Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6.3 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2024 COOK COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
Subject Meeting Fiscal Impact (Y/N) Dollar Amount Budget Source Category Type Information Item Cover Page RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2024 COOK COUNTY MULTI - JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN February 4, 2025 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD N N/A N/A CONSENT AGENDA Action Item In 2014, Mount Prospect and 114 other Cook County communities joined with Cook County and developed, accepted, approved and adopted the Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires that the HMP is updated and approved by FEMA every 5 years. Mount Prospect has been working with Cook County and now 124 other communities to prepare the required HMP update. Each community must adopt the updated HMP. Once the updated HMP is adopted by all of the planning partners and approved by FEMA, the partnership will collectively and individually remain eligible to apply for hazard mitigation project funding from both the Pre -Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (PDM) and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). The Cook County Board adopted the 2024 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan on July 25, 2024. Discussion This plan is designed to prepare for and lessen the impacts of specified natural hazards, responding to federal mandates in the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390). The coalition was formed to pool resources and create a uniform hazard mitigation strategy that can be consistently applied and used to ensure eligibility for specified grant funding sources. The result of the organizational efforts has been to produce a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) approved HMP. Each jurisdiction has been responsible for the review and approval of their individual sections of the HMP. The HMP is a two -volume document consisting of over 700 pages. They can be downloaded from the Cook County website at: https://www.cookcountyemergencvmanagement.org/hmp. An Executive Summary is included as Attachment 1. Volume 1 contains the elements of the plan common to all parties and consists of: • Planning Process • Risk Assessment • Mitigation Strategy • Plan Maintenance Strategy • Plan Adoption Volume 2 is made up of the individual community's chapters, or annexes. Each community went through the risk analysis and prioritized the risks and mitigations actions. The Mount Prospect Annex is included as Attachment 2. The elements of the Village's Annex include: • Jurisdiction Profile • Capability Assessment • Natural Hazard Event History • Hazard Risk Ranking • Mitigation Actions AIfornnfivac 1. Adopt the 2024 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. 2. Action at the direction of the Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Village Board adopt the 2024 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Attachments 1. Attachment 1 Cook County Hazard Mitigation Plan Executive Summary 2. Attachment 2 Mount Prospect Annex 3. Resolution IiFVA_1 SIaIII[0_AILai LIaW.1\1 JULY 20241 PUBLIC VERSION PREPARED FOR: COOK COUNTY G b b k 0 t0 EMRSG lrt " EMERGENCYT ° " ° AND REGIONAL SECURITY Cook County Emergency Management and Regional Security 69 W. Washington St., Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Toni Preckwinkle President Cool(County Board of Commissioners Theodore Berger Executive Director Cook County Emergency Management and Regional Security ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................. 1 Part 1. The Planning Process................................................................................................ 8 Chapter1 Introduction.............................................................................................................9 1.1 Why Prepare This Plan.....................................................................................................9 1.2 Who Will Benefit from this Plan?.....................................................................................10 1.3 How to Use This Plan.....................................................................................................11 ChapterPlan Methodology...................................................................................................12 2.1 Grant Funding...............................................................................................................12 2.2 Formation of the Planning Team.....................................................................................12 2.3 Establishment of the Planning Partnership.....................................................................12 2.4 Defining the Planning Area.............................................................................................13 2.5 The Steering Committee................................................................................................13 2.6 Coordination with Other Agencies, Partners, and Neighboring Jurisdictions .....................15 2.7 Local Jurisdiction Plan Participation...............................................................................19 2.8 Review of Existing Plans and Programs...........................................................................27 2.9 Updates of Prior Plans...................................................................................................27 2.10 Public Involvement......................................................................................................28 2.11 Plan Development Chronology/Milestones...................................................................30 Part2. Risk Assessment................................................................................................ 31 Chapter 3 Identified Hazards of Cook County..........................................................................32 3.1 Identified Hazards of Concern........................................................................................32 3.2 Other Hazards of Interest (Human -caused and Technological Hazards)...........................33 3.3 Presidential Disaster (DR) & Emergency Declarations (EM) in Cook County......................34 3.4 Risk Assessment Methodology.......................................................................................37 3.5 Overall Risk Scores........................................................................................................43 Chapter 4 Cook County Profile................................................................................................45 4.1 Jurisdiction and Attractions............................................................................................46 4.2 Historical Overview.......................................................................................................47 4.3 Physical Setting.............................................................................................................49 4.4 Land Use.......................................................................................................................50 4.5 Population Data and Characteristics..............................................................................51 4.6 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure...............................................................................68 4.7 Economy.......................................................................................................................70 4.8 Higher Education...........................................................................................................73 4.9 Transportation...............................................................................................................74 4.10 Housing and Living.......................................................................................................75 4.11 Future Trends in Development......................................................................................76 4.12 Laws, Ordinances, Programs, and Plans.......................................................................76 Chapter Risk Assessment....................................................................................................83 5.1 High Hazard Dams and Levees.......................................................................................83 5.2 Drought.......................................................................................................................124 5.3 Earthquake.................................................................................................................139 5.4 Flooding......................................................................................................................169 5.5 Severe Weather...........................................................................................................255 5.6 Severe Winter Weather................................................................................................ 334 5.7 Tornado....................................................................................................................... 