Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 09/05/2000 ext Ordinance No. 5137 Next Resolution No. 30-00 Deputy '~/~age c~erk ORDER OF BUSINESS REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday 50 South Emerson Street September 5, 2000 Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks IlL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Skowron IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Prikkel V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2000 VI, *APPROVE BILLS (To be considered under Consent Agenda) VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. PROCLAMATION: "CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK" September 17-23, 2000 B. PROCLAMATION: "LAWSUIT ABUSE AWARENESS WEEK" September 18-23,2000 C. PROCLAMATION: "PROSTATE CANCER AWARENESS MONTH" September, 2000 ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT fO0 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064. D. Appointments VIII, COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IX. CONSENT AGENDA *AIl items listed with an asterisk are considered routine by the Village Board and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of those items unless a Board member, or resident from the audience, so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considerbd in its normal sequence on the agenda. X, OLD BUSINESS A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONINGI OF THE VILLAGE CODE (Staff requests deferral to the September 19, 2000 Village Board meeting due to ongoing research and potential modifications to the proposed ordinance) This ordinance amends Sections VII, VIII, and XIX of the Zoning Code by adding "outdoor dining areas" as permitted uses in the B-3, B-4, and B-5 zoning districts, establishing m~n~mum standards for the operation of outdoor dining areas, and establishing a licensing process for Village ~eview of them. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval bya vote of 4-0. E3. '2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS 630 WEST RAND ROAD (Exhibit A) The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use permit to allow the demolition of an existing structure and construction of a (Citgo) gas station, with a canopy which will cover the gas pumps and encroach into the required 30-foot setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 6-0. C. 2"0 reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ( Exhibit B) The petitioner is requesting approval of amendments to Chapter 14 (Zoning), C.-R (Conservation Recreation) zoning district, of the Village Code, relative to uses and facilities in parks. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 791 EAST RAND ROAD (Exhibit C) (At the request of the petitioner, this ordinance was deferred from the August 15 meeting) The petitioner is requesting the rezoning of a vacant lot currently zoned R-1 (Single Family Residence), to B-3 (Commun ty Shopping) zoning district to allow the construction of a retail development The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 24. resulting in a denial. A super majority vote is required from the Village Board for final approval. E. '~'2nd reading of AN ORDINAN( MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit D) This ordinance amends Chapter 3, currently not in use and designated as "Reserved ' by renaming it "Definitions." This chapter will include definitions relative to gender references throughout the Code as well as other definitions as needed. Xl. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 29-2000, 521 N. Eastwood Avenue 1~ reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS 521 NORTH EASTWOOD AVENUE (Exhibit E) This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit to allow the construction of an unenclosed covered front pomh in the required thirty-foot (30') front setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 7-0. B. ZBA 32-2000, 411 N. Emerson Street 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 411 NORTH EMERSON STREET (Exhibit F) This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit to allow the construction of an unenclosed covered front porch within the required thirty-foot (30') front setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 7-0. C. ZBA 28-2000, 1104 W. Central Road - APPEAL The petitioner has requested approval of a variation to allow the construction of a six-foot wooden fence, with the finished side facing inward. According to the Zoning Code, the 7-0 vote for approval by the Zoning Board is final, however, this decision is being appealed by residents. The Village Board's decision is final. D. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CREATION OF A FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (Exhibit G) This program will provide assistance to qualifying first-time homebuyers by covering specific down payment and closing costs. E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT (Exhibit H) This ordinance authorizes the sale and donation of surplus department radios to other law enforcement agencies. F. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORI.71NG THE USE OF QUICK-TAKE CONDEMNATION PROCEDURES TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 WEST BUSSE AVENUE (YE OLDE TOWN INN) (Exhibit I) This ordinance authorizes the use of quick-take condemnation proceedings to acquire the rear portion of the subject property. Xll. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT A. *Bid results: 1. Pickup truck for Mount Prospect Fire Department 2. Replacement of Motor Control Cabinet (MCC) at Pump Station No. 16, 1629 W. Algonquin Road 3. 2000 CDBG Sidewalk Program B. Request for Board approval to amend contracts between the Village and SDI Consultants for the design and project management of the Phase II Streetscape Program and the train station depot,prOject, C. Request for Board approval Of labor agreement between the Village and the Metropolitan' Alliance of Police for the years 2000-2003. D. Status Report Xlll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XIV. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES ~ THE August 15, 2000 CALL CALL TO ORDER TO ORDER Village Clerk Velma Lowe called the meeting to order at 7:43 p.m. ROLL CALL ROLL CALL Present: Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Dennis Prikkel Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Irvana Wilks Absent: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM PRO TEM: In the absence of Mayor Farley, Trustee Prikket, seconded by. Trustee Lohrstorfer, SKOWRON nominated Trustee Michaele Skowron to serve as Mayor Pro Tern. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. PLEDGE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Trustee Prikkel led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION INVOCATION Trustee Lohrstorfer gaye the invocation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MINUTES Trustee WiIkS, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held August 1, 2000. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Mayor Pro Tern Skowron explained that this meeting was only the second of which the BILLS Board would use the Consent Agenda, w,,h, ich was approve,d,, ~t tl~e Ju y 18 meeting. She stated that the next item on the agenda APPROVE BILLS was noted with an aster sk and that all items further noted in' that manner wou d be cons dered with one mot on as "'IX. CONSENT' AGENDA.;' A! th s time, however~ Mayor Pro Tern Skowron asked ~the Board and those in attendance Whether 'J:ev wished~0 remove an~) item from the Consent Agenda Trustee Wilks requestee ti{e remowl of the foll0v~ir~gitems from the Consent Agendal to be discussed in the order shown on the agenda: X. OLD BUSINESS B. Ordinance amending Chapter 14 of Village Code XI. NEW BUSINESS MAYOR'S F. Resolution authorizing agreement between the Village and IDOT REPORT: MAYOR'S REPORT SCHOOL'S Mayor Pro Tern Skowron read, and presented Police Officer Michael Jolie with, a OPEN proclamation recognizing "School's Open Safety Week" from August 21-27, 2000. SAFETY WEEK An ordinance was presented for second reading, to amend Chapter 13 of the Village Code by granting a Class "C" liquor license(retail package sales only) to Dominick's Finer Foods 1145 Mount Prespect P aza Richard Henddcks, former Mount Prospect resident, addressed the Board with concerns relative to Dominick's being in close proximity to a smaller liquor store in the shopping plaza. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer moved for approval of Ordinance No. 5135: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert; Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of the following items of business: BILLS 1. Approve bills and financial report RES. 2. A Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Lease Between the Village and NO. 28-00 VoiceStream Wireless REPAIR & 3. Bid results: CLEAN A. Cleaning, repai[, and repainting of ground storage water tank at WATER Station 17, 1480 N. Elmhurst Road TANK 4. Request for Board approval of contract amount with ALI, Inc. for sod restoration SOD in utility locations thro~gh0bt the Village. RESTORA- TION 5. Request for Board apprqval to allow an increase in contracts with specific nurseries for the share~lL~ost tree replacement program. TREE Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowren, Wilks REPLACE- Nays: None MENT Motion carried. OLD BUSINESS ZBA 08-2000, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect ZBA 08-2000 An ordinance was presented for second reading, which would authorize the following AMEND amendments to the Zoning Code; TEXT: 1. To permit outdoor dining'areaS in the B-3, B-4, and B-5 zoning districts; OUTDOOR 2. To estabiish minim~Jm's(ah'dar(Js for the operation of outdoor dining areas; DINING 3. To estab sh a censi'ng" ~'~0~ess for V age staff's rev ew of outdoor d n ng areas At the request of staff Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer moved to defer this item to the September 5, 2000 Village Board m~eting. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowror~, WiIks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 2 - August15, 2000 ZA?.A_.'I,3..~2000 ZBA13-2000, Text Ame~d~,e.~:i~!i~?[~punt Prospect MIcNU An ordinance was pre~i~i~J ~(~:~, r~'~i~{~, Which e§tablishes mimmum s~andards TEXT: for artificial lighting in parking lots. The ZBA had recommended approval by a vote of PARKING 4-0~ LOT LIGHTING Bill Cooney, Directo~ of Community Development, explained that the ordinance presented at this meeting was revised, due to an error in the one presented for first reading at the August 1 meeting, Hecreditedresident, David Toeppen, for notifying him of the error, in which references were made to a standard of lightiqg measurements, that of footcandles, when the actual standard that was used in the previous ordinance was luxes. Trustee Wilks asked thatthe.definition of footcandles be included in the Village Code. ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel. moved for approval of Ordinance NO. 5136 No. 5136: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER ~ 4 OF THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, prikkel~ Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carriec NEW BUSINESS ZBA 24-2000 ZBA 24-2000, 630 WestRand Road 630 W. RAND An ordinance was.presented for first.reading {o grant a Conditional Use permit and ROAD Variations for the demolition of an existing structure and construction of a (Citgo) gas station, with a Canopy covering the six gas pumps and encroaching into the required thirty-foot (30')setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) had recommended approval by a vote of 6~0. John Kouchoukos, representing the petitioners, addressed the Board's concerns relative to screening ~he pa[king lot lights from neighboring res dents and hours of operation. He indiCated that the P0ssibility of having a 24-hour operation in the future has been c0nsiderad. Headdressed a letter which had !~een sent to Board members by resident Larry Perrone 1114 Thomas More Terrace which is adjacent to the subject property in -which Mr. Perrone requested the construction of a (minimum six-foot) fence between the subject property and his subdivision. Mr. Kouchoukos assured staff that the landscape plan does incorporate adequate shielding for the property owners, and he would cooperate with all Village requirements in that respect. This o[dinance will be presented for second reading at the September 5 Village Board meeting. ZBA 05-2000~ 791 E. Rand Road ZBA 05-2000 1st reading of the AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE 791 E. RAND VILLAGEOFMOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY LOCATEDAT 79~ EAST RAND ROAD ROAD The petitioner had submitted a written request that this item be deferred to the next Village Board meeting. Trustee Hoefert. seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to defer the first reading of the above ordinance to the September 5, 2000 Village Board meeting. Upon mllcall: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorrer; Pdkkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 3 - August15, 2000 ZBA 05-2000 An ordinance was presented for first reading which would amend Chapter 14 (Zoning) as AMEND it relates to uses and facilities m parks, or the C-R (Conservation Recreation) zoning district. TEXT: C-R ZONING Mr. Cooney stated that this amendment was tabled following its presentation in March, DISTRICT 2000, because a question was raised regarding overall notification requirements for text amendments. He indicated that the Code has since been amended, and that proper notification was given prior to its review by the Zoning Board on July 27, 2000. At the July 27 meeting, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the proposed amendments by a vote of 6-0. He explained that the proposed amendment addresses ball fields as permitted or conditional uses. required setbacks for structures, definition of structure, width of bike paths, sidewalks, jogging trails, and park facilities. Following a lengthy discussion primarily focused on setbacks and the allowable height of light poles on baseball fields, Trustee Lohrstorfer suggesting that Mr. Cooney contact a lighting.expert to appear at the next meeting, and address questions from the Board. Mr. Cooney.responded that he would act on that request. This ordinance will be presented at the next Village Board meeting for second reading. An ordinance was presented for first reading to amend Chapter 3 of the Village Code. AMEND This chapter is currently not in use, and designated as "Reserved." With approval of the CH. 3: proposed ordinance, the chapter'would be renamed "Definitions" and would include DEFINITIONS definitions relative to gender references throughout the Code, as well as other general definitions as needed. This ordinance will be presented for second reading at the September 5 Village Board meeting. IDOT GRANT · FOR TRAIN A resolution was presented to authorize an agreement between the Village and the IMPROVE- Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), to.accept a grant in the amount of $400,000 for general improvements to the Matra train station parcel. These funds wilt be used MENTS primarily for improving the traffic flow around the station, and upgrading the landscaping and signage. RES. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 29-00 No. 29-00: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS DEPAR?MENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRAIN STATION PARKING LOT AND SURROUNDING AREA Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert. Lohrstorfer. Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. A brief discussion was held relative to the possible relocation (further east or west] of the train station depot. MANAGER'S REPORT: VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT INCREASE Assistant Village Manager David Strahl, acting in the Village Manager's absence, TREE presented a request for Village Board approval to allow an increase in contracts with REPLACE- specific nurseries for the shared-cost tree replacement program. MENT CONTRACT Page 4- August15,2000 Glen Andter, Director of P.ubiic..~Br~,preyided information, stating that due to the windstorm of May 18, 'J 6§ b:~ W-~'~a~aged and required removal. As a result, WEll_ER, additional funding is needed to honor residents' requests for tree replacement. WILSON, Mr. Andler stated that Weiler, Wilson, Berthold, Fox Ridge, and Beaver Creek nurseries BERTHOED, would supply the trees, and BC Landscape would plant them; the Village had previously FOX RIDGE, & approved and entered into contracts with these companies in February, 2000. BEAVER CREEK Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to increase the shared-cost tree NURSERIES replacement program contract, by $35,000, if required to honor all shared-cost requests. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefed, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel. Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ANY OTHER ANY OTHER BUSINESS BUSINESS Trustee Pdkkel asked that staff investigate activities of transient merchants selling furniture at the corner of Golf and Busse Roads. He stated that he has reported similar activities in the past, and asked that consideration be given to the closure of the curb cuts on that parcel, as well as planting grass rather than leaving it as a paved surface. Trustee Hoefert stated his agreement with the suggestions. Trustee Wilks reported on an article that she had seen in the August 1 'J Chicago Tribune newspaper indicating that residents of this area might be eligible to participation in a class-action lawsuit against AT&T. Acting Village Manager David Strahl stated that it does not appear to him, based on correspondence from AT&T, that the service subscribers would reap any substantial financial benefits. CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION Mayor Pro Tern Skowron stated there would be no Closed Session, as listed on the ADJOURN agenda. ADJOURNMENT Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 p.m. The meeting was adjoumed following a simultaneous vote. Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Page 5 - August15,2000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION 31-Aug-00 Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstrnt Balance 08/11/00 Per Attached Creditsl Balance 08/11/00 08/31/00 List of Bills Debits 08131100 General Fund 7,684,535 373,844 440,951 7,617,428 Special Revenue Funds Refuse Disposal Fund 1,147,878 41,355 130,096 1,059,137 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 1,572,352 38 39,058 1,533,332 Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 20,487 8,735 29,222 Community Development BIk Grant Fund (18,468) 22,879 4,623 (212) Debt Service Funds 3,436,445 300 3,436,145 Capital Proiects Funds Capital Improvement Fund 2,682,275 4,150 7,235 2,679,190 Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 54,512 54,512 Capital Improvement Construction Fund 181,833 181,833 Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund (15,661) 4,971 (20,632) Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,057,326 83,772 4,141,096 1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,743 4,743 Flood Control Construction Fund 3,011,396 50,150 2,961,246 Enterprise Funds Water & Sewer Fund 2,815,512 246,303 36,881 3,024,934 Parking System Revenue Fund 704,833 9,821 1,040 713,614 Internal Service Funds Vehicle Maintenance Fund 197,928 10,876 187,052 Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,200,475 5,200,475 Computer Replacement Fund 273,633 273,633 Risk Management Fund 3,135,834 48,974 30,605 3,154,203 Trust & Aqency Funds Police Pension Fund 29,250,115 15,228 29,051 29,236,292 Fire Pension Fund 30,565,694 12,050 26,653 30,551,091 Flexcomp Trust Fund 697 9,270 9,967 Escrow Deposit Fund 1,502,534 77,686 38,479 1,541,741 Benefit Trust Funds 93,024 544 92,480 97,559,932 954,105 851,513 97,662,524 ~PONT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN! THuRSDAy AUG3100 t1:tl PAGE 1 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT ~RUNPECT LIST OF BILLS PRE~TED TO THE DAR/) OF TRUSTEES UN~ AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NA~E INVOICE DESCRIPTtUN AMOUNT 001 02919 303 CA~ ASSOCIATIUN, INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES 391.30 01071 ADDISON BUILDING RATERIAL CO. SREPLIES 13.46 01246 AIRGRS NORTH CENTRAL CYLINDER RENTAL 37.45 05245 ALCA RECERT-JOE GATTAS 25.00 01423 ALLIED A~PI{~LT PAVING CO~PAXY PAVING/PATCHING SUPPLIES 2050.t7 01561 AMERICAN CHARGE SERVICE SENIOR TAXI RIDES 297.40 05222 k~REICA~ INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM RF2~TAL 468.92 UNIFORM RENTAL & CLEANING 125.86 UNIFORM RENTAL & CLEANING 117.50 712.28 01620 k~ERICEN LAI~DSCAPING INC. CONTRACTUAL RESTORATION 12698.00 01780 A~ENITEC]{ SERVICE 57.45 01833 ANUNRSON LOCK CC~PANY MISC.NARDWARE SUPPLIES 38.88 lABOR CRAREES 20.00 58.88 01840 ANDE~ON PEST CONTROL RODENT CONTROL-RELLER CREEK 260.00 AVITROL ON ROOF TOPS 66.25 RODENT CONTROL 260.00 SERVICE 360.00 946.25 00367 ADDERSUN, DONALD M. FOOD/E~ERG.SUPP 167.40 03327 ANDERSON, PETER TAL CHI INSTRUCTION 445.00 05237 APOLLO POS,TABLE TOILETS PORTABLE FACILITIES 505.00 01994 ARk~%RE REFUNS~{ENT SERVICES COFFEE SUPP 88.30 02167 ANRON ROAD CONSTRUCTION PAVING/PATCHING SUPPLIES 587.60 02270 AT&T SERVICE 3. OD SERVICE 10.10 SERVICE 20.19 SERVICE 10.10 SERVICE 38.37 SERVICE 10.10 SERVICE t5.15 SERVICE 26.25 SERVICE 8.05 SERVICE 8.05 SERVICE 36.35 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 R~: THURSDAY AUG3100 11:11 PAGE 2 REi~ASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOb~NT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ AD,ST I1 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 DEUT VF~DOR NBR VENDOR N~ INVOICE DEDCRIUTION SERVICE 204.97 SERVICE 200.93 SERVICE 129.24 720.91 03513 ATA~RAH, YOUSKP REBATE I05.00 02283 AT~AS BOBCAT INC. RENT~ 300.00 05231 BACHTELL, JANICE C. ~ ESTATE TRANSFER T~ 680.00 05206 BRAUTI~L RAGS V~EICLE TO~ELS 148.56 05223 RE~ PAVtg~A'? CRACK SRA~!NG PRO~l~l 6210.00 02745 BENTHOLD ~ESERY TREES 1670.00 02788 BEST ~ALITY CLEA~ING, INC. SERVICES 766!.00 SERVICES 7785.00 15446.00 05232 BLACKSHERE, TC~ A~D ZEE RFA5 ESTATE Tk~2~SFER TA~ 498.00 02938 BO;9~N DISTRIBUTION C~UTER MISC.A~?O PAR~S 30.26 01006 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. CAR RASH-ACCT4500 i5.75 01008 BUSSE'S EDOW~ES & GIUTS EDORA~ ARRANGi~C:I~T 01014 CADE INDUSTRIES CLRANiNG SUPPLIES 873.50 01018 CALIGOR ~DICk5 SUPPLIES 116.90 01025 C~NING, ~TT BACKPACKS I40.00 01043 CASSETTE SERVICES, INC. AUDIO CASSETTE TAPES 382.73 01049 CDW G~ENT, INC SI~giS KINGST~ 369.84 REPL%CING ~CHARGE SER~.~R 389.00 MICROSOK PRESS 38.15 FIBER C~LE i07.49 904.48 01053 CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO PHO~ CHARGES 138.01 01058 CENTURY L%BS, INC DUSTER STARTER KIT 483.85 01097 CINTAS CORP UNIFORM ~R~i~TA~/CLRANING 350.76 UNIFO~ EXPENSE 36.00 ~IFO~ EXPENSE !10.30 505.08 01102 CITIBk~K, N.A. AOL ONLIRE SERVICE 45.00 ~EPORT: APBOANDRPT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: THURSDAY ANG3100 I1:11 PAGE 3 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LiST OF BILLS PRESUN~ED TO TNE BOAND OF TRUSTEES F~ AUOCST tl 2000 TO AUOCST 31 2000 DER VEN~O~ NBR VENDOR MAM~ INVOICE DNEC~I~TION ~OUNT 01118 CLERE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL FOR - 082400 700.00 PAYROLL FOR - 082400 190.00 890.00 01151 CC~UNITY CONSOLIDATED BUILDING RENTAL 254.00 05238 CURTIS, JOAI{~E CLOVEN SERVICE 280.00 01223 DAILY OFFICE PRODUCTS OF~CE SUPPLIES 64.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 211.75 282.61 03916 DECAT~t~ ELECTRONICS, iNC. kaNA~ UNIT 1522.00 01253 DES PLAiNES ELASS CUNPANY GLASS 444.00 04051 DIGE~, INC I~ERNET RERVICE 1376.66 04707 DIRECT RESPONSE VEHICLE FOLLO~qP MAILING 2206.17 01279 DISTINCT!RE BUSINESS PRODUCTS TONER & DEVELOPNE 698.25 BOXE~ STAPLES FOR COPIER 98.51 796.76 01287 DOTP, SYST~S, INC. INV48523!/45332~/402770 1246.20 REPAI~ 3377.21 4623.41 01291 DO~R ELEVATOR COMEANY MAINTENANCE 190,57 05224 OCPAGE CO~Y REIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC. REGISTER-~CMA~DSON 100.00 01320 D~IC G~APHICS MAGAZINE OCBSCRIPTION 27.00 05244 EDMAPTL STEVE EXPENSES 30.00 05127 ELINT K JOURNALS WINDOWS ~ PROFRSSIUNAL 109.00 01340 ~ASSY COFFEE REUICE COFFEE & SUPPLIES 78.02 0135{) ENDEAVUN PLUS NEDICAL ~S 184.00 MEDICAL ~S t847.00 2031.00 01366 ~PE~IkN BACKGROUND-SENVICE 25.OC 0t~69 FAIEViEW PRINTING SERVICE ENVELOPES 59.00 01374 FA~EY AND ASS~. TAG/NAME PLATES 162.40 REPORT: AFEOARDRET GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: THUREDAY A~]G3100 11:11 PAGE 4 NELRARE ID : VILLAGE OF gooI~ PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESF/~TED TO THE BOARD OF TEUST~ EN~ AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 3t 2000 DEPT VF/~DOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NE$CRIPTIUN AMOUNT 01377 FEDERA~ NEPNESS CONE AINEILL~802454207495 14.44 AIREILL2890679772 23.92 AIREILL~812486269916 10.75 49.11 00330 FELTEN, BAREREA REIMBU~E EXPIRES 30.00 01392 FINE DEPT. SAFETY OFCR~. ASSN. ACCINE~T PRE%~DON P~O~RA~ 35.00 F~EP~NiP 75.00 110.00 00102 FINE PENSION F~ND PAYROLL ~R - 082400 12035.27 05219 FIRST AMERICAN RAAL ESTATE SOLUtIOnS COOK IL CD DATA-MONTHLY DIV 1990.00 05170 5~ GLORAL REFERENCE MATi,~ 502.50- REFERENCE ~ATLi'~IALS 502.50 RE~7/~ENCE ~AIL~iALS 502.50 502.50 01444 FRIES A~IVE TOW ~ULAN~ %520 75.00 04991 G & M INC. SIDhL~A~K EN~AM 21919.00 05220 GARDEN BOUQUET S~PATEY Ak~3GEMENT 37.00 01469 GATEWAY C~PANIES INC. SUPPORT ON WIA~3UNS INSTALLER 129.00 PENTI~ iii 2013.00 2142.00 01485 GFEk~AN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BOND RNEEWAL 30.00 01502 GLOBAL FIRE EQUIP}~NT, INC. GE~TEX PA~RIC,S~T IRON 596.24 05221 GORDY'S LAKEFRONT N~RINE, INC. DIVE Ci%NTEN DR SCUBA TEAM 350.00 05207 UORU, HASAkATHEN RE ~3ND 9.00 01551 HALL SIGNS, INC~. GREEN U CHA~ POST 1824.00 01555 HANEY AND SONS, B. INC. pREK~Ay TREE R~OVAL 2421.04 PAREWAY TREE NE~OVAL 1682.71 4103.75 01558 RANSEN ASSOCIATES MONTHLY SENVi-CE 451.47 MONTHLY BEN, NE 262.09 MONTHLY SENV'.GE 100.00 813.56 01580 HENRICKSEN & C~PANY, INC. LABOR C~-ARGE 52.50 'REPORT: NEBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: Tt{ONEDAY AUG3100 11:tl PAGE 5 RELEkSE ID : VIIJAGE OF MOUNT PROMPEET LIST OF BII~S PRESENTED TO TEE ROm OF TRUSTEES FRUN AUGUST 11 2000 TO AU~ST 3t 2000 REPT ~DOR ~BR VENDOR ~ INVOICE DESCRI~IUN M{OUNT 01597 HISPANIC CC~ITY ADVISORY COUNCIL REGISTRATION 50.00 01610 EUNEDEPOT MISC.EUILDINGDEROT 80.84 NINC.BUILOING DEPOT 273.13 MIRE.BUILDIN0 DEPOT 81.12 MISC.BUILDINGDEPOT 66.53 MISC,BUILDING DEPOT 15.8t 517.43 04008 IACE TRAINING c/o DM{ PNTERSUN REGISTRATIUN-SE~INAN 40.00 01642 IACP NEGINTER-PAVLOCK 175.00 00106 IUN~ RETIREMENT TRUST - 401 ICXA PLAN-PA~OCK 425.63 RAYROLAFOR - 082400 316.93 742.56 00107 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 PAYROLL FOR - 082400 16127.24 01689 IGFOA UNDY CNEN 85.00 00108 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PAYROLL FOR - 082400 16610.51 01685 ILLINOIS FIRE INEPECTORSASSN. BOOKS 630.00 01689 ILLINOIS GFOA AD 150.00 01698 ILLINOIS ~NICIPA~ LRAGUE ADVANCE REGISTRATION 200.00 00109 ILLINOIS ~NICIPAL RETIREMENT PAYROLL FOR - 082400 237.00 01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. SUPPLIES i714.40 01122 ILLINOIS STATE DISBUNEENENT UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 082400 519.23 PAYROLL FOR - 082400 195.50 PAYROLL FOR - 082400 126.00 PAYROLL FOR - 082400 60.00 900.73 01714 ILLINOIS STATE'POLICE ACADEMY REGISTER 1313,96 REGISTER 1500,18 REGISTER t500.18 4314.32 01896 J.C. LICHT CUNPANY MISC.PAINTING SUPPLIES 177.76 MISC.PAINTING SUPPLIES 86.97 MISC.PAINTINE SUPPLIES 20.99 285.72 01185 J.P. COOKE CO. 3 ST~PS 101.35 003~3 JANONiS, MICHAEL E. LUNCH NNE?!NG 22.37 REPORT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: TREREDAY AUG3100 lhll ?AGE 6 RELEASE ID : VIL/AOW OP MOOWT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES F~ON AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 UBPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NkME INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT 05228 JIM'S SCURA SHOP SCUBA CERTIFICATION 300.00 08200 JORDAN I}~DUBTBIA5 SUPPLY UBEE~ 19.46 01783 JOUANAL & TOPICS N~SEAPERD AN'S 587.26 01794 KALE UN!FO~S, INC. UNIFOk~ SUPPLIES 136.50 CLOTEXMG 22.95 ~N'S SILVER TIE BARS 252.00 MIAL~I~ BODY Ak~OR 305.00 OWIFOW¥~ 1096.75 1093.20 01801 KAN PRODUCTS INC MtSC.BRASS FITTINGS & BOLTS 188.24 05240 K~TZMEB, PETER P. LINE DANCE INSTRUCTION 320.00 01066 L~.REY ROESCH FORD 86381-1,86459,86381,80918,8646 722.07 01868 LASALLE NATIONAL BANK SAF~REEPING FEES-VILLAOW 848.92 01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. CAR LRASE FOR 8~R I590.37 MIBC.A~O PANTS 36.00 1626.37 00377 LEVICK!, Jk~ES REIMBUUBE ~RENSES 30.00 01910 LOWDSTRO~'S N~RSERY MOWING 2908.01' !