Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. NEW BUSINESS 11/03/2009 KLEIN. THORPE & JENKINS. LTD. Attorneys at Law 20 N. Wacker Drive. 8te 1660 Chicago. Illinois 60606-2903 T 312 984 6400 F 312 984 6444 00 312 984 6468 gawagner@ktjlaw.com 15010 8. Ravinia Avenue. 8te 10 Orland Parllllinois 60462-5353 T 708 349 3888 F 708 3491506 www.ktjlaw.com MEMORANDUM TO: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager Village of Mount Prospect FROM: George A. Wagner DATE: October 28, 2009 RE: Ordinance amending Article XVI, Chapter 5 of the Village Code regarding the composition of the Foreign Fire Insurance Tax Board In 2005, the Village Board adopted an ordinance establishing a Foreign Fire Insurance Tax Board in Sections 5.1601-5.1610 of Article XVI of Chapter 5 of the Village Code, as required by Section 11-10-1 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-10-1. That ordinance provided for a five (5) member board, as required by Section 11-10-2 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-10-2. However, Section 11-10-2 has since been amended by Public Act 96-505 to require a seven (7) member board, consisting of the Fire Chief and six (6) members of the Fire Department. Based upon this statutory amendment, I have prepared the attached ordinance to expand the membership of the board as required, and to address other issues related to that expansion, Le., nomination and election of members to exclude the Fire Chief and an increase in the number necessary to constitute a quorum. If you have any questions, please contact me. B 242705_1 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE VilLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT REGARDING THE FOREIGN FIRE INSURANCE TAX BOARD BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VilLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION 1: Subsection A, "Membership", of Section 5.1603, Organization, of Article XVI, Foreign Fire Insurance Tax Board, of Chapter 5 of the Mount Prospect Village Code, shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted, to be and read as follows: A. Membership: The Foreign Fire Insurance Tax Board shall consist of seven (7) board members, as follows: 1. One board member shall be the chief of the fire department, 2. One board member shall serve from the sworn rank of battalion chief and above, 3. One board member shall serve from the sworn rank of lieutenant, 4. Three board members shall serve from the sworn rank of firefighter, and 5. One board member shall serve from the department's non-sworn personnel. SECTION 2: Subsection 8, "Nomination and Election", of Section 5.1603, Organization, of Article XVI, Foreign Fire Insurance Tax Board, of Chapter 5 of the Mount Prospect Village Code, shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted, to be and read as follows: B. Nomination and Election: Except for the chief of the fire department, the board members within each of the categories in subsection A of this section shall be nominated and elected by the members of the department within the respective categories. SECTION 3: Section 5.1605, "Quorum, Special Meetings., of Article XVI, Foreign Fire Insurance Tax Board, of Chapter 5 of the Mount Prospect Village Code, shall be amended by deleting the phrase "Three (3)" in the third sentence and inserting in its place the phrase "Four (4)" to be and read as follows: Section 16.105. QUORUM, SPECIAL MEETINGS. The Foreign Fire Insurance Tax Board shall, in accordance with the Open Meetings Act, establish a regular time and place for its meetings, and publish notices of those meetings. The board shall be subject to the provisions of the Illinois Open Meeting Act. Four (4) board members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The chairman may call a special meeting at any time. A special meeting may also be called upon the written notice of three (3) board members. Such notice shall be in writing, duly signed by the board members, describing, in brief, the nature or object of the special meeting. 24235U Any person shall be entitled to appear and be heard on any matter before the board. Minutes of all board meetings shall be filed with the village clerk. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of ,2009. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\WIN\ORDINANCE2\amend ord Foreign Fire Insurance Board (3)N0V2009.DOC 24235 U 2 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department Mount Prospect MEMORANDUM ~ FROM: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2009 PZ-27 -09 SOUTH MOUNT PROSPECT SUB-AREA PLA SUBJECT: The Community Development Department is seeking approval of the South Mount Prospec -area Plan, which is a proposed amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan. Since the ay 12, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting, staff has conducted two open house meetings with property owners and businesses located within the sub-area boundaries. Based on the feedback received from the meetings, emails and phone calls, the proposed sub-area plan was modified to address raised concerns. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, October 22, 2009. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the Village Board adopt the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their November 3, 2009 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-27-09 Hearing Date: October 22, 2009 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect PUBLICATION DATE: October 7, 2009 REQUEST: South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Rogers, Chair Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Theo Foggy Ronald Roberts MEMBERS ABSENT: William Beattie Keith Youngquist STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian Simmons, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Clare O'Shea, AICP, Senior Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Bob McGugin, Valerie Roesti, Julio Barken, Kathy Balogh, Eric Nelson, Mike Nelson, Rick Anderson, Ed Ruff, Mark Jensen, Timothy Stef, David Karkubek, Jim Jakubek, Willy Sudol, Ron Boucher, Phyllis Zumph, Pat S1. Leger, Sandi Wille, Rick Bulthuis, Herbert Schardt, Pat Weldon, Bill Johnston, Eduardo Flores, Mike Cronin, Coren Raymond, Irene Blascher, Bret Asrow Chairman Richard Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. Mr. Floros made a motion to approve the minutes of the September 24,2009 meeting; Mr. Donnelly seconded the motion. The minutes were approved 5-0. Chairman Rogers stated that case number PZ-26-09, 1060 S. Elmhurst Road, Variations for Wall Signs has been postponed to the next scheduled Planning and Zoning Meeting on November 12, 2009. Chairman Rogers introduced Case PZ-27-09, the South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan at 7:42 p.m. Ms. O'Shea stated case number PZ-27-09 has been scheduled for the October 2009 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting to review the application by the Village of Mount Prospect regarding a proposed amendment to the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting was properly noticed in the October 7, 2009 edition of the Journal & Topics Newspaper. Ms. O'Shea said South Mount Prospect is situated in a very important area and has the potential for growth due to regional transportation projects. The STAR line is proposed to be located near South Mount Prospect and the O'Hare Modernization Program will make the area more attractive for global businesses. Additionally, the proposed full interchange at Interstate 90 and Elmhurst Road would make the area more accessible to the Interstate system and the airport. Ms. O'Shea stated the 2007 Comprehensive Plan called for a strategic plan for the intersection of Algonquin, Busse, and Dempster Roads to review the corridor improvements and pedestrian amenities. Ms. O'Shea said during the study to develop this plan, the Village decided to include the entire South Mount Prospect Sub-Area. The purpose ofthe Sub-Area Plan is to comprehensively review the area and plan for future growth. Richard Rogers, Chair PZ-25-09 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 22, 2009 Page 1 of 7 Ms. O'Shea said information for the Sub-Area Plan has been retrieved from interviews with businesses, residents, Village Staff, Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), CornEd, Arlington Heights and Des Plaines Staff members, reviewing planning documents, comments from open houses, e-mails, and phone calls. Much of this information was included with the Staff Report. Ms. O'Shea showed a map of the South Mount Prospect Sub-Area. It is located south of the CornEd Right-of- Way in the Village of Mount Prospect and included properties south of Oakton, and included the corporate boundaries to the east and west side of the Village. The area is generally bounded by 1-90 to the south, Des Plaines to the east, the CornEd Right-of- Way to the north, and Arlington Heights to the west. Ms. O'Shea summarized the existing conditions report that included information regarding utilities, transportation (roads and existing bus routes), jurisdictional control issues from unincorporated land, state and county roads, zoning, and land use consistency. Ms. O'Shea stated based on the reports, the goals and objectives were developed. The goals were formatted similar to the Comprehensive Plan. The objectives are more specific to South Mount Prospect. The goals are broken down by residential, Economic Development (commercial and industrial), transportation and infrastructure, and community facilities, services, and open space. Ms. O'Shea eXplained the recommendations. There are three long range planning concepts that the plan focuses on: business park, Algonquin/Busse/Dempster Commercial Center, and the United Airlines Property Office Campus. The Village was making sure the business park area south of Algonquin Road was properly marketed and has the correct amenities to attract and retain businesses. In regards to the Algonquin/Busse/Dempster Commercial Center, the Village was trying to make sure this area could be easily accessed by motorists, pedestrians, and vehicles so people could get into and out of properties and to make sure the area is safe for those who live and work around. The third long range planning concept is the United Airlines property. The Village was proposing a recommendation of an office campus if the property was to be redeveloped with open space and retail to support the office campus. Ms. O'Shea said the other recommendations were general and could be applied to the entire sub-area. These included corridor improvements and aesthetic improvements (corridor and private property). Ms. O'Shea discussed the implementation plan. The plan was geared to be implemented over the next ten to fifteen (10-15) years. The strategies that were assigned to meet the plan's goals were: related objective, responsible party, timing, and the type of strategy. Staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the South Mount Prospect Sub Area-Plan as an amendment to the Village's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Roberts asked that this was just a strategic plan; anything proposed mayor may not happen depending on several factors that included funding. Ms. O'Shea confirmed that this was correct. This was a strategic plan and the Village was looking at the area as a whole. This ensured that the Village was working with the correct departments and other organizations on improvements in the area. Mr. Donnelly asked if the STAR line does not go through, would the strategic plans still be a good idea for the area. Ms. O'Shea said even without the STAR line, the area was very attractive and has a lot of competitive advantages because of its location and accessibility to various roads. The Village would still be interested in improving the area not only from the business aspect, but for the safety of the residents in the area. Ms. O'Shea stated the Village was trying to improve the overall look as well. Richard Rogers, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 22, 2009 PZ-27-09 Page 2 of7 Chairman Rogers said this was an overall plan. He stated the area needs improvement. The STAR line would be a benefit to the community as it would bring more businesses and people to the community. Chairman Rogers stated from the Planning and Zoning Commission's point