HomeMy WebLinkAbout0392_001MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
OCTOBER 9, 1990
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. Present at the meeting were:
Mayor Gerald L. Farley; Trustees Ralph Arthur, Mark Busse, Timothy Corcoran,
Leo Floros, George Van Geem and Theodore Wattenberg. Also present at the
meeting were: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon, Assistant Village Manager
John Burg, Public Works Director Herbert Weeks, Village Forester Sandy Clark,
Cable Television Administrator Cheryl Pasalic; two members of the press and 15
persons in the audience.
II. MIN( 5
The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of September 25, 1990 were
accepted and filed.
III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
Don Harmon, 16 North William Street, asked what the plan for Melas Park is.
Manager Dixon reported on the tentative plans for the Park and said he would
send a copy of these plans to Mr. Harmon.
IV. STREET LIGHTING REQUEST -LAKE BRIARWOOD SUBDIVISION
Mike Heaney, 2812 Briarwood East, acted as spokesman for the Lake Briarwood
Homeowners Association. He noted that trees have grown up in that area and
there is a lot more traffic these days. He said Police patrols need the light to see
if there is any suspicious activity. He also said the Fire trucks need the light to
be able to see the addresses on the homes. Mr. Heaney then outlined the request
by his group for the lights which they would like to have installed. He said that
all residents, with the exception of one, are in favor of the lights. He asked the
Village to approve these new lights as a standard acceptable to the Village and
he also requested CDBG funds.
A representative of the light fixture company then explained the capabilities of the
proposed light.
Doug Anderson, of 2839 Briarwood, said that everyone, with the exception of one
resident, liked the aesthetics of the lights. He indicated that for safety's sake, the
lights are necessary. He noted that there are very many pedestrians but no
sidewalks and no lights.
Trustee Wattenberg said he cannot agree with this request. He said there is very
limited public benefit. Also, he said this is not a standard light fixture and would
require a great additional expense. He said that if we allowed these kinds of
lights, we would have to do it in other areas too.
Trustee Arthur said that developers are required to install lights. He said other
areas in town do not have lights, and they use their front porch lights or gas
lights. He said the Village has been very generous already and has committed
approximately $200,000 to improvements in the area since it was annexed in 1978.
He felt that the Village should not share in the cost of this project.
Trustee Floros thought this would be a good addition to the community and it
would be an important precedent for the Village. He said he would like to see
lights throughout the Village, and he would welcome any program that would light
up the Village.
Trustee Corcoran said that he could only support the use of a standard light
fixture. He also suggested that they obtain a petition from all the homeowners
in the area to demonstrate complete support. He said he was leaning toward a
75-80% responsibility by the homeowners.
Trustee Busse felt the Village should participate in some manner. He also
thought the Village should help with the means of financing.
Trustee Van Geem felt the Village should not participate in this project. He did
not feel that $1,000 per home would be a hardship especially since there would
be a very major benefit to the homeowners.
Mayor Farley said that he would support Village participation but only to the
extent of the perceived public benefit. Mayor Farley said he supported a 10%
participation by the Village. Mayor Farley then polled the Committee to see if
there is a consensus about a 10% participation by the Village.
Trustees Arthur, Van Geem and Wattenberg felt the Village should not participate
in the cost of this project. Trustee Floros felt that 10% was too low a level of
participation. Trustee Busse was willing to go along with 10%. Trustee Corcoran
felt that 20% would be a more appropriate participation, but only with the
understanding that standard Village lights would have to be used.
N
Mayor Farley then polled the Committee as to whether they would support a 20%
participation by the Village using a standard light. Once again, Trustees Arthur,
Van Geem and Wattenberg felt the Village should not participate in the cost.
Trustees Busse, Corcoran and Floros agreed with the 20% participation. Mayor
Farley said that he was not comfortable with a 20% participation, but he said he
would support some type of participation.
The consensus of the Committee was that the Village would be willing to
participate to the extent of 10-19% as long as standard light fixtures approved by
the Village would be used. Also, the Village would be willing to help with a
special taxing district. The maintenance of the lights would be the responsibility
of the Lake Briarwood homeowners unless an approved light stocked by the
Village were to be used. Also, the electric cost would be taken care of by the
Village.
