HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.2 Motion to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance and adopt an ORDINANCE GRANTING A FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION AND A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 605 WEST GOLF ROAD, MOUNT PRr�
Item Cover Page
Subject Motion to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
ordinance and adopt an ORDINANCE GRANTING A FINAL PLAT
OF SUBDIVISION AND A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 605 WEST GOLF ROAD, MOUNT
PROSPECT, ILLINOIS (PZ-15-25)
Meeting January 6, 2026 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE BOARD
Fiscal Impact (Y/N)
Dollar Amount
Budget Source
Category
Type
Information
N
NEW BUSINESS
Action Item
The ""Petitioner" (Jason Doland of Doland Engineering, LLC, on behalf of the property owner,
Trinity United Methodist Church) is seeking a final plat of subdivision and conditional use
approval for a preliminary and final planned unit development to subdivide the church
property, a single R-1 zoned lot into six R-1 zoned lots located at 605 W. Golf Road ("Subject
Property"). The Village Board has final authority over the final plat of subdivision and the
conditional use for a preliminary and final planned unit development. The proposal meets the
requirements and standards of the Village Code, and Village Staff ("Staff") is supportive of the
requests.
Di-gnwcmion
Background: The Subject Property was annexed into the Village in 1959 and is located on the
south side of West Golf Road, east of Linneman Road. The Subject Property contains an
existing church with associated improvements, is zoned R-1 Single Family Residence, and is
bordered by the R-1 Single Family Residential District to the north and west, the R-X Single
Family Residential District to the south, and B-3 Planned Unit Development properties (an
office building and a daycare) to the east. Permit records indicate that various improvements
have been made since the church's construction in the 1960s, including interior and exterior
remodeling work, signage, electrical, plumbing, fire suppression, roof, fencing, flatwork, and
parking lot.
Proposal: The Petitioner is proposing to create six residentially -zoned lots of record from one
parcel. The Petitioner also seeks conditional use approval for a preliminary and final planned
unit development (PUD). The various elements of the proposal are outlined below.
Final Plat of Subdivision: The final plat of subdivision proposes the subdivision of a single R-
1 zoned lot into six R-1 zoned lots. Lots 1 through 4 are intended for the development of
single-family residential homes, Lot 5 will remain as the church lot, and ""Outlot A" is a
separate lot designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1 through 4 and
for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5.
Parking for the Existing Church: A total of 112 parking spaces (106 standard and 6
accessible), are proposed with the new site plan configuration for the church lot (Lot 5). Based
on a Membership Audit for the last three years (2022-2024) provided by the church's pastor,
the church's highest recorded attendance is 150 worshipers, including online attendance. Per
the zoning code, one parking space is required for every 3 worshipers, resulting in a parking
requirement of 50 parking spaces. The parking provision of 112 parking spaces exceeds the
Village's parking requirement of 50 parking spaces.
Stormwater Management: The existing Trinity United Methodist site drains west towards
Linneman Road through a small detention pond installed as part of a previous addition. Both
the existing detention storage and outlet for the church property drainage are accounted for in
the design of the new subdivision. In addition, per Sections 15.401.A and 15.402. B of the
Village Code, stormwater detention is required for the homes built as part of the subdivision.
The stormwater runoff for the subdivision (the four residential lots plus Outlot A) would be
captured by a storm sewer system around the perimeter of the lots and directed toward
underground storage chambers in Outlot A. The small detention pond(s) on the church
property would be relocated to the open ground between the parking lot and Outlot A. The
discharge from the church detention pond(s) passes through the detention chambers for the
residential lots; the combined flow from the church and Outlot A detention facilities discharges
through a restrictor, controlling and slowing flow to an existing storm sewer in Linneman
Road. While the impervious area to be created by the new residential lots will increase
stormwater runoff, this additional runoff will be stored in the detention chambers such that the
flow to the existing storm sewers will actually be reduced below the existing runoff rates from
the undeveloped property.
Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development: Outlot A does not meet the following
subdivision standards under Section 15.305 and the bulk regulations required by Section
14.905. Section 15.305.B.4 requires that all lots shall have frontage on a public street. Outlot
A is landlocked and does not have frontage on a public street. Section 15.305. B.6 requires
that the depth to width ratio shall not exceed two and one-half to one (2.5: 1) for all lots. The
depth to width ratio for Outlot A is 10.35:1 and exceeds the requirement. Section 14.905
requires a minimum lot width of 65 feet. The lot width proposed for Outlot A is only 26 feet.
Section 14.905 requires a minimum lot area of 8,125 square feet. The lot area proposed for
Outlot A is only 7,001 square feet.
Due to several deviations from the zoning code and subdivision standards that are required as
highlighted in Table 1 and Table 2 in the staff report, the Petitioner is seeking conditional use
approval for a planned unit development. The planned unit development will be conditioned so
that the building elevations of the future homes that will be developed on Lots 1 through 4 will
not be identical or monotonous. As part of the approval, staff recommends that a Homeowners
Association (HOA) be created for Lots 1 through 5, encompassing Outlot A, for the required
stormwater management of the entire proposed subdivision. A condition of approval has been
added to ensure that the HOA document will be drafted for the Village's review and approval
prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for Lots 1 through 4.
Long -Range Planning: The Existing and Future Land Use Maps in the Village's
Comprehensive Plan designate the Subject Property as Institutional. Primary uses within this
category include governmental, educational, religious, and senior housing facilities. The
proposed development maintains a substantial portion of the site for institutional use while
introducing four new single-family residential lots along Linneman Road. These homes will
complement the established single-family character of the surrounding neighborhood. Overall,
the proposed development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use
designation.
Public Comments: The Village received one public comment letter from a resident that
resides south of the proposed subdivision that included photos of the water drainage issues on
her property.
Public Hearing: At the public hearing held on December 11, 2025, the Planning and Zoning
Commission reviewed a request for approval of a final plat of subdivision and a preliminary
and final planned unit development for the Trinity Church Resubdivision at 605 W. Golf Road.
The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the proposed subdivision of the property into
four single-family residential lots, one church lot, and an outlot dedicated to stormwater
management. Questions were raised regarding traffic access for the church, architectural
diversity requirements, and long-term maintenance of the stormwater facilities, with staff and
the petitioner explaining that the proposal met code requirements and would be subject to
homeowners' association oversight. The Planning and Zoning Commission and members of the
public discussed existing stormwater issues along the rear of proposed Lot 4, with the
petitioner explaining that new storm inlets and grading improvements would capture runoff
on -site and prevent discharge onto adjacent properties. Pedestrian access and sidewalk
connectivity to the church were discussed, with the petitioner noting that no direct connection
would be provided but that existing sidewalks along Linneman Road and Golf Road would
continue to serve pedestrians. Questions were also raised regarding preservation of a mature
tree along the rear of the site and whether the lots would be sold individually or to a single
developer, with the petitioner indicating a preference for a single developer but noting that
development controls would remain in place regardless. After discussion, the Planning and
Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requests, subject to the
conditions outlined in the staff report, by a vote of 4-0.
Revisions: Staff updated the conditions of approval for the planned unit development that
specifically requires that the planned unit development be constructed in general conformance
with the approved engineering plans. This condition was not part of the original Planning and
Zoning Commission's motions to recommend approval of the zoning requests, and must be
reviewed and approved by the Village Board.
Request to Waive Second Reading: The Petitioner requests that the Village Board waive
the second reading and take final action at the January 6, 2025, meeting.
Alternatives
A. Approval of the following motions:
1. A final plat of subdivision titled ""Trinity Church Resubdivision" prepared by Doland
Engineering, LLC, and bearing the latest revision date of September 9, 2025, attached
as Exhibit A in the attached ordinance; and
2. A conditional use for a preliminary and final Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting
of six R-1 zoned lots including four lots (Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4) that are intended for the
development of four separate single-family detached residential homes, one lot (Lot 5)
that will remain as the church lot, and one lot (Outlot A) that is a separate lot
designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 and for
accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to the conditions listed
in the attached ordinance.
B. Action at the discretion of the Village Board.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of the following motions:
1. A final plat of subdivision titled "Trinity Church Resubdivision" prepared by Doland
Engineering, LLC, and bearing the latest revision date of September 9, 2025, attached
as Exhibit A in the attached ordinance; and
2. A conditional use for a preliminary and final Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting
of six R-1 zoned lots including four lots (Lots 1, 21 3 and 4) that are intended for the
development of four separate single-family detached residential homes, one lot (Lot 5)
that will remain as the church lot, and one lot (Outlot A) that is a separate lot
designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1, 21 3 and 4 and for
accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to the conditions listed
in the attached ordinance.
Attachments
1. PZ-15-25 Staff Report
2. PZ-15-25 Final Plat of Subdivision
3. PZ-15-25 Plans
4. PZ-15-25 Administrative Content Redacted
5. PZ-15-25 Request to Waive Second Reading
6. PZ-15-25 Membership Audit
7. PZ-15-25 Public Comment Redacted
8. PZ-15-25 (605 W Golf Rd) Meeting Minutes
9. PZ-15-25 Ordinance
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect., IL 60056
1
STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development
InI 11,
Jason C Shallcross, AICP, CEcD Ann Choi
Director of Community Development Development Planner
DATE: December 4, 2025
CASE NUMBER
PZ-1 5-25
PUBLIC HEARING DATE
December 11, 2025
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER
Jason Doland, DoLand Engineering., LLC
Trinity United Methodist Church
(Sam Sangmyung Park)
PROPERTY ADDRESS&OCATION,
605 W. Golf Road
BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The "Petitioner" (Jason DoLand of DoLand Engineering, LLC., on behalf of the property owner, Trinity
United Methodist Church) is seeking a final plat of subdivision and conditional use approvaLfor a
preliminary and final planned unit development to subdivide the church property., a single R-1 zoned
Lot into six (6) R-1 zoned Lots Located at 605 W. Golf Road ("Subject Property"). The Village Board has
final authority over the final plat of subdivision and the conditional use for a preliminary and final
planned unit development. The proposal meets the requirements and standards of the Village Code,,
and Village Staff ("Staff") is supportive of the requests.
2024 Ae ri a L I m age
2025 Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Map
o
S,�ubject Property
Subject Property
EXISTING EXISTING LAND USE/
SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE
SIZE OF
ZONING SITE IMPROVEMENTS
North: R-1 Single -Family Residential
PROPERTY
R-1 Church
East: B-3* Planned Unit Development
4.43 acres
Single -Family
South: R-X Single -Family Residential.
Residential.
West: R-1 Single -Family Residential
I I '01�����"�
APPROVE l0000* APPROVE WITH
DENY
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
CONDITIONS
HAPLANTIa nning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 20251Staff Reports\PZ-1 5-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat-H na I PUD)Aou 1
BACKGROUND / PROPERTY HISTORY
The Subject Property was annexed into the Village in 1959 and is located on the south side of West Golf
Road, east of Linneman Road. The Subject Property contains an existing church with associated
improvements, is zoned R-1 Single Family Residence, and is bordered by the R-1 Single Family
Residential District to the north and west, the R-X Single Family Residential District to the south, and 13-
3 Planned Unit Development properties (an office building and a daycare) to the east. Permit records
indicate that various improvements have been made since the church's construction in the 1960s,
including interior and exterior remodeling work, signage, electrical, plumbing., fire suppression, roof,
fencing, ftatwork, and parking Lot.
PROPOSAL
The Petitioner is proposing to create six residentially zoned Lots of record from one parcel. The
Petitione r a Lso see ks cond itionaL use a pproval f o r a preLi mi na ry and f i na L plan ned u nit develop ment
(PUD).Thevariouselementsofthe proposal are outlined below.
Final Plat of Subdivision
The final plat of subdivision proposes the subdivision of a single R-1 zoned lot into six (5} R-1 zoned
Lots. Lots 1 through 4 are intended for the development of single-family residential homes, Lot 5 will
remain as the church Lot, and "Outlot A" is a separate Lot designated for stormwater volume control
and detention for Lots 1 through 4 and for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lots.
The
following table outlines the project's compliance
with the bulk regulation requirements
for the R-1
Single
Family Residential district.
Table
1: R-1 Bulk Regulations
R-1 Code Requirement
Proposed
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4
Lot 5 Outtot
Church A
Minimum Lot Area 8.,125 SF
9,343 99493 8,708 8,708
150,361 7,001
(Interior Lots)
SF SF SF SF
SF SF
Minimum Lot Width 65$
70-86' 70-86' 65' 65'
312.53' 261
Minimum Setbacks: 30'
30
62.40'
Front
Interior Side 7.1' (Lots 1-2)
10)
N/A
Un-
(Lots 1 -4) 6.5' (Lots 3-4)
buitd
Interior Side 20'
N/A
42 07'
abte
(Lot )
5
141.6519
Rear (Lots 1-4) 25'
1 25'
N/A
Rear (Lot 5) 20'
N/A
121-079
Max. Lot Coverage
. .........
Lots 1-4 45%
45%
N/A
Lot 5 75%
56%
Max. Floor Area Ratio 0.5
0.5
L 0-35* N/A
*Based
on a conservative estimate of the gross floor
area for a 2-story church.
