Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
7.1 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE-THROUGH LANES) AND A VARIATION (PARKING LOT SETBACK) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 915 EAST RAND ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS (PZ-01-23)
Mr�GauC �'d'+rt;�iect Subject 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE-THROUGH LANES) AND . VARIATION • • MOUNTPROPERTY LOCATED AT 915 EAST RAND ROAD,, PROSPECT, ILLINOIS(PZ-01-23) Meeting February 21, 2023 PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD Fiscal Impact false Dollar Amount Budget Source Category OLD BUSINESS Type Ordinance Information The Petitioner, LuAron Foster of Raising Canes Restaurants LLC, is requesting conditional use approval to construct a drive-through associated with a fast-food restaurant and a variation to decrease the parking lot setback, at 915 E. Rand Road, also known as the Subject Property. The Village Zoning Code designates the Subject Property as B-3 Community Shopping. The proposal requires Village Board approval for the conditional use and the requested variation. The proposal meets the requirements and standards related to the Village Code, and staff is supportive of the requests. The Petitioner proposes to demolish the existing commercial building and construct a dual -lane drive-through fast-food restaurant with related improvements. The various elements of the proposal are outlined below. Site Ian: The proposed site plan indicates that a 3,661 square foot building will be constructed on the Subject Property. The Subject Property is currently accessed from Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, Central Road and Albert Street. The proposed site layout proposes closing four of the six driveways. The existing western access to Rand Road would remain in its existing location and be converted to right-in/right-out only. The Albert Street driveway would turn into a 1 three-quarter access driveway (outbound right -turns onto Albert Street would be prohibited). The project proposes a dual -lane drive-through that has a counter -clockwise rotation around the proposed building. As currently designed, parking spaces would be provided along the west and south property lines and to the south of the proposed building. The parking lot setbacks along Albert Street, Central Road, Mount Prospect Road and along the west property lines will comply with the Village Code's minimum ten foot (10') parking lot; however, the parking lot setback along the Rand Road property line as shown would range from 6.7 feet to 9.3 feet. Variation approval is required to reduce the parking lot setback from 10' to 6.7' to 9.3 feet along the Rand Road frontage. The project also proposes two freestanding canopies associated with the drive- through lanes. A freestanding drive-through canopy is located above the menu boards facing Mount Prospect Road and measures 32 feet by 42 feet with a total height of 11'-6" and a clearance height of 10 feet. The second freestanding canopy is located over the pick-up window facing Rand Road and measures 19 feet by 21 feet with an overall height of 14'-2" and a clearance height of 12'-8". A third canopy is attached to the building and is located over the outdoor dining patio to the west of the restaurant. Hours of Operation: The proposed hours of operation are as follows: Sunday - Thursday 9:30 AM to 1:30 AM and Friday to Saturday from 9:30 AM to 3:30 AM. Other local suburban Raising Cane's restaurants operate from 10 AM to midnight daily. Staff proposes an additional condition of approval restricting the hours of operation of the proposed drive-through to midnight daily to reduce disturbances to the adjacent residences and to remain consistent with the other local Raising Cane's restaurants. Note, at the Village Board meeting on February 7, 2023, the Petitioner noted that the interior service portion of the restaurant's operation ends at midnight. Parking: The proposed 3,661 square foot restaurant requires thirty (30) parking spaces. The Petitioner's proposal will exceed the required parking spaces by providing a total of thirty-three (33) parking spaces. Additionally, based on data collected at other nearby Raising Cane's locations in Schaumburg and Glen Ellyn, the peak occupancies observed ranged from 18 to 28 spaces between the two sites. Traffic: The Petitioner submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS). The study concluded that the study intersections are projected to adequately accommodate the proposed redevelopment. Traffic exiting Albert Street must travel southbound 2 to Central Road via the three-quarter access driveway restricting right -turn movements and "No Right Turn" signage. Per the TIS, a review of the comparable local Raising Cane's facilities indicates that the proposed parking supply and drive- through stacking provided on-site will adequately accommodate proposed operations and spillback from parking or the drive-through is not expected on adjacent roadways. The Village Engineer has reviewed the TIS and the main concern was the amount of time it would take a vehicle to turn onto Central Road from Albert Street. At the stop -sign controlled intersection of Central Road/Albert Street, the TIS indicates that under existing conditions, it would take a vehicle 24 seconds to turn onto Central Road from southbound Albert Street. The Future (2028) Build Levels of Service shows that the 24 seconds would increase to 95 seconds after the project is built and fully operational. The Petitioner modified their original site plan to address staff's concerns by incorporating a three-quarter access driveway to prohibit cars from making a right -turn onto Albert Street from the site. The Village noted that Albert Street may be widened to accommodate three lanes- two southbound lanes (one shared through/left-turn lane and one dedicated right -turn lane) and one northbound lane - to reduce delay and improve the level of service at the intersection of Central Road and Albert Street. It is worth noting that the Central, Rand and Mount Prospect Road intersection improvements are scheduled to take place this summer concurrent with the planned site build -out. This means the timing of the lights in the improved intersection configuration can take into account the proposed drive-thru in operation. Additional discussion on traffic is included in the Village Board meeting summary below. Drive -Through cin and Service Vehicle Staging: Per the Drive -Through Stacking & Service Vehicle Staging memo and Drive -Through Queuing Plan submitted by the Petitioner, the stacking plan allows for 27 cars within the designated drive-through lanes. An additional 9 cars can be accommodated to stack during the initial "honeymoon"' period and would allow for a total of 36 cars in the drive-through stack before any cars would back up into the main drive along the west side of the site. During this "honeymoon" period, a crewmember and/or drive-through directional sign can be placed along the site's western drive aisle to direct inbound drive-through customers into the designated temporarily extended drive-through lane that would be defined by traffic cones. Landscaping: A significant amount of new landscaping is being provided site wide and as the entire site is currently almost all impervious surfaces, the modifications to the site are a substantial improvement over the existing conditions. The proposed landscape plan indicates a continuous row of permanent peripheral screening (Sea Green Juniper shrubs) around the perimeter of the parking lot and drive aisles and a screening knee wall at the intersection of Mount KI Prospect Road and Rand Road to mitigate any headlight glare coming from the cars within the parking lot and drive-through lanes. Staff has requested that the Petitioner enhance the landscape concept for the large grassy area along the Central Road frontage. This area is large and is located at a prominent intersection, and there is an opportunity for a landscape feature along Central Road. There are some minor revisions that need to be included in the current landscape plan; however, staff is confident that appropriate landscaping can be achieved on the site. Public Hearing: At the Planning & Zoning Commission hearing on January 26, 2023, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the project by a vote of 5-0. Six members of the public voiced their concerns concerning traffic, odor, noise, lighting, visibility of rooftop mechanical units, and the proposed hours of operation. The Commissioners raised concerns related to the amount of signage, hours of operation, trash service and early morning deliveries, the lack of native plantings, and striping the bike path across the Rand Road driveway. Staff stated that the Village would look into the bike path striping. The Planning and Zoning Commission modified staff's original recommendation to include an additional condition of approval requiring the Petitioner to add additional evergreen screening along the west side of the property (Albert Street frontage) between the parking lot and the residences to the west. Staff Recommendation: Staff is supportive of the Petitioner's request to construct a drive-through restaurant. The drive-through lanes would be located on the south, east and northeast areas of the Subject Property as to not have a detrimental impact on the residential properties to the southwest. The Petitioner states the site layout is designed to maximize drive-through stacking on-site which will minimize traffic congestion in the public streets and the double drive- through lanes will help minimize site congestion. The proposal includes the closure of four of the six existing driveways to minimize impacts to the roadway network. Further, the Petitioner has worked with staff to redesign the Albert Street driveway to discourage vehicles from driving through the residential neighborhoods to the north. The proposed use complies with the Comprehensive Plan and will be constructed to Village Codes. Staff is also supportive of the Petitioner's request for a variation since the Subject Property is unique and a hardship exists due to the physical constraints of an irregular-shaped lot. Per the Petitioner, the irregular shape of the Subject Property offers minimal opportunity for alternative site layouts and creates a unique situation for the Raising Cane's development, setting it apart from other properties that are also zoned B-3 (Community Shopping). The proposed project would replace a vacant commercial property with a new 4 restaurant along the Rand Road commercial corridor. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed project, as conditioned, will be desirable by replacing an underutilized site with a use found to be in high demand for Mount Prospect and the surrounding communities. Village Board Meeting: At the Village Board meeting held on February 7, 2023, the Village Board voted to continue the discussion of Zoning Case PZ -01-23 Raising Cane's, a conditional use request for a drive-through and a variation for reduced parking lot setback, to the second reading that will be held on February 21, 2023. The Board of Trustees raised a number of concerns related to traffic, the appropriateness of the use at the proposed location, the proposed hours of operation, costs related to widening Albert Street, and pedestrian/bicycle safety. Likewise, Mount Prospect residents also voiced their similar concerns. Below is a list of the salient points made by the Village Board and residents: Resident comments: • Problematic location - cars exiting onto Rand Road would block the right -turn lane onto Mount Prospect Road which is used daily by nearby residents. Cars making a left -turn onto Albert Street from east -bound Central Road to get into Raising Cane's and cars leaving Raising Cane's via Albert St - how will these impact the already congested intersection? (The petitioner and staff will address traffic flow issues at the meeting on Tuesday. The attached revised exhibits provide more detailed information on turning movements before/after the intersection improvements and proposed construction of the restaurant) • Was a traffic study conducted by the Village or did the Village rely on the traffic study prepared by Raising Cane's? (The Village Engineer reviewed and agree with the study's findings) • Other suitable locations were proposed by residents (Former Steak 'n Shake restaurant at Randhurst Village or the former Chase Bank building with drive- through at Mount Prospect Plaza). (While those locations could potentially work for the proposed use, the petitioner is under contract with the current property and that is what is under consideration by the Village) • When Mount Prospect Pointe was developed, the Village did not allow traffic to enter into the residential areas - what has changed? (Staff required that the Albert Street access point be restricted to prohibit right turn out movements to address this issue) • The Traffic Impact Study (TIS) studied the volume of traffic during 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM when the restaurant would not be open. What was the reason for this and can the traffic be studied during the morning hours when the 5 restaurant would be open? (The petitioner and staff will address traffic flow issues at the meeting on Tuesday. The attached revised exhibits provide more detailed information on turning movements before/after the intersection improvements and proposed construction of the restaurant) Village Board comments/questions: • The intersection is the second worst intersection in the Village. A better understanding of how traffic would flow through the intersection was requested. (The petitioner and staff will address traffic flow issues at the meeting on Tuesday. The attached revised exhibits provide more detailed information on turning movements before/after the intersection improvements and proposed construction of the restaurant) • The Village should not be responsible for paying for the Albert Street widening. (The petitioner has agreed to pay for the required widening of Albert Street) • A request was made for an exhibit showing the proposed Raising Cane's site plan overlaid on the larger overall exhibit showing all future intersection improvements. (This exhibit is Attached) • Is it the responsibility of the developer or the Village to stripe the shared path within the Rand Road driveway? (The petitioner is responsible for that striping) • Shared concerns regarding the left turn movement from Albert Street onto Central Road - Albert Street would back up onto property during peak hours. (The petitioner and staff will address traffic flow issues at the meeting on Tuesday. The attached revised exhibits provide more detailed information on turning movements before/after the intersection improvements and proposed construction of the restaurant) • The proposed site may not be the appropriate parcel for the development. There were concerns that the future intersection improvements could be undone because of the proposed project. (Staff notes that this parcel is zoned for a restaurant use, and it's the conditional use for the drive through component and associated canopies which require the zoning approvals. The petitioner also has worked with engineering throughout design to take into account the modifications being made to this intersection through the Rand/Central/Mount Prospect Road improvement project). • Concerns related to pedestrian and bicyclist safety were raised. • Several comments were made about the proposed hours of operation (Staff is recommending limiting hours to 10 AM to midnight). Next s: Village administration and staff reconvened with the Raising Cane's team on February 15, 2023 for a virtual GoToMeeting to discuss the Village Board's and residents' concerns. Village staff requested additional materials 6 including exhibits that would help explain and simplify the findings of the traffic study, an exhibit illustrating existing conditions within the overall context of the Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road/Central Road intersection, and an exhibit illustrating the proposed development within the overall network of the planned intersection improvements. The purpose of these exhibits would be to demonstrate that the proposed development would not undo the efforts to improve the existing intersections as the Village has invested $8.5 million into making these improvements. Attached to this memo are the following new and revised exhibits to be presented at the second reading on February 21, 2023: • Preliminary Civil Plans: These were updated to show a preliminary layout of the Albert Street widening. • Preliminary Landscape Plans: These were updated per the Albert Street widening noted above and includes increased landscaping along Albert and Central as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Village Board. • Color Landscape Rendering • Color Traffic Flow Exhibits: A detailed breakdown by page: • Page 1: Existing Conditions Traffic Flow • Page 2: Proposed IDOT/Village Improvements • Page 3: Proposed IDOT/Village Improvements with Raising Cane's & Albert Street Improvements • Page 4: Same as Page 3 but zoomed in on the Raising Cane's site Traffic counts for other fast -casual restaurants will also be discussed to show that impacts on the roadway network would be comparable between a Raising Cane's and a restaurant without a drive-through that is permitted by -right. It was noted by the Village engineer that the final timing plan for the traffic lights would not be evaluated and implemented until the intersection improvements have been completed. When the intersection improvements have been completed, IDOT would evaluate the existing conditions of the traffic at that time, and propose the new timing plan. Raising Cane's also indicated that they would be open to revisiting the issue of cost-sharing for the Albert Street widening. Staff and Raising Cane's representatives will provide a detailed overview of these matters at the February 21st Village Board meeting and answer any questions from the Village Board and audience. Alternatives 1. Approve a Conditional Use to allow for dual drive-through lanes, including the 7 construction of two freestanding canopies over the drive-through consisting of one drive-through canopy measuring ten feet in clearance height (10'-0") with a total area of one thousand three hundred forty-four square feet (1,344 SF) and one pick-up window canopy measuring twelve feet eight inches in clearance height (12'-8") with a total area of three hundred ninety-nine square feet (399 SF), one three-foot tall knee wall along the Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road frontage, and the installation of signage as illustrated in the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI, subject to the conditions of approval listed in the attached Ordinance; and 2. Approve a Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten feet (10') to six and seven tenths feet (6.7') and to nine and three tenths feet (9.3') along the east property line (Rand Road frontage) as shown on the site plan, attached as Exhibit "A", subject to the conditions of approval listed in the attached Ordinance. 3. Action at the discretion of the Village Board. Approval o 1. A Conditional Use to allow for dual drive-through lanes, including the construction of two freestanding canopies over the drive-through consisting of one drive-through canopy measuring ten feet in clearance height (10'-0") with a total area of one thousand three hundred forty-four square feet (1,344 SF) and one pick-up window canopy measuring twelve feet eight inches in clearance height (12'-8") with a total area of three hundred ninety-nine square feet (399 SF), one three-foot tall knee wall along the Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road frontage, and the installation of signage as illustrated in the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI, subject to the conditions of approval listed in the attached Ordinance; and 2. A Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten feet (10') to six and seven tenths feet (6.7') and to nine and three tenths feet (9.3') along the east property line (Rand Road frontage) as shown on the site plan, attached as Exhibit "A", subject to the conditions of approval listed in the attached Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: PZ -01-23 Memo to the Village Board.pdf PZ -01-23 Updated Plans for 2nd Reading.pdf PZ -01-23 Plans.pdf E-3 PZ-01-23 Staff Report.pdf PZ-01-23 Administrative Content.pdf PZ-01-23 Request to Waive 2nd Reading.pdf PZ-01-23 Minutes.pdf PZ-01-23 Review Letter 01.19.2023.pdf PZ-01-23 Traffic Impact Study II.pdf Final edits 02.21.23 2023 Ord. XXXX CU for a Drive-Through and a Variation (915 E Rand Rd) - Rev 3 - LM - CLEAN. pdf N Village of Mount Prospect lk Mount Prospect IV Community Development Department _M_ MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSECT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MICHAEL J. CASSADY, VILLAGE MANAGER NELLIE BECKNER, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER WILLIAM J. COONEY, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: ANN CHOI, DEVELOPMENT PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 2023 SUBJECT: RAISING CANE'S CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION REQUESTS Background At the Village Board meeting held on February 7, 2023, the Village Board voted to continue the discussion of Zoning Case PZ -01-23 Raising Cane's, a conditional use request for a drive-through and a variation for reduced parking lot setback, to the second reading that will be held on February 21, 2023. The Board of Trustees raised a number of concerns related to traffic, the appropriateness of the use at the proposed location, the proposed hours of operation, costs related to widening Albert Street, and pedestrian/bicycle safety. Likewise, Mount Prospect residents also voiced their concerns. Below is a list of the salient points made by the Village Board and residents: Resident comments: • Problematic location - cars exiting onto Rand Road would block the right -turn lane onto Mount Prospect Road which is used daily by nearby residents. Cars making a left -turn onto Albert Street from east -bound Central Road to get into Raising Cane's and cars leaving Raising Cane's via Albert St — how will these impact the already congested intersection? Was a traffic study conducted by the Village or did the Village rely on the traffic study prepared by Raising Cane's? • Other suitable locations were proposed by residents (Former Steak `n Shake restaurant at Randhurst Village or the former Chase Bank building with drive-through at Mount Prospect Plaza). • Albert Street will turn from a residential street into a collector street. • When Mount Prospect Pointe was developed, the Village did not allow traffic to enter into the residential areas — what has changed? • The Traffic Impact Study (TIS) studied the volume of traffic during 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM when the restaurant would not be open. What was the reason for this and can the traffic be studied during the morning hours when the restaurant would be open? Village Board comments/questions: The intersection is the second worst intersection in the Village and could potentially turn into the first worst intersection. A better understanding of how traffic would flow through the intersection was requested. The Village should not be responsible for paying for the Albert Street widening. A request was made for an exhibit showing the proposed Raising Cane's site plan overlaid on the larger overall exhibit showing all future intersection improvements. 10 • Is it the responsibility of the developer or the Village to stripe the shared path within the Rand Road driveway? • Shared concerns regarding the left turn movement from Albert Street onto Central Road - Albert Street would back up onto property during peak hours. • The proposed site may not be the appropriate parcel for the development. There were concerns that the future intersection improvements could be undone because of the proposed project. • Concerns related to pedestrian and bicyclist safety were raised. • Cost-sharing between the Village and the developer regarding the Albert Street widening should be proposed. • Several comments were made about the proposed hours of operation (midnight restriction). Next Steps: Village administration and staff reconvened with the Raising Cane's team on February 15, 2023 for a virtual GoToMeeting to discuss the Village Board's and residents' concerns. Village staff requested additional materials including exhibits that would help explain and simplify the findings of the traffic study, an exhibit illustrating existing conditions within the overall context of the Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road/Central Road intersection, and an exhibit illustrating the proposed development within the overall network of the planned intersection improvements. The purpose of these exhibits would be to demonstrate that the proposed development would not undo the efforts to improve the existing intersections as the Village has invested $8.5 million into making these improvements. Attached to this memo are the following new and revised exhibits to be presented at the second reading on February 21, 2023: Preliminary Civil Plans: These were updated to show a preliminary layout of the Albert Street widening. Preliminary Landscape Plans: These were updated per the Albert Street widening noted above and includes increased landscaping along Albert and Central as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Village Board. Color Landscape Rendering Color Traffic Flow Exhibits: A detailed breakdown by page: o Page 1: Existing Conditions Traffic Flow o Page 2: Proposed IDOT/Village Improvements o Page 3: Proposed IDOT/Village Improvements with Raising Cane's & Albert Street Improvements o Page 4: Same as Page 3 but zoomed in on the Raising Cane's site Traffic counts for other fast -casual restaurants will also be discussed to show that impacts on the roadway network would be comparable between a Raising Cane's and a restaurant without a drive-through that is permitted by -right. It was noted by the Village engineer that the final timing plan for the traffic lights would not be evaluated and implemented until the intersection improvements have been completed. When the intersection improvements have been completed, IDOT would evaluate the existing conditions of the traffic at that time, and propose the new timing plan. Raising Cane's also indicated that they would be open to revisiting the issue of cost-sharing for the Albert Street widening. Staff and Raising Cane's representatives will provide a detailed overview of these matters at the February 21s' Village Board meeting and answer any questions from the Village Board and audience. 11 PRELIMINARY CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR UTILITY AND GOVERNING AGENCY CONTACTS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT VILLATRATION GE OF MT. PROSPECT IL DEPARTMENT OF OF TRA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD 2 1 W. CENTER COURT 201 TE PROSPECT, IL 60056 TEL: (847) 670-5640 U 196 TEL:SCH(8 7) 07 IL 41 TEL: (847) 705-4541 CONTACT: CHUCK UNDELOF, P.E. CONTACT: ABBY ROBINSON, P.E. SANITARY AND STORM SEWER SERVICE EMAIL: ABIGAIL.ROBINSONflNSONG1WN01 S.GOV VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS POWER COMPANY DEPARTMENT COMED 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD CALIFORNIA AVE 00HIC TMT.EL PROSPECT, IL 60056 D 40 TEL: ACT. SEAN CONTACT: SEAN DORSEY C3 G CHICAGO, IL 60618 TEL: (600) 334-7661 34-7 6001 LOCAL SEWERS CICE W. PERSHI4 RD TEL. (, 8 4 S— TEL: CT-. AWAD R51 CONTACT: JAWAD RAHMAN WATER SERWCE VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056 TEL• CONTACT. SEAN DOR SEY NATURAL GAS COMPANY NICOR GAS 1665 BIRDHWOOD AVE DES PLAINES, IL 60018 TEL: (888) 642-6748 TELEPHONE AT&T CHI W RAIL OLPH6060 ST CHICAGO, IL 83-9 TEL: (630) 383-9249 CONTACT: KENNETH COLNELL EMAIL•KC1298®ATi.COM ENGINEER OWNERIDEVELOPER ARCHITECT Kimley»#Horn mASA �A)rsRa vFoe,� goo«, �szo-s„3 �o��sro� Cell Beloie CAUTION" You Di E t-800-891-0113 RAISING CANES MOUNT PROSPECT 915 E. RAND ROAD VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COOK COUNTY, IL 60056 BENCHMARKS REFERENCE BENCHMARK: SITE BENCHMARKS: SITE BENCHMARK /1 SIM BENCHMARK }2 Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C1.0 COVER SHEET C5.0 IPRELIMINARY SITE KEYNOTE PLAN C6.0 IPRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C7.0 IPRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION I, THOMAS J. SZAFRANSKI, A UCENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBMISSION, PERTAINING ONLY TO THE 'C' SERIES CIVIL SHEETS USTED ABOVE, WAS PREPARED ON BEHALF OF RAISING CANE'S, LLC BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. UNDER MY PERSONAL DIRECTION. THIS TECHNICAL SUBMISSION IS INTENDED TO BE USED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. DATED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY . A.D., 2023 IL LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 062-070698 MY LICENSE EXPIRES ON NOVEMBER 30, 2023. C 1.0 ----- la,a P_u.a E. RAND ROAD - r o lata • P �LG6IRUCTg1 \ c — — —mai_.-- a Y e lalaa [g t _,u xua.. m la e r o q OG _ aua i.a ro PAno uxro�PD, ODE—, °F RAISING C e,ssi ca157 IFI -15711 r� o . O ,may � �xY J Z da 0� � O. ��-•' } �. � _ ® N . "ormi� wa d ua /I _ _ Ammar c w a 4 I . os !gip ignu ' Ml I ' A m A A " �I -i° a o P x-, o' ALBERT STREET i i e� SITE ANALYSIS TABLE -1 IN EET t 20'@2aY3b T 1 -HENT „z. LEGEND a RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E. RAND ROAD O "e e7ewaea1urrea MOU NT PROSPECT, IT 60056 rve cuaAaeu..Fa PROTOTYPE 6E -V-A',' rvQ LUF88 a �, STORE;RC968 mP.Akrv���rv. D®E". o P TP,EMExTTrvT z oa I� S� Fory -r 3�U � ® EL 2 ,Ta .TArvo v ry 0 ® oa o� SITE NOTES eosn„ST.ww�s " DE 11LI. FOR REVIEW ONLY OTH J_ Kimley>»Horn i5Rr „Fry „m �E nvxo�n neo�T,: ,� xN Joa Na 168418037 rva.,� o try o�ko, BENCHMARKS IHEETIEIIIIINI SITE KEYNOTE PLAN an DATE 0111312023 Beide CAUTIONII You Di J08 NO. C5.0 SHEET NO. 0 0 O 0 D 0 0 D O 0 v m D 8 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 SITE ANALYSIS TABLE -1 IN EET t 20'@2aY3b T 1 -HENT „z. LEGEND a RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E. RAND ROAD O "e e7ewaea1urrea MOU NT PROSPECT, IT 60056 rve cuaAaeu..Fa PROTOTYPE 6E -V-A',' rvQ LUF88 a �, STORE;RC968 mP.Akrv���rv. D®E". o P TP,EMExTTrvT z oa I� S� Fory -r 3�U � ® EL 2 ,Ta .TArvo v ry 0 ® oa o� SITE NOTES eosn„ST.ww�s " DE 11LI. FOR REVIEW ONLY OTH J_ Kimley>»Horn i5Rr „Fry „m �E nvxo�n neo�T,: ,� xN Joa Na 168418037 rva.,� o try o�ko, BENCHMARKS IHEETIEIIIIINI SITE KEYNOTE PLAN an DATE 0111312023 Beide CAUTIONII You Di J08 NO. C5.0 SHEET NO. on non - �x M Mox WRNE NEEPM nxxn r M6 �, •o IYN YNEN E.—�E E. RAND ROADr 3� ti I 44_ IF �i Z� y GRADING NOTES GRADING LEGEND nve Issue D I • R �iz AE — — — — nnsmaAum ux Re. are E I 'Is --- --- E—T E o RAISING CANE'S \\ OG,y --- E,nm,DEMD,x.. RESTAURANT 1 as a� 915 E. RAND ROAD 0 ( ® \\ O � �n MOUNT PROSPECT, -A',' 6 1 '°0 PROTOTYPE 6E -V -AV �� ` f e Lam® t, \ SP,oFxroosm now Mxow .m s STORE;RC968 1 o F� �� now °xE i` Ro ISING SANE A n M'I Ts ire of aM (ownsivt vM) / i1 P 3,66 G O S`� 9 F V \\ IQ vT xultn EMaTxC ELLv0.TOx V �v FFE 9a tc wmmGuacE _ Z °`moi ovµ o 1 1 4 G > f \ s m+ .xWosEo— woDE o X V MmAnxE D—N ,n� 4. very 1 ; Ero�wx UTILITY LEGEND ww E ° uT,xlo a cax m 0 B ; y7pS 1 1sM— sExEn MAN. 1 1 IN THE PL- H11T EllElTll THEN THE I — nnDE a1Es ��® nM mew E x„ Nw. FOR REVIEW ONLY PD E ,� ----- —�oPo -ex xx�x.aTox A ALL °x Kimley>»Horn N. ALBERT STREET rnD.,Dm IN xxu Exaxmaxn? xN sod NO. 168418037 .. mED5' save DE ru EVEixn eaEROA e�Ha�AN. nen:.,N .,,>.F,FAr;. ca TSA i PAT. E.T arscvoEEOEPNZ i eTT ee..sco x,nee exT TF NlDIces.Tee Beide CAUTIONII \4vvv\/ voa o. -xxG-xxz-G,� PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN IATE 01/13/2023 OB NO. C6.0 ;MEET NO. N. ALBERT STREET. o+ Bio (sv. lylxe xerexius asx. ,z� e ( E.+1 ae..n pRIM. 6MI2 ie (NK 121 0. n eo (c ,a0 —Y xAEe� xY wn Eg` ew LL x� N: e>a � e.� a ak n . : . ux. WWW NH S x�� xN eea — _ an �ax�M e•) o IN soca IN, 1 e G u+r ux ' + zo o@ zaras ET IN (.'.I UTILITY LEGEND DATE ow=µx.vxxw>�ErvE xE „mss ��N11. 71 ,# f"` s3 o RAISING CANE'S em 1. M In xv — E<xrox.xT -. RESTAURANT ',\ Jx ��x�um xluaxc nµs xrer o+xws) r0.V w�MpNuoLE 915E.RANDROAD sxcri•eMO ) UNT PROSPECT, IT 60056 PROTOTYPE 6E-V-A','m OSA r N. ��� c. c sreL xEre°" STORE;RC968 I., e9 .- Ex. arcrereEoo ECEc,rec cNE g\INV _ V o n. 090 ro INV .1 sse�Mxee' oreePesEreoreexE�xENexox«,ree:NE z o` M IN _-OG q�/r xxcxnox srcrc. ,w. \\ � Mc a) ePaeas o saoa..ere" Neuc,urec ® W >a ®` ``� m(ec ery) —v O •— axoaosEo wArEx/LnE •preo ccEANo�T 11NnT eti ECTxcA I—Ire�TT/ EE IF UTILITY KEYNOTE LEGEND 0 exYMD 4 U. a M. e7 0 C®7 0 ae (NG e•) 0 e,e aµ� INY x acn 0 YIND ou eo c e� ss.ea Mw. e•) essiµ(c e9 IN. • INV •ee Mi c) °18 • ee M¢ c) INV seise ai r) INV . IN. e� ie (xc C) —Y xAEe� xY wn Eg` ew LL x� N: e>a � e.� a ak n . : . ux. WWW NH S x�� xN eea — _ an �ax�M e•) o IN soca IN, 1 e G u+r ux ' + zo o@ zaras ET IN (.'.I UTILITY LEGEND DATE ow=µx.vxxw>�ErvE xE „mss ��N11. 71 ,# f"` s3 o RAISING CANE'S em 1. M In xv — E<xrox.xT -. RESTAURANT ',\ Jx ��x�um xluaxc nµs xrer o+xws) r0.V w�MpNuoLE 915E.RANDROAD sxcri•eMO ) UNT PROSPECT, IT 60056 PROTOTYPE 6E-V-A','m OSA r N. ��� c. c sreL xEre°" STORE;RC968 I., e9 .- Ex. arcrereEoo ECEc,rec cNE g\INV _ V o n. 090 ro INV .1 sse�Mxee' oreePesEreoreexE�xENexox«,ree:NE z o` M IN _-OG q�/r xxcxnox srcrc. ,w. \\ � Mc a) ePaeas o saoa..ere" Neuc,urec ® W >a ®` ``� m(ec ery) —v O •— axoaosEo wArEx/LnE •preo ccEANo�T 11NnT eti ECTxcA I—Ire�TT/ EE IF UTILITY KEYNOTE LEGEND 0 0 0 C®7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I—— eexTM —N. x. x UTILITY NOTES Txwc om"ao.aacrov amuxawm 'mreTreTwx NG re��.+e.-cm��.w� ma "T NF 1N �TTT: oT:rereET � re� ATE FOR REVIEW ONLY -Ei�PO BENCHMARKSes°e°de mmr ro oux°° a slxcr uwuuwr me:: rerecgEF reE xcxeex ox.aT Tx �w� TM�Uexax.,. e� —1.1� Kimleft »>Horn ire„ T., ore �. FremT�.oreT oo .. re� xN Joe Na. 168418037 x uuvx . —55 K a°Lnx'm�m soe n xe'T s ncvxnw IN xcs,ver m.Efm swn e,.x rux xox+ T cwxw T E A�. �Nm ��.T�>rvc„Tre�t-.gTary UTILITY DETAIL PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN anDATE 0111312023 J08 NO. Beide You Di 3 C7.0 CAUTIONII 1-Boo-BB2-0123 SHEET NO. all ON 121 minas I MM Miami MEMO MEN INS PLANT LIST A A LT 1 2 1 --- ISO IS 17 6 11 E -g A! 21' 1 2- I! 12- G -,1 -- L -IIA �2 7 IL11 E- -11ISS 1E -TH"'- -2 IIAIT7�`T`I I" T, A_rS, � I`� 1 '111 -7�,SSTTTIII 11A-1.oH I -L IIET 11 ISH -- LANDSCAPE NOTES GENERAL LAWN NOTES I .... T .. .. IIII-A SITE ETILEITS A- -AHHI111E AA_L_ I, 11ISTINA III -L -1 &11 1IT1 A ..... T " 1 TION A. Il IIAUTI- --T-I III- -Iv IL TIEIA. 1.NSTL- 'IN'TA-R SHALL= LS1,1,N A�l I TIl-T 1. IINTIIITII 'HILL LI11T1 ILL 11 _ Nr"EA I H -T AI H_ELILSHNI �__ AN, N IT", HANIS A INSTALLATION.. ""'EST 11 1111 E.EL-E S'LLHIN . HITIHT LITIII. HSAL -ISHIS AS INNI-A SN S- I= 11�.IIT 11 IIA IA -1 -ILL 11 -HI A -1E A, 1IS11 ILL STIAISTINES. AT T11 111 11 ILIIEI 1111 .TH1. OEA1A IN SAINE _HAIT 11�IA X IE 'S""'ETI A'I�IS I ET. 11EISEIATE-11 STAN.. �-.IT11_11'1"ILA, ELI11 11-L -IIIES I -HE T 1. 1LOLH11 IT�ILLT LA I. A T, 'S =E N� H ' 1-11 11- IIIIIHED ALL 'L -IRST. rl '-TAL El --- T. rl-IIII, 1. AISS11TI'l�T1.1_1HILL A.A LALAN 111STALLITI 1. TII 11 MILLIS 1-11 THE RSaTESTPabaTa ,N H.TL 11-L A11EITANIE. T-1 SHALL �.'�'L`ILE'.LT 1. ILL H111111 1111 AaN 11E 11ILL IE "T 1 11 1E ..... HIT IE H11-1 TI 11111111G, IEEIIS� ELTES_ S, I I La. ILLL ", A E SE HLT"ATNS .1.1 HELTH, EIIILAS- lI A II -IN. 1111H .1 --A- NL -S- 7. -1-TS1 STILL ILIIILTEE -AIL-H-INT Il 6A0flB,hIj, NIL P111,, T%75024 ISS -1- SIS �. 1111H 1- 11-1 EENAEIE "T"HET"' ANIH E_pST ---T 1- L -L -PLI 11 L--- 1. ............. ... H -CL -1 .-TII-IS LI.11�1�1�TTHIEl " �'L' T 1"IEAAHESSE,�IE� 1IL"ALILAT'I'I_ 'll TI.IS111-111L AND SOLID SOD NOTES , A �E 1. IIITIAITII lHIII DI ID PLI SIAT - ILL "'SE, _ALft -TEIIAL 1-1111H LlL, . INIILHE ISSI3, .1 - -E TIHIHILS. TSI TI111- e1 1ANIH 1IT1 T.11- T. I'LL ALL-- 11- LA S11A 11 ANS LIISIT-ju 1. IILT 1-1 TI 11 EIE A 11111TH E Ell I'AS, ". LIST, _ NTl 'HAL jNHSHAT IN IEEE MAINTENANCE NOTES " 1. =_OSD T -S.- 11 ISD oPERATON I THE %.TE` `S ISEIT '1 -1 I.ALL Oz , I TLI - A `ALL` TNs eLE THE III LCE .1 ALL LAIIIISAIE. IEI p LAN SCAPE ASULATIONS 1. ILL L111111111 E III ITA HED H1 A IEAT "" IL-11 'I'ILLIE I EISNI 11ITHLIA IE 1-11113 L.T L-1111INS ST I'. ITHEI 11ISL AITIILH�E 1. A I I I_, I 1� -S III IISIN -111TELAIIIE. -11h -11 1� 11-1- 1., 29 ALL --Al A -S IHALL . UIT -1 .1 .I IT I.TS SIT PA IT %AT21= ... H 1 -1 -AL ALL IT SIT 1AT1111L 111-11A 11 A T� N L-1 HEILTIL , S_ I_=L E'III" UH`UTHED US " THESE ITS E.1-1-11HILFE. 11LE11 El 1114 ALL I" -TIAL H"H D- 'HALL 1111T I ALL 111111111EITI A111G 1EIT-L 111ITH ILANT AT -AL .1 I -AL I -SE. ILI L� K� I,- A11E1 11111L AIIEIT.11E. N CONCRETE PAVER NOTES IESI SIFTEI -HOE-11TE I SINT11-1 �HILL 111EIE THE .N"A_SEA S �UETIL 1'N1H TI" . E' 1.1�N111,TIT.E'l ... 11AL,ILE1E111 "A A , E I CS6`A`CLT0R �E TOTHO ATAIL"Ll"I.L.1-1 1.11 T12 ,=EAIN-' -1,1'EIIIIIATI111-1 T. RAISING CANE'S "'I :-,-- I, I., RESTAURANT 1.o 1-11 IIHALT 11 121 H- 1, 'I�E.L�LID.ELTEL I AI�IIE.1�'E�I 1 915 E. RAND ROAD N T IE I. N 'EI`n`E11',T!AL Bl.=E" I-INTA MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 6056 1 -1 - L�__ SHEET REVNINS . IINTIAITII '"ALL 111111T L TIIE T. THE A ID 1-111ENTIT1111 III IIIAL ISHII -1-IN P11.1 TS 'LA'HNS ,SI 11- --1 H- 1 �7 11 1 1. THE II IHALL 1E II -E 1� THE 121 HS- "I 1-, 2 I HIIIIEITITNI 11 SITE. 1. SIN -TE P11 AlAIL-E I . THE SHALL I-ITILIT A 1-11LE "'I'L ELT IN SIT, AT HO -INEE TI THE 111��11"11E'D, _,1�11111ATAT- TI II E I -111111 THI II -T TI S -ST AII -D ALL 1-1 EA111TED I'l THE IINFIIITII ISES NIT "S"T IS 'A"STATISTA ATIL TME 1. THE 1INTI11TI1 IIALL "III 11� "IDIFT111T,1111 'ED HEIIISENTATIVE AT.. 1AI-E TITLE .11NEL. 4345 North Contra] D;W SALE 1 - E. 4. 113� FIRMA BELLE oi a 11`§ 'FS Dal" T w mm o 1. ,gT14 865.1192 5 A LANDSCAPE PLAN DATE 122122 j6E No. 22189 L 1 .01 01 TREE PLANTING DETAIL .Ill—ILE Y, TREE PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND + nu aTrvk.m Ess FSE AND NOTES I ... .... I. .. ........ .. L—IL ILANI— III —LTITI—Il- 1-1— —T— T-1111. I'LL LT. T"I "'T L -T IN.T TI soar.lL I� IN -T-1. NIT- I.—I N.T IT -- 11LI. 03 CONCRETE L -T BALL R111-1 IUL— L. TAKE�,, " T .. .. I.LLTI— 1—TITI L A" "N .......... ..... T' —INI —Ill 1. 111T IL ILT TLIT IIIT ITTN 111"T" III IT LlI-lT III INI"ll 11-11IN1111111 11LIA T HT, N 111TI 111—T I V— 1-11 QT 'LI', . "I, II—L. -111 I—L 1� HT, III\ I HNIII "'T"' IN' 1,1EI II I 'I 1.11—LI 11.11IITeo . IVIN16L ILIll —TIILl ANIIII 1-11TIL—T— I—L. I� l� T11 IINTII Il T11 T,, I'TI, N � .11, NIT ILLI— I—. �l T11 A""' 1. I -T T111 �1-1 —TALLIT-1 ITIK- I.ILL I I �T—rvTS III I— ST—ILL, ITILL III —'Kl�, ll,�TII _TALLIT_ ILIN 1111NI. IAIL —L _ � __T AlIrv�T1u1'E'NT TI 11—ILL lIT rvo"IITrv'T LL—N. 02 SHRUB GROUNDCOVER DETAIL TI .1- 4245 North Cental D;W 0 � -2 B sufts 5-0- ELLE 2-8155.7M 77 FIRMA 000 RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS E 122122 NO 2 189 L1. 202 INE. RAND ROA"'DF PM IRRIGATION LEGEND. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODELNO, LA,1N$PFAV HEAD PONT-(II PSI) PROG-WITH P"LE BGiUBING $'LATIC NCI TRIP HEAD HUNT 30 51 GN HUNTER FLUR55 TUC N5 ZLE LAND HAND DSTRIP HUNT (3D PSI) ONHUNTER FLEROTUBIPLASTIC NOZZLE PART -11 FEAI CIRCLE HUNTER /aD P511 HSJ SIIP✓NNG JOINT MB"TITER ASSELY FULLlICIRCLE HUNTER (a0 P5) HSI IIPS✓VING JOINTASSEMBLY HUNTER PARTIlCIRCLE HUNTER (a0 PSD EST IG I SWING JOINT ASSEMBLY LINTER ® GOBBLER HEAD HDNTEF(II PSROZZLE ON HUN I SWING I BDBBLERHEAD HUNTER (30 PSI) LAICIUIILE NOZZLE HUNTER S I0I4LR-OLE CONTROL HUNTER PGV REFER TO PLANS FOR SEE GDNTF-TER HINTER IIPING REFER TO SPEC. 114' 1 1111111 POP (DI DRRIPVALVE DOL HUNTER PG7100 CONTROL ZONE KIT [ DRIP ER REFER TO SPEC. CLASS 210 NOTED PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE PIPING I-I TINI DEC IjLTS V— 11T 11 1.1.11TI III IIIERT t-----� DRIPUNE TUBING HUNTER DRIV NGS 11GA INDICATOR HEAD 11/11111 AND WATER METER REFER TO SPEC. PER LOCAL BOILDING CODE TT PPSIFEVENTEF N.4Ti5 765, REFER TO PLAN FOR SIZE M MASTER VALI E HUNTER PGO, REFER TO PLAN FOR SUE FLOWCHART 160 PIPE SIZE CHART Y R"lu zmsuppHt D,in 6800 Bi5M1a011111.1111, T%15024 TeL 91 ]6TI10C Ful 971T69,1101 FLOW/GPM: PIPE SIZE: 4245 NOft (:"t w E}RY surta5ffl wlrx�s 7s= zta.es5.7sz �. IRRIGATION PLAN 4.1 8.6 -14.5 14.6-27.0 1" 1-1/4" L2.01 27.1 -35.0 35.1-55.0 1-1/2" 2" FLOW CHART OTARV HEAOS: 11 FA 1s RAISING CANE'S ".FULL -CIRCLE a.D RESTAURANT 41'PAR11I11LE 4.0 aD' RULL-CIRCLE s.D 915 E. RAND ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 _ �' -'® �o SETH HEIDMAV ��A BELLE . �� FERMA _, 4245 NOft (:"t w E}RY surta5ffl wlrx�s 7s= zta.es5.7sz �. IRRIGATION PLAN DATE 12.21.22 JOB NO. 22189 L2.01 MAINLINE, uTEw,L AND GIRING NOTES: IPELEssurvANO FPEExES rvsaa rvx� 1. ALL 24 VOLT LEAD AND COMMON VALVE WIRING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF OF -14 GA. SINGLE CONDUCTOR. i REFER TO MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPER WIRE SIZE. WIRE SPLICES SHALL BE 3M-DBY RMA PER PE ORD INAT AND WATERPROOF RRIGAN NSYSTEMVAI"SPECIFICATIONS. CAPE rn w L 2. COORDINATE INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE EWITH WITHTNT OF SPE ENSURE ALL PLANT MATERIAL RILL BE WATERED IN.4CCDRD.4NCE \NITH THE INTENT OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. n 3. PIPING AND VALVES IN P4VINGSHDYYN FOR CLARITY INSTALL IN ADJACENT PLANTING BED ORLAWNAREA. � -i•'i$ `'"""o` xhp_ rnnorroa 4, L PIP ING SHALL HAVEA MINIMUM OF 12 OF COVER MAINLINE AND PIPING UNDER PAVING SHALL HAVE AAMINIMUM OF 18" OF COVER. ALL FITTINGS TO BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. USE WELD -ON #705 SOLVENT AND WALLMOLUT CONTROLLER WALLMOUNT SENSOR ER SOURCE LAYOUT 0P£6 PRIMER FOR PVC CONNECTIONS PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. 5. SIZE ALL LATERAL PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS OF NOT EXCEEDING 5 FPS. REFERENCE PIPE SIZE CHART. 6. CONNECT LAWN SPRAY SPRAY, TREE BUBBLER. AND DRIP INDICATOR HEADS TO LATERAL PIPING WITH HUNTER l S SJ SWING JDINT. CONNECT ROTARY HEADS TO LATERAL PIPE WITH HUNTER HSJ SWING JOINT. 7. PERFORM ELECTRICAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL BUILDING CODE. POWER LCXV) SHALL BE LOCATED IN,A JUNCTION BOXAND HARDWIRED WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF CONTROLLER LOCATION BY GEN ERAL G,11 ani GUT I09Ls CONTRACTOR. 6800 SI,, 14lno, Iatl. PTX75024 -,,,, n+oE Tele'. 97 ]6`JJI00 U, 97 69101 "ur.m ixe8. INSTALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES AND WIRE SPLICES IN TEN (10") INCH ROUND HIGHLINE VALVE BOXES. xa P P sUE 9. INSTALL SLE EVES ON D ER ALL HARDSCAPE SO BRANDS SUCH AS ROADS. DRIVES. WALKS, ETC. WHETH ER SHOWN ORNOT. SLEEVES SHALL BECLASS 200 PVC, SIZEDAS NOTEDON PLANSAND INSTALLED BY 9� IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. "' � .1 .ra v. r, 111111 IIHII I III III—I A r12 -nK."ar a2 III_111-111-11F,II IIIII � SII � ao, w4 2 10. ADJUST NOZZLES FOR SITUATIONS THAT REQUIRE LESS THAN 90 DEGREE RADIUS SPRAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOTE CONTROL 1AFVB REMOTE CONTROL DRIP YON E KIT TREE BUBBLER PVC E SIZE CHART ADJUSTABLE NOZZLES. NO OVERSPRAV' ALLOWED ON ANY HARDSCAPE SURFACES. - ox 11. DES ICN PRESS UREIS57.0 URP51.STATICPRESSUREI56SPSI. TEN DAYS PRIOR DONT SSTARTOFCONSTRUCTION, vLL TO PR CEED. PRESSURE. IF STATIC PRESSURE IS LESS THAN STATED DO NOT START WORK UNTIL NOTIFIED - °u 12. IA IN INCH DISTANCE BETWEEN MAIN LINE AND LATERAL LI NE FITTINGS (EXCEPT FOR REDUCER BUSH INGS) TO x .nn om-run ,.rr_ rr re.nVr," E EIGHTEEN (18 11NCHE5 AND MINIMUM HORIZONTAL OISTANCE OF TWENTY-FOUR (24 ) INCHES BETWEEN xnnrn+n. ANY VAL\/ES THAT ARE INSTALLED SIDE BY SIDE. _ 13. INSTALL REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE KITS IN TWELVE BY SEVENTEEN(1-17)INCH HIGHLINEVALVEBOXES. 1111-111D HO 11 THAI IRUIBNTA 11 a_re z om 14. INSTALL DRIPLINE MINIMUM OF 2"AND A MAXIMUM OF 4" FROM HARDSCAPE SURFACES. STAKE DRIPLINE AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM DYVNERC REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE INSTALLATION. DO NOT EXCEED MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONSOF 5'-0" PS IN DRIPLINE. _ mEoocu' iry 15. PROVIDE AND INSTALL DISTRIBUTION TUBING. STAKES, EMITTERS, TRANSFER FITTINGS, DIFFUSER BUG CAP11 ET, CONTROL ZON E KITS ETC. NECESSARY FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE BEDS. ALL PVC HEADER PIPING aussLvaaO atiFccaox LAWN SPRAY HEAD DRIP INDICATOR HEAD TO BE CLASS 200 PVC SOLVENT WELD PIPE. INSERT ALL HUNTER BLD BARBED FITTINGS PER n.anrv�' MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. INSTALL ONE DRIP INDICATOR HEAD FOR EACH DRIP ZONE. INDICATOR HEAD TO BE A HUNTER ECO INDICATOR HEAD. 16. AIRNACUUM RELIEF VALVE TO BE HUNTER PLD -ARV INSTALLED IN ASIX -INCH DX HIGHLINE VALVE BOX WITH E. » aorE OF GRAVEL SUMP AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE TO BE HUNTER AFV INSTALLED IN ASIX -INCH (6") HIGHLINE'i VALVEBCXWFHGOFGRAVELSUMP. .. w..,, r..... V 17. ALLHUNTERPLD-CV DRIP LINE AND DISTRIBUTION TUBING TOBEINSTALLED BELOW FINISH e� APPROXIMATELY4 TOB PER MAN DISTRIB TIO RECOMMENDATIONS ALL BELO FINISH INSTALLED re 6AN-. MINIMUM OF 1 -0 AND MAXIMUM OF 1 8 ROW SPACING UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE VERIFYTHE EXACT EM FTER FLOW EMITTER SPACING. AND ROW SPACING WITH MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLING TO PROVIDEPROPERPRECIPITATIONRATEBASEDON PLANT MATERIAL AND SOIL TYPE TUSINGTOSESTAKED WH H 12 GA. GALVANIZED TIE DOWNS. INSTALL STAKES EVERY 3-0' ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH OF TUBING ANDA MINIMUMOF24" FROMANYFITTINGS. RAISING CANE'S •".`•° .x'"." 13. INCLUDE THE ACT O°.wGALLOWANCES FOR PROVIDING AND INSTALLING AIR BELIEF VALVESAND FLUSH RESTAURANT AIR RELIEF VALVE IN70MAZIC FLUSH FALVE TYPICAL SHISTIFACE DRIPLINE LAYOUT VEEFOR THE DRIP SYSTEM. EXACT QUANTITY. AND LOCATION OF THESE DEVICES WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. IN GENERAL ALL AIR RELIEF VALVES WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE HIGH POINTS AND FLUSH VALVES WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE LOW POINTS OF EXHAUST HEADER. ALLOW FOR 915 E. RANO ROAD KIPROXIrvIATELY ONE (I) AIR RELIEF VALVE AND APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) FLUSH VALVE FOR EACH DRIP ZONE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 aai 19.E POSSIBLE LOCATE ALL MAINLINES, VALVES, DR CONTROL NARES SHALL BE LOCATED AND INSTALLED REVISIONS x rLyunn n�V=xno.".r - emoa. d. ny,s ow°moia.0ax OUTSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 20.OVIDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIAL NECESSARY TO HAND DIG WITHIN ALL EXISTING TREE ROOT ZONES. - - CONTRACTOR MUST STAKE DITCHES AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY ...r TRENCHING OR DIGGING. onm "c+Ton _ 21. ALL STATE OF OHIO LAD—CLES AND ALL LOCAL CODES/ORDINANCES ARE MADE PART OF THESE PLANS AND 11 SPECIFICATIONS WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT. THESE LAWS AND ORDINANCES WILL SUPERCEDE THE PLANS, rnn rtir n �xQ. 5 DETAILS. ANDIORSPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT THEY ARE TO T INCLUDEANY AND ALL COST NECESSARY TO MEET OR EXCEED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN OR LOCAL KENOEHA CODES CONCERNING LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION TYPICAL DRIPLINE LAYOUT TYPICAL DRIPLNE LAYOUT TYPICAL DRIPLINE LAYOUT 22, PROVIDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIAL NECESSARY TO THE IRRIGATION PER LOCAL CODES. 11 " " IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS DATE. 12.21.22 JOB N0. 221 S9 SETH HEIDMAV O BELLE 4245 Nl(:.FUW E}RY �aetn `_ FIRMAI:' LANDSCAPE PLAN FEBRUARY 17, 2023 if YOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS BELLE FIRMA PRELIMINARY CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR UTILITY AND GOVERNING AGENCY CONTACTS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT VILLATRATION GE OF MT. PROSPECT IL DEPARTMENT OF OF TRA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD 2 1 W. CENTER COURT 201 TE PROSPECT, IL 60056 TEL: (847) 670-5640 U 196 TEL:SCH(8 7) 07 IL 41 TEL: (847) 705-4541 CONTACT: CHUCK UNDELOF, P.E. CONTACT: ABBY ROBINSON, P.E. SANITARY AND STORM SEWER SERVICE EMAIL: ABIGAIL.ROBINSONflNSONG1WN01 S.GOV VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS POWER COMPANY DEPARTMENT COMED 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD CALIFORNIA AVE 00HIC TMT.EL PROSPECT, IL 60056 D 40 TEL: ACT. SEAN CONTACT: SEAN DORSEY C3 G CHICAGO, IL 60618 TEL: (600) 334-7661 34-7 6001 LOCAL SEWERS CICE W. PERSHI4 RD TEL. (, 8 4 S— TEL: CT-. AWAD R51 CONTACT: JAWAD RAHMAN WATER SERWCE VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056 TEL• CONTACT. SEAN DOR SEY NATURAL GAS COMPANY NICOR GAS 1665 BIRDHWOOD AVE DES PLAINES, IL 60018 TEL: (888) 642-6748 TELEPHONE AT&T CHI W RAIL OLPH6060 ST CHICAGO, IL 83-9 TEL: (630) 383-9249 CONTACT: KENNETH COLNELL EMAIL•KC1298®ATi.COM ENGINEER OWNERIDEVELOPER ARCHITECT Kimley»#Horn mASA �A)rsRa vFoe,� goo«, �szo-s„3 �o��sro� Cell Beloie CAUTION" You Di E t-800-891-0113 RAISING CANES MOUNT PROSPECT 915 E. RAND ROAD VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COOK COUNTY, IL 60056 BENCHMARKS REFERENCE BENCHMARK: SITE BENCHMARKS: SITE BENCHMARK /1 SIM BENCHMARK }2 Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C1.0 COVER SHEET C5.0 IPRELIMINARY SITE KEYNOTE PLAN C6.0 IPRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C7.0 IPRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION I, THOMAS J. SZAFRANSKI, A UCENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBMISSION, PERTAINING ONLY TO THE 'C' SERIES CIVIL SHEETS USTED ABOVE, WAS PREPARED ON BEHALF OF RAISING CANE'S, LLC BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. UNDER MY PERSONAL DIRECTION. THIS TECHNICAL SUBMISSION IS INTENDED TO BE USED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. DATED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY . A.D., 2023 IL LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 062-070698 MY LICENSE EXPIRES ON NOVEMBER 30, 2023. C 1.0 t Cil E. RAND ROAD rC ;s FOR REVIEW ONLY KimleyoHorn -r.�xsE ♦s _..�. �a v. e.sE+an:s.a -.n.ue KH JQB NQ. 168A18037 BENCHMARKS SITE KEYNOTE P PLAN caa /V V! DATE 01 /1312023 CAUTION!! ;JOB NO U. C5.0 i-800-892-0123 I +�\ V ,vi v vV� iSHEET NO. ' \1� e _ LEGEND �„ PE��9Ec,1e .- RAISING CANE'S aa�ra ry ti RESTAURANT 915 E. RAND ROAD P � a�,c icc„cre NIOUNT PROSPECT, IT 60056 PROTOTYPE 6E -V -AV STORE kRC968 rDG ff 2 Q 3 SITE NOTES ;s FOR REVIEW ONLY KimleyoHorn -r.�xsE ♦s _..�. �a v. e.sE+an:s.a -.n.ue KH JQB NQ. 168A18037 BENCHMARKS SITE KEYNOTE P PLAN caa /V V! DATE 01 /1312023 CAUTION!! ;JOB NO U. C5.0 i-800-892-0123 I +�\ V ,vi v vV� iSHEET NO. on nDn �Nw~ m E� M MED B NG nx°nM T.__ �, e INN YNEN E.—�E E. RAND ROADr 3� ti I 44_ IF �i Z� y GRADING NOTES GRADING LEGEND nve Issue D I • R �iz tiE — — — — nnsmnAusEADr uN Re. are E I 'Is --- ---E—T NNE o RAISING CANE'S OG,y --- E,nm,DEM�r RESTAURANT 1 as a� 915 E. RAND ROAD 0 ( ® \\ O � �n MOUNT PROSPECT, -A',' 6 Y '°0 PROTOTYPE 6E -V-A',' �� ` f e Lam® t, \ SP,oFxroosm now Mxow .m s STORE;RC968 ' r o F� �� n� °NE i`No ISING SANE A n M'I 's rre of aM (ownsivt vM) / i1 P 3,66 G O S`� 9 F V \\ IQ vT xurtn EMaTxC ELLv0.TOx V �v FFE 9Q tc wmm GuacE _ °v`�i ovµRI o _ vAN r A N — — — .��osEo Aon — m� + h°, s U �ED�E DD �noAn w wwnw� oma ww \\ m 'n�Nm 1 Ero�wN UTILITY LEGEND ° uT,Nlo a cax m i B ; y7pS 1 1 �JPh % ��,_ a six rMr sExEn MAxxac = LL 1 1 M.— Q IN THE PL- H11T EllElTll THEN THE �... ItJ 1 e �,• ______________r.n. �Mwr I — nnDE alts ��® nM www E FOR REVIEW ONLY x„ Nwr PD E - ,� ----- — SOW -eN NN�N.aT1N Kimley>»Horn N. ALBERT STREETN II nw NaNmx YMD D ro = GV a�.Dm IN NND KNBoa Na 168418037 meos.�n save eoe ru i :wa .,=.o EzrErn eaERon e�Ha�>N. i Pea. E.T arscvos ISEPNZ i eTo ee..sco x,nee exT or t� ces.oee Beide CAUTIONII \4vvv\/ You Di -NNG-NNz-G,� PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN LATE 12/21/2022 OB NO. C6.0 ;MEET NO. —Y rog� Ee.xx,ER� a xY wT: exx eD ak n DW xe WY NH >Y xx: e�e.9T - xY an � �=w e•1 0 y civ Mµ e7 e n,F x EEET — ��� ✓ � u+r ux , zoco� zax3s Nvou, e(r�M' es e,—ENxxEDAT xx UTILITY LEGEND " EE O ,'� M. 2rox.x. o RAISING CANE'S ` G2 xo �D.I M ey MeN"D RESTAURANT -N. vuNs xrer oTxws) r0.V WDLpNl LE 915 E. RAND ROAD sxsri•e MOUNT PROSPECT, IT 60056 r ux "" a"^" s"c PROTOTYPE 6E-V-A',' �, • m OSA nacs xE STORE;RC968 FC n (x \ I (sa e'1 '- ex. arc""eoo csec,cc sNe _Vo eeeD�exDD�,�oDxDxex H exT111e�tie am sxrcn z xW a aux N TEL 11-11Dfro 1 s E xxTv+S1EEVF. Tm' R u a� �' vxavas'eo overy �o sTaxm s,reue,urev = - r 3LL' ® U eee ry Trx..� tiE — W �� �\ xD Wxxam O x— PAaPa Eo WA RT E.,A� TAND"T= 0 ry m (sc e•1 I <�; (AElEl To ".Da I"" T Ill MDI) D" / EL«,x A of g ., , s ceE x•I e.mE _ ALLTi ,R ° a° _T, as`R o"x Q o e xD.,.DDx I � e• � e — --- =`' N. ALBERT STREET - - - m . TI (s¢ . xATEx D: +. NE. 11) pie ee3, (s e�l UTILITY KEYNOTE LEGEND 0 0 a M. e7 0 TMD N D,D7 1 >s a. e� ae ac e•1x C®7 Il UNDERAODDETEN 0 D,sND DETENIe•Ix ae(Ne) 0 D,e,aµ� 0 x acn 0 TMD E—N Du eo c e-) IW 01. ss.ea Mw. e•I E. essiµr¢. e9 D,D EEIM vmLT r66 Mi c1 me ee Act seise ai a•1 eIN.e') ie (xc C1 UTILITY KEYNOTE LEGEND 0 0 0 C®7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x aD DxxDexx aD�xDx.Ex UTILITY NOTES xmaurr ' n FOR REVIEW ONLY POIT -MT WR �P� aENCHMARS'd, P. o D x�xxx� �e:: KS P"E xEEx xFox.AT 0x A LL =ew�aWTM�Uxxa�r,.�er Kimle»>Horn 168418037 x uux. I. K a°Lne'm�m soe n —IT s EL_ +a�so.w s . IN xeemer Tx I I— eT.x rux xoxTxusT -1 UTILRY DETAIL PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN allDATE 1 212 112 0 2 2 Beide CAUTION' , You Di J08 NO. C7.0 1-Boo-BB2-0123 SHEET NO. I Gr2GKin 27 CARS (PHASE 1 - STANDARD PEAK) 9 CARS (PHASE 2 -GRAND OPENING PEAK) ESTIMATED TOTAL = 36 CARS VILLAGE STACKING REQUIREMENT = 10 CARS NOTE'. ALL DRIVE-THRU STACKING BASED ON 22' SPACING. VILLAGE STACKING REQUIREMENTS ARE BASED ON 20' SPACING, BUT 22' SPACING WAS USED HERE PER RAISING CANE'S OPERATIONAL STANDARDS. TITLE: PROJECT: LOCATION: sae NunnaeR. 168418037 Kim ey))) HornDRIVE-THRU 915 E. RAND ROAD SCALE 1"=20' RAISING CANES C0968 E -E 10/26/22 4201 WINFIELD ROAD, STE 600-WARRENVILLE, IL60555PHONE:(630) QUEUING PLAN MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 SHEET. PHONE: (630)487-55561 mnvw.kimley-horn.com 1 OF 1 r Y� January 3, 2023 Ms. Ann Choi, Development Planner Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE. Drive Thru Stacking & Service Vehicle Staging Raising Cane's r6 915 E Rand Road UZZENEVIUMA Dear Ms. Choi, This letter is being provided to you in response to your request for additional information about how Raising Cane's will manager customer and service vehicle circulation onsite. Drive Thru Stackin : Managing our drive thru stack is a top priority at Raising Cane's. It is our goal to manage the stack efficiently daily, especially during our peak periods of lunch and dinner. During peak periods, we deploy Crewmembers with tablets in the drive thru to take orders, payment, and deliver food. Cones and pavement striping can be used to direct the cars and delineate the area where our Crewinembers are located. We operate our multiple lanes within the drive thru when cars begin to stack beyond the order boards. Once the peak traffic is over, we remove the cones. If warranted, Raising Cane's deploys off-duty police officers to control traffic at point of ingress and egress. The drive thru stacking plan for Mount Prospect allows for 27 cars within the designated drive thru lanes. In case of a larger number of cars during our "honeymoon" period, we have a plan for additional cars to stack within our property. The additional 9 cars would allow for a total of 36 cars in the drive thru stack before any cars would back up into the main drive along the west side of the site. Refer to the attached Drive-Thru Queuing Plan for a depiction of the proposed "honeymoon" period stacking. As shown in this plan, a Crewmember and/or a drive thru directional sign can be placed along the site's western drive aisle to direct inbound drive thru customers into the designated temporarily extended drive thru lane. This lane will be defined with traffic cones. Any cars trying to cut the line by traveling southeasterly along the northern parking lot drive aisle will be blocked from entering the drive-thru by the line of traffic cones which will direct them back to the main western drive. 6800 Bishop Rd, Plano, Texas 70524 t) 972.769.3100 f) 972.769.3101 1 www.raisingcanes.com 30 Our standard at Raising Cane's is to allot 22' for each stacking space. This is more conservative than the minimum requirement for Mount Prospect which is 20' stacking spaces. Therefore, values shown in this analysis are conservative compared to the Village's minimum requirement. Service Vwe is e Ma ° in nt.: It is always Raising Cane's goal to have all food deliveries and trash pickup services completed during non -business hours. The only time these vehicles would be onsite during business hours is if they are delayed for reasons outside of Raising Cane's control. The food delivery vehicles will enter and exit the site via the Albert Street or Rand Road driveways. Due to the site's size constraints, the vehicles will be limited to the western drive only, so vehicles will stage in the western drive while the drivers unload their goods. These vehicles will then leave from the opposite driveway from where they entered since trucks will not have the ability to make a U-turn. Similarly, trash pickup trucks will enter the site from one of the two driveways and then navigate southeasterly to access the trash enclosure located near the drive thru entry. These trucks will then leave through either of the two driveways. We are excited to be part of the Mount Prospect community. Please reach out with any questions. Sincerely,, 6_1 LuAron Foster Raising Cane's Senior Property Development Manager 6800 Bishop Rd. , Plano, Texas 75024 t) 972.769.3100 f) 972.769.3101 1 www.raisingcanes.com 31 xAExroE-.31111111 ni IF]�PAra , I -77 :,kFI� IIEHI 2- KEYNOTES AREALEGEND III KUI".IEIT. ED H, seas 2 IIELBllllBlllNlllEI TI111E ",,., Il I-E 11E INI EllIL 1IINDINI 11N� A 'T 2 E A CODE AND BUILDING DATA APPLICABLE CODES �IINIIINTs IEDTI ILLIN-TITE ILIONII IIII -LL� IL TI IIIE IllllTINlLE=1,1,1,1,,l0 lEl, ID 'TE'N'TI, 1.11 ILLIN.12 IN-111 D-11-10 -111OLILL INE IDIE A -LIZ - -]-I— Ll Ll IEl I 11111E 'T ..... L ------ IDFITI sus Ess NEW CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION TYPE) 'DID 1111-ED IIIED IIE I I I ITI-El ACCESSIBLE TABLES ACCESSIBLE TABLES ADA INCE r2 L, ADA CLEARANCE T. 11-I-L-E UI 1.-UINI ILE-HI InI -11 RAISING CANE'S SCALE 314"=l'-O" AIIEl-ll -1AIE �IT JT� DNI�L RESTAURANT IIIE-11THI 915 E RAND ROAD MT. PROSPECT IL 60056 PROTOT (PE P6E-VAV SCHEME NSRESTAURANT GENERIL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS ILL1111 HT A_L, �� 1'� IUDIEIT IIINI - - - - -------o-------------------- - - - —1 ll:�, 4 R0968 VERSION 2022-1.0 RELEASE 8.10.2022 011111110 oe A II�M.LDHDKIIIA2�,-,.Er. OINI I_', I T� --H-XHT I ITII T-E A�LLEA I�L-R.ELAE 11— E A 0 o I F— —1 14, "T Zl' I OWUPANITLon T XIIIANT LU 'R I-ANLE uI Is --I� IF I lwll— I j u AI 1 ININDT-1 'T �T'�Tl'l`lffl'E' � 1NET - - - - - - - IININD Ed- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - "1 11 21 B" "' "1 6 IIIIIIE111L ITIITN �-I- - ITI-E 12' CL /7 D 6- TITIL -1-TS klEANSDFOGRESS TH�-11�T",E��Tll�11111111�11111 T' '- r I IL L L J =IIEI�I I... -NINTA 'I EDE DES'l"I'll TH TI-L IEI 1-1-T I 1-THAIIIII III A-TITIII ss -1- 11DIHllH!1,1%lH I 11, ENT11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TIlL IDIEII IIDTI 1.11HED 11, 1. 11-AT DI 11111L L ICE 111 111111 All A * " 17TT-L IHIL D.T EIIEll luITDIEIII FRY " EII � 'EDU Dlll� ID-HIPIIIIIED - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r r - - - - - - - - - - -------- .1111ELDIIII-I EEIIII-1111 Tl�LEHll.l=ETll�Tll L=IIE J FEL 0-D PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS lAIIJTDlI 7� 0] 1X ry I IT —I-ETILEIALE� I PEI'D 111 1 2 jj� AJ-EI El I �� I" I IIIIINIDDINT111 I IEI III III DLHEI IERYIEINI 1 7 ti [4 I! AiI P`=-�! El FIRE EXTINGUISHER REQUIREMENTS H I�HlIEIT CODE REFERENCE mau =�]ll mW-1 IlHR :pl� =T D"11%El rDa ANALYSIS PERMITDA E XX/XX/XX my W[-U L.N crsncry JOB NO. 22189 CEa ' L INE0 TITLE a[rts,000 I, T HEI 11�11,11.T-EL�l�Tl�lE�l�SLINEAIIE� HT 01 CRA eiou rwlva.i ET,us J11 'TI s..nae �1 GATE TO POST CONNECTION A020 snLE lw=ii �oEIT sow I LTHa�L TuIlITIELIIIT IIINDIT IN III nazaTwaL IL II eoLsas, aE. vao.so 2, DUMPSTER GATE THRESHOLD DETAIL A0.20 scn�e.11z=1'a° cooaoi asTE.nnnoEnEr ELE11111L 1-1 1—D DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ELEVATION A0.20 scALE. tz =1 a -.�. FEu�w�•Y 11 =E 1111T —1 111sEESTIITT— o�tiTti"IT I T, AE�,L o l T� Pao 111 11 IITI F1 , DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SECTION A0.20 srn�.1,e=1a DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN 0.20 SCALE. 112"=1-0' J IlNIIl s" 'TR"T Fos I,, sT ---- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ELEVATION Aa2a SCnLe 112'=1'a" �T�RERAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E RANO ROAD MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056 PROTOT ILE'P6E-VAV SCHEME: AIE RESTAURANT RRC968 /ERSION2022-1.0 RELEASE 8.10.2922 �4 �LL3 DUMPSTER DETAILS DATE. XVXX/XX 22189 A0.20 "IT—NINT IE 1.11 4 crvnTE urvrvzs s 4 c 1 r c 4 11 ILEAI DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN 0.20 SCALE. 112"=1-0' J IlNIIl s" 'TR"T Fos I,, sT ---- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ELEVATION Aa2a SCnLe 112'=1'a" �T�RERAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E RANO ROAD MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056 PROTOT ILE'P6E-VAV SCHEME: AIE RESTAURANT RRC968 /ERSION2022-1.0 RELEASE 8.10.2922 �4 �LL3 DUMPSTER DETAILS DATE. XVXX/XX 22189 A0.20 ,_, ELFCTgrnLcavourc� EF aErsraucruaal osrou � MENU BOARD ELEVATION A0.30 sCAll=.t2"=1w. �LIICZ—T �I'Hll 11 IL 11 A SIMILAR CONDRION AT BOTH — �� DwvE-THRU wLNDows. —F TII IF 111l .1AT IF T 11 DRIVE TMRu WINDOW s LOOP DETECTORS A0.30 SCALE. 1/4 C—ITwurvonnory YaE..cvL } SPEAKER FTG DETAIL Ao.ao scale ala"=v-o" DD � REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A0.30 SCALE Iia'=1'-0' WgMW DRIVE THRU ELEVATION AOaO scALe va"=r-o" KE1 NOTES o o[scR erbry i, xi � REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A0.30 SCALE Iia'=1'-0' WgMW DRIVE THRU ELEVATION AOaO scALe va"=r-o" KE1 NOTES ninRrc o[scR erbry i, xi O O O I'— CD O P11T O brvrvEcrbry evc O lIT HIED O O LcorvrvE_Tbry 11 O O O 0 0 " 0 O 12 II I u c y a � DRIVE THRU CANOPY PLAN A0.30 Scute lla"=1'-G' Y i ITIRERAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E RANO ROAD MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056 PROTOTVPE_P6E-VAV SCHEME: AIB RESTAURANT 4RC968 'ERSION'. 20221.0 RELEASE 8.10.2022 00 LL `s IIIN r � ,e rw,rRi � � coLore�aFnscnSHEETREVISIQNS irrP, ENI eoaau HEITE I xiv un i,n (Ef p eucriTra� vn uTEo a EELn e c.c. ErvT eo,.au E°FIll I'll4� k; D111-11 DRIVE THRU E uuE, (muvETaRuueE) "M Tp„ IIT R, CANOPY DETAILS D 4 Ri Ncoweuna , PERMR DATE XX/XX/XX JOB N0. 22189 DRIVE THRU DRIVE ELEVATION Aaaa scALe. 1l4"=ra" = E AO.30 DD � REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A0.31 Cue. tw"=ra° Aa.31 s aE.,�4 DE=,a THRU ELEVATION RIV KEY NOTES ,OK O 1111IFTE13T11F IF i OINT ISE1 O r _ O ra rwuLr.._uuzrrv.L C -11F blIST er O 1111 O IFT O nnNU ACIUFER. FNALF—ErbN Fta O` OF O rvor'narvurAcrureEz rvALcorvnEc brva O 1IT —1 © 0 M ILE LI 6 Flo —LITFr 11 p cseeiErvr A0.31 ALE UNDERGROUND PLAN . t,a=1a - A ex a>si Da 11'-z"^rFY 1� FIN III I HElEl 11' h FEccroEerx �� (;& 9 L.,., DRNE THRU ELEVATION =,o aFERAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E RAND ROAD MT. PROSPECT, IL 68056 PROTOTYPE: PSE-VAV SCHEME: AIB RESTAURANT 4RC968 VERSION: 2022-1.0 RELEASE 8.1 Q.2022 0004 1.1-1-11E 11TH-1EDIF111-1 11 PICKUP WINDOW CANOPY DETAILS tldfr PATE XXIXX/XX ,No. 22189 A0.31 KEYNDTES �rc 0` O 0' O O rvoop ✓/0n C A oOT LL V11111111RI—E.E-EllEll 11— ORTI—El FIE -11-1-1 MEI -l—°* STORE RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915E RAND ROAN MT. PROSPECT, IT 60056 PROTOTYPE." -V-AV SCHEIAE. AIR RESTAURANTHRC966 VERSION. 2022-1.0 RELEASE 8.102622 �\ v �L P r $ o I � IE I Aoe 1111-F— GENERAL NOTES or _ T. 111 u,RE wR "LET L 1— El I TSE ie.s av�a aaa .,aEEo Aa�v eEITI nTasxETs RAoaro� 0 ` s veezrTz�ua 11- 1.7111,ear rvER rvwR. AnOrv. O n 21 .11 I I 'v-- aE iSbrvs O O ROOF PLAN PERMITDATE. XXIXXIXX SR 12ROOF PLAN oa No. 22189 SCAEE V4= A1.50 ROOF a L 4 1�z 1�z 1�z 000000000 w---- -- �cF mum r T T {Ij) T-- Il ou i000� r r::- --— °o E FLOOR PLAN RAISING CANES RESTAURANT 915E RAND ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 6OU56 EQUIPMENT FLOOR PLAN 12.21.22 22189 �1 FENCE W/ WOOD SLATS Aa.21 scALE: aw.=vu. ENLARGED SITE PLAN scale ale.=lw'. C �RfRAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E RAND ROAD MT. PROSPECT, IT 60056 PROTOTYPE: P6E-VAV SCHEME: AIB RESTAURANT#RC968 VERSION: 2022-1.0 RELEASE 8.102022 ev Lu y- 0 .n1 E-NEEI 111-11.N ENLARGED SITE PLAN JITDATE: XXIXXIXX No. 22189 A0.21 uo6 Er B6 I[a coVRSc vov �o15i Lohl �Tq r3,vonT •lifi•ifi!• }s♦�#ft�i�# ••i••i•il:i ••••!•if•i! MATERIAL FINISHES EWFl EWF4 aexaen nem,an cz eorm.-a rI wer Mamessy Medium �ao4e. wick —r So malty moaU.:ron Spot Marcar �o soiomm proau<ts io n. ^latch solation p[oeucts id Ii�hl diR Sack rt�D [inch. mat..".efetl hv:l[ve3a! nsVike-Veth:al loins alx fivs!+ EWS-2 EM -4 EF -lo FRONT ENTRY ELEVATION Aa.1a Scale li4'=1'0^ DRIVE-THRU ELEVATION + h+ 9 FA°Yi.ailll dPk,, tilfi �,r 6BOil Elshop plCO Fl, V2l ]ji1_4 Tele:'J][ ]5J-1100 FaK Olt ]—r D1 RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 9151 RANO ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 COLORED ELEVATIONS DATE: 12.21.22 dos No. 22189 I'LL \ \Q \ \ PLANT LIST . ........ LANDSCAPE NOTES -1- ILI -.1- A- 11-I'Ll LADIIIIII All"111T 11 All A AIIII�L. 11 1.1T1'11TA 1. IINTIISITII LIIITI ILL 11= L_'IILSI_ D"'LL. AS, DT", LAND 1111111T 11 AIII III 1S.11. -ISD LTILIT111. 1. DID ITI1 I"AIL 1111 1 11 1 SILILLIII 11, 1-1 11.11L D.NTILII,, A' 'ASI.T.. LIA � All 11,1"11LA, ILI11 11-L ILDIIIII I -I III 11.111A I ILL IL""" SIIIIST. 11 --ILL T. A-1 1. T11 11 111LI -"ALL 11 111 MILI111 1-11 T.I I I'LL L-111 ",'A "ILL 11 ... .... .. LL .1 -T-TID 1- ANLI 11AIST 'AD ..LT1ILL- 12"Ll 11D 1. 111TIA-1 1"ft.1111"'D'AILOD I L11 -L, 11. IIALL 11 111 ID "LL LI_II'D L_SS_A.S D"S'T_=jTS MAINTENANCE NOTES S "' """'I.T"AA'�TS A"IIII 'AL11' 1"I.TII TLI 1111-ILAIIII .1 ALL LAHISSIA- 1. ILL L111111A11 I 11AINTAILED III A IIEAT IIII.L, "= AT ILL TL."' TL' E -DI 11111INI ILLITILIA D" "STEI.L. AND IITLEI -I AITLILLEE " -11ITI-IIIE. I. ALL IS-- Al- IIALL �E UIT IIE1 .1 T'A'H LILTI, ` I. .I IL ILLTI - IA IT %1AT".'1I= "LL ' LIST 1ATE111L 111TAIIED 11 A LLLDI A, I 1111�.l�l�TEI.�TIEIEI�'.�.IT.EIIAI. LEILA- 111- OA1IT ISATEIIAL .1 1-1 .ITIED -L- A A1111 11111L AlIE-III. CONCRETE PAVER NOTESIT HIS "'LL .1ZE . E`E T" -EITIE -111-ILLEA � I-ILITID. 11ILELI-, Eoa MT'L'1'N% TI'T.E' 'l" A ILITI-TIS11. 1 11 T2 DINIII'll'ILTL01 ATAJII A 1., .1 T� T. '1�1.L�'LIILSLLEL I A 1�1% I I I T NE GENERAL LAWN NOTES 1. IIAFIAITII 11A LL .... 11TE IIEIITINI 11 ALIALLAI'L_ ' 1 -TINA __L IL " , IT, 1.NADI TDIN A.ASEL. 'IN'DASTOR SHALL= LAIRIDIL-T.1 I T.ILIDL INIIALLATIS11. 1. ISSNIIA-I SIALL ILDE IIA- I. -D T� ILIEVI HNAL _'S_ A, IN VIATIS�,7111' .1-T DIDTI- TI AT TSI AN. S ITHII 11 11 11 IIDE� I�IIDI�ETILHOIEISILIILI'ES ALA . 'IIEC_TI A TI -HIS =TELLI� SITITILED ALD I IH D '=.I `LAN."IE =I'TIST D-LITIDDI. 1. IIAIIIITII IHILL 'E""E ALL A TD A'HI L_ .11, AIIT SLI.A S-A' A.A LA'AN INSTALLATI LLITIL 11-L A-IT.AIE. THIA HALL ILI 1, L'T ILLTI-TINIS. ILEAN- - IEILA-1� LEAD III LEA - ALL 1. A.ILL ILIIIIITIT EATAILI-EIIII Il SOLID SOD NOTES 1. ILANT 1- 1 HAIID TID -EL N11DTE1 -.1 I, IISTLETEL �IINLIIFII 1S1T.1I.TL1T1.H I '1 1 LIL. SIIIASI, IIEE IISII INN.LF'IIFI�'L I 11,1TH 'I Ell LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS 1-11113 L.T L-1111INI Iv. veep Isr uses IRIIT I III 1EIIIIE1111TA KI I,- IESI EDTOL ELILLEI I-IOE-1- A ... .... ....... 1111 RE1111IT!AL, I -I S-1 R -I H -b f,00- BELLE 'I FIRMA Dal" ` 7s2m 10- ,g 21..8".7M RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT s1 s E. Ratio Roao moul60056 LANDSCAPE PLAN 12.21.22 1. 22189 L 1.01 01 TREE PLANTING DETAIL .Ill—ILE Y, TREE PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND + nu aTrvk.m Ess FSE AND NOTES I ... .... I. .. ........ .. L—IL ILANI— III —LTITI—Il- 1-1— —T— T-1111. I'LL LT. T"I "'T L -T IN.T TI soar.lL I� IN -T-1. NIT- I.—I N.T IT -- 11LI. 03 CONCRETE L -T BALL R111-1 IUL— L. TAKE�,, " T .. .. I.LLTI— 1—TITI L A" "N .......... ..... T' —INI —Ill 1. 111T IL ILT TLIT IIIT ITTN 111"T" III IT LlI-lT III INI"ll 11-11IN1111111 11LIA T HT, N 111TI 111—T I V— 1-11 QT 'LI', . "I, II—L. -111 I—L 1� HT, III\ I HNIII "'T"' IN' 1,1EI II I 'I 1.11—LI 11.11IITeo . IVIN16L ILIll —TIILl ANIIII 1-11TIL—T— I—L. I� l� T11 IINTII Il T11 T,, I'TI, N � .11, NIT ILLI— I—. �l T11 A""' 1. I -T T111 �1-1 —TALLIT-1 ITIK- I.ILL I I �T—rvTS III I— ST—ILL, ITILL III —'Kl�, ll,�TII _TALLIT_ ILIN 1111NI. IAIL —L _ � __T AlIrv�T1u1'E'NT TI 11—ILL lIT rvo"IITrv'T LL—N. 02 SHRUB GROUNDCOVER DETAIL TI .1- 4245 North Cental D;W 0 � -2 B sufts 5-0- ELLE 2-8155.7M 77 FIRMA 000 RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS E 122122 NO 2 189 L1. 202 _3 IRRIGATION LEGEND. 0s n S`/MBOL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL NO „z- B,g az,D isp E. RAND ROA�yyD D i LAw,NSPRAVHFAD HDNTERtaoIRB PRosa4wTHMPRP1o�LE 112r a" " , ' uz' ,12' vr' oNHUNTERFLExscT11TUB11Nc a I ■ awNGENTER HUNTER/,UPU) PRos-0aw/ss UPLAGTUNOZZLE „z" A a' 112 REHEAD oNHUNTERF GTUBNG �a a- END STRIP HUNTER CNOZZLE ° ATEEVE LO 112 HEAD ON HUNTER FLEXBG TUB NG II I1P IR R v SLEEVE — __ ___ s� cRCLE HUNTER 1aD Ps/ Hs�s✓'IN c "TITER �12 z ] �O m ROLE HUNT HSI sVIN c ueTER D BOG R,aB Ps) HUNTER11 PAR7DRD E HST NG°oIT�SEMBLr A® BUBBLER HEAD HUNTER (ao as) PFI�HUNTER sSSTIC a SWING ao NT `EO — �� E ON Q� BUBBLER HEAD HUNTER HUNTER O0 Ps PCB REFER 11 BUBBLER NOZZLE ON QF 101 PLANS FOR SEE I'I RA.IS INGCANES ______-- �✓ / �� VALVE PRGTG PE6PPLAN;,a po UNTRULLER RR IT B, GROSS B F. � __� __= 'IRELESS �,INAND FREFZ`F GR a. FF - - T�T :.'� O MAINDNEPIPING REFER TUSPEG. „aSGHEDULE,DP/G I B.n m I } I SLEEVE a a G SSB,.E�U ��DDPLwA MUDNT�NTRD�RA/ — �1 �'� LATERAL HUNTERDSPEG ERao� As ,a, B,a mLARGER GLAsszDDP�G I ,z= IF GN7RGL � 1z 1�1 HUNTER PGE,DBGGNTRGL7GNEKIT tiLKRANFREETE 1A-112' °s DPN A ER REFER NOT —UNLESSOTHE N'_ HE 1l 1,E TEIRIUA OU OTHERWISE F1 1ENERPT 'I (✓�a Fr Ew.eT La rnM NAOTEIVADEFILIF Pl�3 ` - DRPL NETUB Nc HUNTER ZIT IIIERT NGS II� e //� IE a WATER rvIErER N4TiB TO SEES.]e5 REFIEI IUILNNG ERTO PLAN FOR SIZE TO a" y 's I F PREVENTER � ,• \ nASTER /AL/E HUNTER PGV REFER To BEAN FOR SUE 2' SLEEVE a $LEE E �°' 3/a ,z-\ ER / / aA 2 B ON NUM B e - GPM IAPPRUS) � ya. BTAT .AL,Es�E � -- i� o ,R114 �L 'IT)2T1, ��� �' FLOWCHART PIPE SIZE CHART L �0 / = 'L sal V�' g '„ Bra" 'B/a" SPRAY HE4D5: FLOW/GPM: PIPES 31-' ,2 _ 3;a' wO GPM fV a 1114 10ZZLE RBHDIUS 4.6 D14.6-2 750 1�1/4C y 4. L' /I !