HomeMy WebLinkAbout0229_001H
MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JULY 24, 1990
L KULL
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. Present at the meeting were:
Mayor Gerald L Farley; Trustees Ralph Arthur, Timothy Corcoran, Leo Floros,
George Van Geem and Theodore Wattenberg. Absent from the meeting was:
Trustee Mark Busse. Also present at the meeting were: Village Manager John
Fulton Dixon, Assistant Village Manager John Burg, Village Attorney Everette
Hill, Public Works Director Herb Weeks, Finance Director David Jepson, Cable
Television Administrator Cheryl Pasalic, Terry Hodnik of Greeley and Hansen,
Executive Director of SWANCC William Abolt, Chamber President Dennis
Saviano, three members of the press and five persons in the audience.
The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of June 26, 1990 were
accepted and filed.
Dick Bachhuber, a member of the Recycling Commission, suggested that the
Commission should be renamed the Waste Control Commission and that the
responsibilities should be broadened. Mayor Farley asked Mr. Bachhuber to bring
this matter to the attention of the Recycling Commission Chairman and to put this
request in writing.
Chamber President Dennis Saviano thanked the Village for the contribution to
Hometown Days. He also said the Chamber has a Task Force to involve
businesses in recycling. The first target area is Kensington Business Center with
Randburst and other areas to follow.
DOW-, 0 =N :_4111mit R744
William Abolt, Executive Director of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook
County, was on hand to explain the proposed transfer station at the intersection
of Des Plaines -River Road and Central Road. The Committee was very
enthusiastic about the proposal, especially the two flood control reservoirs. The
Committee unanimously endorsed the proposed transfer station.
V.
A"
Village Manager Dixon introduced the discussion on the
Utilities System. 'fhe system would cost approximately
expenses to upgrade the system could increase the tot;
Committee discussed a report with revenue estimates and i
of a $15 million Bond Issue. In response to a question,,
said Citizens would probably fight the acquisition and
could reach $500,000.
Mr. Dixon recommended proceeding with further studies
to obtain firmer cost estimates.
Terry Hodnik, of Greeley and Hansen, gave an overvic
studies would include.
The Committee asked various questions about the prol
water quality, required improvements, and possible acqu
water by Citizens by way of an interconnect with Glenv
Don Weibel indicated that if these preliminary costs
majority of the, people in the Citizens Utilities area
purchasing the system.
Mayor Farley and Trustees Van Geem and Floros
approximately $40,000 on further studies until a Public
of the affected area support the acquisition.
Trustees Arthur, Corcoran and Wattenberg felt these
provide more accurate cost estimates and important inf
Since these studies would be required for a Bond Issu
time, they felt the, studies should be done now.
Since there was a deadlock, Mayor Farley said this iss
next Committee of the Whole meeting when Trustee
Mayor Farley requested a Public Hearing for Wedn,
sometime that week at River Trails Junior High to allow
Utilities area to express their opinions.
UQ= MWANd, MAMES
rchase of the Citizens
5 million. Additional
to $20 million. The
financial implications
alage Manager Dixon
,ndemnation expenses
Greeley and Hansen
of what the proposed
acquisition such as
[ of Lake Michigan
correct, he felt the
ild be in favor of
reluctant to spend
inti shows residents
were necessary to
i about the system.
interest of saving
I be discussed at the
is present.
F, September 19 or
dents in the Citizens
Village Attorney Hill explained the two proposed amendments. One requires that
an appeal of the liquor Commissioner's decision shall 'be made to the Circuit
Court. The other allows the Village to post a notice of violation 24 hours before
commencement of any suspension or revocation.
-2.
Village Attorney Hill warned that the State Liquor Commission may give us a
battle on this one. However, the State liquor Commission has done a poor job
on some appeals. It is time to return to local control.
Trustee Wattenberg agreed with the notice of violation. He disagreed with the
appeal to Circuit Court because he feels the Courts are overburdened and he sees
no problem with the current arrangement.
Trustee Van Geem also did not see a problem and felt there is no need for an
appeal to go to Circuit Court. He also asked why we need to put up a notice of
violation. The penalty is closing of the establishment. Why notify patrons?
Village Attorney Hill said some owners have posted misleading signs such as,
"Closed for Repairs." A sign would assist in enforcing the suspension. For
example, at a convenient store, the sip would let customers know the store
cannot sell liquor for a period of time.
Trustee Van Geern asked if other towns" have this notice of violation requirement.
Village Manager'Dixon said Hoffman Estates has had this Ordinance for ten
years. Village Attorney Hill said Palatine has a similar law. Trustee Corcoran
said Chicago posts a violation notice.
Trustee Floros asked if the Village posts signs for Health Code violations. Village,"
Manager Dixon said yes.
Mayor Farley and Trustees Arthur, Corcoran and Floros were in favor of a first
reading of this Ordinance on August 7. Trustees Van Geem, and Wattenberg
were opposed.
L'U I WXWV-#W4&1
MR
At 9:40 p.m., Trustee Arthur moved, seconded by Trustee Van Geem to go into
Executive Session to discuss labor negotiations and acquisition of property. Motion
carried unanimously.
At 10:24 pm, the Committee reconvened into regular session. No action was
taken on any matters discussed in the Executive Session. At 10:25 p.m., Trustee
Van Geem moved, seconded by Trustee Arthur to adjourn the meeting. Motion
carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
/-,� -0
9-rf-, o''
JOHN P. BURG 100K
JPB/rcw Assistant Village Manager
-3-
Phone: 70e / 392-6000
Fax: 708 / 392-6022
A G E N D A
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
August 15, 1990
Trustees$ Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
8:00 P. X.
I.
CALL TO ORDER
Ii.
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 18, 1990 MEETING
TRUSTEES
SUBDIVISIONS
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W BUSSE
Plan Change,
TIMOTHY J. CORCORAN
412-414 Rand Road
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAff MANAGIER
Feet
JOHN FULTON DIXON
C. Plat of Easement, 443 East Rand Road
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A. FIELDS
Phone: 70e / 392-6000
Fax: 708 / 392-6022
A G E N D A
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
August 15, 1990
Trustees$ Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
8:00 P. X.
I.
CALL TO ORDER
Ii.
ROLL CALL
III.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 18, 1990 MEETING
IV.
SUBDIVISIONS
A. Clarewood Subdivision and Comprehensive
Plan Change,
412-414 Rand Road
B. Plat of Dedication - Public Roadway, Schoenbeck Road
from Rand Road North Approximately 400
Feet
C. Plat of Easement, 443 East Rand Road
V.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development Committee
B. Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr.
McGovern
C. Development Code Committee Mr.
Kloster
D. Text Amendment Committee Mr.
Velasco
Vi.
OLD BUSINESS
VII.
NEW BUSINESS
VIII.
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
IX.
ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
AUGUST 1, 1990
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to
order by Chairman Weibel at 8:00 P.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South
Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL
Present upon Roll Call: Frank Boege
Tan Borrelli
Frank Breitsameter
Lynn Kloster
Tom McGovern
Icuis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Absent: William Navigato
Village Staff Present: Michael Sims, Staff Planner
•
Press Staff Present: Larry Smith, Daily herald
Chairman Weibel welcomed two visitors at the meeting, Mr. Lennart Lorenson
a former member of the Plan Commission and mr.Larry Smith from the Daily
Herald.
SUBDIVISIONS
Par 4 Subdivision, 1920 West Golf Road
The applicant requested approval to create a four lot subdivision from an
existing single lot. The site had received a special use permit to allow a
residential Planned Unit Development and would provide access to Golf Road
via a private drive.
Mr. Joel Michalik, representing the owner, was present to explain the
project. Mr. Boege asked why the driveway was to be private rather than
a dedicated road. Mr. Michalik stated that the developer would go either
way but that the Village requested it be private. Mr. Weibel asked about
the location of the sidewalk. The answer was that the developer was flex-
ible and would place the sidewalk along Golf Road or the inside drive
ever the village requested.
It was noted that two street lights would be required in the grass park-
way, however Mr. Weibel remarked that the village ordinance would require
lights on Golf Road and asked if the developer would include a covenant to
the effect that such lights would be installed if and when the State and
Village requested it. Mr. Peter Boland, the developer's attorney, agreed
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2
MEETING OF AUGUST 1, 1990
that this could be done. He commented that the covenant runs with the
ownership and consequently the installation coat would be borne by the
property owner.
Mr. Velasco questioned the prudence of installing the driveway for access
to Golf Road in view of the installation and maintenance cost involved and
the fact that it would only, reduce the required entrances off of Golf Road
by two. Also, he questioned the need to construct it to Village standards.
Mr. Michalik stated that while the developer would have preferred not to
build the driveway, this was requested by Staffoand IDOT had approved the
plan. Mr. Sims stated that Golf was a very busy road and it was advantages
to keep to a minimum the exits/entrances. The driveway would also provide
better access to Gclf.
Mr. Kloster moved, and seconded by Mr. Borrelli, that the applicant's
request for subdivision be approved and the chairman and secretary be
authorized to sign the linen. The vote was,5 'AYE 2 NAY and Chairman
Weibel declared the motion passed.
Mr. Velasco commented that he voted against the motion because, while he
was not against the subdivision, he objected to the added expense that the
homeowners have to pay for the installation and maintenance of the drive-
way. Also, since there would be no heavy traffic(trucks etc.) on the drive-
way he didn't believe it should need to meet village standards.
Mr. Boege stated that he also voted Nay because he felt it should be a
dedicated street and not private which is a reversal of village policy.
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr. Boege that the development code be
modified to waive installation of street lights on Golf Road provided the
petitioner signs a covenant that lights will be installed when requested
by the state. All members voted AYE. Motion passed.
A. Community Development: Mr. Sims reported that the Block Grant report
had been submitted to HUD.
B. Comprehensive Plan: No report
C. Development Code: No report
D. Text Amendment: No report
None
NEW BUSINESS
None
PLAN Ca1MISSION MINUTES PAGE 3
MEETING OF AUGUST 1, 1990
QUESTIONS AND CONMENTS
Mr. Lorenson was a visitor at the meeting. He is a current resident and
trustee of Sanibel, Florida and he commented on requirements and problems
encountered in the processing of petitions and related matters in Florida
as compared to Mount Prospect.
Mr. Sims reported that Des,Plaines had initiated a program in which state
funds received for flood control were used to share the cost of flood
prevention improvements with the residents. There was favorable response
from the members and Mr. Velasco moved, seconded by Mr. Borrelli, tb;
reccmmend a feasibility study be made to dtermine the practicality of a
cost sharing program for permanent flood control improvements for single
family residents. All members voted AYE. Motion passed.
Mr. Boege commented that he felt there had,beeu a lack of communication
between the county, the village and residents concerning the construction
work on Euclid Avenue. He noted that he had been unable to get satisfact-
ory information from the county as to why work was started at 6A.M.,
although it wasn't supposed to begin until 7 A.M.
L-0 �OLAR_1�1_,Rj
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster
Village of ; "ount ProspectMounProspect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM`'
TO: VILLAGE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
RE: CITIZENS UTILITY COMPANY
DATE: JULY 20, 1990
Attached is a memorandum from the Director of Public Works which lays out most of
the factual information concerning the engineering and feasibility studies that have been
done concerning Citizens Utility.
At this point in time I wish to add a few points from the legal and financial standpoint.
Staff has met with the law firm of Moss and Bloomberg who was instrumental in drafting
state statutes that allow for condemnation of utilities, as we had mentioned to the Board
in an earlier memorandum, which is attached. During our discussions with the law firm
they had indicated that there could be substantial legal fees in the hundreds of thousands
of dollars, if this statute would be followed since it would be the first time, and most
likely be contested and challenged all the way through every court appeal possible.
However, this might allow us to find an alternate avenue for lower value. What is
interesting to note is that within the last couple of months, Citizens Utility has been
encouraged by the City of Prospect Heights to propose the purchase of the Prospect
Heights water system for one small area in the City. In doing so, Citizens Utility's
approach was very similar to a fair market value, in fact may be less than that amount.
The opportunity may be presenting itself for us to continue to review the purchase of
Citizens system to see our cost for the system can be reduced
If we review the last report from a financial standpoint we find that the costs for the
system is estimated around just under $15,000,000. In addition, there are additional costs
that would be needed to upgrade the system. Assuming $5,000,000, we would be at the
$20,000,000 cost value for the system.
In reviewing the possible costs that would be acceptable, palatable and payable by those
people in the Citizens Utility area, we have put together some numbers to determine
whether the numbers are within reach so that we could recommend moving ahead with
the next phase of the study.
You will recall that the initial study placed the customers into three specific areas
because of the boundaries which surrounded them, basically major roads. We had
determined earlier that we are not able to provide water to all three
Citizens Utility
June 20, 1990
Page 2 of 2
of the areas without extensive changes to the Joint Action Water Agency System or else
providing water from a separate source. However, we did determine that we could
possibly pick up area number one which represents the smallest area.
We have reviewed the costs of water and sewer revenues for the areas. On Attached
"A" it shows consumption for water sales of .988 million gallons per day. We then went
through and determined the charge that residents in the Citizens Utility pay for their
water services as well as sewer services. Because this area would then be required to
assist in the pay -back of the Lake Michigan Water surcharge we also placed that dollar
amount in the cost calculations and the value is just under $2,000,000 per year.
We then reviewed the cost of being within the Village's water system and that cost
comes out to approximately $1.2 million per year, or an excess that is paid presently of
$772,000 as found on Attachment "B". We then broke it down to a typical user using
7,500 gallons per month and the difference in cost for the Village customer per year
would be $292.50 and for the Citizen Utility customer it would be $508.92.
On Attachment "C" we have extracted the assessed valuation for that area of Citizen
Utility using the new assessed valuations that have just come out. We then determined
that for each one cent of a tax levy there would be $11,000 available in this area. The
debt service on $1,000,000 over a 25 year period of time is placed on the Attachment
"C" as well. Assuming that there would be $15,000,000 needed in order to buy the
system, the annual debt service is laid out for the 20 - 25 year period of time. The
estimated tax rates are also shown. What we need to remember is that about $772,000
would not be paid out by the residents on an annual basis for their water consumption
and could be made available and could reduce the cost shown here by approximately
one-half.
On the bottom of Attachment "C" is a comparison to other special service areas to show
that the estimated tax rate of 1.34 for 20 years or 1.22 for 25 years is not out of line
with other special service area tax rates that have been used in this Village. I believe
that at this time it is prudent for the Village to move forward with the next step of the
Greeley and Hansen proposal for all three studies. This will allow us to be in a position
to have a firmer dollar amount which we may be able to present to the residents. As
we do the financial considerations we find that the numbers appear to be in a palatable
level whether it is a level in which the residents in the Citizen Utility area would wish
to pay or not is a question that still remains unanswered at this time. However, before
there is a meeting with the residents in the area I think it would be prudent for us to
go through the next phase of studies that are recommended by Greeley and Hansen.
RFD/caf
Atts.
CITIZENS UTILITIES CUSTOMERS IN MOUNT PROSPECT
Water and Sewer Revenues
Number of Customers and Water Use
Number of Customers
Water Use (MGD)
Less Unaccounted for (15%)
Water Sales (MGD)
Water & Sewer Revenue
Water Charge
Customer Charge
Water Sales
Sewer Charge
Service Charge
Lake Michigan Water Surcharge
Water Sales
Total Revenue
Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total
156 1,466 1,990 3,612
.046
.454
.662
1.162
<.007>
<.068>
<.099>
<.174>
.039
.386
.563
.988
3,612 x $4.00 x 12 = $ 173,376
.988 x 365 x 1,000 x $2.35 - 8471457
$1,020,833
3,612 x $11.18 x 12 = $ 484,586
$1,505,419
.988 x 365 x 1,000 x $1.28 4619594
1/96740070
e
Comparison or
Village wotcz and Sewer Charges
to Citizens Utilities Water and Sewer Charges
Village water a Sower Charge
Water & Sewer Charge ,988 x 365 x 1,008 ` $2.50 = $ 901,550
SSA #5 Tax Levy $108,714,000 x .0027 = 293,528
Total Village Hater and Sewer Charges jj4jL5=LO78
Citizens Utilities Chargee $1,967,808
Village Charges _1,J95,000
Excess of Citizens Utilitee over Village L~���OOO
Comparison of
Annual Cost or Typical User
7,500 Gallons per Month
Village of Mount Prospect Customers
Notoc and Sewer Charge $225.00
Special Service Area #5 _-67.50>
Citizens Utilities Customers
Water and Sewer Charge $393.72
Louc Michigan Water Surcharge _115.20/
Excess of Citizens Utilities Customers over Village Customers JZ16.42�
^_
CITIZENS UTILITIES CUSTOMERS IN nuum7 PROSPECT
Financing Information
Equalized Assessed Valuation
Total Village EAv $735,079,199
Less Exv for Special Service Area #s _625,155,406
E«v for Citizens Utilities Area $109.9Z2,M
Each 10 or a tax levy would produce $11,000
Debt Service Coot per $1 Million
7-1/2% 20 years $98,108
7-1/2% 25 years $89,700
20 years
25 years
$15 Million Bond Issue
Annual Debt Service
$1,471,500
$/,345,500
Estimated Tux Rate
$1.34
$1.22
Cost per $25,000 EAY
$334
$305
Other
SSA Tax Rates (1988)
SS #1
Prospect Meadows Water System
$ .954
55 #2
Golf viav Estates water
$1.237
SS #6
George/Albert 5tcoot
$1.013
'-1111age cfjaunt Prospect.:.�
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON
FROM:
ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE:
FEBRUARY 2, 1990
SUBJECT:
CITIZENS UTILITIES ACQUISITION:
LEGAL COUNSEL
Pursuant to Board direction, the Village Manager, Public Works Director and Assistant
Village Manager met with principals from the law firm of Moss and Bloomberg, Ltd., for
the purpose of identifying the legal issues associated with the purchase of the Citizens
Utilities system. Messrs. Barry L. Moss and George A. Marchetti reviewed with Village
staff the firm's expertise in (1) dealing with Citizens Utilities Company and (2) their
experience in water system purchases and related litigation.