Mr. Anderson said he would advise the homeowners at the next meeting.
zln��I �IVIN - #1 '-4 USA A-UM-CS1
Mayor Farley introduced the subject of obstructions in the public right-of-way. He
noted that the Village has been enforcing the removal of various sight obstructions
and hazards in the public right-of-way, but the staff has requested additional
direction in this matter.
Trustee Corcoran suggested that the Safety Commission could review appeals of
decisions by the Public Works Department requiring removal of various sight
obstructions.
Trustee Arthur indicated that this Ordinance has been on the books since 1984.
He noted that the purpose of the Ordinance is safety. He does not want to see
the Village sued. He said to leave the Ordinance in place and agreed with
turning the review responsibility over to the Safety Commission with the Village
Board acting as final arbiter.
Trustee Wattenberg agreed with enforcing the Ordinance as recommended by the
Village Manager to prevent any liability. He agreed that the Manager should be
the Hearing Officer.
Trustee Busse felt the Village should continue to have the Ordinance in force.
However, he suggested trying to publicize to the residents what is prohibited in
the parkways so they do not spend money needlessly. He also would rather see
any reviews of Public Works' decisions to go to the Safety Commission.
-3-
Trustee Van Geem felt the Village should scrap the current Ordinance. He felt
the Village has an Ordinance and we are not enforcing it. He said either we
should have the Police and Public Works remove all obstructions from the
parkway or do away with the Ordinance if we cannot enforce it totally. He
,agreed that we need to emphasize safety and sight triangles around intersections.
However, it is almost ,impossible to enforce the thousands of small ornamental
items on the parkways.
Mayor Farley asked what could be done by residents to keep cars off the lawns.
Mr. Weeks indicated that there is a special plastic reflective device that the
Village installs on request at curves and corners which lets drivers know they have
gone off the road.
Trustee Arthur disagreed with Trustee Van Geem's notion that the Ordinance is
not being enforced. He said, per the memo prepared by Public Works Director
Herb Weeks, the Village appears to be attacking the problem of sight obstructions
in the parkway very hard and very systematically.
Trustee Floros agreed with Trustee Arthur on this point. He said to leave the
Ordinance the way it is with review by the Safety Commission.
Mayor Farley would also like to see the Safety Commission review the decisions.
However, he would like to see the Safety Commission make the final
determination. He would like to see the Village staff only as ex -officio members
in this review process. In this instance, the citizens on the Safety Commission
would then be able to make the decision.
Don Harmon, 16 North William, urged the Committee to enforce the Ordinance.
He said the parkways should be for grass and trees.
Mayor Farley indicated the consensus was that the staff should continue to enforce
the Ordinance as equally and fairly as possible. Also, the Safety Commission
would then be asked to review decisions by the Public Works Department.
Trustee Van Geem noted that a homeowner on Ironwood sent a letter explaining
why the Ordinance should not be enforced in areas with no sidewalks or curbs.
Herb Weeks cautioned the Committee to be mindful of the fact that this
Ordinance should be enforced. According to the attorney, the Village could be
held liable for failure to enforce the Ordinance,
Mayor Farley noted that he will ask the Safety Commission Chairman if he wishes
to take over the additional responsibility to review these decisions. He will invite
the Safety Commission to a Committee of the Whole meeting if they wish to
discuss the issue.
-4-
VI. DISCUSSION ON _.HETHER TO BROADCAST ZON. BOARD MEETINGS
Manager Dixon reported that it would cost an additional $1,300 to broadcast the
Zoning Board meetings. This figure only covers the additional expense for
community assistants.
Trustee Arthur felt it would be worth $1,300 to broadcast the meetings.
Trustee Van Geem said he would like to try it for awhile to see if residents like
the service.
Trustee Corcoran questioned the $1,300 figure. He said that it would cost $26,000
to hire the proper personnel to do it correctly without taking away time from
current staff needs. He suggested this item should be taken up during the regular
Budget sessions to determine whether this project should be undertaken.
Cable Television Administrator Cheryl Pasalic noted that it would take away
approximately four hours from the present duties handled by staff members.