HAP LANTia
n n i n g & Zoning C 0 M M \ P &Z 20251Staff Re po rts\PZ- 15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final
P [at-Fi n a i PU D). d ocx
2
, Ra., r k` Wn - Vi. � Q. I th Ch-ur c m i,
A total of 112 parking spaces (106standard and 6accessible), are proposed with the new site plan
configuration for the church Lot (Lot 5). Based on a Membership Audit for the last three years (2022-
2024) provided by the church's pastor, the church's highest recorded attendance is 150 worshipers.,
including online attendance. Per the zoning code., one parking space is required for every 3 worshipers
resulting in a parking requirement of 50 parking spaces. The parking provision of 112 parking spaces
exceeds the Village's parking requirement of 50 parking spaces.
The existing Trinity United Methodist site drains west towards Linneman Road through a small
detention pond installed as part of a previous addition. Both the existing detention storage and outlet
for the church property drainage are accounted for in the design of the new subdivision. In addition,
per Sections 15.401.A and 15.402.13 of the Village Code, stormwater detention is required for the
homes built as part of the subdivision.
The stormwater runoff for the subdivision (the four residential lots plus Outtot A) would be captured by
a storm sewer system around the perimeter of the lots and directed toward underground storage
chambers in OutLot A. The small detention pond(s) on the church property would be relocated to the
open ground between the parking Lot and Outtot A. The discharge from the church detention pond(s)
passes through the detention chambers for the residential lots; the combined flow from the church
and OutLot A detention facilities discharges through a restrictor, controlling and slowing flow to an
existing storm sewer in Linneman Road. While the impervious area to be created by the new
residential lots will increase stormwater runoff, this additional runoff will be stored in the detention
chambers such that the flow to the existing storm sewers will actually be reduced below the existing
runoff rates from the undeveloped property.
Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development
OutLot A does not meet the following subdivision standards under Section 15.305 and the bulk
regulations required by Section 14.905. Section 15.305.B.4 requires that all Lots shalt have frontage on
a public street. OutLot A is Landlocked and does not have frontage on a public street. Section
15.305.B.6 requires that the depth to width ratio shalt not exceed two and one-half to one (2.5:1) for all.
Lots. The depth to width ratio for OutLot A is 10.35:1 and exceeds the requirement. Section 14.905
requires a minimum Lot width of 65 feet. The Lot width proposed for OutLot A is only 26 feet. Section
14.905 requires a minimum lot area of 8,,125 square feet. The lot area proposed for Outlot A is only
7,001 square feet.
Tabte 2: Subdivision Standards
F .....Cod.-e Requ" ..... ir"" ..... e -- - me .... nt
Outiot A
15-305.B.4 ALL Lots shall have frontage on a public street.
LandLocked
Not met
15.305.B.6 The depth to width ratio shall not exceed two
10.35:1
1 and one-half to one (2.5:1 for all Lots.
Not met
Due to several deviations from the zoning code and subdivision standards that are required as
highlighted in Table 1 and Table 2, the Petitioner is seeking conditional use approval for a planned unit
H:\PLAN\Ptanning& Zoning COMWPU2025\Staff Reports\PZ-15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat—RnalPUD).docx 3
development. The planned unit development will be conditioned so that the building elevations of the
future homes that will be developed on Lots 1 through 4 will not be identical or monotonous. As part of
the approval, staff recommends that a Homeowners Association {HOA) be created for Lots 1 through
5., encompassing OutLot A, for the required stormwater management of the entire proposed
subdivision. A condition of approval has been added to ensure that the HOA document will be drafted
for the Village's review and approval prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
Lots 1 through 4.
LONG-RANGE PLANNING
The Existing and Future Land Use Maps in the Village's Comprehensive Plan designate the Subject
Property as Institutional. Primary uses within this category include governmental, educational,
religious., and senior housing facilities. The proposed development maintains a substantial portion of
the site for institutional use white introducing four new single-family residential Lots along Linneman
Road. These homes will complement the established single-family character of the surrounding
neighborhood. Overall, the proposed development wit[ be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's
land use designation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
As of this writing, staff has not received any public comments.
STANDARDS AND FINDINGS
The Planning and Zoning Commission shalt review the standards and findings of fact outlined in
Exhibit A and 1) accept them without changes, 2) accept them with changes, or 3) reject the findings.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shalt use the findings of fact to guide their recommendation to
the Village Board.
Staff finds that the standards for a conditional use and planned unit development have been met, as set
forth in the Petitioner's and staff's responses to the standards. Based on these findings, Staff
recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the
findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and r mcl_a,ppro a, of the following motions:
, _ _ )t_j
.-econimm-e-
1. Afinat plat of subdivision titled "Trinity Church Resubdivision" prepared by DoLand Engineering,
LLC, and bearing the Latest revision date of September 9, 2025, attached as Exhibit B in the staff
report;
2. A conditional use for a final Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of six R-1 zoned tots
including four Lots (Lots 1, 29 3 and 4) that are intended for the development of four separate
single-family detached residential homes, one tot (Lot 5) that will remain as the church Lot, and
one tot (Outlot A) that is a separate Lot designated for stormwater volume control and detention
for Lots 1., 29 3 and 4 and for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to
the following conditions:
a. Prior to obtaining the first temporary certificate of occupancy for Lots 1 through 4., the
Petitioner shalt submit homeowners' association documents for staff review and approval.
The document shalt address Long-term site maintenance., including the maintenance of
"OutLot A".
b. No sale of any parcel of Land shall be consummated until the final subdivision plat has
been approved by the Village Board.
HAPLAN\P(anning& Zoning COMMT&Z2025\Staff Reports\PZ-15-25 605WGolf Rd (Final Ptat_Fina1PUD).doCX 4
c. Any existing accessory structures located on Lots 1 through 4, including but not Limited to
the parking lot, playground equipment, Light poles, and traffic signs., shall be removed in
their entirety prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first home, but need not be
removed prior to recording of the final plat.
d. Architectural Diversity: To promote architectural diversity and avoid repetitive building
patterns, no single-family dwelling constructed within the Trinity Church Resubdivision
(Lots 1 through 4) shalt be similar in appearance to any single-family dwelling Located on
the same street within a distance of two (2) Lots in either direction of the subject tot.
i. Definition of "Similar in Appearance": For purposes of this subsection, two
dwellings shall be considered similar in appearance if they are identical or nearly
identical with respect to any three (3) or more of the following architectural
characteristics:
1. Primary roof form, including the dominant roof type (gable, hip, mansard,
gambrel, flat, or combination):
2. Roof height, measured from finished grade to the peak, within a tolerance of
+/- 2 feet;
3. Front -facing massing, defined as the approximate height and width of the
primary front wall plane closest to the front tot Line;
4. Overall front -elevation form, including the predominant silhouette and
massing as viewed from the street;
5. Fenestration pattern, including the relative Location., arrangement, and size
of windows on the front elevation;
6. Garage configuration., including the location, orientation, and dimensions of
garage doors visible from the street; and
7. Primary exterior siding materials on the front elevation wall planes (e.g...
brick veneer, horizontal siding, board -and -batten, shakes, or similar
materials).
ii. Characteristics Not Constituting Dissimilarity: The following characteristics,
standing alone, shall not be deemed sufficient to establish dissimilarity between
dwellings:
1. Variations in color;
2. Variations in roofing material;
3. Addition or deletion of minor decorative elements (including., but not Limited
to, dormers, cupolas, bay windows, belt courses, fan Lights, chimneys., or
ornamental features);
4. Reversal of plan orientation (right-hand/left-hand orientation);
5. Variation in window styles; and
6. Variations in height, width, or Length measurements of less than five percent
(5%), unless otherwise specified herein.
iii. Submission and Approval Requirements: Prior to issuance of any building permit
within the subdivision, the applicant shall submit:
1. A proposed set of building elevations for all planned home models; and
2. A streetscape diagram or tot assignment plan demonstrating compliance
with the spacing requirement established in this subsection.
The Director of Community Development shall review the submitted elevations and
tot assignments for compliance with the requirements of this subsection. Approved
elevations and Lot assignments shall be binding upon subsequent building permit
HAPLANTIanning& Zoning COMM\P&Z2025\Staff Reports\PZ-15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final PIat_FinalPUD),,,doCX
reviews.
e. All visible structures within the front yards of Lots 1 through 4 associated with the
underground stormwater management system shall be screened and aesthetically
enhanced, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director.
Required improvements may include, but are not limited to, decorative surface treatments
(such as stamped or stained concrete), landscape screening with shrubs and/or
ornamental grasses, or other beautification measures deemed acceptable by the
Community Development Director.
The Village Board's decision is final.
ATTACHMENTS: ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENT
(Zoning Request Application, Responses to
Standards, etc...) --.000
1concur:
Jason C Shallcross,,AICP, CEcD
Director of Community Development
PLANS
(Plat of Survey, Site Plan, etc.)
,00#` OTHER
(Supplemental Information,
Public Comments Received,
14411, etc...) -00
H:\PLAN\Ptanning& Zoning C0MM\P&Z2025\Staff Reports\PZ-15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat—Fina[PUD).docx
Exhibit A
Standards and Findings of Fact
CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS
Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance provides that a Conditional Use
shall conform to the following requirements:
1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental
to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare;
2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the
immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair
property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be Located;
3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;
4. That adequate public utilities, access roads,, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will
be provided;
5. That adequate measures have been or will betaken to provide ingress and egress so designed as
to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets;
6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current comprehensive
plan for the village; and
7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the
district in which it is Located, except as such regulations may., in each instance, be modified
pursuant to the recommendations of the planning and zoning commission.
The Petitioner states that the proposed subdivision will create four new single
family homes along Linneman Road, providing compatible infill development within an established
residential area while maintaining the existing church use on Lot 5. The Petitioner notes that the project
includes installation of a new underground stormwater management system that will improve on -site
drainage and reduce runoff to surrounding properties. The Petitioner contends that the new homes will
be consistent in scale and appearance with nearby residences and are expected to enhance
neighborhood character and property values. The Petitioner indicates that all necessary public utilities
exist along Linneman Road and will be extended or relocated as needed to serve the development. The
Petitioner asserts that the limited traffic generated by four new homes will have Little to no effect on
existing traffic volumes, and that the church will continue to access Golf Road. The Petitioner further
states that the proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan's single-family residential Land use
designation and complies with applicable zoning regulations., aside from the requested exceptions
necessary to accommodate site design and stormwater improvements.
5 ta.-s : Granting the proposed subdivision and conditional use for a preliminary and final'Ri n 9,s
planned unit development will not be detrimental to public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare as the development establishes single-family residential lots that are consistent with the
surrounding neighborhood character and maintains the existing church use, which has operated for
several decades. The design of the subdivision complies with applicable subdivision and zoning code
requirements related to building separation, Lot coverage and stormwater management. The conditional
use will not be injurious to the use or enjoyment of other property in the vicinity. The introduction of four
new single-family residential Lots are not inconsistent with the similarly zoned Lots to the north and west
of the subject property. The proposed planned unit development is conditioned so that the proposed
homes on Lots 1 through 4 will provide variations in the appearance of the buildings to avoid identical or
HAPLAN\Ptanning &Zoning COMM\P&Z 202515taff Reports\PZ-1 5-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat -Final PUD),,,docx 7
similar building elevations. Adequate public utilities, drainage, and related facilities are provided to the
site. The stormwater management design includes an outlot to accommodate volume control and
detention in compliance with MWRD and Village standards. Utility service connections will be provided
as necessary to each new residential lot in accordance with Village and utility provider requirements. The
project will not increase traffic volume or impact on -street parking as sufficient parking will be provided
for the church and each new single-family residential dwelling unit will provide off-street parking. The
proposed planned unit development is not contrary to the objectives of the Village's Comprehensive
Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for institutional use, which encompasses
governmental, educational, and religious uses, as well as senior housing. The proposed subdivision
retains a substantial portion of the site as an institutional use for the church white introducing a
compatible low -density residential component that aligns with surrounding Land uses. Based on these
findings, staff concludes that the proposed planned unit development meet the standards for a
conditional use and recommends approval of the requested conditional use.
GENERAL STANDARDS FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
Section 14.504.A of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance provides that a Planned
Development shall conform to the following requirements:
1. Except as modified by and approved in the final Planned Unit Development plan., the proposed
development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is to be Located.
2. The principal use in the proposed Planned Unit Development is consistent with the
recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village for the area containing the subject
site.
3. The proposed Planned Unit Development is in the public interest and is consistent with the
purposes of this zoning ordinance.
4. The streets have been designed to avoid:
a. Inconvenient or unsafe access to the Planned Unit Development;
b. Traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin the Planned Unit Development;
c. An excessive burden on public parks., recreation areas,, schools., and other public facilities
which serve or are proposed to serve the Planned Unit Development.
