HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 07/17/2001Next Ordinance No. 5200
Next Resolution No. 44-01
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday
50 South Emerson Street July 17, 2001
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Irvana Wilks
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Michael Zadel
II1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Corcoran
IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Zadel
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 5, 2001
APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 5, 2001
APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 19, 2001
APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 3, 2001
VI. *APPROVE BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
(To be considered under Consent Agenda)
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Appointments
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT '100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-600(~, TDD 84.7/392-6064
IX. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk are considered routine by the Village Board and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of those items unless a
Board member, or resident from the audience so reqaests, in which event the item wil
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in it~ normal sequence on the agenda.
X. OLD BUSINESS
Xl. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 12-01,600 W. Kensingtor~ Road; Residence
1 s~ reading.of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 600 W. KENSINGTON ROAD (Exhibit A)
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for the construction of a
circular driveway. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval
by a vote of 3-1.
B. ZBA 13-01, 17 Audrey Lane, Residence
1s' reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17 AUDREY LANE (Exhibit B)
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for an unenclosed, covered porch
to encroach into front setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended
approval by a vote of 4-0.
C. ZBA 14-01,305 N. Fairview Avenue, Residence
1s' reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL LISE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 305 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE (Exhibit C
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for an unenclosed, covered porch
to encroach into front setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended
approval by a vote of 4-0.
D. ZBA 15-01,418 S. Na-Wa-Ta Avenue, Residence
1sT reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 418 SOUTH NA-WA-TA AVENUE -- (Exhibit D
This ordinance grants a variation for an unenclosed, covered porch to
encroach into the exterior side yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals
has recommended approval, by a vote of 4-0
E. ZBA 16-01,1006 W. Isabella Street, Residence
Is` readin~c of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1006 WEST ISABELLA STREET Exhibit E
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for an unenclosed porch to
encroach into the front set back. The Zoning Board of Appeals has
recommended approval by a vote of 4-0.
F. ZBA 16-01,1006 W. Isabella Street, Residence
1 ~' reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1006 WEST ISABELLA STREET (Exhibit F
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for a circular driveway.
The Zoning Board voted 4~0 to denythe request
G, *a RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXCUTION OF a RAILROAD (Exhibit G)
RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION LEASE BE'I'VVEEN
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
H Safety Commission recommendations:
Removal of the temporary curb extension along with the yellow striping around
Lions Park Elementary School
I. *Request for Board adoption of the 2002-2006 Capital Improvements Plan
Xll. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Status Report
Xlll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XlV. CLOSED SESSION
LITIGATION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (11 ) - Litigation, when an action against, affecting or on
behalf of the'particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court of administrative
tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probably or imminent, in which case
the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting.
PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 lc)(1) - The appointment, employment, compensation, discipline.
performance, or dismissal of specific employees of the public body, including hearing testimony
on a complaint lodged against and employee to determine its validity.
PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (2) - Collective negotiation matter between the public body and its
employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more
classes or employees.
XV. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
June 5, 2001
CALL CALL TO ORDER
TO ORDER Mayor Gerald Farley called the meeting to order at 6:10 p.m.
ROLL CALL ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Trustee Michael Zadel
Absent: Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
MAYOR'S
REPORT: MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Farley opened this portion of the meeting with'a prepared statement declaring a
ELMHURST hearing on an appeal from the revocation of the business license held by the
ACCUPRESSURE owner of Elmhurst Accupressure, at 1840 South Elmhurst Road.
1840 S.
ELMHURST A licensed court reporter was present to officially record all actions of this meeting.
ROAD
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
OTHER None.
BUSINESS
CLOSED CLOSED SESSION
SESSION Following legal arguments from both parties, and questions from Village board members,
the Board convened in Closed Session at 6:48 p.m. to discuss the following:
"LITIGATION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c)(11 ) - Litigation, when an action against, affecting or on
behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or
administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or
imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the
minutes of the closed meeting."
Alt members were present, with the exception of Trustees Corcoran and Lohrstorfer.
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT
The Closed Session was adjourned at 7:25 p.m., after which the Board convened in the
regular scheduled Village Board meeting at 7:40 p.m.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
June 5, 2001
CALL CALL TO ORDER
Mayor
Gerald Farley called the meeting to order at 7:40
p.m.
TO
ORDER
ROLL CALL ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Trustee Michael Zadel
Absent: Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
PLEDGE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Trustee Skowron led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION
INVOCATION
Trustee Wilks gave the invocation.
MINUTES
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held May 15, 2001.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Farley, Skowron, Zadel
Nays: None
Abstain: Hoefert, Wilks
Motion carried.
Trustee Zadel, seconded by Trustee Comoran, moved to approve the minutes of the
special meeting held May 24, 2001.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Farley, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
BILLS
APPROVE BILLS
Mayor Farley stated that the next item on the agenda, "APPROVE BILLS "was noted by
an asterisk, and that all items further listed in that manner would be considered with
one vote under as "IX. CONSENT AGENDA."
MAYOR'S MAYOR'S REPORT
REPORT: An ordinance was presented for first reading to amend Chapter 13 (Alcoholic Liquors) of
the Village Code by increasing the number of Class "W" (Restaurant, beer and wine only)
AMEND CH 13: by one, for Kate's Thai Kitchen, at 1716 East Kensington Road.
KATE'S THAi
Trustee Corooran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to waive the rule requiring two
KITCHEN, 1716 readings of an ordinance.
E. KENSINGTON
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Zadel, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5191 No. 5191:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS) OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
NATIONAL Motion carried.
FLAG DAY,
JUNE 14, 2001 Mayor Farley presented a proclamation in recognition of National Flag Day, June 14,
2001.
NATIONAL
CATHOLIC Mayor Farley read a proclamation designating June 15, 2001 as "National Catholic
Society of Foresters Day" in the Village. The proclamation was accepted by Sue
SOCIETY OF Koleczek, the organization's National President.
FORESTERS
DAY, JUNE 15 There were no recommendations for appointments to boards or commissions.
ADD AGENDA Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to add a business item to the
ITEM agenda, that being an ordinance to amend Chapter 18 of the Village Code. The item
would be considered under "Xlll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS."
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None.
CONSENT
AGENDA: CONSENT AGENDA
Trustee Wilks asked that the following items, "XI. G." and "XII. B," be removed from the
Consent Agenda, to be discussed separately.
BILLS
Trustee Wilks, seconded uy Trustee Zadel. moved for approval of the following
items of business:
RES. NO. 32-01,
SUNRISE 1. Bills, dated May 31. 2001
PLAZA PLAT
2. RES. NO. 32-01: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF
RES. NO. 33-01, CONSOLIDATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 905 EAST RAND ROAD
SCHWARZBECK (SUNRISE PLAZA SUBDIVISION)
PLAT
3. RES. NO. 33-01: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF
SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10 SOUTH ELM STREET
RES. NO. 34-01, (SCHWARZBECK PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION)
AIELLO PLAT
4. RES. NO. 34-01: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF
RES. NO. 36-01 SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 227 LEONARD LANE
STREET (AIF_,LLO PLAT OF SUBDIVISION)
CLOSURES
FOR PARADE 5. RES. NO. 36-01: A RESOLUTION REQUESTING CLOSURE OF A PORTION
OF CENTRAL ROAD IN ORDER TO CONDUCT A PARADE
ST. RAYMOND
LANDSCAPE 6. Board approval to pay $40,000 to St. Raymond Catholic Church to cover the
EXPENSES Village's portion of costs for the installation of landscape and fence
improvements along Route 83, between Lincoln Avenue and Shabonee Trail.
2
AGRMT. BTWN. 7. Board authorizatiOn ft~r Mayor Farley to sign an agreement with the Illinois
Department of TranSp0~tation for the train depot parking lot and Streetscape
VOMP & IDOT Project, located ajong N6Ai~we{t Highway, Main Street, and Emerson Street.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
An ordinance was presented for first reading to grant a Conditional Use permit to allow
ZBA 10-01 the construction of an unenclosed porch within twenty-five feet (25') of the front property
310 N. OWEN line. The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) had recommended approval of the petitioner's
ST. request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. NO. 5192 Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for approval of Ordinance
No. 5192:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 310 NORTH OWEN STREET
Upon roil call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 08-01
An ordinance was presented for first reading to grant variations and a Conditional Use
GOLF PLAZA I, permit for a Planned Unit Development, the construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. drive-through
SW CORNER pharmacy, and other buildings on the property.
OF GOLF &
BUSSE ROADS The Zoning Board had recommended approval of the request with a vote of 6-0, with
conditions relative to parking, landscaping, and traffic signage around the pharmacy.
William Cooney, Director of Community Development, presented a revised site plan at
the Village Board meeting.
Representatives for the petitioner, the DiMucci Company, addressed numerous concerns
from members of the Board, relative to parking congestion, the accessibility of delivery
trucks to the proposed pharmacy, and the effects that the proposed parking plan might
have on other businesses in the plaza.
Mr. Tom Niemire, DiMucci representative, answered questions from Trustee Hoefert
relative to a.second property at the southeast corner of Golf and Busse Roads, also
owned by the DiMucci Company. Mr. Niemira stated that the company has plans for the
construction of a Dunkin' Donuts on the site later this year. Because the property has not
been maintained well for a number of months, Trustee Hoefert requested and received a
commitment from Mr. Niemire, that regardless of whether a new business is constructed
there or not, the property will be properly landscaped by September 15, 2001.
This ordinance will be presented for second reading at the June 19 Village Board
meeting. At the request of Trustee Corcoran, staff will present a detailed, more
acceptable plan for truck deliveries to the pharmacy, at that same meeting.
3
ZBA 09-01 An ordinance was presented for first reading to grant a Conditional Use permit for the
1758 W. GOLF establishment of an amusement center (billiards) inside the former World's Gym, at the
ROAD Mount Prospect Commons shopping center. The space is currently vacant.
The Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended approval of the petitioner's request by a
vote of 5-1.
The petitioner, Terry Philippas, addressed the Board's concerns relative to hours of
operation and age groups that would be served. Also, of major concern was whether the
petitioner has any plans to sell liquor at the business. Mr. Philippas stated that he has no
plans to apply for a liquor license in the immediate or distant future; rather that the
billiards parlor would be a family establishment and that no liquor would be sold.
The ordinance will be presented at the June 19 meeting for second reading.
A resolution was presented authorizing the Village to issue a license to the Mount
Prospect Lions Club for the annual farmers market. This resolution was listed as a
FARMERS Consent Agenda item, but was removed at the request of Trustee Wilks, who asked the
MARKET exact dates of the farmers market, which are Sundays, from June 10-October 14, 2001.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for approval of Resolution
No. 35-01:
RES. NO. 35-01 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT OF LICENSE
WITH THE MOUNT PROSPECT LIONS CLUB TO CONDUCT A FARMERS
MARKET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would adopt the prevailing wage
rates established by the State of Illinois for public works projects by contractors.
STATE Adoption of this ordinance is required annually by the State.
PREVAILING
WAGE RATES Trustee Corcoran. seconded oy Trustee Hoefert, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon rolt call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran. seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for approval of Ordinance
~ No, 5193:
ORD. NO. 5193 AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A DETERMINATION OF THE PREVAiLiNG
WAGE RATES
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MANAGER'S VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A request was presented for Board approval to accept an engineering proposal from the
REPORT Ciorba Group, Inc. for the design of streetlights along Central Road from Northwest
Highway to Route 83. This request was listed as a Consent Agenda item but was
STREETLIGHT removed for discussion at the request of Trustee Wilks.
IMPROVE-
MENTS, Trustee Zadel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to accept the proposal from the
CIORBA Ciorba Group, Inc. for $27,638 for pedestrian and roadway lighting on Central Road
GROUP, INC. between Northwest Highway and Route 83. Funding for the project will,come from the
$400,000 Illinois First grant.
4
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron. Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
AMEND CH. 18, An ordinance was presented for firs{ reading which would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic) by
PARKING creating several thirty (30) minute parking spaces in the Village Hall area, to alleviate the
SPACES current parking problems which have resulted from recent construction. This ordinance
was not listed on the agenda, but was voted for consideration earlier in the meeting.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowren, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. NO. 5194 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
No. 5194:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Hoefert complimented Public Works and Police Department staff members who
had received letters from citizens thanking them for assistance shown in various ways,
within the last month.
Trustee Wilks inquired as to whether the Village has money deposited in area banks that
have expressed support for O'Hare International Airport's efforts to create additional
runways. She requested a list of those banks because the Village Board recently
approved a resolution stating its opposition to new runways being built.
Village Manager Michael Janonis stated that staff would make that information available
to the Board.
CLOSED CLOSED SESSION
SESSION ' Mayor Farley stated the Board would convene in Closed Session immediately following
this meeting, to continue a Closed Session, which was held earlier in the evening, prior to
this regular Village Board meeting.
The Board convened in Closed Session at 9:00 p.m. with all Board members present
except Trustee Lohrstorfer.
The Board reconvened in Open Session at 9:35 p.m. with all Board members present
except Trustee Lohrstorfer. There was no official discussion of business items.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
The June 5, 2001 Village Board meeting was officially adjourned at 9:37 p.m.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
5
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
June 19, 2001
CALL CALL TO ORDER
TO ORDER Village Clerk Velma Lowe called the meeting to order at 7:37 p.m.
ROLL CALL ROLL CALL
Present: Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Paul Hoefed
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Absent: Trustee Michael Zadel
Mayor Gerald Farley
MAYOR Due to the absence of Mayor Farley, the Clerk called for nominations for Mayor Pro Tern.
PRO TEM
CORCORAN Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for approval of Trustee Corcoran to
serve as Mayor Pro mem.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PLEDGE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Trustee Wilks led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION INVOCATION
Trustee Lohrstorfer gave the invocation.
MINUTES DEFERRAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to defer the minutes
of both the special meeting and the regular meeting held June 5, 2001, due to an
insufficient number of members present, for approval of either.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The minutes will, again, be presented for approval at the July 3, 2001 Village Board
meeting.
BILLS,
FINANCIAL APPROVE BILLS & FINANCIAL REPORT
REPORT Trustee Corcoran stated that the next item on the agenda, "APPROVE BILLS &
FINANCIAL REPORT" was noted by an asterisk, and that all items further listed in that
manner would be considered with one vote under as "IX. CONSENT AGENDA."
MAYOR'S MAYOR'S REPORT
REPORT Mount Prospect Police Officer Kimberly Nagel recognized the following individuals for
their service to the Village as Peer Jury members since its inception in 1996, and 1997:
PEER JURY CHARTER MEMBERS SINCE 1996 SCHOOL
RECOGNITION Geoffrey Bower Prospect
Anastasia Envall St. Viator
Scot Hohol Fremd
Matthew Kinsella St. Viator
Cassidy Kuhlmann Hersey
Ed Neumann Hersey
MEMBERS SINCE 1997
William Grossi Loyola
Eric Nitz Prospect
Annie Walters Hersey
Kevin Werderitch Miner
APPOINT- There were no recommendations for board or commission appointments,
MENTS
CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None.
ADD AGENDA
ITEM ADD AGENDA ITEM
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to consider an item not listed on
the agenda, that being a resolution approving the Village's participation in the Northwest
Transit Corridor alternatives analysis. The resolution would be considered as part of
"XI. NEW BUSINESS."
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CONSENT CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA: Village Manager Michael Janonis asked that item "XIl. VILLAGE MANAGER'S
REPORT.A_ Bid results" be removed from consent status, for discussion.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowren, moved for approval of the following
items of business:
BILLS
1. Bills, dated June 14, 2001
FINANCIAL
REPORT 2. Financial Report, dated January 1-May 31, 2001
RES. NO. 37-01, 3~ RES. NO. 37-01: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING DECISION ON APPEAL
SUSTAINING THE REVOCATION OF LICENSE #17077 AND AUTHORIZING
BUSINESS THE MAYOR TO SIGN SUCH DECISION ON APPEAL
LICENSE
APPEAL Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 08-01
GOLF PLAZA I OLD BUSINESS
SW CORNER An ordinance was presented for second reading to grant variations and a Conditional Use
OF GOLF & permit for a Planned Unit Development, the construction of a drive-through pharmacy and
BUSSE RDS. multiple buildings on the property. The Zoning Board had recommended approval by a
vote of 6-0.
Upon presentation of this case at the June 5 meeting, staff was instructed to work with
the petitioner on revising the plan for truck deliveries and access to the pharmacy. The
revised plan was presented and approved by the Board.
2
Trustee Hoefed, seconded by Tr. stee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
ORD. No. 5195:
NO. 5195 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOLF AND
BUSSE ROADS (GOLF PLAZA)
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, L0hrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 09-01 An ordinance was presented for second reading to grant a Conditional Use permit for the
1758 W. GOLF, establishment of a billiards parlor inside an existing vacant structure, previously occupied
MT. PROSPECT by the World's Gym.
COMMONS
SHOPPING Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of Ordinance
CENTER No. 5196:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1758 WEST GOLF ROAD
ORD.
NO. 5196 Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefed, Lohrstorfer, Skowren, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
AMEN D CH. 16, An ordinance was presented for first reading to amend Chapter 16 of the Village Code
DEVELOPMENT (Development), by identifying the types of construction projects that require
improvements addressed in the Development Code, and by prescribing varying levels of
CODE improvement, depending on the scale of the project.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. NO. 5197 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
No. 5197:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 (DEVELOPMENT) OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND An ordinance was presented for first reading to amend Chapter 11 (Merchants, Business,
CHAPTER 11, Occupations and Amusements) by creating a section to allow and regulate the licensing
of massage therapists. Unt th s time, the Village had not allowed the existence of any
MASSAGE business whose primary purpose is to give massages.
THERAPISTS
Trustee Hoe. fed, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron
Nays: Wilks
Motion carried.
3
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer. moved for approval of Ordinance
ORD. No. 5198:
NO. 5198 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 (MERCHANTS, BUSINESSES,
OCCUPATIONS AND AMUSEMENTS) BY CREATING ARTICLE XXXVll
ENTITLED "MASSAGE THERAPISTS"
Upon roll call: Ayes: Comoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron
Nays: Wilks
Motion carried.
NORTHWEST A resolution, not listed on the agenda, was presented which would approve the Village's
CORRIDOR participation in studies by the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) to determine a
TRANSIT STUDY locally preferred alternative for a high capacity transit program within the Northwest
Corridor. The resolution authorizes the Village to contribute an amount not to exceed
$10,000 towards the cost of the study, as a member of the Northwest Transit corridor
Municipal Task Fome.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution
RES. NO. 38-01
No. 38-01:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION IN THE
NORTHWEST TRANSIT CORRIDOR PHASE II ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert. Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MANAGER'S
REPORT VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Mr. Janonis stated that this business item, "Vehicle towing and storage contract for Police
Department" was removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion to explain that
AUTO TOWING & although the Village did conduct a bid process, and five bids were received, only two of
STORAGE the bidders met all the criteria. Of those two. Hillside Auto Body & Towing Services, Inc.
CONTRACT presented a higher contract, yet met all criteria and offered a secure storage facility to
store Village impounded vehicles in an area separate from others, while being located
close enough (Arlington Heights) to assure adequare response times. He also stated that
the Village has contracted with Hillside in past years, and always received impeccable
service.
HILLSIDE AUTO
BODY For the reasons stated, staff opted to reject all bids and award the vehicle towing and
storage contract to Hillside Auto Body. (Bid results attached to official minutes)
Trustee Hoefert. seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer. moved to award the vehicle towing
and storage contract to Hillside Auto Body, Towing Services, Inc. for July 1,2001 through
June 30, 2004.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Paul Fries, of Fries Automotive, questioned the areas in which his bid did not qualify
for the towing contract. Deputy Police Chief Ron Richardson stated that it was primarily
due to the fa. ct that Fries Automotive does not have a separate storage area for vehicles
brought in from the Village.
INTERGOVT. The Board was presented with a request for authorization for the Village to enter into an
AGREEMENT, agreement with School District 57 to allow the temporary location of mobile classrooms
across the lot line onto adjacent property owned by the Mt. Prospect Park District. The
SCHOOL
mobile classrooms are being used to ease overcrowding at Lions Park School. Because
DIST. 57 & the classrooms would be placed in a different zoning district (CR, Conservation
MT. PROSPECT Recreation), Board approval was necessary.
PARK DISTRICT
4
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trasteb Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of the Village
entering into an intergovernmental agreement to temporarily locate District 57 mobile
classrooms on Mt. Park District prbpert~;
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron. Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Skowron stated her satisfaction with the way these governmental entities
cooperatively worked out a solution to the school district's problem.
STATUS Mr. Janonis noted the upcoming dates and events:
REPORT - June 22 and 23, the traveling Viet Nam Memorial Wall, at Memory Gardens
Cemetery
· June 29-July 4, Lions Club Fair and fireworks at Melas Park
OTHER ANY OTHER BUSINESS
BUSINESS Trustee Wilks asked for information relative to the recent announcement of 3-Com's
plans to close the Mount Prospect facility and relocate to Roiling Meadows. Mr. Janonis
stated that it is unlikely that the business will officially leave before the end of this year,
and the Village has indicated his willingness to assist both 3-Corn and a real estate
broker in finding a suitable occupant for the property.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
The June 19, 2001 Village Board meeting was officially adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
July 3, 2001
CALL CALL TO ORDER
Gerald L. Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35
Mayor
p.m.
TO
ORDER
ROLL CALL ROLL CALL
Present: Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Trustee Michael Zadel
Mayor Gerald Farley
Absent: Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Paul Hoefert
POSTING OF
COLORS POSTING OF COLORS
The Mount Prospect Police Department Color Guard conducted the Posting of Colors.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PLEDGE Mayor Farley led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION INVOCATION
Trustee Wilks gave the invocation.
MINUTES DEFERRAL OF MINUTES
Mayor Farley stated that because there was not a sufficient number of Board members
present for approval of the minutes for the special meeting and the regular meeting held
June 5, 2001, as well as those for the June 19, regular meeting, it was appropriate to
defer all until the next regular meeting on July 17.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Zadel, moved to defer the minutes of the June 5,
June 12, and June 19 Village Board meetings.
Upon roil call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
BILLS The minutes will, again, be presented for approval at the July 17, 2001 Village Board
meeting.
APPROVE BILLS
Mayor Farlely stated that the next item on the agenda, "APPROVE BILLS "was noted by
an asterisk, and that all items further listed in that manner would be considered with one
MAYOR'S vote under as "IX. CONSENT AGENDA."
REPORT
MAYOR'S REPORT
Village Clerk Velma Lowe swore in the new Police Chief for the Village of Mount
Prospect, Richard Eddington.
Police Chief Eddington, assisted by Mayor Farley, presented plaques to the following
individuals, recognizing their retirements from the Village:
Police Sergeant Anthony K0tlarz, 30 years of service
Deputy Police Chief Thomas Daley, 27 years of service
Police Chief's Secretary Janice Daley, 20 years of service.
Mayor Farley presented a resolution recognizing Michele Kidd as "Miss Junior America
MISS JUNIOR City Queen."
AMERICA CITY
QUEEN Trustee Zadel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution
No. 39-01:
RES. NO. 39-01 A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MICHELE KIDD AS "MISS JUNIOR AMERICA
CITY QUEEN"
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstoffer, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ROSEMARY Mayor Farley presented a resolution to Rosemary Argus in recognition of her 26 years as
ARGUS, PARK a Mt. Prospect Park District Commissioner.
DISTRICT
COMMISSIONER Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution
No. 40-01:
RES. NO. 40-01 A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO ROSEMARY S. ARGUS FOR
SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PETE'S An ordinance was presented to increase the number of Class "W" liquor licenses issued
SANDWICH by one for Pete's Sandwich Palace, 712 E. Northwest Highway, which is under new
PALACE ownership.
712 E. NW HWY.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Zadel, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. NO. 5199 Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of Ordinance
No. 5199:
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPQINTMENTS
There were no recommendations for board or commission appointments.
CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None.
2
CONSENT CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA: Trustee Zadel, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of the following
business items:
BILLS
1. Bills, dated June 28, 2001
110 AUDREY 2. Resolution No. 41-01: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF
LANE PLAT CONSOLIDATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 110 AUDREY LANE
RES. NO. 41-01
3. Resolution No. 42-01: A RESOLUTION APPOINTING PATRICK J. SEGER AS
IMRF REP. REPRESENTATIVE TO THE ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND FOR
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
RES. NO. 42-01
4. Resolution No. 43-01: A RESOLUTION APPOINTING A REPRESENTATIVE
IPBC REP. AND ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL
PERSONNEL BENEFIT COOPERATIVE (IPBC)
RES. NO. 43-01 5. Request for Board acceptance of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.
BOARD
ACCEPTANCE OF 6. Request for Board acceptance of Tax Increment Compliance Audit for the
FINANCIAL fiscal year ended December 31,2000.
AUDITS &
REPORTS 7. Request for Board acceptance of Single Audit Act Compliance Report for the
fiscal year ended December 31,2000.
8. Request for Board acceptance of Auditor's Management Letter for the fiscal
PAVEMENT year ended December 31,2000.
MARKING 9. Bid results:
CONTRACT, Pavement marking contract (Preform Traffic Control Systems, Ltd., not to exceed
PREFORM $32,450.00).
TRAFFIC
CONTROL 10. Request for Board acceptance of Northwest Municipal Conference competitive
SYSTEMS bid award for roadway crack sealing contract (Scodeller Construction, not to
exceed $48,400).
ROADWAY
CRACK SEALING, Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfe~ Skowron, Wilks, Zadel
Nays: None
SCODELLER Motion carried.
CONSTRUCTION
OLD BUSINESS
OLD BUSINESS None.
NEW BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS
All "New Business" items were previously approved under the Consent Agenda.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
MANAGER'S Items of business listed under the "Village Manager's Report" were previously approved
REPORT under the Consent Agenda.
Mr. Janonis reminded the audience of the Village's fireworks display and 4th of July
parade.
3
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
OTHER Mayor Farley extended holiday greetings to the audience.
BUSINESS
Trustee Wilks stated that State Rep?esentatives Carolyn Krause and Rosemary Mulligan
are conducting a public hearing to address the proposed O'Hare Airport runways on
July 17, in Park Ridge.
