HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW Agenda Packet 09/25/2001 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday, September 25, 2001
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald L. Farley ~ '
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Paul Hoe[ert Trustee Irvana Wilks
Trustee Richard Lot~rstorfer Trustee Michael Zadel
II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 14, 2001
IlL CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IV. STATUS REPORT ON CONDITION OF VILLAGE STREETR
On an annual basis, the Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works provides an
overview of the general condition of roads within the corporate boundaries of the Village. This
includes not only municipally owned streets but also State and County roadways. The attached
report from Project Engineer Joel Michalik provides an overview of the progress of the Village's
Ten-Year Accelerated Road Improvement Program.
At the close of this year's construction season, the Village will have reached the halfway point of
the program. All streets requiring complete reconstruction will have been finished. The final five-
year period concentrates on an accelerated resurfacing program. At the midway point, staff is
pleased to state that the program is on schedule and under budget.
As part of the evening's discussion, staff will provide oral updates of significant State and County
road projects underway in the community, including Route 83 and Northwest Highway. Staff will
also provide an update on the progress of the Northwest Transit Corridor Project, which is
studying the feasibility of extending the CTA Blue Line (or some other form of mass transit) out to
the Schaumburg/Hoffman Estates area. Mount Prospect is a member of the Municipal Task
Force and has committed up to $10,000 toward the feasibility study costs.
Appropriate staff wilt be on hand to answer questions and to facilitate discussion.
NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE
OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD
CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 100 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT
PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064.
V. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
On an annual basis, the Department of Public Works provides the Village Board with an update of
progress on the Village's Comprehensive Flood Control Program. Since its inception in the early
90s, all major sanitary sewer flood contrel projects have been completed. Several overland flood
control projects have been completed or are under consideration. Finally, Weller Creek Bank
Stabilization Projects are currently underway.
Staff will also provide oral reports regarding the status of the Wedgewood Terrace Ovedand
Flood Control Project and the Army Corps of Engineers' Des Plaines River Flood Contrel Project.
Appropriate staff will also be available to answer questions and facilitate discussion.
VI. VEHICLE LICENSES - ANTIQUE VEHICLES
Per Village Code, all motor vehicles registered and/or housed within the corporate limits of the
Village are required to display a current vehicle sticker. Beyond that general rule, there are a
number of groups or individuals, which, by Resolution, are exempt from paying the annual fee.
These groups are in many cases members of volunteer Boards and Commissions, veterans of
foreign wars and disabled individuals.
The attached memorandum from Finance Director Douglas Ellsworth indicates that for some
time, owners of antique vehicles have also been treated as exempt from paying the vehicle
sticker fee. However, there is nothing contained in either the Village Code or the exemption
Resolution which denotes this status. According to Mr. Ellsworth, approximately 20 antique
vehicles were provided with free vehicle stickers.
it would be appropriate for the Village Board to address this current "loophole" by either
formalizing the exemption or making a determination that the owners of such vehicles must
purchase vehicle stickers for full price or, at a reduced rate, if that is the wish of the Village Board.
This information is provided for discussion purposes. Depending on the consensus and direction
of the Village Board, staff would draft the appropriate Ordinances and/or Resolutions to address
this issue. Appropriate staff will be available to answer questions and facilitate discussion.
VII. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
VIII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
H:\GEN\Cow~Agenda\092501 COW AgeNda.doc
MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AUGUST 14, 2001
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:34 p.m. by Mayor Gerald Farley. Present at
the meeting were: Trustees Paul Hoefert, Michaele Skowron, Irvana Wilks and
Michael Zadel. Absent from the meeting was Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer.
Trustee Timothy Comoran arrived at 7:40 p.m. Staff members present included
Village Manager Michael Janonis, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl, Public
Works Director Glen Andler, Human Services Director Nancy Morgan, Deputy
Human Services Director Jan Abernethy, Deputy Police Chief Ron Richardson,
Fire Chief Michael Figolah, Deputy Fire Chief John Malcolm, Finance Director
Doug EIIsworth and Community Development Director William Cooney.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of Minutes from July 24, 2001. Motion made by Trustee Hoefert and
Seconded by Trustee Skowron to approve the Minutes. Minutes were approved.
II1. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
Greg Peterson, 932 Boxwood, spoke. He provided pictures to the Board
highlighting some concerns regarding minors' violation of various Village
Ordinances including possible alcohol consumption in his area. He requested
Police assistance in addressing this issue.
IV. 2001 MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW
Village Manager Janonis stated that staff has provided a Mid-Year Budget
Review as part of the upcoming budgetary process for the last several years in
order to provide the Board a snapshot of where things stand prior to Budget
discussions. He stated that preliminary indications point to an approximate
deficit of $1 million for 2002 based on reduced revenues coming to the Village.
Finance Director Doug Ellsworth provided a general overview of the status of
various funds within the current Budget and anticipated changes to these funds
at the end of the year. He also provided an overview of various revenue sources
highlighting where revenue sources have significantly changed from initial
projections. He also provided an overview of individual Departments regarding
their projected Budget amounts for 2001.
General comments from the Village Board members included several questions
regarding the CDBG funding process and funding status. There were also some
questions regarding specific revenues and where those revenues stood and how
they were anticipated to be impacting the Budget next year. There were also
questions regarding Grant funds available for Weller Creek improvements.
2002 Budget Preview
Finance Director Doug EIIsworth stated that the Budget includes a Forecast
Budget for 2003 which also has a projected deficit for both years. He also
highlighted proposed new staff hires in the Fire Department and money for
temporary rental space for the relocation of the Human Services Department. He
stated that for this year's Budget, he expects expenditures to come in very close
to projections. He highlighted the projected revenue amounts for 2002 and an
expected deficit of approximately $1 million will be challenging to address. He
stated he expects to present the Budget proposal to the Board beginning on
October 5, with Hearings to follow.
General comments from the Village Board members included the following items:
There was a point made regarding the existing Village Budget is quite lean and
there is not a lot of room to cut without reducing programs and services.
Village Manager Janonis stated that he usually gets direction from the Village
Board regarding the projected Property Tax Levy that they are comfortable with.
He wanted to confirm what that amount is going into the final Budget preparation
activities before the actual Hearings themselves. He stated part of the
anticipated deficit reduction would include the deferral of capital items and the
use of General Fund balance for Human Services' expenses for relocation.
General consensus of the Village Board was to anticipate a 3.5% increase
in the Property Tax Levy for 2002.
V. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager Janonis stated thera will be no Committee of the Whole
meeting on August 28.
VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Trustee Hoefert stated that he is aware that there are several punch list items
for the completion of Route 83 and had requested if there had been any revised
timeframe on completion of those punch list items.
Public Works Director Glen Andler stated that he has followed up on the list to
IDOT and they have committed to getting things completed on a timely basis.
Trustee Zadel inquired about the status of the traffic light interconnection
throughout the downtown.
Public Works Director Andler stated that they are waiting the installation of
traffic controllers to complete the work.
Trustee Hoefert also inquired about the status of the investigation of whether a
mid-platform crossing could be installed at the train station.
He also wanted to thank everyone for the turn out at the Antique Car Show.
He also announced that there is a dedication of the General Store on August 21
and everyone is invited to participate in that.
Trustee Skowron wanted to personally thank Trustee Hoefert in his efforts
regarding the General Store project and stated that this is a good example of
community participation.
Closed Session
A Motion was made by Trustee Wilks and Seconded by Trustees Zadel to move
into Closed Session to discuss Property Acquisition.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
The meeting reconvened into Open Session at 9:04 p.m.
There was a short discussion regarding joint meetings with the Mount Prospect
Public Library.
The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
Respectfully s. ubmitted, ! / /~
DS/fcc Assistant Village Manager
H:\GEN\Cow~Minutes\081401 COW Minutes.doc
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER
DATE:
SUBJECT: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE
I have attached to this memo the 2001 Pavement Management Program report
prepared by Project Engineer Joel Michalik. This report is our annual update of our
Accelerated Street Improvement Program. It provides a current snapshot of the
condition of our streets. This year represents a significant milestone in our program,
the fifth and final year of the reconstruction phase.
I am providing copies for your inclusion of the report in the September 25 Committee of
: the Whole Agenda, Appropriate staff w be in attendance to p, resent the inform, ation..to
the Village Board.
X:\files\enginee~\pavement\O l\updatemm
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE ENGINEER JEFF WULBECKER
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2001
SUBJECT: 2001 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The Village of Mount Prospect has approximately 134 miles of residential streets that
are maintained by the Public Works Department. This maintenance responsibility
ranges from routine maintenance to major resurfacing and reconstruction projects.
Routine maintenance includes minor repairs such as crack sealing and patching.
Resurfacing includes the removal and replacement of the asphalt and the replacement
of badly deteriorated curbs. Reconstruction includes the complete removal and
replacement of the entire pavement structure, curbs and driveway aprons.
Reconstruction is necessary when the pavement has experienced an underlying base
failure. Under this condition it is no longer possible to replace only the surface.
The Village also maintains approximately 28 lane miles of State Highways. Our
responsibilities on these streets include crack sealing and patching. All costs incurred
for the materials and labor needed to perform these maintenance functions are
reimbursed to the Village by the Illinois Department of Transportation.
This year marks the end of the reconstruction phase of the 10-year accelerated
pavement program that was approved in 1996. Those streets that were designated for
reconstruction will be completed by the end of this construction season. Also during the
last 5 years those streets that were scheduled for resurfacing have been completed.
The remaining 5 years of the 10-year accelerated pavement program will consist of
completing the current backlog of those streets requiring resurfacing as well as streets
that are on-schedule for resurfacing. Attached is a table that details the miles of streets
that have been resurfaced and reconstructed as well as the associated costs to date.
Included in this report are year-by-year lists of streets that have been repaired and
those that are scheduled for repair in the upcoming 5 years. The streets included on
these lists are based on the pavement condition rating survey that was conducted by
Infrastructure Management Services, Inc, (IMS) during the spring and fall of 1995.
These lists are also based on field observations performed on an annual basis by the
Engineering Division.
At the back of this report are two large maps, One shows those streets that required
resurfacing or reconstruction at the start of the 10-year pavement management
program in 1997. The other map shows those streets that currently require resurfacing.
There are no more streets that will require complete reconstruction.
Page 2
2001 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
September 20, 2001
In addition to traditional resurfacing and reconstruction, I have also looked into the
following new products and techniques that are being used in the paving industry.
Saw and Seal Joints Trial
This procedure involves the saw cutting of the pavement surface at regular intervals
across the full pavement width to form a thin, straight "joint". This joint is then sealed
with a typical pavement crack sealing material. The purpose of this procedure is to
create a uniform, controlled line in the pavement. Over time, the combination of
shrinkage and expansion wants to distress the pavement surface. Normally these
cracks form an irregular shape and are difficult to repair. When a saw and seal joint
is present, the resulting crack will occur in a controlled area. This is analogous to the
joints that we all see in concrete sidewalks. This technique may prove to reduce the
amount of transverse cracking typically experienced in asphalt pavements, which are
exposed to varying weather conditions and numerous freeze-thaw cycles.
In 1997, pavement joints were installed in the following streets immediately after they
were resurfaced:
· Catalpa Lane (Busse Road to Lavergne Dr.)
· Magnolia Lane (Busse Road to Lavergne Dr.)
· Tamarack Drive (Willow Lane to Pheasant Lane)
· Lavergne Drive (Busse Road to Lavergne Dr.)
To date the installed joints and the sealer material have held up well with no sign of
deterioration. Likewise, there is no evidence of transverse cracking on the pavement
surface. These streets have experienced some longitudinal cracking, which is
normal after 4 years of service and exposure to the elements. All of our streets do
not experience transverse cracking and therefore saw and seal joints should not be
considered as a standard repair procedure. For those ~treets that have chronic
transverse cracking, I recommend that the saw and seal procedure be used when
the street is re-paved.
