HomeMy WebLinkAbout6. NEW BUSINESS 05/06/2008
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
Mown Prospect
MEMORANDUM
~
TO:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
1!t> I t-A/~
s/,.. 0&
FROM:
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
APRIL 25, 2008
SUBJECT:
PZ-09-08 - CONDITIONAL USE FOR A VOCATIONAL SCHOOL
1920 S. CARBOY ROAD
TOM BARNARD, THE ATHLETIC BARN - APPLICANT
The petitioner, Mr. Tom Barnard, is seeking approval of a Conditional Use for a Vocational School for
the Athletic Barn, for the property located at 1920 S. Carboy Road.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday,
April 24, 2008, and by a vote of 5-0, with one member absent, recommended approval of a Conditional
Use for a Vocational School for the Athletic Barn. Details of the proceedings and items discussed
during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their May 6, 2008 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this
matter.
L.
HIPLAN\PI,Hllling & Lonmg COMM\P&Z 2008\MEJ Memo\PZ.09-08 The Athletic 8am Tcsl2_doc
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CASE NO. PZ-09-08
Hearing Date: April 24, 2008
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
1920 Carboy Road
PETITIONER:
Tom Barnard, The Athletic Barn, LLC
PUBLICA TION DATE:
April 9, 2008
PIN NUMBER:
50-08-23-401-039
REQUEST:
Conditional Use for a Vocational School (Sports Training Facility)
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Richard Rogers, Chair
Leo Floros
Marlys Haaland
Ronald Roberts
Keith Youngquist
MEMBER ABSENT:
Joseph Donnelly
ST AFF MEMBER PRESENT:
Brian Simmons, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
INTERESTED PARTIES:
Tom Barnard, Trevor Stocking, Robert Whisler
Chairman Richard Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The minutes for the January 24, 2008 meeting
were approved 4-0, with Keith Youngquist abstaining. The minutes for the March 27, 2008 meeting were
approved 4-0, with Ronald Roberts abstaining. Chairman Rogers introduced Case Number PZ-09-08, a request
for a Conditional Use for a Vocational School (Sports Training Facility) at 1920 Carboy Road, at 7:34 p.m.
Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development, restated the Petitioner's request and explained the
location of the subject property. He said that the proposed use would occupy the North half of the building. The
proposed property is surrounded by similar office/warehouse uses within the zoning district.
Mr. Simmons stated that the school would be designed to provide a sports training facility in the areas of baseball
and basketball. The proposed facility would house batting cages and basketball courts for hands on training. The
anticipated maximum occupancy would be 30 students and 2 employees.
Mr. Simmons said that Staffs primary concern was with the parking requirements. Mr. Simmons showed a table
referencing the Village's parking requirements. It was determined that there would be a surplus of 37 parking
spaces beyond what Village Code requires. Mr. Simmons stated that the proposed facility would have more of a
peak demand in the evening allowing for more parking available on site.
Mr. Simmons said the proposed Conditional Use request meets the standards as listed in the Zoning Ordinance.
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the following
motion:
"To approve:
1) A conditional use permit for a vocational school subject to the following conditions:
A. Development of the unit shall be in general conformance with the floor plan prepared by the Athletic
Barn; received by the Community Development Department on March 25, 2008.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting April 24, 2008
PZ-09-08
Page 2
B. The facility will need to meet all building and fire codes for a new assembly occupancy. Prior to the
issuance of a building permit, the petitioner shall submit an egress analysis for the proposed facility.
Any modifications to the fire alarm system as a result of this analysis shall be performed by the
petitioner prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
C. A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of
Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling
ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development
approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or
official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement
and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months.
Chairman Rogers swore in Tom Barnard, 1920 Carboy Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056. He asked the Petitioner
ifhe agreed to the conditions placed by Staff. Mr. Barnard stated he agreed. Mr. Barnard discussed the facility,
his background, and what his business would be able to provide.
There was general discussion regarding the facility.
Leo Floros asked what the demand is for this type of business. Mr. Barnard said there are some of these
businesses in Des Plaines and Lake Zurich. He felt there was a need in the Mount Prospect and Arlington Heights
area.
Mr. Floros asked ifthe Athletic Barn would be competitive with the park district. Mr. Barnard stated that there is
no competition and he would hope to be working directly with the local park districts. He stated that there is lack
of facilities during the winter and his business would provide the practice area that is needed.
Mr. Roberts said that this is a good off season option for kids in the park districts.
Chairman Rogers stated that he was pleased that this business would bring kids off the street and it is a positive
environment.
Chairman Rogers called for additional questions or comments; hearing none, the public hearing was closed at
7 :44 p.m.
Leo Floros made a motion to approve Case Number PZ-09-08, a request for a Conditional Use for a Vocational
School (Sports Training Facility), at 1920 Carboy Road. Ronald Roberts seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL:
AYES: Donnelly, Haaland, Roberts, Rogers, Floros
NAYS: NONE
Motion was approved 5-0.
Keith Youngquist made a motion to adjourn at 7:45 p.m., seconded by Chairman Richard Rogers. The motion was
approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
;{f#
Ryan Kast, Community Development
Administrative Assistant
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2008\Minules\PZ..Q9.08 1920 Carboy (Alhletic Barn)
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
CASE SUMMARY - PZ-09-08
LOCATION:
PETITIONER:
OWNER:
PARCEL #:
LOT SIZE:
ZONING:
LAND USE:
REQUEST:
1920 Carboy Road
Tom Barnard, The Athletic Barn, LLC
Robert Babin, Prospect Industrial Center.
50-08-23-401-039
8.3 acres
I-I Limited Industrial
Office-Warehouse Building
1) Conditional Use for a Vocational School (Sports Training Facility)
Subject Property
(1920 Carboy Rd)
LOCATION MAP
~
o
;n
o
0,
iD
c
J_......-."--D
.
u=:, ERANKLIN DR:cil, ",
Ir--'-'-'l'!
z L~
i~ ,)0
10 J';u
'rZ ,m
!C j:~
if hi
MEMORANDUM
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: BRIAN SIMMONS, AICP, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: APRIL 11,2008
HEARING DATE: APRIL 24, 2008
SUBJECT: PZ-09-08 - CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL FOR A VOCATIONAL SCHOOL
(SPORTS TRAINING FACILITY)
1920 CARBOY ROAD - TOM BARNARD (APPLICANT)
BACKGROUND
A public hearing has been scheduled for the April 24, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review
the application by Tom Barnard (the "Petitioner"), regarding the property located at 1920 S. Carboy Road (the
"Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking approval of a conditional use for a vocational school (sports
training facility). The P&Z Commission hearing was properly noticed in the April 9, 2008 edition of the Journal
Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250
feet and posted Public Hearing signs on the Subject Property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located in the industrial park to the south of Algonquin Road, just west of the intersection
of Nordic Road and Carboy Road. The site currently contains an office-warehouse building with related site
improvements. The Subject Property is zoned I-I Limited Industrial and is bordered to the North, West and South
by the I-I Limited Industrial District, and unincorporated Cook County to the East (industrial zoning).
SUMMARY
As proposed, the petitioner is seeking approval of a conditional use for a vocational school. The Athletic Barn
will occupy approximately 11,000 square feet of the existing 72,000 square foot industrial building. The
proposed facility will provide sports training services for children ages four and older. Services will include
baseball and basketball training facilities in addition to areas for participants to work out. Due to the age of
customers the facility will serve, the primary hours of operation for the vocational school will be from 3:30 PM to
9:30 PM on weekdays. The facility may be open for smaller groups as needed throughout the day, but primary
peak demand will occur in the evening hours. No modifications to the existing exterior site conditions are
proposed as part of this conditional use request.
Parking
Per code, office-warehouse buildings are required to provide one (1) parking space for every 1,500 square feet of
building square footage. The existing 72,000 square foot building therefore is required to provide a total of forty-
PZ-09-08
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 24, 2008
Page 3
eight (48) parking spaces if devoted entirely to office-warehouse uses. Vocational school parking requirements
differ from office-warehouse uses and are based on the number of individuals who will be utilizing the facility at
any specific time. Vocational schools are required to provide two (2) parking spaces for every three (3)
employees, plus one (1) space per the maximum number of students who would attend the facility. The proposed
facility will operate with two employees, with a maximum occupancy of thirty (30) students. The proposed
Athletic Barn vocational school will therefore require a total of thirty-two (32) parking spaces. With the addition
of the Athletic Barn, parking for the office-warehouse building will be calculated as follows:
Table 1: Parkin Schedule Re uirements
Parkin Re uirements S uired
Office-Warehouse Space
61,000 Sq. Ft.
1 space / 1,500 square feet
41
Athletic Barn
11,000 Sq. Ft.
32
73 s aces
110 s aces
37 spaces
The proposed site meets parking requirements. The addition of the proposed Athletic Barn will increase the
number of spaces required by code; however, adequate parking exists at the site to accommodate the proposed
use. During a site visit to the property, staff noted during the day that approximately half the spaces in the lot
were occupied indicating that a parking surplus exists. Additionally, the proposed use will experience a peak
parking demand period during evening and weekend hours when the office-warehouse portion of the building will
be experiencing limited demand.
CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include
seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary
of these findings:
· The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare;
· The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
· Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on
Village streets; and
· Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Village Ordinances.
The proposed use would not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety or general welfare. The use
would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood, or utility provision and it would be in
compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Finally, the proposed hours of
operation will have limited interaction with existing businesses within the facility and industrial park and will not
have an adverse impact on surrounding properties.
PZ-09-08
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 24, 2008
Page 4
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING
The property is located within an industrial park in the southern portion of the Village. The property is
surrounded by other office-warehouse buildings and an apartment complex. The Comprehensive Land Use Map
designates the subject property as Light Industrial and Office Research. This land use designation is appropriate
for profe&sional and business services, and research and development facilities. The proposed vocational school
is compatible with this land use designation.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Conditional Use request meets the standards as listed in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these
findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the following motion:
"To approve:
1) A conditional use permit for a vocational school subject to the following conditions:
A. Development of the unit shall be in general conformance with the floor plan prepared by the Athletic
Barn; received by the Community Development Department on March 25, 2008.
B. The facility will need to meet all building and fire codes for a new assembly occupancy. Prior to the
issuance of a building permit, the petitioner shall submit an egress analysis for the proposed facility.
Any modifications to the fire alarm system as a result of this analysis shall be performed by the
petitioner prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
C. A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of
Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling
ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development
approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or
official, shall become null and void ifno building permit is issued within the one (1) yearrequirement
and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months.
The Village Board's decision is final for this case, 1920 Carboy Road, Case No. PZ-09-08.
I concur:
t~
~<
ctor of Community Development
Iii H:\PLAN\PlilIUling & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2008\StaffReporl\PZ.09.08 The Athletic Barn.doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Application for Conditional Use Approval
Mount Prospect
~
z
o
-
E-o
-<:-
~-2'
~o
o <U
~~
z....
-0
>:---
Wil
Q
Z
-
Case Number
P&Z - 01 - 08
Development Name/Address
Date of Submission
Hearing Date
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
1920 S. Carboy Road
Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site)
8.3 I-I 182,000 Sq. Ft.
Setbacks:
Front Rear Side North Side South
Z 65 40 65 100
0
-
E-o Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
-<:
~ 24 feet 51 300
" Adjacent Land Uses:
0
~ North South East Industrial West
Z
- Vacant Vacant Multi-Family Industrial
Wil
E-o Tax J.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
-
rIJ
" 50-08-23-401-040 50-08-23-401-039
z
-
E-o
rIJ
-
>:
Wil Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary)
-_...
z
o
~
-<:
:;
"I
0..
'"" l:
Z ~
- .-
co..
Z 0..
::"1<
01
"
C-'
:::::
u
<
CQ
Name
Tom Barnard
Corporation
The Athletic Barn, LLC
Street Address
430 S. Dunton
Telephone (day)
847-894-6530
Telephone (evening)
Same
Fax
City State
Arlington Heights IL
Zip Code
60005
Email
Interest in Property
z
9
f-
<
~I
ex: ~
~ ~
zo
;;€
z Il)
:J 0-
o e
ex: 0..
~I
;:c
U
<
a:l
Name
Robert Babin
Corporation
Prospect Indust. Ctr., c/o Babin & Assoc.
Street Address
401 N. Franklin 5-S
City
Chicago
State
IL
Developer
Name
Address
Attorney
Name
Address
Surveyor
Z Name
0 I
-
E-< ell Address
-<:ca
~ t::
_ 0
ex: . Vi
O~
~ 0
Z ...
_0..
Qc Engineer
Z CI)
~ 8 Name
08-
ex:'Q) Address
c.:l >
:::Co
UI
-<:
CO
Architect
Name
I
Address
II
Landscape Architect
Name
Address
Zip Code
60610
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois
Telephone (day)
312-644-7239
Telephone (evening)
Fax:
312-644-7539
Email
Telephone (day)
Fax
Email
Telephone (day)
Fax
Email
Telephone (day)
Fax
Email
Telephone (day)
Fax
Email
Telephone (day):
Fax
Email
Telephone (day):
Fax
Email
Phone 847.818.5328
Fax 847.818.5329
Proposed Conditional Use (as listed in the zoning district)
Trade or Vocational School
Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary)
See attached letter from General Manager Trevor Stocking
Q
~
~&;
o~
;:l
... '0'
,,~
<"
~cn
~z
:;;)0
cn-
f-o
U
<
HOllrs of Operation
M-F lOAM - lOPM
S - S 8AM - lOPM
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
~z ~t1 "W S. C A-n. ~ otf /2.:JAf>
to Site Area (Acres) t1.J Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) ,-J Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use
"->E= 8. ~7AGt ;1"-1 I e1.Jc::lOO ~~ J ~ 190
Q<
~:;: Setbacks:
0" Front Rear Side ( ~ol>rl+') SideLI'I~~ }f,j
0..0 (pt;"' ~'7 I
Or. \ 00' (;,5'
ccz
Cl.,- Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
~ ';' 5'1 % "3~S-
Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other
materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly
suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy
and completeness at the time of submittal.
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be
given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the
own~r of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during
re(\.Sonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and
accurate to the best ofmJknowledge,
Applicant ~ {\,O {f: ~ ~L- Date L /L.L./ O~
Prim Name f{o B"'i..\'l. r (SA- ~ YS I ~
If applicant is not property owner:~ ~..~( t>~f-tl D)
"'c?M 'Df.\.~N~rLt:> fltL H liTl f..14 Dt\.f2.N
T hereby designate the applicant~o act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this
application and the associa d s ~~o.rti~ material.
Property Owner ~ f::> G L- Date 1..( 'Z- Z. /0 B
Mount Prospect Departme t of Community Development
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois
WWW.mountprospect.org
3
Phone 847.818.5328
Fax 847.818.5329
TDD 847.392.6064
I
Affidavit of Ownership
I
COUNTY OF COOK
)
)
)
t3A-\';\S,,J
, under oath, state that I am
STATE OF ILLINOIS
I, Rb~~n_:li
the sole
---Van
an authorized officer of the
)
-7) owner of the property
)
commonly described as {C? 0 C> r 0 "La ~ 0 ~. C ~ I2Bo"lf '('la 1\ () - A N()
t] P'EL IFf LA L L.. Lf I ~ z.. 0 ~ . C f;t..n, ~ 0 l./ f2 c> "fa tl... fv l1...C(o c; ~(
C)p r 1+ \ S La J..J ') I liON IT- L U ~ ~
and that such property is owned by
V? vf.jf)~rL In-v~l # 39 <1e-r 1- Al { f ~ T
as of this date.
(lJ~i~ LL-
Subscribed and sworn to before
me this
day of
,20_,
Notary Public
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois
www.mountprospect.org 4
Phone 847.818.5328
Fax 847.818.5329
TDD 847.392.6064
THE ATHLETIC BARN
1920 S. Carboy Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
847-894-6530
February 27,2008
Mr. William J. Cooney, Jr.
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056-3218
RE: Business License Application! Application for Conditional Use Approval
Dear Mr. Cooney:
I have been in the process of opening a new business in the Village of Mount
Prospect called "The Athletic Barn" for several months. During this time I
applied for a business license in the Village and was denied. I have enclosed my
application and denial letter for your review.
At the time I signed a lease at 1920 S. Carboy Road, I was informed by the
building's ownership that the II - Industrial Zoning was fine for my intended use.
Because ofthis, I was surprised to receive a letter denying my application.
I have reviewed the permitted uses in this zoning classification and understand
that my type of business is not listed. This use category is rather new and may not
have been added in to the Village's current code book. I am now applying for a
Conditional Use approval and have enclosed an application for your review.
In the past several years, facilities like ours have opened in surrounding
communities like Des Plaines, Wheeling, Libertyville, Glenview, Lake Zurich,
Schaumburg and Mount Prospect. Most of these are in buildings like 1920 S.
Carboy Road and provide instruction for gymnastics, baseball and other athletic
skills.
After reviewing the permitted uses in the II district, it appears our use would be a
"lighter use" than many now allowed per code. At the present time,
manufacturing, production, dry cleaning, baking, laboratories and exterminating
services are all allowed in the district. These are much "heavier uses" than a trade
or vocational school.
In Chapter 14 of the Village Code, it has a "purpose" for the II Industrial District.
Part of the definition states, "to provide an area for such uses that require a
pleasant, hazard and nuisance free environment". I believe our use meets this
purpose.
Mr. William 1. Cooney, Jr.
February 27,2008
Page Two
I wrote this letter in hopes that you will approve our application for a Conditional
Use and Business License in the Village of Mount Prospect. I understand our use
is not listed in the current permitted uses and we will have to apply for a
conditional use as a trade or vocational school.
The code does state that "other uses similar to the above uses as determined
appropriate by the Community Development Department and not listed in any
other zoning classification" may be approved. I am hoping you can see how our
use would fit into this zoning classification.
I appreciate you taking the time to review my request. I am available at
847-894-6530 any time to answer questions you might have or to meet and
discuss the approval process. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
.-.......J C
lc~ 8~1 ~ _ '
Tom Barnard
The Athletic Barn
Founder/Owner
010
KE"
.. ep.rrl"1 Nq- (.p(:rG.-
(. ~,,-rA&.E.)
~~\~
c.w\!.T
C=,~l- W~T ~
_ ~P<\...\.A\\..(.~S
C. 9c..\2.T A-f-U;.)
'--Ii r Ai J..-/-c.../-t.<.. 73 ,1IrIlJV
Atvi'Y 9 i) (i' S naA./~
-;;:.w 2#/'-, ;h"l t)
f.!,;...{ 7- 8 <1 V - t S.--3 0
CJ)
:I:
>
:;0
rTJ
o
r
o
.>
o
Z
(;)
o
o
o
^
~
to
[\)
o
n
>-
:::0
tJj
o
--<
I=:}
RECENED
!,,\r\>"\Q
tUO '1 t::, (iUQ
wi 1-'\ \ t... J -"
TiM~~ ~c ,..]
\II\lage of Mt. PrOSpect t
community 08\1e\Opmen
80'-0"
%
:E
>
:;0
1Tl.
:I:
o
C
CJ)
ITl
~
(,.I
ex>
I"
o
.
H'
Mr. William J. Cooney Jr.
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056-3218
February 13, 2008
Mr. William J. Cooney Jr.,
I would like to give you a better idea of what The Athletic Barn stands for and how we will go about our business as
a trade / vocational school. Below is our mission statement as well as a description of how we intend to teach.
The Athletic Barn Mission Statement
The Athletic Barn is a school whose goal is to empower students, in challenging situations, through sport. The
Athletic Barn's core values stem from the belief that a united process of teaching, coaching and learning will
empower students to obtain understanding, abilities and an outlook that supports a positive code of conduct.
Whether it is an uncoordinated youth who finds the importance of friendship by meeting a best friend while
participating in a baseball program; a high school junior who learns to work hard athletically and academically so
that he can earn a scholarship and be the first in his family to go to college; a lost youth who uses sport as a safe
haven from all that is bad in this world; or a wheelchair bound adult that had never been given hope until she found
out she can play basketball just like everyone else. Sport at The Athletic Barn teaches not only skills and trades but
to believe in something which is good at heart.
A parent's quote says it all, "If you want your child to develop the love for sport, he or she must see the game,
especially at a young age, as an activity that comes with a smile." Yes, we will teach skills and abilities in a variety
of sports. Yes we will teach baseball, softball, basketball, soccer, volleyball and other sports. But more importantly,
we will also teach skills that will transcend any victory or defeat.
The Athletic Barn's hope to train and prepare, those willing, for their future is dependent upon keeping our core
values in a united process that supports a positive code of conduct. If we are allowed to do so, there is no limit to
what The Athletic Barn can give back to a community in which its slogan rings, "Where friendliness is a way of life."
How we will teach
In order to make a career out of sport one must first learn to deal with failure. In a game of baseball, failure is a way
of life. It is a game in which a hitter who fails seven times out of ten can be enshrined into the games hall of fame.
More importantly, it is a game in which success depends on who can fail faster than his/her opponent.
At the Athletic Barn we preach "Fail Fast and go Forward!" Which in baseball terms means, if you miss a pitch on a
bad swing, take a step out of the box and recognize what was wrong with the swing. Then, figure out how to make
the fix before you step back in the box. You must be able to make your own adjustment.
This is where The Athletic Barn comes in. We are in the business of teaching, those willing, to become their own
best coach. We will do so in three phases which will promote an advance curriculum that offers this exact skill from
the age of four all the way up through the professional ranks.
Phase One will start by offering a program for four to thirteen year olds (Elementary to Middle School) that promotes
basic fundamentals and a strong work ethic in baseball. Every player must learn a solid fundamentals foundation in
order to understand how to coach oneself. This will be done while providing a safe, positive and interactive
experience to promote a passion for the sport.
Phase Two will offer a program for fourteen to eighteen year olds (High School) that builds off of the solid
fundamentals and work ethic learned in Phase One. Phase Two will prepare the student for college baseball or
career in professional baseball through advanced instruction developed by Owner! Founder Tom Barnard. Tom has
made a career out of developing students and turning them into professional baseball players. While the head coach
at Kishwaukee College, Tom placed over 70 players into NCAA schools, had 58 players drafted and even had 5
players reach the Major Leagues. Tom also has 25 years of experience with the Pittsburg Pirates handling player
development. Tom was a hitting and pitching Minor League instructor, a Midwest Crosschecker, Midwest
Supervision and Latin America Coordinator. This gives Tom a unique ability to provide advanced teaching while
showing the ways of becoming a professional player.
The Athletic Barn will also provide a college placement and consulting service through the direction of Tom Barnard
and Kent Stocking, retired Lake Zurich High School Counselor, which will better prepare each student for Phase
Three.
The Third Phase is to continue developing college baseball players and to get them into Major League Baseball.
With players who have made it to the professional level, the Athletic Barn's goal is to give them the best opportunity
to stay in the game as long as possible. This will be done again through of college and professional consulting
service as well as providing our advanced instruction during their off seasons.
I hope that I have given you an idea of just what The Athletic Barn stands for as well as how we will create a school
in which we develop athletes and prepare them for the professional ranks.
Thank you for your time.
Trevor Stocking
The Athletic Barn
President! General Manager
MAYOR
Irvana K. Wilks
VILLAGE MANAGER
Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES
Timothy 1. Corcoran
Paul Wm. Hoefert
Arlene A. Juracek
A. John Korn
Richard M. Lohrstorfer
Michael A. Zadel
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
VILLAGE CLERK
M. Lisa Angell
Phone: 847/818-5328
Fax: 847/818-5329
TDD: 847/392-6064
www.mollnlprospecl.org
February 7,2008
Mr. Tom Barnard
The Athletic Barn
430 South Dunton Avenue
Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005
Re: THE ATHLETIC BARN BUSINESS LICENSE
Dear Mr. Barnard:
Your application for a Mount Prospect Business License for an athletic facility at 1920 Carboy, Mount Prospect, Illinois
has been denied.
The application was reviewed by our Planning Division. The property at 1920 Carboy has an assigned zoning
classification ofll-Limited Industrial. Unfortunately, an athletic facility is not a permitted use in the II District. For
your convenience, I have attached the Village Code sections listing the purpose and both the permitted and conditional
uses of the Limited Industrial District.
At this point, you do have the option of applying for a Text Amendment to the Village Code to allow an athletic facility
as a Conditional Use in the Limited Industrial zoning district; however, Staff would generally not support this
amendment as your proposed use does not conform to the intent of the Limited Industrial zoning district.
If you would like to review the various zoning classifications and their permitted uses, you can view the Village Code
on-line at www.mountprospect.org. Select Village Code from the quick links and the zoning classifications, with their
permitted uses, are spelled out in Chapter 14.
The Community Development Department does maintain a list of available sites on our webpage at
http://www.mountprospect.orglbusiness/avail_sites.html if you would like to explore other locations for your business.
Should you have further questions regarding the zoning of the property or the Text Amendment process, please feel free
to contact Community Development at 847-818-5328.
Sincerely,
JtW/~
Stacey D::J3
Building Permit Clerk Supervisor
c. Paul Valentine, Fire Marshal
Cory Pikora, Fire Prevention Inspector
File
p~G\
l\ \,f\OS VILLAGE
N 50 SOUTH ERSON STREET
\J~OUNT PR PECT, IL 60056
t t. ~ .. 1 ?! (847) 92-6000
BUSINES~{dW:N E APPLICATION
NG O\\]~
rly.an~\J\~O\
phcal1Q
Business Legal Na At i- / IE r; <- ;g A A...,J
Doing Business As (Common Name) .5kfll i:
Business Address (PO Box Not Acceptable) Ie:; Z D e /h€../lbY
City/State/Zip Code,A/!T P'*'[)SPCC./ -7L 'Ocl~-"
Billing Address (If Different Than Above)
City/State/Zip Code
Business Phone /f., Pwc.r.ss
..,..-1 .- Li tl'l \ k(;L . t"
..J- ~\..) tv I t',- A
.~q FOR VILLAGE USE:
~ New Business
_ Existing - New Location
_ Existing - New Owner
_ Existing - No License
High Hazard _Yes _No
Bldg Permit _Yes _No
Building Permit #
Rtd to Dept App i
~ Plan 0
Bldg 0
(aptlste)_ [F1vH bd n
~ Fire 0 0
Police 0 0
~
Needs Inspect Dept
0 t:nvH
0 Fire
Business Fax
Business Email ~Il(..y.~.eh
Type of Business (check one): 0 Food Service 0 Service 0 RetaillWholesale/Warehouse o Manufacturing/Industrial OVending
o State Licensed Professional 0 Health Club/Massage/Reducing/Tanning 0 Kiosk 0 Promotional Event 0 Auctioneer
. I .
$' Other ,4.,-/.. (..~ nc:.. FA-C.IL 1'71
State Sales Tax (IBT) Number (Must attach copy of State Issued IBT document.)
r.o
Gross Floor Area of Establishment II ,.000 (Square Feet) Number of Parking Spaces I>
Is more than 10% of the gross floor area listed above devoted to the sale and/or storage of food and/or beverages? 0 Yes [!}No
If this is a new business, what is the expected date of occupancy? t=""eB"Z 0
If this is a transient/itinerant business, what are the expected dates of occupancy?
If known, please indicate prior occupant/type of business in this location: u ,.J lc~ot.>>,.J C.~Ul~ tY\b\J..i~r ()I\.A 1/ \.J"ovL
OWNERSHIP TYPE AND CONTACT INFORMA nON (Physical Address must be used, a Post Office Box is not acceDtable)
0" If Sole Proprietorship, list information for the sole owner/operator.
o If Partnership, list information for all Managing Partners. (Use another sheet of paper if needed.)
o If Corporation, list information for the President and Chief Financial Officer:
First Name: 10M. ~. . 1? M.l.
Residence Address 4~o ~, D t.l (}-,0,..J
Residence Phone 6'-1- 7 2 7. 7 -:-q;.. ~R
Last Name: 6;"tLN 1\ tt..h
City/State/Zip Code
Email
Date llfBirtn: .:;- /17 /~-B
~\.J"~ f-- li t-s J:"L ~6DD~
M.l.
First Name:
Residence Address
Residence Phone
Last Name:
City/State/Zip Code
Emai!