of view, this plan makes sense. Mr. Roberts stated the Sub-Area Plan quoted a percentage of housing units that are in the area. Mr. Roberts asked if Staff knew how many residents were in this sub-area or the total percentage of Mount Prospect's population. Ms. O'Shea did not have the information available at the meeting. Chairman Rogers swore in Bob McGugin, 1757 W. Crystal Lane, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. McGugin stated that the plan he saw mainly involved economic development. He wanted to know what was planned for residential, especially rezoning. Ms. O'Shea said that Village Staff was not proposing to rezone any residential properties; Staff would like to preserve the housing stock in South Mount Prospect. Ms. O'Shea stated Staff would like to focus on reinvestment to make the area more safe and pedestrian friendly so the residents could walk or bike to retail or other commercial areas in town. Mr. McGugin said that a lot of the housing in South Mount Prospect were rental units. He stated single family homes were practically non-existent with the exception of the Briarwood neighborhood. Ms. O'Shea said that Staff was not proposing to change rental properties to ownership properties. Mr. McGugin believed there were too many rental properties in the area that were potentially bringing property values down. Ms. O'Shea stated that the Village would like to keep a choice in housing for Mount Prospect. She stated that Staff was proposing to increase lighting for safety in all areas and work with landlords and investors to make sure the properties were up to safety standards. Chairman Rogers stated that the rental units in South Mount Prospect were developed because of the airport. He said as the STAR line comes in with more businesses, he believed that the area would naturally improve. Chairman Rogers hoped that the landlords ofthe properties would improve their properties as well. Chairman Rogers swore in Valerie Roesti, Business Owner at 2355 E. Oakton Street, Arlington Heights, IL (Elk Grove Township). Ms. Roesti said her business is on the south side of Oakton/east of Busse Road. Ms. Roesti was concerned that the original long range plan showed that current business would be converted to a parking lot adjacent to a hotel. She stated that the value of her business would be affected by the sub-area plan. Ms. Roesti was also concerned with the area being annexed because codes would be different. Chairman Rogers stated there was no reason to believe that the area surrounding Ms. Roesti's business would not stay as a commercial/industrial area. He said the sub-area plan would hopefully improve the area. Mr. Simmons stated the original sub-area plan was presented at an open house in June 2009 and included a plan with more detail for land uses and how the area could be re-developed. Based on comments at the open houses held in June and August, the detailed portion of the plan was removed and Staff generalized a list of appropriate land uses for the area. Mr. Simmons said the report does recommend more office/warehouse uses south of Oakton to create more of an office park, but the detailed plan with the parking lot and hotel has been removed due to public comments. There was further discussion regarding proposed land use and Village services for annexed properties. Chairman Rogers swore in Julio Barken, 547 Ida Court, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Barken wanted to know how all the proposed improvements would be paid for. He was concerned with taxes being raised for the improvements discussed in the sub-area plan. Ms. O'Shea stated the sub-area plan was a long range plan, property owners and developers would be responsible for private property. As far as streetscape improvements and public improvements, they would be budgeted over the next ten to fifteen (10-15) years. Ms. O'Shea said the Richard Rogers, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 22, 2009 PZ-27-09 Page 3 of7 Village does a lot of grant writing for this area seeking outside sources for public improvements. She said that as a part of this plan, the Village was not dOing everything at one time. Mr. Barken asked what type of businesses the Village was seeking for the AlgonquinlBusse/Dempster commercial area. Ms. O'Shea stated the Village would be doing retail and restaurant recruitment in this area because it is more service oriented. There is a large daytime population within close proximity to the South Mount Prospect area. Mr. Barken asked how many United employees would the area be losing. Ms. O'Shea stated about a thousand, which is why the Village was looking to add other jobs to the area if United moves. Mr. Barken was concerned with taxes being raised because of more police and fire protection in the area and for road improvements along Dempster. Ms. O'Shea said Dempster Street was under the jurisdiction of Cook County, but Staff would work with the county to get the road improvement on their planned projects list. She stated one of the purposes of the sub-area plan was for the Village to go to outside organizations and show what the Village was trying to get accomplished in the area. Ms. O'Shea stated the Village would benefit from additional tax revenue from restaurants, retail sales, and property taxes. Mr. Simmons said the sub-area plan indicated what the Village would like to see in the area. The improvements to the area would still have to go through the budgeting process. The Village would create a priority list for Capital projects and improvements would be made from an affordability standpoint along with projects elsewhere in the Village. Mr. Barken wanted reassurance that his taxes would not increase with all the improvements. Mr. Donnelly said United does not pay any taxes into Mount Prospect because the property is not annexed. If it does become an office park incorporated into the Village, the tax income from the property would help pay for additional services for the sub-area. Chairman Rogers swore in Kathy Balogh, 1777 W. Crystal Lane, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Ms. Balogh stated the sub-area plan called for working with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for more subsidized housing and low income ownership. She stated this was the biggest crime area in Mount Prospect and wanted to know any statistics on the Village's Crime Free Housing Program. Ms. O'Shea stated that she does not work directly with the Crime Free Housing Program, but she did know that around 98% of the landlords in the Village have become a part of the program. Ms. O'Shea wanted to clarify that when the Village stated they were working with HUD, they were spending money that was received from HUD in this area. The grant money was to set-up a strategic neighborhood revitalization area, so it could be spent on public improvements. Ms. O'Shea said the Village was not trying to attract any new section eight housing, this was not indicated anywhere in the sub-area plan. Ms. Balogh asked if the Village would be purchasing the United Airlines property. Chairman Rogers said that all that the Village would do would be to annex the area. The property would still be privately owned. Chairman Rogers swore in Eric Nelson, Business Owner at 1801 S. Busse Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Mr. Nelson stated that he would not have been able to open his business if it was located inside the corporate village limits of Mount Prospect. He choose unincorporated Cook County because of the zoning. He was worried that he would not be able to expand his business if it was in Mount Prospect in the future because of restrictive zoning. He was also concerned with the value of his property being reduced if it was incorporated and the Village limited the uses in the zoning district. Chairman Rogers said the buildings in the sub-area would stay as they are if they were annexed into the Village. Mr. Nelson understood that he would be grandfathered in under his current use. He further discussed the zoning issue along with increased costs for the proposed improvements. Chairman Rogers stated the Planning and Zoning Commission cannot dictate what goes in on every property. The Village and Planning and Zoning Commission always tries to work with business owners. Mr. Floros stated that annexation into Mount Prospect Richard Rogers, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 22, 2009 PZ-27-09 Page 4 of7 was normally performed because the property owner wanted to incorporate; he said the Village rarely forcibly annexes a property. Mr. Nelson stated that his issue was due to involuntary annexation to the Village. There was further general discussion on annexation. Chairman Rogers swore in Mike Nelson, Elk Grove Township Fire Chief, 1415 E. Algonquin Road, Arlington Heights, Illinois. Mr. Nelson wanted to clarify two issues for the record. He stated that the Village of Mount Prospect does not completely surround the United Airlines parcel. According to Elk Grove Township Fire Department records, there is a condo development to the north along Dempster that is still unincorporated along with parcels along Algonquin Road. Mr. Simmons confirmed that the Village does not completely surround the United Airlines parcel as a single parcel, but the land area where United is located including adjacent parcels as a whole is surrounded by the Village. Mr. Nelson asked if the Village forcibly annexed the east side of Busse Road, south of Moretti's to Interstate 90, in the early 1990s. Mr. Floros said that was a possibility. Mr. Nelson stated there was a court battle and the Village did forcibly annex these properties and made the property owners upgrade their fire alarms with computer lines. He said all of these properties went to court to disconnect, but the only businesses that did not were Moretti's and the gas station that was converted into a Laundromat. Mr. Floros stated there were property owners that did want to come into the Village. Mr. Nelson stated no, all the businesses were disconnected with the exception of the Citgo because a notification was never received, the Moretti's parking lot along Algonquin Road, and the adjacent parking lot. Ms. Roesti wanted clarification that if she sold her business in the future that did not conform to code in the long range plan, this would not affect the sale because the business was grandfathered in. Chairman Rogers said it depended on what the new business would want to change the use to. If they maintained the existing business, there would be no issues. If the change in use was drastic, there could be a problem. The new use would need to conform to the zoning in place at that time. Mr. Barken stated that when he moved to Mount Prospect in 1972, Ida Court was unincorporated. He could not recall the year his property was incorporated, but he was told everything that existed would be grandfathered in. He was concerned based on a previous experience that new annexed areas would have problems rebuilding. He provided an example of a garage that burned down across the street from his property. Mr. Barken said the owner had issues rebuilding due to current code requirements. Chairman Rogers stated that if there was a fire that significantly destroyed a structure, the new structure would have to conform to Village Code. This applied to all areas of the Village, including areas that have been annexed. Mr. Donnelly said property owners could also apply for a Variation. Chairman Rogers swore in Rick Anderson, 1106 E. Algonquin, Arlington Heights, Illinois. Mr. Anderson said that a certain part of his property lies in a flood plain. The original drawing showed his property as a detention pond. He wanted to know how his property and others that lie in the flood plain would be sold in the future. Mr. Simmons said the drawing was no longer in the plan as previous public comments were reviewed. If there were any new developments, there would be requirements for providing storm water detention. Mr. Simmons stated there are certain federal restrictions for development in a flood zone. There are options to regrade the property through the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD) or other departments that would handle storm water detention. Mr. Anderson asked if the V illage would condemn certain properties south of Algonquin Road, east of Busse for