~ 0346 50.00 2958.0t 04339 MCGUFFiN, MANE REIM~UB, SE EXPENSES 30.00 01979 MCI WI~LUBS SERVICE 37.28 SERVICE 730.34 SERVICE 67.67 SERVICE 137.86 SERVICE 105.1i 1078.26 04350 ~ISTEN, MICBREL ~IMBUREE EXPENSES 55.00 05241 MEk~ILL COTTEN REV}~URSE~E~ 30.00 00116 M~TD FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PAYROLL FOR - 082400 715.00 00117 METDPOLITAN ALLIANCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 082400 560.00 02007 ~EYUB ~TE~IAL CO, RESTORATION SUPPLIES 707.09 05209 MIDALE, MRE. ~EBATE 2!0.O0 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: THURSDAY AUS3100 11:1I PAGE 7 R~L~ ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PP~SENTED TO THE BOAD OF TRUSTEES FRC8 AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NANE iNTOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 00045 ~ DISTRIBUTORS !000 RALLOC~S INPRINTED 222.51 02046 MOBILE PRINT INC. SUPPLIES 261.30 CA~E CARDS 146.65 NOTE PADS 43.20 NOTE PADS 43.20 ~RSRAD-PRINTING 62.27 556.62 05246 MOSER, Sk~ REFS~;D REP~IT 99-1786 17.50 02066 MOUN~ PROSPECT CEkV~ER OF CC~5~ERCE ~OLF OUTING SPONSORSHIP 30.00 02107 NAPA-~ZiGHTS AOTC~OTIVE SUPPLY TDOL~ 759.00 02125 NATIOtC~£ FIRS PRCT. ASSOC. REC. iSTER-M!LLER~140208 215.00 ~-~ER~140208 !73.45 388.45 02129 NATIEN.:£ HEAT AND P~R CORP. REPAIRS !375.06 EPL%CE SCREENS 696.00 ~t~.iNTENANUB 1425.00 3496.06 02136 NAT!ONAD SAFETY COUNCIL CO~CIL PUBLICATIONS 200.00 02139 NAT!~U&iDE PAPERS FE.:T/OCT N~SRETTER 270.63 02140 RATOA B~£.OF E~RY FEE I10.00 05214 NAViG.zfOR SOLUTIONS CORP. SUPPLIES 100.00 04581 NELS J. JOHNSON TREE ~XPERTS ,R~DVAL OF TREE 440.00 05234 NEFE FI~ EE4~T S 350.00 02155 NE/TEL COk'~]NICATIONS S~JCICE CHL!ULRR FERVIC~ 983.92 001.34 05236 NTPA ~RE PREVENTION ~EK 87,45 02160 NTPA ~INARS ~C-.TIONAL FIRE CODES 425.00 02193 NORTk%MST ELECTRICk% SUPPLY ~SC.ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 355.13 ~SC.ERECTRICAD SUPPLIES 23.52 MiSC.ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 45.99 424.64 02195 NORUFmZST FORD TRUCK CENTER P.'-~RTS 367.65 02196 N~f.-V~ST MUNiCiPAL CONFERENCE ENPLOYEE ~£SISTANUB FE~P~AM 6!77.60 REPORT: APBOARDRST GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: TENRSRAY AUG3100 11:11 P~ 8 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF RILLS PRESENTED TO TEX BOAP, D OF TRUSTEES FROR AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 DEST VENDOR NBR V~DOR NA~ INVOICE DENORISTIOR 02199 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. CARTRIDGES 239.80 OFFICE SUPP 525.37 CENDIT#510475 479.80- SUPPLIES 18.66 SUPPLIES 237.76 SUPPLIES 433.79 975.58 02228 OARTOR PAVlLLION SEALTSCARE RC~E DELIVERED ~LS 1117.50 02238 OR TIME RESSENGER SERVICE MESSENGER SENVIOR 38.00 02239 ONE HOUR M~O PHOTO PHOTOS 79.80 02247 OENSAF~TY PARTS 209.57 02259 PAGENET PAGER RENTALSERVIOR 27.85 00123 PERSCO PAYROLL FOR - 082400 16407.79 02285 PEDERSEN & HOUPT SREVICE 570.05 02301 PETTY CASH - FINASCE DEET. MISC EXPENSES 55.49 MISC EXPENSES 45.00 MISCEXPENSRS 106.49 MISC EXPENSES 47.57 MISC EXPENSES 33.80 MISC EXPENSES 24.70 MISC EXPENSES 10.25 MISC EXPENSES 61.77 MISC EXPENSES 19.70 MISC EXPENSES 12.00 MISC EXPENSES 29,28 MISC EXPENSES 10.40 MISC EXPENSES 2.42 MISC EXPENSES 32.35 491.22 02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL AND SUPPLIES 13.00 TRAVEL AND SUPPLIES 42.65 55.65 02312 PIKE & FISCHER, INC FOOD PROTECTION REPORT 135.00 00124 POLICE PENSION ~ND PAYROLL FOR- 082400 15227.75 04921 POPE, ELIZABETH A, PAYROLL FOR - 082400 923.08 02344 P~EISEN ANIi~AL HOSPITAL STRAYS-JUNE,2000 310.00 05212 pRELLBERG, FRED AND ~;UEN REFUND 25.00 05220 REIB%KEL, DEhvNIS FIAG EXCHANGE 35.40 'REPORT: APBOARDt~PT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUB: THURSDAY ADG3100 11:i1 PAGE 9 RELEXSE ID : VILLAGE OF MO0}IT PROSP ~KCT~ LIST OF BILLS PREUB~ED TO THE BOARE OF TRUSTEES FRC~ AU~ST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 UB}T ~DOR UBR V~NDO~ NAME IF~OICE DESCPJPTION AMOUNT 02379 QUILL CORPO~TI~ SUPPLIES 65.67 02380 QUINLA~ PUBLISHING CUBPAMY BUILDING PEP~MITS 79.00 02396 RAYMARE OFFICE PROD & ~ POLICE CDGT#320999 44.95 POLICE ACCT,320999 163.87 FIRE ACCT#32t000 520.29 729.11 02439 RIDDLe, ROBERT P~IM~UBUB EXPENSES 89.00 02008 ROGER MZ~R & SO~ CONTk~CTUAL ~AULING & RESTO~T 150.00 CO~kACTHAL }{AULING & RESTO3AT 1049.72 CONTk%CTUAL 8AULING & RESTC~AT 107.55 1307.27 02465 ROTARY L0~CE CLUB OF MOU~ PROSPECT ~EESHIP 247.00 04530 SAM'S CLUB ~IXBEESHIP 30.00 04673 Slgl BEk~A~DINO COO~Y CHILD SUPPORT PAYY~S PAYROLL FOR - 082400 211.85 02495 SAY~ CC~PNTRE SO0~CE HP TURNER 707.40 C~PNTRE REPAIR 227.38 934.78 05210 SC~L~3AMZER, BPJA~ OVERPAYMENT 27.00 02525 SECRETLY OF STATE RERE%%L NOTARY RE lO.00 00125 SEIU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL ~OR - 082400 484.50 02536 S~V~NTEEN SPECIALTIES INC. RESIDENT INFO BAGS 350.63 RESIDENT INFO BAGS 350.63 10-BADGES PIN BACK 75.13 NTON~WA~E M~G 455.44 1231.83 02542 SBEPP PEST CONTROL SERVICE 295.00 02559 SIRCEIE FINGER PRINT ~ABORAFOR SUPPLIES 144.57 04139 STANARE & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 1750.00 05215 STEACY, PA~ TAX REBATE 704.00 05226 STE~AL, LEROY REBATE 140.00 02658 SUBU~A~ PRESS SUPFLIES 407.00 02661 SUBU~A~ TRIM & GLASS CO. SE~ICE 205.40 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: THURSDAY AUG31U0 lhll PAGE 10 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF RILLS PRESWNTED TO TRE BOAR/) OF TRUSTEES WNOM AU~ST tl 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTIO~ ................................................................................................................................. 04532 T~.YLUN RENTAL CENTER CONTRACT 737.00 02680 TREETRAC, INC. SERVICE 1134.00 02684 TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY AIR FILTER & REGULATOR 172.47 02691 TEC~PSON ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS SERVICE 60.00 02692 TECSPSON PUBLISHING GROUP INC. SUPPLIES 279.00 05229 THOUREON, TERRY REBATE 105.00 05157 T~VEREA, VITO REBATE 287.00 02722 TE-STATE ELECTRONIC CORP ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 32.88 05243 ~=TRA%~D SERVICE INC. SODA MACHINE REPAIR 60.00 02744 UNDER~ITERE LABORATORIES INC. SAFETY INSPECTION 600.00 02756 ~!TED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NEWSLETTER 28U9.0T POSTAGE 3000.00 5809.07 00127 ~ITED WAY PAYROLL FOR - 082400 393.50 02769 UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY BAKERY PART !46.42 02801 VIKIRE OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES 76.94 SUPPLIES S9.93 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES !!4.50 2E1.37 00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 082400 17026.16 CASE OVER 4/29/00 i26.00 17T52.16 043!4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PNOSPFTT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 082400 !34~9L47 PAYROLL FOR - 082400 18438.48 PAYROLL FOR - 082400 12394.06 PAYROLL FOR - 082700 58.96 165668.94 02819 VITA~ RETORE BAWC, INC. MICROFI~ING SERVICES 4230.65 02821 VOW REiESEN, PUNTELL&ROPER, S .C. SERVICES 13203.64 02834 ~£L STREET JOURNAL WALL ST JOUk~AL SUBSC. !70.00 02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT SUPPLIES 22.98 SUPPLIES 18.90 41.88 SPORT: APBOARDRFt GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: THUNSDAY ANG3100 11:11 PAGE 11 REREASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRUSPECT LIST OF BILLS PI~E~E~ED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUN AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 DEFt ~F~gDOR N~R VUNDOR ~ ItNOtCE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT 02844 ~aI~GUA~D LONG SLEEVE EEIFtS 54.78 02848 WEILER AkE~DR, INC. RETAINAGE FEE 532.00 02893 WOLF CANERA, INC. PHOTO PROCESSING 52.54 FII~t 657.88 PI{OTO PROCESSING 22.41 PHOTO PROCESSING 12.96 PEOTO PROC~SING 26.00 772.59 05230 ~UNA, UNILY RE~ATE 175.00 00464 ~LBECKER, JUFFREY SUPERSTAN REFEREES 320.00 02901 WDLEECRER, JEFFREY A. SUPE~T~ ROAD I~-3,LY 139.03 02903 XEROX CORPUNATIUN TONER 209.98 02232 YIM, KI WAN R/E TRANSFER TAX DEBATE 420.00 TOTAL 440951.01 02016 A~C DISPOSAL CUNPANY JULY COLLECTIONS 51630.58 UNLY COLLECTIONS 19878.68 JULY COLLECTIONS 31112.45 JULY COLLECTIONS 2922.82 JULY COLLECTIONS 10192.0i JULY COLLECTIONS 14355.00 130091.54 02270 AT&T SRVICE 4.04 TOTAL 130095.58 050 95223 BEUN PAUN/~E..~ CRACK S~LING DROCPAM 34615.68 05233 MIKE & SONS CONS~RUCTIO~ REMOV~ & REBUILD ENTRANCE 1250.00 02624 STATE TREASURER TRAFFIC SIGNAL ~2NT. 3192.18 TOTAL 39057.86 O7O 04007 CON~Y, NANCY SIEglER ADVUNTU~ SUPPLIES 500.00 00335 FOLEY, APRIL B. REI~U~UNENT 140.75 D2052 MORA}I, }~IUNANL J. PDUNSSIONAL SEP31CES 250.00 PRO~$SIONAL SERVICES 170.50 420.50 REPORT: ARMOAROBPT GENERATED: I APR 00 19:23 RUN: THUNSDAY AUG3100 11:11 PAGE 12 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOONT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES F~ AUGUST tl 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 OE~T UNMOOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DERORIP~ION RMO~ 05242 U.S. PAVING PAVING WORK 3562.00 TOTAL 4623.25 290 04324 BAMK ONE AGENT F~E 300.00 TOTAL 300.00 510 01302 A~UNIDGE SLE~RIC, INC. HERITAGE UNIV~ STRK~ LIGHTING 2635.00 04615 FRANK C. CLUE, PRINCIPAL ~ PROSPECT CORPJPOR DESI~ 4600.00 TOTA~ 7235.00 55O 01147 CO~O~EALTE EDISON SERVICE 17.88 02521 SDI CONSDLTA.%~S LTD. SERVICES 4713.I6 RAILROAD DEPOT 240.32 4953.48 4971.36 590 02476 E~TH TECH INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50150.29 50150.29 610 01000 ACTIUN FENCE CONTRACTORS, INC. FANCE REPAIH 2500.00 04391 AL~AMDEN CHS~ICAL CYLINDER 90.00 05222 kMER/CAN INDUSTRIAL ~IPORM RENTAL & CLF2~NING 125.06 UNIFORM RE~AL & CLEANING t17.50 243.36 04771 AMERICAN WATER WORK~ ASSOC. BOOK 58.75 022~0 AT&T SERVICE 269.59 02451 BADGER METER INC 25 RHGISTENS/METER 721.01 ~TER METER 401.38 WATER M~TER 8695.00 9817.39 05004 ROESCRE, ~IN NYD~AMTS PAI~ED 200.00 02938 BOWF~ DISTRIBOTPON CENTER NTSC,AUTO PARTS 344.24 01097 CINTAS CO~? UNIPOEN RE~AL/CAMANING 350,76 'WEPORT: APBOARDP, PT GUNE~TED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: THURSDAY AUG3100 11:11 PAGE I3 RELE~E ID : VIL~GB OF MOUN~ VEOSPEOT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUN AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGI]NT 31 2000 RENT VENDOR NRA VENDOR NAWE INVOICE DESCRIPTIUN ANORET 01313 DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC. RESTORATION SUPPLIES 7/00 495.00 05127 ELEMENT K JOURNALS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 99.00 05047 ELGIN SWEEPING SERVICES, INC. CONTRACTUAL CLEANING 940.00 01436 FREDRIRSRE & SONS RECHANGE ~TIHU. 42.00 04991 G & M INC. CONCRETE RESTORATION 1922170 05217 GREER, MAI{['-.RET REFOND 22.16 REFUND 2.31 24.47 01544 HBK WATER PLiTRA SERVICE ~BOR & M,~TERIALS 884.14 LABOR & MATERIALS 512.74 LABOR & KATWEIALS 3549.88 4946.76 05218 HUMMING, DCNAtD R. REFUND 12.80 REFOND 1.35 14.15 01896 J.C. LICIT C~PANY MISC.PAili?iNG SUPPLIES 559.66 01427 JOSEPH D. DP, I~IAN & CO. TOOLS 42.14 MISSION COUPLINGS 90.36 MIRSIUN COUPLING ChOY 12t.00 SUPPLIES 1526.00 1779.50 01787 ~LIE, INC. SERVICE CHAI{GRE 315.20 01872 ~ATTOF CFZEVROLET, INC. RE~TAL OF 5 CARS 5490.00 01918 LUMDSTR~' S HUREERY MOWING 240,02 00403 O'OONOVAN, ROO~RICK CLOTHING ALLOW 300.00 02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL AND SUPPLIES 60.00 TRAVEL AND SUPPLIES 19.06 79.06 02008 RO~ER MEYER & SON CONTRACTUAL HAULING & RESTORAT 659.6! CONTRA~UA~ ~ULIHU & RESTORAT 1290.50 1950.11 02536 REVER~E~N £PECIALTIRS INC. RREID~T INFO BAGS 350.63 0252~ SERER E~!P~NT CO. OF kMERICA SUPPLIES t025.1! REPORT: APBOAPJRPT GENERATED: I APR 00 t9:23 RUN: TEUREDAY AUG3100 t1:11 PAGE 14 RELEASE ID : VIL~AER OF MO~3NT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNLM AUGUST 1t 2000 TO AU~ST 31 2000 DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR ~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION AROLMT 02575 SNAP-UN iNDUST~i TOOLE 141.71 SAC~S 198.96 340.67 04838 TNID MILLENNILM ASSOC.INC. WATER BIKING SERVICE 1429.47 02775 USA BLUEBOOK FLAG ~AERIER 109.48 05216 U~C LICENSE RE,Eh'AL 325.00 02832 ~-~RT STORES, INC. CAMERA SUPPLIES 200.92 02893 WOLF CAMERA, INC. FILM & PROCESSING 28.34 TOTAL : 36881.34 630 02754 LMION PACIFIC ~EROAD LAND LEASE-JO%Y t021.17 02806 VIL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SERVICE t8.50 TOTAL : 1039.67 660 02955 ALME TRUCK BEARE E SUPPLY CO. ANTO SPECIALTY ROTOR 316.80 02270 AT&T SERVICE 15.15 02938 BOO,lAN DISTEIBL~iON CENTRE MISC.ANTO PANTS 623.51 -' 01006 BUSSE CAR WASH, iNC. CAR ~SNES-ACCT3400 918.75 01049 CDW GOVERN~IE~, iNC COLOR PHOTOCONDUCTOR KIT 313.64 04579 CUST~ VEHICLE 5YSTL~S, INC. NE~OVE & REPLACE C~POTERS 15.00 REi~OVE ~ NEP~ACE CC~POT~ 300.00 315.00 01866 k%~Y ROESCH FOP~ CAP OIL FILLER 9.76 01872 ~TTOF CHEVRC'_?i, INC. MISC.AUTO PA.~IS 889.18 MISC.AOTO PARTS 90.00 979.18 02059 MORTON GROVE ~.~.O~OTIRE h~ST RISC.AUTO REPAIR SUPPLIES 540.00 02305 PETTY CARE - P~LIC WORKS TRAVEL AND SUPPLIES 20.96 TRAVEL AND SUPLIES 43.39 64.35 0237~ QUALITY D!SCOU~?. AUTO PARTS MISC.AUTO PAN?S 994.99 ~RT: APBOABDRPT G~RATED: 1 APR O0 19:23 RUN: THURSDAY AUG3100 11:1I PAGE 15 RELF.~E ID : NT~I~ OF NOUNT PEOSPECT LIST OF EtL~S PRUSENTED TO THE BOABD OF TRUSTEES ~ AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 DE~T VENDOR NBR ~DOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~OUNT ................................................................................. . ................................................. 02661 S~U~!~ TRIM & GLASS CO. REPAIR 120.50 02782 %TiVOLINE, INC. MOTOR & HYDEAULIC OIL 5655.86 TOTAL 10875.49 690 02927 RDES~, J~ FEPAi~ 575.00 01102 C 2T IfZ.~'K, N.A. INS.CLAIMS-GAB 7750.16 01306 DP,US TAD, INC. PRESCRIPTION CArD CLAIMS 10277.20 PRESCP, IPTION CARD CLAIMS 10766.41 21043.6I 02624 STAT"- TRP.$UREE WOEREFE CUNP I236.09 TOTAL 30604.86 710 01027 ~IT.~ GAINS INC, INVMS~NT M~fLAUGUST 2179,00 05037 5.'-3~ BANK NA ASSET ~OLDING FEE 243.75 01868 ~ :ALL, E NATIONAL BM~K SA~7,,EPING ~ES-DOLICE !0!2.22 00120 1%DLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR ~ 002900 0002.95 04314 7SL%SE OF NOUH PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 082900 160!3.16 TOTAL 29051.08 720 01027 CAPL~ GAINS INC. INVEST MGNT.AUGUST 2754.00 05037 L.z.S.z. LLE BANK NA ASSET HOLDING ~E 262.50 01868 iaB.z22,E NATIONAL BANK SAFEEEPING ~ES-FtRE 1202.68 00!27 '.'iLL-.SE C'F MOUNT PRESPECT PAYROLL FOR - 082800 04314 'CL%C:E OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYEOLL FOE - 082800 13975.55 TOTL% 26652.84 730 00128 71LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 002700 344.28 04314 VIT~AFE OF MO~INT PROSPEC? - PAYROLL WI~S PAYROLL FOR - 082700 200.00 TOTAl 544.28 790 04637 CR~STO~ ELECTRIC RE~D 300.00 05~0¢~ '^=~..'=~,.,, W!LLI~3! BOND FE~ND 75.00 KEFOET: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 NON: T~UREDAY AUG3100 lhll PAGE 16 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TRE BOARE OF TRUSTEES FR~ AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGDST 31 2000 DE~T V~NDOR NBR ~DO~ NA~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00121 FIRST NATIONAL BA~K OF CBICAGO SAVINGS BONDS 250.00 05239 ~O{~ES, ~ATT & LAOREN REFOND 50.00 05227 KONZYK, JA~ REFOND 375.00 05235 OLS~, DANYEL~ OVERPAYMENT i2.00 05213 P~JDE BEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CO., INC. OVERPAYMENT !7.50 05199 SA~WAY iNC. CREDIT REFOND 3400.00- REFUND 3{00.00 0.00 02689 THIRD DISTRICi CIRCUIT COURT BOND MO~EY 32i6.00 BOND MONEY i600.00 BOND MONEY 3413.00 BOND MONEY 18!7.00 BOND MONEY 2350.00 12396.00 00128 VILLAGE OF MOO~T PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 082700 6897.08 DISBORE~ 18106. O0 25003.09 TOTAL : 36478.59 GRAND TOTAL : 851512.50 G~NERATED: 1 APR 00 19:23 RUN: THURSDAY AUG3100 11:11 PAGE 17 ~E ID : VIL~GE OF M~ ~ROSPE~ LIST OF BIL~ P~SE~ED TO T~E ~AD OF TRUSTEES ~ AUGUST 11 2000 TO AUGUST 31 2000 S~Y BY ~D 001 GENE~ ~D 440951.01 030 ~$E DIS~AL ~D 130095.58 050 M~OR ~EL T~ ~D 39057.86 070 C~ITY D~L~ BL~K G~ 4623.25 290 ~ ~D~ B & I 1999 300.00 510 CAPIT~ ~PR~ ~D 7235.00 550 ~ ~D~P~ C~ST 4971.36 590 ~D CO~ROL CONST ~D 50150.29 610 WATER ~D S~R ~D 36881.34 630 P~ING SYST~ ~E ~D 1039.67 660 ~ICLE ~I~EN~CE ~D 10875.49 690 RISK W~AG~NT ~D 30604.86 710 POLICE P~SI~ ~D 29051.08 720 FI~ P~SI~ ~ND 26652.84 730 BENEFIT TRUST 92 ~D 544.28 790 ESCR~ DEP~IT ~D 38478.59 T~AL: 851512.50 PROCLAMATION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK SEPTEMBER 17 - 23, 2000 WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce works with the business community to advance the civic, industrial, professional and cultural welfare of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WltEREAS, chambers of commerce have contributed to the economic life of Ill'mois for 162 years since the founding of the Galena Chamber of Commerce in 1838; and WItEREAS, the State of Illinois is home to international chambers of commerce, the Great Lakes Regional Office of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Illinois State Chamber of Commerce and more than 350 local chambers of commerce; and WHEREAS, the chamber of commerce encourages the growth of existing industries, memhants and services, and encourages'new finns and individuals to locate in the Village of Mount Prospect; and WltEREAS, this year marks the 85~' anniversary of the Illinois Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives, a career development organization for chamber of commerce professional managers. NOW, TIIEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, proclaim September 17 through September 23, 2000 as CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK in the Village of Mount Prospect and I call its significance to the citizens of the Village i of Mount Prospect. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 50' day of September, 2000. PROCLAMATION LAWSUIT ABUSE AWARENESS WEEK September 18-23, 2000 WI:IEREAS, local units of government, including cities, townships, counties, schools, and park districts, are supported by tax dnilars provided by the citizens of their community; and ' WHEREAS, local units of government around Illinois are believed to have "deep pockets" because &their ability to raise taxes; and WHEREAS, personal injury lawyers have made local units of governmant an ever increasing target of lawsuits because of"deep pockets"; and WHEREAS, local units of government often have to raise taxes to defend themselves against lawsuits and pay settlements; and WHEREAS, over 250,000 lawsuits are filed aunually in Illinois, or one lawsuit is filed every two minutes; and WHEREAS, the taxpayers who support local units of government ultimately pay for the avalanche of lawsuits thi'ough higher taxes and lost or limited services; and WHEREAS, it is estimated the average Illinois taxpayer pays $1,200 a year in higher taxes and higher prices because of lawsuit abuse; and WHEREAS, like-minded IlIinois citizens have formed a coalition called Illinois Lawsuit Abuse Watch (I-LAW) to fight frivolous lawsuits and reform Illinois' lawsuit system; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the week of September I8-23, 2000 as LAWSUIT ABUSE AWARENESS WEEK in the Village of Mount Prospect, and I encourage all the citizens in Mount Prospect to support efforts to ensure faimes~s and responsibility in our courts. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: ve~n~ w. ~owe Village Clerk Dated this 5t~ day of September, 2000. PROCLAMATION NATIONAL PROSTATE CANCER AWARENESS MONTH WHEREAS, in the year 2000, the month of September is declared National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, and; WItEREAS, in the year 2000, approximately 180,000 men in the United States will learn that they have prostate cancer and, across the nation, prostate cancer is the most eommoniy diagnosed non-skin cancer in men; and WItEREAS, approximately 32,000 men will lose their lives to this disease this year, and one in six man in the nation are at risk of developing prostate cancer during their lifetimes; and WHEREAS about 25 percent of prostate cancer occurs in men under the age of 65, during their prime years at work; and WHEREAS, at any age, pmstate cancer devastates families, through loss of income, parmership and support; and WHEREAS, African American families are disproportionately affected, and African American men have the highest prostate cancer incidence and mortality rotes in the world; and WHEREAS, prostate cancer has accounted, on average, for 15 percent of the nation's cancer burden and 15 percent of male cancer deaths; and WHEREAS, research suggests that men would reduce their risk of prostate cancer mortality if they followed recommended prostate cancer screening guidelines, including examination by a health care provider; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the month of September as NATIONAL PROSTATE CANCER AWARENESS MONTIt in the Village of Mount Prospect, and urge all men in the Village of Mount Prospect to become aware of their own risks of prostate cancer, talk to their health care providers about prostate cancer, and whenever appropriate, get screened for the disease. I further encourage all residents to become involved in the war on prostate cancer. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 5th day of September, 2000. Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~1~-~,,~, FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: AUGUST 11, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-24-2000 - CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION FOR A CITGO 630 W. RAND ROAD (SW CORNER OF RAND AND EUCLID) JOHN KOUCHOUKOS - APPLICANT PETE & KOULA LOURAS - PETITIONERS The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use to permit establishment of a 3,250 square-foot Citgo Gas Station/convenience mart and a variation to construct a canopy in a required setback. The proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their July 27, 2000 meeting. The ZBA discussed lighting requirements, hours of operation, screening from the adjacent residential properties, and building materials. At the conclusion of their consideration, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Conditional Use request to permit a Citgo Gas Station/convenience mart and a variation for a canopy to encroach 8-feet into the 30-foot setback with the following conditions of approval: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Place Associates dated June 23, 2000 (Attachment 1). 2. Submission of a final landscape plan in general conformance with the preliminary site plan prepared by Place Associates, dated July 18, 2000: a. revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning Ordinance; b. revised to provide evergreen bushes at a 3' height along Euclid and Rand Roads and four evergreen trees ata minimum height of 6' along the east elevation of the building. 3. Development of the building in general conformance with elevations prepared by Place Associates dated July 18, 2000. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their August 15th meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. Cooney, Jr., AICP /Ds MINUTES OF ~i'HE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING. BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-24-2000 Hearing Date: July 27, 2000 PETITIONER: Pete &'Koula Louras PUBLICATIONDATE: July 12, 2000 DAILY HERALD REQUEST: Conditional Use to construct a Citgo station and a Variation to construct a canopy, which would extend into a setback 1VIEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotton Leo Flores Elizabeth Luxem Richard Rogers Keith Youngqmst Arlene Juracek, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF' MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Marjorie Bajgabek Dan Duranso Ssi & Connie Rizzo Lester Kelley A. Rogers Burton Von Wetering Joe & Helen Zirko Chairperson Arlene Jumeek called the meeting to Order at~ 7:34 p.m. Minutes of the June 22, 2000 meeting were appro;ced, Merrill Cotte~i and Richard R~gers' abstained ~r0m voting. At 8:00, after hearing two other cases. Ms. Juracek opened Case ZBA-24-2000, a request for a Conditional Use to construct a Citgo station and a Variation m construct a canopy that would encroach into a setback Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the item, a Condi~itnal use to Construct a Citgo s~ation and a Variation to construct a canopy that would extend eight-feet into ~ 302foot setbhek. Ms. Connolly then informed th6 Zoning Board tha~the caSe would be Village Board final. Ms. Connolly summarized the ease. She stated that the subject property is a vacant gas station at the southeast comer of Rand and Euclid Roads, south of the Creekside condominium development, adjacent to single family residential and across the stceet from a Mobile gas'station. She said that the petitioners plan to raze de existing structure and construct a 3,250 square foot Citgo convenience store and gas station with six gas pumps. She said that the site is currently accessed from two driveways on Rand Road and two driveways on Euclid Road. The petitioners plan to eliminate one dri-4/eWay from each street frontage and locate 'the new driveways away' from the intersection of Rand and Euclid Roads; toWards the middle Of the Property. Ms. Connolly explained that the petitioner is seeking a variation to allow the canopy, which covers the gas pumps, to encroach into the required 30-f°ot sethaek along Rand Road by 8 feet. The petitioners said that the irregular shape of the lot is a hardship.that makes it difficult to keep the canopy within the required 30-foot setback and provide shelter while peopl~ are g~ttinggas. She said that staff reviewed ~e petitioner's plat of Survey and site plan and Visited the site. Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA~24-2000 Arlene Juracek. Chairperson ~ Page 2 Ms. Connolly reported that the proposed structure would be constructed of brick and concrete block with a flat roof. large windows, and pre-finished metal panels above the windows at the top of the building. She said the proposed building is brick on three sides and concrete block on one side. She said that. while this fulfils the ZBA and Village Board policy of requiring masonry construction for new buikdings in the Village, the concrete block elevation is across from the backyards of single famil3 residences. Ms. Connolly described the parcel for the proposed Conditional Use as a vacant Shell gas station aloug a commercial corridor. She said that the applicant proposes to establish a heW Citgo convenience store and gas station similar to the previous use. She noted that revising the landscape plan te proyjde an enhanced buffer for the adjacent residences should allow little or no negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provismn or public streets in the area She said that the proposed Conditional Use would comply with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements with the exception of the canopy. She pointed out that the Rand Road Corridor Plan calls for eliminating curb cuts where possible to improve the safety and flow of traffic. The petitioners' proposal includes this provision and the proposed Conditional Use and Variation would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. Ms. Connolly explained that the proposed Conditional Use and Variation will meet the reqmred standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance, when the staffs recommended conditions of approval have been met. She said that, based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend approval of the proposed Conditional Use to permit tbe establishment of a Citgo convenience store and gas station,and variation to locate a canopy 8-feet into the required 30- foot setback at 630 W. Rand Road. Case No. ZBA-24-20 )0. Ms. Juracek asked Judy if the 25' setback on the easr side of the pmper~y is the legally mandated setback and if they are building right up against it. Ms. Connolly responded it was and that when commercial property abuts residential the commercial development must adopt the more stringent setback~ Richard Rogers asked if the old tanks had been removed. Ms. Conn611y said they had been removed but she did not know if the soil had been cleaned-up. Merrill Cotten asked if the curbcuts would be the same as the existing ones. Ms. Connolly said they were different; they.are narrower and allow for.better ingress/egress to the s'ite. The petitioner will need to obtain IDOT approval for the curbcuts. John Kouchoukos, 3518 S. Sunnyside in Brookfield. was sworn in and said that he was the amhitect for the project, representing the owners Pete and Koula Louras. He said that they did the best they could to design the site according to code requirements, but they had a problem conformir~g to the 25' setback. They tried to do everything possible to make the ~ite attractive and he presented the landscape~plan. Since there are residential neighbors behind 'them they placed the buildifig where i/: would block the canopy light} 'Als0. there will be a 6 fence and landscape screening to provide a buffer. The owners will manage the station with their family and want to be good neighbors. Ms. Juracek said this was probably the best-landscaped gaS station the ZBA has seen and that the only Variation appears to be a comer of the canopy. John Koueh0~kos said they are asking for a little less than.e!ght-foot setback 3'ariati0n because'there is not much building space find they are striving for better fundtion and an 'o~,erall aesthetically pleasing'development. Ms. Jumcek asked how high the canopy would be and Mr, Ko~lchoukos said that it would be 14' - 18' in height. Mr. Kouchoukos said there Would be a mini-mart and a coffee area with donuts inside the building. Mr. Rogers asked about the construction of masonry, metal panels, and asked if Dryvit would be used on the building. Mr. Kouchoukos said no Dryvit would be used. oning Board of Appeals ~< ??~ ~ ZBA-24-2000 Arlene Juracek. Chairperson Page 3 Mr. Rogers asked if underground tanks had been removed. Mr. Kouchoukos said they were and remediation of the soil was done. Mr. Floros said the setback variation for the canopy was a minimal request and should be approved. Burton Van Weddering, 710 Creekside Dr., Unit 504, was sworn in. He stated that he lived north ofthe property on the fifth floor. In past experience, he said that a searchlight shone in his bedroom window from the time he moved in until the station closed. He said he wanted assurances that there would be no lighting sprawl into their bedroom and asked if this would be a 24-hour operation. John Kouchoukos said they would use canopy lights and that those lights would not throw light past property lines, as required by the Village's revised lighting ordinance. They will not be a 24-hour operation at the beginning, but this may change later and become a 24 hour operation, depending on the level of business. Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval of the request for Variation and Conditional Use with the conditions listed in the staffmemo. Leo Floros seconded the motion. At 8:15, Chairperson Juracek closed the Public Hearing and asked for discussion from the Board. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Rogers. Yom~gquist, and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 6-0. At 10:06 p.m., Merrill Cotten made motion to adjourn, seconded b? Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary ~d~it~ lry, 'or ~r Proposed Citgo Gas Station & Convenience Store Rand Road & Euclid Avenue (Southeast Corner) Mount Prospect, IL July 18~. 2000 Index Sheet 1 of 8: Land Survey Sheet 2 of 8: Preliminary Site Plan Sheet 3 of 8: Prelhninary Engineering Sheet 4 of 8: Prelhninary Landscape Plan Sheet 5 of 8: Cross Section at Rear Property Line Sheet 6 of 8: Prel'nninary Floor Plan Sheet 7 of 8: Prelhninary Elevations Sheet 8 of 8: Prelhninary Elevations ALTA / ACSM L~'~D TITLE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON VWL 8/7/00 8/8/00 ORDINANOE NO. AN ORDINANOE GRANTING A OONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION8 FOR PROPERTY KNOWN A8 630 WEST RAND ROAD WHEREAS, Pete and Koula Louras (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner")have filed a petition for a Conditional Use and Variation with respect to property located at 630 West Rand Road, (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 7 (except that part falling within the lands in deeds recorded as Documents 10155705, 10294767, and 11113038) in Block 1 in Arlington Meadows, being a subdivision of that part of the West half of the Southwest quarter lying North Easterly of the center line of Rand Road in Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to construct a 3,250 square foot gas station with convenience mart, as provided in Section 14.1703 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation from the front setback requirement of thirty feet (30'), as provided in Section 14.1704.A.1 of the Village Code, to allow a landscape setback of twenty-two feet (22') for the construction of a canopy; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use and Variation being the subject of ZBA Case No. 24-2000 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of July, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 12th day of July, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 24-2000; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit and Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. Page 2/3 630 W. Rand Road NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit to allow the construction of a 3,250 square foot gas station with convenience mart, as provided in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code; and SECTION THREE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code, to reduce the thirty foot (30') front setback requirement to construct a canopy, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit '%." SECTION FOUR: Pdor to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use permit and Variations, the following conditions and/or written documentation shall be fulfilled: 1. Development of the site in conformance with the site plan prepared by Place Associates, dated June 23,~ 2000 (Attachment 1). 2. Submission of a final landscape plan in conformance with the preliminary landscape plan prepared by Place Associates, dated July 18, 2000; a. revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning Ordinance; b. revised to provide evergreen bushes at a three foot (3') height along Euclid and Rand Roads and four evergreen trees at a minimum height of six feet (6') long the east elevation of the building. 3. Development of the building in general conformance with elevations prepared by Place Associates dated July 18, 2000. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. Page 3/3 630 W, Rand Road SECTION FIVE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ., 2000. Gerald L. Farley President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\G EN\file$\WIN\O RDINANC\C USE, VAR. 630 W R~nd, CITGO GAS.doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Q,~.~ ~ ...... DATE: AUGUST 11,2000 ~ ~ (~r[-) . SUBJECT: ZBA-05-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MODIFY THE CR CONSERVATIO~ RECREATION ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - APPLICANT The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Text Amendments to Sections 14.701, 14.702, 14.703, 14.704, and 14.705, comprising tile CR Coaservation Recreation Zoaing District. Tile Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their July 27, 2000 meeting. The proposed text amendments to the CR District were reviewed by the Zoning Board earlier tbis 3'ear and a recommendation was forwarded to the Village Board in Marcia. At that time. Village Board members raised questions about notice procedures. Since then the notice requirements have beea clarified and the CR text amendment was noticed according to new publication requirements. The Community Development Department has reviewed several recent building permit applications from local park districts that have been in conflict with the current CR zoning district. The CR District currently requires that all improvements permanently affixed to the ground to be set back 50' from all property lines. Those setback requirements make it difficult for park districts to provide needed facilities. The Mt. Prospect Park District is in the process of working with residents of neighborhoods surrounding existing parks to develop master plans for those parks. Staff from the Village and local Park Districts undertook a comprehensive review of existing and needed facilities in local parks to determine appropriate regulations to provide for adeqnate park facilities and minimize impacts on adjacent residential properties. This includes the proposed 10-foot setback previously discussed by the Village Board. The Park Districts' internal review and long range plans for bali fields minimized the need to increase setback requirements since existing facilities with similar setbacks had no history of accidents. The proposed text amendment changes are described in the attached ZBA staffmemo. The ZBA briefly discussed the proposed Amendments in terms of the Zoning Code Standards for Text Amendments and voted 6-0 to recommend approval of tl~e proposed Amendments, Case No. ZBA-05-2000. william J. Cooney Jr., AICP /b$ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-05-2000 Hearing Date: July 27.2000 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect PUBLICATION DATE: July 12. 2000 DAILY HERALD REQUEST: Text Amendments to the CR Conservation Recreation Zoning District MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Leo FIoros Elizabeth Luxem Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Arlene Juracek, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Judy Connolly~ AICP, Senior Planner LNTERESTEI) PARTIES: None Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. Minutes of the June 22. 2000 meeting were approved, Merrill Cotten and Richard Rogers abstained from voting. At 7:35, Ms. Juracek opened Case ZBA-05- 2000, proposed Text Amendments to the CR Conservation Recreation Zoning District, and stated that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given, and introduced the staff memorandum for the item, Text Amendments to the CR Conservation Recreation Zoning District. She explained that this text amendment had been heard by the ZBA prior to another text amendment that changed the noticing requirements for public hearings. This case has been re-noticed according to those requirements and is being submitted for the ZBA's review. Ms. Connolly then summarized the text amendment, and noted that local Park Districts had input on the CR District. When originally draRed in 1993, the CR District section did not take into consideration the existing equipment and structures, which made it difficult for Park Districts to meet required setbacks. The text amendment clarifies and reorganizes structure definitions, addresses permitted uses, and creates Conditional Uses for lighted ball fields. The lot coverage requirement is not changed and building height limit is not changed. It makes provision for other structures, i.e., light poles, backstops, etc., to be up to 60' in height. Permitted obstructions include bike paths, sidewalks, jogging trails, and similar facilities UP to 10' in width (which is wider than current code requirements). The proposed amendments apply to all CR parcels and are consistent with the purpose oftbe CR District. It minimizes existing non- conformities and does not create new non-conformities. The proposed changes meet standards for text amendment, therefore staff recommends approval. Arlene Juraeek asked if this Text Amendment'contained any changes from the previous proposal. Ms. Connolly said no, there had been discussion about the 19' sideyard setback by the Village Board and that staff reviewed possible changes and discussed then with Park District representatives. She said it is staffs understanding that ball fields are built ~fter internal review by the Park District to have no impact on adjacent properties. Ms. Connolly said there are no plans to change existing parks and ball fields. Ms. Juracek asked if Zoning Board members had questions for Judy. She also asked if any audience members had come to address the Board in this matter. oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 35-2000 Arlene Juracek. Chairperson Page 2 At 7:40, Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for the proposed Text Amendments. Elizabeth Luxem seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten. Floros. Luxem, Rogers. Youngquist. and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 6-0. At 10:06 p.m.. Merrill Cot~en made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary ~udy C°nh~l~~ eltfi'Or'l~lanner ~ Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK. CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY. AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: JULY 20, 2000 HEARING DATE: JULY 27, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-05-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MODItry REGULATIONS FOR THE CR CONSERVATION RECREATION ZONING DISTRICT. BACKGROUND INFOILMATION PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 REQUESTED ACTIONS: A. Modify Article 14.7 CR Zoning District as follows: ARTICLE VII CR CONSERVATION RECREATION DISTRICT SECTION: 14.70l. Purpose 14.702. Permitted Uses 14.703. Conditional Uses 14.704. Bulk Regulations 14.705. Landscaping Sec. 14.701. Purpose. The CR District ~s intended to provide for the location of public parks, golf courses, swimming pools, community facilities, and other open space uses or resources to serve the recreational needs of the citizens of the Village. (Ord. 4590, 9-21-93) Sec. 14.702. Permitted Uses. In the CR Conservation Recreation district, the only uses wtf~ch may hereafter be established are: A. Parks and playgrounds. ZBA-05-2000 Text Amendments ZBA Meeting of July 27, 2000 Page 2 B. Unliehted Ballfields D. Tennis courts, swimmint pools, and similar recreational actMties. E. Namrepres~ation areas. F. Accesso~ usez and baiIdings, s~cmres incidental to and on the same zoning lot as the pe~ined use,: G. IVireless se~ice facilities shall be pemai~ed as set forth in Section 14.313E of this Chapter (Ord. 4590, 9-21-93; Ord. 4925, 4-21-98) Sec. 14.703. Conditional Uses. The tbllowing uses may be allowed by condinonal use issued m accordance w~th the provisions of subsection 14.203F of this Zoning Ordinance: A. Recreational complexes, conse~atories ~ studios, museums. ~ co~uniW centers and similar institutions. B. Lighted Ballfields C. Pla~ed developments in confomance ~vith ~icle V of this Chapter. D. Detention or retention facilities E. Accesso~ ....... ~ ................ ~, s~c~es incidental to and on the same zoning lot as the conditional use:: Sec. 14.704. Bulk Regulations. A. Yard Requirements: Buildings. ~y building er s,~ztar: hereaher constructed or relocated in the CR Dis~ict shall maintain minimum yards as follows: 1. All CR ~ned Prope~es Front v~d 50 feet Exterior side yard 50 feet 2. Prope~ lines abu~ng non-residential prope~ Btefior side yard Equal to ~e required setback in the adjacent dis~icr to the co~on prope~ line Rear yard Equal to the required setback in the adlacent dis~ict to the co~on prope~ line ZB.\-05-2000 Text Amendments ZBA Meeting of Jul5 27. 2000 Page 3 3. Property lines abutting residential prope~W Interior side yard 50 feet Rear yard 50 feet B. Yard Reqmrements: Other Structures. Any structure, other than a building, hereafter constructed or relocated in the CR District shall maintain minimum yards as follows: 1. All CR Zoned Properties Front yard 10 feet Exterior side yard 10 feet 3. Property lines abutting non-residential property Interior side yard 10 feet Rear yard 10 feet 2. ProperW lines abutting residential property Interior side yard 25 feet Rear yard 25 feet C. Lot Coverage. No lot in the CR District shall be developed with total m~perx'ious surfaces exceeding twenty five percent (25%). D. Height Limitations. I. No buildings or s~uct,ares shall exceed three (3) stories or thirty feet (30') in height, whichever is less. 2. No other structures shall exceed sixW feet (60') in height. E. Yard Rectuirements: No accesson, structure shall be located in a required yard of the CR District unless otherwise provided for in this section. F. Permitted Obsmaetions in Required Yards. Structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards in the CR District as follows: 1. Sidewalks, steps, bikepaths, and similar facilities up to ten (10) feet in width. 2. Driveways. 3. Eaves, storm gutters, chimneys, and bay windows extending into such yards not more than twenW- · ' ' four (24'1 inehes: Sec. 14.705. Landscaping A. Parking Lots and buildings in the CR district shall be landscaped accordin~ to the requirements of Article XXIII. ZBA-05-2000 Text Amendments ZBA Meeting of July 2-. 2000 Page 4 ANALYSIS As you recall, the proposed text amendments to the CR District were reviewed by the Zoning Board earlier this year and a recommendation was forwarded to the Village Board in March. At that time, there was a text antendment proposed that would clarify noticing requirements for text amendments. Village Board members requested that the CR text amendment be re-noticed. For your convenience, the text of the original staff report follows: The CR Conservation Recreation Zoning District was created in 1993 as a part of a comprehensive update of the Village's Zoning Code. The district replaced the then existing G Gotf Course designation and added all parks and conservation uses into the new district. A review of the Zoning case file from that case indicates that the several Park Districts in the Village did not have an opportunity to give input regarding the effects of the proposed district on their properties. The Community Developntent Department has reviewed several recent building permit applications from local park districts that have been in conflict with the current CR zoning district. The CR District currently lists a 50- foot setback for all structures in the district from all property lines. The Zoning Ordinance specifies that all improvements permanently affixed to the ground are considered to be structures and the list of structures that may encroach into setbacks is extremely limited. These requirements would require even minor structures, such as benches, play equipment, baseball backstops, and sidewalks xvider than the 3'-5' permitted in residential districts to meet the required .~0' setback. These requirements make it difficult for park districts to provide for necessary facilities, especially in small neighborhood parks such as Owen, Countryside, East Wedgewood, and West Wedgewood Parks. See the attached exhibit "A" for an illustration of the effects of current regulations on small neighborhood parks. The Mt. Prospect Park District is in the process of master planning and updating all of their parks. Preliminary reviews of proposed changes to the parks indicate that future plans for many parks developed by the park district, in consultation with area residents, would be impossible without numerous Variations. In the interests of facilitating the provision of needed recreational facilities in the Village, Village and Park District Staffs undertook a comprehensive review of existing and needed facilities in local parks to determine appropriate regulations to provide for adequate park facilities and minimize impacts on adjacent residential properties. The proposed changes are described in the following sections. PROPOSED CHANGES Permitted and Conditional Uses The existing list of uses has been modified and reorganized to better support the CR District purpose included in Section 14.701. The current regulations do not specify ballflelds, one of the most important uses in area parks, as a perrff~tted or conditional use in the District. The proposed text includes unlighted fields as permitted uses. Lighted fields are included as conditional uses because of their potential for impacts (parking, noise, etc.) on nearby properties. Tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar recreational activities were separated from golf courses due. to the very different natures of these uses. Finally the text regarding recreational complexes and similar uses was changed to focus more on recreational, rather than cultural and educational, facilities. ZBA-05-2000 Text :\mcndments ZBA Meeting of Jul3 27. 2000 Page 5 Bulk Regulations Yard Requirements: The CR District yard requirements are the most important issue addressed in the proposed text amendments. As previously mentioned, the current regulations require that all structures, including minor structures such as play equipment must meet a 50' setback from all property lines, The attached example shows the effect of the current and proposed regulations on one site, Owen Park. The current regulations make every improvement in the park non-conforming. The only area available for play equipment and other facilities that doesn't conflict with the existing baseball field is the small area beyond center field. The backstop for the baseball field also conflicts with the current regulations. The proposed regulations would allow for a much larger potential play area and most of the existing improvements for the existing baseball field while still allowing for a 25' setback to the abutting residential property. The effect would be similar for other neighborhood parks. Buildings, as defined by the zoning code. "Any structure permanently affixed to the ground, used or intended for supporting any use or occupancy," would still be regulated by the current 50' required setback from streets and residential properties. Required interior side and setbacks for park buildings abutting non-residential properties would be reduced to the required setback for that non-residential property. This would allow for use of a larger part of park sites in areas where there is httle chance of a negative effect on the adjacent properties, while still providing for the maximum protection for residential properties. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage requirements for CR zoned parcel would not be affected by this proposal. Height limits: The required height limit for buildings in the CR district would not change. The height limit for other structures in the district would be increased to 60'. This change would permit such structures as ballfield lights, backstops, and flagpoles to exceed the 30' height limit. Items such as flagpoles and backstops have very limited potential for impact on adjacent properties. Ballfield lighting does have some potential for neighborhood impact. However. increasing the height of poles allows lighting to be focused more directly onto the field, which will reduce the overspill of light onto adjacent properties. Permitted Obstructions: The proposed changes would allow for bike paths, sidewalks, jogging trails, and similar facilities, wider than the 3' to 5' width allowed by Section 14.306.E.4. Under the current regulations, a bike trail in a park would be limited to 3' (side) or 5' (front) in width for the first 50' adjacent to the public sidewalk and then widen to a more appropriate width interior to the site. Returning to the Owen Park example, the existing 7' sidewalk leading from Owen Street to the play area is in a side setback and would, therefore, be limited to 3' in width under the current regu!ations. Landscaping The proposed change requires that parking lots in parks be landscaped according to the requirements of the Village's Landscape Code. BA-05-2000 Text Amendments ZBA Meeting of July 27, 2000 Page 6 STANDARDS FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS Section 14.203.D.8.b lists standards for the ZBA to consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code. The standards relate to: the general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel; consistency of the amendment with objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan; the degree to which the amendment would create non-conformi~,; the degree to which the amendment would make the Zoning Code more permissive; and consistency of the amendment with Village policy as established by previous rulings. The proposed amendments apply to all parcels in the CR Zoning District and do not affect a particular parcel. The changes are intended to facilitate the provision of necessary recreational facilities in the Village. Thus, the proposed amendments are consistent with purpose statement of the CR Zoning District and Parks and Recreation Goals and Objectives included in Comprehensive Plan. The proposed changes are intended to minimize non- conformities and will not create any new non-conformity. The proposed changes would make the code somewhat more permissive. However the changes in that direction are intended to further Comprehensive Plan Objectives. In particular, the changes facilitate Parks and Recreation Objective 2 "Develop new recreational facilities and programs xvhich respond to the specific desires of Village residents." and Objective 5, "Utilize existing park and recreational facilities to the maximum." Thus. the amendments meet the Zoning Code Standards for Text Amendments. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Text Amendments in Section 14.203.D.8.b. Iherefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed Text Amendments. I Concur, William J."C~)oney, Jr.} AICP Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE MANAGER - ~l ,, FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY JR., DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DE~E~T DATE: AUGUST 31, 2000 SUBJECT: CR DISTRICT TEXT AMENDMENT Attached to this memorandum is a revised ordinance amending the CR zoning district text. The ordinance has been amended to reflect comments from the Village Board related to the potantial height of accessory structures in this district. As amended, the Ordinance would make all accessory structures that are taller than 30' conditional uses. This provision would allow the Village Board to review any proposal for structures over 30' in height on a case by case basis. As requested, the Mount Prospect Park District has arranged to have a lighting expert present at the September 5 meeting to discuss hallfield lighting. A representative from Northstar Electric, a company that has installed lighting in several local parks, will provide expertise on this subject. Northstar will also provide photometric drawings of ballfields that are lit by light poles of varying heights. In addition, the Village Board requested that staff determine where 60' tall light poles exist in the area. The Mount Prospect Park District has informed me that the lights at Meadows Park are 60' tall and have been in existence for several years. If the Village Board desires to view these lights in the evening, the Park District is willing to arrange a "viewing". Please forward this memorandum to the Village Board for their review and consideration at the September 5th meeting. Staff will be presant at that meeting to further discuss this matter. WilliamtJ. Cooney Jr. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VVHEREAS, the Petitioner (Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect) have filed an application for certain text amendments to Chapter 14 (Zoning) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to amend various regulations; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks amendments to the following Sections of the Village Code: Section 14.701 Purpose Section 14.702 Permitted Uses Section 14.703 Conditional Uses Section 14.704 Bulk Regulations Section 14.705 Landscaping VVHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the proposed amendments, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 05-2000, before the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 27, 2000, pursuant to due and proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 12~ day of July, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and positive recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given consideration to the requests being the subject of ZBA 05-2000. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: Section 14.701 entitled uPurpose" of Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: *The C-R District is intended to provide for the location of public parks, golf courses, swimming pools, community facilities, and other open space uses or resources to serve the recreational needs of the citizens of the Village;" SECTION THREE: Section 14.702 entitled "Permitted Uses" of Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "In the C-R Conservation Recreation district, the only uses which may hereafter be established are: A. Parks and playgrounds. B. Unlighted ball fields. Page 2/4 Text amendments C. Golf courses. D. Tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar recreational activities. .. E. Nature preservation areas. F. Accessory structures incidental to and on the same zoning lot as the permitted use. G. Wireless service facilities shall be permitted as set forth in Section 14.313.E. of this Chapter." SECTION FOUR: Section 14.703 entitled "ConditiOnal Uses" of Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the current Section 14.703 and adding a new Section 14.703, which shall read as follows: "The following uses may be allowed by conditional use issued in accordance with the provisions of subsection 14.203.F. of this Zoning Ordinance: A. Recreational complexes, conservatories, studios, museums, community centers and similar institutions. B. Lighted ball fields. C. Planned developments in conformance with Article V of this Chapter. D. Detention or retention facilities F. Accessory structures, incidental to, and on the same zoning lot as the conditional use." SECTION FIVE: Section 14.704 entitled "Bulk Regulations,' of Chapter 14. as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting SectiOn 14.704 and adding a new Section 14.704 which shall read as follows: "14.704~ BULK REGULATIONS: A. Yard Requirements: Buildings. Any building hereafter constructed or relocated in the C-R Distdct shall maintain minimum yards as follows: 1. All C-R zoned properties: Front yard 50 feet Extedor side yard 50 feet 2. Property lines abutting non-residential property'.' Interior side yard Equal to the required setback in the adjacent distdct to the common property line Rear yard Equal to the required setback in the adjacent distdct to the common property line 3. Property lines abutting residential property: I ntedor side yard 50 feet Rear yard 50 feet Page 3/4 Text amendments B, Yard Requirements: Other Structures. Any structure, other than a buildi~g~ hereafter constructed or relocated in the C-R District shall maintain minimum yards as follows: 1. All C-R zoned properties: Front yard 10 feet Exterior side yard 10 feet 2. Property lines abutting non-residential property: Intedor side yard 10 feet Rear yard 10 feet 3. Property lines abutting residential property: Intedor side yard 25 feet Rear yard 25 feet C. Lot Coverage: No lot in the C-R Distdct shall be developed with total impervious surfaces exceeding twenty-five percent (25%). D. Height Limitations:" 1. No bu~ld~nos~ or ..,..._..=.-_~ shall exceed...... ~, ......~ or thirty feet (30') in height-. ........ ¢ ....~s"~ ce ~s p. rescr.~6e~l~n. Sest on-:,1~,~0.3 . ~ceg., .................................. 2. Hc cthcr ctru~urcc cheil c×c~cd c!~.' fc~t (60,) !~ h~[~,ht. E. Yard Requirements: No accessory structure shall be located in a required yard of the C-R District unless otherwise provided for in this section. F. Permitted Obstructions in Required Yards. Structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards in the C-R District as follows: 1. Sidewalks, steps, bike paths, and similar facilities up to ten feet (10') in width. 2. Driveways. 3. Eaves, storm gutters, chimneys, and bay windows extending into such yards not more than twenty-four inches (24')." .. SECTION SIX: Section 14.705 entitled "Landscaping" of Chapter 14 (Zoning), is hereby created, and shall read as fellows: "A. Parking lots and buildings in the C-R District shall be landscaped according to the requirements of Article XXIII." Page 4/4 Text amendments SECTION SEVEN: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its pa~age, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of . ,2000. Gerald L. Fadey Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: AUGUST 11, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-23-2000 - MAP AMENDMENT- 791 W. RAND ROAD REZONE FROM RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL ZABEST COMMERCIAL GROUP - APPLICANT The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to deny a map amendment to establish a 23,000 square foot commercial development for a vacant lot located on Rand Road between Joe Mitchell Buick and Louis Anthony Hair Salon. The proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their July 27, 2000 meeting. The ZBA heard comment on and discussed the project in detail. Issues discussed included possible tenants for the site, the need for commercial or residential development along Rand Road, the history of the property, how the charaoter of Rand Road and the edjac~nt neighborhood have changed, and the potential impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhood. Residents presented their concerns pertaining to trash management, lighting, proposed building location, deliveries, and a desire to have townhomes instead of commercial development on the site. After lengthy discussion, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 4-2 to deny the proposed map amendment to rezone a vacant lot at 791 E. Rand Road from RI Single Family Residential to B3 Community Shopping. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and'consideration at their' August l$~meeting. Staffwillbepresenttoansweranyquestionsretatedtothismatter. Asuper majority vote is required for the Village Board to approve the map amendment request because the proposal did not receive a positive recommendation by the ZBA. ~~.~/~ "~{ ~' /~/,t~ ~ . William J. Cooney Jr., AICP MINUI'ES OF "I'u ~ REGULAR MEETING OF MOUNT PROSPEC~f ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-23-2000 Hearing Date: July 27, 2000 PETITIONER: Steve Nikolas / Larry LeMieux Zabest Commercial Group, Inc. 16800 W. Greenfield Ave. Brooki~eld, WI 53005 PUBLICATION DATE: July 12,2000DAILY HERALD REQUEST: Map Amendment:from R-1 to B-3 MEMJBERS PRESENT: Merrill C0tten Leo Floros Elizabeth Luxem Richard l~ogers Keith Youngquist Arlene Juraoelq Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Judy Connolly, AICP, SeniorPlanner INTERESTED PARTIES: Frank & Joan Auer Scott Burgess D. R: cannon Zenon & Susan'Golba Jerry & Nancy Itoward-Wallis Iver :Iverson Mr. & Mrs. Doug Johnson Ingrid Klingbeil Carlotta Kozak Larry LeMieux Phyllis Libreri Robert Lueas Mr. & Ivlrs. Raymond Lundin Mr. & Mrs. James Mahon Steven Nikolas Robin Rose Phil & Cheryl Santoro Jennifer Schmoldt Paul 8piewak Joe & Joyce Usery Shirley Weaver George & Patricia Ziegler Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. Minutes of the Ju~e 22, 2000 meeting were apprOVed, Merrill cOtten and Richard Rogers abstained from voting. At 8:20, af/er heating three other cases,. Ms. Juracek opened Case ZBA-23-2000, a request for a MaP A2mendment from R-1 to B-3, saying that staff and ZBA Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-23-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 members had received many letters expressing neighboring property owners' concerns regarding this case. She asked that several people act as spokespersons for the group to expedite the heating. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case, a request for a Map Amendment from R- 1 to B-3. Ms. Connolly then informed the Zoning Board that the case would be Village Board final. Ms. Connolly summarized the case by reporting that the subject property is a triangular-shaped vacant lot that fronts onto 'Rand Road. She said the site has never been developed and abuts a car dealership to the south, a hair salon to the north, and is across Louis Street from single famity residences. She said that the site is across Rand Road from commercial uses: Menard's, a fast food restaurant, and a bowling alley. She explained that the applicants propose to consolidate two lots to construct a 23,000 square~foot commercial development that would meet all Zoning and Development Code requirements. She' said Louis Street and Rand Road would be fully improved, which included dedicating right-of-way where applicable, installing sidewalks, streetlights, and interior parking lot lights per Village code. She noted that a plat of resubdivision consolidating the site into a one-lot subdivision would be prepared and reviewed by the Plan Commission and have to be approved by Village Board. She noted that the commercial development does not provide vehicle access from Louis Street. She said the parking lot is designed to allow access to the south property should that ~property be re, developed and that the Louis Anthony Hair Salon parking lot is connected to the proposed parking lot from the north. She said a sidewalk running parallel to the building is linked to the sidewalk on Thayer Street to provide pedestrians access to the commercial development. She explained that the petitioner does not propose a drive-through for the site and the site plan will not require Variations. Ms. C~rm~~~y further stated that the pr~p~sed structure w~u~d be c~nstructed ~f red brick and gray sp~it-face b~~ck. [t includes a flat roof on the ends of the building and a mansard roof over the middle section of the building. She said the building would be act, ented with decorative light fixtures and have a cream-colored metal band around the top of the building. She explained that it meets the intent of the ZBA and Village Board's policy of requiting masonry construction and architectural elements that provide a high quaFtty, attractive building. Ms. Connolly said the applicant has submitted a preliminary Land ~scape Plan for the property that shows approximately 28% of the proposed site is devoted to green space. She also said that the size of the proposed perimeter and parking landscape areas meet code requirements. She pointed out that the petitioner has made every effort to minimize the impact of the center on the residential properties across Louis andThayer Streets using a combination of landscaping, berms, and varied building materials. The landscape plan shows a thrce-foot tall berm, trees, and plantings along the rear and side of the property, in addition to a continuous row of bushes along the side yard. Ms. Connolly said the site is adjacent to residential properties and therefore, the proposed building is set back 30' from Louis and Thayer Streets. The parking lot is setback 12' from Rand Road and, after consolidating the two lots into a one-lot subdivision, the site will meet all required setbacks. Ms. Connolly said that, as proposed, the site would consist of a 23,000 sq. ft. commercial development and 123 parking spaces, which provides the petitioner with some flexibility to arrive at an appropriate tenant mix. She said that the petitioner would need to fred a combination of tenants and businesses that will require no more than this amount of park'mg or seek a ~ariation. She said the applicant has also agreed to provide cross-access between the properties and that this agreement would be recorded with the subdivision plat. Ms. Connolly said the proposed Map Amendment will meet the Map Amendment standards of the Zoning Ordinance, when the conditions of approval listed by staff have been met and, based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend approval of the proposed Map Amendment to permit the establishment of a commercial development without a drive-through at 791 E. Rand Road, Case Noi'ZBA-23-2000J Chairperson Juracek said that this parceI is mentioned several times in the Rand Road Corridor Plan and asked Ms. Connolly to give staffs interpretation of desired plans for this property. Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-23-2000 Arlene Iuracek, Chairperson '~ ~ '-~' Page 3 Judy Connolly said that the Rand Road Corridor Plan was prepared by the Plan Commission several years ago. She said that the plan provides a~histo~ of Ran~: Road,. documents conditions as existed 3vhile the plan was being draf~d, and includes longrangc~s plans for the corridor. She said that the plan has a narrative section but the policy direetion Comes from the last Section of the plan. "Issues and Action Steps". She said that although thc narratix;e s~on of the plan includes resideutial development of thc site in question as an alternative to cummcrcial, Ihc Action Steps call for commercial usage. She said that residential devclopmem of the site is not part of the Action Steps. Ms. Suracek asked if it.could be inferred that commarci.'d use wonld be preferred over residential in the study. Ms. connolly ~nded affmnatively. Ms. Juracek asked how 1cng Ms. C0n~olly had worked fort. he Village and, in that iime, had an~one'~PProached staffrogar.dingbUil~ng:r~sidenfial buildings on this parcel. Ms:. Conn011y said, toher knowledge, the~e had been.,no oppo~ity to turn down residential plans for this parCel in the three years she had worked for the Village. Elizabeth Luxem ~ked about parking requircn~ents for tl~e site and how the shared parking with the hair salon would affect the amount of parking for the pmpesed'''~ development. Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Planning, said parking needs change according to use. Retail use has different parking requirements than restaurants and fast food restaurants also have different requirements, tf extra spaces are available they might help alleviate the Louis Anthony parking situation. Ms. Luxem agreed with Mr. Blue's assessment and stated her concern that solving thebeauty shop parking deficiency was important. She asked Ms. Connolly if the owner Of the beauty shop had approached the Village about buying the parcel. Ms. connolly said not to her knowledge. Mr. Rogers ~ked about the lawsuit pertaining to the development of thisproperty. Ms. Connolly said there had been a 1973 lawsuit with a:judgement alloWing the construction of atile store on'the subject property without rezoning the site or obtaining the Village's approval for the use.~ Th~ judgement is still in effect to'lay. Ms. Jumeek said that ~e hair sal0rt had once. been a- gas station and asked if the land was zoned R1 (ye. sidential) when it was annexed by the Village. Mike Blue said state law requires land to be annexed in atthe most restrictive zoning. Steve Nikolas and Larry. LeMieux of the~Zabest Commercial Group in Brookfield, Wisconsin,, were sworn in. Mr. Nikolas thanked the ZBA for 6onsideration of their request for rezoning tO build retail stores at the Rand Road location. He said they had considered purchasing the property, since May of 1999 and that they have been working with Village staff to meet all code requirements. They are now requesting rezoning to construct a commercial development. Ms. ,Iuracek asked Mr. Nikolas to walk the ZBA through the project and detail the back ~levation of the building. Mr. Nikolas went to the easels and pointed out the various components of the.project, the building materials, the landscaping materials, and access tothe development. Ms. Juracek asked, since they were from out-of-state, if they had done market analyses of the area and had they been involved in similar developments. Mr. Nikolas said they had not done a full marketing study but that he had lived in this area until recently and was very familiar with the local market demands~ He said that they have been involved in successful developments in Brookfield, Kenosha and Rochester, Minnesota. After more discussion by ZBA memberS; Ms: Jufacek asked for speakerS from the audience. Chris Lenz~ 214 Louis; Laurie Camp, 216 N. Louis; Patty Ziegler, 112 N. Louis St.; Frank Shomberg, 105 Louis St.; HedWig Lundin, 200 N. Louis; Nancy Howard Wallace, 218 N. Louis; Joe Usery, 222 N. Louis; Zenon Golba, 115 N. Loui.s; Clifford UriSa, 109 Louis; Marion Hesch, 210 N. Louis; Robin Rose, 217 N. William;spoke against the proposed development. Their concerns with the proposed development were: outdoor smoking by employees; parking oning Board of Appeals ZBA~23-2000 Arlene Juracok, Chairperson Page 4 on Louis S~'eet; traffic congestion; Odors from-restaUrants~ b~kerie~and liquor establishments; 24-hour business uses; garbage, dumpsters and garbage .tn~eks; noise froH HVAC sYstemT~nage; unsightly views and/or viewof concrete wall from their living room w~ndows; lowered proI~rty'~9~tlues; delivery trucks, semis and emergency vehicles accessing the Sito;~ingress and egress of traffic; and the Viability of the development'With the number of existing strip malls in the area. Paul Spiewak was sworn in. He said that his father and Iris father'g partner haveowned the property for the past thirty years. He said that although the neighb0ring residents?had'¥oneerns Witha retail development in their neighborhood, he said that other ¢iti~eas of M0ant Prospect would ben,fit from 'this development. He cited an increase in property taxes and sales tax paid to the Village and subsequently paid tothe school districts. He said that4n the years that his father has owned the property, only one prospective multi-family builder approached them. The project was not pursued because the shape of the lot and the Rand Road traffic created challenges in arriving at a financially feasible residential development with respect to-the cost 0fthe land-and the Overall project. Mr. Spiewak said that the Zabest commercial proposal was'~highest and best use of the land. At 9:50, Ms. Juraeek closed the Public Hearing and asked for discussion from the Board. There was discussion among the members. In general, ZBA members empathized with the residents' concerns and voiced eoncorns about having anothe~ shopping center. There was discussion about the viability of another commercial development, as some ~xisting commercial sites are currently vacant. Leo Floros said that although he was opposed to this proposal, he wanted residents to realize that development would soon be coming to this parcel Merrill Cotten expressed similar sentiments. At 9:50, Chairperson Juracek closed the Public- Hearingand asked, for discussion ifrom the Board. Elizabeth Luxem made a motion to recommend approval of the request for a Map Amendment. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion. Chairperson Juracek reminded members that a No vote would bea vote against the proposed rezoHng and a Yes vote would allow the propOsed rezoning. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Luxem and Juracek NAYS: Cotten, Floros, Rogers, Youngquist, Motion was denied 4-2 and requires a super majority for the Village Board to approve the request because the ZBA did not make a positive recommendation. At 10:06 p.m., Merrill Cotten made motion toadjoumseconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. l~avbam: Swiatek, Planning Secretary Village of Mount prOSPect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT, PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: JULY 20, 2000 HEARING DATE: JULY 27, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-23-2000- MAP AMENDMENT- 791 W. RAND ROAD BACKGROUND INFORMATION Petitioners: Steve Nikolas / Larry LeMieux Zabest Commercial Group, Inc. 16800 W. Greenfield Ave. Brookfield, WI 53005 Statns of Petitioners: Contract Purchaser Lot Size: 2.2 acres Zoning: Existing: RI Single Family Residence Proposed: B3 Community Shopping District Land Use: Existing: Vacant lot Proposed: Retail Development Lot Coverage: Existing: 0% Proposed: 72.4% Maximum allowed: 75% Requested Actions: Rezone a vacant lot from R1 Single Family Residence to B3 Community Shopping to construct and operate a 23,000 square foot commercial development. BACKGROUND The subject property is a triangular-shaped vacant lot that fronts onto Rand Road. The site has never been developed although it abuts a car dealership to the south, a hair salon to the north, and is across the street from single family residences (Louis Street). Also, the site is across the street (Rand Road) from commercial uses (Menard's, a fast food restaurant, and a bowling alley). The applicants propose to consolidate two lots and construct a 23,000 square foot commercial development. The development will meet all Zoning and Development Code requirements. Louis Street and Rand Road will be fully improved, which entails dedicating fight-of-way where applicable, installing sidewalks, streetlights, and interior parking lot lights per Village code. A plat of resubdivision consolidating the site into a one-lot subdivision has to be prepared an.d reviewed by the Plan Commission. ZBA-23-2000 ZBA Meeting of July 27, 2000 Page 2 The attached site plan shows the location of the proposed building and access to the site. The 23,000 square foot commercial development does not provide vehicle access from Louis Street. The parking lot is designed to allow access to the south (Joe Mitchell Buick) if that property is redeveloped in the future, and a traffic light is installed on Rand Road. Also, the Louis Anthony Hair Salon parking lot is connected to the proposed parking lot from the north. As illustrated on the attached site plan, a sidewalk running parallel to the building is linked to the sidewalk on Thayer Street to provide pedestrians access to the site. The petitioner does not propose a drive-through for the site. The site plan, as proposed, will not require Variations. To conduct its analysis of the proposed Map Amendment, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. ANALYSIS Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: North: B3 Community Shopping / Louis Anthony Hair Salon South: R1 Single Fanaily Residence / Joe Mitchell Buick East: B3 Community Shopping / Menards, Lube Pros, and Thunder Bird Bowling Alley West: R1 Single Family Residences Approval Process The subject site is in the R1 Single Family Residence District. Commercial uses are not permitted in the R1 district. The proposed development will require Map Amendment approval by the Village Board, following a public hearing and recommendation by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The site, as proposed, will not require Variations to Zoning Code requirements. Comprehensive Plan Designation The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property for Multi-Family Residential - Medium Density use. The site wes never developed and abuts commerei~t[ uses, front~ onto a state route/major thoroughfare, and is across the street from commercial uses to the east and single family residences to the west. The petitioners' proposal is consistent with the trend of redevelopment occurring along Rand Road. The Rand Road Corridor Plan calls for a standalone commercial development in the range of 25,000 to 30,000 square feet without drive through facilities; that the hair salon seek a shared parking a~,m'eement when the site is developed; and that there is an adequate buffer between the residential and commercial uses. The petitioners' development ~meets these requirements. Furthermore, there are provisions for a shared means of ingress/egress with the property to the south. This access point lines up with the driveway across Rand Road. The Rand Road Corridor Plan calls for the continuation of sidewalks along Rand Road. Sidewalks will be installed along Rand Road and Louis Street to provide safer pedestrian access. Structure and Elevations The proposed structure is a 23,000 s.f. building that would be constructed of red brick and gray split-face block. The elevations include a fiat roof on the ends of the building and a mansard roof over the middle section of the building. The building would be accented with decorative light fixtures and have a cream colored dryvit band around the top of the building as shown on the submittad oolor elevations. It meets the intent of the ZBA and Village Board's policy of requiring mesonry construction and architectural elements that provide a high quality, attractive building. Landscape Plan The applicant has submitted a preliminary Landscape Plan for the property. Approximately 2g% of the proposed site is devoted to green space. ZBA-23-2000 ZBA Meeting of July 27, 2000 Page 3 Foundation plantings are not provided around the proposed structure, except for a triangular landscape area at the front of thc building. Article 23 requires a 10' foundation planting around the structure. Although this requiremant may be reduced administratively, the intent of the code must be met. To do so in this case, the applicant must enhance the proposed foundation landscape areas; Planter boxes located in front of thc building can be added to the proposal to meet the intent of this requirement. The size of the proposed perimeter and parking landscape areas meet code requirements. The petitioners' have made every effort to minimize the impact of the center on the residential property across Louis and Thayer Streets by proposing a three-foot tall berm, trees and a variety of plantings along the rear and side of the property and a continuous row of bushes along the side yard. Sheet A-2e (west Elevation) illustrates the view from Louis Street. Setbacks The site is adjacent to residential properties. Therefore, the proposed building is set back 30' from Louis Street and Thayer Street. The parking lot is setback 1:2' from Rand Road. Parking lots in the B-3 District must be set back a minimum of 10' from any property line where the site abuts non-residential property. The proposed parking lot meets the 10' setback requirements adjacent to non-residential property. After consolidating the two lots into a one-lot subdivision, the site will meet all required setbacks. Parking and Stacking Section 14.2224 lists a parking requirement for commercial uses. Retail uses require 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area, sit down restaurants require I space for each three scats plus one space per employee, and fast-food restaurants without a drive-through require 12 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. As proposed, the site would eensist of a 23,000 sq. ff. commercial development and 123 parking spaces, which provides the petitioner with some flexibility with the site's tenant mix. It is the petitioners' responsibility to find a combination of tenants and businesses that will require no more than this amount of parking or seek a variation. The applicant has also agreed to provide cross-aecass between the properties (north and south) with the subdivision plat. Review by Other Departments .