Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/20/1968 VB minutes MINLWlF~ OF THE REGULAR I~rING OFTHE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES Febr~,av,~ 20~ 1968 .- CALL TO ORDER CALL TO OPDER Presidei~t Congreve called the meeting to order at 8:05 P.M. ~-' INVOCATION I~JVOCATI DN Pastor E. A. Zeile of St. Paul Lutheran Church gave the invocation. ROLL CA~L ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: President Congreve, Trustees Rieter, Grittani Kilroy, Lewis Rogers, Teichert APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS M~'rING MIhU0~ES Trustee. Reiter, seconded by Trustee T~ichert~ moved the minutes of the regul~ar meeting of February 6, 1968 be approved as submitted. Upon roll call: Ayes: R~iter Grittanl Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Moti°n APPROVAL OF .BTLT.2 BILLS General[ 46,175.16 Parking Sy.stem Revenue 65o81 Kfbrary 8,720.01 Lib.rary Bldg. Bd.& Iht. 1961 12,?04~90 Waterworks & Sewerage F~nd 9~696.8~ ??,~60.72 Trustee Kilr~y, seconded by Trustee ~rltteni, moved for approval of the abovebi~ls for payment. Upon roll call: Ayes: Reiter Gritteni Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Motion carried. Trustee Kilroy~ seconded by Trustee Grittani, moved to accept the Financial R~port for the month of Ja~,~y, 1968 subject to audit. Unanimous. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Tex reduction Mr. George Flaherty, ~19 S. Geroge appeared before the Board to express appreciation applTeciation for the tax reduction Mount Prospect residents have enjoyed, expressed but spoke in support of higher salaries for police and firemen and applying the taxes toward more pay for Village personnel. P~.'t'ITIONS ~ CO~JNICATIONS propose5 Request From. P. Gregory Conlon on a proposed ordlnancee regarding Ord. re: "Conflict of Luterest" was referred to Public Health and Safety Committee~Conflict of Intrest ~ proposed agreement be$~ween the Village of Mount Prospect and Northern ~GREk~JNT Illinois Gas Company upon passage of an ordinance granting a fifty year NO. ILL G~2 franchise was referred to the Jt~diciary Cormmitt~e. D.A,M.P. C~ommission Report~ was referre~ to the Public Works Committee. D~MP P~iPOPT  PRO~I.d~'~TIONS L.~.gine e r J_n g President Congreve proclaimed February 18 to 2~ as Engineering Week. Week Feb 18 24 President Congreve proclaimed the period of March 4th to llth, 1968 to be "Enow ~four Town Week". Know your town week 3/4-3/11 FAIR HOUSING RESOLUTION 4-68 Trustee Lewis read the following statement to the President and members of Res. 4-69 the Board: Fair Housing "I don't remember who said it, but I agree with the statement that" a new ide~ .... is seldcm anything more than a deft manipulation of old concepts devised~to help solve current problems." Arid one of t~e most current problems...among the ~any foreboding foreign February 20, 1968 air Housing Statement ~nd domestic crises facing us...is the civil rights struggle going on today, which, in suburbia, Seems to be focusing on"Fair" or "Open Housing". Certainly the concept of equal rights for all...which includes open housing o~ fair housing. . .or whatever you want to call it...is as old as the Federal Constitution itself. But evidently, many in today's society seem to believe that this old concept, so clearly spelled out, has to be reite~at~ed and strengthened today by local reinforcement. And I believe t~t that is probably good~:, Because for far too long, too man~ people have been looking to the Federal Government and the State Government for paternalistic protection. So, if local reiteration is necessary today to reinforce the inalienable rights already given to all men, under our Constitution...and if local reiteration will in any way held to guarantee these inalienable rights.,.then I believe that we, as elected officials of this Vil$~ge, who have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, should make it crystal clear to all that that is what we intend to do. The apparent need For reiteration of the guarantee of equal rights for all, has con~ about, we all know, by the struggel of the black American to gain certain freedcms heretofore denied him. There is no doubt, that the treatment of the American negro in many, many areas of our country...if not in Mount Prospect...has, over the years, been absolutely deplorable. Or, an even better summation, perhaps, is to say that the manner in which he has been treated, is completely sinful in the fullest theological interpretation of-the word. But let me also say that I have Just