redevelopment in the future. Mr. Simmons said the South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan is a long range plan for what uses the Village would like to see in the area if redevelopment did happen. The Plan would advise a potential developer of uses in a particular area. Mr. Simmons said the Village was limited by the State of Illinois how it could utilize condemnation powers. Any sort of redevelopment in this area would likely be by private development. Richard Rogers, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 22, 2009 PZ-27-09 Page 5 of7 There was further general discussion on eminent domain and condemnation. Chairman Rogers swore in Ed Ruff, 521 N. Elm Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. He stated that he was representing JA Johnson Paving Company located in the South Mount Prospect Sub-area at 1025 E. Addison Ct., Arlington Heights, Illinois. Mr. Ruff stated all the O'Hare activity has the Village concerned and how it impacts the Village. He said the Village would like to have some control. Mr. Ruff asked if the STAR line would be north of Interstate 90 through the corridor. Chairman Rogers said there was a basic outline for the STAR line, but the exact location had not been determined. He believed there was a good chance a station would be in Mount Prospect. Chairman Rogers did state that the Village would like to have some control in the area with a positive approach so everyone would be happy. Mr. Ruff asked if there were any annexations for the sub-area. Chairman Rogers said the Village would like to annex the United property because the Village almost surrounds the entire parcel. Mr. Floros questioned if the STAR line was suppose to run down the middle of the Interstate. Mr. Simmons said Metra was also exploring potential locations north and south of the Interstate 90 right-of-way. The most likely scenario for the location of the STAR line would be down the center median of Interstate 90 to limit the impacts of properties within the corridor. Mr. Simmons stated the Village has a Comprehensive Plan already in place that looks at the Village as a whole. One of the directives of this plan was to look at properties that are not incorporated that surround the Village for potential annexation. Mr. Simmons said with the sub-area plan, there was more detail in this specific area to discuss annexation options. Going forward, any annexation would have to go through a more detailed plan analysis to determine whether or not properties would be viable to come into the community. Mr. Simmons stated the United property would come into the Village via voluntary annexation due to its size. Chairman Rogers swore in Mark Jensen, 1690 Imperial Court, Arlington Heights, Illinois. Mr. Jensen stated his company has been at this location since 1968. He said his company has been happy with emergency services in the area, but there are several issues and concerns with the street that is in disrepair. Mr. Jensen said he was glad the Village was looking at the sub-area for improvements. Chairman Rogers swore in Timothy Stef, 2231 E. Oakton, Arlington Heights, Illinois. Mr. Stef was asking Staff or the Planning and Zoning Commission to clarify what surrounding area meant in the sub-area report. Chairman Rogers stated that the surrounding area was within driving or walking distance of Mount Prospect. Mr. Stef referenced page 8 of the sub-area plan that stated that annexation would be voluntarily or forced if the land is wholly surrounded less than 60 acres. Ms. O'Shea clarified that this sentence in the report was educational to set- up the legal parameters of annexation. It may be forced or it may be voluntary, if it's going to be forced the legal requirements were explained. This was just to introduce the topic of annexation. Ms. 0' Shea said the report does discuss annexation further that references the Village's cost and the needs of the business. Mr. Roberts asked if the word wholly meant complete, one-hundred (100) percent surrounding. Ms. O'Shea stated that this was correct, completely surrounded. Mr. Stef asked about improvements and safety to the sub-area. Chairman Rogers stated the plan was suppose to make Mount Prospect a better community. There was further general discussion regarding improvements. Mr. Roberts asked Mr. Stef to clarify what he meant by Algonquin and Dempster east of Busse Road being bad. Mr. Stef said the streets were bad. Mr. Roberts stated the Village does not maintain Dempster and he agreed that it is in terrible condition. Mr. Stef stated that he was concerned with the police always being in the area. There was further discussion regarding police and fire activity in the area. Richard Rogers, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 22, 2009 PZ-27-09 Page 6 of7 Chairman Rogers asked if anyone else in the audience would like to speak on the sub-area plan, hearing none, he closed the public portion at 8:53 p.m. and brought the discussion back to the commission. Mr. Foggy asked if the sub-area plan was being developed to create a land use map around the STAR line, or if it was being created regardless if the STAR line moved forward. Ms. O'Shea stated that the plan was being produced originally due to the businesses at Algonquin, Busse, and Dempster per the directives of the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The Village was already working in the area to improve its general safety. The report expanded beyond the Algonquin, Busse, and Dempster intersection as many of the proposed recommendations applied to the entire sub-area and not specifically to this corner. Ms. O'Shea stated there are a lot of great things coming into the area over the next ten to fifteen years (10-15) and the Village wanted to have a unified vision for the area. The plan would still be appropriate even if the STAR line does not become a reality. Mr. Foggy said the real purpose of the plan was not to take land, but the Village was trying to control the growth and limit mistakes other municipalities may have made by not having a long range plan in place. Mr. Donnelly made a motion to approve a recommendation to the Village Board to amend the Official Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Mount Prospect to include the South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan. Mr. Floros seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Donnelly, Floros, Foggy, Roberts, Rogers NAYS: None Motion was approved 5-0. Mr. Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Mr. Roberts, to adjourn at 8:57 p.m. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. !{~ Ryan Kast, Community Development Administrative Assistant Richard Rogers, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 22, 2009 PZ-27-09 Page 7 of7 . Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON [fn[bJ~ (Q;(Q)~'\\1l VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT CLARE L. O'SHEA, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER OCTOBER 15,2009 HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 22, 2009 SUBJECT: PZ-27-09 - SOUTH MOUNT PROPSECT SUB-AREA PLAN N A LEGEND _ Sub-area Boundary (Average Daily Traffic) o 0.15 03 06 ,Miles PZ-27-09 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting October 22,2009 Page 2 BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the October 22, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by the Village of Mount Prospect (the "Petitioner") regarding a proposed amendment to the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the October 7, 2009 edition of the Journal & Topics Newspaper. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Since the adoption of the 2007 Comprehensive Plan, staff has been working to initiate strategies from the plan's Implementation Program. One of the strategies listed in the Comprehensive Plan is to create a strategic plan for the Algonquin Road, Busse Road, and Dempster Street intersection. As staff began the data collection and conducting interviews with stakeholders, many of the issues discussed applied to the South Mount Prospect area in general and the recommendations developed were appropriate for several corridors; therefore, the plan encompasses a larger boundary creating the South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan. The Sub-area Plan is a more specific guide for future development. Long range planning is critical for land use consistency and planned development as South Mount Prospect is affected by large regional transportation projects, such as the O'Hare Modernization Program, Elgin-O'Hare Western access improvements and the Suburban Transit Access Route (STAR) Line. Improvements to South Mount Prospect, such as completing the sidewalk system and installing pedestrian traffic signals, are currently underway, but the Sub-area Plan creates a comprehensive approach to development and public improvements. The South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan consists of an existing conditions report, recommendations, goals/objectives, and an implementation program. Research for the existing conditions report included data gathering, field observations, and interviews. As part of the Recommendations Section, the sub-area plan examines three areas in detail: the industrial area bounded by Busse Road, Oakton Street, and Algonquin Road, the commercial center at Algonquin Road, Busse Road, and Dempster Street, and the United Airlines headquarters property. These areas may present redevelopment opportunities or are ready for enhancements from expected development. A summary of the recommendations are: · Corridor Improvements o Safe and efficient transportation system for motorized and non-motorized traffic · Aesthetic Improvements o Improvements for lighting, landscaping, pedestrian amenities · Improving the appearance of property and the safety in the neighborhood o Invest and re-invest in residential, commercial, and industrial areas o Create better buffers between uses and improve the connectivity of the area · Increase marketing of the area to communicate the advantages of the location and its proximity to the Interstate Highway system, O'Hare International Airport, and alternative transportation Staff worked to create consistency between the South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan and the Comprehensive Plan for the Goals Section, which are broken down by Residential, Economic Development (commercial and industrial) and Community Facilities/ Services/Open Space. The strategies to reach the goals are actionable tasks and are specific to South Mount Prospect. The Implementation Program contains strategies, responsible parties, and timeframe for each action. In May, staff presented the draft plan to the Village Board and received direction to gather additional public input through open houses to discuss the plan. In June and September, Staff held open houses and sought public input from property owners, businesses, and residents about the area. Comments from the open houses are attached and staff worked with the public to reach a consensus on issues. Adopting specific directives which address the characteristics of the South Mount Prospect Area will provide the development community with a clear vision of the type of development and redevelopment that the Village will PZ-27-09 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting October 22, 2009 Page 3 support for the area. Communicating these policies to the development community prior to formal submission of a plan to the Village will allow developers and property owners to better evaluate development opportunities for the area and develop initial plans that are consistent with the Village's vision. "Up front" information will result in high quality development within the South Mount Prospect Sub-area. RECOMMENDA nON Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the Village Board to amend the Official Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Mount Prospect to include the South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan. I concur: rJ ' Community Development Attachments: Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan (October 2009) Summary of comments received from the public Notes from open house meetings: June 24, 2009 and September 16,2009 South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan Public Comment Email: We have