Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutII. COW Agenda Item Draft Minutes 02/23/2010 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES February 23, 2010 I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. in the Village Board Room of the Village Hall, 50 South Emerson Street, by Mayor Irvana Wilks. Present at the meeting were Trustees Paul Hoefert, Arlene Juracek, John Korn, John Matuszak, Steven Polit, and Michael Zade!. Staff present included Assistant Village Manager Dave Strahl, Public Works Director Glen Andler, Public Works Deputy Director Sean Dorsey, Water and Sewer Superintendent Matt Overeem, and Administrative Analyst Michael Dallas. II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES A motion to approve the minutes of January 12, 2010's Committee of the Whole Meeting was made by Trustee Korn and seconded by Trustee Polit. All trustees approved the motion, except for Mayor Irvana Wilks who abstained. Additionally, a motion to approve the minutes of January 12, 2010's Special Meeting was made by Trustee Hoefert and seconded by Trustee Matuszak. All trustees approved the motion, except for Mayor Irvana Wilks who abstained. III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD No citizens requested to be heard. IV. DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS RULE STAGE 2 COMPLIANCE & HYDRAULIC WATER MODEL Assistant Village Manager Dave Strahl initially introduced the topic of discussion and emphasized that the water distribution system computerized hydraulic modeling report should be characterized as a water system capital improvement plan and not as a mandate. Additionally, he noted that any projects related to this model will be funded using existing capital funds within the water fund. Public Works Deputy Director Sean Dorsey started his presentation by describing the initial purpose for the water system model: the Disinfection By-Products Rule. He indicated that the Rule, promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). was intended to reduce the potential for the creation of disinfection byproducts in water systems. These disinfection byproducts, some of which could be carcinogens, can be produced when chlorine, added to the water system as a disinfectant, breaks down after time. The hydraulic water model was used to determine where the water within the system was the oldest. Public Works employees then tested chlorine levels at those locations to determine the levels of carcinogens. After running the model and taking multiple samples, it was determined that the Village has very clean water and very low carcinogen levels, thus eliminating the need to conduct future monitoring or take corrective actions. Mr. Dorsey stated that the water model was also used to evaluate how the Village's water system responds to pressure variances. A water system model had not been conducted since the 1980's and not since the Village began receiving water from the H:\VILM\MDallas\Meeting Minutes\COW Minutes 2-23-10.doc Committee of the Whole Page 1 of 4 2/23/10 Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency (NSMJAWA). Mr. Dorsey emphasized that the software modeling is the most practical way to test the water system and simulate demand to see how the system reacts throughout the Village in light of different scenarios (emergencies, capital improvements, heavy usage periods, and other). Mr. Sean Dorsey then introduced Mr. Randy Patchett, a consultant from Burns and McDonnell, who conducted the water system study. He began his presentation of the water distribution system computerized hydraulic modeling report by confirming that the Village met the U.S. EPA Disinfection By-Product Rule requirements. Then he discussed the Village's existing water system, identifying the supply, storage, and distribution system. He described the computer software used to the model the Village water system, known as the MWH InfoWater Suite, and explained in great detail how the software was calibrated to correctly model the Village's water system. He then noted the model's evaluation criteria, explaining what would be considered good conditions for the system. Mr. Patchett conducted two different types of simulations: (1) a steady state; and (2) extended period simulation. The steady state scenario, which modeled the Village's water system utilizing a day with maximum usage, indicated that NSMJAWA could meet the Village's water supply needs without the Village's existing booster pump stations and elevated tank operating, but could not distribute the water adequately without the assistance from the stations or the tank. Accordingly, he stated that booster stations would have to operate and be actively managed in order to distribute the Village's water. Mr. Patchett also conducted another steady state simulation to verify how the system would perform on a maximum use day with firefighting demands. He identified the fire flow requirements for the types of structures in the Village. The results of the model simulation indicated that the Village would need to use booster pump stations to meet potential fire flow demands. He also noted that under these conditions water pipe around the booster stations and tanks