HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/09/1996 SC MinutesDirector
Glen R. Andler
Deputy Director
Sean P. Dorsey
village Engineer
Jeffrey A. Wulbecker
Administrative Aide
Dawn L. Wucki
Solid Waste Coordinator
M. Lisa Angell
Water/Sewer Superintendent
Roderick O'Donovan
Streets/Buildings Superintendent
Paul Bures
Forestry/Grounds Superintendent
Sandra M, Clark
Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent
James E. Guenther
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-222S
Phone B47/B70-5640 Fax B47/253-S377 TOO S47/392-1235
MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
SAFETY COMMISSION
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M.
on Monday, December 9, 1996.
IL, ROLL CALL
Upon roll call, each Safety Commission Member introduced themselves to the audience.
Present upon roll call: Lee Beening
Chairman
Andy Mitchell
Commissioner
Chuck Bencic
Commissioner
Nancy Bobikewicz
Commissioner
(Joined the discussion after item VLD)
Joan Bjork
Commissioner
Paul Bures
Public Works
George Steiner
Police Department
Buz Livingston
Fire Department
Sean Won
Public Works, Engineering Division
Absent: Phyllis Moliere
Commissioner
Others in Attendance: See Attached List.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Chuck Bencic, moved to approve the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Safety Commission held on October 14, 1996. The
Minutes were approved by a vote of 7-0.
IV. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
No citizens came forth at this time to discuss any topics that were not on the current agenda.
1
Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink
V. OLD BUSINESS
A) 3-WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST at MARINA ST & COUNCIL TR
a) Response from the City of Des Plaines
This item was discussed at the October 1996 Safety Commission Meeting. The
item was deferred until a response was received from the City of Des Plaines
concerning a speed limit reduction,. on Marina Street within the City of Des
Plaines.
The Village Traffic Engineer sent a letter (attached) to the City of Des Plaines
requesting that the speed limit of Marina Street be reduced from 30 mph to
20/25 mph on October 17, 1996 as instructed by the Safety Commission.
The City of Des Plaines sent a response (attached) to the Village on November
25, 1996. According to this response, the City of Des Plaines states:
1. The posted speed limit of 30 mph is appropriate for Marina street.
Therefore, the City of Des Plaines believes the 30 mph speed limit is a
safe and reasonable speed limit.
2. To artificially lower the speed limit would only result in additional speed
limit violations rather than control vehicles to a reasonable speed.
b) Background Information from the October 1996 Safety Commission Meeting
Resident Observations„
1) Speeding at this intersection
2) High amount of cut through traffic
3) There are many little children living around this intersection.
2. Staff Observations:
The Engineering Staff performed a stop sign study. The findings are as
follows:
1) Special Condition/Speeding Problem.
As shown on the attached map, two legs of this 3-way
intersection is within the Village of Mount Prospect. The third
leg of the intersection is within the City of Des Plaines.
Currently, there is one stop sign on eastbound Council Trail at
Marina Street.
Due to resident's complaint about speeding on Marina Street,
the City of Des Plaines performed a speed and a volume study
between July 25 and July 26, 1996. The 85th percentile speeds
of Marina Street were 29.4 mph for the northbound traffic and
22.7 mph for the southbound traffic. Based on the speed and
volume, the City of Des Plaines decided not to lower the speed
limit (30 mph) of Marina Street. It is projected that the 85th
percentile speed for Council Trail is the same as that of Marina
Street, Therefore, random speeding does occur on Council
Trail. Note that the posted speed limit of Council Trail is 20
mph.
2)
Accidents
Mt. Prospect Side
Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
No. of 0 0 0 0 0
accident
Des Plaines Side
Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
No. of 1 2 1 1 1
accident
The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant
(minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi -Way Stop
Warrants.
3)
Traffic Volume
The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant
is 500 vehicles/hour for eight hour periods (500 x 8 = 4000
cars/8 hrs). The traffic volume at this intersection (759 cars/8
hrs) is approximately 19% of the stop sign warrant.
4)
Sight Obstruction
A number of parkway trees are located at the intersection.
However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction
problems.
5)
Survey Results
A total of 25 surveys were sent out in August, 1996 to collect
and analyze the residents' opinions. 20 surveys were returned
to the Village. 19 residents favored and 1 resident was against
the 3-way stop sign at Marina Street and Council Trail.
