boards. P &Z hearing was properly noticed in the June 8, 2011 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is a through lot with street frontage along Rand Road and Elmhurst Road, and contains a multi - tenant building with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned B4 Corridor Commercial and is bordered to the north by the RX Single Family Residence, to the west and east by the B3 Community Shopping, and B4 Corridor Commercial to the south. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner proposes to demolish the existing multi- tenant building and construct a drive - through restaurant with related improvements. As proposed, the project requires Conditional Use approval for the drive- through lanes and a Variation to the required parking lot setback, foundation landscaping, and signage. The various elements of the proposal are outlined below: Site Plan The proposed site plan indicates that a 4,866 square foot building will be constructed on the east half of the Subject property. The restaurant will include two drive- through lanes that would taper down to one lane at the pickup window and an escape lane located along the south building elevation. Conditional Use approval is required for the drive - through lanes. As currently designed, parking spaces would be provided along the north property line and to the west of the proposed building. The parking lot setbacks to the west and east property lines will comply with the Village PZ -13 -11 PIanning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 23, 2011 page 3 Code's minimum ten (10) foot parking lot setback requirement. The parking Iot setbacks to the north and south property Iines as shown would be six (6) feet and six (6) inches and three (3) feet and eight (8) inches respectively. Variation approval is required to reduce the parking lot setback from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet and six (6) inches along the north property line and to three (3) feet and eight (8) inches along the east half of the south property line. The Subject Property currently includes two access drives on Rand Road and one signalized access drive off Elmhurst Road. As proposed, the southern access drive on Rand Road will be eliminated and the northern access drive wiII remain. The signalized access drive on Elmhurst Road will remain. Parking — The Village Code requires twelve (12) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for a drive - through restaurant. The proposed 4,866 square foot restaurant requires fifty eight (58) parking spaces. The Petitioner's proposal will meet the required parking spaces by providing a total of seventy three (73) parking spaces. The Village Code also requires eight (8) stacking spaces for the first window and two (2) stacking spaces for each additional window. The Petitioner's proposal indicates two drive - through lanes, and will require a total of ten (10) stacking spaces. The proposal would comply with the required vehicle stacking. Traffic - The Petitioner submitted a traffic impact study. The study concluded that the intersections providing access to the Subject Property are and will continue operating at acceptable levels of service, and that the proposed design will be adequate to accommodate the projected traffic volumes and the restaurant's peak parking demand. The Village's Traffic Engineer is currently reviewing the traffic study. The proposal will be required to address any comments from the Village Traffic Engineer. Trash Enclosure - The site plan indicates a trash enclosure will be located to the west of the building. Details on the trash enclosure were not submitted, Staff recommends the Petitioner construct a trash enclosure to match the principal building. The enclosure will be required to be a minimum of six (6) feet in height and detail drawings indicating the height and materials will be required at time of building permit. Buildina Elevations - The attached elevations indicate the proposed building would be constructed out of brick veneer, a metal roof, coping and canopies. As shown, the building height would measure twenty four (24) feet at its highest point. Landscaping - The attached landscape plan details the proposed plant materials and sizes. As currently drawn, the landscape plan does not comply with the landscape requirements. The landscape plan shall be revised to address the following Village Staff comments: 1. Replacing the Princeton Elm trees, which are prohibited, with permitted shade trees. 2. Providing a minimum of 50% of live coverage, including a mixture of plantings, in the landscape island adjacent to the north of the drive - though (showing three shade trees). 3. Providing a minimum of nine (9) shade trees of not more than fifty (50) feet apart in the perimeter landscape area located along the north property line. 4. Replacing the four (4) foot tall emerald arborvitae and thirty (30) inch high northern bayberry with shrubs that are a minimum of six (6) feet in height or installing a six foot (6) tall fence in addition to the proposed shrubs in the perimeter landscape area located along the north property line. S. Providing landscaping across a minimum 50% in the perimeter landscape areas located along the west, south, and east property Iines. Plantings shall be a minimum height of three (3) feet and contain seven (7) to nine (9) shrubs per cluster. Clusters to be spaced no more than thirty five (35) feet apart along the property line. PZ -13 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 23, 2011 Page 4 6. Replacing the groundcover and perennials proposed at the base of each freestanding sign with evergreen shrubs. The Village Code requires a minimum of ten (10) feet foundation landscaping around the perimeter of the building. As proposed, the foundation landscape along the north and east building elevation range from six (6) feet and eleven (11) inches to eight (8) feet wide. Foundation landscaping is not proposed along the south building elevation due to the pickup window and escape lane. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to reduce the required foundation landscaping from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet and eleven (11) inches wide along the north building elevation, eight (8) feet wide along the east building elevation and to allow a zero (0) foot foundation landscaping along the south building elevation. The Zoning Ordinance requires the installation of an automatic underground sprinkling system. An irrigation plan was not submitted and will be required for the proposed development. Lighting Plan — Per the site and photometric plans, nine (9) new parking lot lights will be installed. As shown, the photometric plan indicates light levels that exceed the Village Code limitations on lighting. The light levels at the north property line exceed the maximum .I foot - candles permitted, and the light levels at the west, south, and east property line exceed the maximum .5 foot - candles permitted. The light levels within the parking lot areas also do not comply with the Village Code as they exceed the maximum of 2.4 foot - candles permitted. Fixture cut sheets were not provided for the parking lot light and wall mounted fixtures. The Petitioner is not seeking relief from the Village's lighting regulations and is required to modify the plan and submit fixture cut sheets to comply with Sections 14.314 and 14.2219 prior to permit approval. Siege — The attached sign package illustrates the proposed signs for the Subject Property. As proposed, the number of wall signs and menu board signs exceed the number permitted by the Village Sign Code. The sign package illustrates a total of five (5) wall signs, when in this case one per building elevation would be permitted for a total of four (4) wall signs. An extra wall sign measuring about thirty seven (37) square feet is shown to wrap around the north corner of the building, which requires Variation approval. In addition to the wall signs, the sign package illustrates freestanding signs, which include main identification, directional, and menu boards. Each drive- through lane includes a menu board sign measuring about twenty two (22) square feet, when the Sign Code permits only one menu board for a drive - through restaurant. The Petitioner is seeking Variations to allow the second wall sign and menu board. The remainder of the proposed signs will be required to comply with the Village Sign Code regulations. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Land Use Map designates the Subject Property as Community Commercial. The Petitioner's proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The Subject Property is zoned B4 Corridor Commercial. Per the Plat of Survey attached, the Subject Property currently does not comply with the Village Code's requirements in regards to setbacks and lot coverage. The existing building is setback only one (1) foot from the south property line when the Code require minimum of ten (10) feet. The Village Code also requires a minimum ten (10) foot setback for parking lots. The existing parking lot setbacks range from zero (0) to five (5) feet. The existing overall lot coverage is approximately ninety six (96) percent, which exceeds the maximum seventy -five percent (75 %) permitted by Code. The proposed redevelopment will bring the property closer into compliance with Code. The proposed lot coverage as noted on the site plan is incorrectly listed as 44,187 square feet when it measures out to 49,053 square feet or 75.3 %. The lot coverage shall be reduced by two hundred and five (205) square feet to comply with the PZ -13 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 23, 2011 Page 5 maximum seventy -five percent (75 %) permitted by Code. As previously noted, the Petitioner is seeking a Variation to reduce the parking lot setbacks along the north and south property Iines. CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are Iisted in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and The petitioner's request to construct a drive - through restaurant meets the standards for a Conditional Use. The drive - through lanes have been designed to be located on the south side of the building as to not have a detrimental impact on the residential properties to the north. The Petitioner's plans include closing one of the two existing drives located on Rand Road to ensure safe access to the site. Also, signage and striping will be added to ensure safe and efficient traffic circulation within the site. The use as a drive - through restaurant complies with the Comprehensive Plan and will be constructed according to Village Codes. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: • Would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Subject Property has an irregular shape, which create challenges in complying with all Village Code requirements. Prior to submittal, the Petitioner discussed the proposal with Staff on numerous occasions and designed the proposal to minimize the scope and number of Variations. As designed, the building and parking spaces comply with the Code requirements, but the parking lot setbacks and foundation landscaping fall short of the minimum ten (10) foot required. However, the proposal would accommodate the projected traffic volumes and satisfy the restaurant's peak parking demand, which exceed the minimum number of spaces required by fifteen (15) spaces. Also, the Petitioner intends the increase the quantity and quality of the perimeter landscaping along the north property line to mitigate the impact of the parking lot setback. Village Staff has reviewed the Variation requests and believes that it would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. SIGN VARIATION STANDARDS Required findings for sign variations are contained in Section 7.725 of the Village of Mount Prospect Sign Code. The section contains specific findings, listed below, that must be made in order to approve a variation: PZ -13 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 23, 2011 Page 6 • The sign allowed under code regulations will not reasonably identify the business; • The hardship is created by unique circumstances and not serve as a convenience to the petitioner, and is not created by the person presently having an interest in the sign or property; • The variation will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood; and • The variation will not impair visibility to the adjacent property, increase the danger of traffic problems or endanger the public safety, or alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and be in harmony with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. The Petitioner proposes to install a wall sign with the company's motto, " The original chicken sandwich ", at the north corner of the building. The Petitioner is seeking relief from Sign code regulations that limit the maximum number of wall signs in order to allow this additional wall sign. The Variation request to increase the number of permitted wall signs fails to meet the standards for a Variation because there is no hardship as defined by the Sign Code. The building characteristics are not unique which would warrant the additional wall sign. The proposed building elevations are shown with one principal wall sign identifying the business name, which would reasonably identify the business from Rand and Elmhurst Roads. Therefore, staff recommends denial of the requested Variation to increase the number of wall signs. The petitioner is also seeking zoning relief to allow two menu boards versus one. The need for the second menu board is warranted as the proposal includes two drive - through lanes versus a typical drive - through restaurant with only one drive - through lane. Staff recommends approval of the second menu board. RECOMMENDATION Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motions: "To approve: 1) A Conditional Use to operate a drive- through restaurant; 2) A Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet and six (6) inches along the north property Iine and from ten (10) feet to three (3) feet and eight (8) inches along the south property line; 3) A Variation to reduce the foundation landscaping from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet and eleven (11) inches wide along the north building elevation, eight (8) feet wide along the east building elevation, and zero (0) feet along the south building elevation; subject to the following conditions: a. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Woolpert, Inc. dated May 11, 2011. b. Development of the building in conformance with the elevations prepared by Chipman Design Architecture, Inc. dated April 27, 2011. c. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by Woolpert, Inc. dated May 11, 2011, but revised to comply with Code d. The lane located south of the pickup window lane remains as a pass -thru lane. e. Submittal of a photometric (lighting) plan and fixture cut sheets that indicate the site will comply with Village Code requirements. f Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy, the Petitioner shall complete a Plat of Easements, which addresses staff's review comments on utility and access easements. g. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village Codes and regulations including signage. PZ -13 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting June 23, 2011 The Village Board's decision is final for the motions above. Page 7 Based on the Staff's review of the proposed signs, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission gonrove the following motion: "To approve: 1. A Variation request to increase the number of menu boards from one to two as shown on the attached exhibit. Based on the Staff's review of the proposed signs, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the following motion: "To approve: A Variation request to increase the number of wall signs to allow a thirty seven (37) square feet wall sign to wrap around the north corner of the building as shown on the attached exhibit. The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision is final for this sign requests. I concur: William J Cooney, AI P Director of Communi Development H."TLANTlanning &Zoning COM1 T&Z 20[Wta1rRepo"WZ -13 -11 950 N. F]mh —I R-d(CU O;i-- hl.ugh & VAR -L nd..ping, Padting Sel—,k & Si").do VILLAGE OF MOUNIT PROSPECT 5 0 S. Fnierson Street Ndount Prospecl, Illinois 60056 FA 8 FAX 847.818.5329 RECEIVED Zoning ReqLICSt Application 0 0 O Case NUMbel 11&Z 3 Developili NiannjAddress Date or Submission I I-caring Date is ZONING REQUEST (s): Con(litiowil Use for Drive-through restaurant E) toning Nap Amendment: From to Variation from Sec,_14.2307, 14-2217, 7.305B Text Amendment: Section(s) 7.325C (Office Onl • P & Z Final 0 • Villagc Board Final El SUMMAWfY OF REQUESTED Conditional Use approval for a drive - th rough and dine-in establishment in the B4 zoning district. Variations for reduction in foundation planting requirement (141 17) reduction in 10' parking setback along the north & south property lines (14.2217), additional menu board/ordering station (7.325C), & additional building.wall sign (7.305B). Z� t7l Z. Name Telcpholle (day) 0 Scott Tatman 404.305.4594 Telephone (evening) Chick -fit -A, Inc. 0 404.291.6471 Street Address Fax 5200 Buffington Road 5 -ec City State f ile Code 0 1 Atlanta GA :4 Interest ill Propci-ty -1! Contract purchaser Mount Prospect Departllwnt of Community Development 50 S011111 1 Street. ]MOUnt Prospect Illinois www, 1114) U litprospect. 01 a 404.684.8550 Email �cqttRat a�n @chick-fil-a.corn Phone 847.818,5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392,6064 L r ;upcuV oN sarr;e_s anancani j s - ~ Corporation O o i 14 S.A. Chal lenger, Inc. (a i4lN corporation) Street Address - 28 W. Madison I �stai:. iiz C:aue Oak Park II. 60302 1'elephortu (play) 708.358 Tolepltone (cvcning) t-ax 708.386.0 daniel.lawlor(ausbank.com Mount Praspcct Department of Community Development IR �0PV Phone 847.8 19. 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Lf Pax 847.813.5329 NvwW.mountprospect.org 2 VILLAGE OF TDD847.392.6064 PVT. PROSPEC Address(es) (Street Number, Street) 150 W. Rand Road and 950 N. Elmhurst Road Lot Area (Sq. Ft ) Zoning District Total Building Sc3. f t. 1 - Sy. Ft. Devoted to Proposed 24,050 Use 24,050 65,139 _v.. _ B4...._..__W.____.__._. Scthacls: ` _ Fro Rear (Rand Rd) [tear Side Side _ 60.4 (Elmhurst Rd NIA — 25.4 (north) 0' (south) — d Building height Lot Coverage ( ° /n) Standard Parking Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces it M 241" 96.3 - - -- - — — -- - 2 1 Adjacent land Uses: w North - - - - -- South Residential � Commercial 1 Elmhurst Road _ _Rand Road Property Index Number(s): 0 3 -- 2 7 -- Z -- 0 2 4 (attach additional sheets if necessary) - - - -- �o a Legal Description attach additional sleets if necessary) Lot l in Rand - Elmhur Subdivision, being a subd of_p�rt of the East U of the v� - So 1/4 of Section 27, Township 42 N, Range, I 1 E, o the Third Principal Meridian, in the U r Village of Mount Prospect, accordinp_to the plat thereof recorded December 18, 1968, as 3 document 20707569, in Cook County, Illinois. Mount Praspcct Department of Community Development IR �0PV Phone 847.8 19. 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Lf Pax 847.813.5329 NvwW.mountprospect.org 2 VILLAGE OF TDD847.392.6064 PVT. PROSPEC Proposed Use (as listed in the zoning district) � ys Drive - through and dine - in establishment — - _— Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Mects the Standards For the Zoning Request A roval ( attach additional sheets if necessary) The 4,8� s Chick -fil-a is a nick- service dine-in restauran with a drive - through and outdoor W seat ing area. See attached responses to Standards for Conditional Use Approval and Var iations. LT�Ln O� �a �o v� U r 3 lluurs of Operation 6:00 AM - 10:00 PM Monday thru Saturday, Closed Su nday Mount Praspcct Department of Community Development IR �0PV Phone 847.8 19. 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Lf Pax 847.813.5329 NvwW.mountprospect.org 2 VILLAGE OF TDD847.392.6064 PVT. PROSPEC O > 14 CO < Attorney Manic - N/A Address S 11 ry CY0 1. Naine WoolpeM Inc, Address 1815 S. Meyers Road, Suite 120 Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 ---- 1 -- -• Nanic _)Yo!21p.Sq, - Inc - . - Jaso - Hi - - Address 1815 S. Meyers Road, Suite 120 _ Chipman Desi an Adch 1550 N. Northwest Highway, Suite ........... Naln, - WqolpqLt, Inc- Adilros's .,- _18 S. Meyers Road, Suite 120 Oa Lib-t-o-Qk—T-QLr—a(-z�iL-60 1-8.1. Telephone (dqy) Fax Ernilil lVepholle(de,Y) 630-424.9080 rax Adclrcs i t:s) Num bt:r, Stj-uej) F.1-flail steve.kr Telqllollc (day) 150 W. Rand Road and 950 N. Elmhurst Road Fax 630.495.3731 " �5:139 Zoning- District T; 3 U Fa\ 847.298.6966 B4 i 4,866 (J'se 4,866 - Telephone (day)_ 630.424.9080 Fax C C 06Y (Rand Rd) Jasc,n..hjj@Yq_qlpert.COM S;tdQ ' ?A `�7 4' Ino-Ah) - . k 26-Y(south) 24'- 1 0 : ' . 1, - ,w ;'Um max. 75.0 70 Developer Dame N/A (day) Address Fax O > 14 CO < Attorney Manic - N/A Address S 11 ry CY0 1. Naine WoolpeM Inc, Address 1815 S. Meyers Road, Suite 120 Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 ---- 1 -- -• Nanic _)Yo!21p.Sq, - Inc - . - Jaso - Hi - - Address 1815 S. Meyers Road, Suite 120 _ Chipman Desi an Adch 1550 N. Northwest Highway, Suite ........... Naln, - WqolpqLt, Inc- Adilros's .,- _18 S. Meyers Road, Suite 120 Oa Lib-t-o-Qk—T-QLr—a(-z�iL-60 1-8.1. Telephone (dqy) Fax Ernilil lVepholle(de,Y) 630-424.9080 rax 630.495.3731 F.1-flail steve.kr Telqllollc (day) 630.693 Fax 630.495.3731 Email jasotqill@ coni Telephone (day) 847-298.6900 Fa\ 847.298.6966 I saj!qc�r @chiPTan tsi,gnarch. - Telephone (day)_ 630.424.9080 Fax 630.495.3731 P-111,01 Jasc,n..hjj@Yq_qlpert.COM I i r.=p \IOLLIlt Prospect Departm OfConimijn�ty Dcveloplilmit TD w South Einerson Street, NlowL Illinois L P L i - - p, � -\� t 7 Phone 847,818-1328 50 South 3 LF Fax 84 7. 8 19. i.' 3 29 VILLAGE OF TDD 847,392-6064 P"T PROSPECT Please note that the application will not be reviewed -until this petition has been fully completed and ail required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Coin munity Development Department's Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. 11 is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time Of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the my knowledge. Applicant -- Date - (signature) Print Name I s 7 K' If applicant is not property owner: QUOwi,%Z I hereby desfit the applicant. to seek#rg the zoning request(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. $Y� ha tiP.v Pmt',) G., MOtAtSbX CVrPQ(A+i0A Property Owner Da te )�c �' Ci (signature) Print Name Z>c tAW �AEJI��, yicep F iJ Q 4 \J7 0 s� t T VI LLAGE OF MT PRO S�'cCT Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mouiitprospect.org 4 TDD 847.3916064 THE GRANTOR, The Judicial Saies Corporation, an Illinois Corporation, f pursuant to and under the authority conferred J Doc#: 1022810036 Fee: $42.00 by the provisions of an Order Appointing EQgene "gene" Moore RIHSP Fee:$10.0C Selling Officer and a Judgment entered by Cook County Recorder of Deeds the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, I Date: 06 1 1 61201003:21 PM Pg. t ot4 on April 15, 2010, in Case No. 09 CH 51145, entitled U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A - = a �� NATIONAL~ • `: BANKING ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR-IN- INTEREST TO THE , FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE Mf '" � t °'"� £ � ;J ��` t � CORPORATION, RECEIVER FOR PARK NATIONAL BANK F/K/A PARK NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST OF CHICAGO vs. NORTH STAR TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE OF TRUST NO. 10129 U/T /A DATED 12120/1993, et a[, and pursuant to which the premises hereinafter described were sold at public sale pursuant to notice given in compliance with 735 ILCS 5115 - 1507(c) by said grantor on May 24, 2010, does hereby grant, transfer, and convey to SA CHALLENGER, INC, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, by assignment the following described real estate situated in the County of Cook, in the State of Illinois, to have and to hold forever: PARCEL 1 LOT t IN RANI? - ELMHURST SUBDIVISION BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 1I EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER is, 1968 AS DOCUMENT 20707569 IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: EASEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY PURPOSES, INGRESS AND EGRESS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 AFORESAID, AS CREATED BY DEED FROM F.C. BREHM, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 1, 1958 AND KNOWN AS TRUST No. 580 TO THE FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY RECORDED JANUARY 18, 1965 AS DOCUMENT NO 19358929, OVER: THE SOUTHWEST 10 FEET AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHWEST LINE (EXCEPT THE SOUTHEAST 45 FEET THEREOF) THE NORTHWEST 25 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 45 FEET AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHEAST LINE, AND THE WEST 25 FEET OF THE EAST 45 FEET LYING WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF ELMHURST ROAD (EXCEPT THE AFOREDESCRIBED SOUTHEAST 45 FEET THEREOF) OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND: THAT PART OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION Z7, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING 198.97 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27: THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SAID CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD, 439.93 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON A STRAIGHT LINE THAT IF EXTENDED WOULD INTERSECT THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST 112 OF THE 50UTHWEST 114 OF SA111 SECTION 27 AT A DISTANCE OF 439.93 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE SAID EAST LINE WITH THE CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD, FOR A DISTANCE OF 17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES'; Q THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 1".03 FEF- I',THENCF NORTHEASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 249.60 FEET TO THE POINT ON THE AFORESAID EAST LINE OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 27; THENCE SOUTHWARD ALONG THE SAID EAST LIME A DISTANCE OF 205.00 FEET TO THE POINT BEING 439.93 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE SAID EAST LINE OF THE CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 170.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF HERETOFORE DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAYS) IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Commonly known as 950 NORTH ELMHURST ROAD, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Property Index No. 03- 27- 307 -024 Grantor has caused its name to be signed to those present by its Chief Executive Officer on this 16th day of July, 20 10, VIL LAGE OF 0 tSi3NY l�RCiS�§ Cr iy1� tf tkEAL ESY tl 35487' 1 02 ^O 1 4036 ge. 2 0r 4 Judicial Sale Deed The Judicial Sales Corporation Sy: 6t Nanc R. Valiom Chief Ex ve Off State of IL, County of COOK ss, 1, Kristin M Smith, a Notary Public, in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Nancy R. Vallone, personally known to me to be the Chief Executive Officer of The Judicial Sales Corporation, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that as such Chief Executive Officer he /she signed and delivered the said Deed pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation, as his/her free and voluntary act, and as the free and voluntary act and Deed of said corporation, for the rases and purposes therein set forth. Given under my hand and seal on this 16th day of July, 2010 Notary�c - This Deed was prepared by August R. Butera, The Judicial Corporation, One South Wacker Drive, 24th Floor, Chicago, IL 60606.4650. Exempt under provision of Paragraph —�. Section 3 I -45 of the Real Estate Transfer Tax Law (35 ILCS 200/31- 45). l� 7 19 Date ur Representative Grantor's Name and Address: THE JUDICIAL SALES CORPORATION One South Wacker Drive, 24th Floor Chicago, Illinois 606 -4650 (312)236 -SALE Grantee's Name and Address and mail tax bills to: SA CHALLENGER, INC, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, by assignment 'IL LA, G "r OF l l I. P Judicial Safe Deed Contact Name and Address: Contact: S pr C. k l ll 4. )QC_ Address: � 1a, n J G Telephone: Mail To: MICHAEL J. GOLDSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 17 NORTH STATE STREET, SUITE 490 CHICAGO, IL,60602 (312) 346 -0945 Att. No. 20137 File No. �' ( OD) If` IC.21- :8 6 YageB -11: .. STATEMENT BY GRANTOR AND GRANTEE The grantor or his agent affirms that, to the best of his knowledge, the name of the grantee shown on the deed or assignment of beneficial interest in a land trust is either a natural person, an Illinois corporation or foreign corporation, authorized to do business or acquire and hold title to real estate in Illinois, a part ership authhorized to do business or acquire and hold title to real estate in Illinois, or other entity recognized as a person and authorized to do business or acquire title to real estate under the laws of the State of Illinois. THE JUDICIAL SALES CORPORATION Dated; July 19, 2010 y: Agent Subscribed and sworn to b 5 me e sal s o 4 t the Slk " lstola day of 201 %Pit `. sine ' 0 1% 5, �oi� owl Q%% Ex4ue� `sale► ARY The grantee or his agent affirms that, to the best of his knowledge, the name of the grantee shown on the deed or assignment of beneficial interest in a land trust is either a natural person, an Illinois corporation or foreign corporation, authorized to do business or acquire and hold title to real estate in Illinois, a partnership authorized to do business or acquire and hold title to real estate in Illinois, or other entity recognized as a person and authorized to do business or acquire title to real estate under the laws of the State of Illinois. SA CHALLENGER, INC Dated: July 19, 2010 Agent Subscribed and sworn to before m the said Agent this ��lay of '�1,1 E 2010 ARY a t N 2 N to o�at"4 Fssa �XPMeg an F�1 ViLLA'GEE 0c il� to PROSPECT NOTE: Any person who knowingly submits a false statement concerning the identity of a grantee shall be guilty of a Class C misdemeanor for the first Offense and of a Class A misdemeanor for subsequent offenses. (Attach to deed or ABI to be recorded in Cook County, Illinois, if exempt under the provisions of §4 of the Illinois Real Estate Transfer Tax Act.) Cook L.l1t.nt A ,asLire, „ t/ .. ....,,. Click _ w.w} 5 icon to send pageto •�;,va`� printer Office of Cools County Treasurer - Maria Pappas Coots County Property Tax A Payment Information Printed copies of this information may not be used as a tax bill. Payments roust be submitted with original tax bill. Property Index Number (PIN): 03.27. 307 -024 -0000 20 30 Tax `few - imormation y PaYabje in 2011 Tax Year: 2010 Tax Type: Current Tax Volume: 233 PCL: 5 -17 PCL: 5 -17 Property Location Property Location 950 ELMHURST RD WHEELING, iL 60090 -5507 Mailing Information WHEELING, IL 60090 -5507 1ST HOME MTG MANGLARDI 950 N ELMHURST RD MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 -1144 1ST HOME MTG MANGLARDI Exemption Information Exemptions do not become effective unfit the second installment. Tax Payment Information MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 -1144 Installment Tax Amount Billed Tax Due Date Last Payment Date Received Exemption Information Received 1st $85,466.62 04/01/2011 $85,466.62 03/16/11 Balance Due: Senior Citizen Exemption Received: NO The balance doe, includinq any penalty, is as of: 5/1112011 Payments processed arc posted through; 611012011 2009 Tax Year Information - Payable its 2010 Tax Year: 2009 Tax Type: Current Tax Volume: 233 PCL: 5 -17 Property Location 950 ELMHURST RD WHEELING, IL 60090 -5507 Mailing Information 1ST HOME MTG MANGLARDI 950 N ELMHURST RD MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 -1144 Exemption Information Homeowner Exemption Received: NO Senior Citizen Exemption Received: NO Senior Freeze Exemption Received: NO Tax Payment Information Installment Tax Amount Billed Tax Due Date Last Payment pate Received Received 1st $78,002.57 03/02/2010 $78,002,57 03!02 /10 2nd $77,391.28 12113/2010 $77,391.28 12106/10 Balance Due: �— $0.00 The balance due, including any panalty. is as of. 5/11/26f9 - Payments processed are posted iftrough: 5190, Printed copies of this information may not be used as a tax bill. Payments must be submitted with original tax bill. V 3 !._LAO:i _ C` t._ http: / /www. cookcountytreasurer. cornlpaymentprintout.aspx ?type =curr'ent &pin= 03273 0 70... 