Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0230_001MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AUGUST 14, 1990 The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. Present at the meeting were: Mayor Gerald L Farley; Trustees Ralph Arthur, Mark Busse, Timothy Corcoran, Leo Floros, George Van Geem and Theodore Wattenberg. Also present at the meeting were: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon, Assistant Village Manager John Burg, Public Works Director Herb Weeks, Police Chief Ronald Pavlock, Human Services Administrator Nancy Morgan, Human. Services Assistant Administrator Jan Abernethy, three members of the press and five persons in the audience. IL MINUTES Trustee Wattenberg requested an addition to the July 24, 1990 Minutes, specifically, Section VI, Liquor Ordinance Changes. He noted that he had asked staff to use the resources of the NWMC for additional research on this issue. With this Amendment, the Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of July 24, 1990 were accepted and filed. Steve Ward, of Two North Pine Street, requested reimbursement of legal fees incurred related to the building construction problems next to his property. He was upset because he felt that nothing had been done since this problem began 283 days ago. Village Manager Dixon noted that further information had been requested to substantiate the legal fees and the value of the rugs. Trustee Corcoran noted that he had requested further detail on the attorneys' fees. He said that attorneys normally keep very accurate minute.by-minute records of services they have performed. He said it is not unreasonable to ask for this detail. Mr. Ward said it would be difficult to reconstruct this information. After further discussion, Mr. Ward was asked to provide additional detail on the attorneys' fees, and he was told this item would be taken up at the August 21 Board meeting. Mrs. Ward also voiced her concern about this situation. 10 V LW, Village Manager Dixon reported that a Public Information Meeting will be held at River Trails Junior High School, at 7:30 p.m., on September 19, to allow residents to voice their opinion regarding the possible purchase of the Citizens' Utilities system. There was a short discussion about whether the Village should authorize Greeley and Hansen to proceed with cost, water quality and other studies at this time. Trustees Busse and Wattenberg felt that Greeley and Hansen should be authorized to proceed with these studies. Mayor Farley suggested that the Village should wait until we hear how Prospect Heights intends to proceed. The consensus was to wait until this information is available before making a 'decision on whether to authorize Greeley and Hansen to perform these studies. CRIME STM1STXd5X9KS=QN In response to a request by Trustee Wattenberg, the Committee discussed the issue of Crime Statistics and Prevention. Trustee Wattenberg would like to see information about criminals and their punishment publicized in local papers. Police Chief Pavlock said it is up to the editorial discretion of the local newspapers to decide whether crime statistics are printed. He said the Village had approximately 6,000 arrests last year. As a result, the newspapers must be selective about what they print. He also said they cannot print any information on juveniles. Trustee Wattenberg suggested placing a watch dog in our Courts. He said he is not talking about minor crimes but rather about major crimes such as multiple home invasions. He felt the Village should hire someone for a six-month trial period to follow up on the convictions. There was no support to hire someone to be a watch dog of the Court. However, it was suggested that a standing Village Committee, such as the Recycling Commission, be established to handle this situation. Trustee Wattenberg was asked to Chair this Committee and to seek the necessary volunteers. Human Services Administrator Nancy Morgan explained the problems with the current Discount Taxi Program. She noted that the seniors are basically getting poor service due to the fact that the taxi companies are subsidizing the rides. Ms. Morgan recommended that the Village go to a metered rate with the Village paying 40% and the rider paying 60% of the metered fare up to a maximum $3.00 contribution by the Village.; She said a,survey was conducted and 83% were in favor of this 40/60 program. -2- The Committee asked numerous questions about the proposed Amendment to the Discount Taxi Program. The Committee felt that a 50150 split would make it much easier for the seniors to calculate the payment they would have to make. There was unanimous consensus to prepare an Ordinance to Amend the Discount Taxi Program to provide a 50150 split on the metered fare with a maximum payment of $3.00 by the Village. Mayor Farley asked staff to prepare a report on the transportation needs of the community. U n 0-MMET-H."T The Committee carefully reviewed the Melas, Park Agreement as revised by the Village staff and Village attorney. The Committee made various changes to the Agreement- The Committee then asked staff to send the revised Melas Park Agreement to the Park Districts for their review. It was noted that the various Boards can get together at a later date to work out the final Agreement. ............ Village Manager Dixon explained the recommendations of the Safety Commission regarding signage on Prospect Avenue and the collection boxes. Trustee Busse refrained from participating in this portion of the meeting for what may be perceived by the public as a conflict of interest. Trustee Corcoran asked what fee would be appropriate. Trustee Van Geem suggested $2.00 per day. The Committee asked that an Ordinance be prepared including a $2.00 daily fee for parking on Prospect Avenue and put up the appropriate signage as recommended by the Safety Commission. The Committee noted that paid parking spaces should be put only up to Edward Street for the time being to see what the demand is. Village Manager Dixon outlined the request by the owners of Sam's Place at 15 West Prospect Avenue to have an outdoor cafe on the sidewalk in front of their building. Manager Dixon suggested this could be done on a trial basis and that the hours should be extended until 9:30 p.m. to be consistent with what will be allowed for beer gardens next year. There appeared to be support for this concept. Staff was advised to place a Resolution on the August 21 Agenda. 1. Village Manager Dixon said that the JAWA system was struck by lightning on Saturday. The repairs are almost completed. 2. Manager Dixon reported that the Street Program is almost completed. There is landscaping still to be done. He said the Boxwood Drive Project has been delayed a few weeks. -3. XI. Trustee Van Geem requested that one item be added to the Deferred Items list. He wants to have a discussion with the Recycling Commission regarding how we dispose of old paint and solvents. Trustee Corcoran noted that he and Trustee Van Geem recently went to the Boxwood area where he saw a Police Officer do a Walk and Talk. He said this was an excellent job of public relations. He said that at a previous Coffee with Council he had invited some of the people living in the Boxwood area to a later Coffee with Council meeting to discuss the various problems they had been having in the area. He said no one showed, up at the most recent Coffee with Council. He interpreted this as a pat on the back for the Police Department which has addressed the problems in that area. XII. At 10:05 p.m.,, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, ,JOHN P. BURG JPB jrcw Assistant Village Manager -4- VIL AGE OF MOUNT PROS`I'ECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager W FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning DATE: August 21, 1990 SUBJECT: Recommendation to Increase the Maximum Loan in the Village's Single - Family Housing Rehabilitation to $25,000. In 4981, the Village Board approved the initiation of a single-family housing rehabilitation loan program utilizing Community Development Block Grant funds. The purpose of the program is to assist lower, income home owners in making needed repairs and weatherization improvements to their residence. Upon completion of the work, all housing code violations must be corrected. Over the past nine years, the Village has made 80 loans, totalling over $840,000. In the past six years, staff has noticed a significant increase in the cost of repairing eligible homes. Over the first five years of this program, the average loan was just over $8,000. Now the average of all of our loans is just over $10,500 and many of our loans are now reaching the $15,000 maximum limit. We now have two applicants whose loans will exceed $20,000 when all required repairs are made. Staff believes there are two reasons for the significant increase in individual loans, inflation and the aging of our housing stock. At the present time, there are adequate funds in the single-family housing rehabilitation loan program to support this maximum loan increase. Funding comes from an annual Community Development Block Grant and the repayment of loans. We believe this combination will provide sufficient funding for future loan applicants if current application trends and repayments continue. MES: cl Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM I= cm USA TO: Village Manager FROM: Deputy Director Public Works date; August 20, 1990 SUBJ: Multifamily Recycling In this year's budget $20,000 was allocated to do a pilot recy- cling program within our multifamily residences. original plans called for purchasing special containers, igloos, for placement at central areas within a multifamily complex. This would have required a separate container for each item recycled and would have also required the use of special equipment for collection and dumping of the materials. Since that time, I have had a chance to review several other options with our scavenger B.F.I. Based an those findings and with the Recycling Commission's review and approval, I propose the following as a recycling program for the Village's multifamily residents. We currently have 8,390 multifamily units within the village. 90% of these units are located within multistory buildings. The remaining 10% are in either single or two story buildings with front, or rear doors directly accessible to either a Village curb or parking lot curb area. It is therefore very easy and most economical to just add these units to the regular curbside program. Attached is a list of the 801 units that could be added with little or no trouble. I have also had conversations with a number of these landlords, tenants and/or homeowner asso- ciations, all of whom are anxious to participate. The costs associated with adding these 801 units would be: $3,600 for bins; $600 for printing and postage; and an annual increase of $10,700 to the recycling fees paid to BFI based on $1.11 per unit, per month. The remaining multifamily complexes would be set up with regular 1 to 3 yard dumpsters. These dumpsters would be specially paint- ed and marked and all recyclables would be dumped or commingled into the one dumpster. All the recycling dumpsters would be picked up by a regular BFI garbage truck, used for recyclables only, and hauled to BFI's new location in Palatine where the commingled recyclables would be sorted and processed for sell- ing. The cost for this service would be based on a per dumpster basis and has yet to be established. Both the Recycling Commission and I believe this is the most economical approach for our higher density multifamily complex- es. It eliminates the need for multiple containers where space is at a premium and it also eliminates the potential problem of mixed recyclables, even though separate containers would have been provided. This phase of the proposed multifamily recycling is not avail- able until BFI completes the building of their new facility in Palatine. Plans and contracts have just been finalized and awarded, with the ground breaking schedule in the very near future. Most likely they will not be in operation until after the lst of the year. The Recycling Commission requests that this item be placed an the first available Village Board agenda, August 28th if possi- ble, at which time they would make a brief presentation to the Mayor and Board of Trustees requesting their approval to proceed. Glen R. Andler GRA/eh CC: Recycling Commissioners Herbert L. Weeks Lisa Angell August 15, 1990 MULTI -FAMILY PROPOSED RECYCLING Units Peck's Subdivision Kenilworth - 1 bldg. - 8 units = Prospect Ave. - 5 bldgs. - 3 units ea. = 3 bldgs. - 5 units ea. = Central & 83 (N.E. corner) - 3 bldgs. - 12 units ea. = Judith Ann - - 8 bldgs. - 6 units ea. = Kensington Condo's - 3 bldgs. - 18 units ea. = (east of Randhurst) Wheeling Road Courts of Randview South - 2 bldgs. - 4 units ea. = - 4 bldgs. - 8 units ea. = (N. of Boxwood) - 1 bldg. - 4 units - 2. bldgs. - 6 units ea. = Courts of Randview North - 1 bldg. - 4 units - 2 bldgs. - 6 units ea. = Euclid & Wheeling - 4 bldgs. - 10 units ea. - 2 bldgs. - 4 units ea. Boxwood - 4 bldgs. - 4 units ea. - 4 bldgs. - 6 units ea. - 1 bldg. - 7 units = - 12 bldgs. - 8 units ea. Lincoln Ave. Townhouses - 10 bldg. - 5 units ea. Maple St. Townhouses - 2 bldgs. - 4 units ea. - 4 bldgs. - 5 units ea. Cottonwood - 19 bldgs. - 12 units ea. Redwood - 6 bldgs. - 4 units ea. - 1 bldg. - 5 units ea. 8 15 15 36 48 54 8 32 4 12 4 12 40 8 16 24 7 96 8 20 228 24 5 Lynn Ct. - 4,bldgs. 4 units ea. = 16 - 1 bldg. 5 units ea. = 5 - 1 bldg. 6 units ea. = 6 TOTAL 801 Cost of bins 801 x $4.40 ea. $3,524.40 Monthly B.F.I. charge 801 x $1.11 = $889.11 Yearly cost $10,669.32 Remaining budget year cost ( 7 mo.)$ 6,223.77 if started Oct. 1, 1990 Printing/costs/postage = $600.00 est. 1990/91 budget $20,000 Page 200 Acct. # 01-075-02-7034 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director DATE: August 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Real Estate TRansfer Tax Rebate For Certain Business Property The Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce has requested that the Village consider a Real Estate Transfer, Tax rebate provision for business property which would be similar to the rebate provision for residential property. When the tax was increased from $1.00 per $1,000 to $3.00 per $1,000 on May 1, 1990, a rebate of $2.00 per $1,000 was included for property owners who sold their single-family residential property within the Village and who subsequently purchased similar property within the Village. The intention of the rebate provision was to minimize the impact of the tax increase on residents who owned residential property within the Village and who then sold their property and purchased similar property within the Village. The Chamber has requested the same consideration for a business which moves from one location within the Village to another location In considering the Chamber's request to extend the rebate provision to business property, my concerns were centered in two areas: 1) How do you define a business property owner who would be eligible for the rebate?; and 2) What would be the potential loss of tax revenue to the Village? Following is a brief discussion of these two concerns: 1. Defining an eligible business property owner: It has been fairly easy to identify a residential property owner who is eligible for the rebate because we require that the eligible property be the "principal residence" of the property owner. Thus far we have been able to verify the eligible property owners through the Real Estate Transfer Declaration Forms which identifies the property that has been sold and the subsequent property that is purchased. However, for a business property it is not as clear-cut, because there could be multiple businesses in one property location and the property could be owned by someone other than the proprietor of the business. Also, it would be very difficult to identify the "principal location" of a business when there are multiple locations in the Village. To meet the intent of a business, property rebate provision which is similar in nature to the residential property rebate provision, I think the following conditions would need to apply: John Fulton Dixon Real Estate Transfer Tax Rebate For Certain Business Property Page 2 1. The business is licensed in the Village of Mount Prospect; and 2. The property where the business is located is sold; and 3„ The business relocates within the Village; and 4. The business purchases non-residential property and operates a licensed business at said property as the principal business at said property within the Village; and 5. The Real Estate Transfer Tax is paid at the $3.00 per $1,000 rate for the property purchased. The above conditions are fairly restrictive, and-do.not include a business proprietor who currently is leasing property and subsequently purchases property, or for a second location of an existing business. However, I believe they do provide a rebate provision which is similar to the residential rebate provision. 