3
c) Discussion
Sean Won summarized the response from the City of Des Plaines as follows:
1,. The posted speed limit of 30 mph is appropriate for Marina street.
Therefore, the City of Des Plaines believes the 30 mph speed limit is a
safe and reasonable speed limit.
2 To artificially lower the speed limit would only result in additional speed
limit violations rather than control vehicles to a reasonable speed.
Mr. Peter Gilbertson of 621 South Albert St, Ms. Sara Yarbrough of 605 South
Albert St and Mr. & Mrs. Hajduk of 513 South Albert St said the following:
1.. This intersection does not meet the stop sign warrants and the City of
Des Plaines does not want to install a stop sign on Marina St at Council
Tr. The City of Des Plaines will not reduce the speed limit on Marina St
from 30 mph to 20/25 mph.
2. They asked all commissioners if the Village can do anything for them to
resolve the speeding and the cut through traffic problem if a stop sign
can not be installed on Marina St at Council Tr and the speed limit on
Marina St can not be reduced. Chairman Lee Beening said that
commissioners' hands are tied on this request.
3. Mrs. Hajduk asked to the Safety Commission why Marina St south of
Council Tr is not within the Village of Mount Prospect (Chairman
Beening said that he does not know why that Marina St is not within the
Village of Mount Prospect).
Chairman Lee Beening said that Marina St south of Council Tr is under the
jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines. Chairman Beening also stated that two
cars passed him when he was driving 20 mph on Council Tr and that what the
City of Des Plaines said could be right.
Chairman Lee Beening, seconded by Commissioner Andy Mitchell, moved to
approve the following recommendation:
Install LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY and CAUTION CHILDREN PLAY SIGNS near
the existing 20 mph speed limit sign on Council Tr for westbound traffic.
The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0.
VI, NEW BUSINESS
A) SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REQUEST from 30 mph to 25 mph on BUSSE
AVE between WE -GO TR and MAIN ST
a) Background Information
Resident & Staff Comments:
Due to speeding on Busse Ave, the Safety Commission instructed the Village
Traffic Engineer to investigate the possibility of reducing the speed limit of the
entire length of Busse Ave from 30 mph to 25 mph. Note: the speed limit of
Busse Ave between Weller Ln and We -Go Trail is 20 mph and the speed limit of
Busse Ave between Main Street and Mt. Prospect Rd is 25 mph. Therefore,, the
speed limit of Busse Ave between We -Go Trail and Main Street needs to be
reduced from 30 mph to 25 mph.
A speed survey of cars on Busse Ave was performed in September, 1996. The
85th percentile speed was between 30 - 33 mph which indicates the occurrence
of random speeding. A total of 60 surveys were sent out in October, 1996 to
collect and analyze the residents' opinions. 43 surveys were returned to the
Village. 39 residents favored and 4 residents were against the proposed speed
limit change. All residents on Busse Ave between We -Go Tr and Main St were
informed about the December Safety Commission Meeting schedule.
Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended:
Lower the speed limit on Busse Ave between We -Go Trail and Main Street
from: 30 mph
to: 25 mph
b) Discussion
Commissioner Andy Mitchell said that the Safety Commission already approved
the speed limit change on Busse Ave. Chairman Lee Beening explained that
this request was not previously discussed and that the Safety Commission
instructed the Village Traffic Engineer to process the speed limit reduction
because the survey needs to be done per the Notification Policy. Sean Won
said that the survey was done per the Notification Policy
Commissioner Chuck Bencic, seconded by Paul Bures, moved to approve the
change recommended by the Engineering Staff.
The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0.
9
B) REMOVAL of PARKING RESTRICTION/ONE-WAY STREET
DESIGNATION/TURN RESTRICTION on WELLER LN between BUSSE
AVE and CLEVEN AVE
a) Background Information
Resident & Staff Comments:
Weller Lane is no longer used by Westbrook School parents to pick up and drop
stiff students due to a change in the use of Westbrook School. All elementary,
school children have moved to the new Liens School. Presently Westbrook
School is used, as a special education school. Therefore, Parking
Restrictions/One-Way Street Designation/Turn Restriction on Weller Ln between
Busse Ave & Cleven Ave are not needed. The special education school that is
using Westbrook School has confirmed that they are not using Weller Lane for
pick-up and drop-off operations.
