Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7. MANAGERS REPORT 09/01/2009 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department Monnt Prospect MEMORANDUM ~ FROM: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '!>f:) · H-r&, ~'l') lozt TO: DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2009 REQUEST FOR FACADE REBATE REIMBURSEMENT - YE OLDE L WN INN RESTAURANT SUBJECT: The Village has established the Fac;ade Rebate Program in the downtown Tax Increment Financing District that offers matching grants to businesses that make improvements to storefronts in the downtown district. The maximum Village contribution is $10,000 per storefront. The owner, Tod Curtis has been renovating his building at 6-18 W. Busse Avenue over the past several months. He has made several improvements to the interior of the building to address code violations. These improvements include a complete renovation of the kitchen area, an upgrade to the electrical service and the correction of several plumbing violations. The owner has also addressed several exterior code violations as part of his reinvestment in the property. The total project costs are estimated at over $200,000. Mr. Curtis is seeking reimbursement for all eligible expenses related to his project. The Village has historically considered a storefront to be up to 25' in width when considering a request for reimbursement. Mr. Curtis' building measures 100 feet wide along Busse Avenue thereby qualifying as 4 storefronts. In his application, he requests reimbursement for both his front and rear facades as he indicates that both elevations are exposed to public view. Therefore his request is for $80,000. While the Village has never reimbursed for fac;ade improvements to the back service area of a structure, Mr. Curtis will make his case to the Village Board at the February 1 th meeting. Per the program guidelines, the Village may cover 50% of all eligible costs of this project, up to $10,000 per storefront. The Village currently has budgeted $60,000 in account # 5507703-590052 (page 294 of the Budget) for the 2009 budget year. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their February 1th meeting. Staff will be at that meeting to answer any questions related to this matter. M,bl~n~ THE VALENTINO LA WFIRM Richard A. Valentino Attorney at Law 101 N. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD. Suite 100 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS 60004 (847) 577-8674 Telephone (847) 577-9045 Facsimile January 27, 2009 Village of Mt. Prospect Bill Cooney, Director Department of Economic Development 50 S. Emerson St. Mt. Propsect, IL 60056 RE: Fa~ade Grants - 6,8,10,12.14,18 W. Busse Ave. Dear Bill: I have attached a copy of the summary of recent YOTI improvements in support of Tod's Application for Fal;ade Grants that you had requested that we provide in our meeting of January 13,2009, along with a new Fa~ade Application, which, as far as I can tell, is nearly identical to the old application, at least as far as the information that is requested. The only noticeable difference from old to new appears to be in the instructions and in the signature page. Along with the new application, I am submitting receipts and the Summary of improvements that you had also requested in our meeting. My understanding from what I was told by you in our meeting is that this Summary and the signed and completed F~ade Grant Application is all that is required to be considered for this Fa~ade Grant. I have also included many receipts with the application, which you have stated would be kept in your file for information purposes, but they would not be part of the Fa~ade Grant Application that would be submitted to the Village Board. You will note that I have submitted the application on the basis of 25 linear feet per storefront as you had suggested, but that I have included both the North and South Elevations, as both elevations have been renovated and both are exposed to public view. I do understand that the Application must be approved by the Village Board, and I am assuming that it will be for the Village Board to determine how much it will award to Tod, and they will increase or decrease the amount as they deem appropriate without us needing to submit an amended application. Eg. another measure might be one fa~ade grant for each street address, of which there are 7). Also, it was not made clear at our meeting whether or not there would be a need for Tod or his representative to appear at a Village Board Meeting to receive, and\or to answer questions regarding his application. Please let me know what the protocol is in these regards so that I can make the necessary arrangements. Sin~ __ ~~ino RA V\jv Enc Facade Grants for 6..8..10..12..14..16 and 18 W. Busse