lived in the Lake Briarwood community for 11 years and watched the surrounding areas change. With the speed limit on Algonquin 45 mph, it is dangerous when people dart out between cars, no regard for the stoplights or crossing at an intersection. I am not sure what the answer is, but many of us have gotten into near miss or had accidents. Folks from the apartments are trying to get to the strip mall. It would be great to see better stores in the surrounding area and limit the number of Labor Temp agencies. It breeds loitering and threatening behavior and I won't go there. Friday and Saturday nights after the tenants have had a few beers becomes unsafe. Going condo on the Briarwood street off Algonquin has not helped the situation since it is not monitored with how many people live in each one. Would love to see them torn down and a park put in. Email: I read thru the plan and want to compliment the village and you on the well researched and easily understood plan. I am very excited about the plan to implement the STAR system. Public transit is so important to any area but especially in a diverse housing area as south Mt. Prospect. I am concerned about the plan for housing around our area. I live in the Dearborn Court duplexes. We consistently have problems with the apartments to our east. They are constantly knocking down our fence, making noise to all hours and we have had rat problems. I know there are standards and I am sure the Village enforces them but it would be great to see more done to clean up these areas. Since the apartments across the street in Arlington Heights went condo the noise level and problems seemed to have lessened. Are there any plans for condo conversions in this area? Email: I'd like to voice my concern as a business owner whose business is on the "Oakton Corridor" in your Sub-Area Plan. In recent years I have had to hire a law firm to represent my interest when Des Plaines wanted to annex our area. Most recently I was very concerned with lOOTs plan for access to the O'Hare airport - which I was very happy when the most destructive (to businesses) plan for roadways was taken off the planning table. Now I'm reading about Mt. Prospects plan. My business is at 2355 E. Oakton (across the street from West Shore Pipe Line, in Mt. Prospect). Your planners vision does not include my business (a printing business), but rather where my business stands, a parking lot would be. I read the South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan and I wasn't sure of the order of the "plan". First I imagine Mt. Prospect would annex the land. With annexation, does that mean that we would have Village water? Would then the Village buy the property? Would the Village pay to move my business to another location? Or, would we be able to operate as normal. My concerns are multi-fold - 1) my parents own the property/building. If zoning restrictions are placed on the property, it would severely impact the value of the land to others. 2) as a business owner - what would be paid for to move our business? I just completed a renovation of our interior space to fit our businesses needs - so I'm not looking to undertake a move - our build out requirements are expensive. Also, I'm wondering why the Village chose not to officially notify us as to this plan which would affect our business's life? I found out thru the local business owners "grapevine". In this economy, where all are feeling the effects of "the great recession", I wonder where is all of the money going to come from? Your answers to my questions will be greatly appreciated. Email: I own an entertainment lighting company located at 2461 East Oakton in unincorporated Cook County. Presently we are tied to Arlington Heights with a zip code of 60005. Our fire service comes from Elk Grove Village. I received a letter regarding the South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan, and looked at the website. I noticed that Oakton Street was mentioned several times, although I could not see a detailed enough map to figure out what areas were and were not part of the scope of your plan....Or, what areas Mount Prospect is pursing for annexation, if any. I'm interested in any information that may pertain to my location that involves your plans. I despise having to deal directly with Cook County for services and permits, etc. Phone calls: . Crystal Towers Turning left onto Busse Road is very difficult. There are many potholes in the streets east of Busse Road. Left hand turn onto Busse Road is nearly impossible at rush hour, but there are problems all day long. There are 300 units in the development so this is a concern for many people. What is the status with the development at Busse and Dempster? Old cars at D'Augustino's are not attractive and should be cleaned up. Likes the business park idea for the area east of Busse Would like to have fewer Laundromats Would like to see more landscaping and better property maintenance Would like to have a bank in the area near Busse and Algonquin . Ida Court Dempster has pot holes. Would have liked to see residential use at the Briarwood Business Center instead of industrial use. Would like more open space in the area. If United leaves, he would like to see open space and services for local residents (retail, etc.). · Algonquin Road Is the project funded? Will properties be annexed and condemned? We should explain that the plan is for the next 10-15 years. Village of Mount Prospect South Mount Prospect Open House Meeting Notes June 24, 2009 Staff opened the meeting with a presentation to the public describing the development of the plan, research, and purpose of the South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan. Goals and objectives for the area have been developed and recommendations for improvements are proposed. The discussion was open to the open house attendees and the following is a summary of the comments/concerns: · Elk Grove Township Highway Commissioner, Chuck Surchuk, had questions about access to the plan and communication. He wasn't notified about the plan and felt the unincorporated area of town was left out of the planning process. Staff explained that the purpose of today's meeting is to gather input from the group. o Some property owners south of Oakton did not receive letters. Staff apologized for the error and is planning to hold another meeting for the area south of Oakton Street. · Was the plan focus looked at from a financial tax-revenue standpoint? o The plan is a general view of the area that takes into account the large transportation projects that will affect the growth in Mount Prospect. The purpose is to coordinate development to ensure the highest services for the community. . How much does historical research play into the plan? oDes Plaines attempt to annex the area recently o Some areas were annexed in the 1980s . How will the improvements be funded? o The improvements will be funded over the next 10-15 years and the village will seek grants for additional improvements. . Comment about a need of a traffic light at the Recplex entrance on Dempster o dangerous for kids at parks . What land uses will be implemented if United does leave? o The plan calls for office, retail, and an open space component . Is there a comparable example to what might replace United? o Kensington Business Park is an attractive office park with open space and retail to support the businesses. . How was Oakton corridor added into the plan? o The Village of Mount Prospect is concurrently developing a transportation plan and the area south of Oakton was addressed because of its proximity to the proposed STAR line station. . What reSidents/businesses has Mount Prospect reached out to? o The Village of Mount Prospect reached out to businesses near Algonquin, Busse, and Dempster at several business meetings, mOT, surrounding municipalities, village departments, etc. . Will condemnation take place? o That is not part of this plan. . Who is going to buy property when land may be annexed? o The Village of Mount Prospect is not planning on purchasing the property. Most improvements to private property will be developed by the private sector. . Comment about area safety: o Need better streetlights on Dempster Village of Mount Prospect South Mount Prospect Open House Meeting Notes June 24, 2009 o Connect the sidewalks o Acknowledged that there is a gang presence · MP resident was happy that improvements were being proposed for the area · Where and what kind of cultural events will be held in this area? o Resident feels that traffic is an issue and an event might bring more traffic. · What is the timeframe for the Elmhurst Road interchange? o Within 10 years · When would "movement" into the area happen? When would the plan happen? o The plan is underway because the Village of Mount Prospect is working with the community to make the neighborhood more attractive and safer. The Village of Mount Prospect currently promotes the area to brokers looking for available properties and several village departments work with property owners to improve the appearance and safety of their properties. · General concern with future developments that might affect businesses. Village of Mount Prospect South Mount Prospect Open House Meeting Notes September 16, 2009 Staff presented the South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan to meeting attendees. The background, plan development, and recommendations were discussed and a discussion question opened the initial discussion. . Why live or work in South Mount Prospect? o Most of the attendees represented businesses in the area and almost all stated that the proximity to O'Hare International Airport was the biggest attraction for their location. . What does the O'Hare expansion have to do with SMP? o A meeting attendee asked why the O'Hare expansion and improvements were discussed in the report. Staff mentioned that the airport is important to businesses and residents in the area and its expansion will affect how attractive the land is for future and existing businesses and residents. Mount Prospect's proximity to the airport is a competitive advantage for businesses that ship or travel nationally or internationally. . Why are the timelines different between the comp plan and SMP sub-area plan? o Attendees questioned why short-term and long-term were defined differently in the 2007 Comprehensive Plan and the draft sub-area plan. Staff stated that the Comprehensive Plan gives the direction for a more in-depth analysis of activities and studies. . Meeting attendees raised concern that the south Oakton area did not reflect land uses of some of the businesses (warehousing and light industrial) to make the area consistent with 2007 Comprehensive Plan. o Staff agreed to revise the exhibit to show a mix of uses in the Oakton Corridor. Based on the comments, staff stated that the report would be reviewed, but there wasn't a need for another open house. The meeting attendees will be notified about the public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO INCLUDE THE SOUTH MOUNT PROSPECT SUB-AREA PLAN WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect did adopt the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect on June 5, 2007, pursuant to Ordinance No. 5631; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that a need exists to amend the Official Comprehensive Plan of 2007; and WHEREAS, pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/11-12-7, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect held a Public Hearing on October 22, 2009 pursuant to legal notice being published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on October 7, 2009, to consider the proposed amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have considered the proposed amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan of 2007 and have determined that the best interests of the Village would be served by amending the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect and include the South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan dated October 2009. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby amend the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect and include the South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan, dated October 2009 as part of the Appendix of the Official Comprehensive Plan, a copy of said South Mount Prospect Sub- Area Plan is attached as Exhibit "A" and hereby made a part this ordinance. SECTION TWO: The Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby authorized and directed to file notice of the amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, as provided by the Statutes of the State of Illinois. SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby directed to publish in pamphlet form, said South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan, dated October 22, 2009, as an amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Mount Prospect, pursuant to the Statutes of the State of Illinois made and provided. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. c, Comp Plan - South MP Sub-area Plan Page 2 of 2 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of November, 2009. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\WIN\ORDINANCE2\AMENDCOMP PLAN 2007NOV2009.doc C/) c IT \ ~ ~ o ~ o/) . . SeUTH MeUNT PReSPECT . . . . . DRAFT PLAN: OCTOBER 2009 PREPARED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 www.mountprospect.org TABLE OF CONTENTS & LIST OF FIGURES Preface ............. .................. ............. ..... ..... ......... .............................. 1 Bee kgrou nd and History..... ........ ..... ..................... ........ ..... .............2 Existing Conditions.......... ........... ............................ ...... ............ .......3 Recommendations ....... ........ ..... ... ............. ................ ................... 13 Goals and Objectives.... ... ..... ... ........ .................... ........................ 1 7 Implementation Program ............................................................. 18 FIGURES Figure 1: Metra's Proposed STAR Line............................................ 1 Figure 2: Wafermain Map............. .......................................... ........4 Figure 3: Storm Sewer Map.............................................................4 Figure 4: Sanitary Sewer Map ........................................................4 Figure 5: Sub-area Boundary Map ................................................ 6 Figure 6: Existing Bus Routes Map.................................................. 7 Figure 7: Official Zoning Map ......................................................... 9 Figure 8: Station Area Plan ........................................................... 11 PREFACE The South Mount Prospect sub-area plan was developed based on the direction from the Village of Mount Prospect's Comprehensive Plan, which lists a strategy to II develop a strategic plan for the Dempster, Algonquin, and South Busse Road intersection to enhance this commercial corridor. Strategies for better pedestrian circulation should be a high priority." As an element to the Village's Comprehensive plan, sub-area and corridor plans provide a more localized focus on both existing conditions and vision for future development over the next 10- 15 years on the areas they encompass. Several factors contributing to the growth in South Mount Prospect are the O'Hare International Airport's Modernization Project, 1-90 Interchange improvements at Elmhurst Road, and Metra's proposed STAR rail line. O'Hare International Airport is renovating and expanding to keep up with global transportation demands. The O'Hare Modernization Program includes the construction and reconfiguration of runways, taxiways, terminals, parking facilities, and passenger transportation services (Public Act 93-0450 of the 93rd General Assembly). With the O'Hare O'Hare Intemational Airport Modernization Program, a new western access and terminal are proposed to increase the region's accessibility to the airport. The proposed upgrade to a full interchange at Elmhurst Road and 1-90 will also enhance South Mount Prospect's accessibility to and from O'Hare Airport and the interstate system. South Mount Prospect is positioned as an attractive place for new and existing businesses which may utilize the new western access. ~ w.m....... """'.. .- - Na_ - South Mount Prospect has been identified as a station location for Metra's proposed Suburban Transit Access Route (STAR) line. The STAR line is a 55-mile rail corridor that would connect O'Hare International Airport to 19 suburban stops including, Des Plaines, Mount Prospect, Schaumburg, Naperville, and terminating in Joliet. Metra is still investigating the project and is working toward completion of the alternatives analysis (www.metraconnects.com). Following the completion of this study, and approval of federal funding for the project, Metra has estimated that trains could be running on the STAR line system within ten years. In anticipation of the STAR line, the Village of Mount Prospect recently completed a Public Transportation Study, which provides guidance for future development and recommends a multimodal transportation hub at the proposed station site. Figure 1 Metra's Proposed Star Line Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 1 Businesses, community leaders, Village staff, neighboring municipalities, and other governmental entities were interviewed to gain insight and understanding on problems, issues, and strengths of the South Mount Prospect area. During the public input phase, the Village solicited feedback from the entire sub-area through mailings and open houses. Information for the sub-area plan was gathered from the u.s. Soil Survey, u.s. Census, IDOT, RTA, site observations and Village studies and planning documents. When the sub-area plan is adopted, the South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan will become part of the Village of Mount Prospect Comprehensive Plan and will serve as a guide for future improvements in the area. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY Transportation shaped development trends and patterns in Mount Prospect. Just as the Chicago Northwest rail line helped establish Mount Prospect in the 1850s, O'Hare International Airport and the 1-90 improvements played a significant role in the development of South Mount Prospect. According to interviews with several stakeholders, multi-family housing in South Mount Prospect was constructed for the airline industry employees due to its proximity to the airport. Most of the multi- family housing in South Mount Prospect was developed in the 1960s and 1970s under county regulations. The properties were later annexed into the Village in the 1970s and 1980s. The majority of the commercial and industrial developments in the area occurred from the 1960s to the 1980s. The demographic profile in Mount Prospect has also changed over time. Originally, Mount Prospect was settled by German immigrants in the 1830s. Since its incorporation, Mount Prospect has attracted many different residents from different backgrounds. The same trend is seen in South Mount Prospect. In 1990, only one census tract was considered a "port of entry" - an area receiving large numbers of new foreign born residents - and it was located in North Mount Prospect. According to the 2000 Census, a total of four census tracts in the Village were identified as ports of entry; three of which are located in South Mount Prospect. Page 2 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS SOIL Soils in the sub-area accommodate growth or have been altered to accommodate growth as evidenced by the few parcels of vacanti undeveloped land. Soil properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection of the site, the design of the structure, construction, performance after construction, and maintenance. According to the U.S Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Web Soil Survey (2008),80.8 % of sub-area is 805B orthents, which is moderately well drained soil suitable for development. The remaining 20% of soils are smaller percentages of Ashkum, Beecher, and Markham, all of which are developable soils, but may not drain as well as other soils. As with any development, an engineer should be consulted as part of a developer's due diligence process to ensure the soils of a particular property can accommodate any future development. UTI L1TI ES For the purposes of this report, Mount Prospect's utility system includes water, storm, and sanitary sewers. Water is supplied by the Village of Mount Prospect (through the Northwest Suburban Joint Action Water Agency OAWA)) and Illinois American Water Company (IAWC). The sub-area currently has water main infrastructure in place to serve properties in South Mount Prospect, with the exception of an unincorporated area on Dempster Road between Ida Court and the Alpine Apartments complex. The storm and sanitary systems are sufficient for current needs. The Village should evaluate the need for expansion or upgrading the systems when presented with proposals for future development, redevelopment, or annexation. United Plaza Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 3 UTILITY SYTSTEM MAPS A Legend - W\TERMAIN 0.125 025 Figure 2 Watermain Map A o 0.125 0.25 Figure 3 Storm Sewer Map A o 0.125 025 Figure 4 Sanitary Sewer Map Page 4 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan TRANSPORTATION The South Mount Prospect sub-area is traversed by several arterial roadways that have high daily traffic volumes. The Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) reports the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on state roads and the numbers are used by retailers or developers. South Mount Prospect has some of the highest ADT numbers in the Village as detailed below: · Algonquin Road - 34,200 · Busse Road - 28,800 · Dempster Street - 10,500 · Elmhurst Road - 28,900 · Gakton Street - 26,500 The above roadways are not controlled by the Village. IDOT has jurisdiction over Algonquin Road (IL Route 62), Busse Road, Elmhurst Road (IL Route 83), and Oakton Street (IL Route 83). Dempster Road is under Cook County's jurisdiction. IDOT has designated both Elmhurst Road and Algonquin Road as Strategic Regional Arterials (SRA). This designation indicates a policy by IDOT to make signal and roadway improvements that provide for the efficient flow of traffic both entering and traveling along the roadway. In general, IDOT plans to minimize new curb cuts and traffic signals along SRA routes to encourage more efficient traffic flow. As new development occurs along these roadways, the Village should ensure access to properties is consistent with these plans. Additionally, IDOT plans to expand the interchange at Elmhurst Road into a full interchange with exit and entrance ramps to both west and east bound traffic on 1-90. In 2008, the Regional Transportation Authority (RT A) funded a public transportation study to examine how well the Village is served by public transportation. One of the highest priorities of the study was to improve the connectivity of South Mount Prospect to the rest of the Village. Currently four bus routes serve South Mount Prospect routes 230, 606, 226, and 223. These routes connect South Mount Prospect to Elk Grove Village, Des Plaines, and Arlington Heights. However, the area is missing a north-south connection which would connect the sub-area to services in downtown Mount Prospect and Randhurst. The study recommends re-routing the existing 234 bus route from downtown and extending it to South Mount Prospect. This extension would connect the sub-area with the rest of the Village through several other bus routes. Once the STAR line station is developed, the station could become a transportation hub for both bus and train service. Intersection of Busse Road and Dempster Street Pace Bus Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 5 B rTffiffiTlIllllllll ; ~ [JJ]J]I . c::J GTr1 t i:: :fit ,n:m- lEIIIIBHHHffi1 ~ ~~- !I::m:m::IInrnI'A I:;: r /]]1f ffiH~' ~~~~ -~ ~ .. ...........'" tun-. 0= I nC,.a.rr..... ~ ~ .H~~~ :~ ~ --~!~ ~~~ ,"~ ~ f - ~~ ~," ..:M.tl tbol~ ..J ~ ~ ~. ": =1l - ~--~G. ~~~ J~ff:~ L - ~I \ \~ "' \. ~ QaJij, Of! ... " 1\ ~ n '" \" I-- "~ ~- ..... It II 1-1 = ~D - ~ ~ N A ICD 9_ \r- I I' I::;;;;;I!! ..) I} ~~ ~ ~ --:;: ). ~ IP\" , .:: =--0 ~ HI II J. ~ ..... -~, c j;~ I:: t; - ...-, .-..... ~ ,!:: ~ '" 111111 -' OOffiE I- (10500) ." ~ r:~ ~ ij ~d! ~r H ~ V-~. ~ ; ~It - - I i-rr - I-- ,.....~ ~I-- i- C- F w ~ f-f .....-- r .......1:1 l~n '1" ---3 =IC:'" i ~ ~.- i ~ Ii I J LEGEND _ Sib-area B a.mda')' (Average Dally Tram ~ ) %6,5()OJ- ~ t F ~..