Rei-it i aw Fad,lngs: The Petitioner states that the proposed planned unit development complies with all
applicable Village zoning regulations for the residential district in which it is located. The Petitioner
contends that the development is consistent with the Village's Comprehensive Plan, which supports
residential use of the subject property. The Petitioner asserts that the proposal is in the public interest,
as it introduces four new single-family homes that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood
and will not alter the established residential character of the neighborhood. The Petitioner states that
each home will have direct vehicular access to Linneman Road., providing safe and convenient ingress
and egress without generating traffic congestion. The Petitioner further notes that the estimated
population increase of sixteen people (4 persons per home) from four new homes will have minimal
impact on local parks, schools, and public facilities.
taf S, f $_F:[n,diM: Except as modified by and approved in the final planned unit development, the proposal
complies with the regulations of the district in which it is located. The proposed subdivision and planned
unit development generally meet the intent of the underlying R-1 single -Family Residence District.,
providing single-family Lots that conform to applicable bulk., area, and yard requirements, except where
relief is requested as part of the planned unit development to accommodate OutLot A. The proposed
H:\PLAN\Ptanning& Zoning C0MM1P&Z20251Staff ReportsTZ-15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final P(at_FinatPUD).docx 8
planned unit development is not contrary to the objectives of the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The
Comprehensive Plan designates the property for institutional use., which encompasses governmental;
educational, and religious uses, as well as senior housing. The proposed subdivision retains a
substantial portion of the site as an institutional use for the church while introducing a compatible Low -
density residential component that aligns with surrounding land uses. The development will provide an
improved stormwater management infrastructure to the existing conditions providing a benefit to the
public interest. The new church Lot will utilize its existing driveway along Golf Road and close an existing
driveway on Linneman Road to accommodate the four new single-family residential lots that will have
their driveways along Linneman Road. No new public roads are proposed. Each single-family Lot will be
accessed via Linneman Road, and the reconfigured parking and circulation plan for the church lot will
maintain safe ingress and egress. The addition of four single-family homes is not expected to generate
traffic volumes that would negatively affect surrounding streets or place a significant burden on nearby
public parks, schools, or municipal services.
STANDARDS FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS WITH OTHER EXCEPTIONS
Section 14.504.0 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance states that the Village Board may
approve planned unit developments which do not comply with the requirements of the underlying zoning
district's regulations governing Lot area, Lot width., bulk regulations, parking and sign regulations, or which
require modification of the subdivision design standards when such approval is necessary to achieve the
objectives of the proposed planned unit development, but only when the Board finds such exceptions
are consistent with the following standards:
1. Any reduction in the requirements of this chapter is in the public interest.
2. The proposed exceptions would not adversely impact the value or use of any other property.
3. Such exceptions are solely for the purpose of promoting better development which will be
benef iciaL to the residents or occupants of the planned unit development as well as those of the
surrounding properties.
4. In residential planned unit developments the maximum number of dwelling units allowed per acre
shalt not exceed forty eight (48) units per acre for developments incorporating senior housing or
assisted Living facilities.
5. ALL buildings are to be Located within the planned unit development in such a way as to dissipate
any adverse impact on adjoining buildings and shalt not invade the privacy of the occupants of
such buildings and shalt conform to the following:
a. The front, side or rear yard setbacks on the perimeter of the development shalt not be Less
than that required in the abutting zoning district(s) or the zoning district underlying the
subject site, whichever is greater.
b. All transitional yards and transitional landscape yards of the underlying zoning district are
complied with.
c. If required transitional yards and transitional landscape yards are not adequate to protect
the privacy and enjoyment of property adjacent to the development,, the Planning and
Zoning Commission shalt recommend either or both of the following requirements:
i. ALL structures located on the perimeter of the planned unit development must be set
back by a distance sufficient to protect the privacy and amenity of adjacent existing
uses;
ii. ALL structures Located along the entire perimeter of the planned unit development
must be permanently screened with sight -proof screening in a manner which is
sufficient to protect the privacyand amenity of adjacent existing uses.
HAPLANTlanning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 20251Staff Reports\PZ-1 5-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat -Final PUD).docx
d. The area of open space provided in a planned unit deveLopmentshaLL beat Leastthat
required in the underlying zoning district.
rcM,
g-s: The Petitioner states that the requested reductions from the zoning requirements
are in the public interest, as they are necessary to accommodate a new underground stormwater
management system that will serve the subdivision. The Petitioner explains that OutLot "A," white
deficient in street frontage, width, and area, fulfills an essential public purpose by providing on -site
stormwater detention where none currently exists. Access for maintenance will be provided through
public utility easements along the Lot Lines. The Petitioner asserts that the proposed exceptions will not
negatively affect surrounding property values or uses and that the new single-family homes will
complement the existing neighborhood character and may enhance surrounding property values. The
Petitioner contends that the exceptions are solely intended to promote a better site design that benefits
both future residents and the surrounding community. The Petitioner notes that the subdivision complies
with the maximum allowable density for residential developments and that all required building
setbacks, transitional yards., and landscape buffers meet the R-1 District standards. The Petitioner
further states that the design maintains adequate open space within each tot consistent with single-
family residential development patterns in the area.
51affs-ERndings: The staff -supported relief requests for OutLot A are in the public interest and intended
solely to promote a higher -quality development, as the creation of a substandard tot is necessary to
accommodate a new stormwater management system that will reduce existing runoff rates and enhance
the overall efficiency and functionality of stormwater detention on the site. The addition of four single-
family homes is not expected to adversely impact the value or use of any other property. The proposed
planned unit development provides four new tots that wilt accommodate four singLe-famiLy detached
homes., far below the maximum density permitted. No senior housing or assisted Living facilities are
proposed. The project's overall density is consistent with the R-1 single -Family Residence District
standards and aligns with the established character of the surrounding area. The front, side and rear yard
setbacks for Lots 1 through 5 are not Less than that required,, and the overall Lot coverage requirement of
75% for nonresidential use (Lot5) and 45% residential uses (Lots 1 through 4 and the outLot) are met for
all six Lots.
HAPLANT[anning& Zoning COMM\P&Z2025\Staff Repoits \PZ-15-25605W Golf Rd (Final Plat_FinatPUD).docx 10
7,PLAT OF SUBDIVISION
TRINITY CHURCH
RESUBDIVISION
11 =I_ 61 - V lit: C AwlC �1 st-c'kiN 14 IO &15 AI E "111
E t -1AS7 Of TIC WreD M'k to "A 14 I-LI1 , A-t rif,�-
s E nOAD
a� OLr
#I e' ®_€ i0ijgF1t mfl.. 16 aI: �- -sue _ s € *-r4
..": #..
€t' fft #a Arqr- Arvt-* '-...OVI 'Veal . . 1;r 4A, 4- _4 ,...i
e `5
UJI T
_ _..fix
se § 0 f1%
€$1i 4.t5
Fes. `-c,@r €FFJ. P I
� q€ $W� A TA U" saI 11545u.' 0s7. fA"" a 4 1IICWd9 at3 �r%Ok
3
. e
�:-c
us
sI,Eck-Wi .%�€ate1:='L€€+z _ €'
fit.-��,[ � ���
'�4t. 10 4C
- t
K4s FW t� §W psi€. %!. €, I't U, alp €.MW €WA 0 11�A'W1 1
X s-3FSt � & ....... .. �', 's;t 'F --a=)�s�i€:6 ass-C fl. ��;�, -
LOT I
:i. 931 �ttm FI 11 '" `>$.. . .� and _ °
pa pr
N-1€=1co-1A.IC .. WTI-Ar-IT' €g 3 � - -
p1q WA st, RAF v- `z lti5 € aJA Ia wui 7q F I 4L
MAIWIE QRTMTE-
.�
€crM. �11 wo r1_m Est - s } pa �W'} -
a L D TIC &'W Lc - MIF 11 g I r• Cf s E L Al
M,TZN e
am 14 I e o
re
t �
O_
EmxU rx -T t€o"
�F3- _• 0 : r 93, IFF r, -= s amass
LOT 5
1J51 So FF
e
hu-Twf Max
t
Z
€ *'!ry 'MK €§ 93 r - W; S €i=I= pram r ' tv,
t
1
Wr4L- M W !Q IF'IF W-- =.MA *V t-- ,�E$€M D r, -�_ :;fit, _ -
-t � Wj to a ate; e� I t � I I- m . i e
P
. T _ ff
_, f LOT
p i94 IMIT wt
` -'f z! •T
m 54
w47_� .-
it . - m I -.€ umvp
Ln fkw at t€ c€S K eat 44A -4s Mu-` $6I €as-u- IN a A, R
-�W;. J11:% Via' ^ DEW M TO D&
u am € teaa
UA,
iC €!- Q .ZF AN ate-. MZ -.-,o- ff--rE ?L . a�
f'. i°FBI KA.t Ue 1 FDCL
--
Veyb OW
.0a
Rey; SEPTEMBER 9, 2OZ5
U025
a - u,e
Imo., . 6040 c&--7) p!!-34z7-&?AX
MN
mn
m
CA Cr
M r.0 C
Cr101111•
rx <•
U)
. 0
A
0
FINAL PLAT
PLAT 01,II, F SUBDIVISION
TRINITY CHURCH RESUBDIVISION
BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH,
RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
SURVEYOR
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
COUNTY OF COOK)SS
I, JASON R. DOLAND, A LICENSED REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SURVEYED AND RESUBDIVIDED
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON.
LOT A IN TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF THE EAST 7.38 CHAINS OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SEEGERS ROAD (EXCEPT THAT PART
THEREOF LYING NORTH OF THE PRESENT SOUTH LINE OF GOLF ROAD AND EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE
EAST LINE OF CHURCH ROAD 2.34 CHAINS; THENCE EAST 2.64 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 3.10 CHAINS TO THE CENTERLINE OF SEEGERS ROAD; THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG THE
CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD 2.78 CHAINS TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AS MEASURED ON THE EAST AND WEST LINES THEREOF, THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER)
CONTAINING 4.50 ACRES MORE OR LESS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 12, 1971 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 21477051, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
I, JASON R. DOLAND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED THE PLAT SHOWN HEREON AND THAT IT IS CORRECT; THE IRON RODS AND CONCRETE MONUMENTS WILL BE
PLACED IN THE GROUND AS INDICATED HEREON, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CITY CODE; THAT THE PROPERTY
IS WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, WHICH HAS ADOPTED AN OFFICAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN A
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA, AS IDENTIFIED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY ON THE MOST RECENT FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP#17031 CO212J,
EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 19, 2008.
NOTES
SURVEYOR - JASON R. DOLAND -P.L.S.#3546, EXPIRES 11 /30/2025
1) IRON RODS SET AT LOT CORNERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
CITY OFFICIALS
VILLAGE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES CERTIFICATE
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)SS
COUNTY OF COOK )
2) TOTAL AREA OF SUBDIVISION -- 193,614 SQUARE FEET (4.45 ACRES)
3) EXISTING P.I.N.
08-14-203-015-0000
4) EXISTING PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS:
605 W. GOLF ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
5) OUTLOT A SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION (HOA) COMPRISED OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS 1-5.
APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
PREPARED BY AND MAIL RECORDED PLAT TO:
ENGINEERING
TRINITY UNITED METHC
605 WEST GOLF ROAD
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
PLAT OF SURVEY
LOT A IN TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF THE EAST 7.38 CHAINS OF
WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERI
LYING SOUTH OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SEEGERS ROAD (EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF LYING NORTH OF THE PRESENT �
LINE OF GOLF ROAD AND EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE E
LINE OF CHURCH ROAD 2.34 CHAINS; THENCE EAST 2.64 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 3.10 CHAINS TO THE CENTERLINE OF SEEGE
ROAD; THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD 2.78 CHAINS TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AS MEASURED
THE EAST AND WEST LINES THEREOF, THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER) CONTAINING 4.50 ACRES MORE OR LEA
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 12, 1971 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 21477051, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Inv
Q
W
PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURES
ST1
PROP. CATCH BASIN
CLOSED LID
WITH 2" RESTRICTOR
RIM=664,60
I NVE=661,85 N
INV.= 660.64 E,W
ST2
PROP. STORM M.H.
RIM=664m5O
INVI=660-92
ST3
PROP. CATCH BASIN
RIM=664,50
I NVE = 660-94
ST4
PROP. CATCH BASIN
RIM=662,70
INV.=661.48 NE Existing
I NVE = 661-03 S
ST5
PROP. CATCH BASIN
RIM=664,50
I NVO = 661-35
ST6
PROP. CATCH BASIN
RIM=664.80
INVI=661.43
sn
PROP. INLET
RIM=662,70
INVN=661-39
ST8
PROP. INLET
RIM=664m2O
I NVE = 662-50
0
PROP. INLET
RIM=664,90
I NVE = 662-90
ST1 0
PROP. CATCH BASIN
RIM=664.90
INV.= 662.41
PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPES
ST1 00 1 PROP, 20 LF OF 15" PVC SDR-26 @ 022%
PROPOSED SANITARY STRUCTURES
SAN1
PROP. SANITARY M.H.
RIM=665,00
INV.=659.45
SAN31
REMOVE & REPLACE
EX. SAN. M.H.
RIM=665,65
INVE=662,05 6' E,NE (Existing)
INVE=660,39 8" SW (Proposed)
SAN21
PROP. SANITARY M.H.
RIM=665.90
INV.= 660.19
SAN41
PROP. SANITARY M.H.
