HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. NEW BUSINESS 07/20/2010 Village of Mount Prospect M°"`$`
Community Development Department
M P
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER kr,,
12. so
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 13, 2010
SUBJECT: PLAT OF DEDICATION — HUNTINGTON COMMONS DEDICAT
THE CHURCH OF NAZARENE (1501 LINNEMAN ROAD)
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT — APPLICANT
The petitioner, the Village of Mount Prospect, is seeking approval of a Plat of Dedication for public right -of -way
for the property at 1501 Linneman Road. The Plat of Dedication was a requirement in order to install the public
sidewalk along the Huntington Commons street frontage of the property at 1501 Linneman Road.
Attached is a copy of the Plat of Dedication for Public Street in the Village of Mount Prospect. The Plat of
Dedication dedicates the northerly eleven feet (11') of the subject property and includes the appropriate signature
blocks. Staff has reviewed the plat and found it to be prepared according to all Village codes and requirements.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
July 20, 2010 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
-
H0PLAHIPIanning & Zoning COMMIP &Z 2010\MEJ Mcmos\PZ -I0 -10 1501 Linneman Rd (Plat of Dedication).doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLAT OF DEDICATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
1501 LINNEMAN ROAD, CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect (Petitioner) has requested approval of a Plat of
Dedication for public right -of -way of the northerly eleven feet (11') of the property located at 1501
Linneman Road, Church of the Nazarene; and
WHEREAS, the Plat of Dedication was required to install the public sidewalk along the Huntington
Commons street frontage of the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village, after due consideration, have determined that it
is in the best interest of the Village and its residents to dedicate such property and to approve and
appropriately record the attached Plat of Dedication.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The dedication of the right -of -way is hereby granted for the northerly eleven feet
(11') of the property located at 1501 Linneman Road and the Plat of Dedication attached to this
Resolution as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording. Such Plat
and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Clerk of the Village be and are hereby authorized and
directed to sign said Plat of Dedication on behalf of the Village.
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to take the necessary steps to
record a certified copy of this Resolution and the attached plat with the Cook County Recorder of
Deeds.
SECTION FOUR: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this 20 day of July, 2010.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
0
P
0
o
0
4 Z > o x 44 m 0 g7 4m W
C 2o � O C y l9"H�O K t'.
Gov °„ m ° "rL • D y
mm n r o 2z _ e
K
° °°° F 1 o �ro � o
C < ` -- n ' < r . to WeOt line of the tinuthw Qoarler of the So uthe0st Q usrt r of S 14 -i1 - 11
>> y n O S O y ::: 1600
W m40 rr y nC I a
m m m r
n° m ny �s 5 o
m r2
O co r let a 1
a O_
z7 tic > i
I { P , 1 sco mm< 1 >
mm m3m m 11 -+
m C m T
> r > P r
> y tin-!> 0 . 7c [ , - t >
' C1 o o c o p ..1 A O 1 a t'
T Z 1 OH x C> ZmO F . Z E A� SQO n n
y m r-30 .Z. '..: -5's
-4 ° nm KO m 1 Do .w.' :
ZO nr 0-1 0 i w $ a _ ;51
> �« to ; e ^ ^ lit 8!°! /� "1
-Im n -. rip N - !'a r
T.
!! r - 9 s. CD
r./ m .1 a' Em p aSo�n w
7C a i O In ;n -3 m " o` x : a 01 Iv H
m MZ A K w C. 2 , ov S
D
_ y w O _
ig D w D• g w w w
n V = ``. O C y CD 22 0
5 t, OG >f<OP 2g7,2118 ny ,i, y O •D � �e > w 0
n .� ~� r g �00 = . z > tin OFi Fhi E~ C K mom On v a i S e a. "11
7
7 T A C � Cp '�. $ m C O y l�n y "Z7 v, O m, ` G to DS.D. �. C i 9rSS1
Z•: l O b-7' l�jy 4 N n s ... > oan a x 5� n2,g4�
: E
t1 z N , O O y A r r i e yy y ... ^tti �n m y Z n as =.z,
3 my rdo = M - O 'n V1n $ �� � �5e q•!y
p etn�y g�8g 'l z. p -.A> : ° y ?0!".., CI rti
` �y F+ ,y,, , mpg '4 Y p� ' � y V•i 'A = A
0 .1 D 0 ..M
tE+ �y � Pf y aKC °? S 3
f "� p ;. r n;-i n -
Tic' i D gz -
+� T-t 21 gy ,- 2 00 E
2 1 p 8 , rD ,i K e
G
, "'r 1, • pt4L 4R gam 1 � N a i � s �
y 0 - i,17y 1 yC - Ig m�y O� ,Di O w
z.°.wD
t„' [ rt O w D
y IR !ym0lC 6[ m to og m m' :,,—m N
C O n C m yy <: 0
nti 00 ° 4noc z �n ...=
G
O U C
r Z
N r 4 C b C A •- S c •o y %- n =7.. o n I
[ i iJ m mO <<7�7�cnb << C� <
m -1 y y
,n Ztgtn,�-Im M= ri y
A O • , thz O
O
Ty -
v+iPiJ o Zm>m03 O _ _
-� m r r
�, m
] H M Te
w 9 N �O� �.. z > N ~ "3A n y
o 0 w n A ze y ' gi
c t n u t> 9Y.. I
n - C 0 eO c y *i
rn to M m RE Ag — W
n o
G. gMtnC
. 8
7 \ 4 ) O
Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
M P
MEMORANDUM
e2'''57?:47 e 11/44713
TO MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER 1 20 10
FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 15, 2010
SUBJECT: REPEAL OF ORDINANCE # 5640
Attached to this memorandum is an ordinance that would repeal ordinance # 5640 that authorized the
acquisition of the property located at 6 -18 W. Busse Avenue through condemnation. Ordinance # 5640
was originally approved by the Village Board on July 24, 2007. The Village Board has decided that it is
not in the best interest of the Village to pursue the acquisition of this property and therefore on advice of
Village Counsel should adopt the attached ordinance.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their July 20 meeting. Staff will be at that meeting to answer any questions related to
this matter.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 5640,
IN REGARD TO THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION
OR OTHERWISE IN THE TAX INCREMENT REDEVELPMENT PROJECT AREA
6 -18 WEST BUSSE AVENUE, MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, on July 24, 2007, the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois, passed and adopted Ordinance No. 5640, An Ordinance Authorizing The
Acquisition Of Property Through Condemnation Or Otherwise In The Tax Increment
Redevelopment Project Area ( "Ordinance No. 5640 "), a copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5640 authorizes the acquisition of certain real
property, commonly known as 6 -18 West Busse Avenue, Mount Prospect, Illinois,
Permanent Index No. 08 -12- 102 - 062 -0000 (the "Property "); and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that
development opportunities in the underlying Tax Increment Redevelopment Project
Area have disappeared due to the current economy and that it is no longer in the best
interests of the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect to acquire the Property.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, acting in the exercise of their
home rule powers, as follows:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are hereby incorporated into this Ordinance
as fully as if restated herein in their entirety.
SECTION 2: That Ordinance No. 5640, An Ordinance Authorizing The
Acquisition Of Property Through Condemnation Or Otherwise In The Tax Increment
254631_1 1
Redevelopment Project Area, which was passed and adopted on July 24, 2007, is
hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION 3: That the Village of Mount Prospect shall hereby cease any further
efforts to acquire the Property.
SECTION 4: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 2010
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H: \CLKO \WIN \ORDINANCE2 \MP Ord Repeal Ord 5640 for condemantionyotijuly202010.DOC
254631_1 2
ORDINANCE NO. 5640
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY
THROUGH THE CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE IN
THE TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
Passed and approved
by the President and Board of Trustees
the 24 day of July, 2007
Published in pamphlet form
by authority of the corporate authorities
of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois,
the 25 day of July, 2007.