Trustee Floros supported the idea of broadcasting the meetings.
Mayor Farley also supported the broadcasting of the meetings.
There was a consensus by the Committee to authorize the telecasting of ZBA
meetings beginning in January.
VII. MANAGER'S REPORT
1. Manager Dixon reported that engineers from the Village, from Arlington
Heights and District 214 will meet on Thursday to discuss the proposed study of
the flooding problems near Prospect High. On Friday, we should have the cost
of the study. Also, Manager Dixon noted that residents need not worry about the
ponding of water caused by leaves over the drains. He asked that residents who
see this happening should call Public Works or possibly lend a helping hand to
brush the leaves away.
2. Village Manager Dixon noted that the intergovernmental meeting will be held
on Thursday.
VIII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
There being no further business to come before the Committee of the Whole, the
Committee moved on to the next item of business.
IX ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
tJP.
BURG
JPB/rcw Assistant Village Manager
14
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 19, 1990
SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Staff has had several discussion with employee groups concerning the start-up of an
Employee Assistance Program. We have had overwhelming support for such a Program
particularly as outlined in the attached memorandum.
As you are aware, the Drug Free Workplace Act takes effect at the beginning of this
next calendar year. While it does not mandate that an Employee Assistance Program
be put in place, I feel it addresses other needs other than drug-related problems that our
employees may come into contact with over the years.
The cost is $19.50 per employee. We presently have 272 full-time employees of the
Village. This would be an annual cost of $5,304. 1 think the benefit the Village would
receive from this small expenditure would have a more satisfied employee and would also
have an outlet for an employee who may undergo any of the different types of problems
that may arise and would more than compensate for this expenditure.
I would recommend the Village Board authorize the expenditure of $19.50 per full-time
employee for the Employee Assistance Program benefit to the Northwest Municipal
Conference for a total cost of $5,304 per year.
JOHN FULTON DIXON
JFD/rcw
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
1616E GOLFROAD A REGIONAL SSOCIATON IW- ILL INOIS
MUNK"I)PAUDESAND 7OWNSHIPS
DES PLAINES, IL 60016 PEPRESENTING A POPULADON 01 QVEP ONE MILL ()N
(708) 296 9200 FAX296 9' 207 FOONDED W 1958
TO: All Conference Managers, Administrators,
Supervisors and Personnel Directors
FROM:
Trixie Ann Golberg, AdtKnistrative
Assistant for Public Information
SUBJECT: NWMC Employee Assistance Program
DATE: October 16, 1990
It is estimated that 18% of any workforce is affected by
personal problems that can impact job performance. These
problems can decrease productivity by 25%. In response to
a growing understanding that how an employee feels affects
performance on the job, businesses, industry and government
agencies across the country have begun to offer counseling
through Employee Assistance Programs.
studies indicate that counseling and the other personal
assistance programs offered by EAPs help companies reduce
absenteeism, decrease employee turnover, and lessen health
care expenses.
EAP programs are becoming "standard" employee benefits in
both the private and public sectors. Recent "Drug Free
Workplace" legislation has also focused attention on the
need for such programs for local government employees,
large and small.
In order to make this benefit available to all Conference
members on a cost-effective basis, the Conference has
established an EAP Consortium for interested members.
Cost of the program is $19.50/employee/year. All EAP
services will be provided by Comprehensive Psychological
Centers P.C. (CPC). CPC has several office locations
throughout the north and northwest region. The Conference
will assist with program administration and staffing of the
Employee Assistance Advisory Committee.
Please review the enclosed program packet for additional
details on the program and CPC. Please contact me if you
would like more information or to arrange a meeting with a
CPC representative.
kk
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
()rvA
16'16 E G01 F ROADrAiI;IF fai
aESPLAIM-S iL.6001e
(708) 296 V,00 PAX. 296-9207
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
.Joint Employee Assistance Program
I. PROGSUMMAR
An Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is a confidential
employee benefit which provides no -cost problem
assessment and referral services for employees and their
dependents. It is designed for employees whose job
performance may be affected by personal problems.