395 5.8 Wildfire.......................................................................................................................410 5.9 Other Hazards of Concern...........................................................................................426 Part 3. Mitigation Strategy................................................................................................468 Chapter 6 Mission, Goals, and Objectives.............................................................................469 6.1 Mission.......................................................................................................................469 6.2 Goals..........................................................................................................................469 6.3 Objectives...................................................................................................................469 6.4 Community Lifelines....................................................................................................470 Chapter 7 Mitigation Action Plan...........................................................................................472 7.1 Mitigation Strategy/Action Timeline Parameters............................................................473 7.2 Mitigation Strategy/Action Benefit Parameters..............................................................473 7.3 Mitigation Strategy/Action Estimated Cost Parameters ..................................................473 7.4 Mitigation Strategy/Action Prioritization Process ...........................................................473 Chapter 8 Mitigation Alternatives and Strategies....................................................................475 8.1 Mitigation Strategies by County or Regional Agencies/Departments ..............................478 8.2 Mitigation Strategies by Community.............................................................................478 8.3 NFIP-Specific Mitigation Actions and Implementation ...................................................478 Chapter 9 Plan Integration Strategy.......................................................................................480 9.1 Process and Mechanism for Plan Integration................................................................480 9.2 Examples of Plan Integration........................................................................................481 Part 4. Plan Maintenance Strategy....................................................................................489 Chapter 10 Steering Committee............................................................................................490 Chapter 11 Plan Implementation...........................................................................................491 11.1 Formal Review Process..............................................................................................491 11.2 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Assessing Plan Effectiveness ...........................................492 11.3 Annual Steering Committee Planning Meetings ...........................................................492 Chapter 12 Annual Progress Report.......................................................................................494 Chapter 13 Plan Update Process...........................................................................................497 13.1 Five -Year Action Plan.................................................................................................497 Chapter 14 Continuing Public Involvement............................................................................500 Chapter 15 Incorporation into Other Planning Mechanisms ....................................................501 Part5. Plan Adoption....................................................................................................502 Appendices......................................................................................................................503 AppendixA Acronyms and Definitions...........................................................................504 Appendix B Plan Process and Development...................................................................515 Appendix C Public Participation Documentation............................................................546 Appendix D Concepts, Methods and Data Sources Used for Hazard Mapping ..................629 Appendix E Annual Progress Report Template and Process ............................................632 Appendix F Jurisdictional Linkage Strategy....................................................................635 Appendix G Plan Adoption Resolution from Planning Partners ........................................642 iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hazard mitigation is the use of long-term and short-term policies, programs, projects, and other activities to alleviate the death, injury, and property damage that can result from a disaster. Cook County and a coalition of 125 municipal planning partners prepared and updated the 2024 Cool< County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJ -HMP) in order to identify the risks posed by hazards and find ways to reduce their impacts. The plan reduces risk for those who live in, work in, and visit the County. Participating Partners and the Planning Area The responsibility for hazard mitigation lies with many, including private property owners, business and industry, and local, state, and federal government. Through multi -jurisdictional partnerships, local jurisdictions within an area with uniform risk exposure can pool resources and eliminate redundant planning activities. Cook County opened this planning effort to all municipalities within the County. Table: Planning Partners lists the partners that participated in the planning process and are covered under this plan. The planning area was defined as all incorporated and unincorporated areas of Cook County and the incorporated areas of cities that cross county boundaries. The planning area boundary is shown in the figure below (Figure: Planning Area). �y � ✓ �beM�AE'�+�4aMlhp"�'� 1� y" � o, i � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII )J 4 y uw�arrsq✓µ4iN"�9!�o�r�r �;.., l ab amw ' � `,!9WiW�N1,Jou➢!MofJil�9D9NDd�1PN l/�///o//�//��iy///in�PUv�OT/0 � laullu ��O/�//%/%/%//////O/O,�% ",,`'� yi, r" kip f %/ %mmmmmrtmrt Plannin Area Boundary f i mc-- zal County Baaindlam baa a° // 00 / a z m G� e-, +IumN:,9.Urc�uwr ti O Axi D M// �A F l� f#r f ; v AN 3DU0D19WJNP1DlU,lyN�1d�9DPP�'iYN�JY!1��IWIDUN�u ��pA� ,. v��/' „ 7 i ,;,;,'wklarauIDrx �i ,, Mt"b WILL COUNTY .,..,. r s INA i s r 0 2 4 ,�, ,r> > ,� , ��� ; ,�» r.ny,��.,, IN➢M(��i�' �/l/////////t✓l//1/U%/%�O/'%/ ""��QWVf1%/%%%%6%/" of 4l comy r r 2 The jurisdictions not participating in the 2024 MJ -HMP are border jurisdictions and are part of other county mitigation plans. Arlington Heights Bellwood Alsip Barrington Berkeley Bedford Park Buffalo Grove Berwyn Blue Island Des Plaines Broadview Bridgeview Elgin Brookfield Burbank Elk Grove Village City of Chicago Burnham Evanston Cicero Calumet City Glencoe Countryside Calumet Park Glenview Elmwood Park Chicago Heights Golf Forest Park Chicago Ridge Hanover Park Forest View Country Club Hills Hoffman Estates Franklin Park Crestwood Inverness Harwood Heights Dixmoor Kenilworth Hillside Dolton Lincolnwood Hodgkins East Hazel Crest Morton Grove Indian Head Park Evergreen Park Mount Prospect LaGrange Flossmoor Niles LaGrange Park Ford Heights Northbrook Lyons Glenwood Northfield Maywood Harvey Palatine McCook Hazel Crest Park Ridge Melrose Park Hickory Hills Prospect Heights Norridge Hometown Rolling Meadows Northlake Homewood Schaumburg North Riverside Justice Skokie Oak Park Lansing South Barrington River Forest Lemont Streamwood River Grove Lynwood Wheeling Riverside Markham Wilmette Rosemont Matteson Winnetka Schiller Park Merrionette Park Barrington Hills (root Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Stickney Midlothian Bartlett (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Stone Park Oak Forest Deerfield (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Summit Oak Lawn Deer Park (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Westchester Olympia Fields East Dundee (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP)) Western Springs Orland Hills Roselle (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Bensenville (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Orland Park Burr Ridge (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Palos Heights Elmhurst (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Palos Hills Hinsdale (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Palos Park Oak Brook (Not Par-ticipatingin 2024 Cook County Ml -HMP) Park Forest Phoenix Posen Richton Park Riverdale Robbins Sauk Village South Chicago Heights South Holland Steger Thornton Tinley Park University Park Willow Springs Worth Frankfort (Not Participating in 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP) Woodridge (Not Participatingin2024Cook County MPHMP) Plan Development and Organization The 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP was updated by a planning team of Cook County Department of Emergency Management and Regional Security staff and expert consultants, with guidance from a steering committee representing the planning partners and other local stakeholders. The key steps in updating the plan were as follows: 1. Determine the Planning Area and Resources 2. Build and Reconvene the Planning Team 3. Outreach Strategy 4. Review and Update Community Capabilities 5. Update and Conduct the Risk Assessment 6. Update the Mitigation Strategy 7. Keep the Plan Current C! 8. Review and Adopt the Plan 9. Create a Safe and Resilient Community The final plan consists of two volumes. Volume 1 includes all federally required elements of a disaster mitigation plan that apply to the entire planning area. Volume 2 consists of all federally required jurisdiction -specific elements in individual annexes for each participating jurisdiction. Mission Goals and Objectives The defined mission for the 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP is to "Identify risks and sustainable, cost- effective actions to mitigate the impact of natural hazards to protect the life, health, safety, welfare, and economy of the communities of Cook County." Mitigation goals were established as follows: 1. Develop and implement sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally sound risk - reduction (mitigation) projects. 