ORDINANCE NO. 5640
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF
PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE IN
THE TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois has heretofore
adopted Ordinance Number 3554 adopting the District No. 1 Tax Increment
Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, and Ordinance Number 3555 entitled
"An Ordinance Designating District No. 1 Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area in
the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois ", and Ordinance Number 3556 entitled "An
Ordinance Adopting Tax Increment Financing for the District No. 1 Tax Increment
Redevelopment Project in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois all of which are
incorporated herein in their entirety.
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has determined that the above - mentioned
Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project which were the subject
matter of the public hearings is in the best interests of the residents of the Village of
Mount Prospect and is a public purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is empowered, pursuant to the Real Property
Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, P /S/ 79 -1525, appearing as Section 11-
74.4-1 et. seq., of Chapter 65, Illinois Compiled Statutes 2003, (hereinafter the "Act ") to
acquire by purchase, donation, lease or eminent domain real property within the
redevelopment project area; and
WHEREAS, the implementation of the aforementioned Tax Increment Redevelopment
Plan and Project would attract to the Village of Mount Prospect additional commercial
ventures, increase business for commercial ventures currently established within the
Village, strengthen the property and non - property tax and income bases, and would
provide jobs for the Village residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COUNTY OF
COOK, STATE OF ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME
RULE POWERS, as follows:
SECTION 1: That it is hereby determined that the Tax Increment
Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project previously adopted be established,
maintained, controlled, managed and operated within the corporate limits of the Village
of Mount Prospect within the District Number 1 Tax Increment Redevelopment Project
Area as described in Ordinance Nos. 3554, 3555 and 3556 and that said Tax Increment
Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project be occupied, improved, used and
developed in a manner necessary and convenient for public use.
SECTION 2: That under the authority vested in the corporate authorities of the
Village of Mount Prospect, through the statutes of the State of Illinois and the home rule
power and ordinances of the Village, it is hereby determined that pursuant to the Tax
Increment Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project it is necessary and desirable
that the Village shall acquire title to and possession of certain real property commonly
known as 6 -18 West Busse Avenue, Mount Prospect, Illinois, Permanent Index 08 -12-
102- 062 -0000, and legally described in the Exhibit which is attached hereto and made a
part hereof and hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property ", which property is
within the foregoing Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area and is necessary,
required and needed to achieve the objectives of the foregoing Tax Increment
Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, and which property lies wholly within
the limits of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION 3: That the Village Attorney or such other persons as he may
designate are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate personally or
through its representatives for and on behalf of said Village with the owner or owners of
the Subject Property for the purchase and acquisition thereof by said Village.
SECTION 4: That in the event the said Village Attorney or his designee are
unable to agree with the owner or owners of said real property as to the compensation
thereof, then title to and possession of the Subject Property shall be acquired by the
Village of Mount Prospect through condemnation, and authorization is hereby given to
institute proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction to acquire title to and
possession of the Subject Property for the Village in accordance with the Act, the
eminent domain laws of the State of Illinois and the ordinances of the Village of Mount
Prospect.
SECTION 5: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
Passed by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois and
approved by the President thereof this 24th day of July, 2007 .
Ayes: Corcoran, Juracek, Korn, Lohrstorfer, Zadel
Nays: None
Absent: Hoefert //,
C: Documents and Settings kdewis Local Settings Temporary Internet Files'OLKGB condemnationordinancel8 W Busseiune.doc
Exhibit "A"
Legal Description for parcel 08 -12 -102- 062 -0000
That part of Lot 4 in Mount Prospect Central District Subdivision of part of the
west half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal
Meridian according to the plat thereof recorded December 23, 1949 as document
1275902, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the southernmost line of Lot 2 in
said Mount Prospect Central District Subdivision, all in Cook County Illinois.
Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
o
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER
" PI
DATE: JULY 15, 2010
SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY
FINAL REPORT FOR ZONES 3, 4 & 10
The Engineering Division in collaboration with KLOA Inc., the Village's traffic engineering consultant,
have recently completed post- studies at the one year mark after implementing the approved intersection
control and speed limit plans in three neighborhoods. These neighborhoods, Zones 3, 4 & 10, represent
completion of the Neighborhood Traffic Study for a total of fourteen of the eighteen zones as part of this
Village -wide program. This report highlights the post - studies for these three neighborhoods and provides
final intersection control and speed limit recommendations.
Zone 3
Zone 3 is bounded by Camp McDonald Road to the north, Elmhurst Road to the east, Kensington Road to
the south, and the western Village limits. The neighborhood has 18 intersections and approximately 3.3
miles of streets under the Village's jurisdiction. Old Orchard Country Club is within the neighborhood.
The first post -study was performed approximately six months after implementing the sign changes. Each
property in the neighborhood was mailed a letter highlighting the results of the study. A web page on the
Village web site was also created with additional information. The second post - study, performed one
year after implementing the sign changes, focused on those locations that were deemed to require
additional evaluation based on the results of the first post - study. Therefore, the second post -study
involved gathering vehicular volume and speed data at only 8 locations compared to 20 locations from the
first post - study. However, similar to the first post - study, the Village also reviewed accident records at all
18 intersections in the neighborhood. Below is a summary of the results:
First Post -Study
Daily Volume (comparing data before sign changes to data from first post - study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 18 locations (90 %)
Increased by 10% or more at 2 locations (10 %)
Average Speed (comparing data before sign changes to data from first post - study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 20 locations (100 %)
Increased by 5 mph or more at 0 locations (0 %)
Accident Rate (# accidents in the neighborhood) -
3-year period before the sign changes: 2
6 -month period after the sign changes: 0
page 1 of 5
Neighborhood Traffic Study — Zones 3, 4 & 10
July 15, 2010 _
Second Post -Study
Daily Volume (comparing data before sign changes to data from second post- study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 7 locations (88 %)
Increased by 10% or more at 1 location (12 %)
Average Speed (comparing data before sign changes to data from second post - study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 8 locations (100 %)
Increased by 5 mph or more at 0 locations (0 %)
Accident Rate (# accidents in the neighborhood) -
3-year period before the sign changes: 2
1 -year period after the sign changes: 0 100% reduction
Evaluation
The results of the post- studies indicate that the operating characteristics within the neighborhood have
generally improved since implementation of the intersection traffic control and speed limit modifications.
It appears the sign changes have improved the flow of traffic within the neighborhood and enhanced
safety. Overall, traffic volumes and speeds are within acceptable ranges and the accident rate has
decreased. While some streets have experienced an increase in traffic volume and/or speed, the number
of such locations has been very limited.
The one location from the second post -study that has experienced a 10% or more increase in traffic
volume is a local street where the average daily traffic increased from 155 to 192 vehicles, still within the
range of a local street. With respect to traffic speed, no locations experienced an average speed increase
of 5 mph during the second post - study.
One street within the Prospect Meadows Subdivsion that has been given extra scrutiny during the post -
study review is Forest Avenue. This five block long, north -south local street had an average daily traffic
volume of 337 vehicles and an average vehicle speed of 26 mph during the original study. Five east -west
streets terminate at Forest Avenue and none of the T- intersections had traffic control prior to the study.
The five terminating streets now have Stop signs to define the right -of -way with Forest Avenue
continuing to have no traffic control. Before implementation, residents expressed concern that both daily
volume and average speed would increase with the proposed intersection control. The second post -study
results show an average daily traffic volume of 266 vehicles and an average vehicle speed of 24 mph,
both lower than the original study. Based on the data, Staff continues to support the current intersection
traffic control along Forest Avenue.
Recommendation
Based on the two post- studies performed by the Engineering Division and KLOA Inc., there are no
recommended adjustments to the intersection control or speed limits in the neighborhood.
Zone 4
Zone 4 is bounded by Euclid Avenue to the north, Wolf Road to the east, Kensington Road to the south,
and Elmhurst Road to the west. The neighborhood has 58 intersections and approximately 9.7 miles of
streets under the Village's jurisdiction. Euclid Elementary School, River Trails Middle School and
Randhurst Mall are within the neighborhood.