Firm Credentials
Mr. Moss indicated that his firm has served as General Counsel to the Village of
Bolingbrook for the past ten years. Bolingbrook has the unenviable burden of having
Citizens Utilities Company provide water and sewer service to approximately two-thirds
of the Village's residents and businesses. Moss and Bloomberg, Ltd., has represented
Bolingbrook's interests in all dealings with Citizens Utilities Company including, but not
limited to, rate hearings, original cost issues and service area issues. In the latter regard,
the Village of Bolingbrook was recently successful in litigation with Citizens to determine
what areas within that community Citizens' had a legal right to extend service into.
Mount Prospect staff felt that the knowledge that Messrs. Moss and Marchetti's firm had
in the areas of (1) water and sewer systems; (2) Illinois Commerce Commission
jurisdiction and regulations and (3) their intimate knowledge of Citizens Utilities
Company as an adversary in litigation and rate making cases would prove invaluable
should the Board wish to proceed with acquisition.
It is also important to note that Moss and Bloomberg, Ltd., were the principal drafters
of Public Act 83-1466, which provided for an alternate means of placing a value on a
water and sewerage system. Previously, the only recognized method was "replacement
cost less depreciation." Under the new legislation, it is passible to determine the worth
of a system using a "fair cash market value" analysis. In most cases, this latter formula
will result in a substantially lower cost figure. Mr. Moss cited as precedent for this a
California case in which a municipality utilized similar legislation to purchase a Citizens'
owned water and sewer system at a fair market cash value of approximately $5 million
whereas, the replacement cost less depreciation formula had valued the system at at least
518 million.
The legislation in Illinois is modeled after laws like that in California. However, it has
not yet been used here and there are strong indications that any attempt to do so would
result in litigation over its validity. Messrs. Moss and Marchetti feel that the Statute
would withstand such a challenge. The fact that such a challenge is almost assured
should not by itself be viewed as a deterrent to proceeding in this direction because it
is likely that it will become necessary at some point to initiate eminent domain
proceedings which are in and of themselves resolved in the Courts.
Bgic Issue
While this initial meeting was an opportunity to gauge the expertise of Messrs. Moss and
Bloomberg in this area and to get an overall feel for the "legal" aspects of any
acquisition attempt, staff was able to get answers to certain basic issues:
1. What problems, if any, could be anticipated if the Village were to purchase
that portion of the Citizens system within the Village and left the Prospect
Heights portion to stand alone?
In the first instance, the Illinois Commerce Commission would not have jurisdiction
over this mgtter and so the Village is spared the time and expense of a Hearing
before this administrative body. While the ICC does not get involved in the
acquisition question, the "condition" of the remaining Citizens Utilities system does
become a crucial issue in determining the overall acquisition cost of the system.
As you may recall, during the presentation by Terry Hodnick of Greeley and
Hansen, it was noted that acquisition of any or all of the Mount Prospect portion
of the system would create deficiencies in the remaining Citizens system. These
deficiencies might require Citizens to construct new pumping, storage and sewage
handling facilities as well as new wells, or to acquire an alternate Lake Michigan
water source, in order to allow the remaining system to continue in operation.
Once acquisition costs are determined, the issue of establishing a cost for these
deficiencies (damages) would be a major concern of the Court.
2. Was Greeley and Hansen's approach to valuation valid?
Messrs. Moss and Marchetti were asked to review the Greeley and Hansen report
and to comment on its validity. They found the report to be valid overall
inasmuch as it followed the traditional "replacement cost less depreciation"
formula.
They also concurred in the fact that purchase of the Mount Prospect portion of
the system would create deficiencies in the remaining Citizens' system thereby
raising the issue of damages. Messrs. Moss and Marchetti indicated that they had
worked with Greeley and Hansen in the past regarding matters germane to past
attempts by Bolingbrook to acquire Citizens' system down there.
The value of this initial meeting was that it identified a potential alternate means for
arriving at a value for the system.. While this alternate means is available, it is not
without certain potential pitfalls. First, it has been Messrs. Moss and Marchetti's
experience that Citizens Utilities will not get serious regarding negotiations for purchase
until the Village has filed Eminent Domain Proceedings. Second, the Statutory language
regarding "fair cash market value" is untested and would likely result in some type of
appeal on that issue. Third, since the issue of cost would probably be decided by a jury,
it is uncertain which formula they would embrace; i.e., "fair cash market value" or
"replacement cost less depreciation," or whether they might be inclined to "split the
difference." Fourth, if the Village decides to pursue purchase through Eminent Domain
and a decision regarding value is rendered, the Village must proceedpurchase h
Uourt costs of Citizens Utilitigs mociated with tbij 1" " " ('you can't have your cake
and eat it too"). Finally, Messrs. Moss and Marchetti indicated that Citizens Utilities
Company is not adverse to litigation and will in all likelihood launch a very strong public
campaign to discourage the Village from pursuing acquisition. They will talk in terms
of astronomical costs for purchase of the system as well. as raising doubts about the
Village's ability to prevail in Court. In this regard, they are sophisticated and well
armed.
Conclusion
It is clear that pursuit of acquisition is a matter which requires thorough review and
consensus on the part of elected officials and Citizens Utilities' customers. If there is
interest in acquisition after identifying the worst case scenario, then there is merit in
proceeding. Through the process of Eminent Domain and the existing legislation, there
is a possibility that the Village could find itself purchasing the system for substantially
less than the $14 .million identified in the Greeley and Hansen report.
A prudent next step may be to authorize a fair cash market value study of the Citizens'
system to determine what the best cas scenario might be.
S
MEJ/rcw
WU "111-139 —11 CHAi�R U —QRS AND VtLLAG8s 150{
es, � lIY�B
Awcod* 111-1111-11 lManklpal Code lssi
11 -twit. t. Boa dleow as .CeealO lit pwonuw4m of
dwift
1.11-Is11-11. 1% bolder of any bond or of any coupon
of say bond issued under this Division 189 may by
avis auction to Compel performance of an duties required by
this Divi,ion 189, Including the making sad collection of
sant rates for the purposes specified M this Division
1719 and the application of the revenue therefrom to time
Amended by P.A. 77-942, 1 1, W. Aug. 17, 1971.
FiLr.
Foment dOmaln-�h�rns
-12. For that purpose of enquiring, constructing, or improving any Combined waterworks
age system under this Division 199, or any
PmPercY necessary or appropriate therefor, any munkipsl.
ity bus the right of eminent domain, as provided by Article
VII of the Code of Civil Procedure, as heretofore and
hereafter amended.1
T1ts fair cash market value of an existing waterworks
end sewerage system, or portion thereof, scguired under
tbis Division 139, which existing system 'a a spea,l rase
propwrty as dellned in Article Vit of the "Code of Civil
Procedure", approved August 19, 1981, as heretofore or
r amended,may be determined in aocordsaw with
the following valuation principles.
7"be fair cash market value of existing fae ities, whether
MW or personal, may be determined by utilizing the net
fetor the which axe atinbutable bs oho f in question
n is over typo remainingmuaefvdCorfe of the
fea7ities earnings may be ca piealized under an m-
nuity capitalization and disosunted to present val.
ue Tisa fair c,sh market value of any ions, addi-
tiom or improvemar b of itae existing system msde subse.
quemt W the date that the oondemmatiom is filed
M ay be determined by uta? zing the probable net earnings
attributable to the facilities in question over theremaining
life of the facilities, The probe bic earnings may be capir
tahzeld under an atmuity capitalization method and dis-
WMAW present value.
Thd value of the land and easements upon which the
fad'ltiaa ars situated may be determined in accordance
with the foregoing espies, giving dpe account to the
spacial use of the property for water and sewerage Pur.
pulled -
For the of this Section no prior approval of the
lUhWW Commerce Commission, or any other body having
jurisdiction over the existing system, shall be required
Amended by P.A. 83-1466, 1 1, off. Jan. 1, 1985.
I hapset 110. 17-101 at seq.
Divisiow r44 oval Sswery oatowe iruaieipal Boaadariu
11-140-1.
Authorization,—Costs.
11-140-8
Special assessment or special tsxatiom.
11-140-.8.
Acquisition of prop".
11-140-L
Ordinance.
11-140-0.
Proceedings—taws Governing.
PA-9a4d►
11-110-8. Bond,.
11-140-1. Authorla zoos ay
1 11-140-1. In evary munitdpenty, with, , population of
100,000 or seta which has s sewage system but las no
adequate outlet therefor, or any proper dish of tiro
aewW thereof, without constructing an outlet Saawwa %a
terminus Of which will be outside the corporate wits of
the tract panty, the corporate auk thereof my (1)
Comatraact ,n outlet aewar, wholly without, or W6,0y
within and partially without the corporsta limits of the
municipality into which the sewers throughout the mnml
pelity are to empty, sod through which the sewers aro to
dime their sewage for proper disposition wed sanitary
benefits, (g) constructerect pumping works,°e+u htt°ar5, ,Cod plants for tits pmt of the sewage
wtbim or without the acrpor,te Grmita of tit, municipality,
(711 acquire the hued and mscilnery for those
and (4) otherwise provide for disnhrrge of the
municipality S sewage into obanneh that w7l promote the
healtla sod improve oho sanitary condition of and secoon.
push oho purpose of am outlet Sewer for oho municipality.
71oe cost of ezerniaing the povera rmmferred by this section
shall be turue by specialassessment or by special tasation
upon the property in those PorbM of the municipality the
sewers in which aro ultimately to find their outlet through
the outlet sewer so comstrueted.
11-140-t Spect,l assessment or special t,rcatti,,
1 11-140-2 The corporate authorities of such m
pality may maintain and keep in repair the outlet severe,
purification plants, reservoirs, pumping worka, and me.
chinery provided for in Section 11-140-1„ The cost of the
maintenance and repair 3ha0 be burns by special ,eases.
meat or by special taxaticm upon the property specified in
Sectlou 11-140-L No lot, block, or pa real of lanai sbsn he
assessed more than once uo any one year for such maimt,
mance and repair.
11-140-8. Acquisition of property
1 11-140-8. The Corporate authorities of melt a mnnlr
p a&7 my acquire byg, condemnation, or
otherwise, sn the real srad personal property, rights<K-
wry. anis easements within or without the corporate Moire
Of the municipality necessary for the construction and
maintenance of the cutlet sewers and works mthorised by
Section 11-140-1. The corporate authorities have the
saroue control and jurisdiction of this property which is
without sua of that which is within the municipality,
11-140.4. Ordinance
1 11-140-4. When the corporate authorities of a mar
nic(pality determine to construct improvement pmvkkd
for in Section 11-140-1, they shall do so by an ordinance
which shell prescribe whether the improvements shun be
meds by spacial assessment or by sly taxaticm Tisa
o shall also prescribe the mature, character, load.
ty, and description of the haproveno moa, either by setting
forth the same in the ordinance itself, or by reference to
mats, plate, plans, profiles, or specifications tlersuf on filo
in the office of the municipal clerk, or by both methods..
The ordinance Shap aha desmU by roasmnably well
understood boundaries, those portions of the counkipshty
the sewerage of which is to be conducted by sewers
already laid, or by those contemplated to be Iaid, into and
1% pro
for the
Is to be
owleme
11-110.4
of the
mg I
bag of th
mdcws t
rashes a
Collector
sake on
to maks,
ofthe
the no
wan as p
the wort
far as ti
therewitl
1 Pare
11-140-1
do of t
for by t
Section I
with the
I hrag
11-141-f
11-141-f
V L 6 L N 1 0 3 ON n 0=1
einsolou3
saYsr-L
JOUUBd 'SPJBMP3 'S UEIIV
ale!oossv °X!UPOH gouaijal
N3SNVH CINV ATI331:19
'Alnil lJ9A sinoA
vopeieps= alqejoAel inoA of piemiol
Tool pue sepniswelsAsuoiIn iAiqpls!pjalemjojseoas6uijBOUIBUBOP!AoidoltesodoldsIL4131wqns
of Artimioddo et4l empeidde 9M -uoW zuoL41ne inoA uodn 4iom vels of alqel!eAe eie eM
'0661 'a Ajeruqe4
uo peujwqns AIsn0lAaid sresodoid jo suoisiaA palapdn eie III pue 11 SOSel4d J01 sfesodoid
eLU -Butleew ino 6uunp passnosip s3 sej Apnis letioildo sapnioui osle )POm I 8seLld
'MalAU91E) 10 86811!A OL41 UJOJI POJ9AIlap jamm tiel5poiVi aMe-1 Idsooe
of C pue 3 -1. seajV uoirsinboV ui paimbei sivawaAoidwi eumma - III OsL4d
*t43jou i9t43inj ainjonils AJOA118P vmvr majis uiooul'i atz
joe9joeoiAissei4l4jt4solpaiinbeiSIU9W9AOjdwiuiL,wialemelenIBA3-1lssBt4d
'SIL45laH loadsoid ui
sweisAsiaiemlouoivsmboepasodoid,sairi!insuazli!ojoloedwissessv-loseLld
:smollo; se smt4d aejL41 olui Niom at4l pepIA!p 9ALIL4
aM salpnis uo!lnq!j7is!p waisAs Tamm jol seowas Bulisetifte jol lesodoid e v.wqns of poseeld
Sl uasueH pue AejeeiC) l0661 19 aunt uo uo)oo uqor tom 6utleew mo Lom ooLjepj000e ui
:Smaam ivy iea(3
SeOIAJ9S 6uu88ul6U3 jol lesodOJd
saipnlS waisAS uoilnqljzs!a i9jeM :loaf
pne
gsoog siouilll loodsOld junovy
PeO8 IBJW90 ISOM OOL L
PadsOJd iunoyy jo 96ell!A
s)IioM oilqnd 10 J0108J10
SNOOM 1 VOCIJOH 'Ivy
0661 'ZZ aunt
M"Org (?tC) - S969 90909 SIONJ711 '00v3lw3'V7Vld 301Se3AW H.LnOS ZZZ h -,"ns I SI":-
ttlfv,e *3
S W 3 3 N I V N 3
3son., 1
SAVO,
NBSNVH 0 N V A 3 "1 3 3 tJ Ell
".m
SOWWO
"wr'NOC"' 31,'),. Sp
NIft3"1Z " IW380.
"a"Ve
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STUDIES
Greeley and Hansen
June 1990
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The PROJECT comprises furnishing engineering services required for additional water system
distribution studies, conducted in three phases, to provide preliminary evaluations as follows:
Phase I
Impact of Citizens Utility Company's proposed acquisition of the Rob Roy and Fairway
water systems, owned by the City of Prospect Heights, on the possible acquisition of
Citizens Utility Company's water system, located in Areas 1, 2 and 3, by the Village of
Mount Prospect. Study areas are located as shown on Figure 1. The impact
assessment will analyze water system improvements required for two alternate
acquisition outcomes:
I. Alternate 1 -The Prospect Heights area becomes part of the water system acquired
by the Village of Mount Prospect.
2. 69anaiiI - The Prospect Heights area remains part of the Citizens Utility Company
water system after acquisition actions are completed by the Village of Mount
Prospect.
These analyses will be based on continuing to serve the future Mount Prospect
acquisition areas with water supplied by existing JAWA delivery paints. The status of
a possible project to construct a JAWA delivery main in Wolf Road from the 1-90 Tollway
north to Foundry Road will also be discussed.
Additional Water System Studies that may be included under Phase I at the Village's
option include:
2Q90_n1 - Develop water and sanitary sewer improvement costs for adding the
Mudville service area for the Village's acquisition area. This area is presently served
by private well and septic systems. See Figure 1
. Option 2 - Prepare for and attend one special meeting with residents.
Option 3 - Provide qualitative evaluation of how proposed commingling of well and
Lake Michigan water by Citizens Utility Company will affect overall water quality in
Areas 1, 2 and 3. Compare results with Drinking Water Standards. Evaluation to be
based on existing water quality test data available from the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency.
Phase 11
Determine water main improvements to the Mount Prospect water distribution system
to shift the service area of the Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency
(JAWA) Lincoln Street structure further north. For the current water system service
areas, the objective is to increase the quantity of flow deliverable at the Lincoln Street
structure while reducing the Highland Avenue JAWA structure service area. Results of
these analyses to be used to prepare a preliminary estimate of additional capacity
available at the Highland Avenue JAWA structure to serve customers of the Citizens
Utilities Chicago Suburban System within the Village limits, shown on Figure 1 as Areas
1, 2 and 3.
Long range planning studies (beyond the year 1985) are not available for the Mount
Prospect water system. The intent of the Phase 11 study is to approximate required
water main improvements using previous distribution system hydraulic network analysis
computer models developed by the Fletcher Engineering Company for 1985 water use
conditions. Future water use conditions will be superimposed on an updated version
of the existing distribution system model.
