Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/24/2026 P&Z Agenda PacketVillage of Mount Prospect Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda 50 S. Emerson St. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 September 24, Village Hall - 3rd Floor Board Room 7:00 PM 2026 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. PZ-22-26 / 50 S Emerson Street / Text Amendments (Distribution centers, cartage, courier, parcel distribution, and last -mile delivery facilities) 2.2. PZ-20-26 / 50 S Emerson Street / MP2040 Comprehensive Plan 3. NEW BUSINESS 3.1. PZ-24-26 / 300 S Elmhurst Avenue / Signage Variations - TO BE CONTINUED TO THE OCTOBER 8, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. 3.2. PZ-16-26 /Mount Prospect Plaza (990-1145 Mt. Prospect Plaza, 940-950 E. Rand Road, 1200-1220 E. Central Road, 802 E Rand Road) /Preliminary & Final PUD, Preliminary &Final Plat - TO BE CONTINUED TO THE OCTOBER 8, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. 3.3. PZ-21-26 / 1714 Larch Drive / CU: Setback Reduction for Accessory Structure (Deck) / PZ Final 3.4. PZ-11-26 / 409 Hi Lusi Avenue / CU: Setback Reduction for Attached Garage / VB Final 3.5. PZ-13-26 / 1 E. Rand Road / CU: Car Wash / VB Final 4. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD 5. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS 6. ADJOURNMENT ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 8471392-6000, EXTENSION 5307 Page 1 of 455 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-22-26 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: Hearing Date: August 27, 2026 50 S. Emerson Street Village of Mount Prospect August 12, 2026 REQUEST: Text Amendments to modify Chapter 14 to add distribution centers, cartage, courier, parcel distribution, and last -mile delivery facilities as a conditional use, and other chapters of the Village of Mount Prospect Village Code as may be required. MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Donnelly William Beattie Ewa Weir Walter Szym cza k Michael Fricano Fay Costa MEMBERS ABSENT: Donald Olsen Richard Rogers STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Hogan -Senior Development Planner Jason Shallcross - Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Village of Mount Prospect, Petitioner Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at7:01 PM. Chairman Donnelly moved onto Item Two, Approval of Minutes. Commissioner Weir made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on August 13, 2026. The minutes were approved 5-0 (Vice Chairman Beattie abstained). After introducing the first item of new business, Chairman Donnelly introduced case number PZ-22-26, Village of Mount Prospect, text amendments for distribution centers, cartage, courier, parcel distribution, and last -mile delivery facilities as a conditional use. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — August 27, 2026 PZ-22-26 Page 2 of 455 Director Shallcross stated that, as part of a recent zoning case, the Village Board directed staff to reevaluate how the Zoning Code regulates distribution centers as a primary use in response to complaints regarding the impacts of such facilities when located in close proximity to residential neighborhoods. Director Shallcross explained that staff is seeking a positive recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission on proposed text amendments that would modify how these uses are regulated. Director Shallcross noted that distribution centers are currently permitted by right on properties zoned 1-1 Limited Industrial District. Under the proposed amendments, distribution centers would remain an allowable use within the 1-1 District but would require conditional use approval by the Village Board following review and a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Director Shallcross clarified that the proposed conditional use requirement would apply specifically to facilities where parcel distribution is the primary use. Director Shallcross further distinguished these facilities from traditional warehouses or manufacturing businesses that conduct deliveries as an accessory component of their operations. Director Shallcross explained that the proposed amendments are intended to address large-scale, last -mile distribution facilities, which may have hundreds of employees, generate significant delivery and vehicle activity, and operate extended hours, particularly during peak periods such as the holiday season. Director Shallcross further explained that these operational characteristics can result in greater impacts when such facilities are located near single-family residential neighborhoods and form the basis for the proposed text amendments before the Commission. Director Shallcross went on to present the new use category: Distribution center, cartage, courier, parcel distribution, and last -mile delivery facility which is defined as a facility where the receipt, transfer, sorting, routing, staging, consolidation, deconsolidation, redistribution, or dispatch of packages, parcels, goods, merchandise, or other materials for subsequent distribution or delivery constitutes a principal function of the premises. Such use includes facilities where goods are received by truck or other commercial vehicle and subsequently transferred, whether directly or following temporary storage, to other vehicles for further distribution or delivery. Associated activities may include temporary storage or staging of goods; cross -docking; sorting; fleet parking; vehicle or trailer staging; fleet management; and dispatch operations. A facility meeting this definition shall be classified as such notwithstanding that it may also meet the definition of a warehouse or other permitted use. The receipt, storage, distribution, or delivery of goods that is subordinate to and conducted in direct support of another principal use, such as manufacturing or retail, shall be considered accessory and shall not independently constitute a distribution center. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — August 27, 2026 PZ-22-26 Page 3 of 455 Director Shallcross presented a slide that showed that the current distribution center use would be struck as a permitted use and be made as its own standalone use category as a conditional use. Director Shallcross further stated that it was necessary to modify the Village's definition of a warehouse to be more complementary to the proposed definition of a distribution center. Director Shallcross stated that the new definition of "Warehouse, storage" would now be defined as: a building or portion thereof principally used for the storage of goods, merchandise, materials, or commodities, where such storage, rather than the sorting, transfer, redistribution, dispatch, or delivery of such goods, constitutes the principal function of the facility. Director Shallcross concluded that staff finds that the proposed text amendments align with the Village's standards contained in the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance, and that staff requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt Staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: 1. "To adopt the text amendments to Chapter 14 of the Mount Prospect Village Code." Director Shallcross stated that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Vice Chairman Beattie asked whether the property associated with the previous zoning case at Wolf and Kensington Roads (1600 Bishop Court) would be affected by the proposed text amendments. Director Shallcross explained that, regardless of whether the proposed text amendments are approved, the ordinance previously approved for that property requires any future distribution facility to undergo an approval process and receive Village Board approval pursuant to the Planned Unit Development (PUD). Director Shallcross clarified that the proposed text amendments would establish a consistent approval process for distribution facilities proposed on all other I-1 Limited Industrial properties throughout the Village. Commissioner Weir asked for clarification regarding the definition of distribution facility and whether businesses involving construction materials, lumber yards, building supplies, electrical supplies, or appliances would be classified as distribution facilities under the proposed text amendments. Director Shallcross responded that the Zoning Code has a separate use category for contractors' storage yards which principally involves the storage of outdoor materials and that the Village also has supplemental regulations for the storage of outdoor materials. Commissioner Weir asked how the existing distribution centers would be treated. Director Shallcross stated that the existing distribution centers would be grandfathered in and would be considered existing nonconforming and would be allowed to continue; however, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — August 27, 2026 PZ-22-26 Page 4 of 455 4 if the use were to vacate the premises for a period of more than six (6) months, a new distribution center user coming in would be required to seek conditional use approval. Commissioner Weir asked whether there would be any exemptions for small-scale distribution facilities. Director Shallcross responded that the proposed text amendments do not include an exemption based on square footage; rather, the classification would depend on the principal use of the facility and would be evaluated on a case -by -case basis to determine whether shipping and distribution activities constitute the principal use or are accessory to another primary use, such as an office. Vice Chairman Beattie asked how many existing distribution facilities would be considered Legal nonconforming uses under the proposed text amendments. Director Shallcross stated that the Village has several such facilities, ranging from approximately 100,000 square feet to significantly larger sites encompassing multiple acres. Director Shallcross noted that newer facility on the south side of the Village is approximately190,000 square feet, while another facility on the north side is approximately 100,000 to 150,000 square feet. Director Shallcross estimated that there are fewer than ten such facilities currently operating within the Village and added that the Village has received complaints regarding some of these existing facilities and that, moving forward, the proposed amendments would allow the Village to more carefully evaluate these uses and their potential impacts. Commissioner Costa asked whether a distribution center handling hazardous materials would be classified as a different use and whether the proposed text amendments should reference other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code. Director Shallcross stated that he did not believe any additional text amendments would be necessary. Depending on the nature of the operation, a facility handling hazardous materials could potentially fall under a different use classification, such as Heavy Manufacturing. Director Shallcross further explained that hazardous materials are addressed through the performance standards applicable to the 1-1 Limited Industrial District, which regulate matters including hazardous materials, noise, vibrations, emissions, etc. Director Shallcross stated that the presence of hazardous materials does not, by itself, result in a separate use classification, provided that the materials are handled in compliance with all applicable Village codes and regulations. Hearing no further comments or questions, Chairman Donnelly closed the hearing and asked for a motion to approve the conditions as noted in the staff report. Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion and Commissioner Costa seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Weir, Beattie, Fricano, Costa, Donnelly NAYS: None The Planning and Zoning Commission gave a positive recommendation (6-0) to the Village Board for the September 15, 2026 meeting. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — August 27, 2026 PZ-22-26 Page 5 of 455 After hearing one more item of new business, Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens to be heard. Hearing no further discussion, Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak and the meeting was adjourned at 8:13 PM. Ann Choi, Senior Development Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — August 27, 2026 PZ-22-26 Page 6 of 455 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-20-26 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: August 27, 2026 50 S Emerson St Village of Mount Prospect July 24, 2026 A recommendation to the Village Board on adoption of the MP2040 Comprehensive Plan. Joseph Donnelly William Beattie Michael Fricano Ewa Weir Wa lte r Szym cza k Fay Costa Donald Olsen Richard Rogers Jason Shallcross — Director of Community & Economic Development Charlie Hogan —Senior Planner Village of Mount Prospect. Petitioner Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:14 PM. Chairman Donnelly moved on to Item Two, Approval of Minutes. Vice Chairman Beattie made motion seconded by Commissioner Weir to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on August, 2026. The minutes were approved 5-0 with Vice Chairman Beattie abstaining. After the first item of business, Chairman Donnelly introduced case number PZ-20-26, 50 South Emerson Street, the Village of Mount Prospect's MP2040 Comprehensive Plan. Page 7 of 455 Staff Presentation Mr. Hogan gave a presentation providing an overview of the Plan (attached for reference), including its purpose, the process used to develop it, community engagement findings, the Plan's vision statement, its six topic chapters and goals, and the implementation matrix. Mr. Hogan explained that a comprehensive plan is the Village's official statement of long- range policy, typically updated on a 7- to 10-year cycle, and answers what kind of community Mount Prospect wants to be in the future and how to get there. He reviewed a short history of the Village's planning efforts, beginning with the first comprehensive plan in 1965 and followed by major updates in 2007 and 2017; MP2040 builds on the 2017 plan while addressing issues that have emerged in a post -pandemic environment. Mr. Hogan emphasized that the Plan is an advisory framework and future land use guide rather than a regulatory document. It does not function as a zoning map and does not obligate the Village to any specific project; any zoning code changes would still go through the standard public process. He described the Plan as a decision -making tool and reference point for future development. Mr. Hogan reviewed how the Plan was developed, beginning in spring 2025 with existing conditions research, followed by identification of issues and opportunities, community engagement, visioning, and drafting, with adoption targeted for summer/fall 2026. He noted the process included roughly 1,200 points of engagement, 665 in -person conversations, 565 survey responses, approximately 3,000 unique website visits, and 25 official meetings. Mr. Hogan summarized the community engagement findings: 91 % of respondents are satisfied living in Mount Prospect, 74% would walk more with improved sidewalks and trails, 87% consider preserving green space very important, and 50% support policies to improve housing attainability. He noted that residents generally like their neighborhoods as they are but want more housing choice, walkability, and reinvestment, and stated that the Plan's vision statement is its most important element, since it informs all of the goals and policies that follow. Mr. Hogan explained that the Plan is organized into six chapters totaling 40 goals: Land Use, Housing & Neighborhoods, Commercial & Industrial Areas, Transportation & Mobility, Community Facilities, and Parks & Environment. Each goal is shaped by community input, staff research, and policy direction from community leadership. On Land Use, Mr. Hogan described it as the heart of the Plan. Because the Village is largely built out, growth under the Plan means targeted reinvestment in specific sites and corridors rather than expansion, while protecting the single-family neighborhoods that make up most of the Village. Goal 1 is to protect neighborhood character while focusing development in key areas; incremental housing variety would be encouraged only in specific locations rather than across established neighborhoods. The Plan envisions Randhurst becoming a more dynamic destination for dining, entertainment, walkability, Page 8 of 455 and housing, if pursued by ownership, and calls for guiding the evolving future of office and industrial areas affected by the shift to remote work during COVID-19 toward more diverse uses. The Plan identifies 51 subareas and opportunity sites (vacant, underutilized, or nonconforming due to annexation history)with potential for redevelopment over the next 10-plus years; no single-family homes are identified among them. At the Steering Committee's recommendation, the Plan also identifies three broader subareas, North, Downtown, and South Mount Prospect, that could benefit from more detailed, dedicated planning in the future, with boundaries subject to change. On Housing & Neighborhoods, Mr. Hogan noted that most of the Village's housing stock was built between the 1950s and 1980s, so the Plan's approach is maintenance -focused, supporting multifamily housing through code enforcement, capital improvements, and partnerships with regional agencies. The Plan supports making downtown's mixed -use housing stock more walkable, adding density in appropriate locations, and identifying suitable infill sites. He noted that corridor commercial areas are addressed in the housing chapter because the Village has seen increasing proposals for residential units in automobile -oriented commercial areas, citing the new Dunkin' Donuts mixed -use building on South Elmhurst Road as an example, and that staff expects more such proposals given current housing demand. The Plan also recommends evaluating the potential annexation of two unincorporated pockets on a case -by -case basis, noting this would be a longer -term conversation. On Commercial & Industrial Areas, Mr. Hogan described a policy of continuing to advance Downtown Mount Prospect, building on recent mixed -use and residential growth through sustained investment, ground -floor retail and restaurants, public realm improvements, updated infrastructure, and infill development. In South Mount Prospect's commercial areas, the Plan calls for supporting existing businesses and improving site conditions in the near term while supporting selective mixed -use. Along Rand Road and at Randhurst Village, the Plan supports continued stabilization and working with ownership to add dining and entertainment uses. In the neighborhood commercial centers of Central and North Mount Prospect, the Plan supports continued small-scale improvement. For industrial areas, the Plan focuses on retaining existing employers while attracting higher -wage users, including transitioning the Kensington Business Center toward a mixed -use business area. On Transportation & Mobility, Mr. Hogan noted the Plan's first goal is adopting updated corridor design guidelines. It also calls for expanding the bike network based on the completed Arterial Bike Network Study, which identified 18 corridors for paths and on - street facilities, and supports filling sidewalk gaps generally to improve walkability Village - wide; he noted that any specific sidewalk proposal would still go through the typical review process, which could conclude that a given area isn't suited for one. He described Metra station access and amenities as the Village's most valuable transit asset, with the Plan calling for improved bike parking, lighting, wayfinding, and pedestrian connections, along with continued coordination with Metra on off-peak and weekend scheduling. Page 9 of 455 Chairman Donnelly asked whether there are plans to connect the bike trailnetwork's north and south sections, noting the map does not appear to show a connection between the two. Mr. Hogan responded that this idea had been raised with Public Works, which indicated the arterial bike network approach works best for these areas; he noted that most people traveling north -south use neighborhood streets, where low traffic volumes make a dedicated connector path unnecessary. Mr. Hogan added that, in discussions with transit agencies, Pace indicated interest in introducing a Pulse corridor along Golf Road connecting Mount Prospect to other municipalities in the corridor, with bus frequencies of 15 to 30 minutes. He stated the Plan generally supports this if Pace invests in stronger bus stops, and noted that the Rand/Kensington/Elmhurst intersection already has an approved grant, with the Plan expressing support for those improvements, including first-mile/last-mile microtransit. On Community Facilities, Mr. Hogan described it as the chapter most directly controlled by the Village and other taxing bodies, covering Public Works facilities, Park District - maintained parks, schools, and other public facilities. He noted that supporting the maintenance of these facilities is basic objective of any comprehensive plan, and that while the Village already works toward these goals, the Plan reinforces that direction. In response to a question from the Commission, Director Shallcross explained that Lincoln and Lions Park are called out with a blue -square designation in the Plan because both recently had referendum projects approved, and the Plan is recognizing support for those reinvestment efforts. Mr. Hogan highlighted the planned Village Resource Center on the south end of the Village as key element of this chapter, describing it as an expansion of the Community Connections Center concept. The Village has purchased a building on Algonquin Road that it intends to convert into a larger community center for South Mount Prospect, building on the current facility's role in providing residents access to Mount Prospect Public Library resources and community space. In response to a further question from the Commission, Mr. Hogan noted that the planning process surfaced significant interest in creating more space for teens and children, describing a gap in "third spaces" for that age group; for families on the south end of the Village, the new center would offer place for homework, recreation, and socializing. Commissioner Costa asked whether outdoor space is planned in connection with the new resource center. Mr. Hogan replied that outdoor space would likely be added as the project design progresses. Commissioner Costa thanked Mr. Hogan. On Parks & Environment, Mr. Hogan noted that because the Park District already serves most residents and staff shared the Plan with Park District leadership, who were supportive the Plan focuses on improving and maintaining the existing system. He highlighted proposed creek improvements along Weller, McDonald, and Higgins Creek intended to build a more interconnected park system rather than treating these corridors Page 10 of 455 solely as drainage and referenced the Lions Memorial Park improvements discussed earlier. He noted that a small number of areas are currently less served by parks than others, and that the Plan identifies opportunities to add community open space in those areas over time. In response to a question about walking distance to parks, Mr. Hogan noted that while most residents are within a 5-to-1 0-minute walk of a park, some areas are farther, and that increasing facilities and coverage over time is a long-term goal of the Plan. On Implementation, Mr. Hogan explained that the Plan includes 153 implementation actions, detailed in an implementation matrix at the back of the document and organized into short-term (1-4 years), long-term (5+ years), and ongoing priorities. He noted that Community Development staff would likely lead most of this work, potentially partnering with the Village Board and Planning & Zoning Commission throughout implementation. Mr. Hogan opened the floor to questions and comments, noting that staff hopes to present the Plan to the Village Board in September. uestions for Staff Chairman Donnelly asked for questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Weir commented that she appreciated that there are commercial nodes identified in north Mount Prospect, citing the intersection of Kensington and Wolf Road as an example, and asked how zoning changes could or would occur to implement them. Mr. Hogan stated that the zoning is largely in place and that any changes would require a public process. Commissioner Weir asked about the potential to add more street design guidelines. Mr. Hogan confirmed that the Transportation chapter calls for updated street design guidelines. Commissioner Weir asked about the potential for increasing density near the Prospect Heights Metra station. Mr. Hogan stated that adding density near transit is a general goal of the Plan, but that the Metra station itself is entirely within Prospect Heights. He noted that the areas around the station are mostly single-family, though the Future Land Use Map offers flexibility in that area. Commissioner Weir asked how the code might be changed in that area to accommodate increased density. Director Shallcross stated that MP2040 is a high-level policy document and not more specific document that would alter the zoning code in particular ways. Commissioner Weir asked if there is specific growth goal for the community. Director Shallcross stated that there is no population target, as the Village is largely built out. Chairman Donnelly noted that the Plan states there is no room to grow outward, and that growth can only occur "upward," and that the Plan identifies some areas, such as along commercial corridors, where that would make sense. Page 11 of 455 Commissioner Beattie asked if there were opportunities to add density without disrupting single-family neighborhoods, noting that some residents have pushed back on that idea at past meetings. Director Shallcross noted that there are still options, notably111 Busse in Downtown Mount Prospect, and cited 301 LaSalle, a recently approved corridor -style mixed -use building, as an example of how future development could occur. Commissioner Fricano asked about the potential to add green space in more specific Locations, noting that many residents raise this. Director Shallcross stated that the park districts generally own and manage the parks in Mount Prospect, so the Plan simply identifies areas that could potentially make sense for parks; the circumstances would have to be unique to add a new park in many of these areas, but it is nevertheless worth noting where that could occur. The Commissioners generally discussed parks and opportunities to add them. Questions from Attendees One attendee asked a question unrelated to the agenda item. Chairman Donnelly stated that the Village Board would be the appropriate venue for the question. Motion, Second and Discussion Hearing no further questions, Chairman Donnelly called for a motion to approve the MP2040 Comprehensive Plan per Staff's recommendation. Commissioner Costa made the motion and Commissioner Szymczak seconded the motion. Chairman Donnelly asked if there was any additional conversation about the Plan among the Commissioners. Commissioner Costa made several comments. She stated that she appreciated the phrasing of the flood hazard section. She stated that she supported the public art elements of the Plan and noted that she would support the creation of mural program. She stated that she was interested in hearing more about the sustainable design standards and was interested in codifying more sustainable programs in the future. She stated that she liked the Plan's support for additional parks in South Mount Prospect. Chairman Donnelly noted that he believed the Plan was an overall great document. Roll Call Hearing no further discussion, Chairman Donnelly took a roll call. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Weir, Beattie, Fricano, Costa, Donnelly NAYS: None The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend approval of the MP2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Village Board. Page 12 of 455 After hearing no additional items of new business, Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens to be heard. Hearing no further discussion, Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Szymczak, and the meeting was adjourned at 8:27 PM. Catherine Cook, Community Development Planning Intern Page 13 of 455 Subject Meeting Fiscal Impact (Y/N) Dollar Amount Budget Source Category Type Information Discussion Alternatives Item Cover Page PZ-24-26 / 300 S Elmhurst Avenue / Signage Variations - TO BE CONTINUED TO THE OCTOBER 8, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. September 24, 2026 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NEW BUSINESS Action Item Staff Recommendation Attachments None Page 14 of 455 MORA r Item Cover Page Subject PZ-16-26 / Mount Prospect Plaza (990-1145 Mt. Prospect Plaza, 940-950 E. Rand Road, 1200-1220 E. Central Road, 802 E Rand Road) / Preliminary & Final PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat - TO BE CONTINUED TO THE OCTOBER 8, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. Meeting Fiscal Impact (Y/N) Dollar Amount Budget Source Category Type Information Discussion Alternatives September 24, 2026 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION N NEW BUSINESS Action Item Staff Recommendation Attachments None Page 15 of 455 MORA r Item Cover Page Subject PZ-21-26 / 1714 Larch Drive / CU: Setback Reduction for Accessory Structure (Deck) / PZ Final Meeting September 24, 2026 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Fiscal Impact (Y/N) N Dollar Amount N/A Budget Source N/A Category NEW BUSINESS Type Action Item Information The Petitioner, Mike Klein of Kayak Pools Midwest, on behalf of the property owner, Antonio Marzovilla, is seeking conditional use approval to construct a deck that requires a reduction from the required fifteen -foot (15"-0"") rear yard setback at 1714 Larch Drive (the Subject Property) to a ten -foot (10') rear yard setback, if approved. Staff finds that the proposal meets the applicable conditional use standards related to the Village Code, and Staff is therefore supportive of the request. The Subject Property was annexed into the Village in 1971 and is located on the west side of Larch Drive, between Roberts Lane and Maya Lane. The property is zoned R-1 Single Family Residence and comprises approximately 14,641 square feet. The property is improved with a single-family home. Discussion SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner proposes to reduce the rear yard setback for decks from the minimum setback requirement of fifteen feet (15"-0"") to ten feet (10"-0"), which would allow for the construction of a six foot (6") wide, by twenty foot (20') long, by four -foot (4") tall deck attached to an above -ground swimming pool. The five-foot (5'-0"") rear yard setback reduction represents a thirty-three percent (33%) reduction in the required rear yard setback for decks, patios and balconies. Page 16 of 455 The Petitioner stated to staff that they are requesting the setback reduction because an underground utility line running through the rear yard limits the area of the lot usable for pool construction, making it difficult to fit the Petitioner's preferred pool and deck configuration within the confines of the required setbacks. The requested reduction allows the pool and deck to be sited away from the underground line while still achieving the Petitioner's intended layout. The reduced setback for the deck will not cause the Subject Property to exceed the maximum 45% lot coverage requirement. The tables below outline the bulk regulations for the decks, patios and balconies in the R-1 Single Family Residential district: Table 1: Bulk Regulations for Patios, Decks and Balconies at 1714 Larch Drive Minimum Setbacks Code Requirement Proposed 30 feet No relief requested Front (W) 6.6 feet (10% of lot width) No relief requested Interior Side (N) 10 feet N/A Exterior Side 15 feet 10 feet Rear (E) (5-foot reduction) Maximum Total Property 45.0% 30.6% (increase from 28%) Lot Coverage No conditions of approval were recommended by Planning, Building, Fire, or Public Works Staff. Public Works noted that because the proposed deck would not encroach into any easements and will be elevated, it will not impact drainage in the area. LONG-RANGE PLANNING The Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map designates the Subject Property as Single Family Residential, which includes detached single-family homes and associated improvements. The proposed deck is compatible with the residential character of this designation and represents a reasonable improvement to an existing single-family residence. Accordingly, the Petitioner's proposal is consistent with the long-range goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The conditional use request also supports Goal 3 of the Village of Mount Prospect's 2024- 2029-2039 Strategic Plan, which includes evaluating current zoning regulations to promote single-family residential neighborhoods. The proposed deck advances this goal by supporting reasonable reinvestment in an existing single-family property while maintaining compatibility Page 17 of 455 with surrounding residential properties. PUBLIC COMMENT As of this writing, staff has received one public comment expressing opposition to the proposal and no comments of support. Alternatives A. Approval of the following motion: "A conditional use to allow a reduction in the required rear yard setback from fifteen feet (15"-0"") to ten feet (10"-0"") for the construction of a deck attached to an above ground pool at 1714 Larch Drive, subject to the following conditions: i. The improvements shall be in general conformance with the approved development plans, which consist of the following (collectively the "Approved Plans"): ■ "Site Plan", consisting of one (1) sheet, illustrated by Kayak Pools on a plat of survey prepared by Morris Engineering, attached as Exhibit B in the staff report; ■ "16x24 L Deck", consisting of thirteen (13) sheets, prepared by Kayak Pools, and bearing the latest revision date of 06/27/2024. B. Action at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff Recommendation Approval of a conditional use to allow a reduction in the required rear yard setback from fifteen feet (15"-0") to ten feet (10"-0"") for the construction of a deck attached at 1714 Larch Drive, subject to the conditions in the staff report. Attachments 1. PZ-21-26 Staff Report 2. PZ-21-26 Admin Content Redacted 3. PZ-21-26 Plans Page 18 of 455 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development Jason Shallcross, AICP, CEcD Charlie Hogan Director of Community Development Senior Planner DATE: September 17, 2026 CASE NUMBER PZ-21-26 PUBLIC HEARING DATE September 24, 2026 APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER Mike Klein, Kayak Pools Midwest / Antonio Marzovilla PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 1714 Larch Drive BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST The Petitioner, Mike Klein of Kayak Pools Midwest, on behalf of the property owner, Antonio Marzovilla, is seeking conditional use approval to construct a deck that requires a reduction from the required fifteen -foot (15'-0") rear yard setback at 1714 Larch Drive (the Subject Property) to a ten -foot (10') rear yard setback, if approved. Staff finds that the proposal meets the applicable conditional use standards related to the Village Code, and Staff is therefore supportive of the request. 2026 Aerial Image 2026 Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Map 1,11M Prospect Subject Property Heights 715 N 11 i l � 1711 N i 171 U co L —.1 1710 I co R-1 70!5 0 ra ME EXISTING EXISTING LAND USE/SITE SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE SIZE OF ZONING IMPROVEMENTS North: R-1 Single Family Residential PROPERTY R-1 Single Single Family Residential East: R-1 Single Family Residential 0.33 Acres Family South: R-1 Single Family Residential Residential West: Single Family Residential (Prospect Heights) STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVE APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS DENY 1 Page 19 of 455 BACKGROUND The Subject Property was annexed into the Village in 1971 and is located on the west side of Larch Drive, between Roberts Lane and Maya Lane. The property is zoned R-1 Single Family Residence and comprises approximately 14,641 square feet. The property is improved with a single-family home. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner proposes to reduce the rear yard setback for decks from the minimum setback requirement of fifteen feet (15'-0") to ten feet (10'-0"), which would allow for the construction of a six foot (6') wide, by twenty foot (20') long, by four -foot (4') tall deck attached to an above -ground swimming pool. The five-foot (5'-0") rear yard setback reduction represents a thirty-three percent (33%) reduction in the required rear yard setback for decks, patios and balconies. The Petitioner stated to staff that they are requesting the setback reduction because an underground utility line running through the rear yard limits the area of the lot usable for pool construction, making it difficult to fit the Petitioner's preferred pool and deck configuration within the confines of the required setbacks. The requested reduction allows the pool and deck to be sited away from the underground Line while still achieving the Petitioner's intended layout. The reduced setback for the deck will not cause the Subject Property to exceed the maximum 45% lot coverage requirement. The tables below outline the bulk regulations for the decks, patios and balconies in the R-1 Single Family Residential district: Table 1: Bulk Regulations for Patios, Decks and Balconies at 1714 Larch Drive Minimum Setbacks Code Requirement Proposed Front (W) 30 feet No relief requested Interior Side (N) 6.6 feet (10% of lot width) No relief requested Exterior Side 10 feet N/A Rear (E) 15 feet 10 feet (5-foot reduction) Maximum Total Property Lot Coverage 45.0% 30.6% (increase from 28%) No conditions of approval were recommended by Planning, Building, Fire, or Public Works Staff. Public Works noted that because the proposed deck would not encroach into any easements and will be elevated, it will not impact drainage in the area. 2 Page 20 of 455 LONG-RANGE PLANNING The Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map designates the Subject Property as Single Family Residential, which includes detached single-family homes and associated improvements. The proposed deck is compatible with the residential character of this designation and represents reasonable improvement to an existing single-family residence. Accordingly, the Petitioner's proposal is consistent with the long-range goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The conditional use request also supports Goal 3 of the Village of Mount Prospect's 2024-2029-2039 Strategic Plan, which includes evaluating current zoning regulations to promote single-family residential neighborhoods. The proposed deck advances this goal by supporting reasonable reinvestment in an existing single-family property while maintaining compatibility with surrounding residential properties. PUBLIC COMMENT As of this writing, staff has received one public comment expressing opposition to the proposal and no comments of support. STANDARDS AND FINDINGS The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the standards and findings of fact outlined in Exhibit A and 1) accept them without changes, 2) accept them with changes, or 3) reject the findings. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall use the findings of fact to guide their recommendation to the Village Board. 3 Page 21 of 455 Staff finds that the proposed conditional use request meets the applicable standards contained in the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. Staff requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt Staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approve the following motion: "To approve: 1. A conditional use to allow a reduction in the required rear yard setback from fifteen feet (15'-0") to ten feet (10'-0") for the construction of a deck attached to an aboveground pool at 1714 Larch Drive, subject to the following conditions: a. The improvements shall be in general conformance with the approved development plans, which consist of the following (collectively the "Approved Plans"): i. "Site Plan", consisting of one (1) sheet, illustrated by Kayak Pools on a plat of survey prepared by Morris Engineering, attached as Exhibit B; ii. "16x24 L Deck", consisting of thirteen (13) sheets, prepared by Kayak Pools, and bearing the latest revision date of 06/27/2024. The Planning and Zoning Commission's decision is final for this case. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENT PLANS OTHER ATTACHMENTS: (Zoning Request Application, Responses to ((PZLatofurvey, Site Plan, etc.) (Supplemental Information, Public Standards, etc...) Comments Received, etc...) 1 concur: Jason Shallcross, AICP, CEcD Director of Community Development N Page 22 of 455 Exhibit A Standards and Findings of Fact CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance provides that a Conditional Use shall conform to the following requirements: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located; 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; 5. That adequate measures have been or will betaken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current comprehensive plan for the village; and 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the planning and zoning commission. Petitioner's Findings: The Petitioner states that the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the public health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding area. The Petitioner notes that the deck's limited encroachment into the required rear setback is necessary to accommodate the existing layout of the residence and yard, and that the improvement will enhance the functionality and value of the property without negatively impacting surrounding properties or their ability to develop in accordance with applicable zoning regulations. The Petitioner further states that no additional traffic congestion is anticipated, as the deck will not alter existing access to the property, and that the proposal is consistent with the intent of the Village's Comprehensive Plan and will comply with all other applicable Village codes and regulations, except for the requested conditional use to allow the deck to encroach into the required rear yard setback. Staff's Findings: Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for conditional use approval toallow a reduction in the rear yard setback and finds that the applicable standards have been met. There is no indication that the proposed request would endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare or result in physical changes that would adversely impact surrounding property values, public utilities, drainage, or traffic circulation on public streets. Given that the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, staff recommends approval of the requested conditional use. 5 Page 23 of 455 Exhibit B Site Plan Page 24 of 455 9/18/26, 9:33 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve ddmkb Lu PERMIT PROJECT FILE #: 26-004799 1714 LARCH DR MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 PZ-21-26: 1714 LARCH DRIVE (CU: SETBACK REDUCTION FOR A DECK) PERMIT #: PZZ26-000018 Permit Type Zoning Request Application (Subtype Zoning Request Work Description: Aluminum based vinyl lined swimming pool installed pool will be above ground. Swim area will be 16x244ftflat bottom and have an aluminum L deck totaling 680 sq ft. (Applicant • • • Kayak Pools Midwest - Mike Klein ••• Status Online Application Received Valuation 0.00 FEES &PAYMENTS Plan Check Fees 250.00 Permit Fees 0.00 Total Amount 250.00 Amount Paid 250.00 Balance Due 0.00 F-1 Non -Billable PERMIT DATES (Application Date 07/22/2026 Approval Date Issue Date: https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit ID=53528154&WorkOrder-096W �5 Of M5 9/18/26, 9:33 AM Expiration Date: Permit Details I Citizenserve Close Date Last Inspection NOTE STOP! Have you had a Preliminary Meeting the the Planning Department? If Yes, continue, else, please call 847-818-5328 to schedule. Isummary of Proposal Aluminum based vinyl lined swimming pool installed pool will be above ground. Swim area will be 16x24 4ft flat bottom and have an aluminum L deck totaling 680 sq ft. CLICK HERE for Conditional Uses, Variations, Zoning Map and Text Amendments Submission Requirements (Proof of Ownership v Please upload the Property Owner's Signature by downloading this attachment HERE Il iir( piiiil : i iieiir� 13iii g iiin a tU lire. IIpd f � v For Owner Affidavit CLICK HERE (Affidavit of Ownership (Notarized) .... ffidavi t of riu ;riir r III°i iii IIm mombn v (Paid Receipt of the most recent tax bill Ili=mom ��r iii .....ax IIV; iii III III . P(] fN' v (Responses to applicable standards oiiri(J iii [iii o i III LJse III.....e.t.t &r. III d1 f v (Plans III II � iir, iii III III ,� .:�� .�...... II... � .... ... Ili iii°, i iin .... I J t iii III lift iii ire. 11 f v (Legal Description Ill.....e i III Illl: s iii° iii Ili: tiii � iiii i m ill c)c i v Document indicating intent to buy or lease v Legal Notice https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit ID=53528154&WorkOrder-09%1N of 4� 9,/ 1 8J26.V 91.33 AM Permilt. Details, I Citizenserve V V Buf fer Map Other ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION Ordinance or Resolution ZONING REQUEST(S) (Check all that apply) 2 Con ditlonal Use lNumber of'Conditional Uses 1 For Setback. Reduction 'TY,pe of Conditional Use Individual lot single family request F]Va r i at'i on (s) F-1zoning Map Amendment F—],Zoning Text Amendment F—]Other I n hereby affirm that all information provided herein and [ all materials submitted in association with, this application are true and accurate to the best of my kn owledg e. Sig nature Mike Klein '1191-111�sl FEE DESC V QUAWITY AMOUNT TOTAL Conditional Use Individual Lot 250.00 Single, Family Request Fee, Pla, n Check Fees 250.00, PerrnitFees 0-011101 Tote ] Fees 250.00, httpsJ/Www7 - ciffizenserve., comiAd mil n/Permitcontrol 1er?Acb1on*D isplayPerm Meta 11&Se1ectedTab=PermJfts&, Perm -it I D--53528 1 54 &,WorkOrderolw, " �7- of 5 9/18/26, 9:33 AM Permit Details I Citizenserve DATE TYPE REFERENCE NOTE RECEIPT RECEIVED AMOUNT # FROM 07/29/2026 Credi 817197126 PZZ2 62495 Kayak Po( 250.00 Amount Paid 250.00 Balance Due 0.00 https://www7.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit ID=53528154&WorkOrder-096WN of 4d5 Affidavit ofOwnership COUNTYOF COOK 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS Maria. Mairzovilla (primt name) F-1 the sole ow, inerof the pro peirty Fx-1 ain owner of flee property F-1 airy auith o riiizeoffice, r fo r th e own eir ofth e iro pe in under oath state that I aim comrnonly desciribed� as 1714 ill Lairch Dir,,, itt Prospect,, TL 6,0056 03-24-305-015-000 (,property addiress, and PIN) andthat such property iiiiisowned by ime this, 22nd any of July �)i 20.26 . Marilia Mairzovilla (prirnt naime) Sigina�tu re, as, ofthiis date. 93 Page 29 of 455 Propleirty Owner" C he c k i f S a m, e slA p p L i c a nt ■ Name: Marla Marzoviili[a Corporation: 1714 N Larch Dr A dressp City, Stllajte, ZI P o e M t P �ro, s, p el ct, 11 L 6 0 05 6 C d P h o, ��n e Emlailt:,� AL IF o Ip to I hereby affil rm that all information provided herein a nd in att materiats subi,mitted in associa 1 io w ith this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I ME= (P ri at o, rl T' pe N a me) lip 11��l I Datei'.'! 7/22,12,026 I oil act as, my agent ��forl the purpoise of seeking the zoning request(s) hereby designate the apptican t t' d 'icattionand asiciaoi the soted supprting a mterial., escribed in this, appt koibLI Awt)NA-UA 7/2,2/2,02,6 Property Owner,., Datelo, 'SiIli atuire) M (P ri at o, rl T' pe N a me) Page 30 of 455 UN,OFFI,CIA,L COPY D oc#. 1822 7 49 016 3 Feg e $ 5 0. 00 Ka re n A-Yarb r o u gh PREPARED HVIR" Co* Courty Recorder of Dmveds Dale,,Wl 512018 1 VII AM Pg: I of 2 j0$c,p,h A. La Zaafa- 1246 W4 Toully D ec I D,',20,1 80 8 D 16 4 9701 Chic gago, I L 606,31", S"N C 0 U a ftV 1 - 44 7- 4 23— 77 6, sr Tb x 3 3 65 0 0 CO . . ..... rax $18,2-50 A[ L TAX'B ILL TO,** VZO,vil",l'a 1714 N - L a, rd br, N,moun, 1w IM . . . . ....... tt T ormjwNT V11 R 46270 Y Ko c h a k C bm" st", n(a Kochatuk mtorn,ey"s Title Fund,, ItIc. kip A 031 1822749,063 Page- 2 of 2 . . . .............. STATE OF J 4 jAlYll COUNTTOF G, "i'vcri,under my W-, 41 atid, nota,IW t WW o N y iotar Ru, my,co, N eiussion illaph ma",Ner, rov h 1.0 i0 ,,,rggr SEAL JOS EPH, LA ZAPA N OTA R Y P MUC -LSTATE (rr ILLNg' MY CO,'.1,214SON: EVIRE 3 1ppllllllllq�� lilliqpillill jlr� .1V TO""'f' LTAXING DISTRICT �DEBT ATTRIBUTED TO YOUR PROPERTY FIRM 1111 1 irrlil� 111111 11 OR llp!Fllll!llp;q See Detaills Here 0 V E IR V I E W 1- PAY 1111,11"'twor" IE IN'T S o p r ty I i Nurnbeid`PllN)l- 031-241-3051-W 51-0000 Property, Location: 1714 N RCH DR MOUNT PROSPEIC-L IL 60056-000 Vblumllel*,2,33 1 Incor"rect Image .1 Cl lck Here. iA NEW . MW 1� BERIUMM Mailling information: ANTONIO MARZOVILLA 1714 N LARGH DR MT PROSPECT, IL 600556-1647 Update Your lrvflolrmatjoti� il Tax Year 2023 (billed 1 , �n 2 2, IIillilledil: $8,212.44 -r'A IL IL sir Ellf%J T - ­ra x Y ea ir 2 0 2 3 2nd P'NSTALLIMEN'T - Tax Year, 2023 Original Billed Amount: $4o755,16 Original BillAmount: $3,457,28 Due Date: 3 02 IIDate: 08/01/2024 Tax: $0.00 Tax: $0.00 Interest: 1$0.0iO Interest: $0.00 Current Amount Due., $0.00 Current Amount Duaip. $10.00 Totall Amount Due.: $0,"'001 Totdl Amount Billilled: $8,46143 Page 33 of 455 A IL IL M IE IN.... . . . . . 6,�,] X 'r Z W/ 1"il"11111 2 rd I S FA L L IM E IN "T" �- Ta x Y e r 21",') 2 4 Ofl-ginal Billed Amount,.,, $4,981.04 Original Billed Amount: $3,482.39 Due Date*., 03/04/2,025 Due Date: 1211 4 Tax. $0.00 Tar $0.00 Interest: $0.00 Interest.p. $0.00 Current Amount Due: $10.00 Current Amount Due: 1 Totall Amount Due: $0.100 Tax Year 2025 (bollied in 2026) Totdl Amount B11111ed: $4m654.87 11 r 1111�M-T- ", % 11 Original Billed Amount., $4,,654 87 Due Date: 04/01 [20 2116 Tax: $Uo Interest: $Uo Current Amount Due: $0.00 Tdtalll Amount Due: $011-10101 About, payments,.* Payments, are recorded the date they are, received. They appear on the website out three business days later. #Jpen a PIDF ollf your tax bill thalt can ��be printed and used "'to pay, in person or bly, mail. Tax Year 21023S,ecand Installment Due Thursday 0 , . August 1 202�4 Tax 'Year ZU 24, Second I nstallment Oue Moniday, December I Sj 2025 Tax'Year 21025 First Installment Due Wednesday ApriIl 1, 2026 Stop recei'ving your tax Ilbill by maill. 49P Sign up for 6ffilfinig to recelve future tax bills via, erniall. Are There Any Overplaymentson YOur PIN? U Gur records do not indleate a refundaval1l,ablie on'the PIIIN,you have entered. Page 34 of 455 Conditional Use - No conditional use shall be recommended for approval by the planning and zoning commission unless it finds: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; The proposed above -ground pool encroachment into the required rear setback will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The pool will be installed and maintained in compliance with all applicable building and safety codes, including required fencing, access restrictions, and electrical safety standards. The limited encroachment does not create hazardous conditions, obstruct emergency access, or interfere with neighboring properties. The pool is intended solely for private residential use and will not generate traffic, noise, or other impacts beyond those typically associated with a single- family residence. As proposed, the encroachment is minimal in nature and is not expected to adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the public. 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located; The proposed above -ground pool encroachment into the required rear setback will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties or substantially diminish or impair property values within the surrounding neighborhood. The pool is an accessory residential use that is commonly found in single-family neighborhoods and is compatible with the existing character of the area. The limited encroachment into the rear setback will not interfere with neighboring properties' use of their land, access to light and air, or privacy beyond what is typical for residential development. The pool will be properly maintained and comply with all applicable safety and building regulations. As a result, the proposed conditional use is not expected to create adverse impacts on adjacent properties or negatively affect neighborhood property values. Page 35 of 455 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; The proposed above -ground pool encroachment into the required rear setback will not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of surrounding properties for uses permitted within the zoning district. The pool is an accessory use customarily associated with a single-family residence and is consistent with the residential character of the neighborhood. The limited encroachment is confined to the subject property and does not restrict the ability of adjacent property owners to develop, improve, or use their properties in accordance with applicable zoning regulations. The proposal will not interfere with existing or future infrastructure, access, or other permitted residential improvements. Therefore, the requested conditional use is compatible with the continued orderly development of the surrounding area. 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; Adequate public utilities, access, drainage, and necessary facilities are available to serve the proposed conditional use. The above -ground pool is an accessory residential improvement that does not create a demand for additional public infrastructure or services beyond those already serving the existing residence. The proposed encroachment into the rear setback will not affect existing utility easements, public access, or drainage patterns. Any required electrical connections and associated improvements will be installed in accordance with applicable building, electrical, and safety codes. Therefore, the proposal will not adversely impact public utilities, access roads, drainage, or other necessary public facilities. Page 36 of 455 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; The proposed conditional use will not adversely affect ingress and egress or contribute to traffic congestion on public streets. The above -ground pool is an accessory use to an existing single-family residence and will not generate additional traffic beyond that normally associated with residential use. Existing driveway access to the property will remain unchanged, and no modifications to public streets or access points are required. The proposed encroachment into the rear setback is confined to the rear yard and does not impact vehicular or pedestrian access to or from the property. Therefore, adequate measures for safe ingress and egress are in place, and the proposal will not create or contribute to traffic congestion. 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village; and The proposed conditional use is consistent with the objectives of the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The above -ground pool is an accessory residential use that supports the continued use and enjoyment of the existing single-family residence without altering the established residential character of the neighborhood. Although the pool encroaches into the required rear setback, the encroachment is limited in scope and does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan's goals of promoting compatible residential development, protecting neighborhood character, and ensuring the orderly use of land. The proposal does not increase residential density, require additional public infrastructure, or create adverse impacts on surrounding properties. Therefore, the requested conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the Village's Comprehensive Plan. Page 37 of 455 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Except for the requested conditional use approval to allow the above -ground pool to encroach into the required rear setback, the proposed development conforms to the applicable regulations of the zoning district. The pool is a permitted accessory residential use and will comply with all applicable zoning, building, electrical, and safety requirements, including any required permits and inspections. No additional deviations from the zoning regulations are requested. Subject to any conditions recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission, the proposed conditional use will conform to all other applicable district regulations. Page 38 of 455 Legal Description: LOT 335 IN BRICKMAN MANOR THIRD ADDITION UNIT NO. 3, BEINING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OKAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, I LLI NOIS ON FEBRUARY 19, 1965 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2196194. Page 40 of 455 �9'_ 4"� TYP. 4'BETWEEN POSTS ON SIDE 1' 4' 20'y 24'OR 32' OF WATER WALLS wx�l RaWN f,;Ww 10 TYPICAL SOE ELEVA TION fi rat lium My, lkleflia:.e. deiligfia!&A futerw. 6merrs-l'sm etc Mick f&OW Vef' La 13 a %4r. f lix'w � e-IeA hl . duo E f Am ir--4 tSao! rail &Vg'S Shts- I Deck rents, K-A YAK PO LS ELEVATIONDAAG. uvw--fl slapi �40DEL PLAN Page 43 of 455 Subject Meeting Fiscal Impact (Y/N) Dollar Amount Budget Source Category Type Information Item Cover Page PZ-11-26 / 409 Hi Lusi Avenue / CU: Setback Reduction for Attached Garage / VB Final September 24, 2026 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION N NEW BUSINESS Action Item The Petitioner, Kevin Purdom of ]RC Design Build, on behalf of the property owner, Kimberly Pagliari, is seeking conditional use approval to construct a one-story attached garage addition that requires a reduction to the five-foot (5"-0"") interior side yard setback at 409 Hi Lusi Avenue (the Subject Property). The proposed garage addition will have a three-foot (3'-0") setback from the property line. The proposal meets the requirements and standards related to the Village Code, and Staff is supportive of the conditional use request. Discussion BACKGROUND The existing attached one -car garage measures approximately 11'-6" by 20'-0". The proposed addition would extend the garage to accommodate two vehicles parked in tandem. An existing nonconforming shed located approximately one foot from the north property line would be removed as part of the project. The proposed garage addition requires a two -foot (2'-0"), or forty percent (40%), reduction in the required interior side yard setback. The property would otherwise comply with applicable bulk regulations, including the maximum lot coverage and floor area ratio requirements. Due to existing grading conditions, stormwater from the neighboring property at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue currently flows onto the Subject Property near the garage. The applicant submitted a detailed grading plan and cross sections demonstrating that the existing drainage pattern will be maintained while providing a maintainable side yard. The Public Works Department reviewed the plans and found the proposed grading acceptable. The proposed garage expansion is consistent with the Single Family Residential designation of the Comprehensive Plan and supports the Strategic Plan objective of promoting reasonable reinvestment in existing single-family neighborhoods. PUBLIC COMMENT As of this writing, no public comments had been received. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Page 44 of 455 Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for conditional use approval to allow a reduction in the interior side yard setback and finds that the applicable standards have been met. There is no indication that the proposed request would endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare or result in physical changes that would adversely impact surrounding property values, public utilities, drainage, or traffic circulation on public streets. Conditions of approval have been added to safeguard and minimize any adverse impacts to neighboring properties. These conditions ensure that any work on the adjacent property at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue requiring a permit must be approved by the neighboring property owner and that any damage to the retaining wall located within the side yard, including portions situated on the neighboring property at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue, shall be repaired and restored to a condition equal to or better than its pre -construction condition as part of this project. Given that the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conforms to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, staff recommends approval of the requested conditional use. Alternatives A. Approval of a conditional use to allow a reduction in the required interior side yard setback from five feet (5"-0,"') to three feet (3"-0") for the construction of an attached garage addition at 409 Hi Lusi Avenue, Case No. PZ-11-26, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. B. Action at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff Recommendation Approval of a conditional use to allow a reduction in the required interior side yard setback from five feet (5"-0"") to three feet (3"-0") for the construction of an attached garage addition at 409 Hi Lusi Avenue, Case No. PZ-11-26, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Attachments 1. PZ-11-26 Staff Report 2. PZ-11-26 Administrative Content 3. PZ-11-26 Plans Page 45 of 455 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development Jason Shallcross, AICP, CEcD Ann Choi Director of Community Development Senior Development Planner DATE: September 17, 2026 CASE NUMBER PZ-11-26 PUBLIC HEARING DATE September 24, 2026 APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER Kevin Purdom, JRC Design Build / Kimberly Pagli a ri PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 409 Hi Lusi Avenue BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST The Petitioner, Kevin Purdom of JRC Design Build, on behalf of the property owner, Kimberly Pagliari, is seeking conditional use approval to construct a one-story attached garage addition that requires a reduction to the five-foot (5'-0") interior side yard setback at 409 Hi Lusi Avenue (the Subject Property). The proposed garage addition will have a three-foot (3'-0") setback from the property line. The proposal meets the requirements and standards related to the Village Code, and Staff is supportive of the conditional use request. 2026 Aerial Image 2026 Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Map Lincoln'St ..,,, ��„..., ........ .. ,, � ... �... .. Subject Property RRRoa�her.. � � 3�h 1 f r e 1 00 .e�»e. i. y oh fA I RA 4. may gnu � �M AN f ya �e CIO EXISTING EXISTING LAND USE/SITE SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE SIZE OF ZONING IMPROVEMENTS North: R-A Single Family Residential PROPERTY R-A Single Single Family Residential East: R-A Single Family Residential 0.23Acres Family South: R-A Single Family Residential Residential West: R-A Single Family Residential STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVE APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS DENY 1 Page 46 of 455 BACKGROUND The Subject Property was annexed into the Village in 1925 and is located on the east side of Hi Lusi Avenue, between Lincoln Street and Go Wando Avenue. The property is zoned R-A Single Family Residence and comprises approximately 9,812 square feet. An existing nonconforming shed, measuring approximately three feet by seven feet (3'-0" x 7'-0"), is located approximately one foot (1'- 0") from the north property line within the area of the proposed garage addition. The shed would be removed to accommodate the proposed expansion. The existing attached one -car garage measures approximately eleven feet six inches by twenty feet (11-9-6-99 x 20'-0"). The proposed expansion would increase the depth of the garage to accommodate two vehicles parked in tandem. The foundation of the neighboring residence at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue is approximately twelve inches (12") higher than the foundation of the residence on the Subject Property. Due to the existing grading conditions, stormwater runoff from 407 Hi Lusi Avenue flows onto the Subject Property in the vicinity of the existing garage. The Public Works Department has determined that this existing drainage pattern must be maintained and that the proposed improvements at 409 Hi Lusi Avenue may not obstruct or otherwise impede the existing flow of stormwater from the neighboring property. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner proposes to reduce the interior side yard setback from the minimum setback requirement of five feet (5'-0") to three feet (3'-0"), which would allow for the construction of a proposed garage addition. The two -foot (2'-0") reduction is a forty percent (40%) reduction in the required minimum interior side yard setback requirement. The Subject Property is zoned R-A Single Family Residential. The reduced setback for the garage addition in the interior side yard will not cause the Subject Property to exceed the maximum 50% lot coverage requirement. The table on the following page outlines the bulk regulations for the R-A Single Family Residential district: [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 2 Page 47 of 455 Table 1: Bulk Regulations for R-A Zoning District Minimum Setbacks R-A Code Requirement Proposed Front (W) 30 feet No change Interior Side (N) 5 feet 3 feet (2' or 40% reduction) Exterior Side 10 feet N/A Rear (E) 25 feet 75'-11" Maximum Lot Coverage 50.0% 33.6% Maximum Front Yard Coverage 50.0% Maximum Height 35 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.50 1 0.41 Conditions of approval have been recommended to minimize potential adverse impacts to the neighboring property at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue. To address the Public Works Department's requirement that the existing drainage pattern be maintained and that the proposed improvements at 409 Hi Lusi Avenue not impede stormwater flow from the neighboring property, the applicant submitted a detailed grading plan and cross sections. The plans demonstrate that the proposed grading and slopes will maintain the existing drainage pattern while providing a maintainable side yard. The grading plan and cross sections have been reviewed and found acceptable by the Public Works Department. LONG-RANGE PLANNING The Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map designates the Subject Property as Single Family Residential, which includes detached single-family homes and associated improvements. The proposed garage expansion is compatible with the residential character of this designation and represents a reasonable improvement to an existing single-family residence. Accordingly, the Petitioner's proposal is consistent with the long-range goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The conditional use request also supports Goal 3 of the Village of Mount Prospect's 2024-2029-2039 Strategic Plan, which includes evaluating current zoning regulations to promote single-family residential neighborhoods. The proposed garage expansion advances this goal by supporting reasonable reinvestment in an existing single-family property while maintaining compatibility with surrounding residential properties. PUBLIC COMMENT As of this writing, staff has not received any public comments. STANDARDS AND FINDINGS The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the standards and findings of fact outlined in Exhibit A and 1) accept them without changes, 2) accept them with changes, or 3) reject the findings. