Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Res 05-25 02/04/2025 The Village Of Mount Prospect Authorizing The Adoption Of The Updated Of The Cook County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 5-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE UPDATE OF THE COOK COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within our community; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes the importance of reducing or eliminating vulnerability to disasters caused by natural hazards for the overall good and welfare of the community; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2000, the U.S. Congress passed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 ("Act") which provided the legal framework for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mitigation, planning requirements for state, local and tribal governments as a condition of mitigation grant assistance emphasizing the need for pre - disaster mitigation of potential hazards; and WHEREAS, as a condition of future funding for mitigation projects, the Act requires jurisdictions to prepare and adopt a hazard mitigation plan to identify and address certain vulnerabilities that exist prior to and during a disaster; and WHEREAS, FEMA supports pre- and post -disaster grant funding through the Hazard Mitigation Plan Grant program, which has as a condition of funding eligibility, a requirement for jurisdictions to prepare and adopt a hazard mitigation plan; and WHEREAS, to maintain continued eligibility for FEMA mitigation grant assistance programs the Act requires a hazard mitigation plan be updated every five years; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Act's requirements, 125 Cook County jurisdictions engaged in the FEMA -prescribed mitigation planning process to prepare the 2024 Plan and its associated local hazard mitigation plan annexes; and WHEREAS, the 2024 Plan has been approved by the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region V. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACTING PURSUANT TO ITS HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect hereby accepts, approves and adopts in its entirety, Volume 1, the Countywide Mitigation Actions in Volume 2; and the Village of Mount Prospect Jurisdictional Annex of Volume 2 of the 2024 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. SECTION T' That the Village of Mount Prospect will continue to participate in the updating and revision of the 2024 Plan with another plan review and revision to occur within a five-year cycle, and designated staff will provide annual progress reports on the status of implementation of the 2024 Plan to the Mayor and Board of Trustees. _SECTION THIREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: Dante, Filippone, Gens, Grossi, Saccotelli NAYS: None ABSENT: Matuszak PASSED and APPROVED this 4th day of February, 2025. ATTEST: Karen M. Agor nos Village Clerk N : p"s rre ffe ki r_1 JULY 20241 PUBLIC VERSION PREPARED FOR: nl�EMRS =" EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT REGIONALAND SECURITY Cook County Emergency Management and Regional Security 69 W. Washington St., Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Toni Preckwinkle President Cook County Board of Commissioners Theodore Berger Executive Director Cook County Emergency Management and Regional Security COOK COUNTY 2024 MJ=HMP VOLUME 1 ExecutiveSummary.............................................................................................................. 1 Part1. The Planning Process............................».............................................................. 8 Chapter1 Introduction ..................................... ......... ................... ... ..................................9 1.1 Why Prepare This Plan......................................................................................................9 1.2 Who Will Benefit from this Plan?.......................................................................................10 1.3 How to Use This Plan.....................................................................................................11 ChapterPlan Methodology....................................................................................................12 2.1 Grant Funding...............................................................................................................12 2.2 Formation of the Planning Team.....................................................................................12 2.3 Establishment of the Planning Partnership.....................................................................12 2.4 Defining the Planning Area.............................................................................................13 2.5 The Steering Committee................................................................................................13 2.6 Coordination with Other Agencies, Partners, and Neighboring Jurisdictions......................15 2.7 Local Jurisdiction Plan Participation...............................................................................19 2.8 Review of Existing Plans and Programs.......................................................................,.......27 2.9 Updates of Prior Plans ................................ ......................... ................... ... ........27 2.10 Public Involvement..............................................................„.........,.......,.....,....,..........28 2.11 Plan Development Chronology/Milestones...................................................................30 Part2. Risk Assessment...................................................»...»............................»...»». 31 Chapter 3 Identified Hazards of Cook County...........................................................................32 3.1 Identified Hazards of Concern........................................................................................32 3.2 Other Hazards of Interest (Human -caused and Technological Hazards)...........................33 3.3 Presidential Disaster (DR) & Emergency Declarations (EM) in Cook County.. ... _ ....... ....... 34 3.4 Risk Assessment Methodology.......................................................................................37 3.5 Overall Risk Scores........................................................................................................43 Chapter 4 Cook County Profile..................................................................................................45 4.1 Jurisdiction and Attractions............................................................................................46 4.2 Historical Overview..........................................................................................................47 4.3 Physical Setting.............................................................................................................49 4.4 Land Use.......................................................................................................................50 4.5 Population Data and Characteristics..............................................................................51 4.6 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure............................................................ .................... 68 4.7 Economy.......................................................................................................................70 4.8 Higher Education ..... .........................................,........ .....,............ ....,.,.................... 73 4.9 Transportation.............................................. ....................................................,..74 4.10 Housing and Living ........................................... ........ .................................,,.........7S 4.11 Future Trends in Development ......................... ........ .............................................76 4.12 Laws, Ordinances, Programs, and Plans......... ......................... ....-................... ,.,.......76 Chapter 5 Risk Assessment........................................ ............. 83 5.1 High Hazard Dams and Levees .......................... ...„ ........ ................., ,.......,,.......83 5.2 Drought................................................................................ .................................124 5.3 Earthquake ............. ......... ............................................... .................................139 5.4 Flooding................. ................... .................. ................... .................................16'9 5.5 Severe Weather........ ....................... ............. .................. ................... .............. 255 5.6 Severe Winter Weather ................. ......... ......... .........................,..........................3'34 5.7 Tornado................................ --....... ......................., .............................. ...............395 5.8 Wildfire........................................ ................ .,.,......,...410 5.9 Other Hazards of Concern ............................... .................. .................. ...............4"26 Part3. Mitigation Strategy................................................................................................468 Chapter 6 Mission, Goals, and Objectives .................. .................. ......... ........ .,............469 6.1 Mission............................................................ ....,..... ..., .......,................,,........469 6.2 Goals ............ ................... .......................... ....................................................469 6.3 Objectives.......................... , ........, ........, ..................., ....... .........,....,...........,........469 6.4 Community Lifelines........... ......... ......... ........................... ..................................470 Chapter 7 Mitigation Action Plan .. .................. ......... ... ....... ................,. ........,....,472. 7.1 Mitigation Strategy/Action Timeline Parameters............................................................473 7.2 Mitigation Strategy/Action Benefit Parameters...............................................................473 7.3 Mitigation Strategy/Action Estimated Cost Parameters.................................