- The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposals and noted the following Development Code requirements to be met for the site. These comments need not be resolved to approve the Map Amendment, but must be addressed with the building permit submission for the development. 1. Louis Street currently has a 50' wide right of way along the subject property. An additional 16' must be dedicated to provide the standard 66' width and all right-of-way improvements must be installed. Please note that this would be consistent with the right of way widths north and south of the subject .property. 2. Thayer Street east of Louis Street has a right of way width of only 33', and extends roughly halfway to Rand Road. Allowing this site to develop as proposed would make extending Thayer Street to Rand Road impossible. The Thoroughfare Plan contained in the Comprehensive Plan does not show Thayer Street extending to Rand Road. Considering the number of vehicles traveling on Rand Road, extending Thayer Street to Rand Road would provide an opportunity for vehicles to cut-threugh the residential neighborhood to bypass Rand Road traffic lights. The Community Development staff would like to minimize the impact of commuter traffic on residential neighborhoods as much as possible and not extending Thayer Street to Rand Road would keep additional vehicles off local streets. 3. An existing water main is located in an easement along the south side of the property. This water main, as well as the easement, must be maintained. ZBA-23-2000 ZBA Meeting of July 27, 2000 Page 4 Furthermore, the proposed development fails under Sections 16.106.B and 16.106.D of the Development Code, causing the entire site to be subject to all Development Code requirements. These requirements need not be addressed at this time, however, the final engineering plans cannot be approved, nor can a building permit be issued until all Development Code requirements are satisfied. REQUIRED FINDINGS Map Amendment The standards for Map Amendments are listed in Section 14.203.D.8.a of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Map Amendment. These standards relate to: The compatibility with existing uses of property within the general area The compatibility with zoning classification of property within the general area The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing zoning classification The consistency with the trend of development in the general area including changes which have taken place in its present zoning classification The compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification ~ The objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan and impact of the proposed amendment to said objectives ~ The suitability of the property in question for permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification The subject parcel for the proposed Map Amendment is a vacant parcel in an established commercial corridor and is adjacent to residential and commercial uses. The applicant proposes to establish a new commercial development without a drive-through on the parcel. The petitioners do not have signed leases with tenants because the project is in the preliminary stages of development and has not been approved by-the Village,- however the uses permitted in the proposed B3 zoning district will be similar~in intensity to. the surrounding commercial area. The proposal is Of a similar intensity to the surrounding commercial area. The landscaping, architectural design of the building, and site eonfignration should minimize the impact on the adjacent residential area. The proposed Map Amendment will comply with the Action Steps listed in the Rand Road Corridor Plan, which supplements the Comprehensive Plan. The essential character of the proposal, a commercial development without a drive through, would not have a detrimental effect on the public welfare and is consistent with the trend of development occurring along Rand Road and other commercial corridors in the Village. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Map Amendment will meet the Map Amendment standards in Section 14.203.D~8.a of the Zoning Ordinance, when the conditions of approval, listed below, have been met. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend approval of the proposed Map Amendment to permit the establishment of a commercial development without a drive-through at 791 E. Rand Road, Case No. ZBA-23-2000. The Village Board's decision is final for this ease. The conditions of approval are: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by the Albion Group dated July 17, 2000 (Attachment 1). 2. Revise elevations so the mansard roof is extended over the entire building, providing a more consistent design and screening all roof top equipment. 3. Revise the landscape plan to include six evergreen bushes along the southwest property line. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements. Such plans include the installation of all necessary public improvements along adjacent public rights-of-way. BA-23-2000 ZBA Meeting of Suly 27, 2000 Page $ 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. 7. Approval ora plat by the Plan Commission and recordation of that Plat of Subdivision for the subject property including the following items: a. cross-access/egress easements for all driveways and proposed driveways crossing property lines; b. a peq~:ual shared parking agreement with the business north of the site; c. dedication of right of way along Louis Street and Rand Road; d. maintaining the 33' easement for the water line to the Village along the south lot llne. William J. ' ~ ' ~o~ney, AICP,q:)irector of Community Development vw[ 8/8/00 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 791 EAST RAND ROAD WHEREAS, Steve Nikolas and Larry LeMieux d/b/a Zabest Commercial Group, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner), have filed an application to rezone certain property generally located at 791 West Rand Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as shown on the legal description, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit '%"; and WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned from R-1 (Single Family Residence) District to B-3 (Community Shopping) District; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for rezoning being the subject of ZBA Case No. 23-2000, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of July, 2000, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 12th day of July, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and negative recommendation, having voted 2-4 to approve the request, to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA 23-2000 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Official Zoning Map of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance from R-1 to B-3 (Community Shopping) District. SECTION THREE: The amendment being the subject of this Ordinance are subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the site shall be in conformance with plans prepared by Albion Group, dated July 17, 200 (Attachment 1). 2. Revise elevations so the mansard roof is extended over the entire building, providing a more consistent design and screening all roof top equipment. 3. Revise the landscape plan to include six evergreen bushes along the southwest property line. Page 2/3 791 W. Rand Rd. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements. Such plans include the installation of all necessary public improvements along adjacent public rights-of-way. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. 7. approval of a plat by the Plan Commission and recordation of that Plat of Subdivision for the subject property including the following items: a. cross access-access/egress easements for all driveways and proposed driveways crossing property lines; b. a perpetual shared parking agreement with the business north of the site; c. dedication of right-of-way along Louis Street and Rand Road; d. maintaining the thirty-three foot (33') easement for the water line to the Village along the south lot line. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L, Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Page 3/3 791 W. Rand Road EXHIBIT "A" 791 WEST RAND ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: Part of the Northwest QuaKer of the Southwest QuaKer of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing in the west line of said Northwest QuaKer of the southwest quaker at a point which is 359 feet north of the southwest corner of said northwest quaker of the southwest quaker; thence east parallel with the south line of said northwest quaker of the southwest quaker for a distance of 223.85 feet to an intersection with the center line of Rand Road; thence northerly along said center line for a distance of 71.69 feet; thence west parallel with the south line of said northwest quaker of the southwest quaker for a distance of 188.19 feet to an intersection with the west line of said northwest quarter of the southwest quarter; thence south for a distance of 62 feet to the place of beginning, in Cook County, Illinois; Parcel 2: Parcel of land in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois described as follows: commencing at the southwest corner of said Northwest quarter of the southwest quarter; thence north along the west line of said northwest quarter of the southwest quaker for a distance of 359 feet; thence east parallel with the south line of said northwest quarter of the southwest quaker for a distance of 223.85 feet to an intersection with the center line of Rand Road; thence southerly along said centerline for a distance of 414.99 feet to an intersection with the south line of said northwest quarter of the southwest quarter; thence west along said south line for a distance of 430.28 feet to the place of beginning. Containing 105,868 square feet (2.4304 acres) of land, more or less, southwesterly of southwesterly line of Rand Road. VWL 8/4100 ORDINANOE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 (RESERVED) OF THE VILLAGE CQDE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Chapter 3, "Reserved," of the Mount Prospect Village Code be renamed and recodified as Chapter 3, "General Definitions." SECTION TWO: That Article I, of Chapter 3, as renamed and recodified, is hereby created and codified as "Definitions." SECTION THREE: That Section 1.101 of Chapter 3 of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be and read as follows: "SECTION: 3.101: Definitions of Words and Phrases 3.101 DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND PHRASES: Whenever, in the Mount Prospect Village Code, the following words and phrases are used, they shall, for the purposes this Code, have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this Article, except when the context in which they are used indicates otherwise. GENDER: Any reference to gender (i.e. he/she, him/her, chairman,) within the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be hereby interpreted as gender neutral." SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-29-2000 - CONDITIONAL USE - 521 N. EASTWOOD UNENCLOSED COVERED FRONT PORCH JOANNE CLEVENGER- APPLICANT The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their' ~'e~ommendation to approve a Conditional Use permit to construct an unenclosed covered front porch in the front setback of an existing single family residence. The proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their August 24, 2000 meeting. After a brief discussion of the property and the Zoning Code Conditional Use standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals members voted 7-0 to recommend approval of a request for a Conditional Use permit for the construction of a 4'x19' unenclosed covered porch within 25 feet of the front property line at 521 N. Eastwood, Case No. ZBA-29-2000. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 5~ meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter. Village of MoUn e6Spect Community DeVelopmen partment MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 17, 2000 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 24, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-29-2000 - CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN UNENCLOSED PORCH 521 N. EASTWOOD (CLEVENGER RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND I~FORMATION PETITIONER: $oanne Clcvcnger 521 N. Eastwood Mount Prospect, IL 60056 STATUS OF PETITIONER: Property Owner PARCEL NUMBER: 03.34-119-001 ............... LOT SIZE: 6,419 square feet EXISTING ZONING: RA Single Family Residence EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residence LOT COVERAGE: 38% existing 40% proposed 50°,4 maximum per RA district REQUESTED ACTION: PROPOSAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A PORCH ADDITION WITHIN 25'10" OF THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE The subject property is an existing home located on a comer lot on a single-family residential street. The home is currently set back 29'10" from the front lot line. The applicant proposes to construct a 4'x19' unenclosed porch along the front of the house. The proposed porch will encroach 4'2" into the required front setback. The petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to allow the portion of the porch addition along the front of the structure to encroach 4-feet into the required front yard. As illustrated on the attached plans, the porch would be attached to the front of the existing home and set back 25'10" from the front property line. The petitioner is not proposing improvements other than the front porch, which she feels will improve the appearance of her home and add a desirable feature to the structure. ( ZBA-29-2000 ZBA Meeting of August 24, 2000 Page 2 To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. REQUIRED FINDINGS Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious ~to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; c~ Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and r~ Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. ' ........... The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 7,620 square foot parcel developed with a single family home. The applicant proposes a pomh that extends into the front setback. The encroachment of the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the RA distr/et and meets all other zoning requirements. The proposal would have no negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The essential character of the neighborhood - a single-family 'residential area - would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. RECOMMENDATION The proposed porch addition enhances the existing home and the Conditional Use request meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach 4-feet into the required front setback for the residence at 521 N. Eastwood, Case No. Zl~A-29-2000. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: 5?:o re tor VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,~ PI/atoning Division 100 S. Emerson Street ':' !/: Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval Case Number Development Name/Address Date of Submission .... Site Area (Acres) _ I ProperW Zoning Total BuildingSq. FL (Site) Setbacks: Front ~- --,~/ I Rear Side Building Height I Lot Coverage (%) ~' I Number of Parking Spae~ Adjacent Land Uses: North South [ East West Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Nmber(~) C3a - 5q - ~q -- (:X::)l - OOC)O Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) l'~ar~e' ~ · · '" Telepho~n.e (flay) Corporation Telephone (evening) S~'eet Address Fax City State Zip Code Pager Interest in Property 0 botqe.(- Name Tel,, .,one (day) -- Corporation V I Telephone (evening) - Street Address Fax: City State Zip Code Pager Developer Name Telephone (day) Address ~'"~ Fax Attorney Name '-... Telephone (day) Address ~ Fax Surveyor Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Name ~.~ Telephone (day): Landscape Architect Name Telephone (day): Address ~ Fax ~ '. Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5325 I00 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect lllinois Fax 847.818.532(- 2 TDD 847.392.606z .~C./S, LE I/$, -~1'-0'~ '-000 Z~' - O" J'~ kC, zg'-IO~ E~(IS-T'INIG (~oN¢IZETE. ¢1-o0¢ ~,1,41F ldkt._F.. ¢c.~L-6' Pe" ¢ I'- o" CLEVENGF__.I;Z, [~E¢I[2E. NCE' ~oR-'rH l',douklT PKOSPF--..c'F IL. &oofSG E'~"rF_-.: 6, MINUTES ~ O~ A~PEALS CASE NO. ZBA-29-2000 Hearing Date: August 24; 2000 ~PETITIONER: JoanneClevenger PUBLICATION DATE: August 9, 2000 $O,UP,_NAL~OPICS REQUEST:, Conditional Use for an unen~0sed porch to be constructed within 25'I0" of the front property line MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Hal Ettinger Leo Floros Elizabeth Luxem Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Arlene ~ura~k, Chairperson lVIEMBER~ ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to ord.e.r at 7:34 p:m. After a motion by Richard Rogers, ~econded. by_ Elizabeth Luxem, minutes of the July 27, 2000 meeting were approved, new member, Hal Ettinger, abstained from voting. At 8.'22, after hearing another case, Ms. Juracek opened Case ZBA-29-2000, a request for a Conditional Use for an unenclosed porch to be constructed within 25'10" of the front property line. Judy Counolly; Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given, introduced the staff memorandum for the Conditional Use and informed the Zoning Board that the case would be Village. Board final. Ms. Counolty sum.maj.'zed-the case by stating that the subject property is an existing home located on a comer lot on a single-family residential s~reet, currently set back 29'10" from the front lot .line. She said the applicant proposes to construct a 4'x19' unenclosed porch along the front of the house which would encroach 4'2" into the required front setback. Ms. Connolly said the petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to allow the portion of the porch addition along the front Ms. Connolly said staff conducted its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use by reviewing the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visiting the site. She explained that the subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 7,620 square foot parcel developed with a single family home and the applicant proposes a porch that extends into the front Setback. This encroachment of the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the R-A district but meets all other ZOning requirements. She said the proposal would have no negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets, and would be in compliance with the Comprehensive. Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. Ms Connolly said the essential character of the neighborhood - a single-family residential area - would not be affected by the prOposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. Based on these findings, Staffrecommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board oning Board of Appeals ~ ZBA-29-2000 Arlene Suraeek, Chairperson Page 2 to approve a Conditional use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach 4-feet into the required front setback for the residence at 521 N. Eastwood, Case No. ZBA-2?;2000. Chairperson Suracek asked if Board members had questions for Ms. Connolly. There were no questions and Ms. Juracek asked if petitioner wished to speak. $oanne Clevenger was sworn in and said she Wanted to echo Ms. Connolly's words. She said the porch would enhance the appearance of her Cape Cod home and provide additional shade. She stated that the neighbors did not object to her plans. Ms. Suracek remarked that, from the drawings, the porch appeared bean attractive addition and compatible with other homes in the area. Richard Rogers asked Ms. Clevenger if she understood the porch wouid need to remain open and unenclosed. Ms. Clevenger said she did understand she could not enclose the porch at a future date. Mr. Hal Ettinger said the drawings seemed to indicate .the improvement would consist of the existing concrete stoop with a wood deck abutting it and asked if the porch would be all one surface. Ms. Clevenger said the porch would be an even surface but would be concrete and wood. Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval 0f the request for Variation and Conditional Use with the conditions listed in the staff memo. Richard Rogers seconded themofion. At 8:29, Chairperson Juracek closed the Public Hearing and asked for discussion from the Board. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Luxem, Rogers, Youngquist, and Suracek -NAYS: None Motion was approved %0. At 9.'25 p.m., Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist/'g'he m6tio~ was~approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjouroed. Barbara Swiatek, Planning STretary vwl 8/30/00 8/31/00 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 521' NORTH' EASTWOOD AVENUE WHEREAS, Joanne Clevenger (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 521 N. Eastwood Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property), legally described as follows: Property Index Number: 03-34-119-001 Lot 22 in Block 1 in Prospect Manor, being a subdivision of part of the South % of the West ~ of the West ~ of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use to construct an unenclosed covered porch within 25 feet (25') of the front property line; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Conditional Use being the subject of ZBA Case No. 29-2000 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of August, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Joumal& Topics on the 9~' day of August, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 29-2000; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting ofthe proposed Conditional Use would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. ZBA 29-2000 Page 2/2 SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use for the construction of an unenclosed porch within 25 feet (25') of the front property line, as shown onthe Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit '%." SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk ishereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L. Fadey Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER l, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-32-2000 - CONDITIONAL USE - 411 N. EMERSON STREET UNENCLOSED COVERED FRONT PORCH CI-I~RYL AND KEVIN MURRAY - APPLICANTS The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use permit to construct an unenclosed covered from porch in the front setback of an existing single family residence. The proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report, The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their August 24, 2000 meeting. After a brief discussion of the property and the Zoning Code Conditional Use standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals members voted 7-0 to recommend approval of a request for a Conditional Use permit for the construction of a 5'x32' unenclosed covered porch within 25 feet of the front property line at 411 N. Emerson Street, Case No. ZBA-32-2000. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 5th meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. -. William J, Cooney Jr., AICP Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOLrNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 17, 2000 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 24, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-32-2000 - CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN UNENCLOSED PORCH 411 N. EMERSON STREET (MURRAY RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND INFORMATION PETITIONER: Kevin and Cheryl Murray 411 N. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 STATUS OF PETI'IIONER: Property Owners PARCEL NIIM~ER: 03-34-2094)07 LOT STZI*,: 7,620 square feet . EXISTING ZONING: RA Single Family Residence ....................... EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residence LOT COVERAGE: 28% existing 30% proposed 50% maximum per RA district REQUESTED ACTION: PROPOSAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A PORCH ADDITION WITHIN 26 FEET OF THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE The subject property is an existing home located on an interior lot on a single-family residential street. The home is currently set back 31.10-feet from the front lot line. The applicants propose to construct a 5'x32' unenclosed porch along the front of the house. The proposed porch will encroach 4-feet into the required front setback. The petitioners are seeking a Conditional Use to allow the portion of the porch addition along the front of the structure (approximately 32-feet) to encroach 4-feet into the required front yard. As illustrated on the attached plot plan, the porch would be attached to the front of the existing home and set back 26.10 feet from the front property line. The petitioner is not proposing improvements other than the front porch, which they feel will improve the appearance of their home and add a desirable feature to the structure. BA-32-2000 ZBA Meeting of August 24, 2000 Page 2 To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. REQUIRED FINDINGS Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance, The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: ca The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; ca The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the crderly development of those properties; r~ Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and ca Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 7,620 square foot parcel developed with a single family home. The applicant proposes a porch that extends into the front setback. The encroachment of the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the RA district and meets all other zoning requirements. The proposal would have no negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The essential character of the neighborhood - a single-family residential area - would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. RECOMM~ENDATION ...... ' The proposed porch addition enhances the existing home and the Conditional Use request meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach 4-feet into the required front setback for the residence at 411 N. Emerson Street, Case No. ZBA-32-2000. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: ~ ~tkor of Commumty ~evelopment William J. C;o~;, AIC~, ' ' 'VILLAGE OF t. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 100 S. Emerson fitteet · Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Application for Conditional Use Approval I ~ ! I Da~ df Subregion · I~~ I'~g~ · .. ~ · ..' ~~~ite) ~ fietbac~: Build~g H~i~t I Lot Coverage (%) Numar of P~ Spac~ Adjust ~d U~: ~ 0~-~ -~o~- 007- ooo0 Legal Descdpfioa (a~ch ad~fion~ sh~ ~ Co.option Telephoae (even~g) ~eet Address F~ ~ t Ci~ State Zip Code Pager ~ Interest in Prope~ Name ( Telephone(, ./) Co.ration Telephone (evening) S~et Ci~ S~ Zip C~e Paget Developer A~oraey N~e ~ ~" Telephone (~y) Ad.ss~ . F~ Su~eyor N~e Telephone (~y) N~e Telephone (~y) ' Architect N~e Telephone (~y): Ad~e~ ~ F~ Land~eape Arehit~t Nme ~ Telephone (day): Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.81 $.532S 100 South Emerson Street. Mount Prospect Illinois Fax 847.818.5329 2 TDD 847.392.606z Proposed ConditLonalUse (as listed in the zoning district),~:' D~scribe m Detad the Buildings and Activities PtO~d ~d H6~ the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standatd~ for Conditional use Approval (attach additional sheets ir'necessary) Hours of Operation Address(es) (S~'eet Number, Street) -- 'ql Iq. Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use "6t, 2.,o RPr qcil tq2. to:~ Setbacks: ~.. Front Rear ~1~' Side Side e_ -- Building Height Lot Coverage (%) ~umber of Parking Spaces Plense note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed arid ~li reqU~ed p~and 0t~er ~ have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. I~complete submittals will not be accepted. It is s~'ongly sugge~d that petitioner schedule an appoLntment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completene~ at the time of submittal In consideration of the information cunta~ed in ~ petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of~,e property. The petitioner and the owner of thc property grant employees of the ViUage of Meant Prospect and their a&ants permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby aff'uTn that all informktion provided herein a~d in all fnateriais submitted in a~ociatinn with this application are ~ue and accurate to th~ ~ o~ledge. Appllcan~..~ i'~ ~ ~T Date I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. ?roperty Owner Date Mount Prospect Department of Community Development Phone 847.818.5328 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Hlinois Fax 847.818.5329 3 TDD 847.392.6064 MINUTES MOUIVI CASE NO. ~BK-32~2000 Hearing Date: August 24; 2000 PE'I:ITIONER: Kevin and: Cheryl Murray REQUEST: Conditional Use for an unenclosed porch within 26 feet of the front property line MEiVI~BERS PRESENT: Merrill Cottan Hal Ettinger Leo Fl0ros Elizabeth Luxem Richard Rogers Keith Youngqulst Arlene .Iuraeak; Chairperson iV[EMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner INTERESTED PART]I~S: None CEhairperson Arlene .luraeak called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. ~Af~. r a motion by Ric~.Rogcrs, s.e~o, nde~l- by lizal~h Luxem, miuntes of the ~uly 27; 2000 meeting were approved, new member, Hal Ettmger, abstained from voting. At 9 08, after hearing three other cases, Ms. ~uracek opened Case ZBA-32-2000, a request for a Conditional Use f~r an unenclosed porch within 26 feet Of the property line. Sud3 had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the item. She s home.located on an interior lot on a single-family residential street, c line. She said the applicants propose to construct a $'x.32' unenclosed' into the required front setback~ Ms. Connolly exp~ned that the petitioners are seeking a Conditional Use to allow the 32-feet front portion of.the porch addition t~ enCroaCh 4-feet into the required front yard. She said the petitioner is not proposing omer improvements and they feel the addition will improve the appearance of their home and add a desirable feature to the structure. Ms. Connolly said that, to conduct its analys~s of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petmoner s plat o survey and site plan and visited the site. She said the subject parcel is a 7,620 square foot parcel with a single family home and the applicant proposes to build a porch that extends into the front setback. The encroachment of the porch into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the R-A district and meets all other zoning requirements. Ms. Coanoliy explained that the proposal would have no negative impact on the adjacent area, utility pr~vision or public streets. She said the proposed Conditional Use would be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements ~nd the essential character of the neighborhood -a single-fatally residential area - would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. oning Board of Appeals :- . ZBA-32-2000 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson :.' '~ Page 2 Ms. Counolly gave Staffs recommendation that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board, whose decision is final for this case, to approve a Conditional:Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach 4-feet into the required front setback for the residence at 411 N. Emerson Street, Case No. ZBA-32-2000. The petitioner, Kevin Murray, was sworn in and testified he had lived in the house for 41 years, was raised there and was now raising his children in the same'hoUSE. He wanted.to add a front porch for the family's enjoyment. He,said he thought the porch addition would be compatible with the area and mentioned several other front porches in the immediate Vicinity~ Ms. Suracek said she could understand his reasons for wanting a porch addition. Richard Rogers asked if Mr. Murray understood he could never enclose:the perch or convert it to a room addition. Mr. Murray said he realized that. Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval of the request for a Conditional Use for an unenclosed porch within 26 feet of the property line, with the conditions listed in the staff memo. Leo Flores seconded the motion. At 9:12, Chairperson Juracek closed the Public Hearing and asked fordiscussion from the Board. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Flores, Luxem, Rogers, Youngqui~ and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. At 9:25 p.m., Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and~the m~eting was.adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretars' vwl 8/30/00 8/31/00 ORDINANCE NO. " AN ORDrlNANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 411 NORTH EMERSON STREET WHEREAS, Cheryl and Kevin Murray (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed a petition for a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 411 N. Emerson Street (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property), legally described as follows: Property Index Number: 03-34-209-007 Lot 155 in H. Roy Berry Co's Castle Heights, being a subdivision of the North ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northwest ¼ and the Southwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Conditional Use to construct an unenclosed covered porch within 25 feet (25') of the front property line; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Conditional Use being the subject of ZBA Case No. 32-2000 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24"~ day of August, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 9~ day of August, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 32-2000; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. ZBA 32-2000 Page 2/2 SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use for the construction of an unenclosed porch within 25 feet (25') of the front property line, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit '%." SECTION THREE; That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\G E~iles~WlN~O RDINANC~COn Use, 411 N Emerson,pOrch, Aug 2000.doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~l~ DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-28-2000 - VARIATION - 1104 W. CENTRAL ROAD CONSTRUCT SIX-FOOT FENCE RITA FERNANDES - APPLICANT The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a variation to construct a six-foot wooden fence. The petitioner is proposing to construct the fence with the finished side facing in, a shadow box pettem on the exterior of the fence and covered rails and posts on both sides. The petitioner also agreed to record a covenant requiring that the top one-foot portion of the fence be removed when the petitioner no longer lives at the subject property. The proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their August 24, 2000 meeting. The ZBA heard comment on the request from a representative of the petitioner and the ZBA discussed the project in detail. Issues discussed included the impact of the taller wooden fence on the adjacent neighbors, the Village's responsibility to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, and the condition of the petitioner's child. The ZBA voted 7-0 to approve the request. The Zoning Ordinance states that the ZBA's decision is final for fence variations. However, the Village received a written appeal from the adjacent neighbors on August 25, 2000 and August 29, 2000. Therefore, the request is being forwarded to the Village Board for their reviex~ and final determination. Attached are copies of the neighbors' letters. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 5th meeting. Staff'will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. ~ooney,'Jr., A~ICP /bs ~ .... /~, ............ ~lg~tst 28, 2000 Hr. William Cooney .... Director of Comantnity Development 100 South E~erson Street Mto Prospect, Ill. 60656 Re: Case Z~A-28-2000 (1104 W. Central load) Dear Hr. Cooney: [ am'~ritin~ to advise you that I'would like to appeal the Zoning ~oard's decision to approve the erection of a six-foot high vooden fence surrounding the entire back yard of the residence at 1104 W. Central Road. While vas the only party o~ning property adjacent to this home ~ho vas able to attend the ~eeting on Au~tst 24th, ! have learned th&t other effected nei[h~ors also have concerns but, ~or various reasons ~ere ~nable to attend that meatin~o Yery-£rankly~ I vas surprised vhen I learned of the ~oard's decision for several reasonsI 1o The lady asking for thet~eFonln~/~as not willing to personally address the Cor~atttee~ a£ter at least tvo requests from 2. The pet[~i-~e~ knowing of her special needs~ evidently bought the property ~ithout determining she vould need a variance. ! believe her realestate agent should be held responsibleo ~. The parties appearing in her behalf vets ~oth from ot[t of state (Hichigan I believe). Their presents[ion vas explaining the ditficulties associated vith a child with this problemo &~ When they finished their emotional presentation [ felt like I appeared to be a horrible, non-caring person only interested in protecting the appearance of the surrounding property. 5. ~4hile [ am 85 years of age and have lived in the home I had built for 46 years, undoubtedly vhen ~, or my ~[fe or ch£1dren go to sell our house a six ioof fence will certainly not add to the appeal off a potential b~tyero 6. I certainly question the decision to try and protect this boy on a road as htsy as Central Road. I can attest to the amount off tra£fic ~hlch makes it very to even cross £n a oar, considering the speed at ~hlch the traffic moves. 7. From the close supervision it appears is needed, question how much unsupervised time is I ~ertainly hope the ~oard ~ill give as much consideration to the o~raers of surrounding property as they do to the petitioner. Yours very truly~ Garl Eo Anderson 6 N. Lancaster St. Mt. Prospect, Ill. Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AKLENE JLrRACEK, CHAIRPERSON FKOM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 17, 2000 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 24, 2000 SUBJECT: ZBA-28-2000 - FENCE VARIATION 1104 W. CENTRAL ROAD (FERNANDES RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND INFORMATION Petitioner: Kita Femandes 1104 W. Cenlral Koad Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Status of Petitioner: Property Owner · Parcel Number: 03-33-417-020 Lot Size: 7,500 square feet Existing Zoning: RA Single-family Residence Existing Land Use: Single-family Residence Requested Action: Variation to allow construction of a six-foot perimeter fence. BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION The subject property is an existing residence on an inter/or lot in a single-family residential neighborhood. The house has an existing four-foot fence around the perimeter of the property. The applicant proposes to remove the existing fence and install a six-foot wooden, perim.eter fence as shown on the Attachment A. A section of the fence would be located behind the 30-foot front setback, parallel to the front of the house. Section 14.304.D.l.e of the Zoning Code permits a five-foot fence. The petitioner states that the proposed fence is necessary because she has a special needs ch/Id who requires a taller, sturdier fence to deter h/m from climbing the fence. The petitioner states that the proposed fence will ensure that the child stays in the yard. The child's neurologist has subrrdtted a letter of support for the proposed Variation request. The neurologist agrees with the petitioner's assessment that a taller fence is needed to ensure the child's safety when he is playing in the yard. Staff reviewed the request with the petitioner and possible alternatives to installing a sit-foot fence. Initial discussions focused on using landscape features such as trellises, plantings, or a combination of such means to deter the child from climbing the fence. The petitioner felt that these alternatives would not be effective. BA-28-2000 August 24, 2000 Meeting Page 2 To conduct its analysis of the proposed variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan, visited the site, and spoke with the applicant. REQUIRED FINDINGS Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These standards relate to: a hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; [~ intent of variation is not to increase financial gain; and c~ protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The subject parcel is similar to other lots in the Village and is not unique in its surroundings, shape, or topography. The rationale for the proposed variation is related to the petitioner's child's quality of life, rather than economic factors. The proposed fence would not have a significant effect on public welfare or neighborhood character. Although the applicant's request for a taller fence and location is based on her child's needs, no real hardship related to the unique conditions of the site exists as outlined by the Zoning Ordinance. RECOM1VIENDATION Based on the lack of a finding of hardship, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance~ Staff recommends denial of a variation from Sections 14.304.D.l.e and Sec. 14.304.D.l.e.(1) to install a six-foot wooden perimeter fence and its proposed location (behind the front setback) at 1104 W. Central Road, Case No. ZBA-28-2000. The petitioner's request does not meet the standards for a Variation as defined by the Village's Zoning Ordinance. However, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) indicates that reasonable accommodations are made for individuals when ADA regulations apply. If the ZBA grants the variation, Staffrecommends that the variation be conditioned, as authorized by Sec. 14.203.C.11, to the petitioner only and that the six-foot fence be reduced to five-feet or removed when the petitioner moves from the property. The Zoning Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William ~. Coo~irector of Community Development VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ,. ~.~--~; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 10o S. Emerson Mount Prospe~ Illinois 60056 Phone FAX 847.818,5329 Variation Request The Zoning Board of Appeals h~ final admlntstrnfive authority for all petitions for fence variations and those variation reqnest~ that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the ¥111age's Zoning Ordinance. PETITION FOR ZONING BOARD Ol~ APPKAI.~ REVIEW Q Village Board Ftm. I ~ZBA ~ T~ ~. N~r or ~ ~i~ ~ ~ Ad~ 0 I Ci~ Zip C~e ~gar ~ame Telephone (day) Ci~ S~e Zip ~o P~ N~e ~ Tet~hone (~y) A~~ A~ ~ Tel~hone (~y) Ad~ Sa~or ~ Tel~h~e (~y) Nme ~ Tele~one (~) A~ " A~bit~ N~O ~ Tel~hone (~y): Ad~ ~ ~n~ A~hit~ N~e ~ TeI~houc (~y): A~e~ ~ Sou~ ~c~on S~ Mo~t ~ct lll~no~, ~056 2 ~D ~7.3~.~ Code Section(s) tar which Variation(s) ~s (are) R. equc~ced Sumflu~' a~d Justification f'o*' K~ques? V~d~iofl(s), Relate lu~iflcatlcfi to the Attached $~dards for Variations [ have a 12 year old sou name Chris Beazley w~o has a digabillty which is extreme h~e~actiVicy/auCtsm, seizures, delayed speech development and please note that the applicafio~ will not be accepted unffi thh pctflina h~s b~m fidly completed and all requ/rcd plans and o~hcr ma~eria~ have been s~isfactodly su~ to the p!,,,~n~ Division. It is ~,~gly sugge~'~d tha~ ~e pctft~ortcr schedule an appclntme~t wkh thc a~prol~ate V~liase s~so that mate~iah c~n b~ renewed for accuracy a~d complctene~s i~for to submRt~l. In c°nS ~-a~ou o~the inform~ion cootain~ in this pet,'on as well as all sep~ortlng documen~ion, it i~ ~cluested ~at approval bc ~o this requc~ The a~plicant is thc owns' ce ~thc~z~ rcpresen~ive of ~ owner of g~e propcr~. The pc~oncr and the ov,-n~ of th~ · propel~ty graut employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and thch* agents permission t~ eater on the properS/dur~g reasonable hou~ · : for visual Inspect/on of thc s~bject propen'y. i hereby a/~tm that all in/'omlat/cn prov/ded here/n and in all matcfiah submlt~ed in assoch//on w/th this apPllCatinn ar~ tree and If applicant is not property owner:. [ hereby designate the applicant to at~ ~ my agent for the purpose of s~king the Variation(s) descn'bed in this application and th associated supposing material Properv/Owner Date Mount Proap~ct Depar~ent of Com~nity Development Phone 847.8 .~k vaa~, ~,~.o~ ~oo68 m~Advocate Lutheran General Children's Hospita, v,a~,~ic Nc~logr July 18, 2000 o,~ok~y RE: CHRIS BEAZLEY ole~c~t~ DATE OF BIRTH: 08-25-1988 Dermatology ~dot~ca~ v~,~ CHART: 00-46-83-80 To Whom It May Concern: m~..~loeqO.,~ogy Chris Beazley is followed in Pediatric Neurology Clinic for autism and ~.~o~ c,i..~ seizures. His mother, Rita Fernandes, has contacted me regarding her petition N~*~ov~mv~-~.,.~. to have a six-foot fence placed around the house she has recently bought in N¢~'~%'Y Mount Prospect. The home is on Central Road offNorthwest Highway. o~o~r.~osy Chris is an extremely hyperactive a~d agile individ~ who could easily r~ c~ v~,~ overcome the obstacle of a fence shorter than six feet Because of his autism, ~,~dosr Chris is incapable of comprehending the danger of Iraffic or other factors }~h~o, T~,~Vy outside of his home, presenting a considerable risk of accidental injury or of m~osy becoming lost. Ms. Fermmdes is working extremely hard to provide as normal and positive s~.o~v oi~= environment for Chris as possible. It would be beneficial for him to be able to C~d tX~do~ spend time safely outside in his yard. As his neurologist, I would appreciate o~ va,~ any allowance you could make in ~ matter when applying Mount Prospect's cm~ ~i~,~a current restrictions on fence height Gt~e~, c~ ~ m~ Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact swi~ ~& c~ me if needed. Ne~oaml I~ligh ~ Folk~-u~ Sincerely, Michele Metriek, MD Pediatric Neurology ~-~-.advocat ehealth.co m Related to the Eva~gellcal Lutheran Church in America and the United Church oir Ch~ · Spruce Stockade ;~: , . :~,;'~.,..-, . '~ - ,~. (~713) F~nch Gothic ' ' Spaced Cedar , "' J Picket ' ',, ';~ 'k,,' . ~ ~'~x~ .-' · ' ..... ~ Cedar Dofloared ,,,, ~ ~.~ Dogea~ .... Fence Picket ~, ,~ .~ '. ~',,:~-,J~' v'.~ · .. , .......,. ~.~,,,~,~.~,,,~ .~~ ,'.~.:~'.,, ~ ,~ i.~.' H:.~ ~ .~{,.',4 .; ,[~. , ~1.~ .~ ;l~, .,...,,., ~~a ,<~. ~~.:,~;A.,,:..... ~. ~.~ ~'~'.': ~ ~ O0 ~ssu~ated ~ ~ O~dar ~~~r ~~ ShadoWbox ~ ~gea~d ~ J ~ ~ogea~ . ~ ~ ~ O~ Cedar g ~0 P~Ssu~ ~eatod ~ ~ Pressure ~ated ~OJ Shadowbox ~ ~ ~ French Gothic ~~ Dogeared ~..,~'r£ .. : ' ~ -. · . · :.-........ - 3,G.8~1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THlg MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-28-2000 HearingDate: August 24,2000 PETITIONER: Rita Femandes PUBLICATION DATE: August 9, 2000 JOURNAL/TOPICS REQUEST: Variation to consu'uc~ a 6-foot fence in an R-A District MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten Hal Ettinger Leo Floros EliZabeth Luxem Richard Rogers Keith Youngquisl Arlene Juracek. Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Judy Cormolly, AICP, Senior Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Carl & Mildred Anderson Ray Costan Dada K. Coyle Rita Femandes Frank Zavask Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. After a moti~ri by .Riehard-Kogers,,seconded .by - EliZabeth Luxem, minutes of the July 27, 2000 meeting were approved, new member, Hal Ettinger, abstai~ied from voting. At 7:35, Ms. Juracek opened Case ZBA-28-2000, a request for a Variation to construct a 6' fence in an R-A District. Judy Connoily, Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the item, a Variation to construct a 6 foot fence in an K-A District and said the case would be Zoning Board final. Ms. Connolly said that the subject property ~is an existing residence on an interior lot in a single-family residential neighborhood that has an existing four-foot fence around the perimeter of the property. She said that the applicant proposes to remove the ex,sung fence and install a six-foot wooden, perimeter fence. Ms. Connolly explained that the Zoning Code permits a five-foot .fence but the petitioner is re~luesting a six-foot fence because the petitioner has a special needs child who requires a taller, sturdier fence to ensure that the child stays in the yard. Ms. Connolly said the child's neurologist submitted a letter of support for the proposed Variation request and agrees with the petitioner's assessment that a taller fence is needed to ensure the child's safety, when he is playing tn the yard. Ms. Connolly said Staff reviewed the request with the petitioner and suggested possible alternatives to installing a six- foot fence, but the peuuoner said that the alternatives would not be as effective as a slx-foot fence. Ms. Connolly stated that staffreviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan, and visited the site. She described the subject parcel as being similar to other lots in the Village and not unique in its surroundings, shape, or topography. She said the rationale for the proposed variation is related to the oetitioner's child's quality of life. Ms. Connolly said that the proposed fence would not have a significant effect on public xvelfare or neighborhood character, but the applicant's request for a taller fence and location is based on her child's needs, and no real hardship related to the s~te exists as outlined by the Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-28-2000 Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson Page 2 Ms. Connolly reported that, based on the lack of a finding of hardship as defined by the Zonin. g Ordinance, Staff recommends denial of a Variation to install a 'six-foot wooden perimeter fence at 1104 W. Cent~l Road., Case No. ZBA-28-2000. She said that the petitioners request does not meet the standards for a Variation as defined by the Village's Zoning Ordinance. However, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) indicates that reasonable accommodations are made for individuals when ADA regulations apply. The child's doctor told staff that the ADA regulations apply to the child's situation and Ms. Connolly said that if the ZBA grants the variation, Staff recommends that the variation be conditioned te the petitioner only. She requested that provisions be made that require the six-foot fence be reduced to five-feet or removed when the petitioner moves from the property. She concluded her report by stating that the Zoning Ordinance grants the ZBA the authority, to make this requirement and that this ease is final at the ZBA level. Board members questioned how removal of the fence could be enforced in the future. Ms. Connolly and Mr. Blue said it could be enforced by recording a covenant on the deed and tracked through the Geographic Information System (GIS) or the property transfer stamp process. Raymond Carston, 23324 Robert Johnson St., St. Clair Shores, Michigan was sworn in as the petitioner's representative. He stated that he has a mentally challenged child and attested to the difficulty of keeping the petitioner's child from climbing. He stated the child is extremely hyperactive, mentally challenged and incapable of realizing the danger of busy streets and railroad tracks. He said the child is fond of trains and would try to get to them when he heard them. He stated that the petitioner was also requesting that the finished side of the fence be turned in to prevent the child from sealing the 6' fence. Chairperson Juracek informed Mr. Carston that facing the posts and rails towards the neighbors was contrary to our standards. Mr. Carston said this child was autistic and very agile. Ms. J'uracek asked how long the petitioner had occupied the home and was told that the petitioner bought the home Jul? 20. Board members questioned the wisdom of purchasing a home located on a busy street near a very busy railroad crossing, knowing that there is a problem keeping the child in his own backyard. Mr. Carston speculated that the cost of the house was in the petitioner's price range and was probably all that she could afford. In addition, Mr. Carston stated that the child is in a group home and is only in his mother's home seven, non-consecutive days per month ..... - · Ms. Luxem asked if a 5' fence, with the smooth side facing the petitioners property, would be sufficient to restrain the child. Mr. Carston said that a 6' ~ence would work perfectly and il would be more effective than a 5~ fence in preventing an unfortunate accident. Ms. Luxem asked if they had apprised the neighbors of the request and Mr. Carston said they had, and the neighbors had no objections. Board membem asked about the child's age and height. Mr. Carston said he would be twelve the next day and was approximately 4-I/2' tall. Mr. Carl Anderson, 4 N. Lancaster in Mount Prospect, was sworn in. He explained that bis property backs up to the rear of the subject property and that he objected to the 6~ height and to the rough side of the fence facing his property. Dada Coyle, 1358 Grosse Point Road in Michigan and grandmother of the child, was sworn in and said that they had driven along Central Road and saw several fences higher than 5' with the rough side facing the road. Mike Blue said that the Zoning Code permits fences along arterial roads to have the finished side toward the residential use. He clarified that the petitioner's request is to have the unfinished side facing another residence. At 8:05. Chairperson Juracek closed the Public Hearing and asked for discussion from the Board. Board members discussed many remedies to arrive at a workable solution to the request. Mr. Hal Ettinger suggested allowing the 6~ fence with the top rail to be located at 5', with the stipulation that the top 1' of the fence be removed at the time of sale of the subject property. oning Board of Appeals ZBA-28-2000 Arlene Suracek, Chairperson ;': '' ' Page 3 Ms. Luxem said that in order to be fair to the neighbors, approval should be granted only if rails and posts are covered on the neighbors' side. Ms. Juracek reopened the Public Hearing to examine the fence sample provided by the petitioner and closed the Public Hearing again at 8:20. Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval of the request for Variation to erect a 6' wooden fence with the top rail located 1' below the top (at 5'), with the finished side facing in and a shadow box pattern on the exterior of the fence, covered rails and posts on both sides; and recording a covenant requiring that the top 1' portion of the fence to be removed when the petitioner no longer lives at the subject property. Elizabeth Luxem seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Luxem, Rogers, Youngquist, and Juraeek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. At 9:25 p.m., Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned, Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary j/~d'y Co~i~ ~enior Planner ~ Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~, OO DATE: AUGUST 30, 2000 SUBJECT: HOMEBUYER'S ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Increasing affordable housing opportunities is a goal that has been highlighted in the Village's 1995 and 2000 CDBG Consolidated Plans. In an effort to address this need, a grant application was submitted to the Illinois Housing Development Authority (II-IDA) in September, 1999 to fund of a Homebuyer's Assistance program. Such a program would allow the Village to provide down payment and closing cost assistance to qualified first- time homebuyers. The grant application was denied, primarily due to our lack of experience with administering that program. In order to test the potential for this program in Mount Prospect and gain experience in running the program, the Community Development staff proposes using available Community Development Block Grant funds to run a pilot program this year. As proposed, the program would provide funds for a down payment up to $7,500, $1,500 for closing costs, and up to$1,000 for other bank fees. The loan is at a 0% interest rate and is forgiven after five years. Program participants must provide at least $1,000 toward the down payment. The program is conducted in conjunction with local banks, which process and administer the loan. We propose assisting two homebuyers through the program this year. Bank One has agreed to participate in the test program. A summary of the proposed program and letters of support collected when the grant was first requested from IH]DA are attached~ Since the program received off-hand mention in the newspaper earlier this summer, the Planning Division has received about six calls from prospective participants (although not all are known to be income eligible). Given the income restrictions for the program (household incomes no more than 80% of the Chicago area median income) the most likely ownership opportunities are for condominiums and small townhomes in Mount Prospect. To use funds from the Village's Community Development Block Grant, an amendment to the 2000 CDBG Action Plan is needed. Likewise, a budget amendment to permit $20,000 to be allocated to the program from our CDBG funds is necessary. Those funds are available due to a larger than expected CDBG grant from HUD this year and from previous carryover funds from previous grants. Per HLrD requirements, the Village Plan Commission considered amending the 2000 CDBG Action Plan to include the l:tomebuyers Assistance Program during a public hearing at their June 21, 2000 meeting. The Plan Commission was highly supportive of amending the Action Plan to include the program and recommended that the Village Board accept the program. A public comment period has been open since that time. Except for people expressing interest in the program no comments have been received; Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 5~ meeting; Staff will be present at the meeting to answer any questions related to this matter. · ' ' .~ooney Jr.,AICP /mb Village of Mount Prospect ~ DeMolvnmt Block Grant Homebuyer's Assistance Program Proposal 2000 Action Plan Amendment Introduction The dream of owning a home is a common one for many people. Homeownership can be especially difficult to achieve for low to moderate-income residents in the community. The biggest constraints for a prospective buyer are the initial down paYments and financing of the purchase. The Village is requesting that the current 2000 Action Plan be amended to include the following proposal. Proposal The Village of Mount Prospect is proposing to administer a pilot Homebuyer's Assistance Program in the community. A Homebuyer's AssiStance Program is designed to assist families in the community purchase and own their own homes with necessary down payment and closing costs provided by Village's Community Development Block Grant funds. This Homebuyer's Assistance program would allow certain families who do not have the capability to purchase and finance a new home, to do so. The Village is proposing to assist a maximum of two families as pilots for this program. Request $20,000 in funds be made available from current year (2000) Community Development Block Grant funds for the Homebuyer's Assistance program. Current allocation will not change. · A maximum of $10,000 will be allocated for each homebuyer project. · For each homebuyer project, a maximum of $7,500 will be made available for down payment assistance, $1,500 will be made available for closing cost assistance and $1,000 w/Il be used for project delivery and administrative costs. · Bank One will provide monthly mortgage financing for the homebuyer. Background As a northwest suburb of Chicago, the Village of Mount Prospect's local housing efforts and strategies are similar to its surrounding neighbors such as Des Plaines and Arlington Heights. The three suburbs share similar demographic and housing characteristics such as: · the lack of substantial developable land · housing market characteristics:/ncluding, average sales and rental prices of existing housing stock · demographic data including population figures and racial breakdowns · similar community development programs funded by the Community Development Block Grant. The Village of Arlington Heights has a Homebuyar's Assistance program that has proved to be extremely successful in the last four years. Due to the success of Ariington Heights' program, the similar housing trends which are occurring in both Arlington Heights and Mount Prospect and due to the interest for the program in Mount Prospect, the Village recommends piloting a Homebuyer's Ass/stance program using Community Developmem Block Grant funds. The pilot program will serve as a basis for determining whether a Homebuyer's Ass/stance program can be successful in the Village of Mount Prospect. During June of 1999, the Village began compilation of its Five-year Consolidated Plan. As part of this overall community development plan, the Village developed a Community De.velopment Strategic Plan which established prior/ties and objectives to be met within the next five years. The · , V~illage of Mount Prospect ~ Proposed Homebuyer's Assistance Program "Affordable Housing" priority identified Homebuyer's Assistance as a community development objective. The goal of this objective is to assist low to moderate-income residents with pumhas!ng a home. Please see Attachment 1-excerpt from the Community Development Strategic Plan· In addition to the Community Development Strategic Plan, the Village conducted a Local Housing Market Analysis as part of the Five-year Consolidated Plan. Through these studies, a great demand for the Homebuyer's Assistance program was identified due to the need for affordable housing in the Village. Without enough developable land, construction ora Iow- income housing development is not a conceivable option; therefore an assistunee program would greatly benefit the Village in housing low to moderate residents in appropriately priced housing. Please see Attachment 2-Local Housing Market Analysis. Community support from various entities has been strong throughout the development of this program. Letters of support were obtained for tbe program during IHDA's Homebuyer's Assistance application program in the fall of 1999. These letters are included as Attachment 3 to exhibit the support for the program. Program DevelOpment The planning Division of the Community Development Department developed the Village of Mount Prospect's Homebuyer's Assistance program by researching other Homebuyer programs in neighboring suburbs. The Village of Arlington Heights has administered their Homebuyer's Assistance program for the last four years with tremendous success. In addition, the Illinois Housing Development Authority (IHDA) provides grants to various communities for the Homebuyer's Assistance program. IHDA has been useful in the development of this program by providing information on implementation procedures. In addition, the Village plans to participate in II-IDA's application process for FY 2001 Homebuyer's Assistance funds. The Village of Mount Prospect would like to acknowledge the Village of Arlington Heights and the Illinois Housing Development Authority (II-IDA) for providing extensive assistance in the development of this program. Program Description The Village of Mount Prospects' Homebuyer Assistance Program provides opportunities for low and moderate-income households to own their first homes. Through this pilot program, applicants obtain private fa-st mortgages from Bank One-Mount Prospect and receive assistance from the Village with down payments and closing costs. The program was developed by the Village's Planning Division and is made possible by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development's Community Development Block Grant. Applicant Eligibility · Applieunts must be first-time homebuyers (not having owned a home in the past three years). Exceptions may be made for displaced homemakers. · Applicants' household incomes must not exceed specific year HUD income limits~ First time homebuyers purchasing a home in Mount Prospect will be assisted with down payment and closing cost assistance due to the significant barrier of these costs. Property Eligibility · Properties purchased must be within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount ~rospect. · . Vi!la~¢ of Mount Prospect , Proposed Homebuycr's Assistance Pro.gram Eligible properties are limited to single-family residences. This includes detached homes, condominiums, townh0uses, coach houses and duplexes (with split ownership). Properties must pass a Village inspection prior to purchase. Ownership shall be by fee simple title only-the property to be purchased must have a clear and free title. · Refinance transactions do not qualify for this program. The Village intends to target condominium-type dwellings for low-income persons. Prices for single family detached homes are unaffordable to many low-income persons. However, affordable detached single family homes that qualify for the program will also be considered. Based on the present real estate market in Mount Prospect, condominiums are a more viable target than any other property type. Counseling · Participants must successfully complete a homebuyer counseling and training course offered by the lending institution prior to making an offer to purchase. Ail homebuyers must attend and successfully complete a homebuyer-counseling program prior to purchasing a home through the homebuyer program. Pre-purchase counseling allows the prospective homebuyers to better understand the home buying process and alleviate many of thc fears typically associated with loan closing or settlement. The counseling sessions could include the following topics: · Selecting a home (a Realtor will be used in the home selection process). · Understanding the buying and rehabilitation process, including loan closing. · Financial costs of home ownership. Budgeting personal finances~ · Home maintenance and repaks. Terms of Assistance · Applicants must provide a minimum of $1,000 for down payment costs. · Applicants are referred by the Village to the lending institution. Applieauts must qualify for first mortgage financing from Bank One-Mount Prospect. The amount oft. he down payment/closing costs assistance loan will be based on the applicant's income and the home purchase price and is to be determined by the Village in consultation with the lender. The minimum loan for down payment assistance to a qualified applicant will be $1,000 and the maximum loan will be the amount necessary to bridge the gap between the buyer's resources and the funds needed to secure the private mortgage. The maximum amount for down payment assistance will be limited to $7,500 and the maximum amount for closing cost assistance will be limited to $1,500 and a maximum ors 1,000 will be used for project delivery costs. The down payment/closing cost assistance loan provided by the Village will be secured by a second mortgage recorded against the title to the pwperty. The loan will be a 0% interest, deferred loan. The loan will be deferred for the affordability period of five years and will be forgiven at a rate of 1/60t~ per month over the five-year period~ Recapture will be ensured by the execution and recording cfa second mortgage stipulating the recapture requirement. Village of Mount Prospect . · ~ Proposed Homebu¥¢r's Assistance Program The Village's homebuyer requirements will require the homebuyer to make a down payment contribution of $1,000. The Village feels that the requirement for the homebuyer contribution will provide greater assistance for all program parties when purchasing a home. Role of Village · Administer and oversee the Homebuyer's Assistance program. · Provide a maximum of $7,500 for down payment assistance. · Provide up to $1,500 for closing cost assistance including the following fees: credit report, appraisal, title charges, closing fees, recording fee, flood service fee, and tax service fee. · Provide up to $1,000 for project delivery and administrative fees. · Subordinate its lien position (in the form of a second mortgage) to the Banks first mortgage. · Provide its loans at 0% interest. The Village will forgive its loan in full after five years. The loan will be forgiven at a rate of 1/60' of the original principal balance at the end of each full month of occupancy of the residence by the homebuyer. · Maintain records for each home purchase for review by HUD as required by federal regulation. Role of Lending Institution (Bank One) The lender will provide pre-purehase homebuyer counseling and assist the Village in marketing the program. The lender Will provide a thirty year fixed rate mortgage with no minimum mortgage amount. The lender will ailow expanded underwriting ratios of 33/38 total monthly housing debt (including payment of mortgage, taxes, insurance, and condominium assessments) should not exceed 33% of gross ntonthly household income, and total monthly household debt should not exceed 38%; The lender will also waive certain program fees agreed to in a contract agreement with the Village of Mount Prospect. The Village will pre-select applicants based on their application and then send pre-application form to the lender to determine eligibility. The lender will provide each participant with pre-purchase and post-purchase counseling, using certified homebuyer training agencies. The lender will provide a homebuyer training class, at a location to be announced. The lender will provide a certificate of completion of homeowner counseling to all participants. The Bank further agrees to pafldeipate in the program in the manner summarized below: · Make a total of at least $200,000 in first mortgage funds available to participants of the program, which is the anticipated aggregate amount needed for the program. · Provide mortgage loans that are 30 year fixed rate loans for up to 95% of the purchase price of the home. Buyers will be required to provide down payments of at least $I000 of the purchase prices from their own funds. · Set no minimum loan amount for this program. · Allow a front-end ratio (monthly housing costs as a proportion of gross monthly income) up to 38%. · Accept nontraditional credit histories. · Charge no points on the loans. Village of Mount Prospect Proposed Homebuyer's Assistance Program · Waive the requirement that borrowers have a two-month reserve for principal, interest taxes and insurance. Furnish the Village, at each closing, a final report including the mount of the first mortgage, an itemization of the amount of the bank's contribution to the purchase, and other loan application and documents requested by the Village. · Provide each participant with pre-purchase and post-purchase counseling. · Assist the Village in marketing the program. · To manage the collection of its own loans. · In the event the loan recipient defaults on the mortgage, the Bank agrees that the Village will not be responsible for recovering the funds or for repaying that portion of the mortgage extended by the Bank. Conclusion The Village of Mount Prospect is proposing to administer a Homebuyer's Assistance program for the first time in the community. The proposal is to allocate funds from the current year Community Development Block Grant for a pilot program that would allow a maximum of two participants. According to local housing studies, research and current regional housing trends, demand for the program exists. A pilot will serve to determine whether the program is indeed suited for the community and if the program will be beneficial in the Village's overall community development goals. A Homebuyer's Assistance program will assist low to moderate-income families purchase a home in the community. Initial down payments, closing costs and mortgage financing are the common barriers to affordable housing for low to moderate-income families who want to purchase a home. The Homebuyer's Assistance program would provide these down payment and closing costs as a deferred loan, meaning the loan will be entirely forgiven after the five-year loan term. Bank One's partnership in the pilot program will Provide financing and counseling to the homebuyer. A Homebuyer's Assistance program in the community will help to alleviate barriers to affordable housing in Mount Prospect. With few options available to alleviate barriers, this program would at the least provide the option to purchase a home for low to moderate-income families. The Homebuyer's Assistance program is a wonderful opportunity to provide for families who are trying to make their dream of homeownership come true. \\VI-BV02~DEPT~COMDEVSGEN~LNG\CDBG~-Iomebuyers assitance\program summary.doc 5 B~nk One. NA I~ihk One L~U] South ~eyer~ ~, Sl.~. ~00 31, 2~0 MS. Mist7 Das NeighbodlOOd Planner Village of Mt. Prospect CommunE7 Development Re; 2000 ~Test Pilot Assi~,,=~ce Program Prcpo~l Dear Ms. Das, Fimt of all, we would like to t~k you for giving Bank One an opportunit3/to be part of a very worthwhile initiative. We are in the business of providing mo~gages and expanding homeownership opportunitieS, in all the communities that we serve and your proposal for the 2000 ASSistance Prograr~ would aid us in fost~ing our efforts. For the 2000 ~Test Pilot Ass~tance Program, we propose the following: · Waiver of current standai'd application fee to ~lualified borrower(s) for lf~e year2000. · Make a total of at least ~. 00,000 in first mortgage funds available to quarried borrower(s). · Zero point mortgage loar~s at standard 30-year fixed tale, up to ~5% Loemto-Value with fle,x~le quar~fying ra~...'os of 33 / 3~. Will accept over mUos with strong compensating f*,ac;ors. · Closing costs assoclated~**with crc, dE report, appraisal, ~le charges, closing fees, recording fees, flood set,ce fee and tax service fee to be capped at $1,500. · Non-traditional ctedit histories wfll be acceptable. · Will provide assistance t~ the Village in marketing the program. * · Bank will provide pre-purchase counseling ufi]iz~ng ttte FannieMae ' A Guide to Homeowners,hip' as we[l~s partnering with an accredited counseling agencY in providing homo buying e~.' uc~--'Jon to program pa~cipan~.* · Dedicated Loan Officer ~ meet the participants needs; We ate looking forward to a ~ery rewarding partnership. ~/. ~VP/(~3mmunity Liaison Cfficer VP/Market Se{es Manager September 28, 1999 Village of Mount Prospect I00 S. Emerson Street Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056 Illinois Housing Development Authority: As a Real Estate Broker in the Village of Mount Prospect, we are firmly behind such programs as the proposed "Homebuyer's Assistance Program". We truly believe and support all programs that help the less privileged to be able to afford to purchase their own home. We therefore would appreciate the IHDA's granting assistance to the Village of Mount Prospect for this program funding. ' ~e~s Ryo~ in advance, _ P.E/MAX Suburban I~F/~ suburban 330 e. northwest highway, suite 100 mt. prospect, Illinois 60056 phone: (847} 57~-9888 fax: (847) 577-5034 CAROLYN H. KRAUSE September 27, 1999 Ms. Misty Das, Neighborhood Planner Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Planner 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Ms. Das: I was delighted to hear that the Village of Mount Prospect is applying for a grant through the Illinois Housing Authority to administer the Homebuyers Assistance ' Program in Mount Prospect as part of its Affordable Housing Year 2000 ' . Consolidated Plan. This is a worthwhile program that will enable low income residents the opportunity to purchase their own home. It is my understanding that Mount Prospect is implementing this program based on the experience of the Village of Arlington Heights. I am familiar with the success of Arlington Heights' program because that community is also a part of my legislative district. Because the price of housing has accelerated at such a rapid rate, it is difficult for many citizens to accumulate enough capital for the down payment and closing costs involved in the purchase of a home. The Homebuyers Assistance program - provides hard-working residents with the help they need to make the dream of home ownership a reality. I know from the personal acknowledgments of Arlington Heights constituents who have participated in the program, that the screening process is very rigorous so that only those who are serious and show a real willingness to adhere to the guidelines of the program will be eligible to participate. aving established home ownership engenders pride and involvement in the community; this makes the program successful for both the municipality providing assistance and to the recipient who now becomes more involved and productive in the community. It is a winning combination all the way around. I give my wholehearted support to the Village of Mount Prospect to administer this excellent Homebuyers Assistance Program. Very Truly Yours, Carolyn H. Krause State Representative September 29, 1999 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to acknowledge my support of the Village of Mount Project's grant application being submitted to tho Illinois Housing Development Authority. I beUeve this grant application has merit and the need for such a program in Mount Prospect is well deserved, I strongly support the Village of Motmt Prospect in this endeavor. Very truly yours, I-tH:pk¢ DhtHct O~Oc~: ~ ¢ommittc¢~: ~b'.:~t Iliq~lina Roud ~ Scbaum~Irg, I/lim~ta g01.95 ~ La~e & Comm~e ~47/R82.0270 ~, ~: Consumer ~l~cllon Pequot R~latlon Capitol Of Oce: , Springfield. tllinoi~ ~2~ ffrban Revitalization :lr~*:.o.~r State of Illinois House of Representatives Terry R. Parke Stat, Rep~entatiw · 53~ District October ~, ~999 Mr. Michael Rose Acting Director & Liaison Illinois Housing Development Board 401 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Chicago, IL 60611 Dear Director Rose: I am writing to recommend that the Village of Mount Prospect receive favorable consideration for federal HOME funds in order to initiate its Homebuyer Assistance Program. ~.: . , ::, .,~.... ~.....~ ~.. ,:-. This program will target seniors wh(/'(i) ~'re~/~t-time buyers, and (ii) have a Iow/moderate income. The required down payment an'd costs associated with " purchasing a home is a significant harder to affordable housing in Mount Prospect. Local banks will help homebuyers with reducing costs and monthly mortgage payments by offering a fixed rate interest; In addition, the program will address homebuyers counseling and home maintenance education. It is exciting to see such an innovate program planned for Mount. Prosect and I am hopeful that the necessary funding will be provided so the Village may provide this Opportunity to oui- senior citizens wishing to'become first-time homeowners. Thank you for your favorable consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Terry R. Parke State Representative TRP:sb cc: Hon. Gerald L. Farley Ms. Misty Das ILLINOIS STATE SENATE KATHLEEN K. PARKER STATE SENATOR · 29TH DISTRICT September 22, 1999 Michael Rose Illinois Housing Development Authority 401 N. Michigan Avenue Suite 900 Chicago, Illinois 60611 Dear Mr. Rose: : I am writing to express my support for a grant for the Village of Mount Prospect to administer a Homebuyers Assistance Program. The goal of this program is to help low to moderate income residents purchase affordable housing. The required down payment and costs associated with purchasing a home are a significant barrier to affordable single-family housing in Mount Prospect. This program aims to help alleviate those barriers. The Village will work closely with local banks to offer programs with reduced monthly mortgage costs and fixed rate interest. There will also be homebuyer counseling available and home maintenance education. Eligible homebuyers will have incomes equal to or less than 80% of the area median income, will be first-time homebuyers or seniors. In addition, they must be able to qualify.'for first mortgage financing fi'om a source other than the HOME program. HOME program money will be used solely for down payment and closing cost assistance. The HOME loan will be a 0% interest loan for up to 5 years. I hope that you will give every cousidei'afion to this grant application as I believe it has many merits. Homeownership brings stability to not only to our communities but also to our families. Thank you in advance for your consideration. SincereJ. y, Kathleen [~. Parker State Senator 29~' District SECECTCOMMI~EE ON ETHICS September 27, 1999 Ms. Mis~ D~ I00 South Eme~on Mount Prospect, IL 60056 l ~ ~ting today N suppo~ of~e ~t appUcation ~c Village ofMo~t ~t sub~ to ~e ll~ois No~g Devclopm~t Au~ofi~ to admi~stcr ~c ~omebuyer's ~sis~cc N Mo~t Prospect for ~ 2~0. ~e ViUagc o~Mo~t ~o~cct ~or~ble ho~g ~ i~ 2000 co~o~dat~ pl~. I believe ~at ~e Hom~buyer's ~sist~ce ~o~ ~I1 accomplish yo~ go~s of~sis~g [ow/mode~te-income res/den~ ~ ~or~ble hom~g. ~s pro~ ~I1 also ~sist required do~ pa~nt ~d costs ~at ~ ~sociated ~ a s~gle f~ily home ~ Mo~t Prospect. ~e costs often se~e ~ a b~er to p~ch~g a s~gle f~ly home. .. Homebuy~'s ~sist~ce pro~ ~I1 offer eH~ble c~dates ~e oppo~ to p~c~e a home ~ Mo~t Pro~t. ~ you ~ow, ~e pro~ is ~ s~ by ~c ViSage ofMo~t ~ect who ~H be wor~g closely ~ loc~ b~ to pw~de ~e best ~sist~ce possible for homebuy~ Mo~t Prosper. Specific~y, b~ ~I1 h~lp homebuyers ~ r~uc~g cost ~d reduc~g mon~ly mo~gage pa~en~ by offing a ~ed ~terest rate. ~e pro~ ~11 ad&ess homebuyem co~e~ng ~d home m~t~ce education. Ag~ I would l~e to empire my's~Pog for yo~ app~ca~on to Development Au~ofi~ ~d ~sh you ~e b~t of luck ~ou~out ~e ~t approval precis. V~ ~ly yq~, ~ch~d J. D~bin U~ted States Semtor R.