Ave. The Curtis property has approximately 200 linear feet of "frontage" (This includes both the North and South elevations, as both elevations are clearly visible to downtown visitors and\or residents.) We are requesting a full $10,000.00 grant for each 25 linear feet for a total of8 grants of$10,000.00 each. The following work has already been done: Electrical Improvements: At the Villages request., complete electrical system upgrades for the entire building which affects all storefronts in equal proportions were done by AlI- A-Electric Co.: Sums expended = $43,000.00 Interior and Exterior Improvements: At the Villages request, ex"tensive improvements have been made by Gatto Construction Company, both to the interior, and to both the South and the North exteriors, including but not limited to the South Elevation fayade, the North elevation fayade and porch area: Sums expended = $37,636.85 Interior and Exterior Improvements: At the Villages request, extensive improvements have been made Artistic Creation Design LLC to the interior and to both the South and the North exteriors, including but not limited to the South Elevation fayade, the North elevation fayade and porch area: Sum expended to date = $70,000.00 The following work remains to be done: Interior Improvements: Kitchen Remodeling. The permanent kitchen for YOn is undergoing complete renovation. Complete and detailed plans have been submitted for Village permits and approval. Plumbing Improvements: At the Village's request there have been, and continue to be extensive plumbing system upgrades for the entire building which affects all storefronts in equal proportions. In addition, at the Villages request, additional repairs and improvements are being made to the roof and to the South elevation soffits and to the North Elevation parking lot and delivery area. TOTAL SUMS ALREADY SPENT TO DATE: in excess of$150,636.85 TOTAL ADDITIONAL SUMS TO BE SPENT: $75,000.00 - $150,000.00 + or- TOTAL AMOUNT REQUl:STED: = $80.000.00. ($10,000 per 25 linear feet x 8, for a total of 200 linear feet of storefront.) APPLICA TION z o ..... r-< ~ ~ 0' "" ~ ~ .~ ~ .E Z II> ~c.. 0' ~ ~ u -< = Z o ..... r-< -< ~ ~ o ~ ~O .....>. ~t: Z II> ~g. OQ:: ~I ~ U -< = Name (bO ~TI~ Corporation /) _ fL-t..o /V5t j4./M7AJT- ~~ft- Street Address /J /tj It). I7k~S'~ City /h7: !~!~.f T lA,1J'Tk. Mobile Zip Code b:JO t? .5b f~fl-'t 1\~d.,J;.N. N~~ ~ .5:cJt &,t --. Number of storefronts in the building and occupants 7-"6 SLbQ~"\-s./' 2-QO \.\t.)e~'- Relations7i to Property t$.9~~ .Ilf!!.! "i' (' -- ,0'" (.. ;). t. ..:::> -zc:: ..:> '4 ~W\ l^{\ Ai 1\4.--rl71b:t rt [') Name Telephone (day) &D Clrl j Corpora~on IIJJ ~f(7i fI'l G--/lI,T": Street Address 8 /J / I eB . ~.5"S'L m -L-_ City .p State /Y)T /~vr U!& rL Zip Code 6'Pt/~b Architect's Name & Ad~ss , II 02- Wit's Ire fIf fAt- ~~~ ~t.. ()ti~ Con ctor's Nl!,me &.Addres}-'7,. J '3 ~"E.. fk t k ,en.s tic u,7 'ffl~ . Eng~er's Name & Address (if applicable) I. ;[v'/ z'l/f",-,Jea 'rI "'J/:fJ1t~ http:// www.mountprospect.org/business/DescApplicationTIF.doc October 2007 APPLICANT AFFIDAVIT I have read and understand the terms of the Fa<;ade Improvement Program and Interior Build- out Program and agree that all work performed in conjunction with the aforementioned programs must comply with all other Village regulations. Additionally, I understand and will comply with all annual sales tax reporting requirements. October 2007 http:f f www.mountprospect.orgfbusinessfDescApplicationTIF.doc MountProspect ~ Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE: AUGUST 26, 2009 SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC POST-STUDIES RECOMMENDATION TO lURE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT - $8 Baclmround The Neighborhood Traffic Study involves reviewing intersection traffic control and speed lImIts on all Village-owned streets. To accomplish this, the Engineering Division has divided the Village into eighteen (18) areas called "zones". To date, the Engineering Division with the assistance of a traffic consultant have completed comprehensive studies in all eighteen zones including recently completing sign changes in the [mal four zones. We have also presented [mal post-study results to the Village Board of Trustees for four zones and anticipate presenting fmal post-study results for seven additional zones in the near future. This would leave performing [mal post-studies for the final seven zones over the next year to complete the Neighborhood Traffic Study. There are two components to the Neighborhood Traffic Study. The first program, the Residential Speed Limit Program, involves reviewing all neighborhood streets to determine the appropriate speed limit. The other program, the Residential Intersection Traffic Control Program, involves