Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.1 Motion to accept the proposal for the Arterial Bike Network Study for an amount not to exceed $349,348.M+awn �'xyt�lts�=e Item Cover Page Subject Motion to accept the proposal for the Arterial Bike Network Study for an amount not to exceed $349,348. Meeting October 17, 2023 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD Fiscal Impact (Y/N) Y Dollar Amount $349,348.00 Budget Source Statewide Planning & Research Grant and Capital Improvements Fund Category VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Type Action Item Information Discussion In 2011, the Village received a grant from the United States Department of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program to develop a bicycle plan. Technical expertise and guidance were provided by the Active Transportation Alliance and Sam Schwartz Engineering. The Village Board adopted the Mount Prospect Bicycle Plan (attached) by resolution on February 7, 2012. Subsequently, staff provided the Village Board with a Bicycle Plan status update at the February 11, 2020, Committee of the Whole meeting. In addition, continued work on bike plan implementation is a Top Priority Goal in the 2023/2024 Strategic Plan. The Bike Plan Essentially, the Mount Prospect Bicycle Plan is comprised of three (3) phases. Phase I includes installation of striped shared bike lanes, signed bike routes, and certain intersection improvements. This work leverages existing facilities, such as the road network, to connect primary destinations (i.e., parks, government offices, etc.). Generally, these improvements are cheaper to implement and require less regulatory coordination. Phases II & III include bike routes and other infrastructure improvements along arterial roads, uniformly under the jurisdiction of other agencies (such as the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and/or the Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways CCDOTH), that will provide connections to Phase I routes and adjacent communities. Attached is a map depicting bike route work completed to date. Also attached is a spreadsheet identifying the status of specific projects. In the eleven (11) years since adoption of the plan, substantial progress has been made. For example, almost all Phase 1 work has been completed and some significant Phase II projects have also been completed or are in the design process. The Problem The remaining projects pose significant challenges. Notably: • Most projects require work in arterial rights-of-way that the Village does not own or control. • All the projects introduce new bike facilities to high volume, high-speed roads. • All the projects are expensive. Attached for reference is a map depicting the locations of work to be done. The Arterial Bike Network Study To continue development of the bike plan, staff proposes an Arterial Bike Network Study that incorporates all the bike plan's remaining roadway corridors and examines each corridor individually. The scope of work for this study will garner input from roadway owners to determine what type of bike facility improvements they would allow, input from bike riders to determine what type of facilities they would utilize, and input from landowners adjacent to proposed bike improvements to understand property access, aesthetics, or security concerns they might harbor. In addition, the scope of work will also require consideration of wider regional bike plans, transportation and transit plans, vehicle and bike traffic data, and best engineering practices applied in the greater Chicago area. Most importantly, the study will conclude with a written report identifying preferred alternatives, implementation priorities, cost estimates, and preliminary designs for each corridor based on expert advice, best practices, and comprehensive stakeholder input. Grant Funding To facilitate this study, staff applied for and received a State Planning and Research Program grant in an amount not to exceed $280,000. Pursuant to the terms of the grant agreement, this amount cannot exceed 80% of the project cost. In other words, the Village must fund at least 20% of the project. Grant proceeds must be expended by December 2024. Qualifications Based Selection of a Consultant The State Planning and Research Program grant is federally funded. To participate in this program, grant recipients must utilize Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) criteria to hire a consultant. The QBS process differs slightly from the Request for Proposals (RFP) process normally utilized by staff to procure professional services. Notably, the QBS process does not permit simultaneous consideration of cost proposals. The IDOT Bureau of Local Roads (BLR) Design Manual is the primary guide for utilization of federal funds for roadway construction projects (including bike facilities) in the State of Illinois. In particular, the BLR stipulates: "In no case shall the LPA (Local Public Agency), prior to selecting a consultant for negotiations seek formal or informal submission of verbal, written, or sealed estimates of costs or proposals in terms of dollars, hours required, percentage of construction cost, or any other measure of compensation". In general, the QBS process requires owners to advertise the need for services, request qualifications statements or proposals from consultants, evaluate and rank consultants, select the most qualified firm, and negotiate a fee. Statements of Qualifications As required by the QBS process, staff solicited Statements of Qualifications from engineering consulting firms to provide services for the Arterial Bike Network Study. A notice was also posted on the DemandStar bidding website. Two (2) Statements of Qualifications were received. A copy of the Request for Statements of Qualifications is attached. The consulting firms' Statement of Qualifications were reviewed based on their understanding of Village goals and methodology proposed to complete the study. Each firm was rated (with a maximum score of 100 points) according to these specific categories: project understanding and technical approach, similar project experience, project team capabilities, IDOT prequalification status, and overall completeness of submittal. The rankings are: irm Approach & Similar Project IDOT Overall Total Understand i ng Project Team PrequalificationCompleteness Experience Capabilities Status of Submittal lax 30 25 25 10 10 100 oints iviltech 28.5 22.5 24 10 10 95 am 26.5 22.5 23 10 10 92 chwartz Discussion Staff conducted interviews with both consultants and determined Civiltech Engineering, Inc. is the preferred consultant for this project. The firm has put together a very strong project team with extensive experience in planning studies, feasibility studies, federal Phase I Engineering (preliminary) and Phase II Engineering (design) as well as Phase III (construction) of bike infrastructure. The firm also has ample experience working with IDOT, CCDOTH, railroads, numerous municipalities, biking associations, and the public. The breadth of this experience, along with an impressive menu of in-house resources, should produce a plan that is practical and implementable, leading directly to projects being constructed in the future. Civiltech meets IDOT prequalification requirements to perform this work. The firm has provided design engineering services for Village traffic signal projects and performed advisory work for the Transportation Safety Commission in the past. All their work has been acceptable. A copy of Civiltech's Statement of Qualifications is attached. Cost Proposal Staff asked Civiltech to provide a detailed cost proposal including a breakdown of hours by task. Village staff negotiated with Civiltech to assure the cost proposal has sufficient hours for each task, is reasonable in price and within the grant limits, meets the goals and schedule of the project, and is in the best interest of the Village. Staff supports the cost proposal submitted by Civiltech in the amount of $349,348 to provide planning and preliminary engineering services for the Arterial Bike Network Study. It is Staff's opinion that Civiltech is best qualified to perform the requisite work, has allotted appropriate work effort (2732 hours), and requested a reasonable, competitive fee ($349,348 / 2,732 hours _ $128/hour). A copy of the firm's cost proposal is attached. Civiltech anticipates that the project will take approximately 12 months to complete. The Village has been awarded up to $280,000 in federal planning funds for this study. This amount represents 80% of staff's estimated cost of $350,000 for the work. At a contract cost of $349,348, the federal share is $279,478.40 (80%) and the Village's share is $69,869.60 (20%). Alternatives 1. Accept proposal from Civiltech Engineering for Arterial Bike Network Study. 2. Action at the discretion of the Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal from Civiltech Engineering, Inc. to complete the Arterial Bike Network Study for an amount not to exceed $349,348.00. Attachments 1. Request for Proposals 2. Civiltech Technical Proposal 3. Civiltech Cost Proposal 4. IDOT Grant Agreement 5. Request for Statements of Qualifications 6. 2012 Bike Plan Status 7. Arterial Bike Network Study Location Map 8. Civiltech Exeprience Matrix 9. Combined Map - Reduced 10. Existing Bike Network Map- Reduced MAYOR Paul Wm. Hoefert TRUSTEES Vincent J. Dante Agostino Filippone Terri Gens William A. Grossi John Matuszak Colleen E. Saccotelli DATE: June 9, 2023 VILLAGE MANAGER Michael J. Cassady Mount Prospect DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Sean Dorsey Phone: 847/870-5640 Fax: 847/253-9377 www.mountprospect.org Village of Mount Prospect Public Works 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Request for Statement of Qualifications FROM: Matthew Lawrie, P.E. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department RE: Request for Statement of Qualifications Arterial Bike Network Study The Village of Mount Prospect seeks Statement of Qualifications from engineering firms for engineering and planning services to develop an Arterial Bike Network Study for the Village. Attached to this memo are: 1. A list of materials and information that should be included with your Statement of Qualifications (Exhibit A). 2. A general definition of the scope of work and requirements for your submittal (Exhibit B). 3. The evaluation process and tentative schedule (Exhibit C). 4. A list of key corridors, destinations, and connections (Exhibit D). 5. An aerial map identifying key corridors to be evaluated (Exhibit E). 6. Village Bicycle Plan (attached separately). Your Statement of Qualifications should be emailed to the following address and received no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 30, 2023. Mr. Jason Leib Deputy Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect ileib@mountprospect.org wp�mii Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 2 Exhibit A Requirements for Statement of Qualifications Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Arterial Bike Network Study Your Statement of Qualifications should include the following information: 1. Name, address and brief history of firm. 2. Organizational chart and resumes of key personnel to be assigned to this project. 3. Related experience during the last five (5) years. For example: a. Engineering and planning services for bicycle improvements resulting in actionable plans for bike improvements on State, County, and local roads. b. Phase I and Phase II Engineering services for bike improvements. c. Experience working with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways (CCDoTH), Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), Canadian National Railroad (CN), Commonwealth Edison (ComEd) and private property owners on pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure projects. d. Experience working with multiple interest groups including municipalities, state agencies, residents and businesses. Emphasis will be placed on effective communication tools and the ability to build consensus. 4. Description of process to accomplish the required tasks of the project. This should include: a. An understanding of the project. b. Objectives to be met as part of the project. c. Your approach to completing the project. d. A project schedule. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 3 Exhibit B General Scope of Work Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Arterial Bike Network Study A strategic goal of the Village of Mount Prospect is to implement a complete bike network that provides the community a viable and safe alternative mode of transportation. The Village Bicycle Study, adopted in 2012, identifies three infrastructure phases. Phase I includes on -street bike routes along low volume, residential streets that connect to key destinations such as parks, schools, shopping, restaurants, and adjacent communities. Phases 11 & III includes bike routes along arterial roads, often under thejurisdiction of other agencies, that will provide connections to Phase I routes and adjacent communities. Since 2012, the Village has installed 28 miles of on -street bike routes completing Phase I of the Bike Plan. This new study will develop a strategy to construct bike facilities along arterial and other high traffic streets in the Village, completing the planning for Phases 11 and III of the Bike Plan. It will also consider constructing paths along railroad, utility, park district and private property as necessary to make needed connections to create a holistic network for the Village. The study will serve as a guide to complete future federal Phase I & Phase 11 Engineering and/or locally funded construction projects. The Village has received a Statewide Planning & Research Program grant to supplement local funds to complete the Arterial Bike Network Study. Exhibit D lists the routes to be studied along with local destinations and connections. Exhibit E is a map of existing and planned bike routes including those to be examined as part of this study (purple routes). At a minimum, the following tasks are to be included in the scope of services. Additional tasks, at the consultant's recommendation, will be considered by the Village. 1. Complete site survey and data collection to establish existing conditions on all routes to be examined in the study. Boundary survey is not required but determining right-of-way lines by review of record drawings and site surveys will be necessary. Topographical survey will not be required for this project. 2. Communicate with surrounding municipalities, IDOT and Cook County to determine future plans for their own bike facilities 3. Communicate with key stakeholders to determine feasibility of constructing bike routes within their right-of-way or property including IDOT, Cook County, Union Pacific Railroad, Canadian National Railroad, ComEd and park districts. 4. Develop a webpage to be hosted on the Village website for public outreach. 5. Conduct a public survey to determine priorities of residents for locations and types of bike facilities in the Village. Include an online GIS application for resident input. 6. Hold a public meeting to hear feedback from the community on bike infrastructure priorities. 7. Develop an alternatives analysis report considering various on -street and off-street alignments for each of the routes. Consider reconfiguration changes such as road diets, road widening, and intersection improvements as appropriate to enhance bike safety and eliminate biking barriers. Determine the preferred design for each of the routes. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 4 8. Create a draft study that includes graphical and tabular exhibits that clearly communicate the recommendations to all stakeholders and the public. This should include cross-sections and aerial exhibits that detail existing and proposed infrastructure. 9. Develop a matrix that prioritizes projects based on various factors determined by the consultant. 10. Develop construction cost estimates for each of the routes. 11. Identify grant opportunities to construct the bike network. 12. Present the pre -final study to the Transportation Safety Commission. 13. Complete a final study based on feedback from Village staff, Transportation Safety Commission, and the public. 14. Present the final study to the Village Board of Trustees. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 5 Exhibit C Evaluation Process Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Arterial Bike Network Study Your letter and Statement of Qualifications should be emailed to the following address and received no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, June 30, 2023 to the attention of: Mr. Jason Leib Deputy Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect jleib(d)mountprospect.org The Statement of Qualifications will be evaluated based on the following factors: • Project Understanding & Technical Approach • Similar Project Experience • Project Team Capabilities • IDOT Prequalification Status • Overall Completeness of Submittal The Village will conduct interviews with the shortlist firms. Those selected for an interview will be contacted by the Village to arrange a date/time to meet at the Mount Prospect Public Works Department, 1700 W. Central Road, or via GoToMeeting. The Village of Mount Prospect appreciates your interest in this project. Any request for information or questions regarding this Request for Statement of Qualifications can be directed to Matthew Lawrie, Village Engineer, by phone at 847-870-5640 or email at mlawrie(cDmountprospect.org. Tentative Schedule Submit Statement of Qualifications r June 30, 2023 Select consultants for interview July 21, 2023 Select consultant and negotiate contract August 4, 2023 Award contract to consultant September 5, 2023 Kick-off meeting with Village September 13, 2023 Public Meeting & Comment Period December 2023 Alternatives Analysis Report Complete February 2024 Draft Study Complete April 2024 Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 6 Presentation to Transportation Safety Commission May 2024 Final Study Complete June 2024 Presentation to Village Board of Trustees July 2024 Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 7 Exhibit D List of Corridors, Destinations & Connections Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Arterial Bike Network Study Below is a list of items to be examined/considered as part of the study. It may not be all-inclusive and is subject to change with consultant's input at the Village's discretion. Bike facilities along arterial roads under IDOT jurisdiction: a. Rand Road (US 12) b. Northwest Highway (US 14) c. Des Plaines River Road (US 45) d. Golf Road (IL 58) e. Elmhurst Road (IL 83) f. Central Road g. Busse Road h. Kensington Road i. Oakton Street Bike facilities along arterial roads under Cook County jurisdiction: a. Camp McDonald Road (A58) b. Euclid Avenue (A59) c. Dempster Street (A64) d. Mount Prospect Road (W74) Bike facilities along arterial roads under Village jurisdiction: a. Wolf Road b. Central Road Bike facilities along railroad corridors (may overlap road corridors): a. Union Pacific Railroad (parallel to Northwest Highway) b. Canadian National Railroad (roughly parallel to Wolf Road) Bike facilities along utility corridors (may overlap road corridors): a. ComEd ROW (adjacent to CN Railroad) b. ComEd ROW on south side of town (Kopp Park) Major destinations within the Village to be taken into consideration: a. Downtown Mount Prospect b. Kensington Business Park c. Randhurst Village d. Melas Park e. Metra Stations Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 8 Connections outside Mount Prospect to be taken into consideration: a. Downtown Des Plaines Downtown Arlington Heights Des Plaines River Trail Prospect Heights Bike Path Busse Woods f. Elk Grove Village Employment Centers Northwest Municipal Conference bike corridors to be taken into consideration: a. Northwest Highway Bikeway b. Barrington -Wilmette Bikeway (Central Road) c. Evanston -Elgin Bikeway (Golf Road) d. Elk Grove -Evanston Bikeway (Com Ed ROW) EXHIBIT E Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Date June 30, 2023 To Mr. Jason Leib Deputy Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect 1700 W. Central Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 jleib@mountprospect.org Re Request for Statement of Qualifications Arterial Bike Network Study www.civiltechinc.com Itasca 630.773.3900 r Chicago 312.726.5910 Itasca Two Pierce Place, Suite 1400 Itasca, IL 60143 Chicago 30 N LaSalle Street, Suite 3220 Chicago, IL 60602 Dear Mr. Leib: The Civiltech team is ready to deliver for the Village of Mount Prospect. Our proposed staff specializes in the development, funding, and implementation o bicycle and pedestrian transportation infrastructure. Our staff is excited to bring their experience, creativity, and all of the necessary resources to make Mount Prospect's Arterial Bike Network Study a win. Civiltech Engineering, Inc. works predominately in northeastern Illinois, with offices in downtown Chicago and suburban Itasca. We specialize in all facets of transportation, from planning through the preliminary and pre -final design phases, including construction inspection services. The staff members assigned to this project are passionate about complete streets improvements, community engagement, and bring strong IDOT, Cook County, Commonwealth Edison, and railroad experience to the table. The Civiltech team offers the following: II services provided under one umbrella. Planning, preliminary and final design engineering, traffic engineering, engagement, and graphic/rendering preparation are all in-house services. Additionally, we thrive in the space that exists between planning and engineering. Why is this important? At Civiltech, we strongly believe in sharing knowledge across all of our departments to produce projects that are visionary yet constructible. Designers that can quickly and efficiently create bicycle facility plans. Creating accurate plans without topographic survey is an art, and we have mastered this process. For the past six years Civiltech has anchored the City of Chicago's Arterial Resurfacing program that plans, designs, and implements 40 miles of roadway improvements each year. These arterial improvements have aggressive schedules and include complete streets improvements which include more than a dozen miles of on -street bike lanes per year. Staff that is accustomed to working hand-in-hand with I DOT and Cook County. These experiences vary in scope and scale from large scale projects like North DuSable Lake Shore Drive and Lake Cook Road to smaller corridor and intersection traffic studies. We have solid relationships with the traffic and geometric reviewers from both agencies, where we understand their concerns and can anticipate their preferences. Community engagement and graphical resources that are second to none. We see it as our mission to gather the maximum amount of community input to create the strongest plan recommendations. Implementation strategies that are centered on funding opportunities. We bring proven grant writing experience and have an awareness of all of the current funding opportunities. Our team members provide all of the transportation - related grant writing services for the City of Chicago, and have secured more the a quarter -billion dollars of funding for our clients over the past ten years. Recent wins have included bicycle projects such as Chicago's Englewood Line Trail and Evanston's Church Street pedestrian and bicycle improvements project. On behalf of our team, we look forward to the opportunity of working with your group. Please reach out to me with any questions or the need for additional information. Veer�ry truly yours, Michael J. Folkening, P.E., PTOE Director of Urban Design & Traffic mfolkening@civiltechinc.com 1312.656.0687 CIVILTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Statement Of QWfifi(AWWS Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect ..... ... .... SECTION 1 (:211 �� �7:1 I C 1-111' 4� ". °MSM . . .. . .............. . ere, Statenneint of Quafificafloins Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect FIRM HISTORY CiviRech Engineerhrig, linc. is an engineering finim with its piriirnairy fbcu,,ss oin Transportation Plannihirig aind Engineeirihirig. We apply a Cornplete Streets desigin approach to every project, ensuring that it balances all users of the roadway, including pedestrians, Ibicyclllsts, transit riders, and drivers. We understand the power of cornbiining 1p�lainning, Ilaauadscape architecture and engineering to develop as sense of cornmunity identity and investment in roadway proiects. We eingage the corrimuinity to improve the sidewalks, paths and roads on which people live, work and 1pllay. Civiltech's municipal client list includes over 85 villages and cities in the Chicago and Northern Illinois region, the Illinois Tollway, Illinois Department of Transportation, Chicago Department of Transportation, multiple county and township DOTS, additional public agencies, as well as private sector clients. Civiltech realizes that success lies in the individual service and attention we provide to our clients. We are committed to providing top quality consulting engineering services. Through the years, we have earned a reputation for professional excellence and integrity. . ........... ........... . . ......... ........... . . .......... ............................. ,������ AAEF" ,/,iii Years of Service Projects& Counting P/ Responsive service. Local knowledge. E N Dedicated 22011 %% Satisfied AAEF" Clients Responsive service. Local knowledge. E N Dedicated 22011 %% Employees Licensed P.E.'s Strong Reputation We have developed a rapport with our municipal clients such that we have a clear understanding of the communications necessary with not only your staff but also the residents and business owners involved in any given project. Responsiveness Civiltech is responsive to our client's needs. We meet or exceed the client's schedule and requirements, and are always readily available if a problem arises in design or during construction. We stand behind our work. Quality Work We provide a quality product with a qualified and friendly staff. Our goal is to achieve 100% client satisfaction. We continually keep abreast of current and/or changing federal and state funding programs that may be of financial benefit to the community. Knowledge Sharing Civiltech performs engineering services for many other municipalities, and therefore can share our experiences and information on techniques, new products or innovations that other communities are using that might be of benefit in your community. Creative Solutions Civiltech's staff has an enthusiasm for practical, yet creative, design and engineering solutions. , Uin impartment of, Tray 2300 South Dirksen Parkway I SpNngfieldl, Illinois 1627614 June 15, 2023 Subject: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Consultant Unit Prequalification File Jonathan Vana CIVILTECH ENGINEERING, INC. Two Pierce Place Suite 1400 Itasca, IL 60143 Dear Jonathan Vana, We have completed our review of your "Statement of Experience and Financial Condition" (SEFC) which you submitted for the fiscal year ending Dec 31, 2021. Your firm's total annual transportation fee capacity will be $44,000,000. Your firm's payroll burden and fringe expense rate and general and administrative expense rate totaling 120.55% are approved on a provisional basis. The rate used in agreement negotiations may be verified by our Bureau of Investigations and Compliance in a pre -award audit. Pursuant to 23 CFR 172.11(d), we are providing notification that we will post your company's indirect cost rate to the Federal Highway Administration's Audit Exchange where it may be viewed by auditors from other State Highway Agencies. Your firm is required to submit an amended SEFC through the Engineering Prequalification & Agreement System (EPAS) to this office to show any additions or deletions of your licensed professional staff or any other key personnel that would affect your firm's prequalification in a particular category. Changes must be submitted within 15 calendar days of the change and be submitted through the Engineering Prequalification and Agreement System (EPAS). Your firm is prequalified until December 31, 2022. You will be given an additional six months from this date to submit the applicable portions of the "Statement of Experience and Financial Condition" (SEFC) to remain prequalified. Sincerely, Jack Elston, P.E. Bureau Chief Bureau of Design and Environment SEFC PREQUALIFICATIONS FOR CIVILTECH ENGINEERING, INC. CATEGORY STATUS Hydraulic Reports - Waterways: Complex X Special Studies - Feasibility X Location Design Studies - Rehabilitation X Location Design Studies - New Construction/Major Reconstruction X Highways - Freeways X Special Studies - Safety X Location Design Studies - Reconstruction/Major Rehabilitation X Special Services - Public Involvement X Highways - Roads and Streets X Hydraulic Reports - Pump Stations X Special Studies - Traffic Studies X Special Services - Landscape Architecture X Environmental Reports - Environmental Impact Statement X Structures - Highway: Typical X Special Studies- Location Drainage X Special Plans - Lighting: Typical X Environmental Reports - Environmental Assessment X Special Plans - Traffic Signals X Special Services - Construction Inspection X Hydraulic Reports - Waterways: Typical X Structures - Highway: Advanced Typical X Structures - Highway: Simple X X PREQUALIFIED A NOT PREQUALIFIED, REVIEW THE COMMENTS UNDER CATEGORY VIEW FOR DETAILS IN EPAS. S PREQUALIFIED, BUT WILL NOT ACCEPT STATEMENTS OF INTEREST Statement Of QWfifi(AWWS Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect SECTION 2 II : I 11, 1IL.......N li tc, ii IV �(j II......... ..............ere, , , () � �� DP[I !!!, ..... ... .... S—, ii"I (::;W1 '�, �A �. () I1 C II, 1� II ii.d 3d,'ie(JLde jec,,J 1) S _ ons Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect KEY PERSONNEL Project Manager & Phase I Lead QC/QA Jim Tibble, P.E. Mike Folkening, P.E., PTOE Environmental Lead Planning Lead & Railroad Senior Designer - Traffic Lead Jen Hyman, P.E. - Experience Amanda Kleinwachter, P.E. - Steve Pautsch, P.E., PTOE Jacque Henrikson, AICP Environmental QC/QA - Community Engagement Designer - Specialist Senior Traffic Engineer o Mary Young, P.E., PTOE Giana Civito, P.E. - Brian DeSalle, P.E., PTOE* Lissa Sweeney, AICP, LEED AP - - Railroad Experience Planners Traffic Engineer Environmental Support Josie Willman r �TF nmol Shrivastava, P.E., PTOE, RSP* Maddie Johnson, P.E. Edith Portales Landscape Architect *Indicates resume not included but available Digital Rendering Team Lead upon request. Phil Hutchinson, PLA, LEED AP Landscape Designer Digital Rendering John Magill* Digital Rendering Jerry Chen* Phase II Lead ComEd & Railroad Experience Kristin Kalitowski, P.E. Jim Tibble, P.E. Project Manager Expertise Jim first joined Civiltech as a student at the University of Dayton through the — cooperative education program. Since graduating with a Bachelors of Civil and Intersection Design Studies Environmental Engineering in May 2011, Jim has been involved with Phase I projects Roadway and Highway Design involving traffic studies, geometric and intersection design, pedestrian and bicycle Traffic Signal and Signal System Design facility design, traffic signal design, and public involvement. Environmental Assessment and Representative r ojects Design Studies Coordination and Public Involvement Residential and Industrial Streets Capacity Analysis City Construction Engineering, Chicago Aldermanic Menu Program; Chicago Section 4(f) Statement Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Traffic Signal and Signal System e i n Educationn B.S. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2011 Various Traffic Signal Projects, Region 1; Illinois Department of Transportation, University of Dayton Divison of Highways Professional Registrations Wilson Street Interconnect; City of Batavia; $2.6 million Professional Engineer -Illinois; 062-66559 Lake Cook Road Phase II; Village of Buffalo Grove; $43.5 million Elgin O'Hare Western Access (EOWA) IL -390 — Lively Boulevard to Supreme Drive; Illinois Tollway, $88.9 million Environmental Assessment and Design Studies Project Development Report, Tri -Trail Connector; Village of Villa Park; $710,000 Project Development Report, Argonne Drive Phase I Study; City of North Chicago; $16.2 million Project Development Report, Church Road and Main STreet Resurfacing; Village of Bensenville; $890,000 Project Development Report, IL Route 83 Bike Path Phase I Study; Village of Bensenville; $1.4 million Project Development Report, Millennium Trail - Ravens Glen Forest Preserve; Lake County Forest Preserve District; $4.3 million Project Development Report, 111 th Street - Cottage Grove Avenue to Doty Avenue; Chicago Department of Transportation; $2.5 million Project Development Report, Beverly Road Bicycle Facility and Resurfacing; Village of Hoffman Estates; $2.2 million Project Development Report, U.S. Route 41 (Skokie Boulevard) and Lake Avenue Intersection Improvement; Village of Wilmette Project Development Report, Main Street Improvements; Village of Lombard; $1.4 million Project Development Report, Manhattan-Monee Road Phase I Study; Will County Division of Transportation Project Development Report, 248th Avenue Phase I Study; City of Naperville Project Development Report, Atkinson Road at Washington Street Intersection Improvements; Village of Grayslake; $1.7 million Jim Tibble, P.E. Project Manager .> ' •s • yJ Environmental Assessment and Design Studies (Continued) Project Development Report, Lively Boulevard Phase I Study; Village of Elk Grove Village, $3.2 million Project Development Report, Church Road STP Improvements; Village of Bensenville, $1.7 million Project Development Report, Middlefork Savanna Trail Connection; Lake County Forest Preserve District, $2.0 million Project Development Report, 14th Street Phase I Study; Lake County Division of Transportation, $12.3 million Project Development Report, Lakeview Parkway; Village of Vernon Hills Project Development Report, Fremont Center Road Phase I Study; Lake County Division of Transportation Project Development Report, Essington Road, U.S. Route 52 to Black Road; City of Joliet; $3.6 million d�!il Mike Folkening, P.E., PTOE h Director of Urban Design & Traffic Expertise Mike has been providing civil, transportation, and urban design consulting services - since 1995. His experience includes the design of roadways, streetscapes, on -street Roadway and Highway Design bicycle facilities, multi -use paths and trails, and other recreational facilities. Mike Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction specializes in transportation projects within highly urbanized areas with high level Drainage Design pedestrian, bicycle, and transit accommodations. He is passionate about providing a Complete Streets approach to ensure the safety of all modes of transportation Preparation of Contract Plans, while respecting vehicular mobility and promoting commercial activity. Mike leads Specifications and Estimates the Urban Design &Traffic department which also includes Civiltech's transportation Site Design Engineering planning and landscape architecture services. Bikeway and Pedestrian Facility Design F Design Representative Education Bikeway and Pedestrian Facility Design B.S Civil Engineering, 1995 Valparaiso University Central Business District Streetscape and Utility Improvements; Village of Glen Ellyn; $20.0 million Professional Registrations Vision Zero: Year One High Crash Corridor Improvements; Chicago Department of Professional Engineer - Illinois; 062-054315 Transportation, Division of Engineering Professional Engineer -Wisconsin; 47618-6 Professional Traffic Operations Engineer- Northcenter Town Square; Chicago Department of Transportation; $1.0 million National Certification; 2483 Chicago Streets for Cycling Phase IV, Project 3 - Phase I and II; Chicago Department Certifications of Transportation, Division of Project Development; $3.0 million Think Bike Chicago Workshop - Dutch Cycling Lincoln Village Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge - Phase I and II; Chicago Department Embassy, September 2013 of Transportation, Division of Project Development; $2.0 million Sustainable Streets for Chicago, June 2009 Stony Island Avenue Cycle Track, 77th Street to 67th Street - Phase I and II; Chicago Designing Streets for Pedestrian Safety, Department of Transportation, November 2007 Division of Project Development; $2.5 million Context Sensitive Solutions for Local Agencies, October 2006 Des Plaines River Trail Improvements — Phase I and II; City of Des Plaines; $900,000 Professional Organizations Bicycle Planning American Society of Civil Engineers Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan; City of St. Charles Lambda Alpha International -Ely Chapter Libertyville Village Bicycle Plan; Village of Libertyville Master Bike & Active Transportation Plan; Village of Wilmette Elmhurst Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update; City of Elmhurst Network -wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study; Village of Sauk Village Major Roadway and Arterial Design Jackson Park Improvements/Obama Presidential Center; Chicago Department of Transportation North DuSable Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering North DuSable Lake Shore Drive over LaSalle Drive Bridge Rehabilitation; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering; $3.1 million LaSalle Drive Reconfiguration, Clark Street to LSD - Phase I and II; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering; $10.5 million Mike Folkening, P.E., PTOE Director of Urban Design & Traffic • rTalor"TITMIM Major Roadway and Arterial Design (continued) 63rd Street Improvement, Western Avenue to Wallace Street — Phase I and II; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering; $28.9 million 126th Place and Torrence Avenue Improvement— Phase I and II; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering; $17.7 million Stony Island Avenue Improvement at 79th Street/South Chicago Avenue — Phase I and II; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering; $1.9 million Arterial and Collector Streets Oak Park Avenue, Irving Park Road to Forest Preserve Drive; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering; $3.6 million Fullerton Avenue, Ashland Avenue to Racine Avenue— Phase I and II; Chicago Department of Transportation, Streetscape and Sustainable Design Program; $6.0 million Chicago West Side Safe Routes to School Enhancements; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development; $520,000 Cermak Road Vertical Clearance Improvement at Kenton Avenue — Phase I; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Deerfield Road, Wilmot Road to Chestnut Avenue - Phase II; Village of Deerfield; $3.0 million Roadway and Roadside Enhancements North Avenue Medians, Harlem Avenue to Austin Avenue and Kedzie Avenue to Western Avenue; Chicago Department of Transportation - Division of Engineering Martin Luther King Drive, 35th Street to 51 st Street; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering 79th Street Median Planters and Kedzie Triangle Improvement; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering; $3.3 million Residential and Industrial Streets City Construction Engineering, Chicago Aldermanic Menu Program; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering WPA, North Area Project 6; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Special Assessment #213 — West Road, Roadway and Infrastructure; Village of Lombard; $3.5 million 31 st Street Bicycle/Pedestrian Path — Phase I and II; Village of Oak Brook, $1.1 million Traffic Signals Cermak Road Interconnect, Ashland Avenue to Martin Luther King Drive; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Streeterville Interconnect; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Traffic Engineering and Impact Studies Chicago Cubs Post -Game Signal Timing Study; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development Expertise Jacque has a decade of experience in transportation planning and policy projects - around the Chicago region. She has assisted communities in engaging the public and Transportation Planning key stakeholders, formulating their goals and visions for transportation, formalizing Bicycle Studies these ideas with policy changes and design guidelines, and beginning the steps Pedestrian Studies of implementation through infrastructure design and programming. She has also Freight Studies assisted communities in prioritizing capital improvements, identifying funding opportunities and grant writing. Jacque has provided Transportation Planning and Complete Streets Policy Writing Project Management on studies across all modes, including pedestrian, bicycle, trails, Crash Analysis transit and freight. Coordination and Public Involvement Representative Projects Geographic Information Systems Technical Writing Transportation Planning Grant Writing Cicero Avenue Corridor Study; Chicago Department of Transportation and Data Science Department of Planning and Development Cook County Transit Plan; Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Education (sub -consultant to Nelson Nygaard) Master of Urban Planning & Policy, 2014 DuPage Trail Plan; (sub -consultant to Epstein) University of Illinois at Chicago North DuSable Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of BA Creative Writing 2009 Transportation, Division of Engineering Knox College Professional Registrations Crash Analysis American Institute of Certified Planners Multimodal Crash Study; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Certifications Project Development Data Science General Assembly 2018 Bicycle Planning Professional Organizations Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan; City of St. Charles American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Libertyville Village Bicycle Plan; Village of Libertyville Women in Planning and Development, Master Bike & Active Transportation Plan; Village of Wilmette Former Programs Chair American Planning Association, Member Elmhurst Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update; City of Elmhurst Network -wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study; Village of Sauk Village Freight Planning South Cook County Truck Routing & Communities Study; Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Moving Will County - (CMAP Freight Studies: Will County Truck Routing and Communities Study and Will County Freight Transportation and Land Use Strategy); Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning As a transportation planner at Active Transportation Alliance, Jacque worked on the following projects: Network -wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Network -wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning; Village of Brookfield I Project Manager and Planning Lead Jacque Henrikson, AICP Project Manager • �, Network -wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning (Continued) Calumet Park Active Transportation Plan; Village of Calumet Park I Project Manager and Planning Lead Melrose Park Active Transportation Plan; Village of Melrose Park I Planning Lead Lynwood Active Transportation Plan; Village of Lynwood I Technical Planner Bensenville Active Transportation Plan; Village of Bensenville I Technical Planner Lombard Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan; Village of Lombard, Alta Planning & Design I Community Engagement and Existing Conditions Planner Wayne Township Bike Plan; Wayne Township I Assistant Technical Planner Studies, Corridors and Site Access Planning Chicago River Trail Action Plan; Richard H. Driehaus Foundation; Chicago I Assistant Technical and Community Engagement Planner Little Village Paseo Feasibility Study; Chicago Department of Transportation I Technical Planner for proposed trail crossing improvements Accessibility Action Plan for Six Corners Commercial District; Six Corners Association, Chicago I Technical Planner Big Marsh Access Action Plan; Friends of Big Marsh, Chicago I Assistant Community Engagement and Existing Conditions Planner Grant Elementary School Access Action Plan; Village of South Chicago Heights I Project Manager and Planning Lead Kings Road Corridor Study; Village of Steger I Project Manager and Planning Lead Policy and Design Standards Memphis Complete Streets Project Delivery Manual; City of Memphis, TN Played a key role in developing a cohesive set of right-of-way allocations for the City of Memphis, Tennessee through analyzing local land use and development code. Created fifty cross-sections to illustrate these recommendations in the manual and at a workshop for City officials. Wrote the chapter on how to apply the cross sections to various roadway and land use typologies. Complete Streets Policy Development and Implementation for Suburban Cook County Municipalities: Calumet Park, Midlothian, Steger, South Chicago Heights and Calumet City; Partnerships to Improve Community Health, Cook County Department of Public Health • Provided technical assistance to communities in formulating and implementing strong policy language with teeth that could withstand municipal staffing and leadership changes • Temporary Traffic Calming: assisted in designing, preparing, and building six temporary traffic calming pop-up events. Engaged community members on the day of the events through surveys, discussions, and filmed interviews with elected officials and residents. Lissa Sweeney, AICP, LEED AP Project Manager J, Expertise Lissa Sweeney's talent lies in bringing multiple stakeholders to the table, guiding - them through complex issues and advocating for creative solutions and action. She is Transportation Planning passionate about improving the built environment and has managed transportation, Stakeholder Coordination and stormwater management and sustainability projects. As a certified planner (AICP), Public Involvement Lissa takes a holistic approach to projects. Her experience in the not-for-profit, private Geographic Information Systems and public sectors positions her to implement innovative and custom approaches for Complete Streets each client. In addition to assisting clients in working towards LEED certification, Lissa regularly piloted new sustainability programs and certifications including GRESB, Grant Writing BOMA 360, and TOBY Awards. Education RepresentativeProjects Master of Urban Planning & Policy, 2013 Transportation Planning and Community Engagement University of Illinois at Chicago B.A. Psychology & Environmental Sciences, 2009 Cook County Transit Study; Cook County Department of Transportation University of Michigan and Highways Professional Registrations South Cook County Truck Routing & Communities Study; Chicago Metropolitan American Institute of Certified Planners; 31796 Agency for Planning LEED Accredited Professional; North DuSable Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of 10780748-AP-O+M Transportation, Division of Engineering Professional Organizations Network -wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning U.S. Green Building Council, Member American Planning Association, Member Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study; Village of Sauk Village Women's Transportation Seminar (WTS), Transportation YOU Co -Chair At a previous place of employment, Lissa worked on the following projects: Stormwater Master Planning Program; Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Randolph Street Corridor Improvement Study; Chicago Department of Transportation Pulaski Road Phase I Study; Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Plainfield Road Phase I Study; Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Busse Road Phase I Study; Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Howard Street Corridor Improvement; City of Evanston, Illinois Brown Line Capacity Vision Study; Chicago Transit Authority South Halsted Bus Corridor Enhancement Project; Chicago Transit Authority and Pace Fulton Market Streetscape Section 2; Chicago Department of Transportation Burnham Multimodal Connector Phase I Study; Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Illinois International Port District Master Plan; Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Josie Willman Transportation Planner l Expertise Josie is a member of our planning team. She brings a marketing analytics background - to transportation planning. She has extensive experience conducting research and Transportation Planning developing strategies to encourage walking and bicycling as viable commute options Transit to universities. She has experience with multimodal planning, including pedestrian, Statistical Analysis bicycle, freight, and transit design. She also provides data analytics, GIS, and Geographic Information Systems infographic support to planning and engineering projects at Civiltech. Technical Writing Representative Projects Data Science Transportation Planning Data Visualization Crash Analysis Cicero Avenue Corridor Study; Chicago Department of Transportation and Department of Planning and Development North DuSable Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of Education Transportation, Division of Engineering Master of Urban Planning, 2019 University of Wisonsin - Milwaukee Cook County Transit Plan; Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways BS Business Administration, 2015 (sub -consultant to Nelson Nygaard) The Ohio State University Crash nalsis Technical Skills Multimodal Crash Study; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Adobe InDesign, Illustrator, and Photoshop Development ESRI ArcMap and ArcPro QGIS Bicycle Planning Remix Transit Scheduling Tool Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan; City of St. Charles Python Libertyville Village Bicycle Plan; Village of Libertyville SPSS Statistics Elmhurst Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update; City of Elmhurst Published Articles "Move Closer and Get Active: How to Make Network -wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Urban University Commutes more Satisfying" Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study; Village of Sauk Village Josie Willman and Robert J Schneider Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Freight Plannin Behavior, Volume 60,462-473, 2019. (haps: Iasi.c,rg�lo.1o16�iarf:2a111_:oa1.) CMAP Freight Studies: Will County Truck Routing and Communities Study and "Linking Police and EMS Records: An Approach Will County Freight Transportation and Land Use Strategy; Chicago Metropolitan to Strengthen Bicyclist Injury Reporting" Agency for Planning Josie Willman, Robert J Schneider, Stephen Hargarten South Cook County Truck Routing & Communities Study; Chicago Metropolitan Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Agency for Planning Transportation Research Board, 2023. (httos//doi.org710.] 