A total of 18 surveys were sent out in October, 1996 to collect and analyze the
residents' opinions. 10 surveys were returned to the Village. All 10 returned
surveys favored the proposed changes. All residents along Weller Ln between
Busse Ave and Cleven Ave were informed about the DecemberSafety
Commission Meeting schedule..
Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended the following:
Remove
1. One Way Street Designation Southbound between Busse Ave and
Cleven Ave during school hours
2. No -Right -Turn from Cleven Ave onto Weller Lane during school
hours
3. No Parking during school hours for the Eastside of Weller Ln
between Busse Ave and Cleven Ave
4. No Parking Pick -Up Zone for the Westside of Weller Ln between a
point 600 ft and 800 ft south of Central Rd
b) Discussion
Chairman Lee Beening said that Westbrook School is being used as a special
education school. Therefore, Parking Restrictions/One-Way Restriction/Turn
Restriction on Weller Ln between Busse Ave & Cleven Ave are not needed.
Chairman Beening asked Sean Woo whether the existing DO -NOT -ENTER sign
has been removed. Sean ''iihton said that the DO -NOT -ENTER sign will be
removed since Weller Ln will not be a ore -way street if the recommended'
change is approved.
0
Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Joan Bjork, moved to
approve the change recommended by the Engineering Staff.
The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0.
C) PARKING RESTRICTION on THE EASTSIDE of ELMHURST AVE
between POST OFFICE MAIL DROP BOX DRIVEWAYS
a) Background Information
1. Mount Prospect Post Office Observations:
No parking on the eastside of Elmhurst Avenue between Post Office
Mail Drop Box Driveways to provide an unobstructed view to the drivers.
2. Staff Observations:
This parking restriction affects only two businesses. One is the Mount
Prospect Post Office which requested the restriction. The other is
Friedrichs Funeral Home. A survey to Friedrichs Funeral Home was
sent out on November 8, 1996. No response was received.
No Parking on Elmhurst Avenue as requested by the Post Office will
improve the safety of drivers who are using the Mail Drop Box and
drivers on Elmhurst Ave. Only 3 parking spaces will be eliminated.
However cars can park north of the north post office driveway which is
also a hour parking zone.
Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended the following
change:
From 2 Hour Parking Limit
To No Parking Any Time
on the Eastside of Elmhurst Avenue from Central Road to 180 ft
north of Central Road
b) Discussion
Chairman Lee Beening said that two full-size vans were parked between the
Post Office Mail Drop Box Driveways when he checked a few days ago. These
two vans obstructed the view for drivers using the Post Office Mail Drop Box
Driveways.
Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Joan Bjork, moved to
approve the change recommended by the Engineering Staff.
The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0.
W
D) YIELD SIGN REQUEST on STRATFORD PL at MEADOW LN &
WEDGEWOOD LN
a) Background Information
1. Resident Observations:
Cars are making turns at these corners without slowing down.
2. Staff Observations:
The Engineering Staff sent out surveys per the Notification Policy to
residents within 250 ft within two intersections to collect their opinions
and notified all affected residents about the December Safety
Commission Meeting schedule. The Engineering Staff performed a
speed survey in August 1996. The 85th percentile speeds on Meadow
Ln and Wedgewood Ln were between 25 mph to 33 mph which indicates
the occurrence of random speeding. A total of 29 surveys were sent out
in October, 1996 to collect and analyze the residents' opinions. 18
surveys were returned to the Village. 14 residents favored and 4
residents were against the proposed changes.
The number of accidents at the intersections are as follows:
Meadow Ln & Stratford PI: No Accidents for the last 5 years
Wedgewood Ln & Stratford PI: One Accident in 1993 for the last 5
years
A significant factor to consider is that the pavement width of the street is
only 18' wide and the street does not have sidewalks. It is common for
pedestrians to walk on the edge of the roadway.
Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended:
Install Yield Signs on Stratford Place at Meadow Ln & on Stratford
Place at Wedgewood Ln
b) Discussion
Chairman Lee Beening said the following:
1. Meadow Ln, Stratford PI and Wedgewood Ln do not have sidewalks.
2. The pavement width of three streets is narrow (only 18').
Commissioner Joan Bjork, seconded by Commissioner Andy Mitchell, moved to
approve the change requested by the Engineering Staff.