reviewing neighborhood intersections to determine the proper traffic control and then evaluating previously studied neighborhoods through post-studies. Because of the complexity of this program, the Village has in the past retained the services of a traffic consultant to perform the intersection traffic control studies and post studies. In reviewing the work necessary to complete such studies, the Engineering Division continues to believe it is necessary to hire a traffic consultant to complete the remaining post-studies in a reasonable amount of time. 2009/2010 Contract Work over the next year will only involve performing post-studies in seven zones previously studied. Post-studies near the 6-month and 12-month marks after implementation will take place to assure the changes have created a safe and efficient environment. KLOA Inc. of Rosemont, Illinois has provided consulting services for the Village since the beginning of the Neighborhood Traffic Study. The Engineering Division, therefore, provided a Request for Proposal to KLOA Inc. to perform post-studies in seven previously studied zones. It outlined that the scope of KLOA Inc.'s services were to include data collection, analysis, recommendations and representation at various public meetings. Vehicular volume and speed data would be collected using traffic counters, accident data would be reviewed, and visual inspections would be made at each intersection. This information would then be compared to the data collected as part of the original traffic study in the neighborhood. Based on the results, the consultant would affirm the previous decisions or recommend further changes to the traffic regulations as necessary. Because of the sensitive nature of the original studies and the impact to the neighborhoods, multiple post-studies would be done in each zone. This would allow the Village to closely monitor the traffic in those zones previously studied. For each zone, the first post-study would be page 2 of3 Traffic Consultant Recommendation August 26, 2009 a comprehensive look at the entire neighborhood. Subsequent post-studies would focus only on locations that are considered to demand extra attention in the zone. The tables below shows the schedule to complete the post-studies associated with this contract. F" t P t S d 6 M th Aft S" Ch Irs os- tu v- on s er I~n an2es .. ... Submit Submit Data Collection Draft ReDort Final Report Zone 1 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010 Zone .2 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010 Zone 3 September 2009 November 2009 December 2009 Zone 4 September 2009 November 2009 December 2009 . Zone 5 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010 . Zone 6 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010 Zone 10 September 2009 November 2009 December 2009 . S d P S d 12 M h Ati S" Ch econ ost- tu Iy - ont s 'ter 12n an2es Submit . Submit Data Collection Draft ReDOrt Final Report . . Zone 1 May 2010 July 2010 August 2010 . . Zone .2 May 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Zone 3 April 2010 June 2010 July 2010 Zone 4 Apri12010 June 2010 July 2010 ZorieS May 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Zone 6 May 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Zone 10 April 2010 June 2010 July 2010 Discussion KLOA Inc. has partnered with the Village for the past four years on this project. Thus far, they have studied all eighteen (18) zones and performed post-studies in eleven (11) zones. Their work has met the expectations of the Engineering Division and been done in a professional manner. They have provided quality reports, met deadlines and represented the Village well at public meetings. KLOA Inc. has provided the Village a price of $84,500.00 to complete post-studies for the fmal seven (7) zones. Two post-studies would be performed in each of the zones. The fIrst post-study would review all intersections and streets in each zone. In order to keep costs down while still being able to closely monitor the changes and providing a informative report, the second post-study in each zone will target up to 25% of the original study locations. The locations will be determined based on known sensitive areas and the results of the fIrst post-study. Should additional work be necessary in a particular zone, the Engineering Division will consider negotiating a price with KLOA Inc. or performing the work ourselves. Comparing KLOA Inc.'s price to their average price for post-studies from their previous contracts, they have lowered their price per intersection from $363 to $361. Their price includes data collection, analysis and recommendations which would all be detailed in a report. It also includes various meetings with the Engineering Division and attendance at Village