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall use the findings of fact to guide their recommendation to the Village Board. 3 Page 48 of 455 Staff finds that the proposed conditional use requests meet the applicable standards contained in the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. Staff requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission make motion to adopt Staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: "To adopt staff's findings, attached as Exhibit A, as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of: 1. A conditional use to allow a reduction in the required interior side yard setback from five feet (5'-0") to three feet (3'-0") for the construction of an attached garage addition at 409 Hi Lusi Avenue, subject to the following conditions: a. The improvements shall be in general conformance with the approved development plans which consist of the following (collectively the "Approved Plans", excerpts of which are attached as Exhibit B): i. "Site Improvement Plan", consisting of one (1) sheet, prepared by Haeger Engineering, and bearing the latest revision date of 07/31/2026; ii. "Addition to the Pagliari Residence", consisting of ten (10) sheets (Sheets AO-A8 and MEP1), prepared by JRC Design Build, and bearing the latest revision date of 08/26/2026. b. Any work on the adjacent property at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue requiring a permit must be approved by the neighboring property owner. c. Any damage to the retaining wall located within the side yard, including portions situated on the neighboring property at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue, shall be repaired and restored to a condition equal to or better than its pre -construction condition as part of this project." The Village Board's decision is final for this case. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENT PLANS OTHER ATTACHMENTS: (Zoning Request Application, Responses to (Plat of Survey, Site Plan, etc.) (Supplemental Information, Public Standards, etc...) Comments Received, etc...) I concur: Jason Shallcross, AICP, CEcD Director of Community Development El Page 49 of 455 Exhibit A Standards and Findings of Fact CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance provides that a Conditional Use shall conform to the following requirements: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located; 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; 5. That adequate measures have been or will betaken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current comprehensive plan for the village; and 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the planning and zoning commission. Petitioner's Findings: The Petitioner states that the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the public health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding area. The Petitioner notes that an existing shed located adjacent to the garage will be removed and that the expanded garage will be Located farther from the neighboring property than the existing shed. The Petitioner further states that the addition will improve the functionality and value of the property without negatively impacting surrounding properties or their ability to develop in accordance with applicable zoning regulations. The Petitioner states that the existing driveway will continue to serve the garage and will comply with applicable Village requirements, and that no additional traffic congestion is anticipated because the use of the garage will remain unchanged. The Petitioner further states that the proposal is consistent with the intent of the Village's Comprehensive Plan and will comply with all other applicable Village codes and regulations, except for the requested conditional use to allow the garage expansion to encroach into the required side yard setback. Staff's Findings: Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for conditional use approval to allow a reduction in the interior side yard setback and finds that the applicable standards have been met. There is no indication that the proposed request would endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare or result in physical changes that would adversely impact surrounding property values, 5 Page 50 of 455 public utilities, drainage, or traffic circulation on public streets. Conditions of approval have been added to safeguard and minimize any adverse impacts to neighboring properties. These conditions ensure that any work on the adjacent property at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue requiring a permit must be approved by the neighboring property owner and that any damage to the retaining wall located within the side yard, including portions situated on the neighboring property at 407 Hi Lusi Avenue, shall be repaired and restored toa condition equal to or better than its pre -construction condition as part of this project. Given that the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conforms to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, staff recommends approval of the requested conditional use. 0 Page 51 of 455 j; fEs +.aSS. # aas A_A ..# Know why's..,below. Call wweyoudig. V N O 0 0 WAMI i ""LOT 6 — e a22578 AC, I j lLAW 0 We P � F I LOSS s E`L.Lj,c L 6.Vi t SELL tELL a _ b a. SOLE E#LE ---- .- EEL# -� s E ' SUMP PUMP k HOUSE CONNECTION ALE cE _ __ __ _._- :: --: - - ------ ' ul Q ' tu caps 603 _ e-:: _,_. _ - -- ------ ------- PROPOSED i r••F CD 3 13 m o � CD Cr =j ;; CD r••F ii�/ Exhibit 6 Architectural Site Plan 60.00 Page 53 of 455 Village of Momlt Prospect CommunJ,ty Development Dep,artmen�lt 510S Emerso,nStreet Moun't Rrospect, Illinois 61,00,56 Phone: (847) 8,18-5328 .. . ........................... Zia 'i g RequelsIiI i ca. ion Official Use Onl1y (T6 be completed� by Village Staff) Case Number:� PZZ26-0000 10; PI 11 -26 Datei of Submission: 03/24/2,026 Hleiarin,g Date: Rroject Name/Aclicimss: PZ-11-26: 409, H Lusi,Av (CU: Setback ReductiOn') 9,124/2026 L, Subject IIProperty, Adire ss(es.): 409 Hi Lusi Ave Zo6iing District(s):Property Area (Sq Ft and/or Acreage): Parcel [ndex (PIN(s): 08-11 -406-005-0000 1pi iiiii�illillillill,li 1 11 F III 111 111111111 1111111 111 ll JI 71rol, Coinditional Use:: Folly Setback III eduction (Side) Variation :°: 'T " o Zoning MaIlr eind eint: Rezoine From TO Zoning Text Amendment: Slectioin(s) Other': 111. Sumlire ary of'III" roposa1l (uise separate sheet, i inecessary') Owners. are propos,iing to builda two story addon in the beckyarcl which compli4s,Wilth all codes a,nd ordinames. They also wa,int to extiended 'their curreint onle carattached ga,ryaw' ge to bea funictimal 2 car? gaage tandem... They are prqpos.in�g to bluilcl the garage wi�th a T-O" setback, to the side yard where 611-0 is required This Willallow therna largier garage cloory and more space to open "the cloors of their, largeSUIV imi6e the prage. The curren't prage does not fit the clars yaw 'they owin... IM, Applicant (al! correspondence willl be sent 'to Iffie applicant) Name: Kevin Purclom Corporation: JRC Design Bui]�d Add�res&: Gity, State, ZIP Code: Rhoine: Email: ln�lterest in Property,: V., Property Oweir Check if Sameas Applicant N[amie: Joseph L.IlPajlliia�ri, III Corpora.1tioin: Address: 409 IHliii Lusi Ave City, State,,ZIP Code: IMIou nt Prosped, ILI' 60056 Phon&: Email: Page 54 of 455 In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Applicant: [ZoningPermit:::9724:::79799 WIDTH=OPX HEIGHT=OPX] Date: (Print or Type Name) Kevin Purdom If applicant is not property owner: hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner: (Print or Type Name) Date: Page 55 of 455 "Village of Mount Prospect Pnopea ff Communi�tyDevelopment Department 50 S., Emerson Street 6 Mount Prospect, Ittinois 60056 Phone,-. (847) 818-53,28, Affidavit of Ownership . ........ . ..... .... ... . ..... .... ... ....... STATE OF ILLINOIS � LV� /f.of 7(rd, V„� under oath, state that I am (print name) the, sote owner of the property an owner of the property kao"P'In authorized'officer for the owner of the pfoplerty i WJ ----------- IIIIq 1111�� Subscribed and sworn to blefore me this day of j20 940 . ..... . .......... . . . ............... ........ . . . . . . . . . ... ....... . .. . ............. ..... . .. -- (print name) —.-as..o.e. Page 56 of 455 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone: (847) 818-5328 Property Owner E] Check if Same as Applicant Name: Kimberly Pagliari Corporation: NA Address: City, State, ZIP Code: Phone: 409 S Hi Lusi Ave Mount Prospect IL 60056 Email: In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Applicant: � Date• 04/07/2026 (Signature) Kevin Purdom (Print or Type Name) If applicant is not property owner: hereby designat the aup Licant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in th s/°6pplica io and the associated supporting material. Property Own Date-• 1/26 (Signature) Kimberly Pagliari (Print or Type Name) Page 57 of 455 PREPARED BY: David Frank Attorney at Law 111 Landwehr Rd. Northbrook, IL 6062 MAIL TAX RILL TO: Joseph L. Pagliari, III 409 S. Hi Lusi Ave. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 MAIL RECORDED DEED To: Lehn Shepherd Attorney at Law 121 E. Liberty, Suite Waconda, IL 604 Doc#. 1 2 4 1 1 7 Fee: $52.00 Caren A.Yrbrough Cook Counter Recorder of Deeds Date- 10/11/201 10.07 AM Pg- 1 of Dec ID 20100174 ST/CO Stamp 0- - 7 - T Tax $483.00 COTax $241.50 TRUSTEES DEED ` , ram+ _. � �� This Indenture, made this . day f 2018, between Laurell Ann Richey, successor Trustee under Trust Agreement dated May 8,199 and known as the Rachel M. Toeppen Declaration of Trust, under the provision of a deed or deeds in trust duly recorded and delivered to said trustee in pursuant of said trust agreement, party o the first part and To eph L. Pa llari, III and Kimberly A. Pa liari, LJ 1� C' V'� 0— t, 0 of Se_)C party ofthe second part. witnesseth, That said party of the first part, in consideration ofthe sum of Teri Dollars $1 . , and other good and valuable considerations 1n hand paid, does hereby grnts, sells,` conveys unto sai rty of the second part the following described real estate, situated in Cook County, St + p dt is o wit. SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Permanent Index umbers : o -I1- o6-00 -00 0 Property Address: 409 S. Hi LusiAve.., Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Together with the tenements and appurtenances thereunto belonging. Subject, however to general real estate taxes not due and payable at time of closing; building, building line and use or occupancy restrictions, conditions and covenants of record; zoning laws and ordinances, easements for public utilities; gi a_ Fy ti � � I, � � �..... -'t., W;. y�i_4.� '*•`�'� 1r + �+��.+: T*' +++r �+ ,F Y�J+y-F. 0 �.���i�j1` ` rttlrR l.�rj[-, f -4 i la 'ij146483,,.J .. .'�'�'1',-. r fit• :++, ••r•.,. _ +!--•ti+r+t '+� 132341 17 Page- 2 of TO HAVE and TO HOLD the same unto said party of the second part, and to the proper use, benefit, and behold forever of said party of the second part. This deed is executed pursuant to and in the exercise of the power and authority granted to and vested in said Trustee by the terms of said deed or deeds intrust delivered to said Trustee in pursuance of the trust agreement above mentioned. Dated this 2� Yt day of �t kftoN� , 2018, (05M /eavuu L�L Q Ift &. pl�, r L � I& Laurell Ann Richey, successor Trus under Trust Agreement dated May r.,.11992 and known as the Rachel M. Toeppen Declaration of Trust STATE OF SS. COUNTY OF �d�� } I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, in the State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Laurell Ann Richey, successor Trustee undo- Trust Agreement dated May 8, 1992 and known as the Rachel M. Toeppen Declaration of Trust, personally known to me t he the same person(s) whose name is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person, and acknowledged that he/she/they signed, sealed and delivered the said instrument, as his/her/their, free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes set forth therein. Given under nay hand and notarial seal, this day of 2018. Notary Pub 1c - - OFFICIAL,: SEAL DAVID FRANK Notary Public - State of Illinois My Commission Expires Ap( 23, 2019 61oz V jdv Sajidx3 UOISSIMU U1III JO MIS - OIL(Ind AMON MNVUJ 0IAVG 1V3S ivimj 1828419178 Page: 3 of CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No.: 18CNW764059NB For P P r el l (s): -11- 8-00 -0 0 LOT 16 IN BLOCK 8 IN PROSPECT PARK COUNTRY CLUB SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 AND THE SOUTH 15 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH. RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLIN IS. 2024 Second Installment Property Tax Bill - Cook County Electronic Bill $0.00 Property Index Number (PIN) Volume Code Tax Year (Payable In) Township Classification By 04/15/2026 08-11-406-005-0000 049 16016 2024 (2025) Elk Grove 2-05 IF PAYING LATE, 04/16/2026 - 05/15/2026 05/16/2026 - 06/15/2026 06/16/2026 - 07/15/2026 LATE INTEREST IS 0.75% PER PLEASE PAY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 MONTH, BY STATE LAW WHERE YOUR MONEY GOES Total 2024 Tax Bill $13,129.13 $15239.07 MORE than 2023 Taxing District 2024 Tax 2023 Tax Difference SCHOOL DISTRICT 57 $5,577.94 $4,519.13 1, 1 More ARLINGTON HTS TWNSHP H S 214 $3,337.26 $3,147.94 $189.32 More VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT $1,070.94 $1,136.86 Less MT PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT $770.37 $722.29 $48.08 More VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND $663.14 $646.33 $16.81 More HARPER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 512 $562.04 $531.74 $30.30 More METRO WATER RECLAMATION DIST OF GR CHGO $441.33 $444.19 -$2.86 Less COUNTY OF COOK $304.79 $218.85 $85.94 More COUNTY OF COOK HEALTH & HOSPITAL COMM. $100.91 $99.14 $1.77 More PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC SAFETY $100.47 $99.14 $1.33 More FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF COOK COUNTY $88.92 $96.56 -$7.64 Less TOWN ELK GROVE $69.79 $65.66 $4.13 More TOWN ELK GROVE ROAD FUND $15.30 $15.45 -$0.15 Less NORTHWEST MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT $13.63 $12.88 $0.75 More GENERAL ASSISTANCE ELK GROVE $12.30 $12.88 Less CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS $0.00 $41.20 -$41.20 Less DO NOT PAY THESE TOTALS $13,129.13 $11,890.06 $1,239.07 More The above breakdown displays how much you pay in property taxes to each taxing district and the change from last year. Please see reverse side for a detailed breakdown by Taxing District. This tax bill has been identified to be paid by a bank/mortgage company. Verify by contacting your lender. Do not double -pay this bill. 2023 Assessed Value 46,000 2024 Total Tax Before Exemptions 2024 Property Value 460,000 14,141.92 Homeowner's Exemption-1,012.79 2024 Assessment Level X 10% Senior Citizen Exemption .00 2024 Assessed Value 46,000 Senior Freeze Exemption .00 2024 State Equalizer X 3.0355 2024 Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) 2024 Total Tax After Exemptions 139, 633 13,129.13 2024 Local Tax Rate X 10.127919% First Installment 6,539.53 2024 Total Tax Before Exemptions Second Installment + 6,589.60 14,141.92 Total 2024 Tax (Payable in 2025) 13,129.13 THANK YOU FOR YOUR FIRST INSTALLMENT PAYMENT OF: $6,539.53 JOSEPH L PAGLIARI III 409 S HI -LUST AVE 409 S HI LUSI AVE MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 MT PROSPECT IL 60056-3741 Page 61 of 455 Taxing Districts 2024 Tax 2024 Rate 2024 % Pension 2023 Tax MISCELLANEOUS TAXES NORTHWEST MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT 13.63 0.01052 0.10% 12.88 METRO WATER RECLAMATION DIST OF GR CHGO 441.33 0.34044 3.36% 45.89 444.19 MT PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT 770.37 0.59427 5.87% 59.19 722.29 MISCELLANEOUS TAXES TOTAL 1,225.33 0.94524 9.33% 1,179.36 SCHOOL TAXES HARPER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 512 562.04 0.43355 4.28% 531.74 ARLINGTON HTS TWNSHP H S 214 3,337.26 2.57439 25.42% 60.16 3,147.94 SCHOOL DISTRICT 57 5,577.94 4.30286 42.49% 117.30 4,519.13 SCHOOL TAXES TOTAL 9,477.24 7.31081 72.19% 8,198.81 MUNICIPALITY/TOWNSHIP TAXES VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 663.14 0.51155 5.05% 646.33 VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT 1,070.94 0.82613 8.16% 554.72 1,136.86 TOWN ELK GROVE ROAD FUND 15.30 0.01180 0.12% 15.45 GENERAL ASSISTANCE ELK GROVE 12.30 0.00948 0.09% 12.88 TOWN ELK GROVE 69.79 0.05383 0.53% 65.66 MUNICIPALITY/TOWNSHIP TAXES TOTAL 1,831.47 1.41280 13.95% 1,877.18 COOK COUNTY TAXES FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF COOK COUNTY 88.92 0.06858 0.68% 7.46 96.56 CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS 0.00 0.00000 0.00% 41.20 PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC SAFETY 100.47 0.07750 0.77% 99.14 COUNTY OF COOK HEALTH & HOSPITAL COMM. 100.91 0.07784 0.77% 99.14 COUNTY OF COOK 304.79 0.23512 2.31 % 102.51 218.85 COOK COUNTY TAXES TOTAL 595.09 0.45905 4.53% 634.71 (Do not pay these totals) 13,129.13 10.1279 100.00% 11,890.06 Pursuant to Cook County Ordinance 07-0-68, if you are a mortgage lender, loan servicer, or agent of any entity within the meaning of 35 ILCS 200/20-12, you may not pay using a downloadable tax bill unless you pay the $5 duplicate bill fee. *** Please see 2024 Second Installment Payment Coupon next page *** Page 62 of 455 2024 Second Installment Property Tax Bill Cook County Payment Coupon Pursuant to Cook County Ordinance 07-0-68, if you are a mortgage lender, loan servicer, or agent of any entity within the meaning of 35 ILCS 200/20-12, you may not pay using a downloadable tax bill unless you pay the $5 duplicate bill fee. IMI II T3LG ® Property Index Number (PIN) Volume Cook County eBill 08-11-406-005-0000 049 $0.00 By 04/15/2026 Click to pay online Amount Paid If paying later, refer to amounts above. Click to update Mailing Name/Address SN 0020240200 RTN 500001075 AN see PIN TIC 008922 1:5ill Internal use only 00202402000081140600500000008922400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 This is an Official Downloadable Tax Bill Payment Coupon. Please process this coupon along with payment presented. COOK COUNTY TREASURER PO BOX 805436 CHICAGO IL 60680-4155 Page 63 of 455 409 S Hi Lusi Standards for Conditional Use - Setback reduction Conditional Use - No conditional use shall be recommended for approval by the planning and zoning commission unless it finds: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; Expanding.the.garage.will.not.endanger.the.public.health.safety?morals? comfort?or.general.welfare.of.the.area i. 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located; The.project.includes.removing.a.shed.already.adjacent.to.the.existing.garage. and.the.new.garage.will.be.less.close.to.the.neighboring.lot.as.the.existing.shed. is;.This.addition.will.add.to.the.prope rty.value.and.the.functionality.of.the. ga rage; . 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; Surround ing.properties.will.not.be.impeded.in.developing.as.they.are.normally. permitted.toi. 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; Correct;.The.driveway.to.the.garage.will.still.comply.with.all.codes.and. regulations;. 5. That adequate measures have been or will betaken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; No.additional.congestion.is.expected;.Same.use.of.garage.will.be.expected i. 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village; and The.proposed.conditional.use.will.comply.with.the.intent.of.the.Comprehensive. plani Page 64 of 455 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. All.other.regulations.and.codes.will.be.followed.other.than.the.requested. conditional.use.for.the.encroachment.into.the.sideyard.for.the.expanded. ga rage; . Page 65 of 455 01114111 Lis H, hl 'k y u �u h y �^° V V " � U e c� r Il t hii i v, 1, vI oI f von � �9. f . .. .. ... ... a aye �r. y 1 o,µ u � h J �^� ygmujw INS {fr w I 'N lh r r ,.'0�NIw 1I p"i 9dr . .. . . ...... p+ d� o- r' i t' � J i, s 1� c 6� : a fi N r, ru #a *y l� Da ' I ,,, W I�„ w M �N�,'. JM w r l M, r III,,. �,,, �,�, I,.Y II�IN,I: ��i��',;�;4i ,J� I , IU rr zill4lI; 40 I. I,;, i { i �an ��.;, ,+».. ' ry '" '!4''' "MN " d i m� nM'4" aG%% Ibr �a I, p t'✓i1�'"'N� „�D",t „„ I�r@"" u��s� 7'^�SI� 4 1�"� ,� I; ,� � µ� I alp � Y , ir, 4 ,,... IN .n,. vl ail w,. .n it w,kdJdy4$ ,'t d I.„4 m„ , w d w , r, - ail i N I J' r �, ���� � eii�iig,�iri �. �,w,w�Ya �,� ,��,,I �,� Y I� �,�q �,rr fl�l iJ; �� �I: r� � "Ir. IF ��''�^ J„' ,,, ,, �,� ��WV r.,� r% � „Y�k�l�� kG; �! ICE.. I, w " rwldlll'bf b"'k a,t t �, j ry" ;rv�'ir �"fpV �s; "� &Ip, �n yg SPE " �Y .al' ➢IYPY"BIr di `M oCV k Va ,P 11;F,'I; �f hk „d ,.ir ,+'Ip�11 R'JM" ➢'o" (u °I hAg`wY �,`fi Pp x 9� ti� 'i-; f( ":. i,r �'`N' 47 r� � .i pq I +w 1���' "�" i,,k i,1i,c q��, �'r y... �, w 4rdryIi A!`,m,4' il.. o, -. ,r w�'� b� � y „ �' ��,! � �; �,��5 � � �„4-!' uwr �, � '"gym � I � 'o �! ,, � 1� , i,r...r if' i"N� � PMf s� � �Jl'tof Pi i /' l"i, �Ye I; `s�aV n� �h4e I, Page 66 of 455 Legal Description 409 S Hi Lusi Ave Mount Prospect IL 60056 Lot 16 in Block 8 in Prospect Park Country Club Subdivision of the Southeast'/4 of Section 11 and the South 15 acres of the East 1/2 of the Northeast '/4 of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois Page 67 of 455 PROJECT DATA PROJECT LOCATION: 409 S HI LUS I AVE ZONING DISTRICT: R-A LOT AREA: 97812 SF PIN: 08-11-406-005-0000 MAX FAR:. 5 PROPOSED FAR:.41 47912 SF 1649 + 1660 + 724 47033 SF MAX IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (50%) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: (33.6%) 47906 SF 37301 SF MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 35'-0" 26'-5" LOCATION AREAS: (GROSS) BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR GARAGE 970 SF 17649 SF 17660 SF 724 SF TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: 37309 SF DESIGN CRITERIA SHEET INDEX AO COVER SHEET Al EXISTING DRAWINGS A2 FOUNDATION &BASEMENT A3 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A4 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A5 ROOF PLAN &STAIR DETAIL A6 ELEVATIONS A7 ELEVATIONS A8 SPECIFICATIONS A9 STRUCTURAL DETAILS MEP1 FIRST &SECOND FLOOR ME PROJECT SCOPE OF WOl • OPTION 1: DESIGN BUILD A NEW 2 C A CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL IT WILL BE ALL SIDING. • OPTION 2: DESIGN BUILD FILLING IN WITH A MUDROOM. • OPTION 3: DESIGN BUILD EXPANDEE • OPTION 4: DESIGN BUILD THE PRIMP ROOM OR 2-BEDROOMS LAUNDF TABLE R301 .2(l) CLIMAT11 GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN Cl GROUND WIND DESIGN SEISMIC SNOW DESIGN LOAD CATEGORY SPEED TOPO SPECIAL WIND- 1l� (MPH) EFFECTS WIND BORNE REGION DEBRIS ZONE I N *A 0 ey .Z11, Ae WALL LEGEND - SUB LEVEL LOCATION U.L. NO. FIRE RATING CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR (1) - - - - - - 10" CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL W/ 2 - #5 TOP, MID & BOTTOM ON 20" X 10" CONCRETE FOOTING EXTERIOR (2) - - - - - - 12" TRENCH CONC. FOUNDATION WALL W/ 2 - #5 TOP & BOTTOM MIN. 42" BELOW GRADE INTERIOR - 1 - - - - - - 2 X 4 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL EACH FACE INTERIOR-2 (PLUMBING) --- --- 2X6WD STUDS @ 16" OCW/5/8" DRYWALL EACH FACE INTERIOR - 3 (PERIMETER) - - - - - - FOUNDATION WALL W/ 2X4 STUD WALL @ 16" OC OFFSET 2" FROM FOUNDATION WALL TO ALLOW FOR R-21 CAVITY INSULATION + 5/8" DRYWALL (INT) EXISTING WALLS --- --- NEW CONSTRUCTION --- --- CONCRETE AND EXCAVATION 1. FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED, INORGANIC SOIL WITH MINIMUM BEARING CAPACITY OF 3,000 PSF. 2. ALL EXCESS SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 3. FOUNDATION CONCRETE TO ACHIEVE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 37000 PSI AT 28 DAYS: MIN. 5 1/2 BAG MIX SIDEWALKS, PATIOS &STEPS TO BE AIR- ENTRAINED WITH COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3500 PSI AT 28 DAYS, MIN 6 MIX. 4. BACK- FILL SOIL SO THAT GRADE SLOPES AWAY FROM FOUNDATION 6" WITHIN FIRST 10'-0" (MIN.) 5. EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS WILL NOT BE ALTERED ANYWHERE ON THE SITE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN AND NOT OBSTRUCT ANY TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE FROM THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. 6. ALL EXCAVATED SOIL/MATERIALS NOT TO BE USED FOR BACKFILL & TO BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM SITE. NO ON -SITE STOCKPILING OF EXCAVATED MATERIALS WILL BE ALLOWED. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL FOR FINAL GRADING. 7. GRAVEL BASE ON CONCRETE SLABS TO HAVE A BASIC COURSE CONSISTING OF CLEAN GRADE SAND, GRAVEL, CRUSHED STONE, OR CRUSHED BLAST -FURNACE SLAG PASSING A 2" SIEVE AND RETAINED ON 1.4" SIEVE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE PREPARED SUBGRADE WHEN THE SLAB IS BELOW GRADE. PEA GRAVEL IS NOT ALLOWED. 8. PLEASE TAKE CARE WHEN DIGGING FOR THE FOOTINGS. THE USE OF ROCK UNDER FOOTING CAN FACILITATE WATER ACCUMULATION UNDER THE FLOOR SLAB/BASEMENT AND CONTRIBUTE TO WALL LEGEND = FIRST + SECOND FLOORS LOCATION U.L. NO. FIRE RATING CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR (1) - - - - - -'NVVV�=� 2 X 6 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL (INT) 1/2" OSE [R-30] FOAM CAVITY INSULATION EXTERIOR (GARAGE) - - - 1 HR 2 X 6 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL (INT) 1/2" OSE INTERIOR - 1 - - - - - - 2 X 4 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL EACH FACE INTERIOR - 2 (PLUMBING) - - - - - - 2 X 6 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL EACH FACE INTERIOR - 3 (GARAGE) - - - 1 H R 2 X 6 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL (INT) 5/8" "X" i [R-30] FOAM CAVITY INSULATION EXISTING WALLS --- --- NEW CONSTRUCTION --- --- WALL LEGEND = FIRST + SECOND FLOORS LOCATION U.L. NO. FIRE RATING CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR (1) - - - - - -'NVVV�=� 2 X 6 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL (INT) 1/2" OSE [R-30] FOAM CAVITY INSULATION EXTERIOR (GARAGE) - - - 1 HR 2 X 6 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL (INT) 1/2" OSE INTERIOR - 1 - - - - - - 2 X 4 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL EACH FACE INTERIOR - 2 (PLUMBING) - - - - - - 2 X 6 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL EACH FACE INTERIOR - 3 (GARAGE) - - - 1 H R 2 X 6 WD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ 5/8" DRYWALL (INT) 5/8" "X" i [R-30] FOAM CAVITY INSULATION EXISTING WALLS --- --- NEW CONSTRUCTION --- --- ATTIC ACCESS NOTE: R402.2.4 ACCESS HATCHES AND DOORS. ACCESS DOORS FROM CONDTITIONED SPACES TO UNCONDITIONED SPACES (E.G., ATTICS AND CRAWL SPACES) SHALL BE WEATHERSTRIPP INSULATED TO A LEVEL EQUIVALENT TO THE INSULATION ON THE SURROUNDING SURFACES. ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALL EQUIPME PREVENTS DAMAGING OR COMPRESSING THE INSULATION. A WOOD FRAMED OR EQUIVALENT BAFFLE OR RETAINER IS REQUIRED TO BE PRI WHEN LOOSE FILL INSULATION IS INSTALLED. THE PURPOSE OF WHICH IS TO PREVENT LOOSE FILL INSULATION FROM SPILLING INTO THE LIV WHEN THE ATTIC ACCESS IS OPENED, AND TO PROVIDE A PERMANENT MEANS OF MAINTAINING THE INSTALLED R-VALUE OF THE LOOSE FILL INSULATION. WINDOW NOTE: FALL PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE THE WINDOW OPENING IS LESS THAN 24 INCHES ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AND GREATEF INCHES ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. SECTION: 2021 IRC R312.2. R905mlm2 ICE BARRIERS IN AREAS WHERE THERE HAS BEEN A HISTORY OF ICE FORMING ALONG THE EAVES CAUSING S BACKUP OF WATER AS DESIGNATED IN TABLE R301.2(1). AN ICE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR ASPHALT SHINGLES, METAL ROOF SHINGLES, MINERAL -SURFACED ROLL ROOFING, SLATE AND SLATE -TYPE SHINGLE, WOOD SHINGLES AND WOOD SHAKES. THE ICE BARRIER SHALL CONSIST OF NOT FEWE THAN TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT CEMENTED TOGTHER, OR A SELF -ADHERING POLYMER -MODIFIED BITUMEN SHEET SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF NORMAL UNDERLAYMENT AND EXTEND FROM THE LOWEST EDGES OF ALL ROOF SURFACES TO A POINT NOT LESS THAN 24 INCHES (610 MM) INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE OF THE BUIDLING. ON ROOF SLOPES WITH SLOPE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 8 UNITS VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL. THE ICE BARRIER SHALL ALSO BE APPLIED NOT LESS THAN 36 INCHES MEASURED ALONG THE ROOF SLOPE FROM THE EAVE EDGE OF THE BUILDING. ROOF SLOPES BETWEEN 2:12 AND 4:12 SHALL HAVE 2 LAYERS FELT UNDERLAYMENT, TYP. FOR TIGHT BARGE ROOF, NO SOFFIT VENTILATION. PROVIDE RIDGE VENT AND LOWER ROOF VENTS PER IRC 2018 SECTION 806. 1,012 SF/300 = 3.37 SF REQUIRED VENTILATION DOOR & WINDOW WOOD HEADER SIZES (U.N.P. SPAN/OPENING HEADER SIZE # JACKS LESS THAN 3'-0" 2 - 2X6 1 3'-0" - 3'-8" 2 - 2X8 1 3'-8" - 4'-6" 2 - 2X10 1 4'-6" - 5'-6" 2 - 2X12 1 GREATER THAN 5'-6" SEE PLAN 2 WOOD HEADER/BEAM SUPPORT COLUMNS BEAM/HEADER COLUMN (IN 2X4 WALL) COLUMN (IN 2X6 WALL) DETAIL DIMENSIONAL LUMBER (2X10, 2X8, 2X6, 2X4) (EA END) 2X4 JACK 2X4 KING STUD (EA END) 2X6 JACK 2X6 KING STUD 2X LUMBER <-2XJACK 2X KING DIMENSIONAL LUMBER (2X12) (EA END) (2) 2X4 JACK 2X4 KING STUD (EA END) (2) 2X6 JACK 2X6 KING STUD 2X LUMBER (2)2XJACK 2X KING 2 - 1 3/4" LVLS ALL 12" LVLS TO BE 11 7/8" (EA END) (2) 2X4 JACK 2X4 KING STUD (EA END) (2) 2X6 JACK 2X6 KING STUD 2X LVL (2)2XJACK 2X KING 3 - 1 3/4" LVLS ALL 12" LVLS TO BE 11 7/8" (EA END) (2) 2X4 JACK 2X4 KING STUD (EA END) (2) 2X6 JACK 2X6 KING STUD 3X LVL (2)2XJACK 2X KING (6) 3 1 /2" DIVISION 2-SITEWORK I. CLEAR AREA OF SITE AT LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF ALL EXISTING GROWTH AND VEGETATION, REMOVING DEBRIS FROM SITE. STOCKPILE TOPSOIL ON SITE WHERE APPROVED BY BUILDING INSPECTOR. 2. STAKE CORNERS OF BUILDING FOR OWNER AND ARCHITECT'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE ORIGINAL STAKED LOCATION OF THE BUILDING 3. FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED SOIL AT THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR IF OVER -EXCAVATED; COMPACTED FILL SHALL BE PLACED TO THE ELEVATIONS REQUIRED FOR BEARING. A MINIMUM 3'-6" COVER FOR FROST PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR EXTERIOR FOOTINGS. 4. NO BACKFILLING SHALL OCCUR SOONER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER POURING OF CONCRETE. 5. BACKFILLING MATERIALS SHALL BE CLEAN SAND FOR INSIDE FOUNDATIONS AND EXCAVATED SAND, GRAVEL OR CLAY FOR EXTERIOR OF FOUNDATIONS PLACED IN SUCCESSIVE HORIZONTAL LAYERS ON OVER 8" THICK, LOOSE MEASUREMENT, WITH EACH LAYER THOROUGHLY COMPACTED AND PLACED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE FOUNDATION WALLS, FOOTINGS OR OTHER WORK IN PLACE. 6. BACKFILL WITH SAND OR OTHER APPROVED GRANULAR FILL IN AREAS WHERE CAST IRON AND CLAY TILE PIPES ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS WELL AS EXCAVATED AREAS WHERE SLAB ON GRADE WILL BE POURED. 7. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4" OF COMPACTED PEA GRAVEL FILL FOR ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE INTERIOR CONCRETE SLABS AND EXTERIOR CONCRETE WORK. FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO 90% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY. 8. THE SITE SHALL BE ROUGH GRADED AND EXCESS DIRT HAULED AWAY. NO BLACK DIRT OR LANDSCAPING IS INCLUDED. 9. FINAL GRADE ENTIRE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION TO 1" IN TEN (10) FEET USING TOP SOIL FROM STOCKPILE. 10. A MINIMUM PERIMETER CHAIN -LINK FENCING OF FIVE (5) FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL BE REQUIRED. DIVISION 3 • CONCRETE 1. PROVIDE ALL CONCRETE WORK, FOR ALL TRADES REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT. WORK INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, FOOTINGS, FOUNDATION WALLS, PIERS, FLOOR SLABS AND WALKS. 2. CONCRETE WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST VERSION OF "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE" (ACI 318) AND "SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE" (ACI 301). 3. READY -MIXED CONCRETE SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM C 94 4. FOR PROJECT SITE MIXING, MEASURE. BATCH, AND MIX CONCRETE MATERIAL AND CONCRETE ACCORDING TO ASTM C 94. MIX CONCRETE MATERIALS IN APPROPRIATE DRUM - TYPE BATCH MACHINE MIXER. 5. ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON MINIMUM 3000 PSF. UNDISTURBED SOIL. 6. CONCRETE USED FOR ALL EXTERIOR FLATWORK SHALL BE SIX (6) BAG PORTLAND CEMENT PER CUBIC YARD (4000 PSI) CONCRETE FOR ALL INTERIOR FLATWORK SHALL BE 5 1/2 BAG PORTLAND CEMENT PER CUBIC YARD (3500 PSI) 7. CONCRETE USED FOR FOUNDATION WALLS, FOOT I NGS AND ALL OTHER CONCRETE IN FORMS DIVISION 6 - V 1. ALL V1 CON 2. ALL Li LUMB BOAR AGEN 3. ALL P MARl4 GU IDI 4. STRE WOOI OTH E 5. TREA STRIF 6. INSTA LESS ON W FRAM FRAM 7. DO NI ENDS 8. DO N( FROM 9. P ROV UNLE 10. PROV 11. P ROV 12. PROV 13. NOTC 14. 15. i 66' y -S / IV 3 Subject Meeting Fiscal Impact (Y/N) Dollar Amount Budget Source Category Type Information Item Cover Page PZ-13-26 / 1 E. Rand Road / CU: Car Wash / VB Final September 24, 2026 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1 0 NEW BUSINESS Action Item The Petitioner, El Car Wash Mid -West, LLC, is seeking conditional use approval to allow a car wash, at 1 E. Rand Road (Subject Property). The proposal requires Village Board approval for the conditional use request. The proposal meets the requirements and standards related to the Village Code, and staff is supportive of the request. Discussion The Petitioner is requesting conditional use approval to redevelop the 2.04-acre property at 1 E. Rand Road with an automated car wash. The B-3 Community Shopping District zoned property is currently improved with a vacant 20,880-square-foot commercial building, which would be demolished as part of the redevelopment. The proposed development includes a 140-foot car wash tunnel, twenty-seven (27) vacuum stalls, three (3) approach lanes, two (2) pay stations, fifty-one (51) vehicle stacking spaces, seven (7) accessory structures, landscaping, and an underground stormwater detention facility. A Traffic Impact Study reviewed by the Village Engineer concluded that the proposed access and surrounding roadway network can accommodate projected traffic volumes. The final site plan provides fifty-one (51) stacking spaces, compared with seven (7) required by the Zoning Ordinance. Staff does not anticipate significant adverse traffic impacts, and Public Works has no objections to the conditional use request. Due to the proximity of residential properties west of Elmhurst Road, an acoustic assessment was also completed. The development incorporates the study"s recommended noise mitigation measures, including an ultra -quiet drying system, sound walls, screening and enclosure of vacuum equipment, and vacuum silencers. The assessment concluded that the proposed facility would comply with applicable Illinois Pollution Control Board noise regulations with these measures in place. WRTOW • Page 80 of 455 findsSTAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff . proposed conditional use mee- applicable st. •. • of • • Ordinance and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Corridor Commercial future land use designation. The proposed car wash and associated site improvements represent an appropriate use on . parcel that. ' • underutilized for a long time. The car wash is not 'd to endanger public health, safety,• .' • • or .l welfare. The traffto study and sound assessment provided do not suggest that the proposal will generate nuisances that will be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. Based on the information submitted, the surrounding uses, and the proposed development's compliance with the Village"s zoning ordinance and long-range planning document, staff recommends approval of the conditional use request. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the conditional use for a car wash with seven (7) accessory structures, subject to the conditions identified in the staff report, including required noise mitigation measures, perimeter fencing, architectural treatments,, lighting restrictions,, and limitations on hours of operation. Alternatives A. Approval of a conditional use for a car wash with seven (7) accessory structures at 1 E. Rand Road, Case No. PZ-13-26, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. B. Action at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff Recommendation Approval of a conditional use for a car wash with seven (7) accessory structures at 1 E. Rand Road, Case No. PZ-13-26, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Attachments 1. PZ-13-26 Staff Report 2. PZ-13-26 Administrative Content 3. PZ-13-26 Plans 4. PZ-13-26 Photos of Constructed El Car Wash Facilities 5. PZ-13-26 Technical Reports 6. PZ-13-26 Stormwater Narrative 7. PZ-13-26 Village Review Letter Page 81 of 455 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development Jason C Shallcross, AICP, CEcD Ann Choi Director of Community Development Senior Development Planner DATE: September 17, 2026 CASE NUMBER PZ-13-26 PUBLIC HEARING DATE September 24, 2026 APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER El Car Wash Mid -West, LLC / SCP 2002A-11 LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 1 E. Rand Road BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST The Petitioner, El Car Wash Mid -West, LLC, is seeking conditional use approval to allow a car wash with seven (7) accessory structures, at 1 E. Rand Road (Subject Property). The proposal requires Village Board approval for the conditional use request. The proposal meets the requirements and standards related to the Village Code, and staff is supportive of the request. 2026 Aerial Image 2026 Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Map EXISTING EXISTING LAND USE/ SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE SIZE OF ZONING SITE IMPROVEMENTS North: B-3 Community Shopping PROPERTY B-3 Community Vacant one-story East: B-4 Corridor Commercial and 2.04 acres Shopping commercial building B-3 Community Shopping South: B-3 Community Shopping West: R-A Single Family Residential and B-4 Corridor Commercial STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVE WITH APPROVE CONDITIONS DENY C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 1 Page 82 of 455 BACKGROUND / PROPERTY HISTORY The Subject Property was annexed in 1966 and is located at 1 East Rand Road in the southwest quadrant of the intersection ofI(ensington Road with Rand Road. The Subject Property is zoned B-3 Community Shopping District. The project site is improved with an existing 20,880-square-foot vacant commercial building that was previously occupied by CVS, Murray's Auto Parts, O'Reilly's, and Subway. Short-term merchants have since been permitted to operate within the building during seasonal holidays. Land uses in the vicinity of the Subject Property are primarily commercial and residential. Nearby commercial uses include Chipotle, Wild Fork, Five Guys, and Jersey Mike's to the northeast; Lush Nail Spa to the northwest; Bullet Auto Repair and Skyline Auto Group to the west; and Kimber Automotive and Intelligent Plumbing Services to the south. Single-family residences are Located on the west side of Elmhurst Road. Vehicular access is provided by an existing curb cut on North Main Street and an existing curb cut on East Rand Road. As part of the Rand Road Corridor Plan, which was approved by the Village of Mount Prospect Board of Trustees in February 2017, the Village is improving the roadway geometry of the US 12/IL-83/Kensington Road intersection. The primary goals of the project include reducing vehicle congestion and delays and improving safety. The scope of work includes road widening (additional through and turn lanes) and resurfacing, traffic signal improvements, street lighting, bike path, and sidewalk improvements. The Village in coordination with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) are currently in Phase II Engineering and Land Acquisition for significant capacity improvements to improve the flow of traffic through these intersections. Final plans are complete, but the Village is currently undergoing negotiations with a few properties to acquire rights -of -way. Construction is anticipated beginning in the Spring of 2027 and completion of the intersection improvements is anticipated in the Fall of 2028. PROPOSAL The Petitioner is proposing to demolish the existing building and associated site improvements and construct a car wash that will be operated by El Car Wash. El Car Wash is marketed as an automated car wash and consists of a primary car wash tunnel, an attached building housing interior vacuum stations, an exterior parking lot with additional vacuum stations, two (2) drive -through pay stations, and an underground stormwater detention facility toward the southern portion of the Subject Property. The proposed facility will operate on weekdays from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM seven days a week. The business will employ a maximum of seven (7) employees per shift during peak times. Peak hours on weekdays are typically 8:00 AM -10:00 AM and 4:00 PM -7:00 PM. Peak hours on weekends are typically 11:00 AM - 3:00 PM. The proposal meets all bulk regulations and parking setbacks and the number of accessory structures is included as part of the conditional use request. A total of seven (7) accessory structures are proposed. The various elements of the proposal are outlined below. Site Plan: The 140-foot-long automated car wash tunnel will be located on the west side of the site and oriented in a north -south direction. Sixteen (16) vacuum stalls will be located within an attached building along the east side of the car wash tunnel, with an additional eleven (11) exterior vacuum stalls located within the parking area east of the attached building. Access to the car wash tunnel will be provided via the entrances along the Rand Road and Main Street/IL-83 frontages. Vehicles approaching the tunnel will enter one of three approach lanes, which will merge into two lanes serving C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 2 Page 83 of 455 the pay stations. Per staff's recommendation, a minimum four -foot (4'-0") tall fence is proposed along the north, east, and west property lines to screen headlights from vehicles within the car wash approach and stacking lanes, and to minimize glare onto vehicular traffic traveling along the adjacent arterial roadways. Immediately beyond the pay stations, the two lanes will merge into a single lane Leading to the car wash tunnel entrance, located toward the northwest portion of the site. Vehicles will travel south through the tunnel and exit near the southwest portion of the site. Upon exiting the tunnel, vehicles may proceed to the vacuum stalls or exit the site via one of the access drives. Bulk Regulations and Parking Setbacks: Table 1 provides a comparison of the required bulk regulations of the B-3 zoning district and the proposed car wash. Table 1: Setbacks and Lot Coverage Requirements Front North (Kensington) 30.0' 80.0' Interior side N/A 10.0' N/A Exterior side West (IL-83/Main St) 30.0' 30.0' Exterior side East (Rand) 30.0' 52.3' Rear yard South 20.0' 59.5' Building Height - 3 stories or 35' 35' Max Lot Coverage - 75.0% 64.4% Parking, Stacking and Traffic: Per Section 14.2207 of the Zoning Ordinance, the following parking ratio fora car wash is as follows: Use Parking Requirements Car wash, tunnel Stacking spaces for 20 minutes of waiting plus 1 space per employee. (3 minutes average per car, plus 1 space per employee.) Based on the Village's parking ratio, the project requires a total of seven (7) stacking spaces and seven (7) parking spaces based on a total of seven (7) employees, including two (2) accessible parking spaces. The proposed car wash proposes atotal offifty-one (51) stacking spaces and twenty-seven (27) parking spaces, including two (2) accessible parking spaces. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS), prepared by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA), was reviewed by the Village Engineer. The TIS analyzed the site based on an automatic car wash consisting of one car wash tunnel, twenty-eight (28) vacuum stalls, two (2) approach lanes, and internal stacking capacity for thirty-nine (39) vehicles without impacting or obstructing external drive aisles. The final site plan proposes twenty-seven (27) vacuum stalls, three (3) approach lanes, and stacking capacity for fifty- one (51) vehicles. Compared to the site configuration analyzed in the TIS, the final plan provides one fewer vacuum stall and an additional approach lane, resulting in twelve (12) additional stacking spaces. The TIS concluded that the proposed site access will adequately accommodate projected traffic volumes and provide efficient access to and from the site. The existing access drive along IL 83 will be converted to right-in/right-out access and dedicated right -turn lanes serving the site access drives are not warranted based on IDOT guidelines. Additionally, the proposed on -site vehicle stacking is CAUsers\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 3 Page 84 of 455 anticipated to accommodate projected demand without obstructing internal site circulation or operations. Based on the TIS and the final site plan, staff does not anticipate that the proposed development will result in significant adverse traffic impacts. The proposed development provides substantial on -site stacking capacity that exceeds code requirements by more than seven times the number of stacking stalls required and addresses the anticipated demand during normal operations and peak operating conditions, or "design days," which typically occur following weather events such as snowfall or rain and are anticipated approximately twelve (12) to fifteen (15) times per year. To further accommodate peak demand and maintain efficient on -site circulation during these periods, operational measures include increasing the service rate of the car wash tunnel to its maximum processing capacity and positioning staff at critical locations within the circulation system to direct vehicles and manage traffic flow. These locations include the pay stations and the exit of the car wash tunnel. The Village's Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed plans and TIS and has no further concerns regarding the requested conditional use. However, comments identified in the final zoning review letter will be required to be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. The final zoning review letter is attached as Exhibit B of the staff report. Hours of Operation: According to the Petitioner, the proposed hours of operation will be from 7:00 AM — 8:00 PM Monday through Sunday. Peak hours on weekdays are anticipated to be 8:00 AM —10:00 AM and 4:00 PM — 7:00 PM, and peak hours on weekends are anticipated to be 11:00 AM - 3:00 PM. Based on the closest El Car Wash locations in Michigan, the hours of operation at these locations are 7:00 AM — 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday, and 8:00 AM — 8:00 PM on Sunday. Staff recommends restricting the business' hours of operation to 7:00 AM — 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday, and 8:00 AM — 8:00 PM on Sunday as a condition of approval consistent with other El Car Wash locations. Building Materials: The proposed building features a modern commercial design characterized by clean, rectilinear building forms, prominent tower elements, and a predominantly light-colored exterior. The building incorporates varying parapet heights and changes in wall plane. The proposed car wash tunnel and attached vacuum building are composed almost entirely of light-colored brick veneer (Aspen White Smooth and Khaki Stone) with a base composed of dark grey split face concrete masonry unit (CMU). The split -face nature of the masonry provides a stone -like base for the proposed principal structure. Reflective aluminum composite panels make up the upper portions of the tower elements and at the entrance/exit of the car wash tunnel. Bright teal and pink/magenta accents are integrated into trim, signage, canopies, and other architectural details to reinforce the company's branding and identity. Landscaping: The Petitioner will preserve existing parkway trees along I L-83/Main Street, Kensington Road and Rand Road. The proposed landscape plan meets code requirements and provides substantial perimeter landscaping along all sides of the Subject Property. Along the south property Line, the existing dense row of mature trees and landscaping adjacent to Intelligent Plumbing and Kimber Automotive will be preserved and supplemented with an additional layer of evergreen trees and shrubs. The north and east property lines will be landscaped primarily with evergreen shrubs and ornamental trees to supplement existing vegetation and fill gaps between the existing parkway trees. Foundation landscaping is proposed along the west elevation of the car wash tunnel and the east elevation of the attached vacuum building. Landscape islands throughout the parking area will C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 4 Page 85 of 455 incorporate shade trees and additional live plantings. The trash enclosure will be screened with juniper trees ranging from six feet (6'-0") to eight feet (8'-0") in height. A variety of perennial plantings and other Live landscaping is also proposed north of the car wash tunnel and vacuum building to further enhance the site. A fully compliant landscape plan, including a tree preservation plan and irrigation plan, will be required as part of the building permit submittal. Accessory Structures: Per Village Code, detached accessory structures are permitted to be a maximum height often feet (10'). The project proposes a total of seven (7) accessory structures, including two (2) canopies over the exterior vacuum stations, one (1) trash enclosure, one (1) canopy over the pay station, one (1) attendant booth, and two (2) vacuum enclosures. All accessory structures meet the maximum height of ten feet (10 Y-0.99), Site Lighting: The Petitioner intends to install code -compliant signage throughout the site, including: six (6) light poles and one (1) wall mounted fixture. All proposed fixtures will be fully cut-off with flat Lenses. A fully compliant photometric plan will be required as part of building permit submittal. Signage: The Petitioner proposes one new monument sign along Kensington Road. The building elevations depict a total of three wall signs, with one sign located on each of the north, west, and east elevations. The sign package also includes three directional signs and two-lane identification signs. The submitted sign plans indicate that all proposed signage will comply with the requirements of Chapter 7 of the Village Code. No relief from the Village's sign regulations is requested as part of the zoning application; therefore, all signage proposed for the Subject Property will be required to comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 7 as part of the building permit review. Stormwater: Stormwater runoff from the proposed development will be collected by a system of storm sewer inlets and piping and conveyed to a proposed underground detention facility located in the southern portion of the site. The proposed detention facility will provide temporary storage and discharge stormwater through a reinforced concrete outlet control structure designed to restrict post - development runoff to the allowable release rate. The controlled discharge will connect to the existing 24-inch PVC storm sewer within the IL-83 right-of-way, maintaining the discharge sewer. Volume control is not required for the proposed redevelopment because the project reduces the site's total impervious area by more than 30 percent relative to existing conditions, in accordance with the MWRD Watershed Management Ordinance. A Stormwater Narrative is included in the agenda packet. Noise: An acoustic assessment, prepared by Soundscape Engineering, was reviewed by planning staff. The report documents the ambient sound level measurements, provides predictions of car wash - related sound at neighboring properties, and provides an opinion on compliance with the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) regulations (35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 900/901/910). The assessment modeled the "worst -case" conditions with the car wash entry and exit doors open, the vacuum building doors open, and six (6) outdoor vacuuming stations in use (half of total) for comparison to the ordinance, with and without mitigation. An analysis on measurement data were based from two existing El Car Wash sites in Brighton and Madison Heights, both in Michigan, measurement data of the site ambient, and the manufacturer's dryer sound data. The analysis was also based on a 4,830 square -foot car wash tunnel, an 11,016 square -foot enclosed vacuum structure with sixteen (16) vacuum stations inside, a pair of vacuum pumps inside a roofed enclosure on the north side of the vacuum building, twelve (12) outdoor vacuum stations, a pair of vacuum pumps within a screen wall on the east side of the building, and operating hours that are 7:00AM to8:00 PM daily. The loudest sound source was found to be the dryer system followed by the vacuum pumps. The operating hours C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx Page 86 of 455 were based on 7:00AM to 8:00 PM daily. Due to the proximity to the residences on the west side of Elmhurst Road, the Petitioner is proposing to upgrade the drying system to a Stealth Predator Ultra - Quiet Drying System. The stealth system's data were used in place of the standard dryers at the Petitioner's request. The sound assessment found that if the following mitigation measures were incorporated into the site, the predicted sound would meet all IPCB regulations: a 30 horsepower (HP) Stealth Predator Ultra -Quiet drying system; a two -hundred -foot (200'-0") long, eight -foot (8'-0") tall sound wall at the south property line; a twelve -foot (12'-0") tall wall at the car wash tunnel exit; an eight -foot (8'-0") tall screen wall surrounding the east outdoor vacuum pump, and a north vacuum pump located on the north side of vacuum building within a full enclosure and exhaust stack above roof. The Petitioner has incorporated all mitigation measures into the proposed development, and staff is recommending these measures be incorporated as a condition of approval. OTHER DEPARTMENTS The Public Works Department has no objections to the conditional use request; however, several items will be required to be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit. The proposed right- in/right-out access drives along Main Street and Rand Road may require modifications to accommodate sidewalks and shared -use paths and will be subject to Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) approval. Permits will also be required from IDOT for work within the adjacent rights -of -way and from the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) for applicable sanitary service and stormwater management improvements. Public Works has no objection to the submitted Stormwater Narrative but will require additional information regarding overland flow routing, emergency overflow, system capacity, detention facilities, and unrestricted stormwater runoff to adjacent properties or public rights -of -way as part of the building permit review. PUBLIC COMMENT As of this writing, planning staff has not received any public comments. STANDARDS AND FINDINGS The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the standards and findings of fact outlined in Exhibit A and 1) accept them without changes, 2) accept them with changes, or 3) reject the findings. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall use the findings of fact to guide their recommendation to the Village Board. Staff finds that the proposed conditional use meets the applicable standards contained in the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. Staff requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt Staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: "To adopt staff's findings, attached as Exhibit A, as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of: 1. A conditional use for a car wash with seven (7) accessory structures at 1 E. Rand Road, subject to the following conditions: a. The Subject Property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the approved development plans which consist of the following (collectivelythe "Approved Plans"): C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx Page 87 of 455 i. "Site Development Plans for 1 E Rand Rd", consisting of 15 sheets, prepared by Stonefield Engineering & Design and bearing the latest revision date of 08/21/2026; ii. Architectural drawings, consisting of 12 sheets, prepared by Krieger Klatt Architects and bearing the latest revision date of 06.04.2026; iii. "Traffic Impact Study", consisting of 216 pages, prepared by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA) and dated June 4, 2026; iv. "Sound Propagation Assessment" (Soundscape Study), consisting of 35 pages, prepared by Soundscape Engineering and dated August 21, 2026; and v. Specification sheets for: 1. "Stealth Predator Drying System", consisting of 2 pages, manufactured by International Drying Corporations and undated. 2. "Sound Walls", consisting of 16 pages, manufactured by AIL Sound Walls. b. The following shall be required to mitigate the noise generated by the blowers at entrance and exit doors open and multiple vehicles using the outdoor vacuums in conformance with the recommendations provided in the Soundscape Study: i. A 30 horsepower (HP) Stealth Predator Ultra Quiet drying system shall be used; ii. The sound wall along the southern property line shall be eight feet (8'-0") in height and a minimum of two hundred feet (200'-0") feet long; iii. The sound wall at the car wash tunnel exit shall be twelve feet (12'-0") in height; iv. The screen wall surrounding the east outdoor vacuum pump shall be eight -feet (8'- 0") in height; and v. The vacuum pump located on north side of vacuum building shall be fully enclosed and shall be equipped with an exhaust stack above the roof. c. Silencers/mufflers shall be placed on each of the vacuums. d. All exterior lighting shall be limited to white light only. e. Lighting shall not be permitted on the arched vacuum equipment. f. Both the sound wall at the exit of the car wash tunnel and along the southern property line shall be consistent in appearance with the principal structure. g. A privacy fence primarily consisting of fiber cement and not exceeding four feet (4') in height shall be installed along the perimeter of the drive -through queuing lane. h. The attendance booths and related canopy structure shall be adorned with a brick veneer and stone coping consistent in appearance with the principal structure. i. The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM, Monday through Saturday, and 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM on Sunday. j. Prior to the Village Board meeting, the Petitioner shall address all comments included in the Village review letter dated September 11, 2026 (PZ-1 3-26) attached as Exhibit B. k. Submittal of irrigation and photometric plans that comply with Village codes and regulations is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. L. Compliance with all applicable development, fire, and other Village Codes and regulations, subject to the approvals and other relief granted by this Ordinance is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. ATTACHMENTS: ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENT PLANS OTHER (Supplemental Information, (Zoning Request Application, Responses to (Plat of Survey, Site Plan, etc.) Public Comments Received, Standards, etc.) etc...) C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 7 Page 88 of 455 I concur: Jason C Shallcross,. l P, CEcD Director of Community Development C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx Page 89 of 455 Exhibit A Standards and Findings of Fact CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance provides that a Conditional Use shall conform to the following requirements: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located; 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; 5. That adequate measures have been or will betaken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current comprehensive plan for the village; and 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the planning and zoning commission. Petitioner's Findings: The Petitioner states that the proposed automated car wash will not adversely affect public health, safety, or general welfare and has been designed to provide safe and efficient on - site circulation. The Petitioner further states that the development incorporates measures intended to minimize potential impacts on surrounding properties, including substantial perimeter landscaping and fencing, enclosed vacuum equipment with silencers, an underground stormwater management system, and a water reclamation system. According to the Petitioner, the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding commercial corridor and will not impede the normal and orderly development of neighboring properties. Adequate public utilities and infrastructure will be provided in accordance with Village requirements, and the proposed water reclamation and stormwater management systems are intended to reduce demands on public infrastructure and manage runoff on -site. The Petitioner further states that the proposed access and internal circulation have been designed to safely accommodate anticipated traffic, with a traffic study concluding that traffic generated by the development can be accommodated by the surrounding roadway network. The Petitioner maintains that the redevelopment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the future Corridor Commercial land use designation by reinvesting in an underutilized commercial property and providing an auto -oriented service use along the corridor. Finally, the Petitioner states that the development will comply with applicable regulations of the Community Shopping District and that any necessary modifications will continue to be coordinated with Village staff and addressed in accordance with applicable Village requirements. Staff's Findings: Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for conditional use approval for a car wash and finds that the applicable standards have been met. The conditional use is aligned with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Plan's designation of the Subject Property as Corridor C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx Page 90 of 455 Commercial. The proposed car wash and associated site improvements represent an appropriate use on a parcel that has remained underutilized for a long time. The car wash is not expected to endanger public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The traffic study and sound assessment provided do not suggest that the proposal will generate nuisances that will be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. Based on the information submitted, the surrounding uses, and the proposed development's compliance with the Village's zoning ordinance and long-range planning document, staff recommends approval of the conditional use request. C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 10 Page 91 of 455 Exhibit B Village Review Comments MAYOR Paul Wrn. Hoefert TRUSTEES Vincent J. Dante Elizabeth B. DiPrima Terri Gens William A. Grossi John 3. Matuszak Colleen E. Saccotelti Village of Mount Prospect 510 S. Emerson Street, Mount (Prospect, Illinois 16,0056 September 11, 21026 Vincenzo Fin�azzo Stonefield Engineering & Design 555S.O[iO\i,/oo(O�v,?.r,klAvie�t.-t..je - Birmingham, MI 48009 is e-mail : vfina�z,zoCa),stonefieldeIng.com VILLAGE MANAGER Michael J. Ca ad VILLAGE CLEIRK Karen Agoiranos Phone: 84,7/962-6000 Fax: 847/92-6022 www. imountprospect.org Re: PZ-131-126 (PZZ26-000012) / Conditiona1 Use (Car Wash) / 1 E Rand Rd Review Comments #4 (Final) Dear IMr. Finazzo, The Village of Mount Prospect has, reviewed the third submittal for a conditional, use for, a car wash at 1 Fast Band Rd (S u bj ect Property), a n d below are the folio in,g revi ew co m m ents from applicable departments: Planning Division* Items 1-7 require revisions prior to the Village Board meeting. Please submit these revisions no late r than September 18, 2026: 1 Split -face CMU is not an acceptable material for thetrash enclosure or the vacuum enclosure located on the east side of the building. Both accessory structures shall be constructed of brick veneer to match the principal building's primary building material and color. 2. Sound cape Report: The revised soundscape report states that by using 30 HP Stealth Predator, Ultra Quiet dryers in Heu of 80 HP)�: a., 'The 12-ft tall screen wall at the tun net entrance can be removed; b. The 12-ft tall screen wall at the tunnel exit can be shortened to 210 feet long; c. The2-inchthicksound absorptive acoustical panels can be eliminated onthe 12-ft,tall, tunnel exit oin the east wall. 3. If the 12-floot-tall, screen wall at the tunnel exit is intended to serve as the sound wall identified in the specification sheet, "Sound Wall Dietaits.pdf," pilease add a note to, the architectural site plan indicating this,. The siound wall is currently identified on the civil site plan. C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 11 Page 92 of 455 Exhibit B Village Review Comments Village of Mount Prospect I Page 2 4. Is the,8-ft, tall, 2010-ft long wall along the south property line made from lightweight PVC panels such as the AIL Sound Wall provided in the spec sheet "'Sound Wall Details -pdf"? Provide details/drawings, of this wall in the architectural drawing set. 5. Sheet C-2: a. Remove the note"' Proposed 12 Ft Sound Wall" at the tunnel entrance. b. Update the note "'PROPOSED +/,- 2 FT DECORATIVE KNEE WALL along theeast property lineto "PROPOSED MIN. 4 FT TALL SCREEN WALL". 