1.7.7/9.3.6.1.19.8.1221151073) As a Schedule and Planning Intern with the Milwaukee County Transit System, Josie provided the following services: • Created MCTS's first bus stop design guide and service guidelines • Assisted with the System Redesign project via public outreach efforts and data analysis • Helped with the analysis of service changes (e.g. data analysis, preparation of maps/memos) Edith Portales Planner I Expertise Edith Portal es joined the CiviltechTransportation Planning team in September 2022 - after completing her Master of Urban Planning and Policy at the University of Illinois Transportation Planning in Chicago. She brings a specialization in economic development and grant analysis. Public Involvement Edith has expertise in data and policy development and analysis. She has also been Transit recognized for her research on policy and design interventions to fight violence against women and feminine -presenting people on public transit. Education Representative Projects Master of Urban Planning and Policy, 2021 University of Illinois at Chicago Transportation Planning B.A. Public Policy/Economics, 2018 North DuSable Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of University of Chicago Transportation, Division of Engineering C*NECT Program; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Safe Routes to Transit Phase I Study; City of Milwaukee, Department of Public Works Bicycle Planning Libertyville Village Bicycle Plan; Village of Libertyville Network -wide i t and PedestrianPlanning Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study; Village of Sauk Village Amanda Kleinwachter, P.E.Y��„� Project Manager Expertise Amanda has been with Civiltech Engineering since May of 2015 and currently serves — as a Project Manager on Phase I study and Phase II design engineering projects for Urban Bike and Pedestrian Facility Design urban roadways and corridors. Amanda specializes in bike and pedestrian facility Transit Access Design design and transit access. She brings experience as a traffic/transportation engineer and has worked on traffic impact studies, transportation planning projects such as Roadway Design corridor studies and comprehensive plans, capacity analysis, and Phase I studies. Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Amanda serves as primary client contact on many significant projects, leads Traffic Engineering and Impact Studies stakeholder coordination efforts, and is involved in many presentations at public Capacity Analysis hearings and workshops for various projects. Transportation Planning Representative r ojects Public Information Meetings Urban Preparations of Contract Plans, rt Bike and Pedestrian Design rian Facility Specifications and Estimates On -Call Pedestrian Facility Design; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development Pedestrian Group Education On -Call Bicycle Facility Design; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of B.S. Civil Engineering, 2012 Project Development Bicycle Group University of Minnesota, Twin Cities 2023 Rapid Implementation Projects; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works Professional Registrations 2022 Rapid Implementation Projects; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works Professional Engineer -Illinois; 062-068716 2021 Rapid Implementation Projects; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works Professional Engineer - Wisconsin; 48942-6 APRA Funded Reckless Driving Initiative; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Professional Organizations Works WTS Chicago Chapter American Society of Civil Engineers 2023 Protected Bike Lane Designs; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works Institute of Transportation Engineers Safe Routes to Transit; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works Arterial Resurfacing; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Chicago Streets for Cycling Phase IV, Project 3 — Phase I and II; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development; $3.0 million Lincoln Village Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge — Phase I and II; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development; $2.0 million Elmhurst Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project; City of Elmhurst Major Roadway and Arterial Design Jackson Park Improvements/Obama Presidential Center; Chicago Department of Transportation North DuSable Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering North DuSable Lake Shore Drive over LaSalle Drive Bridge Rehabilitation; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering, $3.1 million ISW North Lawndale: Ogden Ave, Pulaski to Roosevelt Corridor Improvements; Chicago Department of Transportation Arterial and Collector Streets Vision Zero: Year One High Crash Corridor Improvements; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Arterial Resurfacing; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Amanda Kleinwachter, P.E. Project Manager Arterial and Collector Streets (continued) Chicago West Side Safe Routes to School Enhancements; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development, $520,000 Cermak Road Vertical Clearance Improvement at Kenton Avenue — Phase I; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering, $2.7 million Citywide Construction Engineering; City of Chicago, Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Central Business District and Streetscape and Utility Improvements; Village of Glen Ellyn; $10 million Traffic Engineering and Impact Studies Various Traffic Engineering Services; City of Chicago — Office of Emergency Management & Communication As an Engineer at a previous place of employment, Amanda worked on the following projects: Transportation Planning and Corridor Studies 95th Street Corridor Study; Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Ridgeland Avenue Corridor Study; Regional Transit Authority and Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Village of Mahomet Master Transportation Plan; Village of Mahomet, Illinois Skokie Boulevard Corridor Study; Village of Northbrook, Illinois Traffic Impact Studies Unilever (Kilbourn Plant) Expansion; Chicago, Illinois 1001 W Chicago Avenue Mixed Used Development; Chicago, Illinois Six Corners Mixed Use Development; Chicago, Illinois NR 1 TransportTruckTerminal; New Lenox, Illinois Beck Road; Lake County Division of Transportation - Lindenhurst, Illinois Lyons Woods Trail; Lake County Forest Preserve - Waukegan, Illinois Buffalo Grove Road; Lake County Division of Transportation - Buffalo Grove, Illinois Giana Civito, P.E. Engineer V Expertise Giana has been employed by Civiltech since January 2018 and currently serves as a - secondary client contact on Phase I Study and Phase II Design Engineering projects Urban Bike and Pedestrian Facility Design for urban roadways and corridors. She specializes in Phase I and Phase 11 projects Transit Access Design and brings technical expertise on pedestrian and bike design for urban roadways. Roadway Design Prior to working at Civiltech, Giana had extensive internship experience where her responsibilities included managing quantities, pay estimates, and contractor Preparation of Contract Plans, coordination for the annual capital improvement projects. Specification &Estimates Municipal Street Maintenance Programs Representative Projects ADA Ramp Design Arterial and Collector Streets Transportation Planning Interagency Coordination Arterial Resurfacing; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Vision Zero: Year One High Crash Corridor Improvements; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Education B.S. Civil Engineering, 2017 Green Alley Program; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Purdue University Invest South/West Chicago Avenue; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division Professional Registrations of Project Development Professional Engineer -Illinois; 062-073978 Urban Bike and Pedestrian Facility Design Professional Organizations American Society of Civil Engineers On -Call Pedestrian Facility Design; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development Pedestrian Group On -Call Bicycle Facility Design; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development Bicycle Group 2022 Rapid Implementation Projects; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works 2021 Rapid Implementation Projects; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works APRA Funded Reckless Driving Initiative; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works Safe Routes to Transit; City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works Major Roadway and Arterial Design Jackson Park Improvements/Obama Presidential Center; Chicago Department of Transportation North Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering As an intern at a previous place of employment, Ms. worked on the following projects: Sidewalk Replacement Program; Village of Winnetka, Division of Public Works, $140,000 Street and Alley Reconstruction/Rehabilitation; Village of Winnetka, Division of Public Works, $1.3 million Lincoln Avenue Parking Lot Rehabilitation; Village of Winnetka, Division of Public Works, $270,000 Jen Hyman, P.E. Project Manager Expertise Jen has been employed by Civiltech Engineering since November 2011. She currently - serves as a Project Manager for Phase I projects involving environmental and location - Environmental Assessment design studies, traffic engineering and impact studies, and public involvement and Design Studies activities. Jen's experience includes a wide range of projects from spot intersection Road and Highway Design improvements to major roadway network changes. She continually expands her Intersection Design Studies knowledge base of policies and regulations related to the National Environmental Feasibility Studies Policy Act (NEPA) and associated laws. Jen has extensive experience preparing Traffic Engineering and Impact Studies environmental documents and effectively engaging both agencies and the public in the transportation decisionmaking process. Crash Analysis Representative ' ects Education Environmental Assessment and Design Studies B.S. Civil Engineering, 2010 Purdue University York/Harger Intersection and Underpass Improvement; Village of Oak Brook; M.S. Civil Engineering, 2011 $7.4 million Purdue University Environmental Impact Study and Design Report, North DuSable Lake Shore Professional Registrations Drive Phase I Study; Illinois Department of Transportation, Chicago Department of Professional Engineer -Illinois; 062-066983 Transportation Certifications Environmental Assessment and Design Report, Federal Actions In and Adjacent to IDOT Phase I Training, Jackson Park; City of Chicago, National Park Service, Federal Highway Administration; August 2017 $175 million ACEGIL Environmental Assessment and Design Report, U.S. Route 14 Grade Separation at Roadside Safety Design CN/EJ&E Railway; Village of Barrington; $60.5 million FHWA/National Highway Institute May 2016 Environmental Assessment and Design Report, Weiland Road/Lake Cook Road, Course No. 380032A Lake Cook Road to IL Route 22 and Buffalo Grove Road to Hastings Lane; Village of Roundabout Design Workshop, Buffalo Grove, Cook County Department of Transportation; $96.0 million August 2015 Northwestern Center for Public Safety Environmental Assessment and Design Report, Caton Farm and Bruce Road, Gaylord Road to Cedar Road; Will County Department of Highways Highway Safety Manual Online overview, Project Development Report, Quentin Road, U.S. Route 12 to IL Route 22; June 2015 Lake County Division of Transportation; $22.8 million FHWA/National Highway Institute Project Report, Darrell Road Phase I Study; Lake County Division of Transportation Course No. 380106 NEPA and the Transportation State Approved Categorical Exclusion Group II, Church Road Bike Path Phase I Decisionmaking Process, Study, Grove Avenue to Irving Park Road; Village of Bensenville; $1.6 million June 2018 FHWA/National Highway Institute Categorical Exclusion Group I, Caton Farm Road and Essington Road Intersection Course No. 142005 Improvement; City of Joliet; $2.5 million Advanced NEPA Workshop, Categorical Exclusion Group I, Greentree Parkway/Red Top Drive/4th Avenue September 2019 Resurfacing; Village of Libertyville; $1.4 million National Association of Environmental Professionals Categorical Exclusion Group I, Higgins Road (IL Route 72) Bike Path Phase I Study; Advanced NEPA Workshop: Final Rule, Village of Schaumburg; $700,000 Updates to the Regulations Implementing the Categorical Exclusion Group I, Rockland Road Phase I Study, IL Route 21 to St. Procedural Provisions of NEPA, Mary's Road; Village of Libertyville, Libertyville Township; $7.3 million October 2020 National Association of State Approved Categorical Exclusion, Golf Road Resurfacing, Butterfield Road to Environmental Professionals IL Route 21; Village of Libertyville; $1.8 million Professional Organizations State Approved Categorical Exclusion, North York Road/Harger Road Intersection Illinois Association of Improvement; Village of Oak Brook; $8.2 million Environmental Professionals Jen Hyman, P.E. Project Manager Feasibility Studies Tuscan Woods Noise Barrier; Village of Oak Brook North York Road Feasibility Study; Village of Oak Brook Hamilton Lakes/Elgin-O'Hare Expressway Access Study; Hamilton Partners Traffic Engineering and Impact Studies Vernon Hills Traffic Engineering Studies; Village of Vernon Hills Roselle Road and Bethel Lane Traffic Study; Village of Schaumburg Meacham Road at American Lane Crosswalk; Village of Schaumburg Glen Ellyn STP Application and Pennsylvania One -Way, Two -Way Study; Village of Glen Ellyn Morton Arboretum Access Study; The Morton Arboretum Site Design Engineering Panera Bread Site Plans; Village of Highland Park Mary Young, P. E., PTOE Senior Project Manager Expertise Mary has been employed in private consulting engineering since 1991. She - possesses expertise in comprehensive impact studies, traffic engineering, and Environmental and Design Studies environmental/location-design studies for projects ranging from intersection Feasibility Studies improvements to major roadway corridor projects. Mary has had extensive training Traffic Engineering in the National Environmental Policy Act procedures and methodologies and is pre- qualified by IDOT at the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) level. She is able to create effective stakeholder involvement programs as part of the context sensitive Education design process through her extensive knowledge of the transportation planning and B.S. Civil Engineering, 1991 implementation process combined with her communication skills. University of Illinois at Urbana -Champaign Professional Registrations Representative Projects Professional Engineer- Illinois; 062-050889 Environmental and Design Studies Professional Traffic Operations Engineer - National Certification; 346 Environmental Impact Statement, North Lake Shore Drive, Grand Avenue to Hollywood Avenue; City of Chicago; $3.0 billion Certifications Basics of Public Involvement in Transportation Environmental Assessment and Design Report, U.S. Route 14 at CN Railroad Grade Decision Making, August 2019 Separation; Village of Barrington; $62.8 million FHWA/National Highway Institute Environmental Assessment and Design Report, IL Route 31 Western Bypass, Course No. 142077 Edgewood Drive to Rakow Road; McHenry County Division of Transportation; Administrative Record, May 2016 $81.7 million FHWA/National Highway Institute Course No. 142062 Environmental Assessment and Design Report, Weiland Road/Lake Cook Road, NEPA and Transportation Decision Making, Lake Cook Road to IL Route 22 and Buffalo Grove Road to Hastings Lane; Village of June 2007 Buffalo Grove and Cook County Highway Department; $96.0 million FHWA/National Highway Institute Environmental Class of Action Determination and Design Report, IL Route 22, Course No. 142005 Quentin Road to IL Route 83; Illinois Department of Transportation; $36.0 million Beyond Compliance: Historic Preservation in Transportation Project Development, Environmental Class of Action Determination and Project Development Report, November 2013 Quentin Road, South of Long Grove Road to North of U.S. Route 12; Lake County FHWA/National Highway Institute Division of Transportation; $17.8 million Course No. 142049 Environmental Class of Action Determination and Project Development Environmental Impact Assessment: Report, Orchard Road, U.S. Route 30 to Jericho Road; Kane County Division of National Environmental Policy Act Transportation; $23.6 million and Related Requirements, April 2003 Environmental Class of Action Determination and Project Development Report, American Law Institute/ Fairway Drive Extension, U.S. Route 45 to IL Route 60; Village of Vernon Hills; $17.0 Environmental Law Institute million Environmental Impacts of Highway Projects, Project Development Report, Quentin Road, U.S. Route 12 to IL Route 22; Lake March 1998 University of Wisconsin at Madison County Division of Transportation; $22.8 million Context Sensitive Solutions Awareness Class, Project Report, Fairfield Road/IL Route 176; Lake County Division of Transportation; October 2006 $20.0 million Illinois Department of Transportation Project Development Report, Willow Road, West Village Limit to Provident Avenue; Professional Organizations Village of Winnetka; $6.0 million American Society of Civil Engineers Project Development Report, Caton Farm Road/Essington Road Intersection Institute of Transportation Engineers Improvement; City of Joliet; $2.5million Illinois Association of Project Development Report, Kreutzer Road Extension; Village of Huntley; Environmental Professionals $4.7 million American Public Works Association Project Development Report, Washington Street, Cedar Lake Road to Hainesville Road; Lake County Division of Transportation; $8.5 million Mary Young, P. E., PTOE Senior Project Manager Environmental and Design Studies (Continued) Project Development Report, Ridge Avenue Improvements, Howard Street to Lyons Street; City of Evanston; $6.6 million Project Development Report, Arthur Avenue/Davis Street/U.S. Route 14 Improvement; Village of Arlington Heights; $5.0 million Project Development Report, Barrington Road/Schaumburg Road Intersection Improvement; Village of Schaumburg; $6.5 million Project Development Report, Arlington Heights Road/Devon Avenue Intersection Improvement; Village of Elk Grove Village; $3.4 million Project Development Report, Wise Road, Roselle Road to Plum Grove Road; Village of Schaumburg; $6.3 million Project Development Report, Lively Boulevard, Devon Avenue toTouhy Avenue; Village of Elk Grove Village; $4.6 million Project Development Report, Devon Avenue/Tonne Road Intersection Improvement; Village of Elk Grove Village; $2.1 million Feasibility Studies Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (1-90) Master Planning Study, IL Route 53 to Higgins Road; Illinois Tollway 1-55 at IL Route 59 Joliet Interchange Improvement; City of Joliet 1-90 Corridor Study Local Agency Master Plan, IL Route 59 to Arlington Heights Road; Village of Schaumburg Lake -Cook Road/Arlington Heights Road Continuous Flow Intersection Study; Lake County Division of Transportation IL Route 60/Butterfield Road Grade Separation Study; Lake County Division of Transportation Strategic Regional Arterial Study- Subset No. 5; Illinois Department of Transportation North-South Arterial Traffic Study; Village of Barrington Naperville Road/Warrenville Road/1-88 Interchange Feasibility Study; DuPage County Division of Transportation IL Route 62/IL Route 31 Congestion Mitigation Feasibility Study; McHenry County Division of Transportation Traffic Engineering Traffic Impact Study, Bridge Street Town Centre, 360 -Acre Commercial Development; City of Joliet City -Wide Traffic and Parking Study; City of Park Ridge Various Traffic and Safety Studies; Illinois Department of Transportation City -Wide Traffic Engineering Study; Bike and Pedestrian Plan; City of Aurora Expertise Maddie has worked in the field of transportation since 2009. She has worked for - Civiltech since August 2014. Prior to Civiltech, Maddie worked in planning and design Environmental Assessment of commuter and high-speed rail corridors. Madelaine also spent three summers and Design Studies working in commercial construction as an intern. Her experiences include project Road and Highway Design management, development of design plans and specifications, project scheduling, Interagency Coordination train performance modeling, and working with GIS and CAD applications. Commuter Rail Studies Representative r ojects Feasibility Studies Alternate Analysis Environmental Assessment and Design Studies Corridor Planning Project Development Report, Main Street Phase I Study; City of Batavia Project Development Report, State and National Parkway Phase I Study; Education Village of Schaumburg B.S. Construction Engineering, 2009 Project Development Report, Rand Road Sidepath Phase I Study; City of Des Plaines Purdue University Project Development Report, Biesterfield Road and Oakton Street Resurfacings; Professional Registrations Village of Elk Grove Village Professional Engineer - Illinois; 062-065848 Project Development Report, John F. Kennedy and Elk Grove Boulevard Certifications Resurfacing and Bridge Improvements; Village of Elk Grove Village Fundamentals of Geometric Design Workshop, Project Development Report, Brickvale Drive Phase I Study; Village of Elk Grove Village September 2014 Northwestern University Center Project Development Report, Church Road Phase I Study; Village of Bensenville for Public Safety Feasibility Study, U.S. Route 45 at Dada Drive/Grant Avenue Trail Crossing; Professional Organizations Lake County Forest Preserve District American Society of Civil Engineers Categorical Exclusion, Greenwood Avenue Phase I Study; Village of Deerfield Project Development Report, York Street Sidewalk Phase I Study; City of Elmhurst Project Development Report, Proviso Drive Phase I Study; Village of Berkeley Categorical Exclusion, Industrial Pedestrian Connector; Village of Berkeley Environmental Assessment and Design Report, Caton Farm and Bruce Road, U.S. Route 30 to Cedar Road; Will County Department of Transportation Environmental Assessment, Jackson Park; Chicago Department of Transportation As an Engineer at a previous place of employment, Maddie has worked on the following projects: Rail Corridor Planning and Design IDOT Chicago-St.Louis High Speed Rail Project; Illinois Department of Transportation; $1.2 billion Denver Interregional Connectivity Study; Colorado Department of Transportation Dearborn to Kalamazoo Corridor Acquisition and Improvements; Michigan Department of Transportation Northern Lights Express Passenger Rail Project; Minnesota Department of Transportation Lake Forest Amtrak Hiawatha Station Stop- Operations Analysis; City of Lake Forest, IL Maddie Johnson, P.E. Project Manager Ohio Statewide Passenger Rail Project- Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement; Ohio Rail Development Commission/ Ohio Department of Transportation Milwaukee -Twin Cities High Speed Passenger Rail Corridor Program; Minnesota Department of Transportation Chicago -Milwaukee Tier 1 Environmental Assessment; Wisconsin Department of Transportation & Illinois Department of Transportation Midwest Regional Rail Initiative Phase 7; Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin Departments of Transportation Construction Management and Oversite Jesse Brown VA Hospital; United States Department of Veteran Affairs; $82.0 million O'Hare Facade and Circulation Enhancement (FACE) Terminals 2 & 3; City of Chicago Steve Pautsch, P.E., PTOE Project Manager Expertise Steve has been employed with Civiltech since June 2001. For over 13 years, he was - a full-time consultant to the Chicago Department of Transportation, providing Traffic Engineering and Impact Studies expert traffic engineering assistance, consultation, design, and review services in Pedestrian Studies the development and design of auto, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit infrastructure Bicycle Studies improvements. His responsibilities at CDOT included conducting various types of Traffic Signal and Signal System Design traffic studies and presenting results to city staff and elected officials, reviewing plans and studies submitted to the department, designing pedestrian and bicycle Intersection Design Studies infrastructure improvements, testifying at Plan Commission and other public School Studies meetings, and assisting with the development of department standards and Parking Studies policies. In 2019, he returned to Civiltech's Itasca office to serve as a Project Manager, Traffic Calming specializing in Traffic, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Studies. Steve also has expertise in traffic signal, signal system, and Intelligent Transportation Systems design projects. Intelligent Transportation System Design Representative Education Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Studies B.S. Civil Engineering, 2001 Valparaiso University Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan; City of St. Charles Professional Registrations Libertyville Village Bicycle Plan; Village of Libertyville Professional Engineer- Illinois; 062-058388 Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study; Village of Sauk Village Professional Traffic Operations Engineer- National Certification; 2020 Church Street Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements; City of Evanston; $3.0 million Farnsworth Avenue at Marshall Boulevard and Illinois Prairie Path Segment/ Certifications Intersection Improvements; City of Aurora; $250,000 Traffic Signal Workshop, 2002 Northwestern University Center Chicago Avenue, Latrobe Avenue to Kedzie Avenue HSIP; Chicago Department of for Public Safety Transportation; $2.9 million Traffic Signal Seminar, Buffalo Grove High School Pedestrian Facilities; Cook County Department of CECI/IDOT, 2002 Transportation and Highways; $100,000 Professional Organizations Broadway Foster Avenue to Devon Avenue; City of Chicago; Chicago Department of Institute of Transportation Engineers Transportation; $8.5 million Traffic n ineerin , Safety and Pedestrian Studies Central Avenue Safety Study; Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Greggs Parkway & Huntington Drive; Village of Vernon Hills Traffic Engineering Services; Chicago Department of Transportation Cook County On -Call Traffic Engineering Services; Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Elmhurst City Centre Traffic Review; City of Elmhurst Vernon Hills Traffic Engineering Services; Village of Vernon Hills Various Traffic Studies; Village of Libertyville Traffic Engineering Services; City of Highland Park Western Court Traffic Study; Village of Lisle Northern Terminus Traffic Study; Chicago Department of Transportation Traffic Signal and Signal System Design Project Development Report; Lake Street/Springfield Drive; Villages of Bloomingdale and Roselle Steve Pautsch, P.E., PTOE Project Manager • �,T_Zwimll a 1=0 JJ Traffic Signal and Signal System Design (continued) Biesterfield Road and Leicester Road Intersection Realignment and Widening; Village of Elk Grove Village; (Roadway and Highway Design); $1.0 million Flashing Beacon Installation, Wolf Road/Forest Avenue; City of Des Plaines Emergency Vehicle Preemption System Improvements (68 Intersections); City of Joliet Traffic Signal Modernizations, Signal Timing Optimization, Fairview Ave; Village of Downers Grove (7 Signal Fiber Optic Interconnect) Temporary and Permanent Traffic Signal Installation and Interconnect with Autoscope Vehicle Detection, Washington Street, U.S. 45 to Hunt Club; Lake County Division of Transportation Traffic Signal Installation, Washington Street, IL Route 83 to U.S. Route 45; Lake County Division of Transportation, (3 Signal Fiber Optic Interconnects) Traffic Signal Modernization, 63rd Street; Chicago Department of Transportation Traffic Signal Design, Big Hollow Road at U.S. 12 Frontage Road; Village of Fox Lake District 1 Miscellaneous Traffic Signal Designs; Illinois Department of Transportation -Division of Highways Naperville Road/Warrenville Road Traffic Signal Improvement; DuPage County Division of Transportation Emergency Vehicle Preemption System Improvements (10 intersections); City of Des Plaines Emergency Vehicle Preemption System Improvements (68 intersections); City of Joliet Emergency Vehicle Preemption System Improvements (18 intersections); City of Elgin Fire Department Intersection/interchange Design Studies Lake Street/Springfield Drive Intersection Design Study; Village of Bloomingdale Signal Warrant Analysis and Intersection Design Studies for Marcus Theater Entrance; Village of Addison Intelligent Transrtatin System Design Streeterville Traffic Signal Interconnect; Chicago Department of Transportation -Bureau of Traffic; (40 signals, video surveillance, fiber and wireless interconnect) Western Avenue Fiber Optic Interconnect with Traffic Signal Modernization; Chicago Department of Transportation - Bureau of Traffic • 115th to 10th Streets (7 Signals), $1.26 million • 59th Street to Cermak Road (24 Signals), $2.16 million • Addison Street to Howard Street (23 Signals), $4.24 million • Congress Parkway to Elston/Diversey (28 Signals, video surveillance capabilities); $4.7 million • Cermak Road to Congress Parkway (8 signals, video surveillance capabilities); $3.0 million Drainage Design Army Trail Road, Regency Drive to Swift Road; DuPage County Division of Transportation; $8.3 million Roadway and Highway Design Army Trail Road, Regency Drive to Swift Road; DuPage County Division of Transportation; $8.3 million Phil Hutchinson, PLA, LEED AP� Landscape Architect �p Expertise Phil brings nearly 12 years of experience leading urban design and landscape — architecture components for streetscape projects, and over 19 years of total Landscape Design experience working in the landscape architecture field. He has experience designing Project Management and developing pedestrian environments, community identifiers and gateways for Graphic Presentations streetscape projects in historic settings, and strives to incorporate green infrastructure Streetscape Design elements in every project. Community Identification /Gateways Representative Projects Custom Site Furnishings Design North DuSable Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Education Jackson Park I mprovements/Obama Presidential Center; Chicago Department Bachelors of Landscape Architecture, 2001 of Transportation Michigan State University Chicago Streets for Cycling Phase IV, Project 3A — Phase I and II; Chicago Professional Registrations Department of Transportation, Division of Project Development; $3.0 million Registered Landscape Architect - Illinois; 157-001258 NorthcenterTown Square; Chicago Department of Transportation; $1.0 million LEED Accredited Master Bike and Active Transportation Plan; Village of Wilmette CLARB Certified Central Business District Streetscape and Utility Improvements; Village of Glen Professional Organizations Ellyn; $28.0 million American Society of Landscape Architects At a previous place of employment, Mr. Hutchinson worked with Civiltech on the Active Transportation Alliance following projects: Council of Landscape Architecture Registration Boards (CLARB) North DuSable Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Burnham Park: 31 st Auxiliary Parking Log Expansion; Chicago Park District; $1.6 million Grant Park Skate Plaza; Chicago Park District; $2.5 million At a previous place of employment, Mr. Hutchinson provided Landscape and Streetscape Design services and Project Management on the following projects: Fulton Market District - streetscape, gateway signage, and custom furniture; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering Broadway and Lawrence - streetscape, community identifier, performance stage, and plaza design; Chicago Department of Transportation, Division of Engineering River Street - streetscape design and pedestrian space; City of Batavia Fred Anderson Park, including performance state and overhead canopy design; Chicago Park District West Park- playground and performance stage; Glencoe Park District Scoville Park- playground, performance stage, and plaza; Park District of Oak Park Expertise Kristin has been with Civiltech Engineering since May of 2002 and currently serves as - a Project Manager primarily on Phase II projects in the Design Services department. Roadway and Highway Design She specializes in geometric roadway design, bicycle and pedestrian facility design, Drainage Design highway design, street rehabilitation and reconstruction, and drainage design. Kristin Site Design Engineering routinely leads utility coordination on projects across company departments and Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction brings ADA design and compliance expertise. She is a strong leader with outstanding communication and organizational skills beneficial to both in-house design team Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design management and public involvement campaigns. Education RepresentativeProjects B.S. Civil Engineering, 2002 Purdue University Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Professional Registrations Central Business District Streetscape and Utility Improvements; Village of Glen Professional Engineer- Illinois; 062-059477 Ellyn; $24.0 million Certifications Naperville Downtown Streetscape - Phase II; City of Naperville; $5.0 million Illinois Fundamentals of Rozanne Drive over Westwood Creek Bridge Replacement; Village of Addison; Geometric Design, June 2003 $750,000 Northwestern University Brandywyn Lane and Thompson Boulevard Improvements; Village of Buffalo Grove; Center for Public Safety $4.85 million-Brandywyn; $6.52 million -Thompson Professional Organizations Circle Avenue; Village of Lombard; $1.4 million American Society of Civil Engineers Lombard Meadows Reconstruction Phase I and II; Village of Lombard; $5.2 million Olde Towne East Project; Village of Lombard; $4.9 million Duane Street Main Basin Improvement; Village of Glen Ellyn; $2.5 million North Industrial Park Street Rehabilitation; Village of Lombard; $2.7 million Mission Hills Road Rehabilitation; Mission Hills Homeowners Association; $1.2 million Forest Avenue, Hillside Avenue and Appian Way; Village of Glen Ellyn; $1.0 million Lively Boulevard / JFK Boulevard; Village of Elk Grove Village; $2.5 million Biesterfield Road / Oakton Street Resurfacing; Village of Elk Grove Village; $2.0 million Roadway and HighwayDesign 248th Avenue Phase II; City of Naperville; $13.0 million US 41 (Skokie Boulevard) and Lake Avenue Intersection; Village of Wilmette; $2.1 million Fremont Center Road Extension; Lake County Division of Transportation; $3.0 million IL Route 43 and Everett Road; City of Lake Forest; $2.5 million Lakeview Parkway and IL Route 60; Village of Vernon Hills; $6.1 million 55th Street (Dunham Road to Clarendon Hills Road); DuPage County Division of Transportation; $8.5 million Woodfield Road (Martingale Road to IL 53 East Frontage Road); Village of Schaumburg; $7.2 million Woodfield Road (Meacham Road to Martingale Road); Village of Schaumburg; $5.9 million Kristin Kalitowski, P.E. Project Manager Representative (Continued) Roadway and HighwayDesign (Continued) Gilmer Road and Midlothian Road; Lake County Division of Transportation; $12.0 million Algonquin Road at West Drive Intersection Improvements; Village of Schaumburg; $2.4 million Lake Cook Road; Village of Buffalo Grove; $45.0 million Salem Drive- Bode Road to Golf Road; Village of Schaumburg; $2.5 million Walnut Lane - Golf Road to Bode Road; Village of Schaumburg; $2.5 million Fairfield Road/Route 176; Lake County Division of Transportation; $11.8 million Shoe Factory Road Improvements; Village of Hoffman Estates; $11.5 million Barrington Road at Schaumburg Road; Village of Schaumburg; $7.4 million Illinois Route 31 (Western Algonquin Bypass); McHenry County Divsion of Transportation; $60.0 million IL Route 83 at Greenleaf Avenue; Village of Elk Grove Village; $3.8 million IL Route 83 at Pratt Boulevard; Village of Elk Grove Village; $3.4 million Greenwood Road at Glenview Road; Village of Glenview, $3.9 million Essington Road at Hennepin Drive; City of Joliet, $2.7 million Special Assessment 219 Watermain and Sanitary Sewer Replacement; Village of Lombard; $1.0 million Wright Boulevard; Village of Schaumburg; $5.3 million U.S. Route 30, U.S. Route 45 to IL 43; Illinois Department of Transportation; $30.0 million Wise Road Phase II Improvements; Village of Schaumburg; $6.3 million Haligus Road STP Improvement; Village of Huntley; $1.8 million Devon and Arlington Heights Intersection Phase 11; Village of Elk Grove Village; $2.6 million Lively Boulevard STP Improvement, Devon toTouhy; Village of Elk Grove Village; $5.0 million Lake Street/Springfield Drive; Village of Bloomingdale; $695,000 Contract RR -03-5168; I -Pass Only Lane Expansion (Plazas 37 and 51); IllinoisTollway; $1.5 million Naperville Road/Warrenville Road Grade Separation and 1-88 Interchange Improvement; DuPage County Division of Transportation; $68.0 million Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Meacham Road and Golf Road Bikepath Project; Village of Schaumburg; $1.3 million North York Street Sidewalk Phase 11; City of Elmhurst; $1.9 million Illinois Route 83 Bike Path - Foster Ave to Bryn Mawr Ave; Village of Bensenville; $1.4 million Rand Road Sidepath - Central Rd to Elk Blvd; City of Des Plaines; $3.8 million Church road Bike Path and Milwaukee District/West Railway Crossing; Village of Bensenville; $7.4 million Randall Road Transit Infrastructure Improvements; Kane County Division of Transportation; $900,000 Lake Cook Road; Village of Buffalo Grove; $45.0 million Fairfield Road/Route 176; Lake County Division of Transportation; $11.8 million Statement Of QWfifi(AWWS Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect SECTION 3 I 11, 1IL.......N li tc, II IV ..... ... .... I I e c, Study RELATED EXPERIENCE T ..........................0 Civiltech Services Provided Agency Coordination Key Project Components T \'\ \\i\ Rand Road Sidepath (Des Plaines) US 41 & Lake Ave Intersection (Wilmette) Church Street Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements (Evanston) Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study (Sauk Village) 167th Street Multi -Use Path (Orland Park) Middlefork Savanna Bridge and Trail Connection (Lake County Forest Preserve) IL Route 83 Bike Path (Bensenville) Beverly Road Bicycle Facility and Road Resurfacing (Hoffman Estates) Elmhurst Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project (Elmhurst) City of Chicago Arterial Resurfacing Program (CDOT) Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan (St. Charles) Des Plaines River Trail Central Feasibility Study (Active Transportation Alliance) Master Bike & Active Transportation Plan (Wilmette) Meacham and Golf Bike Path (Schaumburg) Arterial Bike Network _ Village of Mount Prospect Rand Road Sidepath - Central Road to Elk Boulevard City of Des Plaines Scope of Services Completing a Trail Connection along a Major Artery. Cii ilR clh "„"""""""" provided Phase 11, Rhase 111 and II::1hase 111111 Einghneering s irvv ces for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design this 1project. Coordination and Public Involvement Interagency Coordination Railroad Coordination The sidepath project extends along the south side of US Route 12 (Rand Road) from Central Road to Elk Boulevard through the City of Des Plaines.The new sidepath is Location Drainage Studies approximately 2.4 miles and includes two rail crossings. Wetland Delineation Project Development Report The sidepath project closed a major gap in the sidewalk network and allowed the Resident Engineering continuation of the Northwest Municipal Conference planned Evanston -Elgin Regional Bikeway through the City of Des Plaines.The project connects to several Construction Documentation programmed and completed improvements to create a continuous bicycle corridor Interagency Coordination through the length of Des Plaines. Utility Coordination An updated wetland delineation and wetland delineation report was required during project design, which included a full delineation of the project area. The presence Construction Cost of wetland areas not previously delineated was observed. Civiltech moved quickly $3.8 million to document our findings and submit the necessary permitting requirements, Funding minimizing impacts to the project schedule. ITEP Status Civiltech's Phase II team provided full design engineering services utilizing their multi- use path design expertise.The project was designed to meet the requirements for Phase I completed in 2017 federal funding. Phase II completed in 2020 Phase III completed in 2021 Civiltech's Construction Engineering Team administered the project and brought this Client Contact improvement through the myriad of standards and procedures required by IDOT for Jon Duddles, P.E., CFM federally funded projects. City of Des Plaines Public Works and Engineering Department jduddles@desplaines.org 847.391.6127 U.S. Route 41 (Skokie Blvd) and Lake Ave Intersection Improvement Village of Wilmette Scope of Services Providing Pedestrian Safety ENhance0Oe0ts.CiVfltedh lorovided ID[iaseU PM2Hr0inaryI'DBsigNand is[urreinfly pn0vWing Phase H �Design Eng�0eeidiilg Intersection Design Studies seiMceSto iriprove loedestr[ain Safety aind access�bflky at ti,iis(0terse[t[on Bikeway and Pedestrian Facility Design Alternatives Analysis Coordination and Public Involvement The U.S. Route 41 (Skokie Boulevard) and Lake Avenue Intersection Improvement project provides pedestrian safety improvements at the intersection as well as along ADA Ramp Design U.S. Route 41. Public feedback and the Wilmette Master Bike and Active Transportation Plan identified the intersection as a barrier to pedestrian and bicycle mobility. Construction Cost $I] million At the intersection, the existing corner islands atthe northwest and southeast corner will be removed. The corner turning radii at all four corners will be modified and Funding reduced to provide additional pedestrian staging areas at the corners and shorter 5Tp/ |Tcp ' pedestrian crossing distances. The traffic signal atthe intersection will bemodernized Status due to the removal of the corner islands.The crosswalks at all legs of the intersection will Phase | completed February 2O22 be modified. Also, Lake Avenue will be resurfaced to improve pavement conditions. Phase || anticipated completion Summer 2O23 Construction Start anticipated inFall 2O23 Ashared-use path will beconstructed along the west side ofU.S.Route 41 from Lake Client Contacts Avenue tothe Edens Plaza signal. Atthe traffic signal, the shared -used path will cross Daniel Manis'KE. tothe east side nfUSRoute 4land continue north toIllinois Road AtIllinois Road the ' Village Engineer shared -use path will curve east and continue to Sprucevvuod Lane Village ofWilmette 847-853-7602 The proposed shared -use path will provide connections to Edens Plaza and Skokie manisd@wi|me,tp.com Valley Baptist Church. It will also connect to future routes along Lake Avenue and Illinois Road identified in the Master Bike and Active Transportation Plan to provide future connections to Loyola Academy, Marie Murphy Junior High, Avoca Park, and North Branch Trail. Church Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements City of Evanston Scope of Services Overcoming Barriers to Improve Connectivity. 