Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.1 Motion to accept proposal for preliminary engineering services (Phase 1) for the Central Road Railroad Crossing Improvements Project for an amount not to exceed $399,940.Page 5 Village of Mount Prospect February 5, 2024 21. Develop a public outreach program including at least one public meeting that meets the Phase I Engineering requirements to engage affected stakeholders, solicit input from the community, and keep interested people apprised of the study. 22. Prepare preliminary cost estimates for Phase 11 & III Engineering. 23. Identify potential funding sources for Phase 11 & III Engineering. Tentative Schedule Submit Technical & Cost Proposals February 26, 2024 Select consultants for interview March 8, 2024 Consultant interviews Week of March 18, 2024 Select consultant March 29, 2024 Award contract to consultant April 16, 2024 Kick -Off Meeting with Village Staff May 1, 2024 Complete Phase I Engineering TBD by Consultant Page 6 Village of Mount Prospect February 5, 2024 Exhibit C Project Location/Limits Map Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Central Road Railroad Crossing Phase I Engineering Study Location: Area around Central Road at its At -Grade Crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks including the intersections of Central Road with Northwest Highway (US 14) and Prospect Avenue. Project Location Map on next page. Q co C O u U O J 4+ U S_ O L CL V v Q Page 8 Village of Mount Prospect February 5, 2024 Exhibit D Excerpts of Past Plans Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Central Road Railroad Crossing Phase I Engineering Study Location: Area around Central Road at its At -Grade Crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks including the intersections of Central Road with Northwest Highway (US 14) and Prospect Avenue. Excerpts of Plans attached separately: Downtown Implementation Plan — 2013 Northwest Highway Corridor Bicycle Facilities Plan — 2012 Mount Prospect Bike Plan — 2012 M+awn �'xytlts=e Item Cover Page Subject Motion to accept proposal for preliminary engineering services (Phase 1) for the Central Road Railroad Crossing Improvements Project for an amount not to exceed $399,940. Meeting August 7, 2024 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD Fiscal Impact (Y/N) Dollar Amount Budget Source Category Type Information Y $399,940.00 Capital Improvements Fund VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Action Item Partnering with appropriate government agencies to resolve troublesome intersection issues is a key component of the Mount Prospect Strategic Plan. One such location is the area surrounding the Central Road at -grade crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad. This includes the railroad crossing and the intersection of Central Road with Northwest Highway (US 14) and Prospect Avenue. These intersections act as the western gateway to downtown Mount Prospect. Pedestrian and bicycle accommodations at these intersections are minimal and require long crossing distances. Vehicle delays are primarily due to the crossing being activated by trains, but the left turn movement from eastbound Central Road onto northwest - bound Northwest Highway (US 14) is particularly problematic due to limited storage for vehicles turning left. Central Road and Northwest Highway (US 14) are under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Prospect Avenue is under local jurisdiction. The traffic signals at Central Road and Prospect Avenue as well as Central Road and Northwest Highway (US 14) are owned and maintained by IDOT. The railroad crossing signals are owned and maintained by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). Improving pedestrian and bicycle facilities, enhancing safety for vehicles crossing the railroad tracks and traveling through the intersection, improving truck turning movements, addressing blocked through lane concerns on eastbound Central Road at the tracks, and enhancing the esthetics within the project area are primary goals of the project. Staff is seeking to enter into a contract with a consulting engineering firm for Phase I Preliminary Engineering services to facilitate final design and construction of the improvements. The 2024 Village budget has allocated funds for preliminary engineering services. Reauest for Proposals A Request for Technical and Cost Proposals for engineering consultant firms to provide preliminary engineering services was posted on the Demandstar bidding website. Four (4) consulting engineering firms responded and submitted Technical and Cost Proposals. Firms were asked to submit the following information as part of their proposal: 1. Resumes of key personnel and related experience on similar types of projects. 2. Summary of the firm's approach to the project. 3. Staff hours estimate and cost proposal for major phases of work. 4. Project schedule. Key tasks that are identified to be performed include: 1. Collect vehicle counts, pedestrian counts, and crash data, along with other pertinent information as necessary. 2. Perform topographic and right-of-way surveys. 3. Perform intersection design studies and other traffic studies as required by IDOT. 4. Review the existing pedestrian infrastructure and provide recommendations to enhance safety and to create a complete pedestrian network. 5. Evaluate bicycle connectivity within the project area, including bicycle facilities separated from both vehicles and pedestrians where possible. 6. Evaluate and modify the timing program as necessary to improve traffic flow in the downtown. 7. Evaluate extending the eastbound left turn lane on Central Road through the railroad crossing to prevent turning vehicles queuing in the eastbound travel lane on Central Road. 8. Incorporate landscaping, wayfinding and gateway treatments into all alternatives. 9. Develop a comprehensive alternative analysis report based on the tasks outlined above that will increase pedestrian and bicycle access, enhance safety, and improve the operation of the crossing and intersections for the long-term based on quantitative analysis. 10. Coordinate with Village staff, IDOT, UPRR, ICC, businesses, and the community. 11. Prepare preliminary cost estimates for Phase II & III Engineering. 12. Identify potential funding sources for Phase II & III Engineering. 13. Obtain approval of a Project Development Report from IDOT in order to proceed to Phase II Engineering. RFP Results The consulting firms' Technical and Cost Proposals were reviewed based on their understanding of our goals and their methodology of the design process. They were rated (with a maximum score of 100 points) according to these specific categories: company background, experience, scope of work, schedule, work effort, and proposal content. The rankings are: Technical Pro osals Category Max Points HDR Patrick Michael Baker GSG Background 20 19 18 18 15 Experience 20 19 18 18 15 Scope 25 24 22 18 16 Schedule 15 14 14 14 8 Work effort 10 10 10 8 8 Content 10 10 10 10 9 Total 100 96 92 86 71 Cost Proposals Firm Hours Total Cost Cost / Hour* HDR 2,672 $399,940.00 $143.24 Patrick Engineering 2,037 $357,064.00 $168.75 Michael Baker Intl. 6,668 $1,313,471.00 $191.49 GSG 2,348 $337,690.00 $133.79 *based on labor costs Discussion HDR, Inc. has put together a very strong project team with experience in preliminary engineering for several at -grade railroad crossing and roadway improvement projects. They have a very experienced professional engineering staff with a thorough understanding of the project coordination, communication, and documentation needed to successfully accomplish the project. The firm also has extensive experience working on IDOT and Union Pacific Railroad projects and understands their processes and requirements for obtaining preliminary engineering approval. HDR, Inc. has performed railroad crossing studies for the City of Wheaton, Lake County Division of Transportation, Kane County Division of Transportation, Chicago Department of Transportation, Cook County Department of Transportation, and Illinois Department of Transportation. It is staff's opinion that HDR, Inc. will provide the best product and has allocated appropriate work effort to this project (2,672 hours). Phase I Preliminary Engineering is expected to take two years to complete. It is also staff's opinion that HDR, Inc., has requested a reasonable fee for their services. A comparable project to the Central Road Railroad Crossing Improvements, based on estimated construction cost, is the Rand -Central -MP Intersection Improvements. The Village paid $365,000 for a Phase I Study based on the original construction cost estimate of $6,200,000. The Phase I Study was 5.9% of the original construction cost estimate. The Phase I Study for the Central Road Railroad Crossing Improvements is $400,000 based on an estimated construction cost of $6,300,000. The Phase I Study cost is 6.30/0 of the estimated construction cost. The higher percentage can be attributed to two factors. First, the Union Pacific Railroad and Illinois Commerce Commission will be key stakeholders in the project and require significant coordination. This is in addition to IDOT, which owns and maintains the affected roadways and traffic signals. Additional hours are necessary for meetings and reviews. Second, IDOT requires more information in Phase I studies compared to years past, including the Rand -Central -MP Intersection Improvements. For example, sidewalk ramp design, noise analysis, and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) plans were part of Phase II Engineering on past projects but now are required to be done in Phase I. Additional hours are necessary for survey and design. Phase I Study costs are typically 8% - 10% of the estimated construction cost. At 6.30/0, this cost is below the typical range and is reasonable for the scope of work. Alternatives 1. Accept proposal for preliminary engineering services for the Central Road Railroad Crossing Improvements Project. 2. Action at the discretion of the Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal from HDR, Inc. of Rosemont, Illinois to provide preliminary engineering services for the Central Road Railroad Crossing Improvements Project for an amount not to exceed $399,940. Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Central RR Xing RFP 3. HDR Technical Proposal 4. HDR Cost Proposal 3 N ow c �L W OJ fa Q t m CL � I tuo � O •vi m O C U � m O L .m cc m O L V VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CENTRAL ROAD RAILROAD CROSSING PHASE I ENGINEERING STUDY JAll'Y 26 WWI in uri I roIon�r February 26, 2024 Mr. Jason Leib Deputy Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect 1700 W. Central Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Submitted via eirnafill to jlleibCr)irnoii.iirntlpiroslpect„oir,g on Monday, I1:::e1bruairy 2 tlhn irno hater tlhairn ,.SIP RE: Request for Technical & Cost Proposals Central Road Railroad Crossing Phase I Engineering Study Dear Mr. Leib: HDR wants to continue our partnership with the Village of Mount Prospect (the Village) to deliver the Central Road Railroad Crossing Phase I Engineering Study focusing on developing achievable solutions that are consistent with the Village's vision — to be an exemplary, livable, resilient, and socially vibrant community in the region that is timeless yet contemporary. The Central Road Railroad Crossing Phase I Study offers the opportunity to move the Village's vision forward. At HDR, we are well positioned to assist the Village as we bring you: An 111!'I Manager Jeff Young, as your Project Manager with nearly 30 years of experience, has a history of evaluating improvements along and adjacent to Northwest Highway that includes the Arthur Avenue crossing In Arlington Heights as well as the Maplewood Extension Phase I Study for the Village of Cary creating a new frontage road south of the Union Pacific railroad tracks. iii��ictensive 1114r6asie IIII 1114rr1p �aot 111111':�xperiiilencem HDR has extensive Phase I project experience involving State routes and railroad crossings that includes vehicle and pedestrian/bicycle crossings, most recently being conducted for the IDOT IL 120 PEL/ Phase I Study in Lake County. III'irroven Uinion Iliiii',9liii:nfic w'A'i�iiiordinatiari,� IlllcPe mem::r,!!�. We are a partner with local experience that includes a detailed understanding of critical stakeholders such as IDOT and the Union Pacific Railroad. Jeremy Miller, the former Manager of Track Maintenance and Construction for Union Pacific in Illinois, will help identify and facilitate needed engagements to keep the project moving forward. We have developed a cost effective, stepped approach to this project limiting the resource exposure of the Village in an effort to reduce risks and costs. Task 1 will be to engage, at a high-level, key stakeholders regarding potential alternatives. Task 2 will be the remainder of the Phase I tasks needed based on the conclusions developed during Task 1. At HDR, we listen first to help you achieve your vision and we are excited about the opportunity to submit on this project and look forward to being a part of your team. Should you have any questions, please call me at 773.380.7943 or e-mail me at jeffrey.young@hdrinc.com. Sincerely, HDR ENGINEERING, INC. Jeff Young, PE, PTOE Project Manager 9450 West Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosemont, Illinois 60018 'T'773380.7900 IF 773380 7979 Thomas M. Hein, PE Vice President & Area Manager I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintlrall RoadIRaiilllroaad CIrossiiing IPIluase II 11i.inginneeln i ng StStudyII I 1. FIRM OVERVIEW At HDR, we do things right to make great things possible. Our multidisciplinary experts embrace opportunities to push boundaries and create new frameworks that can transform communities. For more than 100 years, we've created transportation, water, sewer and electric systems that modernize communities. Today, we design integrated systems, sustainable infrastructure and intelligent buildings that optimize operations and maximize cost savings. HDR has been recognized as a Top 5 Midwest design firm by Engineering News Record (ENR), and we are proud of our 105 -year history providing world class engineering, architecture, environmental and construction services in the Midwest. What started in Omaha, Nebraska, in 1917 has grown to over 12,000 professionals across 250+ offices worldwide, including four offices in Illinois. We live and work alongside our municipal clients, engage our network to meet project schedules and build custom teams to tackle nearly any challenge municipalities face. is" HDR has more f 5.2"o—z' GEWALT HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC. I SURVEY LEAD & TRAFFIC COUNTS We are partnered with Gewalt-Hamilton Associates (GHA) to have them perform the traffic counts and field survey work. HDR and GHA have collaborated over the years on several projects and is a trusted valued partner. They have become an extension of our staff making all work being performed seamless. 88 8 i-110,11" eXI-11 ..................F �.............. . 1 196 Local professionals with the.skil ............... ...................r................. r our approach to each situation. 8` work by designing smart f................... F 81 f.............����f Ihididinic.coiruv I At HDR, we sio tlums right to make great things gossihle. 03 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Centlrall Road Railroad Clrossiii ng Phase II 11i.irngillrneeini ng II Study I 2. PROJECT TEAM Our organizational structure is built to serve the Village of Mount Prospect as a true extension of staff. We have assembled a team with specialized expertise, experience, and flexibility to meet the project objectives. Jeff Young, your Project Manager, has over 28 years of experience leading planning, traffic, and Phase I projects. Jeff has the experience presenting before Village Boards on high profile projects including the first roundabout in McHenry County, the Algonquin Bypass, and the Ackman Road extension where he sat at a resident's kitchen table discussing the project listening to their concerns. All of these projects were successfully delivered under Jeff's supervision. Jeff will bring the same energy and dedication to the Central Road Railroad Crossing Phase I Engineering Study project. Our key personnel is fully committed to the project for its duration — regardless of what happens, we're here, bringing together the right talent to help you develop the right solutions for your community. Resumes of key personnel to be assigned to this project are included on the following pages. JEFF YOUNG, PE, PTOE E>�> iu 0 i. ..I BEN ZEMAN, PE �� C �.(III'k.IIIIIC III1W..A' IIIIIICC..0"" ..U..FAM Safety UIPRIR Coordiinatiion l::'undiiing MICHAL MICZEK, PE JEREMY MILLER NATE MACEK, AICP IRoadway ERIC NEUBAUER. PE 1i`ranspoirtatio n Planning JULIE HOBERG i"'raffiic JASON MAN, PE IPu lblic Outreach/ Strategic Coirrrnrnuniicat.iorns SCOTT MANNING 11 raiinage Analysis I' Permiittiirng EMILY GRIMM, PE, CFM 11:::nviironirneintA JANICE REID, PTP Utiilliitiies Coordinator JON KJELLMAN, PE I....andscaping/Aestlhetiics HELEN LIN, PLA S ua irvey JONATHAN PAST (Gewalt Hamilton, Inc.) 6- Indicates key personnel Ihidiriiii-im. couv-u I At HDR, we do fmngs right to make great thfngs go ssihle. 04 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Civil and Enviironrrrental Engineering, l..)nivcrsiI_y of Wisconsin Madison, 199 REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer, II...., #;1062 05 033,200'1 Professional Engineer, IA, P26107, 2020 Professional 1 raffic Open tions Engine e.r, II...., #14978, 2020 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS InshkAe of Transportafion Frigineers, I'asl Presiderrl (Illinois Section, Midwest District) I l E (,rear: I....ake s Di tri(A Director International Boc7rd of Direction , 2021 )023 Public Agency Council Chair, 2016 2018 American Public Works Associal:ion I 1 F Illinois Section PROFESSIONAL AWARDS 1 1 F Illinois Section .John I_al'lan[e Award, 1011 & 20)22 INDUSTRYTENURE 28 Years HDR TENURE 4- Years I II Villlage of Mount Prospect ( Ceintrall Road IRaiillroad Cirossiiing Phrase II Ili.ingirneeining II Study I Jeff Young, PE, PTOE Project Manager Jeff is a Transportation Project Manager with 28 years of experience delivering safe, reliable, and economical infrastructure to a variety of clients through collaboration and innovation. His specialties include transportation planning and design studies for all users in addition to traffic impact studies, safety studies, and intersection evaluation. Having worked at McHenry County for over 16 years, he oversaw the McHenry County Council of Mayors program. He directed staff managing the local STP program and collaborated with appointed and elected officials at all levels representing McHenry County on the Council. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Village of Mount Prospect, Railroad Crossing Alternatives Feasibility Study, Mount Prospect, IL. Quality Control. The Village of Mount Prospect selected HDR Engineering to perform a feasibility study to improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, commuters, and motorists moving through the Village's downtown area. Special attention will be given to the Union Pacific railroad tracks adjacent to downtown that also serve the Metra Commuter heavy rail service for the Chicago region evaluating at -grade crossings, station platform locations, and the potential for a roadway grade separation with the tracks to meet the Village's goals. Jeff assisted with quality control so that the deliverables were addressing the needs of the project. McHenry County Division of Transportation, 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), McHenry County, IL. Project Manager. Initiated during the pandemic and facing rapidly evolving transportation technology and a desire to address the needs for all, McHenry County received state and federal funding to update their LRTP within a 2 -year period. HDR, with its vast array of experts in sustainability, transportation planning, technology, and public communication, will meet the needs for developing the LRTP for McHenry County within the grant schedule. The project will also address the needs of stakeholders that seldom are heard from through effective public engagement that includes easy to use online tools, virtual workshops, and in-person pop-up meetings engaging the public where they gathered. The process engaged the whole of McHenry County bringing people and groups together with different backgrounds and needs to develop a cohesive plan addressing the needs of all. Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways, Phase I Studies - Various, Cook County, IL. Project Manager. HDR was selected by CCDOTH to conduct Phase I engineering for various projects. Projects include Vollmer Road viaduct between Kedzie Road and Western Avenue in the communities of Olympia Fields and Flossmoor and the Burnham Multimodal Connector (BMC) in the Village of Burnham. Both projects involve railroad coordination and the BMC involved coordination with both the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) and IDOT. A pedestrian and bicycle feasibility study was also performed to help link the communicates of River Forest and Maywood across the Des Plaines River along two corridors (one under IDOT's jurisdiction) that currently do not provide for non -motorized travel developing Road Diet alternatives. Project tasks include alternatives analyses, complete street analysis, traffic and safety studies, drainage studies, structural analyses, environmental evaluations, and public involvement. Illinois Department of Transportation, Phase I Studies for IL 120 (PTB 195-13), Lake County, IL. Project Manager. HDR is preparing preliminary engineering environmental studies for the improvement of Illinois Route 120 in central Lake County. Services include environmental studies, Intersection Design Studies, geometric studies including ADA evaluation of pedestrian facilities, crash and safety analysis, signal warrant analysis, public involvement, facilitating a Community Advisory Group, and a project website. Jeff was responsible for the day-to-day activities for the project so that deliverables, timelines, and budget goals were achieved. McHenry County Division of Transportation, Lakewood Road Shared Use Path and Miller Road Intersection Preliminary Engineering, McHenry County, IL. Project Manager. HDR was selected by McHenry County to develop Phase IIsdidirix„acoiv-i I At HDR, we do [Y)ings right to rnake great thrngs possible. 05 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Celnflrall Road IRaiilllroaad Clrossiiln,g Ilalluase II Ili.in,ginneeining Study II I l e ff "119fo utig lllc ir�i� nt�inued) I engineering for the Lakewood Road Shared Use Path and Miller Road Intersection. As a part of the shared used path, a structural crossing of the Kishwaukee Creek through culvert improvements or a new pedestrian bridge will be provided. In addition to the pedestrian improvements, roadway restoration will be performed and the intersection at Muller Road will be evaluated to determine a preferred alternative for traffic control. Documentation will be prepared to keep the project eligible for federal funding. The project will address congestion, safety, mobility, transportation options, and the environment. Jeff was responsible for project oversight so that the clients' goals were being met. Village of Cary IL, Maplewood Extension Preliminary Engineering Study, Village of Cary, IL. Project Manager. HDR was selected by the Village of Cary to conduct a Preliminary Engineering Phase I for a new roadway (Maple n ood Extension) linking Cary -Algonquin Road to the Metra Commuter Parking lot and Main Street. The project will evaluate roadway geometry, pedestrian and bicycle needs, environmental impacts, and a redevelopment of a former school site. The project will also coordinate with Metra regarding potential modifications to the commuter parking lot for the train station. Project tasks include alternatives analyses, complete street analysis, traffic and safety studies, drainage studies, environmental evaluations, and public involvement. The project will be processed to be eligible for potential future federal funding. City of McHenry Comprehensive and Downtown Plans, McHenry, IL. Project Manager. HDR has been selected by the City of McHenry to develop citywide and downtown comprehensive plans. The development of an effective plan is to engage all of McHenry to build a vision for the city's future. Community leaders, downtown business merchants, high school students, elected officials, and the public will be engaged through a myriad of tools that includes classroom interaction, individual interviews, project website, design charrette, public meetings, and pop-up meetings by attending community events. The plans will identify the goals, recommendations, and strategies that city staff can use to carry forward the city's vision for the future. Illinois Department of Transportation, Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) and Phase I Studies for IL 120 (PTB 195-13), Lake County, IL. Project Manager. HDR is conducting a Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study in addition to a Preliminary Engineering Environmental Study for the improvement of Illinois Route 120 corridor in central Lake County. The PEL will span 9 miles from IL Route 60 to Almond Road. Two at -grade railroad crossing will be evaluated that are adjacent to signalized intersections for improvements and/or grade separations. Upon the conclusion of the PEL, the eastern portion between Atkinson Road and Almond Road will move into the NEPA Phase I Study. Services include environmental studies, Intersection Design Studies, geometric studies including ADA evaluation of pedestrian facilities, crash and safety analysis, signal warrant analysis, public involvement, facilitating a Community Advisory Group, and a project website. Key to the project is developing goals that meet the needs of the local community and that of the State's LRTP including mobility, resiliency, and stewardship. Jeff is responsible for the day-to-day activities for the project to ensure deliverables, timelines, and budget goals. Illinois Department of Transportation, Phase I Studies for 1-290 Bridges (PTB 169-16), Cook County, IL. Project Manager. As a subconsultant to Lin Engineering, HDR is preparing preliminary engineering environmental studies for the improvement of seven bridges along the 1-290 corridor in Cook County. Services include environmental studies, Intersection Design Studies, geometric studies including ADA evaluation of pedestrian facilities, crash and safety analysis, signal warrant analysis, a Traffic Management Plan, and peer review of bridge condition reports. The project also included a Road Diet for Ogden Avenue to improve non - motorized travel along the corridor. Jeff was responsible for the day-to-day activities for the project so that deliverables, timelines, and budget goals were achieved. Champaign -Urbana Mass Transit District, The Yards Project, Champaign -Urbana, IL. Traffic Lead. The Champaign -Urbana Mass Transit District (MTD) operates public transit service in east central Illinois in the cities of Champaign and Urbana, and the Village of Savoy. The Yards is a joint development project carried out by MTD, a private developer, and the City of Champaign. The Yards will renovate and expand MTD's multimodal center, Illinois Terminal, and add a mixed-use facility for expanded bus platforms, parking, and commercial space. The project footprint is about 7 acres. The current conditions of the project area are surface parking lots and the Illinois Terminal facility. An Environmental Assessment (EA) was completed receiving a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The development will utilize Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding for construction and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process was carried out according to FTA requirements. Jeff was responsible for analyzing the traffic, parking, and nonmotorized travel demand for the project. INOIN-11ICIDIR 11EX113IIG°IllklllIll.INC llfii; McHenry County Division of Transportation, Woodstock, IL. Assistant County Engineer. Jeff's major responsibilities included: • Oversee Planning, Design, Construction, GIS, IT, Communications, and Administration for the Division of Transportation • Develop annual budget with $7 million operating and over $40 million capital • Collaborate with key elected and appointed officials at the state, county, and local levels presenting before elected bodies and the public regarding projects • Oversee public outreach and presentation materials • Manage land acquisition for capital improvement projects • Review of consultant work products (roadway plans, traffic studies, and reports) • Oversee the CMAP McHenry County Council of Mayors STP -Local program. Illiru-u I At HDR, we do U)ings right to rnoke great thrnn po ssih/e. 06 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Illinois In>tiuAc of Fechnology, 2004- E,�7chclor of Arts, E ngineering Science, PenedicLine University, 2004 REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer, Illlnols, 11062.061255, 2008 I....EED Accredited Professional Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment:. Control PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS American Council of Englneerin Companies Environment�)l Corny-nittec: Illinois Association of Environmental Prr fessioi4sa INDUSTRYTENURE 20 Years HDRTENURE 2 Year I II Vil1lage ofMount Prospect ( Cerrtirall Road IRaiilliroad Cirossiing Phrase II 11i.n,giineeining. II Study I nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Jim McNally, PE, LEED AP, CPESC Project Principal Jim is a Senior Transportation Engineer with extensive project management experience. His work has varied from Phase I and Phase II roadway geometric design to permitting, stormwater management and erosion/sediment control design. Jim also has experience leading public involvement and visualization services. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Lake County Division of Transportation, Fairfield Road PEL, IL. Project Manager. Over 9 miles of roadway are being studied, including 17 intersections, for safety and traffic improvements with fifty percent of the adjacent land currently being farmed with the potential to be developed. The study wul consider current and future travel demand, enhance north/south mobility in western Lake County, grade separation at IL 134 and will address safety concerns while being sensitive to the surrounding environment. The corridor includes the following: 1) 3 separate floodways - Round Lake Drain, Manitou (formerly Squaw) Creek, and Lake Helen Drain; 2) 7 separate flood plains; 3) over 30 Lake County mapped wetlands; and 4) the Four Corners watershed which is a large depressional storage basin. Additionally, Section 4(f) parkland properties with potential Section 6(f) impacts are located adjacent to Fairfield Road at various locations along the Corridor. Roundabouts are being analyzed at three of the intersections along the corridor. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, Local Roads Safety Plans, Riverdale and Calumet City, IL. QC Review. HDR evaluated the crashes that caused severe injuries and developed mitigation strategies and safety improvements to help reduce the number or severity of those crashes. Crash analysis and safety mitigations for each location were coordinated with CMAP and Calumet City. HDR also developed and implemented a public engagement plan to solicit feedback from residents and key stakeholders. As part of the public engagement, HDR developed paper- and web -based surveys to identify perceived safety concerns and understand what types of safety improvements are desired by the community. HDR developed planning level estimates of cost and quantified benefit based on expected crash reduction for each improvement, which were used to develop Benefit -to -Cost Ratios (BCR's) to identify cost effective safety improvements. Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways, Phase I Studies - Various, Cook County, IL. QC Review. HDR was selected by CCDOTH to conduct Phase I engineering for various projects. Projects include Vollmer Road viaduct between Kedzie Road and Western Avenue in communities of Olympia Fields and Flossmoor and the Burnham Multimodal Connector in the Village of Burnham. A pedestrian and bicycle feasibility study was performed to help link the communicates of River Forest and Maywood across the Des Plaines River along two corridors that currently do not provide for non -motorized travel developing Road Diet alternatives. Project tasks include alternatives analyses, complete street analysis, traffic and safety studies, drainage studies, structural analyses, environmental evaluations, and public involvement. Cook County, 170th Street Phase I Study, Chicago, IL. QC Review. The scope of services includes the preparation of preliminary engineering and environmental (Phase 1) studies and design engineering (Phase 11) plans and specifications for bridge and roadway improvements in accordance with policies from the County and the Illinois Department of Transportation (I DOT). These policies include and are not limited to Connecting Cook County: 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, the IDOT Bureau of Local Roads and Streets Manual, the IDOT Bureau of Design and Environment Manual, the IDOT Bridge Manual, the IDOT Geotechnical Manual, the IDOT Drainage Manual, AASHTO _RFD Bridge Design Specifications, Cook County's design guide for Complete Streets Policy — Cook County, IL, 2011, and other policies adopted by the County or IDOT. The Consultant must IIsdiriiirix„acoiv-i I At HDR, we do 1Ynngs right to rnake great thrngs possible. 07 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Centlrall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiilrn,g Il II Ilii ngin neeining II Study I MMuw McNally ally (C )ntinued) also perform these services in a manner which fulfills all criteria related to federal funding standards, codes, and procedures. INoll llEXill IRill Ill. INC Illi, Illinois Department of Transportation Various Intersection Improvement Projects. Roadway and Drainage Engineer for 14 Phase I Intersection Improvement Projects through an Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) District 1 Various Various Contract. Project locations are as follows: • 183rd Street and Central Avenue (Cook County) — Roundabout vs. Signalized • IL Route 72 at Beverly Road (Cook County) - Signalized • IL Route 22 at Old Barrington Road (Lake County) - Signalized • IL Route 173 at Wilmot Road (McHenry County) — Roundabout vs. Signalized • US 12/IL Route 59 at Sullivan Lake Road (Lake County) — Signalized • US 12/1 L Route 59 at Fox Lake Road (Lake County) - Signalized • US Route 20 at Brier Hill/Allen Road (Kane County) — Signalized vs. Relocate • US Route 20 at Harmony Road (McHenry County) — Roundabout vs. Signalized • US Route 20 at Marengo/Union Road (McHenry County) -Roundabout • IL Route 176 at Haligus/Mt. Thabor Road (McHenry County) — Roundabout vs. Signalized • IL Route 43 at 143rd Street (Cook County) - Signalized • IL Route 43 at 151st Street (Cook County) - Signalized • Kedzie Avenue and 119th Street (Cook County) - Signalized • IL 56 (Butterfield Avenue) and Hart/Mitchell Road (Kane County) - Signalized Intersections typically fall under the top 5% most dangerous intersections in the state. Improvements range from channelization, realignment, and signalization of the intersection to the design of roundabouts. Responsibilities include storm water management and detention design, review of environmental impacts, geometric design, traffic analysis, traffic control staging during construction, the preparation of technical drainage memorandums, hydraulic studies, and intersection design studies. Coordinate and review the project with local agencies (Counties, Townships, and Villages) and in some cases the general public. Lake County Division of Transportation, Stearns School Road at US 41 Phase 1/11 Intersection Improvements, IL. Project Manager for Phase 1/11 Engineering and Environmental Studies for the Intersection improvements at Stearns School Road and U.S. Hwy 41. US Hwy 41 Is a divided four -lane road under IDOT jurisdiction. The traffic signals at the intersection of US Hwy 41 and Stearns School Road are Interconnected with the intersection of US Hwy 41 and IL Route 21. Stearns School Road is primarily a two-lane road under the jurisdiction of LCDOT. Tasks included completing a crash analysis for identifying existing safety concerns, a traffic analysis for identifying capacity issues, and an alternative analysis to determine potential improvements to address the safety concerns and capacity issues. The preferred alternative for this intersection included the addition of dual left turn lanes on the south leg of US Hwy 41; the addition of a right turn lane and left turn lane on the north leg of US Hwy 41; the addition of dual right turn lanes and a westbound through lane on the west leg Stearns School Road; traffic signal modifications at the intersection of Stearns School Road and US Hwy 41; and the addition of a left turn lane at the intersection of Stearns School Road and Fuller Road. Lake County Division of Transportation, Hunt Club Road at Washington Street Phase 1/11 Intersection Improvements, IL. Project Manager for Phase 1/11 Engineering and Environmental Studies in accordance with IDOT's Bureau of Local Roads & Streets Policies & Procedures for Federal -Aid Projects, for an intersection improvement at Washington Street and Hunt Club Road in Gurnee, IL. The intersection was evaluated for the following alternatives: • Widening to accommodate dual left turn lanes and right turn lanes on all legs of the intersection with pedestrian accommodations • Single Left Turn Lane Continuous Flow Intersection • Michigan Left Turn Lane Intersection Work included intersection design study; alternatives analysis, field survey; plats and legal descriptions for right-of-way and easement acquisitions; identification of detention requirements; flood plain determination; hydrology/hydraulic analysis; wetland delineation; soils investigation, aesthetics and analysis, public involvement, and an environmental assessment. Traffic Modeling included Highway Capacity Software, Synchro, and Vissum. Coordination with utility companies, permitting agencies, and local communities was required. Jim also served as Public Involvement lead meeting with local stakeholders including church board members, Village, and property owners. Jim led a public information meeting for the preferred alternative and prepared presentation materials and virtual content for project website and social media (https:// www.lakecountyil.gov/4078/Hunt-Club-at-Washington) including the preparation of a purpose and need video and the preferred alternative video. Illiru-u I At HDR, we do U)ings right to make great thrnn po ssih/e. 0 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Soulhe.rn Illinois (..)nivc r silty,'1984 REGISTRATIONS Profesrsismal [:.ngineer, Illinois, #06) 0/15)801 1959 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers, Illinois Section American Society for Quality INDUSTRYTENURE ]u3 r, years HDRTENURE 16 years I II Village of Yount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road Railroad CrossingCrossingIlalluase II Ili.in, iineein ing StStudyII I uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu Steve M i kott i s, PE Quality Reviewer Steven has nearly four decades of experience in the areas of planning, preliminary engineering, final design, specifications, and management of arterial and Interstate highway projects. He is responsible for the successful implementation of projects for HDR's clients from initial scoping, developing meaningful project criteria, managing of project budgets and schedules, project staffing, as well as technical oversight to multi -disciplined teams comprised of HDR and subconsultants. Expertise includes Phase I preliminary engineering and Phase 11 contract plan preparation for transportation agencies and encompasses tasks such as maintenance bridge inspections, technical report writing, highway geometric design, location studies, roadside safety design, drainage studies, intersection analyses, public involvement contract plan preparation, writing of design specifications, and preparation of construction cost estimates. The success of Steven's projects directly relates to maintaining professional relationships, continuous and effective communication among the team and clients, and embracing the HDR Quality and Best Practices Program to confirm client requirements are met. Additionally, Steven serves as an in-house QC Reviewer, and as the Area Quality & Records Coordinator, responsible for training, compliance, and maintenance of quality processes. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Illinois Department of Transportation, Central Avenue/BRC Railroad Grade Separation Phase Study, (CREATE GS2) Chicago, I L. Project Manager. HDR is preparing an Environmental Assessment and Combined Design Report for the grade separation of Central Avenue and the BRC Railroad which serves as the access for six Class I freight railroads to Clearing Yard on the south side of Chicago. As Project Engineer, Steven was responsible for the day- to-day coordination of technical disciplines and activities including development and refinement of geometric alternatives, environmental studies, drainage and pump station concepts, and coordination with agencies and the BRC railroad. In addition to being in a dense urban setting comprised of residential, commercial, and industrial uses, the location of the project at the northwest corner of Midway Airport directly under the flight path of Runway 13-31 further constrained possible grade separation solutions. A particular challenge was balancing the need to alleviate at -grade crossing delays with the substantial impacts of the large footprint required for a freight railroad grade separation, while also maintaining access between Central Avenue and Archer Avenue (I L 171). Steven was responsible for public involvement activities that included public meetings and stakeholder involvement using the principles of Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS). This included the associated development of exhibits, presentations, newsletter, and animated visualization used in Community Advisory Group meetings and public meetings. Chicago Department of Transportation, Pershing Rd (Wentworth Ave -Ashland Ave) Phase I, Chicago, IL. Project Manager. HDR conducted a Phase I study for the rehabilitation of two miles of 39th Street (Pershing Road) from Wentworth Avenue to Ashland Avenue in the densely urbanized Back of the Yards Neighborhood of Chicago. As Project Manager, Steven coordinated the efforts of the team to identify the elements of the corridor that are most important to the City and stakeholders and develop solutions that satisfy the purpose and need for the improvements. Unique challenges include the treatment of an existing viaduct over Racine Avenue and 2 rail spurs where there \A ere once cattle passes and a bustling stockyards rail terminal, the proximity to the Racine Avenue Pumping Station and its 24' diameter interceptor that runs under Pershing Road, coordination with parking operations at Guaranteed Rate Field (Chicago White Sox), the implementation of a "road diet" that converts the 5 -lane roadway cross section to 3 -lanes with raised bike lanes. The proposed improvements also needed to retain Ilndiriionc. c®unn I At HDR, we do [Y)ings right to rnoke great thrnn po ssihle. 09 I II Villlage of Mount Prospect ( Cen(Irall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiiln,g Phrase II Ili.in,ginneeining II Study I Steve Mikot°tis. 41.`oni:inued) the integrity of the existing trolley tracks that are embedded in the existing pavement but now serve to ground the ComEd electrical grid in this part of the city. The Project Development Report was approved by CDOT, IDOT, and FHWA in December 2020. Illinois Department of Transportation, PTB 199-015, Various Phase II Pavement and Bridge Preservation Projects, District One, IL. QAQC Reviewer. HDR is responsible for providing professional engineering design services for numerous federally funded pavement and bridge preservation projects on the interstate system and on arterials located in District One. The Phase II task assignments include SMART pavement resurfacing with ADA corner design, pavement crack and joint sealing, and bridge deck resurfacing with joint repair, often developed under abbreviated timeframes. Engineering services include development of Plans, Specifications and Estimates at each of the independent project locations. Steven was responsible for roadway and maintenance of traffic QC reviews. Illinois Department of Transportation, IL 19/Irving Park Road and York Road Intersection Phase II Design (CREATE GS 16), Bensenville, DuPage, IL. QAQC Reviewer. Phase 11 design of the reconstruction and widening of Irving Park Road at York Road intersection located immediately south'Aest of O'Hare International Airport. The $50M project includes a grade separation of the CP at Irving Park Road pavement reconstruction and widening improved intersection geometry additional auxiliary lanes drainage system improvements and signal modernization. The project was coordinated to be compatible with the O'Hare Modernization Program and the Elgin O'Hare Bypass. Steven was responsible for roadway and maintenance of traffic QC reviews. Illinois Department of Transportation -District 4, PTB 181 Item 2, US 150 Eastbound (McClugage Bridge) over the Illinois River Value Engineering Study, IL. VE Team Member — Highway Design/Highway Planning. HDR facilitated a cost risk assessment and value engineering (CRAVE) study for IDOT District 4 for the US 150 Eastbound (McClugage Bridge) over the Illinois River, Peoria and Tazewell Counties, Illinois. In total, the CRAVE Team generated 57 ideas for the project. These ideas were compared against the baseline concept developed by the project team. The ideas that performed the best were further developed by the CRAVE Team and resulted in 14 VE Recommendations being brought forward to either reduce risk, cost or schedule totaling $59.0 — $69.6 million in savings. Illinois Department of Transportation, 1-270 Bridges over Chain of Rocks Canal Phase I + II Engineering, Granite City, IL. Project Manager. HDR conducted a Phase I study for the replacement of the existing 50 -year-old twin truss bridges carrying 1-270 over the Chain of Rocks canal and the Chain of Rocks Levee outside of St. Louis. The canal handles all Mississippi River barge traffic passing through Lock & Dam #17, and the levee protects the Metro -East area from Mississippi River flooding. As Project Manager, Steven led the effort to develop and screen bridge replacement concepts that could meet the requirements of the site conditions and the myriad federal, state, and local agencies. The project was on an expedited schedule because in addition to their age and condition, the existing twin truss bridges were from the same era and designer as the failed 1-35bridge in Minneapolis. To gain consensus on the approach and to accelerate reviews and approvals, the study kicked off with a multi -agency charette. Significant challenges overcome during the Phase I Study 'Here finding a cost-effective means of achieving the nearly 500 -foot clear span over the canal without compromising the levee with substructure elements, maintaining the existing 1-270 / IL Rte. 3 interchange that is adjacent to the canal crossing, and keeping the Interstate, canal, and levee trails open to traffic during construction. In addition to IDOT, FHWA, and the typical regulatory agencies, stakeholders also included the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and levee districts for levee coordination, the US Coast Guard, USACE, and barge operator's trade associations for canal operations, Madison County Transit, and Metro -East Parks & Recreation District for levee trail coordination. Illinois Tollway, 1-294 Central Tri-State Mile Long Bridge Reconstruction and Widening, Cook County, IL. QAQC Reviewer. HDR is providing Master Plan and Phase II engineering services for engineering studies and the preparation of contract plans and specifications for proposed bridge rehabilitation and bridge reconstruction and widening of the Mile -Long Bridge on the central Tri-State Toll'Aay (1 -294) in Cook County. As the Quality Assurance Manager for the Joint Venture team, Steven is responsible for the development of the Consultant Quality Plan and overseeing the implementation of the plan by all Joint Venture Team members. Kane County, Randall Road at Weld Road Phase 11, Elgin, Kane, IL. QAQC Reviewer. The Randall Road at Weld Road/ US -20 project includes geometric and capacity improvements at the intersection of Randall Road and Weld Road/US-20 located in the City of Elgin. The proposed improvements include the construction of a new, dedicated NB -to -EB entrance ramp from Randall Road to US -20, removal of the Weld Road (East) connection to Randall Road and reconfiguration of existing traffic lanes on Randall Road to eliminate the NB left -turn movement at the Randall Road at Weld Road/US-20 intersection. The work includes the development of plans, specifications, and estimates. Plans will be prepared in accordance with Chapter 63 of the IDOT BDE Manual and Federal Aid guidelines. The Phase II Design will be funded locally, and Phase III Construction will be funded through CMAQ. Steven was responsible for roadway and maintenance of traffic QC reviews. Illiru-u I At HDR, we do Unngs right to rnake great thrnris possible. 10 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil and Environrnenl_al Engineering, l..Jniversily of Illinois l..Jrbana Cliarnpaign, 2011 REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer, Illinois, #062 0075x15, 2015 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS APWA Chicago INDUSTRYTENURE 13 Years:, HDRTENURE 12 Years 0 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Celntlrall Road IlUlllroaad CrossingIlalluase II Ili.inginneeining II Study I Ben Zeman, PE Project Engineer Ben is a respected leader who produces high-quality technical work and leads diverse teams on the delivery of challenging multi -disciplinary projects. His duties have encompassed leading large and diverse teams through the design of freeway and interchange projects in the development of concept plans, preliminary plans, and final contract documents. His project design experience focuses on the development of horizontal and vertical geometry, roadway sections, interchange layouts, maintenance of traffic, pavement marking and signage, and erosion control. He has experience developing comprehensive 3D design models of roadways and interchanges and analyzing earthwork volumes for staged construction of roadways and complex interchanges. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Cook County, Various Preliminary (Phase 1) Engineering Services, Cook County, IL. Project Engineer. HDR was selected by Cook County to perform various preliminary engineering services and studies. HDR is providing various services including standalone Phase I studies, feasibility studies, engineering oversight/ review, and GIS. As the Project Engineer, Ben is responsible for overseeing the engineering and conceptual design and coordination with the multi -disciplinary team. Specific projects include the following: • Burnham Multimodal Corridor (BMC) Phase I — A grade separated multi -use path and bridge project spanning several railroad tracks providing a critical connection for the Burnham Greenway Trail. Project scope includes structural, public involvement, drainage, roadway, and shared use path analysis and design in addition to railroad and coordination with the ICC and IDNR. • Vollmer Road Viaduct Phase I — A study of the current substandard clearance of the railroad viaduct over Vollmer Road located in Olympia Fields and Flossmoor. The viaduct is the site of multiple crashes with trucks due to the low clearance. Project scope includes environmental, public involvement, structural, drainage, roadway, and roadway analyses in addition to railroad coordination. • Chicago Avenue/ Washington Boulevard Complete Streets Feasibility Study — Performed a feasibility study evaluating the two corridors linking the communities of Maywood and River Forest across the Des Plaines River. Concepts that were developed included road diets to identify potential improvements for non -motorized users. The study included crash evaluation and intersection capacity analyses. Portwine Road Feasibility Study — Performed a feasibility study to determine if/how motorized and nonmotorized traffic would react if Portwine Road were removed or access was otherwise reduced. The project included traffic projections, intersection capacity analyses, signal warrant analyses, cost estimates, stakeholder coordination, and public involvement. • Wolf Road Corridor Phase I — A study of the existing roadway corridor to determine future capacity needs, evaluate multimodal improvements, and determine the optimal use of space within the existing right of nay. Project scope includes roadway, multimodal improvements, drainage, public involvement, railroad coordination, and intersection analysis and design. • Other services provided: • GIS Asset Management • Right -of -Way • Environmental Kane County, Randall Road at Weld Road Phase 1/11 Engineering Services, IL. Roadway Engineer. At this major intersection along a highly congested corridor, the HDR Team conducted traffic operational analyses and provided intersection design options with the Illir n I At HDR, we Go fhingg; right to make oreot things possible. 11 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceinfirall Road Railroad Cirossiiin,g Ilalluase II Ili.ingineeining II Study I Tien Zeman i'I+'L anVnuii!!d) goal of relieving congestion. A Project Development Report was developed for the preferred design alternative, which addresses project Impacts such as wetlands, trees, noise and air quality. Upon acceptance of the PDR, Phase II design Was performed to develop construction documents. Mr. Zeman was responsible for developing conceptual geometry for various design alternatives and staging and estimate of cost for the preferred alternative. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), Safety Planning Technical Assistance, Calumet City and Riverdale, IL. Project Manager. CMAP selected HDRto provide technical assistance to the City of Calumet City and Village of Riverdale to identify and propose measures to improve safety at the Intersection of S Halsted Street and W 138th Street, the intersection of Burnham Avenue and River Oaks Drive, the intersection of Sibley Boulevard and Madison Avenue, and Pulaski Road from the Burnham Greenway Trail to State Line Road. HDR utilized crash data and engaged project stakeholders to identify safety concerns, then identified mitigation strategies and safety improvements to address each safety concern. A Benefit Cost Ratio Nas developed for each improvement by creating planning -level cost estimates and estimated reduction of crashes. The safety improvements were summarized in a report along with a description of actions that the municipality may take to secure funding and advance implementation for these improvements. As project manager, Mr. Zeman was responsible for leading the project team in identifying safety concerns and associated mitigation strategies, facilitating public engagement, coordination with project partners, identifying and describing potential funding streams for implementation of recommendations, and managing the schedule and budget of the project. The project report was recently completed and will be utilized by the municipalities to identify and implement safety improvements in their communities. Illinois Department of Transportation, IL 19/Irving Park Road and York Road Intersection Phase II Design (CREATE GS 16), Bensenville, IL. Design Engineer. HDR performed Phase II Design for the reconstruction and widening of the Irving Park Road at York Road intersection. The project included the grade separation of the Canadian Pacific Railroad over Irving Park Road, intersection geometry improvements including additional auxiliary lanes, pavement widening and reconstruction, drainage system improvements, and signal modernization. The project was coordinated to be compatible with the O'Hare Modernization Program and the Elgin O'Hare Western Bypass. Mr. Zeman was responsible for Phase II plan preparation and quantity take -offs. Illinois Department of Transportation, IL 53/56 Intersection Reconstruction Phase I (PTB 155, Item 16), Downers Grove, IL. Geometries Engineer. HDR was selected to study the IL 53/ IL 56 intersection to determine improvements that will resolve existing deficiencies, enhance system linkage and continuity and alleviate traffic congestion. The recommendations resulting from the study suggested that the roadways be widened and turn lanes be added to meet future vehicular traffic demands. The team also recommended that a separate shared -use path be provided as a vital connection to the Hidden Lakes Forest Preserve and Morton Arboretum for pedestrians and cyclists. Mr. Zeman was responsible for the development of and further revisions to conceptual geometry. He created plans and cross sections for alternative design concepts and calculated quantities to prepare an estimate of cost for the proposed improvements. A preferred alternative was selected and Phase I engineering was completed in 2014. DuPage County Division of Transportation, Fabyan Parkway at IL Route 38 Intersection Improvements Phase II Design, West Chicago, IL. Project Engineer. This HDR -led intersection improvement project included the resurfacing and widening of IL Route 38 and the reconstruction of Fabyan Parkway from a 2 -lane road to a 4 -lane road. The improved intersection of these two strategic regional arterials has additional turn lanes on all four legs to vastly alleviate traffic congestion. The project was the first phase of proposed corridor -wide improvements to Fabyan Parkway. As project engineer, Mr. Zeman was responsible for the development of contract plans, specifications and estimate. He was also responsible for coordinating the design with teaming partners, sub -consultants and project stakeholders such as municipalities and utility companies. Lake County Division of Transportation, Fairfield Road Intersection Improvements Phase II Design, Round Lake, IL. Road'A,ay Engineer. Lake County DOT selected HDR to perform Phase II Design for the Fairfield Road at Metra Railroad / IL - 134 intersection improvements In Round Lake, IL. The project included extensive roadway reconstruction, as well as resurfacing and widening and various geometric improvements such as additional auxiliary lanes. As an engineer on the project team, Mr. Zeman created and refined the maintenance of traffic and detour plans. He was also responsible for development of the roadway, cross sections, pavement marking, erosion control and traffic signal plans, and for formulating an estimate of cost for the proposed improvements. Will County Illinois, 80th Avenue Corridor Improvements Phase I Study, Tinley Park, IL. Roadway Engineer. HDR provided Phase I engineering services to improve and widen the 80th Avenue corridor between 183rd and 191st Streets, which included the intersections at 183rd Street, 185th Street, 186th Street, 189th Street, and 191st Street. HDR completed traffic and crash data analysis, drainage and hydraulic studies, intersection design studies, preliminary design and public involvement that was summarized in an Environmental Class of Action Document (ECAD) which resulted In a Categorical Exclusion determination. Mr. Zeman was responsible for the operational analysis, traffic signal warrant analysis and safety analysis of the roadway. Mr. Zeman was also responsible for initial development of the conceptual geometry, Including setting horizontal and vertical alignments and laying out the roadway to meet capacity requirements. IIsdiriionc„acounn I At HDR, we do U)ings right to make great thrng possible. 12 I II Vi llllage of Mount Prospect I Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad 0I0IPhase II 11i.ingilneein i ng StStudyII I Additional IPiroject Staff Julie Hoberg r1RAINS111POIRTATI110IN ILII,,,, INII(` IIII G As a Transportation Planner, Julie brings 23 years of experience working on many projects in the Chicago region that were processed through IDOT Local Roads. This include the City of Wheaton Manchester Road project over the UPRR, Pershing Road Phase I study that included railroad coordination, and several other Phase I studies for Lake, McHenry, Kane, and DuPage counties that included pedestrian and bicycle alternative analyses. I Michal Miczek, PE Jason Man, PE S IIU` III..