HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 08/21/2001Next Ordinance No. 5207
Next Resolution No. 49-01
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday
50 South Emerson Street August 21, 2001
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Irvana Wilks
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Michael Zadel
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Lohrstorfer
IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Wilks
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 2001
VI. *APPROVE BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
(To be considered under Consent Agenda)
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit A)
This ordinance amends Chapter 13 of the Village Code by decreasing the number
of Class "S" liquor licenses by one, Bella Capri Restaurant at 1724 West Golf Road,
and increasing the number of Class XX liquor licenses by one, for the same restaurant.
B. Appointments
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064.
IX. CONSENT AGENDA
'bAll items listed with an asterisk are considered routine by the Village Board and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of those items unless a
Board member, or resident from the audience, so requests, in which event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
X. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 15-01,418 S. Na-Wa-Ta Avenue, Residence
2"d reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 418 SOUTH NA-WA-TA AVENUE (Exhibit B)
This ordinance grants a variation for an unenclosed, covered porch to
encroach into the exterior side yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals
has recommended approval by a vote of 4-0.
B. ZBA 19-01,350 S. We-Go Trail, Residence
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 350 SOUTH WE-GO TRAIL (Exhibit C)
This ordinance grants a variation to allow for the construction of an attached
garage which will encroach into the rear side yard. The Zoning Board of
Appeals has recommended denial by a vote of 3-2, therefore a super-majority
vote is required by the Village Board for approval.
C. 2"d reading of AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE
ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING
JANUARY 1, 2001 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31,2001 (Exhibit D)
Xl. NEW BUSINESS
A. *PC 11-01, Garland's Subdivision, 2233 S. Busse Road
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISlON FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2233 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD (Exhibit E)
This plat creates two lots of record by subdividing an existing lot. The Plan
Commission has recommended approval with a vote of 3-0.
B. *A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO
ADOPT AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MOUNT PROSPECT
SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 FOR GOVERNMENT ACCESS CABLE TV SERVICE
PRODUCTION (Exhibit F)
Xll. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. 2001 CDBG Sidewalk program
2. Request approval to authorize IDOT to:
a. Accept Madam Construction Bid for Train Depot Parking Lot
Rehabilitation and Straetscape Phase I1.
b. Process Change Order No. 1.
c. Authorize Mayor to sign the Amended Joint Agreement with
IDOT based on the Martam Construction Bid.
B. Request for Board authorization to issue $10 million of general obligation bonds
to fund a portion of the cost of construction of a new village hall/community center
and parking garage.
XlII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XlV. ADJOURNMENT
MAYOR ~,b VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E. lanonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
Timothy J. Corcoran Vehna W. Lowe
Paul Wm. Hoefert
Richard M. Lohrstorfer
Miehaele W. Skowron Phone: (847) 392-6000
Irvana K. Wilks Fo.x: (847) 392-6022
Michael A. ZadeI TDD: (847) 392-6064
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
MINUTES FROM THE
AUGUST 7, 2001
VILLAGE BOARD MEETING
ARE DEFERRED UNTIL
SEPTEMBER 4, 2001
VILLAGE OF MOUNT pROSPECT
BUDGET REVENUE
&
EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES
January 1 ~ July 31, 2001
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Month, { 58.3~) Complete~
5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
Budget Revenue S~a~
01/01/01 ~ 0~/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
RE%~ BY CLASSIFICATION
PROPERTY TAXES 25,855 4,487,548 10,101,003 5,613,455 55.6
OTHER TA/(ES 1,294,756 10,471,746 17,626,375 7,184,629 40.6
LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 198,178 2,373,271 3,085,900 712,629 23.1
INTERGOVERMENT REV. 781,603 4,607,260 10,648,066 6,040,806 56.7
CHARGES FOR SERVICE 1,086,569 7,112,127 12,861,980 5,749,853 44.7
FINES AND FORFEITS 33,516 232,808 510,000 277,192 54.4
IN~;ESTMENT INCOME 436,925 2,484,545 5,338,687 2,851,142 53.4
REIMBURSEMENTS 55,586 296,468 602,656 306,188 50.8
OTHER REVENUE 136,468 1,722,840 3,144,308 1,421,468 48.2
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 1,091,869 17,351,970 16,260,105 93.7
Total All Funds 4,049,456 36,880,478 81,267,945 46~387,467 57.1
REVENUE BY FUND
GENEP3%L FUND 1,846,079 16,633,008 28,000,810 11,367,802 40.6
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 94,963 1,686,745 3,366,840 1,680,095 49.9
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND - .- 133,483 951,320 1,641,150 689,830 42.0
LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 30 175 0 -175
COMMUNITY DEVELpMNT BLOCK GRNT 79 56,733 499,376 442,643 88.6
pUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 454 52,180 118,062 65,882 55.8
REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B 3,286 253,656 565,866 312,210 55.2
G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,283,900 2,283,900 100.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPM~T B&I 1993A 2,001 195,090 391,635 196,545 50.2
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT E&I 1996B 356 71,378 144,482 73,104 50.6
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 78 26,499 53,962 27,463 50.9
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 2,549 317,796 316,164 -1,632 -0.5
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 0 0 0 0
REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993B 24,047 171,883 285,899. 114,016 39.9
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 14,269 102,179 169,772 67,593 39.8
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 17,787 127,315 211,482 84,137 39.8
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 5,795 41,839 69,609 28,070 40.3
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 295 77,146 155,618 78,472 50.4
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 58,896 424,028 703,761 279,733 39.7
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 879 7,263 9,868 2,605 26.4
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 45,564 325,425 538,778 213,353 39.6
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 9,271 66,261 111,008 44,747 40.3
STREET IMPROVB & I 1998A 33,653 240,912 404,647 163,735 40.5
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 13,985 675,896 2,704,017 2,028,121 75.0
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 0 0
SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND 0 0 13,213,500 13,213,500 100.0
C~PITAL IMPROVEMEN~ CONST FUND 639 5,693 4,600 -1!093 -23.8
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 50,205 917,533 ~ 949,000 431,467 45.5
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 187,031 1,581,840 2,317,933 736,093 31.8
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 18,667 136,045 1,112,200 976,155 87.8
WATER AND SEWER FUND 491,276 3,924,100 7~849,350 3,925,250 50.0
PARKING SYSTEM BEVEbUJE FUND 147,862 2~4,726 877,400 622,674 71.0
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FU~ 95,875 671,741 !~14~!301 477,560 41.6
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 90,868 667,468 ~133f840 466,372 41.1
o5~o~2ool VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ? Months ( 59.3% ) ¢~pleted
11:37:45 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
Budget Revenue Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
C~r MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 11,393 80,482 132,099 51,617 39.1
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 317~242 2,172,816 3,785,640 1,612,824 42.6
POLICE PENSION FUND 158,894 1,110,246 2,929,601 1,819,355 62.1
FIRE PENSION FUND 170,120 1,229,868 3,022,180 1,792,312 59,3
BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND 237 2,025 5,000 2,975 59.5
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 870 870 0 -870
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA ~6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 478 20,598 39,625 19,027 48.0
Total All Funds 4,049,456 84,880,478 81,267,945 46,387,467 87.1
08/10/2001 ~ 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
~:39:~9 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUMo21 Budget Revenue by Cat~6~ within Fund Summary
os/os/os - o7/3s/os
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
GENERAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 18,605 3,I17,351 7,011,234 3,893,883 55.5
41 OTNER TAXES 916,458 6,639,896 10,876,000 4,236,104 38.9
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 192,483 2,167,076 2,848,500 681,424 23.9
43 INTER~OVERMENT REV. 527,895 3,351,178 5,209,440 1,898,267 35.7
44 CMARGES FOR SERViCB 95,500 417,787 673,652 255,865 38.0
45 FIRES A~D FORFEITS 33,516 232,808 510,000 277,192 54.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 44,932 334,073 435,000 100,927 23.2
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 4,375 214,082 298,309 84,227 28.2
48 OTHER REVENUE 12,315 158,762 138,675 -20,087 -14.5
TOT~LGENERAL FUND 1,846,079 16,633,008 28,000,810 11,367,802 40.6
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 5,710 1,079,004 2,431,590 1,352,586 55.6
44 C~ARGBS FOR SERVICE - i' 82,791 551,556 875,250 323,694 37.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 6,133 55,856 60,000 4,144 6.9
48 OTHER REVENUE 329 329 0 -229
TOT~,LREFUSE DISPOSAL FL~D 94,963 1,686,748 8,366,840 1,680,095 49.9
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
43 INTERGOV~RMENT REV. 123,708 876,087 1,591,000 714,913 44.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 8,564 71,324 50,000 -21,324 -42.6
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 1,211 3,909 150 -3,759 ****.*
TOTAL MOTOR P~IEL TAX F%TND 183,483 951,320 1,641,180 689,880 42.0
LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GP3%NT
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 30 175 0 -175
TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 20 175 0 -175
COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRMT
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 429,276 429,276 100.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 79 215 100 -115 -115.0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 56,518 70,000 13,482 19.3
TOTAL CO~4UNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK ~P, NT 79 56,723 499,376 442,648 88.6
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A
40 PROPERTY TA/fES 271 51,132 115,016 63,884 55.5
46 I~IVESTMENT INCOME 183 1~048 3,046 1,998 65.6
TOTAL PUBLIC WORMS FACILTY B&I 1987A 454 52. i180 ~18,062 65,882 55.8
REFLIND 87B & 91A B&I 1993E
40 PROPERTY TAXES 1,269 240,061 543,163 303,102 55.8
46 I~;VESTMENT INCOME 0,017 13;595 22,703 9,108 40.1
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 98.3% ) Completed
11:39:19 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
suM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unrecelved Unreceived
ReCeived Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B 3,286 253,656 565,966 312,210 55.2
G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 10,400 10,400 100.0
49 OTHER FINANCIRG SOURCES 0 0 2,273,500 2,273,900 100.0
TOTALS. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,283,900 2,283,900 100.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A
41 OTRER TAXES 0 181,702 370,000 188,298 50.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,001 13,388 21,635 8,247 38.1
49 OTRER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 2,001 195,090 391,636 196,545 50.2
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B - ~'
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 68,752 140,000 71,248 50.9
46 INVESTMERT INCOME 356 2,626 4,482 1,856 41.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDE~LOPMNT B&I 1996B 386 71,378 144,482 73,104 50.6
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B
41 OTHER TA~XES 0 26,028 53,000 26,972 50.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 78 471 962 491 51.0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 78 26,499 53,962 27,468 50.9
DOWNTOWN REDEVL E & I 1999
41 OTRER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,549 17,796 16,164 -1,632 -10.1
49 OTHER FIRANCIRG SOURCES 0 300,000 300,000 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I I999 2,549 317,796 316,164 -1,632 -0.5
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL E&I 1992A 0 0 0 0
REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B
41 OTRER TAXES 23,201 166,776 276,000 109,224 39.6
48 IN-VESTMENT INCOME 846 5,107 9,899 4,792 48.4
49 OTRER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
11:39:19 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMO21 Budget Revenue bY categ6~ within Fund Suaunary
os/os/os - OT/3S/os
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL REFUNDINO FLOOD 91A B&I 19938 24,047 171,883 285,899 114,016 39.9
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 13,870 99,703 165,000 65,297 39.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 399 2,476 4,772 2,296 48.1
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 14,269 102,179 169,772 67,593 39.8
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A
41 OTHER T~-XEE 17,300 124,357 205,800 81,443 39.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 487 2,958 5,652 2,694 47.7
TOTAL FL00D CONTROL B&I 1996A 17,787 127,315 211,452 84,137 39.8
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I
41 OTHER TAXES - ~ 5,716 41,090 68,000 26,910 39.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 79 449 1,609 1,160 72.1
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTA~FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 6,795 41,839 69,609 28,070 40.3
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 74,793 152,300 77,507 50.9
48 INVESTMENT INCOME 295 2,353 3,318 965 29.1
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 295 77,146 155,618 78,472 50.4
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 58,592 421,170 697,000 275,830 39.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 304 2,858 6,761 3,903 57.7
TOTAL HPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 68,896 424,028 703,761 279,733 39.7
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 879 7,263 9,868 2,605 26.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 879 7,263 9,868 2,605 26.4
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 43,376 311,798 516,000 204,202 39.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,188 13,627 22,778 9,151 40.2
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 45,564 325,428 538,778 213,359 39~6
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES 8,971 64,485 106,717 42,232 39.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 300 1,776 4,291 2,515 58.6
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 9,271 66,261 111,008 44,747 40.3
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
11:39:19 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unrecelved
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A
41 OTHER TAXES 33,121 238.079 394,000 155,921 39.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 832 2,833 10,647 7,814 73.4
TOTAL STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 33,653 240,912 404,647 163,735 40.5
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
45 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 250,000 1,753,350 1,503,350 85.7
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 13,985 104,911 60,000 -44,911 -74.9
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 208,197 208,197 100.0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 40,500 40,500 100.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND I3,985 675,896 2,704,017 2,028,121 75.0
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLD~ CONST FUND 0 0 0
SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 62,000 62,000 100.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 13,151,500 13,151,500 100.0
TOTAL EBRiBS 2001 PROJECT FUND 0 0 13,213,500 13,213,500 100.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COMST FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 639 5,693 4,600 -1,093 -23.8
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 659 5,693 4,600 -1,093 -23.8
DOWNTOWN REDBVLP~T CONST
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 205 754 24,000 23,246 96.9
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 50.000 68,424 0 -68,424
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 448,355 925,000 476,645 51.5
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 50,208 517,533 949,000 431,467 45.5
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
41 OTEER TAXES 164,579 1,254,212 1,955,933 701,721 35.9
42 LICENSES, PEPJ4ITS & FEES 5,395 204,095 232,000 27,905 12.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 17,057 123,533 130,000 6,467 5.0
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 187,081 1,581,840 2,317,933 736,093 31.8
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A
46 I~VESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
11:39:19 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6%lRem~ining
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Cat~6ry within Fund Sunm%ary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
41 OTHER TA~ES 5,649 40,606 67,200 26,594 39.6
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 100.0
46 IN'VESTMENT INCOME 13,018 95,439 45,000 -50,439 -112.1
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOT~FLOOD CONTROL CONST F~ 18,667 136,045 1,112,200 976,155 87.8
WATER AND SEWER FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 3,553 698,643 1,545,300 846,657 54.8
44 C~L~RGES FOR SERVICE 472,870 3,107,579 6,092,050 2,984,471 49.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 14,802 105,305 151,000 45,695 30.3
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 36,000 36,000 100.0
48 OTHER REVENUE 51 12,573 25,000 12,427 49.7
TOTAL WATER AND SEWER FUND 491,276 3,924,100 7,849,350 3,925,250 50.0
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 300 2,100 5,400 3,300 61.1
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 130,000 130,000 660,000 530,000 80.3
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 14,679 99,831 176,000 76,169 43.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,883 22,795 36,000 13,205 36.7
TOTAL PAP. KING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 147,862 254,726 877,400 622,674 71.0
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 95,106 665,760 1,141,301 475,541 41.7
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 769 5.,981 8,000 2,019 25.2
TOTAL VEHIOLE MAINTENANCE FUND 95,8?5 67i~741 1,149,301 477,560 41.6
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 66,154 463,074 793,840 330,766 41.7
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 24,714 181,869 280,000 98,131 35.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 82,525 60,000 37,478 62.5
TOTAL VEHiCLE REPLACEMENT FUND 90,868 667,468 1,133,840 466,372 41.1
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 9,962 69,576 117,599 48,023 40.8
48 IbV~ESTMENT INCOME 1,431 10,906 14,500 3,594 24.8
TOTAL COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 11,393 80,482 182,099 51,.~17 _ 39.1
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
.43 I~TERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 5,000 8,000 100.0
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 249,507 1,738~964 2,992,288 1,255;384 42.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 11,160 88 993 150,000 6~;007 40.7
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 10,053 60,000 49,947 83.2
48 OTHER REVENUE 56,575 336,806 578,352 241~546 41.8
5
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) C~pleted
11:39:19 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Su~nary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL RIEK MANAGEMENT FUND 317,242 2,172,816 3,785,640 1,612,824 42.6
POLICE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 120,494 504,876 1,760,000 1,255,124 71.3
48 OTHER REVENUE 38,400 605,370 1,169,601 564,231 48.2
TOTAL POLICE pENSION FUND 158,894 1,110,246 2,929,601 1,819,355 62.1
FIRE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 141,322 677,386 1,900,000 1,222,614 64.3
48 OTHER REVENUE 28,798 552,482 1,122,180 569,698 50.8
TOTAL FIRE PENSION FUND 170,120 1,229,868 3,022,180 1,792,312 59.3
BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME - i' 237 2,025 5,000 2,975 59.5
TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST %2 FDA~D 237 2,025 5,000 2,975 59.5
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 870 870 0 -870
TOTAL ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 870 870 0 -870
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL SSA %1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 370 19,656 38,125 18,469 48.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 108 942 1,500 558 37.2
TOTAL SSA 96 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 478 20,598 39,625 19,027 48.0
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
TOTAL MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 month, ( 88.3% I Completed
5 Months ( 41.6% ) Re~ining
Budget Expenditure SUmmary
01/01/01 2 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES 1,517,376 10,333,836 18,759,970 8,425,134 44.9
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 309,172 2,775,666 5,202,344 2,426,678 46.6
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 17,705 152,581 359,100 206,519 57.5
PENSION BENEFITS 303,995 2,006,314 3,661,958 1,655,644 48.2
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,129,559 6,844,374 14,004,954 7,160,580 51.1
UTILITIES 62,501 289,662 872,474 312,812 54.6
INSURANCE 310,431 2,339,633 3,780,667 1,441,034 38.1
COF~4ODITIES & SUPPLIES 123,918 646,683 1,354,916 708,233 52.3
OTHER EXPENDITURES 14,810 636,763 1,258,106 618,343 49.3
~ IMPROVEMENTS 14,564 18,964 240,425 224,461 93.4
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 19,854 86,172 1,668,000 1~581,828 94.8
OFFICE EQUIPMENT 17,064 181,313 434,935 283,622 65.2
MOBILE EQUIPMENT 25,365 593,714 1,500,245 906,531 60.4
OTHER EQUIPMENT 34,091 177,157 568,607 391,450 68.8
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 4,005 83,366 625,509 542,143 86.7
INFRASTRUCTURE - j- 739,071 2,071,560 11,792,532 9,720,972 82.4
BOND PRINCIPAL 215,000 439,688 3,201,880 2,762,222 86.3
INTEREST EXPENSE 141,178 797,386 1,251,762 454,376 36.3
BANK AND FISCAL FEES 300 3,900 10,830 6,930 64.0
INTEHFUND TRANSFERS 0 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
Total All Funds 4,999,959 30,736,687 70,887,184 ~0,150,497 86.6
EXPENDITURE BY FUND
GENERAL FUND 2,245,509 15,515,096 28,114,309 12,599,213 44.8
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 267,432 1,844,993 3,329,591 1,484,598 44.6
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 94,763 811,991 2,249,363 1.,437,372 63.9
LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 0 6,720 14,863 8,143 84.8
COMMUNITY DEVELP~/~T BLOCK G~/{T 28,105 61,665 499,376 43~, 711 87.7
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 0 47,000 47,000 0
REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B 0 61,271 588,543 528,272 89.6
G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 0 22,597 430,292 407,695 94.7
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPENT B&I 1996B 0 6,694 163,388 186,694 95.9
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 0 2,344 54,588 52,244 95.7
DOW/gTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 362,331 509,963 511,163 1,200 0.2
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 0 0 0 0
REFUNTDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993B 0 28,947 309,624 280,677 90.7
F~DOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 0 14,755 179,710 164,955 91.8
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 0 23,568 212,188 188,620 88.9
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 0 8,304 66,908 58,604 87.6
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 0 23,784 152,970 129,186 84.5
EPA F~OD LOAN B&I 0 326,320 603,884 277,834 46.0
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 300 56,~49 . _ 112,498 56,149 49.9
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 0 48,276 621,753 573,477 92.2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 0 3,319 186,688 153,369 97.9
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 0 51,300 102,900 51,600 50.1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FiReD 182,094 396,634 3~811,843 3,415,209 89.6
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 56.5~) Comp~et.d
5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
Budget Expenditure S~ary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST F%~D 0 0 0 0
SERIES 2001 pROJECT FUND 0 0 960,000 960,000 100.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 0 190,666 190,666 100.0
DOW/qTO%TN REDEVLP~T CONST 54.439 668,829 1,773,792 1,104,963 62.3
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 452~955 1,002,645 3,556,917 2,554,272 71.8
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 3 529 19,294 2,871,942 2,856,648 99.5
WATER ~ SEWER FUND 597,823 3,667,799 5,261,305 4,593,546 55.6
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 11,935 85,823 940,895 855,072 90.9
VENICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 90,498 584,933 1,155,389 570,456 49.4
VENICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 25,365 628,714 1,570,245 941,631 60.0
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 794 36,255 46,075 9,820 21.3
RISK 5t~/~AGEMENT FUND 285,538 2,171,077 3,535,903 ~,364,826 38.6
POLICE PENSION FUND 148,960 981,595 1,813,738 832,143 45.9
FIRE PENSION FL~qD 150,782 994,999 1,798,075 803,076 44.7
BENEFIT TRUST ~2 F~D 2,960 20,721 35,525 14,804 41.7
SSA ~1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I -6.153 6,153 42,305 36,152 85.5
Total All Funds 4,999,959 30,736,687 70,887,184 40,150,497 56.6
2
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
:~:38:35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budge~ E~penditure Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PRO~RAMTOTALS
02 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 6,089 67,417 91,870 24,453 26.6
03 ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS 971 7,570 15,136 7,566 50.0
Totals 7,080 74,987 107,006 32,019 29.9
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,726 18,378 32,359 13,984 43.2
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 371 2,531 4,458 1,907 43.0
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 50 400 350 87.5
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,915 48,305 57,334 9,029 18.7
55 UTILITIES 76 316 428 109 25.6
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -58 3,709 9,550 5,841 61.2
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 1,701 2,500 799 82.0
Totals 7,030 74,987 107,006 32,019 29.9
SOURCE OF FUNDS
00I GENERAL FUND 7,030 74,987 107,006 52,019 29.9
Totals 7,030 74,987 107,006 52,019 29.9
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months { 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Su=~nary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE MANAGER ' S OFFICE ExPended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE 34,459 222,544 372,431 149,887 40.2
02 LEGAL SERVICES 64,315 222,077 212,100 -9,977 -4.7
03 PERSONNEL SERVICES 16,573 93,624 288,903 195,279 67.6
04 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 12,205 71,164 172,832 101,668 58.8
05 PUBLIC INFORMATION 24,905 94,727 161,196 66,469 41.2
Totals 152,457 704,136 1,207,462 $08,826 41.7
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 38,418 243,647 520,110 276,463 68.2
$1 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,989 59,815 113,842 54,027 47.5
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 5,882 19,888 41,300 21,715 52.6