Phase III
Determine water system improvements required in Areas 1, 2 and 3 to accept Lake
Michigan water delivered from the Village of Glenview. The Village of Glenview
purchases Lake Michigan water from the Village of Wilmette.
B. SCOPE OF SERVICES BY GREELEY AND HANSEN
1 Phase I
a. Obtain Basic Data
Obtain and review basic data, including a 1988 report prepared for the City of
Prospect Heights, Prospect Heights' water system maps and water supply, pumping
and storage facility capacity data. Discuss status of possible JAWA delivery main
in Wolf Road with JAWA management personnel.
Obtain and review basic data for optional studies as authorized, including:
• Option 1 - Obtain lot location maps showing individual residences and
verity with field survey in the Mudville service area.
• Option 3 - Water quality data for existing Citizens Utility Chicago Suburban
system and Lake Michigan water delivered by Glenview from Wilmette.
b. Analyze Improvements
Describe and analyze alternative improvements to serve the Prospect Heights service
area under acquisition outcome Alternates 1 and 2 described in paragraph A. above.
Describe and analyze improvements for optional studies as authorized, including:
. Option I - Adding the Mudville service area to the Village's acquisition area.
c. Comparative Opinion of Probable Cost of Construction
Provide comparative opinion of probable construction cost for alternative improve-
ments required for the Prospect Heights service area, and for optional study under
Option 1 - Providing water and sewer service to the Mudyille service area.
d. Prepare Report
Summarize Phase I analyses and results in a letter report, including optional studies
as authorized by the Village. Submit 12 copies of the final report to the Village,
e. Meetings
Attend one meeting with Village staff to review preliminary study findings and receive
comments for the final report.
Make presentation to Village Board summarizing study results.
Option 2 - Prepare for and attend one meeting with Village residents to
explain findings and answer questions.
2. Phase 11
a. Obtain Basic Data
I
Obtain and review basic data including 1980, 1982 and 1984 hydraulic network
analyses reports prepared by Fletcher Engineering Company, JAWA delivery
capacity data, historical maximum day water use data and Lake Michigan allocation
data.
b. Recommend Additional Hydraulic Analyses
Define conditions for additional hydraulic network analyses to be performed by
Fletcher Engineering company. Alternative water main improvements to be
evaluated include:
Alternative 12 or 16 -inch main connection in Lincoln Street from the JAWA
structure at Elmhurst Road west to Busse Road and east to Emerson
Street.
Alternative water main improvements to improve flow distribution from the
Lincoln Street JAWA structure to the north. Such improvements may
include a 12 -inch main in Wa Pella Avenue from Lincoln Street north,
connecting an existing 12 -inch main across the C&NW railroad tracks and
Northwest Highway.
c. Comparative Opinion of Probable Cost of Construction
Provide comparative opinion of probable construction cost for alternative improve-
ments.
d. Compare Alternative improvements
Compare alternative improvements including opinions of probable construction cost
and ability to shift flow from the Lincoln Street location.
9. Prepare Report
Summarize Phase 11 analyses and results in a letter report. Submit 12 copies of final
report to Village.
I. Meeting
Attend one meeting with Village staff to review preliminary study findings and receive
comments for final report.
3. Phase III
a. Obtain Basic Data
Obtain and review basic data regarding proposed Lake Michigan water supply from
the Village of Glenview, including expected delivery point location, delivery pressure
and flow design capacities, and proposed system operation. Use Lake Michigan
water allocations by IDOT to estimate future water use.
b. Analyze Improvements
Describe and analyze alternative improvements to deliver Lake Michigan water to
Areas 1, 2 and 3 via the Wilmette -Glenview connection. Analyses will include a
review of pumping and storage facility requirements and preliminary computer
modeling of the water distribution system to evaluate alternative water main
improvements.
c. Comparative Opinion of Probable Cost of Construction
Provide comparative opinion of probable construction cost for alternative improve-
ments.
d. Prepare Report
Summarize Phase III analyses and results in a letter report. Submit 12 copies of final
report to Village.
e. Meeting
Attend a meeting with Village staff to review preliminary study findings and receive
comments for final report.
C. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1. Assemble basic data from existing Village records.
2. Arrange and pay for additional hydraulic computer modeling analyses by Fletcher Engineering
Company under Phase 11.
3. Forward correspondence requesting system design information from City of Prospect Heights
for Phase I and Village of Glenview for Phase 111.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND COMPENSATION
4--ou
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STUDIES - PHASE I
Greeley and Hanson
June 1990
Estimated Direct
Labor - Hours
PHASE I
PROSPECT HEIGHTS STUDY
Project
Text
Partner
Manager
Engineer
Editing
A. ESTIMATED MANHOURS
1. Obtain Basic Data
0
12
6
2
2. Analyze Improvements
2
10
28
0
3. Opinions of Cost
1
2
12
0
4. Letter Report
2
8
16
6
5. Meetings
0
16
1 0
0
Total - Phase 1
5
48
62
8
B. ESTIMATED COMPENSATION
1. Estimated Direct Labor Costs
Partner
5 hours
@
$46.00
$ 225
Project Manager
48 hours
@
$30.50
1,464
Engineer
62 hours
@
$18.00
1,116
Text Editing
8 hours
@
$12.00
96
Subtotal
$2,901
2. Estimated Indirect Costs and Fee
Direct Labor x 2-0
$S,802
3. Other Direct Costs
Local Travel 100 miles @ $0.26
$ 26
Reproduction
isi
Computer - 10 hours @ $12.00
120_
Subtotal
$ 229
Total Estimated Compensation - Phase I - Prospect Heights Study
$9,000
PHASE I
OPTIONAL STUDIES
1. Option 1
7,500
2. Option 2
1,500
3. Option 3
2-500
Total Estimated Compensation - Phase 1
$20,50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND COMPENSATION
F;M—
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STUDIES - PHASE 11
Greeley and Hansen
June 1990
NOTE:
(1) Does not include costs for hydraulic analyses by Fletcher Engineering Co.
Estimated Direct Labor - Hours
Project
Text
PHASE 11
Partner
Manager
Engineer
Editing
A. ESTIMATED MANHOURS
1.
Obtain Basic Data
0
4
10
2
2-
Additional Hydraulic
Analyses
2
4
10
1
3.
Opinions of Cost
1
2
14
0
4.
Comparison of
Alternatives
1
2
12
0
5.
Letter Report
2
8
12
6
6.
Meetings
0
4
1 0
1
Total - Phase 11
6
24
58
10
B. ESTIMATED COMPENSATION
1.
Estimated Direct Labor Costs
Partner
6 hours
@
$45.00
$ 270
Project Manager
24 hours
@
S30.50
732
Engineer
58 hours
@
$18.00
1,044
Text Editing
10 hours
@
$12.00
120
Subtotal
$ Z166
2.
Estimated Indirect Costs and Fee
Direct Labor x 2.0
$4,332
3.
Other Direct Costs
Local Travel 100 miles @ S0.26
$ 26
Reproduction
104
Computer - 6 hours @ $12.00
72
Subtotal
$ 202
Total Estimated Compensation - Phase 11
$ 6,700("
NOTE:
(1) Does not include costs for hydraulic analyses by Fletcher Engineering Co.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND COMPENSATION
FOR
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STUDIES • PHASE III
Greeley and Hansen
June 1990
Estimated Direct Labor - Hours
Project
Text
PHASE III
Partner
Manager
Engineer
Editing
A. ESTIMATED MANHOURS
1. Obtain Basic Data
0
4
8
2
2. Analyze Improvements
2
8
47
0
3. Opinions of Cost
1
2
12
0
4. Letter Report
2
8
16
6
S. Meetings
0
4
0
0
Total - Phase 111
5
26
83 7-8
B. ESTIMATED COMPENSATION
1. Estimated Direct Labor Costs
Partner
5 hours
@
$45.00
$ 225
Project Manager
26 hours
@
$30.50
793
Engineer
83 hours
@
$18.00
1,494
Text Editing
8 hours
@
$12.00
96
Subtotal
$ Z608
2. Estimated Indirect Costs and Fee
Direct Labor x 2.0
$5,216
3. Other Direct Costs
Local Travel 100 miles @ $0.26
$ 26
Reproduction
130
Computer - 10 hours @ $12.00
120
Subtotal
$ 276
Total Estimated Compensation • Phase 111
$8,1010
D -
AIR
``",.ii � a'�"ao�i .h'a.w✓ �. �rt`� ® �" •e �`�y 3i s � $114tOn � ,r
AM
- w i 4 .. .. 4 o . ■ MYMI d` f ��.`"�+rrr+w.w.. 0..._.!+*F""'
y *.... .;..v. 5cp'+va4.
k +e^ 1 '..'y�"C'+ 1 µ� •�4 tl +�+ P1 rkl� C:i, G `t�► rt .. 1 J" .. "+0.
` — �
Us
wood-
vr' C t + w $e Job= we.c eJa
Sob
HOghts
..'lIM S OPOun "`.--..• ......,,.*$• GAAOI n nrC bOKA w `" Gan St
y. v»anaar _ c.sv . ,�vat Wo"r,—
Pob0 Roy, e
+.. +Y „�+ 5�. i' ..Cm
,± .. .•, t: *Goll �T.b
;RDPMpyC z x'
8r Re Mttoy
aa
. # o
5 bnta b Dam No 2p `
Woods
kw a
i �rt
p
n
4 Ca ne
w
�
:,7Z
' W
;.GmP p ne N
Ov
.": `� �Y V i i40
M1t,. ++„ *�� „gym l .. _ ._.....•., µ _.
p 630
on
en Poge 4
r
P't
W7
? r� „ ShooPn Cenler �.srCE
PtC PELT 9 wrV.
$M655`I '•..� "' Sw as
fSw•n rk S3Ot
ay +
a
Qt "" 4f. 14 -i.: •w p"' 5``"�, "^ I s Vk far ' _
f5k �*Ito` `r5. Sx V Y tl •t •�." F` .. '""' rl,`Y"r`, L-
"1. .. GaX'$�`oMr
tit � v:. rw"ei�s r«5.� a i r,l �' -- i �:�°�.....,:._....,:___"�. - '3 � •.-. ....,._,. _..
MIMyeti,,..n � tw i e r
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: July 11, 1990
SUBJECT: Feasibility Review for Possible
Acquisition of Chicago Suburban Water and
Sewer Systems Currently Owned by
Citizens Utility Company
In 1975, consulting engineers, Metcalf & Eddy, were commissioned
to undertake a feasibility study on acquisition of the water and
sewer utility in the northeast section of the Village owned by
Citizens Utility Company. That study put a cost of approximate-
ly $13 million on the proposed acquisition. Initial negotia-
tions indicated that Citizens Utility was not amenable to dis-
posing of the property and was not in agreement over its worth.
The issue of the acquisition of this property was then deferred
indefinitely.
In the summer of 1989, the Village again received requests from
the citizens served by this utility company asking that the
Village once again pursue acquisition of Chicago Suburban Water
and Sewer Systems. Accordingly, on July 18, 1989, the Village
Board awarded a contract to Greeley and Hansen to conduct a
study of acquisition feasibility; the cost for the scope of
services amounted to $22,200. That report was completed in Janu-
ary 1990, and the engineers' estimate of cost for the water and
sewer systems less depreciation was $14,669,000. That figure is
approximately $1.5 million more than the figure indicated in the
1975 Metcalf & Eddy report. It appears that the reason the
figures have remained so close through the intervening years is
that depreciation and inflation of construction costs of the
system have remained relatively unchanged.
Since the 1975 Metcalf & Eddy report, the Village has changed
its source of water supply. We now receive water from the Joint
Action Water Agency (JAWA), and our wells are on stand-by sta-
tus. When the Village was in the planning stage for purchasing
of Lake Michigan water, Citizens Utility Company (Chicago Subur-
ban Water and Sewer Systems) was invited to participate in re-
ceiving lake water. They chose not to and have, instead, re-
mained on well water to this date. The EPA has it on record
that Citizens Utility Company water contains levels of radium in
excess of allowable standards. Citizens has, therefore, negoti-
ated a contract with the Village of Glenview for water supply
via a transmission line. Recent contact with the Village of
Glenview has indicated that the contracts for design of a pump-
ing station and transmission line have been approved and have
been awarded to Consoer, Townsend & Associates.
There is still a lawsuit pending, which involves the Village of
Glenview, Citizens Utility Company, and the former owner of
Northfield Woods Utility Company. Allegedly, this utility compa-
ny had a franchised area adjacent to the Village of Glenview
and, at the time Glenview purchased the system, there was a lot
of undeveloped property within the franchised area. Part of the
agreement between the Village of Glenview and the former owner
of Northfield Woods utility Company stipulated that, during the
15 -year period after the sale, Glenview would assess a connec-
tion fee to all new customers and turn that money over to the
former owner. When this owner found out that -Citizens Utility
Company and the Village of Glenview were contemplating an agree-
ment to furnish water to Citizens Utility Company, he sued both
Glenview and Citizens Utility for connection fees, based upon
the original agreement.
I understand the lawsuit was going to treat each of Citizens'
customers as a separate connection. Last winter, the lower
court finally threw out the lawsuit. However, in February 1990,
the case was appealed and was scheduled for appellate court
review. I understand that the Village of Glenview is optimistic
that they will win the case; however, the ruling is not expected
before late this fall. In the meantime, and as stated before-
hand, design of the pumping station and pipeline has been author-
ized.
It is projected that, if the courts again dismiss the case and
there is no appeal, the interconnection between the two water
systems could be in place by late 1991. Neither the Village of
Glenview nor Citizens Utility Company has acquired any rights-
of-way, licenses, permits, etc., from any agency for this con-
struction work. They will be depending upon substantial amounts
of right-of-way from the Cook County Forest Preserve; however,
traditionally, that agency has not been the easiest to acquire
rights-of-way from. If the appellate court determines that the
former owner has the right to a connection fee, then the Village
of Glenview will defer action on supplying Chicago Suburban
Water and Sewer Systems with water until the end of their agree-
ment with the former owner of Northfield Woods Utility Company.
The expiration date of that 15 -year agreement is July of 1992.
In the initial study by Greeley and Hansen, the Chicago Suburban
Water and Sewer Systems area was divided into three sections for
acquisition, with Area #1 being the least disruptive to the
existing Mount Prospect system. Areas #2 and #3 would require
additional storage, improvements within their system and the
Village's system, and increased flow rate from JAWA. Copy of
the study area is attached.
It was concluded that the JAWA connection point at Highland and
Emerson would not be adequate to supply water at a reasonable
pressure to all of the Citizens Utility Company franchised ar-
ea. The study, as originally commissioned to Greeley and
Hansen, took into consideration that Chicago Suburban Water and
Sewer Systems also serves a portion of Prospect Heights, and it
was thought that Prospect Heights may purchase that area of
Citizens Utility Company which lies within their corporate bound-
aries.
Recently, the City of Prospect Heights made public that they are
considering the sale of a very small water system, which they
currently operate, within their corporate boundaries; the pur-
chaser would probably be Citizens Utility Company. Recent infor-
mation is that Prospect Heights may be planning a referendum in
November of this year to pose a question to its citizens on the
sale of this small system.and on whether or not the majority of
those Prospect Heights residents who are on private wells would
want an area -wide water system developed in their community.
Informational meetings are presently scheduled with Prospect
Heights citizens to discuss these issues. The first meeting is
scheduled for July 19 at the Hersey High School auditorium. The
possibility that the City of Prospect Heights would sell its
existing small system to Citizens Utility Company (and obviously
not want to be a participant in the Village's acquisition of
that utility company) is a matter that would require additional
study so that the Village can determine its feasibility. It is
projected that the additional study for the impact of Prospect
Heights actions would cost $20,500.
Several questions still would have to be resolved. Some major
system improvements of our distribution system would have to be
addressed; i.e., the flow at the Lincoln Avenue JAWA connection
point would have to be increased in order to accommodate the
Village residents in the center of our community. This would
involve changing valves within the station to allow the extra
water to flow out, plus connection of large -diameter pipelines
from the station east to Emerson Street and west to Busse Road.
These improvements would cost in excess of $500,000. It would
also be necessary to increase the size of the valves at the
Highland Avenue/Emerson JAWA connections to accommodate the
increased flow to the Citizens Utility service area. The cost
for Greeley and Hansen's study to evaluate the water main im-
provement would be approximately $6700.
It is Greeley and Hansen's recommendation that Fletcher Engi-
neers be engaged to make a hydraulic analysis of our system
before any further plans are made. Again, complete analysis of
our system would have to be made by an independent consultant to
determine if the proper flow of water could be obtained through
the existing JAWA transmission main.
Preliminary findings indicate that the JAWA water supply to
Mount Prospect would not be adequate to serve the entire service
area of Chicago Suburban Water and Sewer Systems and that an
alternate water supply would be needed. Accordingly, it was
determined that, if the Village were to purchase the system, it
may be cost-effective for the Village of Mount Prospect to enter
into an agreement with the Village of Glenview for an alternate
water supply. Although Citizens Utility Company has indicated
that they are considering some internal improvements to their
system after acquisition of water through Glenview, our engi-
neers have not had the opportunity to address those modifica-
tions in order to determine whether or not those improvements
would be adequate. It is projected that this phase of the study
would cost an additional $8100.