2. Protect the lives, health, safety, and property of Cook County residents from natural hazards. 3. Protect public services and critical facilities, including infrastructure, from loss of use during natural hazard events and potential damage from such activities. 4. Involve stakeholders to enhance the local capacity to mitigate, prepare for, and respond to the impacts of natural hazards. 5. Develop, promote, and integrate mitigation action plans. 6. Promote public understanding of and support for hazard mitigation. Thirteen objectives were established for the plan to meet multiple goals and serve as stand-alone measurements of the effectiveness of the mitigation action. Proposed mitigation actions were evaluated in part based on how many goals and objectives they would help to fulfill. 1. Eliminate or minimize disruption of local government operations caused by natural hazards through all phases of emergency management. 2. Increase the resilience of (or protect and maintain) infrastructure and critical facilities. 3. Consider the impacts of natural hazards on future land uses in the planning area, including possible impacts from climate change. 4. Integrate hazard mitigation policies into land use plans in the planning area. 5. Develop, improve, and protect systems that provide early warnings, emergency response communications, and evacuation procedures. 6. Use the best available data, science and technologies to educate the public and to improve understanding of the location and potential impacts of natural hazards, the vulnerability of building types and community development patterns, and the measures needed to protect Life safety. 7. Retrofit, purchase, or relocate structures in high -hazard areas, including those known to be repetitively damaged. 8. Establish partnerships among aLL Levels of local government, the private sector, and/or nongovernmental organizations to improve and implement methods to protect people, including underserved and underrepresented groups, and property. 9. Provide or improve flood protection on a watershed basis with flood control structures and drainage maintenance plans. 10. Strengthen codes and land use planning and their enforcement so that new construction or redevelopment can avoid or withstand the impacts of natural hazards. 5 11. Encourage mitigation through incentive -based programs like the Community Rating System and Storm Ready programs. 12. Reduce natural hazard -related risks and vulnerabilityto potentially isolated and underserved populations within the planning area and ensure mitigation strategies result in equitable outcomes. 13. Encourage hazard mitigation measures that have the least adverse effect on the natural environment and use natural processes. Detailed risk assessments were performed for each of these hazards of concern. Also, a brief qualitative review was conducted of technological and human -caused hazards of interest. Climate Change was addressed for each hazard, as applicable. Risk Assessment Methodology The risk assessments of the identified hazards of concern describe the risks associated with each hazard. The following steps were used to define the risk of each hazard: • Profile and update each hazard, describing the geographic area it affects, its frequency and severity, and the warning time provided before a hazard event occurs. • Use maps of hazard impact areas, as appropriate, to determine and update the number of structures, facilities, and systems exposed to each hazard. • Assess the vulnerability of exposed structures and infrastructure based on exposure and the probability of occurrence of a hazard event. Tools such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) hazard -modeling program HAZUS-MH were used to perform an assessment for flood and earthquake. Profiles of Cook County Natural Hazards The following natural hazards are addressed in the 2024 Cook County MJ -HMP. For a more detailed analysis of each hazard, please refer to Part 2. Risk Assessment. • Dam/levee failure o Dam Failure o Levee Failure • Drought • Earthquake • Flood o Riverine Flooding o Urban Flooding o Coastal Flooding ■ Seiche ■ Coastal Erosion • Severe Summer Storms o Extreme Heat o Lightning o Hail o Fog 9 o High Winds • Severe Winter Storms o Snow o Blizzards o Ice Storms o Extreme Cold and Wind Chill • Tornado • Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Matthew Lawrie, Village Engineer Jim Miller, Emergency Management 1700 West Central Road Coordinator Mount Prospect, IL 60056 111 E. Rand Road Telephone: 847-870-5640 Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Email Address: Telephone: 847-818-5660 mlawrie@mountprospect.org Email Address: jmiller@mountprospect.org Jurisdiction Profile The following is a summary of key information about the jurisdiction and its history: Date of Incorporation: 1917 Current Population: The 2020 U.S. Census population was 56,852. The 2022 U.S. Census estimate indicated the population was 54,843. Population Growth: The overall population has increased by 1.19% between 2018 and 2022. Location and Description: The Village of Mount Prospect is a suburb 22 miles northwest from downtown Chicago. It is bordered by Prospect Heights to the north, 1-90 and Elk Grove Village to the south, Des Plaines to the east and Arlington Heights to the west. The center of town is at the intersection of US Route 14 and Illinois Route 83. The Union Pacific Northwest rail lines run through the center of town. There is a Metra train station at 11 E Northwest Hwy. Mount Prospect has a land area of 10.37 square miles. Brief History: The original inhabitants of the area that encompasses Mount Prospect today were Native Americans. Yankees were the first American settlers to the area, but they were the second group. German immigrants had the most significant impact in terms of population and cultural traditions. In 1850, the train rolled into town. This led to an increasing specialization in the farming community. Not long after the train station was built, others began building stores and houses downtown and made the Village of Mount Prospect come to life. In 1917, Mount Prospect reached a population of 300 and was incorporated. From there, the largest growth came during land speculations in the 1920s and then the suburban movements that followed World War 11. The baby boom expanded the population and the Village began expanding the services it offered. In the early 1960s, the business community in Mount Prospect took a leap forward with the construction of Randhurst, the first indoor air-conditioned mall in the upper Midwest. Another major event was the development of Kensington Business Center, which has been the home to national and international 1 firms including NTN Bearing, Searle, Braun Manufacturing Cummins -Allison Corp., and ITT Technical Institute. In the 1990s and 2000s attention was turned to downtown redevelopment. Climate: Mount Prospect's climate is typical of suburban Chicago and the Midwest in general. Average rainfall is 32 inches per year and average snowfall is 24 inches. The average year round temperature is 48.2 degrees. In July the average high temperature is 83 degrees and in January the average low temperature is 11 degrees. The average humidity is 72.27% Governing Body Format: The Village of Mount Prospect is governed by a Village President and a 6 member Board of Trustees. This body will assume the responsibility for the adoption and implementation of this plan. The Village consists of six departments: Community Development, Finance, Human Services, Fire, Police and Public Works. The Village has 12 committees and commissions that report to the Village Board. Development Trends: The Village continues to see significant development activity in the commercial sector including the recent redevelopment of Randhurst Village (1,000,000 square foot regional center), expansion efforts by national retailers such as Walmart and Menards, and the refurbishing of Mount Prospect Plaza (300,000 square feet). The industrial/office sector has not increased development but United Airlines and CVS/Caremark recently constructed two large facilities in the Village. UAL constructed a 200,000 square foot data center that will serve their entire international operations. CVS occupied a 175,000 square foot facility to operate their mail order prescription services. After a 5 -year lull in residential construction activity, the Village has issued permits for two multi -family projects in the downtown district. In addition, a 92 -unit senior independent living facility is under construction and is scheduled to be complete by mid -2014. As of 2019, there are many current projects in Mount Prospect including 2 senior housing developments, gas station, industrial and commercial development, rowhomes and luxury apartments. Changes in Community Priorities: There have been no significant changes in priority regarding the hazards that could potentially impact the community or changes in priority regarding resilience. Capability Assessment The assessment of the jurisdiction's legal and regulatory capabilities is presented in the Legal and Regulatory Capability Table below. The assessment of the jurisdiction's fiscal capabilities is presented in the Fiscal Capability Table below. The assessment of the jurisdiction's administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Administrative and Technical Capability Table below. Information on the community's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in the National Flood Insurance Program Compliance Table below. Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in the Community Classifications Table below. TABLE: LEGAL AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY State or Other Local State Federal Jurisdictional Comments Authority Mandated Prohibitions Authority Codes, Ordinances & Requirements __TChapter 21, Building Code Yes No No Yes 2013 2 Chapter 14,1993 Zonings Yes No No Yes Chapter 15,2002 Subdivisions Yes No No No State regulates industrial activity from Construction Stormwater sites 1 acre or Yes No Yes Yes Management larger under section 402 CWA. Chapter 16, 2002 Post Disaster No No No No Recovery (765 1 LCS 77/) Residential Real Estate Real Property Yes No Yes Yes Disclosure Disclosure Act. Chapter 8, 2001 Growth No No No No Management Site Plan Chapter 15, Yes No No No Review 2002 Public Health Chapter 19, Yes No No No and Safety 1957 Environmental Chapter 16, Yes No No No Protection 2002 Planning Documents General or Comprehensive Yes No No No Plan Yes, plan include land Is the plan equipped to provide integration to this mitigation plan? use and redevelopment components.' Floodplain or Yes No No No 9/20/2011 Basin Plan Regional stormwater impacts are managed by MWRD. The Stormwater Yes No Yes No Village lies Plan within the Des Plaines River watershed planning area of MWRD's comprehensive Stormwater Master Planning Program 12/9/2006 Capital 7/16/13 - 5 year Improvement Yes No No No CIP Plan Water and sanitary sewers, flood What types of capital facilities does the plan address? control, streets, public buildings and equipment. How often is the plan revised/updated? Annually Habitat Conservation No No No No Plan The Economic Development Commission is charged with reviewing all economic development Economic related Development Yes No Yes Yes programs and Plan incentives including tax incentives offered through the Cook County 6b program. 6/5/07 Shoreline Management No No No No Plan Response/Recovery Planning Comprehensive Emergency Cook County No No Yes Yes Management EMIRS Plan Threat and Cook County Hazard EMIRS Identification No No Yes No Preparing and Risk THIRA Assessment Cook County Terrorism Plan No No Yes Yes EMIRS Post -Disaster Recovery Plan No No No No Yes Continuity of Yes Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes: Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes' Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Cook County Operations No No Yes No Yes: Other Yes Staff with training in benefit/cost EMRS Plan analysis Surveyors No Public Health Personnel skilled or trained in GIS Yes Cook County GIS Consortium applications Cook County No No Yes No Plans Emergency manager Yes Fire Department/ Fire Chief Grant writers DPH TABLE: FISCAL CAPABILITY Staff/Personnel Resources Financial Resources Accessible or Eligible to Use? Community Development Block Grants Yes Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes: Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes' Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Yes: Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard -Prone Areas Yes State Sponsored Grant Programs Yes Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes: Other Yes TABLE: ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY Staff/Personnel Resources Available? Department/Agency/Position Planners or engineers with Who is your jurisdiction's floodplain administrator? (department/position) Community Development/ Director Public knowledge of land development Yes Works/ Village Engineer and land management practices Engineers or professionals trained Public Works/ Village Engineer in building or infrastructure Yes Community Development/ Building construction practices Commissioner Planners or engineers with an Yes Public Works/ Village Engineer understanding of natural hazards Staff with training in benefit/cost Yes Finance Department/Director analysis Surveyors No Personnel skilled or trained in GIS Yes Cook County GIS Consortium applications Scientist familiar with natural NO hazards in local area Emergency manager Yes Fire Department/ Fire Chief Grant writers Yes Community Development/ Director TABLE: NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE What department is responsible for floodplain management in your Public Works jurisdiction? Who is your jurisdiction's floodplain administrator? (department/position) Public Works/Village Engineer Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date of adoption of your flood damage prevention ordinance? 5/21/02, updated 9/20/11 When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community 3/30/1999 Assistance Contact? Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations No that need to be addressed? If so, please state what they are. Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood riskwithin your Yes jurisdiction? (If no, please state why) Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program? If so, what type of No assistance/training is needed? Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? If so, is your jurisdiction seeking to improve its CRS Classification? If not, is Yes/ No your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? NF1 P Participation Activities Maintaining compliance under the NFIP is an important component of flood risk reduction. All planning partners that participate in the NFIP have identified actions to maintain their compliance and good standing. Cook County entered the NFIP on April 15, 1981. Structures permitted or built in the County before then are called "pre -FIRM" structures, and structures built afterwards are called "post -FIRM "The insurance rate is different for the two types of structures. The effective date for the current countywide FIRM is August 19, 2008. This map is a DFIRM (digital flood insurance rate map). The communities in CookCountythat participate in the NFIP are shown in Table: NFIP Participating Communities in CookCounty in Volume I of the Cook County MJ -HMP. The NFIP makes federally -backed flood insurance available to homeowners, renters, and business owners in participating communities. The communities in Cook County that participate in the NFIP and their"Policies in Force Total Coverage;" and "Total Written Premiums" are shown in Table: Cook County Flood Insurance Policies in Volume I of the Cook County MJ -HMP. The following are NFIP-related activities completed by our community: • Our staff provide the following services: permit reviews, GIS, inspections, engineering capability. • My community teaches property owners or other stakeholders about the importance of flood insurance through public outreach events, workshops, and/or seminars. • Our community enforces local floodplain regulations and monitors compliance. • Our floodplain development regulations meet or exceed Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or State minimum requirements. • Mount Prospect holds an Emergency Management expo to discuss flood insurance on an annual basis. Substantial Improvement Rule and the Substantial Damage Rule The IDNR/OWR has developed a model ordinance for floodplain management, which has been adopted by most communities in Illinois. The ordinance includes the minimum requirements an NFIP participating jurisdiction must adopt and enforce, as well as additional higher regulatory requirements. The optional, higher regulatory standards include a minimum one foot of freeboard R above the base flood elevation and cumulative tracking of damage repairs and improvements to establish substantial damage and substantial improvement compliance. Some jurisdictions have chosen to exceed the requirements of the model ordinance and have adopted more restrictive ordinances. This is most common in the communities in northeastern Illinois. Existing Municipal Code: 22-102 Definitions SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT: Any repair, reconstruction or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the market value of the structure either: a) before the improvement or repair is started, or b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred. This term includes structures which were damaged whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its predamaged condition would equal or exceed fifty percent (50%) of the market value before the damage occurred, regardless of the actual repair work performed. For the purposes of this definition "substantial improvement" is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not, however, include either: a) any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure safe living conditions; or b) any