Sealcoating Trial
In 1998, a section of pavement, that was resurfaced in 1996, was sealcoated to
determine if this application can extend the pavement life. Isabella Street between
Elm Street and Owen Street was sealcoated and will be compared to Isabella
between Owen and Rand that was also resurfaced in 1996 but not sealcoated. At
this time, the sealcoating material has experienced 3 years of weather changes,
traffic and maintenance. The sealcoating material is wearing off and its effectiveness
is now limited. This wear is not unusual considering traffic, street sweeping, snow
plowing and leaf pickup. All these events are quite abrasive to the relatively thin
sealcoat material. At this time I do not see a difference in the sealcoated and non-
sealcoated sections of Isabella Street. It is my opinion that this is not a cost effective
method for maintaining local asphalt roads.
Page 3
2001 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
September 20, 2001
Microsurfacing
Traditional asphalt consists of graded stone of various sizes and an asphaltic binder
(the black gooey stuff). Microsurfacing is a relatively new paving technique that uses
smaller stone, an asphaltic binder and additives such as polymers and extenders
which allow the asphalt to be installed in a thin layer. Special equipment is also
needed. Microsurfacing typically involves a 3/4 inch overlay with no removal
(grinding) of the existing surface. While this technique has not been tried in the
Village, I have attended several seminars that discussed this method of repairing
pavements. I have also discussed this technique with the Illinois Department of
Transportation, since some mumc~palities have used Motor Fuel Tax money to
microsurface local streets.
Based on all this I can report the following:
· Microsurfacing is most effective on streets that have experienced a uniform
'wearing-out'.
· Microsurfacing is not effective on streets that have numerous cracks.
· Realistically this method can only be used once before grinding is necessary,
since an additional 3/4" overlay would place the surface too high above the
concrete gutter.
· While the cost to microsurface is cheaper than grinding and resurfacing (about
one-half), the life of the resulting surface is likewise one-half that of traditional
grinding and resurfacing. There is no real savings and repairs would have to be
performed twice as often.
Based on this I do not feel that microsurfacing is an appropriate method for the
repairing of Village streets.
White Topping
This is a new technique that involves applying a thin specialized concrete product
over deteriorated asphalt. It is primarily used in areas where chronic rutting is a
problem. Rutting is the displacement of asphalt, which creates channels in the
wheelpath. It is caused by high, continuous traffic volumes or heavy loads. Our
local streets do not experience premature rutting. Also, the life cycle cost for white
topping is greater than our current resurfacing methods. In addition, white topping,
like concrete, results in a surface that produces a noisy ride that is not suited for our
local streets.
age 4
2001 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
September 20, 2001
SuperPave
The SuperPave system was developed by the Strategic Highway Research Program
(SHRP). It was developed to give engineers and contractors a better method for
designing asphalt pavements that will perform better under extremes of temperature
and heavy traffic loads. It provides for the selection of materials that best suit
environmental (weather) and traffic conditions that occur at the location where the
pavement will be installed. The SuperPave in-plant and in-field testing procedures
more closely mimic these actual conditions and therefore give a better indication of
how the materials will actually perform, These new methods are the results of 5
years of intensive research and testing by the SHRP. The Federal Highway
Administration has now assumed responsibility for further development and
validation of the SuperPave specifications and test procedures and has initiated a
national program to encourage the adoption of the SuperPave system at the state
level. The implementation of the SuperPave system has taken some time since
contractors were required to purchase new testing equipment. In addition contractor
personnel and private testing consultants had to be trained to operate the new
equipment and understand the new procedures, IDOT has fully adopted the
SuperPave system for state projects and has now directed local agencies to
implement the SuperPave system on all local projects. Starting next year I will
specify asphalt mixtures that meet current SuperPave specifications with respect to
both design and testing. All IDOT qualified contractors now have the equipment and
personnel that will allow them to fully implement SuperPave mixes for local road
pavements. SuperPave is the new industry standard and it will provide better
pavements. I do not anticipate an increase in the cost for asphalt under the
SuperPave system since the new equipment and training costs will be spread over
the contractors entire operations for years to come.
I will continue to provide updates on our experimental streets. Likewise, I will continue
to investigate new and alternative measures for pavement repair and will report on their
merits.
~__.~el Michalik
X:\FILES\EN GINEER\PAVEME NT~OI\Report. DOC
10-Year Pavement Management Program
To-Date Summary
September, 2001
Resurfacing Program
Planned (1) Planned Actua~ Awarded Actual Actual
Resurfacing Budget Resurfacing Cost Cost Cost/Mile
(miles) (miles)
1997 4.50 $900,000 4.31 $733,821 $689,000 $159,775
1997-CDBG (2) 0.79 $166,871 $121,000 $153,165
1998 4.50 $930,000 4.46 $813,725 $786,280 $176,453
1999 4.50 $962,000 5.85 $989,887 $974,375 $166,559
2000 4.37 $1,000,000 5.61 $999,974 $824,840 $147,084
2001 (6) 3.69 $1,155,000 (5) $1,154,000 (5) (5)
Total 21.56 $4,947,000 $4,858,278
Reconstruction Program
Planned (1) Planned Actual Awarded Actual Actual
Reconstruction Budget Reconstruction Cost Cost Cost/Mile
(miles) (miles)
1997 (3) 2.40 $2,300,000 2.66 $21139,773 $1,884,000 $708,261
1998 2.70 $2,666,000 3.18 $2,144,234 $2,028,720 $637,788
1999 (4) 2.70 $2,759,000 2.87 $2,673,663 $2,200,000 $767,239
2000 4~04 $2,929,717 3.98 $2,856,941 $2,469,960 $620,575
2001 (5) 3.34 $3,556,917 (5) $3,456,917 (5) (5)
Total 15.18 $14,211,634 $13,271,528
Notes:
(1) "Planned" figures are from the Board Approved 10-Year Pavement Management Program
(2) Community Development Block Grant
(3) Included sewer trench replacement / street reconstruction (Elm Street)
(4) Included sewer trench replacement/street reconstruction (Henry Street)
(5) Project currently under construction
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 5-Year Reconstruction Program (1997 - 2001)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LEN.
1997-Actual
ALTNEA DR TANO LN WOOD LN 750
THAYER ST WOLF RD YATES LN 475
SITKA LN TANO LN ALTHEA DR 1040
ASPEN DR AZTEC LN MA YA LA 1205
TANO LN COLUMBINE DR BURNING BUSH LN 1375
LAUREL DR AZTEC LN MAYA LN 1275
BARBERRY LN SYCAMORE LN GREENWOOD LN 2005
AZALEA LN BURNING BUSH LN BASSWOOD LN 1270
BUCK'rHORN DR MAYA LN ROSETREE LN 885
PALM DR CHURCH RD NA-WA;TA AV 390
CHURCH RD PALM DR WILLOW LN 695
COUNCIL TR HILUSIAV SEE-GWUNAV 1590
ELMHURST AVE LINCOLN ST MILBURN AVE 560
ELM ST BUSSEAVE EVERGREENAVE 530
L 14,o42t
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 5-Year Reconstruction Program (1997 - 2001)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-ynxls
STREET FROM TO LEN.
1998.Actual
WISTORIA CT COLUMBINE DR CUL-DE-SAC 255
LINBEN LN SYCAMORE LN END PAVMENT 660
LARCH DR COLUMBINE DR MA YA LN 1050
ALMONB CT COLUMBINE DR CUL-DE-SAC 240
ARBYCE LN WESTGATE RD MARCELLA RD 480
ASH DR CYPRESS DR CHURCH RD 565
INDIGO CT INDIGO LN CUL-DE-SAC 240
INDIGO DR CREE LN MANDEL LN 2050
MANDEL LN CAMP MCDONALD RD WOOD LN 375
IRONWOOD DR SYCAMORE LN END PA VMENT 640
AP, ALIA BR MAYA LN AZTEC LN 1225
CARIB LN INDIGO LN COLUMBINE DR 1265
AZTEC LN ANDOA LN ARAILA DR 775
WILLOW LN NA-WA- TA A V CHURCH RD 420
WOOD LN MANDEL LN BURNING BUSH LN 2230
NA-WA-TA AV GOLF RD WILLOW LN 815
TANO LN INDIGO LN COLUMBINE DR 1075
COLUMBINE DR CAMP MCDONALD RD LARCH DR 260
LANCASTER AV 660 FT ASH DR 340
QUINCE CT QUINCE LN CUL-DE-SAC 220
LANCASTER AVE LONNQUISTBLVD GOLFRD 1615
I 16,7,51
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 5-Year Reconstruction Program (1997 - 2001)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LEN.
'1999.Actual
LAWRENCE LN LOIS CT END PVMT 305
COLUMBINE DR CREE LN CAMP MCDONALD R 2270
BASSWOOB LN BURNING BUSH LN QUINCE LN 1275
WAVERLY AV GOLF RD LONNQUIST BV 1560
ANDOA LN SEMINIOL LN LARCH DR 750
· LARCH DR MAYA LN ANDOA LN 1150
AZALEA PL BASSWOOD LN CUL-DE-SAC 560
MOHAWK LN LARCH DR CITY LIMIT 350
CATINO CT CARDINAL LN ARDYCE LN 750
LOUIS ST GOLF RD SUNSET RD 810
LAWRENCE LN MEIER RD LOIS CT 810
GREENACRES LN WA VERL Y A V ROBERT DR 1110
BASSWOOD LN QUINCE LN EUCLID AV 525
HENRY ST LANCASTER KENILWORTH 1150
PROSPECT AV LANCASTER KENILWORTH 1120
PROSPECT ALLEY LANCASTER WAVERLY 400
OAK AV GREGORY ST ISABELLA ST 810
GEORGE ST BUSSE AV LINCOLN ST 2000
[ 17,7051
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 5-Year Reconstruction Program (1997 - 2001)
08/31/2001 Pavement\l 0-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LEN.
2000-Actual
HELENA AV LINCOLN ST HAVEN ST 665
GREGORY ST S TRA TTON LN MARCELLA RD 325
BURNING BUSH LN EUCLIDAV KENSINGTON RD 2770
HOPI LN MOKI LN RIVER RD 260
PRENDERGAST LN MEIER RD NOAH TE 630
THAYER ST STRA TTON LN MARCELLA RD 330
SUNSET RD END PVMT ROBERT DR 150
ROBERT DR GOLF RD LONNOUIST BV 1580
QUINCE LN BASSWOOD LN HOPI LN 1210
THAYER ST MARCELLA RD WESTGA TE RD 480
HOPI LH QUINCE LN BURNING BUSH LN 1050
ST CECILIA DR PRENDERGASTLN LAWRENCE LN 625
LINCOLN ST MEIERRD DOUGLASAV 1270
SIOUX LN HOPILN CUL-DE-SAC 190
LAMA LN CHINKAPIN OAK R PVMT CHANGE 1040
EMMERSON LN STEVENSON LN WOLF RD 925
CREE LN INDIGO DR PEACHTREE LN 11 O0
PEACHTREE LN CORKTREE LN CREE LN 960
PEARTREE LN CORKTREE LN CREE LN 855
EDWARD ST CENTRAL RD NW HIGHWAY 2700
OWEN ST CENTRAL RD MILBURN A V 1900
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed §-Year Reconstruction Program (1997 -2001)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LEN.
