Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/07/1958 VB minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING, MT. PROSPECT, ILLINOIS ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1958 The meeting was called to order at 8:39 P. M. by President Lams and the Clerk was then directed to call the roll. On roll call, the following answered "Present": Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver, Willer and President Lams. Ail trustees having previously received copies of the minutes of the meeting held September 23, 1958, Trustee Willer moved that the minutes be accepted as submitted, seconded by Trustee Casterline, The President put the question and the Clerk ca11 ed the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried and said minutes approved. It was moved by Trustee Airey and seconded by Trustee Casterline that the bills for the period ending October 7th in the amount of $60,162.74 be approved for payment. The President put the ques~n and the Clerk caqled the roll, with the following response: Ayes, Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried and said b41qs approved. Village Manager Apple~y then read a letter from the Department of Highways regarding ~d limit zone on Lincoln Street: Speed limit September 24, 1958 ,signs on Er. H. G. Appleby, Manager Lincoln V~l]age of Mt. Prospect Street Dear Er. Appleby: Re: Speed Limit Zone - Lincoln Street Confirming our conversation of yesterdsy, the Cook County Highway Department is obligated by Senate Bill 96 of the 70th General Assembly of the State of Tllinois to establish speed limit zones on roadways under its maintenance jurisdiction. The Bill prescribes the method of making the stud~ and we must conform to the procedures outlined by the Illinois Department of Public Works & Buildings. The speed of 35 miles per hour on Lincoln Street was established on this basis, and under the existing law, we cannot justify a lower speed. It is ~y personal opinion, knowing the area, that 35 miles per hour is too fast for Lincoln Street. The real problem, however, is that Lincoln Stree~t, again m~ opinion, should be a Village street and not part of the State Aid S~stem. Lincoln Street was added to our State Aid System of Highways in 19h2, over m~ objection. The Street at that time was a non-descript gravel road, and by virtue of adding it to our State Aid System, it was paved out of Motor Fuel Tax Funds, rather than by special assessment to the property owners along and near Lincoln Street. I cautioned the Village officials at that time that the addition of this street to our system would make it a highway, and by law must be maintained and operated as a highway. The Solutibn to this problem is to have the Village Board of Mount Prospect petition the Cook County Board of Commissioners to remove Lincoln Street from our State Aid System and place the section within the Village under the jurisdiction of that agency. Recently we improved Railroad Avenue between Mount Prospect Road and Emerson Street, and I believe in the near future similar problems will arise on that street. I sincerely regret that by law I am not permitted to grant your request and I trust that your Board .w~l consider my suggestion of petitioning the Cook County Board of Commmssioners for permissibn to place both Lincoln Street and Railroad Avenue under the jurisdiction of the Village, thereby permitting the Village to determine speed limits and take other necessary regulatory action con~nensurate with the operation of a v~l lage street. Yours very truly, S/ William J. Mortimer Superintendent of Highways Cook County, Illinois October 7, 1958 emoval of It was moved by Trustee Wilier and seconded by Trustee Norris Lincoln St. that the Village of Mt. Prospect petition the Cook County Board of from State Commissioners to remove Lincoln Street from our State Aid System and aid thereby have the Village of Mt. Prospect maintain control over this street. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. Prospect Ave. It was moved by Trustee Willer ~nd seconded by Trustee Norris to remain that the Village Manager direct a letter to Mr. Mortimer of the Depsrtment under State of Highways, explaining that the Village of Mt. Prospect wishes to have jurisdiction RaLlroad Avenue (Prospect Avenue) between Mt. Prospect Road and Emerson Street remain under the jurisdiction of the Department of Highw~s. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried.~ Village Manager Apple~ry had previously read the following letter from the Department of Highways: September 19, 1958 Honorable President & Board of Village Trustees, Mt. Prospect, Ill. Improvement of Re: Central Road, Arlington Heights Road to Central Road Northwest Highway --Widening, Resurfacing and Reconstruction to h~'. Section ll?