Property Owner (Physical Address must be used, a Post Office Box is not acceDtable)
FirstName:~~1 T"J"PC7"TIW'\L. e~ftve.. Last Name: 6.473/ ~
Residence Address 101#.1 ht.trtJl::f,';J ~u I~ ~~ City/State/Zip Code
Residence Phone B'-7-~1-77e7 title... /Nttlc:.$ t.- Email
Date of Birth:
Date of Birth:
{}A/c.,,"? D IL
ba6/0
List your LOCAUEmergency contacts, who have access to the building ~d are available for inspections (List in oraer of contact):
Order Name Phone Number Alternate/Mobile Phone,
1.
2.
3.
,'",
,,~'....
0 ''Yes ,[g-No
"
D Yes G-tto
D Yes G-No
0 Yes B-No
D Yes ~No
I. Are tobacco products sold over the counter at your establishment?
2. Does your business buy, trade or exchange gold and/or silver from (with)
the general public?
3. Do you use tow trucks in the operation of your business?
If YES, how many? Tow Trucks
4. Does your business sell/serve prepared food and/or beverages to the
general public? *If YES, be sure to obtain the foodlbeverage packet.
5. Does your business use vehicles to sell food and/or beverages directly
to the general public?
If YES, how many? Food Service Vehicles
6. How many vehicles are registered to the business?
.--
7. Will any hazardous materials be stored on premises?
If YES, please describe materials
DYes
B-No
8. Will any coin-in-slot devices or vending machines (electronic game, juke box, candMod, soda, laun~, etc.) be located
on your premises? *If YES, Please complete the vending machine addendum. ~ Yes U No
rvr-v p-E
9. How many employees will be at this location? '2-,
10. If applicable, how many seats does your restaurant have? (restaurants only)
Burglar Alarm: DYes ~No
Name of Alarm Company
Address of Alarm Company
Telephone Number of Alarm Company
*Note; iflicense has not been issued or picked up within six (6) months of the application date, this application will be considered void and
a new application will have to b(' submitted.
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION AND ADDENDUMS (IF
APPLICABLE) HAS BEEN FURNISHED BY ME AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE IS CORRECT. I UNDERSTAND
THAT ANY UNTRUE, INCONSISTENT OR MISLEADING INFORMATION SHALL BE CAUSE FOR THE REFUSAL TO GRANT
OR THE REVOCATION OF ANY LICENSE GRANTED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICA TION. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT BY
APPLYING IN WRITING FOR A LICENSE TO OPERATE IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT I HAVE READ AND
UNDERSTAND MY OBLIGATIONS UNDER APPROPRIATE VILLAGE ORDINANCES RESPECTIVE TO THE LICENSE (S) FOR
WHICH I AM APPLYING. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT IF ANY OF THE FOREGORING INFORMATION CHANGES DURING
THE COURSE OF THE LICENSE YEAR I WILL NOTIFY THE VILLAGE, IN WRITING, WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF SUCH
CHANGE. ~ n
Dalo 41/08 loL '6. -y J ?"-"-~,.<~T
Signllturerttle
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Fee
License No.
Date Paid
Date Issued
H:\PLAN\Business License - related info\Applications\Final BL Application 041106.doc
Apr 15 08 01 :30p
Bob Babbin
Prospect Industrial CenteL-
,
T.~esda.y_,~priI15. 2008
r-~ .-~ .
~nv
Planning anClZoning Dept.
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson St.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
(tt.....t:11 t
.-.-----~'^~,.;~\:.l
[~PR 1_ 5~
Village of Mt. Prospect
Community Development
1. Prt4't. fA'f.-
Dear Brian,
Re: The Athletic Barn - 1920 S. Carboy Rd.
The tenants in the 1900 S Carboy Rd. building are as follows:
1910
1920
1940
1960
1970
1980
Vacant
Athletic Barn (sports training school)
Sina International (warehouse hair products) 8:00am-5:00pm
Cardone Record Services (microfilming docs) 6:00am-Midnite
Green Bull Ladder (warehouse ladders) 7;00am-4:30pm
Accutrak (commercial sound systems) 9:00am-7:00pm
The site for this building accommodates 144 automobiles. (see attached site plan)
312-644-7259
p.1
Robert Babbin
401 North Franklin St.
Chicago, Illinois 60610
3126447239
Fax 312 644 7259
j1,.GS~ ,S~(,~
6,518 sf
12,190 sf
18,150 sf
19,230 sf
9 ,070 sf
6,450 sf
The proposed use offers a unique and desirable opportunity for the young people of the community that
was not foreseen when the zoning ordinance was drafted. The following item indicates a desire by the
drafters to provide for a similar use in this district:
14.2103: CONDITIONAL USES:
Archery and firearm shooting ranges for sports, safety
and marksmanship training.
There is no other zoning district in Mt. Prospect where you would be likely to find a suitable space with
20' high and 40' wide bays. Stores in the business zones only run about 12' high and 30' wide bays.
We, the owners of the Prospect Industrial Center respectfully request your approval of the special use
application and business license.
VXif~~lL
Robert Babbin, partner
Prospect Industrial Center is located at 1900-2000 South Carboy Road in Mount Prospect
~~
RECE1VEU -
~R~~J
Villageptf ~e~e\6pment
CommunI Y
l--\C~7
il TI T IT n n n n n TI TIT n n n n n n T I
cl~
..--Ico
<J::1iO.
....- -
(0
-----J---1
I
Z
0:::
<{ lL..
en OU1
o. (\10.
I- mOl
w ~ ...-_
....J ""
:r: ..-
I-
<(
I
I
_________J
...J.I
lL.. . I
U101--
2
,a~- J
I{')m<e'
..-..,......,2 I
ro -
..- (I) '\
---------1
I
I
tf)
lL..j~
U1IO
00 u
CD I"") ,I ~
O)N
..-- cr> I w
.-- 'I Z
. 0
Cl
10::
,<(
U
o
0:::: I
_________J
~olL..
<( en
a::: CO 0 .
I-~LO
~ ,~
o~ -
o (0
<(
\\\\\\ .
/
fJ / / /I / / / / ([I / / II I ~.1
\
-,,"y
~~(.~ :,'.: t\ t)
". 00
1/'- -=--'~'P-Z -01- ."6 tJa/iI
1" /. (I fJ fpfl c {;J
, ! \ .'1 f
H I
" ,
If
d
~ J
"
II
'I
l!
II
I!
!
II
l\
H
Ii
d
11
II
II
.1
'i
II
I.
Ii!
I.
n
'II
!
il
!l
H
1'1
I
II
II
II
Fl.-AT OF su~ve~
):''1:.
6El/R6E D. HARKER 4 A950CIATES · REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS
PARK RID6E, ILLINOIS bOO6B-IQoq PHONE: (113) 163 60b6
1800 lttJOOLAND A'v'Er.ftJE
p~OSFeCT INDUSTRIAL. ceNTER
MOUNT PROSPECT. ILLINOIS
2000 S, CARBOY ROAD
_~ll De5cr!pt.~___
/~.
[ koo "Ithil Lot 2 " 220;se.J2. sq. n. 0<;,5.0541 aGro'.
"
----.
P~l Real Estate Tax In<.:Iex No. _08-23-401-040
Lot. :2 h OENNES' RfSL6DMSION of oil of Lots II, i2 ald 16 and pat of Lot IB In ElmhJr5t Algorqvln ll'ldvstrlal P'TK, t.n!t No.2,
belf'l.j a 51JbdMslon in the SrAlth~t 1/4 of Sedlon 23, TONnsh!p 41 North, Rang6 !I cast of the Brd PrincIpal Meridian, 1.\ Cook
CO'Jnty. !I11n()5.
J
..:
mla
04/29/08
Bs
05/01/08
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1920 SOUTH CARBOY ROAD
WHEREAS, Tom Barnard, ("Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respectto
property located at 1920 Carboy Road, ("Property") and legally described as follows:
Lot 2 in DENNES' RESUBDIVISION of all of Lots 11, 12 and 16 and part of
Lot 13 in Elmhurst Algonquin Industrial Park, Unit No.2, being a subdivision
in the Southeast % of Section 23, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the
3rd Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
Property Index Number: 08-23-401-039; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to operate a sports training facility; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use being the subject of
PZ-09-08 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th
day of April, 2008, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal
& Topics on the 9th day of April, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to
the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ- 09-08; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given
consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the
Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the
Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF
THEIR HOME RULE POWERS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
grant a Conditional Use, as provided in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Code, to allow the operation
of a sports training facility, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"
SECTION THREE: Prior to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use,
the following conditions and/or written documentation shall be fulfilled:
B
Page 2/2
PZ- 09-08, 1920 S. Carboy Road
A. Development of the unit shall be in general conformance with the floor plan prepared by the
Athletic Barn; submitted March 25, 2008 to the Community Development Department.
B. The facility shall meet all building and fire codes for a new assembly occupancy. Prior
to the issuance of a building permit, the petitioner shall submit an egress analysis for the
proposed facility. Any modifications to the fire alarm system as a result ofthis analysis shall be
performed by the petitioner prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
C. A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of
Mount Prospect must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of this ordinance
authorizing the development proposal by the Village Board. The development approvals
granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall
become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and
improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this
Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval
and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:ICLKOIfilesl WINIORD INANCIC USE 1920carboyathleticbarnmay2008 doc
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
Mount Prospect
MEMORANDUM
TO:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
~.~
.;:/,.108
FROM:
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
APRIL 25, 2008
SUBJECT:
PZ-38-07 - CONDITIONAL USE AND V ARIA nONS (ROW
DEVELOPMENT)
309-313 W. PROSPECT AVE.
PAUL SWANSON ASSOC. INC. (APPLICANT)
The petitioner, Paul Swanson Associates Inc., is seeking approval for a Conditional Use to allow
dwelling units on the ground floor, and variations for front yard building setback, rear yard building
setback, and building height, for the Swanson Rowhome Project located at 309-313 W. Prospect
A venue.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday,
March 27, 2008, and by a vote of 4-0, with two members absent, recommended approval of a
Conditional Use to allow dwelling units on the ground floor, and variations for front yard building
setback, rear yard building setback, and building height, for the Swanson Rowhome Project. Details of
the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included
in the attached minutes.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their May 6, 2008 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this
matter.
H \PLAN\PlllIlIling & Zoning COMM\P&Z 200H\MEJ Mcmo\PZ.)M-07 Prospect Avenue Townhomcs (SwansonL042808.doc
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CASE NO. PZ-38-07
Hearing Date: March 27, 2008
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
309-313 W. Prospect Ave.
PETITIONER:
Paul Swanson Assoc. Inc.
PUBLICATION DATE:
October 10, 2007
PIN NUMBERS:
08-11-205-010/011/012
REQUESTS:
Conditional Use approval to allow dwelling units on the ground floor
Variations - setbacks, building height
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Richard Rogers, Chair
Leo Floros
Marlys Haaland
Keith Youngquist
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Joseph Donnelly
Ronald Roberts
ST AFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development
Brian Simmons, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
INTERESTED PARTIES:
Paul Swanson, Desi Flynn
Chairman Richard Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. After roll call, Chairman Rogers stated that
they have the minimum amount of Planning and Zoning Commission Members for a quorum. In order for a case
to receive a positive recommendation, a unanimous vote must occur. The voting for the minutes from the January
24, 2008 meeting were held over until the next meeting since only two members were present from that meeting.
Chairman Rogers introduced case number PZ-38-07, a request for a Conditional Use approval and Variations (3-
unit rowhome development) at 309-313 W. Prospect Ave., at 7:35 p.m.
William Cooney, Director of Community Development, stated that the properties were currently vacant grass lots.
He said that the proposal is for a three unit townhome facing Prospect Avenue with vehicular access off of West
Busse Avenue. The townhomes would be a masonry structure with a residential roofline and a series of expansive
windows.
Mr. Cooney said that the Staff report indicated concerns regarding the eastern elevation, only one window was
shown on the original proposal; this has since been updated by the Petitioner.
Mr. Cooney discussed the current uses on Prospect Avenue. He stated that Staff is opposed to the proposal
because Prospect Avenue is more of a commercial, office, and retail roadway.
Mr. Cooney showed a table regarding setbacks and variation requests. The Staff's recommendation was to deny
the current proposal. Mr. Cooney said that Staff would prefer an office on the first level with residential units
above.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-38-07
Page 2
Chairman Rogers swore in Paul Swanson, 401 E. Prospect Ave., Mount Prospect, IL. Mr. Swanson discussed his
background in developing projects and properties. He said he did a study regarding building a professional office
space or medical space. He stated the size of a commercial building or medical space was limited due to the
setbacks. He also said that the site is unfeasible from a cost and market standpoint. Mr. Swanson stated that there
is currently a 20% vacancy rate in the Northwest suburbs that includes Mount Prospect. He said the property is
too small for mixed use.
Mr. Swanson stated that the proposal is for three townhomes. He summarized three reasons why townhomes
would be acceptable for the site: close walking distance to the train station, close proximity to downtown
amenities, and the current market would support the development.
Mr. Swanson said the current project would provide 2000 square feet of living space and 400 square feet for
garages. He said townhomes on the site would double the amount of property taxes if an office building was on
the property. He stated that the proposed development is consistent with the surrounding land use. Mr. Swanson
showed pictures of other properties along Prospect Ave. that showed residential buildings next to
commercial/office buildings.
Mr. Swanson stated that he had a letter from his planner. He summarized the letter that emphasized surrounding
land use and the trend in development works for this project.
Mr. Swanson showed the site plan and landscape plan that included an open area on the East side of the property.
He also showed the floor plan, North elevation, and discussed using green items for this proposed project.
Mr. Swanson said he will need Variations due to the location of the rear balconies and front patios that enter into
the setbacks. He needs a Conditional Use for living space on the first floor in a B-5 zone.
Mr. Swanson concluded by asking the Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend approval so the proposed
project could move to the Village Board.
Chairman Rogers asked the Petitioner if he has read the conditions placed in the Staff report and asked if he
agreed to them. Mr. Swanson stated that he did agree.
Chairman Rogers swore in Desi Flynn, 107 S. Elmhurst Ave., Mount Prospect, IL. Mr. Flynn stated that Mr.
Swanson did stop by his residence and explain the proposed project. Mr. Flynn believed that the property would
be an ideal location for a downtown park and playground; due to the odd layout of the lots.
Mr. Swanson stated that he visited the surrounding residential neighbors in the fall and most recently with the
proposed elevations that have been presented. He said that seven of the nine residents favored a residential
development for this parcel of land.
There was general discussion about creating a park. Chairman Rogers stated that the proposed case was not about
purchasing the land or developing a park.
Chairman Rogers asked if anyone else wanted to discuss the case. Hearing none, the public discussion was closed
and brought back to the Commission.
Keith Youngquist said from Mount Prospect Road to Central Avenue, Prospect Avenue could not make up its
mind on what it wants to be. He stated a variety of different uses extend along the street. Mr. Youngquist said
that he understands what the Village wants to do with a mixed-use development, but he believed that this
particular site does not allow for it. He concluded by reiterating that there is no consistency along Prospect
Avenue and commended the Petitioner for his research on a variety of uses for the property.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-38-07
Page 3
Chairman Rogers said the area is on the back side of the railroad and the reason for zoning is for some uniformity
along the way. He also commended the Petitioner for research completed as well. Chairman Rogers agreed that
the site is too small for offices.
Leo Floros asked the Petitioner how long the previous owner had owned the land. Mr. Swanson stated that he did
not know, but the previous owner presently owns the apartment building to the West of the site.
Mr. Floros said that this property has been vacant forever and believed the proposal is logical and practical to the
area. He believed that this would be a valuable addition to that section of town.
Mr. Floros made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission accept the proposal as presented with the
conditions placed by Staff, case number PZ-38-07, a request for a Conditional Use to allow dwelling units on the
ground floor and Variations that included setbacks and the building height; Keith Youngquist seconded the
motion.
UPON ROLL CALL:
AYES: Floros, Haaland, Youngquist, Rogers
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 4-0.
After hearing two additional cases, Keith Youngquist made a motion to adjourn at 10:30 p.m. The motion was
approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
d/l
/?
./../1 /
/%~
Ryan Kast, Community Development
Administrative Assistant
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 38-07
LOCATION:
PETITIONER:
OWNER:
PARCEL #:
LOT SIZE:
ZONING:
LAND USE:
REQUEST:
309-17 W. Prospect A venue
Paul Swanson Assoc. Inc.
309 West Prospect, LLC
08-11-205-010-0000/08-11-205-011-0000 / 08-11-205-012-0000
0.23 acres
B5 Central Commercial
Vacant lot
1) Conditional Use approval to allow dwelling units on the ground floor (Sec.14.1904)
2) Variations - setbacks, building height (Sec. 14.1905)
LOCATION MAP
W.CE~TRAL RD_
_W BUSSE AV
MEMORANDUM
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2007
HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2007
SUBJECT: PZ-38-07 - CONDITIONAL USE & V ARIA nONS (ROWHOME DEVELOPMENT)
309-17 W. PROSPECT AVE. -PAUL SWANSON ASSOC. INC. (APPLICANT)
BACKGROUND
A public hearing has been scheduled for the December 13, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to
review the application by Paul Swanson Associates Inc. (the "Petitioner"), regarding the property located at 309-
17 W. Prospect Ave. (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking: I} Conditional Use approval to allow
dwellings on the ground floor, and 2) Variations for the front and rear setbacks and the building height. The P&Z
Commission hearing was properly noticed in the October 10, 2007 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In
addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted Public
Hearing signs on the Subject Property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located at the intersection of Prospect Ave. and Elmhurst Avenue, north of Busse Avenue,
and currently contains an unimproved grassy lot. The Subject Property consists of three lots of record and has an
irregular triangular shape. It is zoned B5 Central Commercial and is bordered by the RA Single Family District to
the south, B5 Central Commercial to the west and east, and the Metra rail road tracks to the north, across Prospect
A venue. 4-hour on-street parking is available along the north side of Prospect A venue, and 2-hour on-street
parking is available on Busse Avenue, Elmhurst Avenue, and the south side of Prospect Avenue.
SUMMARY
The Petitioner's proposal includes redevelopment of the site as a 3-unit rowhome development. The various
elements ofthe proposal are outlined below:
Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development - The Subject Property is zoned B5 Central Commercial, which
is intended to accommodate retail and specialty shops, and business, professional, and civic uses characteristic of
a traditional downtown area. The Petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use permit because the development has
dwellings on the first floor. The project would be a permitted use and not require a Conditional Use permit if it
included a retail component on the ground floor.
Site Plan - The attached site plan illustrates the proposed layout for the 3-unit rowhome development. The
development consists of one building with the front elevation along Prospect Ave. and the rear elevation along
PZ-38-07
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting December 13, 2007
Page 3
Busse Avenue; vehicles will access to the development from Busse Avenue. The orientation of the Subject
Property to the surrounding properties dictates classifying the Prospect A venue property line as the front lot line.
Although the Subject Property is zoned B5, some setbacks regulations are applicable to the project because the
existing buildings on Prospect A venue were developed with a front setback, which dictates the rowhome
development having a front setback (Sec. 14.1905.B). Also, the single family residences to. the south triggers a
transitional setback requirement (Sec. 14.1905.F). The following table lists the Bulk Regulations for the B5
District, and the italicized text denotes setbacks that require relief from the Village's Bulk Regulations.
ard
Building Design - The enclosed elevations indicate the architectural composition of the rowhomes. The units are
3-story rowhomes, with attached rear loading garages on the first floor, and a balcony above it. Each of the
rowhome units would have a separate entrance, a two-car garage, and the ability to park two cars behind each
garage. The development includes a 10'xI2' patio for each unit along Prospect Avenue.
The Petitioner prepared elevations to indicate the general look of the building. The building materials for the
exterior elevations include face brick and decorative CMU on the ground floor. The elevations indicate the front
elevation will include expansive windows, sliding glass doors, and a wrought iron "Juliet" balcony. The rear
elevations include the balcony, accessed by a sliding glass door, several typical windows, and the 2-car garage
door. The proposed east elevation (Prospect/Elmhurst intersection) calls for mostly a solid wall comprised of
brick face and decorative CMU, broken up by one window. As that is a highly visible elevation, Staff
recommends revising it to include multiple decorative windows and or some sort of design elements that create
architectural interest. In general, Staff finds the elevations to reflect a single family detached design, not in
keeping with a traditional downtown rowhome design.
The building will have a peaked roof and the HV AC equipment would be located at grade, adjacent to the
garages. The height of the building measured at the midpoint is 31.25' which requires relief from the Zoning
Ordinance as the height limitation in the BS District is 30' from the mid-point of the roof.
The Petitioner's plans indicate wall mounted lights will be installed. This was called out in response to the Police
Department's requirements. Also, the Crime Prevention Unit requires that the addresses be installed under the
photocell light fixtures and that the front and rear of the units display the address. This will ensure optimal
visibility/identification for emergency vehicles.
Parking - The Petitioner's proposal indicates each unit would include 3 bedrooms plus a recreation room in the
basement, which could be converted to a bedroom or an office. The Village Code requires 2 Y2 parking spaces per
dwelling unit (for multiple-family dwellings containing 3 bedrooms or more). The Petitioner's proposal contains
a 2-car garage plus two driveway parking spaces per unit. In addition, on-street parking is available; however the
on-street spaces are not available for overnight parking.
Lot Coverage - The B5 District does not have a lot coverage limitation. However, the Petitioner's Development
Data sheet indicates that the project would have approximately 24% lot coverage. The project is subject to all
development requirements as detailed in Sec. 15.402 of the Village Code.
PZ-38-07
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting December 13, 2007
Page 4
Landscape Plan - The Petitioner's landscape plan indicates that a variety of new landscaping materials will be
planted throughout the development. The landscape plan indicates that shade and ornamental trees will be the
primary screening material around the perimeter of the Subject Property. Flowering shrubs and Arborvitae will
be installed along the foundation of the units and the patios.
Engineering - The Petitioner submitted preliminary storm water detention plans as part of their initial submittal.
However, the site is eligible to participate in the Village's 'fee in lieu of' program (Sec. 16.606). The Petitioner is
required to prepare site engineering plans as part of the Building permit process and Staff will review the plans at
that time to confirm code compliance.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING
The property is located along a collector street and it is adjacent to 3-flat apartment building, single family
residences, and offices. The recently updated Comprehensive Land Use Map designates the subject properties as
Central Commercial, which calls for "a dense, intensive land use pattern focusing on an urban style of
development and architecture." The Comp Plan further notes that the Central Commercial areas should contain a
mix of land uses, allowing for high density residential developments.
GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE
As previously noted, the proposal does not comply with the B5 Bulk Regulations. The following table provides
zoning district information for the property's proposed zoning classification and summarizes the proposed
setbacks.
Zoning
District
B5
Pro osed
VARIATION STANDARDS
The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 ofthe Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven
specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these
findings:
. A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person
presently having an interest in the property;
· Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
. Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
Prior to accepting this proposal, Staff met with the Petitioner several times. The project went through several
modifications to create a design that works within the physical site constraints of an irregular lot shape and the
required transitional setbacks.
PZ-38-07
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting December 13,2007
Page 5
The Zoning Ordinance requires a front and rear setback although the property is zoned B5, a district that typically
does not have setback requirements. One of the reasons for the proposed rear setback Variation stems from the
Petitioner providing a 3-foot interior side yard setback and wanting to preserve green space along the east lot line.
Per Code, the building could be built up to the side lot lines, but the Petitioner decided a 3-foot setback would be
more appropriate as the residents may appreciate allowing for some ventilation and or window access. If the
building had a O-interior setback, the building could be shifted west, creating less of an encroachment into the rear
yard. However, the balconies would still encroach into the rear setback. The balcony and patio encroachments
will have a minor impact on the adjacent properties and the character of the neighborhood because, while each are
technically structures, the patios and balconies are unenclosed and would remain unenclosed.
The Petitioner included a peaked roofline to be in keeping with the adjacent single family residences. However,
in order to have the peaked roof and still have adequate ceiling heights, relief from the maximum building height
is required as the building measure 1.25-feet more than the maximum height permitted in the B5 District. The
Petitioner has the option of reducing the ceiling height from 9-feet to 8-feet for the main floor, but it was
explained to Staff that the additional foot creates a roomier, bigger space, which is integral to the rowhome
design.
CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section l4.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include
seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary
of these findings:
. The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare;
. The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
. There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion
on Village streets; and
· The request is in compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan,
Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances.
The proposal is not consistent with the surrounding land uses along Prospect Avenue. The predominant land use
along Prospect between Central Road and Rt. 83 is retail and office. Staff believes that the Subject Property is
best suited for a mixed use project with offices on the first floor or as an office only development.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Conditional Use and Variation requests fails to meet the standards for each request as listed in the
Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the
following motion:
"To approve:
I) a Conditional Use permit for a 3-unit rowhome development subject to:
a. The three (3) separate lots must be consolidated.
PZ-38-07
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting December 13, 2007
Page 6
b. The right of way at the intersection of Busse A venue and Elmhurst A venue should be squared off. The
curved sidewalk should be removed, and new sidewalk along Busse A venue should be installed to the
comer.
c. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan and landscape prepared by Paul
Swanson Associates, dated November 8, 2007;
d. Development of the units in general conformance with the floor plans prepared by Paul Swanson
Associates, dated November 8, 2007;
e. Development of the elevations in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Paul Swanson
Associates, dated November 8, 2007 but revised so the east elevation includes architectural interest;
f. Prior to obtaining the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Petitioner must submit homeowner's
association documents for Staff review and approval that include text stating on-street over night
parking is prohibited; and
g. The Petitioner shall construct all units according to all Village Codes and regulations, including, but not
limited to: the installation of automatic fire sprinklers.
2) Variation approval to allow:
a) 13' front yard (Prospect Avenue)
b) 25' rear yard (Busse Ave.)
c) 31.25' building height (midpoint)."
The Village Board's decision is final for this case, 309-17 W. Prospect Avenue, Case No. PZ-38-07.
I concur:
w~~~ ~,
William J. . oney, AICP, lfector ofCommumty Development
Ijmc H:\PLAN\Planning &: Zonina COMM\P&.z 2007\Staff Mcmo\PZ.38.07 MEMO (309.13 W Prospect Ave townbome project Conditional Usc).doc
\L.t;V\ ~t:D \ '/e1/67
'c::'0(l. L.oMme...:r~
VILtA<JE-"0F-M-otJNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Application for Conditional Use A.pproval
....MoUnt~'"
'Ii' fi::::~~~~~;;,jj':~'~i~#:;[~1!,:;;:,)~;:\' ::':':',~::' <; " , "" ..',;' ,""j' , .'" "j' " , ; , '
~ ~'~'teQf'S'bliii"iP~ "'" ,',;~,1 ',' 'j,' ',' '", ,';. " "., "".."'".' ,; 'nt,;:, '",;".'."', " ,
.~' ,,' lI..,iDf p,~~ ,';", ,,"", ;~~1;~~i:j~~J~~W~;jiil~l[';~iJtil~~!1~~;I~~jii.;~ ",i,,,, , '"",Fi:: " ~~~iii', ' " '
Address(es) (Street Number, Street) - 1tzo
?:> VAl:.I\1..Jr L.t>r~ ; ~Oq I 31 \ ~ 31'3 W.. . ~f7e~\ AV6:
Site Area (Acres) pro.g1 Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site)
~ 2,?,(Go W\utJr
Setbacks: . VAr~-A.r--.rr
Front Rear Side Side
~ - - - -
...
(-l Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
f - - -
-
Adjacent Land Uses:
North South East West
f: R 12..1fzAVK~ t2.A '?1N bLf ~ ~5 (.() tf\ '1'1\' L "8S \1\lJ\....i 1=Af./f .
... Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
CI)
~ OB -\ 1-7.t>, -~IO ...~()~O , t)~.- H - W; "'0' I- t>ll9O j DB -~ \ - 2OS--012 ..tJt)6l;
I
.
(-l
CI)
><
~ Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary)
LOTS 40, 4 I AND 42 IN H. ROY BERRY CO.'S COLONIAL MANOR, BEING A "
SUBDIVISION OF PART OF mE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION I I AND PART OF
tHE NORTIlWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANOE I I
EAST OF THE TIlIRD PRJNCIPAL MERJDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
-
Z Name VAu L.. tSW,^I\J~" 0 ,..J Telephone (day)
0 'lf4-i - "1 f) - to, l ()
~
i, Corporation V -Au t.. ~'-\}-A I\J~~ ~"". ,p c... Telephone (evening)
!;-
Z ~ Street Address Fax t&Jr'7 -~1p- ~ 713
... .- 401 1;::... fl2u71>;;.t..T *V~
Q]:
~< City "1' State Zip Code Email ?~A 481 e ~Bk &\..D~l..