about reached the end of my tolerance for those who live among us, for those in government, and for the many selfstyled leaders of.the civil rights movement, both black and white, who point the finger of g~ilt at we suburbanites where they claim have fled to the suburbs to isolate ~urselves from ~eality snd from the prebleme of the inner city...forsaking sympathetic concern for the "underdog" and the underprivileged. This just is not so. I sub~Lit that the suburbanites today, living in co~unities like ours, are the ,achievers in this world...people who recognize~ problems and tackle them head on,..people who see the opportunities at hand and take advantage of them...we're the people who mere often than not have struggled financially to get an education, we're the ones who work those many extra hours a week at our Jobs Without asking special favors...we're the people who are active in our churches, in our communities, in social welfare agencies, and on boards of education...we're the people who carry the br~nt of the tax b~rden that supports the ne'er-do-wells, the underachievers, the addicts, the drifters, the losers,..we're the people, who with a great sense of responsibility, carry more th~n our share of the necessary work load to this. world squarely on our sholders, I, personally, make no apologies for being a sub~u~bardte and I am bored with the criticism and ridicule we have been subjected to from those outside our own circle...and I am resentful of the criticism heaped upon us by those well-intentioned people from within our circle whose criticism, I submit, stocks of a sick form of self-degradation and their accusing finger contributes nothing to solving the problem of eggs,1 rights for all men...~theirs included. But I wa~t it clearly understood, that the Resolution I'm about to propose for the consideration of this Board is not in~ended to be a "sop"or a salve for anyone's conscience. Rather, it is to make it clear to all that this Board believes that all persons, regardless of race, color, creed, or national origin, must be afforded their God-given right to live wherever their economic circumstances and freedom of choice leads them. Also, it is my hoep, that this Resolution will be received by all men, black and white, in the spirit of fairness for all...which is its intent. And I further hope that it will help to act as a catalyst for all of us.. elected officials, appointed members of our various boards, relators, home owners, apartment owners, renters, businessmen, housewives, everyone... to strive to do all that a self-center ~hu~nan being can do to help foster better i~h~y February 20, 1968 race relations, and help to make the fUll scope and intent of this Resolution, con~01etely effective ." Res. 4-68 Trustee Lewis read Resolution No. 4-68: Fair Housingo A RESOLUTION INSURING FAIR HOUSING FOR ALL CITIZENS IN THE V~LL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Trustees Reiter, Grittani, Rogers and Kilroy cmmmended Trustee Lewis for introducing .this resolution. Trustee Teichert read the following statement: "I have given careful consideration to the resolution proposed by Mr. Statament re: Lewis. I find nothing that is in conflict with r~y personal beliefs, and Fair Housing I ~ind nothing that is contrary to the laws of our State or Country. I do not see anything that is hermful to the community, nor do I see anythLug that diminishes .the individual rights of our citizens. I am in agreen~n$ with all that is stated therein. Accordingly, I am compelled to vote "yes" for this resolution. This determination is, of course, based solely on the question before us ·..not on whether this resolution goes far encroach, or whether there is scme other alternative. Mr. Lewis is asking but one t~ing...do you agree with his statements? I do, and I always have. As pointed out, this resolution singly reiterates the present law...the law which I have sworn to uphold, and in which I believe. Row then, could I possibly refuse to subscribe to this as a matter of policy? For m~self, there would appear to be only two reasons for voting "no" on this resolution...one, that it is an unnecessary and therefor unless act ...or, two, that it does not do enough~ As to the first, I would agree that this resolution does not co, mit us to a~ytLpg more than our existing cc~mlttments...however, this does not mean its ~sage would be useless and unnecessary. ROlic~ statements are most definitely useful and necessary since they confirm publicly and expressly the terperament of the Board. Certaioly t~e temperament of this Board is that it believes in law and order, and equal rightso..why, then, should we refrain frcm saying so? There caa~be ao harm.in "reiterating" what we already believe i~, or "reiterating" that .which we are already conm~tted to. However, a failure to reiterate our beliefs or committments can be harmful, for it suggests that we do not so believe or that we are not st committed. In this respect, I am forced to recall that in the past the Village Board has used the "unnecessary and useless" ar~sm~-nt to defeat other reiteration ty~e resolutions. 