Board Meetings. With the Village Board of Trustees approval of this work, KLOA Inc. would begin immediately collecting data for the post-studies. page 3 of3 Traffic Consultant Recommendation August 26, 2009 Recommendation It is my recommendation that the proposal submitted by KLOA Inc. for traffic engineering services be accepted with a not to exceed amount of $84,500.00. There are sufficient funds in the 2009 Village Budget to cover the scheduled work for this year. And in the 2010 Proposed Budget, there would be sufficient funds to cover the remaining work in the contract. Please include this item on the September 1 sl Village Board Meeting Agenda. I concur with the above recommendation. Attachment: Map h:\engineering\traffic\ritcp\2009rfp\vb _rec. doc VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~ VILLAGE TRAFFIC ZONE MAP 7 8 9 12 11 LINCOLN Sf 14 15 Z :::> o ::< GOLF RD 17 STUDY SCHEDULE &l w g o '" ~ '" '" :::> I ~ w . D ~ L-J I SEMINOlE LN 1 o 2 o '" '" w > c;; 5 POST STUDY SEPTEMBER 2009 - JULY 2010 1--0 '1'~ ~~... "'0 l('J: -1)- Q~ 18 POST STUDY OCTOBER 2009 - AUGUST 2010 INCLUDED IN PREVIOUS CONTRACT OAKTON ST THIS MAP IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING THE: RESIDENTIAL SPEED LIMIT PROGRAM & RESIDENTIAL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROl PROGRAM Mount Prospect TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS ~II~ WATER & SEWER SUPERINTENDENT AUGUST 27, 2009 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RESULTS FOR SANITARY SEWER FLOW MONITORING (NOT TO EXCEED $50,000) Background During the 1980s, the Village of Mount Prospect conducted a comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study (SSES) designed to identify and eliminate excess clear water (rain water) from the Village-owned separate sanitary system. Activities included in this effort were the closed-circuit television inspection of sewer mains, flow monitoring to identify wastewater flow rates, and the inspection of plumbing systems in private buildings. This study was a consequence of Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC) mandates and federal rule-making prompted by the Clean Water Act of 1972. In summary, the MWRDGC had determined a wastewater flow threshold they felt justified their plans to develop treatment plant capacity. Flows in excess of this threshold were deemed comprised essentially of clear rain water that did not need to be filtered through wastewater treatment plants. Accordingly, MWRDGC directed all wastewater systems tributary to its treatment plants to eliminate excess clear water or take steps to prevent it from entering separate sanitary sewer systems. Consequently, following completion of the initial SSES work, the Village began an extensive separate sanitary sewer rehabilitation project that included spot repairs of sewer mains, chemical grouting of sewer main joints, lining of sewer mains with cured-in-place pipe (CIPP), reconstruction of manholes, and the elimination of improper private sector plumbing connections (sump pumps, downspouts, etc.). Once this rehabilitation work was completed, flows in the Village-owned separate sanitary sewer system were again measured and a post rehabilitation flow rate of 673 gallons per capita per day was established. This rate was incorporated into the Long Term Maintenance Agreement signed by the Village and the MWRDGC in 1991. This agreement essentially committed the Village to performing specified sewer maintenance and improvement activities necessary to limit wastewater flows to the post rehabilitation flow rate (673 gallons per capita per day). Problem Statement Since 1991, the Village has made substantial efforts to comply with our MWRDGC commitments. Specifically, to date the Village has installed over $5 million worth of cured-in-place lining, rebuilt over 1,500 sewer manholes, televised over 275,000 lineal feet of separate sanitary sewer mains, and inspected over 5,750 private buildings for improper plumbing connections. Most notably, over $17 million worth of flood prevention and sewer improvement work has also been completed. Unfortunately, staff has lacked the resources (flow metering equipment) and personnel (technicians and analysts) necessary to accurately assess the performance of our separate sanitary sewer system as it relates to the post rehabilitation flow rate. Page 2 of 3 Request for Proposals Results for Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring August27,2009 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS To correct this problem and to comply with MWRDGC requirements to annually monitor the Village's flow rate, staff devised a request for proposals designed to procure the services of a qualified engineering firm to assist with the comprehensive flow