+ o 0.15 Figure 5 Sub-Area Boundary Map 0.3 0.6 IMiles Page 6 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan ,.-*-- : ~1 : i ~, ,......- ~"~'. ; "; i ,L.-" - ...'~ .... '\ ; . . 1 . .' "--'-11'\ ~ . .",. ..o.nT PIton KLUlKNTAJn' '~I .,.~., ~ ~~ I ,"" ~ ~" 1 . II '-+ 'i- "'"' I ~ 1~:1 i: TI~ ~ 11 .... L - -'-'1' ~. _iT" OK'" .~: l;i . . _. . ;., r ~._.. ." ~,~ l.;., :'.,.~ --.- 1,,; "I t, ::t .~ -S";.l;AY.~ND,CATHOLIC~ , :IJnfOlIl,' J . !!!L ~ . . ~I' ~ .r--:--';-.~-~'~-~-- ~"&:U'C'O{N~"UHtO.'HICi"--':~- 234 '~.:~" ~!I' II ,"'1'4.. - ~ "'::'. t J' .~... -: ~ : ~ J t~". I r. '. Q. . 11 ..;" 3::: '"'!! III .... .. .' .. ~ " z ., 0 ~ . :r ~ III 'CoIn,,_ it i ~. en III .. < n III !' ~" '_1> . ~ ~ .,d,.. ''& ..." l~.. j" "'" 'o"s;r,v~ '.~~AItV -'1 ~I : ~..., .,' .,+ _.-. - - ,~~ ~ -, .- , ' ;tt~.._. "UN.~. ~~" "!!'.. il,1 ~ -"t1.,;i '_,. ~ : '..11 . ~~.'- .$'- -.. _. . .... . .",. ilIii LION' 'AIKILlIllNTAIl'l; ; - :. 4- i.l.t J' Cumbertand ,L{ '~ 11!'-':! ~ . ~: II !'. "' _L.,. 208 f II -.. ~ 1/ ......., ~l l' ~ ~ ~ i~ .-i H ~, , , "T.!-"::" r[',-. -t;:;.. ~; h,'ll ?" ,ill ''- -'" -+- ... T..... _.1 I ~'~ .ol.[ II ,..,. ~' ~~..lI -~ -411. '" ~ . CI.J. _ ~ ._ '-Ill .-i ~~ 1. ~I ;"-" .~ ltl +.ii. ~. rn ':=i II ., i ~I ~ .......1' II ~ lrc;.. ~d ~ ~-:; -11 .~AI.r--"'';:'' ~~n' -- & 226 ..~ Leaend D Mount Prospect . schools E:IJ Metra Station D Major Employment Areas Parks ~ ;. ~ d+'- .. .~ o 0.25 '/ 0.5 :ij MileS: 1 t. .....- ,; ~. Source: Pa Figure 6 Existing Pace Bus Routes Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 7 ANNEXATION Annexation is the incorporation of a property into a legal entity. Annexation may be voluntary or forced if the land is wholly surrounded and less than 60 acres. A benefit of annexation is the consistent service delivery to incorporated properties. South Mount Prospect is contiguous to several unincorporated areas: · United Property (north west comer of Algonquin Road and Lin- neman Road) · East side of Busse Road and South side of Algonquin Road · Oakton Street Corridor There are both advantages and disadvantages to the Village and the properties involved with annexation. The Village of Mount Prospect is interested in annexation to provide cohesive service delivery and to ensure life safety both in the construction and maintenance of existing and new buildings. Annexation of the properties is essential for district improvements, such as consistent streetscape improvements and completing the sidewalk network. Annexation would also provide the Village with regulatory control over future land uses on properties in these areas. Prior to considering the annexation of any properties, a detailed annexation study should be performed to understand the impacts of annexation on the Village and property owners. The Village of Mount Prospect must assess the costs associated with providing additional services, infrastructure improvements, and other related expenses. The annexation study will provide the information needed by the Village to determine the feasibility of annexation. The South Mount Prospect Sub-area Plan provides direction on future land uses that would be appropriate should unincorporated parcels be annexed into Mount Prospect. With the sub-area plan, the Village of Mount Prospect is not proposing to forcibly annex properties in the near future, but will continue to assess the viability of the area through annexation studies and cost benefit analyses. Should property owners approach the Village to voluntarily annex, the Village will review the requests on a case-by-case basis. South Busse Road Page 8 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan N A o 0.125 0..25 Zoning Di51ricts r:::;w B1 0 nee _ B2 Neigl1::1arhaDd Sh~ng _ B3CanmeraElISh~1l;I _ 64 Can mllll'liel Corritb- _ B5 Certra ComrnCldCII D ~ CerhlCanmen::i!ll C~I!! _ CR COnser'l91bn Rec:re&tIO"l _ 11 Linifl!d Irxh..rdrilll _ 12 RaIFOij~ _ CR 0110& Rsf*td.. Figure 7 Zoning Map 0.5 . Miles _ PI O'SIrcelPcrllllil D R1 Sh;:Ile-tamlt,' ReaLief1lal _ R2 .llhct-ed Si~I!!-iIlrniy _ R3 L(t(JIden&ty Reslder1lal _ R4 t.1Liti-1!ulli~De'Ol!lopml!!rt _ R!; Se....~ CiIi~n Re5ir:1enoe D RASlrlie-tlmll'r'RaSCIEIl11IiilI D RX Slrg e.f5niy R:esi:lertilll _ )Ql UrirwJlllr6ted COOk Coll'l1v Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 9 ZONING Zoning is a land use and site control mechanism utilized by governmental agencies to minimize conflicts between land uses. A couple of properties in South Mount Prospect do not have consistency between their existing land uses when compared to the Village's long range land use plan or the current underlying zoning district. Future development or redevelopment must comply with both the zoning requirements and long range land use policies of the Village. The most restrictive zoning is applied to newly annexed parcels. As discussed in the Background and History section, South Mount Prospect was developed before it was annexed into the Village. Colonial Greens, Timberlake Apartments and Algonquin Trails Apartments are zoned RX Single Family Residential. These properties were built under county regulations and annexed into the Village without rezoning the property. A zoning district of R4 Multi-Family Development designation would be a more appropriate designation for these properties. The southeast corner of the intersection of Algonquin and Busse Roads has three properties that do not have land uses consistent with their underlying zoning. These include an office building ComEdRight-of-Way at 1601 W. Algonquin, a restaurant at 1799 S. Busse, and a gas West of Busse Road station at 1651 W. Algonquin. All three are zoned R-X Single Family. These properties are designated as neighborhood commercial in the Village's land use plan and future service oriented uses (restaurants, retail, etc.) should be encouraged on these properties should they ever redevelop. A B-3 Commercial Shopping District would be an appropriate designation for the 1601 W. Algonquin and 1799 S. Busse properties, while a B-4 Commercial Corridor District would be suitable for 1651 W. Algonquin. The Com-Ed right-of-way which transverses the sub-area is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. To encourage more passive use of this area by residents a C-R Conservation Recreation District would be more appropriate and the development of recreational features such as walking paths and seating areas should be encouraged in the future. Page 10 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan ,~~ f; . ',- .A. r' 1 l" f'\ I F I,. .r.:.' "'~." ": ..,,~ '-.. ~.. ,'i5.;.~;.~'1s~ I~" -Qi'r~ 'i- ~ ,-p ... r....~ ..... 'j c.'~i r~}~i~:~ ..;_:~. '-, ~ ~~'; \~ ';'.'3;/(~.~': r~rf!j~ ~<r.'s ~" ':\'. . ~ t - . ~_ I". <~ .,.,.,~ ,p ~..~ j'. .. I r- ~-. l~J.,t~ .. _. r- ...: ~_--: "",'.. "/If!'!: t~2.., 1..i~;-:~CWt. ...."'!lEt' ~<- ~... r ' , ,f.f: .r. ~.:t'". '.,. ~ .. I~ t/i: -, - . , .', 'Ii" J\J~,.,.\"r-.r-.~ . ," r' # . crt . ~i:-' :-,.., rr ff.. n 1 It- !:w .. .r I . . , J- , . ). \. . I.. . " ~ r ":~ ~-=- .. I .., -. .r- .. /-.9 'fl" \ \>" I _ 0 ,# 1[;. ~... ~ '. ',.f #' /'~ · ---r;- .,,{.. ~~f" . '11 1111- . .'1' / ' III,~ '; r.. · J . / ~.~ .. ...J> ,.., ..J.. i , ~' c _ '. . ..' J .1- '] -r' ~io..~~~'"""$f,, ...l, I '""- "~'-~~i' +~ r..________.--t of ~ J ~ r- tr ." 1 ~--.~ ~. ;;4 I. ~-~ rrr:-Tr'T If' rT r-' -. - -.- .r" ~ SUB AREA A: TRANSIT CENTER STATION OFFICE RETAIL SUB AREA B: BUSINESS PARK BUSINESS PARK OFFICE RET AI L SUB AREA C: OAKTON FRONTAGE OFFICE/WAREHOUSE HOTEL RETAIL .':I[}. i.~.tp . -1 ' 'f. ",:, ".t . ""ft.I,,'"'' ; r- j ON '~~~i!:~ ~ ~. I · .f~~....~. ',,' -T > '. ~ "~-~.,. ....<t t, ; -;- ~ :7 if -~;;7' - 1!/ :17:;: r;~ ~. n . - :.;~-.r,. :;c:,-:' n.;..~:.,~ ~.,.'. -','C ~i~:r SITE DATA _ CONCEPT PLAN ~ ~~-- ~~..~"?,:i j" 'i':r ~ J ' '..-..~ l'_~~.'ti; l I~~:!.'i"_(i; ~ ""'_"~- ,. " , -' ". ~ l r' 1, ','~r,t ";-~~",,,,~,,(~.{\:'. . 'r'r; d .- J' ,I ,1 'o.!' t.S;;,I'I" ~cr'.-" ",' 1.( ~~v .;{ ~,..r ......~ ..::r - 1':,; .,\~. .,"T ,~- ....' .t~. _','-" ~~.: 'r'i.:~~ ,.~..1~ ~~ ,." ;.~ ". . ..----:-.- t.~r'lr {":'-.!"!'. '.' ~'r ".I ~l l"'J~ - - - . ~. ~. utlU1Y p,SUAtM1 , '0'0- . -:.-.~'~ 1 ' ~f') :r,.r..,' T .,....- J~'" .,....1 ," } '\:';':':r ." ~!.J: r-- ..- ....:-.' -.., .... DEMPSTER 5rREH ... I' Co t r- I'. ...,.. r~ 'I t ~1 .j .. .. \' ~ , , , , r :'.,' '-. " . I ,. -r I "' I I. r ,. ~ , r r . r! . ,. ". ,. ~ .,.. r ,.. ,.. r , , r r , ( rJ ,. r ,. rJ r r ,. ,. ,. r . , " . It . , , ~~i.~.}~;C~~~~:; .'- ~'l...,. w - ~- 't: ,~~ :-- ~ ~ - -~7 .~'" ~~ ..0.'.0....'" , _. OAK-rON STREET .. .r-....~ ;. -- 11 !r, ~" ; ,.., / c; ......I. ___ _ Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Transit-Oriented Development Planning Station Area Plan Figure 8 Station Area Plan Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan ... - ;J I DEVELOPMENT REOUIRED POTENTIAL PARKING TBO TBO 60,000 SO.FT. 240 SPACES 10.000 so. FT. 40 SPACES 690,000 sa. FT. 1,340 SPACES 90.000 sa.FT. 360 SPACES 6,000 sa. FT. 24 SPACES 510,000 SO. FT. 90.000 sa.FT. 5.000 SO.FT. 2,040 SPACES '70 SPACES 20 SPACES .--. r--. ... ... '-' --'- . .r:t J'V J. .- --':.i:.~" 't,.,. ,'r~" , r ~ , '. r-- ~.l\ "'- r. ,J ., ..... ,-,-J" -" . ... ~. t r., . I -. t f~~{ .--- I I r ....- ,... - -' - , Jr'- J ';..~ I ,..... - ,r- ..... ! '.. ,0" J " " "-'.-0:- ....~. ",,,> ~. --'--.-..Jl @ LA~_IIC "-":--:::' July 2009 Page 11 Industrial Uses on South Busse Road The unincorporated areas in the sub-area boundaries are not zoned by the Village, but the Comprehensive Plan provides land use direction for areas within 1.5 miles of the Village's corporate boundary. For the unincorporated areas on the east side of Busse Road, the land uses are split between light industrial! office/research (O/R Zoning District) and general industrial (1-1 Zoning District). The less intensive land uses are meant to buffer the industrial use from the multi-family housing on the west side of Busse Road. The mix of uses supports the future STAR line station and is a component of transit oriented development. For unincorporated properties, appropriate zoning districts would be recommended during the annexation process through a development agreement. HOUSING South Mount Prospect has been developed with a greater amount of multi-family housing than the rest of the Village. While the South Mount Prospect sub-area represents 17% of the Village's total land area, it is home to 57% of housing units in buildings with more than 20 units (2000 Census). The higher density housing and mix of uses are components that are consistent with a transit oriented district. If a transit hub is implemented at the Algonquin, Busse and Dempster intersection or the STAR line station is developed, the Village will have the housing density and mix of uses for a transit oriented neighborhood. Village programs such as, the Systematic Inspection Program and Crime Free Housing Program should be continued to ensure that the Village provides residents with all types of high quality housing: entry-level, rental, and ownership opportunities. VISUAL AND AESTHETIC ELEMENTS South Mount Prospect was developed in a piecemeal fashion resulting in an inconsistent appearance in streetscapes. The area would benefit from a comprehensive Streetscape program to help unify the land uses and enhance pedestrian circulation along the major corridors. The Village should consider making public improvements to enhance its visual presence, such as the planting of parkway trees, installation of banners, sidewalks, pedestrian lighting, and other similar design elements. Page 12 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan RECOMMENDATIONS The Village updated the Comprehensive Plan in 2007 and designated future land uses for the entire Village and for land within 1.5 miles beyond the corporate limits of the Village. The Comprehensive Plan designates the Village's land use policy through the Future Land Use Map; thus, ensuring consistent development and compatible land uses for the incorporated and unincorporated land in the south Mount Prospect sub-area. LONG RANGE PLANNING CONCEPTS Recommendations in the Goals & Objectives Section and Implementation Program apply to the entire subarea, but the "Long Range Planning Concept" section provides more specific detail for three distinct areas in the sub-area. Due to their size, location, or access to different modes of transportation additional focus was provided