2001
CARBOY RD CUL DE SAC CUL DE SAC 1065
DB DRIVE ELMHURST RD CUL DE SAC 505
MEIER RD PRENDERGAST LN LAWERENCE LN 630
NORDIC RD ALGONQUIN RD CARBOY RD 930
SYCAMORE LN EUCLIDAVE IRONWOODDR 1880
MARCELLA RD GREGORY ST CENTRAL RD 2575
NEWBERRY LN KENSINGTON RD IRONWOOD DR 590
ROBERT DR GOLF RD GLENN LN 150
GLENN LN ROBERTDR WAVERLYAVE 920
HOPI LN BURNING BUSH MOKI LN 1620
PIN OAK DR LAMA LN RIVER RD 775
CHINKAPIN OAK DR RIVER RD LAMA LN 645
SLAWIN CT BUS CENTER DR CUL-DE..SAC 450
EMERSON ST LINCOLN ST PROSPECT A V 1110
MILBURN AV MAIN ST EMERSON ST 330
LONNQUIBT BV SEE GWUN RT. 83 2380
LONNQUIST BV RT 83 BYRON CT 330
GREGORY ST DALEAV FORESTAV 1320
PRAIRIE AV WHITE OAK ST END OF PA VEMENT 700
BUBSE AV W/O ELMHURST A V ELMNURST A V 200
HARVEST LN (AT BUSINESS CENTER DR) 100
[ 10,2061
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997- 2006)
08/31/2001 Pavement\l 0-yr.xks
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
1997-Actual
WOODVlEW DR MURA LN RIVER RD 1,220
BUS CENTER DR WHEELING RD RAND RD 1,550
WINTERGREEN AY PARK DR MURA LN 1,050
HEMLOCK LN BARBERRYLN EUCLIDAV 505
HEMLOCK LN KENSINGTON RD BARBERRY LN 2,125
WHEELING RD KENSINGTON RD BUS CENTER DR 1,700
ISABELLA ST ELMHURST AV MAIN ST 1,315
BONITA AV HA TLEN A V BUSSE RD 1,805
$HABONEE TR EMERSON ST MAPLE ST 380
MOEHLING DR MAPLE ST END PVMT 310
BRIARWOOD DR BRIARWOOD DR E LYNN CT 3,075
BRIARWOOD DR E. LYNN CT BRIARWOOD DR 2,220
LYNN CT BRIARWOOD DR CUL DE SAC 550
SUNSET RD WILLIAM ST EDWARD ST 820
MAPLE ST COUNCIL TR END PVMT 344
CATALPA LN TAMARACK DR BUSSE RD 1,000
TAMARACK DR WILLOWLN PHEASANTLN 890
LAVERGNE DR PHEASANT TR WILLOW LN 910
MAGNOLIA LN LA VERGNE DR BU$SE RD 1,000
COUNCIL TR ELMHURSTRD HI LUSIAV 800
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
08f31/2001 Pavement\10-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
1998-Actual
PIMA LI~ EUCLIDAV CUL-DE-SAC 275
SANTEE LN EUCL/DAV CUL-DE-SAC 235
IRONWOOD DR WESTGA TE RD SYCAMORE LN 1,255
DOGWOOD LN HEMLOCK LN JUNIPER LN 975
HENRY BT END PAVEMENT HORNER LN 485
GREENWOOD BR WHEELING RD HEMLOCK LN 1.945
LONNQUIST BV BUSSE RD CRESTWOOD A V 1.305
LONNQUIST BV BYRON CT MAIN ST 700
KlM AV HA TLEN A V CRESTWOOD LN '~.050
RUSTY BR CRESTWOOD LN BUSSE RD 1,450
RUSTY DR CAROL LN CRESTWOOD LN 695
I-OKA AV PROSPECT A V LINCOLN ST 2,235
SHA-BONEE TR WE GO TR HI-LUS/ AV 2.015
SHA-BONEE TR HI-LUSIAV ELMHURSTRD 800
MILBIJRN AV MTPROSPECTRD OWENST 2,315
GLENDALE LN BLACKHAWKDR LONNOUISTBV 815
bYRON CT LONNQUIST BV HIAWATHA AV 330
HIAWATHA CT HIAWATHA TR CUL DE SAC 150
HIAWATHA AV ELMHURST RD MAIN BT 1,365
HIAWATHA TR EMERSON ST LONNQUIST BV 1.140
MAIN LONNOUIST BV WELLER CREEK 500
MEIER WHITE OAK ST CONNIE LN 200
HATLEN ESTATES DR MARTNA LN 500
WILLIAM ST GOLF RD BERKSHIRE LN 1.510
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
o8/31/2001 Pavemenf~l 0-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
1999-Actual
CALLERO CT CAT/NO CT CUL-DE-SAC 255
CENTENNIAL DR WESTGATE RD END PAVMENT 1,210
LINBEN LN WESTGA TE RD HEMLOCK LN 900
EASTMAN DR HOLLY A V GARWOOD DR 600
GARWOOD DR EASTMAN DR WILSHIRE DR 450
GARWOOD DR WlLSHIRE DR END PAVMENT 490
WINDSOR DR GARWOOD DR HIGHLAND AV 765
HIGHLAND AV RAND RD/RT 12 EASTMAN DR 965
EASTMAN DR HIGHLANDAV HOLLYAV 320
WILSHIRE DR HIGHLAND AV KENSINGTON RD 1,145
wrrHoRN LN MA C ARTHUR BV CUUDE-SAC 205
ALBERT ST HENRY ST CENTRAL RD 820
MAC ARTHUR DR MEMORY LN GREGORY ST 640
MAC ARTHUR DR GREGORYST FORESTAV 2,100
CAROL LN ESTATES DR CUL DE SAC 370
ROBBIE LN CRESTWOOD LN RUSTY DR 1,075
CRESTWOOD LN LINCOLN ST ESTATES DR 1,345
CRESTWOOD LN ESTATES DR LONNQUIST SV 1,340
LANCASTER ST PROSPECT A V CENTRAL RD 1,190
WE-GO TR LINCOLN ST CENTRAL RD 2,665
NA-WA-TA AY LINCOLN ST COUNCIL TR 1,820
EVA LN LINNEMAN RD CYPRESS DR 685
TAMARACK DR GROVE DR THORNWOOD LN 705
CYPRESS DR COTTONWOOD LN ASH DR 1,560
PALM DR BUSSE RD TAMARACK DR 2200
GREENBRIER GLENCALE LN BUSSE RD 1,000
HOLLY LN EASTMAN DR ENO PAVMENT 190
HOLLY CT EASTMAN DR CUL DE SA C 200
BUS CENTER DR WHEELING RD FEERANVILLE DR 700
MT PROSPECT RD CENTRAL BUSSEAV 400
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resudacing Program (1997 ~ 2006)
08~1~001 Pavemen610E~xb
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
2000-Actual
LOWDEN LN STRA TTON LN WOLF RD 1,785
EASTMAN CT HILL ST CUL-DE-SAC 510
WESTGATE RD CENTRAL RD WILDWOOD LN 2,630
STRATTON LN HENRYST GREGORYST 1,740
MULBERRY LN GREENWOOD DR WESTGA TE RD 1,045
KILL ST RAND RD /RT 12 END PAVMENT 675
BIERMAN CT BUS CENTER DR CUL DE SAC 675
LAKE VIEW CT BUS CENTER DR CUL DE SAC 600
ARDYCE LN WESTGATE RD CUL DE SAC 1,100
ISABELLA ST DALE A V OAK ST 1,055
LEONARD AV LINCOLN ST END PVMT 1,340
BALE AV NWHWY GREGORYST 1,250
MARTIN LN CRESTWOODLN HATLENAV 910
MYRTLE DR CRESTWOOD LN HA TLEN A V 1,040
NOAH TE LAWRENCE LN CML DE SAC 1,180
MARTKA LN HA TLEN A V CRES TWOOD LN 920
CATHY LN PVMT CHANGE CENTRAL RD 1,000
ELM ST CENTRAL RD BUSSEAV 600
MARINA ST COUNCIL TR CUL DE SAC 260
INNER CIRLCE DR ClTY LIMIT CUL DE SAC 300
WA-PELLA AV GOLF RD SUNSET RD 845
GOLFVlEW PL GOLFVIEW A V GOLF RD 180
SUNSET RD EMERSON ST END C/G 475
KELENA AV LINCOLN ST WHITE OAK ST 615
HICKORY AV WHITE OAK ST CUL DE SA C 620
EDGEWOOD LN LONNQUIST BV BLACKHA WI( DR 815
GOLFVIEW DR ALBERT ST EDWARD ST 745
BASSWOOD LN EUCLID A V CREE LN 200
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2~)06)
08/31/20Ol Paveraen~10-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
2001
PINE ST KENSINGTON RD GREGORY ST 2.590
6RE6ORY ST FOREST A V PINE ST 2.020
BOB-O-LINK RD FORESTAV ELMNURSTAVE 1.800
WILLIAM ST THA YER ST GREGORY ST 1.330
RIDGE AY HENRY ST CENTRAL RD 560
MEIER RD LA WERENCE LN LINCOLN ST 1,280
MEIER RD LONNOUIST BV PRENDERGAST LN 640
BUSSE AV WAPELLA AV ELMHURST AV 920
WAVERLY PL CLEVEN A V BU$SE A V 1,270
HI-LUSI AV COUNCIL TR LINCOLN ST 1.410
LINCOLN ST EMERSON ,ST WILLIAM ST 1,925
LINCOLN ST MAIN ST EMERSON ST 335
SHA-BONEE TR ELMHURST RD EMERSON ST 1.410
PRAIRIE AV LINCOLN ST WHITE OAK ST 570
BLACKNAWK DR EDGEWOOD LN GLENDALE LN 600
OJIBWA TR BLACKHAWKDR PVMTEND 190
TAMARACK DR TNORNWOOD LN WILLOW LN 620
Village of Mount Prospect
PropOSed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr.xb
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
2002
ALBERT ST CENTRAL RD NW HWY 3,165
BERKSHIRE LN SCHOOL ST WILLIAM ST 730
BLACKHAWK DR EDGEWOOD LN GLENDALE LN 750
BURNING BUSH LN SEMINOLELN SENECA LN 415
BURNING BUSH LN CAMP MCDONALD R EUCLID A V 2,585
BURR OAK DR BURNING BUSH LN CUL-DE-SAC 1,030
BUSSE AY MAIN ST WILLE ST 355
BUBSE AY ELM ST SCHOOL ST 380
BUSSE AV WE-GO TR WAPELLA A V 1,905
BUSSE AV MAIN ST ELM ST 1,115
BUSSE AV SCHOOL ST MT PROSPECT RD 2,651
CATALPA LN ROBERT DR FERN DR 1,005
CIRCLE DR FROST DR COTTONWOOD LN 710
CREE LN BASSWOOD LN INDIGO DR 760
CYPRESS DR ASH DR GOLF RD 1,000
EASTWOOD AV HENRY ST GREGORY ST 1,970
EASTWOOD AV GREGORYST MEMORYLN 660
FAIRVlEW AV MEMORYLN GREGORY,ST 670
FAIRVIEW AV GREGORYST NWHWY 2,205
FEENANVILLE DR BUS CENTER DR WOLF RD 4,960
FERN DR CATALPA LN WILLOW LN 310
GO-WANDO AV WA-PELLA A V EXT HI-LUSI A V 240
GREGORY ST ELMHURST A V MAIN ST 1,335
HENRY ST ELMHURSTRD FORESTAV 1,310
NI-LUSI AY LINCOLN ST CENTRAL RD 2,470
LINCOLN ST MT PROSPECT RD EDWARD ST 1,155
ISABELLA ST RAND RD /RT 12 OWEN ST 680
ISABELLA ST FORESTAV BASTWOODAV 990
KENILWORTH AV CENTRAL RD PROSPECT A V 1,635
KEN NETH DR BUSSE RD END OF PVMT 990
LINCOLN ST ELMHURST AV CANDOTA AV 1~510
LONNQUIST BV EMERSON ST MAIN ST 440
LONHQUIST BV BYRON CT ELMHURST RD 400
LONNQUIST BV SCHOOL ST EMERSON ST 1,125
MAIN ST UNCOLN ST COUNCIL TR 1,320
MALMO RD ALGONQUIN RD CDS 700
MEADOW LN ELMHURSTRD EUCLIDAV 2,035
NA-WA-TA AV LONNOUIST BV GOLF RD 1,625
OXFORD PL ELMHURST RD WEDGEWOOD LN 485
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
0813112001 PavemenM0-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
PINE ST PROSPECTAV LINCOLN ST 1,745
PINE ST LINCOLN ST COUNCIL TR 1,330
PROSPECT AV ELMHURSTAV MAIN ST 1,295
PROSPECT AV CENTRAL RD ELMHURSTAV 990
PROSPECT MAN AV MEMORYLN GREGORY ST 660
SEE-GWLIN AV MILBURN A V DRESSER DR 465
SEE-GWUN AV GOLF RD LONNQUIST BV 1,640
STRATFORD PL WEDGEWOODLN MEADOWLN 590
THAYER ST FORESTAV ELMHURSTAV 1,315
TNORNWOOD LN TAMARACKDR LAVERGNEDR 1,270
WALL ST ALGONQUIN RD CUL DE SAC 1,770
WATERMAN AV GREGORY ST NW HWY 485
WEDGE'WOOD LN RAND RD/ RT 12 EUCLID AV 1,535
WELLER LN CLEVEN A V CUL-DE-SAC 505
WELLER LN CENTRAL RD CLEVEN AV 1,545
WILLE ST CENTRAL RD HENRY ST 615
Village of Mount ProsPect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997- 2006)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LEN6TH
2003
BARBERRy LN WESTGA TE RD SYCAMORE LN 1,120
BARBERRY LN CRABTREE LN HEMLOCK LN E 755
BERKSHIRE LN EMERSON ST SCHOOL ST 1,215
BIRCH RD MAYA LN SENECA LN 1,190
BOULDERDR BURNING BUSH LN CUL.DE-SAC 1,567
BOXWOOD DR WHEELING RD WHEELING RD 2,535
BREHTWOOD LN GREENWOOD DR CEDAR LN 955
CAN-DOTA AV GOLF RD LONNOUIST BV 1,620
CONNIE LH HA TLEN AY MEIER RD 795
COTTONWOOD LN LINNEMAN RD REDWOOD A V W 1,495
COUNCIL TR ' EMERSON ST ELMHURST RD 1,510
COUNCIL TR WILLIAM ST EMERSON ST 1,790
CRABTREE LN EUCLID A V CEDAR LN S 700
CRABTREE LN CEDAR LN S GREENWOOD DR 850
DENEEN LH THAYER ST SMALL LN 620
DOGWOOD LH BOXWOOD DR WHEELING RD 430
DRESSER DR BUSSE A V CANDO TA A V 1,600
ELAYNE CT BRIARWOOD DR CUL DE SAC 260
ELM ST LONNQUIST BV GOLF RD 1,475
EMERSON ST NW HWY CENTRAL RD 1,115
EMERSON ST LONNQUISTBV COUNTRYLN 1,600
ERIC AV CUL-DE-SAC A UTUNM LN 745
ESTATES DR CRESTWOOD LN CAROL LN 735