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 77,088 322,300 438,270 115,970 26.5
55 UTILITIES 419 2,362 5,220 2,858 84.8
57 CO~40DITIES & SUPPLIES 15,191 32,003 36,450 4,447 12.2
68 OFFICE EQUIPMENT - ~' 6,470 24,424 52,270 27,846 83.3
Totals 152,457 704,136 1,207,462 503,326 41.7
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GEHEP, AL FUND 152,457 704,186 1,207,462 503,326 41.7
Totals 152,457 704,136 1,207,462 $03,326 41.7
'08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~38:3s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months ( 41.6~ ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budg~!EXi~enditure Summary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
TV SERVICES DIVISION Expended Expended B~dget Balance Percent
PRO,RAM TOTALS
02 TELEVISION SERVICES 10,536 115,039 165,883 50,824 30.6
03 OTHER SERVICES 0 0 0 0
Totals 10,536 115,039 165,863 50,824 30.6
EXPFA~DITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,755 50,631 75,610 24,979 33.0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,000 14,613 23,742 9,129 38.5
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 72 1,579 3,650 2,071 56.7
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 983 9,886 17,961 8,075 45.0
55 UTILITIES 647 3,046 5,800 2,754 47.5
67 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 79 7,072 8,600 1,528 17.8
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 28,212 30,500 2,288 7.5
Totals 10,536 115,039 165,863 50,824 30.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 10,536 115,039 165,863 50,824 30.6
Totals 10,536 115,039 165,863 $0,824 30.6
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 88.3% ) Complete~
~:38:35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE CLERK ' S OFFICE ExPended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE 10,275 79,698 143,370 63,672 44.4
Totals 10,275 79,698 143,370 63,672 44.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,015 45,815 82,467 36,652 44.4
81 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,939 14,057 24,884 10,827 43.5
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 128 354 2,300 1,946 84.6
84 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 649 14,138 24,919 10,781 43.3
55 UTILITIES 276 1,168 1,600 432 27.0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,271 4,166 7,200 3,034 42.1
Totals 10~279 79,698 143,370 63,672 44.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND - &- 10,275 79,698 143,370 63,672 44.4
Totals 10,275 79,698 143,370 63,672 44.4
4
'08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% } Completed
.._~UNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
11:38:35
VILLAGE
OF
FRRDBR01
SUM03i Department BUd~t';;EXPe~diture Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROURAMTOTALS
01 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 16,763 119,875 219,235 99,360 45.3
02 ACCOUNTING 17,750 163,996 297,268 133,272 44.8
03 DATA PROCESSING 14,654 149,947 208,720 58,773 28.2
04 DUPLICATING SERVICES -50 6,432 11,700 5,268 45.0
05 INSURANCE PROGRAMS 19,498 138,095 237,398 99,303 41.8
06 CUSTOMER SERVICES 20,131 172,941 311,297 138,356 44.4
07 CASH MkNAGEMENT 2,791 20,786 35,752 14,966 41.9
Totals 91,537 772,072 1,521,370 549,298 41.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51,409 412,050 741,152 329,102 44.4
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,805 110,303 194,277 83,974 43.2
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 403 3,749 10,250 6,501 63.4
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,704 ~117,752 149,485 31,733 21.2
55 UTILITIES - i' 933 3,903 5,150 1,247 24.2
56 INSURANCE 15,186 106,302 182,231 75,929 41.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,052 10,830 30,550 19,720 64.5
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3,045 7,183 8,275 1,092 13.2
Totals 91,$37 772,072 1,321,370 549,298 41.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 91,537 772,072 1,321,370 549,298 41.6
Totals 91,537 772,072 1,321,370 549,298 41.6
08/10/2o01 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Month~ ( 41.6~) Re~a~ni~
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 COMS~3NITY DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 14,096 107,378 186,518 79,140 42.4
02 PLANNING & ZONING 46,419 195,870 246,917 51,047 20.7
03 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 5,790 36,743 72,244 35,501 49.1
05 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 44,339 355,560 653,510 297,950 45.6
06 ROUSING INSPECTIONS 20,994 143,361 261,101 117,740 45.1
07 B~ALTE INSPECTIONS 7,616 55,305 101,881 46,576 45.7
Totals 199,254 894,217 1,522,171 627,954 41.3
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 74,688 550,808 1,027,940 477,132 46.4
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 22,711 162,665 291,544 128,879 44.2
82 OTBEB EMPLOYEE COSTS 129 13,364 21,045 7,681 36.5
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37,584 141,354 136,987 -4,367 -3.2
55 UTILITIES 2,571 14,362 25,310 10,948 43.3
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES - &' 1,571 8,262 15,745 7,483 47.5
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 3,402 3,600 198 5.5
Totals 199,254 894,217 1,522,171 627,954 41.3
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FL~D 139,254 894,217 1,521,121 626,904 41.2
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 0 0 1,050 1,050 100.0
Totals 139,254 894,217 1,522,171 627,954 41.3
~0S/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3%
)
Completed
n:38:3~ VILLAGE v-~ MOUNT PROSPECT s Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMO3~ Department Bud~ Expenditure summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CDBG Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:3s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
suM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
HUMAN SERVICES Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 MUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTP~TION 9,692 73,161 168,643 95,482 56.6
02 SOCIAL SERVICES 31,784 180,627 326,845 146,218 44.7
03 NURSING/HEALTH SERVICES 7,234 47,406 95,361 47,955 50.3
04 SENIOR PROGRAMS 7,396 43,414 81,961 38,547 47.0
Totals 56,106 344,608 672,810 328,202 48.8
EXPENDITURE CI,kSSIFICATION
90 PERSONAL SERVICES 38,987 241,872 426,425 184,553 43.3
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,698 59,107 103,698 44,991 43.0
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 693 5,300 4,607 86.9
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,088 30,973 90,942 59,969 65.9
55 UTILITIES 1,220 9,120 7,880 2,160 29.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,163 8,714 33,965 28,251 83.2
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 1,129 2,000 871 43.6
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT - i' 0 0 3,200 3,200 100.0
Totals 56,106 344,608 672,810 328,202 48.8
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 56,106 344,608 672,810 328,202 48.8
Totals 56,106 344,608 672,810 828,202 48.8
7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:3~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01 ·
SUM031 Department BUd~~enditure Suamnary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
POLICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 POLICE ADMIMISTP~ATION 142,666 1,096,661 1,899,839 803,178 42.3
02 PATROL & TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 451,787 3,236,128 5,663,403 2,427,275 42.9
03 CRIME PREVTN & PUBLIC SERVICES 13,127 110,718 213,129 102,411 48.1
04 INVESTIGATIVE & JUVENILE PRGM 74,046 534,726 1,020,092 485,366 47.6
05 CROSSING GUARDS 0 12,260 23,978 11,718 48.9
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 47,600 357,183 626,364 269,181 43.0
Totals 729,226 5,347,676 9,446,805 4,099,129 43.4
EXPENDiTURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 548,718 8,625,241 6,252,065 2,626,824 42.0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 84,814 895,411 1,714,133 818,722 47.8
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 1,952 32,208 83,065 50,857 61.2
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 56,565 698,038 1,203,989 505,951 42.0
55 UTILITIES 4,549 27,676 57,124 29,448 51.6
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES - i' 2,628 43,703 83,891 39,888 47.7
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 19,866 31,313 11,447 36.6
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 5,533 21,525 15,992 74.3
Totals 729,226 8,347,676 9,446,808 4,099,129 43.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 729,226 9,340,956 9,431,942 4,090,986 43.4
060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 0 6,720 14,863 8,143 54.8
Totals 729,226 5,347,676 9,446,805 4,099,129 43.4
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:~8:3s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
FIRE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~1:30:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
su~031 Department Budget EXpenditure Sm~ary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROUP~%M TOTALS
01 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINSTRATION 73,709 542,770 959,712 416,942 43.4
Totals 75,709 542,770 959,712 416,942 43.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 12,706 101,255 193,808 92,553 47.8
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,948 57,243 100,381 43,138 43.0
52 OTBER EMPLOYEE COSTS 1,372 13,811 27,850 14,039 50.4
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50,038 349,246 605,538 256,292 42.3
55 UTILITIES 1,406 11,006 17,175 6,169 35.9
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 239 8,709 10,460 1,791 16.7
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 3,000 3,000 100.0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 1,500 1,500 0
Totals 73,709 542,770 959,712 416,942 43.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 73,709 542,770 959,712 416,942 43.4
Totals 73,709 542,770 959,712 416,942 43.4
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
n:~8:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM03i Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS STREETS/BLDGS EXpended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALE
01 STREET DIVISION ADMINISTRATION 7,046 75.451 124,265 48,814 39.3
02 MAINTENANCE - PUBLIC BUILDINGS 63,026 381,193 712,358 331,165 46.5
04 STREET MAINTENANCE 52.237 254,336 522,031 267,695 51.3
05 SNOW REMOVAL 8,072 166,836 316,468 149,632 47.3
06 LEAF REMOVAL 8 466 52,414 155,918 103,504 66.4
07 STORM SEWER & BASIN MAINT 10 524 69,693 146,435 76,742 52.4
08 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS i 536 36,058 59,812 23,754 39.7
09 TMAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 9,140 53,084 98,347 45,263 46.0
11 pARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 11,935 85,823 280,895 195,072 69.4
Totals 171.982 1,174,888 2,416,529 1,241,641 51.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 71.730 555,101 1,050,729 495,628 47.2
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 18,066 132,935 244,418 111,483 45.6
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - ~' 30,775 180,419 432,210 251,791 58.3
55 UTILITIES 6,497 8,591 21,605 13,014 60.2
56 INSURl%NCE 627 4.389 7,524 3,135 41.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES ~4,681 162,159 311,461 149,302 47.9
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 7 709 9,909 2,200 22.2
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 29,606 123 585 338,673 215,088 63.5
Totals 171,982 1,174,888 2,416,529 1,241,641 51.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 160 047 1,024,141 1,962,594 938,453 47.8
050 MOTOR FUEL TA~ FUND 0 64,924 173,040 108,116 62.5
630 pARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 11 935 85,823 280,895 195,072 69.4
Totals 171.982 1,174,888 2,416,529 1,241,641 51.4
~08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
· ~ii~ . 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Re~aining
~38,3~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRDBR01
SUMO31 Department Budget E~penditure Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/GRNDS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGP-%M TOTALS
01 FORESTRY DIVISION ADMIN 11,781 90,449 171,112 80,663 47.1
02 MAINTENANCE OF GROUND 37,666 174,833 327,921 153,088 46.7
03 FORESTRY PROGRAM 68,263 341,260 730,474 389,214 53.3
04 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION 3,635 18,755 48,198 29,443 61.1
Totals 121,345 625,297 1,277,705 652,408 51.1
EXPenDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 53,884 341,888 609,247 267,359 43.9
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12,507 84,974 149,540 64,566 43.2
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 350 1,341 1,290 -51 -4.0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50,217 181,772 471,238 289,466 61.4
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 4,387 15,322 34,500 19,178 55.6
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 11,890 11,890 100.0
Totals 121,345 625,297 1,277,705 652,408 51.1
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 121,345 621,246 1,262,705 641,459 50.8
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 0 4,051 15,000 10,949 73.0
Totals 121,345 625,297 1,277,705 652,408 51.1
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING EXpended EXpended Budget Balance Percent
~08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:3~ VILLAGE v-n~ MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months { 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 DePartment Budget: E~penditure Su~nary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEWER Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROG~AMTOTALS
01 WATER & SEWER DIVISION ADMIM 87,237 624,040 1,407,060 783,020 55.6
02 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 1,105 11,425 83,499 72,074 86.3
03 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 6,366 29,575 80,652 51,077 63.3
04 WATER SUPPLY MAINT & REPAIR 38,491 225,486 668,666 443,180 66.3
05 WATER DISTRBT MAINT & REPAIR 42,880 239,106 601,451 362,348 60.2
06 WATER VALVE/MYDRRT MAINT & REP 30,332 146,025 287,001 140,976 49.1
07 WATER METER MAINT & REPL 29,540 104,650 278,934 169,284 61.8
08 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 44,081 308,568 528,975 220,407 41.7
09 SANITARY SEWER MAINT & REPAIR 51,962 212,133 427,617 215,484 50.4
10 WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPROV 0 302,547 845,970 543,423 64.2
12 LAKE MICHIGAN WATER SUPPLY 265,859 1,464,204 3,056,480 1,592,276 82.1
Totals 597,823 3,667,759 8,261,305 4,593,546 55.6
EXPEnDiTURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES - &' 99,335 677,356 1,331,253 653,897 49.1
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 29,715 206,570 377,000 170,430 45.2
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 545 12,047 25,720 13,673 53.2
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 405,979 2,433,814 5,024,764 2,590,950 51.6
85 UTILITIES 13,391 70,727 137,170 66,433 48.4
56 INSURANCE 8,838 61,864 106,053 44,189 41.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 28,829 93,171 234,634 141,463 60.3
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 11,082 22,364 11,282 50.4
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 1,391 5,438 4,047 74.4
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 7,186 16,361 264,300 247,939 93.8
68 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 4,005 83,366 625,509 542,143 86.7
71 BOND PRINCIPAL 0 0 107,100 107,100 100.0
Totals 597,823 3,667,769 8,261,305 4,593,546 55.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
610 WATER AND SEWER FUND 597,823 3,667,759 8,261,305 4,593,546 55.6
Totals 597,823 3,667,759 8,261,305 4,593,546 55.6
15
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
n:~8:3s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 Months( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM081 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DISPOSAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 REFUSE DISPOSAL PROGRAM 267,432 1,844,993 3,329,591 1,484,598 44.6
Totals 267,432 1,844,993 3,329,891 1,484,598 44.6
EXPENDITURE CI~%SSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 5,118 38,849 69,280 30,431 43.9
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,489 10,819 19,001 8,182 43.1
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 248 1,500 1,252 83.5
84 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 257,746 1,788,687 8,230,204 1,441,517 44.6
55 UTILITIES 35 291 500 209 41.8
56 INSURANCE 242 1,695 2,906 1,211 41.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 2,805 4,404 6,200 1,796 29.0
Totals 267,432 1,844,993 8,329,591 1,484,598 44.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS - i'
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FLr~D 267,432 1,844,993 3,329,591 1,484,598 44.6
Totals 267,422 1,844,993 3,329,591 1,484,598 44.6
~08/10/2001 7 Months { 58.3% ) Completed
n:38:3~ VILLAGE OF '~(%?l]U'~"..vv.._ PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department BUdget ExPenditure Sum~nary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - VEHICLE MAINT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 VEHICLE DIVISION ADMINSTRATION 9,649 78,369 146,019 67,650 46.3
02 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 80,849 506,564 1,009;370 502,806 49.8
Totals 90,498 584,933 1,155,389 570,456 49.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 40,346 278,085 536,539 258,454 48.2
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,345 79,477 145,290 65,813 45.3
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 25 2,900 2,875 99.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,115 39,286 53,160 13,874 26.1
55 UTILITIES 130 1,068 965 -103 -10.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 32,562 186,814 392,788 205,971 52.4
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 1,000 1,000 100.0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 178 22,750 22,572 99.2
Totals 90,498 584,933 1,155,389 570,456 49.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
660 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 90,498 584,933 1,155,389 570,456 49.4
Totals 90,498 584,933 1,155,989 570,456 49.4
05/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Re~ining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Sualmary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 COMMUNITY GROUPS & MISC 3,817 57,559 95,400 37,841 39.7
03 4TM OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS,ETC 65,482 89,661 97,186 7,525 7.7
04 MOLIDAY DECORATIONS 469 6,310 67,239 60,929 90.6
05 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 166 1,458 2,871 1,413 49.2
Totals 69,934 154,988 262,696 107,708 41.0
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6~ ) Re~i~in~
FRRDBR01
SUM091 Department Budget Expenditure summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Une~pended Unexpended
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGP-~MTOTALS
01 VILLAGE IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIP 49,869 217,299 2,989,037 2,765,738 92.7
02 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 129,729 155,826 2,356,472 2,200,646 93.4
03 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST 54,499 668,829 1,772,742 1,103,913 62.3
04 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 3,529 15,294 3,011,942 2,996,645 99.5
06 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 520,323 1,714,231 5,499,970 3,785,739 68.8
09 MOTOR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 25,365 593,714 1,500,245 906,531 60.4
10 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 794 36,255 46,075 9,820 21.3
Totals 784,044 3,401,448 17,170,483 13,769,035 80.2
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:3o:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMo31 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
DEBT SERVICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
20
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
~:38:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Mo~ths ( 41.6~1 Re~i~in~
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
o~/o~/o~ o?/~/o~
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
RETIREE PENSIONS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 MISCELLANEOUS PENSIONS 4,253 29,775 56,695 26,920 47.5
02 POLICE PENSIONS 148,960 981,595 1,813,738 832,143 45.9
03 FINE PENSIONS 150,782 994,999 1,798,075 803,076 44.7
Totals 503,995 2,006,369 3,668,508 1,662,139 45.3
EXPENDITURE C~ASSIFICATION
53 PENSION BENEFITS 303,995 2,006,314 3,661,958 1,655,644 45.2
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 55 6,550 6,498 99.2
Totals 303,995 2,006,369 3,668,508 1,662,139 45.3
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 OENERAL FUND 1,293 9,054 21,170 12,116 57.2
710 POLICE PENSION FUND 148,960 981,595 1,813,738 832,143 45.9
720 FIRE PENSION FUND - ~- 150,782 994,999 1,798,075 803,076 44.7
730 BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 2,960 20,721 35,529 14,804 41.7
Totals 505,995 2,006,369 3,668,508 1,662,199 45.3
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Completed
n:38:3~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months (
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
RISK MANAGEMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGP-hMTOTALS
01 CASUALTY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 31,970 492,424 851,190 358,766 42.1
02 MEDICAL INSURANCE 253,568 1,674,602 2,669,713 995,111 37.3
Totals 285,538 2,167,026 3,920,903 1,393,877 38.5
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 1,643 38,950 37,307 95.8
56 INSLTRANCE 285,538 2,165,383 3,481,953 1,316,570 37.8
Totals 285,538 2,167,026 3,920,903 1,353,877 38.5
SOURCE OF FUNDS
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 285,538 2,167,026 3,520,903 1,353,877 38.5
Totals 285,538 2,167,026 3,820,903 1,353,877 38.5
22
08/10/2001 7 Months 58.5% ) Co~apleted
~:38:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months 41.6% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM05~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 07/31/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
NON-DEPARTMENTAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGP, AM TOTALS
01 CONTINGENCIES 0 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
Totals 0 520,985 641,970 520,985 50.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIEICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
53 PENSION BENEFITS 0 0 0 0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
80 INTBRFUND TRANSFERS 0 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
Totals 0 520,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 0 285,985 571,970 285,985 50.0
670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND - - 0 35,000 70,000 35,000 50.0
Totals 0 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
08/10/2001 7 Months ( 58.8% ) Complete~
5 Months ( 41.6% ) Remaining
~:~8:35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 07/31/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 LIBRARY SERVICES 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
90 COMPONENT UNIT EXPENDITURES 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,573,000 4,578,000 100.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
950 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
24
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
17-Aug-01
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 08/01/01 - Per Attached Credits/ Balance
08101/01 08117101 List of Bills Debits 08/t7101
General Fund 8,135,156 952,889 432,067 (101 ) 8,655,877
Special Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,418,658 46,709 115,335 1,350,032
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 2,043,204 139,760 24,933 2,158,031
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 9,401 9,401
Community Development BIk Grant Fund 7,650 4,406 3,244
Debt Service Funds 3,381,126 170,281 3,551,407
Capital Proiects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 3,457,316 13,574 3,443,742
Series 2001 Project Fund 101 101
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 192,412 192,412
Street Improvement Construction Fund 43,624 930 42,694
Flood Control Construction Fund 4,053,987 97~657 241,201 3,910,443
3,224,566 4,712 2,227 3,227,051
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 2,913,191 287,705 313,321 2,887,575
Parking System Revenue Fund 880,200 6,742 2,192 884,750
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 261,766 22,333 239,433
Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,518,416 299,527 5,218,889
Computer Replacement Fund 368,200 368,200
Risk Management Fund 2,661,215 29,530 238,942 2,451,803
Trust & A~lency Funds
Police Pension Fund 31,188,811 18,192 4,344 31,202,659
Fire Pension Fund 32,527,662 41,741 32,569,403
Flexcomp Trust Fund 10,330 8,385 13,351 5,364
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,463,048 18,985 22,068 1,459,965
Benefit Trust Funds 61,931 61,930
103,821,870 1,823,288 1,750,852 103,894,305
REPORT: APBOARDRST GENERATED: I NEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUGI601 16:10 PAGE I
RELL~SE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESFi~TED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUN AUGUST 01 2001 TO AUGUST 17 2001
NEF~ ~ROR NER VENDOR NA~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
001
05452 AAA ENPLO~ig~NT SECRETANIAL SERVICE 507.00
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TERIA.~ CO. BUILDING & ~{AMD~RE SUPPLIES 75.11
BUILDING & HANDWARE SUPPLIES 34.93
BUILDING & ]~h~UNANE SUPPLIES 2t.45
BUILDING & HA~DWANE SUPPLIES 29.69
BUILDING & ~ARO~ANE SUPPLIES 76.44
BUILDING & BAMUNARE SUPPLIES 10.80
248.42
01135 ADVANCED SYSTL~S GROUP, INC. NENVICE 1150.00
04161 ADV~ATE ~DICAL GROUP ~DICAL EXk~$ 496.00
04594 AMC FIRE SAFETY SECUNITY - ~' PIKE POLE 66.70
01227 AIR ONE EQ~IPHUNT, INC. REPAIR OF S~AD 572.53
01246 AIRGAS NORTH CENTP, AL REPAIR & PANTS 4.13
AM~ANCE SUPPLIES 4.13
AIRGAS SERVICE 202.27
210.53
01335 ALREIAN BROTNEES ~DtCAL CE, NTR CRE CARDS I74.00
01591 AMERICAN HOTEL ENGISTER CO. TANLE SKIRTING 766.8I
05222 Aig/%ICAN INDUSTRIAL UNtPORE RE~TAL 118.80
01840 k~DERSON PEST CONTROL RODENT CONTEOL 260.00
SERVICE 66.25
SERVICE 260.00
1422 PARK DR. 75.00
REMOVE HOENEST NEST 75.00
736.25
01994 ARAMANK REFRES~.~'T SENVICES COFFEE 92.80
02016 ANC DISPOSAL COMPANY CLEANUP SERVICES i63.50
02138 AP, MOR SVSTL~S CORPO~TION COLLECTION SERVICES 61.33
01124 A~THUN CLESEN, INC. MARKING F~AON/FUNTILIZER 188.14
02270 AT&T SERVICE ~ON-J~LY 2.55
SERVICE JUN-,F~LI 8.51
SERVICE J~N-J]LY t7.02
SUNVICE ~N-~Y 8.51
SERVICE JUN-~LY 32.34
SERVICE J~N-UNLY 8.5I
SERVICE J~N-~Y 12.76
SERVICE JUN-JULY 22.13
REPORT: APBOAREWIT GENERATED: 1 SEP O0 07:17 RUN: TBU~DAY AUGi601 16:10 PAGE 2
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF WIL~S PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~R~ AUGUST 01 2001 TO AUGUST 17 200t
DE~T VUNGOR N~R UENDOR NANK INVOICE DESCRIPTION k~OUNT
SERVICE JUN-JULY 6.81
SERVICE J]N~UNLY 6.8i
SERVICE JI]N- JULY 30.64
SERVICE UNN-UNLY 172.75
SERVICE ~UN-UNLY t69.35
SERVICE ~UN-JULY I08.93
607.62
06228 ATLAS PREFEESED SERVICES, INC. GRAFFITI Rlg~OVAL 500.00
05044 AVIS RENT a CAN SYST~ ~ AL%SE 659.69
02398 B & E INDUSTRIES INK CANTRI~ES 9t.78
06252 HANIANZ, RICH REBATE 140.00
05437 BEST ACCESS EYSTL~S _ ~. ENTRY ~YS 45.59
06237 BLETEUN, BILL REA~ ESTATE TRANSFER TLS 1040.00
02938 BOW~[~ UISTRIB~IO~ CEWIEA NUTS BOLTS & EARDWARE t24.55
01006 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. CAR WASH 36.75
05268 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 1467.50
01017 CALEA CANCELLATION FEE 50.00
01018 CALIGOR SUPPLIES 61.89
01518 CANON BUSINESS SOL~IOWI-CENT[tAL COPPER TONER 255.68
01049 CDW GOVEk~NKNT, IHC PAGEMAKER 80.49
UPGRADE 184.49
COMPNTEES SUPPLIES 22I. 60
REPLACL~ENT PC KEYBOARD I3.84
WIRELESS MODL~ 279.99
780.41
01055 CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 57.36
05375 CENTURY CLEANKES UNIFO~ CLEANING 87.63
04678 CHICAGO E~ING SOCIETY INTERPRETER 285.00
01097 CINTAS CORP UWIPO~ ENPENSE 60.00
CLEANING SERVICE 367.85
427.85
05857 CITI CANDS A.O.L SERVICE 23.90
01103 CITIZENS WATER RESOURCES 6/19-7/19/01 108.94
03000 CLARK, SA~D~A M. REIS 32.00
REPORT: APBOANDRPT GENERATED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUGi601 16:10 PAGE 3
RS&~B ID :
VILI~AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE MUAND OF TNUSTBES FRUN AUGUST 0I 2001 TO AUGOST 17 2001
DEE'I VENDOR NBR VENDOR NANE INTOICE DRSCRI~TION ANOU)~
...................................................................................................................................