alteration of a "historic structure", provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure". (Ord. 5253, 5-21-2002; amd. Ord. 5620, 4-3-2007; Ord. 5702, 7-15-2008) 22-109 Permitting Requirements Applicable to All Floodplain Areas In addition to the requirements found in sections 22.106, 22.107 and 22.108 of this article, for development in flood fringes, regulatory floodways, and SFHAs or floodplains where no floodways have been identified (zone A, AO, AH, AE, Al -A30, A99, VO, V1-30, VE, V, M or E) the following requirements shall be met: C. Protecting Buildings: All buildings located within a 100 -year floodplain also known as an SFHA, shall be protected from flood damage below the flood protection elevation. However, existing buildings located within a regulatory floodway shall also meet the more restrictive appropriate use standards included in section 22.107 of this article. This building protection criteria applies to the following situation: Construction or placement of a new building; Nonconforming structures may remain in use, but shall not be enlarged or substantially improved, unless the improvements include measures to bring the structure into compliance with this article; Installing a manufactured home on a new site or a new manufactured home on an existing site. This building protection requirement does not applyto returning a mobile home to the same site it lawfully occupied before it was removed to avoid flood damage; and Installing a travel trailer on a site for more than one hundred eighty (180) days. This building protection requirement may be met by one of the following methods: 7 1. A residential or nonresidential building, when allowed, may be constructed on permanent land fill in accordance with the following: a. The lowest floor, (including basement) shall be a minimum of two feet (2') above the base flood elevation; b. The fill shall be placed in layers no greater than one foot (1') deep before compaction and should extend at least ten feet (10') beyond the foundation of the building before sloping below the flood protection elevation. The top of the fill shall be above the flood protection elevation. However, the ten foot (10') minimum may be waived if a structural engineer certifies an alternative method to protect the building from damages due to hydrostatic pressures. The fill shall be protected against erosion and scour. The fill shall not adversely affect the flow of surface drainage from or onto neighboring properties. The design of the fill or fill standard must be approved by a registered engineer. 2. A residential or nonresidential building may be elevated in accordance with the following: a. The building or improvements shall be elevated on crawl space, stilts, piles, walls, or other foundation that is permanently open to floodwaters and not subject to damage by hydrostatic pressures of the base flood or 100 -year frequency flood. The permanent openings shall be no more than one foot (1') above grade, and consist of a minimum of two (2) openings. The openings must have a total net area of not less than one square inch for every one square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding below the base flood elevation; b. The foundation and supporting members shall be anchored and aligned in relation to flood flows and adjoining structures so as to minimize exposure to known hydrodynamic forces such as current, waves, ice and floating debris; c. All areas below the flood protection elevation shall be constructed of materials resistant to flood damage. The lowest floor (including basement) and all electrical, heating, ventilating, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and utility meters shall be located a minimum of two feet (2') above the flood protection elevation. Water and sewer pipes, electrical and telephone lines, submersible pumps, and other waterproofed service facilities may be located below the flood protection elevation; d. The areas below the flood protection elevation may only be used for the parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement. When the buildingwall encloses open space that is belowthe base flood elevation, gravity storm and sanitary sewer connections are specifically prohibited and overhead sewers are required for the sanitary connections and sumps for the storm sewer connections; e. Manufactured homes shall be anchored to resist flotation, collapse, or lateral movement by being tied down in accordance with the rules and regulations for the Illinois mobile home tie down act issued pursuant to 77 Illinois administrative code. In addition, all manufactured homes shall meet the following elevation requirements: (1) In case of manufactured homes placed or substantially improved: a) outside of manufactured home park or subdivision, b) in a new manufactured home park or subdivision, c) in an expansion to 9 an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, or d) in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on which a manufactured home has incurred substantial damage from a flood, the top of the lowest floor shall be elevated to or above the flood protection elevation; (2) In the case of manufactured homes placed or substantially improved in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, the manufactured home shall be elevated so that either the top of the lowest floor is above the base flood elevation or the chassis is at least thirty six inches (36") in height above grade and supported by reinforced piers or other foundations of equivalent strength, whichever is less; Their ordinance did not include substantial damage rule provisions; future updates will consider inclusion of these rules as applicable and as appropriate. TABLE: COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATIONS Participating? Classification Date Classified Community Rating System Yes 6 2018 Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Yes 4/3 2013 Public Protection/ISO Yes I 2 2009 Storm Ready Yes ! Gold (countywide) 2014 Tree City USA Yes N/A 2013 Opportunities to Expand and Improve Capabilities At this time, the municipality did not include or identify any opportunities to expand and improve capabilities. Plans will be updated in the future should this change. Plan Integration The capability assessment describes opportunities to "link" or integrate the mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms. The process and mechanism to identify opportunities to integrate the Cook County MJ -HMP into other planning mechanisms will occur during the Annual Update Process and be reflected in the Jurisdictional Annual Report each year. Specific plan integration opportunities will include: The hazards, goals, and actions of the Hazard Mitigation Plan will be considered in the next update of the Comprehensive Plan. Emergency Plan Integration: Cook County EMRS is supporting communities to develop and update their respective Emergency Operations Plans, Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Government Plan, and Recovery Plan in 2024. This is an ongoing countywide initiative and is being implemented in all municipalities. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) An EOP template was created for all municipalities. The 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP and the hazards in the mitigation plan have been integrated into the Situation and Assumptions section of the EOP. Within that section, the natural hazards based on the 2019 MJ -HMP were added in the Initial Analysis E and Assessment and Identification of Hazards section of the EOP. The hazards in the 2019 plan and the 2024 MJ -HMP did not change apart from adding wildfires for the Forest Preserve and unincorporated areas of the County. Future updates of the EOP will take into consideration any additional new natural hazards that are added to subsequent updates to the MJ -HMP. Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) The Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) for the municipality includes a Situation section that is based on the 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP jurisdictional annex, and specificallythe hazards identified in the annex. The COOP -specific risk assessment is hazard -specific and based on likelihood of occurrence and severity of impact. Recovery Plan The goals of the Recovery Plan were developed to align with the 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP, and specifically prioritizes the responsibility of officials under this plan to save lives, protect property, relieve human suffering, sustain survivors, repair essential facilities, restore services, and protect the environment. The plan acknowledges that hazard mitigation is an important priority and consideration during the rebuilding process. Jurisdiction -Specific Natural Hazard Event History The information provided belowwas solicited from thejurisdiction and supported by NOAA and other relevant data sources. The Natural Hazard Events Table lists all past occurrences of natural hazards within the jurisdiction. Repetitive flood loss records are as follows: • Number of FEMA -Identified Repetitive Loss Properties: 5 (5 Single Family) • Number of FEMA -Identified Severe Repetitive Loss Properties: 3 (3 Single Family) • Number of Repetitive Flood Loss/Severe Repetitive Loss Properties That Have Been Mitigated: 1 Federal Disasters Declared DR -227 .. 