0. which only confused the basic issue involved. For example, ~the manager-by-referendum resolution and the library resolution. Both of those resolutions asked only for public confirmation that what was ~nderstood to be true, was actually true. Both were killed...not because anyone disagreed with what.was stated...but, because they were supposedly "~necessary and useless". The failure of the Board to reiterate its beliefs and c~ittments in the past, has raised doubts as to its intentions and aggravated the problem involved. I submit that such is the case before us now. ~ The question is not whether passage of this resolution will do us any good, but rather will its rejection do us any harm? ~ As to the second, there are many who seek changes in, or additions to, ? our existing laws...they will say that this resolution does not do enough. i Even if that were so, it is still no basis for refusing to "reiterate" our belief in law, order, and equal rights...I am sure that those who seek specific things in our laws sould, themselves, not be in disagreement with anything stated in the proposed resolution. If that is so, then it should be sufficient that under our form of government, the passage of this resolution does not preclude any citizen from petitioniug for the passage of other resolutions or ordinances. Mr, Lewis as a member of this ~oard has placed a- resolution before us. He has stated his beliefs and is asking in we agree with them·..yes or no. His request does not prohibit any of us, or any citizen, from similar requests of their own. For this reason, and because the resolution is clearly self-explanatory, he is not asking for a study session, but merely February 20, 1968 Fair Housirg Statemen a vote..,I believe this ~s proper. Whether or not other action should be taken is not relevant to the merits of the resolution before us. Frankly, I do not believe that passage or rejection of this resolution will have any effect on the ultimate issue of open-housing l~gislation, Eventually, we will h~e to face that issue, which is not of "reiteration", but one of "implementation". Aside from amending the Federal and State Constitutions, every law passed implements the basic or general law of the constitutions. It is the scope or degree of implementation that is the hard problem...that is, whether implementation is necessary or not necessary? But the question of "implem2ntation" is not before us...tonight we are concerned only with reiteration of basic, acceptable principles. Regardless of how anyone feels about implementation, I find it difficult to believe that any peraon would be in disagreement with this refteration resolution. However, since open-housing has emotional overtones, our actions ~eebound to be criticized whatever the result. For m~self, since I believe in the statements set forth in the proposed resolution, I must vote "yes"." Trustee Lewis, seconded by Trustee Kilroy, moved for passage and approval of Resolution 4-68. Upon roll call.:_ Ayes: Reiter Grittani Kilory Lewis Rogers Teichert Congreve Motion carried. Mr. ~Paul Johnson, 133 S. Kenilworth, President of the Mount Prospect Human Relations ConEittee, appeared before the Boar~ to speak for himself and not as a member of the Committee, expressing appreciation to the Board for this forward step and stating an ordinance for fair hoUSing~ in~- Mount Prospect is necessary. Paston E. A. Zeile spoke of~ civil rights as related to black power. He said the resolution would, develop some kind of "teeth" that might show itself in terms of leadership, and will aid when some of the matters come before the clergy. Mrs. George F, Hoope, Jr., 202 MacArthur Drive, was given an opportunity to comment upon passage of the resolution. Dr. ScheaffezFL00D WATER DRAINAGE Drainage Dr, John Schaeffer was invited to appeas before the Board to discuss drainage problem~ in the Village and possible solutions. Dr. Schaeffer is interested in research analysis of urban hydrology and