Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0757_001Minutes 1 ♦A: clip_ April 28, 1992 Roll Call The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Gerald L. Farley. Trustees present included Mark Busse, Tim Corcoran, Leo Floros, Paul Hoefert, and Irvana Wilks. Trustee George Clowes was absent. Also present were Village Manager John Fulton Dixon, Planning Director David Clements, Public Works Director Herbert L. Weeks, Finance Director David Jepson, approximately 30 members of the Project P.E.O.P.L.E. group from River Trails Junior HIgh School, six Village residents and four members of the print media. Additionally, Fred Borich and Naros Statkus of Donohue, Don Weibel, Chairman of the Plan Commission and Hal Predovich, Chairman of BDDRC were in attendance. The minutes were accepted with the following correction on page 3, Item VI, the fourth paragraph: Trustee Wilks made a motion that the building be called the Robgrt D. Tiechert Police and Fire Facility rather than the Robert B. Tiechert Police and Fire Facility. No citizens appeared before the Committee. O .. Mayor Farley read a Proclamation recognizing Project P.E.O.P.I-E. (People Educating Other People for a Long-lasting Environment) which was created by Diana Feingold and her 6th grade class at River Trails Junior High School. Project P.E.O.P.L.E. was created by Ms. Feingold and her students who realized that people need to be more aware of Earth's manmade problems, possible solutions, and each person's responsibility for putting those solutions into practice on a daily basis. The group has been honored by President Bush on two occasions and currently there are 17 grass roots groups with over 1,000 members throughout the world. Ms. Feingold was joined by Holly Johnson, President of Project P.E.O.P.L.E. who stated that all Village residents and businesses need to support and follow the lead of these students. Village Manager Dixon stated that a tree will be planted at River Trails Junior High School as a monument to the Project P.E.O.P.L.E. group. Planning Director Clements stated that the update of the Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed by the Plan Commission and recommended by a vote of 7 - 0. This update revises the 1981 Comprehensive Plan which had been previously updated in 1988. Some of the features of the current update include incorporating more current information and new policy statements into the plan. Some of the highlights Mr. Clements pointed out include the following: A. On pages 12 and 52 language has been added to include housing goals identified in the Village's new Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, which has been sent to and approved by HUD. B. A recommendation on page 13 that a public facility's plan 'be prepared for unimproved areas that have been annexed by the Village. C. Added language on pages 15 and 57 that would encourage the implementation of the 2010 Regional Transportation Plan in Mount Prospect. This would include commuter facilities for the Wisconsin Central Railroad. D. A section on page 18 identifies special neighborhoods that may qualify for Community Development Block Grant funded projects under certain conditions. E. In the Downtown Section of the Plan, several revisions are proposed. On page 26, a statement concerning relocating the commuter station further east has been deleted, as is a statement on a future grade crossing at Maple Street. F. On page 27, a multi -family designation for the east side of Maple Street, across from the bank, has been deleted. This area will be shown as single family on the land - use map. G. Pages 28, 29 and 30 include an update on the Tax Increment Finance District and Triangle Redevelopment Area. Also, the Objective and Design Guidelines approved by the Village Board and B.D.D.R.C. are being added to the Plan. H. The transportation section, on page 37, identifies the intersection of Rand Road, Kensington and Elmhurst Roads as a problem intersection. I. A recommendation on pages 37 and 39 that Busse Road from Golf to Central be upgraded. Also, the zoning section on page 48 has been eliminated and a new sentence added that the Zoning Ordinance is now being updated. J. Page 57 begins a section on development and redevelopment sites. Most of the items being deleted are previously vacant parcels that are now developed. Mayor Farley stated that the Comprehensive Plan was a substantial document and it was not the intention of the Committee to cover the entire document in one meeting. He added that the elements that affect the downtown area will be reviewed by the Business Downtown Development and Redevelopment Commission (BDDRC) for their input. 