Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/11/2025 P&Z Agenda PacketVillage of Mount Prospect Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda 50 S. Emerson St. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 December 11, 2025 Village Hall - 3rd Floor Board Room 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. PZ-26-25 / 17 S Maple Street / CU: Setback Reduction, VARs: Increases to Accessory Structure Size and Height, Lot Coverage, Accessory Structure in Easement 2.2. PZ-20-25 / 810 South I Oka Avenue / CU: Setback Reduction 2.3. PZ-23-25 / 1699 Wall St 550-Q / CU: Massage Therapy 2.4. PZ-25-25 / 1728 E Kensington Rd / CU: Massage Therapy 3. NEW BUSINESS 3.1. PZ-15-25 / 605 W. Golf Road /Final Plat of Subdivision and CU: Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development /Village Board Final 4. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD 5. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS 6. ADJOURNMENT ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 8471392-6000, EXTENSION 5307 Page 1 of 66 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-26-25 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: Hearing Date: November 13, 2025 17 S. Maple Street Mitch Kenoe October 29, 2025 REQUEST: Conditional use to reduce the minimum rear yard setback and variations to permit an increase to the maximum accessory structure height, maximum accessory structure size, maximum lot coverage, and to allow an accessory structure to be located within an easement. MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Donnelly William Beattie Walter Szym cza k Richard Rogers Fay Costa MEMBERS ABSENT: Ewa Weir Donald Olsen Michael Fricano STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Charles Hogan - Development Planner Jason Shallcross - Director of Community & Economic Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Mitch Kenoe, Petitioner/Property Owner Tom Karlov, Resident and Neighbor Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM. Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on October 23, 2025. The minutes were approved 4-0 (Commissioner Costa arrived after the approval of the meeting minutes). Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 2 of 66 Chairman Donnelly introduced case numberPZ-26-25, 17S. Maple Street, a request for conditional use approval to reduce the rear yard setback and variations to allow increases to accessory structure height, size, and lot coverage, as well as a variation to permit an accessory structure to be located within an easement. Director Shallcross presented the existing nonconforming shed (constructed by a previous homeowner) at the rear of the property and the requested zoning relief for the conversion of an existing shed into an art studio with a porch addition, including: • Avariation from Section 14.306(A)(3)(a) to permit an increase to the maximum height requirement of an accessory structure in a residential district from 10 feet to 10.67 feet. (+6.7% PZ Final) • A variation from Section 14.306(B)(1)(b) to permit an increase to the maximum size requirement of an accessory structure from 157 square feet to 323 square feet. (+205.7% VB Final) • A variation from Section 14.306(B)(2)(c) to permit an accessory structure to be constructed within an easement in perpetuity. (VB Final) • Avariation from Section 14.1005(C)(1) to permit an increase to the maximum lot coverage requirement from 50% to 56.2%. (+12.3% PZ Final) • A conditional use permit to reduce the minimum rear yard setback for accessory structures from 3 feet (T-O") to 2 inches (0'-2") for the construction of an accessory structure. (-94.4% VB Final) Director Shallcross presented a slide providing compliance with the bulk regulations of the R-a district. out that the existing lot coverage already exceeds what is permitted. Director Shallcross noted that staff reviewed ADA Title II considerations and acknowledged the medical documentation submitted showing the therapeutic benefit of the structure for the petitioner's daughter. Director Shallcross clarified that while the interior conversion of the shed could be permitted as a reasonable accommodation, the porch addition requires zoning approval because it is considered new construction. A condition of the permit required that the shed would need to de -convert the shed into an art studio or completely demolish the shed. Director Shallcross further explained that no letters of objection were received from applicable utility companies regarding the structure's location beneath overhead utility Lines, provided that no further expansion occurs. Director Shallcross concluded his presentation with staff's recommendation approving of the conditional use and variations as a reasonable accommodation but did not support allowing the structure to remain beyond the sale of the home. Recommended conditions included: Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 3 of 66 Director Shallcross concluded that staff finds that the proposed conditional use and variations satisfy the criteria for a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act but did not support allowing the structure to remain beyond the sale of the home. Director Shallcross requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission make motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: "Motion to: 1. Approve a variation from Section 14.306(A)(3)(a) to permit an increase to the maximum height requirement of an accessory structure in a residential district from 10 feet to 10.67 feet. 2. Approve a variation from Section 14.1005(C)(1) to permit an increase to the maximum lot coverage requirement from 50% to 56.2%, subject to the following condition: a. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a French drain, or other acceptable means of providing the required storage/infiltration for the area exceeding allowable lot coverage, shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer. 3. Recommend approval of a conditional use to reduce the minimum rear side yard setback applicable to accessory structures from three feet (3'-0") to zero feet two inches (0'-2") for the construction of an accessory structure at 17 S Maple Street, Case No. PZ-26-25, subject to the following conditions: a. The conditional use for the reduced rear yard setback for accessory structures shall apply to the art/play studio including the porch/patio addition only and shall not apply to any other principal or accessory structure; b. The improvements shall be in strict conformance with the plat of survey attached as Exhibit B of the staff report; c. The art/play studio shall be used only for personal, non-commercial purposes consistent with the Make -A -Wish Foundation request and satisfy Village Home Occupation regulations; and d. The art/play studio including the porch/patio addition shall be restored to its original nonconforming shed use or shall be demolished in its entirety prior to the Village's issuance of a transfer stamp for any future sale or conveyance of the property. 4. Recommend approval of a variation from Section 14.306(B)(1)(b) to permit an increase to the maximum size requirement of an accessory structure from 157 square feet to 323 SF. 5. Recommend approval of a variation from Section 14.306(B)(2)(c) to permit an accessory structure to be constructed within an easement, subject to the following condition: a. The Petitioner shall obtain written approval from all applicable utility providers authorizing the art/play studio including the porch/patio addition to Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 4 of 66 4 remain in its proposed location and shall comply with any conditions or requirements imposed by the utility companies. 6. Recommend approval of a statement to the Village Board that, recognizing that certain zoning requests in the application are Planning and Zoning Commission final and others merely recommendations, the Village Board review the application as a whole, feeling free to modify or rescind any aspects of the application that are Planning and Zoning Commission final where it deems it in the best interest of the Village." Director Shallcross highlighted the inclusion of the sixth condition that would allow the Village Board to modify or rescind any of the zoning requests that were already approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Director Shallcross stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision on the request for increased accessory structure size and lot coverage, and the Village Board's decision is final for the remaining requests. Chairman Donnelly asked what would happen if the Planning and Zoning Commission would deny the requests under the authority of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Director Shallcross stated that all zoning requests that are Planning and Zoning Commission final, if denied by the Commission, would be appealable to the Village Board, and an appeal would need to be filed within five days of the denial. Director Shallcross also reviewed the conditions of approval: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a French drain, or other acceptable means of providing the required storage/infiltration for the area exceeding allowable Lot coverage, shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer. 2. The conditional use for the reduced rear yard setback for accessory structures shall apply to the art/play studio including the porch/patio addition only and shall not apply to any other principal or accessory structure; 3. The improvements shall be in strict conformance with the plat of survey attached as Exhibit B of the staff report; 4. The art/play studio shall be used only for personal, non-commercial purposes consistent with the Make -A -Wish Foundation request and satisfy Village Home Occupation regulations; and 5. The art/play studio, including the porch/patio addition shall be restored to its original nonconforming shed use or shall be demolished in its entirety prior to the Village's issuance of a transfer stamp for any future sale or conveyance of the property. 6. The Petitioner shall obtain written approval from all applicable utility providers authorizing the art/play studio including the porch/patio addition to remain in its proposed location and shall comply with any conditions or requirements imposed by the utility companies. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 5 of 66 Chairman Donnelly stated that the shed was constructed without a permit, and the lot coverage was not checked when the shed was built. Director Shallcross confirmed that the shed is an illegal nonconforming structure. Vice Chairman Beattie expressed confusion how the zoning requests were related to the disability of the petitioner's daughter. Director Shallcross stated that the Petitioner provided a letter from a medical professional overseeing the treatment of the Petitioner's daughter documenting the disability and the use of the shed as beneficial for therapeutic purposes. Hearing no further comments, Chairman Donnelly closed the public hearing and swore in the petitioner, Mitch Kenoe, 17 S. Maple Street. Mr. Kenoe described the project as part of a Make -A -Wish Foundation experience for his daughter, who suffers from chronic medical conditions including Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and a brain anomaly requiring ongoing therapies. Mr. Kenoe stated that the art/play studio provides a therapeutic, calming environment that helps her decompress after treatments. Mr. Kenoe explained that the Make -A -Wish funding has already been used for wiring, insulation, and interior improvements, making reconstruction infeasible. Mr. Kenoe stated that he is willing to install the French drain and comply with all required conditions. Mr. Kenoe requested consideration for allowing the structure to remain beyond the sale of the home, noting the structure's compatibility with the neighborhood. Vice Chairman Beattie asked the Petitioner what the connection between the Petitioner's daughter's medical conditions and the improvements being requested. Mr. Kenoe explained that the accommodation is intended to address his daughter's significant emotional and psychological trauma related to her medical care. Mr. Kenoe noted that although his daughter currently has no physical limitations due to ongoing treatment, she has experienced severe medical events, including two anaphylactic reactions in the past year, and continues to undergo frequent medical interventions. The proposed improvements are intended to provide a safe, calming space to help manage her anxiety associated with these ongoing medical needs. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner to clarify why the existing non -permitted shed must remain to accommodate his daughter's needs, and he questioned what alternatives were considered to provide a code -compliant space within the backyard and why those options were not pursued instead of relying on a structure that does not meet Village requirements. Chairman Donnelly asked if the Make -A -Wish foundation provide the money to provide a shed, a legal shed, on the property for her. Mr. Kenoe responded that no alternative structure was pursued because the family has already invested their available funds into the temporary conversion of the existing shed, as previously described by Director Shallcross. Mr. Kenoe explained that the only remaining grant funds are Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 6 of 66 6 designated specifically for the hardscape patio shown in the renderings, which would provide accessible connection to the structure. Chairman Donnelly asked Mr. Kenoe whether a building permit had been obtained prior to undertaking the temporary conversion of the shed. Mr. Kenoe confirmed that the permit for the temporary work was secured with the Village before the conversion was completed. Commissioner Rogers asked whether the structure was constructed on a slab -on -grade foundation and if the Petitioner was aware that, should utility work be required in the area, the entire structure might need to be removed. Mr. Kenoe confirmed that he is aware of the potential risk associated with the structure's location beneath the utility lines and stated that he had spoken with all three utility providers, who indicated they had no objections given the circumstances. Chairman Donnelly also noted that it was noted in the staff report that the Petitioner is aware and there are letters from the utility companies stating that they do not have any concerns with the structure there. Chairman Donnelly noted additional concerns regarding the property's lot coverage and potential drainage impacts. Chairman Donnelly explained that the concrete structure is Located within an area where several properties drain toward the rear yards. Chairman Donnelly stated that this presents a technical concern for the Commission's consideration. Vice Chairman Beattie asked the Petitioner if the porch addition was a