6. All liandscape, plantings must be located entirely on private property. Some shrubs are located directly on the east property line. 7. The base, olf,the monument sign (page 4 of the sign package) shall have a masonry base (not'. C M U). 8. A materials sample board includingthe make/modiel of each material type shall be provided apt the Villa Board meeting. 9. Please review the modified) irecomrneindled conditions of appirloval at the end of this letter. Pulblic Wolrks Department: Puiblic Works has, reviewed the plans and traffic study submitted for the El Carwash proposed at 1 E. Rand Road', and Ihas ino objections to, the requested ConiditionaL Use,. The comments listed below need not be addressed Ipiriorto conditlionial uise approval, they will, have to be addressed prior to issuance of a Builiding Permit: 10., The plan now shows the driveways onto Main Street and IRand Road to be modified to restrict ,access to right-in/right-out. The driveway designos may have to be modified to accommodate s I idewalks and shared -use paths,,, and will have to be approved by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDoT),. 11. Permits will be: required from IDoT for any work (including utility connectioini,$) within the MIain Striee't, Kensington Road, or Rand Road rights of way, and from the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greatier Chicago (MWRD) for any sanitary service or st,ormwater manalgernient. improvements. 12. PW has n�o objection to the Stor,mwater Narrative provided prieviously, but, additional information will be required prior to issuing the Building Permit. This information includes, but. is not limited to the following: a. Indicate the overland flow routing and emergency overflow (Location on the grading ,and/or storm,wiater management plan., b. Confirm that the proposed system (storm sewer, overland flow paths, and inlet grates) has sufficient capacity to convey the s1ormwater runoff from the 1 00-year storm into the detention storage chamber. c. Provide details of the detention chamber and outlet structure. C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 12 Page 93 of 455 Exhibit B Village Review Comments Village of Mount Prospect I Page 3 d. Identify areas of' the site that drain to neighboring properties or public right of way instead of draining toward the detention storage chamber. Accountfor this unrestricted flow in the release rate calculations. Again, the commients, listed above need not be addressed pr,ioir to Conditional Use approval, but will have to be addressed prior to signing the MWRD permit', or issuing the Building Permit. It must be understood that the comments listed above reflect issues noted during a review of the piroposed concept. A thorough review of the site, design and details will Ibe performed as part of the Building Permit review process. Building IC epartment: 13. N�o additional comments from previous reviews. Provide a full code analysis, uise groups, architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing drawings compliant with adopted and referenced codes. Fire Department: Please advise the applicant that the following items m� ust be included duringthe building permit pirocess. 14. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with INFPA 13 will be required foir this project. Ensure fire I ,spirinkLer shop drawings, hydraulic calculations, and equipment cut sheets are submitted for review. Village of Mount Prospect Fire Prevention Code, 24.,210 15. A fire alarm system will be required for this project. Ensure that the fire alarm shop drawings with point-to-point wiring diagram�s,, battery iload calculations, and equipment cut sheets are submitted for review. 16. A fire sprinkler room will Ibe required for, this building. 17. An egress Ipllan must be providedforthe entire building. This plan muist include occupant loads, travel distances, egress widths, and common path of travel distances. An egress plan will be required when the building plans are submitted for review. Additional exits, may be required,. 18. Fire lanes, will be requiiredl Ibased on the site ireview. Additional, marking of fire Lanes will be required,. 19. All egress doom are to use keyles s, loic ksets on the egress side. N o flush (bolts, dead or draw blotts, etc. will, be allowed. Life Safety Code, 7.2.1.5.1 C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 13 Page 94 of 455 Exhibit B Village Review Comments Village of Mount Prospect I Page 4 Recommended Conditions of Approval: (Please note that additional conditions of approval may be added.) A. The following are, required to, mitigate the noise generated by the, blowers at entrance, and exit, doors open and multiple vehicles using the outdoor vacuums: a. A 3,0 HP Stealth Predator Ultra Quiet drying system is required; b. An e i g ht-,f o ot-ta! It 1(8 10") sound watt at the south property linethat is a minimum of 200 feet long; c. A twelve -foot -tall (12'1-10") wall at the carwash tunnel, exit; d. An eight -foot -tall (8'-10") sicreen wall, surrounding the east olutdoorvacuum pump; and e. The vacuum pump Located on north sidle of vacuum building shall be fully enclosed and shall be equipped with an exhaust stack above the rololf. B. Silencers/mufflers shall be placed on each of the vacuums. C. All, exterior lighting shall be limited to white (tight only. D. Lighting shall not be permitted on the arched vacuum equipment. If any changes, are requested, please make the changes as noted above any! sulbrniit a point- by-poii nt re s pion letter a ncl pdf files of the d rawings. Please upload revi si o ns into the portal. Feel free to contact Ann Choi at (847) 818-53 14/ a c ho i @1 rnio u ntp ro s p ect. ol rg if you have a iny questions. ic: File Sincerely, Ann Choi Development Planner Village of Mount Prospect, C:\Users\achoi\Desktop\PZ-13-26 1 E Rand Rd (CU - Car Wash).docx 14 Page 95 of 455 El Check if Same as Applicant Name: Patrick J.W. & Lee Sen Chiang Corporation: Family Trust Address: 23 Monaco City, State, ZIP Code: Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: Email: Page 97 of 455 In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Applicant: [ZoningPermit:::9724:::79799 WIDTH=OPX HEIGHT=OPX] Date: (Print or Type Name) Vincenzo Finazzo If applicant is not property owner: hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner: (Print or Type Name) Date: Page 98 of 455 ViLtage of Mount Prospect Community DevieLopment Department 50 Sl. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, 11,11n,ois 610056 P COUNTY OF STATE OF ILW4&iS hs� u nde r o at h , state that I a m (print namei), the sote owner of the p,roperty an owner of theproperty an auth�arjzed off [cer for the awl of the property 1 E. Rand Road,,, Mount Prospect, IL, 60056 commonly described a p e rity ad d reSs a n d P I N') Parcel D.- 03-34-250011111.001-0000 < and that such property is, owned by', this, diate:. (Print name) wllpVlre elf M, 4 g10 , N olta ry Pu b1i c . . ................... . .. . . . . MiAll R I E TH puwic, State of N (.),2-26-2029 �%1, "IN117 Nlwtaily 11D 1,347805,11',4,4, . . . . ....... ",", 71 Sign,, a Page 99 of 455 V Mage of Mount Prosplect i St Go m m u �n i ty D ehve Lo p m e n it, D e pa rit m le rtit 50 S,. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Rlin,oihsl 60056, Phone: (847) 818-5328 'hecklif Same, as, AppLicant 0 ('11, on, "", ) 11 Name: , ) - A I Corpora,flion'lli, ,)C. Lo (o",? Address,1111 ev') -:01 ..................... . . .. . . ..... l ..... — .. . . ... ........ .. .. ... . . ..... .... . . ....... . Z-`-11[ty, State,, Z11P Codeh: all I herebly affir'm thz,t attinfor maltilloin pro Weld herein and in aU materials subimitted a vi With this aPplicatlown aI,retrue and, accuratv to, the besl of my knowtedgesi lip Appli"cantisli Dialt"eVO-04/07/2026 (SignatUxe) Samantha, Blurgner (P r i n't o r Ty p e Ni a ml e) I hereby de�§*gnate the applica,nit, to act as, my agent for the purpose, of seeking th,le zon'ing requ described'in this appUcat' 'the asaoic' ated support' teriati. I ion and i ing me ..... . ..... P ro, p e rty Own,, e r* IS D a t le 04/0 7/2,02 6, (Signature) ww I (P rl'�� nt or Tye e N, am e!i) Page 100 of 455 ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE issued by: .. I :I„ `0, TIT'' IM,�r r m 1 0M I (,JR r.CE� mNY NOTICE Commitment Number: CCH12502356LI IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I -Requirements; Schedule B, Part II -Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Chicago Title Insurance Company, a Florida corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Amount of Insurance and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements have not been met within one hundred eighty (180) days after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. Countersigned By: Michael J. Nolan Authorized Officer or Agent Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: Michael J. Nolan, President Marjorie Nemzura, Secretary This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. ■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. (fIRI,' The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 1 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCHI2502356LI Page 101 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI Transaction Identification Data, for which the Company assumes no liability as set forth in Commitment Condition 5.e.: ORIGINATING OFFICE: FOR SETTLEMENT INQUIRIES, CONTACT: Chicago Title Insurance Company 35 W Wacker Drive, 10th Floor Chicago, IL 60601 Main Phone: (312)223-4627 Email: chicagocommercial@ctt.com Order Number: CCH12502356LI Property Ref.: NBU#251623-NCS/CVS#2799 SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: May 14, 2025 2. Policy to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy 2021 Proposed Insured: Core Ventures, LLC Proposed Amount of Insurance: $376007000.00 The estate or interest to be insured: Fee Simple (b) ALTA Loan Policy 2021 Proposed Insured: Lender with a contractual obligation under a loan agreement with the Proposed Insured for an Owner's Policy Proposed Amount of Insurance: $107000.00 The estate or interest to be insured: Fee Simple 3. The estate or interest in the Land at the Commitment Date is: Fee Simple 4. The Title is, at the Commitment Date, vested in: SCP 2002A-11 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, successor by merger with CVS 2799 Mt. Prospect, L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company 5. The Land is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF END OF SCHEDULE A This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. ■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. (fIRI A5sk"' d.Alii') The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 2 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 102 of 455 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description The North 361.6 feet of that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying West of center line of Rand Road, in Cook County, Illinois. This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA@ Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. AN,■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. �'���' The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 3 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 103 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Chicago Title Insurance Company 35 W Wacker Drive, 10th Floor Chicago, IL 60601 SCHEDULE B, PART I - Requirements All of the following Requirements must be met: 1. The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. 2. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. 3. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. 4. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. 5. Notice: Please be aware that due to the conflict between federal and state laws concerning the cultivation, distribution, manufacture or sale of marijuana, the Company is not able to close or insure any transaction involving Land that is associated with these activities. 6. Be advised that the "good funds" of the title insurance act (215 ILCS 155/26) became effective 1-1-2010. This act places limitations upon the settlement agent's ability to accept certain types of deposits into escrow. Please contact your local Chicago Title office regarding the application of this new law to your transaction. 7. Effective June 1, 2009, pursuant to Public Act 95-988, satisfactory evidence of identification must be presented for the notarization of any and all documents notarized by an Illinois notary public. Satisfactory identification documents are documents that are valid at the time of the notarial act; are issued by a state or federal government agency; bear the photographic image of the individual's face; and bear the individual's signature. 8. The Proposed Policy Amount(s) must be increased to the full value of the estate or interest being insured, and any additional premium must be paid at that time. An Owner's Policy should reflect the purchase price or full value of the Land. A Loan Policy should reflect the loan amount or value of the property as collateral. Proposed Policy Amount(s) will be revised and premiums charged consistent therewith when the final amounts are approved. END OF SCHEDULE B, PART I This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA@ Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. ■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. (fIRI The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 4 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 104 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Chicago Title Insurance Company 35 W Wacker Drive, 10th Floor Chicago, IL 60601 SCHEDULE B, PART II - Exceptions Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This Commitment and the Policy treat any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document will be excepted from coverage. The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company: General Exceptions 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by Public Records. 2. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 3. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the Public Records. 6. We should be furnished a properly executed ALTA statement and, unless the land insured is a condominium unit, a survey if available. Matters disclosed by the above documentation will be shown specifically 7. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter that appears for the first time in the Public Records or is created, attaches, or is disclosed between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Schedule B, Part I Requirements are met. 8. Note for additional information: the County Recorder requires that any documents presented for recording contain the following information: A. The name and address of the party who prepared the document; B. The name and address of the party to whom the document should be mailed after recording; C. All permanent real estate tax index numbers of any property legally described in the document; D. The address of any property legally described in the document; E. All deeds should contain the address of the grantee and should also note the name and address of the party to whom the tax bills should be sent. F. Any deeds conveying unsubdivided land, or, portions of subdivided and, may need to be accompanied by a properly executed "plat act affidavit." In addition, please note that the certain municipalities located in the County have enacted transfer tax ordinances. To record a conveyance of land located in these municipalities, the requirements of the transfer tax ordinances must be met. A conveyance of property in these cities may need to have the appropriate transfer tax stamps This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. ■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. (fIRI The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 5 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 105 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI a SCHEDULE B, PART II - Exceptions (continued) affixed before it can be recorded. This exception will not appear on the policy when issued. 1. Taxes for the year(s) 2024 and 2025 2025 taxes are not yet due or payable. 1 A. Note: 2024 first installment was due March 4, 2025 Note: 2024 final installment not yet due or payable Perm tax# Pcl Year 1 st I nst Stat 03-34-200-001-0000 1 of 1 2024 $987200.89 Paid 10. The following described portion of the Land apparently is not assessed for general real estate taxes for the year(s) 2024 and prior. This commitment/policy is subject to said taxes. Those portions of the Land falling within Rand Road, Kensington Road and Main Street. 11. Note: The land lies within a county which is subject to the Predatory Lending Database Act (765 ILCS 77/70 et seq. as amended). A Certificate of Compliance with the act or a Certificate of Exemption therefrom must be obtained at time of closing in order for the Company to record any insured mortgage. If the closing is not conducted by the company, a certificate of compliance or a certificate of exemption must be attached to any mortgage to be recorded. Note: for Cook, Kane, Will and Peoria counties, the act applies to mortgages recorded on or after July 1, 2010. 12. Mortgage, Security Agreement and Assignment of Leases and Rents dated October 9, 2002 as document no. 0021195422 made by SCP 2002A-11 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company to Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association, as Trustee, to secure an indebtedness in the amount of $7,536,425.58. 13. Assignment of Leases and Rents recorded October 30, 2002 as document no. 0021195423 made by SCP 2002A-11 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company to Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association, as Trustee. 14. Existing unrecorded leases and all rights thereunder of the lessees and of any person or party claiming by, through or under the lessees. 15. The Company should be furnished a statement that there is no property manager employed to manage the Land, or, in the alternative, a final lien waiver from any such property manager. 16. Municipal Real Estate Transfer Tax Stamps (or proof of exemption) must accompany any conveyance and certain other transfers or property located in the Village of Mount Prospect. Please contact said municipality prior to closing for its specific requirements, which may include the payment of fees, an inspection or other approvals. This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA@ Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. ■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. (fIRI The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 6 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 106 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI SCHEDULE B, PART II - Exceptions (continued) 17. The Land described in Schedule A either is unsubdivided property or constitutes part of a subdivided lot. As a result, a Plat Act Affidavit should accompany any conveyance to be recorded. In the alternative, compliance should be had with the provisions of the Plat Act (765 ILCS 205/1 et seq.) 18. The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title insurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance from the entity named below. Limited Liability Company: SCP 2002A-11 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, successor by merger with CVS 2799 Mt. Prospect, L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company. a. A copy of its operating agreement, if any, and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. b. If a domestic Limited Liability Company, a copy of its Articles of Organization and all amendments thereto with the appropriate filing stamps. c. If the Limited Liability Company is member -managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member. d. A current dated certificate of good standing from the proper governmental authority of the state in which the entity was created. e. If less than all members, or managers, as appropriate, will be executing the closing documents, furnish evidence of the authority of those signing. The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested documentation. 19. The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title insurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance from the entity named below. Limited Liability Company: Core Ventures, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company. a. A copy of its operating agreement, if any, and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. b. If a domestic Limited Liability Company, a copy of its Articles of Organization and all amendments thereto with the appropriate filing stamps. c. If the Limited Liability Company is member -managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member. d. A current dated certificate of good standing from the proper governmental authority of the state in which the entity was created. e. If less than all members, or managers, as appropriate, will be executing the closing documents, furnish evidence of the authority of those signing. This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA@ Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. ■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. (fIRI The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 7 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 107 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI SCHEDULE B, PART II - Exceptions (continued) The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested documentation. Affects the proposed buyer herein. 20. Lease made by SCP 2002A-11 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company to MT. Prospect CVS, L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company dated October 9, 2002, a Memorandum of Amended and Restate Lease was recorded October 30, 2002 as document no. 0021195424, demising the Land for a term of years beginning March 20, 2002 and ending January 31, 2028, and all rights thereunder of, and all acts done or suffered thereunder by, said Lessee or by any party claiming by, through, or under said Lessee. Tenant has options for up to 10 extension periods of 5 years each, as provided in the Lease. Note: Lease contains a right of first refusal during any extension period, as provided in the Lease. As affected by the Non -Disturbance and Attornment Agreement recorded October 30, 2002 as document no. 0021195425. 21. Rights of the public, the State of Illinois and the municipality in and to that part of the Land, taken and used for road purposes. Rights of the public and quasi -public utilities, if any, in said Streetsfor maintenance therein of poles, conduits, sewers and other facilities. Affects the West portion of the Land falling within Main Street, the Northerly portion falling within Kensington Road and the Northeasterly portion of the Land falling within Rand Road. 22. Dedication for public highway by William M. Pohlman, et al, as shown on the Plat of Dedication for public highway in Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, recorded November 7, 1922 as document no. 7671364. Affects that part of the Land beginning at the Northwest corner of the land, thence East on the North line of Section 34 aforesaid 73 feet; thence South 30 feet to the South line of Foundry Road; thence Southwesterly on a curved line radius 20 feet convex to the Northwest, 31.37 feet; thence South to the South line of the Land; thence West on said South line of the Land, thence North to the point of beginning. 23. Easement in favor of the Village of Mount Prospect, and its successors and assigns, to (a) install and maintain landscaping and (b) install and maintain grantee's entrance way signage for non -advertising and non -directional purposes, and the provisions relating thereto, contained in the Grant recorded as document no. 00586805. Affecting that portion of the Land described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 34, thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 02 seconds East, along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 34, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 27 seconds East, 53.00 feet to the point of beginning, thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 27 seconds East, 129.59 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 31 seconds East, 12.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 27 seconds West, 129.59 This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA@ Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. ■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. (fIRI The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 8 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 108 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI SCHEDULE B, PART II - Exceptions (continued) feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 02 seconds West, 12.00 feet to the point of beginning. 24. Ordinance No. 5102 granting a conditional use and variations for property commonly known as 1 East Rand Road, a copy of which was recorded September 11, 2000 as document no. 00700463. 25. Terms, conditions and limitations contained in the No Further Remediation Letter issued by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and recorded June 16, 2005 as document no. 0516718027. 26. All endorsement requests should be made prior to closing to allow ample time for the company to examine required documentation. This note will be waived for policy. END OF SCHEDULE B, PART II This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA@ Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. ■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. (fIRI The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 9 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 109 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS a. "Discriminatory Covenant": Any covenant, condition, restriction, or limitation that is unenforceable under applicable law because it illegally discriminates against a class of individuals based on personal characteristics such as race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, familial status, disability, national origin, or other legally protected class. b. "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge or actual notice, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records. c. "Land": The land described in Item 5 of Schedule A and improvements located on that land that by State law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond that described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in any abutting street, road, avenue, alley, lane, right-of-way, body of water, or waterway, but does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. d. "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, security deed, or other real property security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. e. "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. f. "Proposed Amount of Insurance": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Amount of Insurance of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. g. "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. h. "Public Records": The recording or filing system established under State statutes in effect at the Commitment Date under which a document must be recorded or filed to impart constructive notice of matters relating to the Title to a purchaser for value without Knowledge. The term "Public Records" does not include any other recording or filing system, including any pertaining to environmental remediation or protection, planning, permitting, zoning, licensing, building, health, public safety, or national security matters. i. "State": The state or commonwealth of the United States within whose exterior boundaries the Land is located. The term "State" also includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam. j. "Title": The estate or interest in the Land identified in Item 3 of Schedule A. 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. 3. The Company's liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: a. the Notice; b. the Commitment to Issue Policy; c. the Commitment Conditions; d. Schedule A; e. Schedule B, Part I -Requirements f. Schedule B, Part II -Exceptions; and g. a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. 4. COMPANY'S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company is not liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY a. The Company's liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company's delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured's good faith reliance to: i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company's written consent, any Schedule B, Part II -Exceptions; or iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. b. The Company is not liable under Commitment Condition 5.a. if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. c. The Company is only liable under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. d. The Company's liability does not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Condition 5.a. or the Proposed Amount of Insurance. e. The Company is not liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA@ Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. AN,■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. �'���' The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 10 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356LI Page 110 of 455 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. CCH12502356LI (continued) f. The Company is not obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. g. The Company's liability is further limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy to be issued to the Proposed Insured. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT; CHOICE OF LAW AND CHOICE OF FORUM a. Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment. b. Any claim must be based in contract under the State law of the State where the Land is located and is restricted to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Proposed Insured against the Company must be filed only in a State or federal court having jurisdiction. c. This Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. d. The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II -Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. e. Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company. f. When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company's only liability will be under the Policy. 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT IS ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company's agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company's agent for closing, settlement, escrow, or any other purpose. 8. PRO -FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro -forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro -forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro -forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. CLAIMS PROCEDURES This Commitment incorporates by reference all Conditions for making a claim in the Policy to be issued to the Proposed Insured. Commitment Condition 9 does not modify the limitations of liability in Commitment Conditions 5 and 6. 10. CLASS ACTION ALL CLAIMS AND DISPUTES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS COMMITMENT, INCLUDING ANY SERVICE OR OTHER MATTER IN CONNECTION WITH ISSUING THIS COMMITMENT, ANY BREACH OF A COMMITMENT PROVISION, OR ANY OTHER CLAIM OR DISPUTE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THE TRANSACTION GIVING RISE TO THIS COMMITMENT, MUST BE BROUGHT IN AN INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY. NO PARTY MAY SERVE AS PLAINTIFF, CLASS MEMBER, OR PARTICIPANT IN ANY CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING. ANY POLICY ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS COMMITMENT WILL CONTAIN A CLASS ACTION CONDITION. 11. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Amount of Insurance is Two Million And No/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) or less may be arbitrated at the election of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. END OF CONDITIONS 1031 EXCHANGE SERVICES If your transaction involves a tax deferred exchange, we offer this service through our 1031 division, IPX1031. As the nation's largest 1031 company, IPX1031 offers guidance and expertise. Security for Exchange funds includes segregated bank accounts and a 100 million dollar Fidelity Bond. Fidelity National Title Group also provides a 50 million dollar Performance Guaranty for each Exchange. For additional information, or to set-up an Exchange, please call Scott Nathanson at (312)223-2178 or Anna Barsky at (312)223-2169. This page is only a part of a 2021 ALTA@ Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I -Requirements; Schedule 8, Part II -Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. AN,■ Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. �'���' The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.' ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (07/01/2021) Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM Page 11 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-SPS-1-25-CCH12502356L1 Page 111 of 455 411111111111, I R Inquire before wI Wu�µ WIRE FRAUD ALERT This Notice is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. If you have any questions, please consult with a lawyer. All parties to a real estate transaction are targets for wire fraud and many have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they simply relied on the wire instructions received via email, without further verification. If funds are to be wired in conjunction with this real estate transaction, we strongly recommend verbal verification of wire instructions through a known, trusted phone number prior to sending funds. In addition, the following non-exclusive self-protection strategies are recommended to minimize exposure to possible wire fraud. • NEVER RELY on emails purporting to change wire instructions. Parties to a transaction rarely change wire instructions in the course of a transaction. • ALWAYS VERIFY wire instructions, specifically the ABA routing number and account number, by calling the party who sent the instructions to you. DO NOT use the phone number provided in the email containing the instructions, use phone numbers you have called before or can otherwise verify. Obtain the number of relevant parties to the transaction as soon as an escrow account is opened. DO NOT send an email to verify as the email address may be incorrect or the email may be intercepted by the fraudster. • USE COMPLEX EMAIL PASSWORDS that employ a combination of mixed case, numbers, and symbols. Make your passwords greater than eight (8) characters. Also, change your password often and do NOT reuse the same password for other online accounts. • USE MULTI -FACTOR AUTHENTICATION for email accounts. Your email provider or IT staff may have specific instructions on how to implement this feature. For more information on wire -fraud scams or to report an incident, please refer to the following links: Federal Bureau of Investigation: http://www. fbi. q Wire Fraud Alert Original Effective Date: 5/11/2017 Current Version Date: 5/11/2017 Internet Crime Complaint Center: http://www.ic3.gov Page 12 CCH12502356LI - WIRE0016 (DSI Rev. 12/07/17) TM and © Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and/or an affiliate. All rights reserved Page 112 of 455 FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE Effective January 1, 2025 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority -owned subsidiary companies (collectively, "FNF," "our," or "we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use, and protect personal information, when and to whom we disclose such information, and the choices you have about the use and disclosure of that information. A limited number of FNF subsidiaries have their own privacy notices. If a subsidiary has its own privacy notice, the privacy notice will be available on the subsidiary's website and this Privacy Notice does not apply. Collection of Personal Information FNF may collect the following categories of Personal Information: • contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); • demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender, marital status); • identity information (e.g., Social Security Number, driver's license, passport, or other government ID number); • financial account information (e.g., loan or bank account information); • biometric data (e.g., fingerprints, retina or iris scans, voiceprints, or other unique biological characteristics; and • other personal information necessary to provide products or services to you. We may collect Personal Information about you from: information we receive from you or your agent; information about your transactions with FNF, our affiliates, or others; and • information we receive from consumer reporting agencies and/or governmental entities, either directly from these entities or through others. Collection of Browsing Information FNF automatically collects the following types of Browsing Information when you access an FNF website, online service, or application (each an "FNF Website") from your Internet browser, computer, and/or device: • Internet Protocol (IP) address and operating system; • browser version, language, and type; • domain name system requests; and • browsing history on the FNF Website, such as date and time of your visit to the FNF Website and visits to the pages within the FNF Website. Like most websites, our servers automatically log each visitor to the FNF Website and may collect the Browsing Information described above. We use Browsing Information for system administration, troubleshooting, fraud investigation, and to improve our websites. Browsing Information generally does not reveal anything personal about you, though if you have created a user account for an FNF Website and are logged into that account, the FNF Website may be able to link certain browsing activity to your user account. Other Online Specifics Cookies. When you visit an FNF Website, a "cookie" may be sent to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. Information gathered using cookies helps us improve your user experience. For example, a cookie can help the website load properly or can customize the display page based on your browser type and user preferences. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing your Internet browser settings. Be aware that doing so may impair or limit some functionality of the FNF Website. Web Beacons. We use web beacons to determine when and how many times a page has been viewed. This information is used to improve our websites. Do Not Track. Currently our FNF Websites do not respond to "Do Not Track" features enabled through your browser. Links to Other Sites. FNF Websites may contain links to unaffiliated third -party websites. FNF is not responsible for the privacy practices or content of those websites. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of every website you visit. Privacy Statement Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM by ILD0531.doc Page 13 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-CCH12502356L1 Page 113 of 455 Use of Personal Information FNF uses Personal Information for these main purposes: • To provide products and services to you or in connection with a transaction involving you. • To improve our products and services. • To prevent and detect fraud; • To maintain the security of our systems, tools, accounts, and applications; • To verify and authenticate identities and credentials; • To communicate with you about our, our affiliates', and others' products and services, jointly or independently. • To provide reviews and testimonials about our services, with your consent. When Information Is Disclosed We may disclose your Personal Information and Browsing Information in the following circumstances: • to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure; • to affiliated or nonaffiliated service providers who provide or perform services or functions on our behalf and who agree to use the information only to provide such services or functions; • to affiliated or nonaffiliated third parties with whom we perform joint marketing, pursuant to an agreement with them to jointly market financial products or services to you; • to law enforcement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order; or • in the good -faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to comply with legal process or applicable laws, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF, its customers, or the public. The law does not require your prior authorization and does not allow you to restrict the disclosures described above. Additionally, we may disclose your information to third parties for whom you have given us authorization or consent to make such disclosure. We do not otherwise share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, and any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership, or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of the foregoing information in connection with any of the above described proceedings. Security of Your Information We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information. Choices With Your Information Whether you submit Personal Information or Browsing Information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit Personal Information or Browsing Information, FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you. State -Specific Consumer Privacy Information: For additional information about your state -specific consumer privacy rights, to make a consumer privacy request, or to appeal a previous privacy request, please follow the link Privacy Request, or email privacy((a�fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. Certain state privacy laws require that FNF disclose the categories of third parties to which FNF may disclose the Personal Information and Browsing Information listed above. Those categories are: • FNF affiliates and subsidiaries; • Non-affiliated third parties, with your consent; • Business in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets; • Service providers; • Law endorsement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order. Privacy Statement Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM by ILD0531.doc Page 14 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-CCH12502356L1 Page 114 of 455 For California Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by California law. For additional information about your California privacy rights, please visit the "California Privacy" link on our website (fnf.com/california-privacy) or call (888) 413-1748. For Nevada Residents: We are providing this notice pursuant to state law. You may be placed on our internal Do Not Call List by calling FNF Privacy at (888) 714-2710 or by contacting us via the information set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. For further information concerning Nevada's telephone solicitation law, you may contact: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, 555 E. Washington St., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101; Phone number: (702) 486-3132; email: aginguiries(a�ag.state. nv.us. For Oregon Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes, except after you have been informed by us of such sharing and had an opportunity to indicate that you do not want a disclosure made for marketing purposes. For additional information about your Oregon consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy(cD-fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710 FNF is the controller of the following businesses registered with the Secretary of State in Oregon: Chicago Title Company of Oregon, Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon, Lawyers Title of Oregon, LoanCare, Ticor, Title Company of Oregon, Western Title & Escrow Company, Chicago Title Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Liberty Title & Escrow, Novare National Settlement Service, Ticor Title Company of California, Exos Valuations, Fidelity & Guaranty Life, Insurance Agency, Fidelity National Home Warranty Company, Fidelity National Management Services, Fidelity Residential Solutions, FNF Insurance Services, FNTG National Record Centers, IPEX, Mission Servicing Residential, National Residential Nominee Services, National Safe Harbor Exchanges, National Title Insurance of New York, NationalLink Valuations, NexAce Corp., ServiceLink Auction, ServiceLink Management Company, ServiceLink Services, ServiceLink Title Company of Oregon, ServiceLink Valuation Solutions, Western Title & Escrow Company For Vermont Residents: We will not disclose information about your creditworthiness to our affiliates and will not disclose your personal information, financial information, credit report, or health information to nonaffiliated third parties to market to you, other than as permitted by Vermont law, unless you authorize us to make those disclosures. Information From Children The FNF Websites are not intended or designed to attract persons under the age of eighteen (18). We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian. International Users FNF's headquarters is located within the United States. If you reside outside the United States and choose to provide Personal Information or Browsing Information to us, please note that we may transfer that information outside of your country of residence. By providing FNF with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you consent to our collection, transfer, and use of such information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. FNF Website Services for Mortgage Loans Certain FNF companies provide services to mortgage loan servicers, including hosting websites that collect customer information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers (the "Service Websites"). The Service Websites may contain links to both this Privacy Notice and the mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice. The sections of this Privacy Notice titled When Information is Disclosed, Choices with Your Information, and Accessing and Correcting Information do not apply to the Service Websites. The mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice governs use, disclosure, and access to your Personal Information. FNF does not share Personal Information collected through the Service Websites, except as required or authorized by contract with the mortgage loan servicer or lender, or as required by law or in the good -faith belief that such disclosure is necessary: to comply with a legal process or applicable law, to enforce this Privacy Notice, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF or the public. Privacy Statement Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM by ILD0531.doc Page 15 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-CCH12502356L1 Page 115 of 455 Your Consent To This Privacy Notice; Notice Changes By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of the information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. We may change this Privacy Notice at any time. The Privacy Notice's effective date will show the last date changes were made. If you provide information to us following any change of the Privacy Notice, that signifies your assent to and acceptance of the changes to the Privacy Notice. Accessing and Correcting Information; Contact Us If you have questions or would like to correct your Personal Information, visit FNF's Privacy Request website or contact us by phone at (888) 714-2710, by email at privacy(a-fnf.com, or by mail to: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer Privacy Statement Printed: 05.21.25 @ 06:32 PM by ILD0531.doc Page 16 IL-CT-FA83-02100.231400-CCH12502356L1 Page 116 of 455 4/13/26, 8:37 AM Cook County Treasurer's Office - Chicago, Illinois TO-[ �L "T X I �N G �D I ST �R I GT �D �E BT ATT �R I �B UT �E DTO YO U �R �P �R 0 �P �E RTY Note: The above amounts are illustrations of how much government debt could be attributed to your property based on its 2024 value. See Details Here OVERVIEW - 111P�',`#A for NTS Property index Nw be (RHN).", 03-34-200-001 -0000 Property Location: 1 E RAND RD MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056-0000 Volume: 235 Incorrect Image? Click Here. 1I III `,,J IIIJEW &I I[RCH Scroll down foir iirnoire iiin-foirimation. Mailing Information: CVS PHARMACY 2799 01 ONE CVS DRIVE WOONSOCKET, RI 02895-0000 Update Your Information Tax Year 2023 (billed in 2024) rotal Amount Billed: $178,547.08 11st INSTALLMENT -Tax Year 2023 2r',�d INSTALLMENT -Tax Year 2023 Original Billed Amount: $94)210.57 Original Billed Amount: $84,336.51 Due Date: 03/01/2024 Due Date: 08/01/2024 Tax: $0.00 Tax: $0.00 Interest: $0.00 Interest: $0.00 Current Amount Due: $0.00 Current Amount Due: $0.00 rotal iii n° IIIuee. Tax Year 2024 (billed in 2025) rotal Almouint Billed: $184,935.11 https://www.cookcountytreasurer.com/yourpropertytaxoverviewresuIts.aspx Page 117 of 4d5 1 15��111111�1', I �1",4111, S'T A, L L E N'I' - 1 ­,,,,,,',��,�,, X Y a r 2 0,"14 Original Billed Amoufflm: $98,200.89, Due Date,,, 03/,04/2,025 Tax x $O.Go F n(l,"west., $O.Go Currey; Amount, Due: $0.00 Total Amount Duc., Cook County TreaSUrers Offfice - Chicago, 1111inds 2,f-"i d tl N S L L E N-11" - 11, ax Year 2024 Or, Iginal B1111W AfTwuntli: $86734.22 Due Date,,., 12/15/21025 Tax-, $0.00 lWerest: $0.00 C ur mn t� A mount, D wip, $10-11,00 1 19 Tax Year 2,025 (billed Ilia 2,026r I.28 1 at flr S TA L ii- E' T-, "If� Y, 0 2 5 Original Bfllwl( Amount: $101 f71 4.2,81, Due Dat'e. 04/01/2026 $0.00 Tax II ,rest.- $0.00 Current, Amount, Due: $10-00 Total Amount Due,& $0.00 Jwrn NTIO N �- Do ri ot do u b! e- pay t h i s, ta,X bi 11,, A I e n d e ir says; ft i nte n d,,r.,,, to pay t'. h e s eta x e s Contact your lencler toverif'y,, About" p ym, ents, Iy,,mv ems, am recorded ft date thley, a,,r, e recelved. Tfwy ap,,,pear on the site about three business days loto,'r. Open a PDF of your tax bill that can be printed and used' to pay" in person or by, ma Tax'Yer;ar20231 Second ln�statime�n,,tDueT,,,hmd�ayAugustl,,12024 Tax Year 2024 Second Irt allment Due, Mwiday, Dec, mm , 151,20 5, e bey 02, Tax Yea r 2 0,25 R r,st I nsta 14 ment Due, Wie4nes4ay, April 1 , 2026 ,Sitolp receiving your tax bill "by maill. �!/j iS 1g, n up flo r eB ill Ing to receiver futu re, ta X b H Is via erna i 1. Are There Any Overpayments on Your PIN? Ofur roeolrds do not Indicate a reftind availab]e on the PIN you'have entererr hftps-/'Iw, ww- coo, k0tintytreasuirer-com/you rpropertyta ,overviiewiesuIt ..a Page 118 of 5 Cook County TreasUrers Offfice - Chicago1111inds 2024 2023 2022 2,021 Hieowner Exemption: NO NO NO NO Sen, io r C it iz en E xem pt io n NO NO NO, NO, Senior Freeze Exe m�ptionw, NO NO NO NO Retuming Veteran Exemption: NO NO NO NO Disabled Person Exemimption: NO NOI, NO, NO Dis bn pont,, la Of a I k led Vet Examfi NO NO NO NO Tax 'Year 2025 exemptionsgranted', by theAsz;,sessorwill be refltected on your Second Installiment tax bill,". A pp, ly f or a ITI i s s ing exemption Tax Year; 200S $143,599.44 Tax'Ye a r 2 0 2A $1841935.11 Diff'erenice:, 4- $4'1;1335.67 Pereent Change.& 1+ 28.79% See your-cornplete property tax history. 4ote: The, above, amounts are,, illustrations of how much gloverInment debt, could be attributed to you r propert y based on Is 20,24 va I u e. Yo,ur TafV D Istricts Total Debts and District, Pro;j wrty Liabilities valvie hftps-Iw, ww- coo, koar ntytreasuirer-com/you rpropertyta�,overviiewiesuIt ..a EsIlmatedl Total % of Taxing Pro e ny, Va, I ue, District, Debt, Debts and Liabilities to Property Page 119 of 5 4113/26' T 81.1,37 AM Northwest MiOsquito Abatement Wheeiing; Metro Water Reclamation Distof "Chic.aqo Mt Prospv,ct Park D[strict Harper,Ga,1111,Gommi Co14eq,,',,e 512 (Pallatine) Townzhiiistrict 214 (ArIllingition Hts) Riveffraill,s Elliernientary S�D 26 (Mt Pros) Vilialge-af, Mount Prospect Town of Whie,elingi GookCiounity Forest Preserve D[strict Cou nity,of Coo III Cook.,Countyl Treasurers, Office - Chicago., Illinois $986, J'q I 111 7 $,99J462j,645,96 8 $ 21402,6 00, 0.00,24156% $24, $4,681,319,,0010, 1 $,615,52.5,3 76,003 $2,402,60,01 0.0"00''3903% $18 2 $ 3 68 61414'', 71 1,703 $7,,0,101,442 1Z $ 2,,402,61 0 "D 0.0,342''717% $12,, 6,34 $3 0,6,,3 04,3 8 8 $68,4 7 8,6 5,`7,,8 5,2 $2,402,600 0.00,350,85%, 1 1 $1011,"74"17 $ 9 %0 28,263 $34J,503,0611,344 $2,402,600, 01.00,69634% $6,8961 $3 7',,61 Ij 57 $ 2_..,0T5,,010'8,,8 2 6, $ 2,40,2,6 00, 01192152% $44,846 #" 99 $ 6,9 61,556,410, $ 2,402k 00 0.0,34,5124% $,96,"888 $281J,338 $ 2 O,J,5I 7 6J'6124,66, "7 $2,402,600, 0. 0, 116, 7 6, 4% $33 $5,48,552,253 $6,21111111117 0,611 3`16,173 J, $ 2,402fi, 001 01.00, 3832% $2,102 21,, 151,,`7 67, "74 8 $ 612 7.,,0,61, 3 "1 6,j 73 $ 2,402,,6100, 0.0,00,3832% $8,111 ,043 Dil"Istrili'let DebtAttnriibuted to Yot jx Pro peir"11..y." $273f1 4 18 6 To re,a,d "Trea s u r er P a pp a s" De bt Stud y a nd use the 'I interad''Ji've m a 13, c I i Ick here, Highlights of Y. =,Ta,kling Districts" Debt and Pension Nlmo records have been founid f'oryourTaxlng Districts!' FlnaIncia! Stat'lie mien ts anId Disciasures reports,, 'View the financial reports filed by, 5_47 local axing Districts a cr,oss Coo k County, pu III ant to the Debt, Disclos ure Ord] n a nce a ut ho red' by Tre a su re r, M aria Pa p pa s. R e a d t h e Execu five S u m rn a rly, Read the Debit Report Cook COUnty Debt Map. Correlation Char,t Between Debit and Filgher I axes Search your p,rop,erty to find out what portion of local gover nmen't debt is attributed W YOUr prop,erty' Debt to Prop�erty'Valu e by M Unicipa lity I- Residential arid Gom niercial Debt and Di sclo,S Lire Data B, rowse all financial reYrts fi led by a specific local government BEGIN A IINEW SEARCH DISCLAIMM,The information on this s„crieien carves frorn, many sourioes, few of which are in the cantraill of the OOP ,COun't,,y'TreasLirler,"S� offil'CII 'Taxpayers, are advisedto take personal responsibility for -t heir PIN, property Ict:avon,, taxpayer address, and payment am—rounts, post.eld due or paiid,, -to, be sure,,of -their accuracy. httpsJAvw w,- coo,kcountytr;e!as,urier.,comly,oui,,rprope"x,o,verv-1esullts -wipix Page 120 of 405 OMWIT U.I.Iffiall] No n AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SAL `7 A �'Ot�ay of January, 20,261, (the THISAGRE.-EMENT OFPURIC , HASE AND SALE ("AgrecineffC) is madle, as of the3o' -n Illinois Iii ilted liabl"I'll' and NATIONA1 "Effectivile Date"), by and between CORE V1 N"FURES, LLC") 411 A I I Wn i ity Company ("I'Siellier I I I'' EXPRESS WASH 11, LLC, a, Delaware limited fiablilliqr company ("Puchaser III E 'r A LI SI- C I N, Seller is the contract purchaser of ceftain. property loicatied at I E. Ranid'Rolaid, Molunt Priolispelict, 1111inoill 60,0156, n,ioirle pai-tilicularly depileted andAyr, described oil .1 Ah'ibit A, attached hiereto ��and incolivorated herein by ricfere,nice (the "Seller's pat-C,110 J)"UriStsan'tto "t, hat certu"n Purchaseand Sate Agreement dallted a,s of May, 1 161,2025, by and between Sle) lier, as purchaser, and, ��SCP, 200A I I 1 1-1 1 1 I . a , Fe LLC Delaware limited liability comp,any (",(,urrent , e Owne�rl`),, as sel[er (tlie r g ;ether, with all of Seller"'s right tit'lle, aIrl'id ,in lierest in,, and, to all ecasemilents, he,reditaments, ,B. lier, S Parcel, tog I I appurtilietiances I improvelTienisnow or h ereafter bil n.gll n 9 to sluc h property an d a] I Ii Ce 111's''e'sil perm it s, warrand es and I aran ti es re lateld ti,illerile'tilo,,�c)lo�ll,lielicit,,iv,c�ly I-e-fierreid to blelow as, thilic "Et"ller lons "B. Seller has agreedto sel I ��and PLIrchaser has,, agrelled tol purchase the Property subject to and upon the terms and licondit" ,of this Agreemetit� 'RE, .-J. ,, bir -atio, , the recelpt and adequacy of'whilich is hilereby 'NOW, "I"H[F. K)RE' f �� $1,10,0110 and ,other gill and valvablie. consi,&l 11 �aic know I edged,, Seller and Purchaser agrele as, NIOWS'N A 116 Basi'lic, Provi'1191-ons. The followiing are. certain provislili which are part ollf, and, i'l-li certain instances, relfb''rred to, insubsequent provi'sions ol"IfthisAgreement. ,(a) Brilloket-s*,- Mid-Arnerlica Real Estate Cloillploration., (b) De poisi t iltbeing expiresisly understood that � ofthe Deposit shall, ftorn and after, thic Effict-ve Date, be'ri,ol,n-'re,f"t,itilidat�)lle excepthl the event of SeUer de ivul I (C) Intienflionalty, Deleted. Inspivefiiion Pler'llod:1 thel pleriod, coli,imencing on flile 11,1 ctive Date and con"CIO'ding at 11-59, Ini. I P rl,i "lle niniety 11(910) ,days therleafter,'unless extended in accordance with Selictilloill,,,,,,116111(,bil)'belolw. Nastern Standard e,,) Intentionally Dieleted. Purcitia.se PjiCie�:� (g,) Tolte Company: Chilicagoll Title 111surance C orripany, 2441 Warrienville Road, SLTItC 10101, Lislie, IL 1 2 Aftenfillow Bethann, Bock I hune,- (71108) 227-411221 le. -Mail- bockb(j,.qo�iji, or h1file Ebbert,, Phone- (63,10), 1187 1 - 3 5414,, e -ntai 1: 610 5 31' ebiben](:c�bell t.0011111". 1 12. Sa le a n d, Clo nve yance. Oil and subject to, the tennils and conliditilions lio�f��thl'is,,Agree!men,,t,,,I Sellieragrees to sell the Pro, er P 11 ty to Purchaser and Purchaser agrees to, purchase the Property frorri Se,11crfor the Purchase Price. 3. IDI Within fivie (5) busin"i days after thiie Effective Date, Purchaser sli,all defiver the f"'),eplo'sit, tio the Title I I Company. The. Dep oisit shal] bile dilel ive'ried "to Sieller eappliled to "the Purchase P"rilice, ,or reffincled to Pu'rchaser, la's Provided be"10W. T" t I 4. C01,111ditions. Purchaiiser's o'bligat'liollri t,o put -chase thile P'll"Opicay is expressly clondlitioned upon.- (a)"PuTichaser's ttands, wiloodlands satisfactioli., in it's sole and labilso,lute disicretion, wittlil, the utilities capaiciities,, zontrig, soil bearing caixicity,' subsoil, wilo and lenvirontnental condition of ��the Propleirty and, that the Property otherwise may be used ancVor teased for Purchaser's intended use and/lor developme'nt anild PUrchaser lo'btainingaH zoning and site plla,n approvals and licienses, required), pernitts and lat Tlits fl�om the I lieclble goviernmelital allthorities with jurisdiliction over the Property for mt.milielpality in,whilich "the Propet y is, located and any other such untended use anid/olir deveiiii1l (if the'Propert"y'lll it being expressly understood that PlUrchaser shall 'be deernied In, halve satisliffed i tsellf with t 1 11 respect to such 'matters unliess Purchaser terminates, t'his Agreement on ot, blefore thile expi"ration ofthe Inspection Period, (b Purchaser-s satlisfalictilion, "'in. its sol'ie and absolt ite, diiscrietion, with the state of tifle, tio thePropetty as, describet] in, aild within the 1 5 and (c), ScIler becorning (be (�c sirriplie owne�r ofthe Property pursiluant toll thic, Underlying tini,eftatiftes, set forth, "in,,, Sect"ov, 5 bolowI, C',11ontract (cloillectiviely, the "Condiffilions"). 111083321,86.4 rl- 4n4 -9 Ar-r- Docusign Erivelope, ID"�::,13199,49Fl,�-73�40,-4��D3,8-,�9A4A-,,86,r)�29�E43��6�CEE 115. 'Ellylidence olf,ritie. ,�(a) As,, evildence of tifle to the Property, Seller shall,, ,at Seller's sole cost and expense, fitimish to PtIrchaser within I I �� III I, I the 1"itle t,en ,(101), days, aftler the U&Ictive Date ,a commitinent lorrimitmene") for an ALTA (,�),wner'isl piolicy of title 114M M'' cc IsSueld by Coryiplany (with legible copi,ii i A I underlying CloctIrnents note(l iti the Commitment (the "' Undierly"i pj,g 1:t,ltle DOICUMents 11 in an aniourlit riot less than the Purellase Price bearing �ret date later than the E�ffiectivel)ate committing "the Title Comparty, "to, irtsure Purchaser as, the &e simple owner of thle 10rio, Purchaser may obtain, rat its solle clost and expense, Ilan updated surl ofthe Property containiing such Perty I I I I", :N 64, I'l? 1011 Of infoinnation. and"I'a-bile A Itenis as Pu'rchaser rnziy reqlture (the "The Illegal description on the Survey shall. be the diesicr," ti the Property used in the Deed (as herelinafterdefitted). Purchaiser shall hilave fifteen (15), days afte'r the date on, which Purch,asier has riecei veld t I he lazst of the Cominitment., the Undierly"li-ig Title Docurnents, i tt,ie Stir,vey (,,so long as Purchaser obtainis thic Survey niol later ti lie ptions, to thilan -thirty (30) d,a,yis after the E ec IV "Datile, i th s Agreement) within which ��to niotify Seller ofianY en"OUrnbratices or exce, Which Purchaiscr objil ("Purchaiserl'i Obitecti"on Notilice"), If Puricluaser ,does not tirnely deliver Purchaser's, Ob"ecill Notice Purich,eas,er shall cloniclusitviely be dileemed to,, havileaccepted al I enetimbrancle's and exiceptions ,set, 'forth in thic (1 ommitrrile,11rand 'the Sur.vey. 11 �1 Ill. in 45 jection Notice setting Seller shall] noltify Purchaser in writing ("Selley's Nolificel [hin 111 (1, 1101) days after receivi,� 9 Purchasell, s Ob 1 1, )11 Wil 1 0 lichaser, if ,.any, Se I I er W i I I CO Mil to el", natic or ,endorse ,over to thesatilisfkti'lloin of Purchaser 'in )RIS 6 rth whilich matters objected "to, bly M IM) 1 111on ly ,sol,e,,��a"nd;ab,soilt,itic,�ildiscriet'l"on, Selliler'isfai'luret,ol��t,inielyrespi,o,ndtiol,�u,rch�iseCsO�jec�t'lon'Not�,icesh,all,bedice�med;anilelilecti b Siel lier riot -to, CAWC tlhe matters objectied to "by�, Purchaser. All excqntons not objileicted, to by Ntric[lia,ser are hicreinaftlei ref4reld to as "''Peruftitteld Exe, "Notwlll',,,tl"i,s,tat-id,)'n,g, the foregy,011111gr, at or pirior tol Closing, Seller shall. be obligated to, &('6se or- satisiif�,Iall, n1ortgages, ol,n "the Pro perty aris ing by, th rilough o r u nder Sel 11 er,' play a] I ,del I r�i q u ent 'prop,e rty taxes, and pay" or satI sfy al I other I "i en s,, i u lidgments ,or, rn o etary P11 or t claltils 0111",encurnbranicesdue to Sefler'ls-i acts or 110111iSs"lons regardliess, olf whethe'r Purchaserlobjectstio same., Ifat anytimile "I ClOsArig -xiception and th,,it was not disiclol,,sied the, PUrchalser becolmes, aware of a title defect or survey miat,tei that ,s no,t a PETMitted til"O, Com"rInitment lor SUrviley, and,while"h would otfiel'WiSe qUali"(� fbr an objection'tillotice, Purichasershal. have, the rightto o,b I jilect to the siarne # I 'I 11'� I �, i a, n - ea) I ilin't Is Sect" b dol i Vel"i 11 g ��LO 'S &11. er wr Itte, i, not'i ice (If suchad dit ional titl e defect oi survey matterand -the same proliced,tries slet,forth Y 11 , ;1 1101. 1 1 ,shall ble appililicablie to s,uch aididliti onad itents. "Pu,i,c'ha,iiser'iisO"bje,:�cti�oln',Noti,ce (b) With,res'pect toany encumbrances or exceptions which PUrcliziser Objects to HI abill not to ellmin�atic ot- endiorsile, over and'WhIch Seller clects (11or is deerned Ilt,o have elected), in the tilme period set forth "'in " Sectilion 5(a) , III !!I i Useller"I'S' otice to elthe'r, W to waive Its object, -)t o ". 10111s InSeller'lls lic'e,, Pt.irichaser shall elect, Nvithin fifteen (15) days,, follilowing reeei� N enicumbrances, and/or exceptiong shall be to anid acicept titlesubject to encumbiranell it'.),17 except'illoinis (iji, which, case SUCh, WaW, deemed ",',,'Perm.,itteci,'Ex,,cile,pti,ons); or i terminate this Agreement, wherietiplon'the Deposit shall b,e plromptl,y returned tol Puretila,ser, arldi this Agreement shall thereafter bv, of no, ffirther force or effect. I """' Markled At C111011,15incy, Seller shall causi�le "the Title Com,painy to, hiand rn�ark the Commiti-nerit (the Co,rainlitment") as an elifictive Otleirlsuriallce. Policy illlsal:triing iiiarketable dittle in, Purchaser) as the fee simple lowner thereof, In ttie ftil I arnotint of the Purchase Price as of t,he d,ate and time of Olos'ling, 11(thiereby providing so-icalled "gap Coverage), without stindard ��tlell 1 11, 111 a . .1 xicepti oris n r itrell Y exception,s,,, 1111saiNect only tio the Pen�nit d'E' 11 and with any e do slements, reasonably reqi "' db Purchaser w ill are avai L ble (it being emPressly understood that fliie availlabi lity ,of ��such endorseralents shal I not be a coind it'll on precedent "to Purchaser" si lob) jigation to close (,except those endorsements Selliff Miles ti011 CUM a title ��Or SUrviley objelet "the availablil"I'lity thereof,siliall "be a, condition 11 holsic, endorsen-Lentis, Seller pit C Cede n t to P Li,rc has er's o,b I i gat i on to ell p rov 1 dill that, al I eri dorsernen its request ad "by Pu rchaser , exce � t t' p uses, to curie a title or suiIvley objection 1, shallble, iia,t expense,,. 6, F Inispection Plerilold. Otiler than, with riespect, to Purchaser's satisfaictioll with the Commitment arid Survey,,, which shall be glavernedby the tinile frarnes, sill "forth in Slecti'llon 5 above., d1tritig the; Irl's''Pie'et[oti perilloild oil, Extended Inspecti'llo"t'i Period ,(as diefinied below), as "the case i1riay bile, Purchaser and its agents, representatill lernpiloye"OS", 001111still.twitsanid, con'tractors, (collectively, the e lier parties shall I have the right and I icenisc: "to enter uiplo,a the'Property to Makle a,. phyisilical I nspecti'llon thereolf. Purictiaser shal I �pirov idil Sell w "th, at 11 D I gat e r -ty Opipoilrtun"ty to I caiist If"' rty - e 'i ght. (4 8) hou rs' adv arwe n otice of any pi an neld or pe n di. ng sil te invest 1 g I oil si at th , P lopel and the 1, be presierlit for art sucti 'Investigations. 1)"urchaser agrees to repll any darriage tol the Prople�rty anid/orl 'ally t'141jacen't prolipertly ,owned or Y under contract to purchase by Se I Her thatwas causedbly Purchaser Pailles' inspectl lions o and to 'nidernni'll r testing.of the Property I fy arx"I arehiolders, I - I -iles hold Sellerl arid. its affiliates., employlees, directiors, partners, rnernbers, blenefillies, investiots, shiz . atIilid su"hisidiat .11, (coil liectively, the ",Seller Rielateid Parties Yhiamiless frolli anly cilairn "for Iiiabilitliells,' expensilics (including, rielailsolinabile attorneys' fees, ,I actually iticurried), darna . A 1 6, 4 1,, 1 111 ies, ges o1r, inItirlies arising, out Of or, resultingfirom tilie itis" ection or, testing io�fthie Priol I perty by the Purchascr Part" -s' Seher anid, the and rwtwithstan d "Ing anythl"ng to, thecontraiy in thisAgreement, such obligations to repaiT, indernnify and hold harttilics.