could be more stressed due to the additional usage demand impacting smaller diameter water main exiting booster and tank locations. Mr. Patchett recommended enhancing the automation of the booster pump stations to address these concerns. Using fire flow analysis illustrations, Mr. Patchett compared the difference between a Village system operating with no booster stations and one operating with the recommended supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system improvements (modifications to the control logic). Mr. Patchett also conducted an extended period simulation on the Village's water system which helps show flow patterns for water quality and where water quality might be deteriorating. He reemphasized that the Village's water quality is very good and well above the national average. The extended period simulation indicated that all NSMJAWA supply facilities had inefficient pumps, and its high velocity and pressure contributed to the Village's water main breaks. The simulation also examined alternative sources of water, including existing wells and interconnections. The results indicated that if the NSMJAWA supply was lost, the Village could bring its existing wells on-line to supply a sufficient amount of water to its residents. Committee of the Whole Page 2 of 4 2/23/10 Mr. Patchett's analysis also evaluated the water connections across Northwest Highway. He noted that the low pressure experienced south of Northwest Highway could be mitigated by improving the SCADA logic to the booster stations, as well as installing an elevated tank south of Northwest Highway or adding more water connections that cross Northwest Highway. Mr. Patchett also examined the Village's water main break history. While not excessive, he noted the number of breaks was higher than the national average. He identified some possible causes for the breaks, how the Village is addressing those breaks, and some correlations between the breaks and the operation of the elevated tank and booster pump stations. Finally, Mr. Patchett identified the report's multiple recommendations, including their estimated costs and benefits. Before inviting comments or questions from the Village Board, Mr. Dorsey reemphasized the report's recommendations would be gradually phased-in over time, and that ultimately the report should be considered a water system capital improvement guide. General comments, questions or concerns from the Village Board included the following: · Very thorough and detailed report; · Do we put chemicals into our wells; · When replacing water pipes, do we use thicker pipes to reduce stress on the water distribution system; · Are the booster pumps variable speed; · How long does it take for chlorine to break down into its by-products; · How does NSMJAWA water delivery affect the Village's water pressure; · How do we determine how a water main or pipe breaks; · How does the SCADA software work to manage the water pressure in the system; · Does Public Works own the software to model the water system for future use and can it conduct the simulations; · Where was the system difficult to model; · Should there be concern about the water pressure on the south side of the Village of Mount Prospect; · Should residents be concerned about water sitting in faucets; · How does water flow in the system; · Does the Public Works Department receive water pressure complaints; · How do we control high pressure surges; · Does chlorine have any negative affects; · Do we charge other communities for providing them water; · If the Village had multiple water towers throughout the community, would it still need booster pumps. Before moving on to the next agenda item, Mr. Dorsey presented the status of the Public Works Department's Sewer Maintenance Program. He noted that over fourteen (14) miles of combined sewer mains and over nineteen (19) miles of sanitary sewer have been rehabilitated to date. He also noted that all Category 5 defects, eighty-three percent (83%) of Category 4 defects, and ten percent (10%) of Category 3 defects in combined sewer system have been repaired. Committee of the Whole Page 3 of 4 2/23/10 V. ENERGY STRATEGY PLAN Michael Dallas, Administrative Analyst, described the Energy Strategy Plan's major revisions since it was first introduced in December 2009 and then invited questions and comments from the Board. General comments, questions or concerns from the Village Board included the following: . Easy to understand and use as a guide in the future; . Identify the terms "sustainability" and "renewable energy"; . The Plan can be used as a part of the education process; . Does the Village pay for all of the train station's energy costs; . Are the number of therms used at the Public Safety building (under Figure 2.2) correct; . Concern about establishing a sustainability committee. VI. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Mr. Strahl had nothing to report. VII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Mayor Wilks briefly discussed the 2010 Census promotional efforts. She also provided a brief update on the Levee 37 project. VIII. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:37 p.m. Committee of the Whole Page 4 of 4 2/23/10