Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0148_001MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AUGUST 8, 1989 I. ROLL CAL The meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m. Present at the meeting were: Mayor Gerald L Farley; 71rustees Ralph Arthur, Mark Busse, Timothy Corcoran, and Theodore Wattenberg. Absent from the meeting were: Trustees Leo Floros and George Van Geem. Also present at the meeting were: Assistant Village Manager Michael Janonis, Director of Public Works Herbert Weeks and Director of Planning and Zoning David Clements. Also present were three persons from the print media. H. MINUTES The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of July 11, 1989 were accepted and filed. III- CMEM TO BE HEARD Ms. Dolores Haugh, President of the Mount Prospect Historical Society, spoke to Committee members regarding the accomplishments of the Historical Society over the past year. Among other things, Ms. Haugh indicated that the Historical Society was the recipient of a Runners Up Award in the Governor's Home Town Awards Program for its outstanding achievement for a community -wide volunteer program. Ms. Haugh also distributed a comprehensive report of the Historical Society's activities over the past year with regard to fund-raising and rehabilitation of the Historical Museum at 101-103 South Maple Street. IV. RE, MST fly''MIM IYOR EXPA L1IQ R LICENSE Committee members reviewed a letter from Mount Prospect Park District President Rosemary Arps in which she requested that the Park District be allowed to serve all types of liquor at special events and private parties held at the Mount Prospect Golf Club -Community Center. Park District Director Thomas Tayler was present to present the Park District's request and answer questions. Mr. Tayler indicated that hard liquor would not be sold in the grill area to the general public. He also stated that full service capabilities would only be utilized during a limited number of special events such as local civic group functions and private golf outings. Discussion among Committee members resulted in a consensus that an expanded Liquor License should be granted to the Park District with the following caveats: 1. The ability to serve hard liquor be limited to a specific number of events. 2. That the License be granted on a conditional basis which would be reviewed at the end of the first full License year. 3. That the types of functions be limited to local civic organizations and special events and not include such things as wedding receptions and general parties. Committee members were concerned that the Golf Club -Community Center was located in a residential area and they did not want the expanded License to have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Committee members felt comfortable with a conditional License so that there would be an opportunity to �-view the operation of the Park District and determine whether such an arrangement was in the best interest of the community. Additionally, the Committee unanimously agreed to waive the $750 annual License fee. Many fe , th-it �t was somewhat useless for one taxing body to require this type of payment from another. Staff was directed to draft the necessary Ordinance so that the change could be effectuated. Cable Television Administrator Karen Giet reviewed her memo with Committee members regarding the staffing and financial requirements of televising Zoning Board of Appeals' meetings. Ms. Giet re-emphasized the need for additional personnel if Committee members decided that such additional programming was warranted. Ms. Giet stated that the need for a reliable, well-trained staff was necessary in the event of live broadcasts. She also stated that the changes in personnel status would enhance the Division's overall production capabilities. Discussion among Committee members resulted in a consensus that there was no perceived need to televise Zoning Board of Appeals meetings at this time. Many Committee members felt that most ZBA matters were of a routine nature and would not be of much interest to the general public. N Committee members did, however, feel the need to review staffing requirements in light of the expressed need for a reliable staff to increase programming capabilities. However, it was generally felt that the discussion should take place with a full Board and that .substantial time be devoted to this type of discussion. After further discussion, the Committee members directed that the question of Cable Television staffing be back for further discussion at a subsequent Committee of the Whole meeting. Committee members reviewed a memorandum from Public Works Director Herbert Weeks regarding the Village's Leaf Disposal Program. 