5/11/2011 Affidavit of Ownership COUNTY OF COOK ) } STATE OF ILLINiOIS } under oath, state that I am the sole an an authorized officer of the commonly described as i So \ i } owner of the property �fl CFf'y�I �I eL� and that such Property is owned by ! �A C S � 32 f\e 1 as of this date. �1 1 c ±r .0 / _ Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Gr . , 20 . -lu ov wa"o'L- Notary Public OFFICIAL. SEAL. JULIE ANN WARD Notary Public - State of Illinois My Commission Expires Fab 18, 2014 F vi L M1 PRCOI Mount Prospect Department of Corn inunity Development Phone 847,818.5328 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 www.mountprospect.org i I TDD 847.392.6064 FINAL Draft- 4/21111 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT by and between SA CHALLENGER, INC., as Seller, and CHICK FIL-A, INC., as Purchaser IMt. Prospect Fsuj R `- 0 p y VILLAGE OF IMF: PROSPECT 334211.4 13320991 v2 13328770v. I PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this " Agreement ") is made and entered into as of the day of April, 2011 (the " Effective Date ") by and between SA CHALLENGER, INC., a Minnesota corporation (" and CHICK- FIL-A, INC., a Georgia corporation (` Purchaser "). RECITALS A. Seller desires to sell and Purchaser desires to acquire the property described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions in this Agreement. B. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which are expressly acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser agree as follows: AGREEMENTS 1. Description of Prop= A&Vement to Bu and Sell. Subject to the terms and conditions in this Agreement, Purchaser agrees to buy from the Seller and Seller agrees to sell to the Purchaser the improved real property containing approximately 1.54 acres located at 950 N. Elmhurst Rd., Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, as described on Exhibit "A" (the " band "), together with any and all improvements, appurtenances, rights, privileges and easements benefiting, belonging or pertaining to the Land, and all right, title and interest of Seller in and to any land lying in the bed of any road in front of or adjoining the Land, together with any strips or gores relating to the Land (collectively, the "Pro a "). 2. Earnest Money and Title Company Within five (5) business days after the Effective Date, Purchaser will deliver to Chicago Title Insurance Company, Attn: Laura W. Kaltx, 200 Galleria Parkway S.E., Suite 2060 Atlanta, Georgia 30339, 404 - 419.3216 (ph), 770- 325 -2732 (fax) (the "`Tale C m an ') the sum of in an interest - bearing account as earnest money for the purposes of the Agreement (the " Earnest Money "). Seller, Purchaser and Title Company will execute the Earnest Money Escrow Agreement attached as Exhibit "B" simultaneous with the execution of this Agreement. 3. Turchase Price. The "Purchase rice" of the Property is and is subject to adjustments and prorations as provided in this Agreement. At Closing, the Purchase Price will be paid to Seller by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated by Seller. 4. Critical Dates Seller and Purchaser agree as follows: (a) The period commencing on the Effective Date of this Agreement and expiring at 7:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the day which is >] after the Effective Date is the " Inspection Period ". (b) Purchaser's obligations under this Agreement are contingent on the receipt of all private approvals required from third parties and all permits and other governmental authorizations deemed necessary or appropriate by Purchaser for the development and operation of the Land as a restaurant with a "drive -thru , pylon or monument sign and a children's play facility (collectively, including third party approvals, the " Permits "). Purchaser shall make its initial submittal for its Permits no later than the following the expiration of the inspection Period. Purchaser shall thereafter diligently pursue receipt of the same. Seller will cooperate with Purchaser, at no expense to 334211 -4 13320891v.2 13328770v.1 VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT Seller, in obtaining the Permits. The date Purchaser actually receives its Permits shall be referred to herein as the " Permit Date ". If the Permit Date has not occurred on or before th following the r (the "Desl n aad Submittal Period "), then Purchaser ma elect one of the following options (such a action to occur in writing prior to S:00 p.m. CST on the of the Design and Submittal Period): (i)�the Design and Submittal Period by NOW upon (A) written not and (S) the deposit of an additional sum in the amount of (ii) terminate this Agreement and or (iii) waive such requirement. If Purchaser elects to extend the Design and Submittal Period pursuant to option (i) hereof and is unable to secure its Permits prior to the expiration of such extension, then Purchaser may exercise its option under (ii) or (iii) above upon written notice to Seller delivered prior to the expiration of the extended Design and Submittal Period. The failure of Purchaser to make a timely election (in either instance) shall be deemed to be Purchaser's election of (iii). In the event Purchaser terminates in accordance with this Section 4(b), then the Earnest Money, shall promptly be returned to Purchaser and neither party shall have any further rights against the other. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (1)ak MmommWPurchaser provides Seller with a letter (or other writing) from the municipality or applicable third party stating that Purchaser has been unable to obtain one or more Permits deemed r asonably n by Purchaser, and (ii ) PurchW provided Seller with written progress reports no unng the Design and Submittal Period as may be dMended. then Purchaser shall be entrt tc (c) Seller represents and warrants that the property is currently occupied on a month - to -month basis by the following tenants pursuant to expired or otherwise unwritten (verbal) leases: I (together, the " Existing Tenants of the Design an ubmi�tal Period as may be extended, Seller shall give written notice to the Existing Tenants terminating their tenancies and requiring that they vacate the Property ereafter (the "Vacation Deadline "), a draft of such notice to be tendered to Purchaser's counsel rior to the delivery of such notice for reasonable approval. following the Effective Date hereof, Seller will submit estoppel certificates to the Existing Tenants requesting that they confirm the terms and condition , of their leasehold interests. Seller agrees to promptly provide Purchaser with a copy of any response 'thereto. (d) The " CIosine Date shall be the later of r (ii) the date theq �-,� The dates in this Section are subject to extension only as expressly set forth in this Agreement. 5. Terms and Conditions of Inspgotion Period Seller's Ibelivery of Due Diligence Items. Purchaser may enter the Land as needed upon reasonable prior notice to Seller to do what is reasonably necessary to investigate and plan for the use and development of the band; provided, however, that Purchaser shall not conduct any "Phase II" environmental tests or perform any intrusive tests upon or under the Property without the prior written consent of Seller (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed). Seller shall have the right to be present at all such inspections and set reasonable guidelines which the Purchaser shall follow so as to minimize any interference with or disruption to business being conducted on the Property by the Existing Tenants. Purchaser will restore any area of the Land disturbed by Purchaser to as near its original condition as reasonably possible. Purchaser agrees that it shall enter upon the Property at its own risk. Except for the negligent and willful 334211 -3 13320891vl 1332MO j �,.= P 1 3 F y LL.Ap, 09 � PO I L PRO \ l o i - 11 acts of Seller or its agents, contractors or employees, Purchaser will indemnify Seller against any claims or damages incurred by Seller as a result of persons or firms entering the Land on Purchaser's behalf to, Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 5, Seiler makes no representation or warrahty about the Site Information, including the content, completeness or accuracy thereof and hereby disclaims the same. b. AS-A, MIMR_E-IS. Purchaser and Seller acknowledge that Purchaser has done a preliminary inspection of the prior to executing this Agreement, and will do a more thorough inspection of the Property, the Site Information, if any, delivered by Seiler pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and any other information which Purchaser has deemed necessary in evaluating the Property during the Inspection Period. Notwithstauding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, except as expressly set forth herein to the contrary (a) Purchaser shall adqujre the Property "AS IS, WHERE IS ", with all faults, without'any obligation of Seller to'p*brm any repairs, improvements, maintenance or other work to the Property or any part thereof, and without, except as expressly set forth herein to the contrary, any representations or warranties, express or implied, of any kind from Seller, including, and explicitly disclaiming, warranties of fitness, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, habitability, tenantability or environmental condition, (b) Seller expressly disclaims any representations and % arranties with respect to the Property and/or the Site Information, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement; t -including any representations by any brokers, agents or salesmen; and (c) Purchoprgdoes hereby acknowledge that, in purchasing the Property, Purchaser is relying its own due diligence and investigations of the Property. This provision shall expressly survive the Closing. 7. [RESERVED) B. [RESERVED] 9_ Closing and Closing Date Subject to the conditions in this Agreement, the sate of the Property (the "Closin ) will be held at the office of the Title Company on the Closing Date. Seller and Purchaser agree to cooperate with one another to deliver documents in escrow to the Title Company in order to eliminate the need for representatives of Seller and Purchaser to attend the Closing. Seller will deliver to Purchaser full and exclusive possession of the Land on the date of Closing, subject only to the Permitted Exceptions (as defined in Section 11). 334211 -3 3 _ 13320891 v.2 13329770v_I VILLAGE O MiT. PROSPECT Purchaser's obligations under this Agreement are conditioned on Purchaser's determination that the Land is satisfactory for the use and development intended by Purchaser and that the development is Seller will deliver to Purchaser, true and complete copies of all due diligence matena s related to the Property in the possession or control of. y eller. The materials may iftde environmental and soils reports, prior inspection reports, prior title policies, title exceptions, surveys, and any existing or (to Seller's knowledge) pending exclusive or restrictive use provisions (co llectively, "Site Information'). If Seller _f Ells to deliver the Site Information in its possession or control Seller will execute and deliver to the Title Company (a) a (the " conveying fee simple title to the Property• subject only to the Permitted Exceptions, (b) a customary owner's affidavit in order to delete the so- called "standard exceptions" in an ALTA title policy (other than the "survey" exception; which will be Purchaser's responsibility) and to insure the "gap" between the effective date of the title commitment and the Closing Date, (c) an affidavit of Seller as required by Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (d) evidence of Seller's authority as reasonably required by the Title Company, (e) the information required for Purchaser to file IRS Form 1099 -S, (f) a quitclaim bill of sale conveying all improvements, furniture, fixtures -and equipment, and other personal property located on the Land and not owned by an Existing Tenant or other third party, and (g) any other documents deemed reasonably necessary by Purchaser, Seller, or the Title Company. 10. E enses and Proration at the CIosin . A tax escrow will be set up at the Closing for purposes of paying the 2010 and 2011 taxes and Seller will retain the right for all prior tax year refunds or other relief. Taxes for the Property will be prorated as of 11:59 p.m. on the day prior to Closing. The parties acknowledge that Illinois assesses taxes one year in arrears. Accordingly, the settlement statement will contain three deposits into the tax escrow - one by Seiler for the 2010 tax year (for which Seller will be responsible for 100% of such bill), one by Seller for Seller's pro -rata share of 2011 real estate taxes, and one by Purchaser for Purchaser's pro -rata share of 2011 taxes (both 2011 tax deposits will be based on IOOOA of the most recent tax bill available). The parties shall reprorate taxes after the issuance of the second installment 2011 tax bill (payable in 2012). The taxes will be paid by the Title Company when actually billed, and Seller and Purchaser agree to pay their share of any shortfall at the time of the reproration. Seller will pay the Seller's portion of transfer, grantor or documentary taxes due with the recording of the Deed and SeIler's attorney's fees and expenses. Purchaser will pay the recording fees with respect to the Deed, all title examination fees and premiums for the policy insuring Purchaser, Purchaser's portion of transfer, grantee or documentary taxes dae with the recording of the Deed, and Purchaser's attorney's fees and expenses. The obligations of Seiler and Purchaser in this Section 10 will survive the Closing. 11. Title Surve Existing Use Restrictions of Seller. Purchaser will order its own title commitment and surve all at Purchaser's sole cost and expense. Purchaser to examine title and survey to the Property and to advise Seller in writing of any title or survey objections (the " Obiectio us "). Purchaser may update the effective date of its title examination or survey at any time prior to the Closing and give notice to Seller of any Objections . appearing for the first time subsequent to the effective date of its previous title examination or survey, as the case may be. The encumbrances disclosed by Purchaser's title examination and/or survey and not objected to by Purchaser are referred to as the " Permitted Exceptions ". In addition, if Purchaser subsequently waives an objection in writing, that encumbrance will be included in the Permitted Exceptions. The deed from Seller to Purchaser will contain the legal description prepared from Seller's vesting deed_ if Seller's vesting deed has a different legal description for the Land than that shown on Purchaser's survey, Purchaser may obtain a legal equivalency endorsement or other similar endorsement to its title commitment to insure any discrepancies between the legal description from Seller's vesting deed and Purchaser's survey. Seller advise Purchaser in writing of the objections Seller agrees to cure. However, Seller agrees at Seller Will remove or cause to be insured 334211 -3 1332089]v.2 13326770v.1 IUN over all monetary encumbrances at or prior to Closing, and such monetary encumbrances shall not be deemed to be Objections. If Seiler fails to respond then Seller will be deemed to have declined to cure any of the non- monetary objections in Purchaser's notice. If Seller declines to cure any specific Objections, then Purchaser may elect either (i) to terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, in which event the Earnest Money will be immediately refunded to'Purchaser and all rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement will be of no further force or effect, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, or (ii) to accept title subject to the specific Objections. If Seller agrees in writing to cure an Objection but fails to do so at o (a) Purchaser may attempt to cure the Objection on Seller's behalf, in which event the Purchase Price will be reduced by the amount equal to the actual reasonable cost and expense incurred by Purchaser in curing the defect or objection, (b) Purchaser may accept title to the Property subject to the Objection, or (c) any combination of clauses (a) and (b). If Purchaser elects to attena t to cure any Objection pursuant to clause (a} Purchaser may extend the Closing for a period not to If Purchaser is not successful in curing the Objection, then Purchaser may exercise its options under either clause (b) or terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Seller and the Earnest Money will be immediately refunded to Purchaser and all rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement will be of no further force or effect, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement If required by the Title Company, at Closing, Seller agrees to execute an indemnity agreement in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Title Company that will be sufficient to allow the 'Title Company to delete any exception for mechanic's lipns.find materialmen's liens arising by, through or under Seller and to insure the "gap" between the effecfl a date of the title commitment and the Closing Date. Seller covenants and agrees that Seller will not (i) change or alter the physical condition of the Land, (ii) grant, create, consent to, or modify any encumbrance affecting the Land, (iii) unless expressly provided in this Agreement, pursue or consent to any rezoning of the Land, or (iv) market the Land for sale to any other party. 12. Representations and Warranties of Seller Seller warrants and represents to Purchaser as follows: (a) Seller owns fee simple title to the Property free and clear of all liens, special assessments, easements, encroachments, reservations, restrictions and encumbrances, excepting only those items set forth on Schedule 12 (a) attached hereto and made a part hereof, monetary encumbrances to be removed by Seller at or prior to Closing, real property ad valorem taxes not yet due and payable and recorded easements or encumbrances affecting the Property, the Permitted Exceptions and the Existing Tenants. (b) To Seller's knowledge, within the eller has received no written notice of any actions, suits or proceedings of any kind pending or threatened against Seller or the Land in any court or before or by any federal, state, county or municipal department, commission, board, bureau or agency or other governmental instrumentality. (c) All actions required to authorize the execution and performance of this Agreement by Seller have been taken, and this Agreement constitutes a valid and binding agreement, enforceable against Seller. (d) Intentionally Omitted. (e) Intentionally Omitted. 334211 -3 5 t3320891v2 i ' =[Z 1332877pv_E �� __! 3 (f) intentionally Omitted. (g) Intentionally Omitted. (h) To Seller's knowledge, Seller has received no written notice of any unrecorded restrictive covenants. Seller will take, or cause to be taken, reasonable actions necessary to cause its warranties and representations to remain true and correct, in all material respects, through the date of the Closing- In the event that any of the representations and warranties become materially untrue (i) if the change is due to the fault of Seller, the event will constitute a default by Seller and Purchaser will have the remedies in Section 13, and (ii) if the change is not due to the fault of Seller, Purchaser may either waive such condition, in writing, or terminate this Agreement and receive a refund of the Earnest Money, in which event neither Seller nor Purchaser will have any further obligations under this Agreement. All of the representations and warranties will be reaffirmed by Seller as true and correct as of the date of the Closing and will survive the Closing for 13. Defaults If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then, upon written notice to Seller, if such default or failure is not cured t (or such longer period as is necessary to effect such cure so long as Seller is diligently prosecuting such cure), Purchaser may pursue any and all rights and remedies available'to Purchaser at law or in equity including, without limitation, specific performance. However, in the event specific performance is unavailable (for example, if Seller were to sell the Property to a third party in contravention of this Agreement), then Purchaser may terminate this Agreement and receive an immediate refund of all Earnest Money plus reimbursement of Purchaser's actual out-of ket expenses incurred in connection with this transaction (up to a maximum reimbursement oa upon reasonably satisfactory evidence of such payment). If Purchaser defaults under this Agreement then Seller's sole and exclusive remedy for the default will be to terminate this Agreement and to receive and retain the Earnest Money as full liquidated damages for Purchaser's default. ' Seller and Purchaser acknowledge that it is impossible to more precisely estimate the damages to be suffered by Seller and that retention of the Earnest Money is not intended to be a penalty. Updn the termination, except as expressly provided in this Agreement to the contrary, all rights and obligations created under this Agreement will terminate and be of no further force or effect. The provisions of this Section 13 will not limit Purchaser's obligations under any indemnity set forth in this Agreement. In the event either Seller or Purchaser enforces the obligations of the other under this Agreement by instituting legal proceedings, then the non - prevailing party in any such proceedings will pay all out -of- pocket expenses actually incurred by the prevailing party, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. 14. Condemnation If all or any material portion of the Land or any material portion of any land on which off -site access, parking, utility service or stormwater detention is located (and which is required for the use and development of the Land) is taken or condemned by any entity with the power of eminent domain prior to the date of the Closing, or in the event Purchaser receives notice of a proposed taking prior to the date of the Closing, then Purchaser will have the option of either (i) terminating this Agreement by giving written notice to Seller, in which event all Earnest Money will be immediately refunded to Purchaser and this Agreement and all rights and obligations created under this Agreement will be of no further force or effect, except as expressly provided to the contrary, or (ii) requiring Seller to convey the remaining portion of the Land to Purchaser pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement and to transfer and assign to Purchaser at the Closing all of Seller's right, title and interest in 33421 1 -3 6 13320991v.2 13328770v.1 and to any award made or to be made for the Land. Seller and Purchaser agree that Purchaser will have the right to participate in all negotiations relating to the Land or to the compensation to be paid for any portion or portions of the Land to be condemned if clause (ii) is selected. I5. ro ers. Purchaser and Seller acknowledge that (the ` Broke n has acted as the broker for Purchaser in connection with the sale of the Property. At the Closing, and only in the event of the Closin of the Purchase Price. in the event this transaction is not consummated for any reason, then no commission is earned and none is payable. Seller will indemnify Purchaser against any claim for any real estate sales commission, finder's fees, or like compensation in connection with this transaction and arising out of any act or agreement of Seller. Likewise, Purchaser will indemnify Seller against any claim for any real estate sales commission, finder's fees or like compensation in connection with this transaction and arising out of any act or agreement of Purchaser. Seller's indemnity and Purchaser's indemnity will survive the Closing or any termination of this Agreement. 16. Notices Notices given pursuant to this Agreement will be effective only if in writing and delivered (i) in person, (ii) by courier, (iii) by reputable overnight courier guaranteeing neat business day delivery, (iv) if sent on a business day during the business hours of 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., central time, via facsimile, with a copy to follow by reputable overnight courier guaranteeing next business day delivery, or (v) by United States certified snail, return receipt requested. All notices will be directed to the other party at its address provided below or such other address as either party may designate by notice given in accordance with this Section 16. Notices will be effective (i) in the case of personal delivery or courier delivery, on the date of delivery, (ii) if by overnight courier, one (1) business day after deposit with all delivery charges prepaid, (iii) if by facsimile, on the date of transmission, provided that a confirmation sheet is received and a second copy is sent as required above, and (iv) in the case of certified mail, the earlier of the date receipt is acknowledged on the return receipt for such notice or five (5) business days after the date of posting by the United States Post Office. The notice addresses for Seller and Purchaser are as follows: if to Seller: SA Challenger, Inc. Ann: Dan Lawlor 28 W. Madison Oak Park, IL 60302 Mail Code MK- IL -CMOP PHONE: 708- 358 -2283 FAX: 708 - 386 -0273 With a copy to Seller's counsel: Deutsch, Levy & Engel, Chartered Attn: Aaron B. Zarkowsky 225 W. Washington St., Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois 60606 PHONE: 312- 853 -8435 FAX: 312- 853 -8475 334211 -3 13320891v"2 13328770v.1 it n S" 'F 'f 9 F NO Purchaser: Chick- fil -A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349 PHONE: (404) 765 -5000 FAX: (404) 684 -8620 , AT N: Property Management — Real Estate Legal With a copy to: Chick El -A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349 PHONE: (404) 765 -8000 FAX: (404) 765 -8941 AT rN: Real Estate Legal Department — F'SU Division With a copy to Purchaser's counsel: Seyfartll Shaw LLP Attn: Kevin A. Woolf 1075 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 2500 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 404 - 885 -6733 (v) 1 404 -724 -1733 (f) 17. General Provisions. No failure of either patty to exercise any right given in this Agreement or to insist upon strict compliance with any obligation in this Agreement, and no custom or Practice at variance with the terms of this Agreement, will constitute a waiver of either party's right to demand exact compliance with this Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties to this Agreement, and no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, oral or Otherwise, between the parties not embodied in this Agreement will be of any force or effect Any amendment to this Agreement will be binding on Seller and Purchaser only if the amendment is in writing and executed by both Seller and Purchaser. The provisions of this Agreement will be for the benefit of and be binding upon Seller and Purchaser and their respective heirs, administrators, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns. At the election of Purchaser, this transaction will be closed in the name of and the deed delivered to its nominee or assigns; provided, however that the Purchaser shall not be relieved of any obligations contained herein. Time is of the essence of this Agreement This Agreement and all amendments will be governed by and construed under the laws of the state in which the Land is located. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, but all of which taken together will constitute one and thes ame agreement. All personal pronouns used in this Agreement, whether used in the masculine, feminine or neuter gender, will include all genders, the singular will include the plural and vice versa. The headings inserted at the beginning of each section are for convenience only, and do not add to or subtract from the meaning of the contents of each section. All exhibits attached to this Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Agreement 18. Da for Performance, Wherever there is a day or time period established for performance and the day or the expiration of such time period is a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, then the time for performance will be automatically extended to the next business day. 19. Survival of Provisions Closing. . The provisions of this Agreement so identified shall survive the 20. Severabili . This Agreement is intended to be performed in accordance with, and only to the extent permitted by, all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. If any provision of this Agreement is for any reason and to any extent determined to be invalid or unenforceable, then the 334211 -3 I3320891v2 13328770v.1 VP remainder of this Agreement and the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances will not be affected but rather will be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law. 21. Effective Date The "Effective Date" to be inserted on the first page of this Agreement is the date upon which this Agreement has been fishy executed by Seller and Purchaser and each of Seller and Purchaser has received a fully executed original counterpart. If Seller does not return this Agreement �rsigned by Seller, at Purchaser's option, Purchaser's counterparts ma be withdrawn by written notice to Seller. This Agreement has first been executed by Purchaser. after receipt, Seller will deliver a fully executed original counterpart to Purchaser by overnight delivery for receipt on the next succeeding business day and Seller will insert the next succeeding business day on the first page of all original counterparts of this Agreement. 22, Seller's Knowledge For purposes of this Agreement and any document delivered at Closing, the phrase "to Seller's knowledge" is deemed to refer to facts within the actual, personal knowledge of Seller's Representatives only, and no others, only at the times indicated, and without investigation or inquiry, or obligation to make investigation or inquiry, and in no event shall the same include any knowledge imputed to Seller by any other person or entity. "Seller's Representatives" means and shall be limited to the following: Dan Lawlor. (SIGNATURES COMMENCE ONF'OLL0WING PAGE) -P { rte - .;,,.. u: J 's f31. �`it.,3� 1 s <. 334211 -3 13320891x.2 1332977ov.1 [Purchaser signature page to Purchase and Sale Agreement - Mt. Prospect FSUJ Purchaser has executed this Agreement under seal as of April Z',I 201 "PURCHASER" CHICK INC., a Georgia corporation L.y . �i�1T�l� .- ' � M710'ArA OR 4 (CORPORATE SEAL) Federal Tax Identification Number of Purchaser. LF L L; 334211-4 13320991v.2 13328770V.1 [Seller signature page to Purchase and Sale Agreement - Mt. Prospect FSU] IN ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, Seller has executed this Agreement tender seal as of April Wk 2411. 6&334W SA CHALLENGER, INC., a Minnesota corporation EY= kn'n�j z Name• Title. 