01
= WI ~ tJb~t'"e(.,-r H""' b /)O~{R . t.J~--r
~ .
:lII: Interest in Property
U
< ~f)P.J:T'rz..AU-r' -Pu 1"2.J"'.""-J L""..-.
=
. V'" '-V'"" \Ii' 'V' ::>
- Telephone (day)
~ Name o · I J '"' I.J. .t, '-t,..--V-t-A- m ".,. LS.~
-- ~47- q11....q;~9----
"" ...... I ~- "T
j'
Corporation Telephone (evening)
~J - II
~R Street Address q e ~ Ef - 'f"A()"'2. V It: W Fax:
oJ: -
llIl1
~ City State Zip Code Email
-~ AD- L.-~ tJ't'1otJ ~b1? b bPp~r -
l(.,
Developer 1/AvL-- ~i,6(~bJ ~'t7- k;7D"'t:, i 10
Name Telephone (day)
-
Address 401 ~, 'V~fet.--r ~~ Fax ~41-&::'7e-"13
wrr.. \?~~f\!G.'" , I ~ ~~b_ 'PM 4l>\e.S'8C--
Email b<-D5'c. t.. - Ue:T
Attorney /"..
Name Telephone (day) -
/' -
Address Fax
,.
Email ,
Surveyor ~t)'HN ~tJ'l2-\l<~aN Telephone (day) ~7; ;q~- t)1D1
z Name
8, --
t-o; Address r;7~ t;:..tJ'r\J "'b'1' Fax ~+7 - ij?- t93~ 'Z-
j .~ --
1:>e.,f, 7~A.u,.Je.~ 1 L b/){), ~'-_ JotW*eN't2.~ K"~Ne-SU ~1-
o l'J I , u~T
~~ Email
~
~5 Engineer 17eA(2..~ ~W,..l* ~'htK.~. t~~
[ Name Telephone (day) ~1- 3b7-b7~7
o 0 f.(), WI t.J~..h~bfe:(2. t2'D '7~rr~ 11> ;
=:- l ~ 170 ~-r~ 3b7 - 'Z~1
~ Address Fax
~~
u, l-'1?~(2.:riVlVi-G I I~.. IPlJI)4f;
~ Email
Architect ~ -t;w~-~ ':DJ..J It .l:JbP~ ~ ,,J f::- ~'1-' 7/)....b1 Jl>
Name AUL- Telephone (day):
Address 40' ~.. 17p.1)~lU:r -k'Ie Fax '647 -(P7IJ -b113
V\1"f, 17m':1-peL..-T I I~ btJl)~ b 1'?/.. 401 e t;JU,f:M;SN.'" tJr:r
Email
-
Landscape Architect .'
Name ~ ~U;T3':,/ tz~",J . AI,?~(; .. Telephone (day): '3l1.- ""~... ~U,.-
, -
Address '~2, N. ?A.tJ01;cJCUy :fe~_ Fax '"3('2- 3'31- f7~t)
t.#i J\\.- ~()hlO
Email
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois
... .... ... ~............. _.....6. _ ...
Phone 847.818.5328
Fax 847.818.5329
..
.............""" 1ft.... ...^_ ,^,.
Setbacks:
Front I Rear I
'2' 'Bl-D 2.S' Ije U>~\,)eo ~\.
Buil~ng Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
.~ WlS\,,) \U61 f '24 t "Z
"p ~r ,
Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all r~quired plans and other
materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly
suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy
and completeness at the time of submittal.
Q
~
r-!;;
o~
U
enS
E-o
U
<
~z
Co
en-
QE-o
~~
=-'0
~~
=-.
Proposed Conditional Use (as listed in the zoning district)
Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Proposed and How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary)
t .. tzf71'OecU'Tl-fd... ~t ,,(J \?:! "F~rz..
"2. V A\'Z-IANCe:~ :
A") r~-r '1'Mn> ?~,. ~K
CD~\Ju..'DoJ'1 'To 2? 1 L J.? I VAv7.I~ti ~M ';Zt..5'Av, ~r~
7'2'\ .p \ /. I.. t'v '6l-~ \
If:::.) I ~ Iltl? I ~ l' :\ .5VA,'fl.MN::.f: I I I, II" )
e'J t2GAr2. YAn-1? LTJ2.A~\r\l9~L.-)?6 (--~N=-~
cD 'BUI j..'01 JJ C oS€: tBlZIJetl-)"'~ '27' L 6' \~P.I~~.fi)t>M
~ I ~cn-bA~K.)
-HbT 12:80F 3; ( D mc:::A.tJ ~ (~n..,~ F~M 30'
Hours of Operation '7 &1l~': 6 ~(~~ II 'I)
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
Site Area (Acres)
.23~
Property Zoning
~'5'
Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site)
7 2~~?F
Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use
7 2 t1>tf) ";f
Side
~
NI'r
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well liS all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be
given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized repr(:sentative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the
owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents pennission to enter on the property during
reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property.
I hereby affirm that a 'nfo mation provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and
accurate to the best y owledge.
Applicant
Print Name
taeVi~
,,/?; 1~-r
Date
If applicant is not property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this
application and the associated supporting material.
Property Owner \2~ }..\..'ttJ ~ t, I~VI"^ W\-E.'1en.~ _ Date
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois
www.mountprospect.org
3
Phone 847.818.5328
Fax 847.818.5329
TDD 847.392.6064
DEVELOPMENT DATA
1118/07
PROPOSED THREE UNIT TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT
309-313 W. Prospect Avenue
EXISTING ZONING
LAND AREA
B-5
10,002 SF
BUILDING AREA
3 DU @ 2400 SF EACH
(Three Floors @ 800 SFIDU)
7,200 SF
FAR
LOT COVERAGE
PARKING
.72
.24
12 Cars
Interior 6
Exterior (Guest Parking) 6
TRASH
Handled individually as single family homes
BUILDING HEIGHT
30'
VARIATION/CONDITIONAL USE" REQUIRED
1. Residential use on first floor
2. Front yard setback variance along Prospect Avenue
a) Building to 25'
b) Patios to 13'
3. Building height - 36' to top of roof
4. Rear yard setback - 5' Variance for building and balcony at southeast
corner of building.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PI~OSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Application for Conditional Use Approval
Mount Prospect
z
o
._r.
~.~
~=
00
c_ ~
-IS
!lO
><-
~..
.~..
-
Address(es) (Street Number, Street) . "3 '* 3i3 ~v.. "VlZO?pe.cr A vs.
?:> \J1.Ac..A.u r L.or"S; ~Oq I . 1 \
Site Area (Acres) Property Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) I
;p2.~~ 136' W\['Il~ r
Setbacks: VA{'_AN'
Front Rear Side Side
Z - .- ~---' -
0
-
E-o Building Height Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
< -
~ - - -
0 Adjacent Land Uses:
r. North South East West
Z
- RQ~K~ \2..f\ tJ1 Nbu:. ~ tbg t..t- ..., "f'r,i L 13!7 miJL:.1"i 1=AN1.
~
E-o Tax J.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
-
r'-l
~ OfS-\ [-2tl? -tllO .--6CfJO '" tJ8- I i- W; '''0' i .-~t:6YJ ~ DB -l \ - 207'-01'2 -/)OOC
~ :; J
,
E-o
r'-l
-
><
~ Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary)
LOTS 40, 41 AND 42 IN H. ROY BERRY CO.'S COLONIAL MANOR, BEING A .
SUBDIVISION OF PART OF TIlE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION II AND PART OF
THE NORTIlWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 41 NORm, RANGE II
EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLlNOIS.
z
o
...
- --<
~I
0....
~ B
... .-
Q-a
z.s-
:;J......
01
~
~
U
<
=
Name f7
t' A~ L- C;~^f\J OJ O,..J
Corporation--17----------.---.---- - --- . - - - -~.. -
f~j.. S"\)-A/u~,J ,A17;JtL,. II-) ~
Telephone (day)
~4'7.... (;1 D ..- b-r i {)
-Telephone (evening)- -
Street Address
401 ~..'rl2ui?~T
City iMl r oj) State
fit., ~ JJb~1'et--r . (..--.
Fax
*\i'~
Zip Code
b ttJ~lJl
~1-(,1p- 6-7t.3
Emailp ~A 4-e'i <2 ~8,l, &: \..,,~'-
.. t.,Jirl"
Interest in Property
L.Ci\.1'TIZ-^,,-r -pu L'2-c.'",^S~ c:L.
-
Z Name R t. l.-i.-y"j ~ ~ \I....\ll A Telephone (day)
0 "tY\ ~ l' E.r2.~
- t047..- {l1'1 ....ci;59
E-<
i I Corporation
.. Telephone (evening)
u ---
o ~ 1/
~o
~~ Street Address Fax:
~~ Cfst:, tf. 't="^,p.V'cvJ
o e --
~Q..
t.:Il City State Zip Code Email
~
U ACkI..-.iJt11"tJ #b\? ~L..-- b Gtip~ --
<
=
-
Developer VAVL- 0~v,^D'7t J 4lt1- b'7D-b 71 ()
Name Telephone (day)
Address 4t'i ~, 'ftU';'feGf AvjJ Fax 't$41--1o'1!) - ".7 (3
t'vrr, '\?PoL;~O( J lj, &"'~b ?~ 4bt€.:5iB&
c-y)t'+:J "
Email b--D~L" ~r:;.-,
Attorney
Name /~ Telephone (day)
Address /' Fax
,f"
Email
Surveyor .~D.hN
Z Name .\t€ N 'l2-l \( ~E,...j Telephone (day) ~34-7 .. ?1J7- OJbI
0
""'" I
!-o '" Address t;7/v EO' i'hJ \.tb"-C Fax ~+7- 1'117- t)3t 2-
<";i;
~ .~ 1) \? ~ 1'LA \lU c:.b lL boD" '--'
JotWHEN12.\ Kt,~i'J~-S'8C b\.llML.
o~ I - 'b , UET
~~ Email
~5 Engineer Ve,ac(2..~ ~-U;I..J~ *' ^~t0. ,~&
;J e Name Telephone (day) io4i.- 3ii7-b1()7
08- lV... t.f,.,."JL.t1e~f~\Z i2:D ~~rr~ 'WJ ~
~'U l~~b 3b7- 2~7
~ > Address Fax '04:'1-
~O
VI l....rgeo..f1VlwG I & V., {;lJ/)4fJ
<
= Email
Architect ---p, ~It:~tl),u ~'1- b tiP....b.? ~D
Name AUL- A ':JbCC. 0' j rJ c.. Telephone (day):
Address 40\ ~ ::z - .- f'(\/C Fax 'tA'1'-&7D-b"1i3
". 1U}'1'p~ ,
VVl--r, 1?Ot71:iV~Pf I t~ fyb\()'5 b l'~ AeJ e~B~bi-c~^L...~~r
Email
-.--- -.- --------..- .- -Name--.---1~Cc'13~1 rz,,(AJA~~(,~t"-, ~ . Telephone (day): -- '3rr--Gb~~ --3u."('-- ..
,
Address '~2:1 N. ~Aty~D'&'eir =1~~ Fax 'j{.:z.... 3'3'1- f~t3t)
tAt; I'''' &0(;'0
Email
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois
Phone 847.818.5328
Fax 847.818.5329
Proposed Conditional Use (as listed in the zoning district)
Describe in Detail the Buildings and Activities Propo~:;r;;d How the Proposed Use Meets the Attached Standards for
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets if necessary)
---1" tzt:~l'"P€1\J T i f\L U~6 Sol . .
Q CLIJ \:- t=-'--
. ,.
~ '? \J A\L' A(vIt-~ i,v 'Ht" '1 '1' A.\i~\) '7€ r 1St\~ "Frzt'fv1
~~ -- . ...(,-0
O~ ./'ttG AVI{E. f2-^t1 f3f(?t, 1\J'1 ~~z;.D ~E: r & JJ -rtt~ '1~ t..-/J b\~
>c;;J 'PA?LL
~~ \.-
O~ ZG.~I 'Tt.~ ,
~~ tL)'&J\\;'1)i.0~?j 2.'5 I ( \~"~ \
PO '. \JI:'J/7,'A~c
(/J....
Eo-< b) 'VA1,t~ -rt,~ \'21 (--. I )
u \ 4,t;'\1 Af)..iA~G .
<
i) 13Al- ~~.tti7. -0 tC1,," T~ VAn"A~~\
I
Hours of Operation 1
Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
~Z Site Area (Acres) ProQerty Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Sq. Ft. Devoted to Proposed Use
1::0
(/J.... . l ?:N2.(/ '65" 7 tJtJo SF 7,t/i') ~ F
cE-
~~ Setbacks:
~O Front 6'~' Rear l Side Side
Or-. ' 2-' l,.'cx, '?() Nit ~iA
&:~ Building Height l Lot Coverage (%) Number of Parking Spaces
;;;0 .1.; to
Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other
materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly
suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy
and completeness at the time of submittal. .
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be
given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized repmsentative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the
owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during
reasonable hours for visual inspection ofthe subject property.
I hereby affirm th~llt' ormation provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and
accurate to the be f knowledge.
Applicant ' . t~ . Date '1} '2b IOf
Print Name 'ffrl,h... '7;w A ;..Y::t;),0
If applicant is not property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the: purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this
application and the associated supporting material.
~~
Property Owner
Mount Prospect Department of Community Development
50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois
Af-r1t4-l€D L.7tt~E:f
Date
'1
Phone 847.818.5328
Fax 847.818.5329
'T'T"'\n QL1.'7 .,,0') t:;(\t:;.d.
DEVELOPER PROFILE
PAUL SWANSON
PRESIDENT
PAUL SWANSON ASSOCIATES INC.
401 E. PROSPECT AVENUE, SUITE 201
MT. PROSPECT IL 60056
Graduated from University of Michigan 1963 Bachelor of Architecture
Professional Organizations: ALA Association of Licensed Architects
NCARB National Council of Architectural Boards
Licensed Architect: State of Illinois State of North Carolina
Licensed Real Estate Broker:
Illinois
DEVELOPMENT EXPERIENCE
OFFICE BUILDING DEVELOPMENT
(Professional & Medical) VALUE
2,800,000 SF
$310,000,000
HOTEL RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT
$25,000,000
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
VALUE
4,200,000 SF
$250,000,000
VALUE
1,200,000 SF
$130,000,000
RETAIL DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
VALUE
(Single family, condominium, townhomes,
apartments)
$55,000,000
ARCHITECT/DEVELOPER PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
PAUL W. SWANSON
1963 - Graduate of University of Michigan with a Bachelors degree in
Arch itectu re.
1965 - Joined ARTHUR SWANSON & ASSOCIATES, an architectural firm
founded in 1940 by his father Arthur P. Swanson.
1970 - Founded PAUL SWANSON ASSOCIATES, a real estate brokerage and
development firm.
1978 - Bought out ARTHUR SWANSON & ASSOCIATES
1985 - Co-founded CD GROUP, a design/build construction company which
does an annual construction volume of $10-20 million per year.
1986 - Founded the DEVON GROUP, a real estate development company to
develop and manage condominium, apartment, townhouse, office and
retail properties in the Chicago area.
1990 - Founded PAUL SWANSON ASSOCIATES INC. , an architectural design
firm, successor to Arthur Swanson & Associates.
PAUL W. SWANSON is a registered architect and president of PAUL
SWANSON ASSOCIATES INC., successor to Arthur Swanson & Associates,
Ltd., an architectural firm with over 40 years experience in the design of
commercial and residential properties. Mr. Swanson has been involved in real
estate development for the past twenty years. Some of his completed
commercial developments include:
. One Northbrook Place, a 200,000 SF office building in
Northbrook, IL.
. Northbrook Tech Center, a 70,000 SF high tech industrial
project in Northbrook, IL.
. Renovated the Americana Inn in Des Plaines, IL to a 150 room
Comfort Inn (Quality Inn franchise).
. Development of a 204 unit luxury apartment complex in
Arlington Heights, IL.
. 132 unit condominium conversion in Burr Ridge, IL.
ARCHITECTURAL/DEVELOPER BACKGROUND
PAUL W. SWANSON
Page 2
. In partnership, converted an industrial building in Rosemont, IL
into his offices and leased the remaining office space.
In addition the firm has provided architectural and construction services as well
as construction management supervision to other developers and financial
institutions, including a joint venture of an eight story, 300,000 SF office building
in Schaumburg, IL for Mutual of New York.
Mr. Swanson has designed/developed over 6 million square feet of office,
industrial and commercial properties, and his unique professional experience as
architect, contractor and developer gives a special insight and ability to deal
effectively with today's complex real estate industry.
OFFICE FEASIBILITY STUDY
A. Professional Office Development
1750 SF One story building on slab
7 Car Parking
Land Cost $200,000 + $20,000 carry
Hard Costs*
Building Shell & Site 1750 SF x $155/SF =
Interior Build-out 1750 SF x $65/SF =
Total Hard Costs
Soft Costs
Architecture, Engineering, Legal, Accounting,
Construction interest, R. E. taxes, etc.
20% x hard cost =
Total Development Cost
($390/SF)
Feasibilitv
Required Rent Assume Rent 10% return
$39/SF + $6/ SF CAM =
Market Rent (Incl. $6/SF CAM)
Study Result
Unfeasible
B. Medical Office Development
1400 SF One story building on slab
7 cars x 250 SF
Land Cost $200,000 + $20,000 carry
Hard Costs*
Building Shell & Site 1400 SF x $155/SF =
Interior Build-out 1400 SF x $145/SF =
Total Hard Costs
January 22, 2008
$220,000.00
$271,000.00
J114.000.00
$385,000.00
$ 77,000.00
$682,000.00
$44/SFG
$16-$20/SF
$220,000.00
$217,000.00
J203.000.00
$420,000.00
Soft Costs
Architecture, Engineering, Legal, Accounting,
Construction interest, R.E. taxes, etc.
20% x hard cost=
Total Development Cost ($517/SF)
$ 84,000.00
$724,000.00
Feasibility
Required Rent Assume 10% return
$52/SF + $8/SF CAM =
Market Rent
$60/SF
$35-$41/SF
Study Result
Unfeasible
*Hard cost estimates by CD Group Contractors
"
lb
~
~
M
t>-
'"
~
~
.
3
r
./
I .
:..:
t
"\
j
'j,..
. ~.., >
FEASIBILITY STUDY
THREE TOWNHOMES
Land Cost
Hard Cost
Building 60'x 40' = 2400 SF/FL x 3 = 7200 SF -1200 SF
of garage area = 6000 SF x $105/SF =
Landscaping
Total Hard & Hard Cost
Soft Cost
Architecture, Engineering, Legal, Accounting,
Interest & R.E. tax during construction, etc.
20% x $630,000 =
Total Development Cost
Income
Gross Income 3 x $475,000/DU =
Marketing 6% x $1,425,000 =
Net Income
Profit
January 22, 2008
$220,000.00
$630,000.00
J 20,000.00
$870,000.00
$126,000.00
$996,000.00
$1,425,000.00
J - 85,000.00
$1,340,000.00
$344,000.00
CBRE
CB RICHARD ELLIS
Mark C. Smith
Senior Vice President
20 N. Martingale Road, Suite 100
Schaumburg, IL 60173
CB Richard Ellis, Inc.
Office Properties
T 84770649]6
F 8477064959
mark.smith@cbre.com
www.cbre.com
February 28,2008
RE: Offlce Development, .309 ~ Prospect Avenue, Mt. Prospect, IL
Dear Mr. Swanson:
r have reviewed your concept plan to develop either a 1750 SF single story professional
office building or a 1400 SF single story medilcal building on the subject parcel.
I would strongly advise you notto do either. In general, the northwest suburban market
and in particular the. Mt.Prospect area has a large vacancy factor, and had very little net
absorption in 2007. The prospects are no better for 2008.
Specifically, your site is too small to be economically feasible, and its location, although
it is within walking distance to the train, is in a secondary (atbest) location. It would be
very difficult to market effectively.
In conclusion, because of the high cost of construction and the reasons stated above, I
would recommend you not develop any commercial on this parcel.
Sincerely,
CB RICHARD ELLIS
Mark Smith
Office Leasing Specialist
CBRE
".
Fourth Quarter 2007
METRO CHICAGO
Suburban Office Market
4,363,6Q~
1,866,713
2,Q76,329-1'.
420,561
!66,651
643,950
210,705
11 ,996
5,230,254
2,510,663
._.,_ ._~.~!.?8~,~3~_
.. . .n~~2,5~7.
16.7%
14.8%
19.8%
...... . ..~.. _.
14.0%
\
Page 1 of2
Paul Swanson and Associates
From: "RE/MAX Suburban Mt Prospect Office" <mtprospectoffice@resub.com>
To: <psa401@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Monday, March 17,20085:26 PM
Subject: Townhome Development
March 17, 2008
Paul Swanson Assoc Inc
401 E Prospect Ave
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mr. Swanson,
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review your plans
and drawings for the three town homes proposed for the corner of
Prospect Ave, Elmhurst Ave and Busse Ave. Based on my 35 years of
experience and expertise as a real estate broker, first with my own real
estate company, National Sunrise Realty in Arlington Heights, and then
since November of 2002 as a broker/associate with RE/MAX Suburban at
330 E Northwest Highway in Mount Prospect, I believe this is a first class
project worth doing, that would fit perfectly into the vibrant new look
Mount Prospect has started to create in the last several years.
I have focused my marketing and branding in Mount Prospect as
"Mr. Mt. Prospect" from the beginning of my career; and have listed and
sold over 600 properties in Mount Prospect alone. When I reviewed what
you intended to build, where you intended to build it and the price point
at which you intended to be ($450-000-$500,000), I am genuinely
excited and certain about your prospects for success, regardless of the
general market conditions. I would be likewise excited about
representing you as the broker. I was involved in selling one of the town
homes just east of "Mrs. P & Me" a fe"'7 years ago. Those all sold for
$515,000-$570,000 and yours are son1ewhat similar.
The real estate adage of the three most important things in
making real estate valuable is true in your project. That is location,
location, location. Walking distance to town, train, shops, and stores is
_~.:11_L.:__l___ -'__.-1.&.._1__1______...... T..Ll_~__l_ _ _____'1.' .."
Page 2 of2
of high quality town homes fits perfectly with the overwhelming
residential nature of the neighborhood. The idea of another small
business building in that location leaves me cold. In my opinion, the
aesthetics of the town home developrnent enhance the look of Prospect
Ave which I can't imagine being improved by a small commercial
building.
My best wishes for your success. I hope you get approval because
it will be a big plus for Mount Prospect's image as well
Sincerely,
Jim Regan
"Mr. Mt. Prospect"
--
"
let design
lenet crestani tallman
design group, He
January 16, 2008
Mr. Paul Swanson
401 E. Prospect Avenue
Suite 201
Mt. Prospect, IL. 60056
RE: 309 - 317 Prospect fiscal impact analysis
Dear Mr. Swanson:
Per your request, attached please find the revised fiscal impact analysis for the
proposed 309 - 317 Prospect Avenue townhome development. As you will note my
analysis indicates a positive fiscal benefit to schools districts 214 and 57 and no
impact on the Village of Mt. Prospect. The report also considers the impact of an
office development on the subject property. As you will note, the townhomes provide
a significantly greater benefit, especially to the school districts, than does the office
development.
If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please let me know.
Sincerely,
LENET, CREST ANI, TALLMAN DESIGN
&;//( It 4)
By:
Steve Lenet, AICP/ ASLA
President
401 NC>1"th Franklin Street, Suite 5S · Chicago, Illinois · 60(i1O
.112-829-0080. 312-4C>4-9415 Fax. www.Jctdg.COlTl
Landscapc :\rchitccturc . Sitc Planning · Economic Dcyc!opmcnt · Urban Dcsign · Comprehcnsivc
--
"
let design
lenct crcstani tallman
design group, He
Fiscal Impact Analysis & Comparison of Development Alternatives
for 309 -317 Prospect Avenue, Mount Prospect, Illinois
The following study is an analysis of the general fiscal impact of the proposed 309-
317 Prospect Avenue on the various taxing bodies that provide services to the subject
property. The subject property is located at the intersection of Prospect Avenue and
Elmhurst Avenue, north of Busse Avenue The current proposal calls for the
development of approximately of three townhomes. Each of the townhomes will
approximately 2,400 square feet including the attached two car garage(s). Projected
sales prices for each of the units is $465.000.00. This results in a total fair market
value for the project of $1 ,395,000.00.
It is important to note that the primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate the
relationship between revenues and expenses that is attributable to the proposed
development. All projected revenues and expenses are expressed in current dollars
and are predicated on 2006 tax rates. Over time, the value of this development will
rise, tax rates may fluctuate, and the cost of providing services will probably increase.
This study makes no attempt to speculate on any of these variables, but rather
provides a view of current conditions. Based upon our experience, we believe that in
general the relationship expressed in this study between revenues and expenditures
will remain relatively constant. In all likelihood the three townhomes will be sold
within a twelve month period, however, for the purposes of this study it is assumed
that the development is fully occupied. This scenario is chosen since tax rates,
expenditures and school funding will undoubtedly change. Since the purpose of this
study is to explore the relationship between revenues and expenses this is a rational
methodology .
Because this study must of necessity rely upon 2006 property tax rates as well as
current Village of Mount Prospect budget figures, and School District 57 and School
District 214 costs to educate students, this study will, as noted earlier, hypothesize
that the development is fully built and occupied. While the fair market value of
$1,395,000.00 is a reasonable estimate, it has been our experience that the Cook
County Assessor rarely uses the fair market value as projected. Therefore for the
purposes of this study we have reduced the fair market value by ten percent to
$1,255,500.00. Residential units as in this subject development are assessed at 16%
of fair market value in Cook County. This results in an assessed fair market value of
$200,880.00. The current state equalizer for Cook County is 2.7076; as applied to the
subject property this results in an equalized fair market value of $543,900.00. 1 Table
1, on the following page indicates the projected property tax revenues to the various
taxing bodies serving the subject development.
I All numbers are rounded to nearest whole five dollars
401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S · Chicago, Illinois · (}061O
312-829-0080. 312-464-9415 1<ax. ww\v.lctdg.com.
J .andscape :\rchitecture · Site Planning · Economic Deyc]opment · Urban Design · Comprehensive
--
"
lctdesign
lenet crestani tal1man
design group, lIe
TAXING DISTRICT TAX RATE EST. REAL ESTATE TAX*
VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT 0.846 $4,600
SCHOOL DIST. #57 2.694 $14,650
COOK COUNTY HEALTH FACILITY 0.103 $560
Mt. PROPECT SPEC. SER. AREA 5 0.118 $641
HARPER COLLEGE DIS1. 512 0.288 $1,565
HIGH SCHOOL DIST. 214 1.823 $9,915
WATER RECLAMATION DIS1. 0.284 $1,545
ELK GROVE GEN. ASSISTANCE 0.009 $50
ELK GROVE TWP.ROAD & BRIDGE 0.009 $50
TOWN OF ELK GROVE 0.044 $240
MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT 0.474 $2,580
M1. PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND. 0.482 $2,630
CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS 0 $0
SUBURBAN T.B. SANITARIUM 0.005 $30
FOREST PRESERVE DIST. 0.057 $310
COUNTY OF COOK 0.287 $1,560
COOK COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY 0.130 $710
N.W. MOSQUITO ABATEMENT 0.009 $50
I TOTAL
7.6421
$41,565
I
"ROUNDED TO NEAREST WHOLE FIVE DOLLARS
401 North Franklin Strcet, Suite 5S " Chicago, lllinois " 60610
312-829-0080" .)12-464-9415 Fax" ww\v.lctdg.com
1 .,n(1..,rC1t"\(. .\ lThitertlTl'e " Site Phnninp' " Econolnic Dcye]ontncnt " Urban DcsiQ'n " C0111prchcnsiyc
--
",
lctdesigll
lenet ercstani tallman
design group, He
VILLAGE OF MT. PROPSECT FINANCIAL IMP ACT ANA YL YSIS:
For purposes of this analysis expenses are estimated using a proportionality ratio
method. This methodology assumes that the Village of Mt. Prospect expends an
identical sum to provide services, such as police patrols, public works and
administrative services throughout the village regardless of the land use the streets
serve. The Village of Mt. Prospect Comprehensive Plan indicates a current
population of 56,265 resident to whom the village provides services. The subject
development is expected to generate a total population of seven residents represents
approximately 0.00012% of Village population. The Village ofMt. Prospect
operating budget for 2006 was approximately 48.6 million dollars. Proportionally,
this would represent an annual expenditure of $5,800.00 to provide services to the
three proposed townhomes. Real estate tax revenues to the Village ofMt. Prospect
from the project are estimated at $4,600.00. Revenues from other sources including
local sales tax rebates from the state, photo-processing sales tax, income tax
redistribution, motor fuel tax, fines and penalties, franchise fees, 911 line charge,
utility tax revenue, and interest revenue have historically averaged $200.00 per
resident, or approximately $1,400.00.