EVERGREEN AY ELM ST SCHOOL ST 380
EVERGREEN AV PROSPECTAV ELMHURSTAV 1,110
FOREST AV BOB-O-LINK RD END PA VMENT 300
FOREST AV KENSINGTON RD BOB-O-LINK RD 1,825
60-WANDO AV HI-LUSI AV SHA-BONEE TR 150
GREGORY ST WA TERMAN AV DALE AV 1,330
HELENA AY WHITE OAK ST LINCOLN ST 670
HICKORY AV WHITE OAK ST CUL DE SAC 670
HICKORY DR EVA LN COTTONWOOD LN 885
HI-LUSl AV LONNQUIST BV GOLF RD 1,600
HI-LUSI EXT MAN-A-WA TR HI-LUSI AV 240
I-OKA AV LONNQUIST BV HIAWATHA TR 690
IRONWOOD DR BRENTWOOD LN WHEELING RD 1,115
KENILWORTH ST LINCOLN ST BUSSE A V 2,435
LINCOLN ST BUSSE RD MEIER RD 21645
LOCUST LB LA VERGNE DR TAMARACK DR 1,260
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 1 O-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
08/31/'2001 Pavement~10-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
LONNQUIST BV CRESTWOOD A V MEIER RD 1,325
MEMORY LN DALEAV FORESTAV 1,325
MILBURN AV MAINBT ELMNURSTAV 1,115
MURA LN PARK DR SEMINOLE LN 2,210
OWEN ST CENTRAL RD NW HWY 2,100
PAWNEE LN BURNING BUSH LN MURA LN 920
PINE ST RUSBEL ST CENTRAL RD 525
PRAIRIE AV LINCOLN ST WHITE OAK ST 670
ROBIN LN ROBERTDR WAVERLYAV 1,090
SPRUCEWOOD DR PALMDR WlLLOWLN 800
STEVENSON LN CENTRAL RD LOWDEN LN 2,460
SUNSET RD END CIG SCHOOL ST 645
VERDE DR BONITA AV BONITA AV 1,545
WA-PELLA AV LINCOLN ST COUNCIL TR 1,770
WHITE OAK ST PRAIRIE A V HELENA A V 660
WILLE ST COUNCIL TR LINCOLN ST 1,325
WlLLE ST LINCOLN ST PROSPECT A V 1,600
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resufiacing Program (1997 - 2006)
08/31~001 Pavemen610~x~
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
2004
AUTUMN LN ERIC A V HARVEST LN 1,055
BARBERRY LN HEMLOCK LN E WESTGATE RD 1,090
BEECHWOOD DR PALM DR WlLLOW LN 1,260
BISHOP CT BUS CENTER DR CUL-DE-SAC 930
BORO LN WOOD LN TANO LN 775
BREN~I/OOD LN KENSINGTON RD GREENWOOD DR 980
CAN-DOTA AY LINCOLN ST BUSSE A V 1,915
CHESTNUT DR COTTONWOOD LN CATALPA LN 1,175
COTTONWOOD LN REDWOOD A V W BUSSE RD 1,300
COUNTRY LN SUNSET RD GOLF RD 850
ESTATES DR BUSSE RD CRESTWOOD LN 1,520
EVERGREEN AV SCHOOL ST MT PROSPECT RD 2,675
FERN DR WlLLOW LN PALM DR 990
FRONTAGE RD GOLFRD ROBERTDR 830
GEORGE ST PROSPECTAV GOLFHURSTAV 2,325
GOLFHURST AV EDWARD ST ALBERT ST 735
GREEN LN HORNER LN STEVENSON LN 650
GREENFIELD LN IRONWOOD DR BARBERRY LN 1,930
GREENWOOD DR SYCAMORE LN WOLF RD 1,330
GRINDEL DR END PVMT END PVMT 610
GROVE DR GOLF RD END PVMT 1,245
HATLEN CT HATLEN DR CUL DE SAC 150
HIAWATHA AV MA NA WA TR ELMHURST RD 650
HI-LUSI AV MAN-A-WA TR LONNQUIST BV 660
HNTNGTN CMNS RD ELMHURST RD LINNEMAN RD 2,875
I-OKA AY LINCOLN ST COUNCIL TR 1,360
ISABELLA ST MAIN ST OWEN ST 1 ;835
LASALLE ST WALL ST ELMHURST RD 880
LOUIS ST CENTRAL RD NW HWY 2,545
MAGNOLIA LN BUSSE RD TAMARACK DR 2,055
MAIN ST SUNSET RD LONNQUIST BV 680
MAN-A-WA TR ELMHURST RD NAWATA AV 2,145
MAPLE ST GOLF RD LONNQUIST BV 1,485
MEIER RD LINCOLN ST CONNIE LN 860
MILBURN AV EMERSON ST MAIN ST 355
OWEN ST LONNQUISTBV GOLFRD 1,390
PHEASANT TR CITY LIMIT BUSSE RD 2,205
ROBERT DR WILLOW LN GOLF RD 1,460
RUSSELLST KENSINGTON RD HIGHLAND ST 1,305
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr.x!s
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
SEE-GWUN AY COUNCIL TR LINCOLN ST 1,745
SENECA LN BURNING BUSH LN PARK DR 1,730
SHA-BONEE TR SCHOOL ST EDWARD ST 1,320
SUNSET RD SCHOOL ST WILLIAM ST 670
THAYER ST ELMHURST AV MAIN ST 1,310
WA-PELLA AY EVERGREEN AV LINCOLN ST 1,245
WA-PELLA AV LONNQUIST BV MAN-A-WA TR 440
WAVERLY PL CENTRAL RD PROSPECTA V 1,415
WE-GO TR LONNQUISTBV GOLFRD 1,615
WHITE OAK ST HELENA AV DOUGLAS AV 325
WHITEGATE DR WE-GO TR CUL-DE-SAC 1,245
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed lO-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
2005
APACHE LN BOULDER DR BURNING BUSH LN 960
ARDYCE LN CUL-DE-SAC WESTGA TE RD 1,130
ASH DR BEECHWOOD DR CYPRESS DR 660
BERKSHIRE LN PINE ST EMERSON S T 1,205
BIRCN DR PALM DR WlLLOW LN 1,080
CAROL LN LINCOLN ST ESTATES DR 1,505
CEDAR LN BRENTWOOD LN CRABTREE LN 385
CEDAR LN WHEELING RD BRENTWOOD LN 765
CHERRYWOOD DR WILLOW LN PALM DR 860
CRAIG CT LINCOLN ST CUL DE SAC 325
DEBORAH LN LINCOLN ST ESTATES DR 1,475
DOGWOOD LN WHEELING RD BRENTWOOD LN 850
EDWARD ST GOLFVIEWDR GOLFHURSTAV 990
ELM ST HIGHLAND ST GREGORY ST 1,320
ELM ST BERKSHIRE LN COUNCIL TR 645
ELMHURST AV BOB-O-LINK RD KENSINGTON RD 995
EMERSON ST LINCOLN ST COUNCIL TR 1,325
GOLFVIEW PL CUL DE SAC GOLFVIEW A V 675
HACKBERRy LN WHEELING RD BRENT~4/OOD LN 1,005
HATLEN AY ESTATES DR LONNQUISTBV 1,220
HATLEN AV CENTRAL RD LINCOLN ST 3,980
HUNT CLUB DR HNTNGTN CMNS RD GOLF RD 2,235
I-OKA AV GOLF RD LONNQUIST BV 1,655
LAVERGNE DR WILLOW LN PALM DR 905
LINCOLN ST MEIER RD PRAIRIE A V 330
LONNQUIST BV ROBERT DR . BUSSE RD 935
LONNQUlST BY OWEN ST SCHOOL ST 610
MAIN ST COUNCIL TR BERKSHIRE LN 505
MAIN ST LONNQUIST BV END PVMT 550
MAYA LN BURNING BUSH LN VILLAGELIMITS 2,195
MEMORY LN ELMHURSTAV MAIN ST 1,310
MILBURN AV CANDOTA AV WE-GO TR 1,140
NElL AV HARVEST LN AUTUNM LN 560
OAK ST GREGORYST MEMORYLN 645
OAKWOOD DR GOLF RD PALM DR 640
OAKWOOD DR PALM DR WILLOW LN 910
ORIOLE LN FORESTAV ELMHURSTAV 1,285
PALM DR ROBERTDR BUSSERD 1,120
PARK DR SEMINOLE LN SENECA LN 620
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr, x~s
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
PARK DR SENECA LN CAMP MCDONALD Ri 2.220
PARK LN TANO LN WOOD LN 1.130
PINE ST COUNCIL TR BERKSHIRE LN 290
PROSPECT MAN AV RAND RD / RT 12 BOB-O-LINK RD 350
REDWOOD DR COTTONWOOD LN DEMPSTER ST 900
ROBERT BR COTTONWOODLN WILLOWLN 1.430
SCHOOL ST LINCOLN ST PROSPECT AV 490
SMALL LN STEVENSON LN STRA TON LN 970
SUNSET RB ROBERT DR CAN-DOTA AV 2,715
SUNSET RD ELMHURST RD EMERSON ST 1,550
THAYER ST YATES LN STRATTON LN 1,320
TBAYER ST MAIN ST LOUIS ST 2,625
VERDE CT VERDE DR CUL DE SAC 135
WHITE OAK ST MEIER RD PRAIRIE A V 330
WlLLE ST GREGORY ST KENSINGTON RD 2,630
WILLIAM ST PROSPECT A V COUNCIL TR 1,400
WOOD LN BURNING BUSH LN CAMP MCDONALD Ri 1,365
YUMA LN BURNING BUSH LN PARK DR 1.170
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resurfacing Program (1997 - 2006)
08/3112001 PavemenM 0-yr.xls
STREET FROM TO LENGTH
2006
ADDISON CT BUSSE RD CUL DE SAC 1,125
ALBERT ST GOLFHURST A V GOLFVIEW DR 885
ALBERT ST COUNCIL TR END PVMT 1.270
ALBERT ST PROSPECT A V COUNCIL TR 625
AUDREY LN CONNIE LN 80NITA A V 755
BITTERSWEET LN BURNING BUSH LN QUINCE LN 1,285
BONITA AV BUSSE RD CUL DE SAC 580
CAN-BOTA AV COUNCIL TR LINCOLN ST 1.805
CHRIS LN MEIER LN CUL DE SAC 420
EASTWOOD AY MEMORY LN HIGHLAND ST 660
EDWARD ST PROSPECTAV COUNCIL TR 1.010
ELDERBERRY LN BRENTWOOD LN WHEELING RD 890
ELM ST GREGORY ST CENTRAL RD 2,600
EMERSON ST CENTRAL RD GREGORY ST 2.625
EMERSON ST GREGORY ST HIGHLAND ST 1.320
FOREST AV GREGORY ST KENSINGTON RD 2.660
FOREST AV NWHWY ISABELLA ST 1.385
FREEDOM CT HARITAGEDR CUL-DE~AC 530
GRACE DR ASH DR PALM DR 845
FIARITAGE DR WOLF RD KENSINGTON RD 2.785
HAVEN ST MEIERRD DOUGLASAV 1.315
HENRY ST OWEN ST WAIN ST 1,865
HIGHLAND ST ELMHURSTAV FORESTAV 1.315
KENNICOTT PL LONNQUIST BV CUL DE SA C 800
KINGSTON CT FEEHANVlLLE DR CUL-DE-SAC 700
LARKDALE LN ELMHURSTAV FORESTAV 1.285
LIBERTY CT HARITAGE DR CUL-DE-SAC 435
LINCOLN ST CANDOTA A V BUSSE RD 3.790
LOIS LN LA WRENCE LN CULDE SAC 525
MAPLE ST LINCOLN ST SHA-BONEE TR 650
MAPLE ST PROSPECT A V LINCOLN ST 915
MARK TE CAROL LN MEIER RD 500
ONEIDA LN AZTEC LN END PAVEMENT 300
ORCHARD PL ELMHURST RD MAIN ST 1.105
OWEN ST GREGORY ST ISABELLA ST 650
PALM DR GRACE ST BEACHWOOD DR 365
PALI~ DR BEACHWOOD DR ROBERT DR 340
PINE ST GREGORY ST RUSSEL ST 2,055
PINE ST CENTRAL RD NW HWY 505
Village of Mount Prospect
Proposed 10-Year Resun'acing Program (1997 - 2006)
08/31/2001 Pavement~10-yr.x~s
STREET FROM TO .ENGTH
PROSPECT AV MAPLEST MTPROBPECTRD 3,900
PROSPECT MAN AV HIGHLAND ST MEMORYLN 660
SCHOOL ST CENTRAL RD GREGORYST 2,610
SCHOOL ST NW HWY CENTRAL RD 1.895
SCHOOL ST COUNCIL TR SHA-BONEE TR 660
SCHOOL ST BERKSHIRE LN COUNCIL TR 935
SCOTT TE MEIER RD CAROL LN 490
SUNSET RD HI LUSl A V ELMHURST RD 765
TOWER DR COUNTRYLN SUNSETRD 1.245
WA-PELLA AY CENTRAL RD EVERGREEN AV 1,305
WA-PELLA AV EXT WA-PELLA A V GO-WANDO A V 350
WILDWOOD LN WESTGATE RD CUL-DE-SAC 770
WlLLE ST BERKSHIRE LN COUNCIL TR 565
WILLIAM ST COUNCIL TR BERKSHIRE LN 1.225
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS ~-,~
FROM: DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2001
SUBJECT: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
Background
In November of 1990, the Village Board adopted a Stormwater Management Program designed to reduce
the magnitude and frequency of flooding in selected areas of the Village. The initial program included 14
different flood control projects Village-wide at an estimated cost of $18,300,000. Also included was an
erosion control project that dealt'with the stabilization of the banks along Weller Creek between Central
Road and School Street was added at an estimated cost of $6,000,000.
With the aid of special, Iow-interest loans from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) and
sales tax revenue earmarked for flood control projects, the Village started Phase One projects in August
of 1991. Since that time, 13 of the 14 projects have been started and/or completed at a total cost of
$15,991,573 with $10,288,014 of it funded with IEPA loans. The sole remaining project from the initial
program is the Hatlen Heights Storm Sewer Improvements at an estimated cost of $1,900,000.