0vi1Redl-I us coirnll,:allethn e a IRhaso I study to provide oirn oiimtall,:� on and offs ... ��� 11 6C cll and a Feasibility Studies a s p°iiau acCou°r�o �octa iou°� Iliunli�6irn destinations iiflhin II vainstounn. Alternate Analysis .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ........ Bikeway and Pedestrian Facility Design Coordination and Public Involvement Church Street is a key route within Evanston linking a number of recreational, institutional, and commercial destinations between the Central Business District Interagency Coordination and the Skokie city limits. While there are facilities for people biking on much of Grant Writing Church Street, lack of dedicated facilities west of Dodge Avenue leads to a stressful Project Development Report experience for those choosing to ride their bicycles on that segment. Additionally, there is a gap in Evanston's off-street trail network along the east side of the North Shore Channel between Harbert Park and Beck Park. When this missing link is Construction Cost provided, the north -south pathway will become continuous between Green Bay $5.0 million Road and Oakton Street. Funding Local Civiltech is assisting the City to overcome a number of hurdles to successfully implement this project. Challenges along Church Street include limited roadway Status width, on -street parking, mature parkway trees, and varying contexts throughout Ongoing the corridor. Along the north -south corridor, additional obstacles are identifying a Client Contact path alignment in a constrained area where streets are discontinuous, Rajeev Dahal and there is limited space between school district property and the North Shore City of Evanston Channel embankment. rdahal@cityofevanston.org 847.448.8159 Civiltech has coordinated an extensive hybrid virtual and in-person public involvement campaign to gain input from an Advisory Committee, two school districts, and other community stakeholders. This feedback was synthesized to develop a plan for safe and comfortable bicycle and pedestrian facilities that overcomes these barriers. At the same time, this project is being designed to be eligible for grant funding, constructible, and to obtain Design Approval from IDOT. Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study Village of Sauk Village Scope of Services Rail -to -Trail: Civlillt clh lis leadng a team to Ih dllp south Cook County Anticipated Completion December 2023 The project kicked off with a robust existing conditions analysis. Civiltech developed Client Contact 200'scale plan sheets of the entire alignment, including alternatives for on -street Antonio Cooper options. We additionally developed cost estimates for the Illinois communities to Sauk Village, IL pursue a Phase I Engineering Study. We researched and provided recommendations acooper@saukvillage.org forTrail-Oriented Development and trailheads. Civiltech is also conducting extensive community engagement to gain feedbackfrom key stakeholders and the public, drawing upon their direct experience and relationships in the in the area, which includes pop -ups at community events, a Social PinPoint online interactive map, and a key stakeholder bus tour of the rail -to -trail corridor. andIndiana communities c'Olnln c't'fIh 6r major Ire liOlnall 'tirdl�s nor .I s Trail Planning &Design l �in a across li COnln^c�li�li�y fu°Ou�rn �Ihn GIS cOlr�nlrnnunlitlieto the I�u�O,.aO tu�alill lig IIrnli�nu°"n�, Iso a li< y deirneint. CAD Community Engagement This project involves services to prepare a feasibility and planning study for a potential Railroad & Utility Coordination extension of the Old Plank Road Trail (OPRT).This includes looking at the feasibility of extending the OPRT from its current terminus in Chicago Heights, east through the Villages of Ford Heights, Sauk Village, and Lynwood and Towns of Dyer and Construction Cost Schererville, to connect to the Pennsy Greenway in Indiana. The purpose of the study NA is to identify preferred trail alignments, including land adjacent to the rail corridor, Funding and develop a scope of work that can be carried forward for further development. The Invest in Cook focus is on an inactive rail line and involves coordination with several railroads and a Status utility company. Anticipated Completion December 2023 The project kicked off with a robust existing conditions analysis. Civiltech developed Client Contact 200'scale plan sheets of the entire alignment, including alternatives for on -street Antonio Cooper options. We additionally developed cost estimates for the Illinois communities to Sauk Village, IL pursue a Phase I Engineering Study. We researched and provided recommendations acooper@saukvillage.org forTrail-Oriented Development and trailheads. Civiltech is also conducting extensive community engagement to gain feedbackfrom key stakeholders and the public, drawing upon their direct experience and relationships in the in the area, which includes pop -ups at community events, a Social PinPoint online interactive map, and a key stakeholder bus tour of the rail -to -trail corridor. 167th Street Multi -Use Path Village of Orland Park Scope of Services Connecting Neighborhoods to Destinations. Gvfltech Iperforime Pl[ia e 2 l::ailgihneeuniling ciesigin fou° the 11 7�t[i Street irnUti use Iloath whidh Bikeway and Pedestrian Facility Design included both water aired railliroad cIr0ssings. Box Culvert Design Traffic Signal Design Interagency Coordination This one mile multi -use path will fill in existing sidewalk and path gaps to connect several neighborhoods in the Village of Orland Park from Steeplechase Parkway at the Railroad Coordination west end to 104th Avenue and Orland Grassland at the east end. Existing sidewalk Wetland Permitting will be removed and replaced with the wider path. Existing path sections is not Floodway Permitting ADA compliant and will be reconstructed as such.The project requires coordination with IDOT where the path will cross US 6 /Wolf Road as well as with Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways who hasjurisdiction of 80th Avenue. Construction Cost Pedestrian traffic signals will be upgraded and added at these intersections. $3.2 million Funding The path will cross Marley Creek.The existing single cell 12'x7'box culvert that coveys STP the creek underneath Wolf Road and 167th Street will be extended 16'to the south to accommodate the path. Floodway and floodplain impacts will occur as part of this Status extension. A compensatory storage area will be designed at the northwest corner Letting anticipated 2024 of 167th and Wolf. Permits will be required from IDOT, USACE, and MWRD for the Client Contact floodplain/way impacts as well as wetland impacts. Sean Marquez, P.E. Village of Orland Park Land acquisition is required from 5 parcels. Grading challenges at one parcel required SMarquez@orlandpark.org design of an aesthetically pleasing retaining to minimize impacts to the property 708.403.6171 and its mature landscaping. A new pedestrian crossing with signals and gates will be installed in coordination with Metra at the existing railroad crossing. Civiltech assisted the Village with the STP application for Construction and Construction Engineering. Middlefork Savanna Bridge and Trail Connection Lake County Forest Preserve District Scope of Services Bridge Erected, Trail Connected. Gvfltedh provided IPhase II„ II II, II II II, and Project Development Report Preparation of Contract Plans, Specifications, and Estimates Multiuse Bridge Bikeway and Pedestrian Facility Design Interagency Coordination Resident Engineering Construction Documentation Coordination and Public Involvement Construction Cost $2.1 million Funding Federal, TAP Status Phase I Completed 2015 Phase 11 Completed 2016 Phase III Completed 2017 Client Contact Randall Seebach Lake County Forest Preserve District rseebach@lcfpd.org 847.968.3262 tructurall Einghneeiding services oin this (project that creates a safer einviironnrrnent for jpedestriainns arnci Ilaiicycllists Icy 14airovli ling a shared use path~n aind flhe Onlly Ipedestiriarn li irici e over the Metra raiillroad tracks irn This project included a new bridge crossing the Metra railroad tracks, connecting the two legs of the trail.The bridge, designed by Civiltech structural engineers, was fabricated in 5 pieces, assembled on the ground into a single structure, then lifted into place with cranes on both sides of the railroad track. To avoid disruption to Metra services, the bridge was erected between 2 am and 5 am in the morning. The Middlefork Savanna Trail system consists of almost 5 miles of aggregate trail used for hiking, biking, and cross-country skiing through a dedicated Illinois Nature Preserve. The trail is part of an effort to connect larger regional trail networks and connects theTownline Community Park, south of the project limits, to the Middlefork Savanna Forest Preserve by the new 8 -foot wide shared -use path along the west side of Academy Drive from IL Route 60 to Faculty Circle. Crosswalks and pedestrian actuations with countdown pedestrian signal heads were installed at the intersection of IL Route 60 and Academy Drive. East of Academy Drive, the shared -use path continues east and crosses the Metra railroad tracks with the new 12 -foot wide, 221 -foot long bridge structure. The new path alignment into Middlefork Savanna follows the former driveway over the railroad tracks and onto the historic site of the J. Ogden Armour estate, currently Lake Forest Academy. The original bridge was demolished in 1954; however, parts of the original abutments still remain and were retained as part of the new bridge design. IL Route 83 Bike Path - Foster to Bryn Mawr Village of Bensenville Scope of Services Completing a Gap withine Bensenville BikePlan. OvHtedh was ,,,,, ,,,,, I Ilect�. iii os�� slfiiwlPlll�s�c�umPs�urll� �6in�a�°fir � to and Phase II II ID s6 in Roadway and Highway Design i ngi n�.eri of a shared nese nzadh ally in Coordination and Public Involvement Interagency Coordination I II..... I C' ute 83. Project Development Report Roadside Barrier Warrant Analysis Bikeway and and Pedestrian Facility Design Culvert and Bridge Hydraulic Structures Design Box Culvert Design Bridge Condition Report Type Size & Location Drawing Construction Cost $1.4 million Funding Federal Status Phase I and Phase II completed in 2020 The improvement is part of the Village of Bensenville Bicycle Plan. Civiltech successfully aided Bensenville in receiving Federal funding through the CMAQ application process. Busse Road (IL Route 83) has six lanes of high-speed traffic without any pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. The proposed improvement includes almost a half mile of shared -use path to be constructed within the Busse Road (IL Route 83) IDOT right of way. Following completion of the shared -use path, the Village of Bensenville will have bicycle connectivity to Busse Woods Forest Preserve and other regional destinations. The alternatives analysis of the shared -use path included different alignments to be studied. Poor soil conditions, including locations of peat, the existing drainage ditch, and the presence of four high-pressure petroleum pipelines required replacing the existing shoulder along Busse Road (IL Route 83) with curb and gutter to minimize the cut above the pipelines. Coordination with the pipeline companies resulted with potholing during both Phase I and Phase II to confirm the depths and horizontal offset of the pipelines. Client Contact Busse Road crosses an unnamed creek via a 6 -foot by 6 -foot box culvert. The proposed Joseph Caracci, P.E. improvement required the removal of the previous 15 -foot long, 1974 culvert Village of Bensenville extension and constructing a 22 -foot long new culvert extension. The wing walls were jcaracci@bensenville.il.us designed parallel to the roadway and bike path to retain the proposed embankment. 630.350.3431 A pedestrian railing was located adjacent to the bike path along the wing walls. Beverly Road Bicycle Facility and Road Resurfacing Village of Hoffman Estates Scope of Services Providing a NewConnection. Gvikedh is 1,,)irovidiing Phase II II IDesigin ����, ���� Eingiineeriing services for ths IFe eirall aid Iproject to connect pedestrian Roadway and Highway Design facilliuiies sqoarated Icy II w Highway Bridges Traffic Signal Design Preparation of Contract Plans, Specifications, & Estimates Construction Cost $3.2 million Funding STP and Invest in Cook Status Phase II Ongoing Client Contact Alan Wenderski, P.E. Village of Hoffman Estates Alan. Wenderski@vohe.org 847.252.5802 This project involves the design of pedestrian improvements along Beverly Road within the Village of Hoffman Estates.The project will provide a 10'wide path to connect to the existing bike path at the north project limits (Prairie Stone Parkway) and a future bike path at the south project limits (Beacon Pointe Drive).The existing bridge carrying Beverly Road over 1-90 will be modified to accommodate pedestrians on the existing deck. The wide barrier median will be removed and replaced with a narrower median. This will allow southbound traffic to be shifted to the east, creating space for the installation of a barrier wall between traffic and the pedestrian route on the deck. The approach slabs on the southbound pavement have settled overtime and will be replaced as part of the project. The existing asphalt pavement will then be resurfaced within the project limits. The shifting of traffic will also require the replacement of the traffic signal at the 1-90 WB Off -ramp. The Village acquired Invest in Cook funding for the Phase II design and STP funding for construction. Civiltech performed the Phase I design of the project to obtain Design Approval and will be performing the Phase III construction inspection. Elmhurst��'��U and Pedestrian �U� Update u��w�mm���««n�����n��nn���"D���u� City OfElmhurst Scope of Services Serving the Needs of Pedestrians and Cyclists of All Abilities,Cixikedh ~- providedServices tot�he CIty of[:.:]M0h0rst to b0fld off 0fprevious lo�lainn[ng Planning h�� �� cydle network. � ������� � City laede5tr0�i efforts��r�� a0�/ Landscape Architecture GIS Traffic The Bike and Pedestrian Plan provides a comprehensive network of improvements that were vetted by the community in a few robust rounds of public feedback. Due - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - tothe pandemic, the project team pivoted the second phase of the community Status engagement strategy to virtual and deployed innovative and interactive tools to Plan Adopted: reach residents and illustrate the draft plan recommendations. One ofthese highly May 2021 graphical tools included an ESRI Story Map of the recommendations. This provided Design and Construction nfProject residents a self -guided tour of the draft recommendations prior to taking a survey. Recommendations Anticipated: 202B02b Client Contact The plan targets improvements that will connect neighborhoods with their local Michael Litwin, KE. schools, as well neighborhoods within the City's business districts.The infrastructure City u(E|mhu,st improvement recommendations include enhancements of routes and intersections in mike]itwin@e|mhu,sto,O order tomake walking and cycling safe for riders ofall ages and abilities. 630.I0.3018 The project team worked closely with City planners and engineers tuidentify projects that were realistic, implementable and great candidates for grant funding including the Bike Path Grant Program (|DNR)'Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program (ITEP), Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ), Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), and Safe Routes to School (SRTS). Asa result of providing the City with an implementable and shovel-reaclyplan. The City has programmed projects tobeincluded intheir budget with design engineering and construction targeted through 2026. Civiltech is currently designing the first round of bike lanes and pedestrian projects that are anticipated to be installed in 2023. City of Chicago Arterial Resurfacing Program Chicago Department of Transportation Scope of Services Roadway Resurfacing with l e Streets Approach. Gv lltedh Project Programming mming is pirov6iu (Project Prograirnrnh'i , R ease II IDe i n, and Rha.se (III I[)esi in seri°prices for Idle City of C hl cag0's aninuall airteriall street iresruirfaciing GIS Mapping Roadway and Highway Design o pir grain, t talhng over 4.0 ir1'ailles per year. Project Development Report Preparation of Plans, Specs, and Estimates Pedestrian Safety Design Bike Facility Design ADA Ramp Design Construction Cost $40 million+ per year Funding Federal and Local Status Ongoing Since 2016, Civiltech staff has worked hand-in-hand with the Chicago Department of Transportation to deliver over 40 miles of arterial street paving annually.This work includes spatial analysis and priority scoring to aid in selection of projects, Phase I and Phase II plans, IDOT coordination, Project Development Reports, and incorporation of numerous bicycle and pedestrian accommodations into a major capital improvement program. Scoring for project prioritization incorporates criteria such as pavement condition, overlap with Vision Zero high crash areas, overlap with Streets for Cycling routes, and funding availability based on street classification and jurisdiction. Selection of projects for each year's annual program is an iterative process, with criteria and weighting updated frequently. Most recently, equity factors such as mobility and economic hardship data have been integrated into the scoring. Client Contact In addition to standard upgrades to ADA ramps and crosswalk striping, a major focus Dave Miller, P.E. of the program is incorporating multi -modal improvements into the resurfacing Chicago Department of Transportation projects. The project team works to identify opportunities to install curb extensions, david.miller2@cityofchicago.org bump outs, pedestrian refuge medians, and bus bulbs. Civiltech has proposed and 312.744.0488 designed hundreds of these treatments throughout the City as part of this program. Additionally, approximately three to five new miles of shared and protected bike lane are designed and installed each year as part of this program. St. Charles Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan & Complete Streets Policy City of St. Charles Scope of Services Combining the Power of Policyl i . Gvfltedh assisted ti -ie Transportation Planning Complete Streets Policy Writing Community Engagement GIS Renderings Construction Cost N/A Funding Local Status Completion Anticipated August 2023 Client Contacts Chris Gottlieb City of St. Charles cgottlieb@stcharlesil.gov 630.377.4408 City of St. Chades in dev&lophig ain actionaUle lallaun for a robust Ilailk and II,,)estirian network and Chen hrnh,,)lIeirnenthng it idlhrouc lli a new Coirq,.)IIete Streets IPollicy. Civiltech interviewed staff to understand the transportation project delivery process and how other departments, such as Community Development, weigh in on these decisions. From these findings, we wrote a Complete Streets Policy that will help guide the City in considering multimodal users in all future roadway and development projects. Implementation of the Complete Streets policy is guided by the Bike and Pedestrian Plan, which proposes a network of corridor, trail, and crossing improvements to improve safety for all users throughout the City. The approach to develop this plan was based on a review of crash, transportation, and land use data as well as an extensive community engagement process. The draft recommendations were presented as highly engaging renderings and other graphics. Des Plaines River Trail Central Feasibility Study Active Transportation Alliance Scope of Services Providing Safe Access and Connectivity to Vital Regional Resources. Gvfltedl-i 1�,)rovided loiCy[le and pedestrian 13�la0iniing services t0Active Trail Planning &Design Trainsporta1ioinAhlia0ce a0d Cook COUnty to coninect a crUciA gap hn flhe GIS DesPlai0es RiverTrafl[ Community Engagement This Study is exploring how a 2.5 -mile gap in theTrail can be connected between the Construction Cost Forest Park Blue Line Station (Forest Park), Illinois Prairie Path (Maywood) and the Salt N/A CeekTmi|near ZtthStreet (North Riveoide). Completing theTrai|isahigh priorityfur Funding our region and has been the focus ufseveral recent studies. If realized, the trail would runcontinuous|y�omtheVWscun»inbuvderthnough�umeof{nokCounty�must Local densely populated communities. Within the study area, a few destinations include Status Loyola University Medical Center, Hines VA Medical Center, and Miller Meadow. The Completion Anticipated June ZO25 study area is also focused on an underserved community, thus prioritizing the need for safe and reliable pedestrian and bicycle access to these key destinations. Client Contacts Maggie[ze,winski In coordination with Active Transportation Alliance, Civiltech employed robust Active Transportation Alliance engagement with key stakeholders inthe study area. The project team attended mag9ie@acti«etm»su'O community events, such as Tour de Proviso and Party for the Preserves, to hear 3l22lhO4/� � � feedback from the community. Pace operates multiple bus routes throughout this area, including the future Pace Pulse line on Cermak. Additionally, the terminus of the CTA Blue Line is at the Forest Park Station. Both CTA and Pace participated in the Steering Committee meetings and separate coordination meetings to ensure a safe and accessible transportation network and connectivity is provided for bus, train, and trail users in this area. Civiltech also established evaluation criteria for the potential trail alignments which traverse through neighborhood streets, the medical district, and Cook County Forest Preserve. The criteria included user experience, community connectivity, environmental considerations, and engineering feasibility. These criteria, in addition to community feedback, provided a methodology for prioritizing alignments and potential improvements. Master Bike & Active Transportation Plan Village of Wilmette Scope of Services Improving Wal i i i , and Access to Transit. Ilin Ilaalrtnersll~ p ����, ���� wIlli tll,) ti ­i Vlilllla e f fGlhm tt and Active Trainsp lrtadoin Illhanc , Transportation Planning o 0 IHt clh Iled the Ireatlloi n of a ComIPT11u1nity wide Master 11: ike and Active Landscape Architecture .tli°a lnsliarartatliou~n IPllaln. Traffic Analysis Bikeway and Pedestrian The goal was to create a forward -thinking initiative to collaborate on a consensus - Facility Design building plan that created a roadmap for transportation decisions in the Village.The Community Engagement plan provides a built environment program and policy recommendations. It also Geographic Information Systems includes a robust chapter on bike parking providing a framework for a complete Policy and Programming network of bike racks across the Village, including locations for racks as well as type, Recommendations design and installation recommendations. The project team used this planning process to leverage and build upon the existing Funding transportation assets in the community, such as regional trails, the CTA Purple Line, Local and the Metra rail commuter line. The plan made recommendations that fill in the Status gaps and create solid last -mile connections for all roadway users. Approved by the Transportation Commission August 2020 The team utilized both in-person as well as interactive online mapping applications to ensure that stakeholders were heard in the engagement process. The team's Client Contact approach to public involvement was uniquely tailored to the community and utilized Dan Manis, P.E. a process of determining not only advocates and champions, but also potentially Village of Wilmette hard -to -reach voices who don't show up to traditional public workshops. manisd@wilmette.com 847.853.7627 Civiltech's approach included the involvement of planners, architects, and engineers. Experts in each of these roles were key team members throughout the duration of the project.The project team utilized 3D renderings to illustrate how planning recommendations would look and Geographic Information Systems to identify challenges, opportunities, and prioritize recommendations. Finally, the approach utilized engineering cost expertise to further guide implementation. Golf and Meacham Bike Path Village of Schaumburg Scope of Services Connecting a Bike Path Network. GV111ted—i its Iproviding ID sign ����, ���� Er)g o,)iriiir) Services for this Il:::'ederA aid Iproject that doses gals irl the Roadway and Highway Design VdHa °5 bd<e loaflh ntV orC k. Interagency Coordination Bikeway and Pedestrian Facility Design Preparation of Contract Plans, This project closes gaps in the Village's bike path network on Meacham Road from Specifications, and Estimates Higgins Road to American Lane and on Golf Road from Meacham Road to Roosevelt Boulevard. The project consists of the construction of a 10 -ft. wide multi -use path, that replaces existing sidewalk in the two locations. Construction Cost $1.25 million These sections of path are adjacent to and will connect critical office and retail areas Funding within the Village. The path will also satisfy additional trail connectivity objectives Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) within the overall system. Of utmost importance is also the safety of the crossings that involve major roadways of substantial width with significant traffic volumes and Status movements. The design will focus on pedestrian safety. Construction Anticipated in 2023 Client Contact Funding for the Phase II design of the project and construction has been secured by Anna Kesler, P.E. the Villages through the federal CMAQ program, and all design will follow FHWA, IDOT Village of Schaumburg BLRS, IDOT BIDE (as applicable), MUTCD and the AASHTO Guide for the Development akesler@schaumburg.com of Bicycle Facilities. 847.923.6654 The ADA compliant design will upgrade existing curbs and ramps, replace driveway crossings, reconstruct existing corner islands, and modernize pedestrian traffic signals. Temporary easements and right of way will be procured from 6 parcels. Statement Of QWfifi(AWWS Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect SECTION 4 I 11, 1IL.......N li tc, II IV 71"No r1l 111"11, 1111 ll�� IN! Mull StatemmXt of OIuafificzitiRlans Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The Village of Mount Prospect is a progressive community with a vision to implement infrastructure projects that address all transportation modes. In 2012, the Village adopted a Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan intended to promote and encourage bicycling and walking throughout the community for both recreation and transportation. An important element of the plan is to install bicycle facilities or arterial streets. Because these roadways F connectivity across the Village, completir the network along these routes is crucial to enhancing residents'access to key destinations while improving safety for cyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Arterial routes often present significant barriers that pose challenges to implementation. Some of these could include limited right-of-way, high traffic volumes, environmental impacts, the need to cross major roadways and railroad tracks, and utility conflicts. Challenges other than physical barriers, such as interagency coordination and gaining consensus among stakeholders are also hurdles that must be overcome. This study will develop a plan to overcome th( barriers while considering cost, construct community input, and ultimately providii comfortable, and practical network for all Statolne i ii�t ill'1iujafficalllwns Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect PROJECT APPROACH Our multidisciplinary team of bikeway design experts will position each arterial bike route project to be ready for the next stage: which entails a full Phase I Study processed through the Illinois Department of Transportation to obtain Design and Environmental Approvals and ultimately construction. Understanding the Study Area: Evaluate Environmental Challenges through Context Sensitive Design In addition to Federal -aid standards, Civiltech also has expertise in environmental analysis, impact determination, avoidance and mitigation measures, and agency coordination. Civiltech is pre -qualified by IDOT for transportation projects at the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) level , and thus we understand the complex interactions between transportation engineering and environmental protection. A thorough research effort will be conducted to identify all potential sensitive environmental resources along each potential bike route. Possible resources include wetlands and waters of the United States, floodplains, water resources and aquatic habitats, threatened/endangered species, special waste, social/economic, cultural/archaeological/historic, and special lands. The projects must demonstrate compliance with the County and local Stormwater and Floodplain Ordinances as well as the criteria of other environmental permitting agencies such as IDNR. Civiltech's in-house water resources group has an outstanding track record of navigating high-profile projects through complex review processes of a wide range of jurisdictional agencies, including Cook County. .,:�.w�wu uiuwwWWW��11�1DINz"'"W _.',lam�K�. we will also conduct walking and biking tours of the area with key stakeholders to understand ground conditions. Additionally, we will document the arterial corridors and key crossings h a combination of ground and aerial drone photography, video observations and field ieasurements. Our team is adept at producing quick CAD base maps from aerial imagery that is supplemented y spot field checks. When considering new trail or sidepath alignments, we will select alternatives which would serve the safety and transportation needs, as identified by stakeholders and through community engagement, while resulting in the least amount of negative environmental impacts. The over -arching goal is first to avoid environmental impacts. f they cannot be entirely avoided, impacts must be minimized, and appropriate mitigation rategies must be recommended and implemented. Our environmental processing �rtise will help avoid impacts at the planning stage that may arise and cause a roadblock acts in future Phase I studies. Stiltenient of 01 iialii''i:°atim:ns Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect Civiltech's Arterial Program Experience — City of Chicago: Installation of Bike Lanes Reinstalled 12 12 11 11 0 r 2 4 Develop a Network of Bikeway Alignments that Harmonizes with Other Area Initiatives We understand that work has been conducted by the communities and organizations on potential bike routes and trail alignments in the area, through local comprehensive plans and regional studies including CMAP's Northeast Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan, Cook County's Bike Plan, and the Mount Prospect Bike Plan. The team will review previous studies and ongoing efforts to ensure that we aren't reinventing the wheel and considering past ideas that have received community support. As a part of this process, the project team will also consider policies, regulations and procedures of the implementing agencies, to understand obstacles and how the proposed network could fit into their project delivery process. Civiltech has in-depth experience working with municipalities to help achieve complete streets and trails designs within agency procedures. Leverage our Experience with Roadway Jurisdictional Agencies, the Federal -Aid Process, and Railroad and Utility Coordination Civiltech maintains an excellent working relationship with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and the Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways (CCDOTH), having completed a long list of planning, design and construction projects for each of these agencies. We are well -versed in the standards and guidelines of each of them. IDOT has maintenance and jurisdiction over many of the roadways in the study area. The future design and construction of any proposed route will undoubtedly require Federal funding assistance. Our team is extremely well -versed in navigating the complex Federal -aid implementation process. Several of the key personnel that we will assign to this project have twenty years or more of experience completing Federal -aid projects through the Illinois Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Together with project stakeholders, Civiltech will develop and study alignment alternatives that we believe will be acceptable to State and Federal transportation and environmental decision makers. Civiltech has an outstanding relationship with IDOT's District 1 Bureau of Local Roads and Streets (BLRS). We encourage the Village to contact IDOT BLRS staff to discuss our experience and capabilities. At the end of the Study, if desired, Civiltech could provide a recommended Scope of Services to help the Village pursue subsequent Phase I studies. Stiltenient of i' 1iiaiii''ica ion Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect The railroads are open to providing safe crossings of their facilities, but this coordination also takes thoughtful planning and time. We recently finished construction on the Rand Road Sidepath in Des Plaines which crossed both Union Pacific and Canadian National Railroads.The coordination process began with the ICC who was very willing to assist with the process and petitions needed to install new crossings. We then worked with each railroad to determine options for the crossings and the space needed for pedestrian gates and with the City to develop the appropriate exhibits for the agreements needed for the construction and maintenance of the crossings. We understand that each railroad has different requirements to work through, such as different levels of design review by the railroads which may be billed to the Village, what material types are allowed in their ROW, and which work items the railroad will perform instead of the Village's contractor. Coordination with ComEd and other utilities will be an important early task when corridors are identified as potential bike routes. Utility poles often have the ability to be relocated but it is important to consider what space is available for the poles to relocate into once a bike path is installed. Planning ahead for a large scale relocation such as ComEd poles by reviewing possible available space will save on the design and construction time (upwards from 20 weeks for design alone). It is also important to identify who hasjurisdiction of the roadway, who is letting the project, and whether or not there are any prior rights easements granted to utilities.The answers to those question could add additional costs to any given bike route option. Constructing paths within ComEd right-of-way introduces another level of coordination. A 15 -foot clearance from tower foundations is the first feasibility check. Submitting a ROW Land Use Request through the ComEd Real Estate department early on and seeking their commitment to reviewing preliminary alignments will identify any red flags and other ComEd requirements, such as preferably no concrete paths. Every project Civiltech designs has a detailed level Jination, but we also have recent experience with paths and roadways in ComEd vay, such as for the Rand Road Sidepath in Des Plaines and the Skokie Valley Trail in Atte, Skokie, Glenview, and Northfield. ,esent Viable Solutions and Build Consensus through Equitable Stakeholder Involvement Public participation is key to ensure recommendations are contextual. Key stakeholders include school and park districts, residents and HOAs, business groups, local advocacy and community groups, trail users, Cook County, Forest Preserve of Cook, Pace, and IDOT. We will begin the process by talking to stakeholders to understand how to best reach individuals in their communities. We will also consider demographics of the area, to target outreach to places traditionally under- served by transportation and bring non-traditional voices to the table. Stateinent of illliii.c:fiitications Arterial Bike NetworkStudy Village of Mount Prospect Our proposed team consists of engaging presenters that think outside the box.The traditional public meeting can be hard for many users of trail and bike route systems to attend. We will find ways to reach diverse voices of the community in ways that are convenient and fun, such as tabling at community events, creating beautiful online interactive maps, and conducting focus groups and stakeholder interviews. Our team is familiar with the area and the community from both personal and professional experience. Working with partners, our team will engage a broad range of stakeholders in the outreach process, including: -Those new to and familiar with the public planning process •A diverse geographic representation of the study area Iffm-Typically underserved groups, including young people, seniors, individuals with limited English, minorities and lower-income individuals As our namesake implies, Civiltech prides itself on employing state -of -the art technology in our civil projects. Our in-house drone pilot can provide aerial drone photography so that the team d*b can create powerful, communicative visualizations for both design and public ThANFRASTRUCTURE involvement purposes. Our online engagement capabilities result in graphically N V E S T M E N T beautiful project websites. Relatedly, we have GIS expertise to create and maintain online crowd -sourced community engagement maps through ESRI Online. andJOBS ACT Plan and Design with Funding in Mind Securing funding will be an important next step in the implementation of the study. As part of the project, our team will provide feasible strategies for funding the subsequent projects. With grant writing experts on staff, Civiltech has secured millions of dollars for communities through Invest in Cook, STP, CMAQ and ITEP. The team secured Invest in Cook grant money for the Village of Berkeley, STP/CMAQ for Lake Cook Road, as well as CMAQ/TAP and ITEP for three underpass bridge projects for the Lake County Forest Preserve District, to give a few examples. We also understand that some of the bike network will be funded and built in stages. We will deliver a ranked list that categorizes each project as a near, mid, or long-term priority. T P In addition to an in-person public �~ .. A workshop, the project team proposes to create a engagement J public �rw -1 � 1 platform to be specifically developed .......:ww 1 . for this project. Our online , engagement strategy consists of \1 a project website, crowd -sourced .oml interactive GIS -map, and online survey. 