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT
The July 3, 2001 Village Board meeting was officially adjourned at 8:07 p.m.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
4
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
'12-Jul-01
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 07/01/01 - Per Attached Credits/ Balance
07/01101 07/12/01 List of Bills Debits 07/12/01
General Fund 8,450,873 875,586 618,087 8,708,372
Special Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,567,832 69,262 118,140 1,518,954
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 2,005,695 85,597 1,920,098
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 12,042 12,042
Community Development BIk Grant Fund 38,920 22 18,359 20,583
Debt Service Funds 3,517,949 204,968 362,331 3,360,586
Capital Projects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 3,609,907 130,733 3,479,174
Capital Improvement Construction Fund 191,773 191,773
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 47,858 15,940 31,918
Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,321~887 93,920 177,116 4,238,691
Flood Control Construction Fund 3,209,427 5,649 3,215,076
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 2,927,231 266,161 311,176 2,882,216
Parking System Revenue Fund 745,365 4,385 2,226 747,524
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 246,752 5,828 240,924
Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,452,913 17,713 5,435,200
Computer Replacement Fund 357,600 794 356,806
Risk Management Fund 2,630,327 12,155 258,187 2,386,295
Trust & A,qency Funds
Police Pension Fund 3 I, 178,877 19,487 31,198,364
Fire Pension Fund 32,508,324 14,925 32,523,249
Flexcomp Trust Fund 10,120 43 10,163
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,496,843 28,302 18,220 1,506,925
Benefit Trust Funds 64,655 64,655
104,593,170 1,594,865 2,138,447 104,049,588
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 1
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESLffED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FRC~ J~NE 29 2001 TO OULY 12 2001
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCR~TIOU AMOUNT
001
02919 303 CAB ASSOCIATION, INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES 704.15
03901 3CMA AMNUA~ DUES 350.00
AMNUAL COUKEKE2]CE 430. O0
780.00
02955 ACNE TRUCK BRAKE & SUPPLY CO. BATTERIES 264.48
01010 ACTIVE ALAR~ COMPANY, INC. MONITORING SERVICE 135.00
05164 ADCO DISPLAY MATERIALS CORROBUFF DECORATIONS 583.85
01169 AERIA~ EQUI~KET, INC. FINERGIASS POLE 97.32
05338 AFFORDABLE SIGNS & GRAPHICS 4TH OF UNLY BANNERS 286.20
01195 AGA GAS, INC. RENTAL 103.85
06146 AICPA DUES-ELLSWORTN 125.00
01246 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL CYLINDER RENTAL 106.25
01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. MAINTENANCE OF ELEVATOR 161.63
01561 AMERICAN CHARGE SERVICE SENIOR TAXI RIDES 366.30
05222 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL UNIFOUN RENTAL 27!.20
00367 ANDERSON, DONALD M. BATTERIES 6.26
05052 ARLINGTONES BARBERSHOP CHORUS 4TH OF JULY PARADE 323.00
06144 ARTEL ENTERPRISES, INC. BATTERIES 191.65
01124 ARTHUR CLEKEN, INC. TREE IMPLANTS 2!6.72
02261 ASSOCIATED A?TkACTIONS ENT.INC 4TH OF JULY PARADE 22~.00
FLOATS-4TH OF JULY 200~.00
02270 AT&T SERVICE 2.63
SERVICE ~ .78
SERVICE i'.57
SERVICE 6.78
SERVICE 33.38
SERVICE ~.78
SERVICE 13.17
SERVICE 22.84
SERVICE u.03
SERVICE 31.62
SERVICE IvL29
SERVICE !74.78
SERVICE '- 122.~2 '' '
REPORT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY J~L1201 13:02 PAGE 2
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESF~ED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRC~JUNE 29 2001 TO JULY 12 2001
DENT VENDOR NBR VEMDOR NEME INVOICE DESC~INTION AMOO~T
SERVICE 7.03
627.10
05044 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM RENTAL 659.69
06162 BADGE-A-MINIT FIRE SAFETY SUPPLIES 211.80
04414 BARTLETT TREE ~PERTS FERTILIZATION PARANAY TREE 214.16
06175 BLACKIEEMIEC BAND AGENT FEE 200.00
05051 BLUE SAINTS PARADE BARD 1200.00
06141 BLUE STARS 4TH OF JULY PAP~DE 1000.00
01001 BURRELL, STEVE REIMBURSEMENT 49.00
01008 BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS FLORAL ARP~ANGEMENT 41.00
F~OMAL ARRANGEMENT 58.50
!05.50
01011 C4 IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC. METER CHARGE 46.60
05268 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEARING SUPPLIES 1652.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES 251.17
CLEANING SUPPLIES 25!.17
CLEANING SUPPLIES 251.16
2405.50
06149 CAIk~S, CONRAD RF~L ESTATE TAR WEBATE 276,00
06150 CASEMAN, JOHN R. SUBSCRIPTION 47.00
01046 CAVALIERS DRUM & BUGLE CORP. NTH OF JULY PARADE 2500.00
01049 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC SCI SERVER BATTERY 1426.Z2
MITSUMI CD-RUM 50.49
CABLE 30.49
PRINTERS 1616.11
KEYBOARD 40.00
LASBRJET 140.00
TDK CD-R MEDIA !98.00
OFFICE EQBIP, 2!5.00
OFFICE EQUIP. 30.45
3799.36
01056 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY BAKERY 27.17
05375 CENTURY CLEANERS UNIFORM CLEAN 48.62
UNIFORM CLEARING 6!.75
!!0.37
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 3
R~L~ASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MO[~NT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~O~ JU~E 29 200t TO JULY I2 2001
REPT VENDOR NBR VF/~DOR ~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~O~T
01069 CHH RITE PRODUCTS C~PANY CLEANING SUPPLIES 342.48
CLEANING SUPPLIES 93.64
CLEANING SUPPLIES 93.67
CLEANING SUPPLIES 93.64
CL~A~ING SUPPLIES 93.64
717.07
01097 CINTAS CORP UNIFO~ EXPENSE 36.00
CL~NING SERVICES 134.17
170.17
05857 CITt CARDS AOL SERVICE 21.95
01103 CITIZENS WATER R~SOURCES SERVICE t08.94
01113 CLASSLINE, INC. PACKET ID-CHIEF 43.00
01118 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL FOR - 071201 700.00
PAYROLL FOR - 071201 190.00
890.00
01147 CC~ONWFf~LTH EDISON SERVICE-JUNE 10118.11
01153 CO~{UNITY CAB CO. SENIOR TAXI RIDES 478.30
05574 COSTELLO, ELAINE SENIOR EXERCISE CLASS 375.00
05061 DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES DBT ONLINE AUTO TARCK 115.00
01267 DICK CARLTON ASSOCIATES 4TH OF J~LY PARADE 2600.00
01298 DRAWING BOARD INC. ENVELOPES & LABELS 156.56
01303 DREISILKER ELECTRIC EOTORS,INC ~PLACEMENT V-BELTS 32.18
REPLACEMENT V-BELTS 32.18
64.36
01332 ELGIN FIRE DEPAR?MENT REGISTRATION 900.00
01333 ELGIN REGIONAL FIRE ACADEMY GRADUATION LUNCHEON 32.00
06078 ELM MAINTENANCE SERVICES REHAE WOE< 5!35.00
01339 ELTON CORPORATION REPAIR PAMTS 214.62
05154 5~SAK CHICAGO/MILWAUKEE REPAIR OF A.~]BULANCE COTS 325.00
06160 ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR RENTAL OF 5 CARS 3195.00
06188 ERiKSEN, JAMES REIMS SHOES 83.30
01372 FAST~H~%K, FREESTYLE TRICK TEAM 4TH OF JULY PARADE 475.00
REPORT: APBOAMDRPT GENERATED: t REP O0 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 4
RELRARE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOURI PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 29 2001 TO JULY 12 2001
DEFT VENDOR REM VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCIflPTION AMOUNT
01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS COMP AIRBILL 17.62
FED EX SERVICE 22.60
OVEREIGHT SHIPMENT 7.80
FED EJ< CHARGES 15.76
63.78
00329 FELL, JUDITH B. SUFRLFES-VOLUNTEEX PARTY 112.86
EN~ENTAINMENT 250.00
FILM PROCESSING 89.90
452.76
00102 FIRE PENSION FUND PAYROLL FOR - 071201 14925.55
01422 FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, IRC TRAVEL & LABOR 112.00
TRAVEL & LABOR 1837.00
TI{~VEL & LABOR 418~00
2367.00
01446 FULTON CONTRACTING CO. SIREN MAINTENANCE 1966.00
04991 G & M INC. SIDEWALK IMPFOV~ENT PROORAES 1218.78
SIDEWALK IMREOV~ENT PROGRAi48 39391.79
CONCRETE RESTORATION 5308.15
45918.72
04537 GALETON GLOVES GOLD CHORE GLOVES 165.35
01480 GERAAXD AND COMPANY SUPPLIES 566.00
01502 GLOBAL FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. SAW CNTTE~ EDGE 61.72
01505 GNASTRE, R~IGIA REAL ESTATE TAX REBATE 252.00
06180 OOREING, BRIAN ICE-4TH OF JULY 9.12
06158 GOLF, WITTER REPLACENENT FLOOR 107.47
06153 REEDELL, EXTHRYN E. REAL ESTATE TAX REBATE 418.00
06143 GULF COAST DBC 4TH OF JULY PARADE 1250.00
06183 HALPER, GREGORY S!DL'IALK FROG 35.00
01555 NANEY AND SONS, B. INC. DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS 212.50
01558 RANSEN ASSOCIATES MO~HLY SERVICE 415.10
MONTHLY SERVICE 100.00
MOETHLY SERVICE 280.89
795.99
04055 HARRIS EQUIPMENT $EXVICE SHOP AIR COMPRESSOR 251.98
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 t3:02 PAGE 8
RELL~SE tD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARN OF TRUSTEES F~OR 4UNE 29 2001 TO ~ULY 12 2001
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCR~PTFON AMOUNT
01578 EENDRICKSEN, ROBERT W. RERK~AY TREE TRt~flNG 19310.00
PARE~AY TREE REMOVALS 13138.00
32448.00
01580 HENRICKSEN & COMPANY, INC. OFFICE FURE 6469.50
06042 HOFFMANN, MICHAEL REIMBURS~ENT 50.00
01609 HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER PRE-~PLOYMENT PHYSICALS 796.00
PHYS-S. ROSCO 175.00
PHYSICAL 242.00
PRE-~PLOYi~ENT PHYSICALS 548.00
1711.00
01650 ICMA M~EK-JASON LEIB 40.00
00107 IC/~A RETII{F2~ENT TRUST - 407 PAYROLL FOR - 071201 15554.13
01664 ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF POLICE REGISTRATION 185.00
01669 ILLINOIS CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSOC. JANONIS/STD, HL/LEIB 507.75
00108 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PAYROLL FOR - 071201 20877.32
01689 ILLINOIS GFOA AD-ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR 100.00
01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. PAPER 664.90
01122 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSL~ENT UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 071201 357.69
PAYROLL FOR - 071201 195.50
RYROLL FOR - 0~1201 126.00
PAYROLL FOR - 071201 60.00
PAYROLL FOR - 071201 520.75
1259.94
01712 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE BACKGROUND CFECK 38.00
01747 ISA REGISTER/CLARK 350.00
01828 JANDRIS, MAUk~ CONFERONCE 966.00
00353 JARONIS, MICHAEL E. LUNCH/MEETING 46.93
BREAKFAST/MEETiNG 32.63
79.56
00354 JANOMICK, TIMOTHY ROIMDURREMEN~ 29.77
01772 JESSE ~THITE T~DLER~ 4TH OF OULY PARADE 800.00
01783 JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS AD-IN~76529 460.00
01794 ~LE UNIFORMS, INC. UNIFORN SUPPLIES 80S.25
REPORT: APBOABDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 REN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 6
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRC~ JUNE 29 2001 TO JULY 12 2001
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRf~TION
01796 Kk~ CONSTRUCTION IHDA-246 RATLEN 5090.00
01801 KAN PRODUCTS INC SUPP/DRILL BITS 187.88
06152 KAR~, CHRIS P~I~URS~NT 32.46
06100 KEANE, JOHN FOOD SUPP 52.12
REIMBURS~ENT 259.60
311.72
01811 REEFER'S PHARMACY ~DICAL SUPPLIES 163.20
06164 ~LLY SERVICES, INC. DATA ENTRY SERVICES 686.88
01819 KIEFT BROTHERS INC. SPACER RING 621.00
06145 KIMBALL MID'ST AL~INUM CLEANER 298.01
01827 KLEIN, THORPE AHD JENKINS,LTD. LEGAL SERVICES 22992.91
06185 KLYMHO, BETHANY SODA SUFE 19.74
06154 KNAPCIH, KEITH REBATE 175.00
02960 LAKE COUi~IY MOUNTED POSSE 4TH OF JULY PARADE 350.00
06036 LEIDER GARDEN CENTER FLOWERS 1341.60
05176 LIBERTY FLAG & SPECIALTY CO. SUPPLIES 1698.07
SUPPLIES 675.00
2373.07
01897 LIFE ASSIST ENBULANCE SUPP 177.15
06177 LOWE, THONAS R/E TRANSFER REBATE 510.00
06186 ~C'S SPECIALTY MACHINE INC. TRENCHER 375.00
01948 MANAGE~I. BNT CONCEPTS CONSTRHCTION INSPECTION 351!.65
05021 MEHARDS PL~BING REPAIR SUPPLIES 08.15
FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES 34.47
SUPPLIES FLASHLIGHTS 63.88
188.50
00116 METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PAYROLL FOR - 071201 055.08
00117 ME?ROFOLITAN ALLIANCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 071201 570.00
02826 MICHAEL WAGNER & SONS, INC. SENAGE P~P 315.70
PL~BING REPAIR SUPPLIES 92.89
408.59
REPOT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: t SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 7
RSLRASE tD :
VILL%GE OF MOUN~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILRE P~ESE~TED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~UN ~NE 29 2001 TO ~LY 12 2001
DEBT VENDO~ NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESC~PTIUN ~
02046 MOBILE PRIN~ INC. BUSINESS CADS/NOTE PADS 293.63
~O DADS-FINAMCE 126.06
419.69
06142 MODEL "a" RESTORERS CLUB 4TH OF ~JLY PARADE 450.00
06182 MOSHER, LEONARD SIDEWALK PROG 35.08
02066 MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF CO~ERCE NITWORKING SESSION 280.00
02067 MU~NT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SDO. AUGUST PM~ 3333.33
05049 ~. PROSPECT C(]~(UNITY EAND 4TB OF JULY PARADE 300.00
06159 MUTZABAUGH, TIM REIMbUrSEMENT 50.00
06179 NALIWAJKO, WALTER 4 SQ PUBLIC WALK i40.00
00123 NATIONWIDE PAYROLL FOR - 071201 1680i.18
02155 NEX~EL CO~NWICATIUNS SERVICE 167.40
SERVICE 461.56
628.96
05256 NICOR ENERGY CHARGES 4555.42
02170 NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRVG TRAINING 985.00
02182 NORTHER~ I~LINOIS POLICE ALARM SYST~ LANGUAGE LINE 15.00
02189 IIOP, THW~ST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED 34714.86
SERVICES RENDERED 8678.72
43393.58
02190 NORTHWEST CO~/~UNITY EMS DEPT ADWINISTRATIVE FEE 3535.88
02194 NORTHWEST FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 689.55
STAGE CO2 REGULATB~ !1!.50
FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET 21.95
INSTALL FiRE EET!!iGUISREH 4.50
797.50
02210 N~HERS AUTOMATION INC SERVICE INVRST!GAiiVE 4-'..98
04892 DO~ TECHNOLOGY SYST~S GOLD SICICONE 2335.62
02238 ON TIME ~SSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY 47.00
06170 P.C.R. NOTARY PRO, LTD. NOTARY BOND 55.00
06033 PADDOCK ~UBLICATIONS AD =9=.00
02256 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, iNC. WAGE PUBLICATioN ~ -34.81 '
REPORT: APBOARDR~ GENE~TSD: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUM: THURSDAY ~L1201 13:02 PAGE 8
RELINE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRESENIED TO THE ~ OF TRUSTEES FRO~ JUNE 29 2001 TO ~L¥ 12 2001
DEP? VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
06181 PA~ASKEVOPOULOS, AMGE50 4 SQ PUBLIC WALK 140.00
05321 PANI3LA, GENE ~FOND 900.00
02299 RET~AK, FRANK ~I~URSLXENT-CDL 50.00
REIMBURSLXENT-SAFETY SHOES 85.00
135.00
02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISCELLANEOUS 6.80
MISCELLANEOUS 19.59
MISCELLAMEO~S 69.31
MISCELLAMEOOS 16.00
MISCELk~NEOUS 67.59
MISCELLANEOUS 8.55
MISCELLANEOUS 57.52
MISCELLANEOUS 15.00
MISCELLANEOUS 15.00
MISCELLAMDOUS 12.75
MISCELLANEOUS 1.00
MISCELLANEOUS 8.80
MISCELLANEOUS 18.55
MISCELLANEOUS 7.34
MISCELLANEOUS 74.51
MISCELLANEOUS 10.30
MISCELLANEOUS 8.16
MISCELLANEOUS 3.17
MISCELLANEOUS 0.24
MISCELLANEOUS 1.62
MISCELLANEOUS 2.46
MISCELLANEOUS 15.85
MISCELLAMEOUS 0.68
MISCELLANEOUS 12.19
MISCELLANEOUS 6.12
MISCELLANEOUS 2.96
MISCELLANEOUS I1.22
473.28
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS T~AVEL & SUPPLIES 36.47
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 2.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 122.07
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 5.26
TI{iVEL & SUPPLIES 28.09
!93.89
02315 PIONEER PRESS TRAASUNRS REPORT 461.60
02323 POLICE ~EC. RESEARCH FORUM MEMREP~HIP DUES 300.00
06189 POLICE FUTURISTS INTERNATIONAL MUMEERSHIP DUES 40.00
00124 POLICE PENSION FUND PAYROLL FOR - 071201 19487.11
04921 .. POPE, ELIZABETH A. PAYROLL FOR - 071201 923.08
REPORT: APBOAMDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 9
RELEASE ID :
VIL~RE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRON JUNE 29 2001 TO JULY 12 2001
DEPT VENDOR RER VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
06155 POI]LOS, MARC & VICTORIA PEAL ESTATE TAX REBATE 664.00
02338 PRAIRIE BRASS BAMD 4TH OF JULY PARADE 1200.00
02341 PRECISION MNTALS, INC. HARDWARE FOR ENTRY DOOR 67.00
06148 PRECISION MIDWEST REPAIR 175.00
02352 PRINCETON THC UNIFO~ EXPENSE 35.94
05605 PRINT TWERAMOOND INC. PAPER FOR NEWSLETTER 13860.00
02362 PROSPECT BAND BOOSTERS AD IN AD BOOK 100.00
02363 PROSPECT MARCHING KiqlGHTS 4TH OF O~LY PARADE 1000.00
06172 PUROFIRET DEBRIS RiP,OVAL 165.00
06176 QUIET STO~ PARADE BAND 000.00
02394 RAYOO SI]PPLIES 334.00
VINYL STOCK 192.50
527.00
02396 RAYI{ARA OFFICE PROD & FURE ACT.321000 FIRE 163.11
ACT ~321000 FiRE 442.96
606.07
03910 REAL ESTATE INDEX INC. TITLE SEARCH 120.00
02399 REBEL'S TROPHIES, INC. PLAQUES 160.50
RETIP~iENT Pk~QUES 343.38
003.08
02401 RED WING SHOE STORE SAFETY SHOES PURCHASE 85.00
02~17 RENTOKIL - $OBUREAN RAiNTENANCE 687.30
00414 RICHARDSON, BORALD RE!MBURSEMEXT 40.00
CARE 75.10
115.15
00418 ROSCOP, WILL!AN RE!MBURSREENT 24932
02484 SALTY RAEXN CORPORATION CLUING SERVICE t12.85
04673 SAN BEREARDINO COUNTY CHILD SUPRORT pAY14BNTS PAYROLL FOR - 071201 200.13
00125 REiU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 071201 541.86
02531 REMLER INDUSTRIES INC. RSNTOCi{!ND FEE 47.74
REPORT: APBOARDBPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY J~L1201 13:02 PAGE 10
RELFASN tD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM ~UNE 29 2001 TO J~LY 12 2001
...................................................................................... T ............................................
DE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR N~ INVOICE DRSCt~IPTIUN AMOUNT
...................................................................................................................................
04908 SITKO, LEONARD 8 SQ PUBLIC WALK 280.00
02632 STERLING CODIFIERS, INC. BUILDING CODE BOOKS 135.00
00441 STRAHL, DAVID REGISTRATION 1476.34
02658 SU~URBA~ P~KS ENVELOPES 99.00
06184 SWEENEY, GREG SIDE~ALK PROG 35.00
02672 SYST~S FOEMS, INC. SUPPLIES 196.90
06163 SZABO'S ~ASUNRY S~RLING SRAL WALLS/PUBLIC WORKS 9820.00
02679 TEE JAY SERVICE COMNA}~Y, INC. SERVICE 164.00
02680 TELET~C, INC. AVL CHARGES 1213.95
05378 THE SMILE PLACE JACKETS E~BROIDERED 90.00
02691 THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS SERVICES ~NDFRED 60.00
SERVICES RENDERED 60.00
ELEVATOR ~INSPECTIONS 99.00
SERVICES RENDERED 60.00
279.00
06191 THUNSON LFJ~{NING ~DBOOKS 483.32
01291 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR ~INTENANCE 196.29
02704 TOPCUN MID,ST ~ARKING PAINT & SUPPLIES 344.40
02723 TRITON ELECTRONICS, INC. ~DAR REPAIE 81.50
06171 T~EETER HC~E GROUP PANASONIC 99.99
04813 UNITED RENTAL HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES BARRICADE RENTAL 151.08
00127 UNITED WAY PAYROLL FOR - 071201 303.85
06088 VAREEM, ~RE REIMBURSEMENT 50.00
05004 VERIZON WIRELESS PAGER RENTA~ 22.45
06178 VETTER, ED 2 SQ PUBLIC WALK 70.00
02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC.OFFiCE SUPPLIES 40.63
BROTHER 1270 PRINTER 53.46
94.09
00128 VIL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 071201 16875.40
PAYROLL FOR - 071201 29.96
16905.36
REPORT: APBOANREPT GREERATED: I REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 11
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PKOSRECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESERVED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUN JUNE 29 2001 TO ~LY 12 2001
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NANE INVOICE DESCRi~TIOW AROUNT
04314 VILLAGE OF MORET PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 071201 183589.20
PAYROLL FOR - 071201 17458.20
PAYROLL FOR - 071201 14180.88
215228.28
02819 VITAL ~CORD BREC, INC. MICROFILMING SERVICES 811.75
01228 W.S DARLEY & CO. SAFETY GOGGLES 44.46
02832 WAI/~ANT CO~ITY BRC FIAN PROCESSING 20.79
FILM PROCESSING & SUPPLIES 12.45
33.24
04057 WEST GROUP PA~ENT CENTER ILLINOIS COMPILED STATUES 162.00
05476 WOW ~%AG ~ DECORETING CO. SUPPLIES 450.00
SUPPLIES 42!.57
87!.57
06156 WINANS, DIANE REBATE 406.00
05746 WISCTF PAYROLL FOR - 071201 455.54
02893 WOLF CANREA, INC. FILM PROCESSING 136.62
02896 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING 324.00
05410 WORLDCUN WIRELESS, INC. CELLULAR SERVICE ESDA 17.34
06107 WOSZ, K~VIN OVERPAYMENT 10.00
00464 HULBECRER, JEFFREY CLOTHING ALLOW 39.29
REFEREES 308.62
347.91
TOTAL : 618886.69
030
01639 ANERICAN NATIONAL BANK TIPPING FEES 73619.64
FIXED COSTS 41712.26
1!533i.90
02270 AT&T SERVICE 3.51
02406 ANREIG PACIFIC COWPANY RECYCLING BINS 2805.00
TOTAL : 1!8140.41
030
01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. T~FF!C SIGNAL F~iNTREANCE -560.00
02167 ARROW ROaD CONSTRUCTION ~SURFACING PROJ 59351.23
REPORT: ARBOARDRPT GENE~TED: 1 SER 00 07:17 RUN: TBURSDAY JUL1201 13:82 RAGE 12
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ JUNE 29 2001 TO JULY 12 2001
DER VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ANOONT
01147 C6%~4ONWEALTB EDISON STREET LIGHTING 2831.52
01184 COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR REPL TRAFFIC 22854.44
TOTAL 85597.19
07O
01021 CAMPFIRE BOYS AND GIRLS BILLING FOR MAY/JUNE 3000.00
01114 CLAYGROUND, INC. MILLING FOR JAN-JUNE 01 2000.00
06161 CLi~i~-CUT L.5.C. BILLING FOR COMPLNTION/CDBG 11241.00
04007 CONEY, NANCY CASH ADVANCE 500.00
03938 DAVIDSMEYRE BUS SERVICE, INC. SOI~ER ADVENTURE BUSES 1267.35
00335 FOLEY, ARRIL B. SUPRLIES FOR RARADE 10.98
SUPPLIES FOR PARADE 5.94
SUPRLIES FOR PARADE 18.00
SUPRLIES FOR PARADE 12.98
SUPRLIES FOR RARANE 2.56
50.46
06003 MOUNT PROSPECT PARE DISTRICT R~NTAL USE-LIONS PARK 300.00
TOTAL 18358.81
290
06147 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK&TRUST CO. BOND PRINCIPA~ DUE 215000.00
BOND INTEREST DUE 147331.25
362331.25
TOTAL 362331.25
510
04615 F~NK C. CLEMENTS, PRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5024.71
04991 G & M !NC. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT ?NOGP~S 2540,70
04606 K~OX COMPANY ~OX BOX 136.00
05709 MEADE ELECTRIC CO. INC. STREET LIGHT PROJECT 84558.68
02064 MOTOROLA, INC. LAPTOP COMROTERS/RAD!O MODEMS 18933.00
06187 WOLFF CLEMENTS & ASSOCIATES SITE ~4 3640.68
SITE #5 2261.64
SITE #9 2837.11
8739.43
TOTAL 130732.52
· REPORT: APBOARDRPT G~ERATED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 13
REL~{SE tD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS P~ES~ED TO THE ~AR~ OF TRUSTEES FR~ ~7]NE 29 2001 TO ~7]I~Y I2 2001
DE~T VENDOR NUN VENDOR Nk~ INVOICE DESCR~TDON MOUNT
550
01377 FEDERA~ ~XP~SS CORP AIREILA 14.96
02521 SDI CONSULTANTS LTD. SUPP AGREE~EN~ 3225.38
PROJ G00027 12699.75
15925.13
TOTAL 15940.09
560
02167 a~o~ ROAD CONSTRUCTION ST~ET ~CONST.PRG 177116.34
177116.34
610
05222 k~ERICAN INDUSTRIA~ UNIFO~ CLL{NING 271.20
01620 A~ERIC~2: ~ANDSCAPING INC. PA~AY ~STO~TION 1809.40
PA~AY RESTO~TION 1319.70
3129.10
01780 ~RITECH SEUICE 47.50
00372 ~DLER, GLEN ~IMBVES~ENT 114.15
01124 ~THUR CLESEN, INC. ~ING PAINT 237.60
02270 AT&T SERVICE 234.50
02451 BA~ER METER INC WATER METERS 5735.61
06165 BLAZY, BURTON ~ND 25.76
05375 CENTURY CL~ERS UNIFO~ CLE~ 48.63
UNIFO~ CLEWING 61.75
110.38
01059 CENTURY ~iN AID SPRINKLER NOZZLE 42.98
01097 CINTAS CORP VEST & JACKETS 238.90
01147 CO~ONWEALTH EDISON ENERGY CHARGES 4863.18
ENERGY CHARGES 34.50
4897.68
01283 DIXON ENGINEERING PDFESSIONAL SERVICES 4005.00
01323 EAST JORD~ IRO~O~S HYDD~TS 9~85.00
050~7 ELGIN SNREPING SERVICES, INC. INLET CLUING 2010.00
04216 ENG!NEE~D FILL SYSTEMS ~SH FILL i106.1~
P,E~RT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 SRS 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY ~L1201 13:02 PAGE 14
VELRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF HILLS PRESENTED TO THE DOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ JNNE 29 2001 TO ~LY 12 2001
...................................................................................... t ............................................
VE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICH DESCRIPTION MOUNT
...................................................................................................................................