Problems addressed by an EAP include: Alcohol/Drug
Abuse, Family Problems, Legal Problems, Financial
Problems, Emotional Problems, Stress, and Marital and
Relationship Difficulties.
Program Adminiat=i=
The Conference has developed a joint EAP program which
will be administered by the Conference through the EAP
Advisory Committee. This consortium approach will result
in a cost-effective, high quality program for our members
choosing to participate.
The Conference will:
a. Administer the EAP Provider Contract
b. Conduct annual billings and employee counts
c. Assist in program development and evaluation as
requested
d. Staff the EAP Advisory Committee
�$ Provider
Provider: The Conference will contract with
Comprehensive Psychological Centers (ComPsych) to provide
all EAP services. ComPsych is a state licensed
psychological service corporation and is an experienced
and qualified provider of counseling and referral
services. All services are provided by qualified,
licensed counselors,
9: The annual cost will be $19.50 per full and part-
time employee as designated by the municipality/township.
The program year will run from May 1 to April 30.
Members wishing to begin the program prior to May 1, 1990
are encouraged to do so and fees will be determined on a
pro -rated basis.
Participation: The Joint EAP is an optional Conference
program and members may participate on a voluntary basis.
II. PROGRAM OUTLINE
EAP Services
The EAP Program includes the following services and
activities:
1. Management/Supervisor Training
Workshops are conducted for all managerial and
supervisory staff. These two to three hour workshops
cover all aspects of the EAP and program procedures.
Areas covered include:
The EAP Policy Statement
EAP procedures as to eligibility, self and
supervisory referrals and utilization.
Hands-on training and role playing on conducting
difficult employee discussions and identifying and
motivating troubled employees to seek help.
2. Employee Origntatign
All employees attend an on-site orientation which will
introduce employees to the new benefit. The program's
purpose, policies, eligibility, how to utilize the
program, program confidentiality, referral process, and
the relationship of the EAP to existing health insurance
benefits will each be reviewed.
3. Assessment and Referral Service
All employees, their spouses and dependents are
provided, free of charge, face-to-face clinical
assessment sessions with a qualified EAP counselor.
Participants are entitled to up to three sessions per
presentation of a problem. There is no yearly
limitation to the number of presenting problems that a
participant may utilize the program to resolve.
Qualified EAP staff are available 24 hours a day, seven
days a week, through an 800 -number and benefit cards
will be provided to each employee.
When additional intervention is necessary, a referral is
made to the appropriate resource within the client's area
for further assistance in the resolution of their
problem. The EAP provider will continue to monitor the
employee to ensure that the participant is receiving
the appropriate treatment in a cost-effective manner.
The program includes significant emphasis on
promotion through various means such as employee
mailings, flyers and workshops.
Program evaluation will occur at various stages of the
process including, but not limited to, Participant
Evaluations, Manager/Employee Orientation Evaluations,
and Assessment and Referral Follow-up.
Quarterly program utilization reports will be
distributed to management and the NWMC Advisory
Committee. Each participating member will appoint a
representative to the Advisory committee which will
meet quarterly. This person shall also serve as the
EAP contact person for that member.
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT
This agreement is made as of the day of 1990,
by and between the Northwest Municipal Conference (NWMC) and the
(Member).
(city/village/township)
Definitions
EAP: An Employee Assistance Program (EAP), a work -site based
program, designed to assist in the identification and
resolution of productivity problems associated with
employees impaired by personal concerns including, but
not limited to, health, marital, family, financial,
alcohol, drug, legal, emotional, stress and other
personal concerns which may adversely affect employee
job performance.
Member: NWMC member municipality or township participating
in the NWMC Joint Employee Assistance Program.
Employee: Employee, full and/or part time, of each joint program
member as designated as a program participant by his/her
employer.
Provider: Comprehensive Psychological Centers, 30 North Michigan
Avenue, Suite 1429, Chicago Illinois, or other provider as
designated by NWMC.
I. SERVICES TO NWMC
JOINT EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM MEMBERS
1. Program Development and Member Policy Statement
Prior to the implementation of the program, the provider will
review with representatives of NWMC, members and employees,
specific needs for the NWMC Employee Assistance Program.