13rieily, Mr. Weeks indicated that for over the past ten years, the Village has been fortunate enough to be able to dispose of leaves it collects as part of its leaf Collection Program. with a farmer who operates an organic farm in Barrington. This arrangement has saved the Village substantial monies in tipping fees and from a conservation standpoint, also promotes recycling and the ,preservation of precious landfill space Mr. Weeks indicated that the farmer has requested a flat tipping fee charge of 16, to dispose of this upcoming year's leaf collections. Ile farmer intends to use this money to purchase and modify equipment for his organic farming operation, Mr. Weeps indicated that he felt the request was reasonable and would save the Village money in the long -run. Discussion among Committee members resulted in unanimous approval of the request. Staff was instructed to proceed with this project. Committee members reviewed memorandums from Public Works Director Weeks and Finance Director David Jepson regarding the technical and financial aspects of the rehabilitation of the existing elevated water tank or the relocation of that tank to a new site. Mr. Weeks' memo indicated that while the tank is presently in good condition, it can be expected that over the next twenty years a substantial amount of maintenance and remedial work would be required to keep the tank in operating condition. Additionally, Mr. Weeks indicated that consideration should be given to the difficulties that will be encountered in attempting to repaint the tank dire to the fact that the Hemphill housing development is located directly below and to the east of the elevated tank. _3_ Finance Director David Jepson presented a detailed review of the costs associated with the maintenanceof a tank over twenty years as well as costs involved in replacing the tank presently and then maintaining a new tank over the same twenty year period. Mr. Jepson's calculations indicated that the Village could save approximately $200,000 over the twenty-year timeframe if the tank were replaced with a new one at a'different locatiom Mr. Weeks indicated that the most logical spot for a new tank at this time would be near the new Public Works facility at Melas :bark. Mr. reeks indicated that this would require discussions with the Metropolitan "Dater Reclamation District regarding the feasibility of acquiring additional property for the tank to be located on. There was extensive discussion among Committee members. Trustee Arthur indicated that he was not in favor ofmoving the tank at this time. He felt that the remaining twenty year life of the existing tank should be exploited fully and that if properly screened, the existing tank could be painted without causing harm to the nearby housing development. Trustee Corcoran indicated that the information presented to the Committee was a starting point for further discussion. Trustee Corcoran indicated that he would :like to have more information regarding the financial aspects of this proposal. He indicated that he would like to see net present value analysis done on 20 and 40 year timeframes as well as looking at the possibility of deferring construction of a new tank for an additional ten years. Additionally, Trustee Corcoran suggested that the analysis of this matter be referred to the Finance Commission for their review and recommendations. Trustee Wattenberg favored moving the tank based on the, information supplied. Further,; he asked for input from members of the Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission. BDDRC Chairman Hal Predovich appeared briefly to indicate that ;the Downtown Development Commission would be interested in studying the possible reuse of the elevated tank site should the decision be made to move it. Mr. Predovich indicated that from a simply aesthetic point of view, the tank should probably go. However, Mr. Predovich indicated that financial considerations obv,ou--ly w --re more important in this regard. Mayor Farley indicated that he felt this was a decision based mainly on financial considerations and saw little or no redevelopment issues involved. Mayor Farley also indicated that he favored the idea of referring the matter to the Finance Commission for their review. -4- Trustee Busse indicated that he looked favorably upon the recommendation that the elevated tank be moved from its present site. He felt that there appeared to be financial justification for such a recommendation. However, he too supported the recommendation that the Finance Commission review this matter in greater detail. Finance Commission Chairman Dick Bachhuber was- in the audience and upon questioning, indicated that the Finance Commission would be more than happy to look at this item. Assistant Village Manager Michael Janonis asked that this item be given priority with the Finance Commission and that they report back as soon as possible. Mr. Janonis indicated that while maintenance could be deferred until the spring, and if necessary for a longer period of time, it would be prudent to make a decision regarding the future of the tank especially in light of the anticipated future development of Melas Park by the Mount Prospect and Arlington Heights Park Districts in conjunction with the Village of Mount Prospect and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District. I i:i:1IiIIIIt;1IIiI Assistant Village Manager Michael Janonis briefly updated Committee members regarding the flooding caused by the heavy rains on morning of