necessity or if the shed conversion would be sufficient to fill the therapeutic needs of the Petitioner's daughter. Mr. Kenoe replied that the removal of the porch addition could be a consideration and concession that could be made. Chairman Donnelly noted that while staff's recommendation already includes a condition requiring the removal or restoration of the structure prior to the sale of the property, he would be supportive of a condition clarifying that the structure must be demolished to bring the lot back into conformance. Chairman Donnelly stated that this approach would allow the petitioner to maintain use of the art/play studio during their occupancy but would require its removal once the property is sold, ensuring the site ultimately complies with zoning regulations related to lot coverage and drainage. Mr. Kenoe stated that he preferred a condition that would allow the structure to remain on the property in perpetuity, provided its use remained non -habitable. He emphasized that the shed pre -dated his ownership by decades and that its improvement into an art/play studio has enhanced the property and surrounding neighborhood. Chairman Donnelly responded that typically, non -permitted accessory structures would be required to be removed to restore compliance but acknowledged the unique accessibility circumstances presented by the petitioner. Vice Chairman Beattie agreed, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 7 of 66 stating that while the request is understandable given the needs of the petitioner's daughter, the relief should remain tied to those needs rather than run with the land. Vice Chairman Beattie noted that the intent of the accommodation is not to increase the property's resale value, but to address an accessibility -related necessity. Mr. Kenoe asked whether the structure could remain and simply be reverted to a shed use upon sale of the property. Vice Chairman Beattie and Chairman Donnelly explained that full removal would likely be necessary to restore compliance with lot coverage and drainage requirements. Mr. Kenoe then asked for clarification that the Commission would consider approval contingent on the removal of the structure upon sale of the home, to which Chairman Donnelly indicated leaning towards that direction. Director Shallcross clarified that staff's recommended condition already specifies that the art/play studio and porch/patio addition must either be restored to its original non- conforming shed use or demolished in its entirety prior to the Village's issuance of a transfer stamp. Director Shallcross advised that, should the Commission wish to modify the condition to require demolition only, that modification should be explicitly included in the motion to approve. Vice Chairman Beattie noted that the petitioner faced a unique situation, having inherited a non -compliant structure not of his own doing. Vice Chairman Beattie suggested that, rather than maintaining a structure that required multiple variances, it might be preferable to construct a compliant alternative elsewhere on the lot. Mr. Kenoe responded that the structure was already fully improved with insulation, drywall, and windows, and that the work was completed through the Make -A -Wish Foundation. Mr. Kenoe stated that numerous options had been considered but this project best met his family's needs given their circumstances and health limitations. Mr. Kenoe added that Make -A -Wish had already funded and completed the work, and that the improvements were completed with the Village's knowledge. Chairman Donnelly invited the public to speak. Tom Karlov, 300 E. Evergreen Avenue, spoke in support of the petition. Mr. Karlov stated that he has known the petitioner's family for approximately five years and noted that both Mr. Kenoe's wife and daughter have serious health conditions. Mr. Karlov explained that the community previously organized fundraisers, including the "June Bug Fund," to assist the family. Mr. Karlov stated that the shed has existed for decades and was improved through the Make -A -Wish Foundation to provide a space where the petitioner's wife and daughter could spend time together. Mr. Karlov described the structure as well-built and compatible with the neighborhood and expressed his full support for allowing it to remain. Mr. Karlov and Chairman Donnelly discussed neighborhood drainage, with Mr. Karlov stating that he was not aware of any current flooding or drainage issues in the area. Mr. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 8 of 66 Karlov emphasized that the shed has existed for decades, is well built, and complements the historic character of the neighborhood. Mr. Karlov expressed his hope that the structure could continue to remain and provide a space for the petitioner's wife and daughter to spend time together. Commissioner Costa inquired about the height of the structure and its proximity to the ComEd utility lines, asking whether the utility's approval was permanent or time limited. Vice Chairman noted that utility representatives had confirmed the structure's placement within the easement and their need for continued access. Director Shallcross added that all utility providers, including ComEd, had approved the plans as submitted specifically prohibiting any future expansion but allowing the existing structure and porch to remain. Hearing no further comments, Chairman Donnelly closed the public hearing. Chairman Donnelly stated that the goal should be to eventually bring the property back into full zoning compliance, noting that while the family may remain in the home for many years, the Village cannot predict how future commissions might view the nonconforming structure. Chairman Donnelly supported allowing continued use during the current ownership but requiring demolition prior to resale to ensure long-term compliance. Director Shallcross confirmed that a future property owner could petition to amend the ordinance and request that the condition be modified or removed at a later date but emphasized that the current approval should require removal prior to issuance ofa transfer stamp. Director Shallcross advised against imposing any fixed time limit, recommending that the transfer -stamp condition remain as the most enforceable mechanism. Chairman Donnelly summarized that the intent is to allow the existing use for the benefit of the current family, while ensuring the property returns to compliance once the home is sold consistent with how the Village has handled past accessibility -related accommodations. Director Shallcross clarified that the current discussion concerned only whether the property must be restored to compliance upon sale, not the separate issue of the porch addition. Director Shallcross explained that the proposed modification would remove the option for the petitioner to restore the structure to a nonconforming shed and instead require full removal prior to the sale of the property. Vice Chairman Beattie confirmed that the intent was to strike the phrase "restored to its original nonconforming shed use" from the staff -recommended condition, thereby requiring demolition of the structure to bring the lot back into compliance. Chairman Donnelly reiterated that the condition would ensure conformance at resale while allowing the family to continue use of the structure during their occupancy. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 9 of 66 Vice Chairman Beattie asked whether a condition should be added to prohibit the structure from being made habitable or equipped with plumbing. Director Shallcross responded that such use is already prohibited by the zoning code and that any conversion to a living space would constitute a violation of other zoning code regulations. The Commission agreed that no additional conditions were necessary. Chairman Donnelly then asked whether there were any concerns regarding the proposed porch addition. Director Shallcross noted that the porch would extend seven feet from the south side of the existing shed, continuing the existing two-inch setback from the rear property line and maintaining the nonconforming condition. A straw vote was taken regarding modification of staff's recommended transfer -stamp condition. By a vote of 3-2, the Planning and Zoning Commission supported requiring complete demolition of the accessory structure upon the future sale of the subject property, removing the option to restore the structure to a storage shed. Chairman Donnelly acknowledged that while the porch and associated coverage increase are not ideal, he supported the modification given the accessibility -related purpose of the request and the condition requiring drainage improvements to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer. Hearing no further comments or questions, Chairman Donnelly closed the hearing and asked fora motion. Commissioner Beattie made motion and Commissioner Szymczak seconded the motion to approve the requests as listed in the staff report, but amending a condition, and summarized here: 1. Approve a variation from Section 14.306(A)(3)(a) to permit an increase to the maximum height requirement of an accessory structure in a residential district from 10 feet to 10.67 feet. 2. Approve a variation from Section 14.1005(C)(1) to permit an increase to the maximum lot coverage requirement from 50% to 56.2%, subject to the following condition: a. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a French drain, or other acceptable means of providing the required storage/infiltration for the area exceeding allowable lot coverage, shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer. 3. Recommend approval of a conditional use to reduce the minimum rear side yard setback applicable to accessory structures from three feet (3'-0") to zero feet two inches (0'-2") for the construction of an accessory structure at 17 S Maple Street, Case No. PZ-26-25, subject to the following conditions: a. The conditional use for the reduced rear yard setback for accessory structures shall apply to the art/play studio including the porch/patio Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 10 of 66 10 addition only and shall not apply to any other principal or accessory structure; b. The improvements shall be in strict conformance with the plat of survey attached as Exhibit B of the staff report; c. The art/play studio shall be used only for personal, non-commercial purposes consistent with the Make -A -Wish Foundation request and satisfy Village Home Occupation regulations; and d. The art/play studio, including the porch/patio addition, shall be demolished in its entirety prior to the Village's issuance of a transfer stamp for any future sale or conveyance of the property. 4. Recommend approval of a variation from Section 14.306(B)(1)(b) to permit an increase to the maximum size requirement of an accessory structure from 157 square feet to 323 SF. 5. Recommend approval of a variation from Section 14.306(B)(2)(c) to permit an accessory structure to be constructed within an easement, subject to the following condition: a. The Petitioner shall obtain written approval from all applicable utility providers authorizing the art/play studio including the porch/patio addition to remain in its proposed location and shall comply with any conditions or requirements imposed by the utility companies. 6. Recommend approval of a statement to the Village Board that, recognizing that certain zoning requests in the application are Planning and Zoning Commission final and others merely recommendations, the Village Board review the application as a whole, feeling free to modify or rescind any aspects of the application that are Planning and Zoning Commission final where it deems it in the best interest of the Village. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Beattie, Costa, Donnelly NAYS: Rogers The Planning and Zoning Commission gave a positive recommendation (4-1) for the next Village Board meeting to be held on December 2, 2025. After hearing three more items of new business, Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens to be heard. Hearing no further discussion, Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Szymczak, and the meeting was adjourned at 8:34 PM. Ann Choi, Development Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-26-25 Page 11 of 66 I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-20-25 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: Hearing Date: November 13, 2025 810S.IOka Ave Tom Sirant October 29, 2025 REQUEST: Conditional use to reduce the minimum interior (north) side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet to accommodate a pergola attached to the single-family residence at 810 S I Oka Avenue. MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Donnelly William Beattie Wa lte r Szym cza k Richard Rogers Fay Costa MEMBERS ABSENT: Ewa Weir Donald Olsen Michael Fricano STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Charles Hogan - Development Planner Jason Shallcross - Director of Community & Economic Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Tom Sirant, Petitioner/Property Owner Chessa Sirant, Property Owner Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM. Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on October 23, 2025. The minutes were approved 4-0 (Commissioner Costa arrived after the approval of the meeting minutes). After hearing the first item of new business, Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ-20-25, a request by the property owner for conditional use approval to reduce the minimum interior (north) Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-20-25 Page 12 of 66 side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet to accommodate a pergola attached to the single-family residence at 810 S I Oka Avenue. Staff Presentation Mr. Hogan summarized the background of the request. He explained that a building permit was issued in 2024 for a 46-8" x 14'-3" attached pergola, which, because it is physically connected to the principal structure, is regulated by principal -structure setbacks rather than accessory - structure standards. Under R-1 zoning, the required north side yard setback is 7.5 feet. Upon final inspection in spring 2025, staff determined that the pergola had been built 6.5 feet from the property line, encroaching 1 foot into the required setback. Mr. Hogan explained that the petitioner was advised either to relocate the structure or to pursue retroactive zoning relief through a conditional use request. The petitioner is seeking the latter in order to retain the pergola as constructed. Mr. Hogan provided an overview of zoning compliance and bulk regulations for the R-1 District, noting that the proposal involves no changes to lot coverage, front yard, rear yard, or exterior side yard setbacks. Only the interior (north) side yard is affected. Mr. Hogan also summarized the property history, noting that the lot is bordered entirely by R-1 zoning and that improvements overtime have been typical of single-family residences. He stated that the setback encroachment occurred despite the originally issued permit and that conditional use relief is the appropriate remedy under Section 14.604 of the Zoning Ordinance, which allows Limited setback reductions as a conditional use. Public Comment Mr. Hogan reported that: • One letter of support was submitted by the owner of 808 S I Oka Avenue, the most directly affected neighboring property to the north. • One letter of opposition was received from another nearby resident expressing concern regarding potential precedent; staff clarified that all conditional uses are reviewed on a case -by -case basis. Standards & Findings Mr. Hogan presented staff's findings. Staff determined that the 1-foot setback reduction is a minor deviation that will not create adverse impacts on adjacent properties, public safety, or neighborhood character. The most affected neighbor expressed written support, and the request is consistent with Village plans encouraging reasonable residential reinvestment. Staff noted that the conditional use conforms to applicable standards. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-20-25 Page 13 of 66 In conclusion, Mr. Hogan stated that staff finds that the proposed setback reduction satisfies the criteria for a conditional use. Mr. Hogan requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: "Motion to approve: 1. A conditional use to reduce the minimum interior side yard setbackfrom 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet for the construction of a pergola at 810 South I Oka Avenue, Case No. PZ-20-25, subject to the following conditions: a. The conditional use for the reduced interior side yard setback shall apply only to the pergola and shall not apply to any other elements of a principal or accessory structure; b. The improvements shall be in strict conformance with the plat of survey attached as Exhibit B in the staff report; Mr. Hogan stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision on the requests is final. Discussion After Mr. Hogan concluded his presentation, commissioners asked several questions. Chairman Donnelly asked for clarification on the details of the permit process that resulted in the non -conformity. Director Shallcross explained how the project was not built to the specification outlined in the permit, which lead to the encroachment. Commissioner Beattie asked how the pergola is connected to the structure of the house. Staff explained that it is connected into the roof structure, but the petitioner could explain the specific construction process. Commissioner Costa asked what would be involved in bringing the structure into conformance with the code. Director Shallcross explained that architectural and other work that would need to be completed and stated that the petitionerwas requesting relief because the they believed the cost would be too high. Commissioner Beattie asked for more information on the permit process which staff explained. Chairman Donnelly asked if the setback reduction would only apply to the pergola or if it applies to other parts of the structure. Director Shallcross clarified that the condition as written would only apply to the pergola. Chairman Donnelly then called up the petitioner. After swearing them in, he asked how the non- conformance came to be and the petitioner explained that it was an honest mistake. Several commissioners expressed concern that the non-conformance created by the conditional use request would exist "forever" or would eventually be modified to create a three -season room or Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-20-25 Page 14 of 66 full addition. The petitioner stated that was not their intention and staff clarified that as the motion is written, that would only be possible through a new conditional use request. With no further questions, Commissioner Donnelly closed the hearing and called for a motion to approve the conditional use request subject to the conditions in the staff report. Commissioner Beattie made a motion that was seconded by Commissioner Szymczak. Hearing no further discussion, the Chairman requested a roll call: U PO N ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Beattie, Rogers, Costa, Donnelly, NAYS: none The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the request (5-0). After hearing two more items of new business, Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens to be heard. Hearing no further discussion, Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Szymczak, and the meetingwas adjourned at 8:34 PM. Charlie Hogan, Development Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-20-25 Page 15 of 66 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-23-25 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: November 13, 2025 1699 Wall Street Suite 550-Q Sharon LMT S&M LLC October 29, 2025 Conditional use approval to operate a massage therapy establishment at the subject property. Joseph Donnelly William Beattie Fay Costa Richard Rogers Wa lte r Szym cza k Michael Fricano Donald Olsen Ewa Weir Charles Hogan — Development Planner Jason Shallcross — Director of Community and Economic Development None Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on October 23, 2025. The minutes were approved 3-0 with Commissioner Rogers and Commission Costa abstaining from the vote. After hearing two items of new business, Chairman Donnelly introduced case number PZ-23-25, 1699 Wall Street Suite 550-Q, a request for a conditional use to operate a massage therapy establishment at the subject property. Mr. Hogan introduced the subject property, a seven -story multi -tenant office building with a mixture of professional office uses. He reported that the petitioner formerly operated am a ssage therapy establishment ("A Plus Massages") at the subject property from 2016 to 2022, but she closed the business in 2022. Mr. Hogan explained that the petitioner would like to re-establish her massage therapy business at the subject property. Mr. Hogan noted that massage therapy businesses require a new conditional use approval when there is a change of location or a change of ownership, or when the use is discontinued for 120 days. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-23-25 Page 16 of 66 Mr. Hogan explained that the business will occupy a 120-square foot suite at the subject property. Shared bathrooms are located on the same floor and are accessible with a door code provided to clients by the petitioner. The petitioner wrote in her application that she strives to give her clients a better quality of life through the use of therapies to ease pain and promote overall wellness. Mr. Hogan reported that services outlined in the proposal include stretching, deep tissue, and Swedish massage. He stated that the petitioner will be the sole practitioner, with proposed hours of operation Monday through Wednesday, 11:OOAM to 6:OOPM. Mr. Hogan reported that no changes are proposed for the interior or exterior of the building. Mr. Hogan stated that the subject property is zoned B-3 Community Shopping District and the site has adequate parking. He noted that the proposed business is by appointment only and the petitioner will be the sole practitioner. Mr. Hogan confirmed that the petitioner submitted a business license application and a massage therapy addendum according to the requirements of Village Code Chapter 11, Article 7 for Massage Establishments. Mr. Hogan concluded that staff finds that the proposed conditional use meets the applicable standards contained in the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. He requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval ofthe following motion: "A conditional use to operate a massage therapy establishment at 1699 Wall Street Suite 550-Q, subject to the following conditions: 1. Any massage therapist employed at the business establishment shall hold a valid massage therapist license with the State of Illinois; 2. Compliance with all applicable development, fire, building, and other Village Codes and regulations; and 3. A new conditional use approval shall be required for: a. A change of ownership involving 50% or more of the officers or partners; b. A change in legal entity; or c. A change in location." Mr. Hogan stated that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Seeing no questions from the Commissioners, Chairman Donnelly invited the petitioner to the stand. Chairman Donnelly swore in the petitioner, Sharon Autman of Sharon LMTS&M LLC, 1699 Wall Street 550-Q, Mount Prospect. Chairman Donnelly asked the petitioner to provide a brief description of their case. Ms. Autman stated that she moved back from Georgia in 2023, and has many clients in the area from the previous business she owned. Since the business will be in the same location, she thought she could just re -apply for a business license but realized she had to go through the zoning process, which she has never done before. Ms. Autman explained that she is asking for permission to work in the same building she was in before, but this time she has no employees. She used to have employees, but covid disrupted the business. Ms. Autman stated she didn't have enough help to keep the business running so she packed up and moved to Georgia, and then came back. She reiterated that she is asking for permission to do what she loves to do. Ms. Autman explained that Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-23-25 Page 17 of 66 has a good rapport with the Village, was a member of the chambers, and was involved in the community. She stated that she recently moved to Westchester from Woodridge, Illinois. Ms. Autman asked for permission to do what she loves to do and do it respectfully. Commissioner Beattie asked if she was moving into the same suite as before. Ms. Autman replied that it is not the same suite, but it is the same building. Hearing no further comments or questions, Chairman Donnelly closed the hearing and asked for a motion to approve the conditions as noted in the staff report. Commissioner Beattie made a motion and Commissioner Szymczak seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Beattie, Rogers, Costa, Donnelly NAYS: None The Planning and Zoning Commission gave a positive recommendation (5-0) to the Village Board for the December 2, 2025 meeting. After hearing one more item of new business, Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens to be heard. Hearing no further discussion, Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak and the meeting was adjourned at 8:34 PM. b, adry mow., ^ M Antonia Lalagos, Development Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-23-25 Page 18 of 66 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-25-25 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: November 13, 2025 1728 East Kensington Road Terry Hilton L LC October 29, 2025 Conditional use approval to operate a massage therapy establishment at the subject property. Joseph Donnelly William Beattie Fay Costa Richard Rogers Wa lte r Szym cza k Michael Fricano Donald Olsen Ewa Weir Charles Hogan — Development Planner Jason Shallcross — Director of Community and Economic Development Miguel A Hernandez Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on October 23, 2025. The minutes were approved 3-0 with Commissioner Rogers and Commission Costa abstaining from the vote. After hearing three items of new business, Chairman Donnelly introduced case number PZ-25-25, 1728 East Kensington Road, a change of ownership for an existing massage therapy establishment at the subject property. Mr. Hogan introduced the subject property, a single -story multi -tenant commercial building with a mixture of restaurant, retail, childcare, professional office, and personal service establishments. He reported that the tenant space has been a massage therapy establishment since 2012, and prior it was used as a dentist office. Mr. Hogan explained that the petitioners propose to operate a 1,240 square foot massage establishment at the subject property, and intend to use the existing layout of the business and the Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-25-25 Page 19 of 66 existing sign. The application stated that the business will provide high -quality therapeutic massage services that promote relaxation, healing, and overall wellbeing. Services outlined in the proposal include Swedish massage, deep tissue massage, hot stone therapy, aromatherapy, reflexology, and couples massage. Mr. Hogan explained that there will be one full-time massage therapist to start, with potential to hire up to three more employees in the future. He noted that the proposed hours of operation are Monday through Sunday 10:OOAM to 10:OOPM. Mr. Hogan reported that clients are seen by appointment or walk-in, with up to seven appointments per day, each appointment lasting 60 to 90 minutes with 15 to 30 minutes between sessions for preparation and sanitation. Mr. Hogan confirmed that the petitioner submitted a business license application and a massage therapy addendum according to the requirements of Village Code Chapter 11, Article 7 for Massage Establishments. He reported that the addendums indicate the petitioners have been employed at massage establishments in Schaumburg, St Charles, Frankfort, and Orland Park, Illinois. Mr. Hogan stated that the subject property is a shopping center between 30,000 and 150,000 square feet, which requires 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Restaurant tenants are calculated separately. He reported that the parking lot is striped with 206 parking stalls, including 7 accessible parking stalls. Mr. Hogan confirmed that the minimum parking requirement for the existing and proposed uses are met. Mr. Hogan concluded that staff finds that the proposed conditional use meets the applicable standards contained in the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. He requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval ofthe following motion: "A conditional use to operate a massage therapy establishment at 1728 East Kensington Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Any massage therapist employed at the business establishment shall hold a valid massage therapist license with the State of Illinois; 2. Compliance with all applicable development, fire, building, and other Village Codes and regulations; and 3. A new conditional use approval shall be required for: a. A change of ownership involving 50% or more of the officers or partners; b. A change in legal entity; or c. A change in location." Mr. Hogan stated that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Seeing no questions from the Commissioners, Chairman Donnelly invited the petitioner to the stand. Chairman Donnelly swore in the petitioners, Mu Chun Li and Shuxin Jian of Terry Hilton LLC, 1728 East Kensington Road, Mount Prospect, and Miguel A Hernandez, of Orland Park. Chairman Donnelly asked the petitioner to provide a brief description of their case. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-25-25 Page 20 of 66 Mr. Hernandez explained that he knows the petitioners and is assisting them with the process. He explained that the petitioners had previously worked at the subject location and when the opportunity arose to buy the business, they purchased it from the prior owner and now have to go through the process of establishing the use. Mr. Hernandez stated that they mailed the legal notice and one envelope was returned. He shared that the petitioners have over 15 years of massage experience between them and confirmed that Ms. Li owns another establishment in Schaumburg and Ms. Jian owns another establishment in Orland Park. Mr. Hernandez reported that the petitioners recently acquired a business in Arlington Heights and that they wish to continue growing their business in Mount Prospect. Commissioner Rogers and Commissioner Beattie asked if the petitioners understood the conditions of approval. Mr. Hernandez replied that the petitioners completed the application and translated everything. He noted that Ms. Jian's husband speaks English and helped them too. Mr. Hernandez stated that Ms. Jian's husband could not attend the meeting so he offered to come instead. Earlier in the day he asked the petitioners to read over everything before the meeting to ensure they understood. Mr. Hernandez reiterated that as former employees of the business, both of them had longtime customers and that was why thought this would be a good opportunity. Hearing no further comments or questions, Chairman Donnelly closed the hearing and asked for a motion to approve the conditions as noted in the staff report. Commissioner Costa made a motion and Commissioner Szymczak seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Beattie, Rogers, Costa, Donnelly NAYS: None The Planning and Zoning Commission gave a positive recommendation (5-0) to the Village Board for the December 2, 2025 meeting. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens to be heard. Hearing no further discussion, Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak and the meeting was adjourned at 8:34 PM. V Antonia Lalagos, Development Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2025 PZ-25-25 Page 21 of 66 Subject Meeting Fiscal Impact (Y/N) Dollar Amount Budget Source Category Type Information Item Cover Page PZ-15-25 / 605 W. Golf Road / Final Plat of Subdivision and CU: Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development / Village Board Final December 11, 2025 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1►1 NEW BUSINESS Action Item The ""Petitioner" (Jason Doland of Doland Engineering, LLC, on behalf of the property owner, Trinity United Methodist Church) is seeking a final plat of subdivision and conditional use approval for a preliminary and final planned unit development to subdivide the church property, a single R-1 zoned lot into six (6) R-1 zoned lots located at 605 W. Golf Road ("Subject Property"). The Village Board has final authority over the final plat of subdivision and the conditional use for a preliminary and final planned unit development. The proposal meets the requirements and standards of the Village Code, and Village Staff ("Staff,"') is supportive of the requests. Discussion Background: The Subject Property was annexed into the Village in 1959 and is located on the south side of West Golf Road, east of Linneman Road. The Subject Property contains an existing church with associated improvements, is zoned R-1 Single Family Residence, and is bordered by the R-1 Single Family Residential District to the north and west, the R-X Single Family Residential District to the south, and B-3 Planned Unit Development properties (an office building and a daycare) to the east. Permit records indicate that various improvements have been made since the church's construction in the 1960s, including interior and exterior remodeling work, signage, electrical, plumbing, fire suppression, roof, fencing, flatwork, and parking lot. Proposal: The Petitioner is proposing to create six residentially -zoned lots of record from one parcel. The Petitioner also seeks conditional use approval for a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). The various elements of the proposal are outlined below. Final Plat of Subdivision: The final plat of subdivision proposes the subdivision of a single R- 1 zoned lot into six (6) R-1 zoned lots. Lots 1 through 4 are intended for the development of single-family residential homes, Lot 5 will remain as the church lot, and "Outlot A" is a separate lot designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1 through 4 and Page 22 of 66 for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5. Parking for the Existing Church: A total of 112 parking spaces (106 standard and 6 accessible), are proposed with the new site plan configuration for the church lot (Lot 5). Based on a Membership Audit for the last three years (2022-2024) provided by the church's pastor, the church's highest recorded attendance is 150 worshipers, including online attendance. Per the zoning code, one parking space is required for every 3 worshipers, resulting in a parking requirement of 50 parking spaces. The parking provision of 112 parking spaces exceeds the Village's parking requirement of 50 parking spaces. Stormwater Management: The existing Trinity United Methodist site drains west towards Linneman Road through a small detention pond installed as part of a previous addition. Both the existing detention storage and outlet for the church property drainage are accounted for in the design of the new subdivision. In addition, per Sections 15.401.A and 15.402. B of the Village Code, stormwater detention is required for the homes built as part of the subdivision. The stormwater runoff for the subdivision (the four residential lots plus Outlot A) would be captured by a storm sewer system around the perimeter of the lots and directed toward underground storage chambers in Outlot A. The small detention pond(s) on the church property would be relocated to the open ground between the parking lot and Outlot A. The discharge from the church detention pond(s) passes through the detention chambers for the residential lots; the combined flow from the church and Outlot A detention facilities discharges through a restrictor, controlling and slowing flow to an existing storm sewer in Linneman Road. While the impervious area to be created by the new residential lots will increase stormwater runoff, this additional runoff will be stored in the detention chambers such that the flow to the existing storm sewers will actually be reduced below the existing runoff rates from the undeveloped property. Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development: Outlot A does not meet the following subdivision standards under Section 15.305 and the bulk regulations required by Section 14.905. Section 15.305.B.4 requires that all lots shall have frontage on a public street. Outlot A is landlocked and does not have frontage on a public street. Section 15.305.B.6 requires that the depth to width ratio shall not exceed two and one-half to one (2.5: 1) for all lots. The depth to width ratio for Outlot A is 10.35:1 and exceeds the requirement. Section 14.905 requires a minimum lot width of 65 feet. The lot width proposed for Outlot A is only 26 feet. Section 14.905 requires a minimum lot area of 8,125 square feet. The lot area proposed for Outlot A is only 7,001 square feet. Due to several deviations from the zoning code and subdivision standards that are required as highlighted in Table 1 and Table 2 in the staff report, the Petitioner is seeking conditional use approval for a planned unit development. The planned unit development will be conditioned so that the building elevations of the future homes that will be developed on Lots 1 through 4 will not be identical or monotonous. As part of the approval, staff recommends that a Homeowners Association (HOA) be created for Lots 1 through 5, encompassing Outlot A, for the required stormwater management of the entire proposed subdivision. A condition of approval has been added to ensure that the HOA document will be drafted for the Village's review and approval prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for Lots 1 through 4. Long -Range Planning: The Existing and Future Land Use Maps in the Village's Comprehensive Plan designate the Subject Property as Institutional. Primary uses within this category include governmental, educational, religious, and senior housing facilities. The proposed development maintains a substantial portion of the site for institutional use while Page 23 of 66 introducing four new single-family residential lots along Linneman Road. These homes will complement the established single-family character of the surrounding neighborhood. Overall, the proposed development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use designation. Public Comments: As of this writing, staff has not received any public comments. Alternatives A. Approval of the following motions: 1. A final plat of subdivision titled "Trinity Church Resubdivision" prepared by Doland Engineering, LLC, and bearing the latest revision date of September 9, 2025, attached as Exhibit B in the staff report; and 2. A conditional use for a preliminary and final Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of six R-1 zoned lots including four lots (Lots 1, 21 3 and 4) that are intended for the development of four separate single-family detached residential homes, one lot (Lot 5) that will remain as the church lot, and one lot (Outlot A) that is a separate lot designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 and for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. B. Action at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff Recommendation Approval of the following motions: 1. A final plat of subdivision titled ""Trinity Church Resubdivision" prepared by Doland Engineering, LLC, and bearing the latest revision date of September 9, 2025, attached as Exhibit B in the staff report; and 2. A conditional use for a preliminary and final Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of six R-1 zoned lots including four lots (Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4) that are intended for the development of four separate single-family detached residential homes, one lot (Lot 5) that will remain as the church lot, and one lot (Outlot A) that is a separate lot designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 and for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Attachments 1. PZ-15-2 5 Staff Report 2. PZ-15-25 Administrative Content Redacted 3. PZ-15-25 Final Plat of Subdivision 4. PZ-15-25 Plans 5. PZ-15-25 Membership Audit Page 24 of 66 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect., IL 60056 1­ STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development InI 11, Jason C Shallcross, AICP, CEcD Ann Choi Director of Community Development Development Planner DATE: December 4, 2025 CASE NUMBER PZ-1 5-25 PUBLIC HEARING DATE December 11, 2025 APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER Jason Doland, DoLand Engineering., LLC Trinity United Methodist Church (Sam Sangmyung Park) PROPERTY ADDRESS&OCATION, 605 W. Golf Road BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST The "Petitioner" (Jason DoLand of DoLand Engineering, LLC., on behalf of the property owner, Trinity United Methodist Church) is seeking a final plat of subdivision and conditional use approvaLfor a preliminary and final planned unit development to subdivide the church property., a single R-1 zoned Lot into six (6) R-1 zoned Lots Located at 605 W. Golf Road ("Subject Property"). The Village Board has final authority over the final plat of subdivision and the conditional use for a preliminary and final planned unit development. The proposal meets the requirements and standards of the Village Code,, and Village Staff ("Staff") is supportive of the requests. 2024 Ae ri a L I m age 2025 Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Map o S,�ubject Property Subject Property EXISTING EXISTING LAND USE/ SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE SIZE OF ZONING SITE IMPROVEMENTS North: R-1 Single -Family Residential PROPERTY R-1 Church East: B-3* Planned Unit Development 4.43 acres Single -Family South: R-X Single -Family Residential. Residential. West: R-1 Single -Family Residential I I '01�����"� APPROVE l0000* APPROVE WITH DENY STAFF RECOMMENDATION CONDITIONS HAPLANTIa nning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 20251Staff Reports\PZ-1 5-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat-H na I PUD)Aou 1 Page 25 of 66 BACKGROUND / PROPERTY HISTORY The Subject Property was annexed into the Village in 1959 and is located on the south side of West Golf Road, east of Linneman Road. The Subject Property contains an existing church with associated improvements, is zoned R-1 Single Family Residence, and is bordered by the R-1 Single Family Residential District to the north and west, the R-X Single Family Residential District to the south, and 13- 3 Planned Unit Development properties (an office building and a daycare) to the east. Permit records indicate that various improvements have been made since the church's construction in the 1960s, including interior and exterior remodeling work, signage, electrical, plumbing., fire suppression, roof, fencing, ftatwork, and parking Lot. PROPOSAL The Petitioner is proposing to create six residentially zoned Lots of record from one parcel. The Petitione r a Lso see ks cond itionaL use a pproval f o r a preLi mi na ry and f i na L plan ned u nit develop ment (PUD).Thevariouselementsofthe proposal are outlined below. Final Plat of Subdivision The final plat of subdivision proposes the subdivision of a single R-1 zoned lot into six (6) R-1 zoned Lots. Lots 1 through 4 are intended for the development of single-family residential homes, Lot 5 will remain as the church Lot, and "Outlot A" is a separate Lot designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1 through 4 and for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lots. The following table outlines the project's compliance with the bulk regulation requirements for the R-1 Single Family Residential district. Table 1: R-1 Bulk Regulations R-1 Code Requirement Proposed Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Outtot Church A Minimum Lot Area 8.,125 SF 9,343 99493 8,708 8,708 150,361 7,001 (Interior Lots) SF SF SF SF SF SF Minimum Lot Width 65$ 70-86' 70-86' 65' 65' 312.53' 261 Minimum Setbacks: 30' 30 62.40' Front Interior Side 7.1' (Lots 1-2) 10) N/A Un- (Lots 1 -4) 6.5' (Lots 3-4) buitd Interior Side 20' N/A 42 07' abte (Lot ) 5 141.6519 Rear (Lots 1-4) 25' 1 25' N/A Rear (Lot 5) 20' N/A 121-079 Max. Lot Coverage . ......... Lots 1-4 45% 45% N/A Lot 5 75% 56% Max. Floor Area Ratio 0.5 0.5 L 0-35* N/A *Based on a conservative estimate of the gross floor area for a 2-story church. HAP LANTia n n i n g & Zoning C 0 M M \ P &Z 20251Staff Re po rts\PZ- 15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final P [at-Fi n a i PU D). d ocx 2 Page 26 of 66 , Ra., r k` Wn - Vi. � Q. I th Ch-ur c m i, A total of 112 parking spaces (106standard and 6accessible), are proposed with the new site plan configuration for the church Lot (Lot 5). Based on a Membership Audit for the last three years (2022- 2024) provided by the church's pastor, the church's highest recorded attendance is 150 worshipers., including online attendance. Per the zoning code., one parking space is required for every 3 worshipers resulting in a parking requirement of 50 parking spaces. The parking provision of 112 parking spaces exceeds the Village's parking requirement of 50 parking spaces. The existing Trinity United Methodist site drains west towards Linneman Road through a small detention pond installed as part of a previous addition. Both the existing detention storage and outlet for the church property drainage are accounted for in the design of the new subdivision. In addition, per Sections 15.401.A and 15.402.13 of the Village Code, stormwater detention is required for the homes built as part of the subdivision. The stormwater runoff for the subdivision (the four residential lots plus Outtot A) would be captured by a storm sewer system around the perimeter of the lots and directed toward underground storage chambers in OutLot A. The small detention pond(s) on the church property would be relocated to the open ground between the parking Lot and Outtot A. The discharge from the church detention pond(s) passes through the detention chambers for the residential lots; the combined flow from the church and OutLot A detention facilities discharges through a restrictor, controlling and slowing flow to an existing storm sewer in Linneman Road. While the impervious area to be created by the new residential lots will increase stormwater runoff, this additional runoff will be stored in the detention chambers such that the flow to the existing storm sewers will actually be reduced below the existing runoff rates from the undeveloped property. Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development OutLot A does not meet the following subdivision standards under Section 15.305 and the bulk regulations required by Section 14.905. Section 15.305.B.4 requires that all Lots shalt have frontage on a public street. OutLot A is Landlocked and does not have frontage on a public street. Section 15.305.B.6 requires that the depth to width ratio shalt not exceed two and one-half to one (2.5:1) for all. Lots. The depth to width ratio for OutLot A is 10.35:1 and exceeds the requirement. Section 14.905 requires a minimum Lot width of 65 feet. The Lot width proposed for OutLot A is only 26 feet. Section 14.905 requires a minimum lot area of 8,,125 square feet. The lot area proposed for Outlot A is only 7,001 square feet. Tabte 2: Subdivision Standards F .....Cod.-e Requ" ..... ir"" ..... e -- - me .... nt Outiot A 15-305.B.4 ALL Lots shall have frontage on a public street. LandLocked Not met 15.305.B.6 The depth to width ratio shall not exceed two 10.35:1 1 and one-half to one (2.5:1 for all Lots. Not met Due to several deviations from the zoning code and subdivision standards that are required as highlighted in Table 1 and Table 2, the Petitioner is seeking conditional use approval for a planned unit H:\PLAN\Ptanning& Zoning COMWPU2025\Staff Reports\PZ-15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat—RnalPUD).docx 3 Page 27 of 66 development. The planned unit development will be conditioned so that the building elevations of the future homes that will be developed on Lots 1 through 4 will not be identical or monotonous. As part of the approval, staff recommends that a Homeowners Association {HOA) be created for Lots 1 through 5., encompassing OutLot A, for the required stormwater management of the entire proposed subdivision. A condition of approval has been added to ensure that the HOA document will be drafted for the Village's review and approval prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for Lots 1 through 4. LONG-RANGE PLANNING The Existing and Future Land Use Maps in the Village's Comprehensive Plan designate the Subject Property as Institutional. Primary uses within this category include governmental, educational, religious., and senior housing facilities. The proposed development maintains a substantial portion of the site for institutional use white introducing four new single-family residential Lots along Linneman Road. These homes will complement the established single-family character of the surrounding neighborhood. Overall, the proposed development wit[ be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use designation. PUBLIC COMMENTS As of this writing, staff has not received any public comments. STANDARDS AND FINDINGS The Planning and Zoning Commission shalt review the standards and findings of fact outlined in Exhibit A and 1) accept them without changes, 2) accept them with changes, or 3) reject the findings. The Planning and Zoning Commission shalt use the findings of fact to guide their recommendation to the Village Board. Staff finds that the standards for a conditional use and planned unit development have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's and staff's responses to the standards. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and r mcl_a,ppro a, of the following motions: , _ _ )t_j .-econimm-e- 1. Afinat plat of subdivision titled "Trinity Church Resubdivision" prepared by DoLand Engineering, LLC, and bearing the Latest revision date of September 9, 2025, attached as Exhibit B in the staff report; 2. A conditional use for a final Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of six R-1 zoned tots including four Lots (Lots 1, 29 3 and 4) that are intended for the development of four separate single-family detached residential homes, one tot (Lot 5) that will remain as the church Lot, and one tot (Outlot A) that is a separate Lot designated for stormwater volume control and detention for Lots 1., 29 3 and 4 and for accepting discharge from the detention storage on Lot 5, subject to the following conditions: a. Prior to obtaining the first temporary certificate of occupancy for Lots 1 through 4., the Petitioner shalt submit homeowners' association documents for staff review and approval. The document shalt address Long-term site maintenance., including the maintenance of "OutLot A". b. No sale of any parcel of Land shall be consummated until the final subdivision plat has been approved by the Village Board. HAPLAN\P(anning& Zoning COMMT&Z2025\Staff Reports\PZ-15-25 605WGolf Rd (Final Ptat_Fina1PUD).doCX 4 Page 28 of 66 c. Any existing accessory structures located on Lots 1 through 4, including but not Limited to the parking lot, playground equipment, Light poles, and traffic signs., shall be removed in their entirety prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first home, but need not be removed prior to recording of the final plat. d. Architectural Diversity: To promote architectural diversity and avoid repetitive building patterns, no single-family dwelling constructed within the Trinity Church Resubdivision (Lots 1 through 4) shalt be similar in appearance to any single-family dwelling Located on the same street within a distance of two (2) Lots in either direction of the subject tot. i. Definition of "Similar in Appearance": For purposes of this subsection, two dwellings shall be considered similar in appearance if they are identical or nearly identical with respect to any three (3) or more of the following architectural characteristics: 1. Primary roof form, including the dominant roof type (gable, hip, mansard, gambrel, flat, or combination): 2. Roof height, measured from finished grade to the peak, within a tolerance of +/- 2 feet; 3. Front -facing massing, defined as the approximate height and width of the primary front wall plane closest to the front tot Line; 4. Overall front -elevation form, including the predominant silhouette and massing as viewed from the street; 5. Fenestration pattern, including the relative Location., arrangement, and size of windows on the front elevation; 6. Garage configuration., including the location, orientation, and dimensions of garage doors visible from the street; and 7. Primary exterior siding materials on the front elevation wall planes (e.g... brick veneer, horizontal siding, board -and -batten, shakes, or similar materials). ii. Characteristics Not Constituting Dissimilarity: The following characteristics, standing alone, shall not be deemed sufficient to establish dissimilarity between dwellings: 1. Variations in color; 2. Variations in roofing material; 3. Addition or deletion of minor decorative elements (including., but not Limited to, dormers, cupolas, bay windows, belt courses, fan Lights, chimneys., or ornamental features); 4. Reversal of plan orientation (right-hand/left-hand orientation); 5. Variation in window styles; and 6. Variations in height, width, or Length measurements of less than five percent (5%), unless otherwise specified herein. iii. Submission and Approval Requirements: Prior to issuance of any building permit within the subdivision, the applicant shall submit: 1. A proposed set of building elevations for all planned home models; and 2. A streetscape diagram or tot assignment plan demonstrating compliance with the spacing requirement established in this subsection. The Director of Community Development shall review the submitted elevations and tot assignments for compliance with the requirements of this subsection. Approved elevations and Lot assignments shall be binding upon subsequent building permit HAPLANTIanning& Zoning COMM\P&Z2025\Staff Reports\PZ-15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final PIat_FinalPUD),,,doCX Page 29 of 66 reviews. e. All visible structures within the front yards of Lots 1 through 4 associated with the underground stormwater management system shall be screened and aesthetically enhanced, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. Required improvements may include, but are not limited to, decorative surface treatments (such as stamped or stained concrete), landscape screening with shrubs and/or ornamental grasses, or other beautification measures deemed acceptable by the Community Development Director. The Village Board's decision is final. ATTACHMENTS: ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENT (Zoning Request Application, Responses to Standards, etc...) --.000 1concur: Jason C Shallcross,,AICP, CEcD Director of Community Development PLANS (Plat of Survey, Site Plan, etc.) OTHER (Supplemental Information, Public Comments Received, 14411, etc...) -00 H:\PLAN\Ptanning& Zoning C0MM\P&Z2025\Staff Reports\PZ-15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat—Fina[PUD).docx Page 30 of 66 Exhibit A Standards and Findings of Fact CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance provides that a Conditional Use shall conform to the following requirements: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be Located; 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads,, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; 5. That adequate measures have been or will betaken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current comprehensive plan for the village; and 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is Located, except as such regulations may., in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the planning and zoning commission. The Petitioner states that the proposed subdivision will create four new single family homes along Linneman Road, providing compatible infill development within an established residential area while maintaining the existing church use on Lot 5. The Petitioner notes that the project includes installation of a new underground stormwater management system that will improve on -site drainage and reduce runoff to surrounding properties. The Petitioner contends that the new homes will be consistent in scale and appearance with nearby residences and are expected to enhance neighborhood character and property values. The Petitioner indicates that all necessary public utilities exist along Linneman Road and will be extended or relocated as needed to serve the development. The Petitioner asserts that the limited traffic generated by four new homes will have Little to no effect on existing traffic volumes, and that the church will continue to access Golf Road. The Petitioner further states that the proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan's single-family residential Land use designation and complies with applicable zoning regulations., aside from the requested exceptions necessary to accommodate site design and stormwater improvements. 5 ta.-s : Granting the proposed subdivision and conditional use for a preliminary and final'Ri n 9,s planned unit development will not be detrimental to public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare as the development establishes single-family residential lots that are consistent with the surrounding neighborhood character and maintains the existing church use, which has operated for several decades. The design of the subdivision complies with applicable subdivision and zoning code requirements related to building separation, Lot coverage and stormwater management. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use or enjoyment of other property in the vicinity. The introduction of four new single-family residential Lots are not inconsistent with the similarly zoned Lots to the north and west of the subject property. The proposed planned unit development is conditioned so that the proposed homes on Lots 1 through 4 will provide variations in the appearance of the buildings to avoid identical or HAPLAN\Ptanning &Zoning COMM\P&Z 202515taff Reports\PZ-1 5-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat -Final PUD),,,docx 7 Page 31 of 66 similar building elevations. Adequate public utilities, drainage, and related facilities are provided to the site. The stormwater management design includes an outlot to accommodate volume control and detention in compliance with MWRD and Village standards. Utility service connections will be provided as necessary to each new residential lot in accordance with Village and utility provider requirements. The project will not increase traffic volume or impact on -street parking as sufficient parking will be provided for the church and each new single-family residential dwelling unit will provide off-street parking. The proposed planned unit development is not contrary to the objectives of the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for institutional use, which encompasses governmental, educational, and religious uses, as well as senior housing. The proposed subdivision retains a substantial portion of the site as an institutional use for the church white introducing a compatible low -density residential component that aligns with surrounding Land uses. Based on these findings, staff concludes that the proposed planned unit development meet the standards for a conditional use and recommends approval of the requested conditional use. GENERAL STANDARDS FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS Section 14.504.A of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance provides that a Planned Development shall conform to the following requirements: 1. Except as modified by and approved in the final Planned Unit Development plan., the proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is to be Located. 