monitoring of the Village-owned separate sanitary sewer system. Specifically, staff envisions a 3-year contract in which approximately 15% of the separate sanitary sewer system is monitored during the wet weather seasons each year. Presently, the Village has 53 separate sanitary sewer basins. Approximately 8 basins will be targeted for flow monitoring each year of the three-year contract. The RFP also includes provisions for the collection of necessary weather information (rainfall, etc.) and detailed investigation of the data. Results Proposals were received on August 24, 2009. Five (5) invitations were distributed to qualified consultants. Three (3) proposals were received. The results to monitor 22 basins over the next three years are as follows: CONSULTANT COST PER METER PER WEEK Elan Technologies! Bums & McDonnell $265 Baxter & Woodman $485 Bums & McDonnell * ABH Donohue ** ESI K-Plus Environmental $583 Bums & McDonnell and Elan Technologies joined together to offer their services to the Village. ASH Donohue declined offer to submit a proposal citing their workload and that they have contracts with the MWRDGC that may present a conflict of interest.. * ** Discussion In 2005, the Village awarded a three-year agreement to a joint venture between Elan Technologies of New lenox, Illinois (formerly known as Elan Industries) and Bums & McDonnell Engineers of Oak Brook, Illinois. Elan Technologies is a purveyor of fluid flow monitoring equipment and services. They are not an engineering firm and lack the in-house capabilities to perform the required post-processing analysis of the flow metering data. However, for this project they have again partnered with Bums & McDonnell engineering consultants of Oak Brook, Illinois. Bums & McDonnell has provided engineering services to the Village including the highly successful effort to remove private homes for the regulatory flood plain along the Des Plaines River and MacDonald Creek. Burns & McDonnell has also assisted the Village with the preparation of USEPA-mandated water system vulnerability assessments, water modeling and emergency response plans. Their performance has been satisfactory in all circumstances. In addition, Elan Technologies continues to use the services of Mr. Joe Zurad, P.E., as a special advisor on this project. Mr. Zurad is the retired Chief Engineer of the MWRDGC and holds intimate knowledge of the District's flow monitoring protocols and requirements. It is the opinion of staff that Elan Technologiesl Bums & McDonnell Engineering are well-qualified to fulfill the performance requirements of this proposed project. Page 3 of 3 Request for Proposals Results for Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring August27,2009 Project Protocols It is relevant to note that the flow metering process specified by the MWRDGC is based on a minimum of a 1" rainfall during a 24-hour period. Consequently, the term of the monitoring period is highly dependent upon weather and is substantially beyond our control. Furthermore, it is also relevant to note that the MWRDGC stipulates that flow monitoring should only be conducted during the wet weather seasons (April 15 - June 30 and September 15 - November 30) during which groundwater tables are at their highest levels. There are approximately 11 calendar weeks in each of these wet weather periods. Consequently, it is feasible that the wet weather seasons can expire without recording a qualifying rain event (1" in a 24-hour period). This is the reason that the RFP uses a three-year period in order to address the variability of the weather. Staff intends to prosecute this project by installing flow meters during the wet weather periods and removing them immediately after receipt of a qualifying rain event. However given the parameters noted above, the length of this monitoring period and ultimate cost can be highly variable during any given year. For example, it is feasible that all 8 flow monitors could be installed for a maximum of 22 weeks in order to record the effects of a 1 inch rainfall within a 24-hour period. If this circumstance occurs, the total fee payable to Elan, the lowest responsive consultant, would be $46,440 (8 meters x 22 weeks x $265 per meter). Under no circumstances will flow monitoring costs exceed authorized budgets. Meters or monitoring weeks will be reduced in order to control expenditures. Recommendation I recommend accepting the proposal from Elan Technologies and Burns & McDonnell to perform the 3- year separate sanitary sewer flow monitoring project (2009-2011) in an amount not to exceed $50,000 during the first year. The value of work in subsequent years will be limited to the approved budgeted funds for flow monitori ng. Sufficient funds for this proposed work exist in the current budget. ~,\\a)\ C~'e/i2Q~ Matt Overeem I concur. Glen R. Andie Director of Public Works Cc: Deputy Director of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey Water/Sewer Superintendent Matt Overeem File Septermer 2009 Phase III of the Prospect Meadows Water System Improvements Continues The Village is request- ing that all homeown- ers in the Phase 3 pro- ject submit a com- pleted and signed Tem- porary Construction Easement form prior to the transfer of water services from the old main to the new main. This effort will require that the contractor work on private property. The Temporary Construction Easements grant the Vil- lage and the contractor permission to perform the necessary water service work outside of the Vil- lage rights-of-way. This form has been mailed to each affected property owner, is available on the Public Works website at www.mountprospect.org or can also be obtained by calling Public Works at 1-847-870-5640. Prospect Meadows area, including the abandonment of the ex- isting backyard water mains and the installa- tion of new watermains in the street right-of- ways. The Mount Prospect Public Works Depart- ment is installing 5,250 lineal feet of 8, 10, and 12-inch watermain to replace the older 4-inch watermain located in the backyards. The work will also include the addition of fifteen hydrants to im- prove fire protection in the neighborhood. This project will also feature the reinstatement of ap- proximately 66 water service lines. All of this work is to take place in the Prospect Meadows subdivision. ~~II'C- <. ~j~ r~~~_ .9 ~ ,,_ ;i't' fTV ~41 ;. (,. ~If ",~~1 '.~~". ~~J ~ ""f~~.~..:..-= ~> ~ -- J J, J ~ .0..::1,:: .,* The contractor, Martam Construction of Elgin, Illinois was awarded the contract to perform the water main improve- ments. The contractor is planning an acceler- ated schedule for this project and he hopes to begin work the week of August 24th and sub- stantially complete all work by Thanksgiving 2009 with site restora- tion completed by March 2010. This project is the third phase of the water main improvement project. With the completion of this phase 3 work, the Village will have re- placed all 8,100 lineal feet of water main in the Timeline . Contractor to mobilize during the week of Au- gust 24, 2009 . Contractor to start work on Bob O'Unk Road and Forest then through For- est Park, along Rand Road and along the west side of Prospect Manor down to Kensington Road. Figure 1 depicts the current conditions in Prospect Meadows Phase 3 area. The water mains are in- stalled in backyard easements. Figure 2 depicts how the new water mains will be installed. . Water service change- overs to begin November 2009 I I I I I I I I Existing : Woler Moln I / I . Site Restoration to be completed by March 2010. Elllrtll'lll WIl.r Servlco .... Old..... muJMd.... lei ~.......".. The Contractor will store materials such as piping, hydrants along the streets during the pro- ject, so please be cau- tious of the materials and equipment along the roadways HELP KEEP THE AREA SAFE As with all construction sites, they are not play areas for children. Please do not let your children play unattended during construction or in the construction work areas. Please help keep your family and your neighbors safe by report- ing all suspicious activity to either Public Works or the Police. ~ Contact Info Public Works: · 1700 W. Central Rd Mount Prospect. Il · Ph: 847.870.5640 . Fax: 847.253.9377 . Email: l1.ublicworks@ rT)oJ!MPJoJRect.oIg Page 2 5 C ..J CD Q. III ::E g en ell s:. o Euclid Av Wlmbollon Or c a: N Euclid Av PROJECT LOCA TION f ....\ , 1 \ Stratford PI \ \ RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER o ~ ?;' c c 9 Cl l! 2' ~ a: w o >- o \ c / ~ 0: > <( 11 ::l s:. E iIi Kensington Rd ~ iii 11 ~ ::s ]j Iii Iii U) s:. en ., .!! Z E ::s c ~ :ii w 0: 0: ~ Location of Prospect Meadows Phase III work QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? If you have any questions or would like additional information about this pro- ject, please visit our project website at www.mountprospect.org. You can also contact Matt Overeem, Water Superintendent at the Mount Prospect Public Works Department at 1-847-870-5640 or via email movereem@mountprospect.org. ++++++++++++++++++++ DO YOU HA VE AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGA TION SPRINKLER SYSTEM, PRIVA TE ELECTRIC LINES OR AN INVISIBLE PET FENCE? If you have underground sprinklers or an invisible dog fence installed on your property, please contact Public Works immediately so that the contractor can be alerted before excavation begins. These types of buried systems cannot be seen from above ground and the survey team may have missed your system. In order to prevent any incon- venience to you or your pets, please call 1-847-870-5640.