The first post -study was performed approximately six months after implementing the sign changes. Each
property in the neighborhood was mailed a letter highlighting the results of the study. A web page on the
Village web site was also created with additional information. The second post- study, performed one
year after implementing the sign changes, focused on those locations that were deemed to require
additional evaluation based on the results of the first post- study. Therefore, the second post -study
involved gathering vehicular volume and speed data at only 12 locations compared to 44 locations from
Neighborhood Traffic Study — Zones 3, 4 & 10
July 15, 2010
the first post - study. However, similar to the first post- study, the Village also monitored pedestrian
activity at 3 intersections and reviewed accident records at all 58 intersections in the neighborhood.
Below is a summary of the results:
First Post -Study
Daily Volume (comparing data before sign changes to data from first post- study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 44 locations (100 %)
Increased by 10% or more at 0 locations (0 %)
Average Speed (comparing data before sign changes to data from first post- study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 43 locations (98 %)
Increased by 5 mph or more at 1 location (2 %)
Accident Rate (# accidents in the neighborhood) -
3-year period before the sign changes: 16
6 -month period after the sign changes: 1
Second Post -Study
Daily Volume (comparing data before sign changes to data from second post - study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 9 locations (75 %)
Increased by 10% or more at 3 locations (25 %)
Average Speed (comparing data before sign changes to data from second post- study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 11 locations (92 %)
Increased by 5 mph or more at 1 location (8 %)
Accident Rate (# accidents in the neighborhood) -
3-year period before the sign changes: 16
1 -year period after the sign changes: 3 44% reduction
Evaluation
The results of the post- studies indicate that the operating characteristics within the neighborhood have
generally improved since implementation of the intersection traffic control and speed limit modifications.
It appears the sign changes have improved the flow of traffic within the neighborhood and enhanced
safety. Overall, traffic volumes and speeds are within acceptable ranges and the accident rate has
decreased. While some streets have experienced an increase in traffic volume and /or speed, the number
of such locations has been very limited.
The three locations from the second post -study that have experienced a 10% or more increase in traffic
volume are all local streets where the average daily traffic increased between one and five vehicles per
hour. On these streets, the average daily traffic remains within the typical range for local streets. With
respect to traffic speed, the one location that experienced an average speed increase of 5 mph during the
second post -study is still at a level below the posted speed limit.
One intersection that has been given extra scrutiny during the post -study review is Barberry Lane and
Juniper Lane. This T- intersection was originally controlled with Stop signs in all three directions. With
low average daily traffic volumes (313 vehicles on Barberry Lane and 155 vehicles on Juniper Lane) and
good sight lines, KLOA Inc. and the Engineering Division recommended that the Stop signs on the thru
street (Barberry Lane) be removed. The results of the second post -study show lower average daily traffic
volumes on both streets (248 vehicles on Barberry Lane and 142 vehicles on Juniper Lane). In addition,
the average vehicle speed along Barberry Lane did not increase. Based on the data, Staff continues to
support the current intersection traffic control at Barberry Lane and Juniper Lane.
na¢e 3 of 5
Neighborhood Traffic Study — Zones 3, 4 & 10
July 15, 2010
Recommendation
Based on the two post- studies performed by the Engineering Division and KLOA Inc., there are no
recommended adjustments to the intersection control or speed limits in the neighborhood.
Zone 10
Zone 10 is bounded by the southern boundary of the Kensington Business Park to the north, Wolf Road to
the east, Central Road to the south, and Rand Road to the west. The neighborhood has 35 intersections
and approximately 6.6 miles of streets under the Village's jurisdiction. St. Emily Church & School,
Bluett Park and Mount Prospect Plaza are within the neighborhood.
The first post -study was performed approximately six months after implementing the sign changes. Each
property in the neighborhood was mailed a letter highlighting the results of the study. A web page on the
Village web site was also created with additional information. The second post- study, performed one
year after implementing the sign changes, focused on those locations that were deemed to require
additional evaluation based on the results of the first post - study. Therefore, the second post -study
involved gathering vehicular volume and speed data at only 14 locations compared to 31 locations from
the first post - study. However, similar to the first post - study, the Village also monitored pedestrian
activity at 4 intersections and reviewed accident records at all 35 intersections in the neighborhood.
Below is a summary of the results:
First Post -Study
Daily Volume (comparing data before sign changes to data from first post- study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 29 locations (94 %)
Increased by 10% or more at 2 locations (6 %)
Average Speed (comparing data before sign changes to data from first post- study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 28 locations (90 %)
Increased by 5 mph or more at 3 locations (10 %)
Accident Rate (# accidents in the neighborhood) -
3-year period before the sign changes: 6
6 -month period after the sign changes: 1
Second Post -Study
Daily Volume (comparing data before sign changes to data from second post- study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 9 locations (64 %)
Increased by 10% or more at 5 locations (36 %)
Average Speed (comparing data before sign changes to data from second post- study) -
Stayed consistent or decreased at 11 locations (79 %)
Increased by 5 mph or more at 3 locations (21 %)
Accident Rate (# accidents in the neighborhood) -
3-year period before the sign changes: 6
1 -year period after the sign changes: 2 0% reduction
Evaluation
The results of the post- studies indicate that the operating characteristics within the neighborhood have
generally improved since implementation of the intersection traffic control and speed limit modifications.
Overall, traffic volumes and speeds are within acceptable ranges and the accident rate for the
neighborhood remains low. While some streets have experienced an increase in traffic volume and /or
speed, the number of such locations has been very limited.
Neighborhood Traffic Study — Zones 3, 4 & 10
July 15, 2010
The five locations from the second post -study that have experienced a 10% or more increase in traffic
volume are all local streets where the average daily traffic increased between one and five vehicles per
hour. On these streets, the average daily traffic remains within the typical range for local streets. With
respect to traffic speed, two of the three locations that experienced an average speed increase of 5 mph
during the second post -study are still at levels below the posted speed limit. The other location
experienced an average vehicle speed of 27 mph.
One intersection that has been given extra scrutiny during the post -study review is Lowden Lane and
Stevenson Lane. This T- intersection was originally controlled with Stop signs in all three directions.
With low average daily traffic volumes (470 vehicles on Lowden Lane and 250 vehicles on Stevenson
Lane) and good sight lines, KLOA Inc. and the Engineering Division recommended that the Stop signs on
the thru street (Lowden Lane) be removed. The results of the second post -study show lower average daily
traffic volumes on both streets (427 vehicles on Lowden Lane and 212 vehicles on Stevenson Lane). The
average vehicle speed along Lowden Lane slightly increased. During a two week period, the Police
Department dedicated over seven hours to speed limit enforcement along Lowden Lane. No citations
were issued. Based on the data and the efforts of the Police Department, Staff continues to support the
current intersection traffic control at Lowden Lane and Stevenson Lane.
Recommendation
Based on the two post- studies performed by the Engineering Division and KLOA Inc., there are no
recommended adjustments to the intersection control or speed limits in the neighborhood.
Resident Notification
As part of the mailing of the first post -study results, residents were made aware that there would be a
mailing of the second post -study results only in the event further sign changes are recommended by the
Engineering Division. Otherwise, they could contact the Engineering Division or check the Village web
site for results of the second post- study. The Village web site currently provides a summary of the latest
post -study and provides notice of the July 20 Village Board Meeting. Residents have been invited to
attend and participate in the meeting via the Village web site. Decisions made by the Village Board of
Trustees at this upcoming Village Board Meeting will serve as closure to the Neighborhood Traffic Study
for Zones 3, 4 & 10.
Please include this item on the July 20 Village Board Meeting Agenda. Representatives from the
Engineering Division will be in attendance to present the results of the post- studies and final
recommendations as well as answer questions.