- SIZE. 27.1 -350 12's fin. Sia. 1l2" ,12'• 2s r2° ill 3,a",.7 ,IZ G�\ 15QE 16' 3.1 35.1-55.0 2'1/2" N. ALBERT STREET "s 15C 15 2.] Bs 15H 16 2.0 LIR 150 i5' 1.0 FLOWCHART 6 / 121 t2 2.9 ROTARY HEADS- / 12H 12' ?.4 BE FULL -CI CLE BU 12 12' 1.0 4D'PART-CIRCLE Q 4.0 12Q 12' ] 4D'FULL-CICLE 8.0 UPD' 1.] 1DH 1D• DB JE 6 Do 1E .4 8F B' 1.] aH B' BE B' 6 8Q B' .4 Ov 1 .1 4245 Nl CBMial EKRY �SE7H HHDMAN f,o BELLE d � ' FIRMA DalyxTa4q'5205 a V CIy It BIPPHILIU, 6800 FishI , PI TX75024 T I'. '_0 10C F 9-69 110 ON 11 ETO T, �=OHIPTTI c RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT 915 E. RAND ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 IRRIGATION PLAN DATE. 12.21.22 JOB W. 221 M L2.01 MAINLINE, uTEw,L AND GIRING NOTES: IPELEssurvANO FPEExES rvsaa rvx� 1. ALL 24 VOLT LEAD AND COMMON VALVE WIRING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF OF -14 GA. SINGLE CONDUCTOR. i REFER TO MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPER WIRE SIZE. WIRE SPLICES SHALL BE 3M-DBY RMA PER PE ORD INAT AND WATERPROOF RRIGAN NSYSTEMVAI"SPECIFICATIONS. CAPE rn w L 2. COORDINATE INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE EWITH WITHTNT OF SPE ENSURE ALL PLANT MATERIAL RILL BE WATERED IN.4CCDRD.4NCE \NITH THE INTENT OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. n 3. PIPING AND VALVES IN P4VINGSHDYYN FOR CLARITY INSTALL IN ADJACENT PLANTING BED ORLAWNAREA. � -i•'i$ `'"""o` xhp_ rnnorroa 4, L PIP ING SHALL HAVEA MINIMUM OF 12 OF COVER MAINLINE AND PIPING UNDER PAVING SHALL HAVE AAMINIMUM OF 18" OF COVER. ALL FITTINGS TO BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. USE WELD -ON #705 SOLVENT AND WALLMOLUT CONTROLLER WALLMOUNT SENSOR ER SOURCE LAYOUT 0P£6 PRIMER FOR PVC CONNECTIONS PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. 5. SIZE ALL LATERAL PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS OF NOT EXCEEDING 5 FPS. REFERENCE PIPE SIZE CHART. 6. CONNECT LAWN SPRAY SPRAY, TREE BUBBLER. AND DRIP INDICATOR HEADS TO LATERAL PIPING WITH HUNTER l S SJ SWING JDINT. CONNECT ROTARY HEADS TO LATERAL PIPE WITH HUNTER HSJ SWING JOINT. 7. PERFORM ELECTRICAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL BUILDING CODE. POWER LCXV) SHALL BE LOCATED IN,A JUNCTION BOXAND HARDWIRED WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF CONTROLLER LOCATION BY GEN ERAL G,11 ani GUT I09Ls CONTRACTOR. 6800 SI,, 14lno, Iatl. PTX75024 -,,,, n+oE Tele'. 97 ]6`JJI00 U, 97 69101 "ur.m ixe8. INSTALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES AND WIRE SPLICES IN TEN (10") INCH ROUND HIGHLINE VALVE BOXES. xa P P sUE 9. INSTALL SLE EVES ON D ER ALL HARDSCAPE SO BRANDS SUCH AS ROADS. DRIVES. WALKS, ETC. WHETH ER SHOWN ORNOT. SLEEVES SHALL BECLASS 200 PVC, SIZEDAS NOTEDON PLANSAND INSTALLED BY 9� IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. "' � .1 .ra v. r, 111111 IIHII I III III—I A r12 -nK."ar a2 III_111-111-11F,II IIIII � SII � ao, w4 2 10. ADJUST NOZZLES FOR SITUATIONS THAT REQUIRE LESS THAN 90 DEGREE RADIUS SPRAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOTE CONTROL 1AFVB REMOTE CONTROL DRIP YON E KIT TREE BUBBLER PVC E SIZE CHART ADJUSTABLE NOZZLES. NO OVERSPRAV' ALLOWED ON ANY HARDSCAPE SURFACES. - ox 11. DES ICN PRESS UREIS57.0 URP51.STATICPRESSUREIB6SPSI. TEN DAYS PRIOR DONT SSTARTOFCONSTRUCTION, vLL TO PR CEED. PRESSURE. IF STATIC PRESSURE IS LESS THAN STATED DO NOT START WORK UNTIL NOTIFIED - °u 12. IA IN INCH DISTANCE BETWEEN MAIN LINE AND LATERAL LI NE FITTINGS (EXCEPT FOR REDUCER BUSH INGS) TO x .nn om-run ,.rr_ rr re.nVr," E EIGHTEEN (18 11NCHE5 AND MINIMUM HORIZONTAL OISTANCE OF TWENTY-FOUR (24 ) INCHES BETWEEN xnnrn+n. ANY VAL\/ES THAT ARE INSTALLED SIDE BY SIDE. _ 13. INSTALL REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE KITS IN TWELVE BY SEVENTEEN(1-17)INCH HIGHLINEVALVEBOXES. 1111-111D HO 11 THAI IRUIBNTA 11 a_re z om 14. INSTALL DRIPLINE MINIMUM OF 2"AND A MAXIMUM OF 4" FROM HARDSCAPE SURFACES. STAKE DRIPLINE AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM DYVNERC REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE INSTALLATION. DO NOT EXCEED MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONSOF 5'-0" PS IN DRIPLINE. _ mEoocu' iry 15. PROVIDE AND INSTALL DISTRIBUTION TUBING. STAKES, EMITTERS, TRANSFER FITTINGS, DIFFUSER BUG CAP11 ET, CONTROL ZON E KITS ETC. NECESSARY FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE BEDS. ALL PVC HEADER PIPING aussLvaaO atiFccaox LAWN SPRAY HEAD DRIP INDICATOR HEAD TO BE CLASS 200 PVC SOLVENT WELD PIPE. INSERT ALL HUNTER BLD BARBED FITTINGS PER n.anrv�' MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. INSTALL ONE DRIP INDICATOR HEAD FOR EACH DRIP ZONE. INDICATOR HEAD TO BE A HUNTER ECO INDICATOR HEAD. 16. AIRNACUUM RELIEF VALVE TO BE HUNTER PLD -ARV INSTALLED IN ASIX -INCH DX HIGHLINE VALVE BOX WITH E. » aorE OF GRAVEL SUMP AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE TO BE HUNTER AFV INSTALLED IN ASIX -INCH (6") HIGHLINE'i VALVEBCXWFHGOFGRAVELSUMP. .. w..,, r..... V 17. ALLHUNTERPLD-CV DRIP LINE AND DISTRIBUTION TUBING TOBEINSTALLED BELOW FINISH e� APPROXIMATELY4 TOB PER MAN DISTRIB TIO RECOMMENDATIONS ALL BELO FINISH INSTALLED re 6AN-. MINIMUM OF 1 -0 AND MAXIMUM OF 1 8 ROW SPACING UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE VERIFYTHE EXACT EM FTER FLOW EMITTER SPACING. AND ROW SPACING WITH MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLING TO PROVIDEPROPERPRECIPITATIONRATEBASEDON PLANT MATERIAL AND SOIL TYPE TUSINGTOSESTAKED WH H 12 GA. GALVANIZED TIE DOWNS. INSTALL STAKES EVERY 3-0' ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH OF TUBING ANDA MINIMUMOF24" FROMANYFITTINGS. RAISING CANE'S •".`•° .x'"." 13. INCLUDE THE ACT O°.wGALLOWANCES FOR PROVIDING AND INSTALLING AIR BELIEF VALVESAND FLUSH RESTAURANT AIR RELIEF VALVE IN70MAZIC FLUSH FALVE TYPICAL SHISTIFACE DRIPLINE LAYOUT VEEFOR THE DRIP SYSTEM. EXACT QUANTITY. AND LOCATION OF THESE DEVICES WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. IN GENERAL ALL AIR RELIEF VALVES WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE HIGH POINTS AND FLUSH VALVES WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE LOW POINTS OF EXHAUST HEADER. ALLOW FOR 915 E. RANO ROAD KIPROXIrvIATELY ONE (I) AIR RELIEF VALVE AND APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) FLUSH VALVE FOR EACH DRIP ZONE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 aai 19.E POSSIBLE LOCATE ALL MAINLINES, VALVES, DR CONTROL NARES SHALL BE LOCATED AND INSTALLED REVISIONS x rLyunn n�V=xno.".r - emoa. d. ny,s ow°moia.0ax OUTSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 20.OVIDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIAL NECESSARY TO HAND DIG WITHIN ALL EXISTING TREE ROOT ZONES. - - CONTRACTOR MUST STAKE DITCHES AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY ...r TRENCHING OR DIGGING. onm "c+Ton _ 21. ALL STATE OF OHIO LAD—CLES AND ALL LOCAL CODES/ORDINANCES ARE MADE PART OF THESE PLANS AND 11 SPECIFICATIONS WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT. THESE LAWS AND ORDINANCES WILL SUPERCEDE THE PLANS, rnn rtir n �xQ. 5 DETAILS. ANDIORSPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT THEY ARE TO T INCLUDEANY AND ALL COST NECESSARY TO MEET OR EXCEED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN OR LOCAL KENOEHA CODES CONCERNING LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION TYPICAL DRIPLINE LAYOUT TYPICAL DRIPLNE LAYOUT TYPICAL DRIPLINE LAYOUT 22, PROVIDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIAL NECESSARY TO THE IRRIGATION PER LOCAL CODES. 11 " " IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS DATE. 12.21.22 JOB NO. 221 S9 RZ451JOILi CBMmI F}QY SETH HEIDMAV VSA BELLE rw-sw L2.02 �` FIRMA "*I- T` '-- EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE E ET --::N.:::: 1� LED . . .... —1,E 11111TIE1 ILE F4 Y5 . .... 1.11T -EL IF L L � I I I L L, ILT�I�LTU"�l 1 11 ITEI F I I lF R LIF L"T, � F, 1- FIL11-111IFT-0 FaLFF STATISTICS 111111FE1 —I�E FIE 1 2 11 1111 u I IRFIF— LINI — I IF, "I M EGA- model: Cl -WS -W70612 Custom LED Exterior Sconce PRODUCT DESCRIPTION A purposeful asymmetrical wall mounted up or down light design brightly illuminates walkways and provides security with an attractive simple architectural form. FEATURES Luminaire may be rotated 180° when mounting ADA compliant for, low profile design ETL & cETL wet location listed, IP65 rated Up or down light Dark Sky friendly Aluminum construction Full range dimming when used with compatible dimmers* Driver located in inside fixture Universal driver (120V-22OV-277V) 60,000 hour rated life Color Temp: 3000K CRI: 90 ORDER NUMBER LED Delivered Model Heiaht Wattaae Voltaae Lumens Lumens Finish Fixture Type: I A Catalog Number: Project: Location: SPECIFICATIONS Construction: Aluminum Light Source: High output LED. Finish: Black (BK) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Standards: ETL & cETL wet location listed IP 65. ADA compliant. CI -WS -W70612 1/" 25W 1)N/- 20V )77V ' 45 610 I BK fl/r,t:k Example: CI -WS -W70612 -BK *- Refer to dimmer compatibility report for more details modernforms.com Headquarters/Eastern Distribution Center Central Distribution Center Western Distribution Center Phone (800) 526.2588 44 Harbor Park Drive 1600 Distribution Ct 1750 Archibald Avenue Fax (800) 526.2585 Port Washington, NY 11050 Lithia Springs, GA 30122 Ontario, CA 91760 WAC Lighting retains the right to modify the design of our products at anytime as part of the company's continuous improvement program. NOV 2017 46 atlas (aWallLight Lighting Products WLMFC43LED 43 Watt LED Wall Light & lighting LISTED facts SPECIFICATIONS: Fixture Type Project Information Job Name RA L S LNG CANE'S Fixture Type 43 Watt LED Medium Wall Light Catalog Number WLMFC43LED Approved by Lumens: 3245 Watts: 41.08 Lumens/Watt: 77.6 CRI: 72 CCT: 4278 Lifespan: 200,000+ hrs.' Construction: Rugged Traditional aluminum die cast housing provides proven environmental protection for LED modules. Traditional fixture design provides a familiar look and standard installation requirements. Retaining this look allows the ability to upgrade fixtures gradually, while retaining the same overall fixture appearance throughout a facility. Glare Free: Positioning of the LED modules within the housing result in light directed to desired locations and eliminates offensive light. Optics: The International Dark Sky Association has approved this product as a full cutoff, fully shielded luminaire. Positioning of the LEDs (along with Patent Pending thermal management system) results in the light being directed to desired locations eliminating glare and offensive light. Atlas' proprietary forward throw optic design provides higher efficiency, DIMENSIONS: greater footcandles and targets the light as needed. Thermal Management: Atlas'Patent Pending exclusive Thermal Management System—features a unique internal design that allows for lower operating temperatures which results in a brighter, whiter light, more stable color and longer LED and driver life. Listings: Luminaire is certified to UL Standards for Wet Locations Lighting Facts Certified DesignLights Consortium qualified luminaire, eligible for rebates from DLC member utilities. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ AC Input: 120/208/240/277 V Driver: knock out Constant current, Class 2,120-277 VAC, 50-60 Hz on both High Efficiency— min. 88% sides Off -State Power: 0 Watts Dimming: 0-10V LEDs: 4100K CCT Epoxy Guard TM protective conformal coated boards Atlas LEDs provide higher lumen output, greater energy efficiency and more reliable fixture performance. They are tested and binned at 700mA which is the actual operating current used in Atlas LED luminaires, giving a better representation of actual performance. Warranty: Atlas Lighting Products provides a 5 year limited warranty for this product. A full warranty can be found at www.alpinc.com. Testing: Atlas LED luminaires have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM -79 & LM -80, and have received the Department of Energy"Lighting Facts"label. Installation: Fixture retains the same knock -out sizes and positions as previous models, reducing wiring costs. Photo Control: For factory installed 120V button photo control add suffix PC to part number. Rebates and Incentives are available in many areas. 'LED Life Span Based Upon LM -80 Test Results Contact an Atlas Representative for more information. ATLAS LIGHTING PRODUCTS, INC. Made in the USA of US and imported PO BOX 23481 BURLINGTON, NC 27216 parts. Meets Buy Americ,~ 800-849-8485 1 FAX: 336-227-0110 1 www.atiaslightingproducts.com requirements within the AR47 1/O/f fft 19S �''��n ���� Wall Light LightinProducts PHOTOMETRIC 0' �D 2U' 15 I U' 5' U' S' I U' I5' 2U 25� MOUNTING DETAIL ATLAS LIGHTING PRODUCTS, INC. PO BOX 23481 BURLINGTON, NC 27216 800-849-8485 1 FAX: 336-227-0110 1 www.atiaslightingproducts.com WLMFC43LED 43 Watt LED Medium Wall Light ENERGY SAVINGS o° /' 1 Atlas Lighting Products, Inc. infighting f acfto A Program of the U.S. DUE Light Output (Lumens) 3245 Watts 41.08 Lumens per Watt (Efficacy) 77.6 Color Accuracy 72 Color Rendering Index (CRI) ColorLlihtt (Brightc , ed Color Temperature (CC -Q 4278 "' 2700K 3000K 4500K 6500K All results^ are according to IESNA LM -79-2008: Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric Testing of Solid -State Lighting. The: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) verifies product test data and results. Visit www.lightingfacts.com for the Label Reference Guide. Registration Number PRB4-4YH6AK (10/29/2014) Modell Number: WLMFC43LED Upgrade: 10/8/2014 Type: Lurninairee - Area/Roadway Made in the USA of US and imported parts. Meets Buy American requirements within the ARRA. 48 LED HID WATTAGE ANNUAL COST SOURCE WATTAGE TOTAL WATTAGE USED ANNUAL COST ANNUAL SAVINGS 43 $19 100 129 $77 $58 43 $19 150 185 $100 $81 43 $19 175 210 $112 $93 o° /' 1 Atlas Lighting Products, Inc. infighting f acfto A Program of the U.S. DUE Light Output (Lumens) 3245 Watts 41.08 Lumens per Watt (Efficacy) 77.6 Color Accuracy 72 Color Rendering Index (CRI) ColorLlihtt (Brightc , ed Color Temperature (CC -Q 4278 "' 2700K 3000K 4500K 6500K All results^ are according to IESNA LM -79-2008: Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric Testing of Solid -State Lighting. The: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) verifies product test data and results. Visit www.lightingfacts.com for the Label Reference Guide. Registration Number PRB4-4YH6AK (10/29/2014) Modell Number: WLMFC43LED Upgrade: 10/8/2014 Type: Lurninairee - Area/Roadway Made in the USA of US and imported parts. Meets Buy American requirements within the ARRA. 48 Specifications EPA: 1.01 ft, (o.av m') Length: 33" 30K 3000K (a3.a,M) Width: 13" NEMA twist -lock receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 15 (33.0 cm) Height H1: 7-1/2 XVOLT (19.0 cm) Height H2: 3-1/2" Weight 27lbs (max): (Z) kg) D -Series Size 1 LED Area Luminaire 4,,� r mmi°u�vu I QP NIGHTIIME r®1 FRIENDLY I,y, ,yami ei is art L H2 H1 l Catalog Y3, Y4, Y5 & Y6 Number Notes Type Introduction The modern styling of the D -Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. The D -Series distills the benefits of the latest in LED technology into a high performance, high efficacy, long -life luminaire. The outstanding photometric performance results in sites with excellent uniformity, greater pole spacing and lower power density. It is ideal for replacing up to 75OW metal halide in pedestrian and area lighting applications with typical energy savings of 65% and expected service life of over 100,000 hours. t�VI�IIUIIIIIiI�U1JyJ��l��fY. EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA NLTAIR2 PIRHN DDBXD DSX1 LED DSX1 LED Forward optics 30K 3000K TIS Type Ishort T5VS Type Vvery short MVOLT, Shipped included NEMA twist -lock receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 15 P1 P4' P71 40K 4000 1( (Automotive) T5S Type Vshort' XVOLT SPA Square pole mounting 0-10v dimming wires pulled outsidefixture (for use with an P2 PSI P8 50K 5000 K US Type 11 short TSM Type medium' (277V -480V) 6'R RPA Round pole mounting I EGS P3 P61 P91 T214 Type 11 medium TSW TypeVwide' 1209 WBA Wall bracket' Rotated optics T3S Type III short BLC Backlight control ° 208' SPUMBA Square pole universal mounting adaptorll P10' P12' T3M Type III medium LOCO Left corner cutoff^ 2409 RPUMBA Round pole universal mounting adaptor' P111 P13 El T4M Type IV medium RCCO Right corner cutoff, 2779 Shipped separately TFTM Forward throw 3479 WAS DD13XDU Mast arm mounting bracketadaptor medium 4801 (specify finish)' Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLightAIRgeneration 2enabled 13 PIRHN Netwoik,high/lowmotion/ambient sensor ° PER NEMA twist -lock receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 15 PERS Five -pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 15" PER7 Seven -pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) " DMG 0-10v dimming wires pulled outsidefixture (for use with an Bi -level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30'mountingheight, external control, ordered separately) " D5 Dual switching I "," PIR HighAow, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15'mountingheight, House-sideshield ambient sensor enabled at 5fc i"' PIRH HighAtw,motion/ambientsensor,15-30'mountingheight, Double fuse (208,240,480V)' ambient sensor enabledat5fc °'I PIRIFC3V High low,motion/ambientsensor,8-15'mountingheirhti Right rotated optics' ambient sensor enabled at 1 fc `112I PIRH1FC3V Bi -level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30'mountingheight, Buy America(n) Act Compliant ambient sensor enabled at Ito �O�I FAO Field adjustable output) 1 Shipped installed HIS House-sideshield SF Single fuse, (120,277, 347V) 9 DF Double fuse (208,240,480V)' L90 Left rotated optics' R90 Right rotated optics' HA SOT ambient operations' BAA Buy America(n) Act Compliant Shipped separately BS Bird spikes -1 EGS External glare shield DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white ppV� VM pull' V I iIl�ilpll Viil�ll�imlll�� One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1 -800 -705 -SERV (1378) • ..lilt i > I v cci DSX1-LED �� elli�� yllp °i',uW��p,,�IlF, illllllll V�"'a' © 2011-2021 Acuity Brands Gghtng, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev_ 07/19/21 VIII IU Page 1 of 49 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR EGS- External Glare Shield NOTES 1 HA not available with P4, P5, P6, P7, P9 and P13. 2 P10, P11. P12 or P13 and rotated optic (L90, R90) only available together. 3 Any Type 5 distribution with photocell, is not available with WBA 4 N of available with HS. 5 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 6 XVOLT only suitable for use with P3, P5, P6, P7, P9 and P13. 7 XVOLT works with any voltage between 277V and 48OV. 8 XVOLT not available with fusing (SF or DF) and not available with PIR, PIRH, PIR1 FC3V, PIRH1 FC3V. 9 Single fuse (SF) requires 120V, 277V or 347V Double fuse (DF) requires 208V, 240V or 480V XVOLT not available with fusing (SF or DF. 10 Suitable for mounting to round poles between 3.5" and 12" diameter. 11 Universal mounting brackets intended for retrofit on existing, pre -drilled poles only. 1.5 G vibration load rating per ANCI C136.31. Only usable when pole's drill pattern is NOT Lithonia template #8 12 Must order fixture with SPA option. Must be ordered as a separate accessory; see Accessories information, For use with 2-3/8" diameter mast arm (not included). 13 Must be ordered.vith PI RHN. Sensor cover available only in dark bronze, black, white and natural aluminum colors. 14 Must be ordered with NLTAI R2. For more information on naught Air 2v, I , Ink. 15 Photocell ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. See accessories. Shorting cap included. 16 If ROAM' node required, it must be ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. Node evith integral dimming. 17 DMG not available with PI RHN, PERS, PER7, PIR, PIRH, PIRI FC3V or PIRHI FC3V, FAO. 18 Provides 50/50fxture operation via (2) Independent drivers. Not available with PER, PERS, PER7, PIR or PIRH. Not available P1, P2, P3, P4 or P5. 19 Requires (2) separately switched circuits with isolated neutral. 20 Reference Controls Option Default settings table on page 4. 21 Reference Motion Sensor table on page 4 to see functionality. 22 Not available with other dimming controls options. 23 Not available with BLC, LCCO and RCCO distribution. Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories Information. 24 Must be ordered with fixture for factory po,drilling. 25 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER, PERS or PER7 option. See Control Option Table on page 4. 26 For retrofit use only. Only usable when pole's drill pattern is NOT Lithonia template 48. HANDHOLE ORIENTATION D B A Handhole lei ylllate P,8 Top of Pole 1.75" for aluminum poles 2.75' for other pole Types 1.325" 2.650" Tenon Mounting Slipfitter Illlllllluuu���� 12.48 2-3/8" Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. DLL127F 1.5 JU Photocell - SSL twist -lock (120-277V)" DLL347F 1.5 CULJU Photocell - SSL twist -lock (347V)'5 DLL48OF 1.5 CUL)U Photocell - SSL twist-lock(48OV)" DSHORTSBKU Shorting cap'' DSXIHS30CJ House -side shield for P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5" DSH1 HS 4000 House -side shield for P6 and P7" DSH1 HS 60C U House -side shield for P8, P9, P10, PI I and P12'B PUMBA DDBHD U". Square and round pole universal mounting bracket (specify finish)" KMA8 DDBKDU Mast arm mounting bracketadaptor(specify finish) " DSHIEGS(FINISH) U External glare shield For more control options, isit 0 1_ and nline- EGS- External Glare Shield NOTES 1 HA not available with P4, P5, P6, P7, P9 and P13. 2 P10, P11. P12 or P13 and rotated optic (L90, R90) only available together. 3 Any Type 5 distribution with photocell, is not available with WBA 4 N of available with HS. 5 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 6 XVOLT only suitable for use with P3, P5, P6, P7, P9 and P13. 7 XVOLT works with any voltage between 277V and 48OV. 8 XVOLT not available with fusing (SF or DF) and not available with PIR, PIRH, PIR1 FC3V, PIRH1 FC3V. 9 Single fuse (SF) requires 120V, 277V or 347V Double fuse (DF) requires 208V, 240V or 480V XVOLT not available with fusing (SF or DF. 10 Suitable for mounting to round poles between 3.5" and 12" diameter. 11 Universal mounting brackets intended for retrofit on existing, pre -drilled poles only. 1.5 G vibration load rating per ANCI C136.31. Only usable when pole's drill pattern is NOT Lithonia template #8 12 Must order fixture with SPA option. Must be ordered as a separate accessory; see Accessories information, For use with 2-3/8" diameter mast arm (not included). 13 Must be ordered.vith PI RHN. Sensor cover available only in dark bronze, black, white and natural aluminum colors. 14 Must be ordered with NLTAI R2. For more information on naught Air 2v, I , Ink. 15 Photocell ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. See accessories. Shorting cap included. 16 If ROAM' node required, it must be ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. Node evith integral dimming. 17 DMG not available with PI RHN, PERS, PER7, PIR, PIRH, PIRI FC3V or PIRHI FC3V, FAO. 18 Provides 50/50fxture operation via (2) Independent drivers. Not available with PER, PERS, PER7, PIR or PIRH. Not available P1, P2, P3, P4 or P5. 19 Requires (2) separately switched circuits with isolated neutral. 20 Reference Controls Option Default settings table on page 4. 21 Reference Motion Sensor table on page 4 to see functionality. 22 Not available with other dimming controls options. 23 Not available with BLC, LCCO and RCCO distribution. Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories Information. 24 Must be ordered with fixture for factory po,drilling. 25 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER, PERS or PER7 option. See Control Option Table on page 4. 26 For retrofit use only. Only usable when pole's drill pattern is NOT Lithonia template 48. HANDHOLE ORIENTATION D B A Handhole lei ylllate P,8 Top of Pole 1.75" for aluminum poles 2.75' for other pole Types 1.325" 2.650" Tenon Mounting Slipfitter Illlllllluuu���� 12.48 2-3/8" RPA AS3-5190 AS3-5280 AS3-5 290 AS3-5 390 AS3-5 320 A53-5 490 2-7/8" RPA AST25-190 AST25-280 AST25-290 AST25-390 AST25-320 AST25-490 4" RPA AST35-190 AST35-280 AST35-290 AST35-390 AST35-320 AST35-490 DSX1 Area Luminaire - EPA *Includes luminaire and Integral mounting arm. Othertenons, arms, brackets or other accessories are not included in this EPA data. pi' iIM illlll'ViIV�ilpllViiliNiiiull�� One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV(7378) DSX1-LED "�� �illi� LIVE I�i, illlll'W,VI�,iiI. VIVIIIIV' iww © 2011-2021 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev_ 07/19/21 Page 2 of 50 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR uuui ��r »»y w IU To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting's I�� .,�� `, /�� ,, r,v,r 1 h1°i 1WPd, F'. Isofootcandle plots forth e DSX1 LED 60C 100040K. Distances are in units of mounting height (25'). LEGEND 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 0.1 fc n _ , 0.5 fC 2 2 " 2 . 2 o 1.0 fc o �':. "\�J"`M^"""'I �.. A ° . `n �I v o .:f a� o o f i,� r , r ✓r 0 2 , , ,� .., 2 , ::„ --- ,a.., 2 3 T1S a is 3 T2Mv,� 4 3 -4 T2S.�'� iro .3 -.-.. T3 -a ' 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 6 3 2 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 3 "e 1A 2 :dam 0 1 2 3 4 M i 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 - 3 2 u ..,... 3 1 2 ^ ,. '"r, \ 1 (tf, �y.f I ' 0 ,F' ^I 0 F 01 ^r s' l 0 .. r ;. r .- .... ..-. T35 a > :''' i6; 3 ... T4M a ';, „ iS 4 > TFTM ,... id; - 4 to , ___. __ , __. T5VS " -4 tea; a 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 .... .... , 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 a 4 3 2 1 .q'" 0 1 2 3 4 . W �_ 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 _.. M u o { t 21 a v oCD. 2 3T5S" a 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 d 4 n11 0 , T5M a -. 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 -22 3 .,__., 4 . . A�--TSW.'� .1 -4 ,BL r' 4 o 2 3 4 LOCO I I is „ i�, 2 3 -.. RCCO a , ,a �a " i ul ��� yV� ipV' iljlll' V I IVilllllu! uiiV��i cull ��� One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1 -800 -705 -SERV (1378) • ,wlilli )i DSX1-LED © 2011-2021 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev- 07/19/21 III IU Page 3 of 51 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Electrical Load Allows the luminaire to be manually dimmed, FAO device Cannot be used with other controls options that luminaire; wired to the driver dimming leads. effectively trimming the light output. need the 0-10Vleads DS Drivers wired independently for 50/50 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Independently wired drivers Requires two separately switched circuits. Consider IIIIIIIIIIIIIII allowing for 50/50 operation. Usefactors relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures nLight AIR as a more cost effective alternative. PERS or PER7 Twist -lock photocell receptide Compatible with standard twist -lock photocells for dusk to dawn operation, or advanced control nodes IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIuiiullllPui( Pins 4 & 5 to dimming leads on driver, Pins 6 & 7 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII' .............. from o -40C (32 -104'F). PIR or PIRH I Luminaires dim when no occupancy is detected. Acuity Controls SRGR Also available with FIRM FC3V when the sensor 8-15' mounting; PIRH for 15-30' mounting photocell is used for dusk -to -dawn operation. NLTAIR2PIRHN ormotiaton.on Ing' nLightAlocella Motion and ainbient 1 fight sensing with group response. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over -ride when 120 208 240 277 347 480 usingrammedandcommissionetl from thegronsors from the ground using the CIAIRity Pro app. o c 3z F 1.04 P1 30 530 54 0.45 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.10 0.12 SIC 41'F 1.04 P2 30 700 70 0.59 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.16 10IC 507 1.03 15°C 50'F 1.02 P3 30 1050 102 0.86 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.30 0.22 20`C 687 1.01 P4 30 1250 125 1.06 0.60 0.52 0.46 0.37 0.27 25'C 770E 1.00 Forward Optics 30'C 867 0.99 (Non -Rotated) PS 30 1400 138 1.16 0.67 0.58 0.51 0.40 0.29 3s c 957 0.98 P6 40 1250 163 1.36 0.78 0.68 0.59 0.47 0.34 40°C 104'F 0.97 P7 40 1400 183 1.53 0.88 0.76 0.66 0.53 0.38 P8 60 1050 207 1.74 0.98 0.87 0.76 0.64 0.49 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance P9 60 1250 241 2.01 1.16 1.01 0.89 0.70 0.51 Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the platforms noted in a PIC 60 530 106 0.90 0.52 0.47 0.43 0.33 0.27 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM -80-08 and projected per I ESNA TM -21 -11). Rotated Optics Pll 60 700 137 1.15 0.67 0.60 0.53 0.42 0.32 To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number (Requires L90 of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. or R90) P12 60 1050 207 1.74 0.99 0.87 0.76 0.60 0.46 P13 60 1250 231 1.93 1.12 0.97 0.86 0.67 0.49 0 1.00 25,000 0.96 50,000 0.92 100,000 0.85 High Level Dimmed Phototcell Dwell Ramp -up Ramp -down Option (when State triggered) Operation Time Time Time PIR or PIRH 3V (37%) 1 O (100%) Enabled @ 5FC 5 min 3 sec S min Output Output *PIR1 FC3V or 3V (37%) 1 O (100%) Enabled @ 1 FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min PIRHIFC3V Output Output for use when motion sensor is used as dusk to dawn control. Nomenclature Description Functionality Primary control device Notes FAO Field adjustable output device installed inside the Allows the luminaire to be manually dimmed, FAO device Cannot be used with other controls options that luminaire; wired to the driver dimming leads. effectively trimming the light output. need the 0-10Vleads DS Drivers wired independently for 50/50 The luminaire is wired to two separate circuits, Independently wired drivers Requires two separately switched circuits. Consider luminaire operation allowing for 50/50 operation. nLight AIR as a more cost effective alternative. PERS or PER7 Twist -lock photocell receptide Compatible with standard twist -lock photocells for dusk to dawn operation, or advanced control nodes Twist -lock photocells such as DLL Elite Pins 4 & 5 to dimming leads on driver, Pins 6 & 7 that provide 0-10V dimming signals. or advanced control nodes such as ROAM. are capped inside luminaire PIR or PIRH Motion sensors with integral photocell. PIR for Luminaires dim when no occupancy is detected. Acuity Controls SRGR Also available with FIRM FC3V when the sensor 8-15' mounting; PIRH for 15-30' mounting photocell is used for dusk -to -dawn operation. NLTAIR2PIRHN ormotiaton.on Ing' nLightAlocella Motion and ainbient 1 fight sensing with group response. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over -ride when nLight Air rSDGR nLight n dwirelesscore photocell and wireless communication. wirelessly connected to the Wight Eclypse. usingrammedandcommissionetl from thegronsors from the ground using the CIAIRity Pro app. cul ll� yV� ipV' iljlll' V I IVilllllu! uilW��uull ��� One Lith onia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1 -800 -705 -SERV (7378) • .w Bili )i i v.cc DSX1-LED �� �ullll� ,flll�h�Vi',uIIIIIIy,VI�,,iII, Vlllllll4!V' V�,,"'a' Q2011-2021 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev_ 07/19/21 IIIIII IIIIIU Page 4 of 5L COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Lumen Output Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. II III U � I t a i I I I ,: v, o a Ill�lltlll III�IIIIIIIIII II Iu��u�uY�lu�ufi a illlui����h�u� kdl��iu�hhi f o , 161Vi��ii a i 11111111111111191I „' f' IIY��,�� I1IAN IIIIi,11N Illli„Z IIIIIIf1r11Ills 11j"M ild 113N1 1011C'u 11'217.1= IIIII� 101,1111111)301 IIII 11I'� T15 6,457 20 2 120 6,956 2 0 2 129 7,044 2 0 2 130 US 6,450 2 0 2 119 6,949 2 0 2 129 7,037 2 0 2 130 T2M 6,483 1 0 1 120 6,984 2 0 2 129 7,073 2 0 2 131 T35 6,279 2 0 2116 6,764 2 0 2 125 6,850 2 0 2 127 T3M 6,468 1 0 2.. 120 6,967 1 0 2 129 7,056 1 0 2 131 T4M 6,327 1 0 2 117 6,816 1 0 2 126 6,902 1 0 2 128 30 530 P7 54W TFTM 6,464 1 0 2 120 6,963 1 0 2 129 7,051 1 0 2 131 TSVS 6,722 2 0 0 124 7,242 3 0 0 134 7,334 3 0 0 136 T5S 6,728 2 0 1 125 7,248 2 0 1 134 7,340 2 0 1 136 T5M 6,711 30 1 124 7,229 3 0 1 134 7,321 3 0 2 136 T5W 6,667 3 0 2. 123 7,182 3 0 2 133 7,273 3 0 2 135 BLC 5,299 1 0 198 5,709 1 0 2 106 5,781 1 0 2 107 LCCO 3,943 1 0 273 4,248 1 0 2 79 4,302 1 0 2 80 RCCO 31943 1 0 273 4,248 1 0 2 79 4,302 1 0 2 80 TIS 8,249 2 0 2.. 118 8,886 2 0 2 127 8,999 2 0 2 129 T25 8,240 2 0 2 118 8,877 2 0 2 127 8,989 2 0 2 128 T2M 8,283 2 0 2 118 8,923 2 0 2 127 9,036 2 0 2 129 T3S 8,021 2 0 2 115 8,641 2 0 2 123 8,751 2 0 2 125 T3M 8,263 2 0 2 118 8,901 2 0 2 127 9,014 2 0 2 129 TV 8,083 2 0 2115 8,708 2 0 2 124 8,818 2 0 2 126 30 700 P2 70W TFTM 8,257 2 0 2.. 118 8,896 2 0 2 127 9,008 2 0 2 129 T5V5 8,588 3 0 0 123 9,252 3 0 0 132 9,369 3 0 0 134 TSS 8,595 3 0 1 123 9,259 3 0 1 132 9,376 3 0 1 134 T5M 8,573 3 0 2122 9,236 3 0 2 132 9,353 3 0 2 134 T5W 8,517 3 0 2.. 122 9,175 4 0 2 131 9,291 4 0 2 133 BLC 6,770 1 0 297 7,293 1 0 2 104 7,386 1 0 2 106 LCCO 5,038 1 0 2.. 72 5,427 1 0 2 78 5,496 1 0 2 79 RCCO 5,038 1 0 2. 72 5,427 1 0 2. 78 5,496 1 0 2 79 TIS 11,661 2 0 2114 12,562 3 0 3 123 12,721 3 0 3 125 US 11,648 2 0 2114 12,548 3 0 3 123 12,707 3 0 3 125 T2M 11,708 2 0 2.. 115 12,613 2 0 2 124 12,773 2 0 2 125 T3S 11,339 2 0 2 111 12,215 3 0 3 120 12,370 3 0 3 121 T3M 11,680 2 0 2 115 12,582 2 0 2 123 12,742 2 0 2 125 T4M 11,426 2 0 3112 12,309 2 0 3 121 12,465 2 0 3 122 30 1050 P3 102W TFTM 11,673 2 0 2.. 114 12,575 2 0 3 123 12,734 2 0 3 125 T5V5 12,140 3 0 1 119 13,078 3 0 1 128 13,244 3 0 1 130 US 12,150 3 0 1 119 13,089 3 0 1 128 13,254 3 0 1 130 T5M 12,119 4 0 2 119 13,056 4 0 2 128 13,221 4 0 2 130 T5W 12,040 4 0 3 118 12,970 4 0 3 127 13,134 4 0 3 129 BLC 9,570 1 0 294 10,310 1 0 2 101 10,440 1 0 2 102 LCCO 7,121 1 0 370 7,671 1 0 3 75 7,768 1 0 3 76 RCCO 7,121 1 0 370 7,671 1 0 3 7S 7,768 1 0 3 76 TIS 13,435 3 0 3.. 107 14,473 3 0 3 116 14,657 3 0 3 117 T2S 13,421 3 0 3 107 14,458 3 0 3 116 14,641 3 0 3 117 T2M 13,490 2 0 2 108 14,532 3 0 3 116 14,716 3 0 3 118 T35 13,064 3 0 3 105 14,074 3 0 3 113 14,252 3 0 3 114 T3M 13,457 2 0 2 108 14,497 2 0 2 116 14,681 2 0 2 117 TQ 13,165 2 0 3 105 14,182 2 0 3 113 14,362 2 0 3 115 30 1250 P4 125W TFTM 13,449 2 0 3 108 14,488 2 0 3 116 14,672 2 0 3 117 TSVS 13,987 4 0 1 112 15,068 4 0 1 121 15,259 4 0 1 122 TSS 13,999 3 0 1112 15,080 3 0 1 121 15,271 3 0 1 122 T5M 13,963 4 0 2.. 112 15,042 40 2 120 15,233 4 0 2 122 T5W 13,872 4 0 3 111 14,944 4 0 3 120 15,133 4 0 3 121 BLC 11,027 1 0 288 11,879 1 0 2 95 12,029 1 0 2 96 LCCO 8,205 1 0 366 8,839 1 0 3 71 8,951 1 0 3 72 RCCO 8,205 1 0 3.. 66 8,839 1 0 3 71 8,951 1 0 3 72 T15 14,679 3 0 3 106 15,814 3 0 3 115 16,014 3 0 3 116 RS 14,664 3 0 3 106 15,797 3 0 3 114 15,997 3 0 3 116 T2M 14,739 3 0 3 107 15,878 3 0 3 115 16,079 3 0 3 117 T35 14,274 3 0 3 103 15,377 3 0 3 111 15,572 3 0 3 113 T3M 14,704 2 0 3 107 15,840 3 0 3 115 16,040 3 0 3 116 TV 14,384 2 0 3 104 15,496 3 0 3 112 15,692 3 0 3 114 30 1400 P5 138W TFTM 14,695 2 0 3 106 15,830 3 0 3 115 16,030 3 0 3 116 T5V5 15,283 4 0 1 111 16,464 4 0 1 119 16,672 4 0 1 121 T55 15,295 3 0 1 111 16,477 4 0 1 119 16,686 4 0 1 121 TSM 15,257 4 0 2 111 16,435 4 0 2 119 16,644 4 0 2 121 TA 15,157 4 0 3110 16,328 4 0 3 118 16,534 4 0 3 120 BLC 12,048 1 0 287 12,979 1 0 2 94 13,143 1 0 2 95 LCCO 8,965 1 0 3. 65 9,657 1 0 3. 70 91780 1 0 3 71 RCCO 8,965 1 0 3.. 65 9,657 I 0 3. 70 9,780 1 0 3 71 VIVIVV One Litho IIIIII riaIIIIII Wt yrs, Georgia Phone 1-800-705-SERV (1378) llll DX1-LED pi 11pV Iii VIIII I'�uII O 2011-202 y Brands L n Inc. reserved. Rev0 1 Fag- 5 of 53 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR 6A� Lumen Output Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. 01 � ., ire. ,....... : i.. I u i Ill�lltlll III�I IIIIIIII II lu��u�u�lu�ufi a hlli���i���i�hi� kdl��aiihhi 1611ii��i`i a �fl IIIIIIIIIIIIII iJ„�,�,I��� V�111J1�Km1k� IIIIIIIIIIIIII�,,iKiYi7�1N� V�111J1�Kv �1 �� Illlllll,nf�„�I,l� Nff IIIIIIIIIIIII, f K,I��K�„��w��'�'�' IIIIIIIIIIIIII,„Ydf1K�� Illlllllllllh,,f��'�'� IIIIIIIIIIIIIII,aIINNIIN� N V�111,�'�il f 1111111111114, ��'i�,�� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIJ�' 1I1111K)U� ,K���� IIIIIIIIIIIIII�,�'�'�'�'� 1I11111m'��I,�KJ�f T15 17,654 3 0 3 108 19,018 3 0 3117 19,259 3 0 3 118 T2S 17,635 3 0 3 108 18,998 3 0 3 117 19238 3 0 3 118 T2M 17,726 3 0 3 109 19,096 3 0 3 117 19,337 3 0 3 119 T3S 17,167 3 0 3 105 18,493 3 13 113 18,727 3 0 3 115 TA 17,683 3 0 3 108 19,049 3 0 3 117 19,290 3 0 3 118 T4M 17,299 3 0 3 106 18,635 3 0 4 114 18,871 3 0 4 116 40 1250 P6 163W TFTM 17,672 3 0 3 108 19,038 3 0 4 117 19,279 3 0 4 118 T5VS 18,379 4 0 1113 19,800 4 0 1 121 20,050 4 0 1 123 TSS 18,394 4 0 2.. 113 19,816 4 0 2 122 20,066 4 0 2 123 TSM 18,348 4 0 2113 19,766 4 0 2 121 20,016 4 0 2 123 T5W 18,228 S 0 3.. 112 19,636 5 0 3 120 19,885 5 0 3 122 BL( 14,489 20 2 89 15,609 2 0 3 96 15,806 2 0 3 97 LCCO 10,781 1 0 3 66 11,614 1 0 3. 71 11,761 2 0 3 72 RCCO 10,781 1 0 3 66 11,614 1 0 3 71 11,761 2 0 3 72 TIS 19,227 3 0 3 105 20,712 3 0 3 113 20,975 3 0 3 115 T2S 19,206 3 0 3 105 20,690 3 0 3 113 20,952 3 0 3 114 T2M 19,305 3 0 3 105 20,797 3 0 3 114 21,060 3 0 3 115 T35 18,696 3 0 3 102 20,141 3 0 3 110 20,396 3 0 4 111 TA 19,258 3 0 3 105 20,746 3 0 3 113 21,009 3 0 3 115 TV 18,840 3 0 4 103 20,296 3 0 4 111 20,553 3 0 4 112 40 1400 P7 183W TFTM 19,246 3 0 4 105 20,734 3 0 4 113 20,996 3 0 4 115 T5VS 20,017 4 0 1 109 21,564 4 0 1 118 21,837 4 0 1 119 T55 20,033 4 0 2109 21,581 4 0 2 118 21,854 4 0 2 119 T5M 19,983 4 0 2.. 109 21,527 5 0 3 118 21,799 5 0 3 119 TA 19,852 50 3 108 21,386 5 0 3 117 21,656 5 0 3 118 BL( 15,780 2 0 3. 86 16,999 2 0 3 93 17,214 2 0 3 94 LCCO 11,742 2 0 3 64 12,649 2 0 3. 69 12,809 2 0 3 70 RCCO 11,742 2 0 3.. 64 12,649 2 0 3 69 12,809 2 0 3 70 TIS 22,490 3 0 3109 24,228 3 0 3 117 24,535 3 0 3 119 T25 22,466 3 0 4109 24,202 3 0 4 117 24,509 3 0 4 118 T2M 22,582 3 0 3.. 109 24,327 3 0 3 118 24,635 3 0 3 119 US 21,870 3 0 4 106 23,560 3 0 4 114 23,858 3 0 4 115 T3M 22,527 3 0 4 109 24,268 3 0 4 117 24,575 3 0 4 119 TV 22,038 3 0 4 106 23,741 3 0 4 115 24,041 3 0 4 116 60 1050 P8 207W TFTM 22,513 3 0 4 109 24,253 3 0 4 117 24,560 3 0 4 119 T5VS 23,415 S 0 1 113 25,224 5 0 1 122 25,543 5 0 1 123 T55 23,434 4 0 2 113 25,244 4 0 2 122 25,564 4 0 2 123 T5M 23,374 S 0 3113 25,181 5 0 3 122 25,499 5 0 3 123 T5W 23,221 S 0 4112 25,016 5 0 4 121 25,332 5 0 4 122 BLC 18,458 2 0 389 19,885 2 0 3 96 20,136 2 0 3 97 LCCO 13,735 2 0 3.. 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 RCCO 13,735 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 T15 25,575 3 0 3106 27,551 3 0 3 114 27,900 3 0 3 116 US 2S,S48 3 0 4.. 106 27,522 3 0 4 114 27,871 3 0 4 116 T2M 25,680 3 0 3 107 27,664 3 0 3 115 28,014 3 0 3 116 T3S 24,870 3 0 4 103 26,791 3 0 4 111 27,130 3 0 4 113 T3M 25,617 3 0 4 106 27,597 3 0 4 115 27,946 3 0 4 116 T4M 25,061 3 0 4 104 26,997 3 0 4 112 27,339 3 0 4 113 60 1250 P9 241W TFTM 25,602 3 0 4 106 27,580 3 0 4 114 27,929 3 0 4 116 T5VS 26,626 5 0 1 110 28,684 5 0 1 119 29,047 5 0 1 121 T55 26,648 4 0 2 111 28,707 5 0 2 119 29,070 5 0 2 121 TSM 26,581 5 0 3 110 28,635 5 0 3 119 28,9975 0 3 120 T5W 26,406 5 0 4 110 28,447 5 0 4 118 28,807 5 0 4 120 BL( 20,990 2 0 3. 87 22,612 2 0 3. 94 22,898 2 0 3 95 LCCO 15,619 2 0 4. 65 16,825 2 0 4 70 17,038 2 0 4 71 RCCO 15,619 2 0 4. 65 16,825 2 0 4 70 17,038 2 0 4 71 pV� VM pull' V I Ill�llpll Villlll�imlll�� One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1 -800 -705 -SERV (7378) • ..IIII > v ccri DSX1-LED w eIIV LIIV I,Vi',uIIIII�y,Vl�,,ill, plllllll II�"�,,a' © 2011-2021 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev_ 07/19/21 VIII IIIIIU Page Sof 54 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR VIII° 2Vu VIVV VIIII'�lil�lll�llllllu!Ilillllli iiilllll��� One Lithonia Way •Conyers, Georgia 30012 •Phone: 1 -800 -705 -SERV (1378) • r+r IIII i > i ; ccr-i DSX1-LED w �iIIIV LIIV I�i VIIIIW,VI�.,ululVlI IIIIII II�"�,,a' © 2011-2021 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev_ 07/19/21 �IIII IIII Page 7 of 55 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Lumen Output Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. III � I i/ � it u i Ill�lltlll III�I IIIIIIII II lu�lu�l��lu�ufl a hlli���i���i�hi� kdl��alihhi 1611ii��l`i a �111111111111111191„�,�fl�(i� VK11J1�Km1k� IIIIIIIIIIIIIII,,iKiYi7�1N� VK11J1�� �1 �� Illlllll,nf�„�I,l� Nff IIIIIIIIIIIII, f K,I��K�„��w��'�'�' IIIIIIIIIIIIII,„Ydf1K(i� Illlllllllllh,,f��'�'� IIIIIIIIIIIIIII,aIINNIIN� N VK11,�'�iI f 1111111111114, ��'i�,�� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIJ�' 1I1111K)U� ,K(iKK� IIIIIIIIIIIIIII,�'�'�'�'� 1I11111m'�II,�KJ�f T15 13,042 3 0 3123 14,050 3 0 3 133 14,228 3 0 3 134 T2S 12,967 4 0 4.. 122 13,969 4 0 4 132 14,146 4 0 4 133..... T2M 13,201 3 0 3 125 14,221 3 0 3 134 14,401 3 0 3136 T3S 12,766 4 0 4 120 13,752 4 0 4 130 13,926 4 0 4 131 TA 13,193 4 0 4 124 14,213 4 0 4 134 14,393 4 0 4 136 T4M 12,944 4 0 4... 122 13,945 4 0 4 132 14,121 4 0 4 133 60 530 1`10 106W TFTM 13,279 4 0 4 125 14,305 4 0 4 135 14,486 4 0 4 137 T5VS 13,372 30 1 126 14,405 4 0 1 136 14,588 4 0 1 138 US 13,260 3 0 1 125 14,284 3 0 1 135 14,465 3 0 1 136 TSM 13,256 4 0 2 125 14,281 4 0 2 135 14,462 4 0 2 136 T5W 13,137 4 0 3 124 14,153 4 0 3 134 14,332 4 0 3 135 BL( 10,906 30 3 103 11,749 3 0 3 111 11,898 3 0 3 112 LCCO 7,789 1 0 3 73 8,391 1 0 3. 79 8,497 1 0 3 80 RCCO 7,779 4 0 4 73 8,380 4 0 4 79 8,486 4 0 4 80 TIS 16,SS6 3 0 3 121 17,835 3 0 3 130 18,061 4 0 4 132 T2S 16,461 4 0 4 120 17,733 4 0 4 129 17,957 4 0 4 131 T2M 16,758 4 0 4 122 18,053 4 0 4 132 18,281 4 0 4 133 T35 16,205 4 0 4118 17,457 4 0 4 127 17,678 4 0 4 129 T3M 16,748 4 0 4.. 122 18,042 4 0 4 132 18,271 4 0 4 133 TV 16,432 4 0 4 120 17,702 4 0 4 129 17,926 4 0 4 131..... 60 700 P11 137W TFTM 16,857 4 0 4 123 18,159 4 0 4 133 18,389 4 0 4 134 T5VS 16,975 4 0 1 124 18,287 4 0 1 133 18,518 4 0 1 135 T55 16,832 4 0 1 123 18,133 4 0 2 132 18,362 4 0 2 134 T5M 16,828 40 2 123 18,128 4 0 2 132 18,358 4 0 2 134 TA 16,677 4 0 3 122 17,966 5 0 3 131 18,193 5 0 3 133 BL( 13,845 30 3 101 14,915 3 0 3 109 15,103 3 0 3 110 LCCO 9,888 1 0 3. 72 10,652 2 0 3. 78 10,787 2 0 3 79 RCCO 9,875 4 0 4 72 10,638 4 0 4 78 10,773 4 0 4 79 TIS 22,996 4 0 4 111 24,773 4 0 4 120 25,087 4 0 4 121 T25 22,864 4 0 4110 24,631 5 0 5 119 24,943 5 0 5 120 T2M 23,277 4 0 4.. 112 25,075 4 0 4 121 25,393 4 0 4 123 US 22,509 4 0 4 109 24,248 5 0 5 117 24,555 5 0 5 119 T3M 23,263 4 0 4 112 25,061 4 0 4 121 25,378 4 0 4 123 T4M 22,824 S 0 5 110 24,588 5 0 S 119 24,899 5 0 5 120 60 1050 P12 207W TFTM 23,414 5 0 5 113 25,223 5 0 5 122 25,543 5 0 5 123 T5VS 23,579 5 0 1 114 25,401 5 0 1 123 25,722 5 0 1 124 T55 23,380 4 0 2113 25,187 4 0 2 122 25,506 4 0 2 123 TSM 23,374 5 0 3.. 113 25,181 5 0 3 122 25,499 5 0 3 123 T5W 23,165 S 0 4 112 24,955 5 0 4 121 25,271 5 0 4 122 BLC 19,231 4 0 493 20,717 4 0 4 100 20,979 4 0 4 101 LCCO 13,734 2 0 3.. 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 RCCO 13,716 4 0 4. 66 14,776 4 0 4 71 14,963 4 0 4 72 T1S 25,400 4 0 4.. 110 27,363 4 0 4 118 27,709 4 0 4 120 T2S 25,254 S 0 5 109 27,205 5 0 S 118 27,550 S 0 5 119 T2M 25,710 4 0 4111 27,696 4 0 4 120 28,047 4 0 4 121 T3S 24,862 5 0 5.. 108 26,783 5 0 5 116 27,122 S 0 5 117 T3M 25,695 5 0 5 111 27,680 5 0 5 120 28,031 5 0 5 121 TQ 25,210 5 0 5109 27,158 5 0 5 118 27,502 5 0 5 119 60 1250 P13 231W TFTM 25,861 5 0 5.. 112 27,860 5 0 5 121 28,212 5 0 5 122 T5VS 26,043 5 0 1113 28,056 5 0 1 121 28,411 5 0 1 123 T55 25,824 4 0 2112 27,819 5 0 2 120 28,172 5 0 2 122 T5M 25,818 5 0 3.. 112 27,813 5 0 3 120 28,165 5 0 3 122 T5W 25,586 5 0 4 111 27,563 5 0 4 119 27,912 5 0 4 121 BL( 21,241 4 0 4 92 22,882 4 0 4 99 23,172 4 0 4 100 LCCO 15,170 2 0 4. 66 16,342 2 0 4 71 16,549 2 0 4 72 RCCO 15,150 5 0 5 66 16,321 5 0 5 71 16,527 5 0 5 72 VIII° 2Vu VIVV VIIII'�lil�lll�llllllu!Ilillllli iiilllll��� One Lithonia Way •Conyers, Georgia 30012 •Phone: 1 -800 -705 -SERV (1378) • r+r IIII i > i ; ccr-i DSX1-LED w �iIIIV LIIV I�i VIIIIW,VI�.,ululVlI IIIIII II�"�,,a' © 2011-2021 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev_ 07/19/21 �IIII IIII Page 7 of 55 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The sleek design of the D -Series Size 1 reflects the embedded high performance LED technology. It is ideal for many commercial and municipal applications, such as parking lots, plazas, campuses, and streetscapes. CONSTRUCTION Single -piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance and future light engine upgrades. The LED drivers are mounted in direct contact with the casting to promote low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). Low EPA (1.01 ft') for optimized pole wind loading. FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc -infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi -stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in both textured and non -textured finishes. OPTICS Precision -molded proprietary acrylic lenses are engineered for superior area lighting distribution, uniformity, and pole spacing. Light engines are available in standard 3000 K, 4000 K and 5000 K (70 CRI) configurations. The D -Series Size 1 has zero uplight and qualifies as a Nighttime FriendlyTI product, meaning it is consistent with the LEED° and Green Globe STI criteria for eliminating wasteful upl fight. ELECTRICAL Light engine configurations consist of high -efficacy LEDs mounted to metal - core circuit boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (up to L85/100,000 hours at 25'C). Class 1 electronic drivers are designed to have a power factor >905,,, THD <20%, and an expected life of 100,000 hours with <1 failure rate. Easily serviceable 10kV surge protection device meets a minimum Category C Low operation (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). STANDARD CONTROLS The DSX1 LED area luminaire has a number of control options. DSX Size 1, comes standard with 0-10V dimming drivers. Dusk to dawn controls can be utilized via optional NEMAtwist-lock photocell receptacles. Integrated motion sensors with on -board photocells feature field -adjustable programing and are suitable for mounting heights up to 30 feet. nLIGHT AIR CONTROLS The DSX1 LED area luminaire is also available with nLightO AIR for the ultimate in wireless control. This powerful controls platform provides out-of-the-box basic motion sensing and photocontrol functionality and is suitable for mounting heights up to 40 feet. Once commissioned using a smartphone and the easy-to- use CLAIRITY app, nLight AIR equipped luminaries can be grouped, resulting in motion sensor and photocell group response without the need for additional equipment. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over -ride can be achieved when used with the nLight Eclypse. Additional information about nLight Air can be found here. INSTALLATION Included mounting block and integral arm facilitate quick and easy installation. Stainless steel bolts fasten the mounting block securely to poles and walls, enabling the D -Series Size 1 to withstand up to a 3.0 G vibration load rating per ANSI C136.31. The D -Series Size 1 utilizes the AERIST"' series pole drilling pattern (template 48). NEMA photocontrol receptacle are also available. LISTINGS UL listed to meet U.S. and Canadian standards. UL Listed for wet locations. Light engines are IP66 rated; luminaire is IP65 rated. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. U.S. Patent No. D672,492 S. International patent pending. DesignLights Consortium@ (DLC) Premium qualified product and DLC qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC Premium qualified or DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at my d � (ii li<i I,, _ q 011 to confirm which versions are qualified. International Darl<-Sky Association (IDA) Fixture Seal of Approval (FSA) is available for all products on this page utilizing 3000K color temperature only. BUY AMERICAN Product with the BAA option is assembled in the USA and meets the Buy America(n) government procurement requirements under FAR, DFARS and DOT. Please refer to r.,r / Dr.r IMbi n&, oii /1',my < rnr i(:eir for additional information. WARRANTY 5 -year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: nv. <ii yhi i [ /rup'o I i., oinw,..,ri >Ixork k'i1,1° rind of diiI )I r Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1 -800 -705 -SERV (1378) • �wilh )ii �,.ccr_i DSX1-LED "�� �ill��� Lllp�i'. VIIIII'i���.,ululVl�illlll4!V' V�"'a' © 2011-2021 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev_ 07/19/21 VIII U Page 8 of 56 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR fA LlrWOJVIA LIOAMIMO(E) Ramw FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE—These specifications are for USA standards only. Square Straight Steel isageneral purpose light pole for up to 39 -foot mounting heights. This pole provides a robust yet cost effective option for mounting area lights and floodlights. CONSTRUCTION — Pole Shaft:The pole shaft is of uniform dimension and wall thickness and is made of weldable -grade, hot -rolled, commercial -quality steel tubing with a minimum yield of 55 KSI (11 -gauge, 0.120"), or 50 KSI (7 -gauge, 0.179"). Shaft is one-piece with a full-length longitudinal high -frequency electric resistanceweld. Uniformlysquare in cross- section with flat sides, small corner radii and excellent torsional qualities. Available shaft widths are 4", 5" and 6". Pole Top: Options include tenon top, drilled for side mount fixture, tenon with drilling (includes extra handhole) and open top. Side drilled and open top poles include a removable top cap. Handhole: A reinforced handhole with grounding provision is provided at 18" from the base on side A. Positioning the handhole lower may not be possible and requires engineering review; consult Tech Support -Outdoor for further information. Every handhole includes a cover and cover attachment hardware. The handhole has a nominal dimension of 2.5" x 5". Base Cover: A durable ABS plastic two-piece full base cover, finished to match the pole, is provided with each pole assembly. Additional base cover options are available upon request. Anchor Base/Bolts: Anchor base is fabricated from steel that meets ASTM A36 standards and can be altered to match existing foundations; consult factory for modifications. Anchor bolts are manufactured to ASTM F1554 Standards grade 55, (55 KSI minimum yield strength and tensile strength of 75-95 KSI). Top threaded portion (nominal 12") is hot -dipped galvanized per ASTM A-153. HARDWARE— All structural fasteners are high-strength galvanized carbon steel. All non-structural fasteners are galvanized or zinc -plated carbon steel or stainless steel. FINISH— Extra durable painted finish is coated with TGIC (Triglycidyl Isocyanurate) Polyester powder that meets 5A and 5B classifications of ASTM D3359. Powder -coat finishes include Dark Bronze, White, Black, and Natural Aluminum colors. Architectural Colors and Special Finishes are available by quote and include, but are not limited to Paint over Hot -dipped Galvanized, RAL Colors, Custom Calors and Extended Warranty Finishes. BUY AMERICAN — Product with the BAA option is assembled in the USA and meets the Buy America(n) government procurement requirements under FAR, DFARS and DOT. Please refer to www.acultybrands.com/ buy-americanforadditional information. INSTALLATION — Do not erect poles without having fixtures installed. Factory -supplied templates must be used when setting anchor bolts. Lithonia Lighting will not accept claim for incorrect anchorage placement due to failure to use Lithonia Lighting factory templates. If poles are stored outside, all protective wrapping must be removed immediately upon delivery to prevent finish damage. Lithonia Lighting is not responsible for the foundation design. WARRANTY -1 -year limited warranty. This is the only warranty provided and no other statements in this specification sheet create any warranty of any kind. All other express and implied warranties are disclaimed. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitvbrands.com/support/warranty/terms-and-conditions NOTE: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. Specifications subject to change without notice. Catalog Number Notes Type Anchor Base Poles 555 SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL hm OUTDOOR POLE -'57 SSS Square Straight Steel Poles I° n Ell N. V. " ° k NB N r IiIIIIIII1Villlu. Lead times will vary depending on options selected. Consult with your sales representative. Example: SSS 20 5C DM19 DDBXD SSS Serves Nominal fixture Nominal shaft base Mounting' Options Finish'* mounting height � size/wall thickness', SSS' 10'-39' 4C 4"11g(0.120") Tenon mounting AERIS'Suspend drill Shipped installed Superdurablepaint colors (for 1/2 ft 4G 4"7g(0.179") ntmg PT Open top (includes moua6 VD Vibration damper' DDBXD Dark bronze increments, add -6 to the pole height. SC 5" 11g (0.120") top cap) DM19AST_ 1at90° HAxy Horizontal arm bracket (1 fixture)',' DBLXD Black Ex: 20-6 equals SG 5"7g(0.179") T20 2-3/8" 0. D. (2" NPS) ; DM28AST_ 2at180° FDLxy Festoon outlet IesselectricalB10 DNAXD Natural aluminum 20ft6inJ6G 6"7g(0.179") T25 2-7/8"O.D.(2-1/2" DM29AST_ 2at90° CP1-12/xy 112" coupling' DWHXD White Seetechnical See technical NPS) DM39AST_ 3 at 90° T30 3-1/2" O.D. (3"NPS) CPL34/xy 3/4" coupling a DDBTXD Textured dark bronze information table information tableDM49AST_ 4at90° CPL1/xy 1" coupling' DBLBXD Textured black for com complete p for complete p T35 4" O.D. (3-1/2"NPS) OMERO' Suspend drill NPL12/xy 1/2"threaded nipple e DNATXD Textured natural ordering ordering KAC/KAD/KSE/KSF/KVR/KVF mountm 46 aluminum information.) information.) Drill mounting'NPL34/xy DM19MRT_ 1at90° 3/4" threaded nipple' DM19 1at90° NPL1/xy 1" threaded nipple' DWHGXD Textured white DM28MRT_ 2at1801 DM28 2at180°EHHxy Extra handhole'," Otherfinishes DM29MRT_ 2at901 DM28PL 2at180°with one iDM39MRT_ NEC NEC 410.30 compliant gasketed GALV Galvanized finish 3at90° side plugged handhole (Not UL Labeled) Architectural colors and special finishes DM29 2at90° DM49MRT_ 4at90° IC Interiorcoating1z Paint over Galvanized, RAL Colors, DM39 3at90° Custom Colors and Extended DM49 4at90° UAB Less anchor bolts Include when ( Warranty Finishes available. anchor bolts are not needed) CSX/DSX/RSX/AERIS'"'/OMERO'""/ HLA/KAXDrill mountina4 TP Tamper resistant handhole cover fasteners DM19AS 1 at 90° UL UL listed with label (Includes NEC DM28A5 2at180° compliant cover) DM29A5 2at90° BAA Bu y A merica (n) Act Com pl iant" DM39AS 3at90° DM49AS 4at90° RAD drill mounting°. DM19RAD 1at901 DM28RAD 2 at 180° DM29RAD 2at90° DM39RAD 3at90° DM49RAD 4at90° ESX Drill mounting" DM19ESX 1 at 901 DM28ESX 2 at 180° DM29ESX 2at90° DM39ESX 3090° DM49ESX 4at90° NOTES: 1. Handhole covers (HHQ, full base covers (FBQ and top caps (TC) shipped separately. No need to call out in nomenclature. For additional parts please order as replacements. 2. Wall thickness will be signified with a "C" (11 Gauge) ora "G" (7 -Gauge) in nomenclature. "C"- 0.120" 1"G"- 0.179". 3. PT open top poles indude top cap. When ordering tenon mounting and drill mounting for the same pole, follow this example: DM28/T20. The combination includes a required extra handhole. 4. Refer to the fixture spec sheet for the correct drilling template pattern and orientation compatibility. 5. All RAD drilling's require a minimum top O.D. off". 6. Insert "1" or "2" to designate fixture size; e.g. DM19AST2. 7. On 4" and 5" poles, VD cannot be installed if provisions (EHH, FDL, NPL, CPL) are located higherthan 2/3 of the pole's total height. Example. Pole height is 25ft, A provision cannot be placed above 16ft. Accessories: Order as separate catalognumber. PLDT20 Plugs for ESX drillings PL DT8 Plugs for DMxxAS drillings 8. Specify location and orientation when ordering option. For 'Y': Specify the height above the base of pole in feet or feet and inches; separate feet and inches with a'2. Example: 5ft = 5 and 20ft3m = 20-3 For "y": Specify orientation from h andhol e (A, B,C, D) Refer to the Handhole Orientation diagram below. Example: 1/2"coupling at 5' 8 ',orientation C= CPL 12/5-8C 9. Horizontal arm is 18" x 2-378" O.D. tenon standard, with radius curve providing 12" rise and 2-3/8" O.D. If ordering two horizontal arm at the same height, specify with HAxyy. Example: HA200.. 10. FDL does not come with GFCI outlet or handhole cover. These must be supplied by contractor or electrician. 11. Combination oftenon-top and drill mount includes extra handhole. EHH includes cover. 12. Provides enhanced corrosion resistance. 13. Use when mill certifications are required. 14. Finish must be specified. Additional colors available; see Architectural Colors brochure linked here (Form No. 794.3). POLE -SSS OUTDOOR: One Lithonia Way Conyers, GA 30012 Phone: 800 -705 -SERV (7378) www.lithonia.com ©1994-2022 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 04/04158 SSS Square Straight Steel Poles TECHNICAL INFORMATION - EPA (ftp) with 1.3 gust Bolt Bolt Base Baseplate Template Anchor bolt Anchor bolt size circle projection square Catalog Number Nominal Shaft Length (ft.)* Pole Shaft Size (Base in. xTop in.xft.) Wallthick (in) Gauge gOMPH Max. weight EPA (ft') with 1.3 gust 90MPH Max. weight 100 MPH Max. weight Bolt circle (in) Bolt size (in.xirsiz!) Approximate ship weight (Ibs.) SSS 10 4C 10 4.0 x 10.0 0.120" 11 30.6 765 23.8 595 18.9 473 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 75 SSS 12 4C 12 4.0 x 12.0 0.120" 11 24.4 610 18.8 470 14.8 370 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 90 SSS 14 4C 14 4.0 x 14.0 0.120" 11 19.9 498 15.1 378 11.7 293 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 100 SSS 16 4C 16 4.0 x 16.0 0.120" 11 15.9 398 11.8 295 8.9 223 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 115 SSS 18 4C 18 4.0 x 18.0 0.120" 11 12.6 315 9.2 230 6.7 168 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 125 SSS 20 4C 20 4.0 x 20.0 0.120" 11 9.6 240 6.7 167 4.5 150 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 140 SSS 20 4G 20 4.0 x 20.0 0.179" 7 14 350 11 275 8 200 8--9 3/4 x 30 x 3 198 SSS 20 SC 20 5.0 x 20.0 0.120" 11 17.7 443 12.7 343 9.4 235 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 185 SSS 20 SG 20 5.0 x 20.0 0.179" 7 28.1 703 21.4 535 16.2 405 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 265 SSS 25 4C 25 4.0 x 25.0 0.120" 11 4.8 150 2.6 100 1 50 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 170 SSS 25 4G 25 4.0 x 25.0 0.179" 7 10.8 270 7.7 188 5.4 135 8--9 3/4 x 30 x 3 245 SSS 25 SC 25 5.0 x 25.0 0.120" 11 9.8 245 6.3 157 3.7 150 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 225 SSS 2S SG 25 5.0 x 25.0 0.179" 7 18.5 463 13.3 333 9.5 238 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 360 SSS 30 4G 30 4.0 x 30.0 0.179" 7 6.7 168 4.4 110 2.6 65 8--9 3/4 x 30 x 3 295 SSS305C 30 5.0x30.0 0.120" 11 4.7 150 2 50 -- -- 10--12 1x36x4 265 SSS 30 5G 30 5.0 x 30.0 0.179" 7 10.7 267 6.7 167 3.9 100 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 380 SSS 30 6G 30 6.0 x 30.0 0.179" 7 19 475 13.2 330 9 225 11--13 1 x 36 x 4 520 SSS 355G 35 5.0x35.0 0.179" 7 5.9 150 2.5 100 -- -- 10--12 1x36x4 440 SSS 356G 35 6.0x35.0 0.179" 7 12.4 310 7.6 190 4.2 105 11--13 1x36x4 540 SSS 396G 39 6.0x39.0 0.179" 7 7.2 180 3 75 -- -- 11--13 1x36x4 605 NOTE:* EPA values are based ASCE 7-93 wind map. For 1/2 ft increments, add -6 to the pole height. Ex: 20-6 equals 20ft6in. BASE DETAIL POLE DATA Shaft base Bolt Bolt Base Baseplate Template Anchor bolt Anchor bolt size circle projection square thickness description and template description A B C description 4"C 8"-9" 3.25"-3.75" 8"-8.25" 0.75" ABTEMPLATEPJ50004 AB18-0 ABSSS-4C 4"G 8"-9" 3.38"-3.75" 8"-8.25" 0.875" ABTEMPLATEPJ50004 AB30-0 ABSSS-46 5" 10"-12" 3.5"-4" 11" 1" ABTEMPLATEPJ50010 AB36-0 ABSSS-5 6" 11"-13" 4"-4.50" 12.5" 1" ABTEMPLATE PJ50011 AB36-0 I N/A HANDHOLE ORIENTATION C D B Default DM19 is on side B. A Handhole IMPORTANT INSTALLATION NOTES: Do not erect poles without having fixtures installed. Factory -supplied templates must be used when setting anchor bolts. Lithonia Lighting will not accept claim for incorrect anchorage placement due to failure to use Lithonia Lighting factory templates. If poles are stored outside, all protective wrapping must be removed immediately upon delivery to prevent finish damage. Lithonia Lighting is not responsible for the foundation design. Bolt circles have +/-1/2" tolerance. CAUTION: These specifications are intended for general purposes only. Lithonia Lighting reserves the right to change material or design, without prior notice, in a continuing effort to upgrade its products. POLE -SSS OUTDOOR: One Lithonia Way Conyers, GA 30012 Phone: 800 -705 -SERV (7378) www.lithonia.com ©1994-2022 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 04/04159 AGI BRAND BOOK 915 E Rand Rd./RC0968 Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 12/19/2022 DRAWING REVISIONS DATE CHANGE 9/12/22 Updated site to proto 6 9/13/22 Updated cove lighting 12/19/22 Updated sIteplan N. ALBERT STREET SITEMAP No dev or LL restrictions as of 6/29/2022 QTY. CODE DESCRIPTION I Monumental] owed per st. frontage at 75 SF @ 12' OAH 3 WS-8FT 4x8 Wall Sign with a 5' setback from PL 1 ONS Open Sign Wall signs allowed I per wall at 10% of facade (NTE 150 SF) 1 PMRL Painted Mural MURAL 1 RD -1 Red Dog @ 1 CAN One Love Canopy Letters @ 2 DTMB DT Menuboard Secondary menu board NTE 20 SF @ 8'OAH 1 DTPS Pre Sell Board 2 DTSP Speaker Post @ I MON Monument No dev or LL restrictions as of 6/29/2022 YES NO I Monumental] owed per st. frontage at 75 SF @ 12' OAH with a 5' setback from PL Wall signs allowed I per wall at 10% of facade (NTE 150 SF) RED DOG MURAL Signs painted directly onto wall are prohibited/ Artwork not regulated by code Window signs NTE 50% of window area. Drive thru allowed 2 boards Primary NTE 40 SF @ 8'OAH, FLAGS r7 Secondary menu board NTE 20 SF @ 8'OAH OLH E - PAGE 2 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett 61 Code Check Form ❑ Stand Alone ❑ Multi -Tenant Customer Name: Raising Canes Parcel #: Zoning: B-3 Community Shopping Project Name : RC0968 Rand & Central Re -zoning Required/Recommended: Yes ❑ No ❑ Address: 915 E Rand Rd Jurisdiction: Village of Mount Prospect City: Mt Prospect State: IL Zip: 60056 Contact Name: Mark Rysavy Dev.name: Within PUD or CUP: Yes ❑ No❑ Phone: 847-818-5328 Master Sign Program (MSP) or Development Criteria: Yes ❑ No ❑ E -Mail: MRV,ayyCc'-Dmount.pros pn ct.org Ground Signs- Pylon (Pole) & Monument ❑ - N/A Are ground signs allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ If No, Tenant❑ Pylon/Pole ❑ Monument ❑ Minimum frontage to qualify: N/A Number of signs allowed: 1 /street frontage Distance to adjacent ground sign on same lot: 50' Surrounding Lot: N/A Maximum SF Allowed: 75 SF Formula for area calculation: N/A 0 Wind Load: Minimum setback: 5ft from PL Maximum Overall Height: 12 ft Visibility Triangle: 10 ft Berm Allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ How is height measured? from grade to top of sign. Top of berm does not count as grade. Required base covering: single pole signs must have skirt at least 1/2 width of sign face. How many faces count toward sign area ? 1 Illumination/ Lighting Restrictions: NTE 75footcandles when measured w/ standard light meter perpendicular to sign face from distance - narrowest dimension of sign Design restrictions for sign: 10 Items of Information max. EMC - Can there be animation? Yes ❑ No ❑ Does it have to be static? Yes ❑ No ❑ Can price be displayed? Yes ❑ No ❑ Color restrictions: none. Light Restrictions: NTE 0.3footcandles over ambient light. Recommended distance= sqft of sign x 100. Rate of change restrictions: 10 second hold time. Instant change. EMC must be at bottom of sign. EMC SF restrictions: 40% of freestanding sign area Placement or residential restrictions: N/A Notes: -No sign over 3' allowed in the visibility triangle •6 permanent items of information max on sign that has changeable copy. -No freestanding sign can over hang any part of structure, parking, or drive way isle. Wall Signs ❑ - N/A Number of signs allowed: 1 per wall- See notes SF based on: Street Frontage ❑ Building Frontage ❑ % ofwall area ❑ Aggregate building SF allowed: N/A Maximum Projection: 12" Lighting Restrictions: N E so deswna"me�u,edw se"ae,d gn ma e,"awe"d "e, os9"fay Maximum SF allowed per sign: 150 SF Formula for area calculation: 10% of wall attached to or 150 SF (less of 2) Maximum mounting height: N/A Max. Letter Height: N/A Max Logo Height: N/A Max. Sign Width: N/A Can sign project above the roof line? Yes ❑ No ❑ If yes, how much? Does this elevation require street frontage? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is area transferable to another elevation? Yes ❑ No ❑ How is sign measured? ❑ Box ❑ Geo Shape ❑ Other: Design restrictions? ❑ Raceway allowed Notes: One wall sign may be permitted on walls not facing a street, provided the wall is at least 50' from the nearest residential property line. The director may authorize additional wall signs for distinct uses within an establishment, provided there is a separate entrance from the exterior of the building Wall signs may be permitted which identify the rear entrance of an establishment provided such sign does not exceed 10 SF The area of a wall sign may be increased to 20% if the sign consists of only individual, outlined alphabetic, numeric, and/or symbolic characters without )ackground besides the building surface to which the sign is affixed NTE 150 SF Drive - Through's/ Address ❑ - N/A Menu boards allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ Quantity allowed? 2 Size restriction? 40 SF Height restriction? 8ft Are Pre -sell boards allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ Size restriction? 20 SF Height restriction? 8ft Are SED's required? Yes ❑ No ❑ Are menu awnings/ drive-thru canopy allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ Address Number required? Yes ❑ No ❑ SF: Illuminated? Yes ❑ No ❑ Restrictions? Notes Location: Prospect,Date: 07/06/2022 Site ID: 0.6. AGI PM: Briana Bennett Specialized Signs ❑ - N/A Painted Commercial mural allowed on walls? Yes ❑ No ❑ If no, allowed painted on substrate? Yes ❑ No ❑ If no, digital print? Yes ❑ No ❑ Quantity allowed? Size restriction? counts as a wall sign Count towards signs sq. ft.? Yes ❑ No ] Graphics without branding/ Pin -Mounted Art allowed on walls? Yes❑ No ❑ Can it be painted? Yes ❑ No ❑ Count towards signs sq.ft.? Yes ❑ No ❑ Quantity allowed? Size restriction? Subject to review Permanent banners allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ If no, allowed flat sign on substrate? Yes ❑ No ❑ Does copy count in SF? Yes ❑ No ❑ Quantity allowed? Size restriction? counts as a Wall sign Does it require a frame? Yes ❑ No ❑ Can Commercial flags be attached to building parapet? Yes ❑ No ❑ Restrictions on Qty. size/height/projection on roof? NTE Roof Interior illuminated window signs (Neon) allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ If no, are LED signs allowed? Yes[:] No ❑ Restrictions? NTE 50% of window area Is shield white LED lighting allowed around the building parapet / roof? Yes ❑ No ❑ Restrictions? Notes: -Signs painted directly onto the building are prohibited -Cove lighting not in code subject to review Directionals/ Regulatory Are directionals allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ Are permits required? Yes ❑ No ❑ Notes: 10% of sign area can be logo or Number ofsigns allowed? 1/drive; Interior site as approved buy director business name Maximum SF allowed: 10 SF Maximum overall height: Eft Directionals count towards allowed SF: Yes ❑ No ❑ Are interior lot directionals restricted? Yes ❑ No ❑ Name/ Logos allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ Temporary Signage Notes: -Vehicles: cannot be parked on public ROW, public property or private property to be visible from public way and attract attention to business. -Temp Signs allowed with no permit: 1/street frontage, 16 SF, 6ft OAH, removed 3 days after intended purpose NTE 1 yr. - Can be used for advertising or construction purposes. Can be used for advertising or construction purposes. Wall mounted only 5ft setback Temp signs allowed with permit: 1/street frontage, If w/in 100' of residential property, NTE 32sf, 8ft in height. More than 100' from residential: 50sf, 1 Oft in height. 14 items of display information max. Removed 3 days after intended purpose but NTE 1 year. Can be used for advertising or construction purposes. 5ft setback. D.07/06/2022 Site ID: 0.6. AGI PM: Briana Bennett Setback: SF: Height: Permit Required? Time Allowed: Banner: Yes] No❑ ❑ Feather Sign: Yes❑ No❑ ❑ Inflatable: Yes❑ No[—] ❑ Vehicle: Yes❑ No❑ ❑ Flag (Non-commercial) Yes❑ No❑ ❑ Ground Yard Sign (Commercial): Yes❑ No❑ ❑ String Lights: Yes F] No❑ Restrictions: ❑ Notes: -Vehicles: cannot be parked on public ROW, public property or private property to be visible from public way and attract attention to business. -Temp Signs allowed with no permit: 1/street frontage, 16 SF, 6ft OAH, removed 3 days after intended purpose NTE 1 yr. - Can be used for advertising or construction purposes. Can be used for advertising or construction purposes. Wall mounted only 5ft setback Temp signs allowed with permit: 1/street frontage, If w/in 100' of residential property, NTE 32sf, 8ft in height. More than 100' from residential: 50sf, 1 Oft in height. 14 items of display information max. Removed 3 days after intended purpose but NTE 1 year. Can be used for advertising or construction purposes. 