(INSPECTION M.H.)
RIM=665.00
INVE=659-51
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPES
SAN1 PROP, 169 L,F OF 8' PVC SDR,26 @ 0.40%
SAN1 PROP. 50 L,F OF 8' PVC SDR-26 @ 0.40%
SAN1 PROP, 15 L.F OF 8" PVC SDR-26 @ 0.40%
CROSSING DATA
CROSSING#1
BTM, S" SAN, = 659.36
TOP W/M = 657,86
CLEARANCE = 1.5'
CROSSING#2
BTM, 12" STORM = 661,38
TOP W/M = 659,2
AP&M NMA Oft A IkOAftgm Aft A Aft I
CROSSING#4
BTM. 12" STORM = 66125
TOP OF 8" SAN, = 661,00
CLEARANCE = 0.25'
CROSSING#5
BTM. 12" STORM = 661.32
TOP W/M = 659,5
Inv
EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE
PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR URBAN SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.
CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH A DETAILED WORK
SCHEDULE WITH DATES FOR START AND FINISH OF
WORK ITEMS RELATED TO THE INSTALLATION,
MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES PRIOR TO THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING.
ILai IN] Lon [excel UT114111If1►[ltall 1race] ►641 Latvia lto] ►/:toI►'TjII116`t:1IE0:00]60IN] ►K911111:00] IW:T►`111Lai 0I•`1:/:1Inno] 01101W:T4W,ad►111:1»:011,T/11]mDorm IME1001to1►100Lai
INSTALL INLET FILTER BASKETS @ AND SILT FENCE. SEE ORDER OF INSTALLATION (BELOW).
2. MONITOR WEEKLY INLET FILTER BASKETS AND CLEAN AS REQUIRED.
3. KEEP CONSTRUCTION DRIVEWAY CLEAN AND FREE OF MUD AND DEBRIS, DAILY.
4. CLEAN PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, DAILY.
5. CLEAN CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA WHEN IN USE, DAILY.
6. AFTER THE INSTALLATION OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES HAS BEEN COMPLETED, THE FACILITIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM
SILTATION AND SEDIMENTATION AS WELL AS FROM DEBRIS AND FOREIGN MATERIALS FROM ENTERING THE SYSTEM AND SHALL BE CLEANED OF
SUCH IMMEDIATELY IF THESE TYPE OF OBJECTS/MATERIALS ARE FOUND WITHIN THE SYSTEM.
7. WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED REMOVE WASH OUT AREA.
8. WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED CLEAN THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND REMOVE THE SIGNS.
9. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN, PREPARED BY PAMELSELF, FOR FINAL RESTORATION OF LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR SOD AND PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFICS.
10. AT PROJECT COMPLETION AND WHEN DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND INLET FILTER BASKETS AND CLEAN
STRUCTURES(S).
mmmo ==D�� SF
2" x 2" WOOD POST
AT 5' SPACING
MIRAFI INC.
OR ENVIROFENCE
FILTER FABRIC,
OR APPROVED EQUAL
Z 5
t O
O N w
N
0
COMPACTED BACKFILL
&
O�
a
FLOW
MIN. 6"X6" TRENCH
•r
z
EXTEND FABRIC INTO TRENCH
v
N
A MINIMUM OF 6" VERTICALLY
AND 6" HORIZONTALLY
., , r"
STORM
NATURAL SOIL 1 X INLET
( PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS)
24,t 1a
36" D I.A, Pne
�o B
1sar�rirrrr�r�rtir
Kul r*0 "all
C
NOTES.,
,. APPROVED MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT NUMBERS FOR FRAMES AND LIDS',
PAVED AREAS (SOLID LID), EAST JORDAN 1050, EXTRA HEAVY DUTY, TYPE A SOLID COMER
PAVED AREAS (OPEN LID): FAST JORt AN 1050, EXTRA HEAVY DID, TYPE 10 0MI GRATE
ICON -PAVE[ AREAS (SOLID LICE), EAST JORDAN 1050, MEDIUM DUTY, TYPE A SOLID COVER
NON -PAVED AREAS (OPEN LID): EAST JORDAN 1050, MEDIUM DUTY, TYPE 01 BEEHIVE GRATE
2. SANITARY FRAMF;S AND COVERS FOR MANHOLES LOCATED WITHIN FLOODPLAIN AREAS AND RAVING A RIM ELEVATION BELOW THE FLOOD
PROTECTION ELEVATION SMALL BE WATER TIG , LOCI{ TYPE COVERS- NEENAH NO. R-16 -B OR APPROVED EQUAL.
3, ALL SANITARY LIDS MUST BE GASKET TYPE WITH CONCEALED PICKHOLES.
4. SOLI LICKS FOR VILLACE OWNED STRUOTURES MUST HAVE THE WORDS 'VILLAGE OF MOULT PROSPECT' AND HAVE THE NAME OF THE UTILITY
(WATER�SANITARY-STORM) CAST INTO THE LID.
S
[elm
GRASSA ! 1
1
SEE PAVEN
UNDER GR,
LlFrS
UB
UNDER, AN
MATERIAL
amI III jj� i7s:111
CONSTRUCTION
JOINTS 5'TYP.
(DEPRESS ACROSS DRIVEWAY MAX. & WIDER
THAN DRIVEWAY
PROPERTY LINE
NOTES
1. SIDEWALKS MUST HAVE A PLAIN BROOM FINISH.
2. NO WIRE MESH ALLOWED IN SIDEWALKS AND APRON.
3. SIDEWALK SHALL BE 6" THICK R
U DRIVEWAY AND 5T THICK IN
ALL OTHER AREAS IN R.O.W.
DRIVEWAY
SIDEWALK
4d® f
31F
4 •.
.41
Village of Mount Pros7r,
Public Works Department
1700 W. Central Rd.
- -I Oil 1111, ww".
-
A. REFERENCED SPECIFICATIONS
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING,
EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN OR ON THE PLANS:
* STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION), BY THE
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (IDOT SS) FOR ALL IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPT SANITARY
SEWER AND WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION;
* STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER AND SEINER MAIN CONSTRUCTION IN ILLINOIS, LATEST
EDITION (SSWS) FOR SANITARY SEINER AND WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION;
* Village of Mt Prospect MUNICIPAL CODE;
* THE METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO (MWRD) WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE AND TECHNICAL GUIDANCE MANUAL;
* IN CASE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE APPLICABLE ORDINANCES NOTED, THE MORE STRINGENT SHALL TAKE
PRECEDENCE AND SHALL CONTROL ALL CONSTRUCTION.
B . NOTIFICATIONS
1. THE MWRD LOCAL SEWER SYSTEMS SECTION FIELD OFFICE MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING
DAYS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK (CALL 708-588-4055 OR SEND EMAIL NOTIFICATION WITH
PROJECT NAME, LOCATION AND PERMIT NUMBER TO WMO]OBSTART@MWRD.ORG).
VILLAGE
2. THE OF MT. PROSPECT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 24 HOURS
PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND PRIOR TO EACH PHASE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL
DETERMINE ITEMS REQUIRING INSPECTION PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION OR EACH WORK PHASE.
B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION FOR THE
EXACT LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES AND FOR THEIR PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. IF EXISTING
UTILITIES ARE ENCOUNTERED THAT CONFLICT IN LOCATION WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION, IMMEDIATELY
NOTIFY THE ENGINEER SO THAT THE CONFLICT CAN BE RESOLVED. CALL J.U.L.I.E. AT 1-800-892-01 3.
C. GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS REFERENCE THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88).
CONVERSION FACTOR IS N/A FT.
2. MWRD, THE MUNICIPALITY AND THE OWNER OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO
INSPECT, APPROVE, AND REJECT THE CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS.
PIPE MATERIAL
11011101410111oxelIlralvaaI � I
REINFORCED CONCRET
CAST IRON SOIL PIPE
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE �
6-INCH TO 15-INCH DID
18-INCH TO 27-INCH D]
HIGH DENSITY POLYET
WATER MAIN QUALITY
4INCH TO 35-INCH
4INCH TO 12-INCH
14INCH TO 48-INCH
THE FOLLOWING MATEF
APPROVAL PRIOR TO PE
THE PIPE MATERIAL BE[
PIPE MATERIAL
POLYPROPYLENE (PP)
12-INCH TO 24-INCH DC
30-I NCH TO 60-I NCH TR
3. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL INDEMNIFY THE OWNER, ENGINEER, MUNICIPALITY, MWRD, AND THEIR AGENTS,
ETC., FROM ALL LIABILITY INVOLVED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OR TESTING OF THIS WORD
B. ALL SANITARY SEWEI
EXHIBIT R
605 WEST GOLF ROAD, MT. PROSPE(;'
COOK COUNTY , ILLINOIS
LOTS 11 21 3, & 4 IN TRINITY CHURCH RESUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
The Owner of the Development, with facilities as shown on this exhibit (Exhibit R), shall assume responsibility for the following perpetual
maintenance activities:
1. GENERAL
Regular inspections and routine maintenance of general areas shall be performed on a monthly or as -needed basis. Specific items of concern
include:
-- Litter and debris shall be controlled
-- Landscaped areas shall be maintained with regular mowing and restored with appropriate seeding/vegetation as necessary
-- Accumulated sediment shall be disposed of properly, along with any wastes generated during maintenance operations
-- Pavement shall be swept, vacuumed and/or washed on a regular basis
2. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
All components of the stormwater management facilities shall be checked monthly and maintained as necessary to ensure proper performance. It is
critical that all inflows and outflows to the detention facility are clean and performing as designed. In addition, the design volume of the detention
facility shall also be maintained. Inspections for the following specific items should be conducted monthly.
VEGETATED AREAS
-- Regular mowing to control vegetation
-- Need for planting, reseeding or sodding.
-- All vegetation must be maintained per the approved planting plan
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
-- Inspect restrictor and remove debris if clogged or discharge reduced
-- Remove accumulated sediment at outlet
-- Scour and erosion at outlet, repair as needed
-- Any ice damage to outlet of pipe, repair if necessary
ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
Letter View
Village of Mount Prospect,
Community Development Department
50 S. EmersoriStreet
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone: ('847) 818-53,28
Zoning, Request Appli+catian
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
E L A.- 17176 ",Lw I
...................... ... ............ .......... . ....
-------------------- =1
I I. Subjecrope
Ad,dress(e�6,05 W Golf Rd',
zoning DistrIct(s): R11 Property Area (S,q,Ft, and/or Acreage)., 4.43 acres,
-2 3-015-0000
Parcel (PIN(s): 08-14, 0
II. Zoning Request(s) (CInc kall that apply) I
0 Oond"Iftiona] Use: For Planned Unit Development
nw..y� Varlation(s),- To
Zoning Map Amen,dmentlrom, TO
Zoning'Text,Amendment: Section(s)
Other. Final Plat of Subdivision
rioces
lnmaryq!� rPp4Oa,,(U 0 PA jf
Trinity United Methodist Church would I'like, to create 4 resWentia' lots dilvildled from t, e"ir, current church, (6 toots)
ewinlg,
Name-., Jason Doland Corporation,: Doland Eng,iln LLC
A
dd ress: I
334 E. Colfax, Street, Un"t C
ClItyp State, ,ZIP Code: Palatln,e IL 60 67
Phonel: Email.:
Interest n P roperty:
Check if Same as Applicant
Name: Trinity Meth Church
Address: 605 W Golf Rd:
Cify, State, ZIP Code: Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Phone:
Application Record.htm 12
MEMO
IILetter View
( P r1l'i nt or Type N a m e) Jason Doland
D a, t eO -
I herebydeslignate theapplicant to act, as my ageest(s) described 'I'n tKi's
application and the associated supporting material.
to] !IMI I 1 11 "
fi lo -.///C.,tU sorsliacho Ioad sJZon i nip Application Record. htm 2/2,
Vi t La ge of M ou nt P ros, p e c t
vgnm
aisi at,t, suipporting
In consideration of th�e� infbrmat"J'on Contalned in th�iIs pletition as m Lit,
d, lol,,cu�rn�ent�a��t��ici�n��,01 ft, is ve
requestleld thlat.approval, �bille! gIn to thlis request. The ap�pticaniIt s, the ownler or
0
aulthorlized representative of! the owner of' the prollperty. The petitioner, and tie owner of t�e prop,erty
I I I
gran't empLoyeles ,of the Vittage of Mount Prospect a!nid thlel'r agent's plemissmion to,, enter on the
property c1huring reasioniable hours for lvisual, Iinspection, of thel, subject property.,
I hgarleby affirm that attlinformiation provided herefn and lin all, rniaterJaLs submitted In assoletaton
0 a Licalitillion a
with ppil artruel and ��ccurate 'to the, bleat of ray knilowLieldge.
1 J
Appant* Je lo, Date
Ucl
Signaturle
4,><0010
--
I hareby designate the applicant, to act as my ag�ent 'foll�r the p�ur�plol&e of' seeking 'th�e zaning, req!uestO)
ci
diellseribeld ir,i� tt,iis: appiti ation and the assoclated supplorting material.