� 'I t, Notwithstanding the fibiregoing., Purclitaser shall not lo r al y t,e rin inalt ion lio f th, i s ,A,g Slieller'Related Part, lies Shall survive (I losing I reen, en be respoinsi W e fori ndernn li, Fy In g Sel I er from the milere dii scovery o f any 'pre ­exi sti n1g advilei se corild ition. of the,, Property ( e rli'vi ron Imenta I or 1 1 P ft! otlherwlise'), provided that such condition was not createld (�:)r, exacerbated bly the PLI.ricillaser a lies. Purclia,ser agrieles 11(i), that pr1ioll' tio, 1, Ing entering the Property tol conduct any M.SpeCl1qtion lor investigatilintlill, Purchaser shall liver to Seller, a certlifleate Iolif insuratice ev�iidenc`i ith a combined, slin le firnit of Coryl rehenslive general, liability ins'uranC1(' , GOViCr4agiC, ITIC1111dillIg contractual liability, w-1 g pier occurrenice arid exceiiss umbillielia cloverage for, plersional, 111"Aitil or propielty dalmage llo�fj, 108,3321,8116A r%_ 4 nn -9 A r- r- Docusigri Envelople 10,: ��Blg,94��9Fl,,-73�40,-4D3,8�-9�A4,,A-��8�65�29E��4,36CEE, whichinsurance shall provide coverajT, �fbr, ar)yactivity,,, accident or, damage ariising in connection with i P'Ll"rchaser Pa,rtlies on. the Property,, ��anc�l (111)l to, k�eep the Propetly firee fi-orn all liliens i ertcurnl)rances, Seller shiall reasionably coo,perate with Ptirchaser in its I ill gience b"ut shall not bile ablilgati d tilo ineur, an ity, or expense In corinieC, Y liliabil'il" flion therew"th. (bl) Seller agrees, t1liat "'In the event Purchaser diete ["IT) i IICS (such determitiation ti(�) IV made in Purichaser'll,s disicretion'), at any ploint during the Inispection Period or, Extended, as, the lease may be, that the Property 'Ills, not suitable wing wn I o thile f6r ilits purposes, Rurchase,r shall have the, right to, iterminate this Agreement by gi i tten notice thereof to,, Se!lle, prillor t I b I expiration ��of the Inspection Pler1old or Extended Inspection Pedod as t lie case! may bile. If Purchasili ich not'ic,e olfternlitiation, "gives S1 within the Inspection Period or Extended Inispectillort Period,, as the casile.may'be,,, thisAgreemielin't shall tion-ninate and the,,Diii"be di sttihutied a s, fi)] I olws: (i) 'I f t he tierm i nati ,on is o n o r befoire the expi rl on of "the i n i ti al ni nety (9111011), ,day, In sp e�ct lon Pej,"i o d, I " the all be rined, to Pu,rchaser4 or ilf the Deposit ,shall be Paid I Seller alti the remia''inderi of the Deposit (bleing���l 1 1 4, 11 11 1 be plaid �� 110 tern�iinat�,�'10111 ts, On or beffire the expiratio'li ��of the Extended frispeliction Period (diefineld bellow), $50,0101101.001 ofthe Depillosit shal t Se I ler and the renmindier iie Deposit (`bein,���� shall be returned to Purchaser, and rielther paity hereto, shall h,a, vie any further rights, obligations or liabilities herieunder e,x,cept to, the extent that any right, obligatilion or habiJity set foirt-h hereM expressly survivies P I C lier a, notice of teriTiinatilion priorl to the expirat"'ion of the 'inspection,, Pe-,ri,od temiination of this Agreement. ff urchasier fails, to giveS 11 or Extiendied Inspectiori Period, as the cast may ble, the Depoisit'shall 'becorne non-relfunda,ble 1"In fivoir oF.Sellierilexclept asiothierw]'SC, I 'pr,llovidlielidii��ithis,A,,gre,ement,,��and'.Pili,rc'ha,,q,er��shalli'li��o[ollin,,gelI H ave any right "to ternlitiate this Agreemient mider ��this Secdoll�li 6. The, ffiregloiing I I - 11 1 ­E - tenill ��the Ins, liction Period. for onle (11) period oit's"iXty (60), days (the `*.I 11l notwi h,, tanildin I ,g, Purchaser shall havie the right -to extend "pe �ilil Wen not"'Ce tial seller on ��or befbtv t1w expi"ratilloi-i of -the Inspection Period, Inspection Perfold ) bly Wri, I ,) I During the Insi 111cliction I eriod and Fixtended Inspection Period, 111F ap lie,, ble Purchaser shall, , ijrsue all P P 1 a, P ,ts HIGIC11sin n i rig var i ances an apipt haser's, III and/or developralient (Yr the'Property as an permi & zo anid/or site p oval neces,sary "for Pill reasonably acceptable tol Pureha,zser and, t.sing a, de&ign, th,at matedally oonformsto ex"press tunnel icar wash, on "terms and conditions purichaser"s standard layotitand design (collielictively the "A]2l2t*0VRlSl Seiler shall reaso,nably cooperate with Pul�rcftalser ��s e,fforts tic) o I n t le Approv I s i nzludi rIig,, 'wi th out I i mi tatio n, S, Her corn p lying with, the term s o f Se�et' o n ��9 be I ow. , i h a 0 7. Exist 11 111 Matet-ials,; EjultrY (a) Within three (3) billusinesisdays of thie Eff�ctive Datie, ��an,d "to the extent, not pireviotisly delivered, '111,S' el "tiler shall in Seller"z%, POSSes,slon, "or prolvide "to Purchaser copies of all approp,riate documents and othet, in,f"Orniation. pertaininill to the Property controll (or readi "Illy ascertainable i Seller),, which colplilies s"hall 'be triile!, acaurale and compitiete, in all triatierial respilects (Purichaser acknowledging that Seller disclaii'ms any reprelsentation i warrantly as "tio the accuracy ofthe i''riforniatilan containedthiericin With respilect III any third party prepared, reports or inf6rTuatio,n), inicluding, but riolt limitield U-11), pla'ns, and specificationis, site plans, en1glineering, rep"Oftsi, Soil I in reports, weitland repo,i'lltls, other envil"01IR111011-tal audits or replorl existing title work," eas'letnients, contralicts, appirolvals (inicludI & but not P limited to,, environmental, zlwnin,g, siteplian, ,platting,,, and other apillpirolvalls), and on any pending orthricatened lifiligation at or 1, 111"). " III 1� �ail ��to consurnm�atie the trealnsact,it:�),n, �Iffecting the Property (collectively, "Exisfing LUter"alls, In "the event that Seller, and Purchaser C I r i I contemplated hereby,., [lurchaser shallreturn to Sellier all 0101PICSOf"the Existing Materials, togiethe with copilits ofainy and a' I documents, matenlals an( itilkIr ation reliatin �ction herewith (without charge to Sellier). 1, M I g to, the Property otherwisle acquired by Purchaserin connie a 'XIsting W1 t ,In the event, of Closing, lllurc,hasier sheall have the right to keep 11oftheE i i )-Niatefials. ��subje�c,t to the, pri silions, of Section 6(q) la'bovile and any litnitzations Imposed (b) From and after the 11E.0ecti "ve Date, by ffie Underlying Contract, if any, Purchalser �and its reprosen'tativies ,shall havic "the right and license to, enter ilipoin the Pror)e.:rty to Litidertake suich aictivitiels, therieloti reasoiniabl" Y requiried to, enablie Purchaser to, inve'stigatile the con,cli"ti'llon of the ,Property and otherwi[se to 1 pect to any I ia b i I ity,11 satisfy illitsellf,wilth respect to the Conliditions, Purchaser here"by indenitilifiles and, holds, Siliellei hiartTifless, with resil a 1,11jury or property datnage,, res 1 1, 1, 1111 Upon. lricltiding.,, but not limited I pe.,risoin I ulfing fillom Ptirchaser's activit" the Property in clonniecitioll I ge 'S with the f4re i light Of ,entry",,,, exic�,,pt f I ,or suich liability resulting from, the negi igence of Seller�,, its employees a rit and i Ing r I I I I � I -f this Agreieil'ien'� no-twithstand [rig, at,iything repi,resentativies. The �fo. regoling Sentence ,shall survive ��the Closing or thile earfier terrninatiori o I NI herein containeld to,, the colitrary., (a) Seller warrailits,11 replil,tsellits and covenants, to PUrchaser, as of the Ef*ctive D,ate and ,as olifthe date, ofC10,S"Ing'. as fbik"')ws. 11 there. arie nilo actions, Clamis, cause of act'i oni.1s, demands, daniages ,or actlionis of"third parties,, actual or thrileatenied, ine I I ud i n,g condernnation affbeting Sieller or, to Seller'zs- knowliedge, the Proplerty with the lie,xclep�"t'l��o'ti"ti"ia't RL'irchaser, acluiowledps that Seller ha-s a riecel viled notice ol f a th reatiened leiiii nent diol'yi ai 11 pl-oliceed i IT W11 ich shal I wi dien. "the ri, ght - of -way fo r each of E . Rand Road a nd "N . M in sti'lelet and will thereforeaffect "the, Property� ll('2), Seller hasnot entered into �any, ;and to Seller'"s krilikowliedge there, tire no outstanding ioln Ior occupanicy by Purchaser at Closing colritractls,, agreem ents,, Icasies or rental agree rnents, oral or wriften, which would prieven't, possess", Y urchaser's, obfigation'to close that at (I losii, g, the Property ofall, or an 1 1 part of the Property, and, it 1111shall be, a condittion precedent to P I I I sh�gallbe dell"Veried. to Purchaser free and clicar o17 any tenanicy"h, (3), Ifforn and after the Effective Date, Seller shall lin�o,t, loonveyl, burdien or i I enicurrIber the Property in any" rinanne'r except as contemplated herein,; 11(4 to Seller's knowledge, thic Property is nill silli Y ject 'to an elflienti With respiciatio, any "Flazarldous Materi,als ,(for inviesfigafion,,, ad mi nit strat five order, clonsien't order or ia�iyrcemenit�, litigation or, settl 111011933218,614 rl- 4 nn -9 A J= Docusign Envelope 1D: B19949F1-7349-4D38-9A4A-86529E436CEE purposes hereof, the term "Hazardous Materials" shall mean petroleum and/or petroleum derived products, hazardous materials and/or toxic substances); (5) neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation by Seller of the transaction contemplated hereby will (a) conflict with or result in a breach of or default under any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any note, bond, mortgage, indenture, license, agreement or other instrument or obligation to which Seller is a party or by which it is bound, or (b) violate any order, injunction decree, statute, rule or regulation applicable to Seller; (6) Seller is not a "foreign person" as that terra is defined in Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any applicable regulations promulgated thereunder; (7) this Agreement is, and all other closing documents to be executed and delivered by Seller will be on the date of Closing, valid and binding obligations of Seller; (8) Seller has not received any written notice of alleged violation of any law or legal requirements from any governmental authority or other third party with respect to the Property; (9) Seller has not entered into any agreements with or in favor of any governmental authority, and to Seller's knowledge, no conditions have been imposed by any governmental authority (other than compliance with laws of general application) in connection with the development of the Property and its compliance with legal requirements, (10) to Seller's knowledge, the Underlying Contract is a valid, binding and enforceable agreement between Seller and the Current Fee Owner, and (11) upon consummation of the Underlying Contract, Seller shall have full authority to convey the Property to Purchaser as provided in this Agreement. Each and every warranty, representation and covenant set forth above or otherwise set forth elsewhere in this Agreement shall be true as of the Effective Date and as of the Closing date and shall survive the Closing of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement for a period of six (6) months. If Purchaser determines that any of the representations, covenants and warranties contained in this Agreement are untrue Purchaser shall promptly notify Seller of the representation, covenant or warranty which Purchaser believes is untrue. Seller shall have ten (10) days after receipt of such notification to cure Purchaser's objection. If Seller fails to cure same within said ten (10) day period, Purchaser shall, within five (5) days after the expiration of the ten (10) day period, elect either to terminate the Agreement or proceed to close as if such representation, covenant and warranty remained true. If any of the representations, covenants and warranties contained in this Agreement shall be untrue as of the Closing date, Purchaser's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to notify Seller of such untruth and to elect to terminate the Agreement, whereupon the Deposit shall be refunded to Purchaser and the parties hereto shall be relieved of all obligations hereunder except as otherwise expressly provided herein. For the purposes of this Agreement, the phrase "to Seller's knowledge", "to Seller's actual knowledge", or phrases of similar import are used herein, shall mean the current, actual present and conscious awareness or knowledge only, without any duty of inquiry or independent investigation, of Adam Firsel; provided that so qualifying Seller's knowledge shall in no event give rise to any personal liability on the part of such named individual, or any other manager, member, officer or employee or representative of Seiler, on account of any breach of any representation or warranty made by Seller herein. (b) The parties acknowledge and agree that Seller does not currently own the Property, but is a party to the Underlying Contract with the Current Fee Owner for the purpose of acquiring the Property. It is understood and agreed that Seller's obligation to sell the Property, and Purchaser's obligation to purchase the Property, is each conditioned upon Seller's acquisition of the Property pursuant to the Underlying Contract. This Agreement is subordinate to the Underlying Contract until the consummation of the closing. In the event of a termination of the Underlying Contract, this Agreement shall automatically terminate, whereupon the Title Company will promptly return the Deposit to Purchaser, and neither party shall have any further rights, obligations or liabilities with respect to each other hereunder, except for the rights, obligations or liabilities specifically provided for under this Agreement that survive termination of this Agreement. In the event Seiler shall default in its obligations under the Underlying Contract, unless Seller's default under the Underlying Contract is due to a default by Purchaser hereunder, such default shall result in a default under the terms of this Agreement, whereupon Purchaser shall be entitled to the remedies provided in Section 1below. (c) EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT AND IN THE DOCUMENTS DELIVERED TO PURCHASER AT CLOSING, PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT UPON CLOSING SELLER SHALL SELL AND CONVEY TO PURCHASER AND PURCHASER SHALL ACCEPT THE PROPERTY "AS IS, WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS", EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT EXPRESSLY PROVIDED OTHERWISE IN THIS AGREEMENT. 9. Approvals Cooperation. In connection with the Approvals, Seller agrees that it shall hereafter: (a) sign any instruments required for the Approvals; (b) to the extent necessary, furnish evidence of ownership of the Property; (c) appear at Approvals hearings, as necessary; (d) not hinder or object to the Approvals; and (e) shall otherwise fully cooperate and assist the other in obtaining any Approvals; provided however, that (i) that such rights and capacities shall not create any encumbrances upon the Property or obligations upon Seller or the Current Fee Owner that cannot be undone in the event a Closing does not occur and (ii) all expenses with respect to the Approvals shall be paid by the Purchaser. 10. Closing. (a) The closing of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement (" Clos, ") shall occur, if at all, in escrow through the Title Company within fifteen (15) days after the expiration of the Inspection Period or Extended Inspection Period, as the case may be, or at such earlier or later date as Purchaser and Seller may agree to in writing, provided that all other conditions to Closing have been satisfied or waived. (b) At Closing, Seller and/or Purchaser shall execute and deliver to one another, as applicable, the following: 108332186.4 Docusign Envelope ID: B19949FI--7340-4D38-9A4A-86529E436CEE (i) Seller shall execute and deliver to Purchaser an affidavit stating whether or not Seller is a foreign person or nonresident alien for purposes of Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code. (ii) Seller shall execute and deliver to Purchaser (or the party designated therefor by Purchaser) a special warranty deed conveying good and indefeasible fee simple title to the Property to Purchaser (or the party designated therefor by Purchaser) subject only to the Permitted Exceptions (the "Deed"). (iii) Seller and Purchaser shall mutually execute and deliver to one another a closing statement setting forth all adjustments and prorations required by or among Purchaser and Seller under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the following: 1. Real estate and personal property taxes and assessments will be prorated between Purchaser and Seller for the period for which such taxes are assessed, regardless of when payable. If the current tax bill is not available at Closing, then the proration shall be made on the basis of 110% of the most recent ascertainable tax assessment and tax rate. Any taxes paid at or prior to Closing shall be prorated based upon the amounts actually paid. If taxes and assessments for the fiscal year in which Closing occurs or any prior years have not been paid before Closing, Purchaser shall be credited by Seller at the time of Closing with an amount equal to that portion of such taxes and assessments which are ratably attributable to the period before the date of Closing and Purchaser shall pay (or cause to be paid) the taxes and assessments prior to their becoming delinquent. If taxes and assessments for the fiscal year in which Closing occurs have been paid before Closing (or are paid at Closing with proceeds from the Purchase Price), Seller shall be credited by Purchaser at the time of Closing with an amount equal to that portion of such taxes and assessments which are ratably attributable to the period from and after the date of Closing. 2. Seller shall receive a credit at Closing for any prepaid utilities or deposit(s) made in connection therewith to the extent transferred to Purchaser at Closing. 3. The Deposit shall be applied as a credit against the Purchase Price. 4. Recording fees attributable to the Deed, any endorsements to the owner's title insurance policy (except those provided by Seller pursuant to Section 5 above) and the deletion of the standard survey exception and the Survey shall be paid by Purchaser. 5. Seller shall pay all title insurance premiums (including curative endorsements obtained by Seller pursuant to Section 5 above), state and county transfer taxes and all recording fees attributable to the discharge of title encumbrances and/or exceptions. Purchaser shall pay any municipal transfer tax. Each party shall be responsible for the fees of its own attorneys, and for any other costs incurred by such party in connection with Closing. Seller and Purchaser shall each pay for one --half (1 /2) of any closing charges and/or escrow fees; provided, however, that Purchaser shall pay for any money lender's escrow fee. Seller and Purchaser agree that the closing statement shall also provide for all other customary closing adjustments. (iv) Intentionally deleted. (v) Seller shall execute and deliver to the Title Company a so --called "no -lien" or "owner's" affidavit in form and substance satisfactory to the Title Company in order to induce the Title Company to issue an owner's policy of title insurance without standard exceptions. (vi) An Illinois Real Estate Transfer Declaration and Cook County Real Estate Transfer Declaration, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Purchaser, and submitted electronically via mytax.illinois.gov/MyDec. (vii) Any transfer Declaration or the like required by the Village of Mount Prospect. (viii) Seller shall deliver exclusive possession of the Property to Purchaser, free and clear of any tenancy. (ix) Seller and Purchaser shall execute such other documents as the Title Company or other party may reasonably request. 11. Purchaser's Conditions to Closin . Purchaser's obligation to close the transaction contemplated by this Agreement is subject to and conditioned upon (i) Seller not being in default under the Agreement; (H) all of Seller's representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all materials respects; (iii) delivery by Seller of all documents required to be delivered by this Agreement, including but not limited to all deliveries required by Section above; (iv) Title Company being prepared to issue the Marked Commitment; (v) Purchaser obtaining the Approvals to its satisfaction prior to the expiration of the 108332186.4 Docusign Envelope ID: B19949F1-7340-4D38-9A4A-86529E436CEE Inspection Period; and (vi) Seller becoming the fee owner of the Property pursuant to the Underlying Contract. If any of the foregoing conditions precedent has not been satisfied on or before Closing and Purchaser chooses not to waive same, Purchaser shall provide written notice of the failure of such condition(s) to Seller and Title Company whereupon this Agreement shall terminate, the Deposit shall promptly be refunded to Purchaser (except in the event of (v) above, whereupon, Seller shall retain $25,000,00 of the Deposit with the remainder being refunded to Purchaser, and Seller and Purchaser will have no further liability to one another under this Agreement except as expressly set forth herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the failure of such condition(s) also constitutes a default by Seller, Purchaser may exercise its rights as provided in Section_ 1(b} below. 12. Default. (a) If Purchaser shall default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, and such default shall continue for a period of ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of default from Seller to Purchaser, then provided Seller is not then in default under this Agreement, Seller shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of termination to Purchaser, whereupon the Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as liquidated damages as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy on account of such default, and neither party shall thereafter have any further liability or obligation to the other. This Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. (b) If Seller shall default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, and such default shall continue for a period of ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of default from Purchaser to Seller, then provided Purchaser is not then in default under this Agreement, Purchaser shall be entitled either: (i) to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of termination to Seller, whereupon the Deposit shall be promptly returned to Purchaser, and Purchaser shall receive a reimbursement from Seller for all of Purchaser's actual and reasonable due diligence expenses incurred with respect to the Property in an amount not to exceed Twenty Five Thousand and 00/1.00 Dollars ($25,000.00), or (ii) to seek an action for specific performance. This Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 13. Assignability. Purchaser shall have the right to freely assign its interest hereunder to an Affiliate or a Leaseback Partner. As used herein, (a) the term "Affiliate" means any person or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such entity; and (b) the term "Leaseback Partner" means any person or entity that intends to lease the Property to Purchaser, or an Affiliate or Purchaser, immediately after the consummation of the transaction contemplated in this Agreement. Purchaser shall provide written notice of such assignment to Seller at least five (5) days prior to the Closing. No assignment shall relieve Purchaser from any liability for the performance of Purchaser's duties and obligations under this Agreement, unless Seller agrees in writing to release Purchaser from such duties and obligations. 14. Miscellaneous. This Agreement cannot be modified except by written instrument signed by both of the parties hereto. Section headings set forth herein are for convenience of reference and shall not be construed to interpret, limit or otherwise define the terms and conditions of this Agreement. For so long as this Agreement remains in force and effect, Seller shall not actively market, sell or encumber the Property in any manner, and shall not accept, negotiate or entertain any other offers (including an option to purchase) for the Property. This Agreement sets forth fully and completely the agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter described herein and this Agreement shall be deemed to supersede any and all prior written or oral agreements relating to the subject matter described herein. Purchaser reserves the right, at its sole option, at any time, to waive any of the Conditions. Any such waiver shall only be effective if it is in writing and duly executed by Purchaser. Notices hereunder shall be given to the parties hereto at the addresses below their signatures and shall be deemed effective upon personal delivery, upon posting if given via United States certified mail return receipt requested, via nationally recognized overnight delivery service or by electronic mail. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Seller, Purchaser, and their respective heirs, representatives, successors, successors -in --interest and permitted assigns. Time is ofthe essence in the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If any date set forth in this Agreement should fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, compliance with any obligation or delivery due on that date will be deemed acceptable on the next business day following such Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois. 15. Brokers. Seller and Purchaser each represent and covenant to the other that they have not utilized the services of any broker or finder in connection with the transaction contemplated herein other than Broker who shall be paid by Seller. Purchaser shall defend, indemnify and hold Seller harmless from any liability for brolerage commissions, finders' fees or the like arising in connection with the sale of the Property which may be claimed by any party alleging to have been retained or utilized by Purchaser. Seller shall defend, indemnify and hold Purchaser harmless from all liability for brokerage commissions, finders' fees or the like arising in connection with the sale of the Property which may be claimed by any party alleging to have been retained or utilized by Seller including all commissions paid to Broker. 16. Casualty and Condemnation. In the event that following the Effective Date the Property shall suffer a casualty or shall be subject to a taking by eminent domain, condemnation or otherwise, Purchaser may at its sole option either: (a) terminate this Agreement, in which event Purchaser shall be entitled to the immediate refund of the Deposit and the parties hereto shall be relieved of all obligations hereunder or (b) elect to proceed to Closing in which event Purchaser shall be entitled to an assignment of insurance 108332186.4 n _. 4nc+ 9 Ar_r_ Docusign Envelope 1D: B19949Fl..7340-4D38-9A4A-86529E436CEE proceeds (and a credit at Closing for any deductible) or to participate in any such condemnation or eminent domain proceeding and to receive all of the proceeds attributable to any portion of the Property so taken. In the event that Purchaser elects to proceed to Closing, the Purchase Price hereunder shall not be adjusted. Seller and Purchaser each agree to forward promptly to the other any notice of intent received pertaining to a taking of all or a portion of the Property. 17. Force Maieure. As used in this Agreement, the term "Force Majeure" shall mean an act of God, natural disaster, epidemic, pandemic, terrorist activity, war, labor dispute, governmental order, governmental delay, or other matter beyond the reasonable control of such party, without such party's fault or negligence (specifically excluding financial inability). If the performance by either party of any of its obligations under this Agreement, including but not limited to Closing, is delayed by Force Maj eure, then the party affected shall notify the other party in writing of the specific obligation delayed, and the duration of the delay, and the deadline for completion of such obligation shall be extended by a like number of days. Except with respect to Closing which may be delayed due to a Force Majeure event, the foregoing shall not apply to any obligation to pay money due hereunder. [Signature Page Follows] 108332186.4 1� 11, 1 MINIMUM M I IFICE 1 111 � IN Ip 111111 11 : IN WfFNESS WFIERC�'XO F�!� the paitilic-is, have exiecuted this Agrec lent,. VaMf NATIONAL U'lexp"RI j�,(SkS.l WAzSH U,,, LLIC) Delaware 1161111ted liability oiompzany Signed Iby,' I I PAV4 By - Name: Da,vilid Yassky its, Aut1torized si griatury Mdress: 27531 'NW 871 Avienue I Doral, R., 3 3 '11, 7 2 1 Attentim:'David Yassky With a copy toll- Polsibict Hi PC 1,501, N. Rivei!side, I?It.a,, Suite 300,10 chilica gil Iflincils 601606 1 '111, 'r scl, Attentw Da ic)vid N. TannE er, sq. &KY elly M. CIII Eil Tielephone: .1 awwow C11 V I'll RES, LLC� OR , CAN".1 N I U 1 1 ity, camprany an Illinois finii'll id liabil" BY: Adam Firsel, Manager Address: 1110, Parkwi4aly "'N"liort,h,','Boul,,rid,,, S1.1ite 1-20 Deerfield, U, 1161100115 "re in E 1, -rnai . ciol ly ito - Law Offices of Alai 1). Pearlman,,, L.1-011C Wlth a P 17114 River Birch W,ay L.ibertyvillc, 1111ijilloilk; 601048 Attent " ilon: A,tu, Dqu , PiIM, an, Esq, Tclepflionek,����� Email - Exhibit List: Exhilibit All.- Diepicti,on off"I"ropefty s 11 [grnatUre, Page — A grel( � file nit, q/Tultrhase, an�d SaIle 108332186A rl - - - 4 n C) - 9 A r-' r-' Docusign Envelope ID: B19949FI-7349-4D38-9A4A-86529E436CEE EXHIBIT A Leguai Description of Property The North 361.6 feet of that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying west of center line of Rand Road, in Cook County, Illinois. Exhibit A 108332186.4 Detailed Business Narrative The proposed development introduces a modern 140-foot automated car wash facility designed to provide efficient vehicle processing while expanding customer service options on site. The primary wash tunnel is engineered for high -throughput exterior cleaning and is supported by high efficiency blow dryers within the tunnel exit, drying vehicles prior to exiting the wash, removing the need for a post wash drying lane. This operational configuration reduces on -site queuing, improves circulation efficiency, and enhances the overall customer experience. The facility layout builds on a standard express car wash design by adding a fully enclosed vacuum building allowing customers the option for self -detailing services in a climate -controlled building. Customers still have the option to use outdoor vacuums should they choose. The proposed car wash facility has been thoughtfully designed to balance operational efficiency, customer convenience, and responsible site engineering. The combination of self- service vacuum stalls, post wash dryers, and two-way circulation supports safe and orderly circulation throughout the site. The planned utility improvements and stormwater infrastructure ensure compliance with all applicable municipal standards while minimizing environmental impacts. Overall, the project will provide a well -organized, high -quality service amenity for the community. Hours of operation will be from 7am-8pm Monday through Sunday. Peak hours on weekdays are 8am-10am and 4pm-7pm. Peak hours on weekends are 11-3pm. There will be 4 employees on site during peak times stationed at key positions: • POS area assisting customers should any issues arise • Entrance to the tunnel leading vehicles onto the conveyor • Vacuum areas to keep the area tidy and to assist customers if needed • 1 employee circulating the site ensure everything is running smoothly Page 130 of 455 STONEFIELD April 14, 2026 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: Conditional Use Narrative Proposed Car Wash East Randall Road Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois Concept Review Case #: PZR25-000021 To whom it may concern: The proposed redevelopment of the subject property within the Community Shopping District is designed to meet all applicable standards for conditional use approval. The following narrative addresses each required criterion: I. Protection of Public Health, Safety, and Welfare The proposed automated car wash facility will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare. The facility utilizes modern, fully automated equipment designed for safe and efficient operation. On -site circulation has been carefully planned to separate vehicle movements and minimize conflict points. Environmental stewardship is a key component of the project. The development includes underground stormwater management and an advanced water reclamation system consisting of a three -stage settling process, oil -water separation, and reverse osmosis treatment. These systems will minimize environmental impacts and ensure responsible water usage and discharge practices. 2. Compatibility with Surrounding Properties The proposed use is compatible with surrounding land uses. The site is bordered by commercial uses to the south and along the roadways to the east and north, while single-family residential properties are located to the west. To provide appropriate buffering, the project includes significant landscaping and fencing along East Rand Road, Kensington Road, and IL Route 83. In addition, all vacuum -producing equipment will be equipped with silencers and enclosed within a masonry structure, substantially reducing noise impacts. These measures ensure that the use will not be injurious to nearby properties or diminish property values. 3. No Impediment to Surrounding Development The proposed redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding properties. The use is consistent with the commercial character of the corridor and represents a reinvestment in an existing site. The project enhances the overall aesthetic and functional quality of the area while maintaining compatibility with adjacent uses. 4. Adequate Public Utilities and Infrastructure The site will be served by adequate public utilities and infrastructure. All necessary services, including water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater systems, will be provided in accordance with Village standards. With the proposed equipment we are able to reclaim roughly 90% of the water used from wash to wash, significantly reducing the strain on public utilities while the inclusion of an underground stormwater management system ensures that runoff is effectively managed on -site, reducing impacts to surrounding properties and public systems. STONEFIELDENGAM 555 S OLD WOODWARD AVE, SUITE 12L, BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009 248.247.1115 T. 201.340.4472 F. Page 131 of 455 STONEFIELD Municipal Response Letter Proposed Car Wash Mount Prospect, Illinois April 10, 2026 S. Safe Access and Traffic Circulation The proposed development provides safe and efficient access while minimizing traffic congestion. The project maintains the general location of existing driveways along IL Route 83 and East Rand Road, preserving established traffic patterns and access points. A traffic study has been completed and concludes that the traffic generated by the proposed car wash can be accommodated by the surrounding roadway network. Internally, the site is designed with a circulation system that supports smooth vehicle flow between the wash tunnel, vacuum stations, and exits. The efficient tunnel design, including integrated drying systems, reduces vehicle dwell time and prevents excessive queuing. 6. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed redevelopment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Village's Comprehensive Plan. Located within the future Corridor Commercial District, the project supports the continued viability of commercial corridors by introducing a modern, well -designed service use. As a primary use of the proposed district is all auto oriented uses we believe we match the intent of this future district perfectly. The development represents a reinvestment in an underutilized property, as well as providing appropriate screening, best stormwater management practices, and site sustainability among many other key characteristics outlined in the Comprehensive Plan that we fulfill. 7. Compliance with Applicable Regulations The proposed development will comply with all applicable regulations of the Community Shopping District. The site design reflects adherence to standards related to access, circulation, utilities, and operational performance. Recommendations from the Village have been taken into consideration when developing the site plan and any minor adjustments will continue to be made in coordination with Village staff and in accordance with Planning & Zoning Commission recommendations. Should you have any questions regarding the submission items or responses above please do not hesitate to contact our office. Regards, Mitchell Harvey, PE Stonefield Engineering and Design, LLC Vincenzo Finazzo Stonefield Engineering and Design, LLC V:\DET\2025\DET-250217 Alrig & El Car Wash - I E Rand Road, Mount Prospect, IL\Correspondence\Outgoing\Municipal\2026-02-06_Municipal Response Letter.docx PAGE 12 Page 132 of 455 1 I � LEGAL !I fW E Tta M" ff ok� ur ..mvo V4 arm; h _ - - _ ALTANSPS LAND w _- K " - r y � AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY z� PA `fir _ . e lee gm 'Wfcul InaLsetuy s - KROAD_ - (A&W x z*DAM MAPa S"FOB _ T Oe - a f! _ _ wr Emma _ - - - r . '_ . r _ _ _ NOTES zFM §FN m %� - -emu m_ � � a e! � � LD ..m MM� INS,:. �. a -` -- - = ._ - f Ft IMP C g it _ u M _ -.- - - - - i- -': 3 _ q €s a� E -t r - :. !F 5 t r: Fqp - F O - ' a zw % ma w � F �_ _ 141 €_a g - _ - r_ �� R ,.. _v mtsaftxw� - x M PPMABOWE la" *--4 %& _ mm s_0 r - %mom- *00 "=--.. - � . ff�P-Mkt L r.r �- __ .F _ '- -' m "-� 19me .=fir - -- --mwt 7&-r-136c FWDPOM =- &iNP4 7—.. _ _ MJ .- { - ice. S.% 'NK-z Acm-MM iv _ � :. - g I L` m"n Aw �as ewT Q maw sow% �f " - F LrT]LIT=) CONTACTS ga� - rAs r r —�gg 3 mm mmn - m twv"nmim � ��:e _. � - ,����.� C�-M-apt LINE _`_ - _ r aft .: y B y 09 T E _ �- - e � _.. 04 �� _ a UM mff4w&�;m __ a t t�=3--:WW, � _ � z W I � - ft F� .Z Page 133 of 455 Page 134 of 455 ALTA SPS LAND TITLE NN f a _ $. <_ e s LE [ -mow L— A 'L.3 64 w--Am, bEA-" m Tr - T W rf - rr4 n ._ T = TOTE a LLTr{ vE rM - r 3LVTM vTrRFIM PM - + ___• . MGM -' - ARG-LOT m .- -. _ _ T m __ _ - FLOA TUi C - EAW Amr &Mws wwww mum 21AME LDWM .. _ _ — . ESL - rR ME - U-TLffr ch -wE Ilf TAIL —F_ -: Llic m - .: ei i PALL- _.OLANX W7Jr-i Ljkm2dwr P -hfWlW3Oar API viur r 71 irr —�— - Am —C— n'r.. . LFE -#MTW BDE, � �.rTifi . _ e � .E r— } W3 - IaTEMM * &Amgm rW— RMR aFM ubM T . in TWM RRAL mmur + MT —T .G Wloftwl "Wen" = - - - TA - s i ; {tea �•R. ?.., ..t � _ � � �TIC-��' _�`{[ice.. 1 - - ••, _ �_- _ up, ke z' k? r �s g ---� W - �....: a —je Sri es - p t E€ s 1 LIB __.— LL Page 135 of 455 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTH 361.6 FEET OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE I I EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING WEST OF THE CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD, IN COOK COUNTY, I LLI NOIS. Page 136 of 455 .......... Ilk lb 44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ---- 'Ni. . . . ...... i 1- . . ........ \­­-, If ....... . . A41 SITE ....... ..... _-J, ji I r A sit I i Christian 4`7 L -e, uroll OF . ............... \\\­_­�­_­\\_\\ . ... .... . SOURCE: USGS ONLINE MAPS LOCATION MAP SCALE: I " = 2000'± j4- tv __. o� __- _'. Ow OH OH ___--- �H 0 o" OH ____-- OH/ OH---7� uj (�� --------- (�� -------- OH-------- OH-------- (�N ------ (�� -----� ��H -----� (�H ------ (�� ------- (�F ------ -----(DH ------- - y Je Fm-1 og L OH ol--------- ZzL | __. _' OH --- -' ------ OH ow ------ OH 01- OH --____ u� ______ (�H (�ff <�H ------ ------ OH\' ' OH ______ ~` OH ^` 0-- OH -------- O0 OH � ------ (�� ��� ------- (�8 ~~ ' OH-----�«' -- �H --____ OH --- -'' ------ OH Ow OH -------- (�� --------- (�� -------- (�� -------- ------ (�0 OL- -----� OH -----� (------ (�� ------- (DH ------- -----� (�� (�� ------- - (�8 -' -- -- ---------' -- -- -- -- --------- -- -- -- -- -- --------- -- oe ___--- 0 �� ___-- ovi U-1� ---' - ____-- OH/ (�H ---�/ � I-4- -4- -f- -f- -4- -f- -f- -4- -4- -f- -f- -4- -4- � -f- X 0 < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < _ 3 0 Phi 0. UH + + ) &DOH- -00 0 + PO.D-��.o -----O 0 kJrl H P = 0 ik iP 3 .0 e0 = _ — T jo 0. 0.0 ® a 0 s < < a < <1 <1 <1 <1 <� <1 <1 < <1 al < < -72 c t 4- t + + t + t � t t _ 0.0 0.0 0. 1 0. 1 -0. 1 0. i 0. 0. T 0.2 0 . 1 0. 0. -1 0.0 0 ).0 I I _ ®1 . . 1 ® �.�.� - ® .' . + + t � �_ + + - 0. _ <0.4 0 4 OH OH OH a - �_ - — � _ C1-4 �r = _ _ _ _ — `s s � 1 _< __ <__ ® _ O �� O .0.0 _. Oki El � —, S, - _ l 3 < < < <1 <1. < < < 1.1 1< < . � . .1 .1 I 1< 1.1 1< < < . s 1<1 1< 1. .2 J p 1 mom. I 1 7 1 1 ---III 1 12 1 7 1 1 a _ OL- /NU r 3 kJ; r.3 O ri ` O _ O- 3.€3 KENSINGTONOH VJEST O t �F `7 PROPOSED PARKWAY TREE ALONG KENSINGTON ROAD (I OF 1) EXISTING PARKWAY TREE EXISTING PARKWAY TREE TO REMAIN ALONG WEST I TO REMAIN ALONG WEST KENSINGTON ROADi KENSINGTON ROAD _= (I OF 2) (2 OF 2) UY % _ _, 3 _" 1k a OH �� PROPOSED 4 FT __� _ r_� { _ _ g = �� _ �. _� ; } 3 TALL FENCE (TYP.) � } AREA TO BE 3 \ \ l } = LAWN (TYP. 17ILE 5 TAX I GSH NnTFS- I. FOR CONTAINER -GROWN TREES, USE FINGERS OR SMALL HAND TOOLS TO PULL THE ROOTS OUT OF THE OUTER LAYER OF POTTING SOIL; THEN CUT OR PULL APART ANY ROOTS CIRCLING THE PERIMETER OF THE CONTAINER 2. THOROUGHLY SOAK THE TREE ROOT BALL AND ADJACENT PREPARED SOIL SEVERAL TIMES DURING THE FIRST MONTH AFTER PLANTING AND REGULARLY THROUGHOUT THE FOLLOWING TWO SUMMERS. 3. SOIL AMENDMENTS: • MODIFY HEAVY CLAY OR SILT SOILS (MORE THAN 40% CLAY OR SILT) BY ADDING COMPOSTED PINE BARK (UP TO 30% BY VOLUME) OR GYPSUM • MODIFY EXTREMELY SANDY SOILDS (MORE THAN 85% SAND) BY ADDING ORGANIC MATTER AND/OR DRY, SHREDDED CLAY LOAM UP TO 30% OF THE TOTAL MIX AVOID PURCHASING TREES WITH TWO LEADERS OR REMOVE ONE AT PLANTING. PROVIDE A (4811) INCH RIGID TREE OTHERWISE DO NOT PRUNE TREE AT BARK PROTECTOR AROUND THE PLANTING EXCEPT FOR SPECIFIC TRUNK OF CANOPY TREES AND STRUCTURAL CORRECTIONS. UNDERSTORY TREES FOR DEER INSTALL (2) 3" dia. 8' LONG PROTECTION. CEDAR POST IN TO "TREE BARK PROTECTORS - BG48" UNDISTURBED SOIL, THEN (A.M. LEONARD HORTICULTURAL BACKFILL. STAKES SHALL SUPPLY) AT 800-433-0633 OR KEEP TREE VERTICAL AND APPROVED EQUAL Ii PLUMB. SECURE STAKES TO TREE USING 2 ARBORTIES. MARK NORTH SIDE OF TREE IN THE NURSERY AND LOCATE TO THE NORTH IN THE FIELD. SET TOP OF TRUE ROOT BALL I" TO 2" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE OR WHEN IRRIGATION IS NOT SEVERAL INCHES HIGHER IN PROVIDED SPECIFICALLY FOR POORLY DRAINING SOILS. THE TREE, TREEGATOR BAGS ARE RECOMMENDED TO HELP FACILITATE PROPER WATERING � FORM EARTH WATERING SAUCER AROUND TREE DURING THE FIRST TWO YEARS. I AT EDGE OF OOT BALL. WIRE BASKET TO REMOVED MAXIMUM 3" OF SHREDDED BARK MULCH. DO NOT CUT OFF TWINE, OPEN PLACE MULCH WITHIN 6" BURLAP, CUT AS LOW AS OF TREE TRUNK. POSSIBLE AND REMOVE. X =MINIMUM DIAMETER SOIL TO BE PREPARED OF PREPARED SOIL FOR PRIOR TO PLANTING _��� TREE. TREES. SEE TABLE NMIw.. . I III 4" TO 6" DEEPER R.. TLJAK1 Qr'lr'1T QAI -- NnTFS• I. FOR CONTAINER-GROWI POTTING SOIL; THEN CUT O 2. THOROUGHLY SOAK THE PLANTING AND REGULARLY 3. SOIL AMENDMENTS: • MODIFY HEAVY C LAB VOLUME) OR GYPSUM • MODIFY EXTREMELY LOAM UP TO 30% OF AVOID PURCHASING TREES TWO LEADERS OR REMOVE AT PLANTING. OTHERWIS NOT PRUNE TREE AT PLAN EXCEPT FOR SPE STRUCTURAL CORRECTI MARK NORTH SIDE OF TR THE NURSERY AND LOCA1 THE NORTH IN THE F WHEN IRRIGATION IS PROVIDED SPECIFICALLY THE TREE, TREEGATOR JR. ARE RECOMMENDED TO FACILITATE PROPER WATE DURING THE FIRST TWO Y WIRE BASKET TO REM( CUT OFF TWINE, OPEN BUI CUT AS LOW AS POSSIBLE REIN X = MINIMUM VW OF PREPARED FOR TREES. SEE l b� CL LU 0 Z 0 Q Z 0 LL SEE PLAN FOR NUMBEF AND ORIENTATION OF FIXTURE! MOUNTING ARIA Ul LIGHTING MANUFACTURER LIGHT POLE BY LIGHTING MANUFACTURER (SEE NOTE 7) 30'MOUNTING HEIGHT 18' LIGHT POLE 8" ASSUMED POLE DIAMETER 30" FOUNDATION DIAMETER 6'-6" FOUNDATION DEPTH #4 REINFORCING TIES AT 1211 C—C (8) #5 VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT BARS ELECTRIC CONDUIT STUB UP MINIMUM 12 of HANDHOLE WITH COVER ANCHOR BOLTS AND i i HIGH —STRENGTH BASE PLATE BY LIGHTING i i NON —SHRINK MANUFACTURER i i GROUT i 1" CHAMFER 3611i CURB OR EDGE 24 OF PAVEMENT LANDSCAPING -7- TMIN. Z Z 3 TIES AT If 4 C—C COMPACTED SUITABLE BACKFILL TO 95% OPTIMUM VERTICAL I I DRY PROCTOR DENSITY IN 42 REINFORCEMENT BARS IL LIFTS OF LESS THAN 911 OF EQUALLY SPACED 3" CLEAR COVER UNCOMPACTED SOIL FOR ALL REBAR CAST —IN —PLACE CONCRETE ROUND PIER FOUNDATION, 3000 PSI ------- J4 AIR —ENTRAINED REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE AT 28 DAYS TIES SPACING = 7 J (1211 OVERLAP) fT*TA N. 1 12 Key,►Y The Prevai ITm LED pole and and installation of poles an Prevail area, site and roadm square straight steel pole, z hardware. Stock configurat combinations. The Prevail I and value in patent pendin( savings greater than 85% a The Prevail fixture and pole applications. SPECIFICATION FEATURE! Construction Construction is comprised heavy-duty, single -piece dii aluminum housing in dark polyester powder paint. TK cast aluminum door is tethi provide easy access to the, if replacement is required.' optics is mounted on a verE aluminum plate that dissipi heat from the LEDs resultin longer life of the fixture. Th is IP66 and 3G vibration rat (ANSI C136.31). Optics Available in Type III and IV distributions with lumen pE ranging from 7,000 to 20,OC nominal lumens. Light engi configurations consist of 1 2 high -efficacy LEDs mouni to metal -core circuit boardE maximize heat dissipation i promote long life (up to L9' hours at 5°C) per IESNA T For the ultimate level of spi control, an optional house, shield accessory can be fiel factory installed. 244" [70mry 13-15/16" 1354mml POLE MOUNT ARM -- �H --____ __. OH __- _'. _X%� ____-- (�Fk _____— OH �H OH-----' 0(��� ___-- OH OH— (�M -----' `~n � uj (�� --------- (�� -------- (�� -------- (�0 -------- ------ (�� -----� ��H -----� (�H (�� ------ (�F (�� ------- (�� -----� — -----(�H ------- — 5e ` ^@ VICINITY MAP NO SCALE SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS nm RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC, THE STATE OF ILLINOIS AND THE MUNICIPALITY IN AND TO THAT PART OF THE LAND, TAKEN AND USED FOR ROAD PURPOSES. RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC AND QUASI -PUBLIC UTILITIES, IF ANY, IN SAID STREETS FOR MAINTENANCE THEREIN OF POLES, CONDUITS, SEWERS AND OTHER FACILITIES. AFFECTS THE WEST PORTION OF THE LAND FALLING WITHIN MAIN STREET, THE NORTHERLY PORTION FALLING WITHIN KENSINGTON ROAD AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF THE LAND FALLING WITHIN RAND ROAD. nN DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY BY WILLIAM M. POHLMAN, ET AL, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, RECORDED NOVEMBER 7, 1922 AS DOCUMENT N0. 7671364. AFFECTS THAT PART OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTH 361.6 FEET OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING WEST OF THE CENTER LINE OF RAND ROAD, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ,,1,4FOUND 7/8" O.D.I.P. FOUND 7/8" O.D.I.P. A 268.9(R) V 139.021(R) LOT A HUNTZICKER'S 2ND SUBDIVISION (DOC. 27428292) Z m —G G G G G7 -I 0 I m m V) U : i • W W �W G —uHW �OHW- OH W OHW- c� OHW OHW Q v T �Q G G G c� N � N �9S (ALSO KNOWN AS FOUNDRY ROAD)' CI S C ) Q m N 12" PER ATLAS STM � oHw OHw S OHW ER OHW P OHW NC. 1.13N 1.40'W CURB 0.53'N 0.56'W v v 03 Z Z --Im Z0 C�FNJ co c: D r vn rn c� w= 0 I �� �D Z O c� z �7 —OHW w nu E E E OHw OHW . N _ OHW OHW Ln Gw G W G w w w 10" PER A LAS RQ G 6.2! W u ; 12' SIGN ;& LANDSCAPING EASEMENT CURB 0.34' ; WEST 1 o ; d• • J, , ..', �' 13.20lilt w b 0 " N Q' APPROXIMATE LIMITS U) oOF UNDERGROUND m m� DETENTION (11 X40'-60" CMP) m m zv . PER PLANS m c c F O s F S �D 9 c) -G LG c� 0 m m D . r r D D r C/) y . I �U v 7- G LoHw OHW -OHW ---,95 Ch. ANrV QrO 0 I Z 0 > c: C/) --H -UHW OHW pHW OHW S OHW ,s OH T W W OH W OH Q S� •`S�� ,. � Otis \ �� G G G ry O N 5��� Q9s N � + ti (ALSO KNOWN AS FOUNDRY ROAjD),,q (A STORM STRUCTURE CURB GRATE m N 2' DIA. CONCRETE RIM=671.20IE=664.50(E)10"RCP12" PER ATLAS STM SST �� E , .<'6" -,. E E � E OHW + 0 �,�� O� —ram E —OHW OHW �R G W � W r P _ • W 10" PER ATLAS rp co 65-72- IN 61 Off' ��• '• - ����•��3�� - �_--- � +co1� ���• `------------------------ 12r-SIGN-*.-&-LANDSCAPING EASEMENT 1 O 52.1' gj el�o 9 0 STORM STRUCTUI co./ mo �' �'sj �6+�0 1� o , �O+ OPEN GRA � mtL � ,�O• o • ,�O• 4' DIA. UNKNOI Q• ' O 6 �o ri Qb Q c� + RIM=670. °' _ ;� `•� IE=664.45(NW SW)48"CI rn = rq O OFFSET STORM STRUCTURE ; INTO STRUCTUI > ifO = :+ m OPEN GRATE 'S ,�►��` '3 O'N�f _- mi 4' DIA. UNKNOWN 1 =` r? � RIM=670.13 0�'O �.�0 F IE 663 8 MP _ 3(E W)48"C .' i-44 ; + = 1 2' - 0" Vacuum Canopy Elevation # 1 3/8" = 1 '-0" ... l - u� „ - Page 164mMOUNT PROSPECTmRAND, 1 E Rand Rd, Mt Prospect 1160056 _ v oZ!\ CAR k!�VWASH Code Check Pail e Page 165 of 455 CAR k!EVWASH Site Plan r4 3 Page 166 of 455 Pae e� wnsH �" � O PANFORMEDandEMBOSSEDMONUMENTSIGN P ELwBCWwUSMw60 81w 611 x 711w 0" Pan FoMed Sign @ 1V OAH CHV Construction eL Circle Logo Design is Pink to match 3M 3630-38 Fucsia - Embossed CAR WASH is Blue to match PMS 2757 C / 3M 3630-157 - Embossed Pan Formed White background All Graphics Mask & Sprayed 2nd Surface of Clear Poly White LED Illumination - 4Verical Rows 6500K NOTE: Base Painted SW 7656 Rhinestone Program Colors B - White FI LE#26_6-27-F-E LCW-A2 �Y Customer Approval:Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review by Dualite Engineering. Scale: 1/4" - 1'- 0" Date: 7-2-2026 Page 167 of 455 Pae �k!eVWASH 1 E Rand Rd, Mt Prospect 1160056 INSTALLED ON BRICK TOWER SURFACE eL Circle Logo Design is Pink 3M 3630-38 Fucsia Vinyl on 1st Surface of Polycarbonate Pink T-Mobile Trim Cap CM-171015 Returns - 3 3/8" Deep Jo match 3M 3630-38 Fucsia Vinyl White LED Illumination - 6500K - Front Illumination Program Colors Square Footage t- n 1.4 2-_. North Elevation Scale: 1/16" = 11- 0" 3 White£ FILE#26-6-27-F-ELM-B3 JY Customer Approval: Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review by Dualite Engineering. Scale: 1/4" - 1'- 0" Date: 7-8-2026 WWW.DUALITE.COM / @DUALITEINC @DUALITETWEETS This design is exclusive property of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. • 1 Dualite Lane • Williamsburg, OH 45176 I) ua lite One Dualite Lane Copyright 2026 Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this proprietary work without the Williamsburg, Ohio 45176 0permission of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. will subject the user to liability under the copyright statutes of the United States. i 0 0 0 Page 168 of 455 CAR ° e_ wasH No S*Ignage On This Elevation South Elevation Scale: 1/16" = 11- 0" Program Colors White Pi e FI LE#26_6-27-F-E LCW-Cl JY Customer Approval:Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review by Dualite Engineering. Scale: 1 /4" - 1'- 0" Date: 6-9-2026 WWW.DUALITE.COM / @DUALITEINC @DUALITETWEETS This design is exclusive property of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. • 1 Dualite Lane • Williamsburg, OH 45176 1)ualiole One Dualite Lane Copyright 2026 Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this proprietary work without the Williamsburg, Ohio 45176 Gpermission of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. will subject the user to liability under the copyright statutes of the United States. i Page 169 of 455 Pae e� wnsH �" � � INSTALLED ON BRI(KTOWERSURFA(E eL Circle Logo Design is Pink 3M 3630-38 Fucsia Vinyl on 1st Surface of Polycarbonate Pink T-Mobile Trim Cap CM-171015 Returns - 3 3/8"Deep -To match 3M 3630-38 Fucsia Vinyl White LED Illumination - 6500K - Front Illumination East Elevation Scale: 3/64---,--o-- Program Colors White _t J. I 'Emom I oi # "s _ FI LE#26-6-27-F-E LCW-D4 JY Customer Approval:Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review by Dualite Engineering. Scale: 1/4" - 1'- 0" Date: 7-8-2026 www.DUALITE.COM / @DUALITEINC @DUALITETWEETS This design is exclusive property of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. • 1 Dualite Lane • Williamsburg, OH 45176 One Dualite Lane Copyright 2026 Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this proprietary work without the iOuatiole Williamsburg, Ohio 45176 i0 0 permission of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. will subject the user to liability under the copyright statutes of the United States. Page 170 of 455 Pae �k!�VWASH 1 E Rand Rd, Mt Prospect 1160056 INSTALLED ON BRICK TOWER SURFACE ELmBCWmLm21 L 'm 0" - 1 O'm 8" a CA� - _ - _ -near ASH 10'- 8" 2 - 5 7 - 81/2 eL Circle Logo Design is Pink 3M 3630-38 Fucsia Vinyl CAR WASH - Painted Blue PMS 2757C Perforated Vinyl F_ on 1st Surface of Polycarbonate 1st Surface on 2406 White Acrylic 2'- 0" _ 2„ Pink T-Mobile Trim Cap CM-171015 Blue T1-0032 Gemini Trim Cap 5'� R WAS I Returns - 3 3/8" Deep -To match 3M 3630-38 Fucsia Vinyl Chevron Silver Returns - 3 3/8" Deep White LED Illumination - 6500K - Front Illumination White LED Illumination - 6500K - Front Illumination MEW Ilk _ t West Elevation Scale: 3/64" = 1'- 0" Program Colors 3 - White_ FILE#26-6-27-F-ELM-E3 jY Customer Approval: Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review by Dualite Engineering. Scale: 1/4" - 1'- 019 " Date: 7-8-2026 WWW.DUALITE.COM / @DUALITEINC0 @DUDALITETWEETS This design is exclusive property of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. • 1 Dualite Lane • Williamsburg, OH 45176 ua lite One Dualite Lane Copyright 2026 Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this proprietary work without the Williamsburg, Ohio 45176 i permission of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. will subject the user to liability under the copyright statutes of the United States. Page 171 of 455 Program Colors �: _ 1�►�IF.Y►�L� White MP 18074 Sparkle Silver SW 7656 Rhinestone FILE#26-6-27-F-ELCW-F1 JY Customer Approval: Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review by Dualite Engineering. Scale: 3/4" - 1'- 0" Date: 6-9-2026 WWW.DUALITE.COM / @DUALITEINC @DUALITETWEETS This design is exclusive property of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. • 1 Dualite Lane • Williamsburg, OH 45176 19ualite One Dualite Lane Copyright 2026 Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this proprietary work without the Williamsburg, Ohio 45176 00000 permission of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. will subject the user to liability under the copyright statutes of the United States. Page 172 of 455 Pae e� wnsH 1 E Rand Rd, Mt Prospect 1160056 DOUBLE FACE DIRECTIONAL SIGN 1 -on N W 1 'm 4" 3m 0" D' ecti a' @ 3 -m OA11 Directional Sign Digital Printed on White ACMw/ Lamination MP 18074 Sparkle Silver Cabinet and SW 7656 Rhinestone Pole Cover Single Face will have a MP 18074 Sparkle Silver ACM back Non Illuminated - MM2 Housing 3'- 0" Side 1 1'- 7" x 2'- 0" Pole Cover Program Colors Digital File Name Same as Sketch.pdf Illumination NO Surface 1st Print To ACM Lamination YES Contour Cut NO Backs ra White NO BackScreen White NO Digital White NO Distortion Required NO Color Match YES Color Build Required YES NOTES: 31- 0" 1 4 3/4" Side 2 1'- 4" 3'- 0" 1'- 7"x 2'- 0" Pole Cover �3 3 MM White £ MP 18074 Sparkle Silver SW 7656 Rhinestone FILE#26-6-27-F-E LCW-G 1 JY Customer Approval:Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review by Dualite Engineering. Scale: 3/4" - 1'- 0" Date: 6-9-2026 WWW.DUALITE.COM / @DUALITEINC @DUALITETWEETS This design is exclusive property of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. • 1 Dualite Lane • Williamsburg, OH 45176 ua flote One Dualite Lane Copyright 2026 Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this proprietary work without the Williamsburg, Ohio 45176 G 0 0 0 permission of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. will subject the user to liability under the copyright statutes of the United States. Page 173 of 455 P�e � e� WASH � " � � DOUBLE FACE DIRECTIONALSIGN - - M .F- I IM D F V Alm W� D - Ym OAM NEW 1 4 Directional Sign Digital Printed on White ACM w/ Lamination MP 18074 Sparkle Silver Cabinet and SW 7656 Rhinestone Pole Cover Single Face will have a MP 18074 Sparkle Silver ACM back Non Illuminated -MM2 Housing 3'- 0" Side 1 V- 4" 3'- 0" V- 8" 11- 7"x 2'- 0" Pole Cover Program Colors Diaital File Name I Same as Sketchmdf Surface 1st Print To ACM Lamination YES Contour Cut NO Backs ra White NO BackScreen White NO Di ital White NO Distortion Required NO Color Match YES Color Build Required YES NOTES: 31- 0" 1 4 3/4" Side 2 V- 4" 3'- 0" 1,- 8" 1'- 7"x 2'- 0" Pole Cover �: 1�►�IF.Y►�L� White MP 18074 Sparkle Silver SW 7656 Rhinestone FILE#26-6-27-F-E LCW-H �Y Customer Approval: Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review y Dualite Engineering. Scale: 3/4" - 1'- 0" Date: 6-9-2026 WWW.DUALITE.COM / @DUALITEINC @DUALITETWEETS This design is exclusive property of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. • 1 Dualite Lane • Williamsburg, OH 45176 19ualite One Dualite Lane Copyright 2026 Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this proprietary work without the Williamsburg, Ohio 45176 00000 permission of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. will subject the user to liability under the copyright statutes of the United States. Page 174 of 455 0 CAR Pa e 1e)WASH 1 E Rand Rd, Mt Prospect 1160056 (D LANE SIGNS -Pole Structure &Clearance Signs bOthers Topper M'993 Un x H,--. 2 4_25 in, GUESI., CMA-RANCE 10 by Others M 58 in x',Ht 5 In Topper M -093 i,rt x K 242 5 in Program Colors White Mi M h UMTH-A M � Others White LED Illumination - 6500K NOTE: CLEARANCE SIGN is at 10'0"height FILEM-6-27-F-ELM-12 JY Customer Approval: Note: Dimensions are Approximate and Subject to Change Pending Review by Dualite Engineering. ... .................... ................................................................................................... Scale: INITS Date: 7-2-2026 WWW.DUALITE.COM @DUALITEINC @DUALITETWEETS I This design is exclusive property of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. - I Dualite Lane -Williamsburg, OH 45176 One Dualite Lane Copyright 2026 Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this proprietary work without the 1)uallte Williamsburg, Ohio 45176 00060 permission of Dualite Sales & Service, Inc. will subject the user to liability under the copyright statutes of the United States. Page 175 of 455 SOUNDWALLS I FINISH LEVELS Madeftom ligbtweigbt PVCpanels,AIL Sound Walls are available in a variety of attractive colors and textures in both Standard and Upgraded Finish Levels. 0Sllta���p mmr Flu Imll�l �1111VIuo luuu.Vu Our Standard Finish Level provides an economical and attractive sound barrier wall with smooth panels and galvanized steel posts. Features: I����opo Smooth panels IU�uoo�mFour standard colors available Galvanized steel posts Options: ioo�ioAdd post sleeves and caps' Add an embossed woodgrain texture to standard color panels 1Not available on all post sizes. pl9lUlullllr � uuuumVlr �I�� �IIti �UlUuuim um umm ,o`olll moll oop a ql pIIV �luiiii o1411iV imuul �miul pUVI� �VIIIII11Vr o uuuuV°° mIIV1VVIV� �I�liile�lli�u�llllllli ��������� �Vu� ��luu��lllllll� IViumll II������� mmoio�� �������� ("Ill�lllliltlal�l allllllllim�� �lull�»ti9m� We offer four popular Standard Finish Colors that are designed to enhance any application: Gray, Adobe, Tan and White. Woodgrain texture can be added to any Standard Finish Color as an option. 2Color reproduction is subject to limitations of the printing process and/or screen viewing. Please ask your AIL Sound Walls Technical Sales Representative for actual White uuuuuuur �loo molo� �iii g IIC ���,��oii»>uNun»uuoi l u� impIlllatiwi»ii� Iluuu Our Upgraded Finish Level captures the essence of traditional wood fencing in a durable PVC sound barrier wall.lhis finish level features woodgrain colored/textured panels accented by post sleeves, caps, top/bottom rails and reinforcement panels in one of our Standard Colors. Features: Woodgrain colored/textured panels Two woodgrain colors available Jopi�io Post sleeves, caps, top/bottom rails and reinforcement panels in one of our Standard Colors' Options: Choose a Standard Color for post sleeves, caps, top/ bottom rails and reinforcement panels Add woodgrain texture to top/bottom rails and reinforcement panels Upgraded Finish Colors': We offer two popular Upgraded Finish Colors to enhance any application: Green Teak and Honey Maple. Accent Colors for Post Sleeves, Caps, Top/Bottom Rails and Reinforcement Panels: 'Top Rails are always needed, but are not available in Green Teak or Honey Maple colors.lhe requirement for bottom rails and mid -wall reinforcement Tan panels varies with sound barrier size and other factors. Larger post sizes may require powder coat finish instead of sleeves. Ask your AIL Sound Walls Technical Sales Representative for details before ordering. ►SOUND WALLS White A member of ��GONc�uI N IIIIII�IIII �ti������»���hl �ti�ti ��h�� Illlllllll�ii� �IIIIIIIIIII�IIIII '�i� Ill����11° THE AIL GROUP OF COMPANIES Atlantic Industries Limited BRIIDGE INTERNATIONAL SOUNDWALLS Page 177 of 455 � DRAWING No. � STD DRAWING-SW-100 COVER SHEET STD DRAWING-SW-110 TYPICAL ELEVATION D STD DRAWING-SW-120 TYPICAL ASSEMBLY I� STD DRAWING-SW-130 FOUNDATION STEPPINC STD DRAWING-SW-140 TYPICAL INSIDE 900 BI SOUNDWALLS - STANDARD DRAWING INK A 111061 TUF-BARRIER@ / SILENT PROTECTOR@ SOUND WALL TUF BARRIER and SILENT PROTECTOR panels are manufactured in accordance with ASTM F3459 - Standard Specification for Rigid Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) Exterior Profiles Used for Sound Walls. z V) w a _H L� w w V) ~ w o- nL/) ry w r V) Q oar o >- F- r N 71±2 71Vj6"±j6 1 13mm 21 0 HOLE 25mm (11 0 DRILLED LIFTING HOLE X WELD \ACROSS END STEEL POST AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN FLAT BAR (MIN 75mm [31 WIDE) AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN FLUSH SIDE OF SOUNDWALL ASSEMBLY o� a- o a- o N 71±2 [V16„+Y16„] z LD cn w _wo Of u > u- u w _ Q L7 w w TOP OF STRUCTURE _ �-- V) Lnry o w 0-r Lr, Ln a CENTRELINE OF TOP BOLT HOLE ELEVATION SEE SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN 5 8mm(/6 )0 HOLES 25mm [11 0 LIFTING HOLE FLUSH SIDE OF SOUNDWALL ASSEMBLY WELDED (a F WEB & WELD THREE SIDES SPECIFIC FLUSH SIDE OF SOUNDWALL ASSEMBLY TUF—BARRIER OR SILENT PROTECTOR PANELS _' N FLAT BAR (MIN 75mm [31 WIDE) AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN 8mm [16"]0 HOLE WELD X ACROSS END X 25mm [110 LIFTING HOLE SOUND STEEL POST — W SECTION c/w FLAT BARS (WELDED) — SEE SCHEDULE FOR BEAM SIZES AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN N 50mm MIN. WELD VARIES [21 X ACROSS END BENT PLATE AS PER SPECIFIC DESIGN FLAT BAR AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN TUF—BARRIER OR SILENT PROTECTOR PANELS FLAT BAR (MIN. 75mm [31 W TUF—BARRIER OR AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESI 61 SILENT PROTECTOR PANELS [2%4„] 25mm [110 LIFTING HC Ln= N ;;--- TYPICAL OUTSIDE BEND DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 8mm [16]0 HOLE TUF BA SILENT PROTECTOI FLAT BAR (MIN. 75mm AS PER SITE SPECIFI 8mm( 16 TUF-BARRIER OR SILENT PROTECTOR PANELS BENT PLATE AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN FLAT BAR AS PER ' SOUNDWAL SILENT PROT FLAT BAR (MIN. AS PER SITE S STEEL POST - W SEC BARS & BENT P - SEE SCHEDULE F( AS PER SITE E TYPICAL INSIDE BEND DETAIL gFAI F• N T q � DRAWING No. � STD DRAWING-SW-200 COVER SHEET STD DRAWING-SW-210 TYPICAL FOUNDATION STD DRAWING-SW-220 TYPICAL FOUNDATION STD DRAWING-SW-230 TYPICAL ANCHOR ROD SOUNDWALLS - STANDARD DRAWING 1Yi111►1�1_��[�l���l�l_\I� TUF-BARRIER@ / SILENT PROTECTOR@ SOUND WALL TUF BARRIER and SILENT PROTECTOR panels are manufactured in accordance with ASTM F3459 - Standard Specification for Rigid Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) Exterior Profiles Used for Sound Walls. N( PF ti 0 o ANCHOR RODS - SIZE, v LOCATION & PROJECTION a `L LJL_j AS PER SITE SPECIFIC H w CD0- Lo DESIGN fy- w LU w (A STEEL POST w/ BASE PLATE a w AS PER SITE SPECIFIC M 0- DESIGN Q a -� FOUNDATION DETAIL �21SCALE: NTS NOTE: LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE POSITIONED AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH BOTTOM ANCHOR - - ASSEMBLY y c ,FOUNDATION DETAIL SW-210 : 'SCALE: NTS �1FLANGE MOUNTED FOUNDATION DETAIL SW-210 : SCALE: NTS nIAMFTFR nF rAISSnN STEEL POST AS PER SITE SPECIFIC [ FOUNDATION DETAIL SW-220;"SCALE: NTS DIRECT BURY POST FOUNDATION DETAIL ,SW-220.'SCALE: NTS SNUG -TIGHT 3LY: UT ASTM A563-DH USHER F436 kSHER F436 UT ASTM A563-DH JPERIOR 1107 ADVANTAGE z 37 E =ACTURE'S INSTRUCTIONS r_1 ,TYPICAL ANCHOR ROD DETAIL '.SW-230i SCALE N.T.S. ANCHOR ROD AS PER SITE DESIGN HEAVY HEX NUT -ASTM A563-DH BEARING PLATE AS PER SITE SPI HEAVY HEX NUT -ASTM A563-DH A ;BOTTOM ANCHOR ASSEMBI SSW-230' SCALE: NTS � DRAWING No. � STD DRAWING-SW-300 COVER SHEET STD DRAWING-SW-310 TYPICAL ELEVATION D STD DRAWING-SW-320 TYPICAL ASSEMBLY I'- STD DRAWING-SW-330 FOUNDATION STEPPWC STD DRAWING-SW-340 PANEL RETENTION DEl SOUNDWALLS - STANDARD DRAWING TUF-BARRIER@ / SILENT PROTECTOR@ SOUND WALL TUF BARRIER and SILENT PROTECTOR panels are manufactured in accordance with ASTM F3459 - Standard Specification for Rigid Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) Exterior Profiles Used for Sound Walls. z U, C LL- LL a U, LL V; ry LL n U, a LL c n TOP PANEL SILENT PROTECTOR OR TUF-BARRIER PANELS (AS REQUIRED) STEEL POST TUF-BARRIER PANEL WITH STEEL C-CHANNEL (1 REQD) EXISTING GRADE VARIES CONCRETE FOUNDATION �AS f TOP PANEL SILENT PROTECTOR PANEL -ROUTING PATTERN TO FACE NOISE - QUANTITY & LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY SITE SPECIFIC DES [aN;I_IILIAI STEEL POST c/w FLAT BAR - AS REQUIRED BY SITE SPECIFIC SILENT PROTECTOR OR TUF-BARRIER PANELS TUF-BARRIER PANEL WITH STEEL STIFFENER POST (FLANGE REMOVED FOR CLARITY) TUF-BARRIER PANEL PIECE -300mm LONG 11Z"1 TYPICAL STEPPED DETAIL - TYPICAL FOR GROUND MOUNTED POSTS SCALE: N.T.S. TYPICAL STEPPED DETAIL 'ANEL 150 LONG %NIZED kDED ROD & NUT POST ASSEMBLY R SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN TYPICAL PANEL RETENTION DETAIL - PLAN VIEW SCALE: N.T.S. 9.50X150 LONG GALVANIZED THREADED ROD & NUT (TYP.) TOP PANEL STEEL POST ASSEMBLY AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN CAVEn LONG GALVANIZED & NUT (TYP.) ANEL POST ASSEMBLY R SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN OPTIONAL PANEL RETENTION DETAIL (ON FLAT BAR) -PLAN VIEW SCALE: N.T.S. 60X50 LONG GALVANIZED BOLT & NUT (TYP.) TOP PANEL STEEL POST ASSEMBLY AS PER SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN INTERNATIONAL DRYING STEALTH PREDATOR DRYING SYSTEM .. M a�MMIlf�N 30feet ° 614,,�B,, dV at „ I U I��rt� ' w� �IWI� ,I��),ml IIIIII p �wwwwwwww� �r � , e e' Iml W 0 fl'WI mI01011MI01 fMN �j „emu �� , a t MEN ICI ,3 f�� w� elt. v,�ronWm�mma' feet 1oW�, I��x Ife . r I' 'wi t WWWW ry,� 'uPo bwl� ° ,ve" The Stealth Predator fealtures patent ift pe n d i ng " Reve rse f low a ICI r 'tech j , d Iwh � I ich ,,reaI,. I the first "Ultria I IQuielt Dryer" ai,f ,., Most � � II powerIf ul Ultra Quiet Dry�e ':f,...'� U➢�..� , INTERNATIONAL. DRYI '�,,,,,n� I�! ID�R� � II C I P ECI F I � i i ulvi" 1, 0 � �" II age 195 of 455 FF7777,`�, I, .7 77� Page 200 of 455 This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for a proposed car wash to be located in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The site, which is currently occupied by a vacant building previously occupied by a CVS Pharmacy, is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Kensington Road with Rand Road. The plans call for redeveloping the site to provide a 4,830 square -foot automated car wash tunnel with 28 vacuum stalls. Access will continue to be provided off Rand Road and Main Street. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site. The sections of this report present the following: Existing roadway conditions A description of the proposed development Directional distribution of the development -generated traffic Vehicle generation for the proposed development Future traffic conditions including access to the development Traffic analysis for the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours Recommendations with respect to the adequacy of the development's access system and adjacent roadway network Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours for the following conditions: 1. Existing Condition - Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. 2. Year 2031 No -Build Condition — Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using the existing peak hour traffic volumes increased by an ambient growth factor to project Year 2031 background conditions. 3. Year 2031 Total Projected Condition - The future projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes increased by an ambient area growth factor (growth not attributable to any particular development) and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed car wash. Car Tf` is h Page 201 of 455 Site Location Figure 1 ar Wi7 : Page 202 of 455 Aerial View of Site Figure 2 ar Wi7 : Page 203 of 455 Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on field visits conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices, and existing peak hour traffic volumes. The site, which currently contains a vacant building, is located at 1 East Rand Road in Mount Prospect, Illinois. Land uses in the vicinity of the site are primarily commercial and residential and include a Chipotle, Wild Fork, Five Guys, Lush Nail Spa, and Kimber Automotive. The site is bordered by Kensington Road to the north, Rand Road to the east, Main Street to the west, and Intelligent Plumbing Services and Kimber Automotive to the south. The characteristics of the existing roadways serving the subject property are described below and illustrated in Figure 3. US 12 (Rand Road) is a northwest -southeast other principal arterial roadway that in the vicinity of the site provides two travel lanes in each direction. At its signalized intersection with IL 831 US 12 provides two through lanes and an exclusive right -turn lane on the northwestbound approach and an exclusive left -turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the southeastbound approach. A high -visibility crosswalk is provided on the southeastbound approach. At its signalized intersection with Kensington Road, US 12 provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane with right -turn movements channelized on the northwestbound approach and an exclusive left -turn lane and three through lanes on the southeastbound approach. A high -visibility crosswalk is provided on the northwestbound approach. At its unsignalized intersection with the site access drive, US 12 provides two through lanes on the northwestbound approach and three through lanes that transition along to site frontage to two lanes approximately 225 feet south of Kensington Road on the southeastbound approach. At the existing site access drive, the roadway is wide enough to accommodate two through lanes and a shared through/right-turn lane. Left -turn movements on the northwestbound approach can be accommodated by the striped median. At its unsignalized intersections with the Just Tires/Kimber Automotive access drives, US 12 provides a through lane and a shared through/right- turn lane on the northwestbound and southeastbound approaches. Left -turn movements on both approaches can be accommodated by the striped median. US 12 is designated as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA), is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and carries an annual average daily traffic (AADT) of 21,400 vehicles east of IL 83, 20,800 vehicles between IL 83 and Kensington Road, and 20,300 vehicles south of Kensington Road (IDOT 2025). US 12 has a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour. Car °'ts A40tint Proq)ecl, I11111i"nois 4 Ir1w OANI!,4k Page 204 of 455 IL 83 (Elmhurst / is a north -south other principal arterial road way that in the vicinity of the site provides two travel lanes in each direction. At its signalized intersection with US 12, IL 83 provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches with right -turn movements channelized on the southbound approach. A high visibility crosswalk is provided on the southbound approach. A its signalized intersection with Kensington Road, IL 83 provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the northbound approach and a through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the southbound approach. A high -visibility crosswalk is provided on the northbound approach. At its unsignalized intersection with the site access drive, IL 83 provides a through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the northbound approach and a shared left-turn/through lane and a through lane on the southbound approach. IL 83 is designated as an SRA, is under the jurisdiction of IDOT, and carries an AADT of 16,200 vehicles north of US 121 14,200 vehicles between US 12 and Kensington Road, and 16,400 vehicles south of Kensington Road (IDOT 2025). IL 83 has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. Kensington Road is an east -west major collector roadway that in the vicinity of the site provides two travel lanes in each direction. At its signalized intersection with US 12, Kensington Road provides a through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and a shared left-turn/through lane, a through lane, and an exclusive right -turn lane on the westbound approach. A high -visibility crosswalk is provided on the westbound approach. At its signalized intersection with IL 83, Kensington Road provides a shared left-turn/through lane, a through lane, and an exclusive right -turn lane on the eastbound approach and a shared left-turn/through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the westbound approach. A high -visibility crosswalk is provided on the eastbound approach. Kensington Road is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect east of IL 83 and under the jurisdiction of IDOT west of IL 83, carries an AADT of 6,500 vehicles east of IL 831 6,400 vehicles between IL 83 and US 12, and 8,500 vehicles west of US 12 (IDOT 2025), and has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour east of IL 83 and 35 miles per hour west of US 12. As a part of the Rand Road Corridor Plan, which was approved by the Village of Mount Prospect Board of Trustees in February 2017, the Village is improving the roadway geometry of the US 12/IL 83/Kensington Road intersection. The Village is currently in Phase II (right-of-way acquisition and design engineering) where the project plans and specifications are developed and the property is acquired. The following lists the proposed improvements to the roadway network with construction anticipated to begin in 2026: US 12 with IL 83 US 12 will be restriped on the northwestbound approach to provide two through lanes and a shared through/right-turn lane. IL 83 will be widened to provide another exclusive left -turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches. Car t f,'s Nlount Prospect, Illinois 6 114k ICAL OAI Page 206 of 455 US 12 with Kensington US 12 will be widened on the northwestbound approach to provide another through lane. Kensington Road will be widened to provide an exclusive right -turn lane on the eastbound approach and an exclusive left -turn lane on the westbound approach. IL 83 with Kensington Road IL 83 will be widened to provide another through lane and an exclusive right -turn lane on the northbound approach and an exclusive right -turn lane on the southbound approach. Kensington Road will be widened to provide an exclusive left -turn lane on the eastbound and westbound approaches. In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts using Miovision Scout Collection Units on Tuesday, September 30, 2025, during the weekday morning (7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M.) and weekday evening (4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.) peak hours and on Saturday, September 27, 2025, during the Saturday midday peak hour (12:00 P.M. to 2:00 P.M.) at the following intersections: US 12 with IL 83 US 12 with Kensington Road IL 83 with Kensington Road US 12 with Just Tires/Kimber Automotives north access drives US 12 with Just Tires/Kimber Automotives south access drives The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:45 A.M. to 8:45 A.M., the weekday evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:45 P.M. to 5:45 P.M., and the Saturday midday peak hour of traffic occurs from 12:00 P.M. to 1:00 P.M. Figure 4 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes. Copies of the traffic count summary sheets are included in the Appendix. KLOA, Inc. obtained crash datal for the most recent available five years (2020 to 2024) for the triangle intersection of US 12 with IL 83 and Kensington Road and IL 83 with Kensington Road, and US 12 with the Just Tires/Kimber Automotives access drives. A summary of the crashes at the intersections can be found in Tables 1 and 2. A review of the crash data indicates that no fatalities were reported at the intersections within the study area. 1 IDOT DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s). r °" its A40i,itit Pro,sj)ect", Illitiois 7 Ir1w OA Page 207 of 455 N O tC W N --► O L CO .� v ^ C N rmn u u u �— 66 (110) 1811 586 (728) [ 7081 AAi 53 (48) 1251 587 (692) 15661 75 (91) [97] `. �, cn ^coo or � u N ^ OF u N O co Fm-1 m z cn z 0 z o� `'6 Lo 464 (639) [551] MAIN STREET Table 1 US 12, IL 83, AND KENSINGTON ROAD — CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Severity PD 2020 6 0 0 9 3 17 0 35 27 0 0 2021 4 1 1 7 3 19 0 35 27 0 0 2022 5 0 0 8 2 12 0 27 21 0 0 2023 7 0 0 7 3 15 1 33 27 0 0 2024 7 0 0 6 5 13 0 31 18 0 0 Total 29 1 1 37 16 76 1 161 120 0 0 Avg 5.8 <1.0 <1.0 7.4 3.2 15.2 <1.0 32.2 24.0 -- A — Angle; HO — Head On; 0 — Object; RE — Rear End; S — Sideswipe; T — Turning PD — Property Damage; I — Injury; F - Fatal Table 2 US 12 WITH JUST TIRES/KIMBER AUTOMOTIVES ACCESS DRIVES — CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Severity PD 2020 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 3 0 0 2021 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2022 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 2 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2024 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 Total 2 0 0 3 1 5 1 14 10 0 0 Avg <1.0 -- -- <1.0 <1.0 1.0 <1.0 2.8 2.0 -- -- A — Angle; HO — Head On; 0 — Object; RE — Rear End; S — Sideswipe; T — Turning PD — Property Damage; I — Injury; F - Fatal Car Pf,'s Nlount Prospect, Illinois 9 114k ICAL 0A1 Page 209 of 455 In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. r �► r r.. . As proposed, the plans call for redeveloping the site to provide a 4,830 square -foot automated car wash tunnel with 28 vacuum stalls. Access to the site will be provided via the following: • The existing full movement access drive off US 12 located approximately 300 feet south of Kensington Road will be converted into a right-in/right-out access drive. This access drive will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements restricted to right -turn movements only. The restriction will be enforced physically via an island median and via signage. Outbound movements should be under stop sign control. • The existing full -movement access drive off IL 83 located approximately 310 feet south of Kensington Road will be converted into a right-in/right-out access drive. This access drive will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements restricted to right -turn movements only. The restriction will be enforced physically via an island median and via signage. Outbound movements should be under stop sign control. Car Wash I Circulation The automated car wash tunnel will be located on the west side of the site, oriented north -south with vacuum stalls located on the east side of the tunnel and in the middle of the site. Access to the car wash tunnel entrance will be provided via the drive aisle along the Rand Road frontage and will provide three approach lanes and two pay stations. Approximately 50 feet before the pay stations, the three approach lanes will merge into two approach lanes and immediately after the pay stations, the two approach lanes will narrow to one lane that leads to the entrance of the car wash tunnel. As proposed, the single -lane automatic car wash tunnel will be an exterior -only car wash system and will provide one-way, counterclockwise circulation. Manual and automated controls will increase, decrease, or stop vehicle flow through the car wash. The entrance to the car wash will be oriented towards the north of the site and the exit will be located towards the south. The gates will meter the traffic flow proceeding to the car wash tunnel entrance and will open in sequence based on the order of vehicle arrival. Once the gate is lifted for the respective lane, the individual vehicle will proceed west and then perform a left turn to face the entrance to the car wash tunnel. At the entrance to the car wash tunnel, the driver will remain in the vehicle and the car wash will automatically pull the vehicle through the tunnel. After exiting the tunnel, the vehicles will proceed to either use the vacuum stalls or exit the site via the access drives. Car °'ts Nloutit Pro,sj)ecl, I11111itiois 10 Ir1w OA Page 210 of 455 Circulation through the vacuum stalls will be provided via the two-way drive aisle along the south border of the site. All vehicles will have access to the vacuum stalls before and after utilizing the car wash. Car Wash Stacking Based on a review of the site plan, there will be stacking for a total of approximately 46 vehicles to queue in the three approach lanes from the drive aisle to the entrance of the drive -through system. In addition, approximately six vehicles can be stacked inside the tunnel for a total stacking of 52 vehicles without impacting or blocking external drive aisles. Car Wash Wayf1 - ME The following wayfinding and traffic control signage is recommended: Wayfinding signage should be posted to guide vehicles to the respective car wash stacking area to minimize vehicle turning movements within the internal site circulation area. Wayfinding signage should be posted at the exit of the car wash tunnel to direct vehicles exiting the car wash to either the access drives or the vacuum stalls. A "Do Not Enter" sign should be posted at the exit of the car wash tunnel to deter opposing traffic from entering the car wash tunnel from the one-way exit direction. A stop sign should be provided at the western end of the vacuum stall drive aisles in order to promote free -flow movement for vehicles entering and exiting the site. Nine of the vacuum stalls will be located on the east side of the full -service tunnel and 19 will be located in the middle and eastern portion of the site. A two-way drive aisle will be provided, allowing flexibility for vehicles to access the vacuum area before or after the car wash and vehicles exiting the vacuum stalls to utilize the two-way drive aisle to exit the site. Queue Evaluation Based on information provided to KLOA, Inc. for a similar site, the average car wash processes approximately 100 to 120 vehicles per hour. Below is the maximum number of vehicles that can be processed through the tunnel in one (1) hour. The belt moves 100 feet per minute. Given the tunnel is 140 feet in length, it will take approximately 84 seconds for one vehicle to go through. ® Each vehicle needs 30 feet of space (space between vehicles) P f,'s Page 211 of 455 • Based on the above, approximately 3.33 vehicles can be processed every minute (100 ft/min = 30 ft of space) • Over an hour this would translate into 200 vehicles per hour (3.33 cars X 60 minutes) Regular Operations In order to determine the anticipated queue based on the estimated trips that will be generated by the proposed car wash and the typical service rate, the Poisson Distribution formula was applied assigning random arrivals of vehicles. It is important to note that the Poisson Distribution formula is a discrete probability distribution that models the number of times a random, independent event occurs within a fixed interval of time or space. Examples where the Poisson Distribution formula has been utilized include the number of patients arriving at an emergency room between a specific time, number of cars passing through a toll booth per day and the number of arrivals at a car wash in one hour. Assuming a random arrival rate of 78 vehicles (trip generation for the Saturday midday peak hour), the 95th percentile queue will be between ten to eleven vehicles with a five percent chance of it being longer than eleven vehicles. This calculated queue is very similar to the results of surveys at completed by others at two facilities in Florida and observations completed by KLOA, Inc. at a similar facility in Glen Ellyn, Illinois. As such, the proposed stacking of 46 vehicles will be more than adequate to accommodate the peak hour trip generation and the projected queues during normal/regular day operations. Peak Operations Typical of any car wash, peak operations (design day) normally occur after a weather event such as a snowfall or a rain event. Based on historical data from other car washes, this typically occurs 12 to 15 times per year. During these times, the belt is operated at its maximum service rate (200 vehicles per hour). Taking into account the maximum service rate and applying the Poisson Distribution formula, the car wash will have to experience over 188 inbound vehicles per hour to reach a 95tn percentile queue of 46 vehicles. Based on historical information provided by the operator of a similar facility in Michigan, the highest number of vehicles entering the car wash in one hour was 130 vehicles. Based on this, the maximum hourly inbound trip generation is approximately 30 percent lower than the maximum needed to reach a 46-vehicle queue. As such, the proposed vehicle stacking before the gates coupled with the maximum service rate will be able to accommodate the anticipated maximum hourly trip generation /'- °" 11s A,10tttit Noq)ecll, Illitiois 12 Ir1w OA Page 212 of 455 The directions from which vehicles will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 5 illustrates the directional distribution of the car wash -generated traffic. The estimates of traffic to be generated by the car wash are based upon the proposed land use type and size. The volume of traffic generated for the car wash was estimated using data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition. The "Automated Car Wash" (Land Use Code 948) rate was used. Table 3 tabulates the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday midday vehicle trips anticipated to be generated by the car wash. It should be noted that trips made to car washes are typically diverted from the existing traffic on the roadway system. This is particularly true during the weekday morning and evening peak hours when traffic is diverted from the home -to -work and work -to -home trips. Such diverted trips are referred to as pass -by traffic. However, in order to present a worst -case scenario, no reduction in the site -generated traffic was assumed for this study. r °" its NlOtttit Pro,sj)ect", Illinois 13 114k Ir1w 0A I Page 213 of 455 Table 3 ESTIMATED SITE -GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRIPS ITE Weekday Morning Weekday Evening Saturday Midday Land- T e/Size Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Use Type/Size Code In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total m I Car Kish k 15 Page 215 of 455 The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed car wash. The estimated traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed car wash were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution (Figure 6). The traffic assignment for the development is illustrated in Figure 6. ULM The existing traffic volumes (Figure 4) along the external roadways were increased by a regional growth factor to account for the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not attributable to any particular planned development). Based on ADT projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), the existing traffic volumes are projected to increase by approximately 0.6 percent per year. Therefore, the existing traffic volumes were increased by a total of four percent (one-year buildout plus five years) to represent Year 2031 conditions. A copy of the CMAP projections letter is included in the Appendix. The Year 2031 no -build traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 7. Total Projected Traffic Volumes The car wash -generated traffic was added to the existing traffic volumes accounting for background growth to determine the Year 2031 total projected traffic volumes, as illustrated in Figure 8. Car °'ts Nlotuit Proq)ecl, I11111itiois 16 IrIW OA1114k Page 216 of 455 zW alcn w a7D o u ti �. Lr) Q ti � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII cn %1.0 (V) [V] 4j~ 178 (279) [216] °°IIIII i- 63 (76) [ 96 ] 34 (29) [43]B] t 217 (214) [223] 203 (82) [87] %D o N u Lii u u L�iiflLn � ti O tD r^ �IIIIII KENSINGTON r9 u M `I .Y^i W ti CO 0, L� 34 (29) [431 219 (216) 12261 203 (82) 1871 zW alcn w tD _ M Q u co u � ti �. Ln Q ti cn m CD ko ko 021 Wes-. C" ti cc 1 FA] L0(0)10] �-- 178 (279) 12161 i- 63 (76) [961 KENSINGTON ' FB] KVAD N N O � u u ^ Lo Q �--• .-i �~ ti �- 12 LO .--. N co SITE r� a9 s/ rao 18 (33) [421 T f INN ro r, `ti �aJ � Lo Nammmmm� mmmFc� 1` u u ��V Q� N ��° o�" ro lw J � 0 J� c The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours. The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or modifications are required. Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were performed for the existing (Year 2025) traffic volumes as well as future no -build and total projected (Year 2031) traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 7th Edition and analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic 12 software. The analyses for the traffic -signal controlled intersections were accomplished using actual cycle lengths and phasings to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service. The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing, Year 2031 no -build, and Year 2031 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 4 through 9. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. Cat- Pf"ish Nlount Pt-o,sI)ecl, Illinois 20 0A Page 220 of 455 Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS - US 12 WITH IL 83 - SIGNALIZED F E A A B D D E A Weekday 97.8 71.6 4.0 0.7 13.5 42.1 48.4 70.1 0.1 D - Morning 46.4 E-71.7 A-3.4 C-34.9 E-63.4 F E A A F C E F A _ Weekday y 99+ 66.0 4.8 1.0 98.1 22.1 62.4 83.2 0.1 Evening 45.8 E-66.8 A-4.1 D-42.5 E-77.3 F E A A D C E E A Saturday 96.3 65.1 4.0 1.3 36.2 29.2 57.2 76.9 0.3 D Midday 43.4 E-66.9 A-3.4 C-31.2 E-67.6 F E E D F E A Weekday 97.8 72.9 A 77.3 44.3 81.0 70.7 0.1 D - Morning 2.9 51.9 E-73.0 D-52.6 E-71.2 F E F C F F A _ Weekday 99+ 66.9 98.1 26.1 99+ 84.6 0.1 D Evening 4.2 49.2 E-67.7 D-45.4 F-88.5 -- F E D C F E A _ Saturday 96.9 66.2 A 45.4 30.7 94.3 77.9 0.3 D Midday 2.7 46.9 E-67.9 C-34.9 E-78.5 F E E D F E A - Weekday 97.8 73.2 A 79.6 44.1 81.2 70.7 0.1 D Morning 2.9 52.3 E-73.3 D-53.2 E-71.3 F E F C F F A _ Weekday 99+ 67.3 A 99+ 26.3 99+ 84.6 0.1 D - Evening 4.2 50.1 E-68.1 D-48.2 F-88.8 F E D C F E A _ Saturday 96.9 66.8 A 47.0 30.8 94.6 78.1 0.3 D - Midday 2.7 47.4 E-68.4 D-35.7 E-78.9 Letter denotes Level of Service L - Left Turn R - Right Turn Delay is measured in seconds. T - Through r Kish A£ untProspCect. 21 Page 221 of 455 Table 5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS - US 12 WITH KENSINGTON ROAD - SIGNALIZED Northbound Southbound F A F E A B A Weekday B 96.5 1.3 99+ 70.7 0.3 16.9 1.4 C - Morning 17.4 33.1 E-65.8 E-70.2 A-2.3 F A F F A C A _ Weekday y 99+ 3.1 99+ 80.0 0.6 21.3 1.0 D Evening 24.6 49.8 F - 99+ E - 76.8 A - 2.5 F A F E A B A Saturday C 99+ 1.6 88.4 77.9 1.8 10.6 1.5 D Midday 20.3 42.4 F-88.2 E-69.2 A-2.3 C A F F A F E A B A Weekday 23.7 1.7 91.9 91.8 1.3 99+ 64.9 0.4 15.4 1.2 C - Morning 31.1 B- 17.7 E-62.7 E-65.3 A-2.0 C A F F A F E A B A _ ee ay 29.6 1.7 99+ 99+ 3.3 99+ 68.5 0.7 19.5 0.7 Evening 40.9 C-23.0 E-74.5 E-66.7 A-2.1 -- C A F F A F E A A A _ Saturday 25.6 1.4 99+ 83.8 1.7 88.9 66.4 1.9 8.6 1.0 D Midday 35.1 C-20.6 E-64.3 E-59.9 A-1.7 C A F F A F E A B A - Weekday 24.2 1.7 94.0 91.8 1.3 99+ 64.9 0.4 15.2 1.2 C Morning 31.0 B- 18.1 E-63.3 E-65.3 A-2.0 C A F F A F E A B A _ Weekday 30.7 1.8 99+ 99+ 3.3 99+ 68.5 0.7 19.2 0.7 D - Evening 40.8 C-23.4 E-75.3 E-66.7 A-2.0 C A F F A F E A A A _ Saturday 26.7 1.4 99+ 83.8 1.7 88.9 66.4 1.9 8.3 1.0 D - Midday 35.2 C-21.0 E-66.6 E-59.9 A-1.6 Letter denotes Level of Service L - Left Turn R - Right Turn Delay is measured in seconds. T - Through r Kish A£ untProspCect. 22 Page 222 of 455 Table 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS - IL 83 WITH KENSINGTON ROAD - SIGNALIZED F A D E Weekday 99+ 7.8 A 50.1 72.0 A D - Morning 3.9 2.3 39.6 E-64.1 E-70.3 F A D E _ Weekday99+ 1.5 5 3.1 67.6 D Evening 6.1 2.2 41.1 F - 99+ E - 66.8 F A D E Saturday 967 . 11 . A 456 . . 559 A C Midday 3.5 2.5 31.2 E-72.9 E-55.6 F F A A A D E A A A Weekday 96.5 94.7 9.0 6.4 2.6 50.2 55.7 0.6 2.3 0.4 C - Morning 30.6 E-56.5 A-3.6 D-49.5 A-2.1 F F A A A D E A A A _ Weekday 99+ 99+ 1.6 6.8 3.1 53.1 59.4 0.5 2.1 0.6 Evening 30.5 E-77.5 A-3.9 D-52.5 A- 1.9 -- F F A A A D D A A A _ Saturday 87.8 82.8 1.2 6.6 1.7 45.6 50.5 0.5 2.5 0.5 C Midday 25.5 E-63.2 A-3.2 D-43.3 A-2.3 F F A A A D E A A A - Weekday 96.5 94.8 9.0 6.4 2.6 50.3 56.0 0.6 2.3 0.4 C Morning 30.9 E-56.7 A-3.6 D-49.7 A-2.1 F F A A A D E A A A _ Weekday 99+ 99+ 1.6 6.9 3.1 53.2 59.8 0.5 2.1 0.6 C - Evening 30.9 E-77.9 A-3.9 D-52.7 A- 1.9 F F A A A D D A A A _ Saturday 87 8 82.9 1.2 6.7 1.7 45.8 50.9 0.6 2.5 0.5 C - Midday 26.0 E-63.5 A-3.3 D-43.5 A-2.3 Letter denotes Level of Service L - Left Turn R - Right Turn Delay is measured in seconds. T - Through r Kish A£ untProspCect. 23 Page 223 of 455 Table 7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS EXISTING CONDITIONS — UNSIGNALIZED US 12 with Just Tires/Kimber Automotives North Access Drives • Northeastbound B 12.3 -- -- Approach • Northwestbound Left B 10.7 B 10.5 -- -- Turn • Southeastbound Left B 10.6 Turn • Southwestbound Approach -- -- -- -- -- -- US 12 with Just Tires/Kimber Automotives South Access Drives • Northeastbound C 15.2 C 19.4 B 13.9 Approach • Northwestbound Left B 10.7 B 10.5 B 10.5 Turn Southeastbound Left A 9.3 B 11.1 -- -- Turn Southwestbound C 20.6 C 18.3 C 15.9 Approach LOS = Level of Service 1 — All -way stop control Delay is measured in seconds. 2 — Two-way stop control r °" is A40titit Pro,sj)ectl, Illinois 24 Ir1w 0A N Page 224 of 455 Table 8 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS NO -BUILD PROJECTED CONDITIONS — UNSIGNALIZED US 12 with Just Tires/Kimber Automotives North Access Drives Northeastbound B 12.5 -- -- Approach Northwestbound Left B 11.0 B 10.7 -- -- Turn Southeastbound Left B 10.8 Turn Southwestbound Approach -- -- -- -- -- -- US 12 with Just Tires/Kimber Automotives South Access Drives • Northeastbound C 15.7 C 20.2 B 14.2 Approach • Northwestbound Left B 10.9 B 10.7 B 10.7 Turn Southeastbound A 9.4 B 11.4 -- -- Left Turn Southwestbound C 21.4 C 19.1 C 16.4 Approach LOS = Level of Service 1 — All -way stop control Delay is measured in seconds. 2 — Two-way stop control r °" is A40titit Pro,sj)ectl, Illitiois 25 Ir1w 0A N Page 225 of 455 Table 9 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS TOTAL PROJECTED CONDITIONS — UNSIGNALIZED US 12 with Just Tires/Kimber Automotives North Access Drives • Northeastbound B 12.7 -- -- Approach • Northwestbound Left B 11.0 B 10.8 -- -- Turn Southeastbound Left B 10.8 Turn Southwestbound Approach -- -- -- -- -- -- US 12 with Just Tires/Kimber Automotives South Access Drives • Northeastbound C 15.9 C 20.6 B 14.5 Approach • Northwestbound Left B 11.0 B 10.9 B 10.9 Turn Southeastbound Left A 9.4 B 11.4 -- -- Turn Southwestbound C 21.5 C 19.2 C 16.5 Approach US 12 with Site Access Drive Northeastbound B 15.0 B 14.7 B 15.0 Approach IL 83 with Site Access Drive Westbound Approach B 12.5 B 13.6 B 12.8 LOS = Level of Service 1 — All -way stop control Delay is measured in seconds. 2 — Two-way stop control r °" is A40titit Pro,sj)ectl, Illitiois 26 Ir1w 0A N Page 226 of 455 The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identifies any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development -generated traffic. US 12 (Rand Road) with IL 83 (Main Street)lKensington Road Given the proximity of the signalized intersections of US 12 (Rand Road) with IL 83 (Main Street) and Kensington Road and the signalized intersection of IL 83 with Kensington Road the three intersections operate as a coordinated signal cluster. The close proximity, short roadway segments, and limited intersection capacity result in increased delays and queueing along the external approaches entering the intersection. Furthermore, with limited queue storage on Kensington Road, vehicles waiting to turn left within the intersection can block the progression of traffic through the system. As previously indicated, the Village of Mount Prospect in coordination with the Illinois Department of Transportation are currently in Phase II (right-of-way acquisition) for significant capacity improvements to improve the flow of traffic through these intersections. These improvements include the following: US 12 with IL 83 US 12 will be restriped on the northwestbound approach to provide two through lanes and a shared through/right-turn lane. IL 83 will be widened to provide another exclusive left -turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches. US 12 with Kensington Road US 12 will be widened on the northwestbound approach to provide another through lane. Kensington Road will be widened to provide an exclusive right -turn lane on the eastbound approach and an exclusive left -turn lane on the westbound approach. IL 83 with Kensington Road IL 83 will be widened to provide another through lane and an exclusive right -turn lane on the northbound approach and an exclusive right -turn lane on the southbound approach. Kensington Road will be widened to provide an exclusive left -turn lane on the eastbound and westbound approaches. t- °" its NIW,ira No,sj)eci,", Illinois 27 Ir1w 0A Page 227 of 455 The construction of these improvements is anticipated to begin in Year 2026. Under Year 2031 no -build conditions, assuming the completion of the proposed intersection improvements, the intersections and approaches are projected to operate as follows: The intersection of US 12 with IL 83 is projected to operate at LOS D during the peak hours, US 12 with Kensington Road is projected to operate at LOS C during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS D during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hour, and IL 83 with Kensington Road is projected to operate at LOS C during the peak hours. The southeastbound and southbound approaches at the intersection of US 12 with IL 83 are projected to operate at LOS E during the peak hours except for the southbound approach during the weekday evening peak hour which is projected to operate at LOS F. This is a result of the long cycle length and limited green time assigned to these approaches. The westbound and northwestbound approaches at the intersection of US 12 with Kensington Road are projected to operate at LOS E during all three peak hours. This is a result of the long cycle length and limited green time assigned to these approaches. The eastbound approach at the intersection of IL 83 with Kensington Road is projected to operate at LOS E during the peak hours. This is a result of the long cycle length and limited green time assigned to this approach. Specifically, looking at the Kensington Road approaches at US 12 and IL 83, the delays for the westbound and eastbound approaches, respectively are anticipated to operate with decreased delays. Under Year 2031 total projected conditions, the intersection and critical approaches mentioned above are projected to continue operating at no -build levels of service. Overall, the proposed development is only projected to increase the volume of traffic traversing these intersections by three percent or less during the peak hours. As such, this intersection with the planned improvements have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development. The results of the capacity analyses indicate that observed critical movements at this intersection currently operate at LOS B during the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours. Under no -build and total projected conditions, the critical movements are projected to continue to operate at existing LOS during the peak hours. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway or traffic control improvements are required. r °" its MOurit Pro,sI)ect', Illitiois 28 Ir1w 0A N Page 228 of 455 The results of the capacity analyses indicate that critical movements at this intersection currently operate at LOS C or better during the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours. Under no -build and total projected conditions, the critical movements are projected to continue to operate at existing LOS during the peak hours. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway or traffic control improvements are required. The results of the capacity analyses indicate that with the conversion of this access drive to a right- in/right-out, the northeastbound approach is projected to operate at LOS B during the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours. When this access drive is compared to the right -turn lane guidelines in Chapter 36 of IDOT's Bureau of Design and Environmental Manual (BDE), a southeastbound right -turn lane on US 12 will not be warranted serving this access drive. As such, this intersection will be able to sufficiently accommodate the traffic to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway or traffic control improvements are required. The results of the capacity analyses indicate that with the conversion of this access drive to a right- in/right-out, the westbound approach is projected to operate at LOS B during the peak hours. When this access drive is compared to the right -turn lane guidelines in Chapter 36 of IDOT's Bureau of Design and Environmental Manual (BDE), a northbound right -turn lane on IL 83 will not be warranted serving this access drive. As such, this access drive will be able to sufficiently accommodate the traffic to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway or traffic control improvements are required. r °" its A,10utit Prosj)ecll, Illinois 29 Ir1w 0A N Page 229 of 455 Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been made: The site will be redeveloped into an automatic car wash that consists of one car wash tunnel with 28 vacuum stalls. The traffic that will be generated by the proposed car wash can be accommodated by the area roadway system. The Rand Road Corridor Plan will improve the operations at the triangle intersection between US 12, IL 83, and Kensington Road. These improvements include the following: US 12 with IL 83 US 12 will be restriped on the northwestbound approach to provide two through lanes and a shared through/right-turn lane. IL 83 will be widened to provide another exclusive left -turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches. US 12 with Kensington US 12 will be widened on the northwestbound approach to provide another through lane. Kensington Road will be widened to provide an exclusive right -turn lane on the eastbound approach and an exclusive left -turn lane on the westbound approach. IL 83 with Kensington Road IL IL83 will be widened to provide another through lane and an exclusive right -turn lane on the northbound approach and an exclusive right -turn lane on the southbound approach. Kensington Road will be widened to provide an exclusive left -turn lane on the eastbound and westbound approaches The access drives off US 12 and IL 83 will be converted to right-in/right-out access drives. The proposed site access will be adequate in accommodating the projected traffic volumes entering and exiting the proposed car wash and will ensure efficient and flexible access is provided. Nlotua Pro,sj)ecl, I11111itiois 30 0A Page 230 of 455 Right -turn lanes serving the access drives are not warranted according to the guidelines in Chapter 36 of IDOT's BDE Manual. The proposed stacking provided for the car wash will be able to accommodate the projected demand and is not projected to obstruct internal or external operations. .-Pf,'s Nloutit Nosl,)ecll, Illitiois 31 IrIW OANI t Page 231 of 455 Appendix Traffic Count Summary Sheets Site Plan ITE Trip Generation Sheets CMAP 2050 Projections Letter Level of Service Criteria Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Page 232 of 455 Traffic Count Summary Sheets Page 233 of 455 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: Elmhurst Rd and Kensington TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Westbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:00 AM 0 2 33 15 0 50 0 15 25 0 0 40 0 7 129 20 0 156 0 0 110 14 0 124 37 7:15 AM 0 2 41 24 67 0 15 37 0 0 52 0 6 142 16 U 164 0 0 164 10 0 174 4� 7:30 AM 0 2 43 28 _ 73 0 19 35 0 0 54 0 8 121 12 141 0 0 122 11 _ 133 4( 7:45 AM 0 7 59 45 111 0 18 43 0 - 61 0 12 157 18 0 187 0 0 162 11 0 173 5: Hourly Total 0 13 176 112 301 0 67 140 0 0 207 0 33 549 66 648 0 0 558 46 0 604 17 8:00 AM 0 11 56 76 - 143 1 17 43 0 U 61 0 22 148 20 0 190 0 0 131 21 0 152 5z 8:15 AM 0 10 41 56 0 107 0 11 38 0 49 0 15 143 10 168 0 0 145 19 0 164 4E 8:30 AM 0 5 37 18 0 60 0 15 40 0 55 0 4 139 21 164 0 0 148 15 0 163 4z 8:45 AM 0 4 43 14 61 0 11 35 0 0 46 1 9 123 22 0 155 0 0 150 15 0 165 4' Hourly Total 0 30 177 164 1 371 1 54 156 0 0 211 1 50 553 73 0 677 0 0 574 70 0 644 19 *** BREAK- 4:00 PM 0 5 51 20 1 76 0 20 56 0 0 76 0 18 167 23 U 208 0 0 184 22 _ 206 5E 4:15 PM 0 11 63 17 0 91 0 19 65 0 - 84 0 10 171 17 1 198 0 1 170 19 0 190 5E 4:30 PM 0 4 43 17 0 64 0 19 63 0 82 0 5 145 20 170 0 0 161 21 0 182 4( 4:45 PM 0 9 54 12 75 0 21 67 0 U 88 0 10 169 15 1 194 0 0 158 26 0 184 5z Hourly Total 0 29 211 66 306 0 79 251 0 0 330 0 43 652 75 770 0 1 673 88 0 762 21 5:00 PM 0 8 42 13 0 63 0 21 65 0 0 86 0 9 163 19 191 0 0 212 33 U 245 5E 5:15 PM 0 6 51 25 A82 0 15 70 0 0 85 0 16 185 21 0 222 0 0 172 28 0 200 5E 5:30 PM 0 5 58 29 0 92 0 16 66 0_ 82 0 13 175 36 224 0 0 186 23 0 209 6( 5:45 PM 0 12 57 51 120 0 22 56 0 1 78 0 9 202 27 1 238 0 0 181 27 0 208 6z Hourly Total 0 31 208 118 3 357 0 74 257 0 1 331 0 47 725 103 3 875 0 0 751 111 0 862 24 Grand Total 0 103 772 460 1335 1 274 804 0 1079 1 173 2479 317 2970 0 1 2556 315 0 2872 82 Approach % 0.0 7.7 57.8 34.5 = - 0.1 25.4 74.5 0.0 = - 0.0 5.8 83.5 10.7 = - 0.0 0.0 89.0 11.0 = - - Total % 0.0 1.2 9.4 5.6 = 16.2 0.0 3.3 9.7 0.0 = 13.1 0.0 2.1 30.0 3.8 = 36.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 3.8 = 34.8 - Lights 0 101 764 453 = 1318 1 268 789 0 = 1058 1 168 2386 308 = 2863 0 1 2466 295 = 2762 80 % Lights - 98.1 99.0 98.5 = 98.7 100.0 97.8 98.1 - = 98.1 100.0 97.1 96.2 97.2 = 96.4 - 100.0 96.5 93.7 = 96.2 96 Buses 0 2 2 0 = 4 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 3 29 4 = 36 0 0 30 15 = 45 8 % Buses - 1.9 0.3 0.0 = 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 - = 0.4 0.0 1.7 1.2 1.3 = 1.2 - 0.0 1.2 4.8 = 1.6 1. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 6 7 = 13 0 5 9 0 = 14 0 1 46 3 = 50 0 0 43 3 = 46 1le % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.8 1.5 = 1.0 0.0 1.8 1.1 - = 1.3 0.0 0.6 1.9 0.9 = 1.7 - 0.0 1.7 1.0 = 1.6 1. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 2 0 = 3 0 1 18 2 = 21 0 0 15 1 = 16 4 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 - = 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.6 = 0.7 - 0.0 0.6 0.3 = 0.6 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 2 1 = 3 Page 234 % Bicycles on Road _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.1 0.3 = 0.1 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - 0 - - - - - - 0 - - - - - - - _ - - Page 235 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Count Name: Elmhurst Rd and Kensington TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 3 Start Time U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:45 AM 0 7 59 45 = 111 0 18 43 0 0 61 0 12 157 18 0 187 0 0 162 11 0 173 5� 8:00 AM 0 11 56 76 143 1 17 43 0 0 61 0 22 148 20 U 190 0 0 131 21 0 152 5z 8:15 AM 0 10 41 56 _ 107 0 11 38 0 0 49 0 15 143 10 U 168 0 0 145 19 _ 164 4E 8:30 AM 0 5 37 18 0 60 0 15 40 0 - 55 0 4 139 21 0 164 0 0 148 15 0 163 4z Total 0 33 193 195 - 421 1 61 164 0 226 0 53 587 69 709 0 0 586 66 _ 652 20 Approach % 0.0 7.8 45.8 46.3 = - 0.4 27.0 72.6 0.0 = - 0.0 7.5 82.8 9.7 = - 0.0 0.0 89.9 10.1 = - - Total % 0.0 1.6 9.6 9.7 = 21.0 0.0 3.0 8.2 0.0 = 11.3 0.0 2.6 29.2 3.4 = 35.3 0.0 0.0 29.2 3.3 = 32.5 - PHF 0.000 0.750 0.818 0.641 = 0.736 0.250 0.847 0.953 0.000 = 0.926 0.000 0.602 0.935 0.821 = 0.933 0.000 0.000 0.904 0.786 = 0.942 0.9 Lights 0 31 191 189 = 411 1 59 160 0 = 220 0 49 552 68 = 669 0 0 544 57 = 601 19 % Lights - 93.9 99.0 96.9 = 97.6 100.0 96.7 97.6 - = 97.3 - 92.5 94.0 98.6 = 94.4 - - 92.8 86.4 = 92.2 94 Buses 0 2 0 0 = 2 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 3 5 0 = 8 0 0 18 8 = 26 3 % Buses - 6.1 0.0 0.0 = 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 - = 0.4 - 5.7 0.9 0.0 = 1.1 - - 3.1 12.1 = 4.0 1. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 2 6 = 8 0 2 3 0 = 5 0 0 23 1 = 24 0 0 21 1 = 22 5 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 1.0 3.1 = 1.9 0.0 3.3 1.8 - = 2.2 - 0.0 3.9 1.4 = 3.4 - - 3.6 1.5 = 3.4 2. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 7 0 = 8 0 0 2 0 = 2 1 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 1.9 1.2 0.0 = 1.1 - - 0.3 0.0 = 0.3 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 1 % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.2 0.0 = 0.2 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - L - - % Pedestrians - - - - -- Page 236 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Count Name: Elmhurst Rd and Kensington TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 4 Start Time U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 4:45 PM 0 9 54 12 0 75 0 21 67 0 0 88 0 10 169 15 194 0 0 158 26 0 184 5z 5:00 PM 0 8 42 13 0 63 0 21 65 0 0 86 0 9 163 19 U 191 0 0 212 33 0 245 5E 5:15 PM 0 6 51 25 1 82 0 15 70 0 0 85 0 16 185 21 U 222 0 0 172 28 _ 200 5E 5:30 PM 0 5 58 29 0 92 0 16 66 0 - 82 0 13 175 36 224 0 0 186 23 0 209 6( Total 0 28 205 79 - 312 0 73 268 0 341 0 48 692 91 a 831 0 0 728 110 0 838 23 Approach % 0.0 9.0 65.7 25.3 = - 0.0 21.4 78.6 0.0 = - 0.0 5.8 83.3 11.0 = - 0.0 0.0 86.9 13.1 = - - Total % 0.0 1.2 8.8 3.4 = 13.4 0.0 3.1 11.5 0.0 = 14.7 0.0 2.1 29.8 3.9 = 35.8 0.0 0.0 31.4 4.7 = 36.1 - PHF 0.000 0.778 0.884 0.681 = 0.848 0.000 0.869 0.957 0.000 = 0.969 0.000 0.750 0.935 0.632 = 0.927 0.000 0.000 0.858 0.833 = 0.855 0.9 Lights 0 28 203 78 = 309 0 73 266 0 = 339 0 48 683 90 = 821 0 0 718 107 = 825 22 % Lights - 100.0 99.0 98.7 = 99.0 - 100.0 99.3 - = 99.4 - 100.0 98.7 98.9 = 98.8 - - 98.6 97.3 = 98.4 98 Buses 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 1 = 2 0 0 2 1 = 3 E % Buses - 0.0 0.5 0.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.1 1.1 = 0.2 - - 0.3 0.9 = 0.4 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 1 1 = 2 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 3 0 = 3 f % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.5 1.3 = 0.6 - 0.0 0.4 - = 0.3 - 0.0 0.3 0.0 = 0.2 - - 0.4 0.0 = 0.4 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 6 0 = 6 0 0 5 1 = 6 1 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.4 - = 0.3 - 0.0 0.9 0.0 = 0.7 - - 0.7 0.9 = 0.7 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 1 = 1 1 % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.9 = 0.1 0. Pedestrians - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -0 - - ° ° Pedestrians - - - - --_ � 0 - - - - - = - - - - - - -00-- �� Page 237 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: Rand Rd and West Access TM( Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Access rd Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left access rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:00 AM 0 0 211 0 0 211 0 0 127 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,� 7:15 AM 0 0 231 0 0 231 0 1 135 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3E 7:30 AM 0 0 281 0 _ 281 0 0 165 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 4z 7:45 AM 0 0 244 2 0 246 1 1 174 0 - 176 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4'e Hourly Total 0 0 967 2 0 969 1 2 601 0 0 604 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 8:00 AM 0 0 233 3 236 0 0 178 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 8:15 AM 0 0 269 1 0 270 0 0 143 0 - 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 8:30 AM 0 0 250 0 0 250 0 1 203 0 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4E 8:45 AM 0 0 201 0 201 0 0 164 0 0 164 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3E Hourly Total 0 0 953 4 0 957 0 1 688 0 0 689 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16. *** BREAK- 4:00 PM 0 0 205 0 _ 205 0 0 268 0 0 268 0 0 0 1 U 1 0 0 0 0 _ 0 4-1 4:15 PM 0 0 185 0 0 185 0 0 253 0 - 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4; 4:30 PM 0 0 221 1 _ 222 0 0 233 0 - 233 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 4E 4:45 PM 0 0 240 0 240 0 0 267 0 U 267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5( Hourly Total 0 0 851 1 0 852 0 0 1021 0 0 1021 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 5:00 PM 0 0 251 0 - 251 0 0 253 0 - 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5( 5:15 PM 0 0 233 0 233 0 0 297 0 0 297 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5( 5:30 PM 0 0 240 0 0 240 1 1 218 0 - 220 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4E 5:45 PM 0 0 199 0 0 199 0 1 244 0 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4z Hourly Total 0 0 923 0 0 923 1 2 1012 0 0 1015 0 0 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 19 Grand Total 0 0 3694 7 0 3701 2 5 3322 0 - 3329 0 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 Approach % 0.0 0.0 99.8 0.2 = - 0.1 0.2 99.8 0.0 = - 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 = - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 52.5 0.1 = 52.6 0.0 0.1 47.2 0.0 = 47.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - Lights 0 0 3621 7 = 3628 2 5 3249 0 = 3256 0 0 0 2 = 2 0 0 0 0 = 0 68 % Lights - - 98.0 100.0 = 98.0 100.0 100.0 97.8 - = 97.8 - - - 100.0 = 100.0 - - - - = - 97 Buses 0 0 7 0 = 7 0 0 8 0 = 8 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Buses - - 0.2 0.0 = 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 - = 0.2 - - - 0.0 = 0.0 - - - - = - 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 43 0 = 43 0 0 40 0 = 40 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 8 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 1.2 0.0 = 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 - = 1.2 - - - 0.0 = 0.0 - - - - = - 1. Articulated Trucks 0 0 23 0 = 23 0 0 24 0 = 24 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 4 % Articulated Trucks - - 0.6 0.0 = 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 - = 0.7 - - - 0.0 = 0.0 - - - - = - 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 Page 238 % Bicycles on Road _ _ 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - - - 0.0 = 0.0 - - - - = - 0. Pedestrians - - - -0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians I - - - - _ - I - - - - _ - I - - - - -- - - - - - = - - Page 239 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Count Name: Rand Rd and West Access TM( Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 3 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Access rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left access rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:45 AM 0 0 244 2 0 246 1 1 174 0 0 176 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4e 8:00 AM 0 0 233 3 0 236 0 0 178 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 8:15 AM 0 0 269 1 _ 270 0 0 143 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 41 8:30 AM 0 0 250 0 0 250 0 1 203 0 - 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4Ir Total 0 0 996 6 _ 1002 1 2 698 0 - 701 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 17 Approach % 0.0 0.0 99.4 0.6 = - 0.1 0.3 99.6 0.0 = - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 58.5 0.4 = 58.8 0.1 0.1 41.0 0.0 = 41.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - PHF 0.000 0.000 0.926 0.500 = 0.928 0.250 0.500 0.860 0.000 = 0.859 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 = 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 = 0.000 0.9 Lights 0 0 977 6 = 983 1 2 670 0 = 673 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 16 % Lights - - 98.1 100.0 = 98.1 100.0 100.0 96.0 - = 96.0 - - - - = - - - - - = - 97 Buses 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 z % Buses - - 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 - = 0.4 - - - - _ - - - - - _ - 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 13 0 = 13 0 0 15 0 = 15 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 2 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 1.3 0.0 = 1.3 0.0 0.0 2.1 - = 2.1 - - - - = - - - - - = - 1. Articulated Trucks 0 0 5 0 = 5 0 0 9 0 = 9 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1. % Articulated Trucks - - 0.5 0.0 = 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 - = 1.3 - - - - = - - - - - = - 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 - = 0.1 - - - - = - - - - - = - 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - = - - - - - = - - - - - = - i - - - - _ - - Page 240 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Count Name: Rand Rd and West Access TM( Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 4 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Access rd Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left access rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 4:45 PM 0 0 240 0 0 240 0 0 267 0 0 267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5( 5:00 PM 0 0 251 0 0 251 0 0 253 0 0 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5( 5:15 PM 0 0 233 0 _ 233 0 0 297 0 0 297 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 5� 5:30 PM 0 0 240 0 0 240 1 1 218 0 - 220 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4E Total 0 0 964 0 0 964 1 1 1035 0 1037 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Approach % 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 = - 0.1 0.1 99.8 0.0 = - 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 = - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 = 48.2 0.0 0.0 51.7 0.0 = 51.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - PHF 0.000 0.000 0.960 0.000 = 0.960 0.250 0.250 0.871 0.000 = 0.873 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 = 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 = 0.000 0.9 Lights 0 0 950 0 = 950 1 1 1028 0 = 1030 0 0 0 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 19 % Lights - - 98.5 - = 98.5 100.0 100.0 99.3 - = 99.3 - - - 100.0 = 100.0 - - - - = - 99 Buses 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 % Buses - - 0.2 - = 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - - - 0.0 = 0.0 - - - - = - 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 9 0 = 9 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 0.9 - = 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 - = 0.4 - - - 0.0 = 0.0 - - - - = - 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 E % Articulated Trucks - - 0.3 - = 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 - = 0.3 - - - 0.0 = 0.0 - - - - = - 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 - = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - - - 0.0 = 0.0 - - - - = - 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - ° Pedestrians - - - - = - - - - - = - - - - - - -00 -0 - - - - - - - - - Page 241 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: Rand+Rd+and+Kensington+Rd TMC 3 Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left kenigston rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left kenigston rd Westbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:00 AM 0 0 46 11 0 57 0 6 42 16 0 64 1 7 115 2 0 125 0 13 191 0 - 204 4E 7:15 AM 0 0 79 7 0 86 0 4 43 15 - 62 0 19 133 7 U 159 0 7 213 0 0 220 5e 7:30 AM 0 1 50 9 _ 60 0 2 31 15 0 48 0 31 144 8 U 183 0 11 255 0 _ 266 5E 7:45 AM 0 0 77 16 0 93 0 4 57 23 - 84 0 20 187 8 0 215 0 13 218 0 0 231 6'e Hourly Total 0 1 252 43 0 296 0 16 173 69 0 258 1 77 579 25 0 682 0 44 877 0 0 921 21 8:00 AM 0 0 48 26 74 0 5 33 23 0 61 0 23 145 9 0 177 0 11 238 0 0 249 5E 8:15 AM 0 0 36 18 054 0 1 31 15 - 47 0 13 126 10 0 149 0 13 271 0 0 284 5� 8:30 AM 0 0 46 17 0 63 0 4 39 22 - 65 0 16 172 12 200 0 23 235 0 0 258 5E 8:45 AM 0 0 49 16 65 0 4 41 18 0 63 0 8 139 14 - 161 0 16 174 0 0 190 47 Hourly Total 0 0 179 77 0 256 0 14 144 78 0 236 0 60 582 45 1 687 0 63 918 0 0 981 21 *** BREAK- 4:00 PM 0 0 60 18 _ 78 0 5 64 26 0 95 0 19 220 19 U 258 0 19 179 0 _ 198 62 4:15 PM 0 0 57 20 0 77 0 5 66 30 101 0 18 208 23 1 249 0 13 164 0 0 177 6( 4:30 PM 0 0 49 15 0 64 0 2 66 24 - 92 0 16 208 15 - 239 0 14 218 0 - 232 6'e 4:45 PM 0 0 51 18 69 0 3 70 36 0 109 0 18 241 20 0 279 0 18 222 0 0 240 6E Hourly Total 0 0 217 71 0 288 0 15 266 116 397 0 71 877 77 1 1025 0 64 783 0 0 847 25 5:00 PM 0 0 46 19 - 65 0 3 68 29 100 0 15 220 12 247 0 19 227 0 0 246 6E 5:15 PM 0 0 59 12 71 0 8 53 33 0 94 0 30 261 17 - 308 0 15 216 0 0 231 7( 5:30 PM 0 0 70 22 0 92 0 8 74 33 - 115 0 10 217 18 0 245 0 18 211 0 - 229 6E 5:45 PM 0 0 79 15 0 94 0 7 63 23 - 93 0 20 216 18 254 0 15 182 0 0 197 6( Hourly Total 0 0 254 68 0 322 0 26 258 118 1 402 0 75 914 65 9 1054 0 67 836 0 - 903 26 Grand Total 0 1 902 259 0 1162 0 71 841 381 1293 1 283 2952 212 4 3448 0 238 3414 0 0 3652 95 Approach % 0.0 0.1 77.6 22.3 = - 0.0 5.5 65.0 29.5 = - 0.0 8.2 85.6 6.1 = - 0.0 6.5 93.5 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 9.4 2.7 = 12.2 0.0 0.7 8.8 4.0 = 13.5 0.0 3.0 30.9 2.2 = 36.1 0.0 2.5 35.7 0.0 = 38.2 - Lights 0 1 889 255 = 1145 0 70 825 367 = 1262 1 280 2886 210 = 3377 0 232 3342 0 = 3574 93 % Lights - 100.0 98.6 98.5 = 98.5 - 98.6 98.1 96.3 = 97.6 100.0 98.9 97.8 99.1 = 97.9 - 97.5 97.9 - = 97.9 97 Buses 0 0 5 1 = 6 0 0 4 1 = 5 0 0 7 0 = 7 0 1 4 0 = 5 2 % Buses - 0.0 0.6 0.4 = 0.5 - 0.0 0.5 0.3 = 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.2 - 0.4 0.1 - = 0.1 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 7 2 = 9 0 1 11 5 = 17 0 2 35 2 = 39 0 2 50 0 = 52 11 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.8 0.8 = 0.8 - 1.4 1.3 1.3 = 1.3 0.0 0.7 1.2 0.9 = 1.1 - 0.8 1.5 - = 1.4 1. Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 1 = 2 0 0 1 8 = 9 0 1 23 0 = 24 0 3 17 0 = 20 5 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.1 0.4 = 0.2 - 0.0 0.1 2.1 = 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.0 = 0.7 - 1.3 0.5 - = 0.5 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 1 Page 242 % Bicycles on Road _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - -0 - - - - - a - - - - - 4 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians I - - - - _ - I - - - - 00 -- - I - - - - . -0 -- - I - - - - _ - - Page 243 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Count Name: Rand+Rd+and+Kensington+Rd TMC 3 Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 3 Start Time U-Turn Left kenigston rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left kenigston rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:45 AM 0 0 77 16 0 93 0 4 57 23 0 84 0 20 187 8 0 215 0 13 218 0 0 231 6e 8:00 AM 0 0 48 26 0 74 0 5 33 23 0 61 0 23 145 9 U 177 0 11 238 0 0 249 5E 8:15 AM 0 0 36 18 _ 54 0 1 31 15 0 47 0 13 126 10 - 149 0 13 271 0 _ 284 5� 8:30 AM 0 0 46 17 0 63 0 4 39 22 - 65 0 16 172 12 0 200 0 23 235 0 0 258 5E Total 0 0 207 77 0 284 0 14 160 83 - 257 0 72 630 39 - 741 0 60 962 0 0 1022 23 Approach % 0.0 0.0 72.9 27.1 = - 0.0 5.4 62.3 32.3 = - 0.0 9.7 85.0 5.3 = - 0.0 5.9 94.1 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 9.0 3.3 = 12.3 0.0 0.6 6.9 3.6 = 11.2 0.0 3.1 27.3 1.7 = 32.2 0.0 2.6 41.8 0.0 = 44.4 - PHF 0.000 0.000 0.672 0.740 = 0.763 0.000 0.700 0.702 0.902 = 0.765 0.000 0.783 0.842 0.813 = 0.862 0.000 0.652 0.887 0.000 = 0.900 0.9 Lights 0 0 203 76 = 279 0 14 154 80 = 248 0 71 600 38 = 709 0 59 942 0 = 1001 22 % Lights - - 98.1 98.7 = 98.2 - 100.0 96.3 96.4 = 96.5 - 98.6 95.2 97.4 = 95.7 - 98.3 97.9 - = 97.9 97 Buses 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 0 1 0 = 1 E % Buses - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.6 0.0 = 0.4 - 0.0 0.6 0.0 = 0.5 - 0.0 0.1 - = 0.1 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 4 1 = 5 0 0 5 1 = 6 0 1 18 1 = 20 0 0 13 0 = 13 4. % Single -Unit Trucks - - 1.9 1.3 = 1.8 - 0.0 3.1 1.2 = 2.3 - 1.4 2.9 2.6 = 2.7 - 0.0 1.4 - = 1.3 1. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 2 = 2 0 0 7 0 = 7 0 1 6 0 = 7 1 % Articulated Trucks - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 2.4 = 0.8 - 0.0 1.1 0.0 = 0.9 - 1.7 0.6 - = 0.7 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians Page 244 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Count Name: Rand+Rd+and+Kensington+Rd TMC 3 Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 4 Start Time U-Turn Left kenigston rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left kenigston rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 4:45 PM 0 0 51 18 0 69 0 3 70 36 0 109 0 18 241 20 0 279 0 18 222 0 0 240 6C, 5:00 PM 0 0 46 19 0 65 0 3 68 29 1 100 0 15 220 12 U 247 0 19 227 0 0 246 6� 5:15 PM 0 0 59 12 _ 71 0 8 53 33 0 94 0 30 261 17 U 308 0 15 216 0 _ 231 7( 5:30 PM 0 0 70 22 0 92 0 8 74 33 - 115 0 10 217 18 0 245 0 18 211 0 0 229 6E Total 0 0 226 71 0 297 0 22 265 131 418 0 73 939 67 - 1079 0 70 876 0 0 946 27. Approach % 0.0 0.0 76.1 23.9 = - 0.0 5.3 63.4 31.3 = - 0.0 6.8 87.0 6.2 = - 0.0 7.4 92.6 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 8.2 2.6 = 10.8 0.0 0.8 9.7 4.8 = 15.3 0.0 2.7 34.3 2.4 = 39.4 0.0 2.6 32.0 0.0 = 34.5 - PHF 0.000 0.000 0.807 0.807 = 0.807 0.000 0.688 0.895 0.910 = 0.909 0.000 0.608 0.899 0.838 = 0.876 0.000 0.921 0.965 0.000 = 0.961 0.9 Lights 0 0 225 71 = 296 0 22 264 128 = 414 0 72 934 66 = 1072 0 69 862 0 = 931 27 % Lights - - 99.6 100.0 = 99.7 - 100.0 99.6 97.7 = 99.0 - 98.6 99.5 98.5 = 99.4 - 98.6 98.4 - = 98.4 99 Buses 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 1 0 = 2 z % Buses - - 0.4 0.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.0 0.8 = 0.2 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 1.4 0.1 - = 0.2 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 2 = 3 0 0 3 1 = 4 0 0 8 0 = 8 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.4 1.5 = 0.7 - 0.0 0.3 1.5 = 0.4 - 0.0 0.9 - = 0.8 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 2 0 = 3 0 0 4 0 = 4 % Articulated Trucks - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 1.4 0.2 0.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.5 - = 0.4 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 1 % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.1 - = 0.1 0. Pedestrians - - - - F - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - = - - - - - - _ _ -- - - - - - = - Page 245 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: US 12 Rand and Access Dr Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left access dr Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left access dr Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:00 AM 0 0 213 0 0 213 0 0 132 1 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3z 7:15 AM 0 0 230 0 0 230 0 0 140 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7:30 AM 0 0 283 0 _ 283 0 0 186 1 0 187 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 4� 7:45 AM 0 1 244 0 245 1 1 184 2 - 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4; Hourly Total 0 1 970 0 0 971 1 1 642 4 0 648 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8:00 AM 0 0 246 2 248 0 0 177 0 0 177 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 42 8:15 AM 0 0 280 0 0 280 0 0 144 1 - 145 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4'e 8:30 AM 0 1 261 0 0 262 1 0 200 2 203 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 4E 8:45 AM 0 2 207 1 210 0 0 161 1 0 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 37 Hourly Total 0 3 994 3 1 1000 1 0 682 4 0 687 0 1 0 4 2 5 0 1 0 1 0 2 16 *** BREAK- 4:00 PM 0 1 211 0 _ 212 0 1 266 2 0 269 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 1 0 0 _ 1 4E 4:15 PM 0 0 189 0 0 189 0 0 246 4 - 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4z 4:30 PM 0 3 226 1 0 230 0 0 239 3 - 242 0 1 0 2 - 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 47 4:45 PM 0 1 230 0 231 0 0 266 3 U 269 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 5( Hourly Total 0 5 856 1 0 862 0 1 1017 12 0 1030 0 2 0 2 4 0 1 0 5 0 6 19 5:00 PM 0 0 250 0 0 250 0 0 259 0 - 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 51 5:15 PM 0 0 232 0 232 0 0 293 0 0 293 0 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5Id 5:30 PM 0 0 238 0 0 238 0 2 236 0 - 238 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 47 5:45 PM 0 0 197 0 0 197 0 1 242 0 0 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4z Hourly Total 0 0 917 0 0 917 0 3 1030 0 0 1033 0 0 1 1 9 2 0 1 0 1 - 2 19 Grand Total 0 9 3737 4 - 3750 2 5 3371 20 - 3398 0 3 1 7 4 11 0 3 0 7 0 10 71 Approach % 0.0 0.2 99.7 0.1 = - 0.1 0.1 99.2 0.6 = - 0.0 27.3 9.1 63.6 = - 0.0 30.0 0.0 70.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.1 52.1 0.1 = 52.3 0.0 0.1 47.0 0.3 = 47.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 = 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 = 0.1 - Lights 0 9 3672 4 = 3685 2 5 3290 20 = 3317 0 3 1 7 = 11 0 3 0 7 = 10 70 % Lights - 100.0 98.3 100.0 = 98.3 100.0 100.0 97.6 100.0 = 97.6 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 = 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 = 100.0 98 Buses 0 0 5 0 = 5 0 0 8 0 = 8 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Buses - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.2 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 40 0 = 40 0 0 44 0 = 44 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 8. % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 1.1 0.0 = 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 = 1.3 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 1. Articulated Trucks 0 0 20 0 = 20 0 0 27 0 = 27 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 4 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.5 0.0 = 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 = 0.8 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 Page 246 % Bicycles on Road _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4 - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - - - - I - - - - = - - - - - 100- - - I - - - - _ - - Page 247 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Count Name: US 12 Rand and Access Dr Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 3 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left access dr Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left access dr Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:45 AM 0 1 244 0 0 245 1 1 184 2 0 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 8:00 AM 0 0 246 2 0 248 0 0 177 0 0 177 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4e 8:15 AM 0 0 280 0 _ 280 0 0 144 1 0 145 0 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 42 8:30 AM 0 1 261 0 0 262 1 0 200 2 - 203 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 4E Total 0 2 1031 2 _ 1035 2 1 705 5 - 713 0 1 0 4 - 5 0 1 0 0 _ 1 17 Approach % 0.0 0.2 99.6 0.2 = - 0.3 0.1 98.9 0.7 = - 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 = - 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.1 58.8 0.1 = 59.0 0.1 0.1 40.2 0.3 = 40.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 = 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 = 0.1 - PHF 0.000 0.500 0.921 0.250 = 0.924 0.500 0.250 0.881 0.625 = 0.878 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.333 = 0.417 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 = 0.250 0.9 Lights 0 2 1016 2 = 1020 2 1 675 5 = 683 0 1 0 4 = 5 0 1 0 0 = 1 17 % Lights - 100.0 98.5 100.0 = 98.6 100.0 100.0 95.7 100.0 = 95.8 - 100.0 - 100.0 = 100.0 - 100.0 - - = 100.0 97 Buses 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 % Buses - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 = 0.4 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - - = 0.0 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 10 0 = 10 0 0 17 0 = 17 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 2 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 1.0 0.0 = 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 = 2.4 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - - = 0.0 1. Articulated Trucks 0 0 5 0 = 5 0 0 9 0 = 9 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1. % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.5 0.0 = 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 = 1.3 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - - = 0.0 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - - = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians Page 248 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Count Name: US 12 Rand and Access Dr Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 4 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left access dr Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left access dr Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 4:45 PM 0 1 230 0 0 231 0 0 266 3 0 269 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 5( 5:00 PM 0 0 250 0 0 250 0 0 259 0 0 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 51 5:15 PM 0 0 232 0 _ 232 0 0 293 0 0 293 0 0 0 1 U 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 52 5:30 PM 0 0 238 0 0 238 0 2 236 0 - 238 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-1 Total 0 1 950 0 0 951 0 2 1054 3 - 1059 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 0 2 0 3 20 Approach % 0.0 0.1 99.9 0.0 = - 0.0 0.2 99.5 0.3 = - 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 = - 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 47.1 0.0 = 47.2 0.0 0.1 52.3 0.1 = 52.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 = 0.1 - PHF 0.000 0.250 0.950 0.000 = 0.951 0.000 0.250 0.899 0.250 = 0.904 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.250 = 0.750 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.250 = 0.375 0.9 Lights 0 1 937 0 = 938 0 2 1044 3 = 1049 0 1 1 1 = 3 0 1 0 2 = 3 19 % Lights - 100.0 98.6 - = 98.6 - 100.0 99.1 100.0 = 99.1 - 100.0 100.0 100.0 = 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 = 100.0 98 Buses 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 % Buses - 0.0 0.2 - = 0.2 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 8 0 = 8 0 0 6 0 = 6 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1. % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.8 - = 0.8 - 0.0 0.6 0.0 = 0.6 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 E % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.3 - = 0.3 - 0.0 0.3 0.