01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP CO{]RIER CHARGES 119.68
01436 FUEDRIKSEN & SONS ~XTINGUISHEVE RECHARGED 24.00
01546 HACE COMPANY SERVICE 203.50
06174 HAYES PEASE GROUP VEFU~D WATER BILL 7.12
01544 HBK WATER METER SERVICE LABOR AND MATERI~S 2551.55
01580 HENRICKSEN & COMPANY, INC. REPL DRAF~ TABLE 557.49
01819 KIEF~ BROTHERS INC. VALVE VAULTS 730.08
VALVE VAULTS 333.78
1063.86
06166 KUNZ, JR. PHILLFU REFUND 3.56
02042 MINUTE]liN PRESS STREET LIGHT 1069.53
02136 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL M~BERSNIP RENEWAL 200.00
06173 OAK TERACE APTS REFUND 263.01
02256 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. PUBLICATION OF HID NOTICE 33.72
06167 PAULKEN, MICHAEL REFUND 77.14
02962 VEDWDOD APT. PARTNERS REFUND 24.50
06168 TAYLOR, KEVIN R~FUND 70.22
02773 U.S. BANK TRUST WATER 143445.00
pOWER 10898.00
O&M 16393.00
FIXED 95123.00
265859.00
02735 U.S. FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP PARTS 999.00
L/P SLEEVE 30!.00
i300.00
02749 UNITED BUSINESS ~CH!NES CHARGES FOR DELIVERY 5.11
02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE WATER BILLING POSTAGE DEPOSIT 5000.00
06190 VIGGIANO, LISA VEIMB SHOES 37.88
02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 344.12
01522 W.W. GRAINGEH INC. CO~ERSIAL MOTOR !68.95
06169 WANL~D, ED REFUND 3.70 ' '
· REPORT: APBOARDRPT GUNERATED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 15
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRE~ JUNE 29 2001 TO J~LY 12 2001
DEUT VENDOR NBR VKEOOR NAME INVOICE DESCR~UTIUN AMOUNT
TUTA~ : 311176.13
630
01147 CC~ON~;LktTH EDISON ENERGY CHARGES 129.25
02754 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD I~ND LRASE-~NE 2097.21
TOTAL : 2226.46
660
02270 AT&T SERVICE 13.I8
02318 AUTO CLUTCH ~ FILTERS 238.27
02940 BRAKE ALIUN CO,RANT BRAKE CAM 245.26
BRAKE CAM 49.00
294.26
01039 CARQUEUT ARLINGTON EGTS PARTS 148.30
01289 ~OUGL~S TRUCK PARTS PARTS 476.74
05579 RAMHUEST LINCOLN MERCURY AB-TRANSMITTER 87.50
05006 FINRNINER EQUIPMENT CO. PARTS 192.35
03958 FREUND INTERNATIONAL REPAIR PARTS 354.54
BUSHING/WASHER 73.86
WASHER/P~P/VALVE 23.72
452.12
01511 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES TIRES 538.08
01725 INLARD DETROIT DEISEL-ALLIEDN FILTER 548.20
01999 METRO ENVIRONMENTAL CONTR,INC. SERVICE CALL FOR NMPAIE8 375.00
02042 MINUT~N PRESS FORMS 906.42
02194 NORTHWEST FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 659.55
05008 RUNNION EQUIPMENT CO. ANNUAL OSHA CRANE iNSPECTION 564.50
CHANGE HYDRAULIC OiL & FILTER 82.59
647.09
02578 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL SAFETY MIRE TWIST KIT !94.25
02684 TERP~CE SUPPLY C~RANT CYLINDER RENTAL 10.76
05004 VREIZON WIRELESS PAGING SERVICE 45.01
TOTAL: 5827.08
670
RE~RT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:t7 R~: THURSDAY JULi201 13:02 PAGE 16
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 29 2001 TO JULY 12 2001
DE~T VENDOR NBR V~DOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION MOUNT
05579 ELMHURET LINCOLN MERCURY FA'TENDED WAEDANTY-2001 FORD 17490.00
02525 SECRETARY OF STATE LICENSE PLATE/TITLE 143.00
LICENSE PLATE/TITLE 80.00
223.00
TOTAL 17713.00
680
01049 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC PRINTER & CABLE 793.99
TOTAL 793.99
690
01102 CITIBANK, N.A. PET INS CLAIMS-GAB 4442.80
INS CLAIMS-GAB 5632.28
10075.08
01306 DRUG CARD, INC. CARD CLAIMS 13026.26
01451 GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. CLAIMS A~IIN 1472.10
01737 INTERGOVED/~ENTAL PER.MEN.COOP INSURANCE 7586.52
INSURANCE 65072.45
INSURANCE 1813.60
INSURANCE 144676.58
219149.15
01966 ~.RTIN BOYER COMPANY, INC W/C Ck~IMS-JUN 01 9321.58
W/C CLAIMS ADMIN. 3000.00
12321.58
04984 THOMAS, VIRGINIA REIMB PRESCRIP 17.37
02899 WROBE5, HALINAE. VEHICLE REPAIR 125.00
TOTAL 256186.54
790
06151 CRANDALL, SEERYL K. OVERPAYMENT !0.00
00319 DOOBEK, RICHARD SOUND EQUIPMENT 943.79
01739 !HTO×IMETERS, INC. INTOXBL/iR K~YPAD 9000.08
FREIGHT CHARGES 54.92
9054.92
01719 NCPERS GROUP LIFE PARMIUMFORJULY 252.00
02689 THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT BOND MONEY 1300.00
BOND MONEY 1850.00
BOND MONEY 970.00
· REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 17
REL~E ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILI~ PRESRETED TO TEE BOAD OF TRUSTEES FRC~ J~NE 29 2001 TO J~LY 12 2001
RE~T VF/~DOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT
BOND MONEY 3609.00
7934.00
02722 TRI-STATE ELECTRONIC COR~ ELECTRONIC PARTS 25.63
TOTAL 18220,34
GP~ND TOTAL 2138446.84
REPORT: NUBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1201 13:02 PAGE 18
RELEASE ID :
VILk~GE OF MOUNT PROSPEC?
LIST OF BILLS PRESEh'TED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRO~ J~E 29 2001 TO J~LY 12 2001
SUMMARY BY FUND
00I GENERAL ~I~D 618086.69
030 REFUSE DISPOSk% FU~D 118140.41
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 85597.19
870 CO~UNITY D~VELM~T BLOCK GRET 18358.81
290 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 362331.25
510 CAPITAL IMPROVL~ENT FUND 138732.52
558 DOWNTOWN REDEVRE~t~T CONST 15940.09
560 STREET IMPROV~RET COHST FUND 177116.34
610 ~ATER AND S~ER FUND 311176.I3
638 PANKING SYST~ REVENUE MD 2226.46
660 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 5827.08
670 VEHICLE REPLAC~NT FUND 17713.00
680 COMPUTER REPLAC~E~ FUND 793.99
690 RISK PANAGL~EN~ FUND 256186.54
798 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 18220.34
TOTAL: 2138446.84
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET REVENUE
&
EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES
January 1 - June 30, 2001
o~n~/200i VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 80.0% ) Completed
~:~:58 Budget ReVenue Sulmllary 6 Months ( 50.06 > Re~aining
' os/o~/o~ , 06/~o/o~
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
REVENUE BY CLASSIFICATION
PROPERTY TAXES 29,958 4,461,691 10,101,003 5,639,312 55.8
OTHER TAXES 1,175,059 9,176,988 17,626,375 8,449,387 47.9
LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 92,433 2,175,093 3,085,900 910,807 29.5
INTERSOVERMENT REV. 542,082 3,825,658 10,648,066 6,822,408 64.1
CHARGES FOR SERVICE 1,049,114 6,025,561 12,861,980 6,836,419 53.2
FINES AND FORFEITS 18,068 199,294 510,000 310,706 60.9
INVESTMENT INCOME 1,585,069 2,047,619 5,335,687 3,288,068 61.6
REIMBURSEMENTS 62,927 240,882 602,656 361,774 60.0
OTHER REVENUE 126,127 1,886,373 3,144,308 1,587,938 49.6
OTEER FINANCING SOURCES 160,493 1,091,865 17,351,970 16,260,105 93.7
Total All Funds 4,841,330 30,831,024 81,267,945 60,436,921 62.1
o~/~/2o0~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~3,3~,s8 Budget Revenue Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 11,365 69,088 132,099 63,011 47.7
RISK MJ%NAGEMENT FUND 305,750 1,855,574 3,785,640 1,930,066 51.0
POLICE PENSION FUND 812,434 951,352 2,929,601 1,978,249 67.5
FIRE PENSION FUND 658,586 1,059,748 3,022,180 1,962;432 64.9
BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 235 1,788 5,000 3,212 64.2
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND -13,896 0 0 0
SSA $1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA $6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 381 20,120 39,625 19,508 49.2
Total All Funds 4,841,330 30,831,024 81,267,945 50,436,921 62.1
07/11/2001 6 Months ( S0.0% ) Completed
13:38:15 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM02~ Budget Revenue by C&~6~ Within Fund Summary
" 01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
0~/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~3:38:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01 .'
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B 3,530 250,371 565,866 315,495 55.8
G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 10,400 10;400 100.0
49 OTMER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 2,273,500 2,273,800 100.0
TOTkLG. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,283,900 2,283,900 100.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPWNT B&I 1993A
41 OT~ER TAXES 0 181,702 370,000 188,298 50.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,937 11,388 21,635 10,247 47.4
49 OTNER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 --
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 1,937 193,090 391,635 198,548 50.7
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B
41 OTMER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 --
TOTAL DOWNTOWN RED~VLOPMNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 68,752 140,000 71,248 50.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 346 2,270 4,482 2,212 49.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 __
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 346 71,022 144,482 73,460 50.8
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 26,028 53,000 26,972 50.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 77 393 962 569 59.1
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 77 26,421 53,962 27,541 51.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,721 15,247 16,164 917 5.7
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 300,000 300,000 0 --
TOTAL DOWNTOWN RHD~VL B & ! 1999 2,721 315,247 316,164 917 0.3
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A
41 OTHER TAXES 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME -450
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A -450
REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1998B
41 OTRER TA/fES 22,412 143,575 276,000 i32,425 48.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 749 4,261 9,899 5,638 57.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
13:~8:15 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMO2f Budget Revenue by cat~g0~ within Fund Summary
" 01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTALREFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993R 23,161 147,836 285,899 138,063 48.3
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 13,398 85,833 165,000 79,167 48.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 345 2,077 4,772 2,695 56.5
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL E&I 1994A 13,743 87,910 169,772 81,862 48.2
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES 16,711 107,057 205,800 98,743 48.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 419 2,471 5,652 3,181 56.3
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&i 1996A 17,130 109,528 211,452 101,924 48.2
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 5,522 35,373 68,000 32,627 48.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 60 371 1,609 1,238 76.9
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 5,582 35,744 69,609 33,865 48.7
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 74,793 152,300 77,507 50.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 287 2,058 3,318 1,260 38.0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 287 76,851 155,618 78,767 50.6
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 56,598 362,578 697,000 334,422 48.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 171 2,554 6,761 4,207 62.2
TOTAL NPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 56,769 365,132 703,761 338,629 48.1
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 851 6,384 9,868 3,484 35.3
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 851 6,384 9,868 3,484 35.3
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 41,900 268,422 516,000 247,578 48.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,987 11,440 22,778 11,338 49.8
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 43,887 279,862 538,778 258,916 48.1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A
41 OTMER TAXES 8,666 55,514 106,717 51,203 48.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 265 1,476 4,291 2,815 65.6
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 8,931 86,990 111,008 54,018 48.7
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Re~ining
~3:38,~8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Suaunary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01 .'
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A
41 OTHER T~uXES 31,994 204,958 394,000 189,042 48.0
46 INVSSTMENT INCOME 417 2,301 10,647 8,346 78.4
TOTAL STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 32,411 207,259 404,647 197,388 48.8
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
43 INTERGOVSRMENT REV. 0 250,000 1,753,350 1,503,350 85.7
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 14,016 90,924 60,000 -30,924 -51.5
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 208,197 208,197 100.0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 40,500 40,500 100.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 160,493 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 174,509 661,909 2,704,017 2,042,108 75.8
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME -226 0 0 0 __
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND -226 0 0 0
SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 62,000 62,000 100.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 13,151,500 13,151,500 100.0
TOTAL SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND 0 0 13,213,500 13,213,500 100.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
43 IMTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 746 5,054 4,600 -484 -9.9
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMBNT CONST FUND 746 5,054 4,600 -454 -9.9
DOWNTOWN REDEVLpMNT CONST
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME -46 549 24,000 23,451 97.7
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 18,424 18,424 0 -18,424
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 448,355 925,000 476,645 51.5
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPM~T CONST 18,378 467,328 949,000 481,672 50.8
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
41 OTHER T~-XES 108,321 1,089,633 1,955,923 866,300 44.3
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES ' 5,733 198,700 232,000 33,300 14.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 17,546 106,477 130,000 23,523 18.1
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 131,600 1,394,810 2,317,933 923,123 39.8
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
FRR~RR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0~ ) Re.~ining
SUM02{ Budget Revenue by Cat&~6~within Fund Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 5,457 34,957 67,200 32,243 48.0
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 100.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 13,353 82,421 45,000 -37,421 -83.2
49 OTMER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 18,810 117,378 1,112,200 994,822 89.4
WATERAND SEWER FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 6,082 695,090 1,545,300 850,210 58.0
44 CF~%RGES FOR SERVICE 470,673 2,634,710 6,082,090 3,457,340 56.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 14,492 90,502 151,000 60,498 40.1
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 36,000 36,000 100.0
48 OT~ER RE~ 1,118 12,523 25,000 12,477 49.9
TOTAL WATER AND SEWER FUND 492,365 3,432,825 7,849,350 4,416,525 56.3
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 300 1,800 9,400 3,600 66.7
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 660,000 660,000 100.0
44 C~ARGES FOR SERVICE 13,773 851182 176,000 90,848 ~ 51.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,780 19,912 36,000 16,088 44.7
TOTAL PA~KINO SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 16,853 106,864 877,400 770,536 87.8
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
44 C~Q%RGES FOR SERVICE 95,106 570,652 1,141,301 570,649 50.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 752 5,212 8,000 2,788 34.9
TOTA~VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 95,858 575,864 1,149,301 573,437 49.9
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CF-~RGES FOR SERVICE 66,154 396,923 793,840 396,917 50.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 24,096 157,156 280,000 122,844 43.9
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 22,525 60,000 37,475 62.5
TOTAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 90,250 576,604 1,133,840 557,236 49.1
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 9,962 59,614 117,599 57,985 49.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,403 9,474 14,500 5,026 34.7
TOTAL COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 11,365 69,088 132,099 63,011 47.7
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
43 INTHRGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 5,000 5,000 100.0
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 248,353 1,487,457 2,992,288 1,504,831 50.3
46 IN"J~STMENT INCOME 11,703 77,833 150,000 72,167 48.1
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 10,053 60,000 49,947 83.2
48 OTHER REVENUE 45,694 280,231 578,352 298,121 91.5
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~3:~8:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Stunmary
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 unrecelved Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 805,750 1,855,574 3,785,640 1,990,066 81.0
POLICE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 774,614 384,381 1,760,000 1,375,619 78.2
48 OTHER REVENUE 37,820 566,971 1,169,601 602,630 51.5
TOTAL POLICE PENEION FI/ND 812,434 951,352 2,929,601 1,978,249 67.5
FIRE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 630,141 536,064 1,900,000 1,363,936 71.8
48 OTHER REVENUE 28,445 523,884 1,122,180 598,496 53.3
TOTAL FIRE PENSION FUND 658,586 1,059,748 3,022,180 1,962,432 64.9
BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND
46 I~VESTMENT INCOME 235 1,788 5,000 3,212 64.2
TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 235 1,788 5,000 3,212 64.2
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME -13,896 0 0 0 __
TOTAL ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND -13,896 0 0 0
SSA %1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL SSA %1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 243 19,286 38,125 18,839 49.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 108 834 1,500 666 44.4
TOTAL ESA ~6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 351 20,120 39,625 19,508 49.2
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBR3kRY FUND
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
TOTAL MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4,873,000 4,573,000 100.0
o7n~/2oo~ VILLAGE OF ,MOUNT PROSPECT s Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~:i6,o~ Budget Expenditure Suaunary s Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
ol/oi/0 o6/3o/ol
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION
PEBSONA~ SERVICES 1,403,530 8,816,448 18,758i970 9,942,522 53.0
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 305,188 2,466,498 5,202,344 2,735,846 52.6
OTHER EMFLOYEB COSTS 12,300 134,877 359,100 224,223 62.4
PENSION BENEFITS 287,590 1,702,319 3,661,958 1,959,639 53.5
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,075,330 5,714,821 14,007,454 8,292,633 59.2
%FfILITIBS 4,320 197,163 572,474 375,311 68.6
INSL~CB 680,271 2,029,204 3,780,667 1,751,463 46.3
COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 74,537 522,765 1,352,416 829,651 61.3
OTHER EXPENDITURES 92,030 621,954 1,255,106 633,152 50.4
L~ IMPROVEMENTS 1,400 1,400 240,425 239,025 99.4
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 26,188 66,319 1,668,000 1,601,681 96.0
OFFICE EQUIPMENT 25,875 134,251 434,935 300,684 69.1
MOBILE EQUIPMENT 69,437 568,350 1,500,245 931,895 62.1
OTHER EQUIPMENT 58,321 143,067 568,607 425,540 74.8
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 30,413 79,361 625,509 546,148 87.3
INFRASTRUCTURE 863,011 1,332,488 11,792,532 10,460,044 88.7
BOND PRINCIPAL 12,952 224,658 3,201,880 2,977,222 93~0
INTEREST EXPENSE 6,692 656,206 1,281,762 595,556 47.6
BANK AND FISCAL FEES 3,000 3,600 10,830 7,230 66.8
INTERFURD TR~SFEHS 160,493 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
Total All Fdnds 5,192,848 25,736,734 70,887,184 45,150,450 63.7
EXPENDITURE BY FLrRD
GENERAL FU~D 2,256,696 13,269,594 28,114,309 14,844,715 52.8
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 279,912 1,577,561 3,329,591 1,752,030 52.6
MOTOR FURL TAX FUND 227,110 717,229 2,249,363 1,532,134 68.1
LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 0 6,720 14,863 8,143 54.8
COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GP~NT 6,923 33,561 499,576 465,815 93.3
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 0 47,000 47,000 0
REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I 1993B 300 61,271 589,543 528,272 89.6
G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOP~T B&I 1993A 450 22,597 430,292 407,695 94.7
DO~NTOWN REDEVLDPMNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
DOW~OWI~ REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 450 6,694 163,388 156,694 95.9
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 300 2,344 54,588 52,244 95.7
DOWNTOWN RBDEVL B & I 1999 0 147,631 511,163 363,532 71.1
FLOOD CONTROL B&I i991A 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL B&I t992A 0 0 0 0
HBFL~qDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B 150 28,947 309,624 280,677 90.7
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 150 14,755 179,710 164,955 91.8
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 225 23,568 212,188 188,620 88.9
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 150 8,304 66,908 58,604 87.6
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 300 23,784 152,970 129,186 84.5
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 19,644 326,320 603,854 277,534 46.0
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 0 56,049 112,498 56,449 80.2
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 150 48,276 621,753 573,477 92.2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 225 3,319 156,688 153,369 97.9
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 150 51,300 102,900 51,600 50.1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 86,728 214,541 3,811,843 3,597,302 94.4
o7~i~200~ VILLAGE OF MOIINT PROSPECT 6 Months { 50.0%) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Re~ining
~3:36:0~ Budget Expenditure Su/mnary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended EXpended Budget Balance Percent
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 0 0
SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND 0 0 960,000 960,000 100.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 0 190,666 190,666 100.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 92,163 614,390 1,773,792 1,159,402 65.4
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 542,322 549,689 3,556,917 3,007,228 84.5
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 0 11,765 2,871,942 2,860,177 99.6
WATER AND SEWER FUND 537,046 3,069,934 8,261,305 5,191,371 62.8
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 12,713 73,885 940,895 867,010 92.1
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 88,979 494,437 1,185,389 660,952 87.2
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 86,937 603,350 1,570,245 966,895 61.6
COMPUTER REPI~CEMENT FL~D 11,000 35,461 46,075 10,614 23.0
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 655,378 1,885,539 3,535,903 1,650,364 46.7
POLICE PENSION FWND 139,489 832,635 1,813,738 981,103 54.1
FiRE PENSION FLr~D 143,848 844,218 1,798,075 953,857 53.0
BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 2,960 17,761 35,525 17,764 50.0
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 0 12,305 42,305 30,000 70.9
Total All Funds 5,192,848 25,736,734 70,887,184 45,150,450 63.7
07/11/2001 6 Months ( $0.0% ) Completed
~:3v:38 VILLAGE OF ,MOUNT PROSPECT~ Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRR~BR01
SUMo3i Department Budget EXpenditure Su.mmary
01/oi/0i - 06/30/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 14,535 61,359 91,870 30,511 33.2
03 ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS 1,019 6,600 15,136 8,536 56.4
Totals 15,554 67,959 107,006 39,047 36.5
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,726 15,648 32,359 16,711 51.6
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 374 2,161 4,438 2,277 51.3
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 50 400 350 87.5
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,507 44,391 57,334 12,943 22.6
55 UTILITIES 3 240 425 185 43.5
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 243 3,768 9,550 5,782 60.5
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,701 1,701 2,500 799
Totals 15,554 67,959 107,006 39,047 36.5
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENEP~AL FUND 15,554 67,959 107,006 39,047 36.5
Totals 15,554 67,9E9 107,006 39,047 36.5
07/11/2001 8 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37,38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMos1 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01 ~
CurMo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE MANAGER ' S OFFICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE 34,836 188,085 372,431 184,346 49.5
02 LEGAL SERVICES 43,544 157,762 212,100 54,338 28.6
03 PERSONNEL SERVICES 15,477 77,051 288,903 211,852 73.3
04 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 12,269 88,961 172,832 113,871 65.9
05 PUBLIC INFORMATION 7,089 69,821 161,196 91,375 56.7
Totals 113,215 551,680 1,207,462 655,782 54.3
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 35,946 205,228 520,110 314,882 60.5
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,698 50,824 113,842 63,018 55.4
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 3,850 13,704 41,300 27,596 66.8
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 51,994 245,213 438,270 193,057 44.0
85 UTILITIES 336 1,943 5,220 3,277 62.8
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 476 16,813 36,450 19,637 53.9
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 11,918 17,955 52,270 34,315 65.6
Totals 113,218 551,680 1,207,462 655,782 54.3
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 113,215 551,680 1,207,462 655,782 54.3
Totals 113,215 551,680 1,207,462 655,782 54.3
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
z~:37,z8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMo3~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
" O1/O1/01 06/30/0l
Cur 'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
TV SERVICES DIVISION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 TELEVISION SERVICES 14,367 104,502 165,863 61,361 37.0
03 OTHER SERVICES 0 0 0 0
Totals 14,367 104,502 165,863 61,361 37.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,853 43,875 75,610 31,735 42.0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,011 12,614 23,742 11,128 46.9
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 710 1,507 3,650 2,143 58.7
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,739 8,903 17,961 9,058 50.4
55 UTILITIES 177 2,398 5,800 3,402 58.7
67 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,920 6,993 8,600 1,607 18.7
67 OT~ER EQUIPMF/qT 957 28,212 30,600 2,288 7.5
Totals 14,367 104,602 165,863 61,361 37.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 14,367 104,502 165,863 61,361 37.0
Totals 14,367 104,502 165,863 61,361 37.0
07/11/2001 G Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:3~:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0%)Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMOZl Department Budget Expenditure Su.mmar~r
ol/ol/ol - o6/3o/ol
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE CLERK' S OFFICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/11/2001 S Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months( 50.0%~ Ne~ainlng
FRR~BR01
SUM03~ Depar~m. ent Budge~ Expenditure Sl.mlmary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur 'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 14,682 103;113 219,235 116,122 53.0
02 ACCOUNTING 22,802 146,246 297,268 151,022 50.8
03 DATA PROCESSING 53,236 135,296 208,720 73,424 35.2
04 DUPLICATING SERVICES 1,625 6,482 11,700 5,218 44.6
05 INSURANCE PROGRAMS 19,498 118,599 237,398 118,799 50.0
06 CUSTOMER SERVICES 22,170 152,810 311,297 158,487 50.9
07 CASH MANAGEMENT 2,791 17,995 35,752 17,757 49.7
Totals 136,804 680,541 1,321,370 640,829 48.5
EXPENDITURE CI~SSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 55,466 360,642 741,152 380,510 51.3
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 18,327 96,498 194,277 98,779 50.8
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 203 3,346 10,250 6,904 67.4
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 49,874 113,061 149,485 36,434 24.4
55 UTILITIES 34 2,970 8,150 2,180 42.3
56 INSURANCE 15,186 91,117 182,231 91,114 50.0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 714 9,778 30,950 20,772 68.0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 4,139 8,275 4,136 50.0
Totals 136,804 680,541 1,321,370 6%0,829 48.5
SO%~RCE OF F~S
001 GENERAL FUND 136,804 680,541 1,321,370 640,829 48.5
Totals 186,804 680,561 1,321,370 640,829 48.5
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:30 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
su~031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur-Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 14,819 93,283 186,518 93,235 50.0
02 PLANNING & ZONING 56,399 149,448 246,917 97,469 39.5
03 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4,731 30,956 72,244 41,288 57.2
05 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 46,133 311,222 653,510 342,288 52.4
06 HOUSING INSPECTIONS 19,894 122,370 261,101 138,731 53.1
07 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 7,213 47,690 101,881 54,191 53.2
Totals 149,189 754,969 1,522,171 767,202 50.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 77,421 476,121 1,027,940 551,819 53.7
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 22,952 139,959 291,544 151,585 52.0
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 827 13,235 21,045 7,810 37.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46,142 103,771 136,987 33,216 24.2
55 UTILITIES 1,165 11,790 25,310 13,520 53.4
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 688 6,691 15,745 9,054 57.5
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 3,402 3,600 198 5.5
Totals 149,189 754,969 1,522,171 767,202 50.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 149,189 754,969 1,521,121 766,152 50.4
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMMT CONST 0 0 1,050 1,050 100.0
Totals 149,189 754,969 1,522,171 767,202 50.4
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:~7:3~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~ Months ( S0.0% ) Re~ining
FRRDBR01
SUM0n Department Budget Expenditure Summary
o~/os/o~ - o~/~o/os
Cur'Mo Y~T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CDBG Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Suar~nary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
HUMAN SERVICES Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:~8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRR~BR01
SUM03~ Department Budget EXpenditure Summary
Cur'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Une~qpended Une~pended
POLICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 95,249 953,995 1,899,839 945,844 49.8
02 PATROL & TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 436,109 2,784,339 5,663,405 2,879,064 50.8
03 CRIME PREVTN & PUBLIC SERVICES 16,400 97,590 213,129 115,539 54.2
04 INVESTIGATIVE & JUVENILE PRGM 75,801 460,679 1,020,092 559,413 84.8
05 CROSSING GUARDS 1,047 12,260 23,978 11,718 48.9
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 45,861 309,582 626,364 316,782 50.6
Totals 670,467 4,618,445 9,646,805 4,828,360 51.1
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 492,216 3,076,518 6,252,065 3,175,547 50.8
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 84,131 810,586 1,714,133 903,537 52.7
52 OTHER BMPLOYEE COSTS 1,970 30,257 83,065 52,808 63.6
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85,547 611,472 1,203,989 592,517 49.2
55 UTILITIES 1,355 23,128 57,124 33,996 59.5
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 5,448 41,075 83,591 42,516 50.9
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 19,866 31,313 11,447 36.6
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 5,533 21,525 15,992 74.3
Totals 670,467 4,618,445 9,446,805 4,828,360 51.1
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 670,467 4,611,725 9,431,942 4,820,217 81.1
060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 0 6,720 14,863 8,143 54.8
Totals 670,467 4,618,445 9,446,805 4,828,360 51.1
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:~8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department~-Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01 ,'
Cur'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
FIRE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 57,764 735,529 1,593,036 887,507 53.8
02 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 367,557 2,362,357 5,057,954 2,695,597 53.3
03 FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY 0 701 15,135 14,434 95.4
04 FIRE PREVENTION 28,248 194,150 412,856 218,706 53.0
05 FIRE COMMUNICATIONS 1,154 32,935 53,940 21,005 38.9
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 29,901 194,551 405,090 210,539 52.0
07 EMERGENCY PREPARDENESS PRGM 405 524 15,620 15,096 96.6
08 PAID-ON-CALL PROGRAM 1,436 14,242 32,490 18,248 56.2
Totals 486,465 3,534,989 7,586,121 4,051,132 53.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 372,679 2,456,016 5,272,635 2,816,619 53.4
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 70,212 739,241 1,598,150 818,909 52.6
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 3,121 42,509 125,560 83,051 66.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31,038 202,721 418,621 215,900 51.6
55 UTILITIES 198 24,576 37,150 12,574 33.8
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 5,290 33,988 96,430 62,442 64.8
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 0 5,392 9,000 3,608 40.1
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 5,043 4,200 -843 -30.1
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 3,927 25,503 64,375 38,872 60.4
Totals 486,465 3,534,989 7,586,121 4,051,132 53.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 486,465 3,534,989 7,586,121 4,051,132 53.4
Totals 486,465 3,534,989 7,586,121 4,051,132 53.4
07/11/2001 8 Months ( 50.0% ) Coxpleted
~:~7:~8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months { 50.0% > Remaining
FRR~BR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
" 01/01/01 06/30/01
Cur 'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Une~qpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION Expended Ex~pended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINSTRATION 72,764 469,062 959,712 490,650 51.1
Totals 72,764 469,062 959,712 490,650 51.1
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 12,668 88,548 193,808 105,260 54.3
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,942 49,295 100,381 51,086 50.9
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 1,095 12,439 27,850 15,411 55.3
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 49,583 299,210 605,538 306,328 50.6
55 LV~ILITIES 415 9,601 17,175 7,574 44.1
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,061 8,469 10,460 1,991 19.0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 3,000 3,000 100.0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 1,500 1,500 0
Totals 72,764 469,062 959,712 490,650 51.1
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 72,764 469,062 959,712 490,650 51.1
Totals 72,764 469,062 959,712 490,650 51.1
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS/BLDGS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/11/2001 ' 6 Months ( 50,0% ) Completed
~ 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~3:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRDBR01
SUMo3~ Department Budge~E~penditure Summary
" 01/01/01 ' 06/30/01
Cur 'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/GPd~DS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:3B VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMs31 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
o~/o~/o~ - o6/3o/o~ -'
Cur'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Une~pended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALE
01 ENGINEERING SERVICES 77,355 307,569 659,453 351,884 53.4
05 TRAFFIC CNTRL & STREET LGNTNG 15,071 114,975 533,214 418,239 78.4
Totals 92,426 422,544 1,192,667 770,123 64.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 40,939 223,261 492,243 268,982 54.6
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10,211 60,210 130,112 69,902 53.7
52 OTMER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 3,801 5,930 2,129 35.9
54 CONTP, ACTUAL SERVICES 37,299 69,591 184,822 115,231 62.3
55 UTILITIES 0 54,812 248,800 193,988 78.0
97 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 56 4,035 15,875 11,840 74.6
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 728 2,700 1,972 73.0
67 OTRER EQUIPMENT 0 2,185 2,185 0
69 INFR3~STRUCTURE 3,921 3,931 110,000 106,079 96.4
Totals 92,426 422,544 1,192,667 770,123 64.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GSNERAL FLTND 87,945 393,449 916,397 522,948 57.1
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 4,481 29,095 276,270 247,175 89.5
Totals 92,426 422,544 1,192,667 770,123 64.6
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:~8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( S0.0% ) Remaining
FRRQBR01
SUMo~i Department Budget E~penditure Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEWER Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOT;tLS
01 WATER & SEWER DIVISION ADMIN 72,733 536,806 1,407,060 870,254 61.8
02 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 644 10,319 83,499 73,180 87.6
03 MAINTENANCE OF GROL~S 5,426 23,208 80,652 57,444 71.2
04 WATER SUPPLY MAINT & REPAIR 24,172 186,994 668,666 481,672 72.0
05 WATER DISTRBT MAINT & REPAIR 26,151 196,255 601,451 405,196 67.4
06 WATER VALVE/HYDRNT MAINT & REP 24,300 115,693 287,001 171,308 59.7
07 WATER METER F~%INT & REPL 15,546 75,109 273,934 198,825 72.6
08 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 44,081 264,487 528,975 264,488 50.0
09 SANITARY SEWER MAINT & REPAIR 33,118 160,171 427,617 267,446 62.5
10 WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPROV 30,413 302,547 845,970 543,423 64.2
12 LAM MICHIGAN WATER SUPPLY 260,462 1,198,345 3,056,480 1,858,135 60.8
Totals 987,046 3,069,934 8,261,305 5,191,371 62.8
EXPENDITURE CI~SSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 88,962 578,016 1,331,253 753,237 56.6
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 28,405 176,856 377,000 200,144 53.1
52 OTNER EMPLOYEE COSTS 359 11,502 25,720 14,218 55.3
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 362,659 2,027,837 5,024,764 2,996,927 59.6
55 UTILITIES 722 57,346 137,170 79,824 58.2
56 INSURANCE 8,838 53,027 106,053 53,026 50.0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 14,205 64,341 234,634 170,293 72.6
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 150 11,082 22,364 11,282 50.4
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,138 1,391 5,438 4,047 74.4
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 1,195 9,175 264,300 255,125 96.5
68 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 30,413 79,361 625,509 546,148 87.3
71 BOND PRINCIPAL 0 0 107,100 107,100 100.0
Totals 537,046 3,069,934 8,261,305 5,191,371 62.8
SOURCE OF FUNDS
610 WATER AND SEWER FUND 537,046 3,069,934 8,261,305 5,191,371 62.8
Totals 537,046 3,069,934 8,261,305 5,191,371 62.8
07/li/2001 6 Months 50.0% ) Completed
13:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months 5o.o% ) Remainin9
FRRDBR01
SUMO~i Department Budget Expenditure Summary .