5ft setback. D.07/06/2022 Site ID: 0.6. AGI PM: Briana Bennett Max # allowed?: Max SF: Preferred mounting method (no building yet): Other restrictions? Max Height?: Setbacks?: Are fence wraps allowed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Max SF: Max Height: Other restrictions? Construction Banner Max # allowed?: Max SF: Preferred mounting method: Other restrictions?: Notes: Construction Sign Timeframe allowed? Logo/Copy Restrictions? Indirect Illumination Allowed? Construction Fence Wrap Timeframe allowed? Logo/Copy Restrictions? Max Height: Setbacks?: Now Hiring Banner Construction Fence Wrap Now Hiring Banner(s) Time frame allowed? Logo/Copy Restrictions?: Indirect Illumination Allowed? Location: Prospect,Date: 07/06/2022 J,r/,j�ri/ Site ID: 0.6. AGI PM: Briana Bennett Now Hiring Banner �Ibft CIO At, at, IMNYWI"'M MW Awa N, MV'ati //IgA6Tw �6 MiUb;91b", V� IMP UUwt�UrM tw��� o�yiiiiim tl� � � � % , , wxV lu w. w�rx¢� f Max Height: Setbacks?: Now Hiring Banner Construction Fence Wrap Now Hiring Banner(s) Time frame allowed? Logo/Copy Restrictions?: Indirect Illumination Allowed? Location: Prospect,Date: 07/06/2022 J,r/,j�ri/ Site ID: 0.6. AGI PM: Briana Bennett Now Hiring Banner Online ❑ Review Board: Yes ❑ No ❑ Contact: Building Department Phone Number: 847-870-5640 building mountprospect.org Sealed Engineering ❑ Additional Professional Seals ❑ freestanding Documents Required (Banner): Site Plan ❑ Banner Details ❑ Number of Document Copies (Banner): Document Size: N/A ❑ In Color? Cost of Permit (Sign): $75/Sign Cost of Permit (Banner): Length of time to secure permit: 2 weeks Other permit costs / fees: $25 review fee When does the time frame permitted start (Banner)? From time of permit approval ❑ Time the banner is placed ❑ Other ❑ Current IBC used by municipality: 2021 Any code to reference: Building code ❑ Electrical Code ❑ Energy code ❑ If electrical permit is required for ONLY the hook up of the sign, is a licensed electrician required to come in person? Yes ❑ No ❑ Are permits required to be obtained in person? If not, what is the process: https://www.citizenserve.com/Portal/?installationid=252 How long are permits good for: 6 months Notes: Property owner signature required on application All signs on one application/permit 1 pdf of all drawings Variance Procedures Are variances allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ Likelihood of a variance being approved: poor % Approved: # Approved last year: Variance can be applied for by: Mail ❑ Authorized Agent ❑ Business ❑ Contractors ❑ Signature required on application: Owner ❑ Agent ❑ Lawyer ❑ Must attend variance hearing: Owner ❑ Agent ❑ Lawyer ❑ Documents required: Site Plan ❑ Elevations ❑ Sign Details ❑ Sealed Engineering ❑ Addit. Professional Seals ❑ Document Color: Color ❑ B/W ❑ Quantity Required: Document size: Length of time to secure variance: 60-90 days for entire property, less if just sign Cost of variance: $250 Can variances be granted during the site plan approval process? Yes ❑ No If yes, what board & is it different from the standard variance process? Apply for signs during variation process for property Notes Apply for additional signage during variation process for property. Board will not approved painted wall signs. They are VERY strict on signs, usually approved with a major project approval, not alone. i❑,v/ J �Up D.07/06/2022 Site ID: 0.6. AGI PM: Briana Bennett Permit Requirements Permits can be applied for by: Mail ❑ Authorized Agent ❑ In Person ❑ License Required: Business ❑ Contractors ❑ Signature Required on Application: Owner ❑ Agent ❑ Designer ❑ Documents Required (Sign): Site Plan ❑ Elevations ❑ Sign Details ❑ Number of Document Copies: 1 1 1 Online ❑ Review Board: Yes ❑ No ❑ Contact: Building Department Phone Number: 847-870-5640 building mountprospect.org Sealed Engineering ❑ Additional Professional Seals ❑ freestanding Documents Required (Banner): Site Plan ❑ Banner Details ❑ Number of Document Copies (Banner): Document Size: N/A ❑ In Color? Cost of Permit (Sign): $75/Sign Cost of Permit (Banner): Length of time to secure permit: 2 weeks Other permit costs / fees: $25 review fee When does the time frame permitted start (Banner)? From time of permit approval ❑ Time the banner is placed ❑ Other ❑ Current IBC used by municipality: 2021 Any code to reference: Building code ❑ Electrical Code ❑ Energy code ❑ If electrical permit is required for ONLY the hook up of the sign, is a licensed electrician required to come in person? Yes ❑ No ❑ Are permits required to be obtained in person? If not, what is the process: https://www.citizenserve.com/Portal/?installationid=252 How long are permits good for: 6 months Notes: Property owner signature required on application All signs on one application/permit 1 pdf of all drawings Variance Procedures Are variances allowed? Yes ❑ No ❑ Likelihood of a variance being approved: poor % Approved: # Approved last year: Variance can be applied for by: Mail ❑ Authorized Agent ❑ Business ❑ Contractors ❑ Signature required on application: Owner ❑ Agent ❑ Lawyer ❑ Must attend variance hearing: Owner ❑ Agent ❑ Lawyer ❑ Documents required: Site Plan ❑ Elevations ❑ Sign Details ❑ Sealed Engineering ❑ Addit. Professional Seals ❑ Document Color: Color ❑ B/W ❑ Quantity Required: Document size: Length of time to secure variance: 60-90 days for entire property, less if just sign Cost of variance: $250 Can variances be granted during the site plan approval process? Yes ❑ No If yes, what board & is it different from the standard variance process? Apply for signs during variation process for property Notes Apply for additional signage during variation process for property. Board will not approved painted wall signs. They are VERY strict on signs, usually approved with a major project approval, not alone. i❑,v/ J �Up D.07/06/2022 Site ID: 0.6. AGI PM: Briana Bennett ELEVATIONS COVE LIGHTING QTY. CODE DESCRIPTION SUBJECT TO BEIM . v- 3 WS-8FT 4x8 Wall Sign 1 ONS Open Sign Painted Mural 1 RD -1 Red Dog _ i 1 CAN One Love Canopy Letters 2 DTMB DT Menuboard ti \ 1 DTPS Pre Sell Board - - - 2 DTSP Speaker Post 1 MON Monument 0T WEST/FRONT ELEVATION 59'-0" � COVE LIGHTING SUBJECT TO REVIEW io IS \ \ — NORTH/DRIVE THRU ELEVATION ON SUBS TR.AT _ SUBJECT TGARIEVIEW 57'-4" Scale: 3/32"=1' ` - PAGE 7 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 (9-c La Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett - 66 ELEVATIONS COVE LIGHTING QTY. CODE DESCRIPTION SU=BJECT TO RE VSE ti v 7 ' �1 3 WS-8FT 4x8 Wall Sign 7j 1 ONS Open Sign 1 PMRL Painted Mural 1 RD -1 Red Dog ® 1-F. 1 CAN One Love Canopy Letters 2 DTMB DT Menuboard ti 1 DTPS Pre Sell Board 2 DTSP Speaker Post F 1 MON Monument EAST/REAR ELEVATION 59'-0" � REQUIRES VARIANCE� COVE LIGHTING SUBJECT TO 4E VIEW 10'-3 3/8" fllln' t YTEnrOR SIGN i ON SUBSTRATE SOUTH/SIDE ENTRY ELEVATION SUBJECT TO REYEW 57'-4" Scale: 3/32"=1' _ PAGE 8 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 (9-Cpr-.-m Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett - 67 101-01, 9'-7" 3 3" "1 91 -v I SIGN AREA 9'-3" CONCRETE PAD BLACK ALUMINUM CAP 6" ------- - - - - - - - MR-MMME' � A\0\00101 I I CUTSHEET 50 SF Acrylic Monument Ca) 10'OAH ALLOWED 1 SIGN PER STREET FRO T ALUMINUM CABINET ALUMINUM RETAINER, PAINTED RED ACRYLIC FACE W/ VINYL COPY, INTERNAL LED ILLUMINATION 915 —VINYL ADDRESS PROVIDED BY AGI BRICK BASE BY GC --- ,rl N TE 75 SF @ 72 f O"A H V-6" --f� 5=SE-TBACK FROM PL LOCATION TBD CONCRETE PAD BY AGI FOUNDATION PENDING FINAL ENGINEERING AGI RESPONSIBLE FOR FOUNDATION CONCRETE PAD Scale: 1/2"=l' Grade PAGE 9 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 th (9-C ... pm -m Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett AGI 68 150" THERMO FORMED CLEAR m o POLYCARBONATE FACE MECHANICALLY _ rn m N FASTENED TO CABINET W/ #10 X 3/4" LONG m S.S.P.H. SHEET METAL SCREWSt7a 12"O.C. AGILIGHT PR0215-65K-G3 WHITE LED MODULES Footqage C 60 WATT LED POWER SUPPLY W/ J -BOX & C DISCONNECT SWITCH X1/2" X 6' LONG LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT TO OWNER PROVIDED POWER SUPPLY 318" k 6" L GBOLT COLOR CAT ELECTRICAL DATA NOTES: 1.) INTERIOR OF CABINET TO BE 3M #3630-15 'YELLOW' PAINTED REFLECTIVE WHITE VOLTAGE 120 3M #3630-73 'RED' 1/4"0 WEEP HOLE AMPERAGE 1.8 3M #3630-53 'CARDINAL RED' W/ LIGHT SHIELD AS REQ'D SECTION PAGE 10 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 cxEe Fiacens Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett 69 NOR OF MOUNTING 't OF GRAPHIC Scale: 1 1/4"=1' NOTES: 1.) TRANSFORMER IS MOUNTED REMOTELY 2.) CONNECT 14 GA GROUND WIRE TO EACH MOUNTING FLANGE & TO GROUND LUG PROVIDED BY TRANSFORMER. -CONNECT TRANSFORMER GROUND TO SERVICE GROUND AT PANEL BOX ------------ — a to EXISTING TRANSFORMER BOX 2"x6" BLOCKING BETWEEN TRUSSES TRUSSES 5i'8" DRYWALL 3/8 ` B BOARD 1/4"x 6 ` LA.G BOLTS (TOTAL OF 4 PER FLANGE) 112" GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE & FILANGES W/MILL FINISH 112" X 112" ALUM. SQUARE TUBE FRAME W/MILL FINISH 3/16" CLEAR POLYCARBONATE CASE NEON YELLOW OVAL IS 13MM NEON VOLTARC 'CLEAR BRITE YELLOW' NEON LETTERS ARE 10MM VOLTEC'SNOW WHITE' 3 112" 1" 1112" 1" OFMOUNTING ((�� x HOLES T LIGHTING COMPONENTS LC -2-12-3-C (2,000-12,OOOV 30 MA) MOUNTED IN REMOVE TRANSFORMER BOX 9 PIPE FLANGE DETAIL 3/8" 0 THRU HOLE FOR 1/4" MOUNTING HARDWARE THREADED HOLE FOR 112" 0 GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE 1/4" GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE FLANGE CUTSHEET ONS (H) INTERIOR SIGN RIRL LENGTH TO BE IIERIFIED ITE 50 OR TOTAL WINDOW AREA ELECTRICAL TO PASS THRU MOUNTING TUBE TO ACCESS REMOTE POWER IN ATTIC TECNOLUX SILIFLEX GTO 15 NEON YELLOW SWOOPS ARE 13MM NEON VOLTARC 'CLEAR BRITE YELLOW' GTO WIRE NEON LETTERS ARE 10MM VOLTEC'SNOW WHITE' GRAB IT TUBE SUPPORTS ARE POP RIVETEDTO BACK OF POLYCARBONATE CASE 1/2" WIDE VELCRO BLOW UP DETAIL DOOR IS SECURED W/(2) #5 S.S.P.H. 1 SHEET METAL SCREWS 1112" CONTINUOUS PIANO HINDGE IS POP RIVETED TO POLYCARBONATE BOTTOM & MECHANICALLY j FASTENED TO POLYCARBONATE BACKER & ALUM. TUBE I+ FRAME 21 #6 S.S.P. H. SHEET METAL SCREWS V — — — _ (3) STRIPS OF 112" WIDE BLACK VELCRO TO CLOSE POLYCARBONATE DOOR �?a TUBE FRAME -DOOR IS SECURED W/ (2) #6 S.S.P.H. SHEET METAL SCREWS Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett 41/2" SECTION VIEW ELECTRICAL DATA VOLTAGE 1Z0 AMPERAGE 2.1 PAGE 11 70 91-0.1 15'-6" CUTSHEET PMRL (0915) ON SUBSTRATE ARTWORK NOT IN C w"'DE SBJEECT TO REVIEW CANNOT PAiNTMECTLY ON 1 112 X 3/4" X 1/8" RETAINER 1/8" ALUM. BACKER -BY OTHERS 5/16" 0 HOLE TO ACCOMMODATE LAG SCREW WITH FLAT WASHER 1/4" 0 X 2 3/4" S.S.H.H. TAPCON 5/16" 0 HOLE EXISTING WALL SECTION @ FASTENER FOR ARTIST RENDERING USE ONLY MURAL PROVIDED BY OTHER VENDOR PAGE 12 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 (9-C ... pm -m Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett AGI 71 96" �a� -- — .090" ALUM. PANEL W/ DIGITAL PRINT THREADED -ROD MOUNT CLAMPING HANGER(McM CARR: 3006T52) —J J EXISTING 1"0 S. S. TUBE #12 X 1/2" LONG S.S. CAP SCREW — — — — — — — — — -- W/ LOCK WASHER, FLAT WASHER BLOW-UP DETAIL & ACORN NUT SIDE VIEW SgUare ootuge CUTSHEET Red Dog on Substrate ARTWORK NO T IN CODE SUBJECT TO REVIEW mjai 11L I m GALVANIZED 90° ELBOW •�J� �o GALVANIZED,11/2"0, 3/8"0 S.S. MOUNTING ANCHOR BY INSTALLER. �-PROVIDE LAG OR MASONRY ANCHOR +� SCHED 40, STEEL PIPE ±6" THIS IS A DIGITAL PRINT ON ALUMINUM SUBSTRATE AND RIGID. GALVANIZED, 5" OD THREADED FLANGE ±S'-73/16" SIDE ELEVATION 5'-2" -NO EXPOSED THREADS ALUMINUM SUBSTRATE EXTERIOR WALL Q OF MCUNTING PLATE 4 EXISTING WALL �o 3/8"0 S.S. MOUNTING ANCHOR BY INSTALLER. �-PROVIDE LAG OR MASONRY ANCHOR +� AS APPROPRIATE W/ WASHER PROVIDE W/ BOLT HEAD ONLY 1/4" STEEL PL WELDED TO MOUNTING PL & STEEL PIPE -NO EXPOSED THREADS 21/2 PIPE CAP - MCM PN 1 1/4" 0 SCHED 40 STEEL PIPE PAINT ENTIRE ASSEMBLY "MAP BLACK" 44605K108 OR W/ MATTE FINISH 1" SCH 40 STEEL PIPE EQUIVALENT PLAN VIEW PAGE 13 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 pm EN72 �m-m Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett ; ;, _ �\ C 0 F E FRONT ELEVATION SIGN SIZE A B C D E F SF OL -16 16" ±1'-10 9/16" ±3'-313/16" ±71/8" ±4'-4" ±8'-3 11.22 OL -18 18" 2'-0" ±3'-813/16" ±8" ±4'-101/2" ±9'-3 3/8" 14.75 OL -20 20" 2'-2"s ±4'-1 13/16" 1 ±815/16" 1 ±5'-5" ±10'-3 3/8" 17.57 OL -22 22" 2'-4" ±4'-6 3/4" ±9 13/16" ±5-11 1/2" ±11'-41/8" 21.31 CUTSHEET One Love 20" Canopy Letters REQUIRES VARIANCE /8" WHITE IMPACT MODIFIED tCRYLIC FACES ASCONNECT SWITCH ALUM. RACEWAY IS PAINTED MAP'BLACK' V BLACK JEWELITE ALUM. RETURNS PREFINISHED'BLACK' SUPPORT TUBES ARE PAINTED MAP'BLACK' ALUM. RACEWAY IS PAINTED MAP'BLACK' DISCONNECT SWITCH SIDE VIEW PAGE 14 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 73 (9-c Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett ; ;, _ 1'-61/2" (TYP. CORNER) 063" BRAKE FORMED ALUM. END CAP #8 S.S.P.H. SHEET METAL SCREW, TYP. (2) PIECE .063" BRAKE FORMED ALUM. COVE LIGHTING CABINET FABRICATED ALUM. CORNER PIECE 4" TYP. OF LED CUTSHEET Cove Lighting ILT WALL BUSTER FOR CYT IN CODE ELECTRICAL PASS THRU SUBJECT TO REVIEW LIQUID TITE CONDUIT TO OWNER PROVIDED POWER SUPPLY o TRANSFORMER BOX DISCONNECT SWITCH - LED i WITCH- LEDi BRAKE FORMED ALUM. SEAM COVER PAINTED TO MATCH COVE LIGHT COVE LIGHT SECTION COVE LIGHT SECTION (MAX 12'-0") OFSEAM COVER (MAX 12'-0") STRUCTURAL PLAN VIEW RUN A BEAD OF BLACK SILICONE CAULK ACROSS THE TOP OF COVE LIGHT COVER MCM #92470A207 S.S. PHILIPS HEAD OR EQUIVALENT D D J SECTION TOP OF WALL/TOP OF COVE LIGHT #8 S.S.H.H.SELF DRILLING SCREW, -(6) PER SECTION -BY INSTALLER IN FIELD BRAKE FORMED ALUM. COVE LIGHTING MOUNTING BRACKET ILT-1X1-W30-BLK LED -4 MODULES PER 1FT -MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO MOUNTING BRACKET CONT. BRAKE FORMED ALUM. SHIELD BRAKE FORMED ALUM. COVE LIGHTING COVER PLASTIC WALL BUSTER FOR LOW VOLTAGE WIRE PASS THRU 2" X 3/16" SPACER W/ 1/4"0 HARDWARE AS REQD. DISCONNECT SWITCH 1/2" LIQUID TITE CONDUIT TO OWNER PROVIDED POWER SUPPLY WEATHER PROOF TRANSFORMER BOX TO CONCEAL POWER SUPPLY LL a � r o M +I +I ±3'-5 1/8" OF ELECTRICAL OUT CE' ±1'-8 9/16" ±1'-8 9/16" FRONT ELEVATION 2" a0 1/4" FLAT CUT ALUM. LETTERS DRILLED & TAPPED TO CHANNEL W/ 116 P.H.S.S. SCREWS .090" ROUTED -AND BRAKE FORMED ALUM. Z. BRACKET FASTENED TO WALL W/ 410 PLASTIC WALL ANCHORS EXISTING TILE WALL SECTION VIEW @a LETTERS CUTSHEET Lemonade Sign INTERIOR SIGN FABRICATED ALUM. CHANNEL CABINET PAINTED MAP'GLOSS WHITE' ON FACE & RETURNS W/ ALUM. FACE TO HAVE SURFACE APPLIED DIGITAL PRINT W/ GLOSS OVERLAMINATE EXISTING CERAMIC TILE WALL ELECTRICAL OUT LOCATION GRAPHICS ARE TRANSLUCENT WHITE MOLDED SILICONE BACKED W/ #7328 WHITE POLY & VINYL INTERIOR ELEVATION PLACEMENT Scale: 1/8"=l' PAGE 16 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 75 (9-C Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett ; ;, _ 6'-10 7/8" T-10 9/16" 15/8" 2'-101/2" 15/8" 1'-10 9/16" 2 1/8" 1'-6 3/8" 2 1/ 1/8" 2'-6 1/4" 211 ' 2 1/8"1'-6 3/8" 2 1/8" 6'-10 7/8" 7'-21/8" CUTSHEET Drive Thru Menu Board ALL k �� 2 BOARDS PER LANE FABRICATED ALUM. CABINETS & SCREW HEADS ARE POWDER COATED TIGER DRYLAC 039180170 'BLACK' MENU DIVIDER BAR DOOR LOCK PRINTED MENU BOARD TRANSLITE (SUPPLIED BY RAISING CANES) DISCONNECT SWITCH FABRICATED ALUM. CLADDING BASE COVER i ESCUTCHEON IS POWDER COATED TIGER DRYLAC 039/80170 'BLACK' GRADE Sq-.a-e-ootaTe 6 7/8" 21/2"3" 3/4" 5112 T-3 1/4" PAGE 17 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 pm -m thm76 �m_u � Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett ; ;, _ CUTSHEET Pre Sell Board ECOND i }` Er .' BOARD N! 2 5F i 8' w' AH V-11 9/16" 71/4" 1'-5" V-81/4" FRONT ELEVATION Squa e Tootage FABRICATED ALUM. CABINET IS POWDER COATED TIGER DRYLAC 039/80170'BLACK' 3/16" FABRICATED ALUM. HINGE -MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO MENUBOARD W/ S.S. POP RIVETS DISCONNECT SWITCH FABRICATED ALUM. CLADDING BASE COVER AND ESCUTCHEON ARE POWDER COATED TIGER DRYLAC 039/80170 'BLACK' EXPECTED GRADE 3 15/16" V-3 1/4" SIDE VIEW PAGE 18 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 pm -m D�m_ �� Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett ; ;, _ CUTSHEET Speaker Post 11/ "" 31/8" M M M MICROPHONE PERFORATIONS M ROUTED IN FACE DO M N N SPEAKER PERFORATIONS ROUTED IN FACE FABRICATED ALUM. CABINET IS POWDER COATED TIGER DRYLAC 039/80170 'BLACK' FRONT ELEVATION SIDE VIEW ` - PAGE 19 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 pm mg�u -m Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett , ,, , , - 78 SURROUNDING SITE PHOTOS " - PAGE 20 Location: Mt. Prospect, IL Date: 07/06/2022 79 (9-C Site ID: RC0968 AGI PM: Briana Bennett ; ;, _ MEMORANDUM To: Chuck Lindelof, P.E. Village of Mount Prospect From: Thomas J. Szafranski, PE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: 12/21/2022 Re: Raising Cane's 915 E. Rand a Dunt Prospect, IL 60056 Introduction Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., serves as the engineering consultant for Raising Cane's. They are proposing to construct a new restaurant at 915 E. Rand Road in Mount Prospect, IL. The sitework includes demolition, grading, storm sewer, watermain, sanitary sewer, and paving installation across the 1.40 -acre site. The site stormwater management practices will be designed to meet the Village of Mount Prospect, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District and Cook County ordinances. Existing Conditions The site currently consists of a Century Tile store, with associated parking, landscaping, and utilities. The site is bound by commercial development to the northwest, E. Rand Road to the northeast, Mount Prospect Road to the east, Central Road to the south, and N. Albert Street to the west. As shown in the attached Existing Impervious Area Exhibit, the existing impervious area is 1.40 ac. Runoff from the site is conveyed to both Albert Road and E. Rand Road via sheet flow. There is currently no detention provided on this site. The National Wetlands Inventory Map enclosed shows that wetlands are not present in the project area. The FEMA Firmette Map enclosed shows the site within Zone X. Proposed ii n The proposed development will include a restaurant with associated parking, landscaping, and utilities. As shown in the attached Proposed Impervious Area Exhibit, the proposed impervious area is 0.91 acres. Storm inlets and sewer throughout the site will convey runoff to an underground basin located within the parking lot south and west of the building. The storm sewer will convey runoff for, and up to, the 100 -year event. The underground basin will outfall at the storm structure at the northeast corner of the site, proposed under IDOT's "Plans for Proposed Federal Aid Highway". 80 The proposed site improvements consist of 0.91 acres of impervious area. The MWRD WMO requires one inch of stormwater runoff from all impervious surfaces of the development to be treated using volume control practices. The volume control required for this site is calculated below. Volume Control Required = 1 in * 1 f t * 0.91 acres = 0.08 ac -ft 12 in The nomograph method was utilized to determine the required detention. The adjusted curve number for the site is 84.59. Per Lower Des Plaines River Watershed, the discharge allowance for developments in the area is 0.20 cfs/ac. With a site area of 1.40 ac, the allowable release rate for the site is 0.28 cfs. The detention required for this site is 0.521 ac -ft. The WMO calculation spreadsheets are included as an attachment. The required volume control and detention will be achieved within the underground detention system. The underground system provides a total of 0.70 ac -ft. The StormTrap Stage Storage Breakdown is included as an attachment. • National Wetlands Inventory Map • FEMA Firmette • NRCS Soils Map • USGS Topographic Map • Existing Impervious Area Exhibit • Proposed Impervious Area Exhibit • MWRD WMO Calculations • StormTrap Stage Storage Breakdown 81 Wetlands December 15, 2022 This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the Wetlands base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Other 17-1 Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Pond Riverine National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) 82 This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 87055'41"W 4204'13"N "I :b,UVU 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed October, 2020 Legend SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A-V- A99 SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth Zane AE, AO, AH, VE AR HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile zc ,e X wo so Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard _ x `Oo - jo, Area with educed Flood Risk due to Levee. See Area with Flood Risk due to Levee zc ,e NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard __ X Effective LOMRs OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard z.n_ GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer STRUCTURES I I I I I I I Levee, Dike, or Floodwall a zoz Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance ».s Water Surface Elevation 8 - - - Coastal Transect ,— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary — --- Coastal Transect Baseline OTHER Profile Baseline FEATURES Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available N No Digital Data Available MAP PANELS Unmapped The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 121612022 at 3:59 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data overtime. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for 3 regulatory purposes. 8 v 2J /j f§ co A ) e smw 4657s 4657a 4657%0 46575W 4657e 4657620 4657640 46576W ) B ) 4657+ 4657560 4657580 4657600 4657620 4657640 4657660 !z 4657s \9 eseW§ 0 z c §j �_ _ _ _0\ Cf) CD CD ) J \ S } \® > : % } ) \ % ; \ e \ 0 ± © ! \ (� » CD §E ze / \ \ e rD \ / } @z ( cnrb � § J ), ( k�( 2J /j f§ co A ) e smw 4657s 4657a 4657%0 46575W 4657e 4657620 4657640 46576W ) B ) 4657+ 4657560 4657580 4657600 4657620 4657640 4657660 MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest (AOI) Soils C/D Soil Rating Polygons 0 A 0 A/D ED B ® B/D Q C 0 C/D D 0 Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A Rails A/D Interstate Highways B ,F US Routes B/D C Major Roads C/D Local Roads D OF Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points 13 A 13 A/D ® B ® B/D Hydrologic Soil Group—Cook County, Illinois MAP INFORMATION C The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. C/D D Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. ® Not rated or not available Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil Water Features line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of Streams and Canals contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Transportation Rails Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Interstate Highways measurements. ,F US Routes Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Background projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Aerial Photography IN Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Cook County, Illinois Survey Area Data: Version 16, Aug 31, 2022 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 7, 2020—Sep 20, 2020 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/15/2022 85 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Cook County, Illinois Hydrologic Soil Group Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified tJSl)A Natural Resources liiim Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/15/2022 Page 3 of 4 :: Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8058 Orthents, clayey, undulating D 1.8 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 1.8 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified tJSl)A Natural Resources liiim Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/15/2022 Page 3 of 4 :: Hydrologic Soil Group—Cook County, Illinois Tie-break Rule: Higher LJJSl)A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/15/2022 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 87 MCUSGS 1.1- IlUIRT-L"�lEll LTHI IT11111 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS QUADRANGLE SURVEY R W;o . .... U__, XILE 1 2-0 .... ....... .......... ...ARUNGTON HEIGHTS, IL . . ... ... 88 FOR REVIEW ONLY Kimley)))Horn RR JOB NO. 168418037 IMPERVIOUS AREA EXHIBIT all DATE 12/21/2022 Belvue CAUTION!! You Di J08 NO. DDD DZD,z3 EXH. SHEET NO. cm 00 1 �V LAND COVER LEGEND - V!OUB AREA IREUSD77 AREA AREA=61 SE (1.40 AC) PERVIOUS AREA PR—TYRE ESUE RETE Toa RAISING CANE'S AREA =1D SE 0.D0 Act RESTAURANT 915 E. RAND ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, IF 66056 PROTOTYPE 6E -V -AV STORE#RC968 z �q in a�S Uy -= U° FOR REVIEW ONLY Kimley)))Horn RR JOB NO. 168418037 IMPERVIOUS AREA EXHIBIT all DATE 12/21/2022 Belvue CAUTION!! You Di J08 NO. DDD DZD,z3 EXH. SHEET NO. cm 00 E. RAND ROAD I I N. ALBERT STREET FOR REVIEW ONLY oPo Kimley)))Horn KR Jog NO. 168418037 IMPERVIOUS AREA EXHIBIT all DATE 12/21/2022 Belvue CAUTION!! You Di JOB NO. o �sz o,z3 EXH . SHEET NO. — FARAP oc SCALE 11 FET ao _ LAND COVER LEGEND - AREA -! 9,E0 BE AREA-39,8046F�O.BI AG)E ( PE IS9EME ii un oR RAISING CANES * A- 0 PERVIOUS AREA 4Re, ei,swsF(o.4s Ac) RESTAURANT % e. j OSA RANDROAD MOUNTNT PROSPECT, IL 69056 PROTOTYPE BE -V -AV STORE#RC968 'p9 a _ z -U vLLv Al FOR REVIEW ONLY oPo Kimley)))Horn KR Jog NO. 168418037 IMPERVIOUS AREA EXHIBIT all DATE 12/21/2022 Belvue CAUTION!! You Di JOB NO. o �sz o,z3 EXH . SHEET NO. COMPOSITE RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER (CN) PROJECT: Raisine Cane's #968 PERMIT NUMBER: LOCATION: 915 E. Rand Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 TYPE OF AREA (SELECT WITH DROP-DOWN) X DETAINED AREA UNRESTRICTED AREA UPSTREAM AREA CONDITION (SELECT WITH DROP-DOWN) PROPOSED CONDITION RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATE: 12/21/2022 MAJOR STORMWATER SYSTEM OTHER: EXISTING CONDITION Surface Description Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) CN Area (acres) Product (CN)(Area) Impervious Area D 98 0.91 89.18 Pervious Area D 80 0.49 39.20 COMPOSITE RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER Composite CN = Total Product 128.38 Total Area 1.40 TOTALS: 1.40 128.38 Composite CN = 91.70 4/7/2022 91 ADJUSTED COMPOSITE RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER KNAD ) PROJECT: Raising Cane's #968 PERMIT NUMBER: LOCATION: 915 E. Rand Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 DATE: 12/21/2022 DEVELOPMENT INFORMTION 1. Area Detained, A 2. Total Impervious Area 3. Composite CN 4. Volume Control Storage Provided, VCP S. Depth of Rainfall, P acres acres ac -ft inches RUNOFF VOLUME (NRCS EQUATIONS) 6. Maximum Retention, S S = 1000CN — 10 7. Runoff Depth, Q D QD = (P — 0.2S)2(p + 0.85) 1 8. Runoff Volume, VR VR = QDA 1270 VOLUME CONTROL STORAGE inches inches ac -ft 9. Volume Control Storage Required, VCR 0.076 ac -ft 10. Additional Volume Control Storage Provided 0.024 ac -ft ADJUSTED RUNOFF VOLUME 11. Adjusted Runoff Volume, VADJ VADJ = VR — VCP 12. Adjusted Runoff Depth, QADJ 13. Adjusted Maximum Retention, SAW ac -ft inches inches ADJUSTED COMPOSITE RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 14. Adjusted Runoff Curve Number, CNADJ 84.59 4/7/2022 92 NOMOGRAPH: BULLETIN 75 RAINFALL DATA PROJECT: Raising Cane's #968 PERMIT NUMBER: LOCATION: 915 E. Rand Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 DATE: 12/21/2022 DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION 1. Detained Area 2. Curve Number 3. Actual Release Rate acres cfs REQUIRED DETENTION VOLUME 4. Required Detention Volume 0.521 ac -ft NOMOGRAPH 0.800 0.700 U 0.600 U M a E 0.500 2 0 c 0 0.400 c a a 0.300 0.200 0.100 NOMOGRAPH: BULLETIN 75 0.00 cfs/ac 0.05 cfs/ac 0.10 cfs/ac 0.15 cfs/ac 0.20 cfs/ac 0.25 cfs/ac 0.30 cfs/ac 0.000 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Curve Number 4/7/2022 93 December 15, 2022 Page 1 of 1 RAISING CANE'S - MOUNT PROSPECT, IL STAGE STORAGE BREAKDOWN 2'-9" SingleTrap TOTAL VOLUME: 30516.28 (C.F.) Juliette Stroesser Kimley-Horn & Associates 4201 Winfield Rd, Suite 600 Warrenville, IL 60555 Storage Type I QTY I Type II QTY I Type III QTY I Type IV QTY I Type V QTY I Type VII QTY I SPIV 1 QTY I SPIV 2 QTY I SPIV 3 QTY I SPIV 4 QTY SPIV 5 QTY I SPIV 6 QTY I SPIV 7 QTY I SPIV 8 QTY Total Units Stage Storage 0 1 66 1 0 1 37 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 106 Elevation System Invert 651.25 0.25 0.00 1,912.56 0.00 817.63 0.00 0.00 19.99 11.41 12.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,774.21 651.50 0.50 0.00 3,825.12 0.00 1,635.27 0.00 0.00 39.98 22.83 25.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,548.41 651.75 0.75 0.00 5,737.68 0.00 2,452.90 0.00 0.00 59.97 34.24 37.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,322.62 652.00 1.00 0.00 7,650.24 0.00 3,270.53 0.00 0.00 79.96 45.66 50.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,096.83 652.25 1.25 0.00 9,562.80 0.00 4,088.16 0.00 0.00 99.95 57.07 63.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,871.04 652.50 1.50 0.00 11,475.36 0.00 4,905.80 0.00 0.00 119.94 68.49 75.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,645.24 652.75 1.75 0.00 13,387.92 0.00 5,723.43 0.00 0.00 139.93 79.90 88.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,419.45 653.00 2.00 0.00 15,300.48 0.00 6,541.06 0.00 0.00 159.92 91.32 100.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,193.66 653.25 2.25 0.00 17,213.04 0.00 7,358.69 0.00 0.00 179.91 102.73 113.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,967.87 653.50 2.50 0.00 19,125.60 0.00 8,176.33 0.00 0.00 199.90 114.14 126.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,742.07 653.75 2.75 0.00 21,038.16 0.00 8,993.96 0.00 0.00 219.89 125.56 138.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 30,516.28 654.00 3.00 0.00 22,950.72 0.00 9,811.59 0.00 0.00 239.88 136.97 151.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 654.25 3.25 0.00 24,863.28 0.00 10,629.23 0.00 0.00 259.87 148.39 163.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 654.50 3.50 0.001 26,775.84 0.00 11,446.861 0.00 0.00 279.86 159.80 176.55 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 654.75 3.75 0.001 28,688.40 0.00 12,264.49 0.00 0.00 299.85 171.22 189.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 655.00 4.00 0.00 30,600.96 0.00 13,082.12 0.00 0.00 319.83 182.63 201.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 655.25 4.25 0.00 32,513.52 0.00 13,899.76 0.00 0.00 339.82 194.05 214.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 655.50 4.50 0.00 34,426.08 0.00 14,717.39 0.00 0.00 359.81 205.46 226.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 655.75 4.75 0.00 36,338.64 0.00 15,535.02 0.00 0.00 379.80 216.87 239.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 656.00 5.00 0.00 38,251.20 0.00 16,352.65 0.00 0.00 399.79 228.29 252.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 656.25 5.25 0.00 40,163.76 0.00 17,170.29 0.00 0.00 419.781 239.70 264.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 656.50 5.50 0.00 42,076.32 0.00 17,987.921 0.00 0.00 439.77 251.12 277.43 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 N/A 656.75 5.75 0.00 43,988.88 0.00 18,805.55 0.00 0.00 459.76 262.53 290.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 657.00 6.00 0.00 45,901.44 0.00 19,623.19 0.00 0.00 479.75 273.95 302.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 657.25 6.25 0.00 47,814.00 0.00 20,440.82 0.00 0.00 499.74 285.36 315.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 657.50 6.50 0.00 49,726.56 0.00 21,258.45 0.00 0.00 519.73 296.78 327.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 657.75 6.75 0.00 51,639.12 0.00 22,076.08 0.00 0.00 539.72 308.19 340.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 658.00 7.00 0.00 53,551.68 0.00 22,893.72 0.00 0.00 559.71 319.60 353.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 658.25 7.25 0.00 55,464.24 0.00 23,711.35 0.00 0.00 579.701 331.02 365.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 658.50 7.50 0.00 57,376.80 0.00 24,528.98 0.00 0.00 599.69 342.43 378.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 658.75 7.75 0.00 59,289.36 0.00 25,346.61 0.00 0.00 619.68 353.85 390.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 659.00 8.00 0.00 61,201.92 0.00 26,164.25 0.00 0.00 639.67 365.26 403.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 659.25 8.25 0.00 63,114.48 0.00 26,981.88 0.00 0.00 659.66 376.68 416.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 659.50 8.50 0.00 65,027.04 0.00 27,799.51 0.00 0.00 679.65 388.09 428.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 659.75 8.75 0.00 66,939.60 0.00 28,617.15 0.00 0.00 699.64 399.51 441.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 660.00 9.00 0.00 68,852.16 0.00 29,434.78 0.00 0.00 719.63 410.92 453.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 660.25 9.25 0.00 70,764.72 0.00 30,252.41 0.00 0.00 739.62 422.33 466.59 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 N/A 660.50 9.50 0.00 72,677.28 0.00 31,070.04 0.00 0.00 759.61 433.75 479.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 660.75 9.75 0.00 74,589.84 0.00 31,887.68 0.00 0.00 779.60 445.16 491.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 661.00 10.00 0.00 76,502.40 0.00 32,705.31 0.00 0.00 799.59 456.58 504.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 661.25 10.25 0.00 78,414.96 0.00 33,522.94 0.00 0.00 819.58 467.99 517.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 661.50 10.50 0.00 80,327.52 0.00 34,340.57 0.00 0.00 839.57 479.41 529.651 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 N/A 661.75 10.751 0.00 82,240.08 0.00 35,158.21 0.00 0.00 859.56 490.82 542.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 662.00 00 0.00 84,152.64 0.00 35,975.84 0.00 0.00 879.55 502.24 554.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 662.25 r-11,11,25 0.00 86,065.20 0.00 36,793.47 0.00 0.00 899.54 513.65 567.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 662.50 33 0.00 86,677.22 0.00 37,055.12 0.00 0.00 905.93 517.30 571.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 662.58 94 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development William J. Cooney, AICP Director of Communitv Development DATE: January 19, 2023 CASE NUMBER PZ -01-23 PUBLIC HEARING DATE January 26, 2023 Ann Choi Development Planner APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER LuAron Foster, Raising Canes Restaurants LLC / 915 E. Rand LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 915 E. Rand Road BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST The Petitioner, LuAron Foster of Raising Canes Restaurants LLC, is requesting conditional use approval to construct a drive-through associated with a fast-food restaurant and a variation to decrease the parking lot setback, on the behalf of Raising Canes Restaurants LLC at 915 E. Rand Road, also known as the Subject Property. The Village Zoning Code designates the Subject Property as B-3 Community Shopping. The proposal requires Village Board approval for the conditional use and the requested variation. The proposal meets the requirements and standards related to the Village Code, and staff is supportive of the requests. 2022 Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Map EXISTING ZONING B-3 Community Shopping EXISTING LAND USE/SITE IMPROVEMENTS Vacant commercial building SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE North: B-3 Community Shopping (Mount Prospect Plaza & Wal-Mart) East: B-3 Community Shopping (Mattress Firm) South: R -A Single -Family Residential West: R -A Single -Family Residential, R-3 Low -Density Residential STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVE APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS SIZE OF PROPERTY 1.40 Acres DENY 1 95 BACKGROUND/PROPERTY HISTORY The Subject Property was annexed in 1957. The Subject Property is currently improved with an existing, nearly 23,000 -square foot, commercial building that was built in 1978 and was occupied by Century Tile and Carpet from 1978 to 2021. The Subject Property currently provides six full access driveways along Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, Central Road and Albert Street. In 2017, the Village of Mount Prospect initiated a study of the three closely spaced intersections involving Rand Road, Central Road and Mount Prospect Road and the nearby Rand Road corridor due to the traffic issues that include blocked intersections and poor vehicle progression in this area. Based on this study, the Village has developed a plan to provide long- term enhancements to the area transportation system by improving the intersections, roadways, sidewalks, bike paths, driveways to businesses, lighting and drainage. The majority of these infrastructure improvements is expected to be completed by the end of 2023 with final completion in the spring of 2024. PROPOSAL The Petitioner proposes to demolish the existing commercial building and construct a dual -lane drive- through fast-food restaurant with related improvements. As proposed, the project requires conditional use approval for the drive-through lanes and a variation to the required parking lot setback. The various elements of the proposal are outlined below. Site Plan: The proposed site plan indicates that a 3,661 square foot building will be constructed on the Subject Property. The Subject Property is currently accessed from Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, Central Road and Albert Street. The proposed site layout proposes closing four of the six driveways —the center driveway on Rand Road, the single driveway on Mount Prospect Road, the single driveway on Central Road, and the southern driveway on Albert Street. The existing western access to Rand Road would remain in its existing location and be converted to right-in/right-out only. The Albert Street driveway would turn into a three-quarter access driveway (outbound right -turns onto Albert Street would be prohibited). The project proposes a dual -lane drive-through that has a counter -clockwise rotation around the proposed building. The proposed fast-food establishment can be accessed via the Rand Road driveway for southbound travelers. Vehicles will enter from Rand Road and proceed along the northwestern portion of the site, past a row of surface parking spaces located to the right. Vehicles will make two left turns after driving past the proposed building and a single row of parking spaces to enter the drive-through. The approach from the Albert Street driveway also has a counter -clockwise rotation where vehicles will make an immediate right to proceed directly into the drive-through lanes. After entering the drive-through lanes, orders will be placed from the menu boards, and patrons will proceed to the pickup window located along the northwest corner of the restaurant. After orders have been picked up, vehicles can make a right turn exiting the site, directly onto Rand Road (left -turns onto Rand Road would be prohibited) or make a left turn to proceed to the Albert Street driveway where vehicles are directed to make a left turn onto Albert Street (right -turns onto Albert Street would be prohibited) and proceed to Central Road. As currently designed, parking spaces would be provided along the west and south property lines and to the south of the proposed building. The parking lot setbacks along Albert Street, Central Road, Mount Prospect Road and along the west property lines will comply with the Village Code's minimum ten foot (10') parking lot; however, the parking lot setback along the Rand Road property line as shown would range from 6.7 feet to 9.3 feet. Variation approval is required to reduce the parking lot setback from 10' to 6.7' to 9.3 feet along the Rand Road frontage. 2 96 The project also proposes two freestanding canopies associated with the drive-through lanes. A freestanding drive-through canopy is located above the menu boards facing Mount Prospect Road and measures 32 feet by 42 feet with a total height of 11'-6" and a clearance height of 10 feet. The second freestanding canopy is located over the pick-up window facing Rand Road and measures 19 feet by 21 feet with an overall height of 14'-2" and a clearance height of 12'-8". A third canopy is attached to the building and is located over the outdoor dining patio to the west of the restaurant. Hours of Operation: The proposed hours of operation are as follows: Sunday — Thursday 9:30 AM to 1:30AM and Friday to Saturday from 9:30 AM to 3:30 AM. Other local suburban Raising Cane's restaurants operate from 10 AM to midnight daily. Staff supports restricting the hours of operation of the proposed drive- through to midnight daily to reduce disturbances to the adjacent residences and to remain consistent with the other local Raising Cane's restaurants. Parking: The Village Code requires twelve (12) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area excepting areas for storage, restrooms, and corridors used solely for accessing these areas. The proposed 3,661 square foot restaurant requires thirty (30) parking spaces. The Petitioner's proposal will exceed the required parking spaces by providing a total of thirty-three (33) parking spaces. Additionally, based on data collected at other nearby Raising Cane's locations in Schaumburg and Glen Ellyn, the peak occupancies observed ranged from 18 to 28 spaces between the two sites. Therefore, it is expected that the proposed site plan will provide sufficient parking at the Subject Property. Traffic: The Petitioner submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS). The study concluded that the study intersections are projected to adequately accommodate the proposed redevelopment. Traffic exiting Albert Street must travel southbound to Central Road via the three-quarter access driveway restricting right -turn movements and "No Right Turn" signage. Per the TIS, a review of the comparable local Raising Cane's facilities indicates that the proposed parking supply and drive-through stacking provided on-site will adequately accommodate proposed operations and spillback from parking or the drive-through is not expected on adjacent roadways. The Village Engineer has reviewed the traffic impact study and the main concern was the amount of time it would take a vehicle to turn onto Central Road from Albert Street. At the stop -sign controlled intersection of Central Road/Albert Street, the TIS indicates that under existing conditions, it would take a vehicle 24 seconds to turn onto Central Road from southbound Albert Street. The Future (2028) Build Levels of Service shows that the 24 seconds would increase to 95 seconds after the project is built and fully operational. The Petitioner modified their original site plan to address staff's concerns by incorporating a three-quarter access driveway to prohibit cars from making a right -turn onto Albert Street from the site. The Village will review the traffic impacts to the neighborhood within a six month time frame after the project is operational and if necessary, the Village will widen Albert Street to accommodate three lanes—two southbound lanes (one shared through/left-turn lane and one dedicated right -turn lane) and one northbound lane to improve the level of service at the intersection of Central Road and Albert Street. Drive -Through Stacking and Service Vehicle Staging: Per the Drive -Through Stacking & Service Vehicle Staging memo and Drive -Through Queuing Plan submitted by the Petitioner, the stacking plan allows for 27 cars within the designated drive-through lanes. An additional 9 cars can be accommodated to stack during the initial "honeymoon" period and would allow for a total of 36 cars in the drive-through stack before any 3 97 cars would back up into the main drive along the west side of the site. During this "honeymoon" period, a crewmember and/or drive-through directional sign can be placed along the site's western drive aisle to direct inbound drive-through customers into the designated temporarily extended drive-through lane that would be defined by traffic cones. Per the memo, any cars attempting to cut the line by traveling southeasterly along the northern parking lot drive aisle will be blocked from entering the drive-through by the lines of traffic cones which will direct them back to the main western drive. As stated in the memo, food delivery trucks will enter and exit the site via the Albert Street or Rand Road driveways. Service vehicles will stage in the western drive while the drivers unload their goods and will exit through the opposite driveway from where they entered since trucks will not have the ability to make a U-turn. Trash pickup trucks will enter from one of the two driveways, navigate southeasterly to access the trash enclosure located near the drive-through entry, and then exit through either of the two driveways. Trash Enclosure: The site plan indicates a trash enclosure will be located to the east of the building. The drawings show that the enclosure is 8'-4" in height and will be composed of metal and will accommodate two dumpsters. Detailed drawings will be required with the building permit submittal. Building Elevations: The attached elevations indicate the proposed building will be composed of brick, reclaimed metal panels, architectural panels, and perforated metal panels. As shown the building height would measure twenty feet six inches (20'-6") at its highest point and complies with the maximum height requirement of thirty-five feet (35') in the B-3 district. Signage: The attached sign package and building elevations illustrate the proposed signs for the Subject Property. With some minor revisions, signage shall be allowed as presented on the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects, and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI. The sign package illustrates a total of 4 wall signs, one along each of the building elevations including a painted mural sign (on substrate) on the drive-through elevation facing Rand Road. In addition to the four wall signs, the sign package illustrates one freestanding ground sign located at the Rand Road driveway and one secondary canopy sign. Each drive-through lane also includes one main menu board and one secondary menu board. In addition, the temporary sign (pictured with a dog in sunglasses) is a permanent fixture that may be changed without requiring a permit for the duration of that sign in that location on the building. No other temporary signage shall be allowed on this side of the building unless this sign is removed. Landscaping: A significant amount of new landscaping is being provided site wide and as the entire site is currently almost all impervious surfaces, the modifications to the site are a substantial improvement over the existing conditions. The proposed landscape plan indicates a continuous row of permanent peripheral screening (Sea Green Juniper shrubs) around the perimeter of the parking lot and drive aisles and a screening knee wall at the intersection of Mount Prospect Road and Rand Road to mitigate any headlight glare coming from the cars within the parking lot and drive-through lanes. Staff has requested that the Petitioner enhance the landscape concept for the large grassy area along the Central Road frontage. This area is large and is located at a prominent intersection, and there is an opportunity for a landscape feature along Central Road. There are some minor revisions that need to be included in the current landscape plan; however, staff is confident that appropriate landscaping can be achieved on the site. Lighting Plan: Per the photometric plan, seven (7) new parking lot lights will be installed. As shown, lot line foot-candle readings exceed the maximum brightness allowed along the southern property line (Albert 4 98 Street). Per the Village Code, the southern and eastern property lines abut 'other right-of-way', meaning foot-candle measurements cannot exceed 0.5 foot-candles at the lot line. The northern and southern property lines abut 'arterial right-of-way', meaning foot-candle measurements cannot exceed 2.0 foot- candles at the lot line. The western property line is adjacent to a B-3 zoned commercial lot, meaning foot- candle measurements cannot exceed 2.0 foot-candles at the lot line. Submittal of a photometric plan that complies with Village codes and regulations shall be required at time of building permit submittal. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Comprehensive Land Use Map's Future Land Use Map designates the Subject Property as Corridor Commercial which includes developments on predominantly large sites with stand-alone type commercial uses and auto -oriented commercial uses such as gas stations or drive-through establishments. Key characteristics of the district include providing a mix of uses that serve the needs of residents and attract visitors from the region, encouraging infill and redevelopment opportunities to provide a broader mix of uses. Corridor commercial uses are typically located in high visibility areas along major corridors, so vehicular site access should be well-defined and convenient, and minimize the impact on surrounding roadways. Lastly, corridor commercial uses encourages appropriate screening of buildings, parking areas and driveways with landscaping when abutting existing residential neighborhoods. The proposed development is located one of the most prominent intersections and gateways into the Village, is an auto - oriented commercial use with careful consideration given to minimize the traffic impacts to the surrounding neighborhoods, will serve as a local and regional attraction, is a redevelopment site, and will provide a substantial amount of landscape screening to reduce impacts to the nearby residents; therefore, the Petitioner's proposal is consistent with the long-range goals of the Comprehensive Plan. CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for conditional uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a conditional use. The following list is a summary of these findings: • The conditional use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; • The conditional use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and 0 The request is in compliance of the conditional use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances The Petitioner's request to construct a drive-through restaurant meets the standards for a conditional use. The drive-through lanes would be located on the south, east and northeast areas of the Subject Property as to not have a detrimental impact on the residential properties to the southwest. Per the Petitioner, the Raising Cane's drive-through will promote a safe environment for customers to place and pick up their orders. The proposed development is in close vicinity to other drive-through restaurants along Central Road (Burger King) and East Rand Road (Buona Beef) and will not impede the existing surrounding properties. The Petitioner has stated that the operations will be handled on site to avoid complications with other neighbors/ adjacent sites. Further, the Petitioner states that the property is served by all necessary utilities via public utility main lines on the adjacent roads. Finally, the Petitioner states the site layout is designed to maximize drive-through stacking on-site which will minimize traffic congestion in the public streets and the 5 99 double drive-through lanes will help minimize site congestion. Additionally, the Petitioner states that access to the site is being restricted to two locations instead of the existing six access points providing for safer traffic channelization on-site and reducing impacts to traffic on the surrounding roads. Staff is supportive of the Petitioner's conditional use request as the request meets the standards for a conditional use. The site has been redesigned to reduce impacts to the residential properties to the south and southwest. The proposal includes the closure of four of the six existing driveways located on Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, Central Road and Albert Street, to minimize impacts to the roadway network. Further, the Petitioner has worked with staff to redesign the Albert Street driveway to discourage vehicles from driving through the residential neighborhoods to the north. The proposed use complies with the Comprehensive Plan and will be constructed to Village Codes. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for a variation and finds that the standards for a variation have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's responses to the standards. The Subject Property is unique and a hardship exists due to the physical constraints of an irregular-shaped lot. Per the Petitioner, the irregular shape of the Subject Property offers minimal opportunity for alternative site layouts and creates a unique situation for the Raising Cane's development, setting it apart from other properties that are also zoned B-3 (Community Shopping). Based on the information submitted, the surrounding uses, and the proposed development's compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend conditional approval of the requested entitlements. The proposed project would replace a vacant parcel with a vibrant new restaurant along the Rand Road commercial corridor. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed project, as conditioned, will be desirable by replacing an underutilized site with a use found to be in high demand for Mount Prospect and the surrounding communities. Staff finds that the conditional use and variation requests meets the standards and that granting the conditional use and variation would be in the best interest of the Village. Based on these findings, staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motions: "To approve: 1. A conditional use to allow for dual drive-through lanes, including the construction of two freestanding canopies over the drive-through consisting of one drive-through canopy measuring ten feet in clearance height (10'-0") with a total area of one thousand three hundred forty-four square 0 100 feet (1,344 SF) and one pick-up window canopy measuring twelve feet eight inches in clearance height (12'-8") with a total area of three hundred ninety-nine square feet (399 SF), one three-foot tall knee wall along the Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road frontage, and the installation of signage as illustrated in the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI, subject to the following conditions: a. The hours of operation of the drive-through shall be restricted to 10 AM to midnight daily; b. The proposed temporary sign located on the south elevation may be changed without requiring a permit for the duration of the proposed temporary sign in that location on the building. No other temporary sign shall be allowed on the south elevation unless this sign is removed; c. The Petitioner shall address all comments included in the Village review letter dated January 19, 2023; 2. A variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten feet (10') to six and seven tenths feet (6.7') to nine and three tenths feet (9.3') along the Rand Road frontage, subject to the following conditions: a. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Kimley-Horn dated 01/13/2023; b. The Petitioner shall address all comments included in the Village review letter dated January 19, 2023; c. Submittal of landscape, irrigation, and photometric plans that comply with Village codes and regulations; d. Wayfinding signage and site signage shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division to ensure safe and efficient movement; e. Sidewalk across driveways must be poured separately from the aprons; f. The existing water service shall be disconnected at the main and a new tap will have to be made for the new service by means of a pressure connection; g. The trash enclosure will need to be covered; otherwise, the nearby drain is to be connected to the storm sewer system; h. On-site easements that will no longer be necessary shall be vacated; i. A permit from IDOT will be required for any work within the Rand Road and Central Road rights-of-way; j. Compliance with all applicable Village Code requirements, including, but not limited to, fire code, lighting regulations, landscaping regulations, sign code regulations, and building regulations." The Village Board's decision is final for this case. MINISTRATIVE CONT PLANS OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Zoning Request Application, Responses to Plat of Survey, Site Plan, etc.) (Supplemental Information, Public Standards, etc... Comments Received, etc...) I concur: Uy'`a 9- ", V. William J. Cooney, AICP Director of Community Development 7 101 RECEIVED INtwo" Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department D EC' 2 '7 2022 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Village Of Mt. Prospect Phone: (847) 818-5328 Commitratu — Zoning Request Application ......... ..... Official Use Only (To be completed by Village 11 0 Staff) Case Number: P&Z Date of Submission: Hearing Project Name/Address: OYMA,'15 / 61101 17A kAA k2,4 I. Subject Property Address(es): _915 E Rand Zoning District (s): Property Area (Sq,Ft. and/or Acreage): Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN(s): Ill. Zoning Request(s) (Check all that apply) Conditional Use: For Qftvt7th(u restaggint .. ............ ... ..... ...... Variation(s): To ❑ Zoning Map Amendment: "Rezone OF El Zoning Text Amendment: Section(s) El Other: IV. Applicant (all correspondence will be sent to the applicant) . . . . ......... ------ Name: _LuAron_EQster_____,__ Corporation: Address: City, State, ZIP Code: Plano, TX 75024-4274 . . ... .... ....... -_ . ......... . .............. Phone: -Q72-z693 Email: Interest in Property: (e.g. owner, buyer, developer, lessee a—rch–lie,ct e'-tc" ...... . ...... . . ..... FILE VIIJ AGE ('")F MT PIZ60"""P, r 102 V. Property Owner . ........... El Check if Same as Applicant Name: Corporation: 915 E Rand LLC Address: 226 N. Morgan Street Suite 300 City, State, ZIP Code: Chicago, IL 60607 Phone: Email: c.ilekis@vequity.com In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and id( all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. RSO T— LuAron Foster ..................... Applicant::::'off.:: .....Date: 12127122 7—"— . .................... . .. . . . . . — — — ---------- (Signature) LuAron Foster -a' , , '........... . . . ... ....... . ............ . ..... . . . . . . ........................................ .. (Print or Type Name) If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner: . . .......... ...... ... Date: 12/21 22 Christopher Hekis (Print or Type Name) - 103 AffidavitofOwnership COUNTY OF COOK STATE OF ILLINOIS I, bA)"5-fC�a? (AW---- (_ under oath, state that I am (print name) ❑ the sole owner of the property Wan owner of the property n authorized officer for the owner of the property commonly described as 915 E Rand Road, Mount Prospect, IL (PIN: 03-35-307-009-0000) (property address and PIN) and that such property is owned by 915 E Rand LLC (print name) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 day of �Aj gI Notary Public as of this date. Signature Olfldal Seat Notary Public Ward Info MY Comml�lon E Mtia 2025 104 Freedom Tale Corporation 2000 W ATt Certifier Dr., Ste C205 4loirman Walhaa. IL 60192 This document was prepared by: Christian T. Laden Huck Bouma, P.C. 1755 S. Naperville Road, Ste. 200 Wheaton, IL 60189 After recording mail to: John W. Morse, Esq. Patzik, Frank &Samotny Ltd. 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2740 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Mail Future Tax Bills To: 915 E Rand LLC c/o Vequity LLC 226 N. Morgan St., Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60607 Doc#. 2229245012 Fee: $98.00 Karen A. Yarbrough Cook County Clerk Date: 10/19/2022 10:03 AM Pg: 1 of 5 Dec ID 20221001664882 ST/CO Stamp 0-308-584-784 ST Tax $2,671.00 CO Tax $1,335.50 for Recorder's use 1/6 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED This SPECIAL. WARRANTY DEED, trade as of October, 2022 by SPIEWAK INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company and PARKS INV STMENT GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company ("Grantor'), to an in favor of 915 E Rand LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, having an address at c/o Vequity LLC, 226 N. Morgan St., Suite 300, Chicago Illinois 60607 ("Grantee"). WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/ 100 Dollars ($10.00), and other valuable consideration in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does REMISE, RELEASE, ALIEN AND CONVEY unto Grantee, and to its successors and assigns, FOREVER, all interest in and to the real estate situated in the County of Cook and State of Illinois known and described on Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, including ail improvements located thereon (collectively, the "Premises"), subject to those matters set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and trade a part hereof (the "Permitted Exceptions"). Together with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim or demand whatsoever, of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the Premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Premises as above described, with the appurtenances, onto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. And the Grantor, for itself, and its successors and assigns, does covenant, promise and agree, to and with the Grantee, its successors and assigns, that during the period that Grantor has owned title to the Property, it has not done or suffered to be done anything whereby the Premises hereby granted is, or may be, in any manner encumbered or charged, except for the Permitted Exceptions set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof; and that subject to such Permitted Exceptions, the Grantor will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the Premises against all persons lawfully claiming by, through or under the Grantor, but not otherwise. low=.�•-i�:�...:��:_;�.'..s:��"^"",'e�+.�.a:w-,".^..G.r.C� �►+ �� � [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)x*�*�r+� , & ViLI.ACE OF MOUNT PROSPECT It' ii cawrr: ,.ass,so Iii aEe L ESTar rr� �raF�sz rax bi:.w #1 I1Ei % roux: ,,aosao ?� .n „fE ��` i73-3r�307gQ�000C �AR.2?DOtc6.6g? � 4706-_Tbl-76i ►,1 52431 &f 105 2229245012 Page: 2 of 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused its name to be signed to these presents on the date first set forth herein. GRANTOR: SPIEWAK INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company By: Name: Phillip C. Sp ewak Title: Authorized Manag r STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ss. COUNTY OF COOK ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that Phillip C. Spiewak, as an Authorized Manager of SPIEWAK INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, personally known to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged he signed and delivered said instrument as his free and voluntary act, and as the free and voluntary act of such limited liability company, for the uses and purposes thereiptset forth. tA GIVEN UNDER my hand and Notarial Seal this 0 day of August, 2022. 2 Notary Public My Commission Expires: jj my Mme^"^ �QFFICIAL SEAL` DAWN ZIMMERMANN VOTARY PUBLIC STATE kLi1N0IS OMMI'S10N EXPiRES:Ei6 4 2229245012 Page: 3 of 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused its name to be signed to these presents on the date first set forth herein. GRANTOR: PARKS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company � 4 By: Name: Thomas B. Poczatek Title: Authorized Manager STATE OF ILLINOIS } } ss. COUNTY OF COOK } I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that Thomas B. Poczatek, as an Authorized Manager of PARKS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, personally known to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged he signed and delivered said instrument as his free and voluntary act, and as the free and voluntary act of such limited liability company, for the uses and purposes therein set forth. 3�X GIVEN UNDER my hand and Notarial Seal this I day of August, 2022. "'tt'qt 2Lj L -&n, L. Aj Notary Public My Commission Expires:4 OVA jL[0)A\'N*N cc CIAL $EALIMMERMANNILLINOIS C' E)(PIRES.It aION `11YA 2229245012 Page: 4 of 5 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY LOT 1 IN CENTURY RESUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF LOTS 2,3 AND ALL OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 2 IN FRANK SERAFINE'S THIRD ADDITION BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 1 I EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN (EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT I CONVEYED TO THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BY WARRANTY DEED DATED MARCH 3, 2022 AND RECORDED APRIL 12, 2022 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2210246018), ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PIN: 03-35-307-009-0000 Address: 915 E. Rand Rd., Mount Prospect, IL 60056 108 2229245012 Page: 5 of 5 EXHIBIT B PEMUTTED EXCEPTIONS A lien of real estate taxes and assessments not yet due and payable. 2. All matters disclosed on the ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey made by Schmitt Engineering dated March 1, 2021, Project File No. 200415. Covenants and restrictions contained in a deed from the Exchange National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee under Trust Number 5891 to the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania dated January 14, 1958 and filed January 29, 1958 as Document LR 1779415, relating to the use, construction, and location of buildings, etc., to be erected on the land. (Affects the East 100 feet of the land). 4. Easement for Sewer and Water purposes as disclosed by Deed from Mt. Prospect Thommean Corp. to Aledron Realty Company, Inc., filed September 1, 1959 as Document LR 1883269 over the following described land: The North 10 feet of the South 19 feet (Except the East 100 feet thereof) of Lot 4 of the underlying land. (Affects the North 10 feet of the South 19 feet of the West 35.69 feet of the East 135.69 feet of the land) Grant of Easement filed June 10, 1959 as Document LR 186612, made by LaSalle National Bank, as Trustee under the Trust Agreement dated December 12, 1958 and known as trust number 22297 to the Commonwealth Edison Company and the Illinois Bell Telephone Company, their successors and assigns, jointly and severally, the right, permission, and authority to construct, lay, maintain, relocate, renew and remove equipment consisting of wires, cables and other necessary electrical facilities, and to transmit and distribute by means or said equipment electricity to be used for heat, light, power, telephone and other purposes with right of access to the same for the maintenance thereof; in, upon and along the east five feet of the land of said Grantor described as the East 50 feet of Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Frank Serafine's Third Addition which is the East 50 feet of the underlying land. (Affects the East 5 feet of the Land) 6. Temporary Construction Easement in favor of the Village of Mount Prospect and its/their respective successors and assigns, to install, operate and maintain all equipment necessary for the purpose of serving the land and other property, together with the right of access to said equipment and the provisions relating thereto contained in the grant recorded April 12, 2022 as Document No. 2210246019, for particulars see document. 109 $0.00 By 02/01/2023 IF PAYING LATE, PLEASE PAY Taxing Districts 2021 Second Installment Property Tax Bill - Cook County Electronic Bill Property Index Number (PIN) Volume Code Tax Year (Payable In) Township Classification 03-35-307-009-0000 235 38020 2021 (2022) WHEELING 5-92 02/02/23 - 03/01/23 03/02/23 - 04/01/23 04/02/23 - 05/01/23 LATE INTEREST IS 1.5% PER $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 MONTH, BY STATE LAW 2021 Tax 2021 Rate 2021 % Pension 2020 Tax MISCELLANEOUS TAXES 2021 Total Tax Before Exemptions 178,138.95 Homeowner's Exemption .00 Northwest Mosq Abatement Dist Wheeling 189.20 0.011 0.11% 2021 State Equalizer X 3.0027 184.64 Metro Water Reclamation Dist of Chicago 6,570.35 0.382 3.69% 722.39 6,979.41 Mt Prospect Park District 10,612.31 0.617 5.96% 1,117.99 10,229.08 Miscellaneous Taxes Total 17,371.86 1.010 9.76% 17,393.13 SCHOOL TAXES Harper College Comm College 512 Palatine 7,860.34 0.457 4.41% 7,551.80 Township HS District 214 (Arlington Hts) 45,820.43 2.664 25.72% 842.79 43,981.37 Mount Prospect Public School District 57 67,715.85 3.937 38.01% 2,528.37 65,990.51 School Taxes Total 121,396.62 7.058 68.14% 117,523.68 MUNICIPALITY/TOWNSHIP TAXES Mount Prospect Spec Sery Area 5 0.00 0.000 0.00% 0.00 Mount Prospect Library Fund 11,128.31 0.647 6.25% 10,949.18 Village of Mount Prospect 18,145.85 1.055 10.19% 6,518.74 18,057.84 Town Wheeling Road Fund 258.00 0.015 0.14% 240.03 General Assistance Wheeling 137.60 0.008 0.08% 147.71 Town of Wheeling 705.19 0.041 0.40% 683.17 Municipality/Township Taxes Total 30,374.95 1.766 17.06% 30,077.93 COOK COUNTY TAXES Cook County Forest Preserve District 997.59 0.058 0.56% 34.39 1,070.91 Consolidated Elections 326.80 0.019 0.18% 0.00 County of Cook 4,179.56 0.243 2.34% 1,513.58 5,022.24 Cook County Public Safety 2,253.18 0.131 1.26% 2,437.25 Cook County Health Facilities 1,238.39 0.072 0.70% 904.74 Cook County Taxes Total 8,995.52 0.523 5.04% 9,435.14 (Do not pay these totals) 178,138.95 10.357 100.00% 174,429.88 2020 Assessed Value 572,813 2021 Total Tax Before Exemptions 178,138.95 Homeowner's Exemption .00 Senior Citizen Exemption .00 2021 Assessed Value 572,813 Senior Freeze Exemption .00 2021 State Equalizer X 3.0027 2021 Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) 2021 Total Tax After Exemptions 1,719,986 178,138.95 2021 Local Tax Rate X 10.357% First Installment 95,936.43 2021 Total Tax Before Exemptions Second Installment + 82,202.52 178,138.95 Total 2021 Tax (Payable in 2022) 178,138.95 915 E RAND LLC 915 E RAND RD 226 N MORGAN ST#300 MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 2566 CHICAGO IL 606071305 *** Please see 2021 Second Installment Payment Coupon next page *** 110 2021 Second Installment Property Tax Bill Cook County Payment Coupon Pursuant to Cook County Ordinance 07-0-68, if you are a mortgage lender, loan servicer, or agent of any entity within the meaning of 35 ILCS 200/20-12, you may not pay using a downloadable tax bill unless you pay the $5 duplicate bill fee. Cu r & INCI...IJIDE WIT H PAYMEN r 11M 11 _ T3LG Property Index Number (PIN) Volume $0.00 Cook county eBill 03-35-307-009-0000 235 By 02/01/2023 Click to pay online Amount Paid If paying later, refer to amounts above. Click to update Mailing Name/Address SN 0020210200 RTN 500001075 AN (see PIN) TC 008911 $ Internal use only 00202102001033530700900004008911200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 This is an Official Downloadable Tax Bill Payment Coupon. COOK COUNTY TREASURER Please process this coupon along with payment presented. PO BOX 805438 CHICAGO IL 60680-4116 111 03353070090000/0/21/F/0000000000/2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 1 IN CENTURY RESUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF LOTS 2, 3 AND ALL OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 2 IN FRANK SERAFINE'S THIRD ADDITION BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTH WEST* 1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID CENTURY - RESUBDIVISION REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ON DECEMBER 17, 1976, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2912036, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. EXCEPT THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN CENTURY-RESUBDVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN*, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1976 AS TORRENS DOCUMENT NO. 2912036 IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BEARINGS* AND DISTANCES BASED ON THE ILLINOIS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NAD 83 (2011 ADJUSTMENT) WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 0.99996302, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS*: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 (ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAND ROAD) BEING A 2172.46 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 176.60 FEET (THE CHORD BEARS SOUTH 54 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, 176.55 FEET): THENCE SOUTH 57 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, 60.3 FEET* ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT l TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD AS ACQUIRED BY THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PER CONDEMNATION CASE NO. 78 L 16042; THENCE SOUTH 38 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST, 25.28 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, 25.28 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 (ALSO BEING THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD AS PER TORRENS DOCUMENT NO. 3074014, RECORDED APRIL 23,1980): THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, 151.40 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, 32.04 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 (ALSO BEING THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD): THENCE NORTH 39 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 26.00 FEET TO A POINT 13.40 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST, 145.