4/25/1967 Tornado DR -351 9/4/1972 Flood 7 DR -373 4/26/1973 Flood DR -509 6/18/1976 Severe Storm(s) DR -643 6/30/1981 Severe Storm(s) DR -776 10/7/1986 Flood DR -798 8/21/1987 Flood DR -997 7/9/1993 Flood DR -1129 7/25/1996 Severe Storm(s) DR -1188 9/17/1997 Severe Storm(s) DR -1729 9/25/2007 Severe Storm(s) DR -1800 10/3/2008 Severe Storm(s) DR -1935 8/19/2010 Severe Storm(s) 10 DR -1960 3/17/2011 Snow EM -3068 1/16/1979 Snow EM -3134 1/8/1999 Snow EM -3161 1/17/2001 Snow EM -3230 9/7/2005 Hurricane—Katrina Evacuation EM -3435 3/13/2020 Biological DR -4116 5/10/2013 Flood DR -4489 3/26/2020 Biological DR -4728 8/15/2023 Severe Storm(s) DR -4749 11/20/2023 Flood State Disaster Declarations TABLE: NATURAL HAZARD EVENTS 7/26/2010 Severe Storms, High Winds, Torrential Rain 1/31/2011 Winter Weather 4/25/2011 High Wind, Tornadoes, Torrential Rain 5/25/2011 4/18/2013 Severe Storms, Heavy Rainfall, Flooding, Straight-line Winds 4/20/2013 Assessment/ Event 4/21/2013 Number (if applicable) 4/25/2013 4/30/2013 1/6/2014 Heavy Snowfall, Frigid Temperatures 7/12/2017 Thunderstorms, Heavy Rainfall, Flooding 7/14/2017 Storm total rainfall 1/29/2019 Winter Storm 2/6/2020 Severe Storms 3/12/2020 — present (reissued COVI D-19 monthly) 2/16/2021 Winter Storms 2/1/2022 Winter Storms 8/1/2022 Monkeypox (reissued monthly through of Mount Prospect 10/28/2022) TABLE: NATURAL HAZARD EVENTS Preliminary Damage FEMA Disaster Type of Event D ate Assessment/ Event Number (if applicable) Narrative Storm total rainfall amounts included 5.05 Flood 6/9/2018 inches 3 miles northeast of Mount Prospect Hail and Severe - 7/7/2017 - Weather Severe Weather - 6/22/2016 - $50,000 in property Lightning, Hail, and damage. There was also a - 4/9/2015 Severe Weather lightning strike in Mount Prospect that set a 11 12 building on fire the morning of April 9th. Wind - 7/19/2013 - Flood DR -4116 ' 4/18/2013 $240,000 Flood - 7/23/2011 - Wind - 7/11/2011 $380,000 Tornado - 6/21/2011 - Winter Storm DR -1960 2/1/2011 $200,000 Flood DR -1800 9/13/2008 - Flood 5/22/2008 - Flood/Wind DR -1729 ' 8/23/2007 $1,210,000 Wind - 8/1/2003 - Wind 7/21/2003 - Wind - 5/11/2003 As the line of thunderstorms moved east into northeast Illinois, a bolt of lightning struck a tree in Mount Prospect. , The tree exploded into thousands of pieces, some of which were 3 to 5 Lightning and Severe feet long. One of these 1/22/2002 Weather large pieces struck woman walking her dog.'; Although she was critically injured, she recovered from her injuries. The flying pieces of the tree broke 3 windows and damaged garage doors and siding. Wind - 6/12/2001 - 13.5 inches of snow at Winter Storm 12/11/2000 Mount Prospect Wind - 8/6/2000 - Wind - 5/18/2000 - Wind - 4/10/2000 - Wind - 11/10/1998 - Wind - 8/24/1998 - Wind - 5/28/1998 - Wind - 9/29/1997 - Wind - 10/29/1996 - Winter Storm/Snow - 12/1994 - Winter Storm/Ice - 1/1994 - Wind 8/30/1993 - Wind - 7/2/1992 - Wind - 6/17/1992 - Flood 8/1987 - Flood DR -776 10/1986 - 12 Jurisdiction -Specific Hazards: Vulnerabilities and Impacts Hazards that represent a county -wide risk are addressed in the Risk Assessment section of the 2024 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. This section only addresses the hazards and their associated impacts that are relevant and unique to the municipality. Dam/Levee Failure: Levee 37- Is located along River Rd between Euclid Ave and Palatine Rd. There is the potential for failure of levee wall and pump system. The northeast section of our community is mostvulnerable if a failurewould occur. Levee 37 protects 300 homes, River Rd., and the surrounding local roads. Earthquake: Mount Prospect has Fuel Tank Farm located north of Oakton St. east of Busse Rd. The tank farm serves Ohare airport and surrounding areas. Flood: We experience localized flooding throughout the Village, especially in the unincorporated subdivision, Forest River, near Kensington and River Roads under the jurisdiction of Cook County and Wheeling Township (but Mount Prospect Fire Dept. responds to emergencies). In particular, the Des Plains River flooding limits our ability to evacuate and receive resources from the East. Levee 37- Is located along River Rd between Euclid Ave and Palatine Rd. There is the potential for failure of levee wall and pump system. The northeast section of our community is most vulnerable if a failure would occur. Levee 37 protects 300 homes, River Rd., and the surrounding local roads. Tornado and High Winds: Wind events are prevalent in the area and our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Mount Prospect has Fuel Tank Farm located north of Oakton St. east of Busse Rd. The tankfarm serves Ohare airport and surrounding areas. Snow: Our overhead power lines are vulnerable. 15.8% of the Vopulation is 65 years or older and this population has an increased vulnerability to extreme weather, particularly winter storms. Blizzards: Our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Ice Storms: Our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Severe Weather: Mount Prospect has Fuel Tank Farm located north of Oakton St. east of Busse Rd. The tank farm serves Ohare airport and surrounding areas. Severe Winter Weather: Mount Prospect has Fuel Tank Farm located north of Oakton St. east of Busse Rd. The tankfarm serves Ohare airport and surrounding areas. Families in poverty 931 3.7% People with disabilities 9,214 9.9% People over 65 years 17,647 18.9% People under 5 years 6,493 6.9% People of color 31,705 33.9% Black 3,387 3.6% Native American 457 0.5% Hispanic 13,865 14.8% Difficultywith English 6,550 7.5% Households with no car 1,705 4.6% Mobile homes 351 1% Data are from the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey. See methods formore information. The community evaluated whether vulnerability, and subsequently the potential impacts, in hazard - prone areas had increased, decreased, or remained the same for each natural hazard identified in this Hazard Mitigation Plan. Climate change, infrastructure expansion, and economic shifts that can 13 affect vulnerability were considered. For example, if planned development is in an identified hazard area or is not built to the updated building codes, it may increase the community's vulnerability to future hazards and disasters. On the other hand, if development occurred with mitigation practices in place, the vulnerability may have remained the same or decreased. Additionally, shifting demographics were taken into consideration when assessing development trends. Jurisdiction -Specific Climate Change Vulnerability and Impacts The table below outlines if climate change, as assessed by the local planning team, has increased or decreased the municipality's vulnerability/exposure, and thereby the potential impacts, to each natural hazard over the past five (5) years (Current Vulnerability), and the effect of climate change in the future probability of occurrence and impacts (Future Vulnerability) from each natural hazard. Future studies are needed to better understand the impact of climate change on the community's assets. Dam and Levee Failure Remained the Same Drought Remained the Same Earthquake Remained the Same Flood (Riverine, Urban, Shoreline) Remained the Same Severe Weather (Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail, Fog, High Wings) Increased Severe Winter Weather (Ice Storms, Heavy Snow, Blizzards, Extreme Cold) Increased Tornado Remained the Same Wildfire (Wildfire Smoke) Remained the Same Dam and Levee Failure No Change is Anticipated Drought No Change is Anticipated Earthquake No Change is Anticipated Flood (Riverine, Urban, Shoreline) Increase Severe Weather (Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail, Fog, High Wings) Increase Severe Winter Weather (Ice Storms, Heavy Snow, Blizzards, Extreme Cold) Increase Tornado Increase Wildfire (Wildfire Smoke) No Change is Anticipated Jurisdiction -Specific Changes (or Expected Changes) in Development Trends in Hazard -Prone Areas The table below outlines if development, as assessed by the local planning team, over the past five (5) years (Current Vulnerability) has increased or decreased the jurisdiction's vulnerability/exposure, and thereby the potential impacts, to these natural hazards, and the anticipated effects changes in development may have on the future probability of occurrence and impacts (Future Vulnerability) from these natural hazards. 