2. Fiscal Impact of a Real Estate Transfer Tax Rebate for certain business property transactions: For the fiscal year ending April 30, 1990, the total Real Estate Transfer Tax revenues for non-residential property amounted to $56,078 or 28.78 of total revenues of $195,111. (These revenues were based upon a rate of $1.00 per $1,000). If we follow the conditions identified above, the fiscal impact would be minimal. The only transaction that would have qualified during the last fiscal year was the V & G Printing relocation. Additionally, the only other transaction I can recall over the past several years would have been the Lee's Marketing relocation. There probably were other business relocations that would have qualified, but I am not aware of them. Accordingly, the above provision provides relief for a business which relocates within the Village but would have a minimal impact on revenue. The rebate provision is found in Chapter 8, Section 8 of the Village Code. I am enclosing a copy of the current code section and a separate page containing the suggested wording that would be incorporated in an amendment that would change Section 8.802 B if the change is approved. DCJ/sm Enc ARTICLE VIII REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 8.801, Definitions 8.802. Imposition or Tax 8.803. Primary Liability for Tux ` 8.804 Declaration Forms 8.805. Deeds ' 8.806. Exempt Transactions 8.807. Exemptions 8.808. Revenue Stomps Required 8.809. Real Estate Transfer Declaration; Filing 8,810. Transfers in Trust 8,811, Lien Created; Enforcement 8.812. Enforcement; Suit for Collection 8.813. Interest and Penalties 8.814, Proceeds of Tax 8.815. Penalty for Violation 8,816, Effective Date 8.817. Severability 8.818. Payment of Delinquent Water and Sower Charges 8,801- DEFINITIONS: pEn5Om, Any natural person, receiver, administrator, executor, conservator, assignee, trust in perpetuity, trust, estate, firm, co -partnership, joint venture, club, company, joint stock company, business trust, Municipal corporation, political subdivision of the State of Illinois, domestic or foreign corporation, association, syndicate, society or any group of individuals acting as a unit, whether mutual, cooperative, fraternal, nonprofit, or otherwise, and the United States or any instrumentality thereof. Whenever the term "person" is used in any clause prescribing and imposing o penalty, the term as applied to associations shall mean the owners or part-owners thereof, and as applied to corporations, the officers thereof. RECORDATION: The recording of deeds with the office of the Recorder of Deeds or the registration of deeds with the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois. VALUE: The amount of the full actual consideration for any transfer covered hereunder, including the amount of any mortgage or other lien assumed by the grantee or purchaser. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.802. IMPOSITION OF TAX; APPLICATION FOR REBATE: A. A tax shall be imposed on the transfer of title to real property located in the Village as evidenced by the recordation of a deed by any person or by the delivery of any deed or assignment of interest of said real property, made as of the first day of November, 1987, and thereafter, whether vesting the owner with the beneficial interest in or legal title to said property or merely the possession or use thereof for any purpose or to secure future payment of money or the future transfer of any such real property. The tax imposed for any transaction entered into between November 1, 1987 and through April 30, 1990 shall be one dollar ($1.00) for every one thousand dollars ($1,000) value or fraction thereof as stated in the declaration. The tax imposed for any transaction entered into on or after May 1, 1990 shall be three dollars ($3.00) for every one thousand dollars ($1,000) value or fraction thereof as stated in the declaration. The term "deed" as used in this Article shall mean all documents transferrfing or reflecting the transfer of legal title, equi- table title, or both legal and equitable title to real property, or the beneficial interest in a land trust. Delivery of any deed shall be deemed to have occurred when the transferee or purchaser, or his representative or agent, receives possession of the deed or in the case of a land trust when the trustee receives possession of a valid assignment of a beneficial interest. B. Any person who has paid the Real Estate Transfer Tax at the three dollars ($3.00) per one thousand dollar ($1,000) rate shall be entitled to a rebate of two dollars ($2.00) for each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of the purchase price, providing proper applica- tion has been made to the Village Treasurer and further provided that the individual meets the following criteria: 1. The person shall have owned and occupied a single-family residence, townhouse or condominium unit within the corporate boundaries of the Village of Mount Prospect as his principal residence and said single-family residence, townhouse or condominium was sold and the Real Estate Transfer Tax was paid within one year of the date of application for rebate: and 2. The person purchases and occupies a single-family residence, townhouse or condominium within the Village of Mount Prospect as his principal residence, for which he has paid the Real Estate Transfer Tax of three dollars ($3.00) per one thousand dollars ($1,000), within one year of the date of selling the previous residence located within the Village of Mount Prospect. -2- Within JD days following the receipt of application for Rebate of Roel Estate Transfer Tax, as provided herein, the Village Treasurer shall verify the information provided and if, in the opinion of the Village Treasurer, the applicable criteria has been met the village Treasurer shall cause a warrant to be issued to the person applying for said rebate. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87v Ord. 41729 4-17-90) 8.803. PRIMARY LIABILITY FOR 7KX, The primary liability for payment or said tax shall be borne by the grantee or purchaser involved in any such transaction unless otherwise negotiated by contract; provided, however, it shall be unlawful for the grantee or purchaser to accept a conveyance if the transfer tam has not been paid, If the tax has not been paid and the stamps affixed to the deed, then the grantee's title shall be subject to the lien provided in Section 8.811. »ocuvf and the grantee or purchaser shall be liable for payment of the tax. The tax herein levied shall be /n addition to any and all other taxes. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.804. DECLARATION FORMS: At the time the tax is paid, or on exemption applied for, there shall also be presented to the Director of Finance or his designee, on a form prescribed by him, a declaration signed by at least one of the sellers or grantors and also ninncu by at least one of the purchasers or grantees involved in the transaction, or by their attorneys or agents, or by a licensed real estate salesperson or broker having knowledge of the terms of the transaction, which declaration shall state the full consideration for the property so transferred and shall be deemed a confidential record by the village Clerk. Where the declaration is signed by an attorney, agent, licensed real estate salesperson or broker, on behalf of sellers or buyers who have the power of direction to deal with the title to the real estate under a land trust agreement, the trustees being the mere repository of record legal title with a duty of conveying the real estate only when and if directed in writing by the beneficiary or beneficiaries having the power of direction, said attorney, agent, licensed real estate salesperson, or broker need only identify the land trust which is the repository of record legal title and not the beneficiary or beneficiaries having the power of direction under the land trust agreement. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.805. DEEDS: Every doou shall oho~ the dote of the transaction which it evidences, the names of the grantor and grantee, and a legal descrip- tion 8.RVu. EXEMPT TRANSACTION: The tax imposed by this Chapter shall not apply to the following transactions, provided said transaction in each case is accompanied by u certificate setting forth the facts or such other certi- ficate of record or sworn statement as the Director of Finance may require at the time of filing of the declaration form: (x) Transactions involving property acquired by any governmental body; (8) Transactions in which the deeds secure debt or other obligations; (C) Transactions inwhich the deeds, without additional consideration, confirm, correct, modify or supplement deeds previously recorded; (D) Transactions in which the actual consideration is less tnmm five hundred dollars ($500,00); (E) Transactions in which the deeds are tax deeds; (F) Transactions in which the deeds are releases of property which is security for o uout or other obligation; (C) Transactions in which the deeds are pursuant to a court decree where there is no consideration; (V) Transactions made pursuant to mergers, consolidations, or transfers or sales of substantially all of the assets of a corporation pursuant to plans of reorganization; (l) Transactions between subsidiary corporations and their parents for no consideration other thum'tho cancellation or surrender of the subsidiary cocporationo'o stock; (J) Transactions wherein there is on actual exchange of real property except that the money difference or money's worth paid from one or the other shall not be exempt from the tax. (K) Transactions representing transfers subject to the imposition of o documen- tary stamp imposed by the government of the United Status, except that such uecuo shall not be exempt from filing the declaration. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87; Ord. 4021' 1-17-89) 8.807. EXEMPTIONS: The taxes imposed by this Chapter shall not be imposed on or transferred by an executor or administrator to a legatee, heir or distributes where the transfer is being made pursuant to will or by intnatacy. The tax imposed by this Chapter shall further be exempt where the transaction is orrvrteu by operation of low or upon delivery or transfer in the following instances, provided, however, that a declaration form is filed: (A) From o decedent to his executor or administrator; (B) From a minor to his guardian or from a guardian to his ward upon attaining majority; (C) From on incompetent to his conservator, or similar legal representative, or from a conservator or similar legal representative to o rnrmcc incompetent upon removal or disability; (D) From a bank, trust company, financial institution, insurance company or other similar entity, or nominee, custodian, or trustee therefor, to e public officer or commission, or person designated by such officer or commission or by o court, in the taking over or its oaouto, in whole or in port, under State or Federal law regulating or supervising such insti- tutions, or upon redelivery or cotronmpmr by any such transferee or successor thereto: ([) From m bankrupt or person in receivership dun to insolvency to the trustee in bankruptcy or receiver, from such nocoivac to such trustee or from such trustee to such receiver, or upon redelivery or rmtcenspmc by any such tranferee or successor thereto: (F) From o transferee under subsections (A) through (E), inclusive, to his successor acting in the same capacity, or from one such ourreoonz to (G) From truo:wwa to surviving, substitute, succeeding or additional trustees of the same trust; (H) Upon the death ofajoint tenant or tenant by the entirety tothe survivor or survivors. (Ocu. 3853, 9-1-87) 8.808, REVENUE STAMPS REQUIRED: The tax herein levied and imposed shall be collected by the Director of Finance or his designee for the Village through the sale or revenue stamps, ~xium shall be caused to be prepared by said Director or Finance in such quantities as said Director of Finance may from time to time prescribe. Such revenue stamps shall be in the denomination of one dollar ($1.00), five dollars ($5.00), ten dollars ($10.00), fifty dollars ($50.00), and one hundred dollars ($100.00). Such revenue stamps shall be available for sale at and during the regular business hours of the Village offices or at other locations designated by the Director or Financn. Upon payment or the tax herein levied and imposed, the revenue stamps so purchased shall be opfivou to the deed o, other instrument of conveyance. Any person so using and affixing o revenue stamp or stamps shall cancel it and so deface it as to render it unfit for use by marking it with his initials and the day, month and year when the affixing occurs. Such markings shall be made by writing or stamping in indelible ink or by perforating with a machine or punch. However, the revenue stamp(s) shall not be so defaced as to prevent ready determination or its denomination and genuineness. (Ord. 3833, *-1-87) 8.809, REAL ESTATE TRANSFER DECLARATION: FILING: x signed copy of the real estate transfer declaration filed pursuant to section 3 of the Real Estate Transfer Act of the State shall be filed with the village Clerk of the Village by the grantee or any deed or assignee of beneficial interest within ten (10) days after delivery of the uaeu or assignment of beneficial interest or at the time of payment of the tax herein levied or imposed, whichever first occurs. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.810. TRANSFER IN lRuSl; No trustee of real estate shall accept or acknowledge assignment of beneficial interest in real estate located in the Village without first obtaining o real estate transfer decla- ration from the assignor and assignee and vnIewa revenue stamps in the required amount, as set forth in this Chapter, have been affixed to the assignment. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.811. LIEN CREATED; ENFORCEMENT: In the event a deed is filed for recor- dation or there is an assignment of beneficial interest conveying real estate within the corporate limits of the Village without the revenue stamps provided by this Chapter, a lien is declared against said real estate 'conveyed in the amount of the tax. The fact that the deed or assignment does not contain a Village of Mount Prospect revenue stamp in an amount equal to two (2) times the amount of State transfer taxes shall constitute constructive notice of lien. The lien may be enforced by proceedings to foreclose, is in cases of mortgages or mechanics' liens. Suit to foreclose this lien must be commenced within three (3) years after the date of recording the deed. Nothing herein shall be construed as preventing the Village from bringing a civil action to collect the tax imposed by this Chapter from any person who has the ultimate liability for payment of the same, including interest and penalties as hereinbelow provided. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.812. ENFORCEMENT; SUIT FOR COLLECTION: Whenever any person shall fail to pay any taxes herein provided, or any purchaser or grantee shall accept a conveyance where the tax has not been paid, the Village's Corporation Counsel shall, upon request of the Village Manager, bring or cause to be brought an action to enforce the payment of said tax, including interest and penalties as hereinbelow provided, on behalf of the Village in any court of competent jurisdiction. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.813. INTEREST AND PENALTIES: In the event of failure by any person to collect and pay to the Director of Finance the tax required hereunder when the same shall be due, interest shall accumulate and be due upon said tax at the rate of one percent (1%) per month commencing as of the first day following the day when the tax becomes due. In addition, a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the tax and interest due shall be assessed and collected against any person who shall fail to pay the tax imposed by this Chapter. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.814. PROCEEDS OF TAX: All proceeds resulting from the imposition of the tax under this Chapter, including interest and penalties, shall be paid to the Village and shall be credited to and deposited in the general fund of the Village. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.815. PENALTY FOR VIOLATION: In addition to the remaining provisions of this Chapter, any person found guilty in a court of competent juris- diction of violating, disobeying, omitting, neglecting or refusing to comply with or resisting or opposing the enforcement of any provision of this Chapter., upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not less than two hundred dollars ($200.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.816. EFFECTIVE DATE: These provisions shall be in full force and effect as of November 1, 1987, provided, however, that these provisions shall not apply to contracts for the transfer of title or assignment of beneficial interest to real property executed prior to October 1, 1987. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) -6- 8.817. SEVERABILITY: Ifanyprovision, clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this Chapter, or application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall for any reason be adjudged by a court of competent juris- diction to be unconstitutional or invalid, said judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder of this Chapter and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, but shall be confined in its operation to the provision, clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered and to the person or circumstances involved. It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent of the Village Board of Trustees that this Chapter would have been adopted had such unconstitutional or invalid provisions, clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part thereof not been included. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) 8.818. PAYMENT OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER CHARGES: The Director of Finance shall issue no transfer tax stamps unless the Village Collector verifies that any delinquent water and sewer assessments and penalties related thereto are paid in full, and unless the declaration form contains information necessary for the billing and collection of the final water and sewer assessment charges. (Ord. 3833, 9-1-87) -7- SECTION 8.802 n. Any person who has paid the Real Estate Transfer rax at the three dollars ($;.UU) per one thousand dollar ($1,000) rate shall be entitled to a rebate of two dollars ($2,00) for each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of the purchase price, providing proper applica- tion has been mad* to the Village Treasurer and further provided that the person meets the following criteria: 1. Residential Property u. The person nnuU have owned and occupied a single-family residence, townhouse or condominium unit within the corporate boundaries of the Village of Mount Prospect as his principal n:omenco and said single-family residence, townhouse or condominium was evlu and the Real Estate Transfer Tax was paid within one year of the date of application for rebate; and *. The person purchases and occupies a single-family residence, townhouse or condominium within the Village or Mount Prospect as his principal residence, for which he has paid the Real Estate Transfer Tax of txcv, dollars ($3.80) per one thousand dollars ($),00O), within one year of the date of selling the previous residence located within the Village of Mount Prospect; or 2. Non -Residential Property u. The person shall have owned and operated a duly licensed business within the corporate boundaries of the Village of Mount Prospect and the property on which said oveincso was located was sold; and o. The person purchases non-residential property and operates a duly licensed business at said property as the principal uuoioeaa at said property within the Village of Mount Prospect, for which the Voa1 Estate Transfer Tax or three dollars ($).00) per one movaaoo dollars ($1,000) has been paid within one year of the Vetn of sale or the previous business property located within the village of Mount Prospect. Within JO oara following the receipt of Application for Rebate of Real Estate Transfer Tax, as provided herein, the Village Treasurer shall verify the information provided and if, in the opinion of the Village Treasurer, the applicable criteria has been met the Village |ccaovcer shall cause e warrant to be ieeu*u to the person applying for said rebate. (Ocd. 3833, 9-1-87; Ord. 4172, 4-17-90) (Please note the term "Person" u`cluuoa any individual or e,vuno or imuiviuuaza. Sea Section 8.e01,) VILI GE OF MOUNT PROS ECT PlAs NING AND ZONING DEPARTMh; vT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning DATE: August 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Home Occupations The Chamber has suggested that the Village consider adopting standards that would allow home occupations. Information from other municipalities has been provided by the Chamber for review by the Board. At the present time, Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance prohibits home occupations, and offices in homes, "except that a surgeon, physician, dentist, lawyer, clergyman, or other professional person using his residence for consultation, emergency treatment or the performance of religious rites only, and n t for the generalprofession,." However, what we find in the community is a wide range of inconspicuous home based businesses, many of which have Illinois revenue numbers. Home based businesses vary from contractor's offices, part-time caterers, artist studios, to computer consultants. Staff typically becomes aware of home occupation if it is one that disturbs neighbors. These matters are investigated on a complaint basis. The difficulty with the present requirements is that well-meaning residents call the Village Hall and inquire about opening a home business, and are advised that the Zoning Ordinance does not allow home occupations. In many cases, these residents are aware of other home occupations in the Village, and do not understand why they cannot gain approval. It would be appropriate to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow home occupations, if the home-based business met certain standards. For example, a home occupation should have no employees, display no sign, nor have any retail sales on premise. Also, no home occupation should include storage of supplies or inventory. Many communities regulate home occupations based on such performance standards, and this would be a reasonable approach for Mount Prospect to consider. If the Board so chooses, the Village Attorney and I could prepare a draft ordinance, and initiate a public hearing to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow home -occupations based on performance standards. Lastly, staff has noted short -comings in our Zoning Ordinance in the past. This subject is another example of how a new or revised Zoning Ordinance would better serve the community. DMC:cl HOME-BASED BUSINESSES BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY 1. Home-based business people are employed, 2. Home-based business people employ others. 3. Home-based businesses contribute to the Village through sales taxes. A recent article in the newspaper indicated that Mt. Prospect's sales taxes have decreased. By allowing home-based businesses and providing them visibility, they will contribute to this needed revenue. 4. Home-based business people provide additional safety for a residential neighborhood. With the trend toward two -income families, many neighborhoods are empty during the day. Home-based business owners would correct this situation. 5. Home-based business people make improvements to their properties which increases property value. 6. Home-based business people reduce the need for day care centers since there is someone at home to take care of the children, 7. Home-based business people reduce traffic levels since they do not have to commute, 8. Horne -based business people are more apt to purchase products and services locally to avoid unnecessary travel and wasting time. This benefits not only the local retailers but the Village as well through taxes. 9. Home-based businesses could provide additional income for the Village by being required to purchase a special home occupation permit or business license. 10. Home-based businesses allow entrepreneurs the opportunity to use their creativity and provide unique products and services to the community. (Examples: writers, artists, clowns, personal services, craft products, specialty newsletters, etc.) 11. Home-based businesses grow and expand moving out of their homes creating even more jobs and revenue for the Community. (Examples: Hewlett-Packard, Apple Computers, Lillian Vernon, Greyhound Bus, Pepperidge Farm, Cocas -Cola, Birdseye, Mrs. Field's Cookies, ect,) Statistics on Home -Based Businesses AT & T estimates that there are 23 million home-based businesses in the United States. This survey was taken in 1984 and it does not include home-based businesses that use their personal phone for business purposes. Dunn & Bradstreet has a mailing list of 700,000 people who work at home. The Department of Labor estimates that half of the American work force could be working from home in the next 10 to 15 years. Out of 13 Northwest communities that I personally surveyed and who responded, mt. Prospect and Wheeling are the only two who do not allow home-based businesses, The Mt. Prospect Chamber of Commerce has approximately 35-40 members who list their homes as their business address. Attached Documentation Model Zoning Ordinance prepared by the National Alliance of Homebased Businesswomen Effective Zoning Ordinances on Home Occupations from Northwest Communities. Home Occupations Ordinances in Effect in Area Villages Prepared by Janet V. Hansen President, Suburban Entrepreneurs of the Mt. Prospect Chamber of Commerce President, Northern Illinois Chapter of the Nat'l Alliance of Homebased Businesswomen ARLINGTON HEIGHTS --Home occupation. An accessory use of a dwelling unit carried on by members of the immediate family residing on the premises. The use is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the dwelling unit for residential purposes and does not change the character of the residence or adversely effect the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. All home occupations must comply with the standards in section 6.17. An application for a home occupation shall be filed with the Director of Building and Zoning. For all Home occupations, the following standards shall apply: I. No person other than members of the immediate family residing on the premises shall be involved or employed in the Home occupation. 2. There is used no sign other than a nameplate not more than one square fool in area or no display that will indicate from the exterior that the building Is being utilized in part for any purpose other than that of a dwelling unit. 3. No outdoor storage of materials or supplies related to the home occupation shall be permitted. 4. There shall be no increased noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference created by the Home Occupation. 5. No exterior aspect of this residential structure shall allow the home occupation to be reasonably recognized as a non-residential use. Permitted Home occupations: 1. office facility of a salesman, sales representative or manufacturers representative provided there is no manufacturing, production or storage on the premises and no more than one client on the premises at a time. 2. office facility of an architect, broker, engineer, insurance agent, computer programmer, dentist, physician for consultation only and not more than one client on the premises at a time. 3. Telephone answering service and office service to include typing, bookkeeping, transcribing and data entry. 4. Instructional services for not more than one pupil at a time. 5. Painting, sculpturing, writing and home crafts. Retail sale of such items in the home is prohibited. 6. Home product retail sales where orders are take at the home of others. Production, manufacturing and assembly of such product In the home Is prohibited. Prohibited Home occupations: Catering Services, Berber Shop and Beauty Salon, Motor Vehicle Repair, Restaurants, Tea Rooms, Commercial Stables, Kennels. Any proposed Horne occupation that is not specifically listed as permitted or prohibited may be considered a Special Use Permit subject to review and recommendation by the Plan Commission and approval by the Village Board based upon compliance with the performance standards. BARRIN6TON—A gainful occupation or profession carried on by an occupant of a dwelling unit, carried on wholly within the principal building or within a building accessory thereto, by only members of the family occupying the premises. No article shall be sold or offered for sale on the premises except such as produced by the occupation on the premises and no mechanical or electrical equipment shall be installed or maintained other than such as is customarily incidental to domestic use. There shall be no exterior display, no exterior sign except as allowed by the sign regulations for the district in which such "home occupation' or variation from the residential character of the principle building. offices, clinics, doctor's offices, hospitals, barber shops, beauty shops, millinery shops, tearooms, restaurants, tourist homes, animal hospitals and kennels, among others, shall not be deemed to be "home occupations.' BARTLETT--Home Occupation. 46 accessory use of a service character custom ear oly conducted within a dwelling by the residents thereof, which Is clearly secondary to the use of the dwelling for living purposes and does not change the character thereof or have any exterior evidence of such secondary use other than a small nameplate not more thand two (2) square feet in area, and in connection therewith there is not involved the keeping, sorting or maintaining of an inventory, equipment or machinery; there is no commodity sold upon or from the premises; no more than one (1) person Is employed, other than a member of the Immediate family residing on the premises; no more than three (3) pupils, clients or customers can be present at the some time; no mechanical equipment is used except such as is normally used for purely domestic or household purposes and no commercial vehicle in connection, with home occupation is stored or parked except within a fully enclosed and closed private garage. BUFFALO GROVE --A home occupation shall be defined as a gainful occupation or profession customarily carried on by an occupant of a dwelling unit as a use which is clearly incidental to the use of the dwelling unit For residential purposes. Standards for Home Occupations --In addition to all of the standards applicable to the district in which it is located, any home occupation shall comply with the following standards: 1. Every home occupation shall be carried on entirely within the principal building and only by members of the family occupying the premises. 2. No article shall be sold or offered for sale on the premises. 3. No wholesale, jobbing or retail business shall be permitted unless it is conducted entirely by mail and/or telephone and does not involve the receipt, sale, shipment, delivery or storage of merchandise on or from the premises. 4. No mechanical or electrical equipment shall be installed or maintained other than such as is customarily incidental to domestic use. S. All vehicles and all supplies used in the home occupation must be contained within an enclosed building and all vehicles must be garaged when not being used in the occupation. 6. There shall be no exterior display, no exterior signs (except as allowed by the sign regulations for the district in which such "home occupation" is located), no exterior storage of materials, and no other exterior indication of the "home occupation" or variation from the residential character of the principal building. 7. No home occupation shall be operated in such a manner as to cause offensive noise, vibration, smoke or other particulate matter, heat, humidity, glare, electronic interference, odors, or otherwise constitute a nuisance or safety hazard to the occupants of nearby properties. 8. No alteration of the principal building shall be made which changes the character thereof as a dwelling. Home Occupations Prohibited --Clinics, doctors' offices, hospitals, barber shops, beauty parlors, dress shops, millinery shops, tearooms, restaurants, tourist homes, animal hospitals, real estate offices, manufacturing businesses, repair shops of any kind, and child care centers or nursing homes where care is provided for more than three persons other than family members. CARPENTERSVILLE--Home Occupation. Any occupation or profession carried on by a member of the immediate family, residing on the premises, conducted entirely within the dwelling in connection with which there is used no sign other than a non -illuminated nameplate attached to the dwelling, not more than one square foot in area, no exterior storage of materials or equipment, or no display that will Indicate from the exterior that the building is being utilized In whole or in part for any purpose other than that of a dwelling; there is a no commodity sold upon the promises except that prepared on the premises; no person is employed other than a member of the Immediate family residing on the premises; and no mechanical equipment is used except such as is customary for purely domestic household purposes; and the home occupation use Is secondary or incidental to the dwelling use. 1. There shall be no noise, odor, dust, vibration, smoke, glare, television or radio interference, electrical Interference, fire hazard, or any other hazard or nuisance emanating from the structure containing the home occupation other than that usually experienced in an average dwelling under normal circumstances wherein no home occupation exists. 2. Instruction or teaching shall be limited to no more than two pupils at a time. 3. Floor area used for the home occupation shall not occupy more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total floor area of the dwelling on the lot containing the home occupation. 4. No commodity shall be sold or services rendered that require receipt or delivery of merchandise, goods, or equipment by other than a passenger motor vehicle or by parcel or letter carrier mail service. 5. No more than one home occupation per dwelling unit Is permitted. 6. No home occupation that requires the use or storage of namable materials in excess of five (5) gallons. No care for humans except child day care in single family dwellings (as defined in this Chapter 5) for three (3) or fewer children during all or part of the day. Home occupation shall not include the care or treatment of animals, including, but not by way of limitation, birds, dogs, cats, fowl, fish, and reptiles. Other home occupations not permitted include mortuaries, half way houses, private clubs, rental of equipment or machinery from the premises, restaurants, repair shops (except the repair of small items such as portable electric appliances, radios, cameras, typewriters, and other similar items), tourists homes, stables, kennels, or message parlors. DES PLAINES--Home Occupation. Any occupation or profession carried on by a member of the immediate family, residing on the promises, in connection with which there is used no sign other than a name plate not more than one square foot In area, or no display that will indicate from the exterior that the building Is being utilized in whole or in part for any purpose other than that of the dwelling; or where there is no commodity sold upon the premises; no person is employed on the premises other than a member of the Immediate family residing on the premises; and no mechanical equipment is used except such as is permissible for purely domestic or household purposes. HT. PROSPECT --The following uses are spocincelly excluded from the R-1 District: A professional office, except that a surgeon, physician, dentist, lawyer, clergyman, or other professional person using his residence for consultation, emergency trootment, or the performance of religious rites only and not for the general practices of his profession. PALATINE --Home Occupation includes but is not limited to the following: Art studio, day care home, dressmaking, professional office of a clergyman, lawyer, physician, dentist, architect, engineer or accountant, when located in a dwelling unit occupied by the same; teaching, with musical Instruction limited to one pupil at a time. However, 'home occupation` shall not be construed to include the following: Clinic or hospital; barber shop or beauty parlor; commercial stable, kennel, or animal grooming parlor or establishment; tourist home; real estate office; or restaurant. Home occupations, when carried on within a dwelling unit and not in any accessory building, by a person who lives in the principal building and where no nameplate is used in connection with the professional occupational use which exceeds one square foot in area. PARK RIDGE --The purpose of the Home Occupations provisions is to permit the conduct of a part-time business for supplemental income purposes within the Residential Districts provided such occupations are limited to those activities which may be carried on within a residential dwelling without in any way changing Its appearance or condition or adversely affecting the uses permitted in the Residential District of which it is a part, General Provisions, Conditions and Performance Standards: in all REsidential Districts, home occupations, as defined herein, shall be permitted provided that the following conditions and standards are fully met: t. The