Pro,perty Owner
(Signature)
(Rrifit or Ty,ple Name)
Prospect
Vill
age, ofM ol u nA
0�01 mlope
ment Departmint� imunity De,v,e
It
50 S. Emerson Strele!
Mount Prospect, ROnoJJ<
lis 601056
Rhoinle.�- (847), 818-51328
EM=
STATE 0 F I LLI N 0 IS
A X*,,.Under oIa�th�, statiel that I a
(print name)
t"he witle owinier olfthe property
an owner of -the pricipierty
121n alUtholrized officer for the owner: of thre property
Commonly delsicribed
OR,
(p rol p e, rtyl d re ss a In d P I N)
10 1, "1
fivkv;
owne
AVI
A as, of thi,si date,,
d by, kjt�/4/61R
and thatsuch property 1' . ........ I — .. ..... - . .....................
(p r in It n a im e)
. ............ . .
S'llginature
2,0
Nl'
ji�ii
/9 ww "� � "NM l
orthe,�rn�11:1�i�nois', Conference
S
OF THE,, UNITED METI-10D], 1,T CHURCH
303 1. Wx,kier Do
2020 Chicag, IL 60601
Offi Ce (312) 34G-97 6 6
ajatoist'ri perj'ntendant
v. BrAtany Is "'ct Su
p
Lake. North District - Re
M.785 Corg,
b1saaclAilmn"
312-346-9766
I
Rev. SangMyung Sam Park
i
154,,5 Sycamore Lane
Aurora, IL 6051,04
Dear Rev. Park,,
Greeti�ngsii in the grace wet share 'InChn"st.
i behalf of Bishop Dian Schiweriin avid the Nlorthern K[ihois Conference CaNnet, it is my pleasurie
to
i
n,d Tri t Uited n'! Melithio6ist conffrm 'your, appolintmient to� the community of Mount Prosiplect a int y
Chur,ch, effOictive July, 11 , 2,024,, The Bishopand Gabi,net are committed to,: yoiurappoinitment for the
follo,,Mng missional reasions:
lie We
all
oil 0,
Wr W
01,
it
you and Reiv. Wendy Hardin Flierimanni,
In additiw to �la�y and 6'1'erg iog, i is,, my expectat"on that
y traji n
the
spen -h othe r over the next few mo nths wo�rkpinl, currielint pastoir,,, will; �d time cornimunicating with ea,c
to ensure the church is cared fo�r in this, time of changie.
Please do niot hesitate to be, in touch if you havie any furtheir quiestwilions=
Rev. Rrittanylls,aac
Lakle North Distrilict, Superintendent
Northern Illinois Conference yyom,,umqn11C.Gr,9
The Uniteld Methodist. Church movvirw I'c'.10
M32=
E
Note: The above; amountsare'lliustrationS of how much, government debt could be attributed tio your property, biasIed on, Its
2024 value.,
See Details Hierie
Incorrect Image?. Click Herel.
Property Location,: Mailing Information:
605 W GOLF RD No Wifing Address Found
MOUNT PROSPECT IL 600156-0000 Update Your [tiformation
Volu,Tte-., 049
jr;k's I Oil!
htt,ps-.//.cod kcount,ytroa,si,uror.comlyourp,,,r' 'e�rviewrosuh,s.as,px 1/5
Original BMW Amountim
.
,,,/,
it � �
;/i if,
'
iJo it /mii
T�
'/�
3/1
i ii
n»i
Current Amount I$0.001
/ , r
' p l' i I �,i, ° ! ,,� i i 1, $0.01
0
1na III u . �i $0.00
Due Date.
12 `24
"x-. $0.00
Current Amount Du I
Number
This Property Index li
WTI 'I .iffi',bytt/lhe Cook
s " fi;I o
Year 20,21
Original Billed .
$0.00
Due Dates
, �2;2/
-yaww"
"dill 77/ 1 0
I ,,,, ,,, ;, �,,
......... 11/11,
„
71
CurrentDue
Total Amount
$0.00
Tdtal Amount", d: $0.00
ri 1n1 111 . $0.00
Due Date-.
12115/20,25
fax. $0.00
Interest,$0.00
..'urrent Amount Due:
This Property;l' ;i ,(PIN) ihas been ildet,,tflfied by the, Cook County Assess&s Office to
Yew 2021,4.
About rws. Payments are recorded twee ate are recei'ved. Thhey appear
website about three business days later.
General Property,
U n,
This Property Index N' mber (PIN) has beein id entiffied by the Cook Cou ty Asseszor's,Of to be,
exemptotaxation a 2023. Therefore,
Year, 2023..
Tax Year 2024 General Pirop" Taxes.
ThisPropertyindeXN'l.1 ber (PIIN) hais been Identified by the Cook County,Asseszor's Office to be
exempt for Tax tie, aProperty bill exists for Tax
"1,2J2j25,, 2:39PM Gook County Treasurer's Office - Chicago, Illinois
Stop receiving your tax bill by mail.
SlIgnup'f'or, eBilifing to receive f uture tax bills, vla emai"Il.
Are There Any Overpayments on Your PIN ?'
Ou rrecio rd s do not [""n,,,diicate a ref un d ava ii, I abi e on the P I N you have en'te red.
Homeowner Exemption:
Sentor Cifizen Exempti,
Senior Freeze Exemption:
Retumm"ling Veteran Exemption:
Disabled Person Exemption:
Disabled Veeran, ftemption:
Apply for a missing, exemiptilon
1 11 11 I I �
qF
'2024,
2023
2022
2021
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO,
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO,
NO
NO
NO
N'O'
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Tax'Year' 2004:
$0.010
Tax Year, 2024-
$0.001
Difference,:
14- $0.00
Percent Change.:
N/A
See, Yo u r co m p lete p ro p e rty ta x h i slo, ry.
htt,Ps-.//.coy kcount,ytroa,si,uror.comlyourp,,,rve�rviewrosuh,s.as,px 3/5
Doland
�E N G I 1'1,�,,J, E E �R 1 [,,4, G
Ms. Ann Choi
Development Planner
Community Development
Viflage of'Mount Prospect
50S,outh Ernersonstir eet
Mount Pirospect,,, llfinois, 600,56
RE: Triiniity Church
605 West GolfRoad
Dear Ms. Ch6i:
Enclosed are th ites,ponsesto the PUID Conditional Use Standards, f6r, the above captioned
project
Il 4.203(l )(8):� Co�n d I�tl'io�n all se Stae, shall �be, recornrnended� for
approval bythe Rlanning and� Zoining Commission unless, it finds:
a. Teat the establishment, maintenance, or opera,tion ofthe conditionaluse Will not be,
detriirnentalto,, or endangerthpublic heafth,, safety, morals, comf6rt, or geneiral welfare;
I
Response: The proposeduseof the an will addfour (4) inew single f iiii] iresidences,
'to the, itesiidential area aloing an existing Ville street (Lininemain Road) with a proposed
undeirgrountormwater system,that will accommodate and managethe stormwateir,
W4ich curirently does inot exist.
b. That the coire dition4l use wiEl not be iiiiinjurious tothe uses, and enjoyment of of it property
in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already perrnitted,i nor su�bstantially it
and iiiiimpair propeirty values, within the ne�ighborh� iiin which it isto be located-;
Res,pons,e:: The proposuse will fit in inicely with the, existing homes,to the south and�
west ofthe five (5), lot subdiVisiom, The e,'kisting surroundiingi home ) property vaIve
wouId not be negatively impacted as,to their value and iiiiifanythingi the proposed inew
homeswoulirobably increase iiiiinthe[r value. The e,'kisting church located on Lot, 5,1 wil]�
remain as, a p1ace ofworshiip with no changes, in made to the structure,Le. y status,
quo.
c., That the establishment of the conditionaI use Will not impede the, inorimal and orderly
development animprovement ofthe surirounding piroperty for uses permitted inthe
distriictl;
.1
Doland. Engineering, LLC. Do 1inid E n g i niee ri ng.co ern 33 4 E. Co I finx S treat, Su ite CO Pa I n tiro o.:�, I Iliin i s 601067
605 W Golf Road — PUD Conditional Use Responses 12/02/25
Page 2 of 5
Response: The surrounding R-1 residential zoning district area is fully developed at this
time only having the possibility of potential tear -downs and rebuilding of any existing
homes, which would in all likelihood be larger in size.
d. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have
been or will be provided;
Response: Public utilities currently exist along Linneman Road, which will be tapped into
for potable water, sanitary and storm sewer use, as well as gas, electric and cable
systems for the four (4) proposed homes. The existing church's sewer and water utilities
will be relocated within proposed utility easements. The four (4) proposed home
driveways will have direct access to Linneman Road. Stormwater Management facilities
meeting Village and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District requirements have been
incorporated into the site improvements engineering design.
e. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so
designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets;
Response: The additional traffic from the four (4) new driveways that will be added to the
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume is insignificant and has little to no effect on the
Linneman Road traffic volume or congestion. The church access will remain off of Golf
Road.
f. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current
Comprehensive Plan for the Village;
Response: The Comprehensive Plan of the Village shows the area to be in the R-1
Single Family Residential Zoning District, and the proposed subdivision meets this
objective.
g. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations
of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be
modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission;
Response: The proposed PUD meets with the Village requirements for the type of use
proposed under this subdivision, except for the requested variations needed and
necessary for Village compliance in order to improve and construct the proposed four (4)
new homes.
14.504(A): General Standards:
1. Except as modified by and approved in the final planned unit development plan, the
proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it
is located.
Response: The proposed PUD meets with the Village requirements for the type of use
proposed under this subdivision and complies with the Village regulations of the
residential district.in which it is located.
605 W Golf Road — PUD Conditional Use Responses 12/02/25
Page 3 of 5
2. The principal use in the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the
recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village for the area containing the
subject site.
Response: The proposed single family residential subdivision use of the land (site) is
consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village.
3. The proposed planned unit development is in the public interest and is consistent with
the purposes of this zoning ordinance.
Response: The purpose of the zoning ordinance is to ensure that land uses are
consistent, compliant and are in harmony with the adjacent and surrounding area. The
four (4) new proposed single family homes are of the same type of housing that
surround three (3) sides of the proposed subdivision. The proposed property
improvements will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood.
4. The streets have been designed to avoid:
a. Inconvenient or unsafe access to the planned unit development;
Response: Linneman Road is an existing north/south paved street which each of the
four (4) new driveways having a safe and convenient ingress and egress for access.
b. Traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin the planned unit development;
Response: There are no new streets proposed with this subdivision as all four (4)
homes will each have one driveway as access to Linneman Road, there will not be
any congestion created, or existing conditions compounded and made worse by
these four (4) proposed homes.
c. An excessive burden on public parks, recreation areas, schools, and other public
facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned unit development;
Response: The estimated population, at 4 persons per home is 16 people, which will
have very little impact on any of the public facilities as this would have been
considered within the residential zoning aspect of the area.
14.504(C): Standards For Planned Unit Developments With Other Exceptions:
The Village Board may approve planned unit developments which do not comply with the
requirements of the underlying zoning district's regulations governing lot area, lot width, bulk
regulations, parking and sign regulations, or which require modification of the subdivision design
standards when such approval is necessary to achieve the objectives of the proposed planned
unit development, but only when the Board finds such exceptions are consistent with the
following standards:
1. Any reduction in the requirements of this chapter is in the public interest.
Response: Outlot "A" is created for the sole purpose of providing underground
stormwater management (that currently does not exist) of which the ownership and
maintenance will be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association that is to be
created as part of the subdivision plat and documents. Section 15.305(B)(4) requires
frontage on a public street. Outlot "A" does not have frontage on a public street,
605 W Golf Road — PUD Conditional Use Responses 12/02/25
Page 4 of 5
however; access for any required maintenance is provided by means of the proposed
public utility easements located along the property lines of the four (4) lots. Section
15.305(6)(6) requires a lot depth to width ratio of not more than 2.5:1 and the ratio of
Outlot "A" 10.35:1 which exceeds this requirement but does accomplish the goal of
providing the area necessary to install the underground stormwater management system
for the subdivision. Section 14.905 requires a minimum lot width of 65 feet for Outlot "A"
which has a width of only 26 feet, but; as stated earlier, accomplishes the intended goal
for the area needed for the stormwater management system. Section 14.905 requires
that Outlot "A" have a minimum lot area of 8,125 square feet which Outlot "A" is deficient
by 1,124 square feet or 7,001 square feet provided under the proposed lot dimensions.
The constraint conditions placed upon the design are unique to the proposed
subdivision in order to meet the Village requirements but do not generally effect the area
or its residents. Village staff believes that seeking a PUD for the subdivision would be an
appropriate method in order to satisfy the requirements imposed on the design.
2. The proposed exceptions would not adversely impact the value or use of any other
property.
Response: Other properties values and use in the area would not be adversely affected
with the additional four (4) homes.
3. Such exceptions are solely for the purpose of promoting better development which will
be beneficial to the residents or occupants of the planned unit development as well as
those of the surrounding properties.
Response: The proposed homes will fit into and fill in the single family residential area
nicely and should add to the surrounding property values.