401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S · Chicago, Illinois · 60610
.)12-829-0080. 312-464-9415 Fax. www.lctdg.com
Landscane Architecture · Site Planninl! · l-:conomic Deyclonmcnt · Urban Dcsien · Comnfchcnsivc
~~
..
lctdesign
Icnet crcstani tallman
design group, lie
SCHOOL(S) FINANCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
In most Cook County suburbs, the local school districts will account for 50 to 75% of
the real estate tax bill. In the current analysis, School District 57 and High School
District 214 account for 59% of the total real estate tax levy.
Table 1 below entitled "Adults & School Ae:ed Children Per Household"
utilizes demographic data complied by the Illinois School Consulting
Service of Naperville, Illinois. Currently it is anticipated that the three
townhomes will feature two bedrooms and an office and/or flex space, we
have calculated the projected population using both two and three bedroom
projections.
Annual Fiscal Impact to Hie:h School District #214
The proposed development is projected to enroll no high school students. Property
tax revenues are estimated at $9,915.00 annually.
Annual Fiscal Impact to Elementary School District #57
The proposed development is projected to enroll no more than one student. Revenues
from real estate taxes are estimated to be $14,650.00 annually.
TABLE 1
u s c 00 ~~e I ren er ouse 0
Type of Unit Elementary Grades High School Total Population
k- 8// Ages 5-13 Grades 9-12
Alternate One 0136 x 3 0.038 x 3 1.990 x 3
(3)2 bedroom townhomes o elementary school o high school 6 adults
Students students *
Alternate Two 0.292 x 3 0.059 x 3 2.392 x 3
(3) 3 Bedroom townhomes 1 elementary school o high school 7 children & adults
students student
Ad It & S h I A d Ch Old
P H
h Id
Source: Illinois School Consulting Service, Naperville, Illinois. * All projections rounded up to nearest whole number.
401 North hanklin Street, Suite 5S · Chicago, lllinois · 60610
.) 12-829-0080 · 312-464-9415 Fax · w\Vw.lctdg.com
J ,andscane j\1-chitccturc · Sitc Planning. Economic Dcyclopmc11t · Urban Dcsign · Comprchcnsive
d~
..
let design
lenet crestani tallman
design group, lle
AL TERNA TIVE DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS:
The Village planning staff has raised the question as to whether offices might be a
more appropriate use for the subject site. A preliminary site plan, appended to this
report, indicates a maximum gross leasable area (GLA) of 1,750 square feet. The
GLA is a function of the number of parking spaces the site can support and the
recognition that market conditions will not support the costs associated with under
ground parking or an elevator.
Office rentals in the Village of Mount Prospect for similar offices are averaging
$15.00 per square foot. Older offices, such as in those to the east on Prospect Ave.,
are averaging $10.00 per square foot. Therefore, we believe an annual rent of$15.00
per square foot is reasonable. This would result in a capitalized fair market values of
$250.00 per square foot. This results in a fair market value for the offices of
$250,000.00.
In Cook County office space is assessed at 40% of fair market value. While the fair
market value of $250,000.00 is a reasonable estimate, as with the residential
assessment it has been our experience that the Cook County Assessor rarely uses the
fair market value as projected. Therefore for the purposes of this study we have
reduced the fair market value by ten percent to $225,000.00. The current state
equalizer for Cook County is 2.7076; as applied to the subject property this results in
an equalized fair market value of $543,900.00. Table 2, on the following page
indicates the projected property tax revenues to the various taxing bodies serving the
subject development. Therefore, the equalized assessed valuation (EA V) for offices
would be $243,685.00.
401 North r;ranklin Street, Suite 5S · Chicago, Illinois · 60610
312-829-0080 · 312-464-9415 Fax · www.lctdg.com
J ,andscapc ;\rchitccturc · Site Plan nine: · Economic Dcyc!opmcnt · Urban Dcsil!l1 · Comnfchensiye
~D
..
let desig~n
lenet crestani tallman
design group, lie
TAXING DISTRICT TAX RATE EST. REAL ESTATE TAX.
VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT 0.846 $2,060
SCHOOL DIST. #57 2.694 $6,560
COOK COUNTY HEALTH FACILITY 0.103 $250
Mt. PROPECT SPEC. SER. AREA 5 0.118 $290
HARPER COLLEGE DIST. 512 0.288 $700
HIGH SCHOOL DIST. 214 1.823 $4,440
WATER RECLAMATION DIST. 0.284 $690
ELK GROVE GEN. ASSISTANCE 0.009 $20
ELK GROVE TWP.ROAD & BRIDGE 0.009 $50
TOWN OF ELK GROVE 0.044 $110
MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT 0.474 $547
MT. PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND. 0.482 $1,175
CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS 0 $0
SUBURBAN T.B. SANITARIUM 0.005 $15
FOREST PRESERVE DIST. 0.057 $140
COUNTY OF COOK 0.287 $700
COOK COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY 0.130 $315
N.W. MOSQUITO ABATEMENT 0.009 $20
PROJECT OFFICE PROPERTY TAXES
TOTAL 7.642 I $18,615
"ROUNDED TO NEAREST WHOLE $5.00 I l
CONCLUSION:
The proposed three townhomes will have a positive fiscal benefit to school districts
214 and 57 and will be a break even proposition for the Village of Mount Prospect.
Furthermore the townhomes have a greater financial benefit to the school districts
than the projected office development. In fact the fair market value of the office
development would have to be more than one hundred percent greater than projected
to have the same benefits.
401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S · Chicago, Illinois · 60610
312-829-0080. 312-464--9415 Fax. www.lctdg.com
] ,andscane ;\rchitecture · Site PlanninQ · Economic DenJopmcnt . Urban Design · CotTlprehensivc
c~~~
401 n. franklin street
suite !)S
chicago, il 60()1O
3,12.829.0080
www.leidg.com
lenct crcstani talJn1un
design group, lIe
L"lIdt;l~av~ Arthit~tlllrl' . Site Plauning . EtcOlllllllie Development . Urban Design . CUlJljJreheu~ive Pl..ll\l1il1~
Steven M. Lenet, AICP/ASLA
Education:
. Bachelor of Science, Bradley University, Environmental Studies, 1968
. Master of Arts, Loyola University, Urban Studies, 1972
. Certificate of Completion, Community Shelter Planning University of Tennessee, Graduate School of
Planning, November 1969
. Various courses in landscape architecture and landscape design at:
· University of California, Berkeley, CA.
. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
. Harvard University, Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, MA.
Professional Experience:
. Principal, Lenet Crestani Tallman Land Design, LLC
Landscape Architects & Planners
401 N. Franklin Street Suite 5 South
Chicago, Illinois 60647
(312)829-0080
stevel@lctdg.com
June 2005, to present
. Principal, Linden/Lenet Land Design, Ltd.
Landscape Architects & Planners
Chicago, Illinois
January 1996 - June 2005
. Principal, Lenet Design Group
Landscape Architects & Planners
Chicago, Illinois
July, 1984 - January 1996
. Principal, Leavitt, Matheson & Lenet
Architects, Landscape Architects & Planners
Chicago, Illinois
December 1977 - July 1984
. Planning & Zoning Administrator, Village Of Palatine
Palatine, Illinois
October 1974 - December 1977
. Planner II, City Of Chicago
Dept. of Development & Planning
Chicago, Illinois
November 1969 - October 1974
· Assistant Planner, Scruggs & Hammond Inc.
Landscape Architects & Planners
East Peoria, Illinois
June 1967 - November 1969
I t 1
.c neS15!11
'-.!
S. Lenet 2
Selected Clients & Projects:
Governmental
. Consulting Planner, Cook County, Illinois
Prepared comprehensive amendment to Cook County Zoning Ordinance; Prepared Comprehensive Plan for
unincorporated Cook County, the second largest county in the United States; introduced concept of
"environmental review and environmentally sensitive" to County Plan.
. Consulting Planner Peotone, Illinois
Prepared preliminary studies for Master Plan and major amendments to the Village's Zoning Ordinance.
Attended all Plan Commission meetings and made recommendations on planning and zoning proposals.
. Consulting Planner McCook, Illinois
Prepared first comprehensive plan and new zoning ordinance for the village
. Consulting Planner, Stone Park, Illinois
Prepared first comprehensive plan and new zoning ordinance for the village with the largest Hispanic
population in Illinois.
. Consulting Landscape Architect, Kildeer, Illinois
Retained to review all landscape design proposal and to advise Village Board on planning and landscape
design issues.
. Consulting Planner, Village Of South Barrington, Illinois
Prepared preliminary studies for Master Plan and major amendments to the Village's Zoning Ordinance.
Attended all Plan Commission meetings and made recommendations on planning and zoning proposals.
Prepared Open Space Plan adopted by Village Board.
. Consulting Planner, Village Of Lemont, Illinois
Prepared revised Master Plan and major amendments to the Village's Zoning Ordinance.
. Consulting Planner, Village Of Oak Park, Illinois
Prepared major revisions to Village's Zoning Ordinance to help revitalize historic commercial districts
· Consulting Planner, Village Of Palatine, Illinois
Prepared revised Master Plan and major amendments to the Village's Zoning Ordinance.
· Consulting Planner, Village Of Streamwood, Illinois
Prepared revised Comprehensive Plan and completely rewrote Village Zoning Ordinance; conducted training
sessions for boards, commissions and building dept. personnel on zoning and code enforcement.
. Consulting Landscape Architect, Village Of Glendale Heights, Illinois
Designed parks and playgrounds, supervised improvements by Village staff and reviewed landscape design
proposals.
· Consulting Planner, Village Of Hainesville, Illinois
Provided site plan review services and helped prepare major revisions to the Village's Zoning Code.
. Consulting Planner & Landscape Architect, Village Of Addison, Illinois
Prepared sub-area detailed plans for redevelopment of "Tax Increment Financing Districts. Aided Village in
certifying TIF district. Prepared urban beautification plans for Lake Street corridor and primary entrance to
the Village Hall, and landscape beautification plan for Addison Library.
. Consulting Planner, Village Of Hodgkins, Illinois
Prepared major revisions to the Village's Comprehensive Plan.
. Land Planning and Landscape Architecture: United Land Development, Kildeer, Illinois
Kemper Lakes Golf Club and Residences
Prepared site plans and landscape plans for 300 acre golf course community.
S. Lenet 3
. Gallagher & Henry, Countryside, Illinois
"SpringCreek", Orland Park, Illinois
Prepared site plans and supporting materials for the development of a 1,500 acre new town, including
detailed designs and design criteria for a 60-acre "town center" containing neighborhood shopping, offices,
governmental offices, specialty residential and a public square, as well as pedestrian and bike paths systems as
connectors to the balance of the community.
. Biffman Shaffer, Anderson, Inc., Chicago, Illinois
"Covington Corporate Center Office Research Park", Bloomingdale, Illinois
Prepared site and landscape plans for 250 acre office research center.
. Bigelow Homes, Palatine, Illinois
A Tree House in the Park, Round Lake, Illinois. Prepared site and landscape plans for 220 unit award
winning townhouse development.
Professional Affiliations:
. American Planning Association
. American Institute of Certified Planners
. American Society of Landscape Architects
. Urban Land Institute
· American Forestry Association
. Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners
w
PROSPECT
. . ., ~...c,. _' : _ _ , _~ ._. _. .'._,0.__" _
". . .~ .-..... ,"-.,.".. ",
AVENUE
:..',..;j;,.....'.:. ;~-:. ;-.;.;_:::'.::.
. ':~.::::\ ;.~'~[::';~f..',,~<:~;/..:~. :...j~'1.
WAltR VAl.~
I.; ,
II<lN PIPE AT _tV_
[{
~
-....
I
I
I
, . J.
.., ,,--
t-~~r.' '!>o..,
a:~~~" Or:.~6"!>
,()~ ;",C!J'O
().
\
~
IX)
&0
IX)
I
I
I
~
~
"~~
~~~~ I
,0-
6
~~# I
.~ #'~
0.... \
6' 4-..:J..
<..6- 0-'-;
~' tS"
.,.. ""..". \
;<1>..... -'- 0-<1'
'''''';~-
~
,,0 \.
~
\
\
\
~
,,0 \)
~
\
SURVEY
15 0 7.5 IS JO
( nulZl' )
1 lach ..- 16 It.
LOTS 40, 41 AND 42 IN H. ROY BERRY CO,'S COLONIAL MANOR, BEING A
SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 AND PART OF
THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, ALL IN TOWNSfDP 41 NORm, RANGE 11
EAST OF THE TfDRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN cOoK COUNTY,ILLlNoIS.
l.oDdIcape PIIDIUIl
Shade Treea
A Ace, frellllDll "Autumn FlDtuy"
B Celd. occldOlltallo
C Qu=Ulbicolor
D UImUl'Triumph"
Omamental.
I MalIll-1ted Jew-er'
Pado Sluuha
A. Techny Arl>orvWe
Foundation Shnab.
Bb SprireI frobcUi
Ce Hydroo.ea Tudiva
Dc Arrowood Vibumum
3" ca1
3" caI.
3" cal.
.3" cat.
6' bJl.
4' het
30'130"
36"bet
36"bJl.
Jaeobslll,yu AIIoclates LaD~pe Arc:b1teeu
1527 NINth SlDdbur. Terrace. ChIco.., D1illOi. 60610
Vi- :ptZ07P~C T
AVE::
~.?
.t$-
-'w
.po-
~
~
~.t
. .ct-
.JY]~
~
Ill:: I'? I
LAND;?CA\J~ PLAN
~~" I ~jI;.V
1\/e/o,
~
-j
-\
f
\
\
i
tJ
I
"
"
~~
i{
r
p~
I j ~'!
Ii 3~
ft1~
II .
J ,I
I {
I ';
!
-'--'If-
:=!
::.
t
~:
I
~
!
~
....
z
\\\
1
-1
_II
~
L
Cl ,...
-~
~
~?
::>
~
~~
~
~
t{. ~
C
"2
''If-:
\
.'fl'....
'1, !
ii\:\'.
2:~
, ~~
~~'
'!I';
I
~
.. ;,G'"j;!a'i.'
, ,
I
~
:Ji
~
Gi)
?':~
~~
~
t\J
~;'~
, ,rj
)
-
~
_1\
-_ I
\
~~,
;:; <f,.l')~
",,'v~V\
~}>. ..
~
74
-$>.
\~
s;:-
.'Y
~..
it.
ill
~
b
~
~
()
~
3
r~1
r
'i
j. .
~
l{'\
~'
/:,
-
.-
.
I
-' ',. . ,."" ,
" "", : ,~" ,:; l:~';~,;:',;,!:i" :' ',:~", "
" , -". '" , " I#.""',
", "" " , " " j' ~ IF "
o . ',' I ,".', , I.," "'," ':I,' ',;,1<, \1
'" · , " . 'Iii." 'I ' , " . ,
" .:.. " , ""'r::," " .. , , T I
' "Cf-. "." " .. _, :"" ~'
". - r " ,.", """ """-,, -'
'let- ' """"F ' , ,,~' ~ _~
' " €J L, ' " ,',"" " ',,"f;;"',
' . '" !,t-W"'e,,"* "'",, __
(~ltIY IjJO " ",' '" ':L,', ~'~'i'iili',:i";Y/......
".'P.l" '" ' ~it?.. ... """'"!,,~,, ~
::~1 '~'I" ".:';J.. "g{ ,,', , :. ~-', >, "- ,'':;",'" ,-" .' ~
-3 ' . .' ....:... 'r'T '. .',' , ; . . . ..,.....,,~,. .... , .
' , '", '" " . , , , ", , ,,,.,'
I,' , ,,1 " n" ~'''I' "" "'", ," ", _
' "," ", ';':'~"~" ~/":'Il,'."'" '.,,: _
'l """, , d" , ' ,tJ L~ " ''''."", "", , "
\ (f r~ 'I ~ -',' .'.".','" ',," ":~~~, WlU~t:'~::~.j~; _ ,
~ '," , ,': 0 ~Wl1" ,k.... " (;;I .: ~f11~'::, . ~
" ,,' '" ,", " ' ,,;. ", ' .. ,., , " "', ' ~
I,,' , '. , "'" , '." "'" "!" ,
" ,', " , ,}, ,', ,~-., ".":' ;,.." , ,',
" ,,'/- -,- ," .', i" '. ,.', ,," '" """ ",' ,'.,:' ~:' ':' ~t ' ...
:. .1,. . . . '''I.,'' ,,,, '" ~,/.J." ,'" ,".; ...._'_ ..'
' I ",', ' '"" (' , " t.J t-. '., 'v.:'~'v/
. - '-"" 0 "'~r' ~ "~
,,', .~ ," I' " ,I I
--
r
I ; ", "
I-~' "'..
'1
~
I
'. . '. .
',to"
. . .' . , .
'.' . '.
.' "
. . .'.
.. '-, " .
r .
=~
_I
~
\.
-~
-1::\
~
'....'
. .
, .
',.;"
'. "
ctl~'.
'lO~
"~
.,
,',
, .. '
,~e
.~
.,........
'"
, ;
,I
. ~...
"
'1:,
,.
, ~ ,\
,',.;'
,.
. .."
J~
~rr .~.
.... ,
"
~ "
l\i.
D"
~.,'
, ~ : '
~", ~'l"
,.
. . \
. :,' .., . . -:,'- ~ ': -, .. , ,
, .'
....~-.r
,,"-,~,'
'"
"
~
z
.(
....1.
C,:t;.. ='0'
N"-'
~~, i,l,
~,
u.. ":"";
I
.'
ul
t
?
,..
..Q..
~,
1
...\
~-
~)
8#~
'\~ !.
, ~ !'
~"
.~
,
, ,
I
'II. '
~
4
"
I
I ' ..l.f)
! ~~
1 if
I ~~
~1
t*~
I
I 'j
J
!
;
i
.. J
~ f
\.
\
!
, '.''.J.;.
'~
,~
f'
. ,...."
, :i
't'
~
l
~
I
j
I :
\
j '\
j
\ ,!.
I
"
i
I
,
\
j
'A
"l
~
~.
~
.::Z i.... ...
___~-..-'-L....
t
!
~
I-
:z
\\\
1
~
~
~
..J
~
J
\I
~~
~
"'it'
/' ::
-~
:iI
~
/
t
,
I
~f
\7= :;;). .
~ %:.
.~~ .
~'
~~..
"
z;.
......
~
i:: ~
<:)J =
-_I
. "" t; .JI
~~
(.\" ,,'
~.i:
.\\\
'1/0 "', $&.. .J"
. ~. .~ d
it r
,'/
. ""~",,.. ~
...... ...,,"...,' "''''(2 L1 .
. --'''''''I~'''''' '''''':'It..~tQ..
1I~
s.
;
1:
r'.
'~"I
. D'~'
. . :"-:-';111
I "
0" ".':
'i I
-:: ::'od ,. 'j'
0.... ,
......,. .,' j
. .,
.1'
" ","
. ., . '".. ~ .
~ . :~ii:~
. .~~ ~.. j, ~ :f ~ : J . ,~
.!t ..1 l'~ ~cr' 11"
P,' 'f" '.l ,:l ~.q -r.:'t-' ' ;
~ .' ~l . ~ .1J~
. I, , I I"
:,.....
't ~~"
, . .
J'~
--t' r- ~
~2
y~
() 11-\ ~
-=r?~
2o~
~L~
~J)&
2
\--
-Z
2ri
:). .~
\Clr
i
, .
"
" . ,.
..,..... ,
. .
.' ,
1,_. I
" ,
~
I
<C
w
C)
~
<C
C)
" . ., :':1, ':.' <., " :):. 'l'~:~.. :" .,;..:.. .
.' .
J,.. 1
,;:;} ~.~:~. ::f.>.:~)~': ,;' ;' ";"'(.
I,. , ,~ "
.
" ,
.... '
~ " .
i
. , ' \
,J("" \
'1:,' '\
' "
f. "I
" ,
,I 7
1,_ , ,~ "
.. ,
~ '"
~
~\
~
m
'W
C)
~\
<C
C)
2:"r-
l.ll~
<))
b'
PI
~
~
~N.
7-
--
7-
DCI
o
H
.....
I
m
w
C)
~.
<C
C)
.". .:><~::' :~r'''0~, : .: ;. ..:, ..
. ".' ",: .,'. "
I,.. ''', "
.' .
.'~ '
'.j
\
. . i
~It:(' I
,I
. \
I.'
, .'\
',1>\
~
I
o
W
'C)
~
<C
C)
.", .:~"/ ::,:::' :~r :::;,)~< ,: ;-..". ..
. ."/,.' ,... ,,'. "
. . ' .,', .. ,~;' ..: '.: .". . .
I.>. ," ,
'. .
. ,."
, ,
~~
, " II
. . ',':1'-
, , t
",:.'~ t!~
'" ~:'. Z!?
I '
'" , ; " " ,~.
, . ~
: ' ~~.
.......~ T
"~
, ' I
. , .
",'~.,':'
'ill " ,
~' .
.. I
. ,
, ~..
, ":;:.: ,",
" '
, '",', '. I
. '~
,,2:
,';z,,'
'0 .
,N "
"!
uL
>..
<,
'~: -
l:,' i '
~", ,,~.L'-e"
i
. '''.
/. "
i.
, "
, I
.~
'.' ,
I' "
". ;' ~~~~"b -r (~. ,':
. . ",';'~, .,~., ,:;'..' ,".
, '.: i
, ,
(l1~'-'1 :'.~.,..:
. , . ,t-J , ~ '.
,'. i"~'t' "^,
' t,' . " :."'.' ~', " " '" .,'
I,. ".
~' "'I" . ,
,I . .
i '
.~! .
.~. ' ~
, . ',,' .
-.r._
, '1'~
~...g
'N
I "
I
. , .
I '.".
'1~':; i">:~>?..
'.~.'..~......:/...
'.,
~':Z',
, ( ,
. I , .
, .
' ,
\
. .~, I
'. '. '., '. ;,;.... ..;:) .;. .... .
,," '. . )C....l ',.' "'..".
......,,:';.... .........;......., . ....... . .
~,o , "
.,( '. .:. " . ',. ',' , , ' ,
'>, ," , ""
'. ,
. . '. .
. . ..,.
.,'. ,t,
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 309-317 WEST PROSPECT AVENUE,
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, Paul Swanson Associates ("Petitioner"), has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit
to allow dwelling units on the ground floor of a three unit rowhome development and Variations with
respect to property located at 309-317 West Prospect Avenue ("Property") and legally described on
the attached Exhibit "A"; and
Property Index Numbers: 08-11-205-010,08-11-205-011,08-11-205-012; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to construct a three (3) unit rowhome with
dwelling units on the ground floor; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks Variations to allow the following setbacks and building height: 13'
front yard (Prospect Avenue), a 25' rear yard setback (Busse Avenue) and 31.25 building height
(midpoint) as shown on the Petitioner's site plan and elevations dated November 8,2007.
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit and Variations
being the subject of Case No. 38-07 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 27th day of March, 2008, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 10th day of October, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendation
to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect in support of the request
being the subject of PZ-38-07; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given
consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the requests meet the standards of
the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit to allow construction of a
three (3) unit rowhome with dwelling units on the ground floor and Variations would be in the best
interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE
OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: Approval of the Conditional Use permit is subject to compliance with the following
conditions:
A. Consolidation of the three separate lots as shown on Exhibit "A"
B. Right-of-way squared off at the intersection of Busse Avenue and Elmhurst Avenue.
Removal of curved sidewalk and new sidewalk installed along Busse Avenue to the
corner;
c
Page 2/2
PZ-31-06
Page 2/2
PZ-38-07, 309-317 West Prospect Avenue
C. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan and landscape plan
prepared by Paul Swanson Associates, dated November 8, 2007;
D. Development of the units in general conformance with the floor plans prepared by Paul
Swanson Associates, dated November 8, 2007 but revised so the east elevation
includes architectural interest;
E. Prior to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy, the Petitioner must submit homeowner's
association documents for staff to review and approve that include text stating on-street
over night parking is prohibited;
F. The Petitioner shall construct all units according to all Village Codes and regulations,
including, but not limited to: the installation of automatic fire sprinklers.
SECTION THREE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do
hereby grant approval of a Conditional Use permit and Variations as provided in Section 14.203.F.7
and Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code, for a three (3) unit rowhome development with
dwellings on the ground floor, all as shown on the Site Plan dated November 8, 2007 a copy of
which is attached and made a part this ordinance.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of
this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval
and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H :\CLKO\files\WI N\ORDI NANC\C USEV AR-309weslprospeclpz38-07may2008.doc
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
Mount Prospect
MEMORANDUM
~
TO:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
'B~. ~~
5/",108
FROM:
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FOR:
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
DATE:
APRIL 25, 2008
SUBJECT:
PZ-37-07 - PHASE 1 OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
(HEIMBAUGH CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT)
The petItIOner, Heimbaugh Capital Development, is seeking approval for a Conditional Use for a
Planned Unit Development and a Building Height Variation for Phase 1 of the Mount Prospect Town
Center, for the property commonly referred to as "the small triangle" and/or sub-area # 1.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday,
March 27, 2008, and by a vote of 3-1, with two members absent, recommended approval of a
Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development and a Building Height Variation for Phase 1 of the
Mount Prospect Town Center. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and
Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their May 6, 2008 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this
matter.
~\tll. ~,
William J. Cooney, Jr., A P
H\PLANIPhmnlllg & Zoning COMM\P&Z 200H\MEJ Mcmo\PZ.37-07 Downtown Triangle Entertainment Dlstricl.doc
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CASE NO. PZ-37-07
Hearing Date: March 27, 2008
PROPERTY ADDRESSES:
6-34 W. Busse Avenue,
12-20 W. Northwest Highway
Busse Avenue right of way between Main Street and Wille Street
and the easternmost 10' of the Wille Street right of way adjacent
to the subject property
PETITIONER:
Homebrook Prospect LLC
c/o Heimbaugh Capital Development Corporation
PUBLICATION DATE:
March 12, 2008
PIN NUMBERS:
08-12-102-057/058/030/059/060/061/062
08-12-107 -022 / 003/ 020 / 004 / 006 / 007
REQUEST:
Conditional Use (Planned Unit Development/Mixed Use Commercial
and Residential)
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Richard Rogers, Chair
Leo Floros
Marlys Haaland
Keith Youngquist
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Joseph Donnelly
Ronald Roberts
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development
Brian Simmons, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
INTERESTED PARTIES:
John Heimbaugh, Mike Fitzgerald, Michael Worthman, Jonean Ford,
Wilma Galassine, Carol Tortorello, Robert Gniech, Carl Johnson, James
Grady, Joanna Challacombe
Chairman Richard Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. After roll call, Chairman Rogers stated that
they have the minimum amount of Planning and Zoning Commission Members for a quorum. In order for a case
to receive a positive recommendation, a unanimous vote must occur. The voting for the minutes from the January
24, 2008 meeting were held over until the next meeting since only two members were present from that meeting.
After hearing two previous cases, Chairman Rogers introduced case number PZ-37-07, a request for a Conditional
Use (Planned Unit DevelopmentlMixed Use Commercial and Residential) approval at 6-34 W. Busse Ave., 12-20
W. Northwest Hwy., and the easternmost 10' of Wille Street right of way adjacent to the property, at 8:14 p.m.
William Cooney, Director of Community Development, stated that the request was for a Planned Unit
Development on the property known as the "Small Triangle" or "Sub Area I." He showed some pictures of the
area. He said that this was one of five sub areas highlighted by the AD HOC Committee in 2004 when they
reviewed potential re-development options in the downtown area.