9 Mario Venticinque, 10 South Maple Street, said he was concerned about the effect of the Plan on his property value. Dawn O'Malley, 20 South Maple Street, Patty Maro, 109 South Maple Street, and Rob Campbell, 5 South Maple Street, each said they were concerned with South Maple Street being designated as commercial on the West side of the street and multi -family on the East side of Maple Street. Planning Director Clements said the revision would change the designation on the East side of Maple to single family. Don Weibel, Chairman of the Plan Commission, said the Plan Commission asked BDDRC for their input and incorporated some of their recommendations into the revised Plan. Mr. Weibel said the Plan Commission did not agree with BDDRC regarding a proposed Maple Street railroad crossing and maintaining the East side of Maple Street as multi -family. Hal Predovich, Chairman of BDDRC, said they had not received copies of the changes and that they would give their input in a forthright fashion. The Trustees reviewed the document on a page -by -page basis and made various recommenda- tions regarding the stated objectives and certain grammatical changes. Trustee Corcoran said he would like to see a 5 year plan for the development of all Village assets and that an objective regarding property tax incentives should be included. The Committee went through page 24 and agreed to continue their review on May 12, 1992. VI Mount, Proapect _Ppfigg and Fire HeadQuarters Update Village Manager Dixon presented a list of modifications and changes that were requested for the Mount Prospect Police and Fire Headquarters. The changes were presented in four separate schedules: Schedule I included changes that were approved by Project Coordinator Herb Weeks because of unforeseen construction problems and to keep the project on schedule. The changes totaled $70,428 of which $19,424 had been previously approved by the Village Board. Schedule II included changes that were required to comply with building codes. The total amounted to $23,312. Schedule III includes upgrades and modifications requested by the Police Chief and Fire Chief and recommended by the Village Manager. The schedule separated the requests into changes that would lower maintenance costs, changes that would improve operational efficiency and changes that would improve aesthetics. The schedule also included additional engineering fees because of the changes. The total of these changes is $154,179. Schedule IV included upgrades requested by the Police and Fire Departments that were not recommended by the Village Manager. The total of this schedule is $187,461. The Committee concurred with the recommendations of the Village Manager. Fred Borich, Project Engineer, stated that the project was 20% complete and that he expected the building to be completed by May or June 1993. No report was presented. Trustee Hoefert asked for an update on the Melas Park Improvements. Trustee Busse thanked the Village Manager and Public Works Director for the resolution of the traffic signal on Wolf Road and asked that the Kensington Business Center Owners Association be informed about the progress. Trustee Floros said he was concerned about the increase in personnel costs in the SWANCC budget and would like an explanation. He also said he was concerned that decisions of the Sign Review Board are often being, made by only two people. Additionally, he said that the Village Hall should be identified by some type of signage. IX Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, David C. Jepson, Finance Director DCJ/sm 06/011, 64 eAjo �`55 1438 MT. PRSPCT. fK. D.Ef Mt. Prospect Park District 411 South maoie & Mt Prospect,160056 * (708) 255-5380 May 1, 199-'2 Mr. John Dixon, Village Manager VILLOGE OF MT. PROSPECT 100 S. Emerson Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 Dear John; Attached is the letter and s4'gn in sheet f. --Din our focl.(s gro!,Ap/ meeting with residents on Melas Pa?,k, The comments on the plan were vary positive. There was some concern for the amourt of drinking going on in the park evenings and week—ends, and residents asked t;h:at we work together to make sure tne police patrol this. I talked witih Chief Pavlock about this concern and he is giving me his Fl..11 cooperation which I appreciate. The Board is anxious to move ahead on the project and has expressed some conceer that the Village has been sitting an this since the first week in March when I delivered the plan and d-scussed it with you. Let me know when plan tc sign off on the plan so that we can move ahead as residents are now anxious to see the park developed. 7Th...-- T. Director, s t Recreation MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT TT T/ I k VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON,V�LAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMNTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: MAY 7, 1992 SUBJECT: CHURCHES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS As we discussed, I have contacted the Northwest Municipal Conference and asked that they conduct a survey of their member municipalities concerning churches in residential zoning districts. The survey has been completed and submitted to me. At my request, the survey included the following questions: 1. Do you.allow churches in residential zoning districts? Permitted Use or Special Use? 2. Would the conversion of a single family home to a church be allowed? 3. Does your municipality have any building, zoning or life safety regulations that would prohibit, regulate or control the conversion of a home to a church? 