„.....,..........473 7.4 Mitigation Strategy/Action Prioritization Process ...........................................................473 Chapter 8 Mitigation Alternatives and Strategies....................................................................475 8.1 Mitigation Strategies by County or Regional Agencies/Departments ..............................478 8.2 Mitigation Strategies by Community.............................................................................4.78 8.3 NFIP-Specific Mitigation Actions and Implementation ...................................................478 Chapter 9 Plan Integration Strategy........................................................................,.........._......480 9.1 Process and Mechanism for Plan Integration....................................... ...........,...... ........ 480 9.2 Examples of Plan Integration........................................................................................4'81 Part 4. Plan Maintenance Strategy....................................................................................489 Chapter 10 Steering Committee............................................................................................490 iv Chapter 11 Plan Implementation..... ................. ................... .....,.......... ..,.,.........,..,...,...491 11.1 Formal Review Process...... .... --- ............ .......--- ... , ...... .....,............,.......491 11.2 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Assessing Plan Effectiveness .................................. .,....... 492 11.3 Annual Steering Committee Planning Meetings ................ ......4.,....... --- ...... .,........ ,,.492 Chapter 12 Annual Progress Report ..... ...................... ........... ..,..,, ..,,... ......494 Chapter 13 Plan Update Process............................................................................................497 13.1 Five -Year Action Plan ................................................... .......... ............... ......ww...,,,....... 497 Chapter 14 Continuing Public Involvement............................................................................500 Chapter 15 Incorporation into Other Planning Mechanisms ....................................................501 PartS. Plan Adoption....................................................................................................502 Appendices......................................................................................................................503 Appendix Acronyms and Definitions...........................................................................504 Appendix B Plan Process and Development...................................................................515 Appendix C Public Participation Documentation............................................................546 Appendix D Concepts, Methods and Data Sources Used for Hazard Mapping ..................629 Appendix E Annual Progress Report Template and Process ............................................632 Appendix F Jurisdictional Linkage Strategy....................................................................635 Appendix G Plan Adoption Resolution from Planning Partners ........................................642 iv VOLUME 1; PLANNING -AREA -WIDE ELEMENTS;' Hazard mitigation is the use of long-term and short-term policies, programs, projects, and other activities to alleviate the death, injury, and property damage that can result from a disaster. Cook County and a coalition of 125 municipal planning partners prepared and updated the 2024 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJ -HMP) in order to identify the risks posed by hazards and find ways to reduce their impacts. The plan reduces risk for those who live in, work in, and visit the County. Participating Partners and the Planning Area The responsibility for hazard mitigation lies with many, including private property owners, business and industry, and local, state, and federal government. Through multi -jurisdictional partnerships, local jurisdictions within an area with uniform risk exposure can pool resources and eliminate redundant planning activities. Cook County opened this planning effort to all municipalities within the County. Table: Planning Partners lists the partners that participated in the planning process and are covered under this plan. The planning area was defined as all incorporated and unincorporated areas of Cook County and the incorporated areas of cities that cross county boundaries. The planning area boundary is shown in the figure below (Figure: Planning Area). VOLUME 1: PLANNING -AREA -WIDE ELEMENTS The jurisdictions not participating in the 2024 MJ -HMP are border jurisdictions and are part of other county mitigation plans. Arlington Heights __ Bellwood Alsip Barrington _........_ Berkeley .............. Bedford Park ______ ........ Buffalo Grove ___ ...... Berwyn .................... . ........ ..... Blue Island Des Des Plaines ...................... . W W ... Broadview .__ _ ........ Bridgeview Elgin Brookfield ............... Burbank Elk Grove Village City of Chicago _..................... Burnham ......_._ Evanston _. _._._. Cicero ..................................................... Calumet City Glencoe . _......._.__ Countryside __..... ._..�_ Calumet Park Glenview ___....._ Elmwood Park . __....... Chicago Heights Golf ........ Forest Park Chicago Ridge Hanover Park _._. ........ .......� Forest View _. Country Club Hills Hoffman Estates Franklin Park ... .... ......... Crestwood ._..__- ....... Inverness Harwood Heights Dixmoor ... Kenilworth _._.__ ......W Hillside ._____ ..... Dolton __.........................-__ Lincolnwood Hodgkins .......... East Hazel Crest �_ _ ............................ Morton Grove _._._.._ _....___ Indian Head Park Evergreen Park Mount Prospect ..-_....... LaGrange .. Flossmoor Niles ..... LaGrange Park Ford Heights Northbrook ____.........._...WWW._ Lyons .__ ....... Glenwood ...... Northfield .................................. ..-__ ..............W Maywood ................-. Harvey Palatine _....... McCook ....................... Hazel Crest _._._._._ Park Ridge _.�...._ Melrose Park ........ Hickory Hills Prospect Heights Norridge Hometown ... Rolling Meadows __...... Northlake ...WWW_ _�__ .. ....... Homewood Schaumburg .................... North Riverside ................... Justice ........... Skokie �...._._..... _ .......... Oak Park .................... Lansing South Barrington � �................. � River Forest _ ........ Lemont Streamwood River Grove L Wheeling Riverside . ....._._ ............... .. Markham _........... .._ Wilmette .......__. Rosemont __ .......---------. Matteson _................_ Winnetka ......... Schiller Park ..........WWW Merrionette Park l airiruntorn I1--IiRs (Not Stickney _.................. Midlothian P<rrt` cipatin in 2024 Cook County MJ HPIP) ......W-.... Bairtictt (NotParticii:)atingin Stone Park . ............. ..__ . Oak Forest ?MM24 Cook County Ml..E-NPIP) ............................. Deer iid: Ld (N¢ rPar6cpa6ngin Summit ........................... Oak Lawn 024 Cook County MJ f im):,) Plan Development and Organization The 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP was updated by a planning team of Cook County Department of Emergency Management and Regional Security staff and expert consultants, with guidance from a steering committee representing the planning partners and other local stakeholders. The key steps in updating the plan were as follows: 1. Determine the Planning Area and Resources 2. Build and Reconvene the Planning Team 3. Outreach Strategy 4. Review and Update Community Capabilities S. Update and Conduct the Risk Assessment 6. Update the Mitigation Strategy 7. Keep the Plan Current 4 Deer ................... _ Westchester .......... ..... Olympia Fields 2024 Cook C'ountV P114 MI) ........ ............_ __..._ _..._.._. fest Dundee (Not Western Springs Orland Hills Paotac.pp:'irat ng in 2024 Cook C:.carra"rky r�2.9..t..IMP)) _..........._ ......... 118os0,e (nror.Partic oaatingin Bensenville (Not.s'uafticp atrn nn Orland Park 2024 Co(:)k G.;ou(;tVP?s..P pP4P) .2024 Cook County PRd..P-PPRP) Buwulrlr Vidge (rvoreyaMicap i.gtpngin Palos Heights 2024 Cook Cow iV y AIJ-P 04P) ....�...... .,_.. - ......... _..... ......�.�......._.-.. ...... ......... ........ V U.rn hu rs (NotPartiQ rp atingin2024 � Palos Hills Cook Cr atnV.7e MJ.111'41') iiinsdale (NotPartcdpuabngin 2024 Palos Park Co)k CoupetyE�P'..9 MFM) .. .__.�. ._....m ...�. - ............ ........ .�.._._..�. OavOakIlso cok (NotPait¢c, patingin Park Forest 2024 Coop; CouMy Pit HA?!') ..�.. .... _. Phoenix ............ . ..... ........... _. _... Posen ...... ......... __..._ Richton Park Riverdale Robbins _...,.,_ . �., _ ..... .. ....... ................ Sauk Village ............. ._ ..... South Chicago Heights South Holland ................ .......... _ ....... .......... Steger Thornton _ _.... ....... ..... Tinley Park University Park ............. .-........ . Willow Springs ............ _.......... .. ....._.m......... � __ W ....._. � _. Worth ......... U Ira nkfclrt (Not Participabng up 2024 Cook County ^?l -C- M11) _..... . .......... .._._.. ....... Woodlrudge(PVotPaiticopar¢'ngh,P2024Cook County MJ -HMP) Plan Development and Organization The 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP was updated by a planning team of Cook County Department of Emergency Management and Regional Security staff and expert consultants, with guidance from a steering committee representing the planning partners and other local stakeholders. The key steps in updating the plan were as follows: 1. Determine the Planning Area and Resources 2. Build and Reconvene the Planning Team 3. Outreach Strategy 4. Review and Update Community Capabilities S. Update and Conduct the Risk Assessment 6. Update the Mitigation Strategy 7. Keep the Plan Current 4 VOLUME 1: PLANNING -AREA -WIDE ELEMENTS 8. Review and Adopt the Plan 9. Create a Safe and Resilient Community The final plan consists of two volumes. Volume 1 includes all federally required elements of a disaster mitigation plan that apply to the entire planning area. Volume 2 consists of all federally required jurisdiction -specific elements in individual annexes for each participating jurisdiction. Mission Goals and Objectives The defined mission for the 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP is to "Identify risks and sustainable, cost- effective actions to mitigate the impact of natural hazards to protect the life, health, safety, welfare, and economy of the communities of Cook County." Mitigation goals were established as follows: 1. Develop and implement sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally sound risk - reduction (mitigation) projects. 