Attachments
Neighborhood Traffic Study Zone Map
Zone 3 — Traffic Regulation, Volume & Speed Maps
Zone 4 — Traffic Regulation, Volume & Speed Maps
Zone 10 — Traffic Regulation, Volume & Speed Maps
c: Village Clerk Lisa Angell
h: l engineering \trqffic l ritcp l zones3 -4 -6 -101 vb, final _ report_3 -4 -10. doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE TRAFFIC ZONE MAP
SEMINOLE LN
1
CAMP MCDONALD RD CAMP MCDONALD RD
co
._.
2 o
H �
� J
., EUCLID AV
KENSINGTON RD
GREGORY S'
2 „ ,p
NO ,p rHivFTrH
w
CENTRAL RD
LINCOLN ST
0
U
O
z
O
2
GOLF RD
- GON4,„,,R m POST - STUDIES COMPLETED &
DEMPSTER ST PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
ti o POST - STUDIES PRESENTED FOR APPROVAL
b „ 1 8
IFS j
l l i
9L
OAKTON ST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING THE:
RESIDENTIAL SPEED LIMIT PROGRAM &
RESIDENTIAL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY - ZONE 3
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LEGEND
<- STOP SIGN
< YIELD SIGN
e TRAFFIC SIGNAL
e CAMP McDONALD RD B
it
o p
1 Y O a
O 0 0
o =
D O PRIVATE RD
o
ono p
W
1-
8
0
c
1-
x
J
W
EUCLID AVE 0
O,, STRATFORD PL
4 (— NK RD
OXFORD PL
pw 8UNTING
ALBION LN
w Q
LL ` ,pO
LARKDALE L'
O S y
[OE � W
ORIOLE LN
16C W
KENSINGTON RD i
ALL STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS HAVE A 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT
CAMP McDONALD RD D
NOT TO SCALE . p
Q a
0 O n <0 c�
O \ : v u p
O 0
W
Z 1 ,--,= )
' O Bt O O PRIVATERD N
0
p LO Lnrn 0
CC
co O"i f` 0
X 9 1 0
0 "' r) LEGEND
�0 00 = ORIGINAL STUDY TRAFFIC COUNTS
I (SPRING 2008)
(00)= FIRST POST STUDY -J
TRAFFIC COUNTS (FALL 2009)
[00]= SECOND POST STUDY
TRAFFIC COUNTS (SPRING 2010)
EUCLID AVE
2 __ 11
0 O O ,.0,
0 in r-?NN
l oo N 85 No —"
9F. �� STRATFORD PL w
(42) o
BOB 0 LINK RD Q 1 � � q � 155
(306) \ J 0,, OXFORD PL
F 2 (180)
75 [192] r-)
BUN NG L 1 p5 C) �M 00
N (118) J '\�\ <1
rnN [711] L" No0 • "' `� II `'
, i5 • Cn O V , 7,..?„, W ALBION LN vu V
(92) `
N IW O
W
u ' LARK DALE LN ¢ 120 �O
(120) - r-
81 w ��
ORIOLE LN N m
(86) Lna Lr
rr) )C°
• M O �
�' KENSINGTON RD
PROJECT: TITLE: PROJECT N0: 09_130
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMPARISON OF DAILY K
SECOND POST STUDY ZONE 3 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FIGURE NO: 5
4
CAMP McDONALD RD
NOT TO SCALE 37 35 V
O 0 0 (36) (35)
[37: 35]
a
O ¢ O
2 Th \
O U ^
W
z a
0 0
N
O O PRIVATE D
O
Cr
0
q4/ (28) (27) LEGEND
O 0 [34 [33] 1-
t 00 = ORIGINAL STUDY SPEED STUDIES
(SPRING 2008)
(00)= FIRST POST STUDY _1
SPEED STUDIES (FALL 2009) w
[00]= SECOND POST STUDY
SPEED STUDIES (SPRING 2010)
EUCLID AVE
20 21 22 24
N (23) (23) _, (22) x(25)
I o O aoR-, [197
PF �,P STRATEORD PL 3
DD o
N O c c--) a r--,
N M I�
BOB 0 LINK RD C"f � q V:: I N N u
I'�� / OXFORD PL
� _ Q N " lJ M Ih
BUNTING L — �° 00° N cv
I` ^ BUNTING L � V r CO
26Lu26 ^ 26 J c p `L'\-\
(22) a (23) (24) (23) 19 21 , �,� °, \ti
[23_ _,,-, C28 I 247 ' (1 (1 ti
to _ n ALBION LN
ALBION LN
u 92 �
L n z a i9 P
v O O
,O LARKDALE L o `�
0
y a CO ^ a
� ^ r'`o 28 t 26
(26) x(26)
_ ORIOLE IN 'n
21 22 -� (2531222)
(22) (21) [24: 23]
KENSINGTON RD
—1 I I I I I
PROJECT: TITLE: PROJECT N0: 09 -130
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMPARISON OF
SECOND POST STUDY ZONE 3 AVERAGE SPEEDS
FIGURE NO: 6
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY - ZONE 4
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s0
LEGEND
SE- STOP SIGN
I<--- YIELD SIGN
9 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
EUCLID AVE DOGWOOD LN
4
G _ BARBERRY LN
•
� ALDER LN BARBERRY LN -��
■ 1511141M 1
O
f
W
x
CEDAR LN �
BARBERRY LN
rc
m
,, ' rc
CEDAR LN , <r O
1 DOGWOOD LN m
��GWOOD LN d ,
Z Z
c DOGWOOD LN m a GREENWOOD DR
p3O 3
^ K ELDERBERRY LN ¢ l
J Z� m LINDEN LN j
.� cP g 3 3
J�
GREEN • m F t
WOOD DR
, O �� LINDEN Ff
q F
S a '1
HACKBERRY LN F -, 0
■ c
pODD!Yfl
i
IRONWOOD DR m
w
z
e KE NSINGTON RD i
I ALL STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE A 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT EXCEPT FOR THE BOXWOOD AREA (20 MPH)
a
w
J
Q
p 11, 0
V T
I in
F- Cn
1- 0
0
Z
Oa dloM fo
z
(Lb) Nl Aaa3NV9 0 08 LL
f N
Z
3
m O
Q O
3
°w 0
2 N
O J Y
a a
(:68 > r d J
(8L£)
Nl 380WVJAS 0
F
� o
v �
U
N3BM \
[( 8 2 1 (81 :8 1 839838
N _
Li _
i °o Ni Aaa39M3N \ \
bZi
E OIb CL I. A3 elnN-1 A3 CY
>--
o
NT
Oa 31V01S3M Cz o J —
8 O- N1 a3d>Nnr r- �O 6 ld 000MN081 J o Q O � O Z CD J CI-
Q g Q cn
o M W
J 3
0 • o ` � , (019) (f) 0
s
La ao In c l (o I-
0
a I ; 019 I - Z
� a Cn = z
£09 M �oG z O U O
bLS �E = U ci V)
Ni xJO1W3H Z.) O —
717
O�� p N u
Z U LL
C o CC
a• P9 NF� ,� o Z Li L Q Q
G i • ° o L._ Q CZ
_ L
0
pP� '- O 0 0
>_ O I-
,b£9 1/41.9'V) 0 F - Cn
CRABTREE I N I - di
S89 ( Cr) 1- :°°°
LN U) O F
C8Z£J J O (Z
(00£) Q Cl O
O „ 1_ z I- ¢ Z (D U) O U
° m LJ_I CC W CJ_ Z
f- N W O LL C (n O
wwtn 3 O IV z . J II II ^ i .. . O • i9 0 CJ_ > - cfs)
C68Z9J o I-
(Z£09) ° Z I
W CZ99S7 Z V)
SSG9 (OL£S> O
021 JNI�33 N
/ 3 1 SAS O 0
g0
o (96L O Z
(Of ) Q O
30 000Mxoe j -I U
it w J w
> (n
O
CC
d
W
J
0
0
N O
M
T up
01
~O 0
z
021 OM 0
z o
t z
N Nl Aaa3NV9 L...1 l!1 V N J D
_ li
E
Z
112:e _BZ]
( ZZ w °Z) (IZI :OZ) co: Z -ZZ) (LZ: ° (6Z) _ —
m 81 OZ £Z bZ a 8 8Z
o
¢
a
m z
Z
e (OZ z (61)
91 LI
z W
J(
J G 3 V /)
•� 06 7.1P) 8 a 1
8 0
N N N N 0
Ni 3801 LL
N N IR/ (ZZ)
_
N, IZ OZ CL
o (1)
VInV
J ¢ o Ni Aaa39M3N N N N
w m m Nl Aa a 39MJN w
U
¢ O OD Q V / r
_ ^ N �J
a
I- ' N I Aa213e1111,4 CL
( o (2) IZ 8 6 W
a
Gel 31VOIS3M „
NN —
11 0 N J—L W
N N u T
a
rEJ CD In IS)