4. Has your municipality ever experienced the conversion of a home to a church? If yes, how was required off-street parking provided? Twenty-seven municipalities responded to the survey. Of this number, nine allowed churches as permitted uses, similar to Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. Seventeen communities require a Special Use/Conditional Use permit. One community requires churches in an institutional district. A majority of the respondents indicated that a house could be converted into a church, but that building codes, life safety codes and zoning restrictions would make a conversion difficult. Four municipalities indicated that homes had been converted to churches, and that all provided required on-site parking. Considering this information and reviewing the issues at New Life Church, 1 West Euclid, staff would recommend that the Zoning Ordinance be amended to require a Special Use Permit for a church in residential zoning districts. John Fulton Dixon May 7, 1992 Page 2 The Special Use process allows the Village to review requests on a case-by-case basis, and is the best way to look into matters like impact of parking lots, lighting, landscaping and compatibility with adjoining properties. The Special Use process allows a petitioner the opportunity to demonstrate how a proposed church would benefit the community and immediate neighborhood, and meet all applicable building and zoning regulations. The Special Use category should be looked at as a positive way for a church to tell the community about their plans, rather than a way to limit individual rights. A summary of the survey responses is attached. Please note that the complete surveys would need to be reviewed for an explanation of certain responses. DMC:hg Attachmen NWMC GIC ,SURVEY CHURCHES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS APRIL 1992 This compilation for comparative purposes only. Please consult original surveys for full detail. KEY P = PERMITTED USE S = SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE 0 = OTHER Y = YES N = NO * = COMMENTS IN SURVEY ACTUAL ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS CONVERSION COMMENTS Y N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y Y N Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N N N N N Y N N N N N N N N N * * * CHURCHES CHURCH MUNICIPALITY ALLOWED CONVERT ARLINGTON HTS P Y BARRINGTON P Y BARTLETT P N BUFFALO GROVE S Y DES PLAINES P Y ELK GROVE S Y EVANSTON S Y GLENCOE P Y HANOVER PARK S Y HOFFMAN ESTATES N LIBERTYVILLE S Y LAKE FOREST S N LINCOLNSHIRE S Y LINCOLNWOOD S Y MORTON GRV S Y NORTHBROOK N Y NILES S Y PALATINE P Y PARK RIDGE S Y ROLLING MDWS P Y ROSELLE P Y SCHAUMBURG S N SKOKIE P Y STREAMWOOD S Y WHEELING S Y WILMETTE S WINNETKA S Y ACTUAL ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS CONVERSION COMMENTS Y N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y Y N Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N N N N N Y N N N N N N N N N * * * VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, q " MANAGER �v FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: MAY 8, 1992 SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN On May 6, the Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission (B.D.D.R.C.) completed their review of proposed changes to the Downtown Section of the Comprehensive Plan. You will recall that B.D.D.R.C. wanted an opportunity to review recommendations by the Plan Commission for certain land use and transportation issues on Maple Street. After discussion, B.D.D.R.C. is recommending to the Village Board that no changes be made in the Comprehensive Plan for the three Maple Street issues that are summarized in the attached memorandum and minutes. Members of B.D.D.R.C. point out that the Maple Street issues have been in planning documents since 1976, and it would be appropriate at this time to allow our preferred developer, Broadacre, to complete their downtown market studies and project planning before making any changes to planning policies on Maple Street. B.D.D.R.C. believes more work by Broadacre will allow a more complete evaluation of key parts of the downtown plan. DMC:hg Attachment VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT & REDEVELOPMENT COMM, HAL PREDOVICH, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: MAY 6, 1992 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN As you know, the Plan Commission has completed their review of the Comprehensive Plan, and is recommending several changes to the Downtown Section. You will recall that on August 28, 1991, B.D.D.R.C. reviewed the Downtown Section of the Plan as part of the overall process for the Plan Commission. B.D.D.R.C. recommended that no changes be made to the Downtown Section, but stated that more detailed studies of the original 1976 Downtown Plan be updated to reflect strategy and policy changes. With this information from B.D.D.R.C. the Comprehensive Plan Committee of the Plan mi Comssion continued their review, and the Plan Commission convened the required public hearings. After public hearings, the Plan Commission is recommending a number of changes in the Downtown section. The following items are of particular interest to B.D.D.R.C.: 1. Changing the land -use designation on the east side of Maple Street from Central to Northwest Highway from multi -family to single-family. 