2. Protect the lives, health, safety, and property of Cook County residents from natural hazards. 3. Protect public services and critical facilities, including infrastructure, from loss of use during natural hazard events and potential damage from such activities. 4. Involve stakeholders to enhance the local capacity to mitigate, prepare for, and respond to the impacts of natural hazards. 5. Develop, promote, and integrate mitigation action plans. 6. Promote public understanding of and support for hazard mitigation. Thirteen objectives were established for the plan to meet multiple goals and serve as stand-alone measurements of the effectiveness of the mitigation action. Proposed mitigation actions were evaluated in part based on how many goals and objectives they would help to fulfill. 1. Eliminate or minimize disruption of local government operations caused by natural hazards through all phases of emergency management. 2. Increase the resilience of (or protect and maintain) infrastructure and critical facilities. 3. Consider the impacts of natural hazards on future land uses in the planning area, including possible impacts from climate change. 4. Integrate hazard mitigation policies into land use plans in the planning area. 5. Develop, improve, and protect systems that provide early warnings, emergency response communications, and evacuation procedures. 6. Use the best available data, science and technologies to educate the public and to improve understanding of the location and potential impacts of natural hazards, the vulnerability of building types and community development patterns, and the measures needed to protect Life safety. 7. Retrofit, purchase, or relocate structures in high -hazard areas, including those known to be repetitively damaged. 8. Establish partnerships among all levels of local government, the private sector, and/or nongovernmental organizations to improve and implement methods to protect people, including underserved and underrepresented groups, and property. 9. Provide or improve flood protection on a watershed basis with flood control structures and drainage maintenance plans. 10. Strengthen codes and land use planning and their enforcement so that new construction or redevelopment can avoid or withstand the impacts of natural hazards. VOLUME 1: PLANNING -AREA -WIDE ELEMENTS 11. Encourage mitigation through incentive -based programs like the Community Rating System and Storm Ready programs. 12. Reduce natural hazard -related risks and vulnerabilityto potentially isolated and underserved populations within the planning area and ensure mitigation strategies result in equitable outcomes. 13. Encourage hazard mitigation measures that have the least adverse effect on the natural environment and use natural processes. Detailed risk assessments were performed for each of these hazards of concern. Also, a brief qualitative review was conducted of technological and human -caused hazards of interest. Climate Change was addressed for each hazard, as applicable. Risk Assessment Methodology The risk assessments of the identified hazards of concern describe the risks associated with each hazard. The following steps were used to define the risk of each hazard: • Profile and update each hazard, describing the geographic area it affects, its frequency and severity, and the warning time provided before a hazard event occurs. • Use maps of hazard impact areas, as appropriate, to determine and update the number of structures, facilities, and systems exposed to each hazard. • Assess the vulnerability of exposed structures and infrastructure based on exposure and the probability of occurrence of a hazard event. Tools such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) hazard -modeling program HAZUS-MH were used to perform an assessment for flood and earthquake. Profiles of Cook County Natural Hazards The following natural hazards are addressed in the 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP. For a more detailed analysis of each hazard, please refer to Part 2. Risk Assessment. • Dam/levee failure o Dam Failure o Levee Failure • Drought • Earthquake • Flood o Riverine Flooding o Urban Flooding o Coastal Flooding • Seiche • Coastal Erosion • Severe Summer Storms o Extreme Heat o Lightning o Hail o Fog C VOLUME 1: PLANNING -AREA -WIDE ELEMENTS o High Winds Severe Winter Storms o Snow o Blizzards o Ice Storms o Extreme Cold and Wind Chill • Tornado • Wildfire VOLUME 2: MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact ._....-._-_..... _._ Primary Point of Contact ........... Alternate Point of Contact Matthew Lawrie, Village Engineer I Jim Miller, Emergency Management 1700 West Central Road Coordinator Mount Prospect, IL 60056 111 E. Rand Road Telephone: 847-870-5640 Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Email Address: Telephone: 847-818-5660 mlawrie@mountprospect.org Email Address: jmiLler@mountprospect.org Jurisdiction Profile The following is a summary of key information about the jurisdiction and its history: Date of Incorporation: 1917 Current Population: The 2020 U.S. Census population was 56,852. The 2022 U.S. Census estimate indicated the population was 54,843. Population Growth: The overall population has increased by 1.19% between 2018 and 2022. Location and Description: The Village of Mount Prospect is a suburb 22 miles northwest from downtown Chicago. It is bordered by Prospect Heights to the north, 1-90 and Elk Grove Village to the south, Des Plaines to the east and Arlington Heights to the west. The center of town is at the intersection of US Route 14 and Illinois Route 83. The Union Pacific Northwest rail lines run through the center of town. There is a Metra train station at 11 E Northwest Hwy. Mount Prospect has a land area of 10.37 square miles. Brief History: The original inhabitants of the area that encompasses Mount Prospect today were Native Americans. Yankees were the first American settlers to the area, but they were the second group. German immigrants had the most significant impact in terms of population and cultural traditions. In 1850, the train rolled into town. This led to an increasing specialization in the farming community. Not Long after the train station was built, others began building stores and houses downtown and made the Village of Mount Prospect come to life. In 1917, Mount Prospect reached a population of 300 and was incorporated. From there, the largest growth came during land speculations in the 1920s and then the suburban movements that followed World War II. The baby boom expanded the population and the Village began expanding the services it offered. In the early 1960s, the business community in Mount Prospect took a leap forward with the construction of Randhurst, the first indoor air-conditioned mall in the upper Midwest. Another major event was the development of Kensington Business Center, which has been the home to national and international firms including NTN Bearing, Searle, Braun Manufacturing Cummins -Allison Corp., and ITT Technical Institute. In the 1990s and 2000s attention was turned to downtown redevelopment. Climate: Mount Prospect's climate is typical of suburban Chicago and the Midwest in general. Average rainfall is 32 inches per year and average snowfall is 24 inches. The average year round temperature is 48.2 degrees. In July the average high temperature is 83 degrees and in January the average low temperature is 11 degrees. The average humidity is 72.27% Governing Body Format: The Village of Mount Prospect is governed by a Village President and a 6 member Board of Trustees. This body will assume the responsibility for the adoption and implementation of this plan. The Village consists of six departments: Community Development, Finance, Human Services, Fire, Police and Public Works. The Village has 12 committees and commissions that report to the Village Board. Development Trends: The Village continues to see significant development activity in the commercial sector including the recent redevelopment of Randhurst Village (1,000,000 square foot regional center), expansion efforts by national retailers such as Walmart and Menards, and the refurbishing of Mount Prospect Plaza (300,000 square feet). The industrial/office sector has not increased development but United Airlines and CVS/Caremark recently constructed two large facilities in the Village. UAL constructed a 200,000 square foot data center that will serve their entire international operations. CVS occupied a 175,000 square foot facility to operate their mail order prescription services. After a 5 -year lull in residential construction activity, the Village has issued permits for two multi -family projects in the downtown district. In addition, a 92 -unit senior independent living facility is under construction and is scheduled to be complete by mid -2014. As of 2019, there are many current projects in Mount Prospect including 2 senior housing developments, gas station, industrial and commercial development, rowhomes and luxury apartments. Changes in Community Priorities: There have been no significant changes in priority regarding the hazards that could potentially impact the community or changes in priority regarding resilience. Capability Assessment The assessment of the jurisdiction's legal and regulatory capabilities is presented in the Legal and Regulatory Capability Table below. The assessment of the jurisdiction's fiscal capabilities is presented in the Fiscal Capability Table below. The assessment of the jurisdiction's administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Administrative and Technical Capability Table below. Information on the community's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in the National Flood Insurance Program Compliance Table below. Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in the Community Classifications Table below. .............. .........................._ .................. TABLE: LEGAL AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY Federal Jurisdictional Co ,...m Local State or Other State Authority Mandated omments Authority ProhibiUons .... . Codes, Ordinances & Requirements Building Code Yes No No Yes Chapter 21, ......... ;013 ........___._. K „w. ......._. ......... Zonings Yes No No Yes Chapter 14, ................_.... _. 1993 Chapter 15, Subdivisions Yes No No No 2002 State regulates industrial activity from Construction Stormwater Yes No Yes Yes sites 1 acre or Management larger under section 402 CWA. Chapter 16, 2002 Post Disaster No No No No Recovery (765 1LCS 77/) Residential Real Estate Real Property Disclosure Yes No Yes Yes Disclosure Act. Chapter 8, 2001 ........... .... ....................... Growth No No No No Management Site Plan Yes No No No Chapter 15, Review 2002 .......� .,,�.� ............. Public Health Yes No No No Chapter 19, and Safety 1957 Environmental Yes No No No Chapter 16, Protection 2002 Planning Documents General or Comprehensive Yes No No No Plan Yes, plan include land Is the plan equipped to provide integration to this mitigation plan? use and redevelopment components. Floodplain orYes No No No 9/20/2011 Basin Plan ............... __ _ _. . _.... _........... .... Regional stormwater impacts are managed by MWRD. The Stormwater Yes No Yes No Village lies Plan within the Des Plaines River watershed planning area of MWRD's ......... _-.- .... comprehensive Stormwater Master Planning Program 12/9/2006 Capital Improvement Yes No No No 7/16/13 - 5 year Plan CIP Water and sanitary sewers, flood What types of capital facilities'does the plan address? control, streets, public buildings and equipment. How often is the plan revised//updated? Annually` Habitat Conservation No No No No Plan �._.. ......... The Economic Development Commission is charged with reviewing all economic development Economic related Development Yes No Yes Yes programs and Plan incentives including tax incentives offered through the Cook County 6b program. 6/5/07 Shoreline Management No No No No Plan Response/Recovery Planning ........ Comprehensive �. _........_ Emergency No No Yes Yes Cook County Management EMRS Plan Threat and Hazard Cook County Identification No No Yes No EMRS and Risk Preparing Assessment ........_ THIRA Terrorism Plan No No Yes Yes Cook County EMRS __ ...... TABLE: ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL mom= Post -Disaster No No No W._ .............. _ No Recovery Plan Department/Agency/Position Continuityof Cook County Operations No No Yes No EMRS Plan __...._, Public Health I_..........__........ No No Yes Cook County No Plans DPH __ ...... TABLE: ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL ......... CAPABILITY _ _.............. _ ......... Staff/Personnel Resources Available? Department/Agency/Position .... .... ....- Planners or engineers with Community Development/ Director Public knowledge of land development Yes Works/ Village Engineer and land management practices Engineers or professionals trained Public Works/ Village Engineer in building or infrastructure Yes Community Development/ Building construction practices Commissioner _...... ...... ..........� _................. Planners or engineers with an Yes Public Works/ Village Engineer understanding of natural hazards Staff with training in benefit/cost Yes Finance Department/Director analysis SurveyorsNo _............ ....... _........ Personnel skilled or trained in GIS Yes " Cook County GIS Consortium applications ........._ _. Scientist familiar with natural No hazards in Local area Emergency manager Yes Fire Department/ Fire Chief Grant writers _ Yes ` Comm... unity Development/ Director VOLUME 2: MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES Maintaining compliance under the NFIP is an important component of flood risk reduction. All planning partners that participate in the NFIP have identified actions to maintain their compliance and good standing. Cook County entered the NFIP on April 15, 1981. Structures permitted or built in the County before then are called "pre -FIRM" structures, and structures built afterwards are called "post -FIRM." The insurance rate is different for the two types of structures. The effective date for the current countywide FIRM is August 19, 2008. This map is a DFIRM (digitalflood insurance rate map). The communities in Cook Countythat participate in the NFIP are shown in Table: NFIP Participating Communities in Cook County in Volume I of the Cook County MJ -HMP. The NFIP makes federally -backed flood insurance available to homeowners, renters, and business owners in participating communities. The communities in Cook County that participate in the NFIP and their "Policies in Force; "'Total Coverage," and "Total Written Premiums" are shown in Table: Cook County Flood Insurance Policies in Volume I of the Cook County MJ -HMP. The following are NFIP-related activities completed by our community: • Our staff provide the following services: permit reviews, GIS, inspections, engineering capability. • My community teaches property owners or other stakeholders about the importance of flood insurance through public outreach events, workshops, and/or seminars. • Our community enforces local floodplain regulations and monitors compliance. • Our floodplain development regulations meet or exceed Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or State minimum requirements. • Mount Prospect holds an Emergency Management expo to discuss flood insurance on an annual basis. Saba-ta.ntia. ( .cakye. w n+l a f . $.0stantia10 amage-Rale The IDNR/OWR has developed a model ordinance for floodplain management, which has been adopted by most communities in Illinois. The ordinance includes the minimum requirements an NFIP participating jurisdiction must adopt and enforce, as well as additional higher regulatory requirements. The optional, higher regulatory standards include a minimum one foot of freeboard L^' DLl1MF 2- MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL above the base flood elevation and cumulative tracking of damage repairs and improvements to establish substantial damage and substantial improvement compliance. Some jurisdictions have chosen to exceed the requirements of the model ordinance and have adopted more restrictive ordinances. This is most common in the communities in northeastern Illinois. Existing Municipal Code: 22-102 Definitions SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT: Any repair, reconstruction or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the market value of the structure either: a) before the improvement or repair is started, or b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred. This term includes structures which were damaged whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its predamaged condition would equal or exceed fifty percent (50%) of the market value before the damage occurred, regardless of the actual repair work performed. For the purposes of this definition "substantial improvement" is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not, however, include either: a) any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure safe living conditions; or b) any alteration of a "historic structure", provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure". (Ord. 5253, 5-21-2002; amd. Ord. 5620, 4-3-2007; Ord. 5702, 7-15-2008) 22-109 Permitting Requirements Applicable to All Floodplain Areas In addition to the requirements found in sections 22.106, 22.107 and 22.108 of this article, for development in flood fringes, regulatory floodways, and SFHAs or floodplains where no floodways have been identified (zone A, AO, AH, AE, Al -A30, A99, VO, V1-30, VE, V, M or E) the following requirements shall be met: C. Protecting Buildings: All buildings located within a 100 -year floodplain also known as an SFHA, shall be protected from flood damage below the flood protection elevation. However, existing buildings located within a regulatory floodway shall also meet the more restrictive appropriate use standards included in section 22.10.7,of this article. This building protection criteria applies to the following situation: Construction or placement of a new building; Nonconforming structures may remain in use, but shall not be enlarged or substantially improved, unless the improvements include measures to bring the structure into compliance with this article; Installing a manufactured home on a new site or a new manufactured home on an existing site. This building protection requirement does not applyto returning a mobile home to the same site it lawfully occupied before it was removed to avoid flood damage; and Installing a travel trailer on a site for more than one hundred eighty (180) days. This building protection requirement may be met by one of the following methods: 7 I I INNER am 1. A residential or nonresidential building, when allowed, may be constructed on permanent land fill in accordance with the following: a. The lowest floor, (including basement) shall be a minimum of two feet (2') above the base flood elevation; Ill The fill shall be placed in layers no greater than one foot (1') deep before compaction and should extend at least ten feet (10') beyond the foundation of the building before sloping below the flood protection elevation. The top of the fill shall be above the flood protection elevation. However, the ten foot (10') minimum may be waived if a structural engineer certifies an alternative method to protect the building from damages due to hydrostatic pressures. The fill shall be protected against erosion and scour. The fill shall not adversely affect the flow of surface drainage from or onto neighboring properties. The design of the fill or fill standard must be approved by a registered engineer. 