Mr. Cooney gave a brief history of downtown re-development for the Village. Mr. Cooney also provided an
analysis of current conditions. He said the attributes for the Small Triangle included its historical significance,
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-37-07
Page 2
existing businesses, and affordable rents. The challenges that Mr. Cooney presented were its minimal private
investment, functional structural obsolescence, stagnant property values, and lack of parking.
Mr. Cooney stated recent Village actions for the area. These actions included: pursued an extension of Tax
Increment Funding (TIF) through 2021, the Mayor and Staff held individual meetings with business and property
owners in Sub Area 1, and pursued acquisition of remaining properties. Mr. Cooney said that the developer has
also pursued remaining properties as well. He also mentioned that the Village has entered negotiations with the
Heimbaugh Capital Development Corporation (HCDC).
Mr. Cooney said that HCDC would be presenting their development concept and asked the public to voice their
opinions as well.
Chairman Rogers restated that the proposal is for a Conditional Use (Planned Unit Development), he said because
it is a Planned Unit Development, certain density requirements can be within ranges and other items could be
discussed.
Mr. Cooney stated that the actual project meets almost all codes. He said that a portion of the western tower
exceeds the 80 foot height maximum. He stated that this was the architectural feature. He also said there are 107
parking spaces for commercial (public) parking. There is approximately 35,000 square feet of retail space and by
code, there would need to be 137 spaces. Mr. Cooney stated that there were provisions for off site parking in the
Village parking deck as well as the adjacent Metra lot on Northwest Hwy.
Chairman Rogers swore in John Heimbaugh, President of HCDC, 666 Dundee Rd, Northbrook, IL and Mike
Fitzgerald, OKW Architects, 600 W. Jackson, Chicago, IL. Mr. Heimbaugh explained the history of HCDC and
provided HCDC's credentials. He highlighted mixed use developments previously built by HCDC.
Mr. Fitzgerald gave a brief profile of OKW Architects and provided pictures of similar mixed use projects that
OKW has completed in Evanston, Wheaton, Palatine, and Mount Prospect (Founders Row).
Mr. Fitzgerald said the proposal includes a mixed use project of retail and residential along with a parking garage
to serve both uses. The East building (along Main St.) will include retail on the ground floor with residential units
above. The West and North buildings would be connected. The West building would have retail on the ground
floor with residential above. The North building will be the parking structure with residential units above. Mr.
Fitzgerald created a scale showing the project.
Mr. Fitzgerald discussed the floor plans for all three buildings including the plaza that is between the East and
West buildings. The retail would be along Main St. and extend throughout the plaza with the remaining retail
primarily running along Northwest Hwy. He also addressed residential access points throughout the buildings.
Mr. Fitzgerald stated that they have made some adjustments since the Committee of the Whole Meeting on March
11,2008. He said the East building would be shifted back 12 feet to allow more sidewalk space along Northwest
Hwy. He stated that the East building would be pushed off Main St. as well. The West building has been shifted
by 8 feet to allow more room on the sidewalk along Northwest Hwy. Mr. Fitzgerald said this also allowed for 9
parallel parking spaces along Northwest Hwy.
Mr. Fitzgerald said vehicular access to the site would be at two locations. The first would be on the West side off
of Wille St. and the second would be from the Village parking lot directly North of the site. Mr. Fitzgerald stated
that the parking garage would serve the commercial patrons as well as the residents. He said there are 107
parking spaces for commercial use; this is a ratio of 3.13 spaces per 1000 square feet of retail space. He stated
that this ratio does not include the public parking off site or the nine proposed spaces along Northwest Hwy.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-37-07
Page 3
Mr. Fitzgerald said there was another revision of the loading zone due to the concerns provided by neighbors. He
said the proposed loading zone would be North of the parking garage and would run parallel to the building as
opposed to running perpendicular as originally proposed. He said there would be a cut-in to the curb and the
loading zone would allow two lanes of traffic to pass by. He stated that trucks would no longer block any access
via the Village parking lot.
Mr. Fitzgerald said the garage access point on the North side of the structure does not align with the garage access
for the condo building to the North. He did mention that even though they do not align, they are directly across
from one another and it allows for drivers to make visual contact for entering and exiting their respective
structures.
Mr. Fitzgerald discussed other service elements for the buildings.
Chairman Rogers swore in Michael Worthman, of KLOA Inc. Mr. Worthman stated that he is a licensed
professional engineer with the State of Illinois. He said he was retained to complete a traffic study for the
proposed development.
Mr. Worthman stated that both access drives will lead commercial patrons and residents to their respective parking
areas. He said by having two access drives on two different roads provides the site with the maximum access
flexibility.
Mr. Worthman discussed concerns from the previous meeting regarding traffic in the Village parking lot directly
North of the site. He looked at the traffic volumes and stated they are low. Mr. Worthman stated that there are
between 40-45 vehicles within the peak hours. He said the parking lot has been safely designed for the
development.
Mr. Worthman said that neighbors suggested at the last meeting eliminating access to the site from the North. He
does not advocate this because it decreases the flexibility. He also believes that if access was eliminated that there
would still be a significant volume of traffic for the site utilizing the parking lot to the North. He said the access
drive would allow traffic to move quicker.
Mr. Worthman stated that there are currently no crosswalks on Main St. / Busse Ave. and Northwest Hwy. / Wille
St. Mr. Worthman said there is a proposed median/pedestrian refuge area. He will discuss this with the Illinois
Department of Transportation based on Staff's suggestions.
Mr. Fitzgerald discussed the commercial and residential parking plans. He said for the residential parking, there
are a total of 105 units that will be using 168 parking spaces (1.6 cars per unit).
Mr. Fitzgerald showed site sections, elevations, and discussed that the buildings would be made of brick with
limestone detailing.
Chairman Rogers said that parking in downtown Mount Prospect is a real problem. He believed that the parking
presented was not adequate. Chairman Rogers asked Mr. Fitzgerald the total number of bedrooms.
Mr. Fitzgerald did not have the total number of bedrooms, but he did discuss the sizes of the units.
Mr. Cooney said the parking for the four projects that have been approved in the downtown area have a parking
ratio ranging from 1.38 to 1.5. Mr. Cooney stated the only complaints that have been presented to him regarding
parking were by the residences to the North of the proposed site. He believed that the marketing people
misinformed residents that they could park their vehicles overnight in the Village's parking lot. Mr. Cooney said
he has not received any parking complaints from the condo owners at the Clocktower, Lofts, or Emerson building.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-37-07
Page 4
Chairman Rogers said he understands that the lot to the North of the proposed development is a thoroughfare
owned by the Village. Mr. Cooney confirmed that the Village owns the lot. He stated that there are easements
over the right access to the Residents development to the North and existing commercial to the South. Mr.
Cooney said that the lot was designated as guest parking for the visitors and for the businesses to the South. Mr.
Cooney advised that it was never intended for overnight parking.
Keith Youngquist asked what would stop residents from parking overnight in the proposed parking garage. Mr.
Cooney stated that the Village would own the public portion of the parking lot and there would be no parking
from 2 a.m. to 6 a.m.
Chairman Rogers confirmed that the proposed parking garage would have similar hours like the parking deck
North of Village Hall. Chairman Rogers said residents to the North of the proposed site could park in the public
portion of the proposed garage. Mr. Cooney said the Village enforces parking regulations in the downtown area
from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., in two hour zones. He said most of the downtown is unlimited parking from 6 p.m. to 2
a.m.
There was general discussion on whether the residential portion of the proposed parking garage would be heated.
Mr. Fitzgerald confirmed that it would be partially conditioned, but not a heated garage.
Leo Floros asked how many restaurants the Petitioners envision in this proposed development. Mr. Heimbaugh
said that there would be more than two. He said restaurant patrons would utilize the public parking. Mr.
Heimbaugh stated that a busy Saturday night would not be sufficient parking, he eXplained that is why the
adjacent parking would be used.
Mr. Youngquist led a discussion on another business in the downtown area. He believed downtown Mount
Prospect is not a walk-able community. He believed that people utilizing the adjacent lots and crossing at a
variety of places would create a dangerous situation.
Mr. Cooney stated that by closing Busse Ave. would create a pedestrian zone at Main St. and Wille St. He said if
this development becomes an entertainment zone with restaurants that will be busy beyond rush hour (6 p.m. - 7
p.m.). Mr. Cooney said traffic counts drop dramatically and it would be an easy walk across the street with a
halfway zone in the middle of the streets. Mr. Cooney stated that the proposed development is very accessible
from a pedestrian standpoint.
Chairman Rogers discussed the possibility of putting a crosswalk in the center of the walkway courtyard. Mr.
Cooney said that the chances would not be good; he does not believe the State would give this via mid-block.
There was general discussion that continued regarding walking and driving in downtown Mount Prospect.
Chairman Rogers stated that people have two or three cars. He said parking is a problem. He stated it is not fair
to add more units when parking is already a problem. Chairman Rogers said he would like to see more parking
spaces in the proposed garage.
There was general discussion regarding the signature elements of the building.
Mr. Floros said he loves the look of the site and welcomes this style to the downtown.
Marlys Haaland was very pleased with the proposed site.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-37-07
Page S
Chairman Rogers asked if the Petitioners had a chance to review comments from Staff regarding the additional
items that need compliance of this proposal was approved. The Petitioners agreed.
Mr. Worthman said 1.6 is a sufficient ratio as surveys and census data support this number.
Chairman Rogers swore in Jonean Ford, S W. Central, Mount Prospect, IL. Ms. Ford said the proposed garage
faces the North building and she is concerned with the metallic industrial look. She stated that half the units to
the North look out on the courtyard and face the South parking lot. She wanted to know if the Petitioners could
do anything to clean up the look.
Ms. Ford is also concerned with traffic. She said the Residences condo has to use the Village parking lot for
entering and exiting. She is concerned with additional parking spots for the proposed development.
Mr. Floros asked Ms. Ford if the traffic in the Village parking lot could go either direction. Ms. Ford said yes.
Chairman Rogers asked Ms. Ford how many trucks are currently in the loading area. Ms. Ford said that since the
Blues Bar was added, quite a few large trucks, one or two trucks at a time. She is concerned if more restaurants
come in, this would mean more trucks would be unloading.
Chairman Rogers swore in Wilma Galassine, 20 S. Main St., Mount Prospect, IL. Ms. Galassine said her condo
overlooks the triangle. She sees large semis for the Blues Bar and garbage trucks for pick-up. She said it is
crowded. Ms. Galassine questioned emergency access to the proposed site and what type of security would be in
place for the garage.
Chairman Rogers swore in Carol Tortorello, 223 S. Elmhurst Ave., Mount Prospect, IL. Ms. Tortorello read a list
of reasons why the proposed development was a bad idea. This list ranged from the design of the development to
also what would be done for snow removal. She also addressed issues with traffic, parking, and for the lack of
request for proposals.
Chairman Rogers swore in Robert Gniech, 10 S. Wille, Mount Prospect, IL. Mr. Gniech does not like the design
and views parking in the Village lot to the North of the development to be a major issue. He would like to view
another site.
Chairman Rogers swore in Carl Johnson, 11 S. Wille, Mount Prospect, IL. Mr. Johnson agrees with Chairman
Rogers in regards to the parking. He believes that parking in the downtown area is a problem. He stated that the
traffic study was completed before the closure of Busse Ave. Mr. Johnson believes that the Village parking lot
would be used more by drivers to cut through to Northwest Hwy. He asked if a no left turn sign could be placed
at Main Street and the parking lot to eliminate some of the traffic.
Chairman Rogers swore in James Grady, 40 E. Northwest Hwy., Mount Prospect, IL. Mr. Grady wanted to know
the height of the buildings. He also wanted to know if other projects could be considered. Mr. Grady also asked
what the zoning is for the proposed development.
Mr. Cooney said the zoning for the site and the area bounded by Central Road, Northwest Hwy., and roughly
Emerson St. is B-SC. Mr. Cooney stated that B-5 Core allows mixed-use developments built throughout the
downtown area.
Mr. Grady said he was concerned with limitation on the type of businesses and he wanted to know how the
residents above these developments are protected. Mr. Grady led a discussion regarding Elements Fitness and
what restrictions fitness gyms would have on hours of operation, etc.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-37-07
Page 6
Mr. Cooney said that Elements had to obtain a Conditional Use for their operation, but that a 24 hour convenience
store would be permitted in the downtown area. Mr. Cooney stated that 24 hour businesses are part of the mixed
use lifestyle. He summarized that certain uses may need a Conditional Use and some do not.
Mr. Grady concluded his statements by saying that parking at the Emerson building is a problem.
Chairman Rogers swore in Joanna ChalIacombe, 11 S. Wille, Mount Prospect, IL. She said the plan was
beautiful, but also has concerns for the parking. She asked if the number of units could be reduced above the
proposed parking garage. She stated that parking in her building is a 1.3 ratio and is inadequate. She stated a 2
bedroom unit in her building with 2 adults only has 1 parking space. Ms. ChalIacombe had additional concerns
about whether or not this would be considered a green building.
Ms. ChalIacombe said she crossed Main St. at 7:30 p.m. to attend the meeting and had no problems. She believed
that the VilIage should encourage walking and biking and she hasn't heard the Petitioners discuss bike parking in
the proposed development. Ms. ChalIacombe concluded by asking what would restrict Metra train riders from
parking in the public garage and taking the train.
Chairman Rogers asked the Petitioners to address some of the questions and concerns addressed by the residents.
Mr. Fitzgerald stated that bike storage would be provided in the proposed buildings. He mentioned that aII of his
projects look at green principles and strategies. He did not know if the proposed development would be LEEDs
(green) certified.
Chairman Rogers asked about the structure of the buildings. Mr. Fitzgerald said the building structure would be a
poured place concrete system and steel frame precast plank system. The buildings would be sound proof and
stated that they would have to abide by Village Code. Mr. Fitzgerald discussed the heights of the buildings. He
said that they would work with Staff regarding garage security.
Mr. Cooney stated that the public component of the proposed garage would be patrolIed by Police. It will be weIl
lit at aII times and there would not be a security guard.
Chairman Rogers asked what the Village would do for people parking in the public portion of the garage during
the daytime and riding the train. Mr. Cooney said they would be ticketed as most of the downtown parking is for
two hours.
Mr. Fitzgerald discussed emergency vehicle access. He said the development is surrounded by roads with access
from four points and the plaza could be engineered to support emergency vehicles. Mr. Fitzgerald stated for every
project he has completed, parking has been an issue. He said to go from a 1.3 ratio to a 1.6 would equal adding
60 spaces.
Mr. Heimbaugh said ifhe took aII of the units larger than 1 bedroom and assigns 2 parking spaces, it would be 75
units and 150 parking spaces. He continued by stating each 1 bedroom unit has 1 space for each of the 30 units.
This would create a total of 180 parking spaces at a 1.7 ratio. The proposed development has 169 total spaces for
residential that equal the 1.6 ratio as proposed. Mr. Heimbaugh stated that he has never had every 2 bedroom unit
purchase 2 parking spaces. He said the absolute maximum would be a 1.7 ratio.
Chairman Rogers said that he understood the ratio, but stated that there is currently a parking problem and the
proposal would add to the problem. He said by trying to eliminate some of the parking issues and make sure the
Petitioners do not aggravate the issue.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-37-07
Page 7
Mr. Youngquist asked if it was the intention to sell the parking spaces. Mr. Heimbaugh said that 1 parking space
is included when a unit is purchased. A second space can be purchased.
Chairman Rogers asked the possibility of a no left turn sign from Northbound Main St. into the Village parking
lot. Mr. Worthman stated that he met with the Village's Engineering Staff. He mentioned that Staff was very
comfortable with what was being proposed with the current design. Mr. Worthman agreed that the traffic would
need to be monitored and if changes needed to be made, they would be. He said this could be accomplished at a
later date.
Chairman Rogers asked about snow removal from the property. Mr. Heimbaugh stated that it would be piled into
the middle of the plaza. He discussed the possibility of heating portions of the public plaza pavement to minimize
the amount of snow build up.
Chairman Rogers questioned the look of the parking garage. Mr. Heimbaugh said that they could minimize the
amount of metal on the parking structure and increase the masonry.
Mr. Cooney discussed emergency access and stated that an ambulance could drive through the plaza. He said that
the Fire Department has reviewed the plans and did not indicate any concerns. Mr. Cooney advised that Staff
could follow-up on emergency access.
Mr. F1oros asked if it was possible to increase the amount of parking without impacting the existing plans. Mr.
Heimbaugh stated that they have two options. One would be to alter the ratio between public and private parking
and the second would be to reduce the number of residential units.
Discussion continued with the Commission and Petitioners regarding the parking ratio.
Chairman Rogers asked if the Petitioners could increase the size of the parking garage. Mr. Fitzgerald replied by
asking what the Planning and Zoning would be comfortable with. Chairman Rogers said 200 spaces or at least a
1.7 ratio.
Mr. Youngquist is concerned with the location of the proposed parking garage to the North. He believed that
guests ofthe condos would take up spaces in the public portion of the parking garage.
Mr. Fitzgerald said in order to gain a 1.7 ratio, he said they could remove the penthouse units in the East building
and that would reduce the overall units to 101. Then there would be 168 spaces and they would need to find a
couple more spaces to bring the total to 170 or a ratio of 1.7.
Chairman Rogers asked if there was an easier way to pick up the additional spaces by increasing the size.
Mr. Youngquist said that he did not have a problem with the 1.6 ratio for residential parking; the issue is with the
size of the public portion of the proposed garage.
Further discussion continued regarding utilizing the downtown parking deck and the Metra lot.
Mr. Floros made a motion to approve case PZ-37-07, a request to approve a Conditional Use (Planned Unit
DevelopmentlMixed Use Commercial and Residential) at 6-34 W. Busse Ave., 12-20 W. Northwest Hwy., and the
easternmost 10' of Wille Street right of way adjacent to the property; Ms. Haaland seconded the motion.
Chairman Rogers said he wanted to add an amendment to take a second look at the parking to be a part of the
motion. He would like to see an increase. Mr. Floros said at least a parking ratio of 1.7.
Richard Rogers, Chair
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting March 27, 2008
PZ-37-07
Page 8
Mr. Cooney stated that the Staff's recommendation includes for a Variation to approve the maximum height of
88.6 feet and a request of a Variance for parking from 137 to 107 for the commercial component in the motion.
Mr. Floras said he will support this proposal as it represents change for Mount Prospect. He discussed the reasons
why he liked the proposal.
UPON ROLL CALL:
AYES: Floros, Haaland, Rogers
NAYS: Youngquist
Chairman Rogers said there was a 3-1 vote. This case moves onto the Village Board without the Planning and
Zoning's approval. He stated that it would take a super majority vote from the Village Board for approval.
Keith Youngquist made a motion to adjourn at 10:30 p.m. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the
meeting was adjourned.
/'/1 /!j
-' ,/
/h /
;~ // ,r(
Ryan Kast, Community Development
Administrative Assistant
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 37-07
LOCATION:
PETITIONER:
OWNER:
PARCEL #:
LOT SIZE:
ZONING:
LAND USE:
REQUEST:
Downtown Triangle/Entertainment District.
Heimbaugh Capital Development Corp.
Varies
Multiple
1.98 acres
B-5C Core Commercial District
Commercial Retail Buildings
1) Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development
LOCATION MAP
10 Hi 10 10 10 10 10
10
55555 10
10
II)
W
-l
-l
i
II)
31)
10
16
E
10 6
12
18
2
32 0 22 0
30
W.BUSSEAV_ -
19 15 108
110
2
II)
i:
)>
Z
~
4
~,.
o
o
101
040
MEMORANDUM
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RICHARD ROGERS, CHAIRPERSON
FROM:
BRIAN SIMMONS, AICP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DATE:
MARCH 17, 2008
HEARING DATE:
MARCH 27,2008
SUBJECT:
PZ-37-07 - PHASE 1 OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER (HEIMBAUGH
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT)
BACKGROUND
A public hearing has been scheduled for the March 27, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review
the application by Heimbaugh Capital Development Corp. (the "Petitioner), regarding the property commonly
known as the "small triangle" and/or sub-area # 1 (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking approval of a
Conditional Use permit for a Planned Unit Development. The P&Z Commission hearing was properly noticed in
the March 12,2008 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written
notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted Public Hearing signs on the Subject Property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located northwest of the intersection of Northwest Highway and Main Street, and contains
existing retail buildings with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned B-5C Core Commercial
District and is bordered by the B-5C Core Commercial District to the east, north, and west, and the 1-2 Railroad
District to the south. The Metra railroad tracks are located across Northwest Highway to the south of the Subject
Property.
SUMMARY
The Petitioner proposes a complete redevelopment of the subject parcels with the exception of the existing Blues
Bar Restaurant. The existing restaurant will be incorporated into the overall development plan for the property.
As proposed, the project will be performed in two phases and will consist of the construction of three new mixed-
use buildings. The project will ultimately incorporate approximately 35,000 sq. ft. of new retail space, 105
residential units, and structured parking for 276 vehicles. Phase one ofthe project includes the construction ofthe
seven-story west building and five-story north building. The seven-story structure will consist of 19,475 sq. ft of
retail space on the building's first floor, with fifty-five (55) residential condominium units on the building's upper
levels. The north five-story structure will include the structured parking spaces and an additional four (4)
condominium units and six (6) duplex units. The total number of residential units in phase one will therefore be
sixty-five (65) units. Phase two will involve the construction of the remaining six-story east building. This final
phase will include 15,990 sq. ft. of retail space on the building's first floor, and forty (40) condominium units on
the upper levels.
PZ-37-07
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting March 27, 2008
Page 3
As part of the redevelopment of the subject parcels, the right-of-way for Busse Avenue, between Wille Street and
Main Street, and a portion of the right-of-way for Wille Street will be vacated and incorporated into the project.
The proposed project is consistent with the planning design principles for a Transit Oriented Development (TOD).
TOD is a design concept that speaks to a mixed-use environment surrounding a transit station. The goal of a TOD
district is to provide uses within close proximity to one another that allow individuals to walk from one location to
another. Ideally, TOD districts require a good mix of uses including residential, retail, and service oriented office
uses. To create a comfortable pedestrian environment, TOD's require wider sidewalks (greater than 10 feet) and
other streetscape elements such as planting beds, benches, and transparency at the street level of buildings. The
existing central core district of Mount Prospect has developed over time to create a viable TOD district which
incorporates several of these design principles. The proposed mixed-use development is consistent with transit
oriented design and will further enhance the amenities provided within the downtown area.
Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development - The Subject Property is currently zoned B-5C Core
Commercial District, and the Petitioner is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a mixed-use Planned
Unit Development. According to the Village's Zoning Code, mixed commercial and residential developments
require approval of a planned unit development (PUD). The PUD process allows for unified zoning control over
the entire development, which would require formal Village approval if any modifications were proposed to the
development in the future. The underlying B-5C district allows for a maximum density of thirty (30) dwelling
units per acre, with PUD standards allowing this density to be increased to a maximum density of eighty (80)
dwelling units per acre. The Petitioner's proposal includes a density of fifty-three (53) units per acre (105
units/1.98 acres), which falls below the maximum density permitted within a PUD located in the B-5C District.
Site Plan - The attached site plan illustrates the proposed layout for the mixed-use development. As designed, the
buildings will utilize a build forward design which will create a uniform street presence for the development and
adjacent properties. As proposed building setbacks along Northwest Highway, Wille Street (after ROW
vacation), and the public lot to the north will be zero feet, while the building setback along Main Street is 7 feet.
The proposed setbacks will meet code requirements as the B-5C district does not require minimum building
setbacks along property lines. To enhance the pedestrian environment, a plaza area will be constructed between
the two primary buildings. The plaza will provide a pedestrian path from the intersection of Busse and Main
Street, through the development to Northwest Highway. The plaza will include pedestrian amenities such as a
fountain, planting beds with seating walls, and outdoor seating areas.
Three drop-off and loading zones are proposed along the developments street frontages with Main and Wille
Streets. Nine on-street parallel parking is provided along Northwest Highway. The parallel parking spaces will
provide convenient parking for the retail tenants of the development while also providing a uniform street
presence along Northwest Highway similar to adjacent developments.
The site plan also illustrates sidewalks around the proposed development which vary in width from fifteen (15)
feet to seven (7) feet. To provide a comfortable pedestrian environment, wider sidewalks are proposed along
Main Street and Northwest Highway which maintain a minimum width often (10) feet. Sidewalks located along
Wille Street and the drop-off areas on Main Street are reduced to seven (7) feet due to their greater distance from
vehicular traffic.
Building Design - The proposed buildings will utilize a contemporary architectural style. The buildings will be
constructed with durable materials which consist primarily of brick, cast stone, cement fiber board, and spandrel
glass. At the pedestrian level, the building will incorporate cast stone at its base, with glass and an aluminum
storefront system at retail locations. Fabric awnings are proposed above the retail tenant spaces which will further
enhance the pedestrian environment.
PZ-37-07
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting March 27, 2008
Page 4
The upper levels of the building fayade will incorporate several vertical bump-outs and recessed areas which will
help to break up the massing of the structures. Balconies, terraces, bay windows, in addition to the vertical relief
elements will provide play with light and shadow across the building's fayade. The corners of the buildings will
incorporate spandrel glass towers with metal cornice features that will provide an iconic presence to the buildings.
The parking structure will be constructed of brick materials that will match the existing Blues Bar Restaurant
building. In addition to brick, metal louvers and metal panels are proposed on the building's fayade to screen
vehicles within the structure from view. While the overall architectural design of the development is more
contemporary in nature, the proposed buildings will add to the mix of architectural styles within the core
commercial area.
Site Access - The proposed site plan shows that residents and customers will access the parking structure from
two locations. One access into the structure will be provided off of Wille Street, while a secondary access will be
provided from the existing public parking lot to the north of the development. The Wille Street frontage will also
include a retail loading zone internal to the building, with a residential drop-off and retail loading zone on-street.
A retail drop-off zone is proposed along Main Street with nine parallel parking spaces proposed on Northwest
Highway.
Parking - As proposed, parking for the development will be incorporated entirely within the parking structure
proposed on the north portion of the development. The structure will consist of 276 parking spaces which will be
utilized for retail customers, residents, and their guests. Of the 276 spaces, 107 are reserved for retail customers
and 169 spaces are for the condominium residents. Therefore, the parking ratio for the residential component of
the project is 1.6 spaces per unit which would exceed the amount of parking provided in other downtown projects.
The additional nine parking spaces provided along Northwest Highway will provide additional convenient
parking for retail customers visiting the development.
Landscape Plan - The Petitioner's landscape plan provides parkway trees along the Northwest Highway and Main
Street frontages. Final streetscape design must be reviewed and approved at time of permit issuance. Planters
along Main Street shall be provided to mirror the streetscape design that exists to the north ofthe subject property.
In addition to the streetscape elements, the plaza area located between the two buildings will incorporate planting
beds to provide additional natural amenities to the site. Decorative pavers and pavement will be utilized in the
plaza area and sidewalk locations around the building to complete the streetscape.
Finally, the project will also incorporate green building design elements that will further enhance the
development. The terrace levels of the proposed buildings (above retail spaces) will provide planting areas that
will enhance the building's architecture and be an added amenity to the residents of the proposed development. In
general, green roofs similar to those proposed in the terrace levels, help to reduce the urban heat island effect by
reducing impervious areas and providing additional plant materials in urban environments. Additionally, green
roofs assist in decreasing the amount of storm water run-off from properties by creating more locations on site
that can absorb rain water.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING
The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Central Commercial Use. This land use designation
is appropriate for a dense, intensive land use pattern which focuses on an urban style of development and
architectures. Mixed-use development, with retail on the first level of the building and residential on upper levels,
is recommended within this land use designation. The proposed development therefore is consistent with this
designation and is appropriate for the area.
PZ-37-07
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting March 27, 2008
Page 5
GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE
As previously mentioned, the petitioner is requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development within the B-5C
Central Core Zoning District for Phase One of the Mount Prospect Town Center. As such, the standards for
Planned Unit Developments would supersede the underlying zoning requirements. Per Section 14.504 of the
Village Code, maximum density of a PUD within the B-5C Core District may not exceed eighty (80) units per
acre. The proposed 105 residential units on 1.98 acre site will result in a density of fifty-three (53) units per acres.
Regarding building height, maximum building height within the B-5C district is eighty (80) feet. The main
building structure of the seven-story building will measure at eighty (80) feet to its roof line; however the turret
tower at the comer of the building will extend to a maximum height of 88 feet 6 inches. The six-story structure
will meet the code requirements for structure height.