Work on Weller Creek began in 1996 with the award of a contract to perform a study of various bank
stabilization methods. Along with that, an annual creek maintenance program was started in 1997 to
clean up Village creeks and, in 1998, a section of Weller Creek between Emerson and Main Streets was
repaired. To dat~, a' total of $1,504,683 has been spent on Weller Creek. Most of this expenditure
($1,243,833) was spent stabilizing banks and replacing bridges between Emerson Street and Main
Street. An additional $150,000 has been spent pruning dead limbs from trees and clearing debris from
the creek channel. The balance ($110,800) was spent on a pre-design bank stabilization study and the
Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) study.
We have also completed design work for the rehabilitation of the reach between School Street and
Emerson Street and the reach between Main Street and Route 83. The estimated cost of this project is
$2,591,000. $1,000,000 of the funding for this project will come from an Illinois First grant. The balance
will come from available Flood Control Construction funds.
Work remaining on Weller Creek includes approximately $2,200,000 worth of bank stabilization between
Central Road and Route 83 (Reaches B, C, and D).
In addition, staff has also identified the need to perform approximately $1,000,000 worth of bank
stabilization work on McDonald Creek between the Wisconsin Central right-of-way and Kensington Road.
Similar projects, each estimated to cost approximately $1,000,000, have also been identified for
Feehanvirle Creek and Higgins Creek. None of these projects have been sanctioned by the Village Board
and are presented here for informational purposes only.
Page 2 of 4
Stormwater Management Program Status Report
September 20, 2001
Attached is a table detailing all the Stormwater Management projects, their costs, and either actual or
projected completion dates. Also attached is a brief description of the completed projects. Following is
discussion of in-progress and pending projects.
IN PROGRESS PROJECTS
· Melas ParldCrumle¥ Erosion Control Install erosion control materials around the spillways in the
Crumley and Melas Park Detention Basins. This project was originally slated for 2000. However,
inspection and evaluation of the underdrain systems in these facilities proved problematic and slowed
the design process. Designs are now complete and the project has been scheduled for construction
during 2002. Final completion is expected by year-end 2002. The estimated cost is $110,000.
· Wed,qewood Floodinq Area This project was slated for construction during 2000 at an estimated
cost of $210,000. The Village has received a $200,000 Illinois First grant to partially fund these
improvements.
The original concept for this project, which was framed shortly after the Stormwater Management
Program was adopted by the Village Board in 1990, entailed replacement of some failed storm sewer
segments and a nominal ameut3t of ditch grading.
However, preparation of actual construction plans prompted a closer examination of the problem.
This examination revealed that extensive ditch regrading, replacement of almost every culvert,
placement of some new storm sewers, and removal of almost every tree in the street rights-of-way,
would be necessary to effect appreciable relief to the surface flooding problems in the neighborhood.
In fact, the Village's design engineer, Peter F. Olesen and Associates, Inc. (Olesen), of Mount
Prospect, has determined that almost $615,000 worth of improvements are necessary to ease
surface flooding in the Wedgewood subdivision.
Specifically, Olesen has determined that re-establishing the "open ditch" or "rural" drainage system
will require the following work tasks:
Regrade all existing ditches to a 4:1 slope.
Establish uniform ditch depth of 1.5-2.5 feet.
Replace most driveway culverts.
Replace storm sewer on the west side of Meadow Lane near Wedgewood Lane.
Install new storm sewers along the south end of Meadow Lane to Route 83.
Install new storm sewers to alleviate rear yard flooding problems along Stratford Lane
and Meadow Lane.
In addition, it should be noted that all of the streets in the Wedgewood subdivision are slated for
resurfacing. Staff recommends resurfacing all streets in the subdivision after drainage improvements
are completed. The cost of resurfacing these streets is included in the Village Accelerated Road
Program. It is not included in Olesen's estimated project cost ($615,000).
It should also be noted that there are currently no sidewalks or curbs installed along the interior
streets of the Wedgewood Subdivision (Wedgewood, Meadow, Stratford, and Oxford).
Obviously, the scope and cost'of this project are significantly greater than planned. In addition, the
extent of the ditch grading and tree removals will dramatically affect the aesthetics of the
neighborhood and may prove unpalatable for area residents.
With these thoughts in mind, staff and Olesen re-examined the problem and devised a much more
limited solution. This limited solution is intended to address the worst problem areas and is
Page 3 of 4
Stormwater Management Program Status Report
September 20, 2001
predicated on the notions that flat ditch lines (water standing in ditches), steep ditch slopes, and
damaged but functional culverts ara acceptable in unimproved areas of the subdivision. The
estimated cost of this solution is $198,000.
The specific work tasks included in this solution are:
[3 Regrade some ditches to a 4:1 slope and 1.5 to 2.5 foot depth.
Replace approximately 16 (of 56) culverts.
[3 Install new sewer on west side of Wedgewood Lane near Meadow Lane.
Install new storm sewers to alleviate rear yard flooding problems along Stratford Lane
and Meadow Lane.
[3 Install new inlets at the south end of Meadow Lane near Route 83.
[3 Remove approximately 10-12 trees.
As with the previous option, the streets will be resurfaced after these improvements ara completed.
The cost of street improvements is not included in the project estimate. Similarly, there are no plans
to install sidewalks.
To cover all the options, staff .also determined that it would cost approximately $1,400,000 to install
curb/gutter and a closed storm sewer system throughout the Wedgewood subdivision. This estimate
only includes the cost to widen the pavement to a standard width and install curb, gutter, and storm
sewers. It does not include the cost of improving the existing pavement. This cost to improve the
existing pavement has been programmed into the Accelerated Road Improvement Program.
This solution would also involve the removal of the majority of the parkway trees.
in the past, the cost to install curb and gutter has been split with affected property owners. In this
case, the Village's liability would be $700,000. Residents in the Wedgewood subdivision would be
asked to contribute another $700,000. Approximately 56 homes would benefit from these proposed
improvements. The average cost per homeowner would be $12,500. The likely instrument to raise
these funds would be a special service area.
These options will be presented to Wedgewood residents at a public meeting to be held in the Senior
Center at 7:00 PM on Monday, September 24, 2001. Staff intends to poll residents in attendance for
a preferred solution. The results of this poll will be available for the Village Board's consideration at
the September 25 Committee of the Whole meeting. A copy of the flyer inviting residents to attend
this meeting is attached. This flyer was hand-delivered to Wedgewood subdivision residents on
September 15.
A map depicting the Wedgewood project area is attached.
· Creek Tree Maintenance Remove all deadwood and trees hanging in flow lines of Village-
maintained creeks. Work began on Weller Creek in 1997, with $50,000 budgeted annually. To date,
we have completed the following segments: Weller Creek between School Street and Route 88,
Weller Creek between Central Road and Lincoln Street, all of McDonald Creek, and Feehanville
Creek from Feehanville Drive to 1221 Business Center Drive. The total cost.for work to date is
$250,000. The remainder of Weller Creek (between Lincoln Street and Route 83), the remainder of
Feehanville Creek, and Higgins Creek remain pending.
· Weller Creek Bank Stabilization Reach A2 (Route 83 to Main Street and Emerson Street to
School Street In the area between Main Street and Route 83 (excluding Reach A1 area), construct
a sheet piling wall along the south bank; install a partial monoslab channel bottom; remove trees; and
stabilize the north bank utilizing bioengineering solutions. In the area between School Street and
age 4 of 4
Stormwater Management Program Status Report
September 20, 2001
Emerson Street, remove trees and stabilize both banks utilizing bioengineering solutions. The project
was slated to start during summer 2000 and be completed by November 2001. However, delays in
obtaining necessary state and federal permits stalled the bid letting. Currently, the Village possesses
all required permits and a contract has been awarded to the Thomas M. Madden Company of Carol
Stream, Illinois. The construction contract is valued at $1,841,900. Construction is scheduled to start
in October 2001. The project should be substantially completed by the end of 2002. This project was
originally slated for the out years beyond 2006 but was accelerated due to the receipt of a $1,000,000
Illinois First grant.