01, {CORPORATE SEAL} Federal Tax I ti ]cation Number of Seller: a 334211-4 13326891x2 13329770v.t SCHEDULE OF SCHEDULES EXHIBITS SCHEDULE 12(a) LIENS, EASEMENTS, ENCROACHMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND ENCUMBRANCES EXMIT DESCRIPTION OF LAND EXHIBIT EARNEST MONEY ESCROW AGREEMENT F �73 13271527Y.2 13320891v.2 13328770v-3 SCHEDULE 12 fa LIENS, EASEMENTS, ENCROACH MEENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND ENCUMBRANCES EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF RAND - ELMHURST SUBDIVISION, RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1968 AS DOCUMENT 20707569. (AFFECTS THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY 10' X 20' STRIP OF LAND) EASEMENT IN, UPON, UNDER AND ALONG THE STRIPS ANDIOR PARCELS OF LAND LABELLED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AND INDICATED BY BROKEN LINES AND SHADING ON THE PLAT ATTACHED THERETO AND MARKED EXHIBIT W, THE RIGHT, PERMISSION AND AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT, LAY, OPERATE, MAINTAIN, RELOCATE, RENEW AND REMOVE EQUIP CONSISTING OF UNDERGROUND WIRES AND UNDERGROUND CONDUITS, CABLES, ABOVE GROUND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURES AND OTHER NECESSARY ELECTRICAL FACILITIES AND TO TRANSMIT AND DISTRIBUTE BY MEANS OF SAID EQUIP, ELICTRICITY; WITH THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SAME FOR THE MAINTENANCE THEREOF; ALSO TO TRIM OR REMOVE FROM TIME TO TIME SUCH TREES, BUSHES AND SAPLINGS AS MAY BE REASONABLY REQUIRED; AND THAT SAID EASEMENT PASSES UNDER THE BUILDING LOCATED ON SAID LAND AND THAT ANY FUTURE MAINTAINANCE WILL NOT DISTURB SAID BUILDING IN ANY WAY; AS CREATED BY GRANT TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, RECORDED FEBRUARY 24,1967 AS DOCUMENT 20071070 AND AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF RAND- ELMHURST SUBDIVISION, RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1968 AS DOCUMENT 20707569. (AFFECTS A 5 FOOT STRIP OF LAND RUNNING NORTH TO SOUTH APPROXIMATELY THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE LAND) EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LAND SOUTH AND ADJOINING AS CREATED BY DEED FROM D. G. FRANZEN, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 28,1980 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 580 TO R. A. FRANZEN, ALSO KNOWN AS ROLAND A. FRANZEN DATED JUNE 9,1981 AND RECORDED JULY 22, 1981 AS DOCUMENT 25945073 OVER THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 DESRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE WEST 25 FEET OF THE EAST 45 FEET (EXCEPT THE NORTHERLY 20 FEET THEREOF), MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 1, AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY 25 FEET OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 45 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1, OF THE EAST 20 FEET OF LOT 1- UNRECORDED GRANT OF EASEMENT A$ DISCLOSED BY PLAT OF SURVEY FROM F: C. BR €HM AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 580 TO THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY OF THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT, LAY, OPERATE, MAINTAIN, RELOCATE, RENEW AND REMOVE NECESSARY ELECTRIC FACILITIES AND TO HAVE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO LAND TO MAINTAIN SAID ELECTRIC FACILITIES OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND: THAT PART OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE SAID EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 27, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING 198.97 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 27; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SAID CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD, 439.93 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE SAID EAST LINE WITH THE CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD, FOR A DISTANCE OF 170.23 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE; OF 138.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 50.89 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 13271527v.2 1332099tv2 �' 1! I { ry 13328770v,1 f{ 249.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFORESAID EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 27; THENCE NORTHWARD ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, A DISTANCE OF 136.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF 'WEDGEWOOD TERRACE' A SUBDIVISION RECORDED MARCH 4,1946 AS DOCUMENT 13732148, A DISTANCE OF 604.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD; THENCE SOUTHEASTWARD ALONG THE SAID CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD, BEING A CURVED LINE CONVEXED TO THE SOUTHWEST, OF 15,626.1 FEET IN RADIUS, FOR AN ARC LENTGH OF 68.20 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTWARD ALONG THE SAID CENTER LINEOF RAND ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 123.28. FEET TO A POINT BEING 589.74 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 27, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY A DISTANCE OF 228.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THEREOF HERETOFORE DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAYS), IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. (AFFECTS PARCEL 1) 30 FOOT BUILDING LINE ALONG THE EAST AND SOUTHWESTERLY LINES OF THE LAND AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF SUBDMSION RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1969 AS DOCUMENT 20707569. (AFFECTS PARCEL 1) EASEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY PURPOSES, INGRESS, EGRESS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SET FORTH IN THE DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 19358929 AS AMENDED BY AMENDMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1982 AS DOCUMENT 26382436. (AFFECTS PARCEL 1) ENCROACHMENT OF THE ONE STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED MAINLY ON THE LAND ONTO THE EASEMENT SHOWN HEREIN AT EXCEPTION REFERENCE LETTER(S) S AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF SURVEY NUMBER 080825 PREPARED BY JAMES M. ELLMAN, LTD. DATED AUGUST 26, 2008. 25 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AS DEPICTED ON SURVEY NUMBER 080826 PREPARED BY JAMES M. ELLMAN LTD DATED AUGUST 25, 2008. PARTY WALL RIGHTS OF THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY SOUTHEASTERLY AND ADJOINING, AS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY MADE BY JAMES M. ELLMAN, LTD. DATED AUGUST 25, 2008, AND ANY AND ALL POSSIBLE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS RELATING THERETO. Parcel 2 is referred as: EASEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY PURPOSES, INGRESS AND EGRESS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 AFORESAID, AS CREATED BY THE DEED FROM F.C. BREHM, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 1, 1968 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 580 TO THE FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF OHIO, DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1964 AND RECORDED JANUARY 18, 1965 AS DOCUMENT NO. 19358929 AND AS AMENDED BY AMENDMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1982 AS DOCUMENT 26382438. 334211 -2 13324891v.2 l3328770v.1 I HL 11f1 ; 1� �'•s_' �f_ Y k F 06 U T EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF L,4ND PARCEL 1: LOT 1 € N RAND— EL.MFIt URST SUBDI VI St ON, BEI NG A SU13DI VI SIGN OF PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE TIHI RD PRI NCI PAL IERI DIM, I N THE VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 'IS, 1968 AS DMMENT 20707569, IN COOK COUNTY, i LLI NDI S. PARCEL 2: EASEMW FOR DRIVEWAY PURPOSES, INGRESS AND EGRESS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 AFORESAID, AS CREATED BY THE DEED FROM F.C. BRIEHM, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 1, 1968 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 580 TO THE FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF OHIO, DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1964 AND RECORDED JANUARY 18, 1965 AS DOCUMENT HO. 19358929 AND AS AMENDED BY AMENDMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMOT AGREENIENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 4982 AS DOCUMENT 26382438. 1327 f 527x.2 13320891x.2 13328770Y.1 s` < � j f f��. � 7 i ;.�;�7 OF EXHIBIT BI"B" F- 4 A LE MGNE Y ESCR O W, 4 G R E E MEN T THIS EARNEST MONEY ESCROW AGREEMENT (this " Agreement ') is made and entered into this day of April, 2011, by and among CHICK_FIL -A, INC., a Georgia corporation, (" SA CHALLENGER, INC., a Minnesota corporation (" and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ( " Title Comnanv A. Seller and Purchaser entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement (the " Contract ') executed as of even date herewith for certain property located at 950 N. Elmhurst Rd., Mt. Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, as described in Exhibit "A" to the Contract (the "Pro a "). B. Purchaser and Seller desire that Title Company hold the Earnest Money in escrow as defined in and required under the Contract and this Agreement, subject to the Conditions of Escrow, attached to this Agreement. C. In consideration of the promises and undertakings in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties covenant'and agree as follows: agent. I. Purchaser and Seller hereby appoint Chicago Title Insurance Company as escrow 2. Purchaser will deliver and deposit with Title Company the amount of1♦� representing the Earnest Money as required by the Contract. Title Company will confirm, by written notice to Seiler and Purchaser, ieceipt of the Earnest Money. 'Title Company agrees to deposit the funds in a money market, interest- bearing account and to hold and disburse the funds as provided in this Agreement. Any additional earnest money required by the Contract will likewise be deposited if and when due with Title Company and will be a part of the "Earnest Money" in this Agreement. Purchaser's Federal Taxpayer Identification Number is: � All interest will accrue to and be reported to the Internal Revenue Service for the account of Purchaser. 3. Upon written notification from Purchaser and Seller that the sale will be consummated on a date certain, Title Company will deliver the Earnest Money to the closing to be applied to the purchase price. 4. Upon written notification from Purchaser and Seller that the sale will not take place, Title Company will deliver the Earnest Money in accordance with the release disbursement instructions also included in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event Purchaser terminates the Contract during the Inspection Period (as defined in the Contract) in accordance with the terms of the Contract, Purchaser will provide a copy of the termination to Title Company, and Title Company will immediately deliver the Earnest Money to Purchaser without requiring approval or authorization from Seiler. 5. The parties covenant and agree that in performing any of its duties under this Agreement, Title Company will not be liable for any Ioss, costs or damage which it may incur in the capacity. of Title Company, except for any loss, costs or damage arising out of its own default or gross negligence or willful misconduct. Accordingly, Title Company will not incur any liability with respect to (i) any action 334211-2 13320891 v.2 13328770v.1 VILL ACIIE Oi M1 PROSPECT taken or omitted to be taken in good faith upon advice of counsel for the parties given with respect to any questions relating to duties and responsibilities, or (ii) any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon any documents, including but not limited to, any written notice of instruction provided for in this Agreement or in the Contract, not only as to its execution and the validity and effectiveness of its provisions, but also to the truth and accuracy of any information contained in the same, which Title Company in good faith believes to be genuine, to be signed or presented by a proper person or persons and to conform with the provisions of this Agreement. 6. The parties covenant and agree that, in an event of a dispute under this Agreement, the Title Company may, in the Title Company's discretion, tender into the registry or custody of any court of competent jurisdiction sitting in the state where the Property is located, all money held under the terms of this Agreement, together with such legal pleading as is appropriate and will be discharged of its duties under this Agreement. 'Title Company will be reimbursed for any and all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees in connection with any such action. 7. Notices will be given in accordance with Section 16 of the Contract. The address for Title Company is: Chicago Title Insurance Company Attn: Laura W. Kaltz 200 Galleria Parkway S.E., Suite 2060 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 404 -419 -3216 (ph) H 770- 325 -2732 (fax) (SIGNATURES QOMV ffNCE ONFOLLOWNG PAGEJ OFF 5 Igo pLUl 334211 -2 13320891 v.2 33328770vJ The undersigned have caused this Agreement to be duly executed under seal as of day and year first above written. PURCHASER: CHICK -M-A, INC., a Georgia corporation By: Name: Title: Name: Title: (CORPORATE SEAL) (See following page for Title Company's si gna t ure ) .1 u 13271527x.2 13320891v.2 1332a770v. I The undersigned have caused this Agreement to be duly executed under seal as of day and year first above written. TITLE COMPANY: Chicago Title Usurance Company By: Name: Title: (CORPORATE SEAL) (See following page for Seller's signature) LA C`I° 334211 -2 1332OB91 V2 13328774x.1 The undersigned have caused this Agreement to be duly executed under seat as of day and year first above written. SELLER: SA Challenger, Inc., a Minnesota corporation By: Name: Title: (CORPORATE SEAL) F1 ; f? O PROSPECT "L 5 13271527x.2 1332089iv.2 13328770x.1 CONDI IONS OF ESCROW Title Company accepts this undertaking subject to these Conditions of Escrow: 1. The Earnest Money may be processed for collection in the normal course of business by Title Company, who may commingle funds received by it with escrow funds of others in its regular escrow account at a nationally recognized bank (the " Denos':torv "). Title Company will not be accountable for any incidental benefit which may be attributable to the funds so deposited. 2. Title Company will not be liable for any loss caused by the failure, suspension, bankruptcy or dissolution of the Depository; 3. Title Company will not be liable for loss or damage resulting from: a. any good faith act or forbearance of Title Company; b. any default, error, action or omission of any party, other than the Title Company; C, any defect in the title to any property unless such loss is covered under a policy of title insurance issued by the Title Company; d. the expiration of any time limit or other delay which is not solely caused by the failure of Title Company to proceed in its ordinary course of business, and in no event where such time limit is not disclosed in writing to the Title Company; e. the lack of authenticity of any writing delivered to Title Company or of any signature, or the lack of authority of the signatory to sign the writing; f. Title Company's compliance with all attachments, writs, orders, judgments, or other legal process issued out of any court; g. Title Company's assertion or failure to assert any cause of action or defense in any judicial or administrative proceeding; and h. Any loss or damage which arises after the Earnest Money has been disbursed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 4, Title Company will be fully indemnified by the parties for all its expenses, costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with any interpleader action which Title Company may file, in its sole discretion, to resolve any dispute as to the Earnest Money; or which may be filed against the Title Company. Such costs, expenses or attorney's fees, as well as the fees of Title Company described below, may be deducted from the Earnest Money. If Title Company is made a party to any judicial, non judicial or administrative action, hearing or process based on acts of any of the other parties and not on the malfeasance and/or negligence of Title Company in performing its duties, the expenses, costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by Title Company in responding to such action, hearing or process may be deducted from the funds held and the party /parties whose alleged acts are a basis for such proceedings will indemnify and hold Title Company harmless from said expenses, costs and fees incurred. 13271527x.2 13320891v.2 13328770x.1 f11 a �1t;E 0 F 6. Title Company's fee for acting escrow agent is shown on its Escrow Services and Charges which is available upon request. These fees, which may be paid in advance or will be deducted from the account upon disbursement, are the joint and several obligation of each party to any agreement, sales contract or other writing forming the basis for this escrow undertaking. 7. All controversies, issues, interpretation and other matters relating in any way to these Conditions of Escrow will be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of IIlinois. 8. In the event of any conflict between the terms any provisions of these Conditions of Escrow and the terms and provisions of the Agreement or other document to which this is attached, the terms and provisions of these Conditions of Escrow will prevail. 9. Title Company will be fully indemnified by the other parties and such parties will hold Title Company harmless from all damages, costs, claiins and expenses arising from Title Company's performance of its duties under this Agreement, including reasonable attorneys fees, except for those damages, costs, claims and expenses resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Title Company. VU 334211 -2 ;OT 1332U841v.2 9. 1332a770v.1 A - Modular size brick #1 - Red Velour by Cunningham Brick B - Modular size brick #2 - Tan by Cunningham Brick C - Prefinished metal roof - Color: Cardinal Red D - Prefinished metal coping to match metal roof E - Prefinished metal canopy to match metal roof F - Aluminum storefront EAST ELEVATION Mount Prospect, IL - #2845 April 27, 2011 Chipman i A - Modular size brick #1 - Red Velour by Cunningham Brick B - Modular size brick #2 - Tan by Cunningham Brick C - Prefinished metal roof - Color: Cardinal Red D - Prefinished metal coping to match metal roof E - Prefinished metal canopy to match metal roof F - Aluminum storefront NORTH ELEVATION Mount Prospect, IL - #2845 April 27, 2011 Chipman NORTHEAST PERSPECTIVE Mount Prospect, IL - #2845 April 27, 2011 Chipman i,: NORTHWEST PERSPECTIVE Mount Prospect, IL - #2845 April 27, 2011 Chipman G B A R �I A - Modular size brick #1 - Red Velour by Cunningham Brick B - Modular size brick #2 - Tan by Cunningham Brick C - Prefinished metal roof - Color: Cardinal Red D - Prefinished metal coping to match metal roof E - Prefinished metal canopy to match metal roof F - Aluminum storefront SOUTH ELEVATION Mount Prospect, IL - #2845 April 27, 2011 0 L !VP e 'qw lu G Chipman— SOUTHEAST PERSPECTIVE Mount Prospect, IL - #2845 April 27, 2011 JON °' Chipman: SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVE Mount Prospect, IL - #2845 April 27, 2011 " Chipman A - Modular size brick #1 - Red Velour by Cunningham Brick B - Modular size brick #2 - Tan by Cunningham Brick C - Prefinished metal roof - Color: Cardinal Red D - Prefinished metal coping to match metal roof E - Prefinished metal canopy to match metal roof F - Aluminum storefront WEST ELEVATION Mount Prospect, IL - #2845 April 27, 2011 c r Chipman >I wIllulyll motiffin Al MAIN IDENTIFICATION SIGN 75.00 60.00 A2 MAIN IDENTIFICATION SIGN 75.00 60.00 B WALL SIGN (SCRIPT) 104.40 33.68 d\ C WALL SIGN (SCRIPT) 282.00 25.26 I D I WALL SIGN (SCRIPT) 282.00 25.26 E WALL SIGN (SCRIPT) 95.30 10.25 s F WALL SIGN TAG LINE ( ) 282.00 36.75 G DIRECTIONAL (ENTER) 10.00 6.00 a ,.�"✓ a 81 r 1 H1 DRIVE -THRU MENU CANOPY. K K K e ' TO H2 DRIVE -THRU MENU CANOPY r e it o . • °r . {I I DRIVE -THRU MENU BOARD J (NOT USED) / C B a 5FT SET BACK K DOT - HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGNS Ste Q I L (NOT USED) / \ ITT ;I � I 'I M DOT - STOP SIGN ® ® i i II N DOT - STOP SIGN / DO NOT ENTER SIGN 0 FLAG POLE 4 \ I a Y / P CLEARANCE BAR 0 1 5FT SET BACK e ® AGGREGATE TOTAL; f r 1'A5 5198 North Lake Drive ALL ELECTRICAL DRAWN BY OEM HOLLIDAY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS THIS BRAGtctG5u0 (REAIfDBYQAn011 L Lake CIt,GA 30260 SITE PLAN SIGNS ARE 120 VOLTS p((OUNi REP BEN WJUIOAY SIGHS, I'x II1540T 10 BE RFPRODU(fO, CHANGE D. OR EZHIBIIEDl0tilr0Uf Cit , 2845 CHICK -FIL -A OUTSIDE DF IOOR( Hrwna( 01? NI PART VIDHOGraRJjBI 404 361 -361 -3800 fox 404- 361 -7038 a Eacu >sonFRa::rnfannEROraanonslGas IA( raysu(nurmUs UNLESS D RAWING APRntazon 9SON.EUWHURSiROAD we- www.(Iaytonsigns.com OTHERWISE INDICATED +! BS SUBIEn1OIEGALaDIO TSR EaURIOVIa :I r DRAWING FILE (FA dIOW:I PROSPFCL 4 SIGBAGE (DR REVISION DATE fAOUMi PROSPECT, L 60056 ©2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 43'-4" 10_5" _ i 33.68S FEET -- — -- �— MUMUrmpaulTamum -- -- - -- i 24'-1 "x 43'-4 1,044 SQ. FT. x 10% 7 104.4 30. FT. FRONT PLAYGRO ELEVATION SCALE - 1/8" = 1'- 0" REAR ELEVATION 43'-4" _ 10.25 SQUARE FEET i �tlunrNrrr um r p m p 22' -0" x 43'- 4" N 953 SQ. FT. x 10% mm " o o= 95.3 SO. FT SCALE - 1/8" = 1'- 0" Aof 5198 North Lake Drive Lak e City, GA 30260 404.361 -3800 fox404- 361.7038 wehsite - www.cloytonsigns.com 117'- 6" g _0 25.26 SQUARE FEET 36.75 SQUARE FEET 24' -0" x 117'- 6" „ 2,820 SQ. FT. x 10% 282 5 . FT. HE 6RIGINAL CHICKEN NM I . . i t ENTRY SIDE ELEVATION SCALE -1 /8" = 1'- 0" 117'- 6" 1 25.26 SQUARE FEET 24' -0" x 117'- 6" 2,820 x 10% F � 282 2 S Q. . FT. mm `1{ A A ID1QmRllmmm' JE!l DRIVE -THRU SIDE ELEVATION SCALE -1/8" = 1'- 0" 5198 North Lake Drive 1 ALL ELECTRICAL BEII HOLLIOAY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS THES DRAWING Isa1l ot&flAL ulVuBUSHEDOEsrtN(REAI(D B (unor E ( Lake Cit GA 30260 BUILDING ELEVATIONS SIGNS ARE 120 VOLTS rAMUNTREP BENHOWIDAY //� -- CHICK FIL A GIGNS,IH(It ISINOTTO BE REPRODUCED.(H4NGE0, 03 EXHIBITED 70+ ;.,0'Q OUTSIDE Of a00P(OMPAUf IUD41E OR NI PARIVITHOUT YIRIDEI 1 404- 361 -3800 fox 404 -361 -1038 wehsite - www.(Iaylonsigns.com R UNLESS 2 , APRIL 141011 845 950 N.EIMHURSTROAD PERMISSiONf0 !THE)tsfcROFCLAYTONSIG urt :DISU(asrnons lrE PA i3ESUBUOTONGALeg10NIIA COURTOf(A:I 1 DRAWING FILE (FA ABOUHTPROSPEQIL SIGNAGECOR OTHERWISE INDICATED TE PAOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 ©2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPECIFICATIONS CABINET ALUMINUM CABINET HAS STEEL FRAME WITH .080 ALUMINUM CLADDING, RETAINERS AND FILLER. CHICK -FIL -A ICON ACRYLIC FACES DECORATED WITH TRANSLUCENT VINYL FILM ON SURFACE OF ACRYLIC. FACES ARE BACKLIT BY HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS SPACED EVENLY ON 12" CENTERS. DECORATIVE SKIRT SKIRT HAS STEEL FRAME WITH .080 ALUMINUM CLADDING. READER BOARD ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION CABINET WITH ACRYLIC FACES BACKLIT BY HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS SPACED EVENLY ON 12" CENTERS, TRACK ACCOMMODATES WAGNER ZIP LETTERS, This Product is Listed by UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES. INC. UL and Bears the Mark: ALUMINUM SURFACES GRIPGARD #503 RED GLOSS FLEX FACES 230 -53 CARDINAL RED TRANSLUCENT VINYL FILM ACRYLIC FACES 7328 WHITE ACRYLIC ALUMINUM SURFACES WHITE NOTE: ICON SIDE OF SIGN SHOULD ALWAYS BE POSITIONED CLOSEST TO THE ROAD 11' -6 " 6'-8 ED. 60.00 SQUARE FEET MASONRY WORK AND CONCRETE PAD FOR MASONRY WORK IS FURNISHED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SIGN FOUNDATION IS FURNISHED BY CLAYTON SIGNS, INC. 10' 0 " 1, TOP OF SIGN 5'_O " TOP OF BASE 5198 North Lake Drive B f DOUBLE -FACED INTERNALLY- ILLUMINATEDMONUMENTSIGN Lake City, GA 30260 ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE DRAWN BY BEN NORIDAY ACCOUNiREP BEtINOLLIDAf STORE NUMBER STORfADDRESS TxnORAwni61Sen0Rl61' a !ullPUausxfOD[slGn(R[AEDarnsnon s16NS. IrrtfilsU@ LTatREPR00uciD .(NAGEO,Do Cube nmr09nD9f LOCATION AGGREGATE SQUARE FOOTAGE - 60.OD SQUARE FEET 120VOLTS (HI(K - FIT - A DUTSIDfOf (OUR ( OrAPANY Ill WHOLE ORINPAP .I1;91XOWT' %Rmf1 �� 404.3fi1- 3800 fox 404- 361.7038 websile- www.claytonsigns.com UNLESS DRAWING DATE APRN2420n 2845 950 N.ELMHURSTROAD PERdRSSIDnER0E, t1xE01YN (RDF(TaviWSNAR.udun'6U(xACTO�R lifBESUBiEOTOIMMnommea (DURTOF(A1 �� I OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION DATE 6'-8 ED. 60.00 SQUARE FEET MASONRY WORK AND CONCRETE PAD FOR MASONRY WORK IS FURNISHED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SIGN FOUNDATION IS FURNISHED BY CLAYTON SIGNS, INC. 10' 0 " 1, TOP OF SIGN 5'_O " TOP OF BASE 5198 North Lake Drive B f DOUBLE -FACED INTERNALLY- ILLUMINATEDMONUMENTSIGN Lake City, GA 30260 ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE DRAWN BY BEN NORIDAY ACCOUNiREP BEtINOLLIDAf STORE NUMBER STORfADDRESS TxnORAwni61Sen0Rl61' a !ullPUausxfOD[slGn(R[AEDarnsnon s16NS. IrrtfilsU@ LTatREPR00uciD .(NAGEO,Do Cube nmr09nD9f LOCATION AGGREGATE SQUARE FOOTAGE - 60.OD SQUARE FEET 120VOLTS (HI(K - FIT - A DUTSIDfOf (OUR ( OrAPANY Ill WHOLE ORINPAP .I1;91XOWT' %Rmf1 �� 404.3fi1- 3800 fox 404- 361.7038 websile- www.claytonsigns.com UNLESS DRAWING DATE APRN2420n 2845 950 N.ELMHURSTROAD PERdRSSIDnER0E, t1xE01YN (RDF(TaviWSNAR.udun'6U(xACTO�R lifBESUBiEOTOIMMnommea (DURTOF(A1 �� DRAWING FILE CIA +.fOUNi PROSPECT, R BIGIIAGE (OR OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION DATE MOUNT PROSPECT, l 60056 ELEVATION END VIEW SCALE - Y2" = 1'- 0" SCALE - Y2" = 1'- 0" SPECIFICATIONS CABINET ALUMINUM CABINET HAS STEEL FRAME WITH .080 ALUMINUM CLADDING, RETAINERS AND FILLER. CHICK -FIL -A ICON ACRYLIC FACES DECORATED WITH TRANSLUCENT VINYL FILM ON SURFACE OF ACRYLIC. FACES ARE BACKLIT BY HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS SPACED EVENLY ON 12" CENTERS. DECORATIVE SKIRT SKIRT HAS STEEL FRAME WITH .080 ALUMINUM CLADDING. READER BOARD ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION CABINET WITH ACRYLIC FACES BACKLIT BY HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS SPACED EVENLY ON 12" CENTERS. TRACK ACCOMMODATES WAGNER ZIP LETTERS. This Product is Listed by UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES. INC. UL I and Bears The Mark: ALUMINUM SURFACES GRIPGARD #503 RED GLOSS FLEX FACES 230 -53 CARDINAL RED TRANSLUCENT VINYL FILM ACRYLIC FACES 7328 WHITE ACRYLIC ALUMINUM SURFACES WHITE NOTE: ICON SIDE OF SIGN SHOULD ALWAYS BE POSITIONED CLOSEST TO THE ROAD MASONRY WORK AND CONCRETE PAD FOR MASONRY WORK IS FURNISHED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SIGN FOUNDATION IS FURNISHED BY CLAYTON SIGNS, INC. ED. 3-5 " � 6'-8 " Ea. C? ? 1198 North Lake Drive L Lake City, GA 30260 �� 404 - 361 -3800 fax 404 -361 -7038 we isite - www.(Ioylonsigns.com 10' -0 " TOP OF SIGN 5' -0 " TOP OF BASE - - -- _ l Y�cli>Irl ; ''�rLtrl ; rl��rli;/i�rLYl ;l�lrli+r l�i�c4ul �_ Ark %rAus1A-A 0' -0" GRADE AT SIGN BASE 11' - 6 " 60.00 SQUARE FEET 0 00 CV c`"J ELEVATION END VIEW SCALE - 12 = 1'- 0" SCALE - 1 /2 " = 1'- 0" DOUBLE FACED INTERNALLY - ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGN AGGREGATE SQUARE FOOTAGE 6000SOUARE FEET DRAWING FILE - (FA - MOUNT PROSPECT, IL SIGNAGE (DR ALL ELECTRICAL rDR N BY BEN HOUIDAY SIGNS ARE UNT REP BENHOWDAY zo volrs UNLESS DATE APRIL 242011 OTHERWISE INDICATED ON DATE STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS TNISDRAfN1 R hNORwwAL. UNPUBLISHED D(S10 CREATED BY(LanON LOCATION 'A'S' 61( IT a Iwr r0 BE REPRODUCED (4411,!0 OR E):4181HO TO 14,011E 2845 (HICK - EL -A oUr$wE of HO RLYNDa DR l'IIEMWIC A2 950 N EUNNURSI ROAD rRtalsslo faA rnEOW aes.I:rc aazuin40wr :dt 8f MOUNT PROSPECT, It 60056 SO FEET f0 LEGAL AD 104 NI CCU ; I of (A® SPECIFICATIONS CHICK -FIL -A SCRIPT LETTERS LETTERS ARE LED - ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS MOUNTED ON ALUMINUM SURFACE OF BUILDING WITH TRANSFORMERS REMOTELY LOCATED BEHIND THE WALL IN UL APPROVED TRANSFORMER BOXES. FACES ARE 3/16" ACRYLIC RETURNS ARE .063 ALUMINUM BACKS ARE .080 ALUMINUM ALL RETURNS ARE ARC - WELDED TO LETTER BACKS CHANNEL LETTER FACES 2793 RED ACRYLIC TRIMCAP RETAINER - 1" RED JEWELITE TRIMCAP ALUMINUM RETURNS PAINTED MATTHEWS BRUSHED ALUMINUM This Product Is Listed by � I UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC. UL and Bears the Mark: ELEVATION 10' -5 " 3' -3 1/2" ----- - - - - -- I I I t I I i I I I I I i r` N i �n N SCALE - 3/4" = 1'- 0" 5198 North Lake Drive LED - ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTER WALL SIGN Lake City, GA 30260 ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE DRAWN BY BPI ACCOUNT REP BDIHDUIDAY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS [HICK THISDRARVUI GISAnORIGIIIAEW :PUBUSHED DESIGN CRUTEOBYCUY104 SIGUS 111 11 1, NOT TO BE REPRODULCO,(HANGI0. OR EXHIBITED IO AIIYOOE 'Iw1 LOCATION w 120 VOLTS -FIL -A OUP, IDEOF' IOUP.f OA IPAIIYI 404- 361 -3800 fax 404 -361 -7038 UNLESS DRAWING DATE aPRRiAtDII 2845 9SON.Elh1HUR5TR0AD NRMISSmurROFITOWIFor CuYlor.SIGnS,mCANYSUCHATIOII, AuY BE SUBJECT TO NGM KT100 III A COURT Or EMI WehSlte - WWW.(IOTtOnSIgOS.GOITI DRAWING PILE CFA- .IOUNI PROSPECT II SIGNAGE ECR OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION DATE MOUN1 PROSPE[T, Il 60056 Q2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPECIFICATIONS CHICK -FIL -A SCRIPT LETTERS LETTERS ARE LED - ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS MOUNTED ON ALUMINUM SURFACE OF BUILDING WITH TRANSFORMERS REMOTELY LOCATED BEHIND THE WALL IN UL APPROVED TRANSFORMER BOXES. FACES ARE 3/16" ACRYLIC RETURNS ARE .063 ALUMINUM BACKS ARE .080 ALUMINUM ALL RETURNS ARE ARC - WELDED TO LETTER BACKS CHANNEL LETTER FACES 2793 RED ACRYLIC TRIMCAP RETAINER - 1" RED JEWELITE TRIMCAP ALUMINUM RETURNS PAINTED MATTHEWS BRUSHED ALUMINUM This Product is Listed by UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC. UL and Bears the Marty: 2' -10" t i 25.26 SQUARE FEET 1 I t I t t I t t . I t t I r I r I a ELEVATION SCALE - 3/4" = 1'- 0" 5198 North Lake Drive LED- ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTER WALL SIGN ALL ELECTRICAL DRAWN BY BillHOIlIDAY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS INS ORAI' a': GIS1IIOB! 6ca,, WIPeBa5"rD0r9Ga(PEAlf7a(f +:i)'I G.6 n4 !i IJQt. PP�(o[ x IGID.N iTl ) LOCATION E Lake(ity,GA 30260 SIGNS ARE 120 VOLTS p((OUNTREP BENHOUIOAr CHICK -HE -A DusD I 404 - 3613800 fax 404 -361 -7038 n UNLESS DRAWING DATE APRILN2011 2845 950N EIMHURSTROAD fst.lssG o I , c.: aau !ALL D website - www.claytonsignsmin (CR DRA WING FlLE CPA � � Yd0Ua1 PROSPEQ it AGNAGi OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION GATE MOUNT PROSPECT, PROSPECT, IL 60056 ©2011 All RIHTS ESERVE RI R :fSfRVE D ' SPECIFICATIONS CHICK -FIL -A SCRIPT LETTERS LETTERS ARE LED - ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS MOUNTED ON ALUMINUM SURFACE OF BUILDING WITH TRANSFORMERS REMOTELY LOCATED BEHIND THE WALL IN UL APPROVED TRANSFORMER BOXES. FACES ARE 3/16" ACRYLIC RETURNS ARE .063 ALUMINUM BACKS ARE .080 ALUMINUM ALL RETURNS ARE ARC - WELDED TO LETTER BACKS CIP N 1 9 N 6' -0" CHANNEL LETTER FACES 2793 RED ACRYLIC TRIMCAP RETAINER - 1" RED JEWELITE TRIMCAP ALUMINUM RETURNS PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING COLOR This Product is Listed by UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES. INC. UL and Bears the Mark: ELEVATION in v SCALE - 1 " = 1'- 0" 5198 North Lake Drive LED - ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTER WALL SIGN A Lake City, GA 30260 SQUARE FOOTAGE (SIX LINES) 10.25 SQUAREFEET ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE 120 VOLTS DRAWN BY BEIIHOLUDAY ACCOUNT REP BENHOLLIDAY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS CHICK -FIL -A THIS oR AWJ: IGIS All ONGDIAnnIPUBNSHIDDESIG N CREATED ByRdnn'; S16NSI II( IIISr, OIEOatN PRODUCED, OIANGEDOREXHIBROIOANoDN Oil IDIOEY OUR COLVANYIN WHOLE ORINPARWNHCUtV MITE1 LOCATION 404 -361 -3800 fax 404 -361 -1038 SQUARE FOOTAGE (RECTANGULAR) 1740 SQUARE FEET �� ( V /eI1SlLe - WVIW.(IaytOO51J05.