The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0.
Commissioner Nancy Bobikewicz joined the Safety Commission Meeting at this time.
E) VARIATION REQUEST to ALLOW BERM and SHRUBS on PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY (1425 BURNING BUSH LN)
a) Background Information
1. Resident Observations:
1) Mr. W. Richardson of 1425 Burning Bush Ln was not aware of
the shrub and berm restriction on public right-of-way (He was
aware of the 3 ft height restriction).
2) Neighbor has a berm on public right-of-way
3) He installed this berm and shrubs to prevent any damage to his
yard from cars, snow plows and'bicycles.
4) He already spent 1200 to install this berm and shrubs. If he
has to relocate, it would cost about the same amount. He feels
that he does not have a place on his property for this quantity of
top soil and shrubs.
2. Staff Observations:
This berm is located within Public Right -Of -Way contrary to the Village
Ordinance Section 9.302. The shrubs are located within Public Right -
Of -Way contrary to the. Village Ordinance Section 9.501. These two
ordinances were adopted on December 1, 1992. The berm was installed
sometime after November, 1994. The height of the shrubs is currently
approximately 3 ft above the pavement. The effect of this berm on
drainage is insignificant. This berm does not interfere with existing
public utilities maintenance.
b) Discussion
Chairman Lee Beening said the following:
1. The Village Ordinances 9.302 and 9.501 were adopted on December 1,
1992. The Village Ordinance 9.117 adopted the grandfather clause that
allows for certain existing plantings and berms to be retained on public
property per the procedure explained in the Ordinance 9.117. A
property owner that has existing plantings and berms on public property
can appeal to the Village Safety Commission per the Village Ordinance
9.117. But any new berms or evergreens or shrubs on public property
are not allowed after December 1, 1992.
2. Because new berms or shrubs are not allowed on public property, Mr.
W. Richardson of 1425 Burning Bush Lane & Public Works Department
are working on relocating the existing berm and shrubs on Mr.
Richardson's property. Therefore, this request is removed from the
agenda.
11
F) STOP SIGN RELOCATION REQUEST from WHEELING RD at
ELDERBERRY LN to WHEELING RD at THE 500 BLOCK DOGWOOD
LN
a) Background Information
1. Resident Observations:
1) It is difficult and dangerous to make a left turn out of the 500
block Dogwood Ln onto Wheeling Rd due to the volume and the
speed of traffic.
2) Witnessed several near collisions.
2. Staff Observations:
The Engineering Staff sent out surveys per the Notification Policy to
residents within 250 ft of these two intersections to collect their opinions
and notified all affected residents about the December Safety
Commission Meeting schedule. The Engineering Staff performed a stop
sign study and compared the two intersections for traffic volumes and
number of accidents. The findings are as follows:
1) Accidents
A search of the accident reports indicated:
Wheeling Rd & Elderberry Ln
Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
(up to Sep)
No. of accident 0 1 0 1 0
Wheeling Rd•& Dogwood Ln
Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 .
(up to Sep)
No. of accident 3 2 2 1 2
The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant
(minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi -Way Stop
Warrants at either intersection. But the total number of
accidents for the last five years at Wheeling Rd & Dogwood Ln
is 10 and five times the number of accidents (2 accidents for the
last five years) at Wheeling Rd and Elderberry Ln.
10
2) Traffic Volume
Traffic counts were performed in February, 1996. A comparison
of the average daily traffic volume is as follows:
Wheeling Rd: 7008 vpd (vehicle per day)
Dogwood Ln: 2357 vpd
Elderberry Ln: 187 vpd
The number of cars on Dogwood Ln is more than 12 times the
number of cars on Elderberry Ln.
The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant
is 500 vehicles/hour for eight hour periods (500 x 8 = 4000
cars/8 hrs). The traffic volume at Wheeling/Dogwood (2745
cars/8 hrs) is approximately 69% of the stop sign warrant. The
traffic volume at Wheeling/Elderberry (2159 cars/8 hrs) is
approximately 54% of the stop sign warrant. Both of the
intersection do not meet the stop sign warrant.
3) Sight Obstruction
A number of parkway trees are located at these intersections.
However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction
problems.