PENDING PROJECTS
· Hatlen Heiqhts Floodinq Area Construct a relief storm sewer from Hatlen Avenue and Hatlen Court
to the Crumley Detention Basin on Busse Road. This project was originally scheduled for 2001 but
was deferred in order to fund Phase II of the Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project. This
project is now slated for 2006. The estimated cost is $1,900,000.
· Weller Creek Bank Stabilization Reaches B~ C, and D install bank stabilization material along
Weller Creek between Central Road and Lincoln Street and Lincoln Street and Route 83. Estimated
cost: $2,200,000. This project.does not have a projected construction date. Funding is not available
until at least 2006.
· McDonald Creek Bank Stabilization Install retaining wall and bioengineering streambank
stabilization solutions along both banks of McDonald Creek between the Wisconsin Central Railroad
right-of-way and Burning Bush Lane. Reestablish bank toe and regrade banks between Burning
Bush Lane and Kensington Road. Estimated cost: $1,000,000. This project does not have a
projected construction date. Funding is not available until at least 2006.
· Feehanville Creek Bank Stabilization Stabilize banks with sheet pile retaining walls and/or
vegetated geogrids at various locations. Reestablish bank toe and regrade banks. Estimated cost:
$1,000,000. This project does not have a projected construction date. Funding is not available until
at least 2006.
· HiRqins Creek Bank Stabilization Regrade banks and reestablish bank toe at vadous locations.
Estimated cost: $1,000,000. This project does not have a projected construction date. Funding is
not available until at least 2006.
SEAN P. DORSEY
GRA/SPD~s~d
attach.
X:\FILES\FRONTOFF~EWERS\FLOOD_RE\STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT 2001 .DOC
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Proposed Implementation Schedule for Stormwatar Management
September 2001
.... Pa~t~ funding fc~ ~his project came frern a $200,000 tllirx~is F~rst grant,
COMPLETED PROJECTS
· Clearwater Floodinq Area Constructed a new relief storm sewer extending along Busse
Road from the Clearwater retention basin to the Mount Prospect Golf Course drainage ditch.
Completed July 1992 at a cost of $755,112.
· Des Plaines River Backwater Control Valves Installed large backwater control valves on
the Village's existing storm sewer that discharges into the Des Plaines River. These valves
keep the river from backing up into the Village's system during flood stage. Completed.
August 1993 at a cost of $318,803.
· Central/Wa-Pella, See-Gwun/Milburn Floodin,q Areas Constructed a new relief storm
sewer extending along Wa-Pella and Can-Dota Streets from Central Road to Weller Creek.
Completed January 1993 at a cost of $3,071,156.
· Fairview Gardens Sanitary Area Constructed a parallel sanitary relief sewer, a new
sanitary lift station, and a wet well from Hornet and Central to Thayer and Stevenson.
Completed July 1993 at a cost of $656,966.
· Prospect Manor/North Main FIoodinq Area Constructed a combined relief sewer from
Forest and Highland to the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District's (MWRD) deep tunnel
sewer at business Center Drive and Rand Road. Completed May 1994 at a cost of
$4,055,260.
· Hatlen Hei.qhts Sanitary Area Constructed a parallel sanitary relief sewer from Hatlen and
Beverly to the MWRD intemeptor sewer at Weller Creek and Lincoln Street. Completed
December 1994 at a cost of $1,947,357.
· Stevenson/Thayer Floodin.q Area Constructed a relief storm sewer from Thayer and
Stevenson to the Feehanville Drainage Ditch near Wolf Road. Completed October 1994 at a
cost of $1,029,927.
· See-Gwun/Golf Floodin.q Area Constructed a relief storm sewer from We-Go and Sunset to
Na-Wa-Ta and Lonnquist. Completed September 1996 at a cost of $615,598.
· Catalpa/Birch Floodinq Area Constructed a relief storm sewer from Catalpa and Birch to
Fem and Willow. Completed October 1995 at a cost of $252,561.
· See-Gwun/Milburn Sanitary Area Constructed a parallel sanitary relief sewer end new
sanitary relief station at Lincoln just east of We-Go to See-Gwun and Milburn; completed April
1998 at a cost of $1,209,330.
· Maple/Berkshire Sanitary Area Constructed a parallel sanitary relief sewer and new
sanitary relief station on Berkshire between Maple and Elm. Project started March 1999 and
reached final completion in January 2000. The total cost of the project was $1,802,503
· Weller Creek CSO Study Analyzed the operational parameters of the combined sewer
overflows (CSO) along Weller Creek using a computer model of the primary interceptors in
the watershed. Project completed in June 1999 at a cost of $55,150.
· Weller Creek Bank Stabilization Study Determined methods and estimated costs to
stabilize the banks and replace two bridges along Weller Creek between School Street and
Central Road. Completed January 1996 at a cost of $55,650.
· Weller Creek Bank Stabilization and Bridqe Replacements, Reach A1 in the area
between Emerson and Main Street, constructed a sheet piling wall along the south bank;
installed a monoslab channel bottom; stabilized the north bank utilizing bioengineering
solutions; raised the Emerson Street Bridge; and removed and replaced the Main Street
pedestrian bridge. Completed October 1998 at a cost of $1,243,833. This project was
partially funded with a $500,000 grant from the Illinois Department of Natural Resoumes.
Wedgewood Terrace Homeowners!
You're invited to a...
What: Neighborhood Meeting to discuss the
Wedgewood Stormwater Improvements Project
Where: Mount Prospect Senior Center
50 S. Emerson Street
When: Monday, September 24, 2001
7:00 PM
Why: Plans to imprOVe stormwater drainage in the
Wedgewood subdivision will be presented.
Three (3) different approaches will be discussed
and residents will be asked to identify the
preferred solution. Your attendance js strongl~
.. encouraged. Work will start later this fall.
If you have any questions, or are unable to attend, please call or
write Sean Dorsey at Mount Prospect Public Works. Phone: 870.5640.
E-mail: sdorsey@mountprospect.orq.
Wedgewood Terrace Subdivision
N
Euclid Av
Village of Mount Prospect
Public Works Department
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois 600_56~2229
'Phone: 847.870.5640 Fax: 847.253.9377
E-mail: publicworks@mountprospect.org
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I iot
DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2001
SUBJECT: VEHICLE LICENSES-ANTIQUE VEHICLES
For as far back as anyone in the Finance Department can remember the Village has exempted vehicles
with antique license plates from 'the vehicle licensing fee provided for in Chapter 17 of the Mount
Prospect Village Code. Last year there were approximately twenty vehicles that were exempted from
the fee.
Chapter 17 of the Village Code, as currentlyworded, does not reference or authorize the exemption of
antique vehicles. Section 17.2 states that"No motor vehicle, motor driven cycle, motor bicycle, and/or
trailer, semi-trailer, or other vehicle deft ned herein, which is owned or operated by a person who resides
within the Village or which is owned by a company, firm or corporation which has a place of business
located within the Village or which vehicle is registered with the State to an address located within the
Village shall be kept, maintained, stored, or used by such person, company, firm corporation or any
representative, agent or employee thereof within the corporate limits of this Village unless the owner of
such vehicle secures a license therefore each year and pays into the Village Treasury the license fee
as hereinafter provided in this Article.
I recommend the Village either amend the Village Code to provide for the exemption of vehicles with
valid antique license plates as issued by the State of Illinois or begin collecting the fee as currently
provided for by the Village Code. Since we are not sure at this point what the original intent of the
Village Board was at the time the vehicle license fee was established perhaps it would be beneficial to
place this item on a Committee ofthe Whole agenda in the very near future.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
C: Carol Widmer, Deputy Finance Director
I:\Revenue\Vehicle Sticket~Correspondence~2001 ~Antique cars 9~12.doc
17.103
.~hicle and so constructed that and/or trailer, semitrailer or other vehicle
some of its weight and that of its defined herein, which is owned or operated
Icad or is carried by anoth- by a person who resides within the Village
er vehicle, or which is owned by a company, firm or
corporation which has a place of business
3. Sting Every located within the Village or which vehicle
semitrailer which kingpin on a is registered with the State to an address
projection to the the structure located within the Village shall be kept,
of such semitrailer and combined maintained, stored or used by such person,
with the fifth wheel of the tractor company, firm, corporation or any represen-
at a point not less than two '~2') to tative, agent or employee thereof within the :.'"
the rear of the center of the corporate limits of this Village unless the ~
axle of such tractor. (Ord. owner of such vehicle secures a license
7-2-1974) therefor each year and pays into the Village
Treasury the license fee as hereinafter
provided in this Article. For the purposes of
17.102: LICENSES P, EQUI'PJ~D: Pursu- this Section, a vehicle of any such owner
ant to the home rule provisions herein which shall have attached thereto
contained in article VII of the Cohstitution of current motor vehicle license registration
the State of Illinois of 1970, it is declared plates or stickers issued by the Secretary of
legislative intention that the provisions of State shall be considered to be "in use"
this Article I herein control and govern the within the corporate boundaries of the Vii-
subject matter of vehicle licenses. No motor lage. (Ord. 3269, 10-5-1982; Ord. 3986,
vehicle, motor driven cycle, motor bicycle 9-20-1988) ['
17.103: F~.E$: Annual license fees for motor vehicles and trailers of various
shall be as follows:
A. Effective February 1,
1. First division vehicles, motorcycles, motor driven cycles and motor bicycles:
Annual
Class Type Of Vehicle License Fee ~.
W Passenger Automobiles $36.00
The annual fee for a noncommercial vehicle licle owned and operated by
a resident of age sixty five (65) or older shall be twelve ($12.00). Only one age
sixty five (65) or older rate per family shall be allowed. .vehicles shall be
licensed at the rate set out above.
Village of Mount Prospect
RESOLUTION NO. 20-00
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 16-95
DESIGNATING PERSONS WHO SHALL BE EXEMPT
FROM FEES FOR MOUNT PROSPECT MOTOR VEH!CLE LICENSES
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have for many years issued
motor vehicle license stickers or plates to certain persons in recognition of the public service
rendered by them; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect desire to continue
this practice, but to limit it primarily to individuals associated with the government of Mount Prospect
and as specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE.CT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Resolution No. '16-95 is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION TWO: That the following persons shall receive a Mount Prospect motor vehicle sticker
or plate without payment of the fee therefor, as established in Chapter 17 of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect, as amended, subject to the conditions set forth in SECTION FiVE of this
Resolution:
Disabled Veterans of the Armed Services of the United States of America, whose motor vehicle
bears registration plates issued pursuant to Section 625 ILCS 5/3-623 of 'q'he Illinois Vehicle Code";
Economic Development Commission;
Emergency Services Disaster Agency, being a Bureau of the Fire Department;
Ex-Prfsoner of War, whose mOtOr vehicle bears registration plates issued pursuant to Section 625
ILCS 5/3-620 of "The Illinois Vehicte Code";
Finance Commission;
Board of Fire and Police Commissioners;
Firemen's Pension Fund Board;
Board of Library Trustees;
Page 2/3
Vehicle Stick',er Exemptions
Physically Handicapped Person, Whose motor vehicle bears registration plates issued pursuant to
Section 625 ILCS 513-616 of "The Illinois Vehicle Code,~ or who has an identification card duly
authorized by a governmental agency indicating the person to whom the card is issued is
permanently disabled;
Plan Commission;
Police Pension Fund Board;
Safety Commission;
Sister Cities Commission;
Solid Waste Commission;
Special Events Commission;
Volunteer Fire Department;
Youth Commission;
Zoning Board of Appeals; and
as may be set forth in the Illinois ~ompiled Statutes.
SECTION THREE: That the Village of Mount Prospect, the Mount prospect Park District, the River
Trails Park District, and School Districts 21, 26, 57, 59 and 214, as well as all other vehicles having
Illinois State license plates with the ~Schoct Bus" designation thereon shall be issued a Mount
Prospect motor vehicle license sti~ker or plate for each vehicle owned and operated by such body,
provided such vehicle is registered:within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect. Upon
the receipt of such license for such vehicle by such governmental agency, no fee, as established
under the aforementioned Chaptelr 17 shall be paid therefor.
