HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/09/1998 COW minutes MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JUNE 9, 1998
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:51 p.m. Present at the meeting were:
Trustees George Clowes, Timothy. Corcoran, Paur Hoefert, Richard Lohrstorfer,
Daniel Nocchi and Irvana Wilks. Staff present included Assistant Village Manager
David Strahl, Finance Director Brian Caputo, Public Works Director Glen Andler,
Deputy Public Works Director Sean Dorsey and Village Engineer Jeff Wulbecker.
I1. MINUTES
Approval of Minutes of May 26, 1998. Motion made by Trustee Wilks and
Seconded by Trustee Clowes to approve the Minutes. Trustee Hoefert requested
a change in the Minutes reflecting that Trustee Corcoran and Trustee Hoefert left
the meeting for approximately one-hour beginning at 8:50 p.m. and requested the
change be made to the Minutes. Minute was approved unanimously with the
change to the Minutes.
III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
Anna Woznlak of 181t Seminole Lane spoke. She stated that she was present
at the meeting this evening to request that the Village Board not install a mid-block
sidewalk connection near her home. She stated that crosswalks should be installed
and maintained at full intersections and encouraging people to cross at mid-block
would create a safety problem. She also felt that persons exiting the ddveway near
this sidewalk would also put pedestrians at risk. She presented a Petition to the
Village Board to consider with approximately 63 names requesting that the five feet
'of sidewalk not be installed at this location.
A resident at 1807 Seminole Lane spoke. ,?J3e stated that she supported installing
the sidewalk and puffing the curb cut at this location due to the pedestrian flow in
the area. She stated, that she, too, would encourage people to cross at
intersections but the sidewalk contemplated at this location does not create a safety
hazard as far as she can tell. She stated the sidewalk in question is 30 feet from
the ddveway from 1811 Seminole and, therefore, she feels that people utilizing the
driveway will not put pedestrians at dsk. She stated she supports the ADA
f'"' regulations for full access. She stated 'she had talked to other residents in the
general area specifically on Maya who have had mid-block curb cuts and have
experienced no issues with pedestrians cutting through their yards.
Mrs. Orlawskl of 1824 Aztec stated that she disagreed with many of the ~
statements from the previous speaker and would request the sidewalk not be'
installed.
Chester Gall of 1807 Seminole stated that he does not see a problem with kids
cutting through the yard and the installation of this sidewalk would not encourage ~
such cut-through activity. :
General comments from Village Board members included the following items:
A number of Trustees acknowledged the fact that this does appear to be a safety
issue but the installation of a sidewalk does not necessarily appear to compromise
safety. The installation would meet ADA requirements as necessary by Federal
regulations. There was also some discussion about limiting the number of curb cuts
due to the traffic volume on Seminole.
Consensus of the Village Board was to support making the sidewalk
connection as recommended by staff and previously-approved engineering
plans whereby the sidewalk would be connected between the street and
existing sidewalk running parallel to Seminole Lane,
Tom Neitzke, 17 South Maple, spoke. He stated that he is a 47-year resident of ~
the community and wanted to bring forward some comments concerning clowntown
redevelopment. He stated that he is against the Downtown Redevelopment Project
due to its apparent disregard of historical businesses within the downtown and the
focus on razing buildings on entire blocks. He stated the oldest building in the
community is slated for removal and the "city leaders" are ignoring existing history
in the community by considering this removal. He stated that someone has come
forward to save the building but the Village does not want to help. He stated that
historical buildings have value to the community and history must be preserved. He
stated he has taken ~ssue with some of the comments directed at the existing
downtown business owners and would recommend every effort be made to build
around existing historical buildings because such buildings are an attraction unto
themselves. He stated he has a concern about the eight-story condominium
building on his block because the condominium buildings have no commemial retail
included in the .proposal. He felt that commercial development should be
encouraged along Wille and questioned why a third condominium building should
be built instead of commercial at this time. The developer who has been working -~.
with the Village states that commercial does not work along Wille, however, he has
a different opinion and feels that it will. He stated the development allows for the
developer to own all the property ~and existing businesses who are displaced will not
be able to afford the new rents to return to the downtown once the development is
completed. ,-.,,.