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE; THENCE NORTH 36 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST, 44.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE 6.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 57 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 41.63 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A POINT ON A 2178.46 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND BEING 6.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF 112 LOT 1; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND PARALLEL LINE 177.09 FEET (THE CHORD BEARS NORTH 54 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 47 SECONDS WEST, 177.04 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST 6.00 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 113 " Klmley)))Horn Face I December 21, 2022 Village of Mount Prospect 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: Raising Cane's C0968 915 E. . Road Mount Prospect, • To whom it may concern, A Conditional Use and Variation is being requested as part of the proposed development located at 915 E. Rand Road in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The following information has been provided to assist the Planning and Zoning Commission with their statement of findings in response to the matters listed in the Conditional Use and Variation checklists. The applicant is requesting a drive-thru as a conditional use. Additionally, the applicant is knowingly requesting one variation from the zoning regulations, which are listed below. Please notify us if any additional variations are triggered as you complete your review of the enclosed plans. Section 14.1704: All off street parking and loading areas within the B-3 district shall be set back a minimum of ten feet (10') from each property line. Required: 10' setback Provided: A minimum setback of 6.7' is provided along E. Rand Road. This is being requested as a result of incorporating several site planning requests from Village staff while also trying to maintain Raising Cane's standards that are needed for a functional site. We respectfully request this variance and believe it will have no negative impacts to the community since it abuts an existing intersection and commercial development. 114 r Conditional Use Standards: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare Response: The Raising Cane's drive-thru will promote a safe environment for customers to place and pick up their orders. The site design is oriented to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation for the public. 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located Response: The proposed development is in close vicinity to other drive-thru restaurants along Central Road (Burger King) and E. Rand Road (Buona). We're merely fitting in with current uses of the area. We will be upgrading the landscaping and beauty of our site for visual improvement. Our proposed use will allow for more convenience to the community. Our operations will be handled on site to avoid complications with other neighbors/ adjacent sites. I That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district Response: The proposed development is in close vicinity to other restaurants along Central Road (Burger King) and E. Rand Road (Buona). The proposed use will not impede the existing surrounding properties. 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided Response: The property is served by all necessary utilities via public utility main lines on the adjacent roads. This is evident by both the ALTA/TOPO survey as well as the existing operational Century Tile store that was previously developed on this property. The site provides direct access to E. Rand Road and N. Albert Street. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets Response: The site layout is designed to maximize drive-thru stacking on site which will minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Double drive-thru lanes are also utilized to help minimize site congestion. Additionally, access to the site is being restricted to just 2 locations instead of the existing 6 access points. This provides for safer traffic channelization onsite and reduces impacts to traffic on the surrounding roads. 115 Klmley)))Horn Face 3 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village Response: To the best of our knowledge, we are proposing to comply with all objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village, associated with our site. 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Response: To the best of our knowledge, we are proposing to comply with most zoning regulations associated with our site. The Conditional Uses being requested are for the drive-thru and outdoor dining aspects of this project. Variation Standards: Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations was to be applied Response: The irregular shape of this site offers minimal opportunity for alternative site layouts. Raising Cane's has explored alternatives to the parking/loading setback in an effort to meet Village Zoning Ordinance requirements, but a solution that meets all code requirements does not appear to exist. 2. The conditions upon which an application for a variation are based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other property within the same zoning classification Response: The irregular shape of this site creates a unique situation for the Raising Cane's development, setting it apart from other properties that are also zoned B-3 (Community Shopping). 3. The purpose of the variation is not based primarily upon a desire to increase financial gain Response: The purpose of the variation is solely due to being unable to find a site layout that meets all Village Zoning Ordinance requirements. A desire to increase financial gain is not the purpose to the variance requests listed above. K". r 4. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property Response: Difficultly in meeting Village Zoning Ordinance is derived from being restricted to how many requirements we can fit within the available space. Raising Cane's has worked diligently with staff to come up with a site plan that minimizes the number of areas that require a variance and limit Village Zoning Ordinance exceptions to areas that have a lesser impact. For example, the parking/loading setback is being met along N. Albert Road instead of E. Rand Road because N. Albert Road abuts residential properties. 5. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located Response: All operations will be handled on site to avoid complications with other neighbors and adjacent roadways. The proposed use will allow for more convenience to the community through quick, high quality meals, job opportunities, and corporate community involvement. 6. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood Response: The proposed Raising Cane's is along E. Rand Road and Central Road, which both include several other restaurant establishments. We are merely following suit with the similar redevelopments that have taken place nearby. We will be upgrading the landscaping and beauty of the site for visual improvement to the community. 7. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage or create drainage problems on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood Response: A knee wall is being proposed at the intersection of E. Rand Road and Mount Prospect Road to prevent any impacts of light from the drive-thru on oncoming traffic. The proposed Raising Cane's is designed to maximize drive-thru stacking on site, which will minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The proposed site will help stormwater management by increasing green space and providing detention. Sincerely, Tom Szafranski, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Phone: (331)481-7330 117 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY IIEGAL DES( RIM ]ON l ZI, I I I Z121 nn an fa-� A1111 A 11 GRAPHIC SCALE r17,1 I 111 1. � III TlAARI A, hIIMMACk 1' 1.1 GI NI) Il,". I/,' -11I S( HEDULE B NOIFS III 1 11 A 1 11 11 11 A I El IIII T11-111.1 III T11 1.1 1 1111 111 1111 -41 1 1111,Al II Ip �c r L IF _111 11 1 -1— ITH r1_1 �Alll T' TH! ". 'I"I III_ Al. III.I. I !, . _ "I �,RANIII I� rII 1� 2"ItIZ I`AX "T E All A.— 1. - -111 A,11�, ll-l"r .... ..... ....... is I II 11,01151 110111 E) HI 1111-A—r,I..IT A Ill. lI 11T 11ITT-1 All SURVEYOWSCER F11 WAHON TI ... .... . I""" ""A"' S Tl 11, IF I 1 1. Il III IlAT — 11 1� 8AA(l -Il — l A-110-4 1111 — I III Ill 111I I- I I I I rA I I 'I 11, �1 �1 'I I'11, 111 1111 All 1(1)cm , 1, 1 Al 11 �1� Illy A BBRF V IA I TUNS 611, S I A I EMI N1 PERF COMPASS SURVEYING LTD cxuwrrZ'IA I --------- ---- ----- — — — — — S( HEDULE B NOIFS III 1 11 A 1 11 11 11 A I El IIII T11-111.1 III T11 1.1 1 1111 111 1111 -41 1 1111,Al II Ip �c r L IF _111 11 1 -1— ITH r1_1 �Alll T' TH! ". 'I"I III_ Al. III.I. I !, . _ "I �,RANIII I� rII 1� 2"ItIZ I`AX "T E All A.— 1. - -111 A,11�, ll-l"r .... ..... ....... is I II 11,01151 110111 E) HI 1111-A—r,I..IT A Ill. lI 11T 11ITT-1 All SURVEYOWSCER F11 WAHON TI ... .... . I""" ""A"' S Tl 11, IF I 1 1. Il III IlAT — 11 1� 8AA(l -Il — l A-110-4 1111 — I III Ill 111I I- I I I I rA I I 'I 11, �1 �1 'I I'11, 111 1111 All 1(1)cm , 1, 1 Al 11 �1� Illy =— . . . . 611, S I A I EMI N1 118 =— . . . . 611, S I A I EMI N1 COMPASS SURVEYING LTD --------- ---- ----- — — — — — . .................................................. - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - -------- I'llIll-'11 111 111111 A11-1-1111-111-111 . .............. ........ 118 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE MIAIMC KA - AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ............................................ I a � a M , A� ,J t 14i ... s• ui 5 f r" StYE f3fNUaMAfYN..�r1 ` ++r 7;,\ "° rk tar `� 1 i � a' o °" nM J �1 .......... ..... .... CENTRAL =aa REAS- ---- EAS g1I4 .. I t ISDN( HMA2K1 aK BEwGiMMNe; .�.. V'i'd'.,arn \zntx rno.ucrF'\'2'z.av0e\22.o�w're ai ,a ra=o.nrvc COMPASSI'll IFY n, N<AN: IGmley*Horn -- -- O SU RVEYING LTD rv.�w,,.� � � ,,,, ..VIP ... "' a:o., .M . wox»roM _ __ __ __ _ _ ""Y,;... 6�.,�F �N„wWwa«�'",& • "� ".,, w• Ca11 ,«r�avo 119 r January 31, 2023 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: Raising Cane's i,8 915 E . Road Prospect,Mount 00 Dear Ms. Choi The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval for our Conditional Use and Parking Lot Setback Variance request (PZ -01-23) by a unanimous vote. Our request is scheduled to go before Village Board for the ordinance's first reading on February 71h, 2023. On behalf of LuAron Foster with Raising Cane's, we are requesting that the Village Board waive the second reading and that final action is taken at the February 7 1 meeting. We are anxious to start the project as soon as possible due to long lead times associated with permitting and construction material shortages. I appreciate your assistance in facilitating this request. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 331-481-7330 or tom.szafranski(cDkimley-horn.com. Sincerely, Tom Szafranski, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Phone: 331-481-7330 Email: tom.szafranski@kimley-horn.com 120 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -01-23 Hearing Date: January 26, 2023 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 915 E. Rand Road PETITIONER: LuAron Foster, Raising Cane's Restaurants LLC PUBLICATION DATE: January 11, 2023 REQUEST: Conditional Use for Drive -Through, Variation for Reduced Parking Setback MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Donnelly Walter Szymczak Ewa Weir Thomas Fitzgerald Greg Miller MEMBERS ABSENT: William Beattie Donald Olsen Norbert Mizwicki STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: William J. Cooney— Director of Community Development Ann Choi — Development Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Tom Szafranski, Kimley-Horn Dustin Johnson, ADA Architects Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM. Commissioner Miller made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on December 8, 2022. The minutes were approved 5-0. After hearing one previous case, at 7:10 PM Chairman Donnelly introduced case PZ -01-23: 915 E. Rand Road, a request for a conditional use permit for a drive-through and a variation for a reduced parking setback at the subject property. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. Ms. Choi introduced the case and presented maps showing the subject property within the overall context of the Village. Ms. Choi stated that the subject property is part of the Rand Road commercial corridor that includes major developments such as the Mount Prospect Plaza, Mount Prospect Pointe, Walmart, and Menards. Ms. Choi provided some background on the property and noted that the subject property was annexed in 1957 and is improved with a nearly 23,000 square foot vacant commercial building that was built in 1978 and closed in 2021. Ms. Choi stated that the subject property currently provides six full access driveways along Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, Central Road and Albert Street. 121 Ms. Choi stated that the Petitioner proposes to demolish the existing commercial building and construct a dual -lane drive-through for a single -story, 3,661 square foot fast-food restaurant with related improvements. Ms. Choi explained that the Petitioner proposes to close four of the six driveways, and the western Rand Road access would remain in its existing location and be converted into a right- in/right-out driveway. The Albert Street driveway would turn into a three-quarter access driveway where outbound right -turns onto Albert Street would be prohibited. Ms. Choi described the counterclock-wise rotation of the main vehicular circulation and stated that vehicles would enter from Rand Road and proceed along the western portion of the site, past a row of parking spaces, make two left turns after driving past the restaurant and parking, to enter the drive- through. Ms. Choi further explained that vehicles could also enter from the Albert Street driveway and follow the same counter -clockwise rotation to enter the drive-through. Customers would place their orders then proceed to the pickup window located along the northwest corner of the restaurant. After orders have been picked up, vehicles can make a right turn exiting the site directly onto Rand Road. Ms. Choi stated that left turns would be prohibited onto Rand Road. Ms. Choi further stated that cars could also proceed to the Albert Street driveway where vehicles would be directed to make a left turn onto Albert Street and cars could then proceed onto Central Road. Ms. Choi then presented a drive-through queuing plan and explained that 27 cars would be accommodated in the drive-through and an additional 9 cars can be accommodated to stack during the initial "honeymoon" period for a total of 36 cars before any cars would back onto the main driveway on the west side of the site. During this "honeymoon" period, a crewmember or directional sign can be placed along the site's western drive aisle to direct customers into the temporary extended drive- through lane that would be defined by traffic cones. Ms. Choi noted that any cars attempting to cut the line will be blocked from entering the drive-through by these traffic cones which would direct the cars back to the main drive. Ms. Choi stated that as part of the conditional use request, the project also proposes three canopies. One freestanding canopy would be located above the menu boards facing Mount Prospect Road and measures 32 feet by 42 feet with a total height of 11'-6" and the second freestanding canopy would be located over the pick-up window facing Rand Road and measures 19 feet by 21 feet with an overall height of 14'-2". Ms. Choi stated that there is a third canopy that is attached to the building that is located over the outdoor dining patio. Ms. Choi presented the requested variation and stated that the parking lot setbacks along Albert Street, Central Road, Mount Prospect Road and along the west property lines all comply with the Village Code's minimum ten foot parking setback but the parking lot setback along Rand Road frontage would range from 6.7 feet to 9.3 feet and that the Petitioner is seeking a variation to reduce the parking lot setback. Ms. Choi went on to present the landscape plan and explained because the site is currently almost all impervious, the Petitioner's landscape plan is a substantial improvement over the existing conditions as a significant amount of new landscaping will be provided site wide. Ms. Choi noted that there will be a continuous row of permanent peripheral screening made up of Sea Green Juniper shrubs around the perimeter of the parking lot and drive aisles which would provide screening for the abutting existing residential areas. 122 Ms. Choi added that a three-foot tall screening wall is also proposed at the intersection of Mount Prospect Road and Rand Road to mitigate any headlight glare coming from the cars towards any cars on Rand Road. Ms. Choi pointed out that staff requested that the Petitioner enhance the landscape concept for the large grassy area along the Central Road frontage as this is located at a prominent intersection and there is opportunity for a landscape feature along Central Road. Ms. Choi stated that there are minor revisions that need to be included in the current landscape plan which can be addressed during building permit submittal but staff is confident that appropriate landscaping can be achieved on the site. Ms. Choi then presented the floor plan which includes an indoor eating area accommodating 44 seats and a large outdoor patio area accommodating 50 seats. Ms. Choi then presented the building elevations and stated that the proposed building would be composed of brick, reclaimed metal panels, architectural panels, ad perforated metal panels. The proposed building height is 20'-6". Ms. Choi presented the signage and indicated that the sign package proposed a total of 4 wall signs, one along each building elevation, one freestanding ground sign at the Rand Road driveway, one secondary canopy sign above the outdoor patio, and one temporary sign pictured with a dog in sunglasses. Ms. Choi noted that this temporary sign would be considered a permanent fixture and may be changed without requiring a permit for the duration of that sign in that location of the building. Ms. Choi further stated that no temporary signage would be allowed on this side of the building unless this sign was removed. Ms. Choi presented the next slide that explained the parking and stacking required by the Village. Ms. Choi explained that the Village requires 12 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area taking out areas for storage, restrooms, and corridors. The proposed project will be providing 33 parking spaces when only 30 parking spaces are required. Ms. Choi indicated that the Petition submitted a Traffic Impact Study and the study concluded that the study intersections are projected to adequately accommodate the proposed redevelopment. Ms. Choi noted that the study noted that traffic exiting Albert Street must travel southbound to Central Road via the three-quarter access driveway restricting right -turn movements and "No Right Turn" signage. Ms. Choi also stated that the study also provided comparable local Raising Cane's facilities and concluded that the proposed parking supply and drive-through stacking would adequately accommodate proposed operations, and spillback from parking or the drive-through is not expected on adjacent roadways. Ms. Choi noted that the Village Engineer had reviewed the traffic impact study and the main concern was the amount of time it would take a vehicle to turn onto Central Road from Albert Street. Ms. Choi stated that the Village has committed to monitoring the intersection of Central Road and Albert Street after the restaurant's opening, should the project move forward, and look into widening Albert Street to provide two southbound lanes as part of a future resurfacing program, if necessary. Ms. Choi stated that the proposed project aligns with the Comprehensive Plan and its Future Land Use Map as the project is located along one of the most prominent intersections and gateways into the Village, is an auto -oriented commercial use with careful consideration given to minimize the traffic impacts to the surrounding neighborhoods, will serve as a local and regional attraction, is a redevelopment site, and will provide a substantial amount of landscape screening to reduce impacts to nearby residents. 123 Ms. Choi reported that staff found that the proposal meets the conditional use and variation standards and that staff is supportive of these requests. Ms. Choi stated that the proposed project would replace a vacant parcel with a vibrant new restaurant along the Rand Road commercial corridor, is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and as conditioned will be desirable by replacing an underutilized site with a use found to be in high demand for Mount Prospect and the surrounding communities. Ms. Choi recommended approval of the following motions: "To adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of: 1. A conditional use to allow for a dual -lane drive-through including the construction of 2 freestanding canopies over the drive-through consisting of one drive-through canopy measuring 10' in clearance height with a total area of 1,344 SF and one pick-up window canopy measuring 12'-8" in clearance height with a total area of 399 SF, one 3 -foot tall knee wall along the Rand Rd/Mount Prospect Rd frontage, and the installation of signage as illustrated in the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report; and 2. A variation to reduce the parking lot setback from 10 feet to 6.7 feet to 9.3 feet along the Rand Road frontage, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report." Ms. Choi stated that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. She then opened the floor for questions. Commissioner Miller asked if three feet would be high enough to block the heads lights for most vehicles. Ms. Choi responded that staff anticipates that it would be high enough but that the code has a sight triangle requirement that would restrict the wall from being taller than 3 feet. Commissioner Weir asked if the Petitioner was planning on building the continuation of the bike path on Rand Road. Director Cooney responded in the affirmative and that the bike paths are a part of the intersection improvements in that area. Commissioner Weir asked what type of perimeter shrub is being proposed. Ms. Choi stated that Sea Green Juniper shrubs would be planted and that it could grow to a height of 20 feet if they are not trimmed. The 20 foot height was stated in error and the response has been amended as of 01/30/2023 to reflect that Sea Green Juniper shrubs can grow to a height of 4 to 6 feet at maturity. Commissioner Weir asked if there were any requirements for native plantings because it appears as if the Swamp Oak was the only native planting. Ms. Choi responded that the Petitioner will typically follow the the recommended and prohibited plantings lists provided in the zoning code. Commissioner Weir asked if the hours of operation are until 3:30 in the morning. Ms. Choi responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Weir asked if the drive-through would be shut down at midnight. Ms. Choi stated that staff is recommending a condition of approval that would restrict the hours of operation of the drive-through to midnight. Chairman Donnelly asked if the restricted hours would be for the whole restaurant or for the drive-through only. Director of Community Development, Bill Cooney, stated that all businesses in all commercial districts could be open 24/7 and that the restaurant could stay open all night without the drive-through, but the drive-through is what the conditional use request is for and that is what is being restricted. 124 Commissioner Weir asked where the mechanical units would be located. Ms. Choi stated that the roof plan in the staff report shows they would be located on the roof. Commissioner Weir asked if they would be screened. Chairman Donnelly stated this is a question that should be directed at the Petitioner. Commissioner Weir asked if the 4 -foot median in the middle of the drive-through lanes was necessary to eliminate the request for the parking setback reduction. Chairman Donnelly reiterated this question should be directed at the petitioner or architect. Commissioner Miller asked if the parking lot setback reduction had been granted for other companies. Director Cooney stated that he could not pinpoint one on the top of his head but that the variation request is not unusual and that the Village has granted these in the past. Chairman Donnelly also confirmed that the Village has previously granted similar variation requests. Chairman Donnelly swore in the petitioner, Tom Szafranski, 970 Woodcrest Lane, Lemont IL. Mr. Szafranski provided some additional history of the restaurant and stated that Raising Cane's is a quick serve restaurant founded in 1996 by Todd Graves in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The restaurant's motto is "One Love" which is chicken fingers, and is reflected in the menu which includes chicken fingers, French fries, coleslaw and Texas toast. Mr. Szafranski stated the food is cooked to order to ensure the best quality and flavor possible. Mr. Szafranski stated that Raising Cane's is not your typical chain restaurant and will be a part of the community, starting with the community's name painted on the hand painted mural on the side of the building, and is one of the biggest community supporters whether school related or for other things. Mr. Szafranski explained that the building itself promotes visual aesthetics with variations not only in the architecture but with the building materials themselves, including variations in the building height, and ample landscaping around the site, producing a nice looking site. Mr. Szafranski stated that Raising Cane's is not a typical box fast-food restaurant. Raising Cane's will employ approximately 55 people at this location, with an average of 8 employees per shift. Mr. Szafranski requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission consider letting the restaurant stay open later since many of their customers work in the service industry, entertainment districts, or in the medical field that don't follow the typical business hours, and Raising Cane's would like the flexibility to keep the drive-through open longer. Mr. Szafranski stated that construction is anticipated to start in January 2024, and that they would like to be operational by September of 2024. Mr. Szafranski also stated that the project architect and traffic engineer were available to answer any questions. Commissioner Weir asked what the reasoning was behind the left -out only on Albert Street. Mr. Szafranski stated that this was requested by staff to avoid sending additional traffic towards the residential neighborhoods where the Henry Street/Rand Road intersection also has turn restrictions. Chairman Donnelly added that there was a previous zoning case that had an interesting discussion and that staff is sensitive to the neighbors who do not want commercial traffic going through the residential neighborhoods. Commissioner Weir asked if the proposed signage on all four sides of the building was necessary. 125 Chairman Donnelly swore in the petitioner, Dustin Johnston, ADA Architects, 17710 Detroit Avenue, Lakewood OH. Mr. Johnston replied that Raising Cane's branding is very important to them and that on this particular site, Mr. Johnston stated that they have reduced a lot of the typical signage that Raising Cane's likes to put on their stores which have the vibrant, have fun, visual in -your -face effect and Raising Cane's tries to address every side no matter which direction you are coming from. Chairman Donnelly asked the petitioners if they were meeting the requirements of the sign code and that they were not asking any relief from the Village of Mount Prospect's sign code requirements. Mr. Johnston stated that they were in compliance. Commissioner Weir asked if the signs are illuminated. Mr. Johnston responded that the oval signs are internally illuminated, the Red Dog banner has a downlight that lights it up, the mural does is not lit up but does lights that shine on it to brighten it up a bit. Mr. Johnston also pointed that the mural does have "Mount Prospect" on it and they are fully screened. The perforated metal at the top of the building is there for air so you would not see any units. Commissioner Weir asked if the petitioner could talk about the mechanical units and the visibility. Mr. Johnston stated all mechanical units and RTUs are located on the roof, and that the parapets go up higher than the units. Commissioner Weir asked if there were any storm water detention requirements on the site. Mr. Szafranski responded that the Village does require storm water detention so it will be provided in an underground vault. Chairman Donnelly wanted confirmation that the petitioners were not requesting any exceptions to the code on that and Mr. Szafranski responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Weir pointed out that a berm was being built on Central Road and Mr. Szafranski responded that a berm would be built with any excess soil. Chairman Donnelly asked if the screening wall would be built there and Mr. Szafranski stated that he screening wall would be located at the opposite side of the site. Commissioner Weir asked the petitioners if they would talk about the proposed landscaping and the lack of native plantings. Mr. Szafranski stated that their landscape architect is not present but that it is something they could explore but that he could not speak to it. Mr. Johnston stated Raising Cane's is big on landscaping and would be open to incorporate plantings that are native to the area and do not die in cold weather and would be happy to work with the Village on that. Commissioner Weir said the concern would be from the residential neighbors to the west and to the south, especially if there are illuminated signs and that any kind of screening would be helpful in that scenario. Commissioner Weir asked about the "LIV" tag in the landscape parking islands. Mr. Szafranski stated those are "LIR" and it is a groundcover that would be low to the ground. Commissioner Fitzgerald asked about the extended hours of operation and if those have been approved elsewhere. Mr. Johnston responded in the affirmative and noted that the Raising Cane's with the restricted hours in the surrounding areas are older locations with pre -pandemic hours. Mr. Johnston stated that they are requesting the extended hours as a result of the pandemic which changed the way they operate. Raising Cane's would stay open late as an option for first responders, nurses on a third shift, or for anyone who does not have a lot of options at 3 in the morning, they would like to be available as much as possible to the community. Mr. Johnston stated Raising Cane's does like to ask for these hours upfront but will modify the hours based on what each community needs. 126 Commissioner Fitzgerald asked about deliveries and trash service, and noted that the restaurant opens at 9:30 AM and if that was a tight window to get these done at a reasonable hour. Mr. Szafranski stated that it is always the intent to get these done at off hours so they are not conflicting with the customers on site. Chairman Donnelly asked if the off hours were not before 7 AM and expressed that he did not want deliveries occurring at 5 AM on the residential side. Chairman Donnelly also noted that unlike other drive-throughs, the proposed drive-through is on the commercial side, and not the residential side. Commissioner Fitzgerald pointed out that the local trash providers service the industrial and commercial customers on the earlier side and requested that the petitioners advocate for the residents for reasonable trash service hours. Chairman Donnelly asked why there was so much stacking and noted that 27 spaces is a lot of spots. Mr. Johnston reiterated that Raising Cane's is one of the leaders in drive-through stacking and that they do not want any stacking to occur outside of the site. One of their busiest sites requires 22 stacking spaces to prevent overflow outside of the site and the proposed site would provide 27 stacking spaces and assured the commissioners this would mitigate any traffic issues outside of the site. Mr. Johnston noted that Raising Cane's can get a car from the start of the drive-through to pick-up in just about two minutes. Off-duty policemen and staff would be hired to keep the traffic going during the honey period when the restaurant first opens. Chairman Donnelly stated that the proposed project dos not have a bypass lane but that when the restaurant is not busy, the second lane can act as a bypass lane. Mr. Szafranski stated that during off-peak hours, the secondary (north) lane can be coned off and act as the bypass lane. Chairman Donnelly asked the petitioners how many other Raising Cane's restaurants are located in the northwest suburbs of Chicago. Mr. Szafranski estimated there are 10 to 15 restaurants and stated that the closest location is on Palatine Road in Arlington Heights and one is being designed in Rolling Meadows as well. Mr. Szafranski also noted that Raising Cane's like to space their restaurants apart. Chairman Donnelly asked if the proposed location was an optimal site for them, and Mr. Szafranski responded in the affirmative and that Raising Cane's is excited about this location. Chairman Donnelly asked if the petitioners agreed with staff recommendations other than the proposed hours of operation. Mr. Szafranski responded that other than the hours, staff's recommendations were agreeable to Raising Cane's. Chairman Donnelly noted that the Village Board would have the final say on the hours of operation. Commissioner Weir asked if there were any limits on the hours of patio use. Mr. Johnston stated that the patio and indoor dining usually shut down first at around midnight or 1 AM and the drive-through stays open later. Director Cooney added that there are no specific regulations on the patio but if there were noise complaints, it would be evaluated at that time. Chairman Donnelly stated that any outdoor dining would have to be "back yard" quiet. Chairman Donnelly swore in Steve Polit of 601 Wilshire Drive, Mount Prospect IL, a property owner located a half -mile to the north and east of Rand Road. 127 Mr. Polit expressed concern about the traffic all going to Albert Street with the closures of the driveways on Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, and Central Road and stated that the only way you can get to the restaurant from the south, east, or west is to enter from Albert Street. Mr. Polit also pointed out that the only way one can exit the site to go north or to the east is to exit the site from Albert Street. Mr. Polit also expressed doubt about people obeying the left -out only from the Albert Street driveway. Mr. Polit pointed out that the Village previously restricted the Buona Beef and the Texas Roadhouse restaurants from having access to Henry Street but now Henry Street would be opened to new traffic from a new restaurant because people will find a way to get there without going through the intersection especially when construction starts. Mr. Polit further pointed out that he would like to avoid what has happened at Kensington Road, Elmhurst Road, and Rand Road where the state had restricted the ingress and egress and the shopping center there has been vacant for nearly two years and there are three units that have not been rented out in twenty years because of the terrible access. Chairman Donnelly swore in George Adamek of 28-38-26-44 Albert Street, Mount Prospect IL. Mr. Adamek expressed concern about the existing traffic and the traffic on Albert Street but is excited about the restaurant. Chairman Donnelly swore in Mike Aarons of 909 E. Central Road, Mount Prospect IL. Mr. Aarons voiced his concern about the existing traffic at the intersection of Central Road and Mount Prospect Road and cannot see how the addition of another business would solve the current problems they currently have there. Mr. Aarons also expressed concern about early morning deliveries and back- up on Albert Street for cars trying to get onto Central Road. Chairman Donnelly swore in Mary Paprek of 10 N. Albert Street, Mount Prospect IL. Ms. Paprek voiced her concerns about excessive noise coming from the outdoor patio and drive-through if it were to be open until 3 AM. Chairman Donnelly stated that Village Ordinance would require the restaurant to keep the noise down to a minimum. Director Cooney also added that outdoor dining would be required to close by 11 PM. Ms. Paprek also expressed concern about people making an illegal right -turn out of the Albert Street driveway and going through the neighborhoods. Chairman Donnelly stated that it would likely be the residents in the neighborhood making that illegal left -turn to get back home without going through the intersection and that it would be a ticketable offense to disobey the turn restrictions. Chairman Donnelly swore in Jennifer Betz of 2 N. Albert Street, Mount Prospect IL. Ms. Betz asked if the community has any input at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on the proposed hours of operation. Chairman Donnelly stated that the Village Board has the most input on the hours and reiterated the requested conditional use and variation requests. Chairman Donnelly swore in Steven Haynes of 808 E. Central Road, Mount Prospect IL. Mr. Haynes stated his concern about traffic on Albert Street getting onto Central. Mr. Haynes also asked what the odor from the restaurant would be like. Chairman Donnelly stated that restaurants are likely required to contain the odors on the property but will defer to the petitioners. Mr. Haynes also inquired 128 if the mechanical equipment would be completely screened or if they would be partially visible because his house looks down onto the building. Chairman Donnelly stated the petitioners are not asking for an exception to the code but that they would be allowed to put the mechanical units on the roof. Mr. Haynes would also be appreciative if the lighting was not on 24 hours a day. Chairman stated that all lighting would be required to stay on-site and not cause glare to the surrounding properties. Chairman Donnelly ask the petitioners about how the odor would be contained and about the history of the honeymoon periods. Mr. Johnston replied that the HVAC system would take care of the odors and would not cause more odors than any other typical fast food restaurant. Director Cooney added that he could not promise people would not smell anything but that the newer systems would contain a lot of the smell. Mr. Johnston also explained that the honeymoon period typically lasts an average of two weeks. Raising Cane's typically hires off-duty police, security guards, or other individuals to ensure that traffic is directed appropriately. Chairman Donnelly swore in the traffic engineer for the petitioner, Rory Fancler-Splitt, Kimley-Horn, 4201 Winfield Road #600, Warrenville IL. Ms. Fancler-Splitt stated that many of the traffic concerns that are raised are existing conditions and there are significant improvements that are being planned and designed for the intersection including additional turn lanes and signal timing modifications to improve traffic flow in this area, which are separate from the proposed project. Ms. Fancler-Splitt indicated that the traffic study did evaluate future conditions that took into consideration the planned improvements. Ms. Fancler-Splitt pointed that 50% of the traffic already exists, that the restaurant is bringing people into the site that are already on the road, and that the use is not adding a significant amount of new traffic. Ms. Fancler-Splitt added that in response to staff's recommendations, the driveway on Albert Street was restricted to prohibit right -turns. Ms. Fancler-Splitt also pointed that during peak hours (Saturday lunch), the study is not showing a significant queue on Albert Street. Hearing no further comments or questions, Chairman Donnelly closed the hearing and asked for a motion. Commissioner Miller made a motion seconded by Commissioner Fitzgerald to approve the motion as presented in the staff report. Chairman Donnelly asked if there was further discussion. Commissioner Fitzgerald asked if the hours of operation should be restricted to midnight per staff's recommendation. Chairman Donnelly responded that the hours for the outdoor patio are regulated separately, that the midnight restriction is already part of the recommendation, and that the Village Board will have the final say on the hours. Commissioner Weir stated she personally thinks people should be able to make a right onto Albert Street but understands staff's recommendation to keep people out of the residential neighborhoods. Commissioner Weir recommended to add more evergreen plantings as they are currently all deciduous, on the west property line to block the lighting from the parking, signs, and from the dining room. Commissioner Weir also recommended to paint the bike lane across the Rand Road driveway to green, if that is the standard, to announce to drivers that they are crossing a bike traffic lane. Chairman Donnelly asked if the Village as a zoning board has jurisdiction on the installation of bike lanes on this property. Director Cooney stated that staff could look into striping the bike lane but that he believes the bike lanes would be added as part of IDOT's overall improvements to the intersection. Chairman Donnelly made a motion to add another recommended condition of approval to add additional evergreen screening on the west side of the site on Albert Street between the parking lot and 129 10 the residential area. Commissioner Szymczak made a motion seconded by Commissioner Weir to approve the following condition: "To add additional evergreen plantings on the west side of the site along Albert Street between the parking lot and the residential area." UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Weir, Donnelly, Fitzgerald, Miller NAYS: None The motion to add the additional condition was approved by a vote of 5-0. Chairman Donnelly and Director Cooney stated that the bike lane issue would be taken care of by the Village to address Commissioner Weir's concerns. Hearing no further comments or questions, Chairman Donnelly asked for a motion. Commissioner Miller made a motion seconded by Commissioner Fitzgerald to discuss approval the following: "To adopt staff findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of: 1. A conditional use to allow for a dual -lane drive-through including the construction of two freestanding canopies over the drive-through consisting of one drive-through canopy measuring 10' in clearance height with a total area of 1,344 SF and one pick-up window canopy measuring 12'-8" in clearance height with a total area of 399 SF, one 3 -foot tall knee wall along the Rand Rd/Mount Prospect Rd frontage, and the installation of signage as illustrated in the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report and the additional condition of requiring additional evergreen plantings along the west side of the site; and 2. A variation to reduce the parking lot setback from 10 feet to 6.7 feet to 9.3 feet along the Rand Road frontage, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Weir, Donnelly, Fitzgerald, Miller NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 5-0 with a positive recommendation to the Village Board for the scheduled meeting on February 7, 2023. After continuing the hearing for the next item of new business (PZ -12-21 was continued to the March 9, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting), and hearing no citizens to be heard for non -agenda items, Chairman Donnelly made a motion seconded by Commissioner Miller and the meeting was adjourned at 8:23 PM. Ann Choi Development Planner 130 MAYOR Paul Wm. Hoefert TRUSTEES Agostino S. Filippone Terri Gens John J. Matuszak Richard F. Rogers Colleen E. Saccotelli Michael A. Zadel VILLAGE MANAGER Michael J. Cassady [cunt Prospect VILLAGE CLERK Karen Agoranos 1 Phone: 847/392-6000 Fax: 847/392-6022 www.mountprospect.org Village of Mount Prospect 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 January 19, 2023 LuAron Foster Raising Canes Restaurants LLC 6800 Bishop Road Plano, TX 75024-4274 Via e-mail: LFoster(a,raisingcanes.com Re: 915 E. Rand Road / Conditional Use: Drive -Through, VAR: Various / Review #2 Comments Dear Mr. Foster, The Village of Mount Prospect has reviewed the second submittal requesting a conditional use for a drive-through and variation, and has the following review comments: Planning Division: General: 1. Provide a point -by -point response letter addressing each of the comments provided in this review letter. 2. The following variation is requested: a. A variation from Section 14.2206(E)(1)(a) to permit a reduction in the minimum parking lot setback from ten feet (10') to six and seven tenths feet (6.7') to nine and three -tenths feet (9.3') along the Rand Road frontage. 3. All RTUs shall be screened if visible from the right of way. The roof top screens are perforated but the code does not specify that the screens need to be opaque. 4. No detail is provided on the transformer. Ground equipment shall be adequately screened. Landscape Plan: 5. Staff requests that the Petitioner revise the large grassy area along Central Road as there is an opportunity for an attractive landscape feature within this area. 6. Proposed shrub mix is 26% deciduous, 74% evergreen; code requires 50% of each type. Plants identified as "groundcover" was not included in this calculation. 7. Verify that Redmond American Linden trees are not too tall to be located near overhead power lines on Rand Road. 8. Two of the landscape islands have light poles in lieu of shade trees. 9. The landscape island between the ADA parking stall and the dumpster enclosure does not have a shade tree. 131 10. Submittal of landscape and irrigation plans that comply with Village codes and regulations shall be required at time of building permit submittal. Signage: 11. The proposed painted mural sign on substrate must not exceed the maximum size required under Section 7.302(A)(2) or 131 SF. The proposed sign has an area of 139.5 SF. 12. No signage variations are being requested or are approved. Photometric Plan: 13. Canopy foot candle readings are missing. 14. Proposed maximum parking lot illumination of 6.2 foot candles exceeds the maximum permitted 5.0 foot candles for commercial areas. 15. The statistics box lists the maximum foot candles for the parking field as 9.6, but this number is not reflected in the photometric diagram. 16. Submittal of a photometric plan that complies with Village codes and regulations shall be required at time of building permit submittal. Public Works Department: PW has no objections to the conditional use requested to allow a drive-thru or the variation requested to reduce the setback from 10' to 67. 17. The Traffic Impact Study provided shows that the proposed development will cause an increase in the average delay in turning from southbound Albert Street onto Central Road from 24 seconds to 95 seconds. The Village will review the traffic impacts to the neighborhood within a six month time frame after the project is operational and if necessary, the Village will widen Albert Street to accommodate three lanes— two southbound lanes (one shared through/left-turn lane and one dedicated right -turn lane) and one northbound lane to improve the level of service at the intersection of Central Road and Albert Street. The following items need not be addressed for P&Z approval, but must be addressed prior to issuing a Building Permit: 18. Should the project receive approval and move to permit review, Public Works will perform a more detailed review of the driveway onto Albert Street to ensure safe movement into and out of the site, as well as to discourage traffic from violating the right turn prohibition. The plan is conceptually acceptable but may require some minor design changes before final approval. 19. Provide wayfinding signage on and around the site to direct traffic to/from the Albert Street driveway. 20. The proposed signage shown on the plans is not specific. The Engineering Division will conduct a thorough review of the proposed site signage and pavement markings to ensure safe and efficient movement. 21. Sidewalk across driveways must be poured separately from the aprons. 22. The existing water service must be disconnected at the main and a new tap will have to be made for the new service by means of a pressure connection. 23. The trash enclosure will need to be covered; otherwise, the nearby drain is to be connected to the storm sewer system. 24. Consider vacating any on-site easements that will no longer be necessary. 25. A permit from IDOT will be required for any work within the Rand Road and Central Road rights-of-way. 132 Building Division: 26. Signage shall be allowed as presented on the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects, and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI. One secondary canopy sign (One Love lettering) is larger than the code would normally allow, but is acceptable in the overall conditional use approval. In addition, the temporary sign (pictured with a dog in sunglasses) is a permanent fixture that may be changed without requiring a permit for the duration of that sign in that location on the building. No other temporary signage shall be allowed on this side of the building unless this sign is removed. Fire Department: The petitioner is advised that the following items must be addressed before final certification of occupancy will be granted. The Fire Department has granted conditional approval for Planning and Zoning. The petitioner is further advised that the following items must be included in the building/site plans submittal: 27. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 will be required for this project. Ensure fire sprinkler shop drawings, hydraulic calculations, and equipment cut sheets are submitted for review. Village of Mount Prospect Fire Prevention Code, 24.202 28. A fire alarm system will be required for this building. Ensure fire alarm shop drawings point-to- point wiring diagrams, battery load calculations, and equipment cut sheets are submitted for review. Village of Mount Prospect Fire Prevention Code, 24.204 29. All new sprinkler risers and associated equipment shall be located in a separate room with a minimum of one-hour construction. 30. A minimum of three feet (3') clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of any new or existing fire hydrant, fire department connection, fire protection control valve or any other fire protection system component 31. An egress plan must be provided for the space. This plan must include occupant loads, travel distances, egress widths, and common path of travel distances. An egress plan will be required when the building plans are submitted for review. Additional exits may be required. 32. All egress doors are to use keyless locksets on the egress side. No flush bolts, dead or draw bolts, etc. will be allowed. Life Safety Code, 7.2.1.5.1 133 Please make the changes as noted above and submit a point-by-point response letter and pdf files of the drawings. You may e-mail the digital copy. Feel free to contact me at (847) 818-5314 / achoi@mountprospect.org if you have any questions. c: File Sincerely, Ann Choi Development Planner Community Development 134 WIN M111M TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary ..............................................................................................................................................2 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................................3 2. Existing Conditions.......................................................................................................................................5 3. Development Characteristics......................................................................................................................11 4. Future Conditions.......................................................................................................................................16 5. Site Review.................................................................................................................................................25 6. Recommendations & Conclusions..............................................................................................................28 Appendix.............................................................................................................................................................29 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Level of Service Grading Descriptions..................................................................................................8 Table 2.2 Level of Service Grading Criteria..........................................................................................................8 Table 2.3 Existing (2022) Levels of Service..........................................................................................................9 Table 3.1 ITE Trip Generation Data....................................................................................................................11 Table 3.2 Site -Generated Traffic Projections......................................................................................................12 Table 3.3 Estimated Trip Distribution..................................................................................................................12 Table 4.1 Future (2028) No -Build Levels of Service...........................................................................................18 Table 4.2 Future (2028) Build Levels of Service.................................................................................................22 Table 4.3 Future (2028) Build Levels of Service — Alternate Geometry at Central Road/Albert Street ...............23 Table 5.1 Observed Parking Occupancy - Raising Cane's Schaumburg & Glen Ellyn.......................................25 Table 5.2 Drive-Thru Observations - Raising Cane's Schaumburg & Glen Ellyn................................................27 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit1: Site Location Map.................................................................................................................................4 Exhibit 2: Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes............................................................................................................7 Exhibit 3: Site Trip Assignment — Primary Trips..................................................................................................13 Exhibit 4: Site Trip Assignment — Pass -By Trips.................................................................................................14 Exhibit 5: Site Trip Assignment — Total Site Trips...............................................................................................15 Exhibit 6: Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections..........................................................................................17 age I Jani. n 0 k311 E'„83`108( u,37 136 WIN It M111M Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) was retained by Raising Cane's Restaurants, LLC (Raising Cane's) to perform a traffic impact study for a proposed Raising Cane's restaurant in Mount Prospect, Illinois. Access to the site is currently provided by six full -access driveways along Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, Central Road, and Albert Street. The proposed redevelopment would remove four of these driveways and convert one of the full -access driveways to a right-in/right-out only driveway along Rand Road (Access A). The other access would be a three-quarter access driveway (outbound right -turn prohibited) to Albert Street (Access B). The anticipated build year of the project is 2023. This traffic impact study evaluates existing and future traffic conditions for area intersections and the proposed site access driveways following redevelopment of the subject site. The Village of Mount Prospect has plans to improve the intersections of Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road, Central Road/Mount Prospect Road, and Rand Road/Central Road within the study area; the future improvements were assumed to be complete for the analysis of both future no -build and build conditions. Based on a review of future traffic conditions, site -generated traffic is not expected to materially impact the study intersections. Therefore, no off-site improvements were identified to accommodate site traffic. Based on data observed at two existing Raising Cane's sites, the parking supply and drive-through stacking provided onsite are expected to accommodate projected operational demands. The proposed parking supply and drive-through stacking exceeds minimum requirements established by the Village of Mount Prospect. At the right-in/right-out driveway to Rand Road (Access A), "No Left Turn" signage would be posted for outbound traffic. The access driveway to Albert Street (Access B) would be designed to prohibit outbound right -turn movements in order to limit impacts to the adjacent neighborhoods. "No Right Turn" signage would be posted for outbound traffic at Access B. Minor -leg stop -control should be posted for outbound traffic at each of the site driveways along with stop signs and stop bars. These study results are discussed in more detail in the Recommendations & Conclusions section of this report. age 2 Jani. n 0 k311 E'„831 108( u,37 137 WIN It M111M Kimley-Horn was retained to conduct a traffic impact study for a proposed Raising Cane's development located at 915 East Rand Road in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The site is currently occupied by a retail development. The proposed redevelopment would reconfigure the existing site to include a Raising Cane's restaurant with dual drive-through lanes. It is anticipated the redevelopment would be completed in 2023. Access to the site is currently provided by six full -access driveways along Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, Central Road, and Albert Street. The proposed redevelopment would remove four of these access driveways. The existing western access to Rand Road would remain in its existing location and be converted to right-in/right-out only (Access A). In addition, a three-quarter access driveway (outbound right -turn prohibited) to Albert Street would be provided (Access B). An aerial view of the study location and surrounding roadway network is presented in Exhibit 1. As part of this study, the existing roadway network was analyzed to determine the current operations at the study intersections. Site trip generation characteristics were established for the redevelopment and added to the background traffic volumes in order to assess the site's potential impact on the area roadway network. This report presents and documents data collection, summarizes the evaluation of the existing and projected future traffic conditions on the surrounding roadways, and identifies recommendations to address the potential impact of site -generated traffic on the adjacent roadway network. age Jani. n 0 k3 11 >1 108( E3 7 138 _ EXHIBIT 1 WIN M111M Kimley-Horn conducted a review of the subject site including existing land uses in the surrounding area, the adjacent street system, current traffic volumes and operating conditions, lane configurations and traffic controls at nearby intersections, and other key roadway characteristics. This section of the report details information on the existing conditions. Ilf;;;: iiistiiiing Roadway wa hiaiiracteiriiistiiics The following information was obtained about the existing roadway network. Rand Road (US 12) is located along the northeast frontage of the subject site. Running northwest - southeast through the study area, Rand Road provides two travel lanes in each direction. At its unsignalized intersection with Henry Street, Rand Road provides a dedicated left -turn lane and two through lanes on the south leg. On the north leg of the intersection, Rand Road provides one through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane. At its signalized intersection with Mount Prospect Road, Rand Road provides two through lanes, a dedicated left -turn lane, and a dedicated right -turn lane on the north leg. Rand Road provides two through lanes and a dedicated right -turn lane on the south leg of the intersection. Northbound left turns from Rand Road onto Mount Prospect Road are prohibited. At its signalized intersection with Central Road, Rand Road provides two through lanes and a dedicated left -turn lane on the north leg. Rand Road provides a dedicated left -turn lane, a dedicated through -lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the south leg of the intersection. The right -turn movement is channelized at the intersection. Southbound right turns from Rand Road onto Central Road are prohibited. Rand Road has a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour (MPH) through the study area and is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Rand Road is classified as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA) by IDOT and the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). The SRA system was established by IDOT to promote mobility on key routes throughout the Chicago area by applying various strategies, such as access control and limited signalization. As explained later in this report, SRA facilities are subject to more stringent operational requirements than other roadways within the state. Central Road is an east -west highway located along the southern frontage of the subject site. Through the study area, Central Road provides two travel lanes in each direction and has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. At its unsignalized intersection with Albert Street, Central Road provides shared through/right-turn and shared through/left-turn lanes on the east and west legs. At its signalized intersection with Mount Prospect Road, Central Road provides a dedicated left -turn lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the west leg. On the east leg, Central Road provides two through lanes and a dedicated left -turn lane. Westbound right turns from Central Road onto Mount Prospect Road are prohibited. At its signalized intersection with Rand Road, Central Road provides a dedicated through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the west leg. Central Road provides two through lanes, a dedicated left -turn lane, and a dedicated right -turn lane on the east leg. Eastbound left turns from Central Road onto Rand Road are prohibited. Classified as a Minor Arterial, Central Road is under the jurisdiction of IDOT. Mount Prospect Road is a north -south highway located along the eastern frontage of the subject site. Through the study area, Mount Prospect Road provides two travel lanes in each direction and age Janis pn/ 0:,31 iE',83;>1 108(u,37 140 WIN M111M has a posted speed limit of 30 MPH. At its signalized intersection with Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road provides a dedicated left -turn lane and a shared through/left-turn lane on the south leg of the intersection; northbound right turns from Mount Prospect Road onto Rand Road are prohibited. The north leg of this intersection is a private driveway, which provides a shared through/right-turn lane and shared through/left-turn lane. At its signalized intersection with Central Road, Mount Prospect Road provides a through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the north leg. Mount Prospect provides a shared through/right-turn lane and shared through/left-turn lane on the south leg of the intersection. Southbound left turns from Mount Prospect Road onto Central Road are prohibited. Classified as a Major Collector, Mount Prospect Road is under the jurisdiction of Cook County. Albert Street is a north -south local roadway located along the southwestern frontage of the subject site. Albert Street provides one travel lane in each direction and has a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. At its minor -leg stop -controlled T -intersection with Henry Street, Albert Street provides one shared left-turn/right-turn lane. At its minor -leg stop -controlled intersection with Central Road, Albert Street provides a single shared lane on the north and south legs of the intersection. Albert Street is under the jurisdiction of Mount Prospect. Henry Street is an east -west local roadway located north of the subject site. Henry Street provides one travel lane in each direction and has a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. At its minor -leg stop - controlled intersection with Albert Street, Henry Street provides one shared through/right-turn lane on the west leg and one shared through/left-turn lane on the east leg. At its minor -leg stop -controlled T - intersection with Rand Road, Henry Street provides one shared lane. Although observed in the field, eastbound left -turn movements are prohibited from Henry Street onto Rand Road from 6:00-9:OOAM and 4:00-6:30PM on weekdays. Henry Street is under the jurisdiction of Mount Prospect. I"'iirat iiic Count II ata Turning movement count data was collected in August 2022 at the following intersections: • Henry Street / Albert Street • Rand Road / Henry Street • Rand Road / Mount Prospect Road • Central Road / Albert Street • Central Road / Mount Prospect Road • Rand Road / Mount Prospect Road The traffic counts were conducted during the weekday morning and evening, and Saturday midday peak periods (7:00-9:OOAM, 4:00-6:OOPM, and 11:OOAM-1:OOPM, respectively). These count periods were selected in order to capture peak travel periods in the area. The traffic count data indicates that peak traffic volumes occur within the study area from 7:30-8:30AM and 4:45-5:45PM on a typical weekday and 11:45AM-12:45PM on Saturday. The existing peak hour volumes were rounded to the nearest multiple of five and balanced between adjacent intersections. Existing peak hour traffic volumes are presented in Exhibit 2. A summary of the count data is provided in the appendix. ag��'��� 6 Ja n uan/ O::::31 "16'8341 �:�i�::�u�;� .� � 141 4** _1 1�00�1-1� NORTH s- NOT TO SCALE 10 (40) [30] - (5) [51 mmq HENRY ,STREET [10] (10)10 __MOM [5] (5) 5 [5] (5} 5 [10] (10)10 —� v o ITS N .A O n+ LEGEND XX Weekday AM Peak (7:30 – 8:30am) () Weekday PM Peak (4:45 – 5:45pm) [] Saturday Midday Peak (11:45am–12:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection -0- Existing Stop Sign — Less than Five Vehicles Kirnley,,)) Horn 3 N [10] (15)10 [145] (150) 95 [740] (810) 900 T [585] (655) 805 [5] (5) 5 [30] (20)10 o N O ✓� �0 o 115 (160) [180] 450 (645) [450] 30 (30) [30] CENTRAL ROAD o y [485] (530) 605 [220] (250) 320 k N N o �, 5 (15) [51 m o 0 0 595 (1060) [675] 5 (15) [10] [10] (15)10 [145] (150) 95 [740] (810) 900 T [585] (655) 805 [5] (5) 5 [30] (20)10 o N O 535 (840) [545] 90 (130) [100] CENTRAL ROAD � Tr SEE INSET A i ✓� �0 o 115 (160) [180] 450 (645) [450] 30 (30) [30] CENTRAL ROAD [485] (530) 605 [220] (250) 320 k 535 (840) [545] 90 (130) [100] CENTRAL ROAD � Tr SEE INSET A i WIN It M111M 111:..:.:xistiing Calpacity Ainallysis Capacity analyses were conducted to assess existing, future no -build, and future build operating conditions at the study intersections during the weekday and Saturday midday peak hours. The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS), measured in average delay per vehicle. LOS grades range from A to F, with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at -capacity conditions, and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The lowest LOS grade typically accepted by jurisdictional transportation agencies in Northeastern Illinois is LOS D, and a minimum LOS C is required for through movements on SRA routes such as Rand Road (US 12). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver's discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 2.1. Table 2.1 Level of Service Grading Descriptions' 'Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition The range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is shown in Table 2.2. Because signalized intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red time, higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. Table 2.2 Level of Service Grading Criteria' 'Highway Capacity Manual, 61h Edition 2AII movements with a Volume to Capacity (v/C) ratio greater than 1 receive a rating of LOS F. age y Jani. n 0 k31 iE',83;>1 108(1u137 143 WIN 5 Fill M111M Based on these standards, capacity results were identified for the study intersections under existing conditions. The results of the capacity analysis for existing conditions are summarized in Table 2.3. In this table, operation on each approach is quantified according to the average delay per vehicle and the corresponding level of service. The results are based on Synchro's HCM 6th Edition for the unsignalized intersections and are based on Synchro's Lanes, Volumes, and Timings reports for the signalized intersections due to the unique phasing and limitations of HCM methodologies. Copies of the Synchro reports are provided in the appendix. The signal timings used in the analysis of the signalized intersections were obtained from IDOT. Table 2.3 Existing (2022) Levels of Service Henry Street / Albert Street A Westbound (Left) 7 A 7 A 7 A Northbound 9 A 9 A 9 A Rand Road / Henry Street A Eastbound 25 C 43 E 28 D Northbound (Left) 11 B 13 B 11 B Rand Road / Mount Prospect Road �k Eastbound 12 B 19 B 16 B Westbound 8 A 23 C 26 C Northbound 60 E 36 D 30 C Southbound 41 D 85 F >120 F Intersection 19 B 30 C 52 D Central Road / Albert Street A Eastbound (Left) 9 A 11 B 9 A Westbound (Left) 10+ B 10- A 9 A Northbound 27 D 18 C 20 C Southbound 19 C 24 C 15- B Central Road / Mount Prospect Road Eastbound 15 B 18 B 16 B Westbound 8 A 17 B 11 B Northbound 32 C 38 D 35 D Southbound 27 C 35 D 25 C Intersection 17 B 24 C 20 C Rand Road / Central Road Eastbound 22 C 34 C 23 C Westbound 22 C 31 C 26 C Northbound 21 C 29 C 22 C Southbound 12 B 13 B 14 B Intersection 19 B 27 C 21 C is -Signalized Intersection L -Minor -Leg Stop -Controlled Intersection ag��'��� 9 Ja n ua n/ O :::: 3116'83410 144 M111MWIN The study intersections currently operate acceptably during typical weekday peak hours and the Saturday midday peak hour with a few notable exceptions. At the minor -leg stop -controlled intersection of Rand Road/Henry Street, the eastbound approach operates acceptably at LOS D or better during the weekday morning and Saturday midday peak hours. During the weekday evening peak hour, the eastbound approach operates at LOS E due to heavy mainline (northbound and southbound) traffic along Rand Road. It is not uncommon for stop - controlled minor -leg approaches to experience higher levels of delay as traffic along the mainline results in limited gaps in traffic flow. It should be noted that eastbound left -turn movements were observed in the field and included in the analysis; however, based on posted signage this movement is prohibited during the evening peak hour. The signalized intersection of Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road overall operates acceptably at LOS D or better during all peak hours. Both the eastbound and westbound through movements on Rand Road operate at LOS C or better during all peak hours, satisfying the IDOT minimum LOS requirement for an SRA route. However, the northbound approach operates at LOS E during the morning peak hour, and the southbound approach operates at LOS F during the evening and Saturday midday peak hours. The estimated delay is largely a function of the signal priority given to east -west traffic along Rand Road to facilitate efficient flow along the arterial. As a result, relatively limited green time is allocated to north -south traffic on Mount Prospect Road. @']e i 0 Jani. n 0 k3 11 E: 83; 108(E37 145 WIN 5 Fill It M111M 3. DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS This section of the report outlines the proposed site plan and summarizes site-specific traffic characteristics. ljf)evelll 1piirmmeinf Illnailra feiiiii f The proposed redevelopment would include a 3,661 square -foot Raising Cane's restaurant with dual drive-through lanes. The site is currently occupied by a retail development, which would be removed to accommodate the redevelopment. The retail development was vacant at the time of data collection. Proposed access to the site would be provided by one right-in/right-out driveway to Rand Road (Access A) and a three-quarter access driveway (outbound right -turn prohibited) to Albert Street (Access B). This access configuration would replace six existing full -access driveways along Rand Road, Mount Prospect Road, Central Road, and Albert Street. Construction is expected to take place in 2023. iiiiill Geneiratioin In order to calculate trips generated by the proposed redevelopment, data was referenced from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Trip generation rates for the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) corresponding to the proposed use are shown in Table 3.1. A copy of the ITE data is provided in the appendix. Table 3.1 ITE Trip Generation Data Fast Food Restaurant with Drive- Per 1,000 SF 467.48X 44.61X1 33.03X 55.25X Through Window (LUC 934) 50% in/50% out 51 % in/49% out 52% in/48% out 52% in/48% out X = square feet (SF) of development 'Raising Cane's restaurant is not anticipated to be open during the AM Peak Hour. However, to provide a conservative analysis, an AM Peak Hour analysis was considered should expected operations change in the future. 2The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition does not provide Saturday Midday Peak Hour of Adjacent Street trip generation data for LUC 934; therefore, data for Saturday Peak Hour of Generator data was used. For purposes of this study, site generated trips are expected to exhibit multiple routing patterns when traveling to and from the subject site, as described below: • Pass -by........ IPassby tira'If1ic iref1lects tlhe'tiravell Ipa'tterns of moto ids't.s who are alliready tiravellliirng cairn the adjacent study roadway and stole at the site earn route to airnother destlirnatlion. II:::)ata liirn the °t 1tlln IEdlitlioirn Sulplplleirnneirnt to the Il lFE"]' lr,ji,p Gene iratlioirn Handbook 3rd IEdlitlioirn, revealls that at a Fast (Food Il estauirairnt wlitll"n IDidve li Ihirouglh Window (Il UC 934), rouglhlly 50 Ipeircen it of vehliclles du.uirliing the weekday urrnorirnliirng and 55 Ipeirceirnt of veli°nliclles du irliirng the weekday eveirnlirng Ipeak peiriiods are 1.)ass by tirlilps. II FE data is not 1provlided for dalilly Maass dt)y tii therefore, the weekday irn~noirnliirng ICaass by Ipeirceirntage of 50 Iperceirnt was alplplllied. Il::1ass 1by data is not Ipirovlided for, the Saturday rrnilidday Ipeak Ipeirliod, so the weekday eveirnliirng I{aass by irate of 55 Ipeirceirnt was assuimed. F :nn°rsrnl n , nr° Y r ,,t ld at:arancra rrnl nn.,arai II ren,:„l,.e wta IIA @n,,]e 1 l Ja nn.s nit, 0 k3 11r;,;; 10(:1")7 146 WIN M111M • Primary Trips Vell°rllc: les 'tha't tiravell to the subject devellolpirnein�t and tll°ren return 61rectlly to theliir 1pllace of oirli� iiin acre calllled " hlirnai tri` g I` triips ireflect anew tiraffiic vOkAmes I � IC ' ' ills." li:::; rimair geineirated Icy the 1proposed devellol meant that wound alppiroaclh and deli°:)airt oin tt-ie same route,. IFidps tolfiroirn the slit.e that acre roof 1pass by trlilias are expected to Ik e li.)rlimary trlilps. Table 3.2 shows the site -generated traffic projections. Table 3.2 Site -Generated Traffic Projections Fast Food Restaurant with Drive - Through Window (LUC 934) 'In/Out volumes are rounded to the nearest multiple of five. zBased upon the 11th Edition Supplement to the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, pass -by trips for LUC 934 are estimated to be 50 percent during the weekday morning and 55 percent during the weekday evening. ITE data is not provided for daily pass -by trips; therefore, the weekday morning pass -by percentage (50 percent) was applied. ITE data is also not provided for Saturday midday peak pass -by trips; therefore, the weekday evening pass -by percentage (55 percent) was applied. III!)iiiireetiii inalll ID iistilrlIlbutiii oin The estimated distribution of site -generated traffic on the surrounding roadway network as it approaches and departs the site is a function of several variables, such as the nature of surrounding land uses, prevailing traffic volumes/patterns, characteristics of the street system, and the ease with which motorists can travel over various sections of that system. The anticipated directional distributions estimated for the primary trips and pass -by trips are outlined in Table 3.3. Table 3.3 Estimated Trip Distribution Easton Rand Road 25% 25% West on Rand Road 20% 25% East on Central Road 20% 20% West on Central Road 20% 20% South on Mount Prospect Road 10% 10% West on Henry Street 5% - Total 100% 100% Pass -by trips are categorized by the trip's origin. Based on these assumptions, the site trip assignment for primary trips and pass -by trips are illustrated on Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4, respectively. The total site -generated trips are depicted in Exhibit 5. age ,12 Januan/0��:x'311 168`4�1 3?, 147 4** N O R T H NOT TO SCALE [51(-) - --� 'o 10 (10) [15] y HENRY STREET MOM _ s NN F Rf JO` JO e%ITENlT 2S LEGEND XX Weekday AM Peak (7:30 — 8:30am) () Weekday PM Peak (4:45 — 5:45pm) [] Saturday Midday Peak (11:45am—12:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection -40- Existing Stop Sign mom Proposed Stop Sign — Less than Five Vehicles Kimley,,)) Horn 1 w 15 (10) [151 -- - - - -- INSETA---- - - - - - _ 20 (15) [25] RAND ROAD -0- [10](5)10 n 0 o � = =_ c IV a 2 _ f �✓ �o f s 90 SOY10 (5) [10] - - y CENTRAL ROAD s [5] (5) 10 [10] (5) 10 Cn vI, y \ 170 _ o o 3 V 12= � o 10 (5) [10] CENTRAL ROAD SEE INSET B cn RZ 91 RfA,, I R kffl 5.1 , � MP Z 4** N O R T H NOT TO SCALE 10 (10) [15] HENRY STREET MOM ® 0 Rf 0 Nl� SITE J LEGEND XX Weekday AM Peak (7:30 – 8:30am) () Weekday PM Peak (4:45 – 5:45pm) [XX] Saturday Midday Peak (11:45am–12:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection -40- Existing Stop Sign mom Proposed Stop Sign — Less than Five Vehicles Kimley,,)) Horn 1 w 0 [10] (5) 10 [-10] (-5) -10 10 (10) [15] -5 (-5) [-10] [20] (15)15 -- - - - -- INSETA---- - - - - - _ 10 (10) [15] RAND ROAD [-15] (-10) 10 [15] (10)10 n 0 0 _ � o a =------ ------ INSETB �_ 2 _ - d = �O 90 MEL CENTRAL ROAD SEE INSET B EXHIBIT , TRIP ASSIGNMENT - PASS -BY N O R T H NOT TO SCALE [51(-) - --� LEGEND 'o 20 (20) [30] y HENRY STREETMOM ��Jo �X`'i a �FFi� ls°l e%ITE 0 l3Sfj�Q/�O �T QS IU�O I XX Weekday AM Peak (7:30 – 8:30am) () Weekday PM Peak (4:45 – 5:45pm) [XX] Saturday Midday Peak (11:45am–12:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection -40- Existing Stop Sign mom Proposed Stop Sign — Less than Five Vehicles Kimley,,)) Horn 1 0 [151 (10) 20 [-10] (-5) -10 25 (20) [301 - 5 (-5) [-10] -- - - - -- INSETA---- - - - - - _ 30 (25) [40] RAND ROA11 - [-15] (-10) -10 [25] (15) 20 a 0 CD y o 2 _ d o \ 10 (5) [101 Js [30] (20) 25 Cn vI, y CENTRAL ROAD \ 170 — N _ 12� � o A 10 (5) [10] _ CENTRAL ROAD SEE INSET B CD C -n CS 0 I P YIRR , , %impt"M WIN M111M 4. FUTURE CONDITIONS This section of the report outlines planned roadway improvements and develops future traffic projections for analysis. Ilf°° tuure 111 a llkgur uind "'I"'uraffiiie Ill"ur jeetiii un Background traffic growth was estimated using data from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). Based on CMAP projections, a background growth rate of 0.51 percent was applied for a period of six years based on existing traffic counts collected in 2022 and a future year of 2028. A future year of 2028 was selected in compliance with IDOT standards requiring future conditions reflective of project build year + five years. Future (2028) Background Traffic Projections are illustrated in Exhibit 6. Ilf::'utuire Roadway 111impurovement Based on information obtained from the Village of Mount Prospect, there are planned roadway improvements in the study area. These improvements are expected to be constructed by others prior to 2028; and therefore, they were assumed to be completed for the Future (2028) No -Build and Build scenarios. The planned improvements are summarized below and depicted in the Intersection Design Study provided in appendix. • Installation of a dedicated southbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Central Road/Mount Prospect Road spanning the approximate 160 -foot distance between the intersections of Central Road/Mount Prospect Road and Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road. • Installation of a dedicated northbound left -turn lane at the intersection of Central Road/Mount Prospect Road providing 185 feet of storage with a 75 -foot taper. • Installation of a dedicated northbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Central Road/ Mount Prospect providing 145 feet of storage with a 155 -foot taper. • Redesign of the existing southbound approach at the intersection of Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road to allow southbound right -turn movements only. • Installation of a dedicated eastbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Rand Road/Central Road providing 115 feet of storage with a 90 -foot taper. • Installation of an additional southbound left -turn lane at the intersection of Rand Road/Central Road providing 185 feet of storage with a 145 -foot taper. • Installation of an additional northbound left -turn lane at the intersection of Rand Road/Central Road providing 235 feet of storage with a 300 -foot taper. • Retiming of the traffic signals at Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road, Central Road/Mount Prospect Road, and Rand Road/Central Road. @']e i Janis n 0::.3 11 108( E37 151 I N O R T H o, NOT TO SCALE 10 (40) [30] - (5) [5] mmq HENRY STREET [10] (10)10 -MOM [5] (5) 5 [51 (5) 5 - [10] (10) 10 —� W o PRo Rf LEGEND XX Weekday AM Peak (7:30 – 8:30am) () Weekday PM Peak (4:45 – 5:45pm) [] Saturday Midday Peak (11:45am–12:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection -0- Existing Stop Sign — Less than Five Vehicles Kimley,,)) Horn 1 N �Xs [101 (15) 10 [150] (155) 100 [7651 (835) 930 [6051 (675) 830 [5] (5) 5 [30] (20) 10 O N O 9Q 120 (165) [185] o 465 (665) [465] 30 (30) [301 y CENTRAL ROAD [5051 (545) 625 [225] (260) 330 k s ------------- v 6j S%7p W W o cn 3 0; 12 CP �o A Cl) A O 550 (865) [560] 95 (135) [105] CENTRAL ROAD SEE INSET A -4 1111111kV O W N Ul C7l N W W � O W (") N o � EXHIBIT 6 FUTURE 1 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS �w o o w _ O O Ul CDN 610 (1090) [6951 S C11 5 (15) [10] [101 (15) 10 [150] (155) 100 [7651 (835) 930 [6051 (675) 830 [5] (5) 5 [30] (20) 10 O N O 9Q 120 (165) [185] o 465 (665) [465] 30 (30) [301 y CENTRAL ROAD [5051 (545) 625 [225] (260) 330 k s ------------- v 6j S%7p W W o cn 3 0; 12 CP �o A Cl) A O 550 (865) [560] 95 (135) [105] CENTRAL ROAD SEE INSET A -4 1111111kV O W N Ul C7l N W W � O W (") N o � EXHIBIT 6 FUTURE 1 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS WIN It M111M III°:°u tuir (2023) INo Ilf Willld Callpacity Ainallysis Based on the volume projections presented in Exhibit 6, capacity results were identified for the study intersections under Future (2028) No -Build conditions. The results of capacity analysis are summarized in Table 4.1. The results of the unsignalized intersections are based on Synchro's HCM 6th Edition, consistent with the Existing Conditions analysis. However, the results of all signalized intersections are based on Synchro's Lanes, Volumes, and Timings reports due to unique phasing at the intersections and limitations of HCM methodologies. The proposed signal timings were obtained from the Village of Mount Prospect. Copies of the Synchro reports are provided in the appendix. Table 4.1 Future (2028) No -Build Levels of Service Henry Street / Albert Street A Westbound (Left) 7 A 7 A 7 A Northbound 9 A 9 A 9 A Rand Road / Henry Street A Eastbound 27 D 62 F 37 E Northbound (Left) 11 B 14 B 12 B Rand Road / Mount Prospect Road Eastbound 36 D 25 C 25 C Westbound 17 B 17 B 20- B Northbound 11 B 20+ C 21 C Southbound 66 E 74 E 97 F Intersection 27 C 23 C 26 C Central Road / Albert Street A Eastbound (Left) 9 A 11 B 9 A Westbound (Left) 10+ B 10- A 10- A Northbound 29 D 19 C 21 C Southbound 20 C 25- C 15+ C Central Road / Mount Prospect Road Eastbound 54 D' 51 D' 45 D Westbound 24 C 13 B 11 B Northbound 37 D 40 D 42 D' Southbound 19 B 31 C 30 C Intersection 38 D 32 C 33 C Rand Road / Central Road Eastbound 9 A 9 A 9 A Westbound 21 C 26 C 23 C Northbound 53 Dz 51 D3 44 D3 Southbound 10- A 24 C 21 C Intersection 22 C 30 C 25 C * -Signalized Intersection �-Minor-Leg Stop -Controlled Intersection 'Through movement projected to operate at LOS E 31 -eft -turn movement projected to operate at LOS E zLeft-turn movement projected to operate at LOS F L :un° srw a .,ur° Y t �da:atRt tR i i u.,aral II r� ,:„i,.e w a IIA @:]e iy Jani. n/ O ;31 130841�8�( ,3 ” 153 WIN M111M The majority of study intersections are expected to continue operating acceptably at LOS D or better during all peak hours with the addition of projected background traffic and incorporation of the proposed roadway improvements. However, there are a few notable exceptions. At the minor -leg stop -controlled intersection of Rand Road/Henry Street, the eastbound approach is expected to operate at LOS F during the weekday evening and LOS E Saturday midday peak hour. The delay is likely attributable to the increase in north -south traffic along Rand Road, and the associated reduction in gaps to accommodate eastbound traffic. At the signalized intersection of Mount Prospect Road/Rand Road, the overall intersection is projected to operate at LOS C or better during all peak hours, which is an improvement from existing conditions. A minimum LOS C or better is generally maintained for the through movements along Rand Road, consistent with IDOT SRA standards. However, during the morning peak hour, the eastbound approach and through movement is expected to operate at LOS D. The southbound approach is expected to operate at LOS E during the weekday morning and evening peak hours and LOS F during the Saturday midday peak hour. With the proposed redesign of the approach to allow right -turns only, signal priority given to east -west traffic along Rand Road is expected to continue to result in higher levels of delay at the minor -leg approaches of the intersection. At the signalized intersection of Central Road/Mount Prospect Road, the overall intersection and all approaches are projected to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during all peak hours. However, the eastbound through movement is expected to operate at LOS E during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Additionally, the northbound through movement is expected to operate at LOS E during the Saturday midday peak hour. With the proposed improvements and associated retiming, various approaches and movements are expected to operate with different levels of delay from existing conditions. At the signalized intersection of Rand Road/Central Road, the overall intersection is projected to operate acceptably at LOS C or better during all peak hours. However, the northbound approach is expected to operate at LOS D during all peak hours which is inconsistent with IDOT standards for an SRA route. Even with the planned improvements, heavy traffic along Rand Road contributes to higher delay. Additionally, the northbound left -turn movement is projected to operate at LOS F during all peak hours. The projected 95th percentile queue for the northbound left -turn movement is expected to be accommodated within the proposed 235 -foot storage length, during all three peak hours. Ilf"utuiro (2028)III3WIlld Conditions Build traffic projections for Year 2028 were calculated by adding the total site -generated trips (Exhibit 5) to Future (2028) No -Build traffic projections (Exhibit 6). Traffic projections for the Future (2028) Build scenario are illustrated in Exhibit 7. @']e i 9 Jani. pub/ 0::.311 108(E37 154 - - - - INSETA---- - - - - - _ 955 (1335) [1170] o - RAIJ11 R(1p11 N O R T H -0-1__ 1101 N o T TO SCALF 10 (40) [30] Co [12501 (1455) 1130 [251 (15) 20 20 (25) [35] - > 0 HENRY STREET '���co� 10 10 10 - MOM y o [101 (5) 5 — r [ I( 0)10 10 1 oe oS46AS T", 0� 120 (165) [185] 475 (670) [4751 SSS Zjss lasl/� S' IT E ,S104 LEGEND XX Weekday AM Peak CENTRAL ROAD (7:30 — 8:30am) () Weekday PM Peak (4:45 — 5:45pm) [XX] Saturday Midday Peak (11:45am—12:45pm) Existing Signalized Intersection -40- Existing Stop Sign mom Proposed Stop Sign — Less than Five Vehicles Kimley,,)) Horn [25] (25) 30 [180] (175) 125 [755] (830) 920 [6051 (675) 830 [5] (5) 5 [30] (20) 10 O N 0 CENTRAL ROAD �w 's � [505] (545) 625 —� W [2251 (260) 330 N 4 cNn o _ 30 (35) [351 0o 605 (1085) [6851 (15) = [10] co 12 = em —1'r5 WCn 1'1'1 0-) U'e O u [25] (25) 30 [180] (175) 125 [755] (830) 920 [6051 (675) 830 [5] (5) 5 [30] (20) 10 O N 0 560 (870) [570] 95 (135) [105] T r CENTRAL ROAD SEE INSET B - - - iN%4� EXHIBIT 7 FUTURE a M BUILD TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS CENTRAL ROAD 's � [505] (545) 625 —� [2251 (260) 330 4 - f Cl) CID �o = f co 12 = - WCn 1'1'1 0-) U'e O u (� A o 560 (870) [570] 95 (135) [105] T r CENTRAL ROAD SEE INSET B - - - iN%4� EXHIBIT 7 FUTURE a M BUILD TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS WIN It M111M Future Geometry Turn lane warrants were reviewed for the two proposed site access intersections. At Access A along Rand Road, IDOT Bureau of Design and Environment Manual (BDE Manual) volume guidance provided for unsignalized intersections on four -lane facilities (Rand Road has at least a four -lane section in the vicinity of the site) indicate that projected volumes at the intersection do not meet minimum criteria for installation of a dedicated eastbound right -turn lane. Therefore, an eastbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Rand Road/Access A was not assumed in the analysis of future conditions. At Access B along Albert Street, IDOT BDE Manual volume guidance provided for unsignalized intersections on two-lane facilities indicate that projected volumes at the intersection do not meet minimum criteria for installation of a dedicated eastbound left -turn lane or a dedicated westbound right -turn lane. Therefore, these improvements were not assumed in the analysis of future conditions. Access A would be limited to right-in/right-out movements due to the proposed raised median along Rand Road planned with the Village's improvements, with a single inbound lane and a single outbound lane. A "No Left -Turn" sign should be installed to further enhance the movement restrictions. Access B would be a three-quarter access driveway with outbound right -turn movements prohibited. The driveway provide one inbound lane and one outbound left -turn lane. "No Right Turn" signage should be posted for outbound traffic at Access B. Each access driveway would operate under minor -leg stop -control. III°:° tuire (202 8) 1113uilld Capacity Aun lllysiis Based on the traffic projections presented in Exhibit 7, capacity results were identified for the study intersections under Future (2028) Build conditions. The results of the capacity analysis are summarized in Error! Reference source not found.. Consistent with the Future (2028) No -Build analysis, the results of the unsignalized intersections in the study area are based on Synchro's HCM V Edition reports while the results of the signalized intersections are based on Synchro's Lanes, Volumes, and Timings reports. Copies of the Synchro reports are provided in the appendix. @:]e ?I Jami n 0 k3 11 108( E37 156 Table 4.2 Future (2028) Build Levels of Service Henry Street / Albert Street A Westbound (Left) 7 A 7 A 7 A Northbound 9 A 9 A 9 A Rand Road / Henry Street A Eastbound 29 D 71 F 44 E Northbound (Left) 12 B 15- B 13 B Rand Road / Mount Prospect Road Eastbound 36 D 25 C 26 C Westbound 17 B 17 B 20- B Northbound 11 B 21 C 21 C Southbound 66 E 74 E 97 F Intersection 27 C 23 C 26 C Central Road / Albert Street A Eastbound (Left) 9 A 11 B 9 A Westbound (Left) 10+ B 10- A 10- A Northbound 32 D 20 C 22 C Southbound 37 E 95 F 38 E Central Road / Mount Prospect Road �k Eastbound 53 D' 52 D' 45 D Westbound 24 C 13 B 11 B Northbound 36 D 39 D 41 D Southbound 19 B 32 C 31 C Intersection 38 D 32 C 32 C Rand Road / Central Road �k Eastbound 9 A 9 A 9 A Westbound 21 C 26 C 23 C Northbound 53 D2 51 D3 45 D3 Southbound 10+ B 24 C 22 C Intersection 22 C 30 C 25 C Rand Road / Access A Eastbound 15+ C 19 C 17 C Albert Street / Access B Eastbound (Left) 7 A 7 A 7 A Southbound 9 A 9 A 10- A * -Signalized Intersection 0 -Minor -Leg Stop -Controlled Intersection 'Through movement projected to operate at LOS E 31 -eft -turn movement projected to operate at LOS E 21 -eft -turn movement projected to operate at LOS F With the addition of projected site -generated traffic, the majority of study intersections are expected to continue operating similar to no -build conditions during all peak hours with no or slight increases in delay, with one notable exception. The southbound approach at Central Road/Albert Street is expected to operate at LOS E during the weekday morning and Saturday midday peak hours, and @,� Jani. n O ;31 iE30841 �8�( ,3 " 157 WIN It M111M LOS F during the weekday evening peak hour, compared to LOS C during all three peak hours under no -build conditions. This is likely due to exiting site traffic destined for the east on Rand Road and Central Road, south on Mount Prospect Road, and west on Rand Road expected to route to the southbound left -turn movement. The projected delay is not unusual for a minor -leg stop -controlled intersection along a heavily arterial roadway such as Central Road. The 95th percentile queue for the southbound approach is expected to be approximately three vehicles (75 feet) or less during the peak hours, which is not expected to impact any adjacent driveways. The approaches at the proposed site access driveways are expected to operate at LOS C or better with a projected 95th percentile queue of less than one vehicle (25 feet) for outbound movements during all three peak hours. Central Road / Albert Street - Alternate Geometry Per direction from the Village of Mount Prospect, alternate future geometry was considered at the intersection of Central Road/Albert Street. On the north leg (southbound approach), a shared left- turn/through lane and dedicated right -turn lane were considered (compared to the existing single shared lane approach). With the alternate geometry, the intersection would continue to operate under minor -leg stop -control. A summary of the capacity analysis results is presented in Error! Reference source not found. The results of the analysis are based on Synchro's HCM 61h Edition reports, copies of which are included in the appendix. Table 4.3 Future (2028) Build Levels of Service — Alternate Geometry at Central Road I Albert Street Central Road / Albert Street A Eastbound (Left) Westbound (Left) Northbound Southbound 0 -Minor -Leg Stop -Controlled Intersection 'Left -turn movement projected to operate at LOS E 9 A 11 B 9 A 10+ B 10- A 10- A 32 D 20 C 22 C 34 D' 82 F 35 D' In comparison to the existing single shared lane, the alternate geometry (i.e., shared left-turn/through lane and dedicated right -turn lane) would reduce average delay on the southbound approach by approximately three (3) seconds per vehicle during the weekday morning and Saturday midday peak hours. During these periods, the southbound left -turn movement is projected to operate at LOS E. In the weekday evening peak hour, the southbound approach is projected to operate at LOS F, consistent with the results presented in Table 4.2. During each peak hour, the 95th percentile queues on the southbound approach are projected to be approximately two vehicles (50 feet) or less. Therefore, consistent with the capacity analysis results presented in Table 4.2, the projected delay is not expected to materially impact conditions on Albert Street. The alternate geometry was evaluated for the intersection of Central Road/Albert Street based on feedback from the Village. Due to limited change in projected operational conditions and conflicts with @:]e ?3 Jami n 0 k3 11 >1 108( E3 7 158 WIN M111M existing overhead power poles, the alternate geometry is not included in the Recommendations & Conclusions. The intersection should be monitored to determine if two southbound lanes are needed in the future to address delay and queues. @:]e ?,I Jani. n 0::.31E',83>1 I08(E37 159 MIN It M111M 5. SITE REVIEW This section of the report presents a site review which analyzes anticipated parking operations and drive-through operations including queues and site circulation. III°:° ufu ur 11I::Iairlkiing D irn ind In order to evaluate the proposed parking supply, a review of parking demand at existing Raising Cane's restaurants was completed. Parking counts were conducted at the existing Raising Cane's sites in Schaumburg, Illinois (1205 E Higgins Road) and Glen Ellyn, Illinois (499 Roosevelt Road). Kimley-Horn conducted hourly parking occupancy counts at the Schaumburg and Glen Ellyn sites during a typical weekday and Saturday as follows: IMuirsday, August 10, 2021 11:00AIM to 7:0011:::1IM Saturday, August 21, 2021, 11:00AIM to I:00P11M Raising Cane's Schaumburg provides a total parking supply of 43 spaces including 2 ADA spaces. A summary of the observed parking occupancy is provided in Table 5.1. During the weekday, the peak occurred at 6:OOPM with approximately 20 occupied spaces (47 percent). On Saturday, the peak occurred at 2:OOPM with approximately 28 occupied spaces (65 percent). Raising Cane's Glen Ellyn provides a total parking supply of 33 spaces including 2 ADA spaces. A summary of the observed parking occupancy is also provided in Table 5.1. During the weekday, the peak occurred at 1:OOPM with approximately 18 occupied spaces (55 percent). On Saturday, the peak occurred at 1:OOPM with approximately 17 occupied spaces (52 percent). Table 5.1 Observed Parking Occupancy - Raising Cane's Schaumburg & Glen Ellyn The Schaumburg and Glen Ellyn restaurants include approximately 3,575 square feet of gross floor area and 3,707 square feet of gross floor area, respectively. Therefore, the average peak parking @u,,]e ?5 Jammu n 0 k3 11 >1 i08(:137 160 WIN It M111M demand ratio is 5.1 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area on a typical weekday and 6 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area on a typical Saturday. The proposed Raising Cane's Mount Prospect includes 3,661 square feet of gross floor area. The site plan has been configured in coordination with Village staff for desirable access locations and the number of parking stalls has been optimized using the available area on site. A total of 33 spaces is proposed, which meets the local requirement of 33 spaces (12 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area, less any hallways, storage, and bathrooms). Based on data collected at the existing Raising Cane's in Schaumburg and Glen Ellyn, the average number of spaces occupied was not more than 17 spaces on a weekday or Saturday. The peak occupancy observed at the Glen Ellyn site was 18 spaces and 28 spaces at the Schaumburg site, which would be accommodated by the proposed 33 - space supply at the Mount Prospect site. Since the construction of the Schaumburg Raising Cane's, building configurations have changed, providing larger kitchens and smaller dining rooms, which leads to a lower number of customers parking on site and dining in. Therefore, it is expected that the proposed parking demand at the Mount Prospect Raising Cane's would be less than the existing Schaumburg site. Ill iiriiive "'rihiiru 111[)eimain ' Per the Village of Mount Prospect Code of Ordinances, a minimum of eight (8) stacking spaces is required for the first drive-thru window and then two (2) additional stacking spaces for each additional window. Double drive-thru windows are proposed in the site plan; and therefore, a total of ten (10) stacking spaces is required for the proposed restaurant. The proposed redevelopment exceeds the minimum requirements with a total of 26 stacking spaces (14 spaces in the outside lane and 12 spaces in the inside lane). In order to evaluate the proposed drive-thru lane stacking, observations were conducted at Raising Cane's Schaumburg and Raising Cane's Glen Ellyn. During observations, the maximum queue was recorded at one (1) minute intervals. The observations were completed concurrent with the parking utilization counts as follows: IFhuursday, August 10, 2021 11:00AM 10 7:00RIM Saturday, August 21, 2021, 11:00AlM to T:OOPIIM A summary of the drive-through observations is presented in Table 5.2. @u,,]e Jaruu.s un/ 0::.3 11 108((37 161 WIN It M111M Table 5.2 Drive-Thru Observations - Raising Cane's Schaumburg & Glen Ellyn Schaumburg Average _ 7 10* Maximum 21 I_ 25* 95th Percentile 14 21* Glen Ellyn Average 5 4 I Maximum 15 _ I_ 10 95th Percentile 12 7 Data obtained after 4:00PM on Saturday, August 21, 2021 was omitted from the study due to closure of the dine -in area During the weekday, a maximum queue of 21 and 15 vehicles was observed at the Schaumburg and Glen Ellyn restaurants, respectively. During Saturday, a maximum queue of 10 vehicles was observed at the Glen Ellyn restaurant. At Schaumburg, the dine -area area was closed at 4:OOPM which resulted in an increase in drive-through activity. Prior to closure of the dine -in area, the maximum observed queue was 25 vehicles (1:45PM). For both existing restaurants, an average of 10 vehicles or less was observed. The maximum queue conditions represent periods when vehicles arrived in groups or platoons; throughout most of the observation periods, drive-thru vehicle arrivals were staggered. Based on observations conducted at the existing Raising Cane's restaurants, the proposed drive-thru window stacking is expected to accommodate demand without impacting site access, internal circulation, or parking maneuvers. Queue spillback to Albert Street or Rand Road is not anticipated. @:]e Jami n 0 k3 11 >1 i08(:137 162 WIN It M111M Based on Kimley-Horn's review of the proposed site plan and evaluation of existing and future traffic conditions, the study intersections are projected to adequately accommodate the proposed redevelopment. The roadway improvements planned by others are expected to accommodate turning movements. Additional improvements to accommodate site -generated traffic were not identified in the analysis of Future (2028) Build conditions. The intersection of Central Road/Albert Street should be monitored in order to determine if two southbound lanes are needed in the future to address delay and queues. At the right-in/right-out access to Rand Road (Access A), "No Left Turn" signage should be posted for outbound traffic. The driveway to Albert Street (Access B) would be limited to three-quarter access with outbound right -turn movements prohibited; outbound traffic would travel southbound to Central Road. "No Right Turn" signage should be posted for outbound traffic at Access B. Minor -leg stop control, including stop signs and stop bars, should be posted for outbound traffic at each of the site driveways. A review of comparable local Raising Cane's facilities indicates that the proposed parking supply and drive-through stacking provided onsite will adequately accommodate proposed operations. Spillback from parking or the drive-through is not expected on adjacent roadways. Regardless of the final configuration of the intersection geometrics, several additional items should be taken into consideration when preparing site and roadway improvement plans for the subject development. As the site design progresses, care should be taken with landscaping, signage, and monumentation at the site access locations to ensure that adequate horizontal sight distance is provided from the new stop bars. If alterations to the site plan or land use should occur, changes to the analysis provided within this traffic impact study may be needed. @:]e ? Jani. n 0 k311 E'„831 108( u,37 163 WIN M111M Conceptual Site Plan Traffic Count Data Existing (2022) Capacity Reports Data from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Data from the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition Planned Roadway Improvements Future (2028) No -Build Capacity Reports Future (2028) Build Capacity Reports Future (2028) Build Capacity Reports — Alternate Geometry for Central Road / Albert Street t a: sing C::mY&,teMa ar ent NkN.,m II ���,:„I,.e w�a IIA @:]e Jam n 0::.3 11 108(E37 164 WIN millm CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Jani. n O ;3 11E308; 1�8�("u," " 165 E. RAND ROAD -, �o S) t tv BOG ti .1 IANFS ErE eaz eo �� � 1. L,= �'• -_ N. ALBERT STREET L3 e .y 1 Aa �' / '4D' ` t o r� P� 1 SITE ANALYSIS TABLE rs s LEGEND RAISING CANE'S RESTAURANT -15 E. RAND ROAD MOUNTPROSPECT, IF 600 =ROTOTYPE 6E V AV STORE #RC968 FOR REVIEW ONLY t wmley*Horn PLAN _anTE 12'2112022 KH JOB NO 168418037 "u"oN %V t v BENCHMARKS C5.0 SHEET NQ DE SITE KEYNOTE A rev i PLAN _anTE 12'2112022 8e/ore E "u"oN %V t v +08'�O. C5.0 SHEET NQ millmWIN TRAFFIC COUNT DATA Jani. n O ;3 11E308; 1�8�("u," " 167 01 -Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979468, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 Leg Henry Henry Albert Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Time T R U App Ped* L T U App Ped* L R U App Ped" Int 2022-08-25 7:OOAM 4 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 1 8 7:15AM 7 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 11 7:30AM 3 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 3 1 9 7:45AM 2 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 8 Homily Total 16 1 0 17 0 2 9 0 11 0 5 3 0 8 2 36 8:00AM 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 2 0 6 0 12 8:15AM 1 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 4 1. 8 8:30AM 4 0 0 4 0 2 6 0 8 0 2 3 0 5 0 17 8:45AM 5 1 0 6 0 0 4 0 4 0 1 1 1 3 0 13 Hourly Total 13 3 0 16 0 2 14 0 16 0 9 8 1 18 1 50 4:OOPM 2 0 0 2 0 0 14 0 14 0 5 0 0 5 0 21 4:15PM 2 1 0 3 0 1 13 0 14 0 9 0 0 9 0 26 4:30PM 5 0 0 5 0 1 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 0 15 4:45PM 1 2 0 3 0 1 14 0 15 0 9 2 0 11 1 29 Hourly Total 10 3 0 13 0 3 49 0 52 0 24 2 0 26 1 91 5:OOPM 4 2 0 6 0 0 10 0 10 0 5 0 0 5 1 21 5:15PM 2 0 0 2 0 1 6 0 7 0 4 0 0 4 0 13 5:30PM 4 0 2 6 0 1 12 0 13 0 7 0 0 7 0 26 5:45PM 3 0 0 3 1 2 13 0 15 0 5 1 0 6 0 24 Hourly Total 13 2 2 17 1 4 41 0 45 0 21 1 0 22 1 84 Total 52 9 2 63 1 11 113 0 124 0 59 14 1 74 5 261 %Approach 82.5% 14.3% 3.2% - 8.9% 91.1% 0% - 79.7% 18.9% 1.4% - %Total 19.9% 3.4% 0.8% 24.1% 4.2% 43.3% 0% 47.5% 22.6% 5.4% 0.4% 28.4% Lights 51 7 2 60 11 109 0 120 55 14 1 70 250 % Lights 98.1% 77.8% 100% 95.2% 100% 96.5% 0% 96.8% 93.2% 100% 100% 94.6% 95.8% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 3 8 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1.9% 22.2% 0% 4-89A 0% 1.8% 0% 1.6% 5.1% 0% 0% 4.1% 3.1% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 3 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.8% 0% 1.6% 1.7% 0% 0% 1-4% 1.1% Pedesrrlans 1 0 4 % Pede'Wans _ _ _ _ 100% _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 80.01Y. Bicycle, on Crosswalk---- 0---- 0---- 1 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - 0% 20.0%1 1 :r. Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: ll_eft, R: Ri ht, T: Thrtu, u.Jo U. -Turn 168 01 -Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979468, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 0 4 �rrni<�A�Dk°,� rn 1* Ln r -A Out: 21 In: 74 Total: 95 [S] Albert 169 i O M N IQ•1611�NINIIIDII�uay��aii f6 2LO IIIIIIIIliYll17B8U!� ~ 5 2 N c 9 IIIIDIDI IIIIIDIINDlll 0 4 �rrni<�A�Dk°,� rn 1* Ln r -A Out: 21 In: 74 Total: 95 [S] Albert 169 01_Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 ri ALT HAMILTON Forced Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) mij ' EWLO I ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979468, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 Leg Henry Henry Albert Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Time T R U App Ped* L T U App Ped* L R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 7:30AM 3 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 3 1 9 7:45AM 2 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 8 8:OOAM 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 2 0 6 0 12 8:15AM 1 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 4 1 8 Total 9 3 0 12 0 1 10 0 11 0 8 6 0 14 2 37 %Approach 75.0% 25.0% 0% - 9.1% 90.9% 0% - 57.1% 42.9% 0% - %Total 24.3% 8.1% 0% 32.49/6 2.7% 27.0% 0% 29.71A 21.6% 16.2% 0% 37.8% - PHF 0.750 0.375 - 0.750 0.250 0.500 - 0.550 0.438 0.750 - 0.542 0.750 Lights 8 2 0 10 1 8 0 9 7 6 0 13 32 %Lights 88.9% 66.7% 0% 83.3% 100% 80.0% 0% 81.81A 87.5% 100% 0% 92.9% 86.5% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 11.1% 33.3% 0% 16.7% 0% 20.0% 0% 18.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10.8% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 12.5% 0% 0% 7.1% 2.7% Pedestrians _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ _ 1 % Pedeslri is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 50.0% Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 50.0% Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. I_,: Left, R. Right,'7C: Thrta, QJ: LJ-Tt.irn 170 01 -Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979468, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 0 2 "'W co Out: 4 In: 14 Total: 18 [S] Albert 10 171 00 � C) O M r6 ?� O 9 u 3 0 2 "'W co Out: 4 In: 14 Total: 18 [S] Albert 10 171 01_Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 ri ALT HAMILTON Forced Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) mij ' EWLO I ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979468, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 Leg Henry Henry Albert Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Time T R U App Ped* L T U App Ped'* L R U App Ped' Int 2022-08-25 4:45PM 1 2 0 3 0 1 14 0 15 0 9 2 0 11 1 29 5:00PM 4 2 0 6 0 0 10 0 10 0 5 0 0 5 1 21 5:15PM 2 0 0 2 0 1 6 0 7 0 4 0 0 4 0 13 5:30PM 4 0 2 6 0 1 12 0 13 0 7 0 0 7 0 26 Total 11 4 2 17 0 3 42 0 45 0 25 2 0 27 2 89 %Approach 64.7% 23.5°/% 11.8% - 6.7% 93.3% 0% - 92.6% 7.4% 0% - %Total 12.4% 4.5% 2.2% 19.1% 3.4% 47.2% 0% 50.61A 28.1% 2.2% 0% 30.3% - PHF 0.688 0.500 0.250 0.708 0.750 0.714 - 0.717 0.694 0.250 - 0.614 0.750 Lights 11 4 2 17 3 40 0 43 25 2 0 27 87 % Lights 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95.2% 0% 95.61A 100% 100% 0% 100% 97.8% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 00A 0% 4.8% 0% 4.4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.2% Pedestrians 0 0 2 `%, Pedestrians 100'!o Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. I_,: Left, R: Right,'7C: "]Clara, QJ: U-Tr:mi 172 01 -Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979468, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 0 42 2 LPI N N Out: 7 In: 27 Total: 34 [S] Albert 173 rn �+ O i �00 t.0 N . _u 2 0 ?� � 11 4 0 42 2 LPI N N Out: 7 In: 27 Total: 34 [S] Albert 173 02 -Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979467, Location: 42.068122, -87.924072 Leg Henry Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Northbound Southbound Time L R U App Fred* L T U App Fred* T R U App Ped* lot 2022-08-25 7:OOAM 0 3 1 4 0 1 160 0 161 0 253 0 0 253 0 418 7:15AM 0 7 0 7 1 1 172 0 173 0 278 1 0 279 0 459 7:30AM 1 5 0 6 1 1 215 1 217 0 273 0 0 273 0 496 7:45AM 1 1 0 2 0 4 236 0 240 0 259 1 0 260 0 502 Homily Total 2 16 1 19 2 7 783 1 791 0 1063 2 0 1065 0 1875 8:OOAM 1 4 0 5 0 4 226 0 230 0 267 0 0 267 0 502 8:15AM 0 2 0 2 0 1 208 0 209 0 266 0 0 266 0 477 8:30AM 2 5 0 7 0 6 226 0 232 0 241 2 0 243 0 482 8:45AM 1 5 0 6 0 2 222 0 224 0 232 3 0 235 0 465 Hourly Total 4 16 0 20 0 13 882 0 895 0 1006 5 0 1011 0 1926 4:OOPM 1 1 0 2 0 11 275 0 286 0 281 1 0 282 0 570 4:15PM 0 1 0 1 1 11 288 0 299 0 274 4 0 278 0 578 4:30PM 0 5 0 5 0 6 266 0 272 0 286 3 0 289 0 566 4:45PM 2 1 0 3 2 14 344 0 358 0 284 2 0 286 0 647 Hourly Total 3 8 0 11 3 42 1173 0 1215 0 1125 10 0 1135 0 2361 5:OOPM 2 1 0 3 0 8 280 0 288 0 343 1 0 344 0 635 5:15PM 0 2 0 2 0 7 297 0 304 0 307 0 0 307 0 613 5:30PM 0 4 0 4 0 6 340 0 346 0 327 4 0 331 0 681 5:45PM 1 4 0 5 0 13 272 0 285 0 280 2 0 282 0 572 Hourly Total 3 11 0 14 0 34 1189 0 1223 0 1257 7 0 1264 0 2501 Total 12 51 1 64 5 96 4027 1 4124 0 4451 24 0 4475 0 8663 %Approach 18.8% 79.7% 1.6% - 2.3% 97.6% 0% - 99.5% 0.5% 0% - %Total 0.1% 0.6% 0% 0.70/. 1.1% 46.5% 0% 47.6% 51.4% 0.3% 0% 51.7% Lights 11 50 1 62 95 3940 1 4036 4362 22 0 4384 8482 % Lights 91.7% 98.0% 100% 96.90/. 99.0% 97.8% 100% 97.9% 98.0% 91.7% 0% 98.0% 97.9% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 1 0 25 0 25 21 0 0 21 47 % Articulated Trucks 0% 2.0% 0% 1.6% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.6% 0.5% 0% 0% 0.5% 0.5% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1 0 0 1 1 62 0 63 68 2 0 70 134 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 8.3% 0% 0% 1.60A 1.0% 1.5% 0% 1.5% 1.5% 8.3% 0% 1.6% 1.5% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 3 0 0 %Pedestrians 60.0% Bicycles on Crosswalk---- 2---- 0---- 0 %Lxicycles on Crosswal!LL - - - - 40.0% - - - - - - - - oPedestriatns and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: ll_efl<, R: Right,']": ThrLt, l.Jo U. -Turn 174 02 -Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979467, Location: 42.068122, -87.924072 [N]Rand Total: 8514 In: 4475 Out: 4039 � Ln N Out: 4503 In: 4124 Total: 8627 [S] Rand 0 175 N N rl L 00 ::, N O _ � 1 `O 51 u [N]Rand Total: 8514 In: 4475 Out: 4039 � Ln N Out: 4503 In: 4124 Total: 8627 [S] Rand 0 175 02_Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 ri ALT HAMILTON AM Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM)LO I ASSOCIATES, INC.mij ' EW All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979467, Location: 42.068122, -87.924072 Leg Henry Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Northbound Southbound Time L R U App Ped" L T U App Ped" T R U App Ped' Int 2022-08-25 7:30AM 1 5 0 6 1 1 215 1 217 0 273 0 0 273 0 496 7:45AM 1 1 0 2 0 4 236 0 240 0 259 1 0 260 0 502 8:OOAM 1 4 0 5 0 4 226 0 230 0 267 0 0 267 0 502 8:15AM 0 2 0 2 0 1 208 0 209 0 266 0 0 266 0 477 Total 3 12 0 15 1 10 885 1 896 0 1065 1 0 1066 0 1977 %Approach 20.0% 80.0°/% 0% - 1.1% 98.8% 0.1% - 99.9% 0.1% 0% - %Total 0.2% 0.6% 0% 0.8% 0.5% 44.8% 0.1% 45.31A 53.9% 0.1% 0% 53.9% PIIF 0.750 0.600 - 0.625 0.625 0.938 0.250 0.933 0.975 0.250 - 0.976 0.985 Lights 2 11 0 13 9 844 1 854 1036 0 0 1036 1903 % Lights 66.7% 91.7% 0% 86.7% 90.0% 95.4% 100% 95.31A 97.3% 0% 0% 97.2% 96.3% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 10 9 0 0 9 20 % Articulated Trucks 0% 8.3% 0% 6.7% 0% 1.1% 0% 1.1% 0.8% 0% 0% 0.8% 1.0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1 0 0 1 1 31 0 32 20 1 0 21 54 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 33.3% 0% 0% 6.7% 10.0% 3.5% 0% 3.6% 1.9% 100% 0% 2.0% 2.7% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Pedestrian; 1 0 0 % Pedesirlans 1.00% Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 01 0 `%a Bicycles on Crosswalk _ _ _ _ 0% Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. I_,: Left, R. Right, '7C: Th t.t, QJ: LJ-Tt.irn 176 02 -Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 AM Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979467, Location: 42.068122, -87.924072 3 12 14 [N]Rand Total: 1954 In: 1066 Out: 888 Ln 0 r-io Ln r -I 00 00 Out: 1078 In: 896 Total: 1974 [S] Rand 0 177 02_Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 ri ALT HAMILTON PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak HourLO I ASSOCIATES, INC . mij ' EW All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979467, Location: 42.068122, -87.924072 Leg Henry Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Northbound Southbound Time L R U App Ped* L T U App Ped* T R U App Ped' Int 2022-08-25 4:45PM 2 1 0 3 2 14 344 0 358 0 284 2 0 286 0 647 S:OOPM 2 1 0 3 0 8 280 0 288 0 343 1 0 344 0 635 5:15PM 0 2 0 2 0 7 297 0 304 0 307 0 0 307 0 613 5:30PM 0 4 0 4 0 6 340 0 346 0 327 4 0 331 0 681 Total 4 8 0 12 2 35 1261 0 1296 0 1261 7 0 1268 0 2576 %Approach 33.3% 66.7% 0% - 2.7% 97.3°/% 0% - 99.4% 0.6% 0% - %Total 0.2% 0.3% 0% 0.5% 1.4% 49.0°/% 0% 50.3% 49.0% 0.3% 0% 49.2% PHF 0.500 0.500 - 0.750 0.625 0.916 - 0.905 0.919 0.438 - 0.922 0.946 Lights 4 8 0 12 35 1251 0 1286 1250 7 0 1257 2555 % Lights 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 99.2% 0% 99.2% 99.1% 100% 0% 99.1% 99.2% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 3 4 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0% 0.1% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% 0.2% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 8 0 0 8 17 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.7% 0% 0.7% 0.6% 0% 0% 0.6% 0.7% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 00/0 0% Pedestrians _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ 0 0 % Pedestrians _ _ _ .- 50.0`/0 Bicycles on Crosswalk 1 0 0 % Bicyeles on Crosswalk 50.0% Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. I_,: Left, R. Right, '7C: Th t.t, QJ: LJ-Tt.irn 178 02 -Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979467, Location: 42.068122, -87.924072 N.. [N]Rand Total: 2533 In: 1268 Out: 1265 N N r-1 0111111111 IN LC1 -1 m Qo N r1 Out: 1269 In: 1296 Total: 2565 [S] Rand 0 179 03 -Rand Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979463, Location: 42.066967, -87.922157 Leg Rand Rand Mount Prospect Mount Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped" L T R U App 1'ed" L T R U App Ped" L T R U App Ped' Int 2022-08-25 7:OOAM 2 200 52 0 254 0 0 123 4 0 127 0 46 9 0 0 55 0 1 5 1 0 7 0 443 7:15AM 5 212 48 0 265 0 0 105 5 0 110 0 62 5 0 0 67 0 5 4 1 0 10 0 452 7:30AM 7 230 57 0 294 0 0 148 5 0 153 0 67 4 0 0 71 p 3 8 2 0 13 0 531 7:45AM 3 207 55 0 265 0 0 164 11 0 175 1 73 9 0 0 82 0 8 6 3 0 17 0 539 Hourly Total 17 849 212 0 1078 0 0 540 25 0 565 1 248 27 0 0 275 0 17 23 7 0 47 0 1965 8:OOAM 3 201 56 0 260 0 0 153 8 0 161 0 74 12 0 0 86 0 4 4 3 0 11 0 518 8:15AM 6 201 60 1 268 0 0 129 11 0 140 1 75 9 0 0 84 0 9 11 4 0 24 0 516 8:30AM 12 188 52 0 252 0 0 145 2 0 147 0 65 15 O 0 80 0 4 6 11 0 21 0 500 8:45AM 12 177 47 0 236 0 0 154 21 0 175 0 68 18 0 0 86 0 8 14 11 0 33 0 530 Hourly Total 33 767 215 1 1016 0 0 581 42 0 623 1 282 54 0 0 336 0 25 35 29 0 89 0 2064 4:OOPM 24 168 85 1 278 0 0 200 19 0 219 0 58 33 0 0 91 0 25 21 25 0 71 0 659 4:15PM 15 139 102 0 256 0 0 189 29 0 218 0 91 31 0 0 122 1. 15 39 19 0 73 0 669 4:30PM 17 173 99 0 289 0 0 176 44 0 220 0 62 34 0 0 96 0 22 32 27 0 81 0 686 4:45PM 14 176 110 0 300 0 0 255 30 0 285 0 96 33 0 0 129 0 19 31 17 0 67 0 781 Hourly Total 70 656 396 1 1123 0 0 820 122 0 942 0 307 131 0 0 438 1 81 123 88 0 292 0 2795 5:OOPM 13 191 109 0 313 2 0 185 24 0 209 0 76 28 0 0 104 0 29 44 18 0 91 0 717 5:15PM 21 178 123 0 322 0 0 190 23 0 213 0 97 35 0 0 132 0 26 41 17 0 84 0 751 5:30PM 22 193 94 0 309 0 0 222 21 0 243 0 94 34 0 0 128 0 25 32 21 0 78 0 758 5:45PM 17 189 86 0 292 0 0 184 27 0 211 O 65 42 0 0 107 0 19 27 25 0 71 0 681 Hourly Total 73 751 412 0 1236 2 0 781 95 0 876 0 332 139 0 0 471 0 99 144 81 0 324 0 2907 Total 193 3023 1235 2 4453 2 0 2722 284 0 3006 2 1169 351 0 0 1520 1 222 325 205 0 752 0 9731 % Approach 4.3% 67.9% 27.7% 0% - 0%90.6% 9.4%0% - ..76.9% 23.1% 0% 0% - 29.5% 43.2% 27.3% 0% - %Total 2.0% 31.1% 12.7% 0%45.8% l)% 28.0% 2.9% 0% 30.9% 12.0% 3.6% 0% 0% 15.6% 2.3% 3.3% 2.1% 0% 7.7% Lights 192 2976 1199 2 4369 0 2673 282 0 2955 1125 346 0 0 1471 219 320 204 0 743 9538 %Lights 99.5% 98.4% 97.1% 100% 98.1% 0% 98.2% 99.3% 0% 98.3% 96.2% 98.6% 0% 0% 96.80/. 98.6% 98.5% 99.5% 0% 98.8% ..98.0% Articulated Tracks 0 11 10 0 21 0 11 0 0 11 13 2 0 0 15 1 3 0 0 4 51 %Articulated Trucks 0% 0.4% 0.8% 0% 0.5% 0% 0.4% 0%0% 0.40/. 1.1% 0.6% 0%0% 1.0"/n 0.5% 0.9% 0%0% 0.5% 0.5% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1 36 26 0 63 0 37 2 0 39 30 3 0 0 33 2 2 1 0 5 140 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0.5% 1.2% 2.1% 0% 1.4% 0% 1.4% 0.7%0% 1.3%- 2.6% 0.9% 0%0% 2.2%- 0.9% 0.6% 0.5% 0% 0.7"/n- 1.4% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 01/. 0.1% 0%0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 2 0 0 % Pedestrians 0% 100% 0% Bicycles on t, rosswa k �- �- �- �- �- 2 0 1 0 Bicycles on Crosswalk -100% 0% - - - -100% Pedestrians and Bicycles out Crosswalk L: Left, R: Right Tbrt1, U: U-TkIrn 180 03 -Rand Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979463, Location: 42.066967, -87.922157 1235 [N] Mount Prospect Total: 1580 In: 752 Out: 828 Ln Ln N O N N N M N rn -1 �.b Ln -i M Out: 1560 In: 1520 Total: 3080 [S] Mount Prospect 284 2722 a -J D O 181 0 rn 0 O Ln c6 ty Ln CO —, (D 2 ?� 0 193 M Ln 'T 3023 c 1235 [N] Mount Prospect Total: 1580 In: 752 Out: 828 Ln Ln N O N N N M N rn -1 �.b Ln -i M Out: 1560 In: 1520 Total: 3080 [S] Mount Prospect 284 2722 a -J D O 181 03_Rand Road &Mount Prospect Road -TMC GEWALT HAMILTON Thu Aug 25, 2022 AM Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979463, Location: 42.066967, -87.922157 Leg Rand Rand Mount Prospect Mount Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped'* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 7:30AM 7 230 57 0 294 0 0 148 5 0 153 0 67 4 0 0 71 0 3 8 2 0 13 0 531 7:45AM 3 207 55 0 265 0 0 164 11 0 175 1 73 9 0 0 82 0 8 6 3 0 17 0 539 8:OOAM 3 201 56 0 260 0 0 153 8 0 161 0 74 12 0 0 86 0 4 4 3 0 11 0 518 8:15AM 6 201 60 1 268 0 0 129 11 0 140 1 75 9 0 0 84 0 9 11 4 0 24 0 516 Total 19 839 228 1 1087 O 0 594 35 0 629 2 289 34 0 0 323 0 24 29 12 0 65 O 2104 % Approach 1.7% 77.2% 21.0% 0.1% - ..0%94.4% 5.6%0% - 89.5% 10.5% 0% 0% - ..36.9% 44.6% 18.5% 0% - %Total 0.9% 39.9% 10.8% 0%51.7% ..0%28.2% 1.7% 0% 29.9% 13.7% 1.6% 0% 0% 15.4% 1.1% 1.4% 0.6%0% 3.1% PIIF 0.679 0.912 0.950 0.250 0.924 - 0.905 0.795 - 0.899 0.963 0.708 - - 0.039 0.667 0.659 0.750 - 0.677 0.976 Lights 18 828 214 1 1061 0 570 33 0 603 269 32 0 0 301 23 24 12 0 59 2024 % Lights 94.7% 98.7% 93.9% 100% 97.6% 0% 96.0% 94.3% 0% 95.9% 93.1% 94.1% 0% 0% 93.2% 95.8% 82.8% 100% 0% 90.8% ..96.2%1 Articulated Trucks 0 3 4 0 7 0 4 0 0 4 7 1 0 0 8 0 3 0 0 3 22 %Articulated Trucks 0% 0.4% 1.8% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.7% 0%0% 0.61/. 2.4% 2.9% 0%0% 2.5% 0%10,3% 0%0% 4.6% 1.0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1 8 10 0 19 0 20 2 0 22 13 1 0 0 14 1 2 0 0 3 58 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 5.3% 1.0% 4.4% 0% 1.7% 0% 3.4% 5.7%0% 3.5% 4.5% 2.9% 0%0% 4.3% 4.2% 6.9% 0%0% 4.6% 2.8% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0%0%01/. 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians O 2 0 0 % Pedestrians 100% Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 O 0 0 0, Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right,'T' Thrt.i, UJ: tJ-Tu11rn 182 03 -Rand Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 AM Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979463, Location: 42.066967, -87.922157 228 [N] Mount Prospect Total: 153 In: 65 Out: 88 NO» -i Out: 257 In: 323 Total: 580 [S] Mount Prospect 35 594 D O 183 rn 00 M O 00 (6 � 4,1 o 19 H 00 0 839 c 228 [N] Mount Prospect Total: 153 In: 65 Out: 88 NO» -i Out: 257 In: 323 Total: 580 [S] Mount Prospect 35 594 D O 183 03_Rand Road &Mount Prospect Road -TMC GEWALT HAMILTON Thu Aug 25, 2022 PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979463, Location: 42.066967, -87.922157 Leg Rand Rand Mount Prospect Mount Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Pert* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 4:45PM 14 176 110 0 300 0 0 255 30 0 285 0 96 33 0 0 129 0 19 31 17 0 67 0 781 S:OOPM 13 191 109 0 313 2 0 185 24 0 209 0 76 28 0 0 104 0 29 44 18 0 91 0 717 5:15PM 21 178 123 0 322 0 0 190 23 0 213 0 97 35 0 0 132 0 26 41 17 0 84 0 751 5:30PM 22 193 94 0 309 0 0 222 21 0 243 0 94 34 0 0 128 0 25 32 21 0 78 0 758 Total 70 738 436 0 1244 2 0 852 98 0 950 0 363 130 0 0 493 0 99 148 73 0 320 0 3007 %Approach 5.6% 59.3% 35.0% 0% - 0% 89.7% 10.3% 0% - 73.6% 26.4% 0% 0% - 30.9% 46.3% 22.8% 0% - %Total 2.3% 24.5% 14.5% 0% 41.41/6 0%28.3% 3.3% 0% 31.6% 12.1% 4.3% 0% 0% 16.4% 3.3% 4.9% 2.4% 0% 10.696 PHF 0.795 0.956 0.886 - 0.966 - 0.835 0.817 - 0-833 0.936 0.929 - - 0.934 0.853 0.841 0.869 - 0.879 0.963 Lights 70 728 435 0 1233 0 848 98 0 946 358 129 0 0 487 98 148 72 0 318 2984 % Lights 100% 98.6% 99.8% 0% 99.1% 0%99.5% 100% 0%99.6% 98.6% 99.2% 0% 0% 98.8% 99.0% 100% 98.6% 0% 99.4% 99.2% Articulated Trucks 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.4% 0.2%0% 0.31/o 0% 0% 0%0% 01/. 0% 0%0%0% 0% 1.0% 0% 0%0% 0.3% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 7 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 18 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0.9% 0%0% 0.6% 0% 0.5% 0%0% 0.4% 1.4% 0.8%0%0% 1.2% 0% 0% 1.4%0% 0.3% 0.6% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0%0% 0% D% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 % Pec:lestrians 0°!0 Bicycles on Crosswalk 2 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 100°!, *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: light, 7[': 1['hrij, IJ: U-Tuirn 184 03 -Rand Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979463, Location: 42.066967, -87.922157 [N] Mount Prospect Total: 618 In: 320 Out: 298 M CO rn 1 rn M o �.o m m -1 Out: 584 In: 493 Total: 1077 [S] Mount Prospect M 852 C I� 00 rn O W 00 u O 185 00 00 N rl 7 N O (6 M Ln t N —, ro 70 O N 738 436 [N] Mount Prospect Total: 618 In: 320 Out: 298 M CO rn 1 rn M o �.o m m -1 Out: 584 In: 493 Total: 1077 [S] Mount Prospect M 852 C I� 00 rn O W 00 u O 185 04 -Central Road & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979466, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 I r � Leg Central Central Albert Albert Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped*' L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped" L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 7:OOAM 1 193 1 0 195 1 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 297 7:15AM 2 282 0 0 284 0 2 89 0 0 91 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 383 7:30AM 2 232 0 0 234 0 0 151 1 0 152 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 6 0 7 0 397 7:45AM 1 235 1 0 237 0 2 148 0 0 150 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 390 Hourly Total 6 942 2 0 950 1 4 485 1 0 490 0 4 1 9 0 14 1 3 0 10 0 13 0 1467 8:OOAM 4 218 1 0 223 0 1 170 1 0 172 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 400 8:15AM 1 215 1 0 217 0 1 136 1 0 138 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 361 8:30AM 3 221 0 0 224 0 1 149 3 0 153 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 383 8:45AM 3 157 0 0 160 0 0 140 2 0 142 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 1 0 6 0 7 0 313 Hourly Total 11 811 2 0 824 0 3 595 7 0 605 0 3 0 10 0 13 0 2 2 11 0 15 0 1457 4:OOPM 7 194 0 0 201 0 0 240 2 0 242 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 449 4:15PM 3 153 1 0 157 0 2 212 1 0 215 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 381 4:30PM 3 186 2 0 191 0 2 262 0 0 264 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 462 4:45PM 5 191 1 0 197 0 4 231 4 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 6 0 442 Hourly Total 18 724 4 0 746 0 8 945 7 0 960 0 2 0 7 0 9 2 4 0 15 0 19 0 1734 5:OOPM 3 179 1 0 183 0 5 288 2 0 295 0 0 1 6 0 7 1 1 0 3 0 4 0 489 5:15PM 1 231 4 0 236 0 3 276 1 0 280 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 520 5:30PM 5 218 0 0 223 0 1 263 6 0 270 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 502 5:45PM 3 203 0 0 206 0 1 229 4 0 234 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 445 Hourly Total 12 831 5 0 848 0 10 1056 13 0 1079 0 2 1 15 0 18 1 1 1 9 0 11 0 1956 Total 47 3308 13 0 3368 1 25 3081 28 0 3134 0 11 2 41 0 54 4 10 3 45 0 58 0 6614 %Approach 1.4%98.2% 0.4%0% - 0.8% 98.3% 0.9%0% - ..20.4% 3.7% 75.9% 0% - 17.2% 5.2% 77.6% 0% - % Total 0.7%50.0% 0.2%0%50.9% - 0.4%46.6% 0.4% 0% 47.4% - 0.2% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.8% - 0.2% 0% 0.7% 0% 0.9% - Lights 44 3250 12 0 3306 25 3030 27 0 3082 10 2 39 0 51 10 3 42 0 55 6494 % Lights 93.6% 98.2% 92.3% 0% 98.2% - 100% 98.3% 96.4% 0% 98.3% 90.9% 100% 95.1% 0% 94.49/6 - 100% 100% 93.3% 0% 94.8% ..98.2% Articulated Trucks 0 17 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.5% 0%0% 0.5% 0% 0.6% 0%0% 0.5% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% O% 0.5% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 3 40 0 0 43 0 32 1 0 33 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 81 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 6.4% 1.2% 0%0% 1.3% 0% 1.0% 3.6%0% 1.1% 9.1% 0% 4.9%0% 5.6% 0% 0% 4.4%0% 3.4% 1.2% Bicycles on Road 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 7.7% 0% 0.1% 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 2.2% 0% 1.7% 0.1% 1'edestcians 1 0 3 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - 100% - - - - - - - - - ..75.0% '- Mr yule"' on crosswalk 0 0 1 0 °la Bicycles on Crosswalk----- 0%,---------- 25.0% ----- Pedestrians and .Bicycles on Crosswalk. L- Lehi,, R: Right, .Q':'I"hnt, QJ: U.J-Tkjrn 186 04 -Central Road & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979466, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 r - M M Ln O 4-, o un v � Ufu -- 4-' o 00 u �0 M M C 47 3308 13 [N] Albert Total: 135 In: 58 Out: 77 Lnmo �M,i r-1 N r1 r -I lzt Out: 41 In: 54 Total: 95 [S] Albert 28 M 3081 m c —M rn 25 4� U o � � W Ln u M M a� 7 O 187 04_Central Road &Albert Street -TMC GEWALT MMILTON Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) ASSOCIATES, (N C. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979466, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 Leg Central Central Albert Albert Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped'* Int 2022-08-25 7:30AM 2 232 0 0 234 0 0 151 1 0 152 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 6 0 7 0 397 7:45AM 1 235 1 0 237 0 2 148 0 0 150 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 390 8:00AM 4 218 1 0 223 0 1 170 1 0 172 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 400 8:15AM 1 215 1 0 217 0 1 136 1 0 138 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 361 Total 8 900 3 0 911 0 4 605 3 0 612 0 6 0 6 0 12 0 3 1 9 0 13 0 1548 % Approach 0.9%98.8% 0.3°% 0% - 0.7%98.9% 0.5%0% - 50.0% 0% 50.0% 0% - 23.1% 7.7% 69.2% 0% - % Total 0.5% 58.1% 0.2% 0% 58.9% 0.3% 39.1% 0.2% 0% 39.5% 0.4%0% 0.4%0% 0.8% 0.2% 0.1% 0.6%0% 0.8% PHF 0.500 0.957 0.750 - 0.961 0.500 0.890 0.750 - 0.890 0.500 - 0.500 -0.750 0.750 0.250 0.375 - 0.464 0.968 Lights 7 879 3 0 889 4 590 3 0 597 6 0 6 0 12 3 1 8 0 12 1510 % Lights 87.5% 97.7% 100% 0% 97.6°% 100% 97.5°% 100% 0% 97.5% 100%0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100°% 88.9% 0% 92.3% 97.5% Articulated Trucks 0 4 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.4% 0%0% 0.4% 0% 1.0% 0%0% 1.0% 0%0% 0%0% 00% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% - 0.6% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1 17 0 0 18 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 28 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 12.5% 1.9% 0%0% 2.0°% 0% 1.5% 0%0% 1.5°% 0%0% 0%0% 0°% 0% 0%11.1%0% 7.7% 1.8% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0%0% 0°% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 % Petdestrians Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk *Per..11estriatls and Bicycles on Crosswalk. ll_,: Left, R: Right, T: 'Ihmu, U: U-1'urtl 188 04 -Central Road & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979466, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 O N ate5 m O Ln v � Ufu o H u rl rl 0) E •11 9 [N] Albert Total: 24 In: 13 Out: 11 rnr-Irn Adn"',, Out: 8 In: 12 Total: 20 [S] Albert 3 N r -I 605 1° N a I.(1 � 4 U OE O `J O O 189 04_Central Road &Albert Street -TMC GEWALT MMILTON Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979466, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 Leg Central Central Albert Albert Direction Eastbound westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 4:45PM 5 191 1 0 197 0 4 231 4 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 6 0 442 5:OOPM 3 179 1 0 183 0 5 288 2 0 295 0 0 1 6 0 7 1 1 0 3 0 4 0 489 5:15PM 1 231 4 0 236 0 3 276 1 0 280 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 520 5:30PM 5 218 0 0 223 0 1 263 6 0 270 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 502 Total 14 819 6 0 839 0 13 1058 13 0 1084 0 1 1 13 0 15 3 2 1 12 0 15 0 1953 % Approach 1.7% 97.6% 0.7% 0% -- 1.2%97.6% 1.2% 0% -- 6.7/o 6.7% 86.7°/% 0% -- 13.3% 6.7% 80.0% 0% - %Total 0.7%41.9% 0.3% 0%43.0% 0.7% 54.2% 0.7% 0%55.59/6 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% 0% 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6%0% 0.8% PHF 0.700 0.886 0.375 - 0.889 0.650 0.918 0.542 - 0.918 0.250 0.250 0.542 - 0.536 0.500 0.250 0.600 -0.625 0.938 Lights 14 810 6 0 830 13 1056 13 0 1082 1 1 12 0 14 2 1 12 0 15 1941 % Lights 100% 98.9% 100% 0% 98.9% 100% 99.8% 100% 0% 99-8% 100% 100% 92.3% 09/0 93.3% 100%100% 100%0%100% ..99.4% Articulated Trucks 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.4% 0%0% 0.4% 09/0 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 09/0 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 6 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0.7% 0%0% 0.79/0 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 7.7% 0% 6.7% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0.4% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 %Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% - 0.1% Pedestrians 0 0 2 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 66.7'Y,, - - Bicycles oa Crosswalk 0 0 1 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .33.3% - - - - - Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R. Right, "[': Thrti, UJ: (J-fi nm 190 04 -Central Road & Albert Street - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979466, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 [N] Albert Total: 43 In: 15 Out: 28 �rlN 1 —i—irn Out: 20 In: 15 Total: 35 [S] Albert 13 00 1058 c — 00 ca 13 U 4 _ m 0 W 0 u O 191 0 C' O 4-J rj v � U 14 �4-1 o Cn _ M CO 819 E 6 [N] Albert Total: 43 In: 15 Out: 28 �rlN 1 —i—irn Out: 20 In: 15 Total: 35 [S] Albert 13 00 1058 c — 00 ca 13 U 4 _ m 0 W 0 u O 191 05 -Central Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979465, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 Leg Central Central Mt Prospect Mt Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 7:OOAM 27 167 2 0 196 0 16 90 0 0 106 0 1 30 32 0 63 0 0 50 7 0 57 0 422 7:15AM 22 259 7 0 288 1 16 79 1 0 96 0 3 47 35 0 85 0 0 44 10 0 54 0 523 7:30AM 18 216 1 0 235 0 22 137 0 0 159 0 0 47 38 0 85 0 0 42 17 0 59 0 538 7:45AM 27 200 4 0 231 0 31 135 0 0 166 0 0 63 34 0 97 0 0 55 14 0 69 0 563 Hourly Total 94 842 14 0 950 1 85 441 1 0 527 0 4 187 139 0 330 0 0 191 48 0 239 0 2046 8:00AM 17 207 3 1 228 0 23 147 0 0 170 0 4 57 14 0 75 0 0 45 16 0 61 1 534 8:15AM 33 180 3 0 216 1 14 113 0 0 127 0 6 65 34 0 105 0 0 54 14 0 68 0 516 8:30AM 34 195 4 0 233 0 13 126 0 0 139 0 2 48 29 0 79 0 0 46 15 0 61 0 512 8:45AM 28 126 2 0 156 0 18 111 0 0 129 0 6 52 28 0 86 0 0 35 21 0 56 0 427 Hourly Total 112 708 12 1 833 1 68 497 0 0 565 0 18 222 105 0 345 0 0 180 66 0 246 1 1989 4:OOPM 34 159 6 0 199 0 25 197 0 0 222 0 6 55 24 0 85 0 0 54 40 0 94 0 600 4:15PM 31 121 3 0 15s 0 24 155 0 0 179 1 6 88 30 0 124 0 0 94 52 0 146 0 604 4:30PM 23 163 7 0 193 0 32 203 0 0 235 0 12 83 24 0 119 0 0 84 49 0 133 0 680 4:45PM 42 146 6 0 194 1 36 186 0 0 222 0 8 82 32 0 122 0 81 48 0 129 0 667 Hourly Total 130 589 22 0 741 1 117 741 0 0 858 1 32 308 110 0 450 2 0 313 189 0 502 0 2551 5:OOPM 32 146 3 0 181 2 24 229 1 0 254 0 7 69 31 0 107 0 0 113 57 0 170 0 712 5:15PM 43 181 7 0 231 0 34 210 0 0 244 0 7 88 31 0 126 0 0 94 62 0 156 1 757 5:30PM 35 175 6 0 216 0 35 206 0 0 241 0 5 86 29 0 120 0 0 78 60 0 138 0 715 5:45PM 30 163 10 0 203 0 22 194 0 0 216 0 6 72 18 0 96 0 0 82 32 0 114 0 629 Hourly Total 140 665 26 0 831 2 115 839 1 0 955 0 25 315 109 0 449 0 0 367 211 0 578 1 2813 Total 476 2804 74 1 3355 5 385 2518 2 0 2905 1. 79 1032 463 0 1574 2 0 1051 514 0 1565 2 9399 %Approach 14.2% 83.6% 2.2% 0% -- 13.3% 86.7% 0.1%0% -- 5.0% 65.6% 29.4% 0% -- 0% 67.2% 32.8% 0% - % Total 5.1% 29.8% 0.8% 0% 35-7% 4.1% 26.8% 0%0%30.9% 0.8% 11.0% 4.9% 0% 16.7% 0% 11.2% 5.5% 0% 16-7% Lights 469 2758 73 1 3301 362 2482 2 0 2846 76 995 438 0 1509 0 1022 503 0 1525 9181 % Lights 98.5% 98.4% 98.6% 100% 98.4% 94.0% 98.6% 100% 0% 98.0% 96.2% 96.4% 94.6% 0% 95.9% 0% 97.2% 97.9% 0% 97.4% ..97.7% Articulated Trucks 1 13 1 0 15 13 16 0 0 29 0 16 13 0 29 0 15 1 0 16 89 %Articulated Trucks 0.2% 0.5% 1.4% 0% 0.4% - 3.4% 0.6% 0%0% 1.0% 0% 1.6% 2.8% 0% 1.8% - 0% 1.4% 0.2%0% 1-09/6 - 0.9% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 6 32 0 0 38 10 18 0 0 28 3 21 11 0 35 0 13 10 0 23 124 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1.3% 1.1% 0% 0% 1.1% 2.6% 0.7% 0%0% 1.0% 3.8% 2.0% 2.4% 0% 2.2% 0% 1.2% 1.9%0% 1.5°/a 1.3% Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 5 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.1% 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0.1% Pedestrians 1 0 2 - 2 Pedestrians 2a.0% 0% 100% - 100% Bicycles on Crosswalk 4 1_ 0 0 Bicycles on Crosswalk----- 80.0%---- - 100%---- - 0%----- 0% Pedestrians anti Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right Q': Thru, U -J: 11 -Turn 192 05 -Central Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979465, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 N rl rl M 7 ro ^ O a -J LD LO v LO U fu o u Ln Ln M M 1 476 f►:1A 74 [N] Mt Prospect Total: 3075 In: 1565 Out: 1510 LnLn Ln o Ol N M M 110 o ;1- Out: 1510 In: 1574 Total: 3084 [S] Mt Prospect IF, Ln 2518 rn N C � — N L 385 N U 4� _ r W N u M O 193 05_Central Road &Mount Prospect Road -TMC GEWALT HAMILTON Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979465, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 Leg Central Central Mt Prospect Mt Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 7:30AM 18 216 1 0 235 0 22 137 0 0 159 0 0 47 38 0 85 0 0 42 17 0 59 0 538 7:45AM 27 200 4 0 231 0 31 135 0 0 166 0 0 63 34 0 97 0 0 55 14 0 69 0 563 8:OOAM 17 207 3 1 228 0 23 147 0 0 170 0 4 57 14 0 75 0 0 45 16 0 61 1 534 8:15AM 33 180 3 0 216 1 14 113 0 0 127 0 6 65 34 0 105 0 0 54 14 0 68 0 516 Total 95 803 11 1 910 1 90 532 0 0 622 0 10 232 120 0 362 0 0 196 61 0 257 1 2151 % Approach 10.4%88.2% 1.2% 0.1% - 14.5% 85.5% 0% 0% - 2.8% 64.1% 33.1% 0% - 0% 76.3% 23.7% 0% - %Total 4.4% 37.3% 0.5% 0%42.31/. 4.2% 24.7% 0% 0% 28.9% 0.5% 10.8% 5.6% 0% 16.8% 0% 9.1% 2.8% 0% 11.9% PIIF 0.720 0.929 0.688 0.250 0.968 0.726 0.905 - - 0.915 0.417 0.892 0.789 - 0.862 - 0.903 0.897 - 0.941 0.956 Lights 92 788 11 1 892 85 523 0 0 608 9 216 115 0 340 0 181 56 0 237 2077 % Lights 96.8% 98.1% 100% 100% 98.0% 94.4% 98.3% 0% 0% 97.7% 90.0% 93.1% 95.8% 0% 93.9% 0% 92.3% 91.8% 0% 92.2% ..96.6%1 Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 3 5 0 0 8 0 9 2 0 11 0 8 1 0 9 29 %Articulated Trucks 0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.1% 3.3% 0.9%0%0% 1.3% 0% 3.9% 1.7% 0% 3.0% 0% 4.1% 1.6%0% 3.50A 1.3% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 3 14 0 0 17 2 4 0 0 6 1 7 3 0 11 0 6 4 0 10 44 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 3.2% 1.7% 0% 0% 1.9% - 2.2% 0.8%0%0% 1.0% 10.0% 3.0% 2.5% 0% 3.0% 0% 3.1% 6.6%0% 3.91/6 2.0% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0.5% 0%0% 0.49/6 0% Pedestrians 0 O 0 - % Pedest'r'ians 0% 00% Bicycles on Crosswalk 1 0 0 0 °/ra Bicycles on Crosswalk .• .• .• .• .• 100% .