Staff is supportive of the building height variation as the majority of the structure will be constructed to district
standards. The tower feature which will exceed the 80 foot limitation is centrally located in the property and
provides architectural interest to the structure.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The standards for approving a Planned Unit Development are listed in Section 14.504 of the Village Zoning
Ordinance. The section contains specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Planned Unit
Development. These standards relate to:
· The proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is to be
located;
· The principal use in the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the recommendations of
the comprehensive plan of the village for the area containing the subject site;
· That the proposed planned unit development is in the public interest and is consistent with the purposes of
this zoning ordinance.
· That the streets have been designed to avoid inconvenient or unsafe access to the planned unit
development and for the surrounding neighborhood; and that the development does not create an
excessive burden on public parks, recreation areas, schools, and other public facilities which serve or are
proposed to serve the planned unit development.
The proposal is consistent with the Village's Comprehensive Land Use Map and is compatible with the
underlying zoning for the property. The mixed-use development will be compatible with other redevelopment
projects that have occurred within the downtown area and will be an added benefit to this area of the Village.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Conditional Use for a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development meets the standards for this request as
listed in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning
Commission approve the following motion:
"To approve:
I) A Conditional Use permit for Phase One of a mixed-use Planned Unit Development consisting of 65 residential
units and approximately 19,000 sq. feet of retail subject to compliance with the following:
A. Variation approval to allow:
a. A maximum building height of 88 feet 6 inches.
PZ-37-07
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting March 27, 2008
Page 6
B. Development of the site in general conformance with the site and landscape plans prepared by OKW
Architects, dated March 21, 2008;
C. Development of the units in general conformance with the floor plans prepared by OKW Architects,
dated March 6, 2008;
D. Development of the elevations in general conformance with the prepared by OKW Architects, dated
February 13,2008;
E. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Petitioner shall submit a lighting plan that complies with
the Village's lighting regulations for the lighting within the development;
F. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the petitioner shall submit detailed streetscape plans that
are consistent with the Village's Streetscape Program design guidelines. All expenses related to the
design and installation of these improvements is the petitioner's responsibility;
G. The Petitioner shall construct all units according to all Village Codes and regulations, including, but
not limited to: the installation of automatic fire sprinklers, fire hydrants and roads must be located and
constructed according to Development and Fire Code standards.
The Village Board's decision is final for this case, for the property commonly known as the "small triangle"
and/or sub-area #1, Case No. PZ-37-07.
I concur:
William J. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development
Iii H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z ZOO8\Staff Report\PZ-37-07 MEMO (Downtown Triangle Entertainment District. PUD Conditional Use),doc
.....en 1
~~II~~~C~A.:c::~ ~~~~O~~1 ~~'WSrM~~Il:~~~~$ION IN
IOWN5MI...'_lM.IlAMa"[&SICll'TM[TM.-o....,,,CIP&l.W[tIOIoN..CtcItOlMCY011c(
...U lMlfICor'[GlS1'[II{O" IM[IlC1S'IR....SoFflC[QI"COQoI [:(lUIllf.llNOC1o.U21. 1'"
AS OOCUlll:'" 1.11 )~61__. [lC[PI TMAI 'Ml TM[fIC(ll' onc...o .5 flll.lo.s
'&IIQ~ 2:
:=~'';~T..::,lg; ~~n~~. ~o~~5(.,A:.':~~~c~~rorlH:-~:-=~:
II[IIIQIA..,otstlla:O&5 fCUOWS
PHASE
EXHIBIT
1
PAllen);
lOT 2 '..II[[IlSllMol f1CS1II1ll"'5/OIf1ll/lOUN1 JIIl(JSfIl:C1. 1[t.\K..llt5UlOl1ol510ll (ll"'"or
1I1[w[SJM.IU"(ll's[CnQN'2.T~.IJl(llTM.IAtlGElI[1.S1Q1"TM(TMII!D"","CIPAL
UVllOlIlli.AC~101N[P~.'TM[flCcrltC1ST('[OINWfICMlIl""'SOfTIt[(ll'CQOI<
~1Y.OIlQC1G8(1l27.1'1&&$00QJU["'~Il)S-"-'''.CU:CPTIMA1PAlIIDq;l[or
OUC_lto .S'Ol~",""
.1lI....IIC.T
UllUl(SU
~JTM
''''''CCllio.
"AI P"'T (ll' TM[[.SI101ltl(uctPTI0I[IIQRTM100flt1A/<fDC_CCP''''AI'0lI1
0E0ICAUO'OIIIUSSlA'o1;IIU{)01l0121N.UIOlJ""IUSSl:Atl!lWU['SI($U8Ol"'5lONor
YQUOITfIlIOSP(CllllstCtlONI2._SM"'.,I1Q11M..oUlf.(I1('O'SIQ1"lM[__C....~
U(1II01AH. 0l5t118lO AS 'Q..~OWS.
..<Ct~ .
,""l'AlIIOITM[[.SIIOIUIIUC[I'11H[IItJIINIQI)1((TANOc.ClPITMAlP&II'
DlOIU,1IOf'Oll'USSE ."';lIlll) 01 \012 "I~OC. )ItIIUSK A/<fD1IIIUI.SI(SUllQI~ONor
:::'O:A:':rcsJ:.~ ~i':'~ '_SHl" ., IIQllM. IIOHac " lAST 01" TM[ 1_0 P"'CII'A~
P....cu.
lMAlPAIlIOflo,...1IQUltl1'llllSfl(ttC[N11l&l.0IS1IIICTSlitDl_orPM101"TII[
lOUT N.IU" or seCtiON 12. lO"'Of5HlP.' NOIlTM. UIfG( 11 USI or TMl _ _"'.
wuo.....cc......tOtM(Pl..TIIt(U(ll'II[CDlOl:OOC:C[.....'" ....,uOOC\IYC..,
127"02. L....llSllUIH/:'l1Ill" 'IHt: lIII[SQIII.l'U1[MSlOllDl" 1111 SOUTMtll/lllQSI LJIft or lOl 2
IIIS&IOlolllUNTP\I05fI(Cla:NIII"LOIS1IIlClSU8Ol'o'SIOIl.Al.llNCOOICCOUlfIl'.UJNClI5
""ell "
~Ol I 01" OUNlINQONUtSlItlUllOl....S1011. KIIfllAIlt:5UlIOl'M1ON Ill" 101S. &110 ~'N.oo"
..UII'SSUIOl....51DIIQf"..lor8LlICIlIIOl"IolOUIITfIlIOSI'[CI.IN-.:llI[STN....ror
S1:ClllJN 12. -:so- .1 1101..... .&/fG[ I' CA" or TI<[ n.u __AL 11[lIIOI....
IlCCOIOWllTOJllI"L.1THl:lItOfIltCOlt\lfOSlPyt..O..lIR,uOOC\lll[lIllU..797....L
lIICOll';COUNI'l'.UItIO'S
p..en "
LO'S~.).'&II01K"",,,'T[IlUIYINJOMNIl(lJ(SSUao,_or''''OI"''OC_''or
t,lIllIfII fIIIOSf'[Cl.111 TM[IIU1>Uo1.1 01 Sl:ClIDII 12. 1000SMlP.' IIQITM.'II&11(;[11 [&5TOf
TMlTNlllOPllINClP.1>l(1IrD\AN.IlCCOIIOINC10'lll("LAtTMl'll[Offl(COI'O[DI1IIl.1"'l':R.
It), ASOOCUUt..IIOM11all. "",llN COOl< CO\.IIl'I.lLUIICllS
p__en ,
''''lSOf \lI~l[ S"'tll &IIlD USSI: .'<<Nil[ 1(1 I[ ".CATIO IN 1M\: .nl NAtf Of KC1>OII12,
~~ors-" .' _TM, lIiI.Nll[ " t.S1 or 1M[ '''0 _A( IIU/OIAM. &l.~ II< COOIl CQUtlw.
r----T--,---r---I--
I I I I I
;>ROIiPEC1PLAr.rII
r.U3l'1IVI:!IOII
Lor I
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 4 PARCEL 5
PARCEL 6
'"
CO
Ow
C3!i:
0::,
E-E-
",w
o::w
;:>0::
:r:E-
:::;;'"
...J:z,
w_
<(
e
t.4~liIlSo,;~I'
AI[SUllDIV!$r'JrJI!'
M(:ut.' ,.<I0.....EC1
PI/SSE A~lO MEEHSI,Ul.lJ
1lC:';~~~!~;~;O" Il~-~~~~~:;~OH
I;'; "'Ollra ~Aos~ECT
PROSne!
E-
'"
'"
0::
E-
'"
W
...J
...J
~
..~~~ ~r
t
NORTH
!
",Q
i U; z
<DC
Z
~
PHASE 1 EXHIBIT
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
ELMHURST ROAD & NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
1J~~:~8~ 'iS~~~~~S
t.,our/T p :.S"<;~T
Mourn "R.1S~[CT
CEIlT~..L. D1S:TRI~-
$U!I '.';$ION
Piol1TCF
I 0' ~
PARCEL 9
{I.ie'"
.... QQV
~~ BUSSTE'-AVENUE
~~"!.
~/
PARCEL 7
CCRP"it,>.H
SWlOIVIStCIIi N~. 9
I
J:lI'U ~ll'~!l'$
SLJDtIl\'l~tOI!
DIINMlNOC,;,I,;r5
Mli-SUtlOIVICIC,r,
KEI.."""
11!:<iUtlOl'tISll'll ,~,
~iOij'''1 PIfC~"t.C..
I\ro~
1'41J.-.
~81'
4/(;'
41p4r
~CONSUL TING, INC.
~ &~ .-_'...11....."";......,
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS ac LAND SURVEYORS
3DO NAAOLIAROT ORM: WHHlI~." 500t0 PH. a4J "~-1I)) rAX ~ lI5-1l17
I'll(pIlll'(orOR SCALE:I".20'
AlL OISTANCES IN fen AND DECIIIU.l PAInS 1HEREOF. NO
OI,l,jENStO"'S 10 BE ASSUloIEO rROM SCALINC
COl.lPARE YOVR DESCRIPTiON ,f.N[) StTE 1oIAAl(INCS WI1H THIS PlAT
AN[) A1 ONCE REPOR1 ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH YOU IllA.Y rIND
FIELD CREW: H/. l'lELO WORK:"'/.
DRAnEO BY, J.H
PHASE
1
PARCEL 1:
LOT 1 (EXCEPT THAT PART VACATED PER DOCUMENT 00454455) IN MEERSMAN RESUBDIVlSION IN
MOUNT PROSPECT, BEING A RESUBDIVlSION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12,
TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRO PRINCIPAL MERIOIAN, ACCOROING TO THE
PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE REGISTRAR'S OFFICE OF COOK COUNTY, ON OCTOBER 27, 1986
AS DOCUMENT LR 35-61-889, EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 06
MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1. A DISTANCE OF 23.07 FEET
TO A LINE THAT IS THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 2 IN MOUNT
PROSPECT CENTRAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12.
TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 23. 1949 AS DOCUMENT 1275902; THENCE SOUTH 89
DEGREES 35 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST. ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION, 46.73 FEET TO THE
WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST, ALONG
SAID WEST LINE. 24.71 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES
23 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE. 46.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, ALL IN COOK COUNTY. ILLINOIS.
PARCEL 2:
THAT PART OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 3 IN BUSSE AND WILLE'S RESUBDIVlSION IN MOUNT PROSPECT IN
THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 60 FEET OF SAID
LOT 2 WITH THE NORTH LINE OF BUSSE AVENUE AS DEDICATED BY DOCUMENT NO. 342070;
THENCE WESTWARD ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 50.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST, 101.08 FEET TO A LINE
THAT IS THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 2 IN MOUNT PROSPECT
CENTRAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41
NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 1949 AS DOCUMENT 1275902; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 35
MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST. ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION, 23.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE
OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID WEST
LINE. 22.12 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 23 MINUTES
49 SECONDS EAST. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 23.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL IN
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
PARCEL 3:
LOT 2 IN MEERSMAN RESUBDIVlSION IN MOUNT PROSPECT. BEING A RESUBDIVlSION OF PART OF
THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE REGISTRAR'S OFFICE OF COOK
COUNTY. ON OCTOBER 27. 1986 AS DOCUMENT LR 35-61-889, EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 06
MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A OISTANCE OF 21.32 FEET
TO A LINE THAT IS THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 2 IN MOUNT
PROSPECT CENTRAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12,
TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 23. 1949 AS DOCUMENT 1275902; THENCE SOUTH 89
DEGREES 35 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION, 23.00 FEET TO THE
WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST. ALONG
SAID WEST LINE. 22.12 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES
23 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 23.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
EXHIBIT
PARCEL 4:
THAT PART OF THE EAST 60 FEET (EXCEPT THE NORTH 100 FEET AND EXCEPT THAT PART
DEDICATED FOR BUSSE AVENUE) OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 3 IN BUSSE AND WlLLE'S RESUBDlVlSION OF
MOUNT PROSPECT IN SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 100 FEET OF SAID LOT 2
AND THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 60 FEET OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 06
MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST. ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 21.32 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS THE
WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 2 IN MOUNT PROSPECT CENTRAL
DISTRICT SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE
11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED
DECEMBER 23. 1949 AS DOCUMENT 1275902 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89
DEGREES 35 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST. ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION, 35.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE,
100.46 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF BUSSE AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 10 MINUTES
36 SECONDS WEST. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF BUSSE, 35.01 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE
EAST 60 FEET OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST,
ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 100.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL IN COOK COUNTY.
ILLINOIS.
PARCEL 5:
THAT PART OF THE EAST 60 FEET (EXCEPT THE NORTH 100 FEET AND EXCEPT THAT PART
DEDICATEO FOR BUSSE AVENUE) OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 3 IN BUSSE ANO WILLE'S RESUBDIVlSION OF
MOUNT PROSPECT IN SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 100 FEET OF SAID LOT 2
AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 44 SECONDS
WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE. 19.22 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE
SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 2 IN MOUNT PROSPECT CENTRAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION OF PART OF
THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 23. 1949 AS DOCUMENT
1275902. AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 44 SECONDS
WEST. CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 100.27 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF BUSSE AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF BUSSE.
25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST. PARALLEL WITH SAID
EAST LINE. 100.46 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 35
MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION, 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. ALL IN COOK COUNTY. ILLINOIS.
PARCEL 6:
THAT PART OF LOT 4 IN MOUNT PROSPECT CENTRAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE
WEST HALF OF SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 23. 1949 AS DOCUMENT
1275902. LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 2
IN SAID MOUNT PROSPECT CENTRAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION. ALL IN COOK COUNTY. ILLINOIS.
PARCEL 7:
LOT 1 OF DUNKIN DONUTS RESUBDIVlSION. BEING A RESUBDIVlSION OF LOTS 4 AND 5 IN JOHN
MEYN'S SUBDIVISION OF' PART OF BLOCK 16 OF MOUNT PROSPECT. IN THE WEST HALF OF
SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 AS DOCUMENT 26244797. ALL
IN COOK COUNTY. ILLINOIS.
PARCEL 8:
LOTS 2, 3, 6 AND THE PRIVATE ALLEY IN JOHN MEYN'S SUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 16 OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF
THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED FEBRUARY 26,
1931 AS DOCUMENT 10851688, ALL IN COOK COUNTY. ILLINOIS.
PARCEL 9:
PARTS OF WILLE STREET AND BUSSE AVENUE TO BE VACATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12,
TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ALL IN COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6-34 WEST BUSSE AVENUE AND
12-20 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
WHEREAS, Heimbaugh Capital Development ("Petitioner), has filed a petition for a Conditional
Use permit for a Planned Unit Development and Variation with respect to property located at 6-
34West Busse Avenue and 12-20 West Northwest Highway ("Property") as legally described on the
attached Exhibit "A"; and
Property Index Numbers: 08-12-102-057/058/030/059/060/061/062
08-12-107-022/003/020/004/006/007; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks to create a Planned Unit Development! Mixed Use Commercial
and Residential; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional
Use permit and Variation being the subject of Case No. PZ-37 -07 before the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of March, 2008, pursuant to proper
legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 12th day of March,
2008; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendation
to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect in support of the request
being the subject of PZ-37 -07; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given
consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the requests meet the standards of
the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit for a Planned Unit
Development and Variation to allow a maximum building height of 88' 6" as shown on the attached
"Exhibit A," would be in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE
OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the Conditional Use Permit for a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development
is subject to the following conditions:
A. Development of the site in general conformance with the site and landscape plans
prepared by OKW Architects, dated May 6, 2008;
B. Development of the units in general conformance with the floor plans prepared by
OKW Architects, dated May 6, 2008
C. Development of the elevations in general conformance with the plans prepared by
OKW Architects, dated May 6,2008. n
Page 2/2
PZ-37-07
D. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Petitioner shall submit a lighting plan that
complies with the Village's lighting regulations for the lighting within the
development;
E. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Petitioner shall submit detailed
streetscape plans that are consistent with the Village's Streetscape Program design
guidelines. All expenses related to the design and installation of these
improvements is the Petitioner's responsibility;
F. The Petitioner shall construct all units according to all Village Codes and regulations,
including, but not limited to: the installation of automatic fire sprinklers, fire hydrants
and roads must be located and constructed according to Development and Fire
Code standards.
SECTION THREE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do
hereby grant approval of a Conditional Use permit and Variation as provided in Sections 14.203.F.7,
Sec. 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code, for a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development consisting of 57
residential units and approximately 19,000 square feet of retail, all as shown on the Site Plan dated
May 6, 2008 a copy of which is attached and made a part this ordinance.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of
this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval
and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
C:\Documents and Settings\LAngell\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK9CF\C USEVARsmalltriangleheimbaughmay2008 (3).doc
~'
.
~
\
W
>
~
()
W
0-
en
a:::
w
0- 0::
a::: w
w I-
z Z
a::: w
0 <..) en
()
~ z 0
en ~ Z
<( 0 .....J
W .....J
::I: I-
~ l- t-='
L ::> <..) <..)
0 w w
en a.. a..
en en
0 0
-- 0:: 0::
a.. a..
l- I-
Z Z
:J :J
0 0
~ ~
(I "
,
\ l\
\ t;
\
~
" .
,
~
II) ;t
1:) ~
.s Ii:
~ ~
~ ~
o ~
a.
u
o
u
:r:
r
I
Il
'=:!
Ii
5TH FLOQH~,;,.I.
+48'-0" V,
:il
4TH FLOOR ~'
+37'-4"
SOUTH PERSPECTIVE
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
eM
OKW Architects
DATE:MAY 06,2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
~
- I !
--i ~,. "'__
-- --
--
or""
iI'_~ Q
";" I
$~.', ~ ; ;
}'. ~~". .1' \~~
.. ~
.::::lI ~ ~ ~'1
: ."" ~ , < . . .
1:1 i'~" 'i' ;. .~..~
'" ~ ",
n , · - Ell I 7- t. ~
"'-
~.
D..
· - l..--,.. T T-
I., I I
_.'"
.11
\
~.I '.'....
~,-'
$ ROOF
+80'-0"
$ 7TH FLOOR !---
+69'-4"
.
I
....~-
$ 6TH FLOOR
+58'-8"
.~.._--...~- .-",-~
$ ~~~,~~OOR
$ 4TH FLOOR
+37'-4"
1\
II
~
ROOF ~
+67'-8"
$ 3RD FLOOR
+26'.8"
1\
I
II.IA'
~
__-.I
I
I
II
~
... ,
............---- -
6TH FLOOR ~
+58'.8"
)
::l
~-
;;1
~
~
5TH FLOOR ~
+48'-0"
$ 2ND FLOOR
+16-0"
~
I
~ ~:::I 1".:1 I r,:;; ~
'lOl
I 1.JA1,,,,, -~- -~L _ ....._
~
I I J~ ~ ::l---:
...
4TH FLOOR ~
+37'-4'
3RD FLOOR ~
+26'-8'
'j', ;:-r- f"'-
'. I I
'" II!
1 T ~ TO::
~ - - r.-...f<1
..
~l_
$ 1 STFLOOR
+0'-0'
~-~~i6i,
I ..
~
I~
~
-Ii ~ _ --r
, - T. '----,~~
... '-,
, ~ ~ ~ I ' . - :----.- l' ""-~ -r r
1'- r 1 T --:::::::-, r ~ r________ ~, ~
I l
iI"St:~FL6(jR
'~~
1
,
SOUTHWEST CORNER PERSPECTIVE
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
'HCDC
eM
o KW Architects
DATE:MAY 06,2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 0712.
r-@
=
q, ROOF
+67'-8"
@-----I.
~,
j
q, ~~~" FLOOR
I I I
q, FIFTH FLOOR
+48'-0"
q, FOURTH FLOOR
+37'-4 "
@-\
'r-:-:--""'""lo
~~
~"
- -\;
~
-;
EAST ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
ill FACE BRICK #1 ~ METAL RAILING #1 @ PLANTERS
~ FACE BRICK #2 8 METAL RAILING #2 ~ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM
@ CASTSTONE @ METAL RAILING #3 METAL CANOPY
~ CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM ~ METAL CAP i RETAIL SIGNAG'
5 SPANDREL GLASS 1 METAL CORNICE FABRIC AWNING
6 CEMENT FIBER BOARD MECHANICAL SCREEN METAL LOUVERS
METAL PANEL
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
eM
OKW Architects
DATE:MAY 06. 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
~~~~
i "
7TH FLOOR ~
+69'-4"
$1~~~~OOR
6TH FLOOR ~
+58'-8"
III
15TH JLOOR ~
+48'-0"
II I
I. 4TH FLOOR ~
II +37'-4"
$ P:~KING L-4
+ 7-0"
NORTH ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
ill FACE BRICK #1 ~ METAL RAILING #1 @ PLANTERS
ill FACE BRICK #2 8 METAL RAILING #2 ~ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM
Q) CAST STONE @ METAL RAILING #3 METAL CANOPY
~ CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM i METAL CAP I RETAll S'GNAGE
S SPANDREL GLASS 1 METAL CORNICE FABRIC AWNING
CEMENT FIBER BOARD MECHANICAL SCREEN METAL LOWERS
METAL PANEL
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
eM
OKW Architects
DAlE: MAY 06, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
B
J
I
I I I I
f-
ItlJ I I ,
I~I I I
I ~ ,'1J I I
<( IS
I:::;:' lib
I .1 I I
I
I
EXISTING
2-5TORY
BUilDING
(BLUES BAR)
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCAlE: 1" = 60'
Ft:J N
o 15' 30' f ffi
60' W
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
VilLAGE HAU
PARKING GARAGE
VILLAGE HALL
N
KEY PLAN EB
cfiw
o'tWV Architects
DATE: MAY 6. 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
I
cl I
I
I I
I UN EXCAVATED I _ _ --.J ~
I ------1 _ PHASE II
I _ _ _
I L --- I r-
I - ',,-OO~'~ ~ / _ _ _ _ -, I A
~w" ,- ,_ I
I ~ I I
I I / I
I ~ h J I
OUT1.INE OF--" I
AI I I ."'~ I r
L I ~ I
-L, _~ /: ~
L~",- I If ~ I
"" I ---- I
"'- I
" "--L _ J I
- / I .
/ : :
I I
~ ~
""
"'-
"'-",- I
L_, :
l J
"'-
"'- /
~-
~ II III I II
I
S%~ LL:.l1'-l;' RAMPUP <:=J
I Q
1i@.IIIII;I-V------PUBLlcPARKING
'l/. I LOWER LEVEL:
~ 29 SPACES
~- - - - - - - - - -111-1
~OUT1.INE OF II ~ I
SUILDING II
ABOVE I I
II I
II I
EXISTING
BUILDING I
ABOVE
(BLUES BAR) I
B
UN EXCAVATED
.2'.S' J S%116%SLOPEDN Q
Q
c
N
KEY PLAN EB
MECHANICAL
ROOM
UN EXCAVATED
I
_f
/
~i;",
~I
~
B
LOWER LEVEL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 50'
FY N
o 12.5' 25' f CD
SO' W
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
cfiw
OKW Architects
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
PARKING LEVEL 2 PLAN
SCALE: 1" = SO'
FW N
o 12.5' 25' 1 EB
B
c
A
~OUTLINE OF
" ~ BUILDING
"'-- OPEN TO ABOVE
BELOW \
, I
I
I
-"-~
/
/
/
~i;"",
~ty
~I"
B
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
EXISTING
2 STORY
BUilDING
(BLUES BAR)
/
PHASE I
- """"PHASEi1
/
/
/
~
"
\-.- OPEN TO
BELOW \
,
r~~OUTlINE OF
BUILDING
ABOVE
I
I
I
c
N
~;l~ 1~~N EB
A
cfiw
OKW Architects
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
HCDC
~
OKW Architects
B
c
c
N
~;l~ 1~~~N EB
PHASE I
PHASErI
A
A
;;
/
/
/
~i;::::,
~ty
ct.ct.~
B
N
EB
w
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
SECOND FLOOR
SCALE: 1" = SO'
R:J r
o 12.5' 25' u
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
I
~
I
I
q
I
~
I
f--
J
A
THIRD FLOOR
SCALE: 1" = 50'
FbJ f
o 12.5' 25' 50'
N
EB
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
B
C-
--C
c
c
,
\-.- OPEN TO c
c BELOW"
,
c
c c
,- ------
'-OUTLINE OF
BUILDING
ABOVE
c
c
c
k
/
/
/
~r;;::"
~~
([.,f
B
HCDC
PHASE I
PHASEiI
/
/
/
/BALCONY,
TYP.
c
KEY PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 200'
N
EB
A
cfiw
OKW Architects
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
DATE: MAY 6, 2006
B
EXISTING
BUilDING
BELOW
(BLUES BAR)
c
~OUTlINE OF
BUILDING
ABOVE
.
~\ROOF
TERRACE
A
/
UNIT 403W
1B36 S.F.
/
/
}
/
/
/
~r;;:::,
~Jf
'<I'
B
FOURTH FLOOR
SCALE: 1" = SO'
FtJ N
o 12.5' 25' 1 ffi
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
c
KEY PLAN
N
ffi
SCALE: 1" = 200'
PHASE I
PHASE II
A
/-BALCONY,
TYP.
~
O'tWV Architects
DATE: MAY 6, 200B
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
EXISTING
BUILDING
BELOW
(BLUES BAR)
c
"'-ROOF
TERRACE
A
/
UNIT 503W
1836 S.F.
/
/
If
/
/
/
~~r:
~~j?
~
B
FIFTH FLOOR
SCALE: 1" = 50'
Fbi N
o 12.5' 25' 1 EB
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
c
KEY PLAN
N
EB
SCALE: 1" = 200'
PHASE I
PHASE II
A
",BALCONY,
TYP.
~
OKW Architects
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
~
.
c
UNIT 602W
1338 S.F.
A
UNIT 603W
1836 S.F.
~!i;""
~/;y
lJ.1'
SIXTH FLOOR
SCALE: 1" = 50'
FY f N
o 12.5' 25' 50' EB
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
B
/
/
B
HCDC
k
/
/
/
/
/
EXISTING
BUilDING
BELOW
(BLUES BAR)
MECHANICAL
ROOM
STORAGE
lOCKERS
c
KEY PLAN
N
EB
SCALE: 1" = 200'
PHASE I
PHASE II
A
cfiw
OKW Architects
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
...
4
ROOF
TERRACE~
c
A
UNIT 703W
1836 S.F.
/
~.....-::-
l~
q, q,~
SEVENTH FLOOR
SCALE: 1" = 50'
F1d N
o 12.5' 25' 1 EB
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
B
/
B
HCDC
k
/
/
/
EXISTING
BUILDING
BELOW
(BLUES BAR)
/
/
c
KEY PLAN
N
EB
SCALE: 1" = 200'
PHASE I
PHASEiI
A
cfiw
O'tWV Architects
DATE: MAY 6.2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
..
.
RTU SCREEN \
.
$ ~~?~" I
$ ~ii~~TH FLOOR CONDO 06 NORTH BUILDING \
BEYOND ROOF ""
CONDO 05 . II MECHANICAL II +67-8"
$ ~~~~. FLOOR ~ ~ SIXTH F;~~; ""
$ FIFTH FLOOR CONDO 04 CONDO 04 FIFTH F;~~~ ""
+48'.{)"
$ FOURTH FLOOR CONDO 03 -T---' .. 1 ; CONDO 03 FOURTH F;3~~~ ""
+37'-4" H I
$ THIRD FLOOR CONDO 02 .",-" - - ~~ '-'-. ..., - CONDO 02 THIRD F;2~~; ""
+26'-8" " - II CLUBHOUSE r,.