home occupation is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the dwelling for residential purposes; 2. The occupation is conducted entirely within the dwelling, and no more than (1) room or one-fourth (1/4) of the gross area of a single floor of said dwelling, whichever is less, shall be used for such purpose. Use of attached or detached accessory building for home occupation purposes is prohibited; 3. No home occupation shall require internal or external alteration of the dwelling In which It is conducted, nor involve construction features or the use of materials or equipment not customarily associated with a dwelling. The entrance to the space devoted to such occupation shall be only from within the dwelling; 4. The home occupation shall not involve the use of advertising signs on the promises nor any other local advertising media which call attention to the fact that the dwelling Is being used for non-residential purposes; 5. There shall be no display, activity or environmental manifestation that will indicate from the exterior of the dwelling In which a home occupation is being conducted that said dwelling is being used in whole or In part for any other then residential purposes, nor shall the home occupation create noise, dust, vibration, smell, smoke, glare, electrical Interference, fire hazard, or any other hazard or nuisance to any greater or more frequent extent than that usually experienced in an average residential occupancy within the Residential District in question under normal circumstances wherein no home occupation exists; 6. The home occupation shall be conducted by one or more members of the family residing in the dwelling in question and shall not involve the employment of anyone other than members of the resident family; SCHAUMBUR6--Home occupation. Any activity or accessory use conducted In a dwelling unit for financial gain by a member of the household residing therein, which is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the dwelling unit for residential purposes. Home occupations shall be permitted as accessory or secondary uses in all residential districts subject to the provisions of this Article V, Section 16. The standards for home occupations specified in this Section are intended to insure compatibility with other permitted uses and with the residential character of the neighborhood, plus a clearly secondary or incidental status in relation to the residential use of the dwelling as the criteria for determining whether a proposed accessory use qualifies as a home occupation. Permitted Home Occupations - Home occupations shall be permitted only in accordance with the following use regulations: 1. The home occupation shall be accessory and secondary to the use of the dwelling for residential purposes and shall not occupy more then twenty -rive (25 percent of the total floor area of all permitted structures on the lot containing the home occupation. 2. There shall be no signs, activity or display that will indicate from the exterior that the building is being used, in part, for any purpose other than that of a dwelling. 3. There shall be no special structural alterations or construction features, either permanent or accessory, to the dwelling or permitted accessory structures, no the Installation of special equipment to wails, floors or ceilings, which would change the residential character of the dwelling or accessory structure. 4. Except for those home occupations involving the care of children, home occupations and all related activity, including storage, shall be conducted completely within the dwelling and permitted accessory structures. 5. There shall be no commodities sold or services rendered that require receipt or delivery of merchandise, goods or equipment other than a passenger motor vehicle or by parcel or letter carrier mail service. 6. The home occupation and any related activity shall not create any traffic hazards or nuisances in the public streets nor require more vehicle parking than exists on the residential drive or assigned parking spaces servicing the dwelling unit. 7, Theres shall be no noise, odor, dust, vibration, smoke, glare, television or radio interference, electrical interference, fire hazard or any other hazard or nuisance emanating from the structure containing the home occupation other than that usually experienced in an average dwelling under normal circumstances wherein no home occupation exists. 8. No article can be sold or offered for sale except as may be produced on the premises. 9. No person shall be employed other than a member of the immediate family residing in the dwelling unit. Home Occupations Requiring Special Use Approval --Certain home occupations by their very nature require additional review in the form of a Special Use permit to insure the promotion of the public health, safety, comfort and welfare. The following home occupations require Special Use approval: Any home occupation not complying with all, or part, of the requirements specified In this Article. Any home occupation that requires the use or storage of flammable materials in excess of five (5) gallons. Any dwelling or lot containing more than one home occupation. Any home occupation that requires the handling of food or foodstuffs. Any home occupation that requires the care or treatment of animals, including birds, fowl, fish and reptiles. Any home occupation including day care homes that requires the care or treatment of humans; except for those home occupations which receive three or fewer children for card during all or part of the day. WHEELING --Does not allow home-based businesses. No home occupation shall involve the use of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials, supplies, merchandise or equipment to or from the dwelling where such occupation is being conducted. All such deliveries shall be strictly limited to those customarily provided by carrier mail service or to those utilizing the passenger automobile of the person conducting the home occupation; No more than 6 (6) cubic feet of space within a dwelling may be utilized for storage of materials, supplies, merchandise or equipment related to any or all home occupations conducted therein. Outdoor storage or storage in attached or detached accessory buildings is strictly prohibited; and The home occupation shall not generate automobile or pedestrian traffic of a greater volume than would usually be expected within the Residential District in question under normal circumstances wherein no home occupation exists. Any need for parking generated by the conduct of a home occupation shall be off-street parking provided on the premises of said occupation in accordance with the parking requirements for the Residential District in question and with the provisions of Section 9.00. PROSPECT HEI6HTS--Home Occupations. In all Residence Districts an occupation operated for profit shall be permitted provided that: (all references to garages are restricted to the R-1 zoning district only.) A. It is conducted entirely within the dwelling or from within a garage by a member of the family residing in the dwelling, and when such home occupation is incidental and secondary to the use of dwelling for dwelling purposes; B. Not more than one-fourth (1/4) of the total floor area of any one story of a dwelling and one-fourth (1/4) of the total area of one garage is devoted to such home occupation; C. it does not require internal or external alteration not customary in a dwelling or garage; D. There is no display, activity, or noise that will indicate from the exterior of the dwelling that it is being used in whole or in part for any use other than dwelling or garage except that one (1) unanimated, non -illuminated sign of not more than three (3) square feet in size may identify the home occupation. Further, no stock in trade is kept or sold, including also such as are made on the premises, or services rendered on the premises that require a receipt or delivery of merchandise, goods or equipment by other than carrier mail service, United Parcel Service or similar type delivery service, or a Class B license size vehicle of the person conducting the home occupation; E. A home occupation conducted by a professional person or person rendering personal services shall be only for consultation, emergency treatment, instruction, or performance of religious rites; F. Teaching of musical lessons and dancing shall be conducted only in a single-family detached dwelling and then to not more than ten (10) pupils at one (1) time in a single family detached dwelling, and not more than three (3) pupils at one (1) time In any other dwelling unit. ROLLING MEADOMfS--Home occupation. An occupation carried on as a special use approved by the city council in a dwelling by the resident thereof, not involving the conduct of a retail business or manufacturing business. Home occupations, further, shall not include employment of any additional persons in the performance of such services; nor shall there be any mechanical equipment used other than is usual for purely domestic or hobby purposes. There shall be no exterior display or sign except as allowed in the sign regulations for the district in which such "home occupation' is located, and there shall be no exterior storage of equipment or materials used in connection with the home occupation. Home occupations shall be permitted as defined and regulated by the comprehensive zoning code of the City of Rolling Meadows. It shall be unlawful for any person to conduct or engage In a home occupation In the city without having first obtained a license therefor. Application for licenses required by this division shall be made in writing to the license officer on a form provided by him. No such license shall be issued to any person not complying with all of the applicable provisions of the ordinances of the City of Rolling Meadows. The annual license fee for a home occupation shall be twenty dollars ($20.00). Planning It Zoning News .3 JWYA,ig THE REGULATION OF HOME OCCUPATIONS INTRODUCTION litany Americans are returning to the centuries old IraditV, Of earning their Mined lead at home This trend hiss resulted in the inevitable conflicts between the Home Sweet Hil advocates who are desirous of V ' luding all rhon�rycidedlof use$ from their ravildborhoods; and the entreplaneurs who seek the rrany advantages of ciahnisming work Place with their residence While public hearings On multimufflon delta r municipal budgets are often Poorly attended, a stroug, request by a hobbyist who wishes "41chborbnall for a part-time business such as building birdhouses in his basement, May fact formidable opposition from troll cent homeowners. Unfortunately, all too often acted 0on5 to home occupations "inask" other cornplanals such as the fact that the nelthinfif diuvasn'r mow his Lawn Often enough Of his dog barks too much The methods of regulating home occupations are as varied as the business activities which are conducted in dwelling units, Many communities adopt the lutlude that if the neighbors don't register a complaint about a home business the osumcdpuhtjy certainly does not wish to create a Probiens by inve0ganng the situation or ar, lisrMuting to refulatty, it. However, organized opposition to overzealous Zoning controls is becoming more com. nuart Coranee Kern, author of a brinonbly publication entitled "Mind Your Own Business at Hmmei% has slated hOlue based businesses Hoye several formidable obstacles to Overcome, "zoning Saws are the worst bill the lax sifuchirst also hampers people who want to work at home". POPULARITY Alvin Tobjer, author of Future Shocil has stated that, "The single ants/ unproductive Ming we do is send bacteria true-CrOSSM9 the ondirloply to work mksny, day, " More and more Americans are abandoning the conventional work day routine and Opting for a home based enterprise According to the L,S, Chamber of Commerce "at ntuast iti Million bfds,n,-vsoq are ill in American homes. chat is the number or indivrduars Who list home address,$ Oil IRS forms as sole buslofss cud0fifl This is a SO- increase from a decade ago — Many factors are contributing to the Popularity Of home occupations including the fvflkawmgf: I Quality Of Life People who work at home, can spend more time on the job and avoid commuter hassles such as trallic jams. Working at home could Provide more flexible work Schedules and result in less absenteeism Home-based employment is more advantageous for Physically handicapped Workers, 2 Costs — Renting commercial floor space, commuting and Parking result in high costs for the typical urban work place. — The cost of work space, ne0ePtionis and utilities is partially covered in an individual's mortgagerlease payment, — Entrepreneurs can "test" a business idea with a minimum financial investment. — Home business madrecifs may be able to deduct a portion Of their refit or depreciate the value at their homes on their lederM Hudome taxes. — Residents of rural areas Who work in urban areas may be able to avoid city income taxes by a Change it, the work place, 3, Technology — The advent of he commuter age has scitivined the term "electronic cottage" and enabled many at, fice dersormpt to perform common office tasks at a home work statical, 4. Child Care Many Pare' oTIS Prefer to stay M home in order to tend to their PreSchooi Children rattler than ""warehousing" them in a day care center. 5 Poor Economy Oce"'Rulins in the economy liarce many laid off workers to seek alternative forms of employment which might take the form Of converting a bobby to a fuffl4mas based occupation. COMMON COMPLAINTS Citizens who Oppose home occupations can be quite Creative and vocal in their demands The following com. rilistrits are among the most commimly expressed: I They (home occupations) will result in decreased Properly values, 2 They generate significant amounts of traffic resulting in safety hazards to children and a "Mminulnel of Quietude", 3 They will bring Strangers into the neighborhood which could reach in assaults on children and pro" pert, related crimes, 4 They will cause the character of the neighborhood to Change from residential to commercial. 5 Thist, murisfircile a violation of deed restrictions/pri- 1wate covenants. 6 Their Possess the Potential lot negative operational cheractill ics such as noise, electrical interference, lire hazard and diminished aesthetics. 7. Businessman oppose them, staffing that they rapre, sent small Competition because the costs of conduc ling business are less, resulting in the ability of the home occupation to offer a similar product/service at a lower cast, It is Often alleged fuel they create additional dervand$ 101 public services such as Polictlyfive, responses, garbage torck-up and Sanitary arrive, water and storm drarnatte services which home- owner's are forced to bear, 9. Union leaders coriband that they can result in wage and hour violations, child labor abuse and the loss of office and factory Mos DEFINITIONS Perhaps tire most Important decision when, considering regulation at home occupations is the drafting of a defuntion. Art all encompassing definition should pro• voile the basic na"nowfork to,, more specific lopshoriel, operational, and site development standards pral ing 10 home occuttal4ons. The Illustrated Book of Curveloinuffert Diffirritions; alters the tollowinvil Home Occupation: Any activity carried out for gain by a resident conducted as an accessory use in the resident's dwelling unit, I Several suggestions are offered when considering definitions: IncrucHnill regfulallons in the definition should be avoided It an individual convinces a Judge that the lefinghon is not aimulicaddle to them, then neither are the accompanying regulations. Older ordinances often contained phrases such as "busruesses c(Orrism,31fly and lorditionally caudad On or it,& home" Pity the Poor can g ad m i n 4ar"a'Ito, r who has to determine whether barber shops and baby sailing are traditional, whereas income tax Presimathin and Plants reaching constitute non- traditional, commercial activities, DehnitiOnS occasionally recognize'"professional"` orcipuflons such as doctors and lawyer's' while pro, ho ding 40 other home,based business enterprises, A community may have difficulty justily4ng to a Court marfluenhal treatment Of "PrOle%lime" occohodions while luldfiling an exclusionary policy for others Decision makers should ask themselves wtit Specific types of business activities they wish lia regulate, Dialmillons can be interpreted to include pill sales, hiline SaktVdistributors such as A' way, Avon avid Tupperware and even those nwi. bill" operations which consist merely of lecelvirig telephone falls, mail, and record keeping (and which generate no traffic), PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS A review of local home rotorlahon regulations generally reveals that while the specific regulations may vary, there is uniformity in the Common issues which area cl dressed, The following discussion, notes prod! which may be experienced In addressing these n' most common issues 11 Should employees other than family members be per- mitted? P ohibiling employees c ,mls�fturys a virtual p I xclu, Sion for certain Thollesluons which typically utilize employees Such as doctors wikh nurses, attorneys with legal secretaries, prolessionat writers with secretaries, etc. The definition of "family" in many zoning or- dinances permits 2 or 3 unrelated individ Sell no live together and yet many of these same or- dinances ,dinances; prohibit unrelated individuals to work together as a home o ruflallon, Ordinances Prohibit employees wvill a d5l,fica. turn of latter.minng to maif,larn hwinensity at.. livitnes and yet they *train permit an ununited number of related family mernplars no be employed in a home Occupation, Limitations on flovar area devoted to home occupations, — Many ordinances (elate the maximum size of a home occ,,min- in n 1—ifi-4 I.r ... 