A further concern on my part is that, if Prospect Heights does
not want to participate with the Village of Mount Prospect in
purchasing the existing water system, would the court systems
allow the Village to remove the existing pumping and storage
facilities, all of which are currently located within the Vil-
lage of Mount Prospect corporate limits. The off-the-cuff as-
sumption would be that they would not. Consequently, our costs
could increase substantially for storage and pumping facili-
ties. Further, the Village then may also have to make some
internal improvements within the system which would serve the
customers. It is estimated that in excess of $35,000 would be
required just for Greeley and Hansen for the additional studies
as outlined.
It is probable that the hydraulic studies needed would add anoth-
er estimated $15,000. The original Greeley and Hansen report of
January 1990 indicated that Chicago Suburban Water and Sewer
Systems has an accounted -for water loss of 15%. That is a sub-
stantial amount of loss and is a subject that would also have to
be addressed. The problem may be in the accuracy of their me-
ters, or in pipeline leakage. Either way, an accelerated pro-
gram, such as we are currently working on within our own system,
could cost us substantial dollars.
Up to this point, we have been addressing potential inadequacies
of the water system. When the water system is purchased, we
would also have to acquire the sewer system. There are at least
five separate sewage lift stations within the system. At least
two of those, according to the report, have inadequate capacity
and would have to be improved. Surcharging of sanitary sewers
is still prevalent within that franchised area. It is recommend-
ed, in the January 1990 Greeley and Hansen report, that a compre-
hensive review of all sanitary sewers and their capacity levels
be undertaken. Such review was beyond the scope of the original
Greeley and Hansen study, and an additional fee would have to be
negotiated to address those concerns. Further, at least one (or
more) of those lift stations accepts the flow of wastewater from
those residents in Prospect Heights outside of our corporate
limits. How that issue should be addressed is unknown at this
time.
Citizens Utility has finished their infiltration/inflow reduc-
tion program as mandated by the MWRD. A major improvement recom-
mended for acquisition of the water supply is adding a one mil-
lion -gallon elevated tank in the northeast section adjacent to
River Road. As this area is predominately residential, heavy
opposition from the neighborhood could be anticipated. It is
projected by Greeley and Hansen, in their January 1990 report,
that our minimum cost for purchase of the system► and adding
known improvements would be $20 million. This cost could esca-
late, depending upon the hydraulic analyses of the system, wheth-
er or not any water mains in the service area should be in-
creased in size or replaced due to deterioration, and whether or
not the sanitary sewer system needs major improvements.
I have talked to my counterpart in the -City of Des Plaines:
They have awarded a contract to Consoer, Townsend & Associates
to undertake a study on the feasibility of the City of Des
Plaines' purchasing the Waycinden Water Company, which is also
owned by Citizens Utility Company. This company supplies water
to approximately 536 customers within the corporate limits of
the City of Des Plaines, plus some factories and large complexes
such as United Airlines, either unincorporated or within the
corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect. Preliminary
indications are that these acquisition costs would fall in the
$5 million range. Comparing that cost, for 536 customers, to
the 7702 customers of the Chicago Suburban Water and Sewer Sys-
tems, you are looking at a substantial difference. Further, the
City of Des Plaines is still negotiating with JAWA for a connec-
tion point to the transmission line that feeds Mount Prospect.
The connection point could be in the vicinity of Golf Road and
Route 83 and would primarily be used for filling their new two
million -gallon elevated storage tank which, in turn, would serve
the majority of the customers within the Waycinden Water Company
area. Whether or not the Des Plaines draw on the JAWA feeder
main that serves Mount Prospect would impact an increased supply
if we were to obtain Chicago Suburban water and Sewer Systems is
an unknown factor at this time.
HLW/td
attach.
PUBUTIL/CITIZENS.ACQ
j l _ �a " •j/n FIGURE 1
C!*- WANKEE MRPM
Nam
54 p -
ALA 1 Y .
AW
! . '. tJe " • I J ,r- ^ '^"'..-„ �,. .r- 'ter.. �� _ ..
•St
23
ry,
9�
.... g!
# A �.
Lid
H ei*htffi
YQpprn AMP w MC bt}MAL A Cas iA sts `
*040
. saa CenCer i eaa . Rob Ray
Golf ClubUkA A10
twat wotaasj
o$h titer
r a �1
101 11 am
WA'P' �„
p,b.
reatawv' 7n. ..: 'ki.'Slj k" ,., i16'MI
4
.a •� • � Y j , � � ftl+lyJt /".i ""ti.. b -^TCM i .Y t• y 5' , ,
i
STUDY AREA LOCATION MAP
LEGEND:
AREA N0. 1
AREA N0. 2
AREA N0. 3
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
GREELEY AND HANSEN CITIZENS UTILITIES ACQUISITION STUDY
ENGINEERS JANUARY 1990
Emtb T
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORM41.MEMMUNDUM
CHF 90-119
CW&VInum
[��--1 ..6.
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: RONALD W. PAVLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICE AZZ 0 -61k -
SUBJECT: CRIME AND STATISTICS/TRUSTEE WATTENBERG
DATE: 27 JULY 90
My staff and I have prepared copies of examples of the media's
current polices on handling crime and statistics. Also, we have
attached a recent press release that the media may or may not use
for publication.
For the most part, the local media will print the major case ,
arrests, traffic arrests (D.U.I., etc.), and some of the major case
dispositions (see attached). However, unlike the example from a
newspaper provided by Trustee Wattenberg, the local press seems
reluctant to follow-up and report traffic and code violations. This
information would be best received from the courts' public records,
as the feedback to the Village is only in total monies collected.
The Police Department does provide statistics on an annual basis
shortly after the first of the calendar year through
P.I.M.S.,(Police Information Management Systems), and the trustees
receive these on a monthly and annual basis. In fact, our
statistics for the calendar year 1989 will probably be released by
the state this month. The Mayor and Board already received ours
last January.
Finally, the Police Department is always willing to talk about how
busy we are and how the community has supported us in our
Neighborhood watch efforts. Other than protecting certain
confidential and juvenile information, we have little control over
what and when the local papers publish relative to crime and
statistics.
RWP/mlb
Attachments
Mount Prospect Police Department
1 1 2 E. Northwest Highway Mount Prospect. Illinois 60056
Ronald W. Pavlock
Chief of Police
JULY 25, 1990
PRESS RELEASE
i�
* rLr
AN ACCREDITED AGENCY
Crime Prevention
(708) 870-5650
FAX: (708) 392-1070
ON JULY 19, 1990, CURTIS A. STOVER, M/W, AGE 37, OF
2002 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL, WAS FOUND GUILTY OF
BURGLARY BY JUDGE 'FRANCIS W. GLOWACKI, IN COOK COUNTY THIRD DISTRICT
COURT, LOCATED IN ROLLING MEADOWS, IL. STOVER WAS FOUND GUILTY OF
THE APRIL 23, 1988 BURGLARY OF THE INTERCOUNTY TITLE OFFICES LOCATED
AT 1753-1757 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD IN MOUNT PROSPECT. STOVER, WHO
PLEAD GUILTY TO THE BURGLARY CHARGE, WAS SENTENCED BY JUDGE GLOWACKI
TO TWO YEARS CONFINEMENT IN THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
JD/lb
CRIME PREVENTION CONSULTANTS
-------------
------------
Amw no &MdW LWMWWV C&W%Wt -
Manitowoc County-
Circuit
Court
A 24 -year-old Maullow
sentenced to four mo-tb:%MUaI:-=
woe County Jail for incest.
vehicle without the owner's consent
His total forfeiture was $120.
00
costs on each Of two worthless check
Charges. Her total forfeiture
Stanley L. Shelby,
Room 411, will serve - W S. 8th St.,
the sentence
July 25 in the Town of Newton,
Oestreich took and drove a Payloader
owned by Radandt and Sons
was $150.
She wrote worthless checks to Shop -
ko Of Manitowoc an April 27 MW May 2,
under ordinary confinement concur-
rently with a separate sentence he is
without
the Consent of George Radandt.
Mary J. Knapp, -
25, SU N.
amounts
In amounts of S51.39 and 31.02, respee.
already serving.
The charge stemmed from inci -
dents occurring in January, when
10th St-
A Manitowoc, was fined $W plus
court
court costs for Purchasing a schedule
V
Timothy & Lichte, 23, 2841 S. 23rd
St- Manitowoc, was fined $10 each
Plus court costs on three different
Shelby had sexual intercourse with a
female member of his family.
controlled substance without a pre-
scription. Her total forfeiture was
worthless check charges. ins total
forfeiture was 1158.He wrote worth-
A 20 -year-old Manitowoc man was
placed on probation for 18 months with
the' Wisconsin Department of Health
Knapp bought more than four
ounces of Guiatuss AC with codeine on
Jan.
less checks to Dr. Freud's Records
and Tapes of Manitowoc in the amount
Of W.32 on April 17, Shopka
and Social Services (WDHSS) for
theft.
Arthur
11.
Louise M. Valentine, 941 N. ft St.,
Manitowoc, was fined $25
in, the
amount Of $50 on Arand-Copps
p
Food Center in the amoil18 unt of SW on
P. Jennings. 8120 County
Trunk Q, must pay a $75 fine Plus court
plus court
April 27.
costs 4120), $34 in restitution and an
undetermined amount in attorneys,
fees as conditions of probation.
Jennings was found guilty ofpartici-
pating in the theft of gasoline from the
Tri -Par Service Station of Manitowoc.
Other charges against him were dis-
missed.
A 22 -year-old Plymouth man was
sentenced to one day in j" Plus court
costs for issuing a worthlessbeck.
Brian D. Senglaub, R. 3, must pay a
total Of 8117.56 in costs.
He issued a worthless cheek in the
City
ofl(lel on May 13 in the amount of
$25 to Dairy State Bank
Todd W. Felber, 25, 1114 & 20th St
Manitowoc. was fined $200 plus court
costs for obstructing an officer. His
total forfeiture was $34o. On April 9, he
obstructed officer Gary Sheahan of
the Two Rivers Police Department,
Fulton A. Jones Jr., 28 ills S. I
St., Manitowoc. was filed $100 plus
court costs for disorderly conduct. His
total forfeiture was s23o. On May 5, he
caused a disturbance at his residence
during an altercation with Rhonda
a
Randy A. Oestreich, 23, 912 N.
Rapids Rd., Manitowoc, was fined sm
Plus court costs for operating a motor
3
+ --^x� Rodriquez, 3hin, were each ,
Possession of cannabis and per,
Session of a h;ypadernuc Syringe.
odriquez was released after
posting $100; Oswald was re•
used on a $1,000 reeognizanr n
bold.
11thb A
incident reported
Mt311iNT PFtosp"Ecr _ A bur-
glary and a burglary attempt
lumber of suclr�a`nc degto nis rr�
ed during the past two ps re A
horse in the 1400 block of Ssmth
Busse Road repo
The burgianryrred
between
si
6:30 a.m. and 4 p4t Monday,po„
lice said. The door to the dome
was locked, but a window was
found unlocked the enact point of,
entry was not determined, ac
cording to police, About 3160 cash
stored in a bag in a kitchen
drawer was taken. AA attempt
was made to enter a home
300 block of Hawthorn, police 1
in the
said, but notding was taken. Sur.
gl rs lett $10o damage to a door,
but fled when the victim. at horns
at ids time, made noise to scare
away the offender.
%MtTeg
o L Prospect police arrested the foilowin s eXI
ptw.
ted chaxges,between Jute 13 and �l5, a it °°
l%CC
Ketth'DeWayne B%wex, 22, Of 422: W: L�,ako St, Apt B, Ad-',
dtson, drivMg with aIded
Jos P. Diaz, 25; -.tot X 7 license, no valid safetyRoad, ca.
�e3i11C19 warrant. ` r�gi14
61, Doheny, 24, of
ai vlDtttid of 520 6 WS Nl, ft• Pro iiCentC ois ddrx ovri�nrig.tt"
�a .
licee.
amelm Chialsva, ,
`
24, of 276 R w k "
lege, drivin with a'sus hcanse °•:Ellr Gmva Aril:'
Emilio- l uenex ! 3
, id t of
rl1070 Wheeling " lWado E*n,t ar
qtr . y Cor
Benito Montas,-33,.nf'521 Wimblatont,
, Ap
:' 'His., dnvitr with 8 pit
gg use, defective
lvliclxael E. Peipcabrink, 25, of 169 Crest °A,
Village, causing cxxrorinal damage `
r rDiane M Brandt, 21, 4f 1713 Forest Cove Drivd'�it
t retail theft , :
biuzarmy n Crowley,'21, ofi713 P t'Co
t Prosve Driver
pect, retail theft +
� Marcia L Ho 5
u Timoth E 17antels, 24, of 620 Palatine
' y lirnan, 25, of. l69 E.
ing under the 'inftum,cp tn4n,,,,w_5___ om Ave.. Wanlrtt ddv
Imauzu license. _,V ,
Marvin Cortez, 26, 6 '.l 105, W Cottonwood• Liana
bit„ Prospect, violation ofrestricted'driver's permit*
Sandra A, Nakanishi, 21, of S. See Grvun. bft
driving with a s G;
Msti L�. Doyle- 24;" of 1603 E x Apt. 225
: His., failum to yield, driving with a d 22ic Arlington '
pended re o snsppndad license, sea.
ow
Martin Rear n : 2fi of 1050 of ins
Pros Apt
pest, retail theft
Deborah L„ Bergqui
_ (rp S'� ttalE S: baa eSuha6en Mwifessp�+ � - SIF a ���
POL40,11
14
i; ocieuo pairs of �nhls std a suede shut, ' by a mate ming in ffit
7iseinf in -police " day, Jae 22 and 2 ism Y Bartywaatakcnintocustodyand valuedat rowafm werestolto the Cinnamon Ctt�
6 taten.6vm the Mount Prospect Ione 23 i r -Dwrr� Ktith Com. 25. of 2384 lata on #3,000 bond from the vehicle crystal
al Algonquin'
Police Department reports: An b" a � � ;' ��- Gannon Dr.. was arrested and to a rear cab window +� t�ysrad t Direct Sim
serestbypohoedonttax Y ? P charged with driving under the, t}he#eekis at 5400, 9:35am 11mrsday.
mean the is stuky ptrixx - a s influence of alcohol after he 1 RtaYYfui atltrY she was cutting thea
Only, a caul of jaw � make dud tiw rwr:ha � allegedly exited a parking east of ' Thieves stote property worth Filydble entry to hu pa
Thayer sad at 1.30 put. Busse Road across taro #1.320 from a residence in the 1500 busttxss ,
June 23. laws td uaftic w tum right into an black W mpster sometime A hone laud in the 1100 black he offrsder, tie
Ttle t UM MdO The value of the cert wli. �•� lot using of N. Meadow was burglarized black mak. standing
is estimated at #I00. I p�le8 between It a,m. and 3 Put, 3burs-
= Thaw stoolscassclic - a Sony AM(FM his Itutn shgrutd 12 37 a,m. T6tua day, Jug ?: sometime between &I5'antd 9:55 5 feet 10 items tall,
player fin a'1967 : � t auto ' , day. lune 21. Some
property stolen from the p m, wink the residents were out co s. and last seen
Chevrolet Camaro Sometime §t r', . Gold was also ehaiged withincidence includes a Spy csm dinner shirt and white pan
1.30 and 2.30 a.m. Faday s ldeo s a stereo vaheal at ' have and failure us a a 3S mm oasneta. iAkvcs took vi lied at a . exposed himself to t
between wine- t of #2,570 from the Lame asking a quesuo
22 whsle was pastaxi in tihp `#silo a iia 4=
betxecn 1I 30 p m. Fnday } ' t g a Mttsublshi stem Sys- t t• o x
110 black of " { Iur 23 : r #tt Ttiett
..Thc c miuc player, valhied at ='lu=22 9a ut r , tit
rn ' I 'b Into and two Minotta 35 mm ,b�
glean &A of the glove, wbik it waa parked m the IWO . 4141'. h A 1984 Nissan truck was
bur"
` the enc block of W. Coif Rd. Y `O 31, of 420 sometime between 2 and 8 e w a screen window bra- Vandals smashed
the vehicle 3 t ,g3amage estimned at W was. Radcliffe, Des Plsines, was Ill burglars and a of and punched the th
Damage to „ ' eaiigod to dw trim arrested and charged with retail a.m MattdaY• Iutrc 18 while it was, ken speakers
the r we p
t '' at#isofrtxna tt inthe""
1700bk�k�%vest crowd at
kicked mtsesn- 1982Pontiac Pirel
seat and a window. I a� window when thieves txtrth� their at 7.3{1 p m. Thtnulsy, June
between 3 cad.9 p
the GM Delco AMtFM sasaeru after she was allegedly d - "ivaudmg tw4a eashar Ione 2t while rte
7a ogm • d tails vat- �y , t Mali psa
r T wvth fr the Irking a%ad Jackets vatlirtd at #895.'s radar,
d v r A 3 mac 6000 ' bur ` tial #82 front 20 r c A" was verbally wowed
limina! damage to it142S. Rd ==
}sometinte between 7 and
8:45 Pm, Wednesday. Into 20 r e , s
while n was parked in a Randinnu AX0111k works mss' "" A rW
Mall poesto l 1ttt' 944 N., .. tan Stwtary xY wtah drrvhn toter
ethvemd"the door krwb and lack a>td g
fou butt hon
u(* pump house Incased in the 1300 irdiutnee ofnkvts took aft a poles '
carvalued at#150 . --v" block of W. Central Rd: had been afftctr-
a'`himm, off by an unknown CqA=vc tte2200 Nock of fi.Elmhurst Rd. '
1 ForClbte etltfjf t ` 't aomtri around 8 pm. allegedly ofakohol
,o --.-�.