` Y Michal has over 8 years of experience Y„ with a focus on safety studies that u uuuuuuuuuuuuu i�iNfi�liiif�uuui ii Ii��iluuui(�Ifu�iiiuul include intersections, corridors and communities. He has developed safety uu�i�ijuu�uuui�uuuuuuuuuuuuuiuuuuuuuuu�uuuuu�ui�uuuuuuuuuuu�iluu�uu�i�iiii�i studies for the Village of Riverdale and Calumet City on behalf of CMAP. PEL Study. Both of these projects have an Eric Neubauer, PE crossing immediately adjacent to an IDOL ROADWAY understanding of the IDOL signal timing With over 23 years of experience, Eric t has managed and designed numerous federally funded transportation uuuiuuuuuuuuuuuuui ui ��uiu�uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu� projects with a focus on geometric p 1 design that addresses both vehicles and non -motorized users. Most recently, Eric was the project manager for the Randall Road/Hopps Road Grade Separation Phase I for Kane County which is currently moving into Phase II after receiving an INFRA grant. Emily Grimm, PE, CFM 1113111RAIIIIINAGIE AIS III,,,"SIS IPERM11ITTIIIING Emily brings 9 years of combined public and private experience to her drainage designs. She understands the needs of the public agency especially in Cook County having worked at the Village of Winnetka as the Stormwater Manager/ Assistant Village Engineer. She is currently leading the drainage designs for all HDR's led Phase I studies that includes complex designs such as the Cary Maplewood Phase I Study that is on a new alignment needing to incorporate drainage for a parking lot as well as two existing subdivision detention basins. (UPRR) Track Maintenance and Construction Manager in Illinois, he can leverage his understanding of how the UPRR operates and coordinates design reviews, and he can help identify and facilitate needed engagements to keep the project moving forward. Jeremy Miller II1PII COOIRIII)IIIIINATI110IN Jason Man, PE His 20 years of experience includes project design reviews and Y„ preconstruction planning regarding u uuuuuuuuuuuuu i�iNfi�liiif�uuui ii Ii��iluuui(�Ifu�iiiuul railroad and projects that roadway Y converge. As the past Union Pacific (UPRR) Track Maintenance and Construction Manager in Illinois, he can leverage his understanding of how the UPRR operates and coordinates design reviews, and he can help identify and facilitate needed engagements to keep the project moving forward. approach the Central Road Phase I Study. Scott Manning a � 111PUB11 IIC bUTII III; III I/ STIl 'TIIIi GIC COMMUIRICATI110INS Scott is HDR's area Strategic uuu�iiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui Communications Lead. A former state strategic communications director, he has been using his experience to create effective engagement with various stakeholders. He has most recently coordinated efforts for the Village of Cary, Lake County, Will County, IDOT Long Range Transportation Plan, and IDOT Phase I Studies lead by HDR. These engagements include online/ virtual tools as well as traditional in-person settings. Nate Macek, AICP ��.., III'mUIIIIIII Nate is HDR's Infrastructure Finance A�" ( Director with over 20 years of experience helping HDR's clients secure federal Iuuuuiiiiiuuuuui1111uiiifiuiififo funding for their projects. He assists agencies in evaluating funding options to develop strategies to secure grants. His most recent efforts lead to a grant for CMAP for over $3M to conduct Safe Streets for All Studies for the counties in the Chicago region. IlIini I At HDR, we cio Things right to make great thrngs possible. 13 Jason Man, PE TRAFFIC Y„ Jason brings 6 years of experience having �r performed the traffic analysis most recently for the Lake County Fairfield uu�i�ijuu�uuui�uuuuuuuuuuuuuiuuuuuuuuu�uuuuu�ui�uuuuuuuuuuu�iluu�uu�i�iiii�i Road Phase I Study and the IDOT I L 120 PEL Study. Both of these projects have an at -grade railroad crossing immediately adjacent to an IDOL intersection. His understanding of the IDOL signal timing requirements allows him to have an initial grasp of how to approach the Central Road Phase I Study. Scott Manning a � 111PUB11 IIC bUTII III; III I/ STIl 'TIIIi GIC COMMUIRICATI110INS Scott is HDR's area Strategic uuu�iiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui Communications Lead. A former state strategic communications director, he has been using his experience to create effective engagement with various stakeholders. He has most recently coordinated efforts for the Village of Cary, Lake County, Will County, IDOT Long Range Transportation Plan, and IDOT Phase I Studies lead by HDR. These engagements include online/ virtual tools as well as traditional in-person settings. Nate Macek, AICP ��.., III'mUIIIIIII Nate is HDR's Infrastructure Finance A�" ( Director with over 20 years of experience helping HDR's clients secure federal Iuuuuiiiiiuuuuui1111uiiifiuiififo funding for their projects. He assists agencies in evaluating funding options to develop strategies to secure grants. His most recent efforts lead to a grant for CMAP for over $3M to conduct Safe Streets for All Studies for the counties in the Chicago region. IlIini I At HDR, we cio Things right to make great thrngs possible. 13 I II Village of Mount Prospect I Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad CIrossiilnlg Phase II 11i.inginneeining. Study II I 1I '" Janice Reid, PTP 111FINVIIIIIROINMENTAIII J Janice leads the areas environmental work for all of HDR's Illinois projects. o f With 30 ears of experience, she Y brings a wealth of experience especially in coordinating with IDOT and Environmental Justices issues.. This is extremely invaluable due to the ever-changing environmental regulations passed down from the federal government and how IDOT requires local agencies to apply these regulations to their projects. Having previously worked at Metra, she also has a keen understanding of railroad projects with respect to the environment. Jon Kjellman, PE UTIIIll ,,,,I1TIlllfl° IH III)II INATOIR With over 15 years of experience, Jon is a Project Engineer on several local agency projects who brings his unique experience of working on not only Phase I projects, but Phase II as well as Phase III. This perspective is very useful when dealing with utilities during Phase I as he understands the importance how issues, if not addressed, can perpetuate into later phases. Helen Lin, EDAC, RLA, LEED AP r � Ill AIN III C ING/A111:..`S-TIHIE-TI1CS -TI1 �t '% ' Helen, a landscape architect, has i% o� lia.� f worked on myriad of projects including �u recreation park planning/design, school campus planning/design, and streetscape design/development. She also has extensive experience working with IDOT on state roadway project for their landscape designs. In this role assisting IDOT, she has a full understanding of what is needed for IDOT State jurisdiction projects helping identify optimal design based on IDOT's landscaping criteria. Jonathan Past SURVEY Jon, with Gewalt Hamilton, Inc. (GHA), brings over 25 years of experience in transportation surveying. HDR and GHA have collaborated over the years including most recently the Village of Cary's Maplewood Extension Phase I Study. For this project, Jon used drone survey as well as ground survey to maximize their efforts. He also coordinated with the Metra regarding surveying on their property. hdiriiiruc„acouvnu I At HDR, we do things right to make great thfngs go ssihle. m I II Village of Mount IE'rospect ( Celn hall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiiing Phase II IEl.ingilneeining Study II I iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillI 3. RELATED EXPERIENCE Based on the Village's Request for Proposal (RFP), HDR has compiled its related experience in the following catergories and is demonstrated in detail on the following pages. A. Phase I Engineering services for at -grade railroad crossing and roadway improvements on State roads B. Experience working with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) on roadway, intersection, traffic signal, and pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure projects. C. Experience working with the Union Pacific Railroad and Illinois Commerce Commission on at -grade railroad crossing improvement projects. D. Experience working with multiple interest groups including municipalities, state agencies, residents and businesses. Emphasis will be placed on effective communication tools and the ability to build consensus. E. Identifying state/federal grant opportunities with a history of successfully securing Phase II and Phase III Engineering funds. IL 120 PEL Study - IL 60 to Almond Road "II' II II..IL.II IN O II S Ilk Ili[ IIS A IR T M IG: INT 0 IF IR A IN S P 01R TAT II 0 IN Fairfield Road Throughway Intersection Improvements, Phase I+II (�6 G0 LAKE COUNTY DUV IISUON OF TRANSPORTATUON Central Avenue/BRC Railroad Grade Separation Phase I Study ( (° IIII. II II INOIIS IIII: PAIRTMII::INT 0 "II'IRAINSIP0RTATII0IN Pershing Road Phase I Study CNUCAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATUON MAPLEWOOD ACCESS ROAD EXTENSION - PHASE I VIIII..LAGII:: OF CAIRY Grade Separation Feasibility Study VULUAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Lakewood Road Corridor Phase I+II Engineering U, MCHII::NIRY COUNTY IDIIVPIISIIOIN 0IU"tt'IRAINSIPOII�"II'A'1'IIOIN Randall Road at Weld Road Phase I+II Engineering Services WANE COUNTY DUVUSUON OF TRANSPORTATUON Cook County Various Phase I Studies COOK COUNTY II)IEIPA IR'TMIli!INT GIFTIRAINSP0IR'TATIIOIN AND IIUIIGIIU AYS Calumet City and Riverdale Safety Planning Technical Assistance (^ CNUCAGO METROPOLIITAN AGENCY FOR PUANNUNG Street/Manchester idge ReplacementWesley over the U ion PacificRailroad CIITY OF UN'I4II::ATOIN ONTO 2050 Regionally Significant Projects & Program Support Services CNUCAGO METROPOLIITAN AGENCY FOR PUANNUNG Ihidirii -w. couv-u I At HDR, we clo tfrings right to make great thfngs po ssih/c. 15 I II Vi llllage Of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad CIrossiii ng Phase ase II 11i.inginneein i ng StStudyII I ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IL 120 PEL STUDY- IL 60 TO ALMOND ROAD LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS Rd ILMOSTUDY II I,r _LJ Jl.t rd HDR was selected by the Illinois Department of Transportation to conduct a Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study for Illinois Route 120 in Lake County. The project limits extend for over 9 miles in central Lake County from Illinois Route 60 east to Almond Road. A PEL Study encourages collaboration to evaluate environmental, communities' input, and project goals to develop alternatives prior to the N EPA (Phase 1) process. HDR will prepare geometric concepts, traffic and safety studies, environmental studies for the improvement of Illinois Route 120 in central Lake County. Services include environmental studies, and public involvement for the project. The PEL Study will also evaluate two highway - railroad grade crossings considering at -grade and/or grade separation alternatives. The public involvement will include a hybrid of in person and W virtual engagement tools working with stakeholders and the public. Jeff as the Project Manager is responsible for the day -to day activities for the project so that deliverables, timelines, and budget goals were achieved. A27 A24 LEGEND www Project Study Limits PROJECT STUDY LIMITS IL 120 FROM IL ROUTE 66 TOALMOND ROAD hdiriiiruc„acoini I At HDR, we cio trtjngs right to make great thrngs possible. 16 I II Vi llllage of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiii ng Phase ase II 11i.inginneein i ng StStudyII I LAKE COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION FAIRFIELD ROAD THROUGHWAY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I+II LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS The Fairfield Road and the Metra/ IL 134 Intersection Improvements Study included Phase I engineering services for the improvement of the intersection of Fairfield Road and the Metra/IL 134 located in the Villages of Round Lake and Round Lake Beach. During the Phase I study, a Project Development Report was prepared that provided a recommended design of the following study alternatives: a railroad grade separation with or without a grade separated interchange of the existing intersection, and an intersection improvement that retains the existing at -grade railroad crossing. This study complied with Federal Aid guidelines, as federal funding was anticipated. HDR's approach to this project integrated the project goals and NEPA guidelines to provide a comprehensive solution. The scope of work included data collection, operational analysis, drainage analysis, alternatives analysis and extensive public involvement including multiple design workshops. Extensive traffic analyses were completed to evaluate roadway levels of service and other measures of effectiveness. The environmental analysis identified potential impacts to local resources and these findings were integrated into the preferred alternative identities. HDR was also selected to provide Phase II services, which included the preparation of plans, specifications, and cost estimates. The improvements included roadway reconstruction and widening while staged under congested traffic. An at -grade rail crossing was located north of the intersection within the improvement limits which required coordinated with Metra and the Illinois Commerce Commission. The presence of residential and commercial properties within the project limits required the development of a plan to manage access to the properties during construction. In addition The presence of low income housing which required careful consideration of environmental justice concerns. A shared use path was proposed as part of the complete streets Initiative to accommodate pedestrian and bicyclists. The existing drainage system was upgraded to address the additional capacity requirements. HDR resolved an existing drainage issue by diverting storm water that caused flooding of a residential neighborhood without acquiring additional right-of-way. HDR coordinated with nearly thirty utility owners to identify and resolve utility conflicts starting at the development of preliminary plans. The existing traffic signals were modernized with the addition of a PTZ camera and wireless capabilities. hdiriiiruc„acoini I At HDR, we cio things right to make great thrngs gossihle. 17 I II Vi llllage of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiii ng Phase ase II 11i.ingiii neein i ng StStudyII I ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL AVENUE/BRC RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PHASE I STUDY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS HDR was selected by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) to conduct a Phase I Study for the grade separation of Central Avenue and the BRC Railroad in Chicago, where an estimated 20 freight train crossings per day delay approximately 23,000 drivers. The study is being conducted using the principles of Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) for stakeholder involvement, and includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and Combined Design Report. The project study area is located at the northwest corner of Midway Airport directly under the flight path of Runway 13-31, and will also incorporate the intersections of Central Avenue with 55th Street and Central Avenue with Archer Avenue. Central Avenue serves as a key north - south route on the southwest side of Chicago, and will become an even more critical link to the Stevenson Expressway (1-55) once a planned connection across the CSX Railroad intermodal rail yard to the south of Midway Airport is completed. The goal of the engineering and environmental studies is to identify and gain approvals for a preferred alternative to separate the railroad and roadway traffic while minimizing adverse impacts to the vital rail operations, adjacent property owners, access for area residents and businesses, airport operations, and the environment. In addition to working closely with the BRC Railroad, the stakeholder involvement program has engaged a whole host of City of Chicago agencies, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, the FAA, area political representatives, homeowner and business associations, and residents of the local predominantly Polish and Hispanic communities. hdiriiiruc„acoini I At HDR, we cio things right to make great thrngs possible. is I II Vi llllage of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad CIrossiii ng Phase II 11i.inginneein i ng StStudyII I CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PERSHING ROAD PHASE I STUDY ILLINOIS HDR provided Phase I Preliminary Engineering services on 39th Street (Pershing Road) from Wentworth Avenue to Ashland Avenue. The project study area is approximately two miles long with sixteen intersections, of which eight are signalized. HDR conducted studies regarding the improvements needed to rehabilitate the existing bridge and roadway within the project limits and the associated environmental impacts. The study included coordination with Norfolk Southern Railroad, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, Chicago Department of Water Management, Illinois Commerce Commission, Chicago Transit Authority, and Chicago Area Joint Electrolysis Committee. The project includes preliminary engineering, environmental studies, development of proposed roadway geometry, rail crossing alternatives, intersection design studies, bridge condition report, location drainage study, maintenance of traffic concept, The preferred alternative includes new bridge Type, Size & Location study, and public involvement activities. HDR completed a Project Development Report and obtained approvals from Chicago DOT, Illinois DOT, and the Federal Highway Administration. HDR prepared a project brochure and mailings to area residents and pavement, curbs, gutters, sewers, and sidewalks, on -street protected bike lanes, off-street bike lanes, updated ADA ramps at street crossings, median pedestrian refuge, energy efficient LED street lighting, traffic signal modernizations, streetscape features, sewer and drainage work, businesses in advance of conducting a and reconstruction of bridge over virtual public meeting. Unique features taken into account in this urban traffic environment included a mix of pedestrians, bicyclists, and trucks, access to and from 190/94, Chicago Transit Authority bus stops, multiple existing major sewer interceptors up to 22 feet in diameter passing under the bridge and retaining walls, existing trolley lines embedded in the Pershing Road pavement to be maintained for power grid grounding, truck movements associated with the Stockyards Industrial Park, and the at -grade crossings of main Norfolk Southern rail line running parallel to Pershing Road. Norfolk Southern railroad spurs and adjacent retaining walls. hdiriiiruc„acoini I At HDR, we cio things right to make greet thrngs gossihle. 19 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiilnlg Phase II IEl.inginneeining. Study II I VILLAGE OF CARY MAPLEWOOD ACCESS ROAD EXTENSION - PHASE I CARY, ILLINOIS The Village of Cary selected HDR to provide Phase I engineering design services for the extension of a new access road to support the redevelopment of the former Maplewood School site between the North Metra Commuter Parking Lot and the Cary -Algonquin Road at Industrial Drive intersection. The new roadway, adjacent to the UPRR tracks,would be designed in accordance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Strategic Plan goals capitalizing on public transit assets, reducing inefficiencies and areas of congestion, providing missing linkages in the roadway network and expanding bike and pedestrian facilities. The services provided include traffic and safety analysis, complete street design, intersection design studies, drainage and geometric analyses, environmental services including 4(f), public involvement with a project website, and a project develop report submitting to IDOT and FHWA. hdiriiiruc„acouvnu I At HF)R, we dt o rringsht tt th rigo make greaing go ssihle. 7 20 I II Vi llllage of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad CIrossiii ng Phase ase II IEl.ingi nrneein i ng StStudyII I VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT GRADE SEPARATION FEASIBILITY STUDY MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS A Downtown area of Mount Prospect is the focus of significant transformation with the 10 N. Main, 20 West, and Park Terrace multi- family residential developments, each meeting the goals of the Downtown Implementation Plan. The street network that serves the new and existing land uses in the Downtown area has often been the subject of improvement. Specifically, a short term object of the Strategic Plan is to make Mount Prospect a more walkable, pedestrian -friendly community, while also improving the conveyance of vehicles by evaluating the downtown street network to reduce congestion, queuing, and the loss of time associated with signal interruptions and limited crossing options from freight and commuter activity along the Union Pacific Railroad. As such, the Village of Mount Prospect hired IT DR to perform a feasibility study to identify and assess alternatives for improving conveyance of vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians across the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. The purpose of this proposed project is to improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, commuters, and motorists moving through the Village's downtown area. In addition, the Village seeks to reduce traffic congestion, reduce long queue lengths, and taper the loss of time associated with traffic signal cycling interruptions and the limited options to cross the railroad tracks in the current street network configuration. The scope of work includes collecting traffic and safety data needed to analyze existing highway rail at -grade crossings; identifying key stakeholders and conduct two focused workshops; identifying at -grade alternatives for reducing grade crossing area traffic conflicts; evaluating the feasibility of grade -separation, addressing the potential impacts of reasonable conflict reduction measures; identifying potential funding sources for recommended conflict reduction measures; and preparing and presenting a report of findings and recommendations for a course of action. hdiriiiruc„acoini I At HDR, we cio things right to make greet thrngs possible. 