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• - 0% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right,'T' Thrt.i, UJ: tJ-11"ulrn 194 05 -Central Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979465, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 1 95 803 11 [N] Mt Prospect Total: 584 In: 257 Out: 327 O N O r -I M N N ri Out: 297 In: 362 Total: 659 [S] Mt Prospect 532 N L 90Ln N 4� U o r, m � w N u 7 O 195 05_Central Road &Mount Prospect Road -TMC GEWALT HAMILTON Thu Aug 25, 2022 PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979465, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 Leg Central Central Mt Prospect Mt Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 4:45PM 42 146 6 0 194 1 36 186 0 0 222 0 8 82 32 0 122 2 0 81 48 0 129 0 667 S:OOPM 32 146 3 0 181 2 23 229 1 0 254 0 7 69 31 0 107 0 0 113 57 0 170 0 712 5:15PM 43 181 7 0 231 0 34 210 0 0 244 0 7 88 31 0 126 O 0 94 62 0 156 1 757 5:30PM 35 175 6 0 216 0 35 206 0 0 241 0 5 86 29 0 120 0 0 78 60 0 138 0 715 Total 152 648 22 0 822 3 129 831 1 0 961 0 27 325 123 0 475 2 0 366 227 0 593 1 2851 % Approach 18.5% 78.8% 2.7/o 0% - 13.4% 86.5% 0.1%0% - 5.7% 68.4% 25.9% 0% - - 0% 61.7% 38.3% 0% - %Total 5.3% 22.7% 0.8% 0% 28.8% 4.5% 29.1% 0% 0% 33.7% 0.9% 11.4% 4.3% 0% 16.71% ..0% 12.8% 8.0% 0% 20.8% PIIF 0.884 0.895 0.786 - 0.890 0.896 0.906 0.250 - 0.945 0.844 0.923 0.953 - 0.940 - 0.810 0.915 - 0.872 0.941 Lights 150 641 22 0 813 125 829 1 0 955 27 320 117 0 464 0 366 227 0 593 2825 % Lights 98.7% 98.9% 100% 0% 98.9% 96.9% 99.8% 100% 0% 99.40% 100% 98.5% 95.1% 0% 97.7% 0% 100% 100%0% 100% ..99.1% Articulated Trucks 1 3 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 % Articulated "Trucks 0.7% 0.5% 0%0% 0.5% - 1.6% 0% 0%0% 0.2% 0% 0.3% 2.4% 0% 0.81/. - 0% 0% 0%0% 0% - 0.4% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1 4 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 3 0 4 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 14 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0.7% 0.6% 0%0% 0.6% 1.6% 0.1% 0%0% 0.3% 0% 1.2% 1.6% 0% 1.3% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% - 0.5% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0%0% 09/o 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.8% 0% 0.2% - 0% 0% 0%0% 0% - 0.1% Pedestrians 0 O 2 - % Pedestrians - - - - - 0°l - - - - - - - - - - 100% - - - - 100% Sir..yr..kes on Crosswalk 3 0 0 0 %Bicycles on Crosswalk 100%) 0% 0% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right,'T' Thnt, UJ: tJ-Tulrn 196 05 -Central Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979465, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 Ln O O 4-, O v � Ufu ^ 4� o � N u N 00 E [N] Mt Prospect Total: 1071 In: 593 Out: 478 N l0 N M 152 648 22 r- Ln M N N N M 1-1 Out: 517 In: 475 Total: 992 [S] Mt Prospect 1 ri 831 c N � M L 129 r N U �4_ � 0 W u 7 O 197 06 Rand Road & Central Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979464, Location: 42.066191, -87.920633 rA fil GEWALT HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US Leg Central Central Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped'* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Pere* L T R U App Ped'* Int 2022-08-25 7:OOAM 0 119 72 0 191 0 7 69 19 0 95 0 33 107 3 0 143 1 23 179 0 0 202 0 631 7:15AM 0 192 104 0 296 0 8 70 19 0 97 0 30 87 5 0 122 0 26 187 0 0 213 0 728 7:30AM 0 168 77 0 245 0 8 117 32 0 157 0 44 129 5 0 178 0 33 200 0 0 233 0 813 7:45AM 0 152 87 0 239 1 12 119 34 0 165 0 50 135 5 0 190 0 27 181 0 0 208 0 802 Hourly Total 0 631 340 0 971 1 35 375 104 0 514 0 157 458 18 0 633 1 109 747 0 0 856 0 2974 8:00AM 0 127 78 0 205 0 4 113 37 0 154 1 51 120 4 0 175 1 34 175 0 0 209 1 743 8:15AM 0 154 76 0 230 0 5 96 14 0 115 0 30 131 2 0 163 0 24 182 0 0 206 0 714 8:30AM 0 149 73 0 222 0 3 96 16 0 115 0 49 125 7 0 181 0 29 156 0 0 185 0 703 8:45AM 0 98 51 0 149 0 3 85 25 0 113 0 44 151 5 0 200 0 24 167 0 0 191 0 653 Hourly Total 0 528 278 0 806 0 15 390 92 0 497 1 174 527 18 0 719 1 111 680 0 0 791 1 2813 4:OOPM 0 120 64 0 184 0 5 141 39 0 185 0 71 172 16 0 259 1 24 167 0 0 191 1 819 4:15PM 0 109 45 1 155 0 8 116 41 0 165 0 81 202 6 0 289 1 24 132 0 0 156 0 765 4:30PM 0 140 53 2 195 0 15 150 39 0 204 0 70 192 7 0 269 0 27 162 0 0 189 0 857 4:45PM 0 112 58 0 170 1. 7 147 47 0 201 0 77 227 12 0 316 34 161 0 0 195 1 882 Hourly Total 0 481 220 3 704 1 35 554 166 0 755 0 299 793 41 0 1133 3 109 622 0 0 731 2 3323 5:OOPM 0 127 63 0 190 0 6 171 31 0 208 0 94 172 10 0 276 0 38 171 1 0 210 0 884 5:15PM 0 136 67 0 203 1. 9 164 50 0 223 0 67 172 8 0 247 0 40 178 0 0 218 1 891 5:30PNI 0 158 63 0 221 1 8 164 33 0 205 0 86 207 14 0 307 0 26 188 0 0 214 0 947 5:45PM 0 135 52 0 187 0 6 149 37 0 192 0 67 175 8 0 250 0 30 180 0 0 210 0 839 Hourly Total 0 556 245 0 801 2 29 648 151 0 828 0 314 726 40 0 1080 0 134 717 1 0 852 1 3561 Total 0 2196 1083 3 3282 4 114 1967 513 0 2594 1 944 2504 117 0 3565 5 463 2766 1 0 3230 4 12671 % Approach 0% 66.9% 33.0% 0.1% - 4.4% 75.8% 19.8% 0% - 26.5% 70.2% 3.3% 0°% - 14.3% 85.6% 0%0% - % Total 0% 17.3% 8.5% 0% 25.9% 0.9% 15.5% 4.0% 0% 20.5% 7.5% 19.8% 0.9% 0% 28.1% 3.7% 21.8% 0% 0% 25.5% Lights 0 2134 1072 3 3209 112 1921 504 0 2537 932 2464 116 0 3512 453 2723 1 0 3177- 12435 % Lights 0% 97.2% 99.0% 100% 97-8% 98.2% 97.7% 98.2% 0% 97.8% 98.7% 98.4% 99.1% 0°% 98.5% 97.8% 98.4% 100% 0% 98.4% ..98.1% Articulated Trucks 0 26 3 0 29 2 22 0 0 24 6 10 0 0 16 1 10 0 0 11 80 % Articulated Trucks 0% 1.2% 0.3% 0% 0.9% 1.8% 1.1% 0%0% 0.9% 0.6% 0.4% 0%0% 0.4% 0.2% 0.4% 0%0% 0.3% 0.6% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 36 8 0 44 0 22 9 0 31 6 30 1 0 37 9 33 0 0 42 154 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 1.6% 0.7% 0% 1.3% 0% 1.1% 1.8% 0% 1.2% 0.6% 1.2% 0.9%0% 1.0% 1.9% 1.2% 0%0% 1.31/. 1.2% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pede,lriaus - 4 0 ;i 4 %Pedestrians - - - - 100°lr, - - - - - 01y, - - - - 100% - - - - -100% Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 1 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - '- '- '- '- 0% '- - - - 100% - '- '- '- - 0% - - - - - 0% Pedestrians an(1 Bic'yc'les on CrosSWalk L: Left, R: 1Z ght, ` : '1'hn_i, l.I: 0..I -Turn 198 06 -Rand Road & Central Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Full Length (7 AM -9 AM, 4 PM -6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979464, Location: 42.066191, -87.920633 [N]Rand Total: 6247 In: 3230 Out: 3017 �D M r I Lo IZT LD N 2 2"'°°°���IIIIII�ODIJUlUlI464NNNNNNnna�' It � o � rn Ln N Out: 3963 In: 3565 Total: 7528 [S] Rand 513 1967 rn Ln N O n Ma 114 Ln N U r, N `J O 199 M Ln rn N L a -J v � U fu 3 �4� o � N O u N 2196 E 1083 [N]Rand Total: 6247 In: 3230 Out: 3017 �D M r I Lo IZT LD N 2 2"'°°°���IIIIII�ODIJUlUlI464NNNNNNnna�' It � o � rn Ln N Out: 3963 In: 3565 Total: 7528 [S] Rand 513 1967 rn Ln N O n Ma 114 Ln N U r, N `J O 199 06 Rand Road & Central Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 f ij GEWALT HAMILTON Forced Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979464, Location: 42.066191, -87.920633 Leg Central Central Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped'" L T R U App Ped" L T R U App Ped" L T R U App Fed" Int 2022-08-25 7:30AM 0 168 77 0 245 0 8 117 32 0 157 0 44 129 5 0 178 0 33 200 0 0 233 0 813 7:45_4M 0 152 87 0 239 1 12 119 34 0 165 0 50 135 5 0 190 0 27 181 0 0 208 0 802 8:00_4M 0 127 78 0 205 0 4 113 37 0 154 1 51 120 4 0 175 1 34 175 0 0 209 1 743 8:15AM 0 154 76 0 230 0 5 96 14 0 115 0 30 131 2 0 163 0 24 182 0 0 206 0 714 Total 0 601 318 0 919 1 29 445 117 0 591 1 175 515 16 0 706 1 118 738 0 0 856 1 3072 % Approach 0% 65.4% 34.6% 0% - 4.9% 75.3% 19.8% 0% - 24.8% 72.9% 2.3% 0% - 13.8% 86.2% 0% 0% - % Total 0% 19.6% 10.4% 0% 29.9% 0.9% 14.5% 3.8% 0%19.2% 5.7% 16.8% 0.5% 0% 23.0% 3.8% 24.0% 0% 0% 27.9% PBF - 0.894 0.914 - 0.938 0.604 0.935 0.791 - 0.895 0.858 0.954 0.800 - 0.929 0.868 0.923 - - 0.918 0.945 Lights 0 582 314 0 896 28 433 112 0 573 173 493 16 0 682 116 727 0 0 843 2994 % Lights 0% 96.8% 98.7% 0% 97.5% 96.6% 97.3% 95.7% 0% 97.0% 98.9% 95.7% 100% 0% 96.6% 98.3% 98.5% 0% 0% 98.51/. ..97.5% Articulated Trucks 0 4 0 0 4 1 9 0 0 10 0 5 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 3 22 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.7% 0%0% 0.4% 3.4% 2.0% 0%0% 1.7% 0% 1.0% 0% 0% 0.70% 0% 0.4%0%0% 0.4% 0.7% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 15 4 0 19 0 3 5 0 8 2 17 0 0 19 2 8 0 0 10 56 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 2.5% 1.3%0% 2.1% 0% 0.7/n 4.3%0% 1.40% 1.1% 3.3% 0% 0% 2.70% 1.7% 1.1%0%0% 1.2% 1.8% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians - 1 0 1 1 % Pedestrians - - - - - 100% - - - - - 0% - - - - - 100% - - - - - 100% Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 1 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - 0% - - - - - 100% - - - - - 0% - - - - - 0% Pedestrians and Bicycles o11 Crosswalk. L: Left, R. Right, T: "I'll III, 4J: IJ-1[,urli 200 06 -Rand Road & Central Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 Forced Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979464, Location: 42.066191, -87.920633 O N Ln O Ufu �4-1 o � rn rl u M E 601 318 [N]Rand Total: 1488 In: 856 Out: 632 w co M I� ri %0/a/a/n Ln Ln Ln Out: 1085 In: 706 Total: 1791 [S] Rand 117 r -I 445 LnN rna 29 U Ln W r- u O 201 06_Rand Road &Central Road -TMC GEWALT HAMILTON Thu Aug 25, 2022 PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979464, Location: 42.066191, -87.920633 Leg Central Central Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-25 4:45PM 0 112 58 0 170 1 7 147 47 0 201 0 77 227 12 0 316 1 34 161 0 0 195 1. 882 S:OOPM 0 127 63 0 190 0 6 171 31 0 208 0 94 172 10 0 276 O 38 171 1 0 210 0 884 5:15PM 0 136 67 0 203 1 9 164 50 0 223 0 67 172 8 0 247 O 40 178 0 0 218 1 891 5:30PM 0 158 63 0 221 1 8 164 33 0 205 0 86 207 14 0 307 0 26 188 0 0 214 0 947 Total 0 533 251 0 784 3 30 646 161 0 837 0 324 778 44 0 1146 1 138 698 1 0 837 2 3604 % Approach 0% 68.0% 32.0% 0% - 3.6% 77.2% 19.2%0% - 28.3% 67.9% 3.8% 0% - 16.5%83.4% 0.1%0% - %Total 0% 14.8% 7.0% 0% 21.81/6 0.8% 17.9% 4.5% 0% 23.2% 9.0% 21.6% 1.2% 0% 31.8% 3.8% 19.4% 0%0%23.2% PIIF - 0.843 0.937 - 0.887 0.833 0.943 0.805 - 0.937 0.862 0.857 0.786 - 0.907 0.863 0.928 0.250 - 0.960 0.951 Lights 0 522 248 0 770 30 642 161 0 833 322 775 44 0 1141 135 691 1 0 827 3571 % Lights 0% 97.9% 98.8% 0% 98.2% 100% 99.4% 100% 0% 99.5% 99.4% 99.6% 100% 0% 99.6% 97.8% 99.0% 100% 0% 98.8% ..99.1% Articulated Trucks 0 7 2 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 14 %Articulated Trucks 0% 1.3% 0.8% 0% 1.1% 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0.3% 0% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0.4% 0%0% 0.40A 0.4% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 4 1 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 4 3 4 0 0 7 18 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0.8% 0.4%0% 0.61/. 0% 0.3% 0%0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0%0% 0.3% 2.2% 0.6% 0%0% 0.8% 0.5% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 3 0 1 2 % Pedestrians 100% 100% 100% Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 O 0 %Bicycles on Crosswalk Or'/rr 0% 0% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T[ Thri.1, UJ: tJ-Tulrn 202 06 -Rand Road & Central Road - TMC Thu Aug 25, 2022 PM Peak (4:45 PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979464, Location: 42.066191, -87.920633 251 [N]Rand Total: 1776 In: 837 Out: 939 00 CD rl Ol M l0 r1 0 N I� M I� Out: 979 In: 1146 Total: 2125 [S] Rand 161 646 M 00 � N � LnLn L a -J 30 N U Ln o W u O 203 N rn Ln O a.J Ln 0) Ufu � -- 4 o 00 533 C 251 [N]Rand Total: 1776 In: 837 Out: 939 00 CD rl Ol M l0 r1 0 N I� M I� Out: 979 In: 1146 Total: 2125 [S] Rand 161 646 M 00 � N � LnLn L a -J 30 N U Ln o W u O 203 01 -Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979469, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 Leg Direction Time 2022-08-27 1 1:OOAM 11:15AM 11:30AM 11:45AM Henry Eastbound T 3 6 7 5 R 2 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 App 5 6 7 5 Ped* 0 1 0 0 Henry Westbound L T 0 4 1 9 2 13 2 9 U 0 0 0 0 App 4 10 15 11 Ped* 0 0 0 0 Albert Northbound L R 4 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 U 0 0 0 0 App 4 3 3 1 Ped" 1 0 0 0 Int 13 19 25 17 Hourly Total 21 2 0 23 1 5 35 0 40 0 8 3 0 11 1 74 12:OOPM 4 1 0 5 0 2 11 0 13 0 3 1 0 4 0 22 12:15PM 2 1 0 3 1 1 5 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 1. 10 12:30PM 1 1 0 2 1 1 7 0 8 0 4 1 1 6 0 16 12:45PM 9 3 0 12 0 3 5 0 8 0 0 1 0 1 0 21 Hourly Total 16 6 0 22 2 7 28 0 35 0 7 4 1 12 1 69 Total 37 8 0 45 3 12 63 0 75 0 15 7 1 23 2 143 %Approach 82.2% 17.8% 0% - 16.0% 84.0% 0% - 65.2% 30.4% 4.3% - - %Total 25.9% 5.6% 0% 31.5% 8.4% 44.1% 0% 52.4% 10.5% 4.9% 0.7% 16.1% Lights 36 5 0 41 12 62 0 74 13 7 1 21 136 %Lights 97.3% 62.5% 0% 91.1% 100% 98.4% 0% 98.7% 86.7% 100% 100% 91.3% 95.1% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0°/a 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 12.5% 0% 2.2% 0% 1.6% 0% 1.3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.4% Bicycles on Road 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 5 % Bicycles on Road 2.7% 25.0% 0% 6.7°/6 0% 0% 0% 0% 13.3% 0% 0% 8.7% 3.5% Pedestrians 3 0 2 % Pedestrians - - - - 100°la - - - - - - - - 100% Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk _ _ _ .- 0"la - - - - - - - - 0% *Pe=destrians and Bicycles oil Crosswalk, Q_,: Left, R: Righl, ' : Thm, 4J. U-Tktm 204 01 -Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979469, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 0 -i Ln r- -1 Out: 21 In: 23 Total: 44 [S] Albert 205 1 00 � t O irn � lY +- O Ln H 37 � u.. C w 8 0 -i Ln r- -1 Out: 21 In: 23 Total: 44 [S] Albert 205 01_Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 ri ALT HAMILTON Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) mij ' EWLO I ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979469, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 Leg Henry Henry Albert Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Time T R U App Ped* L T U App Ped* L R U App Ped" Int 2022-08-2711:45AM 5 0 0 5 0 2 9 0 11 0 1 0 0 1 0 17 12:OOPM 4 1 0 5 0 2 11 0 13 0 3 1 0 4 0 22 12:1 SPM 2 1 0 3 1 1 5 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 1 10 12:30PM 1 1 0 2 1 1 7 0 8 0 4 1 1 6 0 16 Total 12 3 0 15 2 6 32 0 38 0 8 3 1 12 1 65 %Approach 80.0% 20.0% 0% - 15.8% 84.2% 0% - 66.7% 25.0% 8.3% - %Total 18.5% 4.6% 0% 23.1% 9.2% 49.2% 0% 58.5% 12.3% 4.6% 1.5% 18.5% PHF 0.600 0.250 - 0.650 0.750 0.727 - 0.731 0.500 0.750 0.250 0.500 0.726 Lights 12 1 0 13 6 31 0 37 6 3 1 10 60 %Lights 100% 33.3% 0% 86.7% 100% 96.9% 0% 97.4°/a 75.0% 100% 100% 83.31% 92.3% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 00/0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.1% 0% 2.6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.5% Bicycles on Road 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 % Bicycles on Road 0% 66.7% 0% 13.3% 0% 0% 0% 0°/a 25.0% 0% 0% 16.7% 6.2% Pedestrians 2 0 1 % Pe_des Lrikuis _ _ _ .- 100% _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .- 1.00% Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 % Bicycles an Crosswalk - - - - 0% - - - - - - - - 0% Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. I_,: Left, R: Right,']': Thrta, QJ: U-' t.trn 206 01 -Henry Street & Albert Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979469, Location: 42.068002, -87.924511 12 J 0 ,1 0 m Out: 10 In: 12 Total: 22 [S] Albert 32 0 m c >1 m i 6 Ln 4 _ L0� LU u O 207 02 -Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979470, Location: 42.068118, -87.924058 Leg Direction Time 2022-08-27 1 1:OOAM 11:15AM 11:30AM 11:45AM Henry Eastbound L 1 4 1 1 R U 1 0 4 0 6 0 4 0 App 2 8 7 5 Ped* 1 0 0 0 Rand Northbound L T U 2 231 0 5 262 0 7 272 0 4 278 0 App 233 267 279 282 Pel* 0 0 0 } Rand Southbound T R 263 3 205 5 279 8 231 7 U 0 0 0 0 App 266 210 287 238 Ped' 1 1 0 0 Int 501 485 573 525 Hourly Total 7 15 0 22 1 18 1043 0 1061 0 978 23 0 1001 2 2084 12:00PM 2 4 0 6 0 9 271 0 280 0 297 6 0 303 0 589 12:15PM 0 1 0 1 0 4 241 0 245 0 219 1 0 220 2 466 12:30PM 0 2 0 2 0 5 296 0 301 0 300 3 0 303 1 606 12:45PM 2 4 0 6 0 2 231 0 233 0 258 6 0 264 0 503 Hourly Total 4 11 0 15 0 20 1039 0 1059 0 1074 16 0 1090 3 2164 Total 11 26 0 37 1 38 2082 0 2120 0 2052 39 0 2091 5 4248 %Approach 29.7% 70.3% 0% - 1.8% 98.2% 0% - 98.1% 1.9% 0% - %Total 0.3% 0.6% 0% 0.9% 0.9% 49.0% 0% 49.9% 48.3% 0.9% 0% 49.2% Lights 11 26 0 37 38 2061 0 2099 2030 38 0 2068 4204 %Lights 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 99.0% 0% 99.0% 98.9% 97.4% 0% 98.9% 99.0% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 0 5 10 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.2% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 17 1 0 18 34 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.8% 0% 0.8% 0.8% 2.6% 0% 0.9% 0.8% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 1 0 5 % Pedestrians 1.00% 100% Bicycles on Crosswarlli---- 0---- 0---- 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - 0°lo- - - - - - - - - 0111, *Pedestrians and Bicycles oti Crosswalk, Q_,: ll eft„ R: Right,''. Thm, 4J. U-Tt:trtl 208 02 -Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979470, Location: 42.068118, -87.924058 [N]Rand Total: 4184 In: 2091 Out: 2093 N Ol Ln M O N 0 2 00 N M 00 0 N Out: 2078 In: 2120 Total: 4198 [S] Rand 209 n a+ r � rl O rl 4 11 m 26 u E [N]Rand Total: 4184 In: 2091 Out: 2093 N Ol Ln M O N 0 2 00 N M 00 0 N Out: 2078 In: 2120 Total: 4198 [S] Rand 209 02_Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 ri ALT HAMILTON Midday Peak (WKND), Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) - Overall'EW ~ INC. Peak Hour ASSOCIAProvided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979470, Location: 42.068118, -87.924058 Leg Henry Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Northbound Southbound Time L R U App Ped* L T U App Ped* T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-2711:45AM 1 4 0 5 0 4 278 0 282 0 231 7 0 238 0 525 12:OOPM 2 4 0 6 0 9 271 0 280 0 297 6 0 303 0 589 12:15PM 0 1 0 1 0 4 241 0 245 0 219 1 0 220 2 466 12:30PM 0 2 0 2 O 5 296 0 301 O 300 3 0 303 606 Total 3 11 0 14 O 22 1086 0 1108 0 1047 17 0 1064 3 2186 %Approach 21.4% 78.6% 0% - 2.0% 98.0% 0% - 98.4% 1.6% 0% - %Total 0.1% 0.5% 0% 0.6% 1.0% 49.7% 0% 50.79(1 47.9% 0.8% 0% 48.7% PHF 0.375 0.688 - 0.583 0.611 0.917 - 0.920 0.873 0.607 - 0.878 0.902 Lights 3 11 0 14 22 1076 0 1098 1035 16 0 1051 2163 %Lights 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 99.1% 0% 99.1% 98.9% 94.1% 0% 98.8% 98.9% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 3 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0% 0.1% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 10 1 0 11 20 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.8% 0% 0.8% 1.0% 5.9% 0% 1.0% 0.9% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 00/0 0% Pedestrians 0 0 3 % Pedestrians _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ ._ 1.00`!0 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 _ ._ 01- % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% Pedestrians and Bicycles ctl Crosswalk. I_,: Lefty, R: Right, '7C: "]Clan, QJ: QJ-'7[,um 210 02 -Rand Road & Henry Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Midday Peak (WKND), Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979470, Location: 42.068118, -87.924058 rn m i ro 'nO _ 6 o zt 3 11 1„11' [N]Rand Total: 2153 In: 1064 Out: 1089 � o Out: 1058 In: 1108 Total: 2166 [S] Rand 211 03 -Rand Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979471, Location: 42.066895, -87.922148 • •' 9 • 11 Leg Direction Time 2022-08-2711:00AM 11:15AM 11:30AM 11:45AM Rand Eastbound L T 28 180 13 148 22 186 23 147 R 58 64 83 68 U 0 0 0 0 App 266 225 291 238 Pedi' 0 0 0 1 Rand Westbound L T 0 154 0 158 0 188 0 161 R 30 23 22 24 U 0 0 0 0 App Ped* 184 0 181 0 210 0 185 0 Mount Prospect Northbound L T 70 37 82 35 61 45 87 50 R U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 App 107 117 106 137 Pent" 1 0 0 0 Mount Prospect Southbound L T R 14 30 20 22 39 31 22 38 31 20 41 32 U 0 0 0 0 App 64 92 91 93 Ped " 1 1 2 1 Int 621 615 698 653 Hourly Total 86 661 273 0 1020 1 0 661 99 0 760 0 300 167 0 0 467 1 78 148 114 0 340 5 2587 12:OOPM 30 185 78 0 293 0 0 163 19 0 182 0 86 43 0 0 129 0 25 43 27 0 95 0 699 12:15PM 32 160 56 0 248 0 0 149 23 0 172 0 69 43 0 0 112 0 22 47 30 1 100 0 632 12:30PM 18 200 90 0 308 0 0 193 35 0 228 0 83 46 0 0 129 0 20 37 30 0 87 0 752 12:45PM 25 173 60 0 258 1 0 146 26 0 172 0 75 43 0 0 118 0 17 48 21 0 86 2 634 Hourly Total 105 718 284 0 1107 1 0 651 103 0 754 0 313 175 0 0 488 0 84 175 108 1 368 2 2717 Total 191 1379 557 0 2127 2 0 1312 202 0 1514 0 613 342 0 0 955 1. 162 323 222 1 708 7 5304 % Approach 9.0% 64.8% 26.2% 0% - - 0% 86.7% 13.3% 0% - - 64.2% 35.8% 0% 0% - - 22.9% 45.6% 31.4% 0.1% - %Total 3.6% 26.0% 10.5% 0% 40.1% ..0% 24.7% 3.8% 0% 28.5% 11.6% 6.4% 0% 0%18.0% 3.1% 6.1% 4.2% 0%13.3% Lights 191 1364 550 0 2105 0 1300 201 0 1501 611 342 0 0 953 161 322 219 1 703 5262 % Lights 100% 98.9% 98.7% 0% 99-0% 0% 99.1% 99.5% 0% 99.1% ..99.7% 100% 0% 0% 99.8% 99.4% 99.7% 98.6% 100% 99.3% ..99.2% Articulated Trucks 0 4 2 0 6 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 11 %Articulated Trucks 0% 0.3% 0.4%0% 0.3°/u 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0.2% 0%0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.9% 0% 0.3% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 11 4 0 15 0 10 1 0 11 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 30 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0.8% 0.7% 0% 0.7% 0% 0.8% 0.5% 0% 0.7% 0.2% 0%0%0% 0.1% 0.6% 0.3% 0.5% 0% 0.4% 0.6% Bicycles on Road 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0%- 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0%0%0% 00/0 0% 0% 0% 0% 00/0 0% Pedes[rians 1 - O 1 6 % Pedestrians ..50.0% W0% ..85. 85.'7% '% l;icycles on Crosswalk 1 O O 1 % Bicycles on Crosswalk----- 50.0°lG---------- 0°l0---- 14.3% Ej Pedestrians and Bicycles oil Crosswalk L: ]_eft, R. Right, 'I`11ru, IJ: IJ -Turn 212 03 -Rand Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979471, Location: 42.066895, -87.922148 191 1379 557 [N] Mount Prospect Total: 1444 In: 708 Out: 736 N M N N N CO ri N M ri 4 m N I'D m Out: 880 In: 955 Total: 1835 [S] Mount Prospect 202 1312 r -I ul r -I Ln LPI O � �4� Ln W O 213 03_Rand Road &Mount Prospect Road -TMC GEWALT HAMILTON Sat Aug 27, 2022 Midday Peak (WKND), Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979471, Location: 42.066895, -87.922148 Leg Rand Rand Mount Prospect Mount Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped'* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-2711:45AM 23 147 68 0 238 1 0 161 24 0 185 0 87 50 0 0 137 0 20 41 32 0 93 1. 653 12:OOPM 30 185 78 0 293 0 0 163 19 0 182 0 86 43 0 0 129 0 25 43 27 0 95 0 699 12:15PM 32 160 56 0 248 0 0 149 23 0 172 O 69 43 0 0 112 0 22 47 30 1 100 0 632 12:30PM 18 200 90 0 308 0 0 193 35 0 228 0 83 46 0 0 129 0 20 37 30 0 87 0 752 Total 103 692 292 0 1087 1 0 666 101 0 767 0 325 182 0 0 507 0 87 168 119 1 375 1 2736 % Approach 9.5% 63.7% 26.9% 0% - - 0% 86.8% 13.2% 0% - ..64.1% 35.9% 0% 0% - 23.2% 44.8% 31.7% 0.3% - %Total 3.8% 25.3% 10.7/% 0% 39.7% ..0%24.3% 3.7% 0% 28.0% 11.9% 6.7% 0% 0% 18.5% 3.2% 6.1% 4.3% 0%13.7% PIIF 0.805 0.865 0.811 - 0.882 - 0.863 0.721 - 0.841 0.934 0.910 - - 0.925 0.870 0.894 0.930 0.250 0.938 0.910 Lights 103 682 291 0 1076 0 660 101 0 761 324 182 0 0 506 86 168 119 1 374 2717 % Lights 100% 98.6% 99.7% 0% 99.0% ..0%99.1% 100% 0% 99.2% ..99.7% 100% 0% 0% 99-8% ..98.9% 100% 100% 100% 99-7% ..99.3% Articulated Trucks 0 2 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 %Articulated Trucks 0% 0.3% 0.3%0% 0.3% 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 8 0 0 8 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 15 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 1.2% 0%0% 0.7% 0% 0.8% 0%0% 0.7% 0.3% 0%0%0% 0.2% 1.1% 0% 0% 0% 0.30A 0.5% Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0% 0%0% 09/o - 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0%0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 0 - 0 0 0 % Pedestrians 0°l0 0'% Bir..yr..tes on Crosswalk 1 .. 0 0 1 1% Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - 100°/ra 100% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, 'TThrt.i, UJ: U -Turn 214 03_Rand Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 ij GEWALT MMILTON Midday Peak (WKND), Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) - Overall Peak ASSOCIATES, INC. Hour Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979471, Location: 42.066895, -87.922148 0 O �N N o u 00 0 c 103 692 292 [N] Mount Prospect Total: 762 In: 375 Out: 387 Ln N N co m —4 Out: 460 In: 507 Total: 967 [S] Mount Prospect 101 215 04 -Central Road & Albert Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979472, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 Leg Direction Time 2022-08-2711:00AM 11:15AM 11:30AM 11:45AM Central Eastbound L T 1 202 1 198 1 169 1 218 R U 3 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 App Pent1' 206 0 200 0 172 0 221 0 Central Westbound L T 2 162 2 125 2 147 3 187 R 2 3 4 0 U App Ped* 0 166 0 0 130 0 0 153 0 0 190 0 Albert Northbound L T 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 R 5 1 2 4 U App Ped* 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 Albert Southbound L T 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 R 1 1 7 3 U App PeO 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 10 0 0 4 0 Int 380 335 338 421 Hourly Total 4 787 8 0 799 0 9 621 9 0 639 0 3 2 12 0 17 1 4 3 12 0 19 0 1474 12:00PM 3 180 4 0 187 0 1 167 1 0 169 0 2 0 7 0 9 0 1 0 5 0 6 0 371 12:15PM 3 163 0 0 166 0 2 165 2 0 169 0 1 1 5 0 7 1. 1 0 1 0 2 0 344 12:30PM 2 177 1 0 180 0 2 156 4 0 162 0 3 0 5 0 8 1. 0 1 1 0 2 0 352 12:45PM 1 169 2 0 172 0 0 188 1 0 189 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 5 D 370 Hourly Total 9 689 7 0 705 0 5 676 8 0 689 0 6 1 21 0 28 2 3 1 11 0 15 0 1437 Total 13 1476 15 0 1504 0 14 1297 17 0 1328 0 9 3 33 0 45 3 7 4 23 0 34 0 2911 %Approach 0.9%98.1% 1.0%0% - . 1.1%97.7% 1.3% 0% - ..20.0% 6.7% 73.3°/% 0% - 20.6% 11.8% 67.6% 0% - %Total 0.4% 50.7% 0.5% 0% 51.71A 0.5%44.6% 0.6% 0% 45.6% 0.3% 0.1% 1.1% 0% 1.5% 0.2% 0.1% 0.8%0% 1.2% Lights 13 1455 15 0 1483 14 1283 17 0 1314 9 3 31 0 43 7 4 23 0 34 2874 % Lights 100% 98.6% 100% 0% 98.6% 100% 98.9% 100% 0% 98.9% 100% 100% 93.9% 0% 95.6% 100% 100% 100% 0% 1000/6 ..98.7% Articulated Trucks 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.2% 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0%- 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 17 0 0 17 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 32 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 1.2% 0%0% 1.1% 0% 1.0% 0%0% 1.0% 0% 0% 6.1% 0% 4.4°/n 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 1.1% Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 01/6 0% Pedesuhms 0 {) 3 0 % Pedestrians 100% Bicycles on Crosswalk. - - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Bicycles on CrosSWMk .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. D% .. .. .. .. Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk L: Left, R: Right, TQ "T'ltrn, UJ: U- I urn 216 04 -Central Road & Albert Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979472, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 0) N m O 00 N v U fu o u O Lf1 13 1476 15 [N] Albert Total: 67 In: 34 Out: 33 N 2 un'. rnmm M Out: 33 In: 45 Total: 78 [S] Albert 17 00 N 1297 c � 00 14 U OE � u Ln r -I O 217 04 Central Road & Albert Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 fi T MMILTON Midday Peak (WKND), Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) - Overall Peak GEWAL Hour ASSOCIATES, INC. Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979472, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 Leg Central Central Albert Albert Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped'* Int 2022-08-2711:45AM 1 218 2 0 221 0 3 187 0 0 190 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 0 1 3 0 4 0 421 12:OOPM 3 180 4 0 187 0 1 167 1 0 169 0 2 0 7 0 9 0 1 0 5 0 6 0 371 12:15PM 3 163 0 0 166 0 2 165 2 0 169 0 1 1 5 0 7 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 344 12:30PM 2 177 1 0 180 0 2 156 4 0 162 0 3 0 5 0 8 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 352 Total 9 738 7 0 754 0 8 675 7 0 690 0 8 1 21 0 30 2. 2 2 10 0 14 0 1488 °iii Approach 1.2% 97.9% 0.9%0% - - 1.2%97.8% 1.0%0% - ..26.7% 3.3% 70.0°/% 0% - - 14.3% 14.3% 71.4% 0% - - % Total 0.6%49.6% 0.5% 0% 50.7°/a 0.5%45.4% 0.5% 0% 46.4% 0.5% 0.1% 1.4% 0% 2.01% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7%0% 0.9% PHF 0.750 0.849 0.438 - 0.856 0.667 0.902 0.438 - 0.908 0.667 0.250 0.750 - 0.833 0.500 0.500 0.500 -0.583 0.885 Lights 9 732 7 0 748 8 672 7 0 687 8 1 20 0 29 2 2 10 0 14 1478 % Lights 100% 99.2% 100% 0% 99.2% 100% 99.6% 100% 0% 99.6% 100% 100% 95.2% 0% 96.7% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100°x6 ..99.3%1 Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.1% 0%0% 01% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% O% 0%0% 0% 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 4 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0.5% 0%0% 0.5% 0% 0.4% 0%0% 0.4% 0% 0% 4.8% 0% 3.3% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0.5% Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0.1% PMestriarrs 0 0 t 0 % Pedestrians-------------- - 100% ----- Bicycles on Crosswalk----- 0---- 0----- 0----- 0 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% V. Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, TI Than, U: U- Truro 218 04 Central Road & Albert Street - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 ij GEWALT MMILTON Midday Peak (WKND), Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) - Overall Peak ASSOCIATES, INC. Hour Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979472, Location: 42.066202, -87.922907 m rn co � "o 4-1 U M o H u lzt Ln c 17 738 II [N] Albert Total: 31 In: 14 Out: 17 oN N r co 1 -4 N Out: 17 In: 30 Total: 47 [S] Albert 7 0 rn 675 iO c 'n a -J 8 C: N U 4 _ W Q0 r - Z3 O 219 05_Central Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979473, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 rA fil GEWALT HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US Leg Central Central Mt Prospect Mt Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped'* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped'* L T R U App Ped'* Int 2022-08-2711:00AM 40 158 5 0 203 0 20 134 1 0 155 0 8 67 27 0 102 0 0 67 23 0 90 0 550 11:15AM 44 154 5 0 203 0 30 103 0 1 134 1 6 77 28 0 111 0 0 79 25 0 104 0 552 11:30AM 31 135 6 0 172 0 17 112 0 0 129 0 9 77 31 0 117 0 0 94 28 0 122 0 540 11:45AM 40 169 11 0 220 1 29 164 0 0 193 0 7 85 29 0 121 0 0 77 24 0 101 0 635 Hourly Total 155 616 27 0 798 1 96 513 1 1 611 1 30 306 115 0 451 0 0 317 100 0 417 0 2277 12:00PM 24 152 6 0 182 0 26 130 0 0 156 0 5 101 25 0 131 0 0 102 30 0 132 1 601 12:15PM 45 126 6 0 177 0 24 131 1 0 156 0 7 68 37 0 112 0 0 67 30 0 97 1 542 12:30PM 38 136 6 0 180 0 22 122 0 0 144 0 9 100 30 0 139 1 0 96 31 0 127 0 590 12:45PM 33 131 15 0 179 1 28 159 2 0 189 0 5 79 30 0 114 0 0 85 24 0 109 0 591 Hourly Total 140 545 33 0 718 1 100 542 3 0 645 0 26 348 122 0 496 1 0 350 115 0 465 2 2324 Total 295 1161 60 0 1516 2 196 1055 4 1 1256 1 56 654 237 0 947 1 0 667 215 0 882 2 4601 % Approach 19.5% 76.6% 4.0%0% - 15.6% 84.0% 0.3% 0.1% - 5.9% 69.1% 25.0% 0% - 0% 75.6% 24.4% 0% - %Total 6.4%25.2% 1.3%0%32.9% 4.3%22.9% 0.1% 0%27.3% 1.2%14.2% 5.2%0%20.6% 0%14.5% 4.7%0%19.2% Lights 294 1146 59 0 1499 193 1040 4 1 1238 56 653 234 0 943 0 661 214 0 875 4555 % Lights 99.7% 98.7% 98.3% 0% 98.9% 98.5% 98.6% 100% 100% 98.6% 100% 99.8% 98.7% 0% 99.61/6 0% 99.1% 99.5% 0% 99.2% ..99.0% Articulated Trucks 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 8 %Articulated Trucks 0.3% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 1.0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.4% 0% 0.1% 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 13 1 0 14 1 13 0 0 14 0 1 2 0 3 0 5 1 0 6 37 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 1.1% 1.7% 0% 0.9% 0.5% 1.2% 0% 0% 1.1% 0% 0.2% 0.8% O% 0.3%- 0% 0.7% 0.5%0% 0.7%- 0.8% Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0.1% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% - 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 1 0 1 0 %Ped"aians - - - - .50.0% - - - - - 0% - - - - 100% - - - - - 0'Yo Bicycles on Crosswalk I 1 0 2 Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - 50.0% - - - - - 1001y" - - - - - 0% - - - - Pedestrians and Bicycles ol1 Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right,'][': 7111ru, U: U -Turn 220 05 -Central Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979473, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 N m a% (6 0 N O +J 00 � N v U -- 4 � o H LD u r -I Lf1 rl 295 1161 •1 [N] Mt Prospect Total: 1835 In: 882 Out: 953 N LD � � n Ln Ln m 110 N Out: 923 In: 947 Total: 1870 [S] Mt Prospect 4 110 1055 N c ,n ca 196 Ln 1 N —M U o � � W � u M r -I O 221 05_Central Road &Mount Prospect Road -TMC GEWALT HAMILTON Sat Aug 27, 2022 Midday Peak (WKND), Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979473, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 Leg Central Central Mt Prospect Mt Prospect Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-2711:45AM 40 169 11 0 220 1 29 164 0 0 193 0 7 85 29 0 121 0 0 77 24 0 101 0 635 12:OOPM 24 152 6 0 182 0 26 130 0 0 156 0 5 101 25 0 131 0 0 102 30 0 132 1. 601 12:15PM 45 126 6 0 177 0 24 131 1 0 156 0 7 68 37 0 112 0 0 67 30 0 97 1 542 12:30PM 38 136 6 0 180 0 22 122 0 0 144 0 9 100 30 0 139 1 0 96 31 0 127 0 590 Total 147 583 29 0 759 1 101 547 1 0 649 0 28 354 121 0 503 1 0 342 115 0 457 2 2368 % Approach 19.4% 76.8% 3.8%0% - 15.6% 84.3% 0.2%0% - 5.6% 70.4% 24.1% 0% - - 0% 74.8% 25.2% 0% - %Total 6.2% 24.6% 1.2% 0% 32.1% 4.3% 23.1% 0% 0% 27.4% 1.2% 14.9% 5.1% 0% 21.2% ..0%14.4% 4.9% 0%19.3% PIIF 0.817 0.866 0.659 - 0.865 0.871 0.834 0.250 - 0.841 0.778 0.876 0.818 - 0.905 - 0.838 0.927 - 0.866 0.933 Lights 147 577 29 0 753 10O 541 1 0 642 28 353 120 0 501 0 341 115 0 456 2352 % Lights 100% 99.0% 100% 0% 99.2% 99.0% 98.9% 100% 0% 98.9% 100% 99.7% 99.2% 0% 99.6% ..0%99.7% 100% 0% 99-8% ..99.3% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 O 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 %Articulated Trucks 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0.4% 0%0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%- 0% 0.3% 0%0% 0.2% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 4 0 0 4 1 4 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0.7% 0%0% 0.5% 1.0% 0.7% 0%0% 0.8% 0% 0.3% 0.8% 0% 0.4% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0.5% Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians 0 0 1 - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - 0°l0 - - - - - - - - - - 100% - - - - - ON, Sir..yr..les on Crosswalk 1 0 0 1. %Bicycles on Crossw k - - - - - 10 y" - - - - - - - - - - o% - - - - - 100% *Ppdestruatl,s and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, 'TThnt, UJ: U -Turn 222 05_Central Road & Mount Prospect Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 ij GEWALT MMILTON Midday Peak (WKND), Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) - Overall Peak ASSOCIATES, INC. Hour Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979473, Location: 42.066179, -87.922183 [N] Mt Prospect Total: 959 In: 457 Out: 502 Ln N r-1 1:t r-1 M 00 r N Ln N M —i Out: 472 In: 503 Total: 975 [S] Mt Prospect 1 547 c — M L 101 -1 N U �0 CD LV r- =3 O 223 O Lo 0,0 a- U M 147 o u Q1 Ln r- 583 29 [N] Mt Prospect Total: 959 In: 457 Out: 502 Ln N r-1 1:t r-1 M 00 r N Ln N M —i Out: 472 In: 503 Total: 975 [S] Mt Prospect 1 547 c — M L 101 -1 N U �0 CD LV r- =3 O 223 06 -Central Road & Rand Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979474, Location: 42.066202, -87.92063 fil GEWALT HAMION ASSOCIATES, INC. Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US Leg Central Central Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped" L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped'I Int 2022-08-2711:00AM 0 136 51 1 188 1 7 101 44 0 152 0 46 145 6 0 197 1 33 145 0 0 178 1 715 11:15AM 0 129 50 0 179 1 5 107 52 1 165 0 28 123 4 0 155 0 29 157 0 0 186 1 685 11:30AM 0 114 45 0 159 0 7 82 43 0 132 0 48 167 11 0 226 0 42 161 0 0 203 0 720 11:45AM 0 141 52 0 193 1 12 128 44 0 184 0 67 156 13 0 236 1 31 145 0 0 176 1 789 Hourly Total 0 520 198 1 719 3 31 418 183 1 633 0 189 591 34 0 814 2 135 608 0 0 743 3 2909 12:OOPM 0 117 61 0 178 1 8 117 44 0 169 0 37 118 9 0 164 0 38 169 0 0 207 2 718 12:15PM 0 112 53 0 165 0 9 96 37 0 142 0 52 140 9 0 201 0 28 145 0 0 173 0 681 12:30PM 0 109 52 0 161 0 3 101 49 0 153 2 39 148 9 0 196 0 35 175 1 0 211 0 721 12:45PM 0 117 45 0 162 0 5 138 27 0 170 5 43 133 5 0 181 0 36 151 0 0 187 0 700 Hourly Total 0 455 211 0 666 1 25 452 157 0 634 7 171 539 32 0 742 0 137 640 1 0 778 2 2820 Total 0 975 409 1 1385 4 56 870 340 1 1267 7 360 1130 66 0 1556 2 272 1248 1 0 1521 5 5729 % Approach 0% 70.4% 29.5% 0.1% -- 4.4% 68.7% 26.8% 0.1% -- 23.1% 72.6% 4.2% 0% -- 17.9%82.1% 0.1%0% - % Total 0% 17.0% 7.1 % 0%24.2% 1.0% 15.2% 5.9% 0%22.1% 6.3% 19.7% 1.2% 0% 27.2% 4.7% 21.8% 0%0%26.5% Lights 0 962 404 1 1367 56 860 336 1 1253 355 1118 66 0 1539 271 1235 1 0 1507 5666 % Lights 0% 98.7% 98.8% 100% 98.7% 100% 98.9% 98.8% 100% 98.9% 98.6% 98.9% 100% 0% 98.9% 99.6% 99.0% 100% 0% 99.1% ..98.9% Articulated Trucks 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 11 %Articulated Trucks 0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.2% O% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0.3% 0%0% 0.3% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 9 5 0 14 0 8 4 0 12 5 10 0 0 15 1 9 0 0 10 51 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0.9% 1.2% 0% 1.0% 0% 0.9% 1.2% 0% 0.9% 1.4% 0.9% 0%0% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% 0%0% 0.7% 0.9% Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.1% O% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians .- .- .- .- _ 1 .- .- .- .- .- 6 .- .- .- .- .- 0 .- .- .- .- _ 1 % Pedestrians 2.5.0% ..85.7% 0% 20.0% Bicycles Oil C..r'Osswah< .- .- .- .- .- 3 .- .- .- .- .- 1 1 2 .- .- .- .- .- 4 % Bicycles on CYosswalk 75"'Y' - - 14.311/6 - 10O% - - 80M% *Pedestriafis and Bicycles on Crosswalk. aswalk. l Left, R: Right, T: `T'hru, U: li-Turn 224 06 -Central Road & Rand Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Full Length (11 AM -1 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979474, Location: 42.066202, -87.92063 N M N rl a+ -J N U fu n 4 - Ln 00 M c [N]Rand Total: 2991 In: 1521 Out: 1470 C N N ri N �nuwIDllD1llD�111�1I�y�1�i����I����VUIl�Im11W�Uwu�w��. _ 975 1 • 10 O O ko � M � M � Out: 1713 In: 1556 Total: 3269 [S] Rand 340 r- 870 870 N r -I C � co L 56 00 +-J 1 �! N �0w m ;Af O M 225 06 Central Road & Rand Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 fil GEWALT HAMILTON Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) ASSOCIATES, INC. All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US All Movements ID: 979474, Location: 42.066202, -87.92063 Leg Central Central Rand Rand Direction Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Time L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* L T R U App Ped* Int 2022-08-2711:45AM 0 141 52 0 193 1 12 128 44 0 184 0 67 156 13 0 236 1. 31 145 0 0 176 1 789 12:OOPM 0 117 61 0 178 1 8 117 44 0 169 0 37 118 9 0 164 0 38 169 0 0 207 2 718 12:15PM 0 112 53 0 165 0 9 96 37 0 142 0 52 140 9 0 201 0 28 145 0 0 173 0 681 12:30PM 0 109 52 0 161 0 3 101 49 0 153 2 39 148 9 0 196 0 35 175 1 0 211 0 721 Total 0 479 218 0 697 2 32 442 174 0 648 2 195 562 40 0 797 1 132 634 1 0 767 3 2909 % Approach 0% 68.7% 31.3% 0% - 4.9% 68.2% 26.9% 0% - 24.5% 70.5°/% 5.0% 0% - 17.2% 82.7% 0.1%0% - % Total 0% 16.5% 7.5% 0% 24.0% 1.1% 15.2% 6.0% 0% 22.3% 6.7% 19.3% 1.4% 0% 27.4% 4.5% 21.8% 0% 0% 26.4% PBF - 0.854 0.893 - 0.906 0.667 0.863 0.888 - 0.880 0.728 0.901 0.769 - 0.844 0.868 0.906 0.250 - 0.909 0.923 Lights 0 472 217 0 689 32 438 172 0 642 194 557 40 0 791 131 626 1 0 758 2880 % Lights 0% 98.5% 99.5% 0% 98.9% 100% 99.1% 98.9% 0% 99.1% 99.5% 99.1% 100% 0% 99.2% 99.2% 98.7% 100% 0% 98.80% ..99.0% Articulated Trucks 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 6 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.4% 0%0% 0.30A 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.2% 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0.3% 0%0% 0.3% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 4 1 0 5 0 3 2 0 5 1 4 0 0 5 1 6 0 0 7 22 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0.8% 0.5% 0% 0.7% 0% 0.7% 1.1%0% 0.8% 0.5% 0.7% 0%0% 0.6% 0.8% 0.9% 0%0% 0.9% 0.8% Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0% 0.2% 0%0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% Pedestrians - .. .. 0 2 0 0 %PedesQians - - - - - 0% - - - - - 100°lo - - - - - O% - - - - - 0°lo Bicycles on Crosswalk 2 C) 1 3 1A Bicycles on Crosswalk 100'% 0°l0 100% 100% *Pedestrians and Bicycles c.on Crosswalk. L: Left, R; Right, T: Th 11i, U: 41= I Urn 226 06 -Central Road & Rand Road - TMC Sat Aug 27, 2022 Forced Peak (11:45 AM - 12:45 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 979474, Location: 42.066202, -87.92063 00 m Lo 'n O a + M ro v Ufu 4-1o c 479 218 [N]Rand Total: 1503 In: 767 Out: 736 N � m m 174 Ln N O 0) f.0 1* -i Ln Out: 884 In: 797 Total: 1681 [S] Rand 227 WIN millm EXISTING (2022) CAPACITY REPORTS Jami nl 0 k3 1 1834108(u,3 7 228 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 100: Albert Street & Henry Street AM Peak Hour Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 229 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 10 5 1 10 10 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 5 1 10 10 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 14 13 12 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.90 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.958 0.958 Flt Protected 0.996 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 1903 0 0 1979 1783 0 Flt Permitted 0.996 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 1903 0 0 1979 1783 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1650 156 226 Travel Time (s) 45.4 4.3 6.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 5 1 11 11 5 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 0 12 16 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 13 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.96 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 229 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 100: Albert Street & Henry Street AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Lane Configurations 1� - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 7.2 0 HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 5 1 10 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 5 1 10 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 5 1 11 11 5 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 16 0 27 14 Stage 1 - - 14 Stage 2 - - - - 13 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1602' 988 1066 Stage 1 - - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - 1010 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602 987 1066 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 987 - Stage 1 - - - 1009 Stage 2 - - - - 1009 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 7.2 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 230 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 200: Rand Road & Henry Street AM Peak Hour t 1 Lane Configurations Y tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 5 10 "10 885 1065 1 Future Volume (vph) 5 10 10 885 1065 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 125 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 140 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.907 Flt Protected 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1775 0 1770 3725 3539 0 Flt Permitted 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) , 1775 0 1770 3725 3539 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 106 624 1977 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.6 33.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 11 11 932 1121 1 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 11 932 1122 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 14 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 231 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 200: Rand Road & Henry Street AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations Y - 0.079 - - ) tt -i 24.5 - HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 10 10 885 _1065 1 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 10 885 1065 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 11 11 932 ;1121 1 Conflicting Flow All 1610 561 1122 0 - 0 Stage 1 1122 - Stage 2 488 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14; - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 95 471 618; - Stage 1 273 - - - - - Stage 2 583 - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 93 471 618 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 93 - - - - - Stage 1 268 - Stage 2 583 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.079 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.9 -i 24.5 - HCM Lane LOS B - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 - 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 232 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations tt r tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 20 840 230 0 595 35 290 35 0 25 30 10 Future Volume (vph) 20 840 230 0 595 35 290 35 0 25 30 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 215 120 0 120 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 195 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.976 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.962 0.982 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1642 0 ; 0' 3273 0 Flt Permitted 0.336 0.950 0.962 0.730 Satd. Flow (perm) , 626 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1642 0 ; 0' 2433 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 624 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 10% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 21 884 242 0 626 37 305 37 0 26 32 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 44% Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 884 242 0 626 37 171 171 0 0 69 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 18 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 "9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template' Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov NA Perm Split NA Perm NA 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 233 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 6.5 20.5 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 14.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 50.0 25.0 37.0 37.0 25.0 25.0 15.0 15.0 Total Split (%) 14.4% 55.6% 27.8% 41.1% 41.1% 27.8% 27.8% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 9.5 44.5 19.0 31.0 31.0 19.0 19.0 9.0 9.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 35 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Recall Mode None C -Min None C -Min C -Min None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 50.9 48.9 73.0 44.3 44.3 17.4 17.4 9.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.54 0.81 0.49 0.49 0.19 0.19 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.44 0.19 0.34 0.05 0.54 0.54 0.28 Control Delay 109 14.4 3.1 8.1 7.8 59.7 59.4 40.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.9 14.4 3.1 8.1 7.8 59.7 59.4 40.7 LOS B B A A A E E D Approach Delay 11.9 8.1 59.5 40.7 Approach LOS B A E D Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 172 32 48 5 107 107 19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 217 49 48 m10 176 176 40 Internal Link Dist (ft) 544 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 215 120 120 Base Capacity(vph) 474 2031 1269 1833 779 343 346 248 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced u/c Ratio 0.04 0.44 0.19 0.34 0.05 0.50 0.49 0.28 Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 10 (11 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximumv/c Ratio: 0.54 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 6 234 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour Splits and Phases: 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road 0 2 R) 11 *t04 05 11 06 LR� 09/21/2022 Kirnley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 7 235 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 400: Albert Street & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations +M Traffic Volume (vph) 10 900 5 5 595 5 5 1 5 5 1 10 Future Volume (vph) 10 900 5 5 595 5 5 1 5 5 1 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.999 0.939 0.913 Flt Protected 0.999 0.978 0.986 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3552 0 0 3536 0 0 1711 0 0' 1677 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.978 0.986 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 0 3532 0 0 3536 0 0 1711 0 ; 0' 1677 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1867 199 606 635 Travel Time (s) 36.4 3.9 16.5 17.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 947 5 5 626 5 5 1 5 5 1 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 963 0 0 636 0 0 11 0 0 17 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free free Stop Stop Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.,1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 236 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 400: Albert Street & Central Road AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Lane Configurations 0.067 4� - 0.007 - - 0.061 HCM Control Delay (s) 27.2 8.8 0.1 - 10.1 0.1 - 18.9 HCM Lane LOS D A A Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 900 5 5. 595 5 5 1 5 5 1 10 Future Vol, veh/h 10 900 5 5 595 5 5 1 5 5 1 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 947 5 5 626 5 5 1 5 5 1 11 Conflicting Flow All 631 0 0 952 0 0 1296 1613 476 1135 1613 316 Stage 1 - - - 972 972 - 639 639 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 324 641 - 496 974 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54' 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1, Maneuver 947 - 717 - 120 103 535 157 103 680 i Stage - - - - - - 271 329 - 431 469 - Stage 2 - - - 662 468 - 524' 328 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 947 -i 717 114 99 535 150 99 680 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 114 99 - 150 99 - Stage 1 - - - 264 321 - 420 464 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 643 463 - 504 320 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 0.011 - - 0.007 - - 0.061 HCM Control Delay (s) 27.2 8.8 0.1 - 10.1 0.1 - 18.9 HCM Lane LOS D A A - B A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - 0 - 0.2 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 9 237 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0 tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 95 805 "10 90 535 0 10 230 120 0 200 60 Future Volume (vph) 95 805 10 90 535 0 10 230 120 0 200 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 80 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.998 0.950 0.966 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.999 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 0 1752 3725 0 0 3317 0 0 3314 0 Flt Permitted 0.417 0.271 0.941 Satd. Flow (perm) 777 3532 0 500 3725 0 0 3125 0 0 3314 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 0% 2% 4% 2% 0% 4% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 Adj. Flow (vph) 100 847 11 95 563 0 11 242 126 0 211 63 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 858 0 95 563 0 0 379 0 0 274 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 "9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 Detector Template' Left Thru (Left Thru Left Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA NA 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 10 238 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 6.5 21.0 6.5 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 40.0 15.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.4 Total Split (%) 16.7% 44.4% 16.7% 44.4% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% Maximum Green (s) 11.6 34.0 11.5 34.0 29.0 29.0 29.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 35 6.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Recall Mode None C -Min None C -Min None None None Act Effct Green (s) 56.5 47.6 56.3 47.5 21.3 21.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.53 0.63 0.53 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.46 0.23 0.29 0.51 0.35 Control Delay 74 15.9 6.7 8.7 31.7 26.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.4 15.9 6.7 8.7 31.7 26.7 LOS A B A A C C Approach Delay 15.0 8.4 31.7 26.7 Approach LOS B A C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 157 13 51 98 71 Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 251 26 74 131 100 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 ! 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 Base Capacity (vph) 634 1868 486 1967 1006 1067 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Gap Reductn 0 70 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced u/c Ratio 0.16 0.48 0.20 0.29 0.38 0.26 Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 37 (41 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximumv/c Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 11 239 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour fits and Phases: 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road I 04 05 06 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn 03 Synchro 11 Report Page 12 240 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tt r 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tt Detector 2 Position(ft) Traffic Volume (vph) 0 605 020 30 450 115 175 515 15 120 745 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 605 320 30 450 115 175 515 15 120 745 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 155 100 265 0 90 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 1 1 0 1! 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 110 150 130 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.948 0.850 0.996 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3355 0 1752 3725 1583 1770 3525 0 1770 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.145 0.229 0.383` Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3355 0 267 3725 1583 427 3525 0 713 3725 0 Right Turn on Red, No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 637 337 32 474 121 184 542 16 126 784 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 974 0 32 474 121 184 558 0 126 784 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 1 2 1! 2 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 " 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 13 241 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 211.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 6.5 21.0 6.5 21.0 Total Split (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 13.0 39.0 13.0 39.0 Total Split (%) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 14.4% !43.3% 14.4% 43.3% Maximum Green (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 9.5 33.0 9.5 33.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 Lead/Lag: Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s); 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 44.7 33.2 43.3 32.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.37 0.48 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.33 0.35 0.21 0.53 0.43 0.29 0.58 Control Delay 21.5 32.7 21.8 21.1 17.1 22.7 7.1 13.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.5 32.7 21.8 21.1 17.1 22.7 7.1 13.0 LOS C C C C B C A B Approach Delay 21.5 22.2 21.3 12.2 Approach LOS �!, C C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 271 13 103 47 51 121 10 38 Queue Length 95th (ft) 78 43 144 88 87 170 25 66 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 100 265 90 Base Capacity (vph) 1229 97 1364 579 356 1311 464 1369 Starvation; Cap Reductn 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.79 0.33 0.35 0.21 0.52 0.43 0.27 0.57 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 242 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 15 243 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 100: Albert Street & Henry Street PM Peak Hour Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 244 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 10 5 5 40 25 1 Future Volume (vph) 10 5 5 40 25 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 14 13 12 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.958 0.995 Flt Protected 0.995 0.954 Satd. Flow (prot) 1903 0 0 1926 1827 0 Flt Permitted 0.995 0.954 Satd. Flow (perm) 1903 0 0 1926 1827 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1650 156 226 Travel Time (s) 45.0 4.3 6.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 11 5 5 42 26 1 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 0 47 27 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 13 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1:00 0.92 0.96 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 244 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 100: Albert Street & Henry Street PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Lane Configurations 1� - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 5 5 40 25 1 Future Vol, veh/h 10 5 5 40 25 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 5 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 5 5 42 26 1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 16 0 66 14 Stage 1 - - 14 Stage 2 - - - - 52 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1602' 939 1066 Stage 1 - - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - ; 970 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602 936 1066 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 936 - Stage 1 - - - 1009 Stage 2 - - - - 967 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 245 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 200: Rand Road & Henry Street PM Peak Hour t 1 Lane Configurations Y tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 5 10 35 1240 1260 5 Future Volume (vph) 5 10 35 1240 1260 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 125 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 140 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.907 0.999 Flt Protected 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1775 0 1770 3725 3536 0 Flt Permitted 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) , 1775 0 1770 3725 3536 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 106 624 1977 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.6 33.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 11 37 1305 1326 5 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 37 1305 1331 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 14 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 246 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 200: Rand Road & Henry Street PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Lane Configurations Y - 0.144 - - ) tt -i 43.1 - HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 10 35 1240 1260 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 35 1240 1260 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 11 37 1305 1326 5 Conflicting Flow Al 2056 666 1331 0 - 0 Stage 1 1329 - Stage 2 727 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14; - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 48 402 514 - Stage 1 212 - - - - - Stage 2 439 - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 45 402 514 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 45 - - - - - Stage 1 197 - Stage 2 439 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.072 - 0.144 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 -i 43.1 - HCM Lane LOS B - E - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.5 - 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 247 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 0.0 tt r 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 70 740 435 0 845 100 355 130 0 100 150 75 Future Volume (vph) 70 740 435 0 845 100 355 130 0 100 150 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 215 4 120 0 4 120 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 195 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.965 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.977 0.985 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1671 0 ; 0' 3364 0 Flt Permitted 0.131 0.950 0.977 0.595 Satd. Flow (perm) , 244 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1671 0 ; 0' 2032 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 624 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 74 779 458 0 889 105 374 137 0 105 158 79 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 33% Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 779 458 0 889 105 251 260 0 0 342 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 18 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1! 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 " 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type; pm+pt NA pm+ov NA Perm Split NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 4 6 4 4 3 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 248 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 20.5 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 14.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 50.0 35.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 11.8% 45.5% 31.8% 32.7% 32.7% 31.8% !31.8% 22.7% 22.7% Maximum Green (s) 9.5 44.5 29.0 30.0 30.0 29.0 29.0 19.0 19.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 30 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Recall Mode None C -Min None C -Min C -Min None None None None Act Effct Green (s)'I, 48.8 46.8 78.7 36.6 36.6 26.5 26.5 19.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.43 0.72 0.33 0.33 0.24 0.24 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.49 0.40 0.72 0.20 0.64 0.65 1.57dl Control Delay 23.2 24.8 7.5 23.4 15.2 34.2 34.1 85.3 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.4 0.0 Total Delay 23.2 24.8 7.5 23.4 15.2 35.5 35.5 85.3 LOS C C A C B D D F Approach Delay 18.7 22.6 35.5 85.3 Approach LOS B C D F Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 214 112 316 27 73 75 127 Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 272 165 #377 42 182 187 #223 Internal Link Dist (ft) 544 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 215 120 120 Base Capacity (vph) 239 1583 1123 1240 527 428 440 355 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 7 0 61 65 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.49 0.43 0.72 0.20 0.68 0.69 0.96 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 12;(11 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1 % ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 6 249 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour Splits and Phases: 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road 0 2 R T 03 04 05 06 09/21/2022 Kirnley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 7 250 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 400: Albert Street & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations +M Traffic Volume (vph) 15 810 5 15 1060 15 1 1 15 1 1 10 Future Volume (vph) 15 810 5 15 1060 15 1 1 15 1 1 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.998 0.880 0.886 Flt Protected 0.999 0.999 0.997 0.996 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3532 0 0 3529 0 0 1634 0 0' 1644 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.999 0.997 0.996 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 0 3532 0 0 3529 0 0 1634 0 ; 0' 1644 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1867 199 606 635 Travel Time (s) 36.4 3.9 16.5 17.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 16 853 5 16 1116 16 1 1 16 1 1 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 874 0 0 1148 0 0 18 0 0 13 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free free Stop Stop Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 251 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 400: Albert Street & Central Road PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations 0.063 0.026 - 4� - 0.061 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.4 11 0.3 9.7 0.3 - 23.6 HCM Lane LOS C B A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 810 5 15 _ 1060 15 1 1 15 1! 1 10 Future Vol, veh/h 15 810 5 15 1060 15 1 1 15 1 1 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 853 5 16 1116 16 1 1 16 1i 1 11 Conflicting Flow Al 1132 0 0 858 0 0 1479 2052 429 1615 2046 566 Stage 1 - - - 888 888 - 1156 1156 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 591 1164 - 459 890 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54' 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1, Maneuver 613 - 779 - 87 55 574 69 55 467 Stage 1 - - - - - - 305 360 - 209 269 - Stage 2 - - - 460 267 - 551 359 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 613 -i 779 77 49 574 61! 49 467 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 77 49 - 61 49 - Stage 1 - - - 290 342 - 199 254 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 423 252 - 507 341 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.026 - - 0.02 - - 0.061 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.4 11 0.3 9.7 0.3 - 23.6 HCM Lane LOS C B A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.2 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 9 252 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0 tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 150 655 "20 130 840 0 25 335 , 125 0 360 225 Future Volume (vph) 150 655 20 130 840 0 25 335 125 0 360 225 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 80 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.996 0.961 0.942 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 0 1770 3725 0 0 3391 0 0 3334 0 Flt Permitted 0.241 0.322 0.858 Satd. Flow (perm) 449 3525 0 600 3725 0 0 2918 0 0 3334 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 158 689 21 137 884 0 26 353 132 0 379 237 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 158 710 0 137 884 0 0 511 0 0 616 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 "9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 10 253 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 6.5 21.0 6.5 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 51.0 21.0 58.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 12.7% 46.4% 19.1% 52.7% 34.5% 34.5% 34.5% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 40.0 17.5 X52.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.4 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 35 6.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Recall Mode None C -Min None C -Min None None None Act Effct Green (s) 66.0 54.3 65.7 54.2 31.2 31.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.49 0.60 0.49 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.41 0.30 0.48 0.62 0.65 Control Delay 12.3 19.3 8.6 17.2 37.6 31.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 4.1 Total Delay 12.3 10.4 8.6 17.7 37.6 35.2 LOS B B A B D D Approach ',Delay 18.1 16.5 37.6 35.2 Approach LOS B B D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 44 168 40 199 160 154 Queue Length 95th (ft) 71 221 m36 150 221 m253 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 ! 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 Base Capacity (vph) 400 1741 564 1860 873 997 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 518 0 293 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 210 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced u/c Ratio 0.40 0.46 0.24 0.66 0.59 0.88 Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 32 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum'v/c Ratio: 0.65 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 11 254 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour fits and Phases: 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road I 04 .4- 05 s 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn 08 Synchro 11 Report Page 12 255 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0 tt r 0 tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 530 250 30 645 160 325 785 45 140 700 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 530 250 30 645 160 325 785 45 140 700 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 155 100 265 0 90 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 1 1 0 1! 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 110 150 130 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.952 0.850 0.992 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3369 0 1770 3725 1583 1770 3511 0 1770 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.184 0.272 0.228 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3369 0 343 3725 1583 507 3511 0 425 3725 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 558 263 32 679 168 342 826 47 147 737 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 821 0 32 679 168 342 873 0 : 147 737 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 "9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template` Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 2 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 13 256 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 6.5 21.0 6.5 21.0 Total Split (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 13.0 48.0 18.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 11.8% 43.6% 16.4% 48.2% Maximum Green (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 9.5 42.0 14.5 47.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 36.9 36.9 36.9 36.9 60.5 47.8 58.7 46.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.55 0.43 0.53 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.28 0.54 0.32 0.84 0.57 0.42 0.47 Control Delay 30.7 33.9 31.4 28.8 36.9 26.0 17.8 11.5 Queue Delay 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.2 33.9 31.4 28.8 36.9 26.1 17.8 11.5 LOS C C C C D C B B Approach ',Delay 34.2 31.0 29.1 12.5 Approach LOS C C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 293 16 200 86 122 243 20 58 Queue Length 95th (ft) 352 46 258 143 #270 324 m62 m70 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 100 265 90 Base Capacity(vph) 1164 118 1287 547 407 1524 418 1603 Starvation Cap Reductn 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced u/c Ratio 0.89 0.27 0.53 0.31 0.84 0.60 0.35 0.46 Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum'v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.7% ICU Level of Service O Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 257 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 15 258 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 100: Albert Street & Henry Street Saturday Midday Peak Hour Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 259 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 10 5 5 30 10 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 5 5 30 10 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 14 13 12 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.90 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.958 0.958 Flt Protected 0.993 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 1903 0 0 1973 1783 0 Flt Permitted 0.993 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 1903 0 0 1973 1783 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1650 156 226 Travel Time (s) 45.4 4.3 6.