ADVANCE 130.50
ADVANCE 423.00
505.50
01118 CLF~tK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL ~OR - 080901 700.00
PAYROLL FOR - 080901 t90.00
090.00
01150 C(I~tUNICATIUNS DIRECT, INC. SERVICE 343.75
PARTS & IABOR 178.75
~PAIRED RADIO/INSTALLED RADIO 418.25
RADIOS I495.00
2435.75
01151 C(t'{4UNITY CONSOLIDATED - ;- CliC 308.60
01164 CUNCENTRA REDICAL CENTERS IUg~DO~ DOT TESTING 440.00
01167 CONDUN, KEVIN J. ~EIMUUREEF~NT 59.56
05061 DATAEASE TECENOIDGIRS JlILY BILLING-AUTO T~AC~P 60.00
~LY BILLING-AUTO T~CKXP 115.00
175.00
06254 DELPRINCIEN, BARBARA REAL ESTATE ENBATE 162.00
05982 DELUXE BUSINESS MUP~IS WATER & GENE~RA~ DEP.TICKET 38.95
01262 D~!4OLEN MUSIC LIBRARY MUSIC LICENSE AGRE)5~N~ 890.00
06255 OUEEN, DONALD T. T~ ~BATE 632.00
04707 DI~CT ENSPONSE POSTAGE-VEN WAILING 2119.90
01278 DISP~Y SUPPLY CUNPANY HOOK & LOOP 272.50
01279 DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS STAPLES FOR tNTESTIGATI~ 120.00
01287 DOOR SYSTENS, INC. SERVICE 14.22
SERVICE TO EXTERIOR DOOR 175.90
t90.12
00319 DODBRE, RtCEAILD REIMUORSUNENT 32.72
01340 ~)ARSY COF~ SERVICE COFIt~E & SUPPLIES 62.20
01350 ENDEAVOR PLUS SERVICE 28.00
01366 EXPERIAN EACKGROQND CBECRS 25.00
06198 F & F OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SOPPLtES 13.87
MUCRO-CASS~TTE ~ECOROURS 881.70
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: i SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUG1601 t6:10 PAGE 4
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM AUGUST 01 2001 TO AUGUST t7 2001
DEPT VF2IDOR NER VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
OFFICE SUPPLIES 335.96
1231.53
01369 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE SERVICE BROCHURES 160.00
SERVICE REQUEST FORMS 180.00
DOOR HANGERS 98.00
PRINTING 230.00
668.00
06251 RANTASRAS DIVE, II~C. REGISTRATION 350.00
01374 FAMLEY AMD ASSOC. SIGN FOR CASCADE SYSTEMS 13.00
01377 FEDERAL REPRESS CORS CHARGES 19.92
CHARGES I4.56
- ~. MISCELLANEOUS SHIPPING CHARGES 7.54
OVEEMIGNT SHIEMENT 77.53
119.55
00329 FELL, JUDITH B. REPAIR OF SHARP COEY MACHINE 380.3i
00331 FIGOLAH, MICHAEL EXPENSES 930.55
01392 FIRE DEPT. SAFETY OFCRS. ASSN. ~ERSHIP 75.00
01394 FIRE ENGINEERING SUBSCRIPTION t9.95
00102 FIRE PENSION FUND PAYROLL FOR - 080901 13174.76
01401 FINE RESCUE SUBSCRIPTION 25.95
01422 FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC REMOVE INSTALL BANNERS 715.00
06256 FRAMGER, JOSEPH ~ ESTATE TAM REBATE 548.00
01461 GALL'S, INC. HANDWAHN 88.79
05220 GARDEN BOUQUET G~ NELL ARRAMGEMENT 46.00
01474 GEMHLER'S IRC COOLING/SAFETY VEST 167.75
06236 GESTRICH, HANS OVENEA~ 24.00
01551 HA~L SIGNS, INC. NORNING SIGHS 84.03
01578 HREDRICKSRE, ROBERT W. PARKNAY T~E RE~OVALS 400.00
01619 HOUSTON A$SOOIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 350.00
00106 IOMA RETIP, B24E~i'T TRUST - 401 PAYROLL FOR - 080901 100.00
IOMA 401 pLAN 318.75
4!8.75
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THONSDAY AUGI601 16:10 PAGE 5
RELEASE ID :
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FRC~ AUGOST 01 2001 TO AUGUST 17 2001
DEPT VENDOR mR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
00107 ICI{A RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 PAYROLL FOR - 000901 15219.00
01635 IERA REVI~ CDORSE I70.00
01689 IGDA CON~RENCE 225.00
CONFE~NCE 225.00
00108 ILLINOIS OEP~I'~T OP ~v'ONON PAYROLL FOR - 073101 182.53
PAYROLL DR - 080901 1T335.25
17517.78
01698 ILLINOIS MONICIP~L LRAGOE A~W~ICE-¢,~I,~Y 145.00
01122 ILLINOIS STATE DISENREENENT UNIT PAYROLL ~OR - 080901 357.69
- ;' PAYROLL DOR - 080901 195.50
PAYROLL DR - 080901 126.00
EAYKOLL DR - 080901 60.00
PAYROLL FOR - 080901 520.75
1259.94
01715 ILLINOIS TACTICAL OFFCRS ASSDO REXORRES COURSE 80.00
REGISTRATION 175.00
255.00
01721 INDUSTRIAL LADDER & SUPPLY CO t~RDWARE SUPPLIES 98.54
06260 tNR SEXINAR 75.00
01703 JOURNAL & TOPICS NENS?A~ERE AD 185.74
AD 50.00
230.74
01794 KALE UNIFO~S, INC. EMBLEN~ 383.75
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 207.85
591.60
01796 KLM CONSTRUCTION SINGLE FAMILY RREA~ ' 15480.00
06152 KARL, CHRIS REtMB CDL 50.00
06100 KKANE, JO~ SUPPLIES 11.6I
SUPPLIES 54.47
ICE FOR ~RGENCY SERVICES 61.79
127.87
04219 KIWANIS CLUB OF MT. PROSPECT MONBERSHIP 225.00
01827 KLEIN, THORPE AXD J~NKINS,LTD. LEGAL SERVICE 15524.4t
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUG1601 16:I0 PAGE 6
ENLRREN ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE ~OARD OF TRUSTEES FROM AUGUST 01 2001 TO ANDOST 17 2001
DE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR NkME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ANOOMT
06185 KIYi~{O, NETNANT SUPPLIES 27.62
06242 KOSCAK, JOHN REBATE 105.00
06231 ENOLL, BILL REIM~ CERTIF 5.00
04490 KENN, ENITN REGISTER RE 92.00
06243 K~RGAN, EVELYN REFUND 70.00
06258 LEE, DEAN REBATE 590.00
05744 LICANI, NICE REI~URSLXENT 150.00
06248 LOAIk~L~STEN TACTICAL G1AN BAGS 215.00
01918 LENDSTROM'S NORRERY LANDSCAPE 1457.29
- ~. TURF MOWING 3979.68
5436.97
01946 MANAGENENT CONCEPTS INSPECTION SERVICES 5063.10
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 3764.80
8827.90
06249 MAREUS, ~LtE REIM~URSENENT 51.37
06259 MANSICO, SA~VATORE REBATE I75.00
06250 MASTERPIECE AUDIO PRODUCTIONS AUDIO TAPE MECNARICS 41.52
05709 MEADE ELECTRIC CO. INC. TWAFFIC SIGNAl MAt~TBNENCE 1077.85
05021 MENANDS PET CARRIER 49.88
SURGE STRIPS 25.04
75.72
00116 METRO FEDERAl CREDIT U~ION PAYROLL FOR - 080901 855.00
00117 M~TROPOLITAN ALLIANCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 080901 570.00
06067 MGB & ASSOCIATES CUSTOMER SERVICE 2~0.00
04322 MIROLETON, JOAN REIMB 75.00
02042 MIN~TFI~AN PRRSS ME~O HEAD 84.65
02045 MM DISTRIBUTORS WATER BOTTLES 718.02
02046 MOBILE PRINT INC. LIQUOR LICENSE FOENS t67.46
M~2~O PADS/BUS.~RDS 70.34
237.80
04016 MONROE SIGN DESIGN SHIRTS 275.00
~EPORT: ~BO~P~RPT GENEP~TED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 R~: TI~RSDAY AUG160I 16:10 PAGE 7
RELEASE ID :
VIL~GE OF MOU~ PR~P~
LIST OF BIL~ P~S~ED TO THE BO~ OF TRQSTEES ~ AUGUST O1 2001 TO AU~ST 17 200I
DE~ ~R NBR
...................................................................................................................................
92.00
)67.00
02066 MO~ PROSP~ C~ OF C~RCE C~ER DU~ 50.00
02067 MO~ PROSPECT HISTORICAL S~. SE~.~S 3333.33
02085 ~ICIPAL ~ ~S~IATI~ ~ D~S 30.00
06234 NATIO~ ~G F~NDATI~ OUR ~G BR~ 12.95
02129 NATIONA~ H~T ~D ~R CORP. SER~CE TO R~F 462.00
00123 NATtO~tDE PAYRO~ ~R - 080901 16372.34
02148 NEO~ST ~TE C~GE
02155 N~EL C~I~TI~S AC~)0005337520-0 706.01
AC~0005487469-8 302.8~
lC~)0005487469-B 2I).5t
ACCT'0005487469-8 378.27
AC~(00054~7469-~ 68.71
AC~3~006268167-3 355.66
AC~0005327297-7 17~.~9
AC~0009266503-3 158.06
~CCT)00093166~67-8 ~59.16
AC~)0009418000-7 232.
ACCT,0009334000-8 76.32
313L95
02170 NORTH ~T ~TI ~I~f T~G ~GISTER-$.SC~ITZ 175.00
02182 N~T~ ILLINOIS POLICE ~ SYST~ ~A~ LINE 8L50
02189 ~ORT~ST C~ DISP~TC~ ~YS S~RVXCE ~DE~D 3471L86
SERVICE ~DE~D 8618.72
43393.5B
02193 ~O~ST ~E~ S~PPLY ELEC SUPP 663.95
EL~ S~PP i28.88
ELEC SUS~ 18.22
ELEC SUPP 369.13
I180.18
02196 N~T~I ~NICIP~ CON--CE ~DIA ~IDE 55.00
02199 NOR~ST SIATIO~ INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 3931
BAC~ TAPE C~T~ES 89.9~
129.65
REPORT: ARBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: TBUKSDAY AUG1601 16:10 PAGE 8
RELRASE tD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS BRREENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRON AUGBPT 01 2001 TO AUGUST 17 2001
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION
02204 NOVAK t P~R IK. ~PAIR & SEUICE ~OR 83.49
02210 NUMBERS AUTOMATION tHC SERVICE 425.00
02211 NURSING 2001 RENEWAL 27.95
02239 ONE HOUR MOrO PBOTO PHOTO~S 119.70
05517 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRIPTION 34.40
02256 PADDDOK PUBLICATIONS, INC. CREEK CLEANING 25.02
06240 ?APPAS, JAMES TAX REBATE 772.00
00407 PATTI, MICHAEL REIMBURSE EXPENSES 12.00
05026 REYFONWANCR CORP. TONER CARTRIDGE 184.00
02281 PC MAGAZINE RENENAL 29.97
02285 PEDERSEH & ROOPT SERVICE 606.95
02301 PETTY CASH - FINAl{CE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 6.21
MISC REBERSES 8.82
MISC EXPENSES 24.00
MIRE EXPENSES 17.85
MISC EXPENSES 8.95
MISC EXPENSES 23.22
MISC EXPENSES 8.I0
MISC EXPENSES 252.01
MISC EXPEi4RES 2.25
MISC EXPENSES 8.65
MISC EXPENSES 24.00
MISC EXPENSES 6.30
MISC EXPENSES 25.01
MIEC EXPENSES 126.53
MIEC EXPENSES 16.83
MISC EJ(PRESRE I2.51
MISC EXPENSES 7.t0
MISC EXPENSES 8.91
RISC EXPENSES 7.36
594.6i
02303 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. MEPTINRE,TREG,SUPP 2.37
MRETINGS,TENG, SUPP 20.00
MEETINGS,TkNU, SUPT 2i .70
~ETINGS,TREG,SUPP 17.32
~ETINGS,TRNG,SUPP 27.00
MEETINGS,TREG,SUPP 60.50
t48.89
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC NURES TRAVEL/SUPPLIRS 196.10
06238 PIEROG, MARY TAX REBATE 482.00
REPORT: AREOABDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUG1601 16:t0 PAGE 9
.~ : REL5%~E ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT P~OSDECT
F~ AUGUST 01 2001 TO AUGUST I7 2001
DE~T VENDOR RER V~NDOR Nk~ INVOICE DEDORIF~ION
00124 POLICE PENSION FUND PAYROLL FOR - 073101 669.29
PAYROLL FOR - 080901 17522.64
18191.93
04921 POPE, ELIZA~NTH A. PAYROLL FOR - 080901 923.08
02344 PREISME ANIMA~ HO~PtTA~ STRAYS ~NE-J~LY 1050.00
02379 ~ILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 63.33
OFFICE SUPPLIES 63.33
OFFICE SUPPLIES 81.72
208.38
02380 QUIRLAN RURLtREIHG C~PANX 8ORS~IP?ION 76.76
02396 RAXMABK OFFICE PROD; FORE - s' AUCT #321000 FIRE 134.07
03918 PEAL RSTA?D INDEX INC. MONTNLY INVOICE 85.00
00399 REBEL'S TROPHIES, INC. PLAQUES FOR P.A.C.T 85.50
02411 RELIABLE EIGH PB~. PROD. INC. RAI~R 818.20
04902 RELIABLE OFFICE SHPPLIES SUPPLIES 89.21
02418 RESCUE NTST~ INC. THBULAB ~BBING 195.00
TUBELAB ~BNING 98.80
293.00
02465 ROTABY LUNCH CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT DOES 73.00
DUES 99.00
}~EMREESHIP 172.00
DUES 205.00
549.00
02468 RO~E I2 RENTAL CO., INC. RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 90.00
06069 ROYAL CHEMICAL HOSE CLEANER 210.44
HOSE CLRAMER 237.00
447.44
06263 SARETY VISION, INC. CAMERA SYSTEM 467.23
04873 SAN BHEMARDINO COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEK~S PAYROLL FOR - 080901 200.t3
02495 RAYEES CC~P~ER SOURCE EP TONER 59.23
LASEM~'RITER 75.00
I34.23
00125 SEIU L~AL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 080901 574.70
REPORT: AREOARDRFT GENERATED: 1 SES 00 07:t7 RON: THURSDAY AUG1601 16:10 PAGE t0
REL~E ID :
VIL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF EILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES REUN AUGUST 01 2001 TO AUGUST 17 2001
REPT VEWDOR NRA VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
06261 SELF HRAitNG RENEWAL 18.00
06241 SMITH, SANUEL SCOTT T~ REBATE 460.00
02658 SUBURBAN PRESS ELECTRICAL WORK PERMIT 105.00
02670 SWIRERSKI ELECTRONICS INC. TRIPOD HANDLES 85.00
REPAIR 133.00
218.00
02672 SYSTENS FORMS, INC. SUPPLIES 432.54
SUPPLIES 281.60
714.t4
04532 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER TAYLOR RENTAL 3051.78
02680 TELETRAC, INC. SERVICE 1213.95
02691 TE~PSUN ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS RSEELCRAIR LIFT 60.00
ELEV REINSRECTION 93.00
153.00
05522 THOMSON PUBLICATIONS AORICOLTORAL CHENICAL BOOK 30.45
02704 TOPCOR MIDWEST OAK STAKES 180.00
02723 TRITON ELECTRONICS, INC. RADAR REPAIRS 219.48
RECERTIFIED RADAR 78.88
298.36
02750 UNITED COFFEE SERVICE, INC. COFFEE SUPPLIES 57.95
00127 UNITED WAY PAYROLL FOR - 080901 306.35
05149 UNITROL/STINGER SPIRE SYSTRSS REPAIR 130.80
REPAIRS TO UNITROL UNIT 130.80
261.60
06264 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LIFE SKILLS TENG t5.00
02760 UNIVERSITY OM ILLINOIS REGISTRATION 55.00
05004 VERIZON WIRELESS PAGER RENTAL 66.87
02796 VEF CC~9(UNICATIUNS INC. RADIOS 824.00
PARTS/LABOR 72.00
886.00
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 080901 16797.34
PAYROLL FOR - 080901 29.96
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 SHU 00 07:17 BEN: THURSDAY AUG1601 I6:10 PAGE tl
~LRASE ID :
VIL~GE OF MO{~N~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS P~ESENTHU TO TEN BO~ OF TRUSTEES · ~ AUGUST 0I 2001 TO AUGUST 17 2001
DEPT V~R ~R ~N~R ~E I~OICE DRECRI~ION
16827.30
04314 Vt~GE OF MOU~ PDSPE~ - PAYROLL WI~S ~AYRO~ ~OR - 073101 1643.84
PAYROLL ~R - 080901 145595.31
~AYROLL DR - 080901 16624.18
PAYROLL ~R - 080901 13503.36
177366.69
02816 UISI~ ~ING PASSPORTS 149.50
01228 W.S D~HU & CO. SUPPLIES 98.70
B~S/~LtTES 1033.14
1131.84
02832 ~T C~NITY BRC ACT~603220201009478801 24.38
- ~. A~603220201009478801 71.21
95.59
02835 ~HUHUE DI~CT OFFICE SOPPLI~ 356.50
StGNAT~ ST~PS 60.51
OF~CE SUPPLIES 75.2I
OFFICE SUPPLIES 412.44
904.66
06124 ~ISBERG, ROBERT SUPPLI~ 33.90
SUPPLIES 15.85
49.75
05746 WISCTF PAYROLL ~R - 080901 396.I2
02893 ~LF C~, INC. FI~ ?R~HUSING 10.21
Ft~ PR~EHUtNG t31.07
FI~ PR~HUSING 127.44
268.72
06239 WOL~, STE~N T~ ~BATE 580.00
02896 WO~D ~N~W CL~ING CO WIN~ C~ING 442.00
05410 WO~ WI~LRS$, INC. ACCT%52-00036154 30.02
ACCT%22-00015599 24.57
54.59
T~ : 432066.65
03O
01639 ~KIC~ NATION~ B~K TIPPING ~RS 73619.64
FInD COSTS 41712.26
115331.90
REEORT: AEBOARDRPT GEREPATED: 1 RE~ 00 07:17 RDN: THU~DAY AUGt601 t6:10 PAGE 12
~L~SE ID :
VILLAGE OF I(OU~T PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~RC~ AUGUST 01 200I TO AUGUST I7 2001
RE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAI4E INVOICE DEXCRI~TION AMO~T
02270 AT&T SERVICE JUN-JULY 3.40
TOTAL 115335.30
050
02167 AEROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION STREET FESUREACING PROJECT 24868.43
04355 COOK COUNTY TFEASUFER MAI~T 4/1-6/30/01 65.00
TOTAL 24933.43
070
01021 CA~(P)'IRE BOYS ADD GIRLS CDBG SUB RECIPIRET 3000.00
06229 CNOI, MYOI~IG BIK REFUND BUS TRANSPORT 20.00
01208 CRO~E CHIZEK - =. AUDIT-FINAL BILL 400.00
06230 JOON, JANG REGISTER REFUND 60.00
04227 LEARNING FOR LIFE APR-JD~E BILLING 750.00
02256 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. AD-CDBG 85.94
03918 REAL ESTATE INDEX INC. REHAB PROJECT 80.00
06233 SUH, JIJNG REK~JND BUS TEAl{RS 10.00
TOTAL 4405.94
510
06247 BILTMORE REFRIGEXATION R~P~ACL~ENT ICE MREER 2635.00
01049 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC UPGMAGE 1239.99
UPGREDE COMPUTERS 28.15
1268.14
01147 CC('~tO~TH EDISON 10 S. PINE ST. 25.86
01596 HINES L~ER, EDWARD SOFFITT MATERIAL 77.58
05709 i~EADE ELECTRIC CO. INC. STREET LIGHT P~OJECT 4976.77
02193 HOKTNWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ONTSIDE LIG~ FIXTUFES 633.60
STREET LIG~ PONES 1561.38
2194.98
06187 WOLFF CLIENTS & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2395.74
TOTAL 13574.07
525
01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP CHA~GES 101.40
~PORT: APBOARDNPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUG160I 16:t0 PAGE 13
~ ~LEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOONT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO ~B BOARD OF TRUSTEES B~ AUGUST 01 200I TO AUGUST 17 200I
DER VENDOR NBR V~NDOR NA~B IF~OICE DESCRIPTION ~T
..................................................................................................................................
T~AL : 101.40
55O
01083 CHI~ TITLE INSU~CE CO. WO~ C~GE 5DO.00
01208 CR~ CHIZEK AUDIT-FIN~ BILL 430.00
T~5 : 930.00
56O
02167 ~ RO~ C~STRU~ION ST~ET ~C~STRU~ION P~G~ 238701.42
01858 ~<~K ~D S~Y SURLY OF ~ 2500.00
X~ : 241201.42
59O
06257 J~NSON, ~LS - ~. T~E ~OV~ 2150.00 '
02256 RAD~K PUBLICATIONS, INC. ST~B~ STABILI~TION 77.24
T~A5 : 2227.24
610
01071 ADDIS~ BUILDING ~TERI~ CO. BUILDING & ~RD~ SUPPLIES 85.22
BUILDING & ~W~ SUPPLIES 22.60
BUILDING & ~D~ SUPPLIEB 3.89
BUILDING & ~WA~ SUPPLIES 240.07
351.78
05222 ~RtC~ INDUSTRI~ ~t~ CLUING I18.8I
01620 ~RI~ ~DSCAPING INC. P~AY ~STO~TION 1095.60 "
01780 ~RITECH I~847~27034607 47.50
01973 ANA ~GIST~TI~ 575.00
02270 AT&T SEUICE ~-~LY 227.20
02328 A~TIC C~ROL SERVICES SERVICE 169.60
02938 B~ DISTRIBUTION C~ER R~S BOLTS & HADWA~ 295.61
01049 CDW ~NT, INC UPG~DE-MO~ING KIT 193.2I
05375 C~UKY CL~ UNIFO~ C~ING 86.62
01208 CR~ CHIZEK AUDIT-FI~ BILL 845.00
08982 DEL~ BUSI~SS RO~S ~T~ & G~ DEP.TtC~ 28.22
00318 ~EY, S~ CONVINCE [254.00
05047 ELGIN S~EPING S~VICES, INC. CLUING 2054.08
REPORT: AREOABDRPT GENERATED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUG1601 16:10 PAGE
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOCNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FE~ AUGUST 01 2001 TO AUGUST 17 200t
REPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIOTION AMOONT
01377 ~'EDEEAL ~PRESS CORS COURIER CEARGES 135.50
01559 EANSEN INFOP~JATDON TECUNOLDOY REGISTRATION FEE 395.00
01544 REK WATER METER SERVICE LABOR & MATERIALS 2125.00
LABOR & MATERIALS 2228.10
4353.10
01858 LAKE-COCK LAND SURVEY SURVEY OF LOT I233.00
01918 LUNDOTROM'S NURSERY TURF MOWING 247.12
02042 MINOT~)~AN PRESS MEDIATION PROGRAM BROCHURES 177.87
02155 WEXTEL C(I,9~UNICATIUNS ACCT#0005487469-8 368.65
02193 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY - ~. ELEC SURE 69.16
ELEC SURE 62.tl
131.27
02411 RELIABLE HIGH PERF. PROD. INC. EAINWEAJ~ 518.25
06235 SEIDEL, DAVID REFUND 62.76
04838 THIRD MILLEWEIUN ABDOC.INC. OTILITY BILLING 1662.31
02773 U.S. BANK TRUST WATER 178235.00
POWER 10919.00
O & M 10362.00
FIXED 95123.00
294639.00
06246 VAN DYKE CONSTRUCTIUN REFUND 271.00
02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT OFFICE SUPPLIES 356.50
02914 ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS BOX LIDS 680.00
PARTS/REPAIRS 748.00
1428.00
TOTAL : 313321.48
630
02754 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LA~D LEASE 2192.05
TOTAL : 2192.05
660
01169 AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. REPAIR/PARTS 42.7I
06097 AIRTEC RSPAIK-PABTS 544.1L
01937 ANTIOCH TIRE, INC. REPAIR TIRE 52.65
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GERERATED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY kUGi601 16:10 PAGE 15
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OB RILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM AUGUST 01 2001 TO RDG~ST 17 2001
DEFT VENDOR N~R VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
REPAIR TIRE 37.75
90.40
02270 AT&T SERVICE JUN-JULY i2.76
02938 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER NUTS BOLTS & ~ARDWARE 1105.61
01006 BUSSE CAR WASE, INC. CAR WASHES JULY,01 t018.50
05268 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 553.00
01236 DAVE & JIm'S AUTO BODY, INC. REPLACE A/C COMPRESSOR 132.50
REPLACE A/C COMPRESSOR 406.76
539.26
01289 DOUGLAS TRUCE PARTS - =- PARTS 436.95"
PARTS 219.52
PARTS 44.09
699.56
01436 :%RRDRIKSEN & SONS EXTINGUISHERS RECHARGED 24.00
03958 FREUND INTErnATiONAL 5~ERGENCY BRAKE CABLE 43.25
01444 FRIES AUTO,UT .r~ TOW 65.00
01511 GO, DYeR SENVtCE STORES TIRES 29.04
TIRES ' ~ 859.80
TIRES 109.64
698.48
01697 ILLINOIS ~ATERIAL NARDLING PARTS 108.32
01750 INTERSTATE BATTERY BATTERY 71.95
01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. PARTS & SERVICE FOR JULY 1395.88
PARTS & SERVICE FOR JULY 198.00
1593.88
01914 LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. TARGET TECE MAR LAMP ' i 411.89 .
02014 MiD-AMERICA TR. & EQUIP.CO.INC REPAIRS 243.60
REPAIRS ~ I026.00
1269.60
02058 MORTON GRO~ AUTOMOTIVE REBUILDING OF STARTERS 125.00
REBUILDING OF STARTERS ' 195.00
320.00
02155 RE, TEL CO~9~]NICATIOWS ACCT,0005487469-8 _- 148.55 ..
REPORT: APROARDR~T GENERATED: 1 HEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUG1601 16:10 PAGE 16
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRO~AUGUST O1 2001 TO AUGUST 17 2001
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME I~VOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02374 PANTS PLUS OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS REPAIR FARTS 40.57
02355 PRO FINISH CLEAMINGSUFPLIES 360.00
CLEAMINGSUPPLIES 33.06
393.06
02484 SAFETY K~EEN CORPORATION PARTS WASHER SERVICE I460.80
02491 HAUBER MFG. CO. SERVICE 194.00
04101 SPI DIPTRIBNTION INC. ~EPAIR PARTS 496.95
02601 SPRING A~IGN PARTS 642.50
04472 TEXOR PETROLE~ CO GASAHOL 9106.06
02769 UPTO~ A~TO SUPPLY BRAKE ~PAIR PARTS 593.36
05004 VERIZON WITLESS PAG!NGSE~ViCE 45.0i
TOTAL : 22333.20
670
04579 CUSTO~ VEHICLE SYSTt~S, INC. POLICE EQUIPMENT 3924.10
FIBERGLASS SEAT 325.00
4249.10
02014 MID-AMERICA TR. & EQUIF.CO.IHC DEPOS!T-RESCUE/P~PER 288000.00
02491 SAUBER M~G. CO. 5IPTGATE 7028.00
04951 SUBUBAM ACCENTS INC. GRAPHICS & LETTERING 250.00"
TOTAL : 299527.10
690
01102 CITIB~K, N.A. INS C~IMS-GAB 3861.00
01306 DRUG CAD, INC. CARD CLAIMS 14368.08
01737 INTERGOVEk~ENTAL PER.HEN.COOP INSURANCE 7586.52 -
INSURANCE 65072.45
INSU~CE 144676.58
INSU~CE i813.60
219149.15
02192 NORTHWEST CO~3NPTY HOSPIT.~ W/C CLAI~ 468.00
02208 NSO RENEWAL 89.00
06244 REYES, ODILIA LIARILITY CLAIM 588.64
06101 STATE T~{RASU~R RATE auJ & 2ND IN~RY 25.4Z ~'
REPORT: APBOAMOMPT GENERATED: 1 EXP 00 0~:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUGI601 16:10 PAGE 17
RELL~SE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ·
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES EXOM AUGUST 01 2001 TO AUGUST 17 2001
DEFT VENDOR HUR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
06S62 STOYAMOV, NASKO ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE 393.11