towards the STAR line station area, Algonquin/Busse/Dempster commercial center, and the United Airlines property. Proposed Land Use: Algonquin Road, S Busse Road, Oaldon street Business Park Setting South Mount Prospect is anticipating future growth and demand from the development of the STAR line station, full interchange at Elmhurst Road and 1-90, and the O'Hare Modernization Program. The comprehensive plan designates most of the unincorporated land in the sub-area as office/light industrial or general industrial. A potential station location has been identified at South Busse Road and 1-90, which works well with the mix of uses and the higher density housing in the area. To complement the proposed train station, a business park concept would be appropriate in the area bounded by Algonquin, Busse and Oakton with road modifications to improve access between the station and Oakton Road. The existing businesses and potential for expansion makes the Mount Prospect station a potential employment zone for future STAR line commuters. Office uses are recommended along Busse Road to mitigate conflicts between the existing residential and industrial land uses. The concept plan (Figure 8) recommends a buffer between general industrial uses and housing on South Busse Road by utilizing office uses and/ or enhanced streetscape as screening mechanisms. Proposed Industrial Park Setting Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 13 Properties located along Oakton Street are designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Light Industrial and Office Research. The concept plan calls for office and light industrial uses as well as uses that will support the growing business park, such as a small hotel. Most of the existing businesses in the area are consistent with the future vision, but improvements should be made to the public rights-of-way. Because of the close proximity of the proposed STAR line station, shared parking and access should be required of all new development. Proposed land Use: Algonquin, Busse, & Dempster intersection Commercial Center The commercial center bounded by Algonquin Road, Busse Road, and Dempster Road is important since it acts as a "downtown" for the residents immediately surrounding the area and supports a large daytime population as documented in the 2008 Retail Market Analysis. According to the Market Analysis, there are 34,143 employees within a 5-minute drive time of the Algonquin Road, Busse Road, and Dempster Street intersection. Walkability of commercial districts is an important factor in maintaining their viability and ensuring the needs of the residents are met. Improving pedestrian circulation with better crossings, lighting, and complete sidewalk network are some steps to make certain that retail and services are accessible. The Village is working to improve the pedestrian crossings at the Algonquin Road, Busse Road, and Dempster Road intersections. Public Works and Community Development have worked together using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to complete the sidewalk network in the qualifying areas of South Mount Prospect. The Village should continue to reach out to other governmental organizations and property owners to ensure the area is adequately lit for pedestrians and motorists. The roads that abut the commercial node have some of the highest ADT counts within the Village. Not only must attention be given to the walkability of the area, but movement of vehicles throughout the area must also be balanced. As discussed, Algonquin Road is a SRA, which means traffic must flow freely for the regional transportation system to function at its optimal level. IDOT recommends and controls the SRA improvements, but the Village may contribute to the road efficiency through infrastructure investments (i.e., new traffic signals at the intersections) and limiting curb cuts during the planning and development phase. .....___:.._.. _..~z::8 ~ '. . '. dl~ ~ '_ __~_____.. iI- E!iB':a'i' I~! I ~-~. g;.- '!''''>-'' - - -~'1;j"~- ':- ~ ~ II .. ,'.>. .'~;;~ :~ R * ~."'~ ;<,~ __t . . " [I -I . . J :s-: Proposed Commercial Center Page 14 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan The Village must have a comprehensive development approach when developers and property owners approach the Village regarding property improvements. For future development and redevelopment, site design that accommodates functionality as well as aesthetics is recommended. New development must have high quality design standards and adequate parking. The Village should encourage cross access agreements to reduce curb cuts and encourage shared parking. Proposed land Use: United Airlines Property Office Campus United Airlines' headquarters is located south of Dempster Street within the unincorporated area surrounded by Mount Prospect. Recently United Airlines announced that they will be moving their headquarters from this location. While United Airlines is a large employer within the sub-area, employing over 2,400 individuals, their departure may present redevelopment opportunities for the sixty-six (66) acres of land the headquarters is located on. If United decides to move all of its operations from this location, it is recommended that the Village work with potential developers on annexation and enhancements to the property. The site should continue to be an employment center for South Mount Prospect. If redeveloped, the Comprehensive Plan designates the property to be appropriately designated as Light Industrial and Office Research land uses. The large parcel could be redeveloped for an office park. To provide greater density, structured parking should be encouraged with shared parking provided between potential uses. Some residents in the sub-area stated that they would like to see more retail uses and open space if the United Airlines property is redeveloped. The use of structured parking maximizes the use of the land, potentially creating opportunities for more "outlot" retail development and open space on the property . Proposed Office Campus Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 15 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC ELEMENTS In the Existing Conditions Report, the inconsistent streetscape and need for unifying elements was discussed in order to create a more aesthetically pleasing appearance in South Mount Prospect. The following steps are recommended to create visual consistency in South Mount Prospect · Reduce curb cuts · Shared parking and cross access · Pedestrian crossing and signal enhancements · Street banners · Pedestrian lighting · Gateway/identity markings · Median planting · Pocket park plantings These visual and aesthetic recommendations are appropriate for all major corridors in South Mount Prospect Algonquin Road, Busse Road, Dempster Road, Elmhurst Road, and Oakton Street. Conidor Design Guidelines Streetscape Recommendations ----- Commercial Corridor tl; ~I"- 'tt/~1lS i'~~ eo~-ny,T ~~ ~~~ 1J:?re =~, r~~ INSm ~ , .- < ~ 1 N::;;.WAtJ 1~ > Industrial Corridor Page 16 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Because the sub-area plan is a function of the Comprehensive Plan, many of the goals and objectives from this document are similar to the Comprehensive Plan. The strategies (next section) are exclusive to South Mount Prospect. Residential A. Goal - To provide quality, affordable housing opportunities and choices for the community. I. Encourage investment and reinvestment of the residential sec- tor. 2. Preserve diversity in the housing stock to meet needs and demands of the population. 3. Continue to support the Village's property maintenance en- forcement and compliance programs. 4. Ensure amenities (recreation, services, transportation, and commercial needs) are accessible to housing. Economic Development B. Goal - To increase the viability of retail and commercial uses in the sub-area through investment, redevelopment, and develop- ment. I. Support business owners, managers, and landlords through business development programs. 2. Initiate programs to encourage investment in commercial buildings. 3. Ensure that commercial areas maintain acceptable appearance of all buildings, grounds, and parking areas. 4. Work with developers and property owners to ensure they understand efforts regarding investing in this community. Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 17 C. Goal - To improve the opportunities for industrial development in South Mount Prospect. 1. Continue to investigate financial incentive programs like the Class 6B Tax Classification for industrial land uses. 2. Work with property owners in portions of unincorporated Cook County on property improvements and long-term busi- ness park plans. 3. Minimize the negative impacts of industrial activities on neighboring land uses. 4. Evaluate the configuration and trends in the industrial sector for attraction and retention purposes. 5. Conduct an assessment of unincorporated properties for po- tential annexation into the Village. Transportation & Infrastructure D. Goal- Ensure a transportation system that is safe and consistent for all types of travelers (motorist, pedestrian, bicyclists) and that the infrastructure systems meet demands of future growth. 1. Improve the appearance and functionality of major corridors by implementing the adopted Corridor Design Guidelines. 2. Collaborate with neighboring municipalities for consistency between shared borders. 3. Collaborate with transit agencies on future improvements, in- cluding the STAR Line Station and bus route improvements, as recommended in the 2009 Public Transportation Study and Strategic Regional Arterial documents. 4. Encourage lot consolidation, shared driveways, parking lot interconnects, and the use of planned unit developments for redevelopment. Community Facilities, Services & Open Space E. Goal - Ensure that the South Mount Prospect community is receiving a high level of community services and recreational op- portunities. 1. Ensure facilities and services are accessible to everyone in the community needing assistance. 2. Continuously seek out opportunities for open space expansion and enhancements. 3. Continue to host educational meetings, events, and seminars with the community. Page 18 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM The Implementation Program lists specific strategies to meet the goals and objectives of the previous section. Making clear and measurable actions are the best way to meet a goal. In the implementation plan, "strategies" reference the objectives to which they meet and should be read "Strategy 1 is related to objective AI." Strategies are listed as "action" or " study" indicating that more information on the topic is needed before taking action. Timing The timing column indicates if the strategy will be implemented within 5 years (short-term), 5-15 years (long-term), or is an ongoing strategy of the Village of Mount Prospect. Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 19 Residential strategy Type of Related Timing Responsibility Strategy Objective A.x. I Provide information to developers, owners, and Action AI Short-Term Community brokers about reinvestment and investment Development resources (i.e. development requirements, available funding/grants, demographic information) 2 Continue to implement systematic housing Action A3 Ongoing Community inspections and Crime Free Housing Program and Development expand the programs to include seminars on tenant responsibilities and rights. 3 Implement recommendations from the Action A4 Short-Term Community RTAP Public Transportation study to increase Development accessibility of Village-wide services. 4 Continue to implement housing rehabilitation Action AI,A2 Ongiong Community financial incentives programs for qualifying Development, households. Department of Housing and Urban Development · Indicates which goals and ojectives the strategy originated. This should be read as "Strategy 1 derives from Goal A Objective 1. Economic Development - Commercial strategy Type of Related Timing Responsibility Strategy Objective B.x. I Work with HUD to establish a Neighborhood Action Bl, B2 Short-Term Community Revitalization Study Area (NRSA) for expanded Development, use of CDBG funds DepartmentofHou~ng and Urban Development 2 Establish a commercial grant program to provide Action B2 Long-Term Community financial assistance to prospective businesses to Development upgrade building fac;:ades and/or interior space. 