4. In residential planned unit developments, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed
per acre shall not exceed forty eight (48) units per acre for developments incorporating
senior housing or assisted living facilities.
Response: The homes are designed for single family living and are not built solely for
senior citizens or assisted living conditions, however it could be that some family
member having these characteristics might be living within the home, particularly with
the aging population.
5. All buildings are to be located within the planned unit development in such a way as to
dissipate any adverse impact on adjoining buildings and shall not invade the privacy of
the occupants of such buildings and shall conform to the following:
a. The front, side or rear yard setbacks on the perimeter of the development shall not
be less than that required in the abutting zoning district(s) or the zoning district
underlying the subject site, whichever is greater.
Response: The setbacks meet the Village Zoning requirements of the R-1 Zoning
District.
b. All transitional yards and transitional landscape yards of the underlying zoning district
are complied with.
605 W Golf Road — PUD Conditional Use Responses 12/02/25
Page 5 of 5
Response: All transitional yards and transitional landscape yards of the R-1 Zoning
district are met and comply with the Village requirements.
c. If required transitional yards and transitional landscape yards are not adequate to
protect the privacy and enjoyment of the property adjacent to the property to the
development, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend either or both
of the following requirements:
(1) All structures located on the perimeter of the planned unit development must be
set back by a distance sufficient to protect the privacy and amenity of adjacent
existing uses;
(2) All structures located along the entire perimeter of the planned unit development
must be permanently screened with sightproof screening in a manner which is
sufficient to protect the privacy and amenity of the adjacent uses.
d. The area of open space provided in a planned unit development shall be at least that
required in the underlying zoning district.
Response: The proposed homes are within the limits of the building setbacks within
the R-1 Zoning District leaving the lot with single family residential yards as open
space.
I trust that this addresses the Planned Unit Development Conditional Use Standards required
for approval of the Subdivision Plat and intended single family residential use.
Sincerely,
M J
�u d
`son R. Doland, P. E., P. L.S.
PLAT OF SURVEY
L-DiT A N TMly LANIED M MI-7 -'-IILMDi SWDCvS,CNj UAG A RiBUMSI-ON Cf TIC. PART Cf TIC W- T 1.36 DWS%S 1Y MEL
!!TST ATOF TT WRT OWER OF SECT -4, TOVISHIP 41 MaUH, RAiCE 1.1 W' OT THE TRRD PMM Wumlokli
ll JGF T-F CRUVAL CVF54 U%E UF 5it-MiFER5 wlw .,EXCEFr Tw izw THE-HECT LYNG Wpti or THE ' 93t"
LNE GF GDJ RGAD AW MC.EF-TtW PAU 7MSMEE3 AS WWWEKM Wr TH! POW Gr -PFEI?St- N 07 THE U-ST
IjW-- OT &M6i ROM 2,34 CKUWS' -
; PT
71=�U REJ 2 &4 C&A-0- f0fFH 2-10 DS 7G TIE C9477PLINZ 0,- s[DaUts
MWLp B ON
RW-ME WTHOM kDOM HE CENTR UNIF Cr SMD 7m THE
2:6 C T 0 OF RE� - RAGE KjNANk� C
SHE EAST AN3 WE LINES THERET, 4E SMITH UNE Of SND w awkuj CAMW A 50 ACRES WORE OR LES,
- - 1 ' 1. M C---ZCK M T - 0 ODCaRDMG -0 Tf�� VIAT TF &W 12- 19-11 LS =WEW IUMHU, � CM LA �r LLNOS
f
THCOWMAS TO TFE CUR UT LUMS MHMA SlM24�5 " A 5WK9W
SuRwfl
CNAARE n!R KIWIS BEFOW KiLD14:1 8Y THE '--,W W RERWT A JOY WPEWH "ICMIATCLY-
C�K !Gk 01 lKA WqH DEED AND REN RT AW MCR= vvvENMX KFER TO TM-1 R-Wo
OR -ALAG! ZOlk-W CL7C--- " F A0017OWL EASE OF BUILINIK LINES WX 'SHMN HtfUk
5WE a IuNGT�
a
Muhn
% AO K DAPa AN ID PRNE-SHMAL LAND St,,R 9, to
HEFtEw c Fy s4T THE -Amrt M�mEa plwun
LDS TLAWSO, A MEL NAURN PZPiEBEtftb 04
111! PLU l.U=N URNM
OR"WENS ARFF %QA, iN FTf-; AND D17CW-M, PARM TI=Mt-;'f
MID Al ""I- LUt*e--
...... .......
....... .......
....... .......
....... .......
...... ........
... .......
...... ......
7.1.1. 7.1
.. . . .. . . ... . ...
. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . ..............
. . .. . . .. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . . ... . ...
..............
..............
. . . . . . . . . . . ..............
. . . . . . . . . . . ..............
. . .. . . .. . . .. . .
.............
............ .............
. . . . . . . . . . .............
. .. . . .. . . .. . .
.............
.............
E.............
.............
.............
. .. . . .. . . .. . .
.............
. .. . . .. . . .. . .
.............
. .. . . .. . . .. . .
.............
xwwr Comm
ET'N C, 2'1
fw USE
w OF
W-14-YW-3M
LOT 3 LO
LOT LOT 2 r'
DGLAN"'D ENGIN
wa kcsns BL Ax U TAU-, wmvsm M- -_p CAM ST
FAIA13-7- ILU
Vw -50138 tR
I
m
"n
Trinity United Methodist Church Parcel Legal Description
LOTA IN TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF
THAT PART OF THE EAST 7.38 CHAINS OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SEEGERS ROAD (EXCEPT
THAT PART TH EREOF LYING NORTH OF THE PRESENT SOUTH LINE OF GOLF ROAD AND
EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF
INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF CHURCH ROAD 2.34 CHAINS; THENCE EAST 2.64
CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 3.10 CHAINS TO THE CENTERLINE OF SEEGERS ROAD; THENCE
SOUTHWEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD 2.78 CHAINS TO THE PLACE OF
BEGINNING AS MEASURED ON THE EAST AND WEST LINES THEREOF, THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER) CONTAINING 4.50 ACRES MORE OR LESS, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 122 1971 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 21477051, IN
COOK COUNTY, I LLI NOIS.
D,�ol�and
�1� ����,�,n��,��„ IIII ���,�,��I�^� ,, s�w��„n�,�,�� Ij�rt��,�n�� �Ip�I�yp���,a��,�,n�,�, I�p�pry�V �n�,x������,
umuHa uHaou �r�fl...., "e" ;� Icy m�nvHwircu I'wioMi�ouuum, IlAl�ry`�"p�' m� I ilV�¢"'N�I fiMa„iic�uu� iu�uuHani,
December 30, 2025
Jason C Shallcross, AICP, CEcD
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Via email: jshallcross@mountprospect.org
Dear Mr. Shallcross,
As you will recall, The Planning & Zoning Commission recently recommended approval of the
Trinity United Methodist Church subdivision by a 4-0 vote. Our subdivision request is scheduled
to go before Village Board for the ordinance's first reading on January 6, 2026.
We are requesting that the Village Board waive the second reading, tentatively scheduled for
January 20, 2026, and take final action at the January 6, 2026, meeting because we are anxious
to start the project as soon as possible.
I appreciate your assistance in facilitating this request. Should you have any questions, feel free
to contact me via email at jdoland(a�-dolandengineerinq com or on my cell at 847-508-6363.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jason R. Doland
Doland Engineering, LLC. 1 8,47991.5088 1 DolandEngineering.com 1 334 E.ColfaxStreet, Suite C, Palatine, Illinois 60067
Dear Jason Doland,
I pray this letter finds you well and in grace. I wanted to share our worship
attendance figures over the past three years. I believe these numbers reflect the
trends that shape our worship life.
Here are the attendance numbers from 2022 through 2024.0
2022 -150 (Including Online Attendance)
2023 -100 (Excluding Online Attendance)
2024 -11'7 (Excluding Online Attendance)
All. supporting documents are attached to this letter.
I want to sincerely thank you for your service. If you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact me or the church office.
Rev. dam Park
Church Membership
Average Worship Attendance
Trinity United Methodist church
Mt. Prospect, IL #1049
Rev. Sam Park
Membership * Aud*t I
MembersWp& Attendance SupIMa�,,j,-
10/1, 192 191
............. ....
By Confession of Faith - 2
Jacque Quick.
Pam Vazquez
Transferred from another UMC - 6
Beverly Adam's, Jim Adams
Jacki Hamilton, Dave Hamilton, Kim Hamilton
Helen Sharp
Removed From MemberLin
Transferred to another UM C —2
Jennie Schumann
Tom Weaver
Death - 9
5/13/2024
Don Beelow
10/30/2023
C I aude Bjork
1/23/2024
Marcy Dub
11/13/2023
Gerald Farley
3/6/2024
Jan Froberg
11/12/2023
Doug Lattner
8/24/2024
Lois Mrzlack
3/10/2024
Joan Robertson
2/28/2024
Dorothy Sissors
10120/23,11:20 AM
UMCNIC - Registration
Northern Illinois Conference
I The United Methodist Church
'%-'.fhurch
Mount Prospect: Trinity - 1043
Name of person submitting report Email of person submitting report
1I1endy_,1�ardin Hermann pasorwertdytrinitymp�or.
g
Current church membership Average worship attendance
192 ..._ 1-0 not induding Facebook check-ins/views
Sunday school membership Sunday school average attendance
50 35
Worship Service times and styles Brief history of congregation *
10:30 Blended Worship Nov. 24, 1957. First organizing meetings with MP residents and the D.S.
May 18,1958: Church Chartered, Don Thomas appointed pastor
May 15, 1960 First Sanctuary built (cornerstone laid)
May 1972. Current Santuary consecrated (cornerstone 1971)
1963. Education Wing completed
2000 Nursery Wing completed
1996. Began our ministry With PADS/Journeys
1998 Memorial Center established
2020. Became a member of the Reconciling Ministries Network
4k I
IF W L7-!:m I I F3 VI I V-11111 film 61T I I Le 11114! Iff L--1 F�t 4 loll Flat] 61--wfitin I I a ILVIT
i mills,
What are your core values as a congregation?
Faith, compassion, inclusiveness, diversity, curiosity, relevance, community
1. 1/22/22, 7:00 PM UMCNIC - Registration
Northern Illinois Conference
I The United Methodist Church
Profile of the Local Church**
This profile will be on file with the District Superintendent to expedite the appointment process, if and when necessary. The form should
be filled out by the Staff/Pastor- Parish Relations Committee annually.
District *
Lake North
Church *
Mount Prospect: Trinity - 1049
Name of person submitting report
Email of person submitting report
,Wendy Hardin Hermann
p torwendy@trinitymp.org
-Current church membership
Average worship attendance
7525
Sunday school membership
Sunday school average attendance
D .. µ
Worship Service times and styles
Brief history of congregation
Nov. 24,,1957: First organizing meeting with MP residents and the
10:30 Blended Worship
D.S.
Palm Sunday, 1958: First worship service
May 18,1958: Church was chartered it members, Donald
Thomas appointed pastor
July 29, 1958: property at 605 West Golf Road purchased --the first parsonage was on this property
May 15,1960 Cornerstone laid for original sanctuary
Sept 11 1960 First church service in the new building
May 1972 Consecration of current sanctuary
Education Wing was completed in 1963, and the Nursery Wing was completed in 2002
Trinity has a long history of missions, housing Journeys (PADS) clients, supporting local missions, relating to global missionaries, and
more recently building relationships with Community Consolidated District 59.
Trinity became a Reconciling Congregation in February 2020.
A church -wide visioning process has occurred over the past few years, now coming to fruition
The brief-history-of-congregation-1 78 field is required.
Description of the congregation. (What brings it alive? Goals? How does the congregation feel about itself?)
Our commitment to missions and hands-on service bring us alive. Music Ministry is widely participatory and involves a wide variety of
types of music and skill levels. We care about one another deeply through prayer and tangible connection. Worship brings us together as
a community. We are inspired to build relationships in the wider community, as we seek to live into the work of our visioning team.
The description-of-the-congregation-what-brings-it-aii-1 79 field is required.
What are your core values as a congregation?
Faith, Compassion, Inclusive, Diversity, Curiosity, Relevant and Practial Faith, Community,
What is the racial / ethnic / cultural diversity of the church and the community (who are your neighbors)? (include positives and
challenges)*
We are still primarily white and Caucasian as a congregation, but have a sigfinicatn presence of Filippino parishioners, some parishioner
of African descent, and some Latinx families/members of famliies. Our surrounding community tends to reflect this, but also has a
significant Spanish speaking population. We are an incredibly economically/racially/ethincally diverse community if you go 1 to 2 miles
radius around the church. Trinity also has several committed Igbtq+ couples who are also leaders, and families with Igtbtq+ members as
well. I
What does the congregation need to accomplish in the next 5 years?
#ut our oning process, we need to:
1. Continue to build upon our growing relationships within our wider community.
OL We need to double our worship attendance in the next ten years.
C,'. We need to find solid financial footing.