1— �l — dwelling's floor area which rewards those "th Burger houses — Floor area irritations are an attempt at incur lcr that home -" Pations w0l be Incidental mina„'1 a dc' principal p'e flowever, a number o high � ty uses, $rich as photo sludlr,s and beauty s,!ttn which schedule frequent appointments, c", copy small spaces RecIrschons on the amount of vool area -?h the diveflinig may resuat in relocations t+l buthfings all as sheds and garages HOW is The yPlCWJY overworkal zon,mi i,l mulistr8b)" going to Monitor a number cf Occupations to insure that each Of train due, exceed a specific square footage limitation 7 3 Should Safe at merchandise be permitted? Prohibiting sales would fur dude a tPilmd-w, number of common home occupations hobbyists, weavers) which are generally sudered 35 acceptable users in recrt-i,i neighbodniods. Ordinances omen PnhMt the sale of ahsfilq I Inerniaclived or' assembled on the Now does the xodnr�fl dura, whether such ill as arts and crafts liel a, "homemade" or C , whignment Items? How can one enforce a laaa$ prohibition whet, sale takes place via the amephone, mail or v deem, puler terminal? — Prohibiting sales could be mromilmem with il, hOrne occupation thahnifitan which Play imply sales are an inherent characteristic — Bantling window or yard displays of Hiercha,11,, would appear to be reasonable in order t,, w, serve the residential appearance and char;irtcr of a neighborhood I Traffic Generation — The generation of frill by thave occupatofl, rs chair the Most Observable tharractran5l al,l h., the Potential so become the most 1,oub, r, Ordinances May Use the traffic issue as a nf— lot determining whether or not a prohn,i business activity in a residential dwelling ro` slifillos; a home raccupishon — If is fairly y common 10 See clauses' Such as 1 77I, home occupation may not generate mom 1,ol lic than would occur m the typical ortifthbolhood" These clauses are itirlb,il"011i and do not ona,vide a measurable standardgoo, I � Institute of traffic Engineer"s ""Trip Gurn I By Land Use'" estimates that the typicivin'si,iii'l, family home generates 10 "trips" per day — Specifying that a mare occuls4flor, Shah not '0,0, In Clore than 2 or 3 Parked vehicies; on Ow nnilim5 than the athmIchaahr, intends to cm,wi, the sul,m0lonce still enforcement nerulysitai,, Such a Provision Controls should be considered for horina occ,¢jp, bons which may generate significant traffic p,, example, hinifill the number of Students en, i o ad in ceramic and aerobic classes would b, direct effect on the number of trips iterhyraitil Concerns regarding traffic generation and 1hrk Possible hazards to school children IS a cam =+ citizen complaint voiced it) opposition to horl)­, cuolihons, Permit Transterance — Many communities authorize home occlariul'n,,,, "'tough Special use Permits. A special use pett,dn is typically granted for a particular property ,j re"l in effect regardless of a change in rawer5 hit) yet, local decision makers often grafIf I,, mile on the basis of "Personalities" rather 111tn late specific factors such as ideation and bholqji, size — Sorria, ordinances contain a provision spell,r, that a home orcupanon $hall Germinate u v'r, "Original" operator discontinues the busn,es,, Such a regulation could be difficull to Justify it olf, flew Operator agreed to conduct the bus"MI's tinder the Same terms which applied to the ire, vious operator. Since the aroMnal zoning apornvii runs with the hand and mal the PrObifl termination of approval with transfer of proui-iv could weal be ruled illegal if challenged, Inappropriate Uses — Some business activities which are popu[2lf in home occuoahons possess operational (jjara(j, Planning d Zoning News'' Istics which may create problems: Use Problems Beauty Shops Hair clogs drains, traffic generation Photo Studios Chemicals in drains, traffic generation Instructional Classes Insufficient exits for fire safety, traffic generation Upholstering Burning discarded materials, large volumes of waste Small Engine Repair Noise, fire hazard Furniture Refinishing Chemical Disposal — Communities may wish to exclude the aforemen. tioned inappropriate uses via the implementation of a prohibited uses list. 7. Zoning Districts — Determining in which zoning districts home oc. cupations should be perrr.ltted, is often a difficult task for local governments. Many ordinances limit home occupations to single family districts with the justification that densities and land use intern sities are too high, while parking is too limited in multiple family districts. Such an argument may not have merit for lower intensity uses such as typing and sewing which could be conducted in an apartment dwelling (absent negative impacts to the neighbors). — Two-family dwellings pose a problem when an in- dividual intends to live in one unit and convert the entire floor space in the other unit to a home occupation, --- Lease agreements for rental dwellings often ex clude nonresidential uses in the dwelling which would generally include home occupations. LEGAL ISSUES Enabling Legislation The State of Vermont recently passed legislation recognizing the right of home occupations to exist in dwellings within small villages. Michigan statutes do not specifically recognize home occupations. However, neither do any statutes prohibit local units of govern. ment from regulating home occupations. Michigan's zoning enabling acts authorize use of the special land use technique which permits designated uses in various districts upon a finding that a zoning ordinance's stan- dards and requirements have been met. Many or. dinances utilize the special use technique to authorize home occupations. Constitutional Issues There are a number of basic constitutional considers - lions which should be considered when drafting home occupation regulations. Several of these issues are reviewed below. Due Process—The community's procedural and substantive mechanism for authorizing home occupa lions should correspond to a rational relationship w,th legitimate governmental goals such as the lessening of I congestion and maintenance of the residential character of a neighborhood. Exclusion—Ordinances which totally prohibit home oc- cupations from a community could face a challenge that the ordinance is exclusionary. The community might argue that it is seeking to prevent a nuisance thereby mutually benefitting all property owners in the area. Anti Trust—An ordinance may contain provisions limiting the number of home occupations in an area via a spacing (dispersion) requirement which could result in an anti-trust case. It could be argued that limitations on the number or location of home occupations con- slitute an unreasonable restraint of trade and restrict freedom of competition, Communities should be prepared to justify the basis for. such restrictive measures. Free Speech—An ordinance prohibiting home occupa. tions from advertising on radioltelevision has been in- validated by at least one court as an unconstitutional restraint on one's first amendment rights. The court found that the municipality must show a "substantial governmentai interest", not merely a "legitimate in - latest" The "Right" to Work at Home—In the celebrated Ver. mont Home Knitters case, the court found that sewing/ knitting work conducted in the home, constituted a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 which contained restrictions on working in the home in an ef. fort to prevent "sweatshops". A recent Wali Street Journal Editorial noted organized Labor's attempts to limit work at home,. "While the federal homework restrictions are limited to knitting, sewing and other crattwork, at least 18 states and the District of Columbia have evert more onerous prohibitions extending to manufacturing and assembly work. Now, the AFL CIO would like to see the restrictions extended to include the most promising areas of new technology -the home computer; al their conven- tion last October, union leaders voted in favor of banning computer homework. Sol Chaikin, AFL. CIO vice president and head of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, said recently in support of a federal ban on computer homework that "we cannot afford to wall for a new history of exploftation, wage and hour violations, child labor abuse, and loss of office and factory jobs to homework in that (the computer) field."' The Journal's editorial staff wholeheartedly supported the work at home movement. "Rather than impeding the proliferation of homework, the Federal and State governments should move quickly to eliminate the existing restrictions. The America would truly be the home of opporfunify."1 NON -ZONING LAWS It is often incorrectly assumed that regulation of home occupations is solely limited to zoning ordinance regula. tions, The following discussion points out non -zoning laws and regulations which could have an impact on the operation of a home occupation. Barrier Free Design Laws In December of 1980 the Michigan Department of Labor's, Bureau of Construction Codes issued an inter pretation, with the concurrence of the Office of the At- torney General, regarding barrier tree compliance in existing, privately owned single-family dwellings, The Bureau determined that if the primary status of the dwelling is its use as a home, then it is not classified as a facility used by the public and the structure does not have to comply with the provisions of the Barrier Free Design Law (Act 177, P.A. 1975), The law contains standards pertaining to physical construction features such as access ramps, extra wide doorways and bath- room stalls, etc, in order to publicly accommodate those with filched mobility. The majority of home oc. cupation ordinances stipulate that a home occupation is an accessory use which corresponds to the Bureau's interpretation that the primary use of a dwelling Itous. ing a home occupation, is as a residential use. Catering The Food Service Sanitation Ordinance adopted pur. suant to Part 129 of the Michigan Public Health Code defines food service establishments. The definition specifically excludes private homes. Additional provi- sions In the Ordinance result in a prohibition from preparing food in a private home and transporting it elsewhere for public consumption. Catering for wed- ding receptions and graduation parties is the type of small business which appeals to many as a possible home occupation, Caterers licensed by the Department of Public Health are often quick to alert local officials of home caterers who provide competition and could en- danger the public's health, Licensing Many occupations which are popular as home occupa- tions require licensing by the State of Michigan such as cosmotologists, land surveyors and medicalidental prac- tices. Uniform Traffic Code Home occupations may result in on -street parking for extended periods of time. Section 28.1814(1)(3) of the Uniform Traffic Code, which is adopted by many Michigan communities, prohibits the parking of a vehi- cle in a public street for more than 48 continuous hours. Day Care Baby sitting is a "traditional" home occupation which is becoming more popular as the percentage of women in the work force increases, Act 116 of 1973 specifically provides for the licensing of child care organizations by the Michigan Department of Social Services. The Act defines family day care homes as private homes in which 1 but less than 7 minor children are received for care and supervision for periods of less than 24 hours a day, unattended by a parent. Such homes, which in. clude the majority of home baby sitting situations, are required to be registered by the Bureau of Regulatory Service's Division of Child Day Care Centers and must comply with specified requirements pertaining to issues such as fire safety arid sanitation. The Bureau advises prospective Day Care providers to check with zoning officials in additions to obtaining the necessary registration from the State. Building Codes Most Michigan communities operate under the Uniform Building Code (UBC) or the Building Officials Code of America (BOCA) or the State Construction Code (a variation of BOCA), Alterations to residential structures often precede the establishment of a home occupation including such improvements as installing additional doorways, plumbing improvements and interior walls. Many zoning ordinances contain a provision prohibiting any structural modifications for a home occupation but July/August 19B4 ouch a prohibition could prevent alterations to acrom modiste barrier -tree entrances and fire walls to improve safety conditions. Fire Codes The Uniform Fire Code is utilized by many local Il- departments. The code contains a number at regula tions which could apply to home occupations such is the storage of flammable materials (furniture rn finishing), the use of mechanical or electrical equip- ment which would result in a change in the fire rannt; of the structure (welding) and the need to provide addi tional ingress and egress to public occupancy areas for home occupations, especially basements, Private Covenants The majority of private covenants (deed restrictions) pertaining to single family subdivisions exclude business and commercial activities. Many homeowners interport such exclusionary clauses as being applicahle to horse occupations. Clashes often occur when local decision makers authorize home occupations via zoning p n cadures while homeowners defiantly wave their deed restrictions, This is a controversial area because zonh,rt laws cannot Impair restrictive covenants which wo,d;i constitute a governmental Infringement on the terms of a private contract. On the other hand, the private cove. cant is riot enforceable by the municipality unless it is n party to it—an unlikely situation. LITIGATION Swprisingly little litigation has been generated by home occupations in spite of the controversy often generated by such activities, In 1+981 the Michigan Court of Appeals determined that conducting proles social counseling Is not a use "customrn y incidential" to residential occupancy nor is it a perndl ted accessory use in a single family district.' Many zom ing ordinances allow "customarily incidental usesin single family neighborhoods which could be interpreted to include such activities as baby sitting, sewing and typing services. The Michigan Supreme Court in 1980 reversed a lo,er court decision which had held that a community co Wrf adopt an ordinance prohibiting parking of largo vehicles in specific residential areas' Many ordinances prohibit the parking of large, commercial. type vehicle-. on residentially zoned properties which could limit II." use of service vehicles by home occupations. In 1982, the Michigan Court of Appeals permitted the establishment of a licensed day care center for seven children in the lace of a challenge by a homeowners association that the use violated a restrictive coveri:vd limiting use of property for "residential purposes ' The Court said that while nonresidential uses I. general may violate the restrictive covenant, a rion residential use may conform it it is "casual, infrequent, unobtrusive and not harmlut to property values " I1,o court concluded the obtrusiveness of morning s,id afternoon traffic was outweighed by the strong public policy for family day care centers' TYPICAL REGULATIONS It is a common fact of life that people are very proles tive of the neighborhoods in which they live as is evidenced by the popular saying of "not in n,r backyard you don't"' On the other hand, a Sunday afternoon drive through most residential areas reveals the existence of many nonresidential activities which typically take place in and around people's dwellings As a prerequisite to draling home occupation regida tions, community leaders should conduct a series of discussions which attempt to define the type of residen- flat neighborhoods which are desired. Formulating quantitive measures for dimensional regulations (set backs, lot area, lot coverage, etc.) is relatively easy in comparison to addressing "sticky" issues such as recreational vehicle parking, the definition of family, and home occupations, Consideration should be given to varying home occupy I regulations for various residential areas. A ban on most home occupations in high density areas may I, TRENDS IN HOME OCCUPATIONS Forbes Magazine estimates that by September 1983, there were 10,000 to 20,000 "felecommuters" or persons working at home with computers. Business Week reported In January Boal 200 U.S. Companies are experimenhng with some form of tefecom. muting and that triple than 30 have, format telecommuting programs, Within a decade, 18% of the workforce, of 18 million people will be delecorionl irrg and that over the next two decades, most people in all levels of business will work at home at least 2"3 daysfweek. Advocates of telecommuting insist that inex• pensive new technology such as facsimile transmitters, will remedy many of the difficulties that pilot pro grams have suffered. USA Today says that no one is ready to predict that faleconfmplars will eliminate the need for offices. When New York Telephone offered the telecommuting option to workers in the company's marketing and human resources department last year, city dwellers said they dill not want to be capped up in their tiny Manhattan aparmeri single workers didn't warn to miss the chances for socializing in an office; and one family Wean turned down the offer because he didn't want to be home with his mother lml'aw every day. Gannet News reports that at least 10 million businesses are run in American homes, according to the US Chamber of Commerce. That's how many list home addresses on the IRS form for sole business proprietors. The Wall Street Journal reported in February that a recent AT&T study found 7% of the total American labor force work at home full time, and that 6% pursue part time jobs at home. A 2.450 acre subdivisacm of one -acre lots in Southhampton County, California. are being prewired for the „high tacit age" according to USA Today, Each has combined electrical outlets and dual telephone lines at two locations in each house, The developer reports "A compuferweady house is going to be that Much more atlrill to buyers who can order and finance computer equipment up to '$3,500 in value along with new homes. Planning g Zoning News` .5 defensible where parking is limited and space is ;. premium. Likewise, an exclusion of welding shops lydam i/ acre lot subdivisions would appear to make sense, but such a use could satisfy a need in five acre, country -estate type areas without posing any im- mediate negative impacts to the area. A brief analysis of some of the most popular methods of regulating home occupations is provided below. it is en. tirely possible, and in fact desirable in many