Friday, August 4. Mr. Janonis indicated that while there was widespread flooding of basements, overall the Village fared well as compared to other surrounding communities, Me. Janonis also reported that the Maple I and Wille Street Commuter Lots would be closed over the upcoming weekend for crack sealing and that during the following weekend, the Lots would be seal coated. Ix. ANY OTHER BU INESS Mr. Robert Ahearn appeared before Committee members to request the Board give consideration to granting him a Liquor License for his establishment at 1021 East Algonquin Road known as the Satellite Bar and Grill. Mr. Ahearn indicated that he had been attempting to obtain a Liquor License for his establishment for the last two years and that he had been tinsurcessfvl. After brief discussion by Committee members, staff was directed to work with Mr. Ahearn and to report back to Committee members regarding the status of this matter. At 8:59 p.m., it was moved by Trustee Arthur and seconded by Trustee Busse to convene in an Executive Session for the purposes of discussing personnel matters and potential land acquisition. me X, " At 9;34 para.„ Committee members reconvened without taking f irther.action and on a motion by Trustee Corcoran and seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, the meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL E. JANONIS Assistant ' Village. Manager MEJ/rcw -6- Phone 312 / 392-6000 TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY COMMITTEE DATE: AUGUST 17, 1989 SUBJECT: PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY FINAL REPORT MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY TRUSTEES RALPH W. ARTHUR MARK W. BUSSE TIMOTHY J CORCORAN LEO FLOROS Village of Mount Prospect GEORGE R VAN SEEM THEODORE J WATTENBERG VILLAGE MANAGER 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 JOHN FULTON CIXON Phone 312 / 392-6000 TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY COMMITTEE DATE: AUGUST 17, 1989 SUBJECT: PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY FINAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Several months ago, at the direction of the Village Manager, a Committee was formed with the express purpose of assimilating existing information, developing additional necessary data and identifying a realistic range of options for addressing the deficiencies of the current Public Safety Facility. That task is now complete and staff stands ready to issue its report and to begin working with the Mayor and Board of Trustees in identifying the most efficient and affordable course of action. Much work remains to be done. The technical limitations of the Village staff make it imperative that an experienced, multi -disciplined professional be hired to supplement our efforts. Additionally, an outside opinion can only serve to add credibility to the findings contained herein. It is our hope that the Board concurs in that view. The Committee feels that whatever the outcome of this process, it can only serve to better educate the public with regard to the vital services provided by the Village's Police and Fire Departments. Mechanical ZStructural /!Code Deficiencigs Included in this Section are the original reports from Public Works, Fire Prevention and Inspection Services regarding their inspections of the Public Safety Building. M The Committee believes these reports can stand on their own without the need for extensive comment. Please note, however, the comments regarding the condition of the electrical system; i.e., "Cloth electrical wire is dry and brittle; some is bare and some is not conduit." Taken in conjunction with the comments of the Fire Prevention Bureau, it becomes painfully obvious that we are pushing the bounds of good judgment in allowing these conditions to exist. We are also setting a poor example in the community as we stress the need for compliance with our own Life/Safety Codes. This item is included for purposes of illustration and direction from the Board. It points up the fact that each time we undertake in-house renovation and remodeling, we are addressing only the symptoms of the underlying problems with the building. These attempts at improving the situation do not move the building closer to conformance with Village Codes or serve to increase the efficiency of Police and Fire operations. The proposed remodeling of the Court Room will cost approximately $26,000. The Committee felt it was prudent to delay this expenditure until such time as the Board has made clearer its intentions on the Public Safety Facility. SECTIONS 11 AND III 'These Sections were included in the report as a direct result of Trustee Corcoran's request that the Police and Fire Chiefs make a current assessment of the operational deficiencies of the facility with an eye on the effect these deficiencies would have on future operations. Included in these Sections are a synopsis of current operations, an organizational chart, floor plans for each Department and a detailed evaluation of the facility from an operational standpoint. Both the Police and Fire Departments accomplished this task by organizing