2
Scott Saewart, Prospect Heights resident, spoke. He stated that he is answering
the call for preserving the Keyser building at the comer of Northwest Highway and
Route 83. He stated that he has interest in the building and is willing to relocate the
building to the designated historic row of buildings along the north side of Busse
Avenue. However, he needs assistance from Mount Prospect to find a piece of
property to relocate the building to. He would be willing to put the building on Busse
and perform extensive renovations, however, no one wants to sell property within
the TIF for a location for the relocated building. He stated he is requesting citizens
come forward to support his effort in preserving this building. He stated that he has
talked to the Village Manager and was informed that it was his responsibility to find
the necessary property to relocate the building.
Dan Thompkins, a Des Plaines resident, spoke. He stated that he is concerned
about the comments of Village representatives who are threatening businesses with
condemnation and ignoring preservation of historic buildings. He stated that the
Village should not condemn property to provide property for private development.
He thought more people would be against the project if they were aware of how the
Village was going about the discussions with area property owners.
Mike Reese, Arlington Heights resident and owner of the business at 1 $ West
Busse spoke. He stated that he has been in business for 14 years and wanted to
be in downtown Mount Prospect, therefore, he opened his business at its existing
location. He stated that he has run into problems with the Village in the past
including sign issues and attempts at generating exposure through installation of a
kiosk for the businesses on Busse Avenue. He stated that he is concerned that the
Village appears to be heading towards a necessity of razing the entire downtown.
He said the Village is not working with existing businesses enough and felt it was
important the Village make every effort to keep the identity of the downtown intact.
Mayor Farley thanked the speakers for their input and input has been encouraged
through the discussion phase of the project. He stated that he has a desire to
preserve businesses and historical buildings if possible and stated that decisions
are not being made in a vacuum ......
Trustee Hoefert stated that downtown redevelopment has been discussed for 20-
25 years, therefore, the concern of moving too quickly does not necessarily ring true
in this instance. He stated discussion continues as to what the development will
actually be. He stated everyone has agreed that there is a need for some type of
economic vitality in the downtown. He stated that he, too, would like to preserve the
building that Mr. Saewart is interested in if a location can be found for the building.
He stated efforts would be undertaken to bring parties together with representatives
from the Village and businesses.
3
TrUstee NocChi stated the Ad Hoc Committee provided numerous opportunities for
indiViduals to speak. He stated that this i~ the first instance of negative comments
Concerning downtown redevelopment that he is aWa~e of.
Trustee Clowes thanked th~~ non-residents of Mount Prospect for their input. He
stated that the TIF Area was expanded and originally called for homes to be
' ' ' demolished as part of redevelopment. He stated the plans are not set in Stone and
can be alteredl He woUld s * '
uggest conslderabon be' made to expand the TIF to
accommodate buildings of historical Value. ·
Trustee Wilks thanked the speakers for their comments and would be willing to
work wherever possible for historic preservation.
. Trustee C°rcoran thanked the speakers for their different p°intS°i view and stated
that no one likeS change but Change is necessary and needs to happen within the
downtown. He stated discussion has been underwaY for Over 20 years and it is not
his intention to force anyone Out of Mount Prospect. He'stat6d the plans have not
been completed yet and he would consider supporting a Orie-bl0ck area as an
historic area for preservation purposes.
Trustee Lohrstorfer stated that Committee members of the Ad J-loc Downtown
Redevelopment Committee dediCated a'great deal of time and encouraged input
wherever posSible. He stated that the Comm ttee had always been willing to listen
to various pointS of view and is somewhat surprised by the comments of the
speakers this evening.
IV. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR ~999-2003
Assistant Village Manager Strahl stated the establishment of the five-year Capital
Improvement Plan provides a comprehensive view of the Village'.s capital needs for
a consecutive rolling five-year window. This is the second Capital Improvement
Plan Which has been presented to the Village Board for COnSideration. The
proposed 1999-2003 CIP is generally comprised of projects which involve the
purchase or construction of long-lived tangible assets at a cost of $25,000 or more.
He stated a project inclusion in the ClP does not guarantee its 'funding or
accomplishment. The CIP is a planning document. As such, it is subject to change.
ClP will be reviewed and updated on an annual basis. The next ClP which will be
brOught before the Board in June of 1999 will cover the years from 2000-2004.
4
Special ~tjention should be given to projects requested for 1999. Those are the
projects Which would potentially be included in the Village's next annual operating
Budget. Although the.Village Board may decide not to fund a 1999 project request
included in the final 1999-2000 CIP, the ClP should serve as a pre-Budget for
capital items, The 1999 project requests included in the proposed CIP amount to
$10.4 million. Of this amount, $7.6 million or 73% is for the continuation of
established projects including $2.8 million for the accelerated Street Reconstruction
Program.