tDN Ni a3dINOf NN (('J (2) (WI 6, N
cil
8t 61 j ld 000MN06I
LL
w 3 (IZ) w (6U C �(\J CV - 0
a (ZZ) ° L 1 J CC
(OZ S (OZ) (bZ (H) (£Z 61 CC
o
I 61 3 61 £Z SZ OZ 61 Q n Z
J cr L , ( £zI 0
( £Z CO (n LLI a m NC -4\9c LLI F- Q
Ni x301W3H MN N 0_ 0 Cr) o 6u _ NN M N ( f� CL
N `� Q ,N..1 O F
G`iF'F -Nf,F N ° Z 0 0
NN L 1 o N 0 I-1-1 U) U
o
(0Z: (81) � z w w U7
OZ 81 GP� v > 0
O
06 N N rO Cn
N N
CRAW BEE L Cr) F— J
01 N N N I O � .N N N J O 0 F-.
N Q a- 0
0 Z 1 Z I- V r —� O c� m F O NNE L i - i (__) W w W a- Z
i ° x ' z 3 ° w OZ) (9 ( 9Z ) L1J 0 L_ Cl) V) O
J ° m SZ SZ w O fV
J 11 11 111 (Z Z a (£Z (0Z) o (ZZ) (6I) W (0Z) (SZ z i @ is) d CC
r
SZ w SZ 61 8 £Z OZ £Z 9? . 02
o o 0
olOQ oo w I
NNN o Z F—
tr+ CB id Z (n L. N N 0
F
NNN � pa ONI�33HM N
E N NIN ( L O
[LI] o 18I) N N O 0_
(91) o (L1) w
3 O
OZ o LI NNE2 O z
as aooMxoa / H Q 0
U J cu
N
0
Cc
0_
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY - ZONE 10
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 77
ti�
LEGEND
4110(-- STOP SIGN
l<— YIELD SIGN
9 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
4
o e
,8* ) WI LN
U w- 1
HARVEST DR) ( , LOWDEN LN
`'
9< CARDINAL IN
Eli a SMALL LN
O % O K JEFFERY DR
E CALLERO CR < g 3 :7" p O m
� \ u o Q o .J Q k f AS i 1/4 MTICHELL DR
o N
ARDYCELN THAVERST
O LL
' // TMAYER . M ARK DR J
O
CENTENNIAL DR I
i 3 O J W HENRY ST . %
F Q 5 ,
I� K d
m
m
GREEN p ilk y/
■
CENTRAL RD 9
ALL STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE A 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT
I N. 1
W
-J
Q
0
0 O
M
O
T in
1- o 0
z
08 dlOM 6
• . z o
ffi + oP 1 z
o
CV Lr1 f O \ /w o N� a y , S 1U
M P4l
U m FP. ro 1-0 O S
- a `rd rA cr 0
'(6LI) 2 2 MD o Cl- i'
Ni S31VA 4 Z r , 80 318830
LOZ 591
(ZIZ) (£SS)
Ni NOSN3A31S
OSZ r ` Ob9 ' ` '
[ (Z9) (£ZI)
N
Ni N33N30 ' Ni NOS83NN3 0 N w
51 mFur?) / ST1 w NT u 3
ow Nr- ul 2
v' 0 ("^' tor- [ZZ9] J
�� \(ILb) (b99)
o J m \ N1 83880 ~ N _ 06£ •b9
0 o
[9IZ] . cr
(£ZZ) (091) 3 J U
Ni N011V81S ¢ —
00Z SLI LJ-
,n ,n z LW
L0 Ln w
(Sb£) lY
ON V1130101
SI£ ~
o ulir � >-
M G N J
[8£6] IT C£581] Q
(8£9) (ZZLI)
OH 31V01S3M
OL6 £Z61
3 o3v z,, 0
o _
00 a~.. N ' N
O Z `D cwi M
p p V ti M Z
3 0
10 ONI1 —
U 09£ CC
0 o Q
a 0
C (IIL) w
3AV 0183 w Q
09L ) U
[L91]
(\ 3AV 1f3N CT)
U) I— W
E F— Z J
(n Z F=
O r
P 1 Z O (__) z pJl) = (--)
0 O H O
U (� (1_ U
L� � W W
y pp\1 O
fl- O
�°� PI' Q I- X Ni
o i_ O 0
N
NI co N = I— I- 0
b r y c0 Cr) F- p (/)
s N(n�CLN
s J c) (SD N
ye s Q (-7 a- N (.3 0 O
�� O Z= J O CL
z C : ' W p z
w 0_ cc Q (--) c1r
CCcn w(n a
W O �-' Lc- � - if J O
J 11 11 11 w J LJ
t9 m -) > N
iS) @ 0
a
e
•
W
J
0
0
N 0
M
O l.0
0
O
O
Z
Oa dloM o
Z o
(SZ) (93) �o �° CSZ] 9Z] Q + °P U Z
frZ SZ (bZ) (£Z) o y> s
s SZ SZ y 0 D
¢ o , 11: cc 0
N N 2 2 !T OD b�
Ni S31VA 'l \ � Na 3101330
\ti
N N N N
cc
i
rM 2 Mt[1
N N N N
Ni NOSN3A315
• NM N a
N N N_
ti R- m M oo / CIZ] z :ZZI
•.• N NN / (6I) J (ZZ)
Ni N33N30 r Ni NOS83P* 3 LI w 9I
C6Z] J SZl a [bZ] (bZ) °' mm La
(LZ) w (9Z) (OZ) bz (/)
0 Z
QMN NNN
SZ - bZ (LI) (9I) \ � NNN . ` W
•
jz 1Z Ni 83N808
m NMM , 1p
N NN /W/�
N• N N
N u LL
M 1 N ON 3 (/)
N'' N N Z J
, =
Ni N011V81S s G
N�pM , N ` GC
H
(V ,'-,
(NJ
z o
(6I) (61) — v
NON 03 IZ Q
Oa V1130NYY
N �1 W
N N F- >
(£Z) c, (33) Q
33 r £Z
a
O OO, NM_� LL
M Mu
Oa 31V31s3M u O
co 10� 01 N
NN "' "'� Z
z
0
° (32) _ (IZ) (J)
° Zz 1 ZZ (£Z) r (£Z) —
o ° bZ a £Z (9I) (91) CC
L'
F.I. 6I 0Z Q
10 ONI1tl0
E Na
U N
K 0
3 °
U
M N a 2
C NN
3M J)N 3 w
N
N (V
N O ti
r N�
C 3AV 1I3N
¢ ' N +N N U) w J di
° " W O F.