TOTAL 238942.40
710
02565 SKLODOWSKI,FUCRALSKI & REIMER LEGAL REES 1087.50
LEGAL FEES 3256.20
4343.70
TOTAL 4343.70
770
01867 AMDLER, GLEN R. FLEX COMP 1418.30
02667 BEHU~N, DAVID FLEX COMP 425.81
02921 BLUE, MICHAEL FLEX COMP 416.68
05987 HUEXIg~PER, LISA FLEX COMP 40.07
01035 CAP~EY, ~UREEN FLEX COMP 360.21
01219 DAHLBERG, JOHN K. FLEX COMP 770.66
04841 EVANS, RALPH FLEX COMP 100.00
01380 FELL, JUDITH B. FLEX COMP I50.00
01400 FIRST CCJ~ONV,'EXLTH F2{PLOYRE DENTAL PLAN ' 2254.71
01418 FLOBY, JAMES M. FLEX COMP 99.96
01540 GUENTHER, JAMES E. FLEX COMP 1579.92
04731 HUNT, JUFRERY FLEX COMP 340.00
01781 JONES, DANIEL G. FLEX COMP 1435.0i
333.59
01908 LUBASH, DOUGLAS D. FLEX COMP
05757 ~GHUSSEN, MIRE FLEX COMP 28.77
FLEX COMP 420.00
448.77
:' 358.30
02054 MORGAN, NANCYLOU M. FLEX COMP :
06040 REDLIN, ROM FLEX COMP · 117.33
02439 RiORDAM, ROBERT FLEX COMP J~:' 483.68
02508 SCHULTZ, WALTER A FLEX COMP ?:~ .. 550.29
02830 REFiKIU, MICHAEL J. FLEX COMP ..-~ 89.00~ · . .
REPORT: APBOARDRNT GENERATED: i EEP 80 07:17 RUN: TBURSUAY AUG1601 16:10 PAGE 18
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TNUSTRES FROM AUGUST 01 200I TO AUGUST 17 2001
DENT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02631 STEPHENSON, MICHAEL R. FLEX COMP 510.00
02710 TRACY, RICHARD L. FLEX COMP 324.50
02853 WERDERITCH, ~DAL5 C. FLEX COMP 216.17
02872 WIDMER, CAROL L. FLEX COMP 528.00
TOTAL 13350.96
790
00121 FIRET NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO SAVINGS BONDS 8/9/01 200.00
06253 JUNIUS, JOHN REFUND 100.00
02072 MOUNT PDOSRECT PUBLIC LIBRARY 6TH ALLOCATION 859.44
01719 NCPERS GROUP LIFE _ :. MONTH OF 8/2001 249.00
02622 STATE OF ILLINOIS LIQUOR APPLICANT RECORD CHECK 152.00
LIQUOR APPLICANT 76.00
228.00
02689 THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT BOND MONEY I075.00
BONN MONEY 3200.00
BOND MONEY 1750.00
BOND MONEY 500.00
BOND MONEY 600.00
7125.00
00128 VILLAGE OF MOU~ PROSPECT RECLAS ESCROW-POLICE TICKETS I568.00
DI SBURELMEN~ 8600.00
10168.00
04990 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE WISC INCOME TAX 463.00
06245 Y B CONSTRUCTION REFUND 2673.00
TOTAL 22065.44
GRAND TOTAL 1750851.78
GENERATED: 1 HEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY AUG1601 16:10 PAGE 19
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROW AUGUST 01 2001 TO AUGUST 17 2001
S~ARY BY FUND
001 GEREREL FUND 432066.65
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 115335.30
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 24933.43
070 CC~fl~UNITY REVELP~T BLOCK GRNT 4405.94
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMFLT FUND [3574.07
525 SERIES 2001 PROJECT ~D 101.40
550 DOWNTOWN FLDEVLP~T CONST 930.00
560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 241201.42
590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 2227.24
610 WATER AND SEWER FUND 313321.48
630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENRE FUND 2192.05
660 VEHICLE MAIN~FLANCE FUND 22333.20
670 VEHICLE REPLACEMFLT FUND 299527.10
690 RISK ~AGREENT FUND 238942.40
710 POLICE PENSION FUND 4343.70
770 FLWNCOMP ESCROW FUND 13350.96
790 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 22065.44
TOTS: 1750851,78
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMOR^NDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 16, 2001
SUBJECT: BELLA CAPRI RESTAURANT, 1724 WEST GOLF ROAD
On Thursday, August 16, the Village Manager and Village Attomey met with Ms. Elisa
Pirrone and her attorney to discuss Ms. Pirrone's request to issue a Class XX Liquor
License to Bella Capri Restaurant, 1724 West Golf Road. The Class XX License is a
special category License that allows for the Village to impose special conditions on the
privilege of selling alcohol. With this Class XX License, the liquor dispensing
parameters would mirror that of a Class S License, which provides for full service
alcohol in a restaurant with a lounge.
The issuance of a Class XX License in this case is tied to a prior, unapproved change of
ownership from the previous operator and License holder, Robert Rovito to Ms. Pirrone.
The Village's Liquor Code provides that all changes in ownership involving more than
5% of stock transferred be pre-approved by the Village Board. Additionally, the
standard background check by the Police Department of the "new" owner and
managers revealed that the proposed manager was unfit to manage a restaurant with a
Mount Prospect Liquor License.
In consultation with Ms. Pirrone and her attorney, the Liquor Commissioner established
a number of specific conditions that would allow the business to be operated within the
rules and regulations of the Mount Prospect Liquor Code. Ms. Pirrone and her attorney
have assured the Liquor Commissioner that all conditions will be complied with. They
also understand that failure to do so could result in the suspension or revocation of the
Class XX License.
t is anticipated that if, after a reasonable I~eriod of time, the operation of the business
continues without incident or problem, a Class S Liquor License could be issued to
Ms. Pirrone at some point in the future with Village Board approval.
Should you consider this request favorably, it would be appr°~riate to adopt the
Ordinance creating a Class XX Liquor License.
MEJ/rcc ~
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES Of THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ON E: Treat in accordance with Subsection A of Section 13.108 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect, as amended, the Corporate Authorities shall determine the number of Liquor Licenses
available in each Classification and shall establish a list specifying the number of Liquor Licenses authorized.
Said list is hereby amended by decreasing the number of Class S Liquor Licenses by One (1) Bella Capri
Restaurant, 1724 West Golf Road and increasing the number of Class XX Liquor Licenses by One (1) BeIIa
Capri Restaurant, 1724 West Golf Road. Said list is as follows:
Zero (0) Class A License
Two (2) Class B Licenses
Eight (8) Class C Licenses
One (1) Class D License
One (1) Class E License
One (1) Class G License
Zero (0) Class H License
Zero (0) Class M License
One (1) Class P License
Fifteen (15) Class R Licenses
Fifteen (15) Class S Licenses
One (1) Class T License
One (1) Class XX License (with conditions as
attached to License)
Seven (7) Class W Licenses
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its p_assage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. -
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001.
Village President
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
Class F:stablishment Number
A 0
B Famous Freddie's; Ye Olde Town Inn 2
C Alvee's Liquors; I~alzano Liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Dominick's (Mt. Prospect Plaza);
Gold Eagle Liquors; Jay Liquors;
Mt, Prospect Liquors; Osco Drugs 8
D Prospect Moose Lodge
E Bristol Court Banquet Hall
G Mt. Prospect Park District-Golf Course 1
H 0
M 0
P CVS Pharmacy
R Artemis; Chungkiwa Restaurant; Cuisine of India;
Fellini; Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); Han River;
House of Szechwan; Izakaya Sankyu; Little America;
Nina Restaurant; Pusan; Red A Chinese Restaurant;
SakUra; Taqueria Fiesta; Torishin 15
S Applebee's; El Sombrero; Jake's Pizza; Jameson's Charhouse;
Kampai; The Loft; Mrs. P & Me; New Shin Jung;
Nikki D's Charhouse; Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant; --
Pap's Grill & Bar; Retro Bistro; Rokudenashi; Sam's Place 15
T Brunswick Zone-Thunderbird Lanes 1
XX Bella Capri Restaurant 1
W BOMPS; Frankie's Fast Food; Kate's Thai Kitchen;
Los Arcos Restaurant; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace;
Photo's Hot Dogs _Z7
53
vwl
7/2/01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 418 SOUTH NA-WA-TA AVENUE
WHEREAS, Thomas and Lisa George (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed
a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 418 S. NaWaTa Avenue
(hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property'), legally described as follows:
Property Index Number. 08-11-401-020
Lot 10 on Block 20 i~ prospect Park Country Club Subdivision, being a
Subdivision of the SE N of Section 11 and the South 15 acres of the East %
of the NE N of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the 3rd
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation to construct an unenclosed covered
porch that encroaches 7 feet into the required 20 foot exterior side yard; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Conditional Use being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 15-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 28th day...of-June, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13th day of June, 200~1; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations
to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of
ZBA 15-01; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined tha~ the same meetS the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the PrOPosed Variation would be in the
best interest of the Village. ·
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF ~' '
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK CO.UNTY ILLINOIS: .....
418 S. NaWaTa Avenue
Page 2/2
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Variation for the construction of an unenclosed that encroaches seven
feet into the required 20 foot exterior side yard, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which
is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", with the condition that
only the porch show in Exhibit "A" encroach into the setback.
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR: This Orc'tin'ance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001..
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe .-
Village Clerk
H:~,CLKO',G EN~iles~WiN~ORDiNANC~ConUse, 418 NaWaTa,porch, Jul ~C01 .doc
Village of Mount ProsPect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAELE.$ANONIS, VILLAGEMANAGER
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, SENIOR PLANNER "'" ~'
DATE: AUGUST 17~ 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA- 19-01 - VARIATION (REAR SETBACK)
350 WEGO TRAIL
JOHN & KELLY D'ACQUISTO - APPLICANTS
Attached please find a north elevation, a floor plan for the proposed addition, and e-mail from the petitioner.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
August 21, 2001 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questiOns related to this matter.
Connoll¥, Judy
From: kelly, dacquisto@advocatemedical.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:07 PM
To: Timcorcor@aol.com; Lohrik3@aoLcom; irvana@northstarnet.org; Maznawata@home.com
Cc: pwhoefert@aol.com; JConnoll@mountprospect.org
Subject: Village Board Meeting / 350 S. We-Go Trail
Good afternoon everyone. My name is Kelly D'Acquisto and I am writing to you on
behalf of myself, my husband John and our 5 month old son, Tyler. We were on
the agenda at the August 7th Village Board Meeting last week, as some of you may
have seen. After the last meefing we spoke to Paul Hoefert regarding our
variation request. He was very kind to take the ~lme to talk to us and our
discussion with him was very helpful. He suggestad I also call each of you to
discuss our case.
Since the meeting on Au~us5 7th we have spoken ~o Judy Connolly at Village
Hall She suggested we submit s floor plan and a North elevation, which we have
completed and are submitting to her today. I believe those will be included in
your packets. We also spoke to her regarding any other ideas or suggestions the
village staff may have regarding our proposal. She was very kind and spoke to
the director, Bill Cooney on our behalf, but they were unable to come up with
any other suggestions. We have worked very closely with Judy over the past few
months, she has been so helpful with this project.
We are writing because we wanted to know if any of you had any other suggestions
or opinions you would be willing to share with us about our request. We would
love zo hear your thoughts about our case and any advice or ideas that maybe we
have not thought of already.
Thank you so much for your time We look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Kelly, John and Tyler D'Acquisto
847-390-5929 (Daytime)
847-967-1846 (Evening)
i 7
,00'[6 n "?
>~wt~ Ol~n~ ,~ ! , ~.,~
'~
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMLrNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: AUGUST 3,2001
SUBJECT: ZBA- 19-01 - VARIATION (REAR SETBACK)
350 WEGO TRAIL
JOHN & KELLY D'ACQUISTO - APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to deny Case ZBA-19-01, a Variation request for
an attached garage in the rear yard, as described in detail in the attached ZBA staffreport. The Zoning Board of
Appeals heard the request at their July 26, 2001 meeting.
The subject property is a comer lot located in a single-family residential neighborhood. The petitioners would
like to conver~ the existing attached garage m living space and construct a new attached garage in front of the
existing garage. They would like to maintain the existing setback, which is 13'10" but the Zoning Ordinance
requires that the new garage comply with current codes and be located 25-feet from the rear lot line (north lot
line). The proposal requires Variation approval because the garage would encroach 11'2" into the rear yard
setback.
The ZBA discussed the impact of the proposed setback on the adjacent properties, how other homes in the
neighborhood appeared to be built offset to allow more sunlight to reach the neighbors' houses, and that the
proposed variation would be applicable to the entire north lot line. After the ZBA discussed Zoning Code
standards for Variations, they voted 3-2 (Keith Youngquist abstained from voting) to recommend denial of a
request for a Variation to allow a 13'10" rear yard at 350 WeGo Trail, Case No. ZBA-19-01.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
August 7, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
William J. ~ooney, Jr., 3dCP
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: JULY 19, 2001
HEARING DATE: JLrLy 26, 2001 -
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-01 - REAR YARD VARIATION -ATTACHED GA_RAGE
350 WEGO TRAIL (D'ACQUISTO RESIDENCE)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: John & Kelly D'Acquisto
350 S. WeGo Trail
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
STATUS OF PETITIONER: .Property Owners
PARCEL NUMBER: 08-11-106-013
LOT SIZE: 11,375 square feet
EXISTING ZONING: R1 Single Family Kesidence
EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Kesidence
LOT COVERAGE: 34% proposed
45% maximum per RI district
REQUESTED ACTION: VARIATION TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE IN THE REAR
SETBACK. -
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The subject property is an existing home with an attached garage located on a corner lot on a single-family
residential street. According to the Zoning Ordinance, the front ofthe lot is along Lincoln Street and the exterior
side yard is on WeGo Trail (see enclosed appendix from the Zoning Ordinance that identifies the front, side and
rear of a lot) even though the main entrance to the house is from WeGo Trail. The petitioners would like to
convert the existing attached garage into living space and construct a new attached garage in front of it. The
existing attached garage is located 13.83-feet from the rear prope~y line and is a legal non-conformity because
code currently requires a 25-foot rear setback. The garage is allowed to remain, be repaired, etc., but the extent of
the non-conformity cannot be increased (Sec. 140.402.B). Therefore, the petitioners are required to maintain a
25-foot rear setback for the new garage even though the existing garage is located 13.82-feet from the rear lot
tine.
In the enclosed application, the petitioners state that the home is a comer lot and that the front of the lot is
considered to be along WeGo Trail. Therefore, the area they would like to build the new garage should be
considered a side yard. The petitioners state that building the new garage with a 25-foot setback would require
changing the roofline, which would change the look of the home and ultimately alter the character of the
neighborhood.
BA-19-01
ZBA Meeting of Suly 26, 2001
Page 2
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and
visited the site.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Variation Standards
Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203:C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code. The section contains seven sp~ecific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These
standards relate to:
A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently
having an interest in the property;
o lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
t~ protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The subject parcel is an 11,375 square foot rectangular parcel that is out of any flood zone. The parcel is
developed with a single family home and an attached garage. The applicants propose to construct a 24' x 23.75'
attached garage 13.83-feet fi.om the north lot line.
The petitioners' reasons for the proposed variation relate to the house being on a comer lot and maintaining the
current look and character of the house. However, the standards for a variation are based on physical
characteristics of the property and the impact of the variation on the adjacent properties and the neighborhood.
The lot and house are typical of other properties in the Village and the garage could be built according to current
Zoning requirements. Locating the attached garage 13.83-feet from the rear lot line would not be likely to have a
negative effect on the character of the neighborhood or the public welfare, but the request fails to meet the
standards for a Variation as required by the Zoning Ordinance.
In this case, the existing rear setback, 13.$3-feet, does not comply with current code requirements, but is
consistent with the rear setback of the property north of the subject property, which is 16.$3-feet. While the
proposed attached garage would alter the view ou~ from the adjacent property, it is not different fi.om what is
located on the adjacent lot. In addition, the petitioners argue that the appearance of the house and character of the
neighborhood would be adversely impacted if the new garage met the 25-foot rear setbac~k:
RECOMMENDATION'
While the proposed variation may be consistent with conditions of other properties in this neighborhood and not
have a detrimental effect on neighborhood character, the submittal fails to support a finding of hardship, as
required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings,
Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend denial of the proposed Variation to permit an attached garage to
encroach 11'2" (11.17') into the required 25-foot rear side yard setback for the residence at 350 WeGo Trail, Case
No. ZBA-19-01. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur:
William 3. Cooney, AIC~, Director of Community Development
14.2501 14.2501
ARTICLE XXV
APPENDIX OF ILLUSTRATIONS
SECTION:
14.2501: Illustrations
14.2501: ILLUSTRATIONS:
A. Lot Width And Lot Depth Explained:
REAR LOT LI1NE
MEASURED ALONG
· FRONT SETBACK LiNE
:..
FRONT LOT LiNE
Village of Mount Prospect
14.2501 14.2501
C. Required Yards Illustrated:
REAR LOT LiNE
REQ~RED
-- !i STREET
D. Transitional Yards:
V£llage of Mou~t Prospect
J '~Nn ~B ,0£ 0
,
,00'[6 13._
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Plarming Division
I00 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Variation Request
The Zoning Board of Appeals has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and
those variation requests that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's
Zoning Ordinance.
PETITION FOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REVIEW ~ Village Board Final [21 ZBA Final
~ CaseNumber. ':: : .: : ·
Date
of 8ubmissi0ii
m Hearing Date . · ' ' .
Common Address(es) (Slreet Number, Street)
3S0 S, ~qe-&o Tr~i/ Moanf ?ros, prc~ tL
Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
z ObillOloDl,5
~ Legal Des~ iption (attach additional sheets if necessary)
~ Name Telephone (day) · --
~ Co¢oration I I Telephone (evenkg)
~ ~ S~eet Address F~
i ~i~ . State Zip Code Pager
~ Oq
~ ~m~h~el~na IL GO 0
Interest ~ Prope~
Legal Description of 350 S. We-Go Trail, Mount Prospect
Lot 19 in Afini's First Addition to Mount Prospect, being a Subdivision of part of the
South 990 feet of the West half of the Northeast quarter and parr of the South 990 feet of
the East half of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, Township 41 North. Range 11 East
of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof registered in the Office of
the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, on December 2, 1953, as Document No.
1496955.
m Name Telephone (day)
I Corporation
~ Telephone (evening)
mC)
~ ~' Street Address Fax:
~ Ci~ State Zip Code ?a§er
Developer
Name Telephone (day)
Address Fax
Attorney
~ Name Telephone (day)
'~ Address Fax
~ ~ Engineer
~ ~ Name Telephone (day)
r~ ~ Address Fax
Architect ' .
Address Fax
Landscape Architect
Name Telephone (day):
Address Fax
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 Fax 847.818.5.~_9~*
2 TDD 847.392.6064
Code Section(s) for which Variation(s) is (are) Requested
Summary and Justification~for Requested Variation(s), Relate Justification to the Attached Standards for Variations
Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully Completed and all required plans and other materials
have been satisfactorily submitted to the planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the
appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given
to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the
property, grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours
for visual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materia/B~bmitted in association width this application are true and
accurate to the best of~'ny knowledge. . ~-x ,-~ f '~. , , '
If applicant is not property, owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the
associated supporting material.
Property. Owner Date
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 Fax 847.818.5329
3 TDD 847.392.6064
Summary and Justification for Requested Variation
350 S. We-Go Trail, Mount Prospect
We are seeking a variation to be granted for an addition to the property at 350 S. We-Go
Trail. The reason we are seeking a variation is because we would like to chan~e the
existing 2.5 car attached garage into living space and then we would like to ad~t a new 2.5
car attached garage in it's place, directly in front of the old one.
Due to the particular physical shape of the home and it's unique comer lot location, what
would normally be considered a side yard for most homes is considered a rear yard for
this home. Currently, the existing 2.5 car attached garage is 13.83 feet from the rear lot
line. We are seeking the variation in order to keep the new garage consistent with the
existing garage's structure.
Being forced to comply with the 25 foot rear setback would create a hardship for us. It
would force us to completely change the em-rent roofline of the home, unnecessarily. It
would force us to remove a beautiful, mature maple tree from the parkway in front of the
home and lastly, but most importantly, it would not follow tbe existing rear setback of the
current garage which would alter the look and character of the home, and the
nei~hborhood.
The proposed variation will not impair adequate light or air supply to adjacent properties.
tt will not increase congestion of public streets. It will not increase danger of fire, create
drainage problems or endanger public safety. It will not be detrimental to the public or
other properties in any way. It will, in fact, be consistent with the home and garage
extension of the property adjacent to our home.
Granting of the variation will allow us to create an addition to our home that is condusive
to the neighborhond~ It will ensure that the essential character of the home and the
neighborhood will not be altered in any way. It will allow us to follow the existing rear
setback and structure that our home and the home adjacent to ours currently follow.
We greatly appreciate your time and consideration of our request Thank you.
LINCOLN ST.
Iulyl9,2001
Ms. Judy Connolly
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, Il. 60056
Re: D'Acquisto Residence
350 Wego Street
Mount Prospect, Ill,
Proposed Addition
Dear Ms. Cormolly
In reviewing the proposed addition at 350 Wego Street, Mount Prospect, my
recommendation is to follow the current roofline and structure of the home which will
maintain the structural integrity and support of the roof. In addition, complying with the
current setback guidelines may compromise the existing structural integrity of the home.
In my opinion this will also keep with the character of the existing streetscape.
Sincerely,
Christopher J. Walsh
Custom Home Designer
Tony Andrews,
General Contractor
o~o~e.~o~O T'o ~,~/~ './~-r~ v/~4
~lLo~ ~ ~IC~ MI~ I~ O~L~ 7~tO'' ~'~'
~t¢~T~ v~,F~:o~ ~.v,~w i~_N°V sHo~.
~TffouT ~e~ ~ v~iAT:o~ T'°
Page 1 of 1
,\
\
Page 1 of 1
" Page 1 of 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO, ZBA-19-2001 Hearing Date: July 26, 2001
PETITIONER: Kelly & John D'Acquisto
PUBLICATION DATE: July 1 I, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Variation to allow construction of a garage in the rear setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: . ~Hal Ettinger
Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
· Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Kelly & John D'Acquisto
Henry W. Youngquist
Tony Andmws
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes of the June 28, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0; Merrill Cotton and Keith Youngquist were not at the June meeting. At 8:01 p.m., after hearing two
cases, Ms. Arlene Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-19-01, a request for a Variation to allow construction of a garage
in the rear setback.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the subject
property is an existing home with an attached garage located on a comer lot. Per the Zoning Ordinance, the front of
the lot is along Lincoln Street and the exterior side yard is on WeGo even though the main entrance to the house is
from WeGo Trail.
Ms. Connolly said the petitioners would like to convert the existing attached garage into living spac~ and construct a
new attached garage idirectly in front of it, maintaining the existing 13' 11" rear setback and explained that current code
requires a 25-foot setback. The petitioners are seeking a variation to construct a new, attached garage that has a 13' 11"
rear setback.
Ms: Connolly reported that, in order to approve the Variation, the request has to meet the seven standards listed in the
Zoning Ordinance and said the standards relate to: the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a
specific property not generally applicable to other properties; not created by any person presently having an interest in
the property; a lack of desire to increase financial gain; and protection of the public welfare, other property, and
neighborhood character.
Ms. Connolly reported that staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. The subject
parcel is an 11,375 square foot rectangular parcel that is out of any flood zone. The parcel is developed with a single
family home and an attached garage. She said the existing rear setback does not comply with current code
requirements, but is consistent with the rear setback of the property north of the subject property, which has a 16'10"
rear setback. The proposed attached garage is not different from what is located on the adjacent lot, but it would alter
the view for the adjacent property. In addition, the petitioners state in their application that the appearance of the
house and character of the neighborhood would be adversely impacted if the new garage met the 25-foot rear setback.
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA- 19-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Ms. Connolly explained that the petitioners' reasons for the proposed variation relate to the house being on a corer lot
and maintaining the current look and character of the house. However, the standards for a variation are based on
physical characteristics of the property and the impact of the variation on the adjacent properties and the neighborhood.
The lot and house are typical of other properties in the Village and the garage could be built according to current
Zoning requirements. Locating the attached garage 13.83-feet from the rear lot line would not be likely to have a
negative effect on the character of the neighborhood or the public welfare, but the request fails to meet the standards
for a Variation as required by the Zoning Ordinance. While the proposed variation may be consistent with conditions
of other properties in this neighborhood and not have a detrimental effect on neighborhood character, the submittal
fails to support a fmding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these
fmdings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend denial of the proposed Variation to permit an attached garage to
encroach into the required 25-foot rear side yard setback for the residence at 350 WeGo Trail Ms. Connolly said the
Village Board's decision is final for this case.
Ms. Juracek asked if petitioners were present and wished to speak. Kelly and John D'Acqnlsto were sworn in. Ms.
D'Acquisto stated they had just closed on their WeGo home, which they purchased because they love the
neighborhood. She said the house was small with not much living space and that they wanted to expand and add a
family room, since there was no basement. She said that an addition to the back of their house (west lot line) would
leave no backyard for their son to play in and that it would require covering up the windows of the bedrooms, and limit
the light to the bedrooms. She said that an addition in the front yard would disrupt a large maple tree and the
driveway. Also, there would be a cost savings in not ripping up the driveway. Ms. D'Acquisto said that they chose
their proposed addition design because this design would also allow them to maintain the same roof structure and not
have to build a double gable roof, which she felt would not be in character with the neighboring homes.