(0(fl UNLESS DRAWING GATE APRIL 24 toll 2845 950 N. EIMHURST ROAD PERAeSAOH fWA THE MIT Of CLAYTON SIGNS.n( ANY SUCH A(r104S Owr B!suelEa TO OCAL e(rlon me(OURIaf La7 DRAWING FILE CFA- r.f0UN1 PROSPfq HE SIGNAGE (OR OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION GATE MOUNT PROSPEO, It 60056 p Q2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPECIFICATIONS CHICK -FIL A SCRIPT LOGO SIGNS ARE LED ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS MOUNTED ON SURFACE OF BUILDING WITH TRANSFORMERS REMOTELY LOCATED BEHIND THE WALL IN UL APPROVED TRANSFORMER BOXES FACES ARE 3/16" THICK ACRYLIC. RETURNS ARE .050" ALUM. ARC WELDED TO .063" LETTER BACKS THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE AND /OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF SIGN. This Product is Listed By: UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. U` And Bears the Mark: _D AND EYE TO CHICK ELECTRICAL IN FROM — SOURCE (BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR) i CFA CHANNEL LETTER WIRING DIAGRAM ( BEHIND WALL VIEW) SCALE: 1 12" =1' -0" 5198 North Loke Drive Lake City, CA 30260 �/�� 404- 361 -3800 fox 404 -361 -7038 �a we6site - www.doytonsignsrom LETTERS SI WALL 3/8" SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1 1" RED JEWELITE RETAINER CAP 2 3/16" THICK #2793 RED ACRYLIC LETTER FACES 3 DURALED (UL APPROVED ) RED LED MODULES MODEL #L33010 -12 4 4 "DEEP, .050" ALUMINUM RETURN WELDED TO .063" LTR. BACKS AND PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING COLOR 5 120 VOLT CIRCUIT TO SIGN FULLY ENCLOSED REMOTE - MOUNTED JUSTIN INC. TRANSFORMER 6 (UL APPROVED) MODEL #C2240 -12 7 U.L. APPROVED PASS -THRUS 8 UL APPROVED GTO WIRE INSIDE FLEX CONDUIT ru vvuvu v i uu 110V PLUG IN ELECTRICAL AN DISCONNECT SWITCH( SUPPLI BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR r- COMB, BEA r - CONNECTEI SIGN ATTACHED W/ 3/8" BOLTS T . & WASHERS r e 12 VOLT WIRING, WHITE TO COMMON RED TO 12V UL APPROVED METALLIC UL LISTED 12v TRANSFORMER SEALTITE CONDUIT (Typ.) 9 INSIDE METAL UL APPROVED �LL_ II H ___ I _ TRANSFORMER BOX __I l_ This Product is Listed By: UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. U` And Bears the Mark: _D AND EYE TO CHICK ELECTRICAL IN FROM — SOURCE (BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR) i CFA CHANNEL LETTER WIRING DIAGRAM ( BEHIND WALL VIEW) SCALE: 1 12" =1' -0" 5198 North Loke Drive Lake City, CA 30260 �/�� 404- 361 -3800 fox 404 -361 -7038 �a we6site - www.doytonsignsrom LETTERS SI WALL 3/8" SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1 1" RED JEWELITE RETAINER CAP 2 3/16" THICK #2793 RED ACRYLIC LETTER FACES 3 DURALED (UL APPROVED ) RED LED MODULES MODEL #L33010 -12 4 4 "DEEP, .050" ALUMINUM RETURN WELDED TO .063" LTR. BACKS AND PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING COLOR 5 120 VOLT CIRCUIT TO SIGN FULLY ENCLOSED REMOTE - MOUNTED JUSTIN INC. TRANSFORMER 6 (UL APPROVED) MODEL #C2240 -12 7 U.L. APPROVED PASS -THRUS 8 UL APPROVED GTO WIRE INSIDE FLEX CONDUIT 36' -0 " THIS MEASUREMENT IS OF THE SIGN FACE WHEN FLATTENED OUT 31'- 6" THE ORIGINAL CHICKEN S� SPECIFICATIONS BACKGROUND PANEL THE BACKGROUND PANEL IS ALPOLIC COMPOSITE MATERIAL SHAPED TO MATCH THE CURVE OF THE BUILDING, GRAPHICS 3/4" DEEP DIMENSIONAL LETTERS MOUNTED ON BACKGROUND PANEL WITH '/2 "STAND -OFF if m ALUMINUM SURFACES MATTHEWS BRUSHED ALUMINUM PAINT LETTERS BLACK SINTRA This Product Is Listed by UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC. U� and Bears the Mark: ELEVATION THE ORIGINAL CHICKEN SANDWICH DAY NIGHT SCALE - 1/4" = 1'- 0" IT I - - - -- I _ - 011 I I PENN 26'- 8" WALL 3"ALUMINUM CHANNEL ALPOLIC METAL PANEL 3/4" DEEP DIMENSIONAL LETTER ' /2"STAND -OFF 1" STAND -OFF WHITE LED'S END VIEW 36.75 SQUARE FEET 19f 5198 North Lake Drive Lake City, GA 30260 404.361 -3800 (ax 404 -361 -7038 website - www.daytonsignmom E— _ SCALE - 3/4" = 1'- 0" 9 ' -4" J —, PLAN VIEW SCALE - 1/8" = 1'- 0" SPECIFICATIONS CABINET ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION CABINET .080 ALUMINUM CLADDING, RETAINERS AND FILLER. GRAPHICS ACRYLIC FACES DECORATED WITH TRANSLUCENT VINYL FILM ON SURFACE OF ACRYLIC. FACES ARE BACKLIT BY HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS. STEEL POLE 4" x 12" STEEL POLE This Product is Listed by UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC. U� Cl and Bears the Mark: Sl - 0 N ALUMINUM SURFACES GRIPGARD #503 RED GLOSS ACRYLIC FACES 230 -53 CARDINAL RED TRANSLUCENT VINYL FILM ALUMINUM SURFACES RST584 AKZO NOBEL GLOSS ACRYLIC FACES 7328 WHITE ACRYLIC 3' -0" 0 C� TRY TO KEEP DIRECTIONALS 5' -0" FROM CURBS WHEREVER POSSIBLE TO INSURE VEHICLES DON'T HIT THEM I I I � V -8 I I 1 I I I � I 3' -6 " TOP OF SIGN F IN LOCATIONS NORTH OF TENN. & N. CAROLINA SEE NOTE THE FOOTINGS MUST BE 3' -0" DEEP DUE TO THE FROST LINE BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION ALL OTHERS TO BE 2'- 0" DEEP 5198 North Lake Drive DOUBLE -FACED INTERNALLY-ILLUMINATED DIRECTIONAL SIGN ALL ELECTRICAL DRAWN BY BEEFHOUIDAY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS THIS DRAWI=; GISeU ORIGBId, UVIIHiSHEDD61G, TREATED Br(EAflO'I Lake City, GA 30260 SOUARE FOOTAGE - 600SOUAREFEET A 120 VOLTS ACCOUEREPBEN OLLIDAY CHICK-FIL-A iIGIIS VIC ITIS40 1TOBEREFRODUCEOCHAUGIO .09U41BITEDTOA;.,CIf OUTSIDE OIr0URC 04 LOCATION 404 - 361 -3800 fox404- 361 -7038 website - www.clayionsigns.com UNLESS DRAWIR7 11 �� 950 N.ELMHURSTROAD 7EahK90NERO:f7HE(i1dR Cl:r7M ,inus1:u:arsucwm,I<_ M. ,Bf S1181Ep TO LEGAL ArROr, OT Ed.; DRAWING FILE CIA ?AOUNIPROSPECT, IL SIGNAGE (OR OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION DATE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 ©2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 10 112" SPECIFICATIONS RESERVED RESERVED. SIGN PANELS FAA ®G PARKING PANELS ARE .080 ALUMINUM WITH REFLECTIVE BACKGROUND _ I° AND GRAPHICS. SIGN POSTS ALABAMA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA CONNECTICUT FLORIDA POSTS ARE 2" x 2" SQUARE 12 x 18• 12 x 18' 18 x 24 12 x 24 12 x 18* ALUMINUM TUBING CAPPED ON TOP 7' -6" 7' -6" fi TOP OF PANEL TOP OF PANEL �PARKBG aA R valililnc ALUMINUM POSTS �� PAINTED MATTHEWS BRUSHED ALUMINUM GEORGIA HAWAII HAWAII MASSACHUSETTES MINNESOTA 12X18 12x18' 12x18• 12x18 12x18' 6' -0" 6' 0" BOTTOM OF PANEL BOTTOM OF PANEL 5' -3" R PARNING v,. BOTTOM OF PANEL Ll asnrni aar MISSOURI MISSOURI MISSOURI NEVADA NEW JERSEY 12X18 12X6 12X6 12x18' 10X12 RESERYEO RESERVE RIRKING PARKING - - - -- MAXIMUM VAN PENALTY $250 ACCESSIBLE P[xatr PENALTY — 5250 5250 $250 N. CAROLINA N. CAROLINA N. CAROLINA N. CAROLINA PENNSYLVANIA 12X9 12X9 12X26 12X26 12x18 RESERVED PARKING ® ® RESERVED PARKING . aAN�c O S FLORDIA TEXAS VIRGINIA VIRGINIA WASHINGTON 12X18 12X24 12X18 12X12 12x18' GRADE AT SIGN BASE GRADE AT SIGN BASE I - I I NOTE: IF THIS SIGN IS LOCATED ON THE SIDEWALK THEN IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A PVC SLEEVE INTO THE CONCRETE WHEN THE SIDEWALK IS POURED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE SIGN' BY CLAYTON SIGNS. 5198 North Lake Drive ALL ELECTRICAL ORAWNBY BEHHOWDAY STORENUMBER STOREADDRESS THISDRAW% ISANORIG] Nk UUPUBUSHIDO ESiGI(RIAI[0¢Y(t4tt01I LOCATION Lake City, GA 30260 SINGLE -FACED DOT REGULATORY TRAFFIC SIGNS SIGNS ARE ACCOUNTREP BUIHOUIDAY CHICK -FIL -A SIfa 1 1101 TO 01 R000( OUTSIDEOfYOURMI PA E UIHOIIIVRIOP ) I 404 -361 -3800 fox404- 361 -7038 120 VOLTS 2$45 PER1. 1155! OtIfRWdINEOWIIEROffEAr101151G !15 rIC +IrwcHnnals UNLESS DRAWING DATE APRatAiml 950 N.EIAIHURSTROAD mYBESUREaID1EGAIAnIOnl4ecauRlDUAw Website - wwWdaytonsigns.c °m DRAWING FILE CFA "OUNI PROSPECL IE SIGBAGE COR OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION DATE PAOUNT PROSPEO, IL 6004 ©2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPECIFICATIONS SIGN PANELS PANELS ARE .080 ALUMINUM WITH REFLECTIVE BACKGROUND AND GRAPHICS. SIGN POSTS POSTS ARE 3" x 3" SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBING CAPPED ON TOP SIGN PANEL RED REFLECTIVE SIGN PANEL WHITE REFLECTIVE s ALUMINUM POSTS PAINTED MATTHEWS BRUSHED ALUMINUM 2' -6" PANEL 6' -0" BOTTOM OF PANEL ! u IN LOCATIONS NORTH OF TENN. & N. CAROLINA SEE NOTE THE FOOTINGS MUST BE 3' -0" DEEP DUE TO THE FROST LINE BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION ALL OTHERS TO BE 1'- 6" DEEP 5198 North Lake Drive ALL ELECTRICAL DRAWN BY BEIIH0tUOAY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS RHIS DRAWING IS Ali OR IGIN ALUHRUBUSHEDDESIGH (RIVED BI(oll": LakeCit Y SINGLE FACEDDOTREGULATORYTRAFRCSIGNS SIGNS ARE ACCOUNT REP SIRHGWDAI (HICK -Ell -A SIGNS. Ir lu nsIV10BEREPRODUCED ,cuirfo011011HEDIDSr.'0l( SIDE OrIE I'I R lHI1NWi uPllE LOCATION ,GA30260 - 361.3800 fax 404 -361 -7038 I Aot 120 VOLTS DeawlND OarB aPRlua tml I 2845 950 N. ELMHURST ROAD I U[GR RERWStussloaA BE THE VSUBJEOI f eN UNLESS gar f B(SUBIEO i0 OEGAI A(A01011 Ul A website - www.claytonsigns.com DRAWING FILE ccA ,M0011 PROSPER It SIGNAGE (DR OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION DATE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Q 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SPECIFICATIONS SIGN PANELS PANELS ARE .080 ALUMINUM WITH REFLECTIVE BACKGROUND AND GRAPHICS. S IGN POSTS POSTS ARE 3" x 3" SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBING CAPPED ON TOP SIGN PANEL RED REFLECTIVE SIGN POST GRIPGARD #503 RED GLOSS SIGN PANEL WHITE REFLECTIVE N 8' -6" BOTTOM OF PANEL DOUBLE -FACED ALUMINUM POSTS PAINTED MATTHEWS BRUSHED ALUMINUM 6' -0" BOTTOM OF PANEL SIDE B n IN LOCATIONS NORTH OF l TENN. & N. CAROLINA SEE NOTE THE FOOTINGS MUST BE 3' -0" DEEP DUE TO THE FRONT LINE BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION ALL OTHERS TO BE 1'- 6" DEEP 1' -0 " 5198 North Lake Drive L I LakeCit,GA30260 Y SINGLE -FACED DOT REGULATORY TRAFFIC SIGNS ALL ELECTRICAL SIGNS ARE Y BENHOLDOAY REP BEN JIMMY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS CHICK -FIL -A IN ISOP. AYnl: G11AnORIGnatW1PU8L15MEDDE51G8 (REA111BY(LAYT0l1 6ngL' 1U I1510110 BE P, EPROW( FO.(XAiIG[O.ORERHIBIIEOIOUirOaE NE OUTSIDE OF(OUR COMPANY 11 MOLE OR III PART YAIHOUI !TRI-1 LOCATION 403 IA 4.61 -3800 fax 404 -361 -7038 " 7t v+ehsile - www.daylonsigns.(om 120 VOLTS UNLESS OATE 01111242011 LREVISION 2845 9SO N. ELMHURST ROAD fRaS SIONFRO ^.Iix[mriLROr[unmislGns. r¢ aursu[HA[tlovs M1UYdE SUBJECT TO Of ACTION! III S. RIC 01 LCW DRAWING FILE (fA [10UH1 PROSPECT It SIG'IAGEiOR OTHERWISE INDICATED DATE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 ©2011 AU RIGHTS RESERVED 2' -6° Gold Anodlzed Spun AJuminum Ball. Flush Seam Cast Aluminum Truck ReyoMng Non - Fouling Type ieeorvo Halyard IOPIIONALI Swivel Snaps &Covers / Halyard (Rope( Halyard Cover lOptlonai) Cleat Cover Box (Optional) 9"Cost Aluminum Cleat 3 01-051 (Optional) 9'Cast Aluminum Cleat FOUNDATION SIZES San Coll Flash Coll Flash HEIGHT A B C 20' 3'6" 30" 24 25' 3'6" 30" 24" 30' 3 30" 24" Numinum Flash Collar 35' 4 36" 30" 3000 PSI Concrete Hardwood Wedges (Supplied by Othe 40' 4'6" 42" 36" rs) with Packed E Dry Sand FountlaNOn Sleeve GROUND SLEEVE AND CONCRETE INSTALLED Ho }Dip BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR GaNanlzed Steel POLE INSTALLED ON PRE - INSTALLED GROUND Steel Centering Wedges SLEEVE BY SIGN CONTRACTOR S }eel Base Plate Steel support plate • !)• Welded To Ground Spike C B I 5198 North Lake Drive ALL ELECTRICAL DRAWN BY BENNOLLIOAY STORE NUMBER STORE ADDRESS THIS BRATI!, 66. 1: OPIGNA (UnPuBOSHIOBESIGU(PEAIED8,00011 1 LakeCii,GA 30260 FLAGPOLE SIGNSARE AC(OUNTREP BENHOLUOAr uas rrta1"W11 BEREPROWOO,(I IGf0.oRe:NIBn(DlcAmonE LOCATION y 20 V ALTS CHICK -FIL -A Oui$10 DI BUJ ? (Bf:1PAHt f.; fl(NU BP I1IPABi Pi11NOUTwNITO 404 - 361 -3800 fax 404 -361 -7038 I DRAWINGDATE APNIN2011 2845 950N EIMHURSTROAO R: NSSro;IFPaarNfoenl(ROrnAWC;,swus m( Arrnu(NAolm1 O UNLESS ]A BE SUBIECI TO fiGAI AON N NI (OURI Or fA;1 wehsile - www.doytonsigns.rom DRAWING FILE CFA.7dOWIT PMPE(1.IL SIG1iAGE(DE OTHERWISE INDICATED REVISION DATE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 ©2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 451 S1011 48" 4211 50' S'6" 48" 42" ALL WINDOW GRAPHICS ARE HIGH PERFORMANCE VINYL FILM EXCEPT FOR THE ADDRESS NUMBERS WHICH ARE REFLECTIVE J 5' -2" TOP OF GRAPHICS STORE HOURS RED HIGH PERFORMANCE' MONDAY - SATURDAY VINYL FILM 6 :00 AM - 10:00 PM 1 "TALL RED LETTERS b,« CLOSED SUNDAY REDYHIGH P ERFORMANCE' 1" TALL "NO SOLICITING" NO SOLICITING RED HIGH PERFORMANCE' VINYL FILM 0 � FLOOR 5198 North Lake Drive Lake City, GA 30260 /f 404.361 - 3800 fax 404 -361 -7038 m at wehsite - www.claytonsigns.com N 11 SMOKE FREE ENVIRONMENT RED HIGH PERFORMANCE VINYL FILM MAIN ENTRY ELEVATION SCALE - 1/8" = 1'- 0" ALL WINDOW GRAPHICS ARE HIGH PERFORMANCE VINYL FILM EXCEPT FOR THE ADDRESS NUMBERS WHICH ARE REFLECTIVE STORE HOURS 1 TALL RED LETTERS RED HIGH PERFORMANCE' VINYL FILM MONDAY - SATURDAY 6:00 AM -10:00 PM 1" TALL RED LETTERS CLOSED SUNDAY RED INYL FILMERFORMANCE' 1" TALL "NO SOLICITING" NO SOLICITING RED HIGH PERFORMANCE' VINYL FILM 1234 8" TALL ADDRESS NUMBERS RED REFLECTIVE VINYL FILM F VERIFY ADDRESS BEFORE MAKING NUMBERS N 11 SMOKE FREE ENVIRONMENT RED HIGH PERFORMANCE VINYL FILM Age 5198 North Lake Drive Lake City, GA 30260 404-361-3800 lax 404 -361 -1038 wehsite - www.daytonsignssam MAIN ENTRY ELEVATION SCALE - 1/8" = 1'- 0" 3 z s 'L S .§ � s s ^g3 �no SSA 9§ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: mra�: w � x M+e- cx,.e. xmtcximc er nwr « nc " t � x xw mxovA�`turi�i w �v. roxrinr � wxm! AwoE io Ix�L p MI � T lMY IELWGF� KKWR t0. txw q pppx[xt rxgtlY, x OGIX tVprtt, Vhlllti fgl(OA GxP(!t gfErvW T'M 4fWl.0 anx. q m um twa ta®xwr v tm a�mce ., .sx xo wra a wsm .awu - ow wo i� wuwxiaxa .s w`�' ru .� xo�wocm m xoaa� Aix v x « u®xm gxmrt uowxm swesxx. CEO � AW Wf1ER S ocrzcrAEVC rrnxwc S1TE KEY NOTES wo. oExa p" Q srcv pat Q 'op Wr E-- snv Qi ro� cxosww stfx Q Acassieu aeFwxc s�cn O8 PHNRp ICCESSBLf PMWrvC 8rW1a O STOP 8tR Oi oLOEtitnwt P+ObSglli (y' SrewmJ O 9oExxx (x c 4cRm O pxECfgxry WxW 50 -xu tx m 1� xtru BMno K GJtOR' plUExWG SrArpx 0 xOnvgm Srx I® OxFCrgtwl SCn Ix CLEMIJME &K IS pN�O:Mi YAiNC 0.9Fn 18 ALUNARIY HxIprWL 1© FtIG PoIE 1� PEFlISC ENCLpSURE aYVHC st'nLE iry FElT ,ogp ei SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS MOUNT PROSPECT RAND ROAD AND ELMHURST ROAD COUNTY OF COOK STATE OF ILLINOIS a R a . 7 4 y i ;ao a�E $ �3 ■ 30 UTILITY CONTACTS 0101 nti -MM faS 5lR+GL' `101 C0 rxulap t p1n - {MR 111 -KAI 1fIID1KlIE SFIMCC.' air WR pew WARNING GALLBEFGRE YOV GIG 11ro �. 4 px1 Wil avwW 801111 YW1 3[RIICC oAa W�uR aMry W..pW � L pY1 wilR 60aAGC �..w1er nwn.alu WI) WO -l1�6 L uv1 PREPARED BY: 181s so,rtn ANym Row S t120 WOOLPERT nnhnroaAT�lncw IL801a1 .....1.n...w1.+..+.�.. uo.sxa.mao TJVC Ba0196.9T11 SHEETINDEX OR-4 waE11 IE D APPLICANT /DEVELOPER: CHICK— FIL —A, INC. 5206 allFFINGTON RD. ATLANTA GEORGIA 30349 -2998 CONTACT: SCOTT D. PATMAN PHONE: 404 -305 -4594 FAX: 404 - 684 -6550 8 7 b� ! k�g EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND: ua o - °N-- - -- -P -- ufrc�rxo 6b P vMAn — rllp lK :n ro.a rr� M • use w satyr � u .a ,.wco wo. cwenm cww B � L ws* wwa. w.� � � wwnm rv,. uanox w �m � tuwmx M x f h9 hMl wMALC Mf OW[Ip o Y vw.wu ea�ma waK ® nc. arwo.w sa«� w,c uw rwua� \ m m�a r E .d �i1E -.r • wrr t � f.� •. -� k s + � r 3 i gi O-I ^sl fi ys s s of A \\ \ 1 y 1 Ilk IL BENCHMARK: ro"`x aoo gr = vs, got: a' nriu�r w .Paxo�im �r mumvsrcrd, ov seumrur r warn - ss 9rz u+a owwwc rw srcmow niwaox . �,• I ! ! � 1 I ! ' I I E I � I , I b 4 f� s y � I O I , � s 1 1 s s rnrrYC swf IN w E kF C E G e ea L R a E g R B boa SR � f d� 9 RO b ep CPIPHC 4fNE x Fw R S Y � 'f tj ?T f n .$ �?s STORM STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE ID DESCRIPTIDN RIM/GRATE WERT 1.0 EdWp aw<n BoYn 611.]1 1I !'r . 661, .166.11 m• . mur GRADING LEGEND ._..- ...... . ......... 6Rg.--- ..... __...__ CXISiXIa 1' EA1IiW11 -- -� -- ---61 wiaroaEO 1' coxmue - WmPa6EO s enwroln I�4 PIgPOSFD sl oau ]KAKI o--�Ii +l+aPOSL6 RaaF oRAx — — — — — — — — w1fETwXe muwce s16vE � sa iurc WIW . nmoe e G c-0 WRY t W. ■RECTW a flaw �► aXaaAwa Raw 110111E >40 !]EYTXW AT fOP K wm awn ELEVAIXRI AT T6P aF PAYEIIpR eitvAllaw R laP OF A/9 f� flEYAINw T TOP aP wAU[ ® ELLW1XlX XT SIPoICNAE lul ® EX61AG F1FlTi0X ■ Md'OSM GIaX f14Lw � RR6PO6Ep 1!!Ll YXFI • PROPOY!! M Iw.w54Y 0 MOKSLA N M sECTpI GRADING NOTES 1. OONIWf6i 911aM1 11E fall 16FFJIOICE aXLY. T. aE f A — %im m EmIK iN smmI w LATER r. RESTORE FLA 4TRFEf SLfdRaCS•, W++! '�S. WLYFAIS. M6 DE OPNX macs. R T ARE 06NPBm aR OXLLH1dl As A R 7 OF COws116101px 14T6lOFS TO ANiWI T A YRXYUY E]o51wC COXWTW6 1. fAM1gL1 XAWX'11 AIXI YEM00 OF XW' AVa EGE4 lA]N XWRW. P[a6lWAAl OR YEIYNWI TRKfIC W fXE YKIXIIY�AIL� aQ aRB - a�luECr ro rcW1T1W1 Ain wRnrEY APWlrwL or NPP4Aa11E calwwln AcniaES. S. EpM1Y M 6 Fl YE N TXFPFn WOOL EIEYATDNS, [5. A 1p SRWOOL OF ALL txilr6p U1XIfIE9 MYXWI AIL TO eE w+ M W OIi SRL ALA! E[N1110YS FAOM RlA4 WraW+nnfOfl 6N4A RE PIOAOEa ro Me Iwl{cll wRIIWG WTI.�� IIa1RL5 AVa P@OR m ME STMT a CRCIIMY:IOV liµ SNWR➢ TIE [ONIPICIVR sw,T Moll w11i101IT M1p IK FlCX4Fli of Ntt plGRFPANOEi 1[ Nu AtAOIE Alt XESRW86NlT OF 111E'waf6i IIEDE>aftf 10 aWIf ME PROTECT. 6 Atl PIIL riE FMriMI'Frt➢ RIiAC gE REPI/dEa NA t+OX11Ef.TFD ro 111E STdW sC11FR SisTWI AW IOGTm Avi XnnV'Elp aN q�appp PuX6 [M 111E OOVIRiL40R. /. �SIORN OMIIASE fA1HIRUCIXXI 5 lWA BE P[ %GRiIFil W ACOOiN.x`E alLVgE aF YWwf fMlMLf. G 10 MM XS=-V o NRR CQWEWM)NS 0. PP-0P� 1gwTgTX)X ro W: PRflrllEL fR1Y ERO O< PP LO !1W W SC.'E� ROWwAY. ETC. ro EilS1Wa CRWE. ff ME M PESiWU of ME a0N5TR1a110I1 L ■ f (eSPOrBi■ulT ar IttC WXIXRaIaR. wsAS SH41 t[ RFSiORFn Ta PRENKiPoICIpw COXOivW l0 TK lA14Fw:Ip1 of TX OMIiFR. 10.RWTWt ro ARWSI wLL Cu41M unurt llwellXwS ro PfgPaSEp Il. �� eorloY Rr uAppua ,wo uscx 61s6LS uusr eE 14. RIlY. AOE IIXCfl+LWYX3 MI SEEPS We �wwX� [xml>xT&aFa, IATpIO to SSgXA SL1YA lISTEW CR MYl1aIR Al ME mTTbl aF ME F61 YOPE. 11 Au WaryR6Lp AwW 8wY1 I1µ[ 11]E^a11Awi SaFpXO +VXI Yu� 11. CMlwu:lm UI P— IfiKX4 N■ IlSE65 mM dRfL'fIlNS WMNPL+xCF wRn ewXC WC ERQEgXO 1:m (tl9 W NL P a! w m WNRIC s r�EC w REl a g yq � R � ^g � yyyy sa I ff MOB I, DIE MNRP mrwL 9E1[ut SYSr•18 stcaoX FrLn aF[LE uuer eE xomm AT m�'e -s e� �}.I�c ars vreors ro mE eawExmlort ar wa {r ei ]. ALL FLOOR PIW1B SIIXIL [6G4Ra m 1ME &YRMff BErFII SYSI[w. I o Is xn roorwa al.6 sFwl wsalwaE m m mEY a. NL Ruc aamY swurAar sExrm woven. LNP Nsn srow sEREw �aXrs w A cawewm AWFA NS/y SNYL W WOPM ro rS1Y P — Ntl ASfY P -TW ' >, NL SAYVA,' urea mxarmlcrow, AI• wao STPfi1 5[vFA oOxS1mR110x x caelco ae[rrt wsw, REOVI✓Ea sml¢ RDORw Va• ro I N 9:[, ww � ul•ww nlaafss mI11L m I! r,E aulsroE a a li[E •.rLt pPE, Bur wor IEffi Twx rouw la) alrnm wow YoaE r1W1 [1rRa (a) uc s i8o i TFrt WP w 110! PIPE wiEMi5X0 RC ��Fp ar w6r 1Y 0.& MWC-SW O XPWWE g� °K r w MM aE Ism w M P. MIEY aaMXEOIRIG ro AX ELSM1YP s[x,En YN! 91 ur.Yn O1NFR f1Y11 9 Y C BE � PI of EihTN6 WNIOIL pYE OF InE FGLOx1XG YflIw10S te a) CwOKM ELw -art aP SIhFR wwx m paptx I 8- {SI.rLl -TAP Mle-mE Y9nF ewq N`0 PAPPm x91NlAiIPX ar . swaE PR ®L� � w w eaVIQi sEal w TMe r01' Or OIE y Rml %Pe nnrw, Ir.,<v AaP Atyzw.xr[i W+ our o[9RO ulanl ar p m` E i P s I �nxrc / �r �Y � � uelXC �awo -sui• ea sarwe YNYIE YEIRMJiL WI faOY 1NC mP W r C SMO m 11EWY I W THE WLEKWIN w K la "m FIRIIIflvwc A YXLLW waaLaRK 96rNXl w 1P FTET 6E1rEEw SWRMM Nm SflW1G AAP wATEJww6 91YI1. K AIPEIrI11ETl IRILM- M 6 LW w A SL'NN1E TKWK Iaxvxc A YMYIIY ,e YERmII SF➢NGll9r{ PK 11E R PP= 6 Wa W 9E SxllE rRFIICX Nlllf iN[ WAfmIWX IAGTm iNE OPI'pIIT 9P[ W A Ptw 1 A u F rx uxonrwPEEO wml, XFEPi1C xxuu e• w Rnr a srvew.mX. s M TXE xnllcx aR XpataxnE gSrruK£8 OESEAI!m Aeoxr GWXPT x uwxrwxm. as M �rfn nns ARPIE TxE YAirnleEl, rXC x w wLL w caaTSrcmP ro Ruwxlol srAXOwns B[ u b r mu�iwx w[I�m¢ w aE� IBYmalm rxws auu IM NE SYt �,.[. A � YWXaE9. xlo AI.SP STORY wwHaa w OOA•I SLrfR �. . ww.www .� 9PNEYA aE .R way, N� 9WL s SrA TM w RXE Ow RE -CAST REP TO mxCPEIE. c - Exs A ra r Kom rttx u rxIESS mEa wa coxrPRww6 m ASM �ulo o swu eE vs[a C arwFrOflE PIPE LywxECROX, 12. AIL 1w1ET NIP WHET Pi6 aF SNKTNK SER[R WNXafs AXP anIE9 VMPEA afWR`RgFS GRIP w EOIBUFL 5[frn waF R RL9P NL GUBFIV/ErORY SCrFR I4N10.LS. GfG, 8F914. RMS MO IMPGaRawO 9IaM1Ia[ �= W Ja1XED 11rIH xMSEK - WW M M` � lol¢ m+ m rcsry. - saa um c - us rrm sruaEa arm 14 I 5 L 1 •• 4 \ rl \�� 1E3 \1 L Y�� •p \o �\ � y am` ` �• , ,,,- 8ENCHMARK: rHe aws of [LtualPls \\ \\ raw Rao ur - vsr s»E oP Ew an. wpar.,e• s Err[ YwaaArlwa °F °0 � \\ nnxrox _ 1 `'` �• I d I ®� w' 7 5 I I I I 1 i I - 1 r � \ 1 I }¢_7 I UTILITY LEGEND N � - �--i — F1wPeta rmRU EwM — �• <�- <— mrronP mw PIU,1 ��[. --- MoS9P sxaralrr 9rEK wiK ur 1 � rnwgrc u[ rRa� q[clac a .t — rROPOQ9 uit+oRw ' • Pnro9n YLrr<E wgrP[[P rH[,InaRXlr X' I Q • pmwvm alw wEK K CRCAY • %MGEFa'YLM �1 • pomin VLX Yxa! IIAY • %a®IR Dux our CIS IIFoPasrp P/w InILT 11 LI dR p[OPDSEO Lx:Nf rats I }¢_7 I LAYOUT NOTES O 1 OJ. fwK PaaT[Lrlw wxACE M «e CONNEL'Ik1X m [K ,V— 1 M/ YK E = PPIESIIa — SWAEE �P a /a' LSr m WYPS[W POST 4lraawer WWS'fd PSI MLRAxr 0R u m wuYBwa pN6J Ivq CfPNOYENf COXNELIIOII X' I Q ©ru[ weoKwr K CRCAY lmw4ww _ I l I Qe rROrosm c 5 sEmna[ fsu w[[ ,) CaOa mm CAS IEttR MTA4A wM C'A � S 'sv COY y CIS 19 WPERCfdLw mwwrr rrxErrlorlE SEP.NCE I.0 IqR P) IE EE p I�r �l w u manna rRAxsrowlw Pw {sEE nOrE s) J IE IRIDLiJ0aIW1 sEOO1loAws [,Etnac rax+se (s¢ XorE P) PRWNM I19nna I! j� UTILITY NOTES I 1 Il ,. wu:aK rvc ,mt Frias, un P�wEE TrIE rvs oven wo cti5 sFArrE I � ) I r II uP m Awo 1xnYnXC rxt wLLx. Ir IYxwa a cow[ETe rnlax m ns sEwxlu ixsr nw, coxnperPR ro IwonoE {I) ..a• salmu�t w I mn ro wwRSl, ua wsEUi IEl - : sar[wc ,o we yI I Y i p •I I" Pu'ONR FLk T6lPIgNE 5[ANfi iKOII rdif Pmasl. m RV4PN0. -Kim 9JPPLY. PNQ'GE NiP R6fw1 PPoY_Ntf TfltPIIPXC SFw 'ICE. I ]. OOXIPXCfOR ro f1LRXEYI un w61NL {S] � i sCIS,WIE �P p aoxaRn ram %nL KW[ I ma ParYrr clwc 9F%L oowm ro PIp�'IX NIP E6 PNLL EIFCRb: SEaaCE [btIXK PR m PRwa AYP E6rA[L 11wYVVRYER PAP AXP xfrLx P R P eIFALE M Arrnmw+c[ IAm mY[o srECrr.InWS.woWruvc 1. AIL SIVN1 YYOn 9YLL 6E arw5 N PEXYpYf1P CPNCAEIE pPE COMrOMnN: ro ASSN e ll�f Jl 811XIL s[ a.Oa 1 cn KM COYPN:R9 G -0. a pu mmcc urKS Axo IraP w CWXrFra6 m srsrELl laws AR[ PaPLYR[P m eE w1alETnr rLUwin RrtcXS mxX[CIw m NRLEa % %NG 6149E !F'P.x 1S, uTE31' tLnGL tat, 1. TXE Maw+na 9JR[All slwL eE Yomm as 161E6 w A9YAwr m wnss5 IIE 11091 AI B41 -Ea] -4153. L ALL W 111E.[ OF Ya1RIT fgOSPkn NIP YW,mao, r, ALL IWFA IV1M EaIIaIRaCnPM SNNt wEEI DIE WYII1RLYprt6 Di ix[ xruAq P xWXf PRPSP[W. a m PPP .x 9HaIPDXN OF ALL V.VE9 YwXS •nx nIe y lLAOC a wouxr Prm�Ea. wAPE 9v1L eE mw1 s raPoPXO an wTrF. A PWIwFGrOR 9Wl m Y[Er ML r x 10. ALL SWTN[Y E WAU. OE CONSTKCrM PE M 9oR -3e uxltm LVpGlCO PnfkRSE ,,. rm nI( Lxeou[rLT+EO 9NIL PE RerxArF9 LIP/M Im ro nc szwar srv[ s sew .xP LPPAim .wP uulnlm oX Imram %LS er mE roxrncleR. 12 ALL SmPoI MwNNY: mNSffilCS lx SWLL 9E RWUKwFA M ACOPPOA4[t wrN THE MLACE w I1a1Rlr rlao9cls NIP YXRp;C. IS Iyu1Wr9M PR1E19. AMP arXFA ClF Sp1FR CDN. M colKlPXa ro m sYUrNrr. urEx srnEY wa: PlmxlarEa ,•. wplMmmBD� of w9elats AAP Gras ax9Xa lusr aE ,d u s sT9�i "aK�ru rxr�rn rt' A' ova anPE 10. Iti PRarDSF9 pp5 CawrarlPlb m meliXO OR PROrasED uwMaFs swu cnlraaY ro Aarlr -cx3a o w eo wAwxc SCNE IX FTET a n FFy K d 4 a X R� S= �a €.s.5 5 €m og� SITE t- IGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE xANUF,cPI�, � o�P�x Dc -kc mx EP lmx 1mE ] OmTmo mu wo > xw Irtdr w x m na+. nx DnwNN xy-u. fur � I ZZ PFd xffi LR11giN G4FS RSF1 -1WAN - 1205PtN " 0.1 O. 4.6 1.7 0. aae n, Su s1w rlF sin FIRS o Nxw.'zC 0. AW w rr lark oc Fulune sac snx xoux,Fn +mx lwe a usrmeuuor� AD tirmoRN u ,�, RousE moE swElo s .xu nnr ",.a fexs. Rtima oero; ermxzE lAwl A Uri Rm-- RSW H4 12P9i091/W POIE ZV 5Q 511NCxr sler>_ rn51e O.PIi ..zc N I �t� I 0.1 0.3 �A'.6 0 0, :0ji 0. III 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.Z" ��2 0. I WER 10 SIRCKILWJ. MWOS FOR EMT POLE CASE Dim ms TYPICAL POLE BASE DETAIL xar ro scac za ao eo cwnlc war w Frcr 0.0 0.0 0.1 O. 4.6 1.7 0. 114 0. 0.0 0.1 01 0.1 r .4 .7 0.8 1,1 5.4 1,¢ 0. \ ' Nfu nv. /nin �aavinin v �,. C SA I A I 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 .33 1.9 4.0 2.8 4.9 3.0 '9. � I � 0.0 0.1 O.l 0.1 .4 .7 1.1 4.2 2. ,1 5 1 QIaF 0. �Iw 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 .7 2.7 1.9 .9 0 39 .9 4 1. I +II I C�14 O, sc N'65f q4.1 5o A, pH4�pE� I 010 0.0 010 0.1 011 .2 .8 1.8 5.3 2.5 ' o sE �Nzs .62'5 0. rr i �y O. R {F SA (; 1 I 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 .2 .3 1.0 11 2. 1. 1.3 ,i .9 3. N2.7 1.6 01 3 0. 5C 1+ 0.0 0 Q.9 2.2 3.4 4.3 2. 1. 1 O, 1, ,6 4 2. x 0.7 0. 0,2 0, O ` 0.0`. 1 1 0 10.6 2. 3.7 1. 1. 2. 2.7 3.1 3.5 ,9 0.1 0.1 0.1 O. " SA 0.0 0.0 � 7.9 0., 1. 1. 4.0 2.5 2.3 33 O 5. \1.8 .`` 0.1 I O.P 0.1 0, 1. 3.2 4.6 2 1 .7 7 .2 O� 4�r . SA BARE G _ LCHT POLE 0.1 0.3 Cti \ 1 2.3 1 . 0,6 0,21 0.1 C ND ro w�ic "W'F. eaxD m �`�� ' 1 O MKKR WS fLR+90 0.2 0.8 2 0 4.8 4 1.5 . S1 0.2 t 0.1 0.1 10.0 Wk -- COWEM ME SASE 8 N t*wx K NSA 0.2 0.5 �p . 3 4. 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0�. 14 Y.W Oft COPPER 24'W PAVED ya i ✓ GROUND WRE M MED DP+'0E `` , 0.2 0.7 4 `� 4 8 1.8 1 .5 0,8 0.3 01 0.0 0.0 are• K 8• CGPPER .. CUD INEVURTK ROD DIN YLRrMlY1T < Fx CDROUF 24' WON ` FIKHED MADE AS 0.2 0.4 1141 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 .1 PEGulaD \ VEWfA WA 0,2 0.3 0.5 0`8, O."! - %WONTx Roos WER 10 SIRCKILWJ. MWOS FOR EMT POLE CASE Dim ms TYPICAL POLE BASE DETAIL xar ro scac za ao eo cwnlc war w Frcr R 7 3 _ x 4 � � 9 � � I Ei $$ � .8g �ns 93 LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST LANDSCAPE CODE SUMMARY iwmr.nur.d.�rnNr RW rwlm�ww�w - G- i r � l � LANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND �E TRDD PRDP'asm slwa sHRUa Ra EVERtlIFFN PREwoS£P TREE d[. gDNMURAL CPASS o ` RED mWUV W, aRSL PFREIeaz PRDRD9m - Gl10UgEVYYR _ © E-Im S TREE 8� �. Evnnxc EvPiuffRl rRCE ua elc eHRum g 1 ��I 1 r I 'lE[a 5200 .t. C ADPRIR - 299x 3O .1M9-29Ra RevisEans: Mark Date By LANDSCAPE NOTES ,. LacawG Aro PROrecn"c ALL un0ulmaxo urzmES, PNDR ro Ewarvc. rs THe 1��sRm av na: P— TO mNrRAnGR, z. PRroR ro INS'TALIAIIEA, THE uwosc+�wE wHmACTOR s A. - HE3 P A sH1ae AND r2mM".00vrR NEPS (pyv+P ArD NEY!) 10 0E ANIaHm wld A WMaIUN 2 CLF1W SRRE00m HMDMGOa YULE". _ 5 H wALMI N,D PWM& 6 S To 9E T° To uN av w 16 w AND MFrRIm wNN 06) I � E,61Nr� I I l 9! WSS Ov ORWNIE IUIEPLL, "VEER RN/IEO am5 wnH .� I... {2s7^TM I soa I 7 DYP1N Di -HE a MINI NUDYErS I I I -.11 G Gt/V,11NZ XP(E$ TO BE OIiG R WNiNVM DF mCl d pJY {5 I I wiaM Wo D -12 HR K" TNW, THE -E w THE {9)t I I A 9 aE B6M SN" R ME AMEND DA:liF1LL (lo)cR s o ° >' 6 11 0 I J wrm raP9aw w. Enalru Mm r Wnw a L . - � z AC l au » altW P1aPR :P wa"ONC so rw ar RoOr auL ooES xm a: d W- (tzl '> � I 1) f r. ionw.. u m eE av n� rs raPw¢ rs GR a)RA \ l9 (, 4wa J6 pHC I I I RART aAa " DWl DE. Rawa's N ZR M RRO e GW M PRDwsrP nAN1°IO wRrns To DE ; F $ 1 I M.10 MYD AAFA TO �LY•tl RM P ro REMOVE � RS� �wq I Roos M,D DmPoS —0ER Iw1N , wfHe �N o"NEIw - rS (zN zaYw, Ay �, t y rys I I f °NOR ro Rur sa m. 0 ra)LP 'ZDf 6 ,0 1kP I I� ". RErES I Mtl ri ifE A'REArlla DED�TNBUfeD N d Tl so (3)PA I 1 +a scD rO eE ttWEPID Tilm41 (cm Esss nrx z. HoLws k- J ,JPR PR4 10 ARwaxc Dn 9n lPO IMM[DNTELY. PEL1EO 12). k. Nol 1NaNGIANL Mml WE HOUR aF \1 R - � - _ I .�I I,. ENTNC>:s , er n, a 7007 ° � , I� I 12. 111 PA K NW,DS To BE AP.. w 6' wIIH J )ro cESV, rRMaLE xP Pr TG BE MSTAUEO w Po"raRwWEE Q - "MTN MN4 2eo.t THE 'eMERNJM, RINIEW,D PER URSERY AEDF N ,npT 1 {S _ •1 _ _ - STOCK: NID THE W STW,o.AOS aE M AMEaKSx ; i N THE L NrMW GE DRYRTMFN. I= IRRi - DY AN MvaM C iN[ vA C�paRACAR SX4tCUMA'R[C A11 PWA§ STfALE (2919 MIX1NI PROSPECT Y �,TrH WSTNlFM faR D,a vuu ME.R TARN DAIE W`EfPIARE£ 33 BY THE pIr1ER, ALL RNIIg 51'AlL BE AEf2 AND AT A 15 I , " YGDIm9 RATE Di CRO,mT A� rxE fNP P AIE wr Ea' el� i�aR Ac a cPPC. M RAND RD c Q t ��• �. '�� - ,a urc vLWfr 11NT 5 DE1EOWiEO oVD, a An ERRiNelrr LMHURST RD eRa;,cM aR ome� ,New,- n'v�oo°YDrmus MOUNT PROSPECT, it CRdMTN 54Wi °[ RN+1M3a RY lwE LWDSGWE , MS \ \ - ,G tANrRKTpR MTI TF Cosr aT mE NEWIOENEM 9JM \ \ S'zS""' Tom. �... riGLEVm w THE Bd' OR vRDVagra TH SHEET 711{f (� ,T. S2 AIA flrFRSA[fN AHD EECr1Ppu i L SOD 4 SW \ �mznE Mm wamR AwR nRYPPR '& MPET wYmlAmrt�EY.w 11,E NdY S, 1a11R4 AND PLAN LANDSCAPE , 1 _ y Sao ' +�` \ C'x 124- �` f '1 '3.'- - L: 7f DIME EwnON 07,1 REwSION _ 2845 Job No. LIMA. $iME 2815 Data : MAY 11 Po� )uA i 9s'sesm43i'rimg0LADc or 1xDCEm m Aro We AND /aR FLOOR. PLAN - Store #2845 Scale: 3/32 " =1' -0" Mount Prospect, IL May 12, 2011 :imp ChipmanDo I 1550N L ecture lnc, I651i N. Ncrtt��nori HlPNway, SUiir. 400 lark .294.6 'llilnnFr 41 ' 6 ©048 -f4dJ T 5.34d.bltld F ppi.� }p,4Y48 Andrade, Consuelo From: Girish J. Zaveri [ Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:26 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject'. Case No. PZ -13 -11 ,I o, Planning and Zoning Commission 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 I live adjacent to the subject property, on north side. nor. VILLA G,, F k rY I strongly object to having a restaurant and especially one with a drive through facility JUN 15 2011 next to my home because it will disrupt my family's lifestyle. The smell from the kitchen exhaust, the noise from the restaurant, any added lighting vfflage and the constant traffic pattern will be detrimental to my peaceful family life. col']ri It",'Y j3d ;U The adjacent side of my house contains my master bedroom windows, my garage, and backyard. The act of opening our windows, utilizing our backyard and patio, and simply coming to and from home will become inconvenient and clouded by the restaurant's presence. The location of the restaurant raises strong concerns related to my family's safety, privacy, and the reduction of my property's value. I have lived at the current address for several years and have paid huge property taxes in order to enjoy my beautiful neighborhood and valuable home. Please deny the request by the petitioner. 1002 N. Meadow Ln. Mount Prospect, 1160056 This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http: / /www.messagelabs.com /email •r Lase loo: PZ -13 -11 Pt-N-4 03 -27 -307- 024 -0000 ale "r` XRg : MY 2a, 2011 at 7;30 P^ Subiect: Chick - €il -A restaurant with a drive- through facility and additional exceptions to standard village guidelines. Summary of Reauested Actions of the Case: Conditional Use approval for a drive - through and dine- in establishrnent in the 84 zoning district. Variations for reduction in foundation planting requirements (14.2307), reduction in 10' parking setback along north & south property lines (14.2217), additional menu board /ordering station (7.325C), & additional building gall sign (7.305B). Qbiections: We, the following residents, believe that granting Chicle -fil -A additional exceptions to establish their restaurant will be detrimental to our neighborhood- A drive - through facility will bring nuisance due to excessive traffic and noise. Reduction in the 10' parking setback brings traffic closer to our neighborhood. Additional signs, lighting, and reduction in foundation planting will further cast a shadow over our nice, quiet, peaceful, and comfortable community. In addition, this will impact negatively on all our property values. We strongly urge the Mt. Prospect Planning and Zoning Commission to DENY the request. P.tsf �. ZP�V (10 2- ),/. mP- 0 -0(6 Name Address _ Signature 2: y 0 � m' I ' to �� t \ Cfi G c M , L-3 ^ Name Address .Signatui c •Z 3: an a Cc /a©/ Al e r�. zn Name Address Sign t e 4: � &&a- Name 5: 1 0, 9 t �- ` 5; � Name Address Signature Address Signature ORDINANCE NO. ______ AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE-THROUGH LANES) AND VARIATIONS (PARKING LOT SETBACK AND FOUNDATION LANDSCAPING) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 950 NORTH ELMHURST ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Chick-fil-A, Inc. (Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Conditional Use to operate a drive-through restaurant and Certain Variations (parking lot setbacks and foundation landscaping) for property located at 950 North Elmhurst Road and legally described as: Lot 1 in Rand-Elmhurst Subdivision being a Subdivision of part of the East ½ of the Southwest ¼ of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in the Village of Mount Prospect, according to the Plat thereof recorded December 18, 1968 as Document 20707569, in Cook County, Illinois. Property Index Number:03-27-307-024-0000; and WHEREAS, the “Petitioner” seeks (1) a Conditional Use to operate a restaurant with drive-through lanes, (2) a Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) and six inches (6”) along the north property line and from ten feet (10’) to three feet (3’) and eight inches (8”) along the south property line and (3) a Variation to reduce the foundation landscaping from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) and eleven inches (11”) wide along the north building elevation, eight feet (8’) wide along the east building elevation and zero feet (0’) along the south building elevation as shown on the site plan, a copy which is attached and made a part of as Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use and Variations being the subject th of PZ-13-11 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28 day of July, 2011, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on th the 8 day of June, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect in support of the request being the subject of PZ-13-11; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the requests and have determined that the requests meet the standards of the Village and that the granting of (1) a Conditional Use to operate a restaurant with drive-through lanes, (2) a Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) and six inches (6”) along the north property line and from ten feet (10’) to three feet (3’) and eight inches (8”) along the south property line and (3) a Variation to reduce the foundation landscaping from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) and eleven inches (11”) wide along the north building elevation, eight feet (8’) wide along the east building elevation and zero feet (0’) along the south building elevation as shown on the site plan, attached as Exhibit “A,” would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant (1) a Conditional Use to operate a restaurant with drive-through lanes, (2) a Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) and six inches (6”) along the north property line and from ten feet (10’) to three feet (3’) and eight inches (8”) along the south property line and (3) a Variation to reduce the Page 2/2 PZ-13-11 foundation landscaping from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) and eleven inches (11”) wide along the north building elevation, eight feet (8’) wide along the east building elevation and zero feet (0’) along the south building elevation as shown on the site plan, a copy which is attached and made a part of as Exhibit “A.” SECTION THREE: Approval of the Conditional Use and Variations is subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Woolpert, Inc. dated May 11, 2011; and 2. Development of the building in conformance with the elevations prepared by Chipman Design Architecture, Inc. dated April 27, 2011; and 3. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by Woolpert, Inc. dated May 11, 2011, but revised to comply with Village Code; and 4. The lane located south of the pickup window lane remains as a pass-through lane; and 5. Submittal of a photometric (lighting) plan and fixture cut sheets that indicate the site will comply with Village Code requirements; and 6. Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy, the Petitioner shall complete a Plat of Easements, which addresses staff’s review comments on utility and access easements; and 7. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building and other Village Codes and regulations including signage; and 8. The installation of tall evergreen shrubs along the north property line; and 9. The installation of a six foot (6’) tall privacy fence along the north property line. SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 2011. ______________________________________ Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk 2 3 z s 'L S .§ � s s ^g3 �no SSA 9§ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: mra�: w � x M+e- cx,.e. xmtcximc er nwr « nc " t � x xw mxovA�`turi�i w �v. roxrinr � wxm! AwoE io Ix�L p MI � T lMY IELWGF� KKWR t0. txw q pppx[xt rxgtlY, x OGIX tVprtt, Vhlllti fgl(OA GxP(!t gfErvW T'M 4fWl.0 anx. q m um twa ta®xwr v tm a�mce ., .sx xo wra a wsm .awu - ow wo i� wuwxiaxa .s w`�' ru .� xo�wocm m xoaa� Aix v x « u®xm gxmrt uowxm swesxx. CEO � AW Wf1ER S ocrzcrAEVC rrnxwc S1TE KEY NOTES wo. oExa p" Q srcv pat Q 'op Wr E-- snv Qi ro� cxosww stfx Q Acassieu aeFwxc s�cn O8 PHNRp ICCESSBLf PMWrvC 8rW1a O STOP 8tR Oi oLOEtitnwt P+ObSglli (y' SrewmJ O 9oExxx (x c 4cRm O pxECfgxry WxW 50 -xu tx m 1� xtru BMno K GJtOR' plUExWG SrArpx 0 xOnvgm Srx I® OxFCrgtwl SCn Ix CLEMIJME &K IS pN�O:Mi YAiNC 0.9Fn 18 ALUNARIY HxIprWL 1© FtIG PoIE 1� PEFlISC ENCLpSURE aYVHC st'nLE iry FElT Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JULY 29, 2011 SUBJECT: PZ -15 -11 1 1500 W. CENTRAL RD. I CONDITIONAL USE (LIGHTED FOOTBALLISOCCER FIELDS & LIGHTED DRIVING RANGE) AND VARIATIONS (BUILDING SETBACK & HEIGHT OF LIGHT STANDARDS) The Petitioner proposes to construct a driving range over the existing detention pond and install light standards on the existing football/soccer fields and the new driving range. The overall recreational plan for Melas Park, as approved by the Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Park District, and the Arlington Heights Park District on April 16, 1991, allows for the lighted athletic fields and a golf driving range. The Village Zoning Ordinance requires Conditional Use approval for the proposed light standards. The Petitioner also seeks a Variation to decrease the required building setback for a driving range control building. The Petitioner indicates the control building would be setback four (4) feet from the west property line, when the Village Code requires a fifteen (15) foot building setback. Finally, the Petitioner seeks a Variation to increase the height of the light standards from thirty (30) feet up to seventy (70) feet. Six (6) light standards would be located to light the existing football/soccer fields and six (6) would be located to light the new driving range. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the requests on Thursday, July 28, 2011, and by a vote of 6 -1, recommended _approval of 1) a Conditional Use to allow lighted football/soccer fields and a lighted driving range. By a vote of 7 -0, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of 2) a Variation to increase the height of light standards from thirty (30) feet to seventy (70) feet, and 3) a Variation to reduce the building setbacks from fifteen (15) feet to four (4) feet along the west property line, subject to the following conditions: • The primary lights are turned off at 9 pm. • The secondary lights are turned off at 9:30 pm. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their August 16, 2011 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. .� William J. Clooney, Jr., I lCP h:lplanVpL�nning &zoning commlp&z 2011Lncj mcmoslyz -]5- I 1 1500 w. cxatral roed(cu & vers).dacz MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -15 -11 Hearing Date: July 28, 2011 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1500 W. Central Road (Melas :Park) PETITIONER: Louis Ennesser, Mt. Prospect Park District PUBLICATION DATE: June 8, 2011 PIN NUMBERS: 03 -33 -300 -077, -076, -056, & 03- 33- 408 -004 REQUESTS: 1) Conditional Use for a lighted driving range and lighted football/soccer fields 2) Variation to decrease the required building setbacks 3) Variation to increase the height of light standard MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Rogers, Chair William Beattie Joseph Donnelly Leo FIoros Theo Foggy Ronald Roberts Keith Youngquist MEMBER ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Consuelo Andrade, Development Review Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Lou Ennesser, Walt Cook, Gary Gilmer, Tom Diltz, Robert Blaisdell, Jim Solazzo, Steve Burger, Lynn Berry, Nancy Daly, Michaele Skowron, Nancy Weinand, Monica Cantu, Jack Smorczewski, Peter Konar, Rick Kaempfer, Sonja Nilsen Chairman Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:33p.m. Mr. Floros made a motion, seconded by Mr. Donnelly to approve the minutes of the May 26, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting; the minutes were approved 5 -0 with Mr. Roberts and Mr. Foggy abstaining. Chairman Rogers explained that the June 23, 2011 Planning & Zoning Meeting was continued to the July 28, 2011 meeting because Village Hall lost power due to a confirmed tornado that struck the Village. Chairman Rogers expressed his appreciation and gratitude towards the public servants of the community for their efforts with cleaning up the Village after the storm. After hearing two (2) previous cases, Chairman Rogers introduced Case PZ- 15 -11, 1500 W. Central Road, at 8:28 p.m. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner is requesting Conditional Use approval for a lighted driving range and football/soccer fields, and Variations to decrease the building setbacks and increase the height of light standards. Ms. Andrade said the Subject Property is located on the north side of Central Road, between Busse Road and Kenilworth Avenue, and contains a park with related improvements. The specific project area is located on the east half of the park, and contains a detention basin and football and soccer fields. The Subject Property is zoned CR Conservation Recreation and is bordered by the RA Single Family Residential district to the east, 11 Limited Industrial to the west, CR Conservation Recreation and R1 Single Family Residential to the south, and industrial uses in Arlington Heights to the north. The Subject Property is owned by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page I of 9 District (MWRD), but is leased to the Village of Mount Prospect, who subsequently leases the land to the Mount Prospect and Arlington Heights Park Districts. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner proposed to construct a driving range over the existing detention pond and install light standards on the existing football/soccer fields and the new driving range. The overall recreational plan for McIas Park, as approved by the Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Park District, and the Arlington Heights Park District on April 16, 1991, allowed for the lighted athletic fields and a golf .driving range. The Village Zoning Ordinance requires Conditional Use approval for the proposed light standards. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner's site plan indicated the driving range would include six (6) target greens and a new control building located along the west property line. The building would be setback four (4) feet from the west property line, when Village Code requires a fifteen (15) foot building setback. The Petitioner was seeking a Variation to allow a four (4) foot setback along the west property line. Ms. Andrade stated per the Petitioner's application, the control building would distribute golf balls and club rentals. In addition, the building would be used for storage of equipment and supplies necessary to maintain the driving range. Ms. Andrade said six (6) light standards would be located to light the existing football/soccer fields and six (6) light standards would be located around the driving range. The light standards would measure seventy (70) feet tall, which exceed the Village Code's maximum thirty (30) foot height limitation. The Petitioner was "seeking a Variation to increase the height of the light standards from thirty (30) feet to seventy (70) feet. Per the Petitioner, the light standards would be turned off no later than 10:30 p.m. The Petitioner noted that the lights would be programmed to turn on and off via remote control. Ms. Andrade showed a slide that represented a recreational facility with light standards and illustrated the extent of how much light would spill out. She referenced a picture that illustrated the light standards would have minimal illumination in the opposite direction from the where the lights would be directed. Ms. Andrade showed images that illustrated the front and side views of the proposed light standards. The light standards would include poles with four (4), five (5), and six (6) luminaries and would comply with the Village Code requirement of full cutoff design. Ms. Andrade stated the standards for Conditional Uses are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These findings include: The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; And that adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets are provided. Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner's information demonstrated that lighted athletic fields and a golf driving range have been part of the master plans for Melas Park as referenced in the overall recreational plan that was approved by the Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Park District, and the Arlington Heights Park District in 1991. The proposed lighting has been designed to be full cutoff and would be directed away from the residential properties as much as possible. The proposed lighted football/soccer fields and driving range would be in compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 2 of 9 Ms. Andrade stated the standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The summary of these findings include: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character Ms. Andrade said the Petitioner was seeking a Variation to allow seventy (70) foot light standards and a four (4) foot building setback to the west property line. The additional height would allow the Petitioner to install fewer lights poles, thus minimizing the impact on the adjacent properties. The light standards would be keeping with the character of the park's existing facilities as there are lighted soccer fields with sixty (60) foot light standards. The Village approved a Variation allowing sixty (60) foot light standards in 2003. Ms. Andrade stated based on the findings, Staff recommended that the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the motions listed in the Staff Report. Mr. Foggy asked what would happen with the existing path. Ms. Andrade stated that the existing path would be preserved around the driving range with no protection. Mr. Youngquist questioned if there was a fence proposed. Ms. Andrade answered the proposal did not include a fence along the east property line or path. She stated that the Petitioner could answer the Commissioners' questions in further detail. Mr. Beattie asked what the length was of the light standards for the Arlington Heights ball fields. Ms. Andrade said the Village Board previously approved sixty (60) foot light poles. The proposal for the Subject Case was for seventy (70) foot light poles for both the soccer /football fields and the driving range. Chairman Rogers swore in Lou Ennesser, Director of Parks and Planning for the Mount Prospect Park District. Mr. Ennesser discussed the ownership of Melas Park. The original lease was drafted in 1981 and it identified the park for recreational purposes. Mr. Ennesser stated in the 1980s, the Village of Mount Prospect along with both Park Districts drafted a Master Plan for Melas Park that called for lit ball fields, playgrounds, parking lots, recreational paths, and a driving range. The Master Plan was an exhibit included when the Melas Park lease was extended in 1991. Mr. Ennesser said that the Park District is now in the financial position to add the lights and driving range according the Master Plan. He discussed the history and development of the park and where it stands today. Mr. Ennesser said there are a total of five (5) premium soccer /football fields that serve all age groups at Melas Park. There are two (2) regulation sized fields, one (1) intermediate field, and two (2) smaller fields. Mr. Ennesser stated that the driving range would be built within the detention basin on the northeast corner of the site. The driving range would consist of approximately thirty (30) driving tees with a training area. The golfers would be driving from west to east at target areas throughout the range. It is approximately 300 yards from the tees to the recreational path; the path would not be modified at all. Mr. Ennesser stated that he believed netting would be needed; but a decision has not been made due to the consultant reviewing MWRD's requirements on the site for netting. The drawings that were submitted to the Village were preliminary; nothing has been finalized for the project. Mr. Ennesser discussed the Variation request to the side yard for the control building. He stated that the control building would run along the line that separates the two (2) park districts, but that line is not the property line. He said there is no effect on either side of the line as it is park districts on both sides. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 3 of 9 Mr. Ennesser stated the Park District has proposed to illuminate the two (2) larger fields along with the driving range. The soccer/football fields would have seventy (70) foot light standards on six (6) poles. He said the seventy (70) foot height was chosen because it is the optimum height for light on the fields only. If the lights were lower than seventy (70) feet, then the lights would need to be angled and this would create a glare and spillage from the lights. Mr. Ennesser said anything higher than seventy (70) feet would be a waste. At the driving range, there would be two sixty (60) foot light standards at the tee and then four (4) seventy (70) foot light standards along the range. Mr. Ennesser said that Arlington Heights has sixteen (16) light standards on their side of Melas Park. Mr. Ennesser stated that football would be played in the fall while soccer ,would be played in the spring. The driving range would most likely follow the golf course hours opening in mid -March to April and closing in late November. Mr. Ennesser discussed the hours of operation. The games would be scheduled to end by 9:45 p.m.; this would allow any tied games to finish up by 10:00 p.m. when the eastern facing lights would shut off. The remaining lights would be turned off at 10:30 p.m. after the Park District attendant has secured and closed the site. The driving range would follow the same schedule as the athletic fields. Mr. Beattie asked who would be playing soccer and football until 10.00 p.m. Chairman Rogers swore in Walt Cook from the Mount Prospect Park District, 1000 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Cook said the Mount Prospect Recreation League, Green and White Soccer, and Mount Prospect Football would be utilizing the fields. Mr. Foggy confirmed that the fields would only be used by the clubs and activities mentioned. Chairman Rogers swore in Gary Gilmer, 106 N. Kenilworth, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Gilmer stated that his residence backs up to the athletic fields and his property is located approximately fifty (50) yards from one of the proposed light standards. He understood the Park District's request for the lights, but could not support it due to the impact that it would have on the adjacent neighborhood, the impact on the quality of life, and financial impact on the property values. Mr. Gilmer said the seventy (70) foot light standards would be an eyesore and would alter the character of the neighborhood. He stated the lights would bring in additional traffic, noise, and parking issues to the neighborhood. Mr. Gilmer said that these issues already exist during game days. Mr. Gilmer discussed and highlighted the financial impact that the proposed lights would have on his property and its value. He provided the Planning and Zoning Commission a handout that explained his numbers: the purchase price of his home, the current market value, and the potential decrease due to the lights. Mr. Gilmer referenced an economic impact study of lighting a football field in Arlington, Virginia. Mr. Gilmer believed that the Park District did not provide sufficient information on how the lights would impact the adjacent neighborhood. Chairman Rogers confirmed with Mr. Gilmer that patrons of the park were currently cutting through the properties on the west side of Kenilworth. Mr. Roberts said that living near a park may actually add value to a property. He believed that the Park District should provide evidence how the park impacts the adjacent neighborhood. Mr. Roberts stated that Mr. Gilmer would need to offset any deduction the proposed lights may have on the neighboring properties with the addition in value that park may offer. There was general discussion on the current hours of operation for both sides of Melas Park. Mr. Floros asked Mr. Gilmer if he appeared before the Park District Board. Mr. Gilmer said he has not, the first time he found out about this case was when he received the legal notice and attended the informational meeting Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 4 of 9 with the Park District. Mr. Gilmer stated that the zoning rules arc. the only thing that protects him from the Park District. There was general discussion regarding the zoning rules and the proposed light standards. Mr. Simmons stated a Conditional Use would be required to light any athletic field. The maximum height permitted would be thirty . (30) feet by Village Code. Mr. Simmons stated there are two (2) Variation requests before the Commission. The first was for the proposed height of the light standards of seventy (70) feet and the second is for a building setback related to the driving range control building. Mr. Donnelly confirmed that the Park District could light the path (within levels allowed by Code) around the park without zoning approval. Chairman Rogers said that the Planning and Zoning Commission did receive letters from residents stating that they did not want the lights. Mr. Gilmer stated that twenty -five (25) of twenty -seven (27) residents on North Kenilworth did submit a letter of opposition to the Commission; two (2) neighbors said they did not have enough information. Mr. Beattie asked if there was any discussion amongst the neighbors to request the proposed lights be turned off earlier in the evening. Mr. Gilmer stated that he could not speak for his neighbors, but an earlier time off may change things slightly. Mr. Gilmer reiterated the financial impact the lights could have. There was general discussion regarding the items that were up for zoning approval. It was confirmed by Staff that the proposed case was to Iight the existing fields and the new driving range, the height of the light standards, and the setbacks for the control building at the range. Even though the driving range does not currently exist, it is a permitted use for the Subject Property. There was further discussion regarding the setback for the proposed control building. Chairman Rogers wanted to clarify an earlier point and stated that letters have also been received in support of the driving range and light standards. Mr. Beattie wanted to clarify that many of the letters that were received in opposition of the Subject Case were against the use of the driving range, not for the proposed lights at Melas Park. The driving range is a permitted use and not under the Planning & Zoning Commission's jurisdiction. Mr. Ennesser confirmed that Melas Park closes at 11:00 p.m.; as do all of the Park District's other community parks. He discussed that if the lights were approved, it may alleviate the parking issues since so many events would not be scheduled on Saturday and Sundays only. Mr. Ennesser stated that the Village is working with MWRD on possibly constructing a salt dome at Melas Park; there has been discussion about extending the main road with parking on both sides to the proposed salt dome. Mn Ennesser believed that Mr. Gilmer's numbers on property values were unsubstantiated. He said that he has spoken to realtors who stated that living next to a park is a wash on property values. Mr. Ennesser stated that the proposed lights have been in discussion since 1991 and the Park District is doing the best it can to minimize any adverse affect on the adjacent property owners. He said that the Park District has already made some compromises to the proposed lights by turning them off earlier than what they originally proposed. There was discussion regarding the petition that was submitted in support of the project. Mr. Ennesser confirmed that the petition was in support of the lights at Melas Park and the proposed driving range; it was not exclusive to the driving range only. Mr. Ennesser stated that technology has evolved in regards to light standards and the proposed lights would be even more efficient that those constructed on the Arlington Heights side of Melas Park in 2003. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 5 of 9 Chairman Rogers asked the Petitioner if the Park District could help alleviate the parking of patrons along Kenilworth and cutting to -the park. Mr. Ennesser stated that the Park District could encourage patrons not to park in the adjacent neighborhood, but believed it would be up to the Village for enforcement. Mr. Beattie asked if the Park District considered turning off the lights earlier than 10:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. There was general discussion regarding turning off the proposed lights at different times. Mr. Ennesser said that the Park District would need to meet internally to discuss a potential earlier time to turn off the proposed lights. Mr. Donnelly asked if the Park District's lease has been extended. Mr. Ennesser stated that the salt dome discussion changed the character of the lease. MWRD needed more time to research the salt dome, so the lease has been extended on the Subject Property for just one (l) year. Mr. Donnelly asked what entity would be using the salt dome. Mr. Ennesser said that the Village of Mount Prospect, Village of Arlington Heights, Mount Prospect Park District and Arlington Heights Park District would all share the salt dome. Mr. Floros confirmed with the Petitioner that the Park District lights the fields at Meadows Park-and other facilities in Mount Prospect and Des Plaines. Mr. Ennesser stated that the Park District has been a good neighbor and rarely received any complaints about lights at its other parks. Mr. Gilmer reaffirmed his position that the Park District has not provided any fact based evidence in regards to their zoning requests. Chairman Rogers swore in Tom Diltz, 120 N. Kenilworth. Mr. Diltz discussed how he bought his home because of the park. He stated that the Park District proposed to install a driving range with lights approximately fifteen (15) years ago and it failed. Mr. Diltz said that he sees the lights at the Arlington Heights Park District's fields and was in opposition for lighting the football /soccer fields near his home. He stated that he would be in support if the Park District was interested in lighting the recreational path. Chairman Rogers swore in Robert Blaisdell, 104 N. Kenilworth, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Blaisdell stated that the adjacent neighborhood does receive a lot of traffic for the park, but his major concern was with the additional noise that would be added into the evening. He said proposed lights would affect the overall neighborhood character. Mr. Blaisdell believed the request for doubling the height Variance was drastic. Mr. Beattie asked Mr. Blaisdell if his concern was the lights in general or the height of the lights. Mr. Blaisdell stated that he was against the entire proposal, but could comae to more of an agreement if the lights were turned off earlier. Chairman Rogers swore in Jim Solazzo, 10 N. Kenilworth, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Solazzo stated that by having football/soccer games in the evening would not alleviate parking due to evening events at the Arlington Height Park District's fields. He said a golf range was not needed at the Subject Property. Chairman Rogers swore in Steve Burger, 116 N. Kenilworth, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Burger said that Melas Park is no longer a park; it is now classified by the Park District as an athletic complex. He stated that since the Park District made improvements on the athletic fields, he believed there were less games being played and more games could be scheduled during the daytime hours. Mr. Burger stated his overall objection to the lights because it would affect the adjacent neighborhood. Chairman Rogers swore in Lynn Berry, 209 E. Hiawatha, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Berry said she is an avid golfer and believed there are several other driving ranges and golf courses in the area. She discussed how the community has changed and evolved over several years. Ms. Berry believed it would be in the best interest of the Park District to review and update its Master Plan to 2011 before having the Village Board vote on the proposed zoning items. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 PIanning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 6 of 9 Chairman Rogers swore in Nancy Daly, 121 N. Kenilworth, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Daly said her concerns were with cars being parked on Kenilworth in the evening by those who are utilizing the football /soccer fields at Melas Park. She objected to the lights and believed the additional traffic in the evening would create a safety hazard on Kenilworth. Chairman Rogers swore in Michaele Skowron, 1404 W. Busse Ave., Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Skowron stated she understood the Park District's request to utilize Melas Park to its full capabilities. She said more activity at the park creates more noise to spill over into the adjacent neighborhoods. Ms. Skowron stated she understood that light would not glare or spill into the residential yards; she said neighbors would still see the light projected on the proposed fields. Ms. Skowron said the Planning and Zoning Commission could create a condition on when the lights could be turned off by. She stated that when the Arlington Heights Park District went before the Zoning Board for its lighted ball fields, their argument was that their lights were next to commercial properties, not residential. Chairman Rogers swore in Nancy Weinand, 118 N. Kenilworth, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms.. Weinand stated that the proposed lights would change the character of the neighborhood. She said that residents of Mount Prospect could not use a majority of the park since it is fenced in and locked. Ms. Weinand discussed the enforcement of parking during the Fourth of July. She also questioned why the Park District did not discuss the costs of the proposed project and thought the Park District proposed earlier hours for the lights. Chairman Rogers swore in Monica Cantu, 218 N. Russel St., Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Cantu stated that she was involved with the youth travel soccer program and discussed the need for the proposed lights. She said the Park District's facilities .were limited and she was concerned if the lights were not approved, many of the programs could be eliminated. Chairman Rogers swore in Jack Smorczewski, 15 N. Kenilworth, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Smorczewski questioned the zoning process. Chairman Rogers explained that the public hearing was the first step in the process. The Petitioner would need to come back before the Village Board for a final vote on the zoning requests. Chairman Rogers swore in Peter Konar, 2008 Scott Terrace, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Konar stated that he coached the Mount Prospect soccer league and Green and White. He stated that the proposed lights would allow more time for instruction with the kids, especially during the fall hours. He said most of the games are scheduled for Saturdays and Sundays. Chairman Rogers confirmed with Mr. Konar that he is in favor of the lights. Chairman Rogers swore in Rick Kaempfer, 303 N. Ehnhurst Ave, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Kaempfer stated he was also involved with the youth soccer programs and believed there were hardships on the teams due to the lack of facilities and loss of daylight in the fall. He stated there were many kids in the leagues and that there are constant scheduling conflicts. He understood and believed the adjacent neighbors had concerns, but he said there are concerns from the other side as well. Chairman Rogers swore in Sonja Nilsen, 20 S. Elm St., Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Nilsen said she was in support of the proposed lights. She stated that with school starting in the fall and the loss of sunlight, it was hard to find time for teams to practice. She stated it was kind of a waste just to use the park between school hours and dusk. She stated that the lights would allow for more use of the park and would be beneficial for the kids. She believed the Park District was doing everything it could to reduce the impact on the adjacent neighbors. Ms. Weinand stated that she was told by the Park District that the football /soccer fields would be only used for games. She wasn't sure that the fields would be able to be used for practices. Mr. Cook said the Park District was deficient in the amount of acreage that it should have in order to adequately serve the community population. He stated the plans for the driving range were only preliminary because they cannot build a range without receiving approval for lights. Mr. Cook said the Park District was trying to be a Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 7 of 9 good neighbor, but there is a demand of activities for 1,500 to 1,700 children. He stated there needs to be a balance between the Park District and the adjacent neighbors. Mr. Beattie was concerned that there would be adult leagues renting the football/soccer fields and utilizing those facilities during the later hours, not the kids who are involved with the Park District. Mr. -Cook stated -that the Park District needs more areas for practice and the Melas Park fields would be utilized. He said as long as he is with the Park District, adult leagues would not be using the Melas Park fields; they were there for the community. Mr. Donnelly asked if Mr. Cook would agree to conditions being placed on the lights for practices only. Mr. Cook stated that he is.open to do anything for the lighting. Mr. Donnelly believed the major noise was for the games, not for the practices. . There was additional discussion regarding the issue of noise and parking. Mr. Roberts stated that the residents along Kenilworth may want to work with the Village regarding parking restrictions. There was additional discussion regarding the Planning & Zoning Commission's ability to place restrictions on the hours of operation for the proposed Iights- Chairman Rogers said that the Commission does have the rights to place conditions on a Variation. He believed by placing time limits on the proposed lights would make the case less objectionable for the adjacent neighbors. Chairman Rogers swore in Bryan Bolin, Musco Sports Lighting, 1150 Powis Road, West Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Foggy asked Mr. Bolin to discuss the grading of the proposed seventy (70) foot light standards. Mr. Bolin stated that all of the football/soccer light standards are seventy (70) feet tall on level grade. He discussed the need for the seventy (70) foot light standards versus thirty (30) foot light standards. Mr. Bolin said the pole and mounting height does vary on the proposed drivingrange due to the changes in elevation. Chairman Rogers confirmed with Mr. Bolin that there would be zero (0) spillover on the adjacent properties. Mr. Bolin stated the amount of light at the adjacent properties would be 0.19 foot candles when Village Code allows for up to 0.5 foot candles. Mr. Simmons confirmed that the proposed light fixtures based on the photometric plan will meet Village Code Mr. Bolin discussed the differences in lighting the football/soccer fields and the driving range. Chairman Rogers asked if there was anyone else in the audience to address this case. Hearing none, he closed the public portion of the case at 10:32 p.m. and brought the discussion back to the board. There was general discussion regarding the zoning requests. Mr. Youngquist clarified that that the Ianguage in the motion should include lighted driving range along with lighted football and soccer fields. Mr. Simmons stated the Planning & Zoning Commission could not restrict the use of the fields (practice versus games) as these activities are permitted by right based on the underlying zoning for the property. Chairman Rogers confirmed with Staff that the Commission .could only place a condition on the time that the lights would need to be .turned off by. Mr. Simmons said the Park District already has approval for the land use; the zoning requests were for the proposed lights and their height, along with the setbacks for the control building. There was additional discussion regarding the Planning & Commission's jurisdiction in regards to the zoning requests. Mr. Simmons confirmed that the Village Board's decision was final for the Subject Case. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Foggy to approve a Conditional Use to allow lighted football/soccer fields and a lighted driving range, subject to the following conditions of approval: a. The primary light standards are turned off at 9:00 p.m. b. The secondary light standards are turned off at 9:30 p.m. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Donnelly, Fioros, Foggy, Youngquist, Rogers NAYS: Roberts Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 8 of 9 Motion was approved 6 -1. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Beattie to approve a Variation to increase the height of light standards from thirty (30) feet to seventy (70) feet. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Donnelly, Floros, Foggy, Roberts, Youngquist, Rogers NAYS: None Motion was approved 7 -0. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Foggy to approve a Variation to reduce the building setbacks from fifteen (15) feet to four (4) feet along the west property line. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Beattie, Donnelly, Floros, Foggy, Roberts, Youngquist, Rogers NAYS: None Motion was approved 7 -0. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. After hearing one (1) additional case, Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Foggy to adjourn at 11:15 p.m. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Ryan Kast, Community Development Administrative Assistant Richard Rogers, Chair PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting July 28, 2011 Page 9 of 9 Village of Mount Prospect M Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -15 -11 LOCATION: 1500 W. Central Road (Mclas Park) PETITIONER: Louis Ennesser, Mt. Prospect Park District OWNER: Metropolitan Water Reclamation District'L PARCEL #: 03 -33 -300 -077,- 075, -056, & 03 -33- 408 -004 VILLAGE OF M1 PROSPECT LOT SIZE: 37.81 acres ZONING: CR Conservation Recreation LAND USE: Park (Melas Park) REQUEST: 1) Conditional Use for a Iighted driving range and football /soccer fields 2) Variation to decrease the required building setbacks 3) Variation to increase the height of light standard LOCATION MAP Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM i FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER JUNE 6, 2011 JUNE 23, 2011 T PZ -15 -11 / 1500 W. CENTRAL RD. / CONDITIONAL USE (LIGHTED DRIVING RANGE & FOOTBALL /SOCCER FIELDS) & VARIATIONS (BUILDING SETBACK & 70' LIGHT POLES) A public hearing has been scheduled for the June 23, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by the Mount Prospect Park District (the "Petitioner ") regarding the property located at 1500 W. Central Road, commonly known as Mclas Park, (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has requested Conditional Use approval for a lighted driving range and football /soccer fields, and Variations to decrease the building setbacks and increase the height of light standards. The P &Z hearing was properly noticed in the June 8, 2011 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the north side of Central Road, between Busse Road and Kenilworth Avenue, and contains a park with related improvements. The specific project area is located on the east half of the park, just north of the existing football/soccer fields. The Subject Property is zoned CR Conservation Recreation and is bordered by the RA Single Family Residential district to the east, I1 Limited Industrial to the west, CR Conservation Recreation and R1 Single Family Residential to the south, and industrial uses in Arlington Heights to,the north. The Subject Property is owned by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD), but is leased to the Village of Mount Prospect, who subsequently leases the land to the Mount Prospect and Arlington Heights Park Districts. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner proposes to construct a driving range over the existing detention pond and install light standards on the existing football /soccer fields and the new driving range. The overall recreational .plan for Melas Park, as approved by the Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Park District, and the Arlington Heights Park District on April 16, 1991, allows for. the lighted athletic fields and a golf driving range. The Village Zoning Ordinance requires Conditional Use approval for the proposed lighted driving range and football /soccer fields. PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting June 23, 2011 GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE Page 3 Setbacks The proposed driving range would be located approximately thirty five (35) feet from the west property line, which would comply with the Zoning Ordinance minimum ten (10) foot interior side yard setback requirement. The Petitioner's site plan indicates the driving range would include six (6) target greens and a new control building located along the west property line. The Petitioner indicates the building would be setback four (4) feet from the west property line, when the Village Code requires a fifteen (15) foot building setback. The Petitioner seeks a Variation to reduce the building setback from fifteen (15) feet to four (4) feet along the west property line. Approximately ten (10) parking spaces would be lost with the construction of the control building. The Petitioner notes in the attached application that the construction of additional parking is being discussed as part of the proposed salt storage facility. As shown, six (6) light standards would be located to light the existing football /soccer fields and six (6) would be located around the driving range. The lights standards would measure seventy (70) feet tall, which exceed the Village Code's maximum thirty (3 0) foot height Iimitation. The Petitioner seeks a Variation to increase the height of the light standards from thirty (30) feet to seventy (70) feet. Per the Petitioner's application, the light standards would be turned on half an hour before dusk or as light conditions require. The lights would be turned off no later than 11:00 p.m. The Petitioner notes that the lights will be programmed to turn on and off via remote control. Lighting Plan — The Petitioner submitted a photometric plan that indicates the proposed illumination levels. As shown, the photometric plan indicates light levels that comply with the Village Code limitations on lighting. The light levels at the east property Iine are shown as .l foot - candles, with complies with the Code's maximum .l foot candles permitted at a property line abutting a residential property. The proposed illumination will also comply with the maximum forty (40) foot- candles average illumination level permitted for outdoor sports lighting. As shown, the average illumination levels would be thirty (30) foot - candles for the football /soccer fields and twenty one (21) foot - candles for the driving range. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Land Use Map designates the Subject Property as Open Space. The Petitioner's proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation. CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203 Y.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: • The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and • Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The Petitioner's information demonstrates that lighted athletic fields and a golf driving range have been part of the master plans for Melas Park as referenced in the overall recreational plan that was approved by the Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Park District, and the Arlington Heights Park District in 1991. The proposed PZ -15 -11 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting June 23, 2011 Page 4 lighting has been designed to be full cutoff and will be directed away from the residential properties as much as possible. The proposed lighted football /soccer fields and driving range would be in compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner seeks a Variation to allow seventy (70) foot light standards and a four (4) foot building setback to the west property line. The additional height would allow the Petitioner to install fewer lights poles, thus minimizing the impact on the adjacent properties. The light standards would be keeping with the character of the park's existing facilities as there are Iighted soccer field with sixty (60) foot light standards. The Village approved a Variation allowing sixty (60) foot light standards in 2003. Per the Petitioner's application, the building would be used as the driving range control building. Golf balls and club rental will be distributed to range users at the building. In addition, the building would be used for storage of equipment and supplies necessary to maintain the driving range. The proposed building location was selected because of its proximity to the existing parking lot. The Variation for the taller light standards and building setbacks meet the Variation standards and would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood, utility provision or public streets. RECOMMENDATION Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motions: "To approve: 1) A Conditional Use to allow lighted football/soccer fields and a driving range; 2) A Variation to increase the height of light standards from thirty (30) feet to seventy (70) feet; 3) A Variation to reduce the building setbacks from fifteen (15) feet to four (4) feet along the west property line. The Village Board's decision is final for the motions above. i concur: William J. ooney, AICP, Director of Community Development & H:WLAMplan dng & Zoning C13MMp&22o111S1aff RCpmt.\PZ -15.13 141x7 W, CMn -t lid - McWs Puk {CIS - LigbtM Driving Range, VAR- Bldg, S Vbacks Height orr1%tu=1 -dccx VILLAGE OF MOT NT PROSPECT x '"' ` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEr z &RTMENT — Planning Division 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone $47.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval z Case Number P&Z Development NanWAddress m O Date of Submission Hearing Date M/ WY G 1 1 z 1i n c z Addresses) (Street Number, Street) 1400 Telephone (day) O Site Area (Acres) 37.81 Property Zoning Total Building Sy. Ft. (Site) C Corporation Setbacks: i Mt. Prospect Park District 847 --255 -5380 Front PB- -1681' CRS— 750' RS PB -245' — Sid" Bast PB --950' Side We PB -15' 1 84:7 25 5 !4--38- Buil ' Hei Lot Coverage ( %) Number of Parking Spaces jor C 0 Adjacent Land Uses: Email I I ingi- North Saud Railroad/ institutional/ 1 tji Resi-den j L— East Residential west Industrial T 9 Tex I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s) 3- 33300 -056 0 3 -33 -408 -004 Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) Lot "G" and "H" in Kirch subdivision in the Section 33, TQXnshiP 4 Karfb RAnq 11 P a ct- o f th M/ WY G 1 1 z 1i n c z Name Telephone (day) O Louis J. Ennesser Jr. Corporation Telephone (evening) i Mt. Prospect Park District 847 --255 -5380 Street Address Fax 1000 WeSt Cpntrm Road 84:7 25 5 !4--38- C City State Zip Code Email Mount Prospect IL 60056 lennesser m d o lnterest in Property 9 o Name . Susan Morakalis teiepnone(aay) 312-751-6557 P i Principal 'sistant Attorney Corporation Metropolitan Water Reclamation Telephone (evening) 1 9 District of Greater Chicago 312-751-6557 Street Address Fax: . C 111 East Erie Street. 312 -751 -6598 City State Code Email Chicago XL. [ Zip 60611 susan.morakalis8mwrd.org Developer Name Mt. Prospect Park District Telephone(day) 847 -255 -5380 Address 1000 West Central Road Fax 847 -255 -1438 6 Email lenne @mppd.org Attorney Name N/A Telephone (day) Address Fax Email Surveyor C Name Daniel Creaney Company Telephone(day} AA7 -480 -5757 Address 450 Skokie Boulevard Fax 847- 480 -7209 Suite 105 Emaildcrean ey@dreaneyco.com - Engineer Name Same as Developer Telephone (day) Address Fax e � Email Architect Name Same as Developer Telephone (day): Address Fax Email Landscape Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax Email Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.mountprospect.org Phone 847.918.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Q114Jw LW.L "1C Llit -L c Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provide he and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of lsnowl e. Applicant Date If applicant is not rty owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner See Attachment NO. 2 Date Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.mountprospect.org 3 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Proposed Conditional Use (as list ';n the zoning district) R i f f m e' 0' maxi m l ig ht tandard height (up .) 70 �fo 4 Propose a��ow X instal atio of Describe in Detail the Buildutgs and Activities Proposed and blow the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary) See Attachment N0.1 (Narrative) A W o� Z d Hours of Operation Spring Soccer / Fall Football / Golf D Range Lights on 1/2 hour before dusk or as light conditions require; _ Lights off no later than 11:00 pm Address(es) (Street Number, Street) 1400 West Central Road p Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use 37.81 A w CR 4760 Ran a Control Driving g S te , a Front DRC — 1595` Rear DRC — 277' Side E Side West a ' DRC — 945' DRC — 4' Building Height Lot Coverage ( %) Number of Parking Spaces t 0% -10 Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provide he and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of lsnowl e. Applicant Date If applicant is not rty owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner See Attachment NO. 2 Date Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois www.mountprospect.org 3 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Mt. Prospect Park District www.mppd.org Serving Portions of Ml. Prospect • Doe Plaines • Arl4ngton Helgbls • Elk Grove Village ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES (847)255 -5380 Materials included in the submittal include: Fax (847)255 -1438 April 25, 2011 1000 W. Central Road a Cover letter (15 copies) Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 ' Application for conditional approval including attachments (I 5 copies) Des Plaines, IL 60018 Village of Mount Prospect CENTRAL 50 South Emerson Street COMMUNITY CENTER Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 (847)255 -5380 dated 4 -15 -11 (15 copies) Fax (847)392 -5726 Attn: William Cooney, Director of Community Development 1000 W. Central Road product, referenced and the Melas project including compliance with the Village Mt. Prospect a 60056 Re: Melas Park, 1400 West Central Road RECPLEX (847)640 -l000 Dear Mr. Cooney: Fax (847)364 -2824 420 W Dempster street The Mt. Prospect Park District is pleased to submit the following information to support our ML Prospect, iL 6o056 request for relief from certain Village requirements at the referenced park. LIONS More specifically: RECREATION CENTER (847)632 -9333 " Relief from a 30' maximum Iight standard height (up to 70' proposed) to allow for Fax (847)632 -9325 installation of lights on existing sports fields and on a future Driving Range. 411 S. Maple Street ` Relief from a 30' minimum side yard setback (4' proposed) to allow for the future Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 placement of a Driving Range Control building. FRIENDSHIP PARK CONSERVATORY Materials included in the submittal include: (847)298 -3500 Fax (847)296 -2053 a Cover letter (15 copies) 395 Algonquin Road ' Application for conditional approval including attachments (I 5 copies) Des Plaines, IL 60018 ' Drawing l of 2, Melas Park, existing and future athletic fields and Driving Range lighting plan dated 4- 15 -11, (15 copies) MT. PROSPECT GOLF CLUB ' Drawing 2 of 2, Melas Park, blanket grid (Foot - candles at 30' o.c. With All Lights On), (847)259 -4200 dated 4 -15 -11 (15 copies) Fax (847)632 -9334 ■ Light manufacturers packet including, but not limited to, information on the company, 6005ee -Gwen product, referenced and the Melas project including compliance with the Village Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 lighting ordinance, light pole elevations, and detailed lighting information for all lit areas. (15 copies) GOLF COURSE GARAGE Plat of survey (1 copy) (847)632 -9330 Application fee waiver (1 copy) Fax (847)342 -9113 Compact disc with required information (I copy) 600 See -Gwen ML Prospect, IL 60056 LIONS GARAGE (847)632 -9320 Fax (847)255 -8349 431 S. Maple Street Mt, Prospect, IL 60056 Please contact me if you have any questions or comments. Very truly yours, MT. PROSPECT PARK D1ST1R1CT , R.L.A. Director of Parks and Planning LE, /Jp Cc w /encl: Walter Cook, Mt. Prospect Park District, Chief Executive Officer Jim Jarog, Mt. Prospect Park District Building Department Manager, Bryan Bolin, Musco Lighting Mt. Prospect Park District &nmgPori= of Mt. ft pert + Dw Plames • Arlington Heigho • Edr Grw tgllage ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES (847)255 -5380 Fax (847)255 -1438 1000W Central Road Mt Prospect, IL 60056 CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTER (847)255 -5380 Fax (847)392 -5726 1000 W. Central Road ML Prospect, IL 60056 RECPLEX (847)64m000 Fax (847)364 -2824 420 W. Dempster Street ML Prospect, IL 60056 LIONS RECREATION CENTER (847)632-9333 Fax (847)632 -9325 411 S. Maple Street Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 FRIENDSHIP PARK CONSERVATORY (847)298 -3500 Fax (847)296 -2053 395 Algonquin Road Des Plaines, IL 60018 MT. PROSPECT GOLF CLUB (847)259 -4200 Fax (847)632-9334 600 See -Gwen Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 GOLF COURSE GARAGE (847)632 -9330 Fax (847)342 -9113 600 See -Gwen Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 LIONS GARAGE (847)632 -9320 Fax (847)255 -8349 411 S. Maple Street Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 August 5, 2010 Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 4 Attn: Michael Janonis, Village Manager Re: Zoning Ordinance Fees Dear Mike: The Mt. Prospect Park District formally request ordinance fees associated with the following project: Melas Park Sports Field Lighting 1400 West Central Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Thank you in advance for your consideration of our request. Very truly yours, MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT - � � Walter L. Cook Chief Executive Officer WC/1k Cc: Lou Ennesser, Mt. Prospect Park District www.mppd.org all zoning GO� ��'�� s VILL U ,T ATTACHMENT NO. 1 (NARRATIVE) �.�• ��r��J TO APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE FOR MELAS PA ■ Relief from a 30' maximum light standard height (up to 70' proposed) to allow for installation of lights on existing sports fields and on a future Driving Range. HISTORY Melas Park is presently owned by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) and consists of a total of approximately 68 acres. MWRD leases the east 37.81 acres to the Mt. Prospect Park District (MPPD) through a sub -lease with the Village of Mt. Prospect (VOMP). The following is a brief history of the site: • 1975 - Original lease between MWRD and the Village of Arlington Heights (VOAH) and VOMP a Construction of reservoir o All maintenance responsibility by VOAH and VOMP, alternating years. • 1977 - Amendment to 1975 lease • Split maintenance responsibility • VOAH, pumping station • VOMP, all other site improvements for reservoir • Track all costs and split 50150 1981 - Lease to use site 35.68 acres for recreation by VOMP o Amendment agreement with MWRD, VOAH, VOMP, MPPD to allow recreational sport activities, including carnivals, fairs, and fireworks. • 1989 - Lease extension and amendment • Extended 20 years from 06/01/91 to 05/31/11 • Amendment to allow for sale of alcoholic beverages for 5 events. a 1991 -Agreement between VOMP, MPPD and AHPD for recreational use of Melas Park 1991 (04116/91) expires 05131111. o Park Districts can build recreational facilities with MWRD approval. • Park Districts to maintain site. • VOMP to maintain road, parking lots and storm drainage system. • VOAH to maintain pumping station. • VOMP, 5 community events per year • VOMP has right to allow sale of alcoholic beverages at 5 events per year. • VOMP has use of north lot for dumping snow and leaves. • VOAH may construct large diameter storm relief sewer. • VOMP has exclusive use one acre at south west corner for future elevated water storage tank and 20' strip premises for utilities. • VOMP has responsibility for police patrolling. 1996 - Second amendment to lease o MPPD to construct 17 car parking lot at 1326 W. Central Rd. (The Studio) • - 2011 — Lease extension to 2031 is pending. The present arrangement is that the MWRD leases the entire site to the VOMP and the VOAH; the VOMP then sub- Ieases the east portion of the park (detention basin, north mound and south mound including rights to parking) to the MPPD and the west portion of the park (baseball and soccer fields, playground, picnic areas) to the AHPD. The most recent overall recreation plan is detailed in the agreement between the VOMP, the AHPD and the MPPD dated April 16, 1991 and attached as attachment No. IA. This document specifically allows for, among other amenities, "athletic field lighting." In addition, Exhibit `A' to attachment IA indicates a clear intention and agreement by all parties that future athletic fields and a golf driving range are planned and acceptable. AHPD installed athletic field lighting for their baseball fields in 1995. This installation used Musco Lighting for their poles and fixtures, the same manufacturer proposed to be used by the MPPD for the athletic fields and driving range. DESIGN Musco Lighting is an innovator in sports field lighting with recent installations located in northeastern Illinois. See attachment No. 1 B. The lighting design of both the athletic fields and driving range are in compliance with the zoning requirement for fixture design, light intensity levels at property lines and maximum illumination levels. Full Cut Off Luminaries Village Required Required Park District Proposed YES Flat Lenses Light Intensity at Property Lines Average IES Illumination Levels Athletic Fields Required Max 0.5 Foot - candles Maximum Average 40 Foot - candle YES Max 0.19 Foot - candles (38% of Max) Average 30 Foot- candles (75% of Max) Average IES Illumination Levels Average 40 Foot- candles Average 21 Foot - candles (53% of Max) Driving Range Additional detailed lighting information can be found on Drawings 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 and in the Light Manufacturers packet. BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY Athletic Fields The Mt. Prospect Park District athletic programs at Melas Park currently support over 1700 participants, and over 1000 spectators, the majority of these being Village of Mount Prospect residents. Convenient use of the site by participants is limited because of the limited daylight available in spring and fall when the programs are available. The addition of lights would allow the Mt. Prospect Park District to expand the programs and allow participants to use the facility after work/school. Golf Driving Range The community benefits of a lighted range and ball fields are simply that they increase available hours for recreational use. Most residents are home from work between 5:00pm and 6:00pm. Add dinner you are in the 6:30pm to 7:00pm range. In the spring and fall it is already dark at dinner. Even at the height of summer, you only have one hour to 1 -' /a hours for recreation use. With lighting, ball fields and driving ranges can stretch this time to 11:00pm. This affords Mt. Prospect residents more hours of "day- light" to use these outdoor recreation facilities. We are providing a service of 2 increased recreation opportunity time and programs for our increasingly busy residents. In particular, it allows families more time to use the range, since a large percentage of driving range participants are children. Driving ranges are starting grounds for golfers. With more usable hours, the availability for evening practice time will increase for Mount Prospect's two high school golf teams whose numbers have nearly doubled over the past decade. Finally, we intend to create a state of the art golf learning center with a grass tee, practice greens, short game area and all weather teaching bays in what now is essentially a wet hole in the ground. It will be conveniently centered in the heart of Mt. Prospect surrounded by the sports field complex and accessible from a main arterial street. In order to-feasibly provide such an upscale golf facility and add this amenity to the community, lights are an essential feature to the overall operation's success. MITIGATION OF POTENTIAL IMPACT TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS • Operations of athletic field and driving range lights may impact adjacent properties to the east and to a lesser extent, to the south. AHPD operations to the west include athletic field lighting and VOAH Public Works to the north is a daytime operation. Neither will be impacted by lights. • All proposed lights are designed to Village codes with full cut -off luminaries to keep the majority of the light on the fields/range and with minimum spillover to adjacent properties. (See design section and drawings 1 of 2 and 2 of 2). • The majority of luminaries are directed away from the residential properties (east and south). • Lights can (and will) be programmed to turn on and off via remote control insuring that agreed upon hours of operation are enforced. • Lights are fully adjustable after installation to ensure the optimum lighting effects. ■ Relief from a 30' minimum side yard setback (4' proposed) to allow for the future placement of a Driving Range Control Building. HISTORY Same as above DESIGN The Driving Range Control building is a vital component of the proposed driving range. Golf balls and club rental will be distributed to Range users through this facility and mechanical and electrical services will be located here. Storage for equipment and supplies necessary to support the range will also be provided. The buildings location has been chosen because of its proximity to existing parking. Approximately 10 existing parking spaces will be lost by the placement of the Driving .Range Control Building, however, the construction of additional parking is being discussed as part of the proposed salt storage facility BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY The placement of the Control Building will allow the use to readily access the driving range from the existing on -site parking. Security of the facility will also be enhanced by placing the building where it can be accessed by police, fire, and other emergency agencies. MITIGATION OF POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS None anticipated 3 NO AN AGREE... jO BETWF" THE VILLAGE OF ls_ : PROSPECT, THE MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT, AND THE ARLINGTON HEIGHTS PARK DISTRICT FOR THE RECREATIONAL USE OF WATER RECLAHATION DISTRICT RETENTION RESERVOIR COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS (NELAS PARK) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 16th day of April 19 91 by and between THE VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Village "), the MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT and the ARLINGTON HEIGHTS PARK DISTRICT, municipal corporations, (hereinafter jointly referred to as "the Park Districts "). W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, all the parties hereto are legal entities organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois; and WHEREAS, the Village has entered into an agreement dated the 24th day of September, 1981, and amended on the 18th day of July, 1989, with the Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (hereinafter referred to as the "Water Reclamation District ") to develop, improve, maintain and use the Water Reclamation District Retention Reservoir (Melas Park) the premises", as further described on Exhibit A attached hereto, for recreational and sport activities. NOW, TA.zREFORE, for and in consideration of Ten and No /100 Dollars ($10.00) and the premises, covenants and undertakings of the parties hereinafter contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION ONE GRANT OF LICENSE A. The Village does hereby grant to the Park Districts the exclusive use of Melas Park except as otherwise provided herein, for recreational events and activities for a period commencing on the date of this agreement up to and including May 31, 2011, and continuing thereafter until terminated by either party upon 80 days prior written notice. The Park Districts shall have the right at their sole expense to install athletic field lighting, shelter houses and other recreational support facilities, recreational equipment, landscaping, shrubs and other plant material and parking lots all subject to the prior written approval of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District's Chief Engineer and the Village Manager. The lighting and shelter houses and parking lots shall be as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Park Districts acknowledge that they have inspected the premises and accept the premises in "'as is" condition and waive any claims