01/01/01 - 06/30/01 -'
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DISPOSAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
· 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~3:~7:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRR~BR01
SUM03I Department Budge~Expenditure Summary
~' 01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - VEHICLE MAINT Expended ExpeNded Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 VEHICLE DIVISION ADMINSTRATION 9,535 68,721 146,019 77,298 52.9
02 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 79,444 425,716 1,009,370 583,654 57.8
Totals 88,979 694,487 1,155,889 660,952 57.2
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 41,101 237,739 536,539 298,800 58.7
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,454 68,132 145,890 77,158 53.1
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 25 2,900 2,875 99.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,928 33,171 53, 160 19, 989 37.6
55 UTILITIES 14 939 965 26 2.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 28,304 154,253 392,785 238,532 60.7
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 1,000 1,000 100.0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 178 178 22,750 22,572 99.2
Totals 88,979 494,437 1,155,389 660,952 57.2
SOURCE OF FUNDS
660 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 88,979 494,437 1,155,389 660,952 57.2
Totals 88,979 494,437 1,158,389 660,952 57.2
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
x3:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~ Months ( 50.0% ) Remainlng
FRRDBR01
suM031 Department Budget Expenditure Su/nmary
01/ol/ol - 06/30/01
Cur'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRR~BR01
SUM0n Department Budget Expenditure Summary
ol/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur 'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
01 VILLAGE IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIP 78,373 167,435 2,983,037 2,815,602 94.4
02 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 8,355 26,097 2,386,472 2,330,375 98.9
04 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 0 11,765 3,011,942 3,000,177 99.6
06 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 764,951 1,193,908 5,499,970 4,306,062 78.3
Totals 1,024,279 2,617,406 17,170,483 14,553,077 84.8
55 UTILITIES 0 277 0 -277
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 88,380 595,471 1,082,742 487,271 45.0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 11,121 78,897 318,639 239,742 75.2
66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 69,437 568,350 1,500,245 931,895 62.1
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 52,064 63,072 136,473 73,401 53.8
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 770,656 1,234,988 11,143,859 9,909,271 88.9
Totals 1,024,279 2,617,406 17,170,483 14,553,077 84.8
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 86,728 214,541 3,811,843 3,597,302 94.4
520 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 0 0
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 92,163 614,390 1,772,742 1,158,352 68.3
560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 542,322 549,689 3,596,917 3,007,228 84.5
Totals 1,024,279 2,617,406 17,170,483 14,553,077 84.8
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
DEBT SERVICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/11/2001 ~ ; 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~3:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRR~BR01
SUM0~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
" 01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur 'Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended unexpended
RETIREE PENSIONS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 MISCELLANEOUS PENSIONS 4,253 25,521 56,695 31,174 55.0
02 POLICE PENSIONS 139,489 832,635 1,813,738 981,103 54.1
Totals 287,890 1,702,374 3,668,508 1,966,134 53.6
Totals 287,890 1,702,374 3,668,508 1,966,134 53.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 1,293 7,760 21,170 13,410 63.3
710 POLICE PENSION FL~ND 139,489 832,635 1,813,738 981,103 54.1
730 BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND 2,960 17,761 35,525 17,764 50.0
Totals 287,890 1,702,374 3,668,508 1,966,134 53.6
07/11/2001 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~3:37:38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Month~ { 50 m 0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
RISK MANAGEMENT E~pended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 CASUALTY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 63,129 460,454 851,190 390,736 45.9
02 MEDICAL INSURANCE 592,249 1,421,034 2,669,713 1,248,679 46.8
Totals 655,378 1,881,488 3,520,903 1,639,415 46.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 1,643 38,950 37,307 95.8
56 INSURANCE 655,378 1,879,845 3,481,953 1,602,108 46.0
Totals 655,378 1,881,488 3,520,903 1,639,415 46.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 655,378 1,881,488 3,520,903 1,639,415 46.6
Totals 655,378 1,881,488 3,520,903 1,639,415 46.6
22
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
07/11/2001
I~OUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
13:37:30
VILLAGE
OF
FRRD~R01
suM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 06/30/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
NON-DEPARTMENTAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 CONTINGENCIES 160,493 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
Totals 160,493 320,986 641,970 320,985 50.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
53 PENSION BENEFITS 0 0 0 0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 160,493 320,985 641,970 320, 985 50.0
Totals 160,493 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
SO%rRCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 142,993 285,985 571,970 285,985 50.0
670 VEEICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 17,500 35,000 70,000 35,000 50.0
Totals 160,493 320,985 641,970 320,985 50.0
23
07/11/2001 6 Months ( S0.0% ) Completed
13:37:~8 VILLAGE ,.-~ MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 06/30/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Une~pended
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 LIBRARY SERVICES 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
90 COMPONENT UNIT EXPENDITURES 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
950 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
24
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 13, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA- 12-01 - CONDITIONAL USE (CIRCULAR DRIVE)
600 W. KENSINGTON ROAD
STEVE SOKOLIK- APPLICANT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-12-01, a request for a
circular drive, as described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the
request at their June 28, 2001 meeting.
The subject property is a corner lot located at the northwest corner of Kensington and Prospect Manor, in a single-
family residential neighborhood. There are currently two driveways on the subject property and the petitioner
would like to pave the area in between the driveways to provide a safe entrance onto Prospect Manor. Data from
the Police Department indicates that there are Waffle issues in the neighborhood.
After discussing how vehicles from Rand Road and Kensington use Prospect Manor as a cut-through street, the
aesthetic impact of paving the area along Prospect Manor, and how the circular drive would provide a safe
entrance onto Prospect Manor, the Zoning Board of Appeals members voted 3-1 to recommend approval of a
request for a eireular drive at 600 W. Kensington Road, Case No. ZBA-12-01.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
July 17, 2001 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
William J. ~ooney, Jl~.~ AICP
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-12-2001 Hearing Date: June 28, 2001
PETITIONER: Steve and Janiee Sokolik
600 W. Kensington Rd.
PUBLICATION DATE: June 13, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Conditional Use to allow construction of a circular driveway
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Keith Youngquist
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Steve & Janiee Sokolik
Chairperson Arlene Juraeek called the meeting to order at 7:47 p.m. The minutes of the May 24, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0. At 8:04 p.m., Ms. Juraeek introduced Case No. ZBA-12-01, a request for a Conditional Use to allow a
circular drive.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staffmemorandum for the ease. The subject property is located at the
northeast comer of Prospect Manor and Kensington Road. Ms. Counolly said that this area of Mount Prospect does
not have curbs or sidewalks and the street is 22-feet wide, compared to "improved streets" that measure closer to 27'
wide. The home has two driveways, which are located along and accessed from Prospect Manor. The previous
property owner converted the attached garage to living space and constructed a detached garage with a new driveway.
The Village did not require the property owner to remove the original driveway when the new driveway was
completed. Current code requirements permit only one driveway. The current property owners use both driveways
and would like to link the two driveways together and create a circular driveway to afford a safe entrance onto
Prospect Manor. There is a tree and concrete blocks in a portion of the area that the petitioner would like to pave. The
drive would be designed in a way that preserves the tree. Ms. Connolly explained that, in order to approve the request,
standards for a Conditional Use must be met. The standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance relate to the impact of the
request on public health, safety, and general welfare; if the request will adversely impact other properties and so forth.
Staff reviewed the petitioners' plat of survey and site plan, visited the site, and found that the subject property is a
12,000 square foot parcel developed with a single family home with 2 driveways along Prospect Manor, which is
classified as a local street. To clarify, a local street is defined as a street "intended to serve only vehicle trips generated
by land use abutting the street and the function of this type of street is local access within a neighborhood". Data
supplied by the Record's Division of the Village's Police Department indicates that, within the last six months, there
were 3 driving complaints (erratic driving, speeding), 8 parking complaints (blocked driveways, vehicles blocking the
street, etc.), and 2 accidents without injuries. In addition, the Police Department set-up Traffic Enforcement Detail
three times this year. While Traffic Enforcement Detail is not unusual for this particular area because of its proximity
to major arterial roads, 3 times in 6 months is not typical for a local street.
The Engineering Division confirmed that the Village does not plan to install curbs, gutters, and sidewalks in this
neighborhood and, while they don't object to the requested circular drive, they note that high traffic volumes occur
during peak traffic hours on certain days.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 12-2001
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson Page 2
Ms. Connolly evaluated the request with respect to the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance and said the proposed
circular driveway would not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. In this case, the petitioner is seeking a
circular drive to provide a safe entry onto Prospect Manor, a heavily traveled local street. Village records indicate that
there are traffic issues in the neighborhood. The circular driveway would not have a negative impact on the adjacent
area, utility provision or public streets. The essential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the
proposed Conditional Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare.
Ms. Connolly said that, based on these findings, staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the
Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the residence at 600 W. Kensington Road, Case
No. ZBA-12-01. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. Ms. Juracek asked Ms. Connolly if public notice
had been given and Ms. Connolly said yes.
Steve Sokolik was sworn in and testified he wanted to attach his two separate driveways into a circular driveway so
could pull forward into Prospect Manor instead of backing into it. He said the road continually gets busier and the cars
are going faster. He said his elderly neighbors pull into his driveway to back into theirs. Mr. Sokolik said the
neighborhood residents had tried to get the street closed years ago due to cars on Kensington taking a short cut through
their street but the Village could not close it because emergency vehicles needed to access the street.
At 8:16, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members Hal
Ettinger said that allowing this circular driveway would be a short-term-fix, rather than addressing the real issues. Ms.
Juracek pointed out that the whole issue was much larger and the Village was grappling with ways to handle the
problem, but meanwhile, the petitioner had two existing driveways and was doing the best he could by connecting
them into a circular drive. Mr. Floros said this request was a confined, localized attempt to remedy an existing
situation.
At 8:23, Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for
Case No. ZBA-12-01, a request to allow construction ora circular driveway at 600 W. Kensington Road. Leo Floros
seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Ettinger, and Juracek
NAYS: Rogers
Motion was approved 3-0.
At I0:10 p.m., after hearing four more cases, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Leo Floros. The
motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
/~Qu~ty E'6~ll~, S~"nior Planner.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: ILrN-E 21, 2001
HEARING DATE: JUNE 28, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA-12-01 - CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A CIRCULAR DRIVE
600 W. KENSINGTON ROAD (SOKOLIK RESIDENCE)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Steve and Janice Sokolik
600 W. Kensington Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
STATUS OF PETITIONER: Property Owners
PARCEL NUMBER: 03 -27 -315 -016
LOT SIZE: 12,112.5 square feet
EXISTING ZONING: RI Single Family Residence
EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residence
LOT COVERAGE: 38% existing lot coverage
41% proposed lot coverage
45% lot coverage maximum per R1 District
REQUESTED ACTION: CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CIRCULAR
DRIVEWAY.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
The subject property is an existing home located at the north east comer of Prospect Manor and Kensington Road.
This area of Mount Prospect has unimproved right-of-ways and does not have curbs or sidewalks and the street is
22-feet wide. The home currently has two driveways, which are located along and accessed from Prospect
Manor. The previous property owner converted the attached garage to living space and constructed a detached
garage with a new driveway. The Village did not require the property owner to remove the original driveway
when the new driveway for the detached garage was completed. The current property owners use both driveways
and would like to link the two driveways together and create a circular driveway. Sec. 14.2215.A. I of the Zoning
Ordinance requires Conditional Use approval for new circular driveways.
ZBA-12-01
Meeting of June 28, 2001
Page 2
Currently there is a tree and concrete blocks in a portion of'the area that the petitioner would like to pave. The
petitioner would like to preserve the tree and pave an area that creates a safe entrance on to Prospect Manor, as
noted in his application.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioners' plat of survey and site
plan, and visited the site.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate
to:
c~ The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare;
Q The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
rn Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on
Village streets; and
~ Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Village Ordinances.
The subject property for the proposed Conditional Use is a 12,112 square foot parcel developed with a one-sto~y
single family home. The applicant proposes to construct a circular driveway in his exterior side yard, along
Prospect Manor. Prospect Manor, north of Kensington, has an unimproved right-of-way (no sidewalks, curbs)
and is classified as a Local Street. Per the Village's Comprehensive Plan, a local street is intended to serve only
vehicle trips generated by land use abutting the street and the function of this type of street is local access within a
neighborhood. Data supplied by the Record's Division of the Village's Police Department indicates that, within
the last six months, there were 3 driving complaints (erratic driving, speeding), 8 parking complaints (blocked
driveways, vehicles blocking the street, etc.), and 2 accidents without injuries (involves vehicles). In addition, the
Police Department set-up Traffic Enforcement Detail three times this year. While Traffic Enforcement Detail is
not unusual for this particular area because of its proximity to major arterial roads, 3 times in 6 months is not
typical for a local street. The analysis does not include the number of traffic citations issued in this neighborhood.
The Engineering Division confirmed that the Village does not plan to install curbs, gutters, and sidewalks in this
neighborhood. They found that the 22-foot street width is typical of streets without curbs, whereas streets with
curbs measure 27-feet from curb to curb, providing more space to park on streets and navigate around parked cars.
While the Engineering Division does not object to the requested circular drive, they note that the street most likely
experiences high traffic volumes during peak traffic hours (rash-hour, after the high school gets out) on certain
days.
The circular drive is listed as a Conditional Use in the parking section of the Zoning Ordinance. The petitioner
currently has two driveways and would like to pave the area between the driveways to link the two driveways.
The proposed circular driveway would not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. In fact, there is another
corner house in close proximity to the subject property that has two driveways, which provide access onto two
different streets. In addition, there are other properties in the Village with circular driveways that were installed
before the Village required Conditional Use approval for circular driveways. In this ease, the petitioner is seeking
a circular drive to provide a safe entry onto Prospect Manor, a heavily traveled local street. Village records
indicate that there are traffic issues in the neighborhood. The circular driveway would not have a negative impact
BA-12-01
Meeting of June 28, 2001
Page 3
on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets~ The essential character of the neighborhood would not be
affected by the proposed Conditional Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed circular driveway meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the
Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the
Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the residence at 600 W. Kensington
Koad, Case No. ZBA-12-01. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur:
William J. 12ooney, POCP, Director of Community Development
.ct 9 in Block 10 in PROSPECT MEADOWS, a Subdivision of part of the West
!ail of the Southwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11,
~.a~t of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat. thereof
'e¢orded December 9, 1949, as Document 14692921 in Cook County, Illinois.
00. W. Kensington
: 't. Prospect, IL
I0
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS ~ S.S.
COUNTY OF LAKE
Scale: 1" - ~'~ ....
In behalf of Howard Sb~eying ~., inc., we as Illinois
Professional Land Su~eyors do hereby certify that the buildings on lot shown
are within property lines and the adjoining improvements do not encroach on
said premises, except where shown. '
Lot 9 in Block 10 in PROSPECT MEADOWS, a Subdivision of part of the West
Ha"{f of the Southwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 42 ~orth, Range 11,
East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof
recorded December 9, 1949, as Document 14692921 in Cook County, ~inois.
680 W. Kensington
Mt. Prospect, IL
~( ~ ..,.;~.
Scale: 1"
In behalf ol Howard S~eying Co., Inc., we as Illinois
Pro~essionai Land Surveyors do hereby certify that the buildings on lot shown
are within property lines and the adjoining improvements do not encroach on
said premises, except where shown. ,
'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
14)0 S. Emerson Street
Mount Proapect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Application for Conditional Use Approval
~ ~ Development Name/Address ..
Date of Submission '
Hearing Date
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning 'rotal Building Sq. Ft. (Site)
Setbacks:
Front Rear Side Side
Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parl4ng Spaces
Adjacent Land Uses:
North South East West
Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary)
-;'. ' '. [ ~'"~r-~ .' c,, (-: _'/,,. d' ,,, ( ~..'/'. -:' :' c'~:-'/'- - 7 :~,t,'... e'
t,'2:A"':: " ,'-- '~'' ?~,/,t fi"~/z,,C.,,.~.
Name Telephone (day)
Corporation 1 Telephone (evening) "
Stxeet Address Fax
City State Zip Code Pager
~ntercst in Prop¢~.~
Proposed Conditional Uso (as listed in the zoning districO
Descn~oe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessa~)
Hottrs of Operation
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
Site Area (Acres) Property Zomg Total Bu/lding Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use
Setbacks:
Front ' Rear Side Side
Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials
have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the
petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staffso that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at
the time of submittal.
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as ail supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given
to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the o',mcr of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the
property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours
for visual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby af£mn that all i~o~on provided herein and in all mater{als submitted in association with this application are tree and
If applicant is not property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the
associated supporting material.
Property Owner Date
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
www.mountprospect.org 3 TDD 847.392.6064
uly 8.2001
Mr. Bill Cooney
Director, Community Developmem
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
RE: ZBA -12-01 Conditional Use to Allow a Circular Drive
Dear Mr. Cooney,
I am requesting the second reading of the ordinance to be waived by the Village Board
for a conditional use to allow a circular driveway to be constructed at my home at 600
West Kensington Road. This request is a result of the Zoning Board's positive
recommendation on June 28, 2001.
600 West Kensington Road
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Kad
07/05/2001
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY
GENERALLY KNOWN AS 600 W. KENSINGTON ROAD
WHEREAS, Steve and Janice Sokolik (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed a
petition for a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 600 W. Kensington Road,
(hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
Property Index Number: 03-27-315-016
Lot 9 Jn Block 10 in Prospect Meadows, a Subdivision of part of the West ~ of
The SW ¼ of Sec. 27, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the 3rd Principal
Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded Dec. 9, 1949 as Document
14692921 in Cook County, IL.
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use to construct a circular driveway; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 12-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 28th day of June, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13th day of June, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and positive
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being
the subject of ZBA 12-01; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be
in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Page 2/2
600 W. Kensington
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Conditional Use, as provided for in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village
Code, to allow the construction of a circular driveway, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy
of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVEDthis day ~ ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\G EN\flles\WlN\O R DINAN C\C.US E.16-01 1006 W, isabella.doc
Lot 9 in Block 10 in PROSPECT MEADOWS, a Subdivision of part of the West
Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11,
Ea~.t of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat. thereof
recorded December 9, 1949, as Document 14692921 in Cook County, Illinois.
600 W. Kensington
Mt. Prospect, IL
~i °"~li ............................
Kens n ? Roa ' "'
COUNTY OF LAKE
Scale: 1" ~3~
In behalf of Howard Sb~eying Co., Inc., we as Illinois
Professional Land Surveyors do hereby certify that the buildings on lot shown
are within property lifles and the adjoining improvements do not encroach on
said premises, except where shown.
~ ~ ~ ~ I u~ DatedAD att~Waukegan, Lake County, Illinois this~
Lot 9 in Block 18 in PROSPECT MEADOWS, a Subdivision of part of the West
}[a'{f of the SoUthwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11,
East of the Third PrincJpal Meridian, according to the plat. thereof
recorded December 9, 1949, as Document 14692921 in Cook County, Illinois.
688 W. Kensington
Mt. Prospect, IL
/0 ·
.~o' ~,,,'/~,',~
Scale: 1"
In behalf ol Howard S~eying Co., Inc., we as Illinois
Professional Land Surveyor8 do hereby certify that the buildings on Jot shown
are within property' lines and the adjoining improvements do not encroach on
said premises, 8xc8pJ where shown.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DnlECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 13, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA- 13 -01 - CONDITIONAL USE (UNENCLOSED PORCH)
17 AUDREY LANE
ROBERT KKON - APPLICANT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-13-01, a request for an
unenclosed covered porch, as described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board of Appeals
heard the request at their June 28, 2001 meeting.
The subject property is located in a single-family residential neighborhood. The petitioner is in the process of
remodeling the house and adding a second story addition to the existing home. The petitioner feels that the porch
would create a unified look to the house and be in character with the neighborhood. The proposed addition
complies with Village codes, but the porch requires Conditional Use approval because it encroaches into the front
setback.
After a brief discussion of the proposed materials, the neighborhood, and the Zoning Code Conditional Use
standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals members voted 4-0 to recommend approval of a request for a
Conditional Use permit for the construction of an unenclosed covered porch within 25 feet of the front property
line at 17 Audrey Lane, Case No. Z~BA-13-01.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
July 17, 2001 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
William J. G~ooney, Jr.} AICP
obert Kron May 16, 2001
17 Audrey Lane
Mt. Prospect, IL. 60056
Village of Mt. Prospect
Building Division
I00 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL. 60056
Re: CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR THE FRONT PORCH
Dear Village Board Members,
I have submitted an application for Conditional Use for the construction of a new front
porch in conjunction with our second story addition. The porch encroaches the building
tine by the allowable five feet. We have received our approved building plans and
permits with the exception of the front porch. I was instructed by Judy to request a waiver
of the second reading from the Zoning Board so we may get a final authorization on July
18t~ 2000. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. I have been pleasantly
surprised by how helpful all your staff members have been in assisting us through this
construction.
Sincerely,
Robert Kron
Cc: Rodrick Van Wart
William G. George
Michel Blue
MINUTES o 'rm REGuLaR or
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-13-2001 Hearing Date: June 28, 2001
PETITIONER: Robert Kron
17 lq. Audrey Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: June 13, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Conditional Use to allow construction of an unenclosed porch
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotton
Keith Youngquist
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Robert Kron
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:47 p.m. The minutes of the May 24, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0. At 8:23 p.m., Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-13-01, a request for a Conditional Use to allow
construction of an unenclosed porch.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the case by reporting that the subject property is an existing home located
on an interior lot on a single-family residential street. The home is currently set back approximately 31-feet from the
front lot line. She said that the applicant proposes to construct an unenclosed porch along the front of the house. This
requires Conditional Use approval because the porch will encroach into the required front yard.