his program would be to consider the invironment to get an insight into the type of program to be followed. This would entail an analysis of the topog~aphy and the retention and diversion of water as well as possible benefits to be derived. Eetain Trustee Teich~, seconded by Trustee .Reiter, moved to retain the services services of of Dr. Schaeffer for the purposes of rendering a study of water resources Dr. Scheafferand problems for an amount not to exceed $3,000. Upon roll call: Ayes: Reiter Grittani Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Motion carried. C0~WI'r~ CHAIP~N REPORTS ~- 0t~D. 2052 Bt~TT,DING COlV~v~I'l'l%E Height Trustee Teichert read For second reading Ordinance #2052: Ordinance AN ORDINANCE AME]tDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VUJ,AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM BUr~.DING HEIGRT' IN VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS Trustee Teichert, seconded by Trustee Rogers, moved for passage and approval of Ordinance #2052. Under discussion, Trustee Teichert, seconded by Trustee Rogers, mo~ed to amend the motion to show Section 22 {C) Height Regulations: 30 feet in height instead of 28 feet. February 20, 1968 pc~ roll cal.1: Ayes: Reiter Grlttaui Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Motion carried. ~omprehensive COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT Plan Text Mr. Malcolm Young,. ]~ of the Mount Prospect Plan Com~ission, 1st reading presented the Comprehensive Plen Text for first reading by the Board. The Clerk was requested to place this on the agenda for March 5th, and a special meeting is scheduled for March 12th for: final adoption. FIRE AND POLICE CC~$~TfEE No parkin~ Trustee Reiter read for first reading an ordinance prohibitingparking on N. side of the north side of Golf Road from Mount Prospect Road to I-Oka Ave. and Golf Rd. requested the Clerk to place it on the March 5th agenda for second reading. Trustee Reiter read for first reading an or~Irmnce prohibiting No encroach- encroachments along the right-of-way of Golf Road as improved between ments along Mount Prospect Road and I Oka Avenue, He requested the Clerk to place ROW on Golf it on the March 5th agenda for second and final reading. Trustee Reiter read for first reading an ordinance amending Sec.24,801 amend Sec. prohibiting the discharge of sanitary or industrial waste into State 24.801 constructed storm sewers located on Golf Road between Muunt Prospect Road and Elmhurst Road and requested it be placed on the March 5th agenda for second end final reading. Trustee Reiter requested "Sub-lease N. Central Businessmen parking lot" be dropped from Committee. Approved. JUDICIARY CO~I'I'I'~E Ord 2053 Trustee Lewis read for second reading' Ordinance 2053: Amend Village Plan Art I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I~ SECTION 6 OF THE VILLAGE PLAN Sec 6 Enforce Trustee Lewis~ seconded by Trustee Teichert, moved for passage and approval of Ordinance 2053. Upon roll call: Ayes: Reiter Grittani Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Motion carried. 0rd 2054 Trustee Lewis read for second reading Ordinance 2054: Amend Village Plsn Art II AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II, SECTION 6 OF THE V~¥.L~GE PLAN Sec 6 Lot LOT DEPTHS Depths Trustee Lewis~ seconded by Trustee Teichert, moved for passage and approval of Ordinance 2054. Upon roll call: Ayes: Reiter Grittani Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Motion carried. Ord. 2055 Trustee Lewis read for second reading Ordinance 2055: Flood Plain Ordinauce FLOOD PLAIN ORDINANCE Trustee Lewis ~ seconded by Trustee Teichert, moved for passage and approval of Ordinance 2055. Upon roll call: Ayes: Reiter Grittani Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Motion carried. Ord. 2056 Trustee Teichert ~ead for second reading Ordinance No. 2056: Sign v~riation~ F~n~ner Cooper AN ORDINANCE GRANTING ADDITIONAL VAP~IATIONS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON 68-4A THE SOLWi~ SIDE OF KENSINGTON RAOD BETWEEN WILSHIRE AV~wI~ AND RAND BOAD (FARMER COOPER'S) Trustee Teichert~ seconded by Trustee Lewis, moved for passage and approval of Ordinance No. 2056. February 20, 1968 Trustee Reiter stated the proposed farm type haywagon the petitioner requested should be considered a sign and is an attractive huisance. Trustee Teichert, seconded by Trustee Leiws, amended his ori~%nal motion to change the last two sectences of Para. ~, to read "so long as same is stationaly and does not become an attractive