2. A residential or nonresidential building may be elevated in accordance with the following: a. The building or improvements shall be elevated on crawl space, stilts, piles, walls, or other foundation that is permanently open to floodwaters and not subject to damage by hydrostatic pressures of the base flood or 100 -year frequency flood. The permanent openings shall be no more than one foot (1') above grade, and consist of a minimum of two (2) openings. The openings must have a total net area of not less than one square inch for every one square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding below the base flood elevation; b. The foundation and supporting members shall be anchored and aligned in relation to flood flows and adjoining structures so as to minimize exposure to known hydrodynamic forces such as current, waves, ice and floating debris; c. All areas below the flood protection elevation shall be constructed of materials resistant to flood damage. The lowestfloor (including basement) and all electrical, heating, ventilating, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and utility meters shall be located a minimum of two feet (2') above the flood protection elevation. Water and sewer pipes, electrical and telephone lines, submersible pumps, and other waterproofed service facilities may be located below the flood protection elevation; d. The areas below the flood protection elevation may only be used for the parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement. When the buildingwall encloses open space that is below the base flood elevation, gravity storm and sanitary sewer connections are specifically prohibited and overhead sewers are required for the sanitary connections and sumps for the storm sewer connections; e. Manufactured homes shall be anchored to resist flotation, collapse, or lateral movement by being tied down in accordance with the rules and regulations for the Illinois mobile home tie down act issued pursuant to 77 Illinois administrative code. In addition, all manufactured homes shall meet the following elevation requirements: (1) In case of manufactured homes placed or substantially improved: a) outside of manufactured home park or subdivision, b) in a new manufactured home park or subdivision, c) in an expansion to 8 VOLUME 2 MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, or d) in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on which a manufactured home has incurred substantial damage from a flood, the top of the lowest floor shall be elevated to or above the flood protection elevation; (2) In the case of manufactured homes placed or substantially improved in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, the manufactured home shall be elevated so that either the top of the Lowest floor is above the base flood elevation or the chassis is at least thirty six inches (36") in height above grade and supported by reinforced piers or other foundations of equivalent strength, whichever is less; Their ordinance did not include substantial damage rule provisions; future updates will consider inclusion of these rules as applicable and as appropriate. mp�arnNt�s_tµ.�I_t� Irr��a�±....Op�b�l�tMes� At this time, the municipality did not include or identify any opportunities to expand and improve capabilities. Plans will be updated in the future should this change. The capability assessment describes opportunities to "link" or integrate the mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms. The process and mechanism to identify opportunities to integrate the Cook County MJ -HMP into other planning mechanisms will occur during the Annual Update Process and be reflected in the Jurisdictional Annual Report each year. Specific plan integration opportunities will include: The hazards, goals, and actions of the Hazard Mitigation Plan will be considered in the next update of the Comprehensive Plan. Emergency Plan Integration: Cook County EMRS is supporting communities to develop and update their respective Emergency Operations Plans, Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Government Plan, and Recovery Plan in 2024. This is an ongoing countywide initiative and is being implemented in all municipalities. Emerge 0ey, O.p. reti ns.P n -(POP). An EOP template was created for all municipalities. The 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP and the hazards in the mitigation plan have been integrated into the Situation and Assumptions section of the EOP. Within that section, the natural hazards based on the 2019 MJ -HMP were added in the Initial Analysis IN VOLUME 2: MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES and Assessment and Identification of Hazards section of the EOP. The hazards in the 2019 plan and the 2024 MJ -HMP did not change apart from adding wildfires for the Forest Preserve and unincorporated areas of the County. Future updates of the EOP will take into consideration any additional new natural hazards that are added to subsequent updates to the MJ -HMP. Conti nuity f_ p..rati.oi_I PL .n (_C.0. P) The Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) for the municipality includes a Situation section that is based on the 2019 Cook County MJ-HMPiurisdictional annex, and specificallythe hazards identified in the annex. The COOP -specific risk assessment is hazard -specific and based on likelihood of occurrence and severity of impact. Recovery Plan The goals of the Recovery Plan were developed to align with the 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP, and specifically prioritizes the responsibility of officials under this plan to save lives, protect property, relieve human suffering, sustain survivors, repair essentialfacilities, restore services, and protectthe environment. The plan acknowledges that hazard mitigation is an important priority and consideration during the rebuilding process. Jurisdiction -Specific Natural Hazard Event History The information provided belowwas solicited from the jurisdiction and supported by NOAA and other relevant data sources. The Natural Hazard Events Table lists all past occurrences of natural hazards within the jurisdiction,. Repetitive flood loss records areas follows: • Number of FEMA -Identified Repetitive Loss Properties: 5 (5 Single Family) • Number of FEMA -Identified Severe Repetitive Loss Properties: 3 (3 Single Family) • Number of Repetitive Flood Loss/Severe Repetitive Loss Properties That Have Been Mitigated: 1 Federal Disasters Declared 10 DR -227 4/25/1967 Tornado DR -351 9/4/1972 Flood _..... __........ DR -373 ._.__............ 4/26/1973 ......... ....... .......... Flood .. DR 509 _ 6/18/1976 ... _......_ Severe Storm(s) DR 643 6/30/1981 Severe Storm(s) DR -776 ........ ......._ 10/7/1986 _. Flood DR -798 �............ ..�............. 8/21/1987 ........ Flood ........... DR -997 .......__ _........ 7/9/1993 _ �_ ..... Flood DR -1 129 ....._ 7/2 5/1996 _... _..... Severe Storms) _.. _ DR -1188 9/17/1997 ..... .-....... Severe Storm(s) DR -1729 __.. ........... 9/25/2007 ___ _. ................... Severe Storm(s) DR -1800 10/3/2008 .. m ..................... Severe Storm(s) DR -193 5 8/19/2010 ..........___ ......... Severe Storm(s) 10 State Disaster Declarations .. -a -. T- 7/26/2010 DR -19603/17/2011 .... _.._.... 3/17/2011 ....... _._. -.. Snow ..... ... EM 3068 .. 1/16/1979 . Snow EM -3134 �....... ........ 1/8/1999 Snow EM -3161 1/17/2001 Snow ........ _. _....... ..... EM -3230 ........... ............ 9/7/2005 Hurricane —Katrina Evacuation ..... .. ......... _.._. EM -3435_3/13/2020 Biological DR -4116 _ ..... 5/10/2013 - FloodIT _._.._.._.. DR -44893/26/2020 ...........m._._. — Biological DR -4728 8/15/2023 Seve_. re Storms) DR -4749 11 /20/2023Flood monthly) State Disaster Declarations .. -a -. T- 7/26/2010 Severe Storms, High Winds, Torrential Rain 1 /31 /2011Winter Weather .. ..... .... ....... _. .................... _ 4/25/2011 _......... ...... High Wind, Tornadoes, Torrential Rain 5/25/2011 _._........._ ... __.... .... .................... 4/18/2013 ._.. _.— ........... Severe Storms, Heavy Rainfall, Flooding, Straight-line Winds 4/20/2013 4/21/2013 4/25/2013 4/30/2013 1/6/2014. Heavy Snowfall, Frigid Temperatures _... 7/12/2017 W_ ......_.�. _ Thunderstorms, Heavy Rainfall, Flooding 7/14/2017 1/29/2019 Winter Storm .......... ............... 2/6/2020 Severe Storms 3/12/2020 present (reissued COVID-19 monthly) 2/16/2021 Winter Storms 2/1/2022 Winter Storms 8/1/2022 Monkeypox (reissued monthlythrough 10/28/2022) 11 ill ill illis 111 1 ........., building on fire the ;. , morning of April� " Wind 7/19/2013 µ .. Flood DR-4116 _.. 4/18/2013 $240,000 Flood 7/23/2011 - Wind - 7/11/2011 $380,000 _ ........ Tornado -' 6/21/2011 Winter Storm DR-1960 2/1/2011 $200,000 Flood DR-1800' ..........._... 9/13/2008 - Flood _... .._.......... 5/22/2008 . Flood/Wind DR-1729 _...__.. ___.__M .... 8/23/2007 $1,210,000 Wind _ � ITITITITITITITITITIT 8/1 /2003 ...�......... � � Wind �__.. � ..... 7/21/2003 _.� �. Wind .... ..... ..... ......... 5/11/2003 . ..................................... ..........._ As the line i thunderstorms moved east into northeast Illinois, a bolt of lightning struck a tree in Mount Prospect. The tree exploded into thousands of pieces, some of which were 3 to 5 Lightning and Severe feet long. One of these Weather 1 /22/2002 large pieces struck a woman walking her dog. Although she was critically injured, she recovered from her injuries. The flying pieces` of the tree broke 3 windows and damaged garage doors and siding. Wind 6/12/2001 - Winter Storm 12/11/2000 13.5 inches of snow at _ Mount Prospect Wind - 8/6/2000 - ................- Wind - .... .............. 5/18/2000 Wind4/10/2000 _ - ..__ ...W__ Wind ......... ...... 11/10/1998 �_. ...._......... ..., ,, Wind .__._._._._._._. .. 8/24/1998 ......... .._.__ Wind 5/28/1998 - _. _...... - Wind - ' ........ ........ 9/29/1997 - ......... .-...�. Wind l ..... 10/29/1996 - WinterStorm/Snow .........__,.-� . 12/1994 _ Winter Storm/Ice - 1/1994 - Wind - ° 8/30/1993 - Wind 7/2/1992 - Wind - 6/17/1992 mm Flood -" 8/1987 Flood DR-776 10/1986 12 VOLUME 2 'MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES J urfad_i ki n.