-1618 Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith is a copy of the paving plan for the subject i~orovemen~ to be constructed in the Village of Mount Prospect for your spproval and comment. It is the policy of the Board of Co~missioners of Cook County and this Department to advise the officials of a municipality of a contexplsted project within their Village, City or Town limits, for the p~trpose of general information as well as the effect the in.provement will have on their existing utilities. We reapectf~lly request that you adopt and approve the necessary resolution for this project. Two (2) copies of a resolution that m~y be used are enclosed. If any utility adjustments are necessary, it is suggested that one of two methods of accoEplishing the adjustments be selected by you. The first method is to accomplish the necessary adjustments with City, Village or Town forces and the costs incurred therefor to be reimbursed by Cook County after an audit of the bills for the work involved has been approved. The second method which generally has been selected by the municipalities throughout Cook County is to incorporate the necessary utility adjustment costs in our general construction contract which incidentally involve no cost to the municipality-. If the second method is chosen, please state that you do not have the necessary forces to make the proposed utility adjustments. This improvement will be paid for with Motor Fuel Tax Funds of Cook County. Therefore, it is necessary ~hat we make certain the Highws~v ~-~ Fund will be spent to provide for the most efficient movement of vehicles and relief of traffic congestion, and not for the construction of expensive parking areas. In view of the above, we urge that your Board of Trustees pass an ordinance, a copy of which is attached, to Prohibit Parking on Central Road, within the limits of the Village of Mount Prospect between East of Arthur Avenue to Northwest Highwsy. In order to assure early construction of this improvement, it is respectfully requested that your approval and copy of the resolution, method of performing utility adjustments and no parking ordinance be for- warded to this office at the earliest possible date. Thanking you for your intmediate attention in this matter, I am Very truly yours, 0¢tober 7, 1955 S/ William J. Mortimer The Clerk then read Proposed Resolution 22-58: Res. 22-58 RESOLUTION 22-58: A RESOLUTION WHICH DEALS WITH Improvement of IMPROVEMENT OF CENTRAL ROAD ~entral Road It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Broad that Proposed Resolution 22-58 be adopted. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees ~irey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays: None. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried and Resolution 22-58 adopted. Clerk Reynolds read Proposed Ordinance No. 628: 'Ordinance #628 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PARKING ON CENTRAL ROAD Prohibiting IN THE VILLAGE OF ~. PROSPECT parking on Central Road It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Casterline that Proposed Ordinance No. 628 be passed. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. ' Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the ordinance passed. It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Broad that the Village Manager be directed to notify Mr. Mortimer of the Department of Highways that the Board approves the second method outlined in his letter of September 19, 1958, in which the necessary utility adjustment costs are incorporated in the general construction contract which involves no cost to the municipality. The President put the question aud the motion was carried by acclamation. The Clerk read the following letter from Prospect Meadows Prospect Sanitary District: Meadows ),]2 West Foundry Road Sanitary Mt. Prospect, Illinois District on October 2, 1958 annexations Mt. Prospect Village Board Honorable President and Members: The Board of Trustees of the Prospect Meadows Sanitary District requests that it be consulted on matters of annexation, rezoning or the like on any properties that fall within its boundaries and wherein such requests are directed to your body. The boundaries of the Prospect Meadows Sanitary District are houndaries defined as follows: Rand Road, Elmhurst Road (Rte. 83) Foundry Road, Forest Avenue and Euclid Avenue Your co-operation wi~ be appreciate~. For the Board of Trustees S/ Kenneth ~. Larson, Clerk It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Schlaver that the Village Manager be directed to notify the Prospect Meadows Sanitary District that the Village of Mt. Prospect w~ql be glad to co-operate with their request. The President put the questiom and the motion was carried by acclamation. It was moved by Trustee Broad and seconded by Trustee Wi 1 q er Arc Dis- that a scavenger's permit be granted Arc Disposal Company, 5859 North posal Co. River Road, Des Plaines, Illinois. The President put the question Garbage and the motion was earried by acclamation. The Clerk read the following letter from Donald A. Willis of the Northeast Home Owners Association: September 26, 1958 President and Board of Trustees Village of Mt. Prospect, Illinbis Gentlemen: Donald A. Willis Protest At the September 23, 1958 meeting of the Village Board an unfortunate October 7, 1958 incident occurred when an officer of the Northwest Home Owners Leage, while exercising a citizens prerogative to question elected officials, was charged several times by Trustee Raymond L. Wilier as bein~ a "Rabble-Rouser". The question that was asked by Mr. Michael Mokate was presented to the Board in a proper and gentlemanly manner that did not at all warrant such discourteous reply. Perhaps Trustee Willer was upset by previous questions put to the Board by Mr. Mokate and by an officer of the Northeast Home Owners Association, but regardless of his inner feelings, his position as Trustee, an elective office, does not give him the right to personally abuse any citizen, particularly one who represents property owners of a sizable area of Mount Prospect. At a mass meeting held jointly on March lC, 1958 by the Northeast Home Owners Association and the Northwest Home Owners League to discuss the Mount Prospect Storm Relief Sewer