Finance Director Brian Caputo stated the total value of projects for the entire five-
year Capital Improvement Plan Budget is $52.9 million. He stated the pmjectsare
organized by Department and cross-referenced by funds so that the designated
funding source can easily be identified. He stated that the capital funding level is
currently adequate today with the previously approved transfers from the General
Fund but there still is a need to address long-term funding of capital and vehicle
replacement for future budget years. He stated the projects are listed as existing
or new for a better understanding of where the project sets in the approval process.
Trustee Hoefert stated that he felt the Village Hall rehabilitation or construction is
being counted twice in the CIP. He stated there is a figure for the existing Village
Hall of a little over $900,000 and an additional amount for reconstruction of a new
Village Hall and in reality, only one of these items will be undertaken, therefore,
there is no need to include both items.
Finance Director Caputo stated that he would revise the ClP to include only
funding for one option and clarify the item with the necessary verbiage to point to
the fact that only one option can be undertaken.
Trustee Hoefert stated that there has been funding set aside for Busse Road
improvements in 2002 and wanted to make the point that even with concurrence of
the CIP, it does not necessarily mean concurrence for any Busse Road work
scheduled for 2002. He felt the plan was critical for use in long-term planning.
Public Works Director Glen Andler provided a general overview of each item
under the Public Works section of the ClP
General 'comments from the Village Board members included the following items:
There was discussion concerning the status of the Hatlen Heights sanitary sewer
project. There was also a discussion concerning lift station repairs and the Senior
Center parking lot repair. A question was raised concerning the overall cost of the
lighting plan proposed for Route 83 at the time of the reconstruction. There was
also a question concerning the proposed Golf Road SPA work and the impact upon
Mount Prospect.
5
Public Works Director Glen Andler responded to the questions by stating that lift
station repairs are part of the operational budget since they are constantly
reoccurring. He stated the Senior Center parking lot reconstruction is wholly
dependent or~ pending downtown redevelopment decisions. He Stated the lighting
design for Route 83 has not yet been complected due to the date which has been
slated for Route 83 COnstruction; At this time, it is Premature to have a lighting plan
withOut the reCOnstruction design work completed. He also stated that the work on
the Golf Road SPA WOUld not impact Mount Prospect's budget because it was
reconstruction of the existing roadway with no widening of the rOad. The proposal
to realign the intersections with Des Plaines'' streets has been forwarded to IDOT
with a negative recommendation but since funding has not even been considered
for any of this work, the likelihood of this work being undertaken in t~ next five
years is quite remote.
Assistant Village Manager David Strahl provided a g~nerai overview to the
Village Board members concerning the two items that the Village Manager's office
is requesting: Those items include a document imaging system for electronic
maintenance of Village records and the installation of a high-Speed data connection
between Public Works Department and the Village Hall.
V. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
~ VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS ,::
~Trustee Hoefei-t requested that the Village d~;aff a letter to the Village of Elk Grove
outlining the Village's desire tO maintain an open dialOgUe with 'Elk Grove to keep
informed about any issues concerning the proposed Bears' Stadium construction
and its possible impact Upon Mount Prosl~ect residents. '~
· ~' Trustee Nocchi seconded the need for such correspondence to the Village of Elk
· Grove. '
~ General consensus of the Village Board was t° draft a letter for the signature
of all the members requesting the Village of Mount ProsPect be kept informed
of any developments regarding the proposed Bears Stadium so that any
impact could be minimized for Mount prOSpect residents,
Mayor Farley stated that Coffee with Council waslScheduled for June 13 at Village ~-'~'
Hall from 9:00 'a.m. until 11:00 a.m. · '
6
, Trustee Wilks wanted to thank Representative Carolyn Krause for her efforts in
' obtaining the funding for Melas Park improvements.
Trustee Clowes requested information be forwarded to the Village Board members
on any developments concerning the Area Code plan once information is obtained
from the ICC.
N3 LQUJ IMEt
Trustee Hoefert made a Motion to adjourn and was seconded by Trustee Nocchi.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:22 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
DAVID STRAHL
Assistant Village Manager
DS/rcc
I:\WIN~OFFICE\COWMIN\608 COW Minutes.doc
7