1 o Options for those without access to r;;, internet will also be provided, such as flyers, posters and signs with a number to leave a voice message as well as a paper version of the online survey. Working with partners, our team will engage a broad range of stakeholders in the outreach process, including: -Those new to and familiar with the public planning process •A diverse geographic representation of the study area Iffm-Typically underserved groups, including young people, seniors, individuals with limited English, minorities and lower-income individuals As our namesake implies, Civiltech prides itself on employing state -of -the art technology in our civil projects. Our in-house drone pilot can provide aerial drone photography so that the team d*b can create powerful, communicative visualizations for both design and public ThANFRASTRUCTURE involvement purposes. Our online engagement capabilities result in graphically N V E S T M E N T beautiful project websites. Relatedly, we have GIS expertise to create and maintain online crowd -sourced community engagement maps through ESRI Online. andJOBS ACT Plan and Design with Funding in Mind Securing funding will be an important next step in the implementation of the study. As part of the project, our team will provide feasible strategies for funding the subsequent projects. With grant writing experts on staff, Civiltech has secured millions of dollars for communities through Invest in Cook, STP, CMAQ and ITEP. The team secured Invest in Cook grant money for the Village of Berkeley, STP/CMAQ for Lake Cook Road, as well as CMAQ/TAP and ITEP for three underpass bridge projects for the Lake County Forest Preserve District, to give a few examples. We also understand that some of the bike network will be funded and built in stages. We will deliver a ranked list that categorizes each project as a near, mid, or long-term priority. Statement of Givalffications Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect SCOPE OF SERVICES Our scope will include the following elements: 1® Detailed WorkStrategy In this phase, the project team will develop a work plan and schedule, agreed upon by the Village.The project manager and team will understand what success looks like to the Village and define the deliverables and timeline to ensure that the project stays on-time and on -budget. Project Kick-off Meeting with Village representatives Our project team will meet with representatives from the Village to review: • Community engagement strategy: Including the number and type of meetings and suggested stakeholders • Proposed Working Group members • Identification of all prior plans and studies that should be taken into account as part of the current effort • Any issues and priorities to be considered above and beyond the existing plans and studies • Project Schedule, including deliverables Check -ins Throughout the planning process, our team will schedule regular check -ins with project leaders from the Village. The majority of these check -ins are anticipated to be virtual meetings. When necessary, our project team will meet for check -ins in person. ® Review Existing is The project team will review existing documents and datasets that could impact study direction and recommendations. The review will include but not be limited to the following: Stiltement of Qiijaiii''ica ion Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect • Local and regional plans and documents related to bicycle routing and infrastructure • Other datasets to review: - Local and regional bike routes - IDOT traffic count data - Sidewalk, signs, parking, and bike parking inventories - Pace and Metra data (as available) - Land use - Previous pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic counts - Right-of-way (as available) - Destinations - Roadway and pedestrian lighting inventory (as available) - Aerial imagery: download - IDOT crash data (including detailed crash reports online or acquired througl where warranted) Civiltech drones • Documents and Datasets Inventory: To track findings and important details found in the review of existing documents and datasets, the project team will create an inventory matrix of all key findings. This matrix will be referenced later in the plan recommendation process and will be used as a summary resource for the entire project team. Our team's objective for this task is to create a strategy for regular and robust community engagement, which will gather feedback on safety, accessibility and mobility priorities on the arterial bike network. This input will inform the project process and result in a final study that is representative of the Village's vision for improving safety and equitable bicycle access, and also integrates the community's priorities and values. Community Engagement Plan Develop a Community Engagement Plan that outlines the various methods of outreach to those within the Village and surrounding communities. The engagement plan (pending our discussions with the Village): • Working Group meetings, focus groups, and interviews with key • In-person public workshops • Pop-up tabling at events (optional) • Public survey, including an interactive GIS -based map for receivii Stateieec of ill lillic!liitications Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect tRfll lllIIIDRIVE f„� Uie�w fc�c�ovu k'uxlllrrrtroau Aarr�rrua¢ ora T ;, 71 ri Statement of Ciiiimiif ati=s Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect Public Meeting 2 (optional) Our team, in collaboration with the Village, can host and facilitate a second community workshop. This workshop will be hosted in the same "Station s-Style"format where our team can provide an update on the project and receive input on proposed arterial bike network improvements and conceptual design alternatives. Exhibits will be prepared from the transportation analysis work that will be used at these stations to guide discussions and engage participants. A Spanish translator will be present at the workshop to help facilitate discussions with Spanish-speaking participants. Pop -Up Meetings (optional) To further broaden the reach of public engagement, the team can coordinate with institutions throughout the Village to host pop-up tabling opportunities at community events related to bicycling and/or in the lobbies of buildings. During these events we will pass out information about the project to those who live, work and study in the Village, and solicit responses to the survey. In addition to the below data collection tasks, the survey portion of community engagement is planned to include more qualitative data collection from Village residents, employees, and visitors. The survey will solicit locations of concern from a bike/pedestrian safety standpoint. And will include a mapping component for stakeholders to indicate the locations of concern and desired improvement. Traffic Data A review of the IROADS, IDOT's traffic database, reveals turning movement counts are available for some of the intersections within the study limits. However, there are be corridors, such as Kensington Road, where a road diet could be evaluated and traffic data is not available. New 24-hour turning movement and classification counts using Miovision camera technology can be performed to supplement existing data. The Miovision technology provides counts of vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists at the intersection. These results will allow for a sampled comparison with the IROADS data. Up to eight intersections will be selected in consultation with the Village. If the Village desires to establish a new baseline of counts throughout the study limits, then this scope item can be revisited and additional traffic count locations can be added. Strava Data If desired, the project team can assist the Village in securing free access to the Strava bicycle and pedestrian data for the Village. While the data is a partial representation of overall pedestrian and bicycle activity, it can provide some helpful insights, especially when considering prioritization of future projects. Stag mffl°ut of CiiiivaiitWu°rcuuhunc Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect GIS Field Inventory/Base Mapping Review and record existing land use, physical streetscape conditions, and development issues in the field. In addition to our physical analysis, our team will provide a general assessment of corridor infrastructure conditions, which may include utilities, existing traffic/transportation, parking, and pedestrian/bike modes and facilities. Photolog The project team will perform an existing area reconnaissance and prepare a photolog documenting existing conditions, including challenges and opportunities. Supplemental Drone Data Collection There may be locations where an evaluation of the existing topography or current aerial imagery of a corridor could be beneficial in the development of the potential alternatives. While it is anticipated that topographic survey will not be required for the study, the use of existing plans and GIS data can establish a baseline for the existing conditions. There may be locations, however, with incomplete, outdated, or missing data. Civiltech proposes to use its drone capabilities to capture current aerial photography at locations to be determined on a corridor by corridor basis. Crash Analysis A review of the 5 -year pedestrian and bicycle crash data along the study corridors can help identify any potential cluster sites and need for pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements. Recommendations for preferred alternatives will evaluate the potential safety improvements. The matrix to be developed prioritizing projects can also include a safety element, and projects can be identified as potential candidates for Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSI P) funding. In corridors where additional lanes or road diets are considered, a Highway Safety Manual analysis can be completed to quantify the safety of the proposed improvement. fiP d,frTOa R aO'rdary Propaswrd 81ko a W,'Pwdwslba w Notwawk by; Facilky^T pm Ir tmmdion pimpnsuoauaareh OHIO I'awrkor OP&Ao 'Pace �,� OoRtnr&.a,d SPrtwrurl u�urusw � EieuYfw�t�wx9 dtw�w l a�.r+xa � � W'Nm,�C(Frdirrp �V,h"o�w,piv i5rrl,y '$lb Me nr4d Pu J@410dn F"k-I ,gpPw,w �" w°neap✓' ...... Pwwn�lvdpi oW mw�ti ��������� IMulytPle Opp cans (11,Bkerk'Rw ...... l+:xewLi pYfWe Pddwou k lw) - R1O rw4& le'J knc`nrlmvs O"[Y Statement ofGivaliiicaion Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect Traffic Data Collection and Analyses While the"rule of thumb" of 16,000 vehicles per day can generally be used to identify potential corridors eligible for road diets, additional analyses would be required at intersections to determine if sufficient operations could be maintained with a reduction of travel lanes. We would use the Synchro/SimTraffic software package to model these corridors to confirm the feasibility of potential geometric improvements including road diets. These analyses could be used to obtain buy -in from IDOT for potential improvements along roadways under State jurisdiction. Jurisdiction Review and Design Criteria It will be important to establish the required design criteria for each project corridor in order to identify potential alternatives. Any design along an IDOT roadway will be subject to the design criteria outlined within the Bureau of Design and Environment manual. Designs along CCDOTH roadways, Village roadways, and railroad and utility corridors are subject to the design criteria outlined in the Bureau of Local Roads and Streets manual. In our recent project experience, IDOT has been requesting jurisdictional transfers for unmarked State routes rather than granting design variances. A review of the design criteria and roadway jurisdiction can help identify potential corridors that may be requested for a jurisdictional transfer. Stiltenient of Olua ii''ica ion Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect CAD Transportation Base Map Development We will review and record existing land use, physical streetscape conditions, and development issues in the field. In addition to our physical analysis, our team will provide a general assessment of corridor infrastructure conditions, which may include utilities, existing traffic/transportation, parking, and pedestrian/bike modes and facilities. Civiltech's designers are adept at efficiently developing extremely accurate base drawings in CAD over aerial imagery. We propose to develop these plans without acquiring a full detailed topographic survey of the project limits, similar to plans Civiltech completed for Chicago and Elmhurst. In place of topographic survey, our engineers will plot essential existing condition information by merging information available from aerial photography, ground photos and Google Streetview, which can be supplemented with GIS linework, and/or drone photography if desired. The information can then be measured and verified at key locations in a field check.This method of base map preparation is faster and more cost-efficient i �I� , �i�ililllilill► than acquiring topographic survey for a large area of work, and still provides a sufficient , level of detail and accuracy for the proposed scope of work. Key measurements will be verified in the field where necessary. Preparation of Existing Conditions Report The project team will synthesize the collected data into an existing conditions report with summaries of each category of data collected and mapping of the data where appropriate. 5. DEVELOP ARTERIAL BIKE NETWORK ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Fieldwork walk/ride with Village Staff and Key Stakeholders After acquiring and reviewing key datasets and the initial round of community engagement, the project team will plan a day to walk and/or bike around the Village to capture photos and assess on -the -ground conditions. The Village staff and other relevant key stakeholders (e.g. working group members) will be invited to join. Statement of i'li,iimiitk sties,°: Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect Review and Mapping of all Collected Information During this phase, the project team will overlay the recommendations from: • Previous planning efforts (e.g. 2012 Village Bike Plan) • Findings from the quantitative data collection and analysis, • Findings from the qualitative public engagement/survey results • Findings from the fieldwork Development of Recommended Arterial Bike Network Improvements Consistent with the Village goals of improving bicyclist safety and overall encouraging biking and other modes of transportation, the project team will develop Village -wide GIS mapping of physical bicycle recommendations, including: • Intersections (ped and bike crossings) • Mid -block crossing locations • Facility entrances • Off-street multi -use path connections • Arterial bike network new and improved alignments Mapping of these proposed improvements can be shared with the stakeholders through the public meetings, surveys and other engagement activities for input and feedback on prioritization of various improvements. Bike Corridor Concept Plans Based upon the proposed recommendations, the project team will create plan view diagrams for each of the major arterial bikeway corridors using the CAD base plan sheets. The conceptual plans will identify potential locations for right-of-way acquisition, traffic signal improvements, potential Section 4(f) impacts, structure improvements and other design considerations that will aid in the scoping of future Phase I studies. These conceptual plans will position the Village to be able to proceed to full design and implementation and begin to realize the desired safety benefits throughout the community. y',, WOUS tNJURIESAR., �C b 'C POIVSIBILITY is sY-tNW Agency Coordination Several of the arterial roadways identified in the Arterial Bike Network Study Map are under thejurisdiction of either IDOT or CCDOTH. Agency coordination will be completed to present the preferred concept alternative and receive"buy-in"from the jurisdictional agency. ATechnical Memorandum will be prepared for each jurisdictional agency detailing the existing conditions and the preferred concept alternative with the ultimate goal of receiving concept approval or notification to proceed with the detailed design. Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect 6. DEVELOP IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING STRATEGIES Develop Cost Estimates The project team will develop planning -level cost estimates for the bikeway corridors that the Village can use to program into their budget and pursue funding opportunities for the next stages of the project and/or construction. Prioritization and Phasing Analysis The project team will utilize a data -driven approach to providing a prioritization and phasing schedule for the plan recommendations. The results of this analysis will define recommendations as near, mid, and long term projects as well as low, medium and high priority. The analysis can also be used as supporting materials in grant funding applications. Key criteria for prioritization can include: • Village staff input • Crash and traffic data • Community engagement findings • Proximity to transit or other centers of activity • Demographics/equity (e.g. ADA accessibility) • Jurisdiction • Cost/construction/ROW feasibility • Environmental processing • Development projects planned within the Village • Recommendations mentioned in a previous plan or study Funding Strategies • Cost estimates: cost estimates or ranges will be provided for each recommendation. • Funding sources:The implementation section will also provide information on available funding sources. There will be a chart of applicable funding sources for each recommendation. Issues to be considered Libe tyville Boundary sommm High Priority %/ Inters ion/Crossing Improvement �D011 �,�i1�111 Park or %vert SPaae MediumPriority Existing "mail or Path Railroads Mediurn-Low Priority x . Proposed or Planned Trail or Pat'lr What are the Village's short-term, medium-term and long-term goals with this project and how can this plan best address them to meet the transportation needs of the community? St lterwient of i' 1ijaiii''ication Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect 7. PREPARE DRAFT ARTERIAL BIKE NETWORK STUDY Draft Plan Development After presenting the recommendations developed in Task 5 and 6 to the Village Commission, staff, working group, and other stakeholders, the project team will revise the recommendations and then formulate them into a cohesive document to be presented for review and comment to Village staff, Commission members, and the working group. Coordination with the Village staff Review of the draft study document and insights on how the study can best be formatted to meet the needs of the Village. Issues to be considered Coordination and efficient integration of staff and community feedback. 8. PREPARE FINAL ARTERIAL BIKE NETWORK STUDY Final Plan Revisions Based on feedback from the Village Staff, the project team will revise and provide the plan in final format. Plan Adoption The project team can assist Village staff in preparing a PowerPoint and presenting to the Transportation Safety Commission and Village Board for adoption. ESRI Story Map (optional) The project team can put together an ESRI story map of the study highlights to help stakeholders understand the process, final recommendations, and next steps to implementation. Plan Launch/Champions Workshop (optional) The project team can assist the Village in hosting a workshop to introduce the study to key champions and then go on a celebratory study launch bike ride to view proposed roadways for improvements with the key stakeholders. 1"{. dlu iA- t. 'A N' N'°, r,rtkC , & a'<rr ,r fo._ it ,o� l'... is, ,d-a.J 11 foal n'r-I,I M', b al -1d c nh"'I ltl, l",q Ir e rLr"�:l Mk -La +. 17-117-31 MM-TY7.11 r4 k,^r r h., a o as r.... 9 n r ro,xtka, wat11, gii, 4ri v sm, vimr ir.4Q D r:a r,,Mu � 4m .'lPru1 ¢re1rw..�rr1 r¢+I I. IriWa 4oe0ma ➢, r,w mmaff, " Pa-i".ern 14trr{;"•., or'd i r rr .Mii , l 1." "1 <9i r,w m� ri vcin dl e� q , kr, >z 4 u u�i I rn i� i N�ufl1v, pus+•mnu < bm, y� lo rof it , wirtuxxi x"m",1 Y t &d, Statement of Nafifications Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect SECTION 5 tcl, "Y . . � IL1� (I A IID "o a C " 1� -1 L Statemmt of Giiija itiezitions Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect PROJECT SCHEDULE M N O N N O N Early September 20230 Notice to Proceed September 13, 2023 0 September through October 2023 0 October through December 2023 0 January through February 2024 0 Kick -Off Meeting Develop Detailed Work Plan and Stategy (including Communication & Community Engagement Plans) Collect Data and Review Existing Conditions Develop Recommended Arterial Bike Network Improvements March through April 20240 Implementation Strategy, Cost Estimates, Funding Considerations, and Next Steps April 2024 0 April through May 2024 0 June through July 2024 0 Complete Draft Arterial Bike Network Study Agency Review of Draft Study & Presentation to Transportation Safety Commission Final Arterial Bike Network Study and Presentation to Village Board of Trustees Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect Scope of Services Project Approach The Village of Mount Prospect has identified the need for an Arterial Bike Network Study to continue to promote the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, adopted in 2012. An important element of the plan is to install bicycle facilities on many of the arterial streets through the Village. Because these roadways provide connectivity across the Village, completing the network along these routes is crucial to enhancing residents' access to key destinations while improving safety for cyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Arterial routes often present significant barriers that pose challenges to implementation. Some of these could include limited right-of-way, high traffic volumes, environmental impacts, the need to cross major roadways and railroad tracks, and utility conflicts. Challenges other than physical barriers, such as interagency coordination and gaining consensus among stakeholders are also hurdles that must be overcome. This study will develop a plan to overcome these barriers while considering cost, constructability, community input, and ultimately providing a safe, comfortable, and practical network for all users. II. Scope of Services The following is the proposed scope of services for the Arterial Bike Network Study. Additional detail regarding the individual scope items are provided in the Statement of Qualifications. Item 1 — Detailed Work Plan and Strategy — This work item includes developing a work plan and schedule with the Village and defining deliverables and timeline. This includes the following: a. Preparation for and attendance at project Kick -Off Meeting with Village representatives b. Preparation for and attendance at regular Village Update Meetings, assume 6 meetings. c. Preparation of Detailed Work Plan and Strategy Memo, including project schedule and exhibits. This includes two revisions based on reviews from the Village. d. Preparation of Project Management/Communication Plan. Includes one revision based on Village comments. e. Preparation of Preliminary Community Engagement Plan. Includes one revision based on Village comments. Item 2 — Review of Existing Documents — The project team will review existing documents and datasets that could impact study direction and recommendations. The review will include but not be limited to the following: a. Collect and review previous local and regional studies and existing roadway plans and documents related to bicycle routing and infrastructure. b. Collect and review local and regional data sets including: • Local and regional bike routes • Sidewalk, signs, parking, and bike parking inventories (as available) September 8, 2023 -1- Exhibit A-1 • Previous pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle traffic counts (as available) • Roadway and pedestrian lighting inventory (as available) • IDOT crash data (including detailed crash reports where warranted) • IDOT traffic count data • Pace and Metra data • Land use • Right-of-way • Destinations • Aerial imagery: downloaded online • Supplemental drone aerial c. Create inventory matrix and exhibits of all key findings. Item 3 — Outreach Strategy — The objective for this task is to create a strategy for regular and robust community engagement, which will gather feedback on safety, accessibility and mobility priorities on the arterial bike network. This input will inform the project process and result in a final study that is representative of the Village's vision for improving safety and equitable bicycle access, and also integrates the community's priorities and values. This work item includes the following: a. Develop a Community Engagement Plan b. Prepare and update project website c. Prepare for and attend Key Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Group Meetings (up to 10 meetings). Focus Groups/Stakeholders to be determined by the Village. d. Prepare for and attend Public Meeting #1 e. Prepare and administer Community Survey and GIS -based Interactive Map f. Prepare for and attend Public Meeting #2 g. Prepare for and attend Pop-up Meetings (2) Item 4 — Data Collection - In addition to the below data collection tasks, the survey portion of community engagement is planned to include more qualitative data collection from Village residents, employees, and visitors. The survey will solicit locations of concern from a bike/pedestrian safety standpoint and will include a mapping component for stakeholders to indicate the locations of concern and desired improvement. The Data Collection will include: a. Gather and Review Traffic Data • Review IDOT's IROADS data • Collect 24-hour turning movement and classification traffic counts using Miovision Cameras. Assume up to 8 intersection counts will be completed. • Process 24-hour turning movement counts and develop existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Diagrams. b. Gather and Review Strava Data • Secure access for Village • Gather and review bicycle and pedestrian data c. GIS Field Inventory and Base Mapping • Review and record existing land use, streetscape conditions, and development issues in the field. September 8, 2023 -2- Exhibit A-1 • Complete corridor infrastructure assessment including utilities, existing traffic, parking, and pedestrian/bicycle facilities. d. Photolog — Perform an existing area reconnaissance and prepare a photolog documenting existing conditions, including challenges and opportunities. e. Supplemental Drone Data Collection — Collect topographic and aerial imagery data to supplement available data using drone capabilities. f. Crash Analysis • Gather and review 5 most recent years of pedestrian and bicycle crash data along all study corridors. • Provide recommendations for safety improvements. • Identify potential Highway Safety Improvement Project funding opportunities. • Evaluate Highway Safety Manual analysis for lane add and road diet corridors. g. Traffic Data Collection and Analysis — Complete A.M. and P.M. peak hour Synch ro/Si mTraffic analyses along the corridors to confirm feasibility of potential geometric improvements, including road diets. It is assumed all turning movement counts required for Synchro/SimTraffic analyses will be gathered through IROADS and Miovision data collection. h. Jurisdiction Review and Design Criteria • Establish required design criteria for each corridor. • Identify existing roadway jurisdictions and evaluate potential jurisdictional transfer. i. CAD Transportation Base Map Development • Develop existing conditions plans and base maps • Field verify base maps j. Prepare Existing Conditions Report Item 5 — Arterial Bike Network Alternatives — This task will include the following items: a. Field walk/ride with Village staff and Key Stakeholders b. Review and map all collected information c. Develop recommended Arterial Bike Network Improvements. Recommendations are to be provided on exhibits within the report as well as in CAD/GIS format. • Intersections (ped and bike crossings) • Mid -Block crossings • Facility entrances • Off-street multi -use path connections • On -street bike facilities • Connections to Neighborhood Bike Routes • Arterial bike network alignments d. Bike Corridor Concept Plans — Identify the potential for the following: • Right-of-way acquisition • Traffic signal improvements • Section 4(f) impacts • Structure and drainage improvements • Other design considerations that will aid in future project scoping e. Agency Coordination — Coordinate with the following Agencies: • IDOT — Includes preparation of Technical Memorandum and up to three revisions. September 8, 2023 -3- Exhibit A-1 • CCDOTH — Includes preparation of Technical Memorandum and up to three revisions. • Other pertinent agencies, including Pace, Railroads, Utilities. • Village coordination meeting to discuss impact of all agency comments. Item 6 — Implementation and Funding Strategy — The following items will be performed as part of this task: a. Develop Cost Estimates b. Conduct Prioritization and Phasing Analysis c. Provide recommended Funding Strategy d. Identify short, medium, and long-term goals. Item 7 — Draft Arterial Bike Network Study.— This task will include the following items: a. Draft Plan Development b. Coordination with Village Staff c. Incorporate Village and community feedback Item 8 — Final Arterial Bike Network Study — This task will include the following items: a. Final Plan Revisions b. Plan Adoption • Prepare PowerPoint Presentation • Present to Transportation Safety Commission and Village Board c. Prepare ESRI Story Map d. Plan Launch/Champion Workshop Item 9 - Supervision, Administration and Project Coordination — This item includes project setup, monthly invoicing and preparation of status reports, quarterly client coordination meetings as needed and in-house coordination meetings. It is assumed this project will be completed in 12 months, from the time Notice to Proceed is received. This item also includes implementation of Civiltech's quality control/quality assurance in-house review process. September 8, 2023 -4- Exhibit A-1 Illinois Department of Transportation EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAISE Local Public Agency County Section Number Village of Mount Prospect I lCook Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Prepared By Date Civiltech Engineering, Inc. I IJames R. TibOle, RE 1 191112023, Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number Civiltech Engineering, Inc.H -66-055-2, 3 Note: This is name of the consultant the CECS is being completed for. This name appears at the top of each tab. Remarks tillage of Mount Prospect - Arterial Bike Network Study PAYROLL ESCALATION TABLE CONTRACT TERM 12 MONTHS START DATE 9/20/2023 RAISE DATE 4/1/2024 END DATE 9/19/2024 ESCALATION PER YEAR Year First Date Last Date Months 0 9/20/2023 4/1/2024 1 4/2/2024 10/1/2024 OVERHEAD RATE 120.55°l° COMPLEXITY FACTOR 0 % OF RAISE % of Contract 6 50.00% 6 51.00% The total escalation = 1.00% BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) Printed 9/1/2023 8:54 AM ESCALATION Page 1 of 1 Local Public Agency County Section Number Villaae of Mount Prospect Cook Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number Civiltech Engineering, Inc. HPR-66-055-23 PAYROLL RATES EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAISE MAXIMUM PAYROLL RATEI 86.00 ESCALATION FACTORI 1.00% CLASSIFICATION IDOT PAYROLL RATES ON FILE CALCULATED RATE Senior Project Manager $75.00 $75.75 Senior Project Manager $65.00 $65.65 Project Manager 60.001 60.60 Engineer V $42.00 $42.42 Engineer III $36.00 $36.36 Planning Project Manager $60.00 $60.60 Planner II $45.00 $45.45 Planner 1 $40.00 $40.40 Senior Structural Engineer 85.001 85.85 Structural Engineer IV $50.00 $50.50 Water Resources Manager $85.00 $85.85 Drainage Engineer (Engineer V $42.00 $42.42 Urban Design and Planning Manager $75.00 $75.75 Traffic Project Manager $65.00 $65.65 Sr. Traffic Engineer (Engineer V) 56.001 $56.56 Traffic Engineer (Engineer IV $47.00 $47.47 Landca e Architect Manager $75.00 $75.75 Landscape Designer $45.00 $45.45 Digital Rendering Artist $55.00 $55.55 Design Technician $43.00 $43.43 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) Printed 9/1/2023 8:54 AM RATES Page 1 of 1 Local Public Aaen Village of Mount Prospect I Cook Section Number Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number Civiltech Engineering, Inc HPR-66-055-23 SUBCONSULTANTS EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET NAME Total Contribution to Direct Labor Total I Prime Consultant 0.00 NOTE: Only subconsultants who fill out a cost estimate that splits out direct labor may be listed on this sheet. 0.00 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) Printed 9/1/2023 8:54 AM SUBS Page 1 of 1 Print Page Local Public Agency County Section Number Village of Mount Prospect JCook Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number Civiltech Engineering, Inc. HPR-66-055-23 DIRECT COSTS WORKSHEET List ALL direct costs required for this project. Those not listed on the form will not be eligible for reimbursement by the LPA on this project. EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET ITEM ALLOWABLE QUANTITY CONTRACT RATE TOTAL Lodging (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD) Actual Cost (Up to state rate maximum $0.00 Lodging Taxes and Fees (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Actual Cost $0.00 Air Fare Coach rate, actual cost, requires minimum two weeks' notice, with prior IDOT approval $0.00 Vehicle Mileage (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Up to state rate maximum 216 $0.66 $141.48 Vehicle Owned or Leased $32.50/half day (4 hours or less) or $65/full day $0.00 Vehicle Rental Actual Cost (Up to $55/day) $0.00 Tolls Actual Cost $0.00 Parking Actual Cost $0.00 Overtime Premium portion (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Shift Differential Actual Cost (Based on firm's policy) $0.00 Overnight Delivery/Postage/Courier Service Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (In-house) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (Outside) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Project Specific Insurance Actual Cost $0.00 Monuments (Permanent) Actual Cost $0.00 Photo Processing Actual Cost $0.00 2 -Way Radio (Survey or Phase III Only) Actual Cost $0.00 Telephone Usage (Traffic System Monitoring Only) Actual Cost $0.00 CADD Actual Cost (Max $15/hour) $0.00 Web Site Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 1 $550.00 $550.00 Advertisements Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 4 $125.00 $500.00 Public Meeting Facility Rental Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Public Meeting Exhibits/Renderings & Equipment Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 1 $500.00 $500.00 Recording Fees Actual Cost $0.00 Transcriptions (specific to project) Actual Cost $0.00 Courthouse Fees Actual Cost $0.00 Storm Sewer Cleaning and Televising Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Traffic Control and Protection Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Aerial Photography and Mapping Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Utliity Exploratory Trenching Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Testing of Soil Samples Actual Cost $0.00 Lab Services Actual Cost (Provide breakdown of each cost) $0.00 Equipment and/or Specialized Equipment Rental Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Miovision Traffic Data Processing - signalized Actual Cost 8 $406.80 $3,254.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 d 9/1/2023 8:55 AM TOTAL DIRECT COSTS: k $4,9451111 09/23 OST£ Local Public Agency Village of Mount Prospect Consultant / Subconsultant Name Civiltech Engineering, Inc. Count Cook COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET OVERHEAD RATE 1 120.55% COMPLEXITY FACTORI 0 Section Number Job Number HPR-66-055-23 DIRECT COSTS (not included in TASK row totals) STAFF HOURS PAYROLL OVERHEAD & FRINGE BENEFITS SERVICES BY FIXED FEE OTHERS TOTAL % OF GRAND TOTAL Detailed Work Plan and Strategy 140 8,013 9,660 2,644 20,317 5.82% Review of Existing Documents 142 6,547 7,892 2,160 16,599 4.75% Outreach Strategy 1,597 428 22,547 27,181 7,441 57,169 16.36% Data Collection 3,302 618 27,452 33,093 9,059 69,604 19.92% Arterial Bike Network Alternatives 47 522 25,767 31,062 8,503 65,332 18.70% Implementation and Funding Strategy 350 17,717 21,358 5,847 44,922 12.86% Draft Arterial Network Study 1 230 10,985 13,242 3,625 27,852 7.97% Final Arterial Network Study 1 138 7,173 8,647 2,367 18,187 5.21% Supervision, Administration, and Project Coordination 164 9,631 11,611 3,178 24,420 6.99% Subconsultant DL Direct Costs Total =__> $4,945.88 TOTALS 1 27321 135,832 1 163,746 1 44,824 1 -1 $0.00 $4,945.88 349,348 1.42% 100.00% 299,578 Printed 9/1/2023 8:55 AM Page 1 of 1 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) COST EST Local Public Agency Villaae of Mount Prosaect Consultant / Subconsultant Name Civiltech Engineering, Inc. Count Cook AVERAGE HOURLY PROJECT RATES EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET SHEET Section Number Job Number HPR-66-055-23 OF 2 PAYROLL CLASSIFICATION AVG HOURLY RATES TOTAL PROJ. RATES Hours % Part. Wgtd Avg Detailed Work Plan and Strategy Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Review of Existing Documents Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Outreach Strategy Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Data Collection Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Arterial Bike Network Alternatives Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Senior Project Manager 75.75 42.0 1.54% 1.16 2 1.43% 1.08 0 0 6 0.97% 0.74 6 1.15% 0.87 Senior Project Manager 65.65 236.0 8.64% 5.67 30 21.43% 14.07 12 8.45% 5.55 1 60 14.02% 9.20 20 3.24% 2.12 30 5.75% 3.77 Project Manager 60.60 78.0 2.86% 1.73 0 0 0 4 0.65% 0.39 14 2.68% 1.63 Engineer V 42.42 308.0 11.27% 1 4.78 14 10.00% 4.24 20 1 14.08% 5.97 0 80 12.94% 5.49 72 13.79% 5.85 Engineer III 36.36 518.0 18.96% 6.89 6 4.29% 1.56 24 16.90% 6.15 0 216 34.95% 12.71 132 25.29% 9.19 Planning Project Manager 60.60 352.0 12.88% 7.81 30 21.43% 12.99 14 9.86% 5.97 128 29.91% 18.12 12 1.94% 1.18 44 8.43% 5.11 Planner II 45.45 366.0 13.40% 6.09 16 11.43% 5.19 32 22.54% 10.24 104 24.30% 11.04 34 5.50% 2.50 68 13.03% 5.92 Planner 1 40.40 264.0 9.66% 3.90 16 11.43% 4.62 16 11.27% 4.55 96 22.43% 9.06 60 9.71% 3.92 0 Senior Structural Engineer 85.85 8.0 0.29% 0.25 0 0 0 0 4 0.77% 0.66 Structural Engineer IV 50.50 20.0 0.73% 0.37 0 0 0 0 8 1.53% 0.77 Water Resources Manager 85.85 6.0 0.22% 0.19 0 0 0 0 2 0.38% 0.33 Drainage Engineer (EnginE 42.42 20.0 0.73% 0.31 0 0 0 0 8 1.53% 0.65 Urban Design and Planninc 75.75 48.0 1.76% 1.33 12 8.57% 6.49 0 0 0 12 2.30% 1.74 Traffic Project Manager 65.65 60.0 2.20% 1.44 8 5.71% 3.75 0 0 14 2.27% 1.49 12 2.30% 1.51 Sr. Traffic Engineer (Engin( 56.56 72.0 2.64% 1.49 0 2 1.41% 0.80 24 5.61% 3.17 26 4.21% 2.38 12 2.30% 1.30 Traffic Engineer (Engineer 47.47 92.0 3.37% 1.60 0 4 2.82% 1.34 0 60 9.71% 4.61 16 3.07% 1.46 Landcape Architect Manag 75.75 46.0 1.68% 1.28 6 4.29% 3.25 0 0 0 26 4.98% 3.77 Landscape Designer 45.45 74.0 2.71% 1.23 0 2 1.41% 0.64 1 0 20 3.24% 1.47 44 8.43% 3.83 Digital Rendering Artist 55.55 56.0 2.05% 1.14 0 0 16 3.74% 2.08 40 6.47% 3.60 0 Design Technician 43.43 66.0 2.42% 1.05 0 16 11.27% 4.89 0 26 4.21% 1.83 12 2.30% 1.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS i 2732.0 100% $49.72 140.0 100.00% $57.24 142.0 100% $46.10 428.0 100% $52.68 618.0 100% $44.42 522.0 100% 1 $49.36 Printed 9/1/2023 8:55 AM Page 1 of 1 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) AVG 1 Local Public Agency Village of Mount Prospect Consultant / Subconsultant Name Civiltech Engineering, Inc. Count Cook AVERAGE HOURLY PROJECT RATES EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET Section Number Job Number HPR-66-055-23 SHEET 2 OF PAYROLL CLASSIFICATION AVG HOURLY RATES Implementation and Funding Strategy Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Draft Arterial Network Study Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Final Arterial Network Study Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Administration, and Project Coordination Hours % Wgtd Hours Part. Avg % Wgtd Hours % Wgtd Part. Avg Part. Avg Senior Project Manager 75.75 4 1.14% 0.87 2 0.87% 0.66 2 1.45% 1.10 1 20 12.20% 9.24 Senior Project Manager 65.65 30 8.57% 5.63 8 3.48% 2.28 12 8.70% 5.71 34 20.73% 13.61 Project Manager 60.60 20 5.71% 3.46 4 1.74% 1.05 12 8.70% 5.27 24 14.63% 8.87 Engineer 42.42 52 14.86% 6.30 26 11.30% 4.80 12 8.70% 3.69 32 19.51% 8.28 Engineer III 36.36 72 20.57% 7.48 40 17.39% 6.32 16 11.59% 4.22 12 7.32% 2.66 Planning Project Manager 60.60 36 10.29% 6.23 44 19.13% 11.59 12 8.70% 5.27 32 19.51% 11.82 Planner II 45.45 32 9.14% 4.16 48 20.87% 9.49 32 23.19% 10.54 0 Planner 1 40.40 20 5.71% 2.31 40 17.39% 7.03 16 11.59% 4.68 0 Senior Structural Engineer 85.85 4 1.14% 0.98 0 0 0 Structural Engineer IV 50.50 12 3.43% 1.73 0 0 0 Water Resources Manager 85.85 4 1.14% 0.98 0 0 0 Drainage Engineer (Engineer 42.42 12 3.43% 1.45 0 0 0 Urban Design and Planning N 75.75 16 4.57% 3.46 0 8 5.80% 4.39 0 Traffic Project Manager 65.65 4 1.14% 0.75 6 2.61% 1.71 10 7.25% 4.76 6 3.66% 2.40 Sr. Traffic Engineer (Engineei 56.56 8 2.29% 1.29 0 0 0 Traffic Engineer (Engineer IV 47.47 12 3.43% 1.63 0 0 0 Landcape Architect Manager 75.75 4 1.14% 0.87 4 1.74% 1.32 2 1.45% 1.10 4 2.44% 1.85 Landscape Designer 45.45 8 2.29% 1.04 0 0 0 Digital Rendering Artist 55.55 0 0 0 0 Design Technician 43.43 0 8 3.48% 1.51 4 2.90% 1.26 0 TOTALS 350.0 100% $50.62 230.0 100% $47.76 138.0 100% $51.98 164.0 100% $58.730.0 0% $0.00 0.0 0% $0.00 Printed 9/1/2023 8:56 AM BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) Page 1 of 1 AVG 2 Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect WORKHOUR ESTIMATE 2 Review of E isting Documents A. Collect and review previous Local and Regional studies and existing roadway plans and documents related to bicycle routing and infrastructure. Personnel & Hours 8 Item Task I Senior Project Project Design Design Planning 4 8 Sr.hase Structural Sr. [ No. Department Project Manager Engineer Engineer Technician Project Planner 11 Planner I Structural Engineer Drainage E 0 20 Head Manager 32 16 0 0 0 Manager Engineer Engineer 3 Outreach Strategy 4 24 64 4 2 8 A. Finalize Community Engagement Plan 1 Detailed Work Plan and Strategy 4 B. Prepare and update project website 4 8 16 A. Preparation for and attendance at project Kick-off Meeting with Village representatives 8 2 2 20 2 4 4 8 8 B. Preparation for and attendance at regular Village Update Meetings, assume 6 meetings. 2 12 12 6 12 6 6 4 1 80 Preparation of Detailed Work Plan and Strategy Memo, including project schedule and exhibits. 8 16 8 F. Pre are for and attend Public Meeting#2 12 24 24 C. This includes two revisions based on reviews from the Village. for and attend Pop-up Meetings. G. Pre ar'Fr; 2 8 6 6 Sub -total Item 3 0 60 Preparation of Project Management/Communication Plan. Includes one revision based on 0 0 128 104 96 0 0 0 D. Village comments. 6 4 Preparation of Preliminary Community Engagement Plan. Includes one revision based on Villag E. comments. 8 4 Sub -total Item 11 2 30 0 14 6 0 30 16 16 0 0 0 2 Review of E isting Documents A. Collect and review previous Local and Regional studies and existing roadway plans and documents related to bicycle routing and infrastructure. 2 8 8 2 8 8 B. Collect and review Local and regional data sets. 2 4 8 16 4 8 8 C. Create inventory matrix and exhibits of all key findings. 8 8 8 8 16 16 Sub -total Item 2 0 12 0 20 24 16 14 32 16 0 0 0 Supplemental Drone Data Collection — Collect existing topographic and aerial imagery data E. using drone capabilities. 3 Outreach Strategy 4 24 64 4 2 8 A. Finalize Community Engagement Plan 4 4 B. Prepare and update project website 4 8 16 4 8 8 C. Prepare for and attend Key Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Group Meetings 20 16 56 40 8 8 D. Prepare for and attend Public Meeting #1 12 4 20 40 24 24 24 E. Prepare and administer Community Survey and GIS -based Interactive Map 4 1 80 1 216 1 8 16 8 F. Pre are for and attend Public Meeting#2 12 24 24 24 for and attend Pop-up Meetings. G. Pre ar'Fr; 12 24 24 24 Sub -total Item 3 0 60 0 0 0 0 128 104 96 0 0 0 4 Data Collection A. Gather and Review Traffic Data 2 4 16 8 B. Gather and Review Strava Data C. GIS Field Inventory and Base Mapping 2 4 16 4 16 16 Photolog — Perform an existing area reconnaissance and prepare a photolog documenting D. existing conditions, including challenges and opportunities. 