Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/12/2000 COW agenda COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday, December 12, 2000 50 South Emerson Street 7:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald L. Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 28, 2000 III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IV. AMENDMENTS TO REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX At the October 10, 2000 Committee of the Whole meeting, the Village Board undertook a discussion regarding Amendments to the Village's existing Real Estate Transfer Tax Ordinance. The main focus of discussion was shifting the responsibility for payment of the Tax from the buyer to the seller. Additionally, staff took the opportunity to recommend a number of drafting revisions designed to make the Ordinance more readable as well as adding a provision that would require the payment of the Tax on long-term business lease transactions. As part of the Board's deliberations, there was considerable discussion regarding the need to provide a "rebate" mechanism by which persons who paid the Tax as buyer would be given an opportunity for relief should they find themselves now having to pay the Tax again as seller. It was determined that an open-ended rebate could cost the Village several million dollars in lost revenue over an extended period. Some consideration was given to a short "rebate window" in order to limit potential revenue loss while still providing an opportunity for current sellers to obtain relief from the prospect of double taxation. Ultimately, a majority of the Village Board determined that the responsibility for payment of the Tax remain with the buyer due to the complexity of coming up with a workable rebate mechanism. The other recommended changes to the Code were approved as presented by staff. An Ordinance amending the Real Estate Transfer Tax (sans a shift from buyer to seller) was presented at its November 8 meeting. At the first reading, Trustee Wilks asked that the Board reconsider the question of who is responsible the payment of the Tax. A majority of the Board indicated they were willing to revisit the topic. NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE A T '100 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064. As part of the October 10 discussion, staff surveyed Northwest Municipal Conference communities to determine those that had a Real Estate Transfer Tax and who was responsible for paying same. Of the 15 respondents, only Mount Prospect and Niles listed the buyer as responsible. In the interim, staff secured, through the assistance of a local attorney, a much more comprehensive list of municipalities that impose the Tax and who is responsible for paying same. This list (included) is produced by Chicago Title and Trust and I believe represents the most comprehensive and up-to-date listing on the topic. Of the 70 municipalities listed, 18 (approximately 26%) place the responsibility for payment of the Tax on the buyer. Assuming that the focus of further discussion is limited to who is responsible for payment of the Tax, a decision to switch from buyer to seller raises the concomitant question of whether a "rebate window" should be established whereby homeowners who paid the Tax as buyer and now find they are again responsible for paying the Tax as seller have the opportunity to limit their Tax burden through a credit against the amount of Tax they originally paid as buyer. Included in the information package is a memorandum from Finance Director Douglas EIIsworth highlighting pertinent information critical to any discussion of this topic. V. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT H :\GEN\Cow~,genda\121400 COW Agenda.doc