HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/29/1964 VB minutes MINUTES OF SPECIAn MEETING OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES
HELD JUNE 29, 196~
Clerk Ruth Wilson called the special meeting to order
at 8:10 P.M., which meeting was duly called and notice duly
given to all T~ustees~ the following members were present:
roll call
Bergen Busse Casterline
Ekren Phillips
T~ustee Bruhl a~ived at 8:14
Absent: President Schlaver
T~ustee Casterline~ seconded by Trustee Ekren, moved
for Tmustee Phillips %0 act as P~esident P~o Tem for the meeting.
This motion ca~ied by acclamation.
The first item brought befoz'e this special meeting Rand Auto Wash
was the Rand Road Auto Wash. Mr. Appleby reported that the plan (Continental 0il
with the new acceleration lane is acceptable to the State and the Co. - see
petitioners were ready to go ahead with the car wash as on this Zoning Case
plan, which would eliminate the north driveway and move the two 62-33)
northerly d~iveways farther south. Mr. Pecora, Mr. Gill and
McPartlin~ a Vice President of the Mortgage Dept. of the Commer-
cial National Bank, Chicago, were at the meeting representing
the cam wash. M~. Pecora stated that they had bought the extra
property on the west for ext~ra pa~ki~ of cars and had no intent
to use it for anything else at this time. Mr. Hofert explained
~hat this piece of property, whether annexed to the Village or
left in the County, would have to have a Special. Use permit for
the car wash. Mr. Pecora stated that if the State's plan were
used they would not use the no~herly part of it abutting Rand
Road for anything else at this time.
Mn. McPartlin stated that the petitioners had a Con-
tract to purchase all of the property on Rand Road and, before
he would agree to a covenant running with .the land that the bal-
ance of the land would be used only for a ca~-wash and g~Dline
facilities, he would have to talk to the principals involved.
Mr. Pecora was asked to present a ~evised set of plans which would
incorporate the exterior layout of the plans approved by the State
and the interior layout of the plans originally presented to the
Village and a covenant that the land would not be used for other
than a car wash.
The second item brought before themeeting .was Special S.A. #63
Assessment No. 63, Kenilworth Avenue et al. M~. Hofert explained Kenilworth Ave
that the total cost of the improvemen~ on Kenilwo~h and Prospec~ pavin~
Avenues including relocation of sidewalks, pavements and drive-
ways along Kenilworth south of Thayer would cost $~8,000.of which
there was $13,000 in public benefit and assessment for the proper-
ty on-~enilworth south of Thayer in the amountof $16,000, an
assessme~t~of $18,000 for'the p~opemty'nor~h.of Thayer~ and that
the $13,000 in public benefit had been spread in suc~ a manner as
to benefit Kenilworth south of Thayer with little regard for any
public benefit to any improvemenT.~orth of Thayer. Mr. Hofert
explained this byreferTing-to a map which showed the various lots
in the improvement andthe assessment for each lo~. Me
that legal objections have ~been filed by Messrs. t~miger and Di
Mucci objecting to the assessment north of Thayer on the grounds:
June 29, 196~
1. That their property was not benefited to
the extent of the assessment against the
various lots.
2. That the public,benefits were unevenly
distributed.
, Mr. Hofe~t stated that appraiser, Raymond Wright, had
indicated to him that he could not testify in favor of the roll
as to the assessment north of Thayer, and felt the amount as-
sassed against the impDDvement north of Thayer was in error by
at least $6,000 and the assessment north of Thayer would have to
be reduced by $6,000 before he would 'testify in favor of the
roll. Mr. Hofert stated the Village had the following alterna-
tives:
Accord an additional $6,000 in public benefit
to the property north of Thayer and obtain the
agreement of the objec.tors to proceed with the
special assessment on this revised basis.
Encourage the Park Distr~ct tO condemn the
property north of Thayer and~vacate the
streets after it had acquired same.
In this regard Mr.. Payr~e, P~esident of the Park Boar~,
stated that although he had not talked to his board, a pa~k could
be used in this area ~nd this property ~together with the vacated
streets would constitute a desirable park and he ,was willing to
bring this issue before the Park Board. Mr. Mofert said another
alternative was to abandon, the present special assessment and
start a new special assessmant 66r Kenilworth south of Thayer and,
if the Village wished, start another special assessment for this
area north of Thayer, thus having two separate special assessments
which could be handled much more speciously.
Mr. Wright verified t~he statements which had been made
by Mr. Mofert relative to what his testimony wQ~ld be ~nd his
refusal to testify unless additional public benefits were accorded
the area north of Thayer. He indicated that the reason the cost
of the improvement north of Thayer did not equal the amount shown
on the. roll was the fact there were too many streets for the land
involved. He recommended improving Kenilwo~h south of Thayer and
letting the property owners improve their own property at a future
date.
There was general discussion had as to whether or. not
the public benefit accorded Kenilworth south of Thayer was too
great and should be reduced.
T~ustee Busse, seconded by T~ustee .Ekren~ moved tocon-
tinue the special assessment spreading the assessment along Kenil-
worth between Central and Thayer with public benefits not toex-
ceed 20% and to ignore the proper~y north of Thayer and leave
this for future development, at which time the developer would be
asked to improve the streets. After discussion this motion was
withdrawn, --~
Trustee Casterline, seconded by T~ustee Bruhl, moved to
authorize the Village Attorney to proceed with the Special As,
sessment with an addition of $6~000 additional public benefitl t°
be used on the property north of Thayer.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Bergen Bruhl Casterline
Nays: Busse Ekren Phillips
Motion failed.
June 29~ 196~
S. A. $63
Kenilworth Ave
Trustee Casterline, seconded by Trustee Phillips, moved
to proceed with the assessment from Central to Thayer and authorize
the Village Attorney to revise the assessment accordingly so that
the property owners would be assessed approximately the same, elim-
inating the Di Mucei and Irmiger area north of Thayer. Before roll
call was completed the motion was withdrawn.
Trustee Ekren, seconded by Trustee Bruhl, moved to author-
ize the Village Attorney to ask for a continuance of the case.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse Bruhl Ekren Phillips
Nays: Bergen Casterline
Motion carried.
Adjournment hy acclamation at 11:05 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth C. Wilson, Clerk
June 29, 1964