nuisance or fire hazard." Upon roll call: Ayes: Girttani Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Nays: Reiter Motion carried. School Dist. 59 request Request by School District #59 to annex property near Pheasant Trail, ~nex prop- west of Busse Road: A portion of this property is already withi~ the erty Near Village limits and it is the desire of School District 59 to hve the Pheasant entire tract within the Village. The Judiciary Committee recc~Eends Trail the proposed ar~exation. Trustee Lewis, seconded by ~k~ustee Teichert, mvoed to refer the request to the Plan Commission. Unan~us. Case 67-25P Case 67-25P rezone Request bY Salvatore DiMucci to rezone property conmonly known as 401 ~. 0olf 401 W. ~GOlf Rd. as follows: Parcel i (Lot B) from R-1 to B-B ~and Parcel 2 (Lot 4) from B-1 to B-B. The petitioner did indicate at a public hearing that he would accept a B-2 zoning for each p~rcet which the Plau Commission, by a vote of 6-1, with i pass, recommends to the Board of Trustees. P~ose of the remcning request ts to per~it~ Mr. DiMucci to erect a free-standing bank building on the north ' portion of Lot ~ and part of LOt 4. Upon re~vewing the petition, the Judiciary Co~Enittee had some concern regarding the status of the various zoning classifications of th~s property and felt that a more feasible approach for the Village would be to resubdivide lots ~, 4, 5 and 6 into one lot under the general zoning classification of B-l, (Lit 6~, and an additional variation to allow the bank building requested ~y the petitioner on what is not Lot B, as a penmitted use. Case 67-25P The Judiciary Conmtlttee recomnends that this case be returned to the Plan returned Co~ssion with the Shove-noted recc~mendations and that a fu~ure~ he~ ~. to Plan before the Plan Con~nission be at no a~fti~nal expense to the petitioner. Trustee Lewis, seconded by Trustee Reiter~ moved the petition to rezone property at 401 W. Golf Road be retr~aned to the Pla~ Con~ssion for another hearing at no additional expense to t~e~etitioner. Unanimous. Case 67-~0P Case 6?-BOP- Request by ?~lau Co,ssi°n - Village initiate proceedings to ~Tg corner rezone the northeast corner of Main Street aud Busse from B-~ to P-1 for ~in & Busseparking. This property, under a sub-leasing arrangement with th& N. rezone from Central Business Association, which organization had lease~ the p~ope~ty B-~ to ?-l from the Mount Prospect State Bank, has been used and ~f~tained by the Plan ConE. Village as a parking facility. The lease has now expired and~ Cannot b~ recommended renewed because the State statutes which disallow a bank to own property~ denial for move thsn five years which is not used ~n connection with~bankfng functions. The property is now being used by the bank for employee After a public hearing, the Plan Commission by a vote of 7-0, recon~nends denisal of this request for rezoning since P-1 is paved off-street pa~king without fee, which, in their judgement, would amount te~60~fisc~tion of property - ~, Board The Judiciary Co~nittee, by a vote of 2-0, recc~mends that tHe-~Board Of denied Trustees concur with the Plan Cc~ssion and deny the petition. Trustee petition Lewis, seconded by Trustee Reiter, moved to concur with the p~an 'Cc~s~lon and deny the petition. Upon roll call: Ayes: Reiter Grittani Kileoy Lewis Rogers Teiche~rt Motion carried. Februa~ 20, 1968 Consent Decree OTHER BUSINESS 65 L9036 Certain amendments have been made to the Consent Decree No. 65L 90B6 - Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank vs. Village of Mount Prospect. Signatures Di Mucci have been affixed by the Plaintiffs and the documents were forwarded to Eenilworth attorney Marlin Smith. ~ he Village Manager requested authorization of thePropervy President to siva on behalf of the Board. The Decree will be redrafted to be executed by Pioneer Trust and Savings Bank with the works "with form" deleted from the executed copy. Trustee Teici~ert, seconded by Trustee ~Reiter, moved the Board concur in the Manager's recommendation regarding the Consent Decree and suthorized the Village President to sisp on behalf of the Village. (This matter concerns the DiMucci Kenilworth property. ) Upo~ roll call: Ayes: Reiter Grittani Kilrey Lewis Rogers Teichert Motion carried. The Village Manager reported the attorney for United Air L~ues forwarded United Air a letter with a rough draft of a covenant to be supplied the Ceok County Lines draft Board of Appeals for ten years to the types of uses now being occupied of covenanv by the United Air Lines west