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 0 - - ° Pedestrians - - - - = - - - - - = - - - - - - -00 -0 - - - - - - - - - Page 249 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: US-12+Rand+and+IL- 83+Elmhurst+Rd TMC 3 Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:00 AM 0 3 176 38 0 217 0 0 105 26 0 131 0 30 95 0 0 125 0 31 81 6 0 118 5c. 7:15 AM 0 3 199 41 243 0 0 123 19 0 142 0 31 103 0 134 0 21 128 2 151 6 7:30 AM 0 0 216 39 _ 255 0 0 129 34 0 163 0 41 90 0 U 131 0 37 110 6 _ 153 7( 7:45 AM 0 2 202 36 0 240 0 0 168 28 - 196 0 41 122 0 0 163 0 29 119 6 0 154 7Ir Hourly Total 0 8 793 154 1 955 0 0 525 107 0 632 0 143 410 0 0 553 0 118 438 20 0 576 27 8:00 AM 0 0 192 48 - 240 0 0 138 21 0 159 0 35 120 0 0 155 0 41 102 4 1 147 7( 8:15 AM 0 1 226 44 0 271 0 0 109 27 - 136 0 36 124 0 160 0 39 111 5 0 155 7'e 8:30 AM 0 2 218 50 0 270 0 0 161 44 - 205 0 43 95 0 138 0 26 107 1 0 134 7z 8:45 AM 0 4 180 51 235 0 0 140 33 0 173 0 34 101 0 - 135 0 38 108 2 0 148 6( Hourly Total 0 7 816 193 2 1016 0 0 548 125 0 673 0 148 440 0 0 588 0 144 428 12 1 584 28 *** BREAK- 4:00 PM 0 8 149 54 _ 211 0 0 226 38 0 264 0 43 104 0 0 147 0 58 139 5 _ 202 82 4:15 PM 0 8 135 41 0 184 0 0 188 48 - 236 0 48 107 0 0 155 0 41 133 7 0 181 7Ir 4:30 PM 0 5 192 42 - 239 0 0 202 37 - 239 0 38 103 0 - 141 0 38 134 6 - 178 7( 4:45 PM 0 4 197 34 235 0 0 214 63 0 277 0 52 113 0 0 165 0 34 147 9 190 8E Hourly Total 0 25 673 171 869 0 0 830 186 0 1016 0 181 427 0 608 0 171 553 27 0 751 32. 5:00 PM 0 6 195 48 - 249 0 0 205 49 - 254 0 38 126 0 164 0 45 178 4 0 227 8( 5:15 PM 0 5 198 52 255 0 0 251 34 0 285 0 45 137 1 - 183 0 40 138 2 0 180 9( 5:30 PM 0 7 150 53 0 210 0 0 193 51 - 244 0 45 115 0 0 160 0 44 139 1 184 7( 5:45 PM 0 3 143 48 194 0 0 217 40 0 257 0 51 119 0 U 170 0 50 157 7 0 214 81 Hourly Total 0 21 686 201 3 908 0 0 866 174 0 1040 0 179 497 1 0 677 0 179 612 14 - 805 34 Grand Total 0 61 2968 719 1 3748 0 0 2769 592 - 3361 0 651 1774 1 0 2426 0 612 2031 73 - 2716 12e Approach % 0.0 1.6 79.2 19.2 = - 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 = - 0.0 26.8 73.1 0.0 = - 0.0 22.5 74.8 2.7 = - - Total % 0.0 0.5 24.2 5.9 = 30.6 0.0 0.0 22.6 4.8 = 27.4 0.0 5.3 14.5 0.0 = 19.8 0.0 5.0 16.6 0.6 = 22.2 - Lights 0 60 2907 705 = 3672 0 0 2708 571 = 3279 0 638 1703 1 = 2342 0 601 1944 67 = 2612 11� % Lights - 98.4 97.9 98.1 = 98.0 - - 97.8 96.5 = 97.6 - 98.0 96.0 100.0 = 96.5 - 98.2 95.7 91.8 = 96.2 97 Buses 0 0 4 8 = 12 0 0 6 1 = 7 0 6 18 0 = 24 0 0 33 1 = 34 7 % Buses - 0.0 0.1 1.1 = 0.3 - - 0.2 0.2 = 0.2 - 0.9 1.0 0.0 = 1.0 - 0.0 1.6 1.4 = 1.3 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 1 43 5 = 49 0 0 33 9 = 42 0 6 42 0 = 48 0 7 38 3 = 48 1E % Single -Unit Trucks - 1.6 1.4 0.7 = 1.3 - - 1.2 1.5 = 1.2 - 0.9 2.4 0.0 = 2.0 - 1.1 1.9 4.1 = 1.8 1. Articulated Trucks 0 0 14 1 = 15 0 0 22 11 = 33 0 1 11 0 = 12 0 4 14 2 = 20 8 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.5 0.1 = 0.4 - - 0.8 1.9 = 1.0 - 0.2 0.6 0.0 = 0.5 - 0.7 0.7 2.7 = 0.7 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 2 0 = 2 Page 250 % Bicycles on Road _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 - - - - - - - - o Pedestrians - - - - Page 251 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Count Name: US-12+Rand+and+IL- 83+Elmhurst+Rd TMC 3 Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 3 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 7:45 AM 0 2 202 36 0 240 0 0 168 28 0 196 0 41 122 0 0 163 0 29 119 6 0 154 7,r 8:00 AM 0 0 192 48 240 0 0 138 21 0 159 0 35 120 0 U 155 0 41 102 4 1 147 7( 8:15 AM 0 1 226 44 _ 271 0 0 109 27 0 136 0 36 124 0 - 160 0 39 111 5 _ 155 72 8:30 AM 0 2 218 50 0 270 0 0 161 44 - 205 0 43 95 0 0 138 0 26 107 1 0 134 7z Total 0 5 838 178 s 1021 0 0 576 120 - 696 0 155 461 0 - 616 0 135 439 16 - 590 29 Approach % 0.0 0.5 82.1 17.4 = - 0.0 0.0 82.8 17.2 = - 0.0 25.2 74.8 0.0 = - 0.0 22.9 74.4 2.7 = - - Total % 0.0 0.2 28.7 6.1 = 34.9 0.0 0.0 19.7 4.1 = 23.8 0.0 5.3 15.8 0.0 = 21.1 0.0 4.6 15.0 0.5 = 20.2 - PHF 0.000 0.625 0.927 0.890 = 0.942 0.000 0.000 0.857 0.682 = 0.849 0.000 0.901 0.929 0.000 = 0.945 0.000 0.823 0.922 0.667 = 0.952 0.9 Lights 0 5 820 171 = 996 0 0 553 111 = 664 0 148 432 0 = 580 0 133 398 13 = 544 27 % Lights - 100.0 97.9 96.1 = 97.6 - - 96.0 92.5 = 95.4 - 95.5 93.7 - = 94.2 - 98.5 90.7 81.3 = 92.2 95 Buses 0 0 0 6 = 6 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 2 1 0 = 3 0 0 16 1 = 17 2 % Buses - 0.0 0.0 3.4 = 0.6 - - 0.5 0.0 = 0.4 - 1.3 0.2 - = 0.5 - 0.0 3.6 6.3 = 2.9 1. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 16 1 = 17 0 0 15 5 = 20 0 5 24 0 = 29 0 1 22 1 = 24 9 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 1.9 0.6 = 1.7 - - 2.6 4.2 = 2.9 - 3.2 5.2 - = 4.7 - 0.7 5.0 6.3 = 4.1 3. Articulated Trucks 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 5 4 = 9 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 1 3 1 = 5 2 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.2 - - 0.9 3.3 = 1.3 - 0.0 0.9 - = 0.6 - 0.7 0.7 6.3 = 0.8 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - - - ° ° Pedestrians - - - - 0 _ - -�-� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U _ ��-r - - Page 252 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Count Name: US-12+Rand+and+IL- 83+Elmhurst+Rd TMC 3 Site Code: Start Date: 09/30/2025 Page No: 4 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 4:45 PM 0 4 197 34 0 235 0 0 214 63 0 277 0 52 113 0 0 165 0 34 147 9 0 190 8E 5:00 PM 0 6 195 48 0 249 0 0 205 49 0 254 0 38 126 0 U 164 0 45 178 4 0 227 8� 5:15 PM 0 5 198 52 1 255 0 0 251 34 0 285 0 45 137 1 - 183 0 40 138 2 _ 180 9( 5:30 PM 0 7 150 53 0 210 0 0 193 51 - 244 0 45 115 0 0 160 0 44 139 1 0 184 7c. Total 0 22 740 187 - 949 0 0 863 197 - 1060 0 180 491 1 - 672 0 163 602 16 0 781 34 Approach % 0.0 2.3 78.0 19.7 = - 0.0 0.0 81.4 18.6 = - 0.0 26.8 73.1 0.1 = - 0.0 20.9 77.1 2.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.6 21.4 5.4 = 27.4 0.0 0.0 24.9 5.7 = 30.6 0.0 5.2 14.2 0.0 = 19.4 0.0 4.7 17.4 0.5 = 22.6 - PHF 0.000 0.786 0.934 0.882 = 0.930 0.000 0.000 0.860 0.782 = 0.930 0.000 0.865 0.896 0.250 = 0.918 0.000 0.906 0.846 0.444 = 0.860 0.9 Lights 0 22 728 187 = 937 0 0 859 194 = 1053 0 180 485 1 = 666 0 160 589 15 = 764 34 % Lights - 100.0 98.4 100.0 = 98.7 - - 99.5 98.5 = 99.3 - 100.0 98.8 100.0 = 99.1 - 98.2 97.8 93.8 = 97.8 98 Buses 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 0 1 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 3 0 = 3 % Buses - 0.0 0.3 0.0 = 0.2 - - 0.0 0.5 = 0.1 - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 - 0.0 0.5 0.0 = 0.4 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 7 0 = 7 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 2 3 1 = 6 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.9 0.0 = 0.7 - - 0.3 0.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.4 0.0 = 0.3 - 1.2 0.5 6.3 = 0.8 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 1 2 = 3 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 1 6 0 = 7 1 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.4 0.0 = 0.3 - - 0.1 1.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.6 0.0 = 0.4 - 0.6 1.0 0.0 = 0.9 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 1 % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 0. Pedestrians - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - -- - - - - - - = - - - - - = - - - - - _ - - Page 253 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: Elmhurst+Rd+and+Kensington4 TMC 2 Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Westbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right App. Peds Total Int.I 12:00 PM 0 13 61 24 0 98 0 25 57 0 0 82 0 9 128 23 0 160 0 0 162 21 0 183 5e 12:15 PM 0 13 52 17 0 82 0 24 47 0 0 71 0 3 151 26 U 180 0 0 177 21 198 5� 12:30 PM 0 8 47 21 _ 76 0 24 42 0 0 66 0 8 128 24 U 160 0 0 179 17 - 196 4� 12:45 PM 0 7 46 22 - 75 0 19 51 0 - 70 0 5 159 21 0 185 0 0 190 22 0 212 5z Hourly Total 0 41 206 84 1 331 0 92 197 0 0 289 0 25 566 94 0 685 0 0 708 81 0 789 20 1:00 PM 0 12 74 10 96 0 37 57 0 94 0 4 126 25 0 155 0 0 131 19 - 150 4� 1:15 PM 0 6 38 12 056 0 26 42 0 68 0 10 173 24 - 207 0 0 179 21 0 200 5� 1:30 PM 0 11 54 9 0 74 0 25 52 0 0 77 0 7 133 25 165 0 0 142 24 U 166 4E 1:45 PM 0 7 62 13 A82 0 22 32 0 0 54 0 8 183 36 - 227 0 0 166 18 0 184 5z Hourly Total 0 36 228 44 1 308 0 110 183 0 1 293 0 29 615 110 1 754 0 0 618 82 0 700 20 Grand Total 0 77 434 128 639 0 202 380 0 1 582 0 54 1181 204 - 1439 0 0 1326 163 0 1489 41. Approach % 0.0 12.1 67.9 20.0 = - 0.0 34.7 65.3 0.0 = - 0.0 3.8 82.1 14.2 = - 0.0 0.0 89.1 10.9 = - - Total % 0.0 1.9 10.5 3.1 = 15.4 0.0 4.9 9.2 0.0 = 14.0 0.0 1.3 28.5 4.9 = 34.7 0.0 0.0 32.0 3.9 = 35.9 - Lights 0 77 433 128 = 638 0 202 377 0 = 579 0 54 1169 204 = 1427 0 0 1314 161 = 1475 41 % Lights - 100.0 99.8 100.0 = 99.8 - 100.0 99.2 - = 99.5 - 100.0 99.0 100.0 = 99.2 - - 99.1 98.8 = 99.1 99 Buses 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 3 0 = 3 0 0 2 1 = 3 % Buses - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.3 - = 0.2 - 0.0 0.3 0.0 = 0.2 - - 0.2 0.6 = 0.2 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 8 0 = 8 0 0 9 0 = 9 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.2 - 0.0 0.3 - = 0.2 - 0.0 0.7 0.0 = 0.6 - - 0.7 0.0 = 0.6 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 1 1 = 2 z % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.3 - = 0.2 - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 - - 0.1 0.6 = 0.1 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - % Pedestrians - - - - -- - - - - - -0- - - - - - --0 Page 254 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Count Name: Elmhurst+Rd+and+Kensington4 TMC 2 Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 2 Start Time U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Kensington Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 12:00 PM 0 13 61 24 0 98 0 25 57 0 0 82 0 9 128 23 0 160 0 0 162 21 0 183 5e 12:15 PM 0 13 52 17 0 82 0 24 47 0 0 71 0 3 151 26 U 180 0 0 177 21 198 5� 12:30 PM 0 8 47 21 _ 76 0 24 42 0 0 66 0 8 128 24 U 160 0 0 179 17 - 196 4� 12:45 PM 0 7 46 22 - 75 0 19 51 0 - 70 0 5 159 21 0 185 0 0 190 22 0 212 5z Total 0 41 206 84 - 331 0 92 197 0 289 0 25 566 94 0 685 0 0 708 81 0 789 20 Approach % 0.0 12.4 62.2 25.4 = - 0.0 31.8 68.2 0.0 = - 0.0 3.6 82.6 13.7 = - 0.0 0.0 89.7 10.3 = - - Total % 0.0 2.0 9.8 4.0 = 15.8 0.0 4.4 9.4 0.0 = 13.8 0.0 1.2 27.0 4.5 = 32.7 0.0 0.0 33.8 3.9 = 37.7 - PHF 0.000 0.788 0.844 0.875 = 0.844 0.000 0.920 0.864 0.000 = 0.881 0.000 0.694 0.890 0.904 = 0.926 0.000 0.000 0.932 0.920 = 0.930 0.9 Lights 0 41 206 84 = 331 0 92 195 0 = 287 0 25 564 94 = 683 0 0 703 79 = 782 20 % Lights - 100.0 100.0 100.0 = 100.0 - 100.0 99.0 - = 99.3 - 100.0 99.6 100.0 = 99.7 - - 99.3 97.5 = 99.1 99 Buses 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 1 = 2 % Buses - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.5 - = 0.3 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.1 1.2 = 0.3 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 4 0 = 4 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 - - 0.6 0.0 = 0.5 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 1 = 1 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.5 - = 0.3 - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 - - 0.0 1.2 = 0.1 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - - - % Pedestrians - - - - -- Page 255 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: Rand Rd and West Access TM( Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Access Dr Eastbound Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Northbound Thru Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Rand Rd Southbound Right Peds App. Total Int. Tot, 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 266 0 267 0 230 2 0 232 499 0 0 2 2 0 1 222 223 0 245 0 U 245 470 0 0 1 - 1 0 1 246 U 247 0 240 0 U 240 488 0 0 0 _ 0 0 1 225 - 226 0 211 2 0 213 439 Hourly Total 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 959 - 963 0 926 4 0 930 1896 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 211 - 211 0 231 0 231 442 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 235 0 235 0 229 0 0 229 464 0 0 0 0 1 0 242 0 243 0 201 0 - 201 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 - 213 0 226 1 0 227 440 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 901 0 902 0 887 1 0 888 1790 Grand Total 0 0 3 3 1 4 1860 1 1865 0 1813 5 U 1818 3686 Approach % 0.0 0.0 100.0 = - 0.1 0.2 99.7 = - 0.0 99.7 0.3 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 0.1 = 0.1 0.0 0.1 50.5 = 50.6 0.0 49.2 0.1 = 49.3 - Lights 0 0 3 = 3 1 4 1853 = 1858 0 1801 5 = 1806 3667 % Lights - - 100.0 = 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.6 = 99.6 - 99.3 100.0 = 99.3 99.5 Buses 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 0 = 1 1 % Buses - - 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0.0 Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 4 = 4 0 9 0 = 9 13 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 = 0.2 - 0.5 0.0 = 0.5 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 3 = 3 0 2 0 = 2 5 % Articulated Trucks - - 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 = 0.2 - 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0.1 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 Pedestrians - - - U - - - - - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - = - - - - -0- - - - - = - - Page 256 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Count Name: Rand Rd and West Access TM( Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 2 Start Time U-Turn Left Access Dr Eastbound Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Northbound Thru Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Rand Rd Southbound Right Peds App. Total Int. Tot, 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 266 0 267 0 230 2 0 232 499 0 0 2 2 0 1 222 223 0 245 0 U 245 470 0 0 1 - 1 0 1 246 U 247 0 240 0 U 240 488 0 0 0 _ 0 0 1 225 - 226 0 211 2 0 213 439 Total 0 0 3 3 0 4 959 - 963 0 926 4 0 930 1896 Approach % 0.0 0.0 100.0 = - 0.0 0.4 99.6 = - 0.0 99.6 0.4 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 0.2 = 0.2 0.0 0.2 50.6 = 50.8 0.0 48.8 0.2 = 49.1 - PHF 0.000 0.000 0.375 = 0.375 0.000 1.000 0.901 = 0.902 0.000 0.945 0.500 = 0.949 0.950 Lights 0 0 3 = 3 0 4 953 = 957 0 918 4 = 922 1882 % Lights - - 100.0 = 100.0 - 100.0 99.4 = 99.4 - 99.1 100.0 = 99.1 99.3 Buses 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 % Buses - - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 3 = 3 0 7 0 = 7 10 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.3 = 0.3 - 0.8 0.0 = 0.8 0.5 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 3 = 3 0 1 0 = 1 4 % Articulated Trucks - - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.3 = 0.3 - 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0.2 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 Pedestrians - - - 0 - - - - - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - = - - - - 10-0 - - - - _ - - Page 257 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: Rand+Rd+and+Kensington+Rd TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Kenigston Rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Kenigston Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand rd Southbound Thru Right App. Peds Total Int.I 12:00 PM 0 0 55 13 0 68 0 13 55 25 0 93 0 26 218 31 0 275 0 15 217 0 - 232 6E 12:15 PM 0 0 71 21 0 92 0 10 67 26 1 103 0 15 179 26 U 220 0 19 191 0 210 6e 12:30 PM 0 0 53 14 _ 67 0 11 47 22 - 80 0 13 215 34 - 262 0 19 217 0 _ 236 6z 12:45 PM 0 0 68 16 0 84 0 12 62 32 - 106 0 15 166 32 0 213 0 24 180 0 0 204 6( Hourly Total 0 0 247 64 0 311 0 46 231 105 2 382 0 69 778 123 0 970 0 77 805 0 0 882 25. 1:00 PM 0 0 71 15 86 0 9 73 28 0 110 0 15 185 35 0 235 1 21 220 0 - 242 6 -1 1:15 PM 0 0 55 17 0 72 0 10 62 20 - 92 1 11 163 43 218 0 12 187 0 0 199 5E 1:30 PM 0 0 64 7 0 71 0 10 57 24 - 91 0 18 200 39 257 0 26 181 0 0 207 6'e 1:45 PM 0 0 88 14 102 0 6 49 28 0 83 1 12 145 27 - 185 0 16 190 0 0 206 57 Hourly Total 0 0 278 53 0 331 0 35 241 100 0 376 2 56 693 144 0 895 1 75 778 0 0 854 24 Grand Total 0 0 525 117 0 642 0 81 472 205 s 758 2 125 1471 267 U 1865 1 152 1583 0 0 1736 50 Approach % 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 = - 0.0 10.7 62.3 27.0 = - 0.1 6.7 78.9 14.3 = - 0.1 8.8 91.2 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 10.5 2.3 = 12.8 0.0 1.6 9.4 4.1 = 15.2 0.0 2.5 29.4 5.3 = 37.3 0.0 3.0 31.7 0.0 = 34.7 - Lights 0 0 524 117 = 641 0 81 468 204 = 753 2 125 1464 266 = 1857 1 151 1573 0 = 1725 49 % Lights - - 99.8 100.0 = 99.8 - 100.0 99.2 99.5 = 99.3 100.0 100.0 99.5 99.6 = 99.6 100.0 99.3 99.4 - = 99.4 99 Buses 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 2 0 = 2 % Buses - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 - = 0.1 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 1 1 = 2 0 0 5 1 = 6 0 1 6 0 = 7 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 0.2 0.0 = 0.2 - 0.0 0.2 0.5 = 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 = 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.4 - = 0.4 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 2 0 = 2 E % Articulated Trucks - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.4 0.0 = 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 - = 0.1 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 - - - - - - - % Pedestrians - - - - = - - - - - ---- Page 258 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Count Name: Rand+Rd+and+Kensington+Rd TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 2 Start Time U-Turn Left Kenigston Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Kenigston Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand rd Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 12:00 PM 0 0 55 13 0 68 0 13 55 25 0 93 0 26 218 31 0 275 0 15 217 0 0 232 6E 12:15 PM 0 0 71 21 0 92 0 10 67 26 1 103 0 15 179 26 U 220 0 19 191 0 210 6e 12:30 PM 0 0 53 14 _ 67 0 11 47 22 - 80 0 13 215 34 - 262 0 19 217 0 _ 236 6z 12:45 PM 0 0 68 16 0 84 0 12 62 32 - 106 0 15 166 32 0 213 0 24 180 0 0 204 6( Total 0 0 247 64 0 311 0 46 231 105 382 0 69 778 123 - 970 0 77 805 0 0 882 25. Approach % 0.0 0.0 79.4 20.6 = - 0.0 12.0 60.5 27.5 = - 0.0 7.1 80.2 12.7 = - 0.0 8.7 91.3 0.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 9.7 2.5 = 12.2 0.0 1.8 9.1 4.1 = 15.0 0.0 2.7 30.6 4.8 = 38.1 0.0 3.0 31.6 0.0 = 34.7 - PHF 0.000 0.000 0.870 0.762 = 0.845 0.000 0.885 0.862 0.820 = 0.901 0.000 0.663 0.892 0.904 = 0.882 0.000 0.802 0.927 0.000 = 0.934 0.9 Lights 0 0 247 64 = 311 0 46 229 104 = 379 0 69 772 123 = 964 0 77 800 0 = 877 25 % Lights - - 100.0 100.0 = 100.0 - 100.0 99.1 99.0 = 99.2 - 100.0 99.2 100.0 = 99.4 - 100.0 99.4 - = 99.4 99 Buses 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Buses - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.4 0.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 1 = 1 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 0 4 0 = 4 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 1.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.5 0.0 = 0.4 - 0.0 0.5 - = 0.5 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 1 0 = 1 z % Articulated Trucks - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.4 0.0 = 0.3 - 0.0 0.3 0.0 = 0.2 - 0.0 0.1 - = 0.1 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - = - - - - - 00_U Page 259 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: US+12+Rand+and+Access+Dr TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left access rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left access rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 12:00 PM 0 0 209 0 0 209 0 1 239 1 0 241 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 4E 12:15 PM 0 0 258 0 0 258 0 1 256 0 0 257 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 51 12:30 PM 0 0 227 0 _ 227 0 0 221 0 0 221 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 _ 0 4E 12:45 PM 0 0 230 0 0 230 0 1 251 0 - 252 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4E Hourly Total 0 0 924 0 0 924 0 3 967 1 0 971 0 1 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 3 0 4 19 1:00 PM 0 2 217 0 219 0 0 198 0 0 198 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 - 2 42 1:15 PM 0 0 241 0 0 241 0 0 247 0 - 247 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4E 1:30 PM 0 1 169 0 0 170 1 1 201 1 204 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1 1 2 31 1:45 PM 0 0 239 1 240 0 0 229 1 0 230 0 0 0 4 - 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 Hourly Total 0 3 866 1 0 870 1 1 875 2 0 879 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 2 0 2 1 4 17 Grand Total 0 3 1790 1 = 1794 1 4 1842 3 0 1850 0 1 0 16 U 17 0 3 0 5 1 8 36 Approach % 0.0 0.2 99.8 0.1 = - 0.1 0.2 99.6 0.2 = - 0.0 5.9 0.0 94.1 = - 0.0 37.5 0.0 62.5 = - - Total % 0.0 0.1 48.8 0.0 = 48.9 0.0 0.1 50.2 0.1 = 50.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 = 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 = 0.2 - Lights 0 3 1778 1 = 1782 1 4 1833 2 = 1840 0 1 0 16 = 17 0 3 0 5 = 8 36. % Lights - 100.0 99.3 100.0 = 99.3 100.0 100.0 99.5 66.7 = 99.5 - 100.0 - 100.0 = 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 = 100.0 99 Buses 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 % Buses - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 8 0 = 8 0 0 7 1 = 8 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.4 0.0 = 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 33.3 = 0.4 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0- % Pedestrians - - - - = - - - - - = - - - - - = - - - - - - � -0 - - Page 260 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Count Name: US+12+Rand+and+Access+Dr TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 2 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left access rd Northbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left access rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 12:00 PM 0 0 209 0 0 209 0 1 239 1 0 241 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 4E 12:15 PM 0 0 258 0 0 258 0 1 256 0 0 257 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 51 12:30 PM 0 0 227 0 _ 227 0 0 221 0 0 221 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 _ 0 4E 12:45 PM 0 0 230 0 0 230 0 1 251 0 - 252 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4E Total 0 0 924 0 _ 924 0 3 967 1 - 971 0 1 0 8 - 9 0 1 0 3 _ 4 19 Approach % 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 = - 0.0 0.3 99.6 0.1 = - 0.0 11.1 0.0 88.9 = - 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 = - - Total % 0.0 0.0 48.4 0.0 = 48.4 0.0 0.2 50.7 0.1 = 50.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 = 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 = 0.2 - PHF 0.000 0.000 0.895 0.000 = 0.895 0.000 0.750 0.944 0.250 = 0.945 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.667 = 0.563 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 = 0.333 0.9 Lights 0 0 917 0 = 917 0 3 959 0 = 962 0 1 0 8 = 9 0 1 0 3 = 4 18 % Lights - - 99.2 - = 99.2 - 100.0 99.2 0.0 = 99.1 - 100.0 - 100.0 = 100.0 - 100.0 - 100.0 = 100.0 99 Buses 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 % Buses - - 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 6 0 = 6 0 0 6 1 = 7 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - - 0.6 - = 0.6 - 0.0 0.6 100.0 = 0.7 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 % Articulated Trucks - - 0.1 - = 0.1 - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.2 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - - 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - = - - - - - = - - - - - = - i - - - - _ - - Page 261 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Data Count Name: US-12+Rand+and+IL- 83+Elmhurst+Rd TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 1 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 12:00 PM 0 11 143 59 = 213 0 0 172 57 0 229 0 44 105 0 0 149 0 46 122 11 179 71 12:15 PM 0 16 176 62 254 0 0 176 50 0 226 0 43 118 0 U 161 0 58 131 10 0 199 8z 12:30 PM 0 17 163 58 _ 238 0 0 170 49 0 219 0 41 97 0 U 138 0 56 139 8 _ 203 7� 12:45 PM 0 12 174 54 0 240 0 0 176 45 - 221 0 44 111 0 0 155 0 52 146 12 0 210 8e Hourly Total 0 56 656 233 945 0 0 694 201 0 895 0 172 431 0 0 603 0 212 538 41 0 791 32 1:00 PM 0 12 150 35 197 0 0 147 41 188 0 54 92 2 0 148 0 38 140 9 - 187 7� 1:15 PM 0 9 175 73 257 0 0 159 48 - 207 0 41 118 0 0 159 0 56 128 6 0 190 81 1:30 PM 0 6 126 54 0 186 0 0 160 44 - 204 0 40 103 0 143 0 44 128 7 - 179 71 1:45 PM 0 10 176 61 247 0 0 149 36 0 185 0 59 111 0 - 170 0 56 132 8 0 196 7� Hourly Total 0 37 627 223 16 887 0 0 615 169 1 784 0 194 424 2 0 620 0 194 528 30 0 752 30. Grand Total 0 93 1283 456 - U 1832 0 0 1309 370 1 1679 0 366 855 2 0 1223 0 406 1066 71 0 1543 62 Approach % 0.0 5.1 70.0 24.9 = - 0.0 0.0 78.0 22.0 = - 0.0 29.9 69.9 0.2 = - 0.0 26.3 69.1 4.6 = - - Total % 0.0 1.5 20.4 7.3 = 29.2 0.0 0.0 20.9 5.9 = 26.7 0.0 5.8 13.6 0.0 = 19.5 0.0 6.5 17.0 1.1 = 24.6 - Lights 0 93 1273 455 = 1821 0 0 1299 369 = 1668 0 366 843 2 = 1211 0 405 1051 71 = 1527 62 % Lights - 100.0 99.2 99.8 = 99.4 - - 99.2 99.7 = 99.3 - 100.0 98.6 100.0 = 99.0 - 99.8 98.6 100.0 = 99.0 99 Buses 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 0 1 = 1 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 1 3 0 = 4 1 % Buses - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 - - 0.0 0.3 = 0.1 - 0.0 0.5 0.0 = 0.3 - 0.2 0.3 0.0 = 0.3 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 7 1 = 8 0 0 6 0 = 6 0 0 7 0 = 7 0 0 11 0 = 11 3 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.5 0.2 = 0.4 - - 0.5 0.0 = 0.4 - 0.0 0.8 0.0 = 0.6 - 0.0 1.0 0.0 = 0.7 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 1 f % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 - - 0.3 0.0 = 0.2 - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 - 0.0 0.1 0.0 = 0.1 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - A z - - - - - - - - - - 0 - - - - - - - % Pedestrians i - - - - - -- - i - - - - - 0-0 - i - - - - _ - i - - - - _ - I - Page 262 In 0 Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc. 9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018 (847)518-9990 dfreeman@kloainc.com Turnina Movement Peak Hour Data (12:00 PM) Count Name: US-12+Rand+and+IL- 83+Elmhurst+Rd TMC Site Code: Start Date: 09/27/2025 Page No: 2 Start Time U-Turn Left Rand Rd Eastbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Rand Rd Westbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Northbound Thru Right App. Peds Total U-Turn Left Elmhurst Rd Southbound Thru Right Peds App. Total Int.I 12:00 PM 0 11 143 59 = 213 0 0 172 57 0 229 0 44 105 0 0 149 0 46 122 11 179 71 12:15 PM 0 16 176 62 254 0 0 176 50 0 226 0 43 118 0 U 161 0 58 131 10 0 199 8z 12:30 PM 0 17 163 58 _ 238 0 0 170 49 0 219 0 41 97 0 U 138 0 56 139 8 _ 203 7� 12:45 PM 0 12 174 54 0 240 0 0 176 45 - 221 0 44 111 0 0 155 0 52 146 12 0 210 8e Total 0 56 656 233 - 945 0 0 694 201 - 895 0 172 431 0 - 603 0 212 538 41 0 791 32 Approach % 0.0 5.9 69.4 24.7 = - 0.0 0.0 77.5 22.5 = - 0.0 28.5 71.5 0.0 = - 0.0 26.8 68.0 5.2 = - - Total % 0.0 1.7 20.3 7.2 = 29.2 0.0 0.0 21.5 6.2 = 27.7 0.0 5.3 13.3 0.0 = 18.6 0.0 6.6 16.6 1.3 = 24.5 - PHF 0.000 0.824 0.932 0.940 = 0.930 0.000 0.000 0.986 0.882 = 0.977 0.000 0.977 0.913 0.000 = 0.936 0.000 0.914 0.921 0.854 = 0.942 0.9 Lights 0 56 651 233 = 940 0 0 685 200 = 885 0 172 427 0 = 599 0 212 530 41 = 783 32 % Lights - 100.0 99.2 100.0 = 99.5 - - 98.7 99.5 = 98.9 - 100.0 99.1 - = 99.3 - 100.0 98.5 100.0 = 99.0 99 Buses 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 1 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 2 0 = 2 z % Buses - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.5 = 0.1 - 0.0 0.2 - = 0.2 - 0.0 0.4 0.0 = 0.3 0. Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 0 5 0 = 5 0 0 2 0 = 2 0 0 5 0 = 5 1 % Single -Unit Trucks - 0.0 0.6 0.0 = 0.4 - - 0.7 0.0 = 0.6 - 0.0 0.5 - = 0.3 - 0.0 0.9 0.0 = 0.6 0. Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 4 0 = 4 0 0 1 0 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 1 % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 - - 0.6 0.0 = 0.4 - 0.0 0.2 - = 0.2 - 0.0 0.2 0.0 = 0.1 0. Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 C % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - = 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0. Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U - - - - - 0 - - % Pedestrians - - - - -- - Page 263 Site Plan Page 264 of 455 U OH 01- H oFfug Fm] eOH H OH 0 1- OH z OH 0 I ITE Trip Generation Sheets Page 266 of 455 Automated Car Wash (948) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 14 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. G FA: 5 Directional Distribution: 55% entering, 45% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 14.89 3.16 - 34.71 9.20 Data Plot and Equation 200 100 X X X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 000 000 .00 000 o X X•000 X X X X X 00 2 4 6 8 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given - - - - - Average Rate R2= *** its- General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 827 Page 267 of 455 Automated Car Wash (948) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 15 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. G FA: 4 Directional Distribution: 49% entering, 51 % exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 24.40 3.16 - 48.62 14.47 Data Plot and Equation 0111810 200 100 x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x X X ' X o ;X .' X.' X 01 X X X 00 2 4 6 8 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given - - - - - Average Rate R2= *** 828 Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition • Volume 5 Page 268 of 455 Automated Car Wash (948) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 17 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. G FA: 4 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 32.10 6.84 - 61.96 16.11 Data Plot and Equation 0111810 200 100 00 x X ---------------------------- - - - - ------------------------------ - - - - ------------------------------ - - - - -- ----------------------------------- x x X X X X '' X X' ,x - ---------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------------------------- .01 01 X X 2 4 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given 6 8 - - - - - Average Rate R2= *** 832 Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition • Volume 5 its- Page 269 of 455 CMAP 2050 Projections Letter Page 270 of 455 k..ohicago Metropolitan iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilliAge��ncyforPlan�ning Ryan May Project Coordinator Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara and Aboona, Inc. 9575 West Higgins Road Suite 400 Rosemont, IL 60018 Subject: Main Street (IL 83) - Rand Road (US 12) - Kensington Road IDOT Dear Mr. May: 33 West Van Buren 1r I, Suite Chicago, IL 60607 cmap.illinols.go312-454-0400 September 12, 2025 In response to a request made on your behalf and dated September 11, 2025, we have developed year 2050 average daily traffic (ADT) projections for the subject location. ROAD SEGMENT Current ADT Year 2050 ADT Rand Road west of Main Street 20,200 23,500 Rand Road east of Main Street 1900 23,600 Main Street north of Rand Road 14,300 17,000 Main Street south of Rand Road 13,300 159300 Kensington Road west of Main Street 51800 71000 Kensington Road east of Main Street 5,900 79100 Main Street south of Kensington Road 151400 179400 Rand Road south of Kensington Road 20,100 23,800 Kensington Road east of Rand Road 8,150 99650 Traffic projections are developed using existing ADT data provided in the request letter and the results from the June 2025 CMAP Travel Demand Analysis. The regional travel model uses CMAP 2050 socioeconomic projections and assumes the implementation of the ON TO 2050 Comprehensive Regional Plan for the Northeastern Illinois area. The provision of this data in support of your request does not constitute a CMAP endorsement of the proposed development or any subsequent developments. If you have any questions, please call me at (312) 386-8806 or email me at,jrodriguezkcmap.illinois.gov a Jose Rodriguez, PTP, AICP Senior Planner, Research & Analysis cc: Rios (IDOT) S:\AdminGroups\ResearchAnalysis\2025_trafficForecasts\MountProspect\ck-100-25\ck-100-25.docx TRAFFIC FORECAST RECORD Record Number: ck-100-25 Type of Report: Projection Year Sought: 2050 Anal st: JAR Organization Requestion Forecast: KLOA Contact: Ryan May Email or Phone: rmay@kloainc.com Sponsor: IDOT Date request was received: 9/11/2025 Date that response was emailed: 9/12/2025 Facility Location: Main Street (IL 83) -Rand Road (US 12) -Kensington Road Municipality: Mount Prospect Level of Service Criteria Page 273 of 455 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERI Signalized Intersections Level of Average Control Service Interpretation Delay (seconds per vehicle) Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the A green indication and travel through the intersection <_ 10 without stopping. B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for > - 10 20 Level of Service A. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient C capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear. Number > 20 - 35 of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. The volume -to -capacity ratio is high and either D progression is ineffective or the cycle length is too long. > - 35 55 Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. Progression is unfavorable. The volume -to -capacity ratio E is high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle > 55 - 80 failures are frequent. The volume -to -capacity ratio is very high, progression is F very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to > 80 clear the queue. Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A 0-10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 7' Edition. Page 274 of 455 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 275 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO ��eIllo�f Lane Configurations *T' r 4M 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 33 209 195 61 171 0 53 587 75 0 586 66 Future Volume (vph) 33 209 195 61 171 0 53 587 75 0 586 66 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 245 0 0 205 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.983 0.985 Flt Protected 0.993 0.987 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3741 1568 0 3668 0 1770 3573 0 0 3606 0 Flt Permitted 0.737 0.708 0.382 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2777 1568 0 2631 0 712 3573 0 0 3606 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 253 6 8 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 330 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 5.6 4.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (o%) 0% 1% 3°% 3°% 2% 0% 2% 5% 1% 0% 4°% 2°% Shared Lane Traffic (°%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 263 212 0 252 0 58 720 0 0 709 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA NA Protected Phases 6 1 6 9 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 1 6 9 8 12 Detector Phase 6 6 6 1 6 9 1 69 3 38 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 32.0 Total Split (°%) 14.1 °% 14.1 °% 14.1 °% 14.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 25.0 59.0 62.0 62.0 117.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.11 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.53 0.36 0.17 0.71 0.37 Control Delay (s/veh) 109.4 7.8 3.2 48.3 63.7 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 3.7 0.3 Total Delay (s/veh) 109.4 7.8 3.9 48.3 67.4 2.5 LOS F A A D E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 64.1 3.9 66.0 2.5 Approach LOS E A E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 200 0 3 57 455 15 Queue Length 95th (ft) 261 34 4 98 528 17 EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 1 DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Page 276 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Shared Lane Traffic (%) Turn Type Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 19.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 38.0 52.0 21.0 46.0 38.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 11% 17% 24% 10% 21% 17%° 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 2 DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Page 277 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) 245 205 Base Capacity (vph) 340 402 705 335 1011 1921 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 211 0 0 587 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 204 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 38.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.3% ICU Level of Servic Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road #101 #201 *3(ID1 7t201 #301 �#IQY310201k2#201 #301 #101 #201 #301 �'1 H,02012080V30 7 �ti'� V12%M 04 EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Page 278 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 4 Page 279 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations ' 0 tt r tO itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 156 464 0 142 464 16 5 880 188 0 592 123 Future Volume (vph) 156 464 0 142 464 16 5 880 188 0 592 123 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 315 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 095 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3585 0 1787 3585 1429 1805 5223 0 0 3654 1495 Flt Permitted 0.376 0.169 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 694 3585 0 318 3585 1429 1805 5223 0 0 3654 1495 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 223 21 193 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3272 344 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.7 55.8 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3%° 6% 0% 1 % 6% 13%° 0% 2% 1 % 0% 4% 8% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 478 0 146 478 16 5 1101 0 0 610 127 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom Prot NA NA custom Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 811 411 4 12 1 2 6 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 4 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 1 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 46.0 52.0 21.0 Total Split (%) 14.5% 20.9% 23.6%° 9.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 69.0 41.0 87.0 55.0 48.0 17.0 62.0 104.0 86.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.19 0.40 0.25 0.22 0.08 0.28 0.47 0.39 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.72 0.36 0.53 0.03 0.04 0.74 0.35 0.18 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.7 39.8 46.6 74.0 0.1 94.8 73.8 4.1 04 Queue Delay 1.2 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 Total Delay (s/veh) 12.9 62.0 46.6 74.0 0.1 94.8 73.8 4.4 0.7 LOS B E D E A F E A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 49.6 65.9 73.9 3.7 Approach LOS D E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 373 141 335 0 7 536 30 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m27 449 204 405 0 25 594 34 0 EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 5 DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Page 280 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Shared Lane Traffic (%) Turn Type Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 19.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 38.0 31.0 38.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 11% 17% 14% 17% 3% 3%° 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 6 DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Page 281 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 t CA *J Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3192 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 352 668 406 896 486 139 1487 1727 701 Starvation Cap Reductn 69 193 0 0 0 0 0 543 250 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 50.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 51 .0% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 #101 #201 *3G'D1 7t2011 #301 �#IQY310201k2 #201 #301 #101 #2011 #301 �'1 V102012080V30 7 '� � 0,9 '� ti'� 1 Jti�� V12%M 1 � � 04 1 I3 "� �� #201 #101, #201 07 08 EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 7 Page 282 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 8 Page 283 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 3F NO ��eIllo�f Lane Configurations *T' r +tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 207 77 14 160 83 60 962 0 72 632 39 Future Volume (vph) 0 207 77 14 160 83 60 962 0 72 632 39 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 095 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.996 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3582 0 0 3683 1553 1787 5250 0 1770 3725 1615 Flt Permitted 0.782 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3582 0 0 2892 1553 1787 5250 0 1770 3725 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 21 253 253 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 337 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 2% 1% 0% 3% 4%° 1% 4% 3% 2% 2% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 306 0 0 187 89 65 1034 0 77 680 42 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 19.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 25.0 38.0' Total Split (%) 14.1 % 14.1 % 14.1 % 11.4% 17.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0; Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 34.0 27.0 25.0 108.0 153.0 21.0 59.0 34.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.49 0.70 0.10 0.27 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.53 0.22 0.07 0.28 0.46 0.68 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.3 96.5 1.3 13.2 1.0 103.6 76.2 04 Queue Delay 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 18.6 96.5 1.3 13.2 1.5 103.6 76.2 0.4 LOS B F A B A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 18.6 65.8 2.2 74.8 Approach LOS B E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 59 140 0 59 11 110 478 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 75 191 0 m73 12 179 557 0 EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 9 DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Page 284 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Shared Lane Traffic (%) Turn Type Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 52.0 21.0 46.0 38.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 15% 24% 10% 21% 17% 3%° 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 10 DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Page 285 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 3F NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 257 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 571 354 400 877 3651 168 998 463 Starvation Cap Reductn 151 0 0 0 2001 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 34.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 301: US-12 & Kensington Road #101 #201 *3G'D1 7t2011 #301 �#IQY310201k2 #201 #301 #101 #2011 #301 �'1 V102012080V30 7 '� � '� ti'� 1 Jti�� 9 0 V12%M 1 � � 04 1 I3 "� �� #201 #101, #201 07 1 08 EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 11 Page 286 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 12 Page 287 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotive north access drive & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations fit tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1047 6 2 743 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1047 6 2 743 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1120 0 0 1516 1912 560 1352 1915 395 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1117 1117 - 795 795 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 399 795 - 557 1120 - Critical Hdwy - - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 631 - 0 83 69 477 111 68 610 Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 224 285 - 352 402 - Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 603 402 - 487 284 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 631 - - 83 69 477 110 68 610 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 177 182 - 234 181 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 224 285 - 350 401 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 601 401 - 487 284 - HCM LOS A A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.003 - - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 10.7 - - - 0 HCM Lane LOS A B - - A EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Page 288 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9 : Just Tires/Ki m ber Automotives south access drive & US-1 2 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations fit tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 1043 2 1 744 5 1 0 4 1 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 1043 2 1 744 5 1 0 4 1 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 797 0 0 1112 0 0 1513 1914 556 1355 1912 398 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1115 1115 - 796 796 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 398 799 - 559 1116 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9' Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 834 - - 636 - - 84 69 480 110 69 607 Stage 1 - - - - - - 225 286 - 351 402 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 605 401 - 486 285 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 834 - - 636 - - 84 68 480 108 68 607 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 177 182 - 232 182 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 224 285 - 350 401 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 603 400 - 480 284 - HCM LOS C C HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.002 - - 0.003 - - 0.005 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.2 10.7 - - 9.3 - - 20.6 HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - C EXAM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DF 7:30 am 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Page 289 of 455 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 290 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO ��eIllo�f Lane Configurations *T' r 4M 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 28 206 79 73 268 0 48 692 91 0 728 110 Future Volume (vph) 28 206 79 73 268 0 48 692 91 0 728 110 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 245 0 0 205 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.983 0.980 Flt Protected 0.994 0.989 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3744 1599 0 3729 0 1805 3703 0 0 3687 0 Flt Permitted 0.637 0.723 0.325 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2399 1599 0 2726 0 618 3703 0 0 3687 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 213 7 12 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 35 35 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 320 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 6.2 4.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1 % 1 % 0% 1 % 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 244 82 0 355 0 50 816 0 0 873 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA NA Protected Phases 6 1 6 9 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 1 6 9 8 12 Detector Phase 6 6 6 1 6 9 1 69 3 38 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 13.0%0 13.0% 13.0% 11.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 Led/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 26.0 24.0 60.0 75.2 77.6 131.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.10 0.26 0.33 0.34 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.23 0.50 0.16 0.65 0.41 Control Delay (s/veh) 132.7 1.5 3.1 53.1 66.8 1.7 Queue Delay 21.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.8 0.4 Total Delay (s/veh) 153.8 1.5 6.1 53.1 67.6 2.2 LOS F A A D E A Approach LOS F A E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 197 0 3 52 557 5 Queue Length 95th (ft) #292 0 m4 92 636 0 EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 1 Page 291 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 49.0 55.0 21.0 27.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 21% 24% 9% 12% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EX PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 2 Page 292 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 W-A Turn Bay Length (ft) 245 205 Base Capacity (vph) 271 357 711 320 1254 2105 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 251 0 0 680 Spillback Cap Reductn 30 0 0 0 185 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 41.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Servic Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 0 11202 1#201 V12 1 #201 07 01 #201 #301 #1 V10203 l 4 #101 #201 08 EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 3 Page 293 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 4 Page 294 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations ' 0 tt r tO itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 193 527 0 171 639 16 22 775 199 0 871 199' Future Volume (vph) 193 527 0 171 639 16 22 775 199 0 871 199 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 315 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 095 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.969 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3762 0 1770 3725 1524 1805 5249 0 0 3800 1615 Flt Permitted 0.136 0.239 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 258 3762 0 445 3725 1524 1805 5249 0 0 3800 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 213 29 157 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3272 344 Travel Time (s) 4.9 12.2 55.8 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 1% 0% 2% 2% 6% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 549 0 178 666 17 23 1014 0 0 907 207 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom Prot NA NA custom Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 811 411 4 12 1 2 6 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 4 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 1 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 27.0 55.0 21.0 Total Split (%) 11.7% 11.7% 23.9%° 9.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 82.2 59.6 79.4 58.0 51.0 17.0 73.0 116.0 98.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.26 0.35 0.25 0.22 0.07 0.32 0.50 0.43 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.56 0.64 0.71 0.03 0.17 0.60 0.47 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 82.8 19.9 62.4 83.2 0.1 103.3 66.0 4.3 06 Queue Delay 15.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.4 Total Delay (s/veh) 98.1 22.1 62.4 83.2 0.1 103.3 66.0 4.8 1.0 LOS F C E F A F E A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 42.5 77.3 66.8 4.1 Approach LOS D E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 117 401 194 500 0 34 472 48 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#318 m430 271 580 0 72 523 53 m0 EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 5 Page 295 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 49.0 30.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 21% 13% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EX PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 6 Page 296 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 t CA *J Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3192 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 246 974 289 939 503 133 1685 1916 778 Starvation Cap Reductn 35 283 0 0 0 0 0 536 260 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 45.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.3% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 #101 #201 4OM1 #201 #301 #1011020VA "001#201 #3U01 #201 #301 #1 V1020V20301*)l 2 0(RV12INS 0 \9 5 k 04 WE iiiiiiii�l�/:, � /:,� °% ,////,, ��,// � ���,� �'/:./;:, #201 #101 #201 07 08 EX PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 7 Page 297 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 10/24/2025 EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 8 Page 298 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 3F *144. Lane Configurations 0 +T' r +tt tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 226 71 22 268 131 70 876 0 73 939 67 Future Volume (vph) 0 226 71 22 268 131 70 876 0 73 939 67 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 095 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.964 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.996 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3663 0 0 3785 1583 1805 5406 0 1787 3762 1583 Flt Permitted 0.692 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3663 0 0 2630 1583 1805 5406 0 1787 3762 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 213 213 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 337 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 0% 0% 0% 0% 2%° 0% 1% 0% 1% 1%° 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 306 0 0 299 135 72 903 0 75 968 69 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 27.0 49.0' Total Split (%) 13.0% 13.0% 13.0% 11.7% 21.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0; Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 33.0 26.0 24.0 106.0 162.0 23.0 72.0 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.11 0.10 0.46 0.70 0.10 0.31 0.20' v/c Ratio 0.57 1.01 0.38 0.09 0.24 0.42 0.82 0.14 Control Delay (s/veh) 19.5 150.8 3.1 21.3 0.7 105.1 80.0 06 Queue Delay 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 24.6 150.8 3.1 21.3 1.0 105.1 80.0 0.6 LOS C F A C A F F A Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.6 104.9 2.5 76.8 Approach LOS C F A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 74 -245 0 83 5 110 730 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m86 #367 0 133 5 178 818 0 EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 9 Page 299 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 55.0 21.0 27.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 24% 9% 12% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EX PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 10 Page 300 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 3F NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 257 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 538 297 355 831 3807 178 1177 481 Starvation Cap Reductn 168 0 0 0 2099 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 49.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Finases: 3101: U5-12 & Kensington Koad #101 #201 4OM1 #201 #301 #1011020V21 "001#201 #3M01 #201 #301 #1 V1020V20301*)1 02 (R 061 0 \9 V12 4 #201 #101 #201 08 07 01 EX PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 11 Page 301 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 12 Page 302 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotive north access drives & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 969 0 1 1079 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 969 0 1 1079 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1053 0 0 1642 2228 527 1702 2228 586 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1053 1053 - 1175 1175 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 589 1175 - 527 1053 - Critical Hdwy - - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 657 - - 66 42 496 59 42 453 Stage 1 0 - - - - - 242 301 - 204 264 - Stage 2 0 - - - - - 462 264 - 503 301 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 657 - - 66 42 496 59 42 453 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 171 147 - 153 147 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 242 301 - 203 263 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 461 263 - 502 301 - HCM LOS B A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.002 - - - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.3 10.5 - - - - 0' HCM Lane LOS B B - - A EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 1 Page 303 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives south access drives & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 969 0 2 1077 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 1 969 0 2 1077 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 1174 0 0 1053 0 0 1645 2234 527 1705 2232 587 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1055 1055 - 1177 1177 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 590 1178 - 529 1055 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 591 - - 657 - - 66 42 496 59 42 453 Stage 1 - - - - - - 241 300 - 203 263 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 461 263 - 501 300 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 591 - - 657 - - 65 42 496 59 42 453 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 170 146 - 152 146 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 240 300 - 202 262 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 457 261 - 499 300 - HCM LOS C HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.003 - - 0.002 - - 0.012 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 19.4 10.5 - - 11.1 - - 18.3 HCM Lane LOS C B - - B - C C EX PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 5:15 pm 10/24/2025jnchro 12 Report Page 2 Page 304 of 455 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Page 305 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO ��eIllo�f Lane Configurations *Tt r 4M 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 41 214 84 92 208 0 25 566 97 0 708 81 Future Volume (vph) 41 214 84 92 208 0 25 566 97 0 708 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 245 0 0 205 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.978 0.985 FIt Protected 0.992 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3770 1615 0 3717 0 1805 3716 0 0 3706 0 FIt Permitted 0.693 0.691 0.345 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2633 1615 0 2608 0 656 3716 0 0 3706 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 245 10 9 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 35 35 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 310 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 6.0 4.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 263 87 0 309 0 26 684 0 0 814 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA NA Protected Phases 6 169 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 169 8 12 Detector Phase 6 6 6 169 1 69 3 38 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 15.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 25.0 60.0 64.4 66.8 98.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.13 0.30 0.32 0.33 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.21 0.40 0.07 0.55 0.45 Control Delay (s/veh) 96.7 1.1 1.7 45.6 55.3 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.6 0.4 Total Delay (s/veh) 96.7 1.1 3.5 45.6 55.9 2.5 LOS F A A D E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 72.9 3.5 55.6 2.5 Approach LOS E A E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 178 0 1 23 383 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 236 0 ml 51 452 11 EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 1 DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Page 306 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Shared Lane Traffic (%) Turn Type Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 31.0 41.0 20.0 30.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 13% 16% 21% 10% 15% 21%° 4% 4% 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 2 DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Page 307 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 W-A Turn Bay Length (ft) 245 205 Base Capacity (vph) 355 416 782 360 1247 1820 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 317 0 0 488 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 249 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 31.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.9% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10 1: IL 83 & Kensington Road W*201 #201 #301 #101 #201 #301 #1 0VM01#301 V.2 0 04 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUN� #201 #101 #201 07 08 EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Page 308 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 4 Page 309 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations ' 0 tt r tO itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 173 434 0 226 551 41 56 701 238 0 694 201 Future Volume (vph) 173 434 0 226 551 41 56 701 238 0 694 201 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 305 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 095 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.962 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3762 0 1805 3762 1615 1805 5214 0 0 3762 1615 Flt Permitted 0.157 0.296 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 298 3762 0 562 3762 1615 1805 5214 0 0 3762 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 245 42 180 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3227 344 Travel Time (s) 4.9 12.2 55.0 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% ' 0% 1%° 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 180 452 0 235 574 43 58 978 0 0 723 209 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom Prot NA NA custom Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 811 411 4 12 1 2 6 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 4 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 1 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 41.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 15.0% 15.0% 20.5%° 10.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 71.4 46.0 68.0 44.0 37.0 16.0 54.0 98.0 80.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.23 0.34 0.22 0.19 0.08 0.27 0.49 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.52 0.69 0.69 0.09 0.40 0.68 0.39 0.28 Control Delay (s/veh) 33.4 27.5 57.2 76.9 0.3 96.3 65.1 3.6 1.0 Queue Delay 2.7 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.4 Total Delay (s/veh) 36.2 29.2 57.2 76.9 0.3 96.3 65.1 4.0 1.3 LOS D C E E A F E A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 31.2 67.6 66.9 3.4 Approach LOS C E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 291 225 374 0 74 412 31 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m100 356 310 447 0 131 467 35 m0 EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 5 DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Page 310 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Shared Lane Traffic (%) Turn Type Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 31.0 31.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 13% 16% 16% 21% 4% 4%° 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 6 DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Page 311 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 t CA *J Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3147 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 100 Base Capacity (vph) 302 864 358 827 498 144 1438 1843 754 Starvation Cap Reductn 52 248 0 0 0 0 0 633 213 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 43.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 #101 #201 #30-1101 #201 #301 #1q1#14ffl011# *201 #201 #301 #101 #201 #301 # V IMOM01#301 3 20 �09, 04 ) UUUUUUUUUUUUUUN1 lei //// ///% #201 #101, #201 07 08 EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 7 Page 312 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 8 Page 313 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 3F *144. Lane Configurations 0 +T' r +tt tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 247 64 49 231 106 77 850 0 69 789 123 Future Volume (vph) 0 247 64 49 231 106 77 850 0 69 789 123 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 095 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.969 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.991 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3682 0 0 3766 1599 1805 5406 0 1805 3762 1615 Flt Permitted 0.612 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3682 0 0 2326 1599 1805 5406 0 1805 3762 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 14 245 245 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 330 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%° 0% 1% 0% ' 0% 1%° 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 327 0 0 295 112 81 895 0 73 831 129 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 26.0 310' Total Split (%) 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 13.0% 15.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0; Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 34.0 27.0 25.0 94.0 132.0 22.0 53.0 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.14 0.13 0.47 0.66 0.11 0.27 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.94 0.27 0.10 0.25 0.37 0.83 0.30 Control Delay (s/veh) 18.2 121.1 1.6 10.6 1.1 88.4 77.9 1.8 Queue Delay 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 20.3 121.1 1.6 10.6 1.5 88.4 77.9 1.8 LOS C F A B A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 20.3 88.2 2.3 69.2 Approach LOS C F A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 70 206 0 58 9 91 554 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 88 #311 0 m77 9 154 641 0 EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 9 DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Page 314 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Shared Lane Traffic (%) Turn Type Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 41.0 20.0 30.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 15% 21% 10% 15% 21% 4%° 4% 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 10 DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Page 315 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 3F NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 250 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 637 314 414 848 3567 198 996 429 Starvation Cap Reductn 185 0 0 0 1989 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 42.