4 8 4 8 Supplemental Drone Data Collection — Collect existing topographic and aerial imagery data E. using drone capabilities. F. Crash Analysis 2 4 24 64 4 2 8 G. Traffic Data Collection and Analysis — Complete Synchro/SimTraffic analysis along the corridors to confirm feasibility of potential geometric improvements, including road diets. It is assumed all turning movement counts required for Synchro/SimTraffic analysis will be gathered through IROADS and Miovision data collection. H. Jurisdiction Review and Design Criteria 2 4 8 16 2 I. CAD Transportation Base Map Development 4 16 56 12 4 8 16 J. Preparation of Existing Conditions Report 2 4 4 20 40 4 4 12 Sub -total Item 41 4 1 80 1 216 1 26 1 12 1 34 1 60 1 0 1 0 0 Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect WORKHOUR ESTIMATE Item PhaseI Senior Planning No Task Department Project Project Project Design Design project Head Manager Manager Engineer Engineer Technician Manager Personnei a Hours Sr Sr. Planner II Planner I Structural Structural Drainage Engineer Engineer Engineer 5 Arterial Bike Network Alternatives A. Project Setup, Monthly invoicing, and preparation of status reports. 2 8 12 12 A. Final Plan Revisions 2 4 4 12 16 4 8 12 16 B. Plan Adoption 4 4 4 C. Prepare ESRI Story Map A. Field walk/ride with Village staff and Key Stakeholders 4 D. Plan Launch/Champion Workshop 4 4 4 4 4 12 12 16 4 12 32 16 0 0 0 B. Review and mapping of all collected information 2 2 8 24 C. Development of recommended Arterial Bike Network Improvements 2 4 4 14 40 16 24 4 8 2 D. Bike Corridor Concept Plans 2 8 8 40 80 12 8 16 E. Agency Coordination 2 12 2 12 12 8 Sub -total Item 5 6 30 14 72 132 12 44 68 0 4 8 2 6 Im lementation and Funding Strategy A. Develop Cost Estimates 2 6 8 24 72 4 12 4 B. Prioritization and Phasing Analysis 4 16 16 C. Provide recommended Funding Strategy 2 12 12 12 12 4 4 D. Identify short, medium, and long-term goals. 8 16 8 12 16 Sub -total Item 6 4 30 20 52 72 0 36 32 20 4 12 4 7 Draft Arterial Network Study Draft aft Plan Develo ment 2 4 4 20 32 4 40 40 32 B. Coordination of Village Staff 2 2 2 2 C. Incor orate Village and community feedback 2 4 8 2 2 8 8 Subdotal Item 7 2 8 4 26 40 8 44 48 40 0 0 0 8 Final Arterial Network Stud A. Project Setup, Monthly invoicing, and preparation of status reports. 2 8 12 12 A. Final Plan Revisions 2 4 4 12 16 4 8 12 16 B. Plan Adoption 4 4 4 C. Prepare ESRI Story Map 16 D. Plan Launch/Champion Workshop 4 4 4 Sub -total Item 8 2 12 12 12 16 4 12 32 16 0 0 0 9 Supervision, Administration, and Project Coordination A. Project Setup, Monthly invoicing, and preparation of status reports. 2 8 12 12 B. Quarterly client coordination meetings. 8 8 8 C. In-house coordination meetings. 6 6 12 12 12 12 D. Quality Control/Quality Assurance in-house review process 12 12 12 Sub -total Item 9 20 34 24 32 12 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hours:1 42 1 236 1 78 1 308 1 518 1 66 1 352 1 366 1 264 1 8 1 20 1 6 %of Hours:1 1.5% 1 8.6% 1 2.9% 1 11.3% 1 19.0% 1 2.4% 1 12.9% 1 13.4% 1 9.7% 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 1 0.2% DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Illinois Department of Transportation ❑ Under $250,000 ® Over $250,000 Bucksheet Reset Form Office District / CO Bureau Planning & Programming CO —11 Planning File Subject Amount Ran e Agreement, Signature 280,000.00 Secretary Explanation Subject lExecutive Signatures for Grant Execution in Relation to Priority Normal Statewide Planning and Research Funds / 494-00-1439 1 Description of Action Planning -Arterial Bike Network Study -Village of Mount Prospect DBE Goal ❑ IL Works ❑ Capitol/Stimulus ❑ Notary Required None I FY Deadline Fiscal Year Date Consultant Name/Contractor Letting Date N/A County District Job Number PTB -Item Cook N/A N/A Amount of Agreement Route 280000.00 11 Section Phase Contract Number A reement Number N/A N/A H2MT(336) 23-1439-38782 State Dollars Federal Dollars Local Dollars Total Dollars 280000.00 70000.00 350000.00 Source of State Fund % Reimburse from Feds 494-00-1439 80.00000000 % Copy of the Fully Executed Agreement " 23-1439-38782" will be sent to the program area, the program area ill provided the grantee "Village of Mount Prospect" a copy of the fully executed agreement along with the porting requirements. Completed 03/29/2023 OS 500 (Rev. 12/07/21) DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 GRANT AGREEMENT � 111 ry ,„a r C �Hv 4d BETWEEN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT The Illinois Department of Transportation (Grantor) with its principal office at 2300 South Dirksen Parkway, Springfield, IL 62764 and Village of Mount Prospect (Grantee) with its principal office at 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 and payment address (if different than principal office) at Same hereby enter into this Grant Agreement (Agreement). Grantor and Grantee are collectively referred to herein as "Parties" or individually as a "Party." PART ONE - THE UNIFORM TERMS RECITALS WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Parties to perform consistent with all Exhibits and attachments hereto and pursuant to the duties and responsibilities imposed by Grantor under the laws of the State of Illinois ("State") and in accordance with the terms, conditions and provisions hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the value, receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE I AWARD AND GRANTEE SPECIFIC INFORMATION AND CERTIFICATION 1.1 DUNS Number, SAM Registration: Nature of Entity. Under penalties of perjury, Grantee certifies that 069507697 is Grantee's correct DUNS Number, D5HGKASDDZ14 is Grantee's correct UEI, if applicable; Grantee has an active State registration and SAM registration; and 366006011 is Grantee's correct FEIN or Social Security Number. Grantee further certifies, if applicable: (a) that Grantee is not subject to backup withholding because (i) Grantee is exempt from backup withholding, or (ii) Grantee has not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that Grantee is subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or (iii) the IRS has notified Grantee that Grantee is no longer subject to backup withholding; and (b) Grantee is a U.S. citizen or other U.S. person. Grantee is doing business as a (check one): ❑ Individual ❑ Pharmacy -Non Corporate ❑ Sole Proprietorship ❑ Pharmacy/Funeral Home/Cemetery Corp. ❑ Partnership ❑ Tax Exempt ❑ Corporation (includes Not for Profit) ❑ Limited Liability Company (select applicable ❑ Medical Corporation tax classification) ® Governmental Unit ❑ P = partnership ❑ Estate or Trust ❑ C = corporation If Grantee has not received a payment from the State of Illinois in the last two years, Grantee must submit a W-9 tax form with this Agreement. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 1 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 1.2 Amount of Agreement. Grant Funds (check one) ® shall not exceed or ❑ are estimated to be $280,000.00 , of which $280,000.00 are federal funds. Grantee agrees to accept Grantor's payment as specified in the Exhibits and attachments incorporated herein as part of this agreement. 1.3 Identification Numbers. If applicable, the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) is H2MT(336) the federal awarding agency is Federal H and the federal award date is 07/01/22 Administration If applicable, the Assistance Listing Program Title is Highway Planning & Construction and the Assistance Listing Number is 20.205 The Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA) Number is 494-00-1439 , and the CSFA Name isStatewide Planning and Research Funds (SPR) The State Award Identification Number is 1439-38782 1.4 12/31/2024 Term. This Agreement shall be effective on 01/01/2023 and shall expire on (the "Term"), unless terminated pursuant to the Agreement. 1.5 Certification. Grantee certifies under oath that (1) all representations made in this Agreement are true and correct and (2) all Grant Funds awarded pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for the purpose(s) described herein. Grantee acknowledges that the Award is made solely upon this certification and that any false statements, misinterpretations, or material omissions shall be the basis for immediate termination of this Agreement and repayment of all Grant Funds. THE REST OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 2 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 1.6 Signatures. In witness whereof, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. ❑ Check if under $250,000. If under $250,000 the Secretary's signature may be delegated. Illinoi t of Transportation Signature R"d er man, Secretary of Transportation By: Signature of Designee Date: 4/12/2023 1 12:15 PM CDT Printed Name: Printed Title: Designee DocuSigned by: By: G�C�� -Q�"-.- Signature o angsu irri; Chief Counsel By Date: 4/11/2023 Printed Name: _ Printed Title: Signature of Designee 1 3:52 PM CDT Designee By:FDocuSigned by: D,,;,� Signature o is i i son, Chief Financial Officer By: Si nature of Designee Date: 4/12/2023 1 x/.14 AM CDT Printed Name: Printed Title: Designee DocuSigned by: F1;',/,(�,-j_-f By:.... .. Signature of Holly Bieneman, Director of OPP By: Signature of Designee Date: 4/11/2023 1 4:15 PM CDT Printed Name: Printed Title: Designee By: Signature of Fourth Other Approver's Name and Title Date: Printed Name: Printed Title: Villa dUmWgd7rospect By: Signature of Authorized Representative Date: 4/11/2023 1 1:18 PM PDT Printed Name: Amit Thakkar Printed Title: CFO, Fiscal Officer, Compliance Officer Email: athakkar@mountprospect.org By: Signature of Authorized Representative Date: Printed Name: Printed Title: Email: Designee State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 3 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 ARTICLE II REQUIRED REPRESENTATIONS 2.1 Standing and Authority. Grantee warrants that: (a) Grantee is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing, if applicable under the laws of the state in which it was incorporated or organized. (b) Grantee has the requisite power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and all documents to be executed by it in connection with this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. (c) If Grantee is organized under the laws of another jurisdiction, Grantee warrants that it is also duly qualified to do business in Illinois and, if applicable, is in good standing with the Illinois Secretary of State. (d) The execution and delivery of this Agreement, and the other documents to be executed by Grantee in connection with this Agreement, and the performance by Grantee of its obligations hereunder have been duly authorized by all necessary entity action. (e) This Agreement and all other documents related to this Agreement, including the Uniform Grant Application, the Exhibits and attachments to which Grantee is a party constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Grantee enforceable against Grantee in accordance with their respective terms. 2.2 Compliance with Internal Revenue Code. Grantee certifies that it does and will comply with all provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code (26 USC 1), the Illinois Revenue Act (35 ILCS 5), and all rules promulgated thereunder, including withholding provisions and timely deposits of employee taxes and unemployment insurance taxes. 2.3 Compliance with Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006. Grantee certifies that it does and will comply with the reporting requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-282) (FFATA) with respect to Federal Awards greater than or equal to $30,000. A FFATA sub -award report must be filed by the end of the month following the month in which the award was made. 2.4 Compliance with Uniform Grant Rules (2 CFR Part 200). Grantee certifies that it shall adhere to the applicable Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements, which are published in Title 2, Part 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations, ("2 CFR Part 200"), and are incorporated herein by reference. 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.40(c)(1)(A). The requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 apply to the Grant Funds awarded through this Agreement, regardless of whether the original source of the funds is State or federal, unless an exception is noted in federal or State statutes or regulations. 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.10(c)(8); 30 ILCS 708/5(b). 2.5 Compliance with Registration Requirements. Grantee certifies that it: (i) is registered with the federal SAM; (ii) is in good standing with the Illinois Secretary of State, if applicable; (iii) has a valid DUNS Number; (iv) has a valid UEI, if applicable; and (v) has successfully completed the annual registration and prequalification through the Grantee Portal. It is Grantee's responsibility to remain current with these registrations and requirements. If Grantee's status with regard to any of these requirements changes, or the certifications made in and information provided in the Uniform Grant Application changes, Grantee must notify the Grantor in accordance with ARTICLE XVIII. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 4 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 ARTICLE III Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Definitions. Capitalized words and phrases used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in 2 CFR 200.1 unless otherwise stated below. "Agreement" or "Grant Agreement" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Allowable Costs" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Award" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Budget" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Catalog of State Financial Assistance" or "CSFA" has the same meaning as in 44 III.Admin.Code 7000.30. "Close-out Report" means a report from the Grantee allowing the Grantor to determine whether all applicable administrative actions and required work have been completed, and therefore closeout actions can commence. "Conflict of Interest" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Direct Costs" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Disallowed Costs" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "DUNS Number" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Financial Assistance" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Fixed -Rate" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code. 7000.30. "Fixed -Rate" is in contrast to fee-for-service, 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "GATU" means the Grant Accountability and Transparency Unit within the Governor's Office of Management and Budget. "Grant Funds" means the Financial Assistance made available to Grantee through this Agreement. "Grantee Portal" has the same meaning as in 44 III.Admin. Code 7000.30. "Indirect Costs" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Indirect Cost Rate" means a device for determining in a reasonable manner the proportion of indirect costs each Program should bear. It is a ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the Indirect Costs to a Direct Cost base. If reimbursement of Indirect Costs is allowable under an Award, Grantor will not reimburse those Indirect Costs unless Grantee has established an Indirect Cost Rate covering the applicable activities and period of time, unless Indirect Costs are reimbursed at a fixed rate. "Indirect Cost Rate Proposal" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Obligations" has the same meaning as in 44 III.Admin. Code 7000.30. "Period of Performance" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Prior Approval" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Profit" means an entity's total revenue less its operating expenses, interest paid, depreciation, and taxes. "Profit" is synonymous with the term "net revenue." "Program" means the services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. "Program Costs" means all Allowable Costs incurred by Grantee and the value of the contributions made by third parties in accomplishing the objectives of the Award during the Term of this Agreement. "Related Parties" has the meaning set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 850-10-20. "SAM" means the federal System for Award Management (SAM), the federal repository into which an entity must provide information required for the conduct of business as a recipient. "Unallowable Costs" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. "Unique Entity Identifier" or "UEI" has the same meaning as in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.30. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 5 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 ARTICLE IV PAYMENT Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 4.1 Availability of Appropriation: Sufficiency of Funds. This Agreement is contingent upon and subject to the availability of sufficient funds. Grantor may terminate or suspend this Agreement, in whole or in part, without penalty or further payment being required, if (i) sufficient funds for this Agreement have not been appropriated or otherwise made available to the Grantor by the State or the federal funding source, (ii) the Governor or Grantor reserves funds, or (iii) the Governor or Grantor determines that funds will not or may not be available for payment. Grantor shall provide notice, in writing, to Grantee of any such funding failure and its election to terminate or suspend this Agreement as soon as practicable. Any suspension or termination pursuant to this Section will be effective upon the date of the written notice unless otherwise indicated. 4.2. Pre -Award Costs. Pre -award costs are not permitted unless specifically authorized by the Grantor in Exhibit A, PART TWO, or PART THREE of this Agreement. If they are authorized, pre -award costs must be charged to the initial Budget Period of the Award, unless otherwise specified by the Grantor. 2 CFR 200.458. 4.3 Return of Grant Funds. Any Grant Funds remaining that are not expended or legally obligated by Grantee, including those funds obligated pursuant to ARTICLE XVII, at the end of the Agreement period, or in the case of capital improvement Awards at the end of the time period Grant Funds are available for expenditure or obligation, shall be returned to Grantor within forty-five (45) days. A Grantee who is required to reimburse Grant Funds and who enters into a deferred payment plan for the purpose of satisfying a past due debt, shall be required to pay interest on such debt as required by Section 10.2 of the Illinois State Collection Act of 1986. 30 ILCS 210; 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.450(c). In addition, as required by 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.440(b)(2), unless granted a written extension, Grantee must liquidate all obligations incurred under the Award at the end of the period of performance. 4.4 Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990. Unless notified otherwise in PART TWO or PART THREE, federal funds received under this Agreement shall be managed in accordance with the Cash Management Improvement Act of 1990 (31 USC 6501 et seq.) and any other applicable federal laws or regulations. 2 CFR 200.305; 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.120. 4.5 Payments to Third Parties. Grantee agrees that Grantor shall have no liability to Grantee when Grantor acts in good faith to redirect all or a portion of any Grantee payment to a third party. Grantor will be deemed to have acted in good faith when it is in possession of information that indicates Grantee authorized Grantor to intercept or redirect payments to a third party or when so ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. 4.6 Modifications to Estimated Amount. If the Agreement amount is established on an estimated basis, then it may be increased by mutual agreement at any time during the Term. Grantor may decrease the estimated amount of this Agreement at any time during the Term if (i) Grantor believes Grantee will not use the funds during the Term, (ii) Grantor believes Grantee has used funds in a manner that was not authorized by this Agreement, (iii) sufficient funds for this Agreement have not been appropriated or otherwise made available to the Grantor by the State or the federal funding source, (iv) the Governor or Grantor reserves funds, or (v) the Governor or Grantor determines that funds will or may not be available for payment. Grantee will be notified, in writing, of any adjustment of the estimated amount of this Agreement. In the event of such reduction, services provided by Grantee under Exhibit A may be reduced accordingly. Grantee shall be paid for work satisfactorily performed prior to the date of the notice regarding adjustment. 2 CFR 200.308. 4.7 Interest. (a) All interest earned on Grant Funds held by a Grantee shall be treated in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305(b)(9), unless otherwise provided in PART TWO or PART THREE. Any amount due shall be remitted annually in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305(b)(9) or. to the Grantor, as applicable. (b) Grant Funds shall be placed in an insured account, whenever possible, that bears interest, unless exempted under 2 CFR 200.305(b)(8). State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 6 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 4.8 Timely Billing Required. Grantee must submit any payment request to Grantor within fifteen (15) days of the end of the quarter, unless another billing schedule is specified in PART TWO , PART THREE, or Exhibit C. Failure to submit such payment request timely will render the amounts billed an unallowable cost which Grantor cannot reimburse. In the event that Grantee is unable, for good cause, to submit its payment request timely, Grantee shall timely notify Grantor and may request an extension of time to submit the payment request. Grantor's approval of Grantee's request for an extension shall not be unreasonably withheld. 4.9 Certification. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.415, each invoice and report submitted by Grantee (or sub -grantee) must contain the following certification by an official authorized to legally bind the Grantee (or sub -grantee): By signing this report [or payment request or both], I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report [or payment request] is true, complete, and accurate; that the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the State or federal pass-through award; and that supporting documentation has been submitted as required by the grant agreement. I acknowledge that approval for any other expenditures described herein shall be considered conditional subject to further review and verification in accordance with the monitoring and records retention provisions of the grant agreement. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729-3730 and 3801-3812; 30 ILCS 708/120). ARTICLE V SCOPE OF GRANT ACTIVITIES/PURPOSE OF GRANT 5.1 Scope of Grant Activities/Purpose of Grant. Grantee will conduct the Grant Activities or provide the services as described in the Exhibits and attachments, including Exhibit A (Project Description) and Exhibit B (Deliverables), incorporated herein and in accordance with all terms and conditions set forth herein and all applicable administrative rules. In addition, the State's Notice of State Award (44 III. Admin. Code 7000.360) is incorporated herein by reference. All Grantor -specific provisions and programmatic reporting required under this Agreement are described in PART TWO (The Grantor -Specific Terms). All Project -specific provisions and reporting required under this Agreement are described in PART THREE. 5.2 Scope Revisions. Grantee shall obtain Prior Approval from Grantor whenever a scope revision is necessary for one or more of the reasons enumerated in 2 CFR 200.308. All requests for scope revisions that require Grantor approval shall be signed by Grantee's authorized representative and submitted to Grantor for approval. Expenditure of funds under a requested revision is prohibited and will not be reimbursed if expended before Grantor gives written approval. 2 CFR 200.308. 5.3 Specific Conditions. If applicable, specific conditions required after a risk assessment will be included in Exhibit G. Grantee shall adhere to the specific conditions listed therein. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 7 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 ARTICLE VI BUDGET Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 6.1 Budget. The Budget is a schedule of anticipated grant expenditures that is approved by Grantor for carrying out the purposes of the Award. When Grantee or third parties support a portion of expenses associated with the Award, the Budget includes the non-federal as well as the federal share (and State share if applicable) of grant expenses. The Budget submitted by Grantee at application, or a revised Budget subsequently submitted and approved by Grantor, is considered final and is incorporated herein by reference. 6.2 Budget Revisions. Grantee shall obtain Prior Approval from Grantor whenever a Budget revision is necessary for one or more of the reasons enumerated in 2 CFR 200.308 or 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.370(b). All requests for Budget revisions that require Grantor approval shall be signed by Grantee's authorized representative and submitted to Grantor for approval. Expenditure of funds under a requested revision is prohibited and will not be reimbursed if expended before Grantor gives written approval. 6.3 Notification. Within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of receipt of the request for Budget revisions, Grantor will review the request and notify Grantee whether the Budget revision has been approved, denied, or the date upon which a decision will be reached. ARTICLE VII ALLOWABLE COSTS 7.1 Allowability of Costs; Cost Allocation Methods. The allowability of costs and cost allocation methods for work performed under this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E and Appendices III, IV, V, and VII. 7.2 Indirect Cost Rate Submission. (a) All grantees, except for Local Education Agencies (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1), must make an Indirect Cost Rate election in the Grantee Portal, even grantees that do not charge or expect to charge Indirect Costs. 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.420(e). (i) Waived and de minimis Indirect Cost Rate elections will remain in effect until the Grantee elects a different option. (b) Grantee must submit an Indirect Cost Rate Proposal in accordance with federal and State regulations, in a format prescribed by Grantor. For grantees who have never negotiated an Indirect Cost Rate before, the Indirect Cost Rate Proposal must be submitted for approval no later than three months after the effective date of the Award. For grantees who have previously negotiated an Indirect Cost Rate, the Indirect Cost Rate Proposal must be submitted for approval within 180 days of the Grantee's fiscal year end, as dictated in the applicable appendices, such as: (i) Appendix V and VII to 2 CFR Part 200 governs Indirect Cost Rate Proposals for state and local governments. (ii) Appendix III to 2 CFR Part 200 governs Indirect Cost Rate Proposals for public and private institutions of higher education. (iii) Appendix IV to 2 CFR Part 200 governs Indirect (F&A) Costs Identification and Assignment, and Rate Determination for Nonprofit Organizations, and (iv) Appendix V to 2 CFR Part 200 governs state/Local Governmentwide Central Service Cost Allocation Plans. (c) A grantee who has a current, applicable rate negotiated by a cognizant federal agency shall provide to Grantor a copy of its Indirect Cost Rate acceptance letter from the federal government and a copy of all documentation regarding the allocation methodology for costs used to negotiate that rate, e.g., without limitation, the State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 8 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 cost policy statement or disclosure narrative statement. Grantor will accept that Indirect Cost Rate, up to any statutory, rule- based or programmatic limit. (d) A grantee who does not have a current negotiated rate, may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs which may be used indefinitely. No documentation is required to justify the 10% Indirect Cost Rate. 2 CFR 200.414(f). 7.3 Transfer of Costs. Cost transfers between Grants, whether as a means to compensate for cost overruns or for other reasons, are unallowable. 2 CFR 200.451. 7.4 Higher Education Cost Principles. The federal cost principles that apply to public and private institutions of higher education are set forth in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E and Appendix III. 7.5 Nonprofit Organizations Cost Principles. The federal cost principles that apply to Nonprofit Organizations that are not institutions of higher education are set forth in 2 CFR Part 200 subpart E, unless exempt under 2 CFR Part 200 Appendix VIII. 7.6 Government Cost Principles. The federal cost principles that apply to state, local and federally -recognized Indian tribal governments are set forth in 2 CFR Part 200 subpart E, Appendix V, and Appendix VII. 7.7 Commercial Organization Cost Principles. The federal cost principles and procedures for cost analysis and the determination, negotiation and allowance of costs that apply to commercial organizations are set forth in 48 CFR Part 31. 7.8 Financial Management Standards. The financial management systems of Grantee must meet the following standards: (a) Accounting System. Grantee organizations must have an accounting system that provides accurate, current, and complete disclosure of all financial transactions related to each state -and federally -funded Program. Accounting records must contain information pertaining to state and federal pass-through awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, outlays, and income. These records must be maintained on a current basis and balanced at least quarterly. Cash contributions to the Program from third parties must be accounted for in the general ledger with other Grant Funds. Third party in-kind (non-cash) contributions are not required to be recorded in the general ledger, but must be under accounting control, possibly through the use of a memorandum ledger. To comply with 2 CFR 200.305(b)(7)(i) and 30 ILCS 708/520, Grantee shall use reasonable efforts to ensure that funding streams are delineated within Grantee's accounting system. 2 CFR 200.302. (b) Source Documentation. Accounting records must be supported by such source documentation as canceled checks, bank statements, invoices, paid bills, donor letters, time and attendance records, activity reports, travel reports, contractual and consultant agreements, and subaward documentation. All supporting documentation should be clearly identified with the Award and general ledger accounts which are to be charged or credited. (i) The documentation standards for salary charges to grants are prescribed by 2 CFR 200.430, and in the cost principles applicable to the entity's organization (Paragraphs 7.4 through 7.7). (ii) If records do not meet the standards in 2 CFR 200. 430, then Grantor may notify Grantee in PART TWO, PART THREE or Exhibit G of the requirement to submit Personnel activity reports. 2 CFR 200.430(i)(8). Personnel activity reports shall account on an after -the -fact basis for one hundred percent (100%) of the employee's actual time, separately indicating the time spent on the Grant, other grants or projects, vacation or sick leave, and administrative time, if applicable. The reports must be signed by the employee, approved by the appropriate official, and coincide with a pay period. These time records should be used to record the distribution of salary costs to the appropriate accounts no less frequently than quarterly. (iii) Formal agreements with independent contractors, such as consultants, must include a description of the services to be performed, the period of performance, the fee and method of payment, an itemization of travel and other costs which are chargeable to the agreement, and the signatures of both the contractor and an appropriate official of Grantee. (iv) If third party in-kind (non-cash) contributions are used for Grant purposes, the valuation of these contributions must be supported with adequate documentation. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 9 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 (c) Internal Control. Effective control and accountability must be maintained for all cash, real and personal property, and other assets. Grantee must adequately safeguard all such property and must provide assurance that it is used solely for authorized purposes. Grantee must also have systems in place that provide reasonable assurance that the information is accurate, allowable, and compliant with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2 CFR 200.303. (d) Budget Control. Records of expenditures must be maintained for each Award by the cost categories of the approved Budget (including indirect costs that are charged to the Award), and actual expenditures are to be compared with budgeted amounts at least quarterly. (e) Cash Management. Requests for advance payment shall be limited to Grantee's immediate cash needs. Grantee must have written procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the receipt and the disbursement of Grant Funds to avoid having excess funds on hand. 2 CFR 200.305. 7.9 Profits. It is not permitted for any person or entity to earn a Profit from an Award. See, e.g., 2 CFR 200.400(g); see also 30 ILCS 708/60(a)(7). 7.10 Management of Program Income. Grantee is encouraged to earn income to defray program costs where appropriate, subject to 2 CFR 200.307. ARTICLE VIII REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS 8.1 Certifications. Grantee shall be responsible for compliance with the enumerated certifications to the extent that the certifications apply to Grantee. (a) Bribery. Grantee certifies that it has not been convicted of bribery or attempting to bribe an officer or employee of the State of Illinois, nor made an admission of guilt of such conduct which is a matter of record (30 ILCS 500/50-5). (b) Bid Rigging. Grantee certifies that it has not been barred from contracting with a unit of state or local government as a result of a violation of Paragraph 33E-3 or 33E-4 of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/33E-3 or 720 I LCS 5/33E-4, respectively). (c) Debt to State. Grantee certifies that neither it, nor its affiliate(s), is/are barred from receiving an Award because Grantee, or its affiliate(s), is/are delinquent in the payment of any debt to the State, unless Grantee, or its affiliate(s), has/have entered into a deferred payment plan to pay off the debt, and Grantee acknowledges Grantor may declare the Agreement void if the certification is false (30 ILCS 500/50-11). (d) International Boycott. Grantee certifies that neither it nor any substantially owned affiliated company is participating or shall participate in an international boycott in violation of the provision of the U.S. Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 USC Appendix 2401 et seq.) or the regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce promulgated under that Act (15 CFR Parts 730 through 774). (e) Dues and Fees. Grantee certifies that it is not prohibited from receiving an Award because it pays dues or fees on behalf of its employees or agents, or subsidizes or otherwise reimburses them for payment of their dues or fees to any club which unlawfully discriminates (775 ILCS 25/1 et seq.). (f) Pro -Children Act. Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with the Pro -Children Act of 2001 in that it prohibits smoking in any portion of its facility used for the provision of health, day care, early childhood development services, education or library services to children under the age of eighteen (18), which services are supported by federal or state government assistance (except such portions of the facilities which are used for inpatient substance abuse treatment) (20 USC 7181-7184). State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 10 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 (g) Drug -Free Work Place. If Grantee is not an individual, Grantee certifies it will provide a drug free workplace pursuant to the Drug Free Workplace Act. 30 ILCS 580/3. If Grantee is an individual and this Agreement is valued at more than $5,000, Grantee certifies it shall not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance during the performance of the Agreement. 30 ILCS 580/4. Grantee further certifies that it is in compliance with the government -wide requirements for a drug-free workplace as set forth in 41 USC 8102. (h) Motor Voter Law. Grantee certifies that it is in full compliance with the terms and provisions of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 USC 20501 et seq.). (i) Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 USC §7401 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 USC 1251 et seq.). (j) Debarment. Grantee certifies that it is not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this Agreement by any federal department or agency 2 CFR 200.205(a), or by the State (30 ILCS 708/25(6)(G)). (k) Non -procurement Debarment and Suspension. Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Subpart C of 2 CFR Part 180 as supplemented by 2 CFR Part 376, Subpart C. (I) Grant for the Construction of Fixed Works. Grantee certifies that all Programs for the construction of fixed works which are financed in whole or in part with funds provided by this Agreement shall be subject to the Prevailing Wage Act (820 ILCS 130/0.01 et seq.) unless the provisions of that Act exempt its application. In the construction of the Program, Grantee shall comply with the requirements of the Prevailing Wage Act including, but not limited to, inserting into all contracts for such construction a stipulation to the effect that not less than the prevailing rate of wages as applicable to the Program shall be paid to all laborers, workers, and mechanics performing work under the Award and requiring all bonds of contractors to include a provision as will guarantee the faithful performance of such prevailing wage clause as provided by contract. (m) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Public Law No. 104-191, 45 CFR Parts 160, 162 and 164, and the Social Security Act, 42 USC 1320d-2 through 1320d-7, in that it may not use or disclose protected health information other than as permitted or required by law and agrees to use appropriate safeguards to prevent use or disclosure of the protected health information. Grantee shall maintain, for a minimum of six (6) years, all protected health information. (n) Criminal Convictions. Grantee certifies that neither it nor a managerial agent of Grantee (for non- governmental grantees only, this includes any officer, director or partner of Grantee) has been convicted of a felony under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, nor a Class 3 or Class 2 felony under Illinois Securities Law of 1953, or that at least five (5) years have passed since the date of the conviction. Grantee further certifies that it is not barred from receiving an Award under 30 ILCS 500/50-10.5, and acknowledges that Grantor shall declare the Agreement void if this certification is false (o) Forced Labor Act. Grantee certifies that it complies with the State Prohibition of Goods from Forced Labor Act, and certifies that no foreign -made equipment, materials, or supplies furnished to the State under this Agreement have been or will be produced in whole or in part by forced labor, convict labor, or indentured labor under penal sanction (30 ILCS 583). (p) Illinois Use Tax. Grantee certifies in accordance with 30 ILCS 500/50-12 that it is not barred from receiving an Award under this Paragraph. Grantee acknowledges that this Agreement may be declared void if this certification is false. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 11 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 (q) Environmental Protection Act Violations. Grantee certifies in accordance with 30 ILCS 500/50-14 that it is not barred from receiving an Award under this Paragraph. Grantee acknowledges that this Agreement may be declared void if this certification is false. (r) Goods from Child Labor Act. Grantee certifies that no foreign -made equipment, materials, or supplies furnished to the State under this Agreement have been produced in whole or in part by the labor of any child under the age of twelve (12) (30 ILCS 584). (s) Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006. Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with the terms and requirements of 31 USC 6101. (t) Illinois Works Review Panel. For Awards made for public works projects, as defined in the Illinois Works Jobs Program Act, Grantee certifies that it and any contractor(s) or sub-contractor(s) that performs work using funds from this Award, shall, upon reasonable notice, appear before and respond to requests for information from the Illinois Works Review Panel. 30 ILCS 559/20-25(d). ARTICLE IX CRIMINAL DISCLOSURE 9.1 Mandatory Criminal Disclosures. Grantee shall continue to disclose to Grantor all violations of criminal law involving fraud, bribery or gratuity violations potentially affecting this Award. 30 ILCS 708/40. Additionally, if Grantee receives over $10 million in total Financial Assistance, funded by either state or federal funds, during the period of this Award, Grantee must maintain the currency of information reported to SAM regarding civil, criminal or administrative proceedings as required by 2 CFR 200.113 and Appendix XII of 2 CFR Part 200, and 30 ILCS 708/40. ARTICLE X UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION 10.1 Compliance with Nondiscrimination Laws. Grantee, its employees and subcontractors under subcontract made pursuant to this Agreement, shall comply with all applicable provisions of State and federal laws and regulations pertaining to nondiscrimination, sexual harassment and equal employment opportunity including, but not limited to, the following laws and regulations and all subsequent amendments thereto: (a) The Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.), including, without limitation, 44 III. Admin. Code Part 750, which is incorporated herein; (b) The Public Works Employment Discrimination Act (775 ILCS 10/1 et seq.); (c) The United States Civil Rights Act of 1964 (as amended) (42 USC 2000a -2000h-6). (See also guidelines to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons [Federal Register: February 18, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 13, Pages 2671-2685)]); (d) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC 794); (e) The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (as amended)(42 USC 12101 et seq.); and (f) The Age Discrimination Act (42 USC 6101 et seq.). State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 12 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 ARTICLE XI LOBBYING Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 11.1 Improper Influence. Grantee certifies that no Grant Funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of Grantee to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any government agency, a member of Congress or Illinois General Assembly, an officer or employee of Congress or Illinois General Assembly, or an employee of a member of Congress or Illinois General Assembly in connection with the awarding of any agreement, the making of any grant, the making of any loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, or the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any agreement, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. 31 USC 1352. Additionally, Grantee certifies that it has filed the required certification under the Byrd Anti -Lobbying Amendment (31 USC 1352), if applicable. 11.2 Federal Form LLL. If any funds, other than federally -appropriated funds, were paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any of the above persons in connection with this Agreement, the undersigned must also complete and submit Federal Form LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Form, in accordance with its instructions. 11.3 Lobbying Costs. Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with the restrictions on lobbying set forth in 2 CFR 200.450. For any Indirect Costs associated with this Agreement, total lobbying costs shall be separately identified in the Program Budget, and thereafter treated as other Unallowable Costs. 