$ SECOND FLOOR CONDO 01 , " ,," CONDO 01 SECOND F;~i?O~ ""
+16.0" I I I II 1..----r-1 n
'"' FIRST FLOOR RETAIL IWtnltlW RETAIL FIRST FLOOR A MAIN STREET
WILLE STREET '1"+0'-0" +0'-0" V
SECTION A-A
SCALE: 1" = 50'.{)"
$ :~~,~~RET
WEST BUILDING\
BEYOND \
.
~~~6- ""
SEVENTH FLOOR ""
+69'-4"
SIXTH FLOOR ""
+58'-8"
FIFTH F;~~ ~
FOURTH F;~~~ ""
~ PARKI~~7t~ ""
--/ PARKI~~6!:o~ ""
--/ PARKIN~5tO~ ""
PARKING L-1
-8'-0"
RTU SCRE~ \
J ,," , ~'1;Cf
'F-f ~ Ft'"
~-~i"-f~+C~
, +
+f,1!"'rw...jL
NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
PUBLIC PARKING
CLUBHOUSE
RESIDENTIAL PARKING
RESIDENTIAL PARKING
RESIDENTIAL PARKING
RESIDENTIAL PARKING
RETAIL
PUBLIC PARKING
PUBLIC PARKING
SECTION B-B
SCALE: 1" = 50'.{)"
RTU SCREEN \
$ ~80-;::O" CONDO 06
$ SEVENTH FLOOR RTU SCREEN \
+69'-4" CONDO 05
$ SIXTH FLOOR ~I DUPLEX 01 II
+58'-8"
CONDO 04 II II
$ FIFTH FLOOR II FOURTH FLOOR ""
+48'-0" CONDO 03 STOR. CONDO 03 / +37'-4"
$ FOURTH FLOOR ---./ PARKI~~7t~ ""
+37'-4" CONDO 02 STOR, RESIDENTIAL PARKING n
$ THIRD FLOOR PARKING L-3 PARKING L-3 ""
'I" +21"-0" '\. ---./
+26'-8" CONDO 01 STOR. EXISTING +16'.0"
$ SECOND FLOOR '"' PARKING L-2 RESIDENTIAL PARKING BUILDING PARKIN~5tO~ ""
+16'{)" I STOR. 'I" +10"-0' "- ---./
FIRST FLOOR RETAIL I '"' PARKING L-1 PUBLIC PARKING PARKING L-1 MAIN STREET
'I".{)'-!)" "- / -!)'-O" v
WILLE STREET 'I" -2'-4" 1_.. 5.5% SLOPE
~ MECHANICAL II
\
$ ~~~!NG L-LI
RAMP BEYOND
SECTION C-C
SCALE: 1" = 50'.{)"
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
HCDC
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
B
c
A
A
KEY PLAN
N
EB
SCALE: 1" = 200'
~
OKW Architects
..
.
~l~
I I
PROPOSED, eSCAPING. TYP.
NEARLY WILD ROSE
MOOR GRASS I /
ANNABat.I:: HYDRANGEA
I I I
(TIll
. I
STANDARD
PAVERS. TYP.
f-
W
W
c::
f-
CJ)
W
....J
....J
~
en
'I
II
'I
J
WEST
BUILDING
7 STORIES
.IJ
lARGE CURBED '~ -,
PlANTER. TYP.~,
PROPOSED lANDSCAPING, m.,
NEAR1.YWIL.ORose. -
MOOR GRASS *
HICKS YEW *
)
SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = SO'
N
EB
FbJ f
o 25' 50'
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
~ Fl I If /1
~ (~: lC;:
u I I I :.0 , _~l/L._._
. NEARLY WILD ROSE '. . NEARLY WILD ROSE
.MOORG~S . .MOORG~
. HICKS YEW i . HICKS YEW
<::;:0~~~;'Y~ . 01NA8ELLE HYDRANGEA
NORTH BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
"BLUES BAR-
I
1
I i
ISlI
I: Q;, 1
(El PEDESTRIAN
LIGHT, TYP. I
I, Ii I
(El SHADE TREE,
~. II I
(E) PLANTER. TYP.
II II
11\S1i I
CLUB HOUSE
I
:::-;::, j ----
-'~, ~/i
~,_... ,'1
\~'-f.- /<.'./
o l~==- i--FIELDPAVING,
J TYP.
[EXISTING LOCATION
OF BUSSE STREET
_' CURB CUT
Ijl....~.
~I- ~~..
l' i il~c'll !
, ____ RESIDENCE DROP
-r O~f' LO~ING,
, I -9'1.SIDj/EWI Al~ f-.'
II w,
LI I~'
II .1 I t:i
1.\1 Iz
\\jl I ~
!Il:
ill ; en I
TRASH RECEPTACLE.
TYP. Ii I
- BENCH. TYP.
I II I
(2) UTILE LEAF LINDE
SHADE TREES '
! II I
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT,
TYPi II I
STANDARD PAVERS, I
TYP, Ii '
I Ii I
PROPERTY LINE I
, II
1 s..e~ SIDEWAlK
I II '
I II I
) }- ACC. E$SIBLE RAMP, I
v TYP II
~: Jr: (El ~RO$SWAl~ TYPI
:-l>r~11 I
,.' I"
" " '1, I
EAST
BUILDING
6 STORIES
~rl
HCDC
bJi
REPRESENTATIVE PLANT PAlETIE
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SHADE TREES
TllIA CORDATA 'GREENSPIRE'
ACER FREEMANII 'JEFFERSRED' AUTUMN BlAZE
ULMUS AMERICANA 'HOMESTEAD'
EVERGREEN SHRUBS
lITTlELEAF LINDEN
AUTUMN BlAZE FREEMAN MAPLE
HOMESTEAD ELM
BUXUS MICROPHYLLA WINTERGREEN'
JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 'SEA GREEN'
JUNIPERUS SQUAMATA 'BLUE STAR'
TAXUS X MEDIA 'HICKSII'
DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
WINTERGREEN BOXWOOD
SEA GREEN JUNIPER
BLUE STAR JUNIPER
HICKS YEW
EUONYMUS ALATUS 'RUDY HAAG'
HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'ANNABELLE'
RHUS AROMATICA 'GROW-LOW
ROSA 'NEARLY WILD'
ROSA 'CAREFREE WONDER'
SPIRAEA JAPONICA 'MAGIC CARPET
SPIRAEA X 'GOLDMOUND'
SYRINGA PATULA 'MISS KIM'
GRASSES & PERENNiAlS
RUDY HAAG BURNING BUSH
ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA
GROW LOW SUMAC
NEARLY WILD ROSE
CAREFREE WONDER ROSE
MAGIC CARPET SPIREA
GOLDMOUND SPIREA
MISS KIM LILAC
ACHILLEA MILLEFOllUM 'RED BEAUTY'
ALCHEMILLA VULGARIS
EUONYMOUS FORTUNEI 'COLORATUS'
HEMEROCALlIS 'CHICAGO APACHE'
HEMEROCALlIS 'STELLA DE 'ORO'
HEUCHERA 'PALACE PURPLE'
HOSTA 'GOLDEN TIARA'
lIATRIS SPICATA 'KOBOLD'
MOLINA CAERULEA 'STRAHLENQUELLE'
PEROVSKIA ATRIPlICIFOllA 'LONGIN'
RUDBECKIA SPECIOSA VIETTE'S LITTlE SUZV'
SALVIA NEMEROSA 'MAY NIGHT
SEDUM 'AUTUMN JOY'
VERONICA SPICATA 'ROYAl CANDLES'
VINCA MINOR
o
OC:L~
;VD --ACCE~
o lJ ar~~,,::~~
o 0 _______~l: (;) L..-
~Q a ~^"~
r- -- 8'DIAMETER-- DO
PlANTER WITH
, , SEAT WALL. TYP.
<;t~,i~ii~~~~ .,~.... ~ B
:~~~~~C%$'>
.'i1-~ . '-:':-'
&7-, "z":-::z,
IyIQ . <"
'lth;. . ''-:.
'1)->
E. BUSSE AVENUE
KEY PlAN
RED BEAUTY YARROW
LADY'S MANTlE
PURPLE LEAF WINTERCREEPER
CHICAGO APACHE DA YlIL Y
STELLA DE ORO DAYlIL Y
PALACE PURPLE CORAl BELLS
GOLDEN TIARA HOSTA
KOBOLD SPIKE GAYFEATHER
STRAHLENQUELLE MOOR GRASS
LONGIN RUSSIAN SAGE
DWARF ORANGE CONEFLOWER
'MAY NIGHT SAGE
AUTUMN JOY SEDUM
ROYAL CANDLES VERONICA
MYRTLE
=
RIBBON BIKE RACK
BENCH
CAST IRON TREE GRATE
EXISTING TREE GRATE
TRASH RECEPTACLE
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN LIGHT
SHADE TREE
EXISTING SHADE TREE
cfiw
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
~
8
8
@
+
+
o
o
Q't<;N Architects
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
"
,.
I!~U J~ ~o
I / / NORTH-~~BLlC DRIVE
k-1..LJj...II. UJ I kU I
~. %,' ..~ij..1
~ 1 I~;;
,-, I ;1;1
I. W
'~ : ~I
r '''@I
.--/,1 ~~
.
I-
W
W
0:::
I-
(f)
W
....J
....J
~
I
I
I
/
I
I
SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCAlE: 1" . 2S'-()"
.
~EB
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
i (,~DI
1 I
I 1
I Ii
1 1
1 I
I 1
1 1
I
<=u
~> I
II i
\~II
I:;%: I
\ ,I-:
\tlj
\ 0:::;
\~~~:
\ z:
\ _I
I I <(I
(~
II .:
'(f)
I
1
I
I
I
I
?'ill
~-,
,
"
,I
\
II
,I
r-
i
~
\
I)
~
\
III . I)
cfiw
OKW Architects
DA TE: MAY 06, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
,
--
.
KEYNOTES:
CD
o
@
8)
o
@
(j)
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL
LIBRARY
MUNICIPAL PARKING
MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE HALL
METRA PARKING LOT
MIXED USE HOUSINGlRETAlL
PUBLIC PARKING ANALYSIS
RATIO FOR
SPACES " 000 S.F. RETAIl
1. PARKlNG ACCESSIBIUTY WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO SITE
PROJECT PARKING GARAGE 126
NORrnwEST HIGHWAY '0
PVBLIC DRIVE 22
'5ll 5 SPACESl1000 S.F.
2. PARKING ACCESSIBILITY ON ADJACENT STREETS
UETRA LOT ~
:~~':=~S;~~~En1 75
,&. 1
SUBTOTAl 323 10 SPACESl1000 S.F.
RAroFOR
SPACES 31.000 S.F. RETAI.
.. 1 "L"""'''''
VERTICAL flOORS OF VILLAGE GARAGE
METRA LOT. 1 BLOCK 50
VILLAGE GARAGE lEVELS 1--4 307
SUBTOT...... 357 11 SPACE$ll000 S.F.
OTAl ALL SPACES AVAIlABlE he 22 S..o.cES/,OOO s...
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
PARKING ANALYSIS PLAN EB
HCDC
m
OKW Architects
DAn, UAY De, 2001
PROJECT NUMBER 0112-4
.
..,
.
NORTH PUBliC DRIVE
'"
'" ..
! t,
'"
'"
g
0~
10
....
CD
,
KEY PLAN EB
PHOTOGRAPHS OF STUDY MODEL
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
CD
o
HCDC
CD
o
cfiw
OKW Architects
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
.
..
.
AREA SUMMARY
OVERALL SITE AREA
WEST BUILDING
FIRST FLOOR GROSS AREA
SECOND LEVEL STORAGE
SECOND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
PAVILION & WAUWIAY
THIRD FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
FOURTH FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
FIFTH FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
SIXTH FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
SEVENTH FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
TOTAL GROSS AREA
SECOND FLOOR TERRACE
SECOND FLOOR ROOF AREA
FIFTH FLOOR TERRACE
SEVENTH FLOOR TERRACE
TOTAL TERRACE AREA
NORTH BUILDING
LOWER LEVEL PARKING
FIRST LEVEL PARKING
SECOND LEVEL PARKING
THIRD LEVEL PARKING
FOURTH LEVEL PARKING
TOTAL PARKING AREA
FOURTH/FIFTH FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
DUPLEX AREA
CONDO AREA
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL AREA
TOTAL GROSS AREA
FOURTH FLOOR TERRACE
FIFTH FLOOR TERRACE
TOTAL TERRACE AREA
EAST BUILDING
FIRST FLOOR GROSS AREA
SECOND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
THIRD FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
FOURTH FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
FIFTH FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
SIXTH FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
TOTAL GROSS AREA
SECOND FLOOR TERRACE
SIXTH FLOOR TERRACE
TOTAL TERRACE AREA
TOTAL GROSS AREA
+/-86,240 S.F.
23,025 S.F.
2,340 S.F.
12,490 S.F.
3,325 S.F.
12,980 S.F.
13,750 S.F.
14,545 S.F.
14,545 S.F.
13,590 S.F.
110,590 S.F.
1,635 S.F.
5,965 S.F.
830 S.F.
925 S.F.
9,355 S.F.
7,240 S.F.
27,370 S.F.
27,370 S.F.
27,370 S.F.
12,575 S.F.
101,925 S.F.
10,720 S.F.
8,510 S.F.
19,230 S.F.
121,155 S.F.
7,175 S.F.
2,560 S.F.
9,735 S.F.
18,000 S.F.
13,615 S.F.
13,740 S.F.
13,740 S.F.
13,740 S.F.
4,625 S.F.
77,460 S.F.
2,410 S.F.
5,305 S.F.
7,715 S.F.
309,205S.F.
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR.)
GROSS FLOOR ARENSITE AREA = 309,205186,240 S.F.
= 3.58 f'N/O TERRACE)
MOUNT PROSPECT TOWN CENTER
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
HCDC
PROJECT SUMMARY
RETAIL AREA:
WEST BUILDING
EAST BUILDING
TOTAL:
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
CONDOMINIUM UNITS
WEST
BLDG
8
8
9
9
9
~
52
SECOND FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
FOURTH FLOOR
FIFTH FLOOR
SIXTH FLOOR
SEVENTH FLOOR
TOTAL CONDOS
DUPLEX UNITS
17,620 GSF
15,905 GSF
33,525 GSF
+/-31,000 NSF
EAST
BLDG
9
9
8
8
NORTH TOTAL
BLDG UNITS
17
17
5 22
17
9
9
5 91
NORTH TOTAL
BLDG UNITS
6 6
6 6
97
34
FOURTH/FIFTH FLOORS
TOTAL DUPLEX UNITS
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS
GARAGE PARKING
PUBLIC PARKING
LOWER LEVEL
FIRST LEVEL
SECOND LEVEL
TOTAL PUBLIC SPACES
RESIDENTIAL PARKING
SECOND LEVEL
THIRD LEVEL
FOURTH LEVEL
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL SPACES
TOTAL PARKING SPACES
SPACES
29
79
~
126
SPACES
57
83
25
165
291
NOTES
PUBLIC PARKING SPACES PER NET 1000 SF RETAIL
RESIDENTIAL SPACES / UNIT
4.06
1.70
~
OKW Architects
DATE: MAY 6, 2008
PROJECT NUMBER: 07124
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
Mount Prospect
MEMORANDUM
~
FROM:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APRIL 29, 2008
STATE ELEVATOR SAFETY PROGRAM AGREEMENT
-e.. ~:r'>
~4-ce
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Last year the State of Illinois adopted the Elevator Safety Act; this Act regulates the constructio of new
elevators and the annual inspection/enforcement of existing elevators. The Village currently maintains
an elevator inspection program that has been in place for many years. We use Thompson Elevator to
conduct all plan reviews and inspections, and then invoice the costs back to the building owners
through the license program.
In order to maintain our local elevator inspection program, the Village must enter into an agreement
with the State that requires us to comply with the Act; this agreement states that the Village will
administer the now State mandated inspection program, at the local level.
By signing this agreement, the Village is permitted to operate and Elevator Safety Program in
conformity with Section 140 of the Elevator Safety Act (225 ILCS 312/140) and the Administrative Rules
adopted at 41 III. Admin. Code 1000. There will be no changes in local code amendments affecting life
safety issues as required by the Fire Prevention Bureau.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at the May 6th meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this
matter.
w
E
\D:.)....L1rllCl1i~~ ;;md ~',:j~tng~~'.'-J{C':.\(\ncy'I.()..:<:1 S'.:111:1g~.\'rcnlp;.'ln!~'y t"ll.:n~Cl Fili.~~-"()i.l-; J \\i!J rdcnlO !hlJr: v..:.!( .l.'0("
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE OFFICE OF THE STATE
FIRE MARSHAL TO ALLOW THE VILLAGE TO OPERATE AN
ELEVATOR SAFETY PROGRAM
WHEREAS, in 2007 the State of Illinois adopted the Elevator Safety Act, which
regulates the construction of new elevators and the annual inspection and
enforcement of existing elevators; and
WHEREAS, in order to maintain control of the Village's local elevator inspection
program, the Village of Mount Prospect must enter into an agreement with the
Office of the State Fire Marshal (OFSM); and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees believe it would be in the best
interest of the Village of Mount Prospect, residents and businesses to maintain
local authority of its elevator inspection program; and
WHEREAS, said agreement constitutes a contract between the Office of the
State Fire Marshal (OFSM) and the Village of Mount Prospect which permits the
Village to operate an Elevator Safety Program in conformity with Section 140 of
the Elevator Safety Act (225 ILCVS 312/140) and the Administrative Rules
adopted at 41 III. Adm. Code 1000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect are hereby authorized to execute the agreement with the Office
of the State Fire Marshal, a copy of said Agreement is attached and made a part
of this Resolution as Exhibit "A."
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effective from and
after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this 6th, day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H: \C LKO\files\WI N\RES\Auth ag rmelevatorsafetyprogramstatefiremarshallmay2008,. doc
ILLINOIS ELEVATOR SAFETY PROGRAM AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made between the Office of the State Fire Marshal ("OSFM") and the
municipality Or county ("Local Authority") as hereinafter identified.
This Agreement constitutes a contract between the OSFM and Local Authority which
permits the Local Authority to operate an Elevator Safety Program ("Program") in
conformity with Section 140 of the Elevator Safety Act (225 ILCS 312/140) and the
Administrative Rules adopted at 41 III. Adm. Code 1000. In that regard, the Local
Authority agrees to the following:
1. This Agreement will become effective on the date it is accepted by the OSFM.
2. The Local Authority shall submit to the OSFM, along with this Agreement
executed by an officer of the Local Authority, the following information and shall
notify the OSFM in writing of any changes to subsections II A" and liB" thereafter
during the term of this Agreement:
A The name and contact information of its Program administrator.
B. The name and contact information of any third party inspection company
under contract with the Local Authority or the name and license number
of the inspector(s) employed by the Local Authority to perform such
inspections.
C. The number and type of conveyances covered by the Program.
D. The number and type of conveyances NOT covered by the Program, if
any.
3. The Local Authority by signing this Agreement attests to the OSFM that it has
adopted by ordinance or resolution, or will do so within 30 days of the date of its
signature hereto, the following Standards:
A. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME):
1) Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators (ASME A17.1-2005),
A17.1(a)-2005, and A17.1(s)-2005;
2) Guide for Inspection of Elevators, Escalators, and Moving Walks
(ASME17.2-2004);
3) Safety Code for Existing Elevators and Escalators (ASME A17.3-
2005);
4) Safety Standard for Platform Lifts and Stairway Chairlifts (ASME
A 18.1-2005); and
5) Standard for the Qualification of Elevator Inspectors (ASME QEI-
1-2004).
B. American National Standards:
1) Safety Requirements for Personal Hoists and Employee Elevators
(ANSI A10.4-2004).
C. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE):
1) Automated People Mover Standards (ASCE 21-2000).
4. Should the Local Authority desire to amend any of the Standards, the Local
Authority must submit to the OSFM, for approval by the Illinois Elevator Safety
Board ("Board'''), a copy of the amendment and its reason for the change. The
Board shall review the amendment and notify the Local Authority no later than 30
days after the Board meeting at which the variance request is heard of its
approval or denial.
5. With respect to ASME A17.3-2005, Safety Code for Existing Elevators and
Escalators, upgrades required by this Standard must be completed no later than
January 1, 2009 except that upgrades to the hydraulic cylinder system and
firefighter control system must be completed by January 1, 2011.
An Existing Elevator is an elevator contained in a building for which a building
permit was issued prior to the effective date of the Administrative Rules or a
conveyance for which a permit was issued for that conveyance prior to the
effective date of the Administrative Rules adopted in conformance with the
Elevator Safety Act.
6. The Local Authority by signing this Agreement agrees:
A. To operate its Program in compliance with the Elevator Safety Act and
Administrative Rules.
B. To ensure that all inspections and maintenance is performed by
personnel properly licensed by the State and notify the OSFM of any
instances of non-compliance it becomes aware of.
C. To amend its Program within 30 days of receipt of notice from the OSFM
informing them of changes to any form, document, the Standards and/or
rules that affect the Program.
D. To provide to the OSFM by February 15th of each year, an annual report
of the previous calendar year that shall identify:
1) The number and types of Inspections performed during the past
year;
2) The number of certificate of operations issued during the past
year;
3) The number of permits issued for new conveyances during the
past year;
4) A list of conveyances identified by address and State 1.0. number
after conveyance is registered, that were red-tagged or put out-of-
service during the past year;
5) A copy of any report prepared as the result of an elevator accident
that was not reported to the State; and
6) A copy of any amendments to the Program's enabling ordinance
or resolution adopted by the Local Authority.
E. To submit to the OSFM beginning February 15, 2008 and thereafter on
the 15th of each month, the list of conveyances inspected for the previous
month identified by the State 1.0.
F. To maintain for a period of not less than one year, the following records
for inspection by the OSFM:
1) Copies of all inspection reports;
2) Copies of all permits applications;
3) Copies of all permits issued; and
4) Records of the number of Certificates of Operation issued.
G. To submit to the OSFM a copy of each permit issued.
H. To notify the OSFM at least 90 days in advance of the date the Local
Authority elects to discontinue its Program.
I. To require all conveyances in its jurisdiction to register and pay the
associated fee to the OSFM and to put out-of-service and report to the
OSFM the names of the owners of those conveyances that fail to register
within 30 days of determination that the conveyance is not registered.
7. In accordance with the Elevator Safety Act and the Administrative Rules, with the
exception of the registration fees, the fees and procedures for applications,
permits, inspection and enforcement under the Local Authority's Program shall
remain the jurisdiction of the Local Authority and such procedures shall take
precedence over the procedures adopted by the OSFM and Board.
8. Should the Board determine that the Program does not me~t the requirements of
the Elevator Safety Act or the Administrative Rules, the Board shall notify the
Local Authority of the corrective actions needed to bring the Program into
compliance. Should the Local Authority fail to make the corrections, the Board
may, after allowing time for corrective action and after a hearing under Section
160 of the Administrative Rules, withdraw approval of the Program.
9, A copy of the Administrative Rules (41 III. Admin. Code 1000) will be
available at ..http://www.ilaa.aov/commission/icar/admincode/titles.html"
once published.
Local Authority Name
Office of the State Fire Marshal
1035 Stevenson Drive
Springfield, IL 62703
(217) 785-0969
Signature of Officer
Accepted by:
Printed Name
Title
David B. Foreman, Fire Marshal
Address
Date
City/State/Zip
Telephone Number
Date
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM
CHF 08-86
CONTROL NUMBER
FROM:
CHIEF OF POLICE
~. f.:{
S'/I.J oS
TO:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO AMEND VILLAGE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 18.1
DATE: APRIL 25, 2008
ISSUE
Sub-section C(1)(b) of Section 18.1322 of the Mount Prospect Village Code does not specify the
timeframe in which commuters must submit payment for parking in municipal parking lot stalls.
Recommendation
It is staffs' recommendation to clarify the code to reflect the current practice. The attached
amendment to said ordinance will require commuters to make payment immediately after
parking their vehicle in a designated parking stall. The amended language will clarify the
process and allow for efficient parking enforcement.
Attachment
f
~--_..._~..
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18, ENTITLED "TRAFFIC",
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT. ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION 1: Sub-subsection C(1 )(b) of Section 18.1322, entitled "Pay Parking
Zones," of Chapter 18 entitled "Traffic" of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be
amended by deleting Sub-subsection C(1)((b) in its entirety and replacing it with the
following:
b. The deposit of sufficient United States coins, currency or debit card in an
automated pay box immediately after parking shall permit parking for that day
during posted hours for the correspondingly numbered parking space as set
forth in Appendix A, division II of this code.
SECTION 2: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
day of
,2008
Irvana K. Wilks, Village President
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk
AGENDA ITEM
NEW BUSINESS
EXHIBITS G - P
Resolutions authorizing execution of Agreements between the Village of
Mount Prospect and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Sub-
Recipients.
In keeping with the Village's go "green" efforts, only the Resolutions for
the sub-recipients are attached. The Resolutions do include a brief
description of the service(s) provided by the sub-recipient in accordance
with their respective Agreements.
One copy of the standard agreement is also attached for your review.
Anyone wishing to view the individual agreements should contact
the office of the Village Clerk at 847.818.5333.
Thank you.
Ji Please consider the environment.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
Mount Prospect
TO:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
v81'1Q
s, (, ...() ,
~
FROM:
JANET SAEWERT, NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNER
DATE:
APRIL 29, 2008
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS BETWEEN
THE VILLAGE AND CDBG SUB-RECIPIENTS
On October 2, 2007, the Village Board approved the 2008 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Action Plan. This plan includes funding for several public service agencies that provide a
variety of services and programs for the Village's low- and moderate-income residents. Attached,
please find contracts for the agencies listed below and resolutions authorizing the execution of
agreements between the Village of Mount Prospect and these individual agencies:
· CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, Inc. - Child Care Broker Program
· CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, Inc. - Emergency Housing Program
· Children's Advocacy Center
· Greater Wheeling Area Youth Organization - Summer Adventure North
· Greater Wheeling Area Youth Organization - Dream Makers
. Greater Wheeling Area Youth Organization - Summer Adventure South
· Hire Up Job Training
· Journeys From PADS To HOPE, Inc.
· Mount Prospect Mentor Program
· Northwest Center Against Sexual Assault (NW CASA)
· Resources For Community Living
· Search Development Center - Rehab
· Suburban Primary Health Care Council- Access To Care
· WINGS
Please forward this memorandum and attached resolutions to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their May 6, 2008 meeting. Staff will be present at the meeting to answer any
questions related to this matter.
I concur:
l~~l, ~.
William J. Cooney, AI P, Director of Community Development
G-?
H:\ PLAN\ CDBG\ Memos\2008\ Agreements Memo to Board.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND NORTHWEST CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL
ASSAULT (NW CASA)
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that Northwest Center Against Sexual Assault (NW CASA) shall provide sexual
assault counseling and advocacy to child, adolescent and adult victims of rape/sexual abuse to
Mount Prospect residents located within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect;
and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the NW CASA and approved herein, complies with the
requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to benefiting
low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and the NW CASA, a copy of which
Agreement is attached and made a part this Resolution as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBGCASA 2008.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE CEDA NORTHWEST SELF-HELP CENTER
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that the CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center shall provide an emergency housing
and housing counseling program, and a child care subsidy program to assist near homeless and
homeless low and moderate income residents of the Village of Mount Prospect located within
the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the programs proposed by the CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center and approved
herein, complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development
with respect to benefiting low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and the CEDA Northwest Self-Help
Center, for the provision of an Emergency Housing Program, a copy of which Agreement is
attached and made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and the CEDA Northwest Self-Help
Center, for provision of a Child Care Subsidy Program, a copy of which Agreement is attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "B".
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:ICLKOIFILESIWIN\RESICDBGICOBG CEOA SELF HELP 2008.00C
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that Children's Advocacy Center, shall provide immediate support and crisis
intervention to child victims of sexual assault and their families, who are residents of Mount
Prospect located within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Children's Advocacy Center and approved herein,
complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with
respect to benefiting low and moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and Children's Advocacy Center, a
copy of which Agreement is attached and made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG Children's Advocacy 2008.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE GREATER WHEELING AREA YOUTH OUTREACH, INC.