2. Deleting a statement about relocating the train station further east. Rather than moving the station as proposed in the 1976 Plan, the Plan Commission recommends that a study be conducted to determine if train platforms could be expanded further east in an effort to relieve traffic back-ups at Emerson and Elmhurst Road. 3. Deleting a statement about a future railroad grade crossing at Maple Street, and recommending that Maple Street be classified as a residential street rather than a collector street. After initial discussion, the Village Board asked that B.D.D.R.C. review the Plan Commission recommendation prior to any Village Board action. This was the result of a request by Chairman Predovich. Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission Hal Predovich, Chairman May 6, 1992 Page 2 Concerning the three items discussed above, staff should point out that a number of residents on Maple Street attended the public hearings and expressed concerns about the multi -family designation, the Maple Street crossing and the collector street classification. These residents explained to the Plan Commission that there are a number of young families now on Maple Street and the area has proven to be an attractive, established residential area. These residents believed that the above plan elements would prove disruptive to their neighborhood. Further, one resident pointed out that the sale of a home had been lost because of the multi -family land -use designation. The potential buyer did not want to purchase the home since the Comprehensive Plan designated the area as multi -family. At this time, B.D.D.R.C. may want to discuss the changes as proposed by the Plan Commission, and their initial recommendation from August. Staff agrees that the approach taken by B.D.D.R.C. in August suggesting a re-evaluation and update of the 1976 Plan is very important now that the Plan Commission is recommending certain changes. It should be recognized that our preferred developer, Broadacre, is undertaking market studies for downtown and site planning for the triangle area west of Main Street. It might be best to evaluate this information more fully before making any changes in the downtown elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The market study will provide current conditions on the downtown economy, and project site planning west of Main Street will help us understand the development philosophy and specifics that Broadacre hopes to bring to our downtown area. These items can have a residual effect on the Maple Street issues, and staff believes the fact that this work is currently underway should be considered when reviewing changes to the Comprehensive Plan. As a summary, it is staff's recommendation that the Maple Street issues previously identified not be changed in the current Comprehensive Plan revisions. Broadacre's planning tasks should be completed, and the entire downtown strategy evaluated considering Broadacre's development impact. Staff understands that the Maple Street residents have very important reasons for their opinions on these matters. It is hoped the residents understand that these long-range plan elements have existed since 1976, and an additional period of time is reasonable to allow Broadacre to complete their analysis of downtown conditions. DMC:hg BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Wednesday, May 5, 1992 CALL TO ORDER: A special meeting of the Mount Prospect Business District Development and Redevelop- ment Commission (B.D.D.R.C.) was called to order by Chairman Predovich at 7:35 P.M. on Wednesday, May 5, 1992 at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Members of the Commission present: John Eflering, Keith Youngquist, Bart Ke1jik (arrived approximately 8:00 p.m.), and Chairman Hal Predovich. Members absent: John Metzenthin and Joseph Janisch. Also present: Janet Hansen, Executive Director Mount Prospect Chamber; Trustee Irvana Wilks; Donald Weibel, Plan Commission Chairman; David M. Clements, Planning Department Director; and Kenneth Fritz, Economic Development Coordinator. Residents from Maple Street present: Patty Maro, Tom and Tammy Sullivan, Jim O'Malley and Richard Senoll. Comprehensive Plan &3jsjons VmmjQmm Section Chairman Predovich welcomed Don Weibel, Chairman of the Plan Commission, and asked that Don give a briefing to the B.D.D.R.C. members present regarding the proposed changes to the Downtown Section of the Comprehensive Plan, recommended by the Plan Commission. After a brief discussion of the background of the process that the Plan Commission has used to update the Comprehensive Plan, and the numerous Plan Commission Committee meetings and public hearing process with residents in the Maple Street area, Mr. Weibel indicated the following items were