2. The principal use in the proposed Planned Unit Development is consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village for the area containing the subject site. 3. The proposed Planned Unit Development is in the public interest and is consistent with the purposes of this zoning ordinance. 4. The streets have been designed to avoid: a. Inconvenient or unsafe access to the Planned Unit Development; b. Traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin the Planned Unit Development; c. An excessive burden on public parks., recreation areas,, schools., and other public facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the Planned Unit Development. Rei-it i aw Fad,lngs: The Petitioner states that the proposed planned unit development complies with all applicable Village zoning regulations for the residential district in which it is located. The Petitioner contends that the development is consistent with the Village's Comprehensive Plan, which supports residential use of the subject property. The Petitioner asserts that the proposal is in the public interest, as it introduces four new single-family homes that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and will not alter the established residential character of the neighborhood. The Petitioner states that each home will have direct vehicular access to Linneman Road., providing safe and convenient ingress and egress without generating traffic congestion. The Petitioner further notes that the estimated population increase of sixteen people (4 persons per home) from four new homes will have minimal impact on local parks, schools, and public facilities. taf S, f $_F:[n,diM: Except as modified by and approved in the final planned unit development, the proposal complies with the regulations of the district in which it is located. The proposed subdivision and planned unit development generally meet the intent of the underlying R-1 single -Family Residence District., providing single-family Lots that conform to applicable bulk., area, and yard requirements, except where relief is requested as part of the planned unit development to accommodate OutLot A. The proposed H:\PLAN\Ptanning& Zoning C0MM1P&Z20251Staff ReportsTZ-15-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final P(at_FinatPUD).docx 8 Page 32 of 66 planned unit development is not contrary to the objectives of the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for institutional use., which encompasses governmental; educational, and religious uses, as well as senior housing. The proposed subdivision retains a substantial portion of the site as an institutional use for the church while introducing a compatible Low - density residential component that aligns with surrounding land uses. The development will provide an improved stormwater management infrastructure to the existing conditions providing a benefit to the public interest. The new church Lot will utilize its existing driveway along Golf Road and close an existing driveway on Linneman Road to accommodate the four new single-family residential lots that will have their driveways along Linneman Road. No new public roads are proposed. Each single-family Lot will be accessed via Linneman Road, and the reconfigured parking and circulation plan for the church lot will maintain safe ingress and egress. The addition of four single-family homes is not expected to generate traffic volumes that would negatively affect surrounding streets or place a significant burden on nearby public parks, schools, or municipal services. STANDARDS FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS WITH OTHER EXCEPTIONS Section 14.504.0 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance states that the Village Board may approve planned unit developments which do not comply with the requirements of the underlying zoning district's regulations governing Lot area, Lot width., bulk regulations, parking and sign regulations, or which require modification of the subdivision design standards when such approval is necessary to achieve the objectives of the proposed planned unit development, but only when the Board finds such exceptions are consistent with the following standards: 1. Any reduction in the requirements of this chapter is in the public interest. 2. The proposed exceptions would not adversely impact the value or use of any other property. 3. Such exceptions are solely for the purpose of promoting better development which will be benef iciaL to the residents or occupants of the planned unit development as well as those of the surrounding properties. 4. In residential planned unit developments the maximum number of dwelling units allowed per acre shalt not exceed forty eight (48) units per acre for developments incorporating senior housing or assisted Living facilities. 5. ALL buildings are to be Located within the planned unit development in such a way as to dissipate any adverse impact on adjoining buildings and shalt not invade the privacy of the occupants of such buildings and shalt conform to the following: a. The front, side or rear yard setbacks on the perimeter of the development shalt not be Less than that required in the abutting zoning district(s) or the zoning district underlying the subject site, whichever is greater. b. All transitional yards and transitional landscape yards of the underlying zoning district are complied with. c. If required transitional yards and transitional landscape yards are not adequate to protect the privacy and enjoyment of property adjacent to the development,, the Planning and Zoning Commission shalt recommend either or both of the following requirements: i. ALL structures located on the perimeter of the planned unit development must be set back by a distance sufficient to protect the privacy and amenity of adjacent existing uses; ii. ALL structures Located along the entire perimeter of the planned unit development must be permanently screened with sight -proof screening in a manner which is sufficient to protect the privacyand amenity of adjacent existing uses. HAPLANTlanning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 20251Staff Reports\PZ-1 5-25 605 W Golf Rd (Final Plat -Final PUD).docx Page 33 of 66 d. The area of open space provided in a planned unit deveLopmentshaLL beat Leastthat required in the underlying zoning district. rcM, g-s: The Petitioner states that the requested reductions from the zoning requirements are in the public interest, as they are necessary to accommodate a new underground stormwater management system that will serve the subdivision. The Petitioner explains that OutLot "A," white deficient in street frontage, width, and area, fulfills an essential public purpose by providing on -site stormwater detention where none currently exists. Access for maintenance will be provided through public utility easements along the Lot Lines. The Petitioner asserts that the proposed exceptions will not negatively affect surrounding property values or uses and that the new single-family homes will complement the existing neighborhood character and may enhance surrounding property values. The Petitioner contends that the exceptions are solely intended to promote a better site design that benefits both future residents and the surrounding community. The Petitioner notes that the subdivision complies with the maximum allowable density for residential developments and that all required building setbacks, transitional yards., and landscape buffers meet the R-1 District standards. The Petitioner further states that the design maintains adequate open space within each tot consistent with single- family residential development patterns in the area. 51affs-ERndings: The staff -supported relief requests for OutLot A are in the public interest and intended solely to promote a higher -quality development, as the creation of a substandard tot is necessary to accommodate a new stormwater management system that will reduce existing runoff rates and enhance the overall efficiency and functionality of stormwater detention on the site. The addition of four single- family homes is not expected to adversely impact the value or use of any other property. The proposed planned unit development provides four new tots that wilt accommodate four single-family detached homes., far below the maximum density permitted. No senior housing or assisted Living facilities are proposed. The project's overall density is consistent with the R-1 single -Family Residence District standards and aligns with the established character of the surrounding area. The front, side and rear yard setbacks for Lots 1 through 5 are not Less than that required,, and the overall Lot coverage requirement of 75% for nonresidential use (Lot5) and 45% residential uses (Lots 1 through 4 and the outLot) are met for all six Lots. HAPLANT[anning& Zoning COMM\P&Z2025\Staff Repoits \PZ-15-25605W Golf Rd (Final Plat_FinatPUD).docx 10 Page 34 of 66 Exhibit B Final Plat of Subdivision Trinity Church Resubdivision n It'Q 59 ZT, -R 1�0 i N Y�,Iv A, fn� ? 4. 414 i A ilk Ell hi lzt tE j t 99 44 i "2 G!2 Mj �6 T. , ; -,R, 6,1= & W ; 1 11 t " . &,S� M, If, F"A 5Ik .. . . ....... . . . . .. . . ................................. r Q, 4 INN y . . ....... . . . ... . . . . . ............. . # cu Mll mr Uj 4M 46 z 9 .......... )w" UbS 100'1 Xmmmmm , 10UM J� 7 K�7� WK � -_4 L V, t. P 4, 1: 1! 1 11A ID 4 1 --77 HH-H— . . . ......... . . . .. . .... . ..... . . Ail UVOU A`0Y3NV'T7 ''HHHHH- 1:Z VD, T4 P �v 5 n IL 0 IT ll� 21 ch 9 ua JOTcx p t [4 �R- Lk 0 4 1 -t 11 CD 'A 61 > Cl) .� .* ,`. �q u.. s ""...... s �i �.,. �Nz Its~ 00 1A, M 0 LU M 3 R T % ,Oap in i", ai ;Y U. m 44, 71 it I ''1 2 0 a A, it III 0 V CL W. 5 4 3 U 6- b J HAPLAMPlanning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 20251Staff Reports\PZ-1 5-25 605 W Gotf Rd (Final Plat -Final PUD).docx 11 Page 35 of 66 Letter View Village of Mount Prospect, Community Development Department 50 S. EmersoriStreet Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone: ('847) 818-53,28 Zoning, Request Appli+catian . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . E L A.- 17176 ",Lw I ...................... ... ............ .......... . .... -------------------- =1 I I. Subjecrope Ad,dress(e�6,05 W Golf Rd', zoning DistrIct(s): R11 Property Area (S,q,Ft, and/or Acreage)., 4.43 acres, -2 3-015-0000 Parcel (PIN(s): 08-14, 0 II. Zoning Request(s) (CInc kall that apply) I 0 Oond"Iftiona] Use: For Planned Unit Development nw..y� Varlation(s),- To Zoning Map Amen,dmentl: Rezonerom, TO Zoning'Text,Amendment: Section(s) Other. Final Plat of Subdivision rioces lnmaryq!� rPp4Oa,,(U 0 PA jf Trinity United Methodist Church would I'like, to create 4 resWentia' lots dilvildled from t, e"ir, current church, (6 toots) ewinlg, Name-., Jason Doland Corporation,: Doland Eng,iln LLC A dd ress: I 334 E. Colfax, Street, Un"t C ClItyp State, ,ZIP Code: Palatln,e IL 60 67 Phonel: Email.: Interest n P roperty: Check if Same as Applicant Name: Trinity Meth Church Address: 605 W Golf Rd: Cify, State, ZIP Code: Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Phone: Application Record.htm Page 36 oft63 MEMO IILetter View ( P r1l'i nt or Type N a m e) Jason Doland D a, t eO - I herebydeslignate theapplicant to act, as my ageest(s) described 'I'n tKi's application and the associated supporting material. to] !IMI I 1 11 " fi lo -.///C.,tU sorsliacho Ioad sJZon i ng Application Record. htm Page 37 of2&6' Vi t La ge of M o u nt P, ro s, p e c t vgnm aisi at,t, suipporting In consideration of th�e� infbrmat"J'on Contalned in th�iIs pletition as m Lit, d, lol,,cu�rn�ent�a��t��ici�n��,01 ft, is ve requestleld thlat.approval, �bille! gIn to thlis request. The ap�pticaniIt s, the ownler or 0 aulthorlized representative of! the owner of' the prollperty. The petitioner, and tie owner of t�e prop,erty I I I gran't empLoyeles ,of the Vittage of Mount Prospect a!nid thlel'r agent's plemissmion to,, enter on the property c1huring reasioniable hours for lvisual, Iinspection, of thel, subject property., I hgarleby affirm that attlinformiation provided herefn and lin all, rniaterJaLs submitted In assoletaton 0 a Licalitillion a with ppil artruel and ��ccurate 'to the, bleat of ray knilowLieldge. 1 J Appant* Je lo, Datel Uc Signaturle 4,><0010 -- I hereby designate the applicant, to act as my ag�ent 'foll�r the p�ur�plolse of' seeking 'th�e zaning, req!uestO) ci diellseribeld ir,i� tt,iis: appiti ation and the assoclated supplorting material. Pro,perty Owner (Signature) (Rrint or Ty,ple Name) Page 38 of 66 Prospect Vill age, of,M cl u nA 0�01 mlope ment Departmintimunity De,v,e It 50 S. Emerson Strele! Mount Prospect, ROnoJJ< lis 601056 Rhoinle.�- (847), 818-51328 EM= STATE 0 F I LLI N 0 IS A .Under oIa�th�, statiel that I a (print name) t"he witle owinier olfthe property an owner of -the pricipierty 121n alUtholrized officer for the owner: of thre property Commonly delsicribed OR, (p rol p e, rtyl d re ss a In d P I N) 10 1, "1 fivkv; owne AVI A as, of thi,si date,, d by, kjt�/4/61R and thatsuch property 1' . ........ I — .. ..... - . ..................... (p r in It n a im e) . ............ . . S'llginature 2,0 Nl' /9 ww "� � "NM l Page 39 of 66 orthe,�rn�11:1�i�nois', Conference S OF THE,, UNITED METI-10D], 1,T CHURCH 303 1. Wx,kier Dr, --1 Sui�i o to 2020 Chicag, IL 60601 Offi Ca (312) 34G-97 6 6 ajatoist'ri perj'ntendant v. BrAtany Is "'ct Su p Lake. North District - Re M.785 Corg, b1saaclAilmn" 312-346-9766 I Rev. SangMyung Sam Park i 154,,5 Sycamore Lane Aurora, IL 6051,04 Dear Rev. Park,, Greetigsii in the grace wet share 'InChn"st. i behalf of Bishop Dian Schiweriin avid the Nlorthern K[ihois Conference Ca net, it is my pleasure i n,d Tri t United'! Melithio6ist to� conffrm 'your, appolintmient to� the community of Mount Prospect a int y Chur,ch, effOictive July, 11 , 2,024,, The Bishopand Gabi,net are committed to,: yoiur� appoinitment for the fob lo,,Mng missional reasions: lie We all oil 0, Wr W 01, it you and Reiv. Wendy Hardin Flierimanni, In additiw to �la�y and 6'1'erg iog, i is,, my expectat"on that y traji n spen -h othe r over the next few mo nths wo�rkpinl, the currielint pastoir,,, will; �d time cornimunicating with ea,c to ensure the church is cared fo�r in this, time of changie. Please do niot hesitate to be, in touch if you havie any furtheir quiestwilions= Rev. Rrittanylls,aac Lakle North Distrilict, Superintendent Northern Illinois Conference yyom,,umqn11C.Gr,9 The Uniteld Methodist. Church movvv.irw I'c'.10 M32= Page 40 of 66 E Note: The above; amountsare'lliustrationS of how much, government debt could be attributed tio your property, biasIed on, Its 2024 value., See Details Hierie Incorrect Image?. Click Herel. Property Location,: Mailing Information: 605 W GOLF RD No Wifing Address Found MOUNT PROSPECT IL 600156-0000 Update Your [tiformation Volu,Tte-., 049 jr;k's I Oil! htt,ps-.