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect that the Greater Wheeling Area Youth Outreach, Inc. shall provide summer programs and
after school tutoring activities that include educational and recreational activities for youth located
within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Greater Wheeling Area Youth Outreach, Inc. and
approved herein, complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development with respect to benefiting low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to attest
his signature on agreements for Community Development Block Grant implementation, which
Agreements are between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Greater Wheeling Area Youth
Outreach, Inc., for the provisions of summer camps for (A) School District 26 and (B) School
District 59, respectively, a copy of which Agreements are attached and made a part of this
Resolution as Exhibits "A" and "B".
SECTION TWO: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to attest
his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation, which
Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Greater Wheeling Area Youth
Outreach, Inc., for the provision of an after school tutoring and mentoring program, a copy of which
Agreement is attached and made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit "C".
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
ATTEST:
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG Wheeling Area Youth 2008.doc
H,\CLKO\FILES\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG WHEELING AREA YOUTH 2008.DOC
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND HIRE UP MINISTRIES
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that Hire Up Ministries provides job training and mentoring to Mount Prospect
residents located within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the project proposed by Hire Up Ministries and approved herein, complies with the
requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to benefiting
low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and Hire Up Ministries, a copy of
which Agreement is attached and made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG hireupministries 2008.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND JOURNEYS FROM PADS TO HOPE, INC.
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that Journeys from PADS to HOPE shall provide case management services,
preventative services, follow-up, advocacy, transportation, housing and food vouchers,
emergency medical referral and vouchers, housing location inspection, job preparation,
employment services, and clothing and food pantry resources for the homeless and near
homeless population of the Village of Mount Prospect located within the corporate limits of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the project proposed by Journeys from PADS to HOPE, Inc. and approved herein,
complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with
respect to benefiting low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and Journeys from PADS to HOPE,
Inc., a copy of which Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part of this Resolution
as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG Journeys from Pads to Hope 2008.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY LIVING
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that the Resource Center for Community Living shall provide a program that
includes housing options and support services to individuals with developmental and/or physical
disabilities located within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Resource Center for Community Living and approved
herein, complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development
with respect to benefiting low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Resource Center for
Community Living, a copy of which Agreement is attached and made a part of this Resolution
as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG resourse for community living 2008.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND SEARCH DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that Search Developmental Center provides group homes for adults with
disabilities to Mount Prospect residents located within the corporate limits of Mount Prospect;
and
WHEREAS, the project proposed by the Search Developmental Center and approved herein,
complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with
respect to benefiting low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and Search Developmental Center,
to rehabilitate a group home located in Mount Prospect. A copy of which Agreement is attached
and made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG search developmental center 2008.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL,
INC FOR THE ACCESS TO CARE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that the Suburban Primary Health Care Council, Inc. shall provide a program to
facilitate access to primary health care in the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect;
and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Suburban Primary Health Care Council, Inc. and
approved herein, complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development with respect to benefiting low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and Suburban Primary Health Care
Council, Inc, a copy of which Agreement is attached and made a part of this Resolution as
Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG access to care 2008.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND WINGS PROGRAM, INC.
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that WINGS Program, Inc. shall provide a transitional living program for women
and their children who are homeless or near homeless residents of the of the Village of Mount
Prospect located within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the WINGS Program, Inc. and approved herein, complies
with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to
benefiting low/moderate-income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk directed to
attest his signature on an agreement for Community Development Block Grant implementation,
which Agreement is between the Village of Mount Prospect and the WINGS Program, Inc., for
the provision of a transitional housing program, a copy of which Agreement is attached and
made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by the law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this th day of May 2008.
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\CDBG\CDBG wings 2008.doc
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND
NORTHWEST CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AS SAUL T (NW CASA)
FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT, entered this day of , 2008, by and
between the Village of Mount Prospect (herein referred to as the "Grantee") and The
Northwest Center Against Sexual Assault (NW CASA) (herein referred to as the "Sub-
Recipient").
WHEREAS, the Grantee has applied for and received Community Development Block Grant
(herein referred to as "CDBG") funds from the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development (herein referred to HUD) under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, Public Law 93-383; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee wishes to engage the Sub-Recipient to assist the Grantee in utilizing
such funds
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties hereto that;
I. SCOPE OF SERVICE
A. Activities
The Sub-Recipient will be responsible for administering a CDBG Year (2008)
program in a manner satisfactory to the Grantee and consistent with any standards
required as a condition of providing these funds. This program will include the
following activities eligible under the CDBG program.
The Grantee elects to contract for services with the Sub-Recipient for operation of a
program to provide sexual assault counseling and advocacy to child, adolescent
and adult victims of rape/sexual abuse as outlined in the Scope of Services attached
herewith as Exhibit A.
B. National Objectives
The Sub-Recipient certifies that the activities carried out with funds provided under
this Agreement will meet one or more of the CDBG program's National Objectives as
defined in 24 CRF Part 570.208:
1. Benefit Low/Moderate Income Persons;
2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or
3. Meet a need having a particular urgency/emergency.
C. Levels of Accomplishment
In addition to the normal administrative services required as part of this Agreement,
the Sub-Recipient agrees to provide the following levels of program services:
Average Clients/Month
1.25/MONTH
Total Clients/Year
15/YEAR
The sub-recipient will also report information as it relates to the Outcome
Measurement System as described in Federal Register Notice on June 10, 2005. Such
information includes, but is not limited to: funds leveraged, number of persons with
access to newlimproved access to a service, and number of beds created in an
overnight/emergency shelter.
D. Performance Monitoring
The Grantee will monitor the performance of the Sub-Recipient against goals and
performance standards required herein. Substandard performance as determined by
the Grantee will constitute non-compliance with this Agreement. If action to correct
such substandard performance is not taken by the Sub-Recipient within a reasonable
period of time after being notified by the Grantee, contract suspension or termination
procedures will be initiated.
II. TIME PERFORMANCE
Services of the Sub-Recipient shall start on January 1, 2008 and end on December
31, 2008. The term of this Agreement and the provisions herein shall be extended to
cover any additional time period during which the Sub-Recipient remains in control of
CDBG funds or other assets, including program income.
III. PAYMENT
It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the Grantee
under this contract shall not exceed $3,000. Payments may be contingent upon
certification of the Sub-Recipient's financial management system in accordance with
the standards specified in OMB Circular A-I 10 Attachment F.
2
A. Payment Procedures
The Grantee will pay to the Sub-Recipient funds available under this contract based
upon information submitted by the Sub-Recipient and consistent with any approved
budget and Grantee policy concerning payments. The Grantee will not process any
invoices received until the Sub-Recipient submits a monthly, quarterly or seasonal
report (depending on the reporting system the Sub-Recipient has decided to use) for
the requested pay period. The Grantee will determine the appropriate amount to
allocate per reporting period depending on the Levels of Accomplishment achieved by
the Sub-Recipient. With the exception of certain advances, payments will be made for
eligible expenses actually incurred by the Sub-Recipient, and not to exceed actual cash
requirements. Payments will be adjusted by the Grantee in accordance with advance
fund and program income balances available in Sub-Recipient accounts. In addition,
the Grantee reserves the right to liquidate funds available under this contract for costs
incurred by the Grantee on behalf of the Sub-Recipient.
B. Indirect Costs
If indirect costs are charged, the Sub-Recipient will develop an indirect cost allocation
plan for determining the appropriate Sub-Recipient's share of administrative costs and
shall submit such plan to the Grantee for approval, in a form specified by the Grantee.
C. Program Income
The Sub-Recipient shall report all program income as defined at 24 CFR 570.500(a)
generated by activities carried out with CDBG funds made available under the
contract. The use of program income by the Sub-Recipient shall comply with the
requirements set forth at 24 CFR 570.504. By way of further limitations, the Sub-
Recipient may use such income during the contract period for activities permitted
under this contract and shall reduce requests for additional funds by the amount of any
such program income balances on hand. All unused program income shall be returned
to the Guarantee at the end of the contract period. Any interest earned on cash
advances from the U.S. Treasury is not program income but needs to be remitted
promptly to the Grantee.
IV. REPORTING
A. Progress Reports
3
The Sub-Recipient shall submit a Quarterly Report to the Grantee in the form,
content, and frequency as required by the Grantee. All reports will be due 15 days
after the close of the reporting period. This report should include the following:
1. Each client served during the month using CDBG funds;
2. Client's address; and
3. Type of service used by that client.
B. Final Report
A final report shall accompany the Sub-Recipient's final billing. This report will
highlight the accomplishments of the program for the fiscal year, from January 1, 2008
to December 31, 2008, summarize the number of Mount Prospect residents served and
include the completion of Exhibit B, herein attached. This report shall be due no later
than January 15,2009.
C. Submission to HUD
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the Grantee shall file all necessary
documents with HUD and shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations
necessary to facilitate acquisition of funds approved for this program by HUD. The
Sub-Recipient shall not file any lawsuit against the Grantee or any of its officers or
employees as a result of this contract, except that this Section shall not act as a bar to
any lawsuits arising from the negligent acts of the Grantee or any of its officers and
employees.
V. NOTICES & COMMUNICATIONS
Notices and communications under this Agreement shall be sent registered or certified
mail postage prepaid to the respective parties as follows:
Grantee
Sub- Recipient
Mr. William J. Cooney, Jr.
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
(847) 818-5328
Fax: (847) 818-5329
Elsie Mills
Executive Director
NW Center Against Sexual Assault
415 W. Golf Road
Arlington Heights, IL 60005
(847) 806-6526
4
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. General Compliance
The Sub-Recipient agrees to comply with the requirements of Title 24 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 570 (the HUD regulations concerning CDBG). The Sub-
Recipient further agrees to utilize funds available under this Agreement to supplement
rater than supplant funds otherwise available.
The Sub-Recipient shall, at all times, observe and comply with all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government which may in any
manner affect the performance of this Agreement, and the Sub-Recipient shall be
required to perform all acts under this agreement in the same manner as the Grantee,
as a contractor of the Federal Government, is or would be required to perform such
acts. Suspension or termination shall occur if the Sub-Recipient materially fails to
comply with any term of the award in accordance with 24 CFR 85.44.
B. "Independent Contractor"
Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended to, or shall be construed in any
manner, as creating or establishing the relationship of employer/employee between the
parities. The Sub-Recipient shall at all times remain an "independent contractor" with
respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement. The Grantee shall be
exempt from payment of all Unemployment Compensation, FICA, retirement, life
and/or medical insurance and Workers' Compensation Insurance as the Sub-Recipient
is an independent Sub-Recipient.
C. Hold Harmless
The Sub-Recipient shall hold harmless, save and indemnify the Grantee and each and
everyone of its officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, insurers and
successors from any and all claims, demands, causes of actions, expenses, injuries,
losses or damages of whatever kind, character of description the Grantee may suffer as
a result of any cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the Sub-Recipient's
performance or non-performance, or those acting under it to conform to the statues,
ordinances or other regulations or requirements of any governmental authority, in
connection with e the Sub-Recipient's performance under this Agreement. The Sub-
Recipient agrees to defend any claims brought or actions filed against the Grantee with
respect to the subject of the indemnity contained herein, whether such claims or
actions are rightfully or wrongfully brought or files. In case of such a claim brought
or such an action files, the Grantee agrees that the Sub-Recipient may employ
5
attorneys of its own selection to appear and defend the claim or action on behalf of the
Grantee, subject to reasonable approval by the Grantee, at the expense of the Sub-
Recipient. The Sub-Recipient, at its option, shall have the sole authority for the
direction of the defense.
D. Amendments
The Grantee or Sub-Recipient may amend this Agreement at any time provided that
such amendments make specific reference to this Agreement, and are executed in
writing, signed by a duly authorized representative of both organizations, and
approved by the Grantee's governing body. Such amendments shall not invalidate this
Agreement, nor relieve or release the Grantee or Sub-Recipient from its obligations
under this Agreement
The Grantee may, in its discretion, amend this Agreement to conform with Federal,
state or local governmental guidelines, policies and available funding amounts, or for
other reasons. If such amendments result in a change in the funding, the scope of
services, or schedule of the activities to be undertaken as part of this Agreement, such
modifications will be incorporated only by written amendment signed by both Grantee
and Sub-Recipient.
E. Suspension or Termination
Either party may terminate this contract at any time by giving written notice to the
other party of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least 30
days before the effective date of such termination. Partial terminations of the Scope of
Service in Section I, A above may only be undertaken with the prior approval of the
Grantee. In the event of any termination for convenience, all finished or unfinished
documents, data, studies, surveys, maps, models, photographs, reports or other
materials prepared by the Sub-Recipient under this Agreement shall, at the option of
the Grantee, become the property of the Grantee, and the Sub-Recipient shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents or materials prior to the termination.
The Grantee may also suspend or terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, if the
Sub-Recipient materially fails to comply with any term of this Agreement, or with any
of the rules, regulations or provisions referred to herein; and the Grantee may declare
the Sub-Recipient ineligible for any further participation in the Grantee's contracts, in
addition to other remedies as provided by the law. In the event there is probable cause
to believe the Sub-Recipient is in non-compliance with any applicable rules or
regulations, the Grantee may withhold up to fifteen (15) percent of said contract funds
until such time as the Sub-Recipient is found to be in compliance by the Grantee, or is
otherwise adjudicated to be in compliance.
6
VII. ADMINISTRA TIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Financial Management
1. Accounting Standards
The Sub-Recipient agrees to comply with Attachment F of OMB Circular A-
110 and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required
therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source
documentation for all costs incurred.
2. Cost Principles
The Sub-Recipient shall administer its program in conformance with OMB
Circulars A-I22, "Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations or A-21 "Cost
Principles for Educational Institutions," as applicable. These principles shall
be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.
OMB Circular A-I22 is included as Exhibit D.
B. Documentation and Record-Keeping
1. Records to be Maintained
The Sub-Recipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal
regulations specified in 24 CFR Part 570.506, that are pertinent to the activities
to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall not include but not be
limited to:
a. Records providing a full description of each activity
undertaken;
b. Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one
of the National Objectives of the CDBG program;
c. Records required to determine the eligibility of activities;
d. Records required to document the acquisition, improvement,
use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with
CDBG assistance;
e. Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and
equal opportunity components of the CDBG program;
f. Financial records as required by 24 CFR Part 570.502, and
OMB Circular A-II 0; and
g. Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart
K of24 CFR 570.
7
Said records shall include verification of household income and information on
race/national origin and ethnicity. Eligible households for this program must
have income below those noted in Exhibit C. The Sub-Recipient may establish
program income criteria below that noted in Exhibit C.
2. Income Eligibility
The Sub-Recipient shall utilize annual income in determining and documenting
income for participating clients. Annual income is the gross amount of income
anticipated by all adults in a family during the 12 months following the
effective date of determination. To calculate annual income, the Sub-Recipient
may choose one (1) of three (3) definitions of income listed below:
1. Annual income as defined under the Section 8 Housing Assistance
Payments Program;
2. Adjusted gross income as defined for purposes of reporting under
IRS Form 1040 (long form) for Federal individual income tax
purposes; or
3. Annual income as defined for reporting under the Census long form
for the most rent available decennial Census.
Any use of another income format is considered ineligible for HUD and
CDBG funding. Please note that grantees must ensure that applicants to their
programs and activities are treated equitably. For this reason, the same income
definition must be used throughout the activity for each applicant.
Additionally, the Sub-Recipient shall maintain copies of any documents used
to determine client's income.
3. Retention
The Sub-Recipient shall retain all records pertinent to expenditures incurred
under this contract for a period of five (5) years after the termination of all
activities funded under this Agreement. Records for non-expendable property
acquired with funds under this contract shall be retained for five (5) years after
final disposition of such property. Notwithstanding the above, if there are
claims, litigation, audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any of the
records cited that have started before the expiration of the three-year period,
then such records must be retained until completion of the actions and
resolution of all issues, or the expiration of the three-year period, whichever
occurs later.
4. Client Data
8
The Sub-Recipient shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for
services provided. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name,
address, income level or other basis for determining eligibility, and description
of service provided. Such information shall be made available to Grantee
monitors or their designees for review upon request.
5. Disclosure
The Sub-Recipient understands that client information collected under this
contract is private. The use or disclosure of such information, when not
directly connected with the administration of the Grantee's or Sub-Recipient's
responsibilities with respect to services provided under this contract, is
prohibited, unless written consent is obtained from such person receiving
service and, in the case of a minor, that of a responsible parent/guardian.
6. Property Records
The Sub-Recipient shall maintain a real property inventory, which identifies
properties purchased, improved or sold using CDBG funds. Properties
retained shall continue to meet eligibility criteria and shall conform with the
"changes in use" restrictions specified in 24 CFR Parts 570.503(b )(8), as
applicable.
7. Close-Outs
The Sub-Recipient's obligation to the Grantee shall not end until all close-out
requirements are completed. Activities during this close-out period shall
include, but are not limited to: making final payments, disposing of program
assets (including the return of unused materials, equipment, unspent cash
advances, program income balances, and accounts receivable to the Grantee),
and determining the custodianship of records.
8. Audits & Inspections
All Sub-Recipient records with respect to any matters covered by this
Agreement shall be made available to the Grantee, grantor agency, their
designees or the Federal Government, at any time during normal business
hours, as often as the Grantee or grantor agency deems necessary, to audit,
examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. Any
deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the Sub-Recipient
with 30 days after receipt by the Sub-Recipient. Failure of the Sub-Recipient
to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this
contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The Sub-
Recipient hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in
9
accordance with current Grantee policy concerning Sub-Recipient audits and,
as applicable OMB Circular A-I33.
9. Availability of Law, Regulations and Orders
The Grantee shall, upon the request of the Sub-Recipient, provide copies of all
laws, regulations and orders, including those cited in this contract which
regulate operation of the CDBG-funded programs, or which might otherwise
affect the performance of this Agreement. This Agreement include program
income requirements (See Section V, C, 1: Program Income.) set forth in
section 24 CFR 570.504 (c) but is not applicable to the Sub-Recipient and
uniform administrative requirements described in section 24 CFR 570.502.
C. Procurement
1. Compliance
The Sub-Recipient shall comply with current Grantee policy concerning the
purchase of equipment and shall maintain inventory records of all non-
expendable personal property as defined by such policy as may be procured
with funds provided herein. All program assets (unexpended program income,
property, equipment, etc.) shall revert to the Grantee upon termination of this
contract.
2. OMB Standards
The Sub-Recipient shall procure all materials, property, or services in
accordance with the requirements of Attachment 0 of OMB Circular A-II 0,
Procurement Standards, and shall subsequently follow Attachment N, Property
Management Standards as modified by 24 CFR 570.502(b)(6), covering
utilization and disposal of property.
3. Travel
The Sub-Recipient shall obtain written approval from the Grantee for any
travel outside the metropolitan area with funds provided under this contract.
VIII. PERSONNEL & PARTICIPANT CONDITIONS
A. Civil Rights
1. Compliance
10
The Sub-Recipient agrees to comply with the Illinois Human Rights Act (Act
7751LCS 5-1-101 et seq.) and with Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968
as amended, Section 1 04(b) and Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 as amended, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the
Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Executive Order 11063, and with Executive
Order 11246 as amended by Executive Orders 11375 and 12086.
2. Nondiscrimination
The Sub-Recipient shall not discriminate against any worker, employee,
applicant for employment or any member of the public because of race, color,
creed, religion ancestry, national origin, sex, disability or other handicap, age,
marital/familial status, or status with regard to public assistance. Such
affirmative action shall include, but not be limited to the following:
employment, upgrading demotion or transfer, termination, compensation, and
selection for training including apprenticeship. The Sub-Recipient agrees to
post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for
employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this non-discriminatory
clause. This policy of non-discrimination and affirmative action shall be
applicable with regard to both the Sub-Recipient's internal personnel practices
and its actions in the performance of this Agreement. The Sub-Recipient
hereby certifies that 1-9 forms are current and employment verification has
been completed regarding all employees. The Sub-Recipient agrees and
authorizes the Grantee and HUD to conduct compliance reviews or any other
procedures to assure compliance with these provisions, subject to applicable
laws and regulations concerning privacy and reasonable notice to the Sub-
Recipient.
B. Conduct
1. Assignments
The Sub-Recipient shall not assign the Agreement or any part thereof and the
Sub-Recipient shall not transfer or assign any funds or claims due or to be
come due hereunder without the prior written approval of the Village Manager.
Any transfer or assignment of funds pursuant to this agreement, either in whole
or in part, or any interest therein shall be due to the Sub-Recipient shall be
deemed of no force or effect and shall not be binding upon the Grantee.
2. Prohibited Activity
11
The Sub-Recipient is prohibited from using funds provided herein or personnel
employed in the administration of the program for political activities: sectarian
or religious activities; lobbying, political patronage, and nepotism activities
3. Conflict of Interest
The Sub-Recipient agrees to abide by the provisions of 24 CFR 570.611 with
respect to conflicts of interest, and covenants that it presently has no financial
interest and shall not acquire any financial interest, direct or indirect, which
would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services
required under the Agreement. The Sub-Recipient further covenants that in the
performance of this Agreement no person having such a financial interest shall
be employed or retained by the Sub-Recipient hereunder. These conflict of
interest provisions apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant,
officer or elected official or appointed official of the Grantee, or of any
designated public agencies or Sub-Recipients which are receiving funds under
the CDBG Entitlement Program.
4. Lobbying
The Sub-Recipient hereby certifies that:
a. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by
or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any
Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of
any Federal loan, the entering into any cooperative agreement, and
the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification
of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement;
b. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid
or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,
grant, loan or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit
Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in
accordance with its instructions;
c. It will require that the language of paragraph (d) of this
certification be included in the award documents for all subawards
at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under
12
grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all Sub-
Recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly; and
d. Lobbying Certification - Paragraph d
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which
reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered
into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31,
U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification
shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not
more than $100,000 for each such failure.
5. Religious Organizations
The Sub-Recipient agrees that funds provided under this contract will not be
utilized for religious activities to promote religious interests, or for the benefit
of a religious organization in accordance with the Federal regulations specified
in 24 CR 570.2000).
6. Reversion of Assets
Upon expiration of this Agreement, the Sub-recipient shall transfer to the
Village any COBG funds on hand at the time of expiration and any accounts
receivable attributable to the use of COBG funds. Any real property under the
Sub-recipient's control that was acquired or improved in whole or in part with
COBG funds (including COBG funds provided to the sub-recipient in the form
of a loan) in excess of $25,000 shall either:
a. Be used to meet one of the national objectives in Section
570.208 (formerly Section 570.901) of the COBG regulations until five
years after expiration of the Agreement; or
b. If the real property is not used in accordance with paragraph 6a
above, the Sub-recipient shall pay to the Village an amount equal to the
current market value of the property less any portion of the value
attributable to expenditures of non-COBG funds for the acquisition of,
or improvement to, the property. The payment is program income to
the Village. No payment is required after the period of time specified
in paragraph 6a of this section.
IX. SEVERABILITY
13
If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement
shall not be affected thereby, and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless
be in full force and effect.
14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this contract:
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BY:
Mayor
ATTEST:
J
Village Clerk
NW CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT
BY:
Executive Director
Notary Public
15
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: APRIL 29, 2008
SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE PURCHASE OR CONDEMNA N OF
PARCEL OF LAND (PROPERTY INDEX NUMBER 08-12-107-021) AT 108 S.
STREET
Attached to this memorandum is an Ordinance that would authorize the Village to purchase or
condemn the property located at 108 S. Main Street. This property comprises the western half of the
Village-owned public parking lot located at the southwest corner of Main Street and Busse Avenue in
the small triangle redevelopment area.
The property was donated to the Village in 1969 by George L. Busse to allow for the construction of a
public parking lot. The Trustee's Deed that transferred ownership of the lot to the Village contained a
reversionary clause that returns ownership of the property to the original owner at such time that the
property ceases to be used by the Village for a public parking lot. Given that the pending
redevelopment of the small triangle does not utilize this parcel for public parking, it is in the best interest
of the Village to pursue the outright purchase of this land at this time.
Please forward this memorandum and attached Ordinance to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their May 6th meeting. Staff will be at that meeting to answer any questions related to
this matter.
ICP
G
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF
PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE IN
THE TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPEMENT PROJECT AREA
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois has heretofore
adopted Ordinance Number 3554 adopting the District No. 1 Tax Increment
Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, and Ordinance Number 3555 entitled
"An Ordinance Designating District No.1 Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area in
the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois", and Ordinance Number 3556 entitled "An
Ordinance Adopting Tax Increment Financing for the District No. 1 Tax Increment
Redevelopment Project in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois all of which are
incorporated herein in their entirety.
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has determined that the above-mentioned
Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project which were the subject
matter of the public hearings is in the best interests of the residents of the Village of
Mount Prospect and is a public purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is empowered, pursuant to the Real Property
Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, PISI 79-1525, appearing as Section 11-
74.4-1 et. seq., of Chapter 65, Illinois Compiled Statutes 2003, (hereinafter the "Act") to
acquire by purchase, donation, lease or eminent domain real property within the
redevelopment project area; and
WHEREAS, the implementation of the aforementioned Tax Increment Redevelopment
Plan and Project would attract to the Village of Mount Prospect additional commercial
ventures, increase business for commercial ventures currently established within the
Village, strengthen the property and non-property tax and income bases, and would
provide jobs for the Village residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COUNTY OF
COOK, STATE OF ILLINOIS, as follows:
SECTION 1: That it is hereby determined that the Tax Increment
Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project previously adopted be established,
maintained, controlled, managed and operated within the corporate limits of the Village
of Mount Prospect within the District Number 1 Tax Increment Redevelopment Project
Area as described in Ordinance Nos. 3554, 3555 and 3556 and that said Tax Increment
Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project be occupied, improved, used and
developed in a manner necessary and convenient for public use.
SECTION 2: That under the authority vested in the corporate authorities of the
Village of Mount Prospect, through the statutes of the State of Illinois and the home rule
power and ordinances of the Village, it is hereby determined that pursuant to the Tax
Increment Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project it is necessary and desirable
that the Village shall acquire title to and possession of certain real property commonly
known as 108 South Main Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois, Permanent Index 08-12-107-
021, and legally described in the Exhibit which is attached hereto and made a part hereof
and hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property", which property is within the
foregoing Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area and is necessary, required and
needed to achieve the objectives of the foregoing Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and
Redevelopment Project, and which property lies wholly within the limits of the Village of
Mount Prospect.
SECTION 3: That the Village Attorney or such other persons as he may
designate are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate personally or
through its representatives for and on behalf of said Village with the owner or owners of
the Subject Property for the purchase and acquisition thereof by said Village.
SECTION 4: That in the event the said Village Attorney or his designee are
unable to agree with the owner or owners of said real property as to the compensation
thereof, then title to and possession of the Subject Property shall be acquired by the
Village of Mount Prospect through condemnation, and authorization is hereby given to
institute proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction to acquire title to and
possession of the Subject Property for the Village in accordance with the Act, the
eminent domain laws of the State of Illinois and the ordinances of the Village of Mount
Prospect.
SECTION 5: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
Passed by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois and
approved by the President thereof this 6th day of May, 2008.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Approved
Mayor Irvana K. Wilks
Attest
M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk
H .\rl .K O\fiI,,<\ WIN\OROIN A Nr\r()ntl,.mn"ti()nnrtlin"n~,.l Oll.m";nm,,,,')OOll <ln~
I.
..... c.... ..4...:.:,_.__.......
CORPORATE SUBDIVISION SURVEY
.~
i I
.5C/9tc.. / //V{"# '= 50 FeeT
J1( gU.55 E /II/C.
,7'c.{'t:":T,;?/".7..eE PC"P/O'7'7'"c.o
.,
. . - ...
'~_..' ~..' .a.;" ,_ ~
~ ~ ~
I\:
~ ~ \s)
"
~
50.0 'Ii
~
$0.0 ,..
'" ~
\.
IS
~
I ...;J ~ ~
0- ~
.~
. '"
I .~
~.J' ~
t~
I :i:~ \t)
'",
i.:.,
"::i
.
r-4-
!'~::
>';"
. ~:;. .:0""4 \~ ./J'" i .../...')/ ~'...~;.
" .
.....,