14 Dam and Levee Failure Remained the Same Drought Remained the Same Earthquake Remained the Same Flood (Riverine, Urban, Shoreline) Remained the Same Severe Weather (Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail, Fog, High Wings) Remained the Same Severe Winter Weather (Ice Storms, Heavy Snow, Blizzards, Extreme Cold) Remained the Same Tornado Remained the Same Wildfire (Wildfire Smoke) Remained the Same Dam and Levee Failure No Change is Anticipated Drought No Change is Anticipated Earthquake No Change is Anticipated Flood (Riverine, Urban, Shoreline) No Change is Anticipated Severe Weather (Extreme Heat, Lightning, Hail, Fog, High Wings) No Change is Anticipated Severe Winter Weather (Ice Storms, Heavy Snow, B Blizzards, Extreme Cold) No Change is Anticipated Tornado No Change is Anticipated Wildfire (Wildfire Smoke) No Change is Anticipated There has been an increase population in our downtown area exposed or vulnerable to natural hazards. Hazard Risk Ranking The Hazard Risk Ranking Table below presents the ranking of the hazards of concern. Hazard area extent and location maps are included at the end of this chapter. These maps are based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this plan, and are considered to be adequate for planning purposes. TABLE: HAZARD RISK RANKING Rank Hazard Type 1 Severe Weather 2 Severe Winter Weather 3 Earthquake 4 Tornado 5 Flood 6 Drought 7 Dam Failure 15 a) 0- D IZT(14 O (14 a) L do c a) co a) U C O U co C O co no a) 14 N 0 0 a a) c a) L � O o .. a) � Q a7 O n: nam wO Q. N += O O cB p o a) as N O a-1 o L O O � � O � Q U Q *; .a E as +' O Wa000n m ,4 an _ cc U E i o ••O 'q O6. _0 O C � O -W L Vi O E — 4) i3 ++ w7 o m O — O O a) 1 ;+J o _ +o+ 0 oa 7 0 a) E a) o a U - n a O 0 O co 0- O E+ O O O co E CL'I LQ en co 0 0 0 O O O O c0 W V cy) —j2 —j M co Z E L Q 0 N 4.1 41 C (D 47 O Q O 4.0 carn cn V N = E U Q Q Oo ZEO r Z JO +, 0u I I O Vr 0 'y o X O CL m q) 'onCL to Oa _co �UII i NQO O ao © r 0 0 cwoo� o0UQ E c �o ++ p O r 3 o ua .F +g o f rn a) c aoio m_ N) V o 4.1 CO aoa 0 U o40 ami J U 0 &-Q. O 3 o O .y J a) .. Q N E a) CL II a) O O O }, m a3 m y O V y ++ p a) M U 'c 0 Q r '� a w �o D m u o o = - - - + L _ a% ami -0 O u Gi Z O wD wo, m as L sz O. O. cn o � o 'p .p m O = '^ E a) ++ ++ m a) bA to L -0 7 ca Q. Q. Q. o 'L a) (� C) o II II II �E'3a0a �aaaVaimQa0aa0zo > o caca c UJ a� � c 2 � O a) X O O _ (n !E, J U- C O Co+'� o E a) O b0 y 0- O co c W (L 0 n3 O V Q O N U ) Q co by — C N, a) a Li 0 a) U a) � O C (N O w w co N W U J ACV 2- CN J 2 2 > z a O C 4) V +, '~ a7 O O C ^ O N V a7 C U Q c J � a a o U t E to i N bu0 z O i U II p 0 0 (3 E •O N O = _ 0 V (D r o X Co CL a� wo _ co o = O a mcna0wZ a � o co y'a u :a oa o (� Q c E oaa� �w°�>E m+� co q o O °� =a o +=m = c V 3 0� c'>u�E U O=O� •y rn J 0 �� a �� o E a) QCL ° ?' to _ '� a E co c II 0 a� p' co CO 'r, m m m O y O O E .1, V(n Cc ++ p a� W �+ .N o E O O co = T E ++ \ a mw � bA !_ 2 mo by m_ ca2 co a� bAa) Ca aaacn �, o� a) c 0> O V cn m. z 0 a) E Y —, O to L .� J Q o I L y a a a Q a Q 0 c.) 'L p a i o m Q U a) U p II II II L) z o cc .o, U U a) O 0 - co O C 2 U O C O ca bA E bA C O bA C: 0 a) U) a) 4- a) O O_ 7 N O N a) bD C D 0 m c+ 41 bA EL (Q M > m to VLA L O O Q Q N += O L 2- LL Q. U r O O C =m O 0E m O � �. Yom.0 .E a) a)MIMI ++ {,A a) a) Co U) a .� UQ E E i 'O C C {+ O b0 ca co E - oa waLV In U)0 0 M o v _ uA Q ca O +J a =; , N N O. O O Q L = = a) = Ltis VA _ ++ U a) — O N O 7 C cB = ._ Q +J rn O "a 4-1 + __; c O O Ri O U M Q. _A..bA 'O a) G =ca O E c6 N Q.N Z ^ .. ++ � O — C' N ++ N ON mmf b�A a) ate+ 7, Lu U J > N J 2 O Lcn r a) D • - AR O = a) a-. _CL u = y O " VA N O O } E N w a7 L' 3_ , °W.0 V UvO . Z +• O.= = _ o� V O ; Q 2 U = N c = O a E° 7 3 E �' o L N M C O aOr _E' _ N0 O C a O II N= 0 V L1 QNCL N = r O > 41 VA O t N CL , .bn U O 0--+ N _ U r N 0 V N +bn +3+ O =j i N N i C U i W 0 9 J y E a) a U O CL +N+ Co= O 3 y t bD y Q. 3 N mN+ mw 0 in 0 ++ L = O; >. ,N O U — co N O = >, +CO a) sz _ +, a) b0 VA �' _ .3 = O L •Q �, L O N O U O a) Z O L O a) 00 O O Q% bA L co m O. O. O. O. O. N O O •L C _� 0 ++ N 0 0 +3+ 0 p II II L O o �' a o> a a a 0 a= m o a 0 a a U Z o 00 1= 2 U a O Z M v E7 i m rn .. > O O N O 4..+ O 2 U N — _ � Q 1 N U a) N U = i Cob Lo E a) aJ O ^ a) O N bD a i +J Lu V 0 0 ca c 0 y N +, v U a LL CD w C:4-1 O O 4-1 >' 0co co cq a) �-' 0 0 Laoami a� L);, LU U J (N > N M J 2 E O C O t' C a) 3 O O L OADar � 041 O () O a V N O Q 4J U UA W U a)+� E a) a o c +� ° L Q 0 Z 1 .O II O i N_ °'c IA V m C, p W O v •o X 4) Q. c0 = C a) ^ O C L a X C CL 7 bLA E O 0 co 0 +-� y 0 ° ++ o a cc a L O .- .. C y= 3 c' 'a a 0 ° y y � U Q > c vA ca � ai i E N 0 J O a) ++ aj +' O a) a) 0 4-1c0 > O +O+ d m O 0 W= 7 'a 3 d O .y J m bA O Q 3 N E 0 Q CL ° z d �' �' '� 'O Q' G E C II a) 0 CoCc * +J c6 ca y m V y ++ '0 a) ca , UO _ 0 2 ba) Q � � V 0 .0 Q �+ +� r . L � � a) in C i O V � U !Z a) O Z O ca O a) a) to L co °. G. G. cA O to 'L C � ++ M +3+ p E II II Y II to L - Sao>a��aaaoa=moaoaaozocc� O °. °. Q. O a) U O C) L O co rn T_d 0 N N � O t0 += O ca Un O 0- C: O E ca N N +' Qbn Q +' Q Q i O � {+ O bn C LU (L C4 ccn 0 co m m � i U clot oc co O 7 0 7 a U- U- c C: rm o ° � N p O O (6 y 0 EO OCV bn —w O O m C) N O � � 0- + W U {{} J O N > N J 2 2 ) O Qi Mi rf in 41 O O U CO ='a bOA Nl o o +' E QU o N' C ++ O o y bA z (D +J O_ _ Q u O O O U 'o X N C O = v = a� O = a 6 X 7 CL to O O =0 r co a) cn O O 'a N0 Q E C = O ° to= F V Q U' c m ca o a�0i a o _ > c ° °= ° r - c' =a 0 °��> o += c U o L m� �°� Mammo o U Q= 7 'a 3 0 .y J t W Q CL Q m O a O ar Q. G C II O p' d CO +J +, O O O N m E O N ++ 'p a) N O U _ ca W ZZto .Q .Q 0 Q Q. y O .y C ++ N +Q+ 'p II II Y II to y - i 0 �a0>�� O Q. G. G. O L) • (L O i 0aoaauz0cc� v O v L-O 0 N CO N a) Ci) a) " U) y to _ LL •+O—, E bA +'+O bbn O V Qc Q Ea) ,O O Obn bA C co C W (L 0 E +J V � cO Q 4-1 co ++ = LL a) ca ''�n Q L i a U- m 2 c 4 C: C: D O O U E N to O O O ca NLor -S N bA b.0 a) a; Lu U J N> M N J 2 2 O nJD E E O a) a) ++ 1C H 'V O = O .0 (, Q V 0 O O Q IM N' c ++ O i a bA E z N s +J u U' i N Q '= UA V = Q w O O O U •o X N Q O 2 v = a� O = a -6 - X 7 3 bA M 4.1 - O a) 0 = O y Q0 FUN•- • O'a aNQONO0 _ c =v a O c o V QCL = 7 'a 3 0 .y J t ba a) CL Q N E a) a O 0 D >' W. a 0 E c II bD a) 0' d Coa -W +� +, a) N m +, V Cc N . 'p a) N O U _bn bA = Q _•- •- O V++ aa) O O to11 O . to = +p p II IIO Sao>�� �aaaL)(L 0aoaaUz0 N 0 N N 2 li c "A 0 E C13+� a�bio v c o a _ a) a) i p a �+ p b waVOccn0 ° c m m � i p NQ 4-1 co ++ = LL a) ca Q C V U O a) 41 i a U- m 2 c 4 c � D O O U � a) bA t1 O E ++ y O NN C) N b0 b0 a) G W U J � N J 2 2 O V O; 0. — a) +' y C a� O > � O � p O Do w p rn 0 O O � E U Q O o ea O U z ,� L E p u �: i N o UA N 0 = Q to O 0 0 U 'o X N= C O = v C (D O O jL X C; 3 ULQ + O Q O co a) ++ cn o 0 'a o a a L o .� C y 0 Q U c' U' a c ° C (D ca O O N o ° i C i Q � O V .0 Q= 7 'a 3 0 .y J a) t W 0 CL +y+ O y E 0 CL °a ar Q' p 0 II a) mw d Ca 0 a) N O U 1�A C ca to 0 0 ca a) am Q U) O O to C Y O Sca0) aba)A � Ua=a mo<m<mu zII oII cII �o>� N N 00 M N io woo O ca i bA W += O 2 2 U- 0 - CD U C ca C a) = C •2 E R3 C13 v Q c +J E•� 0 bbn Q 0 co C LU (L O c O C a) O a) O _ cn Q c6 LL a) O nuo d ma Q 0 0 (D w � ° o =oc� a = a U- m4-1 0 o � a) bn 0 c6 Obn O O ca O' > m W U {{} J N > N J 2 2 O _ a _ ' V � 0 a� O O +' O o O •U o .. bOA W a 0 cn o O o _ N E Q o Q 0 z _'00 ,� �, �, � � U u (D i N_ O '= UA V = Q w= O O O U •o X N Q OCL 2 v = (D O = a X to 0 'a Q E 0 = O N= F V Q U 0 O O O N cN 0 = v > O coo °= c6 r t — 0' =a 0 o += c U o 1 U .L !R, m� �°� amMO o V CoCL = O a d o 'y J S bA a) Q. Q N a) O ar 0 Q. 0 0 C II a) 0 ' d CoCc +� +, M ca a) N m +, V in +� 'p a) N O U _ a3 a) U1p 0 as O. O. O. rn O '� C ++ N +O+ p I I I I Y II —: f a) bA L- 3D o>�� O �aaaoa=m Q. G. G. O a) 0aoaaozocc� 0 0 0 L O co M N i a1 : V} I a) � 'oA C6 f01 ca +- 7 C to as o QO Q c: a Q. � a) Cc Z Q. ,E •a) i O N O J co N 0) O U C UID a) Co i Ca 3 O 'a C � Co bA 6L 7 7' Ca bA '— C i a) U O — O O a) N .— C6 �i N ) "M c6 E Q. 'r, y 3 v r Q w U oN � o 3 EE a G N a1 � a 0 U< c c Z3 � c 'asci 0: cc i N M CC ca c +� 0 a5 c; o' c a) U) U r f� >_ CO C G V U c6 7 CL0 M �•`� 0 0 0 ++ C o 'O O E *' W$ C a) w a i ++ a) a) to � p O *' -j Q O > v Q a) a) -0 cn o -C-E wo.Ucn 7 c a) to — c6 O Y cu U E oc cn Q O LL L±co bA E C6 U O Y r i a) SZ cn O +1) 7 C a) U) c0 cn aovo�(D �� c Co C° > O U n a) .0 2— > C +�+ c6 p Co a) a) E +% to _ nn > Ecn C: cn W �.% J OCN > r r J J cn a) Q a' c to I I a1 A) O tx U C E O -0 a) a1 c _0 *' a}) (n' c +� Cc i cn p a) C w E O a) N o'er v O a ct S2 (� U ESQ D O 7 CoA 0 ++ U i O U O OU O Z vi O = V O a) a -0E II E+ ° o c O m x a) a as .E u �a O Q_ g c °) a0 ) U Q cnO E ++ Cc O cc C bA U C - +� Q ,� bA c +� c a) s cn , E E O J Co bA O O ++ Ci O O d) U v Q C -0 'N a) J a) � Q. O O cn c o0 Z$ C7 O C Q E II pco d Ca a) p O E ++ O ++Cc ,, ++ p E a) p a) + O U cc ca a) O a) �, N •O +_ 4) Q. V cn ++ to a) in co Uq v C a) a) C w Cl i o 0 o Q ++ +_ 'i m a) a) C C O v v Q. a) c� a1 Z O+ C ++: a) a) a) W p O Q. Q_ Q. N O bA C 7 +., cn O ++ p E II II CC6 Y �JQO> a) Ua i a) M Q_ Q. O V C Q.2m 0 Un T v a) QG v QQ.C.)z0 i O i a1 : V} I a) � C6 f01 ca +- 7 t to as o QO Q c: a Q. 'O O E a) Cc Z Q. ,E •a) i GD Cw0.Ucn N O J 0) t UID O 'a C f0' 6L 7 7' C6 LL C i a) O O a) �i N ) "M c6 E Q. 'r, y 3 v r Q w U oN 'c 3 EE a G N a1 0 U< c c 'asci 0: cc i N M CC c L N O c; o' U r cn C G V U c6 7 CL0 M a' 0 0 0 ++ C o Q O O U *' W$ C a) w a i ++ a) a) to � p O -j Q O > N 0 0 L c c O o -- o a) ao � CL cc n° _ N (7 U) ca : U) o a) c a) O CL cc p - C O a L N C O C to m ca d i _.o a) ._ E ho�� SIJ 4) y L O w a U c C� C 3, L '00' C O c U � a) ca U LL Q L � O a) � a) a) L- a) L 0 +0) 7 U a cn m � O O 0 > vJo a cn no c •N W VJ s= 00 S i S 'O 2—(n' N aJ � yN Q. ©. ccE O � � y L to y � L 0 O � � O m �+ W U 2 cj > N � 2 O N N O O i CL U O L C a) o CD'0 ( 3 ' A L O Lo> to O 0.y N= > N (D 2 2 > O N x a) p O I I � > ca ao .. Q C C N 41 � a) 0 y p 0 Q i' O 'N Q O 47 •� � O V ca o JZ W cn a) 2 O O 0 aoCL Ji bA S o J O. to r Q E U o s -cnO bA V p i p O O O U z a 0' 2 0 ° C m �a r .— L -0 0 11 a C 00) c o c O a_ X o CL ° a L ° .� 3 11 y o U C N r O pP +O' to a) ~> O co ° p' O Q ao E— SA co 0 a Co a) a) Q 4-1 =a ',�—j (� >_ > ++ ?� o �o +_ �, cc ++ C a) } y to C V y o 0 0 O 0 J � ca bA c O o +) ° 0 O O ojj CO 0- 3 0 W — + N O U J S 0) J1 3 y C a) a) y •O ++ 4l to Q- it co ' E; O O a) to �_ O O a) bA L O m O. ° O. ° O. ° 0 O 'i C 0 a) �'aJQO>���Q<T,LO) c >, a) � LU C N 3 w m 0 •°. 0 •°. 0 Q +_ _ no c L � 0 p_ a) c c °. Sin O 'L la0 C 0 O y� '� c z 0 C a) II II C6 Y JZ aaaoa=cooWTQOQaozo�� JZ JZ O y V O V D O 0 c o -- o ao � CL cc n° _ N ca : o a) O CL cc p - C O L N C O C to m ca i _.o a) ._ E ho�� SIJ 4) y L O w a U 3, L '00' C c ca U LL Q O a) a) L- a) L 0 +0) 7 U a cn O O 0 vJo a cn no c •N W VJ s= 00 S i S 'O 2—(n' yN Q. ©. ccE y L to M L 0 L �+ W U 2 cj > N n 2 2 O i CL L CD'0 L O O 0.y N= 7 O y CL (D N x a) p a) > ca ao .. Q C 0 y p J_ Q i' O 'N a) V ca o JZ W 2 0 0 aoCL Ji bA r o s -cnO o a 0' CL C 00) 0 g ° E — ca ^ V +, ° p' O Q +1 � SA _ O 0 O O J> +_ Co 1:bA ',�—j (� >_ L C. V cc O p L L 3 O 0 m O 'y J Y +s+ o 0 ° +°—, �� X 2 2 2 ?