During the initial development period, the provider will
clearly define and create an EAP policy statement to be
disseminated to all NWMC members and employees. This policy
will discuss:
A. Elements of the Program
B. Eligibility
C. Program Organization
D. Utilization Procedures
2.
3.
The provider will review and maintain records of all members'
benefit packages and employee contracts as they pertain to EAP
services.
Management/Supervisor Training
This is a critical part of a successful EAP and mandatory for
proper employee utilization rates. These workshops will be
provided during the initial start-up phase and a maximum of
once a year thereafter so as to increase supervisory awareness
and involvement in the EAP process. All workshops shall occur
on a date and time mutually agreed to by member and provider.
All NWMC Employee Assistance Program Management/Supervisor
training workshops are done at each member's work -site and
attempts to fully cover the following areas:
A. The EAP policy statement.
B. The EAP procedures relative to eligibility, utilization,etc
C. In-depth substance abuse and psychological disorders
awareness education, such as to attempt to increase
supervisors' ablities to identify and motivate troubled
employees to seek help.
D. Hands-on training and role playing on conducting difficult
employee discussions. This can be particularly effective
in helping members create and/or modify their documentation
procedures for troubled or poorly performing employees.
The workshop length runs between 2-3 hours per session and will
consist of a maximum of 30 managers/supervisors per session.
Senior level managers may be trained separately from other
supervisors and managers. This procedure will be determined
after analysis of the member's management structure.
Employee Orientations
If mutually agreed to by member and provider, employee
orientations shall follow management/supervisor training.
Employee orientations shall also occur on a date and time
mutually agreed to by member and? provider. These on site
orientations are available for employees, their spouses and
dependents and will cover:
A. EAP Purpose
B. EAP Policy
C. EAP Eligibility
D. Utilization Procedures
E. Confidentiality and protection of employee's rights.
F. Substance abuse and psychological awareness education.
G. In-depth discussion of the referral process and linkage
with provider staff:
24 hour accessibility
Confidentiality
Statistical reports to members by provider without
jeopardizing employee confidentiality
Supervisory referral process
Release of information form
Relationshp to insurance program and benefits
These orientations are provided on-site and coordinated with
the member's management team to allow maximum coverage of
employees. It is extremely important that all participating
employees attend these orientations. Average length of these
orientations is 30-45 minutes per session.
4. Program Promotion
In order to maximize program visibility and employee awareness
the following methods are utilized on a regular basis:
A. Employee orientations conducted on a regular basis.
B. Workshops dealing with psychological issues.
C. Home mailings - developed, as determined appropriate, by
the EAP Advisory Committee.
D. Posters provided monthly.
E. Literature - topical information leaflets provided
periodically.
F. Promotions as determined by the EAP Advisory Committee.
G. Benefit Cards - 2/employee
H. Particpation in "Health" and "Benefit" day events as
requested.
5. Assessment
All member employees, their spouse and dependents, are
provided, free of charge, face-to-face clinical assessment
sessions with a counselor at provider's office, unless agreed
to otherwise by provider. Generally 1-3 sessions are required
for proper diagnosis of each presenting problem. There is no
yearly limitation to the number of presenting problems that
a participant may utilize the program to resolve.
All provider staff are available 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, through our 800 -number to take emergency or assessment
appointments. Emergencies are dealt with on an immediate
basis and all non -emergency initial assessment appointments
will be scheduled within 24 hours.
All provider offices are staffed with doctoral level, licensed
and board certified clinical psychologists to attempt to make
the crucial differential diagnosis at the early phase of
assessment.
6. Referral
When additional intervention is necessary, a referral is made to
the appropriate resources within the client area to attempt to
further assist in the resolution of their problem.
The provider will maintain a continual role to attempt to
assure that the employee and/or family member are receving the
appropriate treatment in a cost-effective manner. This will
entail a review of the initial treatment plan, with the doctor
and or service provider, and termination forms with any
additional recommendations for follow-up care.
7. Statistical Reporting
NWMC and the member will receive, on a quarterly basis,
statistical analysis of:
A. All cases seen.
B. specific program trends.
C. Overall utilization trends and recommendations for program
direction, promotion and intervention strategies for the
following quarter.