- S, po c lfI..H : 4� ttae,sl a mesa iwr q k Hazards that represent a county -wide risk are addressed in the Risk Assessment section of the 2024 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. This section only addresses the hazards and their associated impacts that are relevant and unique to the municipality. Dam/Levee Failure: Levee 37- Is located along River Rd between Euclid Ave and Palatine Rd. There is the potential for failure of levee wall and pump system. The northeast section of our community is mostvulnerable if a failure would occur. Levee 37 protects 300 homes, River Rd., and the surrounding Local roads. Earthquake: Mount Prospect has Fuel Tank Farm located north of Oakton St. east of Busse Rd. The tank farm serves Ohare airport and surrounding areas. Flood: We experience localized flooding throughout the Village, especially in the unincorporated subdivision, Forest River, near Kensington and River Roads underthejurisdiction of Cook County and Wheeling Township (but Mount Prospect Fire Dept. responds to emergencies). In particular, the Des Plains River flooding limits our ability to evacuate and receive resources from the East. Levee 37- Is Located along River Rd between Euclid Ave and Palatine Rd. There is the potential for failure of levee wall and pump system. The northeast section of our community is most vulnerable if a failure would occur. Levee 37 protects 300 homes, River Rd., and the surrounding local roads. Tornado and High Winds: Wind events are prevalent in the area and our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Mount Prospect has Fuel Tank Farm located north of Oakton St. east of Busse Rd. The tankfarm serves Ohare airport and surrounding areas. Snow: Our overhead power lines are vulnerable. ° ,t1 i rl utatlsoi1Ai_ „ .yaa,rs m olden and this population has an increased vulnerability to extreme weather, particularly winter storms. Blizzards: Our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Ice Storms: Our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Severe Weather: Mount Prospect has Fuel Tank Farm located north of Oakton St. east of Busse Rd. The tank farm serves Ohare airport and surrounding areas. Severe Winter Weather. Mount Prospect has Fuel Tank Farm located north of Oakton St. east of Busse Rd. The tankfarm serves Ohare airport and surrounding areas. �(ii{1 rir 1 �. �!� �. I� 1 d�� '1��� / �.� �i. ,S ,:,. Families in poverty 931 3.7% People with disabilities __ .._. .._. ._....... 9,214 9.9% __.........._ People over 65 years 17,647 18.9% People under 5years _. 6,493 _ 6.9% _.... . _.......__........_ People of color .. ......._� 31,705 ..........._ 33.9% _. _.... Black 3,387 _... 3.6% _..._ ....._ ............... .............. Native American457 0.5% .. _. ..... ......... Hispanic13,865 ._..... .. ........ 14.8% _.. ........._ Difficulty with English 6,550 7.5/0a Households with no car 1,705 4.6% Mobile homes 351 1% Data are from the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey. See methods for more information. The community evaluated whether vulnerability, and subsequently the potential impacts, in hazard - prone areas had increased, decreased, or remained the same for each natural hazard identified in this Hazard Mitigation Plan. Climate change, infrastructure expansion, and economic shifts that can 13 VOLUME 2`: MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES affect vulnerability were considered. For example, if planned development is in an identified hazard area or is not built to the updated building codes, it may increase the community's vulnerability to future hazards and disasters. On the other hand, if development occurred with mitigation practices in place, the vulnerability may have remained the same or decreased. Additionally, shifting demographics were taken into consideration when assessing development trends. J u Wt er . ldftntnn aacts The table below outlines if climate change, as assessed bythe local planning team, has increased or decreased the municipality's vulnerability/exposure, and thereby the potential impacts, to each natural hazard over the past five (5) years (Current Vulnerability), and the effect of climate change in the future probability of occurrence and impacts (Future Vulnerability) from each natural hazard. Future studies are needed to better understand the impact of climate change on the community's assets. .lir_i�Rn-+.lfle..wlger_c�_eIe)...�l..leeeprre 1reu...:1...zar..rn.e Areas The table below outlines if development, as assessed by the local planning team, over the past five (5) years (Current Vulnerability) has increased or decreased the jurisdiction's vulnerability/exposure, and thereby the potential impacts, to these natural hazards, and the anticipated effects changes in development may have on the future probability of occurrence and impacts (Future Vulnerability) from these natural hazards. 14 VOLUME2: MJ-HMPJURISDICTIONAL,ANNEXES ....... There has been an increase population in our downtown area exposed or vulnerable to natural hazards. Hazard Risk Ranking The Hazard Risk Ranking Table below presents the ranking of the hazards of concern. Hazard area extent and location maps are included at the end of this chapter. These maps are based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this plan, and are considered to be adequate for planning purposes. 15 VOLUME 2: MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONALANNEXES New Mitigation Actions The following are new mitigation actions created during the 2024 update. Action M-9.24 Mitigation Action #24: Develop an updated storm water master plan in order to Identify flood prone areas and possible mitigation projects. Lead Supporting 1 Estimated I Potential Estimated Hazard(s) 1 Agency/Department 1 Agencies/ Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Organizations: Low General Fund Completion Flood (Riverine, Public Works Date: Urban, Short-term Coastal/Shoreline) Year Initiated 2024 Applicable Jurisdiction Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 1,4,5,6 Applicable Objective 3,4,5,6,10 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High) High Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) Low Action/Implementation Plan and Project Develop an updated storm water master plan in order to identify flood prone Description: areas and possible mitigation projects. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; N R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 16 VOLUME?: MJ-HMPJURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES, Action M-9.25 Mitigation Action #25: maintenance and upkeep for village sirens. Lead Supporting Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Agencies/ Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Organizations: Low General Fund Completion Severe Weather Fire Department Emergency Date: (Extreme Heat, Management Ongoing Lightning. Hail, ' Fog, High Winds) I i Tornado Year Initiated 2024 Applicable Jurisdiction Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2,4 I Applicable Objective 1,5 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, High Medium, High) Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss High Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) Action/Implementation Plan and Project Yearly maintenance and upkeep for village sirens. Description: Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; N O =Ongoing Indefinitely; C =Project Completed; R =Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action ' Taken/Delayed 17 Ongoing Mitigation Actions During the 2024 update, these "ongoing" mitigation actions and projects were modified and/or amended, as needed. Action M-9.1 Mitigation Action #1: Maintain good standing under the National Flood Insurance Program by implementing programs that meet or exceed the minimum NFIP requirements. Such programs include enforcing an adopted flood damageprevention ordinance, participating in floodplain mapping updates, and providing' public assistance and information on floodplain requirements and Impacts. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: E Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Low General Fund Completion Flooding Village of Mount Date: Prospect Public Short-term and Works ; Ongoing Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2,3 Applicable Objective 4, 6, 9 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) 1 Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High) i High i Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) Medium Action/Implementation Plan and Project Description: The Village continues to implement programs. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; 18 R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed Action M-9.2 Mitigation Action #2c Continue to maintain or enhance the Village's CRS Classification. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Low General Fund Completion All Hazards Village of Mount Date: Prospect Public Ongoing Works Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2 Applicable Objective 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, I I High High) Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided Medium or Issue Being Mitigated) Action/Implementation Plan and Project The Village submitted documentation at the 5 year cycle recertification visit. Description: Improved to Class 6 Rating. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite I Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 19 ... VOLUME 2. MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES', Action M-9.5 Mitigation Action #5; Continue Creek Bank Stabilization Program. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: i Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: $25,000; HMGP, BRIC, Completion Flooding Village of Mount Low FMA Date: Prospect Public Short-term Works Ongoing Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2,3 Applicable Objective 1, 2, 9, 12 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High) High g Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) High Action/Implementation Plan and Project Description: The Village continues a yearly creek bank stabilization program Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 20 Action M-9.6 Mitigation Action #6: Continue Creek Tree Trimming Program. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: i Organization: $25,000; BRIC, FMA, Completion Flooding, Severe Village of Mount Low HMGP Date: Weather, Prospect Public ? Short-term Tornado Works 3 Ongoing F Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2,3 Applicable Objective 1, 2, 9, 12 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High High) Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided High or Issue Being Mitigated) Action/Implementation Plan and Project The Village continues a yearly tree trimming program. Description: Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: I N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 21 Action M-9.7 Mitigation Action #7: Continue yearly Creek Inspection Program. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Low BRIC, FMA, Completion Flooding Village of Mount ; HMGP Date: Prospect Public i Short-term Works Ongoing Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2,3 Applicable Objective 1, 2, 9, 12 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High) High Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) ; High Action/Implementation Plan and Project Description: The Village continues a yearly creek inspection program. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; O R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 22 Action M-9.8 Mitigation Action #8: Continue yearly Detention Pond Maintenance Program. Lead Supporting Agencies/ I Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: $100,000; BRIC, FMA, Completion Flooding Village of Mount Low HMGP Date: Prospect Public Short-term Works Ongoing Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2,3 Applicable Objective 1, 2, 9, 12 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High High) Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided High or Issue Being Mitigated) Action/Implementation Plan and Project The Village continues a yearly detention pond maintenance program. Description: Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action I Taken/Delayed 23 Action M-9.10 Mitigation Action #10: Develop a Debris Management Plan. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Funding Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: I Cost: Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Low General Fund Completion Date: Multi -Hazard Village of Mount Short-term Ongoing Prospect Public Works I Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 1 Applicable Objective 1 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High) Medium Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) Low Action/Implementation Plan and Project The Village created a storm debris management for trees and tree branches following Description: storm events and is working with ARC to include debris cleanup following an emergency event. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = O Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed Action M-9.11 a onxinue proviamg a or munilry lrrepareaneas tuuioe an qua y on the vittage web page and the village Newsletter. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Funding Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Low General Fund Completion Date: Multi -Hazard Village of Mount Short-term Ongoing Prospect Public Works Year Initiated 2014 24 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2,6 Applicable Objective j 1, 2,51 6, 8, 12 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High High) Organization: Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or High Issue Being Mitigated) Village of Mount Action/Implementation Plan and Project The Village continues to make available the Community Preparedness Guide on the Description: Village web page and in the Village newsletter. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite (depending on Project Status & Changes in Priority Works Completion status legend: funding) N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Village of Mount Prospect Taken/Delayed Applicable Goal Action M-9.15 Mitigation Action #15: Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchasing, or relocating structures In hazard -prone areas to prevent future I damage. Give priority to properties with exposure torepetitive -losses. _ LeadSupporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Funding Estimated Hazard(s) i Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: High BRIC, FMA, HMGP Completion Date: All Hazards Village of Mount I Long-term Prospect Public (depending on Works funding) Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2 Applicable Objective 7,13 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) High Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, Medium High) Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or High Issue Being Mitigated) 25 _�. _ ..�......... VOLUME 2: MJ -HMP JURISDCCTIONALANNEXES' Action/Implementation Plan and Project The Village continues to support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures in I Description hazard -prone areas. A building permit was issued for retrofitting of a residential home to reduce the chance of flooding. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed Action M-9.16 Mitigation Action #16: Continue to support the countywide actions identified in this`plan£ Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Low General Fund Completion All ViLLage of Mount Date: Prospect Public Short- and Long - Works term i Year Initiated 2014 ; Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal E 1,2,3,4,5,6 Applicable Objective All Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High) High Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) Medium Action/Implementation Plan and Project Description: The Village continues to support the countywide actions. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority O I 26 Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed Action M-9.17 i Mitigation Action #17: Actively participate In the plan maintenance strategy identified in this plan. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Low General Fund Completion All EMRS, Village of Date: Mount Prospect ? Short-term Public Works Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2 Applicable Objective 3, 4, 6 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, ' High High) Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided Medium or Issue Being Mitigated) Action/Implementation Plan and Project The Village continues to participate in the plan maintenance strategy through Description: this annual progress report. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite ' Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 27 Action M-9.18 Mitigation Action #18: Integrate the hazard mitigation plan Into other plans, programs, or resources that dictate land use or redevelopment. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Low General Fund Completion All Hazards Village of Mount Date: Prospect Public Short-term Works I Year Initiated 2014 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 3 - Applicable Objective 3, 4, 6, 10, 13 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High) High Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) Medium Action/Implementation Plan and Project The Village continues to look forways to integrate the mitigation plan into i Description: other plans, programs or resources. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; O R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 28 Action M-9.21 Mitigation Action #21: Conduct a Floodplain Study of Higgins Creek. Lead ! Supporting Agencies/ I Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: $75,000; MWRD Completion Flooding MWRD Medium Date: Short-term Year Initiated 2019 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal i 1,2,3,4,5,6 Applicable Objective 3, 4, 13 Medium—The project could be implemented with existingfunding but would Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) require a re -apportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High High) I Medium—Project will have a long-term impact on the reduction of risk Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided exposure for life and property, or project will provide an immediate reduction or Issue Being Mitigated) in the risk exposure for property. Higgins Creek is an unnumbered zone with no defined BFE or Action/Implementation Plan and Project floodway/floodplain limits. A portion of Higgins Creek has recently annexed Description: into Mount Prospect. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion-, O O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; ' R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 29 VOLUME 2: MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES Action M-9.22 WIgatiorl Action #22: Stormwater Storage Construction in Mount Prosper Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: Village of Mount $2,000,000; MWRD and Completion Flooding MWRD Prospect Public Works MWRD BRIC, FMA, Date: Contribution: i HMGP Short and Long TBD; High � Term I Year Initiated 2019 I Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 1,2,3 Applicable Objective 2, 3, 9, 12 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) High Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High) High Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided or Issue Being Mitigated) High ID: Mount Prospect Contract: 18-IGA-25 Action/Implementation Plan and Project Watershed: Lower Des Plaines Description: Location: Mount Prospect, IL Design and construction of two newflood storage basins and upgrade of ancillary storm sewers to provide a cumulative flood storage volume of approximately 30 acre-feet. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; O R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 30 Action M-9.23 Mitigation Action #23: Continue annual Levee 37 Inspection. Lead Supporting Agencies/ Estimated Potential Estimated Hazard(s) Agency/Department Organizations: Cost: Funding Source: Projected Mitigated: Organization: IL Dept of Natural Low BRIC, FMA, Completion Dam/Levee US Army Corps of Resources j HMGP Date: failure, Flooding Engineers Ongoing Year Initiated 2023 Applicable Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Applicable Goal 2,3 Applicable Objective 1 Cost Analysis (Low, Medium, High) Low Priority and Level of Importance (Low, Medium, High g High) Medium—Project will have a long-term impact on the reduction of risk Benefits of the Mitigation Project (Loss Avoided exposure for life and property, or project will provide an immediate reduction in the risk exposure for property. or Issue Being Mitigated) Properly running pumps and a structurally sound levee wall will ensure flood protection from the Des Plaines River for hundreds of homes. The Village of Mount Prospect conducts quarterly inspections of Levee 37 including the pumping stations and gate structures. On an annual basis, the Action/Implementation Plan and Project US Army Corps of Engineers, IL Dept of Natural Resources, and Village of Description: Mount Prospect conduct a joint inspection of the levee. Any issues that arise from the quarterly or annual inspections are addressed by the Village. Actual Completion Date or Ongoing Indefinite Project Status & Changes in Priority Completion status legend: N = New; I = In Progress Toward Completion; O I O = Ongoing Indefinitely; C = Project Completed; R = Want Removed from Annex; X = No Action Taken/Delayed 31 Completed Actions Completed Mitigation Actions - An archive of all identified and completed projects, including completed actions since 2014. Completed Action Items Complete construction of Levee 37 Purchase emergency generator for Village water well. Inspect Village warning sirens and review the need for replacements. Conduct New Town Subdivision Storm Drainage Analysis. Complete Catalpa Lane Area Drainage Improvements, Complete Park Drive Area Drainage Improvements. Increase pumping capacity of Levee 37 pump stations. Future Needs to Better Understand RiskNulnerability None at this time. Additional Comments None at this time. Kepi Hazard Mapping 33 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE Oil Facilities Transit Centers Military Facilities Police Stations Fire Stations _ - Hazardous Waste Airports © Hospitals Highway Bridges Warming Centers Cooling Centers f. Schools ® Railroad Stations Base Map Data Sources: Cook County, ESRI �o� COOL{ COUNTY EMSr n �sl 3 .� � ■x� a 3�v 0 OI75045 09 135 1B Moes VOLUME 2: MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES 34 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION FOR A 100 YEAR EARTHQUAKE EVENT rca3ie 3e�k, ��ylanieal Steal##(rad I:....' -.:Rl Weak Dara Plovded by the USGS Earthquake Hazards RW,r n end Cook Cou., R—In— —.— hazed maps ve a prepared for Yc Wn 11—ua Un4ed Slele61ar 2014 porbayng peak hor¢onaal ea:elaraton aid hwtzonlal Wttd.al reslzwme erallon IW 02� antl 1 6second pwods nit Wabadlves d e,ceetlance of 10 pwcent in 50 years and ,"."in 50 veal: Au d 01e naps vme prepared by —bnlrp 1M hazard d—ed I— aWnally smoothed Iuco—I ee dy, sMh Ne hazard Irom hull speak K The accebrabw values contoured are Ina lendom hoy¢odal ..W nt The releten. sae mndlbon o lira rack, dM— ash.,,, an ,,,,g, cheer-wwe veloaly d 760 Ms n the tap 30 -- -1--P--g W die boundary between NEHRP IN..nal [Dt quake Hazalda Reduebon program) ate losses a and C h CaokC ry1 wla.a- _€.z 3.:.. *-Etat% –�CounN makes no iepresenlabbns or vnr antes ea WessdlnpbM as to aracy wmpldeness -d—or rghm w the use d suds inlwmaWn Cook County I-II mt be kabb Iw a y Ynnerar speaal indnecl, ncslenlal, w wnsequenbal tla_ nn,1w,ng, but no[Ilmaedb bsl revenues or bsl prohk reculbng hon the use o, insula of the ,nloinwhm canlaned W i Iha n.p Any sale of the nup w nlanrebon w Misr p Is pioNbaed eats" by vnitlan pertzusvon d C k County COOK C*" EMRS w+, �Y Np 636iRrra3 Id C. J$lTl $ 0 0225 045 09 S35 ''-6 m 35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION PROGRAM (NEHRP) SOIL CLASSIFICATION TYPE C - Very Dense Soil, Soft Rock D - Stiff Soil J F- Site Specific Evaluation Data pronded by Me Illmos Stale Geobgl®I !%—y and cook Courcy The Central Unded Sales Unhq ke Consowum (CUSEC) 5mle Geologists gaduced a reg—1 Sal Sta Cmee map(NEHRP Sod Proble Type Map) a Uq Iaaion Suscepbminy Mop and! a Sod Response Map for db 8 soles W be W, the FEMA New Mecind Caosbophw%,,mg 1,l ePhase 11-1, The USGS GeologK 1—ph- Sere, 12188 Map of SudKol Depoan and Mater®Ism Me E-Wln arM Cental Unded State IFast .1 102 db,,,- West LolryiWde) by Dasd S Fullerton ChalmsA Bush and Jean N N..11(2003) was the ham map used fol Ihus —w Eeb Sob Geological Suway produced As own sole map uersnn o1 Me Sal Site Loss and Lqudaawn S—Pbbday!reps The Pwcedoes ow,hed m Me NEHRPW '.-a(bulMmg Seivmc Safety Council 2')01) and the 20031nlelnabonal Bolding Codes (Intamebonel Cade Ccuncd, 2002) sere Wl d W produce Ma roll We d...nap, CUSEC 5— Ge N,- used Ina entire solute. of .11b, malellal doom m bedrock end did not include any bedrock in Me .._l on of Mea elage sneer wa+e=s-.ra•:;. Im ills rhea, ovblooty of Me-. in ocmperraon W the bed— whch W-nces much of the —pal—bon The inmlmabon nbluded on Iles map has been compiled for Cook � hty hen a -nely of sources and R subpa W mange wMout nobw Cookoun Cty !rakes no represeMbons or wofran006, sapless of impwd os b wlasy complden. on.., or n hm to the use d sub inlolme1- Cook County ahea not be bebb for any gen-1,,peaal, lnd— madenml, w ddnseeuenbal damages lntludinp, but nil LmAetl b, bsl levellues al bs<prdlm rasumng Iwo the urs cl mlwse p1 Me mlarmabon mnometl on Mm map Any... of Me nap a mlomvbon m Nle —p.. W-beed except by wnden IRlmiaslon d Cook Coady C00X CO U �LN T Y /nAp MRS W�{y1. gh �� Aux ac.lE�JxaLf[sta€�� S D 02 Od 08 12 1fi Miles . ... ......... .. VOLUME 2: MJ -HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES DISCLAIMER: The Cook County MWRDGC 100 -year Inundation Map is provided to show general flood risk information regard Ing floodplains and inundation areas. This map is not regulatory. Official FEMA Flood Insurance Study information and regulatory maps can be obtained from http://v-tjV ,f-p-rt,e. ov. 36 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COOK COUNTY MWRDGC 100 -YEAR INUNDATION AREA c ti 100 -year Inundation Area MWRDGC Data provided by Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago and Cook County. The Information included on this map has been compiled for Cook County from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice Cook County makes no represenlabons or warranties, express of implied, as to accuracy, completeness, llmellness, or rights to the use of such mformalion. Cook County shall not be liable forany general, special, indirect, inddental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information contained on this map Any sale of this map or information on this map Is prohibited except by written permission of Cook County. C OK Covilloy N MRS WL P€9rtwPo4 ii4'@€it 5 0 02 04 09 12 16 M- 37 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY high low very low uo., n=o,mr� �l v� Ill�noe s;de Ralcyical ;;:�- . �n Ino Ccneaul . Eamq���,-. (_uo.�:muln ICJs�et� o¢.J ss „,o.. ale Cm sx r ay J.O IId+S:� I PiW i= l iFe I% �-, L�y�alacicn s�sraIJ I,Up ui�.iu �kuspunx Mali I � �E11 e11�e.•. Rla..na (:atnslraplei �"r�lf nnii ly I���lat'.cl l`na'A II :.cih � 1 isle :,. c taU o'tU: Jen luuaI by fia.�rl 5 Fulleitu,� :..iail�e AC'.uls ll a Eat cal a` uJuc slel2 nia2r<eis ancl tl 2nl^ail =ila�s snq�l�ly .ills Tw-p i.etl..- I'lellfPpry SIfu�JinJ Sc cS>: �12u aZ�q]Jl e`JGOi .tu lJinJ �� 1. n:�n.licnal Cy..;e (Icanc'I _ G'1'�, rlc'. 2111c [I V JJ(ti ne wll site t -lass reaps ;:��=�_ �la;e lu�peJ c:h us.l JlJei itl�ilcu .u.... Ille. peJ, o,k ..n�[M1 llaliu..i,cesn „„iul lCe mp�V.auu. In malit+ aUAe scl.ct` c—, c: pie....tal... ........... e. Fess iinle; , el laLe uyt.- Ia:1v iJ 111�a ;cJ Iv .,i COOK COUNrV st Prolns icsul; nn Irclm tnr u�w - �aloa of ns nvp cilcJtk�lian a� tl ,tip is ricnicil 1 t epl LI nuRen µ•i n�i_�un u! Guuk l;uuulr F3 EMRS - Rk4lktwOHAI SfEu§Fiq 1 VOLUME 2: MJ-HMP JURISDICTIONAL ANNEXES 38 ORDINANCE NO. 6778 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: That in accordance with Subsection A of Section 13.108 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, the Corporate Authorities shall determine the number of Liquor Licenses available in each Classification and shall establish a list specifying the number of Liquor Licenses authorized. Said list is hereby amended. This Ordinance will decrease the number of Class "F-7" licenses by (1) DAVE'S SPECIALTY FOODS INC d/b/a DAVE'S SPECIALTY FOODS located at 105 W. Prospect Avenue, Mount Prospect, IL. Said list is as follows: Five (5) Class P-1 License Nine (9) Class P-2 License One (1) Class P-3 License Zero (0) Class P-4 License Zero (0) Class P-5 License Nine (9) Class F-1 License One (1) Class F -1-V License Six (6) Class F-2 License Six (6) Class F -2-V License Sixteen (16) Class F-3 License Twelve (12) Class F -3-V License One (1) Class F -4-V License Three (3) Class F-5 License Two (2) Class F-6 License Zero (0) Class F-7 License One (1) Class F-8 License Two (2) Class S-1 License Three (3) Class S-2 License Zero (0) Class S-31-icense Zero (0) Class S-41-icense One (1) Class S-5 License Two (2) Class S-6 License Two (2) Class S-7 License One(1) Class S-8 License Zero (0) Class S-9(with conditions as Attached to License) SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: Dante, Filippone, Gens, Grossi, Saccotelli NAYS: None ABSENT: None PASSED and APPROVED this 4th day of Feba ATTEST.' Village CIA Class Establishment Number P-1 Cardinal Wine & Spirits; D&H Liquors; Jay Liquors; Jenny's Liquors; Mount Prospect Liquors & Tobacco; 5 P-2 Caputo's Fresh Market; Costco; Fiesta Market; KD Market; Osco Drug Store #3476; 9 CVS Pharmacy; Walgreens #00209 (Kensington); Walgreens #05107(Elmhurst); Wal-Mart #1681 P-3 Aldi; 1 P-4 0 F-1 Chung Wa 827; Honey Biscuit; Izakaya Sankyu; LePeep Cafe; Los Arcos; 9 MI Restaurant; Mr. Kimchi Korean BBQ; New Pusan Restaurant; Pueblo Viejo; F -1-V La Presa; 1 F-2 Buona; E -Sushi; Misoya Chicago; MOD Pizza; Sakae Restaurant; Trilokah 6 F -2-V Avanti Cafe and Sandwich Bar; Jelly Cafe; Mr. Beef & Pizza; 6 Rosati's Pizza; Tortas Locas; Wingsnob F-3 Balkan Taste; BlackFinn —Randhurst Grille; Buffalo Wild Wings Grill and Bar; 16 Fellini Restaurant & Pizzeria; Hacienda EI Sombrero; Hong Dae,; Khepri Kitchen +Coffee; Lady Dahlia Tequila Bar; Mia's Cantina;Mr.Kimchi Korean BBQ;Patina Wine Bar; Summertime; Tavern on Elmhurst; Texas Road House; The Prospect; Trezero's; F -3-V Big Fish's Icehouse; Canta Napoli; Draft Picks; Emerson's; Jameson's Charhouse; 12 Langostino's Nayarit; Moretti's; Mount Prospect Public House; Mrs. P & Me; Sports Shack; Station 34; The Red Barn; F -4-V Prospect Moose Lodge 1 F-5 Emerald Banquets; Olive Palace; Victoria in the Park 3 F-6 Mt. Prospect Park District -Golf Course; Prospect Heights Park District 2 F-7 0 F-8 Salerno's Pizzeria & Eatery & Whiskey Hill Brewing & Kitchen 1 S-1 Four Points by Sheraton Mount Prospect; Hampton Inn & Suites 2 S-2 Bowlero; Golf Factory; The Picklr 3 S-3 0 S-4 0 S-5 AMC Randhurst 12 1 S-6 Amethyst Skye; Lumi Studio & Shoppe 2 S-7 Northern Fork; Victoria Venue 2 S-8 Two Eagles Distillery 1 83