I```1tto'condominium located .rhe'. June 23. `
his brendh. ' i
is Carl W. SmEIh. 4721f 7532 S,
1700 block of W. Crystal In. was Damage to rhe,putetip rhos e, .was with
Jctrghmued sometime between 650 !� #if ; t -driving under the influtaCe of a -
s.m, June 18 and 5 pm. =.'�'he t italtl auto t i bot fsidurc to yid when mak-
ay.'J 2whiletheownaw Ar 1412 {} i {lulsss aleft ton at 11.45 Ism.
+m a U* Friday. lone 22.
j- t#y valued $177th vlas `burglarized sometime between aaI* dt322
,tom a .1230 and 8.3Q a.ln• Jurx'Rtiffe l n.. Schaumburg, was
cable box with service control. a . whtk ii wsi parked in she 1000 _wrested w driving
compact disc player, a VCR.a Ism- block of N. Brentwood Ln: ' tinder the inductee Of of alcohol at
'ndle
'era.$600me"ay.+elryvalued The IVC is valuedat$212, 2:41 a.m. soniday. June 23war the
at # intersection of Golf and Robert
Dame w the ftwxit dos of the t toads. °'. :„ b
itailenceu at #l00 t#18tt : Batiy wad rho §� Arw .
-r tool my==.d, , hthievesOlt AUt* a red light aid no driver's -i
�3 Oldsmobile-,tYutdlt€a ti�me on
atP afE<a m affwer;'
Cflftflna! s1 1.9 'tO valoed#t"O.wxsswited , _ eatedlighta#thcoonorof
from the 1300 block of S Elmhund tv"Iamt t allegedly
Sal__ Golf . .ve
107 _y, " t Rd Ittoe. .25 ptoSlm-. tktiurdEatott.reS ,b' - � a,<_� 'xi: p r -
t r saf►td�txri�sl u
sen¢ervsitk `thea of a vciticle parlcad''the rod
'1U wresting oR It 11 7 Cd �r +u `i J ening
��
hen ,
NJ ed with
iv%ril= ;01
d"
0 uct
rly cl
own, who own homes on the lake,
...
the shols from the .177
�DESPIAINES'—&PVk'
rifle were landing, o
about 25 feet from their boat
Ridge man was arresWtu
charges of disorderly conduct af-
Draheim was released after Post*
ter he allegedly climbed onto the
& U.—the 200black of
ing $100 bond and has an Aug. 8
court date in Rolling Meadows.
M 1 0 .
North Ardmore and pounded on
windows. Thomas F. Garvey, 22. Cassette stem
of 110 Delphia, Park Ridge, was car
given an Aug., 7 court date in stolen from
PALATINE — An AM/FM cas-,
Motorist hurt after
stereo oday
Bette was stolen Mo
night from a convertible with its %
truck overturns
top down parked at Soccer City,''
546 & Consumer St., police said.` -
WHEELING —Aprospect
The stereo bad been pried from
Heights man whom truck over-
turned early Friday was in stable
the dashboard.,S
condition Tuesday night at
condition
Hospital in Park
Ridge. Timothy J. Henderick, 33,
from Neu -COMP
of 866 Blossom Lane, was critVcatty knlur�ed early Friday .
`.,.�� PALATING I —Four computers
lila truelc rotted over ha a ditch ...
near the 84th Aero Squadron Rer,
„valued at $6,000 have been stoles
tri the last year from Reo-Comp,'""
E.RelleuRoad. pollee said.
a8lkld Tho trssdr, a 1890 .Tine computers .were awes some-,
between July 4f dart
tce
rvrulet, struck. a grtard�'ail ar � tdm0 yea;„
1:11h adds of td� driveway t :orad Friday
oW rolled over and on
ger at(* police &a Forty
Tool box, tools
= guardrad was
five support posts were t,,,,,ffUSMg,ftom
garage
out and several base so
were damaged. An Minots Bell
—WHEELING —A red tool box
cable junction box also was dam-
"and worse Of tools and =ent
were stolen over the w
aged, but them were no estimatei,-,
of the damage. Henderick was , _
_,. from a garage in the $00 block of
charged with driving with a now
S. Milwaukee Ave-, police saki, A
pended license, driving an unin,
sured vehicle and several other
garage window was brokem No
value estimatetilere evailable.
movingviolations.
I 'C;ousession operator
Teen-ager charged.
',laces aces batteurge
vOth theft
_
lunch-time
BARTLETT — A
DES PLAINES — A 17 -year-
old girt who allegedly took som-
COROessift book operator was ar-
rested Mafter be ail tgeW
=tbeverofatruck y,
a, item of cloibing and a camera
from K mart, 1155 F. Halton::'
�,attacked
owned by a rival couctessue corM.
Ave., was arrested on charges of
patty. Police were called to a co*.
retail theft She was stopped by a
sirnction site at Fairfax Drive
security guard as she left the
and Armr Trad Road about com.
food
store and turned over to polic*�!
plaints feuding catering
services. A 23 -year-old Hinsdale
Man With gun ChMed
woman reported driving her
with conduct
UwA onto the site and being
yelled at, then pushed by, the
truck driver of a rival catering
Police Dennis
INVERNESS — A man who
com arrested
44, I"I Golden
was allegedly shooting at fisher-
4 of
men on an Inverness lake Sunday.
afternoon was arrested and
- Gate Drive, Addison on charges
of battery &W disorderly conduct,
cha with reckless conduct by
IkRobert W.
ft 8& e
=
Tr*I14 was released out $100
board pending a July 17
bo
Drabsim„court_
111,00f 240 Harrowpt*
hearing.
C I
oto dist Wed mi River Rive r Rog
Icy
^hkk
EtrrAN ^aCPp�� difey�a �ityr a ptr!!%pba��;
in
ii,#nwrrarrwrtt�r i�•#R' CWFI y'��° {ado
.... sad lout control of bis efe.
man died Tuesday "Hewitt and its motorcycle slid auto
night afbeae be loot coWW of his me- • 6* pavement and into the soutb» "
Garcyde acd slid Ruta an bcrsod lacks,,slidinag, baro a ,,,
'
can on Rives Road In Mont Prn*southbound cae:
pect Hew* was transported to taut► .
Geowal Hnsgaital in Parte Ridge
Police said Renard D, lfew4 K an
of 370 Island Drive, was riding his And war prononnrxxi dead on arrival
1980 Hart" Davidson ootor clln Tb* driver of tber,,saukhtaund csa
1 drib on: River Road, at about t35 was not "ed. A a
DEWAn
POLICE NOTEBOOK
SCOTCH
Cassette The and one
bedrnoom weansextensivelydaw,
BEUMTV
Ql
taken iX1 sire! the 1155 am. firn
�p� ��i4i
MOM PROSPWT —An t,'_VaWab smash t• r,.
AM/FM casoette stereo, valued, ,fir
liulll711
1. ukarr.
"a°° apt
at $700, was taken from a 1067 1:+A# .
Chevrolet Camaro parted in the ....��
1400 block of BrownaWaa Dart MOUNT Priosm T — A
was smasbed and locks
week. : - moon roof
out of a 1982 Pontiac
^ that was parked in tbe.
RED WINES Z
lot of Randhurst Mail last week.
Sappdt .,
i b�m Ill x i Y Police said the damaged was astl '
(Australia) ....
r mated at $2� �a � ,''
ACUi
DES PLS — A tire smol-
dared for at least 30 minutes in +
dered Step et uafi rzer,
. a1",'4
the basement of a boom at 1830 »
f mll
No IImp 1
Pine Sl before ap to a Stolen Cat
main story bedroom late Weems- '
C,iOCi ill C
day morning, firetighters said MOUNT PR0.SPEZ,I' -- A car
i $
(AlexVow .
The cense of ebe flus baa not been stereo and equalizer, valued at ,^
wwqm(Spam)09 F
determined but it was burning for. $$00, were taken from a car
at least 30 minutes before a real parked in the 1800 block of W t
.
dentin the b noticed Una Gcif Road Saturday.
SEBAI
'
� COul
LOM"
&
2-8-3: the numtwrr in 5-10-13-25-26: little
winning
2.5.2.9: the_winning Pict 123 million: Low WApot
r.
Pour number. fora single
y ,
n
c
to owner Willis
Man acc`l sed of
MAIL Rhonda L Dower, 20, of
He baa 30 days t,
Arado admov,
`. ' 011 bus
37" b, told police sbe
took the tapes dmriu0 the past
abut he will` wo
: psst, to rnaintair
facer weeks while she was an enr
said the eager to
DES PI"AINEs — A Chicago,
of the stare, police said.
"< proviang the Haig
man arrested Sunday after
medty
was released post-
after
track of Is
°Ise all eapueed himself is a
.� � gY band and given July 11
n
woman on a boa and tinea lnrrrped
out the window of the bus trying ,
" cm date ha Rollfa $ !Idea
,. police said; 9
f,, Wa in
w, sniid. "M o
to steal her Wallace P"�
s
x 27,of5730$W
e
have to toghie
K
was charged withare
attempted
battery and
.
over weekend trend
, cut
want to live then
. Po
police toted hies walking`
t' A major �i
northbound on River Toad, palins
Said
MOUNT PROSPECT — A car
valued at 1,000eras stolon over
-Kaufman agreea
c And both owners
the weekend from the 1300tdOck
1W.,tbe area, receive
B U
of South The
for �g "re<
"I trofing the grc
"
$1,1100111 items
ownex told n o one else had
-- kegsto�wear,{a, lincutlasssu�r
is la's namye.,s,, ,
w
MOUNT PROSPECT — The
�
and that he was up to data'Z: Mr
aur his payments
"R"it+ ��
fi.' '!A. out those
.�. 1"6e
t
frost door of a borne in the 1700
- block of West was pried'
; X i >
erhSaid
anCe polio" it
open to gain entry last week. Po-
lice said several items, including
at }l
, + A
iniken M'
ken they spot it
But it was der
it waSunday
a Vt cwph and
"
lut
Hammer
jewelry, were taken. Polios esti-
mate the value of the
DES PLAINES — Two osteo '. � �
parked in the lot at fQipper
said
about an ineider
itemat $1,100.
ScLool,1101 E; Gregory, were �
about 7 p.m Ab
fighting, some
into Sunda Y
y ed`."lkesaid AnAAf/1aM
t � had been
Y Officersf
�1
player �h $175 and a radar deal ,
: 9rn Ar
"
WI S � as S
factor worth $W were at* an ,.. ,
�, from a 15151 tet � :� �
� , � knife, rested �&
MOUNT PROSPECT -- A Des
The radio also was from
'We still do n
Plaines woman was charged with
',tbeotbercara 150 Ryundal Es
"oei.
- Rammer said. "G
retail theft after she allegedly
. took 21 cassette tapes from
. A slim-jim device apparently.''
was used to enter both cars, pn»
an offender, but r.
At
.0 Renard World lac., Rattilmrst
.liceraid
7:45 p ra , a
Ing up the first L
"..!,.Out
in another ar
r with between 100
volved, Hammer
were CAD
w` {/
+�� ■
�mr�eAls
. ., ' •Heights, Elk.G
Palatine, and ar
the winning number in
were pelted with8.2-3:
9.22s Little Lotto ' .."The situation
Monday'sdally * Y
M,y, „control,"" 1lamrne.
M
71iffiamLotto
When the dust i
-6—;7-1: the wine ng Pick ' '
number.
pie were arrestsPour
fwith disorderly
drunkenness .,sw
y ,
n
11 NUO
`v IP, 4 .^.•ooft *
' VIA � POW *" am rod ,' �fi' °� .
ea ; rte Pah00 4"
Paha �
ow UK m do m► � POT�' � � Grp "
O "l,` O'tl'MDA Paw 'Xs*r NFr�u . i r.
:a IOU PIPPeg Jvq 934mm (4 PO4
g�� PcAOM
wp PO
agaa°aeei PMei t100`Ot= cr3 taQt� i� dmqmw
aapi at, p�tp an Pf" aagpgdloomm,"
agp!q C mCae► Pp
aq " SIL `. eq Panlnaal dppa8ve eB l�► 4x `
anawti"rdoq ;a pap ed a j"D twat ypr +e9ayea a
rq .y 40 Lau atieaaaaea
sat i apa aaaau4q xa; raq rasa; 6aaaw au wm 0" Co � � Pa�ttq � • ae�a Y
as �ra+euoa*raw
+! ` Y.
Papitim +�qea
T i3aP► jai qii�
iead�aar ate'IRJV X"t'par � � xa; paupue aq �s .
`�•. r F
a (r atgpd
fmax
wK.
1 ,. ,. '......,
v'dklt
10 4w
!N ZL3d gatP
..t" ea i u a« R
p" � r', r M1 i0 idlw►P�"Y 6 ppiy a
`Pa i M i. ltd,1.N! ow
t aaa d Ot it
m Peg 04
J�� ^ 'Oe'd 9 ie 7iat �ti PPS ,y�� �S iliE► .. "
as a Sau aqy wfi..�
i Ypo
o Opti aapi 4Tp aq pl ltp; 'gyp ;
i '8ppt""a; $,R'.i �t P t see► tiOS`t! « .:: r, ,* e
ese[ te"Pai P aapr&e i 'aaadptata pmt k "�P a 1pooq 00tj .;
nL!Swd put mwvd a , _ d30ttd Pt r "e"' 1w *tt Pari► wM aPe"!i on e
P
°e Ivyi[�►M�it111" /j..ry� Zy���yp�ey►TNM�e�11y�p�}ryy
ils
Pat
y M�,71
e` F QeaB mlaeuwY am An <
It:d[nPa PWq W*ItIt perm
"A apt ITWW am 4% ,oi P44 its Am 0" irppa m�ru
Ogo ,G"ri.� bpd waft a papam,,r,
� aqi Pf , �'Mtad � .L'1Ct�1`aatilta .t.arnruaar
M I *,alit `IV-'
CC) V`cI -�4 fq h'1 1 9 (b
="z
P
State Po
lice recoMrered a 3494"i
„. gedly took a 497 Ford.
Jeep Wrangler'Friday ort%4% "4irndr tt� glot of the Wbta,
where it had been dtwandoded,"'t{-1%n,12$ M Lake St., wbile
near Joliet Road after being t was inside shopping Saint
volved in an accident, ponce sg* ` day momWg is beidg bold
The $15,500 car was taken o?�` —'I" µ t police on theft g�
night Thursday from the asmaitiitg a bfoatday drorning bond *„
lot of Remington A... � �' h�r� � F��tatespstlice �s
180H+4tstTree rr"'rw+NM"Vp 'f},at',`rid
` 21; df 4542 f'eaidtt Si„ Cbicag
tthe rwmp
of rringtad Road and, 1, y0 whom om be „ilegedly rent driv *
Witha" < hull t stop ear and returned
., w tQ^�e�^ti�4c'd`!�'t+l4a^M,kYWE�G„'
ELK GRoVE'VUA AG4"$C`'
Village lawnmower ft df Phranw Uf.ammgge
day moving
was rbcrty
pall ,e, - ikttempt
�.
theft. The la%ft "s , . k{ r•
unattended for minute °; °'.•t '
od village propertyat-llerg civ frARR Abusnt
Road and Anders DrfvitWbitisiNNt ° t id damage was done to a W
village emplogee uaittg tate lawdr, ateg coltmarn of a 1490 Pontiac
Cads
Am when at -
mower returned to wtrete if h to steal it early Saturday -
from the parking int at
lice found the la �" 2820 tllendale.Teracc The
and ae rested the rctaas they, al•. "
legedly found with it Re 140 W' heard the hofn•horddttg ands
then found the car had been bot^
Fontepineda, 46,0( 4800 Wrighr wised and the edging was run` 1
wood, Chicago, was charged with police said. engine
were tat
theft. His initial court appear.„adce ° UW&
is cheduled fait 3uty 211 err -, of for* petry"»
w °?.;
TTUR CAPS M SING ` about 9:35 am. w
°p
sonsannewhisde'T+ROM AC1TOMORTT $ "
.
I— hued caps valued at$150
PAGE 2A• E JOURNAL, YYEDN E9DAY, JUNE 27, tam','
_.,.
MOON ROOF;
LICE,`BLOt,L���
"
4 tly
20 at 999 N. Shahinal in ML
ftovecL
�e PIp
yu.o.
" ^■■■�y��, ^■■■may/��� f'^�,' "■� /may,,^
Player,
TIPS toi1ovriahg
STT?REOSTOLEN
"'` FROM VEPIICLE
'�'�"� "
♦ e� .r M +�F�.IAL, �+^w!"tole
S
TIPS intormataprh
was obaAihrad fratm Aha thea of
�yp�e,
:",11Yi�.
in,(an&In 5254
8 at i 108 "item tee cl s wApP doles fanh the
tussdenceof Ja tiiaar
the ML Praapea Pada •tj:'.