D. Local intervention suggestions from a clinical perspective.
The program will assign a clinical case coordinator to handle
all clinical program consultation and a business account
consultant to handle non -clinical coordination of the program.
II. NWMC ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND ADMINISTRATION
1. The NWMC will coordinate and administer the EAP and shall be
responsible for contract administration, billing and providing
annual counts of particpating employees.
2. The NWMC will staff and coordinate and EAP Advisory committee
which will meet quarterly. Memberships will include one
contact person as designated by each participating member, and
one at -large NWMC representative.
III. FEES
To cover all services described in the Agreement, a fee of
$19.50 per participating employee per year will be charged to
each member. Payment shall be due on or before June 1 of each
contract year. Each member will provide the total number of
particpating employees as of May 1 of each contract year.
IV. TERM
The initial terms of this Agreement shall be for a period of two
(2) years from the date initially signed by both parties, and
shall be deemed automatically renewed for successive one (1)
year periods thereafter; provided, however, that either party
may terminate this Agreement for any reason after the
expiration of the initial terms upon sixty (60) days advance
written notice to the other party. Either party may immediately
terminate this Agreement at any time in the event of a default
or breach of any of the terms of this Ageement by the other
party by giving such other party written notification and
stating the nature of the breach or default.
V. LIABILITY
The provider is at all times deemed to be an independent
contractor. NWMC shall not be liable for the acts or
omissions of the provider, or continuation of the Agreement
in the event of a breach of contract by the provider.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed as the day and year first above
written.
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE MEMBER
By: By:
Title:
By: (village/city/township)
Date: Date:
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
All
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services
DATE: October 18, 1990
SUBJECT: MAJOR STREETS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS
Per your request, the Engineering Division has prepared a map and cost
estimate to construct sidewalks on major streets where walks are missing.
Two areas not included in the cost estimates are the railroad R.O.W. along
the south side of Northwest Highway and the north side of Prospect Avenue.
The cost estimate was based on 5' wide walks and $3.00 per square foot
cost.
The Village Budget each year contains a line item for New Sidewalks.
These amounts have ranged from $15,000 in 1987 to $30,000 in 1990. Our
policy for construction of new sidewalks has been to install walks in
areas where there is the most pedestrian traffic with no walks on either
side of the street or in areas where there are the most requests for walks.
We also require developers who fall under our Development Code to construct
walks along the limits of their property.
I would recommend that we continue with this policy.
Chuck Bencic
CB/bv
Att.
cc: File
Length of Missing Sidewalk
On Major Streets
Throughout The Village of
Mount Prospect
Length Area
Estimated
Lin Ft Sq Ft
Cost
State Routes
68,346.00
341,730.00
$1,025,190.00
County
Township Roads
33,630.00
168,150.00
$504,450.00
Local Major Streets
20,668.00
103,340.00
$310,020.00
Total
$1,839,660.00
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 19, 1990
SUBJECT: DOWNSPOUT DISCONNECTION PROGRAM
As you know, the Ordinance requiring the disconnection of downspouts in the combined
sewer area requires compliance by November 1, 1990. A quick spot check showed that
approximately 60% of the homeowners have complied. You have requested a
recommendation on enforcement of this Ordinance.
I recommend the hiring of one temporary part-time employee in Inspection Services to
work two eight-hour days per week for approximately six months. This employee would
first perform a walk -by survey of the thousands of homes affected by the Ordinance to
identify the homes which have not complied. The Village would then send a letter to
those homeowners stating a deadline for compliance, giving instructions how to properly
disconnect, providing a list of local senior citizens willing to perform the work at a
reasonable price and inviting them to call this individual with any questions. This
employee would do the necessary follow-up and appear in Court when required. The
Village would pay mileage in addition to the salary. The personnel and vehicle expense
would be approximately $4,000.
The recommended deadline for compliance would be May 1, 1991. This would allow
ample time for compliance with winter around the corner, smooth out the workload so
that the regular Inspection Services employees do not have to commit excessive time to
the project and limit the involvement and expense of the Village Attorney.