Mr. Rogers asked about the size of the maple tree and was told it was about 50' in height, with a very wide trunk.
Merrill Cotton asked if the proposed garage would extend further toward WeGo than the neighbor's garage. Ms.
D'Acquisto said it would be at the same distance from WeGo and look more like the neighbor's house.
Ms. Juracek compared the petitioners' house to a house on WeGo and Pendleton Streets and said she thought it
appeared that the houses had been originally built offset as they were in order to allow more sunlight to reach the
neighbors' houses and to provide a wider vista. She then asked if members of the audience wished to speak.
Henry W. Youngquist, 320 S. WeGo Trail, was sworn in. He directed the Zoning Board'_s-attention to a letter he had
sent them, which protests this request. He said that the view from his sunroom would be drastically reduced with the
proposed plan and that he would only have a view of a brick wall. He pointed out that the petitioners could add on to
the front or back of the house without encroaching into the required setbacks.
Hal Ettinger pointed out to the D'Acquistos that they would need to contend with a difference in grade level and would
need to address that with a step up to their existing living area.
Tony Andrews, 8212 N. Newcastle, Niles, contractor for the proposed addition, was sworn in. After some discussion
with Mr. Ettinger, Mr. Andrews came to the conclusion that a step from one area to the next would accommodate the
change in grade level.
Mr. Henry Youngquist returned to the podium to state that the tree in question is a sugar maple. He said that it was
very brittle and not in good shape because of all the salt that it comes in contact with in winter. He said he thinks the
tree will need to be removed shortly and that it should not be the basis for allowing the home to encroach into the
setback.
Several Zoning Board members had questions about the staff sketches, which showed the location of the garage
complying with the 25-foot rear setback. Ms. Connolly said that the exhibits were prepared to illustrate that the
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-19:2001
Arlene jUracek, Chairperson Page 3
improvements could be made while staying within the prescribed setbacks. Ms. Juraeek clarified for the Zoning Board
members that they will vote on the plan proposed by the petitioner.
Mr. Keith Youngquist told the group that he would abstain from voting, since Mr. Henry Youngquist is his father and
that he had been raised in the home at 320 We 3o Trail. Mr. Youngquist said that this is a request for a substantial
variation to a rear yard setback and that he has always voted no in such cases and would vote no again if he were to
vote on this case. He said he did not approve of the design, which did not show a clear reason for the request. He
pointed out that the variation, if granted, would apply to the entire north setback line and could lead to further additions
on that side.
Mr. Ettinger said that a hardship had not been proven in this case.
Ms. Juracek said that the petitioners request was logical, but that the petitioners had alternatives in which to expand the
house and acquire more living space in a manner that complied with the required setbacks
At 8:40, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing.
Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve the request for a Variation to allow
construction of a garage to encroach 11'2" into the rear setback at 350 S. WeGo, Case No. ZBA-19-01. Leo Floros
seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros,
NAYS: Ettinger, Rogers and Juracek
ABSTENTION: Youngquist
Motion was denied 3-2.
Ms. Juracek explained that the Village Board's decision would be final for this case and would be heard at their
August 7th meeting.
At 10:00 p.m., after the Zoning Board heard three more cases and tabled Case No. 2~A-21-01 to the August 23rd
meeting, Merrill Cotten made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Hal Ettinger. The motioj[ was approved by a voice
vote and the meeting was adjourned.
VWL
7/26/01
8/1/01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 350 SOUTH WE-GO TRAIl
WHEREAS, John and Kelly D'Acquisto (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have
filed a petition for a variation with respect to property located at 350 South We-Go
Trail (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as
follows:
Lot 19 in Afini's 1st Addition to Mount Prospect, being a Subdivision of part of
the South 990 feet of the West ¼ of the NE ¼ and part of the South 990 feet
of the East ¼ of the NW ¼ of Sec. 11, Township 41 N., Range 11, East of the
3rd Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof registered in the Office of
the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, IL on December 2, 1953 as Document
#1496955
Property Index Number: 08-11-106-013
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a variation to allow for the construction of an
attached garage, with an eleven-foot, two-inch (11'2") encroachment into the rear
side yard setback; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a variation being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 19-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 26t~ day of July, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having
been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 11~ day of July, 2001;
and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation for denial of the Petitioners' request to the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
Page 2/2
350 S. We-Go Trail
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same
meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed variation
would be in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of
fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant a variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village
Code, to allow the for the construction of an attached garage, with an eleven-foot,
two-inch (11'2") encroachment into the twenty-five foot (25') required rear side yard
setback, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of August, 2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VWL
7/26/01
6/1/01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 350 SOUTH WE-GO TRAIL
WHEREAS, John and Kelly D'Acquisto (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have
filed a petition for a variation with respect to property located at 350 South We-Go
Trail (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as
follows:
Lot 19 in Afini's lStAddition to Mount Prospect, being a Subdivision of part of
the South 990 feet of the West ~ of the NE ¼ and part of the South 990 feet
of the East ½ of the NW ¼ of Sec. 11, Township 41 N., Range 11, East of the
3ru Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof registered in the Office of
the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, IL on December 2, 1953 as Document
#1496955
Property Index Number: 08-11-106-013
and . ~
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a variation to allow for the construction of an
...... at~ched garage, with an eleven-foot, two-inch (11'2") encroachment into the-mcr
side yard setback; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a variation being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 19-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 26~ day of July, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having
been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 11~ day of July, 2001;
and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted..its findings and
recommendation for denial of the Petitioners' request to the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and · .. '
Page 2/2
350 S. We-Go Trail
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same
meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed variation
would be in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of
fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant-_a..~adation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village
Code, to allow the for the c~onstruction of an attached garage, with an eleven-foot,
two-inch (11'2") encroachment into the twenty-five foot (25') required rear side yard
setback, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of August, 2001.
Gerald L. Fadey
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGEP, MICHAEL SANONIS
FI~OM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JULY 27, 2001
SUBJECT: 2001 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2
PURPOSE:
To present a recommendation the annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2001 and ending
December 31, 2001 be further amended.
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance No. 5162, adopted December 19, 2000, established the annual budget for the year ending
December 31, 2001. The 2001 budget was amended on April 17, 2001 by Ordinance No. 518 I.
DISCUSSION:
We find it necessary to recommend the 2001 budget be further amended to take into account various revenue
and expenditure variances that have surfaced over the past three months;
A proposed ordinance further amending the 2001 annual budget is attached for the Board's consideration.
In total, we are decreasing our revenue projections by $5,332,336 and decreasing the budget for expenditures
by $1,514,789. Following is a brief explanation to some of the more significant budget amendments being
proposed.
Items 1 - 18: These modifications to estimated revenues were discussed as part of the mid-year budget
review. In total, General Fund revenues are increasing $183,161. Much of this has to do with a recently,
unbudgeted grant for single-family rehabilitation in the amount of $132,000.
Items 19 and 20: When the 2001 budget was originally prepared and approved, it was anticipated
that we would be capitalizing interest as part of the proposed Series 200t bond issue to fund the
construction of a new village hall and parking structure. Based upon the Board's recent discussion,
we will not be borrowing funds to pay debt service for the first few years, .Therefore, we.are
reducing estimated revenues for the Series 2001 Debt Service Fund by $2,283,900.
Item 22: The Illinois Department of Transportation recently decided that it would be the lead
agency on the large streetlight grant program included in the original budget. Therefore, we are
reducing revenues and expenditures by $1,146,250.
Budget Amendment No. 2
July 27, 2001
Page Two
Item 23: After the budget was approved we were notified by the State that we were the recipient of
a $400,000 grant for central corridor improvements.
Item 26: If the Village breaks up the proposed bond issuance for the new village hall and parking
structure into two separate bond issues to keep each issue under the $10 million mark, the bonds can
be sold as "bank qualified". This means that banks purchasing the bonds would receive preferential
tax treatment. Bank qualified status would reduce our overall borrowing costs by approximately 20
basis points. We are therefore reducing our projected revenue fi.om bond proceeds by $3,151,500 to
keep the first issue at $10 million.
Item 28: The Village had expected to receive reimbursement for a portion of its TIF environmental
site clean-up costs in the year 200(}. We now expect to receive a total of $350,424 in 2001.
Item 29: The Village had originally expected to receive the proceeds from our sale of the property
at the comer of Northwest Highway and Emerson in 2000. We received the $750,000 in 2001.
Item 33: When the 2001 budget was approved, we believed we were going to receive a $400,000
Operation Green Light grant for train station improvements and would incur the related
expenditures. The grant is now being administered by the State, so our revenues and expenditures
are being adjusted accordingly.
Items 38 - 49: Pursuant to your direction, we are requesting the Cable Teievision budget b~
increased in light of the various intergovernmental agreements entered into during the year. The
Division's budget is being increased $25,441. Projected revenu..~s_~e being increased bg.$21~797
(see Item 11).
Item 51: This request is to budget for the $132,000 single-family rehab grant expenditures (see
Item 10).
Item 55: The Village received a $50,000 grant in 2000 for Police in-car video cameras. The
cameras were ordered in 2000 but did not arrive until early in 2001, thereby requiring a budget
amendment.
Item 56: We are requesting that the budget be increased by $400,000 to account for the
expenditures of a grant received for central corridor improvements (see Item 23).
Item 57: This is the reduction of $I,146,250 from the budget for residential streetlight
improvements given the State is taking the lead on this program (see Item 22).
2
udget Amendment No. 2
July 27, 2001
Page Three
Item 60: The Public Works Depathxient believes that $680,000 of expenditures related to the
Weller Creek improvement project will not be incurred in 2001 as originally budgeted. They
believe this will be the amount needed to be carried over to 2002.
Item 62: The State is going to be the lead agency on the grant program for the train station
improvements. Therefore we need to reduce expenditures by $530,000 (see Items 33 and 34).
Items 63 and 64: Our liability claims are running ahead of budget due to recent claim activity.
Our workers compensation expenses are running under budget. We are recommending $100,000 be
transferred from the workers co~mpensation line-item to the liability claims line-item.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board adopt the proposed ordinance approving Budget Amendment No. 2 to
the 2001 Annual Budget.
DOUGLAS R. EL_LS~NORTH? CPA ....
Copy: Finance Commission
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL
BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2001
AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2001
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have passed
and approved Ordinance No. 2342 which sets the finances of the Village under the "Budget
Officer System"; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid Ordinance and the Statutes of the State of Illinois an
annual budget for the fiscal y6-ar?ommencing January 1, 2001 and ending December 31, 2001
was adopted through the passage of Ordinance No. 5162 approved by the Corporate Authorities
of the Village of Mount Prospect on December 19, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have passed
and approved Ordinance 5181 on April 17, 2001, amending the annual budget for the fiscal year
commencing January 1, 2001 and ending December 31, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have further
reviewed certain additions and changes to the aforesaid budget for the fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2001 and ending December 31, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect believe the
......... ~li~n~es, as Specified on the attached January 1, 2001 through December ~31.,_200.L-Badget~-
Amendment No. 2 to be in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, there are adequate revenues and reserves in each of the Funds whose budget is
being increased to cover the budget changes reflected in Budget Amendment No. 2, attached
hereto.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
~: That the fiscal year budget for January I, 200i through December 31} 2001
for the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby further amended, as detailed on-Budget Amendment
No. 2 attached hereto.
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAYES:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of August, 2001.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Budget Amendment No. 2
Fiscal Year from January t, 200t through December 31, 2001
Revenues
Original Amended
Item Revenue Increase Revenue
No. Fund/Program/Classitication Account # Account Description Estimate (Decrease) Estimate
General Fund
I Other Taxes 0010000-410000 Sales Tax Revenue 7,731,600 (28,694) 7,702,906
2 Other Taxes 0010000-410400 Food & Beverage Tax 489,600 (15.935) 473,665
3 Other Taxes 0010000-414000 Real Estate Transfer Tax 682,900 67,100 750,000
4 Other Taxes 0010000-417100 Telecemmuntcetions Tax 846,000 29,000 875,000
5 Other Taxes 0010000-417200 Utility Tax - NIGAS 208.000 121,000 329,000
6 Licenses. Permits & Fees 0010000-420100 Vehicle Ucenses 1,160,000 (20,000) 1,140,000
7 Licenses, Permits & Fees 0010000-427000 Infrastructure Maint. Fee 420,000 (110,000) 310,000
8 Intergovernmental 0010000-430100 State Inceme Tax 4,119,300 (65,513) 4,053,787
9 Intergovemrnentel 0010000-430400 State Use Tax 637,900 38,000 675,900
10 Intergovernmental 001~)00-435211 Single Family Rehab Grant 0 132,000 132,000
11 Charges for Services 00t~000-444100 Cable Programming Fees 16,640 21,797 38,437
12 Fines 0010000-450100 Parking Fines 260,000 (40,000) 220,000
13 Fines 0010000-450300 Cimuit Court Fines 210,000 (30,000) 180,000
14 Investmcmt Income 0010000.460100 Interest Income 400,000 15,000 415,000
15 Reimbursements 0010000-470800 Property Damage Reimb. 13,000 5,800 18,800
16 Reimbursements 0010000-470900 Other Reimbursements 28,000 26,691 54,691
17 Other Revenue 0010000-480900 Miscellaneous Income 50,000 21,800 71,800
18 Other Revenue 0010000-481000 IDB Revenue 0 15,115 15,115
All other General Fund accounts 10,727,870. 0 10,727,870
Total General Fund 28,000,810 183,161 28,183,971
Series 2001 Debt Service Fund
19 Investment Income 1800000-460100 Interest Income 10;400 (10,400) · 0'
20 Other Financing Sources 1800000-494100 Bond Proceeds 2,273,500 12,273,500) 0
Total Sedes 2001 Debt Service Fund 2,283,900 (2.283,900) 0
Capital Improvements Fund
21 Intergovemmental Revenues 5100000-435203 General Store Grant 30,000 20,000 50,000
22 Intergovernmental Revenues 5100000-435220 STP Grant, Street Lights 1,673,350 (1,146.250) 527,100
23 Intergovernmental Revenues 5100000-435225 Central Corridor Impr. Grant 0 400,000 400,000
24 Investment Income 5100000-460100 Interest Income 60.000 40,000 100,000
Ail other Capital Improvements Fund accounts 940,667 0 940.667
Total Capital Improvements Fund 2,704,01__7 (686,250) 2,017,767
Series 2001 Project Fund
25 Investment Income 5250000-460100 Interest Income 62,000 (10,000) 52,000
26 Other Financing Sources 525000-494100 Bond Proceeds 13,151,500 (3,151,500) 10,000,000
Total Series 200t Project Fund 13,213,500 (3,161,500) 10.052,000
Downtown Redevelopment Constr. Fund '
27 Investment income 5500000-460100 Interest Income 24,000 (18,000) 6,000
28 Reimbursements 5500000-471200 Site Clean-up Reimburse. 0 350,424 350,424
29 Other Financing Sources 5500000-494600 Sale of Property 925.000 748,355 1.673,355
Ail other Downtown Redevelopment Constr. Fund accounts 0 0 0
Total Downtown Redevelopment Constr. Fund 949,000 * 1,080,77__9 ~ 2.029~779
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Budget Amendment No. 2
Fiscal Year from January 1,2001 through December 31,200t
Revenues
Original Amended
Item Revenue Increase Revenue
No, Fund/Pro,ram/Classification Account # Account Description Estimate (Decrease) Estimate
Street Improvement Construction Fund
30 Other Taxes 5600000-417200 Utility Tax - NIGAS 135,200 60,000 195,200
31 Licenses, Permits & Fees 5600000-420100 Vehicle Licenses 232,000 (4,000) 228,000
All other Street Improvement Constr. Fund accounts 1,950,733 0 1,950,733
Total Street Improvement Constr. Fund 2,317,933 56,000 2,373,933
Water and Sewer Fund
32 Reimbursements 6100000-470800 Property Damage Reimb. 36,000 13,420 49,420
All other Water and Sewer Fund accounts 7,813,350 0 7,813,350
Total Water and Sewer Fund __ ~.. 7,849,350 13,4__~_20 7,862,770
Parking System Revenue Fund
33 Intergovernmental Revenues 6300000-435203 Operation Green Light Grant 400,000 (400,000) 0
34 Intergovernmental Revenues 6300000-435204 STP Grant 130,000 (130,000) 0
All other Parking System Revenue Fund accounts 347,400 0 347,400
Total Parking System Revenue Fund 877,400 (530,000) 347,400
Vehicle Replacement Fund
35 Charges for Services 6700000-442810 Engineering Charges 8,512 (6,000) 2,512
Ail other Vehicle Replacement Fund accounts 1,131,328 0 1,131,328
Total Vehicle Replacement Fund 1,139,840 (6,000) 1,133,840
Computer Replacement Fund
36 Charges for Services 6800000-442750 Public Works Dept Charges 18,563 1,954 20,517
All other Computer Replacement Fund accounts .......... - ....... 113,536 0 113,536
Total Computer Replacement Fund ..... ' '' 132,099 t,954 134,053
Total Estimated Revenues
Funds being changed 59,467,849 (5,332,336) 54,135,513
All other Village Budget accounts 21,806,096 0 21,806,096
Total Estimated Revenues After Changes 81,273,945 (5.332,336) 75,941,609
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Budget Amendment No. 2
Fiscal Year from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001
Expenditures
Current Anmnded
Item Budget Increase Budget
No. Fund/Pro~ram/Classirmation Account # Account Description Amount (Decrease} Amount
General Fund
Village Manager, Legal Services
37 Contractual Services 0011102-540090 Legal - Special Counsel 40,000 50,000 90,000
Television Services
38 Pereonal Serviees 0011202-500000 Full-Time Wages 66,710 3,780 70,490
39 Personal Services 0011202-500100 Part-'nme Wages 0 8,333 8,333
40 Personal Services 0011202-500200 Seasonal Earnings 2,800 1,200 4,000
41 Personal Services 0011202-500300 Overtime Earnings 3,500 1,500 5,000
42 Employee Benaffis 0011202-510000 FICA - Social Secudty 4,688 918 5,606
43 Employee Bena~ts 0011202-510100 FICA - Medioam 1,096 215 1,311
44 Employee Benefits 0011202-510200 IMRF Expense 4,034 345 4,379
45 Other Employee Costs - .0011202-520000 Training 1,250 250 1,500
46 Other Employee Costs - D011202-520400 Travel and Meetings 1,600 400 2,000
47 Contractual Services 0011202-540615 Equipt. Maintenance 3,300 1,500 4,800
48 Commodities and Supplies 0011202-570080 Other Suppiies 8,500 1,000 9,500
49 Other Equipment 0011202-570001 Cable TV Equipt. - New 9,500 6,000 15,500
Finance Dept., Data Processing
50 Contractual Services 0011703-540610 Computer Maintenance 44,600 14,000 58,600
Corem. Develop., Planning & Zoning
51 Contractual Services 0012102-540950 Single-Family Rehab 0 132,000 132,000
Police Department Admin.
52 Commodities 0015001-570390 Open House Supplies 3,000 800 3,800
PW Streets, Street Maintenance
53 Contractual Services 0015401-540581 ROW Restoration 16,000 5,800 21,800
Miscellanaous Pensions
54 Pension Benefits 0018201-530100 Retirement Pensions . . 2~1~17,0 ~ ~ (5,652) ~ 15,518
210,578 228,041 438,619
All other General Fund Accounts 27,903,730 0 27,903,730
Total General Fund 28,114,308 228,041 28,342,349
Capital Improvement Pund
Village Improvements
55 Other Equipment 5107701-570074 In-Car Video Cameras 0 50,000 50,000
Community Improvements ·
56 Land Improvements 5107702-620008 Corridor Improvements 240,425 400,000 640,425
57 Infrastructure 5107702-590005 Residential Streetlights 1,922,047 (1,t46,250) 775,797
2,162,472 (696,250) t,466,222
Ail other Capital Improve. Fd. Accounts 1,649,37t 0 1,649,371
Total Capital Improvement Fund 3,811,843 (696,250) 3,115,593
Downtown Redevelopment Construction Fund
Downtown Redevelopment Costs
58 Other Expenses 5507703-590035 Site Clean-up 370,000 ' · 100,000 470,000
59 Other Expenses 5507703-590600 Developers Incentive - 0 - 50,000 ~ 50,000
370,000-" 150,000 ' 520,000
Ail other Downtown Redevelopment Constr. Fd. Aeoounts 1,403,792 0 1,403,792
Total Downtown Redevelopment Constr. Fund 1,773,792 _ 150,000 1,923,79~2
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Budget Amendment No. 2
Fiscal Year from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001
Expenditures
Current Amended
Item Budget Increase Budget
No. Fund/Pro~ram/Classification Account # Account Description Amount (Decrease) Amount
Flood Control Constr. Fd
Flood Control Projects
60 Infrastructure 5907704-690102 Weller Creek Improvementa 2,354,080 (680~000) 1,674,080
All other Flood Control Constr. Fd accounts 517,862 0 517,862
Total Flood Control Constr. Fund 2,871,942 (680,000__._~.) 2,191,942
Water and Sewer Fund
Sanitary Sewer Maint. & Repair
61 contractual Services 6105509-540777 Sewer Repair/Replacement 76,350 13,420 89,770
Ail other Water and Sewer Fd account_s. 8,184,955 0 8,184,955
Total Water and Sewer Fund 8,261,305 13,420 8,274,725
Parking System Revenue Fund
Village Improvements
62 Building Improvements 6307701-640014 Train Station Improvements 660,000 (530,000) 130,000
Ail other Parking System Revenue Fund accounts 280,895 0 280,895
Total Parking System Revenue Fund 940,895 (530,000) 410,895
Risk Management Fund
Casualty and Property Insurance
63 Insurance 6908501-560202 Liability Claim~ 100 000 . .100.000 200,000
64 Insurance 6908501-560204 Workers Comp Claims 390,000 (100,000) 290,000
490,000 0 490,000
Ail other Risk Management Fund accounts 3,045,903 0 3,045,903
.T_o_~ta[ Risk Management Fund 3,535,903 0 3,535,903
Total Village Budget
Funds being changed 49,309,988 (1,514,789) 47,795,199
Ail other Village Budget accounts 21,577,195 0 21,577,195
Total Village Budget after Changes 70,887,183 (1,514,789) 69,372,394
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: AUGUST 6, 2001
SUBJECT: PC-11-01/GARLAND'S LOT 1 KESUBDIVISION/2233 S. BUSSE
(PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION CREATING TWO LOTS)
MR. JOHN HEALY, A1LKOW KOAD CONSTKUCTION- APPLICANT
The Plan Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PC-11-01 Garland's Lot 1 Resubdivision,
a request to subdivide one lot and create a two-lot subdivision, as described in detail in the attached staff report.
The Plan Commission heard the request at their July 18, 2001 meeting.
The Plan Commission reviewed the proposed plat. The Plan Commission found that the plat and proposed
easements met Village codes.
The Plan Commission voted 3-0 to recommend approval of the Garland's Resubdivision, Case No. PC-11-01,
2233 S. Busse. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their August 21, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this
matter.
~ilh"am ~. qooney,~' -A1CPl
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MATiHEW SLEDZ, VICE CHAIRMAN
FROM: SUZANNE MAS(~, LONG RANGE PLANNER
DATE: JULY 6, 200i~
MEETING DATE: JLrLy 18, 2001
SUBJECT: PC-11-01/GARLAND'S LOT 1 RESUBDMSION/2233 S. BUSSE
Background
Petitioner: Mr. John Healy
Arrow Road Construction
3401 South Busse
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Requested Action: Plat of resubdivision creating two lots
Analysis
The petitioner is seeking to create two lots of record by subdividing an existing lot. The subject property is
located on South Busse Road. The petitioner will be expanding an existing parking lot to Lot 1. Lot 2 will
remain undeveloped at this time.
The proposed plat of resubdivision seeks to create two lots of record. The plat and new lots comply with
Development Code requirements and the petitioner is not seeking relief from the Development Code or the
Zoning Ordinance.
.Recommendation
The proposed plat of resubdivisi°n is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code
requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Garland's Lot Resubdivision for the property located
at 2233 S. Busse, Mount Prospect, Case No. PC-11-01.
I concur:
' ' . ooney,~ P'
Director of Community Development
H:\GEN~PLNG~PCh°C 2001~taffMemo$~PC-02-01 Maughan Resub(801 Cathy Ln).doc
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: PLAN COMMISSION
FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER
DATE: JULY 6, 2001
SUBJECT: PC-11-01; GARLAND'S LOT 1 RESUBDIVISION
(2233 BUSSE ROAD)
The Engineering Division .has reviewed the Plat of Resubdivision for the subject
property, and finds it meets all requirements and is acceptable. The Engineering Staff
has no objectiOns and approves of the proposed resubdivision.
; ~,, PROJECT LOCATION
-- becker :
X:\FILES\EN GINEER~REV-EN G'~*rowRoad~°c-11-01',App-1 .doc
MINUTES OF T~r~ REGULAR M~ETING OF ~
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
August 1, 12001
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission war called to order by Secretary Carol
Tortorello at ?:02 p.m. at the Village Hall, I00 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Carol Tortorello
Edwin Janus
Bill Reddy
Absent: Matt Sledz, Vice-Chairman
Gary Grouwinkel
Village Staff Present: Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner
Suzaune Mas6, Long Range Planner
Others in Attendance: Linnea Pioro, Camp Fire,"Camp Keel" program
Nancy Corry, Summer Adventure program
April Foley, Mentor program
Dianne Kovack, Clayground Inc.
Barb Eves, Clayground Inc,
Meiissa Sly, District 57
John Healy, Resident
David McArdle, Resident
Lindsay Hopkins, Learning for Life program .