` c o nn O :N a1: W — + N O U c6 c6 c6 S6 >_ m y •O ++ 4l to Q- it co ' E; O O a) to �_ O O a) bA L O m O. ° O. ° O. ° 0 O 'i C 0 a) �'aJQO>���Q<T,LO) m— LO N a) l 'O E s= — O a) O '+� U � N 7 i � O Y C co O p bn L Q O *' a-. � O O *' a) N � c O aS L � a) O O CL m by •— C � O a= Q {= i S? bA _ � Q 0- O 7 ,_ O U 7 O - co Q a) a) uj U Z) co C: a) a) Z C � U 40 O O O U � � a) O +� bna) c6 Q U C: 7 a)N 2 Co O L a O J u tx Q) C _ � a) O Q �Eo a) o o a` aU Ewa c6 o 'o o o U �.� oZ -0 u 0 O CU x cc L •� II o c0 c w U) cc D ns a) a) c s 0 bn c V= o c a) o o CL n 7 y a) G. 0O E cc0O II o co , CL U bon Q c L N O Co -r v Q a) c o y •a) E Z O c a) O a s O a O o II II co Y a U Z 0�: �C, r a) C U a N l 'O L Q N � Q {= _ � Q 40 � O C: J Q c6 a) O +Q+ c6 y N O Co -r O' waVincn o U co m CL _r_ i L Q Q cn O O O 3 N : a U- (D 4-1 c � O OI O U U ca +Q+ O c0 0 a-% a) b0 M W (.� J �N Q J 2 O C' 3i O V' C i; L) O a) M N (D a r ° rn .°O L wo N V O O O a = v m = ' L 3 _ = o a +O—+' cn O +O L °a a co= L •— I0 O o N E — c a) = O +± co o = C V > C 19 co s O c U o •++ +' U L C y •L co QN 0> N ECo +' °tJ N (9O , W Q.7 Co m A . ° = a) a) m m U ca V a) =; C Q- � + co ca w cn cn Y y _ C Q_ ycn bco O O . CL 0. O �Ja0 O•0 Q. Q Q. O U O U 00 °aDaa N 4-1 2 O O Q U OQ QV o E} z C) U II o o X � � X c� o � " c _ 0 U Q woo�?,E N (D O O o N !_ E O �' pa) > E z O VzOcc� N 0 V m to N ++ N � co � a) U C (B C a) C � O O E 41 cn ++ p}' O co ` O O W 0.U13cn L a) O i U O C + (II t0 LL 40 p_ o Q o N U) M O O N U-4-1 O c p o a = O a) c O E -P w i (6 C �N bA a) r' W U J > N cl J 2 O 9 CL 4 +�+ N M O C V_ O 4- C p cU 47 � O +� E U Q N O O a7 O = N O m E U z •0 }I 4., •2 II Q i N O wo V 'a O CL _= a >'O Lo ° a O O co x o 0 0 m o a c a L- O m .r II c m m 3 m= U Q 4 _ D E = o c to >, E •O - Qi CD L 4-1 4 > 1 U A co A .J.� N � E+�Cc (j C O a) O (7 y J bA N Q 3 N a) C p �I p O . m co O O m O }, +O+ O S y ++ 'p +, a) O' }, CU co y � U � w cbo m r- = co o z 0 3 c O a� 00 O sZ sZ sZ w o s y o .o E a� 3ao`wZa�aaa0a=m oaoaa0zooc� N O O � N C O N 2 0 _ Q n3 � +' bA 4.1 n3 cU t ++ i a- •O O +J V L O �+ co O Co Q E bn N+, .O O Co 0 c W d c.i p Un O O T u% co Ui E N i V O o O O �' o O ++ = co N O O C 0 CL +O+ N m a� aLLU d 4-1 � — to O c o � O U 0to N C +O, 0 E ca c6 n3 O E ++ (U c Q Ll ++p r b0 a) � C '.. W C) J NN > C'7 0')—j 2 O O Ula UA •� 13 O o y Q V O O P V co a O � N N 0 •� , ., O 0 0 J L w U O >� U1 Z ... II i N O •= bA }' = 0 O O •� U X N cLo Q 2(D a0i O O o a a L E a+ 0^ = (� O �� a) co a; cn O �a o a a L O ,� II y -a o c OFVQ — c m a 0 = m o o woow? E .. 00 o — �' o '— p as ai O o a = O a+ 3 c 2 ++ b0 ++ ,_ N bn E _ m 0 N O y :+� 0 0 O V O 4 UU O C i 4-1 V L O .J� > O O LL O >O N O= 0 .y J t b0 Q. N (U a0 CL O ++ p U6 C II CU O p LL O co E N O U += O O ca C +y+ (U � Q- V ++ O w C 0 ( 'o Q Q Q U� O t = y 7 E > O � j� J a o> d j Q Q Q V a 2 m o Q Q a (� Z O ccco 00 N N v c a O o O O U X y a�-1 N }' 4 � O O a) cn c6 O bA + 4 >+ N +, O W O N O 2 IL �6 E 0 C:� °E o aUi a) U 7 w U_ _ R3 a� T CabD Y a) a) 2 E a) C13 +' +J n3 +, O O C cay 0 p a) O W (L U ocn O E v 2 E O O O a) O co E O a) ` C OO .. !? O Q fl N .— 41 V E c O >, C a)N O 7 O +J O Q O 4, O i O c0 bA ++ = U O O N a) O E co M O _ C C :a D U O_ O � N O 7 *O J O O U a) IL o O Q N' O a a a) (II U aoi �i-_ o O x Q � o a) O i) V (0a) a) o a) a) 4- cn C a� ca 0O 0 i cu o i a) Y j U >�� O E; O 7 b0 O O O` a) 7 a) 0 O ,� y M O O fbn el) C r O N +� b 0 O_ bbn y- W V ff} N i M a O 2 ax) .r 2 .0 o 33s 7 in m a) o c c 0+- O> '� C 2 O maN �' N O O U } E a) C N Q O: p _ , ,� O OO J bA Q V O �+ z II = = p uo� G O U CL 2ami = oX -rs t o �° E +° c = c6 Oa m CL aa)i c cn O O c a a i O II � y 'a_ c O •2 CL E —M o (D c O - m o m (� Q � to E a 0 o wa) > o c ca cc c U o i N 0Oo ++ ca 0 ba N E ap% 'i C u u uQ +' C o U sz a) z 0> bAm ca L Q. Q. y O t a) cn y 3 .O E a) >CC ca bOiD �D > O Q. Q IZ O i a) u a) V L_ p II II II Y iJQOz QQ V a2 i m O Qa QaVZOccFC-1 N N N a) C V a O M io o a) b`°a *= O 7 2 f LLa o C � ns cc bn rn o O J O CO n3 O O ca E O a) mr WaUocn o E O g C U V C a) o �_ O (nQ J +, O CL a� N r- Q Q.0 N 0 7> a OC m 2 *' LoO p U -? a) gy U p i UI cN CL U m o CL 7 9 0— 3— c O O O E CO C 7 O -� J O U 0 a) p O O O +J d +' C O t6 O= 7 b0 p U O X •O Z N O a) � ('') L L O O- n3 rZ O >� > c:Q O (i bA bA bA p (II U U !2 Lu U� Q COm NN > N 2 2 2 U J m ca O 3 ii r+ C' O U) cn O O '+ ibA y +J W U J Q v a) Q E 4+ Q C p v7 v7 N 0 O Q p y r •� c O L a bA >+ U E� Z +O+ I i N O U bA N V 'a =+� 0 0 O II o O a ._ c N O>� 3 c = a O U) _ ~ V C Q N c mrL O o °r m nuo = bA E Clq_ 0 p a p s o °� =a 0o o V ca _ (� O �' J bA as Q. y a) O ar _ •� C II a) p 0 ca }, co y CC O co O �, E +_ a) C a + 3 bA C o Z 0 UA >� O G. Q. Q. y O C � ai .( E > a) O bA i> a) G. G. Q. O 'i O O i +O—, u O U O p II II II o JQOZ �QQQ V aim O QD Qa0ZOGC� O M Cl) N a) V a M Oa O Ul O O LL O +J N 7 0 0 O ca > CDca ' 2 f D .� J p O° O O U E O p m (a >+ � O Q a. O U ca O C O O o O (D O Q O 0 O C 4- -0 N In w . C— 6 O w +O + C:O O O O O ED O +' 0 bn O +' Q 7 ) U c6 +� _0 O V O Q. aj •p M J c j O p 0 ++ ° O E > Er a O 0 O W a V a O U (6 O 0 z c O*� N 0 cc p U p O . bn Om O ca D Q V O >, a ° ca ca '0 C '04-1 O N U C > Q coOm ca O 7 U w �_ O O (0 _ d a) co CL Q O �� ° E1 - p �a C:r-i 0 7 E C O 7 a) _ c: Q W O O a LL m= v co a S ?, a o Tf C O ,4-1 � O E Q rn U O O 0 p O Q ca O ++ p>+ O Y O cn .� bn bA ca >+ O ++ bn 0 0 0 0 C O N ca p w Q O O Q O E V N L3 M° W U J N> M N f J 2 O O .� d Om a cn p p Fm-.� O N C (D V � OO p '+J J Q v 47 -O O OL U 0 bOA UJ O Q C C .O C } N O Q C° Z O 0 bu0 >+ U z _ �, sV a =_+= E 4-1 i N i m v O iU II O ° O a ( 0 O c ° U c °— ° CL E c +� co O ° O y p ° = VQ c m ?, E CD o _ ar 3 p a m ++ C s N o O 'a V O a_ w O O bA p V 3 0 f6 = Q 'a O 0 O .y J t b0 N Q. 3 N O O O a0+ T C O r-II O 0 O U +, O O O N m }, ° N ++ 'p O o� _ ° N .° �ZO� O _ ca Q U bAco,Q,Q,Qy O to L Cn c O Q. G. O '� O V O U 0 O II II II JQO CO O ao Qm0ZOcc� M i cu O LL z a) U) co m C O z N co U C 4) a) U cq Q a) N _ O E N N O 7 o E N 41 a)� ca O coC a) E a� ca a) N +� N co cB b co +1 U a O Q O a) U 7 c C 0 E O > Q o Oto a) Q co Q � U � E +U a) � a) > O Q E O co c6 Q > 0 a � E U O +J O cn Q E O Q a) a) J O 0 U bA � E om co co O O O O O U i cu O LL z a) U) co m C O z N co .Q Q Cca G L ca N ca (Y) M M I— U z }v O w 1 0 Ff s !ill, i it , R M W � w �'11�aE jI! 51, y LL J �,01 `�'� 11 W p, 0 H11Nof 'V U) qF 111 81 it gain W O V C [�E E�rJ _W ` 11. 1-m m HIM t� Vm <W ow a x r h ��� ' YY, o ° J F— Oq `rjk i� y ' rlv.�' ryr �r vo�`� I TH, W, SW a u 18 a � - 4 v2 ' v �I O va RS RuW9 4°awry c U- v 3 w, C�7 F�n � rad pa I tti u -> � ua'�? Epi i7 ,F�r LLI l r r �r A I wl Y� r, aNl M LO M M OD M RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE UPDATE OF THE COOK COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within our community; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes the importance of reducing or eliminating vulnerability to disasters caused by natural hazards for the overall good and welfare of the community; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2000, the U.S. Congress passed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 ("Act") which provided the legal framework for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mitigation, planning requirements for state, local and tribal governments as a condition of mitigation grant assistance emphasizing the need for pre - disaster mitigation of potential hazards; and WHEREAS, as a condition of future funding for mitigation projects, the Act requires jurisdictions to prepare and adopt a hazard mitigation plan to identify and address certain vulnerabilities that exist prior to and during a disaster; and WHEREAS, FEMA supports pre- and post -disaster grant funding through the Hazard Mitigation Plan Grant program, which has as a condition of funding eligibility, a requirement for jurisdictions to prepare and adopt a hazard mitigation plan; and WHEREAS, to maintain continued eligibility for FEMA mitigation grant assistance programs the Act requires a hazard mitigation plan be updated every five years; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Act's requirements, 125 Cook County jurisdictions engaged in the FEMA -prescribed mitigation planning process to prepare the 2024 Plan and its associated local hazard mitigation plan annexes; and WHEREAS, the 2024 Plan has been approved by the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region V. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACTING PURSUANT TO ITS HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect hereby accepts, approves and adopts in its entirety, Volume 1, the Countywide Mitigation Actions in Volume 2; and the Village of Mount Prospect Jurisdictional Annex of Volume 2 of the 2024 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect will continue to participate in the updating and revision of the 2024 Plan with another plan review and revision to occur within a five-year cycle, and designated staff will provide annual progress reports on the status of implementation of the 2024 Plan to the Mayor and Board of Trustees. SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PASSED and APPROVED this day of February, 2025. Paul Wm. Hoefert Mayor ATTEST: Karen M. Agoranos Village Clerk