situations, to combine methods; for example allowing some home occupations "by right" while permitting others by special land use permit, homeowners have consti- No Zoning Regulations tutional rights to operate Pros Cons —Avoids administrative —Provides no "safe - costs, places reliance on guards" to adjacent other non zoning laws residents, constitutes an which are not the re- "anything goes" ap. sponsibility of local proach. government. personal property taxes. Permitted/Prohibited Uses List Pros Cons --Easiest to administer, —A prohibited use list government only should be justified by a becomes involved with showing as to how a rea. interpretations of pro sdnable governmental in- spective uses or when terest is being advanced problems with existing as per the Supreme uses arise, Court's Kropf v. Sterling Heights decision (391. Mich 139 (1974) —Inflexible approach, in- evitably "boarderfine" uses will arise necessitating intermeta. !ions or variances by the Zoning Board of Appeal. —Often results in lengthly lists attempting to address and categorize all possible uses an impossibility. Special Use Permit Pros Cons —Provides for maximum—Time consuming and control in that requests may result in over regu. are reviewed on a case lation of inconspicuous, by case basis and stipu. low intensity uses., lations may be attached. —Expensive due to ---Citizen input may be newspaper ads, citizens provided via a public notification, staff reports hearing provision, and public hearings. --Potential nuisance pro- Michigan's enabling Mems can be addressed legislation also requires prior to the establish. that site plans be sub- ment of the use. mitted for all uses sub- jected to a special land use permit procedure. Intensity Approach (Differentiate between Hi and Low Intensity Uses) Pros Cons —Can be tailored to —Most likely would re- match a community's quire use of professional needs. For example, low staff or a consultant. intensity uses could be permitted by right whereas high intensity uses could be subjected to a permit procedure. Similarly, differentiations could be made between urban residential and rural residential uses.. —Modern performance - oriented approach which is gaining acceptability, Prohibition of home occupations Pros Cons —in some high density —Might tend to force districts it may be home occupations "un- desirable and defensible derground" resulting in a to prohibit all, or nearly number of problems all, home occupations, which could include ex- -Certain high intensity, pensive litigation. potentially volatile, noisy —It could be argued that or large home occupa. homeowners have consti- tions may best be pro- tutional rights to operate hibited from any residen- limited business activities tial district. in their homes. (see con. stitutional issues section). --Unidentified home oc. cupations could "escape" personal property taxes. —Michigan's zoning en. abling acts provide that a zoning ordinance shall not totally prohibit the establishment of a land use in the presence of a demonstrated need for the use unless there is no location within the community where the use may be appropriately located, or the use is unlawful. RECOMMENDATIONS — In order to allow the zoning administrator to make in. formed decisions regarding the regulation of a pro- spective home occupation, a standardized informa- tional sheet should be provided to the prospective operator requesting a written description of the pro- posed business activities, and statements pertaining to employees, traffic, floor coverage, use of accessory buildings and commercial vehicles, structural altera- lions, equipment used, signs, etc. Provide a space on the form for the applicant to sign attesting to the fact that his/her statements are true and that he/she understands the responsibilities involved, — Communities should exercise caution when con- sidering annual monitoring of permits for home oc- cupations. Urbanizing areas can be inundated with a significant number of home occupations over a period of several years which could create the need for a full-time inspectorladministrator. — Stipulate that the owner of a home occupation reside within the same dwelling unit in which the activity is conducted, Businessmen occasionally purchase du- plexes with the intention of living in one unit and operating a business in the other unit under the guise of a home occupation. — Specify that no more than one home occupation per dwelling unit/property is permitted, -- Recognize temporary home businesses in the or. dinance. Some ordinances attempt to regulate garage sales via the issuance of a no -fee permit from the municipality and include standards such as limiting the length of sale to three days at a time and no more than three times a year. There are a myriad of seasonal businesses that are popular at resider. fiat locations including the following: firewood sales, christmas tree sales, costume rentals (Halloween and Christmas), deer processing, income tax preparation, bait shops and vegetable stands. — It could be argued that providing for mixed use districts such as the old concept of a shopkeeper running his/her business downstairs and living upstairs would diminish the demand for home oc- cupations. -- Be cautious of implementing a spacing requirement between home occupations.. The majority of home occupations are inconspicuous. How do you justify a specific spacing distance? It is very possible that if a spacing requirement is in effect, there could be "unauthorized" home occupations located within the minimum distance. — Limit home occupations to residential districts not to residential dwellings. Residential dwellings often ex- ist as nom conforming uses in non-residential districts, therefore the community's intent s"old be discontinuance of the use rather than permitting a home occupation which would tend to prolong the situation. — It the community includes a clause in their regula. tions reserving the right to terminate home occupa- tions which violate the terms of the ordinances or of its permit, a uniform procedure should be establish- ed in order to avoid charges that decision makers are taking a capricious and arbitrary action. Pro- LULU PROCEEDINGS AVAILABLE Persons not attending the recent conference on locally unwanted land uses (LULU'S) described in the June issue of Planning & Zoning News can obtain a copy of the proceedings from: Continuing Education Division Oakland University Rochester, MI 48063 (313) 377-3120 HIGH TECH BANISHED The tenth annual national Unicorn Hunters Banishment Award for wordslphrases that mis or over -use the english language has gone this year to "high tech" and "build -down". These two words were nominated by more Unicorn Hunters than any others and the count was so close it was called a tiein describing the rationale for nominating "high tech" for total banishment from use, a Unicorn Hunter writes: HIGH TECH. Used by politicians, adver- tisers, and educators to signify nothing ex� cept a vague jumble of concepts which they favor, Its most important contribution to the world of jargon is its potential for gram. matical formulations, Does one use high tech like a wrench? Or operate it like a bulldozer? Practice it like a religion? Was high tech invented, developed, discovered or manufactured? "Build down" on the other hand, was banish. ed because it is "unwholesome terminology for an etymological impossibility describing a political improbability." Huh? July±ugu St lube F;re>sivell more stringent measures should be stint, _- tared such as: ])Written warning; 2)Second --i noting possibility o1 termination, and 3) Public hear ing prior to termination. -- Do not add stipulations to a home occupation ap provai in order to appease "howling" neighbor s 4 the stipulations cannot be easily monitored and aro- forced. Examples of such stipulations include sped, fling hours of operation, specifying the maxrmlJm number of people in the dwelling, etc. — Communities may want to consider the Davis, California Zoning Ordinance which contains special provisions providing physically handicapped in- dividuals a special review by the planning commis sion when a home occupation is being considered The ordinance permits the applicant to request a waiver from the home occupation standards which shall be reviewed at a public hearing with Ker,,[ consideration to the applicant's physical in3b➢tt3 lu comply with the. s'tandar'd home occupation reipda tions. However, while the public purpose of such a provision is clear, in the absence of specific enabimg authority, such an action could result in unequal zoning treatment of similarly situated properties — Do not overlook the importance of the intent)pur pose section of home occupation regulation<, Stipulate that home occupations shall be accessory to the principal use (residential) of the propos 1, Consider inserting a clause stating that home ar. cupations should be operated such that the nci131 bors, under normal circumstances, would not Irr^ aware of their existence, Mark Graham Planning Directs, Delta Township, Eaton Cnui,l; RECOMMENDED READING Planning lot Home Occupations, William To - American Society of Planning Officials, Planning Ail visory Service, Report No, 31.6. April 1976. 21 pP "Performance Standards for Horne Occopa11(_', " Frederick H- Allen III, American Planning Associa Env,. PAS Memo, January 1984, 4 pp, "Zoning for Home Occupations", Thomas Smith, Zoning News, American Planning Association, March, 19%14, pg 3. "Home Occupation Ordinance", Morton, Illinois. 120 Main Street, P.0. Box 28, Morton, Illinois. 61550. ho, 1984, 9 pp, Fool NOTES "AI Name .d, 9atte¢Y'. 1 ". Plural,. Ou,l MaretlA. rastrwell al— ins 1982. Dl 0051 Th. O."aMd EaaY Cr 0rtre0e 0 OrAfth— Byre, S MoslawN ,ant Csl G W. - real" lu 0"'. 10, Nese 0 HuMrn tlmveni 1. o 10, 1981 'Alin TolNer. No'. shxl. Random Nouse WE, 505 antes Wail a wha,e Noma li Mall N'uon, 1111 541, leumal, cannel News S,�v,r� January 9, 1983, pas. 7A and 9A. ' "No Workplace like Home', Well Street Journal. Editorial 4l,, February 23. 1984. Ibid, ' Uma, r 91wn1lad Th, 196 Nitro App 809, 308 NW2d ml 11980 ' leMarn r ehntedidd rep., 409 A10 941 798 Nwtd 119801 Hardin Iamd bu hen ,, boor, 133 M,th Apo 322 119821 COURT OF APPEALS (Continued from page 1). The Court of Appeals determined that the Marketable Record Title Act did not extinguish prescriptive ease. ments acquired by hostile possession. The require Tents for a prescriptive easement; open, nol. continuous, and adverse use across the land of another for 15 years were found to have been met in this casr, Consumer's used the dam from 1927 to 1970 floodlit; the properties of the plaintiffs, The Court noted "Whus, i7 a claimant has obtained a conveyance of an easement which is ineffective, his use of M, subservient estate, made on the assumption that lho conveyance was legally effective, was adverse ,and not made in subordination to the owner of the burdened estate," Cook, supra, slip op, at 3, quotimg 3 Powell on Real Property §413 pp. 34109, 110 Ihr Court concluded that even if the express easements were extinguished by the Marketable Title Act, Grand River Hydro still held prescriptive easements establish ed by Consumer's Power over the property, The Court also rejected property owners equitable estoppel argument, noting that Consumers was under no duty to update county easement records, nor to ir, form the owners that they may someday exercise Iter, easement. Further, no evidence presented indicated Consumers made any representation it would not operate the dam. Thus, Grand River Hydro was nol estopped from using the dam, Finally, the Court dismissed the property ownersdams based upon the MEPA. The Court of Appeals ag,ced with the trial court's finding that no evidence was presented showing unique plant life would bo de stroyed nor that displaced animals would be dep,'ws:rl of a suitable living environment by the operation of if, dam. The Court concluded, "(wild find that the deh=n cant's operation of the dam does not rise to leve) or impairmeof or destruction of natural resources so baa to constitute an environmental risk and ju,sbiv judicial intervention." Cook, supra, slip op, at 5 Court Summaries hy'. .L Michael Banes, P C P Community Planner Senior, Detroit College of Law Royal Oak Village ctivIount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager FROM: Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services DATE: August 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Camp Mc Donald Road - Mandel to River Rd. Jurisdictional Transfer Per your note on my July 6, 1990 memo concerning the County's proposed improvement and jurisdictional transfer of Camp McDonald Road, I will contact the County to have them revise the agreement to include a three (3) lane section with curb and 'gutter and an enclosed storm sewer system and the use of concrete pavement. However I suggest we might want to have our informational public meeting with the residents prior to contacting the County to determine what type of improvements the residents would like or if they want any improvements at all. If the residents are firmly against any improvement and the Village Board sides with them, or decides they will not accept a jurisdictional transfer, then there is no sense asking the County to change the agreement. when we hold the public information meeting, would you want to consider holding it in the neighborhood -- possibly at the District 26 school or River Trails Park District facility which are both on Burning Bush Road, between Euclid and Camp McDonald - or at one of the Village offices. There are about 88 lots which face onto Camp McDonald Road and we might also get some attendees from the surrounding neighborhoods. Please notify me if you want me to contact the School District or Park District for use of their facilities and what time and date would be best for a meeting. Do you want to invite the Mayor and Board to attend this type of meeting? Chuck Bencic CB/bv Mount PINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM rospect Public Works Department nm cm m TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: July 6, 1990 SUBJ: Jurisdictional Transfer Camp McDonald Rd. I recently received a proposed agreement for the maintenance and jurisdictional transfer of Camp McDonald Road between River Rd. and Mandell. On May 31, 1990, 1 sent you a memo relative to a meeting that I attended in Prospect Heights with their city Manager, representative of the Cook County Highway Department and engineering representatives from Prospect Heights, Arlington and Wheeling. , In this memorandum there were some items that I felt should be addressed prior to signing an agreement. Under Item I, Page 2 of the proposed agreement it states in part that "there shall be a two lane cross section from Dale Ave. to Des Plaines/River Road". The Village engineer and I feel that there should be a third lane for the entire distance to be used as a left turn lane for our residents fronting on Camp McDonald Road. Further it was discussed that the Village may want to consider a concrete street versus gravel base and bituminous surface. It is also my understanding that residents in Mount Prospect adja- cent to Camp McDonald Road have previously voiced opposition to this planned improvement and it may be prudent to schedule a public discussion with those residents. Further, the agreement stipulates that the City of Prospect Heights would take over maintenance of the full width of the roadway between Rt. 83 and Dale Ave. Currently our corporate limits are the center line of Camp McDonald Rd. This action could affect the condo owners in the Colony Country multifamily housing area. While in my opinion it would be beneficial to have this roadway improved and an enclosed storm sewer installed I would recommend that the resolution state in part that "the Village of Mount Prospect must approve the preliminary and final plan based on local conditions prior to said implementation and transfer of jurisdiction". INJW�Z'V_"�Z 1,11IL1,41-1 Herbert L. Weeks HLW/eh CC: Village Engineer Bencic CPMCTRAN.SER Village of Mount Prospect�N Mount Prospect, Illinois L INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM IV TO: HERB WEEKS, DIRECTOR -OF PUBLIC WORKS. CHUCK BENCIC, DIRECTOR OF INSPECTION SERVICES FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK RE: JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER, CAMP MAC DONALD ROAD DATE: JULY 5, 1990 Attached is a copy of the proposed agreement to assume the maintenance and jurisdiction of Camp Mac Donald Road between River Road and Mandell. This is a multi -municipal jurisdictional transfer involving Arlington Heights, Prospect Heights, Wheeling and Mount Prospect. If everything meets with your approval, this matter will be placed on the Village Board agenda for the July 17th meeting. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk caf/ Att. cc: John Burg, Assistant Village Manager ILLINOIS LEPAKMERr (Conveyer) (Facipients) CIF TRV4SPORTAnON MY OF PFC6PECT HeIGMS 10M AGENCY AGRM4M 7M COWN OF COOK vnIA(XOF KUNZ% JURISDIMONAL TRANSFER HEIGMS VIUAGE OF MaW PFOSPECr (The Villagef is also a party to this agreement, for assent to a transfer.) of 0 I AOOOR��XMJU� N ODF-DANCE AEAMRITY granted ih Section 4-409 of the Illinois Hi9tamy Oade, this agreement is made and entered Into between the &bow local agencies to transfer the jurisdiction of O.W M=OKALD R.VD, Cbkmty Hi j�' 'U A58, Rand Fbad to Des Plaines River Road, 3.30—miles injength overall, as follows: Rand Road to Dale Avenue, 0.15 mile, to Village of Arlington Heights Dsle Avenue to M*A--1 law, 2.40 mile, to City of Prospect daights Mandel to DesPlaines Piver Toad 0.75 mile, to Village of Motmt Prospect 16Fal mv—m' 3. 