a
> SC M� \,N W = I-
,3 ‘ 34,-
a , Cr) I- O
)- w U
2J Cf) D w I'� w
a z i W (Z D z
2 O
` (J) O n- >_
1:71 p
(£p (OD > _ I —
£[ ZZ 0 ~ Z 1_
3 co
`, � � 0) cn CS) I-- m ° CV F
V)
9 w
�"'2 Q W cV 0
�s7� o z I— � ° z�
z p CC U) _I (D CC w 0
Cl.. cc U�
w 1_1._ w CC (.n .-. (., Cr-) (, z
/ J U
J n ii U J W
iii (9 @ (S) > (/)
C ig ig O
cc
0
Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
M P
MEMORANDUM
1. 1 -
1r
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
i w to
FROM: BRIAN SIMMONS, DEPUTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIR CTO'
"rx
DATE: JULY 12, 2010
PRIVACY POLICY REGARDING INFORMATION OBTAINED FO'
OF MOUNT PROSPECT GRANT AND LOAN PROGRAMS /'{
The Village of Mount Prospect operates various programs which offer forms of financial assistan °° o
residents for either purchasing or making improvements to their homes. These programs often require
applicants to submit confidential paperwork such as tax returns, bank statements, or pay stubs in order
to qualify them for the program. The Village has always handled these records in a strict confidential
manner but has never adopted a formal policy to govern their protection. In order to receive funds as
part of the Illinois Housing Development Authority's First Time Home Buyer Program, the Village was
required to adopt a privacy policy to oversee the maintenance of records for program participants. The
proposed policy will comply with both Federal and State laws governing the safeguarding of borrower
financial data. As drafted, the policy would cover the following Village programs:
• CDBG Home Weatherization Grant Program
• CDBG Single - Family Rehabilitation Loan Program
• IHDA First Time Home Buyer
• Basin 14 Project
• EECBG Energy Efficiency Home Weatherization Rebate Program
The Privacy Policy has five primary components which require the Village to: (1) designate one or more
employees to coordinate the Policy, (2) identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to
the security, confidentiality and integrity of Borrower Information, (3) ensure that safeguards are
employed to control the identified risks and that the effectiveness of these safeguards are tested and
monitored, (4) select service providers that are capable of maintaining appropriate safeguards and
require them to be followed by contract and (5) evaluate and adjust the Policy as necessary. The
adoption of the policy will provide avenues to control who has access to these records, offer training to
staff members who handle confidential records, and insure the long term safety of program participants'
financial data.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Village Board approve the attached resolution formally adopting a Privacy Policy
Regarding Information Obtained for Village of Mount Prospect Grant and Loan Programs.
I concur with the above recommendation.
11 PLAMMEMOS\2010\Privacy Policy _July2010.doc
CERTIFICATION
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REGARDING THE ILLINOIS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY'S PRIVACY POLICY REQUIREMENTS
The undersigned hereby certifies to the ILLINOIS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY ( "IHDA ") that the Village of Mount Prospect has complied with the requirements
of IHDA, as set forth in its letter to the undersigned dated the 1 day of March, 2010, including
the Village of Mount Prospect's adoption of a Privacy Policy Regarding Information Obtained
For Village of Mount Prospect Grant and Loan Programs (the "Privacy Policy ") that complies
with the GLB Act, the Safeguard Rule, the Disposal Rule and the PIP Act, as described in the
Privacy Policy, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Certification to be duly
executed as of this day of , 2010.
The Village of Mount Prospect
By:
Printed Name: Michael Janonis
Title: Village Manager
250355_2
EXHIBIT 1
PRIVACY POLICY
REGARDING INFORMATION OBTAINED
FOR VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
GRANT AND LOAN PROGRAMS
A. Policy.
The Village of Mount Prospect (the "Village ") provides financial assistance to qualified
persons (the "Borrower ") under certain of its grant and loan programs (the "Program "). In that
regard, the Federal Trade Commission has established policies and procedures for safeguarding
certain information obtained from or about Borrowers (the "Safeguard Rule "), as required by the
Gramm -Leach Bliley Act (Pub.L. 106 -102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999) (the
"GLB Act "), and also requires that financial institutions take appropriate measures to dispose of
such information (the "Disposal Rule "). In addition, the Illinois Personal Information Protection
Act, 815 ILCS 530/1 et seq. (the "PIP Act "), requires any entity that handles, collects,
disseminates, or otherwise deals with non - public personal information to provide notice of any
breach of the security of such information to that person. The Village is subject to the
requirements of both Acts whenever Borrowers provide it with non - public personally identifiable
information or the Village otherwise obtains such information about a Borrower in connection
with providing Program services to the Borrower.
The Village hereby establishes and adopts this information security policy ( "Privacy
Policy ") to assure compliance with the GLB Act, the Safeguard Rule, the Disposal Rule and the
PIP Act. This Policy is designed to:
• Ensure the security and confidentiality of Borrower Information.
• Protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of
such information.
• Protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result
in substantial harm or inconvenience to Borrowers.
• Provide notice to Borrowers in the event of a breach in the security protecting the
information occurs.
• Properly dispose of any of the Borrowers' information.
B. Definitions.
"Borrower Information" is defined as any record containing non - public, personally
identifiable information, whether in paper or electronic form, that the Village obtains from an
applicant, a Borrower, an employee or other third party, in the process of offering a financial
2503552
product or service from the Village; or such information about a Borrower provided to the
Village by another financial institution; or such information that the Village otherwise obtains
about a Borrower in connection with providing a financial product or service to the Borrower.
"Non- Record Material" shall mean (1) material not filed as evidence of administrative
activity or for the informational content thereof; (2) extra copies of documents preserved only for
convenience of reference; (3) stocks of printed or reproduced documents kept for supply
purposes, where file copies have been retained for record purposes; (4) books, periodicals,
newspapers, posters, and other library and museum materials made or acquired and preserved
solely for reference or exhibition purposes; and (5) private materials neither made nor received
by the Village pursuant to state law or in connection with the transaction of the Village's
business. Duplicate files, copies, library materials, and stocks of obsolete blank forms or
pamphlets originally intended for distribution are not considered to be official records or record
copies.
"Program" means Village- sponsored financial assistance through 1) non - commercial
loans; and 2) all loans or grants which require the applicant to provide name, address and any
one (1) of the following: social security number, state drivers license or identification card
number, or an account number, credit card number or debit card number.
"Records" mean all books, papers, maps, photographs, digitized electronic material, or
other official documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made,
produced, executed, or received by the Village in connection with the transaction of public
business and must be preserved or appropriate for preservation as evidence of the organization,
functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the Village, or
because of the informational data contained therein.
"Record Retention Policy" means the Village's record retention policy that provides
guidance in establishing and maintaining an efficient records management program.
"Service Providers" mean all third parties who, in the ordinary course of the Village's
business, are provided access to Borrower Information.
C. The Information Security Policy.
The five elements of this Policy require the Village to: (1) designate one or more
employees to coordinate this Policy, (2) identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external
risks to the security, confidentiality and integrity of Borrower Information, (3) ensure that
safeguards are employed to control the identified risks and that the effectiveness of these
safeguards is regularly tested and monitored, (4) select Service Providers that are capable of
maintaining appropriate safeguards and require them, by contract, to implement and maintain
such safeguards and (5) evaluate and adjust this Policy based on the results of the testing and
monitoring, any material changes to operations, or any other circumstances that have or may
have a material impact on this Policy.
1. Safeguard Program Coordinator
2503552
The Village hereby designates the Village's Deputy Director of Community
Development as the person who will be responsible for implementing and maintaining this
Policy (the "Safeguard Program Coordinator "). The responsibilities of the Safeguard Program
Coordinator include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) The Safeguard Program Coordinator must identify the individuals at the
Village's office who have access to Borrower Information and the Safeguard Program
Coordinator must maintain a current listing of these individuals.
(b) The Safeguard Program Coordinator must identify potential and actual
risks to the security and privacy of Borrower Information, evaluate the effectiveness of current
safeguards for controlling these risks, design and implement additional required safeguards, and
regularly monitor and test the application of this Policy.
(c) The Safeguard Program Coordinator must ensure that (i) adequate training
and education programs are developed and provided to all employees with access to Borrower
Information and that (ii) existing policies and procedures that provide for the security of
Borrower Information are reviewed and adequate.