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 301: US-12 & Kensington Road W*201 #201 #301 #101 #201 #301 #1 0VM01#301 V.2 0 04 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUN� #201 #101 #201 07 08 EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 11 Page 316 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 12 Page 317 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives north access drives & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations 0 tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 959 0 0 981 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 4 959 0 0 981 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 1071 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 647 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 647 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) HCM Lane LOS 0 0 - - 0 1584 2122 521 1598 2120 535 - - - - - 1051 1051 - 1068 1068 - - - - - - 533 1071 - 530 1051 - - - - - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 0 - - 73 50 500 71 50 490 - - 0 - - 242 302 - 237 296 - - - 0 - - 498 296 - 500 302 - - - - - - 72 49 500 70 49 490 - - - - - 176 157 - 173 158 - - - - - - 240 299 - 237 296 - - - - - - 498 296 - 496 299 - A A - 0.007 - - - - 106 - - 0 B - - A EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Page 318 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives south access drives & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 959 0 3 981 1 1 0 8 1 0 3 Future Vol, veh/h 0 959 0 3 981 1 1 0 8 1 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1042 0 0 1582 2116 521 1595 2116 534 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1042 1042 - 1073 1073 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 540 1074 - 521 1042 - Critical Hdwy - - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 663 - - 73 50 500 72 50 491 Stage 1 0 - - - - - 245 305 - 235 295 - Stage 2 0 - - - - - 494 294 - 506 305 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 663 - - 72 50 500 70 50 491 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 177 159 - 171 158 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 245 305 - 233 293 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 487 292 - 498 305 - HCM LOS B C HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.005 - - - - 0.013 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.9 10.5 - - - - 15.9 HCM Lane LOS B B - - C EX SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Existing Satuday Midday Peak Hour DF 12:00 pm 10/24/2025 Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Page 319 of 455 C4paciAnalysi ty s Summary Sheets Year 2031 No -Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 320 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 W-A --op -4/ NO 11110 Lane Configurations'tt r 0 +tt r itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 34 217 203 63 178 0 55 610 78 © 609 69 Future Volume (vph) 34 217 203 63 178 0 55 610 78 0 609 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 245 0 0 205 140 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 120 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00' Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3762 1568 1752 3725 0 1770 5200 1599 0 3654 1583 Flt Permitted 0.499 0.499 0.400 Satd. Flow (perm) 948 3762 1568 920 3725 0 745 5200 1599 0 3654 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 253 223 134 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 330 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 5.6 4.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1 % 3% 3% 2% 0% 2% 5% 1 % 0% 4% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 37 236 221 68 193 0 60 663 85 0 662 75 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 1 69 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 1 6 9 8 38 12 25411 Detector Phase 6 6 6 1 6 9 1 69 3 38 38 25411 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 14.1 % 14.1 % 14.1 % 14.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 25.0 59.0 59.0 62.0 62.0 58.0 117.0 100.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 011 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.53 0.45 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.51 0.55 0.28 0.19 0.18 0.45 0.15 0.34 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 96.5 94.7 9.0 4.8 2.0 48.4 53.1 0.5 2.2 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 Total Delay (s/veh) 96.5 94.7 9.0 6.4 2.6 48.4 53.4 0.5 2.5 0.4 LOS F F A A A D D A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 56.5 3.6 47.4 2.3 Approach LOS E A D A Queue Length 50th (ft) 50 173 0 2 1 59 269 0 15 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 97 227 48 16 2 101 311 0 17 mo NB AM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202B,rhkhEbu1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 1 Page 321 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 19.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 38.0 52.0 21.0 46.0 38.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 11% 17% 24% 10% 21% 17% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB AM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202BjhkhEbi1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 2 Page 322 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO 11110 Internal Link Dist (ft) 3968 152 250 174 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 245 205 140 Base Capacity (vph) 116 461 402 246 998 340 1465 585 1943 792 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 84 514 0 0 0 695 367 Spillback Cap Reductn © 0 0 0 0 0 305 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 29.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.7% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10 1: IL 83 & Kensington Road of 4L= #201 #301 #101 #2011 #301 'V1 2 0%, 04 #201 #101 #201 08 # M V10201QV30 , il 1 01, 11"\ ", 1 NB AM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202BjhkhEbj1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 3 Page 323 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn NB AM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202B,rhkhEbuild Rhqn&day Mornin Page 4 Page 324 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations 0 "�tt r tO tO Traffic Volume (vph) 162 483 0 148 483 17 5 915 196 0 616 128 Future Volume (vph) 162 483 0 148 483 17 5 915 196 0 616 128 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 315 0 100 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 095 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.974 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3400 3585 0 3467 3585 1429 1805 5223 0 0 5080 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3400 3585 0 3467 3585 1429 1805 5223 0 0 5080 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 223 21 27 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3272 344 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.7 55.8 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3%° 6% 0% 1 % 6% 13%° 0%° 2% 1 % 0% 4% 8% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 498 0 153 498 18 5 1145 0 0 767 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 4 12 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 4 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 46.0 52.0 21.0 Total Split (%) 14.5% 20.9% 23.6%° 9.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 28.0 41.0 42.0 55.0 48.0 17.0 62.0 104.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.19 0.19 0.25 0.22 0.08 0.28 0.47 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.75 0.23 0.56 0.04 0.04 0.77 0.32 Control Delay (s/veh) 50.3 50.4 76.4 74.7 0.1 94.8 75.2 3.1 Queue Delay 1.6 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (s/veh) 51.9 52.2 76.4 74.7 0.1 94.8 75.2 3.2 LOS D D E E A F E A Approach LOS D E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 39 391 99 352 0 7 565 17 Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 468 140 422 0 25 622 21 NB AM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202B,rhkhEbu1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 5 Page 325 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 19.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 38.0 31.0 38.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 11% 17% 14% 17% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB AM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202BjhkhEbi1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 6 Page 326 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 NO 1111#W0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3192 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 Base Capacity (vph) 432 668 661 896 486 139 1487 2415 Starvation Cap Reductn 137 67 0 0 0 0 0 503 Spillback Cap Reductn © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 53.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 #101 #201 *3GV1 #2011 #301 �71QY3�2�#201 #301 #10,1 #2011 #301 �kl V10201QMV30 4mmorw 0 \9\ 1 V1 2 %004 #201 #101 #201 07 08 NB AM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202BjhkhEbj1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 7 Page 327 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 10/24/2025 NB AM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202B,rhkhEbuild Rhqn&day Mornin Page 8 Page 328 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations tt r tt r +tt +tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 215 80 15 166 86 62 1000 0 75 657 41 Future Volume (vph) 0 215 80 15 166 86 62 1000 0 75 657 41 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 170 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00' Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3725 1599 1805 3689 1553 1787 5250 0 1770 5353 1615 Flt Permitted 0.395 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3725 1599 750 3689 1553 1787 5250 0 1770 5353 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 193 253 253 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 337 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 1 % 0% 3% 4% 1 %Q 4°l 3% 2% 2% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 231 86 16 178 92 67 1075 0 81 706 44 Turn Type NA pm+ov Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 1 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 69 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 1 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4....0 Minimum Split (s) 19.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 19.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 25.0 38.0' Total Split(%) 11.4% 14.1 % 14.1 % 14.1 % 11.4% 17.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 34.0 57.0 27.0 27.0 25.0 108.0 153.0 21.0 59.0 34.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 026 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.49 0.70 0.10 0.27 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.15 0.17 0.39 0.23 0.08 0.29 0.48 0.49 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 23.1 0.6 91.9 91.8 1.3 11.9 0.7 104.E 69.3 0.4 Queue Delay 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 23.7 1.7 91.9 91.8 1.3 11.9 1.2 104.E 69.3 0.4 LOS C A F F A B A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 17.7 62.7 1.9 69.1 Approach LOS B E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 41 0 21 131 0 57 9 116 325 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 54 0 53 179 0 m70 9 186 373 0 NB AM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202B,rhkhEbu1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 9 Page 329 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 52.0 21.0 46.0 38.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 15% 24% 10% 21% 17% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB AM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202BjhkhEbi1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 10 Page 330 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO 11110 Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 257 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 575 557 92 452 400 877 3651 168 1435 463 Starvation Cap Reductn 120 323 0 0 0 0 1982 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 32.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 301: US-12 & Kensington Road #101 #201 *3GV1 #2011 #301 �71QY3�2�#201 #301 #10,1 #2011 #301 �kl V10201QMV30 4mmorw 0 \9\ 1 V1 2 %004 #201 #101 #201 07 1 14%4`* 1 08 NB AM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202BjhkhEbj1d Rhqn&day Mornin Page 11 Page 331 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn NB AM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202B,rhkhEbuild Rhqn&day Mornin Page 12 Page 332 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotive north access drive & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations fit tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1089 6 2 773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1089 6 2 773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1165 0 0 1577 1988 582 1406 1991 411 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1162 1162 - 827 827 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 415 827 - 579 1165 - Critical Hdwy - - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 607 - 0 75 62 461 101 61 595 Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 211 272 - 336 389 - Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 591 ; 389 - 473 271 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 607 - - 75 61 461 100 61 595 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 166 173 - 223 172 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 211 272 - 335 387 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 588 387 - 473 271 - HCM LOS A A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.004 - - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 11 - - - 0' HCM Lane LOS A B - - A NB AM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202B,rhkhEbuild Rhqn&day Mornin Page 1 Page 333 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9: J ust Ti res/Ki m ber Automotives south access d rive & U S-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations fit tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 1085 2 1 774 5 1 0 4 1 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 1085 2 1 774 5 1 0 4 1 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 829 0 0 1156 0 0 1573 1990 578 1410 1989 414 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1160 1160 - 828 828 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 414 831 - 581 1161 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 812 - - 611 - - 76 61 464 100 62 593 Stage 1 - - - - - - 211 272 - 336 388 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 592 387 - 471 272 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 812 - - 611 - - 75 61 464 99 61 593 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 166 172 - 221 172 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 211 271 - 335 388 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 590 386 - 465 271 - HCM LOS C C HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 0.002 - - 0.003 - - 0.005 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.7 10.9 - - 9.4 - - 21.4 HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - C NB AM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:39 am 10/24/202B,rhkhEbuild Rhqn&day Mornin Page 2 Page 334 of 455 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 No -Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 335 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 W-A --op -4/ NO 11110 Lane Configurations'tt r 0 +tt r itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 29 214 82 76 279 0 50 720 95 0 757 114 Future Volume (vph) 29 214 82 76 279 0 50 720 95 0 757 114 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 145 245 0 0 205 140 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 190 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00' Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3762 1599 1805 3762 0 1805 5406 1615 0 3762 1599 Flt Permitted 0.313 0.508 0.353 Satd. Flow (perm) 595 3762 1599 965 3762 0 671 5406 1615 0 3762 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 213 185 128 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 35 35 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 320 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 6.2 4.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1 % 1 % 0% 1 % 0% 0% 1 °l 0% 0% 1 % 1 % Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 30 223 85 79 291 0 52 750 99 0 789 119 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 1 6 9 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 1 6 9 8 38 12 25411 Detector Phase 6 6 6 1 6 9 1 69 3 38 38 25411 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 13.0% 13.0% 13.0% 11.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 26.0 26.0 24.0 60.0 60.0 76.6 77.4 74.4 131.0 114.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 010 0.26 0.26 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.57 0.50' v/c Ratio 0.45 0.52 0.24 0.31 0.30 0.15 0.41 0.15 0.37 0.14 Control Delay (s/veh) 117.6 101.1 1.6 4.1 2.1, 53.1 59.2 0.5 1.6 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.3 Total Delay (s/veh) 117.6 101.1 1.6 6.8 3.1 53.1 59.4 0.5 2.1 0.6 LOS F F A A A D E A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 77.5 3.9 52.5 1.9 Approach LOS E A D A Queue Length 50th (ft) 44 173 0 2 3 54 326 0 12 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 90 227 0 m2 3 95 369 0 13 m 1 NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2026jr 11d may Evenin Page 1 Page 336 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 49.0 55.0 21.0 27.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 21% 24% 9% 12% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2026jrhhM6u11d may Even Page 2 Page 337 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO 11110 Internal Link Dist (ft) 3968 152 240 174 Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 245 205 140 Base Capacity (vph) 67 425 357 251 981 336 1818 647 2142 857 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 98 446 0 0 0 838 412 Spillback Cap Reductn © 0 0 0 0 0 253 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 30.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10 1: IL 83 & Kensington Road #101 #201 4OM1 #201 #301 #1011020VA "001#201 #3M01 #201 #301 # '* 1t10201t2@301f301 oh, 1 0 \9\ 02R) V12 5 04 INS E ENEMA` #201 #101 #201 07 08 NB PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 101241202TojhhM6u1ld may Evenin Page 3 Page 338 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2O2FyhhM6uIld may Evenin Page 4 Page 339 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations 0 "�tt r tO tO Traffic Volume (vph) 201 548 0 178 665 17 23 806 207 0 906 207 Future Volume (vph) 201 548 0 178 665 17 23 806 207 0 906 207 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 315 0 100 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 095 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 0.850 0.969 0.972 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3502 3762 0 3433 3725 1524 1805 5249 0 0 5307 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3502 3762 0 3433 3725 1524 1805 5249 0 0 5307 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 213 29 33 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3272 344 Travel Time (s) 4.9 12.2 55.8 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 2% 2% 6%° 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 209 571 0 185 693 18 24 1056 0 0 1160 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 4 12 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 4 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 27.0 55.0 21.0 Total Split (%) 11.7% 11.7% 23.9%° 9.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 23.0 61.6 19.4 58.0 51.0 17.0 73.0 116.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.27 0.08 0.25 0.22 0.07 0.32 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.57 0.64 0.74 0.04 0.18 0.63 0.43 Control Delay (s/veh) 93.3 25.7 111.9 84.6 0.1 103.6 66.9 4.1 Queue Delay 4.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (s/veh) 98.1 26.1 111.9 84.6 0.1 103.6 66.9 4.2 LOS F C F F A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 45.4 88.5 67.7 4.2 Approach LOS D F E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 412 145 524 0 35 497 33 Queue Length 95th (ft) 121 494 194 606 0 74 549 36 NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/202FyhhM6u1ld may Evenin Page 5 Page 340 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 49.0 30.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 21% 13% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2026jrhhM6u11d may Evenin Page 6 Page 341 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 NO 1111#W0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3192 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 Base Capacity (vph) 350 1007 343 939 503 133 1685 2692 Starvation Cap Reductn 85 128 0 0 0 0 0 465 Spillback Cap Reductn © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 49.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 NB PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 101241202TojhhM6u1ld may Evenin Page 7 Page 342 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 10/24/2025 NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2O2FyhhM6uIld may Evenin Page 8 Page 343 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations tt r tt r +tt +tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 235 74 23 279 136 73 911 0 76 977 70 Future Volume (vph) 0 235 74 23 279 136 73 911 0 76 977 70 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 135 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 170 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00' Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3800 1615 1805 3800 1583 1805 5406 0 1787 5406 1583 Flt Permitted 0.347 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3800 1615 659 3800 1583 1805 5406 0 1787 5406 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 157 213 213 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 337 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%Q 1 °l 0% 1 % 1 % 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 242 76 24 288 140 75 939 0 78 1007 72 Turn Type NA pm+ov Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 1 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 69 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 1 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4....0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 27.0 49.0 Total Split(%) 11.7% 13.0% 13.0% 13.0% 11.7% 21.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Led/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 33.0 58.0 26.0 26.0 24.0 106.0 162.0 23.0 72.0 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 025 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.46 0.70 0.10 0.31 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.15 0.32 0.67 0.39 0.09 0.25 0.44 0.60 0.15 Control Delay (s/veh) 28.9 0.5 106.9 106.4 3.3 19.5 0.3 105.8 68.5 0.7 Queue Delay 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 29.6 1.7 106.9 106.4 3.3 19.5 0.7 105.8 68.5 0.7 LOS C A F F A B A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 23.0 74.5 2.1 66.7 Approach LOS C E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 0 34 225 0 85 3 115 482 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 0 74 286 0 136 3 184 534 0 NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2026jr 11d may Evenin Page 9 Page 344 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 55.0 21.0 27.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 24% 9% 12% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB PM 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2026jrhhM6u11d may Even Page 10 Page 345 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO 11110 Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 257 Turn Bay Length (ft) 135 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 545 524 74 429 355 831 3807 178 1692 481 Starvation Cap Reductn 109 310 0 0 0 0 2073 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 40.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8% ICU Level of Servic Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 301: US-12 & Kensington Road .O , ,1 #201 #301 " 1►' �', 1 1 20 A "0 1 #201 V12 5 201 07 M01 #201 #301 #1 1t10201t2@301f301 IM 04 101 #201 08 NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/202FyhhM6u1ld may Evenin Page 11 Page 346 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2O2FyhhM6uIld may Evenin Page 12 Page 347 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotive north access drives & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1008 0 1 1122 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1008 0 1 1122 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1096 0 0 1708 2317 548 1770 2317 610 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1096 1096 - 1222 1222 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 612 1222 - 548 1096 - Critical Hdwy - - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 633 - - 59 37 480 53 37 438 Stage 1 0 - - - - - 228 288 - 190 250 - Stage 2 0 - - - - - 447 250 - 488 288 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 633 - - 59 37 480 53 37 438 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 161 139 - 143 139 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 228 288 - 190 250 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 446 250 - 487 288 - HCM LOS B A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.002 - - - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.5 10.7 - - - - 0' HCM Lane LOS B B - - A NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2026jr 11d may Evenin Page 1 Page 348 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives south access drives & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1008 0 2 1120 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 1 1008 0 2 1120 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 1221 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 567 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 567 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) HCM Lane LOS 0 0 1096 0 0 1711 2323 548 1773 2321 610 - - - - - 1098 1098 - 1223 1223 - - - - - - 613 1225 - 550 1098 - - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 633 - - 59 37 480 52 37 437 - - - - - 227 287 - 190 250 - - - - - - 446 249 - 487 287 - - - 633 - - 58 37 480 52 37 437 - - - - - 160 138 - 142 138 - - - - - - 226 286 - 189 249 - - - - - - 442 248 - 484 286 - C C 0.009 0.003 - - 0.002 - - 0.013 20.2 10.7 - - 11.4 - - 19.1 C B - - B - C NB PM 25-265 -Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 9:47 am 10/24/2026jr 11d may Evenin Page 2 Page 349 of 455 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 No -Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour Page 350 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 W-A --op -4/ NO 11110 Lane Configurations'tt r 0 +tt r itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 43 223 87 96 216 0 26 589 101 © 736 84 Future Volume (vph) 43 223 87 96 216 0 26 589 101 0 736 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 245 0 0 205 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 165 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00' Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3800 1615 1805 3762 0 1805 5460 1615 0 3762 1599 Flt Permitted 0.482 0.522 0.364 Satd. Flow (perm) 916 3800 1615 992 3762 0 692 5460 1615 0 3762 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 245 213 147 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 35 35 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 310 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 6.0 4.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 230 90 99 223 0 27 607 104 0 759 87 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 1 6 9 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 1 6 9 8 38 12 25411 Detector Phase 6 6 6 1 6 9 1 69 3 38 38 25411 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 15.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 25.0 60.0 60.0 66.0 66.8 64.1 98.2 81.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 013 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.49 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.45 0.22 0.33 0.20 0.07 0.33 0.16 0.41 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 87.8 82.8 1.2 4.7 1.2 45.6 50.4 0.5 2.0 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.2 Total Delay (s/veh) 87.8 82.8 1.2 6.6 1.7 45.6 50.5 0.5 2.5 0.5 LOS F F A A A D D A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 63.2 3.2 43.3 2.3 Approach LOS E A D A Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 149 0 8 1 24 220 0 11 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 103 200 0 34 1 52 259 0 12 m 1 NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2 g6cNWB12ilR dday Middy Page 1 Page 351 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 31.0 41.0 20.0 30.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 13% 16% 21% 10% 15% 21% 4% 4% 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2Bq6cNWB12ilR dday Middy Page 2 Page 352 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO 11110 Internal Link Dist (ft) 3968 152 230 174 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 245 205 145 Base Capacity (vph) 123 513 416 297 1128 372 1822 662 1846 736 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 102 572 0 0 0 592 293 Spillback Cap Reductn © 0 0 0 0 0 333 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 25.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.8% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10 1: IL 83 & Kensington Road W*201 #201 #301 #101 #201 #301 + �12 0) \-+ i , I \-+ 04 #201 #101 #201 07 08 191ilwit I . 9.101 NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2S?6cNwB12ilR dday Middc- Page 3 Page 353 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2 ?6cNwBI2ilR dday Middc Page 4 Page 354 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations 0 "�tt r tO tO Traffic Volume (vph) 180 451 0 235 573 43 58 729 248 0 722 209 Future Volume (vph) 180 451 0 235 573 43 58 729 248 0 722 209 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 305 0 100 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 095 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 0.850 0.962 0.966 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3502 3762 0 3502 3762 1615 1805 5214 0 0 5234 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3502 3762 0 3502 3762 1615 1805 5214 0 0 5234 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 213 42 51 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3227 344 Travel Time (s) 4.9 12.2 55.0 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 1% 0% 0% 1% 0%° 0% 1% 0% 0% 1%° 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 188 470 0 245 597 45 60 1017 0 0 970 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA NA Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 411 12 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 15.0% 15.0% 10.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None Act Effct Green (s) 25.8 48.7 21.3 44.2 44.2 16.0 54.0 98.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.24 0.11 0.22 0.22 0.98 0.27 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.51 0.66 0.72 0.09 0.42 0.71 0.37 Control Delay (s/veh) 43.7 29.7 94.3 77.9 0.3 96.9 66.2 2.6 Queue Delay 1.7 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.4 30.7 94.3 77.9 0.3 96.9 66.2 2.7 LOS D C F E A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 34.9 78.5 67.9 2.7 Approach LOS C E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 39 296 162 392 0 77 434 16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 53 371 211 467 0 135 489 18 NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2 g6cNWB12ilR dday Middy Page 5 Page 355 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 31.0 41.0 31.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 13% 16% 21% 16% 21% 4% 4% 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2Bq6cNWB12ilR dday Middy Page 6 Page 356 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 10/24/2025 NO 1111#W0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3147 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 Base Capacity (vph) 455 916 455 830 522 144 1438 2590 Starvation Cap Reductn 141 222 0 0 0 0 0 565 Spillback Cap Reductn © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 46.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.5% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2S?6cNwB12ilR dday Middc- Page 7 Page 357 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 10/24/2025 NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2 ?6cNwBI2ilR dday Middc Page 8 Page 358 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 &Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations tt r tt r +tt +tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 257 67 51 240 110 80 884 0 72 821 128 Future Volume (vph) 0 257 67 51 240 110 80 884 0 72 821 128 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 135 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 170 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00' Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3800 1615 1805 3800 1599 1805 5406 0 1805 5406 1615 Flt Permitted 0.362 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3800 1615 688 3800 1599 1805 5406 0 1805 5406 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 180 245 245 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 330 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 0% 1 °l 0% 0% 1 % 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 271 71 54 253 116 84 931 0 76 864 135 Turn Type NA pm+ov Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 1 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 69 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 1 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4....0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 26.0 31.0' Total Split(%) 13.0% 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 13.0% 15.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Led/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 34.0 58.0 27.0 27.0 25.0 94.0 132.0 22.0 53.0 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 029 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.47 0.66 0.11 0.27 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.12 0.59 0.49 0.28 0.10 0.26 0.38 0.60 0.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 25.0 0.4 107.4 83.8 1.7 8.6 0.6 88.9 66.4 1.9 Queue Delay 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 25.6 1.4 107.4 83.8 1.7 8.6 1.0 88.9 66.4 1.9 LOS C A F F A A A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 20.6 64.3 1.7 59.9 Approach LOS C E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 0 68 165 0 55 6 95 371 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 68 0 #132 218 0 m71 6 158 423 0 NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2 g6cNWB12ilR dday Middy Page 9 Page 359 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 41.0 20.0 30.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 15% 21% 10% 15% 21% 4% 4% 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2Bq6cNwBi2ilR dday Middy Page 10 Page 360 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 NO 11110 Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 250 Turn Bay Length (ft) 135 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 646 596 92 513 414 842 3550 198 1432 429 Starvation Cap Reductn 142 370 0 0 0 0 1939 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 35.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.6% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 301: US-12 & Kensington Road W*201 #201 #301 #101 #201 #301 + �12 0) \-+ i , I \-+ 04 #201 #101 #201 07 1 08 191ilwit I . 9.101 NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2S?6cNwBi2ilR dday Middc- Page 11 Page 361 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 10/24/2025 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2 ?6cNwBi2ilR dday Middc Page 12 Page 362 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives north access drives & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations 0 tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 997 0 0 1020 4 0 0 0 0' 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 4 997 0 0 1020 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 1113 0 0 - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 623 - - 0 Stage 1 - - - 0 Stage 2 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 623 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - HCM LOS 0 1647 2205 542 1661 2203 557 - 1092 1092 - 1111 1111 - - 554 1113 551 1092 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 65 44 485 64 44 474 - - 229 289 - 223 283 - - - 484 282 - 486 289 - - 65 43 485 63 44 474 165 148 - 163 150 - 226 286 - 223 283 - 484 282 482 286 A A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.007 - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 10.8 - - 0' HCM Lane LOS A - B A NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2 ?6cNWBI2ilR dday Middy Page 1 Page 363 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives south access drives & US-12 10/24/2025 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 997 0 3 1020 1 1 0 8 1 0 3 Future Vol, veh/h 0 997 0 3 1020 1 1 0 8 1 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1084 0 0 1645 2200 542 1658 2199 555 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1084 1084 - 1116 1116 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 561 1116 - 542 1084 - Critical Hdwy - - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 639 - - 66 44 485 64 44 475 Stage 1 0 - - - - - 232 291 - 221 281 - Stage 2 0 - - - - - 480 281 - 492 291 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 639 - - 65 44 485 63 44 475 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 167 150 - 161 149 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 232 291 - 220 279 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 473 279 - 483 291 - HCM LOS B C HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.005 - - - - 0.014 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.2 10.7 - - - - 16.4 HCM Lane LOS B B - - C NB SAT 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect 10:03 am 10/24/2 ?6cNWBI2ilR dday Middy Page 2 Page 364 of 455 C4paci Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 Total Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 365 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 &Kensington Road 06/03/2026 W-A Lane Configurations'tt r 0 r itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 34 219 203 63 178 0 57 623 81 0 609 69 Future Volume (vph) 34 219 203 63 178 0 57 623 81 0 609 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 245 0 0 205 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 170 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 100 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3762 1568 1752 3725 0 1770 5200 1599 0 3654 1583 Flt Permitted 0.499 0.497 0.400 Satd. Flow (perm) 948 3762 1568 917 3725 0 745 5200 1599 0 3654 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 253 223 134 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 330 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 5.6 4.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 1% 3% 3% 2% 0%° 2% 5% 1% 0% 4%° 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 37 238 221 68 193 0 62 677 88 0 662 75 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 1 69 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 1 6 9 8 38 12 25411 Detector Phase 6 6 6 169 169 3 38 38 25411 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 14.1 % 14.1 % 14.1 % 11.8% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 25.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 55.0 123.0 106.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 011 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.25 0.56 0.48' v/c Ratio 0.32 0.52 0.55 0.28 0.19 0.21 0.49 0.16 0.32 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 96.5 94.8 9.0 4.8 2.0 50.3 55.7 0.6 2.0 0....2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 Total Delay (s/veh)' 96.5 94.8 9.0 6.4 2.6 50.3 56.0 0.6 2.3 0.4 LOS F F A A A D E A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 56.7 3.6 49.7 2.1 Approach LOS E A D A Queue Length 50th (ft) 50 175 0 2 1 62 280 0 15 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 97 230 48 16 2 105 322 0 17 m0 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 366 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 19.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 43.0 56.0 18.0 41.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 11% 20% 25% 8% 19% 19% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 367 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 3968 152 250 174 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 245 205 145 Base Capacity (vph) 116 461 402 245 998 302 1394 567 2042 832 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 83 514 0 0 0 731 418 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 30.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.7% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10 1: IL 83 & Kensington Road #101 #201 *3G'D11 #201 #301 14J .10\9\ Oi2 #101t1,020'12 MNOV201 A JjV1%25 #2011 07 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour 1 #201 #301 #1 M0V2030:930 04 11 #101 #201 1 08 Synchro 12 Report Page 368 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 369 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations 0 "�tt r tO tO Traffic Volume (vph) 170 488 0 154 483 17 5 925 196 0 616 128 Future Volume (vph) 170 488 0 154 483 17 5 925 196 0 616 128 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 315 0 100 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 095 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.974 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3400 3585 0 3467 3585 1429 1805 5223 0 0 5080 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3400 3585 0 3467 3585 1429 1805 5223 0 0 5080 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 223 21 29 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3272 344 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.7 55.8 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3%° 6% 0% 1 % 6% 13%° 0% 2% 1 % 0% 4% 8% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 175 503 0 159 498 18 5 1156 0 0 767 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 4 12 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 4 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 41.0 56.0 18.0 Total Split (%) 11.8% 18.6% 25.5%° 8.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 22.0 44.0 37.0 59.0 52.0 14.0 64.0 109.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.20 0.17 0.27 0.24 0.06 0.29 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.70 0.27 0.52 0.04 0.04 0.75 0.30 Control Delay (s/veh) 77.5 43.5 81.2 70.7 0.1 97.8 73.2 2.8 Queue Delay 2.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (s/veh) 79.6 44.1 81.2 70.7 0.1 97.8 73.2 2.9 LOS E D F E A F E A Approach LOS D E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 58 390 106 343 0 7 564 16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 97 466 149 412 0 25 622 19 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 370 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 19.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 43.0 31.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 11% 20% 14% 19% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 371 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 t CA *J Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3192 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 Base Capacity (vph) 340 717 583 961 508 114 1534 2531 Starvation Cap Reductn 72 46 0 0 0 0 0 597 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 52.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.7% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 #101 #201 *3G'D1 #2011 #301 #101t1020*12 MN0V201 MM1 #201 #301 # V1020V20301t30 \ A 1 0 \9C 04 , It 1 #2011 #101 #201 07 08 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 372 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 06/03/2026 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 373 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 &Kensington Road 06/03/2026 3F *144. Lane Configurations tt r tt r +tt +tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 218 82 19 166 86 62 1016 0 75 657 41 Future Volume (vph) 0 218 82 19 166 86 62 1016 0 75 657 41 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 120 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 190 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 100 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3725 1599 1805 3689 1553 1787 5250 0 1770 5353 1615 Flt Permitted 0.389 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3725 1599 739 3689 1553 1787 5250 0 1770 5353 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 193 253 253 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 337 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 2% 1% 0% 3% 4%° 1% 4% 3% 2% 2% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 234 88 20 178 92 67 1092 0 81 706 44 Turn Type NA pm+ov Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 1 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 69 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 1 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 19.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 19.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 25.0 430 Total Split (%) 11.4% 14.1 % 14.1 % 14.1 % 11.4% 19.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 34.0 57.0 27.0 27.0 25.0 103.0 153.0 21.0 64.0 39.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 026 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.47 0.70 0.10 0.29 0.18' v/c Ratio 0.41 0.16 0.22 0.39 0.23 0.08 0.30 0.48 0.45 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 23.6 0.6 94.0 91.8 1.3 15.2 0.7 104.6 64.9 04 Queue Delay 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 24.2 1.7 94.0 91.8 1.3 15.2 1.2 104.6 64.9 0.4 LOS C A F F A B A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 18.1 63.3 2.0 65.3 Approach LOS B E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 0 27 131 0 66 9 116 315 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 56 0 62 179 0 m82 9 186 362 0 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 374 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 56.0 18.0 41.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 25% 8% 19% 19% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 375 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 3F NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 257 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 575 557 90 452 400 836 3651 168 1557 494 Starvation Cap Reductn 120 321 0 0 0 0 1931 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 220 Actuated Cycle Length: 220 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 31.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.2% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 301: US-12 & Kensington Road oil #2011 � 07 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour 1 #201 #301 #1 M0V2030:930 04 1 #101 #201 fioo 1 08 Synchro 12 Report Page 376 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 377 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 3: 1 L 83 & Site Access Drive 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations r ttt tt Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 16 744 18 0 876 Future Vol, veh/h 0 18 744 18 0 876 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 414 0 0 - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 502 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 502 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.039 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 12.5 - HCM Lane LOS B - 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 378 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 5: Site Access Drive & US-1 2 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol, veh/h 1095 22 0 773 0 14 Future Vol, veh/h 1095 22 0 773 0 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 607 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 377 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 377 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15 - - - HCM Lane LOS B - - 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 379 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotive north access drive & US-12 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations fit tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1103 6 2 773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1103 6 2 773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1180 0 0 1592 2003 590 1413 2006 411 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1177 1177 - 827 827 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 415 827 - 587 1180 - Critical Hdwy - - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 599 - 0 73 60 456 100 60 595 Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 206 267 - 336 389 - Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 591 389 - 468 266 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 599 - - 73 60 456 99 60 595 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 163 171 - 221 169 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 206 267 - 335 387 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 588 387 - 468 266 - HCM LOS A A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.004 - - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 11 - - - 0 HCM Lane LOS A B - - A 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 380 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9 : Just Tires/Ki m ber Automotives south access drive & US-1 2 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations fit tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 1099 2 1 774 5 1 0 4 1 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 1099 2 1 774 5 1 0 4 1 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 829 0 0 1171 0 0 1588 2005 586 1417 2004 414 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1174 1174 - 828 828 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 414 831 - 589 1176 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9' Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 812 - - 604 - - 74 60 459 99 60 593 Stage 1 - - - - - - 207 268 - 336 388 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 592 387 - 467 268 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 812 - - 604 - - 73 60 459 97 60 593 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 163 170 - 220 170 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 206 267 - 335 388 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 590 386 - 460 267 - HCM LOS C C HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 0.002 - - 0.003 - - 0.005 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.9 11 - - 9.4 - - 21.5 HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - C 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Page 381 of 455 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 Total Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 382 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 &Kensington Road 06/03/2026 W-A NO ��eIllo�f Lane Configurations'tt r 0 +tt r itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 29 216 82 76 279 0 53 744 101 0 757 114 Future Volume (vph) 29 216 82 76 279 0 53 744 101 0 757 114 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 245 0 0 205 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 170 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3762 1599 1805 3762 0 1805 5406 1615 0 3762 1599 Flt Permitted 0.313 0.506 0.353 Satd. Flow (perm) 595 3762 1599 961 3762 0 671 5406 1615 0 3762 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 213 185 128 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 35 35 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 320 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 6.2 4.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1 % 1 % 0% 1 % 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 30 225 85 79 291 0 55 775 105 0 789 119 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 1 6 9 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 1 6 9 8 38 12 25411 Detector Phase 6 6 6 1 6 9 1 69 3 38 38 25411 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 13.0%0 13.0% 13.0% 11.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Led/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 26.0 26.0 24.0 60.0 60.0 76.3 77.1 74.0 131.0 114.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 010 0.26 0.26 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.57 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.53 0.24 0.32 0.30 0.16 0.43 0.16 0.37 0.14 Control Delay (s/veh) 117.6 101.2 1.6 4.1 2.1 53.2 59.7 0.5 1.6 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.3 Total Delay (s/veh)' 117.6 101.2 1.6 6.9 3.1 53.2 59.8 0.5 2.1 0.6 LOS F F A A A D E A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 77.7 3.9 52.7 1.9 Approach LOS E A D A Queue Length 50th (ft) 44 174 0 2 3 58 338 0 12 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 90 230 0 m2 3 99 382 0 13 m 1 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 383 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 49.0 55.0 21.0 27.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 21% 24% 9% 12% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 384 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 3968 152 240 174 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 245 205 145 Base Capacity (vph) 67 425 357 250 981 335 1811 644 2142 857 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 98 446 0 0 0 841 412 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 30.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10 1: IL 83 & Kensington Road #101 #201 4OM1 #201 #301 #1011020VA "001#201 #3U01 #201 #301 #1 V1020V20301*)l INS ohl 0 \9\ 02R) V12 5 04 ENEMA, #201 #101, #201 07 08 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 385 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 386 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations 0 "�tt r tO tO Traffic Volume (vph) 216 557 0 187 665 17 23 821 207 0 906 207 Future Volume (vph) 216 557 0 187 665 17 23 821 207 0 906 207 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 315 0 100 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 095 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 0.850 0.970 0.972 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3502 3762 0 3433 3725 1524 1805 5254 0 0 5307 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3502 3762 0 3433 3725 1524 1805 5254 0 0 5307 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 213 28 33 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3272 344 Travel Time (s) 4.9 12.2 55.8 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 1% 0% 2% 2% 6% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 225 580 0 195 693 18 24 1071 0 0 1160 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 4 12 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 4 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 27.0 55.0 21.0 Total Split (%) 11.7% 11.7% 23.9%° 9.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 23.0 61.0 20.0 58.0 51.0 17.0 73.0 116.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.27 0.09 0.25 0.22 0.07 0.32 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.58 0.66 0.74 0.04 0.18 0.64 0.43 Control Delay (s/veh) 98.2 25.9 112.2 84.6 0.1 103.6 67.3 4.1 Queue Delay 6.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (s/veh) 104.6 26.3 112.2 84.6 0.1 103.6 67.3 4.2 LOS F C F F A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 48.2 88.8 68.1 4.2 Approach LOS D F E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 87 422 153 524 0 35 506 33 Queue Length 95th (ft) 132 502 203 606 0 74 559 36 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 387 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 49.0 30.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 21% 13% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 388 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 t CA *J Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3192 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 Base Capacity (vph) 350 998 343 939 503 133 1686 2692 Starvation Cap Reductn 81 112 0 0 0 0 0 465 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 50.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.6% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 #101 #201 4OM1 #201 #301 #1011020VA "001#201 #3U01 #201 #301 #1 V1020V20301*)l INS ohl 0 \9\ 02R) V12 5 04 1 ##101, #201 07 08 201L1111111 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 389 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 06/03/2026 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 390 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 &Kensington Road 06/03/2026 3F *144. Lane Configurations tt r tt r +tt +tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 241 76 29 279 136 73 935 0 76 977 70 Future Volume (vph) 0 241 76 29 279 136 73 935 0 76 977 70 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 120 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 190 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 100 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3800 1615 1805 3800 1583 1805 5406 0 1787 5406 1583 Flt Permitted 0.336 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3800 1615 638 3800 1583 1805 5406 0 1787 5406 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 157 213 213 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 337 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0%° 0% 0% 0% 0% 2%° 0% 1% 0% 1% 1%° 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 248 78 30 288 140 75 964 0 78 1007 72' Turn Type NA pm+ov Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 1 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 69 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 1 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 27.0 49.0 Total Split (%) 11.7% 13.0% 13.0% 13.0% 11.7% 21.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 33.0 58.0 26.0 26.0 24.0 106.0 162.0 23.0 72.0 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 025 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.46 0.70 0.10 0.31 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.15 0.42 0.67 0.39 0.09 0.25 0.44 0.60 0.15 Control Delay (s/veh) 29.9 0.6 113.7 106.4 3.3 19.2 0.3 105.8 68.5 07 Queue Delay 0.8 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 30.7 1.8 113.7 106.4 3.3 19.2 0.7 105.8 68.5 0.7 LOS C A F F A B A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 23.8 75.3 2.0 66.7 Approach LOS C E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 0 43 225 0 85 3 115 482 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 71 0 89 286 0 135 2 184 534 0 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 391 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 55.0 21.0 27.0 53.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 12% 24% 9% 12% 23% 3% 3% 3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 392 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 3F NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 257 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 545 524 72 429 355 831 3807 178 1692 481 Starvation Cap Reductn 109 307 0 0 0 0 2059 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 230 Actuated Cycle Length: 230 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 40.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.0% ICU Level of Servic Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 1 1 20 2 001#20 V12 1 #20. 07 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour 01 #201 #301 #V 1 0 2 0 3 l IM 04 JJ, lei .0 #20. ' 08 Synchro 12 Report Page 393 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 394 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 3: 1 L 83 & Site Access Drive 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations r tO tt Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 33 864 26 0 915 Future Vol, veh/h 0 33 864 26 0 915 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 484 0 0 - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 453 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 453 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.079 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 13.6 - HCM Lane LOS B - 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 395 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 5: U S-12 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol, veh/h 1008 32 0 1122 0 27 Future Vol, veh/h 1008 32 0 1122 0 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 565 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 401 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 401 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.7 - - - HCM Lane LOS B - - 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 396 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotive north access drives & US-12 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1035 0 1 1122 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1035 0 1 1122 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1125 0 0 1737 2347 563 1784 2347 610 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1125 1125 - 1222 1222 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 612 1222 - 563 1125 - Critical Hdwy - - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 617 - - 56 36 470 52 36 438 Stage 1 0 - - - - - 218 278 - 190 250 - Stage 2 0 - - - - - 447 250 - 479 278 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 617 - - 56 36 470 51 36 438 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 156 136 - 142 136 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 218 278 - 190 250 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 446 250 - 477 278 - HCM LOS B A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.002 - - - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.7 10.8 - - - - 0' HCM Lane LOS B B - - A 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 397 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives south access drives & US-12 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1035 0 2 1120 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 1 1035 0 2 1120 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 1221 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 567 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 567 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) HCM Lane LOS 0 0 1125 0 0 1740 2352 563 1788 2351 610 - - - - - 1127 1127 - 1223 1223 - - - - - - 613 1225 - 565 1127 - - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 617 - - 56 35 470 51 35 437 - - - - - 218 278 - 190 250 - - - - - - 446 249 - 477 278 - - - 617 - - 55 35 470 51 35 437 - - - - - 154 135 - 141 135 - - - - - - 217 277 - 189 249 - - - - - - 442 248 - 475 277 - C C 0.009 0.004 - - 0.002 - - 0.013 20.6 10.9 - - 11.4 - - 19.2 C B - - B - C 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Page 398 of 455 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 Total Projected Saturday Midday Peak Hour Page 399 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 &Kensington Road 06/03/2026 W-A NO ��eIllo�f Lane Configurations'tt r 0 +tt r itit r Traffic Volume (vph) 43 226 87 96 216 0 29 620 109 0 736 84 Future Volume (vph) 43 226 87 96 216 0 29 620 109 0 736 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 245 0 0 205 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 170 25 300 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3800 1615 1805 3762 0 1805 5460 1615 0 3762 1599 Flt Permitted 0.482 0.519 0.364 Satd. Flow (perm) 916 3800 1615 986 3762 0 692 5460 1615 0 3762 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 245 213 147 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 35 35 Link Distance (ft) 4048 232 310 254 Travel Time (s) 92.0 5.3 6.0 4.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% ' 0% 1°% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 233 90 99 223 0 30 639 112 0 759 87 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 1 6 9 3 38 25411 Permitted Phases 6 6 1 6 9 8 38 12 25411 Detector Phase 6 6 6 1 6 9 1 69 3 38 38 25411 25411 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 15.5%0 15.5% 15.5% 15.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Led/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 25.0 60.0 60.0 65.8 66.6 63.8 98.0 81.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 013 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.49 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.45 0.22 0.34 0.20 0.08 0.35 0.17 0.41 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 87.8 82.9 1.2 4.8 1.2 45.8 50.8 0.6 2.0 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.2 Total Delay (s/veh)' 87.8 82.9 1.2 6.7 1.7 45.8 50.9 0.6 2.5 0.5 LOS F F A A A D D A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 63.5 3.3 43.5 2.3 Approach LOS E A D A Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 151 0 9 1 27 233 0 11 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 103 203 0 35 1 56 273 0 12 m 1 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 400 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 31.0 41.0 20.0 30.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 13% 16% 21% 10% 15% 21% 4% 4% 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 401 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 3968 152 230 174 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 245 205 145 Base Capacity (vph) 123 513 416 295 1128 372 1818 660 1843 735 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 102 572 0 0 0 597 293 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 335 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 26.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10 1: IL 83 & Kensington Road W*201 #201 #301 #101 #201 #301 + V12 0) 10 04 xwmmm1 #201 #101, #201 07 08 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 402 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 101: IL 83 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 403 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations 0 "�tt r tO +tt Traffic Volume (vph) 199 463 0 247 573 43 58 749 248 0 722 209' Future Volume (vph) 199 463 0 247 573 43 58 749 248 0 722 209 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 40 160 305 0 100 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 120 155 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 095 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 0.850 0.963 0.966 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3502 3762 0 3502 3762 1615 1805 5219 0 0 5234 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3502 3762 0 3502 3762 1615 1805 5219 0 0 5234 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 245 41 51 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 254 626 3227 344 Travel Time (s) 4.9 12.2 55.0 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% ' 0% 1%° 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 207 482 0 257 597 45 60 1038 0 0 970 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 3 811 7 411 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Permitted Phases 4 12 Detector Phase 3 811 7 411 4 5 2 512 1 2 6 9 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 22.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 41.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 15.0% 15.0% 20.5%° 10.