10 mile NOW Executed by the *parties an the dates of adopted ordinances and resolutions attached: THE COUNTY OF COOK, Conveyor Village of Wheeling By Village President Agreement Approved by City of Prospect Heigh en Illinois D--partmnt of Transportation By Mayor Village of Mount Pro TRecipi By Mayor Ire 'cts� r orTj .1 1 Tways Village of Arlington jij,74—htsRC--"TjT,—e--t Date - By Village President Efl`ect'Nie date of ADDENDUM #1 STIPULATICM •r rt- • an agreement beteen The 000unty of Cbok, the Village of Wmaeling, the City of Proqxrt Heights, the village of Arlington Heights and the Village of M3Unt Prospect, for improving Cwp McDonald Road between Rand and Des PIAJ River AuNdS and Vubsaq,.Mtly transferring jurisdiction and maintenance from the County to the aforesaid municipalities 1- Tne improvement, by the 0ounty at County oost(except for new sidew&Lks Wwor street lighting),shall consist of a four lane cross section from R%nd kad to We Avenue, two lane cross section from Dale Avenue to Des Plaines River Aoad; intersection channelization as determined from design study, and reoonstruction Of the drainage structure at McDonald Crack, No. 3092, presently a 0ountv win: a. Upon x;oeipt of approval � of final plans from m•xmt prospect, Arlington Heights, Prospect Heights, and Weeling, based on previously approved preliminary Plans, advertise,award, construct, and supervise •• a• PaY for the cost of •w exoepting new sidewalk (not replacement sidewalk) and street lighting; b. Coordinate all matters requiring same with the municipalities through all design and oonstruotion phases, invite tk*m to bring any matterssof concem. to the County resident's attention, and to participate in final inq*ctioq,. c -Acquire any right of way, includin4'ea`sementi, for 'the inproveolent! d. Transfer jurisdiction of Canp McDonald FcM to M=zt Prospect, Arlington Heights and Prospect Heightsf the latter subject to approval of the Village of Mvueling over part of same), subsequent to acceptance of each municipality of that part of the improvement as listed on the previous page hereto, and transfer maintenanoe of said road* to -each municipality accepting jurisdiction within the jurisdictional limits. 3. The Villages of M-ieelinq, Arlinqton Heights, Mount Prospect and the City of Prospect Heights will each a. Promptly review plans subndtted*by the County and comment on same so as to avoid unxxxvssary delay, b. With respect to the corporate Limits of eacl, mnicipality, pay for tl)e construction, installation and operating costs of any new sidewalk and/or street lighting desixedby that municioalitv to be included in the project; Payments are to •TM m3de by check payable tothe Treasurer for cook county for deposit in the county's Motor Ful -I Tax F�und Account 600-570, and sent to the Superintendent of Highways; payments are to be made within thirty days of date Of a statem--nt fran the County to Ue municipalities involved af ter acceptance of t1v sidewalk' and/or lighting from final inspection. 4. Rhe City of Proqwat Heights will a. Paw the Or�cs, A&Iendum #3 -PH bereto, declaring intent. to aoompt jurisdiction am CmV MWonald RMd f= Dale Aveaus to the west right of way line of Mwx*l -tane follasifig aocq,>twm from inspection of the ompleted iMMwsmentQxmtyfincluding Structure #3092); said ordinance to be passed with executing this agreement; b. Accept the jurisdiction at the future date indicated in item 4a; c. Assume •^ of rr. • MaDonald ••_• from Rind ••.• to the west right i •way lineof • Won written• •" from county to do so following aooeptanoe by Proq3ect Heights and the 0=Tty from inspection of the ccapleted Improvement, including Structure #3092; d. Paoognize the term of any existing intergovernmental agreements penoerz?lr4 the exercise of the aforesaid jurisdiction and maintenance over_* 1) the south half of Camp McDonald Road between Dale Avenue and Elmhurst Road which lies within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect, 2) the north half of Camp McDonald Road from McDonald Creek to Wolf load which lies within the oorporate limits of the Village of Wheeling 3) Camp McDonald toad bei Rand Road arra Dale Avenue, which Lies witlin the corporate limits of the Village of Arlington Heights and will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Village of Arlington Heights. S. The Village of Arlington heights will a. At the time it executes this agreement, pass the ordinance, •,« declaring intent to accept jurisdiction of Canp McDonald pcad from Rand FcM to Dale Avenue upon acceptance of the ampleted improvement from inspection with the Countyisaid limits being the corporate limits of Arlington ; •. Assume jurisdiction ofCaupMcDonald • o •uponacceptance • rn said inspection, consenttomaimtenanceof CampMcDonald •.o •from Randpoad to Dale Avenue by the City of Prospect Heights as in item 4c above, such consent conveyed by ; •aHeights'#, of 6. The Village of Mount Prospect will a. At the time it executes this agreement, pass the Ordinance, Addendum 0-W, declaring intent to assume4 • .• maintenance of p McDonald Foad from the west right of way line of Mandel Lane to Des Plaines River Road following acceptance from final inspection with the County; b. Assume jurisdiction of Camp McDonald Road from the west line of Mandel lam immeidiately following said final inspection acceptance; c. Assume maintenace of said length of Camp McDonald Road upon written notice to •• so from the County• • • acceptance from ••- •. * executing agreement,•• • • .* • juris- dictional assumption of Camp MrDonald R:�ad, south half, from Dale Avenue to Ehnhurst R•-• by of Prospect H- •1 ADDENUR #1 STIPUIATICNti. Page 3 7. The Village of Wheeling, by W=uting this agreertmt, will thus consent to maintenance and assumption of jurisdiction of Camp McDonald Riad, north half, from McDonald Creek to Wblf'R:)adby the City of Prospect Heights, the latter in the course of obligations to be assumed by it herein. The Village shall attach authorizing minutes for execution. 8. This agreanent shall be processed in six original copies, one being for the Illinois Department of Transportation. When effective, it shall bind the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. ELK GROVE TWP., PAGE 19 MAINE TWP., PAGE 20 12 Part of AI MMNG TOWNSHIP W, O Paialme 9 Rd 4-1 Camp Mc(onajd Rd Kensington Rd ci Adderidun #2 CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHIS MNICIPAL OFODWKE No. Concerning the addition of Camp McDonald Road between the limits of Dale Avenue to west right of way line of Mandel Lane to the municipal street system at a future date: Wl*zeas,the Ci*,y of Prospect Heights and The County of Cook,are entering into agreement for the improvement by the County and transfer of lurisdiction Of Camp McDonald FOad from Dale Avenue to west right of way, Mandel Lane to the municipa.1 street system of this mnucipality; Now Thereforepbe it ordaine<f that at such time as the City of Prospect Heights and Zie, County of Cook acoept, from Joint inspectiono certain impmmrents to the said',parf. of,lczxrp McDonald Fbad, 'with due written xecord having been made Of said Aoc�ptance,and forwarded to the Illinois 'Dei f Trans?ortatio that CzM McDonald Ybad from Dale Avenue to the west r 10 e I c ig t of w8 Maz id lane, shall then.and thexeafter be a m cipal street of this mmici, lity, cane Jni loa and deleted`f ' tm�, the County -Highway System. The Cleark'Of this myniciPalitY is directed to see that a certified oopy of this Ordjmwxe is attached as Addendum #3 -PH -to the agreement being entered into with The, �bunty Of Cook (six copies of said agreement) and to forward all six coptes for execution to the =nicipality indicated in the letter of transmittal from the County concern" this'agreement; further, to file an additional certified copy witifti-A6,111inois Department of Transportation for informational purposes. Certification City Clerk in and for the citV of Prospect Heights, a m-micipal corporation of the state of Illinois and keeper of the records and files of said mzdcipality as provided by Statute, do hereby certify the fore- 90ing to be a true, -Perfect and amplete copy of an Ordinance passed by the City COUnciL City Of Prospect Heights' at itc me•held an 19 In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affi-x9d. the saal of this m1nicipality at my office on the above date. SEAL City Clerk ADDENDUM #3-FPH VILLAGE OF MOUNT Pmspwr MUNICIPAr ORDINANCE No. Concerning the addition of Cap McDonald Road between the limits of the west ri ht of-yway line of Mandel Lane and Des Plaines River Road to the muni 1pal street system at a future date: Whereas, the VJllage of Mount Prospect and The County of Cook are entering into agreeient for the imprOvenent by U* County and transfer of jurisdiction Of CxT McDonald Pbad from west right of Way, Mandel Lane to DesPlaines River Road to the municipal street system of this municipality, Ncw Therefore,, be it ordained*that at such time as the Village of mcxmt Prospect and 7' heCounty of Cook &=Vt, from joint inspection, certain impromTents to the having been Made of t of Transportation, that SWI to DesPlaines River Road and del municipality, The Clerkof this municipality is directed to see that a certified copy of t1us Ordinance is attached as Addendum #3 -MP -to the agreement being entered into with The_itbunty af Cook (six copies of said agreement) and to forward all six copies tor 6xec��n to the mmicipality indicated in the letter of transmittal from the County concerning this*agreement; further, to file an additional certified copnois Department of Transportation for informational purposes. Cer�if'ication Village Clerk in and for the Village of Mount Prospect, a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois and keeper of the records and files of said municipality as provided by Statute, do hereby certify the fore� going to be a true, -perfect- and amplete copy of an Ordinance passed by the Village Board of the Village of f -bunt Prospect at its neeting held on 19 In testJumny whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the saal of this municipality at my office on the above date. SEAL Village Clerk ADDENDUM #3- Np I I 'it I - a 0 Omxxraing the addition of Camp !McDonald Fcad between the Limits of . Rand ROM to Dale Avenue to the municipal street system at a future date: Whereas, Village of Arlington Heights' jnd The County of Cook are entering ,Into agreement foo• w by the County and transfer of jurisdiction of Camp �L-Donald Road from Rand Foad to Dale Avenue to the nwdcipal street system of this municipality; Now Therefore,,be it ordained that at such time as the Village and T' ue- County of Cook accept, from joint inspection, certain IvMweTents to the hwAng been made of t of Transportation that sha�ll murlicipality, and r -l The Clerkof tbis municipality is directed to see that a certified copy of this Ordinance is attached as Addendum #3 -AH to the agreement being entered into with The County of Cook (six copies of said agrement) and to forward all Six OOP'es for execution to the =niciPalitY indicated in the letter Of transmittal from the County !• •` this'agreenient, further, to file an additional certified copy with7 the'lilimis Deparbnent of Transportation for informational purposes. Certification Village clerk in and for the Village of Arlingtcn Heights a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois and keeper of the records and files of said municipality as provided by statute, do hereby certify the fore_ going to be a truce, -perfect and complete copy of an Ordinance passed by the Village Board of. the village of Arlington Heights atat its meeting held cn lg—. In testirrany whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of this municipality at my office on the above date. SEAL village Clerk C1.YrtI1CATt Nt %X9rrx Of Rr.C4wn3 Alto fI "—P.0 Pwi s+.. I, Stanley T. Kuaper, Jr., County Clerk of Cook County, in the State aforesaid and keeper of the recuras and h1es of said Cook County, do hereby certify that The Board of Commissioners of The County of Cook at their regular meeting held on the date indicated below, Passed the following resolution: l��s�I,uxlorl Resolved by the Board of Commissioners of Cook County, Illinois, on behalf of The County of cook, that Camp McDonald Road from Rand Road to Des Plaines River Road is to cease as a county Highway and became a municipal street uTIder the separhte"and distinct jurisdictions of the Villager of Arlington Heights, the Village of Mount Prospect and the City of Prospect Heights, as described in the attached agreement to which this Resolution is marked Addendiun #4, and that the mLnucipalities-are to accept maintenance thereover as shown in said agreenent, all subsequent to an improvement by the County Department of Highways and acceptance by the said nuucipalities frau inspection of the oompleted project, all subject to approval of the Illinois Departnent of Trans- portation of this agreement and notification of said Department of Transportation of said acceptances fran final inspection; all of which appears from the records 'and files of my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of said County at my office In the City of Chicago in said County, this day of A D. 19 C40W CIVIL RESOLUTION NUMBER P5P-/7(� RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE PRESIDENT TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH COOK COUNTY FOR THE JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER AND MAINTENANCE OF A PORTION OF CAMP MCDONALO ROAD WHEREAS, The Cook County Highway Department has proposed to undertake certain improvements to Camp McDonald Road; and WHEREAS, following completion of said improvements, Camp McDonald Road will cease to be a County Highway and become a Municipal Street under separate and dis- tinct municipal jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, a portion of the northern one-half of Camp McDonald Road lying wester- ly of Wolf Road is currently located within the Village of Wheeiing's corporate limits and is inc luded in the proposed Roadway Improvements; and WHEREAS, it is deemed not to be in the best interest of the Village of Wheeling to accept jurisdictional maintenance responsibilities for the northern half of a segment of Camp McDonald Road; and WHEREAS, The City of Prospect Heights, Illinois is desirous of accepting the jurisdictional transfer of that portion of Camp McDonald Road, currently located within the Village of Wheeling, in order to resolve future maintenance problems associated with split roadway jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, Cook County has prepared a Jurisdictional Transfer agreement whereby the Village of Wheeling will consent to the maintenance and assumption of jurisdic- tion of the northern one-half of Camp McDonald Road, from Wolf Road to Camp McDonald Creek by the City of Prospect Heights. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF WHEELING, COUNTIES OF COOK AND LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, that the Viliage President is authorized to execute the agreement for assent to transfer, as prepared by the County of Cook, as attached hereto and made part of this resolution. Trustee moved, seconded by Trustee a/Z.e dS G'AT� that Resolution Number ��^ //�� be adopted. Trustee Abruscato Trustee Altieri ! T Sr Trustee Hartman Trustee Ratajczak Z&d Trustee Rogers ?Y4 Trustee Whittington z�Z4 ADOPTED this G 4 day of_ , 1989, by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Wheeling, Illinois. Sheila H. Schultz, Village President Village of Wheeling ATTEST: _ Lois J. Gaffka, Village Clerk 4 RESOLUTION R-90-59 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A CAMP MC DONALD LOCAL AGENCY JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the County of Cook has approached the City of Prospect Heights offering the improvement and transfer of jurisdiction of Camp McDonald Road to the City; and WHEREAS, the City, along with the Villages of Mount Prospect, Wheeling and Arlington Heights, are evaluating the benefits of said transfer; and WHEREAS, the Agreement stipulates that the four communities must approve the preliminary and final plans based on local conditions prior to said improvement and transfer jurisdiction. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the City Council of the City of Prospect Heights, Cook County, Illinois as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the facts setforth in the preamble hereto are true and correct and hereby adopts the same as part of this resolution. Section 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign and execute the County of Cook Local Agency Jurisdictional Transfer Agreement for Camp McDonald Road attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 3. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED this 2nd day of July 1990 APPROVED this 3rd day of July 1990 ACTING/KYOJ( ATTEST: K-111,11 \,CITY CLERK AYES: Chickerneo, Jung, Merle, Richartz, Shipanik and Sunde NAYS: None ABSENT: Lutzow, Rotchford TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mount--efres'ect Public Works 1.