Ms. Connolly said that the petitioners are adding a second story addition and, as noted in their application, the porch
would create a unified look to the residence. The proposed porch will be made of wood, but have a cement base. It
would be attached to the front oftbe house and be set back 25.45-feet from the front property line. The front elevation
of the home will be modified (adding a new bay window, relocating the door, and using a stone cast material instead of
the brick). Ms. Connolly said the petitioner states in his application that the proposed porch will complement the
second story addition and enhance the home.
Ms. Connolly reminded members that, in order to approve the unenclosed porch, the requested Conditional Use must
meet the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance, which relate to the request not having a detrimental effect on the
public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; how the request will impact the use, enjoyment, or value of
other properties in the vicinity. She reported that staff had reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, site plan and
elevations & visited the site. She described the subject parcel as a 10,004.82 square foot parcel developed with a one-
story single family home. Ms. Connolly reported that the proposed second story addition meets all other zoning
requirements, but the porch encroaches into the front yard and requires Conditional Use approval. She said the
unenclosed porch meets the standards for a Conditional Use and would not have a negative impact on the adjacent
area, utility provision or public streets. She said the porch would not change the residential character of the
neighborhood, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare. The proposed Conditional Use will be in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Ms. Connolly said that, based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the
Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach five-feet into the required
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 13-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
front setback for the residence at 17 N. Audrey Lane, Case NO. ZBA-13-01. The Village Board's decision is final for
this case.
Ms. Juracek asked Ms. Cunnolly if public notice had been given and Ms. Connolly said yes. She asked if the
petitioner wished to speak.
Richard Kron was sworn in and said they want a front porch and need an addition to the house as they are expecting
their third child. They decided to add a porch at the same time as the second story addition.
Richard Rogers asked if petitioner understood he could never enclose the porch. Mr. Kron said yes, he understood
that.
Leo Floros asked how long they had lived in that house and Mr. Kron answered 15 years.
At 8:27, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members. As
there was no further discussion, Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a
Conditional Use for Case No. ZBA-13-01, a request to allow construction of an unenclosed porch addition within 25'
of the front property line at 17 N. Audrey Lane. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Ettinger, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS:
Motion was approved 4-0.
At 10:10 p.m., after hearing three more cases, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Leo Floros. The
motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
~?~t*dy C'ofi?61¥y, Sen ~6r p la3mer/ ~
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 21, 2001
HEARING DATE: JUNE 28, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA-13-01 - CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN UNENCLOSED PORCH
17 N. AUDREY LANE (KKON RESIDENCE)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Robert Kron
17 N. Audrey Lane
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
STATUS OF PETITIONER: Property Owner
PARCEL NUMBER: 08-10-214-009
LOT SIZE: I0,004.82 square feet
EXISTING ZONING: R1 Single Family Residence
EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residence
LOT COVERAGE & FAR: PROPOSED: 33% lot coverage and ~25 FAR
MAXIMUM PERMITTED: 45% lot coverage and .5 FAR
REQUESTED ACTION: CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN UNENCLOSED
PORCH ADDITION WITHIN 25' OF THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
The subject property is an existing home located on an interior lot on a single-family residential street. The home
is currently set back approximately 31-feet from the front lot line. The applicant proposes to construct a 5.5'x41'
unenclosed porch along the front of the house, which requires a Conditional Use to allow the porch to encroach
into the required front yard.
The enclosed plans show a wooden porch with a cement base that would be attached to the front of the existing
home and set back 25.45-feet from the front property line. The petitioner is adding a second story addition and
the porch will create a unified look to the residence. The front elevation of the home will be modified because the
petitioner is adding a new bay window, relocating the door, and using a stone cast material instead of the brick.
Like other Conditional Use requests for a porch, the petitioner states in his application that the proposed porch
will complement the second story addition and enhance the home.
BA-13-2001
ZBA Meeting of June 28, 2001
Page 2
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site
plan, and visited the site.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate
to:
rn The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare;
The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
n Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on
Village streets; and
o Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Village Ordinances.
The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 10,004.82 square foot parcel developed with a one-story
single family home. The applicant proposes a porch that extends into the front setback. The encroachment of the
porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the R1 district and the home, including the second
story addition, meets all other zoning requirements. The proposal would not have a negative impact on the
adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The single-family residential character of the neighborhood
would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public
welfare. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning
Ordinance requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed porch will complement the existing home and proposed second story addition and meets the
Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings,
Staffrecommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a
covered, unenclosed porch to encroach five-feet into the required front setback for the residence at 17 N. Audrey
Lane, Case No. ZBA-13-01. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
I concurl
William J. (Jooney, AICP,0Director of Community Development
' VIL'LAGE OF MC"'3NT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
100 $. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Application for Conditional Use Approval
Case Number
ZBA ''
Development Name/Address
Date of Submission
Hearing Date
.
Address(es) (S~'eet Number, Street) /
Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning TotaT'Bfiilding Sq. Ft. (Site)
Setbacks:
Froot Rear Side o cf Side
3 1 i3 ~Z/ /o. ~/,
.
Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
Adjacent Land Uses:
North South West
Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
O~ - lo- o2~1 - c: e
Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary)
t'
N~'ne ~,' ' --d
~o ~ 7 ~'f'~o Telephone (day)
Co~oration Telephone (even~g)
S~eet Address Fax
Ci~ ' State Zip Code Pager
Inte~st in Prope~
'Name '~' Telepho~
C°moration ~ T~l~phone (~v~ning)
Street Ad.ss F~:
C~ State Zip Code Pager
Developer
q~e _ . _ Telephone (day)
Ad.ess << ....... Fax
N~e Telephone (day)
Ad.ess /' F~
: Su~eyor
Engineer
N~e Telephone (day)
Ad&ess
Arehitect
Nme ~om~ ~;'~ [ Telephone (day):
Landscape Architect
N~e Telephone (~y):
Address
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
2 TDD 8~7.392.6064
Proposed Conditional Use (as listed in the zoning district)
Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the PropOsed Use Meets the Attached Standards for
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets it' necess .a~y)
~ I /
Hours of Operation
-
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
~_ ~ Site Area (Acres). Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use
~ :~ Setbacks:
~ Front2~_, ~ Rear ~/ Side /~),~q Side
m -- Buildi~c~ei~t. T°'~A' [ Lot Coverage {~0)~ :;~/d Number of Parking Spaces
Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials
have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the
petitioner schedule an appointt'nent with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness
at the time of submittal.
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given
to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the
property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours
for visual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are trae and
Applicant ~__~ ~r.~,.~_.---~- Date
If applicant is not property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the
associated supposing material.
Property Owner Date
Mount Prospect Department of Communi~ Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Straet} Mount Prospect Illinois - Pax 847.818.5329
3 TDD 847.392.6064
Y
LAND SURVEYING CONE }LTANTS OF ILLINOIS P.C.
12 EAST WILLOW ST, LOMBAI ILL 60148 (312) 620-7589
15'-0"
82.0
n FRAME
~ GARAGE
NEW FIRS;D FLOOR
ONE 'STORY ADDITION
NORTH AUDREY LANE
NFORMAllON SHOWN O~'TAINED FROM A PLAT OF SURVEY
~7 NO. 87-13.32; DATED 3 F'BRUARY, 1987 BY LAND SORVE~N¢
CONSULT~ S OF ILUNOIS.
FRONT ELEVATION
sc~,~z: '/~' - r-o" 'Z"
Robert Kron May l6,2001
17Audrey Lane
Mt. Prospect, IL. 60056
Village ofMt. Pmspect
BuildingDivihon
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL. 60056
Re: CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR THE FRONT PORCH
o' .? Dear Village Board Members,
· °' I have submitted an application for Conditional Use for the construction of a new front
pomh in conjunction with our second story addition. The pomh encroaches the building
line by the allowable five feet. We have received our approved building plans and
permits with the exception of the front porch. I was instructed by Judy to request a waiver
of the second reading from the Zoning Board so we may get a final authorization on July
18t~ 2000. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. I have been pleasantly
surprised by how helpful all your staff members have been in assisting us through this
construction.
Sincerely,
Robert Kron
Cc: Rodrick Van Watt
William G. George
Michel Blue
7/2/01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17 AUDREY LANE
WHEREAS, Robert Kron (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for a
Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 17 Audrey Lane (hereinafter
referred to as the "Subject Property"), legally described as follows:
Property Index Number: 08-10-214-009
Lot 28 on Hatlen Heights Unit #3, a Subdivision of part of the NE ¼ of
Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the 3rd Principal Meridian,
according to the register in the Office of the Registure of Letters of Cook
County, IL on July 11, 1956 as Document 1682004;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to construct an unenclosed
covered porch within 25 feet (25') of the front property line; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Conditional Use being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 13-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 28th day of June, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13th day of June, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and positive
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being
the subject of
ZBA 13-01; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be
in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
Page 2/2
17 Audrey Lane
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit for the construction of an unenclosed porch
within 25 feet (25') of the front property line, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which
is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\GEN\flles\WIN\ORDINANC\ConUse, 17 Audrey Ln, porch, Jul 2001 .doc
82,0
~o FRANE
~ GARAGE
NEW FIRSt' FLOOR
ONE STORY ~DITION ~ ~-'
,, ~,
~ NEW FIRST
....... AUDREY LANE
NORTH
~ SITE P~N
/~ ~' Y~ - ~'-o'
NFORMA~ON ~HO~ O~T~N~D ~ROM A P~T
~Y~ NO 87-1332, DASD 3 FBRU~, 1987 ~ ~D SUR~NG
CONSULT~S OF I~INOIS,
Village of Mount Prospect
COmmunity Development Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: JULY 13, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA-14-01 - CONDITIONAL USE (UNENCLOSED PORCH)
305 N. FAIRVIEW
MONICA & DONALD OBLINGER- APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA,!4-0L a request ~ n
unenclosed covered porch, as described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board~ of Appeals
heard the request at their June 28, 2001 meeting.
The subject property is located in a single-family residential neighborhood. The petitioner is in the process of
adding a second story addition and remodeling the house. Similar to other requests for an unenclosed pomh in the
front yard, the petitioners feel that the porch would be a benefit to the neighborhood because the porch would
create a unified look to the house. The proposed addition complies with Village codes, but the porch requires
Conditional Use approval because it encroaches into the front setback.
After a brief discussion of the proposed second story addition, how the porch will unify the front faCade of the
house, and the Zoning Code Conditional Use standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals members voted 4-0 to
recommend approval of a request for a Conditional Use permit for the construction of an unenclosed covered
porch within 25 feet of the front property line at 305 N. Fairview Avenue, Case No. ZBA-14-01.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
July 17, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
William J (~6oney, Jr, ~icP
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 21, 2001
HEARING DATE: JUNE 28, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA-14-01 - CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN UNENCLOSED PORCH
305 N. FAIRVIEW AVENUE (OBLINGER RESIDENCE)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Monica & Donald Oblinger
305 N. Fairview Avenue
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
STATUS OF PETITIONER: Property Owners
PARCEL NUMBER: 03-34-301-009
LOT SIZE: 7,249.69 square feet
EXISTING ZONING: RA Single Family Residence
EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residence
LOT COVERAGE & FAR: EXISTING: 45% lot coverage / .16 FAR
PROPOSED: 48.8% lot coverage / .37 FAR
MAXIMUM PERMITTED: 50% lot coverage and .5 FAR
REQUESTED ACTION: CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN UNENCLOSED
PORCH ADDITION WITHIN 25' OF THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE.
BACKGROUND A_ND ?ROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
The subject property is an existing home located on an interior lot on a single-family residential street. The home
is currently set back 33-feet from the front lot line. The applicants propose to construct a 6'x40' unenclosed porch
along the front of the house, which requires a Conditional Use to allow the porch to encroach into the required
front yard.
The petitioners are remodeling their house and adding a second story addition. The enclosed plans show that the
porch would run the length of the front of the house and encroach approximately tb. ree-feet into the required 30-
foot setback. In their application, the petitioners state that the porch would unify the front fagade of the house and
make the addition blend in and balance the look of the house. As with other Conditional Use requests for an
unenclosed pomh, the petitioners feel that the proposed porch will bring a benefit to the neighborhood.
BA-14-2001
ZBA Meeting of June 28, 2001
Page 2
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioners' plat of survey and site
plan, and visited the site.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate
to:
The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare;
~ The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
cl Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on
Village streets; and
c~ Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Village Ordinances.
The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 7,249.69 square foot parcel developed with a one-story
single family home. The applicants propose to construct a porch that extends three-feet into the front setback.
The encroachment of the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the RA district and the
house, including the addition, meets all other zoning requirements. (The detached garage is located less then 3'
from the interior lot lines, but is a legal, non-conforming structure that is allowed to remain in the same location.)
The porch would not have a negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed
Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements.
The single-family residential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the proposed Conditional
Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed unenclosed porch would help to unify the second story addition with the e~isting home and it meets
the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings,
Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a
covered, unenclosed porch to encroach into the required front setback for the residence at 305 lq. Fairview
Avenue, Case No. ZBA-14-01. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur:
William J. Co'ney, AICP, Birector of Community Development
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-14-2001 Hearing Date: June 28, 2001
PETITIONER: Monica & Donald Oblinger
305 N. Fairview Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE: June 13, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Conditional Use to allow construction of an unenclosed porch
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotton
Keith Youngquist
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Monica & Donald Oblinger
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:47 p.m. The minutes of the May 24, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0. At 8:29 p.m., Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-14-01, a request for a Conditional Use to allow
construction of an unenclosed porch.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. She reported that the subject property
is an existing home located on an interior lot on a single-family residential street and is currently set back 33-feet from
the front lot line. The applicants propose to construct an unenclosed porch along the front of the house.
Ms. Connolly stated that the petitioners are remodeling their house and adding a second story addition. The porch
would nm the length of the front of the house and encroach approximately three-feet into the required 30-foot setback.
She said the petitioners feet that the proposed porch will bring a benefit to the neighborhood because it would unify the
front fagade of the house and make the addition blend in and balance the look of the house. Ms. Counolly said that, in
order to approve an unenclosed porch in the front setback, the request must meet the standards for a conditional use
which relate to the request not having a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general
welfare; and how the request will impact the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity. She reported
that Staff reviewed the petitioners' plat of survey, site plan, elevations, and visited the site and found that the subject
parcel is a 7,200 square foot parcel with a one-story single family home and a detached garage. The encroachment of
the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the RA district and the house, including the addition,
'meets all other zoning requirements. Ms. Connolly said the porch meets the standards for a Conditional Use listed in
the Zoning Ordinance as it would not have a negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets; it
would be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The single-family
residential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use.
Based on these findings, Ms. Connolly relayed Staff's recommendation that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board
to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach into the required front setback for the
residence at 305 N. Fairview Avenue, Case No. ZBA-14-01. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
Ms. Juracek asked Ms. Connolly if public notice had been given and Ms. Connolly said yes. Ms. Juracek asked if the
petitioner wanted to speak.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 14-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Monica & Donald Oblinger were sworn in and said they were vcny excited about their addition. They have lived here
sixteen years and love their neighborhood and do not want to leave it for a larger home.
Hal Ettinger asked if the second floor addition would encroach or only the porch. He was answered that only the porch
would encroach.
Richard Rogers asked if they understood the porch could never be enclosed and was answered affirmatively.
At 8:33, Chairperson Juracek closed the public heating and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board mcnnbers. As
there was no further discussion, Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a
request for a Conditional Use for Case No. ZBA-14-01, to allow construction of an unenclosed porch addition that
would encroach into the required front setback for the residence at 305 N. Fairview Ave. Leo Floros seconded the
motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floras, Ettinger, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS:
Motion was approved 4-0.
At 10:10 p.m., after hearing two more cases, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Leo Floros. The
motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
.... ,
,~hc~y Coni,/~lfy, gehior l~lanner
VILLAGE OF MuUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division /~
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Application for Conditional Use Approval
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site)
Setbacks:
Front Rear ~
~ " I Side Side
Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
Adjacent Land Uses:
North South East West
Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessau)
Name Telephone(day)
Co~oration ~ ~ '~Tg~: Telephone (eyeing)
S~eet Ad&ess Fax
Ciw State Zip Code Pager
Interest in Prope~
Name Telephone ,, ..y)
Corporatlon Telephone (evening)
Street Address Fax:
City State Zip Code Pager
Developer
Name ~ ,. Telephone (day)
Address Fax
Attorney' :~,
Name i ', Telephone (day)
Address Fax
Surveyor
Name ... Telephone (day)
Address Fax
Engineer .
Name Telephone (day)
Address Fax
-Architect
Name /~t~vt,~.~ ~J- ~c~;//~ Telephone(day): ecff2
Landscape Architect
Name Telephone (day):
Address Fax
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
www.mountprospect.org 2 TDD 847.392.6064
I Proposed Conditignal Use (as list_ed in the ~orling ~l~s~.ct) ,
,.Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Us~ Meets the Attached Standards for
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary)
Hours of Operation · ·
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
~ Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Devote~ to Proposed
Use
~ ~ Setbacks:
Pront eas Side Side
m ~ Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all requked plans and other materials
have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested ttmt the
petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staffso that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at
the time of submittal.
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all suppoz'ting documentation, it is requested that approval be given
to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the
property grant employees of the Village of Moant Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours
for visual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby affkm that all information provided herein and in all mater/als submitted in association with this application are tree and
accurate [p-the best of my lmowledge.
' ..,
If applicant 'rs not-property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and thc
associated supporting material.
Property Owner Date
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
www.motmtprospect.org 3 TDD 847.392.6064
Oblinger, p. 3. item:
Proposed Conditional Use (as listed in the zoning district)
(SEC. 14.1003 - unenclosed front porch)
We are proposing an unenclosed front porch as part of the renovation and addition to our
home on 305 Fairview Ave. This pomh is an important part of the architectural plan that
also includes a second floor addition. We have used an architect, Tom Bucldey, who has
done some really beautiful home addition designs in the immediate area recently. The
porch as shown on the elevation plans (included) will enhance the aesthetic appearance
and unify the front facade of house. When completed, this pomh will balance the house
and make the addition blend in smoothly (rather than appear as ff a box just landed on the
roof).' We feel that the unenclosed pomh as part of the architecture of the addition will
enhance the appearance of our property as well as blend well with existing homes in the
neighborhood. It is a modem and attractive addition that will add to the overall property
value of the entire neighborhood. There is nothing that would be detrimental or that
would be a drawback to property values, health, safety, morals, comfort or general
welfare. The conditional use will not impede any future developments or ~mprovements
of surrounding properties. Overall, this conditional use for this should improve the look
of the area and keep our village attractive.
AN'lOIN' ,3. ADAMS
~ pLAT Y
Lot l& In Block 11 in PROSPECT MANOR, a Subdivision of part of the Sou~h
West 1/2 of Section ~, Township ~2 North, BaRge 11, East of the Third P=incipal
· - r- - - --X,- ~ NOIJ. VAa'I~t H.I.~ON
I I
iII
- Z--- ~ NOI/¥AEF"i~ HJ_r~o$ r
I I $OLITN ELEVATION
L I
I
vwl
7/2/01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 305 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE
WHEREAS, Monica and Donald Oblinger (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have
filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 305 N.
Fairview Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"), legally described as
follows:
Property Index Number: 03-34-301-009
Lot 14 in Block 11 in Prospect Manor, a Subdivision of part of the South %
of the West ~ of the West % of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11
East of the 3rd Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Conditional Use permit to construct an unenclosed
covered porch within 25 feet (25') of the front property line; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Conditional Use being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 14-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 28th day of June, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13th day of June, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and positive
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being
the subject of ZBA 14-01; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be
in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
305 N. Fairview Avenue
Page 2/2
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit for the construction of an unenclosed porch
within 25 feet (25') of the front property line, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which
is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO~G EN~files~WlN\OR DINAN C~Con Use, 305 Fai~iew, porch, Jul 2001 .doc
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 13, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA- 15-01 - VARIATION (UNENCLOSED PORCH)
418 S. NAWATA AVENUE
TOM & LISA GEORGE - APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-15-01 ' ' request
for an unenclosed covered porch in the exterior side yard, as described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report.
The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their June 28, 2001 meeting.
The subject property is a comer lot located in a single-family residential neighborhood. The petitioners would
like to raze the existing porch and eonslxuet a new porch, maintaining a 13.1-foot setback. The Zoning Ordinance
requires a 20-foot setback. Similar to other requests for an unenclosed porch, the petitioners feel that the porch
would be a benefit to the neighborhood, creating a unified look to the house. The proposed porch requires
Variation approval because it encroaches into the exterior side yard setback.
The ZBA discussed the porch materials, the character and existing setback of other homes in the neighborhood,
and how the proposed porch would be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. After the ZBA
discussed Zoning Code standards for porches they voted 4-0 to recommend approval of a request for a Variation
for a 13.l-foot exterior side yard with the oondition that only an unenclosed, covered porch encroach into the
exterior side yard at 418 S. NaWaTa Avenue, Case No. ZBA-15-01.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
July 17, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-15-2001 Hearing Date: June 28, 2001
PETITIONER: Thomas & Lisa George
418 S. NaWaTa Ave.
PUBLICATION DATE: June 13, 2001 Journal/Toptcs
REQUEST: Variation to extend an unenclosed porch
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Keith Youngquist
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Thomas & Lisa George
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:47 p.m. The minutes of the May 24, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0. At 8:34 p.m., Ms. Juraeek introduced Case No. ZBA-15-01, a request for a Variation to allow
construction of an unenclosed porch.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staffmemorandum for the case. She reported that the subject property
is located on a comer lot on a single-family residential street and the home is currently set back 20.10 feet from Go
Wanda Ave., but there is a 9'x4' unenclosed porch/extended entryway that encroaches into the 20-foot side yard. The
applicant proposes to construct an unanelosed covered porch along GoWanda, which is an exterior side yard, although
it is used as a "front". Ms. Connolly clarified that, according to the Zoning Ordinance, the front of the lot is along
NaWaTa Avenue. In order to construct this porch, the petitioners are seeking a variation to permit a 13.10-foot
exterior yard because the proposed porch will encroach 7' into the required yard. She said the petitioners state in their
application that the porch would be used as a gathering place and not alter the character of the neighborhood.
Ms. Counolly explained that the proposed unenclosed porch is different from other porches that received variations to
be located in the exterior side yard because this porch extends farther into the side yard than the 15' setback previously
approved by the Zoning Board and the proposed porch would be the only modification to the house at this time. She
said staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, site plan, elevations, and visited the site and found that the subject
parcel is a 7,257 square foot parcel that is relatively level, out of any flood zone and rectangular. The parcel is
developed with a single family home and an attached garage.
Ms. Connolly said that, in order to approve the requested variation, the request has to meet the standards for a
Variation as defined in the Zoning Ordinance. She said the reasons for the proposed variation cited in the petitioner's
application address aesthetics and how the porch would not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. The
proposed porch could enhance the character of the existing single-family residential area and would not have a
negative effect on the public welfare. Ms. Connolly did point out however, that no particular condition of the lot
justifies the proposed encroachment. Therefore, there is not sufficient justification for a Variation by the Zoning
Ordinance standards, and based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the
Village Board to deny the proposed Variation to permit an unenclosed porch to encroach 7' into the required 20'
exterior side yard setback for the residence at 418 S. NaWaTa Avenue, Case No. ZBA-15-01. The Village Board's
decision is final for this case.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 15-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Ms. Connolly also informed the Board members that, in 1991,' the petitioner received a variation for 16.5-foot exterior
side yard rather than the 20-feet required by the Zoning Ordinance. The petitioner had recently purchased this lot and
was building a new home. The Zoning Board granted the setback variation in addition to height (26'4" when 24'
max), and FAR (.367 FAR when .35 max) variations citing topography (this property has a lower grade) and
narrowness of the lot as reasons for approving the variations. The Zoning Ordinance has since changed and allows 28'
tall buildings, .5 FAR, and the property was rezoned in 1993 from R1 to PA. The subject property is larger than the
minimum lot size required by the Zoning Ordinance and exceeds the minimum width required (code requires 50-feet
and the subject property measures 58' at the front setback). Therefore, the reasons for granting the previous variations
are no longer applicable to the subject property.
Ms. Juracek asked Ms. Connolly if public notice had been given and Ms. Connolly said yes. Ms. Juracek called upon
the petitioners to address the Board.
Tom & Lisa George were sworn in and said they were doing extensive improvements to their home which would
include a new roof and shutters and repainting. They said they have a hardship issue as they have five children ages 6
to 14 and a small backyard. The children spend most of their playtime in the driveway, which leads to a high-traffic
street. Mr. & Mrs. George said the children would utilize the porch for much of the day, rather than the driveway.
They also said they want the porch as a sunshade for their kitchen, which is too bright and very warm due to its
southern exposure. Mr. George said the porch would be constructed of brick, redwood and cedar. Mrs. George
pointed out that the porch would be built over existing construction and only the stairs would encroach into the
setback. Mr. George identified several homes in the area with non-conforming setbacks.
Ms. Juracek said she thought the planned improvements would be in character with the existing neighborhood. She
also pointed out that a Conditional Use would limit the porch to remaining unenclosed in the future, whereas a
Variation, which was requested, does not set that limitation.
Ms. Connolly said that limitation could be included as a condition to the Variation.
At 9:00, Chairperson Juracek closed the public heating and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members. As
there was no further discussion, Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a
request for a Variation for Case No. ZBA-15-01, to allow construction of an unenclosed porch addition that would
encroach into the exterior side yard setback for the residence at 418 S. NaWaTa Ave, with the condition that the porch
always remain unenclosed and no other portion of the building extend into the sideyard setback. Leo Floros seconded
the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Ettinger, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 4-0.
At 10:10 p.m., after hearing another case, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Leo Floros. The
motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
J~d~Con~ly, Senior PIanl~'
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 21, 2001
HEARING DATE: JUNE 28, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA-15-01 - VARIATION FOR AN UNENCLOSED PORCH
418 S. NAWATA AVE. (GEORGE RESIDENCE)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Thomas & Lisa George
418 S. NaWaTa Avenue
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
STATUS OF PETITIONER: Property Owners
PARCEL NUMBER: 08-11-401-020
LOT SIZE: 7,257 square feet
EXISTING ZONING: RA Single Family Residence
EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residence
LOT COVERAGE: 36% existing
37% proposed
50% maximum per RI district
REQUESTED ACTION: PROPOSAL FOR A VARIATION TO CONSTRUCT AN UNENCLOSED
PORCH IN THE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The subject property is an existing home located on a comer lot on a single-family residential street, at the comer
of NaWaTa and GoWanda Avenues. The home is currently set back 20.10 feet from Go Wanda Ave., but there is
a 9'x4' unenclosed porch/extended ent~3~way that encroaches into the 20-foot side yard. The front, along
NaWaTa Avenue, interior, and rear setbacks comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements. The applicant
proposes to construct an unenclosed'covered porch, as shown on the attached site plan. In order to do so, the
petitioner is seeking a variation to allow a 13.10-foot exterior yard, since the proposed porch will encroach
approximately 7-feet into the required yard.
tn 1991, the petitioner received a variation for 16.5-foot exterior side yard rather than the 20-feet required by the
Zoning Ordinance. The petitioner had recently purchased this kit and was building a new home. The Zoning
Board granted the setback variation in addition to height (26'4" when 24' max), and FAR (.367 FAR when .35
max) variations citing topography (this property has a lower grade) and narrowness of the lot as reasons for
approving the variations. The Zoning Ordinance has since changed and allows 28' tall buildings, .5 FAR and the
ZBA-15-01
ZBA Meeting of June 28, 2001
Page 2
property was rezoned in 1993 from R1 to PA. The subject property is~larger than the minimum lot size required
by the Zoning Ordinance and exceeds the minimum width required (code requires 50-feet and the subject property
measures 58' at the front setback). Therefore, the reasons for granting the previous variations are no longer
applicable to the subject property.