11.4 Procurement Lobbying. Grantee warrants and certifies that it and, to the best of its knowledge, its sub - grantees have complied and will comply with Executive Order No. 1 (2007) (EO 1-2007). EO 1-2007 generally prohibits Grantees and subcontractors from hiring the then -serving Governor's family members to lobby procurement activities of the State, or any other unit of government in Illinois including local governments, if that procurement may result in a contract valued at over $25,000. This prohibition also applies to hiring for that same purpose any former State employee who had procurement authority at any time during the one-year period preceding the procurement lobbying activity. 11.5 Subawards. Grantee must include the language of this ARTICLE XI in the award documents for any subawards made pursuant to this Award at all tiers. All sub -grantees are also subject to certification and disclosure. Pursuant to Appendix II(I) to 2 CFR Part 200, Grantee shall forward all disclosures by contractors regarding this certification to Grantor. 11.6 Certification. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed to enter into this transaction and is a prerequisite for this transaction, pursuant to 31 USC 1352. Any person who fails to file the required certifications shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000, and not more than $100,000, for each such failure. ARTICLE XII MAINTENANCE AND ACCESSIBILITY OF RECORDS; MONITORING 12.1 Records Retention. Grantee shall maintain for three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report, adequate books, all financial records and, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to this Award, adequate to comply with 2 CFR 200.334, unless a different retention period is specified in 2 CFR 200.334, 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.430(a) and (b) or PART TWO or PART THREE. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the retention period, the records must be retained until all litigation, claims or audit exceptions involving the records have been resolved and final action taken. 12.2 Accessibility of Records. Grantee, in compliance with 2 CFR 200.337 and 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.430(f), shall make books, records, related papers, supporting documentation and personnel relevant to this Agreement available to authorized Grantor representatives, the Illinois Auditor General, Illinois Attorney General, any Executive Inspector General, the Grantor's Inspector General, federal authorities, any person identified in 2 CFR 200.337, and any other person as may be authorized by Grantor (including auditors), by the State of Illinois or by federal statute. Grantee shall cooperate fully in any such audit or inquiry. 12.3 Failure to Maintain Books and Records. Failure to maintain books, records and supporting documentation, as described in this ARTICLE XII, shall establish a presumption in favor of the State for the recovery of any funds paid by the State under this Agreement for which adequate books, records and supporting documentation are not available to support disbursement. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 13 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 12.4 Monitoring and Access to Information. Grantee must monitor its activities to assure compliance with applicable state and federal requirements and to assure its performance expectations are being achieved. Grantor shall monitor the activities of Grantee to assure compliance with all requirements and performance expectations of the award. Grantee shall timely submit all financial and performance reports, and shall supply, upon Grantor's request, documents and information relevant to the Award. Grantor may make site visits as warranted by program needs. 2 CFR 200.329; 200.332. Additional monitoring requirements may be in PART TWO or PART THREE. ARTICLE XIII FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 13.1 Required Periodic Financial Reports. Grantee agrees to submit financial reports as requested and in the format required by Grantor. Grantee shall file quarterly reports with Grantor describing the expenditure(s) of the funds related thereto, unless more frequent reporting is required by the Grantee pursuant to specific award conditions. 2 CFR 200.208. Unless so specified, the first of such reports shall cover the first three months after the Award begins and reports must be submitted no later than the due date(s) specified in PART TWO or PART THREE, unless additional information regarding required financial reports is set forth in Exhibit G. Failure to submit the required financial reports may cause a delay or suspension of funding. 30 ILCS 705/1 et seq.; 2 CFR 208(b)(3) and 200.328. Any report required by 30 ILCS 708/125 may be detailed in PART TWO or PART THREE. 13.2 Close-out Reports. (a) Grantee shall submit a Close-out Report no later than the due date specified in PART TWO or PART THREE, which must be no later than 60 calendar days following the end of the period of performance for this Agreement or Agreement termination. The format of this Close-out Report shall follow a format prescribed by Grantor. 2 CFR 200.344; 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.440(b) (b) If an audit or review of Grantee occurs and results in adjustments after Grantee submits a Close-out Report, Grantee will submit a new Close-out Report based on audit adjustments, and immediately submit a refund to Grantor, if applicable. 2 CFR 200.345. 13.3 Effect of Failure to Comply. Failure to comply with reporting requirements shall result in the withholding of funds, the return of Improper Payments or Unallowable Costs, will be considered a material breach of this Agreement and may be the basis to recover Grant Funds. Grantee's failure to comply with this ARTICLE XIII, ARTICLE XIV, or ARTICLE XV shall be considered prima facie evidence of a breach and may be admitted as such, without further proof, into evidence in an administrative proceeding before Grantor, or in any other legal proceeding. Grantee should refer to the State of Illinois Grantee Compliance Enforcement System for policy and consequences for failure to comply. 44 III.Admin.Code 7000.80. ARTICLE XIV PERFORMANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 14.1 Required Periodic Performance Reports. Grantee agrees to submit Performance Reports as requested and in the format required by Grantor. Performance Measures listed in Exhibit E must be reported quarterly, unless otherwise specified in PART TWO, PART THREE or Exhibit G. Unless so specified, the first of such reports shall cover the first three months after the Award begins. If Grantee is not required to report performance quarterly, then Grantee must submit a Performance Report at least annually. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.208, specific conditions may be imposed requiring Grantee to report more frequently based on the risk assessment or the merit review of the application. In such cases, Grantor shall notify Grantee of same in Exhibit G. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.329 and 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.410(b)(2), periodic Performance Reports shall be submitted no later than the due date(s) specified in PART TWO or PART THREE. For certain construction -related Awards, such reports may be exempted as identified in PART TWO or PART THREE. 2 CFR 200.329. Failure to submit such required Performance Reports may cause a delay or suspension of funding. 30 ILCS 705/1 et seq. 14.2 Close-out Performance Reports. Grantee agrees to submit a Close-out Performance Report, in the format required by Grantor, no later than the due date specified in PART TWO or PART THREE, which must be no later than 60 calendar days following the end of the period of performance or Agreement termination. 2 CFR 200.344; 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.440(b)(1). State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 14 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 14.3 Content of Performance Reports. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.329(b) and (c) all Performance Reports must relate the financial data and accomplishments to the performance goals and objectives of this Award and also include the following: a comparison of actual accomplishments to the objectives of the award established for the period; where the accomplishments can be quantified, a computation of the cost and demonstration of cost effective practices (e.g. through unit cost data); performance trend data and analysis if required; and reasons why established goals were not met, if appropriate. Appendices may be used to include additional supportive documentation. Additional content and format guidelines for the Performance Reports will be determined by Grantor contingent on the Award's statutory, regulatory and administrative requirements, and are included in PART TWO or PART THREE of this Agreement. 14.4 Performance Standards. Grantee shall perform in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in Exhibit F. 2 CFR 200.301; 200.210. ARTICLE XV AUDIT REQUIREMENTS 15.1 Audits. Grantee shall be subject to the audit requirements contained in the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 USC 7501-7507) and Subpart F of 2 CFR Part 200, and the audit rules and policies set forth by the Governor's Office of Management and Budget. See 30 ILCS 708/65(c.);44 III.Admin.Code 7000.90. 15.2 Consolidated Year -End Financial Reports (CYEFR� All grantees are required to complete and submit a CYEFR through the Grantee Portal, except those exempted by federal or State statute or regulation, as set forth in PART TWO or PART THREE. The CYEFR is a required schedule in the Grantee's audit report if the Grantee is required to complete and submit an audit report as set forth herein. (a) This Paragraph 15.2 applies to all grantees, unless exempted pursuant to a federal or state statute or regulation, which is identified in PART TWO or PART THREE. (b) The CYEFR must cover the same period as the Audited Financial Statements, if required, and must be submitted in accordance with the audit schedule at 44 III.Admin.Code 7000.90. If Audited Financial Statements are not required, however, then the CYEFR must cover the Grantee's fiscal year and must be submitted within 6 months of the Grantee's fiscal year-end. (c) CYEFRs must include an in relation to opinion from the auditor of the financial statements included in the CYEFR. (d) CYEFRs shall follow a format prescribed by Grantor. 15.3 Entities That Are Not "For -Profit". (a) This Paragraph applies to Grantees that are not "for-profit" entities. (b) Single and Program -Specific Audits. If, during its fiscal year, Grantee expends $750,000 or more in Federal Awards (direct federal and federal pass-through awards combined) Grantee must have a single audit or program -specific audit conducted for that year as required by 2 CFR 200.501 and other applicable sections of Subpart F of 2 CFR Part 200. The audit report packet must be completed as described in 2 CFR 200.512 (single audit) or 2 CFR 200.507 (program -specific audit), 44 III.Admin.Code 7000.90(h)(1) and the current GATA audit manual and submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, as required by 2 CFR 200.512. The results of peer and external quality control reviews, management letters issued by auditors and their respective corrective action plans if significant deficiencies or material weaknesses are identified, and the Consolidated Year -End Financial Report(s) must be submitted to the Grantee Portal. The due date of all required submissions set forth in this paragraph is the earlier of (i) 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s) or (ii) nine (9) months after the end of the Grantee's audit period. (c) Financial Statement Audit. If, during its fiscal year, Grantee expends less than $750,000 in Federal Awards, Grantee is subject to the following audit requirements: (i) If, during its fiscal year, Grantee expends $500,000 or more in State Grants, Grantee must have a financial statement audit conducted in accordance with the Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS). Grantee may be subject to additional requirements in PART TWO, PART THREE or Exhibit G based on the Grantee's risk profile. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 15 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 (ii) If, during its fiscal year, Grantee expends less than $500,000 in State Grants, but expends $300,000 or more in State Grants, Grantee must have a financial statement audit conducted in accordance with the Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). (iii) If Grantee is a Local Education Agency (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1), Grantee shall have a financial statement audit conducted in accordance with GAGAS, as required by 23 III. Admin. Code 100.110, regardless of the dollar amount of expenditures of State Grants. (iv) If Grantee does not meet the requirements in subsections 15.3(b) and 15.3(c)(i-iii) but is required to have a financial statement audit conducted based on other regulatory requirements, Grantee must submit those audits for review. (v) Grantee must submit its financial statement audit report packet, as set forth in 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.90(h)(2) and the current GATA audit manual, to the Grantee Portal within the earlier of (i) 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s) or (ii) 6 months after the end of the Grantee's audit period. 15.4 "For -Profit" Entities. (a) This paragraph applies to Grantees that are "for-profit" entities. (b) Program -Specific Audits. If, during its fiscal year, Grantee expends $750,000 or more in federal pass- through funds from State Grants, Grantee is required to have a program -specific audit conducted in accordance with 2 CFR 200.507. The auditor must audit federal pass-through programs with federal pass-through Awards expended that, in the aggregate, cover at least 50 percent (0.50) of total federal pass-through Awards expended. The audit report packet must be completed as described in 2 CFR 200.507 (program -specific audit), 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.90 and the current GATA audit manual, and must be submitted to the Grantee Portal. The due date of all required submissions set forth in this Paragraph is the earlier of (i) 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s) or (ii) nine (9) months after the end of the Grantee's audit period. (c) Financial Statement Audit. If, during its fiscal year, Grantee expends less than $750,000 in federal pass- through funds from State Grants, Grantee must follow all of the audit requirements in Paragraphs 15.3(c)(i)-(v), above. (d) Publicly -Traded Entities. If Grantee is a publicly -traded company, Grantee is not subject to the single audit or program -specific audit requirements, but is required to submit its annual audit conducted in accordance with its regulatory requirements. 15.5 Performance of Audits. For those organizations required to submit an independent audit report, the audit is to be conducted by the Illinois Auditor General (as required for certain governmental entities only), or a Certified Public Accountant or Certified Public Accounting Firm licensed in the State of Illinois or accordance with Section 5.2 of the Illinois Public Accounting Act (225 ILCS 450/5.2). For audits required to be performed subject to Generally Accepted Government Auditing standards or Generally Accepted Auditing standards, Grantee shall request and maintain on file a copy of the auditor's most recent peer review report and acceptance letter. Grantee shall follow procedures prescribed by Grantor for the preparation and submission of audit reports and any related documents. 15.6 Delinquent Reports. When such audit reports or financial statements required under this ARTICLE are prepared by the Illinois Auditor General, if they are not available by the above-specified due date, they will be provided to Grantor within thirty (30) days of becoming available. Otherwise, Grantee should refer to the State of Illinois Grantee Compliance Enforcement System for the policy and consequences for late reporting. 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.80. ARTICLE XVI TERMINATION; SUSPENSION; NON-COMPLIANCE 16.1 Termination. (a) This Agreement may be terminated, in whole or in part, by either Party for any or no reason upon thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice to the other Party. If terminated by the Grantee, Grantee must include the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and, in the case of a partial termination, the portion to be terminated. If Grantor determines in the case of a partial termination that the reduced or modified portion of the Award will not accomplish the purposes for which the Award was made, Grantor may terminate the Agreement in its entirety. 2 CFR 200.340(a)(4). State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 16 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 (b) This Agreement may be terminated, in whole or in part, by Grantor without advance notice: (i) Pursuant to a funding failure under Paragraph 4.1; (ii) If Grantee fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this or any Award, application or proposal, including any applicable rules or regulations, or has made a false representation in connection with the receipt of this or any Grant; (iii) if the Award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities as set forth in Exhibit A PART TWO or PART THREE; or (iv) If Grantee breaches this Agreement and either (1) fails to cure such breach within 15 calendar days' written notice thereof, or (2) if such cure would require longer than 15 calendar days and the Grantee has failed to commence such cure within 15 calendar days' written notice thereof. In the event that Grantor terminates this Agreement as a result of the breach of the Agreement by Grantee, Grantee shall be paid for work satisfactorily performed prior to the date of termination. 16.2 Suspension. Grantor may suspend this Agreement, in whole or in part, pursuant to a funding failure under Paragraph 4.1 or if the Grantee fails to comply with terms and conditions of this or any Award. If suspension is due to Grantee's failure to comply, Grantor may withhold further payment and prohibit Grantee from incurring additional obligations pending corrective action by Grantee or a decision to terminate this Agreement by Grantor. Grantor may determine to allow necessary and proper costs that Grantee could not reasonably avoid during the period of suspension. 16.3 Non-compliance. If Grantee fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, regulations or the terms and conditions of this or any Award, Grantor may impose additional conditions on Grantee, as described in 2 CFR 200.208. If Grantor determines that non-compliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, Grantor may take one or more of the actions described in 2 CFR 200.339. The Parties shall follow all Grantor policies and procedures regarding non- compliance, including, but not limited to, the procedures set forth in the State of Illinois Grantee Compliance Enforcement System. 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.80 and, 7000.260. 16.4 Objection. If Grantor suspends or terminates this Agreement, in whole or in part, for cause, or takes any other action in response to Grantee's non-compliance, Grantee may avail itself of any opportunities to object and challenge such suspension, termination or other action by Grantor in accordance with any applicable processes and procedures, including, but not limited to, the procedures set forth in the State of Illinois Grantee Compliance Enforcement System. 2 CFR 200.342; 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.80 and, 7000.260. 16.5 Effects of Suspension and Termination. (a) Grantor may credit Grantee for expenditures incurred in the performance of authorized services under this Agreement prior to the effective date of a suspension or termination. (b) Grantee shall not incur any costs or obligations that require the use of these Grant Funds after the effective date of a suspension or termination, and shall cancel as many outstanding obligations as possible. (c) Costs to Grantee resulting from obligations incurred by Grantee during a suspension or after termination of the Agreement are not allowable unless: (i) Grantor expressly authorizes them in the notice of suspension or termination; and (ii) The costs result from obligations properly incurred before the effective date of suspension or termination, are not in anticipation of the suspension or termination, and the costs would be allowable if the Agreement was not suspended or terminated. 2 CFR 200.343. 16.6 Close-out of Terminated Agreements. If this Agreement is terminated, in whole or in part, the Parties shall comply with all close-out and post -termination requirements of this Agreement. 2 CFR 200.340(d). ARTICLE XVII SU BCONTRACTS/SU B -G RANTS 17.1 Sub-recipients/Delegation. Grantee may not subcontract nor sub -grant any portion of this Agreement nor delegate any duties hereunder without Prior Approval of Grantor. The requirement for Prior Approval is satisfied if the subcontractor or sub -grantee has been identified in the Uniform Grant Application, such as, without limitation, a Project Description, and Grantor has approved. Grantee must notify any potential sub -recipient that the sub -recipient shall obtain and provide to the Grantee a Unique Entity Identifier prior to receiving a subaward. 2 CFR 25.300. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 17 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 17.2 Application of Terms. Grantee shall advise any sub -grantee of funds awarded through this Agreement of the requirements imposed on them by federal and state laws and regulations, and the provisions of this Agreement. The terms of this Agreement shall apply to all subawards authorized in accordance with Paragraph 17.1. 2 CFR 200.101(b) (2)• 17.3 Liability as Guaranty. Grantee shall be liable as guarantor for any Grant Funds it obligates to a sub -grantee or sub -contractor pursuant to Paragraph 17.1 in the event the Grantor determines the funds were either misspent or are being improperly held and the sub -grantee or sub -contractor is insolvent or otherwise fails to return the funds. 2 CFR 200.345; 30 ILCS 705/6; 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.450(a). ARTICLE XVIII NOTICE OF CHANGE 18.1 Notice of Change. Grantee shall notify the Grantor if there is a change in Grantee's legal status, federal employer identification number (FEIN), DUNS Number, UEI, SAM registration status, Related Parties, senior management (for non-governmental grantees only), or address. 30 ILCS 708/60(a). If the change is anticipated, Grantee shall give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to Grantor. If the change is unanticipated, Grantee shall give notice as soon as practicable thereafter. Grantor reserves the right to take any and all appropriate action as a result of such change(s). 18.2 Failure to Provide Notification. To the extent permitted by Illinois law, Grantee shall hold harmless Grantor for any acts or omissions of Grantor resulting from Grantee's failure to notify Grantor of these changes. 18.3 Notice of Impact. Grantee shall immediately notify Grantor of any event that may have a material impact on Grantee's ability to perform this Agreement. 18.4 Circumstances Affecting Performance: Notice. In the event Grantee becomes a party to any litigation, investigation or transaction that may reasonably be considered to have a material impact on Grantee's ability to perform under this Agreement, Grantee shall notify Grantor, in writing, within five (5) calendar days of determining such litigation or transaction may reasonably be considered to have a material impact on the Grantee's ability to perform under this Agreement. 18.5 Effect of Failure to Provide Notice. Failure to provide the notice described in Paragraph 18.4 shall be grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement and any costs incurred after notice should have been given shall be disallowed. ARTICLE XIX STRUCTURAL REORGANIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BOARD MEMBERSHIP 19.1 Effect of Reorganization. Grantee acknowledges that this Agreement is made by and between Grantor and Grantee, as Grantee is currently organized and constituted. No promise or undertaking made hereunder is an assurance that Grantor agrees to continue this Agreement, or any license related thereto, should Grantee significantly reorganize or otherwise substantially change the character of its corporate structure, business structure or governance structure. Grantee agrees that it will give Grantor prior notice of any such action or changes significantly affecting its overall structure or, for non-governmental grantees only, management makeup (for example, a merger or a corporate restructuring), and will provide any and all reasonable documentation necessary for Grantor to review the proposed transaction including financial records and corporate and shareholder minutes of any corporation which may be involved. This ARTICLE XIX does not require Grantee to report on minor changes in the makeup of its board membership or governance structure, as applicable. Nevertheless, PART TWO or PART THREE may impose further restrictions. Failure to comply with this ARTICLE XIX shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. ARTICLE XX AGREEMENTS WITH OTHER STATE AGENCIES 20.1 Copies upon Request. Grantee shall, upon request by Grantor, provide Grantor with copies of contracts or other agreements to which Grantee is a party with any other State agency. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 18 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 ARTICLE XXI Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 CONFLICT OF INTEREST 21.1 Required Disclosures. Grantee must immediately disclose in writing any potential or actual Conflict of Interest to the Grantor. 2 CFR 200.113 and 30 ILCS 708/35. 21.2 Prohibited Payments. Grantee agrees that payments made by Grantor under this Agreement will not be used to compensate, directly or indirectly, any person currently holding an elective office in this State, including, but not limited to, a seat in the General Assembly. In addition, where the Grantee is not an instrumentality of the State of Illinois, as described in this Paragraph, Grantee agrees that payments made by Grantor under this Agreement will not be used to compensate, directly or indirectly, any person employed by an office or agency of the State of Illinois whose annual compensation is in excess of sixty percent (60%) of the Governor's annual salary, or $106,447.20. An instrumentality of the State of Illinois includes, without limitation, State departments, agencies, boards,and Sate universities. An instrumentality of the State of Illinois does not include, without limitation, municipalities and units of local government and related entities. See definition of "Local government," 2 CFR 200.1. 21.3 Request for Exemption. Grantee may request written approval from Grantor for an exemption from Paragraph 21.2. Grantee acknowledges that Grantor is under no obligation to provide such exemption and that Grantor may, if an exemption is granted, grant such exemption subject to such additional terms and conditions as Grantor may require. ARTICLE XXII EQUIPMENT OR PROPERTY 22.1 Purchase of Equipment. For any equipment purchased in whole or in part with Grant Funds, if Grantor determines that Grantee has not met the conditions of 2 CFR 200.439, the costs for such equipment will be disallowed. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing that the purchase of equipment is disallowed. 22.2 Prohibition against Disposition/Encumbrance. Any equipment, material, or real property that Grantee purchases or improves with Grant Funds may not be sold, transferred, encumbered (other than original financing) or otherwise disposed of during the Grant Term without Prior Approval of Grantor unless a longer period is required in PART TWO or PART THREE and permitted by 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D. Any real property acquired or improved using Grant Funds must comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.311. Grantee acknowledges that real property, equipment, and intangible property that are acquired or improved in whole or in part by Grant Funds are subject to the provisions of 2 CFR 200.316 and the Grantor may require the Grantee to record liens or other appropriate notices of record to indicate that personal or real property has been acquired or improved with this Award and that use and disposition conditions apply to the property. 22.3 Equipment and Procurement. Grantee must comply with the uniform standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.310 -200.316 governing the management and disposition of property which cost was supported by Grant Funds. Any waiver from such compliance must be granted by either the President's Office of Management and Budget, the Governor's Office of Management and Budget, or both, depending on the source of the Grant Funds used. Additionally, Grantee must comply with the standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.317-200.326 for use in establishing procedures for the procurement of supplies and other expendable property, equipment, real property and other services with Grant Funds. These standards are furnished to ensure that such materials and services are obtained in an effective manner and in compliance with the provisions of applicable federal and state statutes and executive orders. 22.4 Equipment Instructions. Grantee must obtain disposition instructions from Grantor when equipment, purchased in whole or in part with Grant Funds, are no longer needed for their original purpose. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained within this Agreement, Grantor may require transfer of any equipment to Grantor or a third party for any reason, including, without limitation, if Grantor terminates the Award or Grantee no longer conducts Award activities. The Grantee shall properly maintain, track, use, store and insure the equipment according to applicable best practices, manufacturer's guidelines, federal and state laws or rules, and Grantor requirements stated herein. 22.5 Domestic Preferences for Procurements. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.322, as appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the Grantee should, to the greatest extent practicable under this Award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this paragraph must be included in all subawards and in all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this Award. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 19 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 ARTICLE XXIII Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS; PRIOR NOTIFICATION 23.1 Publications, Announcements, etc. Use of Grant Funds for promotions is subject to the prohibitions for advertising or public relations costs in 2 CFR 200.421(e). In the event that Grant Funds are used in whole or in part to produce any written publications, announcements, reports, flyers, brochures or other written materials, Grantee shall obtain Prior Approval for the use of those funds (2 CFR 200.467) and agrees to include in these publications, announcements, reports, flyers, brochures and all other such material, the phrase "Funding provided in whole or in part by the [Grantor]." Exceptions to this requirement must be requested, in writing, from Grantor and will be considered authorized only upon written notice thereof to Grantee. 23.2 Prior Notification/Release of Information. Grantee agrees to notify Grantor ten (10) days prior to issuing public announcements or press releases concerning work performed pursuant to this Agreement, or funded in whole or in part by this Agreement, and to cooperate with Grantor in joint or coordinated releases of information. ARTICLE XXIV INSURANCE 24.1 Maintenance of Insurance. Grantee shall maintain in full force and effect during the Term of this Agreement casualty and bodily injury insurance, as well as insurance sufficient to cover the replacement cost of any and all real or personal property, or both, purchased or, otherwise acquired, or improved in whole or in part, with funds disbursed pursuant to this Agreement. 2 CFR 200.310. Additional insurance requirements may be detailed in PART TWO or PART THREE. 24.2 Claims. If a claim is submitted for real or personal property, or both, purchased in whole with funds from this Agreement and such claim results in the recovery of money, such money recovered shall be surrendered to Grantor. ARTICLE XXV LAWSUITS AND INDEMNIFICATON 25.1 Independent Contractor. Neither Grantee nor any employee or agent of Grantee acquires any employment rights with Grantor by virtue of this Agreement. Grantee will provide the agreed services and achieve the specified results free from the direction or control of Grantor as to the means and methods of performance. Grantee will be required to provide its own equipment and supplies necessary to conduct its business; provided, however, that in the event, for its convenience or otherwise, Grantor makes any such equipment or supplies available to Grantee, Grantee's use of such equipment or supplies provided by Grantor pursuant to this Agreement shall be strictly limited to official Grantor or State of Illinois business and not for any other purpose, including any personal benefit or gain. 25.2 Indemnification and Liability. (a) Non-governmental entities. This subparagraph applies only if Grantee is a non-governmental entity. To the extent permitted by law, Grantee agrees to hold harmless Grantor against any and all liability, loss, damage, cost or expenses, including attorney's fees, arising from the intentional torts, negligence or breach of contract of Grantee, with the exception of acts performed in conformance with an explicit, written directive of Grantor. Indemnification by Grantor will be governed by the State Employee Indemnification Act (5 ILCS 350/1 et seq.) as interpreted by the Illinois Attorney General. Grantor makes no representation that Grantee, an independent contractor, will qualify or be eligible for indemnification under said Act. (b) Governmental entities. This subparagraph applies only if Grantee is a governmental entity. Neither Party shall be liable for actions chargeable to the other Party under this Agreement including, but not limited to, the negligent acts and omissions of Party's agents, employees or subcontractors in the performance of their duties as described under this Agreement, unless such liability is imposed by law. This Agreement shall not be construed as seeking to enlarge or diminish any obligation or duty owed by one Party against the other or against a third party. ARTICLE XXVI MISCELLANEOUS 26.1 Gift Ban. Grantee is prohibited from giving gifts to State employees pursuant to the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act (5 ILCS 430/10-10) and Executive Order 15-09. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 20 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 26.2 Access to Internet. Grantee must have Internet access. Internet access may be either dial-up or high-speed. Grantee must maintain, at a minimum, one business e-mail address that will be the primary receiving point for all e-mail correspondence from Grantor. Grantee may list additional e-mail addresses at any time during the Term of this Agreement. The additional addresses may be for a specific department or division of Grantee or for specific employees of Grantee. Grantee must notify Grantor of any e-mail address changes within five (5) business days from the effective date of the change. 26.3 Exhibits and Attachments. Exhibits A through G, PART TWO, PART THREE, if applicable, and all other exhibits and attachments hereto are incorporated herein in their entirety. 26.4 Assignment Prohibited. Grantee acknowledges that this Agreement may not be sold, assigned, or transferred in any manner by Grantee, to include an assignment of Grantee's rights to receive payment hereunder, and that any actual or attempted sale, assignment, or transfer by Grantee without the Prior Approval of Grantor in writing shall render this Agreement null, void and of no further effect. 26.5 Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended at any time during its Term by mutual consent of the Parties, expressed in writing and signed by the Parties. 26.6 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid, its other provisions shall not be affected thereby. 26.7 No Waiver. No failure of either Party to assert any right or remedy hereunder will act as a waiver of either Party's right to assert such right or remedy at a later time or constitute a course of business upon which either Party may rely for the purpose of denial of such a right or remedy. 26.8 Applicable Law; Claims. This Agreement and all subsequent amendments thereto, if any, shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois. Any claim against Grantor arising out of this Agreement must be filed exclusively with the Illinois Court of Claims. 705 ILCS 505/1 et seq. Grantor does not waive sovereign immunity by entering into this Agreement. 26.9 Compliance with Law. This Agreement and Grantee's obligations and services hereunder are hereby made and must be performed in compliance with all applicable federal and State laws, including, without limitation, federal regulations, State administrative rules, including 44 III. Admin. Code 7000, and any and all license requirements or professional certification provisions. 26.10 Compliance with Confidentiality Laws. If applicable, Grantee shall comply with applicable state and federal statutes, federal regulations and Grantor administrative rules regarding confidential records or other information obtained by Grantee concerning persons served under this Agreement. The records and information shall be protected by Grantee from unauthorized disclosure. 26.11 Compliance with Freedom of Information Act. Upon request, Grantee shall make available to Grantor all documents in its possession that Grantor deems necessary to comply with requests made under the Freedom of Information Act. (5 ILCS 140/7(2)). State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 21 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 26.12 Precedence. (a) Except as set forth in subparagraph (b), below, the following rules of precedence are controlling for this Agreement. In the event there is a conflict between this Agreement and any of the exhibits or attachments hereto, this Agreement shall control. In the event there is a conflict between PART ONE and PART TWO or PART THREE of this Agreement, PART ONE shall control. In the event there is a conflict between PART TWO and PART THREE of this Agreement, PART TWO shall control. In the event there is a conflict between this Agreement and relevant statute(s) or rule(s), the relevant statute(s) or rules shall control. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions in subparagraph (a), above, if a relevant federal or state statute(s) or rule(s) requires an exception to this Agreement's provisions, or an exception to a requirement in this Agreement is granted by GATU, such exceptions must be noted in PART TWO or PART THREE, and in such cases, those requirements control. 26.13 Illinois Grant Funds Recovery Act. In the event of a conflict between the Illinois Grant Funds Recovery Act and the Grant Accountability and Transparency Act, the provisions of the Grant Accountability and Transparency Act shall control. 30 ILCS 708/80. 26.14 Headings. Article and other headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and are not intended to define or limit the scope, extent or intent of this Agreement or any provision hereof. 26.15 Entire Agreement. Grantee and Grantor acknowledge that this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between them and that no promises, terms, or conditions not recited, incorporated or referenced herein, including prior agreements or oral discussions, shall be binding upon either Grantee or Grantor. 26.16 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be considered to be one and the same agreement, binding on all Parties hereto, notwithstanding that all Parties are not signatories to the same counterpart. Duplicated signatures, signatures transmitted via facsimile, or signatures contained in a Portable Document Format (PDF) document shall be deemed original for all purposes. 26.17 Attorney Fees and Costs. Unless prohibited by law, if Grantor prevails in any proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement, including any administrative hearing pursuant to the Grant Funds Recovery Act or the Grant Accountability and Transparency Act, the Grantor has the right to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses associated with such proceedings. 26.18 Continuing Responsibilities. The termination or expiration of this Agreement does not affect; (a) the right of the Grantor to disallow costs and recover funds based on a later audit or other review; (b) the obligation of the Grantee to return any funds due as a result of later refunds, corrections or other transactions, including, without limitation, final Indirect Cost Rate adjustments and those funds obligated pursuant to ARTICLE XVII; (c) the Consolidated Year -End Financial Report; (d) audit requirements established in ARTICLE XV; (e) property management and disposition requirements established in 2 CFR 200.310 through 2 CFR 200.316 and ARTICLE XXII; or (f) records related requirements pursuant to ARTICLE XII. 44 III. Admin. Code 7000.450. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 22 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 EXHIBIT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION CSFA Number NOSA/SAIN Number GATA Regis ration Number 494-00-1439/1437 (If Needed) 1439-38782 686983 Project Scope * A strategic goal of the Village of Mount Prospect is to implement a complete bike network that provides the community a viable and safe alternative mode of transportation. The Village Bicycle Plan, adopted in 2012, identifies three infrastructure phases. Phase I includes on -street bike routes along low volume, residential streets that connect to key destinations such as parks, schools, shopping, restaurants, and adjacent communities. The Village has completed 15 miles of on -street bike routes and will complete the final 13 miles in 2022. Phase 11 and Phase III include bike facilities along arterial roadways with most of them under the jurisdiction of IDOT. Three of the routes (Northwest Highway, Golf Road, and Central Road) are part of the Northwest Municipal Conference Corridor Bike Plan. The Village is committed to implementing Phase 11 and Phase III but recognizes the design and financial challenges. We have already locally funded and completed Phase I Engineering studies for two IDOT routes, Rand Road and Algonquin Road, that will see a shared use path on one side and sidewalk on the other. Phase 11 Engineering is complete for a portion of Rand Road with construction to begin in 2022. The project for which the Village is requesting funding will be a planning study to gather existing conditions, evaluate alternatives, develop cost estimates, and prioritize future projects for the remaining 14 arterial roadways. Initial work would include performing site surveys, data collection (along routes, bus stops, schools, parks, train stations), and interviews/coordination with key stakeholders such as IDOT, Cook County, Pace, Metra, and Union Pacific Railroad. Additional tasks would include a comprehensive alternatives analysis for each route, roadway lighting evaluation for each route, cost estimates for the various engineering phases, identification of funding sources, and a prioritization schedule to complete the bike network. Ultimately, the Village will have a comprehensive study that provides a path forward to making Mount Prospect a well-known, biking community for the benefit of our residents and the region. The Village has areas throughout the community of low income housing. Often, these residents rely on walking, biking and transit as primary modes of transportation. Connecting people to transit and providing a safe and efficient bike network will enhance mobility and provide greater access to work, businesses, and recreation. ime needed to complete the project anuary 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024 State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 23 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 EXHIBIT B DELIVERABLES OR MILESTONES Deliverables: AA comprehensive, active study that provides a path forward to fund, design and construct a bike network on all Village arterial roadways. Deliverables should be submitted to: Illinois Department of Transportation Bureau of Planning Attention: Lee Ann Prather 2300 S. Dirksen Parkway, Room Springfield, IL 62764 leeann.prather@illinois.gov State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 24 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Grantee shall receive $280,000.00 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 EXHIBIT C PAYMENT under this agreement. Enterspecific terms of agreement here: Federal Funds: $280,000.00 State Match Funds: $0.00 Grantee Local Match Funds: $70,000.00 This Agreement and period of performance are for the term of 01/01/2023 - 12/31/2024. The Grantee shall receive $280,000.00 in Federal Funds and $0.00 in State Funds, if applicable, under this Agreement. Total invoices to be submitted under this Agreement and during the Agreement term shall not exceed the the total Agreement amount as specified above without a fully executed Amendment to this Agreement. I. Invoices. Part One Invoices submitted by the Grantee will be for expenses that have been incurred to complete the Scope of Services/ Responsibilities in Exhibit A, Project Description. If the Grantee's invoices are deemed by the Grantor or auditors to not be sufficiently documented for work completed, the Grantor may require further records and supporting documents to verify the amounts, recipients and uses of all funds invoiced pursuant to this Agreement. Furthermore, if any of the Deliverables or Milestones in Exhibit B are not satisfactorily completed, the Grantee will refund payments made under this Agreement to the extent that such payments were made for any such incomplete or unsatisfactory deliverable. The Grantee must submit invoices for allowable expenditures to the Grantor's Finance Unit in order to receive reimbursement. Any invoices issued by the Grantee to the Grantor pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent to the Grantor's Finance Unit at: Illinois Department of Transportation Office of Planning and Programming Attention: Finance Unit 2300 S. Dirksen Parkway, Room 318 Springfield, IL 62764 email: dot.opp.finance@illinois.gov II. All invoices shall be signed by an authorized representative of the Grantee. a. The submittal must include: i. Cover letter to the C-13 1. The cover letter shall state the Obligation Number, Agreement Project Name, and Source of Funding being requested i.e. FHWA PL. ii. Requests for reimbursement must be requested on Illinois Comptroller form C-13 1. The C-13 shall include the following a. Obligation Number b. Date range of work completed (i.e. 1/1/2021 - 1/31/2021) c. Short description of work completed d. Indication of total amount of federal and matching funds expended iii. Back up documentation which may include payroll and expenditure reports must be submitted with each invoice iv. Signature certification by the Grantee's Finance Officer of accurate expenses v. Expenditure and Progress Report shall include 1. Percentage of work completed and amount requested per line item for invoice period. 2. Identification of expenditures by work task. III. Progress Reports are required under 23 CFR 420.17. State and Federal regulations require: a. Reports shall be submitted to the Grantor contact 30 days after the end of the reporting period. b. Final reports shall be submitted to the Grantor contact 60 days after the end of the reporting period. IV. Year -End Report. At the end of the State Fiscal Year (SFY) a Year -End report should include a summary of work State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 25 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 and a list of deliverables that were IDOT Project Manager Review and Approval. a. Upon submittal of an invoice, the IDOT Project Manager shall review and check: i. Mathematical accuracy. ii. That requested reimbursement is consistent with items included in the approved scope. iii. That total amount invoiced is proportional to total amount budgeted. iv. Expenditures for each line item is less than or equal to the budgeted amount. v. Completion of the work being invoiced. b. Failure to provide a complete invoice may delay or prevent reimbursement. If there are problems with the invoice, the I DOT Project Manager will contact the Grantee to resolve the issue in order to allow for invoice processing. This may require the submission of a new or corrected invoice by the Grantee. c. The IDOT Project Manager will review and approve or reject the invoice within seven days of the Grantee's submittal. If invoice is rejected or contains errors, the invoice will not be sent to the Illinois Comptroller until it is revised, corrected AND approved by the IDOT Project Manager. Grantor Finance Unit Approval. a. Once approved by IDOT Project Manger, the Finance Unit shall submit invoices to the Bureau of Business -vices, Accounting Unit, which documents the transaction and forwards to the Illinois Comptroller. Payment. a. Once approved, the Comptroller forwards payment either via Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) or by mailing a check to the Grantee's Local Public Agency (LPA). b. If approved by the IDOT Project Manager, payment is generally made within 15 days of receiving a complete invoice. VIII. Indirect Cost Rate Eligibility. a. Indirect cost rate shall be referred to as "indirect cost rate", "rate(s)", or "ICR" throughout the language in this grant agreement. b. The Grantee is only eligible to receive an indirect cost rate if requested on the grant application and the following stipulations are met: i. The Grantee has a finalized indirect cost rate for the corresponding fiscal year wherein the expenses are allowable under the Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA); If this is the first time for negotiating an indirect cost rate, the grantee has the option to request a 10% provisional De Minimis rate until the rate is finalized. ii. The Grantee is eligible to receive a provisional rate at the commencement of the grant agreement if the rate for the corresponding fiscal year is not finalized before the execution of said grant agreement in which the provisional rate is being requested. iii. The Grantee adheres to the requirements for receiving an indirect cost rate including, but not limited to, have appropriate approval to receive indirect cost funds and finalize the indirect cost rate that have been provisionally offered in a timely manner (timeliness is at the discretion of the Grantor). c. The Grantee acknowledges that provisional rates are not guaranteed for the duration of this grant agreement. A rate shall be finalized prior to the end of the grant year. It is the Grantee's responsibility to ensure rate is finalized and recognized by the Grantor prior to end of the grant year. i. If the Grantee provisional rate is finalized at a higher rate, the grantee can request an amendment to the agreement. The Grantee is permitted one such request per grant agreement. If there is funding available, it will be at the discretion of the Department to allow the higher rate. Consideration and authorization will not be unduly withheld. ii. Rates finalized at a lower rate than the provisional rate shall result in the Grantor issuing an amendment to this agreement to lower the provisional rate to the finalized rate. If the Grantee makes the Grantor aware of the lower rate, and the Grantor fails process an amendment to the agreement to lower the rate prior to the grant's expiation, the Grantor shall not seek reimbursement from the Grantee. However, if the Grantee fails to notify the Grantor of the reduced rate, the Grantor may seek reimbursement from Grantee as outlined in section iv below. iii. Any overpayments of indirect cost shall be resolved by one of the following: 1. Grantee shall issue refund payment to IDOT for the total amount of the overage, 2. Grantee shall recognize overage on future invoices and off -set the amount due to the Grantee by the overage amount, State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 26 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 3. Grantee and Grantor shall mutually agree to a repayment process that is not unduly restrictive. The repayment agreement shall be documented and retained in file. rpayments shall be calculated and determined by Grantor with notification to Grantee iv. If provisional indirect cost rates are not finalized three (3) months prior to the end of this agreement term, the 'RANTOR may seek repayment of all indirect costs that were issued under the provisional rate. The overage will be off et through the remaining reimbursement submittals, or if no further expenditures are submitted for reimbursement, the 'RANTOR will issue a reimbursement statement to the GRANTEE. d. The Grantee is fully aware and in understanding of the Illinois Grant Funds Recovery Act as listed in Article :XVI subsection 26.13 of this grant agreement. e. The Grantee acknowledges that the rate may be denied, altered, or otherwise amended outside the scope f rate requirements listed in Exhibit C subsection VI of this agreement. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 27 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 EXHIBIT D CONTACT INFORMATION CONTACT FOR NOTIFICATION Unless specified elsewhere, all notices required or desired to be sent by either Party shall be sent to the persons listed below. GRANTOR CONTACT Name: Lee Ann Prather Title: Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Address: 2300 S. Dirksen Parkway, Springfield, IL 62764 Phone: 217-993-1316 TTY#: N/A Fax#: N/A Email Address: Ieeann.prather@illinois.gov GRANTEE CONTACT Name: Matthew Lawrie Title: Village Engineer Address: 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Phone: 847-870-5640 TTY#: N/A Fax#: N/A Email Address: mlawrie@mountprospect.org Additional Information: Office of Planning and Programming Bureau of Planning - Finance Unit 2300 S. Dirksen Parkway Room 318 Springfield, IL 62764 dot.opp.finance@illinois.gov State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 28 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 EXHIBIT E PERFORMANCE MEASURES For the sake of this Agreement, performance measures will be based on the Performance Standards contained in Exhibit F as well as Grantee's submittals and will be used to assess the Grantee's adherence to the requirements enumerated in this Agreement. e Grantee shall: Submit accurate and timely invoices at a minimum, quarterly. Promptly respond to inquiries by Grantor. Promptly notify Project Manager identified in Exhibit D of project delays and cause of said delays. Completion of the BOBS 2832 form as required in PART TWO - THE GRANTOR -SPECIFIC TERMS, Reporting. Provide a copy of the final products within 60 calendar days of the conclusion of this Agreement. REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIALLY LEFT BLANK. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 29 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 EXHIBIT F PERFORMANCE STANDARDS For the sake of this Agreement, Performance Standards have been established by the Department to ensure the Grantee has adequate systems in place to meet the requirements contained in this Agreement. The Grantee shall: 1. Have adequate financial systems in place to meet the requirements of this Agreement, this includes: a. Written policies and procedures to guide program delivery b. Internal controls c. Has the financial match, if required d. Has or will have all required audits completed and submitted in a timely manner. 2. Have adequate staff or have the capacity to procure contractors and/or consultants to complete the deliverables enumerated in this Agreement. 3. Has resolved or is working to resolve and close audit and/or programmatic findings, delays in delivery of prior year agreements, issues of non-compliance and any Project Manager identified issues. REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIALLY LEFT BLANK. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 30 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 EXHIBIT G Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS Grantor may remove (or reduce) a Specific Condition included in this Exhibit G by providing written notice to the Grantee, in accordance with established procedures for removing a Specific Condition. These specific conditions, as listed in the accepted Notice of State Award (NOSA), are based upon the grantee's responses to the Fiscal and Administrative Risk Assessment (ICQ), the Programmatic Risk Assessment (PRA) and any pertinent Merit Based Review process (if applicable). Additional Reporting Requirements may also be found in Part TWO and Part THREE of this agreement. FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE RISK: None Identified PROGRAMMATIC RISK: None Identified State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 31 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 PART TWO - THE GRANTOR -SPECIFIC TERMS In addition to the uniform requirements in PART ONE, the Grantor has the following additional requirements for its Grantee: Audit. Grantee shall permit, and shall require its contractors and auditors to permit, the Grantor, and any authorized agent of the Grantor, to inspect all work, materials, payrolls, audit working papers, and other data and records pertaining to the Project; and to audit the books, records, and accounts of the Grantee with regard to the Project. The Grantor may, at its sole discretion and at its own expense, perform a final audit of the Project. Such audit may be used for settlement of the grant and Project closeout. Grantee agrees to implement any audit findings contained in the Grantor's authorized inspection or review, final audit, the Grantee's independent audit, or as a result of any duly �borized inspection or review t Ics. A. Code of Conduct 1. Personal Conflict of Interest - The Grantee shall maintain a written code or standard of conduct which shall govern the performance of its employees, officers, board members, or agents engaged in the award and administration of contracts supported by state or federal funds. Such code shall provide that no employee, officer, board member or agent of the Grantee may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by state or federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent would be involved. Such a conflict would arise when any of the parties set forth below has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for award: a. the employee, officer, board member, or agent; b. any member of his or her immediate family; c. his or her partner; or d. an organization which employs, or is about to employ, any of the above. The conflict of interest restriction for former employees, officers, board members and agents shall apply for one year. The code shall also provide that Grantee's employees, officers, board members, or agents shall neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors, potential contractors, or parties to subcontracts. The Grantor may waive the prohibition contained in this subsection, provided that any such present employee, officer, board member, or agent shall not participate in any action by the Grantee or the locality relating to such contract, subcontract, or arrangement. The code shall also prohibit the officers, employees, board members, or agents of the Grantee from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest or personal gain. 2. Organizational Conflict of Interest - The Grantee will also prevent any real or apparent organizational conflict of interest. An organizational conflict of interest exists when the nature of the work to be performed under a proposed third party contract or subcontract may, without some restriction on future activities, result in an unfair competitive advantage to the third party contractor or Grantee or impair the objectivity in performing the contract work. Dispute Resolution. In the event of a dispute in the interpretation of the provisions of this Agreement, such dispute shall be settled through negotiations between the Grantor and the Grantee. In the event that agreement is not consummated at this negotiation level, the dispute will then be referred through proper administrative channels for a decision and ultimately, if necessary, to the Secretary of the Illinois Department of Transportation. The Grantor shall decide all claims, questions and disputes which are referred to it regarding the interpretation, prosecution and fulfillment of this Agreement. The Grantor's decision upon all claims, questions and disputes shall be final and conclusive. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 32 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 Procurement Procedures/Employment of Grantor Personnel 1. Procurement of Goods or Services - Federal Funds - For purchases of products or services with any Federal funds that costs more than $10,000.00 but less than the simplified acquisition threshold fixed at 41 U.S.C. 134), (currently set at $250,000.00) the Grantee shall obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number (no less than three (3)) of qualified sources. Procurement of products or services with any Federal funds for $250,000 or more will require the Grantee to use the Invitation for Bid process or the Request for Proposal process. In the absence of formal codified procedures of the Grantee, the procedures of the Grantor will be used. The Grantee may only procure products or services from one source with any Federal funds if: (1) the products or services are available only from a single source; or (2) the Grantor authorizes such a procedure; or (3) the Grantor determines competition is inadequate after solicitation from a number of sources. For Micro -Purchase (2 C.F.R. 200.67) Procurement of Goods or Services with Federal Funds: where the aggregate amount does not exceed the micro -purchase threshold currently set at $10,000 (or $2,000 if the procurement is construction and subject to Davis -Bacon), to the extent practicable, the Grantee must distribute micro -purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro -purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the Grantee considers the price to be reasonable. The micro -purchase threshold is set by the Federal Acquisition Regulation at 48 C.F.R. Subpart 2.1 2. Procurement of Goods or Services - State Funds -- For purchases of products or services with any State of Illinois funds that cost more than $20,000.00, ($10,000.00 for professional and artistic services) but less than the small purchase amount set by the Illinois Procurement Code Rules, (currently set at $100,000.00 and $100,000.00 for professional and artistic services) the Grantee shall obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number (no less than three (3)) of qualified sources. Procurement of products or services with any State of Illinois funds for $50,000.00 or more for goods and services and $20,000.00 or more for professional and artistic services) will require the Grantee to use the Invitation for Bid process or the Request for Proposal process. In the absence of formal codified procedures of the Grantee, the procedures of the Grantor will be used. The Grantee may only procure products or services from one source with any State of Illinois funds if: (1) the products or services are available only from a single source; or (2) the Grantor authorizes such a procedure; or, (3) the Grantor determines competition is inadequate after solicitation from a number of sources. The Grantee shall include a requirement in all contracts with third parties that the contractor or consultant will comply with the requirements of this Agreement in performing such contract, and that the contract is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. For Procurement of Goods or Services that cost less than $20,000.00, the Grantee shall comply with the following procurement standards: ($10,000-$19,999, requires Grantor approval) 1. Identify a need for goods or services. 2. Estimate the total cost of the procurement. 3. Identify registered small businesses in the applicable category. 4. Develop specifications to solicit quotes. 5. Email ALL identified small business vendors a request for quote (ipg.vendorreg.com) 6. Prepare or submit information to Grantor's point of contact in Exhibit D. 7. Obtain authorization from Grantor's point of contact provided on Exhibit D. 8. All applicable forms must be approved prior to awarding the contract. 3. Employment of Grantor Personnel -- The Grantee will not employ any person or persons currently employed by the Grantor for any work required by the terms of this Agreement. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 33 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 Reporting_ Grantee agrees to submit periodic financial and performance reporting on the approved IDOT BOBS 2832 form. Grantee shall file Quarterly BOBS 2832 reports with Grantor describing the expenditure(s) of the funds and performance measures related thereto. The first BOBS 2832 report shall cover the reporting period after the 01/01/2023 effective date of the Agreement. Quarterly reports must be submitted no later than 30 calendar days following the period covered by the report. For the purpose of reconciliation, the Grantee must submit a BOBS 2832 report for the period ending 12/31 (Grantee's Fiscal Year End date). A BOBS 2832 report marked as "Final Report" must be submitted to the Grantor 60 days after the end date of the Agreement. Failure to submit the required BOBS 2832 reports may cause a delay or suspension of funding. The Grantee must submit a BOBS 2832 report for the period ending 9/30 - Federal Fiscal Year End Grantee shall submit to Grantor a BOBS 2832 report for the period ending September 30 within 30 calendar days of the end of the Federal Fiscal Year. ® Renewal. This Agreement may not be renewed. FEDERALLY FUNDED AGREEMENTS Standard Assurances. The Grantee assures that it will comply with all applicable federal statues, regulations, executive orders, U.S. DOT regulations, U.S. DOT regulations and other federal requirements in carrying out any project supported by federal funds. The Grantee recognizes that federal laws, regulations, policies and administrative practices may be modified from time to time and those modifications may affect project implementation. The Grantee agrees that the most recent federal requirements will apply to the project as authorized by 49 U.S.C. chapter 53 and Title 23, United States Code (Highways), as amended by Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP -21), the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), the SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act of 2008, or other federal laws. Nondiscrimination Assurance. As required by 49 U.S.C. 5332 (which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age, and prohibits discrimination in employment or business opportunity), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000d, and U.S. DOT regulations, "Nondiscrimination in Federally - Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation --Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act," 49 CFR Part 21 at 21.7, the Grantee assures that it will comply with all requirements of 49 CFR Part 21, and other applicable directives, so that no person in the United States, on the basis of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, or age will be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination in any program or activity (particularly in the level and quality of transportation services and transportation -related benefits) for which the Grantee receives federal assistance. Specifically, during the period in which federal assistance is extended to the project, or project property is used for a purpose for which the federal assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, or as long as the Grantee retains ownership or possession of the project property, whichever is longer, the rantee assures that: 1. Each project will be conducted, property acquisitions will be undertaken, and project facilities will be operated in accordance with all applicable requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5332 and 49 CFR Part 21, and understands that this assurance extends to its entire facility and to facilities operated in connection with the project. 2. It will promptly take the necessary actions to effectuate this assurance, including notifying the public that complaints of discrimination in the provision of transportation -related services or benefits may be filed with U.S. DOT. Upon request by U.S. DOT, the Grantee assures that it will submit the required information pertaining to its compliance with these requirements. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 34 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 3. It will include in each subagreement, property transfer agreement, third party contract, third party subcontract, or participation agreement adequate provisions to extend the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5332 and 49 CFR Part 21 to other parties involved therein including any subrecipient, transferee, third party contractor, third party subcontractor at any level, successor in interest, or any other participant in the project. 4. Should it transfer real property, structures, or improvements financed with federal assistance to another party, any deeds and instruments recording the transfer of that property shall contain a covenant running with the land assuring nondiscrimination for the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the federal assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. 5. The United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Act, regulations, and this assurance. 6. It will make any changes in its 49 U.S.C. 5332 and Title VI implementing procedures as U.S. DOT may request. Control of Property. The Grantee certifies that the control, utilization and disposition of property or equipment acquired using federal funds is maintained according to the provisions of OMB Circular A 102 , 49 CFR Part 18.32, and all other applicable Federal requirements. Cost Principles. The cost principles of this Agreement are governed by the cost principles found in 49 CFR Part 18.22 and 2 CFR Part 225, "Cost Principles for State, local or Indian tribal governments", and all costs included in this Agreement are allowable under 49 CFR Part 18.22 and 2 CFR Part 225, "Cost Principles for State, local or Indian tribal governments". Additionally, 2 CFR Part 225 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for Federal awards carried out through grants and other agreements with state and local governments, and should be reviewed for further guidance on cost principles. Debarment. The Grantee shall comply with Debarment provisions as contained in 2 CFR Part 1200, as amended. The Grantee certifies that to the best of its knowledge and belief, the Grantee and the Grantee's principals: a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; b) within a three-year period preceding this Agreement have not been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against it for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a public (federal, state or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction, violation of federal or state anti-trust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements or receiving stolen property; c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in subsection (b) above; and d) have not within a three-year period preceding this Agreement had one or more public transactions (federal, state or local) terminated for cause or default. The inability of the Grantee to certify to the certification in this section will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this Agreement. The Grantee shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification in this section. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the Grantor determined whether to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the Grantee knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the federal government, the Grantor may terminate this Agreement for cause. The Grantee shall provide immediate written notice to the Grantor if at any time the Grantee learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "lower tier covered transaction," "participant," "person," "primary covered transaction," "principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this Part shall have the meaning set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of the rules implementing Executive Order 12549. The Grantee agrees that it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized, in writing, by the Grantor. The Grantee agrees that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the Grantor, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. The State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 35 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 Grantee may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless the Grantee knows the certification is erroneous. The Grantee may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. The Grantee may, but is not required to, check the Non -procurement List. If the Grantee knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation, in addition to other remedies available to the federal government, the Grantor may terminate this Aqreement for cause or default. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this section. The knowledge and information of the Grantee is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. Drug Free Workplace.The Grantee certifies that it will comply with the requirements of the federal Drug Free Workplace Act, 41 U.S.C. 702 as amended, and 49 CFR 32. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise A:5surance. In accordance with 49 CFR 26.13(a), as amended, the Grantee assures that it shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the implementation of the project and in the award and performance of any third party contract, or subagreement supported with Federal assistance derived from the U.S. DOT or in the administration of its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26, as amended. The Grantee assures that it shall take all necessary and reasonable steps set forth in 49 CFR Part 26, as amended, to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of all third party contracts and subagreements supported with Federal assistance derived from the U.S. DOT. The Grantee DBE program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26, as amended, will be incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement for any Federal assistance awarded by FHWA or U.S. DOT. Implementation of this DBE program is a legal obligation of the Grantee, and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of the Agreement. Upon notification by the Federal Government or the Gratee to the Grantee of its failure to implement its approved DBE program, the U.S. DOT may impose sanctions as provided for under 49 CFR Part 26, as amended, and may in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001, as amended, and/or the Program Fraud Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq., as amended. Assurance of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability. As required by U.S. DOT regulations, "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial Assistance," at 49 CFR 27.9, the Grantee assures that, as a condition to the approval or extension of any Federal assistance awarded by FHWA to construct any facility, obtain any rolling stock or other equipment, undertake studies, conduct research, or to participate in or obtain any benefit from any program administered by FHWA, no otherwise qualified person with a disability shall be, solely by reason of that disability, excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any program or activity receiving or benefiting from Federal assistance administered by the FHWA or any entity within U.S. DOT. The Grantee assures that project implementation and operations so assisted will comply with all applicable requirements of U.S. DOT regulations implementing the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 794, et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq., and implementing U.S. DOT regulations at 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and 38, and any applicable regulations and directives issued by other Federal departments or agencies. Procurement Compliance Certification. The Grantee certifies that its procurements and procurement system will comply with all applicable third party procurement requirements of Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and requirements, as amended and revised. The Grantee certifies that it will include in its contracts financed in whole or in part with U.S. DOT or FHWA assistance all clauses required by Federal laws, executive orders, or regulations, and will ensure that each subrecipient and each contractor will also include in its subagreements and its contracts financed in whole or in part with U.S. DOT or FHWA assistance all applicable clauses required by Federal laws, executive orders, or regulations. Intelligent Transportation Systems Program. As used in this assurance, the term Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) project is defined to include any project that in whole or in part finances the acquisition of technologies or systems of technologies that provide or significantly contribute to the provision of one or more ITS user services as defined in the "National ITS Architecture." State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 36 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 1. Grantee assures it will comply with 23 U.S.C. 517(d), as amended by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP -21 )and other federal requirements that may be issued in connection with any ITS project it undertakes financed with Highway Trust Funds (including funds from the mass transit account) or funds made available for the Intelligent Transportation Systems Program. 2. With respect to any ITS project financed with Federal assistance derived from a source other than Highway Trust Funds (including funds from the Mass Transit Account) or 23 U.S.C. 517(d), the Grantee assures that is will use its best efforts to ensure that any ITS project it undertakes will not preclude interface with other intelligent transportation systems in the Region. Davis -Bacon Act. To the extent applicable, the Grantee will comply with the Davis -Bacon Act, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 3141 et seq., the Copeland "Anti -Kickback" Act, as amended, 18 U.S.C. 874, and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 3701 et seq., regarding labor standards for federally assisted subagreements. Certifications and Assurances Required by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (SF 424B and SF 424D). As required by OMB, the Grantee certifies that it: 1. Has the legal authority and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project. 2. Will give the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, the Comptroller General of the United States, and, if appropriate, the state, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives; 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest or personal gain; 4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable project time periods; 5. Will comply with all applicable Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination including, but not limited to: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000d, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin; • Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1681 through 1683, and 1685 through 1687, and U.S. DOT regulations, "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance," 49 CFR Part 25, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex; • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U S.C. 794, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap; • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6101 through 6107, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; • The Drug Abuse, Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act, Public Law 92-255, and amendments thereto, 21 U.S.C. 1101 et seq. relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; • The Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, Public Law 91 616, and amendments thereto, 42 U.S.C. 4541 et seq. relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; • The Public Health Service Act of 1912, as amended, 42 U S.C. 290dd-2 related to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; • Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental, or financing of housing; • Any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statutes under which Federal assistance for the project may be provided including, but not limited, to 49 U.S.C. 5332, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age, and prohibits discrimination in employment or business opportunity, and Section 1101 (b) of SAFETEA-LU, and 23 U.S.C. 101 note, which provides for participation of disadvantaged business enterprises in transportation -related programs; and • Any other nondiscrimination statute(s) that may apply to the project. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 37 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 6. Will comply with all federal environmental standards applicable to the project, including but not limited to: • Institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and Executive Order 11514; • Notification of violating facilities pursuant to Executive Order 11738; • Protection of wetlands pursuant to Executive Order 11990; • Evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with Executive Order 11988; • Assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.; • Conformity of federal Actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.; • Protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended; • Protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended; • The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, 16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq., which relates to protecting components or potential components of the national wild scenic rivers system; and • Environmental impact and related procedures pursuant to 23 C.F.R. Part 771. 7. Will comply with all other federal statutes applicable to the project, including but not limited to: • Title II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, which provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced whose property is acquired as a result of federal or federally - assisted programs; • The Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 1501-1508 and 7324-7328, which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with federal funds; • The Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, which requires the purchase of flood insurance in certain instances; • Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, 16 U S.C. 4 70; • Executive Order 11593, which relates to identification and protection of historic properties; • The Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974, 16 U.S.C. 469a-1 et seq.; • The Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq., which relates to the care, handling, and treatment of warm-blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other activities supported by a federal award of assistance; • The Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act, 42 U.S.C. 4801 et seq., which relates to prohibiting the use of lead- based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures; • The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations"; and • Use of parks, recreation areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic sites pursuant to 23 C.F.R. Part 774 (Section 4(f) requirements). Energy Conservation. To the extent applicable, the Grantee and its third party contractors at all tiers shall comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency that are contained in applicable state energy conservation plans issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6321 et seq. Eligibility For Employment In The United States. The Grantee shall complete and keep on file, as appropriate, Immigration and Naturalization Service Employment Eligibility Forms (1-9). These forms shall be used by the Grantee to verify that persons employed by the Grantee are eligible to work in the United States. Buy America. As set forth in 49 U.S.0 5323U) and 49 C.F.R. Part 661, only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States may be purchased with Federal funds unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestic purchases would be inconsistent with the public interest; that such materials are not reasonably available and of satisfactory quality; or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of overall project contract by more than 25 percent. Clear justification for the purchase of non-domestic items must be in the form of a waiver request submitted to and approved by the Secretary of Transportation. Changed Conditions Affecting Performance. The Grantee shall immediately notify the Grantor of any change in conditions or local law, or of any other event which may significantly affect its ability to perform the Project in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 38 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 Third Party Disputes Or Breaches. The Grantee agrees to pursue all legal rights available to it in the enforcement or defense of any third party contract, and FHWA or U.S. DOT and the Grantor reserve the right to concur in any compromise or settlement of any third party contract claim involving the Grantee. The Grantee will notify FHWA or U.S. DOT and the Grantor of any current or prospective major dispute pertaining to a third party contract. If the Grantee seeks to name the Grantor as a party to the litigation, the Grantee agrees to inform both FHWA or U.S. DOT and the Grantor before doing so. The Grantor retains a right to a proportionate share of any proceeds derived from any third party recovery. Unless permitted otherwise by the Grantor, the Grantee will credit the Project Account with any liquidated damages recovered. Nothing herein is intended to nor shall it waive U.S. DOT's, FHWA's or the Grantor's immunity to suit. Fly America. Grantee will comply with 49 U.S.C. §40118, 4 CFR §52 and U.S. GAO Guidelines B- 138942, 1981 U.S. Comp. Gen. LEXIS 2166, March 31, 1981 regarding costs of international air transportation by U.S. Flag air carriers. PPreference for Recycled Products. To the extent applicable, the Grantee agrees to give preference to the purchase of recycled products for use in this Agreement pursuant to the various U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines, "Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines for Products Containing Recovered Materials," 40 CFR Part 247, which implements section 6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6962. rgo Preference - Use of United States Flag Vessels. The Grantee agrees to comply with 46 U.S.C.