4) Survey Results
A total of 45 surveys were sent out in June, 1996 to collect and
analyze the resident's opinion. 15 surveys were returned to the
Village. 5 residents favored and 10 residents were against the
relocation .
The intersection of Wheeling Road and Dogwood Ln has more accidents
and more traffic than the intersection of Wheeling/Elderberry.
Additionally, residents on Elderberry Ln have other available routes to
access their residences. Residents on Boxwood Area do not have other
routes except Dogwood/Boxwood.
Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended:
Relocation of Stop Signs
from Wheeling Road at Elderberry Ln
to Wheeling Road at the 500 Block Dogwood Ln.
11
b) Discussion
Mr. Sheldon Tabas of 990 Wheeling Road said that several residents who
represent approximately 450 town homes and apartments attended the
December Safety Commission Meeting. Mr. Tabas, Mr. Jerry Johnson of 919
Boxwood Dr, Mr. John Phillips of 1019 Boxwood Dr. Robert A. Fox of 902B
Boxwood Dr, Mr. Stan Daniel of 1058A Boxwood Dr and Mr. Mark Kare of 1286
Wheeling Rd said the following:
1„ It is difficult and dangerous to make a left turn out of the 500 block
Dogwood Ln onto Wheeling Rd due to the volume and the speed of
traffic.
2. They witnessed several real accidents.
3. Due to the difference of traffic volumes, it makes sense for them to
move stop signs from Wheeling Road at Elderberry Ln to Wheeling
Road at the 500 Block Dogwood Ln.
Ms. Mary Stembridge of 600 Greenwood Dr said the following:
1. Every driver who wants to avoid the Elmhurst Rd/Kensington Rd/Rand
uses Wheeling Rd.
2. There is a speeding problem on Wheeling Road.
3. By moving stop signs, it could be dangerous for residents south of
Elderberry Ln.
4. More stop signs should be installed on Wheeling Rd (Sean Won said
that she could send a letter to him requesting new stop signs. Then
Sean Won will process that request).
Chairman ring said that stop signs do not slow down traffic. Chairman
Beening suggested moving only one southbound stop sign, not the existing
northbound stop sign. All six residents said that the real problem at the
intersection is the northbound traffic which stops at Elderberry Ln and speed up
passing the 500 Block Dogwood Ln. Therefore, this suggestion will not be
considered. Chairman Lee Beening also pointed out that we are going to' lose 2
parking spaces by relocating stop signs.All six Boxwood Area residents said
that losing 2 parking spaces is acceptable to them.
Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Chuck Bencic, moved
to approve the change recommended by the Engineering Staff:
The motion was approved by a vote of 8-0.
G) 4-WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST at SCHOOL ST & THAYER ST
a) Background Information
Resident Observations:
1) Witnessed several near collisions
12
2) Configuration of School Street
(slight curve through the intersection)
3) Speeding at this intersection
4) Children riding their bicycles on Thayer Street.
2. Staff Observations:
1) Accidents
There have been No Accidents at this intersection since 1992
The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant
(minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi -Way Stop
Warrants.
2) Speeding
A representative speed survey was performed on Thayer Street
west of School Street between Tuesday, October 8, 1996 and
Thursday, October 10, 1996. The 85th percentile speed which
are representative of this intersection were 30 - 31 mph while
the speed limits of School St & Thayer St are 25 mph.
3) Traffic Volume
The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant
is 500 vehicles/hour for eight hour periods (500 x 8 = 4000
cars/8 hrs). The traffic volume at this intersection (443 cars/8
hrs) is approximately 11 % of the stop sign warrant.
4) Sight Obstruction
A number of parkway trees are located at the intersection.
However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction
problems.
5) Survey Results
A total of 23 surveys were sent out in October, 1996 to collect
and analyze the resident's opinion. 16 surveys were returned to
the Village. 11 residents favored and 5 resident were against
the 4-way stop sign at School Street and Thayer Street.
The intersection of School Street and Thayer Street does not meet the
multi -way stop sign warrants.
Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended:
4-way stop signs at the intersection of School Street and Thayer
Street should not be installed.
13
b) Discussion
Sean Won summarized the stop sign study and said that this intersection does
not meet the stop sign warrants.
Mr. & Mrs. Penner of 203 North School Street said the following:
1.. Many children use this intersection to get to Busse Park (one block from
the intersection).