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 26.0 48.2 21.8 44.0 37.0 16.0 54.0 98.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.24 0.11 0.22 0.19 0.08 0.27 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.53 0.67 0.72 0.09 0.42 0.72 0.37 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.0 29.8 94.6 78.1 0.3 96.9 66.8 2.6 Queue Delay 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (s/veh) 47.0 30.8 94.6 78.1 0.3 96.9 66.8 2.7 LOS D C F E A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 35.7 78.9 68.4 2.7 Approach LOS D E E A Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 305 171 392 0 77 446 16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 381 220 467 0 135 502 18 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 404 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 31.0 31.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 13% 16% 16% 21% 4% 4% 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 405 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & US-12 06/03/2026 t CA *J Internal Link Dist (ft) 174 546 3147 264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 40 160 Base Capacity (vph) 455 907 455 827 498 144 1439 2590 Starvation Cap Reductn 134 207 0 0 0 0 0 565 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 47.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 201: IL 83 & US-12 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 406 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 201: IL 83 & U S-12 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 06/03/2026 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 407 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 &Kensington Road 06/03/2026 3F *144. Lane Configurations tt r tt r +tt +tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 265 70 59 240 110 80 916 0 72 821 128 Future Volume (vph) 0 265 70 59 240 110 80 916 0 72 821 128 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 120 170 95 0 130 40 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 190 65 125 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 100 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3800 1615 1805 3800 1599 1805 5406 0 1805 5406 1615 Flt Permitted 0.349 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3800 1615 663 3800 1599 1805 5406 0 1805 5406 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 180 245 245 Link Speed (mph) 30 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 232 4479 344 330 Travel Time (s) 5.3 87.3 5.9 5.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%° 0% 1% 0% ' 0% 1%° 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 279 74 62 253 116 84 964 0 76 864 135 Turn Type NA pm+ov Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Protected Phases 69 1 6 34512 2345 1 12 Permitted Phases 69 6 6 11 12 2 Detector Phase 69 1 6 6 6 34512 2345 1 12 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 26.0 310 Total Split (%) 13.0% 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 13.0% 15.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 34.0 58.0 27.0 27.0 25.0 94.0 132.0 22.0 53.0 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 029 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.47 0.66 0.11 0.27 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.12 0.70 0.49 0.28 0.10 0.27 0.38 0.60 0.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 26.0 0.4 119.1 83.8 1.7 8.3 0.6 88.9 66.4 1.9 Queue Delay 0.7 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 26.7 1.4 119.1 83.8 1.7 8.3 1.0 88.9 66.4 1.9' LOS C A F F A A A F E A Approach Delay (s/veh) 21.4 66.8 1.6 59.9 Approach LOS C E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 0 79 165 0 53 6 95 371 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 0 #164 218 0 m69 6 158 423 0 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 408 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 10.0 10.0 22.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 41.0 20.0 30.0 41.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (%) 15% 21% 10% 15% 21% 4% 4% 4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay (s/veh) Queue Delay Total Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 409 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 3F NO ��eIllo�f Internal Link Dist (ft) 152 4399 264 250 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 170 95 130 40 Base Capacity (vph) 646 596 89 513 414 848 3567 198 1432 429 Starvation Cap Reductn 139 365 0 0 0 0 1925 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 35.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Servici Analysis Period (min) 15 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 301: US-12 & Kensington Road W*201 #201 #301 #101 #201 #301 + V12 0) 10 Vui 04 xwmmm� #201 #101 #201 07 08 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 410 of 455 Lanes and Geometrics 301: US-12 & Kensington Road 06/03/2026 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 411 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 3: 1 L 83 & Site Access Drive 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Lane Configurations r tO tt Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 42 716 35 0 919 Future Vol, veh/h 0 42 716 35 0 919 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 408 0 0 - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 506 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 506 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.09 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 12.8 - HCM Lane LOS B - 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 412 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 5: U S-12 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations tO tt r Traffic Vol, veh/h 1002 43 0 1020 0 35 Future Vol, veh/h 1002 43 0 1020 0 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 568 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 399 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 399 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15 - - - HCM Lane LOS B - - 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 413 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 6: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives north access drives & US-12 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations 0 tit Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 1032 0 0 1020 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 4 1032 0 0 1020 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 1113 0 0 - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 623 - - 0 Stage 1 - - - 0 Stage 2 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 623 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - HCM LOS 0 1685 2243 561 1680 2241 557 - - 1130 1130 - 1111 1111 - - - 554 1113 - 570 1130 - - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 61 ; 41 471 62 42 474 - - 217 277 - 223 283 - - - 484; 282 - 474 277 - - - 61 41 471 61 41 474 - - 158 145 - 161 146 - - - 215 274 - 223 283 - - - 484 282 - 469 274 - A A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.007 - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 10.8 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS A - B A 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 414 of 455 HCM 7th TWSC 9: Just Tires/Kimber Automotives south access drives & US-12 06/03/2026 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations 0 0 Y Y Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1032 0 3 1020 1 1 0 8 1 0 3 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1032 0 3 1020 1 1 0 8 1 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0- Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1122 0 0 1683 2238 561 1677 2238 555 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1122 1122 - 1116 1116 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 561 1116 - 561 1122 - Critical Hdwy - - - 414 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 618 - - 61 ; 42 471 62 42 475 Stage 1 0 - - - - - 219 279 - 221 281 - Stage 2 0 - - - - - 480 281 - 480 279 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 618 - - 61 41 471 60 42 475 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 160 146 - 160 146 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 219 279 - 220 279 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 473 279 - 471 279 - HCM LOS B C HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.005 - - - - 0.014 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.5 10.9 - - - - 16.5 HCM Lane LOS B B - - C 25-265 - Commercial Development - Mt Prospect Synchro 12 Report Projected Satuday Midday Peak Hour Page 415 of 455 I , soun� scale om ngine�Bring August 21, 2026 Ms. Samantha Burgner c/o Mr. Steven Barrett E1 Car Wash Project Manager sbur ner elcarwash.com (248) 983-5429 Direct sbarrettkalrigusa. com v .e ALRIG USA 30200 Telegraph Road Suite 205 Bingham Farms, MI 48025 Subject: Sound Propagation Assessment for Proposed E1 Car Wash 1 E. Rand Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois Dear Ms. Burgner: Soundscape Engineering has completed an acoustics assessment for the proposed El Car Wash at 1 E. Rand Road in Mount Prospect, Illinois. This report documents the ambient sound level measurements, predictions of car wash -related sound at neighboring properties, and our opinion on compliance with the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) regulations (35 111. Adm. Code Parts 900/901/910). The assessment modeled the "worst -case" conditions (blowers on with entrance and exit doors open and multiple vehicles using the outdoor vacuums) for comparison to the ordinance, with and without mitigation. 1. Executive Summary The Village of Mount Prospect does not have an absolute sound level cited for compliance, so we have compared our prediction to the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) regulation, which applies to all jurisdictions in the state. This regulation limits the unweighted sound level in nine octave bands. The proposed El Car Wash is expected to operate daily from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM, which falls within the hours defined as "daytime" by the IPCB. We used the commercially -available sound propagation modeling software, SoundPLAN, to evaluate the proposed design. Soundscape based the analysis on measurement data from two existing El Car Wash sites in Brighton and Madison Heights, both in Michigan, measurement data of the site ambient, and the manufacturer's dryer sound data. We understand that in this site plan iteration, no vacuum pumps will be inside the vacuum building. One set will be located in an enclosure with a roof to the north of the vacuum building and another set will be to the east of the vacuum building. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 . (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 416 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 August 21, 2026 Page 2 of 35 SoundPLAN modeling indicates that the proposed car wash, with the 80 horsepower Stealth Predator Ultra -Quiet dryers, the three proposed screen walls, and all tunnel and vacuum building doors open, falls short of the IPCB requirements at some locations in the higher frequencies. However, when assessed per the IPCB regulation with the predicted ambient condition (based on measured data at on -property locations) added to the predicted car wash levels, all residential locations meet the regulation, but three commercial locations do not. Mitigation steps were evaluated and recommendations made. The 30 horsepower Stealth Predator Ultra -Quiet dryers were also evaluated to determine whether the barrier walls could be shortened or eliminated. Per our analysis, the recommended mitigation steps meet the IPCB regulation at the commercial locations as well as the residential locations and are as follows: • Install 30 horsepower dryers with the Stealth Predator Ultra -Quiet system, and • Extend the 8-ft tall barrier wall at the south property line eastward to 200 feet long total. Note that with the 30 horsepower dryers, the screen wall at the tunnel entrance is not required and the screen wall at the tunnel exit may be shortened to 20 feet long, extending from the building southward. Additionally, the sound absorbing acoustical panels and the screen wall at the vacuum building can be eliminated. 2. Background The proposed car wash includes the following buildings and equipment: • 4,830 sq-ft car wash tunnel • 11,016 sq-ft enclosed vacuum structure with sixteen vacuum stations inside, • a pair of vacuum pumps inside a roofed enclosure on the north side of the vacuum building • twelve outdoor vacuum stations • a pair of vacuum pumps within a screen wall on the east side of the building. The proposed site layout is shown in Figure 1. The loudest sound source is the dryer system followed by the vacuum pumps. We assume the operating hours are 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM daily. A glossary of acoustical terminology is included in Appendix A to assist in understanding the discussion. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 417 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 3 of 35 Figure 1: Site Plan of Proposed Car Wash Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 418 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 4 of 35 3. Instrumentation Measurements were conducted using an NTi Audio XL2-TA acoustic analyzer with an MC230 microphone and MA220 preamp, a Class 1 Type Approved system compliant with IEC 61672 and ANSI S 1.4. This equipment has been calibrated within the past two years per its regular schedule to a reference traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) by the equipment manufacturer or a laboratory in the business of providing calibration services. The sensitivity of the sound level meter was checked using a Larson Davis CAL200 handheld sound level calibrator conforming to the Class 1 requirements of IEC 60942 and ANSI S 1.40 before the measurement session. 4. Ordinance and Criteria The property for the proposed El Car Wash is contained within the yellow -outlined area in Figure 2. The green and light brown areas to the south and west are residential. Other surrounding businesses are primarily retail or auto service centers on commercially zoned property. Per IPCB, as discussed below, the land class of each property is also identified below in parentheses. Class A land is more noise sensitive than Class B land. 83"' U Figure 2: Zoning and IPCB Land Classes Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 . (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 419 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 August 21, 2026 Page 5 of 35 The Village of Mt. Prospect has sound level limits for industrial facilities and wind turbines but has no fixed levels for other types of facilities. In the unspecified cases for sites in Illinois, the default directive is the Illinois Pollution Control Board noise regulation, Sections 901.102 and 901.103. This is an octave band -based regulation that can be more difficult to meet since each of the nine octave band sound levels must be in compliance. The compliance levels depend on the property's land class. For this location, the applicable criteria are based on levels emitted from Land Class B to Class A and Class B properties. We evaluate the predicted car wash sound levels outright against the IPCB octave band limits for this project. We also simulated compliance measurements after the facility is operating by combining the predicted car wash and ambient levels to determine compliance with the IPCB in the presence of ambient noise. This is the only way to assess compliance in the presence of ambient noise per the regulation. Title 35: Environmental Protection Subtitle H: Noise Chapter I: Pollution Control Board Section 901®12, Sound b it,te to Class A, Land a) Except as elsewhere provided i this Part, person, mush of cause or allow t c ernission of sound during daytime hourss from any ropelie noise source locatedo any Class Al B or C land to any rcceiving Class, A laid that exceeds any allowablc octave,, band soup pressure level spcc� le in the followingtable, w . e measured at, any point within, the receiving, Class A, la nd. Sound pressure levels must be measured at ],east 25 feat from the property -line noise source. Octave Band Center Allo,wable Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels 0of Frequency e Sound Enlitted, to, any Recelving Class A Lan, d ffoni Class C Land Class, B Land,, Class A Land 31.5 75 72 72 3 74 71 71,. 125 69 65 6 250 64 57 517' 500 58, 51 51 1000 52, 45 4 2000 47 39 39 4000 3 34 34 8000 40 32 32 Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 420 of 455 El Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 Slectiott 901,.'103 Slotiltild Emitted to I A's "B 111 a,, It'l d August 21, 2026 Page 6 of 35 IC r in 11110, ca"LIS le enlISS1,0311 of s,,ottii,dA`roi, E]EX,cept -as prOv-, led els a, pe, sciii, 't1st i, It or al w t 1, t.111, it 1311C 31111101 11 SIC sotllrcc I ]Ajl� 1 s la,'Ind th Y 1.?FOPC­ty­1 o'n la"Iny ClassIA,B,or C la,'Ind lt�oaiiy' "rec I'll g Cla,s B 11 st,tred eds yto b lcc(:vc a,,,ttn nd si,od,presstire 1,evel, sjiecificin, the d ,f,,cy�l,,',I�cyw']'n,,gt, la xczebic, 11011 Mea, Uasi,s ,B laill"Id. Soo,il d' . .. ... 1AL1,1S1I'L11r'ed_a,,t lea,st-25 fiaet a1 aillyp'(11,311t w1,1],1",'i`,n I recei'ving, 'I'll rc,sist,tre" levels ii_u,st bpe,iiwa fimmfl,ie 1,3roperty,41ille" 31101SIC sotfrccl. kItYLaAre Ba,,nd Ceillite"r tave'Baiid, Sottnd, Pressttref AI'lowable Oc e Lvels (AR o F're,( 1,aency (I lertz" E, 11 1", , Scyttnd, ' milu 'ed lu") i irig C v ail y' ecc'_­`,1 L i, 'ro ],asis B la�il di f , m. Class, C Laill"d Class, B La:nd, Cla,ss A, Laiiiidi 31.5 810 79, 72 63 17119 78 7 1, 125 17114 72 65 2,50 69 64, 57 500 63 58 5 1 Jig 52 45 2,000 52, 4,15, 39 ,4000 48, 4,, 1 34,, 8000 45 39 32 c "N '(S"OttrCel., Amende a:t 421"11, Reg.204,53, le, -tI vrc " ovembe,'r 1,201.8) Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan - Illinois Indiana - Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 - (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 421 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 7 of 35 5. Ambient Measurements 5.1 Ambient Measurements at Mount Prospect Site On Tuesday, June 2, 2026, between 8:20 AM and 10:00 AM, the ambient equivalent sound level (L,q) was measured for 15 minutes at each of five locations as indicated in Figure 3. Table 1 provides the octave band data for the measurements at each location. These measured levels were used to calibrate the traffic noise in the model in order to predict the ambient levels at the receptor locations. Figure 3: Ambient Measurement Locations and Recorded Sound Levels Table 1: Measured Ambient Sound Levels Location Sound Pressure Level Leq, (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz) Overall dBA 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 SLM-000 74 71 67 65 63 65 61 60 61 69 SLM-001 75 76 72 68 65 63 60 55 58 68 SLM-002 70 72 69 65 64 67 62 52 43 70 SLM-003 66 65 60 57 54 54 50 43 33 58 SLM-004 67 70 63 61 61 59 54 47 39 63 Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 . (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 422 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 8 of 35 Figure 4 shows the sound level meter at measurement location SLM-001. The other locations were measured in the same manner with the meter mounted to a tripod. Figure 4: Measurement Setup at Location SLM-001, Along Main Street, Looking South 6. Sound Propagation Modelinp, We modeled the Mt. Prospect site and surrounding area in SoundPLAN, which is a three-dimensional computer program commonly used by acoustics consultants. Site topography, existing and proposed buildings, and traffic sound sources based on site measurements as described in the previous section, and receptor locations were input as elements into the computer model. 6.1 Predicted Ambient Sound Levels The ambient sound levels were measured on the future site as described in the previous section to calibrate the traffic noise model and predict the sound levels at all receptor locations from traffic noise. All locations had at least two octave bands that exceed the regulation, and one location is predicted to exceed in eight octave bands. While traffic noise is exempt from the regulation limits, these levels illustrate the potential for the ambient to interfere with the car wash compliance measurements. The predicted receptor spectra are listed in Table 2. Levels in bold red text with a shaded backgroi for residential receptors and bold orangei for commercial receptors exceed the IPBC criteria. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 423 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 August 21, 2026 Page 9 of 35 The predicted A -weighted sound levels at the receptor locations (yellow dots with associated number) are shown in Figure 5. Although the IPCB does not have overall level requirements, it is convenient to use the single number value for cross reference with the rightmost column in Table 2. Figure 6 shows the sound propagation map for the traffic noise. Receptor locations near the buildings on the applicant's property were used for model calibration and are not included in Table 2 because they are not relevant to the regulation. Table 2: Predicted Ambient Spectra at Receptor Locations with Project Buildings in Place — Based on Ambient Traffic Noise Measurements Receptor Number Receptor Property IPCB Class Sound Pressure Level Leq (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz)* Overall dBA (for ref.) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 IPCB Criteria — Class A 72 71 65 57 51 45 39 34 32 N/A 1 A 69 70 68 64 62 66 60 49 37 68 2 A 64 65 62 57 55 57 50 39 24 60 3 A 70 72 68 64 63 66 61 51 39 69 4 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 51 39 69 5 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 50 39 69 6 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 50 39 69 7 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 50 39 69 8 A 70 71 68 65 63 66 61 50 39 69 9 A 64 66 63 59 57 60 54 42 28 63 10 A 62 63 60 56 54 56 49 37 20 59 11 A 63 64 61 57 55 58 52 39 23 61 IPCB Criteria — Class B 79 78 72 64 58 52 46 41 39 N/A 12 B 70 72 69 65 63 67 62 51 39 69 13 B 70 71 69 65 63 66 61 50 38 69 14 B 68 69 67 63 61 64 59 47 35 67 15 B 63 64 61 57 55 58 51 37 20 60 16 B 64 65 62 58 56 59 52 39 22 61 17 B 64 65 63 59 57 60 54 41 25 62 18 B 68 69 66 63 61 65 59 48 37 67 19 B 67 69 66 62 61 64 58 47 35 66 20 B 70 71 68 65 63 66 61 50 38 69 * Levels in bold red text with gray shading exceed the IPBC criteria for Class A properties and levels in bold orange text with grqy shading exceed the criteria for Class B properties. Should compliance measurements be made after the project is built and in operation, Appendix B provides some information from the IPCB on accounting for ambient levels that interfere with the subject matter measurements. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 424 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 10 of 35 Figure 5: Single Point Map (dBA) — Ambient Model for Traffic Noise with Project Buildings in Place Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 425 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 August 21, 2026 Page 11 of 35 Figure 6: Contour Map (dBA) — Ambient Model for Traffic Noise with Project Buildings in Place Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 426 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 12 of 35 6.2 Proposed Project 6.2.1 Predicted Sound Levels for Proposed Project We modeled the Mt. Prospect site and surrounding area in SoundPLAN with sound sources based on measurements at the Brighton and Madison Heights locations. See Appendix C for input levels. We have modeled the worst -case scenario with the car wash entry and exit doors open, the vacuum building doors open, and six outdoor vacuuming stations in use (half of total). A three-dimensional view of the propagation model is shown in Figure 7. In the image: • The red -shaded areas on the side of the buildings represent open doors at the entrance and exit of both the car wash and vacuum buildings. • The red asterisks are vacuum nozzles and vacuum pump sound sources. • The bright red lines are the road traffic sources. • The yellow dots are receptor locations, which were selected to cover the nearby residential and commercial properties. • The cyan areas are screen walls. • The gray blocks are buildings. The notch at the building entries and exits shape the radiation pattern to match the measurements of operations made at the Brighton and Madison Heights sites. Due to the close proximity of the nearest residential properties west of the car wash tunnel exit, the three planned screen walls shown on the site development plan are necessary. The wall along the south property line was modeled with a height of 8 feet, and the walls at the west side of the car wash tunnel exit and entrance are both 12 feet tall to match the building height. The screen walls surrounding the outdoor vacuum pump were also modeled with a height of 8 feet. The indoor vacuum pump exhaust pipe opening is at 10 feet. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 . (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 427 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 Figure 7: SoundPLAN Three-dimensional Model View August 21, 2026 Page 13 of 35 Because of the close proximity to the residences, we used the Stealth Predator Ultra -Quiet Drying System data in place of the standard dryers at your direction. The product brochure is provided in Appendix D. Note that the manufacturer, International Drying Corporation, has been recently purchased by National Carwash Solutions, and this product will be rebranded. We understand that the product itself is not changing, but this should be verified with the new owner. The Stealth dryers were initially modeled using levels for an 80 HP system, which is approximately 16 decibels quieter than the standard dryers. Note that the manufacturer did not provide a sound spectrum, so we used the spectral shape of the standard blowers and adjusted it to match the manufacturer's overall level. Figure 8 shows the nearest Class A (residential) and Class B (commercial) property line receptor locations used for our predictions, which are identified by numbered yellow circles. The number in the white box associated with each is the predicted overall dBA sound level. Despite the overall level not being relevant to the IPCB regulation, it is part of the computer output and allows for asingle-number cross-referencing of the data in Table 3. The receptor locations on the El Car Wash site near the project buildings were used to calibrate the model and are not relevant to assessing compliance with the noise ordinance. Figure 9 shows the A -weighted predicted sound propagation map for the area surrounding the car wash. Again, these are overall levels, but more importantly on this image, the sound propagation pattern is shown, which can provide insight on mitigation strategies. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 428 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 August 21, 2026 Page 14 of 35 The predicted spectra at the receptor locations due only to the car wash sound sources (car wash dryers and vacuum building with no ambient noise added) are provided in Table 3. Levels in bold red text with a shaded background for Class A (residential) receptors and bold orange text with a shaded background for Class B (commercial) receptors exceed the IPBC criteria outright without the addition of the ambient noise. Again, the overall dBA does not apply for compliance assessment but is a convenient reference for the labeling in Figure 8. Table 3: Predicted Spectra at Receptor Locations — With All Car Wash Tunnel and Vacuum Building Doors Open, 80 HP Stealth Dryers, and Four Screen Walls Receptor Number Receptor Property IPCB Class Sound Pressure Level Leq (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz) Overall dBA (for ref.) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 IPCB Criteria — Class A 72 71 65 57 51 45 39 34 32 N/A 1 A 43 47 40 40 36 34 32 22 5 39 2 A 38 42 36 33 32 31 29 20 4 35 3 A 43 49 44 42 41 40 41 35 22 46 4 A 43 51 45 44 43 40 38 31 23 45 5 A 45 54 49 48 47 45 44 37 27 50 6 A 46 55 51 51 50 50 50 43 30 55 7 A 44 54 49 48 48 47 44 34 20 51 8 A 39 48 43 42 41 39 36 26 8 43 9 A 39 47 43 42 41 37 36 28 13 43 10 A 40 50 47 45 45 43 41 33 17 48 11 A 37 44 41 39 38 36 35 26 6 41 IPCB Criteria — Class B 79 78 72 64 58 52 46 41 39 N/A 12 B 46 50 44 43 41 40 39 31 15 45 13 B 46 50 43 41 38 36 34 27 15 41 14 B 48 58 54 53 53 50 47 38 28 55 15 B 47 58 54 53 53 51 49 43 35 56 16 B 47 57 55 54 54 53 53 47 40 58 17 B 46 55 52 51 51 50 50 44 36 56 18 B 36 43 41 39 38 36 37 28 11 42 19 B 42 49 46 44 44 41 41 35 24 47 20 B 50 56 51 52 49 48 47 40 26 53 * Levels in bold red text with red shading exceed the IPBC criteria for Class A properties and levels in bold orange tot with oratige shading exceed the criteria for Class B properties. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 429 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 15 of 35 Figure 8: Single Point Map (dBA) — Car Wash Sound Levels with Entrance and Exit Doors Open, 80 HP Stealth Dryers, and Three Screen Walls Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 430 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 16 of 35 Figure 9: Sound Contour Map (dBA) — Car Wash Sound Levels with Entrance and Exit Doors Open, 80 HP Stealth Dryers, and Three Screen Walls Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 431 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 17 of 35 6.2.2 Evaluation of Compliance for Proposed Project To evaluate IPCB compliance in areas with high ambient levels, we must simulate a measurement of the car wash in operation. A series of calculations then allow for the result to be compared to the IPCB. These steps are briefly described in the following list. An example calculation for Receptor Number 15 is provided in Appendix B, Table 9. 1. Add the predicted ambient level and the predicted car wash facility level at each receptor location to produce the total sound level from all sound sources at that location. Note that this addition is done on a logarithmic basis, and general rules for this process are found in Appendix A. 2. Subtract the ambient level from the total level. This calculation is done on a linear basis, which is simple subtraction. 3. Determine the correction factors from Table 1 in Section 910.106(a)(4) for the differences calculated in Step 2. 4. Linearly subtract the correction factors from the total sound level. 5. Compare the corrected levels to the IPCB regulation. Exceedances indicate that mitigation is required to meet the IPCB regulation. 6. This is repeated for all locations in all octave bands. The total sound level from both the predicted car wash levels and the predicted ambient level for each location is shown in Table 4. The numbers in bold red text with a shaded background indicate octave band sound levels that exceed the IPCB criteria for sound emitted to Class A properties and numbers i bold oranget with a shaded background indicate levels that exceed the IPCB criteria for sound emitted to Class B properties. The calculation steps above were applied to these data, resulting in Table 5. The locations that have numbers greater than zero indicate that the project will require mitigation to bring them into compliance. For the ambient corrected sound levels in Table 5, all residential locations meet the IPCB regulation with the 80 HP Stealth dryers and the three screen walls based on the measured ambient level. Three commercial locations do not meet the regulation. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 432 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 Table 4: Total Predicted Spectra at Receptor Locations — Ambient plus Project Sound (80 HP Stealth Dryers and Four Screen Walls) August 21, 2026 Page 18 of 35 Receptor Number Receptor Property IPCB Class Sound Pressure Level Leq, (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 IPCB Criteria - Class A 72 71 65 57 51 45 39 34 32 1 A 69 70 68 64 62 66 60 49 37 2 A 64 65 62 57 55 57 50 39 24 3 A 70 72 68 64 63 66 61 51 39 4 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 51 39 5 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 50 39 6 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 51 39 7 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 50 39 8 A 70 71 68 65 63 66 61 50 39 9 A 64 66 63 59 57 60 54 42 29 10 A 62 63 60 56 55 56 50 38 22 11 A 63 64 61 57 55 58 52 39 23 IPCB Criteria — Class B 79 78 72 64 58 52 46 41 39 12 B 70 72 69 65 63 67 62 51 39 13 B 70 71 69 65 63 66 61- 50 38 14 B 68 70 67 63 62 64 59 48 36 15 B 63 65 62 58 57 58 53 44 35 16 B 64 65 63 59 58 60 55 47 40 17 B 64 66 63 59 58 60 55 46 37 18 B 68 69 66 63 61 65 59 48 37 19 B 67 69 66 62 61 64 58 47 35 20 B 70 71 68 65 63 66 61- 50 38 * Levels in bold red text with red shading exceed the IPBC criteria for Class A properties and levels in bold orange text with orange shading exceed the criteria for Class B properties. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 433 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 19 of 35 Table 5: Corrected Project Spectra per IPCB to Determine IPCB Compliance — Ambient plus Project Sound (80 HP Stealth Dryers and Four Screen Walls) Receptor Number Receptor Property IPCB Class Sound Pressure Level Leq, (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 IPCB Criteria - Class A 72 71 65 57 51 45 39 34 32 1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IPCB Criteria — Class B 79 78 72 64 58 52 46 41 39 12 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 35 16 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 47 40 17 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 37 18 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Levels in bold red text with red shading exceed the IPBC criteria for Class A properties and levels in bold orange text with orange shading exceed the criteria for Class B properties. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 434 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 6.3 Proposed Project Additional Mitigation 6.3.1 Predicted Sound Levels for Proposed Project— Added Mitigation Package This list is a reminder of the mitigation included in the base project: • 80 HP Stealth Predator Ultra -Quiet drying system • 8-ft tall wall at the south property line as shown on drawings for 128 feet • 12-ft tall wall at the car wash tunnel exit • 12-ft tall wall at the car wash tunnel entrance • 8-ft screen wall surrounding the east outdoor vacuum pump August 21, 2026 Page 20 of 35 • North vacuum pump located on north side of vacuum building within a full enclosure and exhaust stack above roof To reduce levels at the commercial locations to the south, additional mitigation measures were incorporated into the model, which include the following: • Lengthen the 8-ft tall wall at the south property line eastward to a total of 200 feet long Because of poor sightlines, we also examined whether using 30 HP Stealth Predator Ultra Quiet dryers would allow the tunnel exit barrier to be shortened as well as the vacuum building barrier. With these 30 HP dryers, the 12-ft tall screen wall at the tunnel entrance is not required and the 12-ft screen wall at the tunnel exit can be shortened northward by 10 feet, resulting in a barrier that is now 20 feet long. The end of the barrier must be installed as close to the building corner as possible or overlap the building to the west to produce as small a gap as possible between the barrier and the building. Additionally, the previously recommended absorptive acoustical panels can be eliminated if the 30 HP blowers are used. With the above incorporated at the site, the predicted spectra meet the IPCB regulation at all locations. The receptor levels are provided in Table 6. An annotated site map with the mitigation notes is shown in Figure 10. Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the predicted sound level and propagation maps that correspond to the mitigated project. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 . (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 435 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 August 21, 2026 Page 21 of 35 w Ell ...a rDy$��'iLMl!iWr� Ili v'gMM'Wm� f � � W r � � u r w . Ell �r . ism �y ry Fr � UJIw M . Y I Illlllllllllllllllppllllluuum IIIIIII ,I IIII IIII V pp i "PO � w k"44fIN, Id Mimi r �ry w mmm. �y yy �p �r L i �d "%6 YYII "� uW qe i It wM1� ' � I10 � � • ✓� Otlo/�4 �Nu, oT , r d' f M �'" �'Ma. " NSA v M�JN Hy �I �,.., , .... �� � y... � W ,reu^� �rrf��. . � ,J �w ,� ,sl � � rid' oww ,.�,� r.,�Ww,a�- �I �ww �„'I'� '�l � mu ,� ✓rt„� �;,�,mr�am u VH„ 000�� l 0, u�rr mAlf 77 r sae u e „mraam q P ceulift m �ma mwir�mol5 A s »W,r w rwM �Nv, .0 a r .. „ , ,,,,,, „, ,,, , ,,,,,, „ , ,,,, " " All - < r� , P Vtl d bW rm ul N CAI ^XW G% v G lk M `e, v �2k o � m Figure 10: Annotated Project Site Map with Recommended Mitigation Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 436 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 22 of 35 Table 6: Predicted Car Wash Spectra at Receptor Locations with Added Mitigation Package - (Add 30HP Dryers and Extend Property Line Barrier Wall) Receptor Number Receptor Property IPCB Class Sound Pressure Level Leq (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz) Overall dBA (for ref.) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 IPCB Criteria — Class A 72 71 65 57 51 45 39 34 32 N/A 1 A 42 47 41 43 39 39 37 29 13 44 2 A 35 38 33 30 28 26 24 16 1 31 3 A 40 46 42 40 39 38 40 34 22 44 4 A 40 46 42 40 38 36 35 30 23 42 5 A 41 51 47 46 45 45 45 39 29 50 6 A 41 51 47 46 46 45 45 38 27 50 7 A 39 50 45 43 43 42 39 31 18 46 8 A 36 45 41 40 39 37 34 25 9 42 9 A 36 44 40 39 37 33 32 24 9 39 10 A 37 46 44 42 42 39 37 29 14 44 11 A 36 41 40 36 35 32 34 26 6 39 IPCB Criteria — Class B 79 78 72 64 58 52 46 41 39 N/A 12 B 45 50 44 45 41 41 41 34 18 46 13 B 42 46 42 40 40 39 40 32 18 45 14 B 44 54 50 49 49 46 43 35 27 51 15 B 43 54 51 49 48 46 44 39 33 51 16 B 44 52 50 47 46 42 41 34 25 48 17 B 44 50 49 46 44 42 46 40 33 50 18 B 35 41 40 38 37 34 35 27 11 40 19 B 41 47 45 43 42 39 41 35 24 46 20 B 45 50 47 47 44 42 43 36 25 48 * Levels in bold red text with red shading exceed the IPBC criteria for Class A properties and levels in bold orange text with orange shading exceed the criteria for Class B properties. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 437 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 23 of 35 Figure It: Single Point Map (dBA) — Car Wash Sound Levels with Added Mitigation Package, 30 HP Stealth Dryers and Two Screen Walls Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 438 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 24 of 35 Figure 12: Sound Contour Map (dBA) — Car Wash Sound Levels with Added Mitigation Package, 30 HP Stealth Dryers and Two Screen Walls Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 439 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 25 of 35 6.3.2 Evaluation of Compliance for Proposed Project with Added Mitigation Package The sum of the predicted ambient and project sound levels with the project base mitigation and the Added Mitigation at each octave band at the receptor locations are provided in Table 7 and the corrected spectra are provided in Table 8. Assessing the mitigated car wash sound levels against the corresponding IPCB criteria, the predicted levels will meet the IPCB requirements at all locations. Table 7: Total Predicted Spectra at Receptor Locations — Ambient plus Project Sound (Base + Added Mitigation Package) Receptor Number Receptor Property IPCB Class Sound Pressure Level Leq (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 IPCB Criteria - Class A 72 71 65 57 51 45 39 34 32 1 A 69 70 68 64 62 66 60 49 37 2 A 64 65 62 57 55 57 50 39 24 3 A 70 72 68 64 63 66 61 51 39 4 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 51 39 5 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 50 39 6 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 50 39 7 A 70 71 68 64 63 66 61 50 39 8 A 70 71 68 65 63 66 61 50 39 9 A 64 65 63 59 57 60 54 42 28 10 A 62 63 60 56 54 56 49 38 21 11 A 63 64 61 57 55 58 52 39 23 IPCB Criteria — Class B 79 78 72 64 58 52 46 41 39 12 B 70 72 69 65 63 67 62 51 39 13 B 70 71 69 65 63 66 61 50 38 14 B 68 69 67 63 61 64 59 48 36 15 B 63 64 61 57 55 57 50 40 33 16 B 63 64 61 57 55 57 50 38 26 17 B 64 66 63 59 57 60 54 44 34 18 B 68 69 66 63 61 65 59 48 37 19 B 67 69 66 62 61 64 58 47 35 20 B 70 71 68 65 63 66 61 50 38 * Levels in bold red text with red shading exceed the IPBC criteria for Class A properties and levels in bold orange text withorange shaditkq exceed the criteria for Class B properties. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 440 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 26 of 35 Table 8: Corrected Project Spectra per IPCB to Determine IPCB Compliance — Ambient plus Project Sound with Added Mitigation Package Receptor Number Receptor Property IPCB Class Sound Pressure Level Leq, (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 IPCB Criteria - Class A 72 71 65 57 51 45 39 34 32 1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IPCB Criteria — Class B 79 78 72 64 58 52 46 41 39 12 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 33 16 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 17 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 33 18 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Levels in bold red text with red shading exceed the IPBC criteria for Class A properties and levels in bold orange text with orange shading exceed the criteria for Class B properties. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 441 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 27 of 35 7. Final Note Soundscape Engineering's recommendations pertain only to the acoustical performance aspects of this project. Any impact those recommendations may have on other aspects of the project design and disciplines, such as fire suppression and fire ratings, MEP and ventilation requirements, structural loadings, egress requirements, etc., must be assessed by the appropriate design team members. This concludes our assessment and recommendations. We are happy to elaborate on anything contained within this report. Sincerely, Soundscape Engineering Per: lot Mandy Kachur, PE, INCE.Bd.Cert. Principal mkachur(cr�SoundscaneEneineerinii. com (734) 494-0322 cc: Evan Gerdes (Alrig) Appendix A: Acoustical Terminology Appendix B: Operations Compliance Appendix C: Equipment Sound Measurements at Reference Sites Appendix D: Stealth Predator "Ultra Quiet" Drying System Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 442 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 28 of 35 Appendix A: Acoustical Terminology Sound level is measured in units called decibels (abbreviated dB). Decibels are logarithmic rather than linear quantities and thus a doubling of the sound level does not translate to a mathematical doubling of decibels. Also, our ears do not interpret a doubling of sound energy (two sources instead of one) as a doubling of loudness. The logarithmic nature of dB and our subjective perception of relative sound levels result in the following approximate rules for judging increases in sound. • 1 dB sound level increase or decrease — not detectable • 3 dB sound level increase or decrease -just noticeable (the addition of one identical sound source to an existing source) • 5 dB sound level increase or decrease -clearly perceptible and is often considered significant (the addition of two identical sound sources to an existing source) • 10 dB sound level increase or decrease - perceived as twice as loud/half as loud (the addition of nine identical sound sources to an existing source) These perceived changes in the sound level are mostly independent of the absolute sound level. That is, a 35 dB sound will be perceived as approximately twice as loud as a 25 dB sound, and a 60 dB sound will be perceived as approximately twice as loud as a 50 dB sound. Audible sound occurs over a wide frequency range, from low pitched sounds at approximately 20 hertz (abbreviated as Hz) to high pitched sounds at 20,000 Hz. These frequencies are commonly grouped into octave bands or 1/3 octave bands. Building mechanical systems generally produce sound in the 63 Hz to 1000 Hz octave bands, with the lower frequency sound generated by large fans. Speech is predominantly contained in the 250 Hz to 2000 Hz octave bands. Unweighted or Z-weighted sound level — This level is directly what the microphone records without any adjustment. Spectral levels are generally reported as unweighted levels. In dosimetry work, it is used for evaluating the peak sound level, Lpk, exposure. A -weighted sound level - Humans do not hear equally well at all frequencies. We are especially poor at hearing low frequency sound and are best at hearing sound in the frequency range of speech. A microphone does not have these same characteristics. Therefore, when sound is being measured to determine how well people will be able to hear it, a "weighting" or microphone -to -human correction factor is applied to the sound level measured using a microphone. The most common weighting is the "A - weighting", and the resulting sound level is expressed in A -weighted decibels (dBA). This weighting reduces the low frequency energy contribution to the overall sound level, slightly increases the contribution at the dominant frequencies of speech, and slightly reduces the contribution at high frequencies. Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) is essentially the average sound level in an environment. However, the Leq is a logarithmic average over a period of time and not a simple arithmetic average which means that louder sounds have more influence on the level. Leq can be measured for any time period. It is typically measured for the time increments of 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 1 hour, or 24 hours. Steady sounds, such as fan or pump noise, can be accurately measured for much shorter periods of time, such as 30 to 60 seconds if the equipment is the dominant sound. An A -weighted equivalent sound level is sometimes designated as LAeq though the unit dBA after the decibel level also indicates an A -weighted level. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 443 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 29 of 35 Decibel addition is not on an arithmetic basis but on a logarithmic basis. This means that the level produced from two sound sources of 60 dBA is 63 dBA and not 120 dBA. While acoustics consultants use this mathematical formula for this calculation, the table below provides a shorthand method of estimation. Only two numbers can be added at a time using this method. For three or more numbers, the process below must be repeated multiple times. When two dB values differ by... ... add the following dB to the higher value. 0 or 1 3 2 or 3 2 4 to 9 1 10 or more 0 Examples: 43 dB + 44 dB = 47 dB (difference between numbers is 1, so add 3 to the highest value) 43 dB + 48 dB = 49 dB (difference between numbers is 5, so add 1 to the highest value) 43 dB + 53 dB = 53 dB (difference between numbers is 10 dB, so add 0 to the highest value) Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 444 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 30 of 35 Appendix B: Operations Compliance To determine compliance with the IPCB, the ambient sound level must be considered since it could interfere with an accurate measurement. Provisions for subtraction of the ambient from the measurement are provided in Section 910.106(a)(4) of the IPCB. Section 910.106 (a) 4) Correction for Long -Term Background Ambient Sound A) Tl e raw 1-hour L most be corrected) for long-term background ,. ambient sound. Subsection (b) describes methods to obtain the long-term background ambient sound level in the j� frequency band.. The correction is dependent on. the difference (in decibels) between the raw, 1-hour,, j"', band property -lire noise source (LC ) and correspond.iu g j1; ,Viand long-term'background ac:l ground ambient sound, level, The correction to he applied is as follows: 1f the difference between the raw 1 -hour L and the long- term background ambient sound is larger than 10 decibels, then the correction is set to , ii) Ifthe difference between the raw 1-hour L,,qand the long- term background ambient sound difference is less than 3 decibels, theca thejt' frequency -band level, LeqN,, is set to 0. iii) If the dit `erence between the raw 1-hour L q and the long- te background grornd ambient sound is between. 3 and 10 decibels, then the correction given in Table 1 is subtracted from the raw, l-hour property -lone noise source L (1j, Table 1 Corrections in d13 for long-term background groun.d ambient sound Difference Correctiot (d13) (dB) 3, 3 4 2.3 5 1. 6 1. 1..0 8 0.' 19 0.6 10 0.5 1) The long to hacl .grou nd ambient corrected level is the property line noise source L reported for the jth frequency band. This correction factor is applied if the measured sound level during operations is within ten decibels of the measured ambient. This is because a microphone cannot separate the ambient level from the sound of interest, in this case the car wash, and both are simultaneously recorded and are additive. When the ambient level comes within ten decibels of the car wash sound, the ambient level will increase the measurement, giving a false reading of the car wash sound level. If the ambient level is louder, then it will dominate the measurement. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 445 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 31 of 35 The full calculation for evaluating compliance is presented in Table 9 for Receptor Number 15, with the unmitigated project in operation. This calculation and comparison to the IPCB regulation is repeated for all receptor locations. As shown in the example, the project does not comply at this location in the 4000 Hz octave band. This is indicated by the positive exceedance values at some octave bands. Mitigation will lower the project sound level and should be selected such that no octave bands exceed the IPCB criteria. Table 9: Example Calculation for Evaluation of Compliance at Receptor Number 15 for Base Mitigation Condition Sound Pressure Level Leq, (dB) at Octave Band Center Frequencies (Hz) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Step / Description Predicted Ambient Sound Level 63 64 60 56 54 56 49 35 17 Predicted Project Sound Level 47 58 54 53 53 51 49 43 35 Total Sound Level (Ambient + Project, 63 65 62 58 57 58 53 44 35 on logarithmic basis) Difference (Total Level — Predicted Ambient, 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 7 16 on linear basis) Correction Factors from IPCB Table 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Based on the Difference Corrected Sound Level (Total Sound Level — Correction Factor, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 35 on linear basis) IPCB Criteria — Class B 79 78 72 64 58 52 46 41 39 Exceedance of IPCB Criteria (Corrected Level — IPCB Criteria, on a - - - - - - - 1.6 - linear basis with the lowest value at 0) * Levels in bold orangee i orange shading exceed the IPBC criteria for Class B properties. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 446 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 Appendix C: Equipment Sound Measurements at Reference Sites August 21, 2026 Page 32 of 35 Sound levels were measured at existing El Car Wash locations in Brighton and Madison Heights in Michigan. These locations use the same blower system as originally proposed for the Mt. Prospect location. Measurements were taken 25 feet from the tunnel entrance and exit (doors both open and closed with blowers on) and at 1 meter from the vacuum nozzles. Results are shown in Table 10 and Table 11. The octave band sound levels are unweighted decibels (dB) and the rightmost column is the A -weighted overall level of all the bands (dBA). The car wash equipment levels were consistent between the two sites except for the 31.5 and 63 Hz levels at Madison Heights. We believe these levels were influenced by chiller noise coming from a building to the north because the elevated level was also present in the ambient measurement. For modeling, octave band sound levels are used because sound propagation and its interaction with objects are frequency dependent. The higher level of the two locations was used for calibration, to be conservative. Table 10: Car Wash Sound Levels in dB at Brighton and Madison Heights Octave Band Center Frequency, Hz Overall Condition (Location) dBA 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Exit, Blowers On, Doors 73 77 80 80 82 81 80 75 66 86 Open (Brighton) Exit, Blowers On, Doors 73 84 76 81 81 82 81 75 67 87 O en Madison Heights) Exit, Blowers On, Doors 70 75 77 76 75 72 70 63 53 77 Closed (Brighton) Exit, Blowers On, Doors 73 82 74 77 73 73 71 63 52 78 Closed (Madison Heights) Entrance, Doors Open 71 75 77 77 75 74 74 67 57 80 (Brighton) Entrance, Doors Open 77 84 75 79 76 75 75 68 58 80 (Madison Heights) Entrance, Doors Closed 69 72 71 68 62 60 58 50 37 66 (Brighton) Entrance, Doors Closed 75 80 67 69 62 61 59 52 40 67 Madison Heights) Note: These levels were measured at a point directly in front of the entrance or exit at a distance of 25 ft. Table 11: Vacuum Sound Levels in dB at Brighton and Madison Heights Condition (Location) Octave Band Center Frequency, Hz Overall dBA 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Nozzle Outside Sheath (Brighton) 63 66 63 56 58 59 63 64 68 70 Nozzle Outside Sheath Madison Heights) 69 71 66 66 60 65 74 70 67 77 Note: These levels were measured at a distance of 1 meter from the nozzle. Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 447 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 Figure 13: Brighton (left) and Madison Heights (Right) E1 Car Wash Exit Figure 14: Vacuum Area at Madison Heights Location Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com August 21, 2026 Page 33 of 35 Page 448 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report August 21, 2026 SE No. 2425.2 Page 34 of 35 Appendix D: International Drying Corp. - Stealth Predator "Ultra Quiet" Drying System INTERNATIONAL DRYING STEALTH PREDATOR DRYING SYSTEM Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan . Illinois Indiana . Virginia (734) 418-8663 . (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 . (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 449 of 455 E1 Car Wash Mt. Prospect — Sound Propagation Report SE No. 2425.2 5 dBA It Q= is 30 fee't h Th,,1e SteatIt III a''features Patient .� t- lam ; f t i '" m ITV ,. c li,, I il first lu , ��o Q , �" Dryer" I . and III' is the Mast powerful Ultra QuietI gII l 4 ; 3,132"' 100 3m# August 21, 2026 Page 35 of 35 [NTERNAirt C INI F"D CJU /:'N, T 11 113 ,4 PECIFICATIONS Soundscape Consulting LLC Michigan Illinois Indiana Virginia (734) 418-8663 - (312) 436-0032 (317) 489-4151 (703) 722-6633 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com Page 450 of 455 STONEFIELD July 9, 2026 Planning Division Village of Mount Prospect 50 S. Emerson St. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 RE: Stormwater Narrative Parcel IDS: 03-34-200-001-0000, 03-34-200-051-0000, 03-34-200-052-0000, 03-34-200-024-0000 1 E Rand Rd, Mount Prospect, Illinois, 60056 To whom it may concern: Stonefield Engineering and Design was retained to be the Civil Engineer for the proposed development located at the subject address & submit the following stormwater narrative for review. The existing site is occupied by a vacant 20,814-square-foot commercial building with associated parking lots and access drives. The site contains approximately 67,384 square feet of impervious surface within the property and adjacent right-of-way limits. The total tributary drainage area to the stormwater management system is 86,921 square feet (2.00 acres). Stormwater runoff from the existing roof and paved areas is collected by multiple catch basins and conveyed through an existing storm sewer system consisting of 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe to an underground detention facility located in the northwest portion of the site. The existing detention facility consists of eleven (1 1) 60-inch diameter pipes, each 40 feet in length. Detained runoff is discharged through the existing outlet structure into the existing 24-inch PVC storm sewer located within the IL Route 83 right-of-way west of the site and continues south. The proposed redevelopment includes demolition of the existing building and associated site improvements, followed by construction of an automatic car wash, attached interior vacuum structure, vacuum stalls, parking areas, access drives, and associated site improvements. The proposed development will contain approximately 30,959 square feet of impervious surface, resulting in a net reduction of approximately 36,425 square feet of impervious area compared to existing conditions. Stormwater runoff from the proposed development will be collected by a system of storm sewer inlets and piping and conveyed to a proposed underground detention facility located in the southern portion of the site. The proposed detention facility will provide temporary storage and discharge stormwater through a reinforced concrete outlet control structure designed to restrict post -development runoff to the allowable release rate. The controlled discharge will connect to the existing 24-inch PVC storm sewer within the IL Route 83 right-of-way, maintaining the discharge sewer. The proposed detention system has been designed in accordance with the requirements of the MWRD Watershed Management Ordinance for the Des Plaines Watershed. The total tributary drainage area to the proposed detention system is 86,921 square feet (2.00 acres). Based on the allowable release rate of 0.20 cubic feet per second per tributary acre, the maximum allowable release rate for the site is 0.40 cubic feet per second. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses were performed using Hydro CAD to evaluate post -development runoff conditions and required detention storage. The analyses determined a required detention storage volume of 39,065 cubic feet. The proposed underground detention system has been sized to provide the required detention storage while limiting the peak discharge to the allowable release rate of 0.40 cubic feet per second. The proposed underground detention system provides 39,241 cubic feet of storage, which exceeds the required detention storage volume of 39,065 cubic feet. Volume control is not required for the proposed redevelopment because the project reduces the site's total impervious area by more than 30 percent relative to existing conditions, in accordance with the MWRD Watershed Management Ordinance. Should your office have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Best Regards, August Eschedor Stonefield Engineering and Design, LLC stonefieldeng.com 555 S. Old Woodward Ave, Suite 12L, Birmingham, MI 48009 t. 248.247.1 1 15 Page 451 of 455 VILLAGE MANAGER MAYOR Paul Wm. Hoefert TRUSTEES Vincent J. Dante Elizabeth B. DiPrima Terri Gens William A. Grossi John J. Matuszak Colleen E. Saccotelli /■���� Michael J. Cassady Mount Prospect VILLAGE CLERK Karen Agoranos Phone: 847/962-6000 Fax: 847/962-6022 www. mou ntprospect. org Village of Mount Prospect 1 S. EmersonStreet,•unt Prospect, Illinois•11 • Se pte m be r 11, 2026 Vincenzo Finazzo Stonefield Engineering & Design 555 S. Old Woodward Avenue Birmingham, MI 48009 Via e-mail: vfinazzoC>stonefieldeng.com Re: PZ-13-26 (PZZ26-000012) /Conditional Use (Car Wash) / 1 E Rand Rd / Review Comments #4 (Final) Dear Mr. Finazzo, The Village of Mount Prospect has reviewed the third submittal for a conditional use for a car wash at 1 East Rand Rd (Subject Property), and below are the following review comments from applicable departments: Planning Division: Items 1-7 require revisions prior to the Village Board meeting. Please submit these revisions no Later than September 18, 2026: 1. Split -face CMU is not an acceptable material for the trash enclosure or the vacuum enclosure Located on the east side of the building. Both accessory structures shall be constructed of brick veneer to match the principal building's primary building material and color. 2. Soundscape Report: The revised soundscape report states that by using 30 HP Stealth Predator Ultra Quiet dryers (in lieu of 80 HP): a. The 12-ft tall screen wall at the tunnel entrance can be removed; b. The 12-ft tall screen wall at the tunnel exit can be shortened to 20 feet long; c. The 2-inch thick sound absorptive acoustical panels can be eliminated on the 12-ft tall tunnel exit on the east wall. 3. If the 12-foot-tall screen wall at the tunnel exit is intended to serve as the sound wall identified in the specification sheet, "Sound Wall Details.pdf," please add a note to the architectural site plan indicating this. The sound wall is currently identified on the civil site plan. Page 452 of 455 Village of Mount Prospect I Page 2 4. Is the 8-ft tall, 200-ft long wall along the south property line made from lightweight PVC panels such as the AIL Sound Wall provided in the spec sheet "Sound Wall Details .pdf"? Provide details/drawings of this wall in the architectural drawing set. 5. Sheet C-2: a. Remove the note" Proposed 12 Ft Sound Wall" at the tunnel entrance. b. Update the note "PROPOSED +/- 2 FT DECORATIVE KNEE WALL" along the east property line to "PROPOSED MIN. 4 FT TALL SCREEN WALL". 6. All landscape plantings must be located entirely on private property. Some shrubs are located directly on the east property line. 7. The base of the monument sign (page 4 of the sign package) shall have a masonry base (not CMU). 8. A materials sample board including the make/model of each material type shall be provided at the Village Board meeting. 9. Please review the modified recommended conditions of approval at the end of this letter. Public Works Department: Public Works has reviewed the plans and traffic study submitted for the El Carwash proposed at 1 E. Rand Road, and has no objections to the requested Conditional Use. The comments listed below need not be addressed prior to conditional use approval, they will have to be addressed prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 10. The plan now shows the driveways onto Main Street and Rand Road to be modified to restrict access to right-in/right-out. The driveway designs may have to be modified to accommodate sidewalks and shared -use paths, and will have to be approved by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDoT). 11. Permits will be required from IDoT for any work (including utility connections) within the Main Street, Kensington Road, or Rand Road rights of way, and from the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) for any sanitary service or stormwater management improvements. 12. PW has no objection to the Stormwater Narrative provided previously, but additional information will be required prior to issuing the Building Permit. This information includes, but is not limited to the following: a. Indicate the overland flow routing and emergency overflow location on the grading and/or stormwater management plan. b. Confirm that the proposed system (storm sewer, overland flow paths, and inlet grates) has sufficient capacity to convey the stormwater runoff from the 100-year storm into the detention storage chamber. c. Provide details of the detention chamber and outlet structure. Page 453 of 455 Village of Mount Prospect I Page 3 d. Identify areas of the site that drain to neighboring properties or public right of way instead of draining toward the detention storage chamber. Account for this unrestricted flow in the release rate calculations. Again, the comments listed above need not be addressed prior to Conditional Use approval, but will have to be addressed prior to signing the MWRD permit, or issuing the Building Permit. It must be understood that the comments listed above reflect issues noted during a review of the proposed concept. A thorough review of the site design and details will be performed as part of the Building Permit review process. Building Department: 13. No additional comments from previous reviews. Provide a full code analysis, use groups, architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing drawings compliant with adopted and referenced codes. Fire Department: Please advise the applicant that the following items must be included during the building permit process. 14. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 will be required for this project. Ensure fire sprinkler shop drawings, hydraulic calculations, and equipment cut sheets are submitted for review. Village of Mount Prospect Fire Prevention Code, 24.20 15. A fire alarm system will be required for this project. Ensure that the fire alarm shop drawings with point-to-point wiring diagrams, battery load calculations, and equipment cut sheets are submitted for review. 16. A fire sprinkler room will be required for this building. 17. An egress plan must be provided for the entire building. This plan must include occupant Loads, travel distances, egress widths, and common path of travel distances. An egress plan will be required when the building plans are submitted for review. Additional exits may be required. 18. Fire lanes will be required based on the site review. Additional marking of fire lanes will be required. 19. All egress doors are to use keyless locksets on the egress side. No flush bolts, dead or draw bolts, etc. will be allowed. Life Safety Code, 7.2.1.5.1 Page 454 of 455 Village of Mount Prospect I Page 4 Recommended Conditions of Approval: (Please note that additional conditions of approval may be added.) A. The following are required to mitigate the noise generated by the blowers at entrance and exit doors open and multiple vehicles using the outdoor vacuums: a. A 30 HP Stealth Predator Ultra Quiet drying system is required; b. Aneight-foot-tall (8'-0") sound wall at the south property line that is a minimum of 200 feet long; c. A twelve -foot -tall (12'-0") wall at the car wash tunnel exit; d. An eight -foot -tall (8'-0") screen wall surrounding the east outdoor vacuum pump; and e. The vacuum pump located on north side of vacuum building shall be fully enclosed and shall be equipped with an exhaust stacl< above the roof. B. Silencers/mufflers shall be placed on each of the vacuums. C. All exterior lighting shall be limited to white light only. D. Lighting shall not be permitted on the arched vacuum equipment. If any changes are requested, please make the changes as noted above and submit a point - by -point response letter and pdf files of the drawings. Please upload revisions into the portal. Feel free to contact Ann Choi at (847) 818-5314 / achoi@mountprospect.org if you have any questions. c: File Sincerely, Ann Choi Development Planner Village of Mount Prospect Page 455 of 455