21 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiilnlg Phase II IEl.inginneeining. Study II I McHENRY COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION LAKEWOOD ROAD CORRIDOR PHASE I+II ENGINEERING LAKE IN THE HILLS, ILLINOIS HDR was selected by McHenry County to develop Phase I & II engineering plans for the Lakewood Road Corridor Improvement project in Lake in the Hills, Illinois. HDR successfully completed the planning, design and construction phases of the initial project with traffic signals at Miller and Reed Roads in 2020 by improving safety, traffic operations, efficiency, and mobility for the corridor. HDR is now helping the County to examine alternatives for a shared use path and innovative intersection solutions, including roundabouts. HDR has performed data collection, operational/crash analysis, alternatives analysis, environmental studies (biological, cultural, wetland, floodplains), drainage and hydraulic studies, conceptual staging plans, structure Type, Size and Location studies, and utility coordination. The corridor is adjacent to Exner Marsh Conservation Area and crosses a tributary to Kishwaukee Creek. HDR has performed wetland delineations, jurisdictional determination requests, floodplain analysis, and measures to avoid impacts to the Exner Marsh and the Blanding's Turtle, an Illinois endangered species. Agency coordination has occurred with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, the Village of Lake in the Hills and the McHenry County Conservation District. HDR has also performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. hdiriiiruc„acouvnu I At HF)R, we dt o rringsht tt th rigo make greaing go ssible. 7 22 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilliroad Cirossiiinlg Phase II 11i.inginneeining II Study I KANE COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION RANDALL ROAD AT WELD ROAD PHASE I+II ENGINEERING SERVICES FLGIN,ILLINOIS The Randall Road at Weld Road/US 20 Intersection Improvement Phase I study evaluated alternatives and identified a preferred improvement that improved the safety and operations of the subject intersection. Currently a level of service F, the intersection experienced heavy congestion during peak hours causing left turn backups onto the mainline. The storage deficiencies and close proximity to an existing bridge over US Route 20 have presented safety issues and placed this intersection on the Daily Herald 2007 top 10 list for crashes. Randall Road is a suburban strategic regional arterial that utilized signal coordination through this intersection. The additional green time provided to Randall Road caused delay for vehicles exiting Route 20 and backups beyond the provided storage. The Randall Road at U.S. 20/Weld Road Intersection included the development of Phase I engineering and preparation of preliminary design for improvements at this intersection in the City of Elgin. The HDR Team conducted traffic operational analyses and provided intersection design options. Environmental Analyses were coordinated with the IDOT Bureau of Local Roads and Streets. The impacts included wetlands, trees, noise and air quality. A Project Development Report was prepared. IDOT coordination included environmental field reviews, meetings with the Bureau of Local Roads, and FHWA Coordination meetings. Design options included closure of on approach to the intersection and changing left turn movements to right turn movements. HDR completed Phase II of the project. The final design included a retaining wall along US Route 20, new single slope barrier wall, a new traffic signal, roadway widening, and resurfacing along Randall Road, a cul-de-sac of an existing roadway, and the addition of a new ramp. From the onset, the goal was to move construction from 2020 to 2019. The HDR team made some modifications to the design which removed the need for right-of-way and lead us to successfully advance the bid documents up, moving the construction start up by an entire construction season. hdiriiiruc„acouvnu I At HF)R, we dt o rringsht tt th rigo make greaing go ssible. 7 23 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiilnlg Phase II IEl.inginneeining. Study II I COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS COOK COUNTY VARIOUS PHASE I STUDIES VOLLER ROAD GRADE SEPARATION; CHICAGO AVENUE/ WASHINGTON BOULEVARD COMPLETE STREETS STUDY; BURNHAM MULTIMODAL CONNECTOR; VARIOUS GRANT ASSISTANCE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS HDR was selected by CCDOTH to conduct Phase I engineering for various projects. The Vollmer Road viaduct between Kedzie Road and Western Avenue in the communities of Olympia Fields and Flossmoor where Vollmer Road goes under a bridge providing rail service for freight and Metra trains. A federally processed Phase I study will evaluate the railroad viaduct that currently has a low clearance. Traffic, environmental, drainage, and geometrics studies will be performed to consider options to lower the existing road maintaining the existing railroad bridge, widen Vollmer Road with a new bridge, and construct a new bridge for Vollmer Road to go over the railroad tracks. Plaines River along these two corridors that currently do not provide for non -motorized travel. The Burnham Multimodal Connector (BMC) in the Village of Burnham is a project to address regional and local pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. The community is bisected by seven (7) railroad tracks requiring extensive coordination with multiple railroads, the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) and IDOT. The preferred alternative consisted of a new structure over the tracks as well as at -grade rail crossing improvements. Additionally, we identified grant opportunities and completed applications for the following projects: The Chicago Avenue and Washington . Safe Routes to School - Francisco Boulevard Complete Street / Road Avenue, Blue Island Diet feasibility study. The purpose is to help link the communicates of River • Illinois Special Bridge Program Forest and Maywood across the Des - Rohrssen Road Bridge, Hanover Township hdiriiiruc„acouvnu I At HF)R, we do things right to make great thfngs possible, W, I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilliroad Cirossiiinlg Phase II IE::inginneeining II Study I CHICAGO METROPOLITAN AGENCY FOR PLANNING CALUMET CITY AND RIVERDALE SAFETY PLANNING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CALUMET CITY AND RIVERDALE, ILLINOIS HDR provided technical assistance to the City of Calumet City and the Village of Riverdale to identify and propose measures to improve safety on Pulaski Road (154th Street) from Burnham Greenway to State Line Road, the intersection of Burnham Avenue and River Oaks Drive, the intersection of Sibley Boulevard (IL Route 83) and Madison Avenue, and the intersection of 138th Street and Halsted Street through a consultant contract with the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). These locations were selected by Calumet City and Riverdale because they experience a higher rate of severe (Type A) and fatal crashes than other similar locations in the municipalities. HDR evaluated the crashes that caused severe injuries and developed mitigation strategies and safety improvements to help reduce the number or severity of those crashes. Crash analysis and safety mitigations for each location were coordinated with CMAP and the local partner agencies. HDR also developed and implemented a public engagement plan for each community to solicit feedback from residents and key stakeholders. As part of the public engagement, HDR developed paper- and web -based surveys to identify perceived safety concerns and understand what types of safety improvements are desired by each community. HDR developed planning level estimates of cost and quantified benefit based on expected crash reduction for each improvement, which were used to develop Benefit - to -Cost Ratios (BCR's) to identify cost effective safety improvements. HDR also identified potential funding sources and strategies for Calumet City and Riverdale to implement the safety improvements identified through the study. hdiriiiruc„acouvnu I At HF)R, we do trrings right to make great thing go ssible. 7 25 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Rod IRaiilllroad Clrossiilnlg Phase II IEl.inginneeining. Study II I CITY OF WHEATON WESLEY STREET/MANCHESTER ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OVER THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD WHEATON, ILLINOIS Following the completion of a Feasibility Study, HDR provided Phase I preliminary engineering, Phase II final design and Phase III construction oversight services for the replacement of the Wesley Street/Manchester Road Bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad. The existing bridge, which was included on the Illinois Historic Bridge Survey, was determined to be functionally obsolete and structurally deficient. The project included removal and replacement of the historic truss bridge; extensive retaining wall design; rehabilitation, partial reconstruction, and expansion of the adjacent Illinois Prairie Path Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge (with the construction of four new spans and new substructure); and the realignment and profile adjustments of six impacted roadways to meet current railroad and roadway bridge clearance requirements. HDR developed PS&E for reconstruction of the six adjacent roadways in addition to the roadway bridge and Illinois Prairie Path Bridge. This project involved extensive stakeholder coordination with IDOT, the City of Wheaton, DuPage County, the Union Pacific Railroad, Illinois Prairie Path Volunteers Group, utility companies, local businesses, and residents throughout construction. The HDR team performed the contracted services meeting Federal, IDOT and City requirements for projects with local and Federal funding verified by successful independent project audits by IDOT. hdiriiiruc„acouvnu I At HDR, we dt o rringsht tt th rigo make greaing go ssihle. 7 26 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRaiilllroad Clrossiilnlg Phase II IEl.ingiiineeining. Study II I CHICAGO METROPOLITAN AGENCY FOR PLANNING WESLEY STREET/MANCHESTER ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OVER THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD WHFATON, ILLINOIS HDR supported CMAP's pursuit of federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) grant opportunities. This effort aims to maximize the impact of funding from grants awarded to projects within the region. As the region's metropolitan planning organization (MPO), CMAP seeks to implement new policies impacting current programs, prepare for new regional funding eligibility, coordinate area funding access, and build consensus between regional stakeholders. HDR is supporting CMAP by defining, collecting, and evaluating data to help screen and prioritize projects in the region to pursue federal grants to advance large-scale regionally significant infrastructure projects. In addition, HDR provided staff augmentation support for a USDOT Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant application for coordinated, multicounty "Safe Travel for All Roadmap" safety action planning. CMAP was awarded a $3.9 million planning grant by FHWA in February 2023. HDR's efforts are helping the Chicago metropolitan area to better prioritize and coordinate federal grant pursuits across the region. HDR was recently selected to deliver a Safety Action Plan for Lake County that will meet federal guidelines for future SS4A implementation grants, promotes safety, establishes equitable investments in historically excluded communities, and aligns priorities with evidence -based projects and strategies. With the HDR team's focus on usable results, the safety action plan will emphasize a data - informed strategic approach to roadway safety through prioritization and implementation of improvement projects so that CMAP can apply for additional SS4A funding in 2025. hdiriiiruc„acouvnu I At HDR, we dt o rringsht tt th rigo make greaing go ssible. p HDR, �d I II Village of Mount Prospect I Caro irall Road Raiilllroad CIi Phase II 11"ingiii. StStudyII I iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillI 4. SCOPE OF WORK cc ; 11111iroject Understanding Mount Prospect, with its fair share of intersections along Northwest Highway that have I cherish the at -grade crossings with the UPRR tracks, knows all too well the juxtaposition between opportunity moving rail traffic vs. roadway users. Trying to solve all the issues is no small task as HDR to embark on is aware of having worked on the Rail Crossing Feasibility Study for the Village. Common to a new challenge. Throughout many of the alternatives developed was the flexibility of the local roadway network that my career, I take past includes Central Road. While grand plans can be considered as ways to address issues, experiences and use them to often a series of smaller improvements can have a positive impact such as the planned help approach once thought platform extension for the Metra station. unsolvable problems. Having presented projects before Evaluating the Central Road intersection with Northwest Highway is another opportunity elected officials throughout to implement small changes that can have a lasting benefit for the area not only for my career, I appreciate the vehicles but for non -motorized users as well. HDR is quite familiar with the operations time to interact helping them of the Central Road intersection as our Area Manager, Tom Hein, travels through this understand complex and intersection daily. often new ideas allowing f�rillVr`I/Irllf IhP .^�lf.F1'(f"!at , I,IIYP,t` �"faalhf tlrE�",", lights (d0'al IIII ral<,fr l !d'r+�' this fYll(f IY 1I4 (1,' 1l f! I"j/ rlra lfi (1V(1f(I Il'rra Irl(hrE Af all I them to make informed decisions. I look forward r ti)'tle I e(,: Whf / the intersection sorra (�, rn ;tion t (,he rvlaay it does railrf tfilnk there are o),,) ortunitirs,a worth expfa it-rg to see what can be r;Ilane to to the opportunity to see what we can do for Mount t IrrIf)rovr, the flov�l of tr (,lf fir. cis wrrfl rr,s r outirrr� f rrr aarO bikes Prospect and this gateway � to Downtown as there are ori°r IIP°°dein, III°�!''p great opportunities to make a Il...OUwlj� positive difference The intersection of Central Road with Northwest Highway has clear operational issues especially on the west leg of the intersection. It also has some inefficiencies with the in so many people's lives. 99 mobility of non -motorized travelers through the area. On top of that, there are other minor aspects of the intersection that could be addressed such as improved corner radii. Developing solutions to these identified problems can be accomplished through analysis Jeffur y Youn& PE, PTOE of data and engineering design. However, finding solutions that are also acceptable to the PROJECT- MANAGER key stakeholders will be the challenge. HDR has the experience, resources, and people to engage IDOT, UPRR, ICC, and others to find common ground. hdirii nic. coinni I At HDR, we do U)ings right to make great things possible. 28 I II Vil1lage of Mount Prospect I Ceintirall Road IRaiilliroad Cirossiiirng Phrase II IEl.irnginneeinung II Study I In addition to the technical objectives, there is the objective to be mindful of the Village's financial resources especially in this Phase I as it is funded entirely by the Village. The goals of the project are to engage the key stakeholders strategically, find solutions to improve the intersection, and address the financial needs of the project. I11:1lr jcI I Ir h To accomplish these goals, the Village has identified a Phase I Study following the federal process. A Phase I Study following the federal process will allow the Village to seek and remain eligible for future funding opportunities as the project moves forward into Phase II Design and ultimately, Phase III Construction. However, because of the complexities of an at -grade railroad crossing, there are several stakeholders that will have the ultimate say as to what can be done at the intersection. It is for this reason that HDR proposes a stepped approach to this project with consideration of the Village's budgets and needs. Based on our experience, a two -stepped approach is proposed. Sfince passage of t1iie IIII'I IIIIiair i an Illlui �"uir� �°° uu iiiui,iii 2021, 1 IIIII') I has w llrictiIN1 $2,1111dI1 iiiiiiin dgcr�iil!! io�a ry grant °III'Iiiiiiiiiirmifliiirmg � �o iin���iuore IlIhain II00 IIII' : ec! appficatkmsiii 'TAS II I :IIII "'rill:"I Illi:" nOIN 0111PEIRKnOIN AINAIIIYSIIIS AINID Ili IIII IIII III,,,,Ilf All ,,,ITIIII II II TI1 Illii The purpose of Task 1 is to make sure the Village does rot expend unnecessary effort in terms of time and money finding solutions that could be rejected by IDOT or UPRR. Both Central Road and Northwest Highway are under MM d*#,,,,ll,l.0 IDOT's jurisdiction and thus the intersection as well. The UPRR has jurisdiction over the railroad right-of-way. The Illinois Commerce Commission also will need to be engaged should geometric improvements be proposed at the intersection and/or changes to gate crossings. At any point in the process, the Village's ultimate plan for the intersection could be "derailed" by these entities. Therefore, it will be important to have flexibility in the project and begin coordination early. The initial analyses performed along with potential geometric alternatives will be submitted to the stakeholders early to get their initial Input. It is envisioned that they will have comments that may result in changes to what was developed or fatal flaws eliminating some designs. A key characteristic of the intersection that complicates potential changes is how Prospect Avenue is integrated with the railroad crossing and thus the traffic signal phasing. HDR is prepared for the possibility of some alternatives being eliminated having coordinated with IDOT and the UPRR on other projects. We could vet this likelihood with the Village first to identify potential fallback designs. Because of the potential for back and forth with the stakeholders, a high-level evaluation of potential geometry is proposed to start. This was most recently done by HDR for Cook County when evaluating Road Diet options along an IDOT roadway. This evaluation can be accomplished using special CAD planning tools along with publicly available 2 -foot contours to save time and funding during this task. Safe Movementfoir All Safety is an important factor at any intersection but is then heightened with a railroad grade crossing. The IDOT Safety IIsdiriiiruc„acoini I At HDR, we do Unngs right to rnake great thrngs possible. 29 I II Vil1lage of Mount Prospect ( Ceinflrall Road IRaiilllroad CIrossiiing Ip1hase II IEl.inginneeining II Study I portal from 2018 to 2022 shows that the number of crashes overall at the intersection have increased steadily over this 5 -year period. During the same period, the number of Injury crashes appears to have also increased. It will be important to fully analyze the crashes to demonstrate to the stakeholders the safety record of the intersection. A review of the west leg, just west of Prospect Avenue also reveals a safety need with eastbound front to rear crashes that illustrate the geometric issues challenging the intersection. llirll�t�m°;Jockvia r�ul and Illlf illl�iyc�r���,ii Opportunities A IIIC':�lul III':Ave The Mount Prospect Bicycle Plan conducted a survey of the High School students and staff that identified a series of roadways that are desired corridors to use, one of which being Central Road. With an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume of over 17,000 based on IDOT's ADT online portal, on road cycling is not the optimal solution. An off-road bike path separating pedestrians and cyclists from roadway traffic would enhance the safety of the area thereby encouraging more people to walk or ride a bike. Establishing a design for this project to help facilitate this overall corridor vision could be accomplished regardless of the outcome from Task 1. Looking specifically at other opportunities for pedestrian and bicycle enhancements, the northwest corner presents a challenge with crossing Northwest Highway at Central Road due to the small island that is used for a two-stage crossing. Again, looking at the ADT for Northwest Highway (just over 10,000 on the northwest leg of Central Road intersection), an opportunity may exist for a road -diet to develop a more Complete Street design to redistribute pavement from vehicles to non -motorized users. This review could have broad Implications to improve not only pedestrian safety crossing but also improve mobility for non -motorized travelers as Northwest Highway has been identified as a Priority Corridor in the NWMC Multimodal Transportation Plan. The overall objective of Task 1 is to conclude with the preliminary approval from the key stakeholders of one to two solutions for the intersection. Once these solutions are developed, then Task 2 can commence which would be the remaining activities performed in a Phase I Study. Because the alternatives have been vetted, the remaining scope of work for Task 2 can be more clearly defined resulting in a more efficient budget. This 2 -stepped approach is vital to the success of the project because it is possible that a solution preferred by the Village is unable to gain support from the key stakeholders. This would conclude the project at the end of Task 1 without the Village expending the full Phase I budget. 