(d) The Safeguard Program Coordinator must identify Service Providers with
access to Borrower Information, ensure that these Service Providers are included within the
scope of this Policy and maintain a current listing of these Service Providers.
2. Risk Identification and Assessment
Under the guidance of the Safeguard Program Coordinator, each employee or member of
the Village with access to Borrower Information must take steps to identify and assess internal
and external risks to the security, confidentially and integrity of the Borrower Information. At a
minimum, such risk assessment must consider: (a) employee training and management, (b)
information systems, including network and software design, (c) information processing, storage,
transmission and disposal and (d) detecting, preventing and responding to attacks or other system
failures. The Safeguard Program Coordinator must ensure that risk assessments are conducted at
least annually and more frequently when needed.
(a) Employee training and management include:
(i) checking references prior to hiring employees who will have
access to Borrower Information;
(ii) asking every new employee to sign an agreement to follow the
Village's confidentially and security standards for handling Borrower
Information;
(iii) training employees to take basic steps to maintain the security,
confidentiality and integrity of Borrower Information, such as: (a) locking
250355_2
rooms and file cabinets where paper records are kept; (b) using password -
activated screensavers; (c) using computer passwords with at least six
characters long including numbers; (d) changing computer passwords
periodically and not posting passwords near employees' computers; (e)
referring calls or other requests for Borrower Information to the Safeguard
Program Coordinator; and (f) recognizing any fraudulent attempt to obtain
Borrower Information and reporting it to the Safeguard Program
Coordinator;
(iv) reminding all employees of this Policy and the legal requirements;
(v) limiting access to Borrower Information to employees who have a
business reasons for seeing it; and
(vi) imposing disciplinary measures for any breaches.
3. Borrower Information Safeguards and Monitoring
The Safeguard Program Coordinator must verify that employees with access to Borrower
Information design and implement reasonable safeguards to control identified risks to the
security, confidentiality and integrity of Borrower Information and that the effectiveness of these
safeguards is monitored regularly. Such safeguards and monitoring must include the following:
(a) Employee Management and Training
Safeguards for information security include training of those individuals with
authorized access to Borrower Information. The Safeguard Program Coordinator must develop
appropriate training and education programs for all affected current and new employees.
(b) Records Safeguards
Safeguards for Records and Non - Record Material containing Borrower
Information must include:
(i) creating and implementing access limitation to Records containing
Borrower Information;
(ii) storing Records containing Borrower Information in a secure area
with limited access;
(iii) protecting Records containing Borrower Information from physical
hazards such as fire or water damage;
(iv) disposing of outdated records containing Borrower Information
pursuant to the Secured Destruction of Borrower Information section of
this Policy;
2503552
(v) disposing of Non - Record Materials containing Borrower
Information when they cease to be useful pursuant to the Secured
Destruction of Borrower Information section of this Policy; and
(vi) other reasonable measures to secure Records and Non - Record
Materials containing Borrower Information during the course of its life
cycle while in the Village's possession or control.
(c) Information Systems Safeguards
"Information Systems" include network and software design, as well as data
processing storage, transmission and disposal. The Village must implement and maintain
safeguards to control the risks to Information Systems, as identified through the risk assessment
process. Safeguards for the Information Systems must include:
(i) creating and implementing access limitation to Information
Systems that stores Borrower Information;
(ii) using secure, password - protected systems within and outside the
Village for access to the Information Systems that stores Borrower
Information;
(iii) regularly obtaining and installing patches to correct software
vulnerabilities;
(iv) permanently removing Borrower Information from computers,
diskettes, magnetic tapes, hard drives or other electronic media prior to
disposal;
(v) protecting the Information Systems from physical hazards such as
fire or water damage;
(vi) detecting, preventing and responding to network attacks or other
Information Systems failures; and
(vii) other reasonable measures to secure the Information System that
stores Borrower Information during the course of its life cycle while in the
Village's possession or control.
4. Service Providers
The Safeguard Program Coordinator must identify Service Providers with access to
Borrower Information. The Safeguard Program Coordinator must ensure that reasonable steps
are take to select and retain Service Providers that are capable of maintaining appropriate
safeguards for Borrower Information and must require Service Providers, by contract, to
2503552
implement and maintain such safeguards. Non - public personal Borrower Information shall not
be provided to third parties for marketing purposes.
5. Monitoring And Testing Safeguards
The Safeguard Program Coordinator must develop and implement procedures to test and
monitor the effectiveness of information security safeguards. Monitoring levels must be
appropriate to the probability and potential impact of the risks identified, as well as the
sensitivity of the information involved. Monitoring may include sampling, systems checks,
systems access reports and any other reasonable measure.
D. Notice To Illinois Borrowers.
1. Notice of Privacy Policy: The Village will annually provide notice of its Privacy
Policy, in substantially the form set forth in Attachment A, which is attached to this Policy, to
applicants and recipients of its Programs during the continuation of such customer relationship.
Such notice will also be provided prior to establishing a relationship with an applicant, i.e.,
before the applicant discloses any nonpublic personal information to the Village Such notice may
be provided in the manner described in subsection 3 below.
2. The Village shall display the Privacy Notice where it will be visible to all
applicants and Borrowers.
3. Notice of Breach: Following discovery or notification of a breach of the Village's
security of Borrower Information, the Safeguard Program Coordinator shall notify Illinois
residents at no charge that there has been a breach. The notice shall be made in the most
expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with any measures necessary
to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable integrity, security and
confidentiality of the data system. The notice shall be provided in writing, by mail to the last
known address or in person, or electronically so long as the electronic notice is consistent with
provisions regarding electronic records and signatures for notices legally required to be in
writing pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 7001.
E. Secured Destruction Of Borrower Information
The Village shall dispose of outdated Records and Non - Record Material containing
Borrower Information in accordance with its Record Retention Policy and in such manner as to
ensure the security and confidentiality of such information. Pursuant to the Disposal Rule, the
Village must take reasonable measures to dispose of Borrower Information to avoid the
unauthorized use of, or access to, Borrower Information in connection with its disposal.
Although the Disposal Rule does not mandate a specific form of disposal, the Village has
determined that such disposal shall be conducted by shredding. Outdated Records and Non -
Record Material containing Borrower Information shall be shredded only at the direction and
approval of the Safeguard Program Coordinator and as provided in the Record Retention Policy.
F. Review And Adjustment Of This Policy
2503552
r
The Safeguard Program Coordinator must evaluate and annually revise this Policy in
connection with the results of the testing and monitoring described above, as well as any material
changes to the Village's operations, including changes in technology, the sensitivity of Borrower
Information and any other circumstances that may reasonably impact this Policy. The Safeguard
Program Coordinator must review this Policy annually to assure ongoing compliance with GLB
Act, the Safeguard Rule, the Disposal Rule, and the PIP Act, and as well as consistency with
other existing and future laws and regulations.
G. Strict Adherence To Information Security Policy
Employees of the Village, who may have access to or receive Borrower Information shall
become familiar with the requirements of this Policy regarding information security and strictly
adhere to them.
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
2503552
•
ATTACHMENT A
PRIVACY NOTICE
TO APPLICANTS AND RECIPIENTS OF
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT GRANT AND LOAN PROGRAMS
As an applicant and /or recipient of a Village of Mount Prospect grant or loan program
that requires the Village to collect non - public personal information from your application and
consumer reporting agencies, the Village of Mount Prospect would like to advise you of its
privacy policy. This non - public personal information includes your address and other contact
information, demographic background, loan status, family income, social security number,
employment information, collection and repayment history, and credit history.