modified in the downtown section of the Comprehensive Plan for consideration by the Village Board: Changing the land -use designation on the east side of Maple Street from Central to Northwest Highway from multi -family to single-family. Deleting a statement relative to the relocation of the train station further east. Rather than moving the station as proposed in the 1976 Plan, the Plan Commission recommends that a study be conducted to determine if METRA commuter trains create unsatisfactory street congestion at Emerson and Route 83, and if so, whether moving the stopping points of the commuter train would adequately reduce the level of train blocking of these streets. Deleting a statement about a future railroad grade crossing at Maple Street, and recommending that Maple Street be classified as a residential rather than a collector street. Page 2 Residents from Maple Street summarized their concerns regarding the Comprehensive Plan's long-range land -use and transportation designations relative to Maple Street and the grade crossing. They indicated that: 1. They have made significant investments in the older single family homes on Maple Street from Northwest Highway to Central. There are over 40 young children within this two block stretch. Hence the concern for increased traffic should the street be developed as a collector street from Northwest Highway to Central as shown on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. For the same reasons listed above, Maple Street grade crossing is a concern. 3. Having properties designated multi -family on the east side of Maple Street from Northwest Highway to Central is a concern for persons' sense of long- term stability with regard to single family home ownership in this area. (Through discussion with B.D.D.R.C. members, their concerns for the pressures for multi- family development in this stretch in the immediate future were moderated. B.D.D.R.C. having suggested that this is one of the last phases for redevelopment and requires restudy along with other elements of the downtown redevelopment.) 1111, , :cram 1111�111111111111� I ill�iiji��ll��illillillillilli,!.,T Following a continuing dialogue with residents of Maple Street, the following comments were made by members. KeiLh YoungqUi:st. He questioned the elimination of a grade crossing from the Comprehensive Plan in light of the new Fire and Police Station re-establishment at the same location at Maple and Northwest Highway and the possible need for a grade crossing for better fire and police access north and south of the rail facilities. He indicated that, in his opinion, most of the traffic movements that might be added by a Maple Street grade crossing would be locally oriented, such as, movements from Prospect Avenue to Northwest Highway. It was his opinion that the congestion caused by interruption of north/south movements on Emerson and Route 83 were significant, and in addition to the fire and police needs for better response and access, the congestion in the morning and evening rush hour periods should be studied before removing the option of a grade crossing from the Comprehensive Plan. Bart Kgjli—k. He indicated, as a resident living south of the railroad for over 30 years, there is still a need to keep the grade crossing option in the Comprehensive Plan because of the congestion caused by trains in the downtown area interrupting north/south through and local traffic. John EjIgbU. He agreed that the congestion should be studied farther to allow Broadacre to comment upon the larger downtown issues of multi -family housing and circulation relative to the Maple Street area. Page 3 Chairman HW Predovi . He indicated that until more complete studies were done with Broadacre and others, he reiterated the earlier position taken by B.D.D.R.C. in September, 1991 suggesting a re-evaluation/update of the 1976 Downtown Plan, especially since more accurate information is being developed with regard to market studies and planning strategies by Broadacre. Motion A motion was made by John Eilering, seconded by Bart Keljik, to recommend to the Village Board that no deletions be made to the downtown section of the Comprehensive Plan until Broadacre consultants have had an opportunity to evaluate these elements in larger context of the more detailed Downtown Plan. The motion passed 4 ayes, 0 nays. REDEVELOPMENT ISSUE Disomimn 1 B.D.D.R.C. reviewed the summary of issues to be discussed at the May 12 Committee -of - Whole Meeting as outlined by Broadacre management and staff. The major issues were as follows: 1. Broadacre is not in a position to acquire land on its own account or as a part of the project redevelopment. Broadacre will look to the Village to acquire the land as the Village's equity in the project development with Broadacre raising the investment capital for project improvements including residential and commercial uses. 2. Broadacre is to demonstrate, through financial analysis, the need to amend or expand the TIF boundaries in order that the financial mechanisms available through TIF can help to ensure a successful project implementation. 