J
.. We need to empower and equip leaders and disciples
In what ways do you envision the pastor helping the church reach these goals? *
Through empowering leadership of Trinity members, through casting and clarifying vision for the future, through implementing goals of
Team 2020.
The in-what-ways-do-you-envision-the-pastor-helping-th-597 field is required.
https://registratio-n.umenic.org/profile-of-the-local-church-2022 1/2
To the Village of Mount Prospect as you make decisions on the Trinity property:
have concerns over water drainage on the property at Linneman. I took several photos during the
rainstorms in the spring. Here are photos of my backyard at 690 W. Bel Aire Lane on the northeast corner
of Linneman and Bel Aire Lane.
This is the view of my backyard with standing water:
So much water runs across the back of the yard that it runs across the sidewalk and pools along the
slope of the sidewalk:
Looking from the Trinity property into my yard, you can seethe flow of water across the empty lot:
And pools and flows at the back of my property:
Thanks,
Jill Kaplan -Address: 690 W. Bel Aire Lane
1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CASE NO. PZ-15-25 Hearing Date: December 11, 2025
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 605W. Golf Road
PETITIONER: Jason Doland, Doland Engineering LLC
PROPERTY OWNER: Trinity United Methodist Church
PUBLICATION DATE: November 26, 2025
REQUEST: Final plat of subdivision; Conditional use for a
preliminary and final planned unit development.
MEMBERS PRESENT: William Beattie
Walter Szymczak
Michael Fricano
Fay Costa
MEMBERS ABSENT: Joseph Donnelly
Ewa Weir
Donald Olsen
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Ann Choi — Development Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Jason Doland — Petitioner
Trinity United Methodist Church — PropertyOwner
Jill Kaplan — Resident and Neighbor
Vice Chairman Beattie called the meeting to order at 7:04 PM. Commissioner Szymczak
made a motion seconded by Commissioner Costa to approve the minutes from the
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on November 13, 2025. The minutes were
approved 4-0.
Vice Chairman Beattie introduced case number PZ-15-25, a request for conditional use
approval fora preliminary and final planned unit development and afinal plat of
subdivision for Trinity United Methodist Church.
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
0)
Staff Presentation
Ms. Choi stated that the petition before the Planning and Zoning Commission was for
approval of a preliminary and final Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a final plat of
subdivision for the Trinity Church Resubdivision at 605 W. Golf Road. The petitioner is
Jason Doland of Doland Engineering, LLC, on behalf of the property owner, Trinity United
Methodist Church. The proposal would subdivide the property into six lots, including four
single-family residential lots (Lots 1 through 4), one church lot (Lot 5), and one outlot
(Outlot A) dedicated to stormwater detention and volume control. Ms. Choi reviewed the
proposed site layout, access, parking for the church, and the role of Outlot A in managing
stormwater for both the residential lots and the church property.
Ms. Choi explained that the PUD establishes bulk regulations, subdivision standards, and
architectural diversity requirements to prevent repetitive building patterns within the
subdivision. Ms. Choi summarized the architectural diversity standards and noted that
staff reviewed the request for compliance with the conditional use and PUD standards and
found them to be met. Ms. Choi stated that staff recommends approval of the final plat of
subdivision and final PUD, subject to conditions related to homeowners' association
documentation, removal of existing accessory structures, architectural diversity
compliance, and aesthetic screening of stormwater infrastructure, and recommended that
the Planning and Zoning Commission adopt staff's findings and forward a
recommendation of approval to the Village Board, which would have final authority.
Ms. Choi stated that staff finds that the standards for a conditional use and planned unit
development have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's and staff's responses to the
standards. Based on these findings, Ms. Choi recommended that the Planning and Zoning
Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and
Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motions:
1. A final plat of subdivision titled "Trinity Church Resubdivision" prepared by Doland
Engineering, LLC, and bearing the latest revision date of September 9, 2025,
attached as Exhibit B in the staff report;
2. A conditional use for a final Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of six R-1
zoned lots including four lots (Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4) that are intended for the
development of four separate single-family detached residential homes, one lot
(Lot 5) that will remain as the church lot, and one lot (OutLot A) that is a separate lot
designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1, 21 3 and 4 and
for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to the following
conditions:
a. Prior to obtaining the first temporary certificate of occupancy for Lots 1
through 4, the Petitioner shall submit homeowners' association documents
for staff review and approval. The document shall address long-term site
maintenance, including the maintenance of "Outlot A".
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
V
b. No sale of any parcel of land shall be consummated until the final
subdivision plat has been approved by the Village Board.
c. Any existing accessory structures located on Lots 1 through 4, including but
not limited to the parking lot, playground equipment, light poles, and traffic
signs, shall be removed in their entirety prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the first home, but need not be removed prior to recording of the
final plat.
d. Architectural Diversity: To promote architectural diversity and avoid
repetitive building patterns, no single-family dwelling constructed within the
Trinity Church Resubdivision (Lots 1 through 4) shall be similar in
appearance to any single-family dwelling located on the same street within a
distance of two (2) lots in either direction of the subject lot.
i. Definition of "Similar in Appearance": For purposes of this
subsection, two dwellings shall be considered similar in appearance
if they are identical or nearly identical with respect to any three (3) or
more of the following architectural characteristics:
1. Primary roof form, including the dominant roof type (gable, hip,
mansard, gambrel, flat, or combination):
2. Roof height, measured from finished grade to the peak, within
a tolerance of +/- 2 feet;
3. Front -facing massing, defined as the approximate height and
width of the primary front wall plane closest to the front lot
Line;
4. Overall front -elevation form, including the predominant
silhouette and massing as viewed from the street;
5. Fenestration pattern, including the relative location,
arrangement, and size of windows on the front elevation;
6. Garage configuration, including the location, orientation, and
dimensions of garage doors visible from the street; and
7. Primary exterior siding materials on the front elevation wall
planes (e.g., brick veneer, horizontal siding, board -and -batten,
shakes, or similar materials).
ii. Characteristics Not Constituting Dissimilarity: The following
characteristics, standing alone, shall not be deemed sufficient to
establish dissimilarity between dwellings:
1. Variations in color;
2. Variations in roofing material;
3. Addition or deletion of minor decorative elements (including,
but not limited to, dormers, cupolas, bay windows, belt
courses, fan lights, chimneys, or ornamental features);
4. Reversal of plan orientation (right-hand/left-hand orientation);
5. Variation in window styles; and
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
4
6. Variations in height, width, or length measurements of less
than five percent (5%). unless otherwise specified herein.
iii. Submission and Approval Requirements: Prior to issuance of any
building permit within the subdivision, the applicant shall submit:
1. A proposed set of building elevations for all planned home
models; and
2. A streetscape diagram or lot assignment plan demonstrating
compliance with the spacing requirement established in this
subsection.
The Director of Community Development shall review the submitted
elevations and lot assignments for compliance with the requirements
of this subsection. Approved elevations and lot assignments shall be
binding upon subsequent building permit reviews.
e. All visible structures within the front yards of Lots 1 through 4 associated
with the underground stormwater management system shall be screened
and aesthetically enhanced, subject to the review and approval of the
Community Development Director. Required improvements may include,
but are not limited to, decorative surface treatments (such as stamped or
stained concrete), landscape screening with shrubs and/or ornamental
grasses, or other beautification measures deemed acceptable by the
Community Development Director."
Discussion
Vice Chairman Beattie noted that approval of the request would result in the church having
a single point of ingress and egress and questioned whether this access would be
sufficient to accommodate traffic on the church's busiest days. Ms. Choi responded that
the proposal was reviewed by the public works department and fire department and no
traffic concerns were raised given the attendance numbers for the church.
Vice Chairman Beattie asked whether the variations required for Outlot A would be
addressed through the planned unit development. Ms. Choi responded that the planned
unit development would provide relief for all deviations required for OutlotA, and that Lots
1 through 5 all comply with code.
Vice Chairman Beattie expressed surprise at the architectural diversity standards, noting
that he had not previously encountered them during his service on the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Ms. Choi responded that the standards are identified as a goal in the
Village's Strategic Plan and that the Commission should expect to see proposed text
amendments early next year that would incorporate similar requirements. Vice Chairman
Beattie then asked whether the standards could pose a challenge for the sale of the lots,
noting that the burden would fall on the seller to identify a developer willing to accept the
restrictions. This question was deferred to the petitioner.
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
Commissioner Costa asked whether the preschool associated with the church was still in
operation. A church member in the audience responded that the preschool is no longer
operating.
Hearing no further comments, Vice Chairman Beattie swore in the following speakers:
• Petitioner, Jason Doland, Doland Engineering LLC, 3939 N Wilke Rd, Arlington
Heights, IL.
• Resident and neighbor, Jill Kaplan, 690 W Bel Aire Ln, Mount Prospect, IL.
• Resident and neighbor, Jason Fumo, 645 W Bel Aire Ln, Mount Prospect, IL.
Mr. Doland presented a few highlights of the proposal:
• The proposed single-family lots would exceed the minimum lot area and lot width
requirements of the R-1 zoning district and would be comparable and compatible
with the surrounding neighborhood;
• The new development would be a good neighbor by introducing new stormwater
collection points along the southeast and southwest corners of Lot 4, thereby
preventing runoff from the new development from discharging onto existing
residential properties to the south.
Vice Chairman Beattie asked the Petitioner about the screening of structures in the front
yard. Mr. Doland clarified that "structures" referred to the underground manholes with a
Large manhole lid associated with the stormwater management system. Mr. Doland stated
that the developer could "soften" these by using landscaping.
Vice Chairman Beattie asked whether the architectural diversity standards would create
an additional burden for the developer or the church. Mr. Doland responded that the
standards would impose a burden; however, Mr. Doland acknowledged that similar
requirements are anticipated in the near future as text amendments and stated that he
understood they were being applied in this case because the zoning request would be
approved prior to the adoption of the forthcoming text amendments. Mr. Doland
acknowledged that the proposal represented a reasonable compromise with staff,
allowing the subdivision to proceed with an unbuildable lot in exchange for incorporating
architectural diversity requirements.
Commissioner Costa reiterated that the stormwater storage would be underground and
asked what material would be on the surface. Mr. Doland responded that the surface
would be composed of grass/turf lawn and that residents would be unaware of what would
be under the surface. Commissioner Costa asked if the developer would pull a permit with
the MWRD under the stormwater management ordinance. Mr. Doland responded that this
subdivision is not subject to MWRD since the development is below the threshold but that
the development would follow the same standards of the Village's codes. Vice Chairman
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
6
Beattie commented that Outlot A would appear to read visually as an extension of the rear
yards of the proposed residential lots rather than as a traditional depressed basin.
Commissioner Fricano asked whether the proposed stormwater management system
would help alleviate existing stormwater issues for the homes located south of Lot 4. Mr.
Doland responded that it would, explaining that the proposed storm sewer collection
points would be located below the shared lot line and would capture runoff along that
boundary rather than allowing it to discharge onto adjacent properties. Mr. Doland further
noted that, under existing conditions, stormwater tends to stagnate along the lot line, and
that this condition would be improved with the installation of the proposed swale and
collection system. Mr. Doland stated that the new development would not add burdens to
the existing homes.
Vice Chairman Beattie invited additional speakers to come to the podium. Ms. Kaplan
stated that she resides directly south of Lot 4 and presented photographs showing
standing water in her backyard following rain events, reiterating that stormwater issues
exist on her property. Ms. Kaplan also noted that residents currently use the driveway asa
pedestrian route to access the church and asked whether a sidewalk would be provided to
maintain that connection. Additionally, she inquired whether a sidewalk could be installed
along the west side ofLinneman Road, noting that a sidewalk currently exists only on the
east side. Ms. Kaplan also noted that there is a healthy tree that is located at the back end
of the proposed Lot 4 and if the tree would be removed as part of the development.
Vice Chairman Beattie invited Mr. Fumo to speak. Mr. Fumo inquired whether the church
intended to sell all four lots to a single developer or sell them individually, and expressed
concern that a developer could potentially acquire all four lots and seek zoning relief to
construct a higher -intensity, multi -family development. Vice Chairman Beattie responded
that such a scenario would be difficult, as the planned unit development only permits
single-family residential lots, and noted that single-family development is compatible with
the surrounding neighborhood.
Vice Chairman Beattie invited Mr. Doland to respond to the stormwater-related questions.
Mr. Doland stated that the proposed development would not shed stormwater off -site and
explained that existing pooling occurs within the area of proposed Lot 4, where two new
storm inlets would be installed. Ms. Kaplan indicated that her concerns involved both
proposed Lot 4 and her property. Mr. Doland responded that while he could not address
drainage conditions on private property, stormwater collected on Lot 4 would not impact
adjacent yards, noting that the collection points would be approximately one foot lower
than the surrounding areas to facilitate drainage and prevent water stagnation.
Vice Chairman Beattie requested a response to the second question regarding whether a
sidewalk would be provided to preserve a pedestrian connection between the
neighborhood and the church. Mr. Doland responded that no direct connection would be
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
7
provided, as the proposed side yards would abut one another; however, he noted that
pedestrians could access the church via existing sidewalks on the east side of Linneman
Road and along Golf Road.