2. They asked Sean Won when the traffic counts were done (Sean Won
said that the traffic count was done in October).
3. There is a speeding problem.
4. School Street is offset by approximately 20 ft.
5. They understand that this intersection does not meet the stop sign
warrants. They requested new traffic counts be taken next summer
(New traffic count will be done in June of 1997).
Chairman Lee Beening asked what are the speed limits of School and Thayer
Streets. Sean Won said that the speed limits of these two streets are 25 mph,.
Commissioner Andy Mitchell said that there are no 25 mph speed limit signs
near the intersection. Sean Won said that he would check the intersection and
install the 25 mph speed limit signs, if needed.
Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Paul Bures, moved to deny 4-way
stop signs at School St and Thayer Street. The motion was approved by a vote
of 8-0.
The Engineering Staff will perform new traffic count in June of 1997 and bring
this issue back to the Safety Commission.
Chairman Lee Beening announced that Safety Commissioner Arlene Juracek submitted her
resignation to the Mayor due to her recent appointment to fill out the term of Trustee Skowron on
the Village Board.
Sean Won extended the Village's appreciation and holiday greeting to the Safety Commission
and presented each member with a gift.
14
VI. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 8-0 to adjourn at 9:10 P.M.,
upon the motion of Commissioner Andy Mitchell. Paul Bures seconded the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
Sean S.M. Won, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
15
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING
ATTENDANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 9, 1996
NAME ADDRESS PHONE NO.
-%�.tS .:6D Cai"� O�jZ-273D �6 r7 rah/ �c 1
40
3-57
r � � 10' 63c2 - In'
r
1MA2K K�+�Ls
ke,w d.\,A,
II ._k„__,.., nn .,.s Ina .n.--
;�S- H3
� U
2 ss-aS9�
PLEASE SIGN-UP AND PICKUP THE AGENDAI
(I
3 ko
LUxur-O
ON
CIO
0 1 c 0 o c o- . o o ES
5 `� w BUSS[ .v
cHMO C -, --
19 I ,03 tC,4 ;C:
• r5 {� 05 C5 105
c23 ° 6-09 110 _ 1C3
h { 11 112 a 7 11
1 CS V �
3 114 113
�� *r =; 1 5 i 15 1 15
�� r✓ i r'i t -� 1 17 1 B 117
e:nar Court 'I, ip 170 1 9
ALL K -,I
5 ids 125
4 7 W 123 127
119 M '9 9� 1-0 119
�y c{LD " 1 122 131 r�
�N 12.3
1 3 134 1 -/
.-. dE:NI'1. AV
1
V'r
� r
-
CNCSt C
skvw 203
2C5 2C5 2C5
125 0 207 2CB 2C7
2C9 210 LCc
a 211 212 2.1
6
{ 1 301
N
,1
I 3C2 3C?
., �
3
" lb
*" 5 3 r 5 1i *•�' ==; 3C5
�.
2 �wi 7 2 305 � 107
Ile
'
�N� C �� s a•2 � a N 313
N
3
QPC-• 3.5
(Sid. 11-9
�a
%ILLACE OF MOUNT PROSPECT STREET aND &CCRCSS MAP
100 SOUTH EVERSON STFEET ELK CRCYE 1CW%ISHiP (Sid. 11�
MOUNT PROSPECT. ILU.NOIS w,t/Z N.w.t/A S.c.tt-At-tt 3-�
w
z
w
Q
U)
W
PA P- 9 1 �J (;o A I
�f &GEST�v,
EXISTING BUILDING
Os7 6-FF 6
--------S-c= N0 �t ¢ 3 --------,
pa►'� fK
CENTRAL ROA
) a
EUCLID AVE
I
) DR NORTH
WAY OU7) 1565
Ch
EXISTING S70' SIGNS
m 1 Nal
DO OD LN
Owo %%LY TRA771
RELOCATING STOP SIGNP
FROM
DR
WAY
EUCLID SCKOOL
--rl 2 vp d CEDAR LN
>
1:3 ll�l DOGWOOD LN
0
0
d
ovloro
'I57 vpd ELZ)-P=--;:Ry L-N
z
RRY LN
IRONWOOD DR
KENSINVIDN RD
C)
Li
-
C
'J
I. LJ
W
LL
LL,J
ry
W
n
0
V)
Q
0