Program, all Village Officials were given an ample opportunity to answer questions from property owners served by the Feehanville Drainage District. The writer, acting as chairman, made every effort to conduct an orderly meeting despite the heated feelings of the 300 people present. A single discourteous out- burst from a citizen toward a Village Official was directed from the floor to Trustee Willer, but it was followed immediately by an apology from another citizen. Under the circumstances of the September 23, 1958 incident, this Association requests an apology to the President of the Northwest Home Owners League from either Trustee Willer or President Lams so that a precedent will not be set for future incidents of this nature. This memorandum was approved by a unanimous Vote of the Membership of the Northeast Home Owners Association at its regular meeting on September 25, 1958. Ver~ truly yours, S/ Donald A. Willis- No apology The President indicated that a Trustee had the right to express himself as any other citizen. Trustee Willer stated that he did not feel any apology was needed. Ernst & Ernst It was moved by Trustee Airey and seconded by Trustee Casterline report that the Auditor's report of Ernst & Ernst, dated April 30, 1958, be approved and placed on file. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. Trustee Casterline submitted the report of the Police Magistrate for August, 1958 and requested that it be placed on file. Lattof - Trustee Casterline outlined the submitted agreement of Lattof Police car Motor Sales Company of Arlington Heights, Illinois, regarding rental of Rental police cars. It was moved by Trustee Casterline and seconded by Trustee Willer that the Board approve the agreement with Lattof Motor Sales Company, Arlington Heights, Illinois, regsrding squad car rentals, as set forth in their letters of June 24, 1958 and September ~5~ 1958 addressed to Village Manager Appleby. The President put the question and the Clerk c~l~ed the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and ~iller. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. ~ Trustee Casterline commended the Police for the good care taken of the cars. T~ustee Willer complimented those presenting cases to t he Board of Appeals, and the Board of Appeals were likewise complimented because of the completeness of their recent reports. 8ctober 7, 1958 Ordinance #629 Ordinance #629 American Legion Trustee Wilier read Proposed Ordinance No. 629: American Legion Property Property Annexed AN ORDINANCE TO ~NEX AMERICAN LEGION PROPERTY 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD Trustee Broad registered disagreement to the passage Of this ordinance because the existing building does not conform with the Building Code specifications for B-3 classifications. It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Norris that proposed Ordinance #629 be passed. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Wilier. Nays: Trustee Broad. Whereupon the President declared the ordinance passed. Trustee Willer read proposed Ordinance No. 630: Ordinance #630 American Legion AN ORDINANCE ZONING THE AMERICAN LEGION PROPERTY Prope2ty Zoned AS B-3 It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Schlaver that Proposed Ordinance No. 630 be passed providing that the petition csrry a covenant running along with the land, said covenant to state that in case the prQperty changes hands or there is s change in the use of the property, said property is to immediately revert to R-1 zoning. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Casterline, Norris, Sch_laver and ~lller. Nays, Trustee Broad. Wheret~oen the President declared the Ordinance No. 630 passed. Trustee Willer read the following letter frcm Allan Bloch, attorney for Brickman Builders: Brickman, s Maplecrest ~ September 30, 1958 Land Dedicatioz Mr. R. Wil~er, Judiciary Committee ~" Village of Mt. Prospect Dear Mr. Willer: As you are aware, I have been endeavoring for many months to obtain an execution of the plat of the Maplecrest Subdivision, and Mr. McCoy has been endeavoring also to obtain an execution of the plat for Brickman Manor. At one time, we were informed that no acreage was desired by the Park District, and it was recommended that the Brickman Company pay cash in lieu of land dedication, which we agreed to. It was thereafter suggested that we dedicate land instead of money. In the meantime, revisions of the plat were required and then later a legend was proposed to be placed on the plat, which we prepared, It now appears that some members of the Board feel that the Maplecrest property, with its frontage on Rand Road, is so valuable that the amount of cash previously set by the Plan Com~ission was inadequate. In order to finally dispose of this matter, and in view of the sentiment of the Board, and in the hope that by the disposition we propose in this letter, we will gain some appreciation and co-operation from the ViLlage, I am authorized by Mr. Brickman to make the following suggestion to the Board of Trustees: (a) .