sub- committees made up of the two Chiefs, Command Staff and line personnel. Input was solicited from both sworn members and civilian staff. This information was then analyzed by the sub -committees as well as the full Public Safety Facility Committee. After extensive commentary and revision, the deficiencies were prioritized and became part of the final reports. Where feasible, suggestions for improvements were included. These reports represent the best professional judgments of the Fire and Police Chiefs. They will be -present -at the Committee -of the Whole meeting to answer any questions which may arise. Please note that manpower issues are addressed under a separate heading in Section VIII -Miscellaneous Considerations. SECTION IV This Section includes information relevant to the current site. The property appraisal contains a wealth of factual data that will be useful in analyzing the potential for reuse or redevelopment of the site. At this point in time, the Committee feels that the present site of the Public Safety Building will continue to be the preferred location for Police/Fire operations because: a) The original intent of the grantors was to provide a site for a Fire Station. b) The building has achieved its own identity as the Public Safety Building. c) The downtown location allows for convenient public access and high visibility to the community. d) Its central location (geographically) is conducive to Police and Fire operations. e) There is a lack of attractive alternate sites within the Village (see Section V). Finally, the Village owns the property on which the Public Safety Building is located. Substantial costs s,-,ings, will be realized if further land acquisition is not required. This preference is premised on the fact that an enhanced facility can be physically located on the site along with adequate parking. There is no doubt that the odd shape of the parcel and the overall lack of lot size will present a challenge to both staff and the consultant in bringing about an acceptable design. However, preliminary indications are that this is achievable (please reference the Concept Site Plans included in this Section). If it becomes clear that the present site is inadequate or that the Board would simply like to look at alternative redevelopment options for the site, the Planning and Zoning staff, in conjunction with the consultant, will be in a position to provide preliminary data on this subject as part of the consultant's report. In the interim, please note the comments of the appraiser regarding the redevelopment potential for the site. SECTION -Alternate Site Data The information contained herein is the result of an inventory of open space and potentially suitable existing structures located throughout the Village. From that original inventory, five sites were chosen for further preliminary analysis. Planning and Zoning staff, with the assistance of an appraiser, developed background data for each of the five sites. No contact has been made with the different property owners. With the previously stated preference for the current site, further analysis of this data will be undertaken as part of the consultant's site development work. The most obvious result of this exercise was the confirmation that limited open space remains available within the Village limits. SECTION VI Without a doubt, this is one of the most crucial factors in determining the feasibility of enhancing the Public Safety Facility. At this point in time, it is also one of the most difficult factors to get a clear picture of. Regardless, Finance Director David Jepson has developed rationally -based parameters within which further discussion will develop. These parameters are grounded in the Village Board's long-standing policies of fiscal conservatism; stable Tax Rates and providing the best scope of services that we can Affad. As stated in Mr. Jepson's memorandum, his conclusions are based on certain assumptions lie was required to make at this early stage of the process. As such, they are subject to change based on the consultant's findings and ultimately, actual bid results and the then current condition of the financial market place. However, the assumptions are based upon information we have been able to develop regarding construction costs; discussions with architectural firms and projections of the financial market place. In your review of this Section, please note that Mr. Jepson has provided for the possibility of a sizable Property Tax abatement over a five year period. While the ultimate decision regarding this is up to the Mayor and Board of Trustees, the ability to do so is in keeping with past Board practice and recognizes the increasing Tax burden being placed on the average homeowner from all segments of government. Mr. Jepson will be available at the meeting to answer your questions SECTION VII A strong field of seven (7) architectural/engineering firms responded to the Village's Request for Proposals. Each proposal was thoroughly reviewed according to four major criteria: 1. Responsiveness to RFP. 2. Ability to provide full, multi -disciplined services in-house. 