11rrr ��rlr,fr ,rear f,( rr r„ C I Comments 69 fail j7 avf -I,�sr vire I,rrrr Metra Stations WIN � h "sm NWMC Priority Corridors 13w '*wnv .' •- Existing 6111 r.r t GtcS Plein d •••(`tanexisti rrg 16,1 S,gur'uf Ort'her NWMC Bike Facilities 1 rtp'tla n� g ' Eris ing v4r t4c.•, ,;, Ind Mount NanexieYing-Plslmed "rr E prospect h7 orrcxraJting ,r Major Regional Trails O�ivact s� N rraspsroac. fl�kra C)1'k Irl Fvr^r'yYI r;r F'^'e Ave � � '^ wflolh '1 :, Metra Lines tur7'iity Maps cranR-utrrS C`Jp-xenSt __tiiiap,.. Excerpt from the NWMC Online GIS portal Ilndidirm. c®uv-u I At HDR, we do Unngs right to rnake great th(ngs possible. iZ I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceinfirall Road Iltaiilliroad GrosMing Phase II II°:inl,giuneeiriiirng StStudyII I HDR envisions that the project can move into Task 2 with two possibilities. The first is an alternative with roadway improvements to the intersection, especially on the west leg, that are acceptable to the key stakeholders. The other possibility is that only pedestrian and bicycle improvements can gain stakeholder support along with other minor improvements such as turning radii as well as overall aesthetics of the project area. Either outcome from Task 1 will still allow the Village to move forward with improvements to the area that includes the following: • Turning movement geometry especially for larger vehicles • Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements • Signal timing/ phasing recommended modifications to the interconnected system • Evaluate aesthetic treatments to the area including wayfinding The following Task 2 subtasks have been developed where each task would be modified based on the anticipated preferred alternative. field Survey Full field survey will be conducted upon determination of full extend of improvements to be designed. Initial alternatives in Task 1 can be developed using existing 2 -foot contour data. A drone survey could be added to capture video of activity worth sharing with key stakeholders to demonstrate issues in the project area. IIS°Iii llllii°M:1t 0f 111 r4f nation Existing municipal utility atlases will be obtained, and if available in GIS, incorporated quickly into the project design files. A J.U.L.I.E. design locate will also be called prior to surveying to pick up all known utilities to verify Village documentation. wuvm wmwuw wewmteM Stu d e!s The Environmental Screening and subsequent ESR will be submitted to IDOT. A PESA should be performed by IDOT given both Central Road and Northwest Highway are under the State's jurisdiction; however, this could change depending on the extent of the improvements onto the local roadway system. ircea'euwred A terrwat'Mve IIi�'�IiieveWoSw ent The development of a preferred alternative will be finalized to determine the full extent of the project's needs. This will also include an Intersection Design Study (IDS) which is anticipated to be required by IDOT. This will Include ADA detail ramp design. While this historically has been done during Phase II, IDOT requires this effort done in Phase I to make sure that the right-of-way needs are fully determined. Icwwlll:at cwn III';i1mce'Mw ,�li�lge ""1111""wecSeiiicaM Men ii�ii„uw°ewl111111uwwcnl The project area is not within the Weller Creek floodplain and once Task 1 is concluded; the drainage analysis can be scoped accordingly. IIsdiriionc„acoini I At HDR, we do fhingg; right to make great things possible. 31 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceinfirall Road Railliroad GrosMing Phase II II°:in,giineeiriiing StStudyII I estheiIV s,11''1 WayfiiiY•idnY llg development Branding is an important part of communities to help give residents, businesses, and visitors a clear understanding of where they are. This can instill a sense of pride in the community. HDR will look at opportunities to extend the Village's vision for aesthetics into the project as applicable to reinforce and introduce Mount Prospect to travelers in the area. "III"`iraf fiilll��: MAens!,�'ii�;illlM'ient Anaysis "'fib" h.mflng illl��mn' truc:tios staging Should a detour be required, additional scope would be needed based on IDOT's input. This could include additional traffic analyses and coordination with the IDOT Detour Committee. ii't hilic Illlul ^uoMoer'n°ulln:ur r It is possible that only one Public Information Meeting is needed based on the extent of variability of the alternatives and feedback from all stakeholders. A drone survey if added for data collection, could also be used to share operational issues with stakeholders. II)riiIi)Jc�I�ct IIII'to°a'efil'wri'uarmeri,t IIIiIlkofun'wmrt for IIIIIIi�'�u,tBIII��� ���0" iiHWA aysfmr�a'n%ai The current IDOT BLR form (recently updated as of February 9, 2024) will be used to document the project for IDOT Bureau of Local Roads and the Federal Highway Administration's approval. Meetings Additional project coordination meetings with key stakeholders will be provided based on the input during Task 1. Quality Aon r"r" l ,11'1" QeaMM't'',y Assurance At HDR, we take Quality Control very serious developing a plan unique to each project. The plan, scrutinized through our Quality Assurance, is adhered to for all major deliverables where independent subject matter experts will conduct their review prior to submitting to the Village. Grant i' eWmr" iW"nI;IGy,a°!'nl':+iI':nacill,"" Once the data has been analyzed, the available grants can be considered to determine which most align with the project's ultimate design. HDR will help identify the optimal grants for this project as some can be more selective or have greater competition. The purpose here is to make sure that the Village's budget is used strategically. HDR has extensive grant experience. Some potential grants for this project are the following: SS4A — HDR secured over $3M for CMAP to conduct County Safety Studies that includes Cook County. HDR will be performing the safety study for CMAP for Lake County. Grade Crossing Protection (GCP) - As this intersection involves a railroad crossing, it is an appropriate grant to apply for. That said, IDOT's own circular letter from last December stated that less emphasis is place on roadway approach projects. However, since this is an IDOT intersection, and with them as a key stakeholder, their support for this project could be well received when applying. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) — With nearby schools and the potential for improved pedestrian and bicycle mobility, this grant could be considered for those pedestrian and bicycle improvements. IIsdiriionc„acoini I At HDR, we do fhingg; right to make great things possible. 32 I II Village of Mount Prospect I Ccintirall Road Raiilliroad CirosMing Phase II II°:in,giineeiriiuog StStudyII I Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program (ITEP) — Jim McNally has managed ITEP funded projects in the past include a sidewalk project for the Village of Grayslake on Illinois Route 83. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) — While an excellent source for safety funding, because this Is a state jurisdiction intersection, local projects cannot apply for the State's allotment. Jim McNally has direct experience in a locally led project on a state route applying for HSIP funding in Lake County. Also, without Type A injury crashes or fatalities, the cost -benefit analysis likely will not result in favorable selection. Invest in Cook — HDR has worked closely with Cook County developing GIS tools for CCDOTH to evaluate applications for this grant. With a close understanding of this grant, it will help position the Village to determine whether this grant should be sought. Surface Transportation Program (STP) - Local — Jeff Young, while at McHenry County, oversaw the McHenry County Council of Mayors (counterpart to the NWMC) developing and managing the Local STP program. This may prove to be a well suited grant for this project. As with all grants, timing is very important. Oftentimes, applying too early in a project is not wise as projects are evaluated based on how close they are to construction. HDR will help identify not only which grants should be pursued, but when. III,UIE A11D11DSIIfi IIIA II Ilfiii'S HDR is a full-service engineering firm providing you with the expertise in many fields. In evaluating this project for the Village, there are several tasks that could be needed during Task 2. The need for additional subtasks during Task 2 will be dependent upon the outcome of Task 1. Should improvements at the intersection require a full closure, coordination with IDOT regarding a detour will be needed. This will likely include additional traffic counts along a proposed detour route, additional traffic analyses, meeting with the IDOT Detour Committee, and the corresponding report. A potential detour route could use the triangle of Central Road, Arlington Heights Road, and Northwest Highway. HDR has the experience in coordinating with IDOT regarding detour needs. HDR has used on many occasions, video obtained by UAV (unmanned aerial vehicles) or drones, to help tell the story of a project. This footage can be useful to convey traffic operations to key stakeholders such as IDOT as well as the public including elected officials. The drone footage can then be overlayed with isometric renderings of potential improvements to demonstrate oftentimes difficult to visualize concepts. Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment (PESA) could be done entirely by IDOT since both Central Road and Northwest Highway are under their jurisdiction. Should some of the improvements extend onto the Village roadway network, it is possible that IDOT will require the Village to perform the PESA for these areas. HDR is fully equipped to conduct these assessments as do this routinely on all our Phase I studies. Ilndiriionc„acoini I At HDR, we do fhingg; right to make great things possible. 33 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( Ceintirall Road IRailliroaad Cirossiiing I'llhiase 11 El.inginneeining. Study R ------ ---- ---- --- Data Collection Surveys - ---- ----- ----- ---- --- ----------------------------------------------------------- Traffic and Safety ------------------------------------------------ --------- ----------- ---- --------------------- ------ ---- ------ ----- Intersection Alternatives Analysis ------------------------------------------------ ---- --------- --------- ... ........... ........... -------------- ................ .... ----- ---------- ---- ---------- Surveys ------------------------------------------------ ---- ------ ---- Utility Identification and Coordination ------------------------------------------------ -------------------- ---- .. ............. ............ ........... ............. .......... . ............ ............ ............ ......... ----- ---- ---------- ----- Environmental Studies ------------------------------------------------ ---- ----- ---- . ............ ........... ............. ............. .......... .. ............. . . . . ----- ---- ---------- --------------------- Traffic and Safety ------------------------------------------------ ----- ---- ---------- ----- . ............. ............ ............ ............. .......... .. ............ . . . . ---------------- Intersection Alternatives Analysis ------------------------------------------------ ---- -------------- ----- ----- ----------- Preferred Alternative Analysis ------------------------------------------------ ---- ----- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- Intersection Design Study ------------------------------------------------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- .. ............ .... ...... ............. ........... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ . . . . ---- ---- ----- Location Drainage Technical Memorandum ------------------------------------------------ --------- --------- . . . . . . . . . . ............ ......... ----- ---- ---------------- --------------------- Aesthetics/ Wayfincling ------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---- ---------- ---- ----- ---- --------------------- ---- ------ ----------- Traffic Management Analysis ------------------------------------------------ ----- --------------- --------------- -------------------------- ---- ----------- ---- ---------------- ------ ----------- Public Involvement 0 ------------------------------------------------ ---- --------- ----- ---- -------------------- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- --------- Project Development Report ------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---- ---------------------------------- . ............ Grant Funding Assistance ------------------------------------------------- Meetings -------------------------------------------------- Project Administration ----------------------------------------------------------- ............ ........... ............ ............ . .......... ............ ............ ............ . .......... ............ ............ ........... .. ......... ............ ............ ............. ............ ... Quality Control / Quality Assurance ------------------------------------------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------- l..11:.:G11:.lHII) IIII Stalkelhollder MeLfing 0 Public Ilirnvellvernenf Meetiling Isdirlinc.coii-ii-ii I At HDR, we do H)inqs right to make grect thing s posslhle, 34 I II Village of Mount Prospect ( CeinVirall Road IRaiilliroaad Cirossiiing Ilalluase II IEl.inginneeining SfStudyII I COST P111101POSA111,,,, H DR proposes a stepped approach with two primary tasks. The effort done during Task 1 will be used during Task 2 as the project moves forward to effort is maximized. The hours for the various sub -tasks for Task 1 are listed below. The cost for Task 1 is $62,439. The cost for Task 2, as proposed here for this approach, is for an additional $366,654. The cost for Task 2 may likely vary pending the outcome of Task 1, thus the reason to have the initial analysis and key stakeholder coordination occur in Task 1. The sub -tasks and their corresponding hour for Task 2 are also listed below. IM Ull IS II::. IR 011:: P IR O IIS O S II::'. II:D S 1f If IfUU O Uy IR .S Data Collection 67 - 67 Surveys ------cation __ _________ _____ 10 ________ _________ ___ 200 _ _________ _22____ _________ 210 ______ ________22__m Utility Id and Coordination -----------------------------------------------_ .0__ ------------------------ Environmental Studies Traffic and Safety 95 154 249 Intersection Alternatives Analysis -----------------------------------------------_ 143 215 358 Preferred Alternative Analysis _------------------------ Intersection Design Study - 112 112 Location Drainage Technical _ 418 418 Memorandum ----------------------------------------------- Aesthetics/ Wayfinding ------------------------------------------------_ _ 1 1 ______ _______,___ Traffic Management Analysis ________ _________ _-----------------------------------_ ----------------------------------------------- 65 ______ _________ PublicInvolvement -----------------------------------------------_ 255 255 Project DevelopmentReport -----------------------------------------------_ 210 210 ______ ___________ Grant Funding Assistance 113 113 Meetings 83 53 136 Project Administration 44 _10_________ 132 176 Quality Control-- Quality 82____ 92__. Assurance PROJECT TOTAL 452 2,680 3,005 IIsdiriionc„ac®unn I At HDR, we do H)ings right to make great thmqs possible. 35 I� 9450 West Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 773.380.7900 hdrinc.com We practice increased use of sustainable materials and reduction of material use. © 2022 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. �Q. FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study Village of Mount Prospect Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study Scope of Work June 24, 2024 The Village is looking to address pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular issues at the Central Road Railroad crossing and the intersections of Central Road with Northwest Highway (US 14) and Prospect Avenue. The first step of rebuilding this crossing and intersections is a Phase I Engineering Study. A key component of the Mount Prospect Strategic Plan is to partner with appropriate government agencies to resolve troublesome intersection issues. One such location is the area surrounding the Central Road at -grade crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad. This includes the railroad crossing and the intersections of Central Road with US 14 and Prospect Avenue. Together these intersections act as the western gateway to downtown Mount Prospect. Pedestrian and bicycle accommodations at these intersections are minimal and require long crossing distances. Vehicle delays are primarily due to the crossing being activated by trains, but the left turn movement from eastbound Central Road onto northwest bound US 14 is particularly problematic due to limited storage for vehicles turning left. The Village is committed to developing and implementing a plan that will provide significant enhancements to the transportation system benefiting pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, nearby businesses, and our residents. Central Road and US 14 are under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Prospect Avenue is under local jurisdiction. The traffic signals at Central Road and Prospect Avenue as well as Central Road and US 14 are owned and maintained by IDOT. The railroad crossing signals are owned and maintained by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). The Village has completed numerous studies in the past that refence this railroad crossing, but none that directly address the issues described in this request. Improving pedestrian and bicycle facilities, enhancing safety for vehicles crossing the railroad tracks and traveling through the intersection, improving truck turning movements, addressing the blocked thru lane concerns on eastbound Central Road at the tracks, and enhancing the aesthetics within the project area are primary goals of the project. The following scope of work details the tasks to be completed for the Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study. The study will comply with IDOT Bureau of Local Roads and Streets (BLRS) and Bureau of Design and Environment (BDE) Manual guidelines to enable consideration of a variety of funding sources. The project will start the coordination IDOT and FHWA where ultimately their approval would be required to complete the Phase I Study. Coordination with the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) and the UPRR will be required for the Phase I Study. The project also requires coordination with other stakeholders including the Village Board and the public. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 500.18-52.73 (773) 380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study Task 1: Data Collection Data will be collected and used throughout the study. A site visit will be conducted to document physical features, existing information will be collecting in GIS as available, current high- resolution aerial imager will be collected, and as -built plans and historical studies will also be collected. A. TRAFFIC AND CRASH DATA Traffic count information will be collected in 15 -minute intervals for a 24-hour weekday period which will include vehicle classifications. The locations to be collected are as follows: • Central Road at US 14 • Central Road at Prospect Avenue • Central Road at South Wa Pella Avenue • Prospect Avenue at Hi Lusi The most recent five -years of crash data will be obtained through the IDOT online crash data portal for the area. The Village will provide additional information if available. C. HYDRAULIC/DRAINAGE STUDIES Any historical hydraulic/drainage studies completed for the area will be obtained from the Village and / or IDOT. In addition, HDR will request the following data regarding hydrology/hydraulics of the project area, if available: • Records from the Village regarding the documentation, identification, repairing, and/or maintenance of drainage problems within the project area as well as projects for the area. • USGS Hydrologic Investigation Atlas • FEMA Flood Insurance Study D. SITE VISIT A site visit will be made to make field observations documenting operations during peak weekday traffic periods. Field photos will be taken, and a photo log will be created. Task 1 Deliverables: Turning movement traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle counts; photo log; aerial map imagery; and inventory of existing data. Task 2: Topographic Survey A. EXISTING CONDITIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY The survey will meet or exceed the Minimum Standards of Practice as set forth by Illinois Administrative Code for a Topographic Survey. GHA will utilize a combination of conventional robotic total station along with UAS Drone Photogrammetry and LiDAR. Appropriate railroad safety and entry regulations will be observed. Accordingly, we will provide the following services: 1. Obtain benchmark information (NAVD88) from USGS, the Village of Mt. Prospect, or Trimble VRS Now Network. 