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 5 5 32 11 5 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 0 37 16 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 13 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.96 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 259 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 100: Albert Street & Henry Street Saturday Midday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Lane Configurations 1� - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 5 5 30 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 5 5 30 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 5 5 32 ; 11 5 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 16 0 56 14 Stage 1 - - 14 Stage 2 - - - - 42 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1602' 952 1066 Stage 1 - - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - ; 980 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602 949 1066 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 949 - Stage 1 - - - 1009 Stage 2 - - - - 977 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 260 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 200: Rand Road & Henry Street Saturday Midday Peak Hour t 1 Lane Configurations Y tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 5 10 "20 1075 1045 15 Future Volume (vph) 5 10 20 1075 1045 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 125 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 140 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.907 0.998 Flt Protected 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1775 0 1770 3725 3532 0 Flt Permitted 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) , 1775 0 1770 3725 3532 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 106 624 1977 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.6 33.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 11 21 1132 1100 16 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 21 1132 1116 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 14 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 261 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 200: Rand Road & Henry Street Saturday Midday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Lane Configurations Y HCM Control Delay (s) 11 ) tt - D - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 10 20 1075 1045 15 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 20 1075 1045 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 11 21 1132 ;1100 16 Conflicting Flow Al 1716 558 1116 0 - 0 Stage 1 1108 - Stage 2 608 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14; - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 81 473 622' - Stage 1 278 - - - - - Stage 2 506 - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 78 473 622 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 78 - - - - - Stage 1 269 - Stage 2 506 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - 0.09 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 11 -i 27.5 - HCM Lane LOS B - D - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 - 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 262 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 0.0 tt r 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 105 685 290 0 650 100 325 180 0 ; 85 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 105 685 290 0 650 100 325 180 0 85 170 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 215 4 120 0 4 120 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 195 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.952 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.989 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1685 0 ; 0' 3332 0 Flt Permitted 0.233 0.950 0.985 0.596 Satd. Flow (perm) , 434 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1685 0 ; 0' 2008 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 624 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 111 721 305 0 684 105 342 189 0 89 179 126 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 24% Lane Group Flow (vph) 111 721 305 0 684 105 260 271 0 0 394 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 18 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1! 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 " 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type; pm+pt NA pm+ov NA Perm Split NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 4 6 4 4 3 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 263 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 20.5 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 14.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 49.0 33.0 36.0 36.0 33.0 33.0 18.0 18.0 Total Split (%) 13.0% 49.0% 33.0% 36.0% 36.0% 03.0% !33.0% 18.0% 18.0% Maximum Green (s) 9.5 43.5 27.0 30.0 30.0 27.0 27.0 12.0 12.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 30 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Recall Mode None C -Min None C -Min C -Min None None None None Act Effct Green (s)'I, 46.4 44.4 74.1 31.9 31.9 24.2 24.2 13.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.44 0.74 0.32 0.32 0.24 0.24 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.44 0.26 0.58 0.21 0.66 0.67 1.41 Control Delay 19.0 20.4 4.6 26.5 20.7 29.0 28.9 240.5 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.0 20.4 4.6 26.5 20.7 30.0 29.9 240.5 LOS B C A C C C C F Approach Delay 16.0 25.7 30.0 240.5 Approach LOS B C C F Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 165 47 221 58 64 66 -192 Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 215 74 288 86 152 157 #288 Internal Link Dist (ft) 544 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 215 120 120 Base Capacity (vph) 328 1653 1165 1189 505 438 454 279 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 50 54 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.44 0.27 0.58 0.21 0.67 0.68 1.41 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 12;(12°/x), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.41 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 6 264 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing /7022\Traffic Volumes 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 300: NK Prospect Road & Rand Road O0/21/2022 Svnohmn Report 265 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 400: Albert Street & Central Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations +M Traffic Volume (vph) 10 740 5 10 675 5 10 1 20 1 1 10 Future Volume (vph) 10 740 5 10 675 5 10 1 20 1 1 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.999 0.914 0.886 Flt Protected 0.999 0.999 0.984 0.996 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3532 0 0 3532 0 0 1675 0 0' 1644 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.999 0.984 0.996 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 0 3532 0 0 3532 0 0 1675 0 ; 0' 1644 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1867 199 606 635 Travel Time (s) 36.4 3.9 16.5 17.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 779 5 11 711 5 11 1 21 1 1 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 795 0 0 727 0 0 33 0 0 13 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free free Stop Stop Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 390% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 266 HCM 6th TWSC Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 400: Albert Street & Central Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations 0.121 4� - 0.013 - - 0.034 HCM Control Delay (s) 20.2 9.1 0.1 9.4 0.1 - 14.9 HCM Lane LOS C A A Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 740 5 10 675 5 10 1 20 1! 1 10 Future Vol, veh/h 10 740 5 10 675 5 10 1 20 1 1 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 779 5 11 711 5 11 1 21 1i 1 11 Conflicting Flow All 716 0 0 784 0 0 1182 1542 392 1148 1542 358 Stage 1 - - - 804 804 - 736 736 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 378 738 - 412 806 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54' 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 880 - 830 - 145 1.14 607 154 114 638 Stage - - - - - - 343 394 - 377 423 - Stage 2 - - - 616 422 - 588 393 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 880 - 830 137 109 607 143 109 638 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 137 109 - 143 109 - Stage 1 - - - 335 385 - 369 414 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 591 413 - 554 384 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.121 0.012 - - 0.013 - - 0.034 HCM Control Delay (s) 20.2 9.1 0.1 9.4 0.1 - 14.9 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - 0 - 0.1 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 9 267 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0 tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 145 585 30 100 545 0 30 360 120 0 345 115 Future Volume (vph) 145 585 30 100 545 0 30 360 120 0 345 115 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 80 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.993 0.965 0.962 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3514 0 1770 3725 0 0 3405 0 0 3405 0 Flt Permitted 0.378 0.376 0.894 Satd. Flow (perm) 704 3514 0 700 3725 0 0 3053 0 0 3405 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 153 616 32 105 574 0 32 379 126 0 363 121 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 153 648 0 105 574 0 0 537 0 0 484 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 "9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 10 268 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 6.5 21.0 6.5 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 41.0 24.0 51.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 14.0% 41.0% 24.0% 51.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 35.0 20.5 45.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 35 6.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Recall Mode None C -Min None C -Min None None None Act Effct Green (s) 60.8 50.7 58.3 47.9 27.7 27.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.51 0.58 0.48 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.36 0.21 0.32 0.63 0.51 Control Delay 9.7 16.9 7.0 11.5 35.2 23.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 Total Delay 9.7 16.9 7.0 11.5 35.2 24.8 LOS A B A B D C Approach Delay 15.6 10.8 35.2 24.8 Approach LOS B B D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 38 135 20 74 154 126 Queue Length 95th (ft) 65 185 32 90 211 m155 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 ! 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 Base Capacity (vph) 545 1783 658 1805 904 1008 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 319 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced u/c Ratio 0.28 0.36 0.16 0.32 0.59 0.70 Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 31 (31 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum'v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 11 269 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour fits and Phases: 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road I --- 05 , 06 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn t08 Synchro 11 Report Page 12 270 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0 tt r 0 tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 485 220 30 450 180 195 570 40 130 640 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 485 220 30 450 180 195 570 40 130 640 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 155 100 265 0 90 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 1 1 0 1! 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 110 150 130 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.953 0.850 0.990 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3373 0 1770 3725 1583 1770 3504 0 1770 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.237 0.314 0.332 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3373 0 441 3725 1583 585 3504 0 618 3725 0 Right Turn on Red, No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 511 232 32 474 189 205 600 42 137 674 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 743 0 32 474 189 205 642 0 : 137 674 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 "9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template` Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 2 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 13 271 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Midday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 6.5 21.0 6.5 21.0 Total Split (s) 40.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 13.0 33.0 24.0 44.0 Total Split (%) 43.0% 43.0% 43.0% 43.0% 13.0% 33.0% 24.0% 44.0% Maximum Green (s) 37.0 67.0 37.0 37.0 9.5 27.0 20.5 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2 52.8 41.0 52.9 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.53 0.41 0.53 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.21 0.37 0.35 0.49 0.45 0.32 0.44 Control Delay 22.6 26.3 25.3 26.0 16.0 23.6 12.5 14.6 Queue Delay 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.9 26.3 25.3 26.0 16.0 23.6 12.5 14.6 LOS C C C C B C B B Approach Delay 22.9 25.5 21.8 14.3 Approach LOS C C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 223 14 114 86 64 157 29 79 Queue Length 95th (ft) 276 38 154 142 106 223 m53 m94 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 100 265 90 Base Capacity (vph) 1248 163 1378 585 425 1437 584 1528 Starvation Cap Reductn 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.20 X0.34 0.32 0.48 0.45 0.23 0.44 Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 272 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road Existing (2022) Traffic Volumes Saturday Midday Peak Hour 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 15 273 WIN millm DATA FROM THE ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, 11TH EDITION Jan uan �.1 :� '1 41 80 274 Land Use: 934 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window Description This land use includes any fast-food restaurant with a drive-through window. This type of restaurant is characterized by a large drive-through and large carry -out clientele, long hours of service (some are open for breakfast, all are open for lunch and dinner, some are open late at night or 24 hours a day) and high turnover rates for eat -in customers. The restaurant does not provide table service. A patron generally orders from a menu board and pays before receiving the meal. A typical duration of stay for an eat -in patron is less than 30 minutes. Fast casual restaurant (Land Use 930), high -turnover (sit-down) restaurant (Land Use 932), fast-food restaurant without drive-through window (Land Use 933), and fast-food restaurant with drive-through window and no indoor seating (Land Use 935) are related uses. Additional Data Users should exercise caution when applying statistics during the AM peak periods, as the sites contained in the database for this land use may or may not be open for breakfast. In cases where it was confirmed that the sites were not open for breakfast, data for the AM peak hour of the adjacent street traffic were removed from the database. If the restaurant has outdoor seating, its area is not included in the overall gross floor area. For a restaurant that has significant outdoor seating, the number of seats may be more reliable than GFA as an independent variable on which to establish a trip generation rate. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- ................................................................................ . and -parking -generation/). ...................................... The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alaska, Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 163, 164, 168, 180, 181, 241, 245, 278, 294, 300, 301, 319, 338, 340, 342, 358, 389, 438, 502, 552, 577, 583, 584, 617, 640, 641, 704, 715, 728, 810, 866, 867, 869, 885, 886, 927, 935, 962, 977, 1050, 1053, 1054 724 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 •t- 275 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window (934) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 71 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 3 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 467.48 98.89 - 1137.66 238.62 Data Plot and Equation 5000 4000 n 3000 C W N a F u H 2000 1000 00 2 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given 4 6 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 8 10 - - - - - Average Rate R2= —* itu�' General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 725 276 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window (934) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 96 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 4 Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 44.61 1.05 - 164.25 27.14 Data Plot and Equation 500 400 U) 300 C W N a F u H 200 100 X X 00 2 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given 4 6 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 726 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 8 10 - - - - - Average Rate R2= —* 277 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window (934) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 190 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 3 Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 33.03 8.77 - 117.22 17.59 Data Plot and Equation 400 300 U) C W N a F 200 i H 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site - - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R2= —* itu�' General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 727 278 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window (934) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Saturday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 17 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 3 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 616.12 218.91 - 1410.88 320.90 Data Plot and Equation 4000 3000 U) C W N a F 2000 i H 110I0IO2 00 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given 2 4 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 730 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 - - - - - Average Rate R2= —* 6 .tom 279 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window (934) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 53 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 4 Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 55.25 11.25 - 122.92 24.62 Data Plot and Equation 400 300 U) W a F 200 u H 100 00 2 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X 4 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 8 - - - - - Average Rate R2= —* itu�' General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 731 280 X i i X i X i X i X X i X X X �> X i X XX X X X XX X Y X X X� X X X X XX X 'X' Xx XX XX X X .� X X X .X X X ., .' X X 00 2 X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X 4 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 6 8 - - - - - Average Rate R2= —* itu�' General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 731 280 WIN millm DATA FROM THE ITE TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 3RD EDITION Jaminl/ "IE:,83; 8341 80 281 282 Vehicle Pass -By Rates by Land Use Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Land Use Code 934 Land Use Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window Setting General Urban/Suburban Time Period Weekday AM Peak Period # Data Sites 5 Average Pass -By Rate 50% Pass -By Characteristics for Individual Sites State or Province Survey Year Pass -By Non -Pass -By Trips # Interviews Trip (%) Primary (%) Diverted (%) Total (%) Adj Street Peak Hour Volume Source GFA (000) 1.4 Kentucky 1993 — 62 22 16 38 1407 2 3 Kentucky 1993 — 43 14 43 57 2903 2 3.3 -- 1996 — 68 — — 32 — 21 3.6 Kentucky 1993 — 32 47 21 68 437 2 4.2 Indiana 1993 — 46 23 31 54 1049 2 282 283 Vehicle Pass -By Rates by Land Use Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Land Use Code 934 Land Use Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window Setting General Urban/Suburban Time Period Weekday PM Peak Period # Data Sites 11 Average Pass -By Rate 55% Pass -By Characteristics for Individual Sites State or Province Survey Year Pass -By Non -Pass -By Trips # Interviews Trip (%) Primary (%) Diverted (%) Total (%) Adj Street Peak Hour Volume Source GFA (000) 1.3 Kentucky 1993 — 68 22 10 32 2055 2 1.9 Kentucky 1993 33 67 24 9 33 2447 2 2.8 Florida 1995 47 66 — — 34 — 30 2.9 Florida 1996 271 41 41 18 59 — 30 3 Kentucky 1993 — 31 31 38 69 4250 2 3.1 Florida 1995 28 71 — — 29 — 30 3.1 Florida 1996 29 38 — — 62 — 30 3.2 Florida 1996 202 40 39 21 60 — 30 3.3 — 1996 — 62 — — 38 — 21 4.2 Indiana 1993 — 56 25 19 44 1632 2 4.3 Florida 1994 304 62 — — 38 — 30 283 WIN millm RAND ROAD I CENTRAL ROAD 1 MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD INTERSECTION DESIGN STUDY Jaminl/ "IE:,83; 8341 80 284 285 VZV1d 3S (INV 10 N01133SH31NI MH 1VHIN33 3111 HO1 133HS S01 33S ����••� -ti uuuum uuuni� o " OC �X'9Sj. Qo3 q 1 J,cr a z. Is 4z� 0 / Vo i +r c III nA ( /y 14J /I Os,M £I IF 47 a �m v w �Q a� tiN 11 } a O Im 0 z n + w 0a F w4 a - �•Kovv � or¢ ^+m �= r "I�/' 141Itcl f.. w4Morv000a���� � ^'o �nms e` o t r, N +_ aaa--wa��aa a A / $ Qom` =q �p rvr SSv 95 _c p P -,LC I zm O............................iiu��C' N Y o t E ow 133dS081d1.V111W f o� O� z a w .. m � o 00 ¢_ no �q N/ — ag rv'orvry as �� hJe= ia. Im �d o ¢wU o + w�N a � a¢ 40 Ili z" a � Z w w V 2 /A �F O ryb0H0 2�2 r y�P�'�� I a' � N n;n ry e . 22 oP J J I 1' r w ry z . —W-1''.11 131 —1. 3a, ,a-, 3,a.b.,-,.�w3-a.„.ml 1 ............. &1., 3amm,�m�„� . 3r 3,,, d — — — — — — — ------------------- 285 d N co O) cif@f;.5`EC-*i.'..._:% —=Iia. —MICE INTERSECTION DESIGN STUDY FAP ROUTE 334 (US 12/ RAND ROAD) NORTH LEG FAU 2606 MITH (MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD] SOUTH LEG: FAU 2606 (MOUNT PROSPECT WADI SEC. N0. PREPARED HY: B� or PROJ. M Ea PRDJ. ENG. F. NEMES SCALE. SJN COUNTY COON PROJ. N0. I.O.S. SHEET 2 OF 11 11E 11. ELBAENTS CONTROLLING DESIGN >aMEEi= 3u RE €TT MAMM Lsr�lt <;a eBEET RO SR c x fO'T� C` A.4` FI `A � C T R �AIV� AkTE€FU kti si,^k yes EX[FTlW,APT sR "Dk [y,T t1c A°T P92GNYEANADT. 2i�T@ 'aN4'R N - ., ' Rei e - t 4IT CLF CEWR,AL ROAD, 20500 :M; ODYN OF CENTRAL. RDDL Kai ROUT€'.,�WR 13€ EXWMWh —� #2 (TOF R`AAQR I ,ate; ,OFR<alc FOAD, uKE=D R4u E MAWR. 1 SRAROU-M No asov'MrIN Ho NVEA.RADT Q EAST OF PAND RW 9103 WFST OF RAW RDAG. RK-OSEDFIDSTEDSPEED 354£41 FAMP140ENMAEER MSW FROSPECTRDt WA7XEDRQUFEAiLRWR, KCNE STREU MIT VROSECT ID L E,77 A KSIE ml MkOR COLLECT OE.fMCI-T 3RD, t0E-A,L ROAD TMEft-p -r-VINDPITT i3Q0VPOfN4MwTPROSKCTRM DEWNYEARAM;z.$6 }'€]'q T HALL ENtj D1 ; A €I iP DESKU SEs sE'-: H € - P CT RM R — D.FIX TEO €D 30- '( PRQSPO-F AR�WOVAAEWT _R E -D TEAR c l4- x:T`Ov Q5 DESHO T3.E gW�E3 k4ff?F EhCRQ_: V§&f,5 MALL Eb: t. -11tou Em04e TR" ROL6TE 3--r�-ATC.- €LAA;�p€DANS RD) ff—dfFRREDROLP "tS RMa=E 12, G RI SES ROW -r W R• C) T Ra CETTPSL RD a: . �T D SNA- --Rr3 MIA WT SR Ems. C.WF+TCA 49 GERAL NOT€ TYTE "24 CLQ AACL W-1 ER O €T-3IO F -€a. `tat.acA =v e is E &- .12 iQ`RD "r€it G-4 T ACw °m-(€ Fn': T &C21 C URB MiD CyTE.R ON IFe SE R r3LAADS. ALL MAENS NS &RE 1=E OF PAe '.MW— MILE OTI RAM PIDTED. TFE R*at Cf my uLITSARE MALI Y. DES -GN 4 1E-ZWFS ARE MMOMMATEC 4 ;10323S TWS OF WIPK WeRSECTICNRE TFtCTAM R4kVVWkVW Fes'.A TRAF€`C SGW�RELOCATOk WTERSECTYiN DEAN EACEV€ D . C.ETNALSA, `T. tbr�; alLtIS€LI-LOSD E$TR V— --QOs Fes —. a efi Owl -6E 45 LDS --a --,PAA; � F k ,' a aa LT. Am & ") LOS E V-- Lm D iT=ED E£E TsREBs�T_-�FTRa�zJFa. ?at FTisi Ir TAFER W TAPER �RM9= VG t FTR€C% D Fa, sib.-hOF l�i': ZT4 'S 'M �G O NO AT *AFER LEI fg F €R VS 4' -FEO umoit W-,Mc'T A7 RAL .M-s"E TT AEGKIR€Ci LIE 2 A'Mut T MSPECT SEB Lr AM LCS E VS LOS LT LF S.TORAM LaN'uTn UA FT E V5DE0 JS �95 FT AM-ME`a.. PS#1 T TARMPAMHWI.TRVq 121 FT R€OLER€€t. SES LT VS X. -C. O'r. ir;T FR PD -�TO � 32 MQ- Vs --DEC. c SRF FANLT §€ —QSEvStOSC hYs LT -i`—jz;. LGI. lF=. , c. W lT 13 Q ELI W- STOR>PCE LITH 3 ase MWDED VS RRECH ARM E9 Ra. TAPERLE.'"€TM 99 FT PROWDEE GF{.DFT PMEDLWED ',A6 €T TAE LEND i+ "EFT €R€ MAD Na. Vt FT RET7 €0 SEB sTT 4T: ;•Te"E46ER TOES ;;5SY � ET �D =RSD &s + - W'sDLw iTuNs ZG ED PROMIED, _`SQ ED RE 4Es7 NES AND SEM kEDM TN ZI F. PRDVIDED VSM FT KOIARED WE MOW%Tri MOLWARLE AT TC. TTAPEPi ID'EC is ii OL 5E8E y.IT LT TiMAT Y s FT PROMll'S 23 FEL` AWLIRM wS AM SER-D"PM -La =.RL -csEPARRTONaE-t PWVoEu,,l$ 'FT REoURED r sF cr M h-, �iL Tr L5 2a 610ty. 15�CE G, M E I VE I I D C L- .a -- k� M0 N co ADT R€DTES ALL d.YaL �,N£D RA WS AS SHOVOR ARE NCOMPLPL VffK7teAWPX-WWrT-�ACT WVIStiT" If NOT A .5% LOCATION E.:4itlU iI.1 El0 t` C06E.TS DF i it N,. RCONNE CTE �AERS€C MTS 12 �FANo, 3 CE MW RED. €F 34 Ru. Aki -P-K a RD W. +? Y ? b #3T. cRos--cl M D�,�€' E� i n RRfE i}� f�EE �€€sRsE.v fIC3Ki.Ih� � iJ`£ENTRLSLLEa. '!� Ct]h �St .Ek iD.. MCI ] Lm, P9.!. M.59 40 INTERSECTION DESIGN STUDY FAP ROUTE 334 (US 12/ RAND ROAD) MITH NORTH LEG FAU ME (MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD] SOUTH LEG FAU 2606 (MOUNT PROSPECT ROADI SEC. NO. PREPARED HY: JE C HIS O [ ..m[HImG L B SCALE: COUNT x COON SJN IR d. N0. PROJ. M Ea PRDJ. ENG. F. NEMES I.-. SHEET 3 01 11 11E 11. FUTURE (2028) NO -BUILD CAPACITY REPORTS Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour Jami nl 0 k3 1 i� ;;4`108( E3 7 288 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street AM Peak Hour Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 289 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 10 5 1 10 10 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 5 1 10 10 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 14 13 12 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.90 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.958 0.958 Flt Protected 0.996 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 1903 0 0 1979 1783 0 Flt Permitted 0.996 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 1903 0 0 1979 1783 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1650 156 226 Travel Time (s) 45.4 4.3 6.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 5 1 11 11 5 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 0 12 16 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 13 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.96 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 289 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Lane Configurations 1� - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 7.2 0 HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 5 1 10 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 5 1 10 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 5 1 11 11 5 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 16 0 27 14 Stage 1 - - 14 Stage 2 - - - - 13 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1602' 988 1066 Stage 1 - - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - 1010 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602 987 1066 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 987 - Stage 1 - - - 1009 Stage 2 - - - - 1009 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 7.2 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 290 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street AM Peak Hour t 1 Lane Configurations Y tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 5 10 "10 915 1130 1 Future Volume (vph) 5 10 10 915 1130 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 125 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 140 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.907 Flt Protected 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1775 0 1770 3725 3539 0 Flt Permitted 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) , 1775 0 1770 3725 3539 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 106 624 1977 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.6 33.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 11 11 963 1189 1 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 11 963 1190 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 14 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 291 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations Y - 0.088 - - ) tt -i 26.9 - HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 10 10 915 _1130 1 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 10 915 1130 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 11 11 963 1189 1 Conflicting Flow All 1694 595 1190 0 - 0 Stage 1 1190 - Stage 2 504 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14; - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 84 447 582, - Stage 1 251 - - - - - Stage 2 572 - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 82 447 582 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 82 - - - - - Stage 1 246 - Stage 2 572 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.088 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.3 -i 26.9 - HCM Lane LOS B - D - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 - 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 292 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations tt r tt r r Traffic Volume (vph) 20 865 265 0 615 35 300 35 0 0 0 10 Future Volume (vph) 20 865 265 0 615 35 300 35 0 0 0 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 238 120 0 120 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 200 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1642 0 ; 0' 0 1611, Flt Permitted 0.270 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow (perm) , 503 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1642 0 ; 0' 0 1611, Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 624 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 10% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 21 911 279 0 647 37 316 37 0 0 0 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 44% Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 911 279 0 647 37 177 176 0 0 0 11, Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 30 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 "9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template' Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru ; Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Turn Type pm+pt NA custom NA Perm Split NA Over 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 293 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour LanAonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (fit) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Turn Type 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 6 294 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Permitted Phases 2 23 12 Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 15.0 Total Split (%) 10.0% 38.0% 38.0% 38.0% 10.0% Maximum Green (s) 11.5 51.0 51.0 51.0 11.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max C -Max C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 65.0 51.0 150.0 51.0 51.0 74.5 74.5 11.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.34 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.50 0.50 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.72 0.18 0.51 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.09 Control Delay 24.3 47.2 0.2 16.9 15.2 9.9 9.8 66.3 Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.6 1.5 00 Total Delay 24.3 47.2 0.2 17.0 15.2 11.4 11.3 66.3 LOS C D A B B B B E Approach Delay 36.0 16.9 11.4 66.3 Approach LOS D B B E Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 410 0 79 8 135 134 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 489 0 94 17 182 ! 178 32 Internal Link Dist (ft) 544 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 238 120 120 Base Capacity (vph) 315 1266 1580 1266 538 804 812 123 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 84 0 466 474 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.72 0.18 0.55 0.07 0.52 0.52 0.09 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced, to phase 2:EBWB and 6i, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Service A 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 295 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 33.0 9.5 9.5 31.0 9.5 22.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 42.0 15.0 28.0 50.0 14.0 14.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 10% 28% 10% 19% 33% 9% 9% 33% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 35.0 10.5 24.5 44.0 10.5 10.5 44.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None None Max None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 89.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s); Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (fit) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 296 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour Analysis Period (min) 15 its and Phases: 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road 02 09 1 IN_ 0 12 #500#1600 ' 590#M:i00 ]#500#600J#500#600J#500#600 500#600 1� * � 06 , R) 1'\10. w 1f 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 9 297 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations +M Traffic Volume (vph) 10 930 5 5 610 5 5 1 5 5 1 10 Future Volume (vph) 10 930 5 5 610 5 5 1 5 5 1 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.999 0.939 0.913 Flt Protected 0.999 0.978 0.986 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3532 0 0 3536 0 0 1711 0 0' 1677 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.978 0.986 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 0 3532 0 0 3536 0 0 1711 0 ; 0' 1677 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1867 199 606 635 Travel Time (s) 36.4 3.9 16.5 17.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 979 5 5 642 5 5 1 5 5 1 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 995 0 0 652 0 0 11 0 0 17 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free free Stop Stop Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 10 298 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Lane Configurations 0.071 4� - 0.008 - - 0.064 HCM Control Delay (s) 28.8 8.9 0.1 - 10.2 0.1 - 19.7 HCM Lane LOS D A A Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 930 5 5. 610 5 5 1 5 5 1 10 Future Vol, veh/h 10 930 5 5 610 5 5 1 5 5 1 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 979 5 5 642 5 5 1 5 5 1 11 Conflicting Flow All 647 0 0 984 0 0 1336 1661 492 1167 1661 324 Stage 1 - - - 1904 1004 - 655 655 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 332 657 - 512 1006 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54' 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1, Maneuver 934 - 698 - 112 96 522 149 96 672 Stage - - - - - - 259 318 - 421 461 - Stage 2 - - - 655 460 - 513 317 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 934 - 698 106 92 522 142 92 672 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 106 92 - 142 92 - Stage 1 - - - 252 310 - 410 456 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 636 455 - 493 309 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.071 0.011 - - 0.008 - - 0.064 HCM Control Delay (s) 28.8 8.9 0.1 - 10.2 0.1 - 19.7 HCM Lane LOS D A A - B A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - 0 - 0.2 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 11 299 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 tt r Detector 1 Delay (s) tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 100 830 "10 95 550 0 10 235 , 125 0 205 60 Future Volume (vph) 100 830 10 95 550 0 10 235 125 0 205 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 185 Detector 2 Extend (s) 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 Turn Type, 0 1 pm+pt 1; 0 NA 1, Taper Length (ft) 25 Protected Phases 13 80 513 512 73 7 14 56 13 25 13 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 + 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 0 1752 3725 0 1770 3471 1583 0 3471 1583 Flt Permitted 0.316 0.098 0.603 Satd. Flow (perm) 589 3532 0 181 3725 0 1123 3471 1583 0 3471 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 0% 2% 4% 2% 0% 4% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 105 874 11 100 579 0 11 247 132 0 216 63 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 105 885 0 100 579 0 11 247 132 0 216 63 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 " 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, custom NA pm+pt NA D.P+P NA custom NA pm+ov Protected Phases 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 56 13 6 14 13 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 12 300 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour LanAonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm); Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(f) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type', Protected Phases 2 3 5 6 9 12 14 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 13 301 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour 4- i Detector Phase 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 56 13 6 14 13 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 14.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 20.0 9.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 14.0 50.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 9.3% 33.3% 10.0% 9.3% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 44.0 10.5 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.5 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 68.9 44.4 65.9 56.4 57.1 19.6 95.1 43.6 62.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.30 0.44 0.38 0.38 0.13 0.63 0.29 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.85 0.35 0.41 0.02 0.55 0.13 0.21 0.10 Control Delay 14.2 58.4 32.6 22.4 12.6 51.7 11.3 20.7 14.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.2 58.4 32.6 22.7 12.6 51.7 11.3 20.7 14.3 LOS B E C C B D B C B Approach Delay 53.7 24.1 36.9 19.3 Approach LOS D C D B Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 431 40 221 4 102 49 42 22 Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 519 m65 281 12 144 78 60 41 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 ! 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 185 145 Base Capacity(vph) 353 1046 289 1401 472 462 1002 1018 659 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 305 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.85 0.35 0.53 0.02 0.53 0.13 0.21 0.10 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 302 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 14.0 6.5 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 10.0 10.0 33.0 9.5 31.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 57.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 28.0 50.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 38% 10`% 10% 28% 19% 33% 9% Maximum Green (s) 51.0 11.5 10.5 36.0 24.5 44.0 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 70 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None None C -Max None Max None Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 35.0 39.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Sgillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 15 303 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal its and Phases: 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road 02 09 1 IN_ 0 12 #500#1600 #519I0#M:i0iCIS�Io 6�Id e 510iCI',�"`1600 ,*510}o#1500 #5iCSI0#15100 4- + � 06,(R 1' JA_ \10.0 1 1 143 1f 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 16 304 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 tt r 0.0 0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 625 030 30 465 120 180 530 15 125 740 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 625 330 30 465 120 180 530 15 125 740 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 Detector 2 Extend (s) 115 125 0.0 253 235 0.0 0 185 Turn Type, 0 Storage Lanes 0 custom 1 1 Prot 1 2! 1316 0 1! 3 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 36 115 300 145 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.996 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1752 3725 1583 3433 3525 0 3433 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.262 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 483 3725 1583 3433 3525 0 3433 3725 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 658 347 32 489 126 189 558 16 132 779 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 658 347 32 489 126 189 574 0 132 779 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1! 2 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 " 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, NA custom D.P+P NA custom Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 17 305 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm); Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(f) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type', Protected Phases 6 9 12 13 16 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 18 306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 19 307 --p- t i PermittedPhases 513 16 13 16 131416 Detector Phase 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 6.5 3.0 14.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.5 10.0 10.0 20.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 15.0 14.0 15.0 15.0 57.0 15.0 Total Split (%) 10.0% 9.3% 10.0% 10.0% !38.0% 10.0% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 10.5 11.5 10.5 51.0 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 57.4 65.9 67.5 74.5 89.5 10.5 51.0 10.5 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.44 0.45 0.50 0.60 0.07 0.34 0.07 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.50 0.11 0.26 0.13 0.79 0.48 0.55 0.63 Control Delay 9.9 7.3 22.1 22.4 13.7 91.0 40.7 38.0 5.1 Queue Delay 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 10.1 7.5 22.1 22.4 13.7 91.0 40.7 38.0 5.1 LOS B A C C B F D D A Approach Delay 9.2 20.7 53.1 9.9 Approach LOS A C D A Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 41 16 143 52 95 233 69 65 Queue Length 95th (ft) m88 m88 35 181 84 #156 291 m97 157 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 125 253 235 185 Base Capacity (vph) 1354 696 307 1843 944 240 1198 240 1241 Starvation Cap Reductn 182 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Spillback Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.53 0.10 0.27 0.13 0.79 0.48 0.55 0.64 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 19 307 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 0.5 31.0 9.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 42.0 28.0 50.0 14.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 28% 19% 33% 9% 33% Maximum Green (s) 36.0 24.5 44.0 10.5 44.0 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 70 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None Max None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Sgillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 20 308 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queuemay be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m' Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal Splits and Phases: 600: Rand Road & Central Road Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections AM Peak Hour #300#600 #300#600 ]#300 �r 109 #300#500 *t 0 7 -O 012 #500#600 #500#600 #500#600 ,500#600 X500#600 06(R) 0 1#500#600 Y'" 0 t 141t, VIdl-11 two 16 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 21 309 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street PM Peak Hour Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 310 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 10 5 5 40 25 1 Future Volume (vph) 10 5 5 40 25 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 14 13 12 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.90 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.958 0.995 Flt Protected 0.995 0.954 Satd. Flow (prot) 1903 0 0 1926 1827 0 Flt Permitted 0.995 0.954 Satd. Flow (perm) 1903 0 0 1926 1827 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1650 156 226 Travel Time (s) 45.4 4.3 6.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%p 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 11 5 5 42 26 1 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 0 47 27 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 13 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1:00 0.92 0.96 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 310 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Lane Configurations 1� - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 5 5 40 25 1 Future Vol, veh/h 10 5 5 40 25 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 5 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 5 5 42 26 1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 16 0 66 14 Stage 1 - - 14 Stage 2 - - - - 52 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1602' 939 1066 Stage 1 - - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - ; 970 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602 936 1066 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 936 - Stage 1 - - - 1009 Stage 2 - - - - 967 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 311 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street PM Peak Hour t 1 Lane Configurations Y tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 5 10 35 1275 1455 5 Future Volume (vph) 5 10 35 1275 1455 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 125 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 140 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.907 Flt Protected 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1775 0 1770 3725 3539 0 Flt Permitted 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) , 1775 0 1770 3725 3539 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 106 624 1977 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.6 33.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 11 37 1342 1532 5 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 37 1342 1537 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 14 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 312 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Lane Configurations Y - 0.2 - - ) tt -i 61.6 - HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 10 35 1275 1455 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 35 1275 1455 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 11 37 1342 ;1532 5 Conflicting Flow Al 2280 769 1537 0 - 0 Stage 1 1535 - Stage 2 745 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14; - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 34 344 429; - Stage 1 164 - - - - - Stage 2 430 - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 31 344 429 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 31 - - - - - Stage 1 150 - Stage 2 430 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 - 0.2 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.2 -i 61.6 - HCM Lane LOS B - F - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.7 - 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 313 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 0.0 tt r 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 r Traffic Volume (vph) 70 765 605 0 870 105 365 135 0 0 0 75 Future Volume (vph) 70 765 605 0 870 105 365 135 0 0 0 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 238 3912 120 0 9 12 120 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 200 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.977 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1671 0 ; 0' 0 1611, Flt Permitted 0.138 0.950 0.977 Satd. Flow (perm) , 257 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1671 0 ; 0' 0 1611, Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 624 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 74 805 637 0 916 111 384 142 0 0 0 79 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 32% Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 805 637 0 916 111 261 265 0 0 0 79 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 30 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 " 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, pm+pt NA custom NA Perm Split NA Over Protected Phases 3 2 3912 2 912 9 12 3 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 314 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour LanAonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(f) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type', Protected Phases 5 6 7 9 12 13 14 16 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 6 315 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Detector Phase 3 2 3912 2 2 912 9 12 3 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 6.5 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 12.7% 39.3% 39.3% 39.3% 12.7%« Maximum Green (s) 15.5 53.0 53.0 53.0 15.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 30 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max C -Max C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 70.8 53.0 150.0 53.0 53.0 68.7 68.7 15.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.46 0.46 0.1,0 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.61 0.40 0.70 0.20 0.35 0.35 0.48 Control Delay 33.0 42.4 0.8 17.0 14.6 15.6 15.4 74.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 4.8 4.7 0.0 Total Delay 33.0 42.4 0.8 17.4 14.6 20.4 20.2 74.0 LOS C D A B B C C E Approach Delay 24.5 17.1 20.3 74.0 Approach LOS C B C E Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 341 0 106 24 221 224 74 Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 413 0 122 m34 265 268 133 Internal Link Dist (ft) 544 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 238 120 120 Base Capacity(vph) 277 1316 1577 1316 559 744 765 166 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 111 0 406 422 0 Spillback Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.61 0.40 0.76 0.20 0.77 0.77 0.48 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 316 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 5.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 33.0 9.5 9.5 31.0 9.5 22.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 28.0 19.0 25.0 47.0 11.0 14.0 47.0 Total Split (%) 21% 19% 13% 17% 31% 7% 9% 31% Maximum Green (s) 26.5 22.0 14.5 21.5 41.0 7.5 10.5 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 70 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None None Max None None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Sgillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 317 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal Splits and Phases: 300: Mt Prosp( #300#600 02 #500#500 #500#600 06 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Road & Rand Road 03 1 IN 09 0 1:2 ,x`500#600 #500#60 5010#600 #500#600 05 7 �f 17-* X1)6 Synchro 11 Report Page 9 318 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations +M Traffic Volume (vph) 15 835 5 15 1090 15 1 1 15 1 1 10 Future Volume (vph) 15 835 5 15 1090 15 1 1 15 1 1 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.998 0.880 0.886 Flt Protected 0.999 0.999 0.997 0.996 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3532 0 0 3529 0 0 1634 0 0' 1644 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.999 0.997 0.996 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 0 3532 0 0 3529 0 0 1634 0 ; 0' 1644 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1867 199 606 635 Travel Time (s) 36.4 3.9 16.5 17.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 16 879 5 16 1147 16 1 1 16 1 1 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 900 0 0 1179 0 0 18 0 0 13 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free free Stop Stop Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 10 319 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations 0.066 4� - 0.021 - - 0.065 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.3 11.2; 0.3 9.8 0.3 - 24.8 HCM Lane LOS C B A Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 835 5 15 _1090 15 1 1 15 1! 1 10 Future Vol, veh/h 15 835 5 15 1090 15 1 1 15 1 1 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 879 5 16 1147 16 1 1 16 1i 1 11 Conflicting Flow Al 1163 0 0 884 0 0 1520 2109 442 1659 2103 582 Stage 1 - - - 914 914 - 1187 1187 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 606 1195 - 472 916 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54' 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1, Maneuver 596 - 761 - 81 51 563 64' 51 456 Stage - - - - - - 294 350 - 200 260 - Stage 2 - - - 451 258 - 542 349 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 596 -i 761 71 45 563 56 45 456 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 71 45 - 56 45 - Stage 1 - - - 278 331 - 189 244 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 412 243 - 497 331 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.066 0.026 - - 0.021 - - 0.065 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.3 11.2; 0.3 9.8 0.3 - 24.8 HCM Lane LOS C B A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.2 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 11 320 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 tt r Detector 1 Delay (s) tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 155 675 "20 135 865 0 25 345 , 130 0 375 230 Future Volume (vph) 155 675 20 135 865 0 25 345 130 0 375 230 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 185 Detector 2 Extend (s) 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 Turn Type, 0 1 pm+pt 1; 0 NA 1, Taper Length (ft) 25 Protected Phases 13 80 513 512 73 7 14 56 13 25 13 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 + 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.996 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 0 1770 3725 0 1770 3539 1583 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.195 0.158 0.370 Satd. Flow (perm) 363 3525 0 294 3725 0 689 3539 1583 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% "2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 163 711 21 142 911 0 26 363 137 0 395 242 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 732 0 142 911 0 26 363 137 0 395 242 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 " 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, custom NA pm+pt NA D.P+P NA custom NA pm+ov Protected Phases 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 56 13 6 14 13 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 12 321 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour LanAonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm); Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(f) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type', Protected Phases 2 3 5 6 9 12 14 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 13 322 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour 4- i Detector Phase 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 56 13 6 14 13 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 14.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 20.0 9.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 11.0 47.0 19.0 11.0 Total Split (%) 7.3% 31.3% 12.7% 7.3% Maximum Green (s) 7.5 41.0 14.5 7.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.5 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 78.7 41.0 75.7 69.0 47.3 23.8 98.5 30.0 46.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.27 0.50 0.46 0.32 0.16 0.66 0.20 0.31 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.76 0.30 0.53 0.08 0.65 0.13 0.56 0.50 Control Delay 22.5 56.0 21.3 11.3 15.0 52.8 10.1 34.1 25.0 Queue Delay 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.7 Total Delay 261 56.0 21.3 11.4 15.0 53.1 _ 10.1 34.8 25.6 LOS C E C B B D B C C Approach Delay 50.6 127 40.0 31.3 Approach LOS D B D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 32 347 61 255 8 154 47 99 94 Queue Length 95th (ft) 56 425 91 308 20 204 76 134 138 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 ! 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 185 145 Base Capacity(vph) 262 963 474 1713 322 566 1039 707 487 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 159 0 0 0 103 69 Spillback Gap Reductn 44 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.76 0.30 0.59 0.08 0.67 0.13 0.65 0.58 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 323 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Splits and Phases: 500: Mt Prosp( #300#600 02 #500#5i30 ,500#600 06 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Road & Central Road 03 1 IN 09 0 1:2 #500#600 #500#60 500#600j#'500#600 05 7 �f 171 ;6 Synchro 11 Report Page 15 324 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 14.0 6.5 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 10.0 10.0 33.0 9.5 31.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 59.0 19.0 31.0 28.0 25.0 47.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 39% 13% 21% 19% 17% 31% 9% Maximum Green (s) 53.0 15.5 26.5 22.0 21.5 41.0 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 70 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None None C -Max None Max None Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 35.0 39.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Sgillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 16 325 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 tt r 0.0 0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 545 260 30 665 165 335 810 45 145 620 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 545 260 30 665 165 335 810 45 145 620 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 Detector 2 Extend (s) 115 125 0.0 253 235 0.0 0 185 Turn Type, 0 Storage Lanes 0 custom 1 1 Prot 1 2! 1316 0 1! 3 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 36 115 300 145 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.992 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1770 3725 1583 3433 3511 0 3433 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.284 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 529 3725 1583 3433 3511 0 3433 3725 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 2% "2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 574 274 32 700 174 353 853 47 153 653 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 574 274 32 700 174 353 900 0 153 653 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1! 2 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 " 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, NA custom D.P+P NA custom Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 17 326 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm); Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(f) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type', Protected Phases 6 9 12 13 16 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 18 327 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 19 328 --p- t i Permitted Phases 513 16 13 16 131416 Detector Phase 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 6.5 3.0 14.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.5 10.0 10.0 20.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 31.0 14.0 19.0 31.0 59.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 20.7% 9.3% 12.7% 20.7% !39.3% 12.7% Maximum Green (s) 26.5 10.5 15.5 26.5 53.0 14.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 51.2 75.7 61.7 68.7 87.5 26.5 53.0 14.3 39.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.50 0.41 0.46 0.58 0.18 0.35 0.10 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.34 0.11 0.41 0.19 0.58 0.73 0.47 0.66 Control Delay 10.8 4.2 25.4 28.1 15.3 61.1 46.3 39.8 19.8 Queue Delay 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.0 4.3 254 28.1 15.3 61.1 46.3 39.8 19.8 LOS B A C C B E D D B Approach Delay 8.9 25.6 50.5 23.6 Approach LOS A C D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 50 31 17 237 77 165 402 80 178 Queue Length 95th (ft) 71 m59 38 291 118 220 483 122 250 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 125 253 235 185 Base Capacity(vph) 1207 798 304 1705 917 606 1240 331 993 Starvation Cap Reductn 152 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.36 0.11 0.43 0.19 0.58 0.73 0.46 0.66 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 19 328 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 0.5 31.0 9.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 28.0 25.0 47.0 11.0 47.0 Total Split (%) 19% 17% 31% 7% 31% Maximum Green (s) 22.0 21.5 41.0 7.5 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 70 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None Max None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Sgillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 20 329 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal its and Phases: 600: Rand Road & Central Road Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections PM Peak Hour 02 GR.) I t 03 1 IN 09 1 IN % 012 #5IIiCIiCI,�*I6I00 #500#6005�Ii0'a* 600 5i00#6i0 500#6i00 5100#600 T * • 06 (R. � 55 1 �f 1 1 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 21 330 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street Saturday Peak Hour Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 331 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 10 5 5 30 10 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 5 5 30 10 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 14 13 12 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.90 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.958 0.958 Flt Protected 0.993 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 1903 0 0 1973 1783 0 Flt Permitted 0.993 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 1903 0 0 1973 1783 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1650 156 226 Travel Time (s) 45.4 4.3 6.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 5 5 32 11 5 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 0 37 16 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 13 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.96 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 331 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street Saturday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Lane Configurations 1� - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 5 5 30 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 5 5 30 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 5 5 32 ; 11 5 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 16 0 56 14 Stage 1 - - 14 Stage 2 - - - - 42 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1602' 952 1066 Stage 1 - - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - ; 980 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602 949 1066 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 949 - Stage 1 - - - 1009 Stage 2 - - - - 977 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 332 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street Saturday Peak Hour t 1 Lane Configurations Y tt 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 5 10 "20 11,110 1255 15 Future Volume (vph) 5 10 20 1110 1255 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 125 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 140 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.907 0.998 Flt Protected 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1775 0 1770 3725 3532 0 Flt Permitted 0.985 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) , 1775 0 1770 3725 3532 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 106 624 1977 Travel Time (s) 4.3 10.6 33.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 11 21 1168 1321 16 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 0 21 1168 1337 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 14 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 333 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street Saturday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Lane Configurations Y - 0.123 - - ) tt 37 - HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 10 20 1110 1255 15 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 20 1110 1255 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None -i None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 11 21 1168 1321 16 Conflicting Flow Al 1955 669 1337 0 - 0 Stage 1 1329 - Stage 2 626 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14; - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 56 400 512' - Stage 1 212 - - - - - Stage 2 495 - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 54 400 512 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 54 - - - - - Stage 1 203 - Stage 2 495 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 - 0.123 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.3 37 - HCM Lane LOS B - E - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.4 - 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 334 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 0.0 tt r 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 r Traffic Volume (vph) 110 705 475 0 670 105 335 185 0 0 0 125 Future Volume (vph) 110 705 475 0 670 105 335 185 0 0 0 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 238 3912 120 0 9 12 120 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 200 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.985 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1685 0 ; 0' 0 1611, Flt Permitted 0.245 0.950 0.985 Satd. Flow (perm) , 456 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1685 0 ; 0' 0 1611, Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 624 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 116 742 500 0 705 111 353 195 0 0 0 132 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 24% Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 742 500 0 705 111 268 280 0 0 0 132 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 30 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 " 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, pm+pt NA custom NA Perm Split NA Over Protected Phases 3 2 3912 2 912 9 12 3 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 335 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour LanAonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(f) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type', Protected Phases 5 6 7 9 12 13 14 16 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 6 336 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Detector Phase 3 2 3912 2 2 912 9 12 3 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 6.5 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 12.7% 39.3% 39.3% 39.3% 12.7%« Maximum Green (s) 15.5 53.0 53.0 53.0 15.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 30 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max C -Max C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 71.0 53.0 150.0 53.0 53.0 68.5 68.5 15.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.46 0.46 0.1,0 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.56 0.32 0.54 0.20 0.36 0.36 0.80 Control Delay 30.0 41.2 0.5 19.7 18.4 16.3 16.3 97.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 4.2 4.5 0.0 Total Delay 30.0 41.2 0.5 19.9 18.4 20.4 20.8 97.0 LOS C D A B B C C F Approach Delay 25.3 19.7 20.6 97.0 Approach LOS C B C F Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 308 0 106 31 228 238 128 Queue Length 95th (ft) 99 375 0 126 50 262 271 #243 Internal Link Dist (ft) 544 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 238 120 120 Base Capacity(vph) 351 1316 1583 1316 559 742 769 166 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 131 0 388 407 0 Spillback Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.56 0.32 0.59 0.20 0.76 0.77 0.80 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 337 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 5.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 33.0 9.5 9.5 31.0 9.5 22.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 28.0 19.0 25.0 47.0 11.0 14.0 47.0 Total Split (%) 21% 19% 13% 17% 31% 7% 9% 31% Maximum Green (s) 26.5 22.0 14.5 21.5 41.0 7.5 10.5 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 70 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None None Max None None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Sgillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 338 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queuemay be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 300: Mt Prosp( #300#600 02 ,4500,4500 ,#500,4600 06 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Road & Rand Road 03 1 nA 09 0 1:2 ,x`500#600 #'500,460 '"`5010#600,*500#600 05 �1 7 �J 17-* X1)6 Synchro 11 Report Page 9 339 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations +M Traffic Volume (vph) 10 765 5 10 695 5 10 1 20 1 1 10 Future Volume (vph) 10 765 5 10 695 5 10 1 20 1 1 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.999 0.914 0.886 Flt Protected 0.999 0.999 0.984 0.996 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3532 0 0 3532 0 0 1645 0 0' 1644 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.999 0.984 0.996 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 0 3532 0 0 3532 0 0 1645 0 ; 0' 1644 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 1867 199 606 635 Travel Time (s) 36.4 3.9 16.5 17.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2%° 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 11 805 5 11 732 5 11 1 _ 21, 1i 1 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 821 0 0 748 0 0 33 0' 0 13 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 ; 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9; 15 "9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 10 340 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations 0.128 4� - 0.013 - - 0.035 HCM Control Delay (s) 21.3 9.2 0.1 9.5 0.1 - 15.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 765 5 10 695 5 10 1 20 1! 1 10 Future Vol, veh/h 10 765 5 10 695 5 10 1 20 1 1 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 805 5 11 732 5 11 1 21 1i 1 11 Conflicting Flow All 737 0 0 810 0 0 1219 1589 405 1182 1589 369 Stage 1 - - - 830 830 - 757 757 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 389 759 - 425 832 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - 7.54 6.54 7 7.54' 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.35 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1, Maneuver 865 - 812 - 136 107 587 145 107 628 Stage - - - - - - 331 383 - 366 414 - Stage 2 - - - 606 4+,13 - 578 382 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 865 - 812 128 102 587 134' 102 628 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 128 102 - 134 102 - Stage 1 - - - 323 374 - 358 404 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 581 404 - 543 373 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.128 0.012 - - 0.013 - - 0.035 HCM Control Delay (s) 21.3 9.2 0.1 9.5 0.1 - 15.