HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/26/2000 ZBA minutes 36-2000 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-36-2000 Hearing Date: October 26, 2000
PETITIONER: Kevin & Julie Anderson
PUBLICATION DATE: October 11, 2000 JOURNAL/TOPICS
REQUEST: Conditional use to allow construction of an unenclosed porch addition within
25' of the front property line
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Mr. & Mrs. Kevin Anderson
Richard Hendricks
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Elizabeth Luxem made a motion to approve the
minutes of the September 14 meeting, seconded by Keith Youngquist. Chairperson Arlene Juracek made a correction
to the minutes of the ZBA-26-2000 case. Elizabeth Luxem made a motion to approve the corrected ZBA-26-2000
minutes and the minutes of the ZBA-33-2000 case, Leo Floros seconded the motion, and the minutes were
unanimously approved. At 8:01, Ms. Juracek opened Case ZBA-36-2000, a request for a conditional use to allow
construction of an unenclosed porch addition within 25' of the front property line.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the
item, a conditional use to construct an unenclosed front porch and said the case would be Village Board final. Ms.
Connolly said that the subject property is an existing home located on an interior lot on a single-family residential
street. The home is currently set back 30.05-feet from the front lot line. The applicants propose to construct a 5'x19'
unenclosed porch along a portion of the front of the house. The porch would be attached to the front of the existing
home and set back 25-feet from the front property line. The petitioners are adding a second story addition and the
porch will create a unified look to the residence. As with other conditional use requests for a porch, the petitioners feel
that the proposed addition will enhance the home and add a desirable feature to the structure.
Ms. Connolly reported that the subject parcel for the proposed conditional use is a 7,232.5 square foot parcel
developed with a single family home. The applicant proposes a porch that extends 5-feet into the front setback. The
proposal would have no negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed
conditional use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The
essential character of the neighborhood would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and it would not have
any significant effect on the public welfare. Therefore, staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the
Village Board to approve a conditional use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach five-feet into the required
front setback for the residence at 617 N. Fairview, Case No. ZBA-36-2000. The Village Board's decision is final for
this case.
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-36-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Kevin and Julie Anderson were sworn in and said they were adding a second story and wanted to include an enclosed
front porch on the first floor to protect the front entrance and windows.
Hal Ettinger pointed out that the second level of the home juts out and is already less than 30' from the property line.
Ms. Anderson agreed that the right side of the second story juts out two feet from the existing structure, but the
foundation does not encroach into the setback. Ms. Anderson said the plans had been designed to have the second
floor jut out and the porch jut out beyond the second floor to give a three dimensional look to the house.
Chairperson Juracek said the nature of the case had now changed, a variation and a conditional use would be required
for this project. Ms. Anderson said they had an approved permit to build the second story as it was, and had begun
construction (except for the porch).
Mr. Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development, apologized for the confusion and said staff would need to
discuss this with the Building Division to determine their interpretation of this issue and whether the variation would
be necessary at a future date. Mr. Ettinger pointed out that the contractor and petitioner were waiting for a decision so
they could continue with construction.
Ms. Juracek asked if the Board could discuss and make their recommendation on the conditional use and would handle
a variation request at a future meeting if necessary. Staff and petitioner agreed.
Richard Hendricks, a resident of Twin Lakes, Wisconsin (196 Christie Lane), was sworn in and complimented Hal
Ettinger on being very articulate and bringing this discrepancy to the attention of the Board.
Ms. Juracek asked for a motion to approve the conditional use. Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval to
the request for a conditional use to allow construction of an unenclosed porch addition within 25' of the front property
line. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion. Ms. Juracek asked if there was any discussion on the conditional use
request.
Merrill Cotten said he felt it best to approve the variation and conditional use for the enclosed porch on the property,
rather than ask the petitioner to come back. Mr. Blue said that state statutes require that the variation receive proper
public notice before the variation case could be heard.
Ms. Juracek asked for a vote on the motion already before the Board to recommend approval of the conditional use.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0.
At 9:44 p.m., Hal Ettinger made motion to adjourn, seconded by Merrill Cotten. The motion was approved by a voice
vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner
\\VH\V02\DEPT\COMDEV\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 2000\Mfl~utes~ZBA-36-2000 617 N. Fai~iew.doc