We disclose non - public personal information to third parties: 1) only as necessary to
process and service your grant or loan; 2) only as necessary to effect, administer or enforce your
grant or loan; 3) with your consent; or 4) as permitted or provided by applicable laws, including
the Illinois Freedom of Information Act ( "FOIA ") and the Privacy Act of 1974. Applicable laws
permit disclosure to third parties for certain purposes. Examples of such disclosures include (i)
disclosure in connection with enforcement purposes or litigation, audits or other investigations;
(ii) to comply with proper requests under FOIA or other federal, state, or other local laws and
regulations; and (iii) to federal and state agencies to the extent specifically permitted or required
by law. We do not sell or otherwise make available any non - public personal information about
you to any third parties for marketing purposes.
We protect the security and confidentiality of non - public personal information by
limiting and monitoring all physical access to sites where non - public personal information is
kept. A complete copy of our written privacy policy is available upon request.
If we decide to change our privacy policy, we will provide you with a revised privacy
policy containing such changes.
If you have any questions, please contact
, Phone Number:
VILLAGE:
The Village of Mount Prospect
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
2503552
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A
PRIVACY POLICY REGARDING INFORMATION OBTAINED
FOR VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT GRANT AND LOAN PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect provides financial assistance to qualified
persons (the "Borrower ") under certain of its grant and loan programs (the "Program "); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Trade Commission has established policies and procedures for
safeguarding certain information obtain from or about Borrowers, as required by the Gramm -
Leach Bliley Act (Pub. L. 106 -102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999), and also
requires that financial institutions take appropriate measures to dispose of such information; and
WHEREAS, the Illinois Personal Information Act, 815 ILCS 530/1 et seq., requires any
entity that handles, collects, disseminates, or otherwise deals with non - public personal
information to provide notice of any breach of the security of such information to that person;
and
WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have considered
the Privacy Policy Regarding Information Obtained For Village Of Mount Prospect Grant and
Loan Programs (the "Privacy Policy "), a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof
as Exhibit 1, and have determined that said Policy is in the best interest of the Village of Mount
Prospect and its residents and complies with the aforementioned state and federal laws and rules.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS:
b
250355_2
SECTION 1: The recitals as set forth above are incorporated herein by reference and
made a part hereof as material and operative provisions of this Resolution.
SECTION 2: The Privacy Policy is hereby adopted and approved.
SECTION 3: The Village of Mount Prospect and all its officers and employees, who
have access to Borrower Information as defined in the attached Privacy Policy, are subject to its
provisions and shall follow and abide by the provisions thereof.
SECTION 4: The Village Clerk shall cause a copy of this Resolution and the attached
Policy to be delivered to each officer and employee of the Village who is subject to the
provisions of the Privacy Policy.
SECTION 5: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption
and approval as provided by law.
ADOPTED this day of , 2010, pursuant to a roll call vote as
follows:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Irvana K. Wilks, Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa. Angell, Village Clerk
2503552
n>utu Piospcct
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE BOARD AND FINANCE COMMISSION 31U P
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR lZb
DATE: JUNE 9, 2010
SUBJECT: PROPOSED CIP: 2011 -2015
Improvements '
Attached hereto is the proposed 2011 -2015 Cap ital p rovements Plan (CIP). The pro \
being considered for the year 2011 total $6,737,880. The five -year total for all proje( -,
$54,132,847.
We encourage you to read the Manager's transmittal letter beginning on page ii. This /
correspondence describes the purpose of the CIP, highlights some of the more significant
projects, and reviews project funding. To help you evaluate our ability to fund the requested
projects a five -year financial forecast is provided for the major operating and capital project
funds that support funding for the CIP. These forecasts can be found in Section H of the
document.
In general, the projects being presented directly relate to the monies expected to be available.
However, from reviewing the CIP requests in conjunction with the five -year financial forecasts I
would like to direct your attention to several project areas.
General Fund
The CIP is showing the five -year average of projects being paid from General Fund revenues as
$416,000 (A -10). This is slightly higher than the amount of capital projects typically funded by
the General Fund on an annual basis due to a new project related to a proposed storm sewer
inspection program. The program is proposed as a ten -year inspection cycle and is anticipated
to cost $100,000 annually. I would like to point out the five -year financial forecast for the
General Fund. This forecast is showing an operating deficit in 2011 of $2.7 million with annual
deficits increasing each subsequent year through 2015 ($6.1 million). Based on this information
it is likely that many non - critical projects will be deferred. See the complete five -year forecast
for the General Fund beginning on page H -1.
Motor Fuel Tax Fund (MFT)
Receipts from motor fuel taxes beginning after 2011 are expected to grow by just 1% through
2015. Due to this low level of growth in revenue, the street resurfacing program for 2011 was
scaled back. The program for 2009 and the current year (2010) have also been scaled back to
the level of available funds. The street improvement budget for 2012 -2015 still reflect full
program costs. These project years will also need to be scaled back if revenues cannot support
the higher levels.
Proposed CIP
June 9, 2010
Page 2 of 3
Capital Improvement Fund
The Capital Improvement Fund is meant to support intermediate sized capital expenditures for
various departments that are non - recurring in nature. Some examples of these projects are
Detention Pond Improvements, Emergency Generators and public building improvements.
Supported by a one - quarter cent home rule sales tax, there is approximately $1.1 million
annually available for these types of capital projects. Projects included in the five -year plan
after 2012 will need to be further prioritized with some deferrals to bring the total annual amount
down to what can be supported with current revenue streams.
Street Improvement Construction Fund Projects
The forecast for the Street Improvement Fund (H -11) is showing a positive fund balance of
$192,921 at the end of 2010, but the fund balance will become a significant deficit by the end of
2012 due to stagnant revenues. Revenue to support the program comes from the state and
local motor fuel tax and one - quarter cent home rule sales tax. Each of these revenue sources
is expected to either show minimal or no growth over the next several years resulting in fewer
funds available to fund the street program. Adjustments to the amount of work planned each
year will be necessary if these revenue sources do not rebound during 2011.
Flood Control Construction Fund Projects
Major projects in this fund are set to resume in 2011 when funding from the home rule sales tax
becomes available. Previously, the tax was allocated to support debt service from earlier flood
control projects. Beginning in 2011, approximately one -half of the tax is freed up to fund various
projects. Prospect Meadows storm sewer and ditch improvements ($1,000,000) is scheduled
for 2011 -2013. In addition, the Hatlen Heights storm sewer project is slotted to begin in 2015
and is expected to cost $1.9 million. It is anticipated that there will be sufficient funds on hand
by that time to begin the project. See the complete five -year forecast for the Flood Control
Construction Fund beginning on page H -12.
Water and Sewer Fund
There are several large capital projects included in the CIP for 2011 -2015. The first is the
ongoing Combined Sewer Improvement project started in 2005. The total cost for the project
was originally estimated at $15 million and expected to take 10 years to complete. Funding for
this project comes from a $5 per month sewer construction fee and basic sewer usage fee.
Based on early results, overall pricing is coming in lower than originally estimated and
completion will likely occur before the planned 10 years. Other major projects include ongoing
sewer and water main replacements /rehab averaging $891,000 per year and water tank rehabs
totaling $975,000. The cash and investment balance is projected to decrease through 2015 so
projects will have to be prioritized and deferred to a level where they can be supported by
ongoing revenues.
I: \CIP1201 1 -201 5 \2011 -2015 CIP - Board Memo June 2010.doc
Proposed CIP
June 9, 2010
Page 3 of 3
Funding to be Determined
The CIP is showing two projects where funding has yet to be determined. These projects
include the Ash Removal and Ash Replacement programs expected to cost $1.8 million over a
ten -year period. Work began in 2009 on a program to treat Ash trees in an effort to prevent
infestation of 800 existing White, Blue and Manchurian Ash trees. These trees are not part of
the program and will not require removal and /or replacement.
Meetings to review the CIP are scheduled for June 24 (Finance Commission) and July 13
(Village Board). Staff looks forward to discussing the project submittals and their impact to
operations.
Copy: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager
Dave Strahl, Assistant Village Manager
Lynn Jarog, Deputy Finance Director
Department Directors
I: \CIP \2011- 2015 \2011 -2015 CIP - Board Memo June 2010.doc