3. Prior relevant experience with Police and Fire facilities. 4. Cost. As a result, the Committee recommends that the firm of Donohue and Associates be retained to conduct a Space Utilization Study of the Public Safety Building. Supporting materials and the full recommendation of the Committee are contained in Section VII. Miscella!2cous.-CAnsi derations This Section covers areas of importance which do not fit neatly into the other categories. An opinion from the Village's General Counsel, outlining the statutory requirements for the establishment of a Referendum question, is included in anticipation of the Board's desire to solicit the input of the Village's residents. A brief discussion of future manpower needs is also included Finally, the need for temporary facilities to house both Police and Fire operations during any renovation or reconstruction is discussed at length. CONCLUSION The task ahead will not be easy. In question is a potentially large expenditure of public funds. Additionally, this discussion will take place against the backdrop of citizen concern over taxation. However, the fact remains that the current Public Safety Facility contains critical deficiencies that no doubt affect the efficient operations of the Police and Fire Departments. That they have been able to achieve standards of excellence in spite of the present facility is a tribute to the human resources that make up the Village work force. If there are any services provided at the local level that touch every segment of the population - it is the services provided by Police, Fire and Public Works. If the debate is full; if the facts are brought out; and if the expenditure is prudent, the Committee feels that Mount Prospect residents will respond favorably. MICHAEL . J NIS M,nl! Vo� Chairman MEJ/rcw Public Safety Facility Committee Phone 312 / 392-6000 TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY COMMITTEE DATE: AUGUST 16, 1989 SUBJECT: PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY PROPOSALS On Wednesday, August 9, 1989, proposals were received in the Manager's Office responding to a "Request for Proposals" for a Public Safety Facility Space Utilization Study. Proposals Reggiygd A total of 13 Reque�,t for i1roposals were mailed out to various architectural firms who either possessed relevant experience or who requested to be included in any such mailing. Timely responses were received from 7 firms, These included: 1. John Victor Frega Associates, Ltd. 2. PGA/McDonough 3. Applied Design Associates, Ltd. 4. Richard Preves and Associates 5. Otis Associates, Inc. 6. O'Donnel, Wicklund, Pigozzi and Peterson, Inc. 7. Donohue and Associates AnAJYsis of Proposals Proposals were reviewed individually and collectively by the members of the Public Safety Facility Committee. Each proposal was reviewed according to four major criteria: 1. RMonsiveness to REP - Looking for more than a simple restatement of the issues; providing additional observations and comments; firm philosophy and methodology; ability to meet time constraints, MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY TRUSTEES RALPH W ARTHUR MARK W BUSSE. TIMOTHY J CORCORAN LEO FLOROS Village of Mount Prospect GEORGE R VAN GEEM THEODORE J. WAT7FNBERG VILLAGE MANAGER 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 JOHN FULTON DIXON Phone 312 / 392-6000 TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY COMMITTEE DATE: AUGUST 16, 1989 SUBJECT: PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY PROPOSALS On Wednesday, August 9, 1989, proposals were received in the Manager's Office responding to a "Request for Proposals" for a Public Safety Facility Space Utilization Study. Proposals Reggiygd A total of 13 Reque�,t for i1roposals were mailed out to various architectural firms who either possessed relevant experience or who requested to be included in any such mailing. Timely responses were received from 7 firms, These included: 1. John Victor Frega Associates, Ltd. 2. PGA/McDonough 3. Applied Design Associates, Ltd. 4. Richard Preves and Associates 5. Otis Associates, Inc. 6. O'Donnel, Wicklund, Pigozzi and Peterson, Inc. 7. Donohue and Associates AnAJYsis of Proposals Proposals were reviewed individually and collectively by the members of the Public Safety Facility Committee. Each proposal was reviewed according to four major criteria: 1. RMonsiveness to REP - Looking for more than a simple restatement of the issues; providing additional observations and comments; firm philosophy and methodology; ability to meet time constraints, 2. Ability to provideill multi -disciplined services in-house - Avoids potential problems with subcontractors; centralizes all aspects of consultant's project team; allows for immediate response to inquiries and problems. 3. Prior relevant experience with Police. `li - Obviously there are unique requirements for properly designed Police and Fire facilities including compliance with a myriad of local, State and Federal rules and regulations. 