SECTION FOUR: That any not-fo!r-profit organization shall receive a Mount Prospect rector vehicle
sticker or plate without payment of~the fee therefor established under Chapter '17 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect for all vehicles bearing illinois State license plates with the "School Bus"
designation, provided that such vehicle is registered within the corporate limits of the Village of
Mount Prospect. It is further provided that any not-for-profit organization shall receive no more than
one (1) Mount Prospect motor vehicle sticker or plate without payment of the fee therefor, as
established under the aforementioned Chapter 17 for a vehicle bearing Illinois State license plates
with the "CV" designation, provided that such vehicle is registered within the corporate limits of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
Page 3/3
Vehicle Sticker Exemptions
SECTION FIVE: That no person shall receive a motor vehicle license plate without charge as
provided in this Resolution, unless such person resides within the corporate IEnits of the Village of
Mount Prospect and the motor vehicle for which the license sticker or plate is issued is registered
within the corporate limits of said Village. No person shall by virtue of this ResOlution receive more
than one (1) such vehicle license Sticker or plate.
SECTION SIX: That the households of members of the Youth Commiss on shall be entitled to one
(1) vehicle sticker subject to the conditions outlined above.
SECTION SEVEN: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from anti after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES: C0rcoran, Hoefert,: Prikkel, Skowron
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Lohrstorfer
ABSENT: Wilks
PASSED and APPROVED this :18th day of Apdl ,2000,
A'! I EST: : Mayor
Velma~W. Lowe
Village Clerk
MAYOR ~
Gerald L. Farley VILLAGE MANAGER
Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES
T,.o y,.co=.n Village of Mount Prospect .LLAGE E
Paul Wm. Hoefert i Velma W. Lowo
Richard M. Lohrstorf~r
Michae cw. Sko on Community Development Department Phone: 847/818-5328
Irvana IC Wilks Fax: 847/818-5329
Michael A. Zadel 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 'mD: S47/392-6064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
Senior Center Thursday
50 South Emerson Street September 27, 2001
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 7:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDEK
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of August 23, 2001
1. Z~A-21-01 / 1001 S. Busse Koad / Dunkin Donuts
2. ZBA-24-01 / 1778 Cree Lane / Mazur Residence
3. ZBA-25-01 / 212 Audrey Court / Raucci Residence
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA-26-01 / 20 S. Main Street / Norwood Builders / Amend Conditional Use for a Planned Unit
Development. NOTE: This case is Village Board final. (Continued to October Meeting)
V. NEW .BUSINESS
B. ZBA-27SK-01 / SEARS - Mount Prospect Plaza / Variation for a wall sign larger than 150 sq. ft.
NOTE: This case is Zoning Board final.
C. ZBA-28-01 / 1002 S. NaWaTa Avenue / Schlachter Residence / Variation (Lot Coverage).
NOTE: This case is Village Board final.
D. ZBA-29-0i / 303 Douglas / Craig Residence / Conditional Use (Circular/dual frontage driveway).
NOTE: This case is Village Board final.
E. ZBA-30SR-01 / 10 S. Emerson / Mount Prospect Public Library / Special Use (electronic message
board sign). NOTE: This case is Zoning Board final.
F. ZBA-31-01 / Village of Mount Prospect / Text Amendments:
1) Minimum height for fences that secure swimming pools
2) Create lighting standards for canopy lighting at gas stations NOTE: This case is Village Board
final. (Both amendments are continued to the October Meeting)
VI. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would lil~ to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation to
participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056,
847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-21-2001 Hearing Date: August 23, 2001
PETITIONER: W. Thomas Niemira, Agent
285 W. Dundee Road
Palatine, IL 60074
PUBLICATION DATE: July 1 I, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Conditional Use for a drive-thru & Variations
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Jason Doland, Doland Engineering'
Thomas & Lily Hung
D. Scott Mackay
W. Thomas Niemira
Pat O'Brien
Nitin Patel
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes of the July 26, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0. At 7:35, under Old Business, Chairperson Arlene Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-21-01, a request
for a Conditional Use for a drive-thru & Variations for landscape requirements and setbacks for a proposed Dunkin
Donuts/Baskin-Robbins at 1001 S. Busse Road at the corner of Golf Road.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that discussion on
the petitioner's project was continued from the July ZBA meeting. She reviewed the petitioners' requests for
variations to the rear (south) setback: 1) locate building 16-feet from rear lot line when the Zoning Ordinance requires
a 20-foot setback; 2) allow the drive-thru lane to encroach 8-feet into the 10-foot setback; and 3) relief from
landscaping requirements to have less than a 10-foot landscape setback for portions of the.south lot line. She said that
the petitioner is seeking variations for the side (east) setback to 1) allow the drive-thru lane to encroach 6-feet into the
I O-foot setback; 2) relief from landscaping requirements to have less than a I O-foot landscape setback for portions of
the east lot line; and 3) to locate the dumpster 5.6-feet from the lot line when code requires a 10-foot setback.
Ms. Connolly explained that the petitioner revised the exhibits and that the information is for this project. She said that
the floor plan is specific to this site, the revised elevations show that the exterior of the building will be constructed of
face brick, and metal panels will be used instead of EIFS. Ms. Connotly said that the petitioner prepared a separate
landscape plan that incorporates staff's comments from the July ZBA meeting.
Ms. Connolly said that even though the landscape plan requires variations, the amount and type of landscaping used
minimizes the impa~ of the reduced setbacks, and that the plan complies with the intent of the Village regulations,
including the Corridor Design Guidelines.
Ms. Connolly said that based on the findings listed in the previous staff memo and the revised plans that the proposed
Conditional,Use request for a drive-thru would comply with the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance. In addition,
she said that the requested Variations reflect the petitioner's attempts to meet Village code requirements and create a
viable commercial center. Therefore, staff recommands approval of the requested setback and landscaping variations
reviewed and a Conditional Use for a Dunkin DonutsfBaskin Robbins with a drive-thru at 1001 S: Busse Road, Case
No. ZBA-2t-0 I, subject to the following conditions:
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-21-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
1. The speaker box cannot be used after 10 p.m., which requires that all drive-thru orders are placed at the drive-
thru window from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.
2. The entire site and building are developed in compliance with all other Village Codes.
3. The building be constructed from bricks as presented by the petitioner at the July ZBA meeting.
Ms. Juracek remarked that the revised interior drawings indicate cooking equipment. Ms. Connolly said that the
business would not be a satellite store as previously presented by the petitioner, but a full operation that includes
baking. She said that the petitioner was available to go into more detail on store operations. Ms. Juracek asked the
petitioner to present the project.
Tom Niemira was sworn in and stated that the architect, engineer, franchiser, and a representative from Dunkin Donuts
were present to answer questions.
Scott Mackay, 40 Crystal St., Cary, was sworn in. He said that he is the architect for the proposed building. He
explained the changes made to the building design, building materials, and the sign plan. He noted that they removed
the separate menu board and the drive-thru sign. He said that arrows painted on the pavement would identify the
drive-thru. Ms. Juracek asked if the arrows on the pavement would be covered by snow and ice in the winter. Mr.
Mackay said they would have regular plowing and de-icing to ensure clear directions-throughout the lot.
Keith Youngquist questioned the location of the freezer. Mr. Mackay said that the location of the freezer was integral
to the building and that it would be constructed out of the same material as the building so it would appear as part of
the building.
Jason Doland, Doland Engineering, said that the outside area of the dumpster would be covered by plantings year
round. Richard Rogers asked that taller trees replace the 36" shrubs. He said that planting 4-5' tall trees or shrubs that
grow to 6-8' would screen the dumpster more effectively. Mr. Doland said they could change the species to a taller
variety such as a columnar arborvitae.
Pat O'Brien, 9410 Lackland Court, Crystal Lake, was sworn in. Mr. O'Brien said that he is the representative from
Dunkin Donuts. He stated that the building would house Dunkin Donuts and Baskin-Robbins and would be operated
as one business with the same employees. He said that customers would be able to order any items regardless of the
customer's location in the store or drive-thru lane. He stated, that the speaker would be closed during night hours as
recommended by staff.
Richard Rogers asked if the freezer could be located entirely within the building. Mr. O'Brien said that the building
was scaled back as much as possible to fit on the site, which was small, and that the inside storage area was required
for dry products while the outdoor freezer space was needed for ice cream. He said that the freezer would be bricked-
in and completely screened.
Mr. Niemira introduced Nitin Patel, owner of the proposed franchise. Mr. Patet said that he owns the Dunkin Donuts
franchise at Elmhurst Road and Dempster. He described the proposed business and said that it would be operated 24
hours a day, 7 days a week.
Chairperson Juracek asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak about this case. As there was no response,
Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing at 7:50 and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members. She
thanked the petitioners for the revised .drawings and presentation.
Mr. Rogers said he was not in favor of the driveway being next to the neighbor's house, but that it appears that the
neighbor does not seem to mind since he did not,voice any protest. He asked that 5-6' evergreens be planted between
the driveway and the neighbor and around the dumpster. Mr. Niemira agreed to this request and said that the
landscape plan would be changed to reflect taller evergreens.
Ms. Juracek pointed out that the business would be an improvement over the vacant lot.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-21-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
Richard Rogers moved to recommend approval to the Village Board of Case No. ZBA-21-01, a request for a
Conditional Use for a drive-thru, Variations for landscape requirements and setbacks listed in the staff memo, the
conditions listed in staff's memo, and the additional conditions:
1) plant 5' tall evergreens around the dumpster,
2) Plant 5' tall evergreens along the south lot line,
3) Construct the freezer from brick face material and appear as part of the building.
Keith Youngquist seconded the motior~.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Rogers, Youngquist and Juraeek
NAYS:
Motion was approved 4-0.
At 8:45 p.m., Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by
a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary ~. '"
J'udy'Connol emoY'~lanner
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE~
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-24-2001 Hearing Date: August 23, 2001
PETITIONER: Maria Mazur
1778 Crce Lane
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
PUBLICATION DATE: August 8, 2001 Journal & To?cs
REQUEST: Conditional Use to allow a circular drive
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Fluros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Maria Mazur
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes of the July 26, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0. At 7:55, after hearing a case under Old Business, Chairperson Arlene Juracek introduced Case No.
ZBA-24-01, a request for a Conditional Use to allow a circular drive.
Sudy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly reported that staff
reviewed the petitioners' plat of survey, site plan, visited the site, and found that this request for a circular driveway
differs from other requests recently considered. The subject property does not have an unusually oversized lot width
and the proposed circular drive would require more pavement in the front yard than the amount that is characteristic of
other properties in the neighborhood. A site visit to the neighborhood confn'med that the proposed circular driveway
would not be consistent with the character of the neighborhood.
Ms. Counolly said that staff evaluated Iraffic patterns in thc neighborhood. She reported that the most recent traffic
accident in this neighborhood happened in January 1999. Also, the Police Department set up a special Traffic Detail at
the intersection of Crce and Basswood and found that traffic patterns are similar to other intersections of local streets.
She said that since the street has a standard curb and gutter configuration, the Engineering Division does not object to
the circular drive based on maintenance concerns or the impact on the existing drainage system. Ms. Connolly said
that the Forestry Division requires a 15-foot separation between the driveway and the parkway tree to ensure the ttee's
viability and that it is not damaged by the proposed circular drive.
Ms. Counolly said that the proposed circular driveway would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood, but it is
not needed as a solution to a traffic safety issue or because the street has a substandard pavement width. She said that
the petitioner's reason for the circular driveway are for convenience, but that the amount of pavement in the front yard
required for the circular drive would not be consistent with the character of the neighborhood. Therefore, the request
fails to meet the Conditional Use standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Connolly said that based on these
findings, staffrecommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to deny a Conditional Use for a
circular driveway for the residence at 1778 Cree Lane, Case No. ZBA-24-01.