T nt Joaartmi paftsfea Poihre
Bi61Lar` N omits Wadaeada "
r
of a ML - overw
, �Tt , mi window rose elm dokna an 4 �t 1lavid S rpt Thayer a
thevNacle(Miehelel : of Sys au a op
'PROPERTY MISSING "'� � .Land rvhiia tea
aodFrida tditl
r
R ot1723Tuaan e, Vale Cl rose ;
FROM BACK YARD C' whilethe Cove June 23 or 2A At 1333 Nt
°n
Arodtgaadtdlsdpiaya,
A cardboard Elul carttalpingg Cava, An equalizer was -� ' rs +Ori
domttact discs a ud
tom„ a camas, a cable con-
Asserted aetews and bolts valued other bma k auto"an have the duringaw, 000
at $264 was swien Jona 20 TSB $ KNO8 TTAM AGED Two lima
trot bos wiaf ratwm conaospect
rol,
}au a1ty. $644 east and $40 in
cents were SWIM during bur
or21 m
fomthebackya ssA085,pine CRANTEN'NAE, OAlecke,23
in ML $Jm� MTSSTNG FROM CAR ' Bu h L,apa,,
a -
banvxn Duna 18 sari 22 m
Tbornas .53 ,' and wa used w b�srma�Or
and of" A &W
e AcW=Mbandaommmewtath
T'��r,vAbxdst$1,134
net incl
de OO in baa drlvdr
WOMANLIEPORTS $100 was stoke Jona 2a :. MY Dist ati334win elan
g the money, was
datsdxt at1747W.Cq$WLamy,
Apt• 642, the John
, WrCive-amwitilen
, �r
TNOECENT fromtkacarofanAdingwnllts, Road in ML
URE residues, Rath A. Swne, $0 art &boot52;5ft °8 • wr r.:.,C
°ML 1520 C IL while dvs
of
1V Th4lown,Sb»The hentdoor
was
A 21 -year-old atw
wpmatatnldpol6aasbsaaw� aFPvlasda ta999N.E1mitmstio °, STERtitIMTSSTlnlG � A window
m
JoW OPen to obtain eery;
wtba
with his peaq and ,FROMAUTOINDRILE L fegaboup530
tiasaaotaM
�h
the Sanest Edon art Oak Tn+adt
opmmiulo tn"
8 as txswhala.; STTGtEOMTSSTNG 5omanon
94 was °"�°ng am bar red.".- PROM YEI ICT E An IaM/PM Santo wldhaltyt. }' trees
Jwmd iaar valatdd
,
,,daaaco 21. S at $8410 was assist i ssi
The woman was wa0dut har-"Amrie;w .t. ..«, ., s22at2 inML �S�r s.�A.
TTUR CAPS M SING ` about 9:35 am. w
°p
sonsannewhisde'T+ROM AC1TOMORTT $ "
.
I— hued caps valued at$150
t ma
blockofAl8agm
were skalen from the car of a
wilingMa rws residues, lar»
MOON ROOF;
o Lralak,58, ed230717ovd
SIL-whilehiscarwasparindjune
:,ON,AUTOM
Amotmnoofwaa
20 at 999 N. Shahinal in ML
ftovecL
der door lacks in
� . i8 w the v rile of STtawe Mao
2 Stem here, arra. .a
player. a a double
coulpact +gap
STT?REOSTOLEN
"'` FROM VEPIICLE
car of A ML �i
c
'
Au AMJ1"lq $tares
While the am was ?
N Elmhrrra .
1p Ay valu04 41 $700 was swim
LEATHER .JA
residrni loam A ML
MLSSING P'ROO
-°<wa
1700 1 -Tine
which had been, .4mangs,
r 20, was laden
the vehicle - of Jame
LD -re;wlsuiewabi;l9 oflfplN Brat
0AW Lona, while the car WAX»' STOj
TIO
IInd m. 7"N., -way. � K Asargs
T A door window sial a oar seat
dama n were o kit h� wide about $154
Two kettra I a radar
dcaocaax, a orator -20 , two
�.8oftlm49ABJamifaL
jAp. 142, while ba vehicle
parrs Ofsla,:ksandaSwedebtw,.,.'
debt vtolen Ata weal of 51,195 ' �•
a»,prdntd at 1492 Brownstone, ..
waac stolen from rho trade of a
ML �t rmsiddnL .. .
"-
-
2 CAMERAS
STOLEN IN BURGLARY
The driver's window axe °day
' met 4ab window, were atm bro.
kao, cawed 5400 damagd lama
T'aw 35-mitheseact
� . i8 w the v rile of STtawe Mao
2 Stem here, arra. .a
player. a a double
coulpact +gap
: of 1713 °Pormt Cove
m
307, weds 3t was
.
7"Plitya and
valued at $2 roam moles
peaked ser Ira
'
+r8 a buag.say Jnna 19 n 11nJq ,
ProoliM
CASSETTETAPE,S
, ; STOLEN FROM ATJT O
A window
broken souse ^ °° `
_-_, �
A casectin Setae with 30 tapes,
vaiuedat5344wssswled„ioakti9
M
M
to S ML Prospota'•'ws sons sus h. ..
m V. Avelloracdc, HANSEN
3110114 R04 A
a Joe: 23 Sar%>irM�i/IY'
1 19ulawib,q: ,,/
TOM VEHICLE a,
vahadd .it $200 iM •,.
M
AY
Police .l�'"ake Several
Arrests
Mr. ProspCCt police arrested thc'followin
CIS, Caiaut(Amelia)TurnerofCoumnysidkand tiCald. charges between June 20 and 23, accordinppool l oI the listed
(Patricia) Turner g tcerofFlorida. rDarrell Keith. of 2344, Cannon DriVk. APL 302 Mt
HC was preceded in death by a son, Andrew M. Prosppect,mP henrequirnd,dniving
rla,neusage,failu etosignaJw
Turner 1J1; three brothers—Lee (Dolores), Anthonyunder the i
and Louis Turner, and one grandchild. Stella W. O'Donnell. 31, of 420 Radcliffe, Des P
Funeral services were held MondaJune 25 at Daniel J. McKillip, 22, oft S Man Drive, Mt � , retail theft,
Leiter
Oehler Funeral Hom'e',Arlin ton a su"rided license: - .. t, do ving with
Hes. , �g & Okg. William Slade Kro
Interment was in Mt. Carmel Cemetery,pee. 27,6f 1068 , Chicago, warrant C
In r �t lrl bond.
appreciated the American CanCcaakty� Steven g. xork, 26, of Sat! 1408, S. T te. bond
Contributions to
See %toad,
a, t
a revoked licease, 8 :.e.. ..:,. . driving yy ih
SALLY M. P`RO'l?ENZANO , �� Da g with a . of 1225 N �s�wood 1�vkMt
n , uspettded licenu� failure to'3 w �p
Sally M« Provenzano, 56, of Ternof
�P�y of retail theft ..
theft n �rInstIlmnot � Arlington HM , pu, re
formerly of Des Plaines ando0datoCS 111 49t of 1t1M3
. June 19 at Desert S died vie, » 2C, Gkatvrow. retail
Jerome 'Talky,
"'•"'"'°! u 31. of 4644 W. .
She was bom Feb. 22,1934 in t 8 violation of bail bond...31,
in Des for 18 , east! lived Lrr�3S *. .
zOnLSlee as a Ckxlt Mark movinAlbensong to Ari• theft. Grego..... of 1216 N. Nor*wasr Highway, Park
a int, in
A- Penny. 21i of 4213 Hickory ffilb
She is survived ltw6f driving wadi a fiadgng to show Dave, Watr#acgan
abatA. Jaaahac 'S five . Jay T. 8329 West, Lansing,Wft
lames A. (Joanne) and Wiliam A. � Control signal, driving with a r�1 l omse,�8 a
ofMt- « A.(Bridg ) DiatiaS.Flnriti,40,of1986W«Al a
Of Woodstock; andAnthonyJ, (Stacey) three warrants C g violation Of bail bond.C12,
of Km ,Okla , a daughter, Cynthia J. (Steve) g ,lof99 W. Algonquin Road, ML PMVW4
Spe ter of Streamwood, 11 grandchildren- herr Carl W. Smith., 42, of license.
.
mother, felyn Saelkns, a sister, Linda (Walter) . inflna failure to .driving
Pennsylvania.and brothesr, William Fultz) yield white nirnin1� left
David James Hairy, 28, of 1322 la9Ck under Lk
Thef , wassaidSaturday,Juuae2310,.drivingunderthe' �?• ,
a.m. at St. 's Catholic Church Des Plairiaau . Proper lane Vie' a.red
tight, aci driver`s � on
lntaxnent was in Mt Carmel Cera L �.2G, of M68 Whitcomb. Des Plantes, retail theft,
Oehler Funeral Home, Dies Plaines �"• HilLaidk = "' Joel O. Moran, 26, of 88'91 Cum.
tatutements.«' ` . influence driving with a revokedbulandNiles, driving under the
I'll_... _ in=surance. inpropw lane ussm ,-' v.. • Oil urp ,to shave pmotot
l��t�� �tao
h
vimt1raiumcirec _ NUTS LKFT r H 1747 --Sc oi, Saw; K be=
was %U tht lies of The ` ' miS`2A `ON SCRATCHED PICK-UP >'i.mie, told poi'lice Jure 14 he lose AMe 9
'- 1. ,° wallet, which contained 5350
the Mex SomconeftaaWheel =his_
The po , ' "Pal LADDER STt?LEN ing spick tat�lcwh h '' c ,creditcardsatkitn �,`kfMfiifiLETELEPHflNE
is hoMh R ' ' 1 4M POUL was left with stboct damage a MISSING FROM CAR
�� i`t; � 1 , -`T' #;T: },.' 3-. + p'' # :A'�letilewS4SGraiCited # ie while -9
, Setif god .4 , at995 N. Elmhtast int ML `YCR STOLEl A tel: YBi at
A tint was 'valued at $250 waS be- °: a_FROMSCHUDL S250 was stolen June,12 or t3
apparently lird6en June 16 by . = May 14 and June 15 frtri - `The anthem of the notC - r`oxn the car of a tuft. Prospect
firework -- bly an M-80 ` the back yard o i WPmsped t_�ntly did not,like the way the A portable' vi # ttc re = resident, P. Conlon, S2, of i
taped m w ` at a i►it � �' vehicle was parked, but Linda corder luedat was len _=1107 Eleven, while the vehictr
Prospectmitwoce .7= a The laddcr, designed for in . Slome, 37, of 835A Valley _ t t6 atPros ctt gh ;° : was parked in his civeway. _.
The fuse was lit aid the firew .mound pooil, was missing `Stream,ehie irwaythenoteupon
works left a h -sn the picture at funding it, and did not discover7,
window at IOLaw, theenco nlocir W ani ett Row i tthedaniagetothe
michaa aur
t V � L n { i�
•$�74 ,#zr ei ifilCl`I:iDAMACsirD :.' a
y ., sf II+ ,CAR`WASIi IELDBROKEN �#
aY
r-VCRSTOL�t . r .. ; ` ONAiftl`UMOBILE = if
`.
-�, NO.—
y kft with about $`,Tbewindshield ca the c of a '
A videocasseti F000rder vat- 1. damaitewheathemarwindawof ' 14it Prospect residem Monne A July 30 cautdate was set for an Arlington Hts. main ,
-tied at $350 iutd Si in w Joy IS - Skupien, , of 321 N. Wille St„ �# }�i� a`eluee car i nt that %fe sue people—rnclt�ung two
e , J 16 a_ wri=, `was bili, about 5200! inn Mt " t, a police said
burglary aMt at Me Shell. -' e7i 1 t tfhitlertwas_ = h in*qYum IlaoddeitatRa6dRoWjuauthofKdismg-,
Q
'q1?98 S. F.linhurs�t Ro3
:raiz - _Ao x ` •.
door din mi
scratch wits � Wsa
)n ti ecarofa W Psa&-;
leant. Margaret M..Saw-
t?f �l WaPela,ctiusing ,'
)0 June l0while
v4',62, oU4104 _ S _,' elm vehicle was parked ai at 994
..causing About $200 data N Elmhurst in Mt. '
P Spt<ct '
whet, the t tali light w
'as';
JemG 37 vhi elmauto; }_r- _ _ 1 REAR S
i's car, whichin win ran into a car
30. of 942 N Law. Wheet
i and Munoz were aupped fora red li;
trywasteleasedon 10%of$2,000bo ac
wing under the influence, following u
,',.,, s -t . � ���� s ��� ��y � f {'S?4a v -'+a"{ .+mss <• �', -44fWDAXJUNE 2Z I FF;
4 et r� ex
Stwen,,.,At
( ,
i7 VAA 1-�7ltRE�-
_- ands � an --'i way Jew -17 1$ a Mt. Peon- , - iN1`U GAS TANK
}- s . t ' SIfiiN ST(?L�'i employee Prot resider. .
A]ftES1AUA,ANi`the right hand ! The left�wheflcoverwas � o€aMt
was obtained €rnm fief filers � �€r� ' {; •; F � 4$y; � r'6n � ES- off.theriglu eeldweper rant policehe
- flu Mt. Policf� Y x c tiiTedtOy bent rep. thf radio afl'
The pui�shes _ S12ti0 � bee tes�t*was�l the right €timer eirep
Blotter" iaboth et8 W June 13. ib Jake s $71 a month but suety wanted to ink tl €uel fank h� ae toereo
twom a(} a eruxitb. She allegedttY tnetside mirnx the ilea car Jef t bile June t7..
F`r'iday f titiQ>}4.- p 2q.of filand.. {may g Gu=.27.of 603 { . • Mk. resit John V:
`pezzsat302W.Nt>rthwestiltgh� {luiig�latD isBell. Ave. i1 lcover a Archiszewse a
pile of
va%atdWT . way � Mt - jokes l_akce � € :
®r Compute i%6 wis �h the
was dur - - - sugar> the vehte near
t�YINDUW BRUKEN €eat tank while itwas parked at
aux 11 of 37 theeast t -
J 16c�r 17 attl ttorf=side the ; " WIiEES 1Vi1SSiNG Renauiet, ` i234 N.
p F12(iiM YEIiiCLB f fi T A W SC
B�
' . 'lime way no sign o€ forced ., + °
River Road.
} entry' at the, Mt. '-'SC - . � Policf were able to fin
Dist. 15ttti S. RATCBES WOMAN raised _ A 11/2 -by -3112 -€off wi�vi � at the
Edison cW- to o w on the west sem o€ the Fairview, gem
Elmhurst Road, was a tiara .. were messing titan a truck , Mi -
were upset abut her pay Ex VtALLEGEflLY-
Pro',
4cr and modem Prospect,plan tun over tire -counter at= _ at3oeMitchenBuickiaMLFrits=t Scl was . 3t broken k J 17 or PAC ING '
t missing Thetiiiefmig tl vettsed the Wstity-sol at201 N.Ardmm . p taken
vehicle had been in lE
., a key to get tritti theAML resident told
on trade June l�t�ttxtothet�€t, lielas ex-wife pawned a ring
which
occurred
Jae 16 i7 owns which is wt�nli about
• > the � at 801 R -. TEDDY REAR
#y/ f+�q`{ RandRoa&Tree Yehieks was left
STOP FROM PciRCii
$5,0t� rt ceeetly.
� S F ' ' t,.+•+f tb F -� � .i.:.. _< ' i2! a - i�M liW s�Qrrie {}. .�
Kikca
_ iS7Nl V
f , tandat- x'1713. tV tcuea, the
}) §` ., T_- gjyy ofBrsttS.Pep,37.1%>
'aa�.-- t t €riirYpw-�ha
C77.
g - T' :- • pdrk Dist. !
Zeev>' cmtureeutity centear june,l$ at�d a tcs te��3
af�,starting the IC&them. a police report saed.._: -
:IU2, -year-gldFranklinPWtiasnt'Ct Wacnt"gol€cm
'kxat0dat60t1S.SeeGjqo4at4.44a.m:when �f
imoccm
J€c sawak dbyftreandsmokurg urs tl t
n�rettl kihiaf3 startise ftOmft
it, Wem : ,.
.� wstr moi`the lied-
100
r Mss J 17. , found a ce"td of
xwn slip a€ur
xBUAMAC at ingtherbegmissing.AChi-
of o pawn alleged y
`thy was t ad
A i' le€fw tt S � 13ibeLaena, {� .. v s s the
whileparked in anvc�.K Marg
it"Ir a—
eOU m Ad
Village of "" Mount Prospect
Mou6frllrospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: NANCY MORGAN, HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: AUGUST 8, 1990
SUBJECT: DISCOUNT TAXI PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE PLANS
In the past few years, this division has received an increasing
number of complaints regarding the discount taxicab program and the
companies involved. Many of the complaints are just a casual
mention when the senior comes into the Center. However, whether
a casual mention or a formal complaint, always mentioned is the
rudeness of the driver, the long waits, no shows or general poor
service. The drivers complain about having to subsidize the
participants income. I believe that without a change, these
problems will continue to grow. In previous surveys conducted by
the Division, numerous participants have stated they were willing
to pay more for better service.
Our present program allows participants to ride anywhere within the
Village limits for $1.00 with a $1.50 subsidy by the Village,
regardless of the meter rate. This compensates the driver $2.50
per ride. However, the average metered rate ride is $4.26 so the
drivers are presently losing $1.76 per ride. This loss totals
$7,128 per year for the cab companies. The inequities and built-
in problems are obvious. I feel the program needs to be based on
a metered rate system as opposed to the present day flat rate
system. This type of program change would induce good service for
our discount program participants because all users fares will be
based on the same metered rate.