As illustrated on the attached plans, the porch would be attached to the area of the house that is used as the
entrance of the home and would be set back 13.1-feet from the property line. Unlike other requests for pomhes in
the side yard, the proposed porch would be the only modification to the house at this time. Similar to Condition
Use requests for a porch, the petitioners state in their application that the porch would be used as a gathering place
and not alter the character of the neighborhood.
The proposed unenclosed porch is different from other porches that received variation requests to be located in the
exterior side yard in that this pomh would extend further into the side yard and have a 13.1-foot setback whereas
the ZBA has previously approved 15-foot setbacks. Since the petitioner's request is more than 25% of what code
requires, the Village Board's decision is final for this request.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and
visited the site.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Variation Standards
Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These
standards relate to:
A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently
having an interest in the property;
cl lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
c~ protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The subject parcel is a 7,257 square foot parcel that is relatively level, out of any flood zone and rectangular. The
parcel is developed with a single family home and an attached garage. The applicant proposes to construct an
unenclosed covered porch in the exterior side yard setback.
The reasons for the proposed variation cited in the petitioner's application address aesthetics and how the porch
would not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. The applicant proposes the encroachment to provide an
unenclosed porch and create a gathering place. The proposed porch could enhance the character of the existing
single-family residential area and would not have a negative effect on the public welfare. However, no particular
condition of the lot justifies the proposed encroachment. Although the porch might meet the standards for a
Conditional Use applied to front yards, the request is required to meet the standards for a variation. Therefore,
there is not sufficient justification for ~ Variation by the above standards.
BA-15-01
ZBA Meeting of June 28, 2001
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION
Although the proposed variation could have a positive effect on neighborhood character, the submittal does not
support a finding of hardship, as requked by the Variation standards in Section 14.203~C.9 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village
Board to deny the proposed Variation to permit a unenclosed porch to encroach 7' into the required 20' exterior
side yard setback for the residence at 418 S. NaWaTa Avenue, Case No. ZBA-15-01. The Village Board's
decision is final for this case.
I concur:
~illu~m J.~C~:ney,~AICP~, l~irector of Community Development
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
I00 s. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328 - - -
FAX 847.818.5329
Variation Request
The Zoning Board of Appeals has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and
those variation requests that do not exceed twent~-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's
Zoning Ordinance.
PETITION FOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REVIEW [21 Village Board Final O ZBA Final
ICommon Address(es) (Street Number, Street) ........
Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Numb?(s~
z r~g- It - ¢01--02.0 - o0oo
~ Legal De~cril~tion (attach additional sheets if neces~sary)
:~ Name t Telephone (day)
~ Corporation ~J Telephone (evenmg) ...
:~ .o~ Street Address t~
~ <1 : City ' State Zip Code Pager ? ·
~ Interest in Proper/y
~ Nmne Telephone (day)
~ ~ Co.option ~ Telephone (even~g)
~ ~ S~eet Ad.ess F .
~ Ci~ S~te Zip Code : P~er
N~e Telephone (day)
Ad.ess F~
Attorney'
N~e Telephone (day)
Ad.ss F~
~ g Ad.ess Fax
Arehit~t
N~e Telephone (day~-~)
Lan~cape Architect
N~e Telephone (day):
Ad~ F~
Mount Prospect Depar~ent of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson S~'eet, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 Fax 847.818.5329
2 TDD 847.392.6064
ode Section(s) for which Variation(s) is (are) Requested
Summary and lusti.fication for Requested V,uiaiion(s), Reda:re lustification to the Attached Standards for Variations
I
'"
Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials
have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the
appropriate Village staffso that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal.
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given
to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the
property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours
for visual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby affirm that al/lAn~ormation provided herein and in
accurate to the best~df nff~knowled~e .__ all materials submitted in association with this application are tree and
If applicant is not proper~y owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my. agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the
associated supporting material.
Property Owner Date ~ ........ "· <' "'~ '" > '"'"'~ '"~ '.
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 Fax 847.818.5329
UL-O~-2001 Og:14A~ FRO~-PRO STAFF ~207050720 T-723 P.002/002 F-Olg
Mr. William J. Cooney %~} ~,I~
Director of Community Developmertt ·
VilLage of Mt. Prospect 1~
!
Re: ZBA-15-01
"V~tation For An Unenclosed Porch
418 S. Na-Wa-Ta Ave.
Dear Mr. Cooaey:
On July 17, 2001 the Village Board will consider our case, which was recently approved
tma,,~m.ously by the Zoning Board of Appeals. We respectfully request that the Village
Bom'd waives the requiremeat for a second reading of our case, and*.hat the first reading
be final. Thank you for your assistance and that o£ Judy Cormolly's.
Thomas W. Geoxge
7/2/01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 418 SOUTH NA-WA-TA AVENUE
WHEREAS, Thomas and Lisa George (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed
a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 418 S. NaWaTa Avenue
(hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"), legally described as follows:
Property Index Number: 08-11-401-020
Lot 10 on Block 20 in Prospect Park Country Club Subdivision, being a
Subdivision of the SE ¼ of Section 11 and the South 15 acres of the East ¼
of the NE ¼ of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the 3rd
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation to construct an unenclosed covered
porch that encroaches 7 feet into the required 20 foot exterior side yard; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Conditional Use being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 15-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 28th day of June, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13th day of June, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations
to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of
ZBA 15-01; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation would be in the
best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
418 S. NaWaTa Avenue
Page 2/2
.SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Variation for the construction of an unenclosed that encroaches seven
feet into the required 20 foot exterior side yard, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which
is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", with the condition that
only the porch show in Exhibit "A" encroach into the setback.
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:~CLKO\G EN\files\W[N'tO RDIN A NC~,Co n U se, 418 NaWaTa,p~rch, Jul 2001 ,doc
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 13, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA- 16-01 - CONDITIONAL USE (UNENCLOSED PORCH)
1006 ISABELLA
JEFF & KAREN CHAMBERLIN - APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve an unenclosed cover porch for Case
ZBA-16-01, but recommends that the Village Board deny the petitioners' request for a circular drive. The
attached ZBA staff report describes the petitioners' request and the minutes from the meeting summarize the case.
The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their June 28, 2001 meeting.
The subject property is an interior lot located in a single-family residential neighborhood. The petitioners would
like to raze the existing house and build a new ranch-style home with a side loading 3-car attached garage. The
footprint of the proposed home meets Zoning regulations but the unenclosed porch encroaches into the front
setback and requires Conditional Use approval. As part of the project, the petitioners would like to install a
cimular driveway, separate from the driveway that leads to the 3-car garage. The overall proposal exceeds lot
coverage by 718.35 square feet. Since the amount of proposed lot coverage is less than 25% of the maximum
permitted by code, the ZBA's decision was final for the lot coverage variation.
The Zoning Board discussed the petitioners' project and how the project could comply with Village code if the
circular drive was eliminated. The ZBA discussed alternative designs such as installing a service walk from the
driveway to the front of house or relocating the driveway as options that would meet the petitioners' desired
result, but comply with Zoning regulations. One neighbor addressed the Zoning Board: his concerns were based
on the petitioners' original submittal.
The ZBA members divided the case for property line at 1006 Isabella, Case No. ZBA-16-01, into three motions,
and voted:
1) 0-4 to approve a Variation for lot coverage (request denied - ZBA final);
2) 0-4 to recommend that the Village Board approve a Conditional Use for a circular drive (deny);
3) 4-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve a Conditional Use for an unenclosed covered
porch in the front setback (approve').
The petitioners have withdrawn their request for the circular drive and are seeking approval of a Conditional Use
to locate an unenclosed porch in the ~ront setback.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
July 17, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
William J. Cooney, Jr., AIt~P
MINUTES OF ~ REGULAR M~EETING OF TI-~
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-16-2001 Hearing Date: June 28, 2001
PETITIONER: Jeffery & Karen Chamberlin
1006 W. Isabella Street
PUBLICATION DATE: June 13, 2001 Journal~opics
REQUEST: Variation for lot coverage and Conditional Uses to allow construction of an
unenclosed porch and a circular driveway
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Keith Youngquist
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
INTERESTED PARTIES: Jeffery & Karen Chamberlin
Bogdan & Deborah Skoskiewicz
Marge Dybing
Kevin Kazimer
Juha & Anna Pentikainen
Chairperson Arlene Juraeek called the meeting to order at 7:47 p.m. The m'mutes of the May 24, 2001 meeting were
approved 4-0. At 9:03 p.m., after hearing five cases, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-16-01, a request for a
Variation for lot coverage and Conditional Uses to allow construction of an unenclosed porch and a circular driveway.
Judy Cormolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the subject
property is an existing home located in a single-family residential neighborhood on an interior lot on a local street.
The 17,765 square foot lot is relatively square in shape and meets the minimum lot size and width for the RX Zoning
District. She reported that the petitioners propose to raze the existing structure and build a one-story ranch-style home
with a 3-car, side-loaded garage. In addition, the petitioners propose to install a circular drive, separate from the 3-car
garage and an unenclosed, covered porch in a portion of the front setback. Ms. Connolly said the Chamberlins are
seeking relief from Zoning Ordinance requirements for the maximum amount of lot coverage permitted, in addition to
Conditional Use approval for the circular drive and the 4.5'x14' porch. The petitioners have been working to revise
their plans to be closer to code requirements than their original submittal, but still require relief from the Zoning
Ordinance. Ms. Connolly said, in order to conduct its analysis of the proposed circular drive and porch, staff reviewed
the petitioners' plat of survey and site plan, and visited the site. Although the Conditional Use requests are part of the
same proposed project, they are evaluated separately. In order to approve the Conditional Use requests, the proposal
must meet the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance, which Ms. Connolly reiterated to the Zoning Board. She
stated that, per Sec. 14.2215.A of the Zoning Ordinance, Conditional Use approval is required for circular driveways.
The circular drive would be constructed in the front of the proposed new home and would not be connected to the
driveway that leads to the garage. In their application, the petitioners state that the cimular drive is necessary because
the street is not as wide as other streets in the Village that have curbs and gutters and that street parking in front of their
home is limited and unsafe. By having people park on the circular drive and not in the street, the petitioners state that
the circular drive creates a safer enviroumunt for guests and people driving on Isabella. Ms. Connolly explained that
the subject property is located in an area of Mount Prospect with unimproved rights-of-way, with streets that typically
measure 22-23' in width. By constructing a circular drive, the petitioners are creating three curb cuts onto Isabella in
Zoning Board of Appeals ZI~A- 16-2001
Arlene Juracelc, Chairperson Page 2
addition to exceeding lot coverage, which requires a Variation. As shown on the petitioners' revised application, the
circular drive measures 762.4 square feet; the overall lot coverage for the site will exceed lot coverage by 718.3 square
feet. By eliminating the circular drive, the petitioner would not need a variation for lot coverage and the site would
meet Zoning regulations. Ms. Cormolly reported that staff evaluated data from the Records Division of the Police
Department and found that there were two parking complaints in the last six months. The data does not support the
safety claims as justification for the circular drive.
Ms. Connolly also reported that the applicants propose to construct a porch that extends 4.5-feet into the front setback.
As with other porches, the encroachment of the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the RX
district. The porch would not have a negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The
proposed Conditional Use would be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance
requirements. The single-family residential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the proposed
Conditional Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare.
Ms. Connolly said the petitioners could build a two-story house that covers less of the lot and meets Zoning
requirements but feel that that in doing so the character of the neighborhood would be adversely impacted. As part of
the new home, the petitioners propose to construct a side4oading garage and a circular drive, separate from the
driveway that leads to the garage. The proposed 3-car garage and driveway width meets Zoning requirements, but a
variation for lot coverage is required. As shown on the petitioners' calculations, the circular drive measures 762.4
square feet, bringing the site to 39% lot coverage while 35% is the maximum allowed in the RX Zoning District.
Ms. Connolly reviewed the findings that must be made in order to approve a variation..She pointed out that the size of
the subject parcel exceeds the 17,500 square foot minimum lot size required for the RX district. It is relatively level,
out of any flood zone and square in shape. She said the request does not meet the variation standards as set out in the
Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the lot coverage requirements could be met by eliminating the circular drive. That
circular drive, which creates the need for the variation, does not meet the standards for a Conditional Use. In addition,
the requested lot coverage variation does not support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in
Section 14:203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. The unenclosed porch, the second Conditional Use request, meets the
standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance for a Conditional Use. Ms. Connolly relayed staff's recommendation that the
ZBA deny the variation for 39% lot coverage (ZBA final) and make a recommendation to the Village Board to deny
the circular drive and approve the unenclosed porch to encroach 4.5-feet into the front setback for the residence at
1006 W. Isabella Street, Case No. ZBA-16-01. The Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use requests.
Jeffery and Karen Chamberlin, 1006 Isabella, and Kevin Kazimer, Architect, of 250 Victory Lane in Gumee, were
sworn in. Mr. Chamberlin said that he has been a lifelong resident of Mount Prospect and hsted the various addresses
he had lived in and the schools he had attended. He said he had purchased the home he lives in on a foreclosure and
planned to update and add to it to accommodate his future family. Mrs. Chamberlin moved here from Indianapolis
when they wed and they now have a 2-1/2 year old daughter. He said that they want to stay in their neighborhood
because it is just two blocks from the school their daughter will attend. They explored many avenues to redesign their
home to a larger, more modem style but were unable to arrive at an affordable design. They have been advised it
would be more feasible to raze the home and build anew. He explained that they did not want to build a two-story
home, which would tower over their neighbors' homes, because Mrs. Chamberlin's mother often visits and is
handicapped. Mr. Chambeflin also stated one of the reasons they wanted a circular drive was so Mrs. Chamberlin's
mother could more easily access the front door. He said they also wanted a circular drive as a means of preserving
several large old trees and to provide guest parking, which is not readily available at the curb because there is a fire
hydrant in front of the house. In addition, parking in the driveway that leads to the garage would not be convenient for
guests.
Mr. Chamberlin also presented graphs he had designed which detailed his sentiment that the R-X zoning was more
restrictive with respect to lot coverage than the other residential zonings.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-16-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairp~son Page 3
Ms. Jumcek asked if members of the audience wished to spea¢. Mr. Bogdan Skoskiewicz, 300 N. MacArthur Drive,
was sworn in. He voiced his objections to the Chamberlins' original submittal. He was most concerned that Mr.
Chamberlin would be engaged in a home occupation. Ms. Juracek explained that this hearing was not the forum to
discuss home occupations; just the porch, the circular drive, and the lot coverage variation. She advised Mr. Bogdan
how to pursue his concerns about the alleged home occupation.
At 9:56, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board members. As
there was no further discussion, Richard Rogers moved to approve the request for Variation for lot coverage at 39% for
the residence at 1006 W. Isabella Street, for Case No. ZBA-16-0. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES:
NAYS: Floros, Ettinger, Rogers, and Juracek
Motion was denied 4-0.
Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve the request for a Conditional Use to
altow~the construction of a circular driveway. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES:
NAYS: Floros, Ettinger, Rogers, and Juracek
Motion was denied 4-0.
Richard Rogers moved to make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve the request for a Conditional Use to
allow the construction of an unenclosed porch to encroach 4.5' into the front setback of the property at 1006 Isabella,
Case No. ZBA-16-01, with the condition that the porch would always remain unenclosed. Leo Floros seconded the
motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Ettinger, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS:
Motion was approved 4-0.
At 10:10 p.m., Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Leo Floros. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
o 3ni e or ¥1m ei
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 21, 2001
HEARING DATE: JUNE 28, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA- 16-01 - VARIATIONS & CONDITIONAL USES
1006 W. ISABELLA STREET (CHAMBER.LIN RESIDENCE)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Jeffery & Karen Chamberlin
1006 W. Isabella Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
STATUS OF PETITIONER: Property Owners
PARCEL NUMBER: 03-33-420-012
LOT SIZE: 17,765 square feet
EXISTING ZONING: RX Single Family Residence
EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residence
LOT COVERAGE: 20.6% existing / 39% proposed
35% maximum per R1 district
REQUESTED ACTION: VARIATION FOR LOT COVERAGE
CONDITIONAL USES FOR: 1) CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY
2) UNENCLOSED PORCH
BACKGROUND
The subject property is an existing home located in a single-family residential neighborhood on an interior lot on
a local street. The 17,765 square foot lot is relatively square in shape and meets the minimum lot size and width
for the PS< Zoning District. The petitioners propose to raze the existing structure and build a one-story home with
a 3-car, side-loaded garage. In addition, the petitioners propose to install a circular drive, separate from the 3-car
garage and an unenclosed, covered porch in a portion of the front setback. They are seeking relief from Zoning
Ordinance requirements for the maximum amount of lot coverage permit'ted in addition to Conditional Use
approval for the circular drive and the 4.5'x14' porch. The petitioners have been working to revise their plans to
be closer to code requirements than their original submittal, but still require relief from the Zoning Ordinance.
ZBA-16-01
ZBA Meeting of June 28, 2001
Page 2
PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USES
The petitioners propose to raze the existing house and construct a one-story ranch with an attached garage. As
part of the project, the petitioners would like to install a circular driveway and an unenclosed porch in the front
setback. To conduct its analysis of the proposed circular drive and porch, staff reviewed the petitioners' plat of
survey and site plan, and visited the site. Although the Condition Use requests are part of the same proposed
project, they are evaluated separately. In order to approve the Condition Use requests, the proposal must meet the
standards listed below, found in the Zoning Ordinance.
Required Findings: Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate
to:
The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare;
The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
c~ Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on
Village streets; and
cl Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Village Ordinances.
Circular Drive
Per Sec. 14.2215.A of the Zoning Ordinance, Conditional Use approval is required for circular driveways. The
circular drive would be constructed in the front of the proposed new home and would not be connected to the
driveway that leads to the garage. In their application, the petitioners state that the circular drive is necessary
. because the street is not as wide as other streets in the Village that have curbs and gutters and that street parking
in front of their home is limited and unsafe. By having people park on the circular drive and not in the street, the
petitioners state that the circular drive creates a safer environment for guests and people driving on Isabella.
The subject property is located in an area of Mount Prospect with unimproved right-of-ways, with streets that
typically measure 22-23' in width. By constructing a circular drive, the petitioners are creating three curb cuts on
to Isabella in addition to exceeding lot coverage, which requires a variation. As shown on the petitioners' revised
application, the circular drive measures 762.4 square feet; the overall lot coverage for the site will exceed lot
coverage by 718.3 square feet. By eliminating the circular drive, the petitioner would not need a variation for lot
coverage and the site will meet Zoning regulations. Staff evaluated data from the Records Division of the Police
Department and found that there were two parking complaints in the last six months. The data does not support
the safety claims as justification for the circular drive.
Porch
The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 17,765 square foot parcel that will be developed with a
one-story single family home. The ~tpplicants propose to construct a porch that extends 4.5-feet into the front
setback. As with other porches, the encroachment of the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional
Use in the ILK district.
The porch would not have a negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed
Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements.
The single-family residential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the proposed Conditional
Use, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare.
BA-16-01
ZBA Meeting of June 28, 2001
Page 3
PROPOSED VARIATIONS
The petitioners explain their masons for deciding to build a one-story ranch honse and note that they could build a
two-story house that covers less of the lot and meet Zoning requirements. They stress that in doing so, the
character of the neighborhood would be adversely impacted. As part of the new home, the petitioners propose to
construct a side-loading garage and a circular drive, separate from the driveway that leads to the garage. The
proposed 3--car garage and driveway width meets Zoning requirements, but a variation for lot coverage is
required. As shown on the petitioners' calculations, the circular drive measure 762.4 square feet, bringing the site
to 39% lot coverage while 35% is the maximum allowed in the RX Zoning Dis~ct.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and
visited the site.
Required Findings: Variation Standards
Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code. The section contains seven specific fmdinga that must be made in order to approve a variation. These
standards relate to:
A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently
having an interest in the property;
cl lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
cl protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The size of the subject parcel exceeds the 17,500 square foot minimum lot size required for the RX district. It is
relatively level, out of any flood zone and square in shape. The petitioners are seeking relief from lot coverage
requirements in order to construct a one-story ranch with an attached 3-car garage and circular drive. However,
the request does not meet the variation standards as set out in the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the lot coverage
requirements could be met by eliminating the circular drive (which was described earlier as not meeting Zoning
standards for a Conditional Use).
RECOMMENDATION
The circular drive, which creates the need for the variation, does not meet the standards for a Conditional Use. In
addition, the requested lot coverage variation does not support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation
standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. The unenclosed porch, the second Conditional Use
request, meets the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends
that the ZBA deny the variation for 39% lot coverage (ZBA final) and make a recommendation to the Village
Board to:
1) deny the circular drive
2) approve the unenclosed porch to encroach 4.5-feet into the front setback
for the residence at 1006 W. Isabella. Street, Case No. ZBA-16-01. The Village Board's decision is final for the
Conditional Use requests.
I concur:
William .~. ~ooney, AI(~P, Director of Community Development
FILE No. 545 06/12 '01 10:17 ID:CS~ DESIGN GROUP 84?9511885 F-~GE ~
June 12, 2OO1
Judy Connolly
Community Development Department
Village of ML Prospect
1OO S. Emerson
ML Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Revised Submission For ZBA-16-O1 (1OO6 W. Isabelb Street)
Dear Judy:
Pl'e~e find enclosed 10 copies of revisions to our submission For reques~ for variance and
conditional use approval for our home cons~uc~on FrojecL ~e ~llowbfl b a summaff oFthe
revi~ons:
Variation Request:
1. Section 14.802~.: Four Car Garage
We are deleting this variation request and will comply with the code requirement for a
maximum 3 car garage. The enclosed plan shows that we have deleted the 16'~O' wide
~arage door and provided an 8'-0" wide flar~e door.
2. Section 14.2215~3.: Driveway Width at Garage Doors
We are del~in~ this variation request and will comply with the code requirement for
m~imum of 32'-O" pavemen~ width a~ flar~ge doo~.
3. Section 14.8OS.C.: Lo~ Coverage
We are revising the ~mount of our variation request by redudng our lot coveraBe. We
have ~ane this by reducing the amoun~ o[ side drivewa~ pavement, reducing the width
the circle drivewaz, aad diminatinfl some of the rear patio coverage. Please see the
caicubtions on the encbsed plan.
Ap~li¢ation for CondiOonal Use Ap~roval:
1. Section 14.803~: Front Porch Encroachment into Setback
We orifllnally calculated ~he porch encroachment based o~ the house construction above
the porch which is 1'-11". We unders~nd the porch encroachment is calculated o~ the
concrete porch i~elfwhich is actually
2. Section 14.221S~1.: Circle Drivewa~
~/e have reduced the width oFthe circle driveway From ~2'-6
If you have any questions, please ca~L
3eft & Korea Chamberlin
98~-1880(w), 253~O990(h)
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
lO0 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847;818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Application for Conditional Use Approval
Case Number
ZBA
Development Name/Address
Date of Submission
Hearing Date
Addre~(es) (Street Number, Street)
Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site)
O, qO7 /~-× I~lq3,5
Setbacks:
Front Rear Side Side
/¢,Z7'
Building Height Coverage (%) Parking Spaces
Lot
Number
of
Adjacent Land Uses:
North South £ast West
Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
Legal Description (attach additional sheets if n~cessary)
Name Telephone (day)
Co~omtion Telephone (even~g)
S~eet Address
Ci~ State Zip Code Pager
Inte~st in Prope~
Proposed Cond. itional Use (as, listed in the zoning district)
Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary)
Houm of Operation
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
Io0
~_ Site Area (Acres) Total Buildin§ Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use
Property
Zoning
~ Sethaeks:
'~ Front Rear Side Side
~" - Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materiaB
have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the
petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness
at the time of submittal.
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given
to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the
property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter un the property during reasonable hour~
for visual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby affirm that ali infor~at~on provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and
If applicant is not property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act ~ my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the
associated supporting material.
Property Owner Date
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329
3 TDD 847.392.6064
' VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
lO0 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328:
FAX 847.818.5329
Variation Request
The Zoning Board of Appeals has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and
those variation requests that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's
Zoning Ordinance.
PETITION FOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REVIEW O Village Board Final O ZBA Final
Z .CaseNumber
.0 ZBA ~ .
Development Name/Address
r= u Date of Submission
~ Hearing Date
Common Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
Tax I.D. Number or CountY A~signed Pin Number(s)
Legal Description (amch additional sheets if necessary)
Name Telephone (day)
Co~oration Telephone (even~g)
S~eet Ad.ess F~
Ci~ State Zip Code Pager
Interest ~ Prope~
Code Section(s) for which Variation(s) is (are} Requested
Summ~ ~d Justification for Requested Y~iation(s), Relate Ju~ification to ~e A~ched S~d~ for V~a6ons '
Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials
have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the
appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal.
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given
to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the
property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours
for vLsual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby affirm that all informat)on~provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are tree and
accurate to the ~best of my knowledge. _
Applicant ~ Date
If applicant is not property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the
associated supporting material.
Property Owner Date
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328
I00 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 Fax 847.818.5329
3 TDD 847.392.6064
VARIATION REQUEST/APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
for
1OO6 W. ISABELLA STREET
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS REO_UE$'I~D
Variation Request: 1. Section 14.802.A.: Four Car Garage
2. Se~on 14.805.C.: Lot Coverage
3. Section 14.2215A.1.: Circle Driveway
4. Section 14.2215~.3.: Driveway Width at Garage Doors
Application for Conditional Use Approval:
1. Section 14.BO3~: Front Porch Encroachment into Setback
We have prepared this attachment to more fully describe why we are requesting variance and
conditional use for the above items for our personal residence. We have investigated other
possibilities and feel the project as submitted is the best long term solution for our Northwest
Meadows neighborhood and ourselves as a family.
Personal Histo .ry of' leiTrey C. Chambedin (property. owner)
Born in 1955 at 501 N. Pine St.
Moved to 309 N. Dale in Northwest Meadows in 1963.
Attended Fairview Elementary School K-6.
Attended Central Jr. High School.
Moved to 517 S. Wille in 1973.
Graduated from Prospect High Schoo[ in 1974.
Purchased home at 1OO6 W. Isabella St. in 1991.
Of 45 years, 31 have been ~Fent as a Mt. Prospect residenL
Married for 5-1/2 years to wife, Karen.
We have a 2-1/2 year old daughter, Kirsten.
We enjoy the neighborhood and the community and want to raise our family here.
Our 1950's house requires major remodeling to conform to today's different lifestyles.
Northwest Meadows SubDivision Histo .ry
Arthur T. Macintosh (of Inverness fame) development oflO2 homes.
CJI Zoned R-X for .large lots.
Developer intent was a sub-division of custom ranch homes on Y~ acre lots.
Originally, 95 o£102 homes were custom ranch homes. Non-ranch homes were (1) 2-story,
(4) split levels, and (2) Cape Cods (which look very similar to a ranch).
Q Of 6 major remodeling projects during past 10 years, 4 have been 2-story homes.
CJ There are many reasons for the trend away from the ranch home toward 2-story homes. They
include lower cost per square foot and the maximum lot coverage requirement - to construct, a
ranch home obviously covers more lot area than a 2-story. It has been our goat to construct a
custom ranch home if at all possible while maintaining neighborhood harmony.
Unique Lot
Our lot. is unique and its uniqueness has presented problems in reaching our ranch home goal
without requiring variances from the code.
1. Lot Size: Despite being developed as a sub-division of minimum ~A acre lots, certain lot
varied from this standard. Our lot is actually 0.407 acres, 19% smaller than the standard
Jot. We have the large lot R-X zoning and stringent lot coverage (max. 35%), but not the
lot size to go with it. If our plans as drawn (with 7,345 fL2 of lot coverage) were
submitted for construction on a ~A acre lot (21,780 fL2), we would not be asking for a
variance for lot coverage since we would be within the 35% limit (7;345 / 21,780 =
33.7%).