of Linneman Road. Trustee Teichert, re: Linnemann seconded by Trustee Rogers, moved the Board accept the offer of a tan- Rd. & Dempsver year covenant. Unanimous. Propose~ Resolution endorsing the State Constitutional Convention was referred to Resolution re the Building Cmmmittee for review and reconimendatian. State Constitu Convention Trustee Teichert read far first reading an ordinance of Intent to annex territory commonly known as "Fairview Gardens" and requested it be placedFairview on the next agenda for second reading. Gardens 1st readir%~ The Village Manager reported that Greeley and Hansen had made an appraisal of the water system in Fairview Gardens in 1964 and would update this Greeley ~ report ~r051,500. It would take approximately foum to six weeks for theMansen wa~er study. Trustee Te~bhert, seconded by Trustee Lewis, moved the Board system apprais. authorize the appraisal, at a cost not to exceed $4500. Fairview Garde~ Upon roll call: Ayes: Reiter Grittani Kilroy Lewis Rogers Teichert Motion carried. The Village Manager reported on the existing retention basin located at Retention the northwest corner of Busse and Golf. He stated that under the consent Basin ~ deci~ee entered October 18, 1967, on of the requirements was to submit to corner Busse the Village the title for the basin. A legaly description was prepared & Golf by Harker and Malloy and a deed dated November 27, 1967, sigued by Title ~ Pioneer Trust and Savings, was forwarded to the Manager with restrictive Covenants covenanOs to the Village as long as it remains a retention basin. Trustee Teichert, seconded by Trustee Reiter, moved the Village accept the deed and record same. Unanimous. Dempsver ~-~ Mr. Moore further stated Mr. DiMucci would draw up a plat of survey DiMucci indicating position of buildings and street c~dications and easements. Developem~nD The easement would be to Utility Water and Sewer Company. The Manager further reported aside from those two points it is in accordance with the terms of the ordinance, but that he did not have the linen in his possission a~ this time. This matter refers to R-~ Plarmed Development on Den~pster Street property. l~l~i~IS TO BE Rk~'~RRED Case 68-5P Case 68-5P Mobil Oil Plat of Subdivision.. Plan Cc~mmission reconmends approval. Referred to Judiciary Co~mlittee. Water srea~ment Bids for water treatment chemicals were referred to Public Works Cormmitte~ids Safety Com~.iss, Safety Con~mission Report referred to Fire and Police Committee. reporv Utility Sewer Reques~ frcm Utility Sewer and Water re additional well installed in requesv for that system was referred to Public Works Committee. nSw well. Fiscal year independent audit referred to Finance Con~ttee. Fiscal Year indep en~ ent aud it February 20, 1968 ase 68-2P Callick Corporation request to rezone 810 East Northwest Highway frOm B-3 to B-2 was referred to Judiciary Committee. · Case 68-BP Callick Corporation request to rezcne 846 E. Lincoln R-1 to P-l' was · referred to Judiciary Corm%ittee. -- Gunnells Gunnell's liquor license was referred to Finance ~,,~lttee. ' · liquor licenes Request for annexation of residential property at 1400 W. Lincoln-was ~_~ 1400 W. referred to the Judiciary Ccmmlttee. Lincoln ~ ' !, request FOR INFOBMATION ONLY annexation Northwest Nunicipal Conference - Wednesday, February 21, 1968 at 8:00 P.M. Palatine 'Village Hall, 54 S. Brockway. Each of the member comm~nitie's were requested to bring their general master plan maps, so that the Conference could have a discussion of Future growth, boundaries, inter- governmental relationships. Officers of the Northwest Numicipal Conference for the ensuing ysar are:. President - Ted C. Scanlon, Village President of Wheeling, Vice President- Daniel Congreve, Moyor, and Secretary/Treasurer - Berton Braun, Village Manager, Palatine. Mufich Buick Case 67-13P ~tto~n~ey for John Mufich Buick withdrew Case 67-l~P requesting rezoning withdrawn From R-1 to B-3 property located on west ~ide of Rand Road between by atty. Thayer and Henry Streets. C0~'I~J'~:~:~: ANNOUNCEMENTS , Fire and Police- March llth ....., . =~ ' Public Health and Safety - February 21 (Air PollutiOn Oridnance) Public Works - Wed. Feb. 28 in Public Works Building Judiciary - March 1 (Mufich Bhick Case 68-1~).) Building ~ March 6 to study portable swimming poo! ordinance · Finance Coramittee - Feb, 26 -Gunnell's liquor license and budget Trustee Grittani, seconded by Trustee Reiter moved the meeting be adjourned. ~ ~' : Time: 11:30 P.M. Unanimous. RICHARD H. MONROE, Village Clerk