against the 2 .. Village of Mount Prospect for any current or future defects which may be discovered, except for any defects not apparent by visual inspection and in particular, without limitation, any subsurface hazardous or toxic conditions. The Park Districts shall be responsible for any hazardous or toxic condition they may create. B. The Village has graded and otherwise prepared the premises for use by the Park Districts. C. The Village or the entity responsible for construction or installation of the underground storm drainage systems, pump house, north parking lot and road leading into and out of the premises currently in place shall maintain such improvements at its expense. The Park Districts shall maintain the balance of the premises and the recreational improvements on the property and share the cost of such maintenance between themselves as they may mutually agree. D. All maintenance and service fees for the electrical service on the plateau bordering Central Road shall be the responsibility of the, agency using such service or authorizing the use of such service by a third party. E. Anything in this agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the Village reserves the right to conduct maintenance on the underground drainage systems serving the retention basin at any time on 48 hours notice to the Park Districts. The Village will use its best efforts not to disrupt Park District programs but the Village shall not be liable for any disruption to said programs. This shall in no way affect the =W Village's right o conduct emergency mains lance without notice to any parties. F. The Park District shall grade and seed the portions of the premises as set forth on Exhibit A by December 31, 1991 and will use their best efforts to complete the other items as outlined on Exhibit A as soon as reasonably possible taking into consideration the financial, resources and the recreational needs of the Park Districts and two communities. SECTION TWO USE A. The Park Districts agree and specifically understand that the license is granted exclusively to the Park Districts. The license does not give the Park Districts any interest or estate in the land. Both the Village and the Water Reclamation District, except as herein provided otherwise, retain control of said premises, including access thereto at all times for emergency purposes and routine testing and maintenance and the right to enter upon and use the premises for the purpose of making such surveys, soil borings or other purposes as may be deemed necessary by the Village or the Water Reclamation District in the further- ance of corporate purposes. However, any such use of the property, except for emergencies and routine testing and maintenance by the Water Reclamation District or the Village, which would interfere with scheduled Park District programs or - 4 - activities may be wade only upon at least 8o ways prior written notice. The Park Districts shall have the right to determine reasonable programs to be conducted on the premises and the hours during which the public may have access to the premises. B. The Village reserves the right to allow use of the premises for the annual 4th of July celebration, including a fireworks display, as well as up to four (4) other community events per year, the dates, term and duration shall be mutually coordinated by the parties. C: Any party disturbing or disrupting any part of the premises because of a particular use of the premises or because of the improvement of the premises may be required to reasonably restore the premises to their original condition other than normal wear and tear within a reasonable time after such use and /or improvement is completed. D. The Village reserves the right to allow the sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages for the aforesaid five (5) events in each calendar year. E. The Village reserves the right to use the northwest parking lot for dumping snow and as a transfer point for dumping leaves in the fall. It is agreed the snow may be stored on site. F. It is understood by the parties that the Village of Arlington Heights maintains a pumping station on the subject property. The Village of Arlington Heights shall retain such rights and /or license that it currently has to enable it to continue to use and maintain the pumping station. The existing — 5 — access road to a pumping station shall ; aain open 24.hours a day, for access by the Villages of Arlington Heights and Mount Prospect. G. Additionally, the Village of Arlington Heights may in the near future desire to construct a large diameter underground storm relief sewer on the subject property. The Village of Mount Prospect retains the full right to permit such underground storm sewer on reasonable terms agreed to by the parties using reasonable caution to minimize the disruption to the Park Districts' programs. H. The Village shall have the absolute right to the exclusive use of a portion of the site of not to exceed one acre in the extreme southwest corner of the property for placement of an elevated water storage tank. The Village's only payment to the Park Districts for the site shall be the reasonable cost of moving structures or equipment from the area to another portion of the site. I. The Village of Mount Prospect reserves the right to use a strip of the premises not less than twenty feet (20 in width along the North line of the current public works facility for utilities, ingress and egress and Village waterworks improvements. J. The Park Districts may develop the facilities in accord with applicable law. - 6 - K. The village shall be responsible for patrolling the premises consistent with the manner in which it patrols other parks in the Village. SECTION THREE TERMINATION A. In the event the Park Districts use or allow the premises to be used for any purpose other than those hereinabove specifically provided, or violate any of the provisions hereof, then this Agreement may be terminated by the Village. To affect such termination, the Village must give the Park Districts written notice to cease such improper activity or correct such violation. If the Park Districts fail to comply or are unable to comply with such notice within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notice, this Agreement shall be at an end and the Village shall have no further obligation to the Park Districts. B. If the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District or Village fails to give approval to the recreation development plans submitted by the Park Districts consistent with Exhibit A, then the Park Districts have the right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice. C. Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever, the Park Districts each have the responsibility to remove their own improvements, subject to the following: - 7 - 1. In .:he event the Village terminates this Agreement for reasons other than passage of the twenty (20) year term, breach by the Park Districts or by order of the Water Reclamation District as hereinafter set forth, the Village shall pay to the Park Districts the depreciated cost of improvements made to the property, determined through use of a 40 year straight line depreciation method applied to the actual costs incurred by the Park Districts, less any federal or state grant monies received, in improving the property for such things as engineering,. surveying, grading, drainage, seeding, landscaping, construction, purchase and /or installation of structures and equipment that have been approved by the Village of Mount Prospect and the Water Reclamation District. 2. If the Agreement is terminated for cause, or because the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District terminates the Village's lease or any other agreements pertaining to the. premises, or by the passage of the twenty (20) year term, the Park Districts shall vacate said premises at their expense, within eighty (80) days of receiving written notice. If the agreement is terminated under this subsection (2),.the Village of Mount Prospect shall not be responsible'. for payment for any improvements of any kind or nature installed by the Park Districts. 3. Upon the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever, the Park Districts shall, upon request of the Village, remove or cause to be removed any and all debris on the premises 8 and any and all landscaping, equipment, facilities, or other things erected or placed upon the premises and will yield up the premises to the Village in as good condition as when the same was entered upon by the Park Districts. Upon the Park Districts' failure to do so, the Village after eighty (80) days prior written notice of intent to do so, may accomplish such removal at the sole expense and cost of the Park Districts. SECTION FOUR INDEMNIFICATION A. The Park Districts shall be solely responsible for and shall defend, indemnify, keep and save harmless, the Village of Mt. Prospect and the Water Reclamation District, their officers, elected officials, commissioners, agents and employees, against all injuries, deaths, losses, damages, claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses, which may in any way accrue, directly or indirectly, against the Village or the Water Reclama- tion District, their officers, elected officials, agents or employees, in consequence of the granting of this license, or which may in any way result therefrom or from any work done thereunder. This indemnification and hold harmless shall apply whether or not it is alleged or determined that the act was caused through negli- gence or omission of the Park Districts, *or Park Districts' elected officials, employees, or of any contractor or subcontractor, or 9 - their employees This indemnification a; hold harmless shall apply to any damage done to the Park Districts' property on account of flood, rainfall, snow, water damage and any other acts of God. The Park Districts shall., at their sole expense, appear, defend, and pay all charges of attorneys and all costs and other expenses arising under this paragraph A or incurred in connection therewith. B. The Village shall be solely responsible for and shall defend, indemnify, keep and save harmless,,the Park Districts and the Water Reclamation District, their officers, commissioners, agents and employees, against all injuries, deaths, losses, damages, claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses, which may in any way accrue, directly or indirectly, against the Park Districts or either of'them or their officers, elected officials, volunteers, agents or employees resulting from the Village's use of the property for the annual Fourth of July celebration and fireworks display, other events sponsored by, or use made of the property by, the Village, including use made of the property for maintenance purposes, whether or not it shall be alleged or' determined that the act was caused through the negligence or omission of the Village of Mt. Prospect, or the Village's agents or employees, or of any contractor, subcontractor or service organization or their agents or employees, if any, and the Village shall, at its sole expense, appear, defend, and pay all charges of attorneys and all costs and other expenses arising therefrom or incurred in connection therewith. - 10 - The Park Districts, prior to entering upon said premises and using the same for the purposes for which this permission is issued, shall procure, maintain and keep in force, at their own expense, comprehensive general liability and property damage coverage to which the other parties, namely the Village and the Water Reclamation District, their Commissioners,.officers, elected officials, volunteers, agents and employees, as the case may be, are extended such coverage; said coverage shall have limits of not less than: Bodily Injury Liability: Each Person: $1,000,000 Each Accident: $1,000,000 Property Damage Liability: Each Accident: $1,000,000 Prior to using said premises, the Park Districts shall furnish to the Village, certificates of such coverage or other suitable evidence that such coverage has been procured and is maintained in full force and effect., Such coverage shall provide that no change, modification in or cancellation of any coverage shall become effective until the expiration of ten (10) days after written notice thereof shall have been given by the entity providing coverage to the Village. The provisions of this Section shall in no way limit the liability of the parties as set forth under the provisions of this paragraph. - 11 - The parties expressly understand and agree that the liability coverage required by this Agreement, or otherwise provided by the parties, shall in no way limit the responsibility of the parties to defend, indemnify, keep and save harmless the others in accord with the terms of this agreement. C. Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitration The parties to this agreement expressly agree that, in the event a claim is made naming more than one party as defendants, within sixty (60) days after service of said claim on all parties named, or at another time agreed upon by all parties in writing, all parties agree to confer and discuss in good faith the issues of relative culpability and /or contribution among the parties, and to attempt to determine the manner in which all costs, attorneys fees, compensation, damages and all other like charges shall be allocated among the parties in the defense of said claim, or for settlement or trial of the claim. If no agreement is reached within 90 days, the parties shall have the right to take whatever action, whether legal or otherwise, available to them to enforce their rights under this agreement. SECTION FIVE MISCELLANEOUS Notice - Any notice herein provided to be given shall be deemed properly served if delivered in writing personally or mailed by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return - 12 - receipt requested, to the parties in care of such persons or addresses as either party may from time to time designate in writing. Conflict - Wherever this agreement conflicts with any previous agreements and leases signed with the Metropolitan Sanitary District (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District) and still in effect, the previous agreements and leases with the Metropolitan Sanitary District (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District) shall be in full force and effect and any conflicts in this agreement shall be null and void. Joint and Several Liabilit y - The Park Districts shall be jointly and severally liable for carrying out the terms of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in triplicate by their authorized officials, and to be duly attested and have caused their corporate seals to be fixed hereunto, all on the day and year first above written. VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT MAYOR ATTE T: VILLAGE CLERK - 13 - MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT ATTEST: �--- ARLINGTON HEIGHTS PARK DISTROC7 . ............... ATTEST: -- 14 - CL `~ �0 m c W ,� U f. QD ! t ;{ O l 4 0 f�V f 0 ;A N a�mc � � O O O 0 l 4 V 0 M= a I V - 0,1 0 � , .1,� O � 0 z 46 AGE OF C 0- = PROSPECT O O 0 l 4 V 0 M= a I V - 0,1 0 � , .1,� O � 0 #TTACoftYA6IJr No. I B Mt, Prospect Park District Project References Glenview Park District Community Park Glenview, IL Fremd High School Football Field Palatine, IL Des Plaines Park District West Park Des Plaines, IL Mt. Prospect High School Football Field Mt. Prospect, IL Evanston High School Football Field Evanston, IL Fox Valley Park District Multiple Parks Aurora, IL Lincoln Way Schools Baseball, Softball, Football Fields New Lennox, IL References Arlington Heights Park District Pioneer Park, Sunset Meadows Arlington Heights, IL Village of Vernon Hills Soccer and Baseball Fields Vernon Hills, IL Northbrook Park District Anetsburger Park Northbrook, IL Naperville Park District Multiple Parks Naperville, IL Glenbard High Schools Football Fields Carol Stream, EL Conant High School Football Field Hoffman Estates, IL Northfield Park District Willow Park Northfield, IL Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago 100 EAST ERIE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60611 -3154 312.751.5600 Terrence J. O'Brren President Kathleen Therese Meany Vice President Gloria Alitto Majewski Chairman of Finance Frank Avila Patricia Horton Barbara J. McGowan Cynthia M. Santos Debra Shore Mariyana T. Spyropoulos January 7, 2011 Or . Via FedEx Louis J. Ennesser, Jr., RLA Director of Parks and Planning Mount Prospect Park District 1000 West Central Road Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Re: Request by the Mount Prospect Park District { "MPPD ") to Execute an Affidavit of Ownership in Association with its Application for Conditional Use Approval for Improvements to Melas Park; L -123; File No. 10 NE 014. Dear Mr. Ennesser: The MPPD recently requested that the District execute an Affidavit of Ownership for District property leased to the MPPD and known as Melas Park. The Affidavit is required to be submitted to the Village of Mount Prospect's Zoning Board in association with MPPD's application for conditional use approval for the proposed installation of sports field lighting and protective netting at the referenced park. Accordingly enclosed please find an executed Affidavit of Ownership. If you have any other questions regarding this matter, please contact Nathaniel P. English, Senior Legal Assistant, at (312) 751 -6563. Sincerely, Susan T. Morak is Principal Assistant Attorney STM:npe Enclosure STATE OF ILLNOIS } SS COUNTY OF COOK ) AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, Richard Lanyon, under oath, state that I am an authorized officer of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, that the property commonly known as Melas Park is owned by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as of this date. Richard Lanyo , ecutive Director i ". Subscribed and Sworn to before me tsiy of Deem D Ndnk Y U LIC SUS M SCyq� NOTARY USLIC . STATE OF ILLINOIS COIIAMISSION E " ._ j Corporate: i00 'st A vF, `!'•less PO 2nx 300 Oskaloosc. !A 12K7 i Mancafacturing. 2 S,.;f�,rt. Road. P 6f� 260 - !A 6276: 6 - 0,001V56-1205 ax: 800V374-6402 Web: ,. ,_..'.'MSCOJ. Orl Email : lS�E'Ci�l� ?rlt.scG.C,GiT? Melas Park Proposed Athletic Field and Driving Range Mt. Prospect, IL April 15, 2011 Scope of work: - Musco Lighting has been asked by Lou Ennesser of the Mt. Prospect Park District to put together lighting designs for lighting the athletic fields and driving range at Melas Park. In doing so we had to abide by the lighting ordinance set by the village. Below are our proposed lighting designs: Village Ordinance: - Maximum average IES illumination level not to exceed 40 foot - candies - Spill light not to exceed 0.5 foot - candies at the property line Proposed Lighting Design: - Light the athletic fields to 30 footcandles - Light the driving range to 21 foot - candles Resulting Spill Light - maximum of .19 foot- candies at the property line As you can see, we propose to light both the athletic fields and the driving range, while staying within village code for both field lighting as well as spill fight. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at any time. Thank you, Bryan Bolin Field Representative Musco Sports Lighting, LLC 630 -432 -1036 cell 630 - 876 -9654 fax bryan.bolin @musco.com Lighting; ... We Make It Happen. Typical Light — Structure Green" System Detail — 4 Luminaires Green Generation® Luminaire Removable Pole Cop 1. Poletop Luminaire Assembly 2. Wire Harness (inside Pole) Attachment Bracket 3. Electrical Components -- Enclosure — Ballasts — Capacitors —Smart Lamp Control — Fusing — Primary Landing Lugs —One Disconnect Per Circuit Per tight— Structure Green — Grounding Lug 4. Galvanized Steel Pole (1 Z 3 or 4 Sections) 5. Precast Concrete Base Centrifugally Spun, Prestressed 3' -4 T /2' [1029mmj ire Access Hub Handhole with Grounding Lug Access Jacking Ear [3048mm] *2� —O• Ground Level [610mm] Customer /Contractor supplies—.j — Grounding rod and connection j Concrete Backfill to system grounding iug — Concrete backfill — Underground wiring / — Service entrance Lifting Our Hate Above Ground Access Hole Underground Access Hole Grounding Rad SIDE VIEW Connection System FRONT VIEW FIELD SIDE Notes: 1. This drawing is not to scale. 2. • This dimension for reference only. Variances may occur depending on steel pole tolerances, concrete tolerances, galvanizing thickness, hole depth accuracy. 3. Fusco provides a base installation bar, an installation level modified for taper, and installation wedges. 4. Provisions for auxiliary equipment such as speaker or security lighting can be incorporated. S. Copyright 1991, 2007, 2008 klusco Lighting. Patents issued and pending. LSC -04 Typical Light — Structure Green"" System Detail - 5 Luminaires MugfA; Green GeneratianP Luminaire _ —Removable Pale Cap 1. Poletop Luminaire Assembly 2. Wire Harness (inside Pole) Attachment Bracket Customer /Contractor supplies: V underground Access Hole — Grounding rod and connection Concrete Backfitl to system grounding fug 5. Precast Concrete Base - Con crete nd w irt � — underground wiring Centrifugally Spun, Prestressed — Service entronce Grounding Rod FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW s stem ection FIELD SIDE Notes: 1. This drawing is not to scale. 2. • This dimension for reference only. Variances may occur depending on steel pate tolerances, concrete tolerances, galvanizing thickness, hole depth accuracy. 3. Fusco provides a terse installation bar, an installation level modified for toper, and installation wedges. 4. Provisions for auxiliary equipment such as speaker or security lighting can be incorporated. 5. Copyright 1991, 2007, 2008 Musco Lighting. Patents issued and pending. LSG -05 3. Electrical Components 4' - 4 1/2' Enclosure [1334mm] — Ballasts — Capacitors —Smart Lamp Control — Fusing Wire Access Hub — Primary Landing Lugs —0ne Disconnect Per Circuit Per Light — Structure GreenTmsystem Handhole with — Grounding Lug Grounding Lug Access Jacking Ear i [3048mm) 4. Galvanized Steel Pole (1, Z, 3 or 4 Sections) Lifting Bar Hole [610mm] Above Ground Access Hole Ground Level Customer /Contractor supplies: V underground Access Hole — Grounding rod and connection Concrete Backfitl to system grounding fug 5. Precast Concrete Base - Con crete nd w irt � — underground wiring Centrifugally Spun, Prestressed — Service entronce Grounding Rod FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW s stem ection FIELD SIDE Notes: 1. This drawing is not to scale. 2. • This dimension for reference only. Variances may occur depending on steel pate tolerances, concrete tolerances, galvanizing thickness, hole depth accuracy. 3. Fusco provides a terse installation bar, an installation level modified for toper, and installation wedges. 4. Provisions for auxiliary equipment such as speaker or security lighting can be incorporated. 5. Copyright 1991, 2007, 2008 Musco Lighting. Patents issued and pending. LSG -05 Typical Light— Structure Green System Detail — 6 Luminaires Green Generation® Luminaire 1. Poletop Luminaire Assembly 2. Wire Harness (Inside Pole) Attachment Bracket 3. Electrical Components Enclosure — Ballasts — Capacitors —Smart Lamp® Control — Fusing — Primary Landing Lugs -One Disconnect Per Circuit Per Light— Structure Green System — Grounding Lug 4. Galvanized Steel Pole (1, 2, 3 or 4 Sections) 5. Precast Concrete Base Centrifugally Spun, Prestressed 4' -4 1/2" [1334mm] Jacking Ear *10' -0' [3048--] W -0 . [810mm] Ground Level I Customer /Contractor supplies: — Grounding rod and connection Concrete Backfilf to system grounding lug — Concrete backfill — Underground wiring — Service entrance Removable Pole Cap Wore Access Hub Handhole with Grounding Lug Access lifting Bor Hole Above Ground Access Hole Underground Access Hole Grounding Rod FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW s connection System FIELD SIDE Notes: 1. This drawing is not to scale, 2. * This dimension for reference only. Variances may occur depending on steel pole tolerances, concrete tolerances, galvanizing thickness, hale depth accuracy. 3. Musco provides a base installation bar, an installation level modified for toper, and installation wedges. 4. Provisions for auxWory equipment such as speaker or security fighting can be incorporated. 5. Copyright 1991, 2007, 2008, 2010 kfusco Lighting. Patents issued and pending. LSG -06 ■ ■^ � �.\ | 2 k § § $ § \ ( ` .� k\ \ ■� )2 §k�)§)! | 2| )\ .�� k \\ §m§; ■ � � `.�. w �� ` ■. ) k«!!£ !! | Eft !§ | ■k| §7 ! :, ) \)$k)2kkk§k �\ ;k2 §f£ §2 !f |k g k {k� k L7 | ! |» ,! �! {f !\ t 2 ° 0% § ( ! � � tF 4 xb �y aqp 'Jyp JE :3 6 a t g S B q s q � XS s � p i bQ�g i f a :i•�s ?1 �" ' 1 :: n R n n n N a R � n n n � \ 1\�� ' � y �• 144 ��` '' q R n n n n n t• •••:i:: o n n n n n f•• =...i�: F • ` f t f � •� q c n n � i � n n n n n n R n � n n� �••�'� ' 1 ` `' 1 $"i w ♦ n R w w b q n n N n n q R N . n s fly 000 — •� -�_ __��.��' `� \ a rr t i i - i . ...... ....... .............. ..-•- ......_......... ...... - gum s d€ 5Q� s n 0 / r` i l l i �:� � :tom n n n -. n •, n •. -. •. Y -. n •. n n n R n n n t =,: � r•' 1 , jn n e n n q y R � n •. -. n -, n R n n •. R n n It.lai•i%j,� :I r ' j n n n n -. n n n K n •. . n n •. -. R > > n n n; ` :�.� � I I I F n n n n n n o n n -s R o nl � f � •{ 1 , • • ' 1 r q R K n n n n R R R Y K �4 � 1# �', � � i 1 • t n ! f { - `� � � � Ir q � n q n a •a • n a - n s ; � � � If 1 O. 10L y t •s 1 I k - 1: d i 1 ....... .. ............................... ...... .....- ......._..._....... _.....: o ff i Y - 1 ! i f i i� lu lu a V a 4 b � g Y R ba tt lu 1922 z e� b u t m I � $12 B � 5 S M.`Qsg P ; s� € �1� S 418 s� �a z t z 4 I s Mfg IWO WE 0 pus F : - [me Im 8 U® �+ LU t • LLI . own 7 I ! it • " c l i " y l ,WI § k | � § 2 � 7 | � ƒ�) §l -oil AW § m; .5, 2 � =a w. !!!. fill | ! - |7 | ■ §k �/!21 k�# $} :Ups ` §$ «| 77) | 22 ■ ■!!_! |, !�_ , |j |2��|kklkl \J) !� !� 2K� !;! ■!!| +| � !| ■i § § � \ § ! � ! it ji Ila fia n A Ali bEl ! a b 55a$� b P g h h w uTw � e S — s � I N U. 11 s m LL� P a a i a a a 3 3 3 1 i l S i i i i a 3 7 i a 3 a a 7 i a 3 1 3 a a a 3 a a A a 3 a 1 1 a A a aaxaaaaaaaa2aaaxaaaaF ;aaaaiaaalsalasiaiiaxax i a a a a 3 a a a 3 a 3 a ` 3 3 __ a a a x a a 3 a 7 a 7 a a A 3 a A a a 7 a a a a i a a a a i 3 2 F a a a a a a a a 3 3 7; a a a 3 3 7 3 1 a a a ia2 7 a l a a i F F i 13 3 3 3 i a i a 3 a 7 a i d 3 1 a i a a a a aaa a i 7aii a:xat a a II a aaa aaa; saiF ,� a a a a a a a a a a 1 3 i 3 aaaa aaaa aa•. aaa.af� a x a aaaa aaaa 333333 aaasaa ixsaai aaaaaa aaaaaa aaaa -aa iaaasi aaaaaa aaaaaa aaaaaa aaasaa aaaaaa aaaaaa aaaaaa assxaa aaaaaa aaaaaa a a 2 a F a aaaaaa aaaaaa a 3 3 i a a saaaxi aaasaa. aaaaaa: 331737: aaaaaa a a i a a a i a a i a a a a 1 a i 4 a i a i a a a a aaaaa a a a a a a a a a a a a a A a a a a a a a a a aaa a a a 1 aaa a a a a a A a a as a aaa a a a t a a a a a a a a a -1 A; x i a a a a a a a a A a a a a Y a a a i a a iaaaaaaiaxa:laaaaixa Va a a 1 a a a 2 a a a a s a a a 1 a a a 7 3 a a a 3 Y 7 a d a 3 aaaaaa ;aaxat�xa;aataa 33 , 1 - Aa_ 313tAIaad11a a A aaa ixsa a taa a i x a i t a i a i i Saaa a 3,xia x aaaa a 5 : a } s s i a 1 3 i s �a a a ixa aaa a 3 a 11 A Nk I 0 3 w b 010p i - - - is ax Y Y 3 a s i a a a a a a a a aaa •.a' aaa xi�a a: a�s aa:x a a a F as .`...3.µ. i.a.ta..:..a..a a a a a a a - axsl - iaa3 as aaa :Iai13�a; aaa ixsa a taa a i x a i t a i a i i Saaa a 3,xia x aaaa a 5 : a } s s i a 1 3 i s �a a a ixa aaa a 3 a 11 A Nk I 0 3 w b 010p i o ., Ha S � 4 g O f K w � 2 a Q a e a f a I' e r �~ 1 �'— . ;......- ».......... 1 I H 4 1 i Milli r �k Pill Mg a Z $ s F 6 � � a 4 R� a U 0 1 jai � = 8 Ox 6 J 14 3 'g N� �pPil7 r7iYj 6£IfY� Y3= Hi Eli K�K� u � �s iIE ik li i SAW S j ' j 13 1 1 I i 1 11 S da 1 i I Jett O 0 ss L w p $ /1 E j i �i. � •3j� 4jj�i} � ism HE Z,6 I ii } i; 1: z } 5 } 1 1i i; 000 ' s ..... .... .... .......... ...... } s.. i5,' �41 �_ N $ S a a a a �$ c a a a a a� a a a a � a a �� •�a� $ a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaa�aaaa - aaaa xome Es 1 a - t1RJ3H r w f N -Yxx a xxxxYxx a nn" n n ERR R RRki�RRB � - e @@ it ltSC - Qre is 8 �1 s 2 S I 3 ; S 3 AORI 'i i �9 y3y3 w _ _ �11 $i V A� a w� 0 x� a Andrade, Consuelo From: Heather Krakora [ Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 2:00 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: a request by the Mount Prospect Park District to use the retention pond as a lighted driving range Attachments: ATT00001.txt To whom it.may concern, I am a resident of Mt. Prospect and I am against using the retention pond as a lighted driving range. This area is utilized by the residents of Mt. Prospect for various activities, such as running, biking, sledding, etc. For the park district to "take over" the entire area and use it for one purpose would be disappointing to the various people and families that use that site for non -golf related activities. There a plenty of ranges in the area earmarked for this purpose. Please allow the rest of us "non golfers" the luxury of having a great area to do all sorts of various activities. Kind regards, Heather Krakora 109 Bobfiy Lane Mt. ProsFect, IL 60056 773 -480 -5952 This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http_ / /www.messagelabs.com /email RECEIVED .JUN 15 2011 We, the undersigned are in support of the Mt. Prospect Park District installing lights at the Melas Park Athletic Complex and golf driving range. Printed Name Address 13 uldle - $N 14A-r We, the undersigned are in support of the Mt. Prospect Park District installing lights at the Melas Park Athletic Complex and golf driving range. Printed Name 4 0 'ea r� n & I I M CN- -) x Address L 7i &I I 0 ? �, WC6 t 4. u ►� A� ad r 5 S�&,e- 6 wct^/ L I - e c( t m A/e (q S . i O"Ue r /),- . We, the undersigned are in support of the Mt. Prospect Park District installing lights at the Melas Park Athletic Complex and golf driving range. Printed Name & L)t r - 'j Address 4o fil (A!-5& ffi_i 1 PI �"'V\ 1& Z 1< Am t 1 c) zEMQkll 24 4 1 Sn " 1 r e� , -- I 1 S. ) 37., A_1�� We, the undersigned are in support of the Mt. Prospect Park District installing lights at the Melas Park Athletic Complex and golf driving range. Printed Name AE Address — 7 e C V., i L &$'° e P /-,I )W I LO 4(6 �k(� �Pj 1 J Y end" / - 'ld We, the undersigned are in support of the Mt. Prospect Park District installing lights at the Melas Park Athletic Complex and golf driving range. Printed Name - ;T4CI e �C LbGC) C�TC5 ?OLJC III Address Signature 57 1 DAVG- - aV e za/ Pe C) ler . 14, f77) 6" ) we 1i V'L L 6e, S'.4 4 4oe- 0-I's L 16 II& Co. n"k0pb Ala " Vs 1 U C Q � We, the undersigned are in support of the Mt. Prospect Park District installing lights at the Melas Park Athletic Complex and golf driving range. Printed Name A JL c�e'r l R.