2. Horizontal coordinates shall be referenced to the State Plane Coordinate System, Illinois East Zone, NAD83 adjustment. Vertical elevations shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). All units shall be U.S. Survey feet and decimal parts thereof. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 500.18-52.73 (773) 380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study 3. Establish 5 (five) permanent site benchmark(s) (i.e. crosses or boxes cut on concrete, flange bolts on fire hydrants, etc.) on site. 4. Contours will be provided at V-0" intervals, with an error not to exceed one-half the contour interval. 5. Elevations will be taken at 50 -foot cross sections across the right-of-way width along the limits of survey, including spot grades at high points, low points, and grade changes. Points required are located at the right-of-way line, sidewalk, driveways and aprons, back of curb, flow line, centerline/concrete median, top of railroad rail, etc. The topography will extend approximately 15 feet beyond the existing roadway ROW. The survey limits will also extend 50 feet into the intersecting public side streets along the project limits. (See attached Limits of Survey exhibit) 6. The survey will show the location of the visible ground features, physical improvements with the project limits including location and elevation of light poles, utility poles, traffic lights, sidewalks, driveways, fences, guard rails, signage, striping, overhead wires, etc. 7. The location of underground utilities, both observed and from record information such as Village utility atlases, will be provided and will including location and size of water mains, fire hydrants and valves. The survey will show depth, size, and direction of flow for all sanitary, storm drains, and culverts serving the property. The location of all manholes, catch basins and all pipe inverts that are accessible from will be depicted. 8. Location of "dry" utilities such as telephone, electric, gas and cable T.V. lines, etc. will be depicted based on visual surface evidence and available utility atlas information from the respective utility companies. The cost for marking of private utilities is not included in this proposal, but GHA will include this information if the Village arranges to have private utilities marked in the field prior to the field visit. 9. Locate existing tree and brush lines in the right-of-way (ROW). Individual free-standing trees of 4" caliper or greater at breast height (DBH) will be individually located (tagging and identification are not included); and will be shown as deciduous or coniferous. Groupings of trees or landscaped areas will be shown in mass. B. RIGHT-OF-WAY SURVEY — LEVEL THREE BOUNDARY Obtain all necessary documentation and complete a survey of the right-of-way (ROW) within project limits for the purposes of establishing the ROW. When doing a plat of highway, dedication, or easement, it is necessary to obtain title commitments or deed of the parcels that will dedicate right-of-way or grant easements. The effort and cost to obtain title commitments is not included and is assumed to be done during Phase II design engineering. 1. Research available plats and property records. 2. Locate and survey the existing property monumentation in the project area and establish the position of the ROW lines within the project limits. 3. Locate and survey monuments on side lot property lines along the ROW that will be within the project limits. 4. Side lot property line monuments will not be located or surveyed along the ROW within the project limits. If it is determined that the side lot property lines need to be surveyed due to acquisition of ROW or easements, a supplement of services will be needed time to research, field locate, and survey of any side lot property lines. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 500.18-52.73 (773) 380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study C. CREATE BASE MAPS HDR will develop base maps from the ground survey, existing plan sheets, and aerial mapping from Nearmap. These maps will be used as the base for preliminary design plans and study exhibits. Task 2 Deliverables: Topographic Survey, Base Maps, and Right -of -Way Survey. Task 3: Utility Identification and Coordination HDR will request and collect the utility data from existing service providers and incorporate it into CAD, conflicts between the proposed plan and utility infrastructure will be assessed to identify potential conflicts for Phase II Design. Record utility maps from the Village for all known local utilities will be obtained. Task 3 Deliverables: Compiling of utility data provided by service providers. Task 4: Environmental Studies The project will be processed through the IDOT Bureau of Local Roads and Streets and is anticipated to be processed as a Categorical Exclusion that does not involve significant environmental impacts. Below are the steps that will be taken and special studies to be performed to identify environmental resources and the potential for impact. A. ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY MAP A GIS -based environmental inventory map will be prepared that includes identified environmental resources and existing and proposed right-of-way within the study area. This map can also be used for public discussions and to delineate locations of resources and potential for impact. B. ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY REQUEST (ESR) FORM Prepare and submit the forms and exhibits as required for BDE 2715 Local Roads Natural Resources Screening. HDR anticipates that both a Level 1 screening and Level 2 screening will be required for this project. The form and all requisite exhibits are submitted to the District Bureau of Local Roads for review, who will then forward to the Central Office BLRS for review. HDR anticipates that the biological and wetland resources will be cleared through the Level 2 screening. However, cultural resources and special waste will require the submittal of an ESR form to IDOT. This will include the Environmental Inventory Map and other supporting documentation. C. SPECIAL WASTE Both Central Road and U.S. 14 are under IDOT's jurisdiction. Therefore, it is assumed that all special waste work will be completed by IDOT including any nominal aeras along Village right- of-way. If required, IDOT will conduct the Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment (PESA) on the State routes and along Village and railroad right-of-way. HDR will summarize the results in the PDR. A PESA validation is not included in the scope of this project. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 6001.8-5273 (773)380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study D. TREE SURVEY A survey to identify and evaluate trees within the study area will be performed. A report will be produced to summarize the quantity, quality and type of trees that would be and estimated mitigation cost. Exclusions: a. Cultural Resources: This scope assumes that IDOT will conduct all cultural resource surveys and Section 106 consultation. HDR's scope is limited to that contained in Task 4B. b. Special Waste: This scope assumes that IDOT will conduct all special waste work. HDR's scope is limited to that contained in Task 4C. c. Section 4(f): Structures that are considered eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are protected under Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966. There are several buildings over 40 years old in the study area which IDOT will evaluate for NRHP- eligibility. This scope assumes that no buildings or structures are considered NRHP- eligible and therefore no Section 4(f) is required. d. Traffic Noise Study e. Bridge Bat Assessment Form Assumptions: • If changes are made to the design that require an Addendum ESR, a supplement will be required. • No Section 4(f) or 6(f) properties are located in the project area. • No cultural historic or archaeological work, other than stated in scope, is included. • No environmental justice populations are present. • No environmental regulatory agency coordination by HDR is included. • Access to properties for fieldwork will be provided by Village. • HDR is not responsible for the IDOT-prepared surveys and reports, including the schedule for completion and submittal. Task 4 Deliverables: Natural Resource Screening Form & Exhibits; ESR Form & Exhibits; Tree report. Task 5: Traffic and Safety Analyses A. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The traffic counts collected will be reviewed for accuracy. A letter to CMAP will be sent with the existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to obtain No Build and Build 2050 traffic projections. The AM and PM Peak Hour Design Hourly volumes will be determined to conduct traffic analyses. Traffic operational analyses will be performed for the existing and future conditions (No Build and Build) for the Central Road / Prospect Avenue / U.S. Route 14 intersection using Synchro software. The operational analyses will be conducted for the AM and PM weekday peak hours identified following the Highway Capacity Manual approach. A signal warrant analysis will be performed if required by IDOT. Observe the performance of the traffic signal timings at the site and document those findings in a memorandum that will be submitted to Village and potentially IDOT. The purpose of the Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 6001.8-5273 (773)380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study observation will be to determine if there is room for improving traffic flow with a re -timing of the current IDOT interconnected signal system, as well as a request to IDOT to re -time the traffic signals, if applicable. The interconnected system includes the following intersections: • U.S. 14 at Central Road • U.S. 14 at IL 83 • U.S. 14 at Emerson Street • I L 83 at Central Road B. SAFETY ANALYSIS The crash data collected will be tabulated in GIS, analyzed, and exhibits will be prepared that can be easily understood by all communicating critical areas and trends. A The crash analysis will help inform the needs assessment for the study area, and potentially lend to project objectives during the alternatives' development. The effort will include the following: • A crash diagram for up to 3 intersections and the segment of Central Road west of Prospect Avenue using the last 5 years of crash data. • A crash analysis to evaluate the frequency, severity, and recommended countermeasures. • It is assumed that the Crash Analysis will not be updated during Phase I study. Task 5 Deliverables: Traffic and Safety Memorandum and a Signal System Observation Review Memorandum. Task 6: Intersection Alternatives Analysis The goal of the Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study is to improve mobility and increase safety. Up to four (4) intersection alternatives will be developed to determine opportunities to achieve the project goals. During the alternatives development, the following will be developed: • Horizontal and vertical alignments • Multi -modal concepts • Cross sections — existing and proposed • Preliminary right-of-way needs • High level cost estimates • Exhibits to present the alternatives to stakeholders (Village staff, elected officials, IDOT, ICC, UPRR, public, etc.) • Summary report documenting the alternatives studied along with their associated impacts and benefits to achieve the project goals Task 7: Preferred Alternative Analysis Once the preferred alternative has been identified, the final alignment can be designed at a Phase I level of detail adhering to IDOT BLRS and BDE design criteria. The following sheets will constitute the preliminary engineering design plans for Phase I. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 6001.8-5273 (773)380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study • Plan & Profile • Typical and Proposed Cross Sections • Pavement Design • Cost Estimate • ADA Ramp Design • Right-of-way needs (fee simple and temporary easements) • Design exceptions — assumes up to two (2) may be needed Task 7 Deliverables: Plan and Profile, Typical Sections, Cross -Sections, Cost Estimate, Design Exceptions, and Pavement Design. Task 8: Intersection Design Study An Intersection Design Study (IDS) is a comprehensive product that is a culmination of several analyses that are performed. These include vehicle design using the AutoTurn CAD tool, detailed ADA sidewalk and curb ramp design, geometric design, and operational analyses. One intersection is scoped for this project at the Central Road / Prospect Avenue / U.S. Route 14. The IDS will not be completed until after the preferred alternative has been identified. Task 8 Deliverables: One Intersection Design Study. Task 9: Drainage Study HDR will prepare a Location Drainage Technical Memo (LDTM) consistent with IDOT criteria and standards to identify the drainage needs and/or problems associated with the project. Development of the drainage study is an opportunity to coordinate with stakeholders and to consider and document local agency concerns, regulations, and needs. Since Central Road and US 14 are state rights of ways, IDOT will review the LDTM. The LDTM will include the analyses of the existing and proposed drainage conditions for the Preferred Alternative improvements within the project area. Tasks include: A. EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM Prepare the General Location Drainage Map. Maps will show current drainage features, structures, floodplains, drainage divides, drainage patterns, sewer areas, and governmental boundaries. Determine any identified drainage problems. Based on information obtained during Task 1 (Data Collection), existing drainage problems will be identified and documented. Field visit. The existing site is tributary to Wellers Creek and the Des Plaines River and encompasses the Central Road closed drainage system. Perform field investigation of the existing corridor for review of the existing drainage system, identified problem areas, and other drainage features. Review of the corridor within the project limits will be performed for identification of possible major drainage features including detention facilities and drainage channels. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 500.18-52.73 (773) 380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study B. PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM Identify Design Criteria used in the analysis. Permitting/ drainage criteria requirements of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD) Watershed Management Ordinance (WMO) and IDOT drainage criteria will be determined. Local regulatory requirements will be identified for stormwater detention, wetlands and buffers and soil erosion and sediment control. It is noted that preparation and submittal of a stormwater permit application is not included in this scope of work; it is assumed this application would be included in the Phase II design process. Perform outlet evaluation. The project is in a highly developed downtown business district, and the drainage is collected in a closed system along Central Road. Qualitative evaluation, which may include review of written/ verbal records and field observations of drainage features will be performed for determination of unsuitable and/or sensitive outlets. Additional evaluation of outlets identified as unsuitable and/or sensitive will be performed as part of the "Stormwater Detention Analysis" and/or "Drainage Alternatives" subtasks described below, portion of the LDTM. Stormwater Detention Analysis. This task involves the evaluation of detention requirements in accordance with the governing design criteria for those outlets in which detention was recommended during the Outlet Evaluation subtask described below. This scope assumes detention will not be required. Drainage Alternatives. This task involves the qualitative analysis of feasible alternative drainage concepts and recommendation of a preferred drainage alternative. The drainage alternatives will be identified during the development of the proposed drainage plans and may include conceptual layout of drainage systems including approximate location, shape, and size. A maximum of two (2) drainage alternatives will be investigated, and the qualitative analysis performed in this task assumes no hydraulic modeling or detailed plan/profile sheets. Right -of -Way Analysis. This task involves a determination of the drainage right of way and easement requirements. The proposed drainage improvements should be evaluated to see if additional right of way or drainage easements are needed. Review the proposed roadway plan and template cross sections and how they relate to the existing right of way. Review the right of way and easement needs for outlet pipes, pump stations, ditch drainage, culvert extensions and detention ponds. Proposed Drainage Plan (PDP).This task involves the preparation of a PDP, with drainage symbols and notes on exhibit(s), and appropriate wording in the LDTM text which fully describes the proposed drainage concept. The configuration and size of the proposed "closed" portion of the storm sewer drainage system will be evaluated using the Geopak model prepared for detention analysis. The purpose of the PDP is to illustrate the proposed drainage features and overall concept to the extent necessary to identify: • Reinstatement of the existing drainage patterns • Sub areas to each outlet • Diversions • Potential utility conflicts • Maintain, replace, or construct storm sewers and special drainage structures • Maintain, re -grade, or construct ditches and/ or swales • Location for proposed storm water detention Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 6001.8-52.73 (773)380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study C. DRAINAGE REPORT Compile the information developed for the existing and proposed drainage plans and prepare a draft LDTM for review and comment by the Village of Mount Prospect and IDOT. Finalize LDTM based on the Village's comments and distribute. Task 9 Deliverables: Location Drainage Technical Memo. Task 10: Aesthetics and Wayfinding Referencing the Village's Streetscape standards, landscaping, wayfinding, and gateway treatment concepts will be developed that can be used with the roadway alternatives developed. Base templates will be developed and submitted for Village staff to review prior to incorporating into the roadway alternatives. Task 10 Deliverables: Graphics Renderings of Streetscape Concepts Task 11: Maintenace of Traffic Analysis A Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) analysis will be developed with the expectation that the project will be constructed under staged traffic. Supporting intersection capacity analyses for the weekday peak hours will be analyzed to determine to effects of the construction upon the intersection. A report will be developed documenting the analyses and recommendations. A detour analysis, report, and IDOT detour meetings are not included. Task 11 Deliverables: MOT Report and Analyses. Task 12: Public Meetings A public involvement program will provide several methods for project stakeholders with different needs to provide their input and be involved in the project. A Stakeholder Involvement Plan will be developed outlining the schedule of public involvement activities and materials to be developed during the project. Based on processing as a Categorical Exclusion, it is anticipated one public information meeting will be hosted for the project. The public will be given the opportunity to provide feedback on the preferred alternative based off their experience in the area and share any concerns about the project. HDR will create up to 8 exhibits (24" by 36") and a PowerPoint Presentation for this meeting. The HDR Team will coordinate with the Village for a meeting location that is easily accessible for stakeholders. The following tasks will be provided for the public meeting: • Workback schedule to identify tasks leading up to and following the public meeting • Newspaper legal notice (development and placement) • Postcard or letter (content, layout, mailing) to properties along the project Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 500.18-5273 (773) 380-7900 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study • Stakeholder letter or email message • Mailing list • Stakeholder list • Handout provided in paper at the meeting and provided to the Village for posting online (content, layout, printing) • Exhibits boards, up to 10 anticipated, provided in 24" x 36" at the meeting and electronically for posting online (content, layout, printing) • Presentation (if needed) • Comment forms, sign -in sheets, nametags • Meeting Plan and Dry Run • Day of meeting execution • Comment management and responses HDR will support the Village's website by providing reports, exhibits, and other document deliverables the Village desires to post to its project website. The files will be provided in a format and file size that is conducive to being download and / or viewed online by the public. Social media graphics will be developed and provided to the Village to promote the project, online survey, and public meeting engagements. An online survey will be developed that can be linked to the Village's website to obtain additional feedback from the public and stakeholders. Task 12 Deliverables: Public Meeting, Website, Online Survey, Stakeholder Involvement Plan, and Social Media Materials. Task 13: Project Development Report It is anticipated, from what is currently known about the project area, that the proposed improvement and environmental studies performed will result in the following findings of the project: • Does not induce significant impacts to planned growth or land use for the area • Does not require the relocation of significant numbers of people • Does not have a significant impact on any natural, cultural, recreational, historic, or other resource • Does not involve significant air, noise, or water quality impacts • Does not have significant impacts on travel patterns • Does not otherwise, either individually or cumulatively, have any significant environmental impacts The above stated findings will result in the preparation of a Project Development Report (PDR) resulting in a Categorical Exclusion determination. Coordination with IDOT/FHWA will be conducted for concurrence with this approach under Task 15. HDR will develop the draft and final PDR for the study. The report will follow the IDOT Bureau of Local Roads and Streets guidelines for PDR's. The report will summarize all existing conditions, the design guidelines utilized, the proposed improvement, identification of all environmental resources, summarization of impacts, if any, and the proposed mitigation, and the public involvement processes and findings. Exhibits and figures will be prepared to document the processes and findings. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 6001.8-5273 (773)380-7900 ON FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study One draft report will be prepared for the Village of Cary. Upon addressing the Village comments, a draft report will be submitted to IDOT for review and comment. One final report will be submitted upon conclusion of the public hearing at which time design approval will be requested. Task 13 Deliverables: Draft PDR to Village, Draft and Final PDR to IDOT. Task 14: Grant Writing Assistance HDR will support the Village's efforts to submit for grants for the project. The support from HDR will be to provide cost estimates, reports, exhibits, and other documents to support a grant application. HDR will also coordinate with IDOT and the ICC about the possibility of this project being eligible for State Grade Crossing Protection Funds or similar. Task 14 Deliverables: Exhibits and Cost Estimates for grant applications Task 15: Meetings Multiple agencies are impacted or interested in the outcome of the proposed project. Continuous coordination with the agencies and the project owner is essential for the success of this project. A priority at all meetings will be review of progress related to the project schedule and timing of key deliverables. The following agency coordination is provided: • A kickoff meeting with the Village will be held to discuss the project objectives, schedule, invoicing procedures, communication protocol, and deliverables. • IDOT BLRS project kick-off meeting after the existing conditions have been defined. An overview to the project purpose and need, approach, special studies needed, and schedule are provided at the kick-off meeting. IDOT BDE staff will be engaged to help determine their objectives and expectations. • An additional meeting will be held with the Village to discuss present the crash and traffic data along with high-level concepts of potential alternatives. • Two (2) meetings with IDOT Traffic and Geometrics Studies Units are proposed. Both would be held during the development of alternatives. The first meeting would be to present the crash and traffic data along with high-level concepts of potential alternatives. The second meeting would be to present the refined alternatives for the intersection. • Up to three (3) meetings with the Illinois Commerce Commission will be held. It is anticipated that one will occur during the development of high-level concepts and the other two will be to present the refined alternatives. • Up to two (2) meetings with the Union Pacific Railroad will be held. • One presentation to the Village Board is provided. The time for this presentation will be determined as the project progresses. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 6001.8-5273 (773)380-7900 H9 FNVillage of Mount Prospect I Central Road at U.S. Route 14 Phase I Study Two (1) IDOT/FHWA Coordination Meeting will be held. After the findings of the environmental studies, the proposed improvement is defined, and mitigation detailed, a meeting will occur with the FHWA/IDOT. This meeting will detail the findings of the study and recommended actions. If there are any design variances for the project they would be presented and concurred upon. This meeting is intended to gain concurrence of no significant impact, that the project can be processed as a Categorical Exclusion, and to proceed to the public meeting. The second meeting would occur after the public meeting. Task 15 Deliverables: Meeting Agendas, Handouts, and Meeting Minutes. Task 16: Project Administration Project administration including payroll, billing, monthly status reports, and filing will be performed. For budgeting purposes monthly progress meetings with the Village are assumed with 3 staff from HDR attending virtually. A 24 -month schedule is assumed. Task 16 Deliverables: Monthly invoices and status reports. Task 17: QA/QC The HDR team takes pride in their work and is committed that deliverables meet the standards for quality. A project Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan(QA/QC) will be developed. This plan will outline the day-to-day activities, as well as milestone review activities. A. DEVELOP PROJECT QA/QC PLAN HDR is dedicated to providing quality services from the technical, scheduling, communications, and production cost control standpoints. To accomplish this, HDR will develop the QA/QC Plan for this project and its deliverables. As part of this plan, HDR will maintain a QA/QC project file containing documentation of the procedures followed for verifying the overall quality of key deliverables. B. QA/QC REVIEW Assumptions, calculations, memorandums, reports, and plans will be thoroughly reviewed for accuracy and consistency before submittal to the Village. Exclusions • Pavement and soils investigation. • Wetland delineations, wetland impact evaluation forms, and coordination with agencies regarding wetlands. • ESA, PESA, Special Waste, and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment. • Air quality microscale or other quantitative air quality analyses. • Noise analysis. • Intersection / roadway lighting design. • Detour analysis, report, and meetings. Ihndriinc.com 9450 W Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 400, Rosernont, II.. 500.18-52.73 (773) 380-7900 m CL 'O P m O V d c� d a� m z m O 0 E w m a E O U 0,-6 c 49 � U U @ '- N U U O w CLo U L C Q O Q U N O E o c a) Cf) E c ~ U N o y L Y .� E O 4) Z w LO I N LU w w O Q Q U w O LU >-o X LU LU > J O a m O U W d m E m z a a z LU O Q a W U. Y v F- ... U O Z 0 W 0 Q J J J N N N a V p y C) ++ T- m t*- 04 o m W a N N a o n Qi W LWoo 0 O O -i > a z u w m a E O U 0,-6 c 49 � U U @ '- N U U O w CLo U L C Q O Q U N O E o c a) Cf) E c ~ U N o y L Y .� E O 4) Z w LO I N LU w w O Q Q U w O LU >-o X LU LU > J O a m O U W J m a a LU O Q a JO U F- Z W 0 Q J J J N N N a O N0 Cl N � C) T- m t*- 04 o m W a N N n 2ww w LWoo 0 H w a �a`R W F� �N Z O U 0 0 0 � o O M oco O 4 L6rc6 c a N In N O V cn t O C -0T O a� M NLO N O O O N N N O N O O N m N N O J N N N O LO O O O RC14 C14 N O O M co i N N LL O r N Local Public Agency County Section Numb Villaae of Mount ProSDect Cook Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number HDR Engineering, Inc PAYROLL RATES EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAID MAXIMUM PAYROLL RATEI 86.00 ESCALATION FACTORI 2.01% CLASSIFICATION IDOT PAYROLL RATES ON FILE CALCULATED RATE Principal $86.00 $86.00 Project Manager III $82.61 $84.27 Senior Civil Engineer III $81.05 $82.68 Senior Civil Engineer 1 $65.30 $66.61 Civil Engineer III $54.27 $55.36 Civil Engineer 1 $36.48 $37.21 Senior Transportation Planner $86.00 $86.00 Transportation Planner IV $72.38 $73.83 Senior Environmental Scientist $63.36 $64.63 Environmental Scientist 1 $30.78 $31.40 Senior Communications Coordinator $61.01 $62.24 Communications Coordinator 11 $46.19 $47.12 Senior Graphic Designer $41.84 $42.68 Clerical IV $46.57 $47.51 Clerical 111 $36.45 $37.18 Local Public Agency County Section Number Village of Mount Prospect Cook Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number HDR Engineering, Inc SUBCONSULTANTS EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET Total 9,628.00 NOTE: Only subconsultants who fill out a cost estimate that splits out direct labor may be I this sheet. Local Public Agency Count Village of Mount Prospect Cook Consultant / Subconsultant Name HDR Engineering, Inc DIRECT COSTS WORKSHEET List ALL direct costs required for this project. Those not listed on the form will not be eligible for rei EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS ITEM ALLOWABLE Lodging per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Actual Cost Up to state rate maximum Lodging Taxes and Fees per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Actual Cost Air Fare Coach rate, actual cost, requires minimum two weel' notice, with prior IDOT approval Vehicle Mileage per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Up to state rate maximum Vehicle Owned or Leased $32.50/half day (4 hours or less) or $65/full day Vehicle Rental Actual Cost (Up to $55/day) Tolls Actual Cost Parking Actual Cost Overtime Premium portion (Submit supporting documentation; Shift Differential Actual Cost (Based on firm's policy) Overnight Delivery/Postage/Courier Service Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (In-house) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (Outside) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Project Specific Insurance Actual Cost Monuments (Permanent) Actual Cost Photo Processing Actual Cost 2 -Way Radio (Survey or Phase III Only) Actual Cost Telephone Usage (Traffic System Monitoring Only) Actual Cost CADD Actual Cost (Max $15/hour) Web Site Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Advertisements Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Public Meeting Facility Rental Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Public Meeting Exhibits/Renderings & Equipment Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Recordina Fees Actual Cost 7 0 U C aJ IL v 0 J Cn 0 d c0 C 0 :41E 0 E m Z C N C V co O Alu LU RE W W cn Ix 0 LU Q H cn `W V/'r'^ O U w w CO Y O U W U U) w _U W U) Z Q J D U) Z O U LL O w CQ G U) w U) O U m X w O 0 F- U Q LL F- X LU J a 2 0 U O I` V I` (D CO N M M L() M N N 00 r LC) CO OJ O Lf) L[) r r O) M M O M Lf) O 00 O O O J f� M CO M M LO CO r W LO N r'11- O M CO CN I -— N M M� I— CO O CO 00 O 00 I- CO M O O O co r CV It CY) r r CO r N co N H } � co 00 m (n N N O 00 W 1" M r U w M > H W N N M�t O'It LO It Cfl I` N O Cfl (D O N CO O 00 M N CD M (D ti N 00 I` ti M Cfl Lf) r O Il - W r M M LO "T O (14 LO LO LO M't O 00 CD I,- M W r r N L() ',I- r LO r CO N N CO (N LL 0 w X LL w 0N0) M M r M ti W M W O 0 LO r M M CD z 'T NIt CD N 00 O 00 ti O M C O O I` O r LL U) CD U) CO Lf) � ti O r '�t '::t O N ti CD CD Lf) ti CD It CD O O) O '�t � N r 00 M � ~ LL r N N N r r r r p W az W w m � w 0 O r N LO LO 00 r LO N LO 00 r r Il- CO M N 00 (D 00 LO I` 't LL) N M CD M r CD I- r O W Lf) r d7 ti M M M Cfl O I'- O N LO M It r J J CO P_ Ln N CO 4 N O C4 Nr- - r- O r r r r r } a I-- ti N CD r CO O N M O LO It CO Il- (0 CO N (q CD N N O CD U) r r CD O CD 00 N M M r r CO CO r M r r r r r 0 2 LL LL Q H N m ti O ti M O M Ln r r r N N N � H U o L) .= 3 0 � 0 s= � c o E coo21 a� o Q OL L) U m c aC Q Q co Y C mom. > a� �� min Q ~l- C: O c0 L > ca C • c N E '( cn J D c .r C U, m c6 E OL Q ca _� a� c r_ vcm c Q C- L E o>� E _ E o oo��>mC o U) Q y O U O (6 U N t U U �_ s C O o— o V .0 U C: L)c) ocnDW� Via- 0-a_( 2 0 fn m U W T CL J U N U) O C m O 2t O (3) U C C m 1= w LL O T- F - LU F- W LU U) LU LU Y O LU U U) w _U W U) H Z Q J U) r� VJ Z O LL O w Q CO w O m X w w cn o 0 C 0 C o e N M NO Cl) p V a O M M O O R co U') H i O r o rn o 2 N a a1 r 00co N r 00 N ' 0o r 'p Q O M N W 0 V 7 �3 N R o 0 0 C 0 o N o R p M O O�j [-- W O Ea O M N N � O i Wp r Cl) M (0 p 2 a aN C o o LO co > o c a a R o 0 0 0 w a o R O W O O O a O O N Na) a) O r �U 7 N O O 0 N a r o co Q M N N � o d N O 0 O 7 0 i O O M CD N O 2 N O1 00 O I� r --W r LO Un rn> a N r N (.0 c6 rn Loc6 Lo LO 0 N M o o 0 0 O o= COo Tm co O o U a o r r� ti co M R C r In In (D N O O 2 al V O In co co 7 m I -o0 7 O O M > c0 O co m V N t` m r r mr-� M CD N 0 0 0 0 It 64 N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LU i H o R 00 _ co a1 M N � co co N I� O H O F- _ o p a D1 M co co (!� M N I� LO 0) N V W p 0 00 r N N 0 0 r N M O N r O N a i O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oo o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O LD J 0 N O V (` O O r M O O M c0 co (O 0o m N 4 LO co M O NLO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lo = r N O H WO r- 00 r (D O CO Cl) O V N W 00 O N (D (D M N O 00 (0 V N r (D Ln r a QcD N (0 NO 00 0w 0 OO (D (Of1 M 00 h ( M ( M 2 CO Z _m d U) N c `o c c m o o� J Q = ma c 'L) v U a� J O U D) � _ — O a U) � LL co C W C W O m O C o m 7 E� U H —— w w (n E M o Q (1) R j > .O .O (p C N O U �� (6 >_ (L N U 0 � � H `p W � U U` — a a , W W a V C 'Q O O — — O N O O -> O E O .O U U C C > C (� C C a` a 0 in U U 0 W w (n U w ul U m U w M LL O F- LU LU 2 LU LU U)1: 2f^ vJ Y CO '7^^ vJ U W U U) W w U) H Z J U) r� vJ Z O U LL O w C� G CO v W U) 0 m X w 07 N 01 . 03 N o 0 C 0 o C T ao m o c 0 c V Q r O N O 0 w N ~ 00 r O LO 2 � CED CDW LO Q O CN C N of 0 0 0 o m 00 coIt o O V a O co I S N O L Q O N O 2 a MN r p 7 87 > V V N O 05 O O R £ Q o C 0 0 N i C ^2 o R Ln m Ln 00 N V O V to O O ° R a .R 0 0 0 0 c 0 U') v ° 'C J O 3 N N r M N (co O M c 0 o m o? m o c a I- O CO o aN+N 0 ON C> N C a O1 00 N co I O O a, N co 0 a7 > Q N O 00 O Lo O W O O m N C L N w T o 0 0 0 a R o f0 m m U) I 41O N r p p y c a L Q CO � W L7 L O a 0 r M N N O M 00 W N M N f- N N C N N Q T i C f0 0 A 00 N M 00 N Nm 1 W p p G Q a .0 O N O r C N i i O 7 r O r V W m N 00 LO _ m JW O h m O O m m C) V 00 W Q O N (D (D M N O 00 1�t N (.0� Q O m 7 NI U7 1h (. Co. V N I- N r 1- a7 00 00 00 1 LO M 00 I� I M (O V V V m 2 C -7- o 0 0 Z _m — U c Q = d _> U yU) c J H o 0 o c° c° o .� J Q = m m c 0 LD m U aNi N O U 07 0)=- O a } L= N C w C w N' O C OL N 7 O .v U L H Q d m c c > C ro 0 O m > ° Q U U� H `o w U (� U° `o o w w8 uui `o ° o o u L) c .a 'E m 'c 0) .> > 'c m c 'c 0) '> c 'c a) E O 'c (Do ` m a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 w U 0 m U r_ 16 m 0 V O . (6 J > d E m Z N ♦r_ V C N c O Al n co LW r a H W i O a J O 2 W 0 a W Mir U- 0 M vJ W U_ W U) Z J CO VJ Z O U LL O W Q CO C J W U) O m X W or- C'1 o cc C? o ao C) ILa r` m o m j O (ND N O O N 2 0', a> > Q L!') N co 0) N to a Q m o V 0 lE ONO O r- N LO LO V W 0 O a p (o I- v r; N ;TN o (.0 O L a i O 004 0 co O CD N (�O O M V co 2 N a1 > O) co M K3 N 0 0 0L 0 0 0 N M co N O O N d N N M co M N O 0M C N V 00 (fl O 00 Cl) 2 V a a1 T V Cl) 00 000 > Q o 06 • N r N N LO 61) N Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c � cc� _ _ � N � � O p a oo co v v co w ly6 C N N (7 2 j M V O a7 Q 7 N M C, O E M O. O � Om o 0 0 d o f6 M Lo N co M -It LQ co O p a ri w ;I- V to co d dC N N ^ co co 2 a Im N LC) m C0 co 00 00 (0 C Q N V M N L6 N LO (A E N o 0 0 0 0 0 c O t 0 LO d (O N O V V M N T N 4 a C d7 Co N LO 00 2 i Ve WO r CO CO O M M O V N O 00 � O N M M M N O N (o V N Co Q= Q 00 CO c � 00 Co (fl L(') Cl) 00 M (o V V V Cl) 2 0 oz 0 LD o (10 O = d N c -o c J H m m o c c6 c°o .za J =_ _o U Cl) O V C 0) .c r0) — d o v U) o c Q N —— O U } (0 w w N u�i O o E O c—— w m c c F a a IL � (6 > > C C (676 5 N U U N> Q a U U �~ n w = U 3 J v O O w W `p y O ° O O m v m U ti S o > m m c m o m `m a a` rn cn .> U U cn � U w cn U� U U LU X LL L m E z r_ O d d m O V d E z E W I♦ Q Vi Q a M v u) O C B 0 m — O a O V -i> a a� E z m O 0 m z Y O v N C O LA m E O U 0, L C 49 L L U U @ '- N U U O w CLo U L C Q O Q U N O •L E O C a) CO E L C ~ U N o N L Y a� E o � z co I N LU w w O Q Q < w O LU >-o X LU LU > J O a m O v W J m � a a LU O Q a JO U F- z W 0 Q J J J N N N a O N0 Cl N � T- C) r O N ti qe M W n 2ww w LWoo 0 H w a �a`R W F� �N z O V 0 0 0 � o 0 LOoo O V cn t r- 0 O a� N N N J O O O LO cc +'' O O O RC14 C14 N N N i ti It It O r N Local Public Agency County Section Numb Villaae of Mount Prosaect I Cook Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number Gewalt Hamilton Associates PAYROLL RATES EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAI.c MAXIMUM PAYROLL RATE 86.00 ESCALATION FACTOR 1.51% CLASSIFICATION IDOT PAYROLL RATES ON FILE CALCULATED RATE Principal $80.14 $81.35 CE VI $81.00 $82.22 CE V $73.50 $74.61 CE IV $61.33 $62.25 CE III $47.53 $48.25 CE II $36.00 $36.54 CE I $34.84 $35.36 LS IV $55.63 $56.47 LS III $47.17 $47.88 LS II $39.00 $39.59 LS I $31.00 $31.47 ET V $69.58 $70.63 ET IV $43.56 $44.22 ET III $39.63 $40.23 ET II $33.06 $33.56 ET I $24.45 $24.82 Local Public Agency Count Village of Mount Prospect Cook Consultant / Subconsultant Name Gewalt Hamilton Associates DIRECT COSTS WORKSHEET List ALL direct costs required for this project. Those not listed on the form will not be eligible for rei EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS ITEM ALLOWABLE Lodging per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Actual Cost Up to state rate maximum Lodging Taxes and Fees per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Actual Cost Air Fare Coach rate, actual cost, requires minimum two weel' notice, with prior IDOT approval Vehicle Mileage per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Up to state rate maximum Vehicle Owned or Leased $32.50/half day (4 hours or less) or $65/full day Vehicle Rental Actual Cost (Up to $55/day) Tolls Actual Cost Parking Actual Cost Overtime Premium portion (Submit supporting documentation; Shift Differential Actual Cost (Based on firm's policy) Overnight Delivery/Postage/Courier Service Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (In-house) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (Outside) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Project Specific Insurance Actual Cost Monuments (Permanent) Actual Cost Photo Processing Actual Cost 2 -Way Radio (Survey or Phase III Only) Actual Cost Telephone Usage (Traffic System Monitoring Only) Actual Cost CADD Actual Cost (Max $15/hour) Web Site Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Advertisements Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Public Meeting Facility Rental Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Public Meeting Exhibits/Renderings & Equipment Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Recordina Fees Actual Cost 0 U O � m U) N LU w U w = H � O w W o I, - = O Z: w ODrn Y V LL N o w LLL O LL F- X X U J W w z CO — N M U d xU) LO CD �- � cmc W U O Q z W w _ m U w Y W 0 0� �rn ZJ o � Ln �l 0 LLJ � a a Q U � Z p O m Co tq LL N O o 'LU w LL O� L) vJ W r M N LO "Zt ti C%1 00 F- O r 0 U) U �a� F-o L) L) .= 3 � 0 o m p X W W Q Q � W m = O 0 C:Y LU •- > °' 06 OU co U 0U)U) m�� L E L z C m O z V cn 7 U i T CL v O J U N a� u Fm T. - LL LL O T- F- LU - HW W 2 H U) W W 2 Y O U W U U) W w U) z Q J U) z O LL O w Q TZ CO w O U H 00 X w 1�1111�111111111�1111111! m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII m X1111■Illllllll�llllllli �IIII■IIIIIIIII■IIIIIII� �IIII■I�IIIIIII■IIIIIII� �IIII 111111011■IIIIIII� �III1IIIIIIIII1IIIIIII