Robert Walsh, Resources for Community Living
2rere Teed, CEDA Northwest Center
Caryn Brauweiler, Children' s Advocacy program
Cynthia Ash, Girl Scouts program
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Carol Totorello asked for comments or changes to the minutes. Bill Reddy
stated that the minutes were not accurate in sunmmfizing his rearons.for not funding the Boy Scouts
program. Ms. Roberts arked Mr. Reddy to submit a brief summary of his reasons for denying funding to
the Boy Scouts program, and Bill Reddy agreed to submit the information. There were no other
comments or changes to the minutes. Bill Reddy moved to approv~ the minutes as corrected a~d Carol
Tortoreilo seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of 34). Carol Tortorello asked staff
to present the first care, PC-114)1.
SUBDMSION:
PC-114) 1 Garland's Lot Resubdivision 2233 South Bnsse
Petitioner: Mr. John Healy, Arrow Road Construction
Staff: Suzanne Mar6, Long Range Planner
The petitioner is seeking to create two lots ofrec°rd by subdividing an existing lot. Arrow Road is
purchasing this lot from a neighboring property owner. The petitioner will be expanding an existing
parking lot to Lot 1. Lot 2 will remain undeveloped at this time. Staff.recommended approval. The plat
was approved 34).
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 2
August 1, 2001
NEW BUSINESS:
Community Development Block (CDBG) FY 2002 Public Heating:
Ms. Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner stated that the purpose of this meeting is to give all interested
parties the opportunity to attend the meeting and discuss the funding recommendations. She said that due
to conflicting schedules, not all Plan Commission members could attend this meeting. Therefore, in order
to allow each member the opportunity to vote on the funding recommendations, members agreed to hold
the public portion of the meeting tonight, but postpone the vote on funding recommendations until the
August 15,2001 Plan Commission meeting.
Seareta~ Carol Tortorello asked Ms. Roberts to give an update on District 57 "Character Counts"
program. Ms. Roberts stated that Melissa Sly, Program Coordinator of the "Character Counts" submitted
a letter with additional information on how CDBG funds would benefit the low and moderate-income
residents of Mount Prospect. Ms. Roberts said that based on an assessment of the letter, the Character
Counts program has two events in mind: supporting etime prevention month at Randhurst with the Mount
Prospect Police Department, and supporting a community cleanup in Spring 2002. She said that the
crime prevention event is an eligible activity that benefits all residents; however, in order to meet HUD's
guidelines, at least 51% of low-income residents must attend the event. Ms. Roberts said that the letter
did not specify how they would determine that at least 51% of low and moderate-income residents would
attend the event. Also, although the enmmunity cleanup would meet HUD's guidelines of benefiting low
and moderate-income residents, the letter did not specify which low and moderate-income area would
benefit from the event. Therefore, the recommendation was made to deny funding to the "Character
Counts" program. The Plan Commission agreed that there is an extra $1,000 to allocate, but postponed
how to allocate the extra funds until the August 15, 2001 Plan Commission meeting.
Secretary Carol Tortorello' opened the Public Hearing at 7:20 pm., and asked applicants applying for
CDBG funds to respond to the funding recommendations in the order that they signed in.
Linnea Pioro of the Camp Fire "Camp Kool" program thanked the Plan Commission for their continued
support of the program. However, she said that their program uses CDBG funds to pay for a portion of
their youth counselors' salaries; therefore, the reduction in funding would reduce the number of
counselors to youth. Edwin Janus stated that the decision to reduce their funding was based on the
limited number of youth served by the program. He said that during FY2000, records showed that the
program served 37 out of 130 youth they proposed to serve from Mount Prospect. Liunea Pioro stated
that the program actually served 72 youth. She agreed to submit information showin_g_the total number of
youth that benefited from the pt:ogram during program year 2000.
Nancy Cony and April Foley expressed appreciation for the Plan Commission's continued support of the.
Summer Adventure and Mentor program. They spoke about the programs that were undertaken this year,
past and future .performances, and their funding needs. Nancy Cony stated that the increase in funding'
would allow her to continue to provide quality services to the youth of Mount Prospect.
Dianne Kovack of Clayground Inc., expressed appreciation for the Plan Commission's continued support
of her arts program. She said that the Center has experience an increase in demand for services due to its
new location; therefore, the additional funding would allow her to respond to the increase in demand. Ed
Janus voiced concerns about the limited number of residents served by the program. He said that during
FY 2000, reenrds showed that the program served 25 out of 60 youth from Mount Prospect. Ms. Kovack
said that the program actually served 87 youth from Mount Prospect. She agreed to submit information
showing the total number of youth that benefited from the program during program year 2000.
Lindsay Hopkins of Boy Scouts of America, Learning for Life program was concerned that the program
was not funded~ She spoke about the benefits of the program to the Iow and moderate-income youth of
Mount Prospect. She also stated that, although they receive funding from Boy Scouts of America, the
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 3
August 1, 2001
Learning for Life program has a separate Board of Directors from Boy Scouts of America. In addition,
she said that the Learning for Life program selects the schools and businesses for its programs, but the
schools and businesses selects the adults who work with the youth. Bill Reddy stated that the decision to
deny funding to the Learning for Life program was based on the fact that Boy Scouts of America does not
consider homosexuals to be acceptable role models for youth. Therefore, as a homosexual, he will not
support a program that considers homosexuals unacceptable role models for youth. Lindsay Hopkins
stated that the Learning for Life program is a subsidiary of Boy Scouts of America, and has a non-
discriminatory policy. Bill Reddy stated that the Learning for Life program is the same agency as Boy
Scouts of America and the contractual agreement is between the yillage and Suburban Northwest Council
and not the Learning for Life pro .~nmn- Edwin Janus voiced support of the Learning for Life program.
Robert-Walsh of the Resources for Community Li~gng spoke about .the programs that were undertaken-
this year, past and future performances, and their funding needs. He made an appeal to maintain the
current level of funding on the basis that the reduction would prevent the agency from expanding its
program. Edwin Janus Stated that the decision to reduce funding was based on the limited number of
residents served during program year 2000. He said that during FY 2000, records showed that the
program served 4 out of 7 residents from Mount Prospect. Mr. Walsh stated that the program actually
served 6 residents of Mount Prospect. He agreed to submit information showing the total number of
residents that benefited from the program during program year 2000.
Jere Teed of CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, "Transitional Living" program spoke about the benefits
of the program to the Mount Prospect community. He expressed concerns about their reduction in
funding and inquired about the funding criteria. Ms. Roberts stated that the decision to reduce'fimding
was based on the limited number of residents served by the program. Ms. Roberts also said that based on
the 2001 six month monitoring site visit, the program did not place any residents from Mount Prospect.
Carolyn Bmuwefler of the Children's Advocacy Center expressed appreciation for the Plan Commission's
continued support of the program. She spoke about the benefits of the program to the community and the
need for the additional funding.
Cynthia Ash of Girl Scouts expressed appreciation for the Plan Commission's support 0fthe program.
She spoke about the purpose of the program and its benefits to the Mount Prospect community. The Plan
Commission reiterated that the program would be given "seed money" and continued funding would be
based on the performance of the agency.
COMM]gNTS AND OTI:W~R BUSINESS:
There were discussions on how to detc.sfine what specific items agencies purchase using CDBG funds
Ms. Roberts stated that programs such as VOMP Summer Adventure & Mentor submit receipts for items
· .purchased using CDBO fimds. The Plan Commission requested census tract information for Boxwood
and Judith Ann area.
Secretary Carol Tortorello closed the public session at 8:15 p.m., Edwin Janus moved to adjourn and Bill
Reddy seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner
Suzanne M~s6, Long Range Planner
H:\GEI~,~XPLNQXPC'~PC 2001Xlviinut~s~8..01-01 (CDBG Public Hearins).doc
VWL
8/13/01
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLATOF RESUBDIVISION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2233 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
WHEREAS, the Petitioner, John Healy, has requested approval of a Final Plat of Subdivision for the
purpose of creating two lots of, record by subdividing one existing lot;
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has recommended approval of the subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the subdivision of one lot of record to create two lots of record is hereby
granted for the propertyat 2233 South Busse Road, and the Final Plat of Subdivision attached to
this Resolution as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording. Such Plat
and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part o[ this Resolution.
SECTION TWO: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of August, 2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER "~'~ ~-r~
DAVID STRAHL, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: CABLE PRODUCTION COORDINATOR~ , ti ~
DATE: AUGUST 8, 2001
SUBJECT: INCLUSION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 PROGRAMMING
Recently, discussions were held regarding the inclusion of Community Consolidated
School District 59 programming with MPTV's current access television programming.
Several meetings were held with Distdct 59 Coordinator of Media Services Don Rogers and
Television Services staff in attendance. The meeting garnered positive results with all
parties interested in joining together to expand the important role MPTV provides in Mount
Prospect. District 59 Superintendent Robert T. Howard has approved the agreement.
The attached document is an agreement between the Village and School Distdct 59 to
provide funding to expand the current MPTV programming efforts to include District 59.
This document is similar to agreements the Village already has with the Mount Prospect
Park District, the Mount Prospect Public Library, School District 57 and School District 26.
As outlined in the document, Village abtivities would continue to receive top priority from
staff.
Attached please find a copy of the agreement for submittal to the-Village Board for
approval. Thank you for your consideration.
Ross Rowe
Cc: Maura Jandris, Public Information Officer
Patrick Seger, Human Resources Director
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MPTV - MOUNT PROSPECT GOVERNMENT TELEVISION
COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 59
LETTER OF AGREEMENT - TELEVISION PRODUCTION SERVICES
This document represents an agreement between the Village of Mount
Prospect (hereinafter referred to as "Village") and Community Consolidated
School District 59 (hereinafter referred to as "District 59") to participate in
programming and production activities for the Village's government access cable
television channel (hereinafter referred to as "MPTV") for a period beginning
September 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002. The agreement is as follows:
District 59 will contribute a total of $7,800;00 in funding assistance for television
production services coordinated by the Village's Community Producer and
supervised by the Village's Cable Production Coordinator based at MPTV for a
period beginning September l, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002. Three payment
in the amount of $2,600.00 will be made by District 59 to the Village for television
production services on the following dates: October 1, 2001; February 1, 2002;
and June 1, 2002.
Mount Prospect Government Television will perform the following functions:
1 ) The Community Producer will produce programming for District 59 to be
shown on MPTV on a regular basis under the supervision of the Village's
Cable Production Coordinator. The Community Producer will be considered
an employee of the Village and Village projects will be first priority of the
position.
2) A minimum of two (2) hours of original programming per month (September
2001 - June 2002) will be created; the subject of which shall be determined
by Distdct 59.
3) The Community Producer will meet with officials from District 5§ on a regular
basis to determine what types of programming are to be produced, and inform
the Village of these productions. Programming produced for Distdct 59 will be
scheduled by MPTV to balance with other programming as much as possible,
but Village programming will remain first priority. Videotaping of programs
will occur in all District 59 schools in Mount Prospect, Arlington Heights, Elk
Grove Village and Des Plaines. The selection of programming relevance or
scheduling shall be the sole responsibility of the Village.
4) The Community Producer will maintain and update information messages for
District 59 on MPTV's Community Information Guide and in the Cable Views
Village newsletter insert.
5) The Community Producer will coordinate volunteer efforts to produce the
District 59 programming.
6) District 59 will ask for volunteers to be trained by the Community Producer to
help increase the volunteer pool available to produce programming.
7) The Community Producer will provide, on a monthly basis, a report of all
production activities for the entities involved in this agreement including
number and length of programs produced, pre-production and post-
production hours, training of volunteers and interaction with Distdct 59 staff.
District 59 may approach and distribute programming produced under this
agreement to other cable television providers/local cable channels within its
coverage area. District 59 will inform MPTV of any distribution and provide
scheduled playback times.
If either party to this agreement becomes dissatisfied with the level of service
provided, the entity must put the specific grievance in writing and forward it to the
other party for review. Either party may withdraw from the agreement provided a
ninety (90) day written withdraw notice is forwarded to the other party prior to
withdrawal from the agreement
This agreement shall expire on June 30, 2002. All undersigned parties are
hereby committed for the length of the agreement, unless one or more parties
withdraws under the withdraw provisions of this agreement.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED
SCHOOL DISTRICT 59
By. By - -
Title Title
vwl
8/13/01
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TO ADOPT AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH
MOUNT PROSPECT SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 FOR
GOVERNMENT ACCESS CABLE TV SERVICE PRODUCTION
WHEREAS, the Mayor arid Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
(hereinafter referred to as_"the Village") have deemed that the best interests of the
Village may be served by entering into intergovernmental agreements; and
WHEREAS, Section 10 entitled "Intergovernmental Cooperation" of Article VII of the
Illinois Constitution empowers municipalities to enter into intergovernmental cooperation
agreements; and
WHEREAS, Mount Prospect School District 59 (hereinafter referred to as "District 59")
desires to participate in cable television production activities for the Village's government
access cable television channel for a period beginning September 1, 2001 and ending
July, 2002; and
WHEREAS, District 59 desires to contribute the necessary funding, as set forth in said
Agreement, to enable the cable television station owned by the Village of Mount
Prospect to compensate full-time personnel required to perform programming and
production activities representing each entity.
WHEREAS, said Agreement is a direct benefit to the Village of Mount Prospect and its
residents by providing extensive coverage of services, programs, and governmental
proceedings throughout the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECJ%~2bLOJA~ The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect are
hereby authorized to execute the Intergovernmental Agreement with District 59, attached
hereto and made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit "A.".
~: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effective from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001.
Gemld L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DONNA BROWN
DATE: AUGUST 14, 2001
SUBJECT: 2001 CDBG SIDEWALK PROGRAM
BACKGROUND
A sealed bid for the 2001 CDBG.-Sidewalk Program was publicly opened and read aloud on
August 14, 2001 at 10:00 A.M. A bid notice was posted in a local newspaper as required prior
to the opening.
The project consists of the installation of handicap accessible sidewalk ramps at all intersections
within the area south of Golf Road, between the eastern and western Village limits; and the
replacement of uneven sidewalk in the area north of Central Road, between Rand Road and the
eastern Village limits.
BIDS RESULTS
Two (2) Contractors received Contract Bid Documents, and one (1) submitted a bid. The bid
was $102,500.00 by G. & M., Inc. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $108,517.50.
The bid was checked, and no errors or discrepancies were found. The bidder submitted a Bid
Bond in the amount of 5% of the total bid as required by the Contract Documents. The bidder
correctly signed the bid and bid bond.
DISCUSSION
The bidder, G. & M., inc., successfully completed last year's 2000 Shared Cost Sidewalk
Program, and is currently under contract with the Village for this year's 2001 Sidewalk
Improvement Programs. Their work has been acceptable.
The 2001 CDBG Sidewalk Program combines funds available in two accounts: ADA
Compliance Project account and Sidewalk Repairs account. The budget for the ADA
Compliance Project is $50,000.00 and the Sidewalk Repairs is $50,000.00. The total budget for
the 2001 CDBG Sidewalk Program is $100,000.00.
Page 2
August 14, 2001
2001 CDBG Sidewalk Program
RECOMMENDATION
The Contractor's Bid is based on estimated quantities. The bid in the amount of $102,500.00
exceeds the total budget for the 2001 CDBG Sidewalk Program. The quantities will be reduced
to bring the contract in line with the budget for the project. We recommend the contract for the
2001 CDBG Sidewalk Program be awarded to the bidder, G. & M., Inc., in an amount not to
exceed $100,000.00 to cover the full amount budgeted for the two programs.
Funding for this project is under the following Account Code Numbers:
0702306-640009, page 145; ADA Compliance Project ($50,000.00)
0702306-690010, page 145; Sidewalk Repairs ($50,000.00)
Donna M. Brown
I concur with the above recommendation.
~ Glen-R Andle/
Director of Public Works
X:\FILES\ENGINEER\PROJECTS\SIDEWALK~001\CDBG\Recommend.doc
2001 Handicap Ramp Target. Area
2001 HaZard Elimination Target. Area
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM t'r~ cm~ u~a
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: AUGUST 17, 2001
SUBJECT: TRAIN DEPOT PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
AND STREETSCAPE STAGE II BID RESULTS
BACKGROUND
In conjunction with the doWntown redevelopment projects, V3 Consultants, formerly SDI Con-
sultants, was retained by the Village to design improvemems to the Train Depot Parking Lots
and Stage II of the Streetscape Program. The project design plans and specifications have been
completed and aplSrcrved by the Illiri0is Department o£ Transportation (IDOT), and bids were re-
ceived by IDOT on August 3, 2001.
The proposed improvemems are necessitated by the need for improved safety at the rail crossing
of IL Rte 83 at the Metra/Unon Pacific Railroad, improved kiss 'n ride access, and improved per
destrian access to the train station and the downtown area in general. In addition, the existing lot
surface of all three existing parking lots is in need of maintenance repairs. The proposed im-
provements provide safety at the IL Rte 83 rail crossing by eliminating the right turn into the
commuter parking lot. This will eliminate the potential for vehicle queues across the rail cross-
ing and minimize the conflicting movements along IL Rte 83 near the rail crossing. The center
parking lot has been reconfigured to provide an enhanced pedestrian circulation. Pedestrian ac-
cess is also enhanced in the east lot by providing increased access to the train platform and adja-
cent sidewalks. Improved parking fee collection facilities and streetscape landscaping, similar to
the fi~st stage, are also proposed to ~nhance the user efficiency and aesthetics of the area~ A map
depicting the location of the improvements is attached.
BID RESULTS
Attached is V3 Consultants' detailed review of the bid results. Even though there was only one
bidder and that bid was 6% over their engineer's estimate, it is V3's opinion that the bid is rea-
sonable and in line based on other similar projects recently bid. V3 has met with Martam Con-
struction and was able to reduce their bid by approximately $107,000. They were also successful
Memo to Village Manager
Re: Train Depot Parking Lot Improvements
And Streetscape Stage Il Bid Results
August 17, 2001
Page two
in getting the Illinois Department of Transportation to increase their grant from $400,000 to
$703,000. By applying these two cost reductions to the overall project cost, along with the other
~grants and Norwood Builders' contributions, the Village's net cost will be $642,472.90. See V3
Consultants' letter for the detailed breakdown.
RECOMMENDATION
Both The Director of Community Development and I have reviewed V3 Consultants' bid analy-
sis and agree with their recommendation to accept Martam Constmction's bid.
Therefore, I recommend the Village Board authorize IDOT to accept Martam Construction's bid
in the amount of $1,498,472.90. I further recommend the Village Board authorize the Mayor to
sign Change Order #1 in the amount of approximately ($107,000) and the IDOT joint agreement
amendment when we receive them from IDOT. The joint agreement amendment will reflect the
additional $303,000 grant and a revised total project amount based on Martam's bid.
The Village's funding for this proposed expenditure can be found in the 2001 budget under the
Parking Fund. Account Number 6305111-690103, $200,0013, page 218, and Downtown Street-
scape, Account. Number 5507703-690200, $445,000, page 290.
GKA/td
attach.
c: Director of Community Development William Cooney
Deputy Director of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey
Village Engineer Jeff Wulbecker
X:kFILESh~RONTOF F~P~dLROA D\D E POT PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS & STREETSCAPE STAGE II BID RESULT~I~C
Services, Ltd.
August 16, 2001
Mr. Glen Andler
Director of Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount ProspecL linois 60056-2229
Re: Village of Mount Prospect
Train Depot Parking lot Rehabilitation/Resurfacing Project
Streetscape Stage II
Dear Mr. Andler:
The Village's Train Depot Parking lot Rehabilitation/Resurfacing and Streetscape bid was
opened at the Illinois Department of Transportation's office at 2100 Dirksen Parkway in
Springfield, on August 3, 2001 (see attached Exhibit A for illustration of areas and scope of
work). Only one bid, from Martam Construction, was received and read aloud. The bid amount
is one million, four hundred ninety-eight thousand four hundred and seventy-two dollars and
ninety cents ($1,498,472.90).
We evaluated the bid prepared by Martam Construction for the.referenc, ed project and have
found their bid of $1,498,472.90 to be correct. Martam's bid is 6.24% over the Engineers
Opinion of Probable Cost (EOPC) of $1,410,485.15 for this project.
We have also reviewed the contractor's qualification, backlog and schedule of other work, the
qualifications of their subcontractor, and their performance on similar projects, and found their
qualifications to be satisfactory and we take no exception to their ability to perform the subject
work. Two of their recently complete projects involving similar construction include the first
stage of the Streetscape improvements near Northwest Highway and Central Road and the first
stage of the Welter Creek project.
Although only one contractor responded to the call for bids, the bid is reasonably close to the
EOPC. Had there been a second bidder, it would have been within the tllinois Department of
Transportation's (IDOT's) allowable tolerance for acceptance of 10% over the EOPC. The bid
unit costs'appear to be reasonable based on the review of the individual items, comp_ar_ison with
other recently bid projects, and knowledge of the current contracting conditions.
IDOT's policy provides that the Village has the option to reject the bid and re-bid the project at a
later date since there was only one bid and the bid exceeds the EOPC. Although a spring start
to construction may entice additional bidders to submit on the project, recent experience on
other similar projects has proven that, due to the current conditions in the construction market,
prices may continue to escalate and it is likely that the bids received at a later date would not be
more competitive than Martam's current bid. In addition to the potential for cost escalation, the
additional funding that has been committed by the Department of Public Transportation in the
form of an Operation Green Light grant (an additional $303,000) may not be available to this
project if the bid is not accepted by October.
E:~000\00027~Admin\00027.092 bid recomendation letter.doc
Services, Ltd.
Mr. Glen Andler
Village of Mount Prospect
August 15, 2000
Page 2
Total Proiect Costs
In addition to the construction cost for the items in Martam's bid, there wi be two additional
costs that must be factored into the overall cost for the areject:
o Lighting and Electrical $262,000 (Engineers Opinion of Probable Const. Cost)
o Construction Engineering $ 75,000 (Remaining Budget of V31S's current
contract [$55,000) plus $20,000 in
supplemental services)
With these costs, the total cost for the project comes to $1.835.472.90.
Potential Cost Reductions
In an effort to reduce the cost of the project, a value engineering review of the proposed
construction has been performed by bur staff. This review has yielded suggestions that will
yield savings of approximately $107,000 from the bid amount. The suggested changes include:
o Changing the method of pave.menu removal
o Allowing the use of recycle aspt-ialt for sidewalk base course
c Reduction of the amount of curb & gutter removal and replacement
o Alternate method of the pavement rehabilitation
o Substitution of plant materials
These cost reductions, which will be realized by issuing a Change Order shortly after
acceptance of the bid and approval of the Construction Contracts, will reduce the cost of the
contract with Martam from $1,498,472.90 to $1,391,472.90 and the total project, cost from
$1,835,472.90 to $1,728,472.90.
Proiect Funding
The funding for the project will come from the following sources:
Funding Source Amount
Operation Green Light (OGL) (Approved Grant) $ 400,000.00 - -
OGL (Additional Funds Committed) $ 303,000.00
Legislative Add On (LAO) $ 130,000.00
Surface Transportation Funding (STP) $ 133,000.00
Illinois First Grant (Pine Street Park) $ 20,000.00
Norwood Builder (for private property work) $ 100,000.00
Village Parking Fund $ 200,000.00
Village TIF $ 442,472.90
Total Funding $ 1,728,472.90
E:~000\00027~dmint00027.092 bid recomendetion letter.doc
I JS Infrastructure
Services, Ltd.
Mr, Glen Andler
Village of Mount Prospect
August 15, 2000
Page 3
Project Schedule
Based on a board approval of August 21, 2001 we anticipate beginning construction by mid-
September and completing ali of the hardscape construction by December 1, 2001.
Landscaping is anticipated to begin in March of 2002 and be completed by May 2002.
In an effort to reduce the ~mpact to commuter parking, the initial focus of the work will be the'
Train Depot Block since this area will require complete reconstruction and reconfiguration and
therefore, the longest schedule for completiork This reconstruction wil] also require the
relocation of the handicapped parking to the east and west lots resulting in the loss of
approximately 15 parking spaces. The reconfiguration of the entrances and exits to the east
-and west lots will also be performed early in the project. This will minimize the impact to
commuter parking ant help ensure that the center lot will be repaved prior to the end of the
construction season.
Upon beginning the paving work for the Train Depot Block, the focus will shift to removing and
replacing the asphalt t~avement in the east and west lots. Our staff will endeavor to work with
the contractor' to develop a paving scheme that. will minimize the loss of parking during-these
operations by encouraging short term closures of one lot at a time and Weekend work.
The work at the Pine Street park and along the north side of Northwest Highway will be able to
proceed along a separate timeline since much of this work will not involve the same
subcontractors as the work in the parking lots south of Northwest Highway.
Based on the afore mentioned issues we believe it is in the best interest of the Village to
authorize IDOT to accept Martam's bid in the amount of $1,498.472.90. We further recommend
that the Village proceed with the subsequent approval of Change Order #1 in the amount of
approximatelY ($107,000) based on the previously noted potential cost reductions.
If you have any questions, please call me at (847) 870-5640.
Sincerely, _ _
V3 Infrastructure Services, Ltd.
Director of Operations
GJS/gjs
cc: file 00027
Jeff Wulbecker-VOMP, Public Works
Bill Cooney - VOMP, Community Development
E:~000\000~Z~,dmin\00027.092 bid recomendation le~ter.doc
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER '~/J~b, ~'~
.. FROM: DIRECTOROF FI.NANCE C. ~1~'~O~
DATE: JULY 30, 2001
SUBJECT: VILLAGE HALL FINANCING
PURPOSE: To present a recommendation the Village proceed with the issuance of $10 million
of general obligation bonds to fund a portion of the cost of construction of a new village
hall/community center and multi-level parking structure. Also being presented are the proposals
from R.V. Norene and Associates and Katten, Muchin & Zavis to serve as financial advisor and
bond counsel.