Residents in the combined sewer area have received three notices that compliance would
be required by November 1, 1990. The first notice was a letter to all homes, the second
was an article in the Newsletter and the third was a notice on the water bill.
Although we need to be diplomatic in our letter to assure voluntary compliance, we will
have to note that failure to comply could lead to a ticket with a penalty of $100 to
$1,000. We estimate that over 800 homes are not in compliance. Our goal is not to
levy fines but rather to persuade residents to help in mitigating the problem of flooded
basements. To this end, we have identified several senior citizens who have performed
excellent handyman services in the community who will be willing to offer their services
at a fair price. Depending upon the level of compliance, we may need to keep the
temporary employee on the payroll beyond six months for ticket writing and Court
appearances.
JPB/rcw
JOHN P. BURG
JPB/rcw
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM:
VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE:
OCTOBER 19, 1990
SUBJECT:
LEASED PARKING SPACES ON PROSPECT AVENUE
We have been approached by the owner of Health Data Systems at 701 East Prospect
Avenue who inquired as to whether or not the Village might consider leasing parking
spaces along the easterly edge of Prospect Avenue.
In reviewing the parking that is presently taking place by commuters, there are several
parking spaces that are not being utilized at the far eastern edge of Prospect Avenue.
You will recall this is the area in which we designated $2.00 a day parking on Prospect
Avenue. Commuters are not using spaces generally past the 50th parking space in this
area.
I believe it would be prudent for us to look at the possibility of leased spaces similar to
what we do for the 50 spaces at the Wille Street lot. We have an annual lease
arrangement for downtown business owners at $90 per space or commuters could lease
the space and we do lease spaces to commuters for a fee of $240 per year.
I would recommend that the Village Board consider leasing at this time the last 30
spaces from space 71 through 100 to first businesses that may be interested and then
make notice available to commuters indicating that these spaces may be available for
lease. I would also recommend that the leased spaces be made available specifically to
Continental Bakery for their overnight parking of vehicles and not to be utilizing the lot
across from the Bakery.
JOHN FULTON DIXON
JFD/rcw
Village of Mount Prose ci
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
YSk
h exon, Village Manager
David C. Jepson, Finance Director
DATE: October 9, 1990 .
SUBJECT: Parking on Prospect Avenue
tit
Mr. Richard Gammon of Health Data Systems (398-7821) located at 701 East Prospect
Avenue asked if the Village would consider leasing parking spaces along the
easterly edge of the Prospect Avenue Parking Area. He stated that these spaces
are too far removed from the train station to be used by commuters. Also, he
said it is difficult for his employees to use the spaces because the collection
box is so far from the spaces.
I have reviewed the reports of parking collections since the collection boxes
were installed on September 18, 1990. During the balance of September, there
were an average of 22 out of 100 available spaces occupied, and for the first
8 days of October the average is 30. Based upon the spaces occupied, it appears
that making the last 20-30 spaces available on an annual lease arrangement could
be worthwhile.
The Village currently leases SO spaces in the Wille Street Lot on an annual lease
arrangement. The fee we charge is. $90 per year to a downtown business owner and
$240 per year for commuters.
It appears that leasing some of the spaces on prospect Avenue may be advantageous
to the Village as well as to the interested parties along Prospect Avenue. I
am sending copies of this memo to Herb Weeks and Ron Pavlock for their input and
recommendations.
DCJ/sm
c: Herb Weeks
Ron Pavlock
V
M`
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Finance Director
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 11, 1990
SUBJECT: Parking on Prospect Avenue
I've reviewed your memo of 10-9-90 relative to leasing parking
spaces on Prospect Avenue near Edward Street. If you plan on
making some parking spaces available for parking, I would recom-
mend they be on the north side of Prospect Avenue only. If
parking spaces were leased on both sides of the street, a bottle-
neck would be created which large trucks would have difficulty
moving through. Also, when street plowing is needed during the
day, I would prefer to have the south side of Prospect Avenue
relatively free of all -day parking, so we have somewhere to
discharge the snow. In addition, I would recommend that any
type of lease arrangement prohibit parking between midnight and
6:00 AM to allow us access to sweep or plow the street.
II i V4-0 EIZJ-*�
HLW/td