//.coy kcount,ytroa,si,uror.comlyourp,r�rviewrosuh,s.as,px Page 41 ofl&b Original BMW Amountim . ,,,/, it � � ;/i if, ' iJo it /mii T� '/� 3/1 i ii n»i Current Amount I 0.00 / , r ' p l' i I �,i, ° ! ,,� i i 1, $0.01 0 1� 10III u �i . $0.00 Due Date. 0 0 20,24 'Tax-. $0.0 Interest.,�0�00 Current Amount Du I Number This Property Index li WTI 'I .iffi',bytt/lhe Cook s " fi;I o be exempt ftoiin taxabonr 2021 There,,fore, no property tax b1 exissts foffax Year 20,21 ri l0 l Bi l led . $0.00 Due Dates 0, �2;2/ ,,, ,,, ,,, 0�0 In ..... . "dill%;�, 77/ I ,,,, ,,, ;,1101 10 ......... 11/11, „ 71 CurrentDue $0.00 Total Amount $0.00 Tdtal Amount", d: $0.00 ri in101II . $0.00 Due Date-. 1211 /20,25 'Tax.- $0.00 Interest,$ .00 ..'urrent Amount Due: This Property;l' ;i ,(PIN) ihas been ildet,,tflfied by the, Cook County Assess&s Office to Year 2021,4. About payments,-. Payments are recorded twee ate are recei'ved. Thhey appear website about three business days later. General Property, U n, This Property Index N' mber (PIN) has beein id entiffied by the Cook Cou ty Asseszor's,Of to be, exemptotaxation a 2023. Therefore, Year, 2023.. Tax Year 2024 General Pirop" Taxes. ThisPropertyindeXN'l.1 ber (PIIN) hais been Identified by the Cook County,Asseszor's Office to be exempt for Tax tie, aProperty bill exists for Tax Year, 2,024. t-/cookcount,ytroa,si,uror.comlyourp,,,ropertyte�xove�rviewrosuh,s.as,pxPage 42 off "1,2J2j25,, 2:39PM Gook County Treasurer's Office - Chicago, Illinois Stop receiving your tax bill by mail. SlIgnup'f'or, eBilifing to receive f uture tax bills, vla emai"Il. Are There Any Overpayments on Your PIN ?' Ou rrecio rd s do not [""n,,,diicate a ref un d ava ii, I abi e on the P I N you have en'te red. Homeowner Exemption: Sentor Cifizen Exempti, Senior Freeze Exemption: Retumm"ling Veteran Exemption: Disabled Person Exemption: Disabled Veeran, ftemption: Apply for a missing, e'xemiptilon 1 11 11 I I � qF '2024, 2023 2022 2021 NO NO NO NO NO NO, NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO, NO NO NO N'O' NO NO NO NO NO NO Tax'Year' 2004: $0.010 Tax Year, 2024- $0.001 Difference,: 14- $0.00 Percent Change.: N/A See, Yo u r co m p lete p ro p e rty ta x h i slo, ry. htt,Ps-.//.coy kcount,ytroa,si,uror.comlyourp,,,rve�rviewrosuh,s.as,px Page 43 off Doland �E N G I 1'1,�,,J, E E �R 1 [,,4, G Ms. Ann Choi Development Planner Community Development Viflage of Mount Prospect 50S,outh ErnersonStreet Mount Pirospect,,, llfinois, 60056 RE: Triiniity Church 605 West GolfRoad Dear Ms. Ch6i: Enclosed are the ires,ponsesto the PUS Conditional Use Standards, f6r, the above captioned project Il 4.203(l )(8):� Co�n d I�tl'io�n all se Stae, shall �be, recornrnended� for approval bythe Rlanning and� Zoining Commission unless, it finds: a. Teat the establishment, maintenance, or opera,tion of the conditionaluse Will not be, detriirnentalto,, or endangerthe public health,, safety, morals, comf6rt, or general welfare; I Response: The proposeduse of the land will addfour (4) inew single fami]y iresidences, 'to the iresiiiiidential area aloing an existing Village street (Lininemain Road) with a proposed undeirgrountour water system,that will accommodate and managethe stormwateir, W4ich curirently does snot exist. b. That the condition4l use wiEl not be iiiiinjurious to the uses, and enjoyment of otheir property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already perrnitted,i nor su�bstantially it and iiiiimpair propeirty values, within the neiighborhooiiin which it isto be located-; Res once: The proposeuse will fit in inicely with the, existing homes,to the south and� west of the five (5), lot subdiVisiom, The e,'kisting surroundiingi Borne ) property vaIve would not be negatively impacted as to their value and iiiiifanythingi the proposed inew Domes woulirobably increase iiiiinthe[r value. The e,'kisting church located on Lot, 5,1 will remain as, a place ofworshiip with no changes, being made to the structure,Le. y status, quo. c., That the establishment of the conditionaI use Will not impede the, inorimal and orderly development animprovement of the surirounding property for uses permitted inthe distriictl; .1 Doland. Engineering, LLC. Do 1inid E n g i niee ri ng.co ern 33 4 E. Co I finx S treat, Su ite CO Pa I n tiro o.:�, I Iliin i s 601067 Page 44 of 66 605 W Golf Road — PUD Conditional Use Responses 12/02/25 Page 2 of 5 Response: The surrounding R-1 residential zoning district area is fully developed at this time only having the possibility of potential tear -downs and rebuilding of any existing homes, which would in all likelihood be larger in size. d. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; Response: Public utilities currently exist along Linneman Road, which will be tapped into for potable water, sanitary and storm sewer use, as well as gas, electric and cable systems for the four (4) proposed homes. The existing church's sewer and water utilities will be relocated within proposed utility easements. The four (4) proposed home driveways will have direct access to Linneman Road. Stormwater Management facilities meeting Village and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District requirements have been incorporated into the site improvements engineering design. e. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; Response: The additional traffic from the four (4) new driveways that will be added to the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume is insignificant and has little to no effect on the Linneman Road traffic volume or congestion. The church access will remain off of Golf Road. f. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village; Response: The Comprehensive Plan of the Village shows the area to be in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District, and the proposed subdivision meets this objective. g. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; Response: The proposed PUD meets with the Village requirements for the type of use proposed under this subdivision, except for the requested variations needed and necessary for Village compliance in order to improve and construct the proposed four (4) new homes. 14.504(A): General Standards: 1. Except as modified by and approved in the final planned unit development plan, the proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is located. Response: The proposed PUD meets with the Village requirements for the type of use proposed under this subdivision and complies with the Village regulations of the residential district.in which it is located. Page 45 of 66 605 W Golf Road — PUD Conditional Use Responses 12/02/25 Page 3 of 5 2. The principal use in the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village for the area containing the subject site. Response: The proposed single family residential subdivision use of the land (site) is consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village. 3. The proposed planned unit development is in the public interest and is consistent with the purposes of this zoning ordinance. Response: The purpose of the zoning ordinance is to ensure that land uses are consistent, compliant and are in harmony with the adjacent and surrounding area. The four (4) new proposed single family homes are of the same type of housing that surround three (3) sides of the proposed subdivision. The proposed property improvements will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 4. The streets have been designed to avoid: a. Inconvenient or unsafe access to the planned unit development; Response: Linneman Road is an existing north/south paved street which each of the four (4) new driveways having a safe and convenient ingress and egress for access. b. Traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin the planned unit development; Response: There are no new streets proposed with this subdivision as all four (4) homes will each have one driveway as access to Linneman Road, there will not be any congestion created, or existing conditions compounded and made worse by these four (4) proposed homes. c. An excessive burden on public parks, recreation areas, schools, and other public facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned unit development; Response: The estimated population, at 4 persons per home is 16 people, which will have very little impact on any of the public facilities as this would have been considered within the residential zoning aspect of the area. 14.504(C): Standards For Planned Unit Developments With Other Exceptions: The Village Board may approve planned unit developments which do not comply with the requirements of the underlying zoning district's regulations governing lot area, lot width, bulk regulations, parking and sign regulations, or which require modification of the subdivision design standards when such approval is necessary to achieve the objectives of the proposed planned unit development, but only when the Board finds such exceptions are consistent with the following standards: 1. Any reduction in the requirements of this chapter is in the public interest. Response: Outlot "A" is created for the sole purpose of providing underground stormwater management (that currently does not exist) of which the ownership and maintenance will be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association that is to be created as part of the subdivision plat and documents. Section 15.305(B)(4) requires frontage on a public street. Outlot "A" does not have frontage on a public street, Page 46 of 66 605 W Golf Road — PUD Conditional Use Responses 12/02/25 Page 4 of 5 however; access for any required maintenance is provided by means of the proposed public utility easements located along the property lines of the four (4) lots. Section 15.305(6)(6) requires a lot depth to width ratio of not more than 2.5:1 and the ratio of Outlot "A" 10.35:1 which exceeds this requirement but does accomplish the goal of providing the area necessary to install the underground stormwater management system for the subdivision. Section 14.905 requires a minimum lot width of 65 feet for Outlot "A" which has a width of only 26 feet, but; as stated earlier, accomplishes the intended goal for the area needed for the stormwater management system. Section 14.905 requires that Outlot "A" have a minimum lot area of 8,125 square feet which Outlot "A" is deficient by 1,124 square feet or 7,001 square feet provided under the proposed lot dimensions. The constraint conditions placed upon the design are unique to the proposed subdivision in order to meet the Village requirements but do not generally effect the area or its residents. Village staff believes that seeking a PUD for the subdivision would be an appropriate method in order to satisfy the requirements imposed on the design. 2. The proposed exceptions would not adversely impact the value or use of any other property. Response: Other properties values and use in the area would not be adversely affected with the additional four (4) homes. 3. Such exceptions are solely for the purpose of promoting better development which will be beneficial to the residents or occupants of the planned unit development as well as those of the surrounding properties. Response: The proposed homes will fit into and fill in the single family residential area nicely and should add to the surrounding property values. 4. In residential planned unit developments, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed per acre shall not exceed forty eight (48) units per acre for developments incorporating senior housing or assisted living facilities. Response: The homes are designed for single family living and are not built solely for senior citizens or assisted living conditions, however it could be that some family member having these characteristics might be living within the home, particularly with the aging population. 5. All buildings are to be located within the planned unit development in such a way as to dissipate any adverse impact on adjoining buildings and shall not invade the privacy of the occupants of such buildings and shall conform to the following: a. The front, side or rear yard setbacks on the perimeter of the development shall not be less than that required in the abutting zoning district(s) or the zoning district underlying the subject site, whichever is greater. Response: The setbacks meet the Village Zoning requirements of the R-1 Zoning District. b. All transitional yards and transitional landscape yards of the underlying zoning district are complied with. Page 47 of 66 605 W Golf Road — PUD Conditional Use Responses 12/02/25 Page 5 of 5 Response: All transitional yards and transitional landscape yards of the R-1 Zoning district are met and comply with the Village requirements. c. If required transitional yards and transitional landscape yards are not adequate to protect the privacy and enjoyment of the property adjacent to the property to the development, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend either or both of the following requirements: (1) All structures located on the perimeter of the planned unit development must be set back by a distance sufficient to protect the privacy and amenity of adjacent existing uses; (2) All structures located along the entire perimeter of the planned unit development must be permanently screened with sightproof screening in a manner which is sufficient to protect the privacy and amenity of the adjacent uses. d. The area of open space provided in a planned unit development shall be at least that required in the underlying zoning district. Response: The proposed homes are within the limits of the building setbacks within the R-1 Zoning District leaving the lot with single family residential yards as open space. I trust that this addresses the Planned Unit Development Conditional Use Standards required for approval of the Subdivision Plat and intended single family residential use. Sincerely, M rJ �u d son R. Doland, P. E., P. L. S. Page 48 of 66 )(VAf-L8K'.-K,6 ("OrM 09MI-1,681 'jaadscu,,,j )unicp, Lj A,,9000, SIG N= 1XIMNII, a :01ifts I'MUS XVJ110j ISV3 t6lc Fmot AD As S09 'POS.My"JAI �207.' - t)XIA241111s (107. - 09MEMMONS TAM, piny) IsIpayall jp;�J!q 0171 'IWINAS GNVII(Hu IV LNAl 311S 9 Ell II nag MP Cstl tl bd i!i! i!i! 0! 0 -i 0;0;i; . ............................ . iz, aa N !X Q WIN U mull " Him V, RE, K iLIB I 14M. 7rp!i!7 I IE M sit, E P.tl Wipp APP PIT, w no 0 y 0! 