� PfI S C * "TL 5 - C gc; m v- a -rf AWA(oJe .fi G.d� 4G �larit r�.ss �,�► - vt V Address I - 'Y - 1 - 7- >' C °'eys L 1 g� /'-- a "w h o /'P'�fv- 1 1-1 1 IC (IV\ A VA- 223 To the neighbors of Melas Park, On Thursday, June 9 at the Central Community Center in Mount Prospect, the Mount Prospect Park District welcomed residents and shared their development plans for their half of Melas Park. It is an impressive plan that includes a lighted golfing range and lighted ball fields for the park district's youth football and youth soccer programs. Residents were .told that the plans, while currently incomplete, are likely to cost between $1M and $1.4M million dollars. Walter Cook, CEO of the Park District, suggested that the funding for the project would come from general obligation bonds that would be repaid with proceeds from the new driving range. Mr. Cook projected that the project would pay for itself in 7 years after which time it would generate in excess of six figures ($100,000) annually. Specific numbers were not provided as the plans remain incomplete. On its surface this sounds like a plausible development plan for the community with little to no cost to the tax payers. Mr. Cook was passionate in articulating the Park District's position. He did a very nice job of explaining the lack of open space in Mount Prospect that can be used for leisure activities. He explained the need for gated ball fields that are dedicated solely for youth sports. He clearly had a command of the interests of the Park District. About a dozen or so of the neighboring home Owners, myself included, came out to voice concerns about the project. The home owners were equally passionate in the defense of their property rights, if somewhat less articulate, as Mr. Cook. They described the effect the current ball fields, developed in 2007 and opened in 2009, have had on the quality of life in the neighborhood. Issues ranging from an increase in traffic through the neighborhood, increased parking congestion on our streets, and an increase in the abuse of private property in the neighborhood during park district sponsored games. The residents asserted that the addition of a driving range and the increase in activity in the park after dusk will only exacerbate these problems while at the same time lowering our property values. Mr. Cook and the Park District have a difficult challenge in trying to provide an important service to our community, and a service that certainly makes Mount Prospect a better place to live and raise families. Mr. Cook's concern is for all of the families that participate in Park District programs. He was very clear in stating that while there are roughly 50 neighbors who oppose the development plan, there are a thousand or more who are in favor of the plan, and he went on to state that we live in a democracy and the majority rules. This is where Mr. Cook and I are very much in disagreement. Yes, we live in a democracy. More importantly we live in society that protects the rights of the common man and we have a long and rich history of protecting the property rights of individual home owners. Our zoning rules exist to ensure that our neighbors cannot make changes to their property that reduce the value or usability of our property. And, that applies to government authorities as well. For the average homeowner zoning rules are all we have to maintain the integrity of our neighborhoods, preserve our quality of life and of course protect us from economic harm. In our case the Park District is our neighbor and they are proposing changes to their property that will most certainly cause harm in all of those ways. The changes will alter the character of our neighborhood by bringing in more traffic congestion and substantially raising noise pollution after dark. What is currently a quiet and sleepy street in the evening will become a parking lot with strangers milling about. The Park District is proposing changes that will reduce our families' quality of life and inhibit our ability to continue to enjoy our homes in the evening. Additionally, these changes will most certainly reduce the market value of our homes, our most personal and our most important financial asset. Just imagine the.challenge of selling a property adjacent to a noisy field that will be lit until 10:30pni pm and flooded with cheering fans. While we appreciate the fact that Mr. Cook told the crowd on Wednesday night that "he gets it ", such a remark is of little consolation when families with young children lie awake late in the evening looking at the bright lights through the bed room windows and listening to the cheers of the crowds. While we will take him at his word that he "gets it ", it is of little consolation that the homeowners in the neighborhood suffer the economic loss his proposed changes will bring about. And, of course the fact that "he gets it" will not help at all the fact that families in the neighborhood will literally be locked into this situation as it will hardly be possible to sell and move. Granting the variance would surely be a violation of our property rights. Please join me at the public hearing on June 23' and help me protect the property rights of all of the neighbors of Melas Park. The meeting will be at 7:30pm at the Mount Prospect Village Hall, 50 South Emerson Street in Mount Prospect. This meeting is our opportunity to remind the zoning commission that our individual property rights are more important than the Park District's desire to hold youth football and youth soccer games late into the evening. A thousand people in Mount Prospect may be in favor of Thursday night football but they shouldn't be allowed to do it at the expense of 50 families who have invested both their finances and livelihoods in the neighboring property. I believe Mount Prospect still values the property rights of the little guy. Help me make sure the zoning commission doesn't lose sight of that fact as Mr. Cook eloquently articulates why late night football is more important than our families. Sincerely, Gary Gilmer, Jr. 106 N. Kenilworth Ave. f North Kenilworth Avenue Homeowners RLE �a ' Neighbors opposing the Melas Park Lighting Project VILLAGE OF n MT P1?SPE6- TO: Consuelo Andrade FROM: Gary Gilmer, Jr. & the Residents of North Kenilworth Ave JUN 15 2011 DATE: June 14, 2011 c ornirL`J n hj €1 V °Ji 3�iY31i :YI SUBJECT: PZ -15 -11 Mount Prospect Park District / Melas Park / Conditional Use and Variation I am writing on behalf of my neighbors on North Kenilworth Ave and myself to formally protest the proposed zoning variation for approval to construct a lighted driving range and install eight (8)70 foot light fixtures at Melas Park. We are protesting on the grounds that the request does not meet the Standards for Variations defined in Chapter 14, Article 1, Section 203, Paragraph C, Sub - section 9. In truth, the request fails to meet the standards on the following basis: a. No specific hardship would result to the Petitioner other than mere inconvenience if the letter of the regulation were applied. b. The conditions upon which the application is made are not unique to the property for which the variation is sought. c. The primary purpose of the proposal is for financial gain of the Petitioner. The driving range is intended to generate in excess of $100,000 annually for the Park District * *If ** it stays open after dark. d. There is no difficulty or hardship, other than darkness, identified by the Petitioner. e. The granting of this variation will cause financial injury to the surrounding property. The Petitioner has offered no fact based evidence to the contrary. f. The granting of the variation will alter the essential character of the neighborhood through increased traffic and congestion on North Kenilworth Avenue and will bring a great deal of late night noise to an otherwise quiet street. The Petitioner has offered no fad based evidence to the contrary. g. The granting of the variation will substantially increase the congestion on North Kenilworth Ave, a public street, and it will substantially diminish the propertyvalues in the neighborhood. The Petitioner has offered no fact based evidence to the contrary. We apologize for amateurish legal explanation above. We are not attorneys but we are doing our best to interpret the legal definitions provided to us by the Village without incurring financial hardship to formally protest this request. In the interest of stating this in more English terms: a. The petitioner is asking for a variance in order to hold sporting events after dark and to generate additional revenue from the driving range after dark. Darkness is an inconvenience to the Petitioner and does not qualify as a hardship. r North Kenilworth Avenue Homeowners Neighbors opposing the Melas Park Lighting Project b. There are other lighted fields in Mount Prospect that can already be used for these purposes; namely Lions Park and Majewski Park. There are also additional parks where the sporting events can be held during daylight hours including Sunrise Park. c. The primary purpose for the lighting at the Driving range is to extend the hours of operation of the range and increase the revenue needed to pay for the project. d. The only hardship created by the current zoning rules is that the Petitioner cannot conduct leisure activities late into the evening. Leisure activities hardly qualify as a hardship. e. The variation will most certainly harm our property and our ability to enjoy the use of our property. The noise, traffic congestion, and debris left in our yards are without question harmful. f. We live on a street that is sleepy and quiet in the evening. That fact is core to the character of our neighborhood. The petitioner should not be allowed to alter that character. g. The impact on the value of the neighboring property is enormous to the homeowners on North Kenilworth Ave. Very few potential buyers will want to live less than 200 feet from the light and noise that would come with this variation. The current market value of the homes on just the west side of North Kenilworth Ave (6/13/2011) according to Ziliow Real Estate is estimated at $6,142,000. If each homeowner experiences a 10% decrease in value because the pool of potential buyers goes down we will collectively lose $614,200 for the mere convenience of the Petitioner. If we want to avoid the affect the variation will have on our quality of life we will be forced to sell. If forced to sell in the current economic environment that loss will be multiplied by the loss of equity that most of us have already experienced in the past decade. The hardship will be ours, not the Petitioner's. This should not be allowed to happen. These are the standards defined by the Village as the criteria that must be met to grant a variation. Failure to meet any one standard should result in a denial of the Petitioner's request. It is our position that the Petitioner has failed to meet ALL of the defined standards and has failed to even attempt to provide any factual evidence to the contrary. Sincerely, The undersigned residents of North Kenilworth Avenue r Q1 Q) 0) Gi Q] Q� OJ OJ (li L1} 0J OJ N N 0) O .- t! It t! If "t v r- t t' t: t tt t if O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 0 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 � y • C Y C Y C Y • C Y C Y • C Y • C Y • C Y C Y C se •C Y C X C X C •C Y •C Y v Z a 0 Z rI 0 Z N a 2 co 0 z it 0 Z Ln 0 Z LO 0 Z n 0 Z 00 0 z 0 0 z O � r 1 � Z N � 2 M � Z Ln rl Z to rl a r-1 � � r-4 � T-4 r-4 r4 � � � r-4 V-1 rq a Z LLJ - u q - +, L O = 07 Dw A - r m Y U Y Y W I c > co e-f N M et to cO n W 01 r�-1 + a�i y � C �+ ki 3 — ai ai ai ai ti 3 c 3 3 c 3 c 3 c 0 0 0 0 o a a 3 3 3 — 3 a� �L Z m Y Z a, Y Z m ]C Z m Y Z C x C Y C x C c c c 0 Y Z O) Y Z N m Z 07 Y Z r4 c H e e f N Z q* z LA z w Z fl z 00 Z 0) ri ci r-I ei Q Y Vf CL f6 y _ +h 3 C � 'a U tkO C () O 0 y U C] V) V C7 z 00 m N N N N N N N N N N f M M M C �+ ki 3 — 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 — 3 — 3 _3 c z z V1 z UD z f� c z 00 c z O N C z c N c z N N a z QN a z N m z N m z 00 N a Y N cn o a) 0 w C7 m } f4 m O En ° v m m m m m m C Lo Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM 103 FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER JULY 21, 2011 JULY 28, 2011 PACKET INFORMATION Village staff has received additional correspondence for case #PZ- 15 -11, which is the Conditional Use and Variation requests for the property located at 1400 W. Central Road ( Melas Park). Attached please find emails and letters from the public regarding the zoning requests for Melas Park. The staff report and exhibits for this case were included in the packets for the June meeting, which was subsequently canceled. Please notify the Community Development Department if a second copy of the information is needed. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (847) 818 -5314. HAPLAMPlannfng &Zonhtg C0MMT &Z2011LStattiicpo1s?PZ- 151114DO W.Cartnd Rd- Melas PVk Suppleman.docx Andrade, Consuelo From: kim rivers [ Sent: Friday, June 17, 2091 12:09 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: PZ15 -11 I would like to voice my opinion on PZ 15 -11, the driving range proposal for the Melas Park water retention area. I'm strongly opposed to this. That particular area is one used often by all sorts of folks. Kids sledding in the winter, people working out, etc. The recently built football /soccer fields are bad enough, it seems to me they're used only 4 -5 weekends the entire year. Large lighting standards, and the safety nets required are just going to be an eyesore. My children and I use that area of the park a lot, and they would not understand having to stay away from it. There are enough sporting event venues in this area, and not enough large park areas for just 'regular' folks. Thank you for your consideration... Kim Rivera, 30 Millers Lane, Mt. Prospect. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messaaelabs.com/email 1 Andrade, Consuelo_ From: Jodie Moeller To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: PZ -15 -11 - Driving Range at Melas Please, please, please do NOT allow a driving range to be constructed at the Melas Park water retention area! My kids and I use this area almost daily year -round (honestly) to walk our dog and to use the hills for exercising. In the winter, it is our favorite place to go sledding. Every time I am there (no matter the weather), I see many other people enjoying the area - elderly couples, families with kids, dog - owners, etc. Just this morning, I saw a woman teaching her son how to ride a bike along the path. There are not any other recreation areas nearby that offer such a safe, spacious place to enjoy the outdoors the way the Melas water retention area does. It is especially conducive to families because it is set so far off the road. A driving range would appeal to a much smaller demographic and could only be used a portion of the year. But it's existence would take SO much away from SO many people! I am actually an avid golfer myself (my family has a tee time scheduled for this weekend) and often enjoy going to the driving range. However, there are PLENTY of other driving ranges in the area that are easily accessible. I find it completely unnecessary (and possibly heartbreaking!) to add another one at Melas. Please consider my plea to keep this beautiful area open for ALL the public to enjoy, Thank you, Jodie Moeller This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http;ILwww.messagelabs.com /email Andrade, From: Iberry99 Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:37 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: Resident response to Zoning Case PZ -15 -11 Mr. Andrade - Our family has resided in Mount Prospect for over 45 years. We were children here and are now raising our children here. In that time, we have been very proud of the effort the Village of , Mount Prospect has put forth to provide high caliber recreational facilities, programs and parks. We have utilized many of the Village facilities and opportunities and have encouraged our neighbors to do the same. It is our belief, however, that the proposed zoning changes presentedin Case PZ- 15 -11, in support of a new driving range at Melas Park, are not necessary and, in fact, INDULGENT. Within a 5 mile radius of Mount Prospect, there are 9 or more public golf courses and driving ranges already in existence. One more driving range will only introduce new costs to the city and increased traffic on Central Avenue. It is doubtful that this requested zoning change is motivated toward meeting gaps in the community recreational NEEDS of the Mount Prospect resident community. The Melas Park back park (water retention area) is a fantastic open area for sledding, fitness training, frisbee play, etc which is not disruptive to any of the other sporting complex activities. As suburbs have grown over the years, these type of open areas are much more rare than driving ranges. We strongly recommend that the Zoning Board reject the proposed changes presented in Case PZ- 15 -11. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Lynn Berry and Matt Sessa - 209 East Hiawatha Trail, Mount Prospect This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http:/ /www.messagelabs.comJemail Andrade, Consuelo From: Ron Cohen [ Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:43 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: Golf range Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged .lust what - we need another driving range within a five mile radius. What are you people thinking? We have a beautiful open space for people to use in many different ways. Why are you catering to only people who golf and expect everyone to foot the bill. Obviously there must be better ways to spend our tax dollars, maybe try saving the money and lower our property taxes or better yet put it towards your underfunded over priced pensions! Just a thought, maybe the golfers of Mt Prospect will cover your shortfall. Let common sense prevail and leave some open spaces for everyone to enjoy! This email has been scanned by the Messagel_abs Email Security System. For more information please visit htto://www.messagelabs.com /email Andrade., Consuelo From: litnuge Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 4:21 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: Melas Park Driving Range Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Melas Park has is a wonderful place that services its residents, both of Mt. Prospect and Arlington Heights, in many 'different capacities. I have heard of the plans to construct a golf driving range in an area which I have come to cherish for many different reasons. It is the place I am able to meet with wonderful people who share the same love of animals. We have so many parks for our children, many of which my own children used as they were growing up. We who occupy this space for one hour a day, reverence the land as we do our animals. We are respectful and appreciative of the time we have enjoyed there. Please reconsider your decision and let us work together to maintain Melas Park in its present form. I am convinced this will satisfy the majority of the people who enjoy this great piece of land. Thank you, Maxine Nugent Arlington Heights This email has been se med by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http : / /www.messagelabs.com/email Andrade, Consuelo From: Melanie Schikore [ Sent: Friday, June 17, 2511 4:55 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: Melas retention area Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hello, I'd like to weigh in on the proposed change of use for the retention area at Melas Park. I am a resident of Arlington Heights since 1992 and my family, including three kids and a dog, has enjoyed Melas for the purposes of softball, soccer, sledding, dog walking, and more. The retention area is especially important to us because there are so very few green spaces in the suburbs which are free from structured activities and allow for frisbee, dog play, sledding, exercise, etc. Recently I heard that the park district wants to change the use to create a driving range. I would be very disappointed to see this happen and I think many other AH and Mt. Prospect residents would be too. It changes an area that is currently used by many for various purposes into something that only benefits a minority of residents, excludes all the others, and is completely redundant given that there are already numerous driving ranges in the area. Furthermore, it accentuates a certain economic disparity since jogging, exercise, frisbee, dog walking and sledding are all free activities, but golfing requires a certain investment even if only in golf clubs. It's so important that the park district and the village maintain a stance that amenities that are provided through taxes need to be for all of the general public, not a select few. I sincerely hope you will reconsider this idea and conclude at a minimum that this is something that residents need to weigh in on since they are the ones who will be affected. Melanie Schikore This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http / /www.messa ems _com/email i An drade, Consuelo From: Cooney, Bill Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 2:32 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo; Simmons, Brian Subject: FW: NO TO PZ 15 -11 Driving Range for Melas Park Water Retention Area Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged FYI From: Wilks, Irvana K. Sent: Monday, June 20, 20112:14 PM To: Janonis, Mike; Jarosz, Doreen; Angell, Lisa; Cooney, Bill; Strahl, Dave Subject: FW: NO TO PZ 15 -11 - Driving Range for Melas Park Water Retention Area Received this about the driving range for Melas Park -- Irvana K. Wilks -- Mayor -- Mount Prospect From: Stan Hillstrom [ Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 11:38 AM To: Wilks, Irvana K.; pwhoefert0)comcast.net arlene.ju,racek gmail com kornmt pros ct comcast.net; matuszak.trustee sbc lobal.net; s olitm mail.com; maznawata comcast.net Subject: Fwd: NO TO PZ 15 -11 - Driving Range for Melas Park Water Retention Area I have sent this note to the village already - thought I would forward to the board as well. Regards, Stan From: Stan Hillstrom < Date: June 20, 2011 11:26:39 AM CDT To: io mount ros ect.or Subject: NO TO PZ 15 -11 - Driving Range for Melas Park Water Retention Area I would like to voice my opinion on PZ 15 -11, the driving range proposal for the Melas Park water retention area. I'm strongly opposed to this proposal for several reasons: 1. This area already has other uses - Sledding area for kids - Exercise area for people who run hills or just want to walk 2. The required lighting and nets will be an eyesore. 3. How many more driving ranges do we need in the area? I don't play golf and I know_ that the park district already has a.driving range ( http: / /www.rtpd.org /Golf /miniGolf.html I can also think of three other driving ranges that are a short drive away (two in Des Plaines and one in Northbrook). I also think that the following questions should be answered: 1. Who will pay for the change and how will it be funded? I hope there will not be won't be any additional costs for the residents to bear - as a reminder, we are in the middle of a huge recession. 2. Have the families that will be affected by the new lighting etc. been contacted for their input? I can't imagine that most would be happy with the proposed change. 3. Why are we looking to add additional maintenance when we cannot currently maintain Kopp field. My daughter plays soccer there and the field is a mess most days. Put your resources to work to improve what you have before taking on more responsibilities. Stan Hillstrom 8 South George Street Mount Prospect If you have questions please call me 847 873 0305 Regards, Sta n This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http : / /www.messagelabs.com/email 2 Ms. Consuelo Andrade Mount Prospect Village Hail June 23, 2011 50 S. Emerson Street Mt. Prospect, IL. 60056 Dear Ms. Andrade, My name is Keith Dinsmore and I have coached Recreational Soccer for the Mount Prospect Park District for five years in both Fall and Spring season leagues. I am writing to express my support for lighting at Melas Park. Melas Park has beautiful fields for soccer and it would be a major addition to have the facility open to us for nighttime games_ This would also lend a greater degree of flexibility for scheduling in all seasons. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly Keith Dinsmore 1405 East Central Road #21513 Arlington Heights, IL 60005 Andrade, Consuelo From: Nancy Stenzel [ Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2091 3:02 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: Melas Park- retention area I live at 904 Harvest Lane in Mt. Prospect, l use the park for exercise and relaxation with my family and grandchildren. love the peacefulness and beauty of this park. Please do not put a driving range in this area, we have existing driving ranges in the village. Please leave this open space for those who enjoy peace and quiet. Thank you, Nancy Stenzel. This email has been scanned by the Message Labs Email Security System. For more information please visit http: / /www.messagelabs.com /email Andrade, Consuelo From: greg stenzel [ Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:08 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: proposed driving range at Melas I would prefer to see the retention basin be used for year round activities like athletic training, softball, and winter sledding activities, rather than just limit the availability to golfers. There are driving ranges at River Trails and Golf and Rand and I have never seen them close to capacity. Greg Stenzel This email has been scanned by the Messagel-abs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com e mail Andrade, Consuelo From: Michael Kraak [ Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 10:05 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: melas driving range Im mailing you to express my opposition to a variance that would enable a golf driving range at melas park. There is currently 5 driving ranges within a 5 mile or so radius from melas. Another range is not needed,nor will it be a money maker for the town . The area should remain open to all residents, not just golfers, but winter sledding, athletic fitness training and remote controlled toy planes and cars. A driving range would also eliminate the bike /run/walking path around the pond for fear of errant balls. Vote No! sincerely, mike kraak This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit htt : / /Www.messa elabs.com/email ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE (LIGHTED FOOTBALL /SOCCER FIELDS AND LIGHTED DRIVING RANGE) AND VARIATIONS (HEIGHT OF LIGHT STANDARDS AND BUILDING SETBACK) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1500 WEST CENTRAL ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Mt. Prospect Park District (Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Conditional Use for lighted football /soccer fields and lighted driving range, and Variations to decrease the building setbacks and increase the height of light standards for property located at 1500 West Central Road, Melas Park, (Property) and legally described as: Lot "G" and "H" in Kirchoffs subdivision in the Section 33, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 22, 1917 as Document No. 6117296. Property Index Number: 03 -33- 300 - 077,- 076, -056 and 03 -33- 408 -004; and WHEREAS, the "Petitioner" seeks (1) a Conditional Use to allow lighted football /soccer fields and a lighted driving range (2) a Variation to increase the height of light standards from thirty feet (30') to seventy feet (70') and 3) a Variation to reduce the building setback from fifteen feet (15') to four feet (4') along the west property line as shown on the plans; attached as Exhibit "A1 -A5, "; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use and Variations being the subject of PZ -15 -11 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28 day of July, 2011, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 8 th day of June, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect in support of the requests being the subject of PZ- 15 -11; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the requests and have determined that the requests meet the standards of the Village and that the granting of (1) a Conditional Use to allow lighted football /soccer fields and a lighted driving range (2) a Variation to increase the height of light standards from thirty feet (30') to seventy feet (70') and 3) a Variation to reduce the building setback from fifteen feet (15') to four feet (4') along the west property line as shown on the attached plans as Exhibit "A1 -A5," would be in the best interest of the Village; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant (1) a Conditional Use to allow lighted football /soccer fields and lighted driving range, 2) a Variation to increase the height of light standards from thirty feet (30') to seventy feet (70') and 3) a Variation to reduce the building setback from fifteen feet (15') to four feet (4') along the west property line a copy of which is attached and made a part of as Exhibit "Al — A5." SECTION THREE Approval of the Conditional Use and Variations is subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. The primary light standards are turned off at 9:00 p.m.; and Page 2/2 PZ -15 -11 2. The secondary light standards are turned off at 9:30 p.m. SECTION FOUR The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 2011. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H: \CLK0\WIN \0RDINANCE2 \C USE,VAR- pz15- 11.doc W .. H �O o i—J N d r ~ oy a �� ro p G CO � FI N V E H v, � c NENRV 5fl T A l l i Ir CENTRAL a r J r Z ' i' 8 i 1 �4 G�0 CT 1. Poletop Luminaire Assembly 2. Wire Harness — (inside Pole) Typical Light— Structure Green System Detail — 4 Luminaires Green Generation Luminaire r Removable Pots Cap 3, Electrical Components — Enclosure -Ballasts - Smort Control - Fusing -Primary Landing Lugs -One Disconnect Per Circuit Per Light- Structure Grsen - Grounding Lug 4. Galvanized Steel Pole — (1, 2, 3 or 4 Sections) 5. Precast Concrete Base Ce tri(ugalip Sun Prestressed Attachment Bracket X -4 1/2' [102 M] C - Jacking Ear *10'-0' [3048mm] s2' -0• P [b10mrn] L Ground Level Customer /Contractor supplies: - Grounding rod and connection Fm Concrete Backfill to system grounding lug - Concrete backr� - Underground wiring -Servi entrance Wire Access Hub Handhole with Grounding Lug Access Lifting Bar Hob Above Ground Access Hole Underground Access Note n P Grounding Rod r & Connection FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW System FIELD SIDE Notes: 1. This drawing is not to scale. 2. ' This dimension for reference only. Variances may occur depending on steel pole tolerances, concrete tolerances, galvanizing thickness, hole depth accuracy. 3. Yusco provides a terse installation bar, an installation level modified for taper, and installation wedges. 4. Provisions for auxiriary equipment such as speaker or security lighting can be incorporated 5. Copyright 1991, 2007, 2008 Musco lighting. Patents issued and pending. LSC -04 i. Poletop Luminaire Assembly 2. Wire Harness — (Inside Pole) Typical Light— Structure Green" System Detail — 5 Luminaires Green Generatione Luminoiro _� Remawble Pole Cap 3. Electrical Components — Enclosure —Ballasts — Capacitors —Smart Lam p® Control — Fusing —Primary Landing Lugs —one Disconnect Per Circuit Per Light— Structure GreenTMSystem — Grounding Lug 4, Galvanized Steel Pole — (1, 2, 3 or 4 Sections) Attachment Bracket 4' -4 1/2` [1334mm] -Jacking Ear r1t1' -0' [3048mm] r2. -0' L [til0mmJ Ground Level Customer/Contractor supp5es: — Grounding rod and connection Concrete Boakfill to system grounding hug Concrete bockrtl Wire Access Hub Handhole with Grounding Lug Access Lifting Bar Hole Above Ground Access We Underground Access Hole 5. Precast Concrete Bose = lJndergratnd wiring d � Centrifugally Spun, Prestressed —Service entrance Grounding Rod FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW & Connection System FIELD SIDE Motes: 1. 2. This drawing is not to scale. • This dimension for reference only. Variances may occur depending on steel Pate tolerances, concrete tolerances, ganamfAng thickness, hole depth accuracy. 3. Musco provides a base installation bar, an installation level modified for toper, and installation wedges. 4. Provisions for auxiliary equipment such as speaker or security lighting con be incorporated. LSG -05 5. Copyright 1997, 2007, 2008 Muss 1.10ting. Patents issued and pending. A� Typical Light — Structure Green' System Detail — 6 Luminaires Green Generation'® LuminairE _ —Removable Pole Cop 1. Poletop Lumina Assembly 2. Wire Harness (Inside Pale) J. Electrical Comi Enclosure - Ballasts - Copocitors -smart Lome Coni - fusing - Primary Landing Li -One Disconnect Pe Per Light-Structure - Grounding Lug 4. Galvanized Ste+ f (1, 2, 3 or 4 Sectioi 5. Precast Concrf Centrifu ally Satin Pr Attachment Bracket 4' -4 112' Ef334mmJ C (3048mmJ 1 2'-0' Etil0mmJ CustomerjControctor supplies: - Grounding rod and connection 71 to system grounding tug ^Concrete backfitl - Underground wiring - Service entrance Wire Access Hub Handhole with Grounding Lug Access Lifting Bar Hole Above Ground Access Hole Underground Access Hole I 9 P --- - - - r Grounding Rod FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW sysem ecGon FIELD SIDE Notes: 1. This drawing is not to scale. 2. • This dimension for reference only. Varian= may occur depending an steel pole tolerances, concrete tolerances, galvanizing thickness, hole depth accuracy. 3. Musce provides a base instollation bar, an installation level modified for toper, and installation wedges. k Provisions for auxifwry equoment such as speaker or security lighting can be incorporated. 5. Copyright 1991, 2007, 2008 Musco Lighting. Patents issued and pending. LSG -06 z H O CrJ tj 11 9 'Aa! a[ a� 44 1 SA 4216 E L W p ;m t t r a HUM M I