4. Cost - Cost, while important, was not considered to be the leading criteria in reaching a conclusion. The following is a synopsis of each of the proposals: John Victor FreyaA�coci4tes, -Good coverage of RFP, however, did not specifically address ability to define non- public safety redevelopment potential for the site or temporary facilities issue. -Will require some subcontracting in the areas of Mechanical Engineering and real estate. -Possesses good prior experience with like projects. Currently involved in construction of a combined Public Safety Facility in Oak Lawn. -Fee not to exceed $43,500. PGAI/McDQnoug_h -Comprehensive coverage of RFP with additional comments and observations. -Multi-disciplined firm. Will not subcontract per their proposal. -Very limited prior experience with like projects based upon information contained in proposal. -Fee not to exceed $39,700. A1212lied-Osign Associ Jes, L -Basic coverage of RFP -Limited staff. Will require sub -contracting in various technical disciplines. -Very limited prior experience with like projects based upon information contained in proposal. -Fee not to exceed $29,800. RichardPr ve5 and Associates -Basic coverage of RFP. No mention of non-public safety reuse of site or temporary facilities issue. -Not a multi -disciplined firm. -Good experience, especially with Fire Stations. -Fee not to exceed $28,690. is Associate -Comprehensive coverage of RFP with additional comments and observations. -Not a multi -disciplined firm. Will require subcontracting. -Good experience with like projects. -Fee not to exceed $24,900. :Dg-nnel. Wicklund. Fivozzi and P -Comprehensive coverage of RFP with additional comments and observations -Not a full multi -disciplined firm. Will require subcontracting. -.Extensive experience with Police and Fire facilities. -Fee not to exceed $24,310. DD-n-o-h—u o and Associat -Comprehensive coverage of RFP with additional comments and observations. -Full multi -disciplined firm with 200 persons in Schaumburg office. -Good experience with like projects. -Fee not to exceed $15,900. alificatior SAf Rg 15 -E smi ended Pr Donohue and Associates, a multi -disciplined engineering/architectural firm, with offices in Schaumburg, has done a substantial amount of work for the Village over the past several years. As you may recall, they served as our lead consultants on the new Public Works facility, which came in on time and within budget. On this and other Village projects, they have always performed satisfactorily and have been responsive to the requirements of staff and elected officials. Communities in which Donohue and Associates has been involved with the construction of Police and Fire facilities were contacted and all were satisfied with the quality of their work. &ornmendation Based upon the quality of their proposal, reference checks, prior dealings with Mount Prospect and their fee, the Public Safety Facility Committee recommends that the proposal be awarded to the firm of Donohue and Associates in an amount not to exceed $15,900. This price has been confirmed with Donohue. There will be no reimbursable expenses incidental to the project, such as for mileage, etc., as long as the Village does not -request additional services over and. above what was requested In -the original proposal. Funding for this project is available in the current budget. ��XA' ORIS MIC MEJ/rcw Chairman Rhone 312 / 392-6000 AGENDA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Regular Meeting Thursday, August 24, 1989 8:00 P. M. Senior Citizen Center 50 South Emerson Street VB_A-52-V-a9, HeIgn Pate, IWO East Cardinal Lan The applicant is requesting variations from: 1. Section 14.1102 to allow a side yard of 7 feet instead of 9'-6" to allow for the existing setback from the house to a new property tine. 2. Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 3 foot setback from the property line to a detached garage instead of 5 feet as normally required by Code. Village Board action will be required for both cases. ZBA-53-V-89, P _9nal d and Elaine Dzigdz1g,,..I03 South Edward Street The applicants are requesting variations from: 1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 16 1/2 foot driveway instead of 15 feet normally allowed for one -car garages. 2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot front yard for a parking pad instead of 30 feet. 3. Section 14.1102.13 to allow a 14 112 inch side yard for a parking pad instead of 5 feet normally required by Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals will be final with regards to the driveway width. Village Board action will be required for the other two requests. MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY TRUSTEES RALPH W ARTHUR MARK W. BUSSE TIMOTHY J, CORCORAN LEO FLOROS GEORGE R. VAN DEEM THEODORE J WATTENSERG Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 CAROL A FIELDS Rhone 312 / 392-6000 AGENDA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Regular Meeting Thursday, August 24, 1989 8:00 P. M. Senior Citizen Center 50 South Emerson Street VB_A-52-V-a9, HeIgn Pate, IWO East Cardinal Lan The applicant is requesting variations from: 1. Section 14.1102 to allow a side yard of 7 feet instead of 9'-6" to allow for the existing setback from the house to a new property tine. 2. Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 3 foot setback from the property line to a detached garage instead of 5 feet as normally required by Code. Village Board action will be required for both cases. ZBA-53-V-89, P _9nal d and Elaine Dzigdz1g,,..I03 South Edward Street The applicants are requesting variations from: 1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 16 1/2 foot driveway instead of 15 feet normally allowed for one -car garages. 2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot front yard for a parking pad instead of 30 feet. 3. Section 14.1102.13 to allow a 14 112 inch side yard for a parking pad instead of 5 feet normally required by Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals will be final with regards to the driveway width. Village Board action will be required for the other two requests. Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda July 27, 1989 Page 2 ZBA-54-V-89._Pelliarino Canuto. 805 K The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow 50% lot coverage in order to build a deck and patio at the rear of the house. Code allows a maximum of 45% impervious lot surface coverage. The Zoning Board of Appeals will be final with regards to this case. Ul"71MMI III ii _ 5auIll ..111111111in, Jill Ni. The applicant is requesting variations from the following: 1. Section 14.102.8 to allow a patio enclosure to remain 5.75 feet from the detached garage instead of 10 feet normally required. 2. Section 14.3016 to allow an existing 27.75 foot driveway width instead of 21 feet normally allowed by Code. Village Board action will be required for both requests. The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.110LA to allow a 61 foot lot width for two new single family lots rather than 65 feet normally required by Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals will be final in this request. Resolutions Z-48-89, Mark Hocin, 1808 Cree Lane Z-50-89, Charles Wilson, 508 North Fairview In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen (15) day period is provided for anyone wishing to appeal their decision. No permit will be issued until this period has elapsed. Phone 312 / 392-6000 AGENDA SIGN REVIEW BOARD Monday, August 21, 1989 Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. I!GN-9-89, Mgdigan'E Apparel Store, 292 Nor.1b Elmhurstd Madigan's Apparel Store, petitioner, seeks to vary the Sign Ordinance and apply for a special use equity option to install two (2) wall signs instead of one adjacent to a street (Section: 7.305.13, Section 7.330.13, and Section 7.720), The proposed sign would read "Madigans' for Men Madigans' Juniors" and installed on a sign band canopy alcove the exterior entrance to their new store at Randhurst Shopping Center. They are occupying the tenant space formerly leased to Charles A. Stevens located between Kohls and Carson Pirie Scott and Company. The signage is 57 square feet in area. They would potentially be permitted up to 102 square feet in exterior sign area, 01 rrr, MAYOR GERALD L, FARLEY TRUSTEES RALPH W ARTHUR MARK W. BUSSE TIMOTHY J, CORCORAN LEO FLOROS GEORGE R.. VAN GEEM THEODORE J, WATTENBERG Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60066 CAROL A, FIELDS Phone 312 / 392-6000 AGENDA SIGN REVIEW BOARD Monday, August 21, 1989 Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. I!GN-9-89, Mgdigan'E Apparel Store, 292 Nor.1b Elmhurstd Madigan's Apparel Store, petitioner, seeks to vary the Sign Ordinance and apply for a special use equity option to install two (2) wall signs instead of one adjacent to a street (Section: 7.305.13, Section 7.330.13, and Section 7.720), The proposed sign would read "Madigans' for Men Madigans' Juniors" and installed on a sign band canopy alcove the exterior entrance to their new store at Randhurst Shopping Center. They are occupying the tenant space formerly leased to Charles A. Stevens located between Kohls and Carson Pirie Scott and Company. The signage is 57 square feet in area. They would potentially be permitted up to 102 square feet in exterior sign area, Phone 312 / 392-6000 NOTICE August 18, 1989 THE AUGUST 23, 1989 MEETING OF THE BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO A LACK OF A QUORUM. THE NEXT MEETING OF THE BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION WILL BE WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1989. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING. �yau14& ry, y % Yb 4 MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY TRUSTEES RALPH W ARTHUR MARK W BUSSE TIMOTHY J. CORCORAN LEO FLOROS GEORGE R. VAN GEEM THEODORE J. WATTENBERG Village o f Mount Prospect VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 CAROL A. FIELDS Phone 312 / 392-6000 NOTICE August 18, 1989 THE AUGUST 23, 1989 MEETING OF THE BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO A LACK OF A QUORUM. THE NEXT MEETING OF THE BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION WILL BE WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1989. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.