0, y 0 4 T iY i=!P.Ac X !ooi noi .;N 0159 OR Sol 1 A4- N1, 44 . . . . . . . . . . :SNSNS ...... 41 MISS �.N N. :SSNS,;�. NSA . i .; .; .; .; .; .; .; .; iM , lot i! 4t'. i! ............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ------ -- p at 1= W '•'•'..•'''' EMI Kkih 7177 L, b................... . . . . . . ...... q'.1p m,q "Q­ tl jj�� Ej (1 3: 1 M Trinity United Methodist Church Parcel Legal Description LOTA IN TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF THE EAST 7.38 CHAINS OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SEEGERS ROAD (EXCEPT THAT PART TH EREOF LYING NORTH OF THE PRESENT SOUTH LINE OF GOLF ROAD AND EXCEPT THAT PART TH EREOF DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT TH E POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF CHURCH ROAD 2.34 CHAINS; THENCE EAST 2.64 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 3.10 CHAINS TO THE CENTERLINE OF SEEGERS ROAD; THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD 2.78 CHAINS TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AS MEASURED ON THE EASTAND WEST LINES THEREOF, THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER) CONTAINING 4.50 ACRES MORE OR LESS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 12, 1971 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 21477051, IN COOK COUNTY, I LLI NOIS. Page 50 of 66 O W W W Q ¢ W Q��zOf m�Q ZQoOF- O or �zQ U)� Jam= ~ O O E: N 4 � ~ = Z V) = = W W W C)::f J Z~ O C-) U) O 00 ww� z =z ZvF- �Z Z�C) C)o w QZo �O C)w- I\ > D w0 U w U w C U Q C) wo U) o o � w w W O zCD U LLJ J CD 0- J Z U = W W O = z� W F LL. O U o`LLJ C:) C:)< U) w w LLJwr =� m W ZZCCD �� O� V)> = J- W O F- Z z U WLL. N � Z LL- W 0 Z= O O :m w w w 0 0 LLJV) w O 0 W> OJ = Q J U Z � Z = 0 Z = Q< J� � W W Z U Z Q= W Z U= U 00 W Z LLI � W 2 OW Z J� W J 0- C) � ~ pW�(~U =>O (~ U W w 0 O W U O new=3o UF- w LL. oQ cnwQ w U w O w O z 0 U 2 = O Q F- LL. F- w w ��z U.) ~z0 p w OO=Q�� =oz _ F- ~ = N ~ Q U � U� U =� p� 0 Z Z O P r Z 0 W Q Q LLI CD Q J W� ZO Z= CO o Q z F Q 2 O OW 0 0 a w w o - o' Oo w vO < m OfF-zmo =>=(D LLJ C) C) U U O m CU Q L�J J W Z O U)_ 5 W L.L. (_ m U 0 Q Ow 2 U z U')m z Q U w ~~ U LZ F- Q CDQ z w LLJ z CD ��U w� F-w� w 0 m O� wW wQ~ = LLI U N 0 Q= O W O~ D U)U 0 W OU � ZD LL-C)Q ~ � U w Z � U a_Q LL- w C) 0- W Z W = Z m U)-j wo >zw U-)��W T0 =Z� m p = m 0 U - C)LLJ J p Of LLJ U) LLJ =zZLLJ Qz�=�z C� vaw=Qw �� w w �� w U U� I LL. 0'Z U-)QUO o m 00 � Ow O � n � O Ups < m W N LLJ`O LZ= W ZOO N� mZ� �N U — LL-00 OQ � w Q W JLU Cl �Oo' C) WoQ QM- a0' Z =�U C) 00 Q(l) zci� m zoo c¢¢ C) Of ¢p Cl �ozULLJ wo �oov=Q C)CDLL. C) O w LLJ C:)o � ~ O W Cl= 00 z0 � w F J Z C� F J m w Jz zZ ww Z LL. Z z > Oa- Q �OwJ wQ m�w� ¢U Q Z Q U W �w ~O w=Qn wO �� a-� =� J (n�� UU -�� (nW LO I cn w U v- � O Q w LO z Li- O m w z w CD LW = z w cn wLLJ w = o w z _ < J m W O CY 0 0O U) aw zm J � Z Z W rn 0 O� g ~ Y p O Z I J Q pLLJ Z O O m U O O :m Z p > �I O Q O O p ui U p w U �¢ C)°° cn O INI) z ON � J � CD J o � � O O Q c� I c.� �n Q Q En Z Q op (~ O Z CDO (! Co J C) O 0w w (n o CDOf Z � N J a LL LL 0 LLJ t;E V LL. Lil U Lil Lil V) Li 0 Z Q Z LLJ In cry Lil w CL W C.9 J Cn Y z 0 J U J L.L. LL- O O w Z O Z v Z � Q 0 LLJ z (2L � p Q LLJ ryLLJ OC LLJ r)oo am 0Ln LJLJ 0 � � � WQ::� O v)W�p W w w wC� O Cr)� z=Cwn� �z zJ < cw~ C/') W w w w O� = U U O O W r z oo� wozCr) O �z �p CD wU C/�_ o z z �w—=Qo m ,���C,z O W� z w w o� U _ = �~z0~w O W = m z LL-oc��oo O z z z� Ln 0 n U z O < w o w z� W= W = U W N L-Lj CD ~ ry W = Q ~ n W LL-U rO0 �� mQz�cn z O= wzmzC�,� W O Q z C/') :2i = U mo w > O p = : W 0U00 ::E w= m U Q Cl)Q�xp�Q U=�wz0 cn Q a Cl() zpEQ m Q� V) m3�: Q U U p W O O� C�� C/)pQoLL- �wNO WN z� >z C�OW�W JQ oow�Qz=� cnw w~Wry Ow O U ry U W m CD W m z z W U W O = U � ULLJ � � W =C/) � W ry OLD � Q Cry= � � z ~ w � p� w~=U Cl_ z U U mm w O W O_ X Q w Q W z w�� ' N w � z p�LLJ= U� w mp�� <o w moo z z m� w� _,_,_,=o=off w� = F-- �UC/� pO z w W Q'- w O-1= U z Q z � O _ = O zJ ww = 0000 Cn Q0 = Q ...WU w W Q Uzz0 w Q �C~ 0 W z m Q W w ~ zao,r O Q� ~ Q r zQ�o� � U Cl) cc� V 40 to Elf � cm - Z O Q co II co I� "tr - LU cc co lz O � II II Q V m> aoc9 m Z> a—oc9 ry Q a � z � -- v) o 0 = W W CD� WaC/-) � Z CL CD cc a W Co W - co 0o ZZ O ots 2i ce q cl Cl) T ' co co � O LQ CD W Z w to �, a a w co co Z 0 II - II > Z II II W � > II > CQloc a cc MENEMZ cn m W m ME ME o . o � O O Re Re O O o @) @ co LW N to O Cl- N cm cc I Cl- p cc cc U) p 0 cl� 3: > v 0 a > > w - a a cn 0o - ao >- I.L. O I.I.. Q o L LL z J ' J J U')ccoo o LC) Lc)LLJ T Q T cn O O O O m m m a_ a a a (D Cl- T N CV) O O O z z z U) Oct � Q Q a CD z V) O U N O C)T- ■ Cp T O co LD II II CV � O � Za II 0 �„ W C) U)= C.) Z = O Z U) -O0 IOU C.) m 1�- C.) Z_ Z_ Cl) CI) m m LL�J Elf- .. Go� J a M J N� J�� CD vow � U T C cc a Z nj cc a T Z� N Z� co MENEM cc COD MENEM to a a N V A c cc o a N cc II II II 1�- II II II II > li-- II II II � aoc? aac? aoc? aac? aor ? O o "' z oc z z z p CD a c� m = v) - a m cn Oct m Ul W v) a m Elf El.- _ C.)pWo�� J co Z LLi co co m _ moN �oRe O Lo o) Lq oq = Uoaom r� z U) O = VoLo � M CQ � co W CAco T p co co co co � C44 p `Q Re CDCQ co co co co co co co co CMT co co T co co co co `Q Re T co to co to CL T O� = II Cl) Cr J ~ II II N O II II CO) O II II � O II > > H cc > H CC . > H cc W m cn II II > > � O II II H cc > Cn a��oc?? CL aoc? aoc?? aoc? LW w w O 0 LiJ GO O O 0 N N O O CV m c� a Ln T LL O LL J N ■ a O cc a S r (D w ~o U O zo z O �Q o� w w �- � w � cW �o w Q z =o �C/-) �o w w o0 z W m O U Q W Q m z o W � � m o o E O w m < LLJ mU-) O U �Q z cn w o 9::� � o C� CDw D c� ry � W -i Q m ME I w cn z 7 U CD o CD LL- z w o U w w w o z � w wLLJ Q Q z m � w j w O m = z Q n -icn Q � o w o Q z cr) w — � cry U Cry w w O w C/� C. m D w z z ElfQ o _ � �z w c�Q cry m o-w �Qw LLJ � cis z m z U � >- w � 0 Q LL- Q LLJ w cn w w � = IIIw Q m < � O U)o � z z> O z < Q� woo C/� w z O m w m m o m ~ O z oLi-i o U m� w w w III0 �o Qo ow 0 zmz Cry z w CD O w Co Q w m Q z m w m o w zQ Q w w � w Q� Q >CDcI r� QQ o 0 cry w Qo ozm m m�w� w U w Q w w U m L� W U) Q�U-) o z w w cn �zo—mow U=C�m o �Q ^z�cn -D n o _ W cj�-- Q m ~ Q Q Q= C o z U Cnw��Cn I w mw a � m U L Q w w LL- 0 0 z O � Q w w z cr) m�oj ��cr) m w�Qo O w�= Q w Q m U m Q U� w ~ O z o o III CD � < w� m o z- U) o o n o Q °°wo�c=OQwww � w= w w z w Q � CD mw z m�� z~ z z J �w�� w Lm�� z � C-) C/ Q o CD CD �wcl � Cj)wooi-J =Q� J�U)mz o QJJ�U Ci) W _ W � CD z � o ::D Q o C) CD C/, z zCD w CD Cl- Q z w w C) w w w F- m Cf) o w w__= w Q U Q z ��UUQQ U C/) ry m CDI-- Cl- N rl� Ln (-fl U--) U) I-- 00 07 � C/-) 0 0� tx o 0 t�o ca owP4 ~'1:40 a,Wa 00 wul 04w wP4 zo wIL) Ix off} a W w I.L U 9 (� Oz 3Q zIr v�� U a� w UFO ac ni a (n N z0LL 0::0 >—wM a. R to jC �2 Li I)O M_ x W J a C to z a. Z ao O O m Fz a)" 0 0 dint � MORR91 0 rw ull 04 in 0 • w LU z 0 z col■ IZ3 IUDI 0 o a ww m< < • co uj wi W< 0 L fz CL CL CL C) Z Z < cri uj Lai "W to Us -01 0 cc w to �E w uj = ezz m i'g U.-i < -c) �2 F- FOE z cr 0 0 LL Ul rc CL UJ z aw -1 U4 0 0 a. L=u twu uj z w <00 w z OL >W 11-0 >Zz Lm CL < a 0 28 6i p-m CLZZ <w U5 w it z L'4 I w W w w > GO v q 0 a.la 14 D U) *A z 0 lei z m w Z uj w z > Cf) CC 0 CL z 0 < 2 M OL z Z cc -0 CL < z U� l< :i w! 0 �e CC uj Z��� LU LU > w16vowof cn, Q) co LLJ y..Z :E < ir W ui < T 0 < (j) UJ W 0 0 0 w w U) o Z CL cc UJ < ol z p CQ i Ol w w w WC w Wpm CL � W C w M _ _ 0 � w � CL CL �UZ J UU ~ U U V' 0 J 0 � CL u LU U --i r?) T--1 3: CIE. < _j ILD LUV) � 0 0 w Z~= w F-�M: M:= J W F- 0 F- 2: LL F--1 LL LU u 0 0 1-q -j CL �> CL V) UF--1 LU J�~i1 00 ( ��1 1~ C� WOLW W J � F- < F CL re) LU se z l---1 0 3: 0 00 F- F-0 0 < �Z _ w _ 00 Z �le� w 0 w W� ~ W Ci] �~ w� Z F-~ 00 F- LULL Lf)o W ~ ALL J �', ~< ~ 0 0� �� � w w 0 <0 �w LL W 0 F- uw o = � LU F- ;I < EZ 1 2: LU Lf) LU LL �w W w ~ � 0 ~ < _ � ,� J � w J 00 C)cl) J � �Q z u 0 u (D Q�LLB J 0 � < < z W 2:C) 0 9 M c Z� � u _ o r LU 0 w LuF-El �C �0� Z V)Z - nr LU Z (D V) 3: u Z 0 L� —j LU 0 P� u ~D D 1-4 P Ln 2 W� u J rn w "J •� U t5 M 0Ln� 0� LU Zw J P U< =ce U w o u V) m�Lu <LU Z CL H M �� �� o LUCK m 0 0 U LLuZ �Z < ~� w.�Z Co< �_U DEC w 0 w�<<UO � , � w �� Lu w W C_0 Z J OLw w0 �� U D U C�a ZU� 0 0 < w0 w 7 Z CL Z� Zw <� w�Z WJ0 �W< P0W CL '-'u 0 IV) _ (D~ ww � 0 0 0 �U 0� LL -i�: � M �0Z w �0 Z .. H w3 ,IMP--lJ� J � CL� 0 0� Z o P Z u L WHOu<w W W W OL�� W U<C)O • ZOO JUZ w eo CL LU 2 U � ° � Z J �"� z Z� � Z 1--i J Z 0 W C)W<<Oc -r��J LLZ Zr P w ZZ _C)� WW<~<-i oo LL 0 < �� w J � UO�CLce wH<W J CL J Z�_ W= LU ~~ _ P- 4V) LU 0 U- LL � W Z FEE..0 W� W < a [-- 1--q L ur) in > Er) Z Z p C) M: CL Z Z LU P-1 0 w W Z� � W W U W Z W 0" J Z W J 1--4 Jce0ozoz OF-UWJ u� Z r LU w 0 -1 W m J � o CL LL J a � 0 LL w '"' Ix o f W W a U o 0 w 00 � LL W LL LL . U 0�~~P~~�W J=0 m BuzUW �� W �LLUO�<Uv) CaJOZ � J �� C� J 3:M3:5�oi-- U LU Z LL U0 >UW Z 0Lu ~ ww 2=�ZUOW LOM 1-4 P 0� OZ CL U < ~JI w 0❑Z� moz r °C W H W U W Z p CL 0 Lu < m I Lu �� W� � W � OLU 0 r 9 wLUw �b 0W! 0 CL Z Z Lu U W 1-4 i-i W Z U W r> W _j W w u W Jul-jLu _ Z� W W � W�ro W J LU 2 m CM) 0 .V) LLI ry - w a) -o am < C) E a) c L� C� cn C) o o (L) 4-1 V) LLJ_ ° E `(A° a� p J U U p 0-0 z -- N > w O N 70 CD-� a)O O U p L cv i CD > V) Q O = ° a) -° w � _r m c o �z o �� �� � w� >, cv-0 .�_ N� = o E . U -0 -j (A p a)70 Q O C� 7C3 U C:) Z Q m C a) -3: a> >) -- 7C3 >z7C3 o� -0� E C:O�° °m) �. Q:f W 0— 70L - � N u }, }, i _ +� N - CQ U -� LLJ m J N - U Q c i L 7C3 7C3i C,o Q _ co ow ��LLJ 0 ����o Q ° LLM ::D U� 4-0o �O� O 7� Qd U 'c� O co > LI-Q E cn v) > .� >p -E w z — a) 0 -0 � a W m� 0 0 � L cn Q O3: + Z > N -- . V O 0 C;dJ 0 a' cn O O Q z cn U 0 0 E a� w cn -- c� L O a� U a� w , U U�� �v)EE ��=�Qco���Uo�U(� (n C) INEEM uj Cm> r e 0 C) N L U V) +� U> +� - W N -iLd p W LOQ U Q c� U c� o ca U a) a) — a� U U ^Z Z -- J J Q a Q W a Z Q V) Q (, L n � Z O �_ W � _� 0 C) C U .0 LLI CDJCn 2� E ��.� NQ U Dear Jason Doland, I pray this letter finds you well and in grace. I wanted to share our worship attendance figures over the past three years. I believe these numbers reflect the trends that shape our worship life. Here are the attendance numbers from 2022 through 2024.0 • 2022 -150 (Including Online Attendance) • 2023 -100 (Excluding Online Attendance) • 2024 -11'7 (Excluding Online Attendance) All. supporting documents are attached to this letter. I want to sincerely thank you for your service. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me or the church office. Rev. dam Park Page 63 of 66 Church Membership Average Worship Attendance Trinity United Methodist church Mt. Prospect, IL #1049 Rev. Sam Park Membership * Aud*t I MembersWp& Attendance SupIMa�,,j,- 10/1, 192 191 ............. .... By Confession of Faith - 2 Jacque Quick. Pam Vazquez Transferred from another UMC - 6 Beverly Adam's, Jim Adams Jacki Hamilton, Dave Hamilton, Kim Hamilton Helen Sharp Removed From MemberLin Transferred to another UM C —2 Jennie Schumann Tom Weaver Death - 9 5/13/2024 Don Beelow 10/30/2023 C I aude Bjork 1/23/2024 Marcy Dub 11/13/2023 Gerald Farley 3/6/2024 Jan Froberg 11/12/2023 Doug Lattner 8/24/2024 Lois Mrzlack 3/10/2024 Joan Robertson 2/28/2024 Dorothy Sissors Page 64 of 66 R 4t 111 CL Al 1 C> CLI i C"; CL; 8 r E• v r. M ILL 4) OY > 0 Now 0 0 r CL 0 4-0 1 '6 0 AIR 01 r. I ICU 1, M r = i cu 01 (D CL CL r C13 E El 0 C 0 0 2 (D It CL c t 0 0 CIL CI Page 65 of 66 1. 1/22/22, 7:00 PM UMCNIC - Registration Northern Illinois Conference I The United Methodist Church Profile of the Local Church** This profile will be on file with the District Superintendent to expedite the appointment process, if and when necessary. The form should be filled out by the Staff/Pastor- Parish Relations Committee annually. District * Lake North Church * Mount Prospect: Trinity - 1049 Name of person submitting report Email of person submitting report ,Wendy Hardin Hermann p torwendy@trinitymp.org -Current church membership Average worship attendance 7525 Sunday school membership Sunday school average attendance D .. µ Worship Service times and styles Brief history of congregation Nov. 24,,1957: First organizing meeting with MP residents and the 10:30 Blended Worship D.S. Palm Sunday, 1958: First worship service May 18,1958: Church was chartered with 88 members, Donald Thomas appointed pastor July 29, 1958: property at 605 West Golf Road purchased --the first parsonage was on this property May 15,1960 Cornerstone laid for original sanctuary Sept 11 1960 First church service in the new building May 1972 Consecration of current sanctuary Education Wing was completed in 1963, and the Nursery Wing was completed in 2002 Trinity has a long history of missions, housing Journeys (PADS) clients, supporting local missions, relating to global missionaries, and more recently building relationships with Community Consolidated District 59. Trinity became a Reconciling Congregation in February 2020. A church -wide visioning process has occurred over the past few years, now coming to fruition The brief-history-of-congregation-1 78 field is required. Description of the congregation. (What brings it alive? Goals? How does the congregation feel about itself?) Our commitment to missions and hands-on service bring us alive. Music Ministry is widely participatory and involves a wide variety of types of music and skill levels. We care about one another deeply through prayer and tangible connection. Worship brings us together as a community. We are inspired to build relationships in the wider community, as we seek to live into the work of our visioning team. The description-of-the-congregation-what-brings-it-aii-1 79 field is required. What are your core values as a congregation? Faith, Compassion, Inclusive, Diversity, Curiosity, Relevant and Practial Faith, Community, What is the racial / ethnic / cultural diversity of the church and the community (who are your neighbors)? (include positives and challenges)* We are still primarily white and Caucasian as a congregation, but have a sigfinicatn presence of Filippino parishioners, some parishioner of African descent, and some Latinx families/members of famliies. Our surrounding community tends to reflect this, but also has a significant Spanish speaking population. We are an incredibly economically/racially/ethincally diverse community if you go 1 to 2 miles radius around the church. Trinity also has several committed Igbtq+ couples who are also leaders, and families with Igtbtq+ members as well. I What does the congregation need to accomplish in the next 5 years? #ut our oning process, we need to: 1. Continue to build upon our growing relationships within our wider community. OL We need to double our worship attendance in the next ten years. C,'. We need to find solid financial footing. J .. We need to empower and equip leaders and disciples In what ways do you envision the pastor helping the church reach these goals? * Through empowering leadership of Trinity members, through casting and clarifying vision for the future, through implementing goals of Team 2020. The in-what-ways-do-you-envision-the-pastor-helping-th-597 field is required. https://registratio-n.umenic.org/profile-of-the-local-church-2022 Page 66 0266