After carefully considering a full range of participants, Village
and driver needs, ten possible alternative plans were developed.
Of these alternatives, I recommend the V8 plan - sixty per cent/
forty per cent split by the participant and Village with a $3.00
Village subsidy cap per ride. Few rides taken by participants are
over $7.50, so the majority of rides would receive the full forty
per cent Village subsidy. This $3.00 cap stipulation prevents the
excessively long rides for instance to Chicago or O'Hare. The V8
plan will improve service coverage by eliminating restrictive
boundaries.
During the week of July 30, 1990, Janet Abernethy, Assistant Human
Services Administrator, conducted a phone survey of ten per cent
(sixty) of the number of monthly riders who have the discount taxi
cab program card. These people consisted of frequent users of the
program, past participants of the program, and people who have
never used the program. She called Senior Advisory Council
members, Senior Center participants, and people who never come in
to the Center. The findings were quite conclusive. Of those
surveyed, eighty-three per cent or fifty people were in complete
agreement with the proposed forty/sixty co -payment on the metered
fare system. They, also, were in favor of the program going
outside of Mount Prospect. Ninety-five per cent or fifty-seven of
the survey participants felt that a change of some kind was needed
to the present program.
A great deal of thought, consideration and effort has gone into
this proposed change. I believe this is the best for the Village,
the Senior Citizens and the taxi companies. This change will cause
a minimal cost increase for the Village, a reasonable cost increase
for the users which the Seniors have bought into, and the taxi
drivers like it for they will no longer be subsidizing the program.
In the past five years, the ridership of this valuable program has
steadily declined from over 13,000 to less than 8,000. Although
it is possible that with this change we may temporarily lose a few
riders, I believe we will gain quite a few more riders that have
dropped out of the program due to the documented complaints.
PLAN
PSHARE
IERID
F SHARE
PER RIDE
AVE V PAYS
PER RIDE*
AVE P PAYS
PER RIDE*
TOTAL V PAYS
CAB CO. LOSS
OR GAIN
CURR N�
$1.50
$1.00
$1.50
$1,77
$10,800
-S7,178
V1
2.25
2.25
1.95
2.65
14-063
+ 2,415
V2
2.09
2.00
1,72
2.63
12,375
+ 578
V3
2.00
METER -S2.od
1.56
2-70
. ......... . 11,259
0
V4
1,50
METER -,S,1.5C
1.72
2.55
12.375
V5-
251% OF
METER
75% OF
METER
1.20
3.07
-.8-627
0
V6-
25% OF
METER
75% OF
METER
.1.07
3.19
7,712
0
V7 _
33 % OF
METER
66 % OF
METE
-R
1.41
2.85
10.171
0
V8^
40% OF
METER
60% OF
METER
1.71
2.56
12.282
0
VqA
40% OF
METER
60% OF
METER
1.65
2,61
11,892
0
V19 I
50% OF
METER I
50% OF
METER
1.99
. . ......... . 2.27
14,348
Q
Because of certain restrictions placed on a number of the plans these
amounts may differ from the stated share.
- These plans differ from one another in that V5 pays $3 to any hospital.
These plans differ from one another in that V8 pays a maximum of $3.00 for
any one ride, V9 pays a maximum of $4.
Village of ' fount Prospect
Mouk"Pros pect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: NANCY MORGAN, HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JANET ABERNETHY, ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: AUGUST 2, 1990
SUBJECT: DISCOUNT TAXI PROGRAM PHONE SURVEY
I contacted ten per cent of the number of monthly riders who have
the discount taxi cab program card. These people consisted of
frequent users of the program, past participants of the program,
and people who have never used the program. I called Senior
Advisory Council members, Senior Center participants, and people
who never come in to the Center.
The findings were quite conclusive. Of those surveyed, eighty-
three per cent or fifty people were in complete agreement with the
proposed 40/60 co -payment on the metered fare system. They, also,
were in favor of the program going outside of Mount Prospect.
Ninety-five per cent or fifty-seven of the survey participants felt
that a change of some kind was needed, and five per cent or three
individuals were against any change to the present program.
11.1136 BUSINESSES 11.1136
Sec. 11.1136. Senior Citizen/Handicapped Subsidized Taxicab Rate Program.
A. hates to be charged persons sixty five (65) years of age or older and handicapped
persons shall be as follows:
1. A flat rate of two dollars fifty cents ($2.50) shall be charged by taxicabs licensed
in the Village to such persons for transportation within the corporate limits of the
Village; one dollar ($1.00) thereof to be charged directly to the person and the re-
maining one dollar fifty cents ($1.50) to be billed to and paid by the Village.
2. For transportation of such person to or from Northwest Community Hospital,
a flat rate of three dollars fifty cents ($3.50) shall be charged; two dollars fifteen
cents ($2.15) to be charged directly to the person and the remaining one dollar thir-
ty five cents ($1.35) to be billed to and paid by the Village.
3. For transportation of such person to or from Holy Family Hospital, a flat rate
of three dollars ($3.00) shall be charged; one dollar sixty five cents ($1.65) to be
charged directly to the person and -the remaining one dollarthirtyfive cents ($1.35)
to be billed and paid by the Village.
4. When more, than one senior citizen and/or handicapped person is transported
to the same destination, then each additional person shall be required to pay ten
cents ($0.10) in addition to the established flat rate.
B. Persons eligible for the rates set forth in paragraph A of this Section must apply
for and obtain an identification card issued by the Village. The Human Services
Division of the Village shall establish the standards and procedures for the issuance
of such cards.
C. No taxicab company shall require that a prospective passenger identify, prior to pick
up of said passenger, if he is a senior citizen or handicapped person as defined in
this Section.
D. No taxicab company, owner or operator of a taxicab shall refuse to convey any
orderly senior citizen or handicapped person holding a valid identification card issued
by the Village.
E. Those taxicab owners or drivers of taxicabs licensed by die Village shall bill the Village
on a weekly basis for the Village's share of such senior citizen/handicapped sub-
sidized taxicab rate program, provided the following procedures have been met:
1. That the senior citizen/handicapped person has presented their identification card
issued by the Village at the inception of the taxicab ride.
2. The driver shall present a "passenger ticket" to the senior citizen or handicapped
person being transported for their signature and identification card number.
3. That said "passenger tickets" shall be forwarded to the Village for payment on
a weekly basis. (Ord. 3774, 4-21-87)
597
DRAFT 4 - (8/09/90)
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT,
THE MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT, JtXD THE
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS PARK DISTRICT FOR THE
RECREATIONAL USE OF WATER RECLAMATION
DISTRICT RETENTION RESERVOIR
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
(MELAS PARK)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of
90_, by and between :THE VILLAGE OF MT.
PROSPECT,.a municipal corporation fher6inafter referred to as the
"Village") , the MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT and the ARLINGTON
HEIGHTS PARK DISTRICT, municipal corporations, (hereinafter jointly
referred to as "the Park Districts").
WHEREAS, all the parties hereto are legal entities
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the Village has entered into an agreement dated
the 24th day of September, 1981, and amended on the 18th day of
July, 1989, with the Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
(hereinafter referred to as the "Water Reclamation District") to
develop, improve, maintain and use the Water Reclamation District,
Retention Reservoir (Melas Park), as further described an Exhibit
1 attached hereto, for recreational and sport activities.
NOW, THEREFORE, for- and in consideration of Ten and
I
T_ L.LN`P P.3
No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and the premises, covenants and
undertakings of the parties hereinafter contained, and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION ONE
A. Grant of License
The Village does hereby grant to the Park Districts
the exclusive use of Melas Park except as otherwise provided
herein, for recreational events, activities and purposes for a
period commencing an the date of this agreement up to and including
May 31, 2011, and continuing thereafter until terminated by either
party upon 80 days prior written notice. The Park Districts shall
have the right at their sole expense to install athletic field
lighting, shelter houses and other recreational support facilities
and to install equipment, landscaping, shrubs and other plant
material, and parking lots subject to the prior written approval
of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District's Chief Engineer and
the Village Manager, all as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto
and made a part hereof. The exact size of the parking lots shall
be indicated on Exhibit A.
B. The Village shall maintain, at its expense, the
underground storm drainage systems leading into and out of the
detention basin. The Park Districts shall maintain the entire
grounds and all other improvements on the property and share the
cost between themselves of such maintenance in the manner they
F
mutually agree.
C. All maintenance and service fees for the extra
electrical service on the plateau bordering Central Road shall be
the responsibility of the Park Districts.
D. Anything in the agreement to the contrary
notwithstanding, the -Village reserves the right to conduit
maintenance on the underground drainage systems serving the
retention basin at any time on 48 hours notice to the Park
Districts and shall not be liable for any-,. disruption in Park
District programs. This shall in no way'affect the Village's right
to conduct emergency maintenance without notice to any parties.
SECTION TWO
A. Use - The Park Districts agree and specifically
understand that permission is confined solely to the exclusive
privilege to the Park Districts to use the premises described on
Exhibit I hereto; that the authority and permission herein given
does not thereby grant unto the Park Districts any interest or
estate in the said lands and that both the Village and the Water
Reclamation District retain control of said lands, including access
thereto at all times for emergency purposes and routine testing and
maintenance, and the right to enter upon and use the premises
herein described for the purpose of making such surveys, soil
borings or other purposes as may be deemed necessary by the Village
or the Water Reclamation District in the furtherance of corporate
3
. ......... .. . . ... . ..... ........ .. .... ..
C"U'l 10 '90 i3:4,3 "-L, U�PLLME f'EF- P. 5
purposes. However, any such use of the property, except for
emergencies and routine testing and maintenance by the Water
Reclamation District or the Village which would interfere with
scheduled Park District programs or activities may only be made
after the Water Reclamation District or the Village has given So
days prior written notice. In addition, the Village reserves the
right to allow use of the premises for the annual 4th of July
celebration, including a fireworks display, as well as up to four
other community events.
8. The Village reserves the right to allow the sale or
delivery of alcoholic beverages for the aforesaid five events in
each calendar year.
C. The Village also reserves the right to use the
premises for dumping snow and as a transfer point for dumping
leaves in the fall.
D. It is understood by the parties that the Village of
Arlington Heights has installed and maintains a pumping station on
the subject property. The Village of Arlington Heights shall
retain such covenants and/or license that it currently has to
enable it to continue to maintain the pumping station. The
existing access road to the pumping station shall remain open 24
hours a day, 365 days a year for access by the Villages of
Arlington Heights and Mount Prospect.
E. Additionally, the Village of Arlington Heights may
in the near future desire to construct a large underground storm
relief sewer on the subject 7 property. The Village of mount
4
I
4JG 10 '90 -'-3:4-4 1 LL, DPLLNEYEF
Prospect retains the full right to permit such underground storm
sewer on reasonable terms using reasonable caution to minimize the
disruption to the Park Districts' programs.
F. The Village shall have the abroluto right for as long
as the subject property is used by the Park Districts or either of
them to the exclusive use of a site of not less than one acre in
the extreme southwest corner of the property. The Village's only
payment to the Park Districts for the site shall be the reasonable
cost of moving structures or -equipment from --the area to another
portion of the site.
G. The Park Districts shall within 60 days of the
execution of the agreement tender to the village of mount Prospect
a Plat of Easement creating an exclusive easement in the Village
of Mount Prospect, not less than 201in width along the North line
of the current public works facility. The easement shall be for
utilities, ingress and egress and waterworks improvements to the
Village.
H. The Park Districts shall not erect or allow to be
erected upon said premises any structure of any type or kind not
described in Section One of the Agreement except with the consent,
in writing, of the Village Manager and of the Chief Engineer of the
Water Reclamation District.
I. The Park Districts further covenant and agree that
upon termination of this Agreement by expiration of its term or
otherwise the Park Districts shall upon request of the Village
remove or cause to be removed, any and all debris on the premises,
5
-20 13:44 R=7
and any and all landscaping, equipment, facilities, or other things
erected or placed upon said premises, and will yield up said
premises to the Village in as good condition as when the same was
entered upon by the Park Districts. Upon the Park Districts'
failure to do so, the Village after thirty (30.) days prior written
notice of intent to doso, may accomplish such removal at the sole
expense and cost of the Park Districts.
J. At the end of the 20 year leaae period or at such
time thereafter as the agreement may be terminated, all structures
erected on or in the property shall become the exclusive property
of the Village of Mount Propsect.
K. By this agreement the Village does not either
expressly or implicitly grant any variations, rezoning, special
uses or other zoning considerations to the Park Districts. it
shall be the responsibility of the Park Districts to petition the
Village of Mount Prospect for any zoning consideration it desires
under the laws and regulations in effect at the time the
application for the consideration is made.
SECTION THREE
A. In the event the Park Districts use or allow the
premises to be used for any purpose other than those hereinabove
specifically provided, or violate any of the provisions hereof,
then this Agreement may be terminated by the Village upon giving
the Park Districts thirty (30). days written notice to cease such
6
improper activity or correct such violation. If the Park Districts
fail to comply or are unable to comply with such notice, the Park
Districts shall forthwith vacate said premises and remove their
effects therefrom, at their expense. If the Agreement is
terminated for such cause or if this Agreement is terminated by the
Village because the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District
terminates the Village's lease or any other agreement pertaining
to the premises, the Park Districts shall vacate said premises and
remove their effects therefrom, at their expense, within eighty
(80) days of receiving written notice. If the agreement is
terminated 111, the Vill-s.qob—of—Mourt Prospect shall not, be liable
for any improvements installed by the Park 'Districts.
S. In the Event the Village terminates this agreement
for reasons other than breach by the Park Districts or by order of
the Water Reclamation District, the Village shall pay to the Park
Districts the depreciated cost of improvements made to the
property, determined through use or a 40 year straight line
depreciation method applied to the actual costs incurred by the
Park Districts in improving the property prior to September 1, 1992
for such things as engineering, surveying, grading, drainage,
seeding, landscaping, construction, purchase and/or installation
of structures and equipment.
C. If the work set forth on Exhibit Ais not
substantially completed by September 1, 1992, the Park Districts
shall reimburse the Village for all.costs incurred by the Village
to prepare the premises prior to that date, including but not
7
HUG 10 '90 12:45 GLAGS,H-L;-L,DALLrIE')'ER P. 9
limited to -storm drain work, engineering, grading and land
preparation. This september. 1, 1992 completion date shall be
extended for a like period of time that work may be delayed by
strikes, material shortages due to government regulations or acts
of God.
Egg=-CLN Foox
A. The Park Districts shall be solely responsible for
and shall defend, indemnify, keep and:save harmless, the Village
of Mt. Prospect and the Water Reclamation District, their officers,
commissioners, agents and employees, against all injuries, deaths,
losses, damages, claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs and
expenses, which may in any accrue, directly or indirectly, against
the Village or the Water Reclamation District, their officers,
agents or employees, in consequence of the granting of this
permission, or which may in any way result therefrom or from any
work done thereunder, whether ornot it ahall be alleged or
determined that the act was caused through negligence or omission
of the Park Districts, or Park Districts' employees, or of any
contractor or subcontractor, or their employees, if any, and f6r
any damage done to the Park Districts property on account of flood,
rainfall or snow water damage, and the Park Districts shall, at
their sole expense, appear, defend, and pay all charges of
attorneys and all costs and other expenses arising therefrom or
incurred in connection therewith-.
8
C -r -
However, notwithstanding anything stated above, the Park
Districts shall not be liable to the Village or the Water
Reclamation District to defend or hold them harmless for any claim
arising out of injury to persons or property which may be caused
solely by the Village or the water Reclamation District, their
officers, agents or employees.
B. In addition, the Village shall be solely responsible
for and shall defend, indemnify, keep and save harmless, the Park
Districts and the Water Reclamation District, their officers,
commissioners, agents and employeesi 'against all injuries, deaths,
losses, damages, claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs and
expenses, which may in any way accrue, direct -Ly or Indirectly,
against the Park Districts or either of them or their officers,
agents or employees resulting solely from the Village's or Water
Reclamation District's use and maintenance of the property, for the
annual Fourth Of July celebration and fireworks display or other
events sponsor,!ad by the Village, -whether or :tot it shall be alleged
or determined that the act was caused through the negligence or
omission of the Village of Mt. Prospect, or the Village's agents
or employees or of any contractor, subcontractor or service
organization or their agents or employees, if any, and the Village
shall, at its sole expense, appear, defend, and pay all charges of
attorneys and all costs and other expenses arising therefrom or
incurred in connection therewith.
C. The Park Districts, prior to entering upon said
premises and using same for the purposes for which this permission
9
is issued, shall procure and maintain commeruia-1 general 'Liability
insurance with Insurance companies acceptable to the Village. The
insurance shall be written on an occurrence basis, include
contractual liability, and name the Village, its commissioners,
officers and employees as additional Insureds. The minimum limit'
of liability in any roingle occurrence %hall be $10,000,000 and
shall include bodily injury, persona! Injury and property damage
liability. Such insurance shall be maintained in full effect
during the term of this agreement.
The Park District shall, prior to entering upon said
premises and using saute for the purposeu ft)r which this permission
is issued, provide the Village with a certificate of insurance
verifying the above coverages are in affect.
The certificate shall also verify that each insurance
policy shall bear an endorsement precluding cancellation, reduction
or material change in coverage without firvt giving the village at
least 30 days prior notice of same in writing.