BACKGROUND: On July 24, 2001 the Board of Trustaes meeting as a Committee of the Whole
indicated their support of issuing bonds in the approximate amount of $13.4 million to fund a new
village hall/community center and multi-level parking structure.
DISCUSSION: With the Village expecting to issue approximately $13.4 million in general
obligation bonds to fund the construction of a new village hall/community center and multi-level
parking structure there is some medt to issuing $10 million before the end of 2001 and the
balance in early 2002.
The complicated federal tax laws covering the issuance of tax-exempt muni(~pal bonds contain
preferential tax treatment for banks that purchase municipal bonds from issuers which issue
bonds in the aggregate amount of $10 million or less in any calendar year. These bonds are
referred to as "bank qualified". Because of the tax savings banks can realize, the net interest
rate paid by municipalities on bank qualified bonds are usually 20 basis points (0.2%) tess than
non-bank qualified bonds.
By breaking out its planned .financing into two separate bond issues, the Village can market and
sell up to $10 million in bank qualified general obligation bonds in 2001 since it has not issued
any debt yet this calendar year. The saving of 20 basis points equates to approximately $17,000
per year in lower interest costs. If the Village were to issue the full $13.4 million in bonds in
either 2001 or 2002 the bonds would not be bank qualified because the total debt issued exceeds
$10 million.
illage Hall Financing
July 30, 2001
Page 2
If the Village does issue $10 million before the end of 2001, the balance of our financing needs
can be raised in early 2002. By then, the Village should have a much better handle on the
projected costs of the new facilities. The second bond issue can be sized upwards or
downwards at that time. If the total debt issued by the Village in 2002 is less than $10 million,
the second bond issue can be marketed and sold as bank qualified bonds as well.
Once the decision is made to .prOceed with the financing plan, the Village Board needs to appoint
both bond counsel and financial advisor for the two proposed bond issues. Attached are
proposals submitted by R.V. Norene and Associates to serve as bond counsel and Katten,
Muchin & Zavis to serve as bond counsel. These firms have represented the Village on its bond
issues for at least the past twenty years. Both firms provide quality services, and their fees are
competitive.
RECOMMENDATION:
If the Village Board has come to the decision that it does intend on constructing a new village
hall/community center and parking structure, it is recommended the Board:
1) Authorize staff to proceed with the solicitation of bids for the sale of $10 million general
obligation bonds to fund a portion of the construction costs of a new village hall and parking
structure.
2) Authorize the Village President to sign the professional service agreement with R.V. Norene
and Associates to serve as financial advisor.
3) Accept the proposal submitted by Katten, Muchin & Zavi to serve as bond counsel on the
village hall financings.. ~t~ ~__~"~
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Dre/dre
I:\Corresp\lntl~.001~Village Hall~Financing 7;30.doc
R.V. NORENE & Associates, Inc.
July 31, 2001
President and Board of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect
Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
· ' Ladles and Gentlemen:
We understand that you propose t° issue bonds over the next two years to pay the cost of a
variety of capital improvements including public buildings. Having serVed as the Village's financial
advisor for all of the Village's bOnd issues since 1980 (19 issues par value $55,724,270 including tax
exempt and taxable and tax increment, spec al serVice area and general obligation bonds), we are
pleased to once again offer our financial advisory services to establish the financing program and
successfully market and deliver the necessary bonds. An outline of the steps we feel will be
necessary in connection with each sale follows but, in any event, our services will be complete and
co will be designed to reduce the financing costs of the project and to enhance the Village's standing in
~ the financial community.
~ 1. We will immediately familiarize ourselves with the project through meetings with your
z staff and your attorneys and based thereon establish a tentative financing timetable so
o that close coordination will be ensured in the legal and financial aspects of the
~u
~ financing,
,-;- 2. We will submit estimates to you of the annual debt service cost and will make
~_ recommendations regard!rig the financial plan including traditional financing vehicles
m~ (bank qualified and non bank qualified, tax-exempt and/or taxable) and, where
a. applicable,'the use of bond anticipation financing, variable rate bonds, etc. These
~ recommendations will be based our review of the projected revenues available
upon
- for debt service, your.existing indebtedness and their authorizing ordinances, your
~ future bonding needs and the municipal bond market.
3. We will submit recommended debt retirement schedules for your approval. Based
upon the agreed upon financing plan, we wilt meet with civic groups as you request to
explain the financing impact. _ _
4. We will review the existing reports of your other consultants and, where applicable,
make recommendations regarding changes therein to ensure financial feasibility.
5. We will sPeCify financial provisions including prior redemption rights, the flow of funds,
and the issuance of additional debt, to be included in the legal proceedings for a most
attractive and successful financing. These provisions will be designed to assure the
Village of its ability to complete the financing of all of its future needs.
6. We will research the financial information and economic data bearing upon you as an
issuer and the successful marketing of the bonds and will assemble same, together
with the detailS of the bonds, into an attractive Official Statement which will allow you to
satisfy the market's current requirements for full disclosure. The Official Statement will
be Submitted to you for approval prior to its distribution in "Preliminary" form as
required under SEC Rule 15c2-12.
Lake & Waukegan Office Center, Suite 215 o 1701 Lake Avenue · Glenview, IL 60025
847-998-9848 · FAX 847-998-5503
R.V. NORENE & Associates, inc.
7. We will advise you of the marketing procedures and specifically recommend the time,
place and method of conducting the bid opening and sale of the bonds.
8. When a bond bid opening date has been established, we wilh
a. arrange for the publication of the notice(s) of sale in the national financial
press.
b. · make a recommendation relative to the advisability of obtaining an
investment rating and, if you elect to request one, we shall make
application on your behalf including preparation of the necessary
information. We will recommend whether a personal Village presentation
should be made to the rating agency(les) in New York City.
c. recommend whether you should make application for municipal bond
insurance and, if it is decided to make such application, we shall submit
the necessary information,
d. distribute the Official Statement to a broad list of prospective bidders,
investment advisors and investing institutions.
e. insert the Official Statement on our web page and publish a summary
notice of sale in the financial press to alert potential retail customers,
including Village residents, as to how to obtain information regarding the
bond sale.
f. insert the Official Statement on Bloomberg accessing over 20,000
screens of bond market prefessionals on both the buy and sell sides.
e. solicit additional bidders by contacting prospective bidders in advance of
the sale to ensure that there ara no unanswered questions regarding the
issue.
9. We will attend the bid opening where we will conduct the sale, check the bids for
accuracy and advise you of the acceptability of the best bid received.
10. We will assist in and coordinate all details leading up to the delivery of the bonds,
including the preparation of the FinaJ Official Statement under SEC Rule 15c2-12,
printing of the bonds and calculating the amount due at delivery.
11. Upon completion of the delivery of your bonds, we will compute a record of payments
of principal and interest and provide you with a convenient reference summary of the
financing.
12. During the term of this Agreement, we will annually advise the Village of its Continuing
Disclosure obligations and prepare the updated Financial Informatkon for submission
to the then applicable Nationally Recognized Municipal Securities Information
Repositories. If there is a bond sale during the annual ped0d for which the update is
filed we will waive our $1,200 annual fee for the updated information.
We shall have no interest in the purchase or resale of your obligations nor shall we engage in
any other activity which may constitute a conflict of interest with performance of our services for you.
We will not obligate you for any expenses except with your approval.
You will be responsible for the fees of your attorneys, bond counsel, engineers/
architects/planners and are to pay all of your ordinary expenses including advertising, printing and
distribution of Official Statements, the purchase (if applicable) of a rating of the bonds, the purchase
(if applicable) of municipal bond insurance, bond registradpaying agent fees and the printing and
delivery of the bonds. We will assist you by arranging for the advertisement of the sale in the national
financial press and; where applicable, will obtain competitive bids on the necessary printing.
R.V. NORENE & Associates, Inc,
For our services we are to be paid a fee which shall include our own ordinary expenses, our
necessary travel expenses between Mount ProspectJGlenview/Chicago and our services in full
which, in addition to those outlined in this Agreement, shall include all necessary and usual functions
to complete each i'inancing. In the event it is deemed necessary to travel to New York in connection
with the Village's application for an investment rating, we are to be reimbursed for our out-of-pocket
expenses and travel costs.
Our fee is to be based upon the par amount of the bonds delivered at each sale and
calculated as follows: A m~nimum fee for each bond sale of $5,000 plus $2.25 per $1,000 par
amount for all bonds deliverad in excess of $1,000,000. Our fee is to be due at the time of the award
of the Iow bond bid and payable upon receipt of the proceeds of this issue. If for any reason no bond
award is mad6 no fee is due.
This Agreement shall be for aterm of three years from the date of this acceptance by the
Village and shall include all bonds sold during its term. The Village is given the option of extending
the term hereof to any financing that occurs within 24 months of the end of the term. The Village is
also given the option of canceling this Agreement at any time dudng its term given 90 days written
notice of the applicable Board action.
Respectfully submitted,
President
R. V. Norene & Associates, Inc.
RVN/vim
The above proposal accepted this day 2001.
You are instructed to proceed.
Attest: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, iLLINOIS
Village Clerk Village President
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2001
Tentative Financina Timetable
Tuesday, August 7, 2001 . ~ Village Board approve proceeding with bond sale. Staff
announce Tuesday, October 2, 2001 as the tentative sale date.
Wednesday, September 5, 2001 R.V. Norene & Associates, lnc, (RVN&A) mall news release regarding Tuesday,
October 2, 2001 bid Qpening.
Fax text to Bond Buyer for "New on Calendar' and "Sealed Bids" .for Monday,
September 10, 2001 edition. RVN&A rnaJl text of Summary Notice of Sale to Wall
Street Journal for publication on Monday, September 24, 2001.
RVN&A fax Notice of Sale to SURE BiD for bid guarantee structure.
- RVN&A fax matudty schedule and bond details to Bond Counsel for preparation of
Bond Ordinance.
Wednesday, september 12, 2001 - RVN&A fax/deliver.draft of Official Statement, Official Notice of Sale/Bid Form to
Village and Bond Counsel for review and telephone comment by Noon, Monday,
September 17, 2001.
Thursday, September 13, 2001 - Bond Counsel provide Village with draff Bond Ordinance for inclusion in Board
packets for September 18, 2001 Board Meeting.
Monday, September 17, 2001 Village telephone RVN&A with comments on Official Statement. RVN&A provide
camera ready text of Official Statement, Official Notice of Sale/Bid Form to pdnter.
RVN&A mail all information to Moody's for investment rating.
RVN&A fax to CUSIP Bureau for CUSIP number assignment to maturities,
Tuesday, September 18, 2001 - RVN&A mail (first mailing) pdnted Official Statement, Officia[ Notice of Sa[e/Bid Form
to dealer banks and investment bankers/underwriters.
RVN&A provide disk to FCI Solutions for insertion of the Official Statement on the
B[oomberg System (over 20,000 screens for underwriter types and institutional
final investors).
- RVN&A add Preliminary Official statement on homepage (www.rvnorene-assoc-
inc.com).
Board ~ introduce Bond Ordinance.
Monday, September 24, 2001 - RVN&A publish Summary Notice of Sale in Chicago-edition of the Wall Street
Journal - - this advertisement tells individual investor-s how to obtain the Official
Statement which will be available on the internet at www.rvnorene-assoc-inc.com.
Tuesday, September 25, 2001 RVN&A rn~l (second mailing) to investing 'institutions and investment advisors
-~ throughout the United States.
Tuesday, October2, 2001 - Bond Bid Opening at 11:00 A.M., C.D.T., at the offices of R.V. Norene &
Associates, Inc., 1701 Lake Avenue, Suite 215, Glenview, Illinois.
Bond Counset e-mail final Bond Ordinance to Village.
. ~ Bond sale award and adoption of Bond Ordinance.
Wednesday, October 3, 2001 Depository notified regarding global book entry.
Draft "Final Official Statement" faxed to purchaser, Bond Counsel and insurer (if
applicable} for approval on October 5, 2001.
Cdday, October 5, 2001 - RVN&A complete "Final" Official Statement and provide copies to purchaser for
distribution to investors (within SEC required seven business days of the bond
sale).
Tuesday, October 23, 2001 Deliver Bonds to purchaser and receive proceeds.
(Board meetings 1st and 3rd Tuesdays)
r. Douglas Ellsworm
Finan~ Dke~tor. .. -.
Village of Mount Prospect
Village Hall '
i00 South Emerson Street
· Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056.
Re VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
Dear Doug:
We understand that the Village expects to finance a new Village Hall a~d parking deck by the
issuance orS10,000,000 principal amount 0fgeu~ral'obligali6n bonds in'2001 and apprOXimat~Iy
$3,400,000 principal amount Of general obligatip~ l~ond.q in'2002.
Our fee for thc $10,000,000 issue Ls $15,000. Our fee for the $3,400,000 issue is $8,400.
If you have any questions concerai~g the~e (ee quotes, please feel free ~o coumet me.
Very truly you~s~
LG/be
Enclosure
MAYOR ~
Gerald L~ Farley
VILLAGE MANAGER
TRUSTEI~ Michael E. Janonis
Timothy J. Corcoran
P lwm. c Village of Mount Prospect ' L ECLERK
Richard M. Lohrstoffer Velma W. Low~
Michaele , .a W.K.W. Skow . Community Development Department Pho.e: 847/818-5328
Fax: 847/818-5329
Michael gL Zadel 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TOD: 847/392.6064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
Senior Center Thursday
50 South Emerson Street August 23,2001
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 7:30 p.m.
L CALL TO ORDER ~
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of July 26, 2001
1. ZBA-17-01 / 305 Douglas Avenue / Craig Residence
2. ZBA-18-01 / 125 Horuer Lane / MeMahon Residence
3. ZBA-19-01 / 350 WeGo Trail / D'Aequisto Residence
4. ZBA-20-01 / 202 N. Prospect Manor / Miller Residence
5. ZBA-21-01 / 1001 S. Basse Road / Dunkin Donuts-Baskin Robbins
6. ZBA-22-01 / 1004 Callero Circle / Krueger Residence
7. ZBA-23SR-01 / 824 E. Rand Road / Brunswick Zone
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA-21-01 / 1001 S. Busse / Dunkin Donuts-Baskin Robbins / Conditional Use (drive-thru &
Variations; NOTE: This case is Village Board final.
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA-24-01 / 1778 Cree Lane / Mazur Residence / Conditional Use to install a circular drive. NOTE:
This case is Village Board final.
B.ZBA-25-01/212 Audrey Court / Raueci Residence / Variation (Privacy Fence).
NOTE: This case is Zoning Board final.
C. ZBA-26-01 / 20 S. Main Street / Norwood Builders / Amend Conditional Use for a Planned Unit
Development. NOTE: This case is Village Board final. (Continued to September Meeting)
VI. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but begause Qf a disability needs some accommodation to
participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056,
847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-17-2001 Hearing Date: July 26, 2001
PETrrlONER: Donald Craig, for the property at:
305 Douglas Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE: July 1 I, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQLrEST: Conditional Use to allow a circular drive
IVIEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMEERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Ju.dy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Donald Craig
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes oftbe June 28, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0; Merrill Cotton and Keith Youngquist were not at the June meeting. Chairperson Arlene Juracek
introduced Case No. ZBA-17-01, a request for a Conditional Use to allow a circular drive at 305 Douglas Avenue.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the subiect
property is an interior lot located across the street from Carefree Park. The property owners are in the proees~ of
building a new home and combining two lots to make one lot of record. Currently the subject tot measures 115'
frontage by 125.5' depth. Ms. Connolly said that when the subdivision process is complete, the lot will measure
229.99' frontage by 125.25' depth and the petitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval to install a circular drive.
Ms. Connolly explained that the proposed circular drive would be located only on the current 305 Douglas Avenue.
The standard and circular driveways measure a total of 1,866 square feet and cover 54% of the front yard. Although
.... the-site would comply with lot coverage requirements, the circular drive and standard dr. ix,e_w~ulat occupy more than
half of the current front yard and would not be in keeping with the Village's policy o~:-maintaining an open, green,
front yard.
Ms. Connolly said that the proposed driveways and curb cuts would be consistent for two lots of record. As the
petitioner is in the process of doubling the size of th~ property and subsequently the front yard, via the plat of
rasubdivision, the circular and standard driveways would occupy 27% of the front yard and would be in keeping with
Village policy.
Ms. Connolly said the property was originally part of a four-lot subdivision recorded in 1998. As part of the 1998
subdivision, the petitioner was required to meet all Village coc~es. Despite several discussioas with the Arlington
Heights Park District to obtain property along the west side of Douglas for the required 66-foot right-of-way width,
Douglas Avenue, north of Lincoln Street and south of White Oak Street, was not improved as required by Mount
Prospect code and has a substandard right-of-way and street pavement width.
Ms. Connolly said that the petitioner states that a circular drive is necessary to provide adequate guest parking since
Douglas Avenue has parking on one side of the street only. In addition, the petitioner states that having guests park in
the circular drive will not adversely affect public safety and welfare. Also, the circular drive will be constructed from
brick pavers and be aesthetically pleasing.
Ms. Connollv ret~otled that. in order to a~nrove the Conditional llsa the ren,}ect h:~ tr~ .... , *1,~ ~'~,,,Ai*;r,,,:,I l leo
Zoning Board of Appeals
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ZBA~ 17-2001
Page 2
of survey, site plan, traffic patterns in the neighborhood, and visited the site. She said that traffic data was not
available because the subject property is under construction, Douglas Avenue is partially closed because of the
construction, and there is only one other house on the block. Ms. Coanolly noted that, during the 1998 Plan
Commission public hearing meetings, staff was informed that people have historically parked on Douglas Avenue
when their children played at Carefree Park and that Douglas Avenue would be difficult to navigate during ballgames
because the street would be so congested.
Ms. Connolly said that since Douglas Avenue was constructed according to current codes, the circular drive would not
.have an adverse impact to the existing drainage system beeanse it uses storm sewers. She said that the petitioner
proposes to use brick pavers to construct the circular drive and that the larger lot frontage would be in keeping with the
· - Village's policy of maintaining a "green" front yard. Therefore, the circular driveway would not have a negative
impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets, and that the essential character of the neighborhood
would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare.
Ms. Connolly said that the proposed circular driveway meets the Conditional Use standards listed in the Zoning
Ordinance. Therefore, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a
Conditional Use for a circular driveway at 305 Douglas Street, with the condition that the petitioner complete the
subdivision process that consolidates two lots of record to one lot, which is scheduled to go to Village Board August
7~, and that the circular portion of the d;iv'~way be removed if the lot is later subdivided and the frontage measures less
than 150-feet.
Hal Ettinger asked Ms. Connolly when the street would be opened. She responded that it would open when
oonstruction of the second house was complete.
Ms. Juracek asked if the petitioner was present to address the group.
Donald Craig, 1040 Arbor Court in Mount Prospect, was sworn in. He agreed with Ms. Connolly's assessment of the
petition. Ms. Juraeek said she thought this was a straightforward request and this was an attractive corner, Lincoln and
Douglas. She asked if he understood that the conditions imposed by staff. Mr. craig said he did.
At 7:43, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members. Mr.
Ettinger asked for clarification of the second oondition imposed by staff. Ms. Juraeek explained that the circular drive
would need to be removed from 305 Douglas if the lots were ever divided again in a manner that would create a
frontage that measured less than two lots in the R1 zoning district.
Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve the request for a Conditional Use to
allow a circular drive at 305 Douglas Street, Case No. ZBA-17-0 l, subject to the two conditions imposed by staff and
the additional condition that the 'driveway be done in paver b'ricks, not asphalt Or concrete. Hal Ettinger seconded the
motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros, Ettinger, Rogers, Youngquist and Juracek
NAYS:
Motion was approved 6-0.
At I0:00 p.m., after the Zoning Board heard five more cases and tabled Case No. ZBA-21-01 to the August 23~d
meeting, Merrill Cotten made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Hal Ettinger. The motion was approved by a voice
vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Fu<lycO 7 y,S niorPlanner ~
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-18-2001 Hearing Date: July 26, 2001
PEITI1ONERS: Jeff and Janet McMahon
125 Homer
PUBLICATION DATE: July 11, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Variation to allow construction of a 5'4"x21'5" enclosed addition in the side
setback
1VIEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy-Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Jeff and Janet McMahon
Kevin Kopterski
William Skwarski
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes of the June 28, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0; Merrill Cotton and Keith Youngquist were not at the June meeting. At 7:47, Chairperson Arlene Juracek
introduced Case No. ZBA-18-01, a request for a Variation to allow construction of a 5'4"x21'5" enclosed addition in the
side setback. .
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the subject
residence is on a comer lot on a single-family residential street. The applicant proposes to censtmct an addition along the
north lot line (interior side yard). In order to comply with Zoning Code regulations, the interior side yard would have to
be no less than 7.5-feet. The petitioner proposes a 5.67-foot setback and is seeking a Variation to expand the house 1.83-
feet into the required setback.
Ms. Connolly explained that the addition will be constructed from face brick and the floor plans show that the addition
would increase the size of the existing kitchen. The petitioner states that he has explored other ways to expand the house
to maximize the family's living space, but could not arrive at a design that was practical and met Village code
requirements. In addition, the petitioner states that the neighbors adjacent to the area do not object to the addition, that the
addition would enhance the neighborhood, and that the addition would not adversely impact light or ventilation for the
adjacent neighbors' property.
Ms. Connolly said that staffreviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan, visited the site, and found that the size,
shape, and development of the subject property are typical of most residential properties in the Village, but the location of
the house in relation to the lot is not typical of most homes with two exterior yards. The entrance to the house is located
in the exterior side yard and measures 30-feet from Emmerson Lane while the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot
setback. She said that most homes are built up to or are closer to the minimum setback requirement. In this case, if the
house was located 10-feet closer to Emmerson Lane the Variation would not be required and the petitioner could build the
addition as proposed and comply with zoning setback regulations.
Ms. Connolly said that, in order to approve a Variation, the request has to meet the standards listed in the Zoning
Ordinance. The standards relate to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property
not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
Zoning Board of Appeals
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ZBA- 18-01
Page 2
Ms Connolly explained that, although the petitioner is creating his own hardship by expanding the house into the required
setback, the location of the house is a unique physical condition of the subject property. In addition, the proposed
structure would not be likely to have a negative effect on the character of the neighborhood or the public welfare.
Ms. Connolly pointed out that the proposed variation would not have a detrimental effect on neighborhood character and
the location of the house supports a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards listed in the Zoning
Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA approve the proposed Variation to permit an
enclosed structure to encroach 1'I0" (1.83') into the required 7.5-foot side yard setback for the residence at 125 Homer
Lane, Case No. ZBA-18-01. The Zoning Board's decision is final for this case.
Jeff & Janet McMahon were sworn in. Mr. McMahon explained that, since the children are growing, they require more
· eating space and this proposed addition ~;as the only way to expand.
Richard Rogers suggested they could put the addition to the east but Mr. McMahon said that would give them a very
elongated kitchen and not a workable space.
Hal Ettinger said he did not agree with that assessment and that the proposed addition would encroach into the north
neighbor's space, leaving a 5-foot separation between houses. Mr. McMahon said that area was the neighbor's garage and
just a blank wall.
Kevin Kopterski of Schaumburg was swo-m'~in and said that he was the architect for the project. He explained that an
expansion to the east would leave only two feet space to walk through. He said the proposed addition would only
encroach only 1.83' into the setback and would not have a negative effect on the neighbor's property or the neighborhood.
Arlene Juracek said they had read the letters of support from the neighbors and asked if anyone in the audience wished to
address the group.
William Skwarski, 1414 E. Emerson Lane, was sworn in and testified he was the neighbor to the east who would be
affected by the addition. He said that he had been a carpenter for sixty years and that he and other neighbors were in favor
of this addition. He said that the neighbors to the north had planned to attend the meeting tonight to lend their support to
this case; but there had been an emergency in the area and they were unable to come to the meeting.
At 7:58, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members. Mr.
Ettinger said he was against the addition and that it was too close to the neighbor's house· Mr. Rogers reminded him that
the neighbor to the east had testified in favor of the addition and that neighbors to the north and east submitted letters
supporting the requested Variation.
Ms. Juracek summed up the discussion, saying she thought this Variation, which would l~e a practical solution to the
petitioner's need for more kitchen space, avoided changing the plumbing, had the neighbor's support, and was needed
because the house was set 30-feet from the exterior lot line when code required a 20-foot setback.
Leo Floros moved to approve the request for a Variation to allow construction of a 5'4"x21 '5" enclosed addition in the
side setback at 125 Homer Street, Case No. ZBA- 18-01. Richard Rogers seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros, Rogers, Youngquist and Juracek
NAYS: Ettinger,
Motion was approved 5-1.
At 10:00 p.m., after the Zoning Board heard four more cases and tabled Case No. ZBA-21-01 to the August 23~d meeting,
Merrill Cotten made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Hal Ettinger. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the
meeting was adjourned.
Barba~ Swiatek, Pl~anning Secretary
~[udy Conr/o'[l~, Senior Planner x~
MINUTES OF TI~ REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-19-2001 Hearing Date: July 26, 2001
PETITIONER: Kelly & John D'Acquisto
PUBLICATION DATE: Suly 11, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Variation to allow construction of a garage in the rear setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: . Hal Ettinger
Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Kelly & John D'Aequisto
Henry W. Youngquist
Tony Andrews
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes of the June 28, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0; Merrill Cotton and Keith Youngquist were not at the June meeting. At 8:01 p.m., after hearing two
cases, Ms. Arlene Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-19-01, a request for a Variation to allow construction of a garage
in the rear setback.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the subject
property is an existing home with an attached garage located on a comer lot. Per the Zoning Ordinance, the front of
· the lot is along Lincoln Street and the exterior side yard is on WeGo even though the main entrance to the house is
from WeGo Trail.