3 Continue to investigate new grants or incentives Action BI Ongiong Community to fund South Mount Prospect initiatives. Development 4 Host business seminars to educate business Action BI, 83, B4 Ongiong Community leaders on the resources available, responsibilities, Development and best practices of business. . Indicates which goals and ojectives the strategy originated. This should be read as "Strategy 1 derives from Goal 8, Objective 1 & 2. Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 20 Economic Development - Industrial strategy Type of Related Timing Responsibility Strategy Objective c.x* I Implement the STAR Une station area concept Action C4 Ongiong Community plan to create an Industrial Park to help attract Development new businesses and retain existing businesses. 2 Host meetings with property owners of Action C2,C3 Short-Term Community unincorporated land to discuss annexation Development, opportunities and benefits. Village Manager's Office 3 Increase marketing for South Mount Prospect as Action CI Long-Term Community industrial center. Development, Village Manager's Office 4 Work with new and existing businesses to establish Action C3 Ongiong Community high quality developments Development 5 Conduct an annexation study study C5 Long-Term Community Development, Village Manager's Office, Public Works * Indicates which goals and ojectives the strategy originated. This should be read as "Strategy 1 derives from Goal C, Objective 4. Transportation & Infrastructure Strategy Type of Related Timing Responsibility Strategy Objective D.x* 1 Install pedestrian improvements including Action 01,04 Short-Term Community sidewalks, lighting, and crossing signals to Development, encourage safe pedestrian walkways in South Public Works Mount Prospect. 2 Implement corridor streetscape improvements, Action 01,02 Long-Term Community including gateway signage and parkway Development, plantings. Public Works 3 Continue to monitor utility infrastructure and Action 05 Ongiong Community perform improvements where necessary. Development 4 Implement the recommendations from the Action 03,04 Long-Term Community Public Transportation Study, such as creating a Development, Public transportation hub in South Mount Prospect and Works, Village Managers improving transit connectivity to the rest of the Office Village. , IndiCaTes wnlcn oolS and 0 eCTrves me straTI on InoTed. InIS snould be read os ":>TroTe I ( enves rrom GOO D;V5iecl1ve I & 4. 9 egy 9 gy Page 21 Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Community Facilities, Services & Open Space Strategy Type of Related Timing Responsibility Strategy Objective E.x* Work with ComEd and Park District's to better Action E2 Short-Term Community utilize the ComEd Right of Way property for Development, recreational purpose. Public Works 2 Collaborate with both local organizations and Action ' EI, E3 Ongiong Community Village Departments to ensure successful service Development delivery in South Mount Prospect. 3 Continue to support special events and cultural Action EI, E3 Ongiong Community festivals to attract additional customer base to Development, Village the area. Manager's Office, Public Works, Police Department Draft South Mount Prospect Sub-Area Plan Page 22 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department Mount Prospect MEMORANDUM FROM: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~I~ .1I(,{df . TO: DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2009 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN SUBJECT: The Community Development Department is seeking to officially adopt the Pub i ransportation System Plan, prepared with the financial assistance of the Regional Transit uthority's (RTA) Community Planning Program (formerly known as the Regional Technical Assi tance Program or "RT AP"). The Public Transportation System Plan was originally discussed at the May 12, 2009 Committee of Whole meeting. During the meeting, the Board expressed concerns regarding details of the proposed Station Area Plan. Prior to adopting the Plan the Board directed staff to solicit feedback on the Station Area Plan. Since the COW meeting, staff has organized open houses to review the proposed Station Area Plan with surrounding businesses and residents. Based on the feedback from the meetings, staff requested that the consultant team revise the Station Area Plan exhibit to generally describe how much more growth the areas may support without showing conceptual details of parking lots, detention basins, and new building footprints. The exhibit has been incorporated into the final document and the language in the report has been modified to reflect the updated exhibit. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review at their November 3, 2009 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. \\vf1\VH1 HCD$\PLAN\Grant Apps\2008\RT A (Transportation)\Final Reports\OctoberVBWB 11309 Cover Memo_rtap.doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department Mount Prospect MEMORANDUM ~ TO: FROM: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER CLARE L. O'SHEA, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: APRIL 30, 2009 SUBJECT: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STUDY Background The Village of Mount Prospect was awarded a grant from the Regional Transportation Authority through their Community Planning Program (formerly the Regional Technical Assistance Program) to evaluate the Village's public transportation system. The study sought to investigate the current level of service, usage, and access to Metra, Pace and bicycle routes and provide recommendations for enhanced service. The Village retained the consultant team of TranSystems, KLOA, and the Lakota Group to complete the study. Analysis The overall goal of the public transportation study was to provide a plan for a balanced public transportation system which provides for safe and efficient movement of vehicles and pedestrians, supports surrounding land development, and enhances regional transportation facilities. In order to achieve the goal, the following objectives were developed: 1. Assess current transit services (rail and bus) and multi-modal (vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian) access to transit services and facilities. 2. Assess strategies to encourage full utilization of these transit services and multi-modal accef?S to and circulation within the associated transit facilities. 3. Improve transportation linkages among Village destinations and Metra commuter rail and Pace services. 4. Develop a transit-oriented development and access improvement plan for the proposed STAR Line Station area. 5. Provide actionable implementation strategies for both Village-wide transit enhancements and transit-oriented development opportunities for the proposed STAR Line Station and identify potential funding sources. A steering committee, consisting of Village, Metra, Pace, and RTA staff oversaw the development of the study. The consultant team gathered information for the existing conditions report through interviews with stakeholders, data from transit agencies and the Village, and field observations. Based on this information, service gaps and needs were developed with recommendations for improving service. The implementation matrix provides strategies to improve the connectivity and functionality of public transportation in and around the Village. Public Transportation Study Committee ofthe Whole Meeting May 12,2009 Page 2 . Recommendation The consultant team is prepared to present the findings and recommendations to the Committee of the Whole. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. If the Committee of the Whole concurs with the recommendations of the study, staff will forward the report to a Village Board meeting for final considertation. I concur: ~,~l:Onb~ Director of Community Development RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect received a "Community Planning" grant from the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) to develop a public transportation system plan including a transit oriented plan for the proposed Suburban Transit Access Route (STAR) Line station; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect established a steering committee to oversee the development of the public transportation system plan, with representation from the RTA, Metra, and Pace, as well as Village of Mount Prospect staff; and WHEREAS, a public transportation system plan was prepared with the input of all members of the steering committee, including the RT A, Metra and Pace; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that adoption of the Public Transportation System Plan will enhance planning and implementation efforts of public transit and multi-modal improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Village Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby adopt the Village of Mount Prospect Public Transportation Plan, the subject of this Resolution, a copy of said Plan is attached and made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit "A." SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of November, 2009. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\WIN\RES\PUBLlCTRANSPORTA TIONSYSTEMPLANNOV2009.doc D Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: OCTOBER 19, 2009 TO: VILLAGER MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE CLERK LISA ANGELL FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER SUBJECT: WAL-MART EXPANSION 930 EAST RAND ROAD (MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA) Attached please find the Village Board Approval and Acceptance form for the subject project. The project has been satisfactorily completed and I recommend approval of this project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the November 3, 2009 Village Board Meeting. J&~ Cc: Glen R. Andler, Public Works Director H:\Engineering\Development\DEV\BOARDACC\ Wal-MartMm VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND/OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL PROJECT: W AL-MART EXPANSION LOCATION: 930 East Rand Road (Mount Prospect Plaza) DATE: October 14. 2009 ST AFF APPROVAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: PLAT OF SUBDNISION RECENED: PLAT OF SUBDNISION RECORDED: AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: \Dr 1 S- ......IN/A ~ ENGINEER CLERK CLERK ENGINEER PUB.WKS.DIR. COMM.DEV.DIR. FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE WATER MAIN PARKWAY LANDSCAPING Complete Complete PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED WATER SERVICE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE STORM SEWER SITE LIGHTING PARKING LOT SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, TIDS DAY OF ,2009. Village Clerk Mount Prospect Mount Prospect Public Works Department ~ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: OCTOBER 19, 2009 TO: VILLAGER MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE CLERK LISA ANGELL FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER SUBJECT: THE EMERSON 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET Attached please find the Village Board Approval and Acceptance form for the subject project. The project has been satisfactorily completed and I recommend approval of this project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the November 3, 2009 Village Board Meeting. Cc: Glen R. Andler, Public Works Director H :\Engineering\Development\DEV\80ARDACC\EmersonMm VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND/OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL PROJECT: THE EMERSON LOCATION: 100 South Emerson DATE: October 14. 2009 ST AFF APPROVAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: PLAT OF SUBDNISION RECENED: PLAT OF SUBDNISION RECORDED: AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: ENGINEER CLERK CLERK ENGINEER PUB.WKS.DIR. COMM.DEV.DIR. FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE STORM SEWER ROADWAYS PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED WATER SERVICE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE STORM SEWER SITE LIGHTING PARKING LOT BRICK SIDEWALK 125 L.F. - 12" 355 SY. Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF ,2009. Village Clerk