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - 0 - 0.1 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 11 341 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 tt r Detector 1 Delay (s) tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 150 605 30 105 560 0 30 370 125 0 355 120 Future Volume (vph) 150 605 30 105 560 0 30 370 125 0 355 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 185 Detector 2 Extend (s) 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 Turn Type, 0 1 pm+pt 1; 0 NA 1, Taper Length (ft) 25 Protected Phases 13 80 513 512 73 7 14 56 13 25 13 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 + 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.993 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3514 0 1770 3725 0 1770 3539 1583 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.349 0.199 0.392 Satd. Flow (perm) 650 3514 0 371 3725 0 730 3539 1583 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% "2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 158 637 32 111 589 0 32 389 132 0 374 126 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 158 669 0 111 589 0 32 389 132 0 374 126 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 " 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, custom NA pm+pt NA D.P+P NA custom NA pm+ov Protected Phases 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 56 13 6 14 13 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 12 342 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour LanAonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm); Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(f) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type', Protected Phases 2 3 5 6 9 12 14 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 13 343 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour 4- i Detector Phase 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 56 13 6 14 13 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 14.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 20.0 9.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 11.0 47.0 19.0 11.0 Total Split (%) 7.3% 31.3% 12.7% 7.3% Maximum Green (s) 7.5 41.0 14.5 7.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.5 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 78.5 41.0 75.5 69.0 47.5 24.0 98.5 30.0 46.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.27 0.50 0.46 0.32 0.16 0.66 0.20 0.31 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.70 0.22 0.34 0.10 0.69 0.13 0.53 0.26 Control Delay 10.9 53.5 15.4 10.3 15.2 54.6 10.0 32.8 21.1 Queue Delay 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.2 Total Delay 11.2 53.5 154 10.4 15.2 55.1 10.0 33.4 21.....3 LOS B D B B B E B C C Approach Delay 45.4 11.2 42.1 30.3 Approach LOS D B D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 311 52 162 10 166 46 93 45 Queue Length 95th (ft) 48 383 85 200 23 218 74 123 73 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 ! 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 185 145 Base Capacity (vph) 3961 960 494 1713 331 566 1039 707 485 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 288 0 0 0 105 84 Spillback Gap Reductn 44 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.70 0.22 0.41 0.10 0.72 0.13 0.62 0.31 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 344 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Splits and Phases: 500: Mt Prosp( #300#600 02 #500#5i30 ,500#600 06 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Road & Central Road 03 1 IN 09 0 1:2 #500#600 #500#60 5i00#6i33 5i3i3#61313 05 7 �f 171 ;6 Synchro 11 Report Page 15 345 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 14.0 6.5 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 10.0 10.0 33.0 9.5 31.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 59.0 19.0 31.0 28.0 25.0 47.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 39% 13% 21% 19% 17% 31% 9% Maximum Green (s) 53.0 15.5 26.5 22.0 21.5 41.0 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 70 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None None C -Max None Max None Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 35.0 39.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Sgillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 16 346 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --p- i Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 tt r 0.0 0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 505 225 30 465 185 200 590 40 135 570 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 505 225 30 465 185 200 590 40 135 570 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 Detector 2 Extend (s) 115 125 0.0 253 235 0.0 0 185 Turn Type, 0 Storage Lanes 0 custom 1 1 Prot 1 2! 1316 0 1! 3 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 36 115 300 145 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.990 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1770 3725 1583 3433 3504 0 3433 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.312 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 581 3725 1583 3433 3504 0 3433 3725 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 2% "2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 532 237 32 489 195 211 621 42 142 600 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 532 237 32 489 195 211 663 0 142 600 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1! 2 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 " 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type, NA custom D.P+P NA custom Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 17 347 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm); Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(f) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type', Protected Phases 6 9 12 13 16 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 18 348 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 19 349 --p- t i Permitted Phases 513 16 13 16 131416 Detector Phase 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 6.5 3.0 14.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.5 10.0 10.0 20.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 31.0 14.0 19.0 31.0 59.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 20.7% 9.3% 12.7% 20.7% !39.3% 12.7% Maximum Green (s) 26.5 10.5 15.5 26.5 53.0 14.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 51.0 75.5 61.5 68.5 87.5 26.5 53.0 14.5 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.50 0.41 0.46 0.58 0.18 0.35 0.10 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.30 0.10 0.29 0.21 0.35 0.54 0.43 0.60 Control Delay 10.6 3.8 25.1 26.1 15.6 56.1 40.6 39.9 16.2 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.8 3.8 25.1 26.1 15.6 56.1 40.6 39.9 16.2 LOS B A C C B E D D B Approach Delay 8.6 23.2 44.4 20.7 Approach LOS A C D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 28 17 155 87 94 272 75 150 Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 39 38 197 132 135 335 114 219 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 125 253 235 185 Base Capacity (vph) 1203 796 321 1701 923 606 1238 331 993 Starvation Cap Reductn 153 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.32 0.10 0.29 0.21 0.35 0.54 0.43 0.60 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 19 349 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road its and Phases: 600: Rand Road & Central Road 02 Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections Saturday Peak Hour 03 1 76N 09 0 1:2 #500#600 #500#600 #550 }0#600 #500#60 5i00#6i00 500#600 T * • 06 tR. S5 1 �f 1 X16 09/21/2022 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 20 350 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) No -Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 0.5 31.0 9.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 28.0 25.0 47.0 11.0 47.0 Total Split (%) 19% 17% 31% 7% 31% Maximum Green (s) 22.0 21.5 41.0 7.5 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 70 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None Max None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Sgillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 09/21/2022 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 21 351 FUTURE (2028) BUILD CAPACITY REPORTS Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour Jami nl 0 k3 1 i 108( E37 352 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol`, veh/h 10 5 20 10 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 5 20 10 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None , Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 5 21 11 11 5 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 16 0 67 14 Stage 1 - - - - 14 - Stage 2 - - - - 53 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602- 938 1066 Stage 1 _, __ 1009 Stage 2 - - - - 970 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602 - 926 1066 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 926 - Stage 1 - - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - - - 957 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.013 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 2 353 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Lane Configurations Y ) tt 0 Traffic Vol`, veh/h 5 10 30 925 1140 0 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 30 925 1140 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow i 5 11 32 974 1200 0 Conflicting Flow All 1751 600 1200 0 - 0 Stage 1 1200 - - - - - Stage 2 551 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 77 444 577 - - - Stage 1 248 - - Stage 2 541 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 73 444 577 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 73 - - - - - Stage 1 234 - - - - - Stage 2 541 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 - 0.096 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 4 354 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations tt r tt r 4 r Traffic Volume (vph) 20 880 270 0 625 35 320 35 0 0 0 10 Future Volume (vph) 20 880 270 0 625 35 320 35 0 0 0 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 238 120 0 120 0 0: 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 0 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.961 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1641 0 0' 0 1611' Flt Permitted 0.263 0.950 0.961 Satd. Flow (perm) 490 3725 1583 0 3725 11583 1625 1641 0 0' 0 1611 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 252 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 4.3 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 10% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 21 926 284 0 658 37 337 37 0 0 0 11, Shared Lane Traffic (%) 45% Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 926 284 0 658 37 185 189 0 0 0 11, Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 30 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9' 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1, Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Turn Type pm+pt NA custom NA Perm Split NA Over 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 355 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour LanAonfig u rations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft)` Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1, Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1, Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1, Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Turn Type 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 6 356 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour -11 --,, t Permitted Phases 2 2312 Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 15.0 Total Split (%) 10.0% 38.0% 38.0% 38.0% 10.0% Maximum Green (s) 11.5 51.0 51.0 51.0 11,5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 010 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max C -Max C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 65.0 51.0 150.0 51.0 51.0 74.5 74.5 11.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.34 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.50 0.50 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.73 0.18 0.52 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.09 Control Delay 24.4 47.6 0.2 16.8 15.0 9.8 9.8 66.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.5 1.6 010 Total Delay 24.4 47.6 0.2 16.9 15.0 11.3 11.4 66.3 LOS C D A B B B B E Approach Delay 36.3 16.8 11.4 66.3 Approach LOS D B B E Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 418 0 80 8 134 137 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 499 0 95 m17 176 181 32 Internal Link Dist (ft) 172 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 238 120 120 Base Capacity (vph) 310 1266 1573 1266 538 804 812 123 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 76 0 456 460 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.73 0.18 0.55 0.07 0.53 0.54 0.09 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6: Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.3% ICU Level of Service A 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 7 357 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour Permitted Phases Switch Phase Minimum Split (s) 10.0 33.0 9.5 9.5 31.0 9.5 22.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 42.0 15.0 28.0 50.0 14.0 14.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 10% 28% 10% 19% 33% 9% 9% 33% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 35.0 10.5 24.5 44.0 10.5 10.5 44.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 OA 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s)' Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None None Max None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 358 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road AM Peak Hour m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. its and Phases: 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road 02 09 1 "1011 012 #500#600 #590#60001#500#600 ]#'500#60 ]#500#600j#'500#600 4-1+ 1 06 i[R) 4t 1*0 w - 141 "1 T' 1-4 two IS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 9 359 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Lane Configurations +M Traffic Vol`, veh/h 30 920 5 5 605 30 5 1 5 40 1 25 Future Vol, veh/h 30 920 5 5 605 30 5 1 5 40 1 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 968 5i 5 637 32 5 1 5 42 1 26 Conflicting Flow All 669 0 0 973 0 0 1364 1714 487 1212 1700 335 Stage - - - - - - 1035 1035 - 663 663 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 329 679 - 549 1037 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 ; 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 917 - - 704 - - 106 89 526 138 91 661 Stage 1 _, 248 307 - 417 457 Stage 2 - - - - - - 658 449 - 488 307 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 917 - - 704 - - 94 81 526 126 83 661 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 94 81 - 126 83 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 229 284 - 385 452 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 623 444 - 445 284 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.079 0.034 - - 0.007 - - 0.386 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 13 360 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 tt r 0.0 tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 125 0.0 830 10 95 560 0 20 230 125: 0 210 60 Future Volume (vph) 125 830 10 95 560 0 20 230 125 0 210 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 185 0.0 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 NA 0 1 ©.P+P 1 0 NA 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 16 513 80 7 7 14 73 6 14 13 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 , 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 0 1752 3725 0 1770 3471 1583 0 3471 1583 Flt Permitted 0.310 0.098 0.598 Satd. Flow (perm) 577 3532 0 181 3725 0 1114 3471 1583 0 3471 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) ; 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 0% 2% 4% 2% 0% 4% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 132 874 11 100 589 0 21 242 132 0 221 63 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 132 885 0 100 589 0 21 242 132 0 221 63 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1, Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type custom NA pm+pt NA ©.P+P NA custom NA pm+ou Protected Phases 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 5613 6 14 13 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 361 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour LanAonfig u rations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1, Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1, Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 2 3 5 6 9 12 14 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 15 362 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour 4- t Detector Phase 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 5613 6 14 13 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 14.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 20.0 9.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 14.0 50.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 9.3% 33.3% 10.0% 9.3% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 44.0 10.5 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.5 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 68.9 44.4 65.9 56.4 57.1 19.6 95.1 43.6 62.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.30 0.44 0.38 0.38 0.13 0.63 0.29 0.42 vlc Ratio 0.38 0.85 0.35 0.42 0.04 0.54 0.13 0.22 0.10 Control Delay 16.6 58.4 32.9 22.4 12.8 51.3 11.3 20.8 14.3 Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 16.7 58.4 32.9 22.7 12.8 51.3 11.3" 20.8 14.3 LOS B E C C B D B C B Approach Delay 53.0 24.2 35.9 19.3 Approach LOS D C D B Queue Length 50th (ft) 39 431 41 225 7 100 49 ! 43 22 Queue Length 95th (ft) 63 519 m66 286 18 140 78 61 41 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 185 145 Base Capacity (vph) 349 1046 289 1400 469 462 i 1003 1018 660 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 298 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio', 0.39 0.85 0.35 0.53 0.04 0.52 0.13 0.22 0.10 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 37.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 16 363 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 14.0 6.5 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 10.0 10.0 33.0 9.5 31.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 57.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 28.0 50.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 38% 10% 10% 28% 19% 33% 9% Maximum Green (s) 51.0 11.5 10.5 36.0 24.5 44.0 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None None C -Max None Max None Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 35.0 39.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio', 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 17 364 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour its and Phases: 500: Mt Prosoect Road & Central Road 02 #500 09 1 IN 012 #500#600 4 #590#60001#500#600 ]#500#600J#500#600J#500#600 JA- 4+ 1 06 i(R) 41 1*0 w 1 1-4 two IS 01/11/2023 Kirnley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 18 365 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 tt r 0.0 0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 625 330 30 475 120 180 540 15: 134 750 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 625 330 30 475 120 180 540 15 130 750 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 Detector 2 Extend (s) 115 125 0.0 253 235 0.0 0 185 Turn Type 0 Storage Lanes 0 custom 1 1 Prot 1 2 1316 0 1 3 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 36 115 300 145 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.996 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1752 3725 1583 3433 3525 0 3433 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.262 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 483 3725 1583 3433 3525 0 3433 3725 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) ; 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 658 347 32 500 126 189 568 16 137 789 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 658 347 32 500 126 189 584 0 137 789 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1' 2 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20' 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1, Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA custom D.P+P NA custom Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 21 366 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1, Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1, Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 6 9 12 13 16 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 22 367 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 23 368 --,, t t Permitted iPhases 51316 1316 131416 Detector Phase 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 6.5 3.0 14.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.5 10.0 10.0 20,0 9.5 Total Split (s) 15.0 14.0 15.0 15.0 57.0 15.0 Total Split (%) 10.0% 9.3% 10.0% 10.0% ' 38.0% 10.0% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 10.5 11.5 10.5 51.0 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 57.4 65.9 67.5 74.5 89.5 10.5 51.0 10.5 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.44 0.45 0.50 0.60 0.07 0.34 0.07 0.33 vlc Ratio 0.49 0.50 0.11 0.27 0.13 0.79 0.49 0.57 0.64 Control Delay 9.9 7.3 22.1 22.4 13.7 91.0 40.9 38.3 5.5 Queue Delay 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 10.1 7.5 22.1 22.4 13.7 91.0 40.9 38.3 5.6 LOS B A C C B F D D A Approach Delay 9.2 20.7 53.1 10.4 Approach LOS A C D B Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 41 16 146 52 95 237 72 73 Queue Length 95th (ft) m88 m88 35 185 84 #156 297 m100 164 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 125 253 235 185 Base Capacity (vph) 1354 696 307 1843 937 240 1198 240 1241 Starvation Cap Reductn 182 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0' 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio', 0.56 0.53 0.10 0.27 0.13 0.79 0.49 0.57 0.65 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 23 368 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road AM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 9.5 31.0 9.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 42.0 28.0 50.0 14.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 28% 19% 33% 9% 33% Maximum Green (s) 36.0 24.5 44.0 10.5 44.0 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None Max None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio', 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 24 369 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal Splits and Phases: 600: Rand Road & Central Road Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections AM Peak Hour #300#600 #300#600 #300#500 � ]#300 *tO9 *t 012 02 T O #500#600 #500#600 #500#600 #500#5100 #500#600 #500#500 ; 4-4+ , 06 R.) 0 1 1,two 16 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 25 370 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 701: Access A & Rand Road AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations ttl� tt r Traffic Vol`, veh/h 1130 20 0 955 0 30 Future Vol, veh/h 1130 20 0 955 0 30 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 2 5 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1189 21 0 1005 0 32 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 605 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 378 Stage 1 0 __ 0 Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - - - - 378 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 29 371 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 702: Albert Street & Access B AM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 4.5 Lane Configurations +' Traffic Vol`, veh/h 20 5 15 45 50 0 Future Vol, veh/h 20 5 15 45 50 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None , Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 5 16: 47 53 0 Conflicting Flow All 63 0 - 0 87 - Stage 1 - - - - 40 - Stage 2 - - - - 47 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 i - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1540 - - - 914 0 Stage 1 _, _ 982 0 Stage 2 - - - - 975 0 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1540 - - - 901 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 901 - Stage 1 - - - - 968 - Stage 2 - - - - 975 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - - 0.058 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 31 372 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol`, veh/h 10 5 25 40 25 1 Future Vol, veh/h 10 5 25 40 25 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None , Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 5 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 5 26i 42 26 1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 16 0 108 14 Stage 1 - - - - 14 - Stage 2 - - - - 94 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602- 889 1066 Stage 1 _, __ 1009 Stage 2 - - - - 930 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1602 - 874 1066 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 874 - Stage 1 - - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - - - 914 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 - - 0.016 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 2 373 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations Y ) tt 0 Traffic Vol`, veh/h 5 10 55 1280 1460 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 55 1280 1460 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow i 5 11 58 1347 1537 5 Conflicting Flow All 2330 771 1542 0 - 0 Stage 1 1540 - - - - - Stage 2 790 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 31 343 427 - - - Stage 1 163 - - Stage 2 408 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 27 343 427 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 27 - - - - - Stage 1 141 - - - - - Stage 2 408 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.136 - 0.226 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 4 374 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 0.0 tt r 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 r Traffic Volume (vph) 70 775 610 0 880 105 380 135 0 0 0 75 Future Volume (vph) 70 775 610 0 880 105 380 135 0 0 0 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 238 3912 120 0 9 12 120 0 0: 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 0 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.976 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1670 0 0' 0 1611' Flt Permitted 0.134 0.950 0.976 Satd. Flow (perm) 250 3725 1583 0 3725 11583 1625 1670 0 0' 0 1611 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 252 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 4.3 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 74 816 642 0 926 111 400 142 0 0 0 79 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 33% Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 816 642 0 926 111 268 274 0 0 0 79 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 30 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1, Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA custom NA Perm Split NA Over Protected Phases 3 2 3912 2 912 9 12 3 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 375 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour LanAonfig u rations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft)` Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1, Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1, Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 5 6 7 9 12 13 14 16 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 6 376 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour -11 --,, t Detector Phase 3 2 3912 2 2 912 9 12 3 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 6.5 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 12.7% 39.3% 39.3% 39.3% 12.7% Maximum Green (s) 15.5 53.0 53.0 53.0 15.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max C -Max C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 70.9 53.0 150.0 53.0 53.0 68.6 68.6 15.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.46 0.46 0.10 vlc Ratio 0.27 0.62 0.41 0.70 0.20 0.36 0.36 0.48 Control Delay 33.5 42.7 0.8 16.9 14.6 15.9 i 15.8 74.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 5.4 5.5 0.0 Total Delay 33.5 42.7 0.8 17.4 14.6 21.3 21.3 74.0 LOS C D A B B C C E Approach Delay 24.7 17.1 21.3 74.0 Approach LOS C B C E Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 347 0 107 24 225 230 74 Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 418 0 123 m33 342 280 133 Internal Link Dist (ft) 172 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 238 120 120 Base Capacity (vph) 275 1316 1577 1316 559 743 764 166 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 110 0 406 421 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio', 0.27 0.62 0.41 0.77 0.20 0.80 0.80 0.48 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 377 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 5.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 33.0 9.5 9.5 31.0 9.5 22.5 20,0 Total Split (s) 31.0 28.0 19.0 25.0 47.0 11.0 14.0 47.0 Total Split (%) 21% 19% 13% 17% 31% 7% 9% 31% Maximum Green (s) 26.5 22.0 14.5 21.5 41.0 7.5 10.5 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None None Max None None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio', 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 378 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road PM Peak Hour Splits and Phases: 300: Mt Prospe #300#600 #-, t 0212) #500#600 '500#600 06 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Road & Rand Road #600 03 1 IN 09 5 0 0 #1 600 05 44, 1*0 7 0 12 #500#600 =r. 1, 0 I - 40 Synchro 11 Report Page 9 379 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Lane Configurations +M Traffic Vol`, veh/h 25 830 5 15 1085 35 1 1 15 25 1 20 Future Vol, veh/h 25 830 5 15 1085 35 1 1 15 25 1 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 874 5i 16 1142 37 1 1 16 26 1 21 Conflicting Flow All 1179 0 0 879 0 0 1533 2140 440 1683 2124 590 Stage - - - - - - 929 929 - 1193 1193 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 604 1211 - 490 931 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54' 6.54 ; 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 588 - - 764 - - 80 48 565 61 49 451 Stage 1 _, 288 344 - 198 258 Stage 2 - - - - - - 452 253 - 529 344 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 588 - - 764 - - 67 41 565 52 42 451 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 67 41 - 52 42 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 263 314 - 181 242 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 403 238 - 468 314 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.069 0.045 - - 0.021 - - 0.576 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 13 380 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 tt r Detector 1, Delay (s) tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 175 675 20 135 870 0 35 340 130 0 380 230 Future Volume (vph) 175 675 20 135 870 0 35 340 130 0 380 230 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 185 Detector 2 Extend (s) 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 Turn Type 0 1 pm+pt 1 0 NA 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 Protected Phases 13 80 513 512 73 7 14 5613 25 13 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 , 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.996 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 0 1770 3725 0 1770 3539 1583 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.193 0.158 0.364` Satd. Flow (perm) 360 3525 0 294 3725 0 678 3539 1583 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) ; 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 184 711 21 142 916 0 37 358 137 0 400 242 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 184 732 0 142 916 0 37 358 137 0 400 242 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1, Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type custom NA pm+pt NA ©.P+P NA custom NA pm+ou Protected Phases 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 5613 6 14 13 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 381 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour LanAonfig u rations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1, Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1, Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 2 3 5 6 9 12 14 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 15 382 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour 4- t Detector Phase 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 5613 6 14 13 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 14.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 20.0 9.5 95 Total Split (s) 11.0 47.0 19.0 11.0 Total Split (%) 7.3% 31.3% 12.7% 7.3% Maximum Green (s) 7.5 41.0 14.5 7.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.5 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 78.6 41.0 75.6 69.0 47.4 23.9 98.5 30.0 46.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.27 0.50 0.46 0.32 0.16 0.66 0.20 0.31 vlc Ratio 0.71 0.76 0.30 0.53 0.12 0.64 0.13 0.57 0.50 Control Delay 28.8 56.0 21.3 11.3 15.6 52.4 10.1 34.4 25.0 Queue Delay 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.7 Total Delay 35.5 56.0 21.3 11.4 15.6 52.5 10.1 35.1 25.6 LOS D E C B B D B D C Approach Delay 51.9 12.8 39.0 31.6 Approach LOS D B D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 347 61 257 12 152 47 100 94 Queue Length 95th (ft) #74 425 91 311 25 201 76 137 138 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 185 145 Base Capacity (vph) 260 963 474 1713 320 566 1039 707 486 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 157 0 0 0 103 69 Spillback Cap Reductn 42 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio', 0.84 0.76 0.30 0.59 0.12 0.64 0.13 0.66 0.58 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 16 383 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 14.0 6.5 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 10.0 10.0 33.0 9.5 31.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 59.0 19.0 31.0 28.0 25.0 47.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 39% 13% 21% 19% 17% 31% 9% Maximum Green (s) 53.0 15.5 26.5 22.0 21.5 41.0 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None None C -Max None Max None Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 35.0 39.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio', 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 17 384 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 500: Mt Prospe 3oi3#600 I0212) #500#600 5i0i3 6100 06 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Road & Central Road 03 1 09 05 7 0 12 #500#6i3i3 x'1;5 Synchro 11 Report Page 18 385 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 tt r 0.0 0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 545 260 30 670 165 335 820 45: 150 625 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 545 260 30 670 165 335 820 45 150 625 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 Detector 2 Extend (s) 115 125 0.0 253 235 0.0 0 185 Turn Type 0 Storage Lanes 0 custom 1 1 Prot 1 2 1316 0 1 3 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 36 115 300 145 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.992 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1770 3725 1583 3433 3511 0 3433 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.284 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 529 3725 1583 3433 3511 0 3433 3725 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) ; 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 574 274 32 705 174 353 863 47 158 658 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 574 274 32 705 174 353 910 0 158 658 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1' 2 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20' 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1, Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA custom D.P+P NA custom Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 21 386 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1, Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1, Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 6 9 12 13 16 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 22 387 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 23 388 --,, t t Permitted iPhases 51316 1316 131416 Detector Phase 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 6.5 3.0 14.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.5 10.0 10.0 20,0 9.5 Total Split (s) 31.0 14.0 19.0 31.0 59.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 20.7% 9.3% 12.7% 20.7% ' 39.3% 12.7% Maximum Green (s) 26.5 10.5 15.5 26.5 53.0 14.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 51.1 75.6 61.6 68.6 87.5 26.5 53.0 14.4 39.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.50 0.41 0.46 0.58 0.18 0.35 0.10 0.27 vlc Ratio 0.48 0.34 0.11 0.41 0.19 0.58 0.73 0.48 0.67 Control Delay 10.8 4.2 25.4 28.2 15.3 61.1 46.6 39.8 20.4 Queue Delay 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.1 4.3 25.4 28.2 15.3 61.1 46.6 39.8 20.4 LOS B A C C B E D D C Approach Delay 8.9 25.7 50.6 24.2 Approach LOS A C D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 50 31 17 240 77 165 408 84 183 Queue Length 95th (ft) 71 m59 38 293 118 220 490 125 254 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 125 253 235 185 Base Capacity (vph) 1206 798 304 1704 917 606 1240 331 993 Starvation Cap Reductn 152 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 0' 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio', 0.54 0.36 0.11 0.44 0.19 0.58 0.73 0.48 0.66 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 23 388 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road PM Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 9.5 31.0 9.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 28.0 25.0 47.0 11.0 47.0 Total Split (%) 19% 17% 31% 7% 31% Maximum Green (s) 22.0 21.5 41.0 7.5 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None Max None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio', 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 24 389 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road its and Phases: 600: Rand Road & Central Road 02 #500#600 1 #500 #600 06 01/11/2023 Kirnley-Horn #600 03 1 IN 09 05 1 #5i09#1600 44, 1*0 7 Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections PM Peak Hour 012 #500#600 1, -100 Ir. Synchro 11 Report Page 25 390 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 701: Access A & Rand Road PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations ttl� tt r Traffic Vol`, veh/h 1455 15 0 1335 0 25 Future Vol, veh/h 1455 15 0 1335 0 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1532 16 0 1405 0 26 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 774 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 293 Stage 1 0 __ 0 Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - - - - 293 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.09 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 29 391 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 702: Albert Street & Access B PM Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Lane Configurations +' Traffic Vol`, veh/h 20 10 30 30 35 0 Future Vol, veh/h 20 10 30 30 35 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None , Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 11 32 32 37 0 Conflicting Flow All 64 0 - 0 101 - Stage 1 - - - - 48 - Stage 2 - - - - 53 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 i - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1538 - - - 898 0 Stage 1 _, _ 974 0 Stage 2 - - - - 970 0 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1538 - - - 885 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 885 - Stage 1 - - - - 960 - Stage 2 - - - - 970 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - - 0.042 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 31 392 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 100: Albert Street & Henry Street Saturday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol`, veh/h 10 10 35 30 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 10 35 30 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None , Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 11 37 32 11 5 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 22 0 123 17 Stage 1 - - - - 17 - Stage 2 - - - - 106 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1593- 872 1062 Stage 1 _, _ 1006 Stage 2 - - - - 918 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1593 - 851 1062 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 851 - Stage 1 - - - - 1006 - Stage 2 - - - - 896 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - 0.023 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 2 393 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 200: Rand Road & Henry Street Saturday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Lane Configurations Y ) tt 0 Traffic Vol`, veh/h 5 10 50 1120 1265 15 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 50 1120 1265 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 125 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow i 5 11 53 1179 1332 16 Conflicting Flow All 2036 674 1348 0 - 0 Stage 1 1340 - - - - - Stage 2 696 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 49 397 507' - - - Stage 1 209 - - Stage 2 456 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 44 397 507 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 44 - - - - - Stage 1 187 - - - - - Stage 2 456 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.104 - 0.146 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 4 394 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 0.0 tt r 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 r Traffic Volume (vph) 110 725 480 0 685 105 360 185 0 0 0 125 Future Volume (vph) 110 725 480 0 685 105 360 185 0 0 0 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 238 3912 120 0 9 12 120 0 0: 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 0 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3725 1583 0 3725 1583 1625 1683 0 0' 0 1611' Flt Permitted 0.236 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow (perm) 440 3725 1583 0 3725 11583 1625 1683 0 0' 0 1611 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 252 488 285 426 Travel Time (s) 4.3 8.3 6.5 9.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 116 763 505 0 721 111 379 195 0 0 0 132 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 25% Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 763 505 0 721 111 284 290 0 0 0 132 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 18 30 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1, Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA custom NA Perm Split NA Over Protected Phases 3 2 3912 2 912 9 12 3 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 395 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour LanAonfig u rations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Storage Length (ft)` Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Flt Protected Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1, Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1, Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 5 6 7 9 12 13 14 16 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 6 396 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --,, t Detector Phase 3 2 3912 2 2 912 9 12 3 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 6.5 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 12.7% 39.3% 39.3% 39.3% 12.7% Maximum Green (s) 15.5 53.0 53.0 53.0 15.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max C -Max C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 71.0 53.0 150.0 53.0 53.0 68.5 68.5 15.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.46 0.46 0.10 vlc Ratio 0.34 0.58 0.32 0.55 0.20 0.38 0.38 0.80 Control Delay 30.6 41.6 0.5 19.6 18.1 17.2 16.9 97.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 4.4 4.3 0.0 Total Delay 30.6 41.6 0.5 19.8 18.1 21.5 21.3 97.0 LOS C D A B B C C F Approach Delay 25.7 19.5 21.4 97.0 Approach LOS C B C F Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 318 0 107 31 240 245 128 Queue Length 95th (ft) 99 387 0 127 49 360 280 #243 Internal Link Dist (ft) 172 408 205 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 238 120 120 Base Capacity (vph) 345 1316 1583 1316 559 742 768 166 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 129 0 375 394 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio', 0.34 0.58 0.32 0.61 0.20 0.77 0.78 0.80 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 7 397 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 5.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 33.0 9.5 9.5 31.0 9.5 22.5 20,0 Total Split (s) 31.0 28.0 19.0 25.0 47.0 11.0 14.0 47.0 Total Split (%) 21% 19% 13% 17% 31% 7% 9% 31% Maximum Green (s) 26.5 22.0 14.5 21.5 41.0 7.5 10.5 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None None Max None None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio', 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 8 398 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 300: Mt Prospect Road & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 300: Mt Prospe 3oi3#600 I0212) #500#600 5i0i3 6100 06 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Road & Rand Road 03 1 09 500 #16 0 0 05 7 0 12 #500#6i3i3 x'1;5 Synchro 11 Report Page 9 399 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 400: Albert Street & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Lane Configurations +M Traffic Vol`, veh/h 25 755 5 10 685 35 10 1 20 40 1 25 Future Vol, veh/h 25 755 5 10 685 35 10 1 20 40 1 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mumt Flow 26 795 5i 11 721 37 11 1 21 42 1 26 Conflicting Flow All 758 0 0 800 0 0 1233 1630 400 1212 1614 379 Stage - - - - - - 850 850 - 762 762 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 383 780 - 450 852 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 ; 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 849 - - 819 - - 133 101 600 138 103 619 Stage 1 _, 322 375 - 363 412 Stage 2 - - - - - - 611 404 - 558 374 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 849 - - 819 - - 119 93 600 124' 95 619 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 119 93 - 124 95 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 304 354 - 343 403 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 570 395 - 507 353 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.135 0.031 - - 0.013 - - 0.393 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 13 400 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 tt r Detector 1, Delay (s) tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 180 605 30 105 570 0 40 365 125: 0 360 120 Future Volume (vph) 180 605 30 105 570 0 40 365 125 0 360 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 130 0 185 Detector 2 Extend (s) 145 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 Turn Type 0 1 pm+pt 1 0 NA 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 Protected Phases 13 80 513 512 73 7 14 5613 25 13 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 , 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.993 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3514 0 1770 3725 0 1770 3539 1583 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.343 0.199 0.387 Satd. Flow (perm) 639 3514 0 371 3725 0 721 3539 1583 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) ; 35 35 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 199 401 308 285 Travel Time (s) 3.9 7.8 7.0 6.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 189 637 32 111 600 0 42 384 132 0 379 126 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 189 669 0 911 600 0 42 384 132 0 379 126 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1, Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1, Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type custom NA pm+pt NA ©.P+P NA custom NA pm+ou Protected Phases 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 5613 6 14 13 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 14 401 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour LanAonfig u rations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1, Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1, Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 2 3 5 6 9 12 14 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 15 402 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour 4- t Detector Phase 13 16 513 512 7 7 14 5613 6 14 13 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 14.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 20.0 9.5 95 Total Split (s) 11.0 47.0 19.0 11.0 Total Split (%) 7.3% 31.3% 12.7% 7.3% Maximum Green (s) 7.5 41.0 14.5 7.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.5 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 78.5 41.0 75.5 69.0 47.5 24.0 98.5 30.0 46.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.27 0.50 0.46 0.32 0.16 0.66 0.20 0.31 vlc Ratio 0.48 0.70 0.22 0.35 0.13 0.68 0.13 0.54 0.26 Control Delay 12.7 53.5 15.6 10.4 15.7 54.2 10.0 33.1 21.1 Queue Delay 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.2 Total Delay 13.2 53.5 15.6 10.5 15.7 54.8 10.0 33.7 21.3 LOS B D B B B D B C C Approach Delay 44.6 11.3 41.3 30.6 Approach LOS D B D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 38 311 53 166 14 164 46 94 45 Queue Length 95th (ft) 56 383 86 204 28 216 74 125 73 Internal Link Dist (ft) 119 321 228 205 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 185 145 Base Capacity (vph) 390 960 494 1713 329 566 1039 707 485 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 282 0 0 0 105 84 Spillback Cap Reductn 44 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio', 0.55 0.70 0.22 0.42 0.13 0.72 0.13 0.63 0.31' Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120' Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 16 403 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Splits and Phases: 500: Mt Prospe #300#600 #-, t 0212) #500#600 '500#600 06 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Road & Central Road 1#300#600 03 1 IN 09 5 0 0 #1 600 05 44, 1*0 7 0 12 #500#600 =r. 1, 0 I - 40 Synchro 11 Report Page 17 404 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 500: Mt Prospect Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 14.0 6.5 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 10.0 10.0 33.0 9.5 31.0 22.5 Total Split (s) 59.0 19.0 31.0 28.0 25.0 47.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 39% 13% 21% 19% 17% 31% 9% Maximum Green (s) 53.0 15.5 26.5 22.0 21.5 41.0 10.5 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None None C -Max None Max None Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 35.0 39.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio', 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 18 405 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour -11 --1' t Lane Configurations 0.0 tt r 0.0 tt r 0.0 0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 tt 0.0 0.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 505 225 30 475 185 200 605 40 145 580 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 505 225 30 475 185 200 605 40 145 580 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) ; 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 Detector 2 Extend (s) 115 125 0.0 253 235 0.0 0 185 Turn Type 0 Storage Lanes 0 custom 1 1 Prot 1 2 1316 0 1 3 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 36 115 300 145 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.991 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1770 3725 1583 3433 3507 0 3433 3725 0 Flt Permitted 0.312 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 581 3725 1583 3433 3507 0 3433 3725 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) ; 35 35 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 401 1343 1439 488 Travel Time (s) 7.8 26.2 24.5 8.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 532 237 32 500 195 211 637 42 153 611 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 532 237 32 500 195 211 679 0 153 611 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 16 16 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1' 2 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20' 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1, Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1, Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1, Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA custom D.P+P NA custom Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 21 406 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1, Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1, Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1, Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 6 9 12 13 16 01/11/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 22 407 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 23 408 --,, t t Permitted iPhases 51316 1316 131416 Detector Phase 1316 5 1413 14 16 3 5 2 7 36 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 5.0 6.5 3.0 14.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.5 10.0 10.0 20,0 9.5 Total Split (s) 31.0 14.0 19.0 31.0 59.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 20.7% 9.3% 12.7% 20.7% ' 39.3% 12.7% Maximum Green (s) 26.5 10.5 15.5 26.5 53.0 14.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C -Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 51.0 75.5 61.5 68.5 87.5 26.5 53.0 14.5 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.50 0.41 0.46 0.58 0.18 0.35 0.10 0.27 vlc Ratio 0.44 0.30 0.10 0.29 0.21 0.35 0.55 0.46 0.62 Control Delay 10.6 3.8 25.1 26.2 15.6 56.1 40.9 40.3 17.2 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.8 3.8 25.1 26.2 15.6 56.1 40.9 40.3 17.2 LOS B A C C B E D D B Approach Delay 8.6 23.3 44.5 21.8 Approach LOS A C D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 28 17 159 87 94 280 80 157 Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 39 38 202 132 135 344 122 227 Internal Link Dist (ft) 321 1263 1359 408 Turn Bay Length (ft) 115 125 253 235 185 Base Capacity (vph) 1203 796 321 1701 923 606 1239 331 993 Starvation Cap Reductn 153 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio', 0.51 0.32 0.10 0.29 0.21 0.35 0.55 0.46 0.62 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 23 408 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 600: Rand Road & Central Road its and Phases: 600: Rand Road & Central Road 02 #500#600 1 #500 #600 06 01/11/2023 Kirnley-Horn #600 03 1 IN 09 05 1 #5i09#1600 44, 1*0 7 Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections Saturday Peak Hour 012 #500#600 1, -100 Ir. Synchro 11 Report Page 24 409 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 600: Rand Road & Central Road Saturday Peak Hour Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 15.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 9.5 31.0 9.5 20.0 Total Split (s) 28.0 25.0 47.0 11.0 47.0 Total Split (%) 19% 17% 31% 7% 31% Maximum Green (s) 22.0 21.5 41.0 7.5 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 40 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C -Max None Max None Max Flash Dont Walk (s) 35.0 39.0 11.0 33.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio', 01111/2023 Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 25 410 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 701: Access A & Rand Road Saturday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Lane Configurations ttl� tt r Traffic Vol`, veh/h 1250 25 0 1170 0 40 Future Vol, veh/h 1250 25 0 1170 0 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1316 26 0 1232 0 42 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 671 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 342 Stage 1 0 __ 0 Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - - - - 342 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.123 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 29 411 HCM 6th TWSC Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 702: Albert Street & Access B Saturday Peak Hour Int Delay, s/veh 4.9 Lane Configurations +' Traffic Vol`, veh/h 35 10 15 45 55 0 Future Vol, veh/h 35 10 15 45 55 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None , Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 37 11 16i 47 58 0 Conflicting Flow All 63 0 - 0 125 - Stage 1 - - - - 40 - Stage 2 - - - - 85 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 i - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1540 - - - 870 0 Stage 1 _, _ 982 0 Stage 2 - - - - 938 0 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1540 - - - 849 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 849 - Stage 1 - - - - 958 - Stage 2 - - - - 938 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - - - 0.068 HCM Lane LOS 01/11/2023 Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 31 412 FUTURE (2028) BUILD CAPACITY REPORTS - ALTERNATE GEOMETRY FOR CENTRAL ROAD 1 ALBERT STREET Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour Jaminl/ "IE:,83; 8341 80 413 HCM 6th TWSC 400: Albert Street & Central Road 01/22/2023 Int Delay, s/veh Lane Configurations +M r Traffic Vol`, veh/h 30 920 5 5 605 30 5 1 5 40 1 25 Future Vol, veh/h 30 920 5 5 605 30 5 1 5 40 1 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 968 5i 5 637 32 5 1 5 42 1 26 Conflicting Flow All 669 0 0 973 0 0 1364 1714 487 1212 1700 335 Stage - - - - - - 1035 1035 - 663 663 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 329 679 - 549 1037 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 ; 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 917 - - 704 - - 106 89 526 138 91 661 Stage 1 _, 248 307 - 417 457 Stage 2 - - - - - - 658 449 - 488 307 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 917 - - 704 - - 94 81 526 126 83 661 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 94 81 - 126 83 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 229 284 - 385 452 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 623 444 - 445 284 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Lane LOS 0.079 0.034 - - 0.007 - - 0.348 0.04 Build AM Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 7:30 am 09/15/2022 AM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 414 HCM 6th TWSC 400: Albert Street & Central Road 01/22/2023 Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Lane Configurations +M r Traffic Vol`, veh/h 25 830 5 15 1085 35 1 1 15 25 1 20 Future Vol, veh/h 25 830 5 15 1085 35 1 1 15 25 1 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 874 5i 16 1142 37 1 1 16 26 1 21 Conflicting Flow All 1179 0 0 879 0 0 1533 2140 440 1683 2124 590 Stage/ - - - - - - 929 929 - 1193 1193 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 604 1211 - 490 931 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54' 6.54 ; 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 588 - - 764 - - 80 48 565 61 49 451 Stage 1 _, 288 344 - 198 258 Stage 2 - - - - - - 452 253 - 529 344 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 588 - - 764 - - 67 41 565 52 42 451 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 67 41 - 52 42 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 263 314 - 181 242 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 403 238 - 468 314 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Lane LOS 0.069 0.045 - - 0.021 - - 0.526 0.047 Build PM Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 4:45 pm 09/14/2022 PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 415 HCM 6th TWSC 400: Albert Street & Central Road 01/22/2023 Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Lane Configurations +M r Traffic Vol`, veh/h 25 755 5 10 685 35 10 1 20 40 1 25 Future Vol, veh/h 25 755 5 10 685 35 10 1 20 40 1 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mumt Flow 26 795 5i 11 721 37 11 1 21 42 1 26 Conflicting Flow All 758 0 0 800 0 0 1233 1630 400 1212 1614 379 Stage - - - - - - 850 850 - 762 762 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 383 780 - 450 852 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 ; 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 849 - - 819 - - 133 101 600 138 103 619 Stage 1 _, 322 375 - 363 412 Stage 2 - - - - - - 611 404 - 558 374 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 849 - - 819 - - 119 93 600 124' 95 619 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 119 93 - 124 95 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 304 354 - 343 403 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 570 395 - 507 353 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Lane LOS 0.135 0.031 - - 0.013 - - 0.351 0.043 Build Saturday Future (2028) Build Traffic Projections 11:45 am 09/15/2022 Saturday Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 U11 Ki'm ley0 4201 Winfield Road I Suite 6001 Warrenville, IL 60555 630-487-5550 417 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE-THROUGH LANES) AND A VARIATION (PARKING LOT SETBACK) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 915 EAST RAND ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, LuAron Foster of Raising Cane's Restaurants LLC (Petitioner), has filed a petition for a Conditional Use to operate a drive-through restaurant and a Variation (parking lot setback) for property located at 915 East Rand Road (Property) and legally described as: LOT 1 IN CENTURY RESUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF LOTS 2, 3 AND ALL OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 2 IN FRANK SERAFINE'S THIRD ADDITION BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTH WEST* 1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID CENTURY -RESUBDIVISION REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ON DECEMBER 17, 1976, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2912036, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. EXCEPT THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN CENTURY-RESUBDVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN*, ACCORDING TO THE PLATTHEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1976 AS TORRENS DOCUMENT NO. 2912036 IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BEARINGS* AND DISTANCES BASED ON THE ILLINOIS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NAD 83 (2011 ADJUSTMENT) WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 0.99996302, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS*: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 (ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF RAND ROAD) BEING A 2172.46 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 176.60 FEET (THE CHORD BEARS SOUTH 54 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, 176.55 FEET): THENCE SOUTH 57 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, 60.3 FEET* ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD AS ACQUIRED BY THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PER CONDEMNATION CASE NO. 78 L 16042; THENCE SOUTH 38 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST, 25.28 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, 25.28 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 (ALSO BEING THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD AS PER TORRENS DOCUMENT NO. 3074014, RECORDED APRIL 23,1980): THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, 151.40 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, 32.04 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 (ALSO BEING THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD): THENCE NORTH 39 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 26.00 FEET TO A POINT 13.40 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST, 145.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE; THENCE NORTH 36 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST, 44.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE 6.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 57 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 41.63 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A POINT ON A 2178.46 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND BEING 6.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND PARALLEL LINE 177.09 FEET (THE CHORD BEARS NORTH 54 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 47 SECONDS WEST, 177.04 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST 6.00 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 418 PZ -01-23 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PROPERTY INDEX NUMBER: 03-35-307-009-0000; and WHEREAS, the "Petitioner" seeks (1) a Conditional Use to allow for dual drive-through lanes, including the construction of two freestanding canopies over the drive-through consisting of one drive-through canopy measuring ten feet in clearance height (10'-0") with a total area of one thousand three hundred forty-four square feet (1,344 SF) and one pick-up window canopy measuring twelve feet eight inches in clearance height (12'-8") with a total area of three hundred ninety-nine square feet (399 SF), one three-foot tall knee wall along the Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road frontage, and the installation of signage as illustrated in the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI; and (2) a Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten feet (10') to six and seven tenths feet (6.7') and to nine and three tenths feet (9.3') along the east property line (Rand Road frontage) as shown on the site plan, a copy of which is attached and made a part of as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the requests for a Conditional Use and a Variation being the subject of PZ -01-23 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of January, 2023, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Daily Herald on the 11th day of January, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ -01-23; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the requests meet the standards of the Village and would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use to allow for dual drive-through lanes, including the construction of two freestanding canopies over the drive-through consisting of one drive-through canopy measuring ten feet in clearance height (10'-0") with a total area of one thousand three hundred forty-four square feet (1,344 SF) and one pick-up window canopy measuring twelve feet eight inches in clearance height (12'-8") with a total area of three hundred ninety-nine square feet (399 SF), one three-foot tall knee wall along the Rand Road/Mount Prospect Road frontage, and the installation of signage as illustrated in the drawings dated 12.21.22 from ADA Architects and the signage brand book dated 12.19.22 prepared by AGI, subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation of the restaurant and drive-through shall be restricted to 10 AM to midnight daily; 2. The proposed temporary sign located on the south elevation may be changed without requiring a permit for the duration of the proposed temporary sign in that location on the building. No other temporary sign shall be allowed on the south elevation unless this 419 PZ -01-23 sign is removed; 3. The Petitioner shall address all comments included in the Village review letter dated January 19, 2023; 4. Additional evergreen plantings shall be added on the west side of the site along Albert Street between the parking lot and the residential area; 5. The Petitioner shall undertake the Albert Street improvements in substantial conformance with the preliminary civil engineering drawings dated 01/13/2023 and submitted to the Village on 02/17/2023. The Petitioner agrees to undertake the Albert Street improvements at the Petitioner's sole expense; however, Petitioner shall allow the Village to participate in sharing a portion of the costs of the Albert Street improvements should the Village choose to contribute. The participation of the Village is at the discretion of the Village and shall not exceed fifty percent of the mutually agreed upon project costs. The Albert Street improvements shall include the addition of a shared left- turn/through lane, a dedicated right -turn lane, and the relocation of all necessary right- of-way fixtures. Should the Albert Street improvements require plan review, approval, permitting and inspection of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), the Village shall use its best and reasonable efforts to support the Petitioner in gaining the required consent from IDOT. SECTION THREE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation to reduce the parking lot setback from ten feet (10') to six and seven tenths feet (6.7') and to nine and three tenths feet (9.3') along the east property line (Rand Road frontage) as shown on the site plan, attached as Exhibit "A", subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Kimley-Horn dated 01/13/2023; 2. The Petitioner shall address all comments included in the Village review letter dated January 19, 2023; 3. Submittal of landscape, irrigation, and photometric plans that comply with Village codes and regulations; 4. Wayfinding signage and site signage shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division to ensure safe and efficient movement; 5. Sidewalk across driveways must be poured separately from the aprons; 6. The existing water service shall be disconnected at the main and a new tap will have to be made for the new service by means of a pressure connection; 7. The trash enclosure will need to be covered; otherwise, the nearby drain is to be connected to the storm sewer system; 8. On-site easements that will no longer be necessary shall be vacated; 9. A permit from IDOT will be required for any work within the Rand Road and Central Road rights-of-way; 10. Compliance with all applicable Village Code requirements, including, but not limited to, fire code, lighting regulations, landscaping regulations, sign code regulations, and building regulations." SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance and Exhibit "A" with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: ►, K11 PZ -01-23 NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this Th day of February, 2023 Paul Wm. Hoefert Mayor ATTEST: Karen M. Agoranos Village Clerk 421 PZ -01-23 EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN 422