[D/sd bc 9/1/00 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CREATION OF THE FIRST TIME HOMEBUYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WHEREAS the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect ("the Village") have determined that it is in the best interests of the Village to initiate a First Time Homebuyers Assistance Program ("the Program"); and WHEREAS, the Village has listed the creation of affordable housing, specifically home ownership opportunities, as a top pdority in its 2000 Consolidated Plan; and WHEREAS, the Village has garnered the support of local lending institutions to administer and financially support the Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT: SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees do hereby authorize the creation of a First Time Homebuyers Assistance Program as detailed in Exhibit "A." SECTION TWO: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of September, 2000. Gerald L. Farley Mayor A'i-I'EST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\G EN~Ie$\WIN\RES\I st-tirne-horC~bu yem*program.doc Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DEPUTY CHIEF R. DATE: AUGUST 15, 2000 ·: SUBJECT: DISPOSAL OF OLD RADIOS With the implementation of the new digital trunked 800 Mhz emergency radio system, the department's old police radios have become obsolete. The attached inventory includes 139 radios of varying age and value. As these radios are Village property, I would like some direction on their disposal. Our options regarding the disposal of these radios are threefold; sell them, give them away or destroy them. Doug Edmonds is accepting inventories from all the NWCDS police departments and will attempt to act as a clearing house for the sale of the radios to other law enforcement agencies. We also have received a few requests (NIPAS, Schools) for some of the radios as a donation to another law enforcement or governmental agency. I recommend working with Doug to sell the radios as a first choice and then donating the best of the remaining radios to qualifying agencies. Please advise on how you want to proceed and if a disposal ordinance is necessary at this time. Attachment RR/jab c: Chief Pavlock D ...a,4e_ 1 - Document3 MPPD OLD RADIO INVENTORY MAKE: MODEL: RADIO #: SERIAL #: COMTRONIX COMMXII 059 01702 COMTRONIX COMMXII 058 01714 COMTRONIX COMMXII 057 01989 COMTRONIX COMMXII 056 02058 MOTOROLA AA16742 1312006024 MOTOROLA AA16742 1312013554 MOTOROLA EXPO 001 446AKE2126 MOTOROLA EXPO 002 446AKE2127 MOTOROLA EXPO 003 446AKE2128 MOTOROLA EXPO 446AKG1670 MOTOROLA EXPO 446AKG1698 MOTOROLA EXPO 006 446AKG1699 · ' ;: MOTOROLA EXPO 446AKG1700 MOTOROLA EXPO 050 446ALA0813 MOTOROLA EXPO 051 446ALA0814 MOTOROLA EXPO 052 446ALA0815 MOTOROLA EXPO 053 446AL01274 MOTQROLA EXPO 054 446ALC1275 MOTOROLA EXPO 055 446ALC1276 MOTOROLA EXPO 111 446AML1210 MOTOROLA EXPO 112 446AML1211 MOTOROLA EXPO 113 446AML1212 MOTOROLA EXPO 114 446AML1213 MOTOROLA EXPO 115 446AML1218 MOTOROLA EXPO 116 446AML1219 MOTOROLA EXPO 117 446AML1220 MOTOROLA EXPO 118 446AML1221 MOTOROLA EXPO 119 446AML1222 MOTOROLA EXPO 120 446AML1223 MOTOROLA EXPO 121 446AML1224 MOTOROLA HT1000 141 401AWUH053 MOTOROLA HT1000 124 402AUW1396 MOTOROLA HT1000 125 402AUW1397 MOTOROLA HT1000 126 402AUW1398 MOTOROLA HT1000 127 402AUW1399 MOTOROLA HT1000 128 402AUW1400 MOTOROLA HT1000 129 402AVJD489 MOTOROLA HT1000 130 402AVJD490 MOTOROLA HT1000 131 402AVNK740 MOTOROLA HTI000 132 402AVNK741 MOTOROLA HT1000 133 402AVNK742 MOTOROLA HT1000 134 402AVNK743 MOTOROLA HT1000 135 402AVNK744 MOTOROLA HT1000 137 402AW J7251 MOTOROLA HT1000 140 402AW J7253 MOTOROLA HT1000 138 402AW J7255 MOTOROLA HT1000 136 402AW J7259 MOTOROLA HT1000 139 402AWS6017 MOTOROLA HT220(2) D25 K34J66 MOTOROLA HT440 044 432AJC0093 Tuesday, August 08, 2000 8:16:59 AM MPPD OLD RADIO INVENTORY MAKE: MODEL: RADIO #: SERIAL #: MOTOROLA HT440 043 432AJC0094 MOTOROLA HT440 045 432AJC0095 MOTOROLA HT440 046 432AJC0096 MOTOROLA HT440 047 432AJC0097 MOTOROLA HT440 048 432AJC0098 MOTOROLA HT440 049 432AJC0099 MOTOROLA MT1000 080 749ANU1457 MOTOROLA MT1000 081 749ANU1458 MOTOROLA MT1000 082 749ANU1459 MOTOROLA MT1000 083 749ANU1460 MOTOROLA MT1000 084 749ANU1461 MOTOROLA MT1000 085 749ANLJ1462 MOTOROLA MT1000 086 749ANU1463 MOTOROLA MT1000 087 749ANU1464 - . MOTOROLA MT1000 , 088 749ANIJ1465 MOTOROLA MT1000 08'9 749APL1550 MOTOROLA MT1000 090 749APL1551 MOTOROLA MT1000 091 7'49APL1552 MOTOROLA MT1000 092 749APQ1387 MOTOROLA MT1000 093 749APQ1388 MOTOROLA MT1000 094 749APQ1389 MOTOROLA MT1000 098 749AQJ3640 MOTOROLA MT1000 104 749ASC0716 MOTOROLA MT1000 105 749ASC0717 MOTOROLA MT1000 106 749ASC0718 MOTOROLA MT1000 107 749ASC0719 MOTOROLA MT1000 108 749ASW0444 MOTOROLA MT1000 109 749ASW0445 MOTOROLA MT1000 110 749ASW0446 MOTOROLA MTS00 015 411ACL0019 MOTOROLA MTS00 017 411ACL0020 MOTOROLA MTS00 065 41lACY0939 MOTOROLA MTS00 018 411ADC0729 MOTOROLA MTS00 019 411ADC0730 MOTOROLA MTS00 020 411ADC0731 MOTOROLA MT500 030 411AEL1688 MOTOROLA MTS00 027' 411AEL1689 MOTOROLA MTS00 028 411AEL1690'~ MOTOROLA MT500 411AEL1691 MOTOROLA MTS00 031 411AEL1692 MOTOROLA MT500 026 411AEL1693 MOTOROLA MT500 032 411AEN0859 MOTOROLA MTS00 066 411AEU0789 MOTOROLA MTS00 100 411AEU0794 MOTOROLA MT500 067 411AEU0797 MOTOROLA MTS00 102 411AFQ1172 MOTOROLA MTS00 009 411AFQ1668- MOTOROLA MT500 005 411AFQ1669 MOTOROLA MT500 008 411AFQ1670 MOTOROLA MT500 012 411AFQ1671 MOTOROLA MT500 021 411AFQ1672 MOTOROLA MT500 024 411AFQ1673 MOTOROLA MT500 034 411AFQ1675 Tuesday, August 08, 2000 8:17:00 AM MPPD OLD RADIO INVENTORY MAKE: MODEL: RADIO #: SERIAL #: MOTOROLA MT500 033 411AFQ1676 MOTOROLA MT500 041 411AGN0659 MOTOROLA MT500 042 411AGN0660 MOTOROLA MT500 035 411AGN0661 MOTOROLA MT500 036 411AGN0662 MOTOROLA MT500 038 411AGN0664 MOTOROLA MT500 039 411AGN0665 MOTOROLA MT500 040 411AGN0666 MOTOROLA MTS00 103 411AGQ0158 MOTQROLA MT500 022 411AGQ0159 MOTOROLA MT500 099 411AGQ0161 MOTOROLA MT500 101 411AGQ1021 MOTOROLA MT500 023 411AKQ1021 MOTOROLA MT500 037 411AKQ1022 MOTOROLA MT500 060 411AL J0726 ·" MOTOROLA MT500 061 411ALL0913 MOTOROLA MT500 062 411ALL0914 MOTOROLA MT500 064 411ALW0411 MOTOROLA MT500 063 411ALW0412 MOTOROLA MT500 074 411AMY0430 MOTOROLA MT500 073 411AMY0431 MOTOROLA MT500 075 411AMY0432 MOTOROLA MT500 071 411AMY0433 MOTOROLA MT500 076 411AMY0434 MOTOROLA MT500 077 411AMY0435 MOTOROLA MT500 072 411AMY0435 MOTOROLA VlSAR-H053DD9 123 720AUG4265Z MOTOROLA VlSAR-H053DD9 122 720AUG4276Z SHINWA SH41P 078 4H24296 SHINWA SH41 P 079 4H24299 YAESU FTH2070 095 8N020175 YAESU FTH2070 096 9C040380 YAESU FTH7005 070 7E040132 YAESU FTHT005 068 7E040133 YAESU FTH7005 069 7E040134 YAESU FTHT008 097 9M041111 Tuesday, August 08, 2000 8:17:00 AM V~NL 8~30/00 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, it has been determined that it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain ownership of the personal property hereinafter described, and previously used by the Mount Prospect Police Department; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect to make available for pdvate sale, or donation to other law enforcement agencies, any of the personal property as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: Pursuant to its Home Rule power, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the personal property described in the attached Exhibit "A" now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, is no longer necessary or useful to the Village of Mount Prospect and the best interests of the Village will be served by its sale or donation to other law enforcement agencies. SECTION TWO: The Village Manager, or his designate is hereby authorized and directed to privately sell or donate the aforementioned personal property now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, to other law enforcement agencies, immediately upon passage of this Ordinance.. SECTION THREE: Any remaining items shown on Exhibit "A" may be disposed of by the Village Manager or the Manager's designate in a manner which is in the best interests of the Village. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: " PASSED and APPROVED this day of September, 2000. Gerald L. Farley, Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk H:~G EN~files~,W~ N~ORDINAN C~DIsp o se o~ prop-police radios.doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY JR., DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: AUGUST 31,2000 '~., SUBJECT: QUICK-TAKE AUTHORIZATION Attached to this memorandum is an ordinance that authorizes the use of quick-take condemnatYWn~o"~gedin, g~ to acquire the rear portion of the Ye Olde Town Inn property at 18 W. Busse Avenue. This Ordinance is necessary to allow the Village to move forward with the acquisition of this property, which is the last parcel necessary to complete the Residences at Village Centre project. As you will recall, the Village Board previously adopted Ordinance #5082 authorizing the purchase or condemnation of this property ands more recently, the Illinois General Assembly authorized the Village to use quick-take eminent domain for this purchase. Staff has been negotiating the purchase of this property with the property owner, Tod Curtis, but has been unable to reach a settlement to date. Please forward this memorandum to the Village Board for their review and consideration at the September 5 meeting. Staffwill be present at that meeting to fgrther discuss this matter. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTItORIZING TIlE USE OF QUICK TAKE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 WEST BUSSE AVENUE (YE OLDE TOWN INN) WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois have heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 5082 authorizing the purchase or condemnation of property located at 18 West Busse Avenue, Mount Prospect, Illinois ("Subject Property") for the purposes of implementation of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is empowered, pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 1LCS 5/11-74.4-1 et. seq., as amended, to acquire by purchase, donation, lease or eminent domain real property within the redevelopment project area; and WHEREAS, the authority to exercise its powers of eminent domain required in order to condemn or purchase the sites for the Downtown Redevelopment Plan are contained in both the Illinois Revised Statutes and the home rule ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect, and WHEREAS, the General Assembly in 735 ILCS 5/7-103 et. seq., ("quick-take statute"), has authorized the use of quick-take eminent domain proceedings by the Village of Mount Prospect for redevelopment purposes; and WHEREAS, the acquisition of the Subject Property legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof for the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, requires the exercise of the Village's quick-take eminent domain power; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that it is necessary, advantageous, desirable and in the best interests of the Village to adopt the development schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that it is necessary, advantageous, desirable and in the best interests of the Village to authorize and approve the use of quick- take eminent domain to acquire the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, as follows: Section 1: The President and Board of Trustees hereby incorporate by this reference the recitals set forth above and adopts them as its findings and conclusions. Section 2: The development schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B and providing, inter alia, for the acquisition of the Subject Property for the Downtown Redevelopment Plan is hereby adopted. Section 3: It is hereby found and determined that it is necessary, advantageous, desirable and in the best interests of the Village to acquire all right, title and interests to and possession of the Subject Property, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which property is necessary, required and needed on an expedited basis for the development ora portion of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Section 4: That the Village Manager, Village Attorney and the law offices of Ryan and Ryan, Special Attorneys for the Village of Mount Prospect, be and are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate and enter into an Agreed Judgment Order on behalf of the Village with the owner or owners of and other persons interested in the Subject Property for the acquisition thereof by the Village, and all actions and negotiations heretofore undertaken by Ryan and Ryan to acquire such properties are hereby ratified. Section 5: That in the event that said law firm is unable to agree with the owner of the Subject Property as to the compensation to be paid therefor, and the timely possession thereof, then fee simple title to and possession of the Subject Property shall be acquired by the Village through use of quick-take condemnation proceedings and the law office of Ryan and Ryan, as attorneys for the Village, is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to institute quick-take condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to and possession of said subject property for said Village through the exercise and use of "quick-take" powers pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/7-103, as amended, through 5/7-112, in accordance with the eminent domain laws of the State of Illinois and the ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect. Section 6: This Ordinance and each of its terms shall be the effective legislative act of a home rule municipality without regard to whether such ordinance should (a) contain terms contrary to the provisions of current or subsequent non-preemptive state law; or (b) legislate in a manner or regarding a matter not delegated to municipalities by state law. It is the intent of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect that, to the extent that the terms of this ordinance should be inconsistent with non-preemptive state law, said terms shall supersede said state law to the extent of said inconsistency. Section 7: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES; NAYS; ABSENT; PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ,2000 Gerald L. Farley Village President Attest Velma Lowe Village Clerk Exhibit A Parcel One The South 1.11 Feet of the West 37.37 Feet of Lot 2, in Mount Prospect Central District Subdivision, Being a Subdivision of Part of the West Half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Prineipal Meridian, Recorded December 23, 1949, as Document 1275902, and That Part of Lot 4 in Said Subdivision Lying North of the Westerly Extension of the Southerly Most Line of Said Lot 2, In Cook County, Illinois. Said Property Containing 2323 Square Feet, More or Less. PERMANENT TAX INDEX NO. 08-12-102-028 Parcel Two Ail of the 10.00 Foot Private Alley Lying North of and Adjoining the South Line of Lot 2, in Mount Prospect Central District Subdivision, Being a Subdivision of Part of the West Half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, Recorded December 23, 1949, as Document 1275902, in Cook County, Illinois Parcel Three Lot 3, in Mount Prospect Central District Subdivision, Being a Subdivision of Part of the West Half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, Recorded December 23, 1949, as Document 1275902, in Cook County, Illinois PERMANENT TAX INDEX NO. 08-12-102-029 Exhibit B Schedule for Acquisition September 1, 2000 - All properties for the Downtown Redevelopment AcquirEd FROM: MICHAEL J. FIGOLAH, FIRE CHIEF DATE: AUGUST 28, 2000 SUBJECT: PICKUP TRUCK BID The Fire Department has developed specifications and received bids to replace a 1989 Chevy Caprice. This vehicle is used by the fire protection engineer to attend meetings and conduct fire/sprinkler inspections and tests during the workday. This vehicle has 83,000 miles and was scheduled for replacement in 1999; however, we were able to extend the life an additional year due to good condition. Currently, there is a need to have a vehicle that is able to tow trailers and handle general hauling of equipment and supplies. Rather than considering an addition to our vehicle inventory, I would like to replace the current sedan with a pickup truck, which can fill both needs: This pick-up truck will have a crew cab, which will allow usto transport personnel to water rescue incidents while pulling the dive trailer and various other incidents. BUDGET AUTHORIZATION Funding for the replacement vehicle is provided in the 2000 Budget in the Capital Improvement Section on page 293. The account number is 677709-660120. The budgeted amount is $25,000.00. GENERAL BID INFORMATION On July 31, 2000, at 10:00 AM, sealed bids were received for the purchase of a 2001 pickup truck. The sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud. There were a total of 15 bids mailed out to truck dealers. SUMMARY OF BIDS RECEIVED A total of five (5) bids were received for the purchase of a pickup truck: H:~Archives\08 August\MF-Pickup Truck Bid Results~VM.doc TO: VILLAGER MANAGER SUBJECT: PICKUP TRUCK BID AUGUST 26, 2000 PAGE 2 BIDDER BID PRICE Springhill Ford $30,271.00 Hoskins Chevrolet $31,500.00 Lattof Chevrolet No Bid The following disqualified bids were received after the 10:00 AM deadline on July 31, 2000: Olympia Ford $31,900.00 Freeway Ford $30,595.00 RECOMMENDATION .... Since the bid amounts are over the budgeted amount we removed the 4-wheel drive and the diesel engine option. Removing these 2 options from the Iow bid brought the price to $24,232.00. I recommend that the contract be awarded to Springhill Ford for an amount not to exceed $24,232.00. MF/jm INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS ~1~'[ ~ FROM: WATER/SEWER SUPERINTENDENT DATE: AUGUST 30, 2000 SUBJECT: SEALED BID RESULTS FOR WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS: MCC REPLACEMENT AT BOOSTER PUMPING STATION NO. 16, 1629 W. ALGONQUIN ROAD Background In the current budget, funds are available to continue our Motor Control Panel Replacement Program. The work planned for this year includes replacing the electrical motor control center (MCC) at Booster Pumping Station No. 16, which was installed in the early-1970's. Station No.16 is located in an industrial park at 1629 W. Algonquin Road. NIES Engineering, Inc. of Hammond, Indiana was hired by the Village to develop the detailed, technical specifications and bidding documents necessary to properly install the replacement MCC. In addition, NIES has provided bidding assistance and has been retained to provide project administration. Bid Results On Tuesday, August 22, 2000 at 10:00 AM, sealed bids for the procurement of materials and professional services necessary to effect the electrical MCC replacement at Booster Pumping Station No.16 were opened and read aloud. Invitational bids were distributed and public notice was posted in a local newspaper as required. Three (3) bids were received. The bid results are as follows: Engineer's Ridgewood Adlite Electric OKEH Electric Estimate Engineering Company Company $112,000 $87,181 $88,025 $118,650 NIES Engineering has evaluated all bids and identified Ridgewood Engineering Inc., of Schiller Park, Illinois as the lowest qualified bidder. Ridgewood Engineering Inc. has satisfactorily performed previous MCC replacements for the Village of Mount Prospect and come well recommended. age 2 .... Booster Sta. 16 MCC Replacement August 30, 2000 Discussion In the past three (3) years we have replaced MCCs in Booster Station No.4, at Waverly and Prospect Avenue, Booster Station No.5 on Highland and Emerson, and at Booster Station No.11 located in the Mount Prospect Park District golf course. This will be our fourth MCC in as many years. MCC replacements result in many benefits to the Village. These include; increased dependability of high lift service pumps and associated equipment, reduction in the parts inventory, and savings on electrical usage. Also, due to the age of the existing control centers, replacement parts are either not available or obsolete. Bid Recommendation I concur with the recommendation of NIES Engineering that a contract to perform the work specified in the Project Manual for the MCC replacement at Booster Pumping Station No. 16 be awarded to Ridgewood Engineering Inc. for an amount not-to-exceed $87,181. Funds for this proposed project is available in the current budget under account number 6105505-670038 on page 248. Roderick O'Donovan I concur, D~of Pul~lic Works, Glen R. Andler ROD attachment ~;: Dicector of Public Wc~ks, Glen Andler Deputy Director of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey File INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER CHUCK LINDELOF DATE: AUGUST 30, 2000 SUBJECT: 2000 CDBG SIDEWALK PROGRAM On August 29, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., sealed bids were received for the 2000 CDBG Sidewalk Program. At that time, the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The project consists of the installation of handicap accessible sidewalk ramps at all intersections within the area south of Lincoln Street, north of Lonnquist Boulevard, and east of Elmhurst Road to the western limits of the Village. BIDS RECEIVED Three (3) Contractors received Contract Bid Documents, and all three (3) s.u.bmitted bids. The bids ranged from a Iow of $36,260.00 by Rai Concrete, Inc.; to a high of $63,737.50 by Alliance Contractors, Inc. The Engineer's Estimate for the-project was $49,097.50. ANALYSIS OF BiDS The bids were checked, and no errors or discrepancies were found. All bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 5% of their total bids as required by the Contract Documents. All bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. BIDDERS TOTAL BID Raj Concrete, Inc. $36,260.00 G. & M., Inc. $49,790.00 Alliance Contractors, Inc. $63,737.50 Engineer's Estimate $49,097.50 (The Iow bid is 26% lower than the estimate.) age 2 Sidewalk Ramp Program; Recommendation of Contractor August 30, 2000 QUALIFICATIONS OF LOW BIDDER The Iow bidder, Raj Concrete, Inc., of Carol Stream, Illinois, is prequailified by the Illinois Department of Transportation for projects up to $500,000.00, and adequately completed the 1999 CDBG Sidewalk Program. RECOMMENDATION The Village budget for this project is $50,000.00. The Iow bid is $13,740.00 lower than the budget allotment. I recommend that the Iow bidder, Rai Concrete, Inc., be awarded the contract for the 2000 CDBG Sidewalk Program in the amount not to exceed $50,000.00. The $13,740.00 above the Contractor's bid price would be utilized to take advantage of the Iow unit prices submitted, and expand the program to include additional locations. Funding for this project is under Account Code 0702306-640009 ($50,000) on page 147 of the 2000 Budget, Please place this in line for consideration and approval at the September 5, 2000 Village Board Meeting. I concur with the above recommendation. Director of Public Works X:\FILES\E N GINE ER\PROJ ECTS~SID EWALK~000\CDBG\Recommend.doc VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER "'~ ~, FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: AUGUST 30, 2000 SUBJECT: CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH SDI CONSULTANTS FOR STREETSCAPE STAT[ON AREA SERVICES SDI Consultants, Ltd. have been working with Village staff on two projects over the course of this year. One is Phase II of the Downtown Streetscape program, which is currently in final design and will be under construction next year. Construction was delayed from this summer s'mce it included parts of Emerson Street and Northwest Highway already highly congested due to [DOT's work on Route 83. The second project is a redesign and resurfacing of the train station drop-off area and streetscape improvements round the station. Over the course of the work, certain opportunities have lead to changes in the scopes of the projects, which necessitate a change in the contracts between the Village and SDI. This memo expla'ms those project changes and requests Village Board approval of revisions to the contracts under which the projects are being conducted. The projects and contract changes are described below: Downtown Streetscape Engineering services for Phase II of the Downtown Streetscape program were approved by the Village Board on December 21, 1999. They included designs, construction documents, and construction oversight of streetscape improvements along Busse (from Maple to Emerson), Emerson (from Maple to Northwest Highway) and Northwest Highway (from Emerson to School). The total design/engineering contract amount was $88,485. The design phase of that project is complete. According to SDI, preparation of construction documents is 25% complete and permit coordination (with IDOT) has begun. Construction will begin next spring. The proposed change to this contract is to conduct the same design/engineering tasks for Phase III of the streetscape program. That area would include the east side of Wille Street from Busse Avenue to Central (~n front of the Norwood building currently under conslruction) and the sidewalk surrounding the Lofts and Shops at Village Centre. This phase of the streetscape program is in keeping with the original intent of the program to install the streetscaping following redevelopment of downtown sites. As you will recall, the Downtown Streetscape Program includes replacement of existing sidewalks with brick pavers, repair/replacement of curb and gutters and provision of handicap accessible ramping, installation of parkway plantings, pedestrian street lights, holiday lights, park benches, trash receptacles and consideration of a passive park area. The Downtown Streetscape Program Phase III is estimated at approximately $425,000, and is set aside in the Downtown TIF budget for 2001. SDI's proposed cost for Phase III design/engineering is $61,145. This includes preliminary designs, construction document preparation, and construction oversight. Conducting this design/engineering work as an add-on to SDI's contract is beneficial due to economies in combining the projects under the same consultant in the same construction year. The two projects will be permitted through IDOT and sent to bid together, meaning that there are not additional charges for those activities in the Phase III budget. In addition, SDI's experience with previous projects in Mount Prospect has provided them a good understanding of the Village's needs for this project. The cost of the consulfmg services (as well as all anticipated construction for 2001) will be paid out of the Downtown Streetscape Program line item listed on page 286, account # 557703-690059 of the 2000 Village Annual Budget. In addition, we are continuing to pursue state grants to offset the costs of these improvements. A grant application to the State's TEA-21 Enhancement program is pending for that area. The outcome of that application is expected in the Fall. ONTRACT AMENDMENTS WITH SDI CONSULTANTS August 30, 2000 Page Two Train Station Area The Train Depot Block contract with SDI was approved by the Village Board on March 7, 2000 in the amount of $29,454. The project included studying alternative lrafflc flows for the train station drop-offarea, a streetscape design for the surrounding sidewalk and parkway areas, development of construction documents, and overseeing construction. As part of that work, SDI has also been of assistance to the Village in working with IDOT to coordinate final details on the location of some signals and control boxes related to the Route 83 reconstruction. In the time since this project was initiated, the Village has received grants from several sources that have allowed a more comprehensive approach to improving the train station area. The available funds are: Legislative Add-on Grant $130,000 Surface Transportation Program $130,600 Operation Green Light $400,000 Total $660,600 These grants will cover the cost of the improvements on the train station block, as well as possible minor redesign and resurfacing of parking lots along Northwest Highway to facilitate better traffic flow and upgrade of the collection system. Total anticipated cost of these improvements is approximately $660,000. Engineering costs beyond the original contract, proposed at $49,600, would be paid for out of the Village's Parking Fund. Summary Project Engineering Status of Construction Source of Funds Costs Engineering Costs (Est.) Engineering/Construction Streetscape Phase II $88,485 In Progress $440,000 TIF/TiF (grant pending) Streetscape Phase IH $61,145 Proposed $365,000 TIF/TiF Train Station Area $29,454 In Progress $400,000 Parking Fund/State Grants Train Station add-on $49,600 Proposed $260,000 Parking Fund/State Grants As noted above, the train station projects and Streetscape Phase llI would be designed, permitted, sent out to bid, and constructed at the same time. Therefore, there are efficiencies and costs savings in the permitting, bidding, and constmction management aspects of the project by continuing to work with the same consultant. Therefore, we recommend that the Village Board authorize an amendment to the Streetscape 1I contract with SDI Consultants, Ltd. to include design/engineering work for Phase III of the Streetscape program in the amount of $61,145 and un amendment to the Train Depot Block contract to include additional work at the train station in the total amount of $49,600. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 7th meeting. Staffwill be present at the meeting to answer any questions related to this matter. XII. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT C. Police labor agreement memorandum will be distributed on Tuesday, September 5, 2000 Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Slrect Mount Prospect, IIlino s 60056 ,. SEPTEMBER 6~ 2000.'MEETING OF,THE PLAN. BEEN CANCELLED. AN ~kGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO M~ETING. this 30th clay of August, 2000.