§ 55305 and 46 R Part 381 and to insert the substance of those regulations in all applicable subcontracts issued pursuant to this reement, to the extent those regulations apply to this Agreement. REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 39 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124D075-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 Agreement No. 23-1439-38782 PART THREE - THE PROJECT -SPECIFIC TERMS In addition to the uniform requirements in PART ONE and the Grantor -Specific Terms in PART TWO, the Grantor has the following additional requirements for this project: None Identified. State of Illinois GRANT AGREEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2023 / 1 18 22 Page 40 of 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 1124DO75-FF34-4A52-ABC1-0143F33729A6 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE State Agency: Illinois Department- of Transportation Organization Name: yq!NL2t Mount Prospect Notice of Funding 1439-1327 Data Universal Number System (DUNS) Number (enter numbers only) 069507697 Opportunity (NOFO) Number: Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA) Number: 1494-00-1439 CSFA Short Description: Statewide Planning and Research Funds Section A: State of Illinois Funds Fiscal Year:°FY23 of Illinois Grant Requested Fringe Benefits ravel Equipment n--'- ­ ' C Sull�)o�tes 6. Contractual Services and Subawards _ 7. Consultant (Professional Service} 8. Construction 9. Occupancy (Rent and Utilities) O. Research and Development (R&D) 11. Telecommunications 12. Training and Education i"b­ irect —Administrative Costs - 1 14. Miscellaneous Costs 15. k —Grant Exclusive Line —1tem(s) 15. B. Grant Exclusive Line Item(s) 16. Total Direct Costs (add lines 1-1-5) 17. Total Indirect Costs Rate %: EMM&WOM E 0141113 Uniform Guidance 200.430 200.431 200.474 200.439 Q111 Z2 � V1= � X-1-01- 0'00.465 20087 $ as= H 0�1# I #�f I Instructions found at end of 280,000.00 1 document, GOMBGATU-30024R-02-171 Page 1of24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE Organization Name: of Mount Prospect NOFO Number, 1439-1327 ?ECTION A - Continued - Indirect Cost Rate Information If your organization is requesting reimbursement for indirect costs on line 17 of the Budget Summary, please select one of the following options 1 . Our Organization receives direct Federal funding and currently has a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) with our Federal Cognizan"'. Agency. A copy of this agreement will be provided to the State of Illinois' Indirect Cost Unit for review and documentation before reimbursement 141 allowed. This NICRA will be accepted by all State of Illinois agencies up to any statutory, rule-based or programmatic restrictions or limitations. NOTE: (if this option is selected, please, provide basic Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement in area designated below.) Tour organization may not have a Federally Negotiated Cost Rate Agreement- Therefore, in order for your organization to be reimbursed for the In, Costs from the State of Illinois your organization must either: Petr t 10=11FRI11 * . . . . I 'I * I , * I . s. I , * 2a. Our Organizations currently has a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) with the State of Illinois that will be accepted by all State of, Illinois agencies up to any statutory. rule-based or programmatic restrictions or limitations. Our Organization is required to submit a new Indirect Cost Rate Proposal to the Indirect Cost Unit within 6 months after the close of each fiscal year [2 CFR 200, Appendix IV(C)(2)(c)]. NOTE: (if this option is:'r selected, please provide basic Indirect Cost Rate information in area designated below.) ;15 M HIM 111� 1 11 Lzrj"- isjolti.14 W Kim 411 11[ tal LIM C W 1714-7 -VI miff Period Covered by NIGRA- From: 70 Indirect Cost Rate: % The Distribution Base Is: GOMBGATU- 3002-(R-02-17) Page 2 of 24 GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 3 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE Organization Name: Village of Mount Prospect NOFO Number: 1432931327 S ection B: Non -State of Illinois Funds Fiscal Year: F23 i 'REVENUES Total Revenue Grantee Match Reguirement W. LAgency to Populate' b) Cash $ 1 c) Non -Cash $ 'djl other Funding and Contributions $ [Total Non -State Funds (lined b through d) Bud Expenditure CateDriesFederal OMB Uniform Guidance Total Expenditures Awards Reference 2 CFR 200 1 Personnel (Salaries and Wages) 200A30 2. Fringe Benefits 200,431 I Travel 250.474 $ 4. Equipment 2.49 $ 5. Supplies 200.94 $ 6. Contractual Services and Subawards 20;x,318 & 2.2 $ 7. Consultant (Professional Services'200.459 70,000.001 8. Construction $ 9, Occupancy 'Rent and Utilities)$ 200.465 10. Research and Development (R&D( 200.87 $ 11. Telecommunications 12. Training and Education 200.472 $ 113- Direct Administrative Costs 200.413 (c) $ 14. Miscellaneous Costs $ 15. A, Grant Exclusive tine ftem(sl , 15, B, Grant Exclusive Line Items) 16. Total Direct Costs (add lines 1®15) 200,413 $ i 70,000,00 17. Total indirect Costs 200.414 $ Rate %: Base: '18- Total Costs State G --rant Funds - fines 16 and 17) 70,00000_ LMUST Eo_u_ALREVENUE TOTALS ABOVE GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 3 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE Organization Narne:Village of Mount Prospect NOFO Number: 1439-1327 Data Universal Number System (DUNS) Number (enter numbers only) -. 069507697 Fiscal Year. FY21 Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA) Number: CSFA Short Description:Statewide Planning and Research Funds By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete and accurate and that any false, fictitious or fraudulent information or the omission of any material fact could result in the immediate termination of my grant award(s). ZEUMMIX-=- 1 1[02�1=1#fficer or equivalent): Village of Mount Prospect InstitUti6ri/Organization Name Director of Public Works AliAo) 06 kW14 inar=� o(r'equivalent): .March 30, 2022 Date of Execution (Chief Financial Officer) - Note: The State Awarding Agency may change required signers based on the grantees organizational structure. The required signers must have the authority to enter onto contractual agreements on the behalf of the organization. GON8GATU-3W2-(R-02-17) Page 4 of 24 0 0 0 C: W State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE < M CD 0 '0 FFATA Data Collection Form (if needed by agency) CD Under FFATA, aff sub -recipients who receive $30,000 or more must provide the following information for federal reporting. Please fill out the following form accurately and completely. FZdGgit extension if applicable: Sub -recipient DUNS: 069507697 Sub -recipient Parent Company DUNS: C) y J I Sub -recipient Name: Villa2e of Mount Prospect _T1 L§ub-recipient DBA Name: > Sub-reci ient Street Address: 50 S. Emerson St > City: Mount Prospect Zip -code: 60056 ressional District: 8,9,10 State: IL 'Con2 Sub -recipient Principal Place of Performance: 50 S. Emerson St o City: Mount Prospect J State, IL Zip -Code: 60056 Congressional District: 8,9,10 ' Contract Number (if known): ;Award Amount: 'Project Period: From: Project Period: To: I -4 > $280,0000 Jan 1, 2023 12/31/2024 State of Illinois Awarding Agency and Project Detail Description: Illinois Department of Transportation. The project for which the Village is requesting funding will be a planning study to gather existing conditions, evaluate alternatives, develop cost estimates, and prioritize future bike infrastructure projects for 14 arterial roadways. Upon completion, the Village will have a comprehensive study that i provides a path forward to making Mount Prospect a well-known, biking community LMunit for the benefit of our residents and the region. Under certain circumstances, sub -recipient must provide names and total compensation of its top 6 highly compensated officials. Please answer the following questions and ifollow the instructions. ,Q1. In your business or organization's previous fiscal year, did your business or organization (including parent organization, all branches and affiliates worldwide) receive {1) 80% or more of your annual gross revenues in U.S. federal contracts, subcontracts, loans, grants, subgrants and/or cooperative agreements and (2) $25,000,000 or ,more in annual gross revenue from U.S. federal contracts, subcontracts, loans, grants, subgrants and/or cooperative agreements? Yes L] If Yes, must answer Q2 below. No 7 If No, you are not required to provide data. 'd2. Does the public have access to information about the compensation of the senior executives in your business or organization (including parent organization, all 'branches and all affiliates worldwide) through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Security Exchange Act of 1934 (5 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 16104 of the Internal Revenue code of 1986 (i.e., on IRS Form 990)? Yes No If No, you must provide the data. Please fill out the rest of this form. !Please provide names and total compensation of the top five officials: 1 Name Amount: Name: Amount: Name- Amount: Name: Amount: Name: Amount: GOMBGATU-300248-02-17) Page 5 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 1). Personnel (Salaries and Wages) (2 CFR 200.430) List each position by title and name of employee, if available. Show the annual salary rate and the percentage of time to be devoted to the project and length :o© on the project. Compensation paid for employees engaged in grant activities must be consistent with that paid for similar work within the applicant orgaoftimenization. Include a description of the responsibilities and duties of each position in relationship to fulfilling the project goals and objectives in the narrative space provided below. Also, provide a justification and description of each position (including vacant positions). Relate each smsition sojecificallp to � �rwram ob"jectives. Personnelcann"711477=M 100% of their time on all active projects. GOMBGATU-3002411-02-117) Page 6 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 2). Fringe Benefits (2 CFR 200.431) Fringe benefits should be based on actual known costs or an established formula. Fringe benefits are for the personnel listed in category (1) direct salaries and wages, and only for the percentage of time devoted to the project. Provide the fringe benefit rate used and a clear description of how the computation of fringe benefits was done. Provide both the annual (for multiyear awards) and total. If a fringe benefit rate is not used, show how the fringe benefits were computed for each position, The budget justification should be reflected in the budget description. Elements that comprise fringe benefits should be indicated. Fringe Benefit Add/Delete Name Position(s) Base Rate Cost Rows Add State Total Add Delete T Non -State Total Total Fringe Benefitsj: 7F-6rige Benefits Narrative (State) - Fringe Benefits Narrative (Non -State). (i.e. "Match' or 'Other Funding"I GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 7 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 3). Travel (2 CFR 200474) Travel should include: origin and destination, estimated costs and type of transportation, number of travelers, related lodging and per them costs, briefdescription ofthe travel involved, its purpose, and explanation of how the proposed travel is necessary for successful completion of the project. In training projects, travel and meals for trainees should be listed separately. Show the number of trainees and unit cost involved. Identify the location of travel, if known; or if unknown, indicate "location to be determined." Indicate source of Travel Policies applied, Applicant or State of Illinois Travel Regulations. NOTE: Dollars requested in the travel category should be for staff travel only. Travel for consultants should be shown in the consultant category along with the consultant's fee. Travel for training participants, advisory committees, review panels and etc., should be itemized the same way as indicated above and placed in the "Miscellaneous" category. GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 8 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 4). Equipment (2 CFR 21?ii.439) Provide justification for the use of each item and relate them to specific program objectives. Provide both the annual (for multiyear awards) and total for equipment. Equipment is defined as an article of tangible personal property that has a useful life of more than one year and a per-unit acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level established by the non -Federal entity for financial statement purposes, or $5,000. An applicant organization may classify equipment at a lower dollar value but cannot classify it higher than $5,000, (Note: Organization's own capitalization policy for classification of eaUiDment can be used), Applicants should analyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leasing equipment, especially high cost items and those subject to rapid technical advances, Rented or leased equipment costs should be listed in the "Contractual" category. Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project. Attach a narrative describing the procurement method to be used. T T 1 Item Quantity Cost Per Item Equipment Add/Delete Cost Rows r..... ......... add Delete State Totals j . .... .......... Add Delete Non -State Total it Total Equipment fi Equipment Narrative (State): "'Eiq-61pment Narrative _(Non-Statey. (i.e, "'Watch" or "Other Funding") GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 9 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 5). Supplies (2 CFR 200.94) List items by type (office supplies, Postage, training materials, copying paper, and other expendable items such as books, hard held tape recorders) and show the basis for computation. Generally, supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the project. Supplies add/Delete Item 1Quantity/Duration Cost Per Item ICost leo ws Add j Delete State Total_ i _ Add Delete Tori -State Total Total Supplies i Supplies Narrative (State)_ Supplies Narrative (Non -State): . (i.e. "li atch" or "Other Funding") GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 10 of 24 0 6). Contractual Services (2 CFR 200.318) & Subawards (200-92) State of f Provide a description of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate of the cast. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in awarding contracts. A separate justification must be provided for sole contracts in excess of $154,000 (See 2 CFR 200.88). NOTE : this budget category may include subawards. Provide separate budgets for each subaward or contract, regardless of the dollar value and indicate the basis for the cast estimates in the narrative. Describe products or services to be obtained and indicate the applicability or necessity of each to the project. Please also note the differences between subaward, contract, and contractor (vendor): 1) Subaward (240.92) means an award provided by a pass-through entity to a sub -recipient for the sub -recipient to carry out part of a Federal/State award_ including a portion of the scope of work or objectives. It does not include payments to a contractor or payments to an individual that is a beneficiary of a FederalfState program. 2) Contract (200.22) means a legal Instrument by which a non -Federal entity purchases property or services needed to carry out the project or program under a Federal award. The term as used in this part does not include a legal Instrument; even if the non -Federal entity considers it a contract, when the substance of the transaction meets the definition of a Federal award or subaward. 3) 'Vendor' or "Contractor" is generally a dealer, distributor or other seller that provides supplies, expendable materials, or data processing services in support of the project activities. GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 11 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 7). Consultant Services and Expenses (2 CFR 200;459) Consultant Services (Fees): For each consultant enter the name, if known, service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (8 -hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant Expenses: List all expenses to be paid from the grant to the individual consultant in addition to their fees (i.e., travel, meals, lodging, etc.) Consultant— Indicate whether applicants- -formal, written Procurement Policy or the Federal Acquisitions Policy is used. Consultant Services Consultant Service (Fees} ) Services Provided Fee Basis Quantity Add/Delete (Fee) Cost Row TBD Planning Study $280,000.00 000.0 $280, Add ! Delete Po Add ---------- L --Delete Add State Total I $280,000.00 TBD 1 Planning Study $70,000.001 $70,000.00 1 Add Delete t.�Delete d I t Add Delete NON -State Total $70 000.00 Total Consultant Services (Fees) $350,000.00' Consultant Services Narrative (State): A comprehensive study that provides a path forward to fund, design and construct a connected bike network on all Village arterial roadways. 1 Consultant Services Narrative (Non -State): A comprehensive study that provides a path forward to fund, design and construct a connected bike network on all Village arterial roadways. ' Consultant Expenses - Items Location Cost Rate Basis Quantity 'Number ofConsultant Expenses' Add/Delete Trips .......... ..... . Cost Row Delete State Total Add Delete GOMBGATU-3002-(R-0297) Page 12 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 13 of 24 0 0 C') C: m CDs CD State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 8). Construction Provide a description of the construction project and an estimate of the costs. As a rule, construction costs are not allowable unless with prior written approval. In some cases, minor repairs or renovations may be allowable. Consult With the program office before budgeting funds in this category. Estimated construction costs must be supported by documentation including drawings and estimates, formal bids, etc. As with all other costs, follow the specific requirements of the program, the terms and conditions of the award, and applicable regulations. Construction Add/Delete Purpose Description of Work Cost Rows Add Constriction Delete State Total Construction Add Delete I Non -State iota! i otal Construction Construction Narrative (State': Constru- action Narrative 'Non-C-StateY fi.e. "Match" or "Other Funding"! GOMBGATU-3002JR-02-17) Page 14 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 9). Occupancy - Rent and Utilities (2 CFR 200,465) List items and descriptions by major type and the basis of the computation. Explain how rental and utility expenses are allocated for distribution as an expense to the program/service. For example, provide the square footage and the cost per square foot rent and utility, and provide a monthly rental and utility cost and how many months to rent. NOTE: This budgetary line item is to be used for direct program rent and utilities, all other indirect or administrative occupancy costs should be listed in the indirect expense section of the Budget worksheet and narrative. Maintenance and repair costs may be included here if directly allocated to program. Occupancy I Add/Delete Description Quantity Basis Cost I Length of Time 1 Cost Row Add Delete State Total Add Delete NON -State Total Total Occupancy - Rent and Utilities Occupancy - Rent and Utilities Narrative [State)., Occupancy - Rent and Utilities Narrative (Non -State): {i.e.. "Match" or "Other Funding") GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) x Page 15 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE Definition: All research activities, both basic and applied, and all development activities that are performed by non -Federal entities directed toward the production of useful materials, devices, systems, or methods, including design and development of prototypes and processes. Provide a description of the research and development GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 16 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE o 11). Telecommunications List items and descriptions by major type and the basis of the computation. Explain how telecommunication expenses are allocated for distribution as an expense to the program/service. NOTE, This budgetary line item is to be used for direct program telecommunications, all other indirect or administrative telecommunication costs should be listed in the indirect expense section of the Budget worksheet and narrative, . ..... . ..... i Description Quantity Basis Cost Length of Time TTelecommunications Add/Delete Cost Row Add Delete State Total .E Add Delete 1, Delete NON -State Total Total Telecommunications Telecommunications Narrative (State): Telecommunications Narrative (Non -State): (i.e. atc or "Other Funding") GOMBGATU-3002- R-02-17) Page 17 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 12). Training and Education (2 CFR 200.472) Describe the training and education cost associated with employee development. Include rental space for training ;if required), training materials, speaker fees, substitute teacher fees, and any other applicable expenses related to the training. When training materials (pamphlets, notebooks, videos, and other various handouts) are ordered for specific training activities, these items should be itemized below. Description Quantity Basis Cost Length of Time Training and � Add/Delete Education Cost Row Add Delete i State Total Add Delete NON -State Total Total Training and Education I Training and Education Narrative (State{: 1 Training and Educahon Narrative Non -State): (i.e. Watch" or"OtherFunding"' i GQM113GATU-3002-{R-02-17j Rage 18 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 13). Direct Administrative Costs (2 CFR 200.413 (q)) The salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect (F&A) costs. Direct charging of these costs may be appropriate only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) Administrative or clerical services are integral to a project or activity; (2) Individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity, (3) Such costs are exolicitly included-inthe. budget or have the prior written approval of the State awardiag_agg_np,y; and (4) The costs are not also recovered as indirect costs. Basis Direct Administrative Add/Delete Name Position Salary or Wage % of Time Length of Time (Yr./Mo./Hr.) Cost Row Add % Delete State Total Add Delete NON -State Total Total Direct Administrative Costs Direct Administrative Costs Narrative (State) irect Administrative Casts narrative on- tate (.e. atch or t er Funding" GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 19 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 14). Other or Miscellaneous Costs This category contains items not included in the previous categories. List items by type of material or nature of expense, break down costs by quantity and cost per unit if applicable, state the necessity of other costs for successful completion of the project and exclude unallowable costs (e.g.. Printing, Memberships & subscriptions, recruiting costs, etc,) ------------ Description Quantity Basis Cost Length of Time Other or Add/Delete Miscellaneous Cost Row Add _Delete State Total T � Add Delete NON -State Total Total Other or Miscellaneous Costs Other or Miscellaneous Costs Narrative (State): Other or Miscellaneous CostsNarrative(No'n-St'ate)-, (i.e. "Match" or "Other Funding") GOMBGATU-30024R-02-17) Page 20 of 24 15). GRANT EXCLUSIVE LINE IT State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE Grant Exclusive Line Item Description: Costs directly related to the service or activity of the program that is an integral line item for budgetary purposes. To use this budgetary line item, an appricant must have Program approval. (Please cite reference per statute for unique costs directly related to the service or activity of the program). (Note: Use columns within table as needed for the item being reported. Leave blank those columns that are not applicable. This table does NOT auto -calculate each line. You must enter the line totals. The table will auto -calculate the State, Non -State, and Total Grant Exclusive Line Item amounts based on your line entries, The State, Non -State and Total Grant Exclusive Line Item amounts will NOT carry forward to the Budget Narrative Summary table. You MI have to enter the State and Non -State Totals for ALL Grant Exclusive Line Items in the Budget Narrative Summary table. Use the "Add New Grant Exclusive Line Item" button below to add additional tables as needed.) Description Quantity Basis Cost Length of Tim Grant Exclusive Line Item Cost Add/Deletee Row .............. State Total Add Delet:e:::� Add Relete NON -State Total Total Grant Exclusive Line Item Grant Exclusive Line Item Narrative (State): Grant Exclusive Line Item Narrative (Non -State): (i.e. "Match" or "Other Funding") Add New Grant Exclusive Line Item delete Grant Exclusive Line Item GOMBGATU-30024R.02-17) Page 21 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE 16). Indirect Cost (2 CFR 200.414) Provide the most recent indirect cost rate agreement information with the itemized budget. The applicable indirect cost rate(s) negotiated by the organization with the cognizant negotiating agency must be used in computing indirect costs (F&A) for a program budget. The amount for indirect costs should be calculated by applying the current negotiated indirect cost rate(s) to the approved base(s). After the amount of indirect costs is determined for the program, a breakdown of the indirect costs should be provided in the budget worksheet and narrative below. Description Base Rate Indirect Cost = Add/Delete Rows _AddDelete l�j State Total . . . . ......... . Add Delete Non -State Total Total Indirect Costs Indirect Costs Narrative (State): Indirect Costs Narrative (Non -State): GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 22 of 24 State of Illinois UVIFQRlf C12AMIJIU-0-GET TFJ fFLATE Budget Narrative Summary—When you have completed the budget worksheet, transfer the totals for each category to the spaces below to the uniform template provided (SECTION A & B). Verify the total costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amount of State requested funds and the amount of non -State funds that will support the project.. (Note: The State, Non -State, and Total cost amounts for each line item below are auto -filled based upon the entries in the preceding budget tables 1-14 and 16. The State and Non -State Total amounts from Table 15 above, Grant Exclusive Line Item(s), must be entered into this table by hand due to the possibility of there being more than one Grant Exclusive Line Item table. Once the Grant Exclusive Line Item(s) amounts are entered into this table, the State Request amount, Non -State Amount and the Total Project Costs will be calculated automatically. It is imperative that the summary tables be completed accurately for the Budget Narrative Summary to be accurate.) GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 23 of 24 State of Illinois UNIFORM GRANT BUDGET TEMPLATE Grantee: Village of Mount Prospect --- Notice of Funding 1439-1327 Data Universal Number System (DUNS) Number (enter numbers only) : 069507697 Opportunity (NOFO) Number: r - Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA) Number: '1494-00-1439 CSFA Short Description: Statewide Planning and Research Funds Fiscal Year(s): FY23 - FY25 2101111-1 �7-011mm Checklist: N/A Final Budget Amount Approved: $280,000.00 Program Approval Name Program Approval Signature Date -M.Ealiy SQ16d D4--ne S -,k Dianne Seck Dianne Seck Daw 2022. i 2 16 14 r5 40 �05WV 12/16/2022 Fiscal & Administrative Approval Name Fiscal & Administrative Approval Signature Date Budget Revision Approved: Program Approval Name Program Approval Signature Date Fiscal & Administrative Approval Signature Fiscal & Administrative Approval Signature Date 247171 a =I- A -M# GOMBGATU-3002-(R-02-17) Page 24 of 24 MAYOR Paul Wm. Hoefert TRUSTEES Vincent J. Dante Agostino Filippone Terri Gens William A. Grossi John Matuszak Colleen E. Saccotelli DATE: June 9, 2023 VILLAGE MANAGER Michael J. Cassady Mount Prospect DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Sean Dorsey Phone: 847/870-5640 Fax: 847/253-9377 www.mountprospect.org Village of Mount Prospect Public Works 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Request for Statement of Qualifications FROM: Matthew Lawrie, P.E. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department RE: Request for Statement of Qualifications Arterial Bike Network Study The Village of Mount Prospect seeks Statement of Qualifications from engineering firms for engineering and planning services to develop an Arterial Bike Network Study for the Village. Attached to this memo are: 1. A list of materials and information that should be included with your Statement of Qualifications (Exhibit A). 2. A general definition of the scope of work and requirements for your submittal (Exhibit B). 3. The evaluation process and tentative schedule (Exhibit C). 4. A list of key corridors, destinations, and connections (Exhibit D). 5. An aerial map identifying key corridors to be evaluated (Exhibit E). 6. Village Bicycle Plan (attached separately). Your Statement of Qualifications should be emailed to the following address and received no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 30, 2023. Mr. Jason Leib Deputy Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect ileib@mountprospect.org wp�mii Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 2 Exhibit A Requirements for Statement of Qualifications Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Arterial Bike Network Study Your Statement of Qualifications should include the following information: 1. Name, address and brief history of firm. 2. Organizational chart and resumes of key personnel to be assigned to this project. 3. Related experience during the last five (5) years. For example: a. Engineering and planning services for bicycle improvements resulting in actionable plans for bike improvements on State, County, and local roads. b. Phase I and Phase II Engineering services for bike improvements. c. Experience working with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways (CCDoTH), Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), Canadian National Railroad (CN), Commonwealth Edison (ComEd) and private property owners on pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure projects. d. Experience working with multiple interest groups including municipalities, state agencies, residents and businesses. Emphasis will be placed on effective communication tools and the ability to build consensus. 4. Description of process to accomplish the required tasks of the project. This should include: a. An understanding of the project. b. Objectives to be met as part of the project. c. Your approach to completing the project. d. A project schedule. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 3 Exhibit B General Scope of Work Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Arterial Bike Network Study A strategic goal of the Village of Mount Prospect is to implement a complete bike network that provides the community a viable and safe alternative mode of transportation. The Village Bicycle Study, adopted in 2012, identifies three infrastructure phases. Phase I includes on -street bike routes along low volume, residential streets that connect to key destinations such as parks, schools, shopping, restaurants, and adjacent communities. Phases 11 & III includes bike routes along arterial roads, often under thejurisdiction of other agencies, that will provide connections to Phase I routes and adjacent communities. Since 2012, the Village has installed 28 miles of on -street bike routes completing Phase I of the Bike Plan. This new study will develop a strategy to construct bike facilities along arterial and other high traffic streets in the Village, completing the planning for Phases 11 and III of the Bike Plan. It will also consider constructing paths along railroad, utility, park district and private property as necessary to make needed connections to create a holistic network for the Village. The study will serve as a guide to complete future federal Phase I & Phase 11 Engineering and/or locally funded construction projects. The Village has received a Statewide Planning & Research Program grant to supplement local funds to complete the Arterial Bike Network Study. Exhibit D lists the routes to be studied along with local destinations and connections. Exhibit E is a map of existing and planned bike routes including those to be examined as part of this study (purple routes). At a minimum, the following tasks are to be included in the scope of services. Additional tasks, at the consultant's recommendation, will be considered by the Village. 1. Complete site survey and data collection to establish existing conditions on all routes to be examined in the study. Boundary survey is not required but determining right-of-way lines by review of record drawings and site surveys will be necessary. Topographical survey will not be required for this project. 2. Communicate with surrounding municipalities, IDOT and Cook County to determine future plans for their own bike facilities 3. Communicate with key stakeholders to determine feasibility of constructing bike routes within their right-of-way or property including IDOT, Cook County, Union Pacific Railroad, Canadian National Railroad, ComEd and park districts. 4. Develop a webpage to be hosted on the Village website for public outreach. 5. Conduct a public survey to determine priorities of residents for locations and types of bike facilities in the Village. Include an online GIS application for resident input. 6. Hold a public meeting to hear feedback from the community on bike infrastructure priorities. 7. Develop an alternatives analysis report considering various on -street and off-street alignments for each of the routes. Consider reconfiguration changes such as road diets, road widening, and intersection improvements as appropriate to enhance bike safety and eliminate biking barriers. Determine the preferred design for each of the routes. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 4 8. Create a draft study that includes graphical and tabular exhibits that clearly communicate the recommendations to all stakeholders and the public. This should include cross-sections and aerial exhibits that detail existing and proposed infrastructure. 9. Develop a matrix that prioritizes projects based on various factors determined by the consultant. 10. Develop construction cost estimates for each of the routes. 11. Identify grant opportunities to construct the bike network. 12. Present the pre -final study to the Transportation Safety Commission. 13. Complete a final study based on feedback from Village staff, Transportation Safety Commission, and the public. 14. Present the final study to the Village Board of Trustees. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 5 Exhibit C Evaluation Process Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Arterial Bike Network Study Your letter and Statement of Qualifications should be emailed to the following address and received no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, June 30, 2023 to the attention of: Mr. Jason Leib Deputy Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect jleib(d)mountprospect.org The Statement of Qualifications will be evaluated based on the following factors: • Project Understanding & Technical Approach • Similar Project Experience • Project Team Capabilities • IDOT Prequalification Status • Overall Completeness of Submittal The Village will conduct interviews with the shortlist firms. Those selected for an interview will be contacted by the Village to arrange a date/time to meet at the Mount Prospect Public Works Department, 1700 W. Central Road, or via GoToMeeting. The Village of Mount Prospect appreciates your interest in this project. Any request for information or questions regarding this Request for Statement of Qualifications can be directed to Matthew Lawrie, Village Engineer, by phone at 847-870-5640 or email at mlawrie(cDmountprospect.org. Tentative Schedule Submit Statement of Qualifications r June 30, 2023 Select consultants for interview July 21, 2023 Select consultant and negotiate contract August 4, 2023 Award contract to consultant September 5, 2023 Kick-off meeting with Village September 13, 2023 Public Meeting & Comment Period December 2023 Alternatives Analysis Report Complete February 2024 Draft Study Complete April 2024 Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 6 Presentation to Transportation Safety Commission May 2024 Final Study Complete June 2024 Presentation to Village Board of Trustees July 2024 Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 7 Exhibit D List of Corridors, Destinations & Connections Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Arterial Bike Network Study Below is a list of items to be examined/considered as part of the study. It may not be all-inclusive and is subject to change with consultant's input at the Village's discretion. Bike facilities along arterial roads under IDOT jurisdiction: a. Rand Road (US 12) b. Northwest Highway (US 14) c. Des Plaines River Road (US 45) d. Golf Road (IL 58) e. Elmhurst Road (IL 83) f. Central Road g. Busse Road h. Kensington Road i. Oakton Street Bike facilities along arterial roads under Cook County jurisdiction: a. Camp McDonald Road (A58) b. Euclid Avenue (A59) c. Dempster Street (A64) d. Mount Prospect Road (W74) Bike facilities along arterial roads under Village jurisdiction: a. Wolf Road b. Central Road Bike facilities along railroad corridors (may overlap road corridors): a. Union Pacific Railroad (parallel to Northwest Highway) b. Canadian National Railroad (roughly parallel to Wolf Road) Bike facilities along utility corridors (may overlap road corridors): a. ComEd ROW (adjacent to CN Railroad) b. ComEd ROW on south side of town (Kopp Park) Major destinations within the Village to be taken into consideration: a. Downtown Mount Prospect b. Kensington Business Park c. Randhurst Village d. Melas Park e. Metra Stations Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department I Page 8 Connections outside Mount Prospect to be taken into consideration: a. Downtown Des Plaines Downtown Arlington Heights Des Plaines River Trail Prospect Heights Bike Path Busse Woods f. Elk Grove Village Employment Centers Northwest Municipal Conference bike corridors to be taken into consideration: a. Northwest Highway Bikeway b. Barrington -Wilmette Bikeway (Central Road) c. Evanston -Elgin Bikeway (Golf Road) d. Elk Grove -Evanston Bikeway (Com Ed ROW) EXHIBIT E Arterial Bike Network Study Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Legend Complete or In Construction In Design Programmed Future Mount Prospect Bike Plan Status (As of September 2023) Date Complete, or To Be Included in Arterial Project Name Phase Status Comments Targeted Completion Bike Network Study Phase I First phase completed in 2018, second phase completed in 2022. Signed Neighborhood Bike Routes I Complete 2022 Installed 28 total miles of on street signed bike routes. Striped Parking/Shared Lane Markings I Complete 2016 Lincoln and Meier, potential to add striped parking to Lonnquist Bike Lanes on Business Center Drive I Complete 2022 Included Feehanville Drive Metra Connections and Bike Parking I Complete 2018 Covered Bike Parking Installed Business Center Drive shared use path to Harvest Lane is in design for construction in 2024, crosswalk upgrade across Rand Road Rand Road/Business Center Drive/Isabella Street I In Design 2026 connecting to Isabella Street is in design as part of the Rand/83/Kensington intersection project targeting 2026 construction As part of the County's Busse Road Reconstruction, this Busse Road/Lonnquist Boulevard I In Design 2025 intersection will be improved with overhead Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons Golf Road/Robert Drive I Future N/A X Will require further study for feasibility Gold Road/NaWaTa Avenue/Linneman Road I Future N/A X Will require further study for feasibility The Village is looking to upgrade the crossing with overhead Central Road/Weller Lane I Complete 2016 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons to match the crosswalk being installed at Central Road and Cathy Lane Business Center Road Diet I Complete 2023 Completed with the 2023 Street Resurfacing Program Wheeling Road Road Diet I I lComplete 1 2023 Phase II Sharrows have been installed on Prospect Avenue, Emerson Street Striping Sharrows II Partial Completion 2023 and Wheeling Road. They have not been installed on Gregory Street, Burning Bush Lane and Council Trail Camp McDonald Road/Burning Bush Lane II Complete 2023 X County installed signage and pavement marking The Village has budgeted moneyfor a Phase I Study to complete NWMC- Northwest Highway II Programmed 2026 X the route within Village Limits NWMC-Central Road II Future N/A X NWMC - Golf Road II Future N/A X This route is complete within the Village except for intersection NWMC- Howard/Sibley Corridor -ComEd ROW II Future N/A X improvements The Village is currently designing the eastern end of this path, Kensington Road Shared Use Path II Future N/A X from the CN railroad crossing to Burning Bush Lane. River Road Shared Use Path II Future N/A X The county is including a shared use path as part of their Busse Busse Road Shared Use Path -Central to Golf II In Design 2025 Road Reconstruction Project Busse Road Shared Use Path - Golf to 190 II Future N/A X Wolf Road Shared Use Path II Programmed 2026 X The Village has budgeted money for a Phase I Study for Wolf Road South Mount Prospect Connection - Algonquin Road II In Design 2024 The Park District is redoing the ComEd Paths and the Village has requested they adjust the path alignment to better facilitate South Mount Prospect Connection - Busse Road 11 In Design 2024 Rand Road/Elmhurst/Kensington II In Design 2026 The Village is currently designing intersection improvements, including bike facilities through the intersection. Kensington Road/Pine Street 11 Future N/A X Northwest Highway Connection between Meadows Park Phase I design complete, Phase 11 design scheduled for 2024 II In Design 2026 and Melas Park (Melas-Meadows Bridge) The Village will be updating the bike plan to develop bicycle Bicycle Boulevards II Future 2025 boulevard or neighborhood greenway design standards. This may The incorporated into the updated traffic calming program Phase III Currently has sharrows, additional upgrades may be needed in the Seminole Lane III Future N/A X future after further study Camp McDonald Road III Future N/A X Euclid Avenue III Future N/A X Mount Prospect Road III Future N/A X Dempster Street III Future N/A X Oakton Street III Future N/A X ComEd ROW III Future N/A X CN Railroad Corridor III Future N/A X Currently being constructed as part of the Rand/Central/Mount Rand Road - Central to Isabella III In Construction 2024 Prospect intersection project Being designed as part of the Rand/83/Kensington intersection Rand Road -Isabella to Prospect Manor III In Design 2026 project Rand Road - Prospect Manor to Village Limits III Future N/A X Algonquin Road III In Design 2025 Phase I design complete, Phase II design scheduled for 2024 Elmhurst Road/Main Street I III IFuture I N/A X Legend Complete or In Construction In Design Programmed Future Bike Plan Map Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Future Routes and Intersection Improveme FUTURE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT FUTURE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Study RELATED EXPERIENCE T ..........................0 Civiltech Services Provided Agency Coordination Key Project Components T \'\ \\i\ Rand Road Sidepath (Des Plaines) US 41 & Lake Ave Intersection (Wilmette) Church Street Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements (Evanston) Old Plank Road Trail Extension Feasibility Study (Sauk Village) 167th Street Multi -Use Path (Orland Park) Middlefork Savanna Bridge and Trail Connection (Lake County Forest Preserve) IL Route 83 Bike Path (Bensenville) Beverly Road Bicycle Facility and Road Resurfacing (Hoffman Estates) Elmhurst Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project (Elmhurst) City of Chicago Arterial Resurfacing Program (CDOT) Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan (St. Charles) Des Plaines River Trail Central Feasibility Study (Active Transportation Alliance) Master Bike & Active Transportation Plan (Wilmette) Meacham and Golf Bike Path (Schaumburg) Arterial Bike Network _ Village of Mount Prospect Bike Plan Map Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Combined (Current and Future),,, MELAS TO MEADOWS BRIDGE IN DESIGN RRFB TO CROSS CENTRAL ROAD RRFB UPGRADE AS PART OF BUSSE RD RECONSTRUCTION. Routes and Intersections Nd / INTERSECTION // �� 6 /� / 'IMPROVEMENT ���/l� ' �/ � �/���� fi %/r ,✓ / /ice„��f ��%// %%��j/ ,. INTERSECTION J IMPROVEMENTS / / IN DESIGN / /� / 1 `/ s %Jj o. I RAND ROAD If% 49//DESIGNWALK IN Tit CENTRAL CATHY IPJj / / / CROSSWALK IN % l� %% / / ��h /l % CON�SgT�R CTION %`�AND MAIN 1� EMERSON ANO CROSSWALK IN /� CENTRAL ���� i !�/.; !/r1 DESIGN _ f% CROSSWApLK Lia Ti IMPROVEMENT !r� ////i//tel !%, o% /, `/f RAND, CENTRAL, MO U NT PROSPECT INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION //IIIM/: Bike Plan Map Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Current Routes and MELAS TO MEADOWS BRIDGE IN DESIGN RRFB TO CROSS CENTRAL ROAD RRFB UPGRADE AS PART OF BUSSE RD RECONSTRUCTION. Intersection Improveme Aov Ai / IN DESIGN ENTS RAND ROCROSSAD IN DESIGNWALK CROSSWALK I NIS, I/ CON STR EMERSONAND SSE AND MAIN 1// CENTRAL BU DESIGN CROSSWALK IN /� CROSSWApLK RAND, CENTRAL, MO U NT PROSPECT INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION K/NO/C( r / iii ,// Alifill RAND, CENTRAL, MO U NT PROSPECT INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION K/NO/C(