2. Lot Oimensionf: Our lot is only 110 feet deep on the east side. This is even shorter than
standard residential lots outside our sub-division which are 120 feet deep. Due to the
arrangement of the lots, our neighbor's lot behind us is also non-standard depth. (See
attached sub-division map.) The result is that our two houses are quite close together.
Whereas in other areas of Northwest Meadows (with typicat deep V~ acre lots) the homes
behind each other are 200 feet apart, our two homes are merely 70 feet aparL We
could construct a tall 2-story home without variance which would tower over our
neighbor's house. However, with our two houses so close together this would not be a
good thing for our neighbors, who are also our friends and original residents of the sub-
division. We are requesting a variance to construct a ranch home which is the right thin~
for them as weft as us.
3. Existing Trees: Our lot has mature trees which our influenced our design. We consulted
with both Sandy Clark, Village Forester, and Hendricksen Tree Experts during the design
of our plans. We don't want to lose our mature trees which include: Front Yard: 27"
diameter/65' tall Honey Locust, 18" diameter/S5' tall Pine, and 13" diameter/40 foot high
Norway Maple; Back yard: 23" diameter/50' tall Norway Maple. Our drawings include
'Tree Protection Notes" per the direction of Hendricksen trees to ensure these trees will
survive the construction process and continue to enhance the property.
Providing solutions to our unique circumstances requires us to request variances from the code.
1. Accessibilit?. Karen's mother is handicapped and her father has-had a quadruple b)'pass.
In the event something happened to him, she would need to live with us. As can be seen
by our plans, we have designed the home to have wide hallways and doorways which
requires more floor area. The guest room and bathroom are wheelchair accessible and
include a handicapped shower and handicapped water closeL We want to build a ranch
home with all the living areas on one level so she would have access to the entire house in
the event she were to live with us. If the home were to be a 2-story, she would be
confined to the first floor. Thinking toward the future, someday one of us ma), be in her
position and we would not have to sell the house if it is accessible.
2. Garage: Our design includes a 4 car side loaded garage which requires a variance. We
are sure our neighbors are as tired of looking at our cars in the driveway as we are in
having them there. Our lot's uniqueness provided us with the width to side load the
garage~ Our design calls for a single width driveway to serve the garage from the east
side of our IoL The garage is divided in half with the second half being o~et from the
first half. It is set behind our huge pine tree so it is not visible from the street. Even if it
were, only one of the 2 garage doors would be visible due to the setback of the second
door. The width of the pavement across the front of the garage requires a variance as well
because the limit of 32 feet of driveway width across the ~ront of the garage is based on a
3 car garage facing the street. Our driveway is actually less wide at its widest point (22'-
9" maximum) with our 4 car side loaded design than if the garage was only a 3 car but
facing the street (which we could construct without a variance). Our design provides for a
garage large enough for our needs, yet unobtrusive and hidden from street view.
4. Circular Drive: Our design includes a circular drive which requires a variance. Since we
have designed our side loaded driveway to be out of the way and unobtrusive, our design
calls for a circle drive for guest parking. Saving the existing 55' tall Pine tree and 65' tall
Honey Locust tree required us to locate the driveway to the garage at the far east edge of
the lot quite a distance from the front door. Street parking in front of our house is
limited and unsafe. It is limited since we have a fire hydrant centered on our lot. It is
unsafe for a couple reasons. Our street does not have curbs and gutters and is not as
wide as residential streets in other areas of the village which makes street parking for
visitors somewhat dangerous. In addition, our Jot is on a blind curve and it is just as
difficult for people exiting a parked car to see cars approaching as it is {or approaching
cars to see parked cars, Finally, in the event Karen's handicapped mother came to live with
us, we would wan~. to drop her offas close to the front door as possible and the circle
drive would make that possible. For the safety of our guests, the safety people driving on
our street, and our possible ~uture needs, we feel a circle drive is the best solution.
5. Covered Front, Porch: Finally, we are requesting a conditional use approval {or our
covered front porch design which encroaches into the front setback by 1'-11". This is much
less than the 5'-O" maximum which could be approved. The porch encroachment is due
to the lack of depth of the lot discussed previously.
e understand and appreciat.e that. many hours of time and effort were spent, writing the codes
with the best. interest, of Me commu.nit.,v and neighborhood in mind. We have also spent, man),
hours in consideration of what. solutions we could provide on our lot. that. would serve our needs
and be in harmon), with the neighborhood. We have come t.o the conclusion that. if'we were t.o
adhere stzictJ), t.o the code and const.ruct, a 2-st. ory home of size which we could do without.
variance, we would not. be providing a solution that. w~s in the best. interest, of the communit.), and
neighborhood. We feel that. our plans with variances request.ed present, t. he best. solution ~or our
unique lot. in our neighborhood.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeffrey C. and Karen D. Chamberlin
1006 W. Isabella St.
REVISIONS TO ZBA-16-01 - LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION
, .,~q~: ~ ..
' "c.~r~-:m,
"' ~6,". ~..~..'~ .......
SITE PLAN- NEW WORK
gu E Property located at:
Legally described c~s:
S
SOU~H~AST£~L y
State o~ Illinois)
County of Cook) ss.
Michael J. Emme~ Suweys, Inc., does hereby certify tha~ we have su~eyed ~he above
described property and prepar~J ~he plat hereon drawn. ~e legal description shown ~'"'""
hereon is provided by o~he~s. Refe~ ~o deed or title ~licy for building setbacks,
~sements or o~her restrictions which may exist. Dimensions not noted hereon shall not
b~ assumed by scaling o~ otherwise. This office shall no~ be responsible for future
construction unless all prope~y corners are established by this'office. ~ "'
Dated this. ~ . day of ~ 199 ~ . Michael J. Em~
115 ~st P
, , ~ ~ ~ , , , Palatine~ Illino
12 12 LINE INDtCATFr..5
E RET ~ , ~ ...... ~-I I/B~ PLATE
........................... I~10~ ~ AT TO~
FROtl ':' Ot= LIVING ROOU
12/1210
SOUTH
V4~ ~ I~..0~
!
:EILING
~ /--5/4xB R5 CEDAR 51DE TRIU BD J
Kad
07/05/2001
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY
GENERALLY KNOWN AS 1006 W. ISABELLA STREET
WHEREAS, Jeffery C. Chamberlin (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition
for a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 1006 W. Isabella, (hereinafter
referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
Property Index Number 03-33-420-012
Lot 8 in Block 4 in Arthur T. Mclntosh and Co.'s NW Meadows, a subdivision of the
E ~ of Sec. 33, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the 3'~ Principal Meridian, in
Cook County, IL.;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use to construct an unenclosed porch
encroaching four and one half feet (4~5') into the required front yard setback; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 16-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
th
Prospect on the 28 day of June, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
th
published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13 day of June, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and positive
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being
the subject of ZBA 16-01; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be
in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Page 2/2
1006 W. Isabella Street
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Conditional Use, as provided for in Section 14.203. F.7 of the Village
Code, to allow the construction of an unenclosed porch encroaching four and a half feet
(4.5') into the required front yard setback, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVEDthis day ~ ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\GEN\fiIes\WIN\ORDINANC\C.USE.16-01 1006 W. Isabella.doc
I/1~==1~.0~
/
uly 13, 2001
Judy Connolly
Community Development Department
Village of MC Prospect
1OO S. Emerson
MC Prospect, IL 60056
Re: ZBA-16-O1 (1OO6 W. Isabella Street)
Dear Judy:
We apologize for the confusion regarding our conditional use request for the circular drive. We
would like the Vi[la.qe Board to consider our conditional use request for a circular drive at the July
17~ meeting. We understand that the installation of the circular drive would require the redesign
of our project to meet the 35% lot coverage requirement for RX lots.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
Karen D. Chamberlin
1OO6 W. Isabella St.
Kad
07/05/2001
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1006 ISABELLA STREET
WHEREAS, Jeffrey Chamberlin (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition
for a Conditional Use permit, with respect to property located at 1006 Isabella Street,
(hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
Property Index Number: 03-33-420-012
Lot 8 in Block 4 in Arthur T. Mclntosh and Co.'s NW Meadows, a subdivision of the
E ¼ of Sec. 33, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the 3~ Principal Meridian,
in Cook County, IL.
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to construct a circular driveway;
and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 16-01, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 28~ day of June, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 13th day of June, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and negative
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the request being the subject
of ZBA 16-01; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be
in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Page 2/2
1006 Isabella Street
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit, as provided for in Section 14.203.F.7 of the
Village Code, to allow the construction of a circular driveway, as shown on the Site Plan,
a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVEDthis dayof ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
C:\TMP\C.USE.16-01 1006 Isabella Street circular drive,doc
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: FO~STRY / GRO~DS SUPE~TE~ENT
DATE: ~LY 12, 2001
SUBJECT: ~VISED ~ION PACIFIC BEAUT~ICATION LEASE
Union Pacific Railroad Comply is seeing ~e execution of a revised Railroad ~t-of-Way
L~dscape Beautification Lease, governing plating ~d m~nten~ce activities on their right-of-way.
Anached is a copy of the lease doc~ent ~d specifications. I request ~at the Village Bo~d review
these doc~ents at the July 17, 2001 Bo~d meeting, ~d authorize execution of this lease.
BACKGRO~D
From 1984 ~ou~ 1990, ~e Village spent over $100,000 to beauti~ the foyer Chicago ~d
No,western ~ilroad Right-of Way with extensive l~dscape pl~t~gs. We received several local
~d national aw~ds for this effo~. We continue to spend thous~ds of doll,s ~u~ly to maintain ~is
~ea because it is a major ~affic condor in o~ to~. Thus its appellee ~eatly influences Mo~t
Prospect's public image.
~ 1997, we received word from the new owner, Union Pacific, ~at our previous beautification lease
with Chicago ~d No~hwestem was out of ~te and would be c~celled. Additionally, they advised us
that m~y of the ~ees ~d s~bs we had plated on ~e fi~t-of-way would need removal or pmn~g
because ~ey were in violation of Union Pacific re~lations ~or state law. ~e state law, desired
to reduce sight obs~uctions, states ~at "Eve~ r~l c~ier operating within this state shall remove ~om
its fi~t-of-way at all ~ade crossings within the state, such brash, s~bbe~ ~d ~ees as is reasonably
practic~ for a dis~ce of not less th~ 500 feet in eider direction from each ~ade crossing."
Union Pacific also related that their comply roles required a 16 foot cle~ zone, as measured ~om the
outside edge of~e railroad ties, into which no pl~t mate~al could ~ow for the entire len~ of the
railroad fi~t-of-way. They claimed that this was necess~y so their engineers could readily view all
si~s ~d sisals placed ~ong ~e ~aeks.
~ late 1997, we met with Union Pacific staff ~d a~eed to initially remove or p~e a number of
platings, including most of the Mo~t Prospect Road En~ce M~ker l~dscap~g, which ~ey felt
constituted the most obvious obs~ctions. Additionally, we reminded Union Pacific that all platings
~om 100 feet west of Main S~eet to 100 feet east of Emerson S~eet had been approved by the Illinois
Co~erce Commission (ICC) ~er ~ extensive public he~ng in 1985.
In May 1998, representatives from Union Pacific, the ICC, and the Village inspected every Union
Pacific railroad crossing in Mount Prospect. We jointly agreed that the Village would remove or prune
down to three feet, many more plantings within 300 feet of the crossings, which Union Pacific and the
ICC deemed to be "material obstructions". We also agreed to relocate the Mount Prospect Road
Entrance Marker sign 300 feet to the west. Additionally, we were told we would need an ICC
Exemption Order to retain the plantings growing 300-500 feet from crossings.
At that time Union Pacific asked again that we execute a new beautification lease. We responded by
sending them additional proposed modifications, which we felt reflected the on-site agreements made
in May. We worded the proposed lease specifications to allow different standards for new versus
existing plantings.
By August 1998 we had completed all requested removals and pruning, as well as the sign relocation.
A total of 65 trees and shrubs had been removed and hundreds of additional trees and shrubs were
pruned, at Union Pacific's request.
In April 1999, I learned that we would need to take the following steps in order to finally resolve the
remaining issues.
1. Send a landscape plan showing all existing and future plantings to Union Pacific for their approval.
2. Negotiate the temas of the beautification lease with Union Pacific's legal department. (They told
me they would be responding to the changes we had proposed.)
3. If Union Pacific agrees with our landscape plan and proposed lease, submit both to the ICC, along
with a petition prepared by Union Pacific. If the ICC agrees, they would then issue a declaratory
order allowing our plantings without a formal hearing.
4. If we cannot come to terms with either Union Pacific or the ICC in the above steps, a formal ICC
heating would need to be scheduled.
On November 16, 1999 the proposed lease and modifications were signed by our Village Board and
submitted to the Union Pacific. However, since some of our proposed modifications differed from the
generic lease document that the Union Pacific had created, our presence was requested at a formal ICC
hearing.
On May 21, 2001 the ICC hearing took place in Chicago. Those representing the Village were
Attorney's Jim Wargo, Lance Malina, Public Works Director Glen Andler and myself. Also in
attendance were Union Pacific and ICC representatives.
DISCUSSION
Overall, we feel that the heating was successful. Our landscape plan, showing the planned new
landscaping near the Train Station, was accepted by Union Pacific and the ICC at the heating.
he Railroad Landscape Beautification Lease itself was easily accepted by all entities since we did not
have any proposed changes to the main body. Sections 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of the previously approved
(November 16th) specifications were agreed to without change.
The wording agreed to at the May 21st ICC hearing regarding Sections 1, 2, 4 10 and 11 is detailed
below:
· Section 1 has been modified so that we will follow Union Pacific's new requirements (restricting
installation of plants into the zone, 16 feet from the edge of the outside tie) for any new plantings,
but will abide by the old standard (maintaining trees and shrubs 15 feet from the center of the
outside tracks), for existing plantings.
Section 2 has been modified to allow different standards for new versus existing plantings in
regards to sight obstructions at crossings. We would not install new plant materials which will grow
more than three feet above the height of the adjacent ties, within 500 feet of any grade crossifig.
However, as stated in Section 10 we would maintain existing plant material within the 500' grade
crossing as agreed to in the ICC Order that resulted from the hearing.
· Section 4 has been modified so that a flagman is not required for routine maintenance work such
as mowing and weeding. However, a flagman would be required for all other work and at the
Village's expense. Union Pacific has borne the expense ora flagman when we have requested one
for special projects in the past. However, we agreed to give up this request, although we will plan
to ask Union Pacific to voluntarily donate the cost of the flagman for future projects.
· Section 10 is the new language we added which officially recognizes that the plantings installed
around the train station were already exempted by the ICC in 1985. The ICC and Union Pacific
have agreed to this new section, along with the additional wording regarding new and existing
plant material within the 500 foot restriction at grade crossings and in front of the train station.
· Section 11 is new language we added which states that any existing landscaping shall be allowed
to be replaced in kind with prior notice and approval from Union Pacific.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend approval on Suly 17, 2001 ora resolution authorizing execution of thc attached lease
document including the specifications listed as part of this document. This will then be sent to Union
Pacific and finally to the Illinois Commerce Commission for final execution.
Sandy Clark
I concur: ~
/' Glen 1~. Andler
Public Works Director
X:FILES/FORESTRY/WORD/2001/MEMO-RR-LEASE.DOC
RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAX
LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION T~SE
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (hereinafter called
"Company") hereby leases to the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS (hereinafter called "Lessee") to use for
planting, pruning and otherwise maintaining landscaping
("Landscape Beautification") the entire Union Pacific right-of-
way in Mount Prospect, Illinois, subject to the express term and
conditions of this Lease, the Specifications (the
"Specifications") attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby made a
part hereof, and a Landscape Beautification Plan attached hereto
as Exhibit B and hereby made a part hereof (the "Premises").
This Lease (the "Lease") shall become effective
, 2001 and shall run for a period of one year
and thereafter unless terminated as hereinafter provided.
Lessee agrees to pay Company as rent for the Premises the
sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) per year payable annually
in advance. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the terms and
conditions of any other agreement between Company and Lessee for
use of Company's right-of-way or any portion of the Premises for
. . other than. Landscape Beautification~
This Lease is given upon the following express terms and
conditions herein and the Specifications and Landscape
Beautification Plan as finally authorized by the Illinois
Commerce Commission (the "ICC Authorized Specifications") and
should the Lessee at any time violate any of said terms,
conditions or the ICC Authorized Specifications, or use or
attempt to use the Premises for any other or different purpose
than that stated herein, then the Company may, at its option,
immediately terminate this Lease.
As a material consideration for entering into this Lease and
without which Company would not enter into same, Lessee covenants
and agrees to indemnify, save harmless and protect the Company
and the Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Railway Authority
("Metra") from and against any and all loss, damage, injury,
claim, demand, fine, lawsuit, judgment and/or liability, and any
and all costs, expenses and legal fees in connection therewith by
reason of injuries to or death of persons and/or loss of or
damage to property and/or violation of any law, ordinance or
regulation ("Claim") to the extent such Claim arises out of or is
connected with Lessee's Landscape Beautification of the Premises
or any act or omission of (i) Lessee, its officers, employees,
contractors, or agents, and/or (ii) and other person(s)
performing any work or service for or on behalf of the Lessee on
or about said Premises or arising out of their presence on said
Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall not be
obligated to indemnify and hold harmless Company and Metrg for
personal injury, death and/or property damage to the extent
arising out of the acts or omissions of the Company, Metra or the
officers, employees, agents or contractors of either the Company
or Metra.
Company reserves the right to use, occupy and enjoy the
Premises and its tracks, property and right-of-way, for such
purpose, in such manner, and at such time as it shall desire, the
same as if this instrument had not been executed by it, including
the right to lease or license any of the Premises for commercial
or industrial purposes without any prior notification to Lessee.
Lessee accepts the Premises subject to the rights of any
party, including Company, in and to any existing roadway,
easements, permits or licenses. Lessee further accepts the
Premises subject to rights of any party, including Company, in
and to any existing telephone, telegraph, or other wires, and
poles and facilities of any kind whatsoever, whether or not of
record.
Company reserves the right to maintain or relocate its
existing facilities, or to' construct and thereafter maintain new
facilities, in the vicinity of the Premises with no liability for
damages to Lessee's interests or Premises resulting from such
beautification activities.
Lessee recognizes and assumes all responsibility for all
present and future environmental liability or responsibility
imposed under applicable environmental laws, regulations or any
other similar requirements relating to any contamination of the
Premises or groundwater thereunder or discharge or release to
adjacent property arising from or in any respect aggravated or
altered by any operations or activities by, or any equipment or
facilities used by or permitted on the Premises by Lessee in
performance of Landscape Beautification (the foregoing
hereinafter referred to as "Lessee Landscape Beautification
Operations"). Lessee, therefore, agrees to indemnify and hold
harmless Company, its officers, agents, and employees from any
and all liability, fines penalties, claims, demands, loss or
lawsuits brought by any third party or governmental agency under
any theory of law against Company seeking to hold Company liable
for any investigation, response or cleanup costs, penalties or
damages, whether personal property or environmental, for any
contamination of any property or groundwater thereunder or
discharge or release to adjacent property arising out of or in
any respect aggravated or altered by Lessee Landscape
Beautification Operations. Lessee agrees that the above
indemnity extends to any liability resulting from or arising out
of Lessee's implementation of any investigation, response or
cleanup plan approved by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency or companion state agency. Lessee further
agrees to undertake at its own expense any investigation,
response or cleanup of any contamination of the Premises and
groundwater thereunder arising from or in any respect aggravated
or altered by any Lessee Landscape Beautification Operation and
to promptly notify Company of any event, notice, claim, demand or
litigation which involves or alleges contamination of the
Premises, the groundwater thereunder or a discharge or release
therefrom to adjacent property. Lessee agrees to waive any and
all statutes of limitations applicable to any controversy or
dispute arising out of this paragraph, and Lessee further agrees
that it will not raise or plead a statute of limitations defense
against Company in any action arising out of Lessee's failure to
comply with this paragraph.
Company, its agents, employees and authorized contractors
shall have the right to enter the Premises or any part thereof,
at all reasonable hours, for the purpose of inspecting the
Premises to determine if Lessee is complying with all terms and
conditions of this Lease and/or to determine through inspection
and/or testing if any hazardous condition, pollution or
contamination is present or threatened. Lessee agrees to
cooperate with Company in any such inspection and to provide at
Company's request any and all permits, reports, or records of any
kind, relating to any materials used, stored, treated or disPOsed
of on the Premises.
Either party hereto shall have the right at any time to
cancel this Lease by giving ten (10) days' notice in writing. At
the expiration for the time limited by said notice, the Lessee
shall promptly, and in the manner directed by company, restore
the Premises to the condition it was in prior to the leasing of
same. Upon default of the Lessee to do so, the Company may
accomplish the same and so restore the Premises, and the Lessee
will promptly pay to the Company for the cost and expense of such
restoration. In addition, at termination Lessee shall provide
evidence, reasonably satisfactory to Company, that the condition
of the Premises and all improvements thereon attributable to the
acts and/or omissions of Lessee during the term of this Lease
comply with all applicable laws, regulations and standards. ~
IN WITNESS ~mREOF, the parties have executed these presents
on , 2001.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
By: By:
Title: Title:
Municipal Clerk
By:
(Municipal Seal)
Title:
Resolution/Ordinance number
4
EXI-IlRIT A
SPECIFICATIONS
1. No planting or other landscaping material, installed after the date of this lease becomes
effective, shall be allowed within 16 feet of the edge of the nearest tie nor allowed to grow
into this zone other than grass or ground cover, which will not grow in excess ofthree (3)
feet in height.
Plantings installed prior to that date, except for grass or ground cover which will not grow
in excess of three (3) feet in height, shall be maintained so that they do not grow any closer
than 15t from the center oftbe outside rail.
2. Any planting or other landscape material, installed after the date this lease becomes effective,
on the railroad right-of-way within 500 feet of any grade crossing shall be maintained so as
not to exceed a height of three (3) feet above the adjacent ties;
3. Any grading or future planting done on Company's property must be approved in writing by
Company's Engineering Department located at 500 West Madison, Suite 3610, Chicago,
Illinois 60661.
· 4. Except for routine landscape maintenance such as mowing, weeding, etc., any work done on
Company's property closer than 16 feet from the edge of the nearest tie will require a flagrnan.
The flagman will be provided by Company at Lessee's expense.
5. There is to be no interference with Company facilities, including pole lines, drainage
structures and signal apparatus.
6. There is to be no adverse effect to vis~ility or drainage on Company property.
7. Lessee shall not construct or permit to be constructed any building, structure, excavation or
any other obstruction without the written consent of Company's Engineering Department.
8. The Union Pacific l~ailroad Company will not, in any way, share in the cost of landscaping
or for any improvements to the area covered by this lease.
9. The Union Pacific Railroad Company will not be responsible for any damage to the
landscaping or improvements.
EXHIBIT A
SPECIFICATIONS
10. Plantings which were installed in the area 100' west of Main Street and 100' east of
Emerson Street, as shown on the approved landscape plan, shall be maintained as per the
ICC Exemption order dated April 10, 1985. In addition, all plantings which were
previously installed or will be installed as shown on the landscape plan incorporated into
the Lease Agreement as EXHIBIT B, including those plantings within 500 feet of any
grade crossing, shall be allowed to ren~aln and shall be maintained as per the ICC Order
that results fi.om the Hearing in the Petition entitled Village of Mount Prospect v. Union
Pacific Railroad Company, Docket No. T01-0002, conducted on May 21, 2001.
11. Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of these Specifications, existing landscaping as the date of
the Lease shall be allowed to be replaced in kind with prior notice and approval fi.om the
Union Pacific Railroad Company.
07/09/2001
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION LEASE
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is desirous of entedng into a lease agreement with Union
Pacific Railroad Company for railroad right-of-way landscape beautification; and
WHEREAS, such lease will allow the Village of Mount Prospect to plant and maintain vegetation on
the Union Pacific right-of-way within the corporate limits of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Viilage of Mount Prospect do hereby
authorize execution of a Lease Agreement between Union Pacific Railroad Company and the Village
of Mount Prospect for railroad right-of-way landscape beautification within the corporate boundaries
of the Viltage, and said Lease shall be for a period of one (1) year and thereafter, unless terminated
as hereinafter provided as set forth in the Lease, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof as Exhibit A.
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\C LKO\GEN\fi[es\WIN\R ES\LEAS E.train. R OWbeautification2001 ,doc
RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAX
LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (hereinafter called
"Company") hereby leases to the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS (hereinafter called "Lessee") to use for
planting, pruning and otherwise maintaining landscaping
("Landscape Beautification") the entire Union Pacific right-of-
way in Mount Prospect, Illinois, subject to the express term and
conditions of this Lease, the Specifications (the
"Specifications") attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby made a
part hereof, and a Landscape Beautification Plan attached hereto
as Exhibit B and hereby made a part hereof (the "Premises").
This Lease (the "Lease") shall become effective
· 2001 and shall run for a period of one year
and thereafter unless terminated as hereinafter provided.
Lessee agrees to pay Company as rent for the Premises the
sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) per year payable annually
in advance. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the terms and
conditions of any other agreement between Company and Lessee for
use of Company's right-of-way or any portion of the Premises for
other than Landscape Beautificationl
This Lease is given upon the following express terms and
conditions herein and the Specifications and Landscape
Beautification Plan as finally authorized by the Illinois
Commerce Commission (the "ICC Authorized Specifications") and
should the Lessee at any time violate any of said terms,
conditions or the ICC Authorized Specifications, or use or
attempt to use the Premises for any other or different purpose
than that stated herein, then the Company may, at its option,
immediately terminate this Lease.
As a material consideration for entering into this Lease and
without which Company would not enter into same, Lessee covenants
and agrees to indemnify, save harmless and protect the Company
and the Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Railway Authority
("Metra") from and against any and all loss, damage, injury,
claim, demand, fine, lawsuit, judgment and/or liability, and any
and all costs, expenses and legal fees in connection therewith by
reason of injuries to or death of persons and/or loss of or
damage to property and/or violation of any law, ordinance or
regulation ("Claim") to the extent such Claim arises out of or is
connected with Lessee's Landscape Beautification of the Premises
or any act or omission of (i) Lessee, its officers, employees,
contractors, or agents, and/or (ii) and other person(s)
performing any work or service for or on behalf of the Lessee on
or about said Premises or arising out of their presence on said
Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall not be
obligated to indemnify and hold harmless Company and Metrg for
personal injury, death and/or property damage to the extent
arising out of the acts or omissions of the Company, Metra 'or the
officers, employees, agents or contractors of either the Company
or Metra.
Company reserves the right to use, occupy and enjoy the
Premises and its tracks, property and right-of-way, for such
purpose, in such manner, and at such time as it shall desire, the
same as if this instrument had not been executed by it, including
the right to lease or license any of the Premises for commercial
or industrial purposes without any prior notification to Lessee.
Lessee accepts the Premises subject to the rights of any
party, including Company, in and to any existing roadway,
easements, permits or licenses. Lessee further accepts the
Premises subject to rights of any party, including Company, in
and to any existing telephone, telegraph, or other wires, and
p61es and facilities of any kind whatsoever, whether or not of
record.
Company reserves the right to maintain or relocate its
existing facilities, or to' construct and thereafter maintain new
facilities, in the vicinity of the Premises with no liability for
damages to Lessee's interests or Premises resulting from such
beautification activities.