- partm+ent 7 A INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Village Manager Director Public Works May 31, 1990 Camp McDonald Road c: Chuck Bencic UAL U T A Chuck Bencic and I attended a meeting with Bob Kiely of Prospect Heights, Bob Hedrick of the Cook County Highway Department, and the engineering representatives from Prospect Heights, Arlington Heights and Wheeling. The purpose of this discussion was to review, with the Cook County Highway Department, the possibility of their improving Camp McDonald.Road, from Rand Road to River Road. This issue has been informally discussed for nearly a year, and it appears that the County may be anxious to make the necessary improvements and relinquish its responsibilities by jurisdiction- al transfer to all the communities involved. As you will note, by the attached map, the Village of Mount Prospect would only be agreeable for maintenance and jurisdictional transfer of that portion between Mandel Lane and River Road. Per previous discus- sions, the south one-half of Camp McDonald Road, by Old Orchard Country Club, would be improved; however, maintenance and juris- diction would be assumed by the City of Prospect Heights. The City of Prospect Heights is also willing to take over traffic control on that stretch of roadway. Cook County's basic plan calls for a two-lane cross section for the entire distance, with channelization at specific intersec- tions. The bridge at McDonald Creek would be designed for four lanes in case Prospect Heights would find it necessary to widen this roadway to that width. There is also the possibility of four lanes at the Soo Line railroad crossing near Camp McDonald and Wolf. The Cook County Highway Department would not approve installation of new sidewalks, but could consider planting of some trees along the right-of-way. The Village of Arlington Heights requested a four -lane cross section on that stretch of roadway between Dale and Rand, which the County will seriously consider. Bob Kiely from Prospect Heights will make contact with the school district regarding their preference for the roadway width at Schoenbeck and Camp McDonald. There also is a park involved, and it is possible that the City of Prospect Heights may want a four -lane cross section between Dale and Route 83 in Mount Prospect. Plans are currently in -6 progress for channelization and signalization of the intersec- tion of Wheeling Road and Camp McDonald Road and for River Road and Camp McDonald Road. The County does not believe there will be any right-of-way problem on any length of the roadway. The County is willing to put in storm sewers and curb and gutter, but they would not be agreeable to improve the road and then contract with the communities for the maintenance thereof. Any improvements would have to be with the jurisdictional transfer. Bob Kiely will be receiving traffic counts from the County on Camp McDonald Road, and he'll forward these to us. It is Mr. Kiely's intent to bring this before the Prospect Heights City Council meeting on June 18, 1990. If they approve it, then the agreement would be sent to either Mount Prospect or Arlington Heights for approval of their portions of the roadway. Some items that I feel should be addressed are as follows: A. Between Mandel and River Road, there are many driveway entrances to single-family homes. We are concerned about the potential for accidents if there were no left -turn lane for residents trying to enter or exit their properties. As such, it is our recommendation to make a request to the County for a three -lane roadway between Mandel and River Road and that the third (or center) lane be a turning lane only, with no raised median - only painted lines. B. In keeping with past discussions with the Board, we may want to request that the County make this a concrete street versus a gravel base with a bituminous surface. C. I would suggest that a public discussion be scheduled for the proposed improvements with all residents in Mount Pros- pect whose properties abut Camp McDonald Road. We have received telephone calls from some residents east of Mandel Lane who are not in favor of any type of improvement, as they are concerned about an increase in traffic. Also, on the Colony Country planned unit development, it may be wise to contact their homeowners association for their input before any final agreement is reached. Mr. Hedrick of the Cook County Highway Department believes pre- liminary design, including survey work, has started, even though the communities have not approved the cross section. He feels that, realistically, the plans could be completed after our review, and storm sewer installation could begin as early as fall of 1991, with the remainder of roadway work being done in 1992. HLW/td attach. bc: Superintendents ,I'*t0, 111 ti. October 10, 1989 Villaae of 255 West Dundee p4ad POBOxV Wheeling, Illinois 60090 Attn Village t ArlingtonviLi,age of Arlington Heigd� . -„ . Arlington Heights.,.w00 Attn • - • J Village of Mxmt Prospect 100 South & erson street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Attn Mayor City of Prospect Heights 4 Fast Cam MCDXA ,d Foad Prospect Heights, Illinois 60070 Attn Mayor Re Carp McDonald Asad Rand Fbad-DeSPlaines River Road Inprovement, Transfer of Jurisdiction and Maintenance to Three Municipalities Agreement Enclosed for execution and information are copies of the captioned agreement as foilows: Six7 copies to Wheeling for execution, one copy to each of the other three =nicipalities foradvance information. The substance of agreement is set forth in the first page and Addendum, #l, having been ly discussed • .• ,,...."`•!.'. .';:.♦ about •' ♦ County Mjmunicipalities.- W�eeling is asked to owcute first, because of Its 1IMited and forward ••. to 11. of Prospect Heights.Y Mo .. ty is to Should Process and send the six to Arlington Heights, wtlich, after processing the six, • •return thmto the 03)' Eq)editicus handling is re=mw1ded SO that the County can begin the work at #n early date. The OxmtY will e>wcute and send all six to the Illinois Department of Transportation for approval signatures on each. imr is awced to return One origixial d=xent to the four nzacipalities and to the Clounty, retaining one for record. Ve y s, t. enn. eri Superintendent of Highways Cook County, Illinois Copy_ IDOT Schaumburg, Attn Omar Nashif ww • 1* • w 1` • Oki ;j Me •je•i•wrr•n• is • party to agreement • assent • transfer.) +1IN•`i • granted • 4-409 of •is HighAmy •• • . , this agremmt is madee s entered into bebeen the . • • local agencies to transfer the jurisdictionof •A * m=cwn FnAD, county • ASS, Rand *•b ♦ to Des Plaines • '•. • •• �. 1 •• • • • • • '• ••.• 1 • • • • • ••: • • • '• • • Mw. ^ .AIM.. • /lY • :.w • •• S.alb• • • •! • • - II iAlk• �.•,, • •u .•• : , • p • S`.IM Alk •.', • ". • • •• • . e •AAA •. • �—•_ • — • •• • • r •" • • • Mk Ilk • • • - y ties on the dates of 'ry OF COOK, Conveyor 7vi,r " r It tgvroved by I11"O,is i, art'nt of Translx)rtation Mi. 7j c G)- c;f-T71,T1 _-- Ua � Effective date of agreewnt adopted ordinances and resolutions attached: Village of t•b(x--ling By Village President City of I-"rospect heights , Recipient By Mayor Village of Mout I,rosix•ct, Reci }dent By 1`.-I" or Village of A'u-)itrtt�n Ikr1( liLti •nt By Village • r • N rv• • . Cbnoerninq an &Mwmtbeteen The OCKInty of Mok, the Village of %bftling,, ProspectCity Of *.Village COMount Prospect, for improving Cwp ft.-UxuM R3ad bebmen pand and Des Plaines to the aforesaid nzxicipalities i 1. The improvemnt, by the (bu street ligfiting),shall oons [dale Avenue, two lane cross intersection lization of the drairswo structure a, bridges 2. The O=tv will: ity at County cost (except for new sidewalksand/or .st of a four lane cross section fron Find Fined to section frau We Avenue to Des Plaines River Road; as determined from design study,, and re=nstruction ana W Creek, No. 3092, presently • a. receipt Of *PrMaJL -Of firall Plana from M:Mt Pxoqxct,, Arlington Heights, • advertise, . v ... * constructand s4pervise.. •. Pay for the cost of the inrvmmvmt exopptiM new sideALlk (not repIAceaent sid'.w andstreet•i. • design and oxtstruction phLses, invite them to bring any matterssof concero, to County resident'sattention,and to participate fijW ""* +. C.Aciquire any rightofway, including*ea��ts,• Heights and Prospect Heightst the latter subject to aRproval of the Village of » • over part ofsubsequent to acceptance +. each =nicipadity Of that part of the iaprovewtnt as listed on the previous page hereto, and transfer maintenance of said road* to -each mznicipatlity acioepting jurisdiction within the j ,• -iona limits. 3. The Villages of W-ieelinq, Arlington Heights, Mount Prospect and the City of Prospect Heights will each a. * the County and ccrmvent- so as to avoid =xxxmsaxy delay, b. With respect to the corporate limits of eadi rv.ucipality, pay for tI)e construction, installation and operating costs of arry new sidewalk and/or street lighting desired -by that mviicioautv to be included in the project; PayrWnts are to be ma&- * d -0-A PaYable to the Treasurer for Cook County for depos't in the Count'Y's MOtcr Fuel Tax Rrd Account 600-570, and sent to the '* ` • Of *h »•.. • • r ••m«. . ea.. . tw:.. • • w• • e 1 •:s. �•w•..:.a. .-. .. 1) the south half of Camp McDonald Road between, Dale Avenue and FIRtnsst Road which lies within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect, 2) the north half of Carp McDonald road frau NWX,9L1d Creek to Waif Read which lies within the corporate limits of the Village of Wheeling 3) Camp McDonald Road between Fund Riad and Dale Avenue, which lies within the corporate limits of the Village of Arlington Heights and will be subject to the j of the Village of Arlington Heights. S. The Viii of Arlington heights will a. At the time it ex0CUtes this agreeltent, pass the Ordinance, Addend= #3 -AH, declaring =tent to accept jurisJiction of Cmr McDonald Rvd from Pand • • • .o --ale Avmueupon acceptance r of coupleted inprcyemmt from inspection with the Countyisaid limits being the corporate ArlingtonHeights) .am fram said inspaction, c. Consent to maintenance of . McDonald ""•:. frcm Fond *.a • to Dale Avenue by of Prospect Hei•f .. a 4c aboverc consent conveyed by ArIkIgton Heights' exiecution of this agreement. 6. .The Village of Mount. Prospect will a. At the time it executes this agreement, pass the Crdinance, A dendxm 3 -ME?, declaring intent to asstm jurisdiction maintenance of Cwp McDonald Road from the west right of way line of Mandel Lam to Des Plaines River Road following acceptance from final inspection with the County; b. Assume jurisdiction of Carp McDonald Road from the west line of Mandel Lane iRa�iately following said final inspection acoeptarnoe; c. Assume maintenace of said length of Camp McDonald Road upon written notice to do so frun the County following acceptance from said final inspection, d. By executing this agreement, consent to the future maintenance and juris- dictirnal assumption of Carp McDonald Pcad, south half, frau Dale Avenue to Elmhurst Road, by the City of Prospect Heights. wryerzz ME_. - 7. 7he Village of W1061ings, by eaoeacting this bgvamt, will thus =rsmt to mmintownce and aswx%*J= of jurisdictim of CaW Rind, north half, frac Moonald Creek to Wolf, Rmd by the City of Prospect Heights, the latter in the ooisse of obligations to be asswed by it herein. The Village shall attach authorizing minutes for execution. 8. This agreement shall be processed in six original copies, one being for the Illinois iTMois rbrent of Transportation. When effective,- it- shall bind the parties hereto, their sucoessoars and assigns. la °� wryerzz ME_. - 7. 7he Village of W1061ings, by eaoeacting this bgvamt, will thus =rsmt to mmintownce and aswx%*J= of jurisdictim of CaW Rind, north half, frac Moonald Creek to Wolf, Rmd by the City of Prospect Heights, the latter in the ooisse of obligations to be asswed by it herein. The Village shall attach authorizing minutes for execution. 8. This agreement shall be processed in six original copies, one being for the Illinois iTMois rbrent of Transportation. When effective,- it- shall bind the parties hereto, their sucoessoars and assigns. ` 1 I►av wart/ Nd MCI IT r3 U. r .. Otis -Is so IT ..., ' (� Palalrne Rd Wheeling to consent to ti Maintenance and Jurisdiction of T. 42 • j ' north half by Prospect Heights o Ma ntenwn by Prospect Heights Idlo�a Rd Jurisdiction to Prospect Heigh, � ���,er�ance and Jurisdiction P D P� 11. �. to Mount Prospect J,a, wgwr w C;trno McDonald Rd C A M P M c D 0 NSA L D1 � .. R D ,—_,S—St.rU e #3092 Mount Prospect to Consent to " over d, Ir Maintenance and Jurisdiction of south half by Prospect Heights 125 +•'w r+ w� to � .� 1 ���� � �^�' *4"D;« a d .� ��� 1",a 1 i Jurisdiction to Arlington Heiglit s tww wawwa �.';a • ;� �r _, ; � ww, w, a � ..�.� * "� I ~y, ,w ,,",arc« ..�..""�,." �-�-•-� � . w�� � _ a Krntrngl n R 17 gg D�1y eyy � • � � : � " w� ""hy,.Win ,� �V �,_ _ ...iaaa .a � Via• � 4• y �. LI ,11 JOLy�JS��.11.�'C �" 35 .. . , 9 9 1 p 4 3 9 I „ a°__....�:`��. V ' 6 ay t* -"O 'vL�IHES / I � 1 ��� � ?" gggg'��yy.. �V��g�^ 1 � . q I n �` � i...t i.w.""�J�y�. r� q r�' # h q."wt" ta.",a !t^• ,ir... t:,.". a"^ ^ #,� d.„ �'s" � l as t «.. a„+�' s• ;,,.,, wwei�w �” 17 � „p, �W # "' �"w .--•--x.�e a p..:.".„ ��a""" .1 � li r� l�C «ems !"° jw`",Y^4:�"1"�fi ,� `a ���,^ (:r•rrlr.rl llrl 1 rt ELK GROvt: Twr., PAGE 19 - — MAINE iwP., PAGE 70 Part of I1iRELING �� TOWNSHIP Addendum #z 0 MJDTICIPAL ORDINANCE No. Concerning the addition of Carp McDonald Road between the limits of Rand Road to Dale Avenue to the municipal street system at a future date: whereas, village of Arlington Heights' EM The County of Cook -are entering into agreOmnt for .. by the County and transfer of jurisdicti Of • McDonald Road from Rand ••.• to Dale Avenue to the municipal street system of this municipality; I Now Therefore,. be it ordained that at such time as the Village and !nieCounty of Cook accept,, from )oint inspection, certain improvements to the said'paft'qf �,cwp McDonald road, with due written record having been that Camp McDonald, Boad from Rand R)ad to Dale Avenue shall then. + thereafter •:s•m'a municipal streetof • • *` • c e-ffigh4ay System. The Clerk'Of ttlisw •. directed to see that a certified copy of Ordinancethis • as Addendumthe agreement being entered into With The 6:�unty 6f Cook (six copies of said agreement) and to forward all sIx copies forar • the mmucipality• c• in the letter Of transnLttal fran the County conoerning this *agreement; further, to file an additional certified copy with7 the* 11iinois Department of Transportation for • • , • purposes. Certification Village Clerk in and for the Village of Arlington Heights a niL=clpal corporation of the State of Illinois and - keeper of the records and files of said munic'PalltY as provided by Statute, do hereby oertlfy the fore.A going to be a trUe, -Perfect and OmPlete copy of an Ordinance passed by the Village Board ofthe village of Arlington Heights at its mee held on testimony wlexeof I bave hereunto set MY hand and d the saal of this •. • .- . above a - SEAL Village Clerk . ADDENDUM # 3- Ali N CITY OF PROSPEC72 HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE No. dory >--n n the addition of Camp McDonald iniad between the limits of Dale Avenue to west right of way line of Mandel Lane to the minicipal street system at a future date: ��hereastthe City of Prospect Heightsand The Countyo entering 11 agreement for thaiMrovement by the County and transfer of • D w "" y. w . r. . r • to thentwdcipal street NOW Therefore,, -be it ordainedthat at such tire as the City of Prospect Heights and ZieCounty of, Cock accept, from joint inspection, - certain nts * . .. •.M.. D. Road,record ._b__ «► ., that Camp McDonald Road from Dale Avenue to the west right • ,� - r shall then -and thereafter become'a mmicipal street of this municipality, • • ` .. Lmty-Highway System. The Clerk -,of, tbi's mniciPalitY is directed to see that a certi f ied copy 0: this Ordinance is attached as Addendun #3 -PH -to the agreemnt being en into with The, County bf cookcopies of . agreement) and to7 0 . MM copiesa-11 six ! • M . b ..a • e. - - - Of tranSUattal from the County conceming this -agreement; further, to file for infonnationalpurposes. Certification I, City Clerk in and for the City of Prospect Heights, a-mLmicipal corporation of the State of Illinois and. keeper of the records and files of said nuinicipality as provided by Statrite, do hereby certify the fore- going to be a true, ,perfect and or�lete copy of an Ordinance Passed by the at its City C il, City of Prospect Heights held on , 19—. In testhac-ony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixad the seal of t1us manicipality at my office on the above date. City Clerk -ADDENDUM #3 -PH WNICIPAt, OR01MANCE No. Concerning the addition of Camp McDonald Road between the limits of the west right of. way line of Adel e and Des Plaines River Road , to the ci strdet systen at a future date: -mss, the Village of MbUnt Prospect and The County of Cook -are entering into agreement for the improvement by the County and transfer of jurisdiction Of CaMP McDonald from west right of way, Mandel Lane to DesPlaines River Road to the m.ar;d.ci.pal street system of this icipality; Now Therefore,, be it ordaine& that at such time as the village of 14xmt Prospect and ZieCounty of Cook accept, frW joint inspection certain improvements to the said*,Par*t *of -,Camp ft:D� Road, 'with due written xecord having been made 'Of said `66*6e"p'tanoe� . &)d' forwarded to the Illinois -Department of Transportation' that Camp McDonald,Poad fran west right of way, Mandel Lane to Desplaines River ' shall then. '1fthereafter'# w*.c minicipalstreetofthis municipality, The, Clerk -of, this mrdcipality,is directed to see that a certified copy of this Ordinance is attached as Addendum #3 ­MP -to the agreement being entered intowith The-�bunty• •b••(sixcopiesofsaid a• -eand to forward all six copiesfor • tothemmucipalityindicated in the letter of transmittal frm the County concenu-ng this agreement; further, to file an additional certified copy with"the'lllinois Department of T*ransportation for • •.. purposes. Certification I, I Village Clerk in and for the Village of Mount Prospect, a-ni- icipal corporation of the State of Illinois arra keeper of the records and files of said municipality as provided by Statute, do hereby certify the fore- going to be a true, -perfect- -and complete copy of an Ordinance passed by the Village Board of the Village of Mount Prospect at its meeting held cn 19 Inny f I have to set my Hand and affixed the seal of this ic. ity at my office on the above date. SEAL I Village Clerk ADDENDUM # 3- pgp CU7`WICATZ Al imq►.l;t'1lx or xrM14'1a3 ,AND f ILL—rwa 51w" 54,• ATE OF ILLINOIS, COtW of COOK1 I. Stanley T. Kusper, Jr., County Clerk of Cook County, in the State aforesaid and keeper of the rccuras and files of said Cook County, do hereby certify that The Board of Commissioners of The County of Cook at their regular meeting held on the date indicated below, passed the following resolution: RESQLUT10N Resolved by the Board of Commissioners of Cook County, Illinois, on behalf of The County of Cook, that Camp McDonald Road from Rand Road to Des Plaines River Road is to cease as a County Highway and became a municipal street Lroder the separAte- and distinct jurisdictions of the Village of Arlington Heights, the Village of Nbmmt Prospect and the City of Prospect Heights, as described in the attached agreement to which tills Resolution is marked Addendum #4, and that the municipalities are to accept maintenance thereover as shown in said agreement, all subsequent to -an i rovement by the County Department of Highways and acceptance by the said municipalities from inspection of the completed project, all subject to approval of the Illinois Department of Trans- portation of this agreement and notification of said Department of Transportation Of said acceptances frau final inspection; all of which appears from the records and files of my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of said County at my office in the City of Chicago in said County, this day of A D. 19 Addendum i4