Vice Chairman Beattie requested a response to the third question regarding whether the
seller could prevent the removal of a healthy tree located at the rear of proposed Lot 4. Mr.
Doland responded that, due to the tree's location along the rear of Lots 3 and 4, a future
homeowner could potentially work with the builder to preserve the tree as an amenity;
however, the church could not guarantee its preservation.
Vice Chairman Beattie requested a response to the fourth question regarding whether the
church intended to sell the four lots to a single developer or sell them individually. Mr.
Doland stated that the church's preference would be to sell all four lots to a single
developer. Mr. Doland noted that if the lots were sold individually, a homeowners
association would still be required to provide perpetual maintenance of the detention
facilities and ensure compliance with the Village's anti -monotony requirements, and that
some level of development control would be maintained regardless of whether there was
one developer or multiple developers.
Vice Chairman Beattie asked if there were any further questions for staff. Commissioner
Fricano inquired whether the Village requires tree replacement if a tree is removed. Ms.
Choi responded that replacement is not required unless the tree is designated for
preservation. Vice Chairman Beattie noted that, based on prior residential developments,
he was not aware of any requirements to retain site or perimeter trees and asked whether
staff had considered such requirements for this project. Ms. Choi responded that staff did
not propose imposing those requirements.
Hearing no further comments or questions, Vice Chairman Beattie closed the hearing and
asked fora motion. Commissioner Szymczak made a motion and Commissioner Costa
seconded the motion to approve the requests as listed in the staff report and repeated
here:
1. A final plat of subdivision titled "Trinity Church Resubdivision" prepared by Doland
Engineering, LLC, and bearing the latest revision date of September 9, 2025,
attached as Exhibit B in the staff report;
2. A conditional use for a final Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of six R-1
zoned lots including four lots (Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4) that are intended for the
development of four separate single-family detached residential homes, one lot
(Lot 5) that will remain as the church lot, and one lot (OutLot A) that is a separate lot
designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 and
for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to the following
conditions:
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
8
a. Prior to obtaining the first temporary certificate of occupancy for Lots 1
through 4, the Petitioner shall submit homeowners' association documents
for staff review and approval. The document shall address long-term site
maintenance, including the maintenance of "Outlot A".
b. No sale of any parcel of land shall be consummated until the final
subdivision plat has been approved by the Village Board.
c. Any existing accessory structures located on Lots 1 through 4, including but
not limited to the parking lot, playground equipment, light poles, and traffic
signs, shall be removed in their entirety prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the first home, but need not be removed prior to recording of the
final plat.
d. Architectural Diversity: To promote architectural diversity and avoid
repetitive building patterns, no single-family dwelling constructed within the
Trinity Church Resubdivision (Lots 1 through 4) shall be similar in
appearance to any single-family dwelling located on the same street within a
distance of two (2) lots in either direction of the subject lot.
i. Definition of "Similar in Appearance": For purposes of this
subsection, two dwellings shall be considered similar in appearance
if they are identical or nearly identical with respect to any three (3) or
more of the following architectural characteristics:
1. Primary roof form, including the dominant roof type (gable, hip,
mansard, gambrel, flat, or combination):
2. Roof height, measured from finished grade to the peak, within
a tolerance of +/- 2 feet;
3. Front -facing massing, defined as the approximate height and
width of the primary front wall plane closest to the front lot
Line;
4. Overall front -elevation form, including the predominant
silhouette and massing as viewed from the street;
5. Fenestration pattern, including the relative location,
arrangement, and size of windows on the front elevation;
6. Garage configuration, including the location, orientation, and
dimensions of garage doors visible from the street; and
7. Primary exterior siding materials on the front elevation wall
planes (e.g., brick veneer, horizontal siding, board -and -batten,
shakes, or similar materials).
ii. Characteristics Not Constituting Dissimilarity: The following
characteristics, standing alone, shall not be deemed sufficient to
establish dissimilarity between dwellings:
1. Variations in color;
2. Variations in roofing material;
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
3. Addition or deletion of minor decorative elements (including,
but not limited to, dormers, cupolas, bay windows, belt
courses, fan lights, chimneys, or ornamental features);
4. Reversal of plan orientation (right-hand/left-hand orientation);
5. Variation in window styles; and
6. Variations in height, width, or length measurements of less
than five percent (5%), unless otherwise specified herein.
iii. Submission and Approval Requirements: Prior to issuance of any
building permit within the subdivision, the applicant shall submit:
1. A proposed set of building elevations for all planned home
models; and
2. A streetscape diagram or lot assignment plan demonstrating
compliance with the spacing requirement established in this
subsection.
The Director of Community Development shall review the submitted
elevations and lot assignments for compliance with the requirements
of this subsection. Approved elevations and lot assignments shall be
binding upon subsequent building permit reviews.
e. All visible structures within the front yards of Lots 1 through 4 associated
with the underground stormwater management system shall be screened
and aesthetically enhanced, subject to the review and approval of the
Community Development Director. Required improvements may include,
but are not limited to, decorative surface treatments (such as stamped or
stained concrete), landscape screening with shrubs and/or ornamental
grasses, or other beautification measures deemed acceptable by the
Community Development Director."
UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Beattie, Fricano, Costa,
NAYS: None
The Planning and Zoning Commission gave a positive recommendation (4-0) for the next
Village Board meeting to be held on January 6, 2026 and January 20, 2026.
After hearing no additional items of new business, Vice Chairman Beattie asked if there
were any citizens to be heard.
Hearing no further discussion, Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion, seconded by
Commissioner Szymczak, and the meeting was adjourned at7:49 PM.
AAI
Ann Choi, Development Planner
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — December 11, 2025 PZ-15-25
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION AND A
CONDITIONAL USE FOR A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
605 WEST GOLF ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, Jason Doland of Doland Engineering, LLC ("Petitioner") has filed a
petition for a final plat of subdivision and a conditional use for a preliminary
and final Planned Unit Development, with respect to property located at 605
West Golf Road ("Subject Property") and legally described as follows:
LOT A IN TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH SUBDIVISION, BEING A
SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF THE EAST 7.38 CHAINS OF THE WEST HALF
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH,
RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH OF THE
ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SEEGERS ROAD (EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF
LYING NORTH OF THE PRESENT SOUTH LINE OF GOLF ROAD AND EXCEPT
THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF
INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF CHURCH ROAD 2.34 CHAINS; THENCE
EAST 2.64 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 3.10 CHAINS TO THE CENTERLINE OF
SEEGERS ROAD; THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID
ROAD 2.78 CHAINS TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AS MEASURED ON THE
EAST AND WEST LINES THEREOF, THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST
QUARTER) CONTAINING 4.50 ACRES MORE OR LESS, ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 12, 1971 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 21477051,
IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a final plat of subdivision to subdivide a single
R-1 zoned lot into six (6) R-1 zoned lots of record totaling approximately 4.43
acres; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a conditional use permit for a preliminary and
final Planned Unit Development consisting of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 (development
of future single-family residential homes), Lot 5 (church lot), and "Outlot A" (a
separate lot designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots
1 through 5); and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the requests being the subject of PZ-
15-25 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 11 th day of December, 2025, pursuant to proper legal notice
having been published in the Daily Herald newspaper on the 26th day of
November, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings
and recommendations of approval, with specific conditions, to the Mayor and
Board of Trustees in support of the requests being the subject of PZ-15-25; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have given consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the
requests meet the standards of the Village and that the granting of the
proposed final plat of subdivision and the conditional use for a preliminary and
final Planned Unit Development would be in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein
as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby approve a final plat of subdivision titled "Trinity Church
Resubdivision" attached as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THREE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby approve a conditional use for a preliminary and final
Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of six (6) R-1 zoned lots including
four lots (Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4) that are intended for the development of four
separate single-family detached residential homes, one lot (Lot 5) that will
remain as the church lot, and one lot (OutLotA) that is a separate lot designated
for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 and for
accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to the
following conditions:
1. General conformance with the approved engineering plan set (11
sheets) titled "Engineering Plan for Trinity United Methodist Church"
prepared by Doland Engineering, LLC and bearing the latest revision
date of November 19, 2025;
2. Prior to obtaining the first temporary certificate of occupancy for Lots
1 through 4, the Petitioner shall submit homeowners' association
documents for staff review and approval. The document shall address
long-term site maintenance, including the maintenance of "OutlotA".
3. No sale of any parcel of land shall be consummated until the final
subdivision plat has been approved by the Village Board.
4. Any existing accessory structures located on Lots 1 through 4,
including but not limited to the parking lot, playground equipment,
Light poles, and traffic signs, shall be removed in their entirety prior to
the issuance of a building permit for the first home, but need not be
removed prior to recording of the final plat.
5. Architectural Diversity: To promote architectural diversity and avoid
repetitive building patterns, no single-family dwelling constructed
within the Trinity Church Resubdivision (Lots 1 through 4) shall be
similar in appearance to any single-family dwelling located on the
same street within a distance of two (2) lots in either direction of the
subject lot.
a. Definition of "Similar in Appearance": For purposes of this
subsection, two dwellings shall be considered similar in
appearance if they are identical or nearly identical with
respect to anythree (3) or more of the following architectural
characteristics:
i. Primary roof form, including the dominant roof type
(gable, hip, mansard, gambrel, flat, or combination):
ii. Roof height, measured from finished grade to the
peak, within a tolerance of +/- 2 feet;
iii. Front -facing massing, defined as the approximate
height and width of the primary front wall plane closest
to the front lot line;
iv. Overall front -elevation form, including the
predominant silhouette and massing as viewed from
the street;
v. Fenestration pattern, including the relative location,
arrangement, and size of windows on the front
elevation;
vi. Garage configuration, including the location,
orientation, and dimensions of garage doors visible
from the street; and
vii. Primary exterior siding materials on the front elevation
wall planes (e.g., brick veneer, horizontal siding,
board -and -batten, shakes, or similar materials).
b. Characteristics Not Constituting Dissimilarity: The following
characteristics, standing alone, shall not be deemed
sufficient to establish dissimilarity between dwellings:
i. Variations in color;
ii. Variations in roofing material;
iii. Addition or deletion of minor decorative elements
(including, but not limited to, dormers, cupolas, bay
windows, belt courses, fan lights, chimneys, or
ornamental features);
iv. Reversal of plan orientation (right-hand/left-hand
orientation);
v. Variation in window styles; and
vi. Variations in height, width, or length measurements of
less than five percent (5%), unless otherwise specified
herein.
c. Submission and Approval Requirements: Prior to issuance of
any building permit within the subdivision, the applicant
shall submit:
i. A proposed set of building elevations for all planned
home models; and
ii. A streetscape diagram or lot assignment plan
demonstrating compliance with the spacing
requirement established in this subsection.
The Director of Community Development shall review the
submitted elevations and lot assignments for compliance
with the requirements of this subsection. Approved
elevations and lot assignments shall be binding upon
subsequent building permit reviews.
6. All visible structures within the front yards of Lots 1 through 4
associated with the underground stormwater management system
shall be screened and aesthetically enhanced, subject to the review
and approval of the Community Development Director. Required
improvements may include, but are not limited to, decorative surface
treatments (such as stamped or stained concrete), landscape
screening with shrubs and/or ornamental grasses, or other
beautification measures deemed acceptable by the Community
Development Director.
SECTION FOUR: Except forthe relief granted bythe planned unit development,
compliance with all applicable development, fire, building, and other Village
Codes and regulations is required.
SECTION FIVE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance and Exhibit "A" with the Recorder of Deeds of
Cook County.
SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by
law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this6th day of January, 2026.
Paul Wm. Hoefert, Mayor
ATTEST:
Karen M. Agoranos, Village Clerk
-- - - - --------
13W 2�
W ML-
-CT T,
M. N 1-0PUCL A FA� IH
oq Ft, i�� xS5.
wo-N Ic sw� -?afmn, W�l u "wa-im 3- -F nFlA�-.1NI
MLLAGE CMLLCTOR CEIMMATE
a Sao
R
Vli� Y L�Nclf
PU �.R LE, V-- L �Ll 9 MA V, I —IL A LN I
_U $'W 0� 1NE ll--LaD I lZK -Lb`
DFLAWAGE CERTIRCAR
C L.
A M-
VIE ENGMER CERTIFICA�
�N
wrms W Z �A. YZW WH7� 7-F ---CC- "AF W"r 7� UFF,
X,�� TW St-,, F��I- F
Z i—b Ft'A-Kj,;K !,Ou
WT 2
W-441
cmt� �wx
��Mv
cwj F MUS-Z—A -Rn��F-
W4 j��:N x DAMD
�F� Mkt� MaTViiI.,
_7 ALM twir—ss-
LOT
A HS L)p 20 ---
------------------------------------------
Lar 3
rWNER
WLT� R.A� ARff
NO n;
. # -x--. ,,D olf-It PI -Wu
Minn—
�A
L OT 4
147
Rev. SEPTEMPER 9, 2025
JULY 9, 2025
DOLAND ENGIN ERING, LL,—'
i-KI-MUK-NG - ANK KMANIM-
Z.l 0)'" 'FRI"T
60,16,
rl
=r
0
=r
W C/)
N cr
r. CL
CY �s
CL <0
0
0