The parties expressly understand and agree that the
insurance protection required by this Agreement, or otherwise
provided by the parties, shall in no way limit the responsibility
of the parties to defend, indemnify, keep and save harmless the
others in accord with the terms of this agreement.
SECTTON =VJ
The Park- Districts shall render an
10
accounting with with respect to finances for the Parks on April
30th of each year. The accounting shall indicate all ra-uc-niioa
derived from user fees or concessions at the !,subject property and
all expenses incurred by the Park Districts in operating, servicing
and rm.aintaining the subject property. It the revenue exceeds the
expenses as aforesaid, the balance shall be paid first to the
Village of Mcunt Prospect to offset any unreimbureed expewise it may
have incurred over the preceding 36 'months for maintaining the
subject property and any remaining amounts shall be deposited into
d Park District fund, the sole purposb of which is maintenance or
development of the subject property.
SECTIOiJ SIX
RO—ti-919 - Any notice herein provided to be given ghall be
deemed properly served if delivered in writing personally or mailed
by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, to the parties in care of such persons or addresses as
either party may from time to time designate in writing.
Wherever this agreement conflicts with any previous
agreements and leases signed with the Metropolitan sanitary
District (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District) and still in
effect, the previous agreements and leases with the Metropolitan
Sanitary District (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District) shall
be in full force and effect and any conflicts in this agreement
shall be null and void.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the _parties hereto have caused these
11
presenia to- be executed in triplicate by their duly authorized
officials, and to be duly atte&ted and have caused their corporate
seals to be }fixed hereunto, all on the day and year first above
written.
ATTEST:
i)HUME -CLERK,---
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
12
VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT
"MMIO
MT. PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS PARR
DISTRICT
MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
SAFETY COMMISSION
AUGUST 6, 1990
I. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety
Commission was called to order at 7:35 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Absent:
Lee Beening,
Chairman
John Metzenthin,
Cmnissioner
Tom Daley,
Police Dept.
Buz Livingston,
Fire Dept.
Drew Johanson,
Engr. Dept.
Andy Mitchell,
Camnissioner
Art Coy,
Comdssioner
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Tom Daley, 2nd. by John Metzenthin, moved to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting of The Safety Commission
held March 5, 1990.
Motion passed unanimously.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. 'The'Safety Commission reviewed the parking restrictions
on Prospect Ave. & recommend the following:
1. Two hour parking on the south side between Central
Rd. & Mt. Prospect Rd & also on the north side
between Main St. & Emerson St.
2. Four hour parking on the north side between Elmhurst
Ave. & Main & between Emerson St. & Maple St.
3. Twelve hour meter parking between Central Rd. &
Elmhurst Ave. & between Maple St. & Mt. Prospect Rd.
Recommendation passed unanimously.
B. The Safety Commission reviewed the information received
from IDOT regarding the request from the residents of
Crystal Tower for "No Right Turn on Red" sign at
Algonquin Rd. & Busse Rd.
The Village & two elected officials of the state have
requested this turning restriction at the request of the
residents. IDOT is not responsive to the appeals at all.
Chairman Beening stated there was nothing further the
Village can do and suggested if the residents wish to
pursue the turn restriction, - that they contact IDOT
directly.
Commission'Members concurred unanimously.
C. The Safety Commission reviewed a request from the
Northwest Meadows Association for a Yield sign at the
intersection of Henry St. & Forest Ave.
commissioner Metzenthin, 2nd. by Buz Livingston moved to
concur and recommend the installation of a Yield Sign on
Henry St. at Forest Ave.
Motion passed unanimously
D. The Safety Commission reviewed the concerns of School
District 59, regarding Robert Frost School. The school's
Safety Committee's letter indicates children cross
Cottonwood Lane indiscriminately between intersections.
Drew Johanson informed the members Cottonwood Lane has
been repaved and the old crosswalk markings had not been
replaced.
Chairman Beening, 2nd. by commissioner Metzenthin, moved
to recommend to replace the crosswalk markings as they
existed prior to construction.
Motion passed unanimously
V. ADJOURNMENT
Having no further business the meeting was adjourned at
8:40 p.m.
Respectfully, submitted,
Drew Johanson
DJ:dk:minutes
Pete & Angelo's Inc.
15 W. Prospect Ave.
Mt. Prospect, Ill. 60056
July 31, 1990
Village of Mt. Prospect
Liquor Control Commission
Village Hall
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Gentlemen:
A request is hereby made on behalf of our business, for permission to
install an outdoor cafe for the purpose of serving food and alcoholic beverages
(full service).
The outdoor seating would consist of small tables and chairs on Prospect
Avenue directly in front of our restaurant.
An additional request is made that the hours of serving would be extended to
9 or 10 p.m. for outdoor dining in order that we accomodate people returning from
work and wishing to dine along with their families after 7 p.m.
We look forward to sitting down and discussing this in greater detail at
your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Angelo Theotokat9s
AT/ka
Sec. 9. 115. Coir-.rcial Use of Sidewalk Space, Special Per The Director of Public
Woo .is authorized herein to issue a special p, ---.,jt for the use of public
sidewalk space for restaurant tables subject to the following conditions:
A. The use of public sidewalk space for restaurant tables shall only be permitted incidental
to the operation of a restaurant on private contiguous property, and shall be limited
to a period of time between eleven o'clock (11:00) A.M. and seven o'clock (7:00)
P.M. on any day of the week including Sunday.
B. The use of sidewalk space permitted for restaurant purposes shall not reduce, obstruct
or encroach upon the open portion of any public sidewalk available for pedestrian
travel to less than four feet (4') in width.
C. Applications for the special permit provided for herein shall be submitted to and
first reviewed by the Director of Public Works who shall in turn submit the same
to the Director of Public Health for review and a report that all present restaurant
operations of the applican are in accordance with applicable Village food service
rules and regulations.
D. Applications for the special permit provided for herein shall contain a statement
by the applicant, under oath, that the applicant shall maintain the sidewalk area
in a clean and safe condition; shall keep the required open portion of the sidewalk
_W
free from any obstructions or encroachments pertaining to restaurant use; and shall
comply with all of the conditions of this Section.
E. Applicants holding a valid liquor license shall be allowed to 'dispense alcoholic
beverages within the restaurant area contained in this special permit pursuant to the
conditions and restrictions of the applicant's liquor license, and subject to the following
additional restrictions:
_1
1. Only beer and wine shall be served within the sidewalk area covered by this special
permit.
2. Alcoholic beverages shall be served in plastic or other nonbreakable containers
other than glass.
3. Alcoholic beverages shall be consumed at the restaurant tables provided within
this special permit area and no such beverage or container shall be removed or car-
ried away from the table where it is served.
4. All other provisions of this Code pertaining to the sale and consumption of
alcoholic beverages including closing hours shall remain applicable and shall be in
full force and effect with respect to the sale and serving of beer and wine pursuant
to this special permit.
F. The applicant shall furnish to the Village evidence of public liability insurance, naming
the Village as an additional party insured, and insuring the applicant and the Village
against any liability resulting from the commercial use permitted pursuant to this
Section. Liability insurance coverage shall be in an amount which shall not be less
than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per occurrence.
G. All tables, chairs and other furniture and equipment shall be removed daily by the
applicant from the public sidewalk area during periods of time when the permitted
restaurant use is not in operation.
H. All food shall be served on plastic or other nonbreakable and disposable plates and
utensils.
An annual permit fee shall be charged for such special permit and shall be in an
amount which is the sum of fifty dollars ($50.00) plus fifty cents ($0.50) per square
foot of sidewalk space used.
The permit issued herein shall be in effect for a period of one year, but may be
revoked at any time for any reason by the Director of Public Works or by the Village
Manager upon the giving of two (2) days' notice to the applicant at his business
address. In the event of such revocation, a prorata refund shall be made to the ap-
plicant of that portion of the unused annual permit fee. (Ord. 3236, 7-6-82)
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT RECYCLING COMMISSION
AUGUST 16, 1990
Conference Room B, Public Works Facility
1700 West Central Road
7:30 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. CITIZEN FORUM
IV. CABLE VIDEO - MIKE LOCASHIO, INTERN
V. EXISTING PROGRAM STATUS REVIEW
A. Curbside recycling
B. Yard material
C. Program Expansion
1) Multifamily
2) Plastics/metals - BFI processing center
VI. SOLID WASTE SURVEY
VII. RECONSTITUTING COMMISSION'S ROLE
VIII. ALTERNATIVES TO PAPER MARKET
IX. STATUS REPORT - CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
X. OTHER BUSINESS
XI. NEXT MEETING
XII. ADJOURN
MOUNT PROSPECT RECYCLING COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
JULY 19, 1990
PRESENT: Dick Bachhuber, Paul Hoefert, Joe Kubik, Brian Robertson,
Ken Westlake and Mary Winkler.
Glen Andler and Lisa Angell - Public Works Staff
Mr. David Kowal, Assistant Village Manager, Wheeling
Mr. Harold Rentschler, Mount Prospect resident
ABSENT: Elizabeth Herbert, George Luteri and Steve Polit
Chairman Westlake called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM and stated
their would be a change in the agenda to accomodate Mr. Kowal; item
#6 to follow item #4.
The June meeting minutues were reviewed and approved with the following
corrections: .
1) Page 3, 2nd paragraph, 3rd line; that EPA ... should read
that US EPA..
ff 1K 4th line; could satisfy ... should read
could satisfy some of the ....
objections. Add US EPA continues
to oppose the project on grounds of threat to habitat and inadequate
alternatives analysis.
2) Corrected spelling of Commissioner Hoefert's last name
Mr. Harold Rentschler, President, Prospect Meadows Homeowners
Association stated he attends the meetings to obtain updated
information on the recycling program. Mr. Rentschler indicated members
of the Homeowners Association often call him for recycling information.
He also stated he would like to see more growth in the recycling
program but does understand why it does not progress at the rate many
of us would like it to.
Mr. David Kowal, Assistant Village Manager, Wheeling made an
informative presentation, to the Commission, on the curbside collection
program which provides for monthly collection of household items by
Goodwill Industries. Before discussing the details of the program Mr.
Kowal provided some general background on Wheeling's recycling program.
The Village of Wheeling instituted its recycling program in May of 1989
with 5,000 homes. Since onset of the program there has been a
consistent 87% participation rate which he feels maybe attributed to
promotional efforts.
Wheeling's involvement with Goodwill came about indirectly through
their scavenger, Waste Management. Apparently Goodwill Industries
approached Waste Management requesting their trucks be allowed to
piggyback recycling trucks.
Waste Management then presented the concept to Wheeling officials who
agreed to the program with the following stipulations:
1) The contract agreement between Buffalo Grove/Wheeling Disposal
Company (subsidiary of Waste Management) and the Village states the
disposal company selects the charitable organization.
2) Charitable organization must take everything even if goods are not
salvageable.
3) Buffalo Grove/Wheeling Disposal have to pick up any materials left
behind by charitable organization by 7:00 PM (day of collection).
4) Truck of charitable organization,niust be well maintained and
marked; must be staffed with at least one collector.
5) The charitable organization truck must follow the recycling truck.
(A new bag and tax donation receipt are placed into the recycling
bin of participants after collection.)
Mr. Kowal stated when the program started in December of 1989 that
Goodwill and Waste Management had done a great deal to promote the
program including news coverage on the kick-off day. Prior to the
first day of collection Goodwill staff went door to door providing
residents with a bag for their household goods, a letter from the
Wheeling Village President, a calendar indicating collection week
(first full week of every month), and a fact sheet from Goodwill.
Deemed a success, the Village of Wheeling recently renewed their
agreement with Waste Management for the Goodwill collection program.
The participation rate is generally 10% but has risen to 13% during the
spring months. According to Mr. Kowal about 95% of the materials
collected by Goodwill are salvageable. Mr. Kowal also added the
Goodwill service is done at no cost to the Village other than his time.
When questioned about any problem areas Mr. Kowal stated there was an
initial problem of the tax receipts blowing away but this was resolved
when adhesive was put on the back of the receipts. In response to the
concern of theft he stated there is more of a problem with aluminum
than household goods.
Mr. Kowal was also asked if there were any figures as to how much
material was diverted from the landfill because of the program and if
the program increased the rate of participation in the recycling
program. He did not have any data on diversion nor was he sure if
there was any correlation between the Goodwill program and rate of
participation.
Mr. Kowal suggested we contact Mr. Bob McMann at Goodwill, (312)
207-0040 or Mr. Lee Adleman, Waste Management, (708) 572-8800 for
further information if we were considering a similar service.
Following his presentation an the Goodwill program Mr. Kowal also
updated the Commission on additional projects for Wheeling's recycling
program.
1) Starting July 1 Wheeling added plastics to curbside collection
2) In the near future the Village will begin recycling office paper
Glen Andler stated based on data from BFI approximately 15% of the
homeowners are using the bag system. He also informed the Commission
that there was a substantial,increase,in tipping fees at the Land and
Lakes compost facility.
Glen then distributed a memo announcing the current paper market. Due
to the lag in the paper market the Village is not receiving any revenue
for paper collected in the curbside pickup.
In response to the Commission's decision not to expand yard bag sales
to additional retailers, Glen distributed the letter he sent to
businessess explaining this decision.
MULTIFAMILY
Mr. Andler informed Commissioners, BFI is considering the use of 90
gallon containers for co -mingled recyclables rather than dumpsters at
multifamily sites.
Where condusive, curbside collection of recyclables will be considered
at multifamily units. The implementation of this type of collection
raised discussion as to who should pay for the bin. one suggestion was
to charge the property owner and then have he/she spread the cost of
the bin to the renter over a 12 month rental period. This matter will
need to be resolved prior to implementation of service.
Glen indicated the cost for multifamily dwellings receiving curbside
pickup would be $1.11 per unit. Glen will be meeting with Tom
Kleczewski, BFI, to identify specifics on servicing these units.
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Paul Hoefert reported he has met with Chamber representatives and they
are still putting together a Task Force. There is a meeting scheduled
for August 14 so the Task -Force can meet with a few of the business
firms currently doing paper collection. The plan at this time is to
involve the businesses at Kensington Center and then Randhurst.
Mary Winkler stated she spoke with a representative from Randhurst,
Hugh Rafferty. Mr. Rafferty stated Randhurst has approached BFI about
recycling but was told BFI's priority is the residential area. He
indicated he would be very interested in establishing a recycling
program at Randhurst. He feels the merchants would be very interested
and that cardboard would be their biggest commodity. According to Mr.
Rafferty Montgom6ry Wards already recycles corrugated cardboard.
DRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE
Ken Westlake submitted the residential waste questionnaire, he drafted,
for typing. The questionnaire will be available for the Commissions
review in the August recycling packet.
DISCUSSION OF WHEELING PROGRAM
Commission members shared their thoughts on Wheelings recycling of
household goods through Goodwill. Although there was no final decision
as to whether Mount Prospect would implement a similar program it was
agreed that BFI should contact Goodwill to discuss feasibility.
FACILITIES TOUR
Glen Andler reminded everyone of the tour scheduled for Saturday, July
21; Land and Lakes Compost Facility, Mallard Lake Landfill and the
proposed site of the balefill.
OTHER BUSINESS
Glen Andler informed the Commissioners that the American Public Works
Association was sponsoring a solid waste seminar November 7 and 8 in
Chicago. He encouraged the members to attend the seminar and stated
Mount Prospect would have a display.
The next Commission meeting was set for August 16 and there being no
other business the meeting adjourned at 9:55 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
M. Lisa Angell
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: LEL FLOROS, CHAIRMAN, MOUNT PROSPECT 75TH ANNIVERSARY
COMMITTEE
DATE: AUGUST 6, 1990
Mount Prospect 75th Anniversary Committee met Saturday, August 4th in the Trustees
Room of the Village Hall.
"Mount Prospect Diamond Jubilee" was selected as the name of the Village's 75th
Celebration to be held in 1992. The 'name' committee offered many suggestions, but the
Anniversary Committee felt the straight -forward "Mount Prospect Diamond Jubilee" was
the best description of the event.
A dinner -dance to mark the start of the anniversary events is scheduled for February 1,
1992. A committee was named to get information regarding the banquet. It was felt
that the dinner -dance should definitely be held in Mount Prospect.
Hands Across Mount Prospect is scheduled for Sunday, February 2nd with church bells
ringing during the hand holding. A committee was named to work on the project.
On Monday, February 3, 1992; the actual date of the 75th Anniversary, it was suggested
that the diamond lights all over town be turned at 5 p.m. and lighted every evening for
the remainder of the week. However, other suggestions were made for the lighting as
well. This will be discussed in detail at the next meeting.
Other major activities during 1992 include a giant parade on May 1, the dedication of
the Historical Society Museum in September and a House Walk in December.
Naturally, the Anniversary Committee would expect that all events in town throughout
1992 would carry the Diamond Jubilee theme.
John Engel is the Treasurer for the 75th Anniversary Committee and he was asked to
talk to the Presidents of the two local banks to determine if each is interested in having
the Anniversary Committee account, what the institution could do for the Committee, etc.
Engel will report to the Committee at the next meeting.
The Village staff prepared stationary for the Committee - copy attached.
LF/caf
Mount Prospect 75th Anniversary Committee
Village of Mount Prospect
10.") Sk3uth Erj,,�ersor� Stieat
Mount PwN-,WSPeC.%. Mjnou s F7, ,6
LA HMOs
Chain-yvarl
708 255 1985