~Mr. Brickman will convey to the Village 1.58 acres of the Maplecrest Subdivision, having about 200 ft. of frontage on Rand Road. This property is indicated on the enclosed plat. (b) The Board of Trustees will have the Village approve the plats of Maplecrest Subdivision and Brickman Manor as submitted. October 7, 1958 We have .made the following co~outations in order to explain the acreage: The plat calls for sixty-six family units, which, at the Maplecrest rate of si~ty units per acre, would result in a donation, land de&i- under the Ordinance, to the Village of 1.lO acres. The cation remainder of the Maplecrest Subdivision, less the dedication, constitutes 1.42 acres, 10% of which equals In the Brickman' Subdivision there are ll4 lots which, at sixty lots per acre, would equal 1.9 acres to be dedicated. Our understanding is that one-half of this dedication is 1/2 land de&i- to go to the Feehanville School District No. 25, and .that cation from one-half of the dedication will go to Mt. Prospect, which Brickmau Manor would be . 95 acres in the Brickman Manor Subdivision. Since it appears to be the position of everyone, (in which we concur) that the land in Maplecrest on Rand Road is at least three times as valuable as the land in Brickman Manor, this would give the Village .32 acres in Maplecrest. In this way, it is possible to give one tract of land, rather than reduce the acreage in Maplecrest and giv~ a small area in Brickman Manor. You will note, therefore, that the total acreage as figured above is 456 acres. Although the ordinance requires dedication for public use, it is not proposed by Mr. Brickman to require the Village to use this land only for a park. As we' understand, the Village may desire to sell this property for commercial use in the future, and the deed, therefore, to the Village would not restrict the use of the ~poperty to park purposes. I should think that the above suggestion meets the various objections previously raised to the execution of the Maplecrest and Brickman Manor Subdivision plats, and I hope this matter can be concluded at the next Board meeting. Very truly yours, S/ Allan R. Bloch It was moved by Trustee Broad and seconded by Trustee Willer to accept land dedication in the amount of 1.28 acres in connection with Maplecrest Subdivision. The meeting was recessed for a ten-minute period. When the meeting reconvened, Trustees Broad and Willer withdrew the above motion and second. It was then moved by Trustee Broad and seconded by Trustee Willer that the Village accept 1.58 acres for land dedication both in Maplec.rest Subdivision and Brickman Manor. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Scl~laver and Willer. Nays, none. 'Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. Maplecrest It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Broad plat that upon receipt of a proper deed and plat covering 1.58 acres as out- lined in the submitted plat, the President and Village Clerk be authorized to sign the plat of Msplecrest Subdivision. The President put the qaastion and the Clerk ca21ed the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Where- upon the President declared the motion carried. Sign Brickman It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Norris plat that upon receipt of the proper deed of the above mentioned land dedication that the President and Village Clerk be authorized to sign the plat of Brickman Manor Subdivision. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes, Trustees Airey, Broad, Caste~line, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Where.upon the President declared the motion carried. Trustee Willer read the following letter: October 3, 1958 President & Board of Trustees Mt. Prospect, Illinois Frank Serafine' s Thir d Gentle men: Addition The Plan Commission, to whom was referred the proposed plat of toner 7, 1958 the Resubdivision of Lot 1 in Block 1 in Frank Serafine's Third Addition for study and recommendation, recommend to the Village Board that the proposed plat be approved aft er the plat has been corrected to show the building setback lines. Respectfully submitted, Mt. Prospect Plan Commission S/ A. C. Dresser, Chairman S/ H. G. Appleby, Secretary It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Norris that the Board concur with the Plan Commission's recommendation regarding the resubdivision of Lot i in Block i in Frank Serafinets Third Addition and that the President and the Clerk be authorized to sign the plat in behalf of the Village. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: ~yes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. The following letter had been previously read by Village Manager Land Appleby: ., Dedication Golfhurst September 23, 1958 Mr. Theodore Lams, President of the Board of Trustees Village Hall, Mt. Prospect, Ill. Dear Sir:~ Re: Petition for Annexation of following described · property: Lot 3 in Owners Subdivision of Section 13, Twp 41 North, R ll, E 3rd PM, in Cook County, Illinois On behalf of the petitinners in~ the above-described petition for annexation and as their duly authorized attorney and agent, this letter is directed to you in connection with Paragraph 5 of the above-described petition consisting of our proposal to make a contribution in the sum of $6,000 to the Village of Mt. Pro~ect, in lieu of land dedication for public use. We made a payment of the sum of $3,000 at the time this Payment in lieu petition was presented. The balance of $3,000 we propose to pay on of land or before the construction of homes has been commenced on 50% of the lots in this subdivision and this letter will serve as our commitment so to do. Cordially and Respectfully, S/ Jacob B. Courshon It was moved by Trustee ~Yiller and seconded by Trustee Casterline that th~ amount of $3,000 in the form of a note to be paid i~ 120 days at 4% interest be accepted by the Village of Mt. Prospect, to be paid in lieu of land dedication for Golfhurst Subdivision. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and ~^~iller. Nays, Trustees ~irey and Broad. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. It was then moved by Trustee ~iller and seconded by Trustee Norris that the Village Attorney be directed to prepare an ordinance annexing the subdivision known as Golfhurst Subdivision. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Sc~-laver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. Mr. Courshon stated frc~ the floor that he would like unanimous approval regarding the acceptance of moneys in lieu of land dedication. Trustees Broad and Airey registered the objection that the normal method of payment has always been cash. Mr. Courshon indicated that he would be willing to make such a cash payment. October 7, 1958 It was moved by Trustee Wilier and seconded by Trustee Caster- line to reconsider the motion previously made regardiug acceptance of a note of $3,000 to be paid in lieu of land dedication for Golfh~rst Subdivision. The President put the question and the motion was carried by accia~ation. It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Broad to amend the motion rega~m~ding acceptance of a note as follows: "that the amount of $3,000 payable forthwith be accepted by the Village of Mt. Prospect in lieu of land dedication for Golfhurst Subdivision". The President put the question and the Clark called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. Golfh~rst It was moved by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Broad to accept the amended motion. The President put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. Village receives Mr. Courshon requested to know to whom the check should be ½ land dedi- made payable. President Lams stated that the original $3000 was made cation fund payable to the Park District but was deposited in ~_the Golfhurst Estate Park receivesEscrow Fund by the Village. He told Mr° Courshon to make the second half $3,000 check payable to the Park District. It was noted that the Village was to receive half of the total $6,000~ with the other half going to the Park District. Trustee Willer then read the following letter from the Plan Conanission: Elk Ridge October 3, 19~8 Villa President & Board of Trustees Di Mucci Village of Mt. Prospect Mt. Prospect, Illinois Gentlemen: The Plan Com~ssion to whom the plats of survey of land proposed to be deeded for public use by Salvatore Di Mucci in connecti~on with Unit No. i of Elk Ridge Villa were referred for study and recom- mendation, recommend to the Village Board that the prspose~ dedications be declared not acceptable for the reasons that: Land dedi- cation (1) Area proposed to be dedicated on the west side of Linneman Road includes the road which has already been dedicated and therefore does not contain the required 2.2~ acres. (2) The suggested area on the east side of Linneman Road is not acceptable in the opinion of the Plan Commission due to its location. (3) Neither of the areas suggested are presently conveniently accessible to the area of Elk Ridge Vil5 a now being platted as Unit No. 1. Respectfully submitted, S/. A. C. Dresser, Chairman S/ H. G. Appleby, ~Secretary This letter was referred to the Judiciary Con~ittee for further study. October 7, 1958 It was moved by Trustee Broad and seconded by Trustee Septic tanks Casterline that the Village Attorney be dire~t~ ed to prepare an ordin- ordinance ance amending the municipal code to eliminate the requirement that septic tanks be installed except in areas from which the combined sewer is not connected to the Sanitary District Interceotor Sewer. The President put the question and the Clerk called the-roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and Willer. Nays, none. Wheretloon the President declared the motion carried. Trustee Norris reported that he felt Load Limit recommen- Load limits dations should be secured on all types of streets (A-3, 1-11, and for streets - Concrete) Trustee Schlaver co~nended the Fire Department for the fine program which they presented during Fire Prevention ~geek. Trustee Schlaver said that he felt the Board should be consulted Hiring regarding the hiring of an assistant village manager. Village Manager employees Appleby stated that the appointment was not in the form of an assistant village manager , but as a trainee. (Cliff Peterson). It was moved by Trustee i¢iller, and seconded by Trustee Broad Permits of that the Village Manager be authorized in behalf of the Village, at his Metropoli- discretion, to sign permits of the Metropolitan Sanitary District as they tan Sani- may arise from time to time. The President put the question, the Clerk tary Distr. called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and ~iller. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried. It was moved by Trustee Norris and seconded by Trustee Broad that proposed Resolution 23-58 be adopted: Res. Mft. 13-CS A RESOLUTION REGARDLNG ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS UNDER Ioka Parkway MFT 13-CS, CENTER PARKW~f ON ~iOKA STRE~ The President put the Ruestion and the Clerk called the roll, with the following response: Ayes: Trustees Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver and ~iller. Nays, none. Whereupon the President declared the motion carried and Resolution 23-~8 adopted. It was moved by Trustee Broad and seconded by Trustee Norris to adjourn the regular meeting, which was carried by acclamation, and the meeting was regularly adjourned at 11:56 P M. Respectfully submitted, Village Clerk October 7, 1958