3. Develop a land -use strategy consistent with the objectives and guidelines for downtown redevelopment endorsed by B.D.D.R.C. and adopted by the Village Board. A preliminary concept plan was discussed having been transmitted by Broadacre and their architectural consultants, Decker and Kemp, for the purposes of preliminary review prior to the May 12 meeting. The major features of the concept plan show a residential component made up of 334 apartment units in 4 separate buildings in the block occupied presently by the Aldi's and old Public Works Facility. Two of the apartment buildings would be 5 stories and 2 would be 6 stories in height. It is proposed that an underground parking structure could support in excess of 700 parking spaces. It was anticipated that, of this number, 300 spaces or more could be devoted to commercial and commuter parking. Page 4 A retail component would be centered on either side of a new green belt with major access from Main Street (Route 83) running westerly surrounding the green belt with local access for shopper parking to retail stores located on either side of the green belt. It was also anticipated that retail space would be provided on the first floor of some of the residential apartment buildings. A senior citizen housing component has also been shown in the concept drawing on property located at the southeast comer of Pine and Central on property earlier purchased and cleared by the Village. A major component of the concept plan is the relocation of Northwest Electric to properties now occupied by the service station and auto body shop having frontage on Main Street and Central. As part of the concept for downtown Mount Prospect redevelopment and for a later development phase, Broadacre has suggested the block containing the library and senior citizen and associated municipal parking lot area complement the new development west of Main Street. They propose a'public plaza at the surface level south of the library and properties currently devoted to on -street parking between the library and the senior center. This design would consider underground parking below the civic plaza area and a possible extension of underground parking from the library facility to the north. Completing the concept plan would be a proposed civic building located on the present First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect parking lot on the east side of Emerson Street between Busse and Central. A preliminary sketch is attached for identification of these areas. The proposed development as shown in this preliminary sketch will contain roughly 400,000 square feet of developed area with 85,000 square feet of that total devoted to commercial/office use. It is projected that the total development cost will be in the neighborhood of $42 to $46 million, with the Village contributing roughly $3 million in land cost and Broadacre $8 to $10. million in initial investment equity. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of April 15, 1992 were approved on a motion by Keith Youngquist, seconded by John Eilering. The motion to approve as submitted passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Kenheth H. Fritz, Economic Develo 200,2094 09lw� ir, 21f a, 1 I 0O Cl ul LL, Phone: 70e / 392-6000 Fax: 70e / 392-6022 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Special Meeting May 14, 1992 7:30 P. M. Trustees Room, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street L ZBA-19-,.92, Charles A. Luke, 1605 East Cedar Lane The petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 21.601 of the Mount Prospect Building Code to allow a six (6) foot fence instead of the maximum allowed five (5) foot fence along the rear property line. The Zoning Board of Appeals is final in this request. 2. Workshop No. 5 A. Continuation of Discussion of General Provisions B. Residential Districts NOTE: In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen (15) day period is provided for anyone wishing to appeal their decision. No permit will be issued until this period has elapsed. MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY TRUSTEES MARK W BUSSE GEORGE A CLOWES TIMOTHY J. CORCORAN LEO FLOROS PAUL WM. HOEFERT IRVANA K. WILKS Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 CAROL A FIELDS Phone: 70e / 392-6000 Fax: 70e / 392-6022 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Special Meeting May 14, 1992 7:30 P. M. Trustees Room, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street L ZBA-19-,.92, Charles A. Luke, 1605 East Cedar Lane The petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 21.601 of the Mount Prospect Building Code to allow a six (6) foot fence instead of the maximum allowed five (5) foot fence along the rear property line. The Zoning Board of Appeals is final in this request. 2. Workshop No. 5 A. Continuation of Discussion of General Provisions B. Residential Districts NOTE: In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen (15) day period is provided for anyone wishing to appeal their decision. No permit will be issued until this period has elapsed.