Ms. luracck asked the Zoning Board members if they had questions for staff. Keith Youngquist asked for clarification
on the lot size; Ms. Connolly said that it was 9,213.6 square feet. After general discussion about the aesthetic impact
of the circular drive, Chairperson Juracek asked the petitioner to present her request.
Maria Mazur, 1778 E. Cree, was sworn in and stated that she is the mother of 23-and 21 year olds and one small child.
She said that it is very difficult to carry groceries into the house and that a circular drive up to her front door would
allow her to transport the groceries into the house more easily.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-24-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Arlene Suracek asked if she could drive into the garage and take the groceries into the house from there. Ms. Mazur
said the garage does not have an entrance into the house and that the family accesses the garage from the back'yard.
She said that there are two other circular drives in the area and that it would not be bad for the neighborhood if their
house had a circular drive, too.
Ms. Juracek asked how many cars the .family has and Ms. Mazur said there are four. She said that one car belongs to a
son who is in the army and that it is kept in the garage. She said the other part of the garage is used for storage.
At 8:10, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members.
Zoning Board members cited many reasons for their opposition to a circular drive at this address: the number of cars
parked on the cimular drive would resemble a parking lot and detract from the residential nature of the area; it would
allow the sidewalk to be blocked in two places instead of one; and that the lot was not deep enough to provide an
attractive cimular drive.
Richard Rogers moved to apprOve the request for a Conditional Use to allow a circular drive at 1778 Cree Lane, Case
No. ZBA-24-01. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES:
NAYS: Floros, Rogers, Youngquist and Juracek
Motion was denied 4-0.
At 8:45 p.m., after the Zoning Board heard another case, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith
Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swi~te~ Planning Secreta~
/u~ly-CoMpliy, 'S e~i;>r I~ muir ~,/
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-25-2001 Hearing Date: August :23, 2001
PETITIONERS: Frank and Dianne Raucci
212 Audrey Court
PUBLICATION DATE: August 8, 2001 Journal & Topics
REQUEST: Variation for a privacy fence taller than 6-feet
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Frank and Dianne Rancci
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes of the July 26, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0. At 8:15, after hearing two other cases, Chairperson Arlene Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-2$-01, a
request for a Variation for a privacy fence taller than 6-feet.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the petitioners
recently reconstructed and expanded their raised deck. As part of the project, they installed a privacy fence along a
portion of the deck. The specs for this section of the deck were not included with the building permit. She said that
the Building Inspector noted that a 9-foot privacy fence was constructed along the east section of the deck and
disapproved the final inspection of the project. While a privacy fence is a permitted structure, it must comply with
Zoning Ordinance regulations and cannot exceed 6-feet in height when measured from grade. Ms. Connolly said that
the existing privacy fence measures 9-feet from grade and that the petitioners are seeking a variation to allow the fence
to remain at its current height.
Ms. Connolly said that the petitioner was informed how the fence could be modified to comply with Village
regulations. She said that staff learned that the contractor provided the petitioner with information that called for a
privacy fence that exceeded the maximum height allowed by the Zoning Ordinance, but that this information was not
included with the Building Permit application. If it had been part of the application, staff would have notified the
contractor and homeowner that the height of the privacy fence would have to be reduced. The structure would have
been built according to Village codes or the petitioner would have sought a variation before constructing the privacy
fence.
Ms. Connolly said that staff reviewed the petitioners' plat of survey, site plan, and visited the site. She said that the
.property is a triangular shaped lot, on a cul-de-sac, that is relatively level, and out of any flood zone. The parcel is
developed with a single-family home, an attached garage, and has a 2-tiered, raised deck. The height of the deck
varies and measures 2' 10" from grade along the east elevation, ~vhich is the location of the existing privacy fence.
Ms. Connolly reiterated that the Zoning Ordinance permits privacy fences up to 6-feet in height for 18 linear feet. The
privacy fence must be located along the edge of the patio or deck. She said that in this case, the location and length of
the privacy fence comply with zoning regulations, but that the height exceeds the maximum permitted by the Zoning
Ordinance. Although the fence itself measures less than 6-feet in height, the overall height of the privacy fence
structure is measured from grade and is 9'1".
Ms. Connolly noted that the petitioners state in their application that the existing fence is necessary because their
property is an irregular shape and is on a cul-de-sac. Therefore, a taller privacy fence is needed to screen the deck
from the street. Also, the fencing material without the lattice trim measures less than 6-feet from the top of the deck
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-25-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
and that it would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. The next-door neighbor (Mary Schulz, 210 Audrey
Court) contacted staff and said that she does not object to the height of the privacy fence and stated that it was an
attractive improvement to the property.
Ms. Connolly said that the privacy fence is highly visible from the street and provides more than adequate screening
from vehicle and pedestrian traffic. While the fence would not have a negative impact on the character of the
neighborhood, public welfare, or drainage, the request fails to meet the standards for a hardship as defined by the
Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staffrecommends that the ZBA deny a Variation for a 9' 1" privacy fence
along the east elevation of the deck for the residence at 212 Audrey Court, Case No. ZBA-25-01. She said that the
Zoning Board's decision is final for this case.
Ms. Juracek commended the petitioner on the color rendering of the home showing the privacy fence, which had been
submitted with their application. Richard Rogers noted that the drawing depicts a more "airy" fence, whereas the
actual picture shows a board-on-board fence with latticework on the top and bottom, and extends from the side corner
of the house.
Ms. Juraeek noted that a fence on the first floor is measured at grade level, and asked what criteria would be used to
measure the height on a second story deck. Ms. Connolly said that any deck more than 18" high is required to have a
36" guardrail according to BOCA requirements; and after 42" it becomes a fence. She said that a second story fence
would have to be constructed in the buildable area and that the second story screening Ms. Juracek referred to would
be part of the structure.
Mike Blue said such a hypothetical case would take more consideration, but the measurement would not start at grade,
and would be considered as part of the structure.
Ms. Juracek noted that, based on her reading of fence definitions in the Zoning Code, that the structure in question is
not a fence, but part of the house. Ms. Juracek said that this is her interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance's definition
ora fence and clarified that her interpretation was not critical of staff's interpretation of the structure as being a fence.
Leo Floros said he did not agree with Ms. Juracek's interpretation and that the structure is a fence. Richard Rogers
said that the rendering makes the structure look like a fence, but the photographs show it to be more a part of the main
structure.
Keith Youngquist said that he does not have an issue with this request since the neighbors are accepting of it. He said
that he understands how it could be interpreted as part ora structure.
Diane and Frank Raucci were sworn in. Mr. Rancci said they had been residents of Mount Prospect for over 25 years.
Mrs. Raucci presented more pictures to the Zoning Board. The pictures showed their view of the neighbor's driveway
from the deck: She stated that since the deck is raised, that in order to comply with zoning regulations, the fence could
only measure 3'2" and be more of a guardrail around the deck. Mrs. Raucci said they have received many
compliments on the appearance of the new deck and fence.
Mr. Floros asked the height of the latticework and if it is removable. Mrs. Raucei said the deck is 2' 10" above grade
and uses latticework to screen the base. She said that the fence is 5'4" of solid wohlmanized wood fencing with 1.5' of
latticework on top. The Rauccis said they thought it would detract from the overall appearance if the top latticework
were removed. Zoning Board members agreed.
Ms. Juracek noted there was no one in the audience to address the Zoning Board. At 8:34, Chairperson Juracek closed
the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members Variation for a privacy fence taller than
6-feet.
Mr. Rogers said this was a very attractive addition and Ms. Juracek agreed. She said that was one of the reasons why
she scrutinized the definitions so closely and would rely on that information to persuade her to vote in favor of this
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-25-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
request. Mr. Floros said he could not support the request. He said that it is a fence and that it is higher than what is
allowed by Code.
There was discussion among the ZBA as to whether the structure was a fence or part of the house, i.e. a structure that
had to be constructed within the buildable area. ARer much discussion, Richard Rogers moved to approve the request
for a Variation for a privacy fence taller than 6-feet at 212 Audrey Court, Case No. ZBA-25-01, with the following
conditions:
1. The privacy fence must continue to meet all the requirements of the documents submitted with the petitioners'
Variation application;
2. The privacy fence cannot be longer than 8' or the length of the east elevation of the deck as shown on the
attached site plan;
3. That the uppermost part of the fence remain an open latticework as shown on the attached exhibit;
4; That the privacy fence remain attached to the house itself and be contained in the buildable area.
Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Rogers, Youngquist and Juracek
NAYS: Floros
Motion was approved 3-1. Ms. Juracek said three carries the vote so the fence has been approved.
At 8:45 p.m., Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by
a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
'"-J3~ ~o-n~ll~,,~3~n~6r Planne~; -
MINUTES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COFFEE WITH COUNCIL
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2001
9:00 A.M.
2nd Floor Conference Room, Village Hall
The meeting was convened at 9:00 a.m. Those present representing the Village Board were
Trustees Irvana Wilks and Richard Lohrstorfer. Representing staff were Assistant Village
Manager David Strahl and Director of Human Services Nancy Morgan.
Residents in Attendance:
Chris and Claude Lenz 214 N. Louis
Chuck Peterson 606 N. Prospect Manor
David Schein 512 S. NaWaTa
Joe Gattas. 12 N. Kenilworth
Carol Totorello 223 S. Elmhurst Rd.
Mr. Chris Lenz and son Claude Lenz, 214 N. Louis. Mr. Lenz wanted to praise the Village,
especially Public Works, Fire, and Police Departments and Television Services for its support of
the Historical Society's car show. He then asked about the proper manner to make a complaint
about a car blocking a sidewalk. Mr. Strahl told him to call the Polide Department or call the
Village Manager's Office. Mr. Lenz asked about the Giordano and Randhurst properties, and
Mr. Strahl told him that there was no update.
Mr. Lenz feels that the Village Board should have a final vote, for the record, on whether they
will go ahead with the Village Hall project with or without a referendum. He also raised a
concern that it appears the Village and the Library have developed a conspiracy to push the
Library project along with the Village Hall project. A lively discussion took place on these
Village Hall issues with an assurance by Trustees Wilks and Lohrstorfer that there is no
conspiracy between the two entities.
Mr. Chuck Peterson, 606 N. Prospect Manor. Mr. Peterson discussed a concern about an
annual problem of high school students speeding between 50 - 60 mph down Prospect Manor
and Highland on school days after 3:00 p.m. In the discussion, Trustees Wilks and Lohrstorfer
felt police need to monitor speeding at this location, as well as suggested that this issue should be
brought up at the Safety Commission. Mr. Peterson also discussed the problem of students
parking on the streets in the neighborhood. He suggested the use of parking stickers to help
relieve the situation.
Mr. Peterson raised a concern about a specific house being like an "Animal House*'. Mr. Strahl
told him that the Village is aware and is working to improve this situation. Mr. Peterson also
raised a concern about the need for a "No Left Turn" sign at the new Dunkin Donuts/Baskin '
Robins at Busse and Golf. He was told the State would be grinding out the road medium.
r. David Schein, 512 S. NaWaTa. Mr. Schein said that he was given a confusing answer by
the Mount Prospect Police Department when he called about dead birds residents suspect have
the West Nile Vires. He had two dead crows that were double bagged in this car trunk. While
Mr. Strahl was on the phone in an effort to straighten out the confusion, a discussion took place
about the West Nile Virus. Mr. Strahl informed the group that because there are enough dead
birds from the area, we do not need further testing. Mr. Schein may dispose of the dead birds in
the Village dumpster.
Mr. Joe Gattas, 12 N. Kenilworth. Mr. Gattas came to the meeting to discuss the dead bird
issue. The dead birds that Mr. Schein had in this trunk were from Mr. Gattas' mothers front
yard.
Ms. Carol Totorello, 223 S. Elmhurst Rd. Ms. Totorello mentioned that the traffic signal on
Southbound on Rt. 83 and Council Trails Rd. has not been replaced to which Mr. Strahl made
note.
Trustee Irvana Wilks armotmced that she attended State Representative Terry Park's meeting
on grant information, and she will distributed this information to the board. She also mentioned
that she had copies of the "Handbook of Illinois Government" booklet, which she thought was
very informative.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy ~org~~CSW
Human Services Director
H:IqLOlJCoffee with Council 9/8/01