Ms. Connolly said the petitioners would like to convert the existing attached garage into living space and construct a
new attached garage directly in front of it, maintaining the existing 13' 1 I" rear setback and explained that current code
requires a 25-foot setback. The petitioners are seeking a variation to construct a new, attached garage that has a 13' 11"
rear setback.
Ms. Connolly reported that, in order to approve the Variation, the request has to meet the seven standards listed in the
Zoning Ordinance and said the standards relate to: the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a
specific property not generally applicable to other properties; not created by any person presently having an interest in
the property; a lack of desire to increase financial gain; and protection of the public welfare, other property, and
neighborhood character.
Ms. Connolly reported that staffreviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. The subject
parcel is an 11,375 square foot rectangular parcel that is out of any flood zone. The parcel is developed with a single
family home and an attached garage. She said the existing rear setback does not comply with current code
requirements, but is consistent with the rear setback of the property north of the subject property, which has a 16' 10"
rear setback. The proposed attached garage is not different from what is located on the adjacent lot, but it would alter
the view for the adjacent property. In addition, the petitioners state in their application that the appearance of the
house and character of the neighborhood would be adversely impacted if the new garage met the 25-foot rear setback.
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA- 19-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Ms. Connolly explained that the petitioners' reasons for the proposed variation relate to the house being on a comer lot
and maintaining the current look and character of the house. However, the standards for a variation are based on
physical characteristics of the property and the impact of the variation on the adjacent properties and the neighborhood.
The lot and house are typical of other properties in the Village and the garage could be built according to current
Zoning requirements. Locating the attached garage 13.83:feet from the rear lot line would not be likely to have a
negative effect on the character of the neighborhood or the public welfare, but the request fails to meet the standards
for a Variation as required by the Zoning Ordinance. While the proposed variation may be consistent with conditions
of other properties in this neighborhood and not have a detrimental effect on neighborhood character, the submittal
fails to support a finding of hardship, a~ required by the Variation standards in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these
findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend denial of the proposed Variation to permit an attached garage to
encroach into the required 25-foot rear side yard setback for the residence at 350 WeGo Trail. Ms. Connolly said the
Village Board's decision is final for this case.
Ms. Juracek asked if petitioners were present and wished to speak. Kelly and John D'Acquisto were sworn in. Ms.
D'Acquisto stated they had just closed on their WeGo home, which they purchased because they love the
neighborhood. She said the house was small with not much living space and that they wanted to expand and add a
family room, since there was no basemen_t/.She said that an addition to the back of their house (west lot line) would
leave no backyard for their son to play in ana that it would require covering up the windows of the bedrooms, and limit
the light to the bedrooms. She said that an addition in the front yard would disrupt a large maple tree and the
driveway. Also, there would be a cost savings in not ripping up the driveway. Ms. D'Acquisto said that they chose
their proposed addition design because this design would also allow them to maintain the same roof structure and not
have to build a double gable roof, which she felt would not be in character with the neighboring homes.
Mr. Rogers asked about the size of the maple tree and was told it was about 50' in height, with a very wide trunk.
Merrill Cotton asked if the proposed garage would extend further toward WeGo than the neighbor's garage. Ms.
D'Acquisto said it would be at the same distance from WeGo and look more like the neighbor's house.
Ms. Juracek compared the petitioners' house to a house on WeGo and Pendleton Streets and said she thought it
appeared that the houses had been originally built offset as they were in order to allow mom sunlight to reach the
neighbors' houses and to provide a wider vista. She then asked if members of the audience wished to speak.
Henry W. Youngquist, 320 S. WeGo Trail, was sworn in. He directed the Zoning Board's-attention to a letter he had
sent them, which protests this request. He said that the view from his sunroom would be drastically reduced with the
proposed plan and that he would only have a view of a brick wall. He pointed out that the petitioners could add on to
the front or back of the house without encroaching into the required setbacks.
Hal Ettinger pointed out to the D'Acquistos that they would need to contend with a difference in grade level and would
need to address that with a step up to their existing living area.
Tony Andrews, 8212 N. Newcastle, Niles, contractor for the proposed addition, was sworn in. After some discussion
with Mr. Ettinger, Mr. Andrews came to the conclusion that a step from one area to the next would accommodate the
change in grade level.
Mr. Henry Youngquist returned to the podium to state that the tree in question is a sugar maple. He said that it xvas
very brittle and not in good shape because of all the salt that it comes in contact with in winter. He said he thinks the
tree will need to be removed shortly and that it should not be the basis for allowing the home to encroach into the
setback.
Several Zoning Board members had questions about the staff sketches, which showed the location of the garage
complying with the 25-foot rear setback. Ms. Connolly said that the exhibits were prepared to illustrate that the
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 19-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
improvements could be made while staying within the prescribed setbacks. Ms. Jumcek clarified for the Zoning Board
members that they will vote on the plan proposed by the petitioner.
Mr. Keith Youngquist told the group that he would abstain from voting, since Mr; Henry Youngquist is his father and
that he had been raised in the home at 320 WeGo Trail. Mr. Youngquist said that this is a request for a substantial
variation to a rear yard setback and that he has always voted no in such cases and would vote no again if he were to
vote on this case. He said he did not approve of the design, which did not show a clear reason for the request. He
pointed out that the variation, if granted, would apply to the entire north setback line and could Icad to further additions
on that side.
Mr. Etlinger said that a hardship had not been proven in this case.
Ms. Juracek said that the petitioners request was logical, but that the petitioners had alternatives in which to expand the
house and acquire more living space in a manner that complied with the required setbacks
At 8:40, Chairperson Juracek closed the public heating.
Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve the request for a Variation to allow
construction ora garage to encroach 11'2" i~ato the rear setback at 350 S. WeGo, Case No. ZBA-19-01. Leo Flores
seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Flores,
NAYS: Ettinger, Rogers and Sumcek
ABSTENTION: Youngquist
Motion was denied 3-2.
Ms. Jumcek explained that the Village Board's decision would be final for this case and would be heard at their
August 7th meeting.
At 10:00 p.m., after the Zoning -Board heard three more cases and tabled Case No. ZBA-21-01 to the August 23~d
meeting, Merrill Cot'ten made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Hal Ettinger. The motion was approved by a voice
vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-20-2001 Hearing Date: July 26, 2001
PETITIONER: Mark Miller
202 N. Prospect Manor
PUBLICATION DATE: July t 1, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Conditional Use to allow construction of an unenclosed porch into the front
. yard
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: I~o'~e
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Mark Miller
Walt Dohrmann
John Brekkel
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes of the June 28, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0; Merrill Cotton and Keith Youngquist were not at the June meeting. At 8:40 p.m., after hearing three
cases, Ms. Arlene Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-20-01, a request for a Conditional Use to allow construction of an
unenclosed porch into the front yard.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the subject
property is an existing home located on an interior lot. The home is currently set back almost 30' from the front lot
line. The applicant is in the process of improving their house and adding an addition to the rear of the house. As part
of the home improvement project, the applicant would like to construct an unenclosed porch along the front of the
house, leaving a 25-foot setback. Ms. Connolly said this requires Conditional Use approval, as the porch would
encroach into the required 30' setback. The encroachment of the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional
Use in the RA district and the house, including the addition, meets all other zoning requirements.
Ms. Connolly said Staff had reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan, and visited the site and found that
the petitioner's request for an unenclosed porch meets the standards for a Conditional Use, which relate to not having a
detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; that the unenclosed porch will not
be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of
those properties; that adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize
congestion on Village streets; and the request is in compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances.
Ms. Connolly reported that the single-family residential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the
proposed Conditional Use, nor would the porch have a significant effect on the public welfare. The porch would not
have a negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets and the proposed Conditional Use will
be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The proposed unenclosed
porch meets the Conditional Use standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance.
Zoning Board of Appeals
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ZBA-20-2001
Page 2
Ms. Connolly said that, based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the
Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach into the required front
setback for the residence at 202 N. Prospect Manor. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
Ms. Jumcek asked if the petitioner wished to address the Zoning Board. Mark Miller, 202 N. Prospect Manor, was
sworn in and stat~l that the proposed porch would replace a concrete stoop and service walk and would enhance the
overall appearance of the home and would be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood.
John Brekkel ofJ & J Construction, 130 East Wood Avenue, Barrington, and contractor of the project, was sworn in
and testified that the porch would be constructed of cedar wood and would be an extension of the existing roofline. He
explained that the sidewalk and stoop had been removed already because the excavator was at the home for another
part of the project and did all the concrete removal at one time.
At 8:48, Chairperson Juracek closed the public heating and asked for a motion.
Keith Youngquist moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve the request for a Conditional Use
to allow construction of an unenclosed porc. h into the front yard leaving a 25~foot setback for Case No. ZBA-20-01 at
202 Prospect Manor. Leo Floros secondec~e motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros, Ettinger, Rogers, Youngquist and Juracek
NAYS:
Motion was approved 6-0.
At 10:00 p.m., after the Zoning Board heard two more cases and tabled Case No. ZBA-21-01 to the August 23rd
meeting, Merrill Cotten made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Hal Ettinger. The motion was approved by a voice
vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner
C;ITMP~ZBA-20-01 202 Prospect M~nor doc
MINUTES OF THE, REGULAR MEETING OF TH~,
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-22-2001 Hearing Date: July 26, 2001
PETITIONERS: Brian and Carrie Kraeger
1004 Callero Circle
PUBLICATION DATE: July 11, 2001 Daily Herald
REQUEST: Variation to allow construction of an addition to the house that would
encroach into the side yard setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
· Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Counolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mpc Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Brian and Carrie Krueger
Andrew Venable
Chairperson Arlene Juraeek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes of the June 28, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0; Merrill Cotton and Keith Youngquist were not at the June meeting. At 9:20, Chairperson Arlene Juracek
introduced Case No. ZBA-22-01, a request for a Variation to allow construction of an addition to the house that would
encroach into the side yard setback.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the subject
property is a house located on an interior lot on a cul-de-sac residential street. The size of the subject lot is recorded as
60' x 133.33' and zoned R2 Attached Single Family Residence. The petitioners applied for a Building Permit for an
addition to the rear of the house. During the review process, it was determined that the proposed setback for the
addition did not comply with current Zoning requirements. In this case, a 6-foot setback is required, but the addition
would have a 5'7" setback that would decrease to 5'2.5" as the addition extends north.
Ms. Connolly said that the exterior of the addition would be cedar material, and used as a family room. The
petitioner's plans show that the front of the house is setback 5' 9" from the east lot line while the rear of the house is
setback 5' 7". The existing sethaeks do not.conform to current code requirements, but are grandfathered in. The
Zoning Ordinance requires that new construction meet current Zoning requirements, so the addition is required to
maintain a 6' setback from the east lot line. The petitioner is seeking a variation to maintain the existing setback from
the east lot line and states that a variation is needed due to the location of the house with respect to the property lines.
Ms. Cormully reported that staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan, visited the site, and found that
the size, shape, and development of the property are typical of most residential properties in the Village. Village
records do not show that the developer received relief from Zoning requirements, which required a side yard setback to
be 10' or 10% of lot width, whichever was less, when the development was built in 1976. However, the house was
built on a slight angle and the existing setbacks along the east lot line do not comply with current code requirements.
Ms. Connolly said that, in order to approve a Variation, the request must meet the standards listed in the Zoning
Ordinance, which relate to: the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an
interest in the property; a lack of desire to increase financial gain; and protection of the public welfare, other property,
and neighborhood character.
Zoning Board of Appeals
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ZBA-22-2001
Page 2
Ms. Connolly said that, although the petitioner is creating his own hardship by expanding the house into the required
setback, the fact that the house was constructed on an angle is a unique physical condition of the subject property.
Also, the addition would not be likely to have a negative effect on the character of the neighborhood or the public
welfare.
Ms. Connolly pointed out that the variation would not have a detrimental effect on neighborhood character and the fact
that the house was built on an angle supports a finding of hardship, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Based on
these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA approve the proposed Variation to permit an enclosed structure to
encroach into the side yard setback, maintaining no less than a 5' 2.5" side yard setback for the residence at 1004
Callero Circle. The Zoning Board's decision is final for this case.
Andrew Vanemore, 6825 N. Lincoln, Lincoinwood, the amhitect for the proposed addition, was sworn in and testified
that the Krueger's had lived in the home for five years, have four children and need added family space. The home is a
two-flat. Mr. Vanable presented renderings and floor plans for the addition at the easel. He'said that they are limited
in their choices for expanding the structure to provide more living space due to the location of the rear exit and a
cantilevered area over two bedrooms. He said that any other addition to this structure would also require a Variation
and that the 5'2.5" side yard setback could be considered a relatively small request.
Keith Youngquist asked about the loeatiot~ of the condensing unit for the air conditioner. Mr. Krueger said it had
originally been in the back of the house ~nd several years ago they received a Variation to move it to the side of the
house. Mr. Youngquist said he could understand from the drawings and window locations why the addition needed to
be located where it was designed. Richard Rogers also commended the petitioner for their drawings.
At 9:34, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members
Richard Rogers moved to approve the request for a Variation to allow construction of an addition to the house that
would encroach into the side yard setback at 1004 Callero Circle, Case No. ZBA-22-01. Merrill Cotten seconded the
motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Ettinger, Floros, Rogem, Youngquist and Juracek
NAYS:
Motion was approved 6-0.
At 10:00 p.m., after the Zoning Board heard one more cases and tabled Case No. ZBA-21-01 to the August 23rd
meeting, Merrill Cotten made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Hal Ettinger. The motion was approved by a voice
vote and the meeting was adjourned. -
Barbara Swia}ek, Planning Secretary ·
~-'J'~ Y2(~n-nblly/S~nibr Planner ~
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-23SR-2001 Hearing Date: July 26, 2001
PETITIONERS: Icon Identity Solutions, Sign Installer, for
Warren Hardie
Leiserv Inc. (Brunswick Zone)
1 N. Field Court
Lake Forest, IL 60045
PUBLICATION DATE: . July 11, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Special Use for an Electronic Message Board Sign and Variation for a 323 s.f.
Wall Sign
]MEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
.Richard Rogers
I~elth Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Denice Joyce
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. The minutes or'he June 28, 2001 meeting were
approved 44); Merrill Cotton and Keith Youngquist were not at the June meeting. At 9:35, after the ZBA heard five
other cases and tabled Case No. ZBA-214)I to the August 23~a meeting, Chairperson Arlene Juracek introduced Case
No. ZBA-23SR-01, a request for a Special Use for an Electronic Message Board Sign and Variation for a 323 s.f. Wall
Sign.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Counolly stated that the subject
property is zoned B3 and is used as a bowling alley. The site was recently purchased and is in the process of being
updated to a Brunswick Zone Bowling Alley. As part of the improvements, the existing signs will be removed and
· replaced with new signs that reflect the new ownership. The petitioner is seeking a variation to construct a wall sign
that is larger than the 150 square feet that is permitted by the Sign Code and a Special Use permit to install an
electronic message board as part of the freestanding sign.
Ms. Connolly said there are currently two wall signs displayed on the building. The text sign, "Thunderbird Lanes"
measures 7' x 48' (336 sq. ft.) and the box placed around the logo, a bird, measures 13.5' x 22' (297) totaling 633
square feet. According to Village records, the existing signs were installed in 1977, which was before the current Sign
Code regulations were adopted in 1986. She said that the Sign Code required nonconforming freestanding signs to be
removed or receive a vafiation by 1996, but did not make provisions for removing nonconforming wall signs.
Therefore, the wall signs were allowed to remain. Since the wall signs will be removed, they are no longer
grandfathered in and the new signs must comply with current Sign Code requirements.
Ms. Connolly described the proposed wall sign as broken into an 8' x 34.5' measurement and a 9'1" x 18.5'
measurement which creates a 323 square foot wall sign. The building is located perpendicular to Rand Road, and the
center of the proposed wall sign will be 270-feet from Rand Road, the west property line. In the past, the Sign Review
Board reviewed requests for code relief from the Sign Code. Variations were granted for larger wall signs when
businesses were located a significant distance from the fight-of-way and had large front elevations (signable areas).
Zoning Board of Appeals
Arlene J'meek, Chairperson ZBA-23SR-01
Page 2
The Sewel at 392 & the K-Mart at 366 are comparable to this request.
Ms. Connolly said that, in order to approve the petitioner's request for a 323 square foot wall sign, the Zoning Board
must find that: the sign allowed under code regulations will not reasonably identify the business; the hardship is
created by unique circumstances and not serve as convenience to the petitioner, and that the hardship is not created by
the person presently having an interest in the sign or property; the variation will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood; the variation will not impair
visibility to the adjacent property, increase the danger of traffic problems or endanger the public safety, or alter the
essential character of the neighborhood; and be in harmony with the spirit and intent of the Sign Code.
Ms. Connolly explained that the basis for granting other variations for larger wall signs was that the signs were being
placed on expansive front elevations that were set back behind a large parking lot. The justification for the proposed
wall sign is consistent with the findings for the previous eases. The proposed variation is in keeping with the
Standards for Sign Variations listed in the Sign Code and Staff recommends that the Zoning Board approve the
petitioner's request to install a 323 square foot wall sign for the property at 824 E. Rand Road. The Zoning Board's
decision is final for this request.
The second part of the case was a request for an Electronic Message Board Sign. Ms. Connolly said the text, graphic,
and message band on the proposed freegtanding sign face measures 53.75 square feet. The sign measures 12-feet from
grade to the top of the sign meets applica'~le sign code requirements for height and size of a freestanding sign. She
said that electronic message centers are listed as Special Uses in the Sign Code. The proposed eleetronie message
board will be 12.5 square feet and have one line of text to promote events relevant to the operation of the bowling
alley. The ZBA may approve Special Uses if the request meets the standards listed in the Sign Code, which relate to:
protection of public safety and welfare; harmony with the scale and architecture of nearby buildings and signs; lack of
negative impacts on adjacent properties or signs; and compliance with other provisions of the Sign Regulations.
Ms. Counolly said the proposed electronic message board would be on a freestanding sign along a major arterial road,
~ adjacent to commercial uses. The sign is located over 1,000-feet from the Northwest Electric electronic message board,
which was approved by the ZBA last year. The proposed design and materials are consistent with the proposed commercial
building and other signs in the area. The sign meets all applicable Sign Regulations regarding height, size, and design.
Ms. Connolly noted that as with other sign requests, Special Use signs are generally appropriate for most commercial and/or
arterial road locations, but may present situations that need special consideration and/or control. Special Use approval for an
electronic message center is intended to ensure that the sign meets safety and aesthetic concerns of the Village, as laid out in
the standards described above.
Ms. Connolly said that based on review of the Special Use standards, the design of the proposed sign, and its location
on the site, Staff recommends that the ZBA approve the proposed Special Use to permit an electronic message center
on the freestanding sign at the Brunswick Zone, 824 E. Rand Road, with the condition that the electronic message
center must meet the requirements of Section 7.330.A at all times. The Village may revoke this approval for violations
of those requirements, i.e. it is determined that the electronic message poses a traffic hazard.
Richard Rogers clarified that the wall sign faces south and does not actually face Rand Road although it can be viewed
from Rand Road. He asked if landscaping was required for the freestanding sign. Ms. Connolly said that the
petitioner has not sought relief from that requirement; therefore landscaping would be provided as required by the Sign
Code. Mr. Rogers asked if public information messages v;,ould be required on the electronic sign and Ms. Connolly
said yes and that the Sign Code requires it.
Mr. Floros asked what the maximum size of the wall sign permitted by the Sign Code and the square footage being
requested. Ms. Connolly said the Sign Code permitted up to 150 s.f. for wall signs and that the petitioner was asking
for 323 s.f. Mr. Rogers said that in the past, when a wall sign was located substantially far back from the street as in
the case of Bally's Health Club and Office Max, the Sign Review Board allowed them to double the size of that sign.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-23 SR-01
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
Deniee Joyce, 2732 N. Newland in Chicago, was sworn in. Ms. Joyce said that she is the Permit Coordinator for Icon
Signs. She commended Ms. Connolly on her presentation of the case and said that originally they requested a sign that
measured close to 600 s.f., but worked with Ms. Connolly to reduce the size of the sign so it was large enough to meet
the clients' needs and was similar in size to previous wall signs approved by the Village in the past. Ms. Joyee said
that they have reduced the wall sign to the smallest size possible to accommodate the letterset necessary to be seen
from the substantial setback fi-om Rand Road.
At 9:55, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members
Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to allow a 323 square.foot wall sign at 824 East Rand Road,
Brunswick Zone, Case No. ZBA-23SR-01, with the condition that there be no additional signs on the front of the
building. Merrill Cotten seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Ettinger, Floros, Rogers, Youngquist and Juracek
NAYS:
Motion was approved 6-0
Richard Rogers moved to approve the request for an Electronic Message Center at 824 East Rand Road, Brunswick
Zone, Case No. ZBA-23SR-01, with the condition that it meet all sign ordinances. Keith Youngquist seconded the
motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Rogers, Youngquist and Juraeek
NAYS: Cotton, Ettinger
Motion was approved 4-2.
At 10:00 p.m., Merrill Cotten made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Hal Ettinger. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
MINUTES
COFFEE WITH COUNCIL
Saturday, August 11, 2001
09:00 a.m.
Floor Conference Room, Village Hall
Meeting convened at 9:00 AM. Those, present: Michaele Skowron, Paul Hoefert, Village
Manager Michael Janonis, Police Chief Richard Eddington, and Fire Chief Mike Figolah.
Residents in Attendance:
David Schein 700 West Ivanhoe
Ramon Ruble 41-2.North Elmhurst
Carol Tortorello 223'S. Elmhurst Ave.
Merrill Cotton 2710 Briarwood Drive West
A1 Pastemak 1906 Connie Lane
Ramon Ruble inquired about the reason the Village ground the sidewalk in front of his home
and why his neighbors' sidewalk was patched with blacktop. Village Manager Janonis stated that
grinding was one method of making sidewalks safe for travel. Janonis went on to explain that
some of the sidewalks are being patched with blacktop until money was made available to
replace.
Merrill Cotton asked if a definition of "hardship" could be provided to the Zoning Board of
Appeals. At the last Village Board meeting the meaning of hardship was once again questioned.
A discussion ensued. Trustee Skowron stated that she thought that this topic has merit for
discussion. Mr. Cotton asked for statistics regarding Senior Center use and-library transactions.
Mr. Cotton also stated that in lieu of the poor 2002 budget projections, the Village Board should
consider puffing the Village Hall and parking structure project on hold until better economic
times. Trustees Skowron and Hoefert explained their reasons that they believe the projects
should continue.
A1 Pasternak opened with a general discussion about the downtown redevelopment. Mr.
Pasternak expressed concern that the Village Board is going forward with a new village hall and
parking structure without asking for resident input in the form of a referendum. Trustees
Skowron and Hoefert explained why they supported the decision. Mr. Pastemak provided his
opinion that redevelopment should not be solely based on bricks and mortar. He favored having
activities that bring people together. He passed out examples of car shows that take place in
Downers Grove, Elmhurst, and Lombard. Trustees Skowron and Hoefert identified many similar
activities that are held in Mount Prospect. Mr. Pastemak also questioned the Senior Center space
use in the proposed Village Hall. Trustees Skowron and Hoefert explained that they favor
Community" space rather than specific "Senior" space. Within that space many of the existing
senior programs will be provided for. Mr. Pastemak expressed concern that the Mount Prospect
Public Library is poised to ask for a large mount of money for additional space and renovation.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding how libraries and other public entities have changed over
the years. The last issue fi.om Mr. Pastemak was a request to the Villag6' Board t~6t to raise the
cost of vehicle stickers. He explained that he is a car enthusiast and owns several collector
automobiles.
Carol Tortorello questioned the Village Manager about the fees paid to SWANC. In view of
recent decisions will the Village be refunded their contributions? The Village Manager explained
that the sale of property will be used to retire existing debt. The Village will realize some cost
savings fi.om a reduction in future tipping fees.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 am.
Respectfully Submitted, - '.'-'
Michael Figolah
Fire Chief
VILLAGE BOARD WORKSHOP
JULY 21, 2001
MINUTES
The meeting was convened at 8:15 a.m. by Mayor Farley. Present at the meeting were
Trustees Timothy Corcoran, Paul Hoefert, Richard Lohrstorfer, Michaele Skowron,
lrvana Wilks and Michael Zadel, Staff present included: Village Manager Michael
Janonis, Assistant Village Ma.nager David Strahl, Community Development Director
William Cooney and Deputy Community Development Director Michael Blue. Other
persons present included: Carol Tortorello, Mary Lynn Bower, Jeff Brunner, Ann
Smilanic and Hal Ettinger.
Village Manager Janonis provided a general overview of the efforts the staff had
Undertaken to date regarding the selection of architects and construction managers and
how the staff undertook the process to narrow the field to three firms for interviews this
morning. He stated each team would be allotted approximately 40 minutes for their
presentation which should allow sufficient time for questions and discussions regarding
the process and the approach of each team. Interviews were conducted with Ross
Barney and Jankowski with Bulley & Andrews as the construction management team.
The second interview was with DLK and W.B. Olson as the construction management
team. The final interview was with OKW and Valenti Builders as the construction
management team.
After the interviews were concluded, a short discussion took place regarding the
process but no recommendation was made.
The meeting adjourned at 12:05 p.m.
Respecffu. lly su bmitted, /~
DAVID STRAHL
Assistant Village Manager
DS/rcc