Lessee recognizes and assuraes all responsibility for all
present and future environmental liability or responsibility
imposed under applicable environmental laws, regulations or any
other similar requirements relating to any contamination of the
Premises or groundwater thereunder or discharge or release to
adjacent property arising from or in any respect aggravated or
altered by any operations or activities by, or any equipment or
facilities used by or permitted on the Premises by Lessee in
performance of Landscape Beautification (the foregoing
hereinafter referred to as "Lessee Landscape Beautification
Operations"). Lessee, therefore, agrees to indemnify and hold
harmless Company, its officers, agents, and employees from any
and all liability, fines penalties, claims, demands, loss or
lawsuits brought by any third party or governmental agency under
any theory of law against Company seeking to hold Company liable
for any investigation, response or cleanup costs, penalties or
damages, whether personal property or environmental, for any
contamination of any property or groundwater thereunder or
discharge or release to adjacent property arising out of or in
any respect aggravated or altered by Lessee Landscape
2
Beautification Operations. Lessee agrees that the above
indemnity extends to any liability resulting from or arising out
of Lessee's implementation of any investigation, response or
cleanup plan approved by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency or companion state agency. Lessee further
agrees to undertake at its own expense any investigation,
response or cleanup of any contamination of the Premises and
groundwater thereunder arising from or in any respect aggravated
or altered by any Lessee Landscape Beautification Operation and
to promptly notify Company of any event, notice, claim, demand or
litigation which involves or alleges contamination of the
Premises, the groundwater thereunder or a discharge or release
therefrom to adjacent property. Lessee agrees to waive any and
all statutes of limitations applicable to any controversy or
dispute arising out of this paragraph, and Lessee further agrees
that it will not raise or plead a statute of limitations defense
against Company in any action arising out of Lessee's failure to
comply with this paragraph.
Company, its agents, employees and authorized contractors
shall have the right to enter the Premises or any part thereof,
at all reasonable hours, for the purpose of inspecting the
Premises to determine if Lessee is complying with all terms and
conditions of this Lease and/or to determine through inspection
and/or testing if any hazardous condition, pollution or
contamination is present or threatened. Lessee agrees to
cooperate with Company in any such inspection and to provide at
Company's request any and all permits, reports, or records of any
kind, relating to any materials used, stored, treated or disposed
of on the Premises.
Either party hereto shall have the right at any time to
cancel this Lease by giving ten (10) days' notice in writing. At
the expiration for the time limited by said notice, the Lessee
shall promptly, and in the manner directed by company, restore
the Premises to the condition it was in prior to the leasing of
same. Upon default of the Lessee to do so, the Company may
accomplish the same and so restore the Premises, and the Lessee
will promptly pay to the Company for the cost and expense of such
restoration. In addition, at termination Lessee shall provide
evidence, reasonably satisfactory to Company, that the condition
of the Premises and all improvements thereon attributable to the
acts and/or omissions of Lessee during the term of this Lease
comply with all applicable laws, regulations and standards.
3
IN WITNESS W-mREOF, the parties have executed these presents
on , 2001.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
By: By:
Title: Title:
Municipal Clerk
By:
(Municipal Seal)
Title:
Resolution/Ordinance number
EXltlBIT A
SPECIFICATIONS
1. No planting or other landscaping material, installed atter the date of this lease becomes
effective, shall be allowed within 16 feet of the edge of the nearest tie nor allowed to grow
into this zone other than grass or ground cover, which will not grow in excess of three (3)
feet in height.
Plantings installed prior to that date, except for grass or ground cover which will not grow
in excess of three (3) feet in height, shall be maintained so that they do not grow any closer
than 15' fxom the center of the outside rail.
2. Any planting or other landscape material, installed after the date this lease becomes effective,
on the railroad right-of-way within 500 feet of any grade crossing shall be maintained so as
not to exceed a height of three (3) feet above the adjacent ties.
3. Any grading or future planting done on Company's property must be approved in writing by
Company's Engineering Departmem located at 500 West Madison, Suite 3610, Chicago,
Illinois 60661.
· 4. Except for routine landscape maintenance such as mowing, weeding, etc., any work done on
Company's property closer than 16 feet fxomthe edge of the nearest tie will require a flagmam
The flagman will be provided by Company at Lessee's expense.
5. There is to be no interference with Company facilities, including pole lines, drainage
structures and signal apparatus.
6. There is to be no adverse effect to vis~ility or drainage on Company property.
7. Lessee shall not construct or permit to be constructed any building, structure, excavation or
any other obstruction without the written consent of Company's Engineering Department.
8. The Union Pacific Railroad Company will not, in any way, share in the cost of landscaping
or for any improvements to the area covered by this lease.
9. The Union Pacific Railroad Company will not be responsible for any damage to the
landscaping or improvements.
EXHIBIT A
SPECIFICATIONS
I 0. Plantings which were installed in the area 100' west of Main Street and 100' east of
Emerson Street, as shown on the approved landscape plan, shall be maintained as per the
ICC Exemption order dated April 10, 1985. In addition, all plantings which were
previously installed or will be installed as shown on the landscape plan incorporated into
the Lease Agreement as EXHIBIT B, including those plantings within 500 feet of any
grade crossing, shall be allowed to remain and shall be maintained as per the ICC Order
that results from the Hearing in the Petition entitled Village of Mount Prospect v. Union
Pacific Railroad Company, Docket No. T01-0002, conducted on May 21, 2001.
11. Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of these Specifications, existing landscaping as the date of
the Lease shall be allowed to be replaced in kind with prior notice and approval from the
Union Pacific Railroad Company.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER
DATE: JULY §, 200,
SUBJECT: JUNE safety COMMISSION ReCOMMeNDATION -
FINAL CONSIDERATION Of PERMANENT CURB eXTeNSIONS AROUND
liONS PARK ELEMEntARY SCHOOL
The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to
remove the temporary curb extensions along with the yellow striping and that
no further action related to traffic calming take place at this location at this
time.
Per the direction of the Safety Commission and Village Board of Trustees, Village Staff was
asked to restudy the effect of the temporary traffic calming measures, in the form of curb
extensions, at two locations around Lions Park Elementary School. In addition, the opinions
of those who live in the area as well as the school were solicited to determine if permanent
curb extensions should be installed later this summer.
Staff made the following conclusions based on the restudy:
1. The curb extensions appear to have enhanced pedestrian safety by reducing the
crossing distance and time it takes to cross the street. They have also helped in
reducing the potential for vehicles to park near the intersection.
2. Motorists appear to have some difficulty maneuvering around the curb extension at
School Street. Any type of permanent curb extension should be easy to negotiate while
influencing motorists to proceed cautiously. The curb extensions should not detract
motorists from being aware of pedestrians.
3. The curb extensions do not appear to have made a significant positive impact on driver's
behavior. At School Street, the extension is 7' wide. At Elm Street, the extension is only
3' wide. Council Trail, though a collector street, is only wide enough to handle three
vehicles side by side. On wider streets, the curb extensions would be ~arger and,
therefore, motorists would probably perceive the street to be much narrower thus greater
affecting their behavior.
4. Both the previous survey and the latest survey show a majority of residents, parents and
motorists not in favor of permanent curb extensions. Most comments received indicated
either the temporary curb extensions had either no impact or made it a worse situation.
Page two...
June Safety Commission Meeting
July 5, 2001
5. The cost of the permanent curb extensions was discussed at length during the March
Safety Commission Meeting. It is Staff's opinion that a significant benefit ought to be
observed during a study to justify the cost. The cost of permanent curb extensions along
Council Trail has been estimated around $20,000.
6. Should the curb extensions be removed, Staff does not believe the Village is
compromising safety of the children. A safety patrol including both students and
teachers assist children across the street. This is probably the safest measure currently
being implemented by the school.
The Safety Commission discussed this issue at length at their June 11th meeting. I provided
a presentation on this issue and answered questions from the Safety Commission members.
Each person in the audience was given the opportunity to share his/her opinion on this issue.
In the end, the Safety Commission believed the curb extensions hadn't shown a significant
benefit to pedestrian safety. However, the Safety Commission did direct Village Staff to
continue in the effort of identifying other possible locations for traffic calming projects.
By a vote of 8-0, the Safety Commission recommends to remove the
temporary curb extensions along with the yellow striping and that no further
action related to traffic calming take place at this location at this time.
Please include this item on the July 17~ Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the
Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting as well as a location map for your reference.
Matthew P. Lawrie
cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe
x:~les\engineerYrafficXsafecomm~recs&min\juneO 1 ree.doc
Glen R. Andler ~ Roderick ~ O'Donovan
Sean R Dorsey Paul C~ Bures
Jeffrey A. Wulbecker Sandra M, Clark
M, Lisa Angell James E, Guenther
Mount Prospect Public Works Oepartment
1700 w. Oentrel F~oed, Mount Prospect, Illinoie 60056-2229
Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 TDD 847/392-1235
iVIINUTES OF TI-IE MOUNT PROSPECT
SAFETY COMMISSION
DRAFT
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:30 p.m.
on Monday, June 11, 2001.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Lee Beening Chairman
Chuck Bencic Commissioner
Joan Bjork Commissioner
· . John Keane Commissioner
Andy Mitchell Commissioner
Scott Sullivant Police Department
Buz Livingston Fire Department
Paul Bures Public Works
Matt Lawrie Public Works/Engineering Division
Absent: Nancy Bobikewicz Commissioner
Others in Attendance: See Attached Attendance Sheet.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Keane, moved to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of the Safety Commission held on March 12, 2001. The minutes were approved
by a vote of 8-0.
CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
No citizens came forth at this time to discuss any topics that were not on the current agenda·
]
Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink
OLD BUSINESS
A) FINAL CONSIDERATION OF PERMANENT CURB EXTENSIONS AROUND LIONS PARK
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
I) Background Information
The temporary curb extensions were installed by Public Works in December 2000 along Council
Trail. Village Staff sent surveys to the school and nearby residents to solicit their opinions in
February 2001. In addition, speed data was gathered and field observations were made around
the school. In March 2001, Village Staff presented their findings to the Safety Commission and
Village Board of Trustees.
It was decided at the time to leave the curb extensions in place until after the end of the school
year. More students would be walking to school in the spring months and, therefore, the Safety
commission requested a delay in a final decision. The additional time would allow Village Staff
to make more field observations and assist Staff in making a final recommendation.
A restudy of the area took place in May 2001 in anticipation of a June presentation to the Safety
Commission and Village Board of Trustees.
2) Conclusions of Study
a) The curb extensions appear to have enhanced pedestrian safety by reducing the crossing
distance and time it takes to cross the street. They have.also helped in reducing the potential
for vehicles to park near the intersection.
b) Motorists appear to have some difficulty maneuvering around the curb extension at School
Street. Any type of permanent curb extension should be easy to negotiate while influencing
motorists to proceed cautiously. The curb extensions should not detract motorists from being
aware of pedestrians.
c) The curb extensions do not appear to have made a significant positive impact on driver's
behavior. At School Street, the extension is 7' wide. At Elm Street, the extension is only 3'
wide. Council Trail, though a collector street, is only wide enough to handle three vehicles
side by side. On wider streets, the curb extensions would be larger and, therefore, motorists
would probably perceive the street to be much narrower thus greater affecting their behavior.
d) Both the previous survey and the latest survey show a majority of residents, parents and
motorists not in favor of permanent curb extensions. Most comments received indicated
either the temporary curb extensions had either no impact or made it a worse situation.
e) While not mentioned in this report, the cost of the permanent curb extensions was discussed
at length during the March Safety Commission Meeting. It is Staff's opinion that a
significant benefit ought to be observed during a study to justify the cost. The cost of
permanent curb extensions along Council Trail has been estimated around $20,000.
2
f) Should the curb extensions be removed, Staff does not believe the Village is compromising
safety of the children. A safety patrol including both students and teachers assist children
across the street.' This is probably the safest measure currently being implemented by the
school.
3) Recommendation
Based on the study of temporary curb extensions along Council Trail, the Village Traffic
Engineer believes curb extensions, in general, have shown to provide benefits to pedestrian
safety in the community. However, the overwhelming lack of support for permanent curb
extensions at this location has made me recomme~ad against installing them later this summer.
The Village Traffic Engineer recommends that the temporary curb extensions along with
the yellow striping be removed mid June once the school year has ended and no further
action related to traffic calming take place at this location at this time.
It is 'difficult to justify the cost of a permanent project when a significant enhancement to
pedestrian safety was not observed and when a majority of people does not support the project. I
don't believe we are compromising children's safety by not installing permanent curb extensions.
To deter motorists from parking near the intersections during drop-off and pick-up times, I would
recommend signing the area 20' from the crosswalks. Prohibition of parking within 20' of a
crosswalk is already an ordinance in the Village Code. I would also recommend having the
Police Department patrol the area to enforce the current parking restrictions.
From the study, I believe there are applicable locations in the Village for curb extensions. Some
Of the criteria that should be met before moving forward on a project are: local or collector
streets where there is above average traffic volume; wide streets where curb extensions would
impact driver's behavior; a location where there is a significant amount of pedestrians crossing
the street such as schools, churches, parks, downtown businesses, etc.; and, maybe most
importantly, a major/ty of affected people supporting the improvements. In addition, if safety is
not being compromised, a project should not move forward if a majority of affected people such
as residents, businesses, schools and motorists do not favor the changes.
While curb extensions are not recommended at this location, Village Staff will continue in our
effort to identify other possible locations for traffic calming projects. Once a possible project
has been identified, Staff will perform a formal traffic study and present the findings to the
Safety Commission for consideration of a construction project.
4) Discussion
Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided a brief history on this issue and presented the findings made by
Village Staff over the past few months. He also provided conclusions and recommendations
based on the traffic calming project.
Chairman Beening opened up the discussion to the public.
Mary Muscarello, 712 S. Hi-Lusi Avenue, expressed a concern with the traffic congestion along
Council Trail and the teacher parking lot during the afternoon pick-up time. She was under the
impression this issue was to be discussed at the meeting.
3
Traffic Engineer Lawrie explained that he was invited to a meeting a couple of weeks ago at the
school to discuss traffic congestion. At the meeting, he recommended to the school that the
teacher parking lot not be a location for pick-up. Ultimately, however, the decision was the
school's to make.
Karen Wabik, 114 S. Elmhurst Avenue, also expressed concerns with the traffic congestion
around the school. The Safety Commission discussed for some time with the two parents in
attendance some of the concerns. Chairman Beening explained to the parents what issues would
need to be reviewed by the Safety Commission and what issues would be the responsibility of the
school. After much discussion, the Safety Commission suggested to the parents that they work
with the school and possibly the school board in order to make those decisions that affect school
property. Traffic Engineer Lawrie told the parents that he mentioned to the school principal that
he would be willing to observe the traffic around the school once school resumes in September
and see if any further changes may be necessary.
On the topic of traffic calming, Commissioner Bencic asked if pennanent curb extensions were
not to be installed, would the Police Department prefer if the curbs were painted yellow or the
area signed to prevent parking near the intersections. Officer Sullivant responded that he would
prefer the area signed. Mr. Bures responded them is a maintenance issue with painting the curbs
and too would prefer the area signed.
Commissioner Bencic, seconded by Mr. Bures, moved to remove the temporary curb
ext. ensions along with the yellow striping and that no further action related to traffic
''calming take place at this location at this time. Commissioner Bencic further
recommended that to enforce a current ordinance, No Parking signs at those intersections
near the school be installed to prevent vehicles from parking near the crosswalks.
The motion was approved by a vote of 8-0.
OTHER COMMISSION ISSUES
Commissioner Keane brought up a sight obstruction concern at the intersection of Central Road
and Westgate Road. Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided Commissioner Keane a copy of a letter
sent to the homeowner requiring trimming of the trees. He was appreciative the Village would
take care of this issue.
Chairman Beening asked that when Council Trail is to be resurfaced the issue of possibly
widening the street in front of the school be discussed at the Safety Commission. With a wider
street, some of the current congestion may be alleviated. Traffic Engineer Lawrie m~mtioned that
this may, however, encourage double-parking during the drop-off and pick-up times. The school
is trying to prevent this by placing cones down the middle of the street. With the current width
of the street and use of the cones, double-parking is no longer occurring. Widening the street
may make it easier for parents to decide to double-park. The issue will be brought back to the
Safety Commission at the time Council Trail is to be resurface&
4
Chairman Beening brought up the issue of seat belt use by motorists in the Village. He
understood that other communities were passing laws that gave the right for police officers to
pull over and ticket motorists solely because they were not wearing seat belts. Commissioner
Beening would like to see the Village consider changing this violation from a "secondary"
offense to a "primary" offense. He asked that this issue be brought back to the Safety
Commission at the next regular meeting.
No additional issues were brought forth by the Safety Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 8-0 to adjourn at 8:40 p.m.
upon the motion of Commissioner Mitchell. Commissioner Keane seconded the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
x:kfiles\engineerXsa~ecom ~m~raffickrecs&min\june01 rain.doc
5
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois ..
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE BOARD AND FINANCE COMMISSION
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: MAY 25, 2001
SUBJECT: PROPOSED CIP: 2002-2006
Attached hereto is the proposed 2002-2006 Capital Improvements Program (CIP).
The projects being considered for the year 2002 total $21,748,107. The five-year total for all projects
is $55,109,091.
We encourage you to read the Manager's transmittal letter beginning on page ii. This correspondence
describes the purpose of the CIP, highlights some of the more significant projects, and reviews project
funding.
To help you evaluate our ability to fund the requested projects we updated the five-year financial
forecasts for the major operating and capital projects funds that provide funding for the CIP. We have
included these forecasts in the CIP document this year (see Section G).
In general,~both, the number and magnitude of the projects being presented directly relate to the monie~s
expected to be available. However, from reviewing the CIP requests in conjunction with the five-year
financial forecasts you will find three areas of potential concern.
General Fund Projects
The CIP is showing projects totaling an average of $313,000 as being paid from General Fund
revenues. This in itself appears reasonable given the fact we have funded in excess of $300,000 of
capital expenditures out of the General Fund for the past several years.
However, the five-year financial forecast for the General Fund is showing significant operating deficits
beginning in 2002 and continuing through 2006 (see page G-2). What this means is that we could find
it difficult to cover these projects 'and continue the annual operating transfer of $564;000 to the Capital
Improvements Fund.
As we get into the 2001 mid-year review and the actual budget process we should have a better handle
on our revenue picture. We do take a very conservative approach to estimating revenues for the
financial forecasts. It is very likely the operating deficits will be much smaller than those projected.
roposed CIP 2002-2006
May 25, 2001
Downtown Redevelopment F~nd ......
Based on the capital projects being recommended the Downtown Redevelopment Fund will see
negative fund balances in years 2002 through 2006 (see page G-10). The Fund should return to a
positive fund balance position in year 2007. The negative fund balance is projected to be at its peak in
the year 2003, when it is at a negative $1.2 million. If the Village wants to continue the redevelopment
efforts the General Fund would have to front the monies to the Redevelopment Fund until the year
2007. Of course, we could set it up so that the General Fund is repaid with interest.
The following table summarizes the financial status of the Downtown Redevelopment Fund if the
proposed CIP projects are included as expenditures:
Downtown Redevelopment Fund
'rojected Fund Balance
2002 ' 2003 2004 2005 2006
Beginning Balance $331,736 $(791~524) $(1,232,694) $(I~069,125) $(591,578)
Revenues 6,000 357,466 496,755 680,462 754,332
Expenditures (1,129,260) (798,636) (333,186) (202,915) (217,882)
Excess (Deficiency) (1,123,260) (441,170) 163,569 477,547 536,450
Ending Balance (791,524) (1,232,694) (1,069,125) (591,578) (55,128)
Water and Sewer Fund
The proposed CIP for 2002-2006 includes the start of a combined sewer system improvement program
at an approximate cost of $750,000 per year. This new program results in significant operating deficits
in the Water and Sewer Fund as can be seen in the five-year financial forecast (pages G-13 through G-
15). The deficits range from $793,000 to $1.1 million.
The draft CIP is showing five projects valued at $17.1 million as being funded through the issuance of '
general obligation bonds. Two of these projects are the construction of a new Village Hall/Community
Center and a multi-level parking structure, which account for $12.6 million of the total amount.
Staff looks forward to discussing the draft CIP with you in the very near future.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
\\DP01W01\USERS\DELLSWOR\CIP\02-06\Correspondence~Memo to Bd.doc
Copy: Michael Janoni$, Village Manager
Dave Strahl, Assistant Village Manager
Departmem Directors
33MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
T/rao~y J. Cor¢oran
Village of Mount Prospect Ve,maW. we
Richard M. Lohrstorfer
Michaele W. Skowron Community Development Department ~ho~: g47/392-6000
Irw-qa K. Wi[ks Fax: 847/392-6022
Michael A. Zadel 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD: 847/392-6064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
2nd Floor Conference Room Wednesday
Village Hall July 18, 2001
100 South Emerson Street 7:00 p.m.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. June20, 2001
IV. OLD BUSINESS
None
V. SUBDIVISIONS
A. PC-02-01/Maughn Subdivision (801 Cathy Lane)
Creates one-lot of record
B. PC-12-01/Craig Plat of Consolidation (301&303 Douglas)
Creates one lot of record
C. PC-13-01/Craig 2~d Plat of Consolidation (305&307 Douglas)
Creates one lot of record
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of Community Development BloCk Grant (CDBG) FY2002
Preliminary Funding Recommendations
VII. COMMENTS/OTHER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some
accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at
100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
June 20, 2001
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Vice-Chairman Matt
Sledz at 7:11 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Matt Sledz, Vice-Chairman
Gary Grouwinkel
Carol Tortorello
Edwin Janus
Bill Reddy
Village Staff Present: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner
Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner
Others in Attendance: Lenoard Tomasewski, resident
Dean Geroulis, Tribnne
CDBG Applicants, see attached sign in sheet
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Vice-Chairman Sledz asked for comments or changes to the minutes.
There were no changes to the minutes. Carol Tortorello moved to approve the minutes from the June 20,
2001 Plan Commission meeting and Matt Sledz seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a
voice vote of 3-0 with Bill Reddy and Edwin Janus abstaining. Vice-Chairman Sledz asked staff to
present the next item on the agenda case, PC-04-01.
SUBDIVISION:
PC-04-01 Tomasewski Subdivsion 110 South Audrey Lane
Petitioner: Leonard Tomasewski
Staff: Suzanne Mas6 Long Range Planner
In this case, the petitioner is seeking to create one lot of record by consolidating his existing lot with a
portion of vacated Meier Road directly behind the lot. The village vacated Meier Road in 1994 as part of
a subdivision redevelopment. The plat merely updates public records. Staff recommended approval.
There were some questions as to what type of fencing and landscaping could be built on the vacated
portion of the consolidated lot. The plat was approved 5-0.
NEW BUSINESS:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2002 Application Vice-Chairman Sledz asked Ms.
Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner, to address the next item of business. Ms. Roberts welcomed the
applicants of the Village's CDBG 2002 program. She informed them that the purpose of the meeting is to
hear presentations from each agency, and allow the Plan Commission to ask questions about their
program. She also informed them that no formal funding recommendations would be made at this
meeting, but there will be a Public Hearing at the July 18, 2001 Plan Commission meeting where the Plan
Commission will make funding recommendations for each applicant. Ms. Roberts also noted that there
were two new applicants this year - Mount Prospect School District 57 and the Workforce Board of
Northern Cook County. She reminded applicants that all proposals should address the objectives of
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 2
June 6, 2001
benefiting low and moderate-income residents or the elimination of slum/blight conditions in Mount
Prospect. Ms. Roberts also informed applicants that, based on HUD's estimated funding allocation for FY
2002, the Village of Mount Prospect should receive $368,000.00, the same as the FY2001 allocation. She
said that there is a 15% cap on Public Service programs, and a 20% cap on Administration of the program
year's funding allocation.
Ms. Roberts told applicants that they would present their proposals on a first-come-first served basis as
noted in the sign-in sheet. Each agency was given five minutes to present their proposals, and there was
opportunity for the Commission to ask questions after each presentation. In the order listed below, agency
representatives spoke about the purpose of their program, the benefits to low-income residents of Mount
Prospect, program output and outcome, and their anticipated funding needs. The Plan Commission asked
the representatives questions related to the above-mentioned topics, which were answered satisfactorily.
The following list also reflects the agencies that submitted proposals but were not present at the meeting.
Katie Bernico Suburban Health Care Youth & Adults $I0,000
April Foley & Nancy Village of Mount Prospect Youth $18,000
Cony
Melissa Sly Mount Prospect School Disttict57 Youth $1,500
Freida Walker & Michael Workforce Board Adult $15,000
Spiers
Linnea Pioro Camp Fire Boys & Girls Youth $15,000
Mark Parr Children's Advocacy Ctr. Youth $3,000
Cynthia Ash Girl Scouts-IL Crossroads Council Youth $10,000
Barb Eanos Clayground, Inc. Youth $15,000
Geoff Gephart HOPE NOW Homelessness $15,000
Sharon Anderson Club RecPlex Youth $3,000
TOTAL $125,665
OLD BUSINESS: None
COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS:
There ~vas discussion on how to allocate funds among the applicants. The Plan Commission recognized
the youth programs such as Clayground Inc., as being invaluable to the Mount Prospect Community.
Vice-Chairman Sledz stated that funding youth programs should be the primary focus of the Commission.
However, members also said that other programs such as Access to Care and the HOPE NOW are also
invaluable to the low-income residems of Mount Prospect. Plan Commission members also voiced
concerns about the Girl Scouts program due to termination of a similar program in the Boxwood area
several years ago. 'i-here was also discussion about the two new programs. Gary Grouwinkel stated that
School District 57, "Character Counts" Program would benefit the community because of its level of
involvement with other agencies within the community (i.e., Police Department). However, Carol
Tortorello was concerned about the amount of students in District 57 who are qualified as low income.
The Plan Commissioners also voiced concerns about the scholarship program that the Workfome Board
proposed, noting that there were no specific selection criteria for recruiting low-income residents to the
program, or specific schools in which they would attend.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 3
June 6, 2001
Vice-Chairman Sledz closed the public session at 9:26 p.m., and moved to adjourn and Bill Reddy
seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner
Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner
GEN~Plng]PC~200 lk6-20-0 I\PC-04-0 I\CDBG APPLICATION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSECT
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
JOINT REVIEW BOARD
ORDER OF BUSINESS
SPECIAL MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Village Hall Thursday, July 19, 2001
100 South Emerson Street 3:30 P.M.
Second Floor Conference Room
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Selection of Chairperson
IV. Update on the Downtown Redevelopment Project
V. Discussion Regarding the 2000 Annual TIF Report
VI. Discussion Regarding the Current TIF Financial Pro-Forma
VII. Other Business
VIII. Adjournment
Any individual with a disability who would like to attend this meeting should contact the
Village's Director of Finance at 100 South Emerson St., (847) 392-6000, TDD (847) 392-6064.
15TIF~.dminXJRB~2001 ~Agenda.doc
MEETING NOTICE
DATE: July 17, Tuesday
LOCATION: Police & Fire Headquarters
112 E. Northwest Highway
Police Administrative Conference Room, 2nd Floor
TIME: 5:30 p.m.
AGENDA
I. Approval of Minutes
615101 - Open Meeting
II. Introduction of new Police Chief
Ill. Review of Police New Hire & Promotional Testing Processes
MOUNT PROSPECT BOARD OF
FIRE & POLICE COMMISSIONERS
C,
cHRISTOPHER ~, [hairman
Date July 13, 2001
VILLAGE CLERK NOTIFIED BY: Christopher J. Lenz